The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 07/07/1981 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. , _ _ _ _ _ . ..__. . . � i ( �>, AGENDA TIGARD PLA.NNING COMMISSION July 7, 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10�65 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, OR 1. Open Meeting 2 . Rol1 Call 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting 4. Planning Commission Communication 5 . Public Hear.ing: A. Staff Report E. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimon� l. Proponent' s 2. Opponent' s � 3. Cross Examination 5 .1 Conditional Use CU 4-81 KC's Amusements/,Kittleson Brown NPO #2 5.2 Subdivision S 10-81 Winter Lake/Century 27 NPO #7 5 .3 Remand of Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 1-81 Willowbrook NPO #6 5 .4 Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 4-81 Penterra Corporation NPO #7 5 .5 Conditional Use CU 6-81 David Schlaht/Electro Sport NPO #3 5.6 Sensitive Lands Permit USA Sewer Trunk Line NPO #7 5.7 Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 11-81 Ash/Commercial NPO #1 5, 8 Review of Paxk 217 Phase II NPO #4 6 , Old Business 7. NeW Business 8. Other Business y. Adjournment �. I�112�CJ TE,S TTG6BD P'LANNING COMM�aSTON July ?, �.981 - 7:30 p.ffi. Fo��.er Junipr High - Leature Room ].0865 �W Walnut St�^eet, Tigard, OR �:.��vxac�rct Tepedino called the meetiing to order at 7:30. P�as�nt: Helmer, Herron, IColleae, Moen, Owens, Speaker, Tepedina Absent: Bonn Seat Vacant: One Staff: Howard, Newtnn; Legal Counsel Sullivan The president read the uaual statement of authority for and proceduxe ta be �o11oa►ed in the meeting. The MZNUTES nf the June 2 meeting were considered, and on mo�idn of Speaker, seconded by Helm,er, they were approved as submitted. COMMUNIC�iTIONS: Hoarard reported �the term oF' Commissioner Funk ex�ired Ju�y 1, and the City C�uncil has not yet taken actic,n to fill the poa3tion. Howard reparted he will seek earl.y action from �he Cauncil on th� matter. President Tepedino reported raceivin� a letter from a res�.den� at nawn�s Inl.et. He and staff will wa�.k the p�operty soon. 5•� CONDITIONAL USE CU�$l KC�s AMUS�'t�4ENTS„�KI�TI�E50�T BROWN NPO ;�2 A reques� by �Te�f �Ghase and M�.ke Kimrey for a con�ditional use �o approve retai.I sales pf 1�.m1��d t�,me to pZay varioue games �ucli ae electrOnic device�sA pool t�blee ani� fao�bal7.' located in tihe T3,garc� P1aza� Suite 102, $YY Ha11 and Pac�,fic Hig�►�►ay. Wash. County Tax Map isi 35nD r.ot 2ioo. HoWax�d read the STAk'F REIPORT tw.d 1dECOMPRktNDATIONSt APP�ICANT�S PRESENTATION: Mike �.;�ey, 6U1 S� 180th� P+�r�lauid� r�port�rd he w�ts unaware when he etarted hie a�nueement buei.nrss t�at a conditiion�l use permit �as nece,asary. PiJ„BLIG TEST MONY xas presented b�r.:Dr. John (3odfrey, dentist N��'� off3.ces imn►edia�e�.y above the �uruaenqg�►� .businee�s. He reported tb� �uke box, �►hen operating, was vesy noisy, 'bub that an accomntiodatiom ha�e been rrorl�ed ou� and the noise hae Eoaeed. CROSS�F,�lMINATTON AND R 'T�l�U�: Kinsey etated tbe �uke box is no� and w3�ll nat b� u�ed during t'�Y bu�simess hours oi the busine$s n,e�t door, nor in the �vax�ing if the doctor ie rrorkin�. Howard repori;ed the conditions imposed are very aevexe. Speaker inquired whyr the condition;• here is different from that racometended on Ageri�da Item. 5•5 on a somer►ha� eimilar busine,es. Ho�ard r�ported the (Iod� proY�.s�.on �z _ MTNt1TES TI(�A,RD PLANNZNG GOMMTSSION Ju1y ?, 1981 � Page �^ cited on Item 5.5 ha�s the same effeat. COMMISSTONDISCUSSION AND ACTIDN: Herron questioned the need for thie type oP bus�.n�se' in �he area. Kolleas agreed, bt�� acknow].edged �here ie no apparent opposition from the merchants in th� Plaza. Spealser felt if the applicaa�t could satiefy the doc'tor above the business there could not be much serious ob��ction to its continuance, and MOVED approval of Conditional Uee CU 4-81, based on tha �ta�tf ' report and r�commendations. H�lmer seconded the motion, whictx carried , �nanimously. 5.2 SUBD�VI3ION S 10-8� WTNTER LAI�„F�/CENTURY Zl NPO �7 A request by Century 21 for a time extension, new lo�t�.ng and a minor change to Wi.�ater T,ake P1.anned D�.etr�.ct Deve1- ' opanent loca�efl at the east side of 135th asid �he--west s�.de of i�o��. wasa. co. �ax Map 1.sZ 33�, �,ote 300, 500, 6oi, 602 Soward re�d a letter from Joe Wa1.s�i� Plannin& D�.rector of Waker �sociates, Inc., dated Maty 8 ouiclinin�; xeasons for the entension of par�►i.s�ion to pursue development o�a this sub�ivision b�► ttse ne�r oaners. Howard pointed out tha� on the agenda� tk�is e�rening ia a requea� by the UniY�ed Ser�erage ,�ga�acy for permis�ion to install a larger l�ne in�o this area� and that se�rer capaci�y �as limit�;d .develop�aent heretofore. He reported th�y �.re ask3n� Por a ane unit decrease in the ,previquely approved density. Stafi��s recommendation ie �hat appz�oval be gi�ten ° for a mne-year extension d� th� subdivisian� and to ths plat for one , less unit �han previs�usly apgrnved. APPLICANT�S PRE5IINTATIQN: Joe Wal�h of Waker Aesociates axplained that a boundary eurvey changed some of tlae lots. �ie felt this is a better plan, than the previou�s c►ne. There rrae no PIIBLIG TESTIMONY offared. .,.._..._ ._...........__-_ COMMISSxON �D S�C._U.5.;�I...O..N_ AND ACTION: Moen! wbil.e fee].ing the deneity ie on the hig side, .�elt we shou�l�not c�enge it now in rn�.d8treams especially eince they are reducin� �he den��.ty �,f anly $lightl.y. Owens reported consideratione of NPO �`7 �n� stated a.hile they did approve �he aen$�.ty, they may bave ,aome concerna on Phae�e II xhen �.t comes before the Comm�s$�;Qn. HerfiO� MOVED approval of extensio� of Subdi.visi,on S 10-8� fox one year, ar;ti approval of the sevieeQ plat ehow;Lng one fe�ar uni,ts. �he motio�z r►ae secoadecl b�► HeLner ancl una�aimously approvQ�� MINUTES TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSZON Ju1y 7, 1981 Page 3 5•3 R�IAND OF COMPREEiENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 1-81 WILTAWBROOK NPO #6 I � A rem�nd from Ci�y Council to the Planning Comraission for I reconsideration of an �pproval of a Comprehensive Plan , Revlsion frota pa3sent NPO #6 Plan Map zoning (density) , clae,sifi.cation to .Al2 PD,& Jk�A PD Urban Densities ��Multi- family resident3al'� be�ws+an N�eve Boad to the south and ' Evaiigle C�metary, on �he North, 99w �o the r►eat and 109th � Avenue to the east. Wa�h. Co. Tax Ma� 2S1 l0A Lote 4204, 'i 4390, 44oz� 4500, 460.�;� Map 2S1 10D Lots 500 anc� 600 Howard read the STAFF R�ORT and RECOMMII�TDATION. He stated the several concerns of th� Council resulting i.n the remand to the Commis- sion. He emphas�zed tihe return to the Commis�sion of each separate devel.opment as a PD far' the full heaxing process. He stated one parcel. of 10 acres is requesting only A-12 instead of 1#-20 pr�viously. Because of the tapography he figured the eventual density wauld eome out about 8 to 1Q units per acre. '�he APP�IGANT�S PREST�3NTA,�TON was made by John Block, representing the several property oxners, e�nd also the MDS o�rne�ship in a real estate agent capacity. He s�ated �hat aince the previque bearing in March �Che applicants have hirad an architect. By this ��ep they� have progre�sed to a point on].y a little ahoxt of a p�anned dewelopnaen� appZication. Iie revieWed the Graphic Supplement submitted. He. too, stated t'�e evsntual denaity wouZd be batrveen 8 e�nd 10 units per acre, as compared wi�h lt� for SuiamerField to the sou�h. The reaeon for �he considerably h�gher zoning asked for i� that wlaea� the PD formula and the sensitive lands restrictione are �rorked out, the reaul�ing density is �auch 7Les� , than is at�.lowad by the nominal, zoning. He cited ae an exampl,e of �h�.s proc�ss the Iiusvar/Ericksoa�/Peterson parcels. for which &-20 zoning is requeated. On these parcels the actual resuZti�g denaity is only $ un3�s per acre. Had A�12 xoning been requeeted, the yield aould t�ave baen. 5 units per acre, which lrould not be economica].ly feas3ble. � The •MDS owners have reduced their request from A1-20 to A-12r wh3.ch wi11 yl.eld a'bout 9 units per acre� which they fael is tk►e minimum feasib�.e in this �rarket. Their attempt has been to put higher densi��.es oin the loper �lope� near NASVO kt0a,d� an�d loY�er denaiti,�e higher on �he kai11. Mr. �31ock introduced t�►e' i�r�bitect for tha pro�ect, Mel Kroker, �0 NW 23rd Place, Portland. Mr. Kroker refsrred to Eschibit No. 5 shich illus�rates the buffering vrith treQS. fie �tated that tor their own protection, buffering mt PaG�.tic Highway ia very important. Ho called atbention to eaC3�eti,ng tao�.ees ad��aent tt�at are bui�t o�► �lopes steeper than are al].d�ed to t�e built upon notr. � PU_�___�BLI�,C TESTIMONY in fapor: i � MINIITES TIGARD PT,ANNIN� COMMTSSION Ju].y 7, 1g81 Page 4 *** Jorn Peterson, 1�455 SW CrQSmer, owner of approxi.mate l� acre lot facing Pacific Highway. He is asking A-20 in order to get a possible mautimum af 10 units beca�se of e1o�e constrai.�ats. He percaives the biggest iesue is development of SW �.09tti, arhic.h be fee].s should not affect action on, his property, located at eome distance Yrom it. PUBLIC TESTIMONY :Ln oppositio�i ovas presented by -- "�* Marge Davenport, 15100 SW lOqth, who presen�ed a petition with 24Q signatures reques�ing denial of any change iu the comprehensive p��.a�. for thia r�rea. The petition cited the area as an envirozumental resource to Ti,�ard; that increased density and accocnpangi.n� taffic would be "3.ntolerable", and that the "ia�tegrity and liveability of the whole neighborlxood would be affacted�� adversely. Speaking for the eigners of the petition, she �aid they don�t 13.ke �he tdea of apartraents inva@ing in what is eBeen�ially a r�sidential neighboxhood. They Rant to protect the trees� which �he characterized as a protection �o Ti�e�rd. She reported that 1n ane area the people signedi becaase they '�fear ereeping condominiums could de��ray �heir are�.et The Andersons arzd others on 109ttx tare concerned becau�e of the steep street and th� hazards to traff3c i,t presents. The Summer�ield people signed beQausa of their concern about 109�h, because it is the route to the freeway-- it is the easie�t way to Portland. Me. Daveaport revieRed provisians af NPO #6 perta�.ning to the ar�a. She reported conversations Aith the MDS people and Mr. Kroker �o the end that 109th not be developed� bnt that instead there be a road up the cen�tex of the pro��ct. She Btated her belief ��This �rould 4ie accc�p�Cable�� if the Planning Commission rrould agree that 109th arpuld ' not be devel.oped; that in that r,ase MDS has agr�ed to deed restrictions for a buffer zone �3th natural vegetation an51 the erec�ion of a chain link f�nce the ].ength of the property. She ezpreased lack of confidence i.n what ne�r o'�ners might doo sinCe thexe 1s no assuranca t�he gresent appl�.cants wi�.l be the ulti.mate devetopers. She stated I�PO �6 is being revitalized, and asked that it remain as ie until NP� 6 has looked at it. She reported everyone 13ving on 1�9th has eig�ied a pet3.tion opposing opening 109th aa a throu�h street� and she read'� latter �.�a nppasi�ion from I�s. Elizabeth .Anderaon. **�* � Jane Miller, 1Og20 SW Highland Drive, agreed pith Ms. Daven- port� and�..,asked an editarial in a recent Gourier be entered in�o; the record a� lndicative of community sentiment. She detailed a dra�nage problem Srom off the hil�.� sinee corrected. . ***� Al Erickson, 15200 SYt 149th� recounted what condi��ons°�were in lgy.8 and �hat they are ncaw. He stated he uses soads through Summer- fielcl to get to Tigard or Portland. *** Peggy Davenpor�, 15100 SW 109th, compained that the dens3.ty proposed cou�.d mean 2,000 more people, xhich would �reatly afPect the ! r�xrtumEs TIGARD PLANNING COMMTSSZON July 7s 19$1 Pa�e 5 '�liveability ar►d integttity af �he neighborhood.�� She cit�d d�ff�culties with 10y�:h because of its ste�� grade. She asked, "Who can we trus�C?" ci�ing the experi�r�ce o� Canterbury Woods where the developer did Mot �erform as au�harized by+ City Coc�e and directives, **� Dave Atkinson� 101}60 SW Century Oaks Dr3.ve� stated his purpose �ras to pratect his 3.nvestment in his home in Swnmerfield, and to` protect �Ghe pexi�s�gry of Summer�ield. He does not want ��any inva�ion of roads< or i.ncreased �raffic10 3.nto the area at all. Ha threate�ied in�un.ct3ve action if h3s vie�► i.s not aceepted. Iie spoke disparagingly o� I,CAC, anci opined th�r� is "no reason for increased traf�ie to invade ot�r per�ptt.e.ry'" , GROS3-E}CAMINATTON AND REBUTTAL: Mr. Kroker respond�d to a question f'rom Com.miasioner Owens w3th reapect to the half street necessitgted � k,y �he non-incJ:uea.an of �he Anderenn praperty. It hae been repo�ted, without veri�'ic�ti.oiz, th�t �he �ndereon pro�erty. is� �or. �a7,e� whieh woul.�i make possible cert�ai.n changes in. the ultimate? devei.npment. iie pointed out they have no control over the 109th s��uatian Rith respect tn the Ander�sons, and that there is a ].e�al:�r�c�ion by ttsem a��i.nst Ganterbury Woods, the outcome of which is� pre�antiy unknown. Tha property awners al�o are very concerned al�out liveability, �ccox�d3.ng to Mr. Block� who cited tt�e d�tail they;.have gone tp i� prepaxing this ap}?lieatiun. He detaiAed the3.r effor�ts to respond to the �hree issu�s--soils and slopes, aensity� and �raf��.c. He discounted the aasertion tizere would be 2,00(D people, stating �heir expectioi� ie a maac�anum pf ?06 people at fu�.l dev�lopment. �ie .apined the orig3.na7. NPq �6 Plati m3.gk�t r�ot be appropriate Yor c�xx°ren�c conditions in the mair.ketplace and in the economy, but that they be.lieve othem cona�.dera- tions in'the P1an are very va].9.d--saving �reeg, preserving the h�.11side, and open �spa�ce grouping. He poin�ed out thr�t �ak�::ng.the present ctene3.ty of 2 or 3 un3.ts per acre through the PD .�'ormula, the MDS prop�rty -cou].d have only 3 units on 1.0 acree. �ie feals that the den,si-t�r �pecificati.ons �.n the I�PO #�6 Plan are not conduc3.ve to 1e�gical and efFi:�ai:enti u��i�a.o�xiient. , � Marg� Davenport asked iP� i� �he newly propos�d �pina road is developeci, �la.� Craff3c •could 'h� �imited to a ri,ght turn onto Naeve, 1Uak�.I�g �,t g0 t0 Pacific Fi3,ghN&�►• Aob Millex'' attornay r�pre�senting the MDS .in�exeat, ca].led at�ention to Goal 10 q and tha�C devel.apme�►� bf �ka3,s pxoperty 3.n the manner tb.a'� the ovmers wi,sh wi11 go quit.e a t�ay in :meeting Qoal �0. He stated that thi� heari;ng Qoos not concern traffic patterns and raads-- �.� aoncernr� zoning. Traffic coasiderations �till be handled when the plz�nned davelo�.ents are propo�ed. (The President gavel�.eci doam oxpressed qpposit3;on ta t:hi.a statemant from th� audienee.} MTI3t,�TE5 TI(3.�2D PI�ANNINtir COMMT,SSION du].�r 7, 1981 Pagq 6 Speads.ax asked Marge Davenport her defini.tion of liveability, which she �tated �.s haviag a decent neighbor�ood Pree of crime� axces�iv� traffic, noise, pol,luti�n, problems� garbage, stroe� �afety� etc. Miss Davenport asserted that 700 car� coming down Summerfield won�d' ��dest�oy�� the area� and therefore the traffic is a valid con- s3d$r�at3;on a� thi� zoning he�r3.ng. Ho�r�rd poiated out that Tualatin Developrnent Cqmpany ha� proposed a �.50-unit condominium on 109th and Naeve in addition to 36 single fam�,�.y home$, to be bui].t �oon. COMMISSION DISCt1SSI0N AND ACTTON: Herroa� does s�ot like the i.dea ._...�,...�, .r._ of �evelopment in the preaently beautiful are�. Kolleas feels this wil1, be developed in �ime� but each developotent. should come be3'ore the Gonupi$si.o*►. � Moen felt 109th should go through to make a proper traffic pattern, and that the �ox�r densi�y zoning +ahou].d continue� Owene agrbed higher densi,ty is bound to occur� but this is not the ��ace, �ie3.�er favored looking a� e�ch individual prop�rty. Speakex �elt this is an area well qua],i:�ied for higher den�aity becau�e of prox3.m3.ty to mass trausit ar�d a ran�e of consuraer se]rviCet�m and because �auch of the etitrrounding �dev�eloped l�nde have h9.gh dens3ty ' deve�.opmien�. He pointed out that the Pl� requiramexats assur� adequate pub�.i.c 3nput as the pro�rties are developed. For thesa reaeon� S�eal�ex M0�1 approval of Comprahensive Pl€�n Rev�.Bion CPI.2 1-81 as mocl�.fied on�thie r�mand to the P1a�eni,ng Commiseion� and commended it to �he Tigard City Council for adoptioza. Tepedino eeconded. In � dis�useion, the mover ca7.led attent3,on to the 8 �0 10 uni.ts per acre expeated by the applicaz►ts in spite of even A-29 zoning, ae compare�d t�o �.� units per acre 3n 5wnmerf�.eld, ielling this is not out of line. After further discussion among Moen� Owens, Speaker and .Staff, the motion carried 5 to 2, e�3.th Moen a�d Dwens voting nay. :l'he PrQ�ident declared a five-minuta recaes. 5•4 CQMPR�,ENSTVE PLpST RE1PISx�N CPR 10-81 PENTERR� CORP. NPO �7 A req��st by The l�entc�rra Corporation for a Campseheneirre Pl� Revision from 8-7 (eingle family resl.denti�7.) to A-12 fmulti-faaiily res�de�tial.) on 11.54 acres� locat�d on the wes� s�.de of 130t;h Avenu�� aouth of Scholls Ferry Rd. Wash. Co. Tax Map 7.51 j3D� TPx Lo� 200. Howaxd read ��he STAFr' REPORT and RECOT�IM�IDATIONS. Laz�ry Finer male tha APPLTCANTfS PRE3EN'�ATION. He felt �he staf� repqxt cov�red a7.1 important pointe� an,d ex�re�sed agreament twith it. , . . _ 2QZNtJ�FS TTG1�D PLANNING COMMISSION �uxY 7a 1981 Pa�a 7 There was no PUB�xC TESTTMONY other than � letter read by �Ioward from Mr. Ca113.o, who ob�ected to the propo�al. and protested not rec�iv�.ng notiee nf this heaxing. He asserted Scholls Fexry Road could not accept the added traffic, and that there ie no nead ,for high dens�ty housing in thi.s area. CROSS-EXAMINATION AND R�:BUTTAL; Orvens pointed ou� the N�C1 #'J Plan did indeed contemplate higher density in this area, contrary to Mr. Ca111o�s lettsr. C4MMISSION DSSCUSSION .AND ACTIOPI: After queations of ataff by Maen, Com�nisaioner Owene MOVEU approval o� Gomprehens3.ve P1.ari Rev�ei.oa� CkR 1-81, t�ased on staff findinge and recammondationa. Kolleas seconded �he motion, whieh carxi�d unanimausly. 5•5 CONDI�ION USE CU 6-81 DAVID SGHLAIiT/ELEC�'RO»SPORT N�0 �#3 A� req�a�s� by Electro-Sport for a condit3.orral use for a �ami.ly gante center� locat�d in t�►e Cantex^bury SYzopping Center. Wash. Ca. Tax Map 2S1 10A, mazc Lat 1700. Hotrard read. the STAFF REFORT and REGOMMENDATIONS. David Sc.hlaht, ow�er and manager of Electrp-Sport, made the APPI��CI�,N.x°S RRESENTATT02d. He explai.ned in detail the operations of ths �ui�i��ie�ts and $'�e rQStr�ctions aimed to a�sure a c13.entele 3.ncluding a proportion Af adults that ie compati.ble �rith the shopping center. He introduced G�e� Kalher, 114(D SE 7th, Portland, owner of Junis Di�txibuting Gampany�, who described the v�deo type af entertainraen� ent��prisee. He rei�erated the standards that would be enforced. T.he point xas made there would b� no loiter�ng in th� establ�.shment--the typq of �ames do not promat� that. PUBLIC �'ES________TTMONY,. 'c�1.1. in oppoeitior�� Xas given by -� *** Walt Boule� 1y.35� sW Pacif3.c Highway and owner o� the Coast- to Coast stare in Gan.terbu'ry �.qlsasx°e, repc>rted Y3 out of 1y� of the I tenants opposed thls requeet. The reaeon given �►as 1.oitering and vandaliem; that while it is pro�ect�d as a ta�;ily' entortainment een�er, �hey do not b�lieve it w�.].l fulfill tt�at expec�ation, and they have had troubl.e a1��ady v�ith 1.o�.terin� and vanda],ism. *** Banno Britzi 1y.�65 SiY paci�ic Iiighr�ay, operator o�' the Thriftw�,}► store and leasor o�' apprvximately 25 per cen'� o�f tho Bhopping center, told of effarta in �he last year to impro•ve tbe•ime�ge and upgrada the center. He opined the add�.tion of this bu+�inoe� qould n,ot help them 3.n thia e�fox�. +�*w Bob Buckley of Pet �n� Pond Shop in t.he center, opposed the r.equest becausa of vandalism. He cited inetances of how his equipum�ant MTN�JTES T�4ARD PI�ANNING COMMISSION July 7, 1g8T Pag� 8 and shop .have baen damagad, and selated ac��.vities of young people around the aenter. �•* Sandra A].bo, Diamnnd Lof� Je�relry Store� 14357 Paclfic Hlghway, �tafced the3,r cliente�e Rould be deterred by loitering youths. She, tao, gaee instances of vandal.ism. She opined Rhile �he manag�+r might be asble to cc�ntrol loitering in his establishment, he r►ou3.�. be un.ab�.e to control it in �Che large pax�king lot. *+** Bob Beeman xith a sleep shop businees at 14375 �9� 1'acific �ighway, meritioned the access in and aUt of the center. He falt the requeeted bu�iness would increase the traffic problem, and cited ins�ar�ces of vandalism. � GROSS-E3CAMINATTON AND R�i�UTTAL; David Albo of the Diamond Lof� disagreed �ith the appl�car►t that bhe area is we11 lighted. Mr. Sch,la�t det�iled .h3.s plang for exterior li�hting. Albo i.nc�uired the piroposed hours of operationA prevention o! littering, rasponded to by Sc.hlaht. Mr. Britz enlarged on the parking problems. There aras discussion about �hether the o�rners �ra fact l��l ap�roved leasing Far �hia purpcs�e. App�ea��y tha rea]. estate agent appxovQ�., but it sas not �cext�i.n xh�thex tk�e oa►ner was aw�re of the reque�t^ �� COMMISSION UISC�,USSZON A�,TD ACTTON: �iez�ron pas e$,pecial].y cor�c�rned about the tr�`fia �i�uation, and di.d not see a need for tx�o such centers in fiigarde She po3nted out t.here are bu�inesse�a serving beer, and one aerving liquar, in the centsr. Ko1.le�s agreod x�.�h Mro Hritz that t�� parking is inadequate �s is� and mentioned��nother electronic stor� nqatrby. Speaker stated the testi.mony ahanged hi.s vie�t, since the material � in tbe �acket indi.cated that 3,t was indeed a well. �though� out praposal. Tielmer felt it 3a incompatible with the ahopping center. O�rens rrae impxessad wit�h �he thought given to the propoeal� and felt the xSsk should be taken in this in�tance--��the prablema with the �uvenils� already exi,st". 'Moen felt it unfair to approve the previous amusement compariy co�ditional use fai.rly eae3ly as com}?&re�l to this one, which is og�sosed. by �he neighboring merchante. He fp��;;� Comraent �rom the Police Chief is in order �.n th�s case. He felt t�;�i��.ng �ou1d be in qrd�r to g.Lve t3.me to get such a report and to ge� some questiona answered �►1th respeat to �he though�s of the property oxner. A,ccordin;gly� Moan MOVFD to .t�►ble until an og�inion from tlae Po11ce Chief es to the sui.t- abil:—ity of this �,ocation for this operation can be obtai,ned. Owems seconded. The motion fai.led 3 to 4, with Moen� Owens and 5�eaker voting �ye. •• Tepedino syutp��hi,zed with the owner of a prospective bus�.n�ess tryin� to get stax�ted. Moen suggeeted deferr�,n� the decision and maki.ng the lan�uage for continuation af the bueiness the same as for KC�s � i � MTNtI T�S TIGA�RD PI,.4�`iNING CON4IISSIOPI July 7, 1981 Pago 9 Amusemen�s. Iioward repo�ted the C3.ty could xork �vith tho other tenants to try ta rPSOlve �ome of the recogn;ized difficult3.es. Helmer stated it is "a horr3.ble site" �or traff3c at prese�t. He called attentf.on to the si�uation in this center aa compared t►1th the Tigax�ci Plaza. Kolleas thinks there is a be�ter location for the busineas, agreed to by Hosron and Speaker. Helmer MOV�D for denial, based on poor traffic floN and incompat- ibi�ity �3.tYi the other tenants. Kolleas eechnded the motion� rrhich car�ied 5 �� 2� w�.th M�ez� and Or�ens vot�.ng no. 5�6 SII�IST�IV� TJ�PTDS PERg4IT M '.i-$1 - U.S.A. SCHOLIS SEWER TRtJNK LTN� NPO #7 A requsst by The Unified Sewerage Agency for a Sensitive Lands F�ermit to construct the Se"ho11s �ewer trunk line froza S.W. T3:edeman west to S.W. l�?lst Avenue. Waah. Co. Map 2Sl �AA:, Ta3c Lots 1Q0 ax�d 1Q�.; �S1 3AB, Tax Taots l0A ax�d 300; lsl 34 vice Tax I,ots 3601, 3602, 354� �d 1.2Q0; 1S1 3y�GD, 'P€tx Lot$ 100 az�d 120c. Howard rea� his bx�.ef inemo at June 26 recommending a�proval. He stated the alap is onl� general; the final ma� haa not yet �e�n prepared. V�he� it ie, it w3�1 bo anai.lable fnx ravie� at Cityr Ha1.l. Iie ca,ll�d a'tt8�nti.�n to the Sumra�ry Statement for Application of Sensitive Ttands Permit, which he characterized as quite clear. pr�sident Te�ed�lno confirmed that the U.S.A. is th� appllcant. The�e �raua no APPLIC{1NT!S PRESII�tT,ATION. pUB�LIC. �EST�,T�MO�NY in favor �a$ gi.vex� by Dale Ott, �i9oo s� ii6t�, a res3.dent i�ho reco�n3.zecfl the need. His concern was for preeQrvation of the trees� an�l he r$cognized i.t is ear7.y to express this coacprz� im detail. PUBI.TC TESTII�ONY in oppos�.tion aas given by Art Haas� 11�65 SW. Kather3.ne. He expressed c�ncern for the gre�nRay� the detail.g of which �rill not be knorm uritil la�C�r. ` CROSS-�XAMtNA�ION �D REBU�TAI.: Mr, Ott asked the�y b�a notitied• whe�i p7,ans are available y agreeii to by Howara. Maen inquired abou�C the e�'fect of �he reside�tss input 1f this i,s approved ton3�gq�G, Tepedino expressed some other concerns with U.S.A. Spesker �ug�ested it might be ws].l tc� table until camplete �.nformation is aX�tilable and �he reside�ts .can re8pond. 0�►ena related the experience i:r� :ber neigh- borhqnd, which wen� through this same thing a couple caf ye,�f's agp= She eaid w��hin ane year, everything--birds, ve�etation, e�c.--ttae back essen�ial.ly to �Ch� oacigina7. state. ?!r. 0�� suggaet�sd �.n one area MINIITES TIGARD PLAId1�ITNG COMMISSION Ju19 7,, 1981 Page 10 ' th� Iine c�uld go �.a� �he floodplai.n acroc�s the creek e�here n� ma�or vegetation exists. ' COMMISSION DISCU$SION AND ACTION: Afber a little discussion as ...�._�.... .....__.._.�.�.. .,...r. �Co tbe proper method of handling thise �peaker MQYED for cont�.nuatton , . of this issue. Moen $econded the motion, Nhich cax�ried una.nimou�ly. 5•7 COMPRII�,�iSIVE PL,AbT REVISI4N CPR 1.1-81 NPO #1 A request by the City of Tigard foac a Comprehenc�3.ve P1an. Revision to add the exteneion of 11�h Avenue through to Commercial Stree'� to the NPO �l Plan. Hotvard read the STAFF REPC)RT and RECOMt�ENDATIO�d, whick► became the A„�PPLICANT�S PRFSENTATION, since the applicamt is' the C3,ty. PUBLTC �TESTIMONY -- all in opposit3.o�, w�a pr,esented by -- �** Fz'eci A,xidersan, 1av�rryer in Tigard, appearing �'in behalf of the publ3.c in�eree�C�� and �'the Lwo izinoc�nt landowners--Mr, t�nd Mi�s. Davis." He noted the extended a�treet would mnke a noticea�ZQ �o�• He asserted � no benefit to the landowners, and anather railroac�� crossing is not needed. He d.iscusaed the legal �.mpl�.cations to the T�avises. He questioned �he t�.ane within 'which Ash A�raraue would�'be°extiended to Burnham. *** John Butler, secretary of NPO �1, xead' �Yie minute's of the JunQ 30 maeting of NPO.{�I at whf.ch it xas agz�eed no,,action should be talcen by the City in this regard at the �present ti:nie, and wla�►. ' **� Crai.g Eagleson, oxner of the ath�r ].ot involved, sug�ested � neiCher extene3.on of A;sh A.venue (acro�� the creek, aaross the rr�i.lroad traclks), is °foaeible bacause' af cost -- �100,000 to �ross each of tvro railroad tracks� plu� $50Q,000 to cross the creek: There has boen n� showing dY public demand or public rieed fo� thi:s--merely the i.c�eas of t.he Pl�ting sta�f. He falt ge�tin�g publia 8uncls for the •purpos� from the federal goverx�ment ie illusory. He reportad tha� in a telephone conversatioz� w�.th Mr. Ast�.1 of the Public Ut3lity Comm�.ss�.aner�� office, Mr. A�til. sta�ec� they rrould be vexy reluctant to apprave a ral.lroad crassing urtles� it be shoxra to be required by publia conveni- ence r�nd nec'e�sity�-unless there �.s a aemonstration of ma�or civic demt�nd for that croes�.ng. He reported two praepective sales forlhis pro�erty have been thr�arted by mention by someone at City Hall of an easement for Ash AVenue over this property. ',Chisp he said� is not true. *** LeRoy Hw�me�� ublic Pro�ects Eng3.neer �or Southern Paq3.fic Com�iany, rrho eta�ed n�ither he nor hi.s company have been aontacted. He recounted actions taken by the rai��road �o im,prove croas3,n�s in 2'i.�ard. Iie� e�plained the mechanics of a ra3.lroad track, which he characteri.zed as inqompatible �r:i.'th ��reeits. �hi.s craate� prob7.em$, i v�hich the ra3lroads want to m�.nim3ze se fax as possible. �, _ ._ ; r MINUTES TI(�ARD PLANATING COMMIBSION JuIY 7, 1981 Page I� *** Cr'a9.g Reiley of the Publlc Utili�y Commiss�.oner�s office, Sa].em, and � subordinate of David Astil, detailed st�tutary guidance �rith rasp�c� to pub].ic crossing�. He stated th'ere is no money--federal ' or state--that he l�aows o3' avai�.abla foar ne�v crossings. �e opined the t�►o :Yull�r sxgna7.:i.zed cro$sings adgquately serve Tigard, and approval by �is offic� of another is c�uit� unlik�7.y. , *�* Robert Brown, a member of NPO �]. and of the Do�rntown Committee, quee��ianed �he tiu�3.ng o� thi.s proposa7.. �'he highest concern of the Dow�ito�rn Co�m3.ttee is traffic circulation. He �g�� a ons-block revieion of �he comp�ehensive plan in the light of an impending large-sca]:e stuQly of the larger probZem is not 3.n order. He felt� therelore, any action on t}�is should be deferred. ' �** J: B. $ishap, a proper�Cy o�ner and a member..of the Do�rntoxr� Committee� diecussed the tentative language in the staff repc�rt, �xhicb, he felt does not jus�ify a major revi.sion of the� compretiensive p�,�n. rhe:five-ye�r p7�ari tie3.n� worked on by City staff riowh�re addreeses� this str4et even'as an idea� much less as a �ub�ect o , , fundin�. He felt it �s tna �o riate' `�anc� ra�.sed cos�/benefit �'' ""` '�"�� , PP P , quea��ons. �� *** JoAnn Corless, 917.7 SW Burnhams asked �or�des�ial on thd basie of no �demand for i�.bx the neighborhood' an� no aonsid�rsst3�can wha�ever in:NPO #]: de].3berations on the arigina7. I3F0 #1. Planv ; , � CO2dMISS.,,,,,TON DZSCfU�wTON�AI�D C�A TTpN; Moen fe�.'��.�he,Co�mission �owes the'property owners a decisib'� �a3.rly Quickly. F��r_ ascertain�ci the jog in the strevt cou�:d be handl&d because the CSty dqes own the Palice S'tation, and that':�hera is a +s�re�t £roat Comtnercial to �Scoffinse Helmer� a�s a pro�er�y`�o�ner' bn Burnham, felt it.should no't tie put thrCU�gh. �kie cii'fficu].t�:os ��:n getting from Buxn�iaai bo` tti� ,Huneiker area are graater througli Ash-S�offine than by go��b�!: �ra� c�.f Ha�:� Boulevard. � ,� . , Y Hal.mer �th9� .QVED•�fo� ciex�ial, based an lacki ot' need, for it. Speaker agreeil, 'but can_.the:bas�� of ob�ect�ion by, .�.he railTpad a�d t�e Publi:c t1til�ta.es�Commissianbr. Speaker seconde�i,. Ov�ene asked what the si�uation ��ti].1 ba 1Q ;�.ears from now� and feared �i.�aatd xould becoma anothar Beaverton. ' ' Hoxard �urged tl�e proposal be passed on �o the City Gouncll� t�ho has the autYtority .tA order a study" xhich wou].d lead_to �he answer to the 'queation� Mr. Da�ris has been asldng for 2� years. He lieted proper- tie� �thich �e,pre�en�ly for sal�� and indicated'°�h��Rhole street could be possible wery suddenly. If� hotrever� it is tur��id down here, �the doot is essdnt�.ally olosod. ' $e pointed out that light rai7. �raneit wi11, be herd probabl.y with�.n ].0 years, and that that will bring sub- stan�C�.al changes. He advocatad ].eaving the door open for advance plannin�, and that the� C�unc3;7, h�s to give the ultimate decision. Zz� d�.scuss�,on o� �.7,tez�nativpe wpon� Staf�' and Corami:ssionexs, Howard MzrruTEs TT(�rARD PLANNIN(3 CO3�4iTSSION Ju�.�r 7�, �981 Fage 12 sug�agtad a poss�Lbi,lity vtas f�r t�ae Planniz�g Cotamiseion $o recom�end the Gouncil authosi2e a ma�or transpoactation study for the dorm�oWn core area a� a tool for City sta#'f to r►ork wlth in the future. Ths vate on th�a motion for denial failed 5 to 2, �rlth Tepad�.no and Helmer voting ayeo Owens MO�YEA approval o� CPR 11-81� based on staff findings and recommendations. Herron aeconded the motion, wh3.c.h c�rx!ied 5 to 2, He2met� 3�nd �epeciino votaLng nay. ' 5•8� �2EVIEW OF I�fiASE II PARK 217 NPO � A requeet by Z"t�amwell Crow to review progosed uses for Phet+se �I o f Park 217. ^ Hn�ardTwaa not asked to re�d his memorandvan to the Commiseion tlat�d ��ane 26� in whioh he recomm�nded �'ad�u�ted�� uses �o be a7.lo�►ed in P7�s'c� I Z. Rick Saitio of 2,iacKenzie/Saito & Associates, 0690 StY Bax��roft Street, Portland� reviewed the hietory of the development� which he termed a hu�e success. He recalled that a conditioa of the previous appraval ras that Phase IT uses come before the Plaraning Commission for•approval. ' There �vas n:o PQBS,TC TF:STIMONY. ' CONII�IISSIQN DISCUSSZON ANA ACTION: Speaker asked if thare �.s any possibility of acGess to Hunziker, responded to negatively by staff. Saito felt i� not to be nece�,st�ry. �iows�rd pointed out the develo�aent would be reqt�ir�d to i.nstall li;ghts at their eu�ense on Iiall Boulevard if a�nd KMera ��he waxrant� for �he light call for �.t. Tn disaus�z3,on coucernizag the uses pex�mitted, Saito stated their ai,nt wa� to get tenants Rho n�s�d lar$e e�eas, but who do z�ot generate muc.h vehicular traffic. Speaker MQVEA approwal o� Phase II of I?ark 217, based on staff find�.ngs and the recom,mex�da�ion ca].ling �or ODOT approval. of +a traffic study and the 11st oY "ad�u��ed'� commercia7. use�g. The mot3.one seconded by Helmbr, carried unanimously. . NEW BUSTNFS$: ', *+►� Howard exglai;,ned a s�,t4tation in .DaerVn�s Tn1et trhich req�ires a variance. + Tt was agread �h,q ina��er should come formal.ly befor� the Go,rn�iission at i.ts August mee�i3�g. *** Newton explai.ned �he c3.rcuras��nces tri.�ti r$�pect to the stree� vendore ordinatnce paesad by the Citiy Council. Herroa M�dV'ED ;�; �;;,.. f,;i I1>� . . � . � . � . . . . . . � .. � ( ,.... �„ ��.. . . . . . . . .. .. . - . . ... . .. .. .. . _ ... .� .. ��. . . . . _ . . .. f<'i � ' � � �:�� Mrrru��s i;�; `.t'�QrARD PLANIHINGr COM1�iZSSTON !' July� 7, 19$T �' Pbi�� .�;� i: tlie I'lanr►ing Commission au�ho��.2e the City �dminisi;ra��r to �.ssu� tbe '' , temporary use perm�.t� conterapl�e�ted by the ordinance. Kolleas seconded �' �he,1mot�.on,,�wh3.ch carried unan�ndusly. °1 ' *+�+� S�aker askec� if s�reet etsndarde sho.uld be the gaane for �' devploped areas as for new developmente. The etafS poi.n�ed out thie ! 3.s not possible under present Gode, and presentect reaeons Nhy i.� ;1 m3,$li;� be undesirab].e. It was suggested he �alk to Fraz#k Curria. ;j ' +�** Caunsel Su].1.�.�an reppr�ed prelim�nary findinge ott compl,ianee w3.tYi Cioal 10, Khich .he would expect to d�Lscuse trith the Gammiesion in A�uguet. �e h� pxspared a dxaft o� ac�m3nistrative procedures ior ' , Tig�rd, al�o to 'bb d3.ecuased in Augvst. Iie atated there are problems I'j w�.th' fittdings �t� tll�a procese af �aking them, and would 11ke to dlscuss ' this w3.t.b the Commiels3oa in an uz►hurried atmosphere. �� mhe meetin� �n�'o� at ii:5o. ; � i I . I� : _ . _ . ' � i I � CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �� PUBLIC NOTICE : TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 7, 1981 - 7: 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard PUBLIC HEARTNG5 5 .1 Conditional Use CU 4-81 KC's Amusements/Kittleson Brown NPO #2 A request by Jeff Chase and Mike Kimrey for a conditional use to approve retail sales of limited time t.o play various games such as electronic devices, pool tables and foosball, located in the Tigard Plaza, Suite 102, SW Hall and Pacific Highway. Washington County Tax Map 1S1 35DD Lot 2100. 5 .2 Subdivision S 10-81 Winter Lake/Century 21 NPO #7 A request by Century 21 for a time �xtension, new lotting and a minor change to Winter Lake Planned District Development located at the east side of 135th and the west side of 130th. Washington County Tax Map 1S1 33D Lets 300, 500, 601, 602 . 5 ,3 Remand of Comprehensive P1an Revision CPR 1-81 Willewbrook NPO #6 � A remand from City Council to the Planning Commission for recen- sideration of an approval of a Comprehensive P1an Revision from present NPO #6 Pldn Map zonin.g (density) classification to Al2 PD & A20 PD Urbar. Densities "Multi-family residential" between Naeve Road to the south and Evangle Cementary on the North, 99W to the west and 109th Avenue to the east. Wa.shington County Tax Map 2S1 lOA Lots 4200, 4390, 4402, 4500, 4600, Map 2S1 lOD Lots 500 and 600. 5 . 4 Comprehensive Plan ReVision CPR 10-81 Pente,rra Carp NPO #7 A request by The Penterra Corporation for a Comprehensive P1an �evision from R-7 (single family residential) to A-12 (multi- family residential) on 11.54 acres, located on the west side of 130th Avenue, south of Schools Ferry Rd. Washington County Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lot 200. 5 , 5 Conditional Use CU 6-81 David Schla-ht/E7,ectro�Sport NP0 #3 A request by Electro-Spoxt for a conditional. use for a family game cEnter, located in the Canterbury Shopping Center. Washington ,I County Tax Map 2S1 10�, Tax Lot 1700. 5 .6 Sensitive Lands Permit M 3-81 U.S .A. Scholls Sewer Trunk Line NPO #7 A request by The Unified Sewerage Agency for a Sensitive Lands � Permit to construct the Scholls sewer trunk line from S .W. Tiedeman west to S .W. 121st Avenue . Washington County Map 2S1 3AA (Tax lots) 100 and 101, 2S1 3A8 Tax lots 100 and 300, 1S1 34DC, Tax lots 3601, 3602, 3500 and 1200 1S1 34CD, Tax lots 100 and 1202. _ , .. ,. �.,, >- ;:., , ,: : _ _ _ __ _ _ _ .. . , _ . ,:w. Tigard Planning Commission Public Notice Meeting �^u Page 2 of 2 July 7, 1981 5.7 Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 11-81 NPO #1 A request by the City of Tigard for a Comprehensive Plan Revision tn add the extension of Ash Avenue through to Commercial Street to the NPO #1 Plan. 5. 8 Review of Phase II Park 217 NPO #4 A request by Tramwell Crow to review proposed uses for Phase II of Park 217. TT publish 6/23 & 7/2/81 �� ' �. �: : • � ,. . . .. �. _ ; i , ' 1 i I J�� vyµ AGENLIA N0. 5.1 TTGARD PL�NNfiNG C'Ct�lTSSZON July 7,1981 7:30 p.m. Fvwler Junior High-Lectu�re Rocxn 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard N0 S[78�TSS�Ct�I QF ,�ADTTTONA'L, MATERTAL BY A'P'PLICAN'r SHAI,L 8E N�DE AT THE �UBLTC HEA,R'iNG "LTNLESS THE .�FPLTCAN�.P I�S RE�QUESTED TO DO S0. SHOUI�D THI5 • OCC[]R, UN' �iJESTED, '.�iE 2TEM WTLL BE TY-fBLED UNTIL THE FOLIaWING HEART.NG. ' DOGKET: CONDfi'I'IONAL USE CU 4�81 1VP0 # 2 KC's �musements/Tigard Plaza AP�LIC�1ATc �Te�f Cha�e ' e Kin�se M�]t Y �u�,te 102 - Tigard Plaza T�.ga,rd, OR 97223 , C)WI�IER: ,Mi,lton Brc�m f Raymond Kittlesan ; 301 NW N�urray Rd �� Portl.and, OR 97229 �' �� , �� j..f REQiIFST: To rata.�x �nd a�prove Canditional Use for # 102 �- t� T,�gax� �'7,aza to permit retail sales of limited tiur� to �1ay gaznes � electronic devices, pool tables and foosball. �' S� UJC.A.T�ON: Tigard �1a,za F St�I #ia1,1 �l�d and k'acific Highway �� Washa.ngton County Tax Map l�l 35DD Lot 2100 �'`1 !!:I �:: ,:� Y$;28,Q20 CoridYtiori�T USes. In the C-3 zane the follaaing uses r;��l a�d theix �coe�sory uses maX be permitted as conditional uses when in '� accoxclanoe with Chapters 18.72 and 1a.84: �# Ii (2) ,1-�nusement erxterprise, including billi:ard or pool hall, bawling �_� a7,1eX, bc�x,i.ri� aren�, clance ha11, public swinmi.ng pools; i;:� �; i''; Sta,f f Ccem►�nt ��;� Since Apri;]. 1, ].981, tha.s ap,plicant has been lioensed by the Ci.ty. Apparently �, the �exson, Who i�sued th� Business License did not realize that an �rnasement oenter was a �diti,onal Use in the C�3 "General Ccmnercial" zone. �' �', G•: i� ��<.,, _ ° , I I i STAFF REPOR�' AC�NJ]P, N(3. 5. 1 TIGARD PI�NNING O�N�'BS5TON July 7 ,1981 GU 4-81 Pac� 2 of 'I'he City Council, resptanding ta lacal cancerns, asked the Planning Director to investigate t17e situation. Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use for the center. I. FTNDTNGS OF FACT 1) Section 18.28.020 oi' the Tigard Municipal Code allows amusem�nt oenters if the Planni,ng Car[ns.ssion approv�d a Conditianal Use. 2) Ama i� z�x�d C-3 "l�tail C.�rcia7.". zz. c�orTCr,usz� �Trronvcs 1) The proposed use is allowed as a oanditianal use in this zone. IIT:i.� STAFF RECCX'��'NL�F.TION Staff reoo��ndN a raval of this Cc�nditional Use with �the follo�wing ''i cond3.t,i.ons: 1� Z'his use sha11 be i.n effect for one (1) year. fram this date. If th� applicant areates a puHlic nuisanoe in the opinion of the �o7,ice Chief, th�s operation sha1.1 be t,eexminat�d imn�diately. �t the end o� �e C1) year t�,e c�nmer of this business shall request a,n �,rara,tin� a one (1) year extension by the Tigard City Council. .A], ' �'d � I �,nning Di,rectox .; � J . _ , , __ _ __ _ _ ___i , � � � � � �� 1 MEMORANDUM � May 14, 1981 I T0: Aldie Howard, Planning Director i 1 FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: K.C. 's Family Amusement Arcade � � I have talked with the owner and rnanager of this businesw, prior to their opening. The owner has had prior experience in the ' operation of arcadss of this nature; he plans to run this business l under specific rules of conduct to attract families, not allowing a rowdy environment, As of this date th�re have been no disturbarice calls to this business. There was a theft of empty beer bottles from a tavern � in the vicinity by Lwo former juvenile patrons of the arcade, and i one careless driving citatian issued to a person leaving the park- ing lot at Center Street. At this point in time, I see no reason for not allowing this business to cont-inue. , `��G�C�-'��G��-�.._ R.B. Adams ChieF of Police RBA:ac , ■i:".. _ . ,,.. ._ .., ,.. .. .. .. . - , � ; _ 1 . .. .. . ..... _ .. .. ._. ... ... .. . ._ .... _._ .. . r ,' ... __ ... ..w.. ... X^ �� CIVI� ENGINEERIPJG . r,',+ �� F�LA�INIi�lG•SU�tVEYlTdG +�' � ��;., ��'��r� ��r May 8, 1�81 38995 7igard !'lannirrg Commission c�ty of -r��3�a 12420 S.w". Main Tigard, Oregon q7223 RE: Winter Lake Dear C.c�mmission Memk�ers; . • ' On behalf of aur client, Centu�-y 21 Nomes, we are requesting an ex�.ension af xhe pianneci development approvat forWinxer La•ke. The City Council �pproved the planned developmer�t •of Wint�r Lak� on June 23rd, 198D, far Russell Krueyer. ►� Since that �ime the prnperty has been up for sale and Century 21 Hames just � recently purchased ito 7hey wish ta utilize the development ptan for the si�� witb mi�ar changes which are ailUwed to be approved by the Planning Director uncler Section 18.56.160 01= the zoning ardi�ance. An extension is r�qu�s�ed for the planned c�'evelopment appravaT t�ecause there �is not enough time tc� des i gn, sut�m i t and r�Ge i v� approv�l of the impr�v�ment }alans i n n�rder tc� hav+� substantial canst'ructiion take p1acP before June 23rd 1981 . Section 18.56.170 of �he zaning ordinance makes provisions for• extens�ions of time of �he delay is justifiable. We believe that the deTay is just�ifiable for a number o� re�sons. �'irst of all Century 2� Homes just pruchased the � I property and has not had enough time to da the required surveying, enginer�ring and ptatting necessary to start construction on the site. Secondly the econom�i�� lil canditions at the present time have slowed clown the home bui'lding industry which ha� cfelayed numerous projects. But, the biggest obstacle to deve{opmsnt ��' of this site t�as been the sewer line capacity. A sanitary sewer is. availiable ', to the site,. but the trunk lin� is undersized from S.W. 122nd Avenue, east �o ' the �anno Crsek interceptor line. �'he Unified Sewerage Agen�y in the last cauple of weeks has just approved the funding for the upsizin.g of this sewE�r line and should �be under construction this swmmer. 11080 S.W. ALLEN DLVD. / SUIT� 100 / DEAVEftTON, OREGON 97005 / (5Q3) 643-9410 „_ _� , .._ , ,t y > Tigard Pia:nning Commission • May 8, 1981 38995 Page 2 . , For these reasons we are requestirrg a one year time period to start construction although we are expecting to begin construction this summer. Thank you for your indulgence in this matter. Very Trwly Yours:, � WAKER ASSOCI ES, INC. (,��-. N ��`J��/”�'► I oe W�1 sh • ' ;•. Plannin� pirect.or � � . • , .,. � • .: . 4 CC: Centui�y 21 Homes Inc. .- � � . ''�' . �, JW./j M . . � � . . . � t � t . k . . ' ' . . . . ��. . . • - �. .�� G . . ` _ . , . . . ... . . �. . . . . . . . , . . . � . ��.�,. . ' + . . , . , . . . �.' �., - , ". . . . . . ��. . . . , � . . �'�. � ' . . . . , . . , � � �I�. � � ' � � . � - . , .. , .. � . � �. Y . . . ' . ��:��,. �! I, . �� '�=, ��. � , �f'' �' ��. . �, u � ■� _ _ : , r _ _ _ �..,...r._.,, . _ .. ._. ... � . . _ .. ._..... ,.._..... ., _ . ... .._ � �° .� �~}� , �� PL/ONBVIWG GSUtto/El�ING ��•� . ,yh��, _.;:.. ��1��w� ��'��./• May 8, 1981 38995 � Aldie Howard Planning Director City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Z'igard, Qregon 97223 Re: ' Winterlake Dear Aldie: , � On behalf of Century 21 F�omes, Tnc. the new owners of the Winterlake �rojeat, we are submitting a revised gene�al development plan and program whicl� meef.s tY�e provisians caf Section 18.560160 (Minor Chan es far the planning, directors apprnval. These changes have been proposed for various reasans. T�� most obv3oa� i� that the praperty was sold ax�d the new developer has different ideas, a�thouqYa not drastzc,. on the devsl.opment of �he site. When Century 21 Homes, It�c, purchase the property, they commi�ssioned our firm to do a boundary surv�y and design the exis-ting �lan to fit within the surveyed boundary. The oz°iginal preliminary plan was � drawn without the benefit of an actual boundary survey which � has made it difficult to compute the lot� and design the r. " street to conf�arm with that ori.ginal plan. � �� ;� The minnr changes that w� are proposing include replacing E' a short thru street with a cul-�3e-sac, relacating the duplex lot' s and eliminating four dupl�x lAts. The short thru street �� • was revised because it was inefficient and the area r.ould be + better �erved with a cul-�.e-sac. The duplex lots were re- � r: located so that they are across the street from either the (:' proposed multi-family area or the parke In relocating the F'� duplex lots we eliminated four c3uplex lots, which is 8 units, �� and exchanged them for 7 single family lots. This is a net �: deficit of one unit in the total project. �� Condition number three (3) o� th� approval for the �' planned development stated that each lot be designatec3 as to what is to be constructed on that lot. The revised plan does show this as all lots labeled with an "A" are to be attached single family and lots label.ed with a "D" are the duplex lots. • �' }; f 11080 S.W, ALLEN DLVD. / SUITE 100 / DEAVEfITON, Of�EGON 97005 / (503) 643-9410 � __ y ,..M.....,. .. .. :._...,.. . .:,_.._.,.... .`_ _ � ,� : � � Page 2 �: � Aldie Howard • � May 8, 19 81 � � Re: Winterlake -� � , , . All other lots are to he detached single f�;mily lots, - �� Plan of Developrne�t � The revised plan is broken into two phases as shown on � thE attached map. ' Fhase One inc:ludes 72 lats �nd the park site. �ut of � �the�e '72 l.c�ts, two (23 are duplex lot�s, twenty--eigh-� (?8) are attacher� siragle farnil.y and £QZty,twQ (42) are detac�ed � sin.c�le famity� PYiase Two` includes thirty-nine (39) lats � arnd th� multi-family �.�ea. This incl�.lc�es thirteen (13) -:; duplex lots, t:welve (12) a�tac.hed sinc�le famil� lnts� ��d ,_ � fpurteen �"l�J deta.ch.ec�. single �a�nily ].ots. The mu�.t�:-f�nlily � area would remaa,�n the same density wi,th, 13�3 77ni•ts. � We believe �hat this plan is better cc�nceived anc� �a's � znor� workable lots than the origin�l p:�an. Siriee w�e 'Yiave ' not cha�qed the baunc�aries, increav�c t�ie denait.y, or changed � �he uses`, �.hen I f��. that w� have :m�t all provisi.ons far a 4^ � minar �h�,nge, and look f.orwaLd to six�mitting a fzzial plat on :P PYaase One b�fore Jurie 23, 1981 . � �'l��i�k you for your inaulgEnce in this znatte*�� ;� , � V��y truly ya�rrs, � w�x�u As.SOCIAT�S, ;crtc� ,� , �,� �� U.Q ��..:+Cc� � (J�,�F Walsh � 'i�lanning Direc�or ,JVJ:m� � �;nalnsure � ce: Century 21 Hom�s, znc. r � f � � } 1� � � . . . � � . � � . . . . . � i . . .. . .� -�: �. . . . .. � .. . , . . . - � . ' . �. . . .� . � . . � � . � :,� . . .. . . . � . . .�.�. � ..�� c. . . . . . . . � �. -� . . , .. � . � . . .. :� � . . .. . . . . . . � � �. . � . �,�. �' . .. ... ' .,� :. . �. . '�:. �` . . . .. . . __-- — — STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5..3 TIGARD PLANNING CON�4T5STON Ju1y 7,1981 - 7:30 p.m. Fawler Junior High - Leature Roan 10�65 SW Walnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLIC�,NT SHALL SE MAI.IE AT Tf-IE PUBLIC HEARING iJNLESS Tf-3E APPLICANT IS �E�UESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCC(JR, UNREQi7ESTED, � ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL � FOL�4VINC HEA�2ING. '; � T�OC[�T: REMANI7 CC�.'RF�TSIVF�,PLAN REVISICd�1 CPR 1-81 NPO # 6 ± Willowbroak - Canterbury Heights � To �solve the Density Cansiderations ; Frc�r► Ci.ty CounciZ to Planriing Cca�anission � � AP�L�CANP: Gramco Devel��nt Co i 4730 SW N7�cadam � Portland, OR 97201 '1 i � C;WI�IEk?s Treeland Invest7nents Aase Husvar � 4730 SW�Macadam 12995 SH] Pacifa.c Hwy 1�ox�t7,and, OR 97201 Ti.gard, OR 972��. Joxn Petersr�n Wi1�ox.Erickson & Wesfi�rn Corp 13455 SW Cresmer R 4 Box 274 Tigard, OR 97223 Sher.wood, OR 97140 W�.11�,�t Sanders N➢IDS Investments 23256 Bents Road NE 750 Benjamin Franklin Bldg Auraxa OR 97C102 Portland, OR 97258 SITE L�CX'.ATION: Bet-ween Naeve Rr�ad to the Soutki and Evangle Ce.metary an the North� Highway 99W to the West and 109th Avenue to the East. Washington County Tax Maps 2S1 l0A Lots 4200, 4390, 4402, 4500 and 460Q; and 2S1 lOD Lots 500 and 600. Pl�'EVTOU� A�TTOI�1 On March 3, 1981, the P1ann�.rig CaYmissian approved CPR 1-81. The pri.n�y cc�ncern of the Crnmissian was that they be assured of review of a11 develo�ment in this particul.ar area with referenoe to density. The City Council reviewed CPR 1�81 on March 23, 1981, and x�nded the , issue to the Planning Cannission for density review. It was the opi.nion o� the Counci,l that tcaenty (20) un.its per acre was exoessive in relation to prope,rti,es included in tha�s request. � _ _,,_ _ .. . _ , ,. _ . .__ � ; _ _ _ . . . . . . ..... . . .... . .... .... .....4 II �, i � � 5TAFF F�PORT � AGQ3i]A NO'1 5. 3 � TIGARD PLAi�IING CQI�'�+1TSSION i July 7,1981 CPR 1-8T Page 2 of 3 STAFF NA�tFiAT1VE As proposed the following changes i.n the CaYrprehensive Plan ° i NPO # 6 Plan would be in effect if the Planning Cca��i.ssian ii approves. 'I'he only change frca�► the original applica.tion is for lot ' 500 of Map 251 1QD frcxn A-2U "Mu1ti-faQnily l�sidential" to A-12 P--D i� "Ntu.l.ti-family Residentia]. Platuze�. Unit Dev�lo�a�nt". ; i ; FINDZNGS OF �'�1CZ': 1. Ma� 2S1 10,1� -- � Lots 4200� & 4390. Treelarid Tnvestznent. Present z�ing Washington " County RU- . .10 acres. N�U # 6 designation, three (3) uni.ts �,� per acre. Ccmprehenszve Plan T�evision rec;uest to A-12 PD. t � �. Lot 44Q2. �1. B. fi�svar. Pz'esPnt zcaning Washingt�ri County RU-4. �' .-54�cres. NPO # 6 designates �hree (3) wnits p�r acre. Canprehensi�re � �l�n Repision �equest to A 20 PD. Lpt 45Q0. J. L. & S, �.'eterson. �resent zoning WashincJ'c:on County RiJ-4. 1,24 acxes. N�O # 6 desa.gnates thre� (3) urYits per acre. Ccx►1preYY�ensiVe P1an R�vision rec�uest to A 20 PD, � r. Lot 460Q, W�7.caa Eri,ckson & Western Corp. Present zoning Tnlashington t, Gcn.�ntX �U�-4. .76 acres. NPC) # 6 designates three (3) units pe•r i �cre. Canpx�ekiensiv� P1ain R�v�.s�.on �equ�st to A-20 1�D. Annexation ' ,. �eti.t,�i,on su�im�,tted. � � �� M� 2S1 1QD - � Lat 50Q. NID6 �xYwestments, Tnc. ;PreSent zon.i,ng Washington Cnurity C' RU�0.27 acres. NPO # 6 des�,gnates two (2) units (noxth) and � e�,c�ht C8) units Csouth� . Catlprehensive �1an Revision request to � �12 �D. � T;ot 6Q0. {nT. B. & C� M. Sanders. Present zoning Wastiingtan � Count� I�U^4. 8.27 acre�. N�PO # 6 designates twn (2) units (north) � and pic�ht C81 un�,ts Csouth) . Canprehensive Plan Revisi� request to A�20 �D. Annexatj,on petition submitted. � s l�ap..251 10�. � Lots 440Q & 4401. Z'hese lots vaere annexed in 1979. No Tiga�l Zone . �,. es �na on as- n app7.ied flor. Ntrs. .�3erson is not participating in th�s ap�l3catiorn. j 1�� 2�1 1QD � Lat 700. 1�r. Geoxc�e cou�,d no� be fo�d. Property no�t included in this � proposaT Property outside City. No annexation petition received. i i I STAF'F' REPORT I; AC�I�11]A NO. 5. 3 ; TIGARD PLANNING CC�'MISSION Y July 7,1.981 � CPR 1-81 Page 3 of 2Sl 10A - �; Lots 4100 & 4201. Mr. Annand did not wish to participate in this 4 �pplication. Z'he NPO # 6 Plan ��r this area shavs density designations entmierated � abov�. Applicants are requesting the Ccenprehensive Plan R�visions � en�rated ahav�. � 2. A copy of NPO # 6 Plan is made as F..xhibit "B" to this Staff I�eport. ! Cccrrrents can this Plan relatiw to this appl�.cation are made in a general ' s�atemerit as fo11c3ws: 1. The density issue (Policy 1-2) which is addressed in the NPO Plan is the main issue. 'I�e applicants are requesting incr�ased densities. The N�O �1an addresses the conclitice�s to be met for developn►ent. (P�licy3 - 4 � 5 - 6 - 7 - 8) ?.. Publxa serv�oes: Sewer is availak>le r►orth to se.rve lots 4200 and 4390. Tualatin D�veloXxnent Tnc. wi11 install a line to 109�h and Naeve �txe�t to serve Sunxrerfield XIV. I�iajor �tre�t improvements Hr;,�,�, �e made as deve7,a�t�nt takes p1ao�. A1.1 proposed develognent w��.�. ksp as Planned De�velo�ants under Chapter 18.56 of the Tigard 1�funic.ipa7, Code, 3. The �1,ann,ed Dev�elo�_nt (PD1, desic�nation a7.laas a preliminary and general p1a� x�view befoie the �lanning Ccnmi.ssi�, and the City Council must �rove �in�1 �1ans. ,Amp1e p�^avisions a:s made for public cocRr�ent. 44 i�.'0 # 6 ��,an w�s appxoved �y the Co�ncil on ,Apri1 24, 1978 by Ordinance �, 78�-27. N�O .# 6 has not znet formally s�nce prior to Sept�ember 197R. - The �,�t, ccx�er.t �ceived 3� 5taff fram NPO # 6 was in response to St�� port CPR 4-79 in the �orm of a �et�ter fran Mr. McPhillips, N,PO # 6 Ctzaixpexson e STAE'F F�C�NDATION: All develo�ar�xit on these lots shall be brought before the Planning Carmissian as Plai�d Unit bevelo�xnents and that the density in each case be reviewed as a portion o� these rev�,ew processes. ,�e xng D�,rectflr ` , .� � - __ _ �_ �; I STAFF REPORT AGENDA No. 5 .4 TIGARII PLANNING COMMZSSIOIQ July 7, 1981 - 7s30 p,m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room . 10865 5W Walnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMISSION CJF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARIrTG UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE TTEM WILL BE TABLEL UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HEARTNG. DOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION (CPR 10-81) Penterra Corporation - 1.30th Avenue N'PO #7 APPLICANT: �'enterra Corporation 12225 S.W. Second St. Suite 201 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 APPLTCATION June 2, 1981 DATED: SITE LO�ATION: 130th Avenue South of Scholls Ferry Road. Washington Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D Lot 200, 11.54 acres. REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan. Revision from current Tigard R-7 single-family residential zone to 1�,-12 multi-family zone on 11.54 acres in NP,O #7 area with a Planned Unit Development designation (PD) . PREVIOUS ACTION:Parcel was annexed to the City by Boundary Commission final order #1518 and '1'igard Ordinance 80-20 approved on. February 25, 1980. The owners of the parcel approached the staff relative to development approximately one year ago. The Park Board was asked to comment on the proposed "tradeoff" of higher density in exchange for tlze dedication of approximately four acres for Summerlake Park. The Sununerlake Park plan shows that tennis courts are proposed on a portion of this property. The plan also envisions the dedication of approximately three acres of this parcel which is with the floodplain. The Park Board adopted a policy which stated that in cases such as this they would support increased density in exchange for dedicated park areas. When the Winterlake development ta the South was approvecl, S.W. 130th Avenue was designed to continue through this parcel to the Grabhorn piece to the North, thus completing 130th to Scholls Ferry Fto�d. This particular parc;el of 11 acres amounts to about 4 acres when the floodplain is donated, the park �_ � STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING COMM. Agenda. No. 5 .4 P age Two area is donated and 130th Avenue is extended. It is tlze opinion of Staff that these circumstances necessitate an increase in density on the "buildable" portion remaining. The City Council has supported this "trade-oft" policy in the past and is familiar with the Park Board's decision on this particular parcel. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. NPO #7 policies are appropriate as follows : Policy 4, 5, 9,10,11,12,13 and 14. See attached Fxhibit "A" NPO #7 Plan. 2 . A full line of urban services are available to this site . 3 . The adopted Summerlake Park (Regional) Pl.an has been adopted by the Park Board, Planning Commission and City Council . A portion of � this parcel is included in this plan. 4. S .W. 13Oth Avez�ue has been designed North to Schall's Ferry Road from Winterlake through : this parcel. � ' ' S . The Park Board has reviewed this parcel � relative to future development and has adopted a policy which supports �cn increased density in exchange for parlc land. II . CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1 . All development on this parcel shall be brought before thE Planning Commission as I a Planned Developrnent. ' 2 . Dedication of lands in the floodplain and in the Summerlake Park plan shall be made as appropx'iate prior to or in conjunction with development. 3. The �ark Board has reviewed this parcel in relation to future park de��elopment. 4 . The affected NPO has clearly indicated through var�ous policies that it supports increased I� density in this general area. �, . �,.: : _ _ ,, . . ,: ._. . .. , ,,.�., ._.,. . . . ;.1 ��.. �, STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING COMM. Agenda No. 5 .4 Page Three 5 . It seems appropriate that the zoning b� changed to permit increased density. The City in this case is requ�sting approximately seven of the eleven acres for public purposes. It is the fee7.ing of Staff that this faat alone is enough to grant a zone change : III . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this CompreYiensive Plan Revision. (Washington Co. R�o Tigard R-7 to Tigard Al2 PD.) H Plannin i or i � , �` _., .. „ . ,... �.. ___ _ . , a . � � . . . . . . . � . .. ... � . . .. .. : . . . ��'1 STAFF REPORT AGENnA No. 5.5 fiIGARD PLANNING COMMISSIOIV July 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - LecturE Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMISSIt�N OF ADDITIQNAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THE 1�PPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO L�O SO. SHDULD THIS OrCUR, UNREQUESTED, THF TTEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWTNG HEARING. DOCKET: Conditional Us� CU6-81 Electro-Sport at Canterbury �quare Shopping Center NPO �3 APPLICANT: David Schlaht 4� Hillshire Drive Lake Oswego, Oregnn 97n34 REQUEST: For a Coi�.ditional Use to operate an amusement enterprise in a General Commercial Zone (C-3) . I . FIND2NGS OF` F1�CT: 1. Cod� section 18 .28 .020 Cond�.tional Use in the C-3 General Commexcial zone permits amusement enterpxises if the Planning Commission approves the use . 2 . P,p�l,icant is proposxng to operate a family game center at Canterbuxy Square 5hopping Cen.ter. zI. CONCLUSZONPaRY FZNDINGS: l. This �acila.ty is allowed as a Cand,itional Use in the C-3 zone . IzI. STAFk' RECOM,MENDATION: --- I Staff recommends approval wath the foll�wing ;. conditions: lo Applicant to obtain a Sign Perrr►it. ' 2 . I� a "nuisance" is cxeated as defined a.n Code Secti�n '7.40, and the Ta,gard Police Dept. f,�nds that the applicant is in part in violation of the Code, the appl�,cant sha11 be brought before the City Counci;7. and maX be subject to reVOC�tion p� thi,s Conditional Use . STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING COMM. Agenda No. 5 .5 Page Two 3 . No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and ; changes are approved by that departmen.t. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable �rawings. I �I ; , i I I , ie Planni irector i` i � _ June 26 , 1981 MEN�OR�,NDUI� To: Planr�ing Commissinn From: Planninc� Department Subject: Sens�,tive Lands Permit for Unified Sewezage Agency of Washington County (I�3�81� The Sensitive Lands Oxdinance Ozd�.n�nce 79�73 allows the i.nstallation af sewer trunks if a �exmit is approved by the Planning Commissi,on. c. Th�s application is very clea,xlX ex�la,in�d in th� enclosed material. Sta£f recoznmendS a�proval. ►: � � � � .t _ . �� ' : � ' � �� S 10 04CD 1200 I � �-�.-� / /�� `J w - lS 1340, � � < i�350 � y � _ i Zc2 . �� G — � e��. �: • � 1 � . � S.W. KATHERINE ST. ' .- - .. � � �� . . : y ,� 3602 � � • IS 1 34DC ' 3 6 0 I �— �. � _ -� i �� ,- �;: :. 2S I 3A8 _ 2S I 3A8 r-- „� � �J�J ;>; . �^��- .... �--- a� �� 340 100 J, � /T , ` U Ar� ,_i , \ _�� C/ :c' .. � .� �N� • -.�,. �� 2S i 3Ai� �� S.�y, �� ' � � � ,.i. ./ � � t0o ��f � { ' — , —'� 2 S I SAA I IOI j C � . RE EK � , I � - � � � � . S:W. WALidUT ST. ----� f � __ f � � `�,. . �'��.., S SU(�MARY STATEMENT FOR APpLICA7I0N OF SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT � � The followi:ng is a summary statement regarding the effect that the installation i of the underground sewer pipe will have on the flood plain area: ; The proposed work consists of constructing a major undergound sewer pipeline. No dikes, dams, permanent fills, or permanent excavations are required or allowed as a part o� the proposed work. Diversions or rechanneliny of the stream will not be allowed. The physical character of the fload plain wi'11 not be altered. Areas disturbed ay the constructic�n will beshaped, graded, and restored as near as practi:cable to their original ground elevations and contours. Filling or wasti:ng of excess material within the flood plain wi11 not be allQwed. The proposed work wi'll not hydraulically affect the flood plain capacity. Si'nce fi:lling or wasting of excess material wi:11 not be permitted within the flood plain, no land use no�t already permitted wi'll be established. Contractors are required to take whatever precautions are necessary to prevent damage to or hazard to any structures adjacent to the construction areas, and must aiso comply with OSHA requirements pertaining to hazards of health, safety, and welfare. No immediate or long-range hazards as a result o� the project wi11 affect adjacent properties. Since no filling will be permi'tt�d within the flood plain, no impacts or public safety problem� asso�iated w�ith subsequent high water in the project area wi11 occur as a result of the proposed work. Duri:ng construction in all traffi'c areas, the contractors are required to comply wi:th the State of Oreg�on and Washi'ngtan County tra�fic controi and safety requirements. During construction in nantraffi'c areas, the contractors are requi'red to noti'fy� property owners 48 hours in advance of construction on their property. Clearing ahead of the trenchirig operations will be limited so that the entire .9-mile lang project area will not b�e cleared w:hen the project begins and 6e left unrestored unti7 it is comp�eted. Backfilling, cleanup, replanti'ng, and reseeding beh,ind the pi.pe laying will also be contro1led twithin specified li'mi�s. These limitations on cl eari'ng and restorati on wi'l l mi�nimi ze tfi,e l ength of di sturbed area and the amount of time which an area i:s impacted. Considerable emphasis has been given to redeedi'ng and replanting in an effort to reestablish essential p1ant growth necessary for wildTife use and to minimize erosion. Areas along the project have been classi:, fied as residenti'al pasture land, culti'vated fields, and creek banks. i �� -.,� �. ��; Topsoil must be removed and replaced throughout the enti�re proje.ct. All areas distur6ed 6y the contractor, whe�her presently seeded or not, will be reseeded upon completion of the b.ackfi'lling operation to provide for grass cover to prevent erosi'on. 7he preponderance of land along the project route is Tigard School District property, residenti'al , pasture land, or� cultivated fields�. Pasture lands and cultivated fields will be reseeded and will not change from their original use as a result of thi's pro�ect. No si;c�nificant land use change is anticipated wi'thi'n the limits of the project. . STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5 .7 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 70 1981 7.30 p.m. Fowler Junior High-Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard � �� NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THE APPLTCANT IS REQUESTED TO DO S0. SHOULD THTS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABI�ED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HEARING. DOCKET: Comprehensive Plan Rev. CPR (City of Tigard) APPLICANT: City of Tigard LOCATION: Between S.W. Burnham St. and S.W. Commercial St. aligning w�.th Ash Avenue to the Narth and South crossing two existing railroad rights-of-way. (Washington Co. 27ap 2S1 2AD. Lots included: 1800, 1700, 1600, 1601, 2800, 1203, 1201, 1200, 900 and 1000.) STAFF COMMENT: Mr. Davis, $975 S .W. Burnham appeared before the CitX Counci,l an June 8, 19�1, and requested that he be g.iven some i.dea concerning the Council's intent to continue AsYa Street through h.i� property, City Council directed Staff to �re�are a Comprehensive Plan Revised Staff Report �or presentation to the Planning Commission on the July 7, 1981 agenda. I. k'INDxNGS OF k'ACT: l. Interstate T-5 , 72nd .AVenue, Hall Blvd. , 99W and 121st ,Avenue are the major North-Sauth carriers ira th�s community. Topography, poli- tical acti,on and histc�ry ha�re combined to construct these carriers, but these forces have li�ited the extension of Ash Avenue in the do�ntown core area. The City Council on June 29, �.981 supported a proposal to uphold Policy 2� o� the NPO #1 which called for the extensi�on of �1sh Avenue across Fanno Creek. �taff wa� asked to prepare a "time-frame" in wh.�,ch �ajor street �iznprovements wou"ld be made to e1,e�ni,ate access to the established Ash Avenue xeS�,d,ential area. This will be presented in "dxa�t form" to the Council by the end of Ju1y. � Cornpzehensi.ve ��a,n (NPO k?lan) Revision would the� be brough� be,�ore the Planna,ng Commission fo7,l,owing xeview of NPO #l. � _ — . . . . ,. .. .F ; ...;, .. ., ...... _ . ., . ,... � - �. � ��.,�.. ..� . Y � STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5 .7 Page Two Policy 28 has been upheld with modification pending. In an effort to give Mr. Davis some concrete answers we should now consider the importance of extending Ash Avenue to Commercial Street. Mr. Davis is understandably frustrated, but since my first encounter with him, perhaps two years ago, I have tried to explain the issues. If Ash Aven.ue is extended it must go across Mr. Davis ' property to the railroad behind the Prairie Market to Commercial Street. This is a "long-range planning" issue and when these ,issues ar�.se it is ex�remely difficult for Staff to present �'indings af fact to support a 11this looks logical" stanc� . How�v�r, the City is conaidezing the formation of an Urban Renewal/Revitalizat�.on 2�ging/Plan. One of the major segments o� this will be a Transpnrtation �l�n W�,th a traffic report. Staff anticipates th�t th,is plan �voul.d endars� this proposed change in the Comprehensive �lan. This "feeling" �s strengthened by the Caunc,ils ' action on ,7une 29th xelated to �1sh Avenue. The question is no ;�onger "'I� T�sh �,venue is extended°', but n,ow "When ,�,sh Avenue is extended, what is the C�,tx' s positxon?" . � The on�,x way to reso�.ve th.�,s is to go through: I thi,s �xoces�. 3f yau support the recommendation o,� Staff, We would foxwa,rd your decision to the ' Ci,ty Counc�T, �or a review at a Public Hearing la,ter thi.s z�lonth. 2 . The City �ounc�,� at a Spec�.�l Meeting held on June 29 , 1981 xeviewed Polic�r 28 of the NPO #1 �'3a�n. The minutes nf this meeting are availab�.e for rev�ew. The �ina1 motion on this issue was a;s �ol�ows: Council requested tl�at Planning Staff prepare and submit to Council within 30 days an amendment of the Comprehensive �lan speaking to the traffic issues on Ash Avenue, the languac�e to presczibe steps to be ta�en to preserv�e the local street chaxactex o� Ash Avenue i� and when �t �,s extended. ►' __ __ _ __- __ _ _ ___ ____- _ __._. ._ .__. ... _...�_._.. _..�. ...._.:_...., .__ ._____�... , _ _.. _..�.. ..... . ..... .___..�...._..I . . _ _ . _ _ . . . ._ _ _ . _. __ _ _ _. �. , I i STAFF REPORT �' AGENDA NO. 5 .7 �, Page Three � ��. �. 3. The extension of 5 .We Ash Avenue North across � the railroad R.O.W, to S.W. Commercial Str•eet does not appear on the Comprehensive Plan, i nor is it included in the "draft" of the � Comprehensive Street Improvement Plan now under study by the City Council. � 4. The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) of the � State, Mr. David Astil, has been notified of � this possible crossing of the railroad RoO.W. N �taff has suggested that the Burlington Northern r R.O.W. and the Southern Pa�ific R.O.W. be merged into one "joint-tx�act" in the future. We h�ve � had t1exploratory" conversations with railroad � offici�ls and the k�UC, but have n�t journalized a s tudy. 5 . At the present ti,me a portion af ta� lot 1800 i� vacant �ront,i.ng S .V�I. Burnham St. and tax lot 1200 is vacant fronting on S .W. Commer�ial. 6 . A3x, D�vis, ownex o,� tax lot 1800 has n�t made � foxma7, �pp�,icat�,on to devel�p his vacant ��opexty. Sta�f h.as xev,iewed certain aspects of poSSib].e dev�elopment with him in the past. IT. CONCLUSIpN FINDINGS: 1 . S .W. Ash �,�enue �t�ri1,1 eventuallx be extex�ded North acxoss Fanno Creek to S.W. Burnham St. By the time this becomes a reality, significant ' developm�nt w�,�.1 have t�ken p�.ace in the downtown � coxe axe�, xt �,� corzce�,��b1e that an Urban �enew�l �g�,ng wi�.�, be appx'oved by the City Counc�tl WXth�.n sa.x znonths, and �.t is anticipated th.at d �ajox txa�,fic study will be necessary ,r•e�,ated to the �7,a,n brought about through t�rban Renewa,l and the efforts of the Downtown Co�Xttee. With this in mind it can be concluded that S .W. Ash Avenue ma.y piay an important part in a traffic circulation plari/pattern in the core area. Tt can also be concluded that should the City allow development or Mr. Davis ' vacant property that in the future, through condemna- t�,on, the purchase price for necessary right-of- way would escalate substantially. � _ , , , .. . ,, _ ,.,,, 1� _ STAF'F REPORT AGENDA NO, 5e7 Page �'our I This financial aspect of �this action is ! important. Zf the Plann.ing Commission approves � this extension, they will obligate the City Council for an expenditure of funds in the future if the City Council aspi.res to extend Ash Avenue to Commercial St. As always, Council will have to decide on a f'unding sc�urce. Tt would be possible with Uxban Renewal Aging funds in the future . IIT . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: II i Staff recommends that SW �1sh Avenue be extended � through the Davis property across the railr�ad t, R.OoW. t� S .W. Coinmercial St. �' {I� - il �i'!X�(/�/ �.-- �{' A,ldie How rd �� f'. Planna.ng Director �, i I ; I , � � ({ f ft I:i �5 I j a �l �,: �� ?, � '� �} i . : 6 , � „ _ _ _ . - .:. f _ _ _ _ _ __ iR � _ � Neighborhood Plannin� Organization ,�1 - 30 June 1981 Special Meeting NPO �1 called a special meeting to discuss the staff report regarding the extension of Ask� Avenue from Burnham to Commercia'l. The consenses of opinioz� was tha.t No action be taken on the Comprehensive Plan Review at this titne for the following re�,sons: 1) The City of Tigard has not demonstrated with any � . tual studies the need or cost of the extension. ,._--�r-----�-- 2) The idea of a "Comprehensive Plan" sugges-ts that the entire plan area should be reviewed al1 at once, not just a ane block area. Fun.ding is eminent for the Downtown Revitalization Study which has traffic circulation as its highest priority. 3) Financial consideration should be given to the r� cost/benefit ratio of this street. Also the financial liability �o the city and its residents may be consider- able. Financing methods shnuld be assessed. ` Respectfully, f � `A�'� �.�''.r:/;'..%"%.:'�.•�:i�/� Chairperson NPO �1 � � � _ , � June 26 , 1981 MEMORANDUM � TO: PLANNING COMMIISSION I FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR � I SUBJECT: PARK 217 TRAMMELL CROW NPO #5 i Western Racquet Clubs, Inc. came through this department on May 31, 1978 for Zone Change 36-77 . This request was for a Planned Development (PD) designation for the two zones included in this parcel - C-3 General Commercial and M-3 Light Industrial. This project went to the Ci"ty Council as Ordinance 78-77 on November 27, 1978 and was approved. (Ref, file ZC PD 3-80 Park 217 Business Center.) No development took place on site and the property changed hands . In December of 1979, Trammell Crow, Mr. Bruce Hosford, requested a one year extensi,on of the PD-ZC 36-77 . The Planning Commission approved this extension. Trammell Crow applied �or a major change in a General P1an (PD) review in February of 1980. On March 18, 1980 the Planning Commission approved the application and added a cond,ition "18 . Prior to the start of construction on Phase II, a.pplicant shall submit to the Planning Commission a list of pxoposed commercial uses. " On May 12 , 1980, the City Council revi,ewed thi,s project and amended Ordinance 7f3-77 which included canditions of development. This amendment became Ordinance 80-�38. A Site Design Review application was made (SDR 12-80) on June 6, 1980 and construction followedw The first major tennant was the SOVA Furniture warehouse, followed by several other retailers, a John Deer Tractar sal.es and service outlet and then Smith's Home Furnishings warehouse. Recently Tr�.mme11 Crow notified Staff of its intention to start con.structi.on of Phase IT, zoned M-3 Light Industrial. Under the code section 18 .48 .010, warehousing, wholesale distribution or sale businesses are allowed. It is clea?- from the orig�.nal approval that the applicant asked for a combination of uses for this site, and was granted the necessary approvals. Condit�.on 18 was added to insure that Phase II be reviewed. Staff recommends that you authorize uses as "adjusted" and subject Phase II to Site Design Review. One of the conditions of Site Design �eview wil]. be ODOT approval of � a Tra�fic Study partic�.�7.a,r�.y xelative to the �ia11 B�vd. access . .� . � TRAMME7.,L CROW COMPANY PARK 217 "ADJUSTED" COMMERCIAL USE5 FOR PHASE II Appliance store (performing incidental repairs) Bank loan company or other financial institution Blueprinting, photostating or other reproduction process Business machi.nes, retail sales and service Commercial schools such as business colleges , music conservatories and. trade schools Department store Furni.�ure store Gar.den supply sto�e Hardware store Instruments, scientific �r professional (repair shop) Medical-dental clinic Office buildings, bank � Printing shop and newspaper publishing . Professional or commercial office building Real estat� Office Warehousing Wholesale distribution or sales business � I - - — - -- -- -- _ -- . _ .. _._._ __....�__ . _ __. ___ ._.._.,___ ._._._�� . ..,_,e____._ . . _ _ J _ _ t 1ViACKENZIE/SAIT� & ASSOCIATES, P.C. � 4 �7un.e 17, 1981 �� Mr. Aldie Howard { Planning Director City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Park 217, Phase II #28:1328 Dear A1die: . . . . . In accordance with aur discussion held in your off ice June 15, 1981, incluciing Aldie Howard, Frank Currie, Rick Saito, Lynn Takeuchi and Reg McDona:Ld, �+re discussed the captioned project. 4 As you recall the approved pl.an development for this E project generally permitted uses listed within the � Tigard planning ordinance £or the general commercial � zone (C-3) light industrial zone (M-3) and the ` � industrial park zone (M-�4) . Permitted and conditional � uses in these zones. We d�.scussed the need to comply with City e�f Tigard' s condition #18 of ordinance #80-38 . Condition #18 � states, '"Prior to the start of construction of Phase II, applicant shall submit to Planning Commission a list � of proposed commercial uses" . } � Please find enclosed a list of proposed commercial uses. You ir�dicated that by submitting this letter ; no later than June 17 , 1981 we will be p].aced as the last item on the Planning Commission Agenda for July 7, 1981. We will be in touch prior to the July 7 , 1981 meeting to clarify time, location and any questions you might have. Sincerely, c ° �'�"!�ra��; �=-,�.,�`��'�'1�! Lynn Takeuchi Architect LT:lp ARCHITECTS ' ENGINEERS PLANNERS 0690 S.W. BAN�ROFT STREET • PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 • PHONE 503/224-9570 �' � _ .