The URL can be used to link to this page

05/15/2006 - Packet • • AGENDA • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i MAY 15, 2006 7:00 p.m. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER- TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD T I GARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 PROPOSED CIP (COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM) PROJECTS FOR FY 2006-07 The Planning Commission will review staff's recommendation for proposed projects to be funded for FY06-07. The entire list of proposed projects is available for review on the City of Tigard's web page www.tigard-or.gov. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council. City Council will review the final proposal on June 13, 2006, for adoption. Comments may be sent to the Agustin P. Duenas, P.E., City Engineer at gusatigard-or.gov or Vannie Nguyen, P.E., OP Division Manager vannieatigard-or.gov. To obtain a copy of the proposed projects you may contact Diane Jelderks, Senior Administrative • Specialist at 503-718-2465. 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BASICS - RESIDENTIAL DENSITY(follow-up from April) 7. WORKSHOP WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE 8. OTHER BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT • • Tigard Planning Commission - Roll Call Hearing Date: 5-/5- 06, Starting Time: '7' -tay,.,. COMMISSIONERS: ✓ Jodie Inman (President) / Mitchell Brown t/ Gretchen Buehner '/ Rex Caffall Teddi Duling ✓ Patrick Harbison Kathy Meads `Z Judy Munro (Vice-President) David Walsh Jeremy Vermilyea (alternate) STAFF PRESENT: Dick Bewersdorff ✓Tom Coffee Gary Pagenstecher Barbara Shields Cheryl Caines Denver Igarta Emily Eng Duane Roberts Kim McMillan l/ Beth St. Amand Gus Duenas Phil Nachbar Sean Farrelly • • QTY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes May 15,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER President Inman called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Inman; Commissioners Brown,Buehner, C'iffall,Harbison, Meads,Munro, and Walsh. Also present was Jeremy Vermilyea, Commission alternate. Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Duling Staff Present: Tom Coffee,Director of Community Development; Gus Duenas, City Engineer,Beth St. Amand,Senior Planner,Sean Family,Associate Planner,Jerree Lewis, Planning Commission Secretary The three new commissioners introduced themselves. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS The Park and Recreation Advisory Board met with a consultant about planning a recreation district for the City. The Board determined that it was best to start slow and allow for growth. They would like to use the new neighborhood groups for feedback. A suggestion was made to put a survey in the Cityscape. It was noted that creating a new recreation district would most likely be more expensive than joining the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District. The City Center Advisory Commission met about program issues and plans. They will be meeting tomorrow with Council at their workshop session. Assuming the ballot measure passes,they anticipate coming back to the Planning Commission within a few months. The Transportation Financing Task Force is working on proposals relating to 99W and Hall Blvd. and tying it to the Downtown streetscape. There is also a proposal for a gas tax. The Task Force will be going to Council with a report in July. The Planned Development Review Committee has gone through most of the proposed changes,using feedback received from the Planning Commission. Everything has been PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 15,2006—Page 1 • • included in a revised draft. The committee is on track for completing the draft code language within the scheduled timeframe. 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the April 17,2006 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed bya vote of 5-0. Commissioners Brown, Cattail,and Harbison abstained. 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 PROPOSED CIP (COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM) PROJECTS FOR FY 2006-07 The Planning Commission will review staff's recommendation for proposed projects to be funded for FY06-07. The entire list of proposed projects is available for review on the City of Tigard's web page www.tigard-or.gov. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council. City Council will review the final proposal on June 13, 2006, for adoption. Comments may be sent to the Agustin P. Duenas,P.E., City Engineer at gusatigard-or.gov or Vannie Nguyen,P.E., CEP Division Manager vannieatigard-or.gov. To obtain a copy of the proposed projects you may contact Diane Jelderks, Senior Administrative Specialist at 503-718-2465. City Engineer Gus Duenas summarized the list of proposed Community Investment Program projects for FY 2006-07 (Exhibit A). He also provided highlights of projects completed this year. Commissioner Buehner asked if a stop sign at the Main Street intersection with Tigard Street (going toward Commercial Street) could be installed this winter. Duenas responded that it may be something that could be implemented for a year. Commissioner Meads asked if the City could push the 30 mph speed zone on Hall Blvd. further south. Duenas said that requires a traffic study and it needs to be done in sequence. The signal needed to be installed first before considering the speed zone change. Duenas advised that the Skate Park will be funded by the City. It will be 15,000 square feet with the possibility of future expansion into the Niche area. Commissioner Meads how much savings there would be by moving Public Works into the Water Building. Duenas answered that one of the benefits would be vacating a piece of property where Public Works is currently located. This could be used for the Downtown. Regarding the Tigard Street/Tiedeman Avenue intersection, Council said they want to look at the whole picture in that vicinity, including the North Dakota and Greenburg Road PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 15,2006—Page 2 • • intersection. Commissioner Buehner said she had talked to the consultant about coming down one of the other streets (95th or 98th). The consultant assumed there would be no development in that area. Commissioner Buehner advised there could be rezoning of a big piece of property nearby. If so,that would change the consultant's opinion entirely. Commissioner Meads asked about the Bull Mountain Road/Roshak Road intersection. Duenas advised that this intersection is not in the City limits. The IGA with Washington County is coming to a close, but the City can do projects in the Urban Services Area with an agreement with Washington County. There are two proposed projects in the Urb Area. The City is scheduled to meet with Washington County this week to discuss these projects. In the meantime,the projects are still included in the OP list. Commissioner Offall asked if the gas tax would go to a public vote or if Council would pass the tax. Duenas answered that City Council could pass the tax or it could be referred. Commissioner Buehner moved to recommend approval of the proposed Community Investment Program projects for FY 2006-07 to City Council. Commissioner Ca-FLU seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote. 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BASICS - RESIDENTIAL DENSITY(follow- up from April) Senior Planner Beth St. Amand briefly discussed the upcoming Commission schedule related to the Comprehensive Plan update. She advised that Barbara Shields will come to the Commission in June to discuss the entire Long Range Planning schedule,including planned development and Downtown land use. St. Amand will meet with the Commission on the 3t1 Monday of every month for Comprehensive Plan discussions. St. Amand noted there are 6 main topics for the Comprehensive Plan;the first is environmental quality. This will be presented to the Commission in June. There will also be a progress report on the public involvement program. On June 20,there is a worksession with City Council on the community attitude survey. The Planning Commission is invited to attend this worksession. In July,the results of the community attitude survey will be discussed with the Commission along with a summary of the issues and values of the community. St. Amand followed up on the density calculation discussion held with the Commission in April (Exhibits B, C, and D). She reviewed Metro Capacity Numbers and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (State Goal# 10) as detailed in Exhibit B. She advised that the numbers are based on the City's 1996 boundaries. The Metro Functional Plan assigned 6,308 additional housing units to the City. Our progress to date has been approximately 37%. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 15,2006—Page 3 • • State Goal# 10:Housing sets minimum residential density standards for jurisdictions in the Portland UGB. Tigard has been assigned 10 dwelling units per net buildable acre for new construction. It's a standard that created our zoning years ago. From 1994 to 2006,we've averaged 6.6 dwelling units per acre. This has mainly been affected by how much multi- family has been developed during this time. With regard to consequences for failure to comply with the standards,Metro has implied that they may withhold transportation funding, but they haven't been confronted with a case as yet. St. Amand reviewed the Planning Commission Conjrehensize Plan binder with the Commission. [A copy of the binder will be kept with the Planning Commission secretary at City Hall.] St. Amand provided a brief overview of the basics involved with the Comp Plan update. Using an example of open space, she advised that the steps involved in the process would include value,inventory, assessment, alternatives, and draft plan language. The Planning Commission will act as the steering committee for the Comprehensive Plan update. They will encourage public comment, review reports and data, aid in drafting proposed amendments, and make recommendations to City Council. 7. WORKSHOP WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Sue Beilke and Alice Ellis-Gaut joined the Commission for discussion on the planned development code review. Commissioner Walsh recapped the work completed by the Planned Development Code Review Committee since the last worksession with the Planning Commission. They incorporated feedback from the Planning Commission and the City Attorney into a new draft (Exhibit E). Commissioner Walsh asked if staff could prepare an outline that just showed the areas of change. The PD Committee will meet again to work on more issues and finalize the draft. They will then report back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Walsh asked if the current planned development language allows the Planning Commission judgment over a proposed PD (how much discretion is there to request changes, or to accept or deny the application based on subjectivity rather than objectivity). Tom Coffee answered that criteria approval refers back to the objectives - it gives the Planning Commission the authority to make changes or deny the application. The Commission would have to make findings to support their decision. With the Buildable Lands Survey showing very little available open space, Commissioner Walsh asked if preserving open space on small projects was a realistic goal. For example, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 15,2006—Page 4 • • with a small infill project, could the benefit be applied outside the boundary of the planned development? Can the Planning Commission require the developer to do something down the street or request the developer to contribute to fund for general improvement elsewhere, as long as it is roughly proportional to the benefit that was sought from the planned development? Tom Coffee answered that there are currently park system development charges where fees collected from new units contribute to the expansion of the park system. Perhaps a SDC or a fee-in-lieu-of might be possible for open space. For system development charges, there is no requirement to put the money back into the neighborhoods where development has occurred. Coffee advised that the Commission can exceed the proportionate share if the developer agrees. President Inman noted that sometimes it's worth it to a developer to add amenities if it may help to get their application approved. We can't require them to do it, but it doesn't hurt to ask. Some of the issues the Planned Development Review Committee want to continue to work on include: • density bonuses • consecutive concept plan and detail plan approval • defining open space uses — active/passive uses, buffer areas, trail connectivity 8. OTHER BUSINESS The secretary reviewed the upcoming Planning Commission meeting schedule. Tom Coffee distributed an organization chart (Exhibit F) showing a reorganization recently implemented by the City Manager. The Engineering Department will now be included with Community Development. 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:28 p.m. Jerree Le Planning Co sion Secretary Al'lEST: President Jodie Inman PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—May 15,2006—Page 5 • • FY 2006-07 Presentation Overview Community Investment Program � • Formulation Process 4,4 • Program Areas yp Priorities for FY 2006-07 May 15,2006 4017e, • Proposed Projects -Tigard Downtown Projects e -Citywide Projects • What's Next? Formulation Process Program Areas '41111111M1111 4111111111 Y= • Citywide meeting(December 7,2005) • City Facilities System Program • 2nd Citywide meeting(January 25,2006) . • Parks System Program / • Planning Commission(March 6,2006) - Citywide Parks - Trail Systems :, • City Council(March 21,2006) Open space/greenspaces • Finalize Project List(March—May 2006) • Sanitary Sewer System Program • Presentations in May and June 2006 - Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance - Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements j;- - Citywide Sewer Extension Program 3 ¢. Program Areas '. Priorities for FY 2006-07 • Street System Program • Continue implementation of projects to - Traffic Studies improve the Tigard downtown - Traffic Safety-Related Projects • Complete the Highway 99W Corridor - Pavement Major Maintenance Improvement and Management Plan - Traffic Calming Program - Major Street Capital Improvements • Identify and initiate projects to improve . - Bridge Replacements traffic circulation across and on Highway • Storm Drainage System Program 99W - Storm Sewer Major Maintenance • Continue to implement the Street - Storm Drainage Capital Improvements Maintenance Fee funded projects • Water System Program 5 6 1 • • l ., ,, Priorities for FY 2006-07 i ,» Priorities for FY 2006-07 y Construct the Wall Street approach to Hall -liV • Implement planned Parks projects •• Boulevard to provide joint access for the '2;' .., • Acquire park property as open space or f library and Fanno Pointe for park development • Construct improvements to Hall Blvd ?1 - • Expand the library parking lot • Improve at least one existing park ' . . • Design and construct trail projects ects y .• Install additional traffic calming measures 0, • • Design and construct a skate park Continue with the Citywide Sewer Extension Program projects �'' fr., s Priorities for FY 2006-07 Tigard Downtown Projects ' . • Implement water system improvements aimed ' Burnham Street Improvements at improved delivery and adequate water ,;� • Commuter Rail Station Enhancement - supply • Main Street Safety Improvements • Review City facility requirements • Ash Avenue(Design, rights-of-way acquisition, • Consolidate Public Works to the extent '. " and construction) feasible Commercial Street Improvements(Lincoln to ,,' Main) • Pursue implementation of alternative funding • Commercial Street/Main Street Intersection sources for major street improvements Treatment 8 1©' i' Tigard Downtown Projects Burnham Street ANNIN • Completion of Streetscape Design Project • Catalyst project in support of the Downtown • Downtown park land acquisition revitalization effort • Skate Park design and construction • Streetscape design project will determine • Hall Blvd/99W Intersection Project what the street will look like enhancements • Full improvements in accordance with the • Senior Center Remodel Streetscape concept layout • Consolidation of Public Works Staff at the • Project begins with design and rights-of-way Water Building acquisition 11 12 2 0 0 Burnham Street 'o, Burnham Street Njt, ,g'f' -4111 ,2: 1.—:.10.0/..: •-.,,,_. ,r.-.,r, - - ' t. _ ,,i 1 e' ••,. Ott4'. i • .L " l' .0 -...,._ ,„,i, - , — -'-.'1,.••• - .., v,, ii,r =.1 ,, ,t,. ■AL'Ilb 13 14, 7 ( Commuter Rail Station ,...,. Commuter Rail Platform Location ,-...' Enhancements 01111■111 4111111111111111■1 , ii„. ,.,tr\ 7-,2,,•44$14, """ I,''/,'1 r 1 ; '-----..._ L —, , - .. . , .,....--- v. '',-'',,\ ',---r.•-' , '„' ..,:d..,-,4„..:‘, .,./•- ___ , 15 m-..z.,-:..n.,--- 0.- •-•_ ----- 16 - Commercial Street ,, ,, Commercial Street (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) .. (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) t r ,t • Existing narrow road with pedestrian traffic -.4- --Ty ..,..T-1.1:- 17.2,T -: -1P.N ,.., , ‘....y,„; ,,'Q VA).:A1.7-- •.'- Widening on • Project will widen the street and provide a c.--.;.•-: "'----,-;-,. ".--- ,..7". '" • -• .or4, north side tO -,„, -41e: i ',' ',.. sidewalk on one side ,--',!"-- ,--'-,, -..• 't," - ' •-e A provide a -' '•' ,i'' "*. '''' pedestrian • CDBG Funding/Gas Tax Fund •-•--', ---,'=---4.2:`':;_.:,./.;,... ,-- worky, to 3Z7' Main;Let • Right-of-way needed from either railroad or , .,. _ ,.„ , . • ......•,, '„,.- -, Ma TriMet - '4,1, ‘,,!"-:;-- -`-':' .,.. .- ,' -•. -„,---- ' Intersection • Gateway treatment part of streetscape design _I ---. ..;,.. .. ...,.., ...A. ,4111- treatment ,, a project 1‘, ,.. \k,,,,,..k* 4,C 4.:- *,.4.°,740,' -, portal into the 17 18 4,4r- /.-W.i.-‘s4.4;i*i' .N: dm."'" 3 • • ,M Main Street Safety Improvements ,.,. Ash Avenue Improvements r -• Staff worked with the City Center Advisory v, o . -"; ,, i Secondary access Commission to identify projects •v* tl to the Commuter • • Projects identified are: ` ' ,. Rail parking lot - Increased signage to increase awareness of � , !� _w :.e along Ash Avenue ,. c_ corridor pedestrians 0 �T `_ - Increased overhead lighting for better visibility ;,,f 4" ai # - Relocation of crosswalk at Commercial Street . y, ` .�! 4 - 3-way stop at Tigard/Main intersection :y- - 19:' '20` 7,7,- Skate Park ' Senior Center Remodel . ;4?' '/ Skate Park 4, f «s' '�` ,, y_ Remodel and ..a , location d s . . � V ";t: ; _ ' Seismic 1 d is k;, .� 4, so ' . Upgrade of - , _ I � .�,..,i 1;4;11 I ` Senior Center '* "s '"-..:.'='k' ' _ =- Tigard City Hall& - ---• ' ,- - 'i- Permit Center , •vra y y ,../..9.. 2 22 ,,I . °i`s' Public Works Consolidation , Hall Boulevard/Highway 99W 4,41111111.111111.IIIIIII.M.N1 46,0111111111111 Consolidation i''''` • of Public MSTIP 3 Project ',41"- a Works staff in County has initiated the project ' •' the Water % ;' .„-` _ is -•` Building • Design has begun . . . = Frees u Ci v< • Construction begins in 2007 P ty .. - property for :/-- • City is seeking to incorporate ,:£, future enhancements suitable for a major downtown °"' � gateway into the City development 23 24 4 • ' 0 ,, l7,-,41.4AMA Hall Boulevard/Highway 99W .40, tiam■Ilml■1111='' 1rft: •:...• ' 4,' _ • - , .. ,. . ,::;:, City Facility Projects .0_,z, e .,, -..- ilk.",",/, 2,11,11,-;.--,...,,LI,C-Iket/- -,,,.• "2::, ''', ::::4,,,s. --.... .,„,;,:.„ __,..:...„.,. i 0.1. is: •_ - .,. .1 , .,,, ''''..1 ''' j ' • . ' t'." :.:.. ".,:P ..,:',.. ' ■.'■ . V i'.,f' ,;!' ...,,.... '.. . . .'' ,!f ■' . ..:•,*.::,....:,.. , ,: 1 ,,,, :L'i', ,r.: - . --,Oilt i.-,'-• 1 •-; - ': ----:-- '-q'' 25: - 26' „ c City Facility Projects „„ f:',,t'' PD Underground Storage Tank '- ti11■MENNIN % • • Consolidation of Public Works Facilities :',:!, Decommissioning wi• ; 1,1 . - Public Works will move into the water building of the existing !ft/mill ,,.‘•';' • Senior Center Remodel and Seismic Upgrade - underground fuel wft,' tank tor the ;aai 1 •.. ' - 004,' • PD Underground storage tank upgrade ‘o.,, emergency backup I I t- • Police&Records storage remodel 4, generator eirft ,b;•!: - Remodel of existing Public Works operations building ,,,,,,”''',, for consolidation of records and evidence in one location 1,,,;',,, *,:g Installation of a new P, ' ,.Aapa.,7., 1.._si . ._ .., _.., . . • • Citywide Facility Analysis o,h above-ground tank . . • • Library Parking Lot Expansion . . 27 48” Police Records Storage 4,::', Library Parking Lot Expansion * 1 :;;;,(1%) ''z..:, " '- :dr. •". —it 't,,,,la- -' \„• ^..., 1.,,,4,.. -?:„;:; ill itir--------- L---- —-----2ri I )rj • I . ---Tv f .ti /:„.-..,,v, • , ...,- , Analysis for ,,,'A ll I •ili-7 /111.:_r_—\3_r . . 141.. 1,....C'"'"' proposed =:‘;,!-; !i: -, remodel of 1 ill ,L., .U1/ t,/ ii ,1 •. ... ';',;•:'`. 4. _.„._,,,, Public Works .,_ . ,..,..// : .. _ ~ .V.A.:1,7- .‘., ...-...t...,t, ....___:, ; 'c,- c---• 3-,.--- _ _ ...,,,..4. ....._. .__ __. -,ptu • • Storage -, ,-,-- -- ..:-.. __:,..._....--...2,.:„N_ EA -_:.: - 11. : .,!.. 29 30 -.6.1-...7.------- ----. 5 0 • ' • 1,:f• , , !, ,.''/ ,• I Parks Projects 1411111.11.111111111■111■1 foil■ 44,1 •./.'/;4. • • Northview Park(Shelter and Path) 1117 Parks Projects .. c.,,: • Fanno Creek Trail - From Hall Blvd to Shelter • ;• j% •i - Hall Boulevard Crosswalk at trail intersection • Tualatin River Pedestrian Bridge • Washington Square Regional Center Trail , • Skate Park(from donations primarily) • Tualatin River Trail(Cook Park to bridge) • Park land acquisition 31' . 32 4‘, .,,„ ,• ,,,,,,;••', , %, / *.' Parks Projects 4'y' Parks Projects t t " - 0111111111 rfIIIIMI 1.44 CS- 1 ,, f;A 1 4 '.,,,, Fanno Creek .: installation:v:t—---- Shelter i'r,': ! l Park and Trail 0,,4 , ---;1,/,- rt,-. I,r .*4,,/ , Segment -/-,%%-:" i 4 and path ,-,.,0 north of construction .---Irl. Fanno '4E1.17 i '''1:-W. •-ct: ri c.1- a 1 1‘ ' •7•11.s- , .,_,,,A) i 1 *4,' .- . ‘,,,A, , I „ < . '="....4,•,....;---...--,...4.4% ....- '4,,o MaikairgiMMI '';,'" 33 34 , r j#4.1 Parks Projects *.4 Parks Projects Icli I I I I II il I IIM itrott i AM A Fanno Creek Trail north of . , • ,-0 vir, Fanno Creek on Library ,-,.1 A......d.-•...--4 ",:.„.... ."1 ' . site veth crosswalk on Hag „ : riA „Th ,,••••." u..-:,41„.... *I Washington Boulevard ''' AIA ...,I' I , -' V-- . ,.4-'1 i Square .Li_. -----=',--. ". - I Regional Center Trail ";', .. 17,4,‘ 11=-\'-' <, ..1r4•74:1-4,a -, ,,t-r: 1 -, . ..-...e.1,.,,t1 Project -av,___;,,....7„„:,r.: ' '-' ' 1\,,,,..,-- ••,1r.''''- `NIT.,..^111V'7--- • i '',<:-- _ _ ______ ,,,._ , • , • . - ,TAIIIF NI- . -.,..'"-- 1-t' -;=,":7-.•-•,1u, 4 ' '=' f t ;or t. ' *47CS: • '''' .- — a 35 - 4k Ar Arr Air . 36 . 6 • 0 '-;5P'?': '; -4,;•V' ‘-, • A'rjA' ' - 4frm p .. 4; ';r10 Parks Projects Parks Projects $1111111111... , ' ,litvel, ,-1• . _ , „ r',&‘ Skate Park '1'' :--,,. ... - ' ' - :- Location ,,•- , •:«.....".4. ' 'r•_ - ;;4,•$::, -;707:49',1Srt:r'' -.' ''' V;4; • 4 • .,.. _ .. , ,.. C,'' : 4-_:5-4:'''t--',,-`',, ;:.- - - ,',1 •' ;;;,,t' I ..-,.• r , :7. , , ,,,,, . , 1.---,------zi•• w ;','," Wia - -..,..,„ -4.-„„;-',---:,--- - -__ -,-- Tigard City Hall& .. ;ir,•11t)oci," ','''' - • "--eV,- - l':--- Permit Center f e•;",• '''- ' :144'r••"----,*-- 1•••,,‘ :d..,, . •,- '• ,,,,,. /! •••, 1.:_ —4.---, :1."1.•/;‘, Cook Park Trail from . . 37 Garden to Bridge ,. ( Citywide Sanitary Sewer 0-4 Extension Program ilill 1.1111111■1111 • Proposed projects include: , ,..,.,,, :*,#. -93rd Avenue(at Mountainview Lane) Sanitary Sewer Projects - 4 .i, ,. 4/A -Ann Street(between 121st and 116th) ,r7 - 87th Avenue(north of McDonald Street) - 97th Avenue(between Murdock and Pembrook Street) - Hillview Street(at 102nd Avenue) - Fairhaven Street(east of 115th Avenue) - .:- 39, an' t A4" P03, FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Extensions '' -: Sewer Projects tal.111111111111111.1 1)''''' ,,, Sewer Project Lots Status :, • 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall 100th Avenue 21 Planned - , • Benchview Terrace Sanitary Sewer /.. / Ann Street 6 Planned Access Road ' ,'-' 97th Ave/100th Ave 21 Planned • Sanitary Sewer Repairs Hillview Street 6 Planned li; - Commercial Street .-. Fairhaven Street 19 Planned Avenue 6 Planned - Red Rock Creek near 69th Avenue .-,..; 93rd Avenue 33 Planned ,1,- • Sanitary sewer plan to reduce infiltration Subtotal 112 , ' ., and inflow ‘, , • 41 42 7 • • ''� Highway 99W Corridor Improvements 11111111111111111111■1•1 :- ;;. x • TGM grant funded study of the Highway 99W 6 Street Projects v corridor - Study begins June 1,2006-Duration: 13 months �y - Will evaluate various alternatives for improvement `` I - Will look for potential parallel routes or connections - Will review both land use and physical improvements to 6 N improve circulation and reduce congestion ': it - Result will be a package of projects and land use 4A;:,: yy strategies that can be implemented to improve conditions 43" on Highway 99W Hall Boulevard Hall Boulevard Improvements '/ • _ _ __ Widening of .- Widening of• !� Hall at � � .., Hall on east -.= McDonald to t side north of ` r add aright- Fanno 3, . .. ., , turn lane - Creek YiL /y� £ T�Ro �> t, 45q '46' '?•t^ _`"f{ �v ;:. s ire%; 4rife fHall Boulevard Improvements A Dartmouth/72"d Avenue s Intersection y.- Air, v.,. • All-way stop needs to be signalized 7'fi,, y_-� ...',4144..:3- Widenin of ".. Q ,z". • Project widens the approaches and �: g ar =` - Hall on east 1 Pp _. : -, `• - -ti side north of ';,N installs a traffic signal system 5 - / Fanno • Uses funds collected from developers to .�:, / Creek -,x;<;. ,� partially fund the project wc� '> • Upcoming developments may pay for t" a'� ' construction of improvements 47` 48 8 • • ,.,f Dartmouth/72nd Avenue Intersection 108th Avenue/Durham Road _'Q a.y` `E • Development occurring along 108th • Left-turns onto Durham are difficult during _. : W� peak travel hours 'fx •; • Traffic analysis shows signal is justified at } °y '' that location I. r ' • Project will design and construct a traffic , signal at the intersection ,49" 50 108th Avenue/Durham Road 108th Avenue/Durham Road 0 F•F T � . 51, 7 ''' Wall Street Wall Street Extension .1 .111111111 ',41111.11111111 70 J r ', i ' • Construction of 370 feet of Wall proposed ,<; Via:::, ,, " - Would provide joint access for library and Fanno Pointe .1 -‘---a-6.-iii 4;,--/ c°-.'i', Condominiums ,,, it c- ...,iiiiii+ii ■ .....ui, �, - Environmental permits have been obtained e., ;,I ■ �� r uumunum nr y°i - Comprehensive Plan Amendment to remove one pond €i i i r iii 1rH i_ddb 1% Wall Street y, and realign Pinebrook Creek approved by Planning µ I•� o T, k\ 1�• l S*611 f. Commission and City Council ?e- `yJ; • Construction projected for summer and fall 2006 1 Jl �� 53 54 9 • • ,, Wall Street Traffic Improvement Analysis \ ' - study a , :f_' \ '' i ° - z -t entire area t � k - �, i „„ triri.:4 la ; ►e 5 a needed t - i -,;.'1". s .*.....,t h ,r t': Tigard St. r, rc ' ° ;t+_ i ,r;s lk- < GNorereth n bDuarkg o Rd 55 S.t 55 r .�A Highway 99W@ Bull Mountain Rd Pavement Overlays Right-turn lane improvement , • 68th Avenue Parkway(99W to Atlanta - - Street) i i P '._- ' _, • 72nd Avenue(Baylor Street to 700 ft South) y�� - -:---r..7:.. .' ; • 79th Avenue(Churchill Way to Ashford . �' r r Street ` : • 100th Avenue(Sattler Road to Murdock) , • Pine Street Reconstruction(east of 69th) 58 ,Ate,,,': rye° , ; . :., 68th Parkway Pavement Overlays %; 4 y 011111=111=1111111111, 411111■■•11111■111■ N_=;,. • Upper Boones Ferry Road(72nd Avenue = -a '_`' to Interstate 5 .� >,-. • 136th Avenue(south of Walnut Lane) - `0= P( ' • Garden Park Place Loop(at 110th `' Avenue) it: • Durham Road(Summerfield Drive to rl' Serena Court) 59 60 10 • 0 • 10.474 ;' •' '.4c,C.•,- '',,I•i ''''( 40.;Yr.":;I:.z.:...:°.•,,.:.*:2•-,*,>7, 14 .....•. ,, :1: ik:./'Pine Street 79th Avenue ,., ....1,'''.., IF •. ." ,,,,,,,--,-...„,,,.......-. .. f:,;,: —. of the existing _ ii, , 4.,..,,, ,,,„. ,,,..-- i A- -.,. ,- ",- ,'',-.;.-, . , . - , - • ..,...,..- street plus Nt.. , ....-:..,. shoulders and — ';;,:,,4 ' ' -444'''' appropriate --<,t-, . i* - . .,1 ip ,.- , *rt.-->„----:- . — -,, ,,,,,, _ + ,, - -- ' -.t.,- drainage . - ---- -- .': ''jt" .:::4.:.-NI'. ",i, -.' ` '' ,,,t-',„ ,g11,:c,,,. ,.. ,.f',,,•-0, ..,, ,„,-...,:-, -, . ,c).X.; '61 ' ,„ ,,‘ - /, 4 .‘, „,- .- ,.‘-!, 1,-,,,,,-.-,,,A.,vg,. ".■ 40 Pavement Overlays This Spring 494.4 ,, Pavement Overlays This Spring K.' ,, , • 'I*** ..- 7..:,.7''.' ,, *4., i --:...Z f:,i, ,l'• .- • ' ' 1 'Ak'st ' , ,,,',,-.1•• 4/ . leit i 30 ' ' . ' •,''' , • -, . • . , 4;,3.• ,4 '..„.„-, Greenburg Road ''.•.,,,,,,t, 78th Avenue-99W 4r,c44; Center Street thru ;*0: to Paffle Street :444 4 Tiedeman Avenue 63' 64 intersection , . fti! Proposed Tigard Triangle LID ■ 4111•11=11111111■111111111 ,/, • Specht Properties has _I----1,_–_---, ___.; requested formation of - :1.77-i ri--ii--, :- ' Storm Drainage Projects ,..._ an LID 1:-.•_._.,.).E.t-i' 1 • Council has approved -.- preparation of a t_... Preliminary Engineer's 1.,27411-z-1 Report '--- 4:-.;.-*:rA 1___-, .„., ir___1 t :•••• * * • Formation will depend I. , on the findings of the _J L-....... report 65 66 11 • • •��. Storm Drainage Projects Durham Road @ 108th Avenue Y • 79 AvenSm Draina a Oua� Retaining watt prp.ti r ' ,qr rg • Culvert Improvements 4 repair needed � -K � ,� _ v - Derry Dell Creek at Fanno Creek .,0&. t:.Di - Derry Dell Creek at Walnut Street 17* 4 i'•,, Al: - Tributary of Red Rock Creek at Dartmouthl72nd -.' .: Highland Drive Storm Drainage Pipe ."f:•. Replacement(completion of ongoing project) 1/ n rt r:;; f f X t 3 Hiteon Creek Riparian Enhancement - .h '-/ - Culvert Replacement , Al! Highland Drive 72nd and Dartmouth '- 'A ,f (1111111 ' r= - � Combined Culvert e t—''` storm drainage replacement .r i 1;14?� �, improvement with t , Intersection """ Y , y.. and pavement �.Improvements overlay �" , ^ z i 69 70 r r; Water Projects • Secure 550-foot Reservoir Site 550-foot 1,' Water Projects zone connection to Beaverton 1- • 550-foot zone-10 MG transfer pump station upgrade -.e.: • Aquifer storage&recovery expansion studies • Water line replacements in conjunction with street projects 71 72 12 • 0 ..v9 Water Projects '01'•' ASR Production Well -1 ‘41■111111111■ o. 'Olt: • Lake Oswego Feasibility Study • Menlor Reservoir Recirculation • Replace Well House#2(Gaarde Site) ,.tc:q) i ----- - = V.4 • Telemetry Upgrade Da x;;', 1 , .,..,.„ _______• ... !•.,4). • Existing system is out of date ;:e • l -- , t • New technology will allow for continuous monitoring of water status IA, .,,, ,. • Miscellaneous other water projects ;; ;;*... 7.3;A ” What's Next? 11111111 go • Presentations to: TO); - Budget Committee completed(May 8,2006) 41' - Planning Commission(May 15,2006) - City Council approval(June 13,2006) • ;;,;; • Program effective July 1,2006 75 13 • • 111 MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Beth St. Amand, Senior Planner RE: Residential Density Numbers DATE: May 15, 2006 During the Buildable Lands Inventory presentation on April 17, 2006, the Planning Commission requested residential density statistics. For consistency, Associate Planner Darren Wyss calculated the following numbers using the City's 1996 boundaries, as the Metro capacity numbers were based upon this geography. This does not include land annexed from 1996-2006; unincorporated land within the Urban Growth Boundary was included in Washington County's capacity numbers. 1. Metro Capacity Numbers The City has a housing capacity number of 6,308 additional dwelling units, as defined by Title 1 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (Functional Plan). This number is a "target capacity" for achieving additional dwelling units. It is an estimate based on the minimum number of dwelling units allowed in each residential zoning district. The City determined this number by taking the available buildable lands in the City's 1996 boundaries, calculating the minimum density of dwelling units allowed on those lands by zoning district (80% of maximum density), and including an estimate for additional units in the Washington Square Regional Center. Table 1 shows the City's estimated progress. • • • Table 1: Metro Functional Plan -Title 1 Inside 1996 Tigard Boundary Dwelling Units Built Single Year Family Multi Family Total 2006 T- 0 -- - - - -------- -- - ------- - ------ -- ---- ---- --- ------ ---------- ---- 2005 193 108 301 2004 150 0 150 2003 99 42 141 2002 111 29 140 2001 162 0 162 2000 145 112 257 1999 225 0 225 1998 200 8 208 1997 298 4 302 1996 316 126 442 1995 335 0 335 1994 320 298 _ 618 Total 2561 727 3288 2017 Target Capacity 6308 Progress to Capacity(since 1996) 37.0% 2. Metropolitan Housing Rule (State Goal 10: Housing) This state rule was established to provide adequate housing in the Portland Metro Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). It sets minimum residential density standards for new construction by jurisdiction. The rule states that Tigard must provide for an overall density of ten or more dwelling units per net buildable acre due to its size and location. Portland, Gresham, Beaverton, Hillsboro, and Lake Oswego must also provide 10 du/ac. Table 2 shows that Tigard's new construction within the 1996 City limits averaged 6.6 du/ac from 1994-2006: specifically, 5.6 du/ac for single-family construction, and 17.7 du/ac for multi-family. IP • • Table 2: Dwelling Units per Acre Calculations - NEW CONSTRUCTION 1996 City Limits Single Family Multi Family Total Dwelling Density Dwelling Density Dwelling Density Year Units Acres (DU/Acre) Units Acres (DU/Acre) Units Acres (DU/Acre) 2006 7 1.25 5.6 0 0 0.0 7 1.25 5.6 2005 193 19.06 10.1 108 • 6.13 17.6 301 25.19 11.9 2004 150 22.02 6.8 0 0 0.0 150 22.02 6.8 2003 99 16.56 6.0 42 2.74 15.3 141 19.3 7.3 2002 111 18.69 5.9 29 1.27 22.8 140 19.96 7.0 2001 162 22.33 7.3 0 0 0.0 162 22.33 7.3 2000 145 24.3 6.0 112 6.36 17.6 257 30.66 8.4 1999 225 36.13 6.2 0 0 0.0 225 36.13 6.2 1998 200 42.98 4.7 8 0.08 100.0 208 43.06 4.8 1997 298 58.13 5.1 4 0.04 100.0 302 58.17 5.2 1996 316 68.01 4.6 126 5.03 25.0 442 73.04 6.1 1995 335 66.81 5.0 0 0 0.0 335 66.81 5.0 1994 320 64.33 5.0 298 19.38 15.4 618 _ 83.71 7.4 Total 2561 460.6 5.6 727 41.03 17.7 3288 501.63 6.6 • • • R C • t .uI MEMORANDUM T I GARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Darren Wyss,Associate Planner RE: Buildable Lands Inventory DATE: April 17, 2006 The Planning Commission will be given the opportunity to review, discuss and ask questions regarding the updated buildable lands inventory (BLI) at the April 17t meeting. This review and discussion will provide important information to help commissioners in their role during the Comprehensive Plan update process. The BLI identifies and includes undeveloped land that is available and meets current zoning standards. The Tigard BLI defines buildable land as: 1) privately owned taxlots that are vacant or 2) larger privately owned taxlots that are developed but with 1/4 acre or greater of the taxlot vacant. • Publicly owned land,environmentally sensitive lands,water quality tracts,and homeowner association owned lots within subdivisions are not included. Platted,vacant lots within subdivisions are considered buildable until development has occurred. The updated version of the BLI is complete and reflects activity through the end of 2005 (2005 BLI). Following are some key findings/observations from the 2005 BLI: • Less than 10% of land within the city limits is identified as buildable and the majority lies in residential zones • The majority of commercial land is zoned General Commercial,with no Community or Neighborhood Commercial land included • No Heavy Industrial land is included and the majority of remaining industrial lands lie in three lots under the same ownership • Mixed-Use land is predominately located in the Tigard Triangle • Large lots available for residential development are scarce within the city limits with only 43 (6%) lots greater than 2 acres;meaning smaller partition and infill developments may become the norm or the consolidation of lots will be necessary for future large developments • Vacant lots available are predominately less than 10,000 square feet,while the majority of lots greater than 10,000 square feet are partially vacant; thus increasing the likelihood of minor land partitions,consolidation and infill development becoming more important in the future • Over the past four years, 132 acres have been annexed that were on the BLI at the time • • Within the city limits over the past four years, 82%of new single-family residential • development has occurred upon lands included on the BLI; demonstrating that unexpected infill redevelopment is occurring and that the buildable lands inventory has certain limitations in predicting future growth For more detailed data and analysis,please refer to the attached-report and map. • • • • i. • • 1111 BUILDABLE LANDS REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION -APRIL 17, 20063VA?ra Introduction The purpose of the buildable lands inventory(BLI)is to identify undeveloped land that is available and compatible with development policies and practices. The inventory is useful for informing policy and also as a tool for tracking and analyzing development activity and • trends, as well as helping to project future capacity. This identification of buildable lands is completed by the city on a yearly basis (since 2002) and total acreage is reported at the end of a calendar year.The BLI process uses a protocol that employs the same basic structure, but is refined each year for efficiency and to increase accuracy. However,the attributes of buildable land have remained the same over the years. The updated version of the BLI is complete and reflects activity through the end of 2005 (2005 BLI). This report provides information on the 2005 BLI and changes in the inventory over the past four years. Basic information on residential building permits and annexations are reported to show their relationship to and influence upon the BLI. Finally,a map showing the spatial location of land included on the 2005 BLI is included as Attachments A. • Definition of Buildable Land The Tigard BLI defines buildable land as: 1) privately owned taxlots that are vacant or 2) larger privately owned taxlots that are developed but with 1/4 acre or greater of the taxlot vacant.While Metro uses a 1/2 acre minimum for partially developed land,protocol reduced it to reflect higher densities on infill taxlots.Additionally,publicly owned land, sensitive lands,water quality tracts,and homeowner association owned lots within subdivisions were not included. Platted,vacant lots within subdivisions are considered buildable until development has occurred. 2005 BLI Key Findings/Observations Figure 1 displays the relationship between the 2005 BLI and the total area of Tigard. Figure 1. Relationship of 2005 BLI to Total area Less than 10%of land within the city commercial ELI Mixed-Use BLI limits is currently classified as buildable. 1% 1% Industrial BLI This of course does not limit +X Residential BLI development to this less than 10%,but 6% points to the possibility of increased pressure to redevelop properties, to Developed increase density,and to look for mixed- 91G use areas in absorbing more residential development. • Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 1 of 6 • • ■ Table 1 displays total acreage for the 2005 BLI, based on four planning designations. The 2005 Table 1.2005 BLI (acres) BLI is separated into two categories: 1.inside Tigard City Urban c the city limits and 2. unincorporated urban City Services • �' � Zoning Limits Area Total services area. The buildable lands inventory Commercial 51.07 0 51.07 has been divided in this manner since 2002 in Industrial 69.14 0 69.14 order to show the relationship that exists Mixed-Use 45.15 0 45.15 between the two areas and also because of the Residential 435.55 235.41 670.96 Urban Planning Area Agreement. It provides a Total 600.91 235.41 836.32 good look at temporal and spatial patterns. Inside the city limits, the breakdown of the 2005 BLI is commercial(8.5%),industrial (11.5%),mixed-use (7.5%),and residential (72.5%). The inventory contains only residential land in the unincorporated urban services area. Table 2 breaks the 2005 totals down into Table 2. 2005 BLI (acres) zoning districts and gives a more complete Tigard Urban look at what is available. City Services Zoning Limits Area Total Commercial Land- Only two of the four C-C 0 0 0 commercial districts contain buildable land and C-G 40.84 0 40.84 83%of that is zoned General Commercial. C-N 0 0 0 The lack of Community and Neighborhood C-P 9.16 0 9.16 Commercial land available limits the ability to CBD 1.07 0 1.07 develop neighborhood markets,restaurants, or -H 0 0 0 coffee shops within walking distance of most -L 25.55 0 25.55 residences. I-P 43.59 0 43.59 MUC 3.38 0 3.38 Industrial Land-No buildable land remains • MUE 28.11 0 28.11 in the Heavy Industrial district and of what MUE-1 8.30 0 8.30 remains in Light Industrial, 69% (17.64 acres) MUE-2 0.75 0 0.75 is located on the Fields property. Likewise, MUR-1 3.90 0 3.90 80% (34.7 acres) of the buildable Industrial MUR-2 0.71 0 0.71 Park land is also located on the Fields property. R-1 3.35 0 3.35 This distribution inhibits the possibility of R-2 1.36 0 1.36 developing a large project without redeveloping R-3.5 24.25 0 24.25 property with an existing use. R-4.5 205.45 8.12 213.57 R-7 123.61 220.77 344.38 Mixed-Use Land-Mixed use districts all R-12 44.03 5.66 49.68 contain some buildable land,but the majority is R-25 33.50 0.71 34.21 zoned Mixed Use Employment (63%) and R-40 0 0 0 located in the Tigard Triangle. Total 600.91 235.41 836.32 Residential Land-Buildable land located in • residential districts also shows some interesting patterns. Looking at the unincorporated urban services area,94% of buildable land lies in the R-7 zoning district (as mentioned previously,all buildable land located here is zoned residential). This leaves very little low, medium-high, or high density land available outside the city limits. Within the city limits,a large portion of the 2005 BLI is zoned low density(53%is R-3.5 or R-4.5) or medium density (28%is R-7). The remaining low density residential land(R-1 and R-2) comprises only 1% of buildable residential land and all is partially developed. No land zoned R-40 remains on the inventory,within the city limits or urban service area. • Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 2 of 6 • 2005 BLI and Lot Size • Tracking the buildable acres Table 3. Distribution/Number of Lots -2005 BLI is a helpful Tigard City Limits Urban Services Area exercise,but a� @ taking a look i5 .2 D = C m a atafew E , ai @ E z a�i additional Lot Size U cc 1— U E ce '- attributes can Less than 5000 sq ft 6 5 12 69 92 0 0 0 57 57 help to paint a 5000 to 10,000 sq ft 9 4 17 241 271 0 0 0 82 82 clearer picture 10,000 sq ft to 1 acre 27 11 50 246 334 0 0 0 93 93 of what lies 1 to 2 acres 7 2 6 79 94 0 0 0 33 33 ahead for the 2 to 5 acres 5 2 2 35 44 0 0 0 24 24 city. Table 3 5 to 10 acres 1 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 8 8 breaks the More than 10 acres 0 3 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 2005 BLI Total 55 27 87 678 847 0 0 0 297 297 down into the planning designations and distributes the lots based on size (the buildable land inventories for all years are now clipped to taxlot boundaries,as opposed to the previous method of allowing"parcels" of land to cross taxlot and zoning boundaries). In the city limits,a majority of buildable lots lie within residential zoning. However, the more telling story is the size of the residential lots inside the city that are included on the 2005 BLI. 82% of the buildable residential lots are less than one acre in size and 46%are less than 10,000 square feet. Large lots available for residential development are scarce within the city limits with only 43 (6%) lots greater than 2 acres for a total of 260 acres. This distribution shows that • consolidation and partitioning of lots may become the primary means of increasing residential capacity. Vacant vs. Partially Vacant Figure 2 expands upon lot size by breaking the numbers into vacant or partially vacant. This distinction gives a sense of the effort needed to develop the lot.According to the BLI definition of buildable land (see page 1),vacant lots in Figure 2 have no development and partially vacant lots have development present,but 1/4 acre or more undeveloped. Looking within the city limits at residential lots on the 2005 BLI,a great majority of lots less than 10,000 square feet are vacant,meaning they are more than likely part of a platted subdivision and cannot be divided further. The opposite is true for lots greater than 10,000 square feet as the majority are partially developed and few(21 lots) remain vacant greater than 2 acres. The future of large Figure 2. Distribution of Residential Lots Within City Limits residential 2005 BLI developments may 250-1 — I 212 lie in consolidating 200-1 lots that contain 150 existing homes. Otherwise,partitions and infill 45 51 so/! zs leiss z za — 1s development will o �— ,,,� ®71° , become the primary °o g o m means of expanding • y N C sO O g id .- m N 0 v, 2 W the housing base within the city limits. El Vacant 0 Partiafy Vacant Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 3 of 6 Table 4 simply provides a glimpse at all planning designations and how the buildable land is distributed between vacant and partially vacant lots. Table 4. Development Status-2005 Buildable Lands Inventory • Tigard City Limits Urban Services Area r.i N U To N Ta CD U @ a) m D E" a`) .r c v,_.. a i= u, o a) E = w o E -=-- . a) (- - -ca - - -- - Lot Size cj c F 0 c g I° Vacant Lots 38 16 56 403 513 0 0 0 186 186 acres 39.93 62.10 33.14 204.07 339.24 0 0 0 98.30 98.30 Partially Vacant Lots 17 11 31 275 334 0 0 0 111 111 acres 11.14 7.04 12.00 231.49 261.67 0 0 0 137.11 137.11 Changes from 2002 to 2005 We now take a look at the changes in buildable land over time. A comparison of the BLI from 2002 to 2005 is included in Table 5. Within the city limits,there has been minimal loss of commercial buildable land (2.44 acres,4.6%),while the loss of industrial buildable land (1.23 acres, 1.7%) is more than likely a result of data clean-up over the years. Mixed-use losses from the BLI are 8.9 acres (16.5%),while residential losses total 71.91acres (14.2%). This shows that the city is predominately developing properties on the BLI for residential uses. However,residential land on the BLI has increased over the past two years (18.07 acres). This is due to the annexations that have occurred. The annexations and development have combined for a total loss of 41.1%of buildable land in the urban services area. Table 5. Buildable Lands Analysis(acres) • Tigard Urban Services Area Zoning 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 Commercial 53.51 51.87 51.99 51.07 0 0 0 0 Industrial 70.37 70.87 70.04 69.14 0 0 0 0 Mixed-Use 54.05 52.88 53.86 45.15 0 0 0 0 Residential 507.46 417.48 419.75 435.55 399.57 336.39 299.57 235.41 Total 685.39 593.09 595.64 600.91 399.57 336.39 299.57 235.41 'The increase of buildable land within the city limits is due to annexation,which also removes that land from the urban service area(slight variations between years within zoning districts may be the result of data clean-up) Table 6 (see next page) compares the buildable lands over time by zoning district. There has been a steady decrease in all residential zoning districts,both inside and outside of the city limits, except for the R-7 zoning district. It has seen a 15.1%increase in the amount of buildable land within the city limits and a loss of 41.1%in the urban services area. This is again due to a noteworthy transfer of buildable land into the city limits through annexation. • Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 4 of 6 • • • Table 6. Buildable Lands Analysis(acres) • Tigard Urban Services Area Zoning 2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2004 2005 C-C 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 C-G 42.58 41.79 42.11 40.84 0 0 0 0 • C-N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C-P 10.05 9.15 9.18 9.16 0 0 0 0 CBD 0.87 0.93 0.70 1.07 0 0 0 0 I-H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -L 25.33 25.27 25.60 25.55 0 0 0 0 I-P 45.04 45.59 44.44 43.59 0 0 0 0 MUC 10.24 10.08 9.98 3.38 0 0 0 0 MUE 27.96 27.64 28.61 28.11 0 0 0 0 MUE-1 8.58 8.57 8.70 8.30 0 0 0 0 MUE-2 0.76 0.85 0.75 0.75 0 0 0 0 MUR-1 5.09 5.06 5.11 3.90 0 0 0 0 MUR-2 1.41 0.68 0.71 0.71 0 0 0 0 R-1 3.19 3.19 3.35 3.35 0 0 0 0 R-2 1.35 1.35 1.36 1.36 0 0 0 0 R-3.5 30.79 24.97 25.79 24.25 0 0 0 0 R-4.5 256.62 223.32 215.46 205.45 9.20 8.37 8.14 8.12 R-7 107.40 70.27 79.04 123.61 374.52 320.58 284.87 220.77 R-12 65.29 54.20 56.06 44.03 11.67 5.77 5.66 5.66 R-25 42.82 40.17 38.70 33.50 3.99 1.51 0.75 0.71 R-40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Total 685.39 593.09 595.64 600.91 399.57 336.39 299.57 235.41 'The increase of buildable land within the city limits is due to annexation,which also removes that land from the urban service area(slight variations between years within zoning districts may be the result of data clean-up) Annexations and the BLI Table 7 displays the Table 7. Annexation and Buildable Lands Inventory annexations that have Number of Acres Lots Acres on Percentage occurred over the past Year Annexations Annexed Annexed BLI on BLI four years and how 2005 5 71.76 77 63.91 89.1% much of that land was 2004 3 91.8 16 18.51 20.2% included on the BLI. 2003 2 4.24 3 1.94 45.8% The 63.91 acres on the 2002 4 52.91 16 47.48 89.7% BLI that were annexed Total 14 220.71 112 131.84 59.7% in 2005 directly led to the jump in R-7 buildable land within the city. This table shows the majority of land being annexed is considered buildable (59.7%) and that number increases to 75.9%if you remove the 47 acres of land annexed in 2004 that is owned by Clean Water Services and located in the floodplain. • Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 5 of 6 • • . • Residential Permits and the BLI To get a sense of the how well the BLI acts as 0 Table 8. Residential Permits (10 Years) a predictor of development capacity,we can Total Urban look at building permit numbers and Permits Tigard Services -- - ------- ---------- - ------ ---- Issued City Limits - Area -- locations. First,to get a sense of the 2005 221 209 12 residential building activity taking place in the 2004 284 257 27 city and urban services area,Table 8 shows 2003 422 270 152 the number of permits issued and finalized 2002 335 216 119 over the past 10 years. The total number of 2001 494 253 241 yearly permits has fluctuated and is down over 2000 401 258 143 the past two years,due to the limited activity 1999 273 174 99 in the urban services area. Within the city 1998 375 179 196 limits, 2005 saw the fewest permits since 1999. 1997 346 263 83 1996 335 335 0 Predicting future development needs to 3486 2414 1072 account for past trends,but market forces and the composition of available land increases the difficulty. Table 9 makes the connection between the residential permits and the BLI. Although the majority of permits over the four year period were being issued to lots on the BLI,there is still a significant amount (16.9%in the city limits) that is not captured in the buildable lands inventory. This means that the city is experiencing development on lands where it was not anticipated to occur. This can be attributed to a number of reasons,including: the demolition of an existing home and new Table 9. Residential Permits On BLI construction taking its place,the combining of All Urban lots and demolition of homes for new Permits Tigard Services • construction, or an oversight of a partially Issued City Limits Area vacant lot that had the attributes to be included 2005 91.7% 92.3% 80.0% on the BLI. 2004 77.0% 75.4% 92.6% 2003 86.0% 84.2% 89.0% Next Steps 2002 76.6% 81.9% 66.9% Total 82.4% 83.1% 80.5% A more in-depth analysis of these statistics will need to be undertaken to create a better understanding of what lies ahead for the city in relation to development,particularly residential. Factors that must be considered include:will annexations continue to occur at the rate they have in the past, the shrinking amount of buildable land in the urban services area,the amount of development not captured on the buildable lands inventory, the size of lots available and whether development is present on them. Once this analysis is complete, the capacity of the city to accept growth will become clearer. Additionally, the 2006 version of the BLI is being updated quarterly to continue the tracking of trends over time. • • Buildable Lands Report to Planning Commission Page 6 of 6 • • • Y • 2003 enud.bh.Land.Inventory(acre.) . Tgsrd Urban t Buildable Lands CIR Bente. , Im'np IhmNa Me Total )e C•C 0 0 Ca "°' °' f� Inventory - 2005 C•ta 0 0 C•P 0.10 0,10 1:00 .51 l.0 City of Tigard 1•R 3 ! w nL 43.50 ]3,p! '%, Oregon h•v 3.55 135a !� MUG 3.00 3Ja -�• 4 . MUC ]D,OI 20 07 7114_ '1_=___.-= ,1II MU5•1 0.30 00,10 .' ,, !/NUR, ,00 3,00 f.-.y'MUR•a 0,11 Olt - �r '-•' Buildable Land-2005• '65 ;53 C ---LLLIII nee 3Npwna RJR U]3 N.x! • vu R-1.0 203.10 0 2 ]1]51 �� r: L 710e3EnWmnmanlal Buffer R-7 12001 221,72 31 5.32 nw� ' R•12 44,03 150 1060 ',.a _ 7 TIIfe3100yr Flootlplaln R•23 31.50 0.71 N.21 m Lam_ ,al ` Nkle! R•10 ° 0 0 • ' Total 000.12 23621 N2.us JI ,, •, a �� ,JW— T10e3 125% • ___. t •' I e1t� e�I„" _ F� %L slope of or creaser ,P fff ,\ N} ,n nor I 0 Tigard City Limits • ..la �' UrWn Sendcas Boundary 0 �m was - _l.._4. • - �®� o TWdol B0undory • 1111/ � �d `a.� / B R Zoning Classifications y� — C-0 Communlry Comme¢lel • °�. [$ C-G General COmmertlal +�r ,a ' i i ' —'� i C-N NaIphOMloatl Commercial • "1 „ ! CP Pmfesalonal COmmerUel/�7 _ •• w11 f 7 .0 central Buainete DIa01d Mir _Y / "• II•H Heavy IndusWal•, • 11 Llpni Industrial COO �^ 1-P Intlueleel Pork// MUC Mlxetl Use CanmeNel`. • ' � . °r. MUE Mixed Use Employment "'• ' , f £ ±� ®�. MUE•1 Mixed Us°Employment 7� !'. ! 'yt MUE•2 Mixed Use Employment 2 j r !. ' / ,) ® •- MUR-1 Mixed Use Residential 1 S•` , a , a , N MUR.2 Mixed Use Residential•4'1 :/ Y. ''d _ v • R•1 30,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size _1 n ,w+�.J�0 - 1 .. ! �.t� R-2 20,000 Sq Fl Min Lot Slze• •r R-3.5 10,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size �` n. v •wry..,+ - R-4.5 7,500 Sq Ft Min Lot Size R-7 5,000 S Fl Min Lot Size •• •p or �� .,•,,,i 3 1' 4, R-72 3,050 Sq Ft MM Lot Size ,� R-25 1600 Sq Fl Min Lot Sire • -- t• ,' R�0 Fl d Development R ® �u J - 1 4 (P0) Planned Gewbpm0nl Overlay Q (HD) Historic UlslriG Overlay pie.:• 0 t i,. ... arr • ��1 ,e -w wa' ® .arm Inc inventory Pnenean Wmlm„ped5cn,amP'ot.• and was romnleed ova,Arno year period.The imm,y. ' / YI , _ ~� ,as „mind not be cnuiGrtd In exhamnve tut of what AM nu .., 'I. • l,•�• n - .. .. ovnts.levfoor devclopmmt but.atio reweunbom Wed aWehto Inclusion dee not mean.popeny wIN ° .. a"a rG: �.. .'i amaoprtannr..mawbm mw.as cnda,;ona�nn, �`• r-h7d S ' "t __ l _ i( • I.fully Ace.oMevclo0ed.prmuly-owned portals .'."�•�--' ')/1' _ ' t 0` .silt ••' u 2.Panblly vmnt devabped,pinldy-axned parcels• •~. • 11 .eN IN um or melt of the au.went .�.—�• .. • �l ..0 ” ^ky V, �J\ 47. ••rho Information rtW�nlW on Nu mop is ram.as of V reswry l,m06 Ovut writ hem.m Mw*doom ��" Nt :i "J3 ... &I. �1, / 't a mIneMmrne occur b alto the content oflne mop ., V.. n,A•a,� ~ a,♦ ant ` ' 1 `rf� f n I . it • ,r /• yr ( ��„7. ' 2 1;1,1*, £4, .11 1 'J4 111i :II • • E F Proposed Planned Development Code Revisions May 2006___ ••• "{Deleted:May 2006 Deleted:OPTION 2-Reorganize - Chapterq • Chapter 18.120 Deleted:Summary of Major eorga DEFINITIONS R eorstaniz ation.g The chapter was reorganized to consolidate several sections,and create a logical progression of the 5°. "Density bonus"—Additional dwelling units that can be earned as an incentive for providing other sections.The committee ur developed open space,landscaping,or tree canopy as defined further in this code. expressed concern that in PD applications,there was not enough of • a distinction between the concept and 87. "Landscaping"—Areas primarily devoted to plantings,trees,shrubs,lawn and other organic detailed plan.Upon doser gnund cover together with other natural or artificial supplements such as water courses,ponds, examination of the existing code text, staff found that the code itself did not fountains,decorative lighting,benches,bridges,rock or stone arrangements,pathways,sculptures, dearly distinguish the two parts of the trellises and screens. process. Elements of approval criteria were dispersed throughout the chapter,and applying the code to projects required a bit of gymnastic 104.Open Space Facility related definitions. Open Space Facilities may be privately or publicly owned: talent. The code has been a. Minimal Use Facilities.Areas reserved for low-impact recreation, limited to soft surface trails which • asn9on uz s fro;me ovreersa live minimally maintained. No-other improvements(apart from underground utilities)are allowed. purpose,an outline of the process, b. Passive Use Facilities. Areas reserved for medium-impact recreation and education uses related to t miscellaneous procedural functions and values of a natural area that require limited and low impact site improvement,including so requirements,followed t y distinct �1 P P g sections addressingfor the three surface trails, raised walkways, pedestrian bridges, seating areas, viewing blinds, observation dec' elements of the PD process:the informational signage, drinking fountains, picnic tables, interpretive centers,and other similar facilitie overlay zone,the concept plan,and Accommodations for ADA access shall be provided where site considerations permit. 4 e detained plan.q c. Active Use Facilities. Areas reserved for high-impact recreation that require a greater degree of Si I Revised Purpose Statement.q development and/or ground disturbance; such as fields, playground equipment, grou ice The committee spent considerable P gT sports p p time drafting an updated purpose shelters,swimming pools,hard and soft surface pathways,restrooms,and similar facilities. statement to reflect current trends in development and community desires. A greater balance between (Renumber definitions after#55 according'to the above amendments! development opportunities and contributions to the community assets was sought Environmental considerations were made more Chapter 18.350 central to the purpose of the PD code.1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 11 Mandatory Open Space Requirement.1 In addition to requiring a certain Sections: percentage of open space,the 18.350.010 Purpose committee made deliberate 18.350.020 Process distinctions in the types of open space(minimal use,passive use 18.350.030 Administrative Provisions recreation,and active use recreation). 18350.040,Concept,lan Submission Requirements Changes to the definition chapter were added.1 18.350.050 Concept Plan Approval Criteria • q (_Ctl� 18350.00 Detailed Development Plan Submission Requirements Deleted:Conceptual 18.350.070 Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria Deleted:Development Deleted:5 18.350.010 Purpose Deleted:18.350.060 Overlay Zone J Requirementl A. yu}pose.Thepurposes of the planned development overlay zone are: {Formatted:Underline Deleted:Page /A Deleted: of J {Deleted: . .June 29,2005 Page,1 of,,1.5 May 3,2004;j �3 • I . 1 1. To provide a means for property development/hat is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive-Pia(Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" thr�ugh the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the-C4,Deleted:wIfich results in development and .,-'{Deleted:city 2. To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs,walkable communities,preservation of significant natural resources,aesthetic appeal,and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code;and _ 3.I To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits, while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning;and 4.1 To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, wat resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation Del` ` alternatives,conceptual review,then detailed review)that can relate the type and design of a development tio, Deleted:provide a benefit to the owner particular site and ; and d developer consistent wth the degree ' positive negative - neighbors and to the public resources and 5. To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of d ensity requirements ,whih,tivi facilities of Tigard;and , balance the interests of the owner,developer,neighbors.and the City. .{Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" {Formatted:Underline v - t� Formatted:Underline 6. To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainabP- and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. ;'i Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05° Delete d: or preliminary subdivision • 18.350.020 Process plat.q t Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" A. 4pk licable in all zones. The planned development designation is an overlay zone applicable to all zones.i! Formatted:Underline applicant may elect to develop the project as a planned development, in compliance with the requirement)!Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" this chapter,or in the case of a commercial or industrial project an approval authority may apply the prov sii Deleted:1 of this chapter as a condition of approving any application for the development. ; 1:: Deleted: B. Elelments of approval process. There are three elements to the planned development approval proesjs;,1/ Formatted:Indent First line: 0.05", follows: : Tabs: 0.25",Left 1. The approval of the planned development concept plan;and :' , ',(Deleted:040 :(Deleted:development 2. The approval of the detailed development plan. Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05", v Tabs: 0.25",Left 3. The approval of the planned development overlay zone; r;1:1;:,:: Deleted: .A planned development overlay zone shall be processed by means C. pe'ision-makingp[OCCSS. of a Type III-PC procedure,as governed by Section 18.390.050,using approval 1.r The concept plan shall be processed by means of a Type III-PC procedure,as governed by Section I,:.::::::::::11 criteria contained in Section 18.350.050. 18.390.050,using approval criteria contained in Section 18.350.050, t`, (i Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.39" .'i:1; Deleted:4. 2 •he detailed development plan shall be reviewed by means of a Type III-PC procedure,as governe+7 py/:. • 18.390.050 to ensure that it is substantially in compliance with the approved cone t lan. •,ii ;' Deleted: In the case of an existing `� p }� p planned development overlay zone 3. f'he planned development overlay zone will be applied concurrently with the approval of the detailt plea _ted:Page '' Deleted: of 4„ Applicants may choose to submit the concept plan and detailed plar1for concurrent review subject 1!d� ,/,/,•(Delted; June 29,zoos I Page ofJ5 -�May 3,2006,/; S . meeting all of the approval criteria for each approval.All applicants are advised that the purpose of Formatted:Indent Left: -0.26°, separating these applications is to provide them clear direction in developing the detailed plans.Rejecti.' Hanging: 0.26° _ of the concept plan will result in a corresponding rejection of the detailed development plan and overlay, Deleted:for any other type of zone. , ; ; application,the application shall be reviewed under the provisions required in the chapters which apply to the particular 5. In the case of an existing planned development overlay zone, once construction of the detailed plan h. land use application been completed, subsequent applications conforming to the detailed elan shall be reviewed under ti>j Deleted:D. .Concurrent conceptual provisions required in the chapter which apply to the particular land use application, ; plan.detailed development plan,and . pverlay zone gpplications.9 .On residential or mixed use projects 6. If the application involves subdivision of land,the applicant may also apply for preliminary plat approval over 5 acres,the detailed plan shall and and the applications shall be heard concurrently with the detailed plan. the overlay zone shall be filed separately, unless the director waives this requirement For commercial or industrial s development,the detailed plan and the ,p. Co icurrent Applications for Concept Plan and Detailed Plan.Jn the case of concurrent applications for , ce, overlay zone shallot filed separately.If � the application involves surbd'vision of plan an• detailed:develo•ment •1. includin: subdivision .••lications the a,a licant shall clearl distin:•is land,the applicant may also apply ... 2 the concept from the detailed plan. The Planning Commission shall take separate actions on each ele e(1t • Formatted ( (31 the Planned Development application (i.e. the concept approval must precede the detailed develo.' = Deleted:E ap[roval;however each required action may be made at the same hearing. • Formatted:Underline • 18.350.030 Administrative Provisions Deleted:•.......•,and overlay ...Egi Deleted:A..Action on the con{..,[5] • Tine limit on film!. of detailed development plan. e concept plan •..royal expires after 1-1/2 ears_:u1-.Formatted:Underline an •t rlication for detailed development plan an, if :•plicable a •relimin. slat .s.roval or I.:•uest- I extension is filed. Action on the detailed development plan shall be taken by the Planning Commissio Deleted:lf the concept and detat [63 means of a Type III-PC procedure,as governed by Section 18.390.050,using approval criteria in 18.350 1 •• Dew:C. Formatted:Underline 1 r_, olling map designation.Theplanned development overlay zone application shall be concurrently app ved. Deleted:The approval of the pli the detailed development plan is approved by the Planning Commission.jlie zoning map shall be amended t Deleted:only after the detail ,.. 8 indicate the approved planned development designation for the subject development site.The approval of 1 planned development overlay zone shall not expire. Deleted:D. 1 Formatted:Underline Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05° _,Ex{ension.The Director shall,upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee,giant' Deleted: _Commission; ... 9 extension of the approval period not to exceed one year provided that: Deleted: .... ... 10 1.1 o changes have been made on the original concept development plan as approved by the Planning,' Commission ;{Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" Deleted: . 2.The applicant can show intent of applying for the detail development plan or preliminary_plat;eview ithit Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" the one year extension period;and ' ;.;,{Formatted:Tabs: 0.25",Left Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.65" 3. ere have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Planpolicies and ordinance provisions.On',' which the approval was based. Deleted`E..• .•„ Formatted:Underline • •D. ' ased development. •-. .- Deleted: . .The Commission may approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases,but in no case shall the' -. Deleted:conceptual total time period for all phases be greater than seven years without reapplying for xincept development '" t (...rill) Ian review. '. e criteria for approving a phased detail development plan proposal are that: "--_; -{ '{Formatted I...[121 i a. The public facilities shall be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase;and • {Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.01° • Deleted:Page...of.... _Jun( 11311 I Page,3 of 5' Ma 3 200. • • III • • • • b. The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary-publi(Formatted:Indent Left: 0.01" facilities.A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard. ' E{_,Su�stantial modifications to the,conceptplan.If the Planning Commission finds that the,detailed develgp.mer{Deleted:F. pl or preliminary plat does not substantially conform to the Foncept plan, a new concept plan s1 i! b(Deleted:conceptual ). required. {Deleted:conceptual : — — -- Et ploIncompliance. Noncompliance with an approved detailed development plan shall be a violation o°�,t, Deleteda chapter. Formatted:Underline '• Formatted:Underline •Cam, Jssjlance of occupancy permits.The development shall be completed in accordance with the approved deii0 Deleted:conceptual development plan including landscaping and recreation areas before any occupancy permits are'issue' Deleted:ual development However, when the Director determines that immediate execution of any feature of an approved deai'i, development plan is impractical due to climatic conditions, unavailability of materials, or other tempo;• :0 condition, the Director shall, as a precondition of the issuance of a required permit, require the posting •lt, Formatted:Underline performance bond or other surety to secure execution of the feature at a time certain not to exceed one year. \••,•(Deleted:H � underline 18 1 50.040,(onceat,,Plan Submission Requirements � {Deleted:Conceptual A. Ge eral submission re'uirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the genera- d Development in 1 rmation required for a Type III-PC procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050 i_nd_the_additio ll.Formatted:Underline in r rmation required by 18.350.040.B.In addition,the applicant shall submit the following: ----{Deleted:[ 1. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the planned development through the particular approach proposed by the applicant.This statement should include: a.A description of the character of the proposed development and the rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant. Deleted:The statement should be b.,An explanation of the architectural style,and what,innovative site planning principles are utilize C7pi`c�t m dedefining the o} including any innovations in building techniques that will be employed. Deleted:sorts of Deleted:Furthermore,the statement C.,AD explanation of how the proposal relates to the purposes of the Planned Development Chapter`should explain as expressed in 18.350.010. .------ {Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.13", `First line: 0.18" , 2. A general development schedule indicating the approximate dates when construction of the Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26", planned development and its various phases are expected to be initiated and completed. First line: o^ , Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26", 3. A statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to the future selling or leasing of all or First line: 0" portions of the planned development.In the case where a residential subdivision is proposed,the,• Deleted. i :5.nformation,-A narratia ve detail statement ntng _statement shall include the applicant's intentions whether the applicant will build the homes,/or descrpreseiption of which is available from the _sell the lots to other builders. .' / Director. e .-{Formatted:Underline B. , .S itional information. In addition to the general information described in Subsection A above, the cogs Deleted:ual development plan,data,and narrative shall include the following information,the detailed content of which can be obtain Fo :Indent Left: 0.26", fro it the Director: • First line: 0" 1. Existing site conditions; Deleted:pie {Deleted: of {Deleted: - .June 29,2005 I Page,4 of J_5 May 3,2000x ' • • • • • 2. A site concept including the types of proposed land uses and structures,including housing typei Formatted:Indent Left: 0.26°, and their general arrangement on the site; fff Fist line: 0° 1 Formatted:Indent Left: 0.26", 3. A grading concept; ` l First line: 0° Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26", 4. A landscape concept indicating a percentage range for the amount of proposed open space'an First line: 0° landscaping,and general location and types of proposed open space(s); Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, First line: 0" 5. Parking concept • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, First line: 0° 6. A sign concept; ••• Deleted:7..A copy of all existing and/or proposed restrictions or covenants,- 7..a A streets and utility concept;and • g_ Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, 8 Structure Setback and Development Standards concept,including the proposed residentianderrsit,First line: 0" target if applicable. "\. `i Deleted:. Deleted:9..A C. 1 wable Uses Formatted:Indent Left: 0.26", First line: 0° 1 n_residential_zones_ In all residential zones, an applicant with a planned development approval m. Form :Underline develop the site to contain a mixture of uses subject to the density provisions of the underlying zone aria- , density bonus provisions of 18.350.100 B2. The following uses are allowed with planned developni• .Formatted:underline approval: Formatted:Indent First line: 0.05" • a. All uses allowed outright in the underlying zoning district; • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0°, Hanging: 0.26" b. Single-family detached and attached residential units; Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26" c. Duplex residential units; • • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26° d. Multi-family residential units; • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26" e. Manufactured homes; • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26° • f. Accessory services and commercial uses directly serving the planned development only and-whit Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", are customary or associated with, but clearly incidental to the uses permitted in the zone, such Hanging: 0.26" - personal services,preschool or daycare,and retail uses less than 5,000 s.f.in sum total; Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26" • g. Community building; Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.26° • h. Indoor recreation facility;athletic club, fitness center,racquetball court,swimming pool,tennis co Formatted:Indent:Left:.0", or similar use; • Hanging: 0.26" Deleted:and • i. Outdoor recreation facility, golf course, golf driving range, swimming pool, tennis court, or•sirnil• Formatted:Indent:Left: 0°, use;and Hanging: 0.26 Deleted:] j. Recreational vehicle storage areas •" • Formatted:Indent Hanging: 0.08° Formatted:Underline 2. I Jn commercial zones. In all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development apprort-tii. develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, :page . maximum of 25%of the total gross floor area may be used for multi-family dwellings in those commerg{.IDeeeted: of zones that do not list multi-family dwellings as an outright use. ::;.1 Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Pages ofd 5 May 3.2006, ' • • • , 3. I jn industrial zones. In all industrial zones, a planned development shall contain only those uses allowe(Formatted:Underline in the underlying zoning district. ' 18.350 050 Conce 1 t Plan A' .royal Criteria R n Deleted:D.:Approval Criteria The l A.The coe.t .lan ma be •..roved b the Commission onl if all of the followin l criteria are met: Deleted:Commission shall make 1 findings that the following criteria are 1. The concept plan includes specific designations on the concept map for areas of open space,and describ satisfied"'hen approving or.approving with condiions,Tole, Plan.The th=r intended level of use,show they relate to other proposed uses on the site,and how they protect n' Commission shall make findings that the f-. res of the site. criteria are not satisfied when denying an application.1 2. •The concept plan identifies areas of significant natural resources,if any and identifies methods for the Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.051 m.•imized protection,preservation,and/or management. ,i Deleted:and 3 Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05° 3. The concept plan identifies how the future development will integrate into the existing neighbohhoa<' :Indent:First line: 0.05^ either through compatible street layout, architectural style,housing type, or by providing a transition betwee_r th existing neighborhood and the project with compatible development or open space buffers. 4. The concept plan identifies methods for promoting walkability or transit ridership,such methods mat Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05° include separated parking bays, off street walking paths, shorter pedestrian routes than vehicular routes, lin ges to or other provisions for bus stops,etc. 5. The concept plan identifies the proposed uses, and their general arrangement on site. In the•case Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" projects that include a residential component, housing type, unit density, or generalized lot sizes shall Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" shown in relation to their proposed location on site. Deleted:The concept plan identifies other amenities or innovations that would distinguish the project from other 6. The concept plan must demonstrate that development of the property pursuant to the plan results i standard developments. development that has significant advantages over a standard development. A concept plan has a signifi Formatted:Font:Not Bold,Not advantage if it provides development consistent with the general purpose of the zone in which it is located/ Italic overall densities consistent with the zone,while protecting natural features or providing additional amenities Formatted:'Indent:Hanging: 0.25", features not otherwise available that enhance the development project or the neighborhood. -- Adjust space between Latin and Asian ,,,c text,Adjust space between Asian text l8.35(.ODetailed Development Plan Submission Requirements and numbers Deleted:q A. 4Gehieral submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the geii ' Deleted:5 information required for a Type III-PC procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, the addition' Deleted:Oro information required by 18.350.040.B and the,approval criteria under 13.350.070. Formatted:Underline Deleted:information contained in B. ,A itional Information. In addition to the general information described in Subsection A above,the detail 1g.3so.o5oA de elopment plan,data,and narrative shall include the following information; Formatted:Underline 11Contour intervals of 2 to 5 ft,depending on slope gradients,and spot elevations at breaks in Deleted: the detailed content of which ._Contour P g P g P grader alon can be obtained from the Director drainage channels or swales,and at selected points,as needed Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.13", • Hanging: 0.13" A specific development schedule indicating the approximate dates of construction activity, includin Fo :Indent:Left: -0.13°, demolition,tree protection installation,tree removal,ground breaking,grading,public improvements,an Hanging: 0.13° • building construction for each phase. ;{Deleted:Page - . A copy of all existing and/or proposed restrictions or covenants. i ,.[Deleted: of v •{Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Page,6 _5 Ma 3 200. / • • 1 --- Deleted:3..Contextual Analysis Moderate to High Density Development Analysis. If proposing development in an area within a Me' a–Building typology and.hierarchy.An designated town or regional center,the followin additional information may be required: of the commercial,public)designated g s g eq (residential,commercial,public)relative to the hierarchy of the various building a. Air movement: Prevailing breezes characteristic of a region may be greatly modified urb• t"CS'general°design,he city approach ful is use inf of a deciding the - new high-rise structures. Predominant air movement patterns in a city may be along roadw S • building.For example,public buildings between buildings. The placement, shape, and height of existing buildings can cr e a may be dominant in Placement and turbulence caused by micro air movement patterns. These patterns may influence the locara on t sign,while residential buildings are subordinate,it is important to maintain building elements such as outdoor areas and balconies. Also a building's design and plac,me any existing hierarchy that reinforces can mitigate or increase local wind turbulence. visual order in the city.Any predominant I architectural solutions and details characteristic of a building type b.Sun and shadow patterns:The sun and shadow patterns of existing structures should be stadii t incorporated in the new building's design determine how they would affect the proposed building. This is particularly import4ni�f, can help type.9 maintain a recognizable building f outdoor terraces and balconies where sunlight may be desirable. Sun and shadow pat-terns', is b..Regional character.An analysis of the should be considered as sources of internal heat gain or loss. Building orientation,window Sza city's regional architectural characteristics and shading devices can modify internal heat gain or loss. Studies should include daily 'r1 so appropriate that est to unique design regional seasonal patterns and the shadows the proposed building would cast on existing buildings 21 characteristics.Regional characteristics open spaces. •• may be revealed through unique architectural types,through vernacular building resulting from local climatic and c.Reflections:Reflections from adjacent structures such as glass-clad buildings may be a pl;oble' cultural characteristics,and from...(141' The development should be designed to compensate for such glare or if possible, oriented,aye': Deleted:an-urban coniet1 Jl from it. Formatted:Highlight • C. Con liance with specific development standards.The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance ' it Formatted:0.Indent:Left: 0.39°, •__ P .,Pe P � P � , Hanging: 0.13" base zone provisions,with the following modifications; Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.39 Hanging: 0.13" IL Lot dimensional standards: The minimum lot depth and lot width standards shall not apply, — 'The Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.39 shall be no minimum lot size except that lots on the perimeter of the project shall not be less'th• Hanging: 0.13° 80%of the minimum size required in the base zone. � ;Underline Site coverage: The maximum site coverage is 80%, except in the IP zone where the maximum si � `conform to the provisions of coverage shall be 75%. Site coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces such as stre•'• the Deb wne as fouows: and sidewalks; Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.13", Hanging: 0.39" Building height: In residential zones,any,increase in the building height above the maximum in th Deleted:%; base zone will require that the structure be setback from the perimeter of the site a distance of at le- Deleted:Any 1-1/2 times the height of the building. (Deleted: . . Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, Structure setback provisions: First line: 0" . Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, a.,Setbacks for structures on theperimeter of the project shall be the same as that required by trie b • First line: 0" zone unless otherwise provided by Chapter 18.360; ,'Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78°, Hanging: 0.26° b. The setback provisions for all setbacks on the interior of the project shall not apply exceptthat•,, Deleted:i. Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78°, (1),All structures shall meet the Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; i Hanging: 0.26" - Deleted:ii. . 0) A minimum front yard setback of 20 feet is required for any garage structure:whic opens facing a street. This setback may be reduced for rear or side loaded garages,, `Page specified on the detailed plan_and proper clearances for backing movements Deleted: of accounted for. `;•[Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Page,of l 5 May 3,2006,f ;• • • , • 1 I (3) minimum front yard setback of eight feet is r uired for any_garage opening-Rif— Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", f� Y � eQ Y_$_ � _ Hanging: 0.26" attached single-family dwelling facing a private street as long as the required off--str I , Deleted:ui..parking spaces are provided,This setback may be reduced for rear or side loaded garag j if specified on the detailed plan and proper clearances for backing movements Deleted: accounted for. . Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.13", 4...---- Hanging: 0.39" c. If seeking to modify the base zone setbacks, the applicant shall specify the proposed setba Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26°, ------ --- -- ------- -- - ____ - either on a lot by lot, or project wide basis. The applicant may propose, or the commission ma First line: ------ require,actual structure footprints to be shown and adhered to. Formatted:Indent:Left: -0.13°, �. Hanging: 0.39" �5. Other provisions of the base zone. All other provisions of the base zone shall apply except, Indent:Hanging: 0.39^ modified by this chapter. .;{Deleted:D. r' f Deleted:Conformance with the I Conceptual Plan required. The Planning t Commission shall approve the detailed development plan upon finding that the plan conforms with the conceptual 18.35(.070 Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria, " development plan approved,or approved with conditions by the Commission. A change from the conceptual plan may be ,4. De ailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if, 11•,ikacceptable unless: fol owing criteria are met: \•,'Formatted:Underline Deleted: I. .The change increases the I.The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan.Minor changes from the concept plan.'; n residential densities,increases the lot make the detailedplan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of p ngl 2. .The change reduces the amount of a. The change increases the residential densities.increases the lot coverage by buildings or re open space and landscaping;9 the amount of parking; 3. -The change involves a change in use;1 4. .The change commits land to development which is environmentally b. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; sensitive or subject to a potential hazard; ;;;i:o; andi :...,e.; 5. .The change involves a majo{...115 c. The change involves a change in use; ;' ;',; Deleted:E. . d. The chan le commits land to develo o ment which is environmentall sensitive or sub'ect td,', Formatted ••. 16 potential hazard:and Deleted:.If the detailed plan if...1171 i,' Formatted (...1181 1 e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking it . Formatted landscaping or other site improvements. 1191 4 Formatted:Font:12 pt,Bold i Deleted:E Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05" All the provisions of the land division provisions, Chapters 18.420 Partitions and...18,431}Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.05° .; Subdivisions,shall be met if applicable; \, Deleted:If the detailed plan is ... 20 J. Except as noted, the provisions of the following chapters shall be utilized as guidelines.•. � �'l planned development need not meet these requirements where a development plan provides alternative desi.,Formatted:Indent:First line: 0.31" and methods, if acceptable to the Commission, that promote the purpose of this chapter. In each case:,4.14 Deleted:; 1 applicant must provide findings to justify the modification of the standards in the chapters listed below. TN Deleted:2 applicant shall respond to all the applicable criteria of each chapter as part of these findings and clearly Deleted:Page 1 identify where their proposal is seeking a modification to the strict application of the standards. For thosp 1 chapters not specifically exempted, the applicant bears the burden of fully complying with those standards,�e' of unless a variance or adjustment has been requested. i 4 Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Paged ofJ_5 Ma 3 200. j' • • ta. Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review. The provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Devetopm Deleted: Review,are not applicable to Planned Development Reviews.The detailed development plan rev' Formatted:Indent Left: 0", is intended to address the same type of issues as the Site Development Review. Hanging: 0.26" b. Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. The Commission may grant an exception to the access standards,upon a demonstration by a professional engineer that the resulting access will not be detrimental to the public safety considering emergency vehicle needs,and provisions are provided for all modes of transportation using the site(vehicles,bicycles,pedestrians,and transit). c. Chapter 18.715, Density Computation and Limitations. Unless authorized below, density shall be governed by the density established in the underlying zoning district, using the minimum lot size established for that district. Where a project site encompasses more than one underlying zoning district, density shall be aggregated for each district, and may be allocated anywhere within the project site,as deemed appropriate by the commission. The Commission may further authorize a density bonus not to exceed 10%as an incentive to incr..� Deleted:The or enhance open space, architectural character and/or site variation incorporated into t . Formatted:Indent:Left: 039", development. These factors must make a substantial contribution to objectives of the plan • Hrst line: 0" •development.The degree of distinctiveness and the desirability of variation achieved shall govern: Deleted:i.. amount of density increase which the Commission may approve according to the following: ` Formatted:Indent:Left 0.39", First line: 0.26° I (1),A 1%bonus for each 5%of the gross site area set aside in open space,up to a maximuntbf 5°, Formatted:Indent:Left 0.37", is allowed for the provision of active use recreational open space, exclusive of areas contained;'i Hanging: 0.13" floodplain, steep slopes, drainageways, or wetlands that would otherwise be precluded;•fro. Deleted:Ili..A.1%bonus for each 1% development; , ,, .' of total project cost invested in 4�': , Deleted:." (2)JJp to a maximum of 5% is allowed for the development of pedestrian amenities, strey(sc ' Deleted:up to a maximum of 5%. development, recreation areas, plazas, or other items from the "Planning Commissiot' Toolbox." Formatted:Indent:Left 0°, �+ 1' Hanging: 0.13" Deleted: . v3 I d. hapter 18.745,Landscaping and Screening.The Commission may grant an exception to the la sc* requirements of this title upon a finding that the overall landscape plan was prepared by a license Deleted: landscape architect, provides for 20%of the gross site area to be professionally landscaped,and mee Deleted:based on findings that the intent of the specific standard being modified. ;', Formatted:Indent:Left: 0", Hanging: 0.13° e. chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements. The Commission may grant,'a Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.52°, exception to the off-street parking dimensional and minimum number of space requirements ill ;lh,Hanging: 0.26° applicable zone if: ,{Deleted:i. T. `' • Deleted:minor exception is not greater (1), The minimum number of parking spaces is not reduced by more than 10 percent';of.•t than to percent of the required parting required parking and Formatted:Indent:Left 0.52°, Hanging: 0.26° • \ al The application is for a use designed for a specific.purpose which is intended"to__ Deleted:ii. permanent in nature, e.g., a nursing home, and which has a low demand for off-str Fo :Indent:Lett: 0.52°, parking;or Hanging: 0.26° .• Deleted:iii. al There is an opportunity for sharing_parking and there is written evidence that the *gel owners are willing to enter into a legal agreement;or Dew:Page Deleted: of ii {Deleted: . .June 29,2005 ) . I Page,92115 Ma 3 200. 1: • • , 1 (4 Public transportation is available to the site, and reducing the standards will not adverse} Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.52", affect adjoining uses;or --.. Hanging: 0.26" '{Meted:iv. ) (51 There is a community interest in the preservation of particular natural features of4he:sil(Formatted:Indent:Left 0.52", which make it in the public interest to grant an exception to parking standards. Il Hanging: 0.26° ••(Deleted:v. ) f.4hapter 18.780,Signs.The Commission may grant an exception to the sign dimensional f Dew: ) _requirements in the applicable zone if: ••••,.--- Deleted:based on findings that: W, The sign is not increased by more than 10 percent pf the required applicable dimensio Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", standard for signs;and Hanging: 0.26" Deleted:i. (21 The exception is necessary for adequate identification of the use on the property;_and, Deleted:minor exception is not greater ' than 10 percent The sign will be compatible with the overall site plan, the structural improvements'. Deleted:ii ) with the structures and uses on adjoining properties. :Indent:Left: 0.65", "•. Hanging: 0.26" • g.Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas. The Commission may grant an exception to the,visa clearance requirements,when adequate sight distance is or-can be met; mil '°'• I • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", h.Chapter 18.810,Street and Utility Improvements,Sections 18.810.040,Blocks;and 18.810.060,Lo Hanging. 0.26^ In addition, deviations from street standards shall be made on a limited basis, and nothing in th Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", section shall obligate the City Engineer to grant an exception. The Commission retains the ability t Hanging: 0.13" not allow an exception but may not grant an exception to street standards not sanctioned by the Ci Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", Engineer, other than through the procedures in 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The Clt • First Tine: 0.57^ _ Engineer may determine that certain exceptions to the street and utility standards are permissib Deleted:1. -public when it can be shown that: ',{Deleted:ii.-in Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", (1) Public,safety will not be compromised t;' First line: 0.57" 'S,.{Deleted:. •(2) Igthe case of public streets,maintenance costs will not be greater than with a confoirmi'nf Deleted:iii..the _designer r;; l Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13",•• ' First line: 0.57" 3 The esign will improve stormwater conveyance either by reducing the rate or amotlnt o; Deleted:3 runoff from present standards or increasing the amount of pollutant treatment. •- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", 4 In addition,the following criteria shall be met: First line: 0" ;, {Deleted:. a. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: -{Formatted (...1211) -f Formatted (1),The streets, buildings and other site elements shall be designed and beefed }Deed:i ( •1221 preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage to the greatest degr Deleted: _i possible. The commission may require the applicant to demonstrate why a particul:• 'LL- — alternate site plan that may result in greater preservation of trees, topography an Forma ... 23 natural drainage would either not be feasible or would result in a greater loss of OS: Deleted:iii.- ) resources; .,,(Deleted:conceptual ) Deleted:,1 ) (2) (Structures located on the site shall not be in areas subject to ground slumping an"0 sliding as demonstrated by the inclusion of a specific geotechnical evaluation; De •Page ,,i.(Deleted: of ) (3)Psing the basic site analysis information from theponceptplan submittalJhe structureis f Deleted: June 29,2005 P 'e a O ofd 5 Mav 3 2000 j� • • _shall be oriented with consideration for the sun and wind directions,where possible;and Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", First line: 0° _b. Buffering,screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: - Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65°, . Hanging: 0.13" Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between'- irigl'Deleted: - j family and multi-family residential,and residential and commercial uses; ' Formatted:Indent:Left 0.13", • First line: 0.13" In addition to the requirements of the buffer matrix(Table 18.745.1),the requireirtent1 • Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", the buffer may be reduced if a landscape plan prepared by a registered Landscape Ar thii• First line: 0.57° is submitted that attains the same level of buffering and screening with alternate mat, Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78°, or methods. The following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy,'o Hanging: 0.13° extent of the buffer required under Chapter 18.745.: De :i Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", fa) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, abagrb ', Hanging: 0.13° pollution,filter dust,or to provide a visual barrier; „N l Deleted:ii • ••.`{Deleted: (b) The size of the buffer needs in terms of width and height to achieve the purpose; • Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.17", • Hanging: 0.26" (c) The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; r• Formatted;Indent:Left: 1.17", • Hanging: 0.26" (d) The required density of the buffering;and t• Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.17", • Hanging: 0.26" (e) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. �•. • Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.17", Hanging: 0.26" (3), On-site screening from view from adjoiningproperties of such activities as serviaq ar- 9 9� .. Fo :Indent:Left 1.17", storage areas,parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided*F. Hanging: 0.26" following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and eicte Fo rmatted:Indent:Left: 0.13 of the screening: First line: 0.57" ' Ha9 9�nmag: 0.26"0:Indent:Left: 0.78 (a) What needs to be screened; ~•• Han m (b) The direction from which it is needed;and • deleted, - ) Formattedd:Indent:Left: 1.04", • First line: 0.13" (c) Whether the screening needs to be year-round. : • Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.04", First line: 0.13" C. ,Privacy and noise: Non-residential structures which abut existing residential dwellings shad' - located on the site or be designed in a manner,to the maximum degree possible,to protect the pt<ia, FOfma 2L4� areas on the adjoining properties from view and noise; • Formatted (-.L251] {Formatted (...1261 j d. Exterior elevations - residential use: Along the vertical face of single-family attached Formatted ,..1271 multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two/q . .i the following: De :ii Recesses,e.g_,decks,patios,entrances,floor area,of a minimum depth of eight felt• ;. Rninatted (...[281 Deleted:iii. a Extensions,e.g.,decks,patios,entrances,floor area,of a minimum depth of eight feet,a, Formatted (,..[291j _maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet;and .-• ,, , Formatted (...[301 j Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. r, %;I Deleted: of e. Private outdoor area-residential use: '"/ ;;.!;{Deleted: - -June 29,2005 I Page,11 21,15 Ma 3 200. f, 0 1110 • . . . . \ „f Deleted:i. I W, Exclusive of any other required open space facility, each ground-level residential thwellin'Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.52", unit shall have an outdoor private area(patio, terrace, or porch)or not less than 48 squar,Hanging: 0.26" feet with a minimum width dimension of four feet; „f Deleted:ii. • -- - Formatted:Indent Left: 0.52°, (21, Wherever possible,private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun;and Hanging: 0.26° - Formatted:Indent Left: 0.52", -__-_al Pat rive outdoor spaces shall_be_screened_or designed_toprovideprivacy for the use-cif- Hanging: 0;26° space. ---_,, _ _ -- Deleted:iii. .. f. Shared outdoor recreation and open space facility areas—residential use: 4.,----:Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", I Formatted.Indent Left: 0" 0 j, Exclusive of any other required open space facilities, each residential ciwellin Hanging: 0.13" . ' development shall incorporate shared usable outdoor recreation areas within the develoi)mel, ,, • Deleted:i. plan as follows: - Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", " (a) Studio units up to and including two bedroom units,200 square feet per unit; 4-- First line: 0 - -; Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", Hanging: 0.13" (b)Three or more bedroom units,300 square feet per unit. .-- ---- ' - Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", .-.. (2), Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable from adjacent units for ''‘. -Hanging: 0.13" reasons of crime prevention and safety; 4--. Fonnatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", .,\., First line: 0.57" (.3j, The required recreation space may be provided as follows: -‘•-, ' Formatted:Indent Left: 0.13", ... _(a)Additional outdoor passive use open space facilities; s, First line: 0.57"-,, '-, Deleted:iii. (b)Additional outdoor active use open space facilities- 4--. ' Formatted _ pram -- ' Formatted _(c)Indoor recreation center;or ... -, -- '-... ' Deleted:facitilies; . _(d)A combination of the above. 4-, lITT,-i '. -{Formatted 1...[34]) ,g.Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crimeprevention: .4-- Formatted ', Deleted: ) U The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas'such" Formed- ( ) streets or public gathering places,semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are.61.parl ...1361 defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for dim F°11natted 1...1371) prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and ' Deleted:I. ,,,..-{Formatted (...[381) al These areas may be defined by,but not limited to: 4-- { Deleted:ii. Formatted ... 39 (a) A deck,patio,low wall,hedge,or draping vine; Formatted (-(4°13 (b) A trellis or arbor; .--- it Formatted 1...[411) (...[4211 (c) A change in elevation or grade; .4.. / f Formatted (...[43]1 ..„, / , Deleted:P ) (d) A change in the texture of the path material; age Deleted: of (e) Sign;or I Deleted: . .June 29,2005 Page,12L1 5 Ma 3 200• / III • l -' Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.91°, (f) Landscaping. ..---- Hanging: 0.26° .------- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", h. Access and circulation: , ..-._ First line: 0.57" Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13°, l, The number of required access points for a development shall be provided i First line: 0" Chapter 18.705; - Deleted:i ' Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.04", (2), All circulation patterns within a development must be designed to accon wda First line: 0° emergency and service vehicles;and Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.04", First line: 0" (3), Provisions shall be made for pedestrian and bicycle ways abutting and throughtDeleted:ii. site if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan or terminate at the boundaries'Qf"th'Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.04^, project site. ... First line: 0° '.• '{Deleted:iii. i. Landscaping and open space: ' Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" (JAResidential Development: In addition to the,buffering and screening requirent@nts ' .Formes:Indent:Left: 0°, paragraph b of this subsection;and any minimal use open space facilities,a minimunt.;ctf 2 Hanging: 0.13° percent of the site shall be landscaped.This may be accomplished in improved open sit. Dew:i. tracts,or with landscaping on individual lots provided the developer includes a landscp Deleted:[ plan and surety for such landscape installation; ., Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.78", j. Public transit: Hanging: 0.13" Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" 1 Provisions for public transit may be required where the site abuts or is within a'hmile' - • a public transit route.The required facilities shall be based on: For Indent:Left: 0", Hanging:ng: 0 0.13" _(a) The location of other transit facilities in the area;and ., Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", Hanging: 0.39" _(b) The size and type of the proposed development. •• Dew`i ., Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.91", The required facilities, lay include but are not necessarily limited to such facilities ass First line: 0^ Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.91°, (a) A waiting shelter, First line: o°• Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", (b) A turn-out area for loading and unloading;and First line: 0.57" ,i Deleted:ii. (c) Hard surface paths connecting the development to the waiting area. •. �\`•.,{Deleted:[ '•,i Formatted ... 44 (3)If provision of such public transit facilities on or near the site is not feasible the devel r Formatted EKES ma contribute to a fund for •ublic transit im s rovements •rovided the Commissib establishes a direct relationship and rough proportionality between the impact of th-Form .•.1461 development and the requirement. • Formatted I...1471 Formatted:Font:Bold '.{Formatted L..x4811 kg Parking: Deleted:i All parking and loading areas shall be generally laid out in accordance with--- requirements set forth in Chapter 18.765; ' Dew`Page ;'A Deleted: of {Deleted: . .June 29,2005 . Page,3 5 Ma 3 200. 1 • • • • 1 OA Up to 50%of required off-street parking spaces for single-family attached dwellings-ml ormatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", be provided on one or more common parking lots within the planned development as Tong First line: 0" each single-family lot contains one off-street parking space. I Deleted:ii. I1. Drainage: All drainage provisions shall be generally laid out in accordance with the requirement Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.26", set forth in Chapter 18.810. An applicant may propose an alternate means for stormwate,Hanging: 0.13° conveyance on the basis that a reduction of stormwater runoff or an increase in the level of treatment will result from the use of such means as green streets,porous concrete,or eco roofs. ------------- ---- -- -- - ---- ---- -- ------- - - - - . Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", m. Floodplain dedication: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the,10 First line: 0.57" year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land ar Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions of a suitabl Hanging: 0.26^ elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. in. Shared Open Space Facilitiesxclusive of any other required open space pr buffer areas,-t Deleted:. q detailed development plan shall designate a minimum of 20% of the gross site area as an-op Deli:facilities space facility. The open space facility may be comprised of any combination of the following: Minimal Use Facilities. Up to 75% of the open space requirement may be satisfied-17 Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", reserving areas for minimal use. Typically these areas are designated around seitsitiv,Hanging: 0.26" lands(steep slopes,wetlands,streams,or 100 year floodplain). 'I Deleted:i. 12, Passive Use Facilities. Up to 100% of the open space requirement may be satisfied- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65 providing a detailed development plan for improvements (including landsdap)n Hanging: 0.26" irrigation,pathway and other structural improvements)for passive recreational use. ' Deleted:ii. X), Active Use Facilities. Up to 100% of the open space requirement may be satisfied-b(Deleted:iii. providing a detailed development plan for improvements (including landscapl Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", irrigation,pathway and other structural improvements)for active recreational use. Hanging: 0.26" 4 The open space area shall be shown on the final plan and recorded on the final eat Or Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13 Ll, p P P p s First line: 0.57" covenants. l .• Deleted:iv. ..., ' Deleted:with the Director Space Conveyance. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in,a adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may requlce Deletes: dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision,provided that the reservation or dediccteot Formatted:Not Strikethrough is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. , ' Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13 I — First line: 0.57" Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plat Formatted:Indent:Left: o policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, tl} Hanging: 0.13" Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites oftDeleted:development character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks or other public use, provided th Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the p First line: 0.57° system. The open space shall be conveyed in accordance with one of the following methods: , Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65", I " First line: 0" OA Public Ownership.Open space proposed for dedication to the City must be acceptable_ Deleted:i it with regard to the size, shape, location, improvement and budgetary and thaintenanc limitations. A determination of City acceptance shall be made in writing by the Parks Deleted:Page Facilities Division Manager prior to final approval. Dedications of open space may be eligiJ Deleted: of {Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Page,14 of 5 May 3,2006,/x` . - • • , for Systems Development Charge credits, usable only for the proposed development,---(Deleted:. deemed to be not acceptable,the open space shall be in private ownership as described below;'Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", ' 4"-" First line: 0.57° Li, Private Ownership.By conveying,title(including beneficial ownership)to a corporate Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.65°, home association or other legal entity,and granting a conservation easement to the City..in First line: 0" form acceptable by the City. The terms of the conservation easement must include provisio Deleted:ii. foc the following; Deleted:with the City retaining the development rights to the property.The (p� The continued use of such land for the intended purposes; terms of such instrument of conveyance must include provisions suitable to the City Attorney for Q Continuity of property maintenance; •• r,,,,%,, Deleted:guaranteeing When appropriate,the availability of funds required for such maintenance; •'':'• Deleted:ranteeing the following: 1 A Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13°, l Adequate insurance protection;and - t•.,i:',. First line: 0.57" Deleted: 1 ( Recovery for loss sustained by casualty and condemnation or otherwise. -;;,3�;,?,1,;(Deleted:(1) +;';,'•tl Deleted:(2) Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13°, First line: 0.57" ;i.;■', Deleted:2 ;'r','0, Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13°, 'r;•; r,,•, First line: 0.57" ,,i,; Deleted:3 $'';' Deleted:(3) ''1r Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" It t. Deleted:a ;•[Deleted:(4 Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" :.;{Deleted:5 • ;,�Deleted:(5 Deleted:18.350.060 Planned Development Overlay Zone Requirementsi Deleted:A.-General submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application consisting of the approved detail development plan and the general information required for a Type Ill ',1, procedure as governed by Section 18.390.050. Deleted:9 B..Approval Criteria. Deleted:The Planning Commission shall review a proposed Planned Development Overlay Zone for C..159 {Deleted:Page 4 Deleted: of, •{Deleted: . .June 29,2005 I Page X15 ofl 5 Ma 3 200. f" • • • Page 1:'[1]Deleted Sean .- 5/8/2006 8:14 AM Summary of Major Changes Reorganization. The chapter was reorganized to consolidate several sections, and create a logical progression of the other sections. The committee expressed concern that in PD applications, there was not enough of a distinction between the concept and detailed plan._Upon closer examination of the existing code text, _ staff found that the code itself did not clearly distinguish the two parts of the process. Elements of approval criteria were dispersed throughout the chapter, and applying the code to projects required a bit of gymnastic talent. The code has been reorganized in a more progressive fashion, setting forth the overall purpose, an outline of the process, miscellaneous procedural requirements, followed by distinct sections addressingfor the three elements of the PD process: the overlay zone, the concept plan, and the detailed plan. Revised Purpose Statement. The committee spent considerable time drafting an updated purpose statement to reflect current trends in development and community desires. A greater balance between development opportunities and contributions to the community assets was sought. Environmental considerations were made more central to the purpose of the PD code. Mandatory Open Space Requirement. In addition to requiring a certain percentage of open space, the committee made deliberate distinctions in the types of open space (minimal use, passive use recreation, and active use recreation). Changes to the definition chapter were added. Substantial Changes in the Approval Criteria for Detailed Development Plans. This section was reworked to create consistency between the purpose statement and the review criteria, as well as incorporate the recommendations of the committee. Revised Ordering of the Approval Process The application of the Planned Development Overlay Zone was physically moved to the end of the process and simplified to include only an affirmation that the terms and conditions applied to the detail development plan had been fully satisfied. The Planned Development Overlay Zone is thereby no longer applied to unimplemented "development concepts". Page3:[2]Deleted Sean t 5/4/2006 3:21 PM D. Concurrent conceptual plan,detailed development plan, and overlay zone applications. On residential or mixed use projects over 5 acres,the detailed plan shall and the overlay zone shall be filed separately, unless the director waives this requirement. For commercial or industrial development, the detailed plan and the overlay zone shall be filed separately. If the application involves subdivision of land, the applicant may also apply for preliminary plat approval and the applications shall be heard concurrently. All applicants are advised that the purpose of separating these applications is to provide them clear direction in developing the detailed plans. Rejection of the concept plan will result in a corresponding rejection of the detail plan and overlay zone. Page 3:[3].Fonnatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Underline Page 3:[3]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Underline Page 3:[4]Deleted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM • • • -Page 3:[4]Deleted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM 9 Page 3:[4]Deleted Sean ,-5/8/20061:54 PM ,and overlay zone Page 3:[4]Deleted Sean . 5/8/2006 1:54 P_M which shall precede approval of the overlay zone) • Page 3:[5]Deleted Sean - - - 5/5/2006 8:30 AM A. Action on the concept development plan shall be taken by the Planning Commission by means of a Type III- PC procedure,as governed by Section 18.390.050,using approval criteria in 18.350.050. ' 'Page 3:Es]Deleted - • '". 'Sean "1 ' " 5/10/2006 2:02144::: B. *age 3:[6]Deleted Sean 5/3/2006 4:02 PMr If the concept and detailed plan or preliminary plat were not heard concurrently, within 1-1/2 years after the date of Commission approval of the conceptual development plan,the owner shall prepare and file with the Director a detailed development plan. Page 3:[6]Deleted i; „ - Sean _ 5/3/2006 3:58 PM; 6 Page 3:16]Deleted Sean " 5/10/2006 2:02'PM 060. Page 3:[7]Deleted -1 Sean = 5/3/2006 4:21 PM The approval,of the planned development overlay zone shall expire whenever the detail plan approval lapses or expires. Page 3:[8]Deleted ," - „ Sean . , .; ,i:5/3/200.6 4:25 PM only after the detail development plan has been implemented. Final action on the zoning map amendment Page-3:[8]Deleted = Sean : = r • 5/3/200634012W shall be taken by the City Council by means of a Type IV procedure as governed by Section 18.390.060 and approval of the detailed development plan by the Planning Commission shall serve as their recommendation to the Council. Page 3:[9]Deleted • Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM • page,3:[9]Deleted Sean = . 5/10/2006 2:02 pm Commission; Page 3:[10]:Deleted " Sean 5/10/2006 2:0213W- Page 3:[10]Deleted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Page 3:[11]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: -0.78", First line: 0" Page,3:[12]Formatted Sean - • 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: -0.78",First line: 0.65" Page I:[13]Deleted Sean -: 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Page Pagel:[13]Deleted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM • • • of Paged:[13]Deleted .: .:`. : Sean` = 5/10/2006'2:02 0,01-z June 29, 2005 Page 7 [14].DeletaiJ Semi ' 5/3/2006 9:31 AM 3.Contextual Analysis -- - - --- ---- - - -- a.Building ing typology and hierarchy: An analysis of the particular building type (residential, commercial, public) relative to the hierarchy of the various building types in the city is useful in deciding the general design approach of a new building. For example, public buildings may be dominant in placement and design, while residential buildings are subordinate, it is important to maintain any existing hierarchy that reinforces visual order in the city. Any predominant architectural solutions and details characteristic of a building type incorporated in the new building's design can help maintain a recognizable building type. b.Regional character: An analysis of the city's regional architectural characteristics is appropriate in developing a design solution that responds to unique regional characteristics. Regional characteristics may be revealed through unique architectural types, through vernacular building resulting from local climatic and cultural characteristics, and from historically significant architecture. Historic structures should be saved by modifying them for the proposed new use or by incorporating parts of the existing structure{s) into the proposed design. c.City form: The delineation of city form created by road layout, location of major open spaces, and architecture-created forms should be analyzed. Elements that delineate city form should be reinforced by architectural development solutions for a particular place within the city. For example, a building proposed for a comer site should be designed to reinforce the corner through building form, entrance, and design details. A building proposed for midblock may be a visually unifying element providing connection and continuity with adjacent buildings. Sites at the ends of important vistas or adjacent to major city squares probably should be reserved for important public buildings. d.Building scale and fenestration: It is important to analyze building scale and fenestration of nearby structures. Reflecting, although not necessarily reproducing, such detailing in the proposed building can provide visual unity and continuity in the architectural character of the city. One example is the use and placement of cornice lines to define the building's lower floors in relation to adjacent buildings. Cornice lines also can define the building's relationship to pedestrians in terms of scale and use. e.Building transition: Sometimes it may be appropriate to use arcades and porches to provide transition between the building's private interior and the public sidewalk. Including them may be especially worthy if adjacent buildings have these elements - f. Views: Important city views of plazas, squares, monuments, and natural features such as waterfronts and parks should be considered. It is important to design the proposed structure to enhance and preserve such views for the public'and for inhabitants of nearby buildings, as well as incorporating them as views from the proposed building. Page.8:115]Deleted Sean' ' • 5/10%200611:03 AM" 1. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; 2. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; 3. The change involves a change in use; 4. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard;and 5. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. `:=Page'8:116]"Formatted Sean .5/10/20062:02.PM Font: (Default) TimesNewRoman,Bold, 12 pt, Bold =Page 8:[17]Deleted Sean`:: 5/,=10/2006 2:02`PM. • • • . If the detailed plan is found to be in conformance with the conceptual plan,the following specific review criteria must additionally be satisfied. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions,the detailed plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. :Page 8:[18]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Font: (Default)TimesNewRoman,Bold, 12 pt, Bold Page 8:[19]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: -0.56", First line: 0", Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and numbers Page 8:[20]Deleted • Sean., - 5/10/2006 11:04 AM If the detailed plan is found to be in conformance with the conceptual plan, the following specific review criteria must additionally be satisfied. The Commission shall make findings that the following criteria are satisfied when approving or approving with conditions, the detailed plan. The Commission shall make findings that the criteria are not satisfied when denying an application. Page 10:[21]Formatted. Sean 5/10/2006:2 02 PM.: Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 10:[22]Formatted . Sean 5/10/-2006;2:02 PM Indent: Left: 1.17", First line: 0" Page 10:[23]Formatted Sean = °.'5/10/2006 2:021M'. Indent: Left: 0.92",Numbered+Level: 1 +Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 2+ Alignment: Left+Aligned at: 0.78" +Tab after: 1.03" + Indent at: 1.03" Page 11:[24]Formatted :Sean:" "•-- 5/10/2006 2:02 PM" Indent: Left: 1.04", First line: 0.13" Page 11:[25]Formatted .Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM` Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 11:[26]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006.2:02 PM. Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0" Page 11:[27]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02:PM-• Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" • Page 11:[28]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 11:129]Formatted. " - . Sean" - _ 5/10/2005 2:02.PM" Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 11:[30]Formatted - Sean '" 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.13" Page 12:[31]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.78", Hanging: 0.13" Page 12:[32]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.78", Hanging: 0.13" Page 12:[33]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.78", Hanging: 0.13" Page 12:[34]Formatted • San 5/10/2006 2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.78", Hanging: 0.13" • • • Page 12:[35]Formatted. ` ':: _ - Sean <:.,=_ -:` '>;:. _ 5/1012006 2:02_PM Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 12:[36]Formatted Sean . 5/10/20062:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0" : : Page 12:[37] .Sean Formatted __- - . - ,_ '� _ ,,.5/10/20002:02.04:- - --Indent: Left: 0:65", Hanging: 0.39" Page 12:`[38]Formatted Sean ,5/1.0120.004:0111.00",7 Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0.57" Page 12:13910iiii atted Sean i:<. :. ::5%10/2006 2:02,PM Indent: Left: 0.91", Hanging: 0.26" . .Page:12:'[40]Formatted :Sean; c% 5/10/20. 062:02=PM r`• Indent: Left: 0.91", Hanging: 0.26" -Page 12:°[41]Formatted.' Sean •;? 5/10/2006:2 02`'PM;= : Indent: Left: 0.91", Hanging: 0.26" Page i2 [42]'Formatted Sean". ::,'`: ;`::=5/10/2006`2:02?PM:.;° Indent: Left: 0.91", Hanging: 0.26" : Page;12:.[43]Formatted Sean 5/10/2006202`PM Indent: Left: 0.91", Hanging: 0.26" Page13:[44].Formatted Sean'. Indent: Left: 0.65", First line: 0.57" Page 13:[45]Formatted Sean := 5/10/20061.02:.PM`r. Indent: Left: 0.65", First line: 0.57" Page 13::[46]Formatted Sean : - ?.- `` = <5%10120004:02=014 ;< Indent: Left: 0.65", First line: 0.57" Page 13:[47]Formatted Sean 5%10%20082:02PW Indent: Left: 0.13", First line: 0" Page 13:[48]Formatted Sean :. - =5/10%2006=2:02 PM Indent: Left: 0.65", First line: 0" 'Page 15:[49]Deleted _Sean 514/200610;31 AIM.'; The Planning Commission shall review a proposed Planned Development Overlay Zone for general and specific conformity to the approved detail development plan. The application and request for the Planned Development Overlay Zone may be processed concurrently with the detail plan approval. • Community Development Organization Chart ` CD Director DT Sr.Planner Tom Coffee — Confidential Asst. Phil Nachbar Jerree Lewis I i , I I Long Range Pig Current Planning Building Development Eng Capital Const.&Transportation ` Building Official e I City Engineer • ` flan Review Gary Lampella Ins ection Engineering Mgr Planning Mgr Planning Mgr f I , ` g g Gus Duenas r 1 Kim McMillan Barbara Shields Dick Bewersdorff Plans Examiner Supv. Inspection Supv. ` \ l \ Brian Blalock Mgmt Analyst Hap Watkins ' ' 5' Sr.Admin Spec, Engineering Mgr Project Eng\ Carissa Collins Sr.Eng.Tech Admin Spec.IT Sr.Admin Spec Diane Jelderks Vannie Nguyen Greg Berry P I Paullzatt i i Doreen Laughlin Patty Lunsford r Sr.Plans Examiner , Sr.Electrical Insp. • ., 5 e .. • Val Admin Specialist H Gary Noble L ` Admin Spec.TI Sr.Eng.Tech Project Eng. J � I al ITenzel Jeanne Temple Sr.Eng.Tech Karleen Aichele Marco C. Sr.Planner Assoc.Planner J P Kathleen M. . 1 1 I. Mike White . .. Beth St.Amand Gary Pagenstecher plans Examiner \ e Sr.Building Insp. • ' Sr.Eng. Tech. ' Admin Specialist T e ' g 'ROW Admin. Assoc.Planner a '� ` Mark Van Domelen l Waidi Olopade . Rick Bolen Sr.Eng.Tech Mike Mills g• Nancy Werner Asst.Planner ' e ` John Raineri Duane R. Chetyl Caines ` Sr.Plumbing Insp. e Permit Tech Eng.Tech II Mike Sheehan e f Assoc.Planner ! ' Debbie:\damski l ' Eng.Tech I Ray Woolf Asst.Planner e- Denver Igarta Emily Eng Inspector II Bethany Stewart . ` )' b Permit Tech ech P . _ e Eng.Survey Spec. I \ r I Dodie Rossetti \ Dan Nelson J John Hadley • Assoc.Planner/G1S Permit Tech 5. \ Darren Wyss Kristi Peennan Permit Specialist Inspector II 1 \ . I e Dianna Howse Chip Barnett • Assoc.Planner Permit Tech 1 ` Sean Farrelly Shirley Treat Permit Tech Inspector II I . i Barbara Butler Albert Shields \ Temp Planner • "T I e \ Alejandro Bancke Code Enforcement Permit Coordinator Inspector I Christine Darnell Vacant Ken Schreindl • COMMUNITY �-..,:, • _ , CITY OF TIGARD TY ��l ; . 11� � k OREGON IW NEWSPAPERS ERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland,OR 97222• PO The following will be considered by the TIGARD PLANNING Box 22109• Portland,OR 97269 COMMISSION on May 15,2005 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Phone: 503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon. Both ■ Email: public oral and written testimony is invited.The public hearing on legaladvertising @commnewspapers.COm this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of ORS � 227.120, Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code,and rules 1 and procedures of the Planning Commission. 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all the parties to I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, respond on the request,precludes an appeal,and failure to specify depose and say that I am the Accounting the criterion from the Community Development Code or Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an g appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of obtained from the Engineering Department at 13125 SW Hall general circulation, published at Beaverton, in Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. . the aforesaid county and state, as defined by PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that PRO2006-07 POSED CIP (Community Investment Program).Projects for City of Tigard Planning Commission will review staff's recommendation for pro- Notice of Public Hearing Department posed projects to be funded for FY06-07. The entire list of pro- posed projects is available for review on the City of Tigard's web TT10788 page www.tigard-or.gov. Planning Commission will make a rec- ommendation to City Council. City Council will review the final a copy of which is hereto annexed,was proposal on June 13, 2006, for adoption. Comments may be sent published in the entire issue of said to t Agstin ue , P.E., City n e at g s Manager r newspaper for v or . Nguyen, CIP v vannie @tiard-or.gov. T o obtain a copy of the proposed projects 1 you may contact Diane Jelderks, Senior Administrative Specialist at 503-718-2465.Publish 5/4/2006 TT10788 successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues May 4, 2006 Ual/ ` .�, . Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this May 4, 2006 --J , t 1 NOTAR i•UBLIC FOR OREGON My commission expires N....)Nnt t 0% t 4C,DQ ! Acct#10093001 ^- --.. -`- - . `- Diane M.Jelderks (1 f,,�"�+-_, SUZETTE IE SEAL City of Tigard ( ��' NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON ) 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1 4 COMMISSION NO.373063 Tigard, OR 97223 y MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28,2007 l Size:2 x 5.25 Amount Due $87.68 'Remit to address above V • Tigard Planning Commission TrAVA\An NOTE: If you would like to speak on this item, please print your name &address on this form. Agenda Item# 5, Page / of Date of Hearing 5-IS - D I- Case Number(s) Case Name Pro(cs c� �6z�� - 0 '? (' I P przjecis Location ei� Lv ; e. Please PRINT your name, address, and zip code Proponent (for the proposal): Opponent (against the proposal): Name: Name: Address: Address: City,State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City,State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City,State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: • • gfer,dz MEMORANDUM T I GARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Agustin P. Duenas, P.E. City Engineer RE: Proposed Community Investment Program Projects for FY 2006-07 DATE: May 8, 2006 The City of Tigard's Capital Improvement Program has been renamed the Community Investment Program. The implementation of capital improvement projects is a major investment in the community, and the new name better conveys that concept to the citizens of Tigard. This document presents the proposed FY 2006-07 Community Investment Program (CIP) projects for review, approval, and recommendation to the City Council. Background The CIP includes improvements to the streets, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water, parks, and city facilities systems. The Engineering Department manages the street, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer CIPs. The Public Works Department manages the Water System CIP and the Parks CIP, and the City Facilities System is jointly managed by the Engineering and Public Works Deparunents. The CIP is reviewed and approved each year by the City Council. The program is developed through a process separate from the City's Operating Budget formulation process. It is developed in close coordination with the City's Finance Director and is formulated early in the fiscal year so that it can be integrated into the City's overall budget process for approval. The program submitted to the City's Budget Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council is a 5-year program with the first year's program described in detail. While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, establishes the budget and projects for the upcoming fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 4 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. Memorandum to Planning Commission—FY 2006-07 CIP Page 1 of 3 • • Process The program update process for FY 2006-07 began in October 2005 with preparation by City staff of a draft project list based on the City's priorities at that time. The formal formulation process began December 7, 2005 with the first of two Citywide meetings to receive input from the public on the draft list of projects. At the first meeting, City staff presented the draft list, answered questions, and received suggestions for additional projects. The draft list was posted on the City's website on the same day. The second Citywide meeting was conducted on January 25, 2006. Prior to the meeting, responses were prepared addressing all comments received. A revised draft list was presented at the second meeting. Presentations to the Planning Commission on March 6, 2006 and to City Council on March 21, 2006 provided opportunities for those two bodies to provide input into the CIP. The formal presentations of the FY 2006-07 CIP are scheduled as follows: Budget Committee May 8, 2006 Planning Commission May 15, 2006 City Council June 13, 2006 Adoption June 13, 2006 The Budget Committee and Planning Commission reviews typically provide opportunities for public comment on the proposed project list. The final project list with modifications, if any, will be submitted for Council consideration and adoption at the June 14, 2005 meeting. Council may make additional modifications to the plan during its review and approval process. The approved plan would be the approved Community Investment Program for the next fiscal year with implementation of the projects beginning July 1, 2006. FY 2006-07 Projects The CIP includes projects under the following system programs: • City Facilities System Program • Parks System Program • Sanitary Sewer System Program • Street System Program • Storm Drainage System Program • • Water System Program Appendix A describes the projects and lists the corresponding funding sources under the various programs for FY 2006-07. The Council goals to revitalize the Tigard Downtown area, continue to seek improvements for Highway 99W, acquire land for greenspaces and Memorandum to Planning Commission—FY 2006-07 CIP Page 2 of 3 • • parks, and address growth are emphasized in the selection of projects for FY 2006-07 and the subsequent four years. The Five-Year CIP Appendix B provides an introduction to the 5-Year CIP. Appendices B-1 through B-6 present the 5-Year CIP projects beginning with FY 2006-07 and ending with FY 2010-11. Unfunded Projects • The establishment of the Street Maintenance Fee provides a stable source of revenue for the City's street maintenance needs and will address the $4 million maintenance backlog over a period of several years. However, the City still lacks a significant source of revenue (beyond the current Traffic Impact Fee revenue) for street expansion projects. The State Gas Tax has not been increased during the past decade. As operating and materials costs increase, the amount available from the Gas Tax Fund is expected to decrease each year. Appendix C shows some of the major projects in streets, parks acquisition, and storm drainage that will not have adequate funding over the next few years. The list provided is not all inclusive but provides an indication of the level of funding required to address some of the projects needed over the next few years. APPENDICES • Appendix A: FY 2006-07 Community Investment Program Projects • Appendix B: Five-Year Community Investment Program Plan • Appendix B-1: City Facilities System Program • Appendix B-2: Parks System Program • Appendix B-3: Sanitary Sewer System Program • Appendix B-4: Street System Program • Appendix B-5: Storm Drainage System Program • Appendix B-6: Water System Program • Appendix C: Unfunded Projects c: Craig Prosser, City Manager Bob Sesnon, Finance Director Tom Imdieke, Financial Operations Manager Dennis Koellermeier, Public Works Director Tom Coffee, Interim Community Development Director Vannie T. Nguyen, CIP Division Manager iAengltrustinemorandurns1new memorandum fonna1ptanning commission-proposed cip protects for fy 2006-07Aoc Memorandum to Planning Commission—FY 2006-07 CIP Page3of3 • • APPENDIX A FY 2006-07 Community Investment Program Projects • • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:15:41 AM City Facilities System Program $1,795,197 Audio/Visual Control System for Council Chambers $83,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $83,000 status: Proposed description: This project is carried over from FY 2005-06 for the provision and installation of audio, visual, and control systems for the Tigard City Council Chambers. Card Reader Installation $18,500 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $18,500 status: Proposed description: The City has several IDF or network wiring rooms throughout its facilities. The FBI is requiring that all IDF rooms be accessed via a card reader system. This project installs card readers at each IDF room and replaces the one at the Library coffee bar. City Facility Security Upgrades $10,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $10,000 status: Proposed description: City facilities are access controlled by a combination of key entries and electronic card entries. The current key system patent will expire in 2007, which will require the City to implement a new key system. In addition, the City desires to install additional card reader entries to reduce the number of entries with key access. This effort will provide better overall access control. This upgrade will be phased in over several fiscal years. Citywide Facility Master PLan $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding for a consultant to prepare a Master Plan for City Hall buildings and determine if remodeling of the buildings would be required. The project also includes extra funding to finance the remodeling if needed. Commuter Rail Station Enhancement $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: The proposed 14.7-mile Commuter Rail line will share freight train tracks with the Portland & Western railroad running through eastern Washington County. In addition to serving Tigard, the line will also serve five stations in Beaverton, Washington Square, Tualatin and Wilsonville. The Tigard Commuter Rail station will be located in the downtown adjacent to the existing TriMet Bus station approximately 300 feet east of Main Street on the north set of tracks. The existing tracks on the south side will be removed. A Park and Ride facility will also be constructed south of the Commuter Rail line. This project provides funding for the design and construction of specific enhancements such as streetscaping, lighting, landscaping to enrich the combined TriMet Bus/Commuter Rail site that will function as a transportation hub in downtown Tigard. Construction is anticipated to begin in late 2006 with service scheduled for 2008. Appendix A • • Consolidation of Public Works Facilities (Water Building) $630,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $630,000 status: Proposed description: The Public Works staff and crews are currently housed in several locations, which leads to inefficiencies in coordination and communication. This project begins the process to consolidate as many of the Public Works Department staff and crews in one building as possible. The Water Building will be reconfigured as needed for efficient operation to accommodate the Public Works staff and crews. Public Works will move from the Ash Street offices to the Water Building after the work is completed. - - This project will include architectural, engineering and construction expenses. Library Parking Lot Expansion $180,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $180,000 status: Proposed description: This project modifies and expands the existing Library parking lot at the northeast corner of the Hall Blvd/Wall Street intersection to provide additional parking spaces for the patrons visisting the Library. The project also relocates the Library entrance immediately east of Hall Blvd to approximately 370 feet east of the street to connect to the proposed Wall Street. This project will be constructed in conjunction with the Hall/Wall Street - Phase 2 project to minimize impacts to the Library and other properties in close proximity. Library Projects - Houghton - Root Donations $427,697 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $427,697 status: Proposed description: Projects to be funded by donations received from Grace Tigard Houghton and Neva Root. Library Property - Voluntary Cleanup $26,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $26,000 status: Proposed description: Soil with higher than normal background levels of arsenic existed on the library property prior to construction. Most of the soil containing the higher concentrations was removed or capped, as part of the library construction project. There is a need to test the rest of the property to determine if any additional mitigation efforts are required. The City has entered into a voluntary cleanup program with the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to evaluate the rest of the site, perform additional tests in areas that were not tested, and determine if additional mitigation is needed. The results of the additional testing and evaluation will determine what, if any, additional mitigation work is needed to produce a "no further action" determination by DEQ. Outside Entrance to PC-4 conference room $15,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: This project modifies the existing conference room at the northeast corner of the Permit Center Bldg. Installation of a new door will allow the public to enter the room without entering the main entrance when conducting public meetings. PD Underground Storage Tank Upgrade $40,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $40,000 status: Adopted - description: Decomission and remove existing underground storage tank for the emergency back up Appendix A • • generator at the Police Department. Install above ground storage tank of same capacity (500 gallons). Police & Records Storage Remodel $15,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: The project remodels the current Public Works operations building to accommodate storage of Police evidence and city records. The remodel includes architect fees, construction costs including modifications to plumbing, electrical and heating systems, purchase of a generator and above ground tank, man lift and shelving units for storage. By remodeling the operations facility, Police and City records will be able to store records and evidence in one location consequently reducing overall operating costs and enhancing more efficient operation. Senior Center Remodel Design (including Seismic Upgrade) $200,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Facility Fund $200,000 status: Proposed description: The Senior Center needs to be remodeled and enlarged to meet the current and fast-growing needs of Tigard's senior population. In addition, as part of the on-going maintenance and update of City facilities, the Center needs to be upgraded to meet current seismic standards. This project includes engineering design, construction documents and construction costs. • Appendix A • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:19:20 AM Parks System Program $1,828,363 BPA Trail Feasibility Study $15,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: This is a proposed pedestrian trail that would extend along the Bonneville Power Administration - - - (BPA) power line easement from SW Beef Bend Road to SW Barrows Road. A consultant will be contracted to develop a preliminary trail alignment study. Clute Property House Demolition $15,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $15,000 status: Proposed description: This house is being demolished to create space for a future small, neighborhood park on City owned property. Fanno Creek Trail (Hall to Fanno Creek) $30,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $30,000 status: Proposed description: This trail segment will be from Hall Blvd. to Fanno Creek, north of the bridge accross Fanno Creek. This segment will connect to the existing trail south of the bridge. Fanno Creek Trail Master Plan $60,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $60,000 status: Proposed description: The Fanno Creek Greenway Trail is a 15-mile recreational and commuter trail that connects the Willamette River in southwest Portland to the Tualatin River near Cook Park. When completed, the Fanno Creek Trail will provide the first regional multi-use trail on the west side of the Portland region, linking existing parks and recreational facilities. More than 50% of the Tigard portion of the trail has been completed. This project provides funding to prepare a Master Plan to identify available rights-of-way along the creek to construct the remaining portion of the trail in the future. Land Acquisition $579,513 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $579,513 status: Proposed description: This project is directly related to the Council goal of "Address growth - Identify and acquire open space and park land". The use ranges from neighborhood parks to greenspace to pocket parks. Northview Park - Shelter & Path Installation $25,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 - Parks Capital Fund $25,000 status: Proposed description: This will continue the park master plan by adding a picnic shelter and a path system within Northview Park. Appendix A • • Parkland Acquisition - Downtown $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding to purchase property north of Fanno Creek in the area designated as Area #2 in the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan. Environmental enhancement of that area to help revitalize the Tigard downtown is expected in the future as part of the Downtown Improvement Plan project recommendations. Skate Park Development & Construction $426,300 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $426,300 status: Proposed description: This project constructs a 15,000 square foot, in-ground skate park in the area of the City Hall parking lot approved by City Council. Funding for this project will come from private donations, general fund and system development charges. At this point, private donations are expected to raise approximately $40,000 and the balance will come from a combination of the General Fund and the Parks SDC fund. These funding sources will be consolidated and transferred into the Parks Capital Fund. Tree Replacement/Planting $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This continues the yearly program to plant new trees in greenways and parks, remove old and hazardous trees, and maintain and protect existing trees. Funding for this is from the fee developers pay when it is not possible to protect existing trees on property that is being developed. Tualatin River/Cook Park Trail from Garden to Bridge $97,530 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $97,530 status: Proposed description: This 1300 foot trail segment will connect the Cook Park Trail to the newly constructed Tualatin River Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge. The funding for this project will come from a state grant, Park SDCs and the fund balance. Washington Square Regional Center Trail $430,020 cip year: FY 2006-07 Parks Capital Fund $430,020 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding for a conceptual design, final design and construction of a trail on the south side of Ash Creek between Highway 217 and Hall Boulevard. The trail will be approximately 3,000 feet long by 10 feet wide and will be a multi-use bicycle and pedestrian path. By providing this trail, pedestrians and bicyclists will be able to bypass the traffic on Hall Boulevard, Greenburg Road, Scholls Ferry Road and Nimbus Avenue. • Appendix A • • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:22:09 AM Sanitary Sewer System Program $2,500,000 79th Ave Sanitary Sewer Outfall $80,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $80,000 status: Proposed description: - - -- - This project installs approximately 1,000 feet of sanitary sewer pipe between 79th Avenue and the CWS 60-inch interceptor running adjacent to Fanno Creek. Construction of the new pipe is necessary to provide an outfall to a proposed sanitary sewer extension district on 79th Avenue that will serve approximately 10 lots on the street. This project will be constructed in conjunction with the 79th Avenue Storm Drainage Outfall project to minimize impacts to private properties. Benchview Terrace Sanitary Sewer Access Road . $40,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: A small creek and drainage from surrounding developments are eroding about 250 feet of a road used by City maintenance crews to reach a sanitary sewer. The road is accessed from Greenfield Drive, just south of the intersection at Benchview Terrace. The purpose of the project is to repair the damage caused by erosion by stabilizing the creek and redirecting drainage. Bonita Road at Milton Court - Pipe Removal $30,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $30,000 status: Proposed description: In FY 2002-03 the City installed approximately 250 feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer pipe to replace an existing pipe that had severe bellies and poor grade. This segment of the line is located at the Fanno Creek crossing west of the Bonita Road/Milton Court intersection. At the time of construction, the City decided to abandon the existing pipe in place with the intention of removing it at a later time. This project is the removal of the pipe crossing Fanno Creek at this location. Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program $2,000,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $2,000,000 status: Proposed description: This 5 year-program, which began in FY 2001-02, extends sanitary sewer services to all developed but un-sewered areas Citywide. The City uses the formation of reimbursement districts to construct the sewers. As residents connect to the new sewer line, they have to pay their proportionate share of the cost of the line, plus the normal connection fee. The FY 2005-06 program proposed to include six reimbursement districts to provide approximately 95 connections to existing homes. However, in order to provide adequate time to purchase easements for construction of the outfalls for 4 districts, last year's program completed only 2 districts: Ash Avenue (at Garrett Street) and 93rd Avenue/Mountainview Lane to provide connections to 37 lots. The following 6 districts are proposed for FY 2006-07: - 87th Avenue (north of McDonald Street) - 97th Avenue (between Murdock and Pembrook Street) - 100th Avenue (between Inez and McDonald Street) - Ann Street (between 121st and 116th Avenue) - Hillview Street (at 102nd Avenue) - Fairhaven Street (east of 115th Avenue). Appendix A • These districts will provide approximately 79 connections to existing homes. The program will need to be extended for several years beyond the original 5-year to address complex design issues, wetland permits and right-of-way acquisitions. Approval from City Council is required to form each district and construct the sewer extensions. The Commercial Area Sewer Extension Program is also funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund and offers commercial entities the opportunity to participate in reimbursement districts for extension of sewer service to commercial areas. The current incentive programs for early connection in residential neighborhoods are not offered to the commercial sector. Funding is provided to accommodate potential projects that may surface during the fiscal year from the commercial sector. Commercial Street Sanitary Sewer Repair (Lincoln to Maint St) $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: This project replaces approximately 50 feet of a severe damaged pipe on Commercial Street between Lincoln and Main Street that has caused frequent infiltration. This project will be designed and constructed in coordination with the Commercial Street Improvements project between Lincoln and Main Street. McDonald Street (at Hall Boulevard) Sanitary Sewer Connection $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: This project connects a previously built but unconnected sanitary sewer on McDonald Street to the existing sanitary sewer system located on Merlyne Ct. This project includes installation of 240 feet of 8-inch sewer main and 2 manholes. Completion of the project will provide 10 connections to existing homes. Red Rock Creek Sanitary Sewer Repair $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: Red Rock Creek has eroded away the soil and base rock from a sanitary sewer manhole and approximately 20 feet of 8-inch main just downstream of the manhole. The manhole and pipe are at risk of collapse due to this erosion problem. This project, located at 6900 SW 69th Ave., will address the problem. Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: The Sanitary Sewer Fund will be used to contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the City's Public Works Department. This program is expected to be a continuing program in future years as routine maintenance would avoid restoration costs that could be several times higher. The Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program in FY 2006-07 will include sewer repair projects located at various locations in the City. Sanitary Sewer Master Plan $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: Sanitary sewers in some areas receive an excessive amount of storm water through unauthorized Appendix A • • connections or deteriorated lines. The storm water causes overloading of sewers and increases the cost of operating the treatment plant. The proposed project provides funding to analyze and identify the sources of the stormwater entering the sewers and prepare a plan to reduce the sources. The project also identifies lines of inadequate capacity by conducting flow monitoring of existing lines to determine the extent of the capacity deficiency. A prioritized list of capacity improvement projects will be prepared as part of this project. Appendix A • • Bull Mountain Road (at Hwy 99W) Right-Turn Lane Widening $75,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund - $75,000 status: Proposed Urban Services description: This project widens the right-turn lane on Bull Mountain Road at Highway 99W. The current eastbound lane from Bull Mountain Road to southbound Highway 99W is not wide enough to accommodate truck turning movements and other large-sized vehicles. In addition, the turning radius is substandard, which makes it difficult for vehicles to stay within the lane while maintaining the travelling speeds. The outfall of the storm drain pipe that runs underneath the road is also broken off and is in need of repair. This project provides funding to relocate an existing planter strip to provide space for widening of the right-turn lane and repair the existing storm drain outfall. It also enlarges the curb return radius for safe turning movements. Coordination with Washington County and the Oregon Department of Transportation on the design of the improvements is in progress. The funding provided is for completion of the project, which is expected to begin in late FY 2005-06. Bull Mountain/Roshak Road Intersection $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund - $100,000 status: Proposed Urban Services description: This project includes evaluation and establishment of the ultimate configuration of the intersection to be used in the future planning around that area and design and construction of interim improvements that would fit into that long-term plan. The interim improvements incorporate the half-street improvements designed by a new subdivision north of the intersection to improve the horizontal alignment of Bull Mountain Road and enhance the street's capacity to accommodate additional traffic volumes generated by new developments in close proximity. Completion of the interim improvements will provide a dedicated left-turn lane from Bull Mountain to Roshak Road, and two through-lanes. Also included in the project are minor drainage work and new striping pattern to accommodate the additional lane. This project is funded from the Urban Services TIF fund in the amount of $100,000, allocated in two fiscal years FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07, with the subdivision providing necessary funding for the half-street improvements required for its development. Burnham Street Improvements $750,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $750,000 status: Proposed description: This project completes the design of Burnham Street between Main Street and Hall Boulevard and provides funding to initiate right-of-way acquisition. Based on current design standards, the street requires a minimum paved width of 44 feet with sidewalks and landscaped strips on each side of the street. The 44-foot paved width may consist of two travel lanes, a center-turn lane and two bike lanes. However, the elements proposed for the street may be modified to incorporate design concepts recommended by the Tigard Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan, which is currently underway. Those recommendations are expected to be completed in the summer of 2006. The final design for Burnham Street is scheduled to be completed in December 2006. Right-of-Way acquisition is anticipated to occur in the fall and winter of the fiscal year and construction to begin in the spring of 2007 if feasible. Commercial Street (at Main Street) Intersection Treatments $75,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This project designs and constructs appropriate treatments on Commercial Street at Main Street. Specific improvements identified in the Tigard Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan, including signage, monuments, streetscape enhancements, light fixtures, landscaping, etc., will be incorporated into the project to ensure consistency of the overall design theme required for downtown Tigard. This project requires coordination with the Commercial Street Improvements Appendix A . • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:33:00 AM Street System Program $6,860,000 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Signalization $500,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $300,000 _ status: Proposed Gas Tax Fund $200,000 description: The 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street intersection is un-signalized, is configured as an "all-way stop" and is one of the most heavily-traveled intersections in Tigard. The multiple lanes on both streets are not conducive to the orderly movement of traffic. Both 72nd Avenue and Dartmouth Street in the vicinity of the intersection are virtually at capacity since they have become desirable routes attracting most local traffic in Tigard. Therefore, the intersection operating conditions are poor and show significant delay in the AM and PM peaks..In addition, the traffic volumes will most likely increase as large vacant properties in Tigard Triangle are developed. Increased traffic volumes would make the intersection unsafe and even more difficult for orderly movement of traffic. This project installs a traffic signal and constructs necessary roadway improvements to improve the traffic handling capacity of the intersection. The design is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2006 and construction is scheduled for the fall of 2006 or spring of 2007. The intention at this time is to explore the formation of a reimbursement district to allocate the project costs among upcoming developments. $127,642 has been collected from developers. The amount of $372,358 will be contributed by the City for the improvements, which would be fully or partially reimbursed by the developments as they occur within the proposed district. Ash Avenue Connection Feasibility Study (Fanno Creek to Scoffins St) $40,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding for a corridor study to determine a feasible alignment for Ash Avenue between Fanno Creek and Scoffins Street. If the recommendation from that study is to retain the extension of Ash Avenue, the design of the street, which may be initiated as early as FY 2007-08 will incorporate improvement concepts developed by the Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Design Plan. • Ash Avenue Construction (Burnham Street to Railroad Tracks) $300,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $300,000 status: Proposed description: Construction of Ash Avenue between Burnham Street and the existing railroad tracks to provide a second entrance and exit to the proposed Commuter Rail station and parking lot is identified in the Downtown Improvement Plan approved by the City Council in 2005. The traffic impact of only one access on Main Street, especially during peak hours, would be extensive. This project constructs a half-street improvement on the new Ash Avenue to provide a 23-foot paved width with sidewalk and planter strip on one side of the street. Appropriate transitions will also be constructed between the new street and the railroad tracks. Necessary rights-of-way will be purchased to accommodate the new construction. The remaining half-street will be constructed in the future to provide a full street section in accordance with the three-lane collector cross section specified in the current Tigard Transportation System Plan. The funding provided is for design and right-of-way acquisition. Construction of the project will be proposed for funding in FY 2007-08. Appendix A • • project, which is scheduled for construction in early-fall of 2006, to minimize impacts to the street and develop a cost-effective approach for both projects. Commercial Street Improvements (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) $400,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $400,000 status: Proposed description: This project involves construction of half-street improvements with sidewalk on the north side of the street to provide a continuous sidewalk on Commercial Street from Lincoln to Main Street. The total paved width of Commercial Street after improvements is 28 feet curb-to-curb, which will accommodate two travel lanes and parking spaces on one side of the street. Due to close proximity of existing homes, trees, bridge piers, and railroad tracks, planter strips will be placed wherever feasible. The preliminary design has been completed and necessary rights-of-way are being acquired from three properties. Construction of the project was originally scheduled for the spring of 2006. However, in order to incorporate the design concepts of the Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan into the project and to assure the rights-of-way are acquired in time for the improvements, the construction has been re-scheduled to early-fall of 2006. Completion of the project will provide a safe and convenient pedestrian route to downtown services and the planned commuter rail station. This project has been approved for CDBG funding in the amount of $91,300 with local matching funds of$208,700 coming from the Gas Tax Fund. Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Design $25,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $25,000 status: Proposed description: The Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan, which was completed in September 2005, identifies eight "catalyst projects" and smaller-scale "brand-Tigard" projects with the potential to enhance the development environment of downtown Tigard. The first step towards implementation of the catalyst projects is to create a Comprehensive Streetscape Plan for the downtown area. The plan will identify an overall theme for the downtown area, establish design details for streets, public spaces, gateways, commuter rail station, parking lots, and recommend improvements suited for downtown streets. The plan will be designed by a Landscape Architect consultant and is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2006. Completion of the plan will provide general design guidelines and a package of projects that can be implemented over a period of years as funding sources become availalbe. Durham Road/108th Avenue Intersection Signalization $150,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $150,000 status: Proposed description: This project was funded in FY 2005-06 for installation of a traffic signal at the Durham Road/108th Avenue intersection. Traffic volumes on Durham Road have steadily increased since the mid 80's and will continue to increase as the street provides a direct connection between two state highways, Highway 99W and Hall Boulevard. Due to the increase in traffic volumes on Durham Road, traffic attempting to turn left from 108th Avenue onto the street experiences excessive delay. The problem has become worse as the residential developments along 108th Avenue are completed and generate impacts on the operations of traffic movements at this intersection. A traffic analysis conducted in March 2005 indicates installation of a traffic control signal on or about 2006 will enhance traffic safety at the intersection. Funding provided for this project is for the design and installation of a traffic signal, including necessary roadway improvements, to provide safe and controlled turning movements for traffic at the intersection. Hall Blvd and Highway 99W Gateway Treatments $75,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $75,000 Appendix A • status: Proposed description: This project designs and constructs landscape and streetscape improvements at the intersection of Highway 99W and Hall Blvd. The improvements will incorporate the design concept established by the Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan. Hall Blvd Half-street Improvements (Fanno Creek to 450 feet north) $150,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $150,000 status: Proposed - -- - _ - _ description: - This project widens Hall Blvd on the east side of the street from the existing Fanno Creek Bridge to approximately 450 feet north. The current northbound travel lane, which is less than 12 feet, will be widened to 12 feet. The narrow roadway shoulder will be replaced with a paved 6-foot bike lane. The new sidewalk will be installed at the ultimate location of the right-of-way required for an arterial (50 feet from the street centerline), which can accommodate a 5-lane street section in the future as needed. A planter strip will separate the bike lane and the sidewalk. Mitigation of the storm water generated by the additional impervious area will also be addressed in the design. The existing bridge will not be widened as part of this project. Hall Boulevard (at McDonald.Street) Right-turn Lane Widening $125,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $125,000 status: Proposed description: This project, which was funded in FY 2005-06, will be extended into FY 2006-07 to complete the design and acquisition of rights-of-way for construction of a southbound right-turn lane on Hall Boulevard at McDonald Street, as indicated by the conditions of approval for the development of the Library. In addition to widening the street, curb and sidewalk are proposed along the new segment of the street to improve pedestrian safety. An ODOT permit will be required for the improvements. A traffic study has been completed identifying required design elements such as lane width, storage lane, corner radius, etc. Construction of the project is tentatively scheduled to begin in late-spring of 2007. Hall Boulevard Crosswalk (at Fanno Creek Pathway) $80,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $80,000 status: Proposed description: This project is carried over from FY 2005-06 for installation of a crosswalk on Hall Blvd to provide a mid-block crossing for Fanno Creek Trail users. Since Hall Boulevard is a state route, location of the crosswalk requires approval from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Upon completion of the project, the crosswalk will provide a mid-block crossing on a heavily-traveled, two-lane state route with a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Flashing beacons will be installed prior to or at the crossing to alert the on-coming two-way traffic of pedestrians crossing the street. Hall Boulevard Sidewalk (Spruce St to 850' south) $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: This project is carried over from FY 2005-06. It enhances pedestrian movements along Hall Blvd south of Spruce Street by installing sidewalks on the west side of the street for approximately 850 feet. Hall Boulevard at this location is a narrow two-lane roadway without sidewalks forcing pedestrians to use the existing bike lane and occasionally encroach into the travel lane. The close proximity of existing homes, landscape and limited right-of-way on this state route preclude placement of planter strips at some locations. This project has been approved for Community Development Grant (CDBG) funding in the amount of$136,725 with local matching funds of $108,275 coming from the Gas Tax Fund, for the total of $245,000, of which $100,000 is allocated in FY 2006-07 to complete the project. Hall Boulevard/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 $700,000. Appendix A • • cip year: FY 2006-07 Traffic Impact Fee Fund $700,000 status: Proposed description: This project constructs a common access to Hall Boulevard for the Library and the Fanno Pointe Condominiums as required by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). To ensure the project is constructed expeditiously for safe crossings at the entrance to the Library, the City divided the project in two phases: Phase 1 is the installation of a traffic signal at the entrance to the Library, which is scheduled to be completed in December 2005. Phase 2 is the construction of approximately of 370 feet of the common access, which has the same alignment with the proposed Wall Street, connecting Hall Boulevard to Hunziker Street. Wall Street is not proposed for construction at this time. Pinebrook Creek will be re-aligned for construction of the access. Because the re-alignment work is characterized as in-stream work, the Division of State Lands permit requires the work to be performed between July and October. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in early- summer of 2006. Highway 99W Corridor Improvement & Management Plan $20,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $20,000 status: Proposed description: Highway 99W carries over 50,000 vehicles per day, half of which is regional through traffic. This highway is currently overwhelmed by the existing traffic volumes. There are no significant parallel routes to this highway, and the traffic congestion will continue to worsen as traffic increases during the next few years. The intersections of Highway 99W with Hall Boulevard, Greenburg Road, and McDonald Street are bottlenecks that seriously hamper the smooth flow of traffic. At peak travel hours, cut-through traffic uses the City of Tigard's collector and arterial system to avoid the Highway 99W traffic congestion. This traffic adversely impacts the arterial and collector street system in the City. The City has received a Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) grant to develop the plan. The study will evaluate various alternatives for improvement of the highway (including development of new parallel routes and connections that can feasibly be made between developments parallel to the highway) between Durham Road and Interstate 5. The intent of the study is to address current traffic deficiencies, present design alternatives and propose strategies that would provide for effective traffic circulation, connectivity and operational improvements to the highway and its corridor. The study would provide a plan for management of the corridor and a package of projects (both large and small) that can be implemented over a period of years as funding sources are identified and designated for these projects. The allocated funding is to provide a local matching fund required by the TGM grant. Main Street Safety Improvements $75,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This project includes minor safety improvements on Main Street including installation of light fixtures, bulbs-out, marked crosswalks, etc. A study will be conducted to determine the feasibility and locations of the improvements. Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) $1,160,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Street Maintenance Fee $950,000 status: Proposed (SMF) Gas Tax Fund $210,000 description: The City has been active in implementing the yearly Pavement Major Maintenance program of corrective and preventative maintenance on streets in Tigard. The program, which includes rehabilitation alternatives, has the abilities to 1) restore the pavement's structural integrity, 2) increase riding quality, and 3) improve traffic safety. More importantly, through this pavement preservation strategy, the City was able to encounter a good return on its maintenance investments, which would have been significantly higher if it used different approaches, i.e. Appendix A • • reconstruction, when the streets are allowed to deteriorate. The City will continue to monitor and evaluate the pavement conditions after streets have been rehabilitated to document the effectiveness of the treatments. So far, the streets that have received treatments, have shown signs of exceeding their expected service lives. Streets scheduled to be included in this year's program are: - 68th Avenue (Highway 99W to Atlanta Street) - 72nd Avenue (Baylor Street to 1,000 feet north) - 79th Avenue (Bond to Ashford Street) = 100th Avenue (Sattler-Road to Murdock S t r e e t)- - - --- --- -- --- -- - - 136th Avenue (south of Walnut Lane) - Durham Road (Summerfield Drive to Serena Court) - Garden Park Place Loop (at 110th Avenue) • - Lomita Avenue (90th Avenue to end) - Pine Street (east of 69th Avenue) - Upper Boones Ferry Road (72nd Avenue to Interstate 5). The project list is subject to change due to actual bid proposals submitted at the time the project is advertised for construction. The lowest submittal bid price could exceed the proposed budget, which would require the City to move some streets from the current fiscal year to FY 2007-08. The Gas Tax fund will provide funding for improvements of the areas outside the existing edges of pavement if needed. Rehabilitation of the streets, including reconstruction if necessary, within the existing edges of pavement will be funded through the Street Maintenance Fee Fund. Sidewalk Improvements $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: The existing network of sidewalks in Tigard is not continuous outside of the newer residential subdivisions. The City recognizes continuity and connectivity are key issues for pedestrians and intends to address these issues through this project The first priority is to provide sidewalks between transit amenities such as bus stops and key activity centers. Extension of existing sidewalks at various locations in the City to provide safe paths to schools for students will also be considered. Tigard Triangle Street Improvements LID No.1 $1,750,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Tigard Triangle LID #1 $1,750,000 status: Proposed Fund description: The Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) identifies the Tigard Triangle as an area where the street infrastructure needs to be significantly upgraded to meet the City's established standards. The formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for construction of street improvements would address some of the deficiencies identified in the TSP. Specht Development, Inc. submitted a petition requesting the formation of an LID to improve certain streets within the Tigard Triangle. The proposed improvements include street and utility improvements to 68th Ave, 69th Ave and 70th Ave between Dartmouth and Baylor Street and Dartmouth Street and Clinton Street between 68th and 70th Ave, all within the Tigard Triangle. In the Council meeting of February 28, 2006, City Council approved the establishment of the proposed LID and directed staff to proceed with the Preliminary Engineer's Report. This project provides funding to complete the report and to construct the improvements for the district if it is formed. Traffic Improvement Analysis - Greenburg Rd/Tiedeman Ave/North Dakota St./Tigard St. Area $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $25,000 status: Proposed Traffic Impact Fee Fund $25,000 description: Appendix A • S Traffic volumes on the street system in the vicinity of Greenburg Road, North Dakota Street, Tiedeman Avenue and Tigard Street have resulted in frequent traffic backups on all four streets. The skewed intersection of North Dakota Street with Greenburg Road and the railroad crossings on Tiedeman Avenue and North Dakota Street exacerbate the traffic congestion problem. The Tigard Street/Tiedeman Avenue intersection needs turning lanes for more efficient traffic flow. This project provides funding for a study to determine how to improve traffic flow through this area, expecially during peak travel hours. The study will include the feasibility of closing one of the railroad crossings and potential street realignments to improve traffic circulation throughout the entire area. It will also include evaluation of the signal timing at the Greenburg Road/Tiedeman Avenue intersection to determine if any changes should be performed for better traffic movement through that intersection. The findings of the study is expected to provide the basis for future improvements in this area to improve traffic flow and enhance traffic and pedestrian safety throughout the streets in this area. Walnut Street (116th to Tiedeman Avenue) ROW Acquisition $40,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $40,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding to acquire the remaining rights-of-way for the improvements of Walnut Street between 116th and Tiedeman Avenue. The design has been completed and most of the rights-of-way have been acquired in FY 2004-05. Acquisition of the rights-of-way is necessary for future widening and reconstruction of the street. The narrow two-lane street is proposed to be widened to a three-lane roadway with curb, sidewalk and bike lanes. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in FY 2009-10. Walnut Street Improvements (135th to 121st Avenue) $20,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Gas Tax Fund $20,000 status: Proposed description: This project is the last phase of a three-phase project funded through the Washington County MSTIP3. The first phase improved the Walnut/121st Avenue intersection, which was completed by the County in August 2001. The second phase constructed the Walnut/Gaarde Street intersection and its approaches and installed a traffic signal at the intersection. The project was completed by the City also in 2001. Phase 3 is constructed by the County, which began in the spring of 2005. The project widens Walnut Street between 135th and 121st Avenue to provide a 44-foot paved roadway that consists of two travel lanes, a center-turn lane and two bike lanes. Planter strips are also installed wherever possible. The project also reconfigures and separates the Walnut Lane/135th Avenue intersection from Walnut Street. Certain improvements, such as extension of sanitary sewer lines, upgrades of waterlines and installation of pavement overlay, are also included in the project and are funded by the City. The construction is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2006. • Appendix A • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:28:58 AM Storm Drainage System Program $781,000 79th Avenue Storm Drainage Outfall $90,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $90,000 _ _ _ _ status: Proposed _ _ description: - - - This project constructs approximately 1,000 feet of 18-inch storm drain line east of 79th Avenue for discharge of storm runoff into Fanno Creek. The project also installs an energy dissipator manhole and riprap for water to flow through prior to discharging to the creek. Construction of this project will be combined with the 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall project to minimize impacts to private properties. A 20-foot utility easement will be dedicated by a property owner for construction and maintenance of the storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes. Completion of this project will provide a direct point of connection for future upgrades of the storm drainage system on the street. Derry Dell Creek at Fanno Creek and Walnut St - Culvert Improvements $125,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Quality/Quantity $125,000 status: Proposed Fund description: This project will replace two existing culverts: the first one is at Derry Dell Creek as it crosses under Walnut Street, and the second one is under an existing sanitary sewer main at the outfall of Derry Dell Creek into Fanno Creek. This project includes the design of both culvert replacements in preparation for construction of the project scheduled for the summer of 2008. Completion of the project will increase capacity of the culvert at Walnut Street to resolve flooding and maintenance issues and allow fish passage into derry Dell Creek. This project will aso accomplish culvert replacement goals identified in the Healthy Streams Plan. Derry Dell Creek Wetland & Vegetated Corridor Enhancement $3,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $3,000 status: Proposed description: In FY 2004-05, the City enhanced wetland areas and the vegetated corridor along Derry Dell Creek at 110th Avenue. The enhancement is required by the DSL, the Corps of Engineers, and CWS due to impacts generated by the installation of a sanitary sewer pipe across the creek. Intallation of planting materials was completed in that fiscal year. In FY 2005-06, the City provided funding to hire a consultant to perform field inspections and monitor the growth of the vegetation. A report has been submitted to the agencies describing the site conditions and proposing a plan to maintain the current growing rate. This project provides funding for the second year report, including field inspections, monitoring and reporting to the agencies. Funding will also be allocated in FY 2007-08, to complete the monitoring work as required by the permit. Durham Rd at 108th Ave - Stream Bank Stablization $150,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $150,000 status: Proposed description: A creek bank and a portion of the segmental-block retaining wall south of Durham Road have been eroded and undermined due to high stream flow oufalling from a 36-inch culvert under the street. The contributing factors to the problems are a large boulder, which was placed in the middle of the stream, and the culvert alignment, which does not line up with the creek. This project removes and reconstructs a portion of the retaining wall, removes the existing boulder, and extends the culvert for proper alignment with the creek. Preliminary design has been completed. Environmental permits are now being acquired because the project site is located within a sensitive area according to the City's Wetlands and Stream Corridors map. Contruction will occur between July and October to meet the in-water work window requirement. Bank Appendix A • • stabilization is the responsibility of adjacent property owners. Gaarde Street Phase II Wetland Mitigation $3,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $3,000 status: Proposed description: This project provides funding to inspect and report mitigation measures required by the DSL, the Corps of Engineers and CWS to offset the loss of 0.009 acres of wetland associated with the widening of Gaarde Street. The offsite mitigation area is along the Fanno Creek Greenway immediately north of Tigard Street. The vegetated enhancement area is located along the Fanno Creek trail south of the Burnham Business Park. Initial vegetation management and plant installation were completed in FY 2004-05. In FY 2005-06, the City provided funding for field inspections and preparation of the first monitoring report to be submitted to the agencies. The proposed funding is for the second year report, including field inspections, monitoring and reporting to the agencies. Funding will also be allocated in FY 2007-08, to complete the last report as required by the permit. Highland Drive (109th Ave to 500' west of Greens Way) - Storm Drain Pipe Replacement $25,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $25,000 status: Proposed description: The existing storm drainage system on Highland Drive from 109th Ave to 500 feet west of Greens Way consists of 12-inch pipes that have been crushed in numerous places and are in need of repair. This project includes installation of new pipes, manholes, and catch basins. This project was funded in FY 2005-06 from the Storm Sewer Fund to improve the existing storm drainage system. The work that will be performed in conjunction with the new pavement overlay also is scheduled for this street. The overlay work is funded from the Street Maintenance Fee Fund. The proposed funding for the storm drain replacement is required to complete the remaining work, which is anticipated to be carried over into FY 2006-07. Hiteon Creek Riparian Enchancement - Phase 2 Construction $90,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Quality/Quantity $90,000 status: Proposed Fund description: This project constructs riparian enhancement features, including modifications of riparian buffer areas, to promote treatment of high flows. It also includes placement of large woody debris and minor channel improvements. This project addresses the "Stormwater Outfall Retrofit" goal identified in the Healthy Streams Plan prepared by Clean Water Services. Pine Street Storm Drainage System Upgrade $95,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $95,000 status: Proposed description: This project upgrades the existing storm drainage system on Pine Street, which is shallow and undersized and is not able to collect storm ruoff from surrounding properties. Flooding has occurred (at least in the yard of one house) and a temporary ditch has been installed to handle the overflow of the runoff. The FY 2005-06 CIP provided funding to resolve the problem by replacing the existing 6-inch pipe with 12-inch, and installing manholes and catch basins for frequent collections of storm runoff. The funding proposed for FY 2006-07 is required to complete the construction, which begins in late FY 2005-06. Red Rock Creek (at Dartmouth Street) Culvert Replacement $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Quality/Quantity $100,000 status: Proposed Fund description: Appendix A • • As part of the 72nd Ave/Dartmouth Street Intersection improvements, the Red Rock Creek culvert under 72nd Ave will be improved to increase capacity, allow fish passage and stabilize the creek channel near the intersection. Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $100,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Storm water Fund $100,000 status: Proposed description: This-yearly program-addresses-minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort by the City's Public Works department. The Storm Drainage Major -- - --- Maintenance Program in FY 2006-07 includes projects located at various locations in the City. Appendix A s • Report - Project Details by Type created on: CIP Year: FY 2006-07 5/5/2006 11:38:36 AM Water System Program $7,052,470 550' Zone Beaverton Connection $200,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $84,000 status: Proposed Water SDC Fund $116,000 description: The City's water system is currently connected with the City of Beaverton (Joint Water Commission) in the 410' elevation zone. This project will create a second connection to serve the 550' elevation zone. This project may also allow the City to delay construction of a 550' zone reservoir on the north side of Bull Mountain for several years. 550' Zone Improvements: 10 MG transfer pump station upgrade $50,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $50,000 status: Proposed description: The existing transfer pump station, located on the 10 MG reservoir site at Bull Mountain Road/125th Avenue, serves both the 550-foot and 713-foot service zones. The Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study identified a need to replace this pump station with one that would provide a higher pumping capacity to both service zones. Construction of this improvement increases pumping capacity from 2,000 gpm to 3,300 gpm for the 713-foot service zone. The pump station will also provide 3,900 gpm to the 550-Foot Zone Reservoir No. 2 listed previously. Along with the piping improvements listed below, the existing pump station at the Canterbury site (Pump Station No. 1) will be abandoned. 550' Zone Improvements: Reservoir No. 2 Supply Lines $200,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $200,000 status: Proposed description: This improvement is needed for existing and future needs in both transmission and distribution to serve the new reservoir and pump station upgrade projects listed above. A new line will be constructed between the new transfer pump station and Reservoir No. 2, ranging in size from 18- inch to 24-inch. Design work will include selection of the most feasible route for this line. 550' Zone Reservoir No. 2 $500,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $500,000 status: Proposed description: This reservoir will be located on Bull Mountain and will serve the south and eastern portions of the 550-foot pressure zone. Constructing this reservoir will eliminate some of the demand currently supplied by the 713-Foot pressure zone. Supply to the reservoir will be provided through the transfer pump station upgrade and supply piping projects separately listed. ASR Expansion Studies $400,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $400,000 status: Proposed description: The City's hydrogeologist of record will assist Staff in locating potential sites for additional aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells. In addition, test wells must be drilled by a qualified well driller in order for the hydrogeologist to determine suitability of the well for ASR purposes. Therefore, these studies will include both consulting services and drilling services. Burnham Street - 16-inch Waterline Replacement (Tie to Street Project) $100,000 Appendix A • • cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $50,000 status: Proposed Water SDC Fund $50,000 description: Burnham Street is a major collector and is subject for reconstruction in FY 07/08. The installation of a 16-inch main is necessary based upon the Water Distribution System Hydraulic Plan. The street project will provide a good opportunity for the water main work to be completed. _ Defective_Meter Replacements (1 1/2 -Inch & Larger) $40,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $40,000 status: Yearly Program description: This has been one of the long-term projects for the Public Works Department. The large meter replacement program is for the systematic testing, repair and/or replacement of all 1 1/2-inch and larger water meters. Meters of this size have developed problems where actual water flows are inaccurately measured; most of the time, the volume of water is under-reported. The result is that water customers could be using more water than they are being assessed. Testing and or replacement of these water meters have proven to make financial sense in that the investment is recouped by the additional revenues received due to accurate meters. Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $15,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $15,000 status: Yearly Program description: This has been another one of the long-term projects for the Public Works Department and is similar to the program for 1 1/2-inch meter replacements. But this program is for the smaller meters. Meters of this size have also developed problems where actual water flows are inaccurately measured; most of the time, the volume of water is under-reported. The result is that water customers could be using more water than they are being assessed. Testing and or replacement of these water meters have proven to make financial sense in that the investment is recouped by the additional revenues received due to accurate meters. Lake Oswego Feasibility Study $130,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $130,000 status: Proposed description: This project will involve an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the City of Lake Oswego to determine the feasibility of the two cities becoming partners to expand the Lake Oswego treatment plant and improve transmission lines between the two cities to enable Tigard to obtain long term water supply from Lake Oswego's system. This option will be considered by Council along with the other source options Tigard is considering. Menlor Reservoir Recirculation $45,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund . $45,000 status: Proposed description: Menlor reservoir is developing a water quality issue in that, at certain times of the year, water does not circulate throught the reservoir thus allowing chlorine residuals to diminish to below state standards. This project will install a small circulatory pump system that will address this problem. Meter Installations $60,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $60,000 status: Yearly Program description: This on-going program ties in with the Water Service Installations program. When new water customers, or existing customers who need an additional water service, apply for a new service, Public Works staff install the service line and will set the new meter. Appendix A • • Replace Well House #2 (Gaarde Site) $70,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $70,000 status: Proposed description: The existing well house at Well #2 is approximately 40 years old and needs to be replaced and upgraded for security reasons. Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply $430,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $430,000 status: Proposed description: As part of obtaining a long-term water source for the Tigard service area, the City is partnering with other Joint Water Commission (JWC) owners for the Scoggins Dam Raise feasibility report. Raising the dam would increase the storage volume of Hagg Lake and would therefore provide more capacity for JWC member cities. Secure 550' Reservoir #1 Site $3,000,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $2,700,000 status: Proposed Water SDC Fund $300,000 description: This reservoir is shown in the City's Water System Master Plan and will be located on the north side of Bull Mountain. These funds will be used to locate and secure a suitable site. Secure 550' Reservoir #2 Site $1,200,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water CIP Fund $1,200,000 status: Proposed description: The Public Works Department is in the process of securing a permanent location for the 550-foot zone Reservoir No. 2. The general location of this reservoir will be near Bull Mountain Road, west of Greenfield Drive. Telemetry Upgrade $200,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $200,000 status: Proposed description: The existing telemetry system is out of date and the software and hardware are no longer supported by the manufacturer or local representatives. The City has also experienced failures of controllers at various sites due to the aging of the overall system. Replacement of controllers can take up to three weeks, which is not adequate for the City's need to have continuous monitoring ability of the water system. The upgrade process will enable the City to have up to date technology that is more user friendly, and to explore modes of communication other than the phone line system currently used. Funds for 06/07 would only be used if the project is not 100% complete by June 30, 2006. Walnut Street (121st to Tiedeman) Relocate 12-Inch Line w/Street Construction $39,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $39,000 status: Proposed description: This project is in conjunction with the Walnut Street improvements to be completed by Washington County and the City over the next two years. Due to grade and alignment issues the existing 12" water line needs to be upgraded. Water Line Replacement-Walnut (135th to 121st) $44,720 Appendix A cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $22,360 status: Under Construction Water SDC Fund $22,360 description: This project is in conjunction with the Walnut Street improvments to be jointly completed by Washington County and the City. Funds for this year would only be used if the street project were not 100% complete by June 30, 2006. _ Water Main Oversizing____ __ __ $95,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water SDC Fund $95,000 status: Yearly Program description: During the course of the year the City may find the need to upsize a planned pipeline through a new development, thus accomplishing an identified capital improvement as listed in the "Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study - May 2000." Water Main Replacements $78,750 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $78,750 status: Yearly Program description: This on-going program is based on the needs identified in the "Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study - May 2000", and is for the routine replacement of leaking, damaged and older water mains throughout the water system. In most cases the existing mains have adequate capacity and will be replaced with the same diameter water mains. This program is also for the completion of loops in the system to maintain hydraulic efficiencies. Water Reservoir Seismic Upgrade Evaluation $70,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $70,000 status: Proposed description: This is the beginning of an expected two-year program that will review all of Tigard's water reservoirs for conformity to current seismic standards and recommend upgrades where needed. Water Service Installations $10,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $10,000 status: Yearly Program description: This is another long-term program for the department. Each year the City adds new customers to the system through individual building permits or additional water services. Customers apply for a new water service, and Public Works staff installs the service line and will set the meter (see Meter Installations line item). Water Site Security Upgrades $75,000 cip year: FY 2006-07 Water Fund $75,000 status: Proposed description: This project will accomplish the water site security upgrades that were identified in the PW Vulnerability Assessment and Emergency Response Plan. The security upgrades will include improvements to such things as access, fencing, intrusion alarms, and monitoring. Appendix A • City of Tigard Five-Year Community Investment Program Plan (FY 2006-07 through FY 2010-11) Community Investment Program The City's Community Investment Program (CIP) consists of capital improvements that result in permanent additions to the City's fixed assets. These capital improvements are typically of major importance and cost. They include but are not limited to construction and acquisition of new buildings, additions to or renovations of existing buildings, construction, reconstruction, and upgrading of streets,water, and sanitary sewer facilities, drainage improvements, demolition of existing structures, land purchases, major equipment purchases, and studies necessary to perform the actual project. A capital improvement should possess the following characteristics: • It serves an essential public purpose. • It has a long, useful life or significantly extends the useful life of an existing fixed asset. • It is comparatively expensive and is not of routine nature. • It is fixed in place or stationary. • It is related to government functions and expenditures. • It is a usual responsibility of a local government. The City of Tigard's Five-Year Community Investment Program Plan The City of Tigard's CIP provides a 5-year plan for major capital expenditures that matches available resources with project needs. The CIP lists each proposed capital project, the time frame in which the project needs to be undertaken, the financial requirements of the project, and proposed methods of financing. The 5- year plan describes the first year's projects in detail and lists projects for subsequent fiscal years. However, the projects shown after the first year are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP is reviewed and approved each year by the City Council. The program is developed through a process separate from the City's Operating Budget formulation Appendix B The Five-Year Community Investment Program Plan Page 1 of 2 • • process. It is developed in close coordination with the City's Finance Director and is formulated early in the fiscal year so that it can be integrated into the City's overall budget process for approval. The program submitted to the City's Budget Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council is a 5-year program with the first year's program described in detail. _While the program lists projects for subsequent fiscal years, the projects shown are tentative and are subject to change during the formulation process for each specific budget year. The CIP, through the adoption process, establishes the budget and projects for the upcoming fiscal year and serves as a planning document to guide the infrastructure improvements over the following 4 years. During each budget year's update, the revenue estimates are adjusted, the project cost estimates are reviewed, and the program and project priorities are re-evaluated based on changes in City plans, citizen input, and additional data which may become available. The Five-Year Community Investment Program projects are shown in the following appendices: ♦ Appendix B-1: City Facilities System Program ♦ Appendix B-2: Parks System Program ♦ Appendix B-3: Sanitary Sewer System Program ♦ Appendix B-4: Street System Program ♦ Appendix B-5: Storm Drainage System Program ♦ Appendix B-6: Water System Program is\eng\gus\2006-07 c p\appendix b-five-year capital improvement program ty 2006-11 doc Appendix B The Five-Year Community Investment Program Plan Page 2 of 2 City Facilities System Program FY 06-07 Fund Name Project Name Facility Fund. Grand Total City Facility Security Upgrades $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Commuter Rail Station Enhancement $ 150,000. $ 150,000 Consolidation of.Public Works Facilities (Water Building) $ 530,000 $ 530,000 Library Parking Lot Expansion $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Library Projects - Houghton - Root Donations $ 427,697 $ 427,697 Library Property-Voluntary Cleanup $ 26,000 $ 26,000 Niche Analysis $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Outside Entrance to PC-4 conference room $ 15,000 $ 15,000 PD Underground Storage Tank Upgrade $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Police & Records Storage Remodel $ 15,000 $ 15,000 • Senior Center Remodel & Seismic Upgrade $. 150,000 $ 150,000 Grand Total $ 1,593,697 _ $ 1,593,697 City Facilities System Program FY 07-08 • Fund Name Project Name Facility Fund Grand Total Miscellaneous City Facilities Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Repaint City Hall, Permit Center and Police Dept. $ 40,000 $ 40,000 City Facility Security Upgrades • . $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Police & Records Storage Remodel $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Senior Center Remodel and Seismic Upgrade $ 1,050,000 $ 1,050,000 Water Building UST Decommission $ 45,000 $ 45,000 • Grand Total $ 1,395,000 $ 1,395,000 City Facilities System Program FY 08-09 Fund Name • Project Name Facility Fund Grand Total Demolition of Surplus Public Works Facilities $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Miscellaneous City Facilities Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 City Facility Security Upgrades $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Grand Total • $ 160,000 $ 160,000 Appendix B-1 • City Facilities System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name Project Name Facility Fund Grand Total City Facility Security Upgrades $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Miscellaneous City Facilities Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Grand Total $ 110,000 $ 110,000 City Facilities System Program FY 10-11 Fund Name Project Nafrie Facility Fund Grand Total • City Facility Security Upgrades $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Miscellaneous City Facilities Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 ,Grand Total $ 110,000 $ 110,000 • Appendix B-1 Parks System Program FY 06-07 Fund Name • Parks Capital Project Name Fund Grand Total Tree Replacement/Planting $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Washington Square Regional Center Trail $ 430,020 $ 430,020 BPA Trail Feasibility Study $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Clute Property House Demolition $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Fanno Creek Trail (Hall to Fanno Creek) $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Land Acquisition $ 579,513 $ 579,513 Northview Park-Shelter& Path Installation $ 25,000. $ 25,000 - Skate Park Development& Construction $ 426,300 $ 426,300 • Tualatin River/Cook Park Trail from Garden to Bridge $ 97,530 $ 97,530 Fanno Creek Trail Master Plan $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Parkland Acquisition- Downtown $ ' 100,000 $ 100,000 Grand Total $ 1,828,363 $ 1,828,363 Parks System Program FY 07-08 Fund Name Parks Capital Project Name Fund Grand Total Tree Replacement/Planting $ 50,000 $ 50,000. Grand Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 • Parks System Program FY 08-09 • Fund Name Parks Capital Project Name Fund Grand Total Tree Replacement/Planting $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Grand Total • $ 50,000 $ 50,000 • Appendix B-2 • Parks System Program FY 09-10 • Fund Name Parks Capital • Project Name • Fund Grand Total Tree Replacement/Planting $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Neighborhood Park Near Templeton Elem. School $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Grand Total $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Pr Program - Parks System rogram FY 10 11 Fund Name Parks Capital Project Name Fund Grand Total Tree Replacement/Planting $ 50,000 $ . 50,000 Grand Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 • • • • • • Appendix B-2 Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 06-07 • Fund Name Sanitary Sewer Project Name Fund Grand Total Benchview Terrace Sanitary Sewer Access Road $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 79th Ave Sanitary Sewer Outfall $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Bonita Road at Milton Court $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Commercial Street Sanitary Sewer Upgrades (Lincoln to Maint St) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 McDonald Street(at Hall Boulevard) Sanitary Sewer Connection $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Red Rock Greek Sanitary Sewer Repair $ 50,000 $ 50,000 • Sanitary Sewer Master Plan $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Grand Total $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 07-08' Fund Name _ • Sanitary Sewer Grand Total Project Name Fund Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Citywide Sanitary sewer Extension Program $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 68th Parkway Sanitary Sewer Repair $ 50,000 $ 50,000 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall . $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Commercial St Sanitary Sewer Extension (95th to Lincoln) $ 75,000 $ 75,000 -- • Grand Total $ 1,275,000 $ 1,275,000 • Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 08--09 Fund Name Project Name Sanitary Sewer Grand Total Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Grant St Sanitary Sewer $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Grand Total $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Appendix B-3 • • Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name Sanitary Sewer Project Name Fund Grand Total Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension $ 500,000 $ 500,000 • Highway 217 Sanitary Sewer Upgrade $ 500,000 $. 500,000 Grand Total $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 10-11 • Fund Name Sanitary Sewer . Project Name Fund Grand Total Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 • Hunziker Sanitary Sewer Upgrade $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Grand Total $ 600,000` $ 600,000 • • • • • • • Appendix B-3 Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name Sanitary Sewer Project Name Fund Grand Total Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance .$ 100,000 $ 100,000 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Highway 217 Sanitary Sewer Upgrade $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Grand Total $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Sanitary Sewer System Program FY 10-11 Fund Name • Sanitary Sewer Project Name Fund Grand Total Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Hunziker Sanitary Sewer Upgrade $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Grand Total $ 600,000 $ 600,000 • • • • • Appendix B-3 • Street'System Program FY 06-07 • Fund-Name . Traffic Impact Street Fee Fund- Tigard Maintenance Traffic Impact Urban Triangle LID Project Name Gas Tax Fund Fee (SMF) Fee Fund Services #1 Fund Grand Total Bull Mountain/Roshak Road Intersection - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) $ 210,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,160,000 Sidewalk Improvements $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Signalization $ 200,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 Bull Mountain Road (at Hwy 99W) Right-Turn Lane Widening $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Design $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $. 25,000 Durham Rod/108th Avenue Intersection Signalization $ - $ - .$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ magi Hall Boulevard (at McDonald Street) Right-turn Lane Widening $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 125, Hall Boulevard Crosswalk (at Fanno Creek Pathway) $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 Hall Boulevard Sidewalk (Spruce St to 850' south) $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Hall Boulevard/Wall Street Intersection - Phase 2 $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ 700,000 Walnut Street Improvements (135th to 121st Avenue) $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 Ash Avenue Connection Feasibility Study(Fanno Creek to Scoffins St) $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Ash Avenue Construction (Burnham Street to Railroad Tracks) $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Burnham Street Improvements $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 Commercial Street(at Main Street) Intersection Treatments $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 Commercial Street Improvements (Lincoln Avenue to Main Street) $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Hall Blvd and Highway 99W Gateway Treatments $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 Hall Blvd Half-street Improvements (Fanno Creek to 450 feet north) $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ $ 150,000 Highway 99W Corridor Improvement& Management Plan $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 Main Street Safety Improvements $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ..75,0 Tigard Triangle Street Improvements LID No.1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,750,000 $ 1,750,0 Traffic Improvement Analysis -Greenburg Rd/Tiedeman Ave/North Dakota St./Tigard St. Area $ 25,000 $ $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 Walnut Street(116th to Tiedeman Avenue) ROW Acquisition $ 40,000 $ - $ - $. - $ - $ 40,000 Grand Total $ 2,535,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 6,860,000 Appendix B-4 Street System Program FY 07-08 Fund Name Street Traffic Impact Maintenance Traffic Impact Fee Fund- Project Name Gas Tax Fund Fee (SMF) Fee Fund Urban Services Grand Total Sidewalk Improvements $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 • PMMP (Pavement Major Maintenance Program) $ - $ 775,000 $ - $ - $ 775,000 72nd Ave/Dartmouth St Intersection $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 City/County Joint Projects (?) $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Greenburg Rd (Washington Sq Dr to Tiedeman Ave)(MTIP grant • $660,000) $ - $ - $ 330,000 $ - $ 330,000 Hall Blvd (at McDonald) Right-turn Lane $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ • - $ 75,000 • Hall BIvd/Wail St Intersection - Phase 2 $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Ash Avenue Construction (Burnham Street to Railroad Tracks) $ 70,000 $ - $ = $ - $ 70,000 Burnham Street Improvements $ 800,000 $ • - $ 1,100,000 $ - $ 1,900,000 Burnham Street/Hall Blvd Gateway Treatments $ 60,000 $ - $ \ - $ - $ 60,000 Hall Blvd. half-street Improvements (Fanno Creek to 450 feet north) $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Main/Tigard Street Intersection Signalization $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ - $ 175,000 Grand Total $ 1,030,000 $ 775,000 $ 1,895,000 $ 150,000 $ 3,850,000 j Street System Program FY 08-09 . Fund Name Traffic Impact Street Fee Fund- Maintenance Traffic Impact Urban Underground Project Name Gas Tax Fund Fee (SMF) Fee Fund Services Utility Fund Grand Total • Sidewalk Improvements $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ ' - $ 75,000 PMMP (Pavement Major Maintenance Program) $ - $ 625,000 $ • - $ - $ , - $ 625,000 Scoffin/Hall/Hunziker Intersection Realignment- Design $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 Greenburg Rd (Washington Sq Dr to Tiedeman Ave)(MTIP grant $660,000) $ - $ - , $ • 330,000 $ - $ - $ 330,000 Hall Blvd/Wall St Intersection - Phase 2 $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ 15,000 Joint Projects between Washington County & City $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ , - $ 200,000 North Dakota (Greenburg to 95th) Construction $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Sattler Rd (96th Ave) Crosswalk Lights $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1 - $ 65,000 Main Street/Fanno Creek Trail Intersection Treatments $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 Main Street/Hwy 99W Gateway Treatments $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ • - $ - $ 120,000 Walnut Street Reconstruction (116th to Tiedeman Ave) $ - $ - $ 1;700,000 $ - $ ; 200,000 $ 1,900,000 Grand Total $ 435,000 $ 725,000 $ 2,145,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 3,705,000 A-_._-1:__ D A • Street System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name Street Traffic Impact Maintenance Traffic Impact Fee Fund— Project Name Gas Tax Fund Fee(SMF) Fee Fund. Urban Services Grand Total Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) $ - $ 525;000 $ - $ - $ 525,000 Sidewalk Improvements $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Hall Blvd/Wall St Intersection - Phase 2 $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ $ 10,000 Joint Projects between Washington County& City $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 North Dakota(Greenburg to 95th Ave) Reconstruction $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 Walnut Street(135th to 121st Ave) $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 Grand Total . $ 350,000 $ 675,000 $ 10,000 $ 250,000 _ $ 1,285,000 • Street System Program FY 10-11 Fund Name Street Traffic Impact Maintenance Traffic impact Fee Fund— Project Name Gas Tax Fund Fee (SMF) Fee Fund Urban Services Grand Total Pavement Major Maintenance Program (PMMP) . $ - $ 675,000 $ - $ - $ 675,000 . Sidewalk Improvements • $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 Hall Blvd/Wall St Intersection - Phase 2 $ - $ • - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Joint Projects between Washington County & City $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 121 Ave (Gaarde to Walnut Street) . $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 • Greenburg Rd (Washington Sq Dr to Tiedeman Ave)(MTIP grant$660,000) $ - $ - $ 3,700,000 $ - $ 3,700,000 ,Grand Total $ 75,000 $ 675,000 $ 3,910,000 $ 250,000 $ 4,910,000 • • • • Appendix B-4 • Storm Drainage System Program FY 06-07 Fund Name Water Quality/ Stormwater Project Name Quantity Fund Fund Grand Total Derry Dell Creek Wetland &Vegetated Corridor,Enhancement $ - $" 3,000 $ 3,000 Gaarde Street Phase II Wetland Mitigation $ - $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $ - $ 100,000 $ . 100,000 79th Avenue Storm Drainage Outfall $ - $ 90,000 $ 90;000 Durham Rd at 108th Ave-Stream Bank Stablization $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Highland Drive (109th Ave to 500'west of Greens Way) -Storm Drain Pipe Replaeement $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 • Hiteon Creek Riparian Enchancement- Phase 2 Construction $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 - Pine Street Storm D(ainage System Upgrade $ $ 95,000 $ 95,000 . Red Rock Creek(at Dartmouth Street) Culvert Replacement $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Derry Dell Creek at Fanno Creek and Walnut St-Culvert • Improvements $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 ,Grand Total _ $ 315,000 $ 466,000 $ 781,000 • • Storm Drainage System Program FY 07-08 • Fund Name Water Quality/ Stormwater Project Name Quantity Fund Fund Grand Total Derry Dell Creek Wetland &Vegetated Corridor Enhancement $ - $ 3,000 $ 3,000 • Gaarde Street Phase 2 Wetland Mitigation $ - $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 79th Ave Storm Drainage Outfall $ - $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Cascade Ave Storm Drain Overflow $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Commercial St Culvert Replacement at Transit Center Site $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Derry Dell Creek at Fanno Creek&Walnut St-Culvert Improvement $ 375,000 $ - $ 375,000 Derry Dell Creek Tree Planting $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Hiteon Creek Tree Planting $ - $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Red Rock Creek (at 72nd Ave) Culvert Replacement $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 Stormwater Outfall Retrofits $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 Grand Total $ 555,000 $ 296,000 $ 851,000 Appendix B-5 • Storm Drainage System Program FY 08-09 Fund Name Water Qualitjr/ Stormwater Grand Total Quantity Fund Fund Project Name Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Water Quality Enhancement $• 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Cascade Ave Storm Drain Overflow $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Commercial St Culvert Replacement $ - $ 50,000 $ 50;000 Community Tree Planting • $ 85,000 $ - .$ 85,000 . Culvert.Replacements $ 130,000 $ - $ 130,000 Red Rock Creek(at 72nd) Culvert Replacement $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 • • Riparian Restoration and Enhancement $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Stormwater Outfall Retrofits $ 90,000 $ . - $ . 90,000 Grand Total $ 505,000 -$ 250,000 $ 755,000 Storm Drainage System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name Water Quality/ Stormwater Project Name Quantity Fund Fund . Grand Total Water Quality Enhancement $ 25,000. $ - $ 25,000 Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Community Tree Planting $ 85,000 $ - $ 85,000 . • Culvert Replacement $ 130,000 $ - $ 130,000 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Stormwater Outfall Retrofits $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 Grand Total $ . 380,000 $ 100,000 $ 480,000 • • Appendix B-5 Storm Drainage System Program FY 10-11 • Fund Name 'Water Quality/ Stormwater Project Name Quantity Fund Fund Grand Total Storm Drainage Major Maintenance $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Community Tree Planting $ 85,000 $ - $ 85,000 Stormwater Outfall Retrofits $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 ,Grand Total $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 275,000 • • • • Appendix B-5 Water System Program FY 06-07 Fund Name Water CIP Water SDC Project Name Fund Water Fund. Fund Grand Total Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Meter Installations $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 Telemetry Upgrade $ - $. 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Water Main Replacements $ - $ 78,750 $ - $. 78,750 Water Service Installations $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Replace Well House#2 (Gaarde Site) $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 Walnut Street(121st to Tiedeman) Relocate 12-Inch Line w/Street Construction $ - $ 39,000 $ - $ 39,000 Water Maln-Oversizing $ - $ - $ 95,000 $ 95,000 • Water Reservoir Seismic Upgrade Evaluation $ = $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 550'Zone Beaverton Connection $ - $ 84,000 $ 116,000 $ 200,000 Defective Meter Replacements (1 1/2 -Inch & Larger) $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply $ 430,000 $ - $ - $ 430,000 550'Zone Improvements: 10 MG transfer pump station upgrade $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 550'Zone Improvements: Reservoir No. 2 Supply Lines $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 550'Zone Reservoir No. 2 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 ASR Expansion Studies . $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 400,000 Burnham Street- 16-inch Waterline Replacement(Tie to Street Project) $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 Lake Oswego Feasibility Study $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ 130,000 Menlor Reservoir Recirculation $ - $ 45,000 $ - $ 45,000 Secure 550' Reservoir#1 Site $ 2,700,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 Secure 550' Reservoir#2 Site $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 Water Line Replacement-Walnut(135th to 121st) $ - $ 22,360 $ 22,360 $ 44,720 --- • Water Site Security Upgrades $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 � High Tor Pump Station Rebuild . $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 SDC Methodology Update $ - $ - $ .25,000 $ 25,000 ,Grand Total S $ 5,910,000 $ 859,110 $ 608,360 $ 7,377,470 • • . • Appendix B-6 i Water System Program FY 07-08 • i i Fund Name Water CIP Water SDC Project Name Fund Water Fund Fund Grand Total , Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Meter Installations $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 . Water Main Replacements $ - $ 78,750 $ - $ 78,750 Water Service Installations $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Water Main Oversizing $ - $ - $ 75,000 . $ 75,000 Water Reservoir Seismic Upgrade Evaluation $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 Defective Meter Replacements (1 1/2-Inch & Larger) $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 JWC Raw Water Pipeline $ 528,020 $ - $ - $ 528,020 Scoggins Ram/Tualatin Water Supply $ 620,000 $ - $ - $ 620,000 . • 550' Zone Improvements: 10 MG transfer pump station upgrades $ 1,600,000 $ - $ - $ 1,600,000 550' Zone Improvements: Reservoir No. 2 $ 2,550,000 $ - $ - $ 2,550,000 550'Zone Improvements: Reservoir No.'2 Supply Lines $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 ASR 1: Energy Saving Upgrades $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 ASR 3 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 ASR Expansion Studies $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 400,000 Burnham Street- 16-Inch Waterline Replacement(Tie to Street Project) $ - $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 260,000 On-site Chlorine Generation at ASR#1 $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000 Water Site Security Upgrades $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Grand Total $ 7,698,020 $ 583,750 $ 205,000 $ 8,486,770 f • . I . Appendix B-6 ; . • Water System Program FY 08-09 • • Fund Name • Water CIP Water SDC • • Project Name Fund Water Fund Fund Grand Total Meter Installations $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 Water Main Replacements $ - $ 78,750 $ - $ 78,760 Water Service Installations $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Water Main Oversizing $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 JWC Raw Water Pipeline $ 1,402,553 $ - $ - $ 1,402,553 Defective.Meter Replacements $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Defective Meter Replacements(1 1/2 inch & Larger) $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 . Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply . $ 640,000 $ - $ $ 640,000 550' Zone" Canterbury Loop $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 • 550' Zone 18" Canterbury Supply Line • $ 800,000 $ . - $ - $ 800,000 550'Zone Improvements: 10 MG transfer pump station upgrades $ 401,000 $ - $. - $ 401,000 550'Zone Improvements: Reservoir No. 2 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 550'Zone Improvements: Reservoir No. 2 Supply Lines $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 ASR 3 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 Burnham Street- 16-inch Waterline Replacement(Tie to Street Projec $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 Walnut Street(121st to Tiedeman): Relocate 12-inch Waterline $ . - $ 116,000 $ - $ 116,000 Grand Total $ 6,343,553 $ 369,750. $ • 125,000 $ 6,838,303 , e Appendix B-6 . .. Water System Program FY 09-10 Fund Name • Water CIP Water SDC Project Name Fund Water Fund Fund Grand Total Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 Meter Installations $ - $ . 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 Water Main Replacements $ - $ 78,750 $ - $ 78,750 Water Service Installations $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Defective Meter Replacements (1 1/2-inch & Larger) $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Water Main Oversizing $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 JWC Raw Water Pipeline $ 2,970,112 $ - $ - $ 2,970,112 Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply $ 658,000 $ - $ - $ 658,000 550' Reservoir No. 1 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 550' Zone 12" Canterbury Loop $ 120,000 $ - $ - $,, 120,000 550'Zone 18" Canterbury Supply Line $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 ASR 4 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ • 1,000,000 Main Line Improvements from Beaverton 550' Connection $ - $ 84,000 $ 116,000 $ 200,000 Walnut Street(121st to Tiedeman): Relocate 12-inch Waterline $ - $ 39,000 $ - $ 39,000 Grand Total $ 5,248,112 $ 326,750 $ 191,000 $ 5,765,862 Water System Program FY 10-11 Fund Name Water CIP Water SDC Project Name Fund Water Fund Fund Grand Total Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 • Meter Installations $ - $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 -' Water Main Replacements $ - $ 78,750 $ - $ 78,750 , Water Service Installations $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 10,000 Defective Meter Replacements (1 1/2-inch & Larger) $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Water Main Oversizing $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 JWC Raw Water Pipeline $ 2,970,112 $ - $ - $ 2,970,112 Scoggins Dam/Tualatin Water Supply $ 1,016,000 $ - $ - $ 1,016,000 550' Reservoir No. 1 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 ASR 4 $ 300,000 $ - $ $ 300,000 Main Line Improvements from Beaverton 550' Connection $ _ - $ 84,000 $ 116,000 $ 200,000 Grand Total $ 6,286,112 $ 287,750 $ 191,000 $ 6,764,862 -j Appendix B-6 S • • .