The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 07/08/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. � l l,,; � � � ��.�:; f.;`' � AGENDA ' � TTGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � ' July 8, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. ; : TZGARD SCHOOL DI5TRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARU ROOM 1313% SW Pacific Highway, Tigard i�: F , 1. Open Maeting, ' � 2. Ro1;1 Ca11: 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting: 4. Planning Commission Communications: 5. Public Hearing: A. Staf.f Report . B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public �estimony 1. Proponent's 2. Opponent's 3. Cross-Examinatzon - enter Edens NPO # 6 8 Durham Hall Business C ) 9 0 L USE CU I 5.1 CONDITIONA , � 5.2 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 5-72 (Summerfield) NPO #6 t �3 5.3 VARIANCE, V 6-80 (Dennis O'Neel) NPO #2 i 5.4 VAR2ANCE, V 7-80 (Bruce Clark) NPO #3 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELORMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 1-80 (Copper Creek) NPO #6 5.6 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEUELOPMENT DISTRTCT, ZCPD 13-80 and SENSITIVE s LANDS PERMTT, M 3-80 (ICittleson/Brown.) NPO #5 � ; 6. Old Business: � i 7. New Business: 8. Other Business: 9. Adjournment .� MIN'UTES ' TIGARD PLANNING COMNlISSION ,"� �u1y 8, i9�o . 7:3o p,�n. Ti�ard School n�.strict Administration Offices - Board Room 1313? S�! Paca.fic Iiightray, Tigard, Oregon President Tepedino OPFNED the meeting at 7:35. xoLr, car�.: _._._ Preaentt Bonn, Funk, Aelmer, Herron, Kol,le�s, Satith� Speaker, Tepedino Absent: Donal@ Moen Staff; Soward The MINtrTES of the Juno � meetia�g wer� eonsidered, and on mo�ion of Speaker, seconded by Helmer, were approved a$ submitted. Under COt�ItTNICATIONS� President Te�edino turned over to ataff a paaket of materi�l received from the Distr3.ct �orps of Engine�rs. I�t is i:he long-�taaited atudy of Fanno Creek and ixs tributarips, indicating the lA0 year flaod elevationa along tbe s�ream. Yxesident Tepedino also referred ta the provis�.ox�s of the Tigard Muni.cipal Code pertainin� ta the choosing of a pxes�.dent, v�ca pras�.dent and secretary, sugges�tin,g after the public .hear�ngs the commission coneider the aelection of a nerr presidenti. He felt tvo �raars was long en�ugfl for him to seree, and that sar�eone else ehou].d be elected to t.his position. '; ; �he president r�ad the usual n,atice of aut,hori.�y ifor and procedrzre to be fol�.ot►ed in the me�tin�, and o�enad the ' , �BLIG H,EAItTN;Qr5 g6rtion of the meeting. 5.1 CONATTIONAL IISE, CU 9-$U (Tlurham I�aZI Buei.ness Lfenter/Edans) NPO ;��5 ' A request for a Condit�onal. Uae in an M�4 '�jndustrial Park Zot�.e�+ far an auto repair facility located at 16285 SW �5th Avenue (INash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lot �100). Howard read the �TAFF REPORT and 12ECOl�iMENDATIONS. (Commissioner Smith arrived at this point.) George Edens, 30g lOth Stree�, Lake Oeweg4, o�rner ot �he Durham �iall Busi.nese Center, mac��e a brief ,(LPPLICANT�S PRBSEI�iTATION. ' There wa,� no PQBLIC TESTIMONY. .�.,....�....N_...� speai�ex 3,nquired ti.he means his tenant expect�d to use in the �'ay o� advertis�.z�g, since h�.s �hop'�.1s off the bea�en track; alao if h�.s r;; ,_ ,;, ;' . . �,': ;'! . � � � � � :�.�:'r:': � � � � . . . . . �'�.;. �� _ . . .. . » . . . � . . . . .. , _4�� ' � � . . . . ... . . . ...�. � . .. . . __. _ MINU TES � '1'IGAItD I�LANNING COI�iTSSIO'N �I��i July 8� 1930 Page 2 tenant corzld live with the prohibitio� on outside parking. Eden s�ated he could accommodate four cars in the build�.ng, and there are three :.,; outside parking spaces avaiZ�ble. Funk raised the question of security from vandalism, in light of proximity to tho high school. Smith seriously queationed �hether such a business could op�rate vexy succesefully �3.th � only that limited storage capacity, but it was pointed aut thie and the liability wero pointed out to the prospective tenant, who seemed eatisf3.ed nevertheless. COMMISSION DTSCUSSION AIdD ACTION: Koll,eas MtJVED approval of .�.._..�..... ....._�........ ...... _.�.. _��...., Cond3tional Use CII 9•80, bas�d on staff findings and ^recommendatione. The motiott v�as seconded by HeZraer and passed unan�.mously. 5•z ZC)NE CHANC��, ZC 5-�72 (Summerfield) NPO �6 A xequest by Idaymond J. Bartel, Alli, Arch�.tect and Planner, for reapprai,sal of approvod �enant mix for Swumerfi.el.d Commercial Center located at Pacific Highrray and Durh�m Road. Hamard gane a history o� the pro�ect, and �numerated chan�es w'hiah have taken place sin�e initial a�proval same years ago. The applicant as�.� tha retai.l-commera�.al ratio �be changed from y.o/Go� to 60/40�. f � �he APPLTCANT�S PRF;SE�IT�ATION was made by �2aymond �T. Bartel, � r:�rchitect for the pra�ec�C, 2515 SE Harrison, Milwauki.e. He �oresented � a t�o�page taand��at t� fo�.?-c�w du�c�r�,g his presentation, and �assed � ' around some up-to�date photographs of the pro�ect. He rc�ported the 'I 60••40 retail-cosnmercial mix appe�ared m�o�e practical in today•s market. He reported on a traftic s�itdy by CH2M-H111 indicating the transporta� tion sysCem to be very adequate for th3.s propos�d mix, and anothar (Rhich he �ave to the stafF) indiaat�.ng that even if the Center rere 100y6 retail, the only modi.fica�3.oa rrhich might be necessary to .handle the traffic would be a trafiic si�nal at Durham Raad and Summerfield �T1V@• i� There was no PUBLIC T�ST�ONY. �I There rras aonsiderable di,scnssion among eta�'f, Bartel, and some commiasioner� prompted by the introduction cf the study o� the traific impact i� t.he Center xere 100� retail. Stati ob�ected to approving any greater reta�l pez�centage than tt�ey had asked For. FIe felt there e e aeent an ret 1 is c�nsi��ra��l• vacancy in •fiic• s�ac at th px , d a9. a�pace, especially in thie area, is relativ.ely eaay to rent; therefore he eacpects virtuaZly 100� retafl occnpanc,y before long. He ob�ected ; to i.ncrea�ing the reta3,1 ,percentage beyand nhat wae ael�ed for �rithaut � another application to the Planning Come�.ssion. Further di,scuselon on ' x c � i F i � MINU`I'�S i TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSSON July 8, 19$0 Page 3 'the coramission indicated that �,f the devel�pe�s rri�hed approximately 100�', retail, tihey would hava to provide a traff3.c analysis, a�d if the analysis sho�red �ustification for the light at Summerfield and DurY►a�n Road, the signal would have to be inetalled at their expense. Cb2�9MISSION DTSCUSSION AND AGTION: After further discnBSiou,, ...�.�.�_ ......_._......__ .�.�., S�ith MOVED approval oi the tenant mix requested by the applicant: financi�l, 13yb; of1'ice, �496; retail, 63�; that in t.he event �ha appl3.ca.nt desired higher retail occupancy, he should a�a:Ln apply to the Planning Commission and sabmit an up•dated traffic impact study and bear the cost of any additional traffic signal.s indicated by the stndy. The raation Ras eeconded by I3onn and carried unanimously. 5•3 VARIANCE, V 6•80 (Dennis O�Neel) NPO �2 A requea� by Dennis 0'Neel for a 1ot s1,2e variance �.ocated bn ttae north side of Nor�h Dakota, 210� easii of 95th, 2,50� west of 92nd (�Iash. Co. max Map 1S1 35AC, �00). Howard read th� STAFF REPORT and 12ECOMMENDA'�IONS. The �PLIC�ANT,"8 PRESEFJTATION aras tnacle on behalf of t.he ownary Denn.is 0'Nee1, by Eugene Barfst� 1,8?4� Wood buck Ciz�ale, Lake Oscve�o� who had noth:Ln� to add to the staff presentation. PITBLIC TEST�,IMO_,�,NX �aae confined to a que�tion by a nei g�boring resid'ent, who questioned what was meant by a vari.ance. Howard responded by outlining the ordinance requiremonts for the gran�3n� of a var�.ance, and ht�w �his particular request meets thase requirements. COMM___,� ISS�ON DISCUSSIQN .AND ACTION: Speaker asked t.he reason for the 5 foot strip of land attached to the most south.ern of the iour lots involved, separating Lot 701 from the dedicated hal.f etreet. This rras what was left over from prev3.ous flag lot accesses tio these four lots before it was decided to make a city ,�treet which would �erve undeveloped property ta the nortt►. Bonn MOV�A approval of Variance V 6•80� based on staff flz�dinge and reEOmmendation. Helmer seconded the motion. SmSth raisad the c�ue�tion of what woulc� beaome of the five-foo� strip eas�C o� Lo� 701, expressing concozn that it would become a no�man�s-land. Mr. Harfst stated they would be glad to give the ?.and to the ormer of T,ot 701 In discussion the commissi�n, wh�.le 3.� did not �eel it proper to mandate �he daeding of the 5 foot etrip to the ad�oining 1ot, d1.d feel the problem should be resolved among the partieso The motion for approval thereupon paseed unanimously. >: MINUTES TTGAF2A pLANNIN(# COMMISSION Ju1y 8, 1980 PagQ 4 5•�+ vn��zi�xc�, v 7-sa (aruce ciarx) rrpo #3 A request by Bruce Clark for a �ear yard setback variance located at 13575 SW 115th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 3CD, Tax Lot 3Q0). �Io�rard read the S7.AFF REPpRT and RECOMMII�TDATION. Bruce C7.ark, osvner, made a brief APPLICANT�S PRESENTATION. Thero was no PUHLIC TES��MONY o�'fered. �� GOI�MISST01� DTSCUSSION 1,�ND C/�TION: Herron MOVED f'or approval ot Vari.ance V 7�80, based on sta�f fi.ndi.ngs and recomraendation. The motion was seconded by Bonn and carried unanimousl�r. T.he pres3.dent declared a fivre-minu�e rscess. i 5.5 ?ANE CHANQE PLANNED DEt/EIAPplF.,NT DISTBTCT, ,CPD 1•80 (Copper Creek� P�PO �6 '� A request by Tualatin Devolopmen�t Company for a Zone �iap Amend�dent fram WasYiingtan Gounty RS•�. to City of Tigarct R�SPD (S�:n�le F'amily R�sidantia]. Planned Developffient riistr3.ct'� with a (�eneral �lan Revie�r o�. Stage I and a Px�elim3.n�x^y and 4eneral Pl.an I�evS.er� fi�r Stage II loca�Ced aouth o�f Durham Road� east oi Serena W�y at Pici��s Landing � Subci�.v9.sion (Wash. Co. Tax Ma� 2S1 14B„ Tax Lat 1Q0). � Sta e I: Hoxard read ttie STAFF R_E,�,P�O� and R,��QA'�ME[[�D�TTOAS for the first stage of this dev�lo;pmsnt': Vlad Voyti�.la of Tualatin Development Company, Inc., made the A1'PLICANT'� PF2E�ENTATION. He expressed appre.ciabion�for the .help the planning staff.had given them in worki.ng out t.he several aoncerns exg�ressed by aommisaionQrs at tt�e previous hearing. He brief�.y indi� cated the ehaage the�y had made from the original layout of Stage I� and sfiatod it xae their intention the sensitive l�nds be maintained in a uatural sta�e. �Ir, Voytilla thea introduced Joe� tll�lsh of Waker Assoaiates� Inc., of Beaverton� the consul`�ing pl:ann�rs/engineera• for tha pro�ect. YYa7.sh illuatrated tbe redaction. of tk��, aize ot St�ge T by reason of realigxunerit of str.eets. Thexe was no PUBLIC TES,,,�TIMONX offered on Stage I. MINt1 TES TI(�ARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, 19$0 Page 5 CO2�4I�ISSI'�ON DISCII� SS�ON ANT1 ACM TIbN_: Funk questioned access �to Lots 1 • �. ylalsh explained access would t�e by a commonlyvowned 30a-foot private drive. Sm�.th ra�iaed the question of bulldi:ng standarde arith reapect to zero lot linee, setbacke, etc. l�ith the aid of wall-mounted renderings,"Wa1sh explained v►hat they proposed: si.ngle••famil.y attached �3.th zero lot 11ne, but no more than two units in one building;_�building up to lot line ad�oining open space, to afford view; m3nintum side yard of four feet� with no 2ess than eight fest betxeen buildings; min�..mum of i5 foot back yard setback where back yard� abut. Speaker raised the question at zero lot line where eaves, for instance, overhang a.d�oi.ning pxoperty. In discns�i.on o�' possible probloms from t.la�a arrangement, plaleh indicated thie has been don� elsewhere wi.thout problem�. He commer�ted .he felt many subdi�r�.sio�is have unusable s�.de yr�rds. Smi.th approved th� 2ogic appl3.ed to �mall lots. Funk questionQd t.he temporary acceea to Durham Road. How�rd asked for a plot p],an shor�ing side yard setbacks on each of ttce lots, ue sugge�tec� as Recammendation �.3, ��That a11 building plar,emen't shal�. be shown Yax� a13. lots �r�.or to the issuance of build3.ng pormits.N Walsh stated at this poia�t the developer is not in a positian �o sabmj.t th3,s informar tion, Sm3.�h OVED a�proval of ZCPD 1••80, Stage T, Cc�pper Creek, based on staff findings and reco�mendatiar�s, including Racommondation 13 ahove• The motion �eas B�cc�nded by FIelmer and uuan.imouely approved. ', i Sta�e TI: � fIoward read t.he S�AF'F REPpRT an.d 16 R�COMME�ID�ITIANS for Stage II. .....- In the p�ocess he clariPi,ed Recommendation 2 by adding f1fox any portion ot Lot 145"e corrected Recommendation 8 b� �chan�in� the word nperson�n to ��permi.seion; and a�ked �.'he ��cnnd recommendation numbered $ to be desigaated 8a. In the APPLICANT'S pRESLfiiTATION, Mr. Voyt311a askad that the requ�.rement for 25-foot rig'hlr-of••way dedication on Lot 145 be removed� bocause t.hey intend to develop this at some uncertaln future date. � They may havc� an alternative to this dediaation to pronide access � without entering Durhaat Road. With respect to tha bus ehelter required by Comdi�ion 7, he call.ed attention to the temporary nature of the entrance to the developmemt at t.his po3.nt, and Selt the matter mi�.ht better be worked out in connoction with Tri�Met�s mastex plan for this area. He referred to his previous atatement about �rork to be done in the drainageway••they wi�h to leave lt in its natural atata so far as possible. He indicated on a �ra7.1 map' of the development An 3ncrea�e atn dedication of open ,s�ac� along the Tualatin A3ver f�*om 1� to 4.3$ acres. To do thi.s, Lots 65 through 80, Which h�d been enlarged by i a portian of thiB are�z, wero rgduced to th� si.ze shovrn in t.t�e pritten � a � { i �z�umEs TIGARD �LANNTNG COMMISS�ON July $, 1980 � Page 6 i , prasenta�cion to the comm�seion. Th�.s reduced avera�e lot siz� fx�c�m I approx3,mately 6,150 squar.e feet t9 5800 square feet. He po�nted out the tr�o privat� drives which serve only 3 and 4 lots respectively; also the st�allest lots (�.,Z50 square feet) between the eas�Cern north- south street and the �teep drainageway. He st�ted the deneity bonus their proposal implies is about 9 per cent as compared with the maximum allawed under the ordinance of 20 per cent. There was no PUBLIC TESTIMONX. _..._.._...__ Th� president alarif3ed with sta�f that thie was both tY�� pre- l,iminary and general k�e�ring oa thia subdivision unless there were problems which it wns felt needed to be �torked out, in �rhich cAee this would be �he preliminary hearing. Smith clarif�.ed with Voytilla �ehat amendments to tb.s condit3.oz�r� prescribed they fe1� xere in order. This resulted in shortening Cond�.tion 2 w�.th respecti to �ot �.y.5 to ths first aentezsce only-�tt rev�.sian staff agreed to. �OY�AIISSTON llISCUaSZON APJD ACTTOPT: Speaker que�t3.oraed iche �ationale for t�e app�ent dupl�cation. in Gondition 5 of deed re�strictione i'or the Durh�m I�oad LID. Howard exp�.ained the t3.m3.ng, which mak,eg reference bat.h ta purchasers of lots and the developer necessary. He m1,ao discussed the rat�.onale for the bus sheltar and pro�ected greater u�e of mass transit in �he future. Discu�sion of operatipn of model houses resu7.ted �.n changing na model house„ to o�mode7. house�n� the uumber of �ah3:ch ie sub�ec�t to City Cauncil determina�fon. With respect to signs on the property. wording was chan�ed from �reviewedp to napproved.01 Howard d:Lscuesed the ciensity ra�her extensivel�. He called attention �o t.he absence of any amenit3.�s provided by tha developer; that the dedication offered Mas for pa�rk purpoaee to be maintai�ned by the city; and that b� increaging the ded3cation to �..38 acres, the lots 65 thx�ou�b. 80 w�re rgduced in e�ze to the original plan. Smith questioned �hether the cnntinuation of the bike� path from Pick�s Landi�ag to Cook Park could be msde through this devmla�ment. Ho�ard suggested th�t reight be �tdded aa a requirement on the developer. He pointed out the development xou�:d result in a substantial develapment charge for parks, and that tY�era xas substantial green area pithin the develop►nent, a].�hough maintained �y the r�sidents. Funk queetioned the area xithin the R-5 zone. goxard explained his calculatiion� of allo�rable deneity under tha �oning on admitte,dly d�.fficul� ta;�rain� �ie called at�ention to the diffqrence between his calcu],ation of density nn the whola p,ro�ect (�.�clud�n� Lot 1y.g) of. 13� units, versus the 1tFl�. aslsed for here plus an estima.ted 15 more units in the eventual development of Lot 145, or a project tqtal of z59• (xote; iy9 a�v�.aea �y Y32 � Z�o.45�.) • ,: i MINUfiES TIGARD PLANNIN(i COMMISSTON Ju1y 8, 1980 Page 7 Speaker questioneal aome provisioae in the Declarations of Condi- tl.dns and �2estriati.onss particuiar].y the provision for assessmente on the basie of the x�umber of occupaats. Voytilla responded these were oz�1y g�neral, �nd rmuld be rewritten by their attorney. Speaker que$tioned a� Nhat� point of developmen�t tl�e residente Rou1d have contFOl of the3.r civi.c aseociation, which is a matter that would be included in the by-laws o� the civic assa�iation� wt�ich are not novr e e erre to the control that �he dev�Io er af Pi.ek's av labZe H r f d ai. . F Landi.ng .has of �hat civic aesocirztion �xntil a very substantial portion of thQ development has been moved into. The president queationed whether the planning commission should gst in�to this k�.r�d of Zega]. dotail on a development, although recogniying the validity of the concern. .After some discussion among Smith, Tepedino and �Ioaard it �aas left that Speaker pould express hie coneavns i,n �his respect in wr3.tin� to the Planning staff and the Gf ty Council, since final appro�al (i,ncludi.ng the final. forra of Aeclaration of Condi.ti,ons and Restrictions) mus� be g3.ven by �he Council. I�elmer c�uestioaed the 20-foot satback from, �.1�� auz°b to the gara�e doQr, He ealled attention that this is not a de�relopment for senior citix�ns. Smith su�gested the gounger people no longer can af�orc� mul�ipl.e care, and cars are �etti.ng u 17�'ttle shorter. Sm3,th MO_�VEU. for approval at both greliminary and general plan re�ai.ew level of State ZT of ZCPA 1-80� Copper Creek, ba�ed on staff f3.ndings and xecommendations� r�3.th the following �mendments: �•+� To Conditian 2: delete all but first �entenee. { *+�* Condi�ion �'f$ to read: nA.pplicant shal]. apply �or permissian to aperate model houae� in co��unation xit.h thi.s deveXopment. A11 eign� within �this development shall be approved by the Planning Dep�x°�y ment prior ta installation.�� •** The second Condition numbered � renumbered 8a. ' *•� Add �17; That a bika path ehall be canstructed connecting Pi.ck�s Landitxg trlth Cook Park. ' �*� Add #18: That Lot� 65 �hrongh 80 be reduced to tiheir original size. � �+►� Add #19: That the dedi.c��ion oi open space to the Ci�ty be increased to approacimately 4.38 acree. *"'� Add �ZO: That �he developer ehall provide a narrative � detailing the typas o� �ituations where hie proposed building �taasdards (wh�.ch differ frpm standards in city ordinaaces) r�.11 be applied. �he motion xas seconded by Bonn and carri.ed unanimou,s].y. MI NUTES TIGARD PLANNIN(3 COMMISSION ,Tuly 8, 1g80 Page 8 5.6 7ANE CHANGE PLANNED DE'f/EIAPkIENT DSSTRICT, ZCPD 13•�80 and SII�iSITIV'E I,AND,� PER?tIT, M 3-80 (Kittlesan/Brown) IdPO #5 A request by Raymond J. Kittleson and Mi].ton 0, Brorm for a Zone Map Amendment aith a prel.iminary Revierr for a Planned Un3.t Development and a Sensitive Land� Permit in a Light Industrial Zones A) R-7 '�Single Fami.�.y Residen�tial�� to M-3PD ��Light Industrial Zone Planned Development District�� on t�as.h. Co. Tax Map 2Si. 1, T� Lot 1400; , B) M-3 nLig.ht Industrial �one�� to M�3PD ��Light Industrial Zone planned Devel,opment D3.strictn on Wash. Go, Tazc Map 251 12A, Tax Lot 700 and Tax Map 251 12B�., Tax Lot 100, on 26.57 acres located at 7Q15 SW Bon3ta Road. Howard expla3,ned that �.n view o� a negative staYf report preparad for the May 20 meeting oY t.he comm3.ssio�a, the appll.cant w3.thdrew at that time. After cons3dering staff�,e co�xcerns, thay �3.sh to proceed at this time �.th what i� referred to in their letter ot June 13 ae an ninformal concept reviQw�� to �et xhat they feel is neec�ed input from the commission. Hor►ard thereupon read the STAFF REI�CIR'� an@ RECOMM�DATIONS prepared for the May ?0 meetin�. He reviewed the appliaant�s Mr�.t�en preeentation in come de�ca�.l. The APPLICANT°S PRE5�ATTA'SION was made by Michael. Shepherd, r�altor, 15823 S4Y Canyon Road, Port],ando A� i.ntroduced Mr. L. R. Davi�, 7415 i SW Bonita, ��nd iK�. Robert Starkweat.h�r, ownere of. the property for � nearly 40 years; 83.11 McNlonagle� sngineer, long active in the area; and ' �s cc�ardinator of the �r�sentation, Eldon Edarards, eon�niti�g planner. ° Mr. Ed�►ards .stated they were unxill.ing to proGeed on May 20 in �he face of a.xi adverse staff repurt; t.hat by the time they had evaZua�Ced t.he abjections it �ras too late to submit z�ew material tn this meeting; but that thsy felt they needed consultat3.on ari.th the comm�.saion, hence the�.r appearance at this t3.me. He reviewed hietory of �he floodplain concerns in the county; the num�rous s�eps requ:tred by ' regulations to get a development such as this off the ground. He agreed the sansitive lands information is minimal, exp].aining that j becAUSe this property 3.s on the main stream 3.t tt3.11 be quite expeneive to provide the information on effecte of floodplain n�odification. He described the physical ].ayout s�f tk►e prapc�sed development �ri.th res�ect to neighboring residences, railro�d �rackage and the nearby industrial area. He stated their bae�,c intent is �o increase, rather than dia�iniah flood storage capacity. t�i.th respect to the roads� they Are silling to prov�.de publlc e�reets rather t.han pr�.vatie roadRay as originally planned. They �ratnt to pro�ide s�u6outs for connection to other streets, including a railroad creasing for which they feal a need for city ha1p. � '1 � } � MYNUT�S TIGARD PLANI�ZNG COMMIuSION July 8, 1980 Page g Edxrax°�e .hoped the cammis�aion wo�1d (1) approve the zone change wi.th an� c�nd�.t3.ons though� necessary, to be passad on to the City Council, where it would be held uz�til the �eaeral plan had been aacepted by the commi�sion; (2) to �ive them same kind of approval ot the�.r b�sic building laynut so �t.hey c�uTd proceed vrS.th the ex�ensive r�ork required �o meet the sensitive lands requirement; and (3) t� hold the sensitive lands issue in abeyance unti7. this r¢ork has been done and consider it at t:he time of the general plan reviea. He acknowledged the raa�nitude of t.he qork to be done, but hoped out of this maeting �a' get a preYiminary concept approval which would �ustify their prt�ceeding rvi.th the very expensive studies required to comply pi,th the xis.hes and concerns of the plannin� Department and Comm�.ssion. There r��zs no PUBLIC TESTIMONY. COMM�IS_SIAN DISC�, U�SSION AND ACTIOPT: Sp�aker inquired 1�ox t.hey propoaed �o modiYy the floodplain. In general, they would expect to ��ceavata the flloodplain and u�� the material ta put under the bu�ld3ngs. They rrould smooth qut the floodplain� �ncreasing t:he storage capacity� and would use the floodpla3n area only for parlcing, aa permitted by the ordinance, President Tep�dino inquired Nhat it was thay expected �t4 get from this ineeting� pointing out the commission can only act on ��e materi.al presentQd by an applicant. The raspnnse was �o �at a prelim�.nary approval of baBic concep� prior to undertaking tk�e admit— tedly oxpe�sive engineering studiee required to meot the reccrgni�ed conoerns of t.h� comtnissian v�ith respect to the floadplai.n. There followed a wlde-rang3.ng discussion af filoodplain and greenway considerations, the past h3�story of actions af �he commission on such matters� the cost of flood insuranc�, tb,e advisability of th� commission giv3.ng aven tentative appsoval to � coMOap�t, etc. t+lra Davis� intima�tely �amili.ar w�.th the property by reas�on of long residence on it, ata�ed he has �ot yet see�, an aecurate map of t.he ar�a, but that �he one used in this px�eaentat�on is the c1o�Aet to facte on the ground, He fe7,t the bu3.ldings as planned xere indeed abav� the �lood— plai.n, HoMax°d re�terated the Plann�:ng Department�m eoncern�, eepec3.a11y with respect to the ].ack oi �nformation xhic.h in effe�t �SUts the baraen of d+asignin� ths pro�ect on the Planxiiag Department. He enumera�ed the reaeons fgx his original negativiem in the ori�'tnal et�ff repor�. Speaker �tated �he ataff xecommendation stated hi� vieu of the appl,i,cation vex°y well� except �hat ther� $hould ve an adcllt�onal ' Conditian 6 a� followst �The pro6lem oT t.l�a a�:ght d3atance at the Banita intors�ctioz� si�ould be addressed.n Smith MOVE13 for �pproval of staff�e recowmenciatian P`or denia3 � with the addltiern o� No. 6 with respect to t:he 8on�ta i�ter�eC�ion. ! The mo�3;on t►as �ecor�ded by Speaker and carried un.animously. ; i � , ; i :l i �� _ -. . _ . _,: _.. MIIdUTE5 �`IGA�tD FLANNING COMMISSTON �uly $� i98o page io On be.half of �;he applicant, Mr. McMonagle inquired a'bou�t the passibility of a study.sess3on talt.h the commiss�,on. It was felt to be a po�sibi�.ity� a7.thougb Smit.h expr��;�ed the viep that �he Plann3.ng Diractor refl,ected �he vieWS of the con+mission, especia113* on f].vodpl,ain and greenaay concerns. It wae left tha� the applicant �►ou1.d work furt.her lvith �he Planning Director on t.�xe pro�ect. OLD BUS�S: Jos Van Lom of Yan �,om-Kraab�r�e,r Partner�hip, architects an d lanners e e , x r ssed hi.e concern b P r saoutt P he pract3ca13.ty of the A-�12, A-�0� A�40 ordinances (�OA 2••$0) recommendod by tl�e commission for approwal bg the City,Council at the ,7une 3 meet3.ng. He statied there aere 3y. prop�rty owners in'�.he are� invol.ved �ho �o no�t qualify wi.th 20�000 square feat; tour o�►n 20,OQ0 square fee� to one acre; and four owners have parcels oY one acre or more. �Ie telt the y.0•foot front �yard �setback waa a iaistake (alfi:hough i.t �ras insieted on by the NFO because of concern for privacy). Tie pointed out the difficuI,ti.es inheren�t in �he requirement for setbaei�s 'between bui�.dinge; avsn on one site, 3.11ustratGing it cv�.�h the problem af s�.ting gara�e�a, Yor i��stance. He �Serinted out that by 1�w 90 ,per cen� of landab7.e funds tnust go to buildexa o#' four or Fe�rer units, thue saverely restr�.ct�.ng �.he funding available to the small operator fo�° multiple honsin�. Ho particul,arly disliked the provision calZing �or d�velopmen�s or�].y on an acre or more. � Af��r can�id�rr�ble discussion, at Ii�wardos suggeation, Bonn N10V�3D r�cission of the actian of the commis�ion at the June 3 meeti.ng recommendireg approval of ZQA 2s80 ta the City Counci� for adop�3.one San3.th seconded the motion, xhiah passed un�ua.i.mouslyo i N�W BUS�S: �epedinn reiterated .his desire to etep down as presiclent of t�e conimi.ss3.un, feel3,ng that af�er �wo years the posit3on shou].d be passsd on to someonc� else. After svme d�scussion thie matter was deferred to the next meeting. Howard reported th�re Mould be anot.her meeting on the 4.I. Joe�s developmen;t at �he IISA offie� �r�.day at 1:00 o�a].ock. Howard ropoxted his inability aver th� last two week� �o �et in touch rrlth the nex appointee to the commi.ssinn. Wit�i respect to the fi�ling c�f vaaanciea on the commiasior�� Smith braught up the factor o� a�+a d�;stribut3.on, pointing aut he x�s �he youn�es�t me�ber on the com- m�.ssiCn, and .he is nearly �.0. Ho �telt some ��t�ntion shau�.d be gi,ven to �@tting representat�on of young people on the ca�misse�.on, The �reeid�nt declared t,he mest�.ng ac��ourned at 1.1.55• � 1 i 4 ►� . � _ ; PUBLIC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNING COMMI5SION ,� July 8, 1980 - '7:30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard 5. Public Hearings 5.1 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 9�80 (Durham Hall Business Center/Edens) NPO #6 A request for a Conditional Use in an. M-4 "Industrial Park Zone" for an auto repair facility located at 16285 SW 85th Avenue (Wash. Co. Ta� Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lot 1100) . 5.2 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 5-72 (Sumznerfield) NPO #6 A request by Raymond J. Bartel, AIA, Architect and Planner, for reappraisal of approved tenant mix for Summerfield Commercial Center located at Pacific Highway and Durham Road. 5.3 VARIANCE, V 6-80 (Dennis 0'Neel) NPO #2 A request by Dennis O'Neel for a lot size variance located on the north side of North Dakota, 210' west of 95th, 250' east of 92nd (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35AC, 700) . 5.4 VARIANCE, V 7-80 (Bruce Clark) NPO #3 A request by Biuce Clark for a rear yard setback variance located at 13575 Srr7 115th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 3CD, Tax Lot 300) . 5.5 ZONE CHANG� PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UISTRTCT, 2CPD 1-80 (Copper Creek) NPO #6 i A request by Tualatin DevelopmEnt Company for a Zone Map Amendment from ' Washington County RS-1 to City of Tigard R-5PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development District" with a General Plan Review of Stage I and a Prelimi.nary and General Plan 12eview for Stage 2I located south af Durham Road, east of Serena Way at Pick's Landing Subdivision (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14B� Tax Lot 100) . � 5.6 ZONE CHANGF PLANNED DEVEL'OPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 13-SO and SENSITIVE ', LANDS PERMIT, M 3-SO (Kittleson/Brown) NPO #5 � A request by Raymond J. Kittleson and Milton O. Brown for a Zone Map Amendment with a Preliminary Review for a Planned Unit Development and a Sensitive Lan,ds Permit in a Light Industrial Zone: i A) R-7 "Single Family Residential" to M-3PD 1°Light Industrial Zone Planned DPVelopment District" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2a1 l, Tax Lot 1400; B) M-3 "Light Industrial Zone" to M-3PD"'L'ight Industrial Zone Planned j Development District" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 700 and Tax Map 2S1 12BA, Tax Lot 100, �n 26057 acres located at 7415 SW Bonita � Road. � ;� For Tigard Times to publish June 25, 1980 an d July 2, 1980 ,j ;i ;,{ :� � 'i �a ,I )� � "PLANNING COMMYSSION SIGN—UP SHEET" �'.e, NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRTNG TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN Tf�IR NAME AND NQTE THEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET, �� ,,,�.--i /�/' g AGENDA ITEM: �6� / ACTION REFERENCE:��' �"� "`� C�v r� "�� I `. f__� NAME ADDRESS I . . I I AGENDA ITEM s � '�ACTION REFERENCE: ��i�C��/�''f� � "'i�✓ ' �� NAME ADDRESS �,A t �`—��`�L.. °L�lS �•�.. ��c� �1 ',�� {V�t(.�w. � � 'z *� . . , AGEIVDA ITEM:� ACTTON REFERENCE: �/��"L%CG-- �� NAMF ADDRESS ;'�_ � � "PLANNING COMMISSION SZGN-UP SHEET." �� NOTICE: ALL PERSONS nE�IRING TO 5PEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN Tf�Ik2 NAME ALVD NOTE THFIR ADDRESS ON TIiIS SFTEET. AGEt�TDA ITEM: _�)_• �� AG"TTON R�FERENCE: ��i6;%�''�- �/ ' / �L� � NAME ADDRESS 19GENDA ITEM: �F, S� ACTION REFEFtENGE: G i�- ��'C��---�G�� ' N � ADDRESS D� ,�C� � �G'�Gj LL.' L•°.LG✓�J L!/ . G�lJG� �it> G� � , � � . �. I � � , � � �` ��/�� e�7 �� d � � AGENDA ITEM; -� ' � ACTTON FtEFERENCE: `'L�!_��r�� ...- � NAME ADDRESS 1 ' -�.,, � t �} �• j � �-°a'��'1 rsS! '- i � 's � � . + i � � � � � ',, `, ��. � r: `t � � ; PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN MEETTNG LOCATION �. ��, ?, WILL MEET AT THE TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES BUl'LDING, BOARD ROOM. . . i 13137 SW Pacific Highway 7:30 p.m. � � � � � i� . ', � b STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.1 �� TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway - Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE� CU 9-80 (Durham Ha11 Business Center/Edens) APPLICANT: George E. Edens OWNER: Same 309 lOth Street Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 APPLICATION DATE: June 9, 1980 SITE LOCATION: 16285 SW 85th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lot 1100) NPO #6 REQUEST: For a Con ditional Use in an M-4 "Industr.ial Park Zone" for an auto repair facility. PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 8, 1979, City Council approved a Zone Change to M-4 (Reference � , ZC 24-78� Ordinance No. 78-85) . A Conditional U�e was granted for mini- storage warehousing in the M-4 Zone on November 21, 1978 by the Planning Commission (Reference CU 29-78) . The project received Site Design Approval or� April 13, 1979 (Reference SDR 18-79) . I. FINDIN�GS OF FACT: 1. The Code allows automobile service stations as a Conditional Use in a M-4 Zone (Refe�ence Sec�iori 18.52,020) . The Code further states in this Section . . . ."any other use held similar to the above uses, as approved by the Planning Commission". 2. Auto repair is similar to auto service. In •this case, only mechanical repairs shall be carried out, no gasoline sales, etc, shall be a part of this facility. All work sha11 be carried out within the building. No outside storage will be in evidence. II. CONCZUSIONARY FINDINGS: • l. The proposed use is compatible with the mini-storage warehouse use approved in this zone. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Conditional Use with the following conditions: � � .._ _ , . . � STAE'F REPORT AGENDA 5.1 �4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION `� July 8, 1980 CU 9-80 Page 2 1. A Sign Permit shall he applied for. 2. No outside storage of vehicles sliall be allowed at anytime. 3. Z+ennant; modifications of space sha11 be approved by the Building Inspector and the Fire Marshall prior to occupancy of this space. Fire Marshall concerns are: Change at Occupancy: Bring building to standards of Uniform Building Code as adopted by City bf Tigard, (i.e. Business "B-2" to "H-4" auto Repair) . ' � Bring electrical wiring to conform to NFPA #70 (Electrical Code as adopted by State of Or.egon) to meet stan dards for auto repair. Bring mechanical systems of building to meet standards of the Uniform Mechanical Code as adopted by City. Any flammable liquid systems, of pumps, piping, tanks, and other ' �` storage to meet the standards ior the National Pire Codes as adopted ;� by the Tualatin Fire District. � � 1 i ,,:� i i p 1 AZdie ;P�anning Director `I i .- ;>i �� l 3I' ';;� � � �� }:. �{ �,, ,��l�� ._..: .. . _ � : � :_ _ . �� $ � � o� : . 1�' . � �I �, . �' . � " .t�=� � - � : �y o � o• ot't _ �e�:�' -� ! ` � � . �` 3 R � � � M %U 4 �° � I� � �� y -�i � R; (,l s � C� h Q � ie � A ' O • •, � � � ' � w • , m � . z � ' n . ' y . � � �� M � y -� S u . N ' � � � . � . . . ' � . . .N . . . .. .. . . ill��.��, . � � ' ' � ' � . . -. � . i0q MO' 01" ON.f` . liif.94'L ' " �9 S� � �.. �3'.`� � � ' ...� ' � — . 51��... .� � � �— — �. .� .,. ° ' � `f,� e � � .� — .� a �I p . � . 1 t . + ' . ! � � = . N N • N ' �y� . � . 8� p Q O� . . ,�� I - . (. ' ' . ' � . . � . - � .. � . �. .. � . . `. .r �� .. . - � � � . � , , . . � : r W . . . �. .� • . " R ' . � � � �� r � �. . . . - � - � Q ..a� . � � .a 1�cy- . .c•ti�•.r zi aa/v�t8.�96��. b 1.:= ' -'!a. . s.' , . 1 Q N � � r� — � • b�. � . . . . � !� .�� . IM m .`O 0 N. . N " y�0 , �, O w 0 �" i . 2 0' �d + ° W � � ' a � • t � � ' ; . a .� �' . . . o i� � , p e � a ( • , i �"' ° � � � . w . �_ i � : � y . ? N ? . . . . . • � ,�. � . �` , • � �� . . . . _ . . � . �� • • � � . . � . . �. � ..� . a0 . - _ n � ' i" . • - �.. s str.� . , . . :: . , � . [AfT LIME fOlOM711 RICt AND�O .��! '*�+ , � T �O' >- ' " . � . ss�' � � '- - • �e�' . � • • . _ � �#*��* �) [ , „ - i��'' y= �` ; s�. . ..• . �r�f!iL I-�+1ik-.��:..ir,i.s;`' 7-� � , ..1 : ....._...�.._._, �____.. _.._, - . ,. . , ; .�._.....,.... �..�-�.r ,_ _ _ �+.. - !�a. ; , _,..._._ ._. _ � - - -- : _ _.. �_,._ .._�.__i...._....�.......�__..._....._.._._._._ ----- --- - - � , .z. c �.y- ��° .�- •_��,u,,,1,�u,h_ , � � � CITY OF TIGARI�, OREGON � OE2DINANCE NO. 7F-��j �;' AN ORDIN��NCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION B�C MR, GEORGE ED£NS � FOP, A21 A,"�.ENDi�IENT TO T:iE 1970 ZONZNG MAP OE' THE CITY OF TIGARD, CHANGIIVG THE ZONE �ISTRICT FOF A T�ACT OF LAND AT 16285 S.W. 85TH AND D�PICTED ON WASHINGTaN COUNTY TA;t h1�P 251 14A, T.�4X LOT 1100, FROM WASHINGTON COU�12'Y "RU-4" TO CITY OF TIGARD "i•1-4" INDUSTRIAL PARK ZaNE AND ADOPTING EX_TiIBITS "A", "A", & "C" GRANTING THE APPLICr1TION AND FIXING APd EFFECTIVE DATE, � . '1'HE CITY OF TIGARU ORDAI�15 AS FOLLOWS: S�CTION 1: Finding �hat the lands hereinat�er described have been heretofore and � are now classiFied as !nashington County "RU-4" and further findinqs that pursuant to prescribed procedures, the above-stated application for a zoning map amendment was heard in a public hearing held by the Tigard Pl.anning Commission dn November 21, 1978, and all interested persons were there and then afforded an oppor�unity to be heard, and thereafter the Planning Commission file� its report ancl recommen�ed approval with the City Itecorder, a copy therefore heretn attached and by reference made a part hereof, the Council adopts the following substantive findings. • 1. That the applicant is in conformance with the NPO �6 Plan desic�nation of institutional development. 2. That the propnsed zoning is compatible with the surrounding I�k. �� neighborhood. 3. Adequate water and sewerage facili.ti.es are available to serve the proposed development. SECTION 2: THEP,r,FORE, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 18.88 of Tigard Municipr-�1 C�da, the applicant's raque�� for an amendment of �he Tigard �oning Map of 1970 to zone those lands described in the attached Exhi.bit "A" for Industrial Park (h1-4) use is hereby approved subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.52 (Sndustrial Park Zones) of the Tigard Municipal Code as embadied in or _ exhibited by �he documents submitted and identified as follows: Exhibit "A": - Legal Description Exhibit "B"s - Staff Fteport � I Exhibit "C": - Site Plan And further subject to the following condi�ions; � 1. That ten feet of right-o�-way along S.W. 85th be dedicated to the . • City and a half street improvem�nt be provided along S.W, 85th to ' the City of Tigard standards before a building permit is issued. ' ' 2. That construction and drainage plans be submitted and approved by the City Engineer and Building Department prior to issuance of permits. � ORi7TNA�NCE N0. 78-�'f� ZC 24-78 ,_ .. _ _ _ _ _ . �, .. . ;' . - . � ..�.. � � I . . f I� 3. T!�:e public works agreement and band be submitted to thE Enqineer's ' , Department prior to issuance of permits. � mFi* P �SEC'TZ7N 3: This ordinance shall be effective on �nd after the 3lst day after a.�s F�, a , passage by the Council and approval of the rtayor. i� PASSED: By �y.,��o,,;�„ _ vate of all C:ouncil mem�ers present this �''�'" �` day of J�,c�• , , 197�, after being read two times by number ' �i and kitle only � ' �, . �' , � �, � h-.._—.,--_.�» �' Recorder - City of Tig�rd ` � / f t1 .�`PPROVED: By the Mayor thzs �� day of }��,,,� :, , 197�• � �, r i , � E • Mayor ° City of 7.igard s . 1 . j � i ; i 1 ; +': .�� ; , Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 78- ZC 24-78 . , .-•r�:+t, f� ' I . L _ _ _ _ ,. � .. ... ., ,.,, .,.., . . _ � _ _ . , , , � - c- c� �q-7�' . �' � � � ,;�� :`� . .. �,,, ... C1TY 4� `i'1C�ARL� R.o. �ox 23397 12420 S.W. Main Yigard, Oregon 9� , December l, 1978 Mr. George Ed�ns 309 s.w. io�n Lal�e Aswego, OR 97034 Re: CiJ 2�-78 Dear Mr. Edens: Please be advised that the Tigard P1.anning Commissior� at their regular meeti,ng of November 21, 1.978, approv�d your request for a conditional use pexmit to const�uct a mini storage at 16285 S.W. 85tho This a�proval is subject to �.he fallowing condition: 1. That the construc�ion and traffic circulation plans with landscaping be approved 3ay the site design planner and the Site Design Review !: � �X Board prior to the issuance of buildir�g permzts.�� y' � " ' The cnnditional use permi.t shall expire in one year from the date of �pproval, if the use has not bogun and continual progress towaxd its fu11 opexation is not an • evid�nce. � If we can be of an �t�ther assist�nce y n , p].ease do not hesitate to contact this affice at 639-4171. Sincerely, r�� Ken Selby Associate City Planner KS:db cc: Craig & Elean�r. Cowles Joi�n 0. Sachs Encla I _. _ _ __ . _ , , . . .. .� ��u.:�:.. _ _ _ .�.. f � . • ( � " t GEQRGE EDENS � 6 CU 29-7$ � December 1, 1978 - P.age 2 ��t� I: #� NOTE: 2'he following ackr,awledgment must be received by the City of Tig�.rd within £ourteen (14) days of your receipt of this Ietter. Failure to ��' rerurn thi� acicnowledgment may result in action by the City of Tigard. � I k�ereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning� r" Commission. Z have received and read this letter, and I agree to the deciSion �,i here clacumented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached. j! / �/„ �; � .tra�..�' --"/.,' "-C�.cC:"y�'� .��c..4.^.Y,�v�-,/" �;' � c�7�' �� - � ,ignature�f Date �; ';, ka ;� �. �:. {� ii !� �i� kj i; �; �+ �"z� P ��,�. ��: �, i� � . �,� �: � f�' i. I. � �; � C � ' �� I _ . _ . , � I ° � � . _.4��:��:��. � � . �� I g- � I �""° �:�3�:a � � I ..¢.W..'. ' � �lTl' O�' �"I�AF�� ,^ � � Q.o. aQx z�s� 12420 S.V1/. Main Tigard,Oreyan 97223 April 16,. 1979 � i George E. Edens � 309 lOth SCreet . ' Lak° OSW�oO� Oregon 97034 Res SDR 18-?9 Dear Mr. �,dens: Please be advised ttiat the Planning Director on April 13, 1979 approved your request for site plan and architectural review of a li�ht industrial business park. . This approv'al ia subject to the fallowing cor.di�ion,s: �� ls 1'hati all signage be approved by Site Desi.gn Review» 2. '£hat two adc�iti.ona]. landscape islands be added to Che north' and �t,, southwest corners of the par.king area as specified in the �taf� report. 3e l�o changes will be mac3e to approved plans or specifa.cations un2ess formal applieation is ma�e ta the appropriat� department and changes are approved by Cha� degartment. Appxication �or changes will be made in wxi.ting and shall include applicable drawings, engineeri,ng speciPications and otlzer details xequested by the department. No cons�ruction shall take place i.n these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this eondition will result i•n the immedzate nosting of a stop r.rork arder on the project or any partion af thz project. Tf we can lae 9f any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contaet this offiee at 639-4171. Sincerely, �� 4i � � Hilarq Mackenaie Plan�ing Assistant cc: John 0. Sachs, Architect � I?'M_/P.7 z 1 1 . . . �. . ` � � .� . � . � � t Y � George E. Edens •April 16, 1979 ' Page 2 .��e�. SDt� 1t3-79 `';�,, ' Note: The following acknowledg�►ent must be recei�ed by the City of Tigard . within fourteen (I4) days of your receip� of this let.ter. Failure ' to return this acknowledgment may result in action by the City af Tigard. • i hereby acknowledge this letter dacumenting the action of the Tigard Design P�eview Board. I have received and read tk►is letter, and I aoree to the decision here documented and to abide by any ter�s and/or condi,tions aCtached. . � ��C�-.�-��C..Y(�- ./? /�t�f N��%".'2,i �-"��"'/ �_��' w Si�natur�' Date , . �: �„�,; i , �� l_ � 18.52.020--18.52,040 (15) Tire retreading; (16) Restaurant, when related to the above uses only; 17 War�housin when related to the above uses onl • ( ) g, . � Y (18) Dwelling un.it for watchman and his family. (Ord. 74-46 §1, 1974 ; Ord. 70-32 §180-1, 1970) . . . 1$. 52 . 020 �Conditional Tn the M-4 zone the follow- ing e r aecessory uses a�e permitted as conditional uses when in accordance with C.hapters 1.8.72 and 18. 84: ( 1) Automobile service station; ( 21 Fruit packing and pracessing; ( 3) F`urniture manufacturing; ( 4) Heating equipment znanufacture; ( 5) Mac�iine shop, welding shop, contractor's office; ( 6) Paper product manu�act�ure, but not� including th� manufacture of paper itsel¢; � � ( 7) Railroad trackage and xelated fac�.li.ties; ( �) Public utility (such as �rater tower, substation etc. ) ; . ( 9) Toal and hardware manufacture; (10) Trail�r manufacture; (11) Warehousing and wh.c�l�sa1.� c�istributior; (12) Weaving of cotton, waoY, flax and other fib�ous mat�xi�Is; �t � (1.3) Any other use held si.mi.lar to the above uses , as �� approved by the planning cornmission; (14) Finy business , sexvice, processing, �torage or dis- glay essential or incidental �o any permitted use in the M-4 • zone and not conducted entirely with,in an encic�sed buil.ding; (IS) Building or structure in excess of two stories or t�aenty-five �eet in height whichever is less; i (16) Retail sales , when authorized by the pl.anning c�mmission, �upplemental to, in conjunction with, or part o£ any of. the �oreg�ing conditional uses; (1.7) Ga�den supply store when in conjunction with a landscape contractor's of�ice. (Ord. ?6-46 §4 (.part) , 1975; II Ord. 74-30 �1, 1974; Orcl. 70-32 �180-2� 1970) . I 18. 52.030 Lot requirements . In the M-4 zone thE lot II size shall be as follows: I (1) 3'he minimum lot area sha11 be forty thousand square ' feet: ' (2) The minim�am lot width shalt be one hundred feet. ' (Ord. 70-32 §180-�3, 1970) . 18 . 52.040 Setback requirements . Ex�ept as may other- , wise be provided in Section 18 .].2 .100, �he setbacks fnr non- resid�nti.al uses in the M-4 zone sha11 be as tollows : (1) The frant yard setback sha11 be forty feet, except ,� when across the street from a residential �one, a front yard � setback of fifty feet shal.l be required; 283 (Tigard 1/15/77) , AGENDA 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSTON ' , July 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. ' TIGAI2D SQi00L DISTRICT ADMTNISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard NO STAFF REPQRT FOR AGENDA 5.2 PLEASE SEE ENCLOSED ATTACHMENTS. ��':, I � ,I � , _, - . , � � � RAYMONn J BA�'TEL A1' �► o a4RCMITECTAND PLANNER 2515 S.E.Harrison �' MILWAUKIE,O'REGON 97222 � (503)659•3988 ��une �2, 1.�)�� .:��ts= o.� Ti:^:a-�°d . I J � �G�1-�0 i:�.j'l. lla�:1 i�V1�'@2t r.G. �o� ''�3�7 n,��1..,�.� Q� c�72�. I nrin ;�-,•n-r• t.� r; n '�c.r�.'�)_ I . :_....__i.�.!--..� . .n �.��.. _. . i. ?tf�: ;�v�-_..iei�'.T_lrc'�_CL �a,n::le��ci�:l Cen-l;�r �,%5—'J2. I D e Gs� �'1 d�_e : � l;e �•1�JLLC1 li?�e -t��is lette^ �or.�;<«...Y'cic�d to -rY�e Planni�lj Co?�ms_ssi on �lonu s>>i�,'n a co��y o�' t?:�e �rojeci, uite pl�n d_�l;z�ea�ti!�� t��af�i.c coLlnUs a�?d Lr��'1.0 C1.1?'�C"�=1.OP. I� 1S OLlz' i'�C�Ll2S� "trl�� 'ti"?.1S 15SU@ b2 ievie�YEC b�T the P1az�nin� Co�:ir7ission �t their July �, 1�80 r�eetin�. �s cli�cussed ir? oL�r l�t��ei, oi r��y l�, J_�30 vre �re requestin� tL1a� � ��,, the previoua occup��c� use �ix be r�versed or d.e1e�ed b�J the �l<�111i��;; Cor�n�.ss�.o_2 for ihis project. Cur. reasoils ior thi5 reques-t ai�e foLLZCled u�on tre fac-L- tna� �a discussion v��:s macle re��di_n� �� Gcces� to �9,�1, th� iz:lprovement o�f Durham Roa�. 2nd nodification of the si�;nal a�' :DL��:h2��1 ancl �)�`,�� Wrhen the Planiain� Co�r�issios�. ori�i?�.al1y r@V]_Pti1�C�. i,he proL ec�e ;�le ��eel �tilat tne cu.rrerit irlProvernents ne�a�e tne n�ed for ar�y �rescri�ecl te-r�ant rai�� outside of the uses allou;ed in a coru;�ercial zo�?e. �esi.des t'ze i��uc, �ypres�ed in ous prerious letter, we v�ould also �i'::e �o point ou:t �hP o�her f'ollowin� facts that �,�e �eel suppor�ed cur case iror� tl�e Traffic Im�act �lnalysis prepared 'oy CH2Tri hilJ_. �age 8 ��' the mr�ric I�e�ort unde�, C,2T�2.C1�J and T,EVel o?' Service Developr7ent states "Sinc� critical in�tersec�ion �!oV er.��s a:c�e i�ot s��n�fican�ly altered s or �kze V8S7_OL1S a.cces� plan.� , �11 �1_an.s a-re expec�t�ed. �o nave a v�l�icle count r�tio of .87 at LOS D. Tne calcul�tecl vehicle count ratie o� .�7 is on.l�T �1y�htl� 'niU'_�?er t'��w�� hc vehicle coun� l�a.tic o�' .��6 c�h-i.ch ��as calculatec� e��Lir�a�l;�d �or trie 1;�v0 a�.ditions ;..r��l�ni�; ;t�e ;j>>1T1::1�i''`�1.E�..Cl. �iQ121?7@:L'Clc1 Ce�ter, r��'?Cl. trith 710 �vc:�i S�T�� OZ' '�l°a•��'ic con.�trol �?1oCli£1.C�'��t_0T1S. �� There Fore , �ti!� -�I:�yo�.ct o�' added s�-L-e �en�r�.tect tr�.z�`ic f_ro�r �tGt�: ;�uT�mer- iielcl Co?:I:ae-rci�]_ Ce��ter is e?fec�tivel;;T o�z set b� tlze pz�oPo��cl roa.d tA��y �a.ticl tra�yic colltrol.. rr!ndi�'ic��ior�. � P r C. ^' -'- r ra c• , r (I a�e ) Tra�izc �:n�a�.c� in�1� �a..� 99G•� a.cce,�s. .�1.ceess �o g9�,j r�ducecl -rraf�'ic d_emal.zds on Du��h�,:1 1�- oad ar_ its in�er- aec��.o� t•�ith ��T. « . . � , C: . ; i :,� .�_ ^ r,� ,�._c, r.._ � �ar'_l ,�-� �-�-�� `�.;� �� __ t:L?[1P �a� �`��::� 1 � fl '''his volv�e reductios i� ��..r_�ticu.l�r_1J '�elnf�al ??z reducin� �; �tse no��e.��ial Proble� o�: �tr�=�'ic C�LlALl@S blockin� the �j 1�u.�L�.:a. ?ozd ei��t;��ance to ti�e >>ur,r:ler`'ield Comnerci�. Center, �y un�J_�� e e��r��ess�d co_ZCer��s o� 01�.Gm. r' ii �j �:�2 f'�@� �•.'1i".'ll L:-SES S;,JL�C�''1C �0131��.^� @a��i�G'SSE.'C�. 1.f1. �i2G lZ'c^iTI1.0 A.11c7.�.yS1S ''I .. ;��i,tiCl� �ZO�"!?; ��/i��rl ?JO�n�S jJ7'@V7_O11S1.�J' expressed 1:�3 OLlZ' J:�Tove�?��er 9 k� `t� �P,��@1:� L_22�� =Jt1T' p�111t 1.S L•72�� 21�_@31 Z'8.<<"'--,�i"'Cl.].?1�, �'_�e tena.�!� I'R].X ?'c`lt?O. �; ';1C' 2.�?�Y'�'C1�:�:G' �'nLi?' C(�f?S�_�.EI'c^.1.�_0';? O� i.C??S ;'`i�•�,�'tr;:L' c�..r'_�. lL �'_'?G?'@ 3.?.'C' I; -":l�- r''}, �•!- ,n±� c-- ' - . - - . •�.} - .�.r� . _ '1 i�l 'i 1 r 1 �� c. �' _. .._ Uitc.,_ �y�.�.��,,�.0i�a Or' --__i0I"_:i::.i.•1G[1 �_la'l. �}`p1�. ::i„GC_ 1)ZG-'c.,�E' Cj.O 71CJf"i i; he�i-La-te �o c�.11. �' io �� t��ul��, � � i � t f �a.�T_. ?�d_ J. ba�,zel � ,,-�„ :.,< �J--�:i1� � I;'; �� e�� .; , ° �%- ' �' • 1, .;- ' , �� . _ ..�,,,; . . . , , �� ' �►V6�SHN`dGTON C.(�UMY,CIREGOt�C`� May 2Z, I980 ' Mr. Ray�noond �7. Ha.rtel . • . 253.5 SE H��risaa� , Milr►raukie, O�egan 97222 . ' , . R�.._z'��CE`z SUyii`��'2�T�. CO.i`Ti�:4CT.�1T.. t�I'�'s ZC S-�7Z. • ' • Dear Sir: ' • � At the Plan*+�*+q Commission mpatinq las� ev�ni,ng, T discu.ss�d youx reqizest . . . with the Camzaissioxs. �ey have agre�d•to co�sider this u�a-��er in .Tu3.y. We will meet o�. Jurxe 3rd, b�tt �ar� unablP �o �eet the r,z�'!9� „��-.3,�e . ' sequ3.rea�nt� in yc�ur casp.: Zhe �ly meetin.q ua�,ll �ae held a� r o�+r].er Jun3,or . , .• . . Ha.gh School., Lecture r�om on Jul,y �0 198(1 a� 7:30 p.m. ,i�, Z'he P2ann,inq Commissior� asked that yau present a �srief rev�i.ew of the �aroject �v date, show a sit:e plan wit�h -traf�3c patter7is inc7,uding �he 99W 3.1�cj3.2S5� . - � egress point, and clearl� irtdicate wYsat t�af�ic changes yau fores�e, I ' suqges� you palish the txaffic s�udy and aacitac� O.D.OoT sa that you are � ' covered: i: Iit is not my int�ntion at this poi.nt. tcs draft a Staff Report. I cvill iaclude. . your le�ter to �,e and tZ�is response in tTz�ir packets. I suggest that.you " s�d me a �.etter deta�li.nqyoux plarzs, e�tc. so tha�k the Co�.issa.aners apil?. hav� a chaace to stud� you� proposal px3or to the �i.ly m�eting. T would exgea� - � t�he letter. ta be 3n my hattcls noi: later' thara�3uxxe l�,� 1980>' . � �' Your t ,�, . � . ' T� � . P inq D�rector . � AHv�c � . cca Tigaz@ P3.an��,i�c; Larn�i�s:ianer� . ♦�� 12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TiGARD, OREGON 97223 PH; 639�4171 � _ _ _ _ _ _ ,, � � � ( F�AYM�N[� J BARTEL A 1 A � ARCHITECT AND PLANNER 2515 S.E.Marriso.n ° � MILWAUKIE,OREGON�17222 (503)659-3988 �''��f l_�), 19c:0 City of T:�;;ard. P.C. 3o:c ?_.3�97 Ti.�;ard, G?? 9?227 ATT�:I�f�.'TG��;: A7_die uo��2rd r,.i,: �e�ues� 1 c�r i eaiop-rais�l o? �.p��rov�d_ ten.�nt riilti .i or_ ;�ui�ir�ier- ' �iel d Co�m��cial Cent�r. Septe�oer 5, 1��J� Plannin� Co?�=aiss�on � Reviey;. � _ �r� i � The e1,��_bit subr�zitted �o the Pl�s�nin� Cor;uiission lar ttze revie�•r of tile ;aunr��er_'ield Cor,�ne��c�_al Cenn�er inclzictecl a state�aent of , prob�}�1� use mixes equal to 40�� etail an.d. 60;v o:'fice. The desi�n oi the site p12�1 a��d structures as o?''i��,-in�l1� nroposed. and �.s ir�plementecl a11ot•��s a :f1.e_cib�e interr�i�in� oz o�`fiee an.d retail �aace. Tile ori�ina.l L�.se-�is� propos�.l approved by the r �`r Pl�:.�n;,�� C;o?��issior ��ras bas�d u��^�. Pi�rl•_et stud;j p?-�ojections. T.he ma?�?�et �_s noc•� bein� testecl. a� t'ne proj�ct is r_ea.r�_n� completi.o��. �1e fi.z�d that actL�al co��.c�iiio.r?s are clos� t� tn�; re�re�se of w?��t h�.d 'pee� �ri�ina�1J ai�p?`'O�CCl. ti�1it�� the de�and ror o?�'ice a�ad ��azl space ��ein� r_evez,sed, vre (hEar b�r) r��uest that t'_ne .�lanr_i�!� Conmiss-�on reve?�se �he r?ix ori;ir_a7.1y sho��n o .r, delete the reayu�_renlen� for a pr�scrib�d mix. ti�le feel tre use �?i:c can be r�odified or_ delet�d with no ne�ative ir.lpact to �the are� based upon the iollo�f�rin,-r�, fac�tors: l. i•iajor ;r�nsportation s-�reets bounclin{; th� pro- j ect a��e bein� improved. 2. 1�2 "traTsic i;�pact analysi.s" b�r CT-�2I�i-tIi1.1. pre- p�i ed dt�.�in; the d�s�gn reviec��r phase o�' the pro- ject re�lects similar trip aen�ra�Lion �e:r squar_� x oo�t For re�Lail space ancl �!ost allov�ab:l_e off ice uses. n}1S'Ol1�h �the �:L'OC2SS (�f ('].@��:(1 revie�•r, e:�tensive S�UCI.y G�Ic'lS �=i trpn •(;n f;l'tt? vnl. iam� o?' �tr.affic and auto circLtl��tion in �nd ?not��. the `.;�.��:;ti�- �i�1�. Center site. b'_].��-,''_�� ttil''TL o�zlf lanes for ��res-t bound tra�fic hGv� beFn add.ed. ozti �)u��ilam Ftoad �t the �roject bouY�.d,aries. �n e�-L:cy-ex�it n2s beEn actc;.e�. to tl�e �or�h bOL1i1C1. lar�e o� the Pacz:l:7.c � �1;�;l��:lay. A r�cles;�n o�' the �tr.a.�f ic si�na.l at Durham Road �nd P�r; �'�.c II_�.�ht°�a� is also a pa._c�l; oi' thE t_raf�'ic ir�provemen� �ro�ran�. _ _.. ._, _..::_ , „ _ , ' r , . ! , � � � .. � C i.�;;r o�: '1'i�;�i°d. � r z.�:e 2 ��a�� ]��, 19�0 w �: (; '.;e �ee]_ corru:?ercial oifice, r_Zedical/dental ai:�ice and savin�s and i lo��.n L�s�s c�u�i7_=y as o_Ffice use per the preUious Pla�.ning �;' Commissi�ns �c-l;ion. The "t.ra_fiic im�act an.alysis" esti.mates trip i; �eneratioiz per. sqt�are foot o� space as ax�pro�imately the same ior ? retail shons, medic,�=.1 /dei�tal o?fice an,d saviz��;s and loan. Cor�mercial 4% oz�'ice L?�e is tne or_'_y enc ��rhich is mU.ch loi��er. T�o restri.ctions � h�v� oeen pl.aced or� the dii�erer_t t�rpes of oi�ice tei�.an.ts a11o�>>ed. ' C The tra._��'ic study also st�tes "that a portion oi trips �enerated ;r b,y d�vel.c�nn�nts sim.i7.ar� to thz.s a?Ze comes di.reczl�r 1'z°om tr�.ffic ;`. �l �1 r,. -n � 1 �•rt;^ �l• ^ �' n O �-- , �c.�.�;�7__.v �,'.�C; �i1�.ic; 02? clC1.Jc,CE.'T:v 1"'OcJ.C�;:�l� .t c.�1C�� L�'?C,'1E,'.i.0?_'c � C1.02�.� 210t, r co:��;ri�u�e to i.nc;.r.e�Jed �r.zi�'s.c f'los�; on those f�ci.lites." � ; ; I�� conclusio?�, t•�e fee]_ �.el�ti.n.�; tile use—mix requiremen� ��olzld ,'; h2ve 1i�:�1e int��ac�c. T�iodiffir?� it �0 55;� retail �n.d �5� ofiice �. ti•�oulcl ��.�ve no iir.pa�t. � You�^s �ru7 J, ti �� . ��,�awy; � .y� 17 Pa.y� . J. Bartel � RJ��kle �' 1� tk , �� f . �' 1.!'. •� i' i �:a . �:; i ; ; �I f. `''I . `�� i r� i �., _ _ . _ , ,. _,, . .., . . v..,.-, .. :..._. �I i i r . � STAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5.3 � r�'�' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, ]_980 ; TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMTNISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD RO01`d � 13137 SW Paci.fic Aighway, Tigard � DOCKET: VARIANCE, V 6-80 (Dennis R. O'Neel NPO #2 N � APPLICANT: Dennis R. O'Neel OWNER: Harold and Patsy Lane 10175 SW Barbur Blvd. #211B P O Box 801 Portland, Oregon 97219 Antioch, California 94509 R3�QUEST: For a variance in minimum lot area requirement. LOCATION: On the north side of North �Jakota, 210' west of 95th, 250' east of 92nd (GVash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35AC, 700) . PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission approved Zone Change, ZC 5-80, April 15, 1980. Ordinance 80-42 approved by the Tigard City Council May 19, 1980, T. FINDINGS: Chapter 18.76.Q20 .Granting--Conditions of the Tigard Municipal Code allows . a vari.ance if the following condition.s are met: i �' 1. Exceptional or extraordinary conditions applying to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, :� which conditions are a result of lot size or shape, topography, or other 4; circums�tdnces over which the applicant has no control; ,i 2. The variance is necessary fo.r the preservation of a property right of the a�plicant substantially the same as is possessed by owners of other .� property in the same zone or vicinity; °.I 3. The authorization of the variance sha11 not be materially detrimental to the purp,oses of this Title, be injurious to property in the z'one or ,1,i vicinity in which the property is located, or be otherwise detrimental to the ' objectives of any City develppment plan ar policy; �I 4. The variance requested is the minimum variance t'rom the provisions '' and standards of this Title which will alleviate the hardship. � II. CONCI�USTONARY FINDINGS: 1. In this instance, the conditions placed upon this development created the hardship - i.e. a fully dedicated, fully developed right-of-way for public use. �' III; STAFF RECOMMENDATION �;I i1' Staff recommends approval of this Variance. ,'', i �"I r;I 4.I , Planning Director I�� _ �:�� S'3: . _ _ 'i _ _ , , _ .` " ` I . . � � � C '! . , � (��_�;. STAFF REPORT � � ` '� t�.GENDA S.7 �'` ''�IGARI� PLANNING COMP2ISSION 1 ,�pr=]. ?5, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Ju.�ior High m LecturE Room lObo� SW Wa2nut, Tigard fi � - DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 5-80, Uennis O'Neel APPLxCANT: DENNZS R. 0'NEEL nWNER: Harold & Patsy Lane 10175 SW Barbur Blvd. , Suite 211-B P O Hox SO1 Portland� Or�gan 97219 Aatioch, California 94509 �p�LZCarzorr DATE; Maxch 20, 1980 SITE LOCATION: Adjacent to north sidP ot SW North Dakota, 210' wast of SW 95�.h Avenue and 250' east of SW 92nd Avenue (Wash. Ga. Tax Map 1S1 35AC, Tax Lot 700) NPO #2 REQUEST: For a Zone Char�ge from TnYashington County RU-4 to City af Tigard R-7 "Single Fami.ly Residential" Zone. PREVIOUS ACTION: '� �f„ , Property was annexed to the City of Tigard by Boundary Commission E��al Action Number 1557, and ktesolution Number 80-2 passed by Tigard City Council 1/14/80. I. FINDINGS pF F�1,CT: ' 1. Neighborhood Planning Organization #2 Plan adopted by the Council 2/24/75 designates this parcel as R-7 "Single Fainily Residential". 2. Development on Lots 501, 502, 5Q0, adjacent �a the east by Bi�l Godwa.n (reference MLP 3-80� will include a half street improvement to local street standards to the approval of the Public Works Director. 3. Gravity sewer service to this area may be cli fficult due to the slope away fxom the main line in SW Nozth Dakota. 4. Actual plans for development have not been submitted to staff for revie:r. Applicant indicates that 4 single family homes coul.d be built on this si,te if a variance for area standards was approved by the Planninq Coaanission. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. This request is in campliance with the Comprehensive Plan. �� . . �. ,. ,,,.. ._._. �._.... . , .. _,_—.�.�--,.-_ , . . _ , , ., �~ � � _ � n STAFF REPORT r AGENDA 5 .7 �� TIGARD PLANNTNG CONIb?ISSI�N �`" April 15, 1980 ZC 5-80, Dennis O'Ivee�. P�g� 2 �II. STAFF Rc�Cua�1MEN7�AfiION;; r ' 5ta�f recommeads aP�ro•val subject to �the following conditions: l. Half s�seet improvements to be made to ST�v No.rth Dakota across �� full 130 foot to connec.t wa.t,'� im raved stxeet to the west.. fronta e o� lots 701 ancl 7dD p � Applicant to constx�uct� hzlf stree� impzovemAnts fram SW North. Dakota, north approximately 350 feet to northern property line tQ local street standasds. This street to be constructed, if possible, in conjunction with the development im�ecliatel� to the east, fBill, Godwin, GHT, Znc.) All construct:ion �lans to be approved by the Fublic Works Director prior to the issuance of Buildi.ng Perm3.ts. Necessary right-of-way to be dedicated in conjunction.with dedication by prop�rty owner to the east ta a1�.ow �ar construc�ion of 7.oca1 street. 2. Zone change to be conditional upon Counci:l's passage of annexation ordin�ce fdllowing receipt of final order from Boundary Commission. � T� `: � ��,' 3. All utilities to be placed underground when development takes pl.aae. 4. Property owner to fil� subdivision application for this property in the futuxe. 5. Grading plans and construction plans on aIl public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to cananencement of work. 6. No cha.�y s wijZ be as��..^_ ta ��pr�� glans vr specificati.o�as unless forznal application is made to the appropria�.� City department azid charrges axe approved by that department. Applicatian for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. � � 7. No Building Ferma.t snall be issue8 until the expiration of the twenty (2q) da�r app�ai p�ria� From tne date of. approval.. � 8. Improvements to be bonded prior to issuance o£. Huilding Pezmi.�s. . 9. A public gravity sewer be cons�k.ructed on the nozth/south st�eet stub to be auiLa�c��.� Lv :1::::: ;��:��::�. Aven�e. sewex Tine via. an easement. T'his �a y CGiiS Liii�:4cu ii y'vS5 ~- � se�2�- .�.a,r�� .� � i.�� n cvri-uri�tivn with the develop_ ment im�diately to the east. . t� ' C ^.1 � . y` ' /` . . . . o.1 � Y ..] y . l . , � . \ ` STF+FE REPORT ' AGENDA S.7 TIGAP.D PLANNING �OMMISSION Apsil I5, 1980 ZC 5-80,, DPnnis n'Neel Page 3 � � � � 10_ A variance to R-7 lot size �tandards b� abtained �o Crea�te fo•� (4� 1.ots on this sitE at the .tiine of application €ar a SubdiVision �xeli�nir�axy� plat. ' � Prepare:d b d lanning Di�ec�kor . AHvmc t �, � � . . � � . �` . _ , • ,w.. �. � �u.,,.,. _ ._. .�, �..,<.,: , . �.� ._.,..,:; � � , �.—� �� , �- V w �� r . Q'(�T � � .1� t9Df9 �" � � � L� o oai (,: . I , ,� . . K -. � . . , � � �� . �s - � t � � ; � L� .g � .... �..o�_ � - �. ; _ _ i� o sCt�13At1 . ` �`p�s� 7 �im �, � ; - Puc'.5 MS . � �a a� N ~ M� � v � I �M i � � � � . . ! � � � � . . � - � I � J 92'r£4 l �• h -+ ' . IE�bC M,Ot o� 6 55::.2 • ", .� S 6CZ _ Gl Gl 1�'SZ�T 1 � . s � . . ; ^ , '. ' n � 4 ..�.a ` � � ► � . � ", �R � � .Ea�r� *`. - I . . - r= �' ' �'�Q � 0�1 ',� - �•:4�iir �� I � 0�� t�N L � 6£'t02 = � � 1 • �N __` IS912 _ � ._ ` - � r - �� ' ��Q� ;, ! � � �� J � i Z'1f o . a v (� �,.: ' 4 ;� �� ` � � �;� o � .E o Q �� ` 3fiN3A�t a � h C� CS �� •�,��;'�' ''�" �i�'�J� ��S ..�� ,o.�l:�.. , 7'K� � ;;, i 6'L.,'' 'u,�. i7B " t ti:5 ` .:•� � ,dapt � a. M,^..�.kLr�_ � :� • N �( {q � , yt V J ' C+ �' `�1'�1 ° �1 'n n _,., �'="°,s°'°r �:O N 2 �� ' �i O �� N • l W � i � �� -�•, 8 �v�rs J.. � �� a l T ;I ; z �� rJ Q e �! ( �tSK � " N 1 M UI i,p N 2 :8 f F i �i; I r'" 'Q L�tT �� d • . . N �,O �. �� '�r �, a 6�//� Iwe - ' l, ' ��- v p� � �. 2: `l � ' l) Q Q � u < <J ;�O \6f1 � �' �• /, � V � � �' ��! � �'�b'.Z9 I''''�.�-�+3E �� . • 6G2 OC ✓C •........�...........a.. �� / SIO! 'oA t 7 1 ' : '• c::2 e ./� . . ��A`' � , . yI.•�/6 al�i ��,NH,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;�.fY':�„N,,,`,,,,,,N, � ! �M ��1 . . . . f%/%r%/.(%//.:'::%/.'/.%%/.%Y/./.:%/:ii%/.%JG'�1.�."iiiil,�i%ii��;;,l;.�tc�(„��i i�/j.iv/.Ui�,avi��r:'."�i'."i�i/i�i,r�..... .:�'YiliiY�ii%//�%l/,•.1G`/r'/.' r---'------• �:i.fl��+1r...s,.�+fi�lfiir..SUcr.YI'i',c"+'*!Z"��. +�' : ♦ ♦ • R $ , ��•^fD .•'�+ •{f'li . •• .�' . .r.i.,..1 Ct i z?.'"f'. .1�"�'.`-.?5`v _. .--•. � � , � d � , % ' r� � .� • I 1 .1 �. i _ _ � . . .4 .� � �/�� /�� . , . . l ' � � ,��"� � � P 2e+� � �;M1 CITY OF TIGARD� OREGON ORDINANCE NO. SO- �Z� • '' � � AtJ QR.DINANC� [�uGPTTNG F223DINGS WZTFi RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENAMENT' j TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF Z'f� CITY OF TTGARD AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i ; � � i � . � PLANNI�IG DEPARTNIENT REFERENG� INE'ORMATION: � 'Z'ax M..ap 1.51 35AC�, Tax Lot 700, Praject Address adjacent to north side o£ SW � � � NorLh Dakqta, 210' west o� .SW 95th Avenue and 250' e�st of St°a 92nd A��nu.�. ; , File I�umber ZC 5-80, Present Zoning Designation Washington C�unty RU-4, Zone �! � ch�ngec3 to City of Tigard R-7 "Singl.e E'amily Residential", Applicant I)ennis ` i; ; R. O`Neel. ' ' ?' �, i; � - -- (, �, #;� :?�'••� 'rfiE CITX OF TTGAP.D Ok2DAINS AS FOLLOWS: � SECTION ls Findinc� that the lands hereinafter described axe now classified as Washi.ngtan County RU-4, and further findings tha� pursuant to procedures, the abovestated applacatian fnr a zoning map amendment �aas present�d � at a �tabl.ic hearing held by the Tigard Planning Commission on April 15, 1980. ,°i A�.l interested persons were affnrded an opportunity to be heard at this pubZie . ;j hearing and thereafter the Planrning Commission filed its report with the C.it� `` Recorder, a copy hereto attached and by reference made a part of_ The Cauneil �' �. adopts the fol.lowing substantive findings: i',� �± A. That this application is in conformance with the R-'7 "Single k'ami.Zy ',�� P.esidential" Designation on the NPO #2 Pl.an which i,s a portian of the . '" adopted Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and �`' 4:� • ty B_ That the p�oposed zoning i� compatible with the svxraunda.ng nei:g�.=..^erne�� ; as determi.ned by th� Tigarc� Planning Commission. {': � SEC�ION 2: Therefore, pursuant ta the requirements of Chapter 18.8a of the � �� - Tigard Municipal Code, this request for an amendment ta the Zane �! Ma.p of the City of Ti.gard is hereby approved subject to provisi�ns of Chap�er �' 1.8.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code as embodied in adopted Exhibifis "A'°,- "R". �; �. and "C" attached and nade a par� o� this Ordinance. � � t � . `' ��' l', OF2DINA.t�10E NO. 80-� � �' ZC 5-$0 . �i � . . � , �. � • , .+. Exhibit ��A��: - L,egal Description, E.xhibit ��B��: - Tax Map, Exhibit '�C�•: - Staff R�gort `�,��,� And fuzther subject ta the �ollo;�ng condi,tions: 1. Ha1f stzeet improvements to be mac3e to SW PTorth Uakota across the full 130 foot frontage nf lots 701 and 700 to conxiect with improved street to the west. Applicant to canstruct halr street improvements from SW N:orth Dakota, north apt?roximately 350 feet to northern property line 'to local street standa.rds. This street to be construct�d, if possible, in canjunction with the development i�cliately to the east. (Hill Godwin, GBI, Inc.1 A11 construction plans to be approved by the Public Works Director prior tn the issuance of Buzlding Perr,�its. � Necess�ry right�of-way to be dedic3ted in conjunction with dedication by property, owner '�o the east to a],low for construction ot loaal. street_ 2. Zone Change to be conditional upon Council's passage of an:naxation oxcIinance following receipt of final order from Boundary Commi.ssian. 3. ,�..11 uti7.i.ties tn be placed ur�.dergn.ound wkien development takes plaae. 4p Property owner to file subdivision appl.i.cation for �ch�.s prape:rty in the fu�ure. . I�„, ,,. '4� � 5. �rading plans and canstxuction plans on a11 public right--o£-ways shall be sub�.fi.ted �.nd approved by �he Public GITlJP�{S Di.rector priox to commencement • of worke . i6. Na cnanges will be made to app roved plans �z specifications unless forma3. applicat�ion is made to tlze apprapriate Ci.ty riepartment and changes ar� apprn-�re.d by that department. Application for changes will be made in � wxiting.and sha:Ll include. applicable drawings. . ' 7. No Building Permit �hall be issued ur�t:tl the expisation of the twenty (20) day appeal period from tl�;;� da�e of appmval. 8. Improvements to be bonded prior ta issuance of Buildang Permits. 9. A �t��1�� ;ravi�;� sevr�:: b� consti�::�=Q� c:; th� north/south street stub ��.a . . be canrxected to the SW 95th Avenue sewer line vi.a an easement. Z'his sewex line to be constructad if possible in conjun.ction with the development immediatel� to the east. • 10. A qa.rj.ar��c� �n R--7 1ot sa.�c 5t'c4S1dZ?"C3.S be obtaixied to create four (4} lots on th5.s Sl'tP at� tr� t��•ro ��'°�phl�.ca�ion fo� a Subdivision Prelizai.nary Plat, ' ORt�IN.�N� 80-�.,� . C� �' ZC 5-80 "''� Page 2 � -...: _ � � _. .. . , -._�.__.�.�.. w � ` � � � �. � SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective immediately after its passage b� , ` the Council �.nd approval af the Mayor. . PASSED: By �`JQi�,rno�r5 vote Qf all Council mem}�ers present this ` • /9��`" day af ��0.�� . , 1980, after b�ing� �, read two times by number anFi title only. I � ' / .J llir • .Recor�er - City o Tiq �� APPRQ�D: By the flayor this 1 g ' day os l'�(� ,�, , 1980. ---�-_-_� ' y or - of Tig t, f �' ' � ORDIN�INC� 80- �{�.,� . ZC S-sO � _ . Page 3 �� _ _ _ i Denn�s R. 0�N ' M, � 10175 S. W. B�,.uur Blvd. , Suite 2I1-B Portland, Oregon �7219 �^.� May 20, Z9$0 �:.., T.igard Planning Commi.ssion 12420 S. W. Main Tigarcl, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: ' I am requesting a varianc�e for lot area on the property legally described on the attachment "A" aad as s�own on the enclosed dra:wings. The total area of �he praperty is 3b,n76 square feet which would be satisfactory for 4 s�.ngle family lots in this zone of R-7. � However, due to the requirements of the Planning Commission (Ref. ZC-5-80) in tY►e letter da�ed April 22, 1980, half stree� improvements have to be macle which reduce the square footage to 27,299 sqe.x�re feet. Theregore, in accordance with chapter 18.76 �a�iances of th� Tigard Zcaning CAde, this request £or a variance is made in t�.att =�� 1. ) The reduction �.n �quare �ontag� is as a result of the Planning Cocmnission action aver wha.ch applicant has no cont=e�l. 2. ) Applicants ri.ght to full economic benefits of tl�is property will be dea�ied if this variance is refused. �. . 3.) This variance �aill not be injurious to any adjacent property or detrimental �:o the objectives of any , .. . ,. , �� City cievelopment plan or policy. 4.) This is the miniffium variance from the pr4visions and standards of the zoni.ng co.de wh3.ch wi11 alleviate the economic hardship. Thank you for your consider�tion. Yours tru�.y, , ' i �/ �+ ( .G"" .:��''„�°�C.�,,�,�,C'�.r'' '� ._ � � � Der��.s R. 0 Neel I � DRO:kms �,�. _ : _ � _ . . . . . , :J k � � ✓ � 1� �ttachment ��A�� 4 Descriptior� of a portion of Lot 23, "Ashbrook Farm�, a duly recorded p�.at in the Northeast � of Section 35, Twp. 1S.., Itng. 1W. , B�J.M. , Washington �aunty, Oregon, beix�g more p�rtic� ularly described as tollowss Com�nencing at th� Southwest Corner of said lat 23, said� point ' being on th� centerline of S. W. North Dakota Street; thence ' N. 0° 13° W. , along �he West line of said Lot 23, 131. 2� to the po3.nt o�•f beginning; thence contiriuing along said west lzne, lel. 0°13� W. , 245�74' ; thence iv. 89° 32� E. � �34. 28� ; thence S. 0° 1�� F., 351.08 to a point on the North �ight of way line of S. FT. North Da.kata S1t. ; then.ce S. 89° lOt W. , alang said tvorth lsne, 30.0� ; th�nce tv. 0° 12� W. , I.06.2� ; thence S. 89° 10� W., 104.21� to the point of beginning. i� , i �' , . STAFF 12EPORT AGENDA 5.4 1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, 1980 - 7: 30 p.m. TIGARD'SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard bOCKET; VARIANCE, V 7-80 (Bruce Clark) AFPLICANT: Mr. Bruce W. Clark OWNER: SAME 135 75 SW 115 tti Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: For a side yard setback variance to allow remodeling of existing home. � ; LOCATION: 13575 SW 115th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 3CD, Tax I.ot 300) PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE i I. FINDINGS: Chapter 18.76.020 Granting--Conditions of the Tigard Mwzicipal Code allows a variance if the foll�wing conditions are met: � 1. Exceptional or ex�raordina.ry conditions applying to the property f: that do not apply generally to o�her properties in the same zone or vicinity, Gi which conditions are a result of lot size or shape, topography, or other � circumstances over wYiich the applicant has no control; ` r � 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation of a property right �� of the applicant substantially the same as is possessed by own�rs of other property in the same zone nr vicinity; 3. The authorization of the variance sha11 not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Title, be injurious to property in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, or be otherwise detrimental to the objectives of any City development plan or policy; 4. The variance rEquested is the minimum variance from the provisions '� and standards of this Title which will alleviate the h.ardship. � `� TT.. CONCT,USIONARY FSNDINGS; � r�i ,I l. The neighbordc�es nat object, (See attached letter} l,) � 2. No material damage is done. :'j TII.: STAFF•RECOMMENDI�TIONr :''� Staff reGOmmends approval of this variance. ;� :� � '1 , Pl,anning Director i�:� �;.A � . . . .. . . .� � � :: . _ _ _ _ � � � I , June 11, 19�0 � ' Tu The Tigard Pl�nning Conani5sfon: We wish to add four feet on the south end of onr home. This will enlarge II two bedrooms. These twro bedrooms are sa small, there is only room for one person to walk beCween the bed and dresser. In wal�Cing into the rooms, we often run into the 4 end. af the bed and in master bedroom, the bed is so close that when d�essing and' • undress3ng (unless you are careful) you wiil hit the chest of drawers. Because � `II of the smallness o£ the roou�s it fs impossible to arrange the furniture any other way. ! We have put up wi.th this conditioa for years snd feel we no longer can tolerat� it. We have thou�ht of moving and found that we could not move out of the home I we have en'o ed so much, � y We are askinE for you to �pprove a variance of only one fo4t. We have a letter � from the aext door neighbor stating that �hay feel eztending the house foe�r feet f' would in no way hinder the appearance of their property or the neighborhood. � If ou could ac� u on this request as soon as possible it would be greatly Y P I appreciated. i �� s Sincerely, �ruce and Betty Clark 13575 S.T�. 115t1n Tiga�d� Ore�on 97223 `Telephons: i39-0762 ! V � � �......w... „� �. -,. m -,-_ . , ��, �. - ��.�,��...�.:,.�,�:,��,��,�,<,.�;�,�.w ,��,�,,�u�. ;�_� _. �� ., �;t� �, U . � ' � , . . � _ ' �_. ... .. . __»_ . M1 � � , -�--y-----• �/ fy7 j ..,.... , � � � ' � i � 1� •,� j � • � y t �� ,� � ; �,� :; u .,� \. �' . i �``r � wJ� f`� t •`� � , �1 � �-� � '�� -- � j � � { � � � � � �j ;o V�_�K-_.(-�'�' � . - , , � � ` � j_ . , , � i , s � . � . 4 �,. ,. + I . . . . �� + !� . . � .. . .. � 1 � 1� � � . .. v ' � �� i�. , , ..�.,.. _,�___�._...:_�r.�.._.�......__ __._.. , , ��y� , � " . � ra , , � , , i . :� � � I � , � � �� ` a � • ..._.�.-- - ......---_... _ ...._._ ._y ..--- . . . ..... . .... ..- - _._._ .... _ ... . � � . . ' � y � . . � . . . �' � . .4.��. .. � .. � . . . . ' . . . � . . . �� t . . .. .. . . r,, . � ,.� • � ;�: i ' t ; . �,r�,,l J. ` � � �6 � �� , ,� � � � � � � . �, t �,° � ! . �� . . . . . . � . �� . ... �� . . . . . . .. � . � 4;" �; � 4' (' �` . t i j-.. �1 i`�. �•I G' I I� � � € April 19, 1980 �` �< ,, �: }! �:' ii;� i; -We, Mr. & Mrs. Gerald L. Daniels of 13S1S S.W. 115th, �3 �' 'hav� no objection o� you, �ir. & 3�Irs. Brur.e Gl�:k of �' � 13575 S.W. 115th� cor�structing aa addition within k ft. oF }'' r. r: �, our north property line. ! E� � 4! n �C:� . �:' ,�j�.�,�?� � �. ��.�...� � Gerald L. Daniels '� ! ! �.�� t/�r?,'� Y� ^----• (..�Y'1_-c,�.'G�> � Glaghre S. Daniels � � '�•. _':'i � :'Q-,�.� , . . .. . . . ._ ... . . � . . . _ . - �„z-�v�1 ��'�23.� _ yi.= �`��"��..7�W=� �,��a_ �..�� f!�-p�-•'r -�:%Gr o+w►�a.ac'��`-�*rr'!�+*'X''Tl°!6C".S�°�.�++,..taN.�� v::�; "'. � -.�:-;,� `•ry�'�� + � � 1�� ~� 20T.90 - . .. ,. -..�.. � •�P� --' — — p�---- — ' 127.90 ' UO ' , 162 . � 1r.M 1 �� N ^7CM L E � �7� '�' p ^a N 89°27 W �' �25 ��t5 0 N / � m � � �. y . .�L e i�'n , � ry. s9o�b , 6300 6�00 �,� 200 � �cJ I � ~ �2i� .� REMAINCER �� O�� ,•'� py.,�m .34Ac. , � 5500 w °a OF TAX �..pT n,P � p.a: 23 � Z � 'm 2 � 12 ti� SMOK�v on� 6200 `'� �?°',�ti 24 � � �� 9 � Mar as i aca h',, � g " ;,'� ^ 'o ' ° sz y •v+� . , Rr``�� ' �oa's� m�� ' 22 6�°3�Z z�E s a ' r4 � � 54Q0 aF 5700 0°, ^ y�, � 5 g'Ss�2$� 165 7. '�" � P' � v zo �,� soa 13 2 �� s e�zs'�'E,� N� � 6500�m' �� D Q ,� � P p 5200� f4 � �°'�� W 61U0 �'� a M� �, ,� 2� � �/ ��! � � S'r o r—' r )y � �� °s��,1 � 104.93. � � a FAIP,F IS '� ,� � j 1-1 r� � � b � . a� � Q aa�a�' zs �w� ' s e9�Za' � tas � � r._fi �OS�` y9� , 2 S 89 25 36 E � °i 6� 5 2�'2YE ( 16S o �°`6 TRACT "C" � � � on,��W `� OPEN SPACE y�o � SO� / �6 � I ' .3 O�C, �+�g � �,O`� G� \\O, � 'y�0360 d ,O � -� � zo a3 � �� /� J � `s / GI ^ 3� _ �!ti'e43g E r -� :—+ �9 a.� \4T `V � � 670Q k �` 2 ' � I S B4O 25�36�� ,, .z, � . 0 IG .B c�'� �� W �� .:..J 6y� L.!' c ^ 1 �� S � M � �6 � , � 5900 ��► 6�� ysoo�0 27 $ �� iB�c. '° ? ^ �9 � � 3 h^ �g �L �� p Z�,�', N 89° 23� ' �5 96 - � �+ � !y N. 170 �} 'd7'25�36"W !c@u S 89°25�36`E 'fl ?'u, .CiOt}- 20 �oo ' 'v- i12.77 ��,� c� p. 28 17 a ��' � r�0 �' ,y .36 Ac. ' _'o ' c� r P m z 18 N� � IN�TIAL PT. - o 5 H9°25�36"E "� ��v • I, ilQ. . . 102.89 115 O S��'-�" 119.24 y,..,,., _ i .Q f3a.TI I04.35, . . ►... ! I70 �° • 939.52 . . . 6d�o- . . : . 7.. . - ... . .. . � `` f �r� S H9°25� 2{S�� 130 � � � �5 S 87' 25� 20"@.• .:� �5 w � '-�'�:�E 23 'f ! 1300 .��e, � " I�00 0 300 800 70Q ° 60p � ` \:. . , � r a � " �4oG ��''� 119 A r�xso'� �5 0 �_ 4 o n � 2 0 0 , � P :�` �� N o. \n"- `��,, !_, z __�_,l� '��9 � Z J r� z ' 2Q � ��,�,' 1 . ACT A� rya,�,.� 1 1 � �; 4 � y\� v `�t 30 TS �r �0 75~ 63.94 r p„� � '� ) ie � 052 'L � N.69 25 20 W �„� ,��• ��`• Na� 13,�94) ssa3� \�,ti. � FFH� fl �� # LH I�t� $ :>` . a, o` �?es ��" ,�`ti Q- � a `< .w� �,ti I500 � y ��w a9 �sASO �] � L '~� • ��J eo 75 se,.oz �'r� :�; SEE / �'q � . �� G3U� � �� 2(3 � lu L 2.5 #� � �; '7 y� 22op �,� .. �� 2�00 ' 3000 31Q0 2� � �; � ` I 2 /��8• n1P � .'3°` � m O � � � � 2 � W Y pl� �I p s?p �s'F. �`�' �, �� ,� yr � 1O O .0 � , °o M o'R"'- � o� IS� � , v N a� N 89°25�20°W °� N B9°25'2d'W� _ �` � vr 16 0 � $2 `�. � 9a�s�oz1''� ,� � m =(� � ioo - z . 2 0 � f � � I s,�,�s � �e �' �y"'�2100 2400 �,� � -- '� �.° 2$00 A� ,z � f Q ` N � �•L� a� �� ,Q.�' e F� `�.�i•�/ � Q � � 3 89°37'S7"W e � ! oo+ l7Q0 u' /,S� � .98 � ♦ 4c 59.90 85.10 �5 `. 25 .� _ fR� "@ 1y °a .. cr J N�0 104.g,s ? N 7g°29 43 � � +� N y`jn� � N 89° 42� E 170 �? � ��'J �b 'l �27 ` IIO.IS o� v' � � ' 3°�, P y '�^� � '° �'9 ��9g�� ' 3200 I � � s9,�a 2 2�JQ�J 2500 � �� ° � � 4Sf7 p�� ? N �i �� ns ! �+H i .�r • ( w/ y J:r. � .� �Q.� . �i n� �;t�-� r' _ � :.`r. rr,I R.1 h �^ ' c . f �, � .'Y�.. ��{�.��J °��, .. n� F.� rfv 1{, �JC o L �';1 a � 4 . �,,�\. N•� r � � Q�, � Ng• ^ - . „ �� c`�� '� r ��s O= 'hry`ry�° 6 rp u��' "^ � �C.$.�0. �3�� . . ' u�j i • � � Sc , a �`' . �INfTIAL °o^�-{C.S.No. (3,594) ° • i 5 99°$7'S7�� W P . z y i+ , �.9 , , . . (40 ,.. . . . . EA , .60 . . . .,,. . . .,160 . T� . S 89°42 W I'70 ,� _._._... , i. 33 WEST 25 3/10 RODS �p ; 5 89°4t� W 396.9 � � ! �� 'l ' ,C.. , c'.�G�,..�'-�c�� I'�`�G� ` °' i �0 3aoo 3300 � � � � �� , f Z� � c�4c. /.5/Ac. 35B Ac / ��c. I �i �� iC.S. No.�5544)' I �� ' 3 — ----- _. ., . ._.. ._ ___ �.. _ . ...�. _ _ .. . .. �. ..�.. . n , , e . ,.� �. , m ��°�� teI�phone 62�-5fi19 - P�Ir. and Mrs.. C1ark Feb. 2, 198� 13575 s.w. 115ih � �igard OR 639-0762 We proposes To add on. �' to the end of entire house, expanding the two � existing bedrooms. The ad.dition will match as close as possible to sxisting house. Build a �' cabinet next to the �xisting clodet in the masterbedroom to owr_er's spac- 1f1C:�.l,!Ur!_`�a, ��!� i,::,i l ��rtr� G��li�:�%�l ii�.ed W1Y1ClOW :LYI �T,Y1.2 m�,ster- bedroom for required light to meet cod�. Owner to do a11 painting. This bid does not inc3ude anyr carpe-�ingo TOTAI, COST. . . . . . .$6,470. 00 Cost o�° instaling a 6/Ox6/8 sliding glass door in the secong � bedroom. . . . . . . . . �F' . On •$' l5 �r � � WESTS I E RElUIODE � TNC. i � � John Ha1'v rs on ;.� • � .' �. � �' <4 12555 S1�'V s�x�r�e�c�°est driwe �� ' � ,�� ti�ard, o�eg�n � 97��3 ' � � ' � STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 �""'�� TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION JuJ.y 8, 1980 - 7;30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINI5TRATION OFFICES BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway - Tigara, Oregon DQCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZCPD 1-80 (Copper Creek) NPO #6 APPLICANT; TUALATIN DEVELOPA'IENT CO. , II3C. OWNER: SAME 153U0 SW 1.16th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: For a Zone Map Amendment from Washington County RS-1 to Ci.ty of Tigard R-5PD "Single Family Residential Plarined Development District'° for Stage I Copper Creek - General Plan Review. AND For a Zone Map Amendment from Washington County RS-1 to City of Tig�rd R-7PD for Stage II Copper Cr.eek - Preliminary and General Plan Review. LOCATIONs South of Durham Road, east of Serena Way at Pic.k's Landing Subdivision (Wash. Co. Tax Nlap 251 14B, Tax Lot 100) . i i PREVIOUS ACTION: � ; � 5 Original application was made on January 3, Z980. The Planning Commission � Tabled the original app�ication on March 18, 1980 to allow 5taff an d the � Applicant to work out major difficulties. Applicant requested that Stage I � be reviewed by the Planning Commission in a letter dated March 27, 1980. � �x On April 15, 1980, the Planning Commission agreed to review Stage T - twenty-three � (23) lot subdivision off Pick's Landing, Serena Way. On May 20, 1980, the Planning Coznmission approved the Preliminary Plan for Stage I with modifications to Staff Recommendations (Reference Minutes of May 20, 1980 Flanning Commi.ssion ' Meeting) . Applicant is now requesting General Plan approval for Stage I, R--5PD - which ' has been r�duced from twenty-three (23) lots to fourteen (14) lots. Applicant i is requesting a Preliminary and General Plan Review for Stage II, R-7PD. � STAGE I (R-5PD) COPPER CREEK Z. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR STAGE T, R°5PD: 1. Zone Change request is in conformance with the land-use designation in the Comp rehensive Plan. ! 2. Area has been zoned R-5 on the Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance Number 79-44 'i approved May 21, 1979, I 3. Durham Road abu�ting this property to the north is in substax�dard con�ition. ' A dedication of right-of-way to allow forty�five (45' ) feet from the ', :�i ?'i � . � � � ,.�;� �a . _ STAFF REPORT .� AGENDA 5.5, ZCPD 1-80 Ty.GARD P�z1NNING COMMISSION ��ly 8, y980 . � Page 2 centerline of Durham will be necessary to create the ninty (90') foot right--of-way in conjunction with future development on Durham. Applicant has agxeed verbally in the text to provide this dedication. 4. Sewer service is availa7�le to these lots through lines constructeci in relation to the development of Pick's Landing. 5. Lotting patterns have remain�d outside the sensitive land areas as requested by the Planning Commission on May 20, 1980. 6. Stage I contains fourteen (14) lots which has been reciuced from the original request for twenty-three (23) . This configuration resu'lted from the re-alignment of a street (cul-de-sac) t� se rve prope rty to the south. TI. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. Necessary right-of-way dedication on Durham Road should be made to the City. 2. Half-street improvements will be made t� Durham Road in the future. A +;" deecl restriction should be placed on each parcel which binds fihe property own�r to a Non-Remonstrance Agreement for this �,acal 2mprovement District. � ,; 3. The sensitive land axeas have been excluded from Stage I. However� a " r Homeonwers' Agreement should pro�ride for the maintenance of this area for both Stage I and Stage II. Furthex all improvements in the common are� including cutting and trimming of dangerous trees and limbs,brushing, trails, stream improvements, erosion cantrol, etc. , must be accomplished , as a condition of acceptance of public improvements. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Stage I - Copper Creek with the following conditions: 1. A Homeowner�° Agreement be prepared for the maintenance of the sensitive � land areas to the east of this site to include brushing, tree pruning, etc. prior to issuance of Building Permits. This Agreement shall be approved by the Public Works Director and the City Council. Should future d�velop- ment be approved for the remaining areas (Stage II) a similar Agreemerit shall be drawn to ensure that the complete area is maintained an d protected. 2, A restriction shal.l appear as a part of the Final Plat indicating that each parcel owner shall not remonstr�.te against the future .formation of a Local Improvement District to improve Durham Road. � i; i � }�: _ i: 'r� STAE'F REpORT AGENDA 5.5, ZCPD 1-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, 1980 Page 3 3. All public streets shall have fifty (SO' ) Feet r_ight--of-way, thirty-four (34') feet of paving. Sidewalks will be required on both sides of all streets except in cul-de-sac bulbs. 4, Necessary right-of-way dedication shall be made to provide forty-five (45' } feet from the centerline of SW Durham Ftoad to the property line along the entire nor{:hern boundary of this property. 5. Al1 Conditions under Title 17, Tigarcl Municipal Code, shall be adhered to in filing the Preliminary and Final Plat for review by the various depart- ments of the City. 6. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. � 7. Urading plans and construction plans on all public rights-of-way shall be " submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. r 8. Public water service and sanitary service shall be install.ed to this site ?' p rior to the issuance of a Building Pe rmit. � �; 9. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street ' � lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. � 10. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty (20) da a eal e riod from the date of a roval. Y PP P PP 11. That ,-�treet improvements be constructed to the approval of the £�ublic • Works Director prior to the recording of the Final Plat or issuance of Bui lding Permi,ts. 12. Al1 existing easements recorded. with this parcel shall be reviewed with Applicarat and the City pri�r to filing of a Preliminary Plat, i S'I'AGE II (R-7PD) COPPER CREEIC STAFF NARRATIVE '�, • : I There are severa�. portions of this application which need •�a be care:Eully � oonsidered by the Commission. The greatest concern of Staf� is the density issue. The NPO #6 Plan and the Comprehensive Plan designate the majo'rity cif � thE land in Stage II as R-7 "Singl;e Family". A very small portion at the ' lan d is desi.gnated R-20, Open Space and �loodplain. The Applicant has agreed to dedicate approximately 1.5 acres of floodplain to the City. The area a�S��atEa as Open 5pace in the NPO Plan wi11 not be bui.'�t upon. �o� 145 has been excluded until a later date. A l.arge area of sensitive land (s�eep slopes ancl drainageway) cuts the property north ta south. :`:� i �..�T � , . .. �= . ._ . . . .. . ., __- � S TAF`F RE PO RT AGENDA 5.5, ZCPD 1-80 TIGARD PLI�NNING COMMISSION July 8, 1980 Page 4 In the past, we have had a difficult time with density calculation unc3er the Planned Development District designation. In exchange for public dedication of open space, usually floodplain, we have allowed an applicant to increase the overall density of a project. Copper Creek Stage II presents a different picture. Staff has comg�uted the density as follows: Total Site Area 39.38 acres Less Stage I 2,.70 acres Less Lot 145 2.50 acres Less sensitive lands 11.50 acres 22.68 acres Less public improvements of 22� 4.98 acres STAGE TI BUILDABLE LAND 17.7 acres 17.7 x 43,560 square feet/7500 square feet = 103 Units, Stage I:C ; Lot 145 (later) � ` 2.5 x 43,560 square fset/7500 square feet = 15 " 118 � STAGE I l� �, 132 TOTAL UNITS � Now the only question remaining is should a "density bonus" be granted? Nnte thai� only 1.5 acres is an outright dedica•tion to Tigard. Note also that these calculations are for an underlying R-7 Zone . If you approve a highe r density, you reduce the size of each lot and you app roach the H--5 Zone zninimum lot size . As it is proposed, the average Iot size is 5800 square feet in Copper Creek. Minimum allowed in •the R-7 Zone is 7500 square feet. � i The "usable open space" issue needs attention. As no public dedication of this land is contemplated by the app licant, Staff suggests that all improvem�nts to the open space areas be made at the same time as the public improvements are done. A11 underbrush, dead vegetation, etc. shall be removed, the drainageway shall be cleared and paths shall be installed, erosion control shall be accomplished. Staff suggests a public dedication for park purposes of the open space to the south and a dedication �f the floodplain. If this were done, it would be possible ta consider a small "density bonus" for the remainder of the project. Open spaae and floodplain was dedica�ed to the City in Pick's Lan ding. It is our suggestion that th� park area be � continued �hrough Copper Creek to Cook Park. I _ _ _ _ J � STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5, ZCPD 1-80 TIGARD PLT�NNING COMMISSION July 8, 1980 Page 5 Lot 145. Applicant prop�ses to develop this paroel at a later date. Staff � is concerned that access to Durham Road will become an issue and we, therefore, suggest that a twenty-five (25' ) foot frontage road strip be de�icated to the south of and alc�ng Durham Road to serve later development in this a�:ea. The "temporary" aceess to Durham Road will be discantinued if a Local Tmprovement Distrir,t for Durham Road is formed or when Kneeland Estates is developed. 'I'he setback standards vary from the underlying zone designations anc� the Commission should examine them caref ully. Applicant has pzepared typiaal lotting patterns and proposed building .location:s for review at the public hearing. � The "Declaration of Conditions and Resi�rictions" is not specific enough j relative to the deed restrictions for Non-Remonstrance Agreement for the � : improvement of Durham Road. Specific language should be added. The "Model ; House" Ordinance of -the City should be used as a guideline by the applicant. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: l. This portion of Copper Creek is designated on the Comprehensive Plan as R-7 and R-20. There is app roximately 1.5 acres of floodplain included on the Tualatin River. Applicant dnes not propose to develop in the ,,: R-20 area (5,47 acres) designated as open space. " � tl .i 2. The NPO #6 P1an denotes an area o� apen space between tkie flaodplain and �;� the 132 foot elevation. Applicant does not propose ta develop in this area. t'� 3. Approximately fiv�e acres of this property is drainageway. J 4. Applicant has requested that Lot 145 not be developed at this time (2.5 acres) . '.',' 5. Density calculations would allow approximately 103 units to be built on buildable portions of site. Underlying 7one is R-7 with 7500 square feet per lot as a minimum. The majority of the lots presented in this p roposal '� are below the minimum allowed by Code. Under the P1annEd Develapment designation, an increase in density could be allowed. The Planning � Commission has considered this increase in the past, if the developer � cledicated land for public use. Applicant has agreed to dedicate 1.5 acres of floodplain. 6. All public rights-of-way are shown as fifty (50' ) feet dedio.ated with � � full-street improvements. i IT. CONCI,L75IONARY FZNDINGS: 1 l. Applicant is proposing a density �ove the R-7 Zone allowances. '1'he ! Planning Commission must decide whether or not to allow t.his density under �`a a Planned Development designation. �� 2. The drainageway C1Qari.nc� and irnprovement shauld be carefully reviewed with , Ap�lioant to ensure that the area is protected and maintained. ':� , :i ;;';i i � �, S � t , ;,;� STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5, LCPD 1-80 TTGA12ll PLANNING COMMISS20N July 8, 1980 PagP 6 3. Deed restrictions need to be added to ensure non-remonstranee against the im�rovemznts to Durham Road in the future. 4. All open space and floodplain areas should be dedicated to the City to continue i�he park area along the Tualatin River. 5. Future devel.opment of Lot 145 should be subject ta Planning Commission approval. Access to this parr,eZ should not be to Durham Ftoad. 6. A bus shelter and pull-off lane should be provided along Durham Road to make use of public transportation to serve the future needs of prospective residents. IIT. STAFF R.ECOMMENDATION: Staff recomm�nds approval of the Preliminary Plan for Stage II with the ; following conditions: _-- � l. Planning Commission to dictate specifzc density for Stage II. � � 2. Lot 145 to be presented before the .Planning C:ommission'.at a later date. No a access is to be allowed to Durham Road and twenty-five (25' } foot dedicated � strip l�e provided now �to ensure service to parcels. Plans be submitted l for Public Works Director's approval prior to Building Permits being issued. � 3. Temporary access to Durham Road be allowed until Kneeland Estates is � developefl at whi.ch ta.m� temporary access sha11 be removed. Public '; tr.ansportatian skielter and bus turn-aut lane shall be provic�ed on s Durham Roacl for use by property owners. Design p.lans to be submitted '? � for review prior to issuance of Building Permits for Stage IT. 4. Speczfic plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Director for all work proposed iri the dr.ainageway. Plans shal]. be approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of any work on the site. ; ! 5. Deed restrictions shall be made a part of the Declaration of Conditions and Restrictions clearly stating that each property owner shall agree not , to remonstrate again.st the future impz�ovements to Durham Road. This , sta•tement shal:l be included on each deed, and if it is nc�t, Tualatin '' Davelopment Company, :�nc. , the Applicant, hereby agrees to sign a Non- � Remonstrance Agreement for the improveznent of Durham Road for the entire parcel being considerefl as Sta_qe I anc� S�age �T �opper Creek. i ; � � � � � � � j .. , . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .... , ... STAFF E2EPORT � AGEND�, 5.5, ZCPD 1-80 ` TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION J'uly 8, 19IIU Paqe 7 6. Al1 lands below the 130 foot elevation south to the Tual�tin River shall be dedicated to the City of Tigard for open space/parx pizrposes. A metes and bounds leqal description for this land shall be made a part of this dedication. Dedication shall be made prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits f or any unit constnxcted izi Stage II. 7. A bus shelter and turn-nut lane shall be designed for Durham Road abutting this property. Plans shall be approved by the Public Works Director and Tri-Met prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits. 8. Applicant shall apply for persons to operate a model house in conjunction with this development. All signs within this developmen�t shall be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to installation, 8. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied an d inspections I verifying this have been carrie d out by the appropriate department. � �I 9, No minor lanci partitions shall be made in referenae to this project unless formal application is made to t:ze City of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. i� 10. No ch�anges will be made to appro�ed plans or specification� unless formal ' application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are ' approved by that department. Application £or changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. � 11. Grading plans and construction plans an all public riyhts-of-way shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of werrk. 12. Public water service and sanitary service sha11 be installed to this i site p'rior to the i�suance of Building Permits. � 13. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street li htin installations shal]. be a roved b the Public Works Director. � J 5 PP Y , 14. No Building Permits shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty II (20) day appeal period from the date of approval. � 15. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits, however, �� all improvements shall b� made prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 16. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public i Works Direct�r. prior to the recording of tYie final plat or issuance of ��, Buildiny Permits. 'i �4 � � I� I � �� i_�; , � f,., ,� '-i STAFF RE�P4RT � AGENI�A 5.5, 7CPD 1-80 � ' TIGI�RD PLANNING COMMTSSION Ju1y 8, 1980 Page 8 !,', � STAFF COMMENT: Approval of the General Plan for Stage II should be a decision made by the Planning Commission following a public hearing. If the Commission is satisfied ' with the applicant's presentation and feels that all the issues can be resolved, then Staff recommends approval of the General Plan. Approval oi' the General Plan will be subject to the preceding�iconditions. � ;.;� ;, t; ��, t" Prepar.ed and approved by A d, Planning Director i a 4- l; �; ) �: � F i 1 � -�,._ , . . .. :, , . AGENDA 5.6 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION July �3, 1980 - 7:30 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 S W Pacific Highway, Tigard NO STAFF REPORT FOR 11GENDA 5.s PLEASE SEE ENCLOSED ATTACHMENTS. � �t .� . ___- _ _ _ _ _ :Narris-McMonagle Associates, Inc. . ENG[NEE.RS•SURVEYORS 8905 S.W. COMMIERCIAL STREET � ? '�IGARD.OREGON 97223 Teleph�ne 1503)639-3453 June 13, 1980 City of Tigard Planning Corr�nissian • Mr. Aldie Howard T � S. �!. Main St. 242 Tigard, �Jregon 97223 �e: 8onita Industrial �aric Genzlemen: After consulting witi� the Planning Director, we would like to requ�st that tne Planning Commfssion proceed w�t� an infarr.ial concept review. We were reluctant to appear with a negative r�cormtenda�ion by tne ' staff. How�ver, subsequent discussion has shown how same nf the con- �° cerns may be resolved. Since we need the comnission's input in tne direction �o take, we would like i;o r�view the concept with you. please reschedule �onita Industrial Park for the July 8th meeti;�g. �8est`'`�eg `.�i�'f.-�" -_. __ � ._ - _ � Harris-�cPlonagle Associa es, nc. EEE:ds � . . . . . . . . . ' P.M1 ` � , � � i • I � STAE'F REPORT � � AG�NDA 5.7 ��` TI�ARD PLANNING COM,�SISSTON May 20, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. ' Fowler Junior Fi�,gh - Lecture Room j 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard. j DOCKET: ZODIE CNANGE PI�ANNED DEVELOPr�NT DISTRICT, ZCPD 13�80 and ' ' SENSLTIVE LANDS PERMTT, NI 3-80 (FZITTLESODI/BROWN) APPLICANT: Raymond J. Kittleson and OWNER: L. R. Davis and Mil.ton O. Brc�m R. M. Starkweather Rt. 2, Box 474K 7415 SW Bonita L�� Center, ;�iashin�ton 98629 Tiglyd, Qr�qo;� 9722.3 APPLICATTON DA�'E: 4/30/80 REQUEST: For a Prelimi.nary Plan Review for a Planned Unit Development in a Light In3ustrial Zor.e and Zone Map A,�c2n8.ment for A,) R-7 "Single Family Residential" to M-3PD "Light Industri.al �one Pl.anned Devalopment District" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1, �'ax Lot 1400; B) M-3 "Light Indus'trial Zone" ta bi-3PD °'Light Industrial Zone Planned Development Distr:ict" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot ?00 and Tax Map ZS1 12BA, Tax Lcrt 100. �' `4� �. LOCATION: 7415 SW Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1, Tax Lo� 1400 and Tax Map 2S1 12BA, Tax Lot 100 and Tax Map 251 12A, Tax Lot 700� . I. FTNDINGS �F FACT: � l, Tax I,ot 1400 appears to be ve ry close to eighty (8A�) percen� within the one-hundred�-year floodplain of Fanno Creek which is a desa.gnated' qreenway area. Z'he majority of land on Tax Lot 70Q is in the floodplain and designated Greenwaye Tax Lot 100 is about fifty (50�) percent �iir the floodplain/' greenway. The adopted Comprehensive Plan Map clearly defines these areas and fu.ture reference is made to these areas in the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan adopted by Council in August of 1977. 2. Policies 1 through 6 on pages 9 through 11 of the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan clearly indicate that these arnas are to be protacted� 3. Chapter 18.57 Sensitive Lands, Section .010 Statement of Tntent states "Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuitable for developmPnt taecause of locatian within the one-hundred-yeax floadpl.ain. .. ." I Section 1$.57.020 Definitions undex "�zeenway" statcs "GrE�nw�s i,:,�, .. _ � a11 lands within the one-hundred-year �Zoodplain of Fa��no Cree:h. atz� �`ii�e II Tualatin River and the lands on either side of natural drainage ways as designatad by the Park Board and Co.mprehensive Plan for greservatian". � _ _ � f M �� ' STAFF REPQRT ACENI7A 5.7/ZCPD 13-80, M 3-�0 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION `� � May 20, 1980 . Page 2 4. Section 18.57 Sensitive Lands, Section .040 Uses and activities allowed , with a Spe.cial Use Pe�nnit does allaw fill, grading, structures, an.d off- � street parking, and service dr�.ves, however, 5ection .C?60 Special Use „_ Pexmits is very specific in reqtu.ring defiai].ed submission of documents to mQet the string�nt requizements af the Code.. T'hese documents have � nat been subznitted in detai.I. 5. Applicant's narxative rel.ati.ve ta sensi�3.ve lands states - "The open space in -the floodplaa.n, e�cluding par?cinq axeas, consti.tutes �orty (4O�s) percent of the total site". No calculations have been submitted wrhich cl.�arly indicate the ac�ual, precise, measureme:n�s of proposed building areas, parking areas, sexvice drive axeas, etc. in relationship • to floodplain and greenway areas. 6. No mention is inade a,n this appli.cation abQUt a service drive to the nort.h. Cu].�de-sac length cannot exceecl 40Q fee� withou� a Variance being gzanted by �th� Planning Commissian. No Variance application has been received. A sea-trYee driwe does appear on the sit� plan, however, no property d�dicatian is on file which would make this driva possil�le at this tiu�. No railroad crossing permi.ts are incZuded in this application. ;t::: y . Proposed street �rom Honita north is 2500 �ee� long appro:.imately, and �`s'` is only twenty (20') feet wide. A s�andard Aocal street, a public . street, is mandatinc� with .tart�� (4Q') fe�t of paving at th� mi.nimuza„ Tha.s street cnuld eventually become a part of a laxg�r system serving i a Iarger ar�a, These concerns are share d by the I'ire Maxshall. At least two ingress/egress points ar� mzndatory. 7. Tigard Wate:r District to install main lines to mai,n systexn to insure adequate fire-flaw to tiv,s projact, '�'he Fire Marshall insists upon t:his as a aninimum requi.rement_ TI. CONCLUSTONARY FINDINC',S e 1. Propns�d uses se riously violate the exp ressed purpose and iratent of the Cc��-�r_�=�.-=� ^'-�� _�:-=*=�n ^f fZ��dplai_n a..�1 greenway ax�.d Enviranmental -- --- - �------- pp�n ci�� p1�n an�1 fihA �.n_1 i ri_f?� ..L'>t�t13.n�r1 �.n thP Environmenta.l Design � and t�en S�.ace Plan are not addressed a,n submitted d,ocuments. 2. '�he �ranspartatian system is not appropriate based upon preliminary review by the k'ire 17epartm.en.t�. No °Pscape" raute is shown. No Variance *___ rw::.<�� - . . �_... e e.� _r,.y � L rE�L1-..�� __...� � �::__ o�:� c: �.i:s.- .�,.:°.��C :.Gilgiil. e°w�v� �D0 feet. 3. No rai.lroad crossing permi�s have been granted by the Public Utilit,ies Coromission. xhis will b� necessa�.y to serv� this sit�. Th.� arrow "to Hall Boul.evard" across the north of the plan seezns fio have been added `�'`'� f �'�,�,� as an "after thought". No mention is znade caf this stxeet aZignment in �`� the narrati,ve e o� t..'�.'.�:�.. .�: ... . ...... _ . ..: .. .. . . . . . . . . . k . . �� • + . �� . ,��_ ��. k. • � �� STAFF REPORT ii AGENDA 5.7/ZCPD 13-80, M 3-80 ' TI�ARD PI,,'�Y�iNING COrP'i1ISSIQN � r.� � . May 20� 19a0 r Page 3 �. �;; The ingress/egress point on Honita Road should align with 74th Avenue. . �`' ' Z'his intersection is just below an elevated railroad crossing and wil]. � creafi.e a serious hazard unless applic�nt can resolve the site distance '— �I d'Lfficulties. . p�, III. STAFF RECaN1MENDATION: �'� �. Staff recommends the Denial bf this Preliminary Plan with no appeal to Cit�r i' Cauncil. When Staff is satisfied that the Eollowing condifiions have been �,I me�, the applicant shall re�urr_ at the Pr.el.i�ni.nary Plzx�. Review stage before the Planning Comrai.ssion. � � I'i 1. Calculation be submitted showing building coverage related to floodplai.n, ;� . ' greenwa�r, open space, parking, easements, driveways, etc. Basis for � ' these calculations shall be taken from the Tigard Municipal, Code_ Staff �y feels that without these calculations, wre cannot evaJ.uate this proposal. } i 2. Rttention be give.n t,o a public s�reet systerc� throughou� th.is praject � connecti.ng to eithex Hall Bou�evard or 72nd Avenue. App].icant to have � applied for and been granted a railroad crossing pexznit for either �� loca�ion. A Ietter £ram adjoining prope rty owners consenting to dedicated " ` ri.ghts-o�-way through said p roperty shall be in evidence. � 3, More a�tention. shall be given to the intent and pur�ase o� the Sensitive I,ands Special Use Permit. As submitted, this plan avoids the impoxtan� concerns of protecting and maintaining the flar�dplain and gr�enway areas. 4. Standard City Streets be provided with at least two (2) ingress/egress . points - one (l� on Banita and possibly two (2) to the z�arth. 5. All concerns of the Fire Marshall must be sata,sfied priar ta further� zeview by the Planning Commission. . � � � . rd, Planning Director . , T' l.�,3 L .. � .., _ . . ,,`� sy��` • ' . ' - _ ,I _ . . . . . . :- , . � _ �� j,:-i i u 4;L �a;� ��l 1�-I� '�i�� _ _�i�.� �_`' •,� •, '%/ `-�� l J��`,�� _ j } _ _ , � > :� ' i � �. �,�. � �,��-� -,r. "� �� / ----� .� � 1�3i�� ,>- �� {�. 1��_`�j�� '__ _ (1` _ "_ 1'v / e.�"� / / (_(' ( � �f/ll .\ 1 � i� (� +� � 1.— lJ '4�� ~ ,� � � - - • 1 •\ � � � 1 � / _ ��. 1. _ 7��llp q3��p� - 7 '� -— — 4 �, �.` .� � \/ � / ��: �! ..��lf��LL11IS�a:I��., . .: , _.._ .._—. / / . � . r.� ��: . { � � � � � �� , - � . � .� _ . . �, a- - - - — . - - , - r ,�:� - �`� �� - _ _ � ` ., , � I � , � . � ., 1 � � . . - s� - � '� � � , rj� � , _ � . , .l;�,y � `� � � - "'s __L t • ."'�. ' � �-S � _ �� ' _ _ v ----�- � --�-- �-- �� '� �1 � 1 _ . --- -- - - i �- �.;� �, _ _ _ t- � .� ��,/ , `��, �- .. --_ -- � --y1�� .� �--- � , � .� .— ,T— �.�.l �t .�, . i - - ' 6_-; if r� � � `�:•� °' ' � � � � � , - f � . l ,�� _.� � , � _,, /. i ,r`�,� , �t� ,� � -=• ..,. , � �, ( , ��I �„ b' Y►'� �.��. �'• .... / /' � • / - ��. _ �-�._ . ,' i Y! • ,�� ` \ / i � �-� � / __ '�_. +s - - � �• a' �---� _ -- ___-- -_ �.� � �, - .1. T--� - — _ ,.0 � a.� � � / .,, _= ,__ _ .� ..°1� - � � :� r..�,�� ' • ' -_;�----- • _ .- -. -�- � _ � � .___. '._ .__. -.. _ .._ . � ., y �.• -' . - S � _._� - � � _.-. . � �S ' �--.___ .- -°� / . � _ •--- - - �� — ` / � ' _' _.' � � . �,� � ^! € - o _-— � �� , � -�---r �� - - � ' _ rt �.. . : 1 � ., i .� _ .�..., ;�e ., �s �•'� a 1 �' •f� � _ . ` � � -- � � - l -- � _% a� I .1 � �-�--1-�� - ' � � - i r i � \ i � 1� , i � �� .r�, . ..,� - � \ � �/ � .\✓� ` � ' � ` `- . �. l�.��'L�,�._i� � , t - � l�j_�_3.��1_�:< < .l��i ` _.] �� i � ��► _}_- _ - ,` � � - �__ •.� - � 1 �1 _ - 1---- — I � ; -��- � �� 4i1?l l:'!�I 1 i��:l ��l� ,.. - ,�.� ;.. .. � �;� . f— � ,.-_- Er�� __ �� j��►n �� r�� -__ _ _ _ � , . - m � E � 'j �u.,-� �, r �} _ .�l1:_1 @Ii�� --- --�� ,� °r��_ y�` �� .� �.u�']C-°� ��, - - — � , � � a _ L.�_�l[. � ., �_ . � �', - � �--=f� �,;;,,�Ga C'yM y c�::. ��.:-...-;s �.c �_ i � - � � - � f ^_ � �` ._. . - -- � ��7A1��r,�lk.wdl�.k,/M► r�A�.►�++k�'�SV'4"i^f , , ..+.r�...;T.;^� .,�1 x .tFt"., � �. _ I • �.a��. .�. . �. � . .. . �,,,i.7r .•a,tlt �a.w��riYS�','jF,Y^"Cd'°� '�'�,,, s1.�y,�� .rp � • '`t. .`{.C� �� 'i ztr� �t rx�°{il�i�k i ''i�� iTfl! ii� r�j 11� l i � i Yj� S�wwa�R�'.. .��i't1?taS..':�"F_4.}'1k'a �n� `5� 'iL ;k t�:q�u� "ti� y k. �. { � �. � .� F. wY.-> .�� i`?�''C``1"� ;$�3��3 ii r s' S•°� �' � ,F� ;r• ��i 4 rti' {,!�'`';�r.it. '�x`�"�,� � �. �+��t p� � ,`� .�p,i�' ., � 4 !. � � . .. '�:i"i�.f �,, ,��:i', �F° '� ,' �P �� 'i` y�� ;Y �'� i`. � ae� g h ��,_�u � A� �. =k t :v '� 3 �Y' � N:�� •� ��r� 't , s � �t� a'- _ , , ,s� . .�d'..';..� ,.3 4r. �:.�:r y. Ti' Y �,,: -!. .. � t_ � r "L ;,.,r.. :,4 } �- x��, � �a- .{�� r: ��:'� - �r s ,�, , _.�. ' . ':��}�,,:��`f ` . S ' 'S_ �Y _ . .'� .. ' . . . . ;, j<v�-i.;�y� . - :�. - �j �_ �f!_._.�-- "+ '' , -- - S.ee},4 �„k�;. �: . � _ `. _ - . _ . . � . ' _... _.. _. . QF.. �_:;.... '�'f� ..