Loading...
04/19/2004 - Packet POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes April 19, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER President Padgett called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Red Rock Creek Conference Room, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Padgett; Commissioners Buehner (arrived late), Caffall, Haack, Meads, and Sutton Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Bienerth, Munro, and Webb Staff Present: Barbara Shields, Planning Manager; Duane Roberts, Associate Planner; Jerree Gaynor, Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS There is a meeting next Monday night. The secretary was asked to report back concerning Commissioners being allowed to use their title as a Commissioner in making political endorsements. 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the March 29, 2004 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. Commissioner Buehner arrived after the vote was taken; Commissioner Sutton abstained. 5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Associate Planner Duane Roberts reported on Statewide Goal 10: Housing Rule (Exhibit A). He provided an overview on the planning requirements and the implementation process. He advised that the City needs to look at all the factors when updating our Comprehensive Plan. He reported that 5 years ago, the City adopted a housing maintenance code, which has improved conditions with rental housing. Roberts compared the following census information between 1990 and 2000: • housing units in Tigard have increased from 12,600 to 16,500 • the median rent has increased from $428 to $673, a 57% increase • the median mortgage has increased from $814 to $1,361, a 67% increase • income has increased from $35,700 to $51,600, an increase of 45% PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -April 19,2004-Page 1 ® • • 41% of renters spend more than 30% of their income on rent and related expenses • 23% of homeowners spend more than 30% of their income on mortgage and related expenses It was noted that Goal 10 is about a spectrum of incomes and providing a range of housing opportunities, not just affordable housing. Affordable housing providers have told us that they can't afford to build low to moderate income rentals at densities under 25 units per acre. If the City wants to encourage affordable housing, we could provide land that is zoned 25 and 40 units per acre. Barbara Shields advised that housing will have to be addressed as a part of the Comprehensive Plan update. Duane Roberts noted that Metro adopted Title 1: Requirements for Housing and Employment Accommodation three years ago. It focuses on lower income households, especially those earning 50% and below of the median income. There are three mandatory requirements related to Comp Plan amendments. Roberts advised that the City of Tigard meets two of those requirements. The one we don't meet relates to a statement concerning the City's desire to maintain the existing supply of housing and to encourage and provide opportunities for dispersed housing in the community. Title 7: Affordable Housing spells out a number of land use and non-land use tools that all jurisdictions are required to consider. Roberts gave an overview of Tigard's Affordable Housing Program (Exhibit B), which has been adopted by Council. Roberts reported that staff will come back to the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for an amendment to the Comp Plan saying that the City is supportive of maintaining the existing supply of housing in the community and is in support of dispersing affordable housing throughout the community. The Commissioners looked at the sample language in their packets under 6.3.1 (from the City of Tualatin). In Tigard's Comprehensive Plan, there are two policies addressing housing; this would be the third policy. With regard to bullet point#2, President Padgett remarked that it was almost getting into the area of design review. He suggested deleting that item. Under bullet point#4, Commissioner Buehner recommended that the Commission hold a discussion on areas that are allocated for residents age 55 and over. It was recognized that the term "specialized housing" needs to be defined. Duane Roberts will re-draft the language and bring back to the Commission next week for more discussion. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -April 19,2004-Page 2 . • 0 6. OTHER BUSINESS The City Engineer needs a Commissioner to serve on the Transportation Financing Task Force. The Task Force generally meets once a month, and will begin meeting again in May. Commissioner Haack is willing to trade places on the Tree Board for the Transportation Financing Task Force. We will ask Commissioner Bienerth if she is interested in serving on one of the committees. 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. (Jerre aynor, PI ning C mission Secretary A EST: Pre`1 ent Mark Padgett PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -April 19,2004-Page 3 Statewide Goal 10: Housing Intent: To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state Planning Requirements Data requirements A. buildable land inventory 1. compare incomes with housing unit costs ranges 2. vacancy rates by rent & cost level 3. forecast housing demand by rent/cost level 4 housing condition inventory Policy requirements 1. allow for variety of densities and types of residences - detached single family houses - row houses - multifamily units - manufactured homes 2. provide appropriate types and amounts of land - housing all income levels 3 provide needed infrastructure 4. consider carrying capacity of land Implementation 1. process for on-going review 2. consider financial incentives a. rehabilitation b. code compliance 3. expedite land use review 1 4. use ordinances and incentives to increase densities 5. additional methods a. tax incentives b. building code revisions c. zoning and land use d. acquisition e. code enforcement f. low income housing dispersal 6. management program with implementation roles • • 0.)thi6;4- Tigard Affordable Housing Program Land use strategies • An updated and streamlined development review process • Reduced parking requirements for affordable housing projects • Allowance of accessory dwelling units Non-land use strategies implemented • Tax abatement for affordable housing • A budget set-aside to reduce fees and charges imposed on affordable housing development • Support for sale or donation of tax foreclosed and surplus County and City-owned properties to non-profit housing providers • Financial support for the operation of the Tigard-based Good Neighbor Center homeless shelter • Identification and pursuit of available grants to finance needed on- and off-site public improvements, such as sidewalks, streets, and storm sewers, serving affordable housing areas or projects • The Housing Inspection Program to maintain the quality of the City's existing housing stock • The Housing Emergency Fund to assist occupants of housing declared to be unsafe or uninhabitable • The Enhanced Safety Program, administered through the Tigard Police Department, to improve the safety of rental properties • Membership in the County-wide Housing Advocacy Group • A M- I CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL HEARING DATE: - /q-40/ STARTING TIME: �.4 COMMISSIONERS: MARK PADGETT (PRESIDENT) JODIE BIENERTH GRETCHEN BUEHNER REX CAFFALL V BILL HAACK KATHY MEADS JUDY MUNRO ✓/ SCOT SUTTON EILEEN WEBB STAFF PRESENT: DICK BEWERSDORFF JIM HENDRYX BRAD KILBY ✓ BARBARA SHIELDS MORGAN TRACY JULIA HAJDUK MATT SCHEIDEGGER ✓ DUANE ROBERTS KIM MCMILLAN BETH ST. AMAND GUS DUENAS s# s- • CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Duane Roberts DATE: 4/12/04 SUBJECT: Housing Attached are copies of the formal state and regional housing-related statements that local comprehensive plans are required to carry out. The three include Statewide Goal 10: Housing, Metro Title 1: Requirements for Housing and Employment Accommodation, and Metro Title 7: Affordable Housing. Attached also is a copy of existing and proposed Tigard comprehensive plan policies addressing housing. This is informational agenda item. The state and regional documents provide the policy framework for the proposed update of the housing section of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • • Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals & Guidelines GOAL 10: HOUSING OAR 660-015-0000(10) To provide for the housing needs of Needed Housing Units-- means citizens of the state. housing types determined to meet the Buildable lands for residential use need shown for housing within an urban shall be inventoried and plans shall growth boundary at particular price encourage the availability of adequate ranges and rent levels. On and after the numbers of needed housing units at beginning of the first periodic review of a price ranges and rent levels which are local government's acknowledged commensurate with the financial comprehensive plan, "needed housing capabilities of Oregon households and units" also includes allow for flexibility of housing location, government-assisted housing. For cities type and density. having populations larger than 2,500 Buildable Lands-- refers to people and counties having populations lands in urban and urbanizable areas larger than 15,000 people, "needed that are suitable, available and housing units" also includes (but is not necessary for residential use. limited to) attached and detached Government-Assisted Housing single-family housing, multiple-family -- means housing that is financed in housing, and manufactured homes, whole or part by either a federal or state whether occupied by owners or renters. housing agency or a local housing authority as defined in ORS 456.005 to GUIDELINES 456.720, or housing that is occupied by a tenant or tenants who benefit from A. PLANNING rent supplements or housing vouchers 1. In addition to inventories of provided by either a federal or state buildable lands, housing elements of a housing agency or a local housing comprehensive plan should, at a authority. minimum, include: (1) a comparison of Household-- refers to one or the distribution of the existing population more persons occupying a single by income with the distribution of housing unit. available housing units by cost; (2) a Manufactured Homes-- means determination of vacancy rates, both structures with a Department of Housing overall and at varying rent ranges and and Urban Development (HUD) label cost levels; (3) a determination of certifying that the structure is expected housing demand at varying constructed in accordance with the rent ranges and cost levels; (4) National Manufactured Housing allowance for a variety of densities and Construction and Safety Standards Act types of residences in each community; of 1974 (42 USC 5401 et seq.), as and (5) an inventory of sound housing in amended on August 22, 1981. urban areas including units capable of being rehabilitated. 1 • • 2. Plans should be developed in accordance with zoning ordinances and a manner that insures the provision of with provisions of comprehensive plans. appropriate types and amounts of land 4. Ordinances and incentives within urban growth boundaries. Such should be used to increase population land should be necessary and suitable densities in urban areas taking into for housing that meets the housing consideration (1) key facilities, (2) the needs of households of all income economic, environmental, social and levels. energy consequences of the proposed 3. Plans should provide for the densities and (3) the optimal use of appropriate type, location and phasing existing urban land particularly in of public facilities and services sufficient sections containing significant amounts to support housing development in of unsound substandard structures. areas presently developed or 5. Additional methods and undergoing development or devices for achieving this goal should, redevelopment. after consideration of the impact on 4. Plans providing for housing lower income households, include, but needs should consider as a major not be limited to: (1) tax incentives and determinant the carrying capacity of the disincentives; (2) building and air, land and water resources of the construction code revision; (3) zoning planning area. The land conservation and land use controls; (4) subsidies and and development actions provided for loans; (5) fee and less-than-fee by such plans should not exceed the acquisition techniques; (6) enforcement carrying capacity of such resources. of local health and safety codes; and (7) coordination of the development of B. IMPLEMENTATION urban facilities and services to disperse 1. Plans should provide for a low income housing throughout the continuing review of housing need planning area. projections and should establish a 6. Plans should provide for a process for accommodating needed detailed management program to assign revisions. respective implementation roles and 2. Plans should take into account responsibilities to those governmental the effects of utilizing financial bodies operating in the planning area incentives and resources to (a) stimulate and having interests in carrying out the • the rehabilitation of substandard goal. housing without regard to the financial capacity of the owner so long as benefits accrue to the occupants; and (b) bring into compliance with codes adopted to assure safe and sanitary housing the dwellings of individuals who cannot on their own afford to meet such codes. 3. Decisions on housing development proposals should be expedited when such proposals are in 2 11, 411 REGIONAL FUNCTIONAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS TITLE 1 : REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT ACCOMMODATION 3 .07 . 110 Purpose and Intent One goal of the Framework Plan is the efficient use of land. Title 1 intends to use land within the UGB efficiently by increasing its capacity to accommodate housing and employment. Title 1 directs each city and county in the region to consider actions to increase its capacity and to take action if necessary to accommodate its share of regional growth as specified in this title. (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) 3. 07 .120 Housing and Employment Capacity A. Each city and county shall determine its capacity for housing and employment in order to ensure that it provides and continues to provide at least the capacity for the city or county specified in Table 3 . 01-7. Local governments shall use data provided by Metro unless the Metro Council or the Chief Operating Officer determines that data preferred by a city or county is more accurate. B. A city or county shall determine its capacity for dwelling units by cumulating the minimum number of dwelling units authorized in each zoning district in which dwelling units are authorized. A city or county may use a higher number of dwellings than the minimum density for a zoning district if development in the five years prior to the determination has actually occurred at the higher number. C. If a city annexes county territory, the city shall ensure that there is no net loss in regional housing or employment capacity, as shown on Table 3 . 07-1, as a result of amendments of comprehensive plan or land use regulations that apply to the annexed territory. D. After completion of its initial determination of capacity, each city or county shall report changes in its capacity by April 15 of the first calendar year following completion of its initial determination and by April 15 of every following year. (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-972A, Sec. 1; Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 6 411 410 3 . 07 . 130 Design Type Boundaries Requirement For each of the following 2040 Growth Concept design types, city and county comprehensive plans shall be amended to include the boundaries of each area, determined by the city or county consis- tent with the general locations shown on the 2040 Growth Concept Map: Central City--Downtown Portland is the Central City which serves as the major regional center, an employment and cultural center for the metropolitan area. Regional Centers--Seven regional centers will become the focus of compact development, redevelopment and high-quality transit service and multimodal street networks. Station Communities--Nodes of development centered approximately one-half mile around a light rail or high capacity transit station that feature a high-quality pedestrian environment. Town Centers--Local retail and services will be provided in town centers with compact development and transit service. Main Streets--Neighborhoods will be served by main streets with retail and service developments served by transit. Corridors--Along good quality transit lines, corridors feature a high-quality pedestrian environment, convenient access to tran- sit, and somewhat higher than current densities . Employment Areas--Various types of employment and some residen- tial development are encouraged in employment areas with limited commercial uses . Industrial Areas--Industrial area are set aside primarily for industrial activities with limited supporting uses . Regionally Significant Industrial Areas--Industrial areas with site characteristics that are relatively rare in the region that render them especially suitable for industrial use. Inner Neighborhoods--Residential areas accessible to jobs and neighborhood businesses with smaller lot sizes are inner neigh- borhoods . Outer Neighborhoods--Residential neighborhoods farther away from large employment centers with larger lot sizes and lower densi- ties are outer neighborhoods . (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 7 111 111 (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) 3 . 07 . 140 Measures to Increase Development Capacity A. Each city and county shall adopt a minimum dwelling unit density, as prescribed in this subsection, for each zoning district in which dwelling units are authorized inside the UGB: 1 . Any city or county minimum density standard deemed to comply with the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan pursuant to Section 3. 07 . 810 prior to January 1, 2003, shall be deemed to comply with this subsection. 2 . A city or county shall not approve a subdivision or development application that will result in a density below the minimum density for the zoning district. 3. A city or county may change the dwelling unit density of any zoning district so long as the zoning district continues to comply with this subsection and so long as the city or county continues to provide at least the overall capacity for housing for the city or county specified in Table 3 . 07-1 . B. A city or county shall not prohibit the partition or subdivision of a lot or parcel that is at least twice the size of the minimum size for new lots or parcels in any zoning district in which dwelling units are authorized. C. A city or county shall authorize the establishment of at least one accessory dwelling unit for each detached single- family dwelling unit in a zoning district and for each detached or attached single-family dwelling unit in a Regional Center or Station Community. The authorization may be subject to reasonable regulation for siting and design purposes . D. In order to assist Metro to evaluate the effectiveness of Title 1 in aid of accomplishment of the 2040 Growth Concept, and to comply with state progress reporting requirements in ORS 197 . 301, by April 15 of each even-numbered year beginning 2004, each city and county shall report to Metro the actual density of new residential development per net developed acre authorized in those zoning districts that allow residential development in the preceding 24 months . (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 - 8 411 411 3 . 07 . 150 Transfer of Capacity A. A city or county may amend its comprehensive plan and land use regulations to transfer capacity for housing or employment shown on Table 3 . 07-1 to another city or county inside the UGB upon a demonstration that: 1 . The transfer complies with the policies of the Regional Framework Plan; 2 . The transfer will not reduce the capacity of the region for housing or employment specified on Table 3. 07-1; 3 . The housing or employment capacity to be transferred is reasonably likely to occur at the receiving site within the 20-year planning period of Metro' s last UGB capacity review under ORS 197 . 299; and 4 . The transfer does not move capacity from a designated Center to an Inner or Outer Neighborhood, or from a Regional Center to a Town Center. B. A city or county may seek a transfer of capacity as authorized in subsection A by filing an application on a form provided for that purpose by Metro. After receipt of a complete application, Metro shall set the matter for a public hearing before the Metro Council and shall notify MPAC and those persons who request notification of requests for transfers of capacity. C. The Metro Council shall hold a public hearing to consider the request for a transfer of capacity. Any person may participate in the hearing. The Metro Council may set terms and conditions upon approval of a transfer so long as they relate to the criteria in subsection A and are incorporated into the Metro Council' s order. D. The Metro Council shall issue an order with its conclusions and analysis and send a copy to the local governments involved in the transfer and any person who participated in the hearing before the Metro Council . Any person who participated in the hearing may seek review of the Metro Council' s order as a land use decision under ORS 197 . 015 (10) (a) (A) . (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 01-925E, Sec. 4; Ordinance No. 02-972A, Sec. 1; Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 9 3. 07 . 160 Local Plan Accommodation of Expected Growth Capacity for Housing and Employment—Performance Standard All cities and counties within Metro shall demonstrate that: A. The provisions required in Section 3 . 07 . 140 of this title have been included in comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances; and B. Using the computation method in Section 3 . 07 . 120, calculated capacities will achieve the target capacities for dwelling units and full-time and part-time jobs contained in Table 3 .07-1; and C. Effective measures have been taken to reasonably assure that the calculated capacities will be built for dwelling units and jobs; and D. Expected development has been permitted at locations and densities likely to be achieved during the 20-year planning period by the private market or assisted housing programs, once all new regulations are in effect. (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) 3 . 07 . 170 Design Type Density Recommendations A. For the area of each of the 2040 Growth Concept design types, the following average densities for housing and employment are recommended to cities and counties : Central City - 250 persons per acre Regional Centers - 60 persons per acre Station Communities - 45 persons per acre Town Centers - 40 persons per acre Main Streets - 39 persons per acre Corridor - 25 persons per acre Employment Areas - 20 persons per acre Industrial Areas - 9 employees per acre Regionally Significant Industrial Area - 9 employees per acre Inner Neighborhoods - 14 persons per acre Outer Neighborhoods - 13 persons per acre (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 10 • • Table 3.07-I City or County 12wulllug Unit Capacity Job Capacity Beaverton 13,635 21,368 Cornelius 1,285 3,054 Durham 243 522 Fairview 2,929 7,063 Forest Grove 3,054 _ 5,943 Gladstone 880 1,569 Gresham3 20,020 27,679 Happy Valley's 5,705 1,418 Hillsboro5 16,106 59,566 Johnson City 38 82 King City 461 470 Lake Oswego 4,049 13,268 Maywood Park 12 5 Milwaukie 3,188 3,650 Oregon City cJ 750 8,298 Portland3 �. 72,136 209,215 Rivergrove 20 0 Sherwood 5,216 9,518 Tigard 6,308 17,801 Troutdale 3,260 7,222 Tualatin - 4,054 12,301 West Linn 3,732 1,935 Wilsonville2 _ 4,425 15,030 Wood Village 458 1,074 Clackamas County2 13,340 31,901 Multnomah Count 8 0 0 Washington County 51,649 55,921 Regional Total 246,053 516,873 'Standards apply to the urban unincorporated portion ol'the county only, 2 Wilsonville has not completed its capacity analysis(as of October 2002), 1996 Title I data used, 3lncludes capacity for Pleasant Valley Concept Plan, Cornier Urban Reserve Nos.4 and 5. 4lncludes capacity for former Urban Reserve Nos. 14 and 15. 5lncludes capacity for former Urban Reserve No, 55, 6lncludes capacity for former Urban Reserve No.47. 7 Includes capacity for former Urban Reserve No,43. 8Capacity for unincorporated Multnomah County is included In the capacities of'the Cities of'Gresham, Portland and Troutdale. (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 02-969B, Sec. 1 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 11 TITLE 7: AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3.07 .710 Intent The Regional Framework Plan stated the need to provide affordable housing opportunities through: a) a diverse range of housing types, available within the region, and within cities and counties inside Metro' s Urban Growth Boundary; b) sufficient and affordable housing opportunities available to households of all income levels that live or have a member working in each jurisdiction and subregion; c) an appropriate balance of jobs and housing of all types within subregions; d) addressing current and future need for and supply of affordable housing in the process used to determine affordable housing production goals; and e) minimizing any concentration of poverty. The Regional Framework Plan directs that Metro' s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan include voluntary affordable housing production goals to be adopted by local jurisdictions in the region as well as land use and non-land use affordable housing tools and strategies . The Regional Framework Plan also directs that Metro' s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan include local governments' reporting progress towards increasing the supply of affordable housing. Title 1 of this functional plan requires cities and counties to change their zoning to accommodate development at higher densi- ties in locations supportive of the transportation system. Increasing allowable densities and requiring minimum densities encourage compact communities, more efficient use of land and should result in additional affordable housing opportunities . These Title 1 requirements are parts of the regional affordable housing strategy. (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No . 00-882C, Sec. 2 . ) 3 . 07 .720 Voluntary Affordable Housing Production Goals Each city and county within the Metro region should adopt the Affordable Housing Production Goal indicated in Table 3 . 07-7 for their city or county as a guide to measure progress toward meeting the affordable housing needs of households with incomes between 0% and 50% of the regional median family income . (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2; Ordinance No. 03-1005A. ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 - 41 411 Ilk 3.07 .730 Requirements for Comprehensive Plan and Implementing Ordinance Changes A. Cities and counties within the Metro region shall ensure that their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances : 1 . Include strategies to ensure a diverse range of housing types within their jurisdictional boundaries . 2 . Include in their plans actions and implementation measures designed to maintain the existing supply of affordable housing as well as increase the opportunities for new dispersed affordable housing within their boundaries . 3 . Include plan policies, actions, and implementation measures aimed at increasing opportunities for households of all income levels to live within their individual jurisdictions in affordable housing. B. Cities and counties within the Metro region shall consider amendment of their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances with the following affordable housing land use tools and strategies identified below. Compliance with this subsection is achieved when the governing body of a city or county considers each tool or strategy in this subsection and either amends its comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances to adopt the tool or strategy or explains in writing why it has decided not to adopt it. 1 . Density Bonus . A density bonus is an incentive to facilitate the development of affordable housing. Local jurisdictions could consider tying the amount of bonus to the targeted income group to encourage the development of affordable units to meet affordable housing production goals . 2 . Replacement Housing. No-Net-Loss housing policies for local jurisdictional review of requested quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan Map amendments with approval criteria that would require the replacement of existing housing that would be lost through the Plan Map amendment. 3. Inclusionary Housing. a. Implement voluntary inclusionary housing programs tied to the provision of incentives such as Density Bonus incentives to facilitate the development of affordable housing. (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 - 42 0 b. Develop housing design requirements for housing components such as single-car garages and maximum square footage that tend to result in affordable housing. c. Consider impacts on affordable housing as a criterion for any legislative or quasi-judicial zone change. 4 . Transfer of Development Rights . a. Implement TDR programs tailored to the specific conditions of a local jurisdiction. b. Implement TDR programs in Main Street or Town Center areas that involve upzoning. 5 . Elderly and People with Disabilities. Examine zoning codes for conflicts in meeting locational needs of these populations. 6 . Local Regulatory Constraints; Discrepancies in Planning and Zoning Codes; Local Permitting or Approval Process . a. Revise the permitting process (conditional use permits, etc. ) . b. Review development and design standards for impact on affordable housing. c. Consider using a cost/benefit analysis to determine impact of new regulations on housing production. d. Regularly review existing codes for usefulness and conflicts. e. Reduce number of land use appeal opportunities. f. Allow fast tracking of affordable housing. 7 . Parking. a. Review parking requirements to ensure they meet the needs of residents of all types of housing. b. Coordinate strategies with developers, transportation planners and other regional efforts (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 - 43 • so as to reduce the cost of providing parking in affordable housing developments . (Ordinance No. 97-715B, Sec. 1 . Amended by Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2; Ordinance No. 03-1005A, Sec. 1 . ) 3.07 .740 Requirements for Progress Report Progress made by local jurisdictions in amending comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances and consideration of land use related affordable housing tools and strategies to meet the voluntary affordable housing production goals shall be reported according to the following schedule: A. By January 31, 2002, cities and counties within the Metro region shall submit a brief status report to Metro as to what items they have considered and which items remain to be considered. This analysis could include identification of affordable housing land use tools currently in use as well as consideration of the land use tools in Section 3 . 07 .730 (B) . B. By December 31, 2003, each city and county within the Metro region shall provide a report to Metro on the status of its comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances explaining how each tool and strategy in subsection 3 . 07 .730B was considered by its governing body. The report shall describe comprehensive plan and implementing ordinance amendments pending or adopted to implement each tool and strategy, or shall explain why the city or county decided not to adopt it. C. By June 30, 2004, each city and county within the Metro region shall report to Metro on the outcome of the amendments to its comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances pending at the time of submittal of the report described in subsection B of this section and on the public response, if any, to any implementation adopted by the city or county to increase the community' s stock of affordable housing, including but not limited to the tools and strategies in subsection 3 .07 . 730B. (Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2 . Amended by Ordinance No. 03-1005A, Sec. 1 . ) 3 .07.750 Metro Assessment of Progress A. Metro Council and MPAC shall review progress reports submitted by cities and counties and may provide comments to the jurisdictions. (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 — 44 B. Metro Council shall: 1 . In 2003, estimate 2000 baseline affordable housing units affordable to defined income groups (less than 30 percent, 31-50 percent, 51-80 percent of the region' s median family income) using 2000 U.S . Census data; 2 . By December 2004, formally assess the region' s progress made in 2001-2003 to achieve the affordable housing production goals in Table 3 . 07-7; 3 . By December 2004, review and assess affordable housing tools and strategies implemented by local governments and other public and private entities; 4 . By December 2004, examine federal and state legislative changes; 5. By December 2004, review the availability of a regional funding source; 6. By December 2004, update the estimate of the region' s affordable housing need; and 7 . By December 2004, in consultation with MPAC, create an ad hoc affordable housing task force with representatives of MPAC, MTAC, homebuilders, affordable housing providers, advocate groups, financial institutions, citizens, local governments, state government, and U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department to use the assessment reports and census data to recommend by December 2005 any studies or any changes that are warranted to the existing process, tools and strategies, funding plans or goals to ensure that significant progress is made toward providing affordable housing for those most in need. (Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2 . Amended by Ordinance No. 03-1005A, Sec. 1. ) 3.07 .760 Recommendations to Implement Other Affordable Housing Strategies A. Local jurisdictions are encouraged to consider implementation of the following affordable housing land use tools to increase the inventory of affordable housing throughout the region. Additional information on these strategies and other land use strategies that could be considered by local jurisdictions are described in Chapter (Effective 9/24/03) 3 . 07 - 45 • Four of the Regional Affordable Housing Strategy and its Appendixes . 1 . Replacement Housing. Consider policies to prevent the loss of affordable housing through demolition in urban renewal areas by implementing a replacement housing ordinance specific to urban renewal zones . 2 . Inclusionary Housing. When creating urban renewal districts that include housing, include voluntary inclusionary housing requirements where appropriate. B. Local jurisdictions are encouraged to analyze, adopt and apply locally-appropriate non-land use tools, including fee waivers or funding incentives as a means to make progress toward the Affordable Housing Production Goal . Non-land use tools and strategies that could be considered by local jurisdictions are described in Chapter Four of the Regional Affordable Housing Strategy and its Appendixes . Cities and Counties are also encouraged to report on the analysis, adoption and application of non-land use tools at the same intervals that they are reporting on land-use tools (in Section 3. 07 .740) . C. Local jurisdictions are also encouraged to continue their efforts to promote housing affordable to other households with incomes 50% to 80% and 80% to 120% of the regional median household income. D. Local jurisdictions are encouraged to consider joint coordination or action to meet their combined affordable housing production goals . (Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2 . ) (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 - 46 • U+ • e Table 3.07-7 Five-Year Voluntary Affordable Housing Production Goals (Section 3.07.720) . 2001-2006 Affordable Housing Production Goals Jurisdiction Needed new housing units for Needed new housing units for households earning less than households earning 30-50%of Total 30%of median household income median household income Beaverton 427 229 656 Cornelius 40 10 50 Durham 6 4 10 Fairview 42 31 73 Forest Grove 55 10 65 Gladstone 43 10 _ 53 Gresham 454 102 556 Happy Valley 29 28 57 Hillsboro 302 211 513 Johnson City 0 0 0 King City 5 0 5 Lake Oswego 185 154 339 Maywood Park 0 0 0 Milwaukie 102 0 102 Oregon City 123 35 158 Portland 1,791 0 1,791 Rivergrove 1 1 2 Sherwood 67 56 123 Tigard 216 103 319 Troutdale 75 56 131 Tualatin 120 69 189 West Linn 98 71 169 Wilsonville 100 80 180 Wood Village 16 1 17 Clackamas County,Urban, 729 374 1,103 Unincorporated _ _ Multnomah County,Urban, 81 53 134 Unincorporated* Washington County,Urban 1,312 940 2,252 • Unincorporated _ Total 6,419 2,628 9,047 P. *Strategies and implementation measures addressing these housing goals are in the Progress Reports of the Cities of Portland,Gresham and Troutdale. (Ordinance No. 00-882C, Sec. 2 . ) 1 1 (Effective 9/24/03) 3. 07 — 47 • • Existing and Proposed Comprehensive Plan Housing Policies The Tigard Comprehensive Plan includes two policies, 6.1 .1 and 6.2.1 , that address housing. Under each policy are implementing strategies designed to fulfill the City's housing objectives. 6.1.1 The City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. Implementation strategies include: • Establish a "broad range of zoning districts that allow for a variety of housing types, and comply with the Metropolitan Housing Rule". • Allow for manufactured homes in all the zoning districts. • Provide for opportunities for proposals to develop specialized housing for the area's senior citizens and handicapped based on the needs of these groups by allowing special needs housing for these groups in all development districts. • Coordinate with the Washington County Housing Authority, HUD, and other agencies for the provision of the subsidized housing programs. 6.2.1 The City shall develop clear and concise development regulations and standards to facilitate the streamlining of development proposals, and will eliminate unnecessary provisions which could increase housing costs without corresponding benefit. Implementation strategies include: • The Tigard Code shall include a clear and concise process for the review and approval of development proposals. • The City shall seek ways to minimize the cost of housing by encouraging a variety of home ownership alternatives, such as, but not limited to, townhouses and condominiums. • • The following is an example of a proposed comprehensive plan amendment designed to meet Tigard's last remaining Metro Title 7: Affordable Housing requirement. 6..3.I The City shall develop clear policies, actions, and implementation measures designed to maintain the existing supply of affordable housing as well as increase opportunities for new dispersed affordable housing. • The city shall allow residential uses (mixed commercial and residential) in the Central Business District and Mixed Use Employment 1 and 2 Districts. • The city shall provide housing opportunities for residents with varied income levels and tastes that are aesthetically and functionally compatible with the existing community housing stock. • The city shall allow for manufactured homes in all the zoning districts. • The city shall provide for opportunities for proposals to develop specialized housing for the area's senior citizens and handicapped based on the needs of these groups by allowing special needs housing for these groups in all development districts. • The city shall coordinate with the Washington County Housing Authority, HUD, other government agencies, and private non-profit housing corporations in order to provide the City's fair share of assisted housing units for low and moderate income households. • The City shall establish a set aside with the Social Services and Events Fund intended to offset fees and charges imposed on affordable housing development. • The City shall establish and maintain a tax abatement program for owners or leaseholders of property used to provide affordable housing within the City. 1 • • • The City shall seek grant opportunities to fund needed public improvements serving low income neighborhoods and housing projects. • In order to insure continued safe and sanitary housing, the City shall develop a Residential Property Maintenance Code and hire a full-time Housing Inspector to administer it.