The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 08/04/1981 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AGE N DA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 4, 19$1 - 7: 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tic�ard� OR 1. Open Meetiz�g 2. Ro1'1 Ca1I 3 . .A�pr..oval of Minutes from Pr_evious Meeting 4. Planning Commission Communzcation 5 . Public TJearing: A. Btaff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony .�. �'xoponent' s 2. Opponent's 3 . Cross Examination �+ 5 .1 VariaiYCe V 6-81 Jon Davis NPO #7 � 5.2 Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 12-$1 Alpha Eng. NPO #6 S.3 Conditional Use CU 8-81 Tigard Assembly of Gad NPO #7 � 5 .4 Zone Change ZC 21-81 Marie Louis NPO #3 & Variance V 7-81 Marie Lou:is NPO #3 5 .5 Variance V 8-81 Louis Wh�tlatch NPU #5 6 . Old Business °7. New Business A. Discussion of Findings of Fact B. Discussion of Goal 10 Compliance 8. Other Business 9 . Adjournment I - . ,. '� �° > _. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNIN(i COMMISSXON August 4, 1g81 — ?c3Q p.ra. Fowler Junior High v I.�cture Room 10865 SW W�lnut Street, Tigard, pR � Px�e�sident Tep�dino c:alled the mesting to order at 7:30. Presenb: Bonn� Chrieten, Hal.mer, Herron� dColleas, Moen, 0�►ens, Spealcer� Tep�dino Sta�f; Howard, Ne��on City Coun.s�l Sullivan The President introduced Idark Cl��feten, a nerrly appoi.zted member of the Commission, and welcomed Y�im to the Planning Commission. The MINUTF�.S oY July 7 �►ere cansidered. Presideat Tepedino reported that under Communications it was atated he had received a lettar. He corrected that to a commuixication, and x�ported he did wal2� the property. Thereupon Speaker MOVEII' approval af the minutes as corrected. The motion, second�d by Helmer, paseed unanimouely. COMMUNICA�TIONS: Neither Sta�f nor Commissioners �aad receiv�d any communicat�.oas for coaeideration at this time. The Pres�.dant read the usual �tatement of authori�y far and pracedure to b� follox�d in the meet�.ng. He raoted �hat Agenda Iteme 5•2 �� 5•5 had bea� �ithdra�t►n atad would nat be heard toni�la�. 5.l Variance V 6-81 - Jon Davie NPO #7 ' ' A requeet t,y Jnn Davis for a variEenae ta 1oca1 etr�et standard�s. for an extension og �SW 113�h Place to seree AaNn's In,let Subdfvision. (Wash. Co. Tax M�p 1S1 34bC Tax Lot 3�00.) �io*ard read the STAFF R�P�ORT anc� RECOI�IIdFQdDATION. There wae ao AFPLICANT'3 PRESEt�iTATTON nor any FUBLIC TESTTMONY. , , CQMMISSTON DTSCUSSTON AND ACTIONo Commiseioners asked Staff the I circumstanc�s: pravious develop�eaate preclud�d accese to this tract except thraugh a 40 foot �r�de strip 50 feeit long into this property. Tt �ri11 have 34 �eet ot pavinge and a sidewalk on one eide, xith no probleas for emergency services, according xo Staff. Moen MOVED approval of Variance V 6�81, based on, SLaff Flndinge and Recomtaendation. The motion tras eeconded lby Hel.mpr and carried un�niffiously. City Counsel Sullivan arrived at thie pr�int. i � i ..rb . � Y � . � �IINIIT�S T:�GrAY2D pLA,NNIIdG GOMMISSIOId Augu�et 4. 7.981 P�ge 2. 5•3 Conditic�nal Use CU �-81 - Ti.eard A;eeamblv of (3ad NPO #7 A request by Th� Tigard Assembly o� Qod Claixrch to place modu�.ar classrovms on the ehurch property at 11265 SW Ciaarde Street. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1. 3UC. Taac Lot,� 823� �.000, i5oo, i6op, 1700.) Hoxard read �he.S'T/►FF RE�ORT and RECOMMENDATIONS. The ,APPLICANT�S PRF.SENTATION was made by Dave Leary, 5170 Sw 163r.d Court, A7Loha. He explA.ined this is an early step in what 1+� hoped to 'be a much larg�r educational. complex on this proper�y. He stated the requirement fo.s the .half �txeet impro�vement alox�g al,l the property of the ahurch would make �he �ro�ect beyond the means of the churah to undertake at thi.s time. He felt half street improvements are baeically unsafe rrith rer�e:tto ct�i.ldren. Rev. Arnold Hultgz�en, 115�5 �W k'ai.rvie�r Lane, paste�r of the c.hurcb�, expre�sed appreciation for the help of the C3ty �hich he►s been r�ndered so far. He, expla�.ned �he funding of this pro�ec�C by ths c3�urch, ata�ing it is an e�•rly �tep 1� a aon+�ideraply l�r�er camplex. Ha asked considerat�.on of deferri�g tbe half s�reet improveceent requ�.re�- ment unt�.l they come� �.n for �permissian to bu�.�d the �;arger etra�c�urs at eame time in the futuree Ther� was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY. CROSS-EXAMINATZON AND REBUTTAY,: Tn �esponse to ques�ions by Fielmer and Tepedino, Leary etated the ha1f-��Craeti �,mpravpme�t as�.ed �'ox wauld be for appraximately 4 to 5 hundrbd feet. Tbe p.roposed structure ie to be loca.ted be�hind th� ctaurch bu3.lding, and is �o be of mo�ular coaas�ructiC�. �ie distingui�ehad thie fx�m manufactured houein� (mnbile homee) it► that it mee�s e�11 Uniform Building Gode requi�emen�te, although it ie factory built and can be dis�eeembled, m,oved and reaesembled rather eaei.].y. He re.ported his firm has 200 of them used aa sGhool- rooms in Oregon. The`y t�i�.� not be a�tach�d �o t'�e �fiQeeni e�ructure. Tho� dould be removed vrhen the next phase of th� constructiqn takes p�.i�t�b� �st�.mated to be betr�een two and f�ve y�ax�s. Howard explai.ned tkie City�s policy r�quiring half street 3mprove- mente for all deve�opment; that 1n this caee it ie oa a collector ' s�reet, for which aome city funds coulsi be usad; that tha Council has not waivad the requirevaent except via nonremonetrance agreements� rrhich might be a pos,eibi.lity here. Tbere vrae dls�cuesion of color saheme ravierr (appz�ava3) by the Planning Dirqctor, and the poseibility of deferring the 2�a].f str�et improvement until their permanent st�ucture i,� erected. Howard auggested methods o� easing the burden oa the church wou7.d be by way of a nonsemonetrance agreementy or by requiring the half street improvemen� only in f�ont of the 1ot nox being used by the church, and s�uggested he be allowed to take it to �he� Council and � �* .Y ... . . . . .. .. . . . M�NU TF�S TIGAI2D PLANNING COMMISSION Augus� 4: 1981 ' Pa�e 3. negatiate for a mitigation of th� full impact of thie rec�u3.rement. HeLner urged tha� at �.estat some part of the u8ua1 requiremen,t be man- dated at thi� t;ime. Moen MOVED approval of Condltional Use CU 8-81� based on Staff Find�.ngs and Recommendations, Rith tha direction that the Plann3ng Director negotiate with the City Council for mitigation at this time oY' part of the impact of �he half street improvement on the churcYa. Owens Beconded the motion. which carried unanimously. 5•4 Zone Chang�e 7eC Z1-81 N� #3 Vari.ance V 7-81 - Marie Louis A request by Mari� Louis fvr. a zone change from the present C-3 General. Commercia7. deaignation to the Comprehensive Flan desi�ation C-5 Highx�yr Commercial, a.nd a requ�st by Marie Louie fc�s a vax�iance to the side yard setback require- ment fra� ten (].Qa) feet to three (3') feet in �. Commercial �one. Proparty is lacated at 1292� SY� Pac3.fic �iighuray. (1Nasn. Co. Tax Map 257: 2BB, Tax Lot 26�0.) Howarci remd t�e STAFF REPURT and RECOMMENDl�TION w3,th reapect to t�xe Zona Change. The applicant had no comments on thie pnrti,an of the he�xin�, nor was there any PUBLIC TESTIMONY. COMMISSION DISCUSSTON AND ACTION: There appeared �o b� n� probleme xith this request. Speaker ther�upon MOV�D aspg�roval c�f Zone Cha�nge ZC 21•81, based nn the Staff Findings and Recommenda�tio�a. The motion wae seco�ded b,� Helmer and cas�ried unanimously. Haward then read the STAk"F REPORT and RECOMb1�1DATI0NS with respect to the Variance request. The APPI�IrANT'S PRESk7�iT,�.TION was made by Rod W3.ekmal�' engfneer � with Thomas Consulting Eagineere� 1015? �W Harbur Boulevard, Fortland. �. He presented pictures of �he site a� pre�ent. �ie �tated 2t w�e desired. to demolish the present frat�e �txucture azed to construct a new building similar to the aommercial building on the si.te. He explai.ned the planning for th�.e reqnes� and the eonstruction of ne3,ghboring sCructureo had been done on tbe b�aie Qf C-3 zoning, �hiah prevailed until a feq minutes ago. Under C-3 zon�,ng there �rnuld bave been no side yara setbacl� whatever required. Wicicman described exi�ting and nearby e�Cructuree, some of rrhictz are on or t�ithin three feat of the property linea. He sbated the xequirement of a 10 foot stri:p would be a ha�dship because it Xould i 7�' f' . . . . . . . :..Y:.. . .. . .. �.�. ��, MINUTES TI(�Al2D PLAPINING COMMISSION A;ugust �}, 1g81 Page 4. b� unusable ruxd �rnu7.d remov� aaed�d p�trlxing. He axp�a3.raeel the eCOnomic des�l.rability of having a bui.ld9.ng 50 Yeet wide for use ss a business rent�l.. Iie told of contaate made wi.th the property oxaisr+a on' �ch� r�orth, a�nd read a le�ter Yrom ozae �tating no ob�ection to the granting af the variancs. F�s explainedl the necessity to ma�n�a�in �a►ecese to the back oY the lot �ox° park�ng. There waa no PIIBLIC TFST.�,___ IMONX. COMMISSTON DISCUSSION AND 11CTION: Hd�► i,nquired ti�e di�fexence between G-3 ana c-�. Ho�ard sta�ed it rra� principally in the setback r�quiremente, but that the Comgrehene�,ve Pl.an �ad �txie as C-5 an.d accordiagly it anuet be deeelo�ed on that ba,eis. �ielmer ascertai.ne�d there was adequate l,andsca�ing ansl that the �ropoeed building would be ' one story, u2though on txo l,evels. In; response to a ques�ion'by Owene, Howard explai�aed the appZic•a�nt d�d not qua].1Py unc�er the provigione � e�f the v�°iance ordinance: ..that probJ.eme wi�h �he oconomics of epa�e configuratic�n, i.ntexeat ra�es, etc. , are not hard�hi.p� as�definedl in tise ordinaxacee Speaker inquired if the building vrere moved south. would the op�n �p�ce thus created be a1loMed to contain the p�acking acness alang th� pr�gert�► line. Aoward stated it taigh� be a deeign featus°g �rorth consider3ng, although thare ro�1.d be somQ �rading difficnYties whie:h woul.d require cnoperation �wi�th the neighbore► Kolleas 3nqu�red the tlming of changes in requiremente, re$�aded �a by Howard. She fel� th�.s d�.d impose a hardship' conaidering the o�b.er buildi.ngs �n the area. f�oen inquired the confi.�u.ratian of the beai�dir�gs whiGh �;s in four sectione. The on2y propoeed tenant is a � gla�s shop at pre�aent. Iierran inquir�d rrhether delivery truclua would ' �o �o the back of �he 'buil,ding. (They do.) � Spe�ker felt there are extenuating clrcuaKs�'�nces not aecessarily related to the fo�r vari�nce criteria, �nd MOV �" for approval aY t�� ; variance base� on �he ��anomic }aardship aiad t�i� ti.ml.ng ot the� zaning ' c:nanges. 1Kollea� secor►d�ad.. Ih a3.�c��.on, Tepadin,o felt the hard- j e�ips inaurrod a�e by the plannedl use of th� progerty rather than outeide forces vrhich are addxessed by the variance ordin�nce. He � a,sl�ed Counsel Sullivan for comment. Sullivan stated the ordinance is ; sps��.��c, c1�ar, and slmilar t.o t:1�oe�e �'ound in other citiee. He ��C�t�1��1 propan],y to grant thie c�r e�ny o�her variance, the findings �t�ouid be cleax� r►�th regard to ea�h of the four conditione for a variance• After a little �urther disc.uee3.on� the motion �ai�ea 5 - 3� w3.th Spea�ker, Ko].leaa and Herron� voting Aye arid Ghristen abstaining. Bonn thereups�n MOVkD denial of Vari.ance V 7-8].� based on Staff x� Findings axad Hpcotnmend ions. The mation was seconded by Helmer aad � passed 7 - 2, with Kolleas and Herron voti�ng Nay. x"' i f i � ;' i }[ 1 � i . . . . . ..� . ... .. ��-.. .. . . .. . . . .. . . .�_ MINtTTFS TI(3ARD PLANNINa �OMMISSION August 4, �981 Page 5. o�� BusxxESS: *** (iolP Creek Estates: Howard expla�.ned the previ,ous authoriza- tion for this d�vnlopanent expir�s in Septenber. Sittce aeaer is not yet availabla und probablq rrl.11 not be for eome mont4s, he suggested '! the $ranting of an exteneioa with the p�.vision that pr�.or to co�astruc- tion the epplicant submit h1s plan for a cursory xeview. Aiter so�e digcussion. Herron MOVED a twelve-mon�hs extaneion �rom this date be granted to the (�o],f Creek Eetates Developmen�. Moen seconded the moti�in, which aarr3.ed unanlmqusly. *�N It xas explained to a mea►ber of the au8�:once �►ho was expecting a presentation by tho �lnfiied Sewara�e Agency tha�t requ�xed eng3.neering dra�ri.nge are not yet avr11ab1e, aad t4at the hear3ng'�xJ.11 be held on September 8. He w311 rece�ve notice again o� it. **+► Couneel Sullivazy dKe].t at leagth an f'i.nding� o►ith respect to a�spliaat�ons. He .respoaded to a number of ques��ons on epecific Pl�nning Commission procedures� aaid then discussed at length ttce rec�u�.r��mc�n�e of Goal LO of LCDC, A meet�.ng xith Su�li.wan and bath the Fl,�n�a�.rag Commission and the City Counc3.1 rrill be he],d Augus$ �7 on Tigard�e (�oal 10 problems. ,4 Th� Presid�rat a�d�ourned lthe meeting at 10e10. i _ . _. , .. . _ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PUBLIC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNl'NG COMMISSION A�gust 4 , Z981 - 7: 30 p.m. Fow'ler Junior High School - �.,ecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard PUBLIC HEARINGS 5 .1 Va•riance V 6-81 Jon Davis NPO #�7 A: request by Jon Davis for a variance to local street standards for an .extension of SW 113th Place to serve Dawn's Inle-t Subdivision. (Washington County Tax Map 1S1 34DC Tax Lot 3500. ) � i 5 . 2 Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 12-81 ' Condit�.onal Use CU 9-81 Alpha Engineering NPO #6 � 1� request for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from R°10 to R-5 � on 8.2 acres and a Conditional Use to construct si.ngle-fami'ly � detached housing on a portion of the prop�rty. SW 92nd Avenue � south of Durham Rd. (WasYiington County Tax Map 2S1 14A Tax Lot ; 900) . � ! { 5 . 3 Conditional Use CU 8-81 Tigard Assembly of God NPO #7 ;,. . � � re u st b The Ti ard 1�ssembl of God Church to lace modular A q � Y J Y A classrooms on the church property at 11265 SW Gaarde 5treet. {Washi.ngton County Tax Map 2S1 3DC Tax Lots 823, 1O00o 1500, 1600, 1700. ) i � 5 .4 Zone Change ZC 21-81 ` l' Variance V 7°8]. Marze L�uis NPO #3 si �_ ;: A requesi� by Marie Louis for a zone change from the present C-3 f" r- General Commercial designation to the Comprehensive Plan designation 4' C-5 Highway Commercial, and a requ�st by Maxie Louis for a E• variance to the side yard setback requirement fr.om ten (10' ) feet s; to three (3 ' ) feet in a Commercial Zone. Praperty is located �.t �, 12925 SW Pacific Highway. (Washington County Tax Map 251 2BB (;' Tax Lot 2600. ) �;� k. 5 .5 Variance V 8-81 Louis Whitla�tch NPO #5 '' �;; A request by Louis Whitlatch for a variance to the front yard �;', and side yard setbacks in an M-3 Light Industrial 7one. Property j; is located on the southwest corner of 72nd and Bonita. (Washington � County Tax Map 2S1 12A Tax Lot 2000.) � � ;. i i i ; � � n i� r �g:,.. ... � . . . .. .. . ... :_... . .... . . _ _ :.,,... ........ ... .._.. . ...._.. �.._,._._.� MIN�'.�ES TTGAT213 PLANNINa COMNiISSZON � August 4> 19�1 - Page 5. �THER BUS�NFSS: *�* f3olY Cresls Eata�ee. Hoxard explained the pret►lous au�hori�a- tion for this development expires in Sep�entber. 51nce see►er is not yet available and grobabTy x1:11 not be for eome montb�s, he euggested � the granting of an exteneion trit'h Lhe p�rd:v�.,sion that priox to coni�truc- tion the applicant submit ,hi� plan for a� cursory review. Aiter some i diaeussi�on, E�erron MOVED a trrelve-montha extens�:on from this date be grazited to the 4o1f Creek Eststtes Develop�tent. Moen seCOnd�d the motion, whicb carri�ed uaaulmouely. *•• It was explalned to a tnember of the aud3:ence who �rae sxpecting a presemtation by �he:Un�f�ed Se�►era�e Agency tha�t requ�.red engtx►eering <iratrings are not ys� �vai�iabl.e� and that the hear.�ng=xi1Z be he],d on September $. Iie tr�11 .roce�;ve notice again pf it.` - ' +►+�� Counsel Sulliwari dKe1� at length on findings qith respect �o apg�icat�;ans. He:responded to a nwaber ot quest��ons on spe.ci:fic P1�nn�ng Commisei.on procedurae, and then diescue�ed at length �Che requiremante of �al 10 oi I.CDC. A meeting lrith Sulli.van attd both the Plann;ing Gammiss�.o� and the City Council w�..11 be he].d August 17 on Tig�sd�s� (�a2 10 prnblems. Tbe �residant �d3ouxnec� tl�e meeting at 1.O:lA. _.. ..__ , _ , :_. _ . _. .. _ _ __ _ �; _ . . � "PLANNING COMMISSTON SIGN-UP SHEETi� NQTICE: ALL PERSQNS DESIRING �O SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN �IR NAME AND NOTE TF�IR ADARESS ON T�TIS SHEET. + AGENDA I`TEM: 5. / ACTION REFERENCE; p�.f�j �j "�� /f/f �//w AIA^4E ADDR:ESS , ii ._.._._. A(7EI�l�A IT'FM c��J' ACTIQN FZE.E`EREIVC'�;: r � G � / � �'"� ; I�T�1ME AT�D�tESS �i �JJeI� ��O� ,� � � �1.� �-��.-��1 1 �� 3 '� r��V �� t - � � - 5 /�v�S -S� �i�vl.�� . ; }1GENDA TTEM: �j � l.�.CTION REI'�RENCE: Z "� _i�L1'7^�lI�I S N� o�'�� I/ 1-�/ �iG Go�r�S � � '��,�,. �'r��,�. � io�� _�W �-Lb�'�Iv�. ��,. C�, 9?219 � M E M 0 R A N D U M Ta: �ig�rd' Planning Gommiesioners Date: August 10, 1981 From: Clifford Speaker, Planning Commiesioner �e: Cornments nf City Counsel Ed SulliOan on �indin�s, and other sub�ects pertaining to Plat�tting Commi�sio�ers After the Plannin� Commiseion public hearinge on �ugu�t 4► �98�� ' Mr. Sullivan made a preaentation on findingg rhich sbould be rr�ade� and ' on which aetione of the Commiesion should be ba$ed, in �he varioue types of cases coming before the Commiesion. l. Compreheneive Plan Revision: Almos� nothing in �he xay of a standard excopt LCDC Cioals exista, and frequently these are not appli- cab��. The rest a£ the Compreheneive Flan may be �he best basie. Un'lese the c.hange 3s in line �ith the res� of the plan, we ehould probably de�y it. 2. Zon� Chan�e; There isn�t much in �he C��y Cade to go on. The Neighborhood Plan �nd the overall plan is probably the b0�t ba�ie, �.nd these should be the ba�ia of Findinge. 3• Cor�ditional Use Perrait: Tigard does not have �ta�dards for conditional use perm�.ts 3.n 3ts Code. A proper legal etandard is nanexistent. Our beSt bet is to go back to the P1an. � 4� tlariance: This is the most diSficult. �t�ere mu�t be eometb�;ng wrong--not x3th the e¢onomic uee of the proper�y, but with the prop0ar�y �.tself, eomothing mua�t be physica�.ly xrong N►itb tha progerty. Tbat others cwn do what is asked is not relevant. Justification is by Y�ay of Findinge of Fact, rrhich must shoK compliance rritih ttte four criteria , �or a variance ia the Code. Ti,gard�s standards for a v�ria�ce are common to many muniCipalities. Findings axe an assurarice that the 3taff aad Commiesion has �hought through the procese•-thaC �he standards of the Code or the Compr�heraeiwn Plan or the NPO P1an are actually app].iad in the specitic ins��ce. Le�s tha� half of local government deciei.ons etab,d up before I,IIBA, largely because the coanection between writt�n poli�ids and the action taken is not showr�.. Sulli+ran hope+e to go ov�er the Comprehsneire Plan and the p�ocedi�res �q be f�911oM4d as sst ior�h in the Cod�. Whi1e the� poli:Gie� rela�,n in effeat xe h+are Co carry them out. To g�t them cbe►nged ie �► po$eitiillby if re don�t like tbem. Sullivan feele the appellata process should be ueed ratber thaxl authorize the P�anni.ng Director to nsgotia't� xrith Counci].. The P1,anaing Commiebion decision ehauld �ia •��:n.+Kl unle�e it is appealed. � ME�tO - Page 2. Auguet 10� 1981 � A Caunci�. policy to be bindiag on the Com��ssion shouXd be an �, amendment to �he Compreheneive P1an, OthezKri.ee i� ��hae a].]. �he qua].ity of folklore.�� The circumstances o�' �he ap��.icant �or a waiving cf I h�1f street imprcav�ment�� for in�tat�ce� should x�o�G be conei;dered, T�e traff�.c g�nea�seted shauld be considered. (But this dne� not take into coas�deration the construction ot strests in Tigard by thi� meara,s ' as the princi�al meane of obtaining s:treet �.mprove�asn�eo) � � E� pArte cott�acte: �he idea 3s ta be sure that the cour�C knows xha� the Gommiasioner k�ew, Eut t►b,atever eontacts there may be on ttae record �aQ, z�othin� outside the record would taint the decision. Open me�ting laws 11uy gathering of a quarum i,� sub�`ect to tbe s�equireiaent of �otice aiad the taking of �i.nutos. Ex�cut�,ve seseion dose not apply tA the Planning Gommissipn. Confli�ct af intereett If there is a� finanCial.i:nt�rest 3� �he outcame for a Comm3.ee�.o�er or anyono in hie hou�ehold, it maaet be revealed. Su3,li.`van feels if there ia a finanaipl iaterast in the ' outcomo� �he Commias�.oner should diequalify hi�eTf. .Ideolo:gical biasee� � • on tha other h�uad, �e�not:reason for di+�qu�►1i�'i:cation. ' Pereo�al ].3.ab31,i�y at Commie$3.omero: None unlee�e it �s personal and '�outrageous a�� k`or liability �o accrue the Comm�Laa�.an or Comm�.asipne r ` must.}�e aa�in� outside �he acope of authori.ty. '��io n�1r �vidence�� Xhez► a case, is- agpealed to Coy�x�cil t The prizlQi�l,�;li�re is that should new evldence be preeented, the op�cnents da �nati� h�;ve afa ogpurtunity ta rebut it at 'tk�a� b�.me-. If the ev�.dence is iaportant, th� case probably should be set over -�r�ti�. notice can be g�ven for another public hearing. C�-�?�� r . . Clif f S: ake7e _ j �.;,.,. _ . � . -�^t:,�..... .. . . . . . � . . ..- . ... . . . . . .. . .. .. . S'I'AFF REPORT AGENDA No. 5 .1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 4 , 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut 5treet, Tigard NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPI�IC�NT SHALL BE M.ADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNr,ESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, UNRE:QUESTFD, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE F'OLLOWING HEP,RING. DOCKET: Variance V 6-81 NPO #7 Jon Davis, Dawn' s Tnlet Subdivision APPLTCANT: Jon M. Davis 12680 SW Watkins Tigard, Oregan 97223 REQ'UESTc For a variance to the minimum local street standards of 50 feet. LOCATION: Dawn's Inlet Subdivision at S .W. 113th Place, Washingtc�n Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DC, Tax Lot 3500 STAFF COMMENTS: This subdivision �nras approved (Ref. S 6-81) . The Public Works Director was cognizant of the difficulties related to access in that 50 feet is required f or access on a local street, The necessary right-of-way could not be obtained because of previ�us develop- ment to the north and south. The develoger was therefore asked to apply for a variance . PREVIOUS �CT�ON: Ref. S 6-$1 � I . FINDINGS OF F,�,CT: � 1. The Tigard Municipal Code 5ection �8 .76 .020 states that: � � °'No vaxiance shal]. be granted by the Planning Commission � unless it can be shown that a11 of the following conditions exa.st: � (1) Exc� tional or extraordinar conditions applying to i P Y the property that do not apply generally to other � properties in the same zone or vicinity, which condi- � tions are a result of lot size or shape, topog�raphy, 1 or other circumstances over whiGh the applicant has � no control; i ' I (2) The variance is necessary for the preservation of a i property right ot the applicant substantially the j same as .is possessed by owners of other property in the same zone or vicinity; �-. ._. .. .:. ..... . .. - STAFF REPORT 5 .1 August 4, 1981 Page Two (3) The authorization of the variance sha11 not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, or be otherwis� detri- mental to the objectives of any city development plan or policy; (4) The variance requested is the minimum variance from the provisions and standards of this title which will alleviate the hardship. (Ord. 70-32 S240-2, 1970) . " II . CONCLUSIONARY FTNDIPJGS: 1. There are no alternatives a�ailable for access to this property due to previous development. III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of this variance. u � �� die Ho ard i Planning Director AH/smr � 1 i � i ; ! � � � i � k � t L � � � � .. . � . � . � �� .� . . . . . . . , .r., . . . ,. . . .. - . � . . . . .. .. .,. . . �.. �.... . . , . ... .�q � _ _ _ . , ,_ . i f': I' �: � :. ' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 4, 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room ! 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE CU 8-81 NPO #3 Tigard Assembly of God Church (Modular Classroom) APPLICANT: Tigard Assembly of God Church APPLICATION DATE: July 15, 1981 ;' SITE LOCATION: 11265 �W Gaarde Street, Washington Co. Tax Map 2.S1 3DC, Lots 823, 1000, 1500, 1600, 17U0 R-10 zone. REQUEST: For a Conditional Use expansion for modular � classrooms in addition to an existing church. PREVIOUS ACTION: CU 3-73, CU 12-78 and SDR 26-75 ',; ,; I . FINDINGS OF FACT: �;, � � l. Property is zonecl R-IO on the Comprehensive Plan map. A chu,rch e'� is a Conditional Use in an R-10 zone. Code section 18 .20,020: "Any change (expansion) of a Conditional Use must be approved €`�' by the Planning Commission" . ;;� �;_: ;>, II . CONCLUSIONS: � ir r: l. This classroom addition will not increase the need for parking ��i on site. E••� �_ �:� 2 . No significant impact will k�e generated in relation to surrounding ��' 4`�;;'', property. � f`.:I III . STAFF RECOMMENDATTONS: 'il �,,.� �;i Staff recommends approval of this addition to this conditional I"'1 use with the following conditions: !',�;'' t_;� l. Half-street improvemexits to Collector Street Standards �hall be �`;�'� made the full length of property across tax lots 1500, 1600, 1200, 1000 and 813 . If ��ditional R.O.W. is necessary, the ��' aedication sha11 be made prior to issuance of Building Permits. �;': c� 2 . Exterior color scheme for this building shall be reviewed by the i, Planning Dire.ctor prior to issuance of �uilding �ermits. ''"� �';;; �� 3. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued unti� all conditions placed ' ' upon this development by the City of Tigard have been sati_sfied and �� inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate �!;T de p ar tmean t. ;� ',� k� � . _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _. } � � STAFF REPORT � Tigard Assemk�ly of God Chizrch �' CU 8-81 Page Two � � 4. No chang�s will be made to approved plans or specifications unless ? ' formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and $hall include applicable drawings� � 5 . Gradin and construction lans for a11 work in � g p ptzblic rights-of-way � and a1l �other public improvements shall be prepared by a registered � professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall � be submitted to the Public Works Department for review. ` ! All public improvements will require a Compliance Agreement and � must be (design) approved by� the Public Works Department, and must � be either (1) fully and satisfactorily constructed prior to the r recording of any minor land partition, public dedication, final �! plant, or issuance of Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City ! for 100� of the estimated cost thereof prior to the recording of � any minor land partition, public dedication, final plat, or issuance ;', f B ' o uilding Permits �, i 6 . All proposed utilities sha11 be placed underground. Street lighting ; installations shall be approved by the Public Works Departmen.t. ` 's 7. A metes and bounds l�gal description and map shall accompany a dedication of public rights-of-way, parks, open space or floodplain areas and shall be prepared by a registerec3 engineer or land surveyor. 8 . A11 street and parking areas shall be conarete or asphalt. All sidewalks shall be concrete. r � Planning ctor � � � � P ! i � �' t � � f ,:: � , t � �� . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .4 TIGAR� PLANNING COMMISSION August 4, 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. FOWL�R JUNIOR HIGH - LFCTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard I�' NO SUBMISSTON OF ADDITTONAI, MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHA�,L BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEI�RING UN�,ESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED 'r0 DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, UI�REQUESTED, THE TTEM WILL BE TABLED ; UNTIL TH� FOLLOWING HEARING. '� DOCKET: Zone Change ZC 21-81 NPG #3 Pacific Bldg. , Marie Louis APPLICANT: Marie Louis � 11545 Majestic Lane � Tigard, Oregon 97223 � REQUEST: For a zone change from the resent desi - � P g j, nation C-3 General Commercial to the Comprehensive P1an designation C-5 � Hi hwa Commercial (� g y • i� C; SITF LOCATTONe 12925 S.W. Pacific Highway, Washington Co. � Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Lot 2600. �; I. FINDINGS OF k'ACT: � 1.. Property is curxently zoned C-3 General Commercial on the zoning map. The Comprehensive P1an designates this property � C-5 Highway Commercial. �� II. CONCLUSION,ARY FTNDII�IGS t �;� ;.� l. Zo.ne change should be granted to bring property into con- �� formanae with Com�a�ehensive P1an. � III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIUN: 5taff recommends a�proval of this zone �� change . t - t`� �,k Al�lie Howard ;�;'. Planning Director '�� `�: �; i�� i �� ," . . .. 3A..�i ; . . . . �' .. .2: . � .. . : � ...�: V:I � C�f; . . . . . ...'3�; �1 � . . . . .. ..�j l! �. � � � � . . '�'I � �"" . . ... _ ........ � .�. . _. STAFF REPORT AGENDA No. 5 .4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 4, 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. , Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room � 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard ;I 'I NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEAR:CNG UNLESS THE APPLICANT TS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OGCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTTL THE FOLLOWING HEARING. DOCKET: Variance V 7-81 NPO #3 Pacific Building, Marie Louis APPLICANT: Marie Louis 1'1545 Majestic Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: For a variance to the side yard setback requirements in a C-5 zone. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway Washington Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BD Tax Lot 2600 PREVIOUS ACTION: Ref: SDR 20-81 and ZC 21-81 I . FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Tigard Municipal Code Se�tion 18 . 76 .U20 states that: "No variance sha11 be granted by the Planning Commission unless it can be shown that a11 af the follawinc� conclitions exists (1) Exceptional or extraordinary conditions applying .to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, which condi- tions are a result of lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control; (2) The va�iance is necessary �or the preservation of a property right of the applicant substantially the same as is possessed by owners of other property in the same zone or vicinity; (3) The authorization of the variance Gha.11 net ?�e materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, or be otherwise detri.- mental to the objectives of any city development plan or policy; �.. : ..,._ _ ,.... .._ ._.... . .. —.c..-�-...-t•.�� . . . . . . � . . . . .. . ... STAFF REPORT 5 ,4 August 4, 1981 Page TWo (4) The variance requested is the minimum variance from the provisions and standards of thi.s title which will alleviate the hardship. (Ord. 70-32 5240-2, 1970) . " 2. The Tigard Municipal Gode Section 18.36 .030 states that: "Side and rear yard setbacks sha11 be �wenty feet. The setback may be less than twenty feet provided that it is not less th,an ten feet, and that an area equal to the area of encroachment be added to the twenty percent minimum landscaping requirement, and that the side or rear yard is not abutting a residential zone (single family or multif amily) . {Ord. 70-32 5155-3, 1970) . " 3 . Applicant is requesting a seven (7 ' ) foot variance from the Code . � II . CONCLUSIONARY FINDTNGS: l. Applicant does not qualify for variance under the Code. ITIo STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this variance for the following reasons: l . Exceptional or extraordinary conditions do not exist, 2 . No preservation of a property right is at issue� 3. No I�ardship can be shown. � . � e owa Planning Director � i AH/smr a , .,.i. .�,. -..:, . .,.. . .,. . . ... .. ... , . .�.. ._ .�.,..... T .