The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 04/07/1981 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AGENDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1981 — 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR. HTGH — LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard � 1. Open Meeting 2. Rol.l Call 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting �II �, 4. Planning Com�nission Communication � 5. PuL�lic Hearing: A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony: l. Proponent's 2. Opponen�t's 3. Cross-Examination 5.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTo ZOA 7—$OA (PLANNED DISTI;TCT DEVELOPNIENT CHP,PTER 18.56 AMENDMENT) 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 1-81 (A70/80PD fiOME FOR THE AGED) 5,� COMPREHENSTVE PLAN REVISION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CPEtPD 3--81 (ANGELYNN/ HAMREUS R7 TO Al2PD PRELIMINARY AND GENERAL PLAN R�V'IEW) NPO #2 5,4 CONDTTTONAL USE, CiJ 3-81 (MC NIECE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED TN AN R7 ZONE REHEARING) NPO #2 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 5-81 (GALLQ VINEYARDS R2 TO R5) 1VP0 #7 5.6 COMPREHENSTVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-81 (HAMPTON STREET RU4 TO CP) NPO #4 5,7 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 5—�il (DUNHAM COMPAIJY RU4 TO CP) NPO #4 5,8 COMPREHENS2VE PLAN E2EVTSION, CPR 6-81 (BONITA PARK/CHATTERLEY R7 TO RS) NPO #5 5,9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 7-81 (NPO DENSITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVTSIONS) 6. Old Business 7. New Business 8. Other Business 9. Adjournment AGENDA TIGARD gLANNING COMMI��'ION MAY 5, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. , FOWLER JUNTOR HIGH - LECTCIRE ROOM � 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard I, l. Open Meeting I, 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes from Frevious Meeting 4. Planning Commission Communication 5. Public Iiearing� A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony: l. Proponent's ' 2. Opponent's 3. Cross-Exami.nation j 5.1 VARIANCE, 'S7 4-81 (HE�DT PARK�ED �AUS'E) NPQ # 3 VARTANCE TO MINTMUM T,OT Ok' 7500 sq, ft. PER LOT TN R5 ZONE 5.2 SUBDIVISION, S 3^81 (COLONY� CREEK PHASE TI AND TII) N�O # 5.3 ZONE CH�NGE PT.�NNED DTSTR2�CT DEVELpPT�lENT, ZCPD 4�$1 (JDG DEVELOPMENT/ A 12 TO �12PD) NPO # 5.4 COMPREIiENSTVE PT�AN REV�SI.ON CPR 6-�81 BONITA PARK/CHATTERLEY R7 TO R5) NPO # 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN �E'VISTON � ZpNE CHANGE PLANNED DTSTE22CT DEVELOPMFNT CPRFD 8 & 9, 1981 (M1�TN STR�ET DEVELQPMENT) NPO # 6. Old Business 7, New �usiness 8. Other Business 9. Adjournment ..�. , I I ,. , PUBLIC NOTICE �i TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION ; April 7, 1.981 �'' Page 2 �� !1 ' f; 5.7 ZONE CH.ANGE, ZC 5-81 (DUNHAM COMPANY RU4 TO CP) NPO #4 ?� � � A request by Gary Dunham for a Zone Change from Washington County RU4 ; � P an desi ation CP "Commercial Prafessional° � to Cit of Ti ard NPO #4 1 Y 9n g ,: located at 12720 SW 67th and lots adjoining north, northeast, and east ;; (Washington Coun,ty Tax Map 2S1 lAD, Tax Maps 100, 200, 600, and 700) . h 5.8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISTON, CPR 6-81 (BONITA PARK/CHATTERLEY R7 TO R5) NPO #5 r � ;; A request by Jim Chatterley for a Comprehensive Plan k�vision from � City of Tigard R7 "Single Family Residential 7,500 sq,uare feet per lot" �,' � to RS "Single Family 5,000 square feet per lot" on 1.8 acres at the �' corner of 79th Avenue and Bonita Road to construct four (4) attached �� single family units and two (2) detached single family units , (Washington t. County Tax Map 2S1 128, Tax Lot 4000) . �'�' �� ;: :,i 5.9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVTS_TON, CPR 7-81 (NPO DENSITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN F2EVI SI ON5) kj ,, A request by City of Tigard for a change in zonixig on certain parcels I! � in selected NPO areas to increase density in 3.ine with Goa1 #10 - Hoixsing. li • ;i , , 'I � I �'I [, �' i^�� (�; ,�I �j 4�i TO BE PUBLISHED TN THE TIGARD TIMES, MARCH 25, 1981 AND APRIL 1, 1981 �'i I; i ;: � ;t . . . .. . . . . . _.. . . .. . . .. . .. . �!T . .. .. . . .. . .. _. . . , . . . . . . ... : . ,.. . ,. �, .. PUBI,IC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION .�PRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR HTGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 7-80A (PLANNED DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT LEIAPTER 18.56 AMENDMEIVT) A request by City of Tigard for an ordinance amenc7ing Chapter 18.56, Sections 20, 30, and 40 relating to P].anned District Development and deviations or variances from standards of Title 18 and Title 17. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 1-81 (A70/8QPD HOME FOR THE AGED) Planning Commission review of a zoning ordinanae establishing certain criteria to be met in the A70/80PD Zone. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVT5ION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CPRPD 3-81 (ANGELYNN/ HAMREUS R7 4C0 Al2PD PRELIMINARY AND GENERAL PLAN REVTEW) NPO #2 A request by Calvin Hamreus for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of. Tigard R7 "Single Family Residential" to Al2PD "Multifamily Residential Planned District Development" Preliminary and General Plan Review taking in all the lots surrounding SW Angel Place (Washington County Ta�; Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lots 2401, 2402, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 470U) . 5,4 CONDTTIONAL USE, CU 3-81 (MC NIECE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED IN AN R7 ZONE '� REHEIIRING) NPO #2 f,. A request by Neil and Victorial McNiece for a Conditional Use to build single famil,y attaehed homes in an R7 "Single Family Residential" Zone s ;r located at 'i1835 SW 95th Avenue (Washington County Tax Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lot 2500) , k; 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISTON, CPR 5-81 (GALLO VINEYARDS R7 TO R5) NPO #7 A request by Herb Morissette Bu�.lders for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard R7 "Single Family Residential 7P500 square feet per �:� lot" to City of Tigard R5 "Single Family Residential 5,000 square feet i;' per lot" to build single family attached homes located at the southeast �; corner of SW Tigard and SW 113th Ave•nue (Washington County Tax Map 151 34DC, `; Tax T.�ot 2900) . '`� i:; �� 5,6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-81 (HAtKPTON STREET RU4 TO CP) NPO #4 �' u,` A request by City of Tigard and the NPO #4 Members for a Comprehensive �:� Plan Revision from Washington County RU4 to City of Tigard CP "Commercial �;_ Professional" located on Hampton Street between 70th and 72nd (Washington �! County Tax Map 2S1 lAC, Tax Lots 1100, 1200, 130d) . �'� �: �_� �5�� • ��S r;,. SQ( i� � MINUT�.S TIGARD PLANHZNG COMMISSIQN April 7t 19�31 - 7:30 p.m. I'owlex Juni,ox Iiigh - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, OR President Tepedino called the meetin� to order at 7:35• ROI,L CALI.s Present: Bonn, Helmer, Herron, Kolloas� Moen, Owens, Speaker� Tepedino. �Tote: Commi�sioner Funk arrived about 5 minutss late. Absento None Staf f: Howard� �iewton The MINUTFS of the March 3 meeting were considered. Comraissioner Moen asked they be correct:�d to show that he was excused rather than absent. Tepe�ino moved the minutes as corxected be approved. Ko�leas seconded tho motion, vrhich carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONSt Ths president ur�ed the commissio�ers to complete and return tho Ethics Commission farm sen� to each member of the planning commi.ssion. He called attention to a copy of a letter he vtrote to M�yor Bishop concerning relations with I,CDC in which he , proposed can,sulting with his counterparte in nearby munici.palities. Commissioner Kolleas ob�ected to hold�.ng special meetings for a�plicants who f�el their projects are of special importance. She also objected to the overruling by the city council of planning com� missi.an actions on the basis of strongly voiced protests by only a faw people. The presiden� read the usual. notice of suthority for and .procedure to be followed in the meeting. l'3e then opened the meeting for PU}3LIC HEARINGS. 5.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT� ZOA 7-80A (PI,ANNED DISTRICT DEVELOk'M+'TT CHAPTER 18.56 1�MENDMENT) A request by City of Tigard �nr an oxdinance amending Chapter 18.56, Sect3ons 20, 30, and 40 relati.ng to Planned Distric�t Deyelopment and deviations or variances from standax�ds of TitJ�e 1$ and Title 17. Haward explained this was an amendwent to the Planned District Developmen� Ch��ter which was rewritten and adopted several monthe ago. These changes requ�.re �ha� dev�at�.ons from atandards shall be stated in writin�, with a justifi,e�tion for the doviation. Thie is a change found desirabl.e through working with the reNritten ordinance. � . MINUTTS ' ',� TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 19�31 Page 2 The city is the appli�ant� hence no other APPLICANT'S PRESII�TATION �tha�'1 i;he staff's was rttade. 'I'here was no FUBbIC TE.STTMONY. COMMISSION DIhSCUSSION .AND AC`PION: A slight correctian �n 18.65.020 C(10) was ver�fied.. No commissioners had problems wi.th �he proposecl amendments. Bonn thereupon MOVED �hat the amendments ta the ordinance bn reeom�ended by the plaxming coramiIISlon for adoption by the cit�y cauncil. Helmer seconded the motion, which carr�.ed unanim.ously. 5.2 ZONE ORAINANCE AMENDMENT� ZOA 1-81 (A70/$OPD HUME FOR T�E AG�D) Plannin� Commissioia review of a zoning ordinance es�abli�hing certain criteria to be met in the A70/80PD Zone. Ii�ward explainod tha hi�tory o.f the proposa]. for A70/80F'D Home for the Aged. He also read in�o the record a letter dated Marc:h 31. from John A. Butler, secretary of NPC7 #l, complainin� the planning director nor any planning commission members attended �he meeting called by �taff for March 31 to con�ider the concerns of the NPO nn this matter, and suggesting no furthcr aci;ion be taken by the commission on the ordinance until auch a mQeting ie held. Since the app7.icant is tlae ci�ty, staff�s presentation became the AFPLICANT�S PR�SE,NTATION. PUBL�C TESTIMONY, a11 in opposition, was given by: **�* Pat Hutchinson� who complained at ].ength about nonattendance by staff and plann�.ng eommissioners at ths meeting of March 31, to which rfr. Dutler'� letter referred. She felt the ordinance was writt�n for a part�.cular development, which st�e felt impropex. She wanted more specifics written into the ordinance. Concerns whiGh she expressed wexe for sidewal.ks, signal lights to all�w ea#'e pedestrian crossa.ng of Ha11 Boulevard, the traffic on Hall, adequate bus traneportation and a bus �tap for the resa,dez�ta. She quest3.oned the type of businesses to be allowed on the development as pArt of the environment for the elderly resi.dents. She objected �o a convenience s�Core which would draw from outside the complex because of the traffic genera�ed. She said the + setback requirements are too vague; that the percenta�e of 1ot caverage is rlot etated, nor is the str�ndard of 7.andscaping in terms of araa of ,II site s�ated. She questioned the adequacy of parking requirement� and ;', how it would be affec�ed by businesses on the si.te. Mfis. Hutchinson reparted interv�.ews with board mambers o� the church to the south about the bui].ding height. Thsy disapprov�d �he ei�ht- story lieight, as did many of the neighbors. She ca7.].ed attention ta the 120 �oot height limitation mentioned in the proposed Chapter 18.25.050 vs. 85 feet in the draft submitted a mon�h a�o. t. 1�''�� CROSS-EXAMINATION AND REB�TT�'AL: Commissioner Speaker asked Nirs. � : r' . � . � . ......,,.- . .. . k, �', jl � . .. . ._. . 1'. l. i: � [. ! �: i S- MINU'�ES TIGA'RD PLANNTNC, COMM2SSION April '7, 1981 Page 3 FIutchinson. specifical.ly what is the objection to an ei�ht-story building in Tigard. She stai:ed the people ahe had talked to di.�approved of such a high rise buildin� because they felt it would be the staxt o,f other such buildings i.n Tigards and they did not want Tigard to take on that particular aapect of the metropolitan com�nunity. Speaker countered that thQ proposed orda.nance covered �nly one site; that it is a question whether the personal preference af some people for lovrer buildings should offset the effa.ciency inherent in a high s:ise structure for th,is use; that i:he publ.ic has opportunity for considexable input with respect to any other high rises of this type�-first at the planning commission and then the ca.ty counci,l level for an amendment to the ordinance; then a presentation by the developer to the NPO, who bhen, puts their concerns in writin� to the pl�nning commission; then twice before the pZanning commissi.on and again before the city council for approval of the planned deve].opment required, He fel.t the ob�ections represented chiefly a resistance to change, pointing out that we are in fact part of inetropolitan Portland, whether we like it or not, and that we should adjust to the fact. Hg felt the objectors are expressing a hope rather than a reasoned objacti.on. Moen xaised questions about the March 3i meeting to which both Mr� Butler and Mr�. Hutchinsnn had compl.ained about nonattend�xice on the part o� the commission. Mrs. Iiutchinson reiterated her complaint, e�cpl.ained in part by Fiovrard, who offered his apologies for the way things tur�ed out. The president clrased discussion on this matter as �e�.ng irrelevant. Mr. Richard Sturgiss, developer of the proposed home fox the aged, a�lsed if tae might shotiv some s�.i.des e permission for which was denied by th� president. He then responded to the objections and concerns expressed individually. He to7.d of diaous�ions with ODOT, who feel a signal at Burnham and Hall would be advisable, which would elirainate a number of the concerns presented by P�rs. Tiutchinson. He commented that the objection to the hei.ght of the building voiced at the mee�ing she men- tioned was not as un�nimously in opposition as she inferred. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Howard addressed the parking issue: each on-site busiriess would have to provide sufficient parking to meet the aode requirements. He reported discussions wi.th Tri-MQt, and e�forts to get a gran.t for certain public iraprovements which would make trans�or�ation. easier, not only for this proj�ct, but �or the sena�or center on O�Mara Stree�. He reported the developer would be putting in more than $25,000 in park system development fees, besides dedicati.on of floodpla3.n for park purposes. He reviewed a1.1 the agonciee that hav�e t�een and will be consu].ted, and the extensive proce�se� and hearings yet to come be�'ore a buildin� permit aan be issued. He felt that writing into the ordinance condit�.ons for this ane project, which would become appl3,cable to all future developmen�s under the ordinance, was not reasonable in view of the extensive �� 1 � � MTNUT�S j TIGARU PLANDIING COMM�SSTON � Apra.�. 7: i981 Page y. opportunity for �ublic input before a building is finally built. Tepedino agreed a draft orda.nance should not be encumbered with the detail called for by N2�C? �1, since the concerns are addressed in other por�ions of the code, including site c3esign review. In furtt�er discusw s�.nn� Qwens questioned whether �eople really understand �he p�ocess. I3c�nn pointed out this 3.s about the lowest elev�tion for a ta11 building in Tigacd. I€elmer felt any conven�,ence aut2ets should be primarily tar tY�e resideni:s. Moen questior�ed the necessity for e�.ght stories. Howaxd and Sturgis �old of the present ab3.lity of the fire protection distx°ict to service adequately azi eight stc�ry bu:ilding. Howard a�roed to two modification� of the draft ordinance: limiting the height to 85 feet, and evaluating convenience outlet type of business on their own merits as propased by developers. Bonn MOV�D the planning commisaionrecommend the draft of Ordinance 18.25, as amended in two places by staff, be adopted by the city council. The motian was �ecended by Helraer and carried unanimously. 5.'j COMPREHENSIVE PLAN R�VISSON �LANNED DEVES,O�'IENTs CPI2PD >-$1 (ANGELYNN/HJ#MREUS R7 TO Al2Pll PR:GbzMINARY' ANA GENERAL PT�AN REVIEW) NPO �2 A request by Calvin Iiamreue for a Comprehensive Plan Revi- sian from City of Tigard 177 "Single F'amily Resi.dential" to Al2PD "�ultlfamily l�esidential Planned Dist�a.ct Develop- ment" Prelimin�ry and General Plan Review taking in a3.1 the 7.n�s surrounding 5W Angel �'lace (Wa�hington, County Tax 'Map 1�1. 35CD, �ax �,ots �401, 24oz, 3900, �.000, 4ioo, 4zoo, ,�.��o, cFr�ao, �+5oa p y.600 r 47ao). Howard re�d tho STAFF REPORT and RECOMMEND� AT_ IONS. He cor.rected Recommendatian 4 to specify "minor" oollector street standards. He i,ndicated o3a the wall map proposed developments and the street plan aontomplated ,for the area. The president offered a mo�ion lift�ng this matter from the table, duly secosided and casr3.ed. The APPI,ICANT'S PRESENTATTON was made by Ca�.vin Hamreus, 50`75 SW Main Street, Beaverton. He pointed to the trazisition between the sing�.e stbry houseQ bordexing this development and the two story townhouses proposed� a�nd pointed rrl.th prida to t'he preserva�ion of I m�zch ma�or vegetation on site. ' PUBLIC TP.�STIMONY in favor was presented by Mike Stan, 11.785 SW 95th .Avenue, an owner of ad�oiniag proper�y. He complimented the staff on this reti*ision of the original plan, which he now finds quite accept- ab].e� and agrees with the street plan for the area (xhich affects his property also) . �_ _ _ � ]�"�NUT�;S TTGARD PT,ANNTI�TG COMMISSIOId April 7s i98i Pag� 5 Rya,ri Oo�rien, 140 NE Third Ave. , I�illsboza, repres�nting the McNlece property (the subject of the next agenda item) stated approval of the p1an, and opined the circulation pattern suggested would "fa.t the needs of development in the area'�. COMMTSSION llISCUSSI0I3 AI�D AC`rION; �Speaker called attention to the importan.ee of Recommendati�n 2, which estab].islaes 'the �treet plan sug�ested a� the s�treet plan for the ar.ea. Moen questianed the:,ctreet layout� for the �tcNfiice praperty, responded to by Howard. �onn MUVEA approval of of Got�pre;�ensive Pl�n Revision CPR 3-81, based on sta�f findings and recommendati�ns. Hel.mer secoazded the mo�i.on, which c arried unanimausly. 5.1� GONDITIONAL USEy C�J 3-81 (NIC NIEGE SIKGLE �'AMTLY A`�TACIiED IN .F�N R7 ZONE RLHEAk2TNG) NPU {�2 A rec�uest by Neil �nd Victax�ia McNiece for a Conditional Use ta build s�,np;le family attaclaed homes in an R'7 "Sin�le I'amily Re,ider�t�a3." Zone located at ii8�5 sv� 95th a�venue (Washin�;ton County Tax Ma� zsi 35cv, Tax Zot 2500) . T3oward reari the STAFF R�P'ORT �& . R�COMMENDATIQNS, correctin� k�eaommezzdation 3 to ca11 fo.r "ma.z�nx" co�.lector street standards. The AP�'I��CANT*S PRESEid'�ATION wa.s made by 12yan O�Brien, who out7.i,ned the features of the development, poin�G3.ng out the Y►funmerhead turn around offered a 45 foot turnin� radius. Tie asked that site design review be nmitted on this projec�, which will have gaAd 1.andscapin� of the i�65 - 68,000 units. . President Tepedino asked for and received a motion to remove this a.tem from the table, which was duZy seconded and carried. There was no PU33LIC TF;STTMONY. COMMI�SION DISCUSSTON AND AC`�'T.0 s Haward exp7.ained the necessity far sa.te design review ta comply with the code. Bonn stated he fel� the concexn,s expressed at the previous hearin� had been satisfactoril.y addresaed, and MOVED approval o� Conditional ' Use CU 3�81, based an. staff findings and recommendations. The rnotion , was seconded b� Ko1l.eas, and carried unanimously. Hc�ward su�gestod the street plan outlined for the area be formally adopted. 13onn MOV:�v the s�reet plan m�z�ked E�hibit A, dated April 7, 1981, be recommended by the planntng commission to the city council for adr5�tion. Kollea� seconded the motion� whieh carxied unanimously. I r�zrtuT�s TIGARD PL.ANNING COMMISSION .�pril 7, 1931 Pa�e 6 At �:�ne o°clock the pre�id.ent declared a fa.va-zninut� recess. 5.5 COMPREHENSIV� PLAN REVISION, Ck'R 5�-81 (GAI,LO VINEYARDS R'7 to R5? A request by Tierb Morissette �3uilders for a Camprehensive Ylan Havis�.on :from City of Tigard R7 ��Single Famil.y Resi- dential 7,500 square feet pez° lo�t�' �a Ci.ty of Tigard R5 "Singl.e Famiyy Resident�.al 5,000 square feet per l.at�' to build single famil.y attached homes ].ocated at the southeast qorner of S'Ifl Tigard and SW ll3th Avonue (Washa.ngton County Tax Map 1S1 34DC, Z'ax Z,ot 2900) . Iioward read the STAFF REPORT and RE�OMMP�1DATiONS. He alsa re�d i.n�o the recorci a 'letter dated April 5 frc�m Mrs. Michael K. Tiardin, owner of Lot 19 adjacent t� the si�e. The concerns expressed w�re (�) traffic� and access to the exisCi.ng house at the end of 113t1� Ave. ; (b) two-story homes ovex°looking thoi,r property; (e) �he drainage sit�za-� tion, especially with greatar deve�.opmerat. I�Ioward then reviewed the initial plan� v�hich i�ncluded many flag lota; and the h�.s�ory, whi.ch inc�.ud�d opposition by ��lie school distr�.c�t to a change in the street can�a.guxation. He explained the revised proposal also. The A,PPLICANT"S PR�SENTATION was made by Haus Vatheur of Iiumphrey j � Engineering, ?750 SW Skyla.ne, Portland. Ae explained the units would � be comrnon-wall on7.y at the garages. Iie recognized the problems with dr�inage, and agraed to cta�f condi�ian�, whi.ch should remedy this problem. 3 7?U13LIC TEST�MONX in favor was �iven by G1en McBride of Herb Mori.ssotte Hizilde:rs, 7y.70 SW 76th Ave. , Portland. In 1g78 the school baard was opposed to vacation and realignment of the street, wha.ch prevented proceeda.ng witt� a devel.opment af the present nature. In the meantime �heir ap�ositi.on has ceased, and therefore Morissette would la,ke to proceed wa.th the project, which includes moving 1.13th to a7.1ow ' � be�ter lot configura�ion„ : Speaking in oppo�i�ion was D. Brian Morski, 1�.690 SW ll�.th Pl.ace. I �ie Q�px�e�sed the concerns voiced in tha Hardin letter, and concern � �oz° ths traffic whi.ch would be �enerated on Tigard Street. ' I�Ie fe].t t,he cixculation pattern is poor. s With respect to the s�reel: situation, Howard explained the c3.ty ! cur.rently l.acks ful], jurisdiction over tk►e streets in. ques�ion, but 1 the council is seriously consi.dering annaxing the is7.ands here, which � wauld give the city control over the streets ar�d could then bring a ,', solution tq the prablems ment:Lnned. Likewise with the drainage situa- tioil. He caut�.aned that devel.opr�ent is taking place very ra�idly in Ti�ard, and that increased traffic is an inevitable consequence. i i; 4„ a: 6` � .. . ... . � . .. . . . . . � . . . . .. .._ ... .. � .. .. .... ..�.._��.� MINUTE5 TIGA�2D P�l�PTNING CUMMISSION Apri.l 7, 19$1 Page 7 i I CONTMISSION DISCUSSTON AND A�TTO�I: Ovtens asked for details of � solut3.ons�to he dr�inage �].an, expl.a3,nod by Howarde Moen got cl.arifi.- � cation from the develaper that o��y aeta��a single family units would ' be pl.ace�. on �h� west side of 113th. Sonn rai�ed the question oF dedication fox• streets and street improvements. Haward expla:tned why nonremonstxance agreements are m,andated on this development, and out- lined prnspective early projects on Ti,gard Street which will 1.ead to ful'1 develo�ment of the sts°eet to city standards. Tepedino inq�ired i about ability nf fire equipment to mazaeia,ver an the revamped street. Herron MOVED appro�val of Comprehensive Plan Ftevisian CPR 5-87., bas�d on staff finding� and racommendatians. Moen seconded the motion, which ��rried un�nimouel.y. 5,6 GOMPRIIi�NSIVE �'LAN R�.'VISION, G�'R 4-$1: (H.AMPTON ST�EET RU4 TO CP) NPO f�y. �A request by City of T�gard and the NPO �4 Member� for a Compxehen�ive Plan Kevision t`ram Washa.n�ton Courity RUt� to City of Ti�ard CP 11Comrnercia7. Prafessianal'a l,oaa�ed on �iaYapton Street betwesn 70th and 72nd (Waehington County Tax Map ?_Sl IAC, Tax I,ot� 1.1DQ, 1200, 1..$QQ) . �ioward read the 57.��A�'F REPOR.� and RECpMMENDA�TONS, correcti.ng the stat�ment on �'T.oca�:i,can�' to refl.ect that aZ1. tlaree lots axe inside ths city. Sa.n,ee the applicant is NFO {�1� anci the city� the staff report is also the AI'PT.ICANZ''S PFtESEIVTATIUN. �iaw�d ro�orted his inquiry of city �aunsel about �rlae�her i:his can be done w�.thout a vote of the rasa.dents (this being :�n one �f the so�callea �'convers3.on districts'" wha.ch requir� three-fo�xrths af the residents to appxove change from xosidential) . Couz�se). reported wha� the N�'C? did, they can undo. '�he request of NPO {�� for a barm and for a height �imi�atian will be honored. The�e �fas no PUBLTC TESTIMONY. COMMISSIUN DTSCUSSION AND ACTION: Commiss3,oners expressed no • .,�-----,-- concerns, so Speaker NiOVED approval of Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 4-$1, ba�ed on et�ff findings and recomimendation. The mota.on Mas sec:onded by FIc�lmer and carried unanimousZy. 5.7 ZUNE CT�tIidGE, ZC 5-�$1 (DUN�I� CUM�ANY RU�1� TO CP) NPQ �. A request by Gary Dunham for a 2oz►e Ghange �rom Washing�on County R.Uy. to City of Tigard NPO #4 plan designation CP '�Cozamereial. $rofesaion�.l'� locatec� at 12720 SW Fi7th and �.ots adjoining north� n,ox�heas�, and east (Washington �' County �.'ax Map 2S1 IAD, Taac Maps 1.00, 200, 600, and 700). �'� ,;, 4;s j:':�1 f;I , . . �K''::�� :. .., , � .. � . � 5,�. . . ' . . . . . . �'.'. MxNU��s TIG„ARD PI.ANNING CONII�fISSION Apri7. ?, 1q81 Pa�;e 8 Howard re�d the STAFF REPOk�T and RECQMMENDATIONS. The ApPI.IG,ANT'S PRESFNTATTOId was made by Will.i�m Baker of the �� Dunha� Campany, 1�730 SW Mac�;darp. Ave. � Portland, who explain.ed tha development would be very mueh in keeping with the surx^oundings--two stary of�ice t�uildings. There was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY. COMMTSSION:`DISCU�SSION AND ACTION: Speaker commented this looked tike a well though� out presentat3.on and development, and MOVED fox ap�roval of Zone Change ZC 5-8�., based oz� staff fzndings and recommenda� tions. Kolleas seconded the motaon, which pass�d unanimously. s.$ COMPREH�NSIV'E 1'T.AN REVISION, CPR 6-81 (BONITA PARIC/CHAT`PERLEY R7 To R5) Npo #5 .A request �y Jim Chatterley for a Cpmprehen�ive PJ.an Revi- sion from City of Tigard R7 t1Single k'amily Residential 7,500 square feet per lot�� tq �t5 PrS�,n�le x��uniiy 5,OOQ square feet per lot1° on 1.8 acres at the corner of 79th Avenue and �3ani.ta Road to construct four (1�) attached s3.n�le family units and two (2) detachad single family units (Washi.ngton Coun,ty Tax: Map 2S1 12B, Tax Lat 4000) . Ho�ard read the STA�')+ L�EI?QRT and F2ECOMM�NDATIONS. `.�h� APPLICAN'P'S PRESENTA�IQN wa� made by Jim Chatterley, 2991U SW �add Hill Ra�d, Sherwrood, who r�uggested the required 5 foot and 1� f'aot dodications may l�ave be�n reversed (to be checked by staff with Public Works) . PUBLIC TESTIMOi�Y, a,ll in opposition, was given by: **# Debra Naubext, 1�:365 �SW 80th P].ace, who objected to what sh� termed the �'erasion�' of single family developments, and asked that i:he inte�rity qf exist�ng neighbox�hoods be maintained. She was not so muc'h opposed to this p�rticular development as to what she perceived to be the process by which increased densities are achieved in tha comrnunity. *** Betty Weaver, Z467o SW ?9th Ave. , who reported living in the area for 30 years and wished the quiet single family cl�aracter of the �^ea to be presorved. She expressed oppositian to rer.tals. *** Shaldon Scalar, 1t�725 SW 79th, who reiterated the concerns of the prev�,ous two rpeakera� and questioned the ability o,f the roads �o handl.e the increased lnad. MZNUTES TIGABD PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 1981 Page 9 ; CROSS-EXATITNATION AND RF.�Ur.CT,AL: I.awrence reported ttte I cut�tin� of Bome large fir t�ees in the area. I3e waE told that certain af them were ordered to be sav:ed, he was under �he imprassion, by the , Tigaxd �Planning Director. He quest3.oned whether leavi.ng a few unpro�- ' tected trees i.s saf�, H-oward �es�onaea it was not t'rom h�.s office� since the area i,s not in the cihy and therefore the city has no control. i over such matters. FIe then proceeded to explain the zonin� along Honita and in the area, and future development that w�.1.1 take pl.ace. Mr�. Naubert d�scussed the suit againet tha Ci�y of Tigard brought by some t�f he,r neighbo.rs. It was felt that the planning commissi.on mus� :�a��t 6n present zoning as legally establishsd--not on what may in ��xe future result from a legal sutt. Speakex� s�ated it is reported about 50 per cent of Tigard is single fantily, and 50 per cent is muitifamily or rental. Iie asked wh,y there i,s cahtinual c�ppos�.ta.on before the commission to z�antal un�.tsi. .Mrs. Y�eaver related ac�s by adjacent apartmen� dwellers ranging from lack of consideration to �ninz�r vandalism. Thes� she attributed tn �he temporax•y nature of theix occupancy in any on� locata.on. pthers fe7,t that rental properties are not maintained very we11 on th� whole, but �he �en�eral feeling is th,at renters da not have the feeling of per`�taa►enoe which proinpts good care of the premises. C�OMMISSTON DISCUSSIOPT AND ACTION: Funk raised ques�ic�n�s about the al�:�gr��len�t of 7gth �rith �he street from t'he i?andall subdivisi,on to the xzpr�h. ' :�Te �ras not happy with the si,n�l.e fama.ly homes at ttae end of a cul.-de�-sac of duplexes. Other commissioz�ers were less than enth.usiast�.c abaut the street aligzament and proposed hausa.ng mxx. Aelmer preferred singX.e fa��.ly ozi the south side af the cul-de-sac. Funk asked why the city r,ould not condemn er��ugh propexty to make a go�d in�ersectian� a su;�;es�tion Iioward ��ecla�ed impraotical. Other possibilities were ciisc�ssed, dnd Howard suggested tabling, sinea the property is not ye� in the city. He would work with the developer in the meantime to r��pr�nd ta the concerns expressed. Kollsas I�OVED tabl�ng of Comprehen�ive Plan Reni.sion CBR 6-81 ta allow staff to work fulther with the applica:t a.n �he light af concerns expreased. Herz�on �econded the motion, r►hich car'ried unani- m�usly. Howard reported ag�nda i�em 5.9 had been cancelled. OLD BUSIN�,SS� *** HoWard called attentlon to the notice of the flood plain/ flood .insurance meeting to be held April g included in the p�ckc�ts� **� Iioward preseni;ed a let�er from the Tiburon Company asking . I MiNUT�s TTG�RD PT,ANNING COMMISSTON Apri1 7, 1981. Page 10 Conditional Use Permit 17-`79, iesusd September 4, 1979 ta construct a dupl�x a� �i855 sw 9is� ave., be extended to allow construction to proceed. It has not been built yet because of lack of funding. Howard suggested approval be granted as xequ�s�ed. Speaker asked what, if any, changes in the area have taken pl.ace that would prompt the r,ommission tn a different_ desieion were the request brought to the commission today. Howard reported there az�e no changes which would have that effeci;. Speaker thereupo:n MOVED that on the basis of no sign.ificant changes in the neighborhood, the commisaion grazit an extension of six months frAm this date for Cond�.tional Use CU 17-79. The motion was seconded by Kolleas and carried unan3.mously. *** Howard repori:ed Bernard Properties has purchased S��tler Park Estates, and have asked for an extension. Howard suggested a sa,x montlas extsnsion, but asked that the commiseion require them to reeubmit the subdivision to the plann.�.ng department sa staff can review requirements and history v1i�h them. Somo thin�e have changed in -�he mean;time, ma}cing staff review wi�h the developer desirable. Speakex MOVED the granting of a si.x mpnths exten�ion o� the Sattler Park Estates subdivision, w9.th the provision the subdivis�.on be sub- mitted tn staff for subdivision revi�w. Kolleas socanded the motion, � whi.ch carried unanimously. � �** Iioward presen�ted the requosb of l�rofessi.onals b00 for an extension of a� condi�ional use f'or •Commercial/Professiona7. use in an � A-12 Multifama.ly Zone. Zn the meantime the ordinance has b.een ch�nged alrid no langer perraits other tY�an mul�ifamily use in that zone. 'Howard i suggestec3 granting an extens3:on for six months; if in that time t.here is n�� subatantial improvements made on the praperty they would have to cc�rae �ack for�camprehene3.ve p],an change to GommerciaZ/Pro£es,�ianal. Fielmer felt the commission had made a mistake when the condit.ional use was granted and that if the nev� owners n�w wanted the rezonir�g, they should ask for a comprehensive plan change. Iie thereupon MOV�D for dgnial of the request for an extension, seconded by �rrens, and carr3.ed unani.mously. The presi.d�nt declared the meetin� ad�ourned at 10:4�. . . � i � � �I , �� y . "PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN—UP SHEET" ' I °�' N�TTCE: ALL PERSpNS DESIR�NG TO SPE.AK ON �1NY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AIVD NOTE TE�IR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEETe � AGENDA ITEM: �. � ACTION REFERENCE: �� "r�jU� v��I�� I �� NAME ADDRDSS � �l.r�� O /t'/ �J�`� SG�/'l�i�'rtl.c� �t�Ci� / � C�'�g�, �7t/r NI � [ � � b f � � �.� ._„ � A�ENDA ITEM:_;�� ACTTON REFERENCE: ��A I�� 1�?�v(� ��'�'1�I U0�/`T y'�''�� NAME ADD�tES5 4'/� c� �l� . '4'OCY � I �' "� �2�� s.��t. ��J s,��r- �,�Uz� � AGENDA ITF.M: , �j ACTION RE�'�RENi.E: , � � �� f C � _�.z_______ .��L P 8 �� /� � � NAME ADDRESS �/ . � - � l 7 -� � . . ^ D � � �=.�, . . � ` . .�,_. _ . ,., .._ ,. ., _ �:_ .._ ... f... P "'PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET" r^._ � NOTICE: ALL PERSO�TS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND NOTE THEIR AL�DRE5S ON THI5 SHEET. AGENDA ITEM: �� ACTION REFERENCE: _�jU ?j rgI �,/��'��tCQj N � ADDRESS Q �'l�-�r � � AGENDA ITEM: ,�� ACTION REFEF2ENCE: G ��, � � ��/�`,�o v�� C�,1 J NAME ADDJ.2ESS ( C� � �' ft � , k � . �' S W �. 4 i AGENDA ITEM:�� ACTION REFERENCE: _G��<��rD Yv NAME ADDRESS , -.�J CS U V ��`�ts�---` �� '� S,Ll.). �ZR1.11 S �iL l�„Q 1�(� � . I�i . i �. �. . _ _ . _ ,.: _ ;: : a , _. _ _ _ __ _ _ . . . _ . � °'PLANIVING COMMISSION SIGN—UP SHEET" ' �`' NOTICE: ALL PERSOtJS DESII2ING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MU5T SIGN THEIR NAME AND NOTE TFIETR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGENDA TTEM: 'J�• 7 ACTION REFERENCE: N �1!/ � �G�^ � � NAME ,ADDRESS AGENDA STEM: ,�' � ACTION REFERENCE; G p�- lO '�A� � 1 V��S' f��C NAME ADD�ESS �� h� � _ �� „N �^��.._ ...� L �'(,_._ '"— � � � �' t � (� �./ t/"—Qd�-z�—�- - 7U � C,(,� G - I'�, • ' i � s AGENDA ITEM: ACTION REFERENCEe ' NAME ADDRESS , � _ � � . �� ;,. ~ ' �% ORICrttelf� C��/1�1�" '(,¢_. � � � � O CITY UT� TIGARD, OR�C�ON ORD I�IANCE DTG. 81� A:V ORDINANCE At�'z1DIrdG CHAPT.ER 1£S.5b OF Ti�iE TIGARD 2�1[JNICIPAL CODE, RELA7."ING TO PLANNED DEVEI�OPI�NT UISTRICT (P-D) TH� CITY OF TIGARD ORAAZ*75 AS FOLLOtaS: SECTYON Iz Tha[ SecCion 13.56 of the T.igard Municipal Cocte be add�d, to to read as � �ollows. "S�E: �XI3'f.}3IT A" SECTION 2� Inasmuch as it is necessary to the peace, llealth, and safety of �� the publi.c that �he f.orgoing change in the City's records become effcctive, an emerY,ency is hereby declared ta exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its passa�e by the Council �.nd app�cnval by the 1•4ayor. PASS�D: By vote oE a11 Council members present this � day of � , 1981 a.€ter bei.n� read � two times by nuntber and �itle only. ;u., . RecArder - City of Ti;ardu� ' APPROV�D: By t1zE �fayor t?�i.s day of �, 1981. � I%�aynr - City o£Tigazd f - ; �. ` : � I . , . . . I ORDIIZANCE N0. 81— II zoa �,ao�� i . . . . . ;. � _ � _ , , .� i �+ ` � � � tidM�I4� � ----- ._ . .. ... — _ . --'� ---------- . . . . �I FXHIBIT ��A�� `' i! � ��. There is hereby aclded to the Municipal Code af the City of Tigard, Oregon, Section "` 1$.56.Q20(C): �' �. " (10,) A descri�tion of proposed deviations from ttie standards t prescribed by this title and deviations from the requir.ements aad � standards of Title 17 of this code, wiCh a showing that the pablic lealth, sufeCy and welfare will be. betCer served by such } proposal." � . � � fi� and to. 5ection 18.56.030 (a): ;; .. .by the Preliminary Review approval.. "A11 deviations or variances from the standards prescr.ibed by this title and in particular, in ;' . ._ _._ - � �,,,, _ �,:..,..a.-ti-:....�-,�-w.� p"ci ic:'�er s",a'L�"eVia ious or variances ro�iV� st�a�n�`ards'a'nc'�'�'��°°"' � � specificati.ons and requirements of Title 17, oF this code, ��hicll !j are bsin� proposed to be varied from, shal:l be addres�.ed in writing � with a showin� that the public health, safety and welfare will be � best servPd by such proposal." � and to Sectivn 1�.56.040(a) : � , i " (5) That each and every �roposed cleviation or variance from srandards, � �pecif'a.cations and requirements prescribed hy tYiis .title, and in particular �i.ttz respect to such deviations or variances fram the standard specificatioi�s and requirements of. Ti.tle 17 of th.is code, are f.ull.y justif.i��i. and that the public health, safety and welfare and general environmental co.nsiderations wi.11 be b�st served by approval thereof.. . • . . >t'�" ,-��: ; �� a ,'k ;^ . r r: `4i �.'' t� . �G. � }��y; .r� 1,��S. , �5" wc � . . �-�1�f., _,,� +'a.. tF.� • ,,.t .,.r.r.: r!3, z.r :,� �? t. . � ' -�{ �X' ��+ ��, � . , � . � ;� ,:,�k. . ' � .. ' � . � � ��Q�� . � - . ' � . . � . � . . '1�+ . �� , - . � � . , � � .�- .��-. ; N ' � . . . � t^• lY'. } .. .. . ' ' � ,ii�b�i; '�. � ' . ., ' �' � � , �. . , . ' ' • . ' •. �::: ' �� -, �.., -�.• '4RllTI3ANCE $1- � ;z �OA 7-f30A _ . . . ,� �� %��:.Paqe 2 �, .. . • t ' i; � ' }�,, �„' �:,# � � , . _ . . , . � . • , , ,.: . , . . . x�!� 1» ' , -.. . . i . . . .�.r , . T ..�. 15�� ' '� � . .. ... . . .. . . � .. . . .. . � . . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. F'{)WZER JUIVI�R HTGH - LEC'TURE ROOM 10:865 SW Walnut Street, Tigar.d NO SUBMISSICIN OF ADDTTIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE 1'UBLIC HFARING UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS R�QtTE5TEI3 TO DO SO. SfTOULD THTS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNT2L THE FOLLOWINC HEARTNG. DOCKET: COMPREHENSI�,IE PLAN REV�ISION, CPR 3-81 (ANGELYNN/HAMREUS) NPO #2 APPLICANT: Calvin Hamreus OWNER: Leon Bruneau and Michael Mahon 5075 SW Main 12435 SW Walnut Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Tigard, Oregon 972?.3 REQUEST: For a re-hearing of a request for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard I2-7 "9ingle Family Residential" to A-12 "Multifamily Residential". STTE LOCATION: All lots surrounding SW Arigel F�l.ace (r�ashington County Tax Map 1S1 35DC, Tax Lats 2401, ''.ti02, �930, 40U0) PREVIOUS ACTION: On June $, 1978, the Planning Director approved az� eight(8) lot subdivision on 2.28 acres. On October 3, 1978, a condition of the previous approval was amended (reference letter to applicant dated October 16, 1978 attached) . The Planning Commission tabled the re quest for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard R�7 "Single Family Residential" to • A-12 "Multifamily Residenti.al" March 3, 1981. �'he Planning Commission requested that the applicants work with the develooers to the north and provide an adequate street plan for all vacant parcels in the area. I PLEASE READ ATTACHED STAFF REPORT. I STAFF NARRATIVE: II The developers of the McNieoe single family attached project to the no.rth have I proposed an acceptable street pattern for future development in the area. The Tualatin Kura1 Fire Protection District Fire Marshall and the City of Tigard Public Works Director have recommended adoption of the street plan by the Planning Cemmission. The subdivisian compliance agreement and performance band for public improve- ments to the original subdivision approved June 8, 1978 has expired. As a result, the City can go against the bond and proceed with 'the public improve- ' ments. The owners have been informed of this and their option to v�aaate the entire subdivision including the road. The owners will undergo vacation procedures immediately after a decision is reached by the Planna.ng Commission on this application. The proposed development shows twenty-seven (27) units. As calculated on the March 3, 1981 Staff Report (see attached) twenty-four (24) units is the maximum allowed on 2.28 acres. I l STAFF REPORT i AGENDA 5.3/CPR 3-81 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION APRTL 7, 1981 � Page 2 i I I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: � Staff recommends approval of CPR 3-81 with the following condition; � 1. The apolicants shall vacate the previously approved Angelynn Subdivision as required under ORS 271.080. 2. The P].anning Commission adopt the proposed street p1an as the street plan ; for future development in the area. 3. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review prior to th� issuance of Building Permits. Twenty-four (24) units wi11 be the maximum allowed. 4. Half street improvements to collector street standards shall be made to SW 95th prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. Grading and constructicm plans �or all work in public rights-of-way and all othe r public improvements shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be J submitted to the Public Works Depaxtment review, i 6 xppp A11 ,pub7.ic improvements will requi.re a compliance agreement and must � be {!de�ign) approved by the Public Works D�partment, and must be either (1) fu11y and satisfactorily constructed prior to the recording of any final plat or issuance �f Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City for 100� of the estimated cost thereof prior to the recording of any � final plat, or issuance of Building Permi.ts. r' } � 6. All proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting i� installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department. E�i c'I 7. A11 street and parking areas shall be concrete or asphalt. All sidewalks �:I shall be concrete. t� 8. No Buildin Permits shall be issued until the e y �t g xpiration of the twent (� (20) day appeal period from the date of approval. ;k 4!' t`;. 9. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- �� ment and the minor land parti tian is approved and recorded. r;' i �: 10. Al1 structures developed must meet minimum requirements for Fire and � Life Safety, and Structure Safety Code requirements of the City of Tigard. f: �; 11. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections �� verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. �; �; ;, j � � �„_ _. .. . . . ., .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . � ._ ...:.__ .,.. _:,.�� STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.3/CPR 3-81 �� TIGARD PL.ANNING COMMI5SION I APRTL 7, 1981 � Page 3 ' i 12. No changes will be made to approved plans or speaifications unless formal 'I a licatian is m de to the a ro riat� Cit de artment and ch es are PP a PP P Y P �g approved by that department. Applicati�n for changes wi11 be made in , � writing and shall include applicable drawings� �� I . , ��t ��" J �� Pre ared by Elizabeth Newton App:roved.; Aldie Special Assistant To The Planning Director ning Director _ _ __ _ _ . ., ., + .�:� . _ ' ,�j ' : , . ., : ' • '. , ;,�' I, r� :��.. >.• .. '. :' . . �,V. ' • . �ry�.;• ; �' : , . , . .. , .. :}. •,�; •� ;;;.: • . . . 'j` ' . .. . . .. t . .. .+�M:3'p�li�A Xii.�:�.c.. .}.'•'� . �r.,yl)R.:�i"V;� :�ry} � 'r• i, � r n•.4. .�• . �, Y ��:._v�1 � :I� ! ' - -..� _ � ! . ..: ._ .. �•��:.."v` y'r,�,.*:'t V'. ' :. ' v:: ti. . . .� _+' � � .. ' ..ni• , , . �... , . Y v�.�i:��i�0..i.��t.�:i�-r. '.-: . . ,v� � � ..•�:� .•i.. . . � . . �.f�T,.'.,i.i... . y � £ �i' "L �. �eber Z6, 1978 . ��.� ;� ` '' • �.. • . _ � . ±': .:,..: ..:. , , .:•r:,�:}!a {�',�� ' ,: •; . . .. , • . . . a+'i'._�, . •r�.`,�u-. .. _ • ,..:C _�iN,•�yi►� `• 'a � ,K 'Lva�i��;c �.t`^ r . ' . " � .�.. -'� ' - y'l�,::7 � ' ��;�....'� . ''.'#.t�9 i3�tfa3'i ,& �Os"i �1"tllt�ilt'#t . . , , . . , r•:'°��:: �. 1i.+��.F1r3 .�"t.Tl�. ��I.Z3:3� . '' ';;,�?, :iy�, t?�. 37a23 � . �. ' ; , . . . ., ,_. ., _�.....,�. '` .�..,.x,,...�._..,...,...,.,.-, �: � 4-?3 �.. „ , . . . . . � • ..: t;: _ -..;: .. . • . � �entieiaea: � Flea�s bs advi�ec2 �st on OC�aber .�, ��'i d$ y�u� requ�s� for , �' �i�Lii�i�.�� l.�1I- ��n�f 4��w .X1 .r�6 Q!�w�.:i.ay�� w�1..w f +�..+.w..�.�n,.�....h.._1'u..�.. ilw.sy , V •wwV4�-�A. v+. af►*uru.fr.r a+.�.tir.t �vs�fy a.VYVN ru� b+.►�s . �?�n�.�.ar Directvr oz� �7�� 8, 1�7�; Q:� � '��?� acrs �sarc�� n 3 t'.-? "S�.zg.L�: I'�ar,z3.�,;� �',+��cic��tia�.a z�n� at sev#. ��t�.�a ��+�a��, ` n�r� o� S.'s�. Co�^.�riarca.a�. .3 trsot ws� ��zovacl suY�jerrt� to � • �c31o�r��, cc��aitio�. . . ; l. iaa� �� cte�elop�� er,.tex �t�� ;� �c,xe�:�t �czc��tsbl� . ' ��c2 3t,af�, ;a;a��e�iric� � �ta�-�� i�],�E s�re�t i��rov�- i` 9YL'3ut w4 �v° 3t�d:i� 'rL'+ �.£,^i43�. :ti��'�tid'� Sir111:��i."�t,''Jr �A +�C.' �R13ti� , a3.cns� 5.1:. �� fAcaa .ta� �ta��:��a�t ��c+�s�y l� . �� YA1 �V� ��V Y rQ W��M Y1V��G�R M' d.�M�i� .� '�r . �� c3 t�� t� » 1� r ' � � 2ot a��Ie �lSC�al II�{t��i2� �4 ta� .s�G.tze� X�y.�aaadi.�q +as �`; oti�as a��u:i�y ��ceg�� ►y 3��.��6 , ; �` ' �f �a +:aa kra .o� 3ny ��:�.^^t�� ,�€�s�.a�r.v�r e�.��;�� or�r��- #�asitat� � j� t4a �cz��:.�ct t�i� �o��:.c� �;t .63.�--��.7�. , . . . . (. . . . . , ��S3co��3y, . . � . �" . , ;. � �,; f G,; ' . . },,. �C�i1 Sal�y . , . , , . � � A=srrvia� C3ty�pZar.tac� . . . . . . ., . . . � �' � � . � � ..�.,�,. K9=+d�► . . . . . : ,.�. ' � ._ ��. t , ttat �ic�j�d t� .��3��.cla �ri�iia. . . . . .. .. . . � _ : :,� � . I�urtfa Etng�ering C`c�. . . . • � ' .. ,�,2,� , Vii�ir�r � ` . . . ?!y }" , , . . . . .. �., �lt t�. �, . . �'� ! ; �!,� . ` , ' � . . . t an� ..n 3 ) A� �Cfia . _ � .^• • • i} � �{ � � ' . . .. .. - . � ' �:', ,.� ' _ ' .� . � .. . • . � � � •1= . r . - :±�'�. . . , .. . ' . . .. . , .. . ... , r��".. . , • . . ' + �, . ' .. '4 E'. , r�i . � . r+ . .. .' �A � .yx, ,Y'' . � • . - . .. ' , , ! t` Y - � t 1 • � � �1 •J 3 �y�� 1 � µ � • .. . . . � � . � �' f7 �� . . . , I , 1 � T4 .`�JS }�;t � Y� 1 f � � � er ' ., • , 1K. tx. . .rt 1�y"'t'` �!� t 1., 4 tt 9�l y S t�}fi .. .. . . . . . ... . .. . . ";t'.��, �''. � . . .. . , . . . . ,, .. . � . � . . _ .... .. . � . 5TAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2/CPR 3-8�. TIGARD PLANNING CONiNIISSION MARCH 3. 1981 . Page 2 � 2. The applicant's proposal is �or thirty (30) units on 2.28 acres. With ! the A-12 zoning, twenty-tour {24) uni�ts would 'be the maximum on this site: 12 units x 2.28 aares = 27.36 units less 25$ for puY�lic improvements. . � 2.28 x .25 = 1.71 'x 12 = 24 unitse In the appli.can�os Narrative, an � increase o� ten (1.0�) percent in density was assumed� Z"he ten (10$) � percent in density can be allow�d in a Planned Development (PD) . 'I'tae applicant has r►ot requested a PD. A PD is encouraged on faur {g;) or mare � acres or when the City asks for land dedication ia�her than for street) . � A PD is not necessary for this site and there£ore no ten (10$) percent � dsnsity bantxs can be considered. � a Y 3. SW 95th is designated a minor co�Llector requiring sixty (60') feet fo:r � right-of-way. . � � 4. �Sewer and water are available �o the site� � � �. STAFF' RECAMMENDAT�(JN: �' . f, �I Staff recommends �enial of C�R 3-$1 an�1 requests the agplican.t bring in a � pxop�sal which considers surrounc�ing vacant parceTs, par�icularly to the '{ west ana nox�th relati.ve to public street access. �'he app�.zcant �ha�� a1s� � consider �he underlying zane requested when fic�u�ing the number of units. �. Ao �$�� l� red by El�z�e h A. Newton Approve rd Special AsSistan� 7[b The P].anning Direetor Plaxina.ng Di,xect ""r�°`` �'� �l C�, Pv � €:. i;� $4? Ir ��' . � {; • �! ' . . . . . � . . �4 H �i � � � . .. � � . !j � . . . . � � � � � �, �. � - � �. . i . � . �� •'�`J�,.i t, ' 4 5TAr� REI�ORT l, AGENIJA 5.2 E '.CIGART3 PLANNSIVG COMMISSInN f M.�RCT% �, �.9a1. - T,30 p.m. � �� 'C1Y7�T.t JUNI01; FiIGFi - I,ECTi��2E 1ZGOM i' 10865 SW Walnu� �t�-ee�t, Tigarc3 ;, ;� r NO SrJx'tI�!!IS�TQI�I 4F �DDI�':�pI�FAI, 1�lATERIAL BY APPLICANT SIiALL BE P^.A:DE i�ri' TF� PCTBLIC �' �ARC�TG LiI3LESS xHE ,�F�LIC:t4I�T IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD T'HIS 0�'(."UR, IINEi�S,,?IJE�S2'EA� 'I'HE T.TEM WILT.� .IiE TI�ALED UNTrL THE �OI�WING FiFARI�TG. i ii DOCK�T: CON�REHENSZ� PLAN REVISION, CPR 3-81 (ANt.�I,YNTT/H�FtEUSy NPO #2 ; C.i APPLICI�N7': �alvin Hamx�:us C7WNER: Leon Bxvneau and Mit;hael Mahan `� 507S SW M�.n 124>5 SW 'Walnu� k3�aver�cn, �JR 9�005 'i'igard, OR. 9 r005 . '.i REQLYF�T: F�� a Com,pxehen�ive Plan Revision fram Ci�y of. °�'igard Rw7 . f'' "Single Fami3� Ftesidential" f:o A-12 "Mul�tifam�.,Yy... Res3.den�ia:�"� SITE Ir�JCA��C�N: All lots surrou�ding SW 11nge1 Ylace (Wash. Ca« Tax biap '1SI 35Cll, Tax LaEs 2401, 2402, 3904, 4000, 4ioo, 4200, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700) �' P2�VIOUS ACTION: On June �, 1978, the P�.axsixi.ng Aix�c�.ar appmved an eight (8a lot subdivisinn on 2.28 aares. �a Oc4o�x 3, I.978r a �onditic�n �f the prevzous a�proval wa� a�nd�d f re�'ex^en�e �' 1et�er to app].icant dated October 16, 1978 a�tached) . !'; i.. FILrTnTNGS OE' FACT: • �j 3.0 �fne site i� presently zaned R-7 "Single Fazai.ly Residential" i�n �cari.foxmance �� w9.th the Ci�y of Tigard's Comp.;rehensive Plane � !,� �. R"kie applic�nt proposes to cons'��uat tk�izty (30) apar�m�nt� t�i3:t�e� (ra�.n�teen i� C'l�} twc� story and eleve„ ('!�� one c*o.r-,� un.i.i:w�_ i� 4. c3u:��..s��yement ` c�r�.�I� ii;te•rin� open space (se� attached map� . �,; 4� 3. Th� t�TPU #2 T?lan d��ignates this area as R-7 "Single Fama.ly Itesiden�ia�,".. ;' 2'�ae pr.operty �ca the west and sauth is zor�ei3 A�20 Urbaa� �iqh Density. � The owners of the praperty to the rrorth have an applicatioaz befo� the j, Planning Caim�ission reques�i�g � Gbnditional Use for• singl.e �fa.ru.ly a�f�a�hed. �j Z"h�xe are single family h�m�s acrass SW 9��h. '�ancjela Court is a small � aingle f.�mil� at�ached subclivxsion to the r��ztheast. � �,' �4� SW 95th Avenrxe is d�sxgnated a niinor collector in the Tigard Comprehensive 1; Streat Plan. r: �; S. Sewex� and wrater ar� availabl.e to the site from SW 95th . �;'. . � �OI3CLtJ5IQNARY FZNDINGS: �; i;'7, 1.. Althauqh the Comp.rehensive Plan and NPO #z Plan designate this property �I �:;i �.s R--7 "Singl:e I'amily R�siEtential", 5taff feels that the request for a Y;; Gonaprehensive Plan Revision to A-12 Urban Medium Density is reasonable. `�I FIowever Staf_f has concerns that this develo ment does not take into �'' . P �;i, account n�hea:x vacant parce].s in the area. Hecause of the large amo�t ti�' uf vacant Zand in the area, Staff would like to consider all dsvelopment 4;'� pxoposed in conjunction with potential development on other sites. The �f' major concern here is an adequate stxec�t r�etwork. �I STAF'F REPORT AGENDA No.5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSIOI3 APRII':, 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.xn. FOWLER JUNTO HIGH - LECTUI2E ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMZSSION OF ADDITIQNAL MATERIAL BY APPL2CANT SHALZ BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARTNG UN.LESS THE 7�PPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCGUR, UN1tEQUESTEA, THE ITEM WTLL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWTNG HEARING. DO(:KET: CONDI'PIONAL USE, CU 3-81 (MC NIECE) NPO #2 APPLICANT: Neil and Victoria McNiece OWNE R: Mrs. Desimone � 9454 SW A1].en Blvd. 11835 SW 95th Ave. Beaverton, OR 97005 Ti gard, OR 97223 RFQUEST: For a re-hearing of a Conditional Use request in an R7 "Single Family Residential" Zone to construct single family attached uni�s. a]CTE LOCATION: 11835 SW 95th Ave. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lat 250Q) PREVIOUS ACTION: On March 3, 1981, the Tigard Planning Commission tabled the Conc�itional Use Request to build single family attached , homes in an R7 "Single Family Residential" Zone. PLEASE READ ATTACHED STAFF REPORT OF MARCH 3, 1981 FOR THIS APPLICATION. N1�,RRATI VE: As a result of the March 3, 1981 Planning Commission, the applicant was required to p.ropose a transportation/street plan for all vacant property in the are a. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Fire Marshall and the Director of Public Works have reviewed the applicant's proposed street plan. The Fire Marshall and Public Works Director are in agreement that the street plan proposed should be adopted by the Planning Commission. Adoption of this plan will ensure an adequate street network for this area in the future. STAFF RECOMMEI�TDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional iJSe, CU 3-81, with the €'ollowing conditions: 1. The Planning Commission adopt the proposed street plan as the stree� plan for future development in the area. 2. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Half street impxovements to collector street standards shall be made to � SW 95th prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. Grading and construction plans for all work in public rights-of-way and all other public improvements shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be submitted to the Public Works Depar�tment review. All public improvem�nts will require a compliance agreement and must be (design) a.pproved by the Public Works Department, and must be either (1) fully and satisfac;torily constructed prior to the recording o� any „:, ,. . _ _ _. , , r STAFF REPORT j � AGENDA No. 5.4/CU 3-81 � TIGAI2D PLANNING COMNIISSION AYRIL 7, 1981 Page 2 i E'< final plat, or issuance of Building permits; or (2) bonded to the City ` { for 100� of the es�imated cost thereof prior to the recording o,f any final p1at, or issuance of Building Permits. � 5. All proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department. 6. All street and parking areas shall be concrete or asphalt. All sidewalks shall be concrete. 7. No Building Permits shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty (20) day appeal period from the date of appr�val. 8. No minor land partitians shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- ment arxd the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 9 All structures developed must meet minimum requirements for Fire and Life Safety, and Structure Safety Code requirements of the City of Tigard. !' 10: No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upan this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections �i verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. `' � �� 11. No changes will be made: to approved plans or specifications unless formal �� appl�.cation is made to the appropriate City department and changes � are approved by �that department. �1pplication for changes will be �`' �'; made in wri�ting and shall include applicable i3rawings. (`' t V� �.; �: r; i�'I i,�l ;i ii r.i `;I 5� f' M1..; � �''. �, ��`�/,�C��'V' ” - '�',; � / Pr ared by EZizabeth Newton Approved by d r- Special Assistant To The Planning Director P1 ng Director � k` � , �,, �; e �; '' �i . V? � e ' STAE'F REPORT � AGENDA 5.5 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 pem, E'OWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM I 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard +, NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAI� MATERIAL BY APPLICANT 5HALL BE MADE AT THE 'I PUBLIC HE � ARING UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ZTEM WILL BE TABLED UN'TIL THE FOLLOWING HEARING. ! DOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 5-81 (GALLOS VINEYARD 127 � �`) NPO #7 ApPLICANT: HERB MOftISSEI'TE BUILDERS OWNER: James & Anna Ga110 7470 SW 76th Avenue C/O HE RB MORISSETTE BUTLDERS Portland, Ore gon 97223 REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard R7 "5ingle Family Residential" to City of Tigard R5 "Single Family Residential" to build single family attached homes. SITE LOCATION: SE corne r of SW Tigard and SW 113th (Washington County Tax Map 1S1 34DC, Tax Lot 2900) I PREVIOUS ACTION: 5ubdivision, S 11-76 and. Subc7ivision, S 21-77 fil.es for Ga11os Vineyard STAFF NARRATIVE: Gallos Vineyard has been with us since 1976. In the final analysis we are at this point because of economics and delays. The applicamt could construct dup lexes on 1000 square foot lots in an R7 Zone un der a Conditional Use granted by the Planning Commission, h ow ever, Staff feels that the Conditianal Use is for one or two units and not for extensive density increases. Hence, this Comprehensive Plan Revision. Staff has reviewed the prelimi.nary plat of �the applican! and has suggested a vacation and re-plat of 113th Avenue, The flag lot aonflgurations are not appropriate. 113th could be re-pla tted as a portion of this suk�division and should continue around t� the west to connect with 113th Place eventually when Mr. Globkee develops the south. The major issue is density. The surrounding property is open to the east, developed R7 to the west, one single family home on a large parcel to the north, and undeveloped to the south, except for one old house just out of the Fanno Creek floodplain. Staff suggests detached single family units on 5000 square foot lots along the western side of 113th and attached units (duplexes) on the eastern side of 113th. This mix would a11ow a reasonable density increase and would not seriously change the character of the area. FINDINGS OF FACT: l. Land pr.esently is under the Comprehansive Plan designation of R7. Change requested to R5. . 2. Sewer and water service are available to the site. .� _ � II STAFF REPORT ji AGENDA 5.5 �, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � �.R�L 7, 1981 ' ' Page 2 �I 3. 113th is gravel an d unimproved. ';I� 4. R7 Zone to the west is fully developed. The impact of attached single � family dwellings proposed could be met if mitigated by the realignment i of 113th and landscaping. 5, 113th wi11 have to be vacated and realigned. CONCLUSIONARY FTNDINGS: 1. Increasing the density by use of commonwall duplex construction is app ropriate on 5000 square foot 1ots. A single family, duplex mix could be used to retain the aharacter of the area. 2. Full street public impxovements to 113th will be made to serve this development and future development to the south will connect to 113th Place. STAFF RECOMMEND�ITION: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Appliaaxxt to petition to vacate 1Z3th and re-plat alignment to serve development. Elimination of the eight (8) proposed driveways to 113th will be accomplished when applicant applys for subdivision review under Chapter 17 of the Code. 2. Re-plat to show separate 5000 square foot lots and commonwall development configuration. Sinqle family to the west, attached units to the east. 3. A nonremonstrance agreem�nt be made a .portion of each deed for each parcel an the plat for the .future improvement of SW Tigard Street. I I 4. Applicant shall apply for subdivision review under Chapter 17 of the II Tigard Municipal Code. � I 5. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon ' this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied an d inspections I, verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. i 6. No changes will be mad� to approved plans or specifications unless formal ' application is made to the appropriate City department and changes I, are app roved by that department. Application for changes will k�e made i in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 'I 7. Grading and construction plans for all work in public rights-of-way I and all other public improvements sha11 be prepared by a registered , professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review. , All public improvements will require a compliance agreement and must be (design) approved by the Public Works Department, a.nd must be either (1) fully and satisfactorily construated prior to the recording of any minor land partitio�, public dedication, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the Gity for 100� of the Pstimated cost thereof prior to th� recording of any minor land partition, public dedication, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits. . s�r�F REPORT AGENDA 5.5 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 7, 1981 Page 3 S. All proposed u�tilities sha11 be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Publ�ic Works Department. 9. A metes and bounds legal descripti.on and map shall accompany a dedication of public rights-of-way, parks, open spaee or floodplain areas ; and shall be prepared by a registered engineer or land surveyor. 10. A City of Tigard approved nonxemonstrance agreement must be recorded by Washingtari County and returned to the City of Tigard Planning Department before issuance of Building Permits or change of property ownership. 11. All street and parking are as shall be aoncrete or asphalt. All sidewa:lks shall be concrete. 12. Na minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the C.i.ty of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. i ward P ning Director � I � � � STAFF REPORT I AGENDA 5. 6 � TIG.ARD PL'ANNTNG COMMISSION � APRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. � FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM � 10865 SW Walnut Stieet, Tigard � ��i llOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-81 (HAMPTON STREET) NPO #4 tj ii APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD AND 1VP0 #4 MEMBE RiHIP �i �; ?s REQUEST: For a Comprehensive P1an Revision for certain parcels ;; of land abutting SW Hampton Street in the NPO #4 Plan area �' from Washington County T�U-4 to City of Tigard CP "Commecial 'l Professional". �i �; LOCATIUN: On Hampton Street between 70th and 72nd (Wash. Co. Tax Map ''1 2S1 lAC, Tax Lots 1100, 1200, 1300) . At this time, Lot '' 1100 is inside the City. 1200 and 1300 are unincorporated areas of Washington County. ;� FINDTNGS OF FACT: t:. 1. At the present time, these parcels are designated Protected/Residential � R-7 '"Single Family Residential" on the Comprehensive Plan and are included j';: in Canversion Unit #5. ��E �a �;;; ;.; 2. The adopted NPO #4 Plan states: "In the Triangle, the most viable residential k.3; are as have been identified and am slated for protection until 75� of !i the owner occupants elect to allow th�ir "conversion unit" fio be �� redeveloped according to the uses specified on the Plan Map. The convexsion �'„ units are also delineated on the Plan Map." A'` 3. The NPO #4 membership passed the following motion at their meeting an i;;. Pebruary 4, 1981: `" �; "That a Comprehensive Plan Change be initiated by City Staff to change � the Zone from R-7 Prot�c�tec� Single Family Residential to Commercial Professional for those lots abutting H�mpton which shall be designated !?< by the Lot and Map #2S1 lAC, 1100, 1200, 1300 and that at the Site Design � I Review level berms sha11 be added to the north of the E``; , properties an d k that no varianae to the 35 foat heiqht limitation shall be allowed. " +' �,," �,, ,•, 4• This request is logical considering that Commercial Professional development �^ has taken place at the corner of Hampton and 72nd Avenue, Tax Lots �,I; 1400 and 1500. The pr3mary concern is to protect the residential area t ' abutting Gonzaga Street. Note the NPO Motion concerning Site Design � " Review criteria. #� �� " CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: �i �. y,;;. 1. To comply with the wishes of the citizens �aho drafted the NPO #4 plan, it i<;; seems logical that this request be granted. �i;� � ;;, �,;_�, , a��l STAFF REPORT AGENnA 5, 6 /CP� 4�81 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 STAFF RECOMNIEND,ATION: Sta�� recozr�mends approyal of this Co,m�rehensi�re Plarx Revision. � Pl ' g Directox r i' . . . - � . . . � . � i ' _ . . . _ . . . .._-'-'.--� --"'_"^^"°'�'.'^_.._..---.--.— —.._.— �__._.-�_._ -.-.�.-_--._� _... � ti t „ I ` . !' . .. . . . , . . . . .; ..� . G��. y .� 1�, , . � . � � � . � � . �.-s t,.! �c �. �� . _ . '�i INt71�L p01NT , • ' ' IOO� I4��Q�,'��3�• . � 2C • � N e9° 09"E 'b4.03 � /� �� 1�2.03 �t� 20 ' '�`��y%�'..ti��Ci,3,�.�'� ///If�''.!!��%�A�I�l7A%i��/'G��/y////:G �%�%' ��/�'/.�1'/./ ,✓1��r�'.�'��.'!��.�\ (Q0 30 Sir GO y ,�,�/G,600 �� 400 .304 � .36Ac. � STRE�T • N • � � - +1�YS�.flr�'�'_..;�..$ �►�..':,�....J Q: �� V , . . f :� . Q 7 � . �. n . .. . '9 -...___- � `{� � �� „p � O � f • G �� = � �a ' � g I > ± ��1 �� . r• ,.� r'� r.� �n �� J = `f '_� _ 'J �: N 89°OS�E '• r � � , 109.A6 � 11 .03 . ., �n4 .y . _ _ U0.0 . ... .•v,v�r��.,�, ,u',w4��:�,J-:a-....;>- - ',....:r:.�,��;,�r �� ! ..�/) .�%%f//�/��i.uwvn�.. ......r�,�-#:r4'�r�°. - � li 4.[4 . � (TO PUBLiC 01T-43) . � �R. ' �� W (� A ZZ� ST R E E� � � , � o -:-�� .,,�f„ � � , ,�s.00 �is.00 � i re.o0 200 ��s.a ��o.00 i I (000 �; . � '1 1 900 � o � .35Ac. 70a a� . ; 1 ' � r°� � o � � � '"1 o I 5 �'t 1 6 0 0 c � '� � �� u I� a � � 'R�O . n� W ,- o "' u � � � . � ° � �►= � ^> ' � a ;; � !!f \ � r ,\l r � i � ,a 'W � ; �97: �i>i/irvi�: . //.:::i»� � .� a n ��"� E � �' 119.3S ^ 105.91 �� '�� ': � � � ' N S9°OS�E oN 8'9°O��E � � I I.J � . � � � ,� 1 {iO4. 1 0 { W� ; � ►� `�t�. ��O � " � � �a ` � SEE MA ( ` �0 • °r� ��' ,;. , 7 � 2S 1. 1 A ' 21 �I 20 � c3 � o .. � � ( f- -� � " - . • . � � .' � . i • � ,�� ;, .. I I= .��i� ��, , �� ii�. /// � ir . � � �� + �p-�t -� � � � � HAMF'TON .�,.9. STREET. . � '� � � �. VU. ' I . �' i�,STREET j � � � : .:� � �. � � I . � ; :. . ' . -, O ..� i 1 N . � i�oo � . . , . I� i r,,, 4.69 Ac. . I ' • , • i � , • • . • ♦2 s---- ",.: . . , ' j � � r� � � , ' . �^ � R � i, � ,� n / .. . : ) F _ • ' . ;, : i ' .F �0 '. • . , • • . . ... . ' . , . 1 f '. , y � ' . , I . . ' , ' . • �_ , I � •� � /'�� 1 ' . � .` I . . . , � ' . , ; ' . i. • . � � .. • ,I� � � .. � . • \ _ . ' . . ._. . � - ' 1 . , . . �.. _.. ,. ., . ,._....,_ �r"= .. . , . . ._ .. „ .._... .,:.:. .. . .:�___,. _.�:---- STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.7 TIGARD PLANNING COMMTSSION APRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE RO(�M 10865 SW Wa'lnut Street, Tigard NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLE5S THE APPLICANT 25 REQUESTED TO DO SO. SfIOULD THTS OCCUR, UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HEARING. DOCKET: ZONE CfiANGE, ZC 5-81 (DUNHAM COMPANY RU4 to CP) NPO #4 APPLICANT:� Gary Dunham OWNERo S.'�ME 4730 SW Macadam Portland, Oregoai 97201 REQUEST: For a Zone Change from Washington County RU-4 to City �f ' 1 Tigard Comprehensive Plan designation, CP "Com�ercial Professi�nal". STTE LOCATION: 66th Ave. and Gonzaga Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 lAD, Tax Lots 100, 200, 600, 700) PREVIOUS ACTTON: NONE FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Z'he applicant's request is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation. � 2. SW 67th from Ham,pton to Franklin is substandard, gravel construction. 3. Sewer service and water are available to the site. ' t. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: II 1. The proposed zon�,ng is compatible with other uses in the area and conforms to the Comprehensive P1an designation in NPO #4. i F. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: �,:I Staff recoznmends approyal of Zone Change, ZC 5�81 with the �ollowing conditions: II iI 4�;;i 1. A7.1 development shall be subject to Site Design R�view. � ' 2. A vacation proceeding for a portion of 67th Avenue may take place. (See �;'� applicant's naxrati,ve page 6 - paragraph 7) . The Public Works Director �?'' sha11 review a11 pub7,ic imp,�ovements as a portion of Site Design Review. (;;' f:`? 3. No Occupancy Permits sha11 be,issued un,til all conditions placed upon I'`� this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections + verifying this have been c�rried out by the appropriate depaxtment. � ': �'�� (::'�;: 1`','�: z,. �4�,��,s.. 4�J �C . . . . ..._._..._ .._ . ... .. .. . . .. . . _. . .. . . ... . .._ .__ __.... .__... .... .... _._...... . �r1 � i . � STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.7/ZC 5-81 TIGARD PLANNING COMMTSSION� � APRIL 7, 1981 Page 2 . 4. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal � . a 1' . -T pp icata.on is made to fihe appro�riate Cit� department and c,ian�es i are approved by that de�artment. A��lication for changes w311 be � made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. • , � � . i 5. Grading and construction pla�ns for all work in nublic rights-of-way ' { atad all other public im�rovements shall be prepared by a registered � pxofessional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be ! subanitted to the Pub: ic Works Department for review. • E , Eul public improvements wi11 require a �ompliance Agreement anfl must i be (desi,n) approved by the Pubi.ic Works Department, and must be either 4 (1) fully and satisfactorily constructed prior to the recording of any � minor land partition, public ded.ication, final plant, or issuance of i Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City far 1�Q$ of the estima�ed � cost th�reof prior to the recoxding of any minor land partition, public E �edication, final olat, or issuance of Building Permits. � I 6• All proposed utilities shall be pla�ced undergrownd. Street lighting � a.nstallations shall be app roved by the Public Works Department. � �f; 7. A metes and bounds lec�al description and map shall accompany a dedication of publia rights-of-way, parks, o�en space or floodolain are as and . shall be �repared by a registere d engineer or lar�d surveyorer. 8• All street�axid parking areas shall be concrete or as�halt. A,11 sidewalks shall be concrete. . r die P ing Di�:�ector �,. _ ...,�._,_ _.,._. . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.8 TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMIS5ION 1�PRIL 7, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. FOWL�R JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 S W Walnut Street, Tigard ` � , NO SUBMTSSION OF ADDxTIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD TIiI5 OCCUR, UI3�i.EQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWZNG FiEARING. ! ' i DOCKE T: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 6-81 (BONITA PARK/CHATTERLEY R7 to IL5 Plan Revision) NPO #5 APPLICANT: Jim L. Chatterley OWNER: SAME 29910 SW Ladd Hill Road Sherwood, Oregon 97140 '��i REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard R7 "Single Fami.ly R�sidential" to R5 "Single Family Residential" on 1.8 acres at the corner of 79th Avenue and Bonita Road. Applicant wishes to construct four (4) attached single family units and two (2) detached single family units on the site, LOCATZON: 14575 SW 79th (GVash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12B, Tax Lot 4000) FINDINGS OF FACT: �; ;, 1. Property should be annexed to the City by June 1981. Petitions/Resolution ; wi11 be delivered to the Boundar Commission for their May 7, 1981 �' � �. meeting. If this request is granted, 5taff would prepare an ordinance � for the Council indicating said action and assigning an R5 Zone to this Parcel. � 4 2. The Robert Randall Company will soon develop the parcel of land directly i � to the north across Bonita. Z'he alignment of 79th Avenue has been resolved. ; The Comprehensive Transportation plan for the area including Colony G Creek, Waverly Meadows, and Randall's parcel has been altered to necess.itate r a dec�iGation of 1an d from this parcel to align 79th to the north. ` l�pplicant is aware of this situation. • � 3. Boni�a Road is substandard. A nonremonstrance agreement for each parcel � s sha11 be recorded/macle a part of the final plat agreeing to future V improvements to Bonita. A five (5') foot dedication along Bonita shall ' be required. �. 1 4. SW 79th Avenue is substandard. Half street improvements shall be required. � A ten (10') foot dedication along full 79th frontage shall be required. � ' S. The present Compxehensive Plan designation is R7 "5ingle Family Residential". � A duplex i.s allowed as a Conditional Use on 10,000 square feet under the � Cade. Applioant is requesting four (4) duplex units. It is the feeling of Staff that a Conditional Use should not be used to "substantially" incre ase densities, therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Revision has been � requested �or eight (8) , 5,000 square foot lots and two (2) lots of � approximately 7,500 square feet each, � 6. Sewer service can be provided from the north. Water is presently � available to this site. AGENDA 5.8/CFR 6-81 Page 2 CUNCLUSIONARY FINDTNGS: 1. An incre ase in density along Bonita Road is appropriate. 2. Public improvements wi11 be made on 79th to align to the north. 3. Public services are available. STAFF RECON�[N�NDAT20N: Staff recommends approval of this Comprehensiv� Plan Re�ision for Bonita Park/Chatterley wi�th the following conditions: 1. Chapter 17 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be adhered to concerning this subdivision. Applicant shall apply for subdivision review. 2, Following annexation, the adopting/accepting ordinance shall be prepared to reflect Comp:rehensive Plan designation R5. (Staff to prepare documents.) 3. A nonremonstrance agreement shall be made a part of the final plat for each lot agreeing to the future impxovements to Bonita Road. A fi.ve (5') foot dedication along the north property line shall be made to the City. 4. Half street improvements sha11 be made to local street standards along the entire eastern boundary of this property. 5. A detailed plan showing the realignment of 79th with the Randall property to the north shall be submitted to the Public Works Director for review. Necessary de dications of land �to facilitate this realignment sha17. be made. 6. A site obscuring �ence shall be installed along Bonita Road anr3 adequa�te landscaping shall be used to buffex the dwelling units from the traffio on Bonita. Plan to be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 7. No Occupancy �ermits sha11 be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. 8. No changes will be made to appraved plands or sg�ecifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Appl.ication for ahanges will be made in writin� anc3 shall include applicaMle drawings. 9. Grading and construction plans for all work in public rights-of-way and all other public improvements shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City standards, an.d shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review. � ublic ' o e nts ill e i o I� A11 p .�mpr v me w r qu re a C mpla,ance Agreement and must i be (design) approved by the Public Works Department, and must be either (1) fu11y an,d satisfactorily constructed prior to the recording of any minor land partition, public de dication, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City for 100� of the estimated cost thereof prior to the recording of any minor land partition, public dedi,cation, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits. 10. All p roposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street l�ghting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department. �- . ; _ y AGENDA 5�8/CPR 6-81 Page 3 11. A metes and boun�3s legal description and map shall accompany a dedication of public rights-of-way, parks, open space or floodplain areas and sha11 be prepared by a registered engineer or land surveyor. 12. A City of Tigard approved nonremonstrance agreement must be recorded by Washington County and returned to the City of Tigard Planning Departmen�t b�fore issuance of Building Permits ox change of property ownership. 13. Al1 street and parking areas shall be concrete or asPhalt. All sidewalks shall be concrete. 14. No Building Permits shall be issued until. the expir.ation of the twenty (20) day appeal period from the da�te of approval. 15. No minor land partitions shall. be made in reference to this p.roject , unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. Aldie How Pl g Directar . ' ' � J� L... Chatterley 1 2qy;.o s, w, za.aa xi�. xa. ' Sherwooa, oR 97140 � March i1, 1981 Mr. A. �ioward City of Tigard , Planning Department 1.21+20 S. W. Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 �� Reference: Proposed Subdivision - Bonita Park I Conditional Use Application � Mr. Howard, On March 6, i981, we submitted a subdivisioz� application for l.8 acres located @ the corner of S. W. Bonita and 79th Ave. We were instructed tn prepare a conditional use application to a11ow the subdivisiari to iz�cludc; lots designed for duplex construction in the proposed R-7 zoning. The purpose af' this request is to develope duplex units in an area where the property will be annexed to �the city as R-7 zoning. We anticipate an advantage to the public by providing buildable lots of an incxeased density, , thus less expensive housing costs. After some reseaz•ch with various real estate companies in the area, we find there is a demand for duplex or common- i� wall lots in the City of Tigard. : Based upon the cul-de-sac scheme we do not anticipate any r.omplications with public services or utility access. , It should be noted that the increased density can be justified based upon 4 the faLl.owing; , . l. Bonita Road is a main arterial route through the axea, which provides access to the several existi..ng multi-family units in the area. 2. The City has already approved a devel.npment for Robert Randal (b. immediately across Bonita Road from our development, which wi11 include a se.rif-:: of common-wall units. . We anticipate tha� the cond3tional use hearing can be scheduled concurrently w3�;h •hh.e annexat�.on process to mi�imize any �ielays for a responsive decision. r ' �i � ' Nlarck� 11, 1981 � , Mr. A. Howard Page 2 , � I I Included with this letter we are submitting the following itezns: I l. 6 additianal copies of a preliminary Plat showing thP exi.sting . r.ontau•rs. 2. Qne copy of the current warrenty deed showing Jimmie. I�. & Rita Cha�terley as the property awners. 3. Two copies of the si.gneci conditional use applicatian �'ax�m. 4. A persona'l check �'or $125..00 to cover. the applicati.on fee. � Shoul;i there be any addi�i�nal questions or i.n�'ormation require.d, please , call, office 2�+1-7013. Very t.ruly yours, e,\ �_.,._._.GG /��/� /�_. � � . ��i-.;,�,�lc r J(�/LC�LL � � ��-[ , � / J�m L. Chatterley �I '�