Planning Commission Packet - 06/21/1983 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
I,
� .. � � �.. . � � . . , � � .� . . � . . .. . i
AGE�TDA
TT�ARD PLANNING COMMISSION �
JUNE 21 , 1983 - 7s30 P.M. �
FOWY,ER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
10865 SW Walnut St.
Tigard, Or. 97223
1. CALL TO ORDER
7
2. ROLL- CALL
3. Approval af Minutes from June 7, 19$3„ Planning Commission Meeting.
4o Planning Gommission Communication �
�
i
s John Smets
_ ;
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
','
5. l COMPREHENSTV� PLAN AMENDME�iT CPA 2-83 COMi�i.TNITY DEVELOPMEIVT CODE
5.2 GOMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4=83 GASH'�S REAI,TY NPO �1� 2 ;
5.3 COMPREHENST.VE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 5-83 SCHECKLA/BREED/BISSETT NPO �� 6
6. Other Business
7. Adjornment
�
T I G A R D P L A N N I N G C 0 M M I S S I 0 N
12EGULAR MEETING
JUNE 21, 1983
�
1. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at- 7:35 P.M. . The meeting
was held at Fowler Junior High Schoo,l - In the Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut
St. , Tigard, Or,
2. ROLL CALL: PRESENTs President repedino, Commissioners Vanderwood,
Moen, Edin, Christen and Owens.
ABSENT: Commissioner Leaverett.
STAFF: Airector of Plarinzng and Development William
Monahany Associate Planners Jeremy Coursolle and
El.izabeth Newton; Secretary Diane M. Jelderks.
3. Planning Commission minutes from Jun� 7, 1983, were considered.
Ca�missioner Edin moved and Commission Christen seconded to approve the
minutes as submitted. Motion carried by unanimous wote of Commissiuners
present.
4. PLANNTNG COMMISSION COMMI3�lICATION:
a Direclar of Planning and Development informed Che Cammission that Ron
Jordan had resigned, leaving two vacancies. Disaussion followed
regarding replacements.
Commi�ssioner Owens arrived.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
o President Tepeda.no opened the public he�arings by reada►zg the
pr�ocedure to be Eollowed during the meeting.
o John Smets, 6830 SW Bonita, was requested to respond to comments made
by Planning Commissioners and NPO � 5 as ta why his applicatian
should be accepted for appnintment to NI�O �k 5. After lenghly
discussion Mr. Smets withdrew his application.
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PI,AN AMENDMENT CPA. 2-83 Communiey Development Code -
o Director of Flanning and Development reviewed �roc�ss staff
proposed for the public hearing.
o Associate Planner Coursoll� explained that the cade consisted of
: eight articles and 66 chapters. The first arti�le to be
reviewed would be Introductory Provisions.
� .--
�
PiJBLIC TESTIMONY
o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 5W Walnut, stated they had just begun their review
and woul�i be giving additional input later. First, under
definition�, NP0 should be defined. Also, under definition o'f
person, it should also include NPOs and other officially appointed
committees�
o John Gibbon, 950Q SW Barbur Blvd. , representing Home Builders, which
would be meeting the next morn;ing- to review the code, would hav�e
furCher input. A few items of concern �re:
18 02 D. Suggested chamgii�g ."citizen" to "persqn". •
18.04 B,. Questioned the language, ''This section suggests...."
I8;08 C. Felt this was coa�£using and unalear.
18.20 B. Concerned with "otherwise, sha11 be void", suggested
"voidable"
18.32.030 With regard to Zone Ghanges, rather than using the
P].anning Commi�siony adopt some type of hearings bo�rc�, such as
a Hearings Officer. Also suggested that person be an at�to�nPye
18.22,040 2 a. Concerned wzth word E'proof", sugg�st�d
"evidenae".
3 b. Asked public need be clarified by staff at a
laker date.
18.24.050 F'elt langua�e too str�nge
Page I.-12 e. "Attached dwelling" is nat a propax rlefinition,
he wocald provide sta£f with correct language.
3 b. "Condominium", also is not defined correctly. He
wauld be getting together with Homeowners
Association to clarify the langu�ge and would
provide information to �taff. I
�
o �ommissioner Edin asked staff to clarify section E on page I-2
re�arding set backs. DiscussiozY followed. I
o Commission Moec� asked staff to explain single d�etached and zero lot
line an page I-lI sectior► b, Discussion folZowed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED .
o Associate Planner Coursotle r�viewed Article II, Proe.edures For
Decision Making.
PLANNING COMMISSIoN MEETING MINUTES June 21, 1983 Qage 2
� : -.
� :
PUBLIG TESTIMONY
o Bob Biedsoe, NPO �� 3 Chairperson, requested that when The Planning
Director waives requirements or information that it be cited in the
staff report. He requested when additional information is required '
by the Planning Director, this should also be ciCed in the Staff
Report. Also, they would like it sCaC�d in ti�e code that the
Planning Commission, Park Board and NP0's would have fees waived.
Ue►der 1E.32.270 B 3 regarding written argument anly, they felt that
prsrecorded arguments should be acceptable.
o John Gibbon, 9500 8W Barbur Blvd., stated his concern for who can
make an agplication far change. He will be submitting to staff',
language Beaverton has incorporak�d in thes.r Comprehensive Plan, �
which he felt was adequate.
PU$LIC EIEARING CLOSED
o Associa�e Planner Coursolle reviewed Artic7.e III, Zoning District �
Classifications And Requirements, which includes use classification
and zoning districts from residential to industrial.
PUBY.IC TESTIMONY
o Bob BZedsoe, NPO 3 Chairperson, reco�mnended that undex 18.48.040 H.
thaC mobile home parks be deleted as a ,conditional use or written in
the code that the den it d
s should not be re uGed. Unde 18. .
y r 50 03o c,
' d
requeste staff eliminate mobzle home parks and subdivisinns as
permitted us�s and make them conditional uses. He also not�ed that
sectzon 1$.94 is inconsistent with this chapter.
o Gary Ott, NF'Q �� 1 Aeting Chairperson, stated there was nothing in the
CBD zone wh:,ch addressed tk►e density i.ssue. kie iioted that under
sectio� 18.66.030 C a minimum of 20 units per acres was used. Asked
that this be clarified.
o John �ibbon, 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. stated he had done a survey and
every other jurisdication uses 7,040 sq. f.t. lots instead of 7500 sq.
ft. lots. He suggested to make the plan consistent with other
jurisdications we shou�d change our R 4.5 zone to 7,000 sq. ft. lots.
o Mark Baker, Kinder Gare Learnin.g Center, Inc. , requested that Day
Care be allowed in Commercial zanes.
o Mildred Gloria John�on, 9300 S.W. Hill St. requested thaC Day Care
not be allowed in residential areas. Also, requested CBD density •
issue b� addressed in the code, allowing only duplex� next ko the
resi.dential areas.
o Discusaian followed regarding Day Care facili.ties
PLANNTNG COMMISSION MINUTES June 27.; 19$3 Pa�e 3
� _
� �ennis 0'Neil, Norris Beggs and Simpson, respresenting Farmers
lnsurance Group requested that hotels be permitted in the Commercial
Frofessi�nal zone. Staff stated they �ad included hotels as a
conditional use in the Commercial Pr�fessional zone, i.e. Transient
housing.
o Associate Planner Newzon stated staff had received two letters, one
from Arthur �erharen requesting that motel-restaurant cnmplex �e
permiGted in a CP zone o� the triangl� b��ween Pfa#fle St. an,d
Pacific Highway. The second letter was from Time Oil Co. requesting
that a convience sGore be permitted i� a M-4 zone when being used in
conjuction wiCh fuel servxees.
o John Gibbon, respresenting himself as a parent recommended tl�at Child `
Care b:e a germitted use in a Commercial Professional zone.
Representing Robert Randall Company he expressed his concern for the
CBD, not aLlowing light induatrial in an Qxist�ng mini-storage
eomplex. He suggested a possible sunset clause ar allow as a
eonditional use. Staff r�viewed history and TURA's intent to phase
out industrial uses in the CBD.
RECESS 9;15
REC�NVENE 9:32
o Commissioner Owens noted �nder group care resideiitial that in
addition of the term mentally di5ord�sed we should be using mentally
retardede She was also concerned about having hotel/motel in the
Commercial Professio�al zone, especially in the Scholls F�rry R.�.
area.
o Commissioner Vanderwo�d questionea why 3,050 sq. ft. lots �*ere
permitted in a �°7 zone with attached housing. Discussaon followe�.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
o Associate Planner reviewed Article IV Overlay Districts, which
include Planned Developments, �istaric Overlay District, Sensitive
L�nds, Established Areas and Dev�laping Areas.
PU�LIC TESTiMUNY
o Geraldine Ba11 asked staff to explain the �verlay on sensitive lands,
what it includes, how it works and �hat influence the Attorney
Ceneral's ruling have on the City of Tig�rd overlay portion of the
Co►mnunity Development Cade. Aiscusszon followed. Staff stated they
woul� have to cansult legal couns�l before they could respond.
PUBI,IC HEARING CLOSED
o Associate Planner Coursolle reviewed Article V SuppLement�l
Provisions.
o Bob Bledsoe, respresenting himself, quest�oned section 1$.90.080
regarding aCtracting insects or rodents. He felt this would be
diffir.ult to enforce.
YLANNI�G C�MMISSIQNER MIN�TES June 21, 1983 Page 4
o Bob Bledsoe, representing NPO 4� 3, recommended that mobile home
subdivisions SecCion 18.94.020 A. not be allowed as a permitted use
in a R-3.5 or R-4.5 zones. They suggested making Chem conditional
uses in those zones and eliminating R-1 and R-2 as conditional uses.
U�der Section 18.94.030 that mobil.e home parks not be permifited in
and R-4.3, to make it a conditional use in that zone. Then eliminate
mobile homes as a c�nditional use in R-3.5.
Another concern is the density calculation, they felt that the staff
proposal was more restrictive than they felt necessary. lriey
suggested rearranging the order by moving numbes four to numbex two
and thereby moving nwmber two to three a�d three to four. Then when
talking about all land dedicated for public right of way, it should
be all remaining land after deducCing the unbuil�able landsr •
sensitive lan�s and for parks. Also they �elt there should be a
density tran�fer for land$ do�nated as �arks, providing they don't
receive credit for Systems Develcpment Charges on the same dedication.
PUBLIC HEARING CLO�ED
5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4°83 Cash's Realty NPO �� 2
.A request to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to
medium high density on property located at 9240 S.W. Center SC.
(Wasfi. Coo Tax Map 2S1 2AB lot 1200, 1201, 900D0, 90001, Q0002,
90D03, 90004, 90005, 9D006 and 90007. )
�.
o Assocate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval.
o Marshall Sunnarborg, 7670 S.W. Varnes, propert� owner of lot 1200,
where an apaxement exists. li�e supported the zone change, as the
property was already developed at the medium high density.
o �3ob Hansan requested staff to explain the difference in the
densities� He waneed to go on record opposing this zone change.
o Van Dalton, 12110 SW 92nd, opposed the zone changey stating 11e was
co�.cerned that more apartments would be built on the property where
the duplex exists.
o Bruce Lindsey, 12i30 5W 92nd, opposed the zone chang�, stating his
concern being that the propertp value would decrease.
CROSS EXAMINATJf0I3 AND REBUTTLE
o Conunissioner Edin requested staff review what the surrounding
propett�Ci.es are zoned and what is currently constructed on the • �
prapertxes being proposed for rezoning. Discussion followed. Major ,
co�cern being that the tax lot 1201, with tlle duplex �n it, could �'
have the duplex removed and build apartments.
o Co�nissianer Moen questioned the possiblity �f changi,ng density to
medium for lot 1201. Staff stated they had no problem with that
chang�.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUZ'ES - June 21, 1983 Page 5
� _ — ---
COMMISSIQK DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioner. Moen moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to
recommend apprqval and forward to CRty Council of Comprehensive Plan
Amendment CPA 4-83 from low density to medium high density on all
lots proposed excep,t tax 1ot 120`1, which would be changed from low
density ta m�edium density per staff's recommendations and findings.
Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present.
5.3 COMPREHENSIVE FLAI� AMENDMENT CPA 5-83 SCHECKLA/BREED/BISSETT NPO �� 6
A request tQ change the Gomprehensive Plan designation from low to •
medium high density on Ghe following properties: 1070D S,W. Durham,
1035Q S.W. Durham and Zb580 S.W. 108th and Durham Road. {Wash. Co.
Tax Map 2S1 14B tax lot 500, 600, 601 and 700)
o AssociaCe Planner Newton made staff's recommendation fur approval.
o Phi1 Pasteris, N]�0 �� 6 Chairperson raised several poinCs oppoaing
staff`s recammendation, Stating a petition had been suvmitted with
�ppr�ximately 80 signatures requesting property remain low density.
o Bibianne Sch�eckla, r�epresenting a�plicant L�;;y Sc�ieckla, st�ted that
they had never been informed of a.ny NPO meet:ings, oth�rwis,e they
would have been happy to atL-end. She continued by requ�sting the
Planning Cormnission support the staff rPCOmmendation far app�oval of
the Comprehensive Plan change to mediuzn high stating the prnperty
meets all requirements to support the medium higtx density.
o Marie Breed, applicant, stated she had not become aware of the
changes proposed for her proper�y until the end of April. She did
not feel low density was the highest and best use for the property
and that it was unfair to her as the property nwinex.
o Laxrp Bissett, applicant, stated the reason the property should be
designated m��dium ar znedium high as it is located close to schools
and public services. They also have an easement to 10$th which would
eliminate hav�in to increase t
8 raffic throu h exist'
in resid
� g ential
areas. If the properCy is left Low density it would not be
consistent with the goals of the ComPrehe�lsive Plan.
o I,eonard Scheckl:a, applicant, stated he had owned his property for 42
years and requested the Planning Commi.s�ioner to desagnate the
proper'ty for medium high density. ,
PUBLIC 'TESTIMONY
o Debbie Craig, 10155 SW Jergens Lane, read and submitted a letter
opposing the medium high density.
o Greg Snyder, SW Riverwoad Lane, representing psoperty owners from
Picks Landing, opposed the medium high density. Zhey had purchased
their property with the belief that the adjacent property would
remain low densiCy.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER MINUTES June 21, 1983 Page 6
� _ —
o Penny Wills, SW Kent P1ace opposed changing the density from
low. She also read a letter from Lauren �ickman and Daniel and
Cheryl Duke opposing the medium high density and requesting i.t remain
low density.
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTLE
o Marie Breed, applicant, questioned being annexed into the City; staff
res�onded at the time of development she would have to annex into the
City.
o Associate Planner. Newton explained the Urban Growth Boundary and
reviewed how the properties had been desa.gnated to low density.
o Discussion followed regarding the NPO meeting, when they are held,
how people are notified and who to contact.
o Steve Petrazela, 9980 SW �2iverwood, questioned how often could the
ap�licant apply for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; staff responded
twice a year is the only time the Planning Cammission hears
Comprehensive Plan Amendmentsa Discussion followed.
o Discussion followed regarding the difference between low, medium ar�d
mediiam high density and the use of the planned developmento
PUBLTC HEARING CLOSED
PLANNTNG COMMISSION DTSCUSSION AIVD ACTION
o Commission Moen comm�nted that- he could identify with the Picks
Landing grou� and did not support the change to medium higii density.
o Commissioner Edin did not feel item number two, regarding buffering,
had been adequately addressed to determine if inedium high density
would be ap�ropriate for this praperty. He did not support the low
or the medium high density. For a smooL-h transition, medium density
with a PD over].ay would be more appropriate.
o Commissioners Christen, Owens, Vanderwood preferred the medium
det►sity with a planned development overlay.
a Chairman Tepedino stated he would prefer the parties came to an
agreement as no one can gua�rantee that a neighbors property wil.l
remain the same.
o Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to modif
Y
Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 5-$3 to reflect a medium density •
t ed d
wi h a lann evelo ment overla and recommend to Cit Council fo
P P Y Y r
appr�val. Based on public testimony and staff findings and
recommendatians a density of 6-12 units per acre is requesteci with
the low density being along Picks Landing and the river, with higher
densities alon� Durham.
Motion carried by majority vote of the Commzssioners present,
Cammissioner Moen voting no.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ,Tune 21., 1983 - Page 7
i 1 r
`
Dian . Jelder s, Secretary
,-.�_ ._ ,
ATTEST: '
t(�
t _` ' � ` �
,
� ,
( •
Francis Te dino, President
.
� : .;:_. ._ _
PLANNTN COMMISSION DATE l�l..�
ROLL CALL:
Frank Tepedino�
Chxis Vanderw�od•_�
! ���
Don Moen_„���
Bonnie Qwens !'w
Mark �hristen�__���
PEiil Edin�_�
Deane Ledaxett Y�}
n �d :
� �
�
�
i
l. --_ .-_ _
AGENDA
TIGARD PLANNING COMN:ISSTON
JUNE 21, 1983 - 1:3U E'.M.
FOWT,ER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
10865 SW Walnut St.
Ti�ard, Or. 9`7223
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. 1 COMPREHENSIVE PZAN AMENDMENT CPA 2-83 Community Devel.opment Code
5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4-83 Cash's Realty NPO �� 2
A request to change the 'Comprehensive P1an design�ti.on from low to
medium high density on property located.at 9240 S.W. Center St.
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lot i200, 12OI, 9000, 9001 , 9002, 9003,
9004, 9005, 9OD6 and 9U07.)
S.3 COMPREHENSIUE PLAN AMENDEMBNT CPA 5-83 SCHECKLA/BREED NPO l� 6
A request to change t�e Compreh�ensive Plan designation from low to
medium high density on the f:�llowing properties: 4U200 S.W. Durham,
10350 S.W. Durham and 16580 S.W. 108th & Durham Road. (Wash Co. Tax
Map 2Sl 14B tax lots 500, 600, 601 and 700)
� - _
� � � � � �
�5��� ���L.'��f�� ������� ��g�a 7_688g
P.O.BOX 370 f I IOIJE�;°.^)684-03fi0 PdQtlC�
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
d.��a� �O$BC�* �C�b�ft1�1I1�
� o � TearshPet P�lotice F'i�.��`����
City oi' Tigard
•P .� . Box 2339�7 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit ��U�� 1 E! �g�'�
Tiga.r. d , Oregon 97223
� s EITY OF TI�E�ftt)
A�FADAVIT OF I'U�LICATIOPI
STATE OF t�R�GOiV, 7
CQUNT'Y OF WASHIPlGTON, �ss.
��--..�_u�-a x�–�'.�-�1..��— —--
being first duly sworn, depos� and say that I am 4he Advertising
Directar, or hfs princ6pal clerk, of the_T����_ _�–[!�u-e–�----.
a newspaper of general ciro�ilation as defined in �RS 193.U10
and i93.020; �ublished at�'i �'�.rc� in the
aforesaid county and state; thaY the
Public Hea.rin� _ _ _
a prinf��l co�y oi which is h�rato an��exed, was publoshed in the
�nti;� i�s�ae o4 5aid n�wspaper frxr_____:L—successive and
cc�nsecutive in Eh�; fallowing� issu�s:
_J u n e_2�_��. --- --
-------�r �---�
_ ���' ^ -
, � � ;
-.�
5ubscribed as�d n to �i�fUr� nya� i u ��4--�-�----
�,_,� — --
� _ Na�ary �'ubiic far Or�gon
M� CCdIPi/YDI93iUtY�Xp4Y��'��1 E��7
��FIDA►�Bl"
T'i�e foltnwing wfitl be comsid�g��! by��t�°fi�rd �'1ar►�iq,�Comsni�ia�� mn
JucaP?i,19��,$t�.30�.14�.�A�'owi�r Ji�a�i�r�4�S�huol-L�a:t�are I8o4►:m,14h88�
S.W. �Valnut �L, 'd'9�rd, C2s. �u.rtl�er �nYn�nrt8t�os► te��� be ��at�lr►ed tr��su1.-#��
P�e��wl�a�Dfre�t�r ag i�75a�'S.W.r'�1Y Ave.s Tigwrc�; Or.Q7223 or by�a�U���•
4171.
I��3BLIC���t�ItIt3GS
5�z�t"���� �f� �I � � ���'{ �,, � . ;��i����`��f��t.'�
�NSYV�
'�"'����t''�n�����r�T '°...��� . �� ���cr��°s��atr� � N�s��
A r�ues�t�cS��cag�ttx�C�im��eh�ai�3ves P�tup c��s��netia�a 4ta� 1��r
a�n�k�9+ura h6�i densitgr�n prap�r�la�caeked�t 8Z40 5��t1�Gmnt�r SCa(�S/�.
CO..T�t M�P 2Sl �AB kft 1300, 1201,9000,8001,$002,�l103,90fl4,�1,
a�46 m�t.d 8007:j
s:3 C()1M�I�JR��EN3[V� .
PI,AN�R6S1�Y�1flMML;t�t`T fi��;a. . Std3�9�C�/���D iVQ�''+#6
� ��qe:�tt►ct�t�ng�the Ccs��p�F�►eri�lr�$Ptan tle,�lgnatl�r�ir�sra i+��t to
at��d€�nri 1►f�de�ft�++pn td�e tarl�aw��sg prAperdi�»9: 1Q��S.'@�'.����tn,
1035t9 S.W. �fwrhr��n �n�t 16a8d�.t�. 188P.��I3aer�atei R+�a�. {41V�f'Cai
� 'I't�A+XBp 2Sl 141@�f'Mt#�P��`�,!�i��t33E����'D�&BOliJ�
�k't�tt�x+CO��trtesa�RS z�r���! N pl�s�tn➢t t�►ttre�ratining I�li��
at t1t�s#fave address iati�d��ts##���a�����.
`I'7`6�9 a-�-Pu6lish Ju�e&���S"ai. <.,: ;'
Ut�'1'L' /.� �_..)� r�
nr�—�ca�e
NOT�CE: �1r.L PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIYt NAriE -
a�nd'nate their a8dress, on thi.s shept..• (pleas8 Print your name); '
ITEM/bESCRIkTIOiI�T: �
, ����
PROPONENT� �(For) ; ``,��; '��.�tr�,."��'t�}'fi � � � �OP.PONENT (against) ' �'::�
-,
, . ; .. , ,. , . :
Name;�'`'Address� `and .Affil'iation:: � •<<,' ;'�:i�ame,,:-�ddress and` Af�itia�3on�;.
'. ��r.� ;o Fi•l 7 dh'� 3'�� 5',c✓ , n ,�..�
i 2..,/ �.. �
5�'a.�. 'Q.i""�.v . .7�O 70 S�cl a �k 5 s S�.J �-�-� l�-� Z.�� S�� �-�. ��_�/
�. � � ' c�����
r, ' -�'1....µ. � ' „ c2 S��,v
`- ,
. ,. , ., ,e .
a; � !�' t/��
' r �
� 1� �✓ , 0 � , "
:{ . �
�:;
,,
_ .
,
, ..�
- _�
.
i
i
_ .
J
1
.. ... . � . � ' i
� . . . . � . . . . . .. � . . . . ��. � ... . . . . . ,� I
U�','1'� ea1�7��
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MCIST , SIGL�1 THEIF2 N�9,h1E
and`note their address: an this sheet.; (please Print your name),
�TEM/bESCRTP.TYON:�� C '!'-� � � " T�,���
� �6r►' ..�
.
PROPONENT ����(For) "' ' , ,k .;;, �OP!,PONENT ��k (agai�nst) �,'s i ��� ,.�
,v� " ,� �., �.y '' �,�,,s�J`i,fe
� , � .
. � . �. . . . •;�.� , , ., , . .
,. ..: i.. . . . , . . .. ��� . , .. . �.
Name o'`Ad'dress a:ancl Af fi.l'iation �' ,, Name„tAddre''ss�and Af�3.l�.ation�.; Y
!C4 ra�' f312t� P e/�t`�' R.3� '/�►v tpQA Rt9 r o R� ' �(�I�-�-�..^ (
�
'���C'r�2—r�-v�-�--' u';L'�' � � - i'�O � c, � �tWl. C' /
`' ,� ;-c �_-,�' �� '�'Gcu; 1...)�.,'{Z.'�.. �G�C'����� ���#�
�J %�'►" �3•W. J��� .> - r
, .
� , . •
- ,{, .
_. ,
� , . . , , , ., . ,
_ , ' 2,�ca�/:�l7//s2���//i</G'�- i
�r�.�r� lS,f�7T �"!J/2T�..�.�r.�C/�,�720 �
(d lZ SS l.�J ��r�� l%rE ,;.
��,tl�. Ul r��d.��-t'. ' T� �. r� �-, �7� � - .
�'' �:� �?���- .�G�Gid�'°�1e5+�' l�d�'v �S �..�• 'v`ercw��' �...
'� 7�` 2 p ". �'�zz�
, � .
� r
� � �o,5� � .w . `5u�-.c�e.n s L--h
•.� .,r.'�� ��.�, 11�%�,i G �r `cs .c�� �<-� 1`t t �>
_..._�
1
. . '.( �
I�
.�
. !
. i
I l
r
. . . .. ... .. . �. . .
' I
�
C
15970 SW 76th Aqe. ,
Tigard, OR 97223 I
lYo
vember Y6 1 82
�
9
Mr. �lilbwr �ishc�p, Mayor
City of Tigard
12755 SW Ash St.,
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Wilbur,
I am returning the citizen particiPation questionnaire, not because I believe
that Tigard i5 above the need for citizen invotvement but beca�se I beTieve
that Tig:ard as every other cortanunity in Oregon needs the dedicated involvement
of all of its citizens in harmony with all of its other citizens.
I met with the people who are currently legitimateJy seated on NPO#5. T find
them cour�eous and concerned �'bout the livability of our comnunity and to say
the least dedi'cated to doing a good job. Unfortunately Wilbur you mad� the
addition�l �ppointments qr reap�ointrr�nts of two peaple who get along like two
bull elephants, John Smets and me. During the one meeting that I a�tended,
there was a prepar�d agenda and tl�e memb�rs met and were prep�red to �onduct
� business. Smets° i!nsistence on the continuation of h�s chairmanship vaa�s a�
crude a deman��ration of ego as I have ever witnessed and I be�ame infuriatedo
Nothing substantive transpired after tfiat momemt.
That comnittee i's a healthy functioning entity as it is presentl,y populated and
t do not believe that the addition of John Smets or myself to the committee wi�i
imProve upon it.
So Wilbur, whi7e I do not want to serve on the NPO, I am sure that y�u knaw that I
have the best interest of Tigard at heart and would be delight�d to serve any
special assignment you might make, where there would not be a long-term
eomnittment.
Cordially,
GC: NPQ #5 John o Hav�ry
�:
� _ - _ --
,a:
. �_,
T0: TIGARD PLAMNING COMMISSION
Rf: JONfd SMETS NP0 APPLIGATION `
Dear members of the Planning Comnission: •
On May 25th, T9$3 the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) #5 held
its monthly meeting at Tigard City Mall. As one of the issues dealt with under
"�ther busin�ss," the members discussed Mr. Smets' application for re-appoint- ;
ment �� NPO#5. Subseq�ent to that discussion, a motion was made, which passed II
�or�animou�ly, to make a farmal recommerodation to the Planning Corr�nissian that I!,
' � . �I
Mr. S�nets not be re-appAinted as a member of NP0�5.
It was the consensus af the r�ou that..b,�sed u on Mr. Sme�s! attatude and I
9 P p
behavior as expr�ssed in his previous contact with the organization, that his
re-appointme�t would not be in the best interests of the city and would adversely
affect the functioning of what has otherwise been an �ffective r,ommittee.
During those meetings Mr. Smets attended h�:
- Refused �o recognize the elected chairperson and demanded that he be
recognized as the cfiairperson.
-� Refused to let the issue be resolve�l by a vote of the members.
�,
.
_
� 4 i q
- Disrupted th� meeting to such an extent that no other business could
be conducted and �esulted in the meeting being adjourned.
- Was rude and insulting to other NPO members, prior members and the
staff consultant, Jeremy Corsou]le.
- Expressed resistance to any ideas being discussed to change the exist- �
ing plan.
. -
- Argued that the existing organization had no right to modify the plan
adopted by the prior comriittee.
- Expressed an extreme bias against the attitudes and interests of res-
idential property awners in favor of th� ecomomic interests of
'i business and developers.
Qiscussions we have had wii:h two of the 'previous NPO members indicated that h�is
behavior in our meetings was not unique, but was characteristic of Mr. Smets'
attitude during the life of the prior NPO comnittee.
/�Jthough we normally would welcome the participation of a member of the pro-
fessional business comm�anity, we fee1 there are others who would be more
representat�ve of their interests and canducive to a good working relationship
with the residential interests of the NPO,
� - ---- .-----
��
. . .n F J �, . � .
For these reasons we respecti�ely requ�est that Mr. Smets appiication for re-
appointment be denied. �
Very truly yowrs,
.
NPO#5 Members
� � � ��
/
�
�
��,�c.. T� ��o.� ,a.-�"' --
� G P� --
�—
�
.
�
� --�—.
� s �
�
�
;; .�, ,
_ _ ; ; ., ; ; :�
_ � <� „ _ , , _ . ,.
i�� 3�-;� �!l�2+Z�'1 DB'if�� �C�DB 'B'�TBL�C' xEA�tltic `,. ''
P-.LANNZHG COTfliISSI0i1 — JUtiE- 2I, 14�3 PL'Ei1.S3. �ilGft t1t+:-�A TES?��►Y` = ;;
�+tAHE ADDBESS' � �ECiC I S1JE YO ��iiISH TO TESTTFY ON
,
.
� � � , � � H
� � . . .,rl. �e-1 ��+ -. ,e� �0...Rd . . . . .
�? � '� ' b
� ,� � � � � b a � 6fiHER (Please speci�y)
a s+ � ud •�+ a a, a � a► +�
5, �°,.��►'�+ �' +�'+. �' a `° .° a,�'
.a
o aa � m � � u �° � e�0 r° �
+� d r1 � A � d! 01 L+ Gl 41
C1 Y1 C'. A � . ?� £� d Oi C. W N �
b 'C� ea a+` �o d A °a o •�+ A c
o a► ao � c0 � .-+ ? r+ � �-+
►+ u •�, •� u w - a d a, a� •� �o d
� s�+ a�i �w a► a �+ � ai � � o�i
H aa � •� .� vr �n a � aa
.. ==c�:xasm==aszsaa.:ss:sa.s-azasamaasasssssss=aau.asssst�sssssss ���aae � aa �sa� s=s zss s=�-�=- �as .��a ��sass=aas=s�sssssassz==s:sssssc-=' - . � .. . � .
--l���r �'3r�'1.� > "�'" - �cS�';�ra-;/l� •
.�• 1.C.� �
.�`'-'�s�',I�. i: ���c. ��^S ��.,� � ���v'� ' � . �
��,� �:l��e��e 1,�G �� G"zC�.-�� —�� � � �
J
` � � `�` � - , r�, /, �� _.�ll �f � � �
..,,r . �:G / r�� .. -
II /
I ��N4 ��/vi �Z� J.I.a7 .� .N �DI�L4r.� —. ` . . . . . .. . . .. . , . � . . . . .'.
. � . . . . . . Y � � .. . � . ��..
,.�r � r _ I
�
I
�� �� �
���.�,, �. U�.,,u,s.. ✓
� ..�, �� � :
�.,,c.�.d-� ��- �'
I -
I -
,
�
�
� _
� �
_ : .
'c" '''r r' s�,'a'r S:S e t�', y� ;;�s: ,r.. •i i .z `ij: ��:
�, nu�,4�, {�.�L4,n�'r 11 � -t ��T! .�:. �,qi�n� 'd''i ,�4'A�;�`i k�RF�U.�'rw1.t� Sti31 i �.a�t n ..y; �' �� }�..��r, i,5t'�4t �."tt
6 .� 0l �` t, � i. As� � J} k 3, 7 �{��?, F tl',t{� p�� S� ��. �'• p�}..l � q i :
::E����z.: �t;;'�, �;��t - .i�s �4 , h:',,t�yiR� 4fiiti�.'k��1 'yy�t,t�:.i �",t :i..�.'�r� .�,.���.�v,.'ile7i"��+� . �l�J9f9f '�•. y i ��u�� �t��r°+'���•"
i r a. .itx}1 }51.;1.�E, '�� 74 'y u��:rt;4. � i � ;���'��'p S h� J i'•d��� s.ri, e$J�1��r 1t1i1fi' q� �i �F�h� /
��} .,t J ,r.., i.,y, -5 StA ;R�; i �� �`q,�'�`�`;H�C��t�;i� a 6 k;{� �l ;;�t d r J� � � t{� ' .'�� � pi k`E +� t���
�'' r � 1l� � . �t
�.�A�:;.•�n� ! 1��+.'.1 S-V�```t,r,r�",U°1 �� ���`.',uF 7:f��.: �1� ( q��� „��n"C.H t��1ya �Yq�i'�:�T ,��sr :r i{�+S .rl +, "���i�7,. �t�Z.�.�� i y{�`5, !c� ,k��t�Si�a,�;_ -r
�z f ,:Y�1�9�t,,S��,5;��, g a�', iar�1����J y���, '�' t,T,..��E'i`t��� �'N�}.`i�a� -1 � �i tr���� �i ,:� i �l i ,�� 4v y,G r�,g�,t f�� � ,er �gn� i �
� r b ,�� Yy � w �� � ( ��Y,�,�
��..t gi.. r�i. � 1I rv£�Y���J�.. r, t t
.t. '� �i� HOME�'BUILD�RS I►,$�SA,CIATION OF METRQPOLITAN PORTL/4ND .`` .
��� ;� `•'15555 S.W. BANGY ROAD,;SUlTE 301 � �� .�
� I y
�a' °3+�LE1KE OSWEGO OR�GON�97034 503/6�4-1880 �(�,��'�+`�. �`� . �
�t - , ':s � qt�i�,,:�.�sr� �`7 ti� ��
' -„ "
}THE.HOUSINO CENOTE D
� ; k �
�3 s d � �N" .
,a,�,�,��,�.� �,�N1 �198;� '
, ry � � 47��, � ,1.'�
i N�� f 1{' ' ;f� T y� �� �1�'� � � � . ' �� i .: � - � .
r �
' ' � : n . ' . . . .
� .� . } ', . . ,. .
.
:
� - .. , . . .. ,
;', ,� ."• , CITY UF <T�IGAKD
, .. ; �
PLANNING DEP�t'. ,
. ' June 15, 198�
I�'[r. �'r�-�ik .T�ped�.no;' P�esident
Tigarel"Plann�ing';Commis sion .
P..O. Sii�c x3�9"7 ,: ` ,
Tigard,e;; `OR.�� 9a7223 �, . ,
, :r
. . � ' - .AF.�� ,t• ��Zy . , . . � � . � � ' .
Dear Mr. Te�edino.: '�
This �is to notify the •Pla�ning"�.Commission �hat the
Home Builders Association will •no� testify on t�e draft
communi:ty. development coc�e at the �'une 21 public �earing.
The code��has just :been release.d and w� received our copy
toda�r,t'�Jurie- 15. That��does, not��leave enough <time for me
or`:'ciur<:�,nterested..nieinliers to r�view �he docun�ent and to
reach consensus �on. changes before the first hearY.ng.
;,;,,,,;We definitely intend to tes�afy at the July 12 hearing.
�}�,.:that time�, v�e�'shoiald, also ha'vre been: able ,to �meet wi.th
cirty;staf� to retaah"'�entative ,agreement on as�many o�' ou�
. .4,.. - ,,,;.•��� �
t.
eoncerri's'ass pos�,�#b�e,>.,,�j.We are �,delaying our test�imony until
�
Jul�r `l2' so" �hat our time and""the Cammission s is used most
ef�icientl .
Y
Sincerely,
.
� �� �V�II.I�
� KeVin L`. a�wa
' � � Staff 1�tt�r.ney
��
. .x j t .�L . , � ' _
�ci WiY��.�.aia?M��1°����� .,;
rv t,raf ��r k� � . . . .
M�. O�,• 3 S' �. '
y�Wi��.b ��° ho
Y. . � P� _ �
T.,''.1 �Alk �;zl��. . _ .. . . .
t.
�1,
.
Gary Rej�d �, ,.°. �. .
. i �
• .�;,
� . .. . ',, 4 .;: . : . .: , ';' �t1 �
- '1�
, 't::
+.
� -� y: � � �
y« t � � } 1`i.i.�.t '' 'A� .
. . ,� , � .
� , ,�. . . . .
, , , .
� -- :_— _ °-- --- -- __
Tigard, Oregon� 97223,
June 1� 1983.
Ft��E1 V�p
Mr, William Monahan. T�gard Planning Director & Staff �UN 2 �983
Tigar�i Planning Commission
Ti ard Cit C�uncil C1TY
g y oF rrcaRa
City of Tigard ,
Tigard, Ore�on. 9722�.
Dear Mr. Monahan and Staff:
We ai°� writing this le�ter in ref'erence to the Tigard
Community Development Code which is to- be discussed by you and
yciur Staff and The Planning Commission at a mee'ting: on Sun�7,
1983r at Fowler Junior High 5chool at 7:30 P.M.
We are requesting th�t Day Care or Chi�d Care C�ntes notUe
allowed _in established low density single family residenti:al
neighborhoods. For the past three mnnths, our neighborhood has
been deprived of: its serenity, quietne�s and character b�cause of
such a Day Care facility operating out of a ren,tal house i.n our
cul-de=sac. : The own�rs of the property are incurring severe
damage to their front and' back yards and the inside of their
house. Thi� inciclent has caused unnecessargr nois� with cars
coming and going 'from early morning until ater 6 P.M. My husband
and i find it difficult to sleep and I hav� had to purchase ear
plugs to enjoy our baekyard� t�ecause af the excessive noise from
all the children. Our neighbors and ourse7.ves bought our s:.in.gle
family homes in a low density residential area to getawa�r from
th�e inc�is:e and con jestion of dens�:ty Yivin�. We are citizens and
t�xpay��s:.:in the City of Ti�ard and w�uld �.ppreciat� yo�ur
consideratio:n to -e3i:minate Dav Care Centers Ax° similar faciliti.es
from establi:shed low density single family residentia� neighbor-
hoos�s in the n��v Tigar°d Cr�mmuni�ty Dev�lapment Code.
� , Also� our proper�t3r is adj�cent or aeross �he street from the
Gentral Husiness District within the T.U,R.Ao boundary �nd we
. understand that a step-down code will be used t� protsct our. ;
' ' nei�hborhood fro�n hi�;h dsnsity de�etopment alZoweci wi�hir� the C.B.D. '
and T.U.R.A.- boundaries, I� a 25g� build-up is al.lowed when property
is in the F7.00d Plain, density would be allowed to the deve�.oper.
4Y� are �equ�sting that the Tigard Cnmmunity Development
Code t�e, specific and state that Qnly dunle�es �nd/or �in�].e familv
attached dwel.lin�s be allowred as a buffer b�tween low density
single family homes in th� e�tabli�ed neighborhoods adjacent the
T. U.R.A. Spe�cial Zone within �he Central Business District.
Thank yau for yo�r considera�ion,
Si cere2y yo rs
�'J�r,� , 7Z��u re�
-�'..,% �_ .���.�'c.�.,�..�c�
� Paul and � Johnson
9�00 S. Wl. Hi1Z Street
Ti�ard, Oregori� 9722� .
- = _ __
_
l -- _ _ . - I
�� �v�
��� �,�
,,�
. }" � �c� � �9��
1��;� �
1� � �s�,p,RD
v �Y �F p�.
ume 2 1983 ���NN�1`�G �'E
JIM BAKEI� J ,
�ZEALTY
C0IVIPANY �
. � Mr. William Monaham
City of Tigard
Director of Planning & Development
F. 0. Box 2339'I
� Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. Monahan:
In reference to our conv�rsation this morning, I would like to
request that� th� Gity of Tigard alloia Day Care Centers �in all
eommereial zanes. Presently, the Community► Dev�lapment �ode
r.eads that Day Care is allowed ia some residential zoaees as a
eondition�l use, but t�o� in auy commercial zones. The D�y Care
groeap that I represent, Kindex-Care Y.eaxnix�g Centers, Inc. ,
typieally build schools ta accomodate 100 to 15Q chi�dren. As
we di.scus�ed, a facility of this size would create traffic
pxoblems in a residential neighborhood, I have checked fihe
zoning ordinances and found that Day Gare Centers aae an out-
ri:ght us� i.n Ghe followiug communities: Portland, Gresham,
V�ancouver, Beaverton, Tualatin, and in.Multnomah, Washington
and Cl,ark. Counties.
', � Since Tigard is in the process of reviewin� their Community_
Dev�lo�ment Cades, now might be an appropriate time to investi�ate
' .. �h� fsasalsility of inelusiing Day Care Centers as an outright u�e
in all commercial zones.
Sincerely yours,
JZM BAKElt REALTY C0. •
1750 sw skyline blvd � �
poctland,oregon 97221.
51D3 292 0763
I�ark E. Baker
I � MEB/db
RHONE 286-t611
� � �SEATTLE. � �
TACOMA
� . . � PORTLAND� � � . . . �
ST�KTON � i s �
OA�tAND T I M E O I L C O IVI P A 1�1 Y
SpN PEDRO �
� � LOS ANGELES� � 0 1� � �
e �
s
��„�Y` I2005 N. BURGARD; P. O.$OX 03117, ST.JOHNS TA � N '�7203
GASOLINE ��� ��r}� �����
,...r� �
�;.� ;
v.! �� J l.��� � � �u�� :::_-'
cs�Y ur- j�c���E�a
f'L/�f`dNING DE�'f.
June 21, 1983
City Council d. Planning Ciammissian
City of Tigard
Re: Additional vse� in M-3 Zone
Loc�ation: 15900 S.W. Upper Boan,es Ferry ILd�
Gentlemen:
Time Oi1 Co, wishes to i�clude a m�n�i°tnarket �:n�l de�i operatiox�
al�n.g wi.th aur fuel sales in your D4-3 zon�.
Our company feels that such an operatian woul,d comp3.iment the
���� needs.
We wrould Iike to ivi�e tk�e Ci,ty Ct��uncil and PLannin� Commission
to i,ns�ect one a� ozzr present lncata.ar►s. We Qpera�e a vexy clean
fuel, a�d co�nve�nienc� store operata.on.
P1eASe cant�c� tnP if ye�a wnuld be intereste�3 ixa laaking at our
opexat�.otz.
Si�cerely�
,� �`Z-� �'�`r�..�c�_-
Wes M�,acham I�I
Prope�°t;y Manager I
WNd/r p
� }�����
: ��f� ��1 �� t+
� �
: J U��! w �: 1�8 3 �.�.�' i
C1{'Y UC` �J1Gi�KU
I�L,ANNINC 'DEl�1.
1�;�:35 �. ti�t. 6Oth
:�ortl��.�i, Orc�;an 97�19
Jui1e 17, 1�J83
A�ar. V�;lil]_iam 3. %�s�nahun, �iirect�r
l�ep���trra.�n�� of �'l.�nnln�� a���;: I:i��v�1o_;���i�,,:i�t
�i�ty o:C 1'i����d
F. �}. bo� w�U77
'�i-u�rd, Or��on �7�,:;3
ile��-r T,,�r. T�r"��n,:.�1�:.�n:
�T'':115 ;?'C.��;;`S �t0 OUl,' 7."�C�CI'� CU.t�V°2`Sut1.OZ] �'E�;�I;rC�.--
iL��, txl� CP �onin� on t�e �x iaa��:1.o b���ra�e�. P{'af.�10 �;tra: t
az�d Paai�'i� �:���l�way<
mha .�o:�si.bi:lity �1:' a :�.ote:L--r"st��:lrc� :�, �o:,ip1 e�:
i.�:� ��1�t <:��ry;;� i� .�T;�r�r �ual be;c;uu:�� u�_ �:1� e<LC�1.1�1it 1� �:Cfic
� � � f.co�v to <<nc�i �,'rar� I��:��t�r�t«te 5 r�:�r3 !�i�l��.��,�r�J ��rl .
Tlzi.�= cor.ciij�i�n�a�! :_��� Cl��,c :�o�.�iu b4 cc� :sid.�;r� �
7. ; t}l� �'i�1�Z r�i,:�:'t o.� �11e uozi�.��; �i'or t�:a:; �.1�;a�
V�;�y -Gru�y you:i•,�,
r'`r r , ;
f L'�����f'/f/ �/'L'���'�--
v /� /
�.rt�7ux 4�. �7��a:�h�ren
�.Z`;".r:TPl
1 < .
NORRIS, BEGGS & SIMPSON
720 S.W.WASHINOTON STREET, POF.TLAND 97205•(B03)223-7181
May 12, 1983
�p°� � � f� �� � ��
t,.� ,'�� 1 t�� '
�1i;r'',: 1 ., I��'3
Mr. Bil1 Monalzan
Director of Planning � ClTY OF I�IGNkD
Development PtANNiNG DEf'T.
City of Tigard
P. 0. Box 23397
Tigard, Ox 97223
Deax Mr. Monahan:
On behalf of Farmers Tnsurance Group, owner of approxirnately 17 acres
of unde�treloped land located in the Tigard Txiangle, we would like to
poznt out the omission of a hotel use under the Commercial Pxofessional
zone. We a�ologize that we clid not notice its exclusion earlier and
hope that the f�.na1 zoning codes wi1.1 make provision in appropriate
locations fc�r such use. We would like to stress that we are currently
discussing our location with a national hotel group, thu� our belief in
the need and demancl for hote].s in the Tigard Triangle is real rather
than conceptual.
Referri.ng to City of Tigaxd Ordinance #78-9 which ou�li.ned neighbor-
haocl goals and policies to be considered for incorporation into the
comprehensive p1an, the ordinance states that there are 108 acres in
the Tigard Triangle potentially designated for Conunercial Professional
development and tha.t the intent would be to attract a sizable suburban
offic� park complex. Quoting fram Page 9, "The office park complex
wi11 rec�uire supporting land uses such as eating and convention
facilities. These ancillary uses should be located on an individua.l
permit request basis."
On Page 10, PoZicy 26, "Within the office park areas, supportive uses
such as eating, entertairament, motel ancl convention facilities are
conditional uses subject to the :finding of the Planning Commission
that compatibility with adjacent development is assured and there i.s
� a need within the office �axk area for the proZ�osed use."
With the in�provement of the 72nd Avenue interchange and the recent
start o£ constxuction of the improvement of the Haines Road overpass,
the potentia:l. for attracting a major hotel to the Tigard Triangle has
been vastly improved. The access fxom both Highway 217 and I-5, the
scope of surrounding office land, the absence of abutting residentially
zoned praperty and the hub location of tlze Triangle in suburban Portland
create an area that is ideal for stich a use.
PORTLAND � 9A�N�PRANCISCO • 8ANJ03E � BACRAMENTO • MONOLULU • TACpMA • LOS ANOELEi
Mr, Bi11 Monahan
May 1Z, 1983
Page 2
We ask that prior to final adaptation of the zoni.ng codes tha� wil_1 �
accompany the ne�a,;comprehensi.ve p1an, yo�x xeassess hotel use in the ``.
Crnmnercial Professional zone within the Tigard Triangle as a permittal�le �
�use. We also,.ask that suffici.ent flexib'ility be pxovided fox in design I
to a11ow a den.sity; that will permit constructian and operation of such
a facility to;��l�� econarn.ically feasible. Perh�.ps these issues could Ue
controlled by'the site, f�c�li.ty and design xeview process.
Farmers `Tnsurance Group has �had an excellent relationship with the
City af Tigard and a.re�proud�to be a part of your community. Our
iriterest in and commitment to the City of Tigard is �b�riously long term
and we wax�t to cooperate with' the Planning Department in every ppssible
way. If yo�a have any c{uestions that we can answer regardirig our request,
we '�aould look forward to meeting with you.
Sincerely, �
NORRTS, <BEGGS F� SIMPSON
J. . g
Vi e resident
�/Jm/20
cc: Mr. Graham K, Ritchie
Tlirector of Real EstatE, Tn�restments
Farmers Tnsurance Group '-
Dennis O�Neill
Norris, Feggs � Simpson
STA.FF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.3
TIGARD PLANNI�IG GOMMISSION
June 21, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNTOR HIGH SCHOOL
10865 5.�1. �l�lnut
TIGAR�}, QREGON
A. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
CASEt CPA 4-83 NPO �� 2 •
REQUEST: The applicant ie requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
from low density residential to medium lh?gh density
residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's analysis of applicable planning
policies an� existing land uses, staff reco�ends
that the Planning Commission recommend to the
. City Council approval og the proposed
Gomprehensive Plan Amendment from low density
residential to medium high density residential.
III APPLICANT; Jerry Cach OWNER: Jerry Cach
12525 SW �Iain St. Marshall & Joanne Sunnarborg
iTig�rd, Or. Jannette (Godwin) Wassenburg
LOCATION: 9240 SW Center St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lats
1200, 1201, 90000, 90001, 90002, 9Q003, 90004, 90005,
9Q006, 90007)
LOT AREA: 1.6 acres
PRESENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
PRESENT ZUNING DESIGNATION: R-7
IVPO COMMENT: NPO � 2 is in�ctive at this time.
PUBLIG NOTICES MAILED: 40 notices were mailed. No written comments
had been received at the writing of this
r�e po rt.
� 2. BACKGROUND
On May 9, 1983, by ordinance $3-24, the City Council adopted a low
denaity residential plan deaignation for. the s�bject site. The NPO #
2 Plan which was adopted by the City Council on February 24, 1975
deaignated the property as medium density.
i _ --
�
r • p
3. VICINITY INFORMATION '
The suxrounding land usea are as follows:
The property to the north anci weat is developed as single f�mily I
residential and is designated low density residential on the {
Comprehensive plan. The xailroad traeks and the Pacific Aighway
viaduct border the property on the south. Ttrere are some
professional affices across S.W. Center St. to the east of the site.
4. SITE INFORMATION
There are a total of 26 multi-family units on the property. Tttere
are 16 units in the apartment complex on SW Commercial and 8 �
condominium units in the complex facing Center St.. In addition,
there is a duplex on lot 1201.
B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POI.ICfiES
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
2,1.1 Ztre Gity shall maintain an on�oing citizen involvement program
and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opp�rtunity
I' . .
to be involved in all phases of the planning procesa.
All owners of. record within 25U feet were notified by c�ail of
this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times an
Jun� 9, 1983.
2.1.3 The City shall ensure that information on land use planning
issues is available in an understandable form for all interested
citizens.
All interested parties are given a minimum of ten daya to
comment on all land use applications and are encouraged to do
so. Staff ie available to answer any questions on appl.ications
or the application process.
12.1.1 The City shall provide for housing densities in accordanc� r�ith:
a. The applicable plan policies.
b. The applicable lcscational criteria.
c. Zhe applicable communi.ty development code provisions.
All applicable plan policies, locational criterias and Tigard
Municipal CodP provisiona have been considered in review of this
applic�tion.
The locational criteria to be considezed in determining a change to
medium high density are as followa:
Medium High and High Aenaity Residential
A. The following factora will be the determinants of the areas
deaignated for high density on the plan map:
�1) Areas whichi are not committed to low densifiy development.
STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 2
, _ , �.
(2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential
areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low
density residential areas.
(3) Areas which have direct access from major collector or
arterial streets.
�4) Aseas which a�e not subject to development limitations. '
C5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for
additi,onal development.
�6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit.
�7) Areas wa.thin one quarter mile from neighboxhood and general
commercial shopping centers or business and office centers.
. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open
space.
The property has already been developed to medium high density.
ltiere is s Tri-Met bus stop on Main Street, approximately two blocks
from the subj,ert site. In addition, the Main Street shopping
facilities are within two blocks of the property.
2. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard
� Municipal Code have be�n considered in review of this application.
C. CUNCLUSIONS
The proposed Compret►ex►sive Plan Am�ndment meets applicable planning
policies.
D. REGOMMENDAT'ION
Staff reeommends approval of the request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to medium high density, based on the following:
1• The property is already developed �o medium hi.gh density standsrds.
2. 1he proposal conforms to existing pLan policies and zoning code
requiremen�s.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
/ �
r
f
Eliza h A. Newton, sociate Planner iam A. Mon han, rector of
Planning and Development
STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 3
� _
eia��C� ��t[,. Pb .
� one. 639-4137
REAL ESTATE & BUIGDING SERVICE
12,°i29 S. W. Main Street Ju21e 1¢� 1g83 r;gdra, Oregoa �7223
Tigard. City Counc�.l
City of Tigard
P.o. Bax 23397 .
Tigard, Dre. g72'23
Re: Fi1e No. �PA-4-83
Attns Liz Newton
The above property in que�tion was, as you know, �oned Medium
Iiigh Denaity. It doee not make sense to zone property to
I,ow Deneity when doing so would bring an 18 unit, a 7 unit
and a duplex in�o �, nonconforming use.
Th� orv�ner's then wou�.d be faced w�th problems in obtaining
financing to rebuild in case of Sire ar other d�mage or �uat
to refinance.
The pra�erty in question is close to everything and makes
one of Tigard's better apartment �itee.
Sincerely,
CASH'S RLTY
� ,�`� / r .
� r, �
Gerald C. Cach
GCC:kg
� _ - _ LL__
� �''
.,.,
e(��� ;J �`¢(�. Phone: 63�-41�7
i
`� 1tEAL ESTATE & BUIGDING SERVICE
12529 S. W. Main Street juj�,y 18� 1983 T'iqard, Oregon 97223
4; � �
�� t'���'�e � �,��.�'� �
���� �� ��� �
��. � �
�
�
�
City of Tigardl ,
12755 SW Aeh •
�igard, Ore. 97223 'I
�
Re: Block where 9240 S.W. Center 3.$ lacated or NW � NE � Sec 2 T2S
R1W W.M. .ASA Bloek 64, No.rth Tigardville Tsx lots 1200, 1201,
I , ,� ,- __ : ,. ......_ , . ' d 2S1 2AB Tax lots 90000, 90001, ',
� 90002, 90003, �0004, 90005y 90006 & 90007
If the Bloclt ie not zoned back to A-12 as it waa only a shart ,
time ago, two proper�ies would f�.t into a noncomforming use. '
Plane for two moace units on another property would have to be ,
scrapped.
The property ie contiguous to a m�,�or arterial and abutts Main St.
and �ommercial. It 3.s next to a railroad �rack except for
Commercial St. '
The property should be zoned for 2Q units p�r �cre because af
above and its prozimity or walking dietance to shopping of al1 sorts. i
I am eure this is an error in tran�cription of msps. ,
Than]c you,
CASH'S RI,TY
�
� �
�
Gerald C. Cach
(�CC:k$
enc. (3) � � ��-� �� �_
i �`e�c/'� ��f �.�''i2-'1 �4Jr ���
� ��
�
���� ' .: �
`,� '�
��a ,>
� ��1C� ' �r , '
,.,1
1�G�`Kp
�`�,� N`NG pEp�.
p�p,N
�
` �� � �� ! .��:' �,,, r--N' ..... ;_.._1 L�. .; . 1 l� . . . I L .
••� i L. _.J
. i . '+� �� 1�` T';' i j '.� , , , �
�r . i � �� ��. �— ' ,�� . L!uN.r i ':, f N , � � . i ' � . . ��
� , �.=- - - , . � IV1 E�� ,� : ti � � ; �P��T_ � �¢.
( i � ` ' S �� , ,F '� . � � -
' . . ,,, .. � , - '_.�; j
` �,`=J`� � , � � �.�� .:t . ` ���-5 ,�\ �Fn �• � � .°�xE� ��—� ��_� = ,. ..� ��:
\� �� �.� .,,��"V � I � 't_,.�T' i
�L�� � � � T�� . I i_� , ��jr` L_. � N , _
RT" �
/ �.� �-T__ ��r� n• -•� e 1ro �� ... , ! ...7 I *
. . � �� . � i � ' % �
. -.1--L._� >r' ,� _ ' , j. . y`, �► .
� •
/, ..�_�� . � ._ .. , l._ _ ,- . �. � -
� i {". L.._ C � .�\ E._
'.\: ''►.• �I _' . ! i'_L"' k , �', `� -___� �_^ . _ ^ " �:
. � �c � ^� L • ' � � - — ,a ��—_r—� ' ^ w.
� �. . � ; � " ....._. '.. _ '��— � � -- � .
/ L - , - - ._ _ _ _ -- -
� . � '" < ., �.. 1
� Z - �
. �� � - _ C -P ,; .
� ��� ' �' � � _.! J .� ���,+''� �. .
jJ. �( . ' ' i-'-- av' h- � �\
-� - _.__._ � , -� . '� ; ._�
._ ,�-
--- ,...- .
... . i i_ � SM fµ � . . ��,.. . � .
'^�
I . --r�—. . � u .
'_ ._._�y __.. ,_r... . - _�._.._ ' . .O . '
_ � � � -
- � - - � �: � 1 t :. . � �y
a,..:�_ . �. � � �+ ,� � � a�.
�,,, � �`�� :,:� "! ' �; ' . ,�t�� ; � -`- ,;
,
� , � � �(�N ,_ . ` L l , _
d �'�- � ' � ` �) -�';�, �
� , /� �i-•` �•r� \� ' 35 �``Y � :
. �� . • � � �� ?. 1 � �..
•1� �.�
-+\a f`I , ..._- _ .
� \. �
�, ��` � ��, ! p�.'�, " � _ ;� � ...a
� � s � �. , � � �
i `` �'� '� �
` V ` , . • �'� ,�,\ i(� J �,� r ��_� . ,
� �'� S� , %`� . r, ' - `" � '
.� ,� � ,,,�i� �, �
� ,. ,. ;, � , � .` ' . � � _�__
�,,' .�:, � : ,� i / .
� \ •l � S. � � "� � �
��, �` ��<r +�� \ • \', +°� '+ \ L--,- � � ,`\
���y'/ .��`� ��'�M� �. / '� `` �� 4 , \`� �' / r ,
r'` '�� �• �� �`�`t� � � � \ \ ' ��,
�� 4� ;� � � � ' �'s�' '
r
,�`` \ \\. �h!
;� .v 1 `•v \\ .� , \ky _
�' � � � y,. � ,'.
�, ' � ��� � . � � • ���'h?r
� �� , � / ',L._ � � ` �, I�i
,,` �� . �,�► 5 // ,G L� '---- �. `� �- L :; �,�, . ',
, �. N� �_ ,i� ` D � ; � J,
�r
.,; ; �� .,. ' .,�,` , � \ %� 7J�.�:
1' .� . . �J . . . {' . ,.
� �y, � ^\ '' \ ..
� •�./ \ i� il � `
♦ ♦'�ef � . � , _. .. .
• � ' \/ —�..� �. � s�
� . { �. �, ,� � � ��.._,� _� ,, � 1\ �.�. r -
t�". ; "� ',,,L. .,�`. , ' :' 0 � �, `J \'�` '� i C�.�
, � ;'
� ..\ u"��o . � {-!� �'�- L� � ` � I -'� ^,'`,J`� _ L_.�
�; .�r ��> _ '" � w ♦ -,�; � ; . -
�� �, � ..;� __ ,�,�,_____ � � . _. . , �� �
,,� �. „ ., .:,,.__._,—, ,. - �..,,,,�. . j
c��y � ,�-r- ,=
, ���" , . � �� �.
� � �.,,��� �' ' , , , . - \ , , . . , , � ' � �� ' �' 1
� .� 1`' i ' � � � „ � ��� \ •, :,
�.'15 ' ',�,�,', � . T-1 �'-=----�.i.L.F�,�wor°_ -�I � , , \�
Iu 1 . ��, T-�--�-�_'_,._._-...__ • '"_�,�_� � , � �
.l ` t _
' �'�"�� � ' �l4`YI[w � � ..
\ y'�•��t` �. ' . .
' � 1 L, � , � . .
* � ' . � . , ' �µ I \�
/ t �� `� Y `.
. 1 ■
1l 1
•✓�� �r ' . � .
.
�I..
• �
_...... .aEquy .
1 r �7 .
.r-.--.----. . __ ----_._ � .
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.3
TIGARD PLARiNING �Q�MMISSION
JUNE 21, 19$3 - 7:30 P.M.
�OWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
10865 S.W. WALNUT, TIGARD, OREGON
A. FiNDINGS OF FACT
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Case: CPA 5-83 �Camprehensive Plan Amendment) NPO �6
Request: To change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to •
medium-high density.
Reco�endation; Based on staff's analysis and surrounding land
uses, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend ta the City Council approval of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment from low to
medium-high den�sity.
Applicants: Lucy Scheckla Leonard ScttecY�l�
10200 SW Durham Rd. 10100 SW Durham Rd.
Tigard, OR 9722.3 Tigard, OR 97223
Marie Collier (Breed) Larry & Nancy Bissett
P.O. Box 83 2004 NW Irving St.
Forest Grove, OR 97116 Portlandn OR 97209
Owners: s�me as above
Location: 10200 SW Durham, 10350 SW Durham, 16580 SW 108th and
Durham and the lot west of 16580 SW Durham (Wash. Co.
Tax Map 2S1 14B Tax Lots 500, 600, 601, 700 and 800)
Lot Area: 41.16 acres
Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Aensity Residential and
Open Space (see attached map)
NPd Comment: NPO #6 has not submitted any written comments on this I
application.
Public Notices Mail.ed: 90 notices were mailed. I3o written comments
had been receiv�d at the writing of this
report.
2. BACKGROUND
The subject propertie� were designated low density residential on the
Comprehensive Plan Map by Tigard City Council Ordinance 83-24 on May
9, 19$3. Staff, however, had recommended a medi.um-high densiky
designation. The NPO �6 Plan, adopted by Ordinance 78-27 on April
24, 1978, designated the property as low density.
� — _ _ — I
Staff Report
CPA 5-83
Page Z
3. VICINITY INFORMATION
The surrounding land us$s are as follows:
Durham Road borders the property on the north. Across Durham 1Road to
the north is the Summerfield development which is designated medium
on the Comprehensive Plan. The properCy to the west is devel��ped as
sin.�le family and is designated medium°high adjacent to Durham Road
snd low adjacent to the Tualatin River �see attached map). �fie •
Taia�latin River borders Che property on the south. The property to
the east is developed as single family residential and is designatsd
low density on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. SITE INFORMATION
There are existing single family homes and some out buildings on
three of the 5 lots. Tax lot 8D0 is vacant and woaded with
approximately lOX of the property in the 100-year flaodplain of the
Tualatin River. Yortions of Tax lots 500 & 700 are also in the
flood lain. The land slopes to the Tualatin River. The portion near
P
the river is heavily wooded. The northern portion of the land is
pasture land.
B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN IN'VOLVEMENT
PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN
OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING
PROCESS.
A11 owners of recard within 250 feet wese noti€ied by mail of this
�pplication. A notice was published in the Tigard Timea on June 9,
1953. In additi.on, NPO �6 was provided with an opportunity ta review
ths application. ,
2.1.3 THE CZTY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING
ISSUES TS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FARM FOR ALi.
INTERESTED CITIZENS.
All intereated parties are given a minimum of ten days to comment on
all land use applications and are encouraged to do so. Staff is •
available to an�wer any questions on applications or the appxoval
process.
3e5.3 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE Tt�E 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OF FANNO
CREEK, IT'S TRIBUTARIES, AND THE TUALATIN RIVER AS GREENWAY,
WHICH WILL BE THE BACKBONE OF THE OPEN-SNACE SYSTEM.
M
S:taf.f Report
CPA 5-83
Page 3
Portions of Tax Lots SOU, 700 and $00 are designated open space on
the Comprehensive Plan becsuse the land lies within the 100-�year
floodplain. Zhis application does not propose a ch�nge in the
designation for floodplain land desxgnated open space.
7.7.1 COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING SHALL BE COORDINATED WTTH
PRIVATE UTILITY AGENCIES TO ASSUAE THE AVAILABILITY OF
SERVICES WHEN NEEBED.
Private utilities such as gas, elecCricity �nd telephone se;rv�..ce can
be easily extended Co serve this site. Pxcks Landing an:d Summe,rfield
are currently served by private utilities.
12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FC1R HOUSING DENSITIES IN AGCORDANCE
W ITH:
a. rHE APPLICABLE PLAN FOLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LUCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE C01�4IUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
,All applicable plan policies, locaCional criteria and zoning code
provisions were considered an review of this application.
LoeaCional criberia fo-r medium k�igh and high denaity residential
designations are as fcallows:
Medium-High and High Density Resiciential
A. The follawing factors wi11 be th� deCermin:ants af the areas
designated for high density am the plan map:
(1) Areas which are nat committed to lo�v density develo�mento
(2) Areas which can be buffered from low dens�ty xe�idential '
areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low
density residential areas.
(3) Area� which have direct acce�a from a major collector or
arterial street.
(4) Areaa which are not subject to development limitations.
(5} Ar�eas where tt►e exiating fac:ilities have the capacity for
additional development. •
(6) Areas within one quaxter mile of publi� tranait.
(7) Areas within one quarter mile from n�ighborhood and general
comomercisl ehopping centers or business and office centers.
(8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open
apace.
�
�
�,
Staff Report
CPA 5-83
Page 4
The property undex consideration i� not committed to low density
development. 7:tie individual parcels are large enough to prnvide
adequate buffer frow adjoining single' family residential development
and etill develop at the medium-high density. Tax lots SOU, 600 �nd
601 have direet access onto Dusham Road. There are no developmen-t
limitations on the property. ltie floodplain area has been designated
open space and will remain open space. Facilities can be extended to
serve medium-high density development on the site. Zhere is a Tri
Met bus stop at 98th and SW Du'rham approximately 3 blocks from the -
site. Zhere is a commercial center at Pacifi¢ Highway and 99W.
2e TIGARU MUNICIPAL CODE
Comprehensive P1an Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard
Municipal Code will be applied to the developm�n� of the site during
Site Deaign Review. Included in the Design Review are parking,
landscape, access and street improvements.
C. CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets appl�cable pl�nning
policies., The development of the site will be reviewed and approved
thsough SiY.e Design Review.
D. RECO�IMENDATION
Staff recommends apgroval of the appl.icants' reqrsest for a Comprehensive
Plan �nendment based on the following:
1. 2he proposal meets the lacational criteria for cietermining areas of
medium-high density residential..
2. The proposal meets applicable adopted Gomprehensive Plan policies.
3. �here is land designated medium tiigh denaity immedi�tely west af the
szte which is �imilar in character to the subject property.
r ,
„ �
i
� :``YY�... '-«G��'8_5�
Prepared by: Approved by• i
Eliz eth Ann Newt liam A, Monahan
Associate Planner Directo:r of Planning
and Developmen�
pm
(0051P)
� •
t�� '
. �
� r� ■� .
� . ��.�`���e I�..° �
n...,�.,.,,,�1� � ��°
��������� ��� � �
.-,� �� � !�'P:�'+ �
��� _ -/�' - �!�
.
r � p � 1
� I ��
f ��
... ' ��1��'' I. � �
� ' � ,
I_ �
1
'r _ . t
' 'r -4--�. . . `�'
�
•
• •
•
• . � .�ii .Y �...■� ■' • • �• � •
• .
�• • . � � ' =l�' ��:. .•- .
' • � � �����0� y � Itll� 'iu
, .
, _ �
� . f i �i s� � �� � �••`:"�
` Y �,...�• .sf��T,U� � ��I
� �.���,.���ag��
• ' ' M '1t�a�' `'�!11
:�;� r ' � � ''��� ��
`` � ���•� �►��1��� �qM� ►:=-�- �d
•��3 /� u� t IM J
� � `��?'• ��,�`\�,�1��� p�,9 ` `� `L �
� !9\��1 � e s .
r r Ac� 0``�!��11�'�1 ,�,y1� i� ��\�
��'?` .� N��1�,� ` e`� r! '�!:
� • � ��"� d��
,�'�����• .ranhrz-�� ,�� �,��� , ��,� •
�
♦ � 1 .. � � � ,
�A. � v .,' _
� �� ; .. � . d�..,� ,,a
,
�� �, _��.�,� iti i��11[l��M���'�f��ra11 ��--- Q^ - -
- .� •.y �.p �a - ..
�.�A
�e� 1 �� E 111��:
►G�IJC�i �a�.� � ��1;�• " ��
� _ � � �
■ `
�
.�.' u :' � � ,�
r �� �'i�'�n � .
r � ' •�`v '\�,,I►[� �r
► • ♦ ■�
�w�,,�'��� �� �
� �u�� ,, ����', -
— ��riiy� �
r
V �I L� .
r �
(� ' �' � • �
�
/
��' f�:,
�
� �'���
L ����' ,j '( `��'1''`''
1� :� , '• ,� . i� �
�
JUN y1983 �arry A, sissett
2004 NW Irving St.
CI�IY UF TIGNKLI Portland, oR 97209
PLANNiNG DEPTo June 8, 1983
Mr. Willi.am A. Monahan
Directox of Planning and Develapment
�igard City Hall / �
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. M�._,ahan,
Herewith enclosed is our application for amendment of the
Tigard Comprehensive Plan. We, along with several other
property owners, were allowed by the City Council, to apply
without fee, in order to a3,low further consideration of the
future resadential densities to be provided for in our a..�a.
Altogether, this area includes Tax Lots 500 (SGheckla) , 600,
601 (Breed) , 700 (Scheckla) and 800 (Bissettj , as shown or� th�
attached copy of a portion of the tax map for the nor�.hw�st 1/4
of Section 14, T2S-R1W, W.M. Tt contains over 40 acres and is
bounded on ttie north by Durham Road; on the west by the west
line of Secta.on 14, on the south by the Tualatin River, and on
the east by the Housing Development known as '°Pick° s Landing'° .
This area is served by sewers which are stubbed off at Pick ' s
Landing and also by the trunk sewer recently brought north of
the Tualatin River '
�ust west of 108th. (We have access to
108th b wa of a 40-fao
t ri t
Y va e road o
Y ver whi
P , ch we have an
easement for road and util.ity purposes including sewers.) The
area is also well served by public transportation and main
arterial streets. Durham Road intersects Pacific Highway (99W)
approximately 1/2 mile fram the area, and extends east to I
connect with I-5. Bus service is available at the inters�ction I
of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. As the L�urhaan Road c�r�idor '
develops into one of Tigard's principal resic�ential areas� i
public transit will undoubtedly be routed ovE�r its entire '
length.
The area is close to both primary and secondary schools.
Shopping is readily available at both the King City and �
Summerfield commercial districts. These districts inc].ude
food markets and other retail shops, as well as a full range of
financial and professional services including medical and
dental c�re.
1 --- ---- _
. _ �:. � <
Mr. William A. Monahan
June 8, 1983
Page Two
The five tiax lots, for which reconsideration af development
densities is being xequested, are almost totally devoid of
pre-existing development. These ar� large tracts which offPr
the opportunity, especi�ily if developed together, of providing
a unique residential environment. A planned unit developmer�t
utilizing direct access to the Tualatin River as a common
recieation area could become one of Tigard's truly outstanding �
residential ar�as.
For such a prospec;t to become a re�lity, the low density
c�.assification whfch has been given to this area, must be
changed to medium high density or at least medium density. The
eaonomic realities are that it is no lonqer possible to pr�vide
, the amenities which we envision in the context of a large lot
development. Large lots are no longer as desirable as the�y
once w�re. People are more willing to share the outdoors in
common with their neighbors, e.g. King Ca.ty, Summerfield,
Charbonneau to name just a few examples. These develo m
h p ents
a
ve bee
n responsive to the needs of an increasingly larger
segment of the population and they have shown that high density
development does not mean �.ow quality. Quite the reverse. as
large lot developznents, these projects coul.d not have supported
the extraordina.ry �ommon amenities which they now provic�e. And
the same thing is true for the larger cammunity. It has been
well documented that the cost per household of urban services
rises rapidly as density decreases. These principles are also
recognized in the Tiga�d Deve].a�ament Plan.
Among the fin�3ings in the Housing Section of �he Comprehensive
klan i.s the s�a�.ement:
��The rapic� increase in housing and land cost over
�he l.�st several years has excluded many house-
holds from obtaining suikable housing to meet
their needs. "
One of the "implementation strategies" designed to reduce
housing costs, states:
"The Ciky shal]. seek ways to minimi�e the cost af
housing by encauraging a var.iety of home
nwnership alternatives, such as, but nat limited
to, townhouses and candominiums. °'
f
;
I
. .. . � � .. .. � . . . . � . . . . . . �� : .. .. �i
" . � . . . � . � � . . . . . � � � . . � � i
. . . . . . . . � . . . .. . . . � i
�.. . . .. . :/(:.. . . . �' . . . . . . .
�
Mr . William A. Monahan ;
June 8, 1983
Page Three
i
One of the principle policies of the public transportation �
section of the �omprehensive Plan is that:
"That City shall encoura:ge the expansion and use
of public transit by locati.ng land intensive uses I,
in close proximity to transitways. " �
And this is further restated as an implementing strategy:
"'The City shall propase land use d�nsities, within the
Comprehensive Plan, along transit oriented corridors that
supp:ort public transportation servic�. "
A basic poiicy of ttie Comprehensive P�.an is that the housing
de�isities shall be provided in accordance with- applicable
Locational Criteria. The residential Loca�.ic�nal Criteria
enumerated in the Comgrehensive Plan specifica�ly grovides that
Jaw density residential shoald be restricted to,
"Areas which are committed to low dekasity
development and not shown un tk�e °Buil.dable
Land Inventory' as vacan� ldnd. °'
The area in question is vacant and listed on the Buildable Land
Inventory. Accarding tc� the Compretaensive Plan Loca�.ianal
�riteria, this area should not be desig�nated for low density
developmenti. xt m�ets or exceeds a11 of the Loeational Criteria
for medium density residentfa�. and nearly all of the Criteria
for meda.um k�igh and high density residenti�l. 'I'i
�
Ver tr Y Y S
,
'�
Larry A. Bissett
LAB/�m
cc: Marie Br�ed
Leonaxd Scheck3.a
Steve �'anik '
�
�
�
� � P.O. Box 83
Forest Grove, OR. 97116
June 6, 1983
Planning Departffient
City of Tigard
1Z755 SW A�h, P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Gentlemen:
I am respectfully requesting that the recent zone change to Zow Den-
sity on my property (tax lots 600 & �Ol, 251-14B, WM, Washington County)
be reversed to Medium High Density as previously designated.
I am particularly opposed to having Medium High Density on a 5 acre
parcel �mmediately on my We:st b�rder with not even a street or trees
separat�n:g the two parcels. It would be hard to justify low density
expensive bts bordering this 5 acre parcel as well as Durham Road.
It is my feeling that we need to use what little remairiirig land in
Tigard as effectively as possible. The Satler property, Tax lot 36,
Sec. 15, immediately on my West, my parcels, Tax lot� 600 and 601,
Sec. 14, and the Scheckla parcel, tax lot 500, Sec. 14, immediately
r�n. my �East, a•re contiguous parcels and are af the eame character, at
lea�t for the firet 700 ar 800 feet back. This plot of land would
be a natuxal designation far hi�her density use. We desperately
need affordable housing in the Tigard area and 10,000 sq. ft. lots
would not be affox�dabl� housing �or �he ma�orit,y. There is a 25'
to 30' barrier plla.s treee between the P3.cks L�.nding parcel and the
Schleckla parcel and this makes �, natur�.l break between law density
and iiiedium high density zonin.g.
The people of Picks Zanding are maintaining th�.t to put higher den-
sity ne�t ta them would lessen thei�r investmen.t. Ny propzrty has
been in my �amily since around 1915 and I have owned it personally
for 23 years. I have a much larger inves�ment in time, work, and
manetarily than �ny of' the individu.als in Picks Landing. I reali�e
this is not a fact�r but this property ia my sole source of income �I
for my old age -- which is hereo- an.d T personally need to have th�e
property sold for its highest and best uae. Zow density housing on
mY parcels with medium high density bordPring me with no break on
the We.st and Medium density (A-12) directly across Durham Road from
my land would not be the highest and best use, much le�s the most
desirable use.
The peo�le of Picks I,anding are opposed to a chan�e in the atmosphere
of the country side around thanand like t;o aee open fields an� tall
trees. The trees in the back on my praperty v�ilZ ha�ve ta come down
irregardless o� the density al.lowed because they ase over-ripe and
their roots are shallow. They would constitute an extreme danger if
any were allowed to remaan. I had hoped to kPep some trees but have
been aav�sea agains�t it. We aIl have to acaept chan�e. The people
knew when th.ey moved to Picks �andin.g that i.t was just a matter of
time until this tnnk pl�.ce.
r
�
. Planning Dept. page 2 June 6, 1983
I eincerely feel that I have been put in the "middle" and have b�en
arbitrarily deeignated as the '*bre�ak�� between Picks �,andin� and Nled-
ium high density, I eertainly feel that this 3:s not onl.,y an ilingi-
cal break but aleo that it is extremely unfa�r to me. I would rp�-
apectfully re�,�es:t that if you feel you cannot change my parcel {at ;�
least the frant h�,1�') bae� to mediu,m high density then' certainly the �
; low deneit� desi�nation should be exter�ded through the Satler parce�,
T�x lot 36, sec. 15, immediately on my W,.e:.st, to 108th,
. �
I w�u1c� lik� to add that I wa�s not �,t the original' p�.annin� commission
meetin�� becau�e I w�.s com�l.efelp unawar� they were taking place, I
li�re in Gale� �Creek gnd do not' get the p�►pera in which the notices
were said to have been ,placed. I moved from my Ti.gard home only be-
cause I knew I had no recourse bu� �o e�ll �his <p�operty I have a1-
waye loved in ar�der to liv�. I h�ve been tax�d off of the l.and,
The county arbitr�rily �,1ac�d a �$25,OC�Q per' acre �ssessment on my
land eve�. though I ci� nat h�av� a. �ewer available to `my property.
I would apprecir�te aia.y consideration you can give me. Thank you.
You �-^�' y
,� "���� �f
-et"_,a-�.
Marie reed (formerly Collier)
� -= ----- - _ _
10155 S�� Jergens Lane
Sherwood, 0regon
June 21 , 1983
� � � l
Tigard Planning Commission
12755 SW Ashe Avenue
Tigav�d , Oregon 97223
RE; Fi le No. CP�15R83
Scheckla Zoning Change
Dear Tigard Planning Gommission :
This letter is in response to your Notice of Public
Nearing regarding the above matter. My husband and I reside at
10155 SW Jergens Lane , Sherwood , Oregon . This is on the Tualatin
River and is directly across from the property in question . This
letter represents not only my husband ' s and my feelings , but the
feelings of our neighbors : Mr. & M.rs . Rich Frost , Catherine Rife ,
and Mr. & Mrs . John Bohlan . We are all residents on Jergens Lane
across from the proper�,y described above .
We oppose the request to change the comprehensive plan
designation from low to medium-high density.
The basis of Mr. � Mrs . Scheckla ' s request relies upon
the fact that medium-to-high density designation exists •to the
west of their property and in close proximity to Nighway 991,1, and
that �the undeveloped site provides an opportunity for a unique
residential developme�nt.
The Scheckla property is not on Hwy. 996� and does not
have the same character as the other properties designated as
medium-high density. The Scheckla property is rura7 in nature
and is bordered by low density housing . The character of the
surrounding neighborhood is low density housing or less . One must
consider the surrounding neighborhood as that property to the east
and west �f the site and the property to the south of the site .
The south encompasses rur�al preperty with less than one residence
per 3 acres . We believe it i� short-sighted of any applicant or
planning commission to consid�r the property solely as having
ea�t an.d west neighbors . A total view of this property must be
taken .
We agree that an undeveloped tract of land of o�er forty
acres presents an opportunity for a unique residential development .
Pick " s Landing is a unique r�sidential development and makes good
use of riverfront properties . It is also a low density develop-
ment. The Schecklas fail to realize that there are unique resi -
. . . . . . � ... , . . . � . .. .. !
Tigard Planning Commission
June 21 , 1983
Page Two
dential deYelopments other than mediu;m-high dsnsity and non-owner
oc`cupied re'sidences .
The City of Tigard � s faced with a unique environmental
resource : th.e Tualatin River. The Tualatin River has retained ` °;
a :�ural an� pastoral character throughout numerous development
projects . A great violation would occur if the City of Tigard
would permit a multi-family medium-high density development of
non-owner occupied res�dences . This would �iolate the conce�t of ;
the comprehensive use plan arod the c�aracter of a unique neighbor- '
hood. i
The greatest error that the zone change applicants and j
the planning commiss� on have made is to relate this site to prop- ;
erties north of Durti'am Ruad w'hich are of inedium-high density `{
design:atiorr. This s<ite is more pro�erly `related to the properties ?
south and east, which are of rural and low density designation. ';
Sincerely,
�,.�.C%.��.�.. �t.t�-
Debbie F. Craig�
DF£/s j h
i
.�
r . : , ;
i� � . ._' il!'�I� 1 •�,
� � . �� �
1? � ;i' . , , i l.:�: i j,�
��� ,� ��
���� .��.. . ;� . ;; . ii.�`
�;� i Y ��- i i c�;i�i�u
J.uly 1, 1983 PL/�NNING C�EPT.
Tigard City f;ouncil
12755 S . GJ. Ash
Ti�ard, Oregon
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
As a Pi'ck ' s Landi'ng homeowner and citizen of Tigard , I have
had si`ncere i.nteres.t i'n achieving an equitable solution to the re-
zoning of property due �Jes.t of my home(,.16375 S„ W. Sylvan Ct . ) .
I am pleased to see that a common accord appears to have been
struck between Pick ' s Landi'ng Homeowners and the PropPrty Owners
of the contested property . That is , that it will be zoned Medium
Dens%ty�(_RUD) wi'tfi allowance for a ' buffer zone' between Pick ' s
Landi'ng boundary li`ne and any future property development . As
you may� already reali'ze, many hours of de6ate have been spent by
both sideS to arri'vP at this consensus . What is most important;
now i's that we mPnd our di:fferences and live as good neighbors .
Wfii'le I ' d 6e the fi'r-st one to vote that we put this case to
rest, ther-e i's one more uncertai:nty � wi'sh to express to the Ci ty
Councll . As. I unde�stand i't, legal counsel has advised that no
formal wor�i;ng be put on record as. to what ' �uffer zone ' next to
Pick ' s Landi'ng speci'�Pi'ca11y means. . The potential problem I see
i.s that 6y the ti:me the land is actually developed , fe�v wil. l re-
member the ver6al i:nterpretdtion of this zone-- as it has been
descri'bed to me and m�• nel�hbors in previ'ous meetings . Even with
Medi'um Densi:ty zoni:ng , there i � s.till a possi'bi'lity that a duplex
4r common wal l ��vel l i'ng wi:l l 6E erected next to the Pick ' s I_andi ng
property 1 i:ne.
T wi's.h to 6ri;efly s•tate wh.y a duplex or cpmmori wall struc-
ture i�s of cqncer-n , The. re�sons are pure'ly economic . While I
hope ;o reside i�n my pres.ent h.ome for many years to come , I may
, at s�me ti;me be forced to sell . Si.nce my 6ackyard has no natur-
, al 6arri�er� a dup1ex would stand out like a sore thum6 and nega-
tively i�mpact the value of my home. �
There,fore , I reques.t that the Ci.ty Council state that a 100
fapt �uffer zone next to Pick ' s Landing be single unit, detached
fami;ly dwellings . Thi:s would be si;ncerely appreciated �y those
o� us who haye i'nyes.ted our sayi:ngs. in city property that we trust
wi.'l l 6e fdi'rly zoned and buffered by the Ci:ty Counci 1 .
R�pectfu �y yours ,
�
I�r� -e � � �..�.�.�.-
Rqbe�rt Worsl ey �
June 14, 1983
Tigard �lanning Commission
File Number CPA 5-83
This letter is in response to the request filed by Lucy and Leanard
Scheckla "et al" to change the density of SW 108th and SW Durham Road
from low to medium high density.
We were transferr�d to Tigard by my employer, This was my final move
since I will shortly be retiring. It was with much excitement and
due consideration we had when Sam Gatter Realtors helped us in selecting
the just perfect location among those availab�e in the area.
The highest consideration for ou-r property selection was never again ta
be confined to the "shoulder to shoulder" living of anuthern California;
with the shouting, arguing, loud radios, loud cars, all night parties.
We bought in Pick� s Landing, adjacent to the Scheckla property, being
assured that it was to be developed in the same manner and density as
Pick�s. I have a State Vet loan - the only way I could afford the
property - and have no further access to another loan, having been
moved twice before by my employer.
Pick's Landing is a lovely, spacious, quiet neighborhood with natural
trees� birds, etc. , ideal for raising a family, relaxing after a
stressful day at the office.
The Schecklas now want to destroy this serenity by requesting a density
from low to medium high. This is the thi�d or fourth time we of Pick� s
Landing have had to defend the original zoning of the property. The
NPO at the previous hearing has provided sufficient evidence of other
properties more acceptable to the higher density.
Schecklas had the opportunity to request a change long before Pick� s
was developed, which would have given us homeowners a choice, i.e. of
not putting our life savings into a house n�xt to property that would be
�eveloped into non-�wner occuppied dwellings. As it is we have no
choice, we bought and invested in goad fait� that the Pianning Commission
was honest and sincere in perm�nently establishin� the zoning as it
was when we bought our house. i
It is granted that every issue has two sides. The Schecklas c�ncern
is over money, which soon will be dissipated. Our concern is of
liveability, one of perpetual duration. '
Please vote to keep the existing low density on the property or a
400� buffer of low density housing. ,
Yo rs truly, .. �
� `��{���� �' �^"N �
Lauren W. Ric ma�; �' �" .� •, � '�, �; ,1V��) ,
16380 SW Sylvan Ct. � I 1
Tigard, Or. 97223 �' JUN 1 7 l;j�?3 1_
�I I Y UF i i�HKa
PLANNING DEPT.
` ----
_
tewis ft Clar� Coli'�ge
�une 20� 1983
To: (`1embers of the Tic�ard Planning Commission
frome Dan and Gheryl Duke
Re: Zaning of L�nd Adjacent to Fick's Landiny (File ;'GPA 5-33)
We are concerned that the land adj�cent to Pick's Landing (on the western
side of the development) may be re—zonedf
We decided to settle in Pick's �:.anding because we understond that it
would not become crowded. We desired a place where our four chi.ldren
could experienc� a semi-rural existence, free of heavy tr3ffic and general
congestion. H�d we known there was any possibility of the l�;nd bordering
our proper�y (16355 SW Sylvan Ct.) being zoned medium � high density, we
would have located elsewhere.
We recognize the validity of economic concesns as expressed by those
with a stake i� the property to the west of us. eut we �lso feel there
are otfier considerations besides economic gain. A great many families
stand to be adversely affected by a change in the zoning pattern.
W� would hoPe that the pastoral nature of our neighborhood could be
m�intained by maintai�ing the zoning as low .�� density. In
addition, we hope that the Tigard Planning Commission represen�s the
interests of families and owners of single—unit dwellings as well as
the interests of large ].andowners and developers.
Respectfully submit�ed,
�
` I � �` �� �l� .. � �\... J ��._`.v 1,, ' .�� �� 'a�.i��.�( L�,�, �.
�•
ke
D�niel L. Duk� Cheryl D. �u
1b355 SW Sylvan Ct.
Tigard, OR 97223
Educalional Adminisiralion Progtam _.___ ._
f'nrl�an�l, Orer�nn h121�J.^...�____
lclephone' `,(l3 7�� Ii1G1
� (
� __ `._.__ ,
, . _
_ o L)iJRNAM �� _.. �+ ����__�_ M _ _
__r.�. - - . — --`-- -- - a .
t. , _ --� e, �
` ITQO e��—`_ ' � ��-r----- — — �--- -- RQ,aU .__ -- 2• te ar �s ��... .__
5" •r.r 1�� . I p 0 ry� —� " •.e• j� ----------
Y �6C�0 s•l.. � cat},�•14�,, ii •.o'
_ . !!
_ � : �N4� � ��! �s . �i 504. � .
y � .. 6 p0
. �� . R . . . - f . rii�k �a rs ss„ � . . .
TJ i4 r
L � zs � 23-74 � _ ��, �6 � � � l
3'L ' t� �26� G �~ �
-� �G �' �
�, �4i �A .. �� 'r .�f��ar—_ . ..' . j � �. ; . .
��^' �tf � ! ' � �5D( j� t e:<.-�... �h ;� b tl
�,f�£f^y i� � � � ! � wc.� .r�.� , j p�j � • ; ` . . � .
;5�.7 x i �,. . ���' . F `• �' . _ . . � .�. . i� ��� � g�� ' . ' � ..
�S �` E o� I800 `� iw-:n �.•n - •�.cs yr� p ) , f
�. , F
,�.,,4 _ � `� '�� . J lfir � �J i'�.y� � IcCT� +t4 ... � �� .1�7 � . �"'� 1 . � }•� . .
� t —' --- !
�� •�• �. �'���� . ' ' ��� f L �� .. . .
� � 1,�O� 220ic , . .i i . � � . . �
ta.4 i 201 � �
� e ,,,.� � � ;,I` �L_ `I -,
�' - 2s ' � 2�7 "� _�, 3S n,•�'` .l 1 i •V
r.• � :� r ..
� , j � � ��
IKKw? '�—�— ^,
� �Y��'• . r�1 —�--�-_ ��s •! �Ci' . .
� , , — rsar - za2 �� _� .
{OI ,mt + tnnri •it�e r. 'f i1 �� i
� , �.... ., • — "`' -'" � ,..„_ ,� . r,.� „�� � `
i�� —. _
= t �ij't �.,.� '?.°,°.� � 300 ��.
i ��y 'tsl � ��, !�, � �1 r') t' � r��.� "`' . Z ,
� , �,.t �" . .., Il� � T� .) :J 1� � �- : ;�
1 , � a�-- '�
`` �°` i
al`�`',�"i 4. R: 1 ' t �_ . _ - - � ' �
r ^t . _� ` �f :ci�.sa"'. -i' - , •'�w 2f) �
M� ' - �, 7�s.e' � ° ' ,, � 34 �,
1� :x� ='.``�e� f� 5aecs'roa7p• �' ; �� a - .� . . ' � (= J , . .�.
� f .:�� � �3_�� : _j�
� � t � � �� -� ; .
'i�5"c�-�+� +. `I.�ii�--a•.-.- •' � � � ;.=
� A r . r s r�,��� � _ _ _iV7�____- -!!±-_-r._. _ '"'---'�T-.— i�
� ���N- '� �.
�� C, �.��_ �r�aa ' Z�,� �,3 ZI00 � itoi.w. a0i; ��G;�.Q °
�� ' 2702 { E� -. Y �w. ;2 , r -
I '� �- �"��•� ��. i.�
� -r� � x � :�a� !
���- `� =s�:� �� e�g �a.a� ��_._.. �
I �� � � � ._� , -__ _ . . _ _ _ __ y��.- �.
� ` � �� �( ��ou , , ' + �
y� �r �:.=�K 22 . •F.r 2•`� �t02 ' ,S .
i¢ t - sa� � •�•� -
TiY -»�T` �� ... ��d�5;,;: �'r'aa.�.�� � �.i� $ r _�� • � .. . . .
� (f She n�9�1 S�v� "�
�,! 7 � � t:a �_ i � �� �..�._�
� . _
, �F-. `
C.w� : h - �nti ��i �`-r,w.....,...� ,._.r.�. . ....�A!!_.��,..J3!.,..��_...... a � ...�°a' w�•� _ . - i•Nw'��,e� . ���
; �ei
�'" A.� ; � Y 000� ) u" -_"a�'�','_--�-. ��^�,,,,,.�-.w ,�•.'�'�-� i' .� i . . . � '
*,� ; � s � .U,� � � _._ ^ � �eoe 1 ]oo
� • �
� ; d j o� ., E z � � „�... ..,.._
c� } � r� � f-) ,r �s,.r fi�. 6Qp �.
^ t � . r •�r'� IS �Y; ^� .d .� �atr �Nic3. ` �'�e%1��C�t' I
� •.�
� u
� ' 1401 ��f� ��re 3� . + � �- -
�� �- R � ` r s�a.��` i.�o�.. ! ,,� 1 ¢ ''„
�� *:su� ,., „ti .�.�.�, • :;�;s«.h!!s� � 1 ! � s '�' ` I,
�� .
� � :s�r. �� � Z�}` , '{- r'�!.�:,�ty- - +w�s�•• ( s•. � �
f< -� " [iv�i - . .Q! � io.R��'- b - �i . e . . �.; .
? { � ' . �`:� � `y 7Y'6f � . . a . # . .. .
, : � *,, r= a�
� .,. �,.�.. ,
,
x :
�.
. , . . . i.. . .
a
..
t x ' .
.
��..
�_i'p
1
.
" 9Q1 s
_ __ •
-�� ..
�: .
__._ .
•"
�. r�.. ,� i �' , . ��o . . i. .
- �7►)'� t �: . . -L . � .
ir . . - . . . . . . . . .
�t
�
�Q - I
.
. z
_ �,u� � �2400 .. t,� ..�1�= :� „3 --•- �
,��r '
, _ �� 2� .'s —. .��. � . Q v,
'� ± � � - '°� ;, soo �eoo�, '1= '—`• TUALAT/IK
: � /� ,� — r:
..,.,,. '��-.,, �
x � ,.,.„ :, ��.. oH-. � � � �,.. ,a..,� :-t. '� ,
w "X`� a; # 2JO:r : r `'� j «: � v �si IOOtb: ItQO :=r��17�t�30.O,F.��
� cisr w' i i � ers�a: •�s�, *yic�,�?a
}� ,`� 2300 ---' 9lt0 , +- � �,.- �r� � ''
E � � �� 1!4 . � �� �ae��l. � .�. [ � � � '�` �il� .
��a � - � • . : _j t `
,. .t� � � ,o��" . . � �� .
� y� � Z��+ .�� � ' �� � , � � � . • � ^��� . � '��s r � . ..
x .� :. t Et . �'S' � f � • ..,i.;: �a.• - � . I
� r^ �1Y .S . . . . . � ' . '� �Y�i} .
I �`Z ��'�i . � �� ��� ... .�..- � . . � —' __�'S�Yi" Y . .. �
.�. _ �� �..�sw.�=.m
��.�*�'�T'�C'��xP� 1 1. . .. _. _ _ � ....p " '���"�
1
H011flE BUILD�RS 11�SSOCIATIUN OF 11AETROPOLITAN PORTLAPID
. . . ti.>'JrJ.� J.VY. RP`lti}�AT R�JN4V� 'r•JVlfi_ wlVl� � . . . . ..r..y `e'�ave . y ` .. . .. . .
�..��� ��v���o, t�s���a�€ ��ra���o��s��-�$so � . ;.;� . _
��_��� �. ,,�, \
1'HE HOUSING CENTER '� �' "' ,
� J�!�I 1 " 198:3
�ITY vF 'f IGHKD
PLANNING DEPT.
, . �
June 15, 1983 j
Mr. k'rank Tepe�ino, President {
Ti,gard Planning Commission '
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mr. Tepedino;
This is to 'notify the Planning� :Commission that the
Home Builders Association 'will not testify on the draft
community development code at the June 21 publie hearing.
The code has just been released and we received our copy
today, June 15. That does not leave enough time for me
or ou.r interested members to review the document and to
reach consensus on changes before the first hearing.
We c�efinitely intend to testify at the July 12 hearing.
By that time, r�ve should also have been able to meet with
city staf� to reach tentative agreement on as many of our
concerns as possible. We are delaying our testimony until
Ju1y 12 so that our time and the Commission's is used mos�
ef�iciently.
Sincerely,
.
��u/Nti�
KeVin L. anwa
�
Staff Attorney
cc: Wa.11i,am Monahan
Mayor Wilbur Bishop
Gary Reid
;;
` ��
. . . � . � . � . .. ... . . . / � � � . .
T0: 7IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i
+
RE: JOHN SMETS NP'0 APPLICATION
Dear members of the Planning Cor�nission:
On May 25th, 19�3 the N2ighborhaod Planning Organizatian (NP0) #5 held
its monthly meeting at Tigard City Hall: As one of the issues dealt with under
"other business," the members discussed Mr. Smets' application for re-appoint-
ment to NPO#5. Subsequent to that discussion, a motion was made, which passed
unanimously, to make a formal recommendation to the Planning Corr�nission that
.
Mr. Smets not be re-appeinted as a member of NP0#5.
.
It wa►s the consensus of the group that..b,ased upon Mr. �me�s' attitude and
behavior as expressed in his previous cont�ct with the organization, that his
r•e-appointment would not be in the best interests af the city and would adversely
affect the functioning of what has otherwise been an effective committe�.
During those meetings Mr. Smets attpnded h�:
- Refused to recognize the elected chairperson and der�anded that he be
recognized as �he chairperson.
- Refused to let tfie issue be resolved by a vote of the members.
. ( . . . . .. . . . . . . .. � . . . ..
- Disrupted the meeting to such a� extent that no other business could
be condur,ted and r,esulted in the meeting being adjourned.
- Was rude and insulting to other NP0 members, prior members and the
staff consultant, Jeremy Corsoufile.
- Expressed resistance to any ideas being discussed to change the exist-
ing p1an.
- Arg�ed that the existing organization had no rigfit to modify the plan
adopted by the priar committee.
- Expressed an extreme bias against the attitudes �nd interests of res-
idential property owners in favor of the ecomomic inter�ests of
business and developers.
Discussions we have had with two af the 'previous NPO members indicated that his
behavior in our meetings was not unique, but was characteristic of Mr. Smets'
attitude during the life of the prior NFO committee.
Although we normally would welcome the participat�ion of a member of the pro-
fessional business comm�nity, we feel there are nthers wh� would be m�ore
representative of their i'nterests and conduciv� to a good working relationship �'
with the r�sidentaal interests of the NPO.
,
,
For these reasons we respectively req�e�t that Mr. Smets application for re-
appointmer�t be denied'. •
'ti
Very truly yours, ';
NPO#5 Members
��
/� �9��
��.� r��� �
�
�. �
.� '� , �-
,
�
� �,.��.---...� ---__
0
� S
l
j �. � . . . � . � . � � � . . � . � . . . � . � .
�.
15970 SW 76th Ave. ,
Tigard, fJR 97223 '
November 16, 1982
Mr. Wilbur Bishopa Mayor
City of Tigard
12755 SW Ash St. , `.
Tigard, OR 9T223
Dear Wilbur,
I am r�turning the citiz:�n participation questionnaire, not because I believe
_ that Tigard is above the' need for citizen involvement but because I beiie°ve
that Tigard as every other community in Oregon needs the dedicated invoJvement
of all of its citizens in harmony with all of its other citizens.
._..
I met with the people wha are currently legitimately seated or� NP0#5. I find
them courteous and coneerned �°bout the livabi1it of our comnunit and
to sa
the least ciedicated to doing a good job. Unfortunately Wilbur you m�d�e the y '
additional appointments or reappointmen�s of two people who get along like two
bull elephants, John Smets and me. During tfie one meeting that I attended,
there was a prepar�d agenda and the members met and wPre prepared to conduct
� business. Smets' insistence on the continuation of his chairmanship was as �
4.
crude a demon
stration of e o as I have ever witnessed and I became infuriated.
9
Nothing substantive transpired after that momemt.
That committ�e is a heal�hy functioning entity as it is present1y populated and
I do not believe that the addition of John Smets ar myself to the cor►�nfttee wi11
improve upon it.
So Wilbur, whiie I do not want to serve on the NPO, I am sure that you know that I I
have the best interest of Tigard at heart and would be deliqhted to serve any �
special assignment you might make, where there would not be a long-term
committment.
Cordially,
CC; NP0 #5 Jofin . Haver�r
�
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.7
TIGARD pLANNING COMMISSION
June 21, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOT�
10865 S.W. Walnut i
TIGARD, OREGON
A. FINnINGS OF FACT
�. GENEItAL INFORMATION
CASE: CPA 4-83 NPO �� 2
REQUEST: The appli.cant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
from low density reridential to medium high density
residential.
RECOMMENDATIO�T: Based on sta€f's analysis of applicabie planning
policies and existing land uses, staff recc��mnendc:
that the Planning Commission recommend t:o the
City Cauncil approval of the proposed
Gompretzensive Plan Amendment from Iow density
residential to medium high density reside�ntial.
APPLICANT: Jerry Cac:h OWNER: Jerry Cach
12525 SW Main SC. Marshall & Joanne Sunnarborg
Tigard, Or. Jannette (Godwin) Wassenburg
LOCATION: 9240 SW Genter St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lots
1200, 1201, 90000, 90001, 90002, 30J03, 90004, 90005,
90006, 900077
LOT AREA: 1.6 acr.es
PRESENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Densit Residenti.al
Y
PRESENT ZONING UESIGNAZION: R-7
NPO COMMENT: NPO �� 2 is inactive at this time.
PUBLIC NOTI�ES MAILED: 40 natices were mailed. No written comments
had bsen received ak the writing of this
report.
'L. $ACRG1tQUND
On May 9, 1983, by ordinar�ce 83-24, the Ciky Council adopted a low
density residential plan designation for tlie sut,ject site. The NPO ��
2 Plan which was ado�tad by the City Council on February 24, 1975
designated the property as medium density.
-- -
� --- - _ �
3. V7CTNITY INFORMATIUN
�e surroundin� land uses are as follows:
The property to the north and west is developed as single family
residential and is designated low density residential on the
Comprehensive plan. The railroad tracks and the Pacific Highwa�
viaduet border the property on the south. The�e are some
professional offices across SoW: Cenrer St. to the east of ttie site.
4. SITE INFORMATION
There are a total of 26 multi-family units on the property. There
are 16 units in the apartment complex on SW Commercial and 8
condominium units bn tlie complex facing Center St.. In addition,
there is a dupl�x on lot 1201.
B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICTES
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
2.1.1 The City s�►all maintain an ongoing citizen involvement prog.ram
and shall a�surc that citizens will be provided an opportunity
to be i�nvolved �.n a1Z phases of the planning process.
All owners of record within 250 feet were notified hy mail of
this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times on
June 9, 1983.
2.1.3 The City shall ensure that information on land use planning
issues is available in an. understandable form for all interested ;
aitizens.
A11 inter.ested parties are given a minimum of ten days to
comment on all land use applications and are encouraged to do
so. Staff is available to answer any questions on appli.cations
or the apglication pxocess.
12.1.1 e it o id . fo d
.
Th C sha11 r v e r housin ensities in acco dance it
Y P g
r w h.
a. The applicable plan policies.
b. The applicable lncational criteria.
c. The applicable community developmenk code �arovisions.
A11 applicable plan palicies, locational criterias and 'Tigard
Muni.cipal Code provisions have been considcred in review of this
application.
The loc3tional criteria to be considered in �etermining a change to
medium high ciensity are as follows:
Medium High and High'Aensity Residentisl
A. The following factors wiil be the determinants of the areas
deaignated fox high density c�n the plan map:
(1) Areas which are nat committed ko low density development.
STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 2
_ _
_
� --- I
(2) Areas which can be buffered �rom low density residential
areas in order to maximize the privacy of estabJ.ished low
density residential areas.
(3) Areas which have direct access from major collector or
arterial streets.
�4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations.
(5) Areas where the existing fecilities have the capacity �far
additional development.
(6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit.
�7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general
commerci.al shopping centers or business and office centers.
(8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open
space.
The property has already been developed to medium high density.
There is a Tri-Met bus stop on Main Street, approximately two blocks
from the subject site. In addition, the Main Street shopping
facilities are within two bLocks of the property.
2. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CQAE
Comprehensive P1an Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard
Municipal Code have been considered in review of this application.
C. CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets applicable planning
policies.
D. REGOMMENDATIOIV
Staff recommer�ds approval of the request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to medium high density, based on the following:
1.. The proper�y is already developed to medium high density standards.
lan olicies an
d zonin
code
2. The prop
osal conforms to existing p p �
re uirements.
q
PREPARED BX: APPR�VED BY:
f r f
�
Elrxa th A. Newton, sociate Plan�ner liam A. Monahan, rector of
Planning and Aevelopment
STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 3
� /'� 7
j 1��/Z � ���l�. Phone: 639-4137
REAL ESTATE Si B�UIILDING SERVI�L
12525 S. W. Main Street �'i asd Ore on 97223
�''sne, 1.4, 1983 g , g
,i
I
T3.gard Ci.ty Counoil ,
City o� Tiga�rd
P.O. `�ox 23397
Tigar.d, Qre. '97223
Re: File No. ClPA-4-83
At�t�s Liz Newton
:The above property in question was, as you know;, zan�d Medium ;
High Dena�.ty. It doee nmt make sense to zone property to
Low D�ns�ty when doing eo would 'bring an 18 unit, a 7 unit
and a duplex into s� nonconforming uiae.
The o�er'e then would be �ae�d w�3.th problems ix� obtaining
�i�nanc�.a�g to rebuild in egse of �ir� or other d��na�� or �ust
�� re��n�ince.
The gr��erty in qt�eatio�. �.s �lose to ever�thi�� and zn�l�es
one of �i��r�:'s better apartment �ites.
Sincerely,
CASH°5 RLTY
� � , /�
� � . . . � ,� � . t .
✓'� '°r� aS�+L�""`
�
Gerald C« Cach
GCG:1�g
a
I� -
,,
�j(,��� ;J ��¢(�. Phone: 63�3-4137
REAL ESTATE & BUILDING SERVICE
12529 S, W, Main Street p�ja,y lg� 1,983 Tigaxd, Oregon 97223
V
. . . ///s/j�� ��J `� �/ //�. • . �����i�it�
V iV�'•"' ��,/� �`/ v�;;r4'� 4%�
��
�
City of Tigard
12755 SW A�h
�igard, Ore. 97223
Re: Block where 9240 S.W. Center is loc�ted or NW � NE � Sec 2 T2S
R1W W,M..-ASA B1ock 64. No�th Tigardville Tax lots 1200, 1201,
,_.Y360,:��.4`U: ,6;.r500, 1649-�c-���48:--and 251 �AB Tax lots 90000, 90001,
� 90002, 90UO3, 900'04, 9000�, 90006 & 90007
If the Block is not zoned b�,ek to A-12 as i� was only � short
ti�e ago, two properties would ��.t �.nto a noncomformin� use.
ans �or two more uni�s on ax�other ropert woul.d have �o b�
P1 P Y
scrapped.
The pxoperty is aontiguous tc� a ma�or arterial ax�d �.butts Main St.
and �ommercial. It i� an�xt to a railroad track �xcept for
Comna��c�al Sta
The property �hould be zoned for 20 uni�s pe� acre beeause of
above and its pzoxi.mity or walkin� d.�atanc� �a s�opp�ng o� a11. sortsd
I am aure this i� an er�or in tranacription of maPs«
T�,nlz you,
C`ASH'� RT,TY
� � I,
� � �
G� � �''� '
Gerald C. C�.eh
GCC:k
enc. ��) � � ��� �� �_
�
, ��
`��/'-' i�'¢� rr�y�'y Bc�c�J-" �,�c,.� �-.�i'�'��
�#�h �
� �
,-,;��} :.f'
�� ,�t�;� �-�� ����
� � �w
�1U��tD
G,�'�NN��G DE��a
P�-p`
� � v
�� � ' � r - . .. _ � � . L
' � �� � .,� �—. . J � i �_ �
� ;
� � ' �;��c ; 1 L �,H,� � r : � 1' �t ; "; ; . :i
�. ��� �=- �� � .. n./S � *.�,� 1 l,��� a ' F9Ei— ���.
I � . � ' � �� � � ��S�M1� r ,� p . ,� - Na.� � �,
. '
� � -i..—..- :. � : � ` � . yjrc .
sw :.�
I r� , ; ; � ��.� ,� .,�_�.�D _ . y__.N_j :
� . .�
'_—+—� �:� � ,�—�—�
,�,,� ,�. _ ;.. _, . � - . ���..o �:.P,� ��„ . i - . �,_. �� �_-.� r
� � .._ . �....
.w ' ,
_ -, - -: . ,., o
'-2.___. . �'� ._7_. r. --1 ., 1`.T , E�r 11�' ;-- 1. "i s ` -
�
'{ � . �
/ a o• .�t., ' J � n�, . ..". � � � . � _ '
. , sr' . . _ �,� u ` s
. � � l.. t _� ` -� ...41 � N.__� . ���� F��- .� - _�(- .�
I � � _
� / .
,
' .� y`. ......�.. � � f � � � � r- � _ .� 1..
;�� 2
'
_ C
.._ �.• �`\ Oq .. _ ._ 1 '1 � " _ • �
. Y
n _L_. i-. �..
�. . .,� 4 :. C 'I ' ' ~
�
•: t ,.�. 9 , .. _ ��
.; m � . ... . _�_... -__. � . • � I�,
` � � �......_. � . � s
� � . . ' � .. . . �.
.__, 4 -
r � �► __ __ � . '—� s . ...
L � - - _
� � �:_ � _P `
. � = r'
� y. — � _� - �� � '!�
I c iT . L , 1 �-. .. gwF"J ��.;� .. ' . � ,M►� . .
1J. 1 C -r — 1 - � j �.. ,�� .� �� o .__l�.
.— . . �_ SW fW •� � . r � u
' .
. � . '_ '.._ R ,'� .
� �-_-� � .s^ . �' � -• �� r
__._,�� .... � 1 . � �� .
� . ." . . i. � \. ^� { �� r� � I ' �\ � ���.
.r f_� �� ^A�� . � ' � �.
� tY� ��
�.�,S�aE T � \ ��tiGH� ::;� � i � ..�tt` � �,� ., -
� . , . � s��.i. .�rc � 1.
.� . . / � ��" ��, �.r �. ` x � �
:, 3 5 �, � ,
i r���t. �r� \ \ � `"--- 2� ! .._. _ �� � i �-
�.��� .'�� J:� \ r'' � � ,1- . 1 �1 f1"e \. .._
1� �\ . . i� �. ��..�-p� . � - ' �' � \ �
.:����7r \` �-._� � , 'rr.' . � � � ) i , ,
��. 9y� � ,`\' �.
� � ;. G�� �
� �� \� �� �
a o N'�� ��r,���, � /'�. / / ��} � � ' � �o r �\I, �
� � ��, '��'y� ���. q �'•�� � t^r .. . �.�.
'''. � � ./�,��/ � �� �' �P4 .'`o .�J ' �.1��
.
. y . \ r � � • � m .i . � �
. � d���`• \ �� c �'\
,
rf�r A�O 'y.�..r � I 1
� / �� � a � r � � ,.
`�! •�s y�t�. �� -1� ,�r ��.. � .\ / .
l� 4j� - � '� � \ . / f r..
e�.� f ,1 ,\ �. .�` . ``��` \. .� �� ��.
�f'�: � ;�� .� N�S�' L "tl
' \ N. �i
\; fJ �\,' . \\ � ` 1 ���� �J'�
� .� � � \ I 1:.
�` �'� ' \ � n m i
��
r' �>�� . � . . \ S�'��ft
�, � p� '' 1 ..� '\ . _'�.
'`` � .. �//�� ��.��_.. \,� \ � ;`��
Y �
' �E� � ,i � 'G P� D � L ;� ��:
�� y{_
f ` �• � L� '� � . \ %/� R'.� .�.
�.�' � �� �r ,'��/l ' �'��.: . .
�� J
y � .
• �Y ^\ F r ..,` • .. '.
e i�, ,�; "��' �-=��,� � ` .," S�_. � .
. � y � �L o c.i.—.�„ , \ �-" ) _ (� -
,/ a' ,,,, " � ' \ I/� � ��\ r' -•�-_'L.► ��
\ A t� . l � , � I \ �� \�r �/ /, �I..
uLE,� 1� , � 1 / lr
O �d"� � � � ♦ �� � ��.
,
i
.
�� ^ <
N � r�
.�s ' �'`:. � �,• � `. -`' _.0 .. n� j ` �•1 !Y � '� \*' .____. L s�-
�r
'�� .'F � � � � I. ,\o
, � + �
; -
� e
s . �,� : ,
.� , . ., .. ���� � ,MAK� . . . _ C...
�� '�\.1��� r`\ . � .. I t ''.,,"r,.. r i �.�.� �� �••�� \`\ . ._
����?�.��e�� . ��,' � . � , . \ ' � r . . � . ., �.... _, \\�r � �\ �0�,��
,� _� t j� , _\ . � 1 � � �
� W� .�LLF . I , � �. � .. 4M �� CO�EW_D0� ' � ' i ,��.
i � , / ��_'�'_r�-.--y...T- � I I
i "---^--__
T , y � �
� _"4a` � .i � ILL�IEW ' _ , �
. � �.:� , , . . � � ' S
— .,.�.Y `.._.. `�.'ODN�ALO • + . ' � �N�\+ ' I . .
. �_-�.... .Wi.. :u �.a_�y.��..-u�..�--J��� ._.�".......__.+...��. .5�idl F i. f� � �
r—.___'�r.-_�r..�.._f_"�I. ' .. . � � . . . ... .. . �.. � . . \ �. �
_.. .._ __-______.__- ... . . ... .. ..._ _. ... � : .. .. . :.--I
STAFF REPORT'
AGENDA ITEM S.3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 21, 1983 - 7:3D P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HTGH SCHOOL
10865 S.W. WALNUT, TIGARD, OREGON
A. FINDINGS OF FACT
l. GENERAL INFORMATION
Case: CPA 5-83 (Comprehensive P1an Amendment) NPO �k6
Request: To change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to
medium-high density.
Recommendation: Based on staff's analysis and surrounding land
uses, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend to the City Council approval of the I,
Comprehensive Plan amendment from low to !
medium-high density. i
�
Applicants: Lucy Scheckla Leonard Scheckla
10200 SW Durham Rd. 10200 SW Durham Rd. 'i
Tigard, 01t 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Marie Collier (Breed) Larry & Nancy Bissett
P.O. Box 83 2004 NW Irving St.
Forest Grove, OR 97116 Portiand, OR 97209
Owner�: same as above ��
Locati.on: 10200 SW Durham, 10350 SW Durham, 16580 SW lOBth and �
Durham and the lot west of 16580 SW Durham (Wash. Co. I
Tax Mag 2S1 14B Tax Lots 500, 600, 601, 700 and 800)
Lot Area: 41.16 acres
Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential and I�
Open Space (see attached map) i,
NPO Comment: NPO ��6 has not submitted any written comments on this
appli.cation. '
Public Notices Mailed: 90 notices were mailed. No written comments
had been recPived at the writing of this
report.
2. BACKGROUND
The subject properties were designated low density residential on the
Gomprehensive Plan Map by Tigard City Gouncil Ordinance 83-24 on May
9, 1983. Staff, however, had recommended a medium-high density
designation. The NPO ��6 Plan, adopted by Ordinance 78--27 on Apri1
24, 1978, designated the property as low densiGy.
_ _ - =- _ —_— --
--J
Staff Report
CPA 5-83
Page 2
3. VICINITY INFORMATION
The surrounding land uses are as follows;
Durham Road borders the property on the north. Across Durhauz Road to
Lhe north is the Summerfield development which is designated medium
on the Comprehensive Plan. The property to the west is developed as
single family and is designated medium-high adjacent to Durham Road
and low 'adjacent to the Tualatin River fsee attached map). The
Tualatin River borders the property on the south. �e property tn
the east is developed as single family residential and is designated
low density on the Comprehensive P1an.
4. SITE INFORMATION
There are existing single family homes and some out buildings on
three of the 5 lots. Tax lot 800 is vacant and wooded with
approximately 10% of the property in th,e 10�-year floodplain af the
Tualatin River. Portions of Tax loGs 500 & 7�0 are also in the
floodplain. The land slopes to the Tualatin River. The portion near
the river is heavily wooded. The northern portion of the land is
pasture land.
B, APPLICAB�E PLANNING PQLICIES
1. COMPRE�tI�NSIVE PLAN POLICIES
2.1.1 TH� CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN aNGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
PROGRAM AND SHt1LL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN
OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING
PROCESS.
A11 owners of record within 250 feet were notified by mail of this
appliaation. A notice was published in the Tigard Times an June 9,
1983. Tn addition, NPO ��6 was provided with an opportunity to reaiew
the application.
o THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING
2.1 3
ISSUES IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL
INT�RESTED CITIZENS.
All interested parties are given a minimum of ten days to comment on
all land use applications and are encouraged to do so. 3taff is
available to answer any questions on applications os the approval
processe
3.5.3 THE GITY SHALL DESIGNATE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD'PLAIN UF FANNO
CREEK, IT'S TRIBUTARIES, AND THE TUALATIN RIVER AS GREENWAY,
WHICH WILL BE THE BACKBONE OF 'PHE OPEN-SPACE SYSTEM,
Staff Report
CPA 5-83
Page 3
Portions of Tax Lotsi 500, 700 and &00 are designated open space on
the Comprehensive Plan because the land lies within the 100-year
floodplain. This application does not propose a change i.n the
designation for floodplain land designated open space.
7.7.1 COMMUNITY ;LAND USE PLANNING SHALL BE GOORDINATED WITH I
PRIVATE UTILITY AGENCIES TO ASSJRE THE AVAILABILITY OF
SERVICES WH,EN NEEDED.
Private utilities such as gas, electricity and �elephone service can
be easily extended to serve this site. Picks Landing and Summerfield
are currexrtly served by private utilities.
12.1.1 THE CITY STiALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DEN'SITIES IN ACCORDANGE
WITH:
a. THE APPLICABLE FLAN POLICIES.
b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA.
c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
A11 a�pl�,cable plan policies, locational criteria and zoning code
provi�sions were considered in review of this application.
Locational criteria for medium-high and high density residential
designations are as follows:
Medium-High and High Dansity ResidenY.ia1
A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas
designated for h.igh density on the plan map:
(1) Axeas which are not committed to low density development.
(2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential
areas in order ta maximize tlie privacy of established low
density rebidential areas.
(3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or
arterial street.
�4) Areas which are not subject t� development limitations.
�5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for
addition3l development.
(6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit.
(7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhoad and general
commercial shopping centers or business and office eenters�
(8) Areas adjacer�t to either private or public permanent open
space.
i _.- -_--- -:_
Staff Report
CPA 5-83
Page 4
The property under consideration is not committed to low density
development. The individual �arcels are large enough to provide
aaequate buff.er from adjoining single family residential development
and still develop at the mediuni'=high density. Tax lots 500, 600 and
601 have direct accegs onto Durham Road. There are no development
limiCations nn the property. The floodplair� area has been designated
open space and will remain open space. Facilities can be extended to
serve medium-high density development on the site. There is a Tri
Met bus stop at 98th and SW Durham approximately 3 blocks from tfie
site. There is a cbmmercial center at Pacific Highway and 99W.
2. TIGARD MUNIGIPAL CODE
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard
Municipal Code will be appLied to the development of the site dr,�ring
Site Design Review. Included in the Design Review are parking,
landsc•ape, access and street improvements.
G, CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets appl.icable planning
policies. The development of the site will be reviewed and approved
through Site Design Review.
ll, RECO?�II�IENDATION
Staff xecommends approval of the applicants' request for a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment based on the following;
1. The proposal meets the locational criteria f.or determining areas of
medium-high density residential.
Z. The proposal meets applicable adopted Comprehensive Plan policies.
3. There is land designated medium-high density immediately west of the
site which is similar in character to the subject property.
� �, r�
/ a
Prepared by: ,�1 Approved by• ���.��. " �, k,.�.,.a"�'��°!(��;�
Eliz eth Ann Newt ' liam A. "Monah�--
Assoeiate plar►ner Di.rector of Planning '
axid Development
Pm
(0051.P)
t
�une 14, 1g83
Tigard Planning Commission
Fi1� Number CPA 5-83 i
�his letter �s in response to the request filed by Lucy and Leonard
Scheckl.a ''et al" to change the density of SW �.08th and SVJ Durham Road
from 1ow to medium high density.
�Ve were transferred to Tigard by my employer. This was my final move
since T will shortly k�e retiring. Tt wa� with muclz excitement and
due consideration we had when Sam Gotter Realt�rs helped us in selec�ing
the just perfect location among those avail.able in the area.
T�.e hig�iest consideration for our property selection was never again ta
be confined to the ''shoulder to shoulder" living of Southern California;
with the shouting, arguing, loud radios, loud cars, a11 night parties.
�Ne bought in Pz.ck� s Landing, adjacent to the Scheckla proper�y, being
assured that it was to be developed in the same manner and density as
Pick� s. T have a State Vet loan - the only way I cauld afford the
property - and have no further access to another loan, having been
moved �wice be�ore by my employer.
Pick' s Landing is a lovely, spacious, quiet neighborhood �w:i.th natural
trees, bir�.s, etc. , ideal �or raising a family, relaxing after a
stressful day at the o�fice.
The Sch.ecklas no�rr want to destroy this seren�.ty by requesting a density
froin low to medium high. This is the third or fourth time uve of Pick� s
Landing have had �;o defend the o�iginal zoning o�' the property. The
NPO at the previous hearing has provided suff�_cient evidence of other
propErties more accep�;able to the hi.gher density,
Scheckl.as had the opportunity to request a change long be�are Pick� s
was �eveloped, t�rhich woul.d have gs.ven us homeawners a choice, i.e. of
no� pu-tting our life savings irito a house next to property that would be
devel.oped into n,on-owner occ;uppied dwell.ings. As it is, we have no
choice, we bought and invested ir� goad faith that the Planning Commission
was lionest and sizzcere in permanently establishing the zoning as it
was when we bought our house.
It is granted that evex5+� issue has �two sides. The Schecklas concern
is over money, which soon wa,l1 be dissipated. Our con.cern. is o�'
liveabil.ity, one of perpetual duration.
Pl.ease vote to keep the exis��ing low density on the �aroperty or a
1�00� buffer o� 1ow densa.ty housi�.g.
Yo�rs tru.ljy,
�` � Y��LG" • `.t'/Y'-�'l�i��4.G�.lO�_-•w "b �"f��1� S t""� -1 -
Lauren Vd. Rickman �,,�� �' ,� •, � �, j�� t�� ���
16380 SW Syl.van Ct. � ��='!� �
r � .�
Tigard, Or. 91223 ,��, �(,�lV 1 � 1�33 �...�:.
�� i`P UF l IC��h'L�
��.�INIVI�►C; [7Ef'T.
f
�"'° � rcn! p
.�
������`,� � �( ��� ���,� �,
(�, , r�, � , ��',� 1
JI.I�J ;� 1983 Larry A. Bissett
2004 NW Iiving St.
Cl�lY UF iIGNKU Portland, oR 97209
PLANN�NCa DEPT. June 8 , 19£33
Mr. William A. Monahan
Director of Planning and Development
Tigard City Hal1 �
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mx . Monahan,
Herewith enclosed is our application for aznendment of the
Tigard Comprehensive Pl�n. We, along with several other
property owners, were allowed by the City Council, to apply
without fee, in order to allow further consideration of the
future residential densities to be provi.ded for in our area.
Altogether , this area includes Tax Lots 500 (Scheckla) , 600 ,
601 (Breed) , 700 (�checkla) and 800 (Bissett) , as shown on the�
attached copy of a portion of the: tax map for the northwest 1/4
of Section 14, T2S-R1W, W.M. It contains over 40 acres and is
bounded �n the north by Durham Road; an the west by the west
line of �ection 14, on the south by the Tualatin River , and on
the east by the Housing Development known as "Pick' a Landing" .
This area is served by sewers which are stubbecl off at Pick ° s
Landing and also by the trunk sewer recent:ty brouyht north of
the Tualatin River just west of 108th. (We have access to
108th by way of a 40-foot private road, over which vae have an
easement for road and utility purposes including sewers. ) The
area is also well served by public transportation and main
arterial streets. Durham Road intersects Pacific Highway (99W)
approximately Z/2 mile from the area, and Pxtends east to
connect with I-5. Bus service is available at the intersection
of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. As the Durham Road corridor
d�velops into one of Tigard' s principal residential areas,
public transit wi1.1 undoubtedly be routed over its entire ',�,
lengthe
The area is close ta both primary ar�d secondary schools.
Shopping is readily available at both the King City and
Summerfield cammercial districts. These districts include
food markets and other retail shops, as we11 as a full range o�
financial and profess�onal services including medical and
dental care.
�
Mr. William A. Monahan
�7une 8, 1983
Page Two
The five tax lots, for whi.ch reconsiderati�n of development
densities is being requested, are almost totally devoid of
pre-existing development. 'Phese are large tracts whzch offer '
the opportunity, especially if developed t�gether, af p�oviding
a unique residen�ial environment. A planned unit d�veloprnent ,
utilizing direct access to the Tualatin River as a �ammon
recreation area �ou1d become one of Tig;ard' s truly outstanding I
residential areas.
For such a prospect to become a reality, the low density
classi�ication which has been given to this area, must be
changed to medi.um high density or at least medium densi:ty. �he
economic reali�ies are that it is no longer possible to provide
the amenities whieh we envision in the context of a large lot
development. Lar�e lats are ino longer as desirable as they
once were. People are more willing to share the outdoors in
common with their neic�hbors, e.g. King City, ��zmmerfield,
Charbonneau to name just a few examples. These developments
have been responsive to the needs of an increasingly larger
segmen� �f the Fopulation and they have shown that high density
development d�es not mean low quality. Quite the reverse: as
large lat developments, these projects coulcl not have supp�rted
the extraordinary common amenities which they now provide. And
the same thing i.s true far the larger community. It has been
well documented that the cost per household of urban servic�s
rises ra�idly as density decreases. These principles are also
recognized in the Tigard Development Plan.
Among the findings in the Housing Section of the Comprehensive
Plan is the statement:
"The rapid increase in housing and land cost over
the last several years has excluded many house-
holds fxom �btaining suitable Yiousi.ng to tn�et
their needs. "
One of the "imp�.eznentation strategies" designed to reduce
housing costs, states:
"The City shall seek ways to minimize the cost of
housing by encouraging a variety of home
ownership alternatives, such as, but not ].imited
to, townhouses and condominiums. "
� _
.
Mr. Wil].iam A. Monahan
June 8, 1983
P�ge Three
One of the principle polici�s of the public transportation
section of the Cnmprehensive Plan is that:
"That City shall encr�urage the expansion and use
of public transi� by lo:cating land intensive uses
in close proxinnity ta transitways."
And this is further restated as an implementing strategy:
"The City shall progose land use den:sities, within the
Comprehensive Plan, along transit oriented corridors that
support public transportation service. "
A basic policy of the Comprehensive Plan is th:at the housing
densities shall be provic�ed in accnrdance with applicable
Locational Criteria. The residential Locational Criteria
enumerated in the Co�prehensive P1an specifically provides that
low density residential should be restricted to,
"Areas which are committed to low d�nsity '�
development and not shown an the 'Buildable
La:nd Inventory' as vacant land. "
The area in question is vacant and listed on the Buildable Land
Inventory. Accoxding to the Compxehensive Plan Locational
Criteria, this area should not be designated for low density
developmento Tt meets o�: exceeds all of the Locational Criteria
for medium density residential and nearly all of the Criteria
for medium high and high c�ensity residenti�l.
Ver tx y y s
-`-. 1
Larry A. Bissett I
LAB/pm
cc• Marie Breed
L�onard Scheckla
Steve Janik
� _ --
P.O� Box 83
Forest Grove, OR 97116
June 6, 1983
Planning Dep�rtment
City of Tigard
12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Ore�on 97223
Gentlemen•
I am respectfully requesting that the recent zone change to Zow Den-
sity on my property (t�.x lots 600 & 601, 2S1-14B, WM, Washington County)
be revereed to Medium High Density as previously designated.
I am particularly opposed to having Medium High Density on a 5 acre
parcel immediately on my We,at border with not even a street or trees
separat�.n:g the two parcels. It would be hard to justify low density
e�pensive bts bordering this 5 acre parcel as well as Durham Road.
It is my feeling that we need to use what little remaining land in
Tigard as ef�ectively as possible. The Satler property, Tax lot 36,
Sec. 15, immediately on my •West, my parcela, Tax lots 600 and 601,
Sec. 1�, and the Scheckla parcel, ta.x lot 500, Sec. 14, immediately
on my �East, a�re eontiguous pareels and are of the same character, at
least for the first 700 ar 800 feet back. This plot of 1and would
be a natural designation �or higher den.sity use. We desper�,tely
need af�ordable housing in the Tigard area and 10,000 aq. ft. lots
would not be afforda.ble housing far th� ma�oxity. Th�re ia a 25'
to 30' barrier plus trees between the Pick� I,andin� par�cel ar_d the
Schleckla parcel and this makes a natux�a,l break between low density
and medium high density zoning.
The people of Picks I,anding are maintainin.g that to put hi�her d�n-
sity next to t�effi would lessen their investment. Ny property has
been in my family since around 1915 a.nd I have owned it personally
for 23 years. I have a much larger investment in time, work, and
monetarily than any of the individuals in Pick� I���ding. I realize
this is not a factor but this property is my sole source of income
for my old age -- which is here-- a.nd I peraonally need to hav� this
property sold f�r its highest and best use. Zow densit,y housing on.
m„y pa�cels with medium high density borderin� me with no break on
the We,st and Meditiun density (A-12) directly across Durham Road from
my lasid wauld not be the highest and best use, much less the most
desirable use. �
The penple of Piaks I,anding are opposed to a change in the atmosphere
of the country side around thanand like to ses open fields and tall
�trees. The trees in the back on my property will have to come down
irregardless of the density allowed because they are over-ripe and
their roots are shallow. The,y would constitute an extreme dan�er if
any were allow�d to remain. I had hoped to keep some trees but have
been advised aga�nst it, We all have to accept chan�e. The people
knew when they moved to Picks Landin� that it was just a matter of
ti�e until -Ghis took place.
� _ _ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
A
�
Planning Dept. page 2 June 6, 1983
I e'incerely feel that I have beez� put in the "middle" aa�d have been
arbitrarily deaigr�:ated as the Mbreak►� between Picks 'Landing ancl Med--
iu�n high density. I certainly feel that this i$ not onl,y an il.logi-
cal brPak but al:so tha� it ig ex�tremely unfaix to me. I would re�
�pectfully requ.est that if you fe�l you cannot change �y parcel (at
least the front hal�) b�ek ta medium high denaity then certa�nly th.e
low den��.ty designation shoulcl be extended through the Satler paxae�,
Tz�x lo�t 3�, sec, 15, immediatel:y on my Wrr.st, �0 108th,
I would like to add that I was not at the original' planning commiesian
meetir�ge because I was completely unaware they were taking p1�a�. I
live in Gales Creek �d do not get the p�pera �.n which the notices
were aaid to have been placed. I moved fram my Tigard home anl,y be-
cause I knew I had no reeourse but to sell this property I have aI-
ways loved in order to live. I have been taxed off of the land.
The county arbitrarily placea a �25,000 per acre assessment on my
land Pven though I do not have a sewer available to my property.
I would appreciate any consideration you `can give me. Thank you.
You �-
�s -
�
, ✓.��
� `
Marie reed (formerly Collier)
I •
'� . .�
� '
' . �
.
� •
� .
y� � P
��� , � �m �
�� � � � ` �i
� �� � i � �0-. _.� �� _ �• e � o i
��■ • / � ��
s'a �. ,.
� '�� �d � �I�
� ��:!{.�LLPIE�:
��� ��
� � � �
� �° �
,� � �
, �r w�
•
' . .
p
• . ■ '�� Y� . ■ ■ .s�. _e �■� r� m-.i;F'S.
' � ' 1
� : �� �
.
. ��, ��
� ' ���� ��I����" ��� ein' ��u�
. .
.
. '�`=e`"'�_�°,..' Q��
• ■ i ii s� � 's� ,►, ;c�'.`%,�,,�
r .... -�• �tm ,�, �%�
����*�����,�� '
i�����`''' �j���i��r �,,,����
��i����' c� �V'� . �yM11\ �:'.,.-�'`, �.�� ���
°' �' •' 4��/i�` e°B� / � . r
, ��-',��9 � ��,1`;,,�I`��1� 0� �:�, �� .
,,� �e�e�l,�`o,� ��q� � �...
� �/, 'y. "0° �p��1�, � �'� �1+
, ��. � . ���,{\� . . ' , � ��
. t`;l , O ' . ( '.
, �K - � � : � � �,
������• n!�r.r� l�o�� A� �'',� <
��� A���� � � �. �'1��9��A' P�� � , �� ,
�� � � _:����it�i ii�ll���.�w�'���r+ri�'1 i �1�__ _ �'' _
. . o -
., ,� �i E1=��= �
.
� _ ►�l1� � : � ! � ''�!,�• �.�
■ �
`�� �� s r ,�
J�--� „ '� ■
� M � = �
� ' ����� /~'�'�A�� �i �
� � �,��� � +` �I
����'� � �
►u•� �� :, �. � .
� � � o�
�
V �I
/ r • .
I ,� . ,
�
I
•
�+��+°S��R 9 9 % �0��Y� .la
� t
�
6
Af��1�D.�
�I��:�i? ��A.N�I�G CONINIi5�It7N ' '
JUiV&, 2 3 , 19t33 -- 7��0 P a Ni.
]E��iTLER J'U1�TQR I�IIG� ��kIOQL
iU865 SW G7alnut 5�.
Ti�ar�, (3r. �722.3 I
�
1. �ALL �0 ORUER
�
.�
2 a e R(JL� CALL
�. .Approval of �Iir.oste� from Jc��e l, 19$�, Planz�in� Comrnissir�n Y�eetznga
�> P�.�nnirag Ccamrnission Communicatian
� 3ahn �mets
S B 1��T�LIC �EARINGS
e ! C�MPREHEIVSIV� �'LAN A.M�NT)J�I+t� CFA 2--�3� COIvII�J'IvITY UEVE'L(3�'k�1ENT CQ�3�
a a 2 COAiPRE£iENSIVE L�LA�T A.MENDNI�I3T CPA 4��$3 C;ASI�y`S RE�iLTY' NF(3 4� 2
5.3 CO�IPREHF�ST�E I'LAN AMEi�AP+IGle1T CPA 5-�33 SCi€EC�T..l�/BREEL7/RIS��xT 23P0 ,� 6
6. Otd�er Busa.�e�a
�
� 7� Ad j ornnnent
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
4` �' : _
e r�:
_� ( I
i
i
,
T � G A !� � P L !� N !� I N G C 0 1� M I S S I � �l �,
FtEGU?,A.R MEE'1'IEV� �
JUEV� 21, 1983 III
�I
ia Pr�sident T�pedino c�E�e�d rh� �n�ering �o ox�rler aC 7:35 P.�C.. �e mee�ia�� I
was h�l.ci at Fowler ,Tunior Hi�k► SrhoAl — In the f.eetur.e RAam, %.OSfi� SW 6,ia�.na�� �i
St. , 'i'xgard A OY. II
I
2. RGLI, C�I.3,�s PFt1�SEN�o Presid�nt 'Teped.ina, Caznmias�.aness Vr�nderwaadm I
Maen, Ed�.n, Chx°i�ten and Uwens. '
( A)iSE�'�: Commis�ioner Lea�re�eCC.
STA�'k': Dir.ec.L-ar ef P�a►Zni.�g and Developmenk Wiili.:m I,
Monah�n; Associate Planners 3�r��y i",oursc�ile and �
Flizabeth Ne�rtoc�, SeC�Pt�ry D�.ane M.. ,I�l�erks.
v
3. Planezi.ng Commissiore minutes from 3une 7, i$�i3, wese �oc�sidexed..
fbmrniseioxaer �di� mo�ved ,ars.d �;au�au�.�si.c�n �tzr.a.sten ��:c�rld�d ta ,appxa�vr� Che
�inutes as su�i�xtt�d. �ic�tion caxrxed by un�animeseas vot� vf ��iss�.one�s
� pre��nt�
4. PLANAiING �GO�R°iZSuE01N COMMtJ�ITCA�'�ON;
o Diz�ector oE t'1.an�qac�� anci �evelb�ment inf.or.med the Corn�i�sa.oa3 tha�t Fton
,TUxdan h�d r��ign�d, leaving two va�ancies. Di��c��$:�on foll�awed
�e�arding xepl3c��ne�Csa
ICommissioner Owei�s a��ive�,
S� PiJBLI�C HEARZNG� �
I
o Pre.sident 'Tep�di€�a apen�d the �ubl.ic he�rings by re�cii�x� t�ze �
pro�ed�sre �a be fQllawr�ci duxin� �he meeGireg.
o ,Tohn �mets, 6�3� �W Bonit�, was ��q�es�ed Co a�espond to coee�nent� m�de
by Planning Conanzisisione�5 ancl Idl'0 # 3 as t�o why tn�is a�ppTic�atxon.
' should be accept�d for appai.ratm�nC ta NPD # 5� AEter leYUghly
discus�i4n Mra Sme�s wiChdreea h�s ap�plS.cat�on,
5. 1 COhiPREi{E�ISIVE PL,AN AM�NDMENT CPA 2—$3 �CommurQity D�v�lopmtier�t Code •
o �?icecCox of Planning aa�d �v�14pm�nC r�eviewe3 prr�cess stsff
praposed for th� public heaxin�.
o A.ss�ciate Plan�n�r Coursolle �xpLaizied thaC the �ode COIYSiS�f:i� oF
ei.ght articles and 66 chapters. The first artncle tn be
revi�w�d wauld be In�roduGtory Yrovisions.
. _ _
�
:
, t �
�U@iLJCC TESTI:MOdVY
� ,
o �c�k� Bl�cisa�e, lYBQa sW �a1nuC, s��ted CF�ny had jusC beguca �h�ax° r�vie�r
�n� w�uYd i�� ga.vin� �rid�.taonal Xnp�C l�t�gd Fass�,.A�r usede�
dr�fina.ticar�s� NP� �tao�sld be dc:fined. AIsoB ua�d�r �i�fbnition o��
p�r�a�n, it s:�a�uld also inc.lud� IdPOs �nd ath�r af�nc:�.a1Ty appo�.nted
c.o�u►�itt�e�.
� .3e�hn G�.bi�onA �50� ��J Ba�bu� Blvdo , �'@�gf.'&�ifl�lIl� Ham� �u.ildex�s, whic�t
wauld be �n�eting C1�� n���. marn�ng ro ravs.es� th� code, woulci hav�
f�a�rhe� i.�apaa�. A fe.w items �af ��sccc�zn �r�: �,
�
L� Q�^. D. �ug�est�d �t��n�in� 01�a.t��en�' ts� "p+erffion°i. �
�,t�.t�l� �R Ques�a�erned the I�nguagp, 1fiTfl�is s�ct�.on suggests.m. e" '
i
''� 1€3vC18 �. FeI,C this was ccaaa��a�ing anrl ucacl�aa�e I
18.20 �. �once�rned wi�h 98o�he�wise, �ha�.1 l��e v�isi01s �s��g����d ��
°'voiclable"
1.�.22.173Q Wzt� re���� to Zorae �hanges, ratFber �han azsa.�ag �h� �I
Pl.anning Ceiananx�sio�,, �da�t same type o� h�arixdgs ��axr�, �u�� as I
a Ei�a�ietgs Uf1�a.c�re :�.1�;a su�ge�Ceci eh�t pexson i�e an attorn.�y. ��
18.?Ztl�34Q 2 a. C',os���xn�d ��aKh w��� "�resc�f°1� �ugg�s�t�d 'i
a��V1<�E?Llf:��l.
3 bm �isked �u�il.ic n�ed be ��ari�i�:d by �t�ff a.� a i�
later dat�w �
18.�4.050 Fe�.t lan�uag� too ��rongr
�
P�gP I-�12 e. `°�t[.aciYea� dwellicigo' i.� nok a p�r��er ���a.a�.a.ta.o�, I
he w�auld pxavide. sta£f with c¢�rr�c� I�asguageT i
3 �. "'t;oeadom�.sa�.um1°a also is naC d��zx��a3 cosr�ct�ya Fie i
�rc�u�.d b� �e�.txng t���th�� wgth Iiotn�eawz�€xs �
,A�s�aGia�.ian tc� rl�rify C�a� l.an�u�g� ae�ci saoul�'
�asavid� icafo�m�ti.oe� zb stalEf,
�
� t
o Gomma.�sion�s �,�{in asls�ri staff Ga �larif� sectgnn E on pag� I-2
� r�garc�i.ng set ba�ks. D;.s�uv��.ar� �e�llowedo
�
t!A
� n C�mm�.ssi.�n Mc�en ask�d sC�ff t�a ex�Zlain sxngle d�:t�cn�d a�s� ��ro 1oC
� Zine oz� �page I-�11 sect�on b. Di�ceassi��. fol�.a�rede
�
C9 PUBLIC kIEARIIVG �LQS�D '
t.0
�
o ,AssaciaCe Plannex Ca�r�o�.Le ravbew�d 1#r�icl� IT, PzoGedure� �°or
I3�ci�ir�ra Making.
P��.�NNIIdG �QMt�1TSa�AlJ M�FTZNG hSI�IUTES Jur�e 2�, �.98� Pa�e 2
4
f
Y
' • , _. /
YUBLIC °TESTTN10IvY
o �ol� �l�dsme, F�PO � 3 Chaa.rper��e�, �:eque�ted tha+t whec� Tlhe Plar�na�.g
'�p Di.xecCcrr �aaaves require��ni:s e�r ar►forns�t$on th�t gt be ciCec3 �.n the
��a�f se�acaz�t. Q{e xequest�d when additional z.n�aemat�,on is required
by the P�.a�►c�ing Dxxe�.tor, this �hou�.d also be cit��l an Che Staff
Repoz�. �1�0, t�eey e�ould like i� sCrs�ed in C�he c:n�3e �'h�t the !,
Placani.ng e^.oendrea�sa.�n, Park Bcrax� �ar►d �1P�°s wro�Id h�t►e f�es waive�i.
i ilnder 180�2.270� B 3 re,�arcdi.ng written a�gus��mt only, tEa�y fe�� Ch��
p�erecmra�d �argument� steauld b� accept�blP.
u .�o�an �i�abono 95�Q SEd Baxb�sr �P�vd, e stgt��3 hi.s cencese�. fcrr wh� c�� �
m�k� an applicaCn.�an for char�e. H� wi7.1 be �ubmi��i.ng �� �taffe
language li�ave�to�e has incoi��oxat�d an �k�ea�c C�ompreh�cnsive �iae�, � ��
�rhich he fel� wa� a�dF�quate, I
►
PUBLIC HEARING CL�SEA
o A�sociate Pl�nner Coas�so�.le revi�we�d ArCxcle Tix, Zatn%ng Aa.skrz�ct
Classa.f.�.catzon� .�nnci Requiz��►�en�s, whi�� %.c�clud.es use ciassifacatia�a
I and zo�:�n� di��tri�ts f�nm residentz�l tc� xncius¢:a•b�Ze
PU�LIC TESTZPinYd�
I �
� o Fiot� Fii�dso�, I3�'� 3 C���irp��saa�, recommended �1haC under 18.4��.0�0 Ho
ehat mabiAe l�cm� p�rtcs be c3eleCeef as a candi.tioe��� us� o� �rziGl:en �.n
l,he c�de that tdne d�ns�.ty sYtoa.eLd not be redueeds Lfcxcler 1$.SOa030 �,
��qus:st�d sC.a�f e�i.m�.x��te moE�ile hame parky aaad subciiv�isxorts as
pea°mit�teci us�s and r�ak� them conciiCional us�s R F�e �l.so �noted Chat
I sectz.on I�.,94 is in�c�na�.sc:�nd: �rz.th thas ctsapCere
� o �ary Ott, NP� �� 1 Ac�a.ng Ctaaa��aerson, sr.a�ed �here was no�k►i�d� in t�xe
CBD zone whied� addressed ��e den�i�y is�ue. H� �ca��d t�a�C aancl��
secCAOn �8e5�<03Q C a mircimum of 20 uni�s p�•r acr�� caa� u�ede �.sk�d
that �has �Ze r�arifisd�
I
0 3ohr� �ii�bon➢ 9��0 S41 H�arbea� B1�✓d. statecf he 1Aad d�ne a Aurvey ��td �
, every a��hex jurisdr,c�ta��n use� 7,OU0 sqa ft. lots an�tearl vf 7�()0 sg. �
ft. 1qCso l�e sug�e�te�l to m�ke i:ta� �vlan con�iste�ag w��.kt� ra���ex
w� should rhan e our It �+.5 :.one �� 7 0630 s . ft. lat:s.
'uri.sdi.�c�tions g � q
J
rs Mark Bake�, Kindec C�ae I...earnang Cen�.era Inc. , r�ec�uest�d etaat �ay
Care b� all.o�a�d in Comanerci.al zones.
c� i�ildred Gl.aria 3ohnsora, 9300 S.W. Hall Se. requested t��t D�ay Care
not be a1l�rwed �.a� residen�tial a���so Also, rsque�ted C�I3 de�►sity .
�.ssue be addressed icz tlie code, ailmwzn� omly du�lea�s �ex� tc� the
�esi.dential areas.
o Discussicrn follow�d re�ardin� Day Car� �aciliei�s
PL�4NNIN� COMMYSSION M1t�U1'ES Juc�e 21, 1�$3 Pag� 3
.�
� .
� �• r �
o �nx►is �'�leib, �arc°is �eg�s �nd Simp�o�, rc:s�zesentgng Faxrners
7casuc�nce �roup reques�ed tha� hoteLs be permitted ica the i;omenerca.�I
�'ro���si��al zo��. S[a�f �t�Cect they ha�l i.a�cludecf hot�ls as a
cond�.tional use an Che Cosmne�c��.al Progessim�al zonp� is�. lransi�K�r !
hc�us ing. �
c+ Associ�.t� P'lacz�n�:� Necakan st�Ced sta�� t��d s�ceiw��cf �wo l�kters, or►e
fresm �rP:�ur �����aaien requ�stzng ��S�t mat�1—�esCaeax°�nt cs�a�pS.ex tne
pex�itt�d �.n a CP �.one acs �he �rza�g7,e b�tcaeee� Pfaf��.� Sto ansi
Paci.fic H��hwa�r. 1�te� �e�a�.cf Ie�t�e� was frc�m �'im�e 0�1 Co. requ�stirn�
[h�� a cc��n�aence stear� b� permaCt�:d xn � M-�4 zoaa� e�l��n tse�ng us�d in
conj�cctz.on e��.�th �u�l servic�s, >
c� ,Tohn ��.bb�rnn r��presereking �:i�se�€ a, � par�nt a;eGCa�un�n�ed that Cfzild ,
Ca�� be: a per�itt�d us� z� � �r�ex�ial. Pro£es�ional zaneo
I�epres�r►�fd�g Rob�rk iZ3�d�11 Gompany h� �xpresseci ha.s conce�n �or the
CBD, aaat allowin� l�.�i�t i�cisastrial za� an ea�ist�.a�g m�.z�i.—�rUSa�e
c+�mpl�x. �le ��s�g�sted a possfbl� �unse� wlause n� allow as a
condit�.mre�1 use� �L�l:f x�:vA�wed his�c�sy anci �'URA°s inS:egnC �� p�aase
4ut inuu�triaD. use� in c:Y�e C�B.
I�EC�F'SS 9:15
IR.�COI�VEIVE 3:32
o L'rimm�.wszoner (?w�n� �c�t�d aa�c3er gz°au� car� rPSid�x�txal that ��
�€idi�ic�n �f Lhe �er.m nne:�ta3.1� dis���e��:si we s�hocal¢i �Se u�i�sg m��.���3.�y
re�arde�i. �lh� w�� also �onc�rY�ed a�iaut taavYn� h�te7./mo�el in the
�s���xca�al Pr�fes�iac�a3� zo�x�e, e�peci.a�.l.y in r'�a ac�ae�ll.s Fezr�r Rciv
�s�aa �
c Comm�.ssioe�er Vandesurc�od questioned why 3,05Q s�� ft. lots u�ere I
pex�mit�eci a.n a �.--7 zone wikh a�ztached ha�six�go Di�cuss�an follo��ed. il
�I
PUBI.IC iHE:tlR�id� CL�sEI} I
w A,ssociae� P2�nnes re�riewed �rticle �V ��r��lay Dis�xi�c�s, urk�icta III
an�:lud� �Aa�an�d I�eelc�pmen�s, His�a�i� E)v��l.ay Ili.�tri�ct� Sensikzve �,
Lands, ��t;ablished �,reas ar�ci I�evQlop�.ng .�reasm '�
PTJBLIGs '£ESTIk1�I�Y
� �
� o �exaldine Ball ask�d� staff ta expl�ix� �k�� ��oerla� a�n sea�s�.Ca.ve l.acads Y �
� what at �aac2�de�D taow zt �aorka �nd sataat i��luence C�e� �.ttc,rr�ey ,
� Genex�al°� x•ulxn�; I�ave on r.i�e C:a.ty m� I'iga�d �w��k.ay pasCzmr� c�f �ti�: �
„� �muiuraYty Unvels�pm�rsC Cc>cle� Dis�ussion €aiio�eda StafEf �t�cec� th�y
t�! would h��ve to con�ult legal �oun,el bef:or.� tk�ey cauld revpa�c�o
�
� PCIBLEC HE�iA�NG CLQSED
o AsNociate F�anr�e� �oursal�.e revie�ed A�-�'acle V Su�pl�raental
Provis i�ans e
c� Bob �ieds�e, �c�spr�sent�crg hai.mselL`-, quesCic+ned section� 1$.9(�s080
regaadin� attx��c�ing 1StSECCS or rade�aCS. He f�lt t�zs wou1G be
diEEi<;ult ta enforce,
Pt.E1NNIP�G COMI�tIS5I()NER hiIN41TES Jurte 21, I983 �'ag� 4
/� �'
�
o �ab Bl�deoe, repx�esenting [VFO � �, �ecomm�nded �ha� mobYle taome
subdi�+isions SeceAOn 18.94.�20 �. nc�t tae. ��llawed a�s a perani�tecl use
iez � R-3.5 �r �t-4oS zane�. '�"h�y sug�e�Ced makin� �h�m cor�r3irianal
uses in Lh�se xones �r�d e].Ymi�tating R—�. and R°-2 �� ca�zrdiC�onal us�s.
Und�r Section 18.94.1�3� tk�at cnobil� home p�rk� not be permitCed �n
and R-4.�a to m�l.ce it a coc�ditiana� use �n �haC zanea �i�n elimanate
enobal�: hc�a;i�e� as a �ac�di��gon�l u�e is� R—�.5.
f�nother e�nGPrn is Che d�nsity c�.4cul�txon, they f�lt tt�at .th� �taff
propc�s�l e��s rmo�c� x�est�°ictf�re Cd�ax� thcy ��lr n�uess�ryo 1k►ey
sugg�sted re�rrar►�ing tl�e �rder b� ��vang n�mbe�r fa�ar to iaumb�r two
�and L-hex�eby e�QVing c�unnb�x� ��ro �a ttx�e� ��d Claree t� E��rm 7°�ae�e �ah�n
�al8eang ab�ut a11 2and �eciieate�. Lor ,�u�aXic right o� uaay9 i� sho�sid
be al.l r�mainin� land aft�s ¢i�ductan� tha u�rbu�lct�bie 7.and�e .
sensrtz.vp l��,d� an.d for parlcso �.l�ss th�y fsik tl�ere si�oul� b� �
� dec�sity Cransfer far �.acads dona�ed �s par�s9 �Sr�v��.din� tkeey dn�°C
rec�ive credat �ar �ysCems L►evelopm�nt. Ch�rg�s on tkt� ss°��ne dedicaGi.o�a
k'UBLIC �IEARItdG GLOSF'D '�
°,..�,�,
5.2 Ca�2PP�EH�iVSIV�: PLAN PaM��I�MEidT' C�'A 4—E�� ��sh's Realty NF� �F' 2
A reque�t to charr,�e t�►e C�mpzek�enss.ve �'Ian cies��na�z.o�n fxo�n lew to
mediva� h�.�h+ densi�t}r ese� pxc�p�:rtJ� lacat�d aL 9240 So�a Ge��er 5tca
E�'��he Gs�e �ax Map 2S1 �AB lc�� 12�?l!, 1?C3X, ROUOOp �3��JO�.s 9�3(?0�,
900t�3, 9Q�U�a, 9Q��55, 400Qf� and 900070�
ra ��ar_aS:e P�.anr�ar Newton cn�de s�aff's ��c�mmend�tzon fa�° s�rprravalo I
o Mars�all Sur�r�arborg, 767� S.W. Varx��s, pso�er�� nc�ner �+� ��t 12Q0, �,
where an apartanent exa.s�s o ��e s�.���xt��d th� z��te ch�nge, �s Ck�� I
prap�rtv was already dev�lo�s�d ae the ��ediea�e �i�t� �e�csa.t�, j
a Ba�b I�rasQn rec�uested sta�f �tA e�s�laiei tlae diffexe�xc� xn tihe
densita�s. H�: wxntsd to ga on r�cord o�spa�sz.n� thi� z�ne Gtaan�eo '�
o Varz Dal.t�o�:i, I.?110 �iJ 92nc�, a�po��d ti�� �u�xe change, ���ta.ag he w�� I'
�on�ercxed Chat mc�r� �par�m�cqt� �o�xl�. be bui1C a�n tti� �x°op�rty �ahere
the duplex, exists.
c� Bruce La.nds�y= 12130 S�I 92nd, oppas�r� Ch� zane ck�an�e, statin,g ��.s
r_oncErn bei.ra� Chat the prop��ty va�ue w�ul�i ��creas�e. I
I
CROSS EXAi�INATIOid AND REI3UTTL� II
o Cammissioeaer �di.s� re�uested sC�ff revie�a w�aat the surrounding II
properties a�e �oned and what as currentl� cor�str+�R:e� on l-lie - �I
properties being pLOp�sed for rezoni�ng, D�.s�us�gon fol.lowred. Major ,
conc�rn being that C�e tax lot 'L201, c�i��h �kz� s�uple� on it, could '
have ths duplex removed an� bui3.r� apartments. ,
o Commission�r Moee� qu�stn.on�d tthe ppssiblity of �h����.r�,� density tc�
medium g�r lat 120�.. S�a�f statec� they h�� na prabl�a� �aith ti��C
change. '
FLAN�VIN� COhiMI�SION MINU'.("ES -- June zZ, .1983 Pa�e 5
i _
R �
� � 1� � �
I
COMMIS3ION f17SCUSSTON t1IdD AC1'IOIN
o Ccmma.ssaon�er Moe� moved and CommiSSn.onex Christen seconded to
��comanencf appx�aval and forward to City Counci.l of Compreher�sive Plan
Amen�ment CP,A 4—�3 �rom low densit�y ta m�ediuE�r taigh deresity an all
Lc�ts pragosed �xcepC tax lo� 12�1, c��aich woulc� be ct�ara��d F�o¢n Io�r
density to med�.um density petr st�f�°s reca�r�m�ndatio�s anci fic��iix�gso
Nlat�.or► carrnec3 sar.ar�imou�l.y by� Commissionex�s presenta
So3 COY�I�C�LHE3dSIVE Pd.AN ,Atf��dl)M�Cd� C�'t� `��€i3 SCEiEG:CL,r`�/B1�EED/BISSET'L' NP� � 6
Es request ta ct�ange ehz Comp�c�l��nsi�re Fl.an desi.gn�tion gx�om ].o�a �o
mzcliu�n high d�ns%ty an t�e �ollacaitlg prc��per�ies: 102C10 �.W. X}urhamt
1tb3S0 SaW. Dua�hac� acad 16180 S�W. �.08th and Durt►a�n Road. (Wdsh. Co.
Tax Ma� 2SZ 14B �ax lot 50�fl, 6A0, 6(D1 and 700)
o Elssociate Pianc�er N��tescs made s�a�f's recamznerc��uta�e� �or �gprc��al.
o Fhzl Pas�eris, NPt� �� 6 Ckn�i.r�er�on ra�ase�d save��I point� op�c�sing
s�aff°s recamme�xdaCa.an, �taC�.ng a peti�iczn had been suP�inittr�d wi��l�
�apprc�xzmategy 80 signa�ures �eque�ting pr�aper�y rema�.n �.o�r dea�siL�.
n Bit�nanne S�cla�cicla, x�presentin� a�p7.s.�cant �Lu�y S�h��:kl�g �tated th�at
` th�y had netyer been �.nforrned of ai�p NPfJ meetings, otl�erwise �tt�y
WC2L37.d ha�r� be�n �aFp� ta ak,�.ende Sh� c�xitinued b;y rec�ix�sCZCUg tin�
i'lanni.ng �oe�un%ssi.an sugg�rt the staff recc�nunenc�ation �or �p�rowal of
tiae Com�reh�nsiv� Pl�n CEIa'1C1gE.' to m��i�am hi�h stat�.ng te�e �,�r�p�;x�ty
meers all requirements ko suppr�rt t�� cnec�iasm high d�nsiey,
c� hlarie Sreed., app�icant� sta��d she h�� cia� ��come s�wase of t��
ch.anges �,roposed foz� h�z property �nti1 the ecad of Apr�.1. St�e did
� nqt fee��. low densg.ty was th� �71��1E3�' and best use fo� �h� pro�ert�r
� and thdt it was u�faxx to h�r as th� praperty own�rd
0 3.arry Bis�ett, app].i.�ankr stated Ch� re�son t�� prop�*��;� �hau).d #�e
designatsd �ediu�n o�� medaum ha��li as it is loc�ted �close tU �cha�ls
� and p�blzc ses�✓a.c�s. 7't�ey alsca have an easemen� to bG$th sahi.ch s��uld
elimanate taav�ng to incr�a�e �Z'flFf3C thraugh existing x��:srdentz�l
ar�as. If �h+e praper.ty a.s Ie�t low de�sity i� w��,►Id raot be
cansistenr� wath �h� gc�<31s of th� Compr�h�:x�sive Plano
a I.eonard Sch�e4claP appiacant, stat�d he ha�i awned hxs pro�ere� far 42
years and requested Che P�.anna.ng Commiss�.oner t� desi.�nat� the
�xc�p�erCy fcer meciium hi�t� dan�ity.
�'U'BLIC TESTCMONY •
o Debb�.e Craig, 1�D1.S5 SW Jerg�ns L,ane, re�d and subrnatted a le�Cer
opposing the medium hi.gh densi.ty.
o G_-eg Sny�ery SW Riverwood Lane, represer�ting praperty owners �rom
Pzctcs I.,�nding, �ppr�sed the medx.um hxgh dens�t�. '�t�eey had pu�chased
their prop�erty witiz the belief �F�ae the ad jacent propsrCy woul.d
x•�main low densiCy.
P�A.NIdING COMMXSSIONER MZ1V!lTr.S Jur�e 2I� 1983 P�g� 6
�
;
. ��
• I
�
'�,
o Penny b1�.11s, SW Kent t'lace opposed ehanging the densi.ty Erom II
ic�w. She also read a letter from Laureea Rick►nan �nd Daniel and '
Cheryi Uuke opposin� ttde medium high densiey and re�esting it rPma�.►� • i
iow densbty. I
CR��S GX/�,R�IINATIOL� AND REBUTTLE
o �larie �reed, appli��n�, question�d being arc��xed in�o rh� City; s�a�f
r�spor�ded at the tame of deve�opmeree she would havre Co ar�n��: in�cs the �
Gi.ty�.
o Asso�cia�e 1°I�n.n�r Newton explained the Urbar� G�ora[[z Bou��ary ar►�i '�
r�va.�w�d h�w the prope�Cies had b�en design�te�i t�r low deetsi.tyo II
o Dis�e►�sion f�lio��d reg�rding the NP9 mee�ing, wh�n ttaey a�� t�el.d, �I
how people axe n�tifa�d ��d saha to c4ntack. i
I,
ce 5tev� P�trazeAa, 998C1 Skl �tive.=.awood, qzAestian�d how oft�n cauld the I
applicant a�sgly �or � Compreh�n.�i��e Pla� Amex�dm�catp sCa�f resgZCanded
twxce a year is t�e ��nl� �ime Ghe Pl�ne�ia�g Cnanm.i�sivn hears
Comp�re�iensive P1an Amendm�:nts. Discussion followeri.
�
o Discussion followed regasdi.ng the ai.gference betwe�n l�w, �ediu�n and
m�edium high densxt� a�.d �h� use of the pllanned d�ve�.oprne�nto
PU�iLT.0 HEARING CT.DSEA
PLA�II�ING C(3Y�MISS:CON DISCUSSIUN AIVD ACTIOLV
o Commisszon Moen camment�d l-.l�at he could identify witn t�he Pz�ks
Zanc#ireg group and did ►�c�t �uppr�rt the chang� ��o medi.um 4►igh cl�a�sit�a
�
o Commissiorier Edin c�id not fe41 z�em nunaber two, re�arclin� buffe�ing, I
had �i�en ad�qua�.ely addres�erl Ca detex�raine i.f zneciku�n high densityr
wo�ld tae ap�rok>ri�te for �h�.s pr.op�ar�uo k�e did na� suppo�� ttne l.ew
or. t�e me�iium hi.gh densiC,y. Fas a s�oo�h traresitiori, m��iuea d�nsi�y
wi�h a Pi� o�rerlay �aould L�e more a�prz�priateo
o Cc>mu�issi.on�r•s Chri.ste�, �wec�.s, �/anderwoc�d pre�ex�s�d �,gie med.�um
de�si�y with a plann�d develo�me►Yt nvPr�.ayo �
�
o Chair.cnars Te�edino sta�ed he wouZd prefer th� p�r�ie� Game ko an
agreeiY►ent as no one can guarantPe tk�at a a�eig�bors �a�ope.rty wiZ1
remain the sa�ne.
o Con�missioner Edin pnoved �nd (;flrmnission�x Christen secor►ded to ano�iify
Compret►ensive Fla�. AmPC►�ment CP�1 5°8� t� reflecC a medAU� deensit� •
wiCh a pianned d�veZopment flverl�y �nd recomnserid tu Caty �un��t�. for
approwal. &ased on �ublic [estimc,ny and �Caff, fxndings ancl
reconmendations a density of 6-12 units per acr.e i.s requ�sted wi�:�
the low density� �eing along Picfcs Iandr��� and tk�e ri�eer, with high�er
' densities aloctg Durhama
Motion carried by majori�y vote o£ et�e Commissioners px�senC,
Cortuna.ssionex Moen voting rio,
p1..ANNING COMMgSSION Mltdi)TES ,�urie 21, 1983 — �a�e 7
-----�-„--,. ,�---� _
.� „
� e
. , �
r
� �i �
u� { "
Dia�. . Jeider s, S�cretary �
;'�R.TTEST: /''
� -� C��
, J,-_�_
' �
� �,
__�._.___ ____ _ �.y____�__a _M__a�_ �
Frarec i s le ed ino, pr�s i�des�t
v a
I
B�,
� �
�"
�
�
� I
� ' �
� ,
aA