Planning Commission Packet - 12/07/1982 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
i
T I G A R D P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 7, 1982
1. Vice-President Speaker called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. The
meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room, 10865 S.W.
Walnut St., Tigard, Oregon.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice-President Speaker, Commissioners Edin,
Christen, Leverett, Owens, Bonn, and Moen.
Excused absence: President Tepedino
Staff: William Monahan, Director of Planning and Development;
Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner; Elizabeth Newton,
Associate Planner; Frank Currie, Public Works Director;
Adrianne Brockman, Legal Counsel; Diane Jelderks, Clerk Typist.
3. Minutes from November 23, 1982 were considered. Commissioner Christen
moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to approve the minutes as presented.
Commissioner Moen arrived at 7:42 P.M.
4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
• Vice-President Speaker announced the Public Hearing Item 5.2
Subdivision Application S7-82 had been postponed.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• Vice-President Speaker opened the Public Hearings by reading the usual
statement of authority for the procedure to be followed in the meeting.
5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS
A request by various citizens to be appointed as members of NPO #1, 3
and 6.
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan made the Interview Team's
1
recommendation for appointment of the following individuals to the
appropriate NPO.
Michael A. Smith NPO #3
David Atkinson NPO #6
Carolyn Eadon NPO #1
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• No one appeared to speak.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION'
• Vice-President Speaker stated he was on the Interview Team and again
was delighted with the quality of the individuals coming forward to
participate.
• Commissioner Bonn moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to forward the
names of the three individuals to City Council with recommendation for
appointment.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Commission present.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC HEARINGS
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan explained the need for
the Comprehensive Plan was to meet LCDC goals and guidelines. He
continued that Jeremy Coursolle had been hired specifically to work on
the Comprehensive Plan. Jeremy has been reviewing documents which
have been guiding the Commission. He has been trying to take seven
plans and make them into one. Staff has been activating the NPO's and
meeting on a regular basis. At times this process has been difficult
due to the lack of available resources and also trying to be
responsive to the needs of the community.
The City Council has granted a 45-day extension per a request by the
Park Board and NPO's for additional time to digest the information
presented.
The schedule for tonight will be item 5.3 Air, Water and Land
Resources; 5.4 Economy; and 5.5 Public Facilities and SErvices. On
Thursday, December 9, they would hold a public hearing for Housing for
public input only. No action would be taken by the Planning
Commission. Beginning January 18th, there would be public hearings on
Natural Features and Open Space; Transportation; Housing; and
Urbanization. City Council would have their hearings on January 25,
26, and 27. Sometime towards the end of January or the first of
February there would be hearings on the Tigard Community Development
Code.
5.3 CPA 7-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES
QUALITY.
• Associated Planner Coursolle explained the Air, Water and Land
Resources Quality addressed LCDC #6. It covers the issue of solid
waste disposal which overlaps with the Public Facilities and Services
element. His resources were DEQ, Metropolitan Service District and
Washington County Planning Department. The element is geared to the
years 1980 through 2000. Associate Planner Coursolle then read the
proposed language changes to POLICY 4,1.1 and 4.3.1.
• NPO REPORTS
Lou Ane Mortensen, Chairperson for NPO #3 stated that they did not
have enough time to review the document changes and had no input.
PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Gloria Johnson, 9300 S.W. Hill St. , was concerned about the trees,
natural vegetation and greenways. She was not certain if this was the
appropriate time to speak.
• Staff felt the issue would be better addressed during the public
hearing for Natural Features and Open Space.
• Dr. Joseph T. Hart, 10993 S.W. North Dakota St., thought he might be
premature, however, he wanted the Commission to know he felt his
property was designated open space. He had submitted a letter to
Associate Planner Coursolle outlining the use of the land. He wanted
the opportunity to come and speak again at the appropriate time.
PUBLIC PEARING CLOSED
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
▪ Commissioner Owens asked what type of recommendation was staff looking
for.
• Associate Planner Coursolle stated the Commission could approve the
element as is and forward to the City Council; approve with
modifications and forward to the City Council; or send back to staff
to revise and resubmit.
• Commissioners reviewed pages of concern with staff.
• Commissioner Bonn questioned NPO #3's submission regarding the adding
of locational criteria. Staff replied this would be addressed later
on in another element.
• Lengthy discussion followed regarding the use of septic tanks versus
the public sewer system with new development.
• Commissioner Bonn moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to recommend to
the City Council approval of CP A 7-82 with corrections, modifications
and the revision as outlined in the memorandum from the Department of
Planning and Development.
The motion carried by unanimous approval of Commissioners present.
5.3 CPA 8-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: ECONOMY
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan explained the Economy
Element addressed LCDC Goal #9 which reads: "To diversify and improve
the economy of the state." He has attempted to address conditions
regionally and statewide. Monahan read a new finding and Policy
#5.1.5 into the record.
• Economy element was reviewed page by page inserting correction and
additions.
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
•
• Commissioner Moen questioned if the Planning Commission would be
acting on staff's modified element or the one they had received
previously. Director of Planning and Development stated they would be
acting on the modified element.
• Discussion followed that Policy 5.1.5 was too general.
• Commissioner Owens noted that much of the Action Plan is repeated
almost word for word in the Implementation Strategy. How is the
Action Plan different from the Implementation Strategy.
s Director Monahan stated it is only an elaboration of what we intend to
accomplish with the implementation strategies.
• Commissioner Owens questioned if the information in both the
Implementation Strategies and Economy would become outdated by the
time the review period happens. If so, is there a way to update on a
current basis.
• Director Monahan stated that the inventory of economic information
will be updated within the economic development program. Staff will
try to have as such up-to-date information and additions to provide to
prospective developers on a continuing basis. One of the goals of the
Economic Development Plan would be to maintain an inventory of
buildable land in the community.
•
• Further discussion followed between staff and the Commission regarding
f language being appropriate in specific sections of the Economy Element.
RECESS: 9:30 P.M.
RECONVENE: 9:43 P.M.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• JB Bishop, 10505 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , #303, was concerned that there was
nothing in the Economy Element regarding a Capital Improvement Plan.
Presently there are not any existing policies to address this issue
and felt it was time to start thinking toward that direction.
• John Butler, NPO #1 Chairperson, stated that NPO #1 felt that Policy
5.1.4 needed some rewriting to include buffering. Also, it appears
that Policy 5.1.4 should be under Urbanization rather than Economy.
• Mrs. Gloria Johnson, 9300 S.W. Hill St. , questioned the high density
in the Central Business District in relationship to the residential
area. She could fine nothing in the document regarding buffering.
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan stated that same issue
was discussed at the TURA Advisory Committee meeting. He suggested
Mrs. Johnson become involved in NPO #1 and also attend the TURA
meetings.
PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
• Commissioner Owens asked Mr. Bishop if Policy 5.1.3 contained what he
was looking for Mr. Bishop stated Policy 5.1.3 was site specific and
he was looking for an overall City policy.
• Discussion followed regarding adding another Finding and Policy.
• Commissioner Moen wanted to know what kind of language Mr. Bishop was
proposing. Mr. Bishop stated he was looking for strong encouragement
and active coordination from the City for forming Commercial and
Industrial LIDs.
• Further discussion followed regarding Local Improvement Districts and
initiating a policy encouraging and coordinating LIDs.
• Consensus of the Commission was to have staff prepare a Finding,
Policy and. Implementation Strategy based on information discussed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• Commissioner Bonn questioned if the issue of bufferin6 brought up by
NPO #1 under Policy 5.1.4 was covered elsewhere in the elements.
• Associate Planner Coursolle stated there are three areas where
buffering can be addressed. One is the Development Code; second would
be to look at buffering policies; and the third could be Chapter 11 of
the Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies. It could also
be dealt with through an NPO #1 Policy.
• Commissioner Speaker favored staff working on a buffering policy, as
this is obviously a strong concern.
• Associate Planner Coursolle added that there is already in the Housing
document a stepping down process from more intensive uses to a single
family residential area. For example, next to a single family
residence a duplex or two attached units would be compatible.
• Commissioner Edin encouraged having a policy. He had chaired the CCI
meeting where they had discussed these issues and he feels it is a
significant enough issue to have a policy regarding buffering.
• Associate Planner Coursolle felt that this might be best addressed
under locational criteria where you can set down standards for
specific areas.
• Commissioner Moen felt that the buffering and high density issues
might be better addressed in another section and supported leaving
Policy 5.1.4 as it is in the Economy Element.
• Commissioner Speaker & Edin agreed with Commissioner Moen.
• Commissioner Bonn questioned whether they should wait until staff had
submitted language for the LID.
PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
•
Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to approve
and forward to the City Council CPA 8-82 Economy, subject to review
and insertion of language on LIDs and including corrections and
additions submitted by the Commission.
The motion carried by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present.
5.5 CPA 8-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
• Commissioner Owens questioned if the document distributed at the
meeting had substantially different wording than the previous document
submitted.
• Associate Planner Coursolle explained that the policies are the
primary wording changes, is different from the one in the blue
document, and the policies relate to CPA 13-82, Findings, Policies and
Implementation Strategies which has had subsequent updates.
• Discussion followed regarding holding the hearing over until Thursday,
December 9, 1982.
Commissioner Owens excused at 10:20 P.M.
a Associate Planner Coursolle stated that the Public Facilities and
Services addresses LCDC Goal #11 - Public Facilities and Services.
This element includes storm drainage, water service, police
protection, fire protection, private utilities, schools, health, local
government facilities, library and solid waste disposal and
recycling. The element includes a number of charts relating to
existing status of various service districts.
The supplement, which consists of policies, relates to the policies in
the element CPA 13-82. When the original Public Facilities and
Services document was drafted, staff had as many as 60 to 70
policies. Staff was advised by the City Attorney's office that they
could inundate the City with policies and still be spinning their
wheels. This brought about the drafting of the Findings, Policies and
Implementation Strategies document. It is updated a new information
and input is evaluated.
• Discussion followed regarding how to proceed with the new information.
• Associate Planner Coursolle outlined how the document was combined and
explaiiied the types of changes that had been made.
• Commissioner Speaker questioned if CCI had seen this document.
Associate Planner Coursolle stated that the CCI had not seen the
revisions.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Bob Santee, Tigard Water District, informed the Commission that a lot
of the information in the Element under WATER SERVICE is outdated,
erroneous and does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. He
PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
continued that it does not address the primary problem of water
supply. He offered his assistance to the staff in revising the draft
to make it accurate. He then reviewed several items in the document
which were not accurate.
• Commissioner Bonn asked Mr. Santee if there was any discussion going
on between the Tigard Water District and the Metzger Water District
regarding merging. Mr. Santee explained how Metzger is on a separate
water system, which made it almost impossible to merge.
• Commissioner Bonn also wanted to know if Metropolitan Service District
had any responsibility with water. Mr. Santee replied no they do not.
• John Butler, NPO #1 Chairperson, felt he was at a disadvantage as he
did not have a copy of the addendum. He wanted more time to see what
types of changes had been made.
• Bob Bledsoe, representing NPO #3, stated that the Commission had
received a copy of their proposed changes, however, these were done
before staff had made additional changes.
• Commissioner Speaker stated he had problems with multiple
presentations. He wanted to know when this element could be
reconsidered to give Mr. Santee time to work with staff so we could
have current information.
• Discussion followed on how to handle execution of this element.
• Commissioner Speaker moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to continue
the public hearing on Saturday, December 11, 1982 at 1:30 P.M.
Motion carried by unanimous vote of Commissioners present.
• The Housing element would be heard at a public hearing on Thursday,
December 9, 1982, which would only consist of an overview of the
Housing Element and public input.
• Bob Bledsoe, NPO Representative, informed the Commission that NPO #3
had submitted numerous changes regarding housing policies pertaining
to policies in the Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies.
• Commissioner Bonn expressed his concern that there would be enough
time for staff to work with Mr. Santee. Staff said there would be
sufficient time for the public hearing on Saturday, December 11, 1982.
• Staff was requested to have current copies of the Public Facilities
and Services document available Wednesday, December 8, 1982 for pick
up at City Hall.
• Meeting Adjourned: 11:08 P.M. Y
if if
/ , /I . Anst.of
Diane Jeld- . s, Planning Secretary
ATTEST:
4 ,fiCAK&.L_l
Cliff S■/- -e' er, arming Comm. Vice-President
(003OP
PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CAFal,
3®
Hate �01 �
Frank Tepedino
Clifford Speaker
Don Moen IV
Mark Christen
T:41141V Itt.)tie fir
Bonnie Owens
Roy Borer: , p
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON,
1
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss.
1, .. _ . . . John W. Marling
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher 9f-_th6
Ti and
-- ---�� Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined
Tigard
by ORS 193.010 and 193.020,published at Feeset O re,in the aforesaid county and
state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was
published in the entire issue of said , spaper for _ t?'?O _ successive and
consecutive weeks in the following iss. `4._ _November 25,1982
(signat re) -
;Subscribed and sworn to befor - «is _.......29 _.____-.f day of--.—_--
November._ 1982
r
ri/Z. I
Notary Public of Oregon
My commission expires 'ebruary 24_—_ 19--_86
1
U
...
■
i
,
„
,
1
,,,..,_,..'"--t:v„.„'.7#.'ll.AW.,,,„.„Pip.ttiorig_4= ,:..';:',
This legal notice appwrkse,i1L.,s't",..,",-,;','„AR.,', ''''' 4.,:rA 'or' :,)Page'clrtils is
the corrected notice4I'v''il
l
'4°3' itiltkle-EiiiIIII4e46OTIti,'''"'- ' '
. , .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tigard Planning Commission will
eaadllet Public Bearings On Tuesday, 'Wednmday and Thuraday (Friday and
saturdsy if netinsary)December 7.8,and 0(10 and ii,if neef3SgarA=1662 at
..„,,......„.. ..,. .. in.. ......_,_ = . = . . , _ _ _ _
_
Foivtgar Jil-40-g g sellout--Lecture ROOM,168506,1C Walnut*rdet,TIP-
,
Or81I. „Ps St 7:30 R111.(Saturday meeting would begin at.P.'30p.in.),to consider the
I
1011bwing: ' ' * '
,
5.1 EIGREOREOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS APPOINT-
MONTS'WPO 1,2&6 -
, A request hy, various citizens to be appointed as meatballs to
,
,Nehadecerhooti Planning groat tionS nalaher 1,3.and 6.
5.2 SLIETUVISION'S 7.82 PETE SANZEN NPO,*1:5, '
,
A request uy peti'Aurseu to auhottriuu trum,iu1S'totatOtt,441.1AOroo
. ' tete 10.8.104:4 elamily hill/ding Tois eta.'4';'.4:'';''' -to*7'4114 aft IL
••
. each.The zoning dui let:ion ill 114 Siogl —;'.",tly ThttPlawDesig-
1,
nation is R-7 Single Family,The proper*t446,ouatettal.,:99:10$3v.
riteDuoutu(wash.Co.Tax Map 281 1 ltiA lot ,,_' ff(jrUhdloo.. '
,
CPA 7-82,COMPREll'ENSWE,PLAN REPORT7.,AIR,VATIEt AND
2.• :.
5.4 CPA 8-82 C.OMPRETIENSP/E PLAN RE'INiatt ECONOMY'
,
0,62 COMPREEENS1VE'PLAN R,EPOR',1% P11#.14C PAOLI-
,
r,.
TIES AND SERWCF..5.pod
s
..-:
(t 10.83 COMPRENENSIVE PEAN ItEpIETT:NATIEta,PEA- .
, sTIIRES AND OPEN SPACE ._,_'' _,_:__ _
,.
.i:. 5.7 ', ', 0.A.V.,112 COMPREEENSWE PLAN REptiRr TitANSPORTA. ,
'''
.
kW.,f zEll.9 1982.
CM 1,,-fi2 c 4.PR EENZWP PLAI,ItEFORP 11014q1NO.
-
5,3 ' CPA 1$42.:ctutiAPlitigg0.40.PLAN REPORT: URRANIZATION; ,-
..
! 5.4 ,'. ,t4,.%14.62 tjOMPRP4tii.'143Pria PLAN REPOR'L FINDDIGS,VOLI. .'
,
AND IMPLPAWENTATION sigAmtEs,
,,. ,
.,
!.! .E .-...z.,,it 3 1usi. . ' ..
„
..., 5.1. ' 'tEIA 1" ',Z CtMIVARENSIvE PLAN,MAP: ,.
:.2 5.2 ZC 10,82,OPPICIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; and map (goer -..
t
ROA 042 TIGARD COA4MUNTrif DEVELOPMENT CODE. .
, , ,
304'..".4.Pat. .„.,..,., ma. . .,
..;
1;.,I:'47 1:',,i:IT ne,..,eft
,
' The.daelgaa-isitImPlatiiiin:fteininiselon faritetW5..indOnteynO,PhICkidtk .
4
•
- be final unless eppealetto the T2187 coundt:.- l ',';a'%%,..;:'
-
,
The decision of thA pleitu_. 1t4•COInmitaskalOr idi Other item aiRiv,64114 be ,
,
recommendations"; tin4 City eguuto.
..,
nirther informitthilaAhhat theRe Pahgette011,11,1081,he eht#11.,., Otkra the .
,
Planning Dtreetar nt44745'tit Mit 4110,,,Ilaft,rf4 004.07223 elis*;4414 030- -
,.., .
. Copies 61 the'VOMP11EEENS/VEIRE4A0jiatIOn:010:011.iiiittwdocu- .
meats are also avellabie tor'testi*et itiit*Ttiottpii*0.404iii„ ,. ,.1 ,
,
written eummentustre micutteasit plea*,Stkult*fl A cookoxgatg to the ..,
. .
Plant:411M Direeter et 00,4146464101*/11;., ' -
. , ',''044tiii,i tgi *At1l44' ate
TT6630—PdiSt - .. ..,
...
,.
,
,
..
...
,
...:
,
.,
,.
,
,
„
•
_____
DATA �
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING, TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME
and note their address, on this sheet. (Please Print your name)
ITEM/bESCRIPTION: 6
---/------------1/2-P-41-1142F14"2148"
PROPONENT , (For) OPPONENT (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
.a
.
I
PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL
MEETING
Date / 7 I2 P/
y
Frank Tepedino 1 `) V �
Clifford Speaker
I,
Don Moen L
Mark Ch isten _ -
Bonnie Owens
Roy Bonn
r-
,
r
P
11
DATE bp 7 _24
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEII} NAME
and note their address, on this sheet.' (Please Print your name)
ITEM/DESCRIPTION: 5. 3 C pf4 a* 7 -9 04
c.• ' IL L , " __MagedetS
PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against)
Na e, Address and Affiliation k, Name, Address and Affiliation
1 it
X d r
7 . •'•-• •
L, 7. IA) a
hAt)+
("'n
7€"54 ,3 (-)&11 4/•,x5c€,Ae--(1541,-,
•
•
,•
•
DATE / 73`g
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME
and note their address. on this sheet.: (Please P int your name)
ITEM 1tESCRIP.TION 4 8 Q
1
E-C.Oorrt
1
...._
PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
-. (9-64 ae. ! w r'... s r a
r9(nY1 -t J\J ' 0 r
0,,O;g ,00 --- ,.- , , '
.
•
1.
t
1
1
DATE ( -s,
11Pu
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIL} NAME
and note their address on this sheet. (Please Print your name).
ITEM ADESCRIPTION: • a.
PA to ee
• -pckau.Q._ petvoitzrts.:5 ono__
Cueviaers
—
PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against)
mmommillimw
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
1D73 5/1,0 7e.6 77 r. X LOATre DAS7ei c7
410. 1717e4
• -tk„,e,
• k •
arAw
/
r
•
1 ,
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 1, 1982
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: NPO Membership Appointments
The NPO Membership Interview Team met;,to interview prospective
-.: members of NPO's 1, -3 and 6 . Three people were interviewed:
NAME ADDRESS NPO
Michael A. Smith 11645 S.W. Cloud Ct. 3
David C. Atkinson 10460 S.W. Century Oak Drive 6
Carolyn Eadon 13645 S.W. Steven Ct. 1
Each of these applicants live within the Tigard City limits.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The NPO Membership Interview Team recommends that the Planning Commission
forward the names of these three people to the City Council for membership
approval to the NPO' s noted.
6y /10;//e-e- _ 4"Po 6
i.�
Ar-
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: That are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, enviroh-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
. of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
•
NA ME JLi-Y I fLC• ,A f k'l k c c ADDRESS . C_Af y ie y M* D.4.
li 4 , 2 g7: 3 •
• TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) Rtes.) 3 t� d
PRESENT OCCUPATION / e 1 /1? 6 6 •
• FIRM NAME, •
•
' HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA?_.
•
HAVE YOU BEEN.INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? "ji/k'i '4.., •
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: Cly�/ /�1 f¢!tl ��G4.1B�Y1/1 .�
ie - ' ' Aiej) / f9l Q%�r' COQ, r1� � �, ; C '
Lf
dal if 4
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMUER OF AN NPO? 4 '''
f •
e: f ,!
.s :u - Iv' e-,J y.i. i
, a. .E'• - "4„,./ l«. i 4/,m .
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: „ Ljjf
• DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER 6 3 7-• i/ e W.
VI V
Li, -56)- riECE .
Ate
00T 3 7982,
NPO APPLICATION
ClY4FT/GilR
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
•
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood,. including., but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, .environ-
rental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
• of specific project plans; to'keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
• neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the .
vies of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
•
NAME ;:/ /i ADRE / .5" Cam G ' •7" ^ ''•
- TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) 2a7',/.-•'t.76142 (Res.) G`f i'%'I S71 7 • . . •
PRESENT OCCUPATION % l Z a7W7 - �.. ••
FIRM NAME �_�(•U`4/6,5/0.V' A. iei sue/6.,-A,az.o -
y • ROW LONG HAVE YOU. BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? ? rec •
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? . / - .h `
•
NAVE YOU BEEN,INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? ,tia •
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: � ,r- �
• '
•
WHAT
DO •YO
U EEL YOU CAN OFFER � ..
._ F C.A O FER AS A MENDER OF AN b'PO. /�. '��:`P'" ,�;�`�7sr��„�,�tr`•
��yE Cr�Nve r fora If .5• % �4.4ri e-
7f/ �, 0/1,661 -4--ast //49
. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
,
.
•
DAYTIME 1ELEPHO`3 VUJ3k 2 / — :7J � a
• 3
-7771H
r' 4 .�*
. ' V
. N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: that are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, envirott--
. mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
. of specific project plans; to'keep the neighborhood informed; to seek •
• neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the -
vitws of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
•
• PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELO'Y
rin£ £�?1 Y I"rant-. b AIiDRESS O_/5• �r < %l t%/� (r •
1•
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.). • • •__-(Res.) c'C' _,SS S (e-•
• PRESENT OCCUPATION -f-f ,, ,i fF. •
•
FIRM NAME
4 ,.. • ' HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM •
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? . ' •
HAVE YOU BEEN.INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? / 'cL
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT: '
• • •
WHAT DO YOU PEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MENDER OF AN NPO? )
f
�jL/
•
• � /
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS f / I .
�, � MENTS f., ,,,,, 1, ,/- -/ /f ,. :J �7<.�,�
�, J c:
a
' y -
DAYTIME '1'r1,>;pI10\F. IvuM6 R (,.^fir ,`! l'`' (r' 1," ,a,..
d c4r �, ✓ YV -2''/<<-
Al
MEMORANDUM
December 7, 1982
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Department of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: Suggested revisions to Air, Water, and Land Resources
Comprehensive Plan Element Report (CPA 7-82) .
The following are suggested language changes for the proposed
policies. Staff believes that these proposed policy changes
better reflect the City' s responsiblity regarding Goal # 6 :
Air, Water and Land Resources Quality.
1. POLICY 4 .1. 1 THE CITY SHALL:
A. MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TIGARD'S AIR QUALITY
AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND AGENCIES TO
REDUCE AIR POLLUTIONS WITHIN THE PORTLAND - VANCOUVER AIR
QUALITY MAINTENANCE AREA. (AQMA) ;
B. WHERE APPLICABLE, REQUIRE A STATEMENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE
AGENCY, THAT ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS CAN BE MET, PRIOR TO
THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL; AND
C. APPLY THE MEASURES DESCRIBED IN THE DEQ HANDBOOK FOR
"ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ELEMENTS OF OREGON LOCAL COMPRE-
HENSIVE LAND USE PLANS II TO LAND USE DECISIONS HAVING THE
POTENTIAL TO AFFECT AIR QUALITY.
2 . POLICY 4. 3.1
THE CITY SHALL:
A. REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSALS LOCATED IN A NOISE CONGESTED
AREA OR A USE WHICH CREATES NOISE IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICABLE
STANDARDS TO INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING INTO THE SITE PLAN:
1. BUILDING PLACEMENT ON THE SITE IN AN AREA WHERE
THE NOISE LEVELS WILL HAVE A MINIMAL IMPACT; or
2. LANDSCAPING AND OTHER TECHNIQUES TO LESSEN NOISE
IMPACTS TO LEVELS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
LAND USES.
B. COORDINATE WITH DEQ IN ITS NOISE REGULATION PROGRAM AND
WILL APPLY THE DEQ LAND USE COMPATIBLITY PROGRAM.
C. WHERE APPLICABLE REQUIRE A STATEMENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE
AGENCY (PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL) THAT
ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS CAN BE MET.
AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
TIGARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 1982
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION
Wilbur Bishop - Mayor Frank Tepedino - President
John Cook Cliff. Speaker
Tom Brian Donald Moen
Nancie Stimler Richard Helmer
Ken Scheckla Mark Christen
Roy Bonn
Bonnie Owens
Deane Leverett
Phil Eden
•
PROJECT STAFF
Bob Jean - City Administrator
William A. Monahan - Director of Planning and Development
Jeremy Coursolle - Associate Planner
Liz Newton Associate Planner
Frank Currie Public Works Director.
Path Martin -- Word Processing
DRAFT: For Discussion Purposes Only
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
AIR QUALITY 2
NOISE 11
WATER 17
LAND RESOURCES 20
FINDINGS, POLICIES,
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 22
BIBLIOGRAPHY 27
i
Page 1
INTRODUCTION
This report provides a technical background inventory and problem
identification for the Tigard Comprehensive Plan in relation to LCDC Statewide
Planning Goal #6 - Air, Water and Land Resouces Quality.
The purpose of Goal #6 is: "To maintain and improve the quality of the air,
water and land resources quality of the state.
All waste and process discharges from future development,
when combined with such discharge from existing
developments shall not threaten to violate, or violate
applicable state or federal environmental quality statutes,
rules and standards. With respect to air, water and land
resources of the applicable air sheds and river basins
described or included in state environmental quality
statutes, rules, standards and implementation plan, such
discharges shall not (1) exceed the carry capacity of such
resources, considering long range needs; (2) degrade such
resources; or (3) threaten the availability of such
resources."
In this goal the words "waste and process discharges" refer to "solid waste,
thermal, noise, atmosphere or water pollutants, contaminants, or products
therefrom. Also included in this definition are indirect sources of air
pollution which results in emissions of air contaminants for which the state
has established standards." (Source: Statewide Planning Goal #6). All point
and nonpoint pollution sources and areas are catalogued and monitored by the
State Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) which has responsibility to
ensure that the carrying capacity of the area resource is not exceeded. 1
Jurisdiction Coordination
•
ORS 197.150 and DEQ's Coordination Program approved by LCDC require that
DEQ-issued permits, facility plans, and construction grants for new or
expanded facilities will not be approved or become effective until DEQ
received evidences from the responsible local planning authorities that the
proposal is compatible with local land use provisions.
Applicants for DEQ permits, grants, etc. must obtain a local "Statement of
Compatibility." This statement issued by the local planning agency (City of
Tigard Department of Planning and Development) must certify that the proposal •I
is compatible with LCDC the Statewide Planning Goals. If DEQ receives a
negative local statement of compatibility they will not take action; the
permit or approval will not be issued or if the permit was issued
conditionally already, it will not become effective.
• If the local statement of compatibility is positive, DEQ will test the
proposed action for compatibility with state and federal environmental quality
requirements and relevant provisions of Goal 166 and Goal #11 (Public
Facilities and Services).
•
Page 2
This coordinating system essentially places the responsibility for evaluating
land use decisions for any proposed DEQ action under local control and places
the responsibility for evaluating the more technical environmental issues
under DEQ control.
AIR QUALITY*
Tigard is within Portland's airshed described as the Portland Air Quality
Maintenance Area (AQMA) which is a designated non-attainment area. Within th,�
Portland AQMA, the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) is the lead agency
responsible for pollution reduction programs aimed at carbon monoxide (CO) and
photochemical oxidants (Ox), of which the primary element of concern is ozone
(03). The responsibility of pollution reduction programs with total
suspended particles (TSP) is the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ).
MSD and DEQ inventory pollutants and make recommendations for controls and
strategies to the Air Quality Advisory Committee, composed of representatives
from the jurisdictions, interests groups and the public at large within the
AQMA.
Ambient Air Standards
Federal and state standards for air quality have been developed for various
pollutants consistent with health and welfare concerns. (See Table I)
Federal standards are established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and are divided into two (2) classes, primary and secondary.
Primary standards are designed to protect the public health with a builtin
margin of safety. Secondary standards are somewhat stricter and are designed
to protect the public welfare from adverse effects such as visibility
reduction, soiling, material damage and nuisances. When the secondary
standard is identical to the primary standard, it has been determined that the
primary standard will also be protective of welfare. (See Table I)
Air Pollution
Major air pollutants include total suspended particulates, sulfur dioxide,
carbon monoxide, photochemical oxidants, nitrogen dioxide, and hydrocarbons.
Total suspended particulates consist of solid and liquid particles of soot,
dust, aerosols, and fumes ranging from 0.1 to 100 microns and averaging about
2 microns in size (1 micron = 1/2, 540"). Suspended particulates originate in
combustion sources, motor vehicles, industry process losses, dust, field and
slash burning, and natural sources such as ocean spray and wind-raised dust.
Suspended particulates aggravate chronic lung disease, heart and lung disease
symptoms; and causes damage to various types of materials as well as
visibility reduction.
Sulfur dioxide is a colorless, pungent, irritating gas from oil and coal
combustion and industry process losses. It aggravates asthma, heart and lung
disease, particularly for the elderly; irritates lungs; is corrosive to metals
and marble; and causes plant damage.
*Source: 1981 Oregon Air Quality Annual Report, Department of Environmental
Quality.
TABLE 1 Page 3
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oregon
Federal Standards
Primary Secondary Oregon
Pollutant AveraQina Time (Health) (Welfare) Standard
3* 3 3
Total Annual Geometric 75 ug/m 60 ug/m 60 ug/m
Suspended Mean
Particulate 24 hours(1) 260 ug/m3 150 ug/m3 150 ug/m3
Monthly (2) - - 100 ug/m3
Ozone(4) 1 hour 235 ug/m3(3) 235 ug/m3(3) 235 ug/m3(3)
Carbon Monoxide 8 hours(1) 10 mg/m3" 10 mg/m3 10 mg/m3
1 hour (1) 40 mg/m3 40 mg/m3 40 mg/m3
Sulfur Dioxide Annual Arithmetic 80 ug/m3 - 60 ug/m3
Average
24 hours(1) 365 ug/m3 - 260 ug/m3
3 hours - 1300 ug/m3 1300 ug/m3
Nitrogen Annual Arithmetic 100 ug/m3 100 ug/m3 100 ug/m3
Dioxide Average
Hydrocarbons 3 hours(1) 160 ug/m3. 160 ug/m3 160 ug/m3
(Nonmethane) (6-9 a.m.)
Lead Monthly - - 3 ug/m3
Calendar Quarter 1 .5 ug/m3 1 .5 ug/m3 -
rs + mmszemm
NOTES:
• Micrograms of pollutant per cubic meter of air.
ar Milligrams of pollutant per cubic meter of air.
(1) Not to be exceeded on more than one day per year.
(2) 24-hour average not to be exceeded for more than 15 percent of
the samples in a calendar month.
(3) A statistical standard, but basically not to be exceeded
more than an average one day per year based on the most
recent three years of data.
. (4) The state standard was revised on January 22, 1982 .
Source: Air Quality Annual Report - 1981 , DEQ.
Page 4
Carbon monoxide is a colorless, ordorless gas which is highly toxic. It comes
from incomplete combustion sources, most frequently from motor vehicles.
Carbon monoxide interferes with the blood's ability to carry oxygen, causing
heart difficulties; it also reduces lung capacity and impairs mental abilities.
Ozone is a colorless, odorless, toxic gas. Ozone arises from photochemical
processes in the atmosphere by reaction between oxides of nitrogen and
hydrocarbons in the presence of sunlight, and is generally a consequence of
industrial and combustion sources and motor vehicles. It can cause eye
irritation, damage to lung tissue and lung functions, material damage and
plant damage.
Nitrogen dioxide is a reddish-brown gas toxic in high concentrations. It is
formed by conversion of nitric oxide from motor vehicles, combustion sources
and industrial sources. It increases chronic bronchitis and irritates lungs.
Hydrocarbons are a large family of compounds consisting of hydrogen and
carbons. They are generated by motor vehicles, evaporated fuel losses,
industry and combustion process. Hydrocarbons actively participate in oxidant
formation and cause plant damage. Methane, a particular hydrocarbon, is
produced naturally by the decay of organic matter and is not significant in
oxidant formation.
While Oregon has a reputation for having a relatively clean environment, there
are four areas of the state designated as not being in attainment with federal
air quality standards for one or more pollutant. The Portland-Vancouver area
is one of these designated areas. The Portland-Vancouver Air Quality
Maintenance Area (AQMA) is not in attainment with the 8-hour carbon monoxide
standard and the oxone standard and contains subareas that are not in
attainment with the secondary total suspended particulate standard.
However, for most of western Oregon, air quality in 1981 was the best it has
years. Total suspended particulate,in . six yea p P r carbon monoxide and lead
levels
declined, although h one severe and abnormal heat wave during the year
caused several violations of the ozone standard.
TABLE II
Status of Attainment Plans for Areas
Exceeding Federal Air Quality Standards
Area Pollutant
Total Suspended Carbon
Particulate Monoxide Ozone
Portland-Vancouver AQMA.
Plan Adoption Date 12-80 Expected 7-82 Expected 7-82
Projected Attainment Date 1987 1985 1987
Source: Air Quality Annual Report - 1981, Oregon State Department of
Environmental Quality.
MI
i
0
rt
IL
GI-
1
Banks .;•, - L. .r ;t-?
rt
North t 4'
�; _ Plain :r -. j •; f ( �, Jr{•. tr 3
rt
J ' :: 4' Troutdale _ - - o.
_ Corne l i us .? } F J .•/ (}•err 1: --4:'..--.-- � 1 �r R �-z-t --
i ck 1 4jpr01f� 1 �r� r +ri*�. err rf,^° �. •-r ,
lillls _ tT(}rl r r ,
{ \ l ' } r Portland E`r r; �'�' tw• #r_ c co
r .5
--f G -Y-•r�,�' ----'1 .... .4::-.- i;•'"�`r , ti..-V,14.:4:-:.~`:`.-::!./.)-'7-1-.r ...r.`<"::::Gresham —
+ f { !
On - 1 i;2-1--:::::%":':-..,
.ice /4. (.1 ! (. :I.-x.4' �1 J--F• +- 1' -Y`^✓•"/:1^rJy-.�Y J -Y— .J ` (- 3':-.:::i:::',::--:•ii.**Ai...::
`� Gaston { ^ �` { :, Ni lWaukie �*, \k- ---
lLLL��� jm
,.- .tam ------•.;-::::::-:::;-:',:'---=7:` y,./;:l Tigard Lake `t �r,01.
! l•--:::::::::::•/...-:",....-r :1 ri Q
_ ^t � a 5 Si'!£rWOOd �• 1`Z�,`� �::l�6fesC •q�4[�'r� •� _ !'• r �
:: - }t : s �r - -
�t
:1•.
Oregon City
,
i
J i:r
-1;"
:g ;..,. .
s —.1
•
Page 5
In the Portland AQMA, the decrease in total suspended 'particulate levels was
not accompanied by a decrease in fine particulate levels. From an analysis of
meteorological conditions, it appears that 1981 was an average ventilation
year. The major decrease in total suspended particulate was in coarse
particulate, and the major source of coarse particulate in Portland is soil
and road dust. It is highly suspected that reduced amounts of wintertime road
sanding and much better pickup of the material occurred. Some residual effect
from the previous year of intense volcanic ashfall cleanup may also have been
significant.
Carbon monoxide levels at most sites in the State showed a distinct
improvement over 1980 levels, both in average levels and in the number of days
violations were recorded. The single most important factor in the improved
carbon monoxide levels is the reduction in tailpipe emissions from new
automobiles as a result of the Federal Motor Vehicle Emission Control Program.
Meterology and Air Pollution Episodes
During normal conditions air quality is maintained as a balance between
emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere and the atmosphere's ability to
disperse or remove these pollutants. Occassionally, atmospheric conditions
stagnate, causing an imbalance which may lead to elevated levels of pollutants
depending on the strength and length of the stagnation period.
The National Weather Service attempts to predict and track periods of poor
atmospheric conditions by issuing Air Stagnation Advisories (ASA's) when such
conditions are expected to persist for a significant period of time.
In the event air pollution levels exceed prescribed limits, and other criteria
are met, the Department declares an air pollution episode. Various stages of
episodes may be declared depending on the levels measured. These stages range
from Forecast, which is based solely on the issuance of an ASA, through Alert,
Warning, and Emergency, which are based on specific concentrations of air
pollutants. At each stage, certain activities are carried out as described in
the Department's Emergency Action Plan. These activities range from an
internal watch through public advisories to the ability to curtail industrial
and public activities if pollutant levels continue to rise to Emergency levels.
Air Quality Trends
An often asked question about air quality is, "Is it getting better or
worse?" On the surface, this would appear an easy question to answer but a
closer look reveals many problems and pitfalls. Air quality data rarely shows
an absolute trend, each value greater or less than the preceding one, but
rather shows variations with distinct time intervals. Some periods of time
are expected to show higher values of certain pollutants than others. For
example, carbon monoxide values are typically higher during weekdays than on
weekends, and particulate values vary seasonally due to, among other things,
space heating requirements. In the midst of this periodic variation a trend
analysis must be able to distinguish a true or significant trend over a
sufficient period of time to make a viable statement regarding the long term
trend of the data.
TABLE III Page 6
Air Quality Trends*
and
Number of Days Exceeding Standards
for Selected Oregon Cities
TSP CO 03
City TSP Trends CO Trends 03 Trends
Albany 0 4 -°
Baker 0 --
Bend 1 -- 11 -- "
Coos Bay 0 —
Eugene- 1 0 3
Springfield
Grants Pass 0 --
Klamath Falls 0
La Grande
L
El
ake Oswego
Medford
Milwaukie • e 0 NM
Oregon City 0
Pendleton 4 --
• Portland 5
Roseburg 0 --i En
' Salem 0 �� Q t
The Dalles 0 ---w -- —
White City .
Legend: TSP Total Suspended Particulate .
CO Carbon Monoxide
03 Ozone
-- Not monitored.
Exceeded only annual standard.
Trends based on most recent 5 years of data. Pre-1979 ozone
values were adjusted down by 22.5% to reflect a change in the
calibration method. Trends are reported only if significant
at the 90% confidence level.
ii. Not enough years of data to compute trends.
t Measured levels increasing.
i Measured levels decreasing.
•—.- No significant trends.
El Designated Nonattainment Area for the pollutant noted.
Source: Air Quality Annual Report -- 1981 , DEQ.
TABLE IV Page 7
Number of Days Air Stagnation Advisories Were Issued
by the National WeaTher S rvice
Willamette
Southwest Valley
Interior except Eastern ASA-Daysrat
Year Valley Eugene Eugene Portland; Oregon Total
1972 2 6 6 6 6 6
1 1973 4 3 2 3 0 7
19714 11 16 16 16 0 17
1975 26 1 1 1 0 26
1976 414 20 26 17 1 44
1977 23 5 6 5 15 29
1978 15* 13 17 13 0 20
1979 11* 17 17 13 0 21
1980 43 21 21 8 0 41
1981 ____ 1Z_ 18 12_ 16
10 Year
Average 21 .5 11 .9 13.0 9.4 2.2 25.0
s Includes one ASA that extended only to Roseburg.
*! One ASA-DAY is defined as an ASA in at least one of the identified areas.
TABLE V
Maximum Pollutant Concentrations During
Air. Pollution Episodes Declared by the DEQ
a
Total Suspended Carbon
Particulate _ 1±ynoxide Ozone
Maximum # Maximum # Maximum f
Concentration Concentration Concentration
Area Ye. Dates uW/m3 Dates _1AgL213. Dates up./m3
Portland 1975 None Od None 07/23-07/25 2544
1976 None 11/30-12/06 17.7 None
1977 None None 08/08-08/18 4504
1978 None Node 08/03-08/04 300'
08/08-08/09 294
1979 None 11/10-11/11 19.9 07/16-07/18 333
1980 05/30-06/03" 509 12/06-12/21 24.1 None
06/15-06/23" 3334 None
06/27-07/01" 654
10/17-10/19" 328
12/16-12/18 267
. . - _1281 .Qnsr _. ._.__ ,None
/ Values in this table were reported as unverified during the
episode and may not correspond to values listed elsewhere in this 1
summary.
Of None means standards were not violated during an episode during
the year.
1 Pre-1979 ozone levels were measured with a different calibration
method. The pre-1979 levels should be reduced by 20-25% for
comparison with 1979 and later values.
44 High levels are due to volcanic ash.
Source: Air Quality Annual Re99rt - 1981 , Oregon State Department of
Environmental Quality.
Page 8
To further complicate matters, many non-periodic occurrences can affect a
trend analysis. Changes in traffic patterns near a carbon monoxide monitor
could lead to erroneous trend predictions unless the change was noted.
Meteorology and industrial activity due to economic conditions can severely
affect air quality data. Since these effects are quite difficult to
quantitatively account for, most trend analyses point out their existence as a
caution to the reader.
The air quality trends presented in Table III represent statistically
significant trends in measured air quality without regard to mitigating
circumstances such as meteorology or economy. They are based on annual
average data collected over the period 1977-81 and are reported only if
significant at the 90% confidence level.
Wood Heating and Air Quality
The most rapid growing source of particulate air pollution in Oregon is
residential wood space heating.
Airshed studies have identified wood heating as a significant source of
uncontrolled pollutants and a major cause of violations of the state and
federal ambient air quality standards in Portland.
Currently, more than 50% of Oregon's households use wood for some space
heating. Heating with wood is expected to continue as more and more
individuals try to offset accelerating home heating costs of conventional
sources of heat. Unfortunately, a wood stove can emit 224 times more
particulate than an oil furnace and up to 457 times more than natural gas for
the same heat value.
IF You ARE BURNING PROPERLY YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE.
44 . .'; #. r 1..:40 ;"*". V.9"+ '' $ '' 8ft"' "...i..
r
7
. , •-.:9- :.Ir.., •.• . . 444-: 1 :Ilk g
-�
N
0
0
.0
RIGHT. WRONG.
A hot, clean burning fire. A smouldering, damped-down fire.
Page 9
This accelerating trend is using wood for home heating results in large
quantities of fine particulate and carbon monoxide being emitted from
woodstoves and fireplaces six months of the year at essentially ground level
in many residential neighborhoods. Wood smoke contains very small particles,
the majority of which are within a size range that can evade the body's
natural filtering mechanisms and cause health effects when pollutant levels
accumulate during periods of poor ventilation. Relatively high concentrations
of these respirable particles have been measured in densely populated urban
areas. For example, respirable wood heating impacts in a Portland residential
neighborhood have exceeded 60 ug/m3 on ;a 24-hour basis during the winter of
1981-82.
For those households that heat with wood, the DEQ has been recommending the
following:
1. Fully weatherize and insulate all dwellings. These measures will help
reduce the amount of wood used for space heating or eliminate the need
to burn wood. For households that plan to heat with wood, we highly
recommend that you insulate before installing a wood burning appliance.
2. Select a wood stove that is properly sized for the area to be heated.
Oversized wood heating appliances will put out too much heat, causing
the operator to choke down the combustion air supply to decrease heat
output; this increases creasote buildup and causes more particulates
to be released.
3. Avoid burning wood on poor air quality days or during moderate
temperatures; if possible, use conventional heat sources during these
periods.
4. Follow good stove operating practices: How you burn makes a big
difference in •terms of efficiency, safety and emissions released.
5. Allow adequate combustion air into the firebox. Restriction of the
air supply substantially increases the quantity of pollutants emitted
from woodstoves.
6. Burn with a hot fire when starting the stove. A great deal of
pollutants are given off in the first 30 to 45 minutes of a burn cycle
and when reloading the firebox. High firebon temperatures are
required for complete combustion. Smoldering fires cause heat loss in
the form of usable chemical energy going up the chimney.
7. Burn well-seasoned dry wood. Wet wood is less energy efficient and
may cause more creosote buildup.
8. Don't overload the firebox. A small charge of wood arranged to
maximize air circulation helps to obtain more complete combustion and
• reduced emissions.
9. Use pieces of wood that are between 3-1/2 and 5 inches in diameter for
the most efficient, least polluting burn.
U
Page 10
10. Do not burn plastics, garbage or coal. These give off additional
hazardous or toxic gases and pollutants. Indoor air quality may also
be affected.
11. For safety, maintain your appliance in good operating condition.
Check for smoke leaks and clean the flue and chimney regularly.
12. Compare the cost of wood heating: When all the costs of wood heating
are accounted for, in many cases it will be found that it is still
cheaper to use conventional sources of fuel.
At present, the DEQ is prohibited from regulating home heating devices,
including wood stoves and fireplaces. However, the Department is considering
several options to resolve the problem of growing emissions from household
wood heating. These are:
1. Conduct a statewide voluntary wood stove emission rating and labeling
program. This would provide the consumer with a means of comparing
appliances based on their actual test performance.
2. Provide a consumer pollution control tax credit for installing new or
replacement clean-burning stoves.
3. Conduct an Emission Performance Certification Program. This would
allow only clean-burning appliances to be sold.
These options are preliminary only and subject to revisions. They are being
evaluated as to their feasibility, public acceptability, cost, and energy
environmental effectiveness, and and
would
require legislative authority to
implement.
Goals and Objectives for the Department of Environmental Quality
1. Administer an effective air quality program.
2. Attain and maintain air quality standards statewide and prevent
significant deterioration of air quality in clean air areas.
3. Attain and maintain adequate data bases statewide.
4. 'Maintain control of point source emissions.
5. Develop, implement, and promote implementation of control strategies
for significant area source emissions.
6. Minimize impacts of field burning and slash burning smoke on air
quality.
7. Reduce automotive caused air pollution through operation of a periodic
inspection/maintenance program.
8. Promote better understanding of air quality issues through
communication with the public and other agencies.
Page 11
State Implementation Plan Activities
Although these strategies are directed towards the City of Portland, the
impacts affect Tigard as well as the entire Portland Metropolitan Area.
Portland-Vancouver AQMA (Oregon Portion) Carbon Monoxide Control Strategy
The City of Portland agreed with the Metropolitan Service District and DEQ to
take the lead in developing a carbon monoxide control strategy plan for the
region, since the carbon monoxide problem is largely confined to downtown
Portland. A draft plan was put together in 1981 with feedback from the
Portland Air Quality Advisory Committee. The control plan is expected to
enable the Portland area to meet the 8-hour carbon monoxide standard by 1985.
Portland-Vancouver AQMA (Oregon Portion) Ozone Control Strategy
In the fall of 1981, the DEQ and the Metropolitan Service District completed
work on a revised ozone analysis, based on 1980 data. Results of the analysis
indicate that controls on existing industrial sources adopted in 1980 plus a
continuation of present control programs on transporation sources, will be
more than sufficient to project attainment with the ozone standard by 1987.
Chief elements of the proposed control strategy are listed below.
1. Portland area biennial Auto Inspection and Maintenance program;
2. Committed transporation projects, with special emphasis on the
Banfield Light Rail Transit project; and
3. Existing Volatile Organic Compound Rules applied to existing
industrial sources.
To manage new industrial growth, the DEQ plans to utilize a surplus in
required emissions reductions as a growth cushion. Oregon and Washington
would share the growth cushion on an 85%--15% basis, respectively, because of
the interstate nature of the AQMA.
An ozone control strategy based on the above components was drafted in 1981.
A finalized control plan must be submitted to EPA for incorporation into the
Oregon State Implementation Plan by July, 1982.
NOISE*
Noise is more than just a nuisance. It constitutes a real and present danger
to people's health. Though we seem to adjust to noise after long periods of
exposure, the body still responds; and sometimes with extreme tension.
Feelings of annoyance and frustration may develop either from direct exposure
to noise or from an inability to communicate or relax when noise is present.
The body reacts to this stress with increased release of adrenalin,
constriction of blood vessels, and increased heart rate. Noise does not have
to be loud to bring on these responses. Noise well below the levels usually
associated with hearing damage can cause regular and predictable adverse
changes in the body.
*Source: Comprehensive Plan Noise Element Guidelines, Department of
Environmental Quality.
Page 12
Perhaps because annoyance and frustration are so commonplace in our lives we
tend to take noise pollution for granted, without realizing the effect it may
have on our lives. Conscientious planning for an improved quality of life -
must include measures to limit our exposure to noise pollution.
The purpose of this document is to assist those involved with the development
and review of the noise element of local comprehensive land use plans. These
guidelines explain the DEQ's role in statewide control of noise and provide
information on how a city, county or regional can ensure that the Statewide
Planning Goals are met with regard to noise pollution.
Noise is a waste or process discharge, and falls within the scope of Statewide
Planning Goal #6,, adopted by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development
Commission. Other goals are directly or indirectly related to the environment
and noise pollution, e.g. transportation, Goal #12. Transportation corridors
have a significant noise impact on surrounding noise sensitive living and use
areas, for instance, and most decisions concerning the amount and type of
housing needed for a community will indirectly have noise impact consequences
upon future residents.
The Oregon Legislature, when adopting the Noise Control Act of 1971, found
that noise at "unreasonable levels is as much a threat to the environmental
quality of life . . . and the health, safety and welfare of the people of this
state as is pollution of the air and waters . (ORS Chapter 467.) This
legislation authorized the DEQ, through the Environmental Quality Commission,
to adopt and enforce statewide standards of noise control.
Types of Noise Sources
The following is a breakdown of source areas perceived by DEQ as having
potential noise problems. This list is not all-inclusive, but merely points
out typical problem sources. It should be noted that the proximity of the
noise source to noise sensitive property is very important in evaluating any
specific noise source. Noise-sensitive property includes residences, motels,
• churches, hospitals, libraries and places where people normally sleep.
Potential noise sources in Tigard are:
1. Highways and freeways;
2. Local industrial and commercial facilities;
3. Construction equipment and activities;
4. Collector and local streets;
5. Railroad operations; and •
6. Residential sources (furnaces, air conditioners, barking dogs, loud
voices, and off-road vehicles), •
Page 13
Highway and Traffic Noise
Effective control of the undesirable effects of highway and traffic generated
noise requires a three-part approach: 1) source emission reduction; 2)
improved highway design; and 3) land use control.
The first two components are currently being addressed by private industry and
by federal and state agencies. The third area is traditionally an area of
local governmental responsibility.
Source emission reduction requires the development of quieter cars and
trucks. There is some probability that legislation will provide quieter cars
and trucks in the future; however, while significant progress is being made in
research to reduce vehicle engine and exhaust noise, tire design - the major
source of high speed traffic noise, may place limits on further improvements.
Thus, land use control will continue to be a crucial component of the
three-part approach to noise control. Local governments will continue to have
the responsibility for discouraging the development of noise-sensitive land
uses (such a homes and schools) in highway noise impacted areas and for
ensuring that any such development which does occur is planned to minimize the
adverse effects of noise.
The administrative techniques available to local governments fall into five
categories: zoning; other legal restrictions such as subdivision laws,
building, and health codes; municipal ownership or control of the land;
financial incentives for compatible use; and educational and advisory
municipal services.
Zoning can be a strong local control on new development, but has little
control over existing land uses. Zoning as a noise compatibility control
includes:
1. Exclusion of such typically incompatible uses as residences from a
noise-impacted area by allowing only industrial uses. This is a
simple and effective technique. However, such zoning needs to be
carefully studied since it may conflict with other plans for community
growth, and it may render the land worthless if no demand exists for
industrial land.
2. Regulation of development design or construction, such as limiting
building height or requiring buffer strips, noise barriers, and sound
insulating construction. This is usually effective, but often the
applicability of the requirements extends to buildings that do not
need the special construction techniques to be noise compatible.
3. Special development concepts such as cluster and planned development.
These forms of innovative zoning make possible developments with
significantiadvantages over the conventional subdivision.
eixklkd
OW-
Page 14
Municipal ordinances other than zoning can act as noise compatible land use
controls:
1. Subdivision or development standards can require acoustical site
planning of the development by berms and barriers.
2. Environmental impact statements can be required for new development
projects.
Of course, if the City owns the noise-impacted land, ' it can keep the land
vacant or ensure that it is developed with noise compatible uses. Relaxation
of enforcement of provl_ions of municipal regulation can, where legal, be used
as an incentive to obtain voluntary acoustical site design and construction
measures from developers and builders.
Additionally, city information services can be made available to builders and
developers through such things as an architectural review board, a city design
service, an acoustical information library, or a public information effort to
make the public aware of acoustical incompatibilities and their prevention.
Industrial and Commercial Noise
A basic problem in dealing with industrial and commercial uses is their
relationship to residential uses. Besides providing appropriate standards for
industrial uses, the utilization of techniques such as clustering and planned
developments for industrial areas should mitigate adverse environmental
impacts and land-use conflicts.
In areas where incompatible land uses already exist, strict adherence to DEQ
noise emission standard and utilization of the best available abatement
strategies and technologies is required.
New light industrial activities can generally minimize their effects on
surrounding land uses by means such as site planning, architectural design,
construction methods, and barrier construction. Techniques available for
shielding abutting development from noise impacts include:
1. Increasing the distance between the noise source and the noise
receiver;
2. Planning land uses such as parking lots, maintenance facilities, and
utility areas between the source and the receiver;
3. Locating barrier type buildings parallel to the noise source;
4. Orienting abutting development away from the noise source.
Heavy industrial activities are, by their nature, not extremely compatible
with less intensive land uses, particularly residences. Siting of heavy
industrial uses near residences, as seen in the case south of Hunziker Street
and west of Cherry Street, is an invitation of land use conflicts. To as
great an extent as possible, these industries should be segregated and
buffered from less intensive uses.
Page 15
Design criteria recommends that the outside daytime noise levels in a
residential areas should not exceed 50 dBa (45 dBa inside dwellings: a
maximum reduction of 20 dBa is possible by closing windows).
Noise Control and Standards
The Oregon Legislature has authorized the Department of Environmental Quality.
(DEQ) and the Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) to adopt and enforce
statewide standards for noise control. Standards presently adopted by Oregon
Administrative Rule (OAR) are contained in OAR 340-35-005 through 340-35-100
and are summarized as follows as they are related to the Tigard area:
1. All new motor vehicles sold within Oregon must meet maximum allowable
decibel limits. Vehicle categories include automobiles and light
trucks, motorcycles, buses, snowmobiles and medium and heavy trucks.
Racing vehciles are exempt from this rule (OAR 340-35-025).
2. In-use motor vehicle emission standards are established and referenced
to moving and stationary monitoring procedures. Road vehicles and
off-road recreational vehicles are included in this rule. Ambient
standards for off-road recreational vehicles impacting adjacent noise
sensitive property are also included in this rule (OAR 340-35-030).
3. Industrial and commercial noise sources must meet ambient noise
standards measured at the nearest "noise sensitive property". "Noise
sensitive property" includes residences, hospitals, schools, churches,
libraries and places where people normally sleep. The definition for
industry is very broad, but some activities are exempted for reasons
of lack of control technology, lack of an adequate standard or
preemption by federal regulations (OAR 340-35-035).
Industrial and commercial noise standards are based upon protection of
speech communication during the daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m. ) . and
protection of sleep at night (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). The standards are
written in statistical terms over a one hour sampling period. This
allows some variations in the noise level over time, but limits the
total acoustical energy during the one-hour sampling period.
City of Tigard's Noise Ordinance
At this time, the City does have a noise control ordinance in the Tigard
Municipal Code and is cited below.
Section 7.40.070 Noise. (a) No person shall operate a motor vehicle in
such a manner or at such a location as to cause the noise created by the
vehicle to cause the ambient noise level specified in subsection (c) of
this section, as measured at a point located twenty-five feet from the
noise-sensitive structure toward the noise source.
(b) Except as may be expressly allowed pursuant to the provisions of
Section 7.40.080, no person shall cause or permit noise to emanate from
property under his or her control so as to cause the ambient noise level
Page 16
at the nearest noise-sensitive property to exceed the levels set forth in
subsection (c) of this section, as measured at a point located twenty-five
feet from the noise-sensitive structure toward the noise source.
(c) Allowable noise limits are as follows:
Time Maximum noise level, dBa
7 a.m.--10 p.m. 60
10 p.m.-- 7 a.m. 55
•
(d) The restrictions imposed by subsections (a), (b) and (c) of this
section shall not apply to the following:
(1) Emergency equipment not operating on a regular or scheduled basis;
(2) Noise emanating from the Pacific Highway, Highway 1-217 and
Highway 1-5;
(3) Sounds originating on construction sites and reasonably necessary
to the accomplishment of work in progress; provided, however, that no
construction work may not be carried on between the hours of nine p.m.
and seven a.m. , except for bona fide emergencies where the pulic
health or safety is threatened or when a special permit, granted by
the City Council, has been first obtained. Any such special permit
may be granted by City Council only after first having held a hearing
and having otherwise followed the procedures contained in Chapter
18.84 of the Zoning Ordinance;
(4) Emergency repair equipment not operated on a regular or scheduled
basis;
(5) Lawn, garden or household equipment associated with the normal
repair, upkeep or maintenance of property.
(e) No persons shall operate within the City limits of the City of Tigard
a motor vehicle exhaust-braking system, commonly known as a "fake brake."
For the purposes of this subsection, the exceptions set forth in
subsection (d) of this section shall not apply, and this section shall be
read as an absolute prohibition of the operation of such motor vehicle
braking systems within the City of Tigard.
(f) For the purposes of this section, the term "ambient noise" means the
all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment, being usually
a composit of sounds from many sources, near and far. The term
"noise-sensitive property" means real property on which people normally •
sleep, and also includes schools, churches and public libraries.
(g) No person shall cause or permit noise to emanate from sound
amplifying equipment under his or her control so as to cause the ambient
noise level to exceed sixty dBa at any distance one hundred feet or more
from the source between the hours of seven a.m. and ten p.m. and
fifty-five dBa one hundred feet from the source between the hours of ten
p.m. and seven a.m. .
Page 17
WATER
Tigard is within the Tualatin River and the Fenno Creek drainage basins. The
major tributaries of the watercourses are Summer Creek, Ash Creek and Red Rock
Creek. All of these watercourses have varied flow levels based on the
seasonal imputs of moisture. The annual input of moisture is strongly
concentrated in the winter months and summers are normally dry. The Tualatin
River has the greatest seasonal variations in flow than any other river in the
Willamette Valley. About 90% of the annual flow occurs between the months of
November and April.
Most of the watercourses in Tigard are used by water fowl and wildlife. The
Tualatin River is used for recreational purposes as well.
Water Quality*
As surely as water runs downhill, a certain amount of topsoil is washed into
nearby streams every time it rains -- and in western Oregon it rains often.
Annual rainfall averages as high as 130 inches a year on the upper west slopes
of the Coast Range. From fields and forests and cities, whatever is on the
ground washes continuously down even the gentlest slopes as the waters seek
their level. Runoff from these "nonpoint sources," has impact on our water.
Urbanization brings new problems. Oil, rubber and lead from automobiles, mud
from construction sites and soot from heavy manufacturing areas, all settle on
highways and crosswalks and are washed from pavements into rivers and streams.
The water quality of the lower Tualatin River is rather poor by comparison
with most rivers in Oregon, but apparently this has always been the case.
The lowland Tualatin River and its lowland tributaries were never clear, cold
mountain streams. The combination of clay-silt beds, low summer flows, slow
meandering course, and warm summer temperatures naturally create a lower water
quality. One meaning of the Indian work Tualatin was "lazy and sluggish".
The Indians also referred to the Tualatin as the "green river" from its
abundant summer algea growth.
The population boom' in eastern Washington County after World War II brought
many small inadequate sewerage treatment plants on the lower tributaries of
the Tualatin River, namely Fenno Creek, Rock Creek and Beaverton Creek. By
the early 1970's the treated wastes from these plants contributed most of the
water in the streams. Fanno Creek, which had good trout fishing as late as
the 1940's and had once supplied crayfish to Portland's finest restaurants
became virtually an open sewer (90% treated effluent).
Several changes during the 1970's have improved water quality especially along
the urbanizing creeks (Fanno Creek in Tigard's case), but continued population
growth with its attendNntk increased sewage waste and urbanization <
gradually erasing these gains. (A,,
*Sources. Washington County Planning Department, Comprehensive Resource
Document, DEQ CFP Water Quality in Oregon,1980, .
Page 18
During the 1970's, nineteen small sewer treatement plants, located along Fanno
Creek, were removed from service and their flows diverted to the new U.S.A.
plant at Durham (north of Fanno Creek). It was designed to remove
significantly more of the pollution components. It removes phosphorus, for
example, and the previous plants had not.
Six parameters are the major measures of pollution: dissolved oxygen, fecal
coliform bacteria, pH, total solids, biological oxygen demand, and inorganic
nitrogen. These are combined in the Oregon Water Quality Index (OWQI) for
more generalized summaries of water quality.
Fanno Creek The upper section of Fanno Creek (above Denny Road) while
somewhat polluted from urban runoff that resulted in nutrient enrichment and
therefore fairly high Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) levels, has relatively
good quality water. The lower portion was grossly polluted from a number of
sewerage treatment plants until 1976, when their flows were diverted to the
new Durham plant. The Oregon Water Quality Index (OWQI) value in 1975 was
jumped to 55.4 by 22.5. but this had ju p Y 1979. A comparison of individual
parameter values, before and after diversion, is made in Table VI. In 1977
fish were noticed in the lower creek for the first time in many years. Fanno
Creek has the most completely urbanized watershed in Washington County, and
the result is a water quality that remains the worst in Washington County.
TABLE VI
OREGON WATER QUALITY INDEX VALUES
FANNO CREEK AT DURHAM ROAD
1970-1979
Date OWQI Date OWQI
1970 39 1975 22.5
1971 33.8 1976 37.6
1972 34 1977 42.4
1973 20.7 1978 49.6
1974 39.5 1979 55.4
TABLE VII
WATER QUALITY PARAMETER VALUES
FANNO CREEK AT HALL BOULEVARD
June, 1975 and October, 1979
Date DO BOD COND NH3 NO3 PO4
6-11-75 4.4 19.0 390 12.0 2.74 17.05
10-23-79 8.4 3.3 90 0.13 0.39 0.14
DO = Dissolved Oxygen NH3 = Ammonia
BOD = Biological Oxygen Demand NO3 = Nitrogen Oxides
COND = Conductivity PO4 = Phosphates
With an increasing population and urbanized area, the future trend in clear:
"Given the present conditions, there is no place for water quality to go but
down." The Corps of Engineers has estimated expected increases in water
pollution to the year 2000 (Table VIII). .
Page 19
TABLE VIII
PROJECTED PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN POLLUTANTS (from 1975)
Fecal
Basin Year Susp Set' BOD N P Coleform
Fanno Creek 1985 5.6 6.3 4.2 5.0 5.2 8.9
2000 13.6 15.0 11.0 11.4 13.4 20.2
Despite a concerted effort to collect, treat, and properly dispose of
wastewater, water quality can become degraded from seasonal overflows of
sewage mixed with urban storm runoff. Such untreated discharges are caused by
inadequate capacity of sewage collection and treatment facilities.
The combined sewers that cause such overflows present complex abatement
problems that are economically difficult to define or solve. In Tigard,
overflows generally occur at times of high river flows, not during the low
flow season.
Water quality impacts from urban stormwater runoff are difficult to define and
assess because urban runoff is a nonpoint source. The City of Portland and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are currently trying to assess the effects of
urban stormwater runoff with the aid of computer modeling.
Urban stormwater pollutants may include Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD),
settleable and suspended solids, organics, nutrients, and heavy metals. The
pollutants can come from automobiles, urban litter, construction activity, and
from many urban activities. In rural areas, stormwater pollutants may in
large part come from agricultural activities such as livestock wastes and
fertilizers.
Urban stormwater pollutant loadings can be a significant contribution to the
pollution content of streams (as much as four times that from municipal
wastewater treatment plants). In the urban environment, stormwater runoff
flows are increased over those in natural areas because of impervious surfaces
that prevent rainfall from soaking into the ground or being stored in natural
depressions. A large volume of runoff with a high velocity flushed pollutants
from their sources into storm sewers and receiving streams.
Although the impact of the pollutants on stream water quality is not yet
known, BOD loadings tend to decrease dissolved oxygen levels, and heavy metals
and organics may be toxic to aquatic life on a localized basis. However,
during periods of stormwater runoff, receiving streams generally provide high
dilution of such pollutants.
The following table, taken from the CRAG 208 Study, is a comparison of
projected point and nonpoint pollutant loads in the Tualatin River Basin, year
2000.
Page 20
TABLE IX
COMPARISON OF POINT AND NONPOINT POLLUTANT LOADS
TUALATIN RIVER BASIN, YEAR 2000
Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants Nonpoint Urban Runoff
Plant BOD & SS (1B/yr) Basin BOD (lb/yr) SS (1B/yr)
5 5
Durham 840,000 Fanno Creek 202,300 25,542,600
DEQ is beginning to explore the other "nonpoint source" impacts on water
quality. These include forest management activities, agricultural activities
and stream corridor managment activities.
LAND RESOURCES
Land resources quality is a broad term encompassing the suitability of the
land for particular' uses. The land within Tigard has been shown to be
suitable for a variety of uses, depending upon
the characteristics of
particular sites. Land resources quality may also be more narrowly defined as
the quality of the land in regard to waste and process discharges (These refer
to solid waste, thermal, noise, atmosphere or water pollutants, contaminants,
or products therefrom) .
Pollution from sludge and solid waste has accompanied urbanization and
industrialization and is a feature of nearly all densely populated urban
areas. Solid waste collection and disposal is a vital element in establishing
and maintaining livable environments. Historically, the organized removal of
solid waste has dramatically effected the health of all urban residents. Land
quality in Tigard is not threatened by waste and process discharges. In
addition, there are no solid waste dump sites inside the City limits.
There is one private landfill, Grabhorn, located west of Beef Bend Road. This
landfill accepts only waste resulting from construction demolition (bricks,
concrete, dirt, etc.). According to the Metropolitan Service District (MSD),
this landfill will probably close in the next couple of years.
Solid Waste Disposal
The Metropoltan Service District (MSD) has been designated with the primary
responsibility of finding a solution to the disposal of solid wastes, which is
regional problem. MSD maintains a regional solid waste management plan which
is used to guide activities such as the search for new regional landfills and
planning of solid waste transfer stations, resource re-covery plants, and
recycling programs.
Collection of solid wastes in the City is handled by private firms operating
under mutually exclusive franchises granted by the City Council.
Page 21
City policies and strategies regarding the solid waste management must include
recognition of MSD's primary role in planning and coordinating solid waste
disposal for the region and provisions which will help achieve the regional
objectives of reducing the amount of wastes that need to be disposed of in
sanitary landfills.
• Three private firms hold exclusive franchises with the City and County to
collect solid waste in the Tigard area. They generally provide routine
garbage collection, drop box special loads, compact waste and recycle
newspapers. Service areas have been convoluted and indistinct in some areas
in the past. However, the City has redrafted its franchise ordinance to
create clear service boundaries. These boundaries provide for the following
division of the Tigard Plan Area.
Miller's Sanitary Service - Northern Tigard (north half of NPO #7, NPO #2
north of N. Dakota and west of Greenburg and NPO #4 east of Hall and north
of Pfaffle and Pacific) .
Schmidt's Sanitary Service - Southern Tigard (southern 3/4 of NPO #6 south
of Murdock and Sattler and southwest corner of NPO #5 generally south of
Bonita and west of 76th).
Frank's Disposal Service - Central Tigard (including south Tigard
industrial area and remaining areas not served by either Schmidt's or
Miller's).
The three local garbage collectors currently haul collected wastes 15 to 20
miles away, or 30 to 40 miles for a roundtrip by truck. Miller's and
Schmidt's now transport refuse to Rossman's Landfill in Oregon City, while
Frank's waste material is hauled to the City of Newberg Landfill. St. Johns
Landfill in north Portland is also being used, which can meet the need for a
few years. However, the metropolitan area lacks a long-term landfill disposal
capacity. The Rossman's Landfill is scheduled for closure this summer, for
instance.
In 1977, MSD adopted a plan for a processing facility where wastes would be
separated and the combustible portion burned to generate electricity and also \
- original Toward
the volume of waste to about one tenth of its o igi l volume. o ward
!
this goal, a site for a Resource Recover Facility has been selected in Oregon
City and the garbage-to-energy plan is expected to begin to operate in 1985,
and it is estimated that about 2/3 of the total wastes can be disposed of by
this technique.
With the St. Johns Landfill closing in a few years, MSD has been seeking
permits for a new landfill in northwest Multnomah County. With resource
recovery operating, the new landfill would last for 25 years. Without the
garbage burner, the landfill would be good for about 16 years.
Tying the system together will be transfer stations. Metro plan to construct
transfer stations at various locations in the region to increase the
efficiency and economy of the solid waste management system. Transfer
stations are enclosed facilities where commercial collectors and private
citizens can dispose of their garbage, which is then transferred in large
S
i
Page 22
trucks to either a landfill or resource recovery facility. Transfer stations
save energy by reducing trips for garbage collectors. They also provide a
convenient place to recycle, each transfer station will have a full-line
recycling center as part of the facility. Therefore, they allow for improved
landfill management by providing an interim point for directing garbage to the
proper disposal site.
•
Current proposals call for MSD to construct one transfer station on the east
side of the region, one on the west side (probably in Washington County), and
a limited transfer station on the resource recovery site in Oregon City. This
limited station will accept garbage from haulers as well as the general
public. When the resource recovery plant opens, the haulers will go directly
to that facility and the transfer station will serve only the public.
4.1 AIR QUALITY
FINDINGS
o Within the Tigard Planning Area there are no major point source air
polluters.
• o The major source of air pollution in Tigard is automobile emissions.
o The City of Tigard lies within the Portland-Vancouver Interstate Air
Quality Maintenance Area (AQMA) . This area is described in the draft
State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality, published jointly by the
Department of Environmental Quality and the Metropolitan Service District
in April, 1979. The draft State Implementation Plan (SIP) shows that the
entire AQMA is in non-attainment for meeting the recently revised federal
ambient air quality standards for ozone and is predicted to remain in
non-attainment to at least 1987 unless additional control measures are
undertaken. MSD and DEQ are developing a regional control strategy to
bring the metropolitan area into attainment by 1987.
o In the Portland - Vacouver AQMA, air pollution is monitored by and
planning efforts coordinated through the Metropolitan Service District
(MSD)and the Department of Environment Quality (DEQ).
o The draft SIP also projects non-attainment in 1982 for CO (near Highway
99W). The City of Tigard is aware of these potential problem areas and
will work with MSD to better quantify the extent of these problems.
•
POLICY
4.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TIGARD'S AIR
QUALITY AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND AGENCIES TO REDUCE
AIR POLLUTIONS WITHIN THE PORTLAND - VANCOUVER AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE
•
AREA. (AQMA).
Page 23
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City will coordinate with MSD and DEQ to attain and maintain the
air quality goal described in the State Implementation Plan (SIP).
2. The City will continue to utilize expertise available at the
Department of Environmental Quality, the Metropolitan Service
District, and other relevant agencies, to coordinate efforts aimed at
reducing air pollution emission levels in the Tigard and entire
Portland Metropolitan Area.
3. Until such time as control strategies are realized, the City of Tigard
will use measures described in the DEQ Handbook for "Environmental
Quality Elements of Oregon Local Comprehensive Land Use Plans" when
planning any development activities having the potential to directly
(b‘' direct emissions) or indirectly (by increasing vehicular travel)
attect air quality.
4. The City will make every effort to design municipal streets and
roadways and to establish traffic flow patterns which minimize or
reduce vehicular emissions.
•
5. The City will consult and coordinate with the Oregon Department
Environmental Quality to ensure that land uses and activities in
Tigard comply with Federal and State air quality standards.
6. The City will aim to reduce the quantity of vehicle emissions by
pursuing an energy-efficient urban form which reduces the number of
vehicle miles traveled, and by encouraging the use of alternate modes
of transportation, especially mass transit and pedestrian.
4.2 WATER QUALITY
FINDINGS •
o. The quality of Tigard's surface waters are fair, inasmuch as the waters
are not used for drinking purposes.
o No major point source water polluters threaten local creeks.
o Some infiltration problems exist in the sewage systems.
o Reduction of open space, removal of vegetation cover, and development
which increases the amount of impervious surface contribute significantly
Co increases in the peak flows of urban storm runoff entering storm
sewers, creeks and drainageways.
o Offsetting measures can reduce the negative effects of urban development
•
on water quality and quantity problems. Examples include on site
retention/ detention of stormwater, inclusion of landscape buffer areas
adjacent to new development and conservation and improvement of streamside
vegetation along creeks and other water courses.
Page 24
POLICIES
4.2.1 ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA SHALL COMPLY
WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.
4.2.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE AND ASSUME ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATING,
PLANNING, AND REGULATING WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AS DESIGNATED IN MSD'S
WASTE TREATMENT MANAGEMENT COMPONENT AND 208.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES /
1. In order to improve the water quality and and quantity in the Tigard
Area, the City will consider developing regulations in the Tigard
Community Development Code or instituting programs to:
a. Increase public awareness of techniques and practices private
individuals can employ to help correct water quality problems;
b. Improve the management of industrial and commercial operations to
reduce negative water quality impacts;
c. Regulate site planning for new development and construction
through the Tigard Community Development Code to better control
drainages and erosion and to manage storm runoff;
d. Increase storage and retention of storm runoff to lower and delay
park storm flows;
e. Reduce street related water quality and quantity problems; and
f. Increase public awareness concerning the use and disposal of toxic
substances.
2. The City will not permit industrial or other uses which violate State
of Oregon water quality discharge standards.
3. The City will cooperate with the Metropolitan Service District and
other appropriate agencies to establish practices which minimize the
introduction of pollutants into ground and surface waters.
4. The City will require that new developments be connected to the City's�1\�``�,�
or the Unified Sewerage Agency sanitary sewerage systems. ��
4.3 NOISE POLLUTION
FINDINGS
o Noise is a recognized cc sew of physical and psychological stress which
has been directly related to various health problems.
IIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIMIMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII
•
•
Page 25
o Motor vehicle traffic noise is the major contributor to the ambient noise
level in Tigard.
o Noise levels for almost all residential districts in Tigard appear to be
within acceptable levels.
o The highest noise levels appear to be found along Pacific Highway (99W),
Main Street, 1-5, Hwy 217 and Hall Boulevard.
o Effective control of the undesirable effects of highway generated noise
levels requires a three part approach: 1) source emission reduction,
2) 'improved highway design and street design; and 3) land use controls.
The first two components are currently being addressed by private industry
and by federal, state and regional agencies. The third area is
essentially a local government responsibility.
•
POLICY
4.3.1 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE
FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL NOISE EMISSION STANDARDS IN ORDER TO
MAINTAIN A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT FOR THOSE WHO LIVE, WORK AND RECREATE
IN TIGARD.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The Tigard Community Development Code will ensure that future "noise
sensitive" developments are designed and located so as to minimize the
intrusion of noise from motor vehicle traffic and/or neighboring noisy
uses.
2. The Tigard Community Development Code will ensure that new commercial,
• industrial and public developments are landscaped and designed such
that Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) noise standards are met
and neighboring "noise sensitive" properties are not negatively
impacted by the new land use or associated activities. This will be
accomplished through building setbacks, buffering standards and use
compatibility.
3. The City will seek a response and/or assistance from the Department of
Environment Quality (DEQ) when reviewing commercial or industrial uses
in or near residental areas to prevent degradation or previously quiet
environments.
4.4 LAND RESOURCES
FINDINGS
o Solid waste disposal is a regional concern requiring regional solutions.
o Land quality in Tigard is not currently threatened by a large - scale
waste disposal site.
I
Page 26
o Normal human activity and economic processes in Tigard contribute to the
quantity of regional waste disposal.
o The Metropolitan Service District (MSD) has the authority to provide solid
and liquid waste disposal in the metropolitan area.
o Although MSD has the authority over solid waste site location, local
governments will be involved in the selection process.
POLICY
4.4.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE, IF POSSIBLE, THE CURRENT QUALITY
OF TIGARD'S LAND RESOURCES.
4.4.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE MSD'S RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY TO PREPARE
AND IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City will actively participate with the Metropolitan Service
District (MSD) and the Department of Environment Quality (DEQ), in the
solid waste site selection process.
2. The City will discourage solid waste sites in which would adversely
affect neighboring land uses or which are unsuitable because of
natural conditions at the site, including but not limited to:
a) Depth to water table
b) Soil conditions
c) Impacts upon drainage
d) Water quality degradation or similar problems
3. Th' City will ensure that future land use activities with significant
waste and process discharges conform to all State and Federal
environmental quality standards. •
4. The City will seek a response or assistance from the Department of
Environmental Quality or any other interested State or Federal agency
when reviewing proposed land uses with potential for significant waste
and process discharges.
S. The City will continue to use local recycling services and will
encourage and cooperate with all recycling agencies.
6. The City will recognize MSD's role in preparing and implementing a
solid waste management plan. The City will support MSD's "Procedures
for Siting Sanitary Landfill," and will participate in these
procedures as appropriate.
•
Page 27
SOURCES
Handbook for Environmental Quality Elements of Land Uses Plans, Oregon
Department o Environmenta mua ty, Ju y,
Air Quality Annual Report - 1982, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,
June, 1982.
State Air Quality Implementation Plan (SIP), Metropolitan Service District,
April,
"Comprehensive Plan Noise Element Guidelines," Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality.
Water Quality in Oregon- 1980, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,
!�I
October
"Comprehensive Resource Document," Washington County Planning Department, 1981.
•
•
•
1782 '
COMPARISON OF LOCAL WATER RATES
■. M1. NI. I. NI. r.
Aia (./..../), aromiiii ilipia, ----- gro.....fill ,1
/®® • ■ ii ■logo gams ■ EMIR IMP •i•® •llII•■ saws vire le Name Wm ■EIM
so
CC
ss
4
S 50 Pe' 1
tAJ 45
3 X10 /
1"." / ,.:. " . (#.0/' /
ei,WATER
. / / ////35 / , 0 // / e / / /
PORTLAND TIGARD ' METZGER WOLF CREEK OEAVERTON 0 U I sA M TUALATIN
Swn...r **ter SurnT►r Vn+lw. Swan WNW 5e,,w..i YAM se ' S.wtM AT %WOW S.ww wM.r r�w
Sue Midge
14.68 8,60 17.39 12.50 37.56 25.90 139.86 26.96 . 46.08 26,24 45,5,3 29.90 58.82 43.16
Chart shows how average bimonthly water bills vary for typical resident who consumes ,
12,525 gallons a month In summer and 6,009 gallons In winter and lives In ;60,000 home
• .
-3-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development '°
DATE: December 7 , 1982
SUBJECT: Suggested Revisions to Economy CompreheAtive Plan
Element Report. (CPA 8-82)
The following are suggested language changes to the Economy element
policies :
Page 13 - 4th finding down - Delete everything after the first
sentence ending with "Tigard" .
Add this finding:
Complementary residential development in commercial
districts can support aggolmerations, help to minimize
crime within the commercial districts , provide housing
for senior citizens which is in close proximity to
shopping areas , and minimize vehicular travel which
would reduce pollution and conserve energy.
POLICY 5. 1. 2 Change "will" to "Shall"
POLICY 5.1. 3 Change "will" to "Shall"
Add POLICY 5 .1. 5
5.1. 5 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS EXCEPT:
COMPLEMENTARY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED
ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND
THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND ABOVE THE SECOND
FLOOR IN COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL DISTRICTS. (THE
DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE R-20 DISTRICTS .)
Page 15 - Delete implementation strategy 4 17
Add
17. The Tigard Community Development Code shall designate the
types of permitted residential development in C-N, C-P and
CBD commercial districts .
Other changes to the content of the plan have been made to provide
supportive documentation to these findings, policies and implementation
strategies.
I•
,
,
.
•
c '
pomehene n 9eort
t
,
x
..''''''' in I I.,..'i: I I \i I 1 I 11 D). i
' '' ----"' 7
r, ,, n ,_ , , , i , i 1 , , , ?. \I i; 1 \ / ,
, , ,. 3 _ '.' , .,...1 , i ,,, I ,,, „. i, , 1 .,,,.,„j ? ,' 1
..„, , , „ 1 . , f'3 r
tt C
Y S i
E, - t'
- ti
• CI1YOF TI64 RD
WASIGTON COUNTY,OR
4
ECONOMY
TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND .DEVELOPMENT
NOVEMBER, 1982
City Council Planning Commission
Wilbur Bishop Mayor Frank Tepedino - President
John Cook Cliff Speaker
Tom Brian Donald Moen
Nancie Stimler Richard Helmer
Ken Scheckla Mark Christen
Roy Bonn
Bonnie Owens
Deane Leverett
Phil Edin
Project Staff
Bob Jean - City Administrator
1 William A. Monahan - Planning Director
Jeremy Coursolle - Associate Planner
Liz Newton - Associate Planner
Adrianne Brockman - City Attorney's Office
Patt Martin - Word Processing
DRAFT: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 2
A. Labor Force 2
B. Population 5
C. Residential Location of Workers 7
D. Income 7
III. RECENT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS 9
A. Buildable Lands 9
B. City Commercial Development 11
C. City Industrial Development 11
D. Transportation 12
E. Public Facilities 12
FINDINGS 14
POLICIES 15
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 16
IV. ACTION PLAN 17
I. INTRODUCTION
This report addresses LCDC Statewide Planning Goal #9 requirements titled
"Economy of the State." The recommended findings and policies have been
developed to blend Tigard's individual economic programs into those of the
region and state to meet Goal #9 requirements.
The Goal #9 statement reads: "To diversify and improve the economy of the
state.'•
"Both state and federal economic plans and policies shall be coordinated by
the state with local and regional, needs. Plans and policies shall contribute
to a stable and healthy economy in all regions of the state. Plans shall be
based on inventories of, areas suitable for increased economic growth and
activity after taking into consideration the health of the current economic
base; materials and energy availability; labor market factors; availability of
renewable and non-renewable resources; availability of land, and pollution
control requirements.
Economic growth and activity in accordance with such plans shall be encouraged
in areas that have underutilized human and natural resource capabilities and
want increased growth and activity. Alternative sites suitable for economic
growth and expansion shall be designated in such plans."
The Tigard economy is greatly influenced by economic forces which affect the
Portland SMSA, the State of Oregon, and the nation. Although the economy has
suffered during the past several years, Tigard has experienced much new
economic development. Although the residents of the City are dependent upon
Portland for job opportunities, Tigard also has exhibited the ability to
survive as a separate economic entity of the SMSA. The steady economic growth
within the City growth boundaries has reinforced the opinion of City officials
that Tigard has an opportunity during the next few years to take advantage of
its location, highway access, municipal services, and other positive factors
to attract further economic development.
Tigard is prepared to coordinate its economic development efforts with those
of other cities of Washington County, the County, Metropolitan communities,
and the State. In addition, the City will take appropriate steps to provide
technical assistance to property developers while streamlining the economic
development approval process.
-1-
Economic Development
Goal: The goal of the City of Tigard is to improve the economic base of the
community by creating a wide range of job opportunities. Further, it is the
intent of the City to create stability in the City's economy through
diversification.
To implement the economic policies of the City stated on pages 12-15, Tigard
will work to develop a public/private partnership aimed at maintaining an
ongoing economic development program. For success to occur, resources must be
identified, compiled, and regularly updated concerning economic activities
underway or planned, available and planned municipal resources, available
land, and available financial resources. The City will take a lead to
initiate the cooperative effort, however, for the program to be successful,
the business community must be willing to commit resources and time to
formulate strategies which reflect the needs of the private enterprises and
firms located in Tigard.
II. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The majority of job opportunities in Tigard, Washington County, and the entire
Portland SMSA, are available from the private sectors. Therefore, in order to
cre e new, more diversified, and higher paid skilled jobs, the City must
focus on stimulating private business development. To accomplish this, the
City must identify those firms which either exist presently in Tigard and are
suitable for expansion, or could be attracted to Tigard. Given the recent
influx of so called high technology industries to Washington County, Tigard
should concentrate energy toward a continued program to attract some of the
associated firms into the City. Success has already occurred in this area and
should continue, however, for a truly stable economy Tigard must attract a
diversified mix of commercial and industrial uses. The Tigard economic goal
is directed toward creating conditions condusive to promoting business
expansion both physical and relat. .', to job opportunities, attracting new
industries, and assisting private firms to prosper in Tigard. A diversified
economy, with a continuing reliance on the high technology industry, within a
pro growth environment properly guarded by municipal officials is the economic
goal of Tigard.
I
A. Labor. Force
Tigard as a part of the Portland SMSA has fared better than the state as a
whole or the nation in terms of unemployment and the economy generally. In
July 1982, unemployment in the Portland SMSA was 9.5%, the highest rate since
1975, however, the rate is lower than the state rate of 10.7 or the national
rate of 9.8.
-2-
TABLE I
CITY OF TIGARD
PORTLAND SMSA
/ AVERAGE, ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT
AS A PERCENT OF LABOR FORCE
Portland
Year SMSA 1 Oregon U.S.
1970 6.3% 7.1% 4.9%
1971 7.1 7.6 5.9
1972 6.4 6.8 5.6
1973 5.4 6.2 4.9
1974 6.2 7.5 5.6
1975 9.5 10.6 8.5
1976 8.7 9.6 7.7
1977 6.8 7.3 7.0
1978 5.2 6.0 6.0
1979 5.4 6.8 5.8
1980 6.2 8.2 7.1
1981 7.9 9.7 7.6
July 1982 9.52 10.7 9.8
1 Includes Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties. .
2 Not seasonally adjusted.
From 1971 to 1982 the SMSA experienced a 3.96% annual increase in labor force,
from 442,900 to 653,000. During this same time period the percent of workers
employed in manufacturing dropped from 21.3% to 19.5% while the percentage of
workers employed in non-manufacturing jobs went down. Meanwhile, 23,000 new
manufacturing opportunities came into the area comprising a significant
percentage of the new jobs in the SMSA.
-3- •
TABLE II
CITY OF TIGARD
PORTLAND SMSA
EMPLOYMENT ANNUAL AVERAGES AND PERCENT BY INDUSTRY GROUP
1971-81
Annual
Percent Percent Rate of
1971 of Total 1981 of Total' Change
CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE
Labor Force 442.900 653,000 +3.96%
Unemployed 31,300 48,100 +4.39
Percent of Labor Force 7.1% 8.0%
Unemployed
Total Employment2 411,600 600,500 +3.85
Non-Agricultural Wage and 385.800 545,500 +3.52'
Salary Employees
r
Agricultural Total 8,500 ' 2.2% 7,800 1.4% -0.86%
Manufacturing Total 84,000 21.3% 107,700 19.5% +2.52%
Durable Goods 53,700 13.6 76,800 13.9 +3.64
Non-Durable Goods 30,300 7.7 30,900 5.6 +0.20
•
Norn-Manufacturin2.Total 301,800 76.5,. 437,800 79.1% +3.79% t
Trade 94,100 23.9 141,800 25.6 +4.19
Government 64,200 16.3 81,000 14.6 +2.35
Service and Miscellaneous 70,500 17.8 111,600 20.2 +4.70
Finance, Insurance, 25,100 6.4 45,400 8.2 +6.11
Real Estate
Transportation, Communi- 29.900 7.6 36,500 6.6 +2.01
cations and Utilities
Construction 18,000 4.6 21,500 3.9 +1.79
Labor-Management Disputes 1.0 0.3
TOTAL AGRICULTURAL, MANUFACTURING 394,300 100.0% 553,500 100.0% +3.45%
AND NON-MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES
'Percent of Total is based agricultural.d on total ricultural, manufacturing and non-manufacturing employees.
2lncludes non-agricultural wage and salary, self-employed, unpaid family workers, domestics,
agricultural workers and labor disputants.
Source: State of Oregon Department of Human Resources. Employment Division.
-4-
B. Population
Tigard as a subelement of the SMSA` has undergone a significant increase in
ir population (173.7% since 1970) exceeding that of the State and even Washington
County. Population growth would not have occurred without an .increase in job
opportunities and private development coupled with the annexation of several
areas. Some of the, most recent trends indicate that. Tigard,'s. advantageous
- highway accessibility,: proximity to Portland,; the . high technology.
concentration"°in Washington County, and the quality of life in general will
continue to make the City ,an attractive place for economic, growth.
The City will continue to grow as a result of annexations which are in process 1
as well as proposed.
TABLE III
CERTIFIED POPULATION
CITY OF TIGARD
1970 TO 1982
YEAR POPULATION % INCREASE OVER PREVIOUS YEAR
1970 6,300
1971 7,065 12%
1972 7,067 0
1973 7,379 4
1974 9,500 28
1975 10,085 6
1976 10,226 1
1977 11,114 8 o
1978 11,899 7
1979 13,697 15
1980 14,855 8
1981 14,690 -1
1982 17,244 17
Source: Center for Population Research and Census, Portland State University.
-5-
TABLE IV
STATE AND COUNTY POPULATION TRENDS
% of % of
Area 1960 SMSA 1970 SMSA 1980
Oregon 1,768,700 2,091,400 2,633,105
. Portland 821,800 1,009,200 1,242,594
Wash.: County 92,200 11.2 157,900 15.6 245,808
Clackamas 113,000 13.7 166,100 16.4 241,919
Multnomah 522,800 63.7 556,700 55.2 562,640
Clark 93,800 11.4 127,500 12.8 192,227
Tigard 1,084* .82 6,300 1.4 14,855
* 1961.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census.,
-6-
a
C. Residential Location of Workers
While an attempt can be made to achieve a balance between job opportunities
/ and job requirements at a localdetermined there
relationship to distance from
residential location choices are. work locations became
the place of employment. In fact, throughout the SMSA,
more dispersed between 1960 and 1970, with a greater percentage of each
county's residents 'finding work outside their resident county.
• The majority
of Washington County residents kiwith utsid of the the
employ county in 1976 were
employed in Multnomah County (16X)
Multnomah County working in Washington County. The • 1981 Community Needs
Assessment prepared by Washington County indicates that somewhere between 48
and 60% of Tigard workers commute to work outside of Washington County. Most
of these workers commute north to Portland.
The evidence is clear that employment structures within g placement of ntire
metropolitan area are interrelated. Therefore, the p
industry/commerce within any jurisdiction can effect residents ofother
jurisdictions in the area. Because of the regional nature of employment
adequacy of job opportunities within the region is the critical issue and not
employment within any single jurisdiction.
The relationship of employment to housing is a slightly different issue.
Wages earned determine the affordable price range of housing (generally
considered by HUD to be 25% of monthly income). Therefore, the availability
of housing at various price ranges within any given area will determine/or
limit the locational choices available to workers each wage earning category.
D. Income
Income, analyzed in terms of dollar amounts and source, provides evidence of -
economic well-being and diversification. •
The medium family income for Tigard in 1980 was $22,233, less than that of
Washington County, but more than the state average. Almost sixty percent of
the families in Tigard had a 1980 annual income above $20,000.
•
-7-
As
TABLE V
/ CITY OF TIGARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY
INCOME ESTIMATES
Family Income Characteristics
Income No. of,Families % of Families
Less than $ 5,000 165 4.1
$ 5,000 -- $10,000 352 8.8
$10,000 - $15,000 450 11.3
$15,000 - $20,000 659 16.5
$20,000 - $25,000 732 18.3
$25,000 - $35,000 877 22.0
$35,000 - $50,000 542 13.6
$50,000 - over 216 5.4
3,993 100.0
Median Family Income - $22,293
Mean Family Income - $25,034
Source: University of Oregon Bureau of Government Research.
(Most Recent Figures Available)
Washington State of
Year County Oregon' U.S.
TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME (in millions)
1979 $ 2,280 $22,460 $1,927,005
PER CAPITA INCOME1
1979 $10,108 $ 8,887 $ 8,757
MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME
1980 $26,486 $20,952 N/A
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD EFFECTIVE BUYING INCOME
1980 $23,284 $17,162 N/A
1 According' to he U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1977
per capita money estimates for counties and incorporated places in Oregon, the
City of Tigard had an estimated 1977 per capita income of $6,995.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of
Current Business.
State of Oregon Department of Commerce, Housing Division.
Sales and Marketing Management, Survey of Current Business.
-8-
III. RECENT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
/ From 1970 to 1980 Tigard underwent a change from a rural community to a
suburban community with a strong economic base. The major factors are
location and the accessibility to transportation. It is anticipated that
recent trends will continue as the available buildable land becomes utilized
in response to increasing economic pressures. Tigard intends to channel
growth, through its land use and public facility construction policies, in a
manner which makes the best use of the remaining acreage while promoting the
expansion of job opportunities to meet the needs of a growth population.
A. Buildable Lands
A vacant buildable land inventory was completed for Tigard in September of
1981. It was found that 176.72 acres of commercial land was available as
follows:
C-3 32.55
C-4 42.32
C-5 12.90
C-P 88.95
An additional 277.57 acres of industrial land was identified:
M-2 5.70
M-3 131.40
M-4 140.47
In total, vacant-buildable commercial and industrial land comprised 32.07% of
the 1,416.97 vacant-buildable acres inventoried. The bulk of the commercial
and industrial land is located within those areas of the City with best access
to 1-5 and Hwy. 217 making these parcels more attractive to potential
developers.
These parcels are attractive because of their proximity to similar land uses,
transportation systems, and the availability of public facilities. The
corridor between Hwy. 217 and the Oregon Electric Railroad tracks as well as
the Tigard Triangle, that area contained by Pacific Highway, 1-5 and Hwy. 217,
are zoned for business uses and have undergone significant economic
developments in recent years. With provision of public facilities in the next
several years, the major industrial and commercial office development will
take place here.
Commercial shopping development will occur along Pacific Highway on land zoned
commercial which is closer in proximity to residential development than the
highway oriented sites. Tigard's location in relation to the region will
dictate that the locations along either side of Hwy. 217 will be developed for
industry and offices providing employment opportunities for the region as a
whole.
Ultimately, individual development decisions will be made on the basis of site
availability, adequacy of a site for a particular purpose in terms of size and
-9-
• •�� // ,1 it 1i ,•LARGE VACANT' BUILDABLE LAND AREAS I I. _ FI
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 ; ,�'� Ir;'( .I I ,1 I` /i $-
'' I:
DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS i �� If 1[ � ► �.lit�:
1 _.....-T-i--,.., , \ . ,rT�� f 1I T:-.,1[...-.. if,. 1=-...-•••••�
'.� --_ ,%l�f�1—lf.. I ibrit
ci?
Bey ••yl y" '`V a N„
�' . .
.
' R. � i• D. S � Ratiiiu
"V i �� l
0....n. 1 v,,, , -
;:r==',i kt: gr-----'''<iuu' ... 4::::.......z1„.., .. ,,, „..„,„. ,. . . .....,..n:., .
.....„____.......,.... ., . ..
‘. .., . c. , ," -
, .
, , . . .
. .. ... .......
•,... ,, . ,0 ..:.., . i 8,
1, •;(,•. ,1 -. '✓• .rte l O s� !` .A �
://.. i ,,,,•.-. 0• „,,,,{{{sss . ,. .,
.. ..
1
. _
•
.,..t.,;r , ju..........,, .4- . I .....:,:•;.--->., e .” s. .—‘ _
. 1. jr.. -...........___,....___________=.... ________ Z.1 :_....7...)-
y
s i•
. _ ____. .,.. r i N. 1.•••:Ae...r,,. .. . ;.., , ...
iii_l_O VC-
Jr....,
7[ 1 „.. - , :7-,../... --Iiik,
r
fl
r.. r-t .,;•Ti :: Ai
U rr .
—, ,ii,
. .c--4.”. *... / . )1.... ,.,,:,..„:„.,,,._f.,,,.. ..,:,. .,,,, ,...,... ..,,,.. .. , ..11f, ,,,,„::,:.,,i)„...„--
____.
c„...
_..„ ..
, • .
.„ ....,...........„.. . ,..(,i r, ,, pv.
,.....:,,,.... ,,,....,.....,,,,...„......„. ,„ ,,..,„.. : ,. : 4,, , ,,,,<- , ,
�� 1 i11. ii a/4,i,ell )), r2/j et r� rIII
.......
2.1nricipiril:D .-___,--_.=;;7.:-. L..• ;4+ f, „.......r.------...'''•;::."":-. 11...,*;;tp.',4*.f:;!..i. . / • ,
ir 1 ,
. c.±-25111-11:4.-..-;11 ...177...... •,,,,Cie.',. - • / 1
.Il I .:::„..:„....:. :: ,.ii l t f•
•
Fy _F4 r
4te.7 "-.'1.11.' (1A\ II '1' '' 7 • ':•,... •,/ •. •".2,
—10— ■ i .\ 1; .
shape, municipal development standards governing the land, topographic
features, availability and capacity of utilities, as well as access to highway
and proximity to uses of a similar nature. These geographical considerations
/ will be evaluated along with the psychological factors and economic features
which are evaluated by individual business concerns.
B. City Commercial Development
Rapid population growth between 1970 and 1980 changed the complexion of the
City from a rural community to a growing suburban community and created a
rapidly expanding demand for goods and services. Trade patterns followed the
major highways through the City, developing commercial zones along the
highways and other major arterial streets. City residents rely not only on
commercial concerns within Tigard to meet their needs. Regional and local
facilities located in Beaverton, Lake Oswego, and unincorporated county areas,
as well as Portland, meet specific buying needs of Tigard residents. Of
particular note are Washington Square and Kruse Way which provide shopping
opportunities which attract consumers from Tigard and other communities.
These facilities will continue to meet special shopping needs of Tigard
residents.
According to the 1980 Update of Washington County's Overall Economic
Development Plan (OEDP), the supply of vacant commercial land in Tigard is
adequate for the time being. If the current economic recession ends and
development begins, the City may have a shortage of commercial land in a short
time. The supply of developed commercial space is low but it is expected that
the supply will catch up with needs before long.
Commercial activity has developed in a strip along State Highway 99W (Pacific
Highway), with increasing development along Highway 217 and Hall Boulevard.
This includes eating and drinking establishments, general retail and numerous
individual businesses. Commercial and professional office development is
increasing along Pacific Highway and in the triangle formed by Pacific
Highway, Highway 217 and Interstate 5.
Washington Square, one of the metropolitan area's three major regional
shopping centers, is located on the northern boundary of the City just outside
way for a major expansion;nsion• and a
the City limits. Plans are currently under y j p �
medium-rise office building is planned, with another of equal size to be built
in the future. When these expansions are completed, they will provide
approximately 425 to 500 new jobs in the area, in addition to the
approximately 2,000 jobs already located at the center.
Facilities such as Washington Square and the Kruse Way corridor represent the
type of development which assists the City to develop a stronger image of
economic vitality which is so vital to attracting new economic development.
Shopping opportunities represent one of the factors which make up the quality
of life attributed to an area.
C. City Industrial Development
As, industrial land in Portland has become increasingly scarce and costly, the
greater supply of industrially zoned land in the Tigard area has attracted a
variety of manufacturing firms. Major manufacturing employers in the City
include both heavy and light industry. New developments include mostly light
industry.
-11- •
•
Industrial development in the City is concentrated west of Interstate 5, along
, the Burlington Northern and Southern Pacific railroad tracks, and along
�
Southwest 72nd Avenue south of Highway 217.
Tigard has attracted some major development during the last few years which,
like Washington Square on the commercial development side, acts as a magnet •to
other similar or associated industries which follow the trends of major
firms. Business parks such as those developed at 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones
Ferry Road and at Scholls Ferry Road and Highway 217 are sources of
encouragement for Tigard's economy. With an estimated 277 acres of buildable
industrial land located close to 1-5, similar parks which are great assets to
the community should be developed in the next few years.
D. Transportation
Tigard is located adjacent to the major highways on the western boundary of
metropolitan Portland including Interstate 5, Highway 217 and Highway 99W
(Pacific Highway). The bulk of the buildable land remains along 1-5 which
should be attractive to economic development. Figure 4-1, taken from the
Regional Transportation Plan prepared by Metro illustrates the existing and
proposed principal routes and major arterials.
Street patterns have developed on a rural base, resulting in some
inconvenience and congestion. Highway 99W passes through downtown Tigard and
serves as a major thoroughfare. Heavy congestion through the City has been
relieved with new signals and land design.
In the urban parts of Washington County, about 84 percent of all daily trips
are made in private autos, according to the . Washington County Draft
•
Comprehensive Plan. Only 2.5 percent are made by public transit. Tri-Met,
the regional public transit agency, has improved service in the area and plans
to continue to do so, with the addition of a transit center in Tigard, a
beltline route for intra-county travel (that is, suburb-to-suburb), and a
light rail system (now in the conceptual stage). The agency is looking for
new sources of funding, with an emphasis on local sources. Increased use of
public transit is expected to relieve some of the traffic congestion.
Rail service is provided to Tigard by Burlington Northern Railroad and
Southern Pacific Railroad while air service is provided by the Port of
Portland, which operates the Portland International Airport, 17 miles
northeast of Portland. This airport is served by eight scheduled airlines.
The Port also operates a general aviation airport approximately 15 miles south
of Tigard at Aurora and 14 miles northwest of Tigard at Hillsboro.
The Port of Portland maintains shipping facilities on the Willamette River
which is 12 miles from the City of Tigard.
E. Public Facilities
Water is provided to the City from the Tigard Water District and the Metzger
Water District. Tigard Water District draws its supply from the Clackamas
River and the Bull Run Reservoir. The system and supply are adequate to the
year 2000, according to the district's manager. The water source for Metzger
Water District is also Bull Run Reservoir.
-12-
a _
k B C
'.-1` \
• . � _ •:
.•, 32 E_,""1t ` `\'�_.`` '4•- • ` - ..• �✓ 0..-+..; _`_
1 \•.3 5 . .4- ---"--:z --
401
0
:-. , w
29: 27
∎ .� - -
` `�.r =28 ��.• ` _ _ 33 F
24 / _ f•: ,
._ _. ... ._` --_ `y \---. _ .sea - 2.1-2i•• ; � t• .-. rf•
-_ - - __. _ - - • _ 21 20 ti f,
_ _ „ . ... r . .. 4'..l.,
.e Principal Route -- —
......94.4.4. Freeway I - - - •. .
— Major Arterial Route _. .-- - ;�,
Potential Major Arterial Route ,• ---= G G :✓-
. �.
F
Regional
Transportation PRINCIPAL ROUTES & MAJOR ARTERIALS FIG. 4 -1
11:,0 Plan a..—
.
A policy of the City contained in the Public Facilities and Services element
requires that as a precondition to development a site must be served by a
//, water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes and
the development shall not reduce the water pressure in the area below a level
adequate for fire protection purposes.
Sewer service is provided by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) which treats
sewage at the Durham Treatment Plant. The City of Tigard owns and maintains.
the collection- system. The treatment facility as constituted, according to
USA, has adequate facilities for an additional 19,000 residential hookups, or
the equivalent. USA also projects that it will be necessary to create
additional capacity within five to ten years.
The City does require that all new development be connected to a sanitary
sewer service.
In order that growth may occur in a rational manner, the City has taken steps
to anticipate growth and provide necessary services to areas which are prime
for development. The City also encourages the use of local improvement
districts to fund the public improvements needed by a business choosing to
locate on a vacant parcel of land. Coordination is necessary in order that
delay is minimized when a potential development project surfaces.
Other public and private facilities such as fire protection, police
protection, health care, educational facilities such as Portland Community
College, and utilities are available to the citizens of Tigard. Energy is
still plentiful and relatively inexpensive, as it is throughout the Pacific
Northwest. Eventually, however, demand is projected to exceed supply as
population and industry continue to grow.
Recent projections indicate that energy deficits will not occur until the late
1990's. To prepare for the future, a regional power planning council was
created to develop a regional load forecast to determine the amount of power
needed to meet the requirements of the Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Montana
region.
Overall, adequate public facilities, mostly with a long economic life, are
available to industries choosing to move to Tigard. Coupled with the
availability of sewer, the City will encourage growth through its land use
policies by streamlining the development process to prevent unnecessary delays
in the process to obtain permits for construction. The City is aware,
however, that new and expanded public facilities will be required to open new
areas up for commercial and industrial uses. By the creation and
implementation of a capital improvements program, the City will work to
anticipate and plan for the most optimum economic use of the remaining land in
Tigard.
FINDINGS
Through analysis of the economic conditions which affect Tigard, the existing
make up of the community, the potential for growth, and the City's interest in
asserting existing and new businesses to expand in and relocate to Tigard, the
following findings were identified.
o The City of Tigard is a subelement of the Portland metropolitan economic
region.
-14-
•
o The economic climate of the City, in part, is subject to the influences of
external economic forces beyond the control of the City.
o The City continues to experience steady commercial and industrial growth
despite the national and state economic situation.
o A significant amount of commercial and industrial buildable land is
available in areas where all services are provided making it suitable for
development.
o Manufacturing, wholesale and retail activities provide the majority of the '
employment opportunities to area residents.
o An increasing regional dependence on electrical, electronic, and
instrument related manufacturing employment has occurred in recent years.
o There is a need for new and expanded public facilities to open areas for
industrial and commercial uses.
o Economic data, particularly that relating to sites available for
development purposes, is largely unavailable or not kept up to date.
o A need exists to promote the benefits of operating a business in Tigard.
o The Central Business District demands attention and community support in
order that improvement programs may be set in motion to make it a more
diversified and economically viable core area.
o The existing railroad facilities in Tigard are an asset to industrial and
commercial development on property adjacent to the rails.
o Ease of access to 1-5 and Highway 217 serve as incentives to economic
development in Tigard.
o Tigard's proximity to Portland Community College provides opportunity for
the creation of specialized job training programs to serve existing,
expanding, and new industries in the City.
o Complementary residential development in commercial districts can support
agglomerations, help to minimize crime within the commercial districts,
provide housing for senior citizens which is in close proximity to
shopping areas, and minimize vehicular travel which would reduce pollution
and conserve energy.
POLICIES
5.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROMOTE ACTIVITIES AIMED AT THE DIVERSIFICATION OF THE
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO TIGARD RESIDENTS WITH PARTICULAR
EMPHASIS PLACED ON THE GROWTH OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET,
5.1.2 THE CITY SHALL WORK WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY AND ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS
TO DEVELOP AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCORPORATING A LOCAL
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
-15-
5.1.3 THE CITY SHALL IMPROVE AND ENHANCE THE PORTIONS OF THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT AS THE FOCAL POINT FOR COMMERCIAL, HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, CIVIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY CREATING A
f DIVERSIFIED AND ECONOMICALLY VIABLE CORE AREA.
5.1.4 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN
DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES.
5.1.5 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS EXCEPT:
COMPLEMENTARY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED ABOVE THE
FIRST FLOOR IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT, AND ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR IN COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL
DISTRICTS. (THE DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE R-20 DISTRICTS.)
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City's Community Development Code will incorporate revisions needed to-
remove unnecessary obstacles which may deter new economic activities.
2. In the process of administering the City's Comprehensive Plan, careful
consideration will be given to the economic implications of all proposed
policies, programs and regulations.
3. The City will identify regional economic needs through interaction with
officials of other Washington County jurisdictions and take appropriate
action to adjust local policies to respond to their regional concerns and
needs.
4. The City, along with the business community, will develop an economic
development program aimed at attracting new commercial and industrial
development to Tigard while also encouraging the expansion of existing
business concerns.
5. The City will participate in the formulation and implementation of a
regional economic development program for the Washington County area.
6. The City will work with the local business community to develop and
maintain an up-to-date economic data resource file which will be made
available to existing and potential Tigard business concerns.
7. The City will work cooperatively with the business community seeking its
involvement and advice when working toward arriving at decisions having
economic implications for the business community.
8. The City will concentrate resources for the improvement and enhancement of
the T.U.R.A. program aimed at revitalizing the CBD utilizing public funds
and a program to encourage private investment.
9. The City will establish a downtown revitalization plan which encourages
new development by allowing more flexible zoning standards than allowed
city-wide while requiring review of all development proposals in the
T.U.R.A. area for compliance with a revitalization plan.
-16-
10. The City will develop and implement an economic development program
compatible with the potentials and constraints of the City and will
/I' a) Aid in the creation and maintenance of new and continuous employment
opportunities to afford City residents the choice of working with the
City;
b) Strive to improve, diversify and stabilize the economic base of the
community thus reducing the tax burden of the residential property.
owner; -
•
c) Aid in the effective utilization of the land, energy and human
resources; and
d) Provide for the timely development of all public facilities and
services and their delivery systems. '
11. The City will encourage the location and development of economic
activities which meet the occupational and employment needs of all City
residents, particularly the unemployed and under-employed.
12. The Community Development Code will limit development on lands planned for
commercial use; to commercial uses. Residential uses will be allowed
above the first floor.
13. The City will compile a document which identifies all parcels of land
zoned for commercial or industrial purposes and which identifies:
a) The amount and type of development on the land, if any;
b) The name of the owner;
c) The public services which are available to the site;
d) The current zoning designation; and
e) The assessed value.
14. The Cit y will maintain development codes which describe standards for
landscaping and buffering where commercial and industrial uses abut
residential districts.
15. The City will work with Portland Community College to develop training
programs as an incentive to new industries locating in Tigard needing a
trained labor force.
16. The City will coordinate its planning efforts with the Metropolitan
Service District and Oregon Department of Transportation to ensure
adequate access from major arterial routes to designated commercial and
industrial areas.
17. The Tigard Community Development Code shall designate types of permitted
residential development in C-N, C-P and CBD commercial districts.
-17-
IV. ACTION PLAN
To carry out the various implementation strategies formulated to address the
/ City policies, Tigard will undertake an economic development program. The
program will operate at two levels: 1) at the local level where City staff
and business representatives will sit as a steering committee to formulate and
carry out activities and 2) at the county-wide level through participation in
a Regional Task Force on Economic Growth. While interacting with community
and county-wide representatives to create a plan, the City will assemble and
maintain an inventory of land available for commercial or industrial use. The
inventory then will be available to those firms and individuals seeking to
expand or locate in- Tigard.
Action Steps
City Economic Development Plan - The Planning and Development Department will
coordinate the City's effort to create an overall economic development
strategy for Tigard. Recent consolidation of the planning functions with
building and code administration gives the City the opportunity to prepare
strategies for economic development while also administering the various
processes which developers must deal with in Tigard. As a result, the
department is in a unique position where it is responsible for promoting•
economic development while also requiring that all development comply with the
comprehensive plan and zoning as well as applicable building and code
standards. The situation should allow for prompt recognition by the
department personnel of existing procedures which may deter economic
development. The interplay of personnel from the Planning Division and the
Building and Code Division should result in a continually evolving modified
development process with a shorter approval period without the sacrifice of
community standards.
Staff from the Planning and Development Department will provide technical
assistance to an economic development steering committee in Tigard. The
committee will be made up of city staff, local business people, and
representatives of the various facets of the economic community. Following is
a tentative list of possible representatives:
1. City Administrator
2. City Public Works Director
3. City Planning and Development Director
4. City Council Representative
5. Planning Commission Representative
6. Tigard Urban Renewal Advisory Committee Chairman
7. Tigard Chamber of Commerce President
8. Tigard Chamber of Commerce Manager
9. Representative of a Primary Industry
10. Representative of a Secondary Industry
11. Representative of a Service Industry, perhaps High Tech
12. Real Estate Representative
13. Banking Representative
14. Business Park Manager
15. Education Representative
16. Job Training Representative
-18-
From this group, an executive committee of perhaps seven individuals will be
chosen to direct the effort to develop a strategy. The two groups will then
develop strategies and begin to assist staff in identifying the type, source,
- • / and extent of data which will be a maintained
minimum in all parcels p of place land rzoned lfor
and buildings available. At
commercial or industrial use will be inventoried with the following
information provided:
a) Identification of the property,
b) The size, shape, and,limitations of the site;
c) The use of the land;
d) Identification of buildings on the site;
e) The name of the owner;
f) The current zoning designation;
g) The assessed value;
h) The public services available to the site;
i) Any known interest on the part of the owner to sell or lease the
property; and
j) Proximity to other similarly usable land.
Once the inventory is in place, the i will
bus aggressively ilocationeavalable ito
concerning the attractiveness of Tigard or a
interested groups and individuals. A marketing plan complete with a marketing
brochure and fact sheets about Tigard will be prepared and circulated. A city
will
sponsored committee made up of public outreauhprivate
effortsector
whi h representatives coincides with
be responsible for coordinating an
attempts to encourage existing businesses in Tigard to expand.
The overall goal of the economic development program is to create program
which is compatible with the potential and constraints of the City. With t
in mind the committee will work to arrive at decisions which will effect the
business community by:
a) Aiding in the creation and maintenance esidents the choice nuous
employment opportunities to afford City r
working with the City;
b) Striving to improve, diversify and stabilize the economic base of he
community thus reducin g the tax burden of the residential property
owner;
c) Aiding in the effective utilization of the land, energy and human
resources; and
d) Ensuring the timely development of all public facilities and services
and their delivery systems.
The committee will also identify particular
such of oroyees trained personnel training and
. Job work to develop programs to provide
organizations as well as educational institutions such as Portland Community
College will be contacted and involved
developing tttog meet the
Particular attention will be p aid to devel p in g programs
occupational needs of unemployed and under-employed individuals particularly
those who are disadvantaged.
-19- •
Regional Plan - The City of Tigard will participate in the Regional Task Force
on Economic Growth created by the City of Beaverton. This committee, made up
of representatives of twelve Washington County communities, will meet on an
//' ongoing basis to coordinate local economic development plans and objectives.
A common inventory/data base will be developed and a common attraction program
instituted. Tigard recognizes the advantage of participating in such a
regional strategy both from a standpoint of greater exposure to potential
businesses, but- also because Tigard realizes that successful economic -
" development in another Washington.County cities will have a positive effect on
Tigard. For instance, a new industry which locates in Beaverton can create
jobs that people from Tigard obtain, or, the industry may create the need for
other related industries or those that serve the prime industry. Such has
been the case over the years as Tektronix has not only expanded its operation
in the Washington County area, but its presence has attracted many similar
facilities.
The central goal of the regional program is to provide for an exchange of
ideas and resources so that the participating cities may work together to
attract businesses which will be mutually advantageous in terms of jobs,
taxes, and stimulation of the economy. The cities will work together rather
than compete against one another for new industries.
Tigard will also work closely with METRO, Port of Portland, and other regional
groups which may provide information and resources which are useful to
Tigard's economic development efforts.
T.U.R.A. - Tigard in 1980 appointed a Downtown Tigard Committee to begin a
study of the need for revitalization of the central business district. Out of
this group grew a concern that a study be undertaken concerning potential
funding for renewal activity, the boundaries of the study area, types of land
uses which should be encouraged, and the public facilities needed.
Eventually, on October 12, 1981, the Tigard City Council created the Tigard
Urban Renewal Agency charging the body with the responsibility of coordinating
the renewal effort to make the commercial business area viable again. This
agency is composed of the .,'tubers of the City Council. To advise the agency,
called T.U.R.A., the Council then designated the Downtown Tigard Committee as
the T.U.R.A. Advisory Committee to assist in evaluating the problem of the
T.U.R.A. area and to help formulate solutions.
In 1981 the City Council approved the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Plan and
Report with the goal that economic growth and revitalization take place in the
area defined as the downtown commericial district. To fund the cost of public
improvement in the designated area, it is proposed that tax increment
financing be used. Funds for such a purpose would be raised from increases in
the value of private property in the area from the base year of 1981. The
Tigard City Council has asked that an advisory vote be taken to determine if
in part the voters of Tigard favor such a proposal and method of financing.
The advisory vote, or an advisory survey, will be completed by mid 1983.
It is vital to the City of Tigard that the downtown business area become a
major commercial center again. As Tigard has grown dramatically over the past
decade, the downtown has been neglected. A need now exists for the area to
become a focal point of economic activity with a better use of land uses a
paramount goal. The T.U.R.A. Advisory Committee has recommended that a
special Central Business District (CBD) zoning district be established which
-20-
will limit the uses allowed in the zoning district to commercial and
residential. Although this will result in several businesses becoming
non-conforming uses, the overall purpose of the zoning district will be
served. Over a period of years the character of the downtown area will change
sufficiently to again make the area a commercial center which also houses the
governmental offices of the community.
The City will also encourage high density residential development in the CBD.
The CBD zoning district will allow high density development as well as mixed
uses, that is, residential development above first floor commercial uses. The
mix of residential and commercial use will provide the proper character for a
suburban commercial"downtown. Tigard intends to create a downtown with the
proper mix of retail, professional offices, civic, and residential uses to
make the downtown an economically viable core area without sacrificing
community standards. Some community standards will be revised for the
revitalization area only to encourage more innovative land use Flexible
standards will be administered within a program of proposal review by T.U.R.A.
to insure compliance of T.U.R.A. area development proposals with the
revitalization plan.
In order that the downtown revitalization plan is successful, the City will
channel public resources, as available, to make improvements to the core. A
proposed civic center was rejected by voters in 1982. It is expected that a
modified proposal either for acquisition or lease of expanded office, library,
and shop space will be pursued during the coming years. As Tigard continues
to grow the responsibility for providing urban services results in a need for
additional municipal personnel. Tigard's efforts to respond to this need with
satisfactory municipal facilities will be directed into the downtown area.
This commitment should provide some impetus to private commercial
development. Already a major lread j shopping center is planned for the CBD which
]or PP g
itself should spark further revitalization in the -form of rehabilitation of
existing structures and construction of new commercial facilities.
The City through its economic development program will focus on promoting the
downtown area. Of prime importance is the City's commitment t provide
incentives to existing businesses in the area to upgrade and expand. A solid
base now exists which given assistance through public investments, namely
resolution of traffic problems, creation of new parking facilities, and better
maintenance of public facilities should be receptive to improvement.
Municipal Codes - Within the Tigard Community Development Code modifications
have been made to existing processes to streamline development application
periods, to provide flexibility in some land use areas, and to allow for
maximum economic use of land. These changes have been proposed, however, only
after protections have been built in for the environment as well as existing
uses and residential neighborhoods. Since Tigard has experienced steady
economic growth during a period of nation-wide economic stagnation, the City
is not forced into a compromising position where it must accept economic
development at all cost. Rather, the City is in a position where it
recognizes the need for encouraging economic development, but, only while
maintaining the high standards which have made Tigard an attractive place for
new economic growth.
-21-
As Tigard continues to grow economically filling up the vacant spaces which
remain, the City will continue to preserve the integrity of residential
neighborhoods. Steps will be taken to continue City policy of buffering
/1 commercial and industrial areas from residential. Existing restrictions and.
standards have proven to be adequate. The City will maintain the development
codes which describe standards for landscaping and buffering between
residential and other uses. Encroachment of commercial and industrial uses' •
into residential areas will be prohibited as the City will protect existing
neighborhoods.
•
•
1
-22-
APO fl A Po LA cam '
Page 10
9.1.2 THE CITY SHALL ESTABLISH A BALANCED AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM WHICH COMPLIMENTS THE LAND USE PLAN AND IS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE
ENERGY IMPACTS.
PORELCAVIEW
9.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE JelideNSMIG WHICH EMPHASIZES SOUND
ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City will encourage public and private programs that offer
weatherization and energy conservation programs, e.g. tax credits,
low-interest weatherization loans, etc.
2. The Tigard Community Development Code will allow for a variety of
housing unit types in most residential development districts which
have proven to be energy efficient, e.g. , common-wall or clustering of
dwelling units.
3. The City will locate higher densities in proximity to existing and
potential transit routes.
4. The City will, in the Tigard Community Development Code, allow for
more flexibility in structure siting to provide for maximum solar
exposure.
5. The City will review the feasibility of implementing a solar access
ordinance and wind generation provisions.
6. The City will cooperate with both public and private agencies that
make use of site development and architectural techniques using
natural elements for heating and cooling in all developments.
7. The Tigard. Community Development Code will allow for mixed use
developments which will support a reduction in traffic trip generation.
8. The City will coordinate with and support public and private planning
efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass
transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter
purposes.
. ow 6:;,-1E g\vng 1 _ ) ,
Wove vim lo Pr 2 3, l �F,2 NOV 231982 LI
10 : Ti p a rci Pia cn v►j 4.7 C° i'. 7 117 i S 5 /01"7 CITY OF TIGARD
N c he r o / �j P,LANi !IN94DEPTj
From e / oc !"latithit regaHiZ6 /0
„ Qt, t) . 7 imp /eoleo '/i Sir_2fe y c
01. 1 E oev-J/ CPllv►pre eti5ive Pla t
NP 0 5 recd h°► rM e ocIS .7LLta/- 714 le 9‘47C1/00
S f rr f - yr tie c.I ra f c-1 e of Oc b4' r- 1 .Z
�1
he re I,/ 'aced' h7 e iv.i/o wi'oy
0 , 30 L oc o f/o (/1 -1 rl / er; a r e - /
p A �"p,
•..... ' -4 -r,.. ���''�`� ..1 - s % - j - - - - . I C
�.-°"�
------ ----------:::41- --tr-01---- � • M ' N yvi , it l
Ve / c- u / ar fY- ave/ To orcee a coo 5erve __
etle " g/ e
Our re v5akii- l5 42/ *ie /c ca %cii4a/ cr,• 7LE' r/a
-PU r e acf 7y e of /a oil u5 5 iaufo' I?e 9//2eC "'fed
wj 7G1ipi *6e sec 76/a-i of die p/a' ac/c/ re 55717
) a 71 ),pe ®f cf e ve/7 144 ec/I'f 7141 15 +.,.j// 144 lie /'t
^e a fey- 7"or bo 4 c/T/z kis a001 0rr(c/ /5 io locz e
he c r1' e ri'2 w; 71-61/1.7 "tie p I.s . 1 7c i- is
ap, roe ria74e riGl 14ecec5'av:7, 7 ePct, al?/I c d 7e sec X/0.,
cv Llavld cv /' 2 ie 2 S 'f/"Le 1/7�v 71-Cie oo / "i
ton /v1/ fr/ ��[e n e c e S 5 a r/ V e Ii/c c,Q/ a.r 71-r-2. e/ 1
ore/0v` l-O ccaN5e i-ve eUre r ./ aHc./ reduce
a 1 w Mo (/ u T I'a a . ...J e c o yr d /7 , l o c 274/0 kr a/ c i°/74,rj 4
'co r fit- °I-4e r lZ fle0S of de ve/o/v froevl i .5 lroci/c/
a c/d I"e 5.5 f ti/s cf c7 2l 9 S/h c e 7�Gi ece 8 re o f/
P
pale /1/PQ 3 4 p/Ai-,,„„ .„ Co'- ..cam a,..-7,,cl',�e, //aV 3d /9r .
.L ,j I
.1ije ale s !-%cal a fioy "For Ve tic u( ar 1-v' et ve(.
We re � re7- 7-ha7- we 6 re v 1 a6/e To a Par
r
Ia, PrsoHv7� clue fo �� 6ir!Lr�'fe a�-raves
ll r
O ri'�tr e )e fr To re e v/ew e ca, ti/, Yell 5 've
�7 lJc, akG� c:/c/ fc, /-4e VIl ro c,4, G ! / 4e 'II
a 0 5 /v/"'44 1ial,'c1'y t.ve art aso
_/ 2
Mee T(�N. ',o +teri'�i �tTL. t�a. e ve✓-1 1 f you liayP,.
aN� ctVes � `a +45 .� xov 1,1�i8y cotifae is �"-
c ? //,`", C,' ./7 6 3 -- 1/ 7/,
1
1
aa c7-2,,,, -c..- . 0 ' /-rte
i
December 6, 1982.
Page One of Two
Tigard Planning Staff
Tigard Planning Commission
Tigard City Council
City of Tigard, Oregon, 97223 .
Dear Memberss
PART ONE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
This letter is pertaining to the zoning changes and the
boundry line of the Central Business District (CBD) .
In NPO #1 book, page 44, it says Fanno Creek provides a
natural buffer between the neighborhoods residential and business
district. I have a map from the City of Tigard, exhibit 6, which
shows the CBD line coming across Fanno Creek and the Greenway into
an established residential area along Hill Street which is a low
density single family area and going on southeast along the Green-
way adjacent another low density area of the Greenway. The' CBI. Line
shoGild be adjusted to the other side of the Greenway where the
Central Business District is located so the low density single
family areas will have Fanno Creek and the Greenway as a buffer
between them and the high density CBD line as stated above in the
NPO f#1 book. Also, an adjustment could be made to remove the new
proposed shopping center near Main and Ash from the residential
area. It is very vital to maintain Fanno Creek and the Greenway
as a buffer to retain the character of the establishes low density
single family neighborhoods .
PART TWO. . . . .ZONE CHANGES
There are some low density single family home areas that are
proposed for a higher density. Four units per acre to seven units
per acre and some areas even higher including apartments . The NPO
#1 book, page 5, says that apartments in Tigard out number the
houses . On page 11, it says that future development should be
sensitive to the concern of t ' tizens . Page 16, Policy #6, says
the single family characte of the area designated on the plan map
as urban low density residential is viewed as a positive asset to
be retained. Low density is 1 to 5 units per acre. Medium density
is 6 to 12 units per acre including apartments . The residents in
the low density areas such as the Omara farm and all of the sur-
rounding areas were zoned single family
low density with 4 units per
acre . The proposed 7 units per acre on the Omara triangle would be
a 75% increase and some other areas even higher.
The residents in these low density areas bought their homes
with the understanding that their homes and the surrounding area
would be single family low density because it was zoned that way on
the map. If these zones are changed, it will betray all of these
residents who purchased homes in this low density neighborhood. It
would ruin the character and livability of this and the surrounging
neighborhoods. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan book, page 33 , Policy
No 6. 3. 1, says new development will be of the same type and density
in order to protect the character of existing neighborhoods.
Page Two of Two:
Please consider us the citizens of Tigard who bought homes
with the understanding that we would have Fanno Creek and the
Greenway as a buffer between us and the Central Business District.
NOT have the buffer between us destroyed by moving the CBD line
across the Greenway into a single family low density neighborhood.
Please keep the CBD line on the other side of the Greenway buffer
where the businessdistrict is so we can retain the quality,
livability and character of our existing and established
neighborhood. By putting yourselves in our position in buying a
home in a low density residential area because it was zoned that
way on the map, you will understand that we are the ones who will
suffer if the zones are changed to higher density.
In closing, please leave our residential area low density
single family, so we can retain the character of our neighborhood.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
Since ely,
Paul and Gloria Johnson
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: William A. MonahanP 0 N-
DATE: December 2, 1982
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Element
Attached please find copies of the various elements of the proposed compre-
hensive plan which you have not previously received. Please note that the
entire plan is comprised of nine elements as well as the Findings, Policies
and Implementation Strategies document. You will also be asked to consider
the proposed,Community Development Code, Comprehensive Plan Map, and
District Map.
Please refer to the following list of documents which illustrates those
that you have received, those attached, and the order in what they will
be considered.
RECEIVED ATTACHED
Citizen Involvement X
Energy X
Air, Water and Land Recourses Quality X
Economy X
Public Facilities and Services X
Natural Features and Open Space X
Transportation X
Housing X
Urbanization X
Findings, Policies and
Implementation Strategies X
Comprehensive Plan Map X
Official Development District and Map (to be distributed later)
Community Development Code X.
Please let me know if you require an additional copy of any of the documents
listed above.
• '
I .
•
.•
-• .
•
..•
tossi*6wilIwe)
diginnale .• •
•
4 •
•
1
t, o
T I G A R D P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 7, 1982
1. Vice-President Speaker called the meeting to order ato7:40 P.M. The
meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room, 10865 S.W.
Walnut St. , Tigard, Oregon.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice-President Speaker, Commissioners Edin,
Christen, Leverett, Owens, Bonn, and Moen.
Excused absence: President Tepedino
Staff: William Monahan, Director of Planning and Development;
Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner; Elizabeth Newton,
Associate Planner; Frank Currie, Public Works Director;
Adrienne Brockman, Legal Counsel; Diane Jelderks, Clerk Typist.
3. Minutes from November 23, 1982 were considered. Commissioner Christen
moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to approve the minutes as°,Oresented.
Commissioner Moen arrived at 7:42 P.M.
4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
• Vice-President Speaker announced the Public Hearing Item 5.2
Subdivision Application S7-82 had been postponed.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• Vice-President Speaker opened the Public Hearings by reading the usual
statement of authority for the procedure to be followed in the meeting.
5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS
A request by various citizens to be appointed as members of NPO #1 3
9 y Pp
and 6.
e Director of Planning and Development Monahan made the Interview Team's
recommendation for appointment of the following individuals to the
appropriate NPO.
Michael A. Smith NPO #3
David Atkinson NPO #6
Carolyn Eadon NPO #1
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
a No one appeared to speak.
illo •
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
a Vice-President Speaker stated he was on the Interview Team and again
was delighted with the quality of the individuals coming forward to
participate.
e Commissioner Bonn moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to forward the
names of the three individuals to City Council with recommendation for
appointment.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Commission present.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC HEARINGS
e Director of Planning and Development Monahan explained the need for
the Comprehensive Plan was to meet LCDC goals and guidelines. He
continued that Jeremy Coursolle had been hired specifically to work on
the Comprehensive Plan. Jeremy has been reviewing documents which
have been guiding the Commission. He has been trying to take seven
plans and make them into one. Staff has been activating the NPO's and
meeting on a regular basis. At times this process has been difficult
due to the lack of available resources and also trying to be
responsive to the needs of the community.
The City Council has granted a 45-day extension per a request by the
Park Board and NPO's for additional time to digest the information
presented.
The schedule for tonight will be item 5.3 Air, Water and Land
Resources; 5.4 Economy; and 5.5 Public Facilities and SErvices. On
Thursday, December 9, they would hold a public hearing for Housing for
public input only. No action would be taken by the Planning
Commission. Beginning January 18th, there would be public hearings on
Natural Features and Open Space; Transportation; Housing; and
Urbanization. City Council would have their hearings on January 25,
26, and 27. Sometime towards the end of January or the first of
February there would be hearings on the Tigard Community Development
Code.
5.3 CPA 7-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES
QUALITY.
a Associated Planner Coursolle explained the Air, Water and Land
Resources Quality addressed LCDC #6. It covers the issue of solid
waste disposal which overlaps with the Public Facilities and Services
element. His resources were DEQ, Metropolitan Service District and
Washington County Planning Department. The element is geared to the
years 1980 through 2000. Associate Planner Coursolle then read the
proposed language changes to POLICY 4.1.1 and 4.3.1.
e NPO REPORTS
Lou Ane Mortensen, Chairperson for NPO #3 stated that they did not
have enough time to review the document changes and had no input.
PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
41, •
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Gloria Johnson, 9300 S.W. Hill St. ., was concerned about the trees,
natural vegetation and greenways. She was not certain if this was the
appropriate time to speak.
a Staff felt the issue would be better addressed during the public
hearing for Natural Features and Open Space.
•
® Dr. Joseph T. Hart, 10993 S.W. North Dakota St. , thought he might be
premature, however, he wanted the Commission to know he felt his
property was designated open space. He had submitted a letter to
Associate Planner Coursolle outlining the use of the land. He wanted
the opportunity to come and speak again at the appropriate time.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
PLANNING COMMISS16N DISCUSSION AND ACTION
® Commissioner Owens asked what type of recommendation was staff looking
for.
® Associate Planner Coursolle stated the Commission could approve the
element as is and forward to the City Council; approve with
modifications and forward to the City Council; or send back to staff
to revise and resubmit.
s Commissioners reviewed pages of concern with staff.
• no Commissioner Bonn questioned NPO #3's submission regarding the adding
of locational criteria. Staff replied this would be addressed later
on in another element.
• Lengthy discussion followed regarding the use of septic tanks versus
the public sewer system with new development.
® Commissioner Bonn moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to recommend to
the City Council approval of CP A 7-82 with corrections, modifications
and the revision as outlined in the memorandum from the Department of
Planning and Development.
The motion carried by unanimous approval of Commissioners present.
5.3 CPA 8-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: ECONOMY
o Director of Planning and Development Monahan explained the Economy
Element addressed LCDC Goal #9 which reads: "To diversify and improve
the economy of the state." He has attempted to address conditions
regionally and statewide. Monahan read a new finding and Policy
#5.1.5 into the record.
e Economy element was reviewed page by page inserting correction and
additions.
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
A
4110 410
• Commissioner Moen questioned if the Planning Commission would be
acting on staff's modified element or the one they had received
previously. Director of Planning and Development stated they would be
III
acting on the modified element.
• Discussion followed that Policy 5.1.5 was too general.
• Commissioner Owens noted that much of the Action Plan is repeated
almost word for word in the Implementation Strategy. How is the
Action Plan different from the Implementation Strategy.
• Director Monahan stated it is only an elaboration of what we intend to
accomplish with the implementation strategies.
• Commissioner Owens questioned if the information in both the
Implementation Strategies and Economy would become outdated by the
time the review period happens. If so, is there a way to update on a
current basis.
• Director Monahan stated that the inventory of economic information
will be updated within the economic development program. Staff will
try to have as such up-to-date information and additions to provide to
• prospective developers on a continuing basis. One of the goals of the
Economic Development Plan would be to maintain an inventory of
buildable land in the community.
to Further discussion followed between staff and the Commission regarding
language being appropriate in specific sections of the Economy Element.
RECESS: 9:30 P.M.
RECONVENE: 9:43 P.M.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• JB Bisho P, 10505 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , #303, was concerned that there was
nothing in the Economy Element regarding a Capital Improvement Plan.
Presently there are not any existing policies to address this issue
and felt it was time to start thinking toward that direction.
• John Butler, NPO #1 Chairperson, stated that NPO #1 felt that Policy
5.1.4 needed some rewriting to include buffering. Also, it appears
that Policy 5.1.4 should be under Urbanisation rather than Economy.
• Mrs. Gloria Johnson, 9300 S.W. Hill St. , questioned the high density
in the Central Business District in relationship to the residential
area. She could fine nothing in the document regarding buffering.
• Director of Planning and Development Monahan stated that same issue
was discussed at the TURA Advisory Committee meeting. He suggested
Mrs. Johnson become involved in NPO #1 and also attend the TURA
meetings.
PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
4110 9
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
to Commissioner Owens asked Mr. Bishop if Policy 5.1.3 contained what he
was looking for. Mr. Bishop stated Policy 5.1.3 wall site specific and
he was looking for an overall City policy.
s Discussion followed regarding adding another Finding and Policy.
to Commissioner Moen wanted to know what kind of language Mr. Bishop was
proposinga Mr. Bishop stated he was looking for strong encouragement
and active coordination from the City for forming Commercial and
Industrial LIDs.
• Further discussion followed regarding Local Improvement Districts and
initiating a policy encouraging and coordinating LIDs.
• Consensus of the Commission was to have staff prepare a Finding,
Policy and Implementation Strategy based on information discussed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED •
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
co Commissioner Bonn questioned if the issue of buffering brought up by
o
NPO #1 under Policy 5.1.4 was covered elsewhere in the elements.
• Associate Planner Coursolle stated there are three areas where
buffering can be addressed. One is the Development Code; second would
be to look at buffering policies; and the third could be Chapter 11 of
the Finding , Policies, and Implementation Strategies. It could also
•• be dealt with through an NPO #1 Policy.
• Commissioner Speaker favored staff working on a buffering policy, as
this is obviously a strong concern.
• Associate Planner Coursolle added that there is already in the Housing
document a stepping down process from more intensive uses to a single
family residential area. For example, next to a single family
residence a duplex or two attached units would be compatible.
• Commissioner Edin encouraged having a policy. He had chaired the CCI
O. meeting where they had discussed these issues and he feels it is a
significant enough issue to have a policy regarding buffering.
1-
a. • Associate Planner Coursolle felt that this might be best addressed
under locational criteria where you can set down standards for
!�1
specific areas.
• Commissioner Moen felt that the buffering and high density issues
might be better addressed in another section and supported leaving
Policy 5.1.4 as it is in the Economy Element.
• Commissioner Speaker & Edin agreed with Commissioner Moen.
• Commissioner Bonn questioned whether they should wait until staff had
submitted language for the LID.
PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
A
• Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to approve
and forward to the City Council CPA 8-82 Economy, subject to review
and insertion of language on LIDs and including corrections and
additions submitted by the Commission.
The motion carried by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present.
5.5 CPA 8-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
• Commissioner Owens questioned if the document distributed at the
meeting had substantially different wording than the previous document
submitted.
• Associate Planner Coursolle explained that the policies are the
primary wording changes, is different from the one in the blue
document, and the policies relate to CPA 13-82, Findings, Policies and
Implementation Strategies which has had subsequent updates.
• Discussion followed regarding holding the hearing over until Thursday,
December 9, 1982.
Commissioner Owens excused at 10:20 P.M. ;‘,
e Associate Planner Coursolle stated that the Public Facilities and
Services addresses LCDC Goal #11 - Public Facilities and Services.
This element includes storm drainage, water service, police
protection, fire protection, private utilities, schools, health, local
government facilities, library and solid waste disposal and
recycling. The element includes a number of charts relating to
existing status of various service districts.
The supplement, which consists of policies, relates to the policies in
the element CPA 13-82. When the original Public Facilities and
Services document was drafted, staff had as many as 60 to 70
policies. Staff was advised by the City Attorney's office that they
could inundate the City with policies and still be spinning their
wheels. This brought about the drafting of the Findings, Policies and
Implementation Strategies document. It is updated a new information
and input is evaluated.
• Discussion followed regarding how to proceed with the new information.
• Associate Planner Coursolle outlined how the document was combined and
explained the types of changes that had been made.
• Commissioner Speaker questioned if CCI had seen this document.
Associate Planner Coursolle stated that the CCI had not seen the
revisions.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• Bob Santee, Tigard Water District, informed the Commission that a lot
of the information in the Element under WATER SERVICE is outdated,
erroneous and does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. He
PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
6
illo •
continued that it does not address the primary problem of water
supply. He offered his assistance to the staff in revising the draft
to make it accurate. He then reviewed several items in the document
• which were not accurate.
• Commissioner Bonn asked Mr. Santee if there was any discussion going
on between the Tigard Water District and the Metzger Water District
regarding merging. Mr. Santee explained how Metzger is on a separate
water system, which made it almost impossible to merge.
• • Commissioner Bonn also wanted to know if Metropolitan Service District
had any responsibility with water. Mr. Santee replied no they do not.
. • John Butler, NPO #1 Chairperson, felt he was at a disadvantage as he
did not have a copy of the addendum. He wanted more time to see what
types of changes had been made.
• Bob Bledsoe, representing NPO #3, stated that the Commission had
received a copy of their proposed changes, however, these were ..done
before staff had made additional changes.
• i Commissioner Speaker stated he had problems with multiple
•
presentations. He wanted to know when this element could be
reconsidered tolive Mr. Santee time to work with staff so we could
have current information.
• Discussion followed on how to handle execution of this element.
• Commissioner Speaker moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to continue
the public hearing on Saturday, December 11, 1982 at 1:30 P.M.
Motion carried by unanimous vote of Commissioners present.
• The Housing element would be heard at a public hearing on Thursday,
• December 9, 1982, which would only consist of an overview of the
Housing Element and public input.
• Bob Bledsoe, NPO Representative, informed the Commission that NPO #3
had submitted numerous changes regarding housing policies pertaining
to policies in the Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies.
• Commissioner Bonn expressed his concern that there would be enough
time for staff to work with Mr. Santee. Staff said there would be
sufficient time for the public hearing on Saturday, December 11, 1982.
• Staff was requested to have current copies of the Public Facilities
and Services document available Wednesday, December 8, 1982 for pick
up at City Hall.
• Meeting Adjourned: 11:08 P.M.
1 / /
Diane Jeld• . s, Planning Secretary
ATTEST: L
o ', , ,
we •5
Cliff SpJ .,' er, anning Comm. Vice-President
(0030P
PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 7, 1982
ox
410 411'
November. 2.), 1982
Dear' lanninr ' Comn�;ission and City Tigard Planning Director;
copies to Council members, Aril NP() c airmen aria members, City Atty.
A letter sent to you on October 11, 1982 told of a
need for an ordinance to cover "accessory buildings" .
2 agriculture or light manufacturing industrial 4 pole metal
unattached structures were put up in ft -10 residential established
neighborhood. The building permit application allowing this
•
structure was dated 8-1-80 shows : Occupancy PM- 1; Land Use Zone R-10;
Bldg. Type 5(S)N; Fire Zone .3; Plan check by dwh. New structure is
indicated and an X is marked indicating usage as storage. Slab floor;
height 12 ' (appears much higher) ; 1 story, area 576 and value $4,000.00.
Setbacks front 81, rear 65, left side 50- and right side lop .
Accessory buildings may be put up not to exceed 1,000 square
feet. There are no restrictions as to materials, design, just
consideration given on setbacks to qualify for a permit? Considered
' temporary° buildings these structures do not address the Oregon
Uniform Building Code?
Even though a permit was given for ' storage' ingress
and egress rock roads were placed on the 10' side yards for
vehicle entry/ Vehicles are kept within this structural addition
against Fantasy Hill deed restriction which only allows attached
garage with 2 cars?
Once a landowner has broken the deed restriction it is up
to surrounding neighbors to bring forth a civil law suit. This has
cost us close to $500.00. and we are told will be close to $5,000.00
if we pursue a course to have this illegal structure removed.
The restriction must be unanimously agreed to in our effort to
renew the 1985 deed limitation. This is impossible to get being
several neighbors have put up structures in the past few years
illegally. The lawyer suggested an ordinance would correct problems
of this type and assure homeowners of their rights without having to
go' thru civil courts.
Beaverton and Lake Oswego allow less square footage for
accessory buildings, lower heights than City of Tigard does? Both
these cities have sight review design to adhere to by checking out
view, air,light, as it affects adjacent property? Require fencing
and landscaping to reduce noise or glare and maintain the property
in a character in keeping with the surrounding area? How does the
new Fire Code amended in 1980 address accessory structures?
Another matter to address at this time would be "dish"
type antenna. Lake Oswego has in their ordinance to be placed in
rear yards, on the ground, and must be screened by landscaping.
Hoping you will place accessory buildings under review
for an ordinance that will address the above concerns. Currently
there are no regulations on design or materials for accessory
buildings. Accessory buildings should not be unsightly or create
disharmony to its locations. immediate action on these matters
will be appreciated by homeowners in this vicinity and certainly
throughout Tigard' s residential areas. A
� �!'
--
'440 uNivtitsAL 511,1111i t
III .
ENTERTAINMENT sysTEms
INTRODUCES A NEW ONCEPT IN
MULTIPLE HOME TELEVISION
Nov EvERT ROKE sera have 24 CHANNELS of satellite television --® including
. NHO ESPN CI.NEMAX, CABLE NEWS, NETWORK, SHOWTIME
end many others — FOR LESS THAN CABLE TV COSTS
The but pert is that you and your neighbors 0Wlif the complete
system -- NO mom= CABLE COSTS THAT 00 ON FOREVER!
w
Call
(503) 684 -2997 for more information
and a representative sill oonteot you.
IINIVMSAL SATELLITE WTE°RTAI M 2rr SYSTEMS 13015 S.W. Peoifio Hwy., Tigard,, OR 97223
(503) 584-2997
4,• 'SILDING PERMIT APPLE ,ION TIGARLI DATE Ai :, , 09_1_ �u•A• ,•
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APP MS FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREI ICATED BUILDER PHONE ' ~'
OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING P c. •NS AND SPECIFICATIONS, OWNER PHONE "° .,I ; 1
r � F �; 3R 3t'tL LOT NO. �� ;��i•"_'Y � �
OWNER ..I't:i c 1:...a A �i �i1 JOB ADDRESS �,:', :0 .1
ARCHITECaK
• :ENGINEER
B ILDER 'r a(-On it <1,' "cud°°r'J ADD ESS.i. 01--:∎ P r Li. iit+� . DESIGNER 3rar1tlr% Para ',.itructur
STRUCTURE 0 NEW 0 REMOD C 0 DDITION 0 ' IR 0 RENEWAL • 0 FIRE DAMAGE 0 DEMOLITION
d RESIDENCE 0 COMM 0 EDUCATIO Al,• 0 GOV'T III RELIGIOUS 0 PA 10 0 CAR PORT 0 GARAGE 0 STORAGE 0 SLAB 0 FENCE
OCCUPANCY ___ I LAND USE ZONE s 10 EL',t.TYPE °�s� Fl° ZONF PLAN CHECK BY di-4h • HEAT
•
Construct pole structuEc: torat a •Dui1d1ng, all par plans and coda.
SEWER PERMIT II
OCC,LOAD I •FLOOR LOAD S L C b HEIGHT .12 - NO.STORIES 1 AREA 5713 NO.BEDROOMS — VALRJEt j�ti�� .
• BUILDING DEPARTMENT . SET BACKS FRONT 0.i I REAR v J LEFT SIDE b 0 RIGHT SIDE lg
^u 2'i•00 • THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE,ZONING
REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES,AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE
14.00 WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATION§AND IN COMPLIANCE
WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE
Sub-total 4 a RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS.CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS
• LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING.
1 . n • .. .
SDC.
Total
PDC.) APPLICANT OR AGENT
By
t Receipt No. v ADDRESS PHONE t.
410 Aft'
December If 1982
TO: All Interested Parties
FROM: Department of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
The City of Tigard is now winding down its initial drafting efforts
of the Comprehensive Plan Report. The completed draft will include
nine report documents, a policy and implementation strategies docu-
ment and various implementing ordinances, one of which will be the
Tigard Community Development Code.
The nine individual report documents will cover the following topics:
'Citizen Involvement; Natural Features and Open Space; Air, Water
and Land Quality; Economy; Housing; Public Facilities and Services;
Transportation, Energy and Urbanization.
The seventh of these Comprehensive Plan Reports, TRANSPORTATION
describes an inventory of existing Transportation systems, needed
improvements to meet traffic demands • at the year 2000 and the
City's coordination role with the Metropolitan Service District,
Oregon Department of Transportation and Washington County. In
addition, the report recommends findings, policies and implementation
strategies which set forth direction for the City. ,
The TRANSPORTATION Comprehensive Plan Report is now being reviewed
by the Neighborhood Planning Organizations, Planning Commission
and City Council members. In addition, the Committee for Citizen
Involvement has been meeting'on a weekly basis . to discuss all of
the Comprehensive Plan issues. The exact date of these meetings
are available at City Hall.
This entire document will be reviewed by the Planning Commission
in a public hearing beginning January 18, 1983, at Fowler Junior
High School.
If you have any questions concerning the TRANSPORTATION Comprehensive
Plan Report, please contact the Tigard City Hall at 639-4171.
410 410
December 1, 1982
TO: All Interested Parties
FROM: Department of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: URBANIZATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
The City of Tigard is now winding down its initial drafting efforts
of the Comprehensive Plan Report. The completed draft will include
nine report documents, a policy and implementation strategies docu-
ment and various implementing ordinances , one of which will be the
Tigard Community Development Code.
The nine individual report documents will cover the following topics:
Citizen Involvement; Natural Features and Open Space; Air, Water
and Land Quality; Ecomony; Housing; Public Facilities and Services;
Transportation, Energy and Urbanization.
The ninth of these Comprehensive Plan Reports, URBANIZATION develops
a a framework within which all development activities have to be
coordinated with Washington County and regional jurisdictions. It
also integrates and balances all of the other available land resources
in terms of the needs expressed by other
p y goals, mainly: Housing,
Economy, Public Facilities and Services, Transporation, Energy,
Natural Features and Open Spaces.
The URBANIZATION Comprehensive Plan Report is now being reviewed
by the Neighborhood Planning Organizations, Planning Commission
and City Council members. In addition, the Committee for Citizen
Involvement has been meeting on a weekly basis to discuss all of
the Comprehensive Plan issues. The exact date of these meetings
are available at City Hall.
This entire document will be reviewed by the Planning Commission
in a public hearing beginning January 18, 1983 , at Fowler Junior
High School.
If you have any questions concerning the URBANIZATION Comprehensive
Plan Report, please contact the Tigard City Hall at 639-4171.