The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 05/05/1981 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. '� II AGENDA TIG�IRD PLANNING COMMISSION , MAY 5, ].981 - 7:30 p.m. I FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard 1. Open Nleeting 2. Ro11 Call 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting 4. Planning Commission Communication 5. Public Hearing: A. Staff Report • B. A�plicant's A,resentat�on C. Public Test�mony 1. Proponent's 2. Opponent's 3. CxaSs Examirnati:on 5.1 VARIANCE V4-81 (HEIDZ Q1�RK SUBDi'VISION/ED GAUSE) NPO # 3 I 5.2 SUBDIVISION S 3-81 (COLONY" CREEK PIEASE IT & IIT) NPQ # 3 5.3 ZONE CHANG�; PD ZCPD 4��81 (JDG DEVELOPI�ENT) NPO # 6 5,4 COMPREHENSTyE �L1�N REj7TSTdN CPR 6-81 (BONITA pARK/CHATTERLEY) NPO # 5 S.5 CQ1��R�HENSIVE �Ll�N REVISION/ CPR 8*-9 81 (1�IN STREFT DEVE.LOPMENT/ JB BTSHCyP) NPO # 1 6. Old Busine�s 7. New Business 8. Other Bus�;ness 9. ,�djournment I � i ; 1, i , 3...., ._�..�.�.�....,... . .. . . , , ..:... . . . �. , : _.,_ _.. ._.�.� :..:,. .� ... : .::t. . :.�::_....,u. �._.. �._.'�_.....,. :.. _�... ..:...�._u_ _. PUBLIC NOTTCE TIGARD PLANNII3G COMMISSION 2�4AX 5, 1981 - 7:3� p.m. FOWLEFt JUNIOR HTGH - LECTUF2E ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Si�reet, Tigard PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 I4635 SW 133, Tigard VARIANCE V 4-81 (Heidi Park Subdivision/Ed Gause) NPO # 3 A request , for a variance to minimum lot size of 7500 square feet per lot in a R7 Zone -"Single FaTnily R�esidential". Washington Caunty Tax Map 28'1 3Db Lot 1301 5.2 Colony Creek - Hall and SW Greensward Zane Si7BDIVISION S 3-81 (Colony �reek Phase IS & ITI) NPO # °� A review of Phase IT and I'tT on this project. Washington County Tax Map 2S1 l2 BB Lots 100, 3400, 3600, �130�. 5.3 SW 109t:h ancl Canterbury Fieights (JDG Development) NPO # 6 � �ONE CHANGE PLANNED DISTRICT DEVEIAPMENx ZCPD 4-$:L NPO # 6 A xequest fox a zone change from Al2 "Multi-family°' to Al2 PD Washington County Tax Ma� 2S1 lOAD �f�ts 8803 and 8804 5 a4 14S 75 5W� 79, Tigard COMPREHENSTVE PL'AN REVISION CPR, Fa-81 (BONITA PARK/CHATTERLFY) IJPO # 5 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from R7 "Sinqle Family Residential' 7y�SOQ sq. ft. per lot" to RS "Single Family Residential I �,OQO sq. :�t. per 1ot"' on 1.8 acres to construct four ('4) attaahed !� single €amily units and two (2� detached �single family units ', Washington County T�c Map 2S1 12B Lot 4000. ' 5.5 SW Ma�,n 5treet and Ash Avenue COMPE2EHENST'VE PLAN REV�SION CPR 8 & 9-81 (MAZN STREET/�' B BISHOP) NPO # 1 A request to change the Comprehensive �lan Designation for approximately �our (4). acres on 1�s�. Street from Al2 "•Multi-Family" to C3M "Main Street Commezci.al'�; and a request for a Freliminary Planned Unit Development �or agpxoximately sixteen (16y acres between SW Main and Asfi Avenue. Please run th.is Wednesday May 22, and May 'l9, 1981. MzN�r�ns TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION rtay5� 1981. � 7:30p.m. Fowler Junior High ,. Zecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, oR Vice President Speaker called tixe meeting to order at 7;35: ROI.L CALL: Presen�t: Bonn, Funk, Helmery �Ierron, lKolleas, Owens, Spea�xer, Moen �ccused: Tepedino Absent; None Staff: Howard, Newton Since ther.e were no additlons or corrections to the MINUTES of the April 7 meeGinga they wexe approved as submitted, OOMMUNIC�.'PIONS: The pxesicient ackMOwledged receipt by planning commission members of a numbe� of letters concerning t�vo matters: the �+.nale�s Glesa�� Subdivision on 94th Avenue, which wil� be k�eard as an appea�. of the planning direGtor°s dec3.sion, at �he June 2 moeting of the comma.s- sion; and several letters from ra�idents of Ash Avenue pro�esting the ex�ension of Ash Avenue. These wiZl be considered �t �n appropriate time. Cammi�sioner Funk inquzred About a protest against the �'penny arcade" ��pe of business which has moved into the Tigard Plaza, appaarently �rithout pz�oper authority fz�om the city. Howax•d explai�ned the situa�ion, and sta�ed the city is awaxe o:f it and is working to get the owner �.n compliance. (Note: A conditianal use request for this busin�ss will be on �Y�e Juno 2 aganda af �he commiss:ion.) � The presiden� read the usual notice of authoxity �'or and. procedure to be fo].lowed in the maeting. He then opened the meeting far PUBLIC H�AI2INGS. 5.1 VARTANCE V �.-81 (HEIDI PARK SUBDIVISTON/EA GAUSE) I�PO #3 A reqqost for a variance to minimum lot eize af 7500 square feet per� ].ot in an R-7 Zone - �'Single k'amily Residential�'. Washington Coun,ty Tax MaF 2S1 3DD Lot ].301. Howard read �he STAF"�' REPORT and R�C�MMENDATTONS. � The APPLICANT'S �R�S�TJTA�ION was made by Beth Blount� 2�.37 Pacific I Avonue, Foras� arone, attor�e�+ for tt�e applicant. She called attention �I' �o the very small lots with cpmmon-wall homes diz�ectly to the east, and ' d.uplexes on larger lots t� the south. Sb�e took up the four requirements fox• a va.riance in �urn. She chpiracterizpd the extensive strea� improvemen�s i� � h �I ;I �,,. . _ , M�NTdT�S TIC�ARD PZANNING COMMISSTON Ma y 5, 1981 Page �. I on tw4 stree�ts for a small development as "exoepti.onal or extraordinary conditions" which ap�ly to this property. ,The adjoining properties to the east a�,c� south are deweloged at �ubstantially higher densities. She felt the proposed single family re�idence�s, e�ren if o� smaller 1ots, would be a gaod buffex for the single family residences to the north from �he duplexes to the south. She pointed out the request is for onl.y one additional lot over which �o spread tha appraximately ��.S,OOU devel- opment cost, and opined we wi11 get many mo�e vari.ance requests ar� i0ila�fill'� situati.on.s are develaped. The applicant agrees w3.fih the conditions. There was no I'UBLIC TE5TTMONY. CROSS-EXAMINATTQN t►ND REBUTTAT,: Spealr�r asked what �he hard�sh�p is From which the applicant seeks relief. Ms. Blount stated it is economic--he seekcs the ability to spread h3,s development costs ov�r an additional lot. Speaker asked what is the property ri.ght ta be preserved ' substantially the same as owners in tho vicinity. Dlount replied the neighboring residences are built on �ubstant�ally s�a'ller 10�,� wi�Gh correspondingly smaller development costs per lot. Speaker asked what excep�ional or extraordinary conditions applied to this property. Blou.nt listed the shape of t.he property and the require�sent thd� Garden Park Place �o through his property, since he cauld h�ve �erved his propexty very adequately off 110th; h� is inheritin� a situata.on ca7.ling for a ;� certain �attern of development because of prior city approvala on sur- �,:' rounding proper�y. Moez� and Funk had questions about the development of the other hal� of Garden Park P].ace adjacent to the undeveloped Wirth proper�y, responded to by Howard. COMMTSSION DI�O� USSIQN AND AC'PION: Bonn felt tMe conditi.ons applicabl.e at the time of the pre�vious hearing on this parcel have not mater�.ally changed. Moen reported talking with some of the neighbors� who appeared tU F)�ppSe the duplex or sin�lo family attachede but who seemed not to oppose sin�J.e family detached even on sma].ler lots. b'unk had aao problezns with the request, stating he �hinlcs ttxe area shows compromise� and he is �ympathotic to the econamic aspect. Owens had v3.s�.ted the psoperty j and x�,ther agreed w�.th staff, but felt �he applicant had present@d an �; excellent case for his requeat;. The other commisaioners agreed with the appl�.c ant. Funk MOVED approval. of Variaz�ce V 1�-F�1 on the findin� by the comaris- sior� �that the conditions for the roquested variance are met i� thia case, and acaordingly that the Heidi Park Subdivi.sion consist of seven lots as "' requested by the applicant; ar►d that the eleven co�ditiaazs racomm�nded by staff apply. 7'he motion was seconded by Helmer ar�d carried seven ta onv, with Bonn voting no. , r� � t1 � �,� f i, ;I I �C .. .. . . . . . . . . . . � � � . .. � . � . ' � _ . ;: i,�' I; M INiT TES i TIGARD PLI�TNING COMMISSION MaY 5, �981. P�age 3, 5•z S17BDZVISTON S 3-81 (CQLUNY CREEK PAASE TT & III) NPO �#3 A revaew of Phase II and TII on thie pxo�ect. Wash. r,ounty Tax Map 251 12 BB, Lots loo, 3y.00, 3600, y.3oo. Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMEND!l�TONB, to�ether with a lettar from Zi�an �roperties requesting an additional Zot No. y.0, indicated on tho Phase II and IZI preliminary plat as Traet '�A". zt would have I�, acaess to a cul-de-sac off Fannn Creek Drive, and while fronting Ha�l Boulevard, would have no aacess to that street. Howard illustrated the features of the development on �he map on the Wall. The APPZTCANT'S PRESFNTATION w�as made b� Dave Evans of Dav3d Evans and .pssoaiates Inc., �00 SW Market �5tx�eet, Portland. He bra.efly descra.bed �he changes made in the ori�inal presentation, whict� was approved more �han two years a�o. In Phase IT they ask for y.0 units versus ,38 originally. Allowed density ie 60 to 62 units, Fie discusBed the bus turnou� in relation to the present temporary access for Phase I. He felt tl�e latter location is the better location for the bus �urnout. Staff had no problems wi�h �h�s relocation when the �emporary access i.s cJ.osed. PU}3�TC T�STTMONY was presented by the following: #** Jerry Cash, 15170 SW �unrise Lane, who is the own.er of property adjoining the southeast cul-de-sac in Phas� III. He had been pramised access in 19?8 by the thon ow'ners when the property was developed. This F pra�iise rvas not reduced to writin�. Mr. Ca�h s�ated the present develogers wi.11 give him access to the cul-deAsaE for a pxice whiah he feels is unreasonable. Funk asked hovr the �j17.,000 figure asked by th.e developer was asrived at. Steve B�.eek of 2201. NE Cornell Road, kIillsboxoo stated it was the engineex�s estima�e of total developmont coet for the project divided by the number of units, which came to �Z0,999• It wae loft �hat this is a matter to be woz�ked out between Mr. Cash and the developer. I *** Leroy Sloan, a resident o� Phase I, w.ho expressed cancern about �I lowex-cost homes being built in the neighborhoode *** Michael F3ridgea, 8500 SW Colony Creek Court, questa.oned the eventual di.sposition oF t.he cu1.-de-sac used a5 the temp�rary access to �II Col,ony Creek, expressing concern for rapid access to t.he development by emer ena vehicles. Howard su ;I B y ggested that an addition to Cond�.tion 3 with respect to the bus shelter provide tha� an adequate fire protection 1ane shall be prova.ded w,hen �he bus sY�elter is moved to t.he sealed�off cul-de-sac now used as the temporary entrance ta t.he Colony Creek develop- � ment. *�� '.Pom Chow, 798� S11CI'anno Creek Drive, expressed concarn over the � subatandard wa.dth of Fanno Creek Drive, feeling it is a safety hazard, � i.' especially for children in the communi�y. Horrard re�orted the city is ;?, i�:i r:, :� t;; t; �;;� 1- �'` j:-`,. i2�`.. _ ,, ;I ',� i,i � `��:i MINIJTF,S TIGARD PI,ANN'tNG COMMISSIQN � MaY 5y 1981 ; Page 1�. aarare of the problem, and tha� no park3.ng wi11 be allowed on either si.de ' o�' the straet. Howard explained t'he history, whieh included conai.deratian of �he problem by the city council, which 3.n this case clid not mandate correction. CROSS-EXAM�NA�TON AND ktEBUTTAL: Mr. Evaris responded to aome of the aoncerne expressed. � CO�iMISSION DISCUSSION AND AC�ION: Funk questioned the 25 for�� private drive in Phase II. Howard explained some of the factars whi.ch had been consi.dered e�rlier� in thi� devel.opm.ent o Funk ob j ected to the compromis�.n� of standards which he sees reflected in this development. Bonn expressed thQ same conaern, especial.ly wa.th the townhouse area. Staff .rsported the fira marshal7. approved this plan. Evans rqsponded that this was basically wha� had px�ev�iously been approved, with some realignment of the pub].ic streets as requested by the public works director. Moen expressed concerz� far the narrow streets and drives. Howard reported he, the publlc wcrks' director and the fire marshal.l were going to work on a revissd standarcl fox streets in planned developments, to be reviewed by the commission and then passed on to t.he council for adoption. He characterized narrower streets in develo�,men� as "the coming thing". Moen expressed coz�cern for acaess by omer�ancy vehicles if any parking accurs on the 25 foot street. Evans detailed what a'Gher nearby �ixri.sdictions have approved in �he way f` of narrovrer stredts. Boran advocated wider streets. Owex�.s raised the � qu�stion of retention of the large trees, many of which �vans reported are � in �h,e open �pace and will not be removed. 4 � Mosn expressed concern fox° the densi�y in Phafie III. He and �vans discussed the open space. Helmer felt �he 25 foo�t private dr3.ve should be in.creased to 3Q feet to assure acceas by emergency vehicles at all time�. Owens �ug�ested a wider pavement cauld give a percept3.on of more space bel;we�ri tho �wa �ows af housea. I'unk felt any mation shoiz7.d inc].ude ; a provision for access to Mr. Cash�s property as a oondi�ion. ' i �3onn MOV�D appxoval of Subdivieion S 3-81� Oolony Creek .Phases II and TII, based on staff find3:ngs and xecommendations, w�.�h provis�.ons the bus � sheltor and turnaut he moved to the temporary access location when �hat becornes a cul-de-sac; that provision be made at this locatian for, emergency vehicl.e accoss; that adequate access be provided �o Mx. Cash�s 1ot, W�.th ae��iis to be work�r�. out by the parties; that the private drive i:n Phase II 'be increased from 25 feet to 30 fe�� i.n width; `and tha� the two cu�.-de-sacs in the area of the houses be 50 feet instead af I�0 feet tivido. Owens secanded tho motion, which carried unanimously. 5.3 COMPREH�:NSIVE PLAN REVTSION CPR 6-81 (B(7NTT.A P,AR�{/CHATTERLEY) NPO #5 A requ�et aFor a Comprehensive Plan Revision from R-7 "'Single Family Residential, 7,500 sq. ft. per lot�� to R-5 ; � s MINUTES ' A TTGARD YLA]VI�TTNG C�MMTSSTON ;, �a� 5, i98i Page 5. 10Single Fami�.y Residential. 5,000 sq. ft o per lot" on 1,8 acres to constrttct :four (4) attachcd single fam3.�.� units and two (2) detached single family units. Wash. County Z'ax Map 2ST. 12B Lot �.a00. Howard read the ST,AF�' REPQRT and RECOMMENDATIONS. He read into �he record a letter from Mr. and Mrs. W. Sykes, who enuwerated reasons wY�y th�y approved Mr. Chatterley's approacla r�n,d hopec�l to buy in�o hi.s projecto Howard stated the commission should set the de-nsity; that he and the public works director had carefully gon� over the 79th-Bonita iz�tersection, and this was the best arrangement possible considering the constraiz�ts due to prior deve].opment. The president asked for and secured a motion to raise the matter from the table. The mota.on was secondsd an.d carried. 'Phe APPLIC.ANT�� PI2ESENT;�TION wae made by Jim Chatterley� 299io SW I,�dd Hi11 Road, Shexvtaod. He stated their feeling was tha� smaller attached homes with solar t'eatu�er wt�uld make for more e�ficient housing and a successful project. PUBLIC TFSTIMONY was presented by -- *** Mrs. Gilmare, 1463o SW 79th, who inquired what of her property would be taken (for Bonit�, Road} . Staff explain�d nothixig would be taken from her property until she developed. She expl��ned the visual impedi- ; ments due �o the vertical curves in B�nita, whicY� she felt is hazardaus to tho unwary. She expresAed hope that the setb�acks, pax�ticularly on BoniGa, would be su�ficient to provide safe pedestr�an uss. Howard exp].�,ir��d the �ros�ect of an LIA in the area as the manner in which the a,mprovemen�s sh.e percea.ves as needed w3.11 came. �#* Chris Vanderwoad, 14345 sw 8oth �'laae, representing Waver�.y Nlsadaws Fiomeowner� Associati,on, who expresssd appositi.on to the mult3.- family nature of the project. Their association would prefer single �ami7.y residences in order to protect the integrity of �he neighborhaod. *** Bi].1 Sykes, wlaose le�ter was read previ.ously, agai.n expressed approval of the concept of the project, and is lookin� fo�ward to moving i.i�to i.t. �** Rita C.hat�erley, co-qwner with the app�.ic�nt, who secal,led thQ oppasition of the Waverly M�adows people to renters` at the 7.ast meeting. She related the sha�bles the propex�ty was in when they bought it from the owner-resident, yet apparantly no one had complained. The poin� was that hame ownershi� does not necessarily mean good care for a prope�ty. �** Mrs. James Weaver, �.�.67o sw 79tn, who agr,esd the pxoperty was in poor coz�d3.tion. She opposed attached dwellings on..the pr��tise that peaple in detached homes are more permanent, **� Bruce Hoskins, a resident of Ti$ard and a landl.ord, who pra9,sed the quality of �his project. ;' i': E' �' r2zrruTEs `PZGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSZON May 5, 1981 Page 6. CRQSS-EXAMTNATTON AND 'REBUT�'AL: Chatterley stated an error of ].0 feet in tGhe al��nment of Bonita wam found, and he is dedicating an add�- tional 10 fPet, so he i� cont;ributing 20 feet xight-of-way to improve Bonita, together wii>h '10 i'eet alon� ?9th. Owens asked about the troes whicY� have been cu�. He reported naany of the large anes were diseased� and that in order to obtain the maximum benefit from so7.ar� only the trees on the perimater were lef�t. Speaker inquired xhat maintenance the park shown on his plan wo�ld receive. Chatterley thought A homeowners associ- at3.on coul.d be �ormed, but it is not provided for i.n his proposal. I��rron inquixed what prov3.s3.ons can be made for a homoowners association, responded to by fiowaa�d. �MMISSTON AISCUSSION 1�.ND ACTION: Moen wondered if �he maintanance on �he common park waixld not become a �roblem, and whether it might be preferable to spread the square footage of the park among the un3.ts to giee slightly larger yards. Bonn felt �he concerns ex�reased at the previous meeting had been properly addressed� and that the plan as pre- sentad is a good one. Owens felt that the density is quite acceptabl� on thie rather small site. Helmex• agresd with the density as proposed� but expressed cozacern over maintenance o�' the common park� feel,ing it should be e1im3.nated. KolJ.eas and Her�ron agreed to the d�naity but felt the maintenance of the park would be a prob'lem. Fun.k MOVEll approva7. of CPR 6-81 based on staff findin�s and recom- menda�ione, w9.th the provision that Reaomraendation 12 specify the non- ramonstrance agreement is for the improvem�nt of 2�onita Road. J3onn favosed giva.ng the developer the op�ion to keep the park, but with some form nf' hatueovrners as�oci,a�Gion to provide prr�per maintenance, or �o eliminate the park and .sedi.st.r�.bute tho 10 units nn the parcel. After a little discussion, Funk added the opti.on to the applicant as part of k�is moti.on. Herron seconded tho motion, whieh carried U2]&IllIq01181y. The president declared a five-minute recessv 5•4 GOMF'REHENSIV�; PLAN R�,'VISION CPR $ & 9-81 (MATN STREET/ J B BI$Hf1P) NPO #1 A request ta change �he Compreheneive Plan Designation for approxiarately four (y.) acres on Aah Street fram A-12 ��Mttlt�.-Family�� to C-3M �+Main Street Commercia'1"; and a �equest for a Prelimina.�y Planned Unit Development for approximately sixteen (15) acres between SW Main and Ash Avenue. Ho�vard a^ead the STAFF REPORT and REC01�9rIENDATIONS. He also read into the record several c�rav�unication�: "'*� A letter �rom Anita Edin� 13110 SW Ash Drive� expressin� great satisfaction with present conditians on Ash Avenue� re�ecting what she MTNUTFS TIGARD k'LANNTNG COA�IMISSION MaY 5 a �-981 Page 7. i e, . 1 �ermed the gift of services as being unwanted by the res�.dents� and expre�sed unwillingne,s to aGcommoda'Ce,.�eople outside her nei�hborhood by having the street improved or extended in an.y way. *** A portion of the minutes of the park board mee-ting af Apxil 23 stating it was the aonsensus of the buard '�to recommend stayizig with the ORB plan.'� It was noted that �the proposal submitted by Main Street Develapment would substantially diminish the size of the ark and � P � encroaches ar� the 100 year flood plain. *�'• A letter from Joseph D. Jebbia, a member of NT'Q ��1, � business- man and a resident at 13505 SW 110th. He stated the traffic concerns haae not really been addressed; that the reduetion of poten�ial residential development sites is not offset by trade-o�fs o� improved traffic flow or anything else; that encroachment i,n the flood plain �'is maet unfortu- nate��; that it is a qusstion whether the city�s need is greater for more commercia�.-re�ail space or residentia7. s.pace; tha.t only a modest percentage of tha proposed retaiJ. spaae is .for small businesses; that a l.asge traffic-generating aevolopment at that intearsection would "produce unde- �+irable con.gestion and patterns,i' and �h�,t the traffic analysis, in his opinion, was 1°an understatement and an ovQrsimplification of the impact on Main Street and 9gVJ'�� *** A portian of �he minutes of PiPQ #�l°s meeti.ng of April ].5 indica�ing approval of a policy statement� also read� which (a) supparts ��the concept of a major shopping area deveJopment nt the south end of Main Street" and the compxehensive plan change from A-12 to C-3M PD for thQ four ac�es involv�d; (b) suggesting that vrith development, "the con- naction of Iiill Street to 0°Mara should be assured��; (c) recoiqmends that hi:gh priority be given to the protection of the oaresi.dential char�cter" of the �sh A.venue ne�,ghborhood, and (d) r�commen.din� tq the planning eom- mi3sion and counci�, the deletion of NPO �1 P1an Po].ic� #28 relatin� to the exi:ension �f Ash AvenuQ acrosr� Fanr.o Cresk. *** A '�position statament on the Ash Avenue exten.sion�' dated April ].5 from Jeff C. Graham and Phil Edin, residents of SW Ash Drive. �his was addressad to th� mombers of NPO /�1 and opposes any extonsion of Johnson Street to Ash which would permit vehicul.ar traffic, expressing the "adamant . . . conviation that such an extension would result in the � rua.n�.ng of an established residentia�. neighborhood.�� ' *** k minority report to NFq �#1 dated April 15 by Kris McBath opposing tha ctaan�e from A-12 to C-3M T'D, point3.ng out (1) mu�.tifamily u�its is an appropriate bixffex to an exietin�, residential neighbo�hoad; (2) such a plan change ��wi11 result in the extens3.on of Ash Avenue"; (3) the pro�ect would have "an enormous impact on alreadq highly utili.zQd stxee�s�'. It admonished vefiy careful planning. *** A letter dated April 27 to the Tigard e3�y aouncil from Gene Richman on bohal.f of NPD #1 transmittin� a request lay the NPO far a comprehensive plan revision �}to delete Policy ,�2$ of NPt7 #1 Plan for ;`:'. , ;;I . �. , MINUTES `�IGARD PLANNING COMMISSIUN May 5, 198� Page 8 Aowntown Ash Avenue.o� He reques�ed the council waive the ��QO fee, and that the i�em be schedu�e� for the May 5 planning commission agenda. ! The APPI,ICAN�P°S PR�"'�' TAT.ION xras initia�ted by Stephen J'anik, att�rney, 900 SW Fifth A,ve. , P�rtland. He opened with a requsst for clarification I of Y�ow the matter of applicant�s .rasponse to tha city�s traffic report, � recea.ved by them on].y 3� hours before i:he meetin.� bagan, should be handled. He fe1� it would be in oxder ta hear �he city+s traffic study first so a suitable response can bP made. The president suggestod some af the other issues might bo taken care of First, i.ncluding the Ash Avenue s3.tuati.on, sa.nce thi� appeared to be ths main in�erest a� many 3.n the audience. Fie inquired of staff how ttle city�s traffic study rPlated to Ash Avenue. �Iow�rd then gave the hi�tory of the study, foll.owad by �he su�gestion the commission grant the comprehensive plan revision on the Benson property and i;he motel property� and then. grant planned unit devolopment status for C-3M development for tl�e svhole 16-acre site, 5ince the land uses are appropriate and this is not an issue. I�Iaving done that, hP suggested talkin� about traffic, b�cau�� he felt the Ash Avenue topic required a join� ma�tir�g betvreen the comraissican and the council to reaolve this "hot'� is�ue. The sensitive lands issue needs to be worked out by the appZic�nt and the park board, and can be handled at the next meetin� at the pre7.iminary xevier� or pre�.iminary and gerieral revi.ewo a.f everything goes well at the staff l:evel. He felt the traffic issue ahould be handl.ed ; at tk�s next moeting aleo because of the lack of time the applicant has �; h�d �to revi.ew the city�s t�affic study. Jaz�ik felt the above suggestions wQre good, and asked to continue with their prepared presenta�iar►, wi�h �he tra�fic issue ta be re�nlved at the next meeting. Speaker felt a decision on Ash Avenue--�rhi,ch would necessara,ly have to c�me from the city councYl--�would have to ba mada bofore he could vote on the proposal. Funk disa�xead, offering tbo suggestian that Ash Avenue be barricaded at Hill u�reet, thoreby al].owing ; full circulation an an exte�dad Johnson Street and across Fanno Creek on an exi;ended Ash Avenue without routing any tra�fic through t�e resider�tial � neighborhaod. There followed discussion �n how and when the various � issue$ would be handled. Janik opined thex�e are tvro Ash Avenue �.ssues: whether it ehould be e�tended across k'anna Creek, and whether Johnson Street should be extended through the pro�ect to A�h. !Phe firs� he felt is i�nde�endent of arid should be settled without rePerence to this projecta the second does have a bearin� on �t. He then focused on the ��anchor" to Main Stree�� whic.h he sa�.d wouZd promo�e a desirable businesr clima�e for smal7.er shops on Fiain S�reet. He s�ated what is not at issue here is an overall transporta- �iqz� plan for downtown �igard. He felt the ��control o�' the land�' issue �II was irre7.ovant--that before they cat� build they would have to solve that i'II 'y' .'I rtzrru��:s ; TIGAI2D PI,ANNING COMMTSSION May 5� 1g81 Page 9. problem. As touched on buildi�lg coverage and landsc�.piz�g. He stated d�.sa�reement with certai.n sta�ements in the staff report concern9eng public review by NPO �`#1; �he seneitive lands situation; the 7.ease wxth Western Oregan Marine; tlae alleged xefusal by thq applicant to aonsid.er alternate traffic pa�i:erns; and the concerns of the park board. Janik then introduced Stephen Domreis of Boutwelly i�ordon, Beard & Grimes, who illustrated the principal feAtures of the deve�.opment with the aid of transparencies on an overhoad project�r. Wayne Kittleson of CH2M-Hi1:L Northwest� Inc., described the work his firm has done over. a period of ti.me on the traffic problem, which is summar3.zed in the traffic impact analysis submitted in the applicant�s writ`�en materaa7... VVith t.he aid of the overhead p.z�ojector he desaribed and illustrated graphica].ly the traf�ic at various points in the '�w�ret casa'� af�ernoon rus.h hour tim� period. He da.seus�ed the "level. of ser�ice�� at various intersections at present. Then he presented conditians they ca�.culate would prevail. :i.n 1985 with the praject�a impac� on �x°affic at the i.ntersections and with the sa.gnals contompl.ated in the propo�al. �3e offe�ed as a handout a copy of the slides presentod. vave Larson o�' Mackenzie Engineering, Inc.,:��v�th �Yse aid of the overhead prajoci.or, doscra,bod the anticipated exeavation and fill in the �'laodpl.ain, and the impact on the 100 year flood. Their study 3.ndicates no 3.mpact on the carrying capacity of k'anno Creek. Sp�aker ascertained � �ha� the "sug�esti.on�+ that the park acrt�ss the creek �rom the project �j "could benefit from re�rading and excavatian'� was made by th.e publlc v�arks �'i ciirector. Bonn inquired �he ownersh�.p o� that land,, which is nwned by ; the ci�y and about onewthird by a private paxty wi�h whom the appl3.cant is worliing. . Jani.�s sequestec� (1� the traffic studies be se� asa.de until the �I general plan review when, a1.7. have had time to study.alternatives; (2) appr�val of the FD designation and the two comprehensive plan chan.ges. � �he preaident then called #or PUBLIC TESTIMQNY:13.mited toepposita.on � of �the aommissiones consideration of the three i�ems ment3.oned earla:er @ by �t�f'f for ac�ion at�this meeting. Phil Edin,°�i317.0 SW Asti Drive, d objec�ed that �he traffic study presented by CH2M�Hi'l1 indicated a connec- � �inn betwee� Ash Avenue and the pro�ect. He related that to the oompre- j hensive plan revision of the Benson property. Bo�h Blount, attorney I repressnting sorae o� tho Ash Avenue residents, stated tlaese peopl.e' ' should be rep•resen�ed in s�aff ineetirigs with the developer. Howard stated the t�.me for them �to paxticipate in such discussic�ns would bp at t'�e ;joa,nt commiss�.on�council meeting, which would be an advertised pub�:�e meeting. Gene Richraan s�ated it rra� 1��.� und��stand�.ng the city� council had placsd the deleta:on of NPq #1 Pol�.Qy �`28 on the �lann�.�zg commiss�.on agenda. Discussion of timing indicated the probability of a meeting +; . ' .� s i f ;, ; MINiJTES TIGARD PLANNINC� COMI��TS"wTON a MaY 5� 7.981 Page 10. after the June 2 meeting o� t;lxe preli�inar�-general plan review for t'h:is project, a�ter the joint mec�t��ng with the city counca.l on Ash APenue. There be3.ng no further testimony on the three ra�her limited actions proposed #'qr �his meeting, th� prs�ident c�.osed the public hearinh. COMMISSTON DTSCUSS�ON AND ACTT�N: After some discusfiion r�s to precisely what rv�s being voted on, Bonn MOVED approval of (1) Compreheneive Plan Rev3.sion Cl'R 8-81, A-�.2 to C-3M (Benscin property on Ash Avenuej; {2) Compre.hensive Plan Revision CPR 9-$1, C��j to C-3M (Valenci.a Mana� ' . Mote1. �ro�erty); (3) Planned t}n3.� Development design�a�ion, ZCPD �-81 for C-3ri �� a�ve�.o�m�nt oa� the antire approximate�y 16-aare tract; and (4? �.pproval of C�3M Zone uses in the planned develo�ment. The motion a�as seconded by Funk. In further discussian, �S��,mer made it Very c].ear that t.here is no implj.ed approval. for conf�,gura�i.on af the buildings, use of flaad plain, �ranspoxtation ,patte�n, etc. , and that these must be warl�ed ou� wit.h staff before �hey roturn ta us for pre��minaxy or preliminary-and��ener.al pl.an review. (He asxd F'unk favored two addi- �ionaT iaearings.) Speaker summarized Wha� ap�ea�ed ko be the consex�sus� th�at the applicant raauld resnlve the coneerzzs expressed in the sta�f report �r� the sata.sfaction o� st�ff� whereupon he waul.d re�urn for either a pre�.im3,nary rev3.e�r, or a pre7.iminary and general plan review, if staff f�lt this to be in order. Helmerr sti11 felt �Wo hearings should be hel,d. Thd motion theh ca.rried unanimous�.y. How.ard autlined the steps yet involved: joint public hearing on A.s.h Ayex��e wa.th the commissian and the caunci7.; resolution at the staff 1:eve1. of the several pUints yet unr��olvecl; then, either one or, two morQ mee�ings befare the coTnmission, depend3.ng on the abi.li�y i;n resolve probleans at t:he s�aff lPVel,» He est�mat�d thi.s cou�.d be dane at a specia7� meeting toward �he end of June or early in July. 0�'I�ER BUSIN�SS: Speaker inqui�ed about the propriety of ths van frequently parked at the intersec�ion o� Hal�. and Durham Hoad bear�.ng a �.arge sign adverti�ing a forei�tit car shop. FIe aslzed if th3,� wa� the same outfit that came tn us for � eonditianal use, at wiaich t�.me �.t wms mada el�ar �ha� na advertising would be parm�.tted o,ff his site. FIoward stated .he �,s working on it, together with th� penny arcade mat�ter in Ti�ard Plaza. The president ad�ourned the meeting at 11:55. ?� ...::..v� -M:�,,.�i. ,.......�.�.... .,......:.__......._.. .....,..,... ..� ._..�:...:..., ,.. ... � . � . ... . ........,. ... ...�.,......��..N.h....... .. • • ., , _ � t• , . ... . ..... .._. ..»... . . . . ..... .....,�_._ ...._..............,...._.�... ,,.�......,.�... � t r :i k � . y. "'� "PI.ANNING COMMI5SION SIGN-UP SHEET" �t � � . �. . ,.-: - . , ;:,; NQTICE: 1�L PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND N�TE THEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGEI�]DA ITEM: �� ACT�OiQ REFERENCE: ��_` � � �! �� + ; NA"l�E� ,� /� ADD:2E5S `'f,,,�l� jq'GGC.le!'�Z-t!��i �/"f�d J`�t�� t�t/�'jp� ��''F''� u � 3/.t v ,s�J �q„s �� p✓� . ' P�-1 �d� � �3 i/v s �� R-s�f- �R�v� Tr �.� ,c� � �luc c�x h � �sl¢ �ti t „ J'��F �s-r�a��.� ��-s'/f D vr v� 7~c i�� Ig e� �l o u.,t j'`' a�!3 7 /a.c�et�_.4 ut. Fa+�t S 7' �i-+r�v�t. �'1�//,G _ _-._�,�.�_1�c1�z��d'.t.4, i �� U s k� c��R�h!r� �-r- , . --�--__r__ f AG��tDA ITEM: `�� ACTION REFERErTCE: N� ADDRESS . . _ � �`J` 'L I 3� I� ��1 /�i s'd, "r I �A21� _-,-�`� . :� � �,,, . kc:►kt4� � C•�Il�:� �� _ L�a,IC�� «-�,.��-. � . � , , AGENDA ITEM: ACTION REFERENCE: ' N13NIE p,DDRESS ' . , ; I � �`,,e . . , : ._,... ..... . _ ..._.. ..,. .�.�_....._.. .. . , . ._. ...,..__..�_,.......�.. :�..�..... . . .. �. ;I , , _ . t .�.: . . . .. ... , __:..�w. .�.. ..,... l , R ,. � . . . . . . ._ ... . . . r..i �II ' (i i . (�y i i'I '' G' ` "PLANNING CObu2TSSIQN SIGN-UP SHEET" ' �' '' � ' • . ' � NOTICE: ALL PER50N5 DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY TTEIK MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND � I> ... NOTE TF�IR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. . � AGENDA ITEM: •� ACT�ON REFE.RENCE: �d,�f�,�((fZ/ �f�-"g� �� J� �=^'� ADDRES S i �� / ,�G�-c��' �- ��/P �¢ a� �7�,� ':'; , / ; . � AGENDA ITEM: , , �% ACTION REFEREIVCE: �_V�'� I VI� I(M S ��C �,� --�CY�#'1�.._ �r�� ' � i � /'� ADD�2ESS i 'w �,. �, j C�� -j �'. '''�/_L��/ �7t�, / . i ��Z I � � � ��..�''..��.�c � �Z ; i ��..... �'�00 S!�J C D,.,,.� �Le,�. C�`- 5'7 Z�-� . c �-ySv -� �- �. � � . ds' � � � � ' � � � ' � , , . � �'6� v � �� . �, c� � , . � �' . ��_ 5 �9�i(�� T �1 °17�� AGENDA ITEM:_ '��, � ACTIOI3 REFERENCE: ��g, � �p � g� t � NAME ADDRESS ' �/ '""� �O W ' '� � . _� � -2r.�� /.�_7 U �� . s � , � �.�( ��Gr,�� ._ � � 5w 71� � � .: __ _ _. __ _. __ _ i1 _.�...,�,..,�.,:w,...�.M._..,.........,.,__. .. _..... , , �... . ..--_ __ ..,._.. ,. . ..,_. _...._ . ...�, .._., . . . . .. _........ .w _..,-._.w .. ....... ..... ..� .w ... _ ,�...'� . ' .. � � . �, �$� � "PLANtVING COM2�ITSSTON SIGN-iJF' SHEET" j' � . . x ��{. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DES2RING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUS�' SIGN THEIR NANIE 13ND � NOTE �IR ADDRE5S OIJ THIS SHEET. � AGENDA TTEM: `� • � ACT�ON REFERENCE: � + G ...� � N:�.r'4E ADDP,ES S �u'�i --. .2,20/ �%, l��r�G �� - ��S�..x��v � • �;� � z � � � � � � -�� AGENDA ITEM:� ACTI�N REE'ERENGE: _ DT,AME ADD,RE S S .: �- . • �. ' • . � � � i � i � ' � � i AGENDA YTEM; ACTION REFERENCE: ' NAME ADDRESS �, �� - : : . _ _ _ . . . _ _. _ _� _ . _ . ,; , � :� STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.7. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Mp,y 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. F�JWLER JUNIOR HIGH - Lecture Room ',� 10865 SW Walnut Streei:, Tigard k id NO SUBMISSION OF ADDIT2ONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE � PUBLIC HEARIt�G TJIQLESS THE APi'LICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THI5 r OCCUR, ��Q�S�D/ THE TTEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HEARING. f: i DOCKET: VA,FtI�NCE V 4-.81 NPO # 3 Ed Gause on 110�.h and Garden P��rk Place Heidi:. Park Su�division ;. i Z�PPLIGANT: Ed �ause " 14635 SW' 133 f`. Tiaard, OR 97223 s: OWNER• Same REQUEST: A request for a variance from minimum lot standards x o�' seVenty five huric�red ('7,500} square feet in an �`' R-7 °�Single Family Resiflential" zone. s t 1. SIDTE LOC�TION: SW' ll�th and �arden Park Place r Was•hington County Tax 1�lap 2S1 3DD Lot 1301 �' �{ PREVIOUS ACTION: Re�erence: CU 4-�79 � On 1�ar•ch 6, 1979 the Planning Commission approved "y`-, a Conc�iti,onal Use for Mr. Gause �o allow construction }' o�' one (.1) dupl.ex ar�d four (4) single family homes !�4' �' an ]..45 acre s, � r; i= On April 3, 1979, the Planning Commission �pproved a � zone change from R-10 - "5ingle Family Residential" to �`' �i R°7 "Single Fami.ly 2Zesidential". }; ;! i: Referend.e: ZC 8-79 and Ordinance 79-32 of Apri1 23, 1979. �; A Preliminary Subdivis3on Plat was approved on ;' ?�pril 16, 1979 to allow four (4) single family lots ;:� �nd one (1) duplex. ` ' �; Refe.r�nce: v 7�-79 s� �, ' Th%s �ariance allowed the standards of a local street �� to be xeduced to znatch Garden Park Place. �" Eii I. FINDINGS Ok' F?�CT �'? E> /�� The Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.76.020 states that; �i t �� , �: , ;�� F� STAFF REPORT AGENDA NU. 5.1 TIGARD YLANNING COMMISSION MA.Y 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FUWLER JUNTOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Page 2 18.76.20 Granting -- Conditions. No variance shall be granted by the Planning Commission unless it can be shown that all of the following conditions exist: (1) Exceptional or e�,raordinary conditions applying to the property that do not apply generally to otlier properties in the same zone or vicinity, which conditions are a-�.result of lot size or shape, topography, ar other circumstances over whi:ch the applicant has no control; (2) Th� variance is necessary for the preservation of a property right o� the applicant substantiallX the same as is possesse8 by owners of other property in the same zone or viainity; (3) The authora:zati,on o,f the variance shall nut be materially detrimental to the purposes of thi,s title, be injurious to pro�erty in the zone or vicinity in whs.ch the property is located, or be otherwise detrimental to the o?�jectives o� any �ity development plan or policy; (4) The �ariance rec�uested is the minimum variance from the provisions and standards of this ti:tle which wi11 alleviate tille hardship. (Ord. 70-32 S 24Q-2, 1970) 2) Parcel is zoned R.-7 "Single Fami,ly Residential" -- Minimum lot size is 7,500 squaxe feet. 3) Garden Park Place to 110th is uni�nproved. 110t1i Street is sub- s.t�,nd�rda abu�tting this proposed subdivision, and will be brought to lacal street standards with this de`relopment, 4) Surrounding land uses include single tamily to the north, duplexes to the east and south, single family to the wes•t across 110th. 5) Public services are available to this site. 6), Garden Paxk Place is narrow. P_pplicant has been granted variance to al.�gn his proposed street section with that which already exists. Sta�,� Cozrtnlent: � 7.'he applicant �;s requesting a var3ance to the minimum lot size in a R-7 zone. i Four (:4) Zots are apprpx%ma,tely 6,368 sguare feet each, two (2) lots are � 7,428 square feet 'each, and one (:1) lot upon wh3ch a house rests in 8,395 ', square ,�eet. 'I'h�s house was moved onto tY►e lot. No �access was allowed off �_ .._ _ ___ — - -- - . _ , , . i STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.1 TIGARD PLANIQING COMMI5SION MAY 5, 19fi1 — 7:30 p.mo FOWLEI2 JUNIOR HTGH ° LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Page 3 off Garden Park Place due to tlie fact that the public street improvements wPre never completed. It seems appropriate to Staff that the 7,500 square feet lot sizes be honored in this case for tlie lots to the North. If this were done, only three (3) lots would be allowed of 8,489 square feet each. The variance to the two (2) southern lots is minor and should be granted. Remember that h d the local street been built to stan dards the s uare a , 2 foatac�e that the applican.t is squeezing into one additional small lot would have been used in street donstruction. Anothe r issue is the Wirth pro�erty to the south. Mr. Wirth received II agproval for two (2) duplexes on his parcel but never could find the funds to build, `1'his means that we w:i11 not have a full street improvement for approximately 100 �eet on the south of �arden Park Place. �'� If the Planninc� Commission agrees w•ith Staff, we would eventually have }� � ,` 6 si le i h t" b i six O ng fam ly omes zn his su d vi.sion: f � :1 ' One existing house on 8,395 squaxe fo�t lot i; t ch o 7 428 e foot lots Two single. family d� a ed n , squar Thx�ee single fanti;ly deta,aS�ed on 8,489 square �oot lots ;,, TI:: CONCLUSIONARY FTNDIN�S �'`�' � 1� The applicant cannot meet the requirements for a variance as outlined !i aboye. ;,; :; III. STAFF REC01"lMEND,�TION =� r: l' Stat�f recommends denial of this �yariance request for all lots except the i` two (2) 7,428 square �oot lots. ;�i �: 5taff recommends approval of Heidi Park Subdivision �to consi�t of one (1) ` 8,395 square foot lot with an existing house, two (2) single family detached � hous,es on 7,428 square foot lots and three (3) single family detached houses Y, on 8,489 square foot lots. '' �': '1'his plat confic�uration would be subject to the following conditions: �' � 1) 7."he fee ,for a subdi,vision revi.ew shall be paid. A public notification k� to surrownding propexty owner� wi11 be sent out and �taff will re-activate , �a �; _ , STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Page 4 the file as more than one (1) year has elipsed without progress on the si te. 2) Adequate right-of-waybe de dicated on 110th Street to the City ' and necessary half-street 3mprovements be made to the satisfaotion of the Public Works Director. 3) SW Garden Park Place to extend to 110th Street. 4) No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions pL.aced upon this development by the City of Tigarcl have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out be ths app ropriate department. 5) No changes wi11 be made to approved plans or specifications unless fo�al application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are �p,�oyed by th�t departznent. Application for changes will be made in writing and sha11 include a�plic�ble drawings, 6) Grading and construction p3.ans for all work in public rights-of-way and a11 othex public improvements sha11 be prepared by a registere d professional engineer in accordance w�.th Citg standards, and shall be submitted to the Public [+Torks Department for reya;ew. All �ublic impxovements will requ3re a Gompliance Agreernent and. must be (design). approyed by the �ublic Works Department, and must be either (1) �ully and sati,sfactorily c�nstructed prior to the recording of any Building Perntii:ts; or (2) bonded to the Gity for 100 � of the estimated cost thereof �rior to the recording of any mi.nor land partition, public dedication, final pla�, or issua,nce of Building Permits. 7) ,�11 proposed utili,ties shall be placed underground. :>treet ia��gli�ting insta�llations shall be ap�proved by the Public Works Department. 8). A 2qetes and bounds legal descriptian and map shall accompany a de.di;cati,on o,f ,public xights,o�-way, parks, open space or floodplain areas and shall be p,2�epared by� a re�istered engineer or land surveyorer. 9) All street and p�rking �reas shall be concrete or asphalt. A7;1 II sidewalks sh�7,l be concrete. 10) No Building Fermits sha11 be issued until the expiration of the twent�r (2Q) day appeal pexi:od from the date o� approval. STAFF REPORT AGENDA Nn. 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1981 - "I:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIQR HIGH - I�ECTURE ROON! 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard Page 5 11) No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless format application is Tnade to the City of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. � Aldie anning Direator I 'I i --,� _ , __ STAE'F REPOI2T AGENDA NO. 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMI5SION MAY 5, 1981 7;3'0 p.m. � FOWLER JUNIOR FiIGH - I,�CTURE ROONI 10865 SW Walnut Street, 'rigard NO SUBMISSIOII OF ADDITIONAL T�IATERIAL BY APPL'ICANT SHALL BE MAD� AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNT,ESS THE APPLTCANT IS REQUESTEL' TO DO S0. SHOUI�D THIS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WII,L BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLIAWTNG HEARING. DOCKET: Updat,e for COLONY CREEK Estates NPO # 5 Phase II & III APPLTCANT: Ronald Phair � 2201 NE Cornell Hi:llsboro, OEt 97123 OWNER: Same REQUEST: Fox a pre].iminazy and general plan review of a R-7 Planned Unit ]�velopment and Prelimi.nary Plat. Under Section 18.56.150 Major Changes Planned De-velopment of the Tigard 1Kunicipal Code, a •major ch.ange in a c3evelopment (i.e. increase in density over previously approved project) must be treated as a new app].ication before the Planning Cnx�ai.ss3on. � SITE, T�UCATIpN: 5W Ha11 Blvd and SW Fanno Creek Drive Washingtan County Tax Map 2S1 12BB Lot 3400 - (2.08 acres) Lot 36Q0 --� ( .60 acres� Lot lOQ -- (9.69 acres) Lot 4300 -• (1.04 acxes) PREVIOUS ,A,CTTON: On �'ebx�uary 14, 1978, an application for a Zone Change (ZC 2-78) was made for R 7PD on Washington I County Tax 'I�ap 2S`1 12B„ Lot 1000 for 2.20 acres for two s3ngle �amily and twelve duplexes. The Planning Co�mi;ssion on, 2�Iarch 21, 1978, approved the application for a preliminary Planned i�evelopment (See staff report ZC 2�78 for 01'DerHart") � On June 6, 1978, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Counoil that tlle general plan R 7PD fqr ZC 2�78 be approved with conditions. I d STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.2 TIGARD PLANNTIVG COMMISSION MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR IiIGIi - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Page 2 On June 26, 1978, the �i�g�,Counc;iaL app'roved Ordinance No. 78�40 which approved the R 7PD for Tax I'..at 1000. On 'May 12 , 1978, the City received an appZication for a Prelimi:nary �lan R 7PD for Phase II and III of Colony Creek, Washington County Tax Ma.p 2sl 12B Lots 600, 800, 1100 and 1101., See Staff Report ZC 15-78. On June 20, 1978, the Planning Commission reviewed the P;reliminary Plan and approved it with several conditions. On November 7, 1978, ZC 15-78 General Plan R 7PD was brought ta the Planning Commission (reference letter of November 13, 1978 to Der Hart Associates stating Planning Commission approval) . A special meeting was held by the City Council on December 18, 1978 on Ordinance No. 78-83 which was ; held over for a second reading, On January 8, 1979, Ordinance 78-83 wa�; passed by the City Council. '� . �,.� ;;,; March 1981: Property changed hands. New appl�:cation �.I I:� �or R 7PD General Plan Review made for presentation � to Planning Com�ission. No construction has taken °� place on Phase TI or Phase ITI. j Phase I is being constructed now. Phase II is for i�'�'�I R 7PD Single �'amily De�ached - twenty thxee (23) units. �;+! ( Lots 1 -- 22 and lot 39 with avera e lot size of , g i 673Q squa.re feet) "" 4iI i;�1 Single �'a,mily attached , sixteen (16) units. (Lots �'` 23 ^ 40 with a�Yerage 1ot size of 4,126 square fest) �^�' f. Total: 40 Lots. ' I' t ,;: Phase ITI �hows the proposed construction of thirty �'` four (34) townhouse units. 7.'his phase boarders Fanno 1`s' Cxeek to the narth and Waverly Meadows to the east. �'' ��. r: (';. F�NDINGS OF F1�CT: �'.'. �'%;' 1) 12eference Staff Report ZC 15�78 of November 7, 1978 (Exhibit "A") . �:' Property to the east of Qhase ITT h.as been developed as Waverly Me:adows, r including duplexes dixectly abuttin� pxoposed tc�wnhouse units. �:.;, � �� : �: .:, �- _ �; STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMI5SION MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - I,ECTURE ROUM 10865 SW Walnut 5treet, Tigard Page 3 2) Policy 16 of the NPO # 5 Plan specifically addresses urban medium density issues for this area (Exhibit "Bj . 3) Ordinance No 78-83 establishes'. the R 7PD land use designation under the , Compx�hensive Plan. 4) . No provision has been znade for open space within the multifamily areas except for the area along Fanno Creek� 't'his density could support a major impraveznent to the floodplain area for active reareational uses. Applicant sh4uld address th3s issue (Exhibit "C") . 5) Fanno Creek Drive shall be a public street, fifty (50') feet dedicated, with th3,�ty four (:34'') of paving anc� sidewa�ks on bath sides of the street. 6) Tn Phase TII in the znulti.family area, the private driveway s11a11 be conti:nued axound to return to Fanno Creek Drive. No curb returns shall be installed at the two ingress/egress po3nts. A Homeowner's Agreement shall be fi.led with the CitX gu�ranteeing perpetual maintenance of this private street. A parking lot area sha11 be included on the plan where the "pa.anters" at the noxth end o� the d�iveway� are now shown. A written comment sha11 be made a part of this application from the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Fire Marshall (�xhib�,t "7�") . STAFF RECOD'�MENDATION Staff recommends appr�oyal o� �hase TI and ITI for. a general and preliminaxy plan with the �ollow3,ng conditions: 1) Ti�e Open 5pace P:Lan re�erenced in lettex from David Evans and Associa•tes dated 4,9�81 sliall be submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the Townhouses, �'hase TrI. 2) Developer shall proteot and s•ave all exi:st3ng large site trees as practical duxiny construction. 3) A Bus 3helter shall be ,�royided on Hall Blvd. with a bus turnout, A payed walkwa� �h.�.11 be provided East ito �'anno Creek Drive. Plans to be subir�itted to QDOT and Publxc W�rks Director for approval. 4) A written comcnent shall be ma,de a part of this application from the 4.'uala,tin R�xal Fi.re Protection D.istxict �ire Marshall (Exhibit "D") . 5) A nonremonstxance agreement �or the future improvement of Hall Blvd. sha11 b� made a part of the �j,n�l pl�t and becorqe a part of each deed. 6) No OccixpaficX Pe�its, �hall be issued vntil a11 conditions placed upon this; development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections i STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1981, 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR I-TIQi - LECT[JRE ROONi 108h5 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Page 4 verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. 7) No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal applicatian is made ot the appropriat� City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 8) Grading and construction pl.ans for all work in public rights-of-way and all other publi,c improvements sha11 be prepared by a registered professional engineer in acoordance with City standards, and sha11 be submitted to the Public Works Department fqr review. Al1 public iTnprovements wi11 require a Compliance Agxeement and must be (design) approved by� the Public Works Department, and must be either (1) fu11y and staisfactor�.ly� constructed pxior to the recording of any ��nnr land � partiti,on, public ded�cation, final platy. or issuance of ', Building Ferznits; or (:2� bqndEd to the City for 100� of the estimated ' cost thereof .prior to the record�;ng of any minor land partition, public � ded:�cation, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits. 9) A11 pro�osed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 10) A metes and bounds 1ega1 descri,ption and map shall accompany a dedication of public rights�of-way, parks, open space, or flood�alain areas and sha11 be prepared by a registered engx.neer or 1and surveyorer. 11) A Gity o£ Tic�ard a�proved Nonxemonstrance �1,gre�ment must be recorded by Washinqton County and returned to the City of Tigard Planning Department before issuance of Building Permits or cliange of property ownership. 12) All street and parking areas� sha11 be concrete or asphalt. All sidewalks sha11 be concre�e. 13) No Bua,lding �ernl3ts sha11 be issued until the expiration of the twenty day (2Q) apQeal �e;riod ,from the d�te of approval. 14) No minor �1and ,��rtitions sha11 be znade in reference to this pxojsct unless. �ornlal �,�lication is made t� the City of Tigard Planning I7epartment and the �ni:n,ox land partition is approyed and �ecorded. �� e xd P1 �ng D3;xector STAE'F REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHA.LL BE MADE AT T[iE PUBLTC HEARING UNLESS THE APPLTCANT TS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, TI�E TTEM WILL BE TABLED UNTTL TEIE FOLLOWING IiEARITQG. DOCKET; COMPREHENSTVE PLAN REVISION CPR 6-81 NPO # 5 �im Chatterly� Bon3ta Park - Chatterly APPLTCANT: Jizn ChatterlX 29910 SW Ladd Hi11 Rd Sherwood, OR 97140 OWNER: Same REQUE S T: RE°HE.ARING A ,rec�ue�t for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from Ci,ty of Tigard R�7 °Single Fami:ly Residential°' to R-5 "S:i,ngle �'amily Resxdenti:al" on 1.8 acres at the corner of SW 79th T�venue and Bonita Road. � Applicant w�.shes to constx�uct four (4) attached s!i,ngle fami.ly units on the sitP. �' � S�TE LOCAT�QN:, 14575 St�J 79, Tigard, OR 97223 i Wasli�:ngton County Tax Map 2S1 12B Lot 4000 P1.ZE'y�0U5 ACT�ON: PLE,FISE RE;¢3D ATTACHED STP,b'F REPORT �) � i, i , Staff Conuuents: �, At the �pril 7, 1981 Planning Commission meeting this item was tabled, ` The two (:2) �ajox conce�,*ns of the Planning Commission were the alignment I of SW 73th. and the housing znix the applicant had proposed. Staff has � reviewed the pxqFosed al�;gnznent af SW 79th with tfie Public Works Director and the Tualatin Rura1 �F�re Protection District F'ire Marshall. The Public � Works Director feels that the proposed alignment of SW 79th is the j best ane possible c�iv�en tfie constraints presented by existing development ` 'i to the noxth, i I The othe r concern was the proposed housing mix. In reading the minutes I of April 7, 1981, Planning Commission meeting, Staff's interpretation � [ � � ( R t - • � i STAFF REPORT � AGENDA N0. 5.3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMI5STON MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. � FO�WLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Chatterly - Page 2 " ' ; 4 . is that the Plartring Commi.s�:.on saanted a housing mix of single- family and single-;�ami11�attached. 'Itvo of the commissioners offered the applicar��t alternatives to his plan. 7."he applicant has proposed a new• plan which shows all of the units as single-family attached. Althaugh the Tigard Municipal Code allows single-family-attached on 10,000 square teet in a R-5 "Single �'amily Residential" zone, it is 5taff's 3mpression that a �major3ty of the Commi.ssion felt that at least a 50�'SQ single��amily�single,family-attached split would be xnore appro�xY,ate on this particular site. Since the density concerns of the Comm3ssian seein to be site specific (relating to this particular location and neighborhood) Staff asks that the Planning Commissi,on determine tfie fious3ng mix for this site. Appiicable NPO # 5 po1�.c3es are as follaws: ' i POT��G'Y` 7: The single �azni;ly character of the area designated on thP k pl�n znap as Urban Low Density Residential is v3ewed as a positive asset to be xetai:ned. �ro ects � e j proposed tor tliis area znust be judged aaaording to ef�ects uponi this ch,axacter. � FOLfiCJY 8: Wxtfii�n tl�e Urban Low• Density Residential area allow �;i dupl�exeS on, lot� less appropria�e for sixagle �fami�y homes to a.nclude �;; locatinns at street intexsee�trons, adjacent �major thoroughfares, and as buffers between no�-.xesidential and znulti-faznily and single � family� axeas. � �, d: POLxCX` 13: Site �lans tv3,11 provide for adequate open sp.ace to (a) �;', pxptect adjacent pxo�e�t3,es, and (b� provide ample yard space for residents �`' and p�.ax space �or yow�c�stexs, k �, �MT v v� �� , ��e re,d bX E1�;zabeth Newton ow �'' Assi.stant ��anne.;r Planning i ctor �1{; �° �: � I � %t� �,:{ �i:' STA�F REPORT �'I ACTIEL�F, N0. 5.4 TIC�,RD PT.�NNfiNG CONY�IISS�ON N�1Y 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FCi4�,ER JUNIOR HI(�i -LECTURE � ; 10865 SW Wa111ut� Tigard - �: ,, NO SUBNIISSION OF ADDT�'IONAL 1��TERIAL BY 1�PPLTCP,NT SHALL BE NII�11E AT TFIE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS '.PHE APPLTC�NT IS REQUESZED TO DO SO. SHOULD THTS OCCUR, UNREQiJ�STED, T!� T�lE WTI.L BE TABLED UNTIL Tf� FOT�'LC)WING HF..�.2TNC. �I } DOCi�T: 1.) COMP�NSTVE PLAN REVISTON C�R 8-81 �,'', A-12 to C-3M (Benson on 1�sh Street) I ��:�I 2) COMPi�EbIE�ETTSTVE PTAN REVISION CPR 9-81 �,i C-5 to C-3M PD (1�bte1 on 99W) �i i il 3) PF�LTMINARY FI�NNED UN.LT LIEVELQPMENT ZCPD 5-81 � Review for C�3M �D Developm�nt on 1'Zap 2S1 2AC �' Lots; 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 16D0, 2200, 201 & 2301 fl o� approxii�,at.�1y si�:een (16) acres between SM 'Mai,n Street and SW� Ash Avenue (7.bta1 Site Designation) '� APPLICIINT: T�ai.n St�et Develop�azt 3602 Fixst Nati:onal Bank Center k;�l Pox�lancl, OR 97201 (7WNER: S� ` 1�1FPLICATTO�T DATE: Apri 1 10, 19 81 ��i IpCATION Ok' SITEs 2�1a,%n St�e�eet at highway 99W and Johnson Street. � Washi,ngton Cnunty Tax Map 2S1 2AC Ipts 1200, 1300, �� 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 201 and 2301. �;%. �i`' �g I�QUEST: 'I'here are three (3) requests in this application. 'I'he �i,xst is �or a Comprehensi;ve P1an Pevision £or 1i appn�ximately four (4) acres on SW Ash Avenue from '� p�sent A-12 "'Mu7,ti--faQni.ly ?�esidential" to C-3Ni PD "'M�.i.n Street Cone�rcial" (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AC; a portion of 1ot 2301) . �� The sea�nd request is for a Camprnhens�ive Plan Revision E; �ox the current site of the 'Valencia Nbtel, fram C-5 '�'Hi.ghwaX Coc�ar�ercial Zone" to C-3M "Main Street co�rexcia�"' (Waslu.ngton Co�ty Tax A�ap 2S1 2AC Lot 1600) . The third nql.�st i,s for the addition of the Pl:anned Uni,t Dev�elopment (PD) designation to the enti:2� s�,te clue to Sensitive Lands 1�lreas, plus the STAr�' REPORT AC�'NDA N0. 5.4 TIGARD PLAIVNING OONY�ICSSION NY�Y 5, 1981 F�xn1LER JUNIOR HI(�i - :LEC.PURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard Page 2 i � � i fact that this project will have a ma.jor impact ! on the downtr�wn area. Staff feels it �ssary � to subject the developimnt to public review �y NPO # l, !; the Planning Comnission and the City Council. ;I u. 'Itar� additional applications have been filed in oonjunction �I w�.th this develo�ment. One is for a Minor Land Partition (ML�,' 4-81) for the Benson property on Ash Avenue r', (Washington Counc�y Tax Map 2S1 2AC I,ot 2301) . One i� acre to the soutYi would be split-off and developed at �' the A-12 "Ntulti�family Residential" density, 'I'his �; c�ve�opment, Benson'.S, cv�auld also be s'ubjeet to Site � Desi,gn �view at the Staff level. Staff is processing � thi,s a�lication now. � � The last ap,plication is the Sensitive Lands Pezmit � to cut, fi11 and build in the one hundred (100) year � �loodp7,ai;n a7,ong 'k'anna Creek. � � The a�plicant has .�quested that the Sensitive Lands � Permit app7..�.cati,on not be made a part of the Preliminary P�,an k�view, althouc�h the informati.on is included in the �re7,i:minary P1arx narrati.ve. Staff feels that this issue �`s i�oJCtant due to the fact that a buildi�xg �: is proposed in � �7.00dplai.n area, if. the Plann.ing ;, Co�mn.ission approves t�he cut and fi11 p1an. The Park � Board has revi.ewed this situation and has expressed serious ooncerns for th� effected park area. (See attached Park Boa�l Mi.nutes) Note that 11.5� o� the proposed site is within the orbe- hundred year floc�dplain. (Page 9 of �relimin.ary Plan Na�rative dat�d 1�pri1 10, 1981, Preliznin,ary D�eveTopment Plat�) The report does an ac�equate job of describing the e,ffe�ts of intrusion onto the �1ood�lain as far as pro�iiiding for excavation and grading t�o offset oontemplat�ed �i,11. Hawev�r, the effects on the intrusion intA the zero �oot �'7.00dway (that a�nea of imving wat�r) is passed,-off as no� being significant. Nbre i.nforntation on these e��ects is required in orc7,er for Staff and the Conmi,ssion to m-�ke a decision on the technical requirements, not to mention recreational and op�n. space oonsiderations. Please reme�r�ber a11 calculations 5TAFF REPORT AGENDA NO. 5.4 TIC=ARD PT,ANNING CON�'IISSION �,Y 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FYJ6VLER JUN.COR HIQi - LECI'URE ROOA'i 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Pag� 3 are based upon Corps of Engineers clata which is for 1978 existing c�ncition, not future r�unoff. Section 18.56.020 of the Code - Subsection (c) Writt,en Report (4) states: A descripti:on of aT1 sensitive lands r�vithin the development and what e�ffect the developm�nt will have on simi.lar areas off site. In the case of a floodplain or drainag� area, this portion of the narrativ� wi.11 be very specific. The City reserves fihe riglit �.o hire appropriate, prafessianal, consultants to refute any portion o� an applicant°s narrati-c� eoncerning ,floodplain or draina.ge areas. The oost of this consul.tincr Sr�11 � bo�-,e totally by tlle applicant. ' We shoula di sc�.�ss this issue as a part of the Preli.minary Plan Review. The �sh Street e�ens�.on question has been avoided by the applicant. � # 1 �rtbex, Mr. Gene Richman, su}�rr�i:tted a request to the City Council on Apxi1, 27, 1981, to rn-desigriate Z�sh �ree�. What is being suggested is the x�roval, a� Folicy 28 in the NPO # 1 �1an concerning Ash Street across Fanno Creek to SW Burnfiam. P�EVIOUS ACTION: Reference: SDR 1-80 and ZGPD 6-50 � Staff Report on April 22, 1980 On June 3, 1980, the Planning Co�mission zninutes reflect the following: "F`iank 7rpved approval o� the Zone. Change ZCPD 6-80 based on the land uses contes�lated by the applicant, and with the several canoerns outlined ir� the Staff M�mo (of J�ine 3, 1980) from the Planning Di,rector to the Pl,anning Commission, Subject: Preliminary ZCPD 6-80, Main Street I�velopment (GT Joe's) as proper items for discussion and resolution bet�n Sta�� and applicant. The m�tion was seconded by Bonn and carried unanimously". (See e�iLit "A" and exhibit "B", June 3, 1980 M�mp) k'ollowin� this meeting be�ore the Plannin� Co¢�mission the Main Street ; Devel,o�zner�t c,�ou,� rar� into c�i;i,£ficulti,es. No General Planned Unit ' Devel,opment pzr,posal was submitted for revie�w. Then a new group was ' fozmed, pro�erty was added, and a ne�nrc�velopment plan was prepared. � , . , . . S"rAP�' 17EPOl�i' AGENDO NO. 5.4 TIC-ARD PLANNTNG CON�ZLSSION I�Y 5, 1981 - 7:30 p�m. FCxn7LER JUNIOR HIC�i - LECTURE 1d�OM 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard Page 4 Note from the June 3, 1980, Me�norandtun that Staff had several major concerns which had to be addressed; Traffic circulation, control of all lands proposed for dev�lopment, flcxx3plain issue, and DEQ requirements for Indirect Source Permit. Referenoe ZOA 7-$0, file which createci a revised Planned Development District (PD) Chapter 18.56.015 states: "... The initial applicati�n sha11 be co�lete in all respects as outlined in the following text or as suggested by the Planning Staff. An applicant sha11 not be placed un a Planning Conuni_ssion , ��enda unless the appli,cation is oo�lete, and is submitted prior ta the closing date prior to a hearinc� , . ." Staff does not agree that this section has been adhered to in this application for th.e followin� reason. Tn -the previous application, Main Street Developm�xit, Ltd, did not "control" the land upon which Western Orec�on Marine is locatedp Although the applicant apparently has entered a.nto a legal purchase oontra,ct, Western Oregon Marine has a valid lease a�.nt which ex�ires on Ju�,y 1, 1984. Nowhere in this application is this fact addressed. It i.s not the responsibility of Staff to play an investigative ro1e; but in this instance, the ooncealed fact seriously al,texs the �7,an by making on1X one (the applicant°s) transportation/circulation patt�rn �oss�,ble, Note that thi:s time no ment3,on o� "phasing" the development is suggested. This can only mean tha,t i� the �roject is approved as submitted, the Westexn Ore�on Nlarine lease wi1,1. be termina,ted. This �may not be the case. Realistica].ly, this is the sa� Main Street pro�osal we have seen l�efore w:i,th �our (4) more acres and additional retail square footage. The applicant has steadfa,stly refused to oonsider alternate traffic c�:rculation patterns ; for this site. Staff can only ass�ne that the Western Oregon Marine problem i is a basic ca,use �or this reluctance to consider an alternat plan. This � traffic issue was the single issue before the Planning Cammission last time. Tt i,s before you ac�ain. The City has engaged the services of ; tra��ic en�ineers to revi.ew the plan as submitted and to analyze the alternate ; plan. St.af� has worked out wi,th w�rked out with ODOT. 'I'his presentation ; wi11 be made a portion of the report at the Planning Comni.ssion hearing. I I I � i I I STAFF 1ZEPORT AC�NDA PJO. 5.4 TIGARD PL�NNING CONIlKISSTON MAY 5, 1981 — 7:30 p.m. . FClfn]LER JUNIOR HIGH - IsECTCJRE ROOM 10865 5W Walnut, Ti.garc� Page 5 I. FINDINGS OF FP,CI': i 1) The Comprehensive P1an indicates A-12 "Multi--family R�szdential" � � for Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AC Lot 2301 on Ash A�enue ( a portion j of this 1ot is within the one hundred year floodplain) , C-5 "Hi.ghway j CociaY�rcial°' for W�shir�gton County Tax 1Kap 2S1 2,AC Lot 1600, and C-3M � "Main Street Commreial'" for Washingt�n County Tax Map 2S1 2AC Lots 1200, � 130d, 14Q0, 1500, 220Q, and 201. Lot 201 is shown in the one hundred year 1 flooc3plain o,f Fanno Creek on the Comprehensive �1an Map. y, 2� A�,1 of the pxnposed uses a� allaaed in the C-3M "Main Street Ccutm�rcial," zone. R�ference; Chapt�r 18,30 of the Code. 3� ��licant has submitted a. Sensitive Lands Application to t1�3e City. 'rhi,s a�pl,ica,tion wi.11, be pxesented to the Z�lanning Commi.ssion in the future. , s° 4) ,An app]L�,cation �or a Mi,nor Land Partition (MLP 4-81) has been 3� ,filed t:o se�xat,e approximZt�ly one (1) acre �rcan Washington County Tax Map � 2S1 2AC Lot 2301 on Ash Avenue. i 5) Appl,icant has not �o�lted on the Weste:rn Ore�n Nlarine �ease, � nor has the i,saue o� Ash Ayenue been addrQSSed as a portion of this application. NPO # 1 �o1�cy states; °Ash �,venue shoul.d be extended acxoss Fanno Creek, enabli.ng acoess �: to �he Neic�hbo,rhood's cammeraial area without using Pacific Highway/ �', Desa;gn features should be used to slaw traffic and make the street ;:; as sa�e a.s possib7,e. " ' 6) Pub2i,c services are available to the site. �� ia 7) The narrative does not address the underlXing issue � Should ;; w� a,7.7,cxa tlie �our (4� acres o� P,�-12 "Mu1ti-fanuly Residential" zone change �i�. �_ to C�31� "Ma,i,n Street Com�rcial'�: Staff is reluctant tr� insist upon this ;;; beca,us� �� .s apparent from I�PO # 1's recent policy menn that this is not `'� �, a real �ssue with thent. On1y one person to date has requested that the zone }; not be cha��ed. The conversion of this particul.ar 1ot from A-12 to C-3M � could be related to the LCDC densi.ty iss� if it were not for the fact that ,. some o� this four (4) aare parcel is in the one hundred year flooc7plain and ' is, there�ore, not sui�table for constructian of Mu1it-family tmits. (.` '�`. 8) Tha,s appl�.cati,on shaXl be reviewed under Chapter 18.56 Planned �' �;; Deve],o�Znen.t D�,Stx'ict (�D) R � f� f'i +'� t' {;. �5 t{+ i 7'' d �, r� �Rr.... . .. �� .. . � � .. . "� . � � .. . . .::., __. ....... _._ ...� � .._.:.......,......... . . _ . _ . . . . .. .. . 4 �,. I" (`: F-'. t {'.. �TAFF I�PORT ,`,' AC-�NNDA NO. 5.4 ?;� TIGARD PLZ�I�INING CONA4ISSION ��; N�,Y 5, 1981 - 7:3U p.m. F'OWLER JUNIOR HIQi - I�CTURE ROOM k: 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard Page 6 II. CONQ�USIOIVARY FINDTNGS 1) The plan as submitted does not address the primazy concerns of Staff I relative to traffic circul.ation. 'I'he traffic study as submitted does not �`! adequately address the impact of this developm�nt on traffic circulation � in the entire downtc�rnm area. This traffic study is site oriented only and `� does not address th� larc�er issue of overall impact to Main Street. "� 2) The Planning Ca�dssion did not approve of the traffic circulation pattern during the �revious publi,c process far this site. Significa�t traf�ic has been added ta the site. A txaffic study will be presented befare the Planni.ng Coinnission on M�ay 5, 1981, by Nir. Woelk on behalf o� the Staf�. 3) '1Yhe l�ncertainty o� the lease situation relative to Western Oregon Mzrz.ne prohibits any alternate transportation/circulat.ion plan developmant : an the part o� St:a�� and Oxec�nn Departzrent of Transportation (ODOT) , and , therefore, dictates that this development be phased, should the lease �in ir� e�fect until 1984, No application fc�r phasecl development has been `! made. �; �; III. STAk'F �C?N�IDATION E� Staff recommends clenial o� this 1�reli�i.nary Planned Unit I)evelopment. The j �o1l,owin� a_ss�s must be addressed prior to the applicants return before �� the Plannin� Conmissi,on. ' � � � If the ,��1lawin� concPrns are satis£i,ed, the applicant m�y requ�st a " sirrniltaneous Pxelimi,nary Plan Review and General Plan Review before the � �'lannin Com�.i.ssi,on. The Sta,�f, sha1.1 deter^mine if/when this item shall be 5 1 c�d on a ture a enda. No a lication sha11 be acoe ted b the Ci '� � a fu g pp p Y tY � unJ.ess these �.ssues have been addressed to Staff's satisfaction. � � 1) Mai,n.. Stxeet Lar�d Car�any sha11 own/"c:�ontxol" all proper.ty on j which develo�ment is proposed. Tf the lease with Western Oregon Marine � cannot be bxoken4 this proposed development sha11 not be presented to the � I i � city unti,l the terininat�.on date of sa�.d lease. , 2) licant sha11 be res�onsible for the alteration of the site ' �PP 1 plan brought about by the final tra£�ic,�atterns approved by the City. A,7.1 o�sts associated with tra�£ic signal �vement, alteration and installation sha11 be �ai,d by the dev�elo�er. Z'h� Oregon Department of Transportation j � � STAFF �ORT AC�]DA NO. 5.4 TIC�tD PLATVNING CONY�LLSSTON �iY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. Z�OWLER JLTN.LOR HI(�i - L� � Page 7 and the City must agree on the traffic circulation patterns prior to a General Review. 3) The Ash Street e�ension issue is tr� be resolv�d by �he Planning Comnission and City Council prior to a General Plan Review of this project. 4) The Park Board sha11 review the plans with the applicant and resolv� all d.i�ferences prior to a General Plan Review. .5) �.'kie Publi,c Works Direc:tor sha11 review the Sensitive Lands application caith the applicant and sha,11 sub�mit a, report. to the Planning Can�ussinn with the Genera�. �?1an Review•. 6) All concerns o� the Tualatin Rura1 Fire Protection District shall be addressed, particuTarly related to the extensi�n of Ash Avenue (across �'anno Creek) and t.raffic c�rculati,on on site. . e H . g n�,rector