Planning Commission Packet - 07/12/1983 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 12, 1983
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARD ROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD, OREGON
1. OPEN MEETING
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
(Available at meeting)
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-83 - Community Development Code
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 5-83 - Bond Park NPO #5
5.3 ROBERT RANDALL COMPANY - Sunnyside Estates NPO #6
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10-83 - Krueger 135th & Scholia
Ferry Road NPO #7
5.5 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS FOR NPO's #1, #5 & #7
5.6 ANNEXATION Brewer NPO #6
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. OTHER BUSINESS
8. ADJOURNMENT
pm(0103P)
["Ra°11"MMMigagakgliaMaWrligMil"IMMIIMIIMIMMIMIMIMIII.'
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
July 12, 1983
1. Meeting called to order at 7:40 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL: President Frank Tepedino, Commissioners Vanderwood, Owens,
Christen, Edin and Moen.
3. Planning Commission meeting minutes from June 21, 1983 were incomplete and
were not acted upon.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION:
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan stated he had two
letters he had received regarding the Community Development Code and
would be submitting them to the Commissioners during the public
hearing.
Also, he informed the Planning Commissioner that Jeremy Coursolle
would be leaving the City as he had accepted another position.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
• President Tepedino opened the public hearings by reading the
procedure to be followed during the meeting.
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-83 Community Development Code.
• Associate Planner Coursolle explained that the same process used for
the previous public hearing would be followed.
Public testimony on Article I - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
• Kevin Hanway, Staff Attorney for the Home Builders Association of
Metropolitan Portland, submitted four pages of concerns. He stated
he had not listed them by article, but would like to submit the
complete letter to address all the articles at this point. Staff
requested he speak to each article as they are addressed.
Public Testimony on Article II - PROCEDURES FOR DECISION MAKING
• Kevin Hanway, referenced letter submitted, covered items in Article
II.
o Herman Porter, 11875 SW Gaarde St. requested that section 18.05
be added to this section waiving fees for the NPOs.
--7-77777-1
o Carl Johnson, 6155 SW Bonita Rd. Lake Grove, began addressing issues
in the Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document.
Staff explained that his issue is being handled as a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment and it is scheduled to be heard before the Planning
Commission on August 8, 1983.
Public Testimony on Article III - ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS &
REQUIREMENTS
o Reynold Kordatsky, Solder Shack, 8900 SW Burnham F-24, submitted a
letter explaining difficulties explaining culties he had encountered by leasing easing space in
the CBD zone. He requested that the Planning Commission assist him
in retaining he business in this location. Lengthy Discussion
followed.
o President Tepedino requested staff to research and help resolve the
issue.
o Carl Johnson asked why additional set backs are required in a CP zone.
o Kevin Hanway, Home Builders, requested R 4.5 be change to 7,000 sq.ft.
o Mildred Gloria Johnson, stated there is nothing in the code which
addresses the residential area in the CBD zone.
Associate Planner Coursolle explained that the area Mrs. Johnson was
concerned about had been zoned A-12 and that the policy was in the
Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document.
Discussion followed.
o Douglas Bollam, 3072 Lake View Blvd. , Lake Oswego, requested under
section 18.64.030 permitted uses for Commercial Professional that
restaurants be listed. Specifically for the area north of 217 and
west of Pacific Hwy, known as the GM Training Center.
o Herman Porter, representing NPO # 3, strongly opposed changing R 4.5
from 7,500 to 7,000. They also opposed Mobile Home Parks being
permitted in low density zoning.
Public Testimony on Article IV - OVERLAY DISTRICTS
o Paul W. Hughes, Engineering Geologist, representing DJB, Inc. and
Mrs. Ball presented information to the Planning Commission that he
had gathered concerning Mrs. Ball's property. He had examined her
property and found it free of problems. The ground level water is
49' and any drainageway would have to be man made.
o Kevin Hanway, Home Builders, referenced his letter regarding
developing areas being developed as PDs, they opposed this idea.
Also under 18.80.260 - He suggested a change in language to "concept"
rather than site plan.
President Tepedino requested staff to summarize. Associate Planner
Coursolle responded with staff's intent, but stated they did not
oppose the Home Builders suggestion.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 2
Public Testimony on Article V - SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
• Director of Planning and Development submitted a letter from Geoff
Petrie requesting a "statutory way of necessity" be incorporated into
the Community Development Code.
Kevin Hanway, Home Builders addressed section 18.92.020(A)(1), (4) and
18.156.080 per letter submitted.
RECESS 8:55 P.M
RECONVENE 9:10 P.M.
Public Testimony on Article VI - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
• No public testimony
Public Testimony on Article VII - DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan submitted the letter
from Martha Bishop which applied to this section.
Public Testimony on Article VIII - LAND DIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
• Herman Porter, NPO # 3 representative, requested that on Page
VIII-22, under Minor Collector, Moving Lanes the number be change
from 2-3 to just 2 moving lanes. Also requested a criteria for
exception to development of existing streets should be incorporated
into the code.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED:
• President Tepedino requested staff to review all public input, then
walk the Planning Commission through the document at the next meeting
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 5-83 Bond Park NPO # 5
Request for a 24 lot subdivision on 3.76 acres, consisting of 23 lots
and one existing house. Also, approval of a Sensitive Land Permit to
allow for construction of a sewer line within the 100-year floodplain
• Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval
with conditions.
• Ken Waymire, 11903 Broadacres N.E. , Hubbard, Or. 97032, had no
additional comments, but was available to answer questions.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• No one appeared to speak.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - July 12, 1983 Page 3
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• Commissioner Owens was concerned there would be an erosion problem.
Associate Planner Newton stated the last condition addresses that
problem.
• Associate Planner Newton requested that condition number seven be
deleted, as the applicant had change his application since that
condition had been written.
• Commissioner Edin questioned if there is adequate buffering. He also
requested clarification of the zoning of surrounding properties.
Discussion followed.
• Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to approve
Subdivision S 5-83 with a change from duplexes to single family
dwellings per staff's findings and recommendations and removing
condition number seven.
5.3 SUBDIVISION S 6-83 Sunnyside Estates NPO # 6
A request by the Robert Randall Company for approval of a 22 lot
subdivision on 3.46 acres with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square
feet.
• Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval
with conditions.
• John Gibbon, 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. , representing Robert Randall
Company explained that they had incorporated all the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and redesigned the subdivision to
accommodate the 22 lots which had been approved by the City Council.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Tom McGuire, 9975 SW Sattler, object. j to the addition of another lot
since the Planning Commission had already approved a 21 lot
subdivision.
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
• Commissioner Moen questioned if the turn-around is going to be
permanent or temporary as noted on the drawing. Mr. Gibbon responded
that it would be permanent as requested by the Planning Commission.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
s Commissioner Moen requested a copy of the previous submitted
subdivision proposal. Commissioners reviewed designs.
• Commissioners Moen, Owens and Vanderwood did not like the flag lots.
• Commissioner Christen felt the applicant had addressed all the issues
and the subdivision should be approved.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 4
• Commissioner Moen commented that the applicant had two things in his
favor, one, the subdivision borders church property that will
probably not develop in the near future. Two, most of the lots are
larger than 5,000 sq. ft. in this planned development.
• Commissioner Moen moved and President Tepedino seconded to approve
Subdivision S 6-83, based on staff's findings and recommendations.
Motion carried by majority of the Commissioners present,
Commissioners Owens and Vanderwood voting no.
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10-83 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 2-83
Krueger/135th & Scholls Ferry Rd. NPO
# 7
The City of Tigard is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from
Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to City of Tigard
designation Medium-High Density residential (13-20 units per acre) on
approximately 90 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is
A-20 (Multiple Family Residential); from Washington County
designation 0-9 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium
Density residential (6-12 units per acre) on approximately 38 acres,
the requested underlying zoning district is A-12 (Multiple Family
Residential); and from Washington County designation Neighborhood
Commercial to City of Tigard designation Commercial-Neighborhood on
approximately 4 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is
C-N (Neighborhood Commercial).
• Associate Planner Coursolle made staff's recommendation for approval
for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. He
requested that the Planning Commission include tax lots 700, 800,
1300, 1301 and 1302 in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as Medium
High density.
• Eugene Fulop was concerned that he would get medium/high density. He
was satisfied with staff recommendation.
• Marlin Hoffer was concerned if he was outside the Boundary. He asked
who decided what properties would be included in the annexation.
Discussion followed regarding annexation.
• Russell Krueger stated he had only included those properties where
the property owner had signed the petition for annexation. Also
there is an LID for 135th which has been in the works for 1 1/2 years.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• Discussion followed regarding the Urban Growth Boundary and areas of
interest.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 5
o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend
approval to City Council of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 10-83
including the six tax lots that were not annexed, and approve Zone
Change ZC 2-83 with a note that the C-N zone may be moved if
necessary because of the road configuration.
Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present.
5.5 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS FROM NPO # 1, 5 & 7.
o Director of Planning and Development made staff recommendation for
appointment of J B Bishop to NPO # 1; Ella C. Hink to NPO # 7 and
Gerald W. Edmonds to NPO # 5.
o Commissioner Christen moved to recommended that the City Council
approved the application of these three individuals to their
appropriate NPO.
5.6 ZONE CHANGE ZC 6-83 City of Tigard/Brewer Annexation NPO # 6
o Associate Planner Newton explained how the procedure works for
proposed annexations and made the staff recommendation for approval
of ZC 6-83 upon approval of annexation to the City of Tigard.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Waynetta Chamberlain 16720 SW 108th opposed allowing apartments on
the proposed property. Discussion followed regarding the
Comprehensive Plan process. She was extremely disturbed that the
designation had changed on property that had been established through
the public hearing process and was again changed without them being
personally notified. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the
Comprehensive Plan process and involvement in the Neighborhood
Planning Organization.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioners consensus was that there was no basis to deny the
request.
o Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to
approve Zone Change ZC 6-83 per staff's findings and recommendations.
Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
o Director of Planning and Development announced that John Butler had
been appointed to the Planning Commission and should be attending the
next meeting.
Meeting adjourned 10:50 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 6
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE /_,
ROLL CALL:
Frank Tepedino Vw
Chris Vanderwood
Don Moen Ito
Bonnie Owens.4
Mark Christen
Phil Edin
Deane Leverett A
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6915
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 `
yM L, gal Notice Advertising /Vt
/jai
• • ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY OF J 1983
City of Tigard ;
• P.O. Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit r'GAR
Tigard, Oregon 97223
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON,
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss,
Susan Pinkley
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard Times
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at_ ga , Oregon in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
PUBLIC HEARING
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for—flnc' successive and
consecutive in.the,.following issues:
June 30, 198.3
t
Subscribed"
b ri • _ -
u sc bec�an � � - r'
r,.
and, o�met ,
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires: February 24, 1986
AFFIDAVIT
•
---------- il
1 r;
Y s l e
....4
OREGON
pp K
The following will be considered by the Tigard Planni
Tuesday,kJuly 12,;1983, at 4mmissioner,W.
Pacific H .lrur � hoof' Board Room 13 37 S.
fling Directtoor at 112755"S.W.-As'
S W.Ash Tigard0Or.87223 o by calling 6304171.toe Plan
PUBLIC
H
E
ARI G
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
Community Development' a .
•
Gad.
5.2 : SIUBDIVISION BOND PARKS #5
A request by Waverly Construction Ch:,..,,,fora 12}lot subdivision dq S 76
acres,'consisting of 10�duplexes,one trilex and one existing„house,The
property;is designated medium density and is•zoned A-12 Also,approval
:1.0f a Sensitive:Lands Permit to;allow,for construction'of a:sewer line
'within the 100 year floodplain.Located at 15880 S.W. 79th.Ave.°(Wash.
�Co Tai Map'2S1 12C lots 800;40(120005:
5.3 ROBERT,RANDALL COMPANY; Sunnyside Estates
A len t for'a 22 lot.subdivision,with minimum Lots of'5 000 .NPO #6
3.18 acr s of.land.Property is des sei, a R-
,5R lgna�'medium�denslty.apd Is zoned R-
,D ,Located. 15280 S.W, 100th Ave. (•Wash Co.Tali Map/S1 1`ICA lobs
5700 thru 7100.)'+
'5.4 •• COMP,REHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMEN
:135th&Scholls,Ferry Rd KRUEGER
A request by the Ci of T NP0 nt
7roretei e t , f 18ard for a Co,..., pensive,plan.Amendment
n$ton County designation 0-24;ulnits peracres to City of Tigard
,designation medium high`density residential (13-20 its per acre) on
approximately.89 acres,from Washington County;designation.;0-9.units
per acre'.to City of Tigard`designation medium'density residential;'(6-12
units per acre)on.approxilmately 38 acres;and-from Washington County
design done eighborhood Coma►er'ciai;to°.City of,Tigard designation,com=:
density residential:Wash.Co)Tax Map S1 33 I Tax L ea,100- 108,300
(part of),900 and'1000„Tax Map.2s1 4B,Tax lots'1'00.and;0-(part of)
medium density residential;Wash.Co.•Tax Map 231411,Tax lot 101.:;(part_
of) commercial-deighborhood;.Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 4B,,Tax 40, t 101
(part of):
ZONE CHANGl �2 1 RUEGER S.W. 135th&S'choliiPerrY Rd.;I.,A requ by the City of Tigard,for a zone`ch NPO#7
County designation residers an8e from Washington:
(multi-family resid ential),on app 2roximately 3 Tama from i Wasohington
County:designation reaidentiai.0-9t,'to, City of Tigard A l2” (multi-family
•residential) on:approximately 38'acres, and from!..Washington County
designation neighborhood commercial to.Ct of Ti` d designating
(neighborhood commercial) ' gnation'C-s
5.5 NEIGHBORHOOD'PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS FOR
NPO'S 1,5''and 7.
ANNEXATION BREWER
A request by the City of NPO res
located south of Durham.ROadand west of SWe108th and:t thane .
zoning on the property from Washington,County,Rs-1 to Ci .`'of Tl -
20(W County Tax: t lY gard A-
asl►in�ton Map 2S115A�'sx lots 14Q0 and ie01)� , '`;•Written comments are'ems i submit written comments 40-the
Ping D� at the above add In advance of fthe.public hearing'da{e.
TT6915 ` .rune 30,19183, -
vk:i•t - '
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST . SIGN THEIR NAME
and'note their address, on this sheet., (Please Print your name)
ITEM/bESCRIPTION: 60 n '( .
+I ��1 � ll ��ii
W — c.x i e�v1S"!`ir�l l.�+� ►c ,rte. l , �Yr1 1 i�1.4•
')j,. I�Di1)fS1l?Y'� : "� .
PROPONENT (For)' 1/ ,OPPONENT- f (against)' .
Name;''Address. 'and Affiliation: . ':.Name, Address and` Af$:iliation•. ,
�� • o « ; / o -
(-6-.4),(,1d /), ,pQ n u i 1S- 2,c) S'Li!`L Q'47
ril/4�.CI (n.yv-�, 1, - r.
J y
i1
.saws:. �wwo,
j
1
f •
. ,.•. .
7/
Ut11 L'
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST , SIGN TEEik NAME
and'note their address. on this sheet.: (Please Print your name)
ITEM/bNSCRIPTION t ty!t'1�� ' • �L ! C '=tjL
PROPONENT .. .(For) � r: c OPPONEN 'i 4 (rai�gainst) , °
Name,''Address and 'Affiliation; • Name Addres's and f Aft
•
•
•
•
•
•
,,. �,ilistion
.t, •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
A
t om` �I r DE VELO CODE PUBLIC HE&RIPIal
Ztk i2 l 1593 _
_
PLANNING COMMISSION — t Slut UP TO TES '2 Y
NAME ADDRESS 0(CHECK IASUE YOM WISH TO TESTIFY ON)
o i G =,
o m W 0 y
U) :11 0,1 � C
. ,.i . CO
60 •. a ao, a C ai OTHER (Please specify)
w 0 r4 ,4 + B IV o 0
o w = 0 CA •ra 4 r-+ 0 0 .-+ 0
� w .r4
ou od co ? 0 ›
z z o
.,a 8 W o c?, m W W
.ti .b .14 00 u CO GJ A •r4 0 •r4 A. 0
o C! CO G`+ t0 r-4 r-1 '•! ,-+ 0 rl
N V ••4 •d V H W N 0J 0 •.4 b d
0 H W OO 4 0 • R+ Q3 I d
r-r. ill AN •.1 0 Cr) Cr) A4 ..1A
===x=za====sa=ss=mz==ass=sa sx=s=aaaaa=n=-asasxQa=osa===91¢sz same= _3acas -
2. D. n
tt le)/� /�to Lt/v®0 vs rA 7i rut- , ii
/i-T /,),1,H1 t DJ g 01' Q I(L 1-- I
. , r o U S W I U el-1 h/i-n.
i ,
i e S� c
� t}
( .r/ / J -
(fr u�- r.-r� U4' g Ivt3
__„,-,, ,-2 _
11 X
ti ouYias `1 1\ 3®-)L La1c,�VL _L. X
,� ii-i-PO X
F � �
1,4,,, t .�
C C v f6y b: .UtM C /
Sunday, June 24, 1983
Dear Mr. Monahan: City of Tigard Planning Director:
Copies to Council-Planning Commission-NPO's Subj: Accessory Buildings
Thank you for forwarding on to me e 1979 Edition on Group M, Division I
information. May I now, at this time, within a few days, receive from you Section 103
Appendix Chapter 11 for agricultural buildings (Exception: Where applicable).
Noted in your June 21st letter reference to private garages, carports, sheds
and agricultural buildings come under MI noting these types of structures are permitted
in residential areas. How does our current Comprehensive Plan address R10-R7 zoning
agriculture 4 pole metal buildings with galvanized roof requiring no on site inspection
except when adding electricity a State of Oregon license is required?
From the information furnished me accessory buildings may be 300' with 10'
height (300' being ground floor area). "Barns" showing /00' ground floor area and
one story (is one story 30'-25'-20'-15'-12' or less?) on one acre? The Planning Dir.
shall review plans and make conditions on site review-for accessory buildings over
120'. Sites under 120' or agricultural buildings do not require on site inspections?
In your letter you state "the City is not proposing to establish any type of
architectural design review related to any structurd". Note in the proposed Comprehensive
Plan no materials are in language form for R7-R10 or any other zaing? Egress and ingress
, if needed, is addressed during the initial review of an accessory structure proposal
plan. T his review does not include accessory "barns-agriculture buildings"?? What about
materials on agriculture accessory buildings "whereas galvanized metal roof will either be
painted brown, or will be reroofed with shake shingles or other acceptable roofing
materials in established neighborhoods to retain the character of the area? Example:
The City of Tigard in-'1982 without notice to adjacent home owner's issued a permit #3318
for "MI storage" yet it has been used as a full garage complete with trailer pickup
and electrical machinery contrary to the intent of the permit being MI "storage"
agriculture designation was indicated and there is no on site inspection in this
established R10 neighborhood (the Deed Restriction was ignored)? Gravel roads were
created for "barn" egress and ingress. According to your recent letter the Director
shall "review" accessory sites but no language on roads exists, nor materials? Permit
#3318 indicates a height of 12' yet the "agriculture barn" sits 18' high on the lot and
measured 24'3" length and 24'5" width and having a galvanized shiny roof adding 5' to
heights No on site inspection having been classified "agricultural storage?".
During my research on the Legislative intention of no on site inspection for
agricultural accessory buildings the State of Oregon farmer's asked for an "emergency"
structure and so this exception on agricultural buildings was created with limited use
in certain zones. Your June 24 letter confirms: "According to the Uniform Building Code
all structures, except agricultural buildings as defined by ORS, over 120 square ft.
are required to complete an on site inspection".
Under 18.139.030 D: The Dir. shall approve, approve with conditions or deny
any application for an accessory use of structure. The Dir. shall apply the standards
set forth in Sec. 18.130-150 of this Code when reviewing an application for a variance.
18.139-030 E-1: The applicant may request a hearing ,before the Commission if the action
of the Dir. is to deny or to approve with conditions. My question is during the process •
30 days PRIOR to applicant's original request mailed notices be given to owner's of
record within 100' so that one is informed on his neighbor's intent and how it will
affect his property. (We never rec. any notice?) Seems as though only when the applicant
does not agree with Dir. conditions or approval may he appeal to the Commission? Why,
is all this power given solely to the Planning Dir.-?
18-139-030F2- Allowing Chairpersons of an official recognized neighborhood
Planning Organization, if the property which is the subj. of the application lies wholly
or partially within the boundaries of such organization notice? This Code provision has
II 'faults' as currently areas have not been contacted by the NPO Chairperson having
appeared without benefit of NPO input. ��y�',.,'�� /l I!.? .4 8i5 d
GEOFFPETRIE ASSOCIATES
REALTORS CONSULTANTS
DiggiERVI3D
July 5 , 1983 ti li JUL 81983
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING DEPT.
Mr Bill':.Monihan
'•Plaiining 'Director
'�Ciile:of .Tigard
•'127'55 •.SW- Asti.
' Tigard , :OR • 97223
Dear Mr. .Monihan,
I certainly enjoyed talking to you on the .phone and look forward
to meetingf,you in ,the ,future. ` In ;regards• to our conversation
land-
locked •tle` .89 acre parcel of land which is currently
.locked between ;Art Verharen s 2 .55 , acre parcel and the Genetal
'Motors property, I would ask that you consider the following:
A. The .89 acre parcel was purchased from the State
Elighway Dept in July of 1981 The State has_ been
r'eciii . .payment$ i n,the property 'since°Ith�att time
��..,'j i- } ' x'35 '.ta !(1,! 4..a.C. T� ,v1'0{'�,. i r'',.y,r�l,t rl:�t .1.*s` .c:',�.,"pt: k -e aj x• ?p 1,tt,9./q'3i4 P _:.f„1y4l. it}„: }ky,�.M, 4 .1�1•1� f ..'}J,',:.. ?t f' "lam .i ' J9 wa. r per aY ei5�omM� ' 9n J • S 14``0 4 ''
`„,p7:01` ,;is tt l h1 >e: , � -. 4 t.. s ,[♦..:.xx� , .; l„,..( 9A4 r iIOD- A; 1 1^, S�2.2:t . .` t 1� +x i1 h� .+, 1. '}as;F' L1 b .ho_. A�p7�1� �1 ty�y� i,�.. j+y�:. eIL� i ' s.+” .r ' °,,t $ -'t �' ri$.4,....S?a l{ rte'.: �� r ,:'tP.',: r, �e1 4 11!, a ii 'ti a tL.il,. �4: m�n:i"lig,i•-�r' YC.1E �1, y n i� =IP {!,ik, i3''��S{�`i�t � ,��(� t .n"k`, .?l+� r .fir._�.� r�t;.i� 1� .q k• „t ,iu'�': tYP•1'+}^!ieS!,rX' > q`;i�. Jr i A.A:�y�q. pti Y��'' L i Z..�ii•ta 'Yti, '''?l�h 1"�'i��
r '1 tK �t 4 �} R t f}t ^cs A' 0' `IVii! �. l s� } tt ':tf��`!, ;� 1 •V`�;y t Ka+... , t t.yo i.p has 7 3
.” �• � a?,��{fit F`�j�t��C,� 4� �y�to-, leniMtty}.L7 l},, h + {.
4.`. ','''41'' r .. ','1-:b{a ))47 4 40r�.^ < a �l iet y �'A,4;',1 i 1 r cM. �Sr i a a,,,;! �Y 14:9: '20 t ° ;'li'''. . {4t;4',%•' Y ..
1{� �, 't��,f+ 1i.fa"!' !y�`"' .5{x r ;�'{h{ i t *.i t1`�y!4,,r5t � 5f+1e:t� k4ttX}'a,r •. r a� �t '
' ;',1*„:‘,.`::,:', 4 * �j21', 5 t i.7. 'ItAt'*e-1.441 °everyone, s be'$t, titere'st `to see theNC,f,,y's
` a is
a is F'f'r ,y ltd a a! �t yv"titT'•S ir�� ai. ri t ,{
�3 ,�;'g! t aax u6aseA`deve .roped to its ;full !'potential.V Thhis ,<4k •
'� • ''rt g, `parcel- of''propexty"•developed could'yaadd•'sign 'ficantl.y
" to'. the,'tax :base. ; Because- of its current zoning of
commercial%professional . and its freeway• vi'sibility.
,� it has great potential, for development in conjunction
with Mr.. Verharen's property.
C - I •would':.],ike.;-you to consider;putting !aT;provision in
:'• the Community: Development Code similar to `the State.
of,.Oregdn's "statutory” way of necessity" ,•which , .
`states t " a County Board of Commissioners lcan impress
� ;any easement over. :one' 'private: owner to open'tacGess tb,
ilie =land-locked parcel 'of another 'privates party'.`"' • '"
Perhaps another idea might be that any future develop
ment cif Mr. Verharen' s property be subject to proper
access to the ,.89 acre parcel . As 1 mentioned over
the phone, I believe there may be' some precedent for
this' type of requirement in Clackamas County.
•
Page 1 of 2
• 29870 SW.Parkway PO BOX 751 Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 (503)682-3076
•
Page 2
There are probably many other questions to be answered, so please
feel free to contact. ,me either at home or at the office. I
want to thank you for your consideration in this manner.
Sincerely,
®/ /
4 /6 .
Geoff Petrie .
GP/lt
Enclosure
•
•
1,'
•
29870 S.Partway PO Box 751 Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 (503)682-3076
It
k bW Is°t JVY i/`t . _v • 11/41 141 • '
Cnmpl rnen s of
T(TLE INSURANCE COMPANY wA-s1(tNGION ' COt'rlt�l':f Y'°•'O �EGON
SAFE:CO 297-49411 /�J
SCALE 1"= 00` /
1 1E
/5"-/° � c c.•
W
SEE MAP
e
Si)) 4 ., $ S I '6 CH
o + S W as --P F F L E-::... . . .• R
• 400 I 300 20":0 100 I
p+ 'r I /23le 1 2�g4c 256Ac
,F: • As " " . „ . __...
. • . 1, -. a ,
. .: ..10.
st 7 v•" •
w e ■
V
r1 '1
p • b
1
t
�
a s
01«y
• a
r
M Y N....%ess.. 'V
0 1
f• 1r \r ,
Y • s
{
ZS y• hra L 4t4 �� ,
nrt.ttom�,, Try , ` ti �`T(.i . ; �•. ,� �-' .r�
f
FIR i4tjyt' k 1 X.1; bY i f', t 4 i y r .k e I . . •• • � �
r` + ' ; `r w t r , C �r. CgJ Y s� '4 r 4 i.t r {, . � � (
A'..
4 �..r .:;-. � a.•e � re
� - '
o0SOM L.�✓∎�a� / .
- wa•)o..
.FFF77� I•. r •
` StallOgistqc=mommullem:rmainnamumainsima t; ; ••••••••---
.�
r`. • ` ''' , .,..,.... ,.... > . : . .....
C4 Vt. \ II . •;•• i mr.J.L..j.n..mrsit, Ix,
N.is /L `\
Sa itQst \``� `•
.,\ / . \ _ . ^ *, a . - -4ele.7\
\ • %* °�.•
; A ! ,..
''',•:,I ; • , - .; ..,( ,
(
,'' ,,,. Governmental Restraints on PriA...... Ownership Rights • - ;-;,'
,,,, .
Under the "allodial sytem,' recognized in the United States,which permits private parties the right to
• '''. own title to real property, the title holder has a myriad of rights of ownership. However, there are
.t
,
. . certain rights which government possesses which are a restraint upon the freedom of the private
landowner.
. 1. Eminent Domain-this is the power of any governmental body to claim private property for a
- public purpose. This is accomplished through the process known as condemnation. When such
i ', occurs, the private owner must be paid just compensation which can consist of the fair market 1.
• •' .1 value of the actual property taken plus severance damages for the diminished value of any remnant •' ,..;„ ., :, ,,,,
•-,:,..: , ,••••4,,'4, '3:,PrOPerlit v%: . -1 •• :if..
I. ,!. . •
.., -J. •-•-:'--' ,.-• '• ,1): In Oregon, the power of eminent domain, by statute, can be used by a railroad or private utility ' \ ',.,, ,,•:,
14.'1';',1,•:=i,','„•:;....;'- ;',g',1,,-,company to acquire a right of, way easement.for extending railroad tracks or an electric power ' •',,". •;',.,:.,
1', •••'::,.. •,:;' 'line.',.‘Aisoi the "statutory,way'nf necessity: process whereby a_couralerd of Conapliasionra ,.. . , .:,..• „;•,,',, •
t ':';,,can ini'..ress an ease i; e • • • '• • • .•• ' '.." . •. • • cess to the landlockedjiarcel of another '':
;.;O:t.54:.;, :• ,.— tel. , is an'extensinn'Of the •over of eminent dom.-aim ', .- ,„. „ ... .. ...:::.,,,,.,.,.....•-:...!'";.;.:712';'':',%,,,-,:,;.''x',,:ffiA:,;',.: ',::
- 4:;;',''''' ', 2:,'''';po ice •owers-is e ri.'-t o govern*.r.en to enac r &Oita-We:controls necessary.for7the tiealth .:‘;•,:•')4.,,,t4fi,f-,•1;',;.'
le.",,'..,''.,-;... 5 . - :..) A. -- . .. , .
,,..,...,,,,'•::i,:....:.1 .•,f,1::...ksdetli.,,!,.1velfare pr.,Tin . IT:of.,society aa,a whole. Such powers have imposed restrainf.-iy or'itilyate,„',,,.;
4,,, ,`1-.:,,,;',!.,.:::', landowners in thi.fr4in'Of zoning laws and other'public land use controls,street aCceli(limitations*. ;..;,„;•;i:".."'••,' ,1,/ir;';',,,:•., ,
,44..A,,=•;',';.-V''''I: Onvironmental.'restrainti and the like,1" ' .•.. ': ' • ,' ' • . ••-, ",,•:.;••••.t.; :.,...;:•• :.,'•';',' ;., ;.,•:',1'."'.''''.. ,,'!-:i.-... .'
;•••,:iy,•,:-.-•',''';-; .
''.1. ,. ,.....`•:', :.1',,, '',-”Iii Oregon; cities l.lipie the authority from the Oregon Legislature to zone'property iince..1919....;' ••,,',,...,:.,1..i:Jt'!i:
q.
4•''':!:;.•,::••':::•;Caunties were grapteclauthOri °
ty in 1947 and.in'1969 the state entered the local ionint.iiibeeii`,;•:'
y•-•0.41.: 1,.,.z";;•••,,, ,,,g,' f".•- .' .,. ' . '• • . ,h !
. ' 't, -.':•:...''!,'''.: .
,j- 1)i:'.comp Oink local iniitif:of government to create Comprehensive Plans as overall ii,iiidelineafor'?
If's4i,-::',"`„ ;;;:'1;•!ii,:i..",•;',.Vit', '•'"lina use intl.AavelcoPineni. In 1973,'Senate Bill 1,00 (ORS Chapter 197) created the„Land Conseitr.:::., ,,:,i;„,,!,•;,,:::::,,;,•,[11.,, ,
2-Z`f,,ft-'4'''4,'„.',Y,''.V",•"•44.,,ciii ifici:tiogiopmrit,ConiniissiOn with the duty'to create state-wide'Planning guidelines and to..,'*, ,-,;.,'„,.;;-; :.,:,1:1-'•;;;,,•,,,i';',.'
I:41„..i.,4:•:'',•4:-,:',i1Y,,,!:`,1,','n'tconi tOran d'elotripelltiCat units,to follow' sush-guicielin. es, and.: .:':,;,,"„' . ',..1,:-..`...•-•,;. :.•,,,;;,.'':.;' .. ;',:.,•:..:'i''''.'„i•I'.. -".',;:.''
',,•;:i*A.,.214,th;';', ..,,,••.;,'.;..Based-„npon tii. policy power of governinent'whith permits laws and regulations whifhireresiort- :. .:: :::. .k...,,,i::,
j. ,,,Y1PL,Iihi,,::• .;$.-abl)k;necCsyaryt to.prOtecf the public health;safety,welfare or morals.'To be valid un er most eon...':,:o.. ....,..?,,4,2,4.i.
•Atk!.14-A.•.^:..y,, ..•;.,. . •,.1•,•.....,, . ',..a - - • , , • , .. •, . .I , - • .,x..4,i .i.,,,,r..•.c..i-,'•
;•;%'•.?,. strit!iPlzpiakistaiy!ar4s,•:.the public land use control must be reasonable, not discnmar to;ry,.or.arbit-,;' :„;:p;!.;,,,4,„,,,•;:;',,.,:,477:-,
i,;:4f,-,-',4,-;:;',41,,;:',:;•• •;,),,:t.;rarjf;:i401'applicii4Oti, and, nonconfircatory; (ho,v0erjia zoning'ordinance which is 0'a,Sorial .•0;•.,,t, ',444,g,,i,,..:
:..,f.,:„4,••,.4i,:f`,,•?:1,,X,Clialitfevert. it:t '''ti*ei'itifferssiC dollar 1Oss'iiiiitit,lieiniable'to Uie'the nareeVfOi:46 'gspiiitoielez4iii,4410;:i
'...;:,-.- •,;,,,:;.-1.6„)fl1/4.-aa,. .... , ..,:•;.4. ,x.. .i •- .F,;•;,,i'y ,. 11.1,-,'0.4'w:44,;..v'2.,if.,e rr,..: ,,,41040.,%", ic Tp.44,,,,,,;:-,,t,s.,:,,,i,Vi4. . ,f, liNV't,:`, c,,
1tic#00:$1•4111,7,y, ,41t104{{01*140110f,‘104*,04C)44041,10.:4°U.:•;;AP?'-,;!•,:q11470:':-.44W1- rqt04itC4•.,Ti".'.•.".: , p'4'
V :i:y1:14alzIA 01040 ''.itilgi,4441'1i404.-40:io' .44.-44e joi4.0:::40iiii44".R'iii...tir rtItiOPP.41:*-ti .61.
)
q''''';''''''"•''":=''''IS.' 'ere i'f'cCornli. 'hiniivePlaii..arid/ortzOning Pro.v4iOnIi in e'ffect,po landowner.ma' seprOperty;•;:,...z.v.e.4, •,,1:•••.k, '--
.',,,• ,0.,.:,--Pt,,,,A''•;:i,-;:.,:•i.•,i'7‘4.1.,i•:','h',".. ,.. 7 -.•..,•;" .; ...''''•7. •:,•'; . ''N'•;•••••:-, -.1 '• ,'*.1;i1.`••+ - ' h, •'''.' ' 1 . • ' • ' ,,ily.•••••, , & ..•,•' .• •• ;t11:11'''' i$,-',';').:',4e,(,:-
` ..c:•, ,,,,■t),.! ...ii,•,,. APOR la; t•;191;:01! 401 FF,P.V,!!!Ons''.1,447;f12suc4. C),oF9ri tile governmental body Ply.'f4e;., ,•.tt ;°P.J°1 -•;5`,f0 k„''
3, 1
„„ is
K.., --,',,•:,'"\.,;.`.$•',.',.'Y',1';;Iiit:$014;ting,e, eli;friftt.(Cotitinuling4;stich iise ."0,yen to'the, extent that a violating i4, c'tUre Onthe, I,,Ispl),;,•;i,
parcel be rem, e4, Should the governmental !)04,, fait:Lto act, a private citizen of t .; urisdiction
„,;;;;•4,4, . 4,-..:1-•..:,
F7,,gilt-r;V:'fiTiittillied mai: itiate:the litigation.Criminal penalties against the violator,may_also e.exacted in •,• ,1,,-.;,4,,,,,V5,:::' '•
p:;,,•;;i0-,t,.1417,:v,,,,,,,A=..,..., . .. h. •rg.P., ; . , ,
appropnate cas s.'1,,4,--,-,4.v:,. :. , . : •!.. .: '• , ,- -
**'-.:4',:f.;‘,:j'' '.i.'''''2: ..!•7-s„;.,.., . . • • • ', i l•':';. ',.'i''•:,,, -i':;.:', ..ig•Oftifj:-.1.-•:: %'.'r i.<
,...,,,,,ppric4,i 4.:•-• :... \ Pre-existin JNIon-conforming Use .... ,:,2 • , :•`' '',-' ''• 4 - !..,•;,.;
An exception t .: the„above statement exists,in the instance;where alandowner 1,44' log'ra,parFel'Aii,,,:y0,,'•,)!At
a''4ertain Wa 'riiiii,:4i'i:thi''..enaetineni of'theioning or comprehensive code piohili 'ions,',Tfiii;lii' ,;;9&,Ylle,..'
c
,. . ,
• ; -v.,:.,.7,-., 1
&lc to a princi le of American law that prohibitions in.law cannot be retroactively'l Plied..piiii`::!;';;;:.L.PA",:....miti....
,',•'.;-..."':::.:14.1'`;`.-',1'. ..'-:,.`,''...l.. sUCh 4.Lando ..eri;has a."grandfather's right” to continue the pre-existing use'even uch law is'
4
Y,, ::.- not in confornii0,,with the changefin the law.' In inosi'jurisdictions, however, such right is only .:::'•1.4:,,i'g,--kWg:.•
,;.;, r
' ,, .;:, %,. glIp
to,Continue;not t.4 expand,such pre-existing use,Thus',a wood frame'dairy barn on property liseQ ...n,),„v.A.r:
tal a dairy.befOre a zone change to "residential use only"Could be repaired but not reconstructed'-- % !,,!''r'..,1•A',1,1;;
'.. kif::.:'4,11,,t,:'::.:?..T.•'With conerete4bloCk;'Construction, of' any other construction technique which lengthened the nor-, ; ., :. !•,,:Av:,,;;1'.
i
mal economiC,Iife•of the structure .In some jurisdictions, a pre-existing use structure which is ,. IT'•'. ; rntitf•:„.'
destroyed by fire or other casualty cannot be rebuilt. . ' '''''It-•
,, . . ",, ,:, ti,:A:, ' .
;. :., •.
:.; Variances,Conditional Use Permits;and Zone Changes
' :,• ;•••••.•."44,,...,.;:,. -.••,, . ,
•';',.''''•,...11,,,,:,;,''.,.;
''''' '"''''''';:;',1:'.... ,;y,:..k;...•
.,-.-;;;: ;;',,• • , ..Under Oregon law, a variance is-a-recitiest of a landowner to use property contrary to the per-,,••;•.., ,•;'•»,•'" Ijr:.1, .
r
fi...;' ''....:,''.:... mitted use, due to unusual hardship imposed on the specific tract by the zoning code. For instance;:i.,,,..,,,`,::', 1'44
yi„,,,,••„;„' .• '',.. . ; a parcel in a "residential use only" area may have no practical possibility for residential use be . :, ".,•1.4;-;,'
cause it abuts a busy highway. The governmental body may weigh the request and find that the
'' '. ' --, 74,•,',i,:...,,* .,;.•..!;a0.,:..,,
r,id., 't..•.. ,.. . . , i• .
. .
, • .?. .s,'.4...,,:. .',1.'1.ry&l. •
. ... ' , .
,
22 . ; ;
,
. .
. .
,
'•
1
,..
s1
2. Non-Freehold Estates
These interests are held by those who rent or lease property and are a mere personal prop-
erty interest sometimes called a chattel real
a. Estate for Years. An interest or estate in land for a fixed period of time,such as a year I
' a month, or week. Usually created by a lease, with the owner of an estate in land trans-
ferring use of the land to another person in payment for rent. By so doing, the owner
relinquishes his right to occupy the land for the period of the lease. The tenant,in I
turn, has agreed to pay rent for this period.The tenant does not own the land but has
aoquired a leasehold estate. A modern and better title of this interest is an estate for a
stated term. 1
' b. Estates from Period to Period: These continue from one d mated period of tim%to ,
another (year to year, month to month, etc.) and automatically renew until one Oarty
, = , gives the other the proper notice of teretunation. y I•
' c. Estates at Will This is a tenancy created with the consent o the landlord,intended'to
continue for an indefinite period of time It may be created by express agreement or I
• ; by operation of law. A tenancy at will is created when a tenant enters into,possession' 4
under an agreement for the execution of a lease for a specific time,but the lease is i
,.; never reduced to writing.Courts have ruled that,where a tenant goes into possession of ,
• ' . a property under a lease which is never executed,a tenancy at will exists. .
te 'd. Estates at Sufferance: Where a month-to-month tenant stays on the premises (after .
proper notice to vacate has been served), or if a lessee holds over after the expiration of
a lease, we have an "estate at sufferance." It is not really an estate in land as the tenant
1 ' is wrongfully withholding possession of the property and may be legally evicted at the
V+ ti t tt landlord's demand.
{ .
4., .4. Non-Possessory Interests-Which Are Not Estates in Land — .Sonne non-possessory interests n
`'• ., :i,ri. . . , are regarded as an incorporeal interest in real property only ann thus provides,..the holder
A t.. S 1 a mere:limited right to use property of another.These are not cd'hsidered as estates in land
' The common types of such non-possessory and non-estate interesLiz include:,. ',, '.'
�,x a. .. Easements
*Right to use another's property.
' , *Irrevocable by the Grantor.
``r 1. Appurtenant
f',W *benefitting aspe,:ific parcel of property.
*benefitted parcel called Dominant Estate or Tenement •
i . *subjected•parcel called Subservient Estate or Tenement
t,, *BENEFIT..ALWAYS CONVEYED, WITH TITLE TO DOMINANT ESTATE•s ,- 2. In Gross
a 7 q 7w *not benefitting a specific parcel of property.
'"` p�L�,b,i. *personal right to grantee.
a a *n. , errable, exce't or commercial easements in • oss wh•ch, because of•
•
" invest„ •,t an' necessit are transferrab
b. Licenses
*Limited privilege to use another's land
*Revocable at will of landowner.
EYC ION where . ',eration •aid,not to revoke without stated cau '
c. o it a Pendre
*Right to take part of soil (gravel, minerals, oil, gas, etc.) or products from land
(crops, etc.)
19
P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES
INOORPORATGO
1590 WOODLAND TERRACE
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034
Telephone 503 — 636.2523
April 29, 1983
D.J.B. Inc,
11515 S.W. 91st Ave.
Portland, Oregon 97223
Re: Drainage Study, D. T.B. Inc. Property
Within S.E. 4 Sec. 36, T1S, R1W and
N.E. a Sec. 1, T2S, R1W
Gentlemen:
At your request I have conducted a reconnaissance survey of D.J.B. Inc.
properties adjacent to the Landmark Ford Agency on S.W. 66th Avenue.
Purpose of the investigation is to determine the source and disposition
of surface waters within the area, especially in relationship to the
proposed construction of the I-5 Haines Interchange.
• The natural surface drainage at the D.J.B. Inc. property is southwester-
ly. Over the years the drainage has been modified to accomodate develop-
ment and improvements. At the present time, surface runoff from the east
side of I-S is carried beneath I-5 and S.W. 66th Avenue to a drainage way
which flows westerly immediately north of the D.J.B. Inc. property.
Some of the runoff is carried by storm sewer and ditches from areas be-
yond the natural surface drainage. On April 21st, 1983, I discussed the
future drainage plan with the Oregon Department of Transportation survey
crew working at the Haines Interchange site. The party chief informed
me that the plan is to channel the runoff parallel to I-5 to the I-S -
Highway 217 Interchange.
The distribution of surface water on the D.J.B. Inc. property as of April
21st is shown on the enclosed map. The small area of saturated soil in
GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY
•
-2-
the northern part of the property is surface runoff along the drainage
way which receives it's flow from east of I-S. The larger area of satur-
ated surface soil is caused by a septic tank failure and possibly other
waters from the Landmark Ford Agency.
In summary, the D.J.B. Inc. property, historically was not an area of wet-
lands. The problem of poor drainage and soil saturation in a limited area
are the product of changes in land-use over the past 20 to 25 years.
•
I will be available for further assistence on an as-needed basis.
Respectfully,
co rIF/k.0
Gt ,
eeAc Ns�pJ ley OREGON
ar•AUL W. HUGHES
Paul W. Hughes, i -• 4✓
EIS
Engineering Geologist � ;
PWH/ah
Encl.
ll
•EC IIJ •.Y n FR:-.1I :.`It 1'1f.',I r:OF..Vl_Y '.."`6: CaEF.'1LL It it l'.-,.G ',M: r7 r IAtti..• `■ I.,C IA.,.
fa C •„.` d
,r a 0
} S.
I
( I I F'c:J PE V T f
1.114C.
11 N ( I \�
Z4'E1 a^57E tQ0 7
13.!_C.L_lC. I 13I_C.l i'._
` mot ) '� , I? ti `=ALE
`J C'-{c'-',7'r 100,Q. ('r, ,
1 111a. I rJ f7-"5'•.E -',--i c1c:,
BALL
/ �:, I .O 3 1 _—.�.. ---'t'' - .I 1 • c' I r^I o:?
r I i .C1 T —
( P. I r 0•I,I YI I FJF• ErPo E. FFI, Lug.:--�•a-
µO'' ' GALL 41 C'I ,I., ,_0,F71 �J !IJCCI A-C1■ ..EE `` 1
7.w7 3.27 i
I ..-- ......, \ ____......,_____...... ..:=1_. _ — . .
■ I } . 10.1,'.. r c ,
o CA \I I _ .0 c�t .I�'uJ. '_359.';jL: 1-
s
t. i - i W , t1:
y
h % I
k s 1 7 ? l�l JC II_C:i_li
N. >tii i , _
II ) # --- J 'du H T J
evl i'.•
F :i I ',J
-% . �0 0 037 C I-I`i .:2. ,"
>
aA. \� 107 z_— - '1!"-..o 41 W j 7.
1
T N.
W n I
h
o
_ __ fir, _
'J EL�ti'�- U FAST
-. fl — Ic,
F� ET _ -
,T �
V
I , I
I
I,,'1•I1,1
I •4
P. W. HUGHES &A*A IA'16,
'1500 WOODLAND 1•!.
a•:
LAKE OSWEGO.OREQfl
Telephone 603 e c
June 6, 1983
A ;
D.J.B. Inc.
11515 S.W. 91st Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97223
Re: Development Sui .abilit}, D.J.B. Property
Adjacent vacated S.W. Dartmouth
Between S.W. 66th 6 68th
Tigard, Oregon
Gentlemen:
As requested, I have expanded upon my original investigation to determine
if any of the property falls within the category of Sensitive Lands, as
defined in Chapter 18.57, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
Sensitive lands are those potentially unsuitable for development because
of 1.) location within. the 100-year floodplain, 2.) within a natural drain-
` ageway, or 3.) on steep slopes.
The property does not lie within a lowland nor adjoins a water course or
body of water which has or may be covered by floodwaters, and therefore, not
within any floodplain.
Chapter 18.57 defines drainageways "as those areas which convey significant
seasonal concentrations of water over the surface of the land." The term !,
"drainageway" is not used in the Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill,
or other available texts. I assume the term as stated refers to both chan-
nel or sheet flooding, neither of which takes place on the property.
Finally, steep slopes are defined as "portions of the ground surface which
i4r8°
' Std. , ,y, f a g \1't§
4 1
,
u ! i
44,411' a <1 GEOLOGY IiVDE1O OGY 5 ;
•
�
gar q�4 a" '
, -2 ,(
r� >
;r
have a slope of twelve percent or greater". Slope, normal to the contours ; ' ,,'
44'4 Yr;
across the D.J.B. property, measured on the Lake Oswego 7.5 minute Geolog- i r,c• i
J
ical Survey Quadrangle sheet, indicates vertical elevation difference of 'r` '
45 feet within a horizontal distance of 650 feet, which is a 7% slope. /
3..a
It is apparent that the l),J.B. Property is not within a sensitive zone as £
defined.
T, will be available for further assistance on an as-needed basis. `
Respectfully,; 4
k
` f `
Paul IV. Hughes,, +
Engineering Geologist
l'TIP/4 . r.4
cc: Fred Anderson j / OREGON ,\ \.,
1 Paul W HEH ! ,�.,
Attorney-at-I.,awv / - r... Wr_,r/ , / y .
88(15 S.V . Center o E 1
Tigard, Oregon 97223 \'�., c''� �o�'
T..
i a
',/' {4'1',.''
'• i,r *,t r ks: `�s s '.4.'•'4i..}1, l��yr c;4t°'�'F`�' '''''''4:4',[2',44 ` at T 0 � , 1
4, r F ,, 4 CP,d i q 4. R 6 Y ,; ,'„?',V,10111614,
-.
, i � F ^ .';.!t$',`,;:),,,10:-, ,r °•7 3
[ r 4 t` , r ,,{ a ,- 7 iv fq p N'? ' . b'� .1 4 j.#,S .'� ,
Ct, ,, ,411 k ct, , k 7 ' f d 4..���i rr, , .Z T '' _ v' .
,x ° x ` a [ 1/,, 1.4RV0r04 `,F' !k ,
P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
1590 WOODLAND TERRACE
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034
Telephone 503 — 636.2523
July 12, 1983
•
Mrs. Geraldine Ball
11515 S.W. 91st Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97223
Re: Development Suitability
Tax Lots 5700, 6300, 6500 & 6600; 23-81
Tigard 1S. 1 36DD
Dear Mrs. Ball:
I have examined the referenced lots to determine if any of the property
falls within the category of Sensitive Lands, as defined in Chapter 18.57
City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
Sensitive lands are those potentially unsuitable for development because of
1.) location within the 100-year floodplain, 2.) within a natural drainage-
way, or 3.) on steep slopes.
Your property is not within the 100-year floodplain nor is it located on a
steep slope (greater than 12%) . The centerline of a drainageway does, how-
ever pass through the northern edge of Tax Lots 6300 and 6600. I question
whether this is a natural drainage. Water in the drainage is transported
from properties east of Interstate 5 by culverts beneath I-5, S.W. 66th and
68th Avenues. It appears to be a man-made drainage.
It is my understanding that all surface runoff will be carried southward,
parallel and adjacent to S.W. 68th Avenue which will serve as the approach
to the south-bound on-ramp at the new Tigard Interchange.
GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY
C
_2_
Upon completion of the Tigard Interchange, all surface water runoff will
be channel-::d to the Public Right-of-way; and your property will therefore
not be within the "Sensitive Lands" catagory.
Respectfully,
GERTIN
Paul W. Hughes,
Engineering Geologist
..; .1 NH.NNCOES
Era
PWH/ah . Tr,
�.
P.W. HUGHES Etc ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
1590 WOODLAND TERRACE
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034
Telephone 503 — 636-2523
July 12, 1983
DJB Inc.
11515 S.W. 91st Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97223
Re: Ground Water Levels
Vicinity of D.J.B. Inc. Property
Tigard -I-5 Interchange
Gentlemen:
At your request I have examined the water well reports, on file with the
State Water Resources Department in Salem, in order to determine the depth
t
o round water
g in the area surrounding
g your property.
The source of ground water is from local precipitation which infiltrates
downward and laterally in a southwesterly direction. The aquifers are
located at several horizons between lava flows or within fractures which
have developed within individual lava flows.
The enclosed water well reports are representative of ground water depths
adjacent your property. The depth to ground water varies from 49 feet to
greater than 500 feet below the land surface.
Ground water beneath your property is estimated to be at depths which will
not hinder any potential development.
Respectfully,
con wit.°
11///747 PAWL W. HUGHES
Paul W. Hughes,
Engineering Geologist M EIS
ov
PWf I/ah tiR0p Gto4
GEOLOGY HYDROLOGY
r•a " P" t.,
U ' — . ;,.
State Well No , �t.. I `�!, ' '( 1
WATER WELL REPORT JUN8 -1
STATE OF OREGON JUN8 1993
VATER RESOURCES Dom, State Permit No.
(1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL:
Name John and L Onica ICohasi c County Clackamas Driller's well number 7-83
Address 4405 S:1 Redondo S v,NW v.section 6 T. 2S R. 1L W.M.
City Portland state OR 97231 Tax Lot# Lot Blk Subdivision
(2) TYPE OF WORK(cheek): Address at well location: 13707 SW Rod r-ers Rd.
Portland, Ore(-?on
New Well :o Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon❑
If abandonment,describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well.
Depth at which water was first found 539 ft.
(3) TYPE OF WELL (4) PROPOSED USE (check): static level 11L4 ft.below land surface.Date 5-6-83
Rotary Air ❑ Driven ❑ Domestic Xi, Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Artesian pressure lbs.per square inch.Date
Rotary Mud 0 Dug ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑
C ' Bored ❑ Thermal: Withdrawal ❑ Reinjection ❑ (12) WETI I LOG: Diameter of well below casing r
Depth drilled 555 ft. Depth of completed well 555 ft.
( ' CASING INSTALLED: Threaded l� Welded g Formation:Describe color,texture,grain size and structure of materials;and show
Threaded ❑ Welded �
6L i thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry
...."Diam.fromP11.1S..1 ft.to,:5hLO ft. Gauge .2.5.Q for each change of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level
"Diam.from ft.to.. ft. Gauge and indicate principal water-bearing strata.
(:DINER INSTALLED: r MATERIAL From To SWL
ii....„5....-Diam.from.53.6 ft.to,•555 ft. Gauge ,Y18.8 Cl•?y-silty-brown 0 21
(6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated?14 Yes ❑No goring lava-fractured 21 1113
Type of perforator used Torch Cinders-red 1113 152
pJ J
Size of perforations 1/8 in.by 12 in. Clay-red 1-2 167
8 perforations from 737 ft.to 5511 ft. Clay-sticky-brown 165 178
perforations from ft.to ft. Clay-silty-brown 178 292
perforations from ft.to ft. Clay-sandy-brown _ 292 297
Clay blue 297 ?.?2
(7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes j;;1 No Clay.-?ray 323 377
Manufacturer's Name Clay-sticky-tan 377 415
Type Model No. Clay-ye 11 OW 415 i,17
Diam. Slot Size Set from ft.to ft. Shale-?rey 417 433
Diam. Slot Size Set from ft.to ft. Clay-red 1133 4` 118
( 8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered Clay- ;m irranular-bro 148 L!84
• below static level
Sandstone-,rev-brown 4`_•4 497
Was pump test made? ❑Yes a$No If yes,by whom? 01 r-1; rr;nul?r-'or own 1197 539
gal./min.with ft.drawdown after hrs. Conglo 1erate-bro',Vn 539 775 11)4
Air test gal./min.with drill stem at ft. hrs.
Bailer test 20 gal./min.with 2 2 Eft.drawdown after 1 hrs.
Artesian flow g.p.m.
..•,i.rature of water 53 Depth artesian flow encountered ft. 1 h-•2 �_
Work started Ll9 19 83 Completed 7 1983
(9) CONSTRUCTION: Special standards: Yes?l'J No❑ Date well drilling machine moved off of well 5-7 1.983
Well seal—Material used Cement ,rout 1' Drilling Machine Operator's Certification:
• Well sealed from land surface to 1 d.8 ft. This . = was const under y direct su rvision.Materials used
'. Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal 6 10 in. and info on re.,. abov a to m st knowledge and belief.
6
Diameter of well bore below seal in. [Signed] Date 5-8 ,13....
(Drilling, ac a r)
Number of sacks of cement used in well seal 51 sacks Drilling Machine Operator's License No. 39 8
How was cement grout placed? p.�':. p?d t?lrou;h 1-inch D,_pe
.be.twe..e.n...1Q-i nch..1 o.1°....and...6-7.=.....0 �.nb Water Well Contractor's Certification:
This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to
Was pump installed n0 the best of my knowledge and belief.
p p Type HP Depth ft. Nameaoflald F. McConnell dba STEIIT S:AN l9'OS. DRILL
Was a drive shoe used? al Yes ❑No Plugs Size:location ft. (Person,firm or corporation) (Type or print)
Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑Yes /$i:No Address 32.,-: SE HO1 y AV.?.. 7:.i1'.vauki e, OR '7222
Type of Water? depth of strata IY�� 'v
Method of sealing strata off [Signed] !.• ,�� .-t4�
( r Well Co tractor) •
Was well gravel packed? O Yes ,'Xo Size of gravel: Contractor's License No. 1 Date 5-8 ,19.x8.3.
Gravel placed from ft.to ft.
NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRACTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SP•12658.690
The original and first copy of this report SALEM,OREGON 97310
are to be filed with the within 30 days from the date of well completion.
„_ _,_._Y._ _._.._ "___ •••• 1•/ a Y live I”'Wl'1114°' ,.J\-...\
STATE OF OREGON
APR 1 n
�yp�� State Permit No.
PLEASE TYPE or lVRC.�OURC,ES DEPT
(1) OWNER: SACAM. OROFOM
(10) LOCATION OF WELL:
Name John :Hedlund County Clackamas Driller'swellnumber
Address 240 S. W. Birdshill Loop SE / NW v.Section 6 T. 2 W R. 1 E. W.M.
City Portland, Oregon 972$9te Tax Lot# Lot Blk Subdivision
(2) TYPE OF WORK (check): Address at we location:
New Well)J Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon❑ ----
If abandonment,describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found 125 ft.
Static level 40 ft.below land surface.Date 4/4/83
Rotary Air XX Driven ❑ Domestic XX Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Artesian pressure lbs.per square inch.Date '
Rotary Mud ❑ Dug ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑
Ott ❑ Bored ❑ Thermal: Withdrawal ❑ Reinjection ❑
(12) WELT.LOG: 6"Diameter of well below casing I
(5) CASING INSTALLED: Steel ❑ Plastic XX Depth drilled 200 ft. Depth of completed well 175 ft.
Threaded ❑ Welded $}C Formation:Describe color,texture,grain size and structure of materials;and show
thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry
..„..6....-
..."Diam.from= t1 ft.to 50_ft. Gauge P.V.C:-2Q.0 for each change of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level
"Diam.from ft.to ft. Gauge and indicate principal water-bearing strata.
LINER INSTALLED: MATERIAL From To SWL
4 "Diam.from 5 ft.to 175 ft. Gauge PVC-200 Brown clay-occ.rock fragments 0 6
(6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? N Yes ❑No Gray-brown boulders & rock 6 9
Typeofperforatorused Drill Gray-brown basalt,fractured,
Size of perforations 3/8" in.6(' diameter in. hard 9 22
120 perforations from 115 ft.to 175 ft. Brown basalt, dirty, occ.soft 22 25
Black-brown basalt & lava,
perforations from ft.to ft. —
coarse grained 25 40
perforations from ft.to ft. Black basalt, odd. dirty brown
7)
( ) SCREENS: Well screen installed.
❑Yes
®No
streaks 40 80
Manufacturer's Name Red-brown & black basalt streaks80 95
Type Model No. Gray basalt, hard coarse
Diam. Slot Size............Set from ft.to ft. grained 95 155 w.b.
Diam. Slot Size Set from ft.to ft. Red clay & clays tone 155 170
(8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered Brown clay--sticky 170 200
below static level
s la Ypu ipftest made? ❑Yes XX No If yes,by whom?
;A r
;f : 13 gal./min.with 129 ft.drawdown after 2 hrs. —
n ,, „
Air test gal./min.with drill stem at ft. hrs.
Bailer test gal./min.with ft.drawdown after hrs.
�.e sian flow g.p.m.
'. nperature of water Depth artesian flow encountered ft.
Work started 4/1 /83 19 Completed 4/4/83 19
(9) CONSTRUCTION: Special standards: Yes❑ No X7 Date well drilling machine moved off of well 4/4/83 19
Well seal—Material used cement grout plus gel (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification (if applicable):
Well sealed from.land surface to 50 ft. This well was constructed under my direct supervision.Materials used
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal 10 in, to 25' , 8" o and information reported above are true to my best knowledge and belief.
Diameter of well bore below seal 6 in. 50 [Signed] Date ,19
Number of sacks of cement used in well seal 10
sacks Bonded Water Well Constructor Certification:
How was cement grout placed? Pumped through casing at 50' Bond Issued by: Great American Insurance
to ground level (number] Surety Company Name
This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
Was pump installed? no The HP Depth ft. Name A• M. JANNSEN WELT,..pj,I.LI,4J......CO., INC,
..
Was B drive shceused'? 0 Yes [ENO Plugs Size:location ft. (Person,firm orcorporation) � (Type or pr,nt(
Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑Yes X]No Address2\075 W Tualatin Valley Hwy. AlohB.,....QR_.,.
Type of Water? depth of strata ..
Method of sealing strata off
[Signed] ..... . ..'a'.1 at
7 `CJ�� ^ •\`A� ' >� Water Well Constructor
Was well gravel packed. ❑Yes XXNo Size of gravel: & H ) Date 4/.4/.83 19
Gravel placed from, ft.to ft.
NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONSTRUCTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, S •45292-690
The original and first copy of this report SALEM,OREGON 97310
are to be filed with the within 30 days from the date of well completion.
4 "4, e y.t "7, Rf"',7' .77 at =r ]7 ,jM'"'�1fr'Sr
� K :..t r n `` � tit+t r ..+-rt�.t � , t "4 Y ♦ 4!` ,�� S. V r K .h 7 2 t. rr,� � ''f r J t -5 x-s r,y.el,�
r J ;.k. 1 aiu , J..
:. . .. F z,k tY ti.t, s+.a l.r :.n: .�,., e Y•.X r„l;,l :} a N .i ...
) NOTICE TO WAT It Wra..1. l.l1LV 1.it4Ct.ivtt ;
ks
The original and first copy •,,i �;,� it ,>� '5-..,L
of this report are to be WATER WELL REPORT
filed with the -OF OREGON APR 3 I97 State Well No. 5/1 ( C Pr
STATE ENGINEER, SALEM. OREGON 97310 (Please type or print)
within 30 days from the date S7ATC ENGINETh to Permit No
of well completion. (Do not write above this line)GAL,G;`,j, `•�fG: ;::/'
(1) OWNER: WAIT (10) LOCATIO)1 OF WELL:
e..
Name V ,/..5r��-J?r-- County w� y Driller's well number .93/
Address 4g:S/ 1V.G 11 S Vy A Section 1 T. as R. `W W.M.
�'�1'PrJ,ve� —p-�' Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner
(2) TYPE OF WORK (check):
New Well pi Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑
If abandonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found 82,6---- ft.
�
Rotary ' Driven ❑ Domestic ' .Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level , n 0 ft. below land surface. Data' r.J
Cable ❑ Jetted ❑
Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date
CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded �,�7 (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing
�?_...-Diam. from te, ft. to ../Q.. ' ft. Gage i.,-+4' Depth drilled 7/ ft. Depth of completed well , al ft.
' Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage
Formation: Describe color, texture, gram size and structure of materials;
'Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,
with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in
c
�,PERFORATIONS: Perforated? ❑ Yes X No. position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata.
$'ype of perforator used MATERIAL From To SWL
Size of perforations in. by in. in i / aa►
perforations from ft. to ft. F.1-ei,t//1°
r�i-e.t,•V N C A/)-c.1 °2 p
perforations from ft. to ft. //0�1%2 .-.y4Ndc JOA/t'' a-1/r
perforations from ft. to ft. Ve ,o.y ra�Q,} l+ asa/7-4-c. s4 I I In
7 SCREENS: No
1/44,- a,) u` .�s - /?"- / Ye- //.?. _
( ) Well screen installed? ❑ Yes ' N tjog V A4yf rf-C,` % er-f-S 1/,j2, 1 7'
Manufacturer's Name /1744i- r
Type Model Na.
64"4-71.-942 S4/T7 C.Z17.Sd-i m_s Ir../ a 56
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft. 1yc,/ �V .,,y?yg//7— 1146 .a.j-
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft. `c'p�j/ /e;s,,wNOks.11 t 2 4. .v/,(w4Z, a s. (97e a,eg
(8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is /
• lowered below static level
Was a pump test made? lg Yes ❑No Iff yes, by whom? 6 7,,...,,,7,-,,--
Yield: 30 gal./min. with 174e ft. drawdown after 2_ hrs.
n II II
I/ u U n
Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs.
Artesian flow g,p.m. r^1 �y
!tperature of water J� Depth artesian flow encountered ft. Work started 19 Completed 3 - c• 19 -
(9) CONSTRUCTION: Date well drilling machine moved off of well �3— c-2. S 19
Well seal—Material used Ce'"7.4'-V <,I ro-) / Drilling Machine Operator's Certification:
Well sealed from land surface to / `
.e 4 ft. This well was constructed under my direct supervision.
Materials us and information r-sorted.above are true to my
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal ' in. best kno edg and belief..
Diameter of well bore below seal G^ in. [Signed fit,// >r �"•'ate -', —�5, 19 �—
(Drilling Mach ne Operator)
Number of sacks of cement used in well seal a./ sacks
Number of sacks of bentonite used in well seal sacks Drilling Machine Operator's License No.
Brand name of bentonite Water Well Contractor's Certification:
Number of pounds of bentonite per 100 gallons
of water lbs./100 gals. This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is
true tg best • iy kno ledge and�belief
Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes No Plugs Size:location ft. Name _1,...41:74"14017:S.� '- 1 /� `,���V
Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes �j] No _ P so fl. r corporation) (Type or pr ()n
Type of water? depth of strata Address . ...�J Pi''`;l�A. Pr'. em.,....L/ -0.
Method of sealing strata off `
[Signed Pc-a" .077.: 1..41-111-,
Was well gravel packed? ❑ Yes No Size of gravel: (Water Well Contractor) r1
Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Contractor's License No.'/.L"2'. Date --,9- 5 , 19.7
(USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) S1'45654-119
I'S
LiV
NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTR RJAN 7 ja8R,
The wigi.paloarvagrgcay ..,.., , .
VFATER WELL REPORT V
IlleciPwith the S i. A1 E E.-N G i N State Well No. 1
STATE ENGINEER, SALEM, OREGON'973.ip ;.:-NA ,...,r...„ ..„..,. mTE ink OF OREGON
within 10 days front the date - ---,v• Ler re„...l..z.t_JR■flease type or print)
of well completion, State Permit No.
-
(1) OWNER: (11) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water evel is
. lowered below static level
t.
Name I' • • Was a pump test made?pf Yes 0 No If yes,by whom?
- -
ZAddress 4. 1 p ro ei 0 rmswas pa re
., -• .... _ A Yield: /15/ gal./min. with 2.ft drawdown after Z hrs.
4r4CIWAIINc
1-_,,A.,21._ ..• yr so II
■■••■•■••■••■■• ,,
(2) LOCATI it! OF WELL:
• Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs.
County (1...)01 A i)„,. Driller's well number Artesian flow g.p.m. Date
4 4 Section T. R. W.M. Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis made?0 Yes ri,15.2
Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner
---'
/7 6 56 W 7;1,11/41 Ctr...-c../ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing
/ di ...... Depth drilled / __1"--- ft. Depth of completed well
Formation:Describe by color,character,size of material and structure,and
show thickness of aqutfiers and the kind and nature of the material in each
stratum penetrated,with at Least one entry for each change of formation.
MATERIAL FROM TO
(3) TYPE OF WORK (check): .• 0 C,
. .... _..
.=Na•'-'1 W el Deepening 0 Reconditioning 0 Abandon 0 r -
,rndonnent
describe material and procedure in Item 12.
,' ,-e-___ MEW .WIMPArgir:
.. :
(4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: / MI .icfi
Rotary 0 Driven 0 . ..../MMIret ...W. IINSI 1
Domestic Industrial 0 'Municipal 0
Cable sit Jetted 0 e>li 7/ e
C ry c 9 2■ __co.
Irrigation 0 Test Well 0 Other 0 Dug 0 Bored 0 1.' , 4, / 2,
(6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded 0 Welded .
ii.i..WirANSFAIWYMIIIIIIII' ' ' Ye/
•Are.far..- ■ _. ez __ .gifgrAMFAI • ....
‘ ”
Diam.from "r ft.to i/O p.t.
1 ft. Gage ......e.. . . . •.
.......... ...."Diam.from ft.to ft. Gage /e°
- . .,_S C4- ....- /
9., /,0
-- °.
....._........ "Diam.from ft.to ft. Gage a (3
11, ,
A 1 7 1 /1/47
(7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? 0 Yes "il No /C /
Type of perforator used
Size of perforations in. by in. ANIMPSINNW l •
7. . • / AiL1 /
perforations from ft. to ft. Adir P ;J:- " ..5-L"
perforations from ft. to ft. t4- e l , INN -/
perforations from ft. to ft. ) O.'
. Y.
'7401) perforations from ft. to ft.
perforations from ft. to ft.
....
(8) SCREENS: Well screen installed? 0 Yes 'Zif No
Manufacturer's Name
Model No. I
Slot size Set from ft. to ft.
Work started 6- )-----6./kr.19 . Completed
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft.
Date well drilling machine moved off of well t.--(6-4.6- 19
(9) CONSTRUCTION: - (13) PUMP:
. ;
( Well seal-Material used in seal C./..g.)./ Manufacturer' L>
Depth of seal C...12.2 ft. Was iepacker used? .....,e2.1..C) Type: H.P. / A
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal / 2... in,
Water Well Contractor's Certification:
Were any loose strata cemented off?0 Yes No Depth
Was a drive shoe used? 0 Yes (14,No This well was drilled u der my jurisdiction and this report is
Was well gravel packed? 0 Yes g No Size of gravel: true to the best of my .n. ledge and bel' f.
/ -
Gravel placed from ft.to ft. f ee"
NAME 0 ° ......
Did any strata contain unusuable water? 0 'Yes a No erson,X or curporat on) ' ype ppa,fl 9)
Type of water? depth of strata Lif-L
Method of sealing strata off
(10) WATER LEVELS:
Drilling Machine Operat r's Li
4 ..
-ISigned] /727 o • 40
Static level 41 9.
ft.below land surface Date z -7„,e--e• (Water Well Contractor)
Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date Contractor's License No.c_7y 7 Date 7--ca.F , 19..4.. —
(USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) .
...,..r,.,_.,......, .........,... w>.,.,+rx...:..i:r-:va.6.2-7.u..100* ,414,,a+»:::4 1.-Q tti M'.,:..i v.Yw'V:iL e-g 1
NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRACTOR
The ori,ai;i•al and first copy of this report
are to be filed with the WATER WELL REPORT
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. STATE OF OREGON State Well No. 114.1 1CC
SALEM, OREGON 97310
within 30 days from the date (Please type or print)
of well completion. (Do not write above this line) State Permit No.
(1) OWNER: ,,y' J (10) LOCATION OF WELL:
Name Ze//N(. 1 V.G'�'L , County 'w,�
��� S w �� � W41,sr.� Driller's well number
Address^ss �/ 'l'
!—f.or/i JSY 0 ke /1 LLB I���vY i'a Section Tr. � R. /V� W.M.
Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner
(2) TYPE OF WORK (check):
New Well ❑ Deepening X Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑
If abandonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found 2.741 .,,$CC/ ft.
Rotary 1,ir Driven ❑ Domestic Industrial /� p�J
'� e ❑ Jetted ❑ ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level ft. below land surface, Date w""3 f
❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑
Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date
(5) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded ❑ (12) WELL LOG: of "'
( Diameter of well below casing
"Diam. from ee 41✓� ft. Gage Depth drilled 430 ft. Depth of completed well err ft.
"Diam. from f, to ft, Gage
l Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure of materials;
,y. " Diam, from ft. to ft. Gage and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,
with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in
, 6 PERFORATIONS:T position o
.( ) A IONS: perforated? ❑ Yes tit No. p f Static Water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata.
Type of perforator used MATERIAL From To SWL
Size of perforations in, by in. 6.53/317/ R��. , 4./`7 027C Sect
perforations from ft, to ft. .. ./1••., , . '1:, rr�4 ' ,' 3 , r ,'
perforations from ft. to ft. _rI' JT Y "d N ao Sf1 " , .], •7/fi 4 �C.
perforations from ft. to ft. h‘_/141415" 0.9S4/7 38d llea
(7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes Qy No
Manufacturer's Name
Type Model No.
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft.
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft.
(8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is .D !, ° q.„
lowered below static level 1.t •,• yy ,..., 1 h ,,, fi Gl
...t7-:,: ;
a pump test made? %Yes ❑ No If yes, by whom?O/ir014-4.4 r
field: /0 gal./min. with 3jI ft.�`drawdown after rj�, hrs. ` 15i�Q
" ,, " „
WATER RESOURCFS DEPT —
II rt II m
13 t-ie sr test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs.
' sian flow g,p,m, �y
Temperature of wateg5 &Depth artesian flow encountered ft. Work started 7- .J 19 V'G'Completed $7 04 19 .74l�
(9) CONSTRUCTION: Date well drilling machine moved off of well '7" /z) 19 j`
Well seal—Material used —a.. Drilling Machine Operator's Certification:
Well sealed from land surface tor�,J (7 ./.�/l,� ft. This well was constructed under my direct supervision.
_��h Materials and infor at"porte above are true to my
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal best kn led and belie
Diameter of well bore below seal in. R /
Number of sacks of cement used in well seal [Signed it ... _ . e.._e.•..... .�NlHate ...! /�l, 19. 5✓
sacks
(Drilling Machi e Operator)
How was cement grout placed? Drilling Machine Operator's License No. \...3C1-2
',
Water Well Contractor's Certification:
This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is
true toT4o 'est o kno edge and belie
Was a drive shoe used? 0 Yes ❑No Plugs Size: location ft. Name r ,..: . - e Ph/�. .e .11X!Did any strata contain unusable water'? ❑ Yes No n,t orporation) or t)
Type of water? depth of strata Address .......,.yr k...l . hi........: ' 4V.-.14.1.4.
Method of sealing strata off 1//
Was well gravel packed? [Signed] . /I"'" .(�'._ .�� 'C
❑ Yes kg Size of gravel: // (Water Well ontractor)actor)
Gravel placed from ft, to ft. Contractor's License No 1j .. Date ... �['/ , 19. tO
, (USE ADDITIONAL snr,wrs ,�,..r,....,.:...._. �._._.
NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTR CTOR
The original and first copy �
of this report are to be ' E r WELL REPORT tf,filed with the ' 1i7 tu
`—
+.,� r 6t OF OREGON State Well No. f / --�,-
STATE ENGINEER, SALEM,OREG N9 10, I��a 2 r r :T.
within 30 days from the date �. " /„+ i ot• a type or print)
of well completion. •� « fDo not write above this line) State Permit No
(1) OWNER: (11) LOCATION OF WELL:
Name Mr. Audrey Bake CountfV'1 c1ca ag Driller's well number 57-69
Address 211250 S. W. 65th, Tualatin, Or. 97062 NW !. NW !. Section 6 T. 2S R. lE W,M. 1
(2) TYPE OF WORK (check): Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner I
New WellXJ Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon❑ —
1
If abandonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check):
(12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing 6"
Rotary ❑ Driven❑
Cable Q Jetted ❑ Domestic 1{1 Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑
Dug ❑ Bored Depth drilled 250 ft. Depth of completed well 250 ft.
0 Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑
Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure of materials:
CASING INSTALLED' Threaded ❑ Welded�(1 and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,
C:'
' LL with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change
6." Diam. from 1. ft. to 110 ft. Gage 0.250 in position of Static Water Level as drilling proceeds. Note drilling rates.
" Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage MATERIAL From To SWL
" Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage Orange Clay 0 1
PERFORATIONS: Perforated?❑Yes R1 No. Broken rock and clay. 1 31
u e of perforator used
Rock, med. hard, grey___'�',i i ) g y___ 31 103
1 Size of perforations in, by in. Rock, hard, grey 103 113
Rock, med. hard, grey 113 1211
perforations from ft. to ft' Rock, hard, grey —_. 12L1 136
perforations from
p ft. to ft. Rock, med. hard, brown 136 139
perforations from ft. to rt.
Rock, hard, gray. _ 139 167
perforations from ft. to ft.
Rock, mad. hard, brown _167 I 180
perforations from ft. to ft. Rock, hard, grey 180 250 118
(7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes !No
Manufacturer's Name — -
Type Model No. -------
Diam. Slot size Set from-'• - ft. to ft. --
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft. '•-
(8) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. n _
9
Static level 118 ft. below land surface Date 9-3-69
fan pressure lbs. per square inch Date
(9) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is
lowered below static level
Was a pump test made?❑ Yes IJ No If yes, by whom?
+tld: Work started Aug. 19 1969 Completed Sept. 15 1969
gal./min, with ft. drawdown after hrs.
" " " Date well drilling machine moved off of well Sept. 16 1969
" " - Drilling Machine Operator's Certification:
Mate-
Bailer test 1� gal./min. with 75 ft, drawdown after ] hrs. This well was constructed under my direct supervision. Mate-
rials used and information reported above are true to my best
Artesian flow g.p.m. Date knowledge d belie .
Temperature of water 51 OWas a chemical analysis made?.0 Yes l No [Signed] 11.sp�,f7 /.� teS.eptr...2.3, 16.9...
--` (Dri ii g Machine Operator)
(10) CONSTRUCTION: Drilling Machine Operator's License No. 39.8
Well seal—Material used Bentonite
Depth of seal 40 ft. Water Well Contractor's Certification:
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal 10 in, This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is
Were any loose strata cemented off? ❑Yes (No Depth true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Was a drive shoe used? /0 Yes ❑No NAME S Eiflixlrllaxl...PxO0,a
(Person,firm or corporation) (Tyne or print)
Did any strata contain unusable water? 0 Yes 10 No Addres 5112 S•E•McLoughlin,M.ilwaukie,Or. 97222
Type of water? depth of strata n
Method of sealing strata off [Signed] 6-. .e )/1.i.l.. k7 S.g,et
Was well gravel packed? ❑ Yes No Size of gravel: (Water Well Contractor) t�
Gravel placed from ft, to ft. Contractor's License No I Date Sept,. 23 196 9
.\V 811.1'. 1V ++fl a L'11 Y•∎-a-ai V1'yl 'M, 'y lira
The original and first copy, t1 g (VJI
are to be filed with the _^ "WATER WELL REPORT ^e /J
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTAEN'r, 2 19 i i STATE OF OREGON State Well No. .'R.:5 !,
SALEM, OREGON 97910 (Please type or print)
within 30 days film RESOURCES DEPT,
Q State Permit No.
of well completion.
SALEM, OREGON (Do not write above this line)
(1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL:
Name rtrs. Audrey Bake County Clackamas Driller's well number 57-69 (79)
Address 2/1250 S. W. 65th Ave., Tualatin, Ore. NW y NW %Section 6 T, 2S R. lE W.M.
97062 —
— Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner
(2) TYPE OF WORK (check): —'
New Well❑ Deepening s2 Reconditioning❑ Abandon❑ __y
If abandonment, describe material and procedure In Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found 342 ft.
Rotary 7Ej Driven 0
Cable Domestic $] Industrial 0 Municipal ❑ Static level 185 ft, below land surface. Date 20
❑' Jetted Q 5 3� �79
Dug 0 Bored 0 Irrigation 0 Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date
( 'ASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded 0 12 WELL LOG: 6
( ) Diameter of well below casing
" Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage
Depth drilled 360 ft. Depth of completed well 360 it.
"Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage 1
Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure of materials;
"Diam. from ft. to ft. Gage and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,
with at least one entry for each change of formation.Report each change in
(( TERFORATIONS: Perforated? ❑ Yes ) No. position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata.
Type of perforator used MATERIAL From To SWL
Size of perforations in. by in. Basalt hard grey 250 329
perforations from ft. to ft. Basalt grey and brown 329 342
perforations from ft. to ft. Basalt black and brown soft
perforations from ft. to ft. 20 gpm 342 351 185
(7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes No
� Basalt Grey Hard. 351 360
Manufacturer's Name
Type Model No. For the original drilling log efer to our well
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft. report 457-69, dated September 23, :969.
Diam. Slot size Set from ft. to ft.
(8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is
lowered below static level
Was a pump test made? ❑Yes [Jj No If yes, by whom?
Yield: gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs.
411" " " or
B ail 8:liI t 20 gal,/min. with 170 0 ft. drawdown after 1 hrs.
—
Artesian flow g.p.m.
erature of water Depth artesian flow encountered ft. Work started 3/19 19 79 Completed 3/20 1979
(9) CONSTRU CTION:
9 Date well drilling machine moved off of well 3/20 1979
Well seal—Material used Drilling Machine Operator's Certification:
Well sealed from land surface to it This well was constru4ted under my direct supervision.
Materials used and information reported above are true to my
Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal in. best knowprife and belief.
Diameter of well bore below seal in. [ g ] T\�,, ,
Si ned \.�Sa�.. S� Date 3�2b..., 19.7.9.
Number of sacks of cement used in well seal sacks t i Machine Op ator)
Daniel V. iVV°I...`A�1
How was cement grout placed? Drilling Machine Operator's License No. 718
Water Well Contractor's Certification:
This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is
true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Was a drive shoe used? ❑ Yes ®No Plugs Size: location ft.
Did any strata contain unusable water? 0 Yes No Name Steinman Bros. Dration) Co.
(Person,firm or corporation) (Type or print)
Type of water? depth of strata Address 3023 S E. Holly Ave.t Milw., Ore. 97222
Method of sealing strata off y'j / // !/� J
Was well gravel packed? ❑ Yes No Size of [Signed] .12-x- "`�� 4,. f.„---r� ?
g p (ii gravel: Ron ld F. McDonnell (Water Well contractor)
Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Contractor's License No. 626 Date March 29 1s79
(USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) SP•45e56-119
•
•
•
City of Tigard
Planning Commission
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Submitted by:
Reynold Kordatzky
Solder Shack
8900 SW Burnham - F-24
Tigard, Oregon 97223
July 12, 1983
•
•
OLPER @'FRIG
8900 S.W. Burnham Sp. F-24
Tigard, OR 97223
(503) 639-2100
my name is Reynold Kordatzky, owner of The Solder Shack located at 8900
SW Burnham, Bldg. F--24 Tigard, Oregon 97223. The Solder Shack is a small
family-owned business specializing in stuffing and hand soldering of printed
circuit boards.
On May 2, 1983 I rented Bldg. F-24 which was advertized in the newspaper as
light industrial warehouse and office space. The property manager, Mr. Don
Powell, indicated to my wife and I that our type of business would be
permitted in this building.
I went to Hillsboro City Hall and was told Tigard handled their own business
permits. I telephoned Tigard City Hall and was informed they did not require
a business permit but the building had to be inspected by someone from their
office prior to occupancy.
On May 5, 1983, Mr. Ed Walden, Engineer from the City Planning Department
inspected my building. I was informed by Mr. Walden (with Mr. Don Powell,
property manager present) I needed to make sure there were proper exit signs
posted and a lock on the rest room door. We would be allowed to have
approximately 6-8 employees. Mr. Walden expounded on how the city of Tigard
encourages small businesses, like myself, to operate here and this location
was ideal for small companies to get their start. Nothing was ever mentioned
to me about obtaining a business tax license or that this property was not
properly zoned.
Knowing I had followed proper procedures, I started to do some remodeling.
We put in an air-circulating system, drop ceiling, a wall partition, flores-
cent lights and did extensive painting, including carpeting the office and
window dressing. I also purchased new and used furniture and equipment for
the business.
I then contacted the State for my I.D. number, withholding tax payment forms,
Tri-Met excise tax forms, and my employment tax rate. I also received my
Worker's Compensation Insurance thru S.A.I.F. A business bank account was
established, business cards and business letterheads were printed, telephone
installed, and thirty (30) business form letters were sent out to prospec-
tive customers using this new address.
On June 22, 1983 I was informed by Mr. . Don Powell, property manager, that this
property was not zoned for my type of business and this zone change took
g place
March 1, 1983, two (2) months prior to my renting and having the building
inspected by Mr. Ed Walden.
,. ,
i,LibEfil
v
sHAc
8900 S.W. Burnham Sp. F-24
Tigard, OR 97223
(503);639-2100
Page 2
On June 23, 1983, I telephoned Mr. Walden's office to explain what had taken
place and was informed by having Mr. Walden inspect my building two (2) things
were accomplished 1) structure requirements met type of business operation
and 2) properly zoned for type of business. All I would have to do now was
to apply for a business tax license and pay the $50.00 fee. This was the m
first time a business tax license was ever mentioned to me. I applied for
my business tax license the same day and was informed I would be notified on
approval.
June.' 27, 1983 I received a phone call from The City Planning Department in-
forming me my application had been denied because the property was not zoned
for my type of business. I spoke with Liz Newton who stated she would permit
me to stay thru July 1983 pending the outcome of these hearings.
The Solder Shack operates a highly technical business, stuffing and hand
soldering of printed circuit boards from electronic companies. This type of
business is very clean and quiet.
I would like to bring to the attention of
this Board there is no difference
in my business operation than the Tigard Farm-Out division of Tektronics,
who share the same building complex with Tigard City Hall on SW Ash, less
1 than one (1) block from my address. The Solder Shack is not a manufacturing
company; merely a company providing service to the electronic industry.
I respectfully submit my request to be able to remain at 8900 SW Burnham
without facing the overwhelming cost of relocation, loss of business, and
interruption of production. Because The Solder Shack is a small family
, business, there is a great possibility of losing everything my wife and I
have invested.
Thank you.
V truly your ,
Reynold Kordatzky
RK:bhn
.......................7
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.8
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 12, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARD ROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. , TIGARD, OREGON
A. FINDING OF FACT
CASE: S 5-83 Bond Park NPO #5
REQUEST: For a 24 lot subdivision on 3.76 acres, consisting of 23 lots
and one existing house. Also, approval of a Sensitive Lands
Permit to allow for construction of a sewer line within the
100-year floodplain.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential
ZONING< DESIGNATION: A-12
RECOMMENDATION: Based on information submitted by the applicant,
Comprehensive Plan Policies and Staff's plan review and
field investigation, staff recommends approval of S
3-83.
APPLICANT: Waverly Construction Co. OWNER: Conrad & Ethelyn Sproul
11903 Broadacres N.E. 15880 S.W. 79th
Hubbard, Oregon 97032 Tigard, Oregon 97223
SITE LOCATION: 15880 S.W. 79th Ave. , (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12C lots
800 & 2000)
NPO COMMENT: NPO #5 has not responded to this application request.
PUBLIC NOTICE MAILED: 18 notices were mailed. Two written comments were
received. The concerns were, briefly, that duplex
units are not appropriate in the area and that if
the request were approved, some sort of buffering
should be installed.
VICINITY INFORMATION: The surrounding area is developed as large lot
single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan
Designation is medium and the zoning designation is
A-12.
SITE INFORMATION: There is an existing home on the site with a detached
garage. The site is wooded with large fir trees and
slopes to the north-northeast.
B. APPLICABLE LAND USE POLICIES AND STAFF ANALYSIS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND
SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE
INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS.
All owners of record within 250 feet of this site received notice
of the hearing in the mail. A public notice was printed in the
Tigard Times on June 30, 1983. In addition, NPO #5 was notified of
the application.
2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES
IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS.
All interested parties are given 10 days at a minimum to comment on
land use planning issues and are encouraged to do so. In addition,
the planning staff is available to answer specific concerns or
questions individuals may have concerning a land use application.
3.2.1 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT ANY LAND FORM ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENT IN
THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN WHICH WOULD RESULT IN ANY RISE IN ELEVATION
OF THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN.
3.2.2 THE CITY SHALL:
a. PROHIBIT LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLOODWAY,
EXCEPT ALTERATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED WHICH PRESERVE OR ENHANCE THE
FUNCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY; AND
b. PROHIBIT LAND FORM ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE FLOODPLAIN
OUTSIDE THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS:
1. LAND FORM ALTERATIONS SHALL BE ALLOWED WHICH PRESERVE OR
ENHANCE THE FUNCTION OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY.
3.2.3 WHERE LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT ARE ALLOWED WITHIN THE
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OUTSIDE THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY, THE CITY
SHALL REQUIRE:
a. THE STREAMFLOW CAPACITY OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FLOODWAY BE
MAINTAINED;
b. ENGINEERED DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THERE WILL BE
NO DETRIMENTAL UPSTREAM OR DOWNSTREAM CHANGES IN THE FLOODPLAIN
AREA, AND THAT THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SENSITIVE LAND
SECTION OF THE CODE HAVE BEEN MET (See FIS September 1971).
The City Engineer has reviewed the applicant's proposal and finds
that the installation of the sewer line will not raise the 100-year
floodplain elevation. In addition, the City Engineer finds that
the streamflow capacity of the zero-foot rise floodway will be
maintained.
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 2
6.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR DIVERSITY OF HOUSING
DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES AT VARIOUS PRICE AND RENT LEVELS.
The subdivision of this property will provide 22 additional duplex
units and one triplex.
7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
THAT:
a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE SERVICE
CAPACITY INCLUDING:
1. PUBLIC WATER;
2. PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY); AND
3. STORM DRAINAGE.
b. THE FACILITIES ARE:
1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; AND
2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS.
c. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
The applicant is proposing to install public facilities in
accordance with planning policies and City ordinances.
7.4.4 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONNECTED TO A
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE.
The applicant is proposing to connect to the Fanno Creek
interceptor sewer line.
7.6.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT:
a. THE DEVELOPMENT BE SERVED BY A WATER SYSTEM HAVING ADEQUATE
WATER PRESSURE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES;
b. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT REDUCE THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE AREA
BELOW A LEVEL ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES; AND
c. THE APPLICABLE FIRE DISTRICT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS.
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has been notified of
the project, but has not submitted any written comments.
8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
THAT:
a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE
ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL AUTHORITY;
b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD
IN WIDTH;
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 3
c. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS
AND SIDEWALKS TO THE CITY STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT;
d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING
STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S
IMPACTS;
e. TRANSIT STOPS, BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED WHEN
THE PROPOSED USE IS OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT RIDERSHIP;
f. PARKING SPACES BE SET ASIDE AND MARKED FOR CARS OPERATED BY
DISABLED PERSONS AND THAT THE SPACES BF LOCATED AS CLOSE AS
POSSIBLE TO THE ENTRANCE DESIGND FOR PISABLEL PERSONS; AND
g. LAND BE DEDICATED TO IMPLEMENT THE BICYCLF/PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN.
The applicant is proposing to improve S.W. 76th and S.W. 79th
Streets to approved City standards. S.W. Bond Street will be
constructed to City standards.
•
12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH:
a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
The density proposed in the development conforms to those set in
the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan policies, plan map and interim
zoning map.
12.5.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE LOCATION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN
A MANNER WHICH ACCORDS WITH:
a. THE APPLICABLE POLICIES IN THIS PLAN;
b. THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE AND STANDARDS OF
THE USE.
1. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
(a) THE USE SHALL BE ALLOWED PROVIDED:
(1) THE UNIQUE NATURAL FEATURES, IF ANY, CAN BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE FACILITIES OR
ARRANGEMENT OF LAND USES.
The applicant's proposal conforms to all applicable planning
policies and locational criteria.
C. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS
SUBDIVISION
17.16.100 Tentative Approval.
Within sixty days of the date of submission of the preliminary plat the
Planning Commission will review the plan reports of the agencies listed in
Section 17.16.090 and may give tentative approval of the preliminary plat
as submitted or may modify the plat or, if disapproved, shall express the
Planning Commission's disapproval and reasons therefor.
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 4
•
No tentative plan for a proposed subdivision and no tentative plan for a
major partition shall be approved unless:
1. Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of
subdivision maps or major partition already approved for adjoining
property as to width, general direction and in all other respects,
unless the City determines it to be in the public interest to modify
the street or road pattern.
2. Streets and roads held for private use are clearly indicated on the
tentative plan and all reservations or restrictions relating to such
private roads and streets are set forth thereon.
3. The tentative plan complies with the Comprehensive Plan and
applicable zoning regulations of the City then in effect.
4. No tentative plat of a subdivision or map of a major partition shall
be approved unless there will exist adequate quantity and quality of
water and an adequate sewage disposal system to support the proposed
use of the land described in the proposed plat.
SENSITIVE LANDS
18.57.010 Statement of Intent.
Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuitable for development because
of location within the one-hundred-year floodplain, within a natural
drainageway, or on steep slopes. Sensitive land areas are designated as
such in order to give recognition to the need to protect the public
health, safety and welfare of the community through the regulation and
control of lands within floodplains, drainageways, and steeply-sloping
land areas, and to thereby mitigate potential financial burdens arising
from flood damage loss and to preserve natural drainageways from
encroaching uses which threaten to affect adversely the property rights of
the citizenry of the community, public safety, and the public health by
natural conditions arising from upstream or downstream flood levels. City
actions under this chapter will recognize the rights of riparian owners to
be free to act on the part of the City, its commissions, representatives
and agents, and landowners and occupiers.
The floodplain district has for its purpose the preservation of natural
water storage areas within the floodplain district by discouraging or
prohibiting incompatible uses. (Ord. 79-73 Section l (part), 1979: Ord.
79-46 Section 1 (part), 1979: Ord. 74-50A Section 1 (part), 1974) .
18.57.020 Definitions.
In this chapter the following words and phrases shall be construed to have
the specific meanings assigned to them as follows:
(6) "Floodplain" means the relatively flat area or lowlands adjoining the
channel of a river, stream, watercourse or other body of water which
has been or may be covered by floodwater within the area of
applicability defined by the floodplain district.
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 5
I
(7) "Floodplain district" means those areas within the city of Tigard
inundated by the one-hundred-year regulatory flood.
18.57.040 Uses and Activities Allowed with a Special Use Permit.
The following uses and activities are allowed only by special use permit
granted by he Planning Commission and based on the standards set forth in
Section 18.57.060:
(2) Within the floodplain/greenways only:
(A) Any temporary structure which by its nature cannot be readily
removed from the floodplain area during periods of flooding, and
which would impede or interfere with the flow of the floodwaters
within the district;
(B) Any changes in the topography or terrain which would change the
flow of waters during flooding periods, or which would increase
the flood hazard or alter the director or velocity of the
floodwater flow. (Ord. 79-73 Section 1 (part), 1979: Ord.
79-46 Section 1 (part), 1979: Ord. 74-50A Section 1 (part) ,
1974).
18.57.060 Special Use Permits.
In accordance with the procedures and requirements set forth in Chapter
18.84 of this Code, an application for a special use permit filed as by
said chapter stated may be approved or denied by the Hearings Officer
following a pubic hearing.
All applications for special use permits shall be supported by the
following information to enable the Planning Commission to determine
whether the proposed use is located in the floodplain or drainageways
district and if so, whether the proposal, if approved, will conform to the
purposes and guidelines as set forth in this chapter.
(1) Floodplain:
(A) Plans drawn to scale, submitted in triplicate as prepared by a
registered professional engineer with experience in hydraulic
and geohydrologic engineering and processes, showing the nature,
location, of existing and proposed structures located upon the
site, existing and proposed areas to be filled or otherwise
modified, and the relationship of these to the location of the
stream channel, and proposed methods for controlling erosion.
(B) Any documentation, photographs, water marks, and similar
evidence offered in support of the claim that the site or area
in question lies above high water as defined by the regulatory
flood.
STAFF REPORT-5 5-83-Page 6
•
It is the opinion of the City Engineer that the applicant's proposal to
construct a sewer line across Fanno Creek and through the 100-year
floodplain will not change the flow of water during flooding periods or
increase the flood hazard or alter the direction or velocity of the
floodwater flow. The applicant has submitted sufficient information to
reach a decision on this request.
18.57.070 Standards.
(a) Application for a special use permit in floodplain areas shall be
granted or denied in accordance with the following standards:
(1) No structure, fill, excavation, storage or other use shall be
permitted which alone or in combination with existing or
proposed uses would reduce the capacity of the floodplain area
or raise either the flood surface elevation or flow rates, or
adversely affect flow direction on upstream or downstream
properties, or create a present or foreseeable hazard to public
health, safety and general welfare.
(2) The applicant must obtain the permit required by the state of
Oregon under ORS Chapter 541 for removal or filling of
waterways, or demonstrate that the provisions of this statute do
not apply.
The applicant's narrative (attached) addresses standards required for
action on a Sensitive Lands Permit to allow fill and excavation within the
100-year floodplain and the zero-foot floodway. The City Engineer has
reviewed the applicant's narrative and finds that the proposal will not
adversely impact runoff, ground stability, water quality, groundwater
level, flow rates, or flooding. The City Engineer, however, does have
concerns regarding the applicant's proposal for erosion control. Staff
has recommended conditions to be attached to the approval of the request
which would address those concerns.
D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
SUBDIVISION
After reviewing the proposed plat and conducting a field investigation,
staff recommends approval of S 5-83. Staff finds that the proposed
development conforms to applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, Tigard
Municipal Code provisions, Interim Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Map
designations.
SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT
After review of the technical data submitted by the applicant, it is the
opinion of the City Engineer and planning staff that the proposal will not
adversely impact runoff, ground stability, water quality, groundwater
levels, flow rates, or flooding. Further, it is staff's opinion that the •
applicant's proposal does not violate the intent of the Sensitive Land
Ordinance.
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 7
Staff further recommends that the following conditions be attached to
approval of S 5-83.
1. The applicant shall apply for and obtain, Site Design Review approval
prior to issuance of any Building Permits.
2. Plans for public facilities to be installed in public rights-of-way
shall be reviewed and approved by the appropriate utility district.
All permits required for installation of public facilities in the
public right-of-way shall be obtained prior to construction. All
public streets shall be constructed to approved city standards.
Public sewer lines shall be extended to the project boundaries in all
directions.
3. All public improvements shall be bonded for 100% of the cost thereof
or constructed prior to issuance of any Building Permits.
4. The final subdivision plat shall be recorded with Washington County
prior to the issuance of any Building Permits.
5. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved plans without
written approval from the appropriate City department.
6. No Build~-?g Permits shall be issued until 14 days after Planning
Commission approval.
7. Access to all flag lots shall be ten feet wide for each lot. In
addition, a hard surface common driveway shall be installed for
access to the two lots. An access and maintenance agreement shall be
recorded with the deeds for lots sharing common driveways.
8. Upon completion of construction of the sewer line rip rap and
nettings shall be used on trench repair to restore and stabilize the
channel and prevent erosion. Specific plans for the trench repair
shall be approved by the City's Engineering Division.
P'P. ' D BY; Elizabeth . Newton APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan
Associate i'lanner Director of Planning
and Development
pm(0103P)
STAFF REPORT-S 5-83-Page 8
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 12, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARD ROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. , TIGARD, OREGON
A. FINDING OF FACT
CASE: S Sunnyside Estates 6 83 unnys e NPO #6
REQUEST: For approval of a 22 lot subdivision on 3.46 acres with a
minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density
ZONING DESIGNATION: R-5PD
RECOMMENDATION: Based on information supplied by the applicant,
Comprehensive Plan policies and staff's field
investigation, staff recommends approval of S 6-83.
APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Company OWNER: Same
9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , Suite 300
Portland, Oregon 97219
SITE LOCATION: 15280 S.W. 100th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11CA, Tax Lots
5600 thru 7100.
NPO COMMENT: NPO #6 has reviewed this application request and finds the
plan acceptable.
BACKGROUND/PREVIOUS ACTION:
On June 25, 1979, the Tigard City Council approved a zone change from
Washington County RU 4 to City of Tigard R-7 with conditions (ZC 12-79).
On February 20, 1980, the Planning Director approved a 15 lot subdivision
at the R-7 density with conditions.
On September 7, 1982, the Planning Commission denied a request for a zone
change from R-' to L-5 and approval of a 25 lot subdivision. On December
6, 1982, the City :,ouncil upheld the Planning Commission's decision for
denial. On February 27, 1983, the City Council denied a request by the
Robert Randall Co. for reconsideration of the matter. On March 28, 1983,
the Robert Randall Co. filed an intent to appeal with LUBA. On March 28,
1983 the Robert Randall Company also submitted an application (S 4-83) for
subdivision approval. On March 16, 1983, the City Council adopted the
interim zoning map which designates this property R-5PD. On April 11,
1983, the City Council voted to remand this matter to the Planning
Commission. On May 3, 1983, the Planning Commission modified the
applicant's proposal to allow 21 lots. On May 19, 1983, the State Land
Use Board of Appeals remanded the matter to the City based on subsequent
actions by the City in adopting the Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning
Designations.
AREA CHARACTERISTICS:
The surrounding area has been developed primarily as single family
residential. The Church of Latter Day Saints lies directly to the south.
The lots to the west and north are developed to the R-10 density. The
property to the east is vacant.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
There is an existing house and garage on the site which will remain as a
part of the new subdivision. The site slopes to the south and is grass
covered. There are few trees on the northern portion of the site.
APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND
SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE
INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS.
Notices will be sent to all property owners within 250 feet of this
application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times on June
30, 1983. In addition, NPO #6 has reviewed the application.
2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES
IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS.
All interested parties are given, at a minimum, 10 days to respond
in writing to the application and request under consideration and
are encouraged to do so. The planning staff is available to
address any specific questions concerning the application or the
application process.
6.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR DIVERSITY OF HOUSING
DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES AT VARIOUS PRICE AND RENT LEVELS.
The subdivision of this property will provide 21 additional single
family building lots in Tigard available for ownership by
individuals.
7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
THAT:
a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE SERVICE
CAPACITY INCLUDING:
1. PUBLIC WATER;
2. PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY); AND
3. STORM DRAINAGE.
STAFF REPORT-S 6-83-Page 2
b. THE FACILITIES ARE:
1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; AND
2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS.
c. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
The applicant is proposing to install public facilities in
accordance with planning policies and City ordinances.
7.4.4 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONNECTED TO A
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE.
The applicant proposed to connect to an 8" public sewer line in
S.W. Highland Drive.
7.6.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT:
a. THE DEVELOPMENT BE SERVED BY A WATER SYSTEM HAVING ADEQUATE
WATER PRESSURE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES;
b. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT REDUCE THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE AREAS
BELOW A LEVEL ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES; AND
c. THE APPLICABLE FIRE DISTRICT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS.
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has reviewed the
project and approved it as acceptable for fire protection and
access purposes.
8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
THAT:
a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE
ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL AUTHORITY;
b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD
IN WIDTH;
c. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS
AND SIDEWALKS TO CITY STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT;
d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING
STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S
IMPACTS;
• e. TRANSIT STOPS, BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED WHEN
THE PROPOSED USE IS OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT RIDERSHIP;
STAFF REPORT-S 6-83-Page 3
f. PARKING SPACES BE SET ASIDE AND MARKED FOR CARS OPERATED BY
DISABLED PERSONS AND THAT THE SPACES BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS
POSSIBLE TO THE ENTRANCE DESIGNED FOR DISABLED PERSONS; AND
g. LAND BE DEDICATED TO IMPLEMENT THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN.
The streets serving the proposed development, S.W. Kable Street and
S.W. 100th Avenue have been improved to City standards. The
private access drives to lots 5 and 8, 10 and 11, 14 and 15, and
20, 21 and 2.2 will be maintained through an easement agreement.
12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH:
a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
The density proposed in the development conforms to those set in
the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan policies, on the plan map and
interim zoning.
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS:
17.06.065 Criteria of Approval. No preliminary plat for a proposed
subdivision and no map or major partition shall be approved unless the
Planning Director finds:
(1) Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of
subdivision or maps of major partitions already approved for
adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other
respects, unless the City determines it to be in the public interest
to modify the street or road pattern;
(2) Streets and roads held for private use are clearly indicated on the
tentative plan and all reservations or restrictions relating to such
private roads and streets are set forth thereon;
(3) The preliminary plat complies with the comprehensive plan, the
applicable zoning regulations, and the regulations within this title;
(4) There will exist adequate quantity and quality of water and an
adequate sewage disposal system to support the proposed use of the
land described in the proposed plat. (Ord. 79-96 Exhibit A(part),
1979).
18.20.030 Lot R-5 Zone. In an R-5 zone the lot size shall be as follows:
1. The minimum lot area shall be five thousand five hundred square feet,
excepting for duplex use.
•
STAFF REPORT-S 6-83-Page 4
II
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
After reviewing the proposed plat and conducting a field investigation,
staff recommends approval of S 6-83. Staff finds that the proposed
development conforms to applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, Tigard
Municipal Code provisions and is compatible with the surrounding land uses.
Staff further recommends that the following conditions be attached to
approval of S 6-83.
1. Plans for public facilities to be installed in public rights-of-way
shall be reviewed and approved by the appropriate utility district.
All permits required for installation of public facilities in the
public right-of-way shall be obtained prior to construction. All
public streets shall be constructed to approved City standards.
Public sewer lines shall be extended to the project boundaries in all
directions.
2. All public improvements shall be bonded for 100% of the cost thereof
or constructed prior to issuance of any Building Permits.
3. The final subdivision plat shall be recorded with Washington County
prior to the issuance of any Building Permits.
4. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved plans without
written approval from the appropriate City department.
5. No Building Permits shall be issued until 14 days after Planning
Commission approval.
6. Access to all flag lots shall be ten feet wide for each lot. In
addition, a hard surface common driveway shall be installed for
access to the two lots. An access and maintenance agreement shall be
recorded with the deeds for lots sharing common driveways.
7. The southern terminus of S.W. 100th shall be completed with a
turn-around of a design approved by the City's Engineering Division.
8. A street plug shall be installed at the western terminus of S.W.
Kable.
4.1 All!..„...,tild, 0 'hilf ' ------P'E'' ' D BY: E izabeth A. N_ ton . AP OVED BY: William A. Monahan
Associate Plan"-r Director of Planning
and Development
STAFF REPORT-S 6-83-Page 5
(0103P)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
SUPPLEMENTAL-PART II
PROPOSED AND EXISTING RECREATION OR OPEN SPACE
The private yards of the individual lots will meet the open space needs
created by the development. Landscaping requirements including two
deciduous street trees per lot will be incorporated into the Conditions,
Covenants, and Restrictions of the Planned Development to enhance present
and
future values of the area
In addition, p
tion, the Summerfield Golf Cour
• Course
and field next to the Church will supplement this open space.
The area has sufficient recreational facilities according to the Tigard
Parks plan. Cook Park is approximately one mile away. Another park
in the vicinity is at Pinebrook and Hall. The addition of twenty two
lots will not have a significant impact on these parks. The private
yards will also serve as recreation area for these homes.
The topographical features of the site have been incorporated into the
design of Sunnyside Estates in order to maximize solar potential as well
as to inhance the lots individually.
SENSITIVE LAND FORMS
There are no sensitive land forms within the development.
TRAFFIC CIRCU LAPION, IMPACTS
There will be an extension of Kable from S.W. 100th to the east property
line, plus two extended driveways off of Kable and two extended driveways
off of S.W.: 100th Avenue. A temporary turnaround within the existing
right of way is planned on S.W. 100th Avenue next to the private
drive for lots 21 and 22. Lot 20 will access from S.W. 100th Avenue.
The proposed circulation pattern will provide safe access to each of the
lots and includes Fire District recommendations.
The extension of Kable will potentially allow the developers of the
vacant property (east of the subject site) to continue Kable through
to 98th upon development of that area.
Public transportation facilities are available to serve the proposed
development. There is a Tri-Met stop on 98th Avenue and Sattler (Route
#43), one block east of Sunnyside Estates.
i
•
2
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, SUPPLEMENTAL, PART II
PROPOSED/UNDERLYING DENSITIES
The underlying density for the site is R5 which would allow 27 lots (see
density sheet) . The proposed density is 22, or 6.4 lots per acre.
Lot sizes range from a minimum of 5,000 square feet and are approximately
7,000 square feet on average.
OWNERSHIP
Individual lots will be privately owned. We do not anticipate a conversion
of ownership at a later date.
NARRATIVE STATEMENT
The proposed development is in substantial conformance with the Compre-
hensive Plan designation as all homes are single family detached dwellings.
In addition, Sunnyside will lend to the diversification of housing densities
in accordance with Comprehensive Plan Policies (6. 1) ; and, the smaller
sized lots will reduce overall costs, making this housing more affordable (6.2).
Studies have shown that 500 of the total estimated housing demand is for
homes produced on 7,500-5,000 square foot lots. Because there is
growing demand for owner occupied housing and for smaller, more affordable,
homes, this is an important consideration.
There are no exceptions from the standards of the underlying district.
Due to the transitional or sensitive nature of the area, Sunnyside
Estates will be a Planned Development. The Planned Development overlay
allows an averaging of lot sizes which harmonizes the development with
the surrounding area, as the proposed development lies between an area
of larger lots (to the north and northwest) and the smaller Summerfield
lots (southwest). The vacant property to the east of Sunnyside Estates
is developable at the same density as the proposed P--D, which would
indicate further compatibility.
This proposed plat is a variation of the plat that had been approved by
the Planning Commission on May 3rd. In response to the concern about
lot sizes along Sattler,the lots in the northern portion of the subdiv-
ision have been enlarged. Sizes in this section now range from 6,800
square feet to 7,405 square feet. Lot boundaries to the south of Kable,
specifically lots 20, 21, and 22 have also been changed. Lot sizes
are now more similar to the existing Summerfield lots and range from
5,104 to 6,480 square feet. The proposed boundary change in the southern
portion of the subdivision does not substantially impact the currently
approved plan. The additional lot does not effect the current
drainage system and actually creates more desireable building envelopes
for the lower lots. The addition of lot 22 will not present any changes
in the safety factor for the private drive that will service both lots
21 and 22.
Sunnyside Estates will be in compliance with TMC 18.56.080 as it will
uphold existing peripheral yard requirements of the underlying zone.
3
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, SUPPLEMENTAL, PART II (cont.)
The approval of the development will have a beneficial effect on the
area as it will result in the construction of storm swers, solving
chronic drainage problems in the area as well as extending sewer
lines needed by some of the area's residents. Also, the Planned
Development does not provide for the maximum density allowed under
the underlying zone.
There are no deviations or variances from the standards, specifications,
or requirements relating to this proposal.
As staff recommendations have been incorporated into the currently
approved plan, we respectfully request that the amended plat be approved.
. . ,
., .
II
_ ........._,
r 11:ni,,-1 "" 1 !;-'7)7 , I %,.•.,
,,,.=---
I 4 •,4• -0•- . — „ _ i'........;;;----- _,----,------- ---........ --_______ _- ..
.f______,___- Li. .__,:,.--,"4 7 1 ‘..-•::: ''1:1\
..-...
IN 1 2 1 r' I I
I 6-6,v'' I .1 / L
,
'27f .--• L---/,..,.;:..___J_ ..4' 1-1,1..,' . _. •
76)/
-:.:.',.... lIf■ 1 .
3 . f,., L _.__I t
o
I
, I -Ic ro4 '\______ria ! R
'?3-3
-...,..,
,....6-.,c)
\!.. I I gl 41 , -
7\(-,,\I'll .74505+- ii -. 4 09'.,7-,EN' ',E
E X oil' ...;e--.. ; t■'11 4
1,1F.
.... I .7
• ' ill i 1 I-----, I---J 1, r-
,
tq . ,
.... ' — ----e6--I 10,' IX.4 -r-
/0 ; : 1/ c.10
4.
4.-c,.. 1
.
• , 0,1-701 cir) i; el..- 2- 1
I Y A'.....,..`..,-,
LP \ .
,, • -
. hcs.,..F.
I .
1. \ r 1 i .1 - -
.1 1 kl(7,1 r,- 7 .
9
f1c
i 0
44 •
i
, • -.;,p,z,
,
; I ,
--,-------
„
,.„1.
_ \A.i.
.-L-,
' ,.1 LL.,,4;m1,.....4,,,E,----I-- ,..■"Nt.:"..--I ,
--- .:-.:--. --- — ___:"------=---.'"7: r-f
1
-----); q
_______
"v is_21,_
Asea/7 L3arricacla
• I I I r 'cl 675
• -1 I I
1,
I •••
*.c.., I :II 1 /9 i 1 /3 'IQ, /7 I 1 ,..L.,,i i lo
■ ,,,s1' Iv . ,,.. . ,. C I_, I /6 ; ip
H5R>4
' ■ .. , ,, ■ ,,- I 1 14 1 I I ! 6,,SiOt T I I II
i-,•„ .., ,,,,.,.., 4' • I L j L. -.I L
,r_. , - 1 I 0
' IIIL•
I I % " ,--.'
I, _
1 1- 1 I tda,:af,";., -
, I ...4:%, 1 I I 1 e.c.,..cHLw;
I '
`sill' 4. 20 ei ;i •
ti 2e
A. I
■1 I ci/c.,4* ,,i.rit..041 ' --,-.-p Ji /5
6,We.° 1,.. I I
I I 4.
I /4
.'z ''.z..;1 L--__I I 1 1 !
.A---1-)1 I , 1.0504 1 I
I ' I I I
__,_ ____ E______ ...-.-----‘...-..'7.---a,. 1 :7,44;(.._.;:i.,..' - : L__ I
I .,--.
,, ,..., Jr. ---—,.....,. .....,..... ..... _.,..,
..--„, 4 4 .
7:i t3
b‘' '''''.?' - .." ''''. v--; - '......"1".. ".""'
- -
.1 • ."'
I ..... ,
.:.,.,1,
T r Lir:" ;1 •'. .
I „I
.....
1 .,.
I__
1 .../1•-•-•.',..*_... .
- ,......--.' :_ ---1 I. •
.•--a -. ', r....vt.,..
1 _ ,./..I;,'....I
r-,4.7 = I \ �`
I G :�_ �- �1-`� ,- so- .. traN
—- a 1\\ �J�' -T'- I II I --,E `b
— •-r'-'1"- \, C , .� \ ,„ (tom C ` q4 '
�0 ...aaa I �+11 1.•PLA\I \11N6 DATA
OWNEi TllE fzOPE1�7 RANz7-ALL CDMP- Y "0::f�
Pev L.OPz, Q�!c ' -W i A RI E. 2 /L 5.J/r€ _3Q ' ~
p {�O, TL<YV 7 C '. 97219 5 `et
fZ2s i•EigC I
PL4NN&4?/ v/AK�.R .�J��G/.dTc. /A/G.
r/G/Nf_.E1 //OF3O �✓'/A'-/—E, ,&kV ,/OP
` 's a✓.6 7o/Y 1, 97, ,,r7
LOGAi/o/✓ :,71/7.,,,i F =>t:/ SA 772- 7-AN2
qop I .s4s7".9r `•>w /90--;/A1.E'
;aX LD775 • 7a0 •i.,hrl 7/OG, 7-Z S i
R/W, S6.G./'GA 3.46 AL, s'
,\'/,:,.-72/,/ L/SE ✓AG-NT AND 4...(•//145 Fin,/c.y,/'FS.
// ZONE' A`5 (F4 -/NED I75VEGoi-'',4 y.)
PRaY ,EP L1.5. . SM./44E ✓-i/t..,r ✓F..p:;//S/o k/
., Zv,✓E A-
W4-2-eX, T/GAKP /A7E/ 27/S12/C7
.Gw.E.'' G/TY of 7-/G>i4li,,
Lii'
� J/PE.4 7 ., ,' ''
Q Toycr4,�?ATRJY 1�.5.4.�, 27A72JM 4l' 'oF Tit+.4, 0 II,,•
.. K c� i v
z } C
r TrLFPNONE �'T >Pak W II NM
Q GA Lo /V..1-.Y. /1472/4,AL DNS =i 1g xr
(t) (" L
v`1 /ndicafes Pri✓ate Or 4/ewys W
miLi sums
This Oeve%Dine,it /s A A-P/ot Of q
Lots /Th a/5 Of GULF S/06 W 0
ESTATES.' V,
-----7 c vim < tl,
47dicates Bv/biii79 Erne%e
. MaXi0u8 ea/Xi/i79 ea/era9e-357 h qi!
4411 -
q
-" ,\V�:. LO(AL STK�E; SET'c 1 G��, �� i ',_ ,:,,,,
r � 1 11
I
-_L (y
G '•`/4'-C'.' JOB NO. 54'LZO
i 6" 2,-0 i� -- /
DESIGNED J\ti/
�[7 , /rJ DRAWN --J V.I
— - —� COMP,
– " .
f4cvl i/f Jaen _ _ "1 CHECKED
–_ ..--
DATE/!IfIKC,4/ „/c783I
11 ' i` - SHIFT NO.
It
1 44I,r { ■ -',.r.`�� ''” -.tm isC".k,11-5-/•-, , Vi _•'r/-, ', I. t of ,,,ill ITS
L
i Ex14T RES. i RF, Kc<.
t IFO�} 1517 I (o3i2 ,ciGr•.
i 6.54, bating !d".✓eler•J - {Zp',.- - _
Rte, i ,,T 1mV.. _ x s. SATY L S S l-
(.:-_-__. _
. . ....... _ .._ .
, .... . Z / en,
1.i \/1,--N A i •
R±S�-)eNC�
;k.' 3 "). .__
/P's.a o
Rey. a R t - g,
� .e • 6,00 s
9 Y
vgc a,z? SGbE /4(.�s.€X 4•s.,-------s:F 4 S
W
III
- a fiv87 arty -`="1
`I J!'r•.c_• -....;is.J /0 //
6 3!S _ _ -- o --
3
VAGd.N-4
f
,Q . EX,S-riJa •
_ _
i'i , �rr.���i - a
IG} 4t n'''rr, ` 4-Pirate \
Res, �---i �'�` ".i oiire _ZZo
k
?' I ._ '7 9 f� ie
w ' - '
ErisGe�q/�Slo-� r in 1
.ilL _ sfa//Bersicero
• — mlmm ■11 "1"" .
I
i /9 /8 _ - /7 /6 1
" - ,r r�•, I /2Bp i /7''dte. 0
i is '<'� V�. v' C `'i 0.-/re 0
/OSO.J
I i II 'ST
I 20 2/ .e
.
/5 /4 L_________
Rf6- ' SS I /,5B.?
*iiipn%siy I Pr/rafe Oar )Tu rrr.4rvanc' I
-
I --7; �'C i I
W.
i e/SD i\/ 9°- J 4_ •v '�Oa.i3'
�
KW,
/,3e,//ttarr/caole.
J I le—ro •.
-'
•
F`� P GWL1 c of T T i>_� 2
is c
r�1 it I
co.
r .'' , 'r "fi ,..L. y ^-.! '`.'
1 .53,0111111121111. J f 1
WI x'11_ 'null = s
AI m/ 'LAN\ING DATA ,.3
9 i
OWNeK/ THE KOoaRT ,?Ais/P ALL GOMIANY 1 s
l vEELOPL 9°5 r2 SW/54R.PER BZ/L :".4h C
Ktsrp�eNC� erL6lvo. cvr'. 972/9
En/G///die //o 0 SW A[.LLV BZ)/C */oa
£ 4 'Y'o,E' 070,2 3 .�
40C.AT/cV so/s7,4,/ ar SKY SATTL.,/C ST AND 144'
4 oe, F44S7"Di' SW/0717.1A VE,
TAX 6075 57002 7:41R21 7/00,TZ.S,
R/W, SC- //GA 3.470 4F
EX/4.1"A/4 !/SE ✓CANT ANL7 .5i/114LE 1M/4.Y K .
zoNe ,'-S(RLANNEP PPVEP 1P r 9✓ 41.4)-)
P1?at-'4;SE1 LJ54, 5/h141.E AA/4/4.V-5.L/31:;///S/0A/
a ?a.VE ,e-S ..
WA7eX T/GAKP WATER P/aTR/GT
ASP/E.A. GMT) of T/e4 ra/Tp
57vxM z:d?4/N a „
SrRG,ETS 0 ,, ♦`
70,V4RAS',✓Y [/.5.4,5 77,4472/4 z 0
1 T -PNQN6 G'TE ua W o
6'A4, N Y5/. A4472AR,4 L AS 2 0 c.
cr EL417A'/ •TY PGi R 44.4 W Cl) o
'v 2 )
Z c
J Ul
Notes: \ Vj ' d�r.+ p
/9-oposFe/'Ut/kIxfs 8�
v V hater Cis
o
' W ® l
• storm Ora/47 V IA
,— _,.azi ' sewer k "V Q
Q
W
LAKE,4l PE.
I-r v� LOCA STKEET SE T1OtJ m_.)oi ig.A4
_ (--- _ 01 4 17' 11' 13'
r 1 ,s',1
,'r3"' cas�a G"AG'
} 2„ /�,i ,"RR JOB NO. 3A22-0
C6" 2'=0., R,E3
DESIGNED J
*0I VA,,/ DRAWN \AI
,' 20' 2o' COMP.
A6, sou te T7i CHECKED
_ DATE /i9K6.1/2:?/983
6.4.47 Berm 1 SHEET NO.
2'A.C• I tATGF1 k'1bKaT,43N0MErrT
e"34fo ,baBase /".445 G AG
6"2=0 Rboa'use Z"GG4 '8',AG '3
Z.".?,41"-o ,e4
PR/VATS OR/l/E 0474/L e3" z.o Ra
N5 1-4ALF STRE:c1 IMF'RD'1 4 4T 5W,SATTL . OF SHEETS
-- __
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.4
JULY 12, 1983 7:30 P.M.
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARD ROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. , TIGARD, OREGON
A. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. General Information
CASE: CPA 10-83 Krueger Comprehensive Plan Amendment
ZC 2-83 Krueger Zone Change
REQUEST: The City of Tigard is requesting Comprehensive Plan amendment
from Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to the
City of Tigard designation Medium-High Density residential
(13-20 units per acre) on approximately 90 acres, the requested
underlying zoning district is A-20 (Multiple Family
Residential) ; from Washington County designation 0-9 units per
acre to City of Tigard designation Medium Density residential
(6-12 units per acre) on approximately 38 acres, the requested
underlying zoning district is A-12 (Multiple Family
Residential); and from Washington County designation
Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard designation
Commercial-Neighborhood on approximately 4 acres, the requested
underlying zoning district is C-N (Neighborhood Commercial).
(Attachment "A")
RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's analysis of this request in relation to
the applicable policies and staff's coordination with
Washington County's planning staff, staff recommends that
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the City Council as
requested and approve the requested zone changes to be
effective when the City Council approves the
Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
OWNER: Russell Krueger, et al
14655 N.W. Hunter's Drive
Beaverton, OR 97006
Mr. Krueger is the owner of 105 of the approximate 132 acres in the
area. The list of property owners is attached. (Attachment "B")
LOCATION: The subject properties are located south of S.W. Scholls Ferry
Road, west of S.W. 135th Avenue and north of the properties that
front on S.W. Fern Street and S.W. 136 Const. Assessor Map
1S1-33C Tax lots 100-108, 300 (part of), 900 and 1000; Assessor
Map 2S1-4B Tax lots 100 and 101. (Attachment "C")
LAND AREA: 131.95 acres
NPO COMMENT: No NPO comments have been received at the writing of this
report. This area will be added into the NPO #7 area.
PUBLIC NOTICES MAILED: 51 notices were mailed.
2. Background
On June 23, 1983, the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission
annexed the subject properties to the City of Tigard.
In June 1983, the City agreed to utilize the County's land use
designation for the annexation area. These designations were closely
matched to City designations.
In April 1983, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted
the land use designations for the Bull Mountain Community Plan CPO
#9. This document was later adopted with the other po rtions of the
County Comprehensive Plan via an engrossment ordinance.
3. Vicinity Information
The surrounding land uses are as follows:
The areas to the north of Upper Scholls Ferry Road are designated for
single family residential with the City of Beaverton.
The areas to the south of the subject area are also designated for
single family residential, and are within Washington County.
The areas to the east and west of the site are designated for medium
to medium-high density residential, and are within Washington County
on the west and the City of Tigard on the east.
4. Site Information
The area within the annexation contains 131.95 acres, divided into 14
parcels under 11 separate ownerships.
The property is fairly flat with 2 swales and some clusters of
natural fir and oak. The southerly portion of the site which is at
the base of Bull Mountain has steeper topography, up to 8% slopes.
There are 5 single family residences within the annexation area; all
of which are owner occupied.
B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES
1. Comprehensive Plan Policies
All of the comprehensive plan policies were reviewed in light of this
comprehensive plan amendment. This amendment proposal generally
meets the plan policies related to citizen involvement,
transportation, public facilities, urbanization, and natural features
and open space.
The specific policies that pertain to the land use designation are
found in the Locational Criteria, and are as follows:
Residential:
12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH:
STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 2
a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
Medium Density Residential
A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas
designated for medium density on the plan map:
(1) Areas which are not committed to low density development.
(2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial
streets.
(3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as
topography, flooding, poor drainage.
(4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for
additional development.
(5) Areas within one half of a mile of public transportation.
(6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas
in order to maximize the privacy of established low density
residential areas.
B. The following factors will be determinants of density ranges allowed
through zoning in the medium density planned area:
(1) The density of development in areas historically zoned for
medium density development.
(2) The topography and natural features of the area and the degree
of possible buffering from established low density residential
areas.
(3) The capacity of the services.
(4) The distance to the public transit.
(5) The distance to neighborhood or general commercial centers and
office business centers.
(6) The distance from public open space.
Medium-High and High Density Residential
A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas
designated for high density on the plan map:
(1) Areas which are not committed to low density development.
(2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas
in order to maximize the privacy of established low density
residential areas.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 3
(3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or
arterial street.
(4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations.
(5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for
additional development.
(6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit.
(7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general
commercial shopping centers or business and office centers.
(8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space.
In reviewing the Locational Criteria, it is important to keep in mind that
these criteria are general guidelines, and each site may not specifically
meet each criteria.
The criteria for Medium and Medium-High Density residential areas
generally speak to the capacity of public facilities and services to
service the area given its more intensive use. The following summary of
those facilities and services indicate that there are adequate services or
reasonable means in which to acquire such services.
1. Sanitary Sewer Service. An 8" city sewer line is available at 135th
Ave. and Morning Hill Drive. A 24" sewer trunk line is located 1200
feet to the east at 130th Ave. This trunk will be extended due west
across the norther portion of the territory by the Scholls Trunk
L.I.D. formed by the City of Beaverton to serve southwest Beaverton
near the P.G.E. site at Murray Rd. and Scholls Ferry Rd. The L.I.D.
will also extend the trunk due west between Old Scholls Ferry and new
Scholls Ferry Roads. From this trunk the bulk of the annexation area
could be served by extending a lateral due south through the
territory. The remainder of the territory could be served by
extension of existing city mains.
2. Water Service. Water service in the area is provided by the Tigard
Water District. Tax Lots 100 and 101 at the south end of the
proposal are within the boundary of the district. The remainder of
the territory is not within the district, and an annexation to the
Tigard Water District would be necessary.
The water district has a 16" water line running along SW 135th to
approximately the middle of the proposed annexation. The water
district's facilities have been designed to provide service west to
Scholls Ferry Road.
3. Fire. The territory is within the boundary of Washington County RFPD
#1 which also serves the northern portion of the City of Tigard.
This district is very large and can easily handle development of the
property.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 4
l _ -
4. Transportation. The subject property is served by 135th Ave. and
Scholls Ferry Road. Scholls is sufficiently improved to accommodate
urban development. However, street widening and realignment of the
Murray Blvd. , and the Old and new Scholls Ferry Roads intersections,
will be necessary before full urban development occurs. 135th Ave.
needs major improvements before much urban development can occur.
Currently, a joint City/County Street L.I.D. study is in process for
135th Ave.
The 135th Ave. improvement feasibility study is expected to be
complete in 2 to 3 months. Upon completion, a public hearing will be
held to determine whether to form the L.I.D. Land owners both in the
City and in the annexation area are in support of the L.I.D.
5. Schools. The territory is within the Beaverton School District. The
following information was provided by the major petitioner:
The three schools that serve this area, their existing enrollment and
capacity are shown below:
Type School Name Capacity Existing Enrollment
Elementary McKay 384 254
Intermediate Whitford 1050 963
High Beaverton 1800 1768
The school district indicates that adequate school capacity exists,
however, some boundary or schedule changes may be necessary to
accommodate anticipated students from the subject property.
Police service, parks, library, and general administrative services are
available to the area.
Commercial:
12.2.1 THE CITY SHALL:
a. PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE TYPE OF USE, ITS
SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA.
b. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES.
c. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE
SCALE OF THE PROJECT.
1. Neighborhood Commercial
Neighborhood commercial centers are intended to provide convenience
goods and services within a cluster of stores. Convenience goods are
goods which are bought frequently, at least weekly, and for which
people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses permitted in
the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops,
barber shops and repair shops. The range of uses is limited to those
uses which can be sustained by a limited trade area.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 5
•
•
A. Scale
(1) Trade Area. Up to 5000 people.
(2) Site Size. Two acre maximum.
•
(3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies.
B. Locational Criteria
(1) Spacing and Location
(a) The service area radius for a neighborhood commercial
center shall be at least one half of a mile.
(b) Commercial development shall be limited to one quadrant
of a street intersection or where there is no street
intersection, to one side of the street.
(2) Access
(1) The proposed center or expansion of an existing center
shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety
problem. Such a determination shall be based on the
street capacity, existing and projected traffic
volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements
and the traffic generating characteristics of the most
intensive use allowed in the zone.
(b) The site shall have direct access from one of the
following:
(i) An arterial.
(ii) A collector street which will not direct traffic
through local neighborhood streets.
(3) Site Characteristics. The site shall be of a size which
can accommodate the present and future uses, but shall not
exceed two acres.
(4) Impact Assessment
(a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the
surrounding uses.
(b) The site configuration and characteristics and
relationship to the street system shall be such that
privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be
maintained.
(c) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique features
into the site design and development plan.
(d) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not
interfere with adjoining non-residential uses.
There are two remaining issues to be resolved concerning the Neighborhood
Commercial area. The first issue concerns the location of the area.
Currently, it is located on the steepest portion of the site (about 8%
slopes) which is not conducive for commercial development. In addition,
there is a good possibility that the location shown may not be the most
logical location once the final road configuration for the area is
determined: that being Murray Road. Staff has consulted with the major
property owner of the area and have agreed that when the actual road
alignment is finalized, the City will request a comprehensive plan •
amendment change for neighborhood commercial if it is necessary.
STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 6
The second issue concerns the size of the Neighborhood Commercial area.
The County comprehensive plan has designated 4 acres for commercial area
while the City's locational criteria sets a 2 acre maximum.. Although the
acreage is excessive according to standard, staff believes that during
this interim time, before the final development plans are reviewed
(including road alignments), the designated acreage is appropriate. Until
that time, staff believes it is appropriate to adopt the County's
designations as indicated on the CPO #4 Bull Mountain Community Plan.
2. Zoning District Map
All of the proposed zoning district changes are consistent with the
comprehensive plan designations.
Medium Density Residential = A-12 (Multiple Family)
Medium-High Density Residential = A-20 (Multiple Family)
Commercial-Neighborhood = C-N (Neighborhood Commercial)
i
PR AR D B : Jeremy Coursolle APP 1VED BY: William A. Monahan
Associate Planner Director of Planning
and Development
JM:pm/0105 P
STAFF REPORT CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 Page 7
Krueger
14655 NW Hunters Drive
Beaverton, Oregon 97006
Duggan
11035 SW 135th St.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Scott-Erickson Properties
%Halvorson
10525 SW Clydesdale P1.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Nelson
11295 SW 135th
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Coe
11115 SW 135th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97223
Wright
%Fulop/Gross
720 SW Washington St.
Portland, Oregon 97205
Jackman % Woodworth
1240 Simonson Court
San Jose, Calif. 05121
Fulop
Rt. I Box 347
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
Aszman
12085 S.W. 135th
Tigard, Oregon 97223
II
�/ r •.r.�II I. b� ;�jlll��l li._ 1 ,--= ail l ! � �,-
I
II _•\ I 11 ; �'- 11y%i' lI -'.I b I`' b I, ,j 1... -. , ', II,-I'I •-•
IC:lBAVEI, Proposal AaMIO \ I V �. T� � .i1 --
II
.. ii
if r-
Q. �,-: L ;
1L.41 . ►f�r .r»:�y \ � I —••I I ■ �I 1? / I �, ` .11 is r�1
` e.-------•
1;I ;--14 IL_ it II 111; ••
�• II ww. °„/\ M $/s! ! , 111 ' � - .• --v----, -� =1' 1 •9 r. :+n p.AREA fl ''',....1--. , ^r,� 1(= II; ; \ I 1 i r1 ; , �� ,..;„, / i,•\\ r I ��, jI� g ` `Ii `JI Ir'r N 5 .. \•` `\_41\l.;l I
TO BE I �` it ,
1� V T� I 0�r} j•lI 9• 1 I : II r•. ..� /r l t� ‘ 11.1.,.1 ril 1•4. AN1Y•Ea(EU 1• .1 ,t/ L.(, \\� . ' c1 ^3. •�. /\ ` s, .1. I Mrstdt N •„,..w 1
e if �' L .. -.•
1 � li I r ° p R "'•, •tit r ^.' w.ua `;. / 1 •„
I.
ftif .wu.. II• .. .' Iat . c 11 /' .i T ♦.
..li ii ilk.t__TI,,L—',„:„.„ ----., 11 1:;.1,1,...:.1.."--- , . 1 .....!n. 'L____\l‘Q...4c.:.,s.N. •`..,‘,,,, ,,/,7.:!';,;•/.' ••' ...;(3-!!,!----'‘■;:..., %
.17.47 1.„., 4,/„.1 t... , \;...)..,:.,.;:-, ., ,''; I V:•
•
�� I
� //' /(� (N I, -- /G_ ...., ) 1 4 }off '�
IOlUUNTS. _i I. qtr r" J 1 �� \ •\1�•
IL i'l •4 I it .1 II 'I/ `% !' �_ f•rl t- 1. Q 1,r— �1»..�.,�,.. d ,\,
i 1 1i lt�l . - 1,•)".'''•n.
1{ ' :I �J 41 - ---- - ,,,..1 �I 1. .1 ,. ,.- _ _ _ , •T I,• °'•:'-"TIGARD
.I Ire— T i il. i •,) as 10.crs
• •,1 I ` I; I ,l! I II I —�A 1\ I 'I . II
II KING CITY,rr, .��. ``I != '-` _ 1 �!; _ iI TIG' y ii 1':
1, Il gl:d _ `1
w! = �� -.,. .k': - 1 .■In I�,. III ` z >\\
�-°- I — r '��� I I i ill 1 A » � '-a
1`If1111 '� ny . 1 :II
•
ill y-'i=1
; I 1..+f—,�11 l !; � _ _ 1 �l�
�rI 111 L1�1( •. 1. ...1c.._ 'I , _ J
(11/11_i Ij • ` •,
•1•
tIl ;( I It/ii
\y. l; .1 1 1I DURHAM I 1l r h; f
ij I!,• it p,y t{,1' j _ _._i.I1, 1) 'I r M uo 1 /I �11` li r I !,
.".\\
\\\...............
` ) r, j ,l G\ ., I �I /i01�
mil,- -,la..., II w�I ; (I�l��� I i ' -�� 1 /�\ j�� t1•
,) M
.e-' - PROPOSAL NO. 1909 IN 1�,,«., { '� '
1 CITY OF TIGARD a1 iL-- - -,,,, — .. •,w,krcipc,i,k.i 1
ANNEXATION I `^ , r==-r ?I
►,v „✓'" FIGURE 1 ,—.r -" I �'�1 '..'
•. . ELI `� ---1 ,/�. 1 li
•
\ -,
SWIA c'7CTION 33 T IS RIW WM.
IS I
:
' siNGT ON CC.o.1 i 0 EGON 1:1.
....
SCALE i",200 1;
6 44.
Proposal Nr). i 90 9 1
,h:
st C MAT
IS,3 :41 ..,
•
Oil .F.E.:3
1. 4,.3S 0 \/
/ 71r
--./
I,MY...“.
I 0■1°' ......00
I:
\ . 1 i
/-------
....„....„..........„.....„......„...„..........
,
°''' I I -i ., i 1
.
-.
_______----r•
I,
L L il
1 21,, IR 34D - z ir-
.......— r.---
\ ...,
i c
ig
2 ,... .....21.-- ....4 g
Z 2 1 34L 1 / i ..,.., . ...",..A.. j 11.05/ '44
1
,/ L •••••• : -___,,,,_, , 3 7 .,,>"-/ '''' 44*C".‘ 1 ::
■: 'e ------71----- ---:"--- \ /4•--------4— '
31
-.2;/ _
/ ANC H U ,Y V EIR " , TRAC Tr sss ma.
lug ...„.•_
.. . is , 330
32 I ■:,., ,.. I ,. : ,. 1 /4%., .1, ; 1°' 1.57:4•2—
soo,
•494
I /
, r z...
i, i ' • / ,/'
i)
-"I
I
I
- •
..,...v'"4 3" ,, • - ....t ty ,,,, '
,...;
11 1200
.....
,. .
„--7
I 4,
I
..• rii AREA TO BE
• ,
ANNEXED /_
-NI
li
32 1 13 /
9'1
.
174
/
/l .
Z lit,
1.1.
3 ' 4 fP:. .4”, ooi
..yr ,Z ' loo
1 ":',1 -••••••/'
• \•\':1-.-I t':I„.I;1.f .4:`X ,/s.:>/
,..,,".... .
„
7 7 ,
, t "..'. / /51-78 .
.---.
W 1/4 SECTION
. / ' /1 T 2S R I W
% .I..
4
/
.., ,-'
\ \ ,4,1',., -, ,/` , .S.i4 ■ = '
roi/
....„ „, ,
LOT 42 21
1/ ki'(' /-
„
4,124110 ,,,,,...,,,„/ . A ..../ / 4
, ■••
-.•••••••' 1..a.' "Sail MN., assiii- 4..1.,0-..., •,iot .
, or
,_,e, •' /// // , r/
x,' / • ,-
/ z,
(A'(2 ')' / / -
•
/ //:: •
/
/ —8 4 ' , ,
,
i ' / / / /
.., . ,. Z / / 5 1 /
3 4•14lutlitlututuall'ulati. Russia's gata•algA• •IMAISIM .
r
....?3" \
1 \
\ -
....=■-. .
•:;.i.. n,A 1, ‘.
\
z,
PROPOSAL NO. 1909 N
CITY OF TIGARD ..„,
ANNEXATION
FIGURE 2
I
4.1000i1\
MEMORANDUM -A4. ill
June 28, 1983 CITY OF TIGARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: NPO Membership
The NPO Membership Review Committee met on Friday, June 24, 1983, and
interviewed three potential members. The Committee was made up of Phil Eden
of the Commission, Bob Bledsoe of NPO #3 and myself. We unanimously recommend
the following three individuals for membership:
JB Bishop, Suite 303, 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. NPO #1
Ella C. Hink, 11333 SW Ironwood Loop NPO #7
Gerald W. Edmonds, 520 SW Yamhill, Portland NPO #5
If all three applicants are approved by the City Council for membership, the
makeup of the NPO's will be as follows:
NPO #1 6
NPO #2 4
NPO #3 7
NPO #4 11
NPO #5 10
NPO #6 8
NPO #7 10
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council approve the applications of these three individuals to
their appropriate NPO.
(WAM:lw/0102P)
12755SWASH RO, BOX23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
•
4
R M 4 .
f y•. .
•
It.. N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
• affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited.
to land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
. mental quality, open space and parks to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
. of specific project plans; to'keep the neighborhood informed; to seek .
• neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the •
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE• COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW • •
NA tE .
GAL o, b rm.-t, ADDRESS 5 2c .St-0 1%A
• kK ;ILL S� („10,Ti IU •
)
P ll f 0 R
Tk.!EPHONE NUMBER (Bus.• ) 7 2 _
Z'$ (Res. • •
•
PRESENT OCCUPATION
FIRM NAME bk,,,-,. .e...J • AC t F Ie. '17,3.i. t,,s.-clz_viv_. Lyt„ -
e• • HOW LONG HAVE YOU. BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? L., y Q,s •
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? S • o o_f•
HAVE YOU BEEN.INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? �='LS ° •
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: t- - - , ' •4,3
•
-242 , s s_
•
•WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?_ ( 1 , �� •
va 1.t•.1�to . •4- h,l• oLkP- .�
14\3 S5 'L\-\--T t ni'TM W�\�Vic �4.Q 1 t.ki $d t _- z
•
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: +k i t, '\,�. UN,'t� -,-2 __ 'S:>2.1 QS k_
5..0.1 Lap w royuq- hi--6,oA JAA$.TS q.- G(2.K tv..) 0ba AFH .
.emu. la 5 d
• 1■-.4.(14X})..
'T 2 ..'-.- f?..0 .t 1131. J c� i>>e r'. ,______ ore
Y r WI...
•_.2 4.-.te,_=v'1-ow_ + 't' e`AT l e,.+5 S ti e-L. 1 6 t w 6- • ,,,J r w W S���
•iv!. toe .. A+.0 4 1C- NI e,v..t e- *ek41-5 1---- o'{-a Nk`-1 Is t.5' '
DAYTIME TEL.EPIIONE NUMBEt — -
•
/1/ 0
/1/,1 11/, y -.G) 198
3
N P O 461s7
A P P L I C A T I O N U()
QUESTION:
What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to land use zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
NAME J <. ADDRESS 11. '333 S W ' 'wo,,,,A Y p
„T'k nv.(1 , n o.a.3
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) (Res.)_ (p 3 q 5q1
PRESENT OCCUPATION `'` e 1 ,4a- A 1 ca . ' \A(S t.�" _6,041 f"
FIRM NAME L,),/,
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? �'to
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED. WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? VA
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
•
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO? _
-"YY14fY'1 `"\' \ L-p'p (l-r
`cC , n --(b•JUt..,4.a a(Q1 f
n 3 cvi.�t a `)c.. - 0-'1 'u
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: H :—v'e M + r k C-Uk,
\e‘ a rm CJV.vii 1.k.)C► 41 t L Q>
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER (p . CC l■
3/12/Sn
• •� •c
•
•
4f .
cf'
k•• N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the ]livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation,-envi.roh- -
. mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to'keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the •
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW '
NAME ' �• , 5 ,,4.f ADDRESS GtTT •3D ,Ili U ek/
_ a/ ,' ate., '972 '
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) (Res.)-- 2----3- --�` •/%,tee• /'fie• Zy, -.y/77
PRESENT OCCUPATION y
FIR 1 NAME _ ,,,,...,..e. 2,_ / /' /'• -
..
, (- • HOW LONG HAVE YOU. BEEN EMPLOYED WWI THXS •� J. eG / 74
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO/ AREA? f •
• of At ry_J, „,,,,440, "` .., + y .h .44022 he
HAVE YOU BEEN.INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? a/' ' '
IF YES, PLEASE/EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: - e. 4�,e / ' •
•. ,__._�. �i.f/ /i/�r" or ;
• . 2 )1A .d- /r' ' 1/ �`
A. .v'/Z!/on C
a WHAT DO YOU PEEL YOU CAN omit AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO? j
... ..� ,.Lr.-. silo ,IIa�i.: ter.‘..:/ ---
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS• 1 , • ,1 • - - .' i .1, •
----
Dr11 !'7N(f TELEPHONE NUMBEn __--"._
•
INVENTORY OF ;CITIZENS
Suggested for Community Service � `
DATE-- �%�'iD /9ff1
NAME j--2 i shoe RES. PHONE an. -6579
ADDRESS O or• is 1/I .r. .:�. D 20 BUS. PHONE ,21/6,-,51(7 u
2`f3— 9'17y (voted a'jai)
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD 11c7- )27/ SUGGESTED BY 27014/v tle,
WHERE DID YOU .LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Me-A,10- Ql vt i Catt, grA)Ch
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND iTesuJ7` /`///A ,"„„/r(4„ j „,vuf,"Ty
i„ UDU i✓4f iyr d idk /�'l �.�rl oI- rie;etr, /141..291..n41 II""G -,-64 i2 1=4, .il/.�/
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND 47,j=fiirrerst Y Te /h,U;. i 44' ► Adiey s T.
;Q Ara,Wn 'k 4e14/7 ... - / • , e
aw ,C4yd 11ja.X4,77H1iib WM A44.nt7r� `L 1900-s-ti'�//p"''sli:PiP(-d
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY �g"1e�'"
G/ °L Afrf il76, 440. "'}4 AEG .. /i ✓e ,i yr
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES 4,„ /; =r% ,,-_.`
.4 Z'�fP,R{/Gf ref 77444e# " ..
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) r At; P.// / ”! J-44
9;f0 ;T,,,a iii ,21i.f5e1r /tom /s'Ve /1iP, ��/?4 E GG / 7 -h ire_
�� /
/ - --r l
BO'RDS OR COMMITTEES- INTERESTED IN /we J //7em
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board or Committee
INSIDE CITY OUTSIDE CITY •�___ --
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.5
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 12, 1983 7:30 P.M.
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARDROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. , TIGARD, OREGON
A. GENERAL FACTS
CASE: ZC 6-83 Annexation and Zone Change
City of Tigard - Brewer NPO #6
REQUEST: For consideration and recommendation to City Council on
annexation of 2.83 acres into the City and a zone change on the
property from Wash. Co. RS-1 to City of Tigard A-20.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's review of the annexation proposal, site
inspection and analysis of the Interim Zoning Map and
applicable plan policies, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission recommend approval of the annexation
proposal to City Council and that the Planning Commission
approve the zone change request.
APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Dwight & Marissa Brewer
12755 S.W. Ash Ave. 16185 S.W. 108th
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
LOCATION: 16185 S.W. 108th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 15A Tax lots 1400 and
1401).
LOT AREA: 2.83 acres
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium High Density
NPO COMMENT: No written comments had been received from NPO #6 at the
writing of this report.
1
PUBLIC COMMENT: Notices were mailed to 11 property owners in the
surrounding area. No written comments had been received
at the writing of this report.
BACKGROUND/PREVIOUS ACTION: On April 24, 1978, the City Council adopted
the NPO #6 Plan by Ordinance 78-27 which
designated the property urban low density.
On May 9, 1983, the Tigard City Council
adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map by
Ordinance 83-24 which designates the property
medium high density.
VICINITY INFORMATION: The surrounding property is developed as large lot
single family residential. The property to the
north is zoned A-20. The land to the southwest and
east is still within Washington County.
SITE INFORMATION: There is a single family residence on the property, a
barn and some out buildings. The property slopes to
the south. There is a drainage swale along the western
edge of the property. There are several trees along
the drainage swale. The remainder of the property is
field grass.
B. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
2.1.1 THE 'CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND
SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE
INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS.
All property owners within 250 feet of the property were notified
of this application. In addition, a notice was published in the
Tigard Times on June 30, 1983. NPO #6 was also notified of this
application.
2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION, ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES
IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS.
All interested persons are given at least 10 days to offer written
comments on all planning applications. Interested parties are also
afforded an opportunity to speak at the pubic hearing on this
matter. The planning staff is available to answer any questions on
planning applications.
10.1.1 PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD:
a, THE CITY SHALL REVIEW EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES AS TO
ADEQUATE CAPACITY, OR SUCH SERVICES TO BE MADE AVAILABLE, TO
SERVE THE PARCEL IF DEVELOPED TO THE MOST INTENSE USE ALLOWED*,
AND WILL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE LEVEL OF SERVICES
AVAILABLE TO DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
TIGARD. THE SERVICES ARE:
1. WATER;
2. SEWER;
3. DRAINAGE;
4. STREETS;
5. POLICE; AND
6., FIRE PROTECTION.
*Most intense use allowed by the conditions of approval, the zone or the
Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF REPORT-ZC 6-83-Page 2
Water is available from an 8 inch line in S.W. 108th. There is no
sewer line in the immediate area. Sewer will be available with the
construction by Tualatin Development Company of the TDC trunk
line. The site drainage could be handled by running it to the
drainage swale. S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 108th can be improved to
accommodate additional traffic if necessary. Police protection and
fire protection are available.
c. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE URBAN SERVICES TO AREAS WITHIN THE TIGARD
URBAN PLANNING AREAS OR WITH THE URBAN GROWTH, BOUNDARY UPON
ANNEXATION.
10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATIONS BY THE CITY SHALL BE BASED ON
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
a. THE ANNEXATION ELIMINATES AN EXISTING "POCKET" OR "ISLAND" OF
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY; OR
b. THE ANNEXATION WILL NOT CREATE AN IRREGULAR BOUNDARY THAT MAKES
IT DIFFICULT FOR THE POLICE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO
DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARCEL IS WITHIN OR OUTSIDE THE CITY;
c. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS COMMENTED UPON THE ANNEXATION;
d. THE LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND IS
CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY BOUNDARY.
e. THE ANNEXATION CAN BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE SERVICES LISTED IN
10.1.1(b)(2).
The City is prepared to provide urban services to the area. The
annexation does not create an irregular boundary that would make it
difficult for the police to service. The police department has
been notified of the annexation proposal. The land is contiguous
to current City boundaries and is within the Tigard Urban Planning
Area.
12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH:
a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
The annexation proposal and proposed zoning are in conformance with
the adopted Comprehensive Plan Map and Plan Policies.
C. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE:
There are no specific criteria in the Tigard Municipal Code which address
zone changes. Therefore, staff relies on the adopted Comprehensive Plan
Policies.
STAFF REPORT-ZC 6-83-Page 3
'
D. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The annexation proposal and zone change meet applicable planning
policies. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward the
annexation proposal to City Council with a favorable recommendation.
Further, staff recommends that the Planning Commission assign the A-20
zoning designation to the property to be effective upon annexation.
A I
�� // -''ir
• °EP' ° :D BY: Elizab-t I A- ®n ROVED BY: William A. Monahan
Associate Planner Director of Planning
and Development
DATE: /(`.>l g3
pm(0103P)
STAFF REPORT-ZC 6-83-Page 4
•
'1' N11114.
NE 1/4 SECTION 15 T2S R 1 W W.M.
6 '
WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON
SEE MA 10
C°,. 2S I 10 SCALE 1 = 200 SEE MAP 2S I TODD N (
�� ses°szw °� ROAD °_
SW r o v U�JRHAPG c a 429 6eroe'
-129 3'
IIS 660' 40 593. 50 (5006 10O
300! 3000 3002 i 4 soot ` 1600 I:u , 5.5o A° 15
41°.70 dr.: 584 Ac 6/Ac 1.924c ,
i 8 a 1 :i r
I D 26h� 23''74 W
Lt
I 25 36
o,. Z ° f x3.21
r• U3 00 _ W (
0 18 Q .794c °
68C 4' 2
594' __- 687.06' 0
d-- o- - - - 337.06
342.O5
1800 14 VA(1,419 200
00 1 29z.os -63 I .764c.0 °■
66G• (300 . '' "° ��1/ '1/4.
374 Fri-- 2.934c. !�. �'
2800 2902 5.95 At.
0 I204c, O, °� m ° 1 35
/:1ue. ._� 24 0 2
T I_n 370
374 a _
20'EA EMENT_ - a84 1 N 202 0 Ac. 0
N 89 47'W 0 1801 °I _ 687.0. I .2
2E0'
o
2803 2801 IXl4c. 594 wI M •f: • 370 687.56 0
i Z98AC. /.62 4c. (200 300
19 1 900
3 ?'- 2.85-c. 5.21 Ac. s.ez Ac. •
e. \iV W n J I i 0 \N J - � J J fS '
q `2 - -0 n 2a 0 34
-P _. ..
6 c 2E7.62--- -S6
0 589°42 E J°/• r )Q ��
283.2' o ° 190( `,d0
loo I 329' �•o See C5�10670 a ' �r/ t1
203AC. �3?8>AD
2 700 I a
2./6Ac. I o 68zo6' o:
I o 1". - - �8, 666.1' - .
w 1 - ° ° 54z 1101 400
3s9' 1 ~2101 uD 2(00 n h
t2! - 130.0,. 0 2.29 Ac. 5.564e.
2703 437.0 02702,LA $.66A2. .369Ac. -
2705 2704 0 /.654C. 35 AC. 220 CO
L/6Ac 2.14 Ac (CS. No.13133} „ ° 0 �?
` « 150.0
20 at M 1100 _so - --I 3'A r 0 2 2 1 61AC. 29 1102 I
1 _- 437.G \91.4X. �. 61
., 602 e 401 zso'
2200 s 77°32•E (C.S.No 11594) -
O 75x.5 . m r"_
6 60 7.60 A c. _____p
p
{0 686.{' 4356 - 2 O' - _7_ -i
p 667C 308 35 - f
WEST 594' 1 000
26(_.0 i. 100
0: 25 Ac 5.894c.
••160 601 602 600 /.2340
I 1r
w 1 T\ rj �\I /I 2.56 4e. 3.26 Ac, 3.06 AC. I
. Y.
c
tl °
0 �1001 8.9°56'E 3620 .
3
I ,as-_- 395.1• vO.c. riCS-NO-119967 32 -
1 Y.t 3T 3 -- 6E1 23.00. F .
•
1 2301 N65c 2]'W -E 281,04 577223\'- 688033.W / f..
1
Sunday, June 24, 1983
Dear Mr. Monahan: City of Tigard Planning Director:
Copies to Council-Planning Commission-NPO's Subj: Accessory Buildings
Thank you for forwarding on to me e 1979 Edition on Group M, Division I
information. May I now, at this time, within a few days, receive from you Section 103
Appendix Chapter 11 for agricultural buildings (Exception: Where applicable).
Noted in your June 21st letter reference to private garages, carports, sheds
and agricultural buildings come under MI noting these types of structures are permitted
in residential areas. How does our current Comprehensive Plan address R1O-R7 zoning
agriculture 4 pole metal buildings with galvanized roof requiring no on site inspection
except when adding electricity a State of Oregon license is required?
From the information furnished me accessory buildings may be 300' with 10'
height (300' being ground floor area). "Barns" showing 700' ground floor area and.
one story (is one story 30'-25'-201-15'-12' or less?) on one acre? The Planning Dir.
shall review plans and make conditions on site review-for accessory buildings over
120' . Sites under 120' or agricultural buildings do not require on site inspections?
In your letter you state "the City is not proposing to establish any type of
architectural design review related to any structurd". Note in the proposed Comprehensive
Plan no materials are in language form for R7-R10 or any other zoing? Egress and ingress
, if needed, is addressed during the initial review of an accessory structure proposal
plan. This review does not include accessory "barns-agriculture buildings"? What about
materials on agriculture accessory buildings "whereas galvanized metal roof will either be
painted brown, or will be reroofed with shake shingles or other acceptable roofing
materials in establidhed neighborhoods to retain the character of the area? Example:
The City of Tigard in-1982 without notice to adjacent home owner's issued a permit #3318
for "MI storage" yet it has been used as a full garage complete with trailer pickup
and electrical machinery contrary to the intent of the permit being MI "storage"
agriculture designation was indicated and there is no on site inspection in this
established R10 neighborhood (the Deed Restriction was ignored)? Gravel roads were
created for "barn" egress and ingress. According to your recent letter the Director
shall "review" accessory sites but no, language on roads exists, nor materials? Permit
#3318 indicates a height of 12' yet the "agriculture barn" sits 18' high on the lot and
measured 24'3" length and 24'5" width and having a galvanized shiny roof adding 5' to
heights No on site inspection having been classified "agricultural storage?".
During my research on the Legislative intention of no on site inspection for
agricultural accessory buildings the State of Oregon farmer's asked for an "emergency"
structure and so this exception on agricultural buildings was created with limited use
in certain zones. Your June 24 letter confirms: "According to the Uniform Building Code
all structures, except agricultural buildings as defined by ORS, over 120 square ft.
are required to complete an on site inspection".
Under 18.139.030 D: The Dir. shall approve, approve with conditions or deny
any application for an accessory use of structure. The Dir, shall apply the standards
set forth in Sec. 18.130-150 of this Code when reviewing an application for a variance.
18.139-030 E-1: The applicant may request a hearing before the Commission if the action .
of the Dir. is to deny or to approve with conditions. My question is during the process '
30 days PRIOR to applicant's original request mailed notices be given to owner's of
record within 100' so that one is informed on his neighbor's intent and how it will
affect his property. (We never rec. any notice?) Seems as though only when the applicant
does not agree with Dir. conditions or approval may he appeal to the Commission? Why,
is all this power given solely to the Planning Dir.-?
18-139-030F2- Allowing Chairpersons of an official recognized neighborhood
Planning Organization, if the property which is the subj. of the application lies wholly
or partially within the boundaries of such organization notice? This Code provision has
'faults' as currently areas have not been contacted by the NPO Chairperson having
appeared without benefit of NPO input. <f7,,,_,, ,
•
1
1
f
•
1
,
•
i 60010361K4 /f:all) g3
t A„
..
.,, , ..
a M1-Oi
. ,
O.
/�
/fie
u:1
I
11.1 1
L
III
III, ,
III/
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 12, 1983
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARD ROOM
13137 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD, OREGON
I. OPEN MEETING
' II 2. ROLL CALL
: , I
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
(Available at meeting)
,
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ,
'' '•,-'"
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
. 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-83 - Community Development Code
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 5-83 - Bond Park NPO #5
5.3 ROBERT RANDALL COMPANY - Sunnyside Estates NPO #6
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10-83 - Krueger 135th & Scholls
Ferry Road NPO #7
'-, 5.5 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS FOR NPO's #1, #5 & #7
5.6 ANNEXATION - Brewer NPO #6
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. OTHER BUSINESS
j - 8. ADJOURNMENT
a. pm(0103P)
tre
Cl)
ea
0
....1
• •
. .
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
•
REGULAR MEETING
•
July 12, 1983
1. Meeting called to order at 7:40 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL: President Frank Tepedino, Commissioners Vanderwood, Owens,
ti
Christen, Edin and Moen.
3. Planning Commission meeting minutes from June 21, 1983 were incomplete and
•
were not acted upon.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION:
' o Director of Planning and Development Monahan stated he had two
letters he had received regarding the Community Development Code and
would be submitting them to the Commissioners during the public
hearing.
• Also, he informed the Planning Commissioner that Jeremy Coursolle
would be leaving the City as he had accepted another position.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
•
President Tepedino opened the public hearings by reading the
procedure to be followed during the meeting.
• 5. 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-83 Community Development Code.
s Associate Planner Coursolle explained that the same process used for
`- ' the previous public hearing would be followed.
Public testimony on Article I - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
f
Kevin Hanway, Staff Attorney for the Home Builders Association of
Metropolitan Portland, submitted four pages of concerns. He stated
he had not listed them by article, but would like to submit the
complete letter to address all the articles at this point. Staff
_a requested he speak to each article as they are addressed.
w
Public Testimony on Article II - PROCEDURES FOR DECISION MAKING
^. o Kevin Hanway, referenced letter submitted, covered items in Article
II.
o Herman Porter, 11875 SW Gaarde St. requested that section 18.05
be added to this section waiving fees for the NPOs.
•
i
o Carl Johnson, 6155 SW Bonita Rd. Lake Grove, began addressing issues
• in the Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document.
Staff explained that his issue is being handled as a Comprehensive
Plan Atrkndment and it is scheduled to be heard before the Planning
• Commission on August 8, 1983.
Public Testimony on Article III - ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS
P REQUIREMENTS
o Reynold Kordatsky, Solder Shack, 8900 SW Burnham F-24, submitted a
letter explaining difficulties he had encountered by leasing space in
the CBD zone. He requested that the Planning Commission assist him
• in retaining he business in this location. Lengthy Discussion
followed.
fr
o President Tepedino requested staff to research and help resolve the
issue.
o Carl Johnson asked why additional set backs are required in a CP zone.
o Kevin Hanway, Home Builders, requested R 4»5 be change to 7,000 sq.ft.
o Mildred Gloria Johnson, stated there is nothing in the code which
addresses the residential area in the CBD zone.
Associate Plannee Coursolle explained that the area Mrs. Johnson was
concerned about had been zoned A-12 and that the policy was in the
Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document.
Discussion followed.
o Douglas Bollam, 3072 Lake View Blvd. , Lake Oswego, requested under
section 18.64.030 permitted uses for Commercial Professional that
Y`, restaurants be listed. Specifically for the area north of 217 and
west of Pacific Hwy, known as the GM Training Center.
o Herman Porter, representing NPO # 3, strongly opposed changing R 4.5
from 7,500 to 7,000. They also opposed Mobile Home Parks being
permitted in low density zoning.
O. Public Testimony on Article IV - OVERLAY DISTRICTS
o Paul W. Hughes, Engineering Geologist, representing DJB, Inc. and
Mrs. Ball presented information to the Planning Commission that he
had gathered concerning Mrs. Ball's property. He had examined her
property and found it free of problems. The ground level water is
M49' and any drainageway would have to be man made.
o Kevin Hanway, Home Builders, referenced his letter regarding
developing areas being developed as PDs, they opposed this idea.
Also under. 18.80.260 a- He suggested a change in language to "concept"
rather than site plan.
President Tepedino requested staff to summarize. Associate Planner
Coursolle responded with staff's intent, but stated they did not
oppose the Home Builders suggestion.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 2
a?
Public Testimony on Article V - SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
Director o, Planning and Development submitted a letter from Geoff
Petrie requesting a "statutory way of necessity" be incorporated into
7 the Community Development Code.
Kevin Hanway, Home Builders addressed section 18.92.020(A)(1), (4) and
18.156.080 per letter submitted.
•
RECESS 8:55 P.M
RECONVENE 9:10 P.M.
Public Testimony on Article VI - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
r."
o No public testimony
+ Public Testimony on Article VII - DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan submitted the letter
from Martha Bishop which applied to this section.
Public Testimony on Article VIII - LAND DIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
o Herman Porter, NPO # 3 representative, requested that on Page
VIII--22, under Minor Collector, Moving Lanes the number be change
from 2-3 to just 2 moving lanes. Also requested a criteria for
exception to development of existing streets should be incorporated
into the code.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED:
o President Tepedino requested staff to review all public input, then
walk the Planning Commission through the document at the next meeting
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 5-83 Bond Park NPO # 5
A. Request for a 24 lot subdivision on 3.76 acres, consisting of 23 lots
and one existing house. Also, approval of a Sensitive Land Permit to
allow for construction of a sewer line within the 100-year floodplain
Associate Planner Newton made staffs recommendation for approval
with conditions.
o Ken Waymire, 11903 Broadacres N.E. , Hubbard, Or. 97032, had no
additional comments, but was available to answer questions.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
No one appeared to speak.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - July 12, 1983 Page 3
0
4110 4111
1
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
- ee Commissioner Owens was concerned there would be an erosion problem.
Associate Planner Newton stated the last condition addresses that
problem.
Associate Planner Newton requested that condition number seven be
deleted, as the applicant had change his application since that
condition had been written.
'c‘ • Commissioner Edin questioned if there is adequate buffering. He„ also
requested clarification of the zoning of surrounding properties.
• Discussion followed.
® Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Edin seconde3d to approve
Subdivision S 5-83 with a change from duplexes to single family
dwellingsM°`per staff's findings and recommendations and removing
condition number seven.
5.3 SUBDIVISION S 6-83 Sunnyside Estates NPO # 6
A request by the Robert Randall Company for approval of a 22 lot
subdivision on 3.46 acres with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square
•
feet.
•
a Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval
with conditions.
• John Gibbon, 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. , representing Robert Randall
„ Company explained that they had incorporated all the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and redesigned the subdivision to
accommodate the 22 lots which had been approved by the City Council.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• e9 Tom McGuire, 9975 SW Settler, objected to the addition of another lot
since the Planning Commission had already approved a 21 lot
p .,
subdivision.
•
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
ea Commissioner Moen questioned if the turn-around is going to be
permanent or temporary as noted on the drawing. Mr. Gibbon responded
that it would be permanent as requested by the Planning Commission.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
Commissioner Moen requested a copy of the previous submitted
subdivision proposal. Commissioners reviewed designs.
e, Commissioners Moen, Owens and Vanderwood did not like the flag lots.
er Commissioner Christen felt the applicant had addressed all the issues
and the subdivision should be approved.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 4
J
r
1
• Commissioner Moen commented that the applicant had two things in his
favor, one, the subdivision borders church property that will
probably not develop in the near future. Tiro, most of the lots are
larger than 5,000 sq. ft. in this planned development.
• Commissioner Moen moved and President Tepedino seconded to approve
Subdivision S 6-83, based on staff's findings and recommendations.
Motion carried by majority of the Commissioners present,
Commissioners Owens and Vanderwood voting no.
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10-83 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 2-83
Krueger/135th & Scholls Ferry Rd. NPO
# 7
The City of Tigard is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from
Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to City of Tigard
designation Medium-High Density residential (13-20 units per acre) on
approximately 90 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is
A--20 (Multiple Family Residential); from Washington County
designation 0-9 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium
Density residential (6-12 units per acre) on approximately 38 acres,
the requested underlying zoning district is A-12 (Multiple Family
Residential) ; and from Washington County designation Neighborhood
Commercial to City of Tigard designation Commercial-Neighborhood on
approximately 4 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is
C-N (Neighborhood Commercial).
® Associate Planner. Coursolle made staff's recommendation for approval
for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. He
requested that the Planning Commission include tax lots 700, 800,
1300, 1301 and 1302 in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as Medium
High density.
e Eugene Fulop was concerned that he would get medium/high density. He
was satisfied with staff recommendation.
• Marlin Hoffer was concerned if he was outside the Boundary. He asked
who decided what properties would be included in the annexation.
Discussion followed regarding annexation.
✓ Russell Krueger stated he had only included those properties where
the property owner had signed the petition for annexation. Also
there is an LID for 135th which has been in the works for 1 1/2 years.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• Discussion followed regarding the Urban Growth Boundary and areas of
interest.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July '12, 1983 Page 5
4110 4110
o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner. Owens seconded to recommend
approval to City Council of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 10-83
including the six tax lots that were not annexed, and approve Zone
Change ZC 2-83 with a .note that the C-N zone may be moved if
necessary because of the road configuration.
Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present.
5.5 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS FROM NPO # 1, 5 & 7.
b
o Director. of Planning and Development made staff recommendation for
appointment of J B Bishop to NPO # 1; Ella C. Rink to NPO # 7 and
Gerald W. Edmonds to NPO # 5.
o Commissioner Christen moved to recommended that the City Council
approved the application of these three individuals to their
appropriate NPO.
5.6 ZONE CHANGE ZC 6-83 City of Tigard/Brewer Annexation NPO # 6
o Associate Planner Newton explained how the procedure works for
proposed annexations and made the staff recommendation for approval
of ZC 6-83 upon approval of annexation to the City of Tigard.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Waynetta Chamberlain 16720 SW 108th opposed allowing apartments on
the proposed property. Discussion followed regarding the
Comprehensive Plan process. She was extremely disturbed that the b.
designation had changed on property that had been established through
the public hearing process and was again changed without them being
personally notified. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the
Comprehensive Plan process and involvement in the Neighborhood
Planning Organization.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioners consensus was that there was no basis to d any the
request.
o Commissioner Edin moved. and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to
approve Zone Change ZC 6-83 per staff's findings and recommendations.
Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
o Director of Planning and Development announced that John Butler had
been appointed to the Planning Commission and should be attending the
next meeting.
%Meeting adjourned 10:50 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES July 12, 1983 Page 6
fl.c1.-_;.:.......
•
Ju-re. ■NISEEDING-,
_ 7)
.
\\/
, ,-‘.-4
\\-- -3., ,
, oePrH
s"- 00 g0C-k.
,w BON.r A RD.
49-CL
F4'
1-1AcEmENT OF
V ,
JUTE e..1014 ',EEDING %.07 1, 3
.4.6 ‘4)(1. , . di 4,
/ \Os
• I 0
0 ,..SC.,c1....k.. .
5w DURRAM RD •A
/ /'' .•''' %4) -
;J.:4,•,:lsiG --, EX 15TItskr MANNO-8 lli
/ ,- .' .., I i 0, 5-E ,,,c? ) • /1
■ , I
-
/ /
/ . . . r L 400 / /
I / ---- .' .-- I / 1
/ ;:3 l 41 IT'4 61:.../. :12.;;A:Ze;,...:E'.11--r-'4-.1 11:. P... •its 'Y•,. •,/,:,v:///1/6:§:::*Wil4W/4y4;:/41:CP:*'ehgVi.sill** 00::VP04,144:pA /0•_ _ --- . . / // / / ' / r 4,",r,ifICe/7/:,,! ;*//,•"§v,:'::A , ;,...a. ..9.„.o.4:g:M:t4Wmities.?4'41t0.1 Cr,s0.fy.k/NV!.0:?.?. 1,t. SITE
,
. 4.6.1 _ .. ),,.„,/,/.0y.;••:.•-.±,.. . h.,v5,./:•,,.,,•,,,...,-,../.:•,. :‘/.6',..,:p.„„•,,,"/.604..”4'04-41#0/04,•.,.zw...,......ilim.......,-.9.4/1/.40',..,; •••`.X.:#4,,/' ...0......"•Al*...-144
..,/ ,/ // -7:, 7 j I-//,//,/1,s..:go,77:04,7 ;,,,,,,:.45.7..,,i,,....7..0f„.:/.....5x,%2 4,41.;1:4:::.'*....::::.1./..,;;;;;;;;;;11;;;;",;;‘•:.; ,
-- \
-- ' 50, - 45- , •
50' 50 52' -
55' 55' ••• 55'
. / I:-11. .pgiNi......:z:;$9,',/ifi, . . .;'.....k. ./..kieV,Wre/i.:4•4%."..f.:44.."4.,M$ q:;ii.f.r,I."?..(..44 • 7.1.4i..'7, :,/.
,..- i __ ! _...,_.._ I ______.______ _
/ •
i I f' I 1 I. i I. -I 1' .-..----7-1 .-1 r-;- --1 1-.
I L 2.30,:',
1 .. , ., /
••••• , , / i . .A■V ?.. 10,,/7,1■M•le i..4../4:::1.4,4*:::4 0.
/ / I ....6 hi.,. ../...,,4.4/..h4.,.......w.,..k..:WH•••••••::::.• •• ••• ,e. ••.■: '4,,. 4,•...... . 5
/
5 J.3 G ..01 ..18 i 1 --,:-Ti I ___-- ..
...- ,// / / I 47,....::::..4:0:,,;-/:40,0::?/.wo. el; 4.7...9e';, ... 400./.:::::W*PVAW...::::10,AO,4.,IN:. i 6';'.1.'
' .//1 1 I,.-..,•.•,.. .i i.4 /,...,iy.,4.4 4.,I..../4/..4.4••••,././4.'••A.,.0'.•••.11 ,•4.% ••*"..., •71 . - ./.,,,,.7 A,„
/ / 4°."://44,401ga.:'''''''..4r1''..., Vi•• .../.0.1„.„.„..;,..41,„.y,x,„,„..vr.
,--..... ,
°,,c-..±.- VT50 S.F. . 4400.s-F t. ° '----1-2-------":4 1'9° 162:'.."..+....° .1 ...e'''
../ /
/
/ e k %. •./4'.4.:?•/.....*6,;(, g,f,,,,,:::,.,,A..,,., i,-..;v:.•••••••.*:•:441.'•,A''.7-10),V,priv. X•f40,..../r 4,i ../.1.1pf 9,',V ",i,*
4) I
(1. " 3 -71.:, S MO SF 4- ° 4000 S.f.t Cr' ......44.°2,F t ar. 44°°S.F.t a".1 '4'4°0 5.f=
\ r I i I 5000 6.F t• I:,... ....°•••-• .co _ ..........
...-• ..„,./*
./ ....- ..-' (.... .. c.....ii..i.. ,e,,,r/409.4,+'.., .....4 7 ...051- , P/14',4 7,7, ,......„„:„.:7.,....::.........„. „,„../..,.,.. ....: ,........„,„.. „„,
.•.,:y.
...`” •.' "I'i'e e';•.+5Z,',NOV 'f;'"Arl.pir•..,:i.,•••4•AVet•P'...'At'l /61.45:044. I. :, -.,,,,,,..4/ ,40;.iii
1
1 .• '251,00 !!
' I . ......''''.....- ) .../ ,,....
./ / ( ___......_,..-. ''''''..4'4'4.'1',..r1'...'•Or''.,CM.: .1i' ''.:94P.Aap.ligi:4,1*P1*.*14,49.9+f4'/;V•/,.$,',... W.,*#''....',;•',, VIC. INIITY 1`11 AP
1 1
1 1._, 1 - .,, i ...,..,,, ..- /.. - ,,,,,„.....*•,,,,(45.„ • z„,.,•_. .4%• ,•-•.•,..,.#04-.4.9:,/.2.404.4,:::.•,,,..4z.i.,..'•/.1:4-V.::•:,,,:."g4' ,• - ----- --==---- - - --
/ I , , •
i ' ' / • 1 i ..'4ilkiN: ' .-.147.;4.4:'/?,f10,1.•VP04.,,If,./..,.;': 4,4ig"44:.,.I.'.'f'1.';:lg,+• 41 l'•
/ 1 11 •--I ----------I --------1 ------7 ' SG' - '''\ SV
• L_/ 1 ---'----- 50 52.' 53' \ 65' • •
,a0.0.0.111111111111111111111111.___ Niii:P111111MEM111111111111011111111111111r
MAL "00 I
■ ------ -.
■, ''...;:•.,f,.41;. .'i-T./$•,,:,: .. -90....:,.;. .....i.f.ig,'.wz.9.'.4:*".4k7.,.,...,04...w.e/./...../(07,04.4....,w .,::,.,,,
\'''4...47,0/4,..:',/./.':14:01•17:7.r04%s,',4=';,4k,•.'*'.. .. /n0,,,:h;"''''P'.',44.14''',;' ,4*,:Z.*fi.,'''''i. .Y. '
.,,y, /..,........,f,...••••,,,/,„..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ •.,..,.......,,,,,„,...,,,,,, :„.,,,,,. .. ,„.....,,,..„,,,,,„,,,h,,,, ,„,,,,
•
N .,. .-..,..HA., .i.kifm;•••A'47.'• , ..,..4.7 ..•,:.--,•/......,,,,A,A.:4Z40::;.,,,..,,,,;.,:,-4.:'&%=;;;.;,:;:.:.*,,.4,,,,A.„'",'1.4.W.y5',./..:' .
-, I , • 50
1 i V sl° .. --__ 1111
----------- ------------ 0111111.1111111116E1111111111.1.111L4111161EINSMEN Pill
., ....__
N. \ .'is '/.4'",.,..4,',*lkZ:S%.`,/.',.??..''Zi/* . •gi..••••,':.;0 .,,iO4,.::*/...-:....f:::.,..:**,.4,P$4'.*:•:rzyttAfth.,..<U'fi..',
• \
4
STREET ..o' • _....- •-.-.. 4(';/:3":4..„,49;:?;.,':/::',,k...:;!,:.::,;,7/ 1':',4"i''Z'AL,"YgO,41',..k:ii:,....::':;:*2.,,f,. /4„:.,./. ...tf.4::;W,0`,::;.:::Ve4'1...M;PkiA "...
• -----------...,,,s E5 0 NI ID a ■ -411411110111111ilim lin •-■ ------------ --.., \ \ ..?.1.0.60,1#0,4,•,.43.4,- -4.0":4'...."-.rft,;;;;;,:.•• .4:-•;,-;:•:-::,:g?•;;;•,,,,,,,--.:;,, •,-:=.-X,,,s,-;::,g,g,z„:„.-4/40-,4
a ••••a, ■Nommem..-5,%4 ., . \ \
-- ----------- - . ,.,,, ,,:y.eigy„,,.. ...,3ftrio,f. ,;N:. ,,,§.4,...::: , , , ,,,..„,...;
----- , a -- -■ \ \ \
50' 50' 50' ''''' ■le 46' , fa \
• 311 _..A .---- "11111111111111111. 18;2170117111111.----- ...50. °. 5a.. ••••••••••••••••• ..... .... ..••••'''•/......."......".........''''''' ‘ \ % \
•:Ni.wirtOk,' •';' ./.■''*•;:::/••4■I'M'':•'',V•' .;::... ',.../...1.•/...::::• ••.;?..?•:./...:••• •••MW.;?4'.*:V.:.'.•
\ \ \ \
-.-....1 ..-.--.....-. .............-.7 1...........7 - ....7 n.... li
\ \ .. . ■",:2,ri. '.-•+.qt,".''.•4;it.,Ar;:4,4 7:,:j:4'./:::•::„.7,:'ila',./.....f.;;;;;.,•;,.,..,.:;.•..,e...-:....,'''''..f..:.:.:.,;;:,..e.,.%..:;•,..';':'..6".::,.47..f.A.:*.f*?;447,7:%•.!.•
1
Ir.'*... ' ..■.......r7z.......' 1 1 ""•"'- •--..-'.1 I s'•■•...... i---- . 1 1 ii 1 1 ! ,
_._•____-r , - I ,
,
- . S. R.O.W. \ \, \ ' ''',,>/.'A.hil?::„..,' .;',:.^.'...0,4f.;:.;,,:f::?,%4R.,„'/.1.4Afi,.'..V:: :.'''...,::://::::::::**".'::5.Z.''.,.,:::1''','''';',:..." ',.:.:',..'n‘;'/:':':.:•;!;:.:?''.::::'::::.:. ;;,'"?....',.:'.:.:,•: :::.. ..:........,...
\ N 'S ''''''/4/0,,,,,•$1./AV/Iik*.fi""P=4".//4./Z/.../4i:W/N4/4,,/2/'.**/...,,T•1,2•/•••:•/.//,',/,•:•./4•/./.....;'2,T.I...,I.... : / ......•///,./://1'.././2,4.;,•/.../.,...,.:”111,•••/%1... '
.7' ' 1 ' I 1 } .. . 1 . ‘ ' ClIvi r,..,AT i ON .;„ ..'4 ,`,,...„1. ,:;)....: -. .:';':;:.:::...*:',?:::W:':::...:,:f:.:"':.:::',:':1*/:::::.'....•;:.•. . ,.:::•••:.;::,',4„-•,.."
.
' 1'I 1 ' I 1 1 i ' \ '1 . .
• 1 \ \
\ \ \ ....,//•; :'',/':;0.,:k;::•IN.,14.,,;:.''Zil.P,,•4*.0■1,Z•?..:?$1,;:.:‘•:/.. ..:•.,;;;:::,,•••,;.2.•:•••/';''''..::/..../..:•:Z/.;.',/,'./12.••1::',...,M:•.?'/II',.;,,,,n//.'1....;''.''''''`,4.:.•:',:::...;;/;./.:•:::•':%:::':'.;:;,:.*'':...,12.
'I'l%Y.••ftI:A5.1:'4&:0'/;;•IfII•:/;, .4'1.4q••.•;.•*/'...:•:.-1...,'N,,,:.•••••,....-::.•'..:,4.-•:,.•••........'...,..:.-,:.....y,:•,•'....•.•.;:...,,...,*.:4;•.•.,•/.....;/,‘.•••.••,..•.-••.•./.....,••,........:•;.•72....:.,,•.•••••.•
• EX IST. ° • g , g . zt. • , 26 -L. )cit IA. .6, \I i 17 2 , Igo ...i : 1 5 iloi, I 14 It 0 o
go' caw. -__ • 2 f 23 -, 2-1 - I
I : 1 a
- ‘ 4, , • ::: 1 \ \ \ ..,44,,,,,,.7amk,....., -;:-...A.....,v,,,,i/4;-:%:442,',:••.'-;:••,:',;:•'",-.-•.1.;-.".-•-::'..."."'•':•.:-::'.:::',•,:••-•:::::'::.4".:... ..5•::%-,,,,,V.,--,:-.-:;•::%•,:Z.-;:ftf :;•...:--ft-•-•.,/,.•-,:'::•/:-..,.,:*"'•/••:•?.:::•,;.:? •"'
, .
Otenc.ictioN , 'Ca
oo HOUSE
5100 S.F.± I :1 5300 S.F.t I 5500 5F.t I . 5700 S.F.i 1.15800 S.F.S.F.t I ;6000 s.F.t I I boo() 5E 1.1 6°°° 6" 4e00 I ,s-5-00 I vros.F.t. 1 \ \ \ ,•-,...p.h...:.ft„,/,,,,c,;,..,,..,..44,,T,,,,.,,..v.....4.,..,,,y,,T..........,,,...-:.,:..., ......-._: ,.......,..J.,................0,9:•,,,,,,,,,T,,,,.......... .....,.....,4,,,,....../../....-.....,,,,..../....•,•./. ---
•
\ \ ..0...,-../0/,:moi,!..J.:4::•..*:.-A-, `.4..-4.,.:.•:...t.4.,,,;..,,....A.T,T•z.,N,T.T..,.;.;:,...:........,:o.:.-.....,.........,.,„..................;•;.....,...r...,g.,...•.,..0.•,,,.„....,...,.,::.:0y:::::,:,...,0e:-•.T.,,...,:,...
i _ sr.i- 1 ■ s.Ft 1 F . 1 i'',.....;,..,z,..,7.,::*::%.:';',.:'44.,,,,/ ..m.;:.:.:::; •,..:....:::.:::,...#-.::.:,....;:•.,,•:',........:: ::..............,.......,..,:.'.;.......•,..:•;:-..,::-.4,......,;::,/,',...;m.......;,...,..,;...,........ ,.,...i........;•,.......,.
•
'1 . . ' --"' I I. ! I ,
I
r L Boo I 1 \ \
\ \
. > 7800 6.F.t I 1 .
.' ' ... '........=I I .."........--1.1 L _...1 L.__ 1_ „I. :1 ----i I i i , _I /1 _A • 41. .1 I . I I
I \ ',0'.../.....%;!.....',:-. ..0.,:.. 'd.‘i....,::',,,. ..:' ',:%.....:::..,:!'"if.:;:./...'....:.. .,?,..:.,-...;.,:........!:....,:::..::::.;,....:';'.:.,'„,:,..4,:.,',/,...:../...,:.::.,*,..,....,...,:,...,...., ....,.:.. ,..„..,..
. W'.4 :.:::.*"..,.:. ::.;:iPt:':',:',.:'.4'.:::'...:'...7).::,.:':......:..4":•:.:/...:'........•.',::::',::•;,;.?/:,....'.:',.::..6:,....;.././.:•/'::•:.,,,*.,,.
1 1 1 % ..;:f.4.•?,,,,;..,;,:,....pp,o .;...,;;;,4,:„,;:,.....e:.„...../k•.::,....„.::.',....,..: f.::,*;::,„-:.:::.;.",;',,..;...,:,.,.....C,/,,:;:.;%„•:...!..„.'....,,:.::::':,::::::..;:.0..:7,:•..;;,:::-::•....:',.. 1:..,/,:.•;:':::'•;
50' ... 50 _ 50' 50' ...•••''''i0'. 60' 60' 50' i • ' i • '', 50''''' ' ' '
. . 1. 1 `4.4.:.164:'......:$.:Zg:•:/.0:..?-:.::::.::'..f.•:•;',... :.::'.•::%•:':'.::::':'''':',.........''':'/''.40'''''''.:<:';':.:14///'":::': 0.4 ::'/:•':/:''..":://''''';:''..::':
k.--...,
- _......-...--....•....-........
..... 6161.9.4' ...- ......
= ---- ---•1 • . I
‘- .''' .--
• • . .
• .
C' / . - • • . •
. .
--- / . . - ' - • • . .
. / , • • .
. . • LOCAT 10 ; SECTION 12.C. T.2.5 R I W TAX LOTS 800 k 2000.....1.1' :' ,.,.,.. ,, ,,
.
, •
. ,
•
• o • ,
I L 22.01 3 • " . :4 .
r
0 . . .
• ZONING : 12.-.iz
x .. . ,
. . . . bho-,,t,?.•,-,.. ,
. . • ‘ .
. . • .
.
W . . • .
. • ,
. .
I .
. ' MINHMUM . LOT 'SIZE ' 440(3', T.
•
< • • •
. . . . .
4 . • • . •
. 1 P L A kJ ., . T.L. 1,00,
• T i.. 22.021 • •.-..., I- • . . .• OW NI.ER ' ETNELY14 t, CONRAD SPROUL ' . ,. ' •
• 40' •
,7`-. '`'.. .g. • • •.
• •t-- •
-......___ .-. ,,, \ 16880 S.W,. 7 714 AVE.AV E.
. .
• TIGARD, OR 9-71.2.9
t, 1/4(tiii,._. . . \,
1-..,,e .., ,• • I" = 50'
.1 1.
SOr Ii-, "..4'.' --: -"--i % 3 I . . . ,
•
),,,,;\ ''.1• ...../ ui I
, .
• . , ,,
' -
?ks.,-, • 1 DEVELOPER ' MR. KENNETH- WAYMIRE . .
.--, v • 40' 1 .. ,
. . ......4...... .....,„„,0 ,
. - . . : wAvERLy, CON5TRUCTION Co.
' „I I 9 OS BROA VA C12.6 S 1-1 E.
. •
,
• • $. . . . .
. ' ,
.. .. ,,,' . USE A D OR. 9'7032 • .
, . . • •
. .
• .
• COMPASS Ce.l'"" . • . . . ' '' •
. .
. • . ,
. . i . • ,,
,, .., . , . , • , ,‘ - ,- ,...
. , .
IL 7-2_00 . • • • ' , . , . . .
' .. . , , . • ..
. .
, .
C 0 41"0 U 126 :' ., . • . ,
FRco CITY OF TIGARD AERIAL. M-APPIMG '. ' .• ; .'
, • .
. .. -
•. , . ..
, . ' • W W I
ol
iCl R • •
, • •
•
.
5. W. DURHAM RD. .1( , ` Goo' . .
.
• • .,.
. •• 6o' .___;,.. ,.. , 100 YEAR 514.pob PLAN '(EXTRAPOLATED .F g OM 50 YEAR
s ,,, I - , -.-.-....
: . -.......--.--__....--.- --.-- ' • 4, •. •. . , •
' • • . 14 01*
• ., • •
• •
AND 10 YEAR PLOODPLAN ELEVATioNS) ,
. . • , ,
• • . ,
. . . -
. . .
1 . , . • f. ,
• • . ,
• .
•. • . .
• . -
. •
•
. i • . •
,. . ,, . •, , , . ..
_•
. bo' A.c.••
' /-1-- .0
,,,,______ _......,__,?..7.A._c_______ ...,.. , , .,t,• . .
100 YEAR `.FLOOPPLA■N
. • . .
.' . . . .• .
• . - 1-q-- --.
•
' • • .
• I . . • .
' . I I . ' • .
I 0./ NOTE FLO°DP LA I.N ELEVATIONS. FROM U.S. •A R MY CORPS
. r___.=:_-_,1 _ •
.111--,-1------* , •
-••-T ----- -------- ---____. .
_____
T•T'-'• ----_,_,,_ __-
___---.-
' .1: 0 F ENGINEERS' DATA. •
- • •_. •,
• '
,. . • i 1 ' • ------ ---c_L- - ' . • , .
,
• I i . . - I . • .
• .
•
• -
---i---
L_.i 'i . 11----
, • t_J ;*.i.".:W:1-'..:.,'•:•: SLOPES > 12.7.
. . .
.•' •.i..:•••.•,'.
,
•
• ,
. .
• -
• , . -.,-,• •
•
7/0-'--0)PRO-1\• ,
,---•--- bu I L P INC. *WM Lo OE ••• 4,1,,•• .• :
w. 79 TH sacTioNi . 5.W. 7 6 T H 'SECT ot■I . . , c y.(,,,--0 r IN'-., k.4•, '''t;'. '... '
,
. . ,
•
•• . ,
N.T.S. N T.S ' s • , '. , •
. A i
NOTE, Si OEYARD .SET6ACK TO PE 44. TNIS GIVES • ,. ,
\. , ..
• . . . .
. OfitGON' ''' ' • '''
FLEX 101 Lir? . AND -ROOM MA:DR 6' SETNS FOOTIG,ACk.To
, . .
. . ,
• . ..
, , , , - •
EXTEND • INTO TNE NOR _ 4;e/*II 8 Is+..; ‘,. .,_,_,,, ,,,,
1 .
.., .•-. ,,,..,„,.,.c, . . . 7-1 ' 3 I . . , . • • .
,
. . ••. •, ' . .,
•• • . • . . ,
• - • '
•
.'.
•
••.
..
•,,
• .••. . .
' •
..
. •
• . ....,14/4..43,, t, ..,..,.-,,,.'',,,':.-1,',.'.'..-..,' '-4;',:'..‘' "l,•..''':::'4'i,'4
" 50 N D PARK ' 4 •2-8AGEIVA 2. . • . . . •1 • . , . .1, 1, . •.',OF ,. . ., ' ' • • .. ' . „ - ,, .-, •,
i• , ' . ;.. via , - .,-, , ., .: • PTIIIIIIRRAIIIIICHECKID ' ,
, ,
,. '- „ ,
1 i. .' ' .NI PASS. CORPORATION . .m.. ... KENNETH . ,.1..•. 'WAY M 112'E . , . ' .,
,
t, • , , ' ,/.;
' •,'I, IT(wil Irevp$0, - .iTC - .. -„AINIMIONIIMIIIMMR • , -. - elliaffits., : - '-. movriss . . •oviiik . ,
WA V E•R L.Y CONST4ZU,CT V•01•1 Co: ., ', .
.0,..':-05 , . ,- -- , . . .. . ., „ ,„ .. . , , . ... _ . , . .. . . .. , . ... , . . . - , ' '‘Paiiii...I.t44. JiNA IR,11•r 91':4'. D I V. 1 5 I CYN: . 91.A4 T .' ''i • ."dLlii",: :''I1::1;;..7i,:' ,...•.'.:::k:f' ''i 4:'f'1:
• , 4,, imr t r
. . , . . . . ..am.„. . , . . ,,, :
,'WOL.' 40. IIIMIMIESYM,IEMIIIIIIILrIU. 857 1941 - I21 . , - nriv,41e«deri .0, .,:!:. ,,•". ,
. * • ' 14 s AOKIE OIVOON 07222 -' ', ' ' OW ,4-4-••-, .• ' 1,'' , ,,1- ;- • 180''' •'fig *pp, . ,e , N't HrU Bea%20 0 r.tt GO P4 981-4,77 0 : , '; "-•, : '' . •' • , •' ' •.,.- .•• •• .,';...:,' , .„,'',71'...M. `"/Uki /I' .' •"1
' •
ElIntt•O'',0,, :-..%41.-1',434,2.:',, I.iac'il&.T-‘,/..:`.;',,/...:114-2,,ai.4,■Z'111., ,,,,,.T,r.z/a° ••■••.,... ..'.'T".''-`-. -.........'"r - '' . •-'' • ' - ' rrl'....... `-/ . .. .
• ' .'' •:-.' '''/:2 .-..i.'/ .. ..., '',,,'..,‘I5 -••;'2,,:'',/',''• '''''.'I V.":.'''''/.:,;;'/TI''''11"-‘1":"''',:•,,, •..111&16114,,AMPASAV ''''..,, •' „ ,
1•./ , .' 1 ' 1 I.
. ..
' T iiiiilliATirtfilil litto Ti 44: Tr Tilitt :7, 'j 4194ifitfriiiiiii -,1,111Iiiittri'Illtopirporliptiiiiiiiipoisifrol irg iiiiiiiielospillsovii ......__ . . ,' -_ 1 ,,.-..„,..„„:-.,•I , ' . I ' j ' i
,
,4.1
,...- •
.
2 3 4 5 8 7 II • ii 12'
. N3TE: IF THIS MICROFILMED 4.,.....,..■.......................... -- -
___011DRPAIIIG IS LESS CLEAR THAN I , +a
s
; • . .
- - r-- "-
,..-.------- ...QuAtTrr OF TIE ORIGINAL
_ ....,-.. DRAtiTh is:71-n 3-131t-T°
,
•
1.'It ila ea it it &II ta it-it---ia---451-6-1-III-Li -III- -Iii • it*, cl al -11 ' 01 --11 9 L -11
wc6,1.4o sohmi inaluNINI004111510111111‘111111511616A
,
li _ _____________._i......_...................._._._.__._.__.___=__24Xt•.,! . y, ,,,..,,,,,,I., :. ,,,,,,
JANUARY' : lati' :-'1 * . .l.''''
4.,, ,,,,,,,,,,. , ,,2,... 1, . 4
.1',I : •
..--. _ _
, . ,