Planning Commission Packet - 03/20/1990 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
_ . ,..
��
��,..
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
I�lARCH 20, 1989 - 7:30 Pt4
TIGAI�D CIVIC CENTER - TOWPi HAY.L
; 13135 3W HALL BLVD.
TIGA32D, OREGON
l. CAL� TO ORaER
,?
,;
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVE MINUTES
4. PLANDTING COMMISSION COMMUNICATTON
5. PUSLIC HEARINGS � prepsr�.ng re�ommendaitiong for Ci�y Council
coneideration:
5.1 PERIODIC REVIEW
5.2 STREET V�CATION SW ILUCUST STREET
5.3 PEDESTRZAId EASEMEN�.' VAGATION LOTS 122 & 123 MORNIN� HILL �fi
6. OTHLR BUSINESS
7. AD30URNMENT
;
I
' i
�
�I
�
�
�
t4
t
�`,
i
k
i
�.
�
�
�
i �,
�
��
`�.I
�
�
�
4
� ':
TIG�IRD PLi�IHG QOl4�ISSIO�
RBGIIL�lR 1�TING - IYiPiRCH 20, 1990
1. Vice �resident Fyre called the meeting �o order at 7:31 PM. The meeting
wae held at the Tigard Givic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 �W Hall Boulevard,
Tigard, Oregone
�. ROLL CAES,: Preeent: Vi.ce Preaid�nt Fyre; Qommissionera �arber,
Fessler, Leverett, Peteraon, and 3aporta.
Absents Commissioners Moen and Caatile. (One vacant
pasition)
S��ff: Se,nior Plann�r Kei�h Lic�en; Associate Planner John
Acker; Planming 5ecretar�r Diane M. Jelderks.
3. 2lPPIt�Vl1L OF 1SINOTSS
i
Commieaion�r Basber moved and Commiseione� Saporta seconded to approve the
minutes from Fe�ruary 20th t�earing as corrected. Motion carried.
Commissioners Fyre, Lever�tt, and Peterson abstained.
�atpmisaioner Fessler mnvecl and Commi�sioner Saporta seaonded to approve the
minutee from February 27th hearing ae aubmitted. Motion carried.
Commissioner Liarber abstained.
4. PT.�lN1�iING OQMl1IS�SION (�Od4�IUN�Ci31T'YON
o Communication wi].1 be reviewed after the public hearings.
Commissfon�ar Peterson arriv�d 8:36 PH.
5. PIIBLIC AE�ItINGS
5.1 PSRIODIC RBVagFI
Aseociate Planner John Acker reva.ewed the procese and schedule for periodic
r�view. The following facto�s were cansidered.
I Change In Circumetanaea
o EPA/Tualatin River Water Quality
o Laxqe Scal� P�aznexa�ions
• o New Inventory Infoxmat.ion
o New Revised 3tatues ?;�����
o Solar Acceee Hea�cix►g �
II New�Amended Go�la or �tules j�'�
o Goal 5 Open Space�/Natural Reeourcee
o Goal 9 Comm�rcial/Indixratrial Lconomic Development �i
;:
o Gosl 11 PubliC G'
,1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 20, 1990 PAG$ 1 ;
t
�.
f
�.
�
� >
III Coneistency with State Agency plane
o DEQ Air, Water, 3olid Waste, Noiee
o ODOT eix year plan
IV Additional Planning Taek Required at the Time of Acknowledgennent
o none
o Hiscussion followed regarding Day care £or children versus adults,
definiti�n for mobile hames, v�cant land available for mnbile home parks,
and hQw the proaees would work.
o Comriseioner Fessler requested tha�t copiea of thQ ORS bille be included !
when they �°evi�w Compreheneive Plan Amendments and Zone Ordinance
Amendmenta.
a�vsLac �ssTxHOiax
o Carl Johnson, 8965 SW Burnharn Street, migard, 97223, read and eubmitted a �
letter expressing his concerns about the Sensitive Lande Section of the
Tigard Community Ac�v�lopxnent Cods.
PIJBLIC ASAIPTNG CI,OSFDD
o Diecuseion followed re ardin the racess and how to handle the findin s.
9 5 P �
* Commisaioner Barber maveci and Commissian�r Peterson aeconded to recoinmend
to City �ouncil ta forward the �aropoaed periodic review order to DLCD as
the City'e re��unee to the periadic review notice; giving particular
attention to mobile home parke, manufactured homes, and eensitiv� land�.
Motion carried unanimouely by Commis�inners present.
5.2 S�T VACATION SW I,OCCIST STRE'�T
Senior Planer Liden reviewed the request for �racat3.on of a portion of SW
Locuat Street and made staff'e ��commendation fox approval.
PIIBLIC TSSTIbIANY
i o No one �ppeared to speak.
PIIBLIC �RING QASED
* Commisaioner F'essler moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward
the request for atree� vacatfon to Cl.ty Council with a recommendation for
approval. Motion carried unanimouely by Commiesionere present.
5.3 PBDBSTRIAN BASEMSNT VACATIOM SaOTB 122 AND 123 MORNING �ILL # 6
Senior Planner Liden reviewed the requ�st for vacation of the pedeetrian
easement and made eta�f�s recommendation for approvaZ.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 20, 1990 pAGg 2 ;
i
r
�
t
0
�
6`? ,
. W
'� `..
pus��c Ts�Tar�anr
o No one a�peared to epeak.
PDBLIC HS�FtIl�1iG GYr058D
* Commiasie�n�r Fe�eler me�ved and Commisefoner Saporta s�conded to forward
the reque�t for vacation af the pedeatrian easement to City Council with a
recommenda�tion for �pproval. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners
preeent.
6. OTHBR BIISINSSS
o. Discuasion �ollowed r�g�rding lettere submitted under Planning Commieeion
communication. The 1ett�rs wer� frAm Rand�ll & Marcia Smythe (Anton Parlc),
Debbie Johneon (Anton Park), Mask and Nancy Irwin (l�rxtan Park), Henry Rane
(Prs�ident�� P�xkway), and Marge Aavenp�rt (Tr3.ad nevelopment).
7. �ou�n�rr - s:aa ��
f �1----''�
Dian� M, Jel ' e�, Secret�.ry
ATT� �
u � �
Milto F`yre, ia es' ent
d j/pcta3-20
PLANNING COMMI3SION MINUTS� - MARCH 20, 1990 PAG� 3
�a �,
PLAI�INING COMMISSION ROLL CALL
�
YiEARING DATL: �� � ST�RTING TIME: ����
COMMISSIONERS
I W DONALD MOEN
� VLASTA BAFtBER
� JAMES �:ASTILE
� JUDY FESSLER
MILT FYRL
AEANE I.�VERETT
hb `� DAVE PE7.'ERSOPI
�'� HARRY SAPOYdT21
STAFF PRESEI3T:
�
� ` �
�.,, m�
�°ti- �' LJV I`}'1
dj/PC-ROLL
, _ �,
/ fh
l � i';
�
`.
i
f
i;
� `- ;,
1°111AES PUBLISMING COMPANI( Legal `
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)664-0360 �OtIC@ �
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Adver#ising ;
i
' • ❑ Tearsheet Notice t
City of Tigard �
PO Box 23397 • ❑ Du I�cate Affidavit '
' Tigard, Or 97223 P �
�
• 0 4:.
�
�'
_.�--- t
�:
AFFIDAVlT OF PUBLiCATI�N _-•-� �
f'
�,
STATE OF OREGON, ) }
COUNTY OF WASNINGTON, )�S' �
�, Judith Koehl�_
being first duly sworn, depose �nd say that 1 am the AdWertisin9 h'
Ti.,�ard Tima� �
Director, or his principal clerk, of the �
a �ewspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 �;.
and i93.020; puClished at Ti�rd in the fi
aforesaid cou�ty a�d sta�te; that the {
P�bl i c Heari na by �'i�rd P1 anni nc; Cc�� � f;
a printed copy of which is he�eto annexed, was published in th� �
entire issue of said newspape�for �n� successive and '
E:
consecutive in 4he following issuss: �
i
i'
Marrn R_ 1A90 � k
l�;
�
� f;l
. , _. ������� �
� ��
Subscribed and sworn t before me this—.$t1L. � �9 _
. � / .�_�-�. !!
t:
- ;I
- Notary PubAic for Oregon
�I
My Commission . iGes,._ , 9/93 ,
- • , - - }�<
� : �.: � ., . .
AFfiDAVIT `- - . °j _ �I
x
�;'ti
� ��I
!::
• �','
�„
�`
�
��
S
`��� � �f�l (�a I�1� �� �� �l� ����,�o �
�J �,
P.O.BO)C 370 PFOON'E f503)68A-0360 U " ������
BEAV�f�'f0�1,C'HEGON 97075
L����q [��Qa�� ��I�n�P���ur��
`� C��y o� T�g�rd � � �"���sh��2 �ot9r.�:
� PO L3o�c 2;i:397 a � q���96ca�4� �PPi�s�viF
"figard;, Or 97223
�a �
�V�I�O�����' �I� (��6��,O��a�"��ffe9
�u�4�� CB�F �6�1�G,�6�, ��� ♦�s������a�a�r�9�a��t��S���b�y t�r,�°�'���al I�➢�as�e���(���r����sn��i ��
��V.D�9�'V �� ��s�Va�Ca�'4�P�9, � ' a ° ,� $ a �4����°���A�a���;6�.P�1'�-'a°���� it��]lIl.
ll��2 s�o�e' �II ����U'�'a��s9a �d:���a p�i�R������l��RU�m����-
d,_J La d i�S� I<t��h��---- ¢u�i�y n���s�n��sfl,7?'�e�a���a���������a�#��¢��°�nD➢����u��2� an
b�u�� ff���4 �a��y svosn��i, d��cas� �nd �� ���� �a�i4�u(t��a�����t��a�gP��'t�e����d�`ai°a����au�e�u}��Il��s9�,
fl3is�i�4oU, �P D�9$ �J9'IP9Cl�8�I CI�B'ai, o��Fr�-- ���ri�a����a�l g��„�i����'t����+'�u���t�t��`s3�s�a��aa���a�A�Qa�a�as�a�
81 6���b"�pffiI�D�EP O$ ��3�9@3ft�1B CfiPC�BI�410P9 ffi° n�;�����,���p�'��g��g�'�y�������'�;��,'����uUsn�a�¢���nff��ae
��d 9�3.a���; �u�9ish�� a2--� ��n¢��a�rr����e�'a�aaa�r�n�1d�a��9��t�o����'�'��a�r.�9a�a�s6���"Il�Q�
�goe���r�1 cm�ney �co� s¢a��, 4��2 3�� �¢ v��a���i � �a�e�m��sa¢ D� a�arr�e� ������� �ru ��Il i���� a� r.�u��
P�k�li�(�����a.,��-1�s3-�ci—�7�7 �yrat��me ff�a���m �ak��dar�ee� ce� '� �s��aat� ����ta t�� ]�H��a�un�og
� �aPi���� cop�y o� v�s�sc�a i� �a����o ffiu�w ����Il'���¢ �1'�fl�� �,41�'e Il��ll� ���r�.,�Ilg2s�b 4�Da����u�7'���0��������n�a�
�e�YaP�e a��a�� �+f �aec� �o�sw�p���d-P��`
con���auCiv� ic�4P�a��@�owue�g i��a���: JP �� ��
fN�h.�9-1�AO _ ,��Jl���1����� ��`�`1�."v��$���3?� �����,/�� f�?��
�,��➢�������.�`�"Il�➢P71�e
_-- `��8�wr��a�a���ff�rr����u����uc�u��'ffaa��a�,a�aa�i��a����P���������a111tv,y
r tr���� e��s���,�a�!���s�r�r�a�a�a��D�����koa������s¢ti��6�9 p�ll�s
`��� ��ea tara�s�ff�a ��r���a��s��r�lt�a�a�t��r�������s�l������
� ��������°r��u°s�a��saa������g���x�a�Il������c�����i���seB-
���S�a�n�� ��wu �� V€�� �,s� �� Qa���g�e�� e� ��a��➢��sa�� e��n� ������f��
�anl��c�o��� ��u�f ��se�U�v 4 ��P�P� �vo�40 ��������&������ �9���a�so A Ira��u�����at�se�����a��r��fi��
2�
�e��y����ao����� 2��a����aa�e�a�+�����a�����e�a��R� �e:����s�_
e���a¢�'aa���n9��Nx���fl���f�n�¢�ax����o
�9,9 3 �.. '�'���.�`�Cd�t���]��°II���� �����o��'�k�.����,�1�� ;
V�I� Coe�o�oa�e�a� o���: fl�o������ °I� t
l�l�I�O�r����" �,u°�c���s¢�e��p���sga��a¢����a�>�'��a A�r�,���2�+iq���e �a���
���������fl�����n W���¢�e.���av����c�r��a�����a��l��¢,d��a�,e
�B�o�t����m�ss���u�rn�D t���e�vu¢��p�p��ll�t�a��&c���+t;�a��a�qa���
¢a��u¢��6e��gs��a����lo
�`fi�,��`�'�A�A�d�h�31F�����`��1 a��.�Q?�5:��1>��1�``�°�°���°�°
��aac�2 R�e�v�€���x��aa ��¢���a�o ��s������s���a�����y ��n-
c���������,��t.��d����t���'���a�b����Q'��a��;�dD�����n"�ae; � .
�e��i����a�+aH9��r����fr����s��.€+�a�.a�r.��s�'A��s�a���ad��i��R�i��
�g6y��a�5p��90
�������������������,���r���r�,��� ��� � �'
������� ' ��t��,���� `
� , :
�:�����;����������►����a����e���a�.�����. ����� �
,���r,b�a�;�e�A������s�a oh���i�c��a"�o,��is���.�"������?u�s's�e� �:
���1�,��v���'�����rm�.!�����r���ra�z��f�ra¢ar���i€y�'�s��u.. -.
��:
i�;�,����:'a�'�9t�3ci�.�dx^�B�� `�`��. . .. � �.'`_
..��„<<,
� i;�
i'.
�°B � �� ������� � [�11��[�� J �,.���o
P.O.BO>C 370 PIiON�(�03)684-0360 ������
BERVCR70N,ORF_GON 97075
�t���Q ����6�� �C�@7�P���OG�O�
� Ci�y of T�gard � L`� ���PS�,eeq E�oAac�
� PO Bo�c 23397 w ❑ puplica4e A44id�vi4
T�gar•d, Or 97223
� °
� r�r�I�S�d�.9'��' �� 6����6���d�G�
� fl4 L� �i"..�+� °
��ao�r� Q� o��coN, )�g. ��s��� � c� �a n�.� :
C��DP�9g01 �� ���4��fiP9C��DGo4. � �,��fra��,t�;�B�����n4��-$�flisa�an�a fl-q,
s(o1k H-2�, �A�idm's 8.&�P. II'dnulr�d ou� �g,
S,__�1���._��1__�4.��3.7_�r--- --- '�'i os+d ?A ��6
No3ae. 6t.ebur�e+ds -- 6
�,109Y0� �lPS4 �UBj/ �FfNOPPl, r���oy� �rad s� �t��f I aru� xh� A�v�rYi�ing �la����9���d�2���t�,an��4���'t
�ir�c4ar, �r his pri�cip�l ci�rlc, o� 4�5��;�.�i°�-1'��`5--- --T�gesc���D Q'�i'erl�4�,�* a�fl3,Shet�
� Pi0�3`d�a�D�1�D�P OY ��3Ptl�P�G �BYC581�460V'I a.� c��fi�o�� ic� C�RS 9��.010 Aa�ow$�.°C�B��axelg--��
in 441� d�sa�.�°e.��ea�a�H lf'�a�^^�+ta�re�. �,
�aeaf ���.0?C+; p�sblish+�� a�4 T1�r2Y'sl-.-- YV9a�e�2�p��� `�
�ffc�����a�l �m���y �ro�l �4�nR�; fE���7fl� �e�� fca�s�aF��e4�6�e�seq�l 43,
�
p��b 1 i c H e a r�_t�-��—Ti��r d F�1�n n�i n a f.nmmass�.t�r�—_ c��,� 5�o n�'�� �J: �$ B
�asf�w 4•s.
ffi �o'iQOR¢�� �agsy aV v�Puoc7a i� V��rdeo ��s�e�c��, v��s P�nl�fish@c9 ira 4h� �'�vmt� ���s��'+t�"�� ��un�
��g��icyo�9,��gaad 49��n� Y
�61�GP0 13�18@ (D1� S�IC.� 9i@ECJ��e'S�d�i POP o�P —s�+ecs��siv� and �,�,S�,l�seys�titi.
co���cutave in 4h� 4o99ov+s'sng i���n�s: ��mgoa�o�dt��llo`Il'������9
'�6ga�d �49D �. �nig9�z 4-13 5-9 fl'�.
Nla r c h 8�.-�-�---- -- — ��r�-��-�d�o�1�o3k�•8�9•8 9,&[�nY.;a 3°�
?.-g 801�a,j�sa.�-5 3R�k 6,�sa�Bg�°�O�D�o
�a�Y�fl i-�0•48�>t�dc�c+t 4d1��-�04�'�r�ava
(y-°L��11&�,ii��s¢er 9�+�8y�3�Ro A,l�teES Q�-��B�
-- - � - , 0.'Co+�la 85-4�fl�•���'�•
�;.�1����' �����_ �°��
�8��.�5� �����° i
aaa��a�PO�a�� �ra� �v�ro�ae 4 ��4or� cvu� aPa6� A,�3•—__h rl�.�!- �11� 1990 ���5 �i���� �
. � ry � _.. . �,. .��., '. �.
�����sa �C��I��y�f"��.6 .���S�u�I��, ;
�4D�l�Yf ��11��7�:��G �P�€�CD6i �SA1Ptl�'�Be�071� �S&�r4a�C'�����°i . �.
���muv�a�u��b�u� a���: J9/93 0e� rC9�a���e l�a�'� �l��r�����
� ' �u�4�a��73 6—A����9�i6�� i��'4 �,
���0�A�0`�
� � ��cro�a 4tiQ8�'� ��
��oa T6�g�e�9a �� ���'�
;s ��°u �aaa'�oe ��a�9;4�a�rti9eD
't'
� � �r�'
����a���r�s������p����� �
�at94��Ar�e�aee��#�������7 u ,
a��o4�u�������
� ��+� +�t����� �
A����S �_ 1 ,
o� �� � , �
���W�40� `' ^ ��c
ry�p��9 1��e ,, .,
NJ.7PW n",P:.c', _' '_'__.r.. _..♦ J�:.;.. .... -.
r
\ .,
T IGARD 1� L � li1N I NG COHMI SS IOB
NOTIC.B: AI�. P&RSUNS U$SIRING 'Ta SPBAR Ol�i AI�7Y ITBK D![TST SIGN THBIR N2lM'B AND NO"1'S 'THSIR
ADDItESS ON THIS SHSBT. (Pl.ease PRII�iT)
AGENDA ITEM: � „�2 � , CASE NUMBER(S) :_
OWNER/APPLICANT: _ ��,�`J3,�C,� � �i ��+��-P�
LOCA�ION:
NPO NUMIBER: C��— D�1TE OE HEARYNG � � C L.� _
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, AADRESS, AND INCLbTUE YOUR ZIP CODE '
'� b
PROPOPTENT (Far the proposal) O1�Pt�P�ENT (Againat th� praposal)
Print Name/Address/Zip & Affiliation Print Name/A.c�dress/Zip & Affiliation
�� �`� 5; �. r� ��P''.n /���� �,7�`
C�.�r1 (-� � )2�����r ff�/�G� �
T I �GA1tD PLAI�Y � I NG COIilII SS ION
NOTICB: ALL PSRSOHS DESIRIPIG Ta SPLAR ON ANY I�Sl� 14iiST SIGN TBEIR N� AND �iO�S TSSIR
ADDRSSS ON T�IS SHSST. (Please PRINT)
AGEI�DH ITEM: � ,p�_ CASE NUMBER(S):_
OWNER/P.PPY.ICANT: -��'pp�� �)(�.� � , 'I
LOCAT ION: CS� 1/V I
NPO NUMBER: �J DATE OF HEARING '_"���_[�'-� V
–.T—
PLEASE PRINT YpLTR NAME, ADDRr.'SS, AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE "
_ �
-
._
PROPOI�iENT (For the praposal) OPPONENT (�gainst the pzapoaal)
..�rr...s�s
Print Name/Address/Zip & Af�ilia�ion Prin� Name/Address/Zip & Af�iliatiaa
�, �
t�. �
'•. 4
T I G A R D P L � N N I N G C O S H I 5 S I O N I�
NAfiICS: A'I.Y. P$RSONS DSSIRING T.O SPBAK ON ANY TTSQI 2i[TST SIGi�i TABIR � AND �O�S THSIR �
ADDRSSS QN THIS SHSR'T. (Please PRYN"C)
AGEND21. YTEM: _ �� � CASE NCJMBER(S): �
OG�INER/APPLICAMiT: � '� r '
LACATION: � � + ��
t T 1 " �./
/
NBO NUMBER: �_ DATE OF HEARIt7G � �
PLEAS� PRINT YC7UR NAME, ADDRESS, AND TNCLUDE YOLTR ZIP CODE `�'
� f
PROPONEI�TT (For the propoeal) OI�PON�NT (Againat ths proposal)
Print Name/Addre�s/Zip & Affiliatian Prit►t Name/Addrese/Zi.p & Affiliatian �
i
i
�
�
�
�
�
a
8
�
;
k
�1
�
Qs
fi
S;
s� .
- � '`�.
� PLANNING cAMkILTNIS3I0Id COMMUNI�TIONS:
1) Letters dated February 19, 1990 from Randall & M�rcaLa Smy�he.
2) Letter dated February 19, 1990 from Debbie JohnBOn.
3) Letter dated �'ebzrxary 28, 1�9A from Mark & P]'ancy Irw�in.
4) z�e��ter dated March 3, 1990 frorat Henry Ran�.
!
(
�
�
U
�
k
�
�!
'•
, y�
}
�',
Z;
�i.
�:
�y
i:
l
��i
I
f'�
�i
�
. � . � . �.� �fi
� . � � � � . . ' S'
. . � . . . . .. .. . . . �.
. . . . . . � � . ,r
. ` ,.
Randall and Marcia Smythe
11185 SW 125th Pl�ace
Tigard, 012 97223 �
639-58�5
February 19, 199tJ
pear City Planning Commfssione .
W� w�r� �reatly encouraged ta see that t�he ci�y council
- respondee� to the needs of the cit�zens of 1"ic�ard who woulc!
hav� been negatively ia►pacted by the praposed ext�nsian of
le ar�l to Pacific Highway. •
urra
IIou er
�1 Y
ler area we have been
�o1d
Although Anton Park is a e�uch sMal ,
in nu�nerous cfty council n+eetings tk�a� changing the city �I
n►aster plan wauld �et a dange�ous precedent, that �ur saf�ty
ar�d the climinishi.ng livea�ility of our neighborhood was nat
the cit
lans . �
� to make
ahan �s to Y p
im ortant �nou �
� �
The members of the Neighborhood Planning Organi�ation are to �
be comm�nded for their hard work and dedication, but it is
time to consider that a mi�take was also made in �1�:`�n �ark,
tim
e
t0 Y'QG
tif it before we have a ,
and ther� is stfll Y
tragedy in our neighbo�hood. •
Please read the enclosed letter to the �ity aauncil . Thep
directed us �e� expl�re and try alternative rneans to acldress
our traffic concerns. The Planning Commissior� �xea�kaers agr�e�d
that street traffic volumes present a signifiaatat problemo
Their memk�e�rs v�tec� thr�ee fom, three ac�ainst, ar�d 1
abstention on the i�sue of closing North �akota Street
temporaril� at a council meeting one year ago.
It is time for City offici�ls to acknowledge and assist the
residents of Anton Park in resolving �hi� problem.
Thank you for your consideration, :
Most sincere�.y,
• � �
�cc�c�--'�, �'?�. p�r111Ntl�r�r
Randall P. Smythe
Marcia L. Smythe FE� 2S ��9�
F � . � . � � � �.� . � .
� . .. . . . . . . ' . . .
�.y . .. . � � .. . .. . ., . ,. �. . ,_
�.. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . v , ,
, . . � � ,�,.,,�._..,�:. .�
,
, .
R;, all and Marcia Smythe
111�� SW l��th Place
Tigard, OR 97�23
63�'-1885
Febr�.iary 19, 199i�
Uear Councilpersan
As eitizens of Anton F'ark , we �re �9ain a5king the city
c�uncil to taE�e acti�n ta prevent a tra9�dy from occurring ir�
o�.ir nei9hborhood. As �,�nu k:r�oMa, tr�ff ic vol�.tnze ha� incre�sed
i.n Anton F'arE: and islands installed on North Uakota Street
have not redu�ed excessive speeds o# the cars commuting to
wnrL; and shortc�itting through our neighborhood. Thp
liveablity of our ar�a has drastieally di.minished, and the
ris4:: to our children, our�elves and aur p�ts is maunti.ng.
Indeed, with the improvements plann�d fnr near�hy 5ummerl�k:e
F'arE: , mnre visifars wil 1 t�l so be thre�tened.
F'eapl� �re speeding thra��gh Gur neighbarhood b�cause th�y are
usin� Narth Ua�:nta 5treet as an e;;tension c�f ScMo1 �s Ferry
Road and E�ea���rtor�'s 1^Cth 5treet t5arrer�to F�oad) , «here
speed i imits are 1 egal 1 y aiid appropriatet y at 4s�> mph, and
where no homes are facing trie street. �lorthi Da4:ota �±�eet
was desi�ned as a minnr collec�or street te� serric? the loc•�i
residents. Near1�,� �,t7c�ri1 people per �ay are commuting throitgh
our are� to save a few f eet and a delay of one stopli9hk �t
5rhp11� Ferry and i�ist Str�et. This i� a dangerous nnd
inapprapriate u;e af Pdorth Ua6•:ot� Street, especially since it
cnntains � sharp , blind eurve at the point where visitars to
Summerl aE::E F'�rb:: frequentl y p�rk: and enter �t a bi��:e path in
Tony Court.
We are �ven mrre concerr�ed th�t rY"c'ttt1C will drasticall;
in�r,easc when the medicai cl ini� at +�he corner ot Ivorth
Liak:ota and 5ch�7 1 s Cerr�;� is compl et�d Hrar_� �eaverton' s i��th
Str,eet (Sorrento Road? is e::±ended to Hall 8��.�levard. The
l��th Street e>;ten�ion to Hal 1 Eso��l evard ia e:,p�cted to carry
traff ic vol umes of �`,���)U cars. My cas�tal �bservation during
commutiny times is that abo��t i/3 of the traffic so�.�tht+ound
on 12�th Street at Sc�olis Ferry �ontinues so�:!th �nto Nor�th
Gak:ota. If only li?'{, of that traffic choosea this r,oute in
the future, we will qain an �dditianal '�,�C��) comm�eters
travelin4 t��rth Uak:at� 5treet at ex�essive and d�ng�ro��a
speeds. I+ my estimate is correct, we c�n e;;pect over 8,���?��
more cars per day upeedir�� thro���h u�tr neiqhbarhood: I
The city council ha� recently se± a very impor±ant pr^e�edPnt
b}l res�onding to the desi�^es of the Tigard community that
woul d have been negati�.�el y impacted by an e;.tension of Murray
F�a�.�l evard through to F'acif ic Highway. Tfie community chase to ��„�
, accept the inconvenience of not having s�tch a ro�tte in favar �'•'��C�"'•"��'
of k:eeping their nei�F�borhond� s�fer and a mare pleasant �'�R u �j �990
, - place to live. The �ity r_ouncil is to be commended fr�,
hearing the desires the comm�inity and respondin9 q,� _k:ty
�nd changing the city master plan. In the same spirit, it
woGit d be eq�ial 1 y appropriate far the city r_ot.�ncil ta respond
to ttie desires of the residents of Anton F'ark.
We were ask:ed last year by the city council to try
alternative means to address our traffic concerns with the
hope of avoidin9 clnsure of North Dakota. We have, in good
faith, tried an alternative salution, and we have 'been
patient and dignified in our dealings with the city of
Tigard. It is time that the city council tak.e steps to
remedy this dangerous situation. It is true that �vp all wi11
have to accept some incanvenience if our streets are to be
safie fnr our r_hildren, b��t this is a small price to pay for
the inevitable loss of a lafe which will occur sGbner th�n
1 ater on Narth Liak:ota Street.
I ASk:: YOU TO ST�F' ON NORTH L�At`:OTA BTREET, TRY TD CF�055 7H�
STREET WHFhJ OUR CHILUfiEPd ARE CRuSSI1�aG TQ THEIR EsUS STOF'S OR
R I L�I NG THE I R F3It::ES TO �UMMERLFif�::E GARk;, ANL� TH I Nt': r�60UT
WHETHER YDU W�ULL� ALI_OW YOUF� CHILLiRE�I TD GRQSS THAT STfiEET Ofi
F;IUE THEIR BIf�:ES TD F'LAY AT THE FAFtf.:!
We have a sug9estion, which could easily and ine;<pensivety be
tried quica:ty. Our goal is to partiat 1 y bl ocE�: Nor±h Uak:ota
Stre�t nr to restrict entry and/or exit from our nei.9hborhood
sa as to stap th� commuters #rom usina our� "shortcut ." �ur
best sugges�tian would ae tc, restrict the tr2tfic flow at
Scholls Ferry and North Li�k:ata by allowing only a ri�3ht turn
e;:it from An±on t='ark: on �lor th Lia4::ata onto Schol 1 s Ferry
eastbound and to allow entry to Anton F'ar4�: only from Scholls
Ferry we�tbound with a 1 eft turn anto North Ii�k:ota. I have
aeen this str�tegy �tsed in North Portland to preserve a
�^esidentia1 neighborhood at the intersection of Willamette
and F'ortl and Bo��l eva.�^ds. Randy ldool ey, haaaever^, pointed out
that the bu�inesses at that intersection might b� seriQ�_��ly
inconv�nienced.
I H =_.econd ���gge�tion woul d be to bl�c4:: sc�u•thbaund tra+f ic on
Nor,th L�ak:ata �t a point south of Springwoad Urive. This
w�uld black: southbound cnmme.►ters coming from 12�th Street and
Scholls Ferrv, and tr-om people es;iting from the medical
center and nther business at the corner of Schalls Ferry and
Narth LiaE.:ota, This woul d el imin�te h�l f of the speeding
commuters ttho=e tr�veling so�.�thbound onlyi .
��� reduce traffic from northbound commuters and "short �
cuttinq," w� could mak:e a right turn only e;<it from the east
�orner of North Uakota and 1:'1st Street, so that commuters
tram Tigard east of i^lst Street, travelin� westbound on
►�lor th Liak:ota are diverted north to Schol 1 s F�rry inste��d of
being al 1 oaaed ta continue on �lorth LiaF::ota into Anton F'ar4;.
�
Commuter5 from Tiga�rd traveling northbound on 121st Street ,
. �, . s - ,,:
are turning lett i�'• Anton F'ark: instead of contin�.ti on �:
l�ist to reach �rhol�rs Ferry. These left turns coul� �e `
prohibited or restricted ta "lo�al traf#ic only." ;
�'
These suggestions do nat inconvenience �eaple wha liv� in our
neighborhood �nd do put the cr�mmuters back: on the ma,Jor
arteri�l streets where they belang. Mast importantly, �k.hey
will maE:e o�ir streets v�stly safer far our children �and the
visitars to Summerl ak:e F'�rE; . It al s� t::eeps the area easil�y
accessable to �mergency vehicles.
It i� not necPSSary �o E:eep our small neighbnrhoad open to
commuter traf#ic. The �kho�.�sands of commuter5 bel ong on the �'
majnr arterial street�, which ar� only nne to twa city� block:s �''
aw�y! Yo�.ir decision ta cancel the extension af M��rray
E�oul evard has major impi i�ation� to thn�t�ands af pec►pl e, yaur
decision to save o��r neiehtaorhond will have far fewer
ramifications.
Thank: yo�� f or yo�cr assi_±ancP.
�:,
:'i
Sin�erely,
i=.
Randall F'. 5mythe
M�rcia L. SmYthe
,;;
�
�';
�`'`;
i
:�
;`!'.I
s,�
:I
;:,.I
l'`'
r::;
i':
K.`>'
4.,;
,:.:
i:r
g�,
�;;,
�:';:'
�;�;
. � � .b4'i�:;
4w,
�?t
� � ES6;
!
. . � , . . . . . �I'
. � � . . � . . � i�
.. . . � � . .. . �5�1
� � .. � � . . . . . .. . . �s:
'�P� ' � � � � . . . . . ..... :., ..... . . . .., . , . .,. �.>. ?�'...�..5�...-:�.�:]Y:�.
,� �ii�EtiiED ILANMINa
a��
� .. �. ��� 2 s �sso
City Planning Gommiss.ion February 19, 1990
Tigard City Hal].
13125 SW Ha�11
Ti�arci, Oregon 97223
De�ar Sirs ,
A s�rious condi�xon exists which ,ieapardizes the safety of our
youth . W� need your help to eliminate this hazard BEFOf�E a
fatality or seriaus inj�ary occurs .
i
The traffic valume on SW North Dakot.a between 5cholls Ferry Road ';
and 121st has exce�ded the numb�rs zoned for . The primary users �
are motoris�.s looking for a shortcut access to 121�t from. the
Beaverton/A1oha area . }
` �
We have been',�orkinc� with the Tiyard pQlice , city engin�ers, ar�d
d t� no
city counc, l,� tp solve this grow.ing problem. To � ,
��.
' effective sol�ta.on has been found . The T.igard poli.ce chief
indicated to us tha�. if our area were continua,lly patrolled
citations would be issued every 5 minutes! ! ! This �faes no� snund '1
lik� a "safe" environment for aur ch.ildren to play . �
.,,.
School age children must catch �.he bus during peak commuter
traffic hours . Mutorists are travellin9 excessive speecfs and are
not watching for chi.ldren as they cross the �treet �o cat�h the
bus . My own daughter was nearly hit by a car orr hsr way to �he
bus s�ap. My heart was 9.n my throat as I watched frpm the house . `�
Now I drive her to the bus stop to ensure hpr saftey .
Zt i� our responsibility to prnvide a safe envirnnment for our
chi,ldren ta I.ive dnd p,1ay so they grow into responsibl.e cita.zens . `'
We a�so mus� demanatrate that the community lzstens and cares I
about their concerns .
l`he citizens of Washington County made a commitment to th�
development of our youth by supporting tfie bond measure for
Summer Lake Park . 'i"his provides an putlet for our children to ;':
play . To further aur sUpport , we have to make sure �,hat th� �;�
routes they take provide safe passage . The current traff,ic
levels DO N07 . };
This situation wi11 worsen as work besins widening Scholls �erry `'`
Road . Motov�ists will look for tame savers .
MY family moved to the Antan Pa�-k subdivi�ian from Portland 3 1/2 .'1
years ago , prior to North pakota being a thru street . Originally �
the eomprehensive plan did not call for Narth qakota ta be a thru '
street . Some h�ow it got changed . What we want �5 for the �ii
orig.inal p],�an to be restared . r::`
t
,;
�
i�:
y`
�,,
�
o.�, __ .
�
�
�
� �� , 4
. ` � � G,
4,
s
i
page 2
W� need your support in favor of street cYosure. Our yc�ut,h cry
c�ut for you support . I know that when all �he facts are revi�wed
you will agree that it is the only salutior�e G
�;
5incerely,
;;.
�;
��,��� � ,�.. f.
f
�1
Debbie 7ohnsvn �'i
11100 5W Torry Court t�
R,,
1`igard, Or�gon y7223 ;;
r:
�'
' i;;
s',
i:.
G:
i''
I",
4'�
1'
ir
E;
�;
Fc
�•'
i:::
l;':
i'.
�'`
Y,_
;,
k
4;':
!'.
t�i
�;
,
�
Februdx�y 28, 1590
MrF R�ndall R. W�o1ey
Tigard City Hall
P. 0. f3�x 23397
Tigar.d, OR 97223
Dear Mc. i�aolay:
We were vory di.sheart�ned upon reading gour atatus c�poc�, le•ttor datod Februarp 13
regarding S.W. North Dalcp•L•a S'�,I'qet.
The pz�oposed "im�rovements" •to 121st Avenue will only compound the traff.ic �,rt�blem�� we �rc
experierGCii�g in our AnL-on Par)t noighhoch�od. Thc� in:�tallai:,ian o:f a f.la�hing wacning
beacnn on 121st a#: North Dakoi.� inclicates tn driv�rs tha1: this is a maj�c titreet! It is
no�L a majoc stceet. T�t is only a minor rpllectorr a neighborhood street. We do not wan�t
to givo a falso impression ho any mace commutecs who are lookiny for shortcuts off of {,he !
designatad major c�ad� in our ac�eaF
The though�t of a p�ssible fuL�ize traffic signal a{; this in�l,ersaction at a cos�, of $7.00,0(3U
of our tax dollars is o��en moro upshi:�il7g�
Th� fac•t isr commutcrs got arounc3 finP � few year:, ago b�foce Nor�th Dakota Str�et was put
��hrough to conn�ct wi�th Scholls F��ry Ro�d. Ci�.y pJ.anners have sai.d in ret�ospcct th�t
t.h:is was a bad id��a, But, it was done and now trie "blessirig° of living in a new
devel.o�ment with a nice wide, smoot•hly-paved s�rec� has �t�arn�d in•to a curs�. The tra�fa.c
cantrol measur�s tried to date have not improved the volume n�e spe�d of the traffic,
which worsons mnn{:hly. Zt„�houldn't bc scarp to get your maii or tak� your chil.dren faP° �
�traller ride, A change must be made nnw bef.nre a death or serious injurp results>
We wiil con�inue to suppor�, a •t�mparary closure of Nnrt:h Daknta Str��t in order to ��tturn
our n�ighborhood ta a sa�e p1ac� to live ancl raise our children. We urc�e you to lceep an
open mind at i:ha upcomiiig hearings, liston �to our conac�r.ns as if �L-hey w�re your own ai�d da
all in your. �owEr to keep ou� stree�s free fcom abus�:cs of our neighborhooc�. �
;�
Sinc9raly,
YV I r�-�-�- a.�.,�< Yl a-�-.--�ti�.,-,-�-,.
Marli and Nancy Icwin
11135 S.W. 1�5th Placo
Ta.gardr OR 97223
q_r,:J�rry Eciward�. MaYor 'l
Ran Goadpa��tor, Polico Chir�f
Val�ri� Jahnsonr Citg Council Moml�or
Joe Ca:tenr Ci�ty Cnuncil M�mber AEICElVEDPlE:C�S',Pd� �
Car�lyn Eadori, Ca.ty Gounci.l M�nik�er
Jatin 5�:hwar�tz, Ci�ty Council Memk�er MAR 01 '�gp
C'at Rc�illey, City 1�dministra�tar
City.;Pl��n�i:n,g Cammi,.s�•i�a�
Jno Schw�i�L•z, Transgarta�.iorl Advisorp Commif:'tEa ''�
Jim Boylan, Nei.ghbor.hadd PJ.anniny Organizatiqn �:�
`i'hm Hriazl, S��ai:� Repre��n��a�ta.vE
j;,;i
;:::;
�'i.
�.a}-, :
�.
a.�
� MENRY KANE
� A'TTORNEY AT LAW
122%S S.W.2Nb
P.O. BOX 518 AREA COOE 503
BtAVERTON.OREGON 97075 TELEPHONE G4E•O�SOB
FAX 644-9574
March 3, 1990
Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor,
and Councilors
City of Ti.Qard
Tigard City Hall
PO �ox 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: March 5, 1990 public hearing on urban renewal proposal
to finance "Presidents Parkway" development
Dear Niayor Edwards and Councilors:
This letter is written .in my capacity as a Washingtan County
taxpayer who will pay more property taxes if Ci�.y of Tigard
taxpayers adopt the abcave-identified urban renewal propasal .
The reason is that so-called tax increment finanring is dou�le
taxation. New taxable property under the plan is taxed, but the
new taxable value .is not av*ailable to Washington County and
other county-wide taxing boc�ies. That means the County, etc.
must raise propezty tax rates to make ug for th� lost tax base.
Therefore, property taxpayers outside the proposed Tigard urban
renewal plan area subsidize the development.
I To state the obvi�us, fche land in questian would develop and
! increase the area's property tax base if the plan were rejected.
Perhaps the developer will explain the reasan, if any, prop�rty
taxpayers outside Tigard should subsidize improvements the
de�reloper could obtain and finance through a local improvement
district.
The newspaper articles on the issue appear silent on wh�ther the
TiQard urban renewal agency will use the power of condemnation
to acquire privately-owned homes and businesses for the benefit
of the favored developer.
Persons and businesses whose property is condemned rarely, if
ever, are fully compensated for the loss of their homes, property
and businesses, And some businesses are put of business permanently.
And the residence that replaces the one lost through condeznnation
usually costs more than the price the urban renewal agency paid
for the lost h.ome.
RECEIVED
MAR Q � �990
COMMUPIlTY DEVELQPMENT
,
`�, . .
�.
J i
f
Tigard Mayor and Councilors
March 3, 199Q
Page �,vo �
The Tigard City Council should inform Tigard voters, taxpayers and j
proper�y owners whether the plan calls for exercise of the power of
eminent domain or condemnation - the legal authority to take
private property on payment of compensation.
The Tigard City Council also should inform Tigard voters of the {
reason, if any, the property cannot b� assembled for development (
without urban renewal and without the taxpayer paying the cost '
�of the improvements that wi.11 make the property more valuable.
The Tigard Ci�y Council also should inform Tigard voters o� the !
extent of commitment, if any, and the extent of financial resources
to start and then c;omplete the groject the developer will invest. j
The Tigar�d City Council also should ir�form Tigard voters of the I
facts, if any, on which the proponents believe the property '
�
camplies with ORS chapter 457, relating to urban renewal : !
d
(1) which arts if an " "? �
p , y, are ORS 457 .010 (1) Blighted areas �
(2) which affected bui.ldings, if any, are ORS 457 .010 (1) (a) �
"unfit or unsafe to occupy" for living, commercial, industrial a
or other purposes? ° ".
,
;.
(3) which buildings or structures are of ORS 457 . 010 (1) (A)
"Defective desxgn and quality of physical construction?" ;I
�
;
(4) which buildings and structures are of �RS 457 . 010 (1) (B) �
"Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing?" `
�
t
(5} which parts, if any, evidence ORS 457 .010 (1) (C) "Overcrowding r
and a high density of popuJ.ation?" w
;
(6) which buildings, structures and geagraphic areas, if any, �
have ORS 457 . 010 (1} (D) "Tnadequate provision for venti.lation, '
light, sanitation, open spaces and recreation facilities?" �:
�
(7) which buildings, structures and geographic areas, if any, f:
, evidence ORS 457 .010 (1) (E) "Obsolesence, cleterioration, y�
dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses?" }
�:
(8) which geographic areas, if any, evidence ORS 457 .010 (1) (b) �
"economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of pr.operty �'
resulting from faulty planning?° �'
�.
(9) which geographic areas, if any, evidence �ORS 457 .010 (1) (c) �-
"division or sut�division and sale of property or lots of �'
irregular form and shape and inadequate size or dimensions �;
for property usefulnes� and development?"
�
;
' � .
� Tigard. Mayor and Councilors
March 3, 1990
Page Three
(10) which geographic areas, if any, evi.dence ORS 457 .010 (1) (d) �
"laying out of property or lots in disregard af contours,
drainage and other physical characteristics of the terrain
and surrc�unding conditions?"
(il) which geographic areas, if any, evidence aRS 457 . 010 (1) (e?
"exi.stence of inadequa�e streets and other rights-of-way,
open spaces and utilities?"
(1�) which geographic areas, if any evidence ORS 457 . 010 (1) (f)
"existence of property or. l�ts or oth�r areas which are
subject to inundation by water?°'
(13) which geographic areas, if any, evidence OR� 457 .010 (1) (g)
"prevalence af depr�ciated values, impaired investments
and social and eGOnnmic malajustments tca such an extent
that the capacity to pay taxes is reduced and tax rec�ipts
are inadequate far the co�t of public services rendered?"
(14) which geographic areas, if any, evidence ORS 457 . 010 (1) (h)
"growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas,
resulting in a stagnant and unproduativ� condition of land
potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the
public health, safety and welfare?"
(15) which geographic areas, if any, evidence ORS 457 . 010 (1) (i)
"loss of population and reduc�ian of proper utilizatior�
of the area, resulting in its further de�.erioration and
added co�ts to the taxpayer far the creation of new public
facilities and servic�s elsewhere?" I
If the voters approve the proposed plan and the matter is �
challenged in couri:, will the �ity of Tigard be able to present
evidence to suppart any claim that the geographic area is ;
"blighted?° �
1
The Tigard City Council is aware af the sad experience of the E
nearby City of Sherwood, which must levy a property tax to pay ?
for defaulted Bancroft ].and improvement bonds. The improvements i
cost more than the land value, developers did not develop the ;
land, and Sherwood is making up the differenceo Expensive:
The �igard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers� of the
"safety" procedures of the plan, if any, designed to avoid
sadd�ing Tigard taxpa�ers if tlhe developer defaults.
The Tigard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers of the
first year, this �entury or the next, that the anticipated new
urban renewal property tax base will be subject to taxation by
affected public bodies.
i
I
,
.
' �. .
Tigard Mayor and Councilors
March 3� 1990
Page Four
The Tigard City Gauncil is aware of the sad experience of the
nearby City of Tualatin and its collapsed urban renewal plan,
which never developed.
I recommend that the Tigard City Council �ravel in th�e nea'r future through ;
the urban renewal area adjacent to Emanuel I�ospital in Northeast
Portland. Hundreds of blacks and others lost their homes in the
name of "urban renewal" to benefit expansion of Emanuel Hospital .
Much of the land acquired by Gondemnatiox� or sale far urban ren�wal
is parking lot or empty:
Emanuel Hospital, of course, d.id not use the acquired land except i
for parking lots, tr� my knowledge. I stand to be eorrected.
The Tigard City Council should explain to Tigard voters the
"advantages, " if any, of the proposed urban renewal plan and
development.
Will the de�velo ment mean lower property taxes? I doubt it, based
P
on the urban renewal experience of �he City of Portland, which
has orae af the highest property tax rates in Oregon. The per
$1 , 000 tax ra�e levied by the City of Portland for municipal
services is, if my memory is correct, between $7 and $8 per $1,000
assessed valuation:
The '!'iqard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers of the
dollar amount of the deposit, if any, the developer proposes to
pay the City of Tigard to guarantee that it will develop 100� of
its plan.
The Tigard City Council should i.nform Tigard taxpayers if any
of the developer's properties have been fareclosed, and if so,
the dollar value of the foreclosed property and foreclosure reasons.
The Tigard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers of (a)
the numbe.r of acres and location of the geographic areas included
in the urban renewal plan, anci (2) how much of the total urban
renewal district would be developed by the developex.
The Tigard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers of the �
estimated cast of (1) land acguisition, (2) utility, road and
other improv�ments, (3) fees to consultants, (9) fees to attorneys, �_
and (5) all other estimated aosts by c�tegory or classification. �
o f �;
The Tigard City Council should inform Tigard taxpayers/the "firmness" �'
or reliability of the c�st estimates. This Beaverton resident "
since 1973 knows that the City and its urban renewal agency estimated �
costs at $10 million. The last time I looked it was about $35 million. €?
And that doesn' t count intexest. �
�
,,
Ci
��
s:.
i.;
` � ..
' Tigard Mayor and Councilars
March 3 , 1990
Page Five
And mast, if not all, of theccurredPwithoutucurbantrenewal.M���r
5hopping center would have a
The March 2, 1990 Ore onian artiale titled "Tigard council ta
wrestle with Presider►ts Parkway plan°` report5:
"The developers sa� th� project must move
forward naw or n�ever
* * * , * * *
* * *
�� * * * But David B1akE of Trammel Crow said �:j
that delay might be d.eadly to his propasal .
" ' I don' t think it' s possible to delay it, °
Blake said. ' I �hink the cauncil either needs
to do it now or wait an entire �ear to the next
�qay, My qut feeling is, they need to do it
now, or it may never happen. ' " ;�
The late Wi11 Rogers is 5�pp�1ed bu�.hdoesnat�increased�.heeamount
increasing the number. of peop ,
of land. What is th� need for "instant" decision? 4
If the land is to develop, it wi11 do so, with or withaut Trammel i
�
Crow.
The Tigard City Council should identify whi�h, if any, geographic ;
area in the proposed urban renewal district is owned by or under ;
optian held by Trammel Crow, and if there are options, wheri each
optian expires.
The Tigard City Council should identify by at least street address
and owner of record each residence and other property that would
be acquired to implement the propo�ed urban renewal plan.
Finally, the Tigard City Council should explain tlle reasan, if any,
for giving what appears to be an exclusive contract to Tras�unel Cxow
instead of calling for bids and p�ri po��l�eloCrowlhastlobbied, wined ,
developers, plus the extent, if y,
and dined or paid travel expenses in whole or in part to the mayor
and councilors and officials °a membersyaffthegTigardnPlanningbut
not limitec� to the chairznan an
Commission and the Tigard community involvement directo .
Ve t �
e a �cc: Ci izen Participation Organization 4 �
ighborhood Planning Organization 8
iqard Planning Commission/'City Administrator
media
, _
1 , ; "
II
�I
� .
�;, '<_y AGENDA ITEM 5_1
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGiDN
TO: Membere of •the Planning Commisefon ,I
FROMa John Acker, Aseociate Planner
DATE: Marah 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Item 5.1, Periodic Review
Periodically, the City of Tigard i� required to review it� comprehen�iv� plan
I
an la
d nd uee regulations in vi�w of cYaanges that have occurred eince
acknowledg�ement. For periodic review, our comprehensiwe plan is reviewed
ag�in�t fnur periodic review factora: 1) There has been a euba�sntial change
in circum�tances upon which compr�ehenaive plan or ].and uae amendments were !j
baaed so that they no longer aomply with th�e goala; 2) Acknowledged provisions ;
of the aom�rehen�ive plan or land use regul.ations do not comply with goale ''I
because of goale or rulea eubsequently adopt�d; 3) The comprehensive pl.an ar �
land uae r�gulatione are inconsistent with a etate agency pl�n or program
relating to lanfl ue� that was nnt in effect at the time of acknnwledc,�nerat; 4)
The City ha� not performed addi.tioaal planning that wa� agreed up�n at the time
of acknowledgement.
'Pigard received its periodic review notice in May of 1989. The City requested
and wae gsanged an ex�en�ion of its proposed order eubmittal date until April I
30, 1990. In April the Ci�y will eubmit a propo�ed order to the Departm�nt af
T,and Con�ervation and Development (DLCD). The propased or@er conai�te n£
findings addressing the four periodic revi�w factore and a dea�ription of any I
neces8ary plan and land use regulation amendments.
At thie time, the Planning Commiesion is requeeted to make a r,ecomnaendatfon to
the City Council tca forward the proposed perioctic review order to DLCD ae the�
City�e respanse to the periodic revi�w notice. The City Council will conduct a
hearing c�n the proposed order on April 9. A fin�l City Council hearinq will be
held to adapt the final periodic review nxder anc� neceeaary amendmsnta on
' August 27. Dsriny the p�riod between the propoeed order aubmittal and the
final hearing the Gity will finalize appropriate amendments. Alao, DLCD and
other int�rested organizatione and individuala can submit commente which will
be taken into conaideration in the final periodi.c review order. The Auguet
hearing will be for the adoption of the findings and al1 related compreheneive �'
plan amendments and CommL3nity Development Code changee. ;;;
Th� proposed periodic review order and attachment� ie enclosed The following is
a summary of thoae areas identified in the finding�a as recXuixinq aoma ahange.
s
FACTOR ONE
� i;
i':
Change in Circumetances �;.
r,
UnanticipatQd Events - The City will addrees impacta of the EPA ree;uirements �;.
i":
,:
N�'
�?
,,.
�_ �i
!sw _ _.�;
e .
to regulate water quality in the Tualatin Rivar and the effeats of large
scale annexations. These ieaues will not requfre changes to the plan or
regulations.
Cumulative �ffects - There have been no significant cumulativ� effects
identified.
Unfulfilled Plan Policies - There has been no policy w�ich hae not bee�
carri�d out.
New Information - New inventory information has been incorporated where
neces�ary in apprapriate aections.
New or Revi.aed Statutes - There are several new atatutea that require
chang�s: wet�an� definitian, hearing natice grocedures for mobile home
par�s, orit�ria gnd atandard� in effect at the �ime of an applicatian shall
be used, etandarda �nd definition regard�ng Reaidential Homese Facaily Day
Care Pravidere, Residential Care Facilities need to �e reviaed, mobile home
definition, and eolar access.
FACTOA TW'O
New �r Amended Goal or Rulee Adopted Since Acknowledgement
Goal 5 Open Spac�s/Natural Reaources - Although the City waa acknowledg�d
und�sr the preeent a�oal, it ia generally recognized that the City's wetland
inventory ia defiaient. The Ci.ty has conducted a �horough w�tland inven.�ory
and a�seesment. Ba�ed ugon the inventary work the City wi7.1 need to reviee
some of ite regixlato�y standsrda.
Goal 9 C�mmercial and Induc�trial Ecanonnic Development Rule - Thia new rul�
requires the �ity to oonduct an exterasive economic develogment analysie and
aeaess the eupply of land relative to d�evelopment potential. There will be
some revieione necesaitated by thi.ao
Goal 11 Public Facilities Plan - This rule rec;�uires that the City d�velop a
plan for the following public facilities: water, sanitary sewer, atorm aewer
and tran�portation. The public facilitiea ahould accommodate the projected
growth. There will be change t�aeed on this plan.
FACTOR THREE i
,
Consfstenay with state agency plans
There are several atate agency plane that have been identified as applying to
this section. The Department of Tranapartation Six-Year Improvement Program
requiree eome changes that will be incorporated inta the Facilitiee Plan.
EACTOR FOUR
Additional planning taska r�quired at the time of acknowledg�ment but not
done - Thia factor doee not apply to Ti�gmrd.
� - . .� ..�:,:..,
;�* _ -_. . .. _.�..__ ��.. _ _ _. ._:, _... . __ ..��__..
,;
�.
CITY dF T'IG!!RD
PItOPOSSD PBRIdDIC RSVIBii OR13Sdt
INTRODUCTION
The State of Ozegon, undar ORS 197.640, requiree the Cit�r of Tic�ard to review
its Comprehensive Plan and land use regulatiana periodically an�l make changes
neaessary to keep the plan and regulatian� in complfance with statewide
planning c�oala and coordinated with plans and �xograms of state agenciee. To
accomplieh ti�is, Tigard muet �dopt £inciinge in tha torap of a loc�l revfew order
that responde to four periodic revfew fa�tore. Thi� pxopoaed local ,review order
pr�videg findinga and recommends amendmente to the City of Tigardl's
Comprehensive Plan and Comm�anity Development �ade in order to satisfy the
periodic review requiremente of ORS 197.f40 aneicJAR 660, Division 19, "Periodic
Review",
BACICGROUND TNFQRASI�TION
The City of Ti.gard Camprehensive Plan and Communi.ty Dev�elopir►�nt C�de were
adopted by Ordinance 83-52 on November 9, 1483. Th� Plan an� Code were
aubsequently aaknowledged by tk�e Land Conservation and Development Gnramission
(LCDC) as beina in oompliance with statewide planning gaals on Octobar 11, �
1984.
{
Tigard's comprehensiv�a Plan and �ommunity Development Code aan be open for
amendment twice yearly in April and Oc�ober. �ince aclknowledgement, the City
has adopted seweral amendments. Al1 adop�ed plan and aode amendmente have been
submitted to the Department of Land Cons�rvation and Develnpment as requir�d ��
under OAR 660-18-04n and the City assumea that all amendments are in compYiance �
with statewide planning goals.
Tine City of Tigard began ite periodic review upon receipt of the Peri,odic
Review Notice on May 4, 1989. In October, 1989, the City requested an exteneion
to the periodic review proposed �rder aubmittal date. DLCD granted an extension
to April 30, 199�.
Tnitial public meetinga dzecussing periodic revi�w were held with Neighborhood
Planning Organizations on May 17, 1989, June 7, 1989, June 12, 1989 and Jurae
14, 1989. A workshop with the Tigard City Council and the Planning Commisaion '��
was held on February 19, 1990. Other meetinge are scheduled with �the Planning
Commiesion and the City Council in the future.
There are four factore under OAR 660-19-055 whic;h must be addreseed in th�
periodic review of Tigard�s Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code.
DLCD hae identified seveY�al questians under the ��ctors whiah must be addre�eed '
at a minimum. The City•s findings and conclusions on those factora are ae
followe. "�
;�
1 =+
;;;
i'
i,'
!",
f'::
��:.
3rt
��
P`�� ,..�. .: .,._e.. .«...�_�
,
iI
I
':
Ili
FACPOR OI�S
SIIBSTAFITIAL GHAN�S aN CYRCOl9STANCB3
There has been a substantial chang� in circumstanc�s, including, but not
limited to, the canditions, findinga, or sesumptions upon which the
comprehensive plan or land use r�egulati.ana w�xe based �a that the
comprehensive plan or land use regul.ations do not comply with the goals.
To determine whether the subetanti.al change in ciraumetances faator dnes or
doee nat apply, the City of Tiga�d's review must contain findinge on the
following subfactors.
Ao IInanticipated D�eelop�ents or Bv�ents
Major developmente or ev�nte wk►ich have occurred that the acknowledg�d
plan did not assume or antioi.pate or major deveZopments or events which
have not occurred that the acknowledged plan did assume or antieipate.
Local periodic review findi.ngs muat describe any occurrences euch as:
the construction of or deciaion not to build a large project like a
major reservoir, a regional ehopping center, a major energy or
tranaportation facility; a �ignificant change in the ].ocal government's
natural resaurce ar economic base; significant unexpected population
growth; significant aonsecutive decline in population growth rate;
failure or inabilit� io prnvicie public facilities and services in
accordance with the plan, �tc.
DLCD has identified �wo iteme whi�h must be addressed under this ca�eg4ry as
�
followe.
1. E�raluate the impacta on Tigard'a ahort-term and long-term
development opportunities from the EPA/DEQ requiremente to clean
up the Tualatin River.
Findincte
In Deaember of 1986, the Northweet Environmental Defenee Center
filed a guit in the Federal Dietrict Court af Oreqon against the
Adminietrator of the Environmental. Protection Agency (EPA) to
require him to ensure that Total Maximum Daily Loade of water
quality limiting pollutants be eatablished for the lower
Tualatin River ae required by Section 303 of the 1972 Clean Water
Act. The EPA hae designated the Oregon Department af
Environmental Quality (DEQ) as the agency to i.mplement water
quality stand�rde on the lower Tualatin River.
a
4.
�
The DEg has determined that ammonia and phosphorus are water
quality limiting pollutant�s in the lawer Tualatin River. Theee
pollutants manifeet themeelves aa low oxygen and excessive algae
growth respectively.
The primary source of excess ammonia in the Tualatin River is the
Unifi�d S�werae�� Agency's (USA) Rock Creek sewage �reatment
�acility. The USA is constructing addition�l facilities that will
reduce the problem in 1989.
Sources of phosphorus are the USA°s eewage treatment F�.cili.ties
and atormwater runoff �rom both uxban and rura�. areas.
The tatal maximum da.ily loads for theee two pollutanta have been
d�tsrmined by th� UEQ. 2he amounts of allowabl� dis�harge will be
d�vided among tlxe group� �hat contribute to the occurrence of
these substancee in the Tualatin River, includix�g the City of
Tigard, the USA, Waehington Countp, and agriaultural interest�.
The City adopted interim standards for ianproving water quality
as o�tlined by DEQ on N�ovember 6, 19�9 (Ordinance 89-27) . The
interim etandarda were adopted to require on-ai�e practices for
i.mpraving the q�xali.ty o� etoxmwater runoff. Theae standaxds wi11
re�nain in effec�t �t leae� until a lang texm plan is devel.nped and
adopted.
The City is currently cooperatir�g with USA to prepa�e a plan to
meet the loadi.ng atandards for phosphorue in the lower Tualatin
ltiver. Tha.s plan will be submitted on behal£ of USA, Washington
Caunty, and all Cities of Washington Coun�y that are in the
Tualatin baein. Addit�.ordal water treatment facilitiea, effluent i
diacharge practices, out af basin transgorts and i.mproved ��
development practices in regard to atormwater runoff are all ;
being conaidered.
Conclueion
At this time neither the extent nor types af water treatment ''
facilities and/or practices needed to bring water standards into
compliance have been determined. Since projects that will be
built in the ahort term aze already in the planning stage the ;;
3.mpact will be ineignificant if any. However, in �he long term, ,''�
the cost of development will likely increase in the Tualatin
River basin, or in the extreme case, development could be ;i
curtailed caueing eome impact on development in Tigard.
Any increase in dev�lopment c�sts attributable to higher water
quality etar�darde will b� common for all within the Tualatin ;
River B�sin, which includee most of Waehington County. Impacts on
development will depend on the e�conomics of amount of increased
fi
, i
i;
3 1'
!,':
x:
�,?
�e.
�'
��
- _ �
�.
c�
development costs in the Tualatin Basin due to water quality practices
verees the desirabilitp of the lacation. Therefore, the long t�rm
development impacte, if an�r, cannot be determined at thia ti.m� and no
revisions ta comprehensive pLan pc�lici.ea or development standard� are
necessary.
2, Evaluate the i.mpacts on the lar►d ue� plan and implementing meaeures
from the large-eaale annexations, including Washington Square, north
o� the city.
Findinas
There have been i:wo Aa�ge-scale annexatione in�o Tigard aincs the
original acknowledgement of tT�e Comprehensive Plan. The
annexation of 385 acrea known as the South Metzg�r ('LCA 20-86)
� was completed in 1987. The 215 acre Northeast Metzger annexation
(ZCA 8?-Oa) was compl�ted in early 1988.
Ae shc�wn in the Ilrban Services Report �or the Metzger area
{exhibit 1) , ThQ City of Tigard ie able to provide an adequate
level of urban serv�ces to thie area withaut adversely affecting
ths level of service provid�d to the exieting incorparated area.
T2xe resid�ntial gortion of the annexe@ area ia largely developed.
The aomm�r�ial portion of the anne�ed area ie aleo highly
developed with anrne notable exceptione in the area of Wa�hington
Square. Since annexation, there has been major commercial
develupment at Lincoln Centex and Washington Cirele, immediately
noxth of Washington Squaxe. The�e develo�m�nts occuzred in area�
�hat had been planned and zon�d for thie type of use prior �to
annexation. For the d�velaped areas, the level af servic� has not
been diminiehed and the newly developeci areas have been eupplied
wi�h full urban service�.
With the exaeptian of two parcele, the annexed areas were within
Tigard's Area of Yntereet and were planned for eventual inclusion
within Tigard. Tigard ie recognized in iche compreheneive plan ae
"the logical provider arad/or coordinating agency of urban 1eve1
pubiic servicee and facilities for all lande within the Tigard
Urban Planninq Area". Propertiee in the emall area that was not �
in Tigard's Ar�a af Int�rest make a logical boundary and were
included at the owne�s request. Theae propertiee have had no i
subetantial effect on the plan or implementing measures.
�
The annexatione in Metzger included potential Goal 5 resources that
were identified by Wash�.ngton County at acknowledgement as needing
further analysiso The Washington County Cultural Resource Inv�nta�ry
includsd the Jenkine House and the Steele Mercantile Store which are
within the area annexed to Tigard. The City will include thia
analysie as part of the periodic review proceas.
4
�` i..
Conclueion
The large-acale annexatians were of largely develop�d property
ancl were anticipated far inclusion in Tigard by the Urban
Planning Area a£ ilgreement with Washington County. Therefor�,
�here are no substantial impacts on Tigard's land use plan and
implementing mea�urea and no revisions to �ompr�hensive plan
policies or c�evelopment standards ars necessary.
B. Cumnlaa�ive Sff�cts
ulative eftects resultin from lan and lax�d use regulation
Cum P
5
amendments and implementation actiona on the acknowledged plan's
factual ba�e, map de�ignati�sne, and policies which �elate to atatewide
gaal requirements.
�'indinaa
Th� City of Tigard has condu�ted a thoraugh review csf plan and code
amendmente eince acknowledgement. 'Ther� have been a number amendmenta
during that time (exhibit 2) . All. arnendments were qranted in
compliance raith the acknawledged comprehensive plan and reviewed by
DLCA to be in confarmance with atate�wide planning goals.
Conclu�ion
B�cauee all amendmenta to the comprehens�ve plan, were granted ix�
accordanae with the comprehengive plan and state-wide planning qoala
there are no cumulative affeata on. the plan's faatual base, mag
designatior�s, and policies r�latinq ta gtatewide goal requiremer►ts,
therefore, no further amendments are necegeary.
C. IInfulfilled Plan Policie�
Oversigtat or a ciecieion by the local government ��o delay or not carry aut
plan policies which relate to a statewide goal requirement. Local periodic
review findinge must deecxibe why, for example, policies in the plan
requiring a citizen involvement p�ogram evaluation, a revised inventory of
natural hazards, or a date-epecific, nverall revision of the plan, etc.,
have noti been oompleted.
;
Fi.ndinae
i
i
The City has conducted a thorough review of ita polfciee that relate �
to etatewide goal recjuiremente and hae determined that there are na
policiea that have be�n delayed or not carried out. ,
5
i�
Cnnclueion
�
Because ther� are no policies that have been delayed or not carried il
out, this factor does not a�ply to the City of T.igard.
D. I�ew Infcsrmation I
I
Incorporati.on into the plan af new inventQry material which relates to
a statewide goal made available to the juri�diction after
ackn�wledgement. Local perfodic review findings muet liat what
applicable publ.ishgd s�tate ar federal reporte have been made available
to the 3cxrisdiction after acknowl�dqement containing new iny�ntory
material, for example, can gr.ound water availability, air quali�,y, big
game k�abitat, census information, soil eurveye, natural hazarda,
etc.,and deecribe what steps, including any amendmenta �o the plan's
factual base, policiee, m�ap designations and land u�e r�gulationa, have
been t�aken in respons� to this information.
Inv�entoriee from several state agencies were identified by th� DLCD in
Tigard's periodic review notice. No other relevant inventory information is
luxown to �e available. The City hae obtsined ared reviewed all l�sted
inventories and finds that this infor�mation applies to the plar� as follows:
Findinga
Orevon Y3epartment of Trans�ortation
Fdi.ghway inventary updates: The eix-year Highway Improvement prog�am,
1989 - 199�, dated August 1988 hae been reviewed by the City, A�.l
agpliaable information trom this inventor,y ie cpntained in the Public
Faciliti�a Plan� The new inventory informa�ion wi11 be incorporated
into the comprehensive plan by the adoption of the fac�lities plan
(GOAL il).
Department of Environmental 4ualitl,►
1. Annual Air Quality Reports - 1988
Tigard is part of the Portland-Vancouver Air Quality Maintenar�c;e
Area (AQMA). Ae euch, the City remains in a nonattainre►en� area
for carbon monoxide and ozone. There has, however, been
improvement in theee two areas over the past few years. The
Portland-Vancouver AQMA has �xperienced li�tle change in th�
level of particulate emie�iona over the past several years.
2. Hazardous and Solid Waste Report
The management of solid waste ie a regional issue and as euch
Tigard'a aompreheneive plan contains policfes that recognize and
support METRO�e authoritl► and responsibility to prepare and
implement a eolid waste management plan.
6
"�. .
The three franchiaed waete haulers operating within Tigard
provide cur.b-side pickup of eorted recyclable matexial ae
required bd etate 1aw.
There aze no known ha�ardous waete sites located within the City
of Tigard.
3. Senaitive Aquifer Map
According to the S�neitive Ac,{uifer Map, portiona of Tigard
overlsy a aensitive aquifer. Most of Tigard i.s aerved by sanitary
sewers and, with limi�ed exceptions, new developments are
required to cnnnect to a eanitary sewer. Tigard is supplied with
water by the Tigard Water Dietrict and the Metzger Water
Diatriet. Neither of the water die�ri�ts serving Tigard extract
water from the aquifer underlying th� City. Storm drainage
facilities �re required of any new develogm�r�ts and are in place
thraughout moet ot Tigard. Therefore, the City does not use water
trom thie aquifer nor knowinglgv contribute to the degradation of
this aquifer.
4. Water Qualxty Status I�sQeaement Report (1988)
As� noted above, most af Tigard ia served by sanitary �ewer and
all new dev�lopmente must connect to �ewer. With the exception nf
USA'e Durh�m Treatment facility which is rec�ulated by �Eg, there
are no knawn point sourcea of water pollutants.
Nan-paint pollutan�e are addreseed as part of the drainage g�lan
in the Public Facilities Plan. The plan addresae� the new water
�
quality standarda in the Tualatin River basin.
Economic Develoxrment Devartment
The Oregon Economic Developm,�nt Department has developed information on
etate and national trenda through the Oregon Economic Trenda Project,
1387-1988. This informatxon was analyzed and pertinant portione were
used in the City�s economic analyeie under the Goal 9 requir�mment.
Information from the oregon Economic Trends Project will lae
incorporated into the compreheneive plan throuqh the adoption of
changes autlined for GOAL 9.
Portland State Universiter
The po,pulation in the City of Tigard is estimated to be 25,510 ae of
July 1, 1988 according to the Portland State Univexsity, Center for
Population Research and Ceneue. The current population figure w�L]L1 be
7
,
��.< . _....._
k:
i
� `�
i.ncorporated in the updated plan at varinue placee. This population ie
not signif.icantly different than the approximately 25,000 that wae
forecaeted in the Camprehenaive Plan in 1983 (VOl I figure IV-3). The
City finds that there i8 no resson to ��vise the projectione at this
time. Alao, einae Tigard is gen�rally growi�g at a rate that was
anticipated, no new gaal.e, policies, or regulati.nns are proposed.
Conclueion
With inclueion of the Public Facili�ies Plan, amendments from the Goal
9 economic analysa.a, and current pnpulation figures, the comprehensive
plan°e factual baee will be updated. Because population farecast
eatimates are cloee to the actual 1988 population, it is not necessary
to amend comprehenaive plan goals or policiee.
E. Ne�w or I�evised Statutee
coneistency of the plan and land use regulatione with new or am�nded
etatutee adopted aince acknowl�dgement. Local periodic review findings
mu�t addreea newr e��katutee adopted gince initial aaknowledgem�nt and
�xplain haw the plan and land uee �equlation� contir�ue to mee� the
statutory requiremgnts.
ORS 197.295 - 197.313 -- Needed Fiousina
ORS 197.303 �tates that "needed housing" also means: "(a) Houaing that
i.ncludee but ie not limited to, attached and det�ch�d single-fam3ly
housing and multiple famil� housinq for both owner arnd rente� occupancy
and manufactured homes; and (b� Govexnment assist�d hous�ny."
FindinQa and Conalu�inn
The City'e comprehensive plan provides for needed housing as defined
above in its comprehenaive plan as acknowledged in 1984. Single fan►ily y
attached and manufactured homea axe allowed outright in all residential �
zones. Single family attaahe3 homee axe allowed autright in th� R-7, R- €
12, R-25, and R-40 zones and as a conditional use in the R-4.5 zone. ¢
Multi-family houaing is allow�d in the R-12, R-25 and R-4Q zonee. �;
Therefore, Tigard is in compliance with thie etatute. };
5,
�:
ORS 197.295 (41 -- Mobile Home Park Definition }'
A mobile home park is a lot, tract, or parcel with four or more spacea �'
6!
for rent withi,n 500 feet of one anoth�r. f�
��
Findin�re and Conalus,ion � (��
*
Tiyard'e Community Development Code defines a mobile home park in �
accordane:e with the above definition (18.26.030 page 27) therefore th� j
City ie in compliance with this etatute. �,'
;
�i
8 � ��;
i�
� � �. �. . �i�'s:i�:
�:
� �F',
.. � . . . � . .. �,
� � . . . � � � ' . ��
� . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . � . . . � . . �: '
��":� � � � � � ..... . _;.,,"_. _ ...��. .. ........ . .:..�.
ORS 197.480 - 197.490 -- Mobile Home Parks
ORS 197.480 requires �ha.t e�ch city and county prueide for mobile home
parks as an allowed use an buildable lands within urban growth
boundariea. Sufficien•c land must be zaned for a density of 6 to 12
unite per acre t� accommodate need. Need must inclu�e coneideration of �
exiating park� which may be dieplaced becaus� they are located on
industrial,commercial, or high denaity residQnL-ial land. Criteria and
standards far the placement and d�siqn of mabile home park� muat be
clear and objec�ive. A public hearing m�y be required £or approval of a
mobile home paxk.
Findinas and Conclusion
The City has addreosed the need for mobile home parks and has provided
for mobile ham� parke to �e permitted outright in th� Ci•ty's medium
density residen�ial zones � R-7 and R-12) and also in medium-high and
high density zonee (R-25 and R-40) �
The City has considered existing parks in commercial and indus�rial I
zonea in that they are al�owed as non-aonforming uses and can remain so
as long as the conditfone of Chapter 18.132 are met. Also, mobile homes ;
located in nonconforming park� can be replaced by mobile homes that
meet safety atand�rde se required in Chapter 18.94.
ORS 197.485 statee that a juri�dictinn may not prnhi�it placement �f a
mobile home, due eolely �a its age, in a mobil� home park in a �arie
with a d�nsity af � to 12 unite per acre. Reasonable safety and
inspection requirements may be eetablished for units which do not
conform to the National Manufaatured Iiom� Conetruction and Safety
Standards Act r�f 1974.
The City has e�tablished cl�ear and objective standards for mobile hom�
parks and doee not prohibi� glacement of a mobile home eolely becauae
of age (Community Development Code Chaptex 18.94.030)
QRS 157.490 statea that a mobile home park may not be established an
' land within an urban growth boundary which ie planned or zonec3 for
commercial or induetrial use. If no other access is available, accese
may be approved through a commercial or industrial zone.
The City hae addreesed the iseue of incompatibility of mobile home
parks and commercial and iYiduetrial uses by not permitting mobile home
park development within the City's aommercial and industrial zones
(COmmunity Development Code Chapters 18.6Q through 18.72) .
Therefore, the City is in complfance with rnobile home parks requir�cnente ae
defined by ORS 197.480 to 197.490
OR5 197.732 - Goal Excevtions
ORS 197.732 revised requiremente for taking an exception ta the goals.
Theae amended exception requirements have besn incorporated into Goal 2
and thc� Goal 2 rule (OAR 660-04-000)
9
" � .
Y
�; Findinae and Conclusion
�
;; The City of Tigar�l has not taken and will not be taking any exaeptians
to statewide plannix�g goale. Therefore, no revieions to the plan or
land use xegulations ar� neceaaary.
i
13 ORS 197.752 - Lands Available Eor Urban Develonment
I" ORS 197.752 (1) states that lands within urban growth boundaries shall
� be available for urban development conaurrent with the proviaion of l�ey
+ urban facilities and e�xvices in accordance with locally adopted
development etandarda.
s
' ORS 197.752 (2) states that, notwithetanding ORS 197.752 (1), lands not
�,
� need�d for urban uses during the �lanning period mag be deeignated for
agricultuz�, fnxestry of other nonurban uaes.
�, Findinqs and Cc�nclusion
' All l�nds within the Tigard City Limits ao well as that within Tigard's
� Urban Planning Area have bsen deaignated fox urban land uaea.
� Therefore, The City crf Tigard ia in aomp.liance with �hi� statute.
pRS 197.767 - Wetland Definitic�n
An area af privats].y ow�aed land which other�aiae eatiafies the '
defin3.tion of a we�land ia not defirsed ag a wetland if it waa created
by human activit� �fter the date af a juriediction's acknowledgement as �
�
part of an agproved development project. Thi� exclueion does not apply E
� to rnitigation areae.
j ;;
Findinas and Conclusion �
1
Tigard's comprehensive plan does no� pree�ntly defi.ne wetlands in 1;
� �onformance with OR� 197.767. The City wrill amend ite Community
� D�velopment Code sectian 18.26, Definitione, bo bring Tigard into
compliance. The amendment definea we�lands can�iatent with the �
` Comprehenaive P1an definition of wetland contained in the Federal
� Manual for ldentifvinQ and delin�atina Juriedictional Wetlande. +
�
f �#
� U�aon adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments the City
� will satisfy thi,s req�irement. � �'�
t:
i;
ORS 227.175 - Application Fees, Conaolidation Frocedurea, etc.
f;
��
, ORS 227.175 (1) requires that a city "ehall establieh feee 4»
! charged for procesaing permite at an amount no more than the ;�
'I� actual or average coet of pro�vic�ing that service." �;
t,
���� � �,
10 �
�
�
w
,`,;
,,.,� . .�..:.... ._ .
�°�. _ _ _ _._
�.
Findinas and Conclusion
The City of Tigard has adopted a fee achedule that is baaed the
actual coet for praceeeing (exhibit 3). The�efore, the C3.ty af
Tiqard is in compliance with thie atatute.
ORS 197.175 (2) requires that a city eatabliah a cansolidated
proredure by which an applicant may apply at one time for all
permita ar zone changea needed for a development project. Ths
proaeriure ie eubject to the 120-day time limit set out in O1tS �,
227.178. '
Findinae and Concluaian
Tigard�� Community Developmen� Code s�ction 18.32.100 eatablishes
a proceee for conaolidating permite far related actione an a
eingle deve].opment. Therefore, the City is in compliance with
thie statute.
ORS 197.175 (3)-f4� requi�e�s �t 1eae� one public h�arirxg;
approval baeed on aompliance with the comprehex�eive pl�n;
pxovision� for notice to the applicant and other intereeted
partiea; notice to mobile home park tenante at leaet 20 but no
mor� tlaan 4A daya before a hearing on a propase�i zane change for
the mobile hame park they reside within; and �ppraval ox deni.al
of an application for a permit without a hear�ng if natice and
app�al proviefona are provided to those paraose who would have
had a right to notice if � hearing had been scheduled or who are
adv�rsely m�'fected by the decision.
Findinas and Conclusion
i�lthough the �ity now notifies p��tiee 20 elaye grfor �a any zone �
chan�e, this has not been incorporat�d into the Community
Development Code ae yet. Th� C�.ty will am�nd th� Community
Development Code to meet this reguirement. Therefore, when �the
City adopts appropriate amendment the �equireinenta of thia
etatute will be met.
ORS 227.175 (5) -- Local Appeal Procedures (also OR� 197.762)
Appeal procedures must reguire the applicant or app�±llant to raiae any
ieaue before the governing body with eufficient apecificity to allow an
apportunity to respond to and resolve each isaue. Certain items of
information must be included in the notice for. a land uae hearing. At
the hearing, a etatement of applicable criteria muat be made and that
teetimony muet addrees theae criteria.
il
. _ ._ ,.._ _. . _ _. :
� ------= - - - _ —-- - _ _ __
��,, � .
Findinae and Concluaion
City of Tigard appeal procedures as identified in the Community
Development Code Chaptsr 18.32.110 comply with the requirements
stated abov�. Th�refare, the City concludea that it ie in compl�ance
wit� ORS �27.175 (5).
ORS 227.175 (61 -- Public Use Airport�
Notice o� a public hearing on a zone u�e permit in the vici.nity of an
airport must be provided to the oav-n�r� of the airgort.
i�indinqs and Conclusion
There are no public use airports within or near the jurisdiction of the
City nf Tigard. Therefore the City cancludea that thie atatute doee not
aPPlY•
OFCS 227.178 -- Final P►.ation on Permi.t or Zone Change Applic�tions within
120 days
ORS 227.178 (1) requires a city to take final aotion. on �
peranit or zone change application, including a11 �ppeals,
within 120 days nf com;ple+�i�n of the application.
Findinae and Conclusion
' Tigard'e Community Development Code, Sectio� 18.32.030,
requiree final action an percnit and zon� change
applicati.one within 120 daye. Thprefore, ttae City
cancludes that it fe in compliance with OFtS �27.178(1).
ORS 227.178 (2) epecifies prc�cedur�e for dealing with
incomplete. applicationa.
Findinas and Conclusian
Section 18.32.050 outlinea proceelures for degling with
incomplete applications in accordance with ORS 227.178
(2) . The City therefore concludee that it ie in
cnmpliance with thie etatute.
ORS 227.178 (3) requiree the City ta review an
application against the standarda and ariteria
effective at the time the application was submitted
providing that • the initial application wa� or
completion was accompZished in a timely manner.
12
� `�,.
gy
F'indinas and Conclusion
Tigard�s Community Development Code doaa not
explicitly atate the requirementa atated abave. The
City will amend i�e development code to meet the
atatutory r�equirements. Therefore, v�hen aanendments are
adap�ed, the City will be in compliance w3.th thia
�tatute.
ORS 227 178 (4). allowe the applicant �o reque�t an
@xteneion beyond the 120-day limit.
Findincts and Con�lueion
� Section 18.32.030 allowa an app].icant �o requeet an
extension to the 120-day limit. Therefore, the Cii:y
conclucles that it i� in complianae with ORS 22?.178
(4� e
aRS 22�,1�g (g) agpli�s th� 120-day li.mit only ta
decisio�e wholly within th�e control of the ci�y.
Findinas and Conclusion
Section 18.32.030 applies the 120-day limit only to
deaieion� wholly within the cantrol of the city.
Therefore, the City concludes that i� ie in compliance
with ORS 227.178 (5) .
ORS 227 178 (� exempte thase plan and land uee
regul�tion amendments or adoptiana of new regula�tions
that muet be submitted to the DLCD Direator under OR5
197.610(1) from the 120-day time limit.
Findinas and Conclueinn
Section 18.32.030 satiefies the requirement og �R�
227.178 (6). Therefore, the City aoncludes that it ie
in aompliance with thie atatute.
ORS 227.178 (71 provides for an applicant whoge
application hae na� been acted nn finally �rithin 120
days after th� application was initiated to eeek a writ
' of mandamue to compel ieeuance of the permit or zone
' change or a determination that approval would vialate
I the city'e plan or la�ad use r�gulatione.
;,
�
�
�
k�
� � ��%.
� � � � �
;;:
13 � � � �;�
�,s
�:
�a,'
' +�
�,>
�.
� '�. .
Findinae and Conalueion
ORS 227.178 (7) provides an applicant a means ta compel
aation on a land uee application after I,20 days. The
City of Tigard's comprehensive plan and implementing
ordinancee do nat in: any way infringe ugon that right.
The City therefor� concludee that tlxe requirement� of
thie statute are eatiefied.
OR3 227.180 -- Revisw af Action on Permf.t Anplication
ORS 227.180 !1) (a,1(A1 establishes that the period €or '.
decieion shall not be le�e thgn
.i
fili.n an a al nf a ,
9 PPe
eeven days af�er the governing bady mails or del,ivers
the deci.eion of a he�aringe officer.
Findinas and Ca�nclusion
3�ction 18.32.31a o£ Tigard's Community Developm�nt
Code sets the appe�l period to be 10 daya for �the
decision of a hearings o£fice�. Therefare, the City �
aancludea that it is in compliance with ORS 227.180
(�) (a) (�)•
OR3 227.180 (1) (a) {$� and�,C1 require that a hearing on
th� appeal be hel.d and that the record of the hearinge
officer'� action be can�idered.
Findinae and Concluainn
Section 1�.32.320 of Tigard�s Community Development
Code outlines hearing pracedures in. conformanc� with '
ORS 227.1�Q (1) (a) (B) and (C). Therefore the City �
concludes th�t it is in conformance with this �tatute. �
a
OR5 227.180 (1) (b1 not withetanding (1) (a), a c�tg
counc�l may establish that a hearing� afficer'e �
decision is the final decision of the city. i
Findinas and Conclueion
i
S�ction 18.32.370 of Tigard�s Community Development �
Code atatea that an appeal approval autk�ority shall `'
affirm, reverae or m!�dify a decieion. Therefore a
hearings officer decision may be appealed and the City
conclude� that ORS 227.180 (1){b) doee nat apply.
;
14
_ :_. . ::.__._.. .__:_ � �:.. ,,. . . •:..:. - �-.,
"�;; __
i;
�
ORS 227.180 (1) (c1 requires that fees for filing an
appeal shall be no more than the average cost of auch
appeale or the actual cost of the appeal, excluding the
caat of pzeparation of a written transcript. (1) (c)
also requirea that feea for preparation of wri�ten
tranecripts not exceed the actual cost of �reparing the
tranecript, up to $500. plus one-half of the actual
coet over $5d0.
Findinas and Canclusion
The City baaea the appeal fee upon the aatual cost of
the appeal. Section 1�.32.330 also set� transcript
Goeta in accordance with ORS 227.180 (1) (c). The City
therefore aoncludes that the rec�uirements of thie
statute are satisfied.
oRS 227.180 (21 allows an aggrieved party in a
proceeding for a xon� change nr discretionary p�rmit
to appeal the decision to LUBA.
Findinas__and Conclueion
Th� right to app��l a deciaion to LUBA is allowed by
s�ate statute and ia nat un.der the City'a juriadic�ion. �
It is ther�fore not necessary for the �ity to addrese
thie etatu�te. The City concludes that O1tS 227.180 (2)
is eatisfied.
ORS 227.180 (3) eta��s ttaa,t ex parte contacte with a
member of the decisian m�king bod�r ehall nnt i.nvalidate i
a final c�ecieion or action of the decision making body, �
provided that the member receiving the contact plac:es
the aubetance o£ trle content� of the ex parte
, communication in the recard of the hearing and makea a ;
public announcement di the right of partieB to rebut
the content at the first hearing where action wi.11 be
conai.dered or taken.
Findinas and Conclusion �
Section 18.3�.170 of the Community Development Code
outlines ex parte communicationa in accordance with
OR� 227.180 (3). Therefore the City concludee that it
complies with this atatute.
ORS 284.010-060 -- Reaional Eccanomic Develoument Act
�
This sat relates to tha "Oregon Comebaak". The Governor �nay adopt �
propoaed regional etrategie�. Loaal plana and Iand us� reyexlatione need
to be conaistent with the regi.onal etrat�gies. Local governmente need �
to review the liet of actione to implement acdoptecd regiona2 etrategies. j
15
�"r' ---
_ , ._. , ..
Findinqs and Concluaion
The regional atra�egy of the eight caunty area which encompasses Tigard
ia tauriam with a focus on the Oregon Convention Center. The City has
reviewed the Oreqon Tourism Alliance ReQinnal Strateaies P1an 1988 and
ite comprehensive plan. The City cancludes that aSthouqh �romotion of
touriam is not an economic development strategy for Tigard, the plan is
not in any way inconsistent with the atrategy. Therefore, the Cxty
concludes that no additiana or amendments are necessary.
ORS 418.817 -- Familv Day Care Providers
Section 12 oP HB 2884 provides that a day care provide� which
accommodatee fewer than 13 children in the pravider•s home is
conaidered to be a residential us�. Such a home is a permitted uee in
�11 residential and cammercial zones. Conditiona must be no more
re$trictive than those imposed on other reeidential dwellings in the
eame zane. Zoning proviaions contrary to this law may not be �dopted or
enforced.
ORS 443.590 - 443.600 (1) -- Reeidential Homes
ORS 443.590 s:na�ts a atatewide policy stating that "physi.cally or
mentally handicapped persons are entitled to live as normally as
poesible within communities and ahould not be excluded from cammunities
because their disability requires �hem ta live in groupa." ORS 4�3.600
(1) provides that a "residential home shall be considered a reeidential
u�e of property for zotling purpoaea, including areas zoned for aingle-
family dwellings. No city or county ahall enact or enforc� zoning
or.dinances prohibiting the use af a residential dwelling, �ocated in an
area zoned for residential or commercial use, a� a residential home.
, ORS 443.62A - 443.630 -- Reaidential Care Facilities
HB 2936 provides tha� residential care facilities (for mentally handicapped
persons) muat be allowed as a conditional use in residQntial zones
permitting densities of 8 or more units per acre. Zoning ordinances or
aiting criteria which would preclude such siting ahall not be enacted or
enforced. Cities wi.th a population lese than 2,500 are exempted.
Findinas and Conclusion
Family Day Care Providers, Reeidentia'1 Homes, and R�eidential Care
Facilities are not adequately defined nor are the atandard� explicitly
in conformance with the statutes. The City wi].1 amend its Community
Development Code se�etion 18.26 Definitions and eectiona 18.44 through
18.58 Reaidential Zone Standarda ae necessary to meet the statutory
requirements for these three types of faciliti.es. Therefore, upon
adoption of theae amendmenta, the City will be in compliance with theae
atatutee.
16
�
m
. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .._. .. . . . "�:'I
. . � F.,
� •
ORS 446.003 (17) (a)-(c) -- Mobile Hnme Definitians
ORS 446 hae been �mended to define mobile txomes aa: (1) reaidential
trailers constructed before January 1, 1962; (2) mabile house�
constructed between January 1, 1962 anc� June 15, 1976 which naet Oregnn
construc�ion requirements then in effec�; ancl (3D manufactured hamea
canetructed to federal etandarda.
Findinas and Conc�lusion
The City daee not presently define mobile homea as required by ORS 446.0�3
(17) (a)-(c). The City will amend i�� mobile hnme definition to conform �
with the atatutary d�finition. Therefnre, upon adop�ion of an amended
mobile hnme definition, the City wi.11 be in �ompliance with t�is sta�ut�.
� ;;:i
F'. Otlser Iasues
Idothing in subsections (1) (a)-(e) of this ru�.e is meant to limit or
prevent any peraon from raising other ieeues or objectians invalving
the eubatantial change in circumstanceo factor set forth in subsection j
(2) (a) of this rule ae la�ng as such concerns are aubmitted con�ietent
with the requiremente of QI�Ft 660-19-065.
Th� following iseues wer� identifi�d by DLCD.
�Iational Flood Insurance Proaram - Moet Oregon co�launities were
notified by the Federal Emergency Management Ar�ency (FEMA) in
Septembex 1986 that recent changes in fedr�ral regulationg governing the
Idational Flnod Ynsu�ancg Program (NFIP) would necessitate revieions in
local ordinances that were adopt�d tn eatablish eligibility in the
NFIP. The 1oca1 re�►iew order should addrese theee revicaiona as a
subatantial change in circumstanaes affecting the city and report �;'
whether the FEMA regulatione have been complied witla. ::
�i
Findinas and Concluaion ;:
,
Tigard received a notiEicatian from FEMA in September, 19�6 regarding
changea in NFIP regulatione. Ordinance 87-32 was ndopted by th� Tigar�l �:,
City Council which ameraded Chapter 18.94 of the Cornmunity Development �!
Cade and brought City floodplain regulationa inta compl.iance with NFIP
regulations. Beaause the City has adapted required changes, Tigard ie X,',
now in aompliance with P'EMP�'s regulations governing the NP'IP. We '
therefore conclude that P'EMA'e requirement that NFIP regulatione be k
complied with hae been a�tisfied. 4;,
;
,
� ;�.
�;
R�
,,
t;•
i;�
17 �`�
,.
�'
�'�
Department of Enerav - The City'e plan contains policies to incr�as�
opportunities for energy conservation and alternative aourcea of energy
and to review the feaeibility of implementin� a eolar accesa ordinance
(Policies 901.1 and 9.1.3; s�pported by statements in the regource
document at pp. 1-275 to 278) . Also, by Resolution No. 85-23 the City :
agreed to "participate in �nd aupport efforte.. .�u secure funding to
undertake a joint project to provide and protect solar acce�s ta the
extent feasible given local conditiona." This project has concluded
with preparation and broad acceptance of model ordinanaea deaigned to
encourage and pratect eolar access. Theee model azdinances represent a
sub�tantial change in circumstances pertaining to energy conservatian
an� use of alternative �ources of energy. As a result, the city mu�t
�ubmit these ordinances to public review and formally consider them for
adoption and incluaion in the city's comprehensive plan implementing
ord�nances.
�indinae and Con�luaion
Tn 1987 the �ity considered adoption of a solar acces� ordinance. However,
the ordinance wae never considered in a public hearing forum.
The City will review a solar accees ordinance which is based on the
model ordinance. This ordinance will be considered at a public hearing
in conjunction with periodic review. Therefore, when the public hearing
is conducted the City will be in compliance wi�h this requirement.
FACTOR TWO
NBW OR !�Sl�D$D GOAL3 OR RIIL88 ADOPTSD SINCB TAS DATS OF AC�IAWLBDGBMBNT
"Previouely acknowledged provisians of the comprehensive plan or land use
regu].ationa do not comply with the gc�als becauee of goals eubeequently adopted
or etatewide land use polici.es adopted ae rules interpreting goals under ORS
I 197.040."
Goal 2 - Land Use Plannina, Goal 2 Land Use Plannina Rule (OAR 660 Division 41
Findinae and Conclueion
Tigard�s compreheneive plan and land use regulations do not contain any
exceptione �or cite etandard,e for exceptions under Goa1 2, OAR 660, Divieion 4,
or ORS 197.732. The City is not propoeing any new or amended goal exceptions at
this time. Because there are no conflicting atandard� in the plan or
regulations or pxoposed amendments to them, the City therefore concludee that
the requirements of the amended Goal 2, the Goal 2 rule and ORS 197.732 do not
require changes to the City�e plan or regulations.
18
tt.'.
I
l;,
{;•
i;iy
�4.,
��i
�,
�, �
�oa1 5 Open 3pacea/Natural Resaurcee Rule� (OAR 661�, Division 16f
Fi�ndinae and Conclusion
The City of Tigard�e Comprehenafve Plan was acknowledged in 1984 subaequent to
ths adopt�an of thie atatute which was implemented i.n 1981. Therefore, the Ci.ty
c�f Tigard has already been acknowledged �s in compliance with this Goal.
Hawever, the City recognizes that the wet�land inventory portion c�f the qo�►1 was
inadequate arad eo hae condiacted a thorough inventoxy and ae�esament of wetland
areae (attachm�nt A). As a result of the wetland� inventory aad assesgment,
the City wiLl amend the wetland portion of its c4mprehensive plan.
Goal 9 Commercial and Economic Develo ent Rule (OAR 660, Div��inn 9)
Findina� and Conclueion
The Ci�y hae conduc�ed an economic analyeie of the Tigard pl�nning area. Thie
anslysis (attaahment 8) �s the baeis for needed amendments. Comprehenaive plan
amencLaaente� relat�d t�a the economic analysie wf.11 fulfill the goal 9 �
requiremente, therefore the City will be in campliance when theae amendments `i
are adop�ed. i
;
�
a
�
,
Gaal 10 Metronolitan Housina Rule (OAR 660, Division 71, �
Firadi.n4a and Gonclusion �
;
�
The City of Tigard hae conducted a survey af ite compreheneive plan and '!
amendmente e�nGe acknow:laclgement relatiee to the Metropolitara Houeing Rule. The �
�ity has det�rmined that it maint�ins the r�aquired houeing de,ns.ity oppo�tuni.ty ,�
of 10 unit� per aare. Therefore, the Ci�ty concludes tk�at it xemaina in f
compliance with thie xule. `�
�
�
Goal 10 -- Houainq Ru1e (OAR 660. Division 8) �
�
ti
Findina� and Concluaion �,
.'�
Th� City of Tigard'e comprehensive plan wae acknowledged in 1984 eubaequent to �
th� adopti.on of this rule which wae implemented i.n 1982. Th� City therefore f
concludea that it hae already been acknowledqed as in compliance with this rnle �
and no changes �re neceeeary. ,�
�
�
� ���a
, �
'�
�� � ",'1
.l
:i
,
',
19 1
f�.. ��o. ,
Goal 11 -- Public Facilities Rule (OAR 660, Divisicsn ll)
Findinas and Conclueion
The City of Tigard hae conducted a eurvey of pertinent da�a relevant to �he
provision of �anitary aewer, etorm eewer, water and transpartbiion. The reault
of thie etudy ia the public facilities plan. (attachment o). When the City
adopte thia plan as an attachmeat to the comprehensive plan and ad�pts
approprfate amendmente to the comprehensive plan it will be in cc�m�iliance with
this goa1.
F�t'1�OR THI�B
Thie factor requ3rss that Tigard review the comprehenaive plan and land use
regulation� to obtairt eonsiatency �aith mandated Stat� Agency Pl�rts and
Programe related ta land use eahich were not in effect when the Ci.ty�s plan was
acknowledqed.
DLCD has reviewed the following programe and determined tknat they potentially
meet the atandarde contained in ORS 197.640 (3) (c) and OAR 660-19-055 (2) (�c)
(e.g., the prugrams ia mandated by etate statute or federal law; is coneistent
raith th� goals; and hae objectivea that cannot be aohieved in a maz�ner
coneistent wi�h the comprehensive plan or land use regulatione).
1. Departmeat of Environmental guality
Loc�l gavernments mua�. maintain an up-to-date inver�tary of major air,
water, aolid waste, and nafae pollution sourcea and sites (cahere au,ch
information ie made available to the jurisdiction)
AIR
FTNDINGS
The City of Tigard has reviewed ite planning area for
sourc�s and sitea of major air pollution. No additional ';,
sourcee of major air pollution have been locat�d within #
thie area aince Tigard'e acknowledgement. 1
s
Tigard'e comprehensive plan contains policies which r
require compliance with state requirements for air
quality and requires coordination with DEQ and Metro, �
f
�
i
i
20 I,
�
I
�. . ;
�
CONCLU5ION
The City has aurveyed ita planning area for major �
sources of air pollution and has not found any
; additional locations. Therefore, the City corc�ludee
that it is consietent with DEQ's air pollution
� inventory goals.
WATER
FIIdDINGS
1 The City hae conducted a review af ite planning araa for eourcea
of water pollution. The Unified Sew�rage Agency operatea ita
Durham Sewage Treatment �lant within Tigard•s �uriadiction. This
facility•s effluent outfall into the Tualatin River ia regulated
under a EPA discharge permit administered by the AEQ. Tigard can be
coneidered a� non-point source of phoapinorus and aontributes to the
exceedance of the total maxi.mum daily lo�d af phospk�orus in the
Tualatin Aiver. The phosphorua loacii.ng occurs as stormwater
runoff. The City is participating with USA to develop a plan for
bringing the Tualatin River into compliance.
No other major �ources of water pollution were id�ntified.
Tigard'e compreheneive plan containe policies which
require complianae with applicable f�deral, atate �nd
regional requiremente for water quality.
CONCLUSION
The City hae conducted a aurvey of ita planning area
and hae found no additional major sourcee of w�ter
pol.lution. Therefore, Tigard concludea that it ie
� consistent with DEQ major water pollution aource
inventory goals.
SOLID WASTE
FINDINGS
The City haa reviewed ita eituation relative to ealid
waste and hae found that there are no existing ox new
aourcee of solid waete pollution within the City.
Aleo, the quantity of solid waete q�nerated within the
City ie diminished becauae of recycling. The three
City franchiaed waste haulera provide the opportunity
to recycle by picking up sorted material a minimum of
once per month at the curbeide.
21
�5.
CONCLU�IAN I
The City has suxveyed ite planning area and hae found �
no additional major sources of solid waete pallution.
Tigard therefore concludea that it is in complian�e
with DEQ major solid waste source inventory goal�.
PTOI SE
I
, FINDINGS �
The City of Tigard has reviewed its situation relative
to noiae pollution and found that there ax�e ao sourcee
of noise pollution within Tigard. On Janu�ry 22, 1990,
the City adopted a r�vieed noise ordinance (ORD 90-03) .
The new ordinance is consistent with DEQ noise
requlations.
CONCI,US ION
The City hae surveyed ite planning area and hae
� discove�red no additional eources of major noise
pollu�ion.
�
2. Department of Tranaportation
Local governmente muat amend Goal il elements to inventory proposed
highway improvemente and adopt a policy to coordinate with ODOT in
impZementing ite Highway Improvement Program. '
P'INDINGS
The Ci.ty has reviewed the ODOT Six-Year Impravement Program and ha�
identified highway improvemente in or near Tigard. These projects are
diecuesed in the Goal �1, Publi.c Facility Plan.
The City has a poliay to cooperate with otk�er federal, state, regional
and local jurisdictione for the efficient planning and management of
the traneportation sy�tem.
CONCLUSION
The City of Ti.gard has developed a public facilitiee plan. Upon
adc�ption of the public facilities plan, the City's comprehenaive plan
will be consieten� with ODOT's Six-Year Improvement Program.
�;
i
2 2 ;'`�'
4
�.
�:;
lr
��
�`:
i
�.. •`
FlICTQR I+'aIIR
Additional planning taeke required at the ti.me �f acknowl�edgement or agreed to
in receipt af etate funaa.
FINDINGS
The Department of Land Conservation and Developm�nt etated that thie factor
does not apply to the city of Tigard in the periodic review notice. The
a t a reemente and
City has reviewed ite acknowledgement documents and gr n g
has found no additional planni.ng taeks that were required at the time of
acknawledgsment or agreed to in receipt ot atate grant funde.
CONCI,US IONS
Therefure, the City con�ura with. the DLCD in that thie factar doe� not
apply to the City of Tigard.
OVERALL CONCLUSION
The City of Tigard hag con�lucted a thorough revisw of its Comprehenaive Plan
and Community Development Code in response to: changee in the cammunfty;
amended or newly adopted statewieie planning goals, Orec�on Adminiatrative Rule�,
and Or�gon Reviaed Statutea; new or revis�d state agenGy glans, programe, and
inventories; prior obligations of the Cfty to complete planning tasks.
P'inding� presented in this Periodic Raview Oreler contain the City's responsee
to the periodi� review factor� and outline pxopoeed plan and development code
amendments whf.ch, when adopted, wi.il bring �he p1An and development ordinance
with all applicable requirements li�ted in �he DLCD periodic review notice of
May 3, 1989. Adoption of the plan and developnent ordinance amendmenta and
final review order will complete Tigard�s periodic review reaponaibilities
required by ORS 197.640 and OAR 660, Division 19.
23
<: ,
. _ _
i
... _ ..-.;, ._ . . . .. . .. . _ ......... ..........__...__.._...._......... .. .. ... _. ��N�A�1' 1 . ... ____ i,
`.. �_ .� `,
. �; . �
,. ..
�� �� _,
` ._ � MUN�CIPAL SERVICES STUOY - ' � � 4?
' _ �1ETZGER/WASHTNGTON SQUARE :
TABL.E OF OONTEM'S
�:
Chapter 1 — 8a�ckqround `'
'i
1.1 Study Area ��
1,2 An�exation Process a�d Legal Requirements _ r,,
1.3 Special Districts �'
l,q Metzger P�rk �.IO •
1,�, Oemographics and Papulatian
j^I'
1.6 Washi�gton Cou�t�/City of Tigar�d ,
Expenditures Survey
;
1,7 Tax Rates
Chap�er 2'Resources �1
;,,,
2,1 Vacant Buildable Lart�ds i'`
2,2 Revenue Estimates
2,3 Estimated Revena�e Flaw . a",
Chapter 3 = 4utlay Requi.rementis� `
s'
,;,
� 3.1 Capital Needs Assessment �'
3,2 �ervice •Delivery
�
Ghapter 4 — Appendix � �
. 4.1 �xpeaYditures � � �
q,2 Rev�nues � . .
4.3 Methodology ' . � `'
4.4 �P$ i .
- q,� �8�ibliograpfiy .
. . :"
. �;,
„
:�
, . . . . i..��.
. f�
ff
{
' . �;
r:
• . . . � � � ��
. t:
. ' (;
, • � ��,
z,
S:
�w�
• , ., �w;,
, ; 1 �,
�'
�
I
: _...__.........__ _. _. .. .... ...
......�._ ....__. ....._.............-.._._..............._.. . __._.._....._. .... ....__....._._---.......___..._....._.. .._. .. ;;
.........._.......... --�--... .
, ,
. �;
� -, �� u,.
��,
; .
,. ' 'I�,1 MEl"ZGER/WASHINGTON SQUARE STUDY AREA _
.
The Metzger/Washi�gton Square study area consists 1.5 square miles of
u�incorporated Washi�gto� County, Oregon, north af the City of Tigard
and generally bouncied by the Multnomah-Washirrgton Cou�ty line o� the
east, Taylors Ferry Road on the �orth and S�tate Highway 217 0� the west.
"fhe area has an approximate papulation of 5,590 reside�ts i� 2,150
dwellings units with an assessed valuatio� of �232,559,700.�0. A
largely urban area, Metzger is primarily r^esiden�ial with commercial
pro�erties d�mi�ating the Washi�gton Square area west of Gree�burg
Road. The infrastructure is in place with the most significant problems
being surface streets, pedestr:ian network and drainage of storm water.
Under a joi�t r-esolutio� of the Tigard and 8eaverton City Councils
establishing an Annexatio� Pla�ni�g Area Aqreemer�t (APAA) the City of
Tigard has bee� i�dicated as the most logical pra�vider of municipal
services for the Metzger/Washington Sc{uare area.
Th+e Metzger area lies east of Grpenburg Road and .contains 1007G of the I
papu�lation and F16USYf1g stock with an assessed �valuatio� of
$154,077,300.00. Urtaan services are currently provided by Washing�on li
. County and six special districts. '
Washi. to� Square ' is the commercial complex we�t of Greenburg Road
ry9 .
, �
within the APAA with the residential and non—coanmercial land in the
coanplex in the City of eeaverton's realm of influence. Approximately
35,000 to 40,t?00 transient trips per day ar� made to the Square
'�
'complex. �uri� tfip holiday seasons, the �r�a��ient population increases ,
to over 75,OOQ per day. The em�playee population is estima�ed at 2,500
with average an�ua�. sales in excess of �200 millian.
. �
.. - ;
1.2 PROCESS AN� tEGAL REQUIREMENT$ � � . ;
. : . ' ' �'
,I
� The authority for a�nexation of co�tiguous territory ta a cAty is
outlined in 08tS 222.111 and may be ini�iated according to ORS 19g.490 as j
Follows: .
(a) 8y resolu�ion of the governi�g body of �the a,¢fected city (City of ;
r
Tigard), or , ;�
r.
(b) By petition of 107L of registered voters i� 'tfie affected territory, �'
or �
f
�
�
£
�.
E
� �.
— i —
� � � ~, � t� �.. .
' ' • ' If objections are filed by eie�tors of the affected territory, the _
Commissio� shall certify the f�ct to the County eoard of the affected
territory and the Cour�ty 6oard shall call_ for an election. When the
minor boundary change h�s been initiated by resolution of thQ City
Cauncil, the cost �f the election shall be paid by the affected city.
The electio� shall be held o� the next appropriate election date as
authorized under ORS 203,Og5, 221.230, or �55.345. The C.ity Council ar
' County Board shall certify the results of the electian to the
Commissio�. If a majority of vaters approve the change approved by the
Commission, the Commission sha11 praclaim the results. Upon adoptio�
of the proclamation the change shall take effect. (ORS 199,505)
1.3 SPE�IAL DISTRICTS
Currently, �ix special distracts serve the Metzger/Washington Square
community providing education, fire protection, water and wa.stewater
systems. '
1.3.1 Educatian
. The Metzger �rea is served by the Tigard School Oistrict
(23JT) with �the •Beaverto� School Oistrict (48JT) bisectir�g the
Washington Square island i�cludi�g th� Gnlde� Key Apartment
complex. Curr�ent 1985-86 tax rates are $11.55 per �1,000.00
+A.V. and �13.25 per $1,000.00 A:V. r'espectively. '
� I
1.3.2 Fire Protection ..:���. ... _ _ �
;
� ' _ i
. � , Washir�gton: County RFPO �`i is responsible for, fire protection �
service in the.majority of the Metzger/Wa.shington Square area �
� with the Tualatin: ,RFPO sewing the area, south of Spr�uce " j
� Street. 1985--86 tax rates are s2.65 per 51,000.00 A.V. for �.
� WCRFPO /11 and �2.6b per �1,000.00 A.V. for TR�PO. , �
. ;
�
1.3.3 Water • u
, ;i
Water service �in the area is provided ��by the Metzger Wate� ;
Oistrict with delivery contracts with the City of Portlaad for G
8u11 Ru� water through the •year 2000. ' Curren� charges are ;'
56.50 for the first 400 cu. ft. a�d thereafter �,95 per 100 `j
cu. ft, and 1985-86 tax �rate of �.67 per s1.000•OO A.V. 4
�
. � �
�
• � � � �� �fi
,
� � � R
�
�
. 1 �
. �
�
— � — ' x
�
�
�..� _
_._. .. .,:.:. �....�..... ...---. --�
.. ..�......._.._....___.._..._..........._ .....__.__...._�_`�---..__..—__._.. .... .— . . . ....._..______....___....._..._.. . .. �.,
,. ., �. �
, .' ' , o Turnover (X af ow�er-occupied units that change ha�ds) is
9.3X in the Study area to 11.27X i� the City. -
o Stabflity (X of populatio� age 5 or older livi�g in- the
same unit for 5 or more years) wias 34.5X for the Study
area vs 36.8X for the Cxty.
o Average hvusing value for the Study area was �67,8a6
versus �80,356 for the Gity.
o Average and median househald incomes are approximately
$4,000 less in the S�CUdy area. '`
r
The demagrapi�ic study shows that in most respects the Metzger/Washington
Square area is similar to the City af Tigard. The majority af
d'afferQnces are due to the commerci�al development and apartment �
complexes th�t are withi� tract 309 (generally west of Nall Boulevard).
The more detailed Area Profiles show that tract 306 is very much similar
to the City.
1.6 EXPENDITURE EFFdRT
The MetzgerlWashxngton Square area has r�ceived consistently lo�wer
levels of municipaY service� tha� if in the City of Tigard. The
Metzger/WashingL-on Sq�are area currently recei�es a per capita service
l�vel apqroximately 457� of �hat provided• for City of Tigard resic3ents. .
Of specific categories �tudiede only Parks consister►tl,y has a greater
per capita effort greater thar� Tigand. The most visible of municipal '
services delivered, Public Safety, shows an expenditure level of `
" apnroximately 47X of Tigard's delivery le�r,el.
w
.. . ;
. . . ' ' �_..'
b'.
k:
f'_
� t',
j.
t..
�:.
' �'•.
Ft
(nt
I;
F:7
. . � � j�:t'.
f%L
�'�!i.
�t'
. � EY}�
- 5 - • �+y�
,:
. . . . .r.y..
• , , . .
. ., . �. ��-A
, , . ' T;o more accurately compare the tax rates of the jurisdictions prnviding _ _
municipal services, the following table shows tax rates adjusted tv include
applicable special district rates.
MUNICIPA�. SERVICE OELIVERY SYSTEMS
TAX RATE PER �1,000 AV
JURISDICTION 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86
Portland 6.29 6.48 6,79 6.58 6.A3 6,71
Beaverton -
Municipal 5.37 7.01 6.48 5.23 5.52 4.23
Tual. Hills P.6 R. 1.14 1.13 . 1.33 1.19 1,21 1,34
� TOTAL 6.51 8.14 7.81 6.42 6073 5.57
Tualati�
Municipal• 2.12 3.59 3.36 3.3. 3.51 4.13
Tualatin RFPD 3.40 3.2�. 3.28 3.15 3.12 2.60
TOTAL 5�.52 6.80 6.64 6.45 6.63 6.73
Tigard
Municipal. .6a 1.19 1.12 1.18 1.06 1.35
�,,��fpp 2.80 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.71 2.65
TOTAL 3.4p 3.94 3.82 3.88 3.77 4.00
The following� is a table of tax rates as they would apply for
. Metzger/Washirigton Square tax payers and the estimated prnperty tax cost for
1985/86 based upo� a $65,000 assessed valuation.
TAX AGENCif METZGER TIGARO BEAVERTUN POR7'LANO
Municipal - .86 4.23 6,71
Wash. Ca. 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93
USA � .36 .36 •�6 �
School Oist. #23 11.55 11.55 i1e55 11.55
Metzger Water .03 .03 . .03 .03
Metzger Sar�itary .28 e2� .28 .28
Metzger Water Cambined .64 .64 ,., .64 .64
Wash. Co. ESO .25 .25. ' .25 .25
Port. Comm. Co'11. .58 .58, � , .58 .5a
� Wash. Co. RfPO #1 . 2.65 � 2.65 � - "
Port of Portland ..37 .37 .37 .�7�
. Metra Seru. Oist. � � :16 .16 .16 .16' .
Metzger Park � .12 .12 • - -
' Tual. Hills Pr.
6 Rec. Dist. � - - . 1.34 -
Total Tax Rate 18,92 19.F8 Zi•72 22•50
Total P'ropet^ty Tax 1229.80 1285.70 1411.80 1462.50
From Washington Courety Sunwnary of Asaessment 6 Tax roll, 19�5--86. .
. �
- 7 -
� �.,: -Y:. . . .... _..._.. . _ _. . ..
.�,� _ _ _. _. _. �:;_ _
_ . _ _
.....__. _._ _ ... .-___...._. . ........ .. . �
:_.. • , �
. .� . � z.. �:
, � i
•' � 2.2.1 FRANCNISE FEES -
_ _.
�.
Franchises are granted by governme�tal bodies to private corparations
providi�g utility servi.ces for a given area and allow those ,
corporations ta act as mo�opolies in those areas. This licen�ing of
� �he utilities allaws them use of public right-of-�ways.
FRANCHISE SERVICE AND PROVIDERS
'i
SERVICE PROVIDER FRANCHISE FEE
Electricity Portland Ger�eral Electric 3.57G of gross revenue
�latural Gas Northwest Natural Gas 3.076 of gross revenue
Telephone General. Telephone 3.OX of gross revenue ;
Pacific Northwest 8e11 3.OX of gross revenue j
S�1id Waste Oisposal Miller's Sani�ary Service 3.0% of gross revenue
�able 1V Storer Cable 3.OX a1F gross revenue
TCI Cable 3.AX of gross reve�ue
ESTTMATED YEARLY �RANCHISE FEE
FRANCHISE � ESTIMATEO FEE
Portland General Electric 150,000:00
Nortfiwest Natural Gas � 15,000.00
General Telephone 14,400.00
Pacific Northwest Bell 15,000.00 .
Miller's Sanitary 5ervice 4,8�•� �
Storer Cable •1•�,pp � ,
. � � 5.2.00.00
Tcz cabi
TOTAI. w $2U5,A00.00
2�2.2 FEES AND CHARG£S � : , � � `
. w.�
The City of Tigard requires payme�t f�r�the provisioh of administrative `
and regula�tory services such as business tax, sewer system, buildie�g
permits, etc. These fees a�d char�ges a11 computed to offset the cost �.,
of providi�g the specific servicea provided.
i:`
,.
,:
' � ,:_
4.':
�f;
. .. . . � � . $.'.�
}(;
{,.d�
. . . . . . . .. . . : Ih��'�?
� � .. . . � . ��i:
. • . . . . . . . .. . (<,;��.
.. � �� � . ,�� . � � . �� �J
an
- 9 - w�
�t,ri
�
���, ._..._ -� -� :� �_�,,.,:.� L «..�..�u.�...�....
,.
_ _
,_.
... ..__. __.... .._.......__.......__..._......
-"' "__�..... _.,._. ... k.'.
� ' ' . - k-',
. . �.. �`- -.
• TOTAL FEES AND CNARGES
� • . -
8usiness ?ax �15.250.00
�- liquor �icea�se _- 625.00
Sew�r User Chgs (Res) 121,905.00
Sewer User Chgs (Non-Res) 39,�52.Q0
TQTA� �177.,632.00
2,2.3 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SHAREO REVENUES AND ENTITLEMENTS
Revenues of the State of Oregoro and Washington Cou�aty are returned �a �
i�corporated areas through various revenue sharing programs. These
i�tergovernmental shared revenues (ie. gas tax, cigarette tax, etc. . .)
are essential�y "ak�a�do�ed" by residents of uni�cor,�arated areas such
as Metzger/Washirrgtan Square. These are taxes which are currently
being paid, but to which only Gity residents are entitled. For 1995/86
this amou�ts to more than �250,OOU with over one-third designated for
streets, sidewalks ar�d other tra�sportation system improvements. �;
� Federal revenue-sharing fund� are not projected du� to uncertainty of
. the prngram co�tinuing.
IIUTERGOVERNMENTAL SHAREO REVENUES
S1.985/86 RATES X POP OF 5,590)
STATE Of O{2�GORI
I�� - R ATE TOTA�
10 565.10
7ax
�
1.89 � . ,
Cigarette ,
`;' Liquar Tax 7.31 � 4d,862.90 �'
Gas Tax (Streets) 18,25 , 10�,017.50 ;,
State Revs�nue Shari�g 5.23 29,235,70 ;`
' � SUBTOTAL $32.68 �182,681.20 ; ;
� ... _.
.. ;;
� WASHINGTON OOUMY ' � ' . �
. . • , f '
� :Gas Tax (Sxreets) 5.76 • 32;198.40 �
Library �WCCL.S) 4.78 , . 26.72U.20 �
SlJ6TOTAL �10.54 ' s58,918.60 �;
��I
TOTA� j43.22 �241.599..80 '
.�
s.
i;
.. � � �,
. t;s
. �;
� �;:,
� � � �;;
Erv
� � ��_
" - 11 - . . � �r;
�,
� ;�
�.
�? - .
. . , .
2,3 ESTIMATEO REVENUE FLOW . �
' ESTIMATED REVENUES
: � REVENUE FLOW BY QllARTER � � ,)
G +
4TH QTR 1S'i QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TN QTR 1ST QTP. 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR I
ITEM 1986 1987 � 1957 . 1987 1987 1988 1988 1988 1988
Franchise fees 17916.66 1200.00 8400.40 1200.00 19466Q.00 1200.00 8400,00 1200.Q0 :
�
., ' �
Faes 6 Charc�es !
-
Business Tax 15250.00 15250.Q0 15250,40 .' ;
�, �.
i ;
! �iquor ticense 625,00 • • 625.00 625.00 ;
�
SQwer User ChargQS 13479.75 4Q439.2a .40439.25 40439.2a 4d439.25 40439.25 40439,25 40439.25 40439.25 i
ShAred Revenues a9030.40 456?0.30 45670.30 45670.30 45670.30 45120.34 45670,36 45576.30 �
�
Property Tax ,� 46540?.481 465403.482 �
T4TAL 29354.75 117386.31 87309.55 94509v„55 5685,_ 88.Q3 280709.55 87309,55 94509,55 568588,03 '
: ,
YEARLY TOTAL 29354.75 � . . 867793.44 • 1031116,50 �
�
i
� 1 Ta�x Rata 51.99/$1,000 A.V.
2 Shared itevanues - isfi quArter only, WCCLS Levy '
- - Excludes Wash. Co. Gas-Tax Revenue Due to Current Ins�ability. '
�
i
(. r..
. . � � i
��` ` `
' � .
� � Wastewater ' -
USA has identified two problems areas in he study area. They are the __
� addition of a parallel li�e ta the Ash Creek interceptor and replacement
of the Nemlock 5treet interceptor. Cost estimate is approximately
$400,000 for both .projects.
3.1.1 Si"REETS
Maveonent of vehicular traffic i� the area is hi�dered by the lack of
direct North/South a�d East/West cannectiorrs on the mai�ly rural type
lacal roa�ds. Washir�gtan Square and Li�cvin Center have �also increased
the amaunt of vehicle movement withi� the study are�. •
�'he Metzger-Progress Circulat�.on Study co�ducted by the Washi.�gtan
County Oeparttnent of l.and Use ar�d Transpartation is the source do�ument
for this portiori af the a�alysis.
1, Taylurs Ferry Road Extension �
Extec�d Taylors Ferry Road from Washington Orive to Oleson Road
upgrading it to major collector standards (70 feet
right-of-way, 40 feet pavQment width). Requires purchase of
additional right-o�-�way. Project would provide more direct
East-�West route for eeaverto�-Portland traffic and reduce
.. . traffic on Washiregton Drive. Because of the amount of traffic .
o� Taylors Ferry, it is anticipated Washingtan County would
maintain it as a Caunty Road. '
2. l.incoln Street Extension . . " � �
� Exte�d l.incoln Street fram Locust �treet to Oak Street� and
improqe to minor collector (60 feet of right-af-way. 32 feet •
pavement width). Requires additional right--of-wa�y.
3. Locust Street Improvement ,
Upgrade �ocust Street to major col�.ector status from Li.�col�
Street tn 80th Avenue.
� 4. 74th Street Exte�sion
Exte�d 74th Street from Barbara Lane to locust Street and
improve to mirwr collector. Requires cor�str�uctiora of a
. structure to traverse Ash Creek (�pproxima►tely 250 feet) and
' � additioreal right-of-way. Would pro�ide better North-South
access from Taylors Ferry to Highway 99W.
�
. � - 15 - � '
�; __ _.. . . :.�:. _.. ._:;.�.., - <--�. .,��_„�. w..�..�,::.
, � '
14. l.ocust Street �ridge (Ash Creeic) '
- Replace existing culvert with bridge wide enou9h for
pedestrian a�d bicycle traffic. County is applying for
�60,000 bridge replacement grant from Federal Highway
Administration. Preliminary e�gineering under� way.
CAPITAI NEEDS ASSESSt1EM' - Streets
COST COST TOTAL
Ik PROJECT RREA CQh�ii. RIG}iT-OF-IdAY COST
1, Taylors Fe�ry Rd. Ext. Metz �915,000 5263,000 �1,178,000
2. Lincol� St, £xt. Metz 165,000 73,000 238,000
3. Locust St. Ie�. Metz 520,000 . - 520,000
4. 74th Ave, Ext. tietz 718,000 95,D00 813,000
5. Intersection In�p. 72nd £
80th Oak St. Metz 1,500* � - 1,500
6. Nall Blvd/Scholls fy. Rd.
Znte�aectio� Imp. 4lash. Sq. 379,000 856,OQ0 1,235.00U�
7. Uleson Rd. Inrp. Metz/ 1,125,000 140,000 1,2.b5,000
Wash. Sq.
. 8, tiall 81vd. Iap. +� T1etz/ 3,305,000 900,000 4,2A5,000
UJash. Sq.
9. Greenburg Rd. Imp. ldash. Sq. 330;000 70,000 400,000
10. 80th Ave. Imp. Metz 1,030,000 - 1,030,000
il. Oak 5t. Imp Mctz 700,000 � - 700,000
12. Taylor� Fe�ry Rd. Lnp. Metz 840,000 L00,000 940,(900
1�. G('C'4fiflUPt�/�Mi�/. 217*�'�K �t2/
I�terchange Ia�p. Wash. Sq. 200,000 � 200.000 -
TOTRL �10,228,5Q0 52.497,Q00 �12,725.900
� Estiawte of Con�t. Cost. � Inclusion of 6 Y�. Hwy. Lnp.
� Joiot Ftmdiag USOOT. ODOT, LIO. ' ' ' Prog. Preli.m. Eng. -, f�987
• Const. 1989.
�� No Cost Ert, Wideoi�g .
� �'10Q,OOU� OOO�f Budget for�
' Re-st�iping.
1�}. locunt St./Aah Creek BrgQ. No Cost fstiawte. Mash. Co. has appl'aed fo� $60,000
Wideni�g (Pee!/Bicycle Iap.) Fed. Hay. Rdmia. B�idge ReplaceMent Grant.
,
�
SOURCE: •
Metzger/Prog�ess Circulation Study, Nas�iagton Coun4y LUT, Rug. 1985 ,
3.1.2 PEDESTRIAN NETWORK .
Improveme�ts ar�d new co�structio� of the pedestrian and bicycle networks
are required to ensure safety of residerots transitting to schools or the
Tri-Met system.
%'
' - 17 - � s;:;
};;;;�`
° �
' . � f, / !
1 . �. ' �0....
� � PROJECT � COST YEAR FROIW BASE
t2 - Replace Locust Crossing 147•9� � i
13 Replace Nall Crassi�g 14�•Q�� 2-4
14 Regrade Cha�nel Hwy 217/Fanna 141,700 19-20
15 Gold Course Oetention 17,500 3
16 Pipe Hall 156,6U0 13-14
17 Pi�e I_ocust 125,300 2
18 Pipe 91st 175,300 15-16
19 Pipe Chan�el 741,aao 5-10
20 New Oitch 89th/Ash Creek 24,100 20
21 Repl�ce RR Spur �Culvert 42,100 19
$2,237,900
Source: Ash Creek Orainage Mast�er Plan
3.1.4 WASTEWATER
Responsibility for the wastewater callection system in the Metzger area
lies with USA.� Washingto� Square has anc! maintains its ow� system and
e�ters �he USA ne�work north af Cascade, Blvd and Nighway 21'7.
. The majcrri.ty of the System is in place with. only 2 problem areas
• ' exx�ting and identified in the USA Master Plan.
Costs are �stfmated �o be apptroximately �4Q0,000 with those cnsts to be
pote�tiallyl shared with upstream users of;the system.
1. Go�struct 3,�OOU feet of interceptor parallel to existing line` .
� �rom Nall Blvd/Hemlock to 09th/Spruce �Street. :
2, Replace 4,004 feet of 15" ir�terceptor from kall Blvd/Nemlock
Streeic east to a point south of Vent�ara Coart.
, . ' . �
' - 19 -
_ ___. .... ._.:.,
..... .. ..... ....v.�
. _,.. _.
..� , --- ---
<
_..
_ . _
_ �...... .. ... �
. . .. « r . �
, ' F�olice - The Washingt�.� Cou�ty Sheriff's Oepartment c�., . ently ser�es the area �
• �, a�d pravides a� average respo�se time of 10 mi�utes on emergency .calls. The -
average for �he three surrounding jurisdictions is i� the 4 - 5 minute range, :
Greate�t impact on providing law enforcement serviees to the area is in down =
time far squads tra�spor°ting prisoners for bo��Ci�g. Current down �ime is a
approximately 1 1/2 hours per incident if transport to Nillsboro is i'
necessary. eaoking of. suspects at the local jurisdictio�s facilities wauld �
impact dawn time corespo�di�g to distance from Metzger; Portland at the
Oown�owr► Justice Center (8.5 mil�s), 8eavertorr at City Nall (3 miles) and i
Tigard at the Civic Center complex (1.5 miles). •
�'.
Parks and Recreation - An�exation ta Beaverton would also annex Me'tzger to �`
Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, Portla�d would most likely �;
absorb 'the Metzger Park into their Parks sys'tem, while Tigard will le� the f�
resider�ts decide upon the conti�uation nf the Metzqer Park 1.I0.
�i
;1
%�
tj
�'I
,�i
;�
t;
rl
ii
%'.a
. t'�
{.':
�:;
�:
,'
j
i
. �
. � i
. �.
� � � `��.�.
ri
r
_ ;-
- . €°,'
�.
�,:
i�
;.:,.
� .
�t'
4;.
,.,,
� ���I
i'.•
t,
��
. i;.
. . j
s
� ' � � � �� ��;
�
�`
r i`;
• . �.
' — 21 — � �`
' . ��,
� �
�,� _ W . .. __ �.._::. . __ - . .
, :... _.., t.�:;,.,
,. � �XN��►�r z.
'w.� 9�°w.... '�
CITY OF TIGAIiD
�SIVS YE�lN Al�NDlISNT II�VSN'A�OIiY
1g83 - 1989 I
Late 1983
CP� 9-83, ZC 8-83 denied
CPA 10-83� SC 2-83
Am�nded the comprehensive plan map by changxng from Washington County R-24 to
Tigard Medium-High Denaity Residential on 90 acr�s; from Washington County R-9
to City of Tigard Medium Denaity Residential on 38 acres; £rom Waahington
County Neighborhiood Cammercial ta �Cigard Commeraial Neighborhood on 4 acres.
CPA 11-83 eoid
CPA 12-83, ZC 9-83
A comprehensive plan ameadment to change the land use designation
from Light Industrial to General Commercial and a change in the zoning
designation from M-4 to C-3) �n 3.71� acres
CPA 13-�3 I�
An amendment of plan policiea 1104.2, 11.4.2.a and b, regarding NP0�4 area in
volume 2 li
CPIA 14-83 �
A comprehensive plan amendment to bring the plan into compliance with statewide
planning goal #5 with an analysie of ESEE factoro
I
CPA 15-83 �
A aomprehensive plan amendment to ahange setback requi.rements in the C-G and C-
P zoning elistricte (alsa part of CPA 2-83)
CPA 16-83
Corrected mapping error. A city-initiated comprehensive plan amendment to
change the land use deaignation from Medium Density Residential to Liqht
Industrial and the zoning designation from A-12 to M-4 on .89 acrea
CPl� 17-83, SC 13-83
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designa�fon from Zow to
Medium Deneity Residential and the zoning from R-7(PD) to A-12 on 28.27 acree
CPd� 18-83, SC 14-83
A comprehenaive plan amendment to relocate 4.35 acres of land zoned
Neighborhood Commercial along SW 135th. The land uBe deaignation changed from
R-20 to C-N
Page 1
� '��
w.
ORA 83-52
Repealed ordinances 82-77, $2-78, 82-79, 82-S1, 82-89, 83-04, 83-05, 83-07,
83-10, 83-24. Ratified text and mape of Tigard'a comprehensive plan and
Community Developrnent Code
80A 1-83 S�naitive Landa
1984
CPA 1-84
Amended the comprehensive plan map by adding low density reeidential land use
deaignationa to five tax lots off of 5W 132nd Street within urban growth
boundary
CPA 2-84
Amended sectinn 10.1 of voluane 2 regarding annexation of county land and how
the city will assign a city zoning designation
CPA 3-84
Amended ordinance �3-52 (entire code adopted in November 1983) and the
floodplais� and wetlands map
CPA 4-84, ZC 4-84
A compreheneivQ plan amendment to change the land use designat��on from
CoErrmercial Professional to High Density Reaidential and a zone change fr�om C-P
to R-40 on 4.33 acres
CPA �-84
Amended section 18.114.145 to add sign code exceptinn appraval criteria
CPA 6-84
Amended Chapter 18.130 of the Code, Conditional Usee, to ine�rt �tandazd� for
approval of transient lodging; whalesale atorage and dietribution;
participation sporics and recreation - indoor and outdoor; and vehicle fuel
salee wxth convenience salea.
C1PA 7-84
Amended all three volumes of the code to include reommendation of the state
Department of Enyironmental Quality pertaining to air quality regulatione
CPA 8-84
Amended palicy 6.3.2(b) of volume 2 of the comprehensive plan which deals with
compatibility standarda for deneity transition
CPA 9-84
Amended Chapter 18.2b by addinq several definitions to the Code
CPA 10-84
Amended numerous sections of the Code with small phra8es and changed policy
Page 2
, �
.. - !I
,
6.1.2 of volume 2 regarding the term subaidized hou�ing
CP� 11-84, ZC 8-84
A compzehensive plan amendment to change from Low Density Residential to '
General Commercial on. 5 parcels totaling 2.3 acree ,
CPFi 12-84 ZC 8-84
.
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use deaignation from Medium
Denaity Residential to Commercial Professional and the zoning designation to C-
P on a 1.38 acre arcel
P
I
-
CPl� 1384
Amended Ch.apter 18.9a, Height Limitations
CPl, 14-84
Amended and revieed the floodplain and wetlande map, and all. th,ree volumes of
the camprehensive plan. Amended Ardinance 84-28 and designated five apecific �
area�s as significaznt reeour�es on the wetlanda map. Poliay 3.5.3 was changed
to reflec� a prior designation of Fanno Creek and ite tributariee as
greenway/open apace. To section 18.84.015 wording was added to prevent
development in areas designated as signiEicant wetlande and on adjacent lands.
CPA 14-84
Am�nded the eite development review chapter to allow exceptinne to the private
outdoor area and ahared outdoor recreation areas requirements contained in
aection 18.120.170
CPA 14�84
Amended code aection 18.130.040 (A) (1) to specify the land uae reviews
manufactured home construction/placement is subject to. Also mentioned
exemptions.
CPA 14-84
Amended policy 6.1.2, Subaidized Houaing Dispereal and pcal.icy 12.1.1,
P
Residential Locational Criteria
CPA 15-84
Amended section 18.62 C-G and 18.64 C-P zoning districts, decreasing the front
yard and corner and through lot eetbacks
CPl� 16-84
Amended Chapter 18.32 by adding subsection .275 regarding the amenaea decision
procesa on adminiatrative deciaione
CPA 17-84
i
Amended Chapter 18.40.040 Reeiden�ial Deneity 7raneition exc].uding land where
the actual density in the established area exceeds the maximum density allowed ;
under the land use plan map designation for the eetablisheri area
�a
CP� 18-84
Amended the campatibility matrix contained in eection 18.26 of the code
and Falicy 6.3.2(b) ',
�
�
Page 3 �
i
�
t� v
CPA 19-84, �C 15-84
Amended appendix I - ESEE slocument of volume 1
CPA 20-84, SC 13-84
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land us� designation from medium
denaity to medium - high denaity reaidential on 2.9 acres
CP7� 21-84, ZC 14-84
A comprehensive plan amer►dment to change the land use designation from Heavy
Induetrial to Commercial Profeasional and the zoning designation from I-H to
C-P
CP� 22-84
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation on a 16.41
acre parcel from medium - high density residential to high density residential
CPA 23-84
Deleted po].icy 6.1.2, Subsidized Houaing Di�persal in Single Family Zones, amd
Policy 12.1.1.4, Residential Locational Griteria
CPti 24-84
Policy 6.3.2. of comprehensive plan was amended; Developing and Eetablished
Areae
(:PA 25-84
Amended appendix l, ESEE documen�, of volume 1 as originally adopted in
ordinance 83-52
CPl� 26-84
Amended policy 11.5.1, of volume 2, Huffering and Screening
CPtI 27-84
Designated Mallard Lakes aa w�tlands in the comprehensive plan and wetlanda
map
CPI! 28-84
Amended volume 1 of the comprehenaive plan in order to ineert a list af
significant we�tlanda areas
CPA 29-84
Revised the floodpla►in and weti.ands map ae amended by ordinance 84-36 and ae
originally adopted b�r ordinance 83-52. Removed wetlande deeiqnat:ion fram
certain areas
CPA 30-84/
A compreheneive plan amendment which amended plan policiee 3.101, 3.2, 3.2.3,
3.4.1 and added policy 3.4�2 of volume 2 and 3e4.2 of �volume 2
ORD 84-01
A "houaelceeping" oxdinance which repealed titlee 16, 17, and 18 in their
entire�y
�:
Page 4 r
I!;
,
l�'�
f-a
�.�
!'r
E..
��,i
`<� �
ORD �4-40
Amended volume 1 of the comprehensive plan to include an assessment of
manufactured homes
R$S 84-48/ORD 84-46
A comprehensive plan amendment to inereaee the number af units in the R-20 zone
from 20 to 25 units p�r acre; also amended the comprehensive plan map, the
buildaL-le lands map and the buildable land� inaentory contained in volume 1 of
the Code
1985
CPA 1-85, ZC 1-85
A compzehensive plan amendment from Central Businea� Distriat to Mediuym High
Density Residential and a zone ahange from CBD to R-25 (25 units/acre) on a 2
acre parao].
CPA 2-85, ZCA 1-85
A comprehenefve plan amendment to change the land use designation from
Washington County to City of Tigard Low Density Residential and to change the i
zoning from Ofice Commercial anc� Low Density Residential to C-P and R-4.� on �
28.94 acres i
,
CPA 3-85, ZC 3-85 denfed
GPA 4-85, ZC 4-85
Relocated a Coma�ercial-Neiqhborhood zane to a nearby ei�e zoned R-25 (eee aleo
CPA 18-83/ZC 14-83}
`i
CPA 5-85, SC 6-85
A comprehensive plan amendment tn approve a change in land uae designation from
Commercial Professional to Light Induetrial and a zone change from C-P to I-L
on 21 tax lots (11.33 acrea) near SW' Sandburg Street
CPA 6-85, SC 7-85
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designatia�n from Low
Density Reeielential to Medium Denaity Reeidential and a zone change from R-4.5
to R-7 (Mara Woode Subdivieion) on 1.7 acres
CPA 7-85
A comprehenaive plan amendment affecting the Red Rock Creek/ Villa Ridge
Ravine in volume 1
'
� CPA 8-85, ZC 9-85 � ?�;
A comprehenaive plan amendment changed the zoning on 28 acres from Washinyiton
County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5 on 6 parcels; from Wahington County Off:Lce t';
Commercial to City of Tigard Commercial Professional (C-P) on three other x`:
parcele. A eignificant wetlands overlay designation was placed on 3 parcels.
�.
Page 5
t'
i::
$'
�Y
}.
4J-
{•.
;,� `�
CPA 9-85, SQ1 11-85 and ].2-85
An annexation of 23.26 acres £rom Wa�hington County to City of Tigard Medium
High Density Reaidential; zoning became R-25. East of Murray Blvd., between o1d
and new Scholls Ferry Roads
CPA 10-85
Amended 18.82, Hietoric Disatricts (file mieaing)
CPA 11-85, ZC 7-85
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation from Medium
Deneity Residential to Light Industrial aqnd for a zone change from R-12 to I-P
on a 9.35 acre area immediately north of Upper Boones Ferry Raad
CPA 12-85, ZC 14-85
A comprehenaive plan amendment to change the land uae designation from Light
Industrial to Commercial General and a znne change from I-P to C-G {Warehouse
Floore prapexty) on 2.87 aares
CPli 13-85, ZC 15-85 denied
CPA 14-85, ZC 6-�84, 80A 6-85
Designated four specific parcels of land aA Historio Overlay Districte (HD)
bydeleting references to the Hearinga Officer; added criteria for �he removal
of the Hietoric Dietrict designation and provisiona for the demolition or
alteration of a historic etrueture were added
CPA 15-85: aee 8�1�1 9-85
CPA 16-85, �CA 16-85
A comprehensive plan amendment to change th�,,;; land use and zoning designationa
on two properties from Washington County R-5 •�o City of Tigard R-4.5;
total area 34.9 acres
ORD 85-41
An ordinance ratifying all prior ordinances enacted by the Tigard City Council
for clarification purposes
1986
CPl� 1-86, ZC 3-86
A compreheneive plan amendment to change the land use deaignation from Medium
High Density Residential to Comme�rcial - Neighborhood on 4 acrea
CP� 2-86, ZC 4-86 denied
CPl� 3-86, ZC 5-86
A compreheneive plan amendment to change the land use deaignation of a .52 acre
parcel from Medium Density Residential to Commercial General and to change the �
Page 6 ;
k
{
� �
zoning designation from R-12 to C-G. Correction of a map error
CPA 4-86, ZC 6-86
A comprehensive plan amQndment to change the land use designation from Low
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and the zoning from R-4.5 to
R-7 on .37 acres.
CPA 5-86 witt►drawn
CPA 6-86, ZG 10-86
A comprehenaive plan amendment to change the land uae designation from a
mixture of low to high deneity residential to Commercial General and to ahange
the zoning da�signatione from a mixture of R-1 through R-4.5, R-25 and R-40 �o
C-G on a 22 acre eite
CPA 7-86, ZC 15-86
A aomprehensive plan amendm�nt to change the land use deaignatione from Heavy �
Induetfal to Light Ineluatrial and to change the zoning designati�ns :Erom Y-H to
I-F on an 8.12 acre eite
CFA 8-8fa, ZiC 16-86 denied
CPA 3-86, ZC 17�86 denied I
CP2l 10-86, ZC 15-86
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation from
Commerci.al Profeasional to Commercial General and Neighbo.rhood Commercial and
to change the zoning designations from C-P ta C-G and C-N on a 3.9 acre site I�
CPA 11-86 I
A comprehensive plan ame�ndmant to change Riverwood Lane from a minor collector
street to a local atreet on the comprehensive plan transportation map.
CP2l. 12-86
A comprehensiv� plan amendment to change SW 135th from a major to a minor
collector street on the compreheneive plan transportation map.
ORD 86-23
Amended numeroue land use applicatidn code aectians to bring them into
conformance with ordinance 86-OS
1987
CPA 87-01, ZC 87-02
A compreheneive plan amendment to change the land uee designation from low to
medium density reeidential and the zoning deeignation from R-4.5(PD) to R-7(PDD
on nine parcele (23 acree) (alao CPA 6-86y
CPA 87-01, SC 87-02
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation from medium
denait� residential to medium high density residential and the zoning
;'.
Page 7 r�
,�
r
i1
i:
�`;
};
�
designation from R-12(PD) to R-25(PD) on 9.5 acres
CPA 87-01, 8C 8�-02
A compreheneive plan amendment to ahange the land use deaignation from medium
density reaidential to high denaity residential and the zoning designation from
medium high to high on 17.3 acres
CPli 87-Q2, SOA 87-01
A�riended sectiona of Ckia�ter 18.84 of the Code to update and bring city
floodplain regulations into aompliance with FEMA National Flooei Insur�nce
Program regulations. Also amended eec;tions 18.26.030, 18.H4.040 and 18.160.020
CPl°l 87-03, SC 87-06
Assigned an Action Area (AA) overlay designation to the Central Bueinees
District (180 acres)
CPA 87-04, ZC 87-18
A comprehensive plan amendment for a change from Commercial Profe��ional to
C�mmercial General and a zone change from C-.P tr� C-G on two parcels
CPA 87-05, 8C �7-�.9
1� comprsheneive plan amendment for a ahange from Cammerc:ial Neighborhood to
Commercial General and a zone change from C-N to C-G on two parcels (.78 gcres)
CPA 83-86, SC 87-20 denied
CF�A 87-07 withdrawn
CP� l37-Ot�,, ZGA 87-24
A comp• ����nsive plan a�endment to change the land use desiqnation on 19.15
acrea �.rom Washingtor� Coun�y R-6 to City of Tigard Medium Density and the
zoning to R-7
198�
CPA 88-01, ZC 88-03
For a comprehenaive plar� map amendment from Low Density Residential to General
Commercial and a zone change from R-3.5 to C-G for approximately 5.7 acrea
CP� 88�02, ZC 88-0$
A compreheneive plan amendment from Light Industrial to Public Institutic�n, and
a zone change from I-P to R-12(HD) on one parcel (8.19 acres) (Durham School)
CPA 88-03, ZC 88-09
A comprehensive plan amendment to change the land uae designation from Public
Inst�tutic�nal to Medium Density Residential and to change the zoninq
designations from R-4.S to R-12 on 4 acrea near Cook Park
CPA 88-04, SC 88-10 denied
Page 8
r�
}
t� �s
CPA 88-05, ZC 88-11 deniec3
1989
CP� 89-01, 8C 89-01
A c:omprehenaive glan map amen�iment changing a 3700 aquare foot parGel fxom High
Deneity Resiflentir�l to General Co¢nmercial and the zoning deaignation from R-40
to C-G.
CPl� 89-02, ZC 89-02
A compreheneive plan map �mendment chanying 4.27 a�rea from Medium Denaity
Residential to Medium-High Denaity Residential and the zoning de�ignation from �''
R-12 to R-25.
CPA 89-03, SC 89-03
A compreheneive plan map amendment changing 6.4 acree from Low Density I'
Residentisl to General Commercial and the zoning deeignation from R-3.5 to C-G. y
CPlil 89-04, SC 89-04 �
A com�pzeheneive plan map �mendment changing 1.75 acres from Profeeaional f
Commercial to Medium-High Deas�ity Residential anri 3.�2 acrees frnm Med�um �
Density Residential to Medium-High Deneity Residential with zoning �iesignation
changea from C-P �to R-25 and R-12 to R-25 respectively. i
i
CPA 8J-05, SC 89-05 �
A comprehensive plan map amendment changing 1.84 acree from Low Density
Reaidential to Frofessional Commercial and the zoning design�tion fram R-4.b �o
C-P.
CPPi 89-06, ZC 89-06
A comprehenaive plan tran�aportatian map amendment changing the alignment of
Burnhsm and Ash Streeta.
CPA 89-07, SC 89-07
A compreheneiv� plan map amendment changing 6.4 acrea from Commercial
Profeaeional to Medium-High Deneity Reeidential and the zoning desi.gnation €rom
C-P to R-25.
CPI� 89-08 denied
Page 9
� ° �x�+��►rr 3
� ��
Formula for Determining Fees
Caetes a direot labor = ave. hours x nst wage
b direct materi�ls & ser.vi.ces = 20� x a
c indirect overhead = (department) 10� x (a+b)
(city) 20$ x (a+by
Total Cost = a+b+c
Fees are determined by the coat.
�_ FEES & CNARGES ,
Fe�s �nc� ch�.rges include lic:E�nsea an<� ���r�•ma.t:s rEC�uirec� k�y the Ci.t;y ar �i:t:�i:e
ror selcct:ed acL-iviLi�s Por r��<�u].aLut^y �urr�nac�s. Thcase �cL-iv'rLies ��re
s�l.ecl-.ec� k>er.��.ise ofi i�hic� n�<�l�r,, s<�f�ci�y, car� mc>ral. concE�r•ns wl��ic.Ni mray ar�•is� if
Lhe C:i.ty ciS.<� ric�L t�k� an 4�cLiu� n�.ar•L in �heir coritr•ul. :Cn ma•::� c:ascs,
�x��lic.<:zi:ic:�n fc.7i^ � 1i.cen:>� �sur..hi r:zs �i .li��ta��r° 7.i.cEansE� i.s cxcc.omp�zni.k�c� l;�_y ari
ir�s�c�cLiun of ���� ia�asin�ss h�y t:l•�� �:>c�r•Li.rierit c�c�r��r�Lmc�nt. •
Iri i:1(:IC.I].�:.L011 t.:�> li.c:enssE��, thc�rE� �r°E� �a ntairik>a�r c.,f•' �c�r•mits of a r�ac�ulrat:c�ry ncat:ur°Ea
wl•ii.c.h ar•e i^c�i{iai.rczd fcar• <;er•L-�:�iri acLa.vi i:i.t�:> <a:>r��cir�l.ly fc�r• bui.l.diru�
consi:r�.ici::ior�. E3�.ii.l.<ii.n<� Pc�r•iri.i.Ly <:►].1����, i::h�� C:i.i:y i;a r���al.�i:F? r:�l.l. i��cw
cc>nsi:ruct:ion, <assurii��g c:oriPormaric;c w9.i�l�i mzni.mum s�afc�L-y r�quir�tanu�nL-s sc?1: by Lhe
si:<�i:Ea. r��,�r,�;nic<�t, p.liamhS.nc7, and sew��r Fx�r•mi.t:s f��r• nc�w cori:>i:r�uci�i.c.,r� ancl/or.
I a7.t�r�Li.c�ns, assure i:it:y <:c�i��Lr•�_�l ovcr I�ic�c�iLh �uid s�t'ca�y �specLs c�f tl•�c�sc
aci�iu7.�i.E�s.
Ecui.l.c�ir��� pc�rmi.t::> �ncJ �hc� like rc��res��nt: niahlic. c..�.,rit:r,o.l over �r•i.v<:ri:�a �cl:ivi.i�y.
(•lnoi�f•icr sc�L- of K>ErmiLs rc�gul�L-� ��r•ivaLe use uf- �uk�lic {�r�o�>c?r•L"y -- �r•imar,ily
str�eei:s, anct �uk�li.c righ�s--oT--way. T��e Enc.�i.n�eri.nq qi.uisian ��r Canimun9.i�y
Dev��lo�am�nL h�as pr•im�ry r��sr�unsiH>ility fur• sL��•ecL orac�nir�c�s, scah�divisiun
p�^ujecL-s, �nd sewc�r m��9rt insi:a].laLions. E3y issuir�c� pc�i^mii�s, i:h� Ci.ty �rut:�ul:s
{�ul�lic raroper•ty F�y guardirx� �a<�ainsL dang�►^ous �r uriauLhuc^iz�d us�,
"f'h� Ci.ty prauidES a u<�ri�i�:y ar s�ruic.es i:e.� Lh�.� communi.�y, s�rvic:es whi.cr� �r°F�
rio1: sh��r��d by al.l cii�iz�ns in c��ner•�1 to t�l�u� s��m� cie��r�c� uf i�encfii:. Wh9.le
tF�� service� clo skrvcr cc�mmuni�y--•wi.c�e i.r�Leresi�s, �he Ci.i:y ofi 'i"iycar^d hit�� f�c�.��n
ablc to id�ni:i('y th� �rirnary users u(� cert�ain s�rvi.c�s, �nd measur� th� custs
of those services, in d�velop9.ng equii;ahle charg�s. CFi�rges ror Sk?I"UlCES
�ruvided bg� L-hie City ar•e derived k�y a nuniYa�r of inei:hucis. Qne metriod is
tNi�^ough ar7 examin�i:ian and me�suremeni: of t;he amuun� 04� si:affi time, expertis�,
and materials required to prouid� a giuen seruice. Charges sL-at�d f-ur Lhe
. processing oP land—use planning applications �re an example of tFiis mei:Miod ur
costing services. Ane�ther meLhod used f-or d�velu�aing charges for services is
tht^��ugh analysis c�f i;he casts r�c{uired �o cunstruct and/or^ n►ai.ni;ain public
faci.lities, in r�elation to i:hc nuiuber of- users, ar�d LN�e amourti: uf use by each
us�r. The £+ewer Users Service Charge is an example �f this meL-hc�d, whee^eby
sysL-em cnnstructian and mainL-enarice cosLs are allocat:�d tn users according to
the number of users on the sysi:�m, and tr�e number uf plumbing Pixi:ures per DUE
(dwelling unit equivalent) . A related meL-hod for deL-ermining charc�es fur
. services zs utilized in assessing systems deuelopmen� charges. - These charges
are derived frum an evaluati�n �f the added cost impacLs uP new deve].upmenL in
a communi�y, wherein greater burdens are placed on existing public facilities
a].ready canstructed and maintained by past and present residents. The extent
�o whiah exi:ra—Gapacity public impravements are requir�d �a accommodate these
increased asaqes constitui:es the service charges.
Aside frum the income di.�^ectly generated by service charges, athar indirecL-
benefits accrue �o the City. Use of- charges for set^vices provid� a mure
equit�ble distrxbu4:ion of benefits and custs, particu].arly for those services
to persons or businesses L-hat utilize the' servi.ce but reside ouLside the
taxing bc�ur►daries uf the CiL-y. Also, the revenues generated through seruice
charges provide an ongoing source oP d�L-ailpd daL••a regarding i:he seruice in
quesL-ian, and �he level af consumer demand.
— 10 —
,
,.; _ _. . ,w... ..4 _.___
BLASTING PERMIT FEE ((��.�, . #1�•-436a�) ��
Invesi�ig��t.ing, ev�lu�i:i.ng ari�l pi^ac�ssir�g i:Ni� circumsi��nces inva].vec) in i:h�e use
�r <ax�lusiv�s wiLrii.n L-hu� CiL-y L� ensure puh�l.ic sar�ty ar�d w�14��r•� r�y 1imiLing
suc:.h u,e witr�in :;af� ���^amc�i:Er•s as c�eter�min�d by i�l•�e Ci.ty Enc�xr��er (l"MC:
7,32.Of30; Rc�s. 87--1!�9)
�tcJ��.��i:�'•_�.
131�sLir�g P��r�iriit: 1=c�� ��a.�!�
JOINT APPL]':CATIOIV PLANNING FEE pOLICY
-I"N�er� i.:> �� sha�r•i�d s�uirx�s ��n m<:�i�iy uf t:hca �.laririi.�•x� fc�c�:> if Lh� arar�7.ic:<:�Lie�ns �r�z
fii.lc�d t.o�etr�er� a�s onE� �ro�;x�:>aJ. . �;�+�i.i�c�s �i�•F� fr•c�m �ht�r'9.nc� in �i].�� s<•-�L--•u6�,
a��l.ie�t:iran ��a.si:r•ibuL-S.<•in, .le��l nr�ti.ce, �ai�u� r���aririg/;>�af'f- ���avi�w ac:.l:i�i.t9.rs.
"fa �<:ass this r��rtc�fifi: c,n t�:ca i:hca cic�v��7.oF�<�r i:YiE� f-c�l.l.oc,�i.rt<:� �i:ru�.i:ui^� i:.
i^ecummcaric��d.
Fl�o.1���d
q or higl•i�sL- r�lanriiric� f����: �p()�
Plus 9� c.�f all adcJii:9.�.�nG�1
pl.��nnir�g f�a�s un �r��posal ��ry
COMP'REHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING (Acc1:. #10•-••A�800)
To cr,vcr L•l��e cusL-s uf SLdrr- time ar�d n«t:ificat;iuns for �ru�essing or
ap��l.ic.aL-ions, 2 �ublxr. rioi�ir.es, �nc) 2 K>lar�ni.ng commissi�.�n tnE?e{�inys. (I..MC;
18, & RF�sc.�l.ution No. F37--159)
F�.dnpted.
TexL Only � 61'
M�a� Only �' �'r�
Lioth Text & Ma� $ ti75
Z.ONE CHANGE PROCESSING (Acc1;. �#10-Q3800) �
Tu couer the cosLs of sLaYf i:i.me and filing fur �rocessir�g and mc�eti:ngs.
Review af changes tu tMe City's �dapt�d zuning map, Review by Planning s+:dr-r-
and Pubxic hear•ir�g befure the Planning Commissi�n requit^ed in Sec�i�n 18.32 or
�he Crmmuni.ty Develapment Code. (TMC 16.32; Res. N�. 67-159)
,8���.d
Less thZn ten acres $520
Ten or More Acres $625
ZONE GHANGE F�NNEXATIONS (Acct. l�14-43800)
Reaiew or annexations and assignment af zoning designations to property ta be
annexed. Review and public hearing bef-ore Planning Commission and Gi�y
eouncil required under, TMC 16.13'6. �Res. No. 67-159)
���
l.ess 4:han ten acres " . $ 520
Ten or' mare acres $ 62`�
- 20 -
�
ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENI`+� �l�cct-. �'t10••-438�0) ;�
Reuiew �nren�ImenLs Lc.� t:he Communit:y Uevel�.�pment Code. Reviww and public.
F�eat^ings �a�Ture I�lanriirig Cuirunissie>n and City Cour�cil. r�quir�er.l in Cha�ater 1R.32
�f the Cammuriaty �evel.�7pmer�t C:�de. {Res. Nu. Si"-159)
f�d,��ci
(-�a� ��31�
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCE�SIIUG (Flcct:. �r`•lU•--�I if3(1C.�)
To c��u�r LM�� c��sL� c�f si:�xf'f- t;irne �r�d fil.irx� fnr r�r��cc�ssirig �.�rid mc?c�Lirx�,,
a.nclucli.riq i:he.� Y'P_U.Lh�i11 of i:h�� �i..c,�c�sa7. r:�rx:l <��t:�i..l.cacl pl.<�r�s aricl puk�l.ic: hic�i^irx�:;.
("fMC 18. ; Res, Jr`•237.._].59)
fl��,r�i�E�d,
C��ric<�r��ual nl�ri Rcv.'tc?w ...---
, L1ei��i.l��d F�1�n R�viNw --_......_.
(,unci�atu�l & DeaLailed Pl�n Rcauicaw $ 730
CONDITIONAL USE PRnCESSING (Flcc�. �10-••h3$C�0)
Review of pera�iL rec{u�ast, Fi�ar•ing berore li�aarirx�s Of-ri.c��r �s r�c�quir�c� ur�d�r,
TMr 1 ft.
�d��d_.
C�.�nciiLiunal Us� Reui�w � 3G�
TEMPORARY USE PROCESSING (Acct. #1d-4380U)
Tu cuv�r L-rie cnsL-s uf- sL��fr L-im� �nci filirig i=ur^ processing, notif-icatiuns .
Review c�f permiL r^eq�a�si;s by i.he Planning Directar^, Planning Cammission, or
City Council depending un Lhe 1engl:h uf Lhe p�rmit;. Req�ired in T'MC 18. 140
(Res. No. 87-159)
• 8���:�.
1 i:o 3 months by DirecL-�r $ 78.00/inu. �
i
3 montF�s tu 1 year by $ 155.00 i
Planning Coinmissiun/Gity Gouncil j!,
Speci�i Exen�ptian/Non—�rofit $ —0— P
j
i
VARIANCE-ADMINISTRATIVE (Acct. #10�43800) !
Reuiew of requests for variances to Development Code requirements on existing �
lots oF record. Review by Plan�ing QirecL-or required in TMC 18.134 (Res. �
87-159) i
�
6��. �
,
;
F�� $210 i
i
',
•
�
s
— 21 —
�,.�as ,:; .. r ..:, ,... � :.... ,,:.
SENSITIVE LANDS - FLOODF� LN (f�ccL-. /�10�-43800) ,�
Revi�w of- request:: t�� ali�er i�Nie i:opoc�r��hy wii�hin i:t�E� IOQ yEar flocad�l.�in.
fl�vicw uP requ�5t�s �rid �n<�ineering calcu�.aL'iuns and deLc�r�a�inaL-i�.�n of- imp�acL-s
k�y Pl�nninq Direci;or and CiLy Engi.n�c�i^ requir�ed (c:urr•tantly r��quirE�s ►^evi�w k�y
I�c�arinc�s Orf ictr) . (TMC 18.f34) (Rns. £37--159)
F�ric�.�>i';FC�
1=t�� �`•�20
SENSI't'IVE L6�NDS - ADMINISTRATIVE (f1r..c.{:. �h`J.0--43£3UC1)
R�ui.cw �af rc�c�ueSLs Lo a.lt��r Lhie 1:a��ogr4a�:>h�y ir� ��cLl.�ric�s c�r st:c?�� slr��:>� ��r•ca<�.
Revi��� �,f r°ec�u��:>ts <�nc� cl��t�rmiri�.�t:9.c�n ofi imra�ci� h�y Cit�y [.nc�a.ric�r �i�icl f�1�nr�i.ny
17irect;oi^ r•c�yuire�ci, ("I"MC 18.8�t)
Ac1 c.�:�cJ
1=c?e �i15Q,00
SITE DEV�LOPMENT REVIEW PROCESSIfUG (�cci;. h`10--438U0)
"i'o cover c�sts uf sLaff time �nd filir�y for r�roceysing, �uF�lic nuLic�s, fi.eld
visil:, and me�tiru�s, Review of site plans fur �11 nEw deuel���m�nt �xc���
single family humes and du�alexes which is r�UL- �art of- �any ot;hc�r d�velupmcriL.
R�view by Planni.ng Dir�c�or is r-equired. ("fMC 18.7.20; f:€s. 87--159}
AciszC�t�
Urtdcr $10,p�U $ 8Q
$ 1U,C�00 - $ 99,999 $ 155
$100,000 - $4�39,9�9 $ 315
$SQO,OC10 -- $999,999 $ 415
$1,0OO,OpO or more $ 520 -i- $1 per
$3.O,OU4 aver
�1 milliun nut '
t� exr.eed $2QC►q.
MINOR LAND PARTITTON - RESIqENTIAL�' (Acc�. �`#10-43800)
Reuiew p�rtiLioning of- o^�sidentiall� zoned land intc� three �r f-ewer parcels
wiL-huut L-he �acatian of' a public right-uf-way. R�uiew by Planning Director� is
required T�MC 18. (Res. No. 87-�.59)
��
Resideni:ial $235
�� Rect+mmend chianging tiL-le to Land Parti_tion - Resi.dential (Major ��r Minor)
MTNOR LAND PARTITSON - NON-RESIDERITIAL� (Acct. #10-43800)
Ree�iew partitioning of non-residentially zaned land ir�to three or fewer
parcels withoul the creation of a public right-of-way. Re�i�w by Planning
Directar is required TMC 18. (Res. No. 67-159) �
�
Non-Residential $235
� Rec�.�mmend changing title to Land parLition - Nan-Residential (Majol^ ar Minor)
_ �2Y
'� , . : ,�
SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARYi, AT (Acct. �10•-43800)
Reuie�A� of- cr�ai�iUn ��r �r-��u� c�r mo�^e l��Zs with� ��r wii;h�iiat the cre��ti��n of a
�ublic riy(��L'•-or-way. R�vi�w ar�ci r�ublic hieaririy h��fr.�r� f�lanninc� Cam�rrissiun
rec�uired TMC 18. (Res. N<�. 87-159)
�
�d�t cr.� I
I�M'Cl.11il. P�.i;IL'" �415 •i-��•'�/loL-
F C?l� __......_.....
S�abdiuisian Var-i.�nc� if- neae<icad �;105
APPEAL OF DIRECT�RS DECTSION TO PLANNING COMMISSION (Fte.ct:. �`]0--•43aG0)
R•r•_vx�w and prncc��sin<� uf ar�r>czal is r,e�c�ui.rcd in Chz��7L-�r 18 .3?_ uf- Lh� Cummtanity
Dc�ue].aK�mtani; C;�.�r�E�. T�; 9.:; i�h�c� fir•st. �,�I�c�rt�unii�:y far an�>l.icrani: i:c� cii.:>c.�.iss �:►rid
c.l-ar�iry r�r��lit:at:ion. "fMC 1£3. (R�as. Nu. f37--1.!�9)
Ac�o�Lecl,
1�t�e �i''L35
flPPEAL OF PLANNING COf'�`1ISSION OR HEAR:INGS OFFICER DECISIOfU TO CITY COUNCIL
(Acct. #10•-43t300)
R�view and �ar��cessinc� required in Ch�3r�t�i^ 18.32 c�r i:hE C�mmuni.�y Clevel��pmeni:
(;ocic� `fMC 18. (Rc�s. Nt�. 87-1.!"a9)
F�d�i;ec�
Rcview Fee �;315 •i-
l"ranscri�{�
CasL-s
VACA�IONS/STREETS AND PUBLIC ACCESS (Acct. �i0-43800)
l2evi�w requests �c.� v�cai:ing public properL-y fnr pri�ate use. ' (Ordi.nance
85-Q1) A�plicant responsible ror all custs �nd is billed by the City
Reuorder. TMC 15.08.1E0 (Resol.. 87-159)
��� . �
Fee based un actual costs $30d deposits
actual casts �
STREET/i.AND DEDICATION (Acct. #10-436) ;
Review street/land dedication paper�s (Res. No. 84-19A)
i
� �
�
Fee (does not include filing fee) Repeal.ed ;
FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS - DEVELOPED LOTS (Acci:. #10-43800) i
Review af- requ�sts for 4�lexible s�t back sLandards on developed luL-s. Review j
and decision by Planning Director requir�ed in Chapter 16.146 �f the TMC. �
(Res. No. 87-159)
i
,
�� x
I
F�e $105 �
- 23 - �
r
. S
V'^`. � . _ . i
HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRI(�y (�cct. #10-43800)
Review af ali�:erz�tiur�s, addil:i�tins or den�olitii��ns to sl:ru t:cares ��n sii:es with
the I•iisL-oric Distr•ieL �u�r^lay. Review �n�i public hearing before i:h� H�arings
Ofric�r �^equ9,t^ed under� CP�arter^ 16.82 of i:he TMC (Res. No. 87-159)
.B�I��' .
1=ce $£3c)
T'REE REMOVAL P�RMIT (AccL. 9f1U—A380Ct)
R�vi�w ��ric� rar•t�<:r�:'ss L-r•c�e r•��mc�ual r�c?r•mit r��qu�sL-s. Rc�vi.�w i�y IJir�iacLor r�<�quir�d
under• C;h4�zpt;��r° 1£�. 1.5C� t�f' LF�� "i"MC: (f2E�:'>, Nt�, f�7_..15�)
.�����
1=c?� ••----•-
ACCESSORY USES/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (Acct:. �1(1—A38Q0)
R�vi�w of r•ec�u�sL-s for �cc�ssury uses �nd sLructures. Rcui�w r�quir���d �rici�r
Ch�pi�er 18.144 �if= i;hie TMC (Res. Na. 87-159)
��
Fee $ 80
INTERPRETA7ION OF COP'1PIUNZTY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CONMIUN:ITY DEUELOPMENT
D€PARTMENT
(Acct. #10-43800)
RPView requ�si:s t'or .interpr�ei:�i:ions on i;he Communii:y pevelc.�pment Gode.
12esponsibility �f- Cade ini:erpretatian a.s tFie Direci�or`s as seL for•L!� ir�
Sectiun ].8.12 of th� TMC (Res. No. 87-159)
� �
Fee $ 55
��
' LOT LII�E ADJUSTMEN�' (Acct. #].0-43800)
Review and pracessing of lot line adjustments. Review and decisio� by
Planning Director required in Chapter 18.162 of the 1"MC (Res. No. 87—�59)
fl�lS t�d
Fee $210
i
g
— 24 —
9
� - . Q rr�lck�N�Nr � ;
� �. . �'.
�
�
� �-
� WE'TLAND I�IVENT�RY AA1D A�SESSME�TT �'I
,;
FOR TI�� C�PY OF TIGARD, 4REGOIV ';i
� f'
R'.
,-�
`�
�.
�:
;'�
• �-?,,
;;I'
� �;I
I
� �
,
�
� PREPA�R.ED FOR:
�
;
City o£�gard
� Com�aunit�De�velopaucnt Department
13125 SW�iall Boulevard
Tigard,Uregon 97223
� ' I'�
PREPARED BY:
Randall A.Jones
Steven R. Helm � ``
� T.eslie J.Anderson '"
ScQentific Resources,Inc.
� 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 375 �;
Iake Oswe� go,Oregon 97035 �,
SRI PROJECT 89034
� IoTovember 16, 1989 �''
I?'
S'
� � � �
� £{
�t 1
�
����
t:'
. . . . ' � . . . . .1f'
N I
I�
,
�;�
�
��f , .
�
�
1.0 INTR�►DUCT�ON AND APPROACI-�
� Scienti�c Resources, Inc., (SRI) was asked by the City of Tigard ta prepare
an identi�ication and assessment of wetlands within the City of Tigard city limits and
area of interest. The overall purpose of the study was to produce a f�road scale
1 treatment of the extent, location, and habitat value �of the wetland resources within
� the city and area of interest. The results of the study will be used in city-wide
plan�ng. �
, SRI began the work in July 1989, beginning with,a preliminary map�ing
effort to malcimize later field data and observation collection. E1s the area vcnthin
� the city limi�s and area of inYerest (h�reafter called the "Study A,rea") is quite large,
sufficient detail could not be portrayed on the City's standazd sanaller scale 1"=800
feet maps because of scale and physical size Inmitations. SRI identifi�d and
developed detailed "Study Area LTnit" maps which are at a scale and size rnore
""� Ppa�n�'ate for both reporting the necessary information and for better use in
� 1
� The data collection p�riod began in early August and cc�ntinuecl into early
November. Data and obs�etvations were collected ta sufficiently characterize the •
size and comp sition of each w�tland area and a Wetland 'Wildlife Hiabitat
Assessrnent(VVWI�iA.)was conducted for each wetland area/system identified. The
� maps, dat�, and WW��A forans are presented in Appendix,A.
� 2.0 DEFINITIONS
Wetlands are defined separately at the fed�ral level for various laws,
reg�alations, and programs. At the federal level, four agencies are involved with
� wetland identi�cation and delineation. The U.S. Arm �orps of Engineers (CE)
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA�, for adrninistering section
404 of the Clean Water Act, de�ne wetland as:
� 'Those areas that are inundated orsaturated by surface orgroundwater at a frequency
or duration sacfficient to support, ared that under normal circumstances do support, a
( prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. T�etlands
generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas."
� Tfie U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) uses a similar definition of
wetland but for identification purposes under the Food Security Act of 1985 �;
"Swampbuster" provision. 'I'he a�plication of the definition primarily targets
agricultural lands where farmer eligibility for thi�program's bene�ts are concerned:
� "Wetlands are defined as areus that have a predominarce of hydric soils and tha�are
rnundated or saturated 6y sruface orgroundwater at a frequency of duration sufficient to
I support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of hydrophytic
vegetation typicaUy adapted to life in saturated soil conditions, except larufs in Alaska
idertti,fied as having a high potential for agricultural development artd a predomin�arcce
� of pennafrost soils.„
ThP U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) conducts inventories of the
nation's wetlands and for that purpose de�nes wetland as:
�
I
,
�
"Wetlands are lands transitionral between terrestrral and aqc�atic systems where the
water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For
� purpose of this classification ["Classification of Wetdands and L)eepwater Habitats of
the United States" (Cowardiry et u� 1979)J, wetlunds must have one or more �f the
following three attributes: (1) at least perivdicalty, �he land supports predominantly
� hydrophyte�s, (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soi� and (3) the
substrate �s nonsoil and is saturate� w�th water or covered by shallow water at some
time during the growing serrson of each year."
� Like the CE, EPA, and SCS definitions, the FWS de�inition enaompasses
hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology, but expands the term wetland to
include shallow aquatic areas,where all three mandatory cnt�eria may not be visually
�vident,but are as�sumed to be presemt. Specifically, in freshwater systems the lower
M boundary of wetlanc�s, from terrestri,al to true aquatic habitats, is usually above
water de�ths of 6e6 fee� In summaryy a11 four agenc�es recogniz� that wetlands have
three pnmary components-- sufficient hydrolog�+ during the grovv�ng seas�n, a
� predominance of hydrophytic vege2ation,and hydnc soils.
C3n A�Yarch 20, 19�9 a new manual for identifying and d�lineating wetlands
� became the guid'uxg do�ument fnr ths four agencies in deterrnining jurisdictional
wetland (FTCWD 1989). The manual gives three sets of mandatory criteria for
identi�ng wetlands and suggests recnmmend�d methods f.or determirung wetland-
� uplan bounr�aries. The wetland identi�cation criteria are as fallow�:
T�etland i�egetatiora C.'riteria. �enerally, an �rea has h.ydre+phytic vegetati�n, and
therefare meets the wetla�d vcgetation criteria, when more than SO percent of the
� dominant species from all strata are classi�ied as wetland species. The FWS, in
cooperation vcRth the CE, �PA, az�d 5��, has �:ompilcd a list of plants (for Region 9
which includes Oregon) that are found in wetlands. Based on the frequency that a
r plant is usuall�► found in wetlan�ds, each sp�c��es was assigned an indicator status of
�� either facultative upland (FACU) if the lant is occasionally found in wetlan€�s (1-
33% estimated prc�bability), facultative (�AC) if e ually likely to nccur in upla�xds
or �etlands (34-66%), facultative wetland FACW� if the plant usually o�curs in
qwetlands �j67-9�% , or obligate wetland �OBL) if almost always occurring in
wetlands(>99%) �Reed 1988j.
� Hydric Soils Criteria. The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS)
has established criteria for idea►tifying soils that have developed certain
characteristics in response, over time, to saturated soil conditians sufficient to
� support the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Hydric soils are
soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing se�son
to develop ana�erobic conditions in the upper part (SCS 1987): All orgamc soils
(Histosols, except Folists) are hydric, as are minei•al soils in Aquic suborders, Aquic
� subgroups, Albolls suborder, Salarthids great group, or Pell great groups of
Vertisols that are: a) somewhat poorly drained and have a water table less than 0.5
feet from the surface for a week or more during the growing season; b) poorly
drained with a water table within 1.0 feet of the surface for a week or more during
� the growing season; or c) are very poorly drained with a water table less than 1.5
feet of the surface for a week or more during the growing season. Hydmc soils
include soils that are ponded (standing wa�er as a result of one event) for a period
� from at least 7 days to over one month during t�e growin�season and soils that are
frequently flooded (more than 50 percent chance of tlooding under normal or usual
weather conditions) from 7 days to over one monti,h during the growing season.
�
�
w
�
�
i�etl�nd Hydrolo�y C►iteria. An area has wetland hydrology when, if the soils are
� mineral soils, the soils are saturated to the surface during an average rainfall year
for a week or more during the growing season. In somewhat poorly drained soils,
the water table must be ab�ve 0.5 feet; in highly permeable, poorly drained or very
poorly drained soils, the water table is 1.0 feet or less from the surface; or in low
i permeability, ponrly cirained or very poorly drained soils, the water table must be
� within 1.5 feet of the surface to meet the criteria for wetland hydrology. Poorly
drained or very poorly drained organic soils meet the criteria if th� water table is
usually at a depth where saturatian occurs to th.e surface more than rarely. An a�ea
� also meets the cri.teria if it is ponded or frequently flooded with surface v✓�,ter for a
week or more during the growuig season.
� The three criteria, vegetation, soils, and hydrology, must be met if an area is
to be determined as wetland. A range of wetland indicators for each of the criteria,
collected indirectly from �erial photographs, published m�aps, and other literature,
or collected direc�ly in the field at a particular site, either satisfy the mandatory
criteria�nd the area is wetiand or fail the criter�a an.d the area is upland.
� �.0 1VIET�-I()I)S
Wetland Identifacataon and Delineation. 'I'he specific m�thods used to identafy and
� delineate wetlands in the inventory proc�ess for the City of Tigard closely follows the
recommended "Routiue Off-site" apprc�ach in the Federal Manual for ldentif�ing
and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands �FICWI) 1989). Comprehensiv�, an-field,
� three-parameter technical boundary determinations were not conducted and were
beynnd the scope e�f this work. Q.lthough t�e routine off-site appr�ach is a
recommended method in the new manual for the identi�ication and delineation of
tivetlands, we refer to tlie wetland areas identi€ied in this stud as "Potentially
� Regulated Wetland". '�'harefore, wetland boundaries identified (Yxs shown on the
enclosed maps) are only approximate. Triey are approximate because the method
its�lf relies heavily on a compilation of available aenal photagra�hy and mapped
data only (e.g., black and v�rhite, cc�lor and color mfrared aenal photography,
I U.S.D.A. Soil Conservatian Service Soil Survey Maps, a list of Hydric Soils for
Oregon, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/National Wetland Inventory maps, large-
� scale topographic aiaps, etc.), thereby indicating the presence of wetlands, but not
their exact boundaries. However, the method, and therefore the quality of the
wetland assessm�nt results, has been improved and strengthened by SRI site visits
which provided "ground truthing" for aerial photographs, veri�cation of wetland
I plant communities and species composition, drainage and drainage patterns, and
topography. Further, we have identi�ied same wetlands that are located in area5
mapped as non-hydric soil. Such areas were identified and mapped as wetland on
� the basis of our on-site inspectiuns where, in most cases, ob5ervations of a
dominance of hydrophytic vegetation and proximity to signi�cant hydrologic
features (and, hence, suf�icient water available for soil saturation) we re recorded.
� Under these conditions, and on a site specific basis, it is our opin��on that the
wetland soils criteria would likely be met. As site speci�c land development or
wetland conservation plans arise where definitive wetland boundaries are required
for regulatory purposes, additional site data collection may be needed. '�
� Identifying wetlands in the City of Tigard study area�uvas conducted in several Ii
phases. These phases included a review of color aenal photography, intensive study ;
' of detailed topographic sheets, identi�cation and compilation of both hydric soils �
only(see SAU descnptions, maps, and summary SAU data sheets) and all soil types
�
i,,.
i' . .. . ...... . . . .� . . . . ......_._ . . ,..,......._';..'
I
�I
� � .
. .
�
found in the Study Area(a set of summary soils data is provided in Table 1), review
� of 100-year floodplain maps, signi�cant natural resourees ( revious Goal 5 work),
parcel base/tax lots, and topographic quaxter-section m�aps �l inch = 100 feet), and
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapso All other known mapped data was
acquired.
s�:7 Study Area Unit (SAU) base m.aps were developed to provide su�icient
detail for v✓etland areas identi�ed (see Appendix A). 'The 6/30/89 Parcel Ba�e for
M the City of Tigardy scaled to 1" = 400 feet, was used as a base xixap for the study
because af the ease of locatin streams and wetland areas b�th on the map and in
�
the feld and also because of e significance of wetland areas to adjacent praperty
owners. The overall study area was divided in.to seven SAU's: A, B, C, D, B, F, and
� G. An attempt was made to keep nei�hborhoods intact therefore the maps were
divided at signi�cant roadways and railways where possible, a.nd always along
proPerty boundanes. The fallowing information has been plotted as overlays to the
�- base maps:
1. 100-year flaodplain bounda�ries. .
� 2. �-iydric soilse
3. USFWS NVVI wetlands.
4. Po�entially Regul�ted Wetlands.
5. Potentially Regulat�d W�tiands plotted over a black and white aerial
�I � photo�raph bas�.
The�ity of Tigard provided a color aerial photograph, at app�oxiznately 1" _
� 700', of the entire study area on which clear acetat�overlays were used to draft
hydric soils,floadplain, and NWI boundaries. An intensive study af the detail�d
topagraphy of each of the SAU's provided clues to potential wetlands. Stream
channels,depressional areas, and pands(where indicatedj were rnarked for further
r �eld study. Sozne areas of�otential wetland identi�ed on the topographic sheets
either post dated the NWI anfc�rmatian or were simply not mapped rn that effort.
� Based on the de�ree of overlap betwe�en�rimarily topography and hydric
soils,but also with relation to NWI and floodplain boundari�s,an appcoxiaaiate
wetland area was outlined on working field anaps. These areas, roughly outlined,
� provided the starting point for on-site inspections. SRI began the�eld work portion
of the study both concunent with and sut�se uent to the map ing phase(s): In
addition to collecting dat,a for ianput to th�V��analysis, �e1d observatians were
� made on weather conditions,topography, drainage,vegetation communit�
cornposition and species dominance, and human activrties. The boundanes of each
potent�ally re�ulated wetland were then re�ined using the site speci�c observations
made. Po�entially regulated wetland boundaries identified in the�eld were marked
� on acetate overlays of 12 April 1989 black and white aerial photo�raphic stereopairs
to clearly indicate the boundaries. These identi�ed wetlands were then tr.ansferred
to the study area maps and to the larger parcel base map, scaled at 1" = 800',which
� includes the entire study area.
Wetland �Idlife Habitat Assessment. A Wetland Wildlife Hal�itat Assessment
(WWHA� was conducted. Qualitative descriptions for comparison purposes were
� made of each wetlan�d area. 'The analysis was generally restricted to individual
wetland areas, but where large, continuous wetland systems were encountered, such
as occurs along Summer Creek in the western portion of the City and along Fanno
� Creek, these areas were subdivided at points at which si�nificant changes in habitat
were found. These "break points"are,generally,where eith�r the natural vegetation
�
�w.. . .. . . . . � .. . ..� - .. . � � .
� �ti. �'�_
�
community changes significantly (c.�., from a forested wetland to an agricultura.�
�eld) or where a ma�or roadway ar mther human developm�nt segments the
� dvetland.
There are twa parts to the W@VHA methodology 1) a narra.iive description
of the site; and 2) a numerical rating of various wildlife habit�t parameters. The
'v n h f r wildlife.
i in as�s of the method is ta ident the tential � e site as o wi
� g� d g b �y. . g�
The system focuses on the fact that wildr�has three basic requirements £ar
� survival--water, food, and cover. A sketch map of each V�✓WHA area was drawn in
the field and a host of habitat and wildlife observations were mad� on standazd
V�JWHA forms (developed by SRI with the assistance of Mike Houek, Portland
Audubon Socie�; Ralph Rogers, U.S. EPA; Iaennis� Peters and Diana Hw�ng, U.S.
Fish and Wildli e Sezvice; Gene Herb, Ore on Department of F�sh and Wildlife;
� r
and Esther Lev,Consulting Wildlife Biologist�. 'These observatians include:
� 1. A description of the locatian of WWkIA unit.
2. E�n approximatio�of the size of the V�JWI-�A umit. .
� 3. Comm�nts regarding the reasonin�behind speci�ic numeric ratings or
fmr potential of the sate for re.liabilatatinn.
� 4. Seasonality of water features, t�permaneiit wa�ter source may provide
habitat for a certain type of wildli€e on a year-round basis, while a
more seasonal source may coincid� �rnth shifts in wildlife usage,
, community str►YCture,etc.
S. Visual observati�n of water quality. Very slow moving water or
stagnant water generally is not considered as having as Yugh a value as
� water that is coniinually flushed through a system. From a wildlife
habitat standpoint, moving water is usually z�ot deficient of dissolved
axygen--a condition which can severely limit species diversity.
� 6. Proximity of water to cover. Distances from a water source to wildlifc
cover has predation impiica:tions for certain species as esca�e routes
� may becorne limited, and cover adjacent to water is often climatically
anoderated by the presence of a wat�r body.
7. Water type diversity. Some species prefer differing ty�es of aquatic
habitats, be they ponds, streams, or forested ar emergcnt wetlands.
� The more diversity in water types a site has, the more species diversity
can be expected.
� 8. Wildlife food variety. The greates the variety of food, the greater the
potential for meeting thee requirements of more wildlife species.
� 9. Wildlife food quantity. Although the volurne of food available may
not necessarily mean a greater diversity of wildlife at a particular site,
more food does generally mean that more individuaL� vv�thin a giv�n
� species,or group of species, may be supported.
10. Wildlife food seasonality is a measure of food oa a year-round basis.
� Habitats that can support wildlife throughout the Year are often more
valuable than habitats only used on a seasona�l basis.
�
E, ,
.�
___ _ I
l .
l
11. Structural diversity af cover. Vertical strati�.ca.tion of vegetation(e.g.,
� multi-layered systems with a ground layer of herbaceous cover,
intermediate strata of shrubs, and an overlying canopy of saplings
and/or trees) facilitates a stronger basis for support for a greater
variety of species than a less structurally diverse system.
i
12. The variety of cover types is important to wildlife from an
escapement,foraging, an.d reproduction standpoint. An area ha�►ing a
, v�ride variety nf species im�ortant as wildlife cover (e.g., ash overstc�ay,
alder,willow, and spirea mtermediate canopy, and a soft nash/slough
sed�e ground cover) will be more v�luabl� than an are� having a
� singie cover type(e.g., a monoculture of reed canary-grass)•
13. Seasonality of c�ver types. As with water and food seasonality, a
habitat cover type will have more importance to wildlife if that cover
� is present �+eaP-round. Seasonality of co�ter types is determined
primarily on the basis of the pereentage of �vergreen species versus .
coniferous species.
� ivotes were also taken on human and ot�er physicai disturbances which
included such factors as relative sealusion fre�m or praximity to housin$, traffic,
and/or commercial or industrial activities. Remov�l caf the physical cc>mponents of
� habitat(water, food, caver)were al$o included.
The individu�l scores am�ng the various habikat components, were summed
, to arrive at a �nal score for a given site. Depending on the �nal site score, a class
was assigned to the site wiith classes�re�resentmg a predeterminedl ra�nge of habitat ;
quality. The classes, frc�m I through 1V, in decreasing order of laabitat quality (class ;
� I is highest, class IV is lowest) are de�ned as:
Class I 76-96 High value)
Class II 59-75 Mod. high value)
, Class II 34-58 Mod. low►value)
Ciass IV 0-33 Low value)
, The WVVI-IA rating system is intended as an assessment of the relative value of
� wetland for wildlife habitat. It is not inter�ded to provide a comprehensive
environmental or functional analysis of each site.
�
4.0 STLJDY AREA IUNIT DESCRIPTIONS
� Study Area Unit A. This SAU is bounded by Scholls Ferry Road on the north ,,
beginiung at its junctian with Old Scholls Ferry Road on the vvest extending ;
northeastward to 121st Aven:ue. From this jun.ction at 121st Avenue, the eastern
� boundary runs south to North Dakota Street and jogs east to a point�in line witk�
115th Street and then due souCh to Fonner Street, following Fonner to 121st again.
(7n 121st, at approximately the junction with Howard Drive, the southern boundary
begins and runs due west along property Pines to the limit of the study area.
�
The topo�raphic gradients of SAU A are most severe oa the south near the j
base of the slopes fornung Bull Mountain. This area is relatively steep and
� dissected, with five primary stream valYeys contributing run�off to the northern
;
t,
,
� �,
_„� __,
� .
�
portion of the SAU endin� at their confluence with Summer Creek in the north.
The extreme western. p�ortion of the area is low-relief, rolling hills dominated by
� agricultural land. Itesidential areas are doirun.ant in basically the eastem ane-half
of the area,wi�th several such developments underway.
� The lowest hydrolo�ic level in the SAL1 is Summier Creek� Summer Creek is,
gen�rally, a vesy low gradient stream and is a tributary to Fanno Creek to the east.
Although large portions of the creek margins have been altered dae to residential
' development and the �lacement af sewer lines, a large near-natural ripariar� a�nd
wetland comidor remain in the lower reach�s. Summer Lake,a large pond modifiied
fro� a pre-existin� series ofpo nds and wetiands by devel�pment activities, �s a
domina,nt�ydrologic feature of the uni�. This is a shallow body of water surrounded
� by residential development on the north and apen grassy park areas(and additional
deaelopment in-progress) on the south. A low concrete dam impounds streamflow
to form the lake. The brdad floociplain extends eastward from the lake to 121st
� Avenue. Just west of 121st,another set af two s�maller ponds exist.
Four hydric soil seri�s have been identi�ed in the SA.0 (SCS 1987) (see
� summary da.t�x sheets in �.ppendix A). In decreasing order of dami.nan.c� (ar�al '
coverage), these are: VVapato silty clay loam (mapping unit 43), D�lena siit loaan
(16G�, C�ve silty clay loam (13), and Cove clay (14). 'Y'he Summ�r �reelc drainage
is dominated in ats upper(southern) tributaxies by Delena silt loa�m. 'These soi�are
� poorly d�ained,wet, orgartic Inceptisdls lim�ited to stream courses. Hawe�►er, a large
area of the extreme western segment of the SAU is dozninated also by I�elena soils--
an area largely used for agricultural purFoses, 11ae middle sections�f the trzb�taries
to Summer Creek, as well as the upper reaches of the creek are dominantly Wapato
' silty clay loam. These ar� poorly drained, very wet, dark c�lored Molli.sals that hav�
developed in flood plains throu�haut the county. Scattered areas of poorly drained
Cove clay soils are found also m the middle tributary r�ea�hes. These soils have a
�, 1 vety high content of "shrink-swell" clays-- expan�ive when w►et and d�veloping large
surface cracks to a significant depth when dry. Most common in the lower segments
of Summer Creek is Cove silty cl�y, a poorly drained, wet, finely textured Mollisol
� with a high content of shrink-svvell clays, but not as high as the Cove clay. In
summary, much of the Summer Creek drainage has hydric soils, but these are
generally limited to floodplains.
' 3tudy Area Unit B. The northern boundary of this unit is com osed of Scholls Fer
Road, Hall Boulevard, and Oleson Road. The eastern boundary begins a�n the
� north at the junction of Washington I�rive and Taylors Ferry Road, south on
Washington to Ha11 Blvd. to Hwy. 217. The southern boundary follows Hwy. 217 to
the grade of the old r�ilroad near its crossing of 9Sth Avenue, continuing southwest
' along the railroad grade to Ti�deman Road. The baundary follows Tiedeman to the
property line north of Fowler Junior High School,theri west to the limit of SAU A.
� The topography of this unit can be described as low gradient, rolling hill and
swales,with the dominant topographi�feature being the relatively broad floodplain
and somewhat incised channel of Fanno Creek. Fanno Creek and Ash Creek are
the two major tributary streams crossing the unit.
l'I Cove silty clay loam, Wapato silty clay loam, Huberly silt loam, and Verboort
silty clay loam, are the h�+dnc soil senes in the unit. The characteristics of the Cove �
� and Wapato series are d�scussed above. Huberly silt loam are poorly drained Typic ',
' Fragiaquepts that have developed on stream tenaces. This soil is not on the �
� �
I'
�
� National list of h dric soils nor is it on the t e 1' f h
y S at �st o ydnc soils. �ut the so�l Ys
listed as "hydric" on the more s�eci�c Washin�ton County list of h}rdric soils and, '
� therefore,for the purpases�f th�s study,is considered as such. These are Inceptisols I
with an aquic moisture re,gime, having also a slightly cemented hardpan between 25-
38 in�hes depth. The hardpan layer is about 4 inches thick and is slightly
� impermeable to water.
Verboort soils are poorly drained also, but are Typ ic Argialbolls that have
formed in the lowest "b�ttomlands". These are Mollisols that have a high clay
� content in. the surface horizons (argillic layer), and that are extremely dark colored
(almast black), with a low chroma (dark colored) albic horizon immediately over
the clay laycr. The implications of th� argillic layer to wefiland determinat�ons is
� that the clays tend to perch runoff above them and also �vill retain runoff (aaid
there£c�re ereate conditions for anaerobiosis)well intG the growing season.
The distribution of the hXdric soils � SAU B is primarily r�stricted to
drainageways and floodpla,ins. Mu�ch of the area of the hydric soils in the unit has
been flled by residential and commercial developments. The lar�est singl� tract o£ .
� undeveloped hydric soil i�a a flQOdpla.in that xeYnains is loe�ted ad�acent to Hwy 217 '
just east of Greenburg Road �nd south of Oak Street. During the summer af 1989,
hovvever, most of this �.rea has been covered by fill �aterial in anticipat�on of a
development project and two small mi�igation ponds w�re created �see SAU B dat�,
� in appendix).
, Study Arr�ea Unit C. Occupying the nartheastern corner�f the Study A.rea, SAU C is
bounded by Taylars Ferry Road on t�� nnrth, on the east b�y the Willamette
Meridian (Multnomah and Washington �Coun�ty line), �-Iaines Road and Hwy. 99 on
the sou.th. The boundary continues southwest aiong Hwy. 9� to the Southern Pacific
t Railroad grade to K�therine 5treet (which parallels the property lines on an
extension east of the southern limit to SAU 1B). .
� The topographic character of the unit is besi described as rolling, low hills
with low narrow swales and stream courses betw�en them. As2� Creek domanates
the hydrologic features of the unit, with only two other significant draina es
apparent on the large-scale topographic sheets. The trend in slope(and drainage�is
, generally fcom northeast to southwest.
Cove silty clay loam, Huberly silt loam, Verboo�t sil�y clay loam, and Wapato
, silty cla� loam are the hydric soils found in SAU C. The �1'erboort series dc�mmate
the drainage of Ash Creek, while the Wapata series underlies the tributary that
merges Ash Creek from the east near Metzger Park. Cove silty �lay loam is
� domunant in a broad band under a small tributary to Ash Creek which roughly
parallels Hwy.217 on the southern margin of the unit.
� Study Area Unit 1D. SAU D abuts SAU A to the north and has as its eastern
boundary the same north-south extension in line with 115th Street. The southem
and western boundaries are de�ined by the City limit and area of interest
� boundaries.
I
Bull Mountain and its associated foa�thills stand out as the most significant
topographic feature of this Study Unit. Indeed, the mountain dominates the
' topographic fea,tures of the entire Study Are�. Rising to an elevation of slightly over
��
Il
�
� 700 feet msl stee slo es radiate outward from th� crest in all directions. Onl
� )y P P Y
� very sma].1 and narrow stream courses have developed as a result of the steep slapes,
anci no hydric soils oc�ur in SAU D.
� Study Area Un6t E. This SAU abuts SAU B and C to the north, and SAU A and D
' on the vvest. The ea.Stem boundary is the Willam�tte Meridia�n, and the southern
boundary is Bonita Road and Murdock Street.
, , Topographically, SAU E �s the most coanplex within the Study Area. The
highest elevation �s rcached at the hill-crest immedtately east of the low pass aloug
Hvcry. 99 just north of King City. 'Th� siope gradient trends from Llus maximum
� elevation of over 40A feet generally north-northeast and east-northeast to the Fanno
Creek floodplain (at or near 14Q to 15U feet) tha� a.rallels the Southem Pacific
c
Railroad line near the downt4wn sector. The Fanno reelc floodplain is narrower at
the northern margins of SAU E and becomes signi�cantly broader approa�ching the
� southeastem portion of the unit. Within this unit Summ�r �reek enters �anno
Creek on the north. Minor streams drain into Fanno Creek from the southwest near
�W Tiedeman and Walnut Streets, and near$W Bura�►am and Main�treets. iZed '
� Rock Creek is also tributary to Fanciv Creek, b�t th� ere�k stems fr�m the western
slopes of Mt. Sylvania draining wesiward entering Fanno Creek immediatel� south
aF the railroad grade (approximately 1/4 mile south of Hunziker Road) and east of
� SW Hall Blvd.
Four Hydric soil series are found in SAU E. Cove silty clay loam occupies
� and dominates the drainages in the northvvestern sectors of tbe unit, while Huberly
silt loam and Verboort silty elay loam dominate the areas af hydric soil in the east
and southeast. In contras� to the distribution of Cove soils which are restricted to
drainageways, the Huberly and Verboort series are relatively widespread and are
I nnt solely limited to existing stream courses, but also are faund in broad
depressional areas.
� Study Area Unit F. '�'h� southern boundary of SAU F is the Tualatin River,
b�ginning at the point where Hwy. 99 crosses the river. The western boundary is
Hwy. 99, the eastern limit is 8Sth Avenue, and the northern is Murdock Street.
' Slopes within this unit are primarily south-facing, grading toward the
Tualatin River in a slightly concave form. Slopes in the extreme northeastern ;
I corner, �owever, trend toward the Fanno Creek drainage. The major drainage
network within the unit is tributary to the Tualatin near CW 113th Street. The
southern arm of this dendritic drai�age is, in part, a relict flood chanael of the
Tualatin River. The depression now functians as an active tributazy stream chaauiel.
' Three smaller creeks drain into the larger stream just north of the c�nfluence with '
the Tualatin.
� As a result of saturated conditions over time within this network of surface
water, hydrie soils have developed. Verboort silty clay loam dominates within the
drainage network on the south, and is restricted ta the area immediately adjacent to
L the stream channels. A minor area of Huberly silt loam oc�upies one arm of this
network. Large areas of hydric soils exist in the eastern an northeastem quadrants
of'the unit, composed mainly of Hubcrly silt loam and with minor areas of Cove silty
clay loam and Dayton silt loarn (see Table 1 for ma�or characteristics of the Dayton
�
� ;:
i ;:
�
�
J
series). In the extreme southeast corner of SAU F, Cove clay and Wapato silty clay
� loam are the two hydric soil series that are faund.
Study Area Unit iG. SAU G also has as its eastern boundary the Willannette
� Mendian, but the boundary follows Interstate 5 where the Nieridian and the freeway
join. The southern boundaay i� deGned by the city limits, aund the remaiziing
periphery of SAU G�buts SAi1 F and E.
� The Fanaxo Creek tloodpla.in dominates the topographic features of this unit.
� All siopes within the unit direct surface and groundwater flow towards th� creek.
Within the unit, Fan�o Creek flows thraugh an incised channel both as a result of
� natural processes anti human activities. It is of interest and si�ni�ica:nc� to wetland
� det�rmination that very little area of hydric soil occurs in associa+ion with the creek.
The only bydric soil that is faund adJ°�,cent to Fanno Creek here is Wapato silty clay
.� loam. The area�anderlair�by the soil is located near the extreme northerni margin of '
the unit. Huberly silt loam oceurs along a minor tributary in the northeast and
across a broader ar�a immediately no.rth of the junction of SW Carmen Drive and
72nd Avenue. •
5.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION�
Althou,gh it is apparent that a significant amount of wetland areas have been
lost due to development, the City of Tigar•d, within the cit� limits and the its area of
interest, has a considerable wetland resource base r�emaimng. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service under the National Wetland Inventory (I�1WI) program developed
maps of wetlands in the Study Area based on 1981 color infra�ed aerial
photography. Generally, riv�rine (creeks and streams), emergent (swamps,
marshes), and forested wetlands were identi�ed in the NWI f�r the Study Area.
Although extensxve "�r�und truthing" of photography is part of the methodology
used by the USFWS in identifying wetlands under the program, the NVVVT does not
exteaasively address, however, the occurrence of site-specif� wetland hydrolo�y
(other than streanns or ponded areas recc>gnizable fronn the phot�s) or hydric soils
in association with identi�ed wetlands. Wetland hydrology and hydric soils are
mandatory criteria for identifying wetlanc�s as per the new Federal Mareual for
Identifying and Delineatutg Junsdictional Wetlands (1989), and therefore some
wetland areas identi�ied on the NWI maps for the Study .Area do not refl�ct
accurately wetlands in the Study Area that may be subject to Federal or State
jurisdiction.
Using the Routine Off-site �te�hod as recomrnended by the new manual, �n
conjunction with site visits, we have identified as wetland only those areas having
hydric soils (as identi�ed by the SC5 soil survey), a dominance of hydr�phytic
vegetation (based on calor and color infrared photography, and on visual
observations and identi�cations of species), and wetland hydrology (based on
detailed topographic maps, visual observations, and vegetation composition). As a
reseclt, we have identified a total of 117 individual wetlands totaling a,pproximately 324
acres of potentaa[ly regulated jurisdictional wetland within the city ldmits and urea of
interest. SA� E has the highest number of indivi�ival wetlands at 34,while SAU G
has only 14. These numbers are, in part, a function of the size of the SAU, but the
actual wetland density is area speci�c.
;
� ' t� �,.
�
�
The dis�tribution of w�tlands in the City of Tigazd and its azea of interest is
� most clasely associated with the existxng surface drainage pattern. Fanna Creek is '
the douiinant strsa� system It follows a north to south flowing cours� frona its
headwaters in the West Hills to its mouth �t the 'I'ualatin River and'is fed by two �,
major tributaries (Ash Creek, flowing from the northeast and Summer Creek,which '
� flows from the west). Wetlands aion� Fanno Creek and its anajor tributaries are
relatively long and narrow and are limuted to the floodplain by tapo aphic features
(eag., terraces and levies and nther sharp changes in slopesgradient� Several small
wetlands areas are�ocated a�long tiiree minor tributaries of Fanno Creek. One small
� st�eam ttovvs soutli directly into the Tualatui River along the southera border of t11e '
study area. The mos�extenside potentially re�ulated wetland is located in a lovvly�' g
area of agrlcultural land dominated b� hydnc soils in tlie northea�t portion of the
� study area (SAU A) and is not associated with any floodplain. Wheare Hwy. 217
crosses Ash Cre�k and Ited Itock Creelc,several relatively large wetlands have been
extended and enhanced with ponds. 'The Tualatin River floodplain, at Cook Park,
has cont�ibuted to the formation of several wetland areas also.
A total of 72 Wetland Wildlife Habitat .�.ssessment (WWHA) areas wea�e
' identified. Th�se units comprise w�tlands that are similar in terms of visually �
contiguous habitat types. In terms of Wi?VHA scores, patterns of scores �d classes
of the various wetlands in the Study Area emerge. 'I'he highest mean `VVWHA
scores are found for those areas in SAU E a�d G. Likewise, the lowest (highest
, Walue) mean class scores are also found in SAU E and G. C�+nversely, the lowest
mean WWHA scores are for the wetlands in SAU F and B, which also corresponds
to the lowest mean class scores for those same SAU's. It i� useful to contrast these
, results with the percentage, in each SAU,of class I and II wetlands per total number
of wetlands identified within each SAU. Of the four classes of wetland �abitat
quality (VVWHA classes), 5 class I wetlands were found, 29 cl�ss II, 25 class III, and
13 class Id wetlands. Although the mean wedand scores in SAU A did not rank as
� high as for SAU E or G, 60 �ercent of the wetiands identified were class I or II.
SAU F wetlands, hawever, did have among the lowest mean scores and only 9.5
percent of the wetlands here are class I or II.
� �
'
' .
'
�
�
�
'
� �.
EXAMPLE OF A WETLAND AREA
2�-10
_ ;
�t `��.__
C w.l, _ �� � r "7 �^ ,I" >� � . r y�I� � •; ' / � C.l�1 � ""(1' 1 � _,
/ : '�6'rr�'%� 'r;, h f. ' � ..�fu/�' � -./� )/ , o-�fi � y�� �
.1 • � S�r t B X� � 1 t�r• � / "I'.// "
` ii� .� :. 5,:.}�; y� j», ���,}��. � { r 1-. 'F,o 1 � �� I ( � ( �� /*,�{e .��---t' �7
,��. ,� G; ��� ,, ( .� �� �� �X �� �i�K� � _' :-,,,,�.1 �r r�.
( . '` t�J f,l. ��}� �� .r�l� �I E �« � Y x:� ti ) w
C��� '✓�?2 la_ .l '��'�fe� �, �f f �:f�"I�•r� ' �{�e� r� ♦� , `„� < � ` � �. . .�
' r � '
L. -^_-' �1 �� H 11�f_ � 1 �•� �
l��C ,.�...:?sl-S�'---�1._ �l �. t Q r 1 °�� -�f'j' �'' v� � ��r
� / � 11 � � � V y(,;�i.{�„� 3..
�.�L; 1� �� -.1�� _ � '�;;� �' �� �, � , i j;f 'r �.
, .. � � � �. � � 3 '',; �� �f
if �.♦- � �! �i� ) i� . `�� � �!.:�1��. I�� Pry Ru1n� � �: �v ��m�ffih- �' i�..�n�.f .�-.�'4�a "�� �
h \ �y L d '� �� ��- � �fl �: _�"rt'r°���� g t•'.
��� �)��. `.-..J 1��. ' �-'.�'� �I�; � t.�, i i �.� Y I� .. �� -� r
�� � ��:� � .� i ����y 1:. �sF �1..�' j� ,e: 1 L�CS� /! : { _ ���
� �i r }�f (� � \�� .� ;;��, ..� �a � � ,__,_y, . �t�.� i I .yf!-,�.. ty�
-�� ` . '� �.�' ... . -\ +c.'t � �� ! ���q�r• ��v. yY'� . ,,J
� "Q�.�'��� .....-�� \� ��!� "A"^" �..1�. . �•:`''�. �1� " :�'nKlr i .. g��
"�'�"'�.-!_ , �� �'_""-��:� y ' � � . `� � � ��( .Y t• � � :1.5 �'IlxitW � �
� ��� � � �} �` 73 _ _•� M i ts' ..t f"'?��`7� 1��55 j�i�d�e '"4� � �
i � .��.i� � � ��.y�vt
C'..:..��'� /�� _ / •' 1 .. �.�i,.�:„•5�.. ...� ' . „� ` .•��^ V< � ,i,�T+�.' t ..
"'l �`� i f ':� ��_{�..\ ,• }k. �� � L U � ,
'� J�!i 7 i. 1 r� �.� /�� j ( %1 �. �"�.�d?-�t,'� y�i�� � t [ �.y� t�•��-�' � (,rt''� � .
-d�` ,i . i �,� 1��� a ` � r .. �' _ ,_ � n
...• -f' .•.y . ��,.
_�:�_ ..� .��.. � � a� �a i r= .�
� . . .
F
0 . . .
+
. rj,' . '� ':f y ^}: ( � . .`�l.• �."��.. t'� 39 I1;'l s �
. . . . � •.`f. /,•. ! �..
� ��^ . .. � w . 5 .
, . , i- .�� . '•� ��
. � . ..,.
. /".. a A
_ , w.-'�
�. `✓�.r ti; � ati -�c�F- � ia .'`y+..�; l,� t �t
'i_ :� � n• r::' �� _ � • � �' .. e u
V � �/3 3�.i �. � ��r . � �,c u ��,� "4R. �t4 �� ��r : i �.
- ..: .. ti . } ;.�v� �� �.�. ��T � �r�1 n��' .� '.M !I `�
-• . ..�j'- � �� � �( `^�+1��11�a! �. MH�
�atra��w��. / / �,•� 'a f � 1 ✓i'��'! • •
�.. � `...��A �_.
''1 � + . � 'i�.'�,., •`�,��arµ~� �Ll ' r 1��r..R�F .��,�+'-7� r.,a'�t,k�R� ':� �✓ ' ,j' .� R ,
��� .� i / i,�.,
\' H 4 �� �� �l� � , • ���r �l..Y ,� , ` _ \'♦ ♦ � rt �r '
� �. ; i� ��y � �"� •�r rYr rii.' ` i�..! �> 1 3 J��� �' Y ,�7� •'�JI��"�. � l�,` ,, ..'r
. ■ � 1./. Y ` �'7_J. � .J+"l i,./ � I i .. �V j t �\ �AlSY foP :l..L �.-�\ _t _�� .
�� I / � {�� ' � �M'h'! � t � r'�`asl/ j�' i. i . .' y _,� '..K r n�.
' ' � ,! � . . 1�y�v�, � � . .. �'"`� �/��1"�», Y s 1 � . r � � °�. _
� � . . ._F `•(x`5'd-t '��t �.�a �*•� ,]'r II� � r¢ '�`�a'�.� .:.�'{��q�w .
: i; �qYil�.�Mor.an •) �� � '`��t,,2. .i;�'rf �r1.s . . � � {1'
r � ' � a i!: i m r" �"1 J
7.._ .�'� cu r��4•...:� � i^i ♦ _� � ' _. .
r *:. e i
. 'Q . . - , � � r ''''� y. -.�3 :. ° � ��t, `.� ���y � . . .RL , ''� '. '
// + � � �? �//�J j+\ �Ij �� r'�L ._.jap°t r'� :�l`�M�
\ � � ��r�a��l�wwi'.' './,.: (�.. . �� ✓/� ' �\ � . i .l . Jr' .y ,� ...
� . �� i f _ , �t � �� i _,t` �.r. �r''r�^-^.•.'���.� � Z
• �::.. �.+ / +/\ : ..I _ ���. ^� �...i� r 1 �
� � -. ✓ � 1 � f - Z� �. �t'Fr'� �1�
" � , '�,��J._. �T o� �, �.� . . • l �t � 12. '�+1.Y y�
� � ' "� _ .M ,,,�f.y `.�.��.� U j3� . � .::. ( ��...:
, . � � 'L���` �`�: ..��"��,.,` ��., ,', '. ,�. �:� i 'z �...�. ` � '\. �,,. ,
_' ' -�. _�.,i•,`Ty . • kr'S��'F. - lr� � _� j` .~ ��� � �:. _• g J� �d,�.
• � "� 4 ."� . �. ] � G . l
� it�' . R f ` � �.. � ' � ,� �,
• s ' a+ ;f�• ��cy ti .�. J ,� .. ���r
.+' . • �(�'�'i ./t�4'^-- i7-�'_ � .� �`*��'' �� ---� <Wi.. f ��"` �� �i ..� �� 1 '
.. .. . ,�.,�'—�•�"` it.. ilill �� y� t[.• �� n r�.�� _ �w°�p ' i* � �E
.. , ; - .+..-•�•S � •A..' .;G++�'""1`!�!�"''"'qqy;, Gv� �..��i�. � �� ,.1 ..,;
J l T�'
Ir: ��{sE�..�;,.% �i�-!�.�.�: IS � � ��7..� r =. � .�y �,� ry � �;1.e .
,if•�- , \ . c".�'�`-_�,� ,.� � ,, .� ��" t .� � ' �t�.i�
of __ a .� . � ..� �� �. � 1- �`. ... '�� .'+' rA�m��R�:.^rj`/ `a'`� y^ .
•. 't._ .y�� .,� . ♦r
. �
CITY OF TIGARD
Wetland Inventory and �sse�sment: �
Study Arc;a Ljni�s
2�
��
�
� �
(':�
City of Tigard _
V�IEETLANIJ TNVENTORY AND ASSESSI'►�I�NT
;� +� , � o , �b -. . .,: l/� �/
� �
.. -�e� �`,. _ ,*•`=� -� � � � �r1- ,. /�. � .
,`.; ,n �ll.� ,�7, .� � � ,� ' y _ f�s �
�; � ;,.. .e 'r,�'.� �e�, •" u , .� ; _ / _
� �c��"" � =.r �" . � �
� 1`, � ,.., � ;�,: r �.
k � ' �' r 1' ��� �. ' �'�
'�. �� �--�t t�� ' .�y./ 3X.A� r.-
� _ �- � t �.�. �,'• (� .y � �
� , t
J�1� �l..J��� . ' .� n r f`aa'{S' , .�t� � �.t.
i' ..1�4 1 �, � � .\ 4' y� 5 . : ��1.
_ '^•' s_i t� Z � ���'.i .
� T • f
� t � � L�1 � � ��, -t �1 i F rl
y •ll i ,� y
''" •' � /� .'�1. �4...� � f :f\'� � t� . � 1 M1 ' ` � .
/. l :�'� �'• � �. , x�i�t �jy. ,� � .,
(��� �/} -''� �1� �� .`�- `'�� � +���:, ,' ,f '� � .
�! .� t� .,� _ .�T��.:' . � .^T
. � /. �� .fy � • :, � � �:R :y—' ; '� T ~5 LFtij ....
;ti� _ '' '� • �. � � ��� 1!
r� � � _.. e � ...t � : ?2�� `. �� � I
�.,-i i . .� ( i � . ��'j,� 4.,y ♦ ��r •t♦ i��ii �
., }a��� �I .r( I-. • w �,.. � • �. E
C_..> � : ,�� ..�5 ` � - ��) �.l � �: � • !�'�!,t����¢ � . » '�.= ..: . ;
1 _c" i :•!� .r � ��i/ y��i%Y&�[��' .•�'
.. � .. / . �� i � ,,� i 1 / � :d`� E�1 'y''�.''. ��. �5.��y� . �`' � �.,ari ���� f
�-��`'`�''" � �K �� � ' �
� � � � : �-...�� h `� �(� .`� L �',t�.��l�F ��t((4'x f'i�.��"-{� f'�� l�� � ���w
� .} � � g..u..M ��i a i 4.,NyHt a .1� � a� . .
. / r' -r '+./` � ' ' i v . '* �
t� ,�,� 1. \ r . �r . 7 3,. .h
•t:. '_�"r 'V .
0' t � � � ':wA"�` �. I�"{�'.�^. .�.�� �'� Il.�, . � �� � `
A
i i: k �;
.��� w � . 1 r .
�, � j7 j � ., � ' � ` , ._� ...
�� {�.� � � •�1 � .�r�2Y:_,�L'u:� t � i�' `
. ,, Q��, �l • . •�,y.m :;�-,�..,e' �c, ��
i `/ .1 S .� I ,,r_ �- d'j j. ' _ ' � � �;j{' �
' 'r , , t. � , � cE '��, ��,ar . J i`' :.�. � f 'i I�- �
. � �\
. 7„H_ � .i � ��-i�r•v~t��It�� � 1 f�.=+. .i.�:�x:�� ;i,,'' t�- � '�(,. .hi •� ��.. . � � c�-.
4},9 � - ti
� � �:�1�' 1 : y i. �
r(' '� �: r.- �.. j
�. .� � ?�� � i 1 i� 'Itl � k -� �e. _ .ii( ✓ �,�[" *w. 1 �N+
r
� • ',rc��1J�. �`ti.',�"" ,+r i..�`✓.�''"31J�"� t '�'1, � 9 �.
. �j�" e,.. • � ' .
�/ , ,� � L ,�, x:
•,� � .l.. ' , . �•.,�::.,�+�•�!+ ••i' . • � `�""�'� ��� , !1
. ' � ��.''�.�
. � � . . � 'i�.
yl
�
�::
.. . . . . � f...;
I+'
�.,
1;'.
. .. � �� :�.�l-��:.:
�:�
� . . .. ... . �4
�. . . � . � �... �:.
�.., . .. . . �.�
��-
. .. , . . .`I`
y
� . � � ��i".i
. � . . . . . . . tt�
�:�
r
�m+.�... . . . . . . .. �� .. � _.,... ..:�.. . . . . . . � � . :�
� � � • � •
, . � � - � . - �
,,�' • •
�����II►� . .
����� ; �
.��
�111M�.��I - ,�,r �►
\, // � � ■���� �/ � �
�I � � ■ � � r���' �
�r�_ � D �
/ .. � ► � ��
.���� ����� ������ ��r� . „�r t�� �r
. � •� � . � �"'� ♦
. � � ► �
_ . � �• � ■ ,�. . _ . •
a � ,, ■ '� � . i 1: . ..► '� �
�,�� r r/.�i � � .� r�'�
••�pr�� � � � ��r ,, ■ !•�'�' ,..
�� ■ �t � .. � - , ��
.� rrr ■ . • • �!e►�►
�. . ,�.�'' � .. . i �,' , : . . . '�'„I ,
� .; •, �. ��,, �'� � � . � • '.
� ��� � �� �� . � � � � ��
,�/ �I, � ��
.E �► � � � � .�
: � . ,, � 1� ., � � ;.
• �`"� � � �� . ..
� w � �'� . t ,
. . ■ r ��►, ■
��� � �
. � �
■ • . _ �, ■
? ■ ,�
� � �
�� ■� '
�
.11'►1
� � �
i ■��� ' � �..
� ■ -- � � �
� � 11
� ��
�
� �I � _ ��� � � � ���
��
r
... r�r,��r�r�
�. _
� ���r�
� �r��
��.�■�■
♦�
■ ��•,,,
..� _
�... `'.
V
�� AREA — A
i
I
Hydric WWH/�. WWHA �
�Netland /t Acreage Major�lant Community Soils� Score C(ass ;
1 2.79 Fraxinus, Salix, Rubus 43 61 2 �
2 9.33 Fraxinus, Salix, Symphoricarpos 43 76 1 �
3 10.52 Phalaris, Pseudotsuga, �raxinus 43 53 3 �
4 3.42 Fraxinus, Alnus, Rubus 43 60 2 j
5 0.51 'typha, Rubus, Salix 43 38 3 �
i
6 Stream Deveg�tated 43 18 4 '
7 U.34 Phataris, Fraxinus, Rubus 43 59 2 !
8 3.24 �halaris, Fraxinus, S�lix 43 66 2
9 2.85 Fra�cinus, Salix, Alnus, Rubus 43,13 77 1 �
10 1.0$ Rubus, Satix 43 �9 3
i
I 1 9.96 Salix; Fraxiinus, Atnus, Rubus 43 59 2 . f
r.
1'l 13.62 Alnus, Fraxinus, Itubus 13 64 2 �
13 2.73 No adjacent vegetation 43 18 4 �
14 0.28 Pseudotsuga, Thuja, Fraxinus 43 68 2 ;
� 15 42.02 Alopecurus, Agrostis 16C 44 3 's
�.
. i
;
*Soils Series Key �
.
No. Soil iVame '
i.'i,
!I
13 Cove siity clay loam �,`,
14 Cove ciay �'
16C Delena sitt loam(3-129'o slopes) '1
• 21C Hillsboro loam(7-12% slopes) �
22 Huberly silt loam �'��
E,i
42 Verboort silty clay loam ;�
43 Wapato silty clay loam ,�:i
��
s
�
• �
i
�
�
,,
_ �
i��iii; � • �
s,t;;ii?: ,
�
t
. _ � /z 5"/�9 '�I
� �
. WETLANDS WILDL.IFE HABITA"T ASaESSMENT*
� Clqss �
UNIT NO. LOC TION d �a . v �N �.Q ; .,���y CORE
�- �� �1/l��P��c��u�'�r � qr�C . �.08 �3
COMMENTS C�95s
o P : U /Uq `4r1 ,�/1 �Aqr' roo C • Gv' .
STAFF � DATE
COMPC7NEIVT UEGREE SCORE COMMENTS
Seasonality Seasonal --Perenniai �
4-----------------------------------
W Quality Stagnant Seasonally Flushed Continually Flushed
.A o--------------------s---------------------- 3
T Praximity None -_-_-Nearby Immediately Adjacent
E to Cover a----------- 4---------------------- g
R Diversiry One Present Two PrPSent Thre� Present S�-rec�.r� t
(Streams, Ponds, 2--------------------4----------------------- s o�r F�%���
iNetlands � ��G"�
Va�iety Low ----__Medium -_-�--�-High
F0----------- 4----------- �
O C2uantity ' Low Medium High •
O0--------------------4---------------------- �Z,.
ID Seasonality None Limi4ed Year Round
C 0--------------------2------------___------ �.
� Structural Low -__Medium High . '
C Diversiry 0___----------- 4---------------------- �
O Variety L'ow _-___eMedium ____-_-_High r�
N0---------- 4----------- . -�
E Seasonality None Limited Year Rau�d
R0--------------------2-------•-------------_--- '�
ADDITIONAL�/ALUES
, • Physicai High Medium Low
DISTURBANCE 0__________________2__________�_.� ,�
� Human High Medium . Low
0------------------2-------------- �
INTERSPERSION Low Medium High � ,
0-----------------3-------------- �
• UNIQUE FEATURES Wildlife Flora
� 0-4 points each Rarity of Habitat Type�� � i
. i
i
•Developed with the assistance of Mike Houck,Ponland Audubon Soclety,Ralph Roge�s U.S.E.P.A., �
Dennls Peters�Dtana Hwang,U.S.Fish&Wildlite Ser.,Gene Herb Oregon Dept.of Fish&Wildlife, , • i
Esther Lev,Biological Consuitant
' . 1
I
c
�;=�2�E�;. • i
� �I
'' SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES, INC. ,
� i
�
,
.._�._... .. ...:_�._ ,....._:- .,.:;c::u �_.:.<..,�
C`� _ _. .
'� t
C WTLDLIFE HABITAT FIELD NOTES
�ocat i on• �4 - 10
Observer° �� n I!I
Time: r Y3a -lS30 I
i
Weather:
Precipitation:. d
Wind• O
Percent cloud cover: U �
Temperature: ,v,;r� ?�s
Physical Parameters:
General topography:
Degre� and orientation of slope:
,
Water feat,ures (pond, lake, stream, stagnant, etc.) e •
SC�IS�/1 u/ S-�r°ANL
II � .
Percent of site inundated by water: 5
Major structures, roads: Q� M q�
Wildlife:
Species observed (herps, fish, bircis, mammals):.
(�e� -sh�f-�ecl +=��cker .
�/aux 's 5��;-F+ �
Sc�u� J�uy
R�I -bf��S-F�� �lu�-hu{-ch
R o���
2e�1- �,� P�I .a 1���6,�I �
s� � h� �
Tlf��7
Rec�- �a��PC�� ��k
��;.
_;��' ��
�; .
, .
. .. r
,'�, r�
( WILDLIFE HABITAT FIELD NOTES, cont.
,
Page 2 �- (0
Habitat Description:
List of important plants for wildlife use, dominance, plant,
wildlife relationships, vegetation diversity, stratification, and
seasonality, interspersion with other areas, water sour•ces in
relation to vegetation, seasonalit , and flushing, disturbance,
enhancem�nt ideas: �N��S SedJo�u ,y�n�,' ;; Scr1iX s •
_ . P �G e�S , � ,L—
`� �t �41�� �: ��t � �ti�� �k� NJ t�o'd qt�i
<o an Ur� r w �G-��?r�f.
S t�Y� SA' %X GI`P (�4M�'I��,'�', q ri�?
�, su ar C� -��'l, c/a�P�a 'an ;�,,�•n,.
o� , ✓P 'o ��''� cr��all r:+�t c/ G��' �L,
CL.fI • S i ' �vl G�� Gc.n '•� �i�l,' ,ti,• •
_ i` i �� �J� �Cl. �'l.�' �-�- ��^:� .
� c�l '� i1 �i"�- 't� o`�'? , Gr
-�- —
�� /'PG/Y�. S 11r1 /'k11.f -�'' d'�t,.t�
i " �/`L° .�t i� �.G2 i1�i-��
� ' �' —
Summary of Nabitat Quality:
�4� Fa�� m�U u 4 ► ���1 % EY!
' o `/1 W1 . 4/' �G. 'A S'"�P -
�
_ I'I
.
��:;
,��`'`` .
'
- . N
4 ti �
C Sketch of s i �' �o S
Ubservation points, different vegetation types� and water:
i �„ir� l - �/l•l �N`�� VC"/� �Q�I.V /
� _....�,�-... ✓ �
/�✓'�/�/� _ ��C{l S(a /'i�Q���� ✓�PJC P�q��'� I
�2���' �5 r,
� .. �'
` a�k s�},
�----�
r
I
J J!�l (�'l� '
: ���5;�� F. \P r,`
\ ;:
� /
�I S '', .
�-
�Pa r{�
�
f(�,�Sr n�G
�
. �
• -r .
Dauylql �r �'�c1, FQ��t
CA�'��c� �
� ���
:<<;;
_;;;;;;;:: .
w �
����Q���r f st.
,
r � �° ��4�GH����+�'' �
. .
C O rI T E N T S
T IIdTRODZICTZON
exterr�al forcea, the larger context: underetar�ding the dimensions of the
national phenomena and its consec�uencee for a locality ie the first step in
organizing realiatic courses of action
Economg� does not begin and end with thE City boundary. Local economic
developent is a xegional enterprise involvix►g all of the communities that
share a comm4n market area. Determin�d that �conamic d�velopment should be
conducted in coordinatiQn with County, etc.
Facus on locally based economic development activity and emplayment generatian
Tigard is a ma�or growth area. A growing community with new opportunities for
business arad coramercial growth
city not under pressure to respond to econamic probleme
competitive �dvantages: traneportation links, infrastructure, housing stack
levels, community aervicee
City haa� aoncer�trated on builciing the eocial and ins�itutional. n�twark,
includir�g a "no surprises" development review proce�as, that areates the
3.nducing enviranment for a firm to devel.op or locate in the cocnmunityo In
eseence, City policymakers have taken the atance th� if the structura is
organized in the correct manner, �conornic activity wi1.�. eneue �nd it will not
have to be pursued.
ls.mited int��v�ntion in the market syatem ap to now; the President's Pa�kway
and downtowr� urban renewal �alane policymakers are in�erventiona in the markefc
nyetem
I ECONOMIC CONDITION3
A Labor Force
Growth in population ia curren�ly being matched by an increa�e in employment
tract�ng of jobs created by development inside City
B Population
C Residential Location of Workere
Most of new jobs are unlikely to be filled by local reaidente
D Income
III RECENT DEVEI,OPMENT TRENDS
A Buildable Lands
supply af commmercial and induatrial land is finite
B City Commercial Development
wholesale and retai.l sectors are business activities that play a daminate rale
in local. economy
land supp].y
Preaident's Parkway
C City Induetrial Development 4`
Oregon Bueneae Park expansion
i:
sector repreeents basic employment ,_'
�`.
�;
s
ei�
�;':
fi�'.
<f
ti
, `�.
land designated far indu�trial uses in short eupply
D Tranaporctation
E Public Facilities
IV ACTION PLAN
E C O N O M Y
A Findi.ngs
State economia development strategy definee 8 majar optione for Oregon:
�mphaai.e on aticking to the basias anci concentrating on investing in public
warks, inveeting 3.n schools, investi�ng in environmental amenities, and striving
taward an economy with greater apportunity and fairness
Citp main�air►s clear and consi�tent develapment review procedur�ea
Cor� problems faci.ng the city is lack of buildable land designated for
industrial use, secondarily, lack of land designated for comme�cial uae
conceptual framew�rk: in�kerdependencies wi.thin region and publia and private
sectors
local niche is wholesaling and retailing
need for local oultural and recreational opportuni�ies
up to now no special incentivee far development
One of tlae most eignificant potential thre�ts to economimc development is the
new water qu�lity etandards for the Tualativn Ri.ver is one of the most
si.gnificant po�ential threate tu economic development
lack of locaZ indu�trial and comrnercial land
B Polici.es
Improve the City•e economia baee by
C Implementatioin Strategies
Not self contained, olosed �co�omic system
scopse of stategy: cooperate with I-5 ABBOCe TVEDC, country and other tiers of
government ta on economic development activities
Local government involvement:
maintain comprehensive databaee of demographic and economic information,
demonstrat� support for local induetry Buaines Aevelopment Fund and Industrial
Revenue bond application� for low interest finanaing ,
inspite o£ cantinued growth and prosperity and a hQalthy economy overall, there
oontinue ta be areas of the city in dec:line; economic growth has had very �
uneven spatial impacts wi.thira the comanunity; restoration �f the city center
area, Triangle area developm�nt
the literature euggestes that it ie the quality of the eupport a�rvicea in the
locality that determines the potential for new economic activity
community needes local cultural and recreational opgortunities, quality of
life improvements
support recreational and cultural oppurtunities
liveabilityia an important component of economic development
attractiveness or ameiYity of a particualar area is one of the nmoet important
�: __ _ �,..._. __,:._ .�,_— �..._,,_—..__ _.�._...._.
_ _ r:i
.�.
; , x
i'�..�. I�.
'I
fact,ora influencing location decie3.ons for new private sector inveetment
Industry and business regard "liveability as an important locational €actor,
and local government ie in the be�t poaition to i.mprove the loc�l qualit� of
li£e
de�ign a long-term economic dev�velopment program that builds on the
oppartunitiee in the community and
Gaals of econ �iav etrategy are to build quality jobe for the local populatian,
achieve lrscal econnmic e�abiltiy, build a div�erse econamic b�s�
�ssemble all socioeconomic data in a single packag�s
targeting requires establising the epeaific feature identification required lby
an 3.ndustrg or certain type of firm
s�all indigenous business development, home-g•rown busninessos
ne�d ta addreae iaeeue af land supply: laok a rezr�ning, tranaportation iasuee,
k�igher density multi-damily, c�ensity iseue offic� '
spc�cial incentives for lagging ar�as of city, more epecifically Tria�ngle and �
city centero master plan and financisl scheme for fu�ding �
sg�cia�l etucly ar�� 74th area indixstrial maeter plan .includinc� �urvey to �
determine �l,nodplai.n, lock into channelizing creek; ,
aG�fve buainaas recruitement anct nead for ep�ecial incentivea or aubeidiea ��
aonsider apecial si�eign regulatione for ci�ty center, triangle and diamond `
z
arese
Highway 99 strip comm�rcial zone look at wayea to make more vieually �
attractive, such as pull outs, clugtering, limi�ed accesa redevelopment ' ji
reduae aongeetion and malse more attractive, 99 is the citiea primary identity �
boulevard vs stri comcnerical eff�sct e3.d�walke to faeili�tate �'
p , ped�gt�ri�n
movement
�i
build a bueineas reference library -
look at axeas as a aingle unit, package iz�form�tion, han� out infc�rmatior� �nd
pe�rmit forms
Triangle denaity iaa�ae height/density
coordinate l.and inventory syetem with Waehington County, RLIS inventory system
1to beaome fully operatianal i
a
�
F
i
9outline/DR k
i
4
�
�.
i
�
i
�t
3
t
k
t
�
�
�
�
!�° . ,, .. ,
__ � �r����r C.
�� ��.
PUBT�IC FACILITIES PLAN
The purpose of a Pub7.ic Faoilities Plan is to aesure that urban developmerat ia
c�ided and supported by typee and l�vels of urban facilitiee (water, aew�r and ;
transportatian) app�opriate for th� needa ar�d requirements of the urban �reas
to be �erviaed.
Th� Public Facilitiera Plan will contain the fallowing itecna for watQr, eewer
and �rane�rtation £acilities.
a) An inventory and general ae�eesrnent of the condition e�f all significant `�
faci].ity �yetems which eupport deeignated Zand usee.
r�
h� A 1�.e�t of aigmificant facilit� p�ojecte which ara to support de�ignated
land uess, including d@ecriptiane and apecificatiang of th� projecta.
c) Rough cost e�ti.nnatea tor each PU�lic facility project expreeeed in �urrent- z
year dollars. '�
c�) A map or written deecrip�ion o£ each p���eCt"g 9�n�ra7� loca�ion or s�rviae
arsa.
e) Policy st�tement(�) or urban grnwth management agreement identifying the
provider af +sach public facili,ty sys�em.
f) pin estimate af when each facility project will be needed. �
A discuesion of the provider'8 existir�g funding mechaniems andl tha ability a
9) ;
of theae an� poseit�e n�w mechaniems to fund the d�velapment ca£ each public f
facili.�y project ox syatem. j
i
The plan iteelf will be adopted as a supporting document to the compreheneiv�.
glan. In addi.tion, the follawing may be adopted ae �iart; of the compreheneive
plan: 1) a li�t of public faaility project tf.tles, 2) a map or written
deacription of the prr�ject'� location or serviae area, 3) policy{ies)
regarding eaGh public facility �yetem.
'THIS DOCUMENT IS UNDER DE�tELOPMENT
IT WILL BE AVAILABLL PRIOR TO TEiE F'INAL HEARING
,,�
_,,,w..., .., w".�:,__t:x;
, �._._._,.,..._ ,_�. ,.�.,,,�... _: _.. -- -
--- CARL H. JOHNSON
� i
8965 S.W. Burnham Street I
Tigard, Oregon 97223 7.7 D[ar• 19g0
(503) 684-5253
Ti��rd Pl�nnin� Comt�i�aion Re� :: Piablie �asrine 3��0�90
13125 S, W. H�.�1 B17d. Pmriod.id Re�i.�x
Ti�ard, Ore�an 97223 CoKprehensive Plr�a
La,md Use �e�ul�tioYe
'Phe�re ia an inherent unfe�irness i� the Ssnsiti�e Lsnda S�cstior� of th�
7.'i�e�rd Corn�n�anity D�YSIop�.e�t Gode a.:�d Com�preher�sirs Plsn �hat n.eoia
�orrea�ia�o I.�t no iZ�.uatrate.
?�y praper�y on ��anne �reek is, exaept f.or o�e small p�rael, tl�e l,�st '
one aoutla in t�e oity. I� is not wetl�nd. I^� Me�s o�e sure withiM �
the 100 y�ar flood pl�in. thsder th:e Pl�n and Rsgula�ion$ it a.p�eare
I am e�xp�ated to absorb �he inarma�sin� rwnofi' of all the new de�elop-
�teiate upatrea�s.
To my pmrsonal knowled�e datin� back •t� 1947 areas borderin�; Fanz2o
Creek and on tribut�.ri�� h�Te baen fillsd to brinb them abo�re flood
levels. FTote thm fl�t A-Boy ys�rct, tk�� Pu�et Co. yard om Bonita� Read
�nd the orea�k sides of ra�rious lats be�ween �onite And Dur�a�� Roads.
Thia fillir��, xakes 9erzs�. Z� is totally �ron� to exreo�t propert��
o�xners of the lower F�nAO Creek area--2�iai� Strse� to I)ua°ha�a City to
r�bs�rb- hold the sxesess wa►ter causmd by d�velop�enta of Bea�ertan,
Ti�,ard ar�d I,ake Oswego.
To Qorreot thi� unjustiae ��ad socnm oth�rs th� oom�xahmnai�e Plazs
a�d Le�nd Use R��ulation� �.eed revision. Ow�.ars �houl�l be allowed
to proteet their properties f'ron� hi�h wRters. Isn' t t�at wh�t ia
d�ne alon.�; the �issiesi.ppi RiYer -- fill a�nd dixe; e�md the City
of Tue�l�tin havin� rr�quired 4 to 5 foot fill dov►ntotm?
In rsy oase th�re is e� bxirl�e on Durham Road abuttin� the property.
I sh�uld iM fairness bs alloweal to fill at le,�ast up �o thb roaid
levcl. This �ro�ld still allow th� �axi�aum florr tha� snn �o �xmder
the bridQe �o pxss downstream.
Also, in this oontex�, r�quirin� �he i.on�ta.on of land to the oity
is elearly L��lawful. T refer you tQ th• l�olla�. dseisio� of the
Uo S. �upren�e Court.
Further elaborwtions on these azid ot�ier related parts of thc� Plan
and Re;ulatiorss r3ealin� wi.th lnnd tl�eratiom, lanal donatior�, Land
aubdi�isio�., eto. wil� h�T� to s�wait thm pu�b11� haarin� e�nd if I
¢��no� be present I r�gu�st to b� allowed to ��il thera in le�ter.
Respeatflzlly �ubnaitted,
��+�-� '�a� r �L��Z� Q��p�
Carl Ho/,�o ��so� MAR 211��.- 0 .
99
�
� . _ _
� �.
MEMORA�iDUM
TO� planning �ammiesion AGEND,A ITEM 5.2
FAOM: Keith. Liden, Senior PZanner
IAEs SW Locuet Street Vacation
DATEs March 13, 1950
On Mazch 12, 1990, the City Council initiated vacation proceedinga for the
ak�ove item. Utility companies and o�her agenciea have b�en contacted
regarding thie vacatioa and no objectione have been received. In aome aae�s,
however, ixtility ea�ementa will ne�d to be provided to replace port;ions of the
right-of-way to be vacsted. Attached is a copy of the information summary
p�ee�nted to the CounciZ.
The Planning Commission elxauld r�vi.ew thie propoeal, review any public
teetimony, and formulate a recommendation for the City Council..
]LOC3T.VAC/lcl
, . , . LI• �
,; ,,
`� �, .__.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA ClF: 3/12/90 DATE SUBMITTED: 2/28/90
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Stree�. vacation PREVIOUS ACTION: none
re est for ortions of SW L'ocus
Street
PREPARED BY K�3,th�,i+�en
DEPT HEAD fJ CI7.'Y ADMIN O REQUESTED BY:
�
LICY ISSUE
�
Council initiated atreet vacation requests should be consiatent with Council
policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30.
�
INFORMATIOPI 5UMMARY �
!i
'I
In conjunction with �he SW Locuat Street improvement project, the City entered ';i
into an agreemernt with Weston Inveetment Compariy to trade ,a portian of the '
i�
existing SW Lacus� Street right-of-way for the dedication of a different area 'i
of land to be part of the street r.ight-of-way. This land trade was agreed to !''
in order to accommodate a new alignment far the street. The City is obligated �I
by the agreement to initiate the vacation of the street right-o£-way in order ;
to recei..ve the new right-of-way which will correspond with the new strest �.
locat�on. A aopy of the agreement anc� map of the affected are attached.
jl
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED �
�
1. Approve the attached resolution calling for a public hearing on April '
23, 1990. ;
2. Take no actiora at this time. �
i
FISCAL IMPACT
;:
All feee and etaff coats wfll be paid by the City. ;I�,
�
• ;
i
' SUGGESTEA AC�ION (
�
i
Approve the attached resolution. '
i
LOCOST.VAC/kl i
,� �
,�'�P�.'+� 3/2/� �
!
■ ' �
� , �
�.��� '� - r
i L
� ��
� , �
, \ -�
� �i� ♦ �
., � � -� . �!1/
� ■ �..
/ .• _ , .. � �
� :��� �� ��� � � � �
r......t � � � .
` J "
� . -
� ■ � � � �� � �� � .
.� � �f n ��������11= 1'����'�� � �� . -
II�' �`� '� *����II� :�.. � � � � �, �� � '
���1 �' L 1! � �
��I � ��„� �„ ���1�t1� _--_- � �� �
� - � ! ���� �■� . � .. .�
���� ■ 1 1� �■. , .. .tii : '
� �
,����V r �������e et'e�� ��� � Si� _ � ���� ��� �� �.,
♦ ■ � �;��
r�► � �������� �� J � ` ,� � �i\` �ti/ ��� . '
�� I�. ,���������� � �#� �, , ► � • '� � �3.`� �i� . � `�� �
� �`•� i'i■� �1/�H �i -`■ ■ ��� �: i�i �i ' �
t.,.�lll �,��_ N � • ;�1 1� .
� � .�ZI ���� � _ � � �\ - . !: .'�1� ��% ,
I �I ' � � i :,-'�"ii .�� : ������ .
�� i� � .. .
� ■ ■
�, �..�n '- ' �. � � �
� • � � �f� , ` ��-a.., r1 IN
�.r. n.. •�■ � ,. .
, �'`', - . ,'�'a\. ': . �,
1� � � .�: - :�.. �� �_ . � , /11■ �_ ■
� . �'�� ��: �. ■ .. ► � � �� ��i
�� � � �� L � � �
. � � - `� a�, ��� ��n� .� ' �j�7
�� � � � � C � � �1 �
I��N "' �.,. �r. �.. � • � _
: � , �i� �� � � Q.'.� ...
� � �
r= = ��' " ''ii :ii -' '� � �� ■ , ���
� l�i� , ' �i: �' : � � �•• '�: ..
� . ��� � -.. .. • „- � �: � .� „ �.
■ �s��� .■ ■f� i�■� . :1� ��l
■ ■ ■■�. . ,. ��
, :
. ��Nco ' �
C,y �;
� S.W. 92nd AVE.
• N SrREET
. �- . . , � . ,
� �s " ; � � ,. _
, : � _. . . , y ,
. m � .
t .
- . i- . . . ..
' D _ ' �.,a. •
'�1 . � . •
• � . . • ' .,' � - � .. • ' .
m z�
. . • � � '. � �
?� c
� � . � - � N
, , �-- � -� '
(INONROE S'�) S.W. 90th �
: �
� , AV E. ,
- cn
-�
� �
- � m .
�m
' •-� N .
. f ,
o e,
D p
7C , A
r"
`�FFFERSO �''
:-�
' . I
.
. . ' 87th AVL. .
�.-N-1 . � � ' .
S.W. HALL BOULEVARD
' � �-.r
D •
. .� .
r � �
m �r �
� � � �:
� � o�
� �- .
-�
, � - Q
. . ._ .�� .
.\
CITY OF TIGAIdD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESl7LUTION CONCERNING TFiE VACATION OF A PORTSON OF ,SW E,OCUST STRE�T IId THE
CITY OF TIGARD, WASI3INGTON COUNT�C, OREGON.
WHEREAS, A vacation request has been received and filed with the City Recorder
for vacation of publia street right-of-way; and
WIiEREAS, this po.rti.on of 2and was previou�ly granted for public etreet and
utility purp�ses and is currently unimproved; and
WHEREAS, the Tigarc� �ity Council find� it necessary and ciesirable ta initiate
vaca�ion proceedings for said parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL�IED bx the Tigard City Council tl�at:
(1) That the Tigard City Council initiatea the vacation request with the
understanding that thoae property owners who would normail,y, sign a
peti�ion shall be nn�ified by mail of the proceedinge and that the City
af Tigard wi"11 pay all fees and charges as aet forth in TMC Chap�er
i�.�s.
(2) �hat a publio lnearing is hereby called to be he].d by the City Cauncil on
Monday, April 23, Z990 at 7:30 PM at the Tigard C3.vic Center Tnwn Hlall
Room, 1�125 S'W Yiall Boulevard, �ri.thin the City af Tigard, at which time
and pl�ce the Cauncil ghalL hear any objections, and any intere$ted
person may appear and be h�ard for or against the proposed vacating of
sa�.d landa.
(3) That the City Recorder be, and ahe ig hereby, authorized and directed to
cause to have published in the xigard tinaes, a newapaper of general
circulation in the City of Tigard horeby designated for such purpos�, a
notice of said hearing in the form hereto attached and by this refere�nce
mada a part hereof, the first publicat.ion �o be Mmrch 15, 1990 and once
each week ther.eafter for fiwe publi.ehings in all.
The Recorder be, and ehe ie hereby, �urther directed to cause to �ave
poeted within five {5) daye after the date of £iret publication, a copy
of said notice in the form a�tached, at or near each end of the area
prc�posed to be vacated.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
Page 1
�`;;,;'�
� :;
_ _ - �I
.
�.
� wt I
(4) 7Chat the particular portion of granted pu}�lic etreet right-of-way
proposed ta be vacated ie deacribed on the attached sheets headed
Exhibit "A" (legal description) and Exhibit "B" (m�p) and by reference
made a part thereof.
PASSED: This �, day of _ __ , 1990.
;
� Mayor - City of Tigard
� ATTEST:
t
I
�
i
�'. City Recoxder - City of Tigard
E
# LC)CVAC.RES/kl
.�
�� ,
r
,f
i:
�'��.
�,
' t'_.
(;
k;:
t� b
RESOLU'�ION NO. 90- j
Hage 2 �`
i`
f,
; }�
�:'
. . . � � . � � Y'
�L_ __... . .... . . . . . � � ._ � . . � .. . . .... . . . . . ... .. .'1
. , � — - . —
�. _
UJ�stic�k� Consultc�nrs Inc.
Hillto� f3usir�ess Center
7340 S.U1. Nunziker, Suite 204 � �
Tig�rd, Oregon 97223
� � 503-68�-0652 '
,
� i
I,ocust Stree� " C�/��p�r J� � :
Vacation G/\ D t� ';
Project Na. 451-02-89
March 29, 1989
. ;
� L�GAL DF5CRIPT:CnN
A t�ract of I.and situated in the N.E. 1/4, Section 35, T.1S. , R.1W. ,
W.M. , City af �a�gard, 4�asha.ngtc�n County, Oregon, being more parti-
cularly described as follows: �
All that portion of S.W. Lacust S�reet dedic�ted as publi;a way by the '
subc7�.vision plat of °'Lekimann AGre Tract", "Town o� Metzger", and by ,�
dedication deed as recorded June 6, 197�, in Boak 870 , Page 594, 1
VTashington Gaunty d�ed records, lying �asterly o� ��he w�st line of �ot 1
5, "'Marlo Tracts", a c7u�.y recoxded subdivision plat; lying westerly of ''
a e 2 9
the west line of vacat�on ordinances record�d in Boe�k 964, F g 6
ancl Book �83, Page 102r Washinqton Cc��.nty deed rec�rcls; and lyi.ng
northerly �of th� followa.nq describec7 liner
Beginning at a point an the north line of the dul� recordeci subdivi-
sion plat of "Town of Metzger.." in the N.E. �./4, Sectio� 35, T.15. ,'
R.1W. , W.M. , said point al.so- bears North 0 °26'00 " West, 3A .00 feet �
from �he northeast corx�er of Lot 3, Block 3 a� sai�d "7.'own of rietzger";
thence, South 89°34'00 " '[nlest, along the north J.ine of s�aid "Town o�'
r�etzger", 29.39 f eet; thence, at right �ngles to said north line,
l�arth U °26 '00 " West, 30 .00 feet to a point �€ curvature and the txue
point of beginninqe the:�ce foll�winG �he arc of a 445.G0 f�o� radius
curve to the right (the long chord af which bears South 77°40 `54"
East, 196.44 feet) tY�rough a ceritxal angle of 25°30 'll", a di:stan,ce of
198.07 feet to a poi.nt of tangency; thence, South 64°55'49" Eas�, i�
73.08 feet to a point oF curv�ture; thence, following the arc of a �
385.00 foot radius curve to tY�e l.eft (the long chord af which bears `�
5outh 77°36'40 " � Ea�t, 169.0 3 f eet) thxough .a central � angl�e of
25°21'41", a distance of 170 .42 feet to the terminus of said lin�.
� �G�sT¢a.�a� �
�R��E554QNAL ``
Contains : 2, 6$0 sq. ft. � ;
c ':Flc7 S212Y�Y0? i
�:����
� � � �..,� _ � ;
• yt t �. 1 7 73 . ,
:� i� s,'r'a . � �1; ��Y i
� ` • I
�'
�
_ ENGINEERING / SURVEYING /' PLANNIf�1G :�
�;
�;
,� _ _ ;._._ ..... .: . . . ... ....:...:..:
� . .
'' t �
''�
�.�GUG7 5'�. - �A�A7 i or.l - DI�D��A��on� . '
, �����`C� Z( 8� �S.F. ± — VALaTio�1
5����
� V����'� . � . 200� S.i-. ± _. DzD�ca-t�o..l I
� ' � '
111Z1L1L1L(IllL �o s.F. � - oEO«aY��•.t
I
„ .
. a N1A�LD �
�aY 1� T2ACY F�
II, ' G t L�aN�:��.t Ar�th�� ,
� 5 �
� �
I Q trti�t' E-o-�u
u
' " V�e�nocJ SLaLG s / �� � SO�
.e�O . PRoraxo ,f �naeu+ 30� o�s9
��� R o t� ��e �
' a �1��
/�- � ` .
� T.�X Lof '7GY7
� �
. y �
_ ��y`` � 11141J DM`�\LO�1Gt.I
. T.L.4C� .
V
i �Q y ' �
' �\ �+L/ � L—
_ t�cw �� Gl�l� �� � �., �.
r . �-� '�
_ � �_ . — _ �aw �
, � � � �' �yq
� . � . -
.� .
z
�
; � � . .
��., �
,
�
��.:. �w..,-
MEMORA.'�IDUM
TOt Planning Commission AGENDA ZTEM 5.3
FROMs �Ceith Liclen, Senior Planner
R�E: Marning Hill Pedeetrian Eaeemgnt Vacatian
DA�L: March 13, 1990
On March 12, 1990, the City Council initi�gsd vacation �roceedinga for �he
�laovs ite,m. Util3.ty companies and other agenc�e� hav�
e been contacted
regardia�g �his vac�tion and nn objec:ti.ona have been received, provided that the
utility portion of th� easennent is retained. Attached ia a copy o� the
in�fcsrmation �ummary pres�nt�c� to the Councii�.
i
The P]:an�ing Conuniseion Bhotxld r�view thie pr4�soeal, raview any public
te�sti.mony, and fior.mnlate a recommendation for the City Council. :
i
rsoRrr e v�c/ki l
j
�
�
,
�
�
�
a
�
i
�
¢
�
E
�.
�
�
,
�
�
�
. �
�
�
z
�
�
�
!
�
,
k
i
i
1
�
i
�
I
i
i
i
;
�„ . . ..� :,t _
. , , , y � �
,
t'4 `�.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA, ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OFa_ 3/].2/90 DATE SUBMITTED:�28/90
ISSUE/AGENDA TITT,E: Pedestrian PREVIOUS ACTION: none
easement vacation between Lots
122 and 1�3 of Marninq Hill No. �
PREPARED BY: IC@� 'h Lide1T'`"'`
DEPT HEAIa OK IT% ADMIN OR REQUESTED BY:_
QLTCY ISSUE
Council initiated street vsaation requests should be consist�nt with Council
polic�► as adapted by Resolutinn No. 85-30.
i
INFORMATION SUMMARY �
�Jim Hart amd JoAnn Burd have rec,�uested tlae vacation of a pedestri.an easement
which lies befcween Lots 122 and 123 0£ Morning Hi11 No. 6. This easement
connects 131st Avenue and a drainageway/wetland but it does not presently
contain .a deaeloped eidewalk ox pa�h� The storm drainag� eaaement loeated i
beween these two lots is i��ende� to remain. It is proposed by BenjFran
Development Co. that a pedestrian easement b� provided between Lote 154 and 155 �
in the next pha�e c�f •kiorning Hill to the south. Ttxis aubstitute pedestrian
easement wi1.1 be i.n an lunpraved location for prov�.din� access to the
drai.r�ageway area in the future. It appears that a vaca�ion of this easement
with the �rov,�aion nf a replacement access to the aouth may be aaneietent w3.th
thQ best xntereat of the City, Mr. Hart�s and Ms. Surd�a letter and a map o£
°� trie affected are attached.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
i
l. Approve the attached resolution calling for a public hearing on April
23, 19900
; ;'i
�.
�, 2. Take no action at thie time. •
` 3. Require the property owner to oirculate a petition.
�;
�'�.
j FISCAL IMPACT `
f
f ;'
t, All fees �nd etaff costs will be paid by Mr. H�rt. �?
(
4
� SUGGESTED ACTIdN �
�''
� �i
iApprove the attached resolution.
t �,',
�,`:
i A�ve� 3�� qo f�
�, MORNHILL.VAC/kl �,
�'i'
� ,
i �
! ��
�a4
�� . . . � . . �� . . . . . . ... � . .. ... . . .... ..
�:
� '
�I� �
� ' ., -
� :��
.. •� ��a�r `
.
������:Ii�����fu :
�
� ���N��l� _���n����rr
�.. � � .
�i� _ -- -
' . ' � C
� ��� i�` r H.i ,'•��.�
��.� ���� ���rJ� � � ;� : . �' . ��_ .��
�- � -� � — � ��►�
� � � — � � � � �i .� �� ���nd� � •
�, ` I — � n �O /� �.�� �� �
�,y; � �� ��� �I� ��� � ����; ������� t: .
� �" /��� � � �y ���i , +r� . „ ., . �� . ���►
•� !I �.. •�` `' �� �� �� � '�i� �s;�IH�
� .� � ���! �►. �
�—��� �R�■ � �' '�� �" � �►�f� �I
��E ..�.:1/I� . ;�:.�Ii�■■■■�i���a
�L■!� ��� .�..'�,� �� � ���
�� ■i':�r���� �� : ��� r�ti�
������� ��•� .. _ •• =�i������
,��t;;���i��rr. - � �v�� � ..� .
- /ii �! ��■ ������\�� � . . �� ��, � � .
__ � './ I��d��C`►�.;, � a� � s' �r: !� . �, � �
■� ����.. ��`-+t�� i ► � =�, �
- '���1 �1`/� i i �' �, !�,:
- -- �% � : ���
��»�V
���r,1 �� A■� � ' ' : � � c•e ��I�r � _ -
= ��A = �� ■ ■ • � u �1�1 ' 1
� • � - _ � ° t■� - � �
� - -
� � ,� �� r
�1�i ""' , I� �� �
�
, 1 • � — ► -
♦ �� ��►�
! ■ � 1/I
■ ■ �������
__---�.
, . � E�. '�. -
Keith Lyden �,7—j�-�v
Senior Planner.
City of Tigard ' .
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. �
Tigard, OR. 97223
Dear Mr. Lyden, ,
Pe.r our conver�ation, we are requesting the vacation ot the '
pedestrian access cur•rent]_y between �ots 122 and 123 of Morning
Hi.�l 6.
The V3etlands Conservancy, �uture owners of the wildlife hat�itat, .
support this request. They prefer access to the area from ~
Katherin� St.
B�nj . Frankli.� Devel�pment wi�l allow far a new pedestrian access
betwean lots 154 and 155 of the preliminary plat for the next
phase of Morning Iiill.
- Respectfully,
_ a���JIJ v � _
Jo nn V. Burd .
Lot 123, l�orninq Hill 6
12310 S.W. 131st. Ave.
Tigard, OR. 97223 -
�
„ �---_--
� �� .
James E. Hart
- Lot 122 Morning Hill 6
" 12228 S.W. 131st. Ave.
Tigard, OR. 97223
RE�19FD i�MNlrt11�
� FEB 12 a990 '
t
�
� ``�
GIT% OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A REa.SOLUTION CONCERNING THE VACATIOIZ' OE" A FEDESTRIAN EASEMENT BETFTEEN LO'PS 122
ANTD I23 UF MORNTNG HILL NO. 6 IN TFIE CYTY' OF TIGARD, WA5HINGTON COU�iTY, OREGON.
WHEREAS, A vacation request has been received and filed wfth the City Recorder
fax vacation of public pedeetrian easement; and
WH�REAS, this portion of land wa,s previously granted far .publie gedestrian
aacees and ia currentl,y unimproved fnr this purpose; and
WHER,EA3, t�ae �igard City Council finde it neaessary and de�irable to initiate
vacatian proceedings for said parcel.
NOW, THER�F6RE, SE TT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
(7.) That t§�e Tigard City Council initiat�e� the Wacatinn rec�est with the
unde�cstanding ttaat thas� pro�rty awnere who would normally si,gn a
petition st�aii be notified by mail, of the proceedings and that Mr. Hart
will pay a11 fees and cYaarges as set a�ut in TMC �hapter 15.08.
, (2) That a publia hear3.ng ie her�by called to be� held by the City Council on
Manday, Aprii 23, 1990 at 7:30 PM at the Tigard C3:vic Centar Town Hall
Room, 13125 SW dia11 Boulevard, wf,thin the City uf Tigard, at which time •
and lac� the Council shall hear a� ob ectio s
p y j n , and any intereated
person may apgear and be heard for or against the proposed vacatinq of
esid ].a�nde.
(3) Tha:t the Ci�cy Reaorrler be, and ehe ia her�by, suthorized and directed to
cauee to have publiehed in the Tiqsrd times, a newapaper of general
circulat3.on in the City of Ti.gard lxer�by deaignated for such purpoae, a
notiice af said heari�g in the form hereto attached and by this reference
made a part hereof, the first publication to be March 15, 1990 and once
each week thereafter for five publishings in all.
The Recorder be, and she ie hereby, further directed to caues to have
posted within five (5) days after the ciate of firet publi�al:ion, a copy
of eaid notiae in the form a,ttached, at or near each end of the area
proposed �o be vacated.
RESOLtJTION NO. 90-
Page: 1
t
L�
, I ' , � ��...
(4) That the partieular por�tion af granted public atreet ri.ght-of-way
pxopc�aed ta be va�ated ie shown ori the a�tached pagea headed Exhibit "A"
and Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof.
PI�SSED o This _� day of , 1990.
Mayor - City of Tiqard
.A�TESTs
, City Recorder - Cit�r of Tigard
MOYBNFiXLI..RES f kl
i
4
i
i
i
�
i
!
�
,
i
�
i,
�
G',
�
�
i . � . . . � �� .
�� . . . . . . .. . .. . ..
.`. . � .� .. . � . . . '� � .
�{. . . . . � . . . .
� RESOLUTION NO. 90- •
� Page 2
� .
� , � '
. �`� . �' I
��_..__. _ . . . __ _.._. .....___._ ... ;�,
. �
Exhibit "A"
A. fifteen �oat wide etrip of land located in the northeast quaurter of section
4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,
Washington County, bregon being deacribed ae followss
Th� eoutherly five feet of lot 123, Morning Hill Na. 6, a reaorded plat,
i
Waahiagton County Plat recorda, �oqrether with th� n�r�Raerl� �en f�eet o�• lot
122, said Mo�ning Hil�. No. 6.
, ,
..�...�.
REGISTERER�
PRQfiES310IV1�1,
LAND SUFtYEYG►R
. _
��
OREGt�
JANUARY 15,1�QT
JON 1:FEIGION
i
i,.
�
+
. �
• �
`•__. y ' �
M I. � � .. . � 1
4
. 1 � .. . � .. ,
. �
2i
� . . . . � . . . 1
. � .� � . . . '� . . .. �
�
4
� .
- � �-. •---1._ .�..._._,.. . ..__.._-•-- -•- ....___ ._ .. _ .._._.___,,_�.``�� -
I ��.�
� ;(�,� GG f°�.. 3s �
I ' �EE4 1 OF� '
I ' e U 5� MORNING MILL N0.1
I ��' MORNIN6 Mil= N0.2 I I I �j I �8
MORNING Mtll N0.7 � e1 r��w'�������n,t'�c 5� I j � i �:.� .
� ( t 306,20 tnitfa�
II � N 12'12'B!' E �7.00 S 27' '02' 21i:30 ��S S `Of07' E ��. � • �ar�•�.t n�rc
9 .��,�.�ir t e �c.. I
N 12'�2'se• E fo.00 � B3 ef� a" � • 13]
� = 78 I � 10�.00 \_ � � 124 ; t,�ot w.rf. nae�n.voc
�N 4 �o� � a�� t f !1'02' t � , 1�2 � Lr� w.rT. Rx�rns,�a�»
E 71'1�'02' E 20 yN � . t,���w.�t �� �� �+o�rarc•x.c■i
I .,w.,s � es• �t ��.w � 1» �ti Sai �rt.�ocnas �� _ �i ue.vo
' ! � ! e f ��.�n M rt. t f, ! a�,��,�rt�17 ! � �.>
�y _.�r..�llS�— A R 71 � 1�0 'A= ' . � �N.tt. _
+3p »+ N It �.IN M./f. _ � �sn..anr�s� � ����� � r.—=---
� � . Ny t�iFs,�r"�7 t� ���i�a�i�iif� � � �hw �•. • e!art'°�is�'G�' r rT � � 122
ftewfc.o�e� ! -L�*� ��. i � i S2S Sp tla �.n.
n� �' �r � L �� t.too N.�f. S. ' .
_ �oi.w � �� r� � :�� �.m�w re ■�rw'i�•.�4 � �' I � erainuii:ie� a
1�2 . s L t1T !�f rr ' \ �� + .aw '(� �`i uewsr I � s �.
�� i.+s�M �� +� ,n;•y1E fAo�re.�i �. Y !g ,� �t 1�0 � � � � � `
.� � .� � .•*� �.�� ' � an.N,.,.�� � s sai � /
,� �r .. , � ....r.
� • 'o+.'° � �w•�. 1o:a� i. 1�! 'i, � �i = i Llooa�.n. =I = 4.�00 4 �.e.vr t.�.t.�.0
• A � f.UOM /�. n.f� �N t�"tht � �IC , C �.�J
_�0, tAOt1 w.�t. •� ��y � t.soo s�e �� 5�• t ��_ 'a—�—____t l"��,�',B::1 $y �.�••� : ,w � .
^O�� 1��� `+, '� !/' !Y ��.�� �. __ �Sw L v
�..��`� � � �N SZa t��"�
- ���N �•� !t• t .�,, ��t,N...• n�e �u�b A !2! � !�/ . 44 i i ! t?ooi�.rt. _� N �
. . $� i q01•Fx�.:.� .�! eu� S O.MtN.FT. �il� .lt.a.. !P) S � C r,
' i y.;;11�►�,�'.[r� � !7{ �rx � %� � S��.�rr H.n. t s aR , i 1.i8
� ir ir r v,�.�• �
+� � � � 9.IbC M rt " � w�e YiT ii�e � _� � � :��
w A � S, 191 � fw � > $ w�
�«�.�. f� ^ ^.,,t.v�fw.�� t+c"a I ` � � �� P roTn�ie c �n
�`•' �� • . �� , � �i i ��� ,�.� s ii� , �s
.. l�s , � , o � t.soo u.rr. ,; '°.;
! r� s tau r.rr � ti �n nn -1 1�.�4 ,.� m i ! n I J 7
i
[ N � 1�1 ,� st.� ' � p�_ s
;, lr 37, r r
� ! 7.i0eM.tt. g na���r A 6ENt3M ,�I��_���i�.5� •r�•��Y�1I �'�'�'
�. � " x. b.a:, �'sk�Knr� • �a !.W• ���� _oi..���•�''t��+ � t � . �n.�r��i� t.�r�
�� �e .� �,�..v. �s = .,.�- z. �--,�-- ; .. xl � __
� �` t a� d� y,��t b �ts.v� i liB •
� } �i s � �°�'lf• } 7 • ' n�. , cu � u� t��a��.rf. I i1 t)
E :
,i � fA11 l�.r� 1! � ° tv� � � M � j � ' iS� � .
� ���' • 1.9 "1f2 s e e.��t w.n , �y i
nw�r� y r.�u N r�. !30 SSl a�e.o»�.rr.�. .Q� a��C y q 9 y, r.'"
S !�'S1'�2' M 39.5� � � �witu�nr ��1 •�.t��M.II.=G�•If1 N.It.i� � � . � x 1 t+ �2•3y .� Z
, 1�„"°',� ti�� . . i�q � .. s je.00 = 13y
N 1 '�oo• 2� c ` � .�� \ W 50•
�^ � 1�1 � �Sr41 . • • y � gEl�4S ��l•�E���• yp��� ,to J �.� c �i� , -
. i� .t.uf w.n. � taeo w.n ! N i9 �C 00 Nj N 11'SS'32° E l.�2 �0.1.
. � _`; ~ ' t � f�.a�r I ft.t l�09.MftMt 1M11 a�1•e e I�l U
`—S 1'��'32' V 25.00 � 4 ,a
�� �f��X ���00.0� 1 ef Oi �50.00 � Paa �N.�`r i r. i.ewi
'K �� ' M� M09NING HILL N0 . 6 �° � �^
� � V '
� M !'U'S2' E �t.t1
x SitUAtED 1N tkE H.E. i/� Of SECTION 1 0`"
u.t+•r•�n �!�rr RK�.t�uv R��nt�u TOYNSM1f?2 SOUTN, lIANGE 1 ME6T, xlllAllE1TE MERIOUN a•\�n.�.a
� st�u: 1 1Na•!e fE[t �c�;a�p� CITY OF TICARO'y COUN7Y OF HASHIN�TON AND STATE Of OAE�ON s � b�.w+,.
�cxo: ecroeu+. i�'t
c�s't�.W.Nn..ty....
"+. • * . atw AIPHA EN6INEEl12NOJ INGORPORATED (y�K�d��M'tK K�tta�`tipwl i�i.i,we i•�
'011•."iitO"t Uf1 tJ.1[M1IR Rq.Mttt N �
rr w�w.
' � � . �N� ranuo.auw n:a � _�._W�4►�+iL..►
ia...a.e.���art r.a.�.'e. ue�
� .
!
. � � 12��1
i
;
..._ - _.. �
. •,•..._. ..._._.