Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12/20/2004 - Packet
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AGENDA Alltba *Inv 41 City of Tigard Co»nsrnity Dezdopnrnt TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION S'Japing A BeterConmmity DECEMBER 20, 2004 7:00 p.m. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER—TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2004-00003/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2004-00002 PLAN & CODE AMENDMENT INCORPORATING REVISED FEMA REQUIREMENTS REQUEST: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has required the City, as a condition of continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet NFIP standards. Therefore, to meet these standards, the City proposes to amend Chapter 3, Natural Features and Open Space, Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Lands chapter (18.775) of the Tigard Development Code by revising references to the updated FEMA Flood Impact Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), effective February 18, 2005, and regulating recreational vehicles located in the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: The 100- year floodplain within the City of Tigard's incorporated boundary. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: All designations within the floodplain. ZONE: All zones within the floodplain. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.775; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 3.2; the Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 5 and 7. 5. CIP UPDATE 6. OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes December 20, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice-President Munro called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Vice-President Munro; Commissioners Anderson, Buehner, Caffall, Haack, Inman, Meads, and Sutton Commissioners Absent: President Padgett Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager; Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner; Gus Duenas, City Engineer; Jerree Gaynor, Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS The next meetings for the Commission are scheduled for January 24th and February 7th 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2004-00003/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2004-00002 PLAN & CODE AMENDMENT INCORPORATING REVISED FEMA REQUIREMENTS REQUEST: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has required the City, as a condition of continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet NFIP standards. Therefore, to meet these standards, the City proposes to amend Chapter 3, Natural Features and Open Space, Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Lands chapter (18.775) of the Tigard Development Code by revising references to the updated FEMA Flood Impact Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), effective February 18, 2005, and regulating recreational vehicles located in the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: The 100- year floodplain within the City of Tigard's incorporated boundary. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: All designations within the floodplain. ZONE: All zones within the floodplain. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.775; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 3.2; the Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 5 and 7. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Gary Pagenstecher presented the staff report on behalf of the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -December 20,2004-Page 1 • • City. He read the relative code criteria into the record. He reported that the scope of the amendment is quite restrictive; it is primarily to make our code consistent with revised flood insurance rate maps and the flood insurance study which has just been published by FEMA. Additional regulations have been added for recreational vehicles used for human habitation (campers, RVs, etc.) that are stored in the 100 year floodplain. They must be on-site for fewer than 180 days and be licensed and road ready or they have to meet certain requirements, including elevation and anchoring requirements, that apply to manufactured homes. Pagenstecher advised that the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) will be revised, effective February 18, 2005 (Exhibit A). The old City of Tigard FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated 1981, was also shown (Exhibit B). Pagenstecher explained that FEMA requires the City, as a condition of eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program, to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet their standards. He noted that all affected property owners received notice of the public hearing. Commissioner Meads asked if the effect of development in the floodplain (e.g., the increase in impervious area and how it could affect the range of the floodplain) was incorporated into the study and the map. Pagenstecher said there is an elevated floodplain level now as opposed to 20 years ago. This may be due to increased development or it may be due to raising the base flood elevations to higher levels. Staff advised that the City code regulates recreational vehicles that are not road ready and have to be secured to the land — they are not allowed as a housing unit in our code. Vice-President Munro asked about recommendations from the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). Staff answered that both FEMA and DLCD staff reviewed the draft language and didn't take issue it. A DLCD staff person did think the definitions could be more explicit. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Coralyn Chaney, 11730 SW Tiedeman, Tigard 97223, asked for clarification about her property classification. She asked if it was zoned A, B, or C. Staff advised that FEMA has changed their classifications. In Tigard, there are A and AE zones. For the AE zones, the base elevations have been determined. For the A zones, they know it's a floodplain but the analysis to determine the base elevation has not been done. Pagenstecher also noted that the map included with the public hearing notice identifies properties that have at least some portion of the property in the floodplain. Regulations for determining insurance rates are different from City or CWS regulations that may apply to properties. These may be more restrictive PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -December 20,2004-Page 2 ® • than what FEMA requires. He noted that development is not prohibited in the floodplains unless defined by FEMA regulations. For example, the City does not allow cut and fill in residential zones. Staff advised that the new FEMA map provides more detailed information. To comply with FEMA requirements and to make people eligible for insurance, the City has to adopt the new FEMA standards. Sue Beilke, 11755 SW 114th Place, Tigard 97223, had some questions for the Commission. She asked if the Commission would be making a recommendation to Council tonight. Staff answered that the Commission would make that decision. She would like more time to go over the map and make corrections. If the Commission decides to make a recommendation tonight, she asked they include a provision for citizens to be able to make corrections to the map. Staff informed her that the map was produced by FEMA, so she would have to go to FEMA to request revisions. Randal Nelson Sr., 11495 SW Hazelwood Loop, Tigard 97223, testified that every time he refinances house, he has to deal with FEMA. He stated that the greenbelt behind his house is in floodplain, but his house is not. He has pictures showing the water level during the 1996 flood. His house is higher than homes in his neighborhood that are not shown as being in the floodplain. He noticed that the new map still catches the corner of his property. The Commission suggested that he have his property surveyed to get accurate elevations. Adam Zwerling, 10325 SW Meadow Street, Tigard 97223, stated that his house has flooded twice since he bought it. The old map shows his property in the floodplain, but the new map shows that it is not in the floodplain. The new floodplain lines are one property away from him. He wonders if he could get FEMA grant money if his house flooded. The Commission suggested having his property surveyed (FEMA floodplain elevation certification) to establish where the floodplain line is actually located. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED It was moved and seconded to send a recommendation for approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2004-00003/Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 2004-00002 Plan & Code Amendment Incorporating Revised FEMA Requirements, including the staff report and the testimony received this evening. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0 with one abstention. Commissioner Caffall abstained. 5. CIP UPDATE City Engineer Gus Duenas gave a PowerPoint presentation update of the current 04/05 Capital Improvement Program projects (see exhibit C). He noted that he would be back to the Commission in February for discussion and input to next year's projects. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -December 20,2004-Page 3 41110 • 6. OTHER BUSINESS The Commission received committee reports: • Tree Board — nothing to report. • Park and Recreation Board—there was discussion at the last meeting about excessive drinking in the parks. • Planned Development Code Review Committee—the committee has drafted language for the purpose of the PD code. • Transportation Financial Strategy Task Force—the task force has been discussing potential revenue sources and is thinking of a local gas tax proposal that would be tied to specific projects. • Downtown Task Force—the task force has held 24 outreach meetings and had a public workshop on December 4th. At their next meeting, they will be looking at the ideas they received. They will be going back to the community in February and are forming subcommittees. 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. J, e- Gaynor, Plan ' g Co /ission Secretary A -Ar T: v ice-President Judy Munro PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -December 20,2004-Page 4 , • 1 ''rr"tSi e49�v�a•O r ttya ,. , 0 ü;ri!'a�. - i VWSNa.9.i li.,.,: &2jb, 22 :."rd„:.�L� t1t' �l :tJ:, to e. attic � -41. ,.im nttJEt1 .-k,•{ 4 . qu a 7{ t ��n d. `°' i f'° •r S '� ^ e'.11 .•.r,. i C�r-1 !T A• ' Li V"! ..L-ti1�IL u'- 'Y �{' =7 , 7 • r•t s' 1 r r�`++�Q !!l .�.- I-� r ,� .,- � �T� Goraphic inormation Syslom r 7 i�ua� ,� .=.1.., 4 'L. C ♦ i� '/.. .,,,r � G'+ � '�\27 � 1 7.-'$T"°.'\� ..1� l.,il ay D q=�' •' • ^w .+ rE u. n . �h1 4 /�Jl` _'I��li ♦ ' n .L.�aa I.(y . �� o q _.,,�.•�M"�--6• �r�c3. ..[,'t,I-r yA.� "•a3, .r1,An•, l'..tt-, / 1.✓_L I 3C,.' .'. 4f ..�, '�C aW 'ICn�O`•.l� ��•+V" ♦ M LNG" V �a • _.�..C 31Y D tC1:mil'F' �T�• . "�r3Z '1 Il••1~' 1� " . II 'I IG''V �'♦r: h 16 i '`�>G G •••C .,V •• w 1al i..tvi`'. r n� aut? .r • �•' r u. I £' ,, • �1/r.gr gyp `�' "tea '.► S�iS`L o n y 9 6J•• i"`t o f L U E .r��s► S' f 1.Tr•-�i C.� ni + ..i7. _ +Itn 'h. ,• r ./ - • ♦ -f' f tTGI,'.,r e B::t c E , ii s 1 u x� _1lrR` t }�t.��� 1.. E ��J y �.rA � J • b•��•��JID.•"V-4� %dE.'r"�r- ri. 4�dN��� 1� �.♦ �/h .- i�f"�\\ �' r L, • .'f ltir"' ilL�'L1 *��r'- 71"" r' City of Tigard 1 .. "� , ,,�; ;: � m `�:: � _ 7 � D. r• ..,. U�0,j.- r„ e . ,j 11 !j ml I.U � F t." l a .\�✓J' I-'- - / - 1 s mow_ • ;y� MA Rood Insurance Rate Map i:•g;�ia r'.19 ` p,,yr- , _- � I �5-1 ■► 1 115, r. r A�,a',g� � ,.,; �.. 'i 100 yr Floodplain in Tigard '' `��� '' = y ���"�° ° G •-r' �- _� 'al �- C t° .4 r I' f. .. 'r y r'1 ..t. i ��- .,f Yr 1 'S r'- • ���•fG•ru ,.i►♦" 'rvue t r• C ♦♦ • t r'-"' T[-4 11�* WO ,41 r ♦4-♦ , La a n i LA'S r•=':: r,..'7, +t -.. -1.. ,r t r1iC l.�v 1�� i�Ji�\. L',F'Ct •- u 'If ((j'1" .�. -r (iJ'-r't.V •`C'11•f th . .:, ._ j wn+ _ am,_WOW. •• O:i en i'"" o r e vu � W' '6 ,� 1Ghytf�?r -.,\r �,! t i C_� � , �[[��!}�j xi"�p� c.. _. .P J- �r1'1! :J II .Sr_ .�'11111•T••1-' \glD�y'+s J .u`'% .I' _■'rZ'1.V r.3,�. �`.Y,►,•r+.>, 4r'i 11:,/1' `• 3:d 1\,. �1 � �' yI'IT•l i-•.'11AIU/\I -1�1\/ r..�..� t.. Ntrr( � , •nr %t,lna"�ncnr u.m aY�;:O R► r fie" :i � .WIZ' d� ���, rtYrrj / =' _ ;pn.lm��l r 3'x.0 •,Ire�,"y�m�____ Era �� `+1 .y,��.�r.r,.,.. r . ' �Nt-�, N---1 -' ' .o.v V ��°i •�• t ,i��,i��•A,a"hr� 1'nn<' -13•' a .•,' ..>\C "-a nn x --r..__. 4-.' G" ,.,:v WW1 s.,•nuA.. • >. 0°.3. ~♦t. ' , Wn r•. +i+",'4,.; ,„• I• I \ Z. ,r• -1 '+ ,161,- *" II' -tl-s4,3� -7 J_au =rn ,. ...AMA; /xrac /r' .y} rq ''S 4 3,�Jev%i:+.6 a► r !ti M• ,\ . • u� 1�( S7 ^_'_� ly. r.�t..i.Tu� r` "O.f1J'i />`r'mzo swao.com.v i 10-�j�,� m..., ..0, '; \ir•4.3,itit l!.vim..,.. ''.Cs ze.s... ;9 i,li `! .0 �::."��� _ \,, �- ,el, r"r,.. li:L El'-�, •r '3 ( a_ ,(�j �•_' , t��`?. .W r rnl�. a rE;'.Cr►1"'M!'. �" °; :r•. ;'y, �. '^ lltti- : o �� rr Jr CL •��r- 4 lIli, e._ 1 ,J% t►t� •ty -1 5 4 _1 `".,:i 4. ;tl -env,'; ....v.__-A----- •• �4' ,•• ,/ s a %v s..,n �y4. ./� I 4 +�. • `_ 'n1 + �"+a . .r ,s (pr:;':. ) ,,.• _ 1 L IC £ ' g.Y,r't . ' FEGAIcor.Flootlq.uIPnernurl r ►q•Z►� �' l�Lueri�Flo, . ge�L r ( .+t.n:� _c+ i. �1 `_- 1- L,-2t,-,-.`y , . :�fp FT C ' 1-•.'1 Fog 1� `_-�¢ -r`i • ( rtia\' n. h ,EC•: m p kikr♦ 7�5' 1 'i+)'I.. M,AI �.-..�•,^-r• 4 d�.' _ m• <^\\ 19 uL�c'11CJ 7_ :..t"`,Y"r7r�*,--.u'e. •0 •- .t 20 1^' IAB1fEMA l0AMF4al.Yh• r rC� a"`\.� 1 ♦S ...f,'=z...= ' •1 ���F- • •sir �r :.�` �L (' u^� I f _ 1 �1•` i rCr 7 ' aw.n 1l�Ir, �" ll - � _. r • i j o st o,.. , • -t,�I,r.. 1 7V� 1.P. {=yrT J „il A ``\-•�._ f, „ a{Q' n' •G� nlunnip. , •A aP v. u. Y. .r: i p.4 .ry �`` T'_.-1_- >" r( _ r E '-6.-_-'1'S •. / rl.141.7,46.-,..ii,,,of •, \,� ;/i' `__ ..,,. O �.°: , n _r i �'�� • `a. 4h�o v,'c: I ? +¢ 11+'r':.i -3_1" _ .,minn4t4 y .,-I��� _1 _ r r �' C'f,;i,�..� 5..� ;^ a� '���`; ._ 1✓�`I _ `�.�I;.•�♦i \ �) {'� •/;'•.- _t ,y h, c111 l -,(If • `E11P1' Pim ; •� :r3..\�. r C.'I�+•t -1 p.-111 i -r n I1 r i1ii1•�'�"'•.�:;' `P, .t' 'e� `'7\' ,L-- ,„..4 / :-4.1.iP!. ...., /may I ,r 17 _._.J .. r. m"'I+ r1,11., ,_.r -a •~i^ I I / j,I C! unnrra tlN,7E11 r •'+r1: �• r, .n.=r \ 1 +•.+• iEiØj / %�� v. _ :! •,'':6 + ,..1'�g�_ .4`:Sh,.:mm o0-%C ``� 1: _ -■ !m 4 " \p 'a Iy - .r ` `"- ` </I(/ r,,. GU' " ' / �. `7 ti"! J�ij , �1` ,.,_ _ 3,'2, .(!-h w �~ai Mg armrnh. "�. iA • rLy / �1 '�r��1 .1. *• .a t"_1~ +-.-1V� I"'/. ti !' ...--,_-,-/-,[� I`- �. F 't� • /f.* r•- -- tY: A �i♦E"�.+1Y,tn l =N, . -F=:✓,• •.�ltl ,t7... .. T. r-(f C ,�' 1 �� CU 6 I�I�„.,.......7r Jam' • irim:L*4 r' Ems'-=? ,. a :w....t _i. i ,.7!tt -=115- .-^ .r,A I-4-1 l� 'i� 6 . -^Et. ti I1 iS-*'T= i ICt'{ .,E"�,.14-- x 7 ••'! a �\ � u".. ' °.?E;"'r" ''`lli� '��vl�o v . _ = 1 �� '1=�'�s 4 1��- /1J-il •t-1 ,�f., xy^+r'':t.1.--�-'°•h✓: ' t •:•",-,t,r..+ •.a '� r A; 1'..-c r �i u ,� 'It�u iy ,r '. I -,-- r ,E-ffla--_�-/ _a^ - ...,:.';a-*Ail, �� \ 7i. ,,,T -'"4114•.14"-� :jr .. ini.""! or `gyp va';y' `C� `�ti• J� I 'f ►' •MM.if • .6-. r \ /',\---- ...••�Y�ir O iV Q 4-'j t-* p �.o w~ •,6 \ 4.',* `.. .r\1•. 1 L ,,.. _�-\ yy.,. �„� 7� i�'` ,,'�+.p•--v. N� %' j. :.P."�y�rt i'u ,�,,,-i r yt �'+J. �« v"TT, • II .\' *y� ` . ',6.\::C... '��N" r `\ ,'-n-. tom._ r_.1.:..-F I 1iL imp C .\ -ti`+<"' j-' ��' - •� -' I •„ n a•�µauu 'dr~ 41 w }Sul ,,,e 'd= _-iNi►+RlK ,_'∎NI .3aht. 5�, -- -ri tt, i�=f�-�' t '.rr��InUS) j .imr�r"+j• °"sn�' J3 I'�w"t �'-1a..Z n, _ vd'6 i .44•:__*ilk cnm / 4,.. '•S' y e�.t�<. ` b''�Iy. `vY• i►. `r \\\\\ \ I�i�'7.._.:.N 4 �•,r fir,n1 6, nun- 1+ C . �-„,.*,-, .,�, -,., y;VIM ,.►♦N l F- \ . �.y.N_i"-_-I G"_'�L'L[ __,, " r+ Rums 7.a r`6•n 11�qt'� mrI1I g Ir 1 . O ' !ragl t5 p fi, J % r`� \\\ a r\ H { ��i.,� tq--=CiLn t-----• ��� � .�'.'t • :•' /•.,°, rrr�"";,' j► r4 _ •. =-CM1'"- •..•.^1..,•'' •?.;y� ' -7.._� \ , - 1. - r,. .+w,�i 1=•m i �..,,,.a,-- I � �.y 'i '<-� 'h.''d° Mr� _� 1•��, �..I„' =!,) Y:�'r,�.t `•Z4;i • yG�e>' � \\U__ I�-,.,�A ,, � �I-. `'�.7..I i\ Q�r \ .� I `� �x,,' t_.�_ �\ 1{-�''r iL_ 1 \_J 1.,.�.T�"=.`r.'Y.! •L...I ._.' I /f .e...�... ..+>i.i+_n.c..�...omu ya. �.'r.,Ei *Orr: ..�.,.� ■ , L�,l ,1i.� <. A �_ r 1�!' .. .,ir`',- rn,y_ .... �,=.::.,t.-_ ��.4� t1 •►. 0 0 -a "- try" min \. Or ,'tm , �---''a.- :,>111--m„�_.-_.i___1.=..1 .-.. TM.��.t. ,: :. ^s, �'' -. I vL,> i r,� _ rd / /! '� 5Y" Ilf .. g .."✓ ,��j r'7. I. ,i.� L'. 'rs' --�L''1fi .\\\ -\ r �_ R- a�r/�i d ! x �I i',, 11 . n� 4• r�x r�i ':.+r w J I.-;` �.4�kf "7•JY "• )"'�f ,._H�\•`\•�,�...._ , A► ■r .' #� .:m t7 h�{ •E:t'- i-Il-rt' • ��'/' .t 7__•- It`}=,.' .c � a �,M�. i,I r'-'"'='' _.T� � �� ■!! � h`1 -tiq!!:e• � r ifi "C` r/ � aii O ': / -ir•_ t��'- �r�( += .li'• ., ,.��. `� .____ _ ',� +1. n :4 a �._. { Iii'---, - 1 E;�V !���� D! r •. ��""k f� -{ �,-'-,��i °`-^C�■�„��� ��r �-r.� ,-[.�i.•°I"^t-F�-'n'.....w. 1.L .��T ' I ::::7:_ v_is .ry`'•°� ,. \`\_�___ ° 4a .-.-_._-_- un$ i• !!�,�, . �p� 4.1, `i-. - rr-.'«.. -!1- ... '.`i/� `•t'`- `( .� a�I ''i.,r+ •''.,' `.. l • "r - :'uur �r11 O O/� '�>r " '� t�' �••7_'_'' I '1--,.,f-E'-f ,-1= ?,'r.d.,r1 "1y.� ', --��� n 1-..; -I'dJQ9_T..._„.. It p �, ♦• • `---_I•' i .�.i.. ❑ It i :,`. ;-IL-..,,�,.H7t--. T,�I �r { „�� ` z;�=,-_C.�._� ;.,. ..y\ ;Li��---_ '-. _1 � v~�aa 'r ♦ � ,m.ta��u� .�� .-._ � �fir•; ,�f;y1F_7= (�- F-' �4.Ic •It�.0 Yt� ,ipp N•r ♦ L!C, 1 j••= "''"L ui"! �i �. " Imo. III..1"' i .,' :��1 tF:y^ ;;1`'�'{>i-_- -1 ;, '� ,' .;-+.^ • I • ti'..uWt1 ,f�.. t1'■ ♦ ..- �° '.4 --i.e. r _ /'r� r- "' .i,• -,�,.L. r-. {r.r... ::,r_.r 1 ', l� I i !j :T,.•` t�' -1 I �CZ.. r t niii p, ■ tai, \ ' f-•C•• ;` j' } ! ar w �� {•• r ~ ----2,----Li L ` 1 1 1 f ^ '� • �' 3 t1 'w41 '�:1_"__ _ ' -' f a.aces•t tim' ♦ � ''-1.-.1 I (. I 04 +(?�,c t N-T r � ,ti r�.L'.-I. .5114,1-P`''�{r ` ly+cyxo1. .='11 .;ajw-, \ ^,_`__i;"f-�, -rte--;. L. �. ai ' t.9° i'+"ti.--..I.--�-7 / f,-- �' ,' „^---.._.a'4'{ a`:^ T ,` 1`{_ �. k+r'+-r]a r: E" - -r"'`c� ,1.-._I ~ �-; �'t�, ` 'f._t.'- �"' „„moo.•'..' �� =sue " -,:' '� �'' e\To_ i I %r.. CL.�".` 7.' f• ! 'k7 v4.[W,�F'`r..v i r,=:.. -I: ...�, • ``'L„ I',i s.:---F--�' - �!IlYCaw.rrr \ ni! ,=-.-JT., %i`�-rrJ-(~•-�,+s y -t;�,,Csi_. .'�.;4-�--- .1 � '1_�,,,�s•�..:+1' � "i-�' -I �'I' _ -�3 .s..,,,,E,.ro-..u..-�.,,.�.rxr �n� R m = ' �' r G..IJ�' '�•:: �L.. :�' -.-i'_' I t-4;0 •+ '.q=ticE7 f �' •I "�: `/ f ''. '_.','I + ." a _ ! "- \. k ,� F[= - c=rt I -';}sue. Z'`-,,9 rJ •: J. I 1 \ •_1-r :.a• .5 � I i -tl Y:n....... e,;,e�s�- =., 7.�.- :(.-JE"..+�t� T'.'^� �q f? '�:;=.c f _ 7 �,''��,�' �t--__:~'--, �� �+1:. "'. ,a�i'\t rq:, ... ,-;i �,: J cE"F3 F-' ti�^�'�, : -': H-- Le: .\ f ... 1 � �>t, ��� p��3 - /.� ''(�J '° c ,. .z �/_I'_'-_�P 2=•."i'' e"F`c�.7_f,�•r�� ',�77...,5�' -�.c�.r�c",-_�""�S',:£ '7 ''(�..,,I.r_, "t�,� i '-"% + '-_.�'.-�, \'� �r.+ 4 \,w.' /' �- Ili ,ry -pl�..wy.+, ll y�„ � �`, _L=�,.,..y_ i•;=. t_:. '- '� � .,�_,•_j5, 1 L �' t o )�"- h /! a.`1 nl Jr." ° N L j r i_'_. �v� I \'�'�`y� r.e. Rx /. '° -,- rt�. °te r t e t: L rr.. F r'r c� a.:. I �: _�• .,•��•' ,�' ' 1 •?-, _ „- "Ef_,`iT...0�,Ci_:;1-- •+' r..g '; 5 7,F,c .1,.t(EL.4. r ~EJ. \'a� 1 i..r"^,. =- i't Li" 1 I _'7r-}' :C �*1 '7LAta. ` r wti 1'�`s+= ..1 4w ,. j tom-..,.,,_ I`e'\ � I-._.._� f� ..cI� -:. i`i '.1:Jr� I '!1'_]'t�-=.Ft74-y�:C• t1_...-' '�.,�q,: ,I�',:I ��� i i _��,I ,.'7 _ • •(i.__________i_. _ 4`-.. v?=1� v; •i'�, 1 '7 _ ..._..-�� �.. r' (>,..,, :I~', i -.J�� `,! i. ..,_,,., - _ ,�••\ \ . .l 1'r ..,,.,..w 'In �+ I !tom` s' CCCCC• �€€6 rEtJtt- �t`sg r� r ,_ Q ,� 4 T *•,:,-ii- 'r�J�ksi.V. ' _^� fir E\ _ "'r1 t +; ^^=I _ .s ,car 1�•-�•.�? •[:, :ft;.,:it��,;:2},,1fyy d .� .» _/ . . -_...,4----<-7,:c...!,----.1----.±-___,-:„,,,�. (65Q , li. '� 1 l.3� rr��•� 4' :r _ 1_t_.ntr- ('ETl' :�,r,'y:' �.��; i�_r.-_r'r.?��i�r-._.--�' „/. •I�.'�- •r' ,;M ,r^"••I a L I I I _714,051,11/1.t' I n E E' E F� i. ra;??: I ,r • '•-.77•111:7' 44^i 14 i �~ Lr "I 1 I rl .�:Y3� `:u'• T I "l J I_ L ' h '1.."r:;r �-, ..J,1-71 .,, - `'I ,.....,.......«..,....,.....,IT • - I "�G {i(�; M i I I4 ' �.r� I", / }??Ci\ri I� \ n� • I rpJ,,. \,. ,�rro.•sn• .<w� a - �~ I I f`r ��i, \ a l /- � �,F�4}jri f�tJ s.�(j Yrl....,JTr�. " / 'w." .` .._.. ,\ s - - ., I� i�< §I Wert\T.l 1 :• -�., ..."^�' I,:' ‘....'.,:l L�\'`C ':� i!: i - �, `� - L,,\o,I.paid Y • • G ,a k ' ,4 k ' �P v'i Tigard ,,, , it'ta '.f FY 2004-05 Capital Y,iA�: Presentation Overview Improvement 2. Program Update X4`4 • Program Areas a • Completed Project Highlights a� ,` • Ongoing Project Highlights F I • Upcoming Projects 041:''ll 7� 1, -- -��� • CIP Formulation Process "° {tit'4erzo,zooa •What's Next? k Program Areas ',; Program Areas • Street System Program • Sanitary Sewer System Program Traffic Studies y 1,$ - Citywide Sewer Extension Program -Traffic Safety-Related Projects °:.''4 - Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance ti - Pavement Major Maintenance - Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements ,g‘.,S. -Traffic Calming Program =,' • Storm Drainage System Program - Major Street Capital Improvements I - Storm Sewer Major Maintenance : Bridge Replacements ',,r-$ - Storm Drainage Capital Improvements Program Areas `''`,:. Completed Project Highlights }Pars': '+,r'i.'If 'd.� • Parks System Program �1 iti -Citywide Parks ' " `'• t- , t: -Trail Systems i+ r Gaarde Street ` , . ', ; Prior to /. �Yk , WI • Water System Program a Construction ;, 4"t,44. aril • City Facilities System Program „t,,5 ten s.,.;. Ede ie,, r i z ',u4 ., Oa 't,4 :h S"'i ;v { xr"1'tic" a 4'+U3 1 — • • • ' : • , '' i - i , ■ . . Completed Project Highlights I Completed Project Highlights ,MililliMINIMMinill 41.1=1111 ,..`.' '•" r,.0, :... • 1 ° r,l,'' ''' '': If4c•• ,,,' ,iN'Ye: ;4'41- t, Gaarde Street •.` ' ,,,It•54" ', '' ,'4 Gaarde Street ,. d„,,,;',■, •. ,-,_ P. ,• Completed '•• ii ,, -t. During 'I''' '•"-I I -,,_..-1,....„ ",•:, , ..,,.; `^, - j Reconstruction ,-.,i:, .' --,5„.,,. :,--,\. ..Ank. ''''t;■ - ,,,.., • ,,,,,,', -.-- ,-, -Elf•.::',-;41 t:-?:-..."`'''—'- " " 1,'..••.:'' „ ' ',i t,i: ':,i,‘ -' • '' , ,,624,41, '• W,..'"--.•,?■•'-- 1:' , .•..• ,-,r-•-:.7.,-.'":,,,,), 11 Completed Project Highlights Completed Project Highlights 4111111111111110/11=1111111111111111•11111111111111111 41111•111111M•111151•111111•1111MINKINIBI Gaarde Street --a- .. „ 1,..,, Goat do Street '....;,.. -,'■•• •,,,,, ' .4; !„,.,..—gAt,,.. cOMpieleCi "''.4. ".• ''' C 111)icted -' •'''%it '. ', 7:7:A. . .. r'. ,..+.4 •- ?• .:.e,,f•L..!4:•■•••■A ° I iiii Il; . ii xth;V;:, ., .', ..t : . Siiinal System @' -1''if• 4 ..,,•, Iz `-','1•794 '''.• I' - U, ., ,•„. 121 Avenue -'7* ii. i4 1•'4."-',',..,4 :•• ,, .„ Inteisection _ •• „ Fi'lit'r,•,,, ''':''''II,',„,":44„, -24;;'14- - . ',,,,---'9 --:";;I:", I''''',1,..,:-." --4,.4 4, ...... , ........ :.,....3,,,,'_,..,....._.-....- 10 . ,,,,,,,•-• Completed Project Highlights Completed Project Highlights 411111.11111111111111.11111111111111111.111111111111111111.i,p',,,-_ __ 11%1 411111•11■MIIIIIIIIIM1111111111111111111111 Gaarde Stieet 121''A\Tillie • ' -.4!;:0'41'' 'tig ' .- 0 COMpl C IC(.1 ' Improvements as -• .,,' . Ot \.„ . icw li•om 121'' ' °''',1.1 , • , "ro Ovirde Street -- - , •.v. , , ',,,, Avenue ,•;-,,,,,,,P:;,/,,i,f1, W-T,,,1 '‘'40', 1 •?"'", •P', , ^..'"-..Y'''''`--4-'';'74 r-' ' L''''.-"--7" wfr'''7..',.',/, A,. 3 4 4, :-41.1." '`'01;Y:$ Project iiieez: !,'.i,-i7 . :, .,:,.0..'•,,,,li 4VA,',-0', '4 i., .. ' 'If t'',41;''' 4.4!":,* `..'' '.1 • : ' 44-',176*tttVNI,Aft. a , „a • 11 . 12 2 • • rl' �J,<1 1;� Street Maintenance Fee - ' Street Maintenance Fee ;( • Recommended by a citizen task force • Ordinance adopted November 18,2003 '';°! • Fee is tied to the City's 5-year corrective and `::;a-'` • Resolution to establish rates set "r,rq; preventative street maintenance plan February 2004 .::r,,1 • Allocates the costs among the residential and :7k • Implemented—April 2004 1 non-residential users aG',r • Funds are being used for corrective and ;t, • Addresses the$4 million maintenance ''>'''._' backlog `_';-: preventative maintenance on City ; t;. ° • Provides a stable source of revenue for .: streets street maintenance Completed Project Highlights Completed Project Highlights `i 66.Avenue "' • pYn m SlreetIM91(ltenariliy,ff o f ry'r�i s it'S^'•:�;'. - .el:u'dad Pr6Jeect'`lieff 1;',frli .. ' ;, �trs,t. T aN i.�..k'z .Y•,1x�i..- i' ,'. w:: t.. ' t&ik«a,..blcir'::;...�:Sid I k• '{�}':i,. '^"11 ., a i .Y I �`7J+=*v fi . }r �ZY{�. w:4 �<N.:rtri`ih ,.nr : x`,'x{ :. 'as�t..tsva.a._"`.6`,t�e'ra:z. 'or.- ...ed»—�' r T.' k yip a'�', if{"�� t c tit,. ":+. ,4. .n a, " 2au'��i ' 72^^Avenue(Spruce to Oak) sitA,�y .40/..,A...cccc •i lre.; �r7r { 67.Avenue V.; .... ..?.�� ,,:.. n -::., --t��. i7, *? , '..0"..4,',-.y. ,.crt T,.N,ac d .- 15;! 16 Completed Project Highlights •! Completed Project Highlights ;Y • .fir l , \fi 4` ,l e•,‘,-•!,.1.,...,.,,,,,,,,,,,,t� , _ F� 7 n ,.7 ,11.c r+ rr„ '7. r,, r '7 { t .'.:. 't,:Sty. ' OP° r .t_: , „...,,,_:,:.,,,.„.„,„.„.„,..:".,....;„, .. ...,,,,,,,„...,,,.....„„' 'j ;; f 1 � t ,;(ri �i�' L .t iJ,0:7;t J ,li,',. Y i' t4 ” ,„ . �thet !925lir''I!apa•4ti4}S,i a st )Ji;; Derry Dell Court Park Street j, c r i ,1Z 11 .18 t ': 4i u2ad 3 . • ' i Completed Project Highlights ;-.I Completed Project Highlights r" ' •? '�x °� Y During construction r �.j d 4 ., f'" •� �$r yr; i!". w .tr lj`FS ;p,l� `.�a'; a ''t,.4`'jL Td:fi�'" i.+5 ' ''''C.:..2.1'.„,..,• r • ,k 4 . 0, +.whl .awr.T L: +l r CSC. �. t Tk't .ar r.„ "1%:.n .x S t iiChInte nCe Peer{t a z ' y,, xESE ,`.•. a ' ., !� •y i}try r 5' f'S in fnen j '..'"1". .. ,iFuilded'Pfojedr..,:5 ..'A Ti r� Ine Y�isnl� $l I u.:.Maple Leaf Street {v1.,r ''^+N,p,,"r• e.'l, +§1 i 5 $ ,r1 a z ,, r y.4— :„,,,4 tkx,,':Kte:', ti 41107-= Maple Leaf Street �g ,2p'' Tigard New Library Tigard New Library .41,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111=1/1111111111111E1111 11111•1111•11111MMIIIIINIMIIIIIIMMIIIMI • Over 48,000 square feet • Designed by SRG Partnership • Funded by a$13 million bond issue • Constructed by Hoffman Construction approved by Tigard voters in 2002 Company of Oregon • Includes donations from Grace Tigard • Completed in July 2004 Houghton and Neva Root • Library opened early August 2004 • Constructed on time and within the budget • Grand Opening on August 22, 2004 21, 22 • Library Project Library Project i`,i 'a "' . Library overview Grading work 1 * ; August 30,2003 q f . i7i * r ongoing •23•• 4 L.fir+_. * 0 .1 Library Project A."1,,:-1 Library Project , 1 . ., ,4111111M1=11111•111111111111111111111111111111111M ;41111=11111111•11111111•111111111 ;•-,,,,,1 ,',,-,•::,,,-1 ---'7-' --.' -' -1 Library Parking .2!'.i,`'''41 II;■P'4-2-":71.•.W.—15:LF.' ..:/zd'il" Lot Paved ,c,,1 NI • ,..,tr......k-,,.. ',.:••1 ' ', ■• ,. ' t. t . October 3,2003 1 •,P.'f - 1,--- ---- r-- 1....),-" 4 , --.. .1'1 ..--...,4-,...asx—.144,-t---- -2...,„ t.,..., y,,, 4 ,. „r. ev,,, •,14, ' v.64,19 At. t o-f,c ,,74.4,--,,...„, , .., 1.'.'.-13735.1-45,404,2 Structural Steel Being Erected October 3,2003 • ;,251 26 ■ . . New Library Completed New Library Completed 411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111 411111•1111111111111 3F -5,'..t.;;;--2,n', 1'7't,z-st-'',.:'-i.:,%?,,,,,'-:, '''''''_-.,1',.;,--•...z.,-.,.. .-;„,,,,- - , -.,.. , i t'' ._ -•t--k 41.,,,k,. ,. .•„ i. , 14..e,r,,,,I -.- ti ,la...^4:1-.--••",- 1 ' 17..----1,-- •• ".;,.•.'."...ri til-71., , - ..--- . ! '''W. - , 0-, .__,-,.. fr,, ;;;42, ---.• ;',,,fiqz,ocit,?:,?,:x.. ',A:„--,:. .-. ---s- _ t-• 27 ../-.. ,'t 4'4''-- ss,,sst ess.'..ii-,' assx — 28 1 New Library Grand Opening ' New Library Grand Opening ' 1 111111111=111111■111=111111111111111111111•1111111 '4' - III'' ', •-q k --,F ' -,,,,..i , ,,,. , , - , ,,, ', . . ....- , _ ),, , ,. ts ,'‘ . , + • 7'.,."1- •7.' i ,t „4 ! 3 -0•'•'.," '— 1' •,..-•. .-' 4.-4- , -. . '41 - 1 ottl 1, *- — A h■ . ..,..f , I .4411.Z‘livl,r., t '' " A71., 7-4, ....4111.; ;i „..p.:.,,,.,i. ,‘.., '-',.. - tv. i , ' , `'.1' P." ■- ! 11' ■ ■ . III') ; p,,,, • :-,P-. i ,■•• .1,, t , ' •' 4• ., 11.11 ' ' .' : `.*;,,` .•.' A 4/4 . , ,A , , , ,_Allw-,-, '""•""' ;:7 ,.1,- '..'N .* 1 Curtis Tigard Speaking ts- 1—.7: Nis•'''., ! 4 .,.I. -- • at the Grand Opening 29 1 30 . 5 ■IIIIIIIIIII11111111111111•I • • .' , ',„•;••1„ ,.1:,,;',."..,"'.. .,'1 (1.1',.',..",.'.':',,.". .,.4i.".•',..4.•;',.i,1 .,,,',..,•,.' ".....1.........,..-,&,......,....i '..:,?', :''•::,'f':•,-:•:'r'!,'...,,,l'''•_::,i111 ,.'-•• - Hall Boulevard Improvements :',,j..4, Hall Boulevard Improvements tealIMIMI=IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIIIIIIIIMill j • — ., .,, • , rrmr-,-,,--, ',7'""■71 ,,f`r.V4 .-,.. .. ■• ;' . H:P;''d 'r,,5,1,,..,P,4.,;N i k ,?t.',ti' ' '-‘•'.1'.'. 1 ;4' pi c;,...,..:. Hall Boulevard cI 0.-. .,. ...- :,,, ._ 1 4.:V? ,. ...Ye « 3: -- Underway ' . V,—1,,:„.4,N •.,4111,0'-' .. V;4, '- 1,14" " 44 . `- V„.- -:-.1'..' ....''' '- "l..T.W.V.k.P.11.014—P''''',f..:•i''' ''-‘2."''1-4; 'VP' '" :-,.,..!' '':','. '''' ' .'..,.",,M8'.14"P'-0 - '..,-;-',t, ',i':.w.y.44,:?,,,Ii.1:,•.tot.,1,.:,:::-..-...-.:'-! , - T7-,‘..,1 ,,,,,,,.„ '14; .1.0...t..,IL■giLt.'4.-''-'" . i4f(7,1 r32'. ' .. . . . ( Hall Boulevard Improvements Hall Boulevard Completed ••:, Iii11111111/111111111111111111111111111 111111111E1111111111111,1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 , , ' :.- -1 '• ''• ' ' :-.11144.'",:,!. v ,-. J. , ' 55,S1 i .,;•.,Lr 1 .r.'..1'I-,• y'5 --;'' '• ‘. • - . ■ ', ',./. -...,..t.ieei -, ,-k.,,. 14.4., .s-t.,..r.‘4',..:,"..,',,..'• . • ,- t'Idg''..,'-•-•,,11,,,4,-.....,,.. ....., ' . 4-`'. ...' ',:i;'1i.:::,z---46. '...,'.1.. ., . ,4, ,, „ • „41.,I -`","'•,t,,,,IrrilrAkr,rry-,•.;4'. -.' r '''• ; 4-#:::-:' P§% d - - '1,-. • , • Hall Boulevard 34 , • Hall Boulevard Completed , , Hall Boulevard Completed •ammommialimmilimmons 11.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111INNIM 4141''', •:' I . ","tt i 44'..i'''i.%).•;'' , ' ,r, °•. ' .•-• '••-• -..•'. 0,6'7' l'.."41R1 4, 1,,,...; , 0 ..' ,,^,t,'..-6,1,: . • .■,, r,''r ; .. ..Q..-,,,---,- 'ii1.4.14t.•.....•.14;lijAthej, .'.,,,, 1..,. ;'.• .,17..' i . _ ,. , ...-,,,,- .., -.,..-o-,„ ', •'4i.,.. ,:'' 0,1%. ... - , ':;=, 1 ,.:-.;..• '.%. . ..:iligit;57%.I. .;''.-•,.-.,' ' —4;;•!.,':',',4.1., 1.-"A•-.' •., . ;-,,,,,i .'s...':',`,.$,,,,,+,''''' :•:54'' :._...,eff,,,*-. - ..,----..--;,_ ;.,., . ,-4,':., n4.0,,,,,,,,,:syk,,,,,.' ,..: :.,4v.,‘,. . ,.2. r$ : - , .,f,',•xv,-...F.1!;,',.1..;,it2tri m.i.....".t.':1T..trer.:.t. c-•,,',.,, -. ,' , '' .' ..,,,e,/. , ,• •• "•••,'.,,,Aii,,-6'''.4'.',tgrki,'".:47.1'6.":44t..- ,',"-,'.'1 A14.•41t,,.'Pll* 1:',.'Lltlik'_,,:ji••-,,-,?,•''.,'„'„:',.,.';'''''''t'''''',' .,.,,‘;‘,',1 ,,..4 L.r„,,,,..7,','4,13%--,.,"'zt,:;1",',..J,,, F;;I:;,=:'-r.:'''' .,..'...v.!.,1.5.,',I,,,,,.:;.;•y,'''.. ..-..,, .! Hall Boulevard . .• :• u. .,:', 0.,.,. '• ".'''' . Hall Boulevard .."'' , ,,,,..;,,.y...,,51-"4- .5,e40;",1I,,','','.'l.•)"';,6:: '*41. 11.4;Lriiiih.&:irLe '' . 35 36: ,1 6 . . • 0 0 '.,:,„,:.,,•.,,,..,.:,':., ',' : '',)ItM A ,,,::.::::::::., ;';,:', :,'„,‘. '''i 1 +';,...■;,q Proposed Wall Street Wall Street Status 4111111111110111■1111111 • Environment permit applications submitted !;;;;;:‘;••.;i —.........._ - \X ,• ';7;7''i;f • Railroad crossing application has been • ,,,•,,,,,,,-,;1 submitted • 425 feet of Wall would be built to , rj provide joint access for the library and Nir•:I,' ;;:. . ,-, ,.t:::1 Fanno Pointe \\: , .VA,`.1,1 • Remainder would be built if LID is 4:;;;;•••,,,:l formed Completed Projects ; Completed Projects Bonita Park Bonita Park II ,,1111111111111111111111111111111•1111111111111•11111111M11 '4111M1111111111111111111111111111111101111■INI :.-_.•!' ir, r ,.$,,Ithr.•,,--;1;•• .r. : 11 :-.• 03,, . <:', i ;•,.4)•,,. •, ' "".,,.'-„ 3,",..,-,•:,,,,4 i-••": •,•'''O'''•1' ''',.-''' qc,rces, ..,0.., "rt.' v;t14,i0.ift/hatti-,a,t4t.;,.,,srt`re ettr, --‘111, -- 7;1 6 r,t,,,WrannO,Pktl, ,,-,. ,....:kii,",,,,,,,,--- • ",•,. -— ?7`-'14::? `,7,1'.1W:-.-7. ;nr,,s,--, .4';".••-.--:Pp:.,,,:. - -.., .^- , .V.I!j1f.1!!!, -.- ' 'il,A.'s.,,.. '144.....:''''.7:•:" .:.,.,. .' '- g g' ; ',■,i OVerall Plan 13e fore Construction 39;. 40 . „ Completed Completed Projects Projects Bonita Park Bonita Park ' :61111111111•111111111111111111111111010111111111111111 , ''' , 4',.;.,- -...,. ;;"4...-!...i,F,-",•r"..-'.- j..,-.,.1 -.'. ' i:r ."• , ,' .• ".■ During Construction . :,•,1 ',''',V,ItF,4`'''`',401:4*,:f., ''':''':`,:.'-,,,:1.,',:-.Til Construction . : „t,-,,.:.-/' t uLiat-:,,:: c ,,,,,t,1 , :,,,.!1 i'M:ir;,--t;'-'1$7;!t!!!1:4,;','`,!ti'' rt''-''! ''!•,'2,.%4 ..: ..: --,,„.:„:,,,.,,, •?.• 1,70.---,- -. ,:0;:,,. .F.. , ,;-,-,.,:os:.:.,.,,,,. trtg,,, ,,,,,,,,i;p:Arr,-..ilr-tv:tti:.,,t,i1x7A ,',. Pr ,:1;f14132F.MAV.,,T,'i '',;.V„i:i-1,Y'.44-.L. Jilf p •••■..0,-i i4 , -- '. ,i'is.;4; ■I 7 '',.' g,,,,,,i-alginliiPit'z'FIYft4:41.,r,,y.13,' " ,'%.9-.),",=,•;,,A;i:,,..,_ ■„,'A f i*,:1-'(; !?.1:?St11"11V;s4 ..:,,,.;;I:i'D r.:. ,,4,t.,‘ii 4',1 krg.,,-,4.:Atkdid,a..Y.A.:-t4Alger'&6',..:lir_ •-" - -,.: .1%;!.,...','I F444.W. r-', .-.'4r,r2FAtfe.,C.',ki;ki,"'"1":', ,1 ,•:*....i..4.!':;‘, 4,',,,,e-Yr.': . . :,.4,..,1.. ..`Ari.'''',,4k,',Iet'Lk!‘!.j-i,V r,'4 '=..1.4 r•-4.t , t 4 e. ■• 10,. ,t,s+,4,!.. 'V.' ' ' 't§etv•A'■, '4.ms,,,,,..: '''' vak;A:- -1-r,,,,i .''.•...,,v , '!,,■ imA;e4trch,41,-, ",.i *teiti:,4?,,,2 411x.:1 , 411. -.1;1; ■'!":4''i ...■IVX.: , ,4,!.:.:.. ■:...;-. t....1, :'•-•,..1 af_-• 1 1/7! 6S1:iitatA14,11:!V.f11.:.•`1!..;FrtkET-:'''''*., 41',1 :42 7 r • A?:, Completed Projects .''' Completed Projects At:: Bonita Park .., Bonita Park Ittp ,, •y�� �/F .rpn _ f llc I '� .•[[yi. 'y�,..: 2,/v' i.,, 13ONRA �':' •..:..■ *1'411? tM1t ; 11f .,a "��' . `"-^`...,,. tf t Yy R '175 't • ,. N r t'3a 0+im r't ER! ' t Dedication Ceremony After Construction ,`, % Vtti 1,Dedication.Cerem'b4y. '1 '.•,;'' Completed Projects : ; Completed Projects Hall Boulevard Sidewalk Project Hall Boulevard Sidewalk Project ,',I1 41111111/111111111111111111111•11111111111111111111111111111111 North of Highway 99W j t y rt rr;; ;,,k''%, t ' k;� !::: ;`,�"` 4t5';::::-f •:4' 'tst at, pp s ^ rX `".:. , 5 is { ''�� 9, .,..,;_,V,.w::}a( kgaa /u" ,. ,.+. , + Community Development Block Grant Funding with Gas Tax �t ' North of Highway 99W '4 :1 46'.! Completed Projects ':rI Completed Projects ,-- Sewer District No.28 (O'Mara-McDonald) :., Sewer District No. 28(O'Mara-McDonald) i,. • Rq .- t ` +h' k tt ;r t<"r J 9 Dunng.` }.4 P n ; e ` J C t f "}, t 9 Construction uction r:;r: i . x lt.r .' . ,itdl :a. J q r':.ztiy y E `.' ,• "7X13 gill ..t t'� r /. ` +Y - PP--JJ a a a� �4 ; '" S rt gg .- .,fir»-M• '.2 1 1' M ;i✓ n 'h 3 yr 1 5 1 ,n y;;r},,>.`f_n+ ..,."2,s.1..'' .:,t?..?a.:e;_ a I ....1.:.fls^�S.!t.PI.,.. � /..'•<....: r 1 r� t.t '�~ �� � r t 1 ! ( n, ,t .',�rf`r, During Construction t'' 1' ,;.r,„ ,ea rh 8 . . 0 .,'-,'i:'+;,:,. .=';',C', ,..' ,,' 7,:,,,g;.•.'s;•::,:„,,..',,l','','-;t614:1,q,,,d . Completed Projects vi4.7'.. Completed Projects • 4,0 t6....:,4 '''..*A Sewer District No.29(Park,Derry Dell) '','-,5i Sewer District No.29(Park,Derry Dell) • *llil ,,r.,4,'-: ' •.„ '4.•:: •,-: C,. • -... .-..; ,,,,,.. 4".", ‘-'‘ sr-7,.'''. ''.- ''''' ,, A A•41,-,.... -, ,. :,..•,,, ;,• ,•• ,- ' ,ti,,;,•„:'=".,r, .., • 4,-, i t44,,!t:".;., :', -E, ''‘52.1 ',... A'4..-::.-': A 3j,:4'2i'• .",i—.P.,-41,1.1t,- -,.. '. :kt,,-;.t.,'..''!? , -.'",,,-.. .,,I•,,..1.„,,/, 4 ,ki,t:n6 -,- ' ' -- ..;,- ' '/,, A '''' '4tN• - • . - - r ,. ,1.$.11,1, Ti., -- . •',--•• t, .alti. ..si.14. :::f,,e3; -iliiii,i.'' : 't,:, r'i`, .. -.:.- -''', ' ':; '... 0„;,t;I:LZ;;;:bP.,-,4 ,1411;„' V.. ;kq, -:.,;'`er.i.mix..tig,y, , *e;--.!•,,,F, :r• ' '"•• ' - .:*;,!., , vi,..1 . :lc . l'''' k':".'i'llif''''''''' 4 rt .'''2'.!MO.I,,‘5,lq)--,,:,,.;,% , 0,,,,,,.,. .,,. .r„ :,,:::::.. , : —-,,,,,t,,,,6 .,,,:foi4,,,;,:,. .....: .,--, , : rfi...,A\.,,e,..,4'.-.',2$2.141"a4; ,,,i,.,.`':t, "...:-,41 wil;,A..„.2.,a•:•• .t'.,,I...'3— , „,,t1i,,,•:-,x2;.Ai ,,,'•.••.• f'-, After pavement oveday * ■:•%.,,44,'Ff1)-., f'...?1,ff?';5'ki,7;1 '',.. During Construction funded through the Street Ounng Construction Sgit,t, ' ,^. ilrp ,,. Maintenance Fee 1%;, . . Ongoing Projects Ongoing Projects Sewer District No. 27(100th and Murdock) ' Sewer District No. 27 (100th and Murdock) eilliniliMilliiiii ',SilliiigiiiiiiiniMiiiiii■ , . . . . , . . • ,. o'',,':i • . ' itt- ,-, .1, •- ',,' :;-,---.-r•"-. 'il.l:;:l'*.+1`..-0-.4.,...„„- .., .• ,,.. , ,,,,,,l, L l' 6 u- • • '' ,' ,:' :, :,it,,,:,'', ''',...,llir:','-0:4■-....L... .„,„„ ,- ;It. ,..1,,,,,,- ;-,'''''l42-:, .l,.1 .,,..;,:, ,. " ` '''.- ;"t ••,, ■,1:f,-fr"11,4 ,I,. „:,,, ,,•-„ ,','. :;;;,,,,-,,,;.•r.,,,k4,,‘,..7,11g. : - . . ,••...,,,,Akt• '''''''"*.V. - 4,I,-,-; ■ -,;:'',,- 0. ';t ,^ Jr.r4^ 11,2:''■.'.2, '''ArAttg- ri l`!*., '1,■I':','I'V'q'.* L,'.1..sc:2....-`::;:)..xj.423F 74 Services-Completion December 2004 • 74 Services-Completion December 2004 5f 52 i ‘ ■ , . „ . ,. , Ongoing Projects L''''! Ongoing Projects Sewer District No. 30(121st Avenue) '' ', Sewer District No. 30 (121st Avenue) .. ! 11.11.11.1101.011. :'4.1.MMilliiiMiNENNI■ONON „. „•i , t, .• i. ,,„i • -. 1 " . ;.-,V,;,.,.:' 4:.,, ., , • ...'";, 4"' :,. . ' ..,,;" ,.,4'!...' „. • . ,. . ;'',(-.':5,1 — '. ....,,, . . . . 1 • ,,, ' ,,,;,,q,,:,, iir';, ... ,-.lt- ,, to ,,,,,l"tt'' ',,4,,,,It,.41,01tol-1,INtvl.r",* p,'■ ,,, l44,',..t, „,.,10.4, x , + :•.,' ' '',. ', '',, l?,,,z, 4, ' -ll' 't' l ' 1-f-l`'flrriz.$14,Pai l',,';,', ,'''':,,,q,r6, lt.';,.1 c,,,, ,-,%,,,l,itt,,tv`l-,,,,l'.pc,to. , il,:sv,,',,-,t, ;; / , ,it,,l,;,/14,,l'4,(k)?.,‘,NA. ;F.).h.).,',./ 'ii e'l ','Ni,‘7 :-. l'1,. 'l'X ril',‘„, I'l" " t ' '''4--, 'll,;‘'t , A...A-aalr.,,Ifiltit:,,iilLtaa,-. . :., ie 67 Services-Completion December 2004 67 Services-Completion by December 2004 Sall 64',.1 9 ..t , • • rITRWMArca v '2 q.0•�t 't? i ,,r ;".uA1?;qtr d. d fe4''4; Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan t ;f" w Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan .! , • Improvement Study currently in-progress t _ i Y�'11. • ,` 'asap , fist, • Funded through a TGM(Transportation&Growth 5 .z !Y Yj v Management)grant ' l y } ,, �,it • Goals are to: IN T,':,' (r. ` , .i' ,' ' , - Provide a physical and cultural core In the downtown "1, fr . - - Stimulate private investment I I ' q q • Parametrix contracted to perform the study „,„ y to • Citizen input is a major part of the process f ” I " > r i, Downtown Task Force spearheading y,�= : • Expected to be completed by June 2005 ;0' ,, ) �} and guiding the plan preparation ppf�ral`gt r h^i'1N3."4f of. +k3 l> Upcoming Projects „E„.,,,,,,1'i. Upcoming Projects 5411111111 '111111111111111111111111111 Greenburg Road Improvements ': :. n; " '° G ': ?>'' Y ,' - Federally funded MTIP project 4', r�t., ,,,,, ft'' , I,I Widening of Greenburg Road ''''' ,1 w�, ' e �'Yx4, (Washington Square Drive to Tiedeman -' ",t'.. ;..,r ' ° i== ',,p,4 Avenue}to 5 lanes t ....4. �'` • Project Status J.t' ; ' R ,a.... 1,:'''',"' - Design by consultant(David Evans& fir" Associates) °'r Greenburg Road { �r `, Improvements , ter ., :-.∎.. 4--. ,G f�F, "sj :Fb ,,;,',:;;""';t• +3, Upcoming Projects r4'kj� Upcoming Projects i,'t • 3 MG Reservoir Project 1",..,,:j i It:is I," - 550-foot Elevation '‘'.,=,ti `` 3 MG ', ,"4'R, 4 �� rI--n_ ' Reservoir y -Adjacent to Alberta Rider Elementary t 1 'I'�`+, Project on fy School " wz, Lr I::�' Bull $,y�' - Siting still under discussion ,r,. ;y:', it.:-,_;.,,;‘,,t!,..1 i I '• Mountain �, � :r i �,.� i,, 4- ':;: Expected to be completed in the next .‘",`,, ,i,j ,/r— u' ..; �;;}'l. t "" _ 'AJ year or two {} %% r ' ,,. 0.„12,,,,i q d; i.1 (pd.. t, i; 0 r _...., 10 r . va . • • Upcoming Projects Upcoming Projects Pcty x t ,Fy �• ,/ Widening of '! t�,%°®'ss4a v," Widening of•',Y , McDonald c pry, Y Qo • f McDonald d ;id Street to e , - Street© ' ' ' o add a right- `+'' ti," t f J' ''' Hwy 99W to ' � u .t sr , turn lane `, Y r, add a right- ^:/;:1/43, � r x turn lane R r 1 - , l.fir ( {� k 'Ai7. 4', 0, ;'r;" F 711 "; y' : 1 '` Upcoming Projects :', Upcoming Projects fit,t ^. 1' Widening of `i ,a',; , Widening of x,g. i n Hall at ,y i i tKi`,-,y .. Hall ,j; 1 ' •• s McDonald to ,l'...., _r;} •, 7 �a'?, r¢I McDonald ,;;,,u - t ,. add a right- x,- W' c ��'* 1 � qtr'v r` Street ;,.,II 0)/ s v turn lane ,!...:":.• . F• et p t ' ;,,.;„14.•17,',•'''•'-1',•.' c �s,,,,,,'k'�'., '„?:J,.•:1 `�:1'c4' `.111.iG..':u' el....? Projects in FY 2004-05 "s?.«;1 Projects Planned for FY 2005-06 ,,'7, , -, Sewer Project Lots Status ;,;^;a;;1 Sewer Project Lots Status O '+', 100th Avenue 21 Planned 'Mara/Edgewood 45 In design v.'',', Cherry Street 25 Planned / 121St Avenue 67 In construction li,`',';1 97 th Ave/100th Ave 21 Planned f.141 100th,Murdock,Settler 74 In construction i.,%;;. Hillview Street 6 Planned Yethli" •'d''!'V 112th/Walnut 34 Planned 117th Avenue 3 Planned 16',v;- Fern Street 7 Planned i Y.ae. r,,.}' Il Walnut—Phase 3 3 In design Ash Avenue 11 Planned P'k Subtotal 195 tit,_� 93'd Avenue 33 Planned Subtotal 158 11 • . Sri • • o i 'P<MV ` k I r k . t .rr , �w l'' 1�Upcoming Projects �t Upcoming Projects f Commuter Rail Commuter Rail s jf .r.eN ✓' Formulation Process ;f:, Formulation Process Review (l',4'1 • CIP Overview-Focus on Tigard _?.:,;i r (November 4,2004) r•.u • Citizen involvement process more t`+'?` extensive than in previous years • Citywide meeting(early January 2005) : ,f•, p y l''2 ' • Planning Commission(early February .,,1 • Expanded opportunity provided for • k4A, , 2005) t,, - More citizen and business input - - Planning Commission review and comment • City Council(mid-February 2005) i's" k'3, ',,--,t `' - City Council review and comment ' • Finalize Project List(March-May 2005) .N ;, '<�'r ;a.r,', r ;44r • Presentations in May and June 2005 ,.ts't- 69t• '44. �,�((y}fi�'tt A vv P`i' rY;;} What's Next? f•:''` What's Next? ;` w ro 0414" • Citywide CIP Meeting }� { • CIP Project List Finalized(March 2005) -January 2005 ,,,'',. • Review and Approval b kk��,' pk�;•�;� Pp by 0 - Public participation and input encouraged F;;"'AL ;q e;,' - Planning Commission(May 2005) � • Planning Commission discussion and Budget Committee(May 2005) st. f' input-February 7,2005 .r„ 2, 46+f' - City Council(June 2005) A.24 i;1";". � ;Y' ••City Council discussion and input—mid- i.af; • Program effective July 1,2005 -x'" �. February 2005,or March 2005 4,,,,,,,,,•'4 n.:io:r el�xg 12 CITY OF TIGARD '"I"IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL HEARING DATE: STARTING TIME: COMMISSIONERS: MARK PADGETT (PRESIDENT) MARTY ANDERSON GRETCHEN BUEHNER ✓ REX CAFFALL BILL HAACK JODIE INMAN KATHY MEADS JUDY MUNRO (VICE-PRESIDENT) SCOT SUTTON STAFF PRESENT: V DICK BEWERSDORFF JIM HENDRYX MORGAN TRACY BARBARA SHIELDS MATT SCHEIDEGGER JULIA HAJDUK 'V GARY PAGENSTECHER DUANE ROBERTS KIM MCMILLAN BETH ST. AMAND GUS DUENAS • °ac`s , flp C 0 7 2000 • ; COMMUNITY • W NaysP�EKs CITY OF TIGARD 1325 SW Casts Drl a,Penland,08 97219•PO Box 370•haverl0,OR 87075 44:, , OREGON Phone:503.084.0390 Fax:503.020.3433 Wit leglailvertishig@tmotinatimiers.com The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday December 20. 2004 at 7;00 PM at the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Tigard Civic Center — Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS Public oral or written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of procedure adopted by I,Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, the Council and available at the City Hall or the rules of procedure set depose and say that I am the Accounting forth in Section 18.390.060.E. The Planning Commission's review is Manager of the Tigard/Tualatin Times, a for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council on published the request. The Council will then hold a public hearing on the newspaper of general circulation, p request prior to making a decision. at Beaverton, in the aforesaid county and Further information may be obtained from the City of Tigard state, as defined by ORS 193.010 and Planning Division(Staff contact:Gary Pagenstecher)at 13125 SW 193.020, that Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: City of Tigard Public Hearing Item COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)2004-00003/ ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ZOA)2004-00002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) PLAN&CODE AMENDMENT INCORPORATING REVISED 2004-00003/Zone Ordinance Amendment FEMA REQUIREMENTS (ZOA) 2004-00002 REQUEST: The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) . Plan &Code Amendment Incorporating has required the City, as a condition of continued eligibility in the Revised FEMA Requirements National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt floodplain CNI TT10503 management regulations that meet NFIP standards. Therefore, to meet these standards,the City proposes to amend Chapter 3,Natural a copy of which is hereto annexed,was Features and Open Space,Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Lands chapter (18.775) of the Tigard Development published in the entire issue of said Code by revising references to the updated FEMA Flood Impact , newspaper for Study (FIS) and Floor Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), effective February 18,2005,and regulating recreational vehicles located in the 1 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: The 100-year floodplain within the City of Tigard's incorporated boundary. COMPREHENSIVE successive and consecutive weeks in the PLAN DESIGNATION: All designations wihtin the floodplain. ZONE: All zones within the floodplain. APPLICABLE REVIEW following issues CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.775; Comprehensive Plab Policies 1.1.1,2.1.1,2.1..2 November 25, 2004 and 3.2;the Metro 2040 Plan;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,5 and 7. 0 .0* 0 f I TT 10503 Publish November 25,2004 Charlotte Allsop (Accounting anager) . Subscribed and sworn to before me this Novemb 25, 2004 ,... OFFICIAL SEAL �� y' ROBIN A BURGESS /„ ?.4 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON i „. COMMISSION NO.344589 `— MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,20`15 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OR ON My commission expires Acct# 10093001 City of Tigard Attn: Accounts Payable 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 • Size a tt5 $a Amount Due $71. *remit to address above • *TIGARD • PLANNING COMMISSION !, CITY OF TIGARD OREGON NOTICE: PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGENDA ITEM#:7'/ ° Pager of DATE OF HEARING/// /D CASE NUMBER(S): OP 1- 66 - IDO • 57 -ODOo A 'APPLICANT: or 77 r cI oe'�'j 6t il'�/•Yt L°s1A LOCATION: /1 / f� PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) Name: Name: l.2 (�er(-Lj a 01 Address: Address: 1\ 0 1 1 e yva/6^ City: State: Zip: City: i■G` 4 State: UR-- Zip: q-2 2' 2-3 Name: Name: lam_ i ` )Q, Address: Address: ' \ ���nn L\`h City: State: Zip: City: State: O Zip: Z Name: a:\-j 01') Name: • Address: 1 I4 g' 54") .• i°A;gI U...t,i (- Address: City: ( e`l`^~ State: CD P- Zip: Cr 7 City: State: Zip: Name: +1P?6tOjk- 2V1)9 ■// )4 Name: Address: .. u .!,>r S'' Address: Ci : 1 ! State: Zi.: •1 ZZ_? Ci : State: Zi.: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: • Agenda Item: 7. if Hearing Date: December 20 2004 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF TIGARD ciry of osea Community Development FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Shaping A Better Community SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: PLAN AND CODE AMENDMENT INCORPORATING REVISED FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION (FEMA) REQUIREMENTS. CASE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 2004-00003 Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 2004-00002 PROPOSAL: The City proposes to amend Chapter 3, Natural Features and Open Space, Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Lands chapter (18.775) of the Tigard Development Code by revising references to the updated FEMA Flood Impact Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIIRM), effective February 18, 2005, and regulating recreational vehicles located in the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 100-Year Floodplain within the City of Tigard's incorporated boundary. COMP PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION All designations and zones within the floodplain. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380,18.390 and 18.775; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 3.2; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 7. SECTION IL STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt revised references to the updated National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Tigard effective February 18, 2005, and amend the Sensitive Lands requirements in the Tigard Development Code to regulate recreational vehicles located in the 100-year floodplain. CPA2004-0000320A2004-00002 PAGE 1 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On August 18th, 2004, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) notified the City of the final flood elevation determination for the City of Tigard. FEMA requires the City, as a condition of continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet NFIP standards. By determining the base flood elevation, and assuring that structures are built in accordance with the NFIP regulations through the use of the elevation or flood-proofing information, local officials can assure that structures qualify for significantly lower flood insurance rates than policies rated with the base flood elevation undetermined. In 1982 FEMA issued a Flood Impact Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) that identified the Special Flood Hazard Areas, areas subject to inundation by the base (1 percent annual chance) flood in the Tigard area. As a result of a recent reevaluation of flood hazards FEMA provided the City with preliminary copies of the FIS and FIRM that identify existing flood hazard in the Tigard area, including Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). These proposed BFEs were published in the Tigard Times on April 15 and April 22, 2004 and in the Federal Register at 67 FR 44634 on July 7, 2004. No appeals were made of the proposed BFEs. As such, the BFEs are considered final and will become effective February 18, 2005. Pursuant to Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, FEMA requires the City to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet the standards of Paragraph 60.3(d) of the NFIP by the effective date for the City's continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. The City's current development code meets or exceeds all of these standards with few exceptions. If adopted, the proposed attached amendments would satisfy the FEMA requirements and retain the City's eligibility to participate in the NFIP. To meet these standards, the City proposes to amend Chapter 3, Natural Features and Open Space, Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Lands chapter (18.775) of the Tigard Development Code. The proposed amendments revise references to the updated FEMA Flood Impact Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), effective February 18, 2005, and add language regulating recreational vehicles located in the 100-year floodplain (See attached Exhibit A— Proposed Plan and Code Text Changes). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.0600 states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197; Notice was provided to DLCD 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following Statewide Planning Goals are applicable to this proposal: Statewide Planning Goal 1 — Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. Notice was sent to 362 property owners representing 506 affected properties. Two Public Hearings are being held (one before the Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) in which public input is welcome. CPA2004-0000320A2004-00002 PAGE 2 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • Statewide Planning Goal 2 — Land Use Planning: • This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process for and policies to review changes to the Development Code consistent with Goal 2. The City's plan provides analysis and policies with which to evaluate a request for amending the Code consistent with Goal 2. Statewide Planning Goal 7 —Areas Subject to Natural Hazards: This goal is designed to protect people and property from natural hazards, including flooding. It requires that new hazard inventory information provided by federal agencies be reviewed by DLCD in conjunction with local government representatives. Local governments will be deemed to comply with Goal 7 for riverine flood hazards by adopting and implementing local floodplain regulations that meet the minimum National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements. The proposed amendments would meet the minimum NFIP requirements. APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTES Title 44, Chapter I, Part 60, Section 60.3 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR). This section includes federal floodplain management criteria for flood-prone areas. Communities adopting these criteria are eliblible for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. The City's Development Code currently incorporates most of these criteria. With adoption of the proposed amendments the code would meet the criteria in Section 60.3 CFR. APPLICABLE METRO REGULATIONS: Title 3: Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (Metro code 3.07.300) The intent of Title 3 is to protect the beneficial water uses and functions and values of resources within the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas. Cities can comply with the provisions of this title by amending their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances to adopt all or part of the Title 3 Model Ordinance or code language that 4 substantially complies with the performance standards and the intent of the title. Cities must also adopt either the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map or a map which substantially complies with the Metro map. The City complies with Metro's Title 3 requirements through reference to Clean Water Services' (CWS) standards which are implemented through the Tigard Development Code. Metro's Flood Management Area Map for the Fanno Creek watershed is based on the data generated by CWS, the City of Tigard, City of Beaverton, and Washington County during development of the Fanno Creek Watershed Plan. This information was submitted to FEMA in 2000 and is the basis for the current Flood Insurance Rate Map, effective February 2005. Therefore, adoption of the proposed reference to the revised FEMA FIRM will be consistent with Title 3 map requirements. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1: General Policies This policy states that all future legislative changes shall be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Regional Plan adopted by Metro. As indicated above under the individual Statewide and Regional Plan goals applicable to this proposed amendment, the amendment is consistent with the Statewide Goals and the Regional Plan. CPA2004-000031Z0A2004-00002 PAGE 3 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3.: Citizen Involvement These policies state that the City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program, provide opportunities for citizen involvement appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and that information on land use planning issues shall be available in understandable form for all interested citizens. This policy is satisfied because notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all interested parties and 362 notices were mailed to owners of property located in the floodplain that may be affected by the proposed amendment. In addition, notice was published in the Tigard Times of the Planning Commission public hearing and notice will be published again prior to the City Council public hearing. Public input has been invited in the notice. The written notices were written in plain understandable form, and included phone numbers and a contact person for anyone who may have questions. Comprehensive Plan Policies 3: Natural Features and Open Space, This chapter addresses a broad range of topics all having to do with the natural resources located with the Tigard Urban Planning Area. Section 3.2, Floodplains, refers to the Floodplain and Floodway as defined by the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Tigard dated September 1, 1981. The proposed amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan would update this reference to the revised FIS and FIRM, effective February 18, 2005. • APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE CITY'S IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES. Tigard Development Code Section 18.775: Sensitive Lands The regulations of this chapter are intended to implement the comprehensive plan and the City's floodplain management program as required by the National Flood Insurance Program, and help to preserve natural sensitive land areas from encroaching use and to maintain the zero-foot rise floodway elevation. Section 18.775.040.B addresses the areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled The Flood Insurance Study of the City of Tigard, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps which are adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this chapter. The section also includes land use regulations for development within the floodplain. With adoption of the proposed amendments to this section of the code, the code will effectively implement the comprehensive plan and the City's flood management program as required-by the NFIP (See attached Exhibit A— Proposed Development Code Text Changes). Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380: Zoning Map and Text Amendments This chapter sets forth the standards and process governing legislative and quasi-judicial amendments to this title and zoning district map. Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Therefore, the proposed text amendments to the Tigard Development Code will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Section 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors (reviewed above), including: 1) Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines, 2) applicable federal of state statues of regulations, 3) applicable METRO regulations, 4) applicable comprehensive plan policies, and 5) applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. CPA2004-00003/Z0A2004-00002 PAGE 4 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • SECTION V. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Long Range Planning Division, Building Division, Community Development Department, and Public Works have had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. SECTION VL OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS Metro, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, division of State Lands, and US Army Corps of Engineers were notified of the proposed amendments and did not respond. The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development commented on the proposal as follows: DLCD Staff reviewed Tigard's existing ordinance to see if any NFIP-related issues (beyond the reference to the new maps) needed to be addressed in the ordinance update. DLCD Staff agreed with the City's plans to update 18.775.040 (B) to reference the current flood insurance study and maps. Response: The proposed amendments include references to updated FIS and FIRM, effective February 18, 2005. DLCD Staff suggested the City add in the NFIP standards for recreational vehicles required per 44 CFR 60.3(c)(14). Response: The proposed amendments include standards for recreational vehicles. DLCD Staff suggested the City may want to clarify that section 18.775.040(L), for residential construction in the floodplain, applies in special flood hazard areas where base flood elevation data has been provided. Response: Subsection L clearly applies in special flood hazard areas as indicated by the section title: General Provisions for Floodplain Areas, and specifically identified • in Subsection B, Special Flood Hazards, which includes references to the FIS and FIRM, effective Feb, 18, 2004 that provide base elevation data. Therefore, staff believes clarification is not warranted. DLCD Staff suggested the City update Chapter 18.120— Definitions, to address the following issues (DLCD staff noted that definitions are not required by FEMA as among those standards required to retain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program): ---The city defines basement (definition #25), but the definition does not match the NFIP definition for basement. This could result in incorrect application of the NFIP standards found in 18.775. I strongly recommend that the city add the NFIP definition of basement into the flood-related definitions found at 71. "Basement"- any area of a building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all sides. Response: The City's definition of basement involves definitions of "basement", "story", and "story, first": #25. "Basement" -Any floor level below the first story in a building, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless such floor level qualifies as first story as defined in this section. CPA2004-0000320A2004-00002 PAGE 5 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION #128. "Story" - That portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above, except that the topmost story shall be that portion of a building included between the upper surface of the topmost floor and the ceiling or roof above. If the finished floor level directly above a basement or unused under-floor space is more than six feet above grade as defined in this section for more than 50 percent of the total perimeter or is more than 12 feet above grade as defined in this section at any point, such basement or unused under-floor space shall be considered as a story. #129. "Story, first" - The lowest story in a building which qualifies as a story, as defined in this section, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor shall be classified as a first story, provided such floor level is not more than four feet below grade, as defined in this section, for more than 50 percent of the total perimeter, or more than eight feet below grade, as defined in this section, at any point. Staff agrees the City's definition of "basement" does not match NFIP's definition, but believes the difference would be unlikely to result in an incorrect application of the NFIP standards. As applied in the City's floodplain regulations, it is a building's "lowest floor, including basement" that must be elevated above the base flood elevation, which can only be construed to not allow any floors, basement or otherwise, below that level. This was confirmed by discussion with the City Building Official. Therefore, staff believes no changes are warranted. ---The city should also clarify which definition of development it uses for floodplain purposes. Chapter 18.120 has a definition (#56) and Chapter 18.775 has a definition of sorts (18.775.020(A), but this one may not apply to the floodplain? The language in 18.775.020(A) is very similar to the NFIP definition but is under a section about stormwater connection permits. The NFIP defines "development" as - any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation, or drilling operations located within the area of special flood hazard. Response: The City defines "development" in Chapters 18.120 and 18.775 are as follows: 18.120.030 Meaning of Specific Words and Terms A. For additional words and terms, also see Use Classifications (Chapter 18.130); Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage (Chapter 18.755); Sensitive Lands (Chapter 18.775); Signs (Chapter 18.780 ; Tree Removal (Chapter 18.790); and Wireless Communication Facilities (Chapter 18.798). As used in this title, the following words and phrases mean: #56. "Development" - 1) A building or mining,operation; 2) a material change in the use or appearance of a structure or land; or 3) division of land into two or more parcels, including partitions and subdivisions as provided in Oregon Revised Statutes 92. 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses: Permitted, Prohibited, and Nonconforming A. CWS Stormwater Connection Permit. All proposed development must obtain a Stormwater Connection Permit from CWS pursuant to its Design and Construction Standards. As used in this chapter, the meaning of the word development shall be as defined in the CWS Design and Construction Standards: All human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: 1. Construction of structures requiring a building permit, if such structures are external to existing structures; 2. Land division; 3. Drilling; 4. Site alterations resulting from surface mining or dredging; 5. Grading; 6. Construction of earthen berms; 7. Paving; 8. Excavation; or CPA2004-00003/Z0A2004-00002 PAGE 6 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • 9. Clearing when it results in the removal of trees or vegetation which would require a permit from the local jurisdiction or an Oregon Department of Forestry tree removal permit. 10. The following activities are not included in the definition of development: a. Farming activities when conducted in accordance with accepted farming practices as defined in ORS 30.930 and under a Senate Bill 1010 water quality management plan; b. Construction, reconstruction, or modification of a single family residence on an existing lot of record within a subdivision that was approved by the City or County after September 9, 1995 (from ORS 92.040(2)); and c. Any development activity for which land use approvals have been issued pursuant to a land use application submitted to the City or County on or before February 4, 2000, and deemed complete or before March 15, 2000. The meaning as defined in Chapter 18.120 applies generally to Title 18. The meaning as defined in Chapter 18.775 applies explicitly to that chapter and specifically to the floodplain. Therefore, the City uses the latter definition with respect to floodplains. The general meaning in both the City's and NFIP's definitions is substantially the same. However, the NFIP definition is generally more inclusive, while the City's definition includes several exemptions. Because the definitions are similar, staff believes no changes are warranted. ---The city has a definition for recreational vehicle (#117). This definition is different than the NFIP definition. The city should consider whether its existing definition needs to be updated. The NFIP definition is: (a) built on a single chassis, (b) 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection, (c) designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck, and (d) designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. Response: The City defines "recreational vehicle" as follows: 18.120.030. #117: "Recreational vehicles" - A vacation trailer or other unit, with or without motor power, which is designed for human occupancy and to be used temporarily for recreation or emergency purposes. The unit shall be identified as a recreational vehicle by the manufacturer. Although the City's definition does not specify type of chassis or limit the size, it does address mobility and primary use of a recreational vehicle. The City's definition is generally more inclusive than the NFIP definition. Therefore, Staff believes the City's definition is substantially similar and does not warrant changing. ATTACHMENT: EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCORPORATING REVISED FEMA REQUIREMENTS. • December 3, 2004 • " ' ' r 'jV.a ' ' :genstec er DATE Associate Planner December 3, 2004 - •V • : ': Bic :ewers o DATE Planning Manager CPA2004-0000320A2004-00002 PAGE 7 OF 7 12/20/04 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • EXHIBIT A C PA2004-00003/ZOA2004-00002 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCORPORATING REVISED FEMA REQUIREMENTS. DELETIONS indicated by STRIKEOUT ADDITIONS indicated by BOLD and UNDERLINE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT CHANGES: Chapter 3, NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE Section 3.2, FLOODPLAINS (as referenced in the text by asterisks) *The Floodplain and Floodway, as defined by the Flood Insurance Study for the City of Tigard dated September ; effective February 18, 2005. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT CHANGES: Chapter 18775 SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.010 Purpose B. Implement comprehensive plan and floodplain management program. The regulations of this chapter are intended to implement the comprehensive plan and the city's flood plain management program as required by the National Flood Insurance Program, and help to preserve natural sensitive land areas from encroaching use and to maintain the --0 - •_ _ --e, • •- - revised, the March 20, 2000, February 18, 2005 zero-foot rise floodway elevation. 18.775.040 General Provisions for Floodplain Areas B. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled The Flood Insurance Study of the City of Tigard,. dated September 1, 1981 effective Februa 18 2005, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps effective Februar r 1 nr_T str.ny,e - _ - !:,.• is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of is c apter., _-. -- - - .' e e •- Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Rcctud ; Final 100 Y ar Floodplain, Zero-Rise ■ „ - .e. "-- . III • _ etc -= e e e- - e -• - - - - . This Flood Insurance Study is on file a the Tigard Civic Center. O. Recreational Vehicles. Recreational Vehicles placed on sites within Zones A1-A30 AH, and AE on the community's FIRM either: (i) Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, h) Be full licensed and read for hi•hwa use on its wheels or 'ackin• s stem is a" .c e• o e si eon • uic •isconnec ype u i l ies an• securi y •evices, and has riop�ermanen a c e a i ions° or (iii) fite requirements o , an Tabove and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes. • • Page 1 of 2 Jerree Gaynor - FEMA info for Monday meeting From: "Katherine Meads" <kadeliab @comcast.net> To: "Jerree Gaynor" <jerree @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 12/18/2004 1:43:51 PM Subject: FEMA info for Monday meeting Jerree, I was sent the following article and asked to pass it on the other Planning Commissioners. I understand I need to send it to you also as part of the record. See you then. Kathy Thursday, November 18, 2004, 12:00 A.M. Pacific Permission to reprint or copy this article/photo must be obtained from The Seattle Times. Call 206-464-3113 or e-mail resale @seattletimes.com with your request. Judge: Flood-plain policy ignores impact on salmon By Craig Welch Seattle Times staff reporter The Federal Emergency Management Agency wrongly let tens of thousands of new building developments spring up on some of the region's most flood-prone property without considering the impact to threatened Puget Sound salmon runs, a federal judge has ruled. In the half-decade since Puget Sound chinook were listed for protection, FEMA, the agency that offers insurance to landowners who build in flood plains provided they meet baseline rules to reduce the risk of floods, never consulted with salmon experts at other agencies as required by law, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Zilly ruled this week in Seattle. Instead, FEMA actually encouraged the destruction of salmon habitat by letting landowners avoid regulation if they built within flood plains, Zilly wrote in the decision made public yesterday. Zilly ordered FEMA to have its program reviewed by biologists at NOAA Fisheries and then respond to him within 60 days. Officials with the agency declined to comment. Scientists and environmentalists have complained for years that filling or building in flood plains near rivers from the Nisqually to the Stillaguamish can destroy the stream-side channels that fish flee to when trying to escape rushing flood waters. Constructing streets and parking lots in flood-prone areas also increases the amount of pollution that drains into salmon-bearing streams after heavy rains. Fish enhancement and flood-risk reduction often are in conflict, Zilly wrote. FEMA actually rewards through its rate structure, for example, activities detrimental to fish habitat by encouraging levees, berms and floodwalls. file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\jerree\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 12/20/2004 ��E • Page 2 of 2 While it's not clear whether flood-plain development jeopardizes the government's overall ability to bring back ailing fish runs, "all of our major river systems have places where development has been a problem for chinook," said DeeAnn Kirkpatrick, a fish-habitat biologist with NOAA Fisheries in Seattle. And in the first three years after chinook were first protected in 1999 under the Endangered Species Act(ESA),FEMA provided 26,000 new flood-insurance policies for structures within the fish's habitat, according to court records. "The whole point of salmon listings was that we were going to have to change the way we do business," said Jan Hasselman, an attorney with the National Wildlife Federation who sued FEMA on behalf of environmentalists. "But FEMA was AWOL; they kept authorizing more and more development." Officially, counties regulate flood-plain development. But in order for landowners to get flood insurance, those regulations must meet minimum requirements established by FEMA. Most counties in Puget Sound have development rules that are even more strict. FEMA rewards them with reduced insurance rates. The ruling won't affect landowners with existing flood insurance, and the judge did not halt the issuance of new flood insurance while the agencies review the program. But environmentalists argued it could change the way flood areas are . developed in the future on waterways here and across the country. M Meanwhile, developers who intervened on the government's behalf in the case were relieved that the judge didn't go even further. "We were concerned that there might essentially be a moratorium on any development in any flood plain where there are listed fish [under the ESA]," said Duane Desiderio, vice president for legal services with the National Association of Homebuilders. "We fully understand that we need to build responsibly. Our concern was that they sought an out-and-outright building - ban." Desiderio said Zilly made clear that he still thinks flood plains can accommodate development. But Desiderio also said he expects another potential legal battle with environmentalists over the scope of Zilly's ruling. Craig Welch: 206-464-2093 or cwelch_@seattletimes.coat http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/general/copyright.html http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/general/copyright.html file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\jerree\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 12/20/2004