Planning Commission Packet - 08/10/1982 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
AGENUA
TIGARD PLANNING COMNlISSION
AUGUST 10, 19£32 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTUIZE ROOM
10685 S.W. Walnut Street - 'Tigard, Qregon
�
1. Ca11 to Order. and Roll Ca11
2. PUBI,IC HEARTNGS .
2.1 ZOA 4-82 Amandment to Chapter 18.84 Administrative Procedures
2.2 QRDINANC� 82- S.ign Code .timeline .extension>"amendment.
3. F70RKSHOP - City Council, PXannix�g CaIIUnission and Neighborhood Planning Organizations
a. Proposed Bu11 Mountain GPO �� 4 p1an, presentation by
Washington Cotxnty Planning Staff.
b. Compsehesni�e Pl�n Overview: Purpose and Process
o LGDC goals and guide�.in�
o Gompre'hensive P1an and Develapment Co�es
o General Comprehensive Plan versus Specific Comprehensive P2an
o Amendments and Update Cycle
- five years
- two years
- semi-annual
o Planning Administrative Froce,dures
-- City Council
- Hearin�s Officer
- Planning Director
c. Presentation by �Iearings Officer
d. Status and Timeline
a What we h:aveo.. . . .?
o Wh.ere Gre're going.. . .?
o What"s left to do. ..?
4. Small. GrouFs - Discuss the fol�.owi,ngc
n Ro1e of Neighbarhood Planning Organizations, Plannin� Comznission
and City Council in the Comprehensive P7.an Revision P�ocess.
o What can each group do to help the Citiy mee� the givan time�ine.
5. Discuss Que�tions With Whole Group.
6. Adjourn
l _ --
:� TENTATIVE AGENDA
AUGUST 10, 198
CITY , PLA�TNING COMMT_SSIC►N AND I3P0 WORKSHQP
Fowler lunior High School
50865 �S.W. Walnut � Lecture Room
7:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING (Planning Commission)
1• Amendment to Chapxer 18�$4 �- Adm�.nistrative ProcQdure ZOA 4-82
WORKSHOP iTUDY IT�NIS
1. Hearin�s Offi�er Prese�rtatian - Role c�f �iexrings af£icer
2. Ccs�nprekiensive P1.an Revis:ion Process
3. Dis�us:sion nf Comp�shensive Plan E;Lements drafted to ct�te.
4. Role of NPO's a.n I'1an�:ing Process
5. Presentation �f �3u11 Mountaiiz� CP0 ��4 Pl,an.
'
I
,
_
AFFODAV�T OF �U�LICA°����
STATE OF ORFGON, �
ss.
COUN'I'Y �DF W.ASHINGTON,
I J�hn Cd. MarlinP_ _. _ . __...__ __
_ _- . _ _ _ _..__ _ - .
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisner _...._.._____.._.
of The `]'igard Times, a newspaper of. generai circulation, as defined
by ORS 193.010 anti 193.070, published zt "I'igard, in the aforesaid county and
state; ihat the ]ep,al notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was
published in the enEire issue nf said newspaper for __.pl�e successive and
consecutiv�, weeks in llie folluwing issu � . __ July_29� __1982__.- __
- _ _. . ._.. - - _ _._. __._�_.__. _
_. _ -i.�* --. . _. . ___...
,� ` {�gii ture)
,�
Suhscrit�ed and sworn to before me t14 s 3�'�_ _ __.. day of __
� Angust_ _ _ I9 87_ � �
�� L
�_" `.�
, ;-
- _ _ ,'�.�r%C� ,y���"'�—��'"'F,?,,�_
� l tJotary Pub!ic o_' Idregon
14Yy comrni.ssSt:� exp:res FPj7._ .24 _ 7.9 �6.
E r.
�'�e� %a���E��d�,�s��� t��'d,`�4`�`` ��� � � r -� � �r �.` t�i�@@?�
s(���w�v�ebaiaa�.t �g.�y.°�&��q�p9��y�,.�5.!��fa� � ' ��{4��'� ?�� � g��p�
36�'L.'+bSi �M 1��71LD 4n'3 K✓�SA ,... YP^ � ;���i.••�+ .. .i���#����i�dC"�µic+"
. �
����a������������ :�����ti�,�. .,. . ���'�������-
�aza. .. .
���������� ,
5.I 5lg�.��e��v��to�t�--���t�A�Z�Q���
a� ��qa��,�Sy �ka� �l��+ mft`T@��e� k� �tsv9�t�m� 5� �d�. 'Fit�� fl�9 a�R t9��
`Ti�trd�ta�i€����t�iY�3t��.
�.2�ne�drruu�ne��(°)a�e����"�s.�4-�-�e3�ei�s��s�affi�ae Y�r�edetx���Ar�4��
.� ges��a� b� $.�� ���� m� '%'��a�e� tA ���era� �66�p9�x fl�.£�� �n�R gYa� '�l��s��
�+S��t��i��,' tm����a��a:�$la:g����s�ti� x�:��i�9c+�4�s�a��r¢54��ta�i�����
��vi�i��..
��9i���a�a.ax�a�a��.w e��sx�sa�a��«r�>P����s���.dt t�t�ce�la����,Y�����.�E�r
�������v���d��:ao .
'�+✓�rt��i,���:s�d� ���aa�b �7�#k� ���� �s�tl�syi➢, f"��a��������fa�a� ��d �J�
����a`l��g�� ,
�.f��T��2���v�1PB���geat�a�cs�B��u�,�a.� . '
2.��t�tsQ��9'3 6��'°�����g Il��a.t���
�i,�i?���������i��399�����ffi�3��'���. . _.
`�"�����'-��«�R�3������Q a��i�
�
PURPOSE AND PROCESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE k'LAN
PURPOSE
"Court strike ciown. City zoning decision - no Comprehensive P7.an"
"City loses federal dollars for laek �f a complete Comprehensive plan"
"City Council annaurtces the need for a new Comp?-ehensive Plan as requi�ed
by state law"
''D�velogers ca11 City Comprehensive Plan outmoded - stops new investment"
These are some of the headlines that might ap�ear in a local press indicatizig a
City°s n.eed for a city wide Gompreh�r�sive Plan. As indicated in these ficti�ious
headlines, conditions within a municipality itself are an important generating
force for a comp-rehensive plannin� effort.
In addition, the courts iizcreasinglq have lonked for a rationale behind a Cit•,�'s
zoning ordinance that can be used to weight the relative znerits of zone ehanges
or to justify the costs that compliance with the zoning ordinance may require.
Ttxe Comprehensiye Plan articulates long raizge development goals far a communi�y,
against which short term zoning administration can be measured.
u e un t' s erformed b a Cit Com rehesnive Plan are man and com lex
Altho gh th f c ion p y y p y P ,
the pu.rposes of a Comprehensive Plan can be grouped into three general categories.
1. First, a Comprehensive plan is an expression aE what a community wants. It is
a stat-ement of goals, a listirig of ebjectives and a vision of wri.at might be.
2. Second, the Comprehensive P1an, o�.1ce prepared serves as a guide for deci�ion- I�
making. It provides the means for guiding and influencing the many pub�.ic
and private decisions that create the future of the city, an.
3. Third, the plan represents the fulfillment of a legal requirement. Such a
mandate, as is the case in the State of Oregon, can sti.7.1 ful.fill the first t�vo ��
functions, but the fact that it is required adds a clistinctzve dimension ta _
the planning process.
F].anning is a process.
Because �onditions change, r�.sources shift, and goals are altered, it is necessary to
re�viss, ac�opt and update a Gity's Gompxehesnive Plan.
The Plan as a Policy Statement
Within each commun.ity there is a wide range of views and ideas. 'Lt is 'the intent of
the Comprehensa.ve Plan to coordinare these various views and the interests of the
City into City wide policy. The policies of the plan say, in effect, "When the
City encounters a certain situation the City will probably act this way for tl�ese
reasons." Thi.s approach has the advantage of stating a position in advance of
heat�ed controversy. To deviate from a policy in a Comprehensive P1an w�ii require
PAGE 1
and argument and rationale as good as one in the plan. Ho�aever, departing from the
prec.epts of the plan should always be possible although nut necessarily easy.
The advantages of re,viewing the plan as an instrument of policy include the following:
1. The essential and unclufitered statements of policy facilitate public
participatian in and understanding di the planning process,
2. A plan that is a statement of policy encourages or even demands
involvement on the part of public officials,
3. The plan as policy provi�es stab�lity and consistency in that it is less
likely to be made obsolete by changing cond�tions, and
4. Finally, the plan is guide to the legislative bodies responsible for
ado tin land use controls the commissions or boards that administer
P g �
them, and the courts which must judge their fairness and reasonableness.
The plan as a guide to decisian making
Those who make decisic�ns about the City need to take into account of what the plan
says. The most eommon way in which the plan is used as a guide to decision making
is in the zoning process. TJhether thesP decisionsl�e made ozi a day-to-day basis
or monthl� basis before hearings authorities �hese decisions would be based on and
refere2ice thase pertinent policies of the Camprehensive Pl.an.
How the Planning Departm�nt uses a Comprehensive Plan:
The good planning agency does not keep its plans on dusty shelves but uses plans
in day-to-day decision making. Thzs example shows how plann.ing agencies use plans.
Let us say tlxat a private deeeLoper wants to bui'ld a 150 acre dpvelopment �hat is
predominatly residential (135 acres) and par�ly cummeraial (15 acres) . Let us
assume that a mixture of housing types - single family h�mes, rental apartmeilts,
aiid condominium a artmen#s - is ro osed. How does the lanni.n a �nc �se latis
P P P
P g g Y F
in re•�iew?ng such a d��veiogmernt?
The agency would first chscic tlxe land use plan ta dete�cuiin� whether the general.
area is desi na.ted residential then examine the ro a e ' c
� , s d densitLe., to see how we11
P P
the f it with �he 1an's z•o osals an,d ro'ections. The lannin staff wotald also
Y P P P
� a � g
check to determine any physiographic characteristics -- soil ccanditions, stream
profiles, and im}�artant stands of trees - to see the environmental constraints that
will influence site plann.ing. The �taff wil.l also determine that land use glan
policies concerning the an►ount and location of commercial space in the center of
the community.
On �he basis of �h� land uses and an��.cipated population to be served, �he staff
will, in turn, cheak other plans for sanitary sewars, starm runnoff, major and minor
streets, and public facilities to determine how we11 the proposed development "fits
into" the community's plans. For exampl�, the parks and recreation plan m�.y caZl for
a neigfiborhood park wiCe wi.thin this ger�eral area. Or the school plan ma� ha�ye
identified tl�e a.xea as being served by an existing school; therefore, no additiana�.
school facilities are an�icipated. The staff will also examine the capital improve-
ments prograan to determine how publ�.c faci7ities that are or are not prograznmed in
the �uture c�i1Z serve the new d.evelopment.
PAGE Z
�I
There wi11 be times when the development raises major policy issues �iot covered by
general plans. Perhanps the plari is out-of-date, or perhaps it was not detailed
�nough to make a judgment. In these cases planning staffs will carry out supplemental
stu�ies that amplify or update a plan element.
Finally, tlze plannzng staff wi11 prepare a staff report that will be presented to
various decision makers in goverament, such as the planning commission, the mayor,
the city manager, and the city council.
The Plan as a legal document
Ir.t Qregon each ci�y must ha�� a Comprehten,si�e P1an. It is state law. And, in many
other states the caurts ar� insisting that some form of plan.ning slocument be presented
as the basis for 1an3use co�atro�s.
Two major changes have occurred in land use control practices which have eroded the
willing�ess af tlae courts to accept a zoning ordinance wi.thout reference of a complete
Compreh.ert��.ve Plan. The first change has h,een because of the increasing use �f
flexible land use controls, ie planned developments, special use permits etc,, whe're
many land uses and develogment stanr�ards are negotiated at the public hearing level.
The second change in l.and use control practic� has been the inereasing adoption. �
of gr�wth management programs, Besides the traditional planning and land use
cont�oY systems �hich have been concerned with ].oeation and chara�ter of growth,
eities have also �een dealing with a third planning dim,e�.sion: The timing of growth.
However, if such ci.ties are to control or limit growth within their limits, the
cour*� have stated that a municipality cannnt be arbitra�y and capricious in its
enforcement procedures.
'i'tie impli.Lations a� the mandated plan and the rulings t:hat �h� cc�ntrol of land
use be conszsterLt with the plan are far-reachin�. The plan ceases to b� an exercise
in platitucles. It rnust be carefully and accurately crafted, for it wil�. have the
farce of law. �.'his is. not to suggest that the traditional funct�.ons of a p1an,
thosa of ed.ucation, informaGion, persuasion, and coo:.dinatic�n, are lost. 0�. the
contrary, these functions wil.l always be a cent�al purgose nf the plaxi� Howe�rer,
as the status o� the plan changes increasi.ngly toward that o£ t�e iraperznanent
constitutzon, it wi11 become m.oxe, importazit, it wi11 be takan �more seriously, and
it will have a greater effect nn peaple's 7,ives.
PROCESS
The process for developing �nd requiring acknovrled�ement for a ��mprehensive Plan
is time consumixig and eomplex.
In the early 1970's the Oregon State Legi.slat�re approved the Department of Land
Conservation and D�veloFment (DCLD) and its commission (LCDC). Duxing the next
few years LCDC developed nineteen Statewide. Planning goals which all rnunicipalities
through the state are requi�ed to address. Out �f those nineteen goals Tigard is
required Co adequately address 1 - 14• See attachad sheet. The speci:tir of each
of these gnals and their requi�ements have been documented by L'CDC.
PAGE 3
Tlie specific process that the City of Tigard has used to address these goals are as
follows:
1. In the late 1970's the Tigard planning staff acquired various data related to
each goal and publish most of. this data in the following docu�ents. "The
Tigard Housing Plan", "L978 Housing Survey'', "The Tigard Economy",
Environmetal Design and Open Space Plan" and "The Gom*nunity Services 3nd
Transportation PZan."
2. Duri.ng the 197D's the City was divided up into seven neighborhood areas and
a separate Comprehensi�e Pl.an text 'an� map was d•rafted and adopted for each
� of these neighborhoods, thus repealing the original 1971 Tigard Community
Plan.
3. All of these documents and maps were packa.ge� and shipped to I.CDC in 1979,
at which �ime the City requestea an acknowledgement r�view.
4. �he review by LCUC was never completed because of the City's inadequate
submittal and incansistent polci.es am�ng the seven plans.
5. In 1981 the Council stated that it was necessary to camplete one C�mpr�hensive
Plan for the City of Tigard in orcier to adequately meet the statewide
planning goa].s.
6. In �arly 1982 initiated the Comprehensive P'].an process which included:
a. Th� review of a11 existing dacuments and data,
b. Tlie review of al.l seven �eighborh.aod pl.an texts and maps.
c. Revi�w of .other cities �caork on their �onbprehensiva Plans.
d. The drafting of new Comprelnesnive Plan Report documents and maps with
updated dataa
7. The intent of this 7.atest work on the Com.prehensive Plan is to draft and
adopt one Comprehensive Plan which addresses city wide issues and policies
and meets the specific concerns of each Neigh�borhood Plann�.�.g Organization.
8. During this process each policy for each neighborh.00d plarc text has besn
reviewed in oxder to determine whether these policies are cit:y�wide in
nature, deal unly with a specific neighborhood ar are unusable because e�f
their. iz�cansistency with existing City policy.
9. Tho�e policies that are salvagable are being incorporated into tha proposed
draf� Comprehensive Plan documents and a11 of the policies wi11 be formulated
into one "policy and summary document" for ease of reference ta those
needed policies.
10. Where there are more specific issues stemrning from thP existing neigh�iarhood
plans, the language o� those issues wi11 be p�.aced in the agpropriate ',
Comprehesnive F1an Repnrt d�cument as guidelines tor development in that ,
particuliar area, it needed. However, it is staff contention that mos� af
these specific issues can be addressed witha.�, the main text o� each repnrt.
Page 4
I _ _ . _. . _
1'1. Tn the process of adopting, one Comprehensive l'lan t�xt an� map, aT1 of ��e
existing seven neighborhood plan and maps must be xepealed and will no longar
be used as policy.
12. In addition, in order to adequately implement one Comprehensive Plarn fihe
existing zoning a subdivision ordinances and maps will be revised into. the
Tigard Land Development Code and Deve.lopment District map.
A7.1 of this Comprehensive Plan proce�s and time schedu'1e is graphically
shown on the attached time line.
13. The actual review process of the Com�pre'ri���.s,�ve Plan includes the submittal of
a11 report documents and maps tn eacia Neighborhood Planning Organization, for
thair review, comment and recom.mendati�n; the submittal: of a11 report �' ,..uYnents II
and maps to the Planning Commission for their review, comrnents and xecommendatians,
and the submittal of each aspect of the Comprehensive Plan t� the City Gouxtcil
£or their review, comments and adaption.
I'
PAGE 5
�� _ _ .
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE No. 82-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPT]�R L6.24 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY-EXTENDING
THE DATE FOR COMPLIAI3CE WITH SIGN REGUZATrONS, AND DECLARING AN �MERGENCY.
TIiE GITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section la The Tigard. City Council deems 'it necessary to extend the- pertod of
comp�iance of noncon,forming signs from the standards set by Ordinance- No.
I 82-34 tn August 30, 1982. Therefore, the Tigard City Council does hereby
amend Section 16.24.010 of' the Tigard Municipal Code a follows.
"Fscept as provid�ed by Section� 16.24.0�0 through 1b.24.040, signs
in exiatence on .Ianuary 11, 1971, which do not conform Co the
pra�visior�s af thi"s title, but which were constructed, erected or
maintained in compliance wi[h aIl ;previous: regulations, shall be
' regarded gs nonconforoiing signs and �hali be removed by Deeember'
31, 1982,..
Sec�iv�n 2: Ina4much as this ordinance is ne�cessary to pr.otect the general
welfare nf the peopl� of the City of Tigard, this amendment must be made with
the 3east possible delay; therefo�re, an emergency �.s hereby declared ta exist,
and this ordi.nance �ha11 bec�me effective immediately upon passage and
approval by tlhe City Council. '
PASSED: By �he City Counc�.l by • vote of a].1 Counc3l
me�bers present, after being read two times by number and title
onl.}�, �th3� day of _ , 19$2.
City Recorder - City af Tigsrd
. SIGNED: Bq the t�iayor, this � day af _— , 19'82.
��
i
Maynr = City of Tigax'd
ORDZNANCE No. 82-
MEMORANDUM
T0: PLANNTNG COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING STAFF �.��,
Att�.ched is �n ordina�ce limiting consideration af applications for i
Comprr�hensive Plan Revisioris to two times a year. Staff feels it would
be difficult whi].e the Compr.ehensive Pl:an is being revised, to process
applicaLions on a monthly basisa
RECOMNIEI�DED ACTIUN:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the ordinance
amendment attached and forward the recommendation for approval on to
Cifiy Councile
��
I
i _ _ ._ _
_ . , _.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 82- '
AN' ORDINANCE ANlENDING SECTTON 18.84 .030, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDUR�S,
OF THE' TIGARD P!IUNSCIPAL -CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
, 'rHE CITY OF TIGARD 'QRDATNS AS FOLL06'JS:
Section l. Section-18.84.03'0 (e) is hereby added to and made a part
of the Tigard Municipal Code, to read;
18 .84:030 (e) - Specific Provisi�ns �elating to Compreh�nsive .
�lan Revisions. A�g�licat ons for quasi judicial Plan revisions
sha e reva.ewed by the Dir•ector only during :the months of A�ril
and Octobex, except for those application.s initiated .by the Comznission
or the Council.
Section 2. TnasmuGh as it is neaessary for th�; �eac�,: health and
safety of the public t�iat the foregoing arnendment to the
Tigard r2unicipal Code b�come effective iznmediately, an em�rgeney is
hereby declared t� e�ist, and this Ordinarice sh�ll be �ffeetive upon
its passage by the Cauncil and app�°oval by th� Mayor. I,,
PAS5ED: By vots at �11 Cauncil members present
this ay o , 1382, after k,eing read
two times by n�aznber and title only.
Rec�rde� -� City of Tigard
APPROVE�; By �he r��yar tni s c3ay o f , 19 8 2.
Mayor - City o Tigard
ORDINANCE NO. 82-
�
I
_
:, _ _
MEMORANI�UM
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING STAFF'����' I
Attached is a list comparing th� curtent zoning des�.gnations with those
proposed on the zoning designation mag presented at *he Au�,ust 3, �9�2
Planning Gommission meetin�. PlPase note that a11 resi.dential �Iesignati�ns
begin with the letter "R" and are f�llowed by a number which corresponds
to the number of ixnits a].lowed per acre. Also note tYiat dll ind�strial
zone designations begin with the letter ''I" and the letter followin� '
de5ignates the type of i.nten.sity: of industrial development permitted.
�
� _
t C:ommerLaa� Fnouscri�1
y Single-family Multiple-Lamily
��e t-hree R-30 R-2Q R-10 i R-7 R-5 A-12 � A-20 A-40 A-70/80 C-4 C-3� C-3M G-5 C-P M-4 M-3 i-1-2
�_.t i
�, Participant sports amd �
recreatian �
� Indoor P P
2. Outdoor
�ersonal services eaeral p p P p p �
�. ?rafessional and
admi:�is rativ erv'c
�c Revair sezvices .�
v. Research ser�ices
z. Retail sales eneral
aa. Scr2 operations
�b. Spectator sgorts ar.d � � '
entertainment -
1. Limitad �
2. Other C � C C C P
:.c. Swa meeta P P P
:c?, Transient habitation
�e. Wholasale, storage and I
distribution . { ' p p p
i
i. ��ini-warehousin p p P
- p
2 L� ht
3. Heavy
�\Dt3STRIAL USE TYPES �
a. Light industrial P P P
i . Foad roducts P P P
2. Finished roducts p P P
3. Electronic e ui ments P
�. Hea industrial � �
AGRIC`JLTURAL USE TYPES �
I
P
�
a, �n�mal waste rocessin P P P
b Aauaculture -
c. Horticulture . P P P 1
i
;�. Packing an� processing � p
� Limi ted P
2. General � •
I . - - �
�
SingZe-famiiy Multipie-�ami�'y cvmw�r�:,o. _. ___ . _
�`E t�:0 M-�
R-30 R-20 R-20 R-7 R-S A-3.2 A-20 A-40 A-70/80 C-4 G-3 C-3M C-5 C-P M-4 M-3
...; P P P P
stora e P P P
i
3. Repairs,heavy
4. Repairs, iight � C � P P P P
P p P P
5. Sales/rsnt�:l; farm
* p P P P
6. Sales/rental, heavy
7 . Sales/rentaly ligi:t , • � � P �p p P
. g P p
8. Sto�age, nonoperating � �
9. Storage, =ecreational � P �
P P P P �
_. Buildizg maintenance
services
Business equipmer.t sales ' P P P
p` '
ti.
Business su ort services' P P P p P
� Gomrnunication services _
Construction sales and P P P P
� ervice
:;, Convenient sales and , P P p P P p P
a ervices
�. c,ating and drinking � � P P P P
�� � `
Ex losive st�r� e . P
_.. Financial, insur�nce and . p P P P P
-Pai ate services
c. Fooc and beveraga retail
P
P
P P P
C � S
Fuel sales C C C P P F P
c�, runeral and interment
services
P P P
2 nterrin C C C C u C C ,C
3 ilndertakin � p P p
4. Gemeteries C C G C C C C C
He1i orts C C C C C C C
s. Laundr � services � P P P P � I
�. Medical and dental P P P P P �
ervices
� . I . ; � � _
I
l.b u^v.tit�.c^ -..� . --
Sin le-tasnil teul��pje-�mM;.��
- Y = Permitted Uses ! g Y .
C = Conditional Uses �R_3a R-20 � R-10 R�7 2�_S A-12 A-2� A-4O � A-70/8(� C-4 C-3 C-3M C-5 C-P M-4 M-3 M-2
:�SI�Et1TI�.L USE TYPES
- . S�.n le detached P P p � g �
C C i,
. �u�lex P
,,, .Single attached zero lot C � C C C
line
_ p P P P
Attached
, uulti le dwellin P
=. Grouo xesiden*_ial p
. Grouo residential(Care) G C C �� � P P
a. ,-tanufactured mobi e ome ,
�
UZVIC U�SE TYPES
- . Adninistrative services C C C C C C C C � F p P P � P
�. Com-aunit recreatian � � `' ,P p p p p
�. Cultural Exhibits and � � C � C � C v
librar - services
. Essential services p P g P P � P P
�. Hos itals C p p p p
�. Lodge, frarernal and C C C
civic assembl r C C
g, iiajor impact services and C C C C C C C
�t�2i.ties
a. Minor imDac� L�ilities C C C C C C G C C G C G G C - C C P
i. Parkin ser�ices ' C C C C 'P P 4' P P P P
p � g p P P P P P
;, �ostal serviees ,
�
Public saf��v services C G C C C C
C C C I
I t�eli ious assembl C C C C � C C C ,
�r�. Schools C G C C C ' 4 C C i
II
CO`L*SERZCAL USE TYPES •
P
P Y P
a. A�ricultur•al sales _
�
b. � ricultural services
c. Amusement enter rises P P p �
d, �*�imal sales and sezvice ,
P P P
1. AuctioZin .
2. Groomin �
3. Kennels �
:; Veterinarv Lar e animal•
5. Veterin�r small a:nimal P P p P P P pj
e. Automotiva and equipment
l. C1e�ning P P
: .
. i _ � � . �
PR�POSED �QNING DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS
OLD PROPOSED
Resi:dential
R-30 R-1
R-20 R-2
R_10 R-3.5
R-7 R-4.5
R-5 R-7
A-12 R`�2
A-20 R-'L0
A-40 R-40
A-70/80 R-70/80
Commercial
C-4 C-I�
C-3 �'G
Co5 G-H i
i
C-P C-P
Not designated GBD
Industrial
M-4 I-P
.
M_3 I-L
M�4 I-EI
i �