The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 05/20/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. , : .� �` �; AGENDA ( TIGARD PLANIdING COMMISSTON �;., May 20, 1980 - 7c3D pam. �,: Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard r 1. Open Meeting: ' 2. Roll Call; 3. Appro�ral of Minutes from Previous Meeting i 4. Planning Commission Communication: 5. Public Aearing: i`. A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation i� C. Public Testimony 1. Proponent's 2. Opponent's � 3. Cros�-Examination t 5.1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 14-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 7-80 and SENSITIVE LAND5 PERMIT, M 4-80 (Senior Citizen Center} NPO #1 5.2 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 11-80 (Patricia Jacobsen) NPO #1 �� "" 5.3 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 12-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, C'U 6-80 (Eaker and Associates) NPO #1 5.4 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 8-80 and CONDTTIOI�AL USE, CU 8--80 and VARIANCE, V 5-80 (Alpha �roperties) NPO #7 � s 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 29-79 (Winter Lake) NPO #7 '� �, 5.6 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DTSTRTCT, ZCPD 1-80 (Copper Cxeek) NPO #6 '� i 5.7 ZONE CHANGE PZANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, 7CPD 13-80 and SENSITIVE LANDS f' PERMIT, M 3-80 (Kittleson/Brown} NPO #5 i � 5.8a ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-SO (City of Tigard) 5.8b ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 4-80 (City of Tigard) 6. Old Business; � 7. New Bixsiness: 1 8. Other Bus'iness: 9. Adjournment �.. MINUTEB `PTGARD PI,AI�NIN4 COI�It�lZSSIOPi MaY �'a, 1g80 - 7:3� P.m. Fowlsr Jun;Lor Aigh Schoo� - Zecture Room 10$65 SiX Ydal!�ut ��. - �'ig�rd, Oregan In Che �.baence of Psesident Teped�no, Vice President Speak�r � ENED t�ue meetin� at 7:35, ROLI. GA.LL: Present; Bonn, Funk, He1�er, H�rron, YColleas, Popp, Smith, Spe�ker Absent; Tepodino Staf�« Huw�rd' Ross The M7NUTE�S of the April 22 meeting a►ere eonsidered, and on ; motion of Popp, aecondad by Kolleas, ths �r,i�nutes vrere approved as submitted. TY�are v�ere no CONIMUNICATION� to be heard at tkci,s t:tme. The president read the usua7. notice o� autharity for and 7Procedure ta be fnllmweci in the maeti.ng' and a�ser�ed the piT$LIC HEA�dTNGS porti�n og the meeting. 5.1 7.y0NE CHANG� PLANNED b�V�LOPM�TT DISTRICT, ZCPD �4-80 and ; CONDI�IQNAL USE, CU 7-80 and SENSTTIVE I,ANDS F�RpiIT, �� M �4-80 (Senior Citi.zen CentRr) �tk�p #1 �� A request b� William R. Bruner for a �ione Mr�p Amendment with a Preli.�ninary and General Pro�ram Revi_ew request �rom R�7 "Sin�le F�tmi.ly �eeidential'+ to R-•7PD "Single Fam3.7.y Resi- dential Planned Deve].opmen� Dietr�.c�'o and a requ,�st �o�r a Conditionrzl U�e �;o bui.�.d a ,enior C�.tizen Center on 3.257 acres located at �he corner of O�M�ra and Ed�e�roorl Streets � (4Yas'h. Ca„ TEUt �Iap 2S1 2DB, Tax Lo� 690). I Hovrard read thaSTAFF REpq�?T and RECOMMENDATION;S. He also read inta tbe ,record a letter from Gary Chamberlai�n, ad�ace�nt �iroperty ;� owner, $8�5 S� O�Mara, �aising various ques�ione arid exgres�in� corac�rn�. Ho�axd e�splai.ned p],ane to have the Site Design Revie� mentionsd in Cor�diti.on, 10 a pub:iic mee�ing, at whi�h questions and concerns pf a11 ; interested �.ndividuals could be aired and resolved. He cal7.ed attQn�tic�n ? �� chang�s in the original design xhioh xeflect response ta �ome af � the �oncerns mentio�ed. + � ,� The A:PPT�,IG�ANT�;� pRESENTpTION xrms made by Willia�n Bruner of John �� l�y1e, aroh3,tec�s, ,519 ,5W Tt��.r�l Avonue� portland. xe oxplaiaaed bri.Qfly the featurea ��d some of the thiags that xill yet be addraesed, � , ;,; i :'i i � , i , 1 � � � �1 � . . MIIJU TES `�'ICrARll PLANNING COMMTSSIOI� Kay 20, Z93o �age 2 PIPHI,IC �E.ST� IMONY: S�eaking in. fa�oa� r�� he propoea2; �*!" Nancy Stimler, City Councilwoman, 1�.525 SW Terrace Trail,s, and chair.mau of the comntitt�a w':hich selecteri the site and the a�rc'hitea� and which has worked t�ri.th the Archai,tect i�o this po�.nti. She told brief].y of the r►or2� whic,h has gone i�nta �Y►e pro3ect thuB far by the commi�tee, and e$pressed con£idence �he problems whic.h rema3.n can be worked out wi�.h the neighbo�s and th� cotaanuni�y at the s3.te design public maet�.ng. She urged passa�s of the 7one Chartge and Condltional Use requesxs s� the pro�ect csn �o to b�d as soon a�� pa$sible. *+�* Madel3xio Hill, 8855 �W 0'Mara, favor�d the pr��ec� b�t que��ioned the planning for what ap�ears to b� a btzd �n�rance o�to a narrow, curved road. This aras deemed a propex sub�ec� for �ite ; d�si�gn r�view. SPeakiag in opporsition ware tha followiag; +�*�► G�x�� Chamberl.a�n (le��er �1r�.t�r ab�ev�) , who �avored tt�e project but obae�ted to l.aok of not�ce to tYae n�ig:hborhood. Tie W�s �aured tY►ea°� r�ould be publicit� about th� u�acom3ng site design xeviert me�tiag, �x whieh hi�� eone�xns t�uld re�eive at�ent�.on. *�* Pat �iatct►lson of Y�PQ �1 referred �o a le�ter w.hiela w�� sen,t to the Plamt��.ng Diree�or but nnt :Lnclud�d i.n ths commis�ion's pac�et. �ioWard read this 3.etter, whic'�► expre�sed co�cern about the en�raaxae of the p�o�ect in�o t�se Sscura� in �J°k4ara ��r�ae't, anc� reque$tin.g opportuni�Cy to �ive input at tlxe site desigx� reviex lev�sl. She �ras as�ured the NPQ vrould receiv� �xitten notice of this me�ti�g. There �vas no C�ROSS��X,�TbTATZON AIdD REBUTT' offex�ed. COMM�Ia�STO_,N DISC�ION A,ND �C�s Popp rai�ad �'h� guestion of p�rl�ing �paces, urging full compliance xi.th the Coda nr a reguasY. for , x . vari,anGe ther�from. HoKard explained �he cons�rainta imposed by ' financin�. Discussio�n led �o additien ot Cand3.tion No. lle �BA com» pacted gravel psirk.ing �pace shall be provided tm meet the Cod� requi,re- m�n,1t to the nor�h of the buildin� in �he fctture p�arking areaan Funic �nquired al�out the eight�inc2a seper line, �rhich �ppear� to be.funded r�s part o�! the project� snd ie not in a ma�or dra:Lna�e ba�3.�. �ioldae� raised t,he question of hal� etreet 3.tnp�oeemen:tp, �ven thou�h thq ,straet �rontage is Bma11 en t'hi.s pro�ex"ty. �ondl�ion 12 r►as a�reed to reqaire half street impravement� along Q'�Ma�a::S'�reet, Sonn M�� appraval of ZCPD 14-80� C'U 7-8� �d 'M �-$0, bae�d on ptaff findings and recomraendat�.ons, but in.cl�ding C,ondition �1 vrith ;,i MTNUTES �IGA.RD PLAl`dNTNG COMI�iTSSION �[ay 20, 19�0 Pa�e 3 respect to parkin� spacea, and Gandition 7.� calling far a half �treot impravdtnento The motion was sQCOnd�d bq Helmer and carri.ed unanimously. �.2 'LONE C�IA.N(�E, ZC 11-80 (Patricia 3acobsen) NPO �1 .A request by Patr3.cia Jacobsen for a Zoae l�a� Amendntent from Washin�f:on CQUnty RU�4 '�o City of '�igard R�-7 '�Single Family Itesidential�' lacated at 9$50 SW Garrett (Waeh• Co• ��zx Map 251. 2C�, Tau� Lat y.00)a �iovla:xtl re�d the 5T� REPORT and RECOMMENDATIOIdS. Thera was nei�hsr an APPLIGAKT'S PRESENTATION nor any PUBLTC TEST.��• COMhI,,,�I�S,�TO1V DISC�„�TSSIOPT A�,�„o,N ,D AC ION: Popp MO.,,.VED for approva7. of ZC 11�80 basecl on stafY finding;s and recommendat3�one. �'he mo�tion Was seconded by Kc�lleas ar_d caz°riad unan3.rriausly. 5.3 �� G�s �� 12'°�� and CONDITIONAL USE GU 6�80 (Eaker �and l#�ssociates) N� #� A req,rxest by �aker and Associat�s for a Zone Map Amendmen� fz�om C-3 ��General Cnmmerc3.alp� to C�P '�Commercial Profess�.vnalb �nd a Conditlona�. II�e request for a professional office bui.lding on .9? acres located at 13620 S�Y Pac�.Fic Iiighway (Wash, Gn, 'Pax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lvt 900)• �ioward read the STAFF RB�1ZT and RECOMMEND�ATIONSo T�e ex�lai.n�ci the uses arid confirmed there was no conf:lict betwe�n the proposed uses and tk�e gaverning ordi.nances. 7'tie APPI,IC,�,_ANT�S PRWE5 NT.ATTON v►as made by Jexry Eal�er, Lak,er and Aesociates, arahitec�s and planners, 12655 SW Center, Beaverton. He e�eplained the retail uses which will oacupy the retail epace in the pro�ect. He had noth3,ng further to add to ttss s�aff report. , PtT�C TES'P�IM�OPI.Y was offered by Jv B. H�.shop, Sui�Ce 303, 10505 S�'V Barbur Blvd•� Portlan�i, a�rn�ar of property aeross the hig.hway and ta �he north of the ad,�oining property. He expressed conc�rn that proper notice r1a�s not glven ad�oining property ovrners; th�t th�.s proposal ,bad not been refexred to or rdviexed by the NP0 {�1; that �rhile an entz�r�nce to th9 Heinz pxoper�y to the north was called for by �he staff, no arrangements for nor disctzss�.on af such a stree� tl�rough properties to the north rras had with �tle affected proper�y ov►ners (Heinz and �3ishop). He raised the question of st�rm dxainmge I il: � NITI�UTES TIC�I►RD PLANNING GOMMISSION May 20, 1980 Pa�ge 4 vi.a the storm se�ver for the apartment complex to the south. His pac�.n:cipal cunc�rn� ho�rever� was wi.t,h the 3.mpact� of wha� apgaren�ly 3:g con�emplated as acce�e throug.h adjoj,nin� properties w�.thout notifica- tion or consultation with t,he a�fected property ownexso CROS5rEXAMINATION 1�D FlEB,�,,,� UTTA�s Nlr. Eaker e�pla�.ned the px�oject vrould wurk �th or w�.thout the provision far access tcr tha nort.h, but that he was working in accordance wit� sta#'f direc��.on �.x� this tnatter• He expl;ained the sewe�r ea.eemon�. Howmrd stated .he had a r�e�urned anvelope containing na�ice to Mr. Bi�hop and abaut four others, incJ.uding Mr. He3nZ. Iie told o� p�st discus�ione w3th Mr. Bis.hop and others �,t �ar3,aus times in, t�►e p�s� �,� years� and recounted sim�lar ef£orts (not a11 successf�u3.) in ge�ting propert9 ovYners to coopea°Ate a.zx plans For streets to afPord �ood circtxlat�nn, He indicated the eite desi�n, rev�.ew level would be the next step. Funk asked how site de�ign review �rorke, and by wttom. Howard e�plainad. Mr. B3.�hop reiter�.ted his displeasure a� not t�ein$ con,aulted on a mattex that affects ttie futurQ deve].opment oi his paropert�r, but was assured he r�ould t�e invalved in the sits desi�n rauiew p�ocess, whera his concerns would b� cons�.�iered. Funk and Smi�h felt �his issue should be resolved, and �h� a�atua of �h� present 20 f�ot and praposed 3Q foat acce.as onto tY�e highr�ay was exp�.ored. COMMISS�ION DI5GU�,S�TO�T A„�dD AC�TON: Smith uxged the commi'ssion require �n �v�ailable access to the r►orth. After cansiderabla disGUSSi.on � Howard offered the fo17.oWing a� Coudition No. 1�: ��Narth�rn accees to be ag�eed by pro�erty oxmers, bu� the access will ex�.c��; add strest plu.g; sit� de�ign r�view pz°ocess to include these p�rtiee." Bonn MOVED approval �f Lone ChFxnge ZC 12•80 r�nd C�ndi�ianal TTse 6«8A based on staff findings and recamm�ndat�ons�, plus the addition af Condition 4 above. The motipn w�s seconded by Kolleas and carx�,ed unanimously. i �he presi,dent declared a five—minute recess. ; � l 5,4 7A�iE CAAN(3E FLANNED D�V�LOPMEN� DISTRICT, ZGPp 8+�8� an.d CQNDI�IONP:T, USE, Ci� 8*-�0. and VAR�ANCE, V �-80 (Alpha Propex�i�s) NPO' �#'T 1� request by A1�ha Propa�xties �or a Zo�ne Map Amendmeint �.th a F�aliminary �nd (�en�r,al Plan Pragram Review requeet from Washington Ct�u.n�y �tiT-4 to G1�y of Tigard R»7PU �'S1ng1e Family Resident�.a1, P].anned Develo�nent Aistrict!� and a reque�t for Condit�onal IIee to build duplex (at�ached single fam�ly) wy.�.ts and a Variance request for a cul•�de-sac � . r �,.� _ 1�czNtrT�s TZGARD PLAI�TDTING CONINIISSIUN May 2p, 1980 Page 5 loca�ed at 10t�35 �� North Dakottt u�reet (Wash. Coa Ta�c Ma� 1.S 1 34b�4;, '��x T,o t 5.00),. Richard 8eed read the ST_ AFF FtEPO�tT and 1�COt�lMENDATIONS. Th� APPLIGAPtT�S P12E�ENTATION was m�dQ by Glen ri�TcCurdy of A1pha P�opertia�� 685a S� 105th, Be�:yerton, �ie agr�e+c� to the �taf£ findin�s a�nd recnmmez�da�ions anel ogf'sred �o an�xer qu�gtions. ITpon laeing aslsed, he �.ffirmod :Lt �ras t:he intent�on of Alpha Progserti�s �o reta3n t.he project as rental proper�ies. T'U�C TEST�X �ra� pr�sentod by: �+�+� ,.�'�teve $p�eg8ls 1Q5th a�d Koxth 17akota, wha favoreti the praposal. �'�� Betty Cookson, 1.��20 S6Y No Aakot�, �tao expressed aonc�rra that tt�e flaod waters caver more of the area than is contemplated in this plan. G1�U,�SS�»:IXA�4TN��TI�O,N_ AriD ��UT�AL: 4Yit,h respect to Mrs. Cook�oxs�s objection, tha commi�sion feZt that it had no choice hut to abide by the Corps of Engineara da�a �.th respect to flaod �l.evations« (Note; Commi�sioner Herro�t �ras excused from the moatin� at this �int,1 t�OMNi� 11�YT�ON DISG�USSZ�ON ,!#ND ACTION: Popp expressed canCES�°n Yor the adequacy of kia„rki,ng epaces w3.thin the pro�ect, feeling t.ha� 18 stree� parking space� �rould be inadequa�e to ,�erve the residents. Conaider�able d3.scussa.on followed in �rhich it wae hrou�h� up t.hat all the p�rking desig�atad was outs�.de the 100 year floodp�ain� The opinion was expreesad tha� there would be little harm ir� alloxing a portiors of some �arkis►� s�aces to �'a�.l within the floodplain� because of �he topo�raphy o� t.he sit� and the substantial portion to k�e dec�icated �or greenway. Popp asked the standards applicable to vA.riainces. Iioward read the applicable �ection of �he Code� and Popp agreed tho situation �vould indeed qu�li.�y for the vAriance aslceci for. TRere vras discuss�on of wher� four more additional parking s�aces might be located, aaad q,u.eetionin� of' ��he �lterna�ives presen�ed in Condition q. Howard presented tho thinkin� behind t�e alternatives offex�ed and the possiw b3,1i��.es pox°aaived for t.his loca�ion by the public Work� Direc�or, incl.uding �he pvs�sibiZity �£ �Lmgrov�.ng the flow of Faruao Creek at th3a ga�.nt. Pnp� MOV�D ap�roval of ZG�A 8•80� Conditional IIse CII 8�8A, and �, . _ _ , .. . _ MZNi7 TF.S TTG4RD PLAT1NINa COMMISSTOST May 20, 19$0 Page 6 Variance V 5p8Q, based on staff findings and recommendations, with the add:Lti,�n of Condition � �o ths R�comme�rtd�tians; �+That four addit3.onal �.a.rk3.n� space� sha7.1 be provided, in the developmc�nt �t s3.te design rev3.e�r.� The mo�ion yvar� secondecl by Ko].leas and �assQd unanimously. 5.5 ZONE CH.ANG� PLANNED DEV:EI,OPMEN� DISTRICT, �,CPD �9��g (Wint�er Laka) NP� � A request by I�ssell. Kru�er for a �eneral P1an 1Zeview �or T'hase II of �finter Lake located betwesn SW lj5th and SW 130th� npr�h nf Mnrning Hill and �alcon Riso Drive (Wash. I Go. Tax Nlap iSl 33D, Tax I,ot 300 an'd Tax Map 1S1 33DC, Tax Lots 100s 30Q, y.00, and ,500). Howard read the �TAFF REPC)RT and &FCOMMk�TDATI0I�S. .,........m The APPLTCANT'S PR�SEN�'A�'TON was m�de by Ron 0":Brian of BaYicroft, pst�rsrsn & Associa�es, Tno., 140 N•E. 3rd Avenue, I3il�sboso. The applicant a�reed in genoral rr�.th the staff report and recommendatians• Mre O�F3r�.an sug�ested it �rould be more appxopriate a� Conci3.tion 8 tp r�qni�Q the metss an� bourzdE desoript:ion of the dor�ated park areA to be ��p�oeided at the time of subm3.ssio� of �he f3.na7. p].atfo rather t.han ths preliminary pl.at, as writteno Staff agreed to thie. O�Bria� dis�- cus�sd the conditiqns ��.ving riz�e to Condition 1.0, azid Howard explained d�velupuent that will tak�a place in the foreseQab7.e fu�ure in �hie �rhole genesal area• O�Brittn asked with r�speot tro Condition 11 �ha� �tae requirement for collecter strQet �av�ment width be roducsd to �.0 �rom tp.y. fr�e�, oz° left to determ:Lnation a� the Public tiYorks Director. �pQ�tkex qizestioned O��r�.an particularly with hi,� a�reemeat t�a Condition 3, tYhich oZimiaated c�rtain objects in mar�Ce�ing tactics described 3.n the applicant�s vrrit�en maicerial, He �+ae agreaable to this conditian. Fie described �he architectural review commit�ee contemplated �nd its function. PU�LIC TF;S��rras �iven by �teva Wilson, .Z1610 uW 135fi.h Anenue, rwho a�k�d as an adjoining property owner to have same �.nput in�o the � arch�,tectural glanning of ad�ois�ing buildin�e, aind th�t some considera•• tion be given for privACy �cr�ening; and he questioned �t'hi�t provisi�n �� e�wer and water for .his propor�� could 'be made, �ow�d s'�a�ed site dar�ign review was the place to consider the f3rst tv�o oi his concerns, FIe su�gebted Mr. Wi].son and the ormer of Tax Lot l�t�Q �hould b�e talk�.ng with �he developers immediately about water �nd sewer connect�,�t�s, sinee� � bo�h v�ould be clase to their property liner Ha�vard agxe�d to helg h1m work �ith �he applican� on thia. Speaker a�sked �rha� �aac I,ot 30U was. I q�Brian exp].axnad it•wras part af a �1ag lot incl�uded 3n theiar develo�ent. ; . ; :� 1 � � �.... . :. . . . . . . . ...,. . . - -- ---- � `.j �, MINUTES �TG��?D pLANNING CO1�INlI5SI0N May 20, 1�80 Page 7 COMMISS�ON DISCt7S5�ON .�1ND .�CTTOl�o .Aft�r br3.e� d:lscuc��ion in which .�...v.�..�...._ ...� ,..�,._ .�....,.» �t was pointeci ou� there wouTd be,mo�e issuss to b� considerad rrhen the a�artment port3on o� �.his development ie con�idered, �mith MOVED far approval of�,;one C`hange ,?,�; 29-79a (apartments) and ZC Z�-�qli (R-5) : together e�.th Genera�. Plan Revriew for Pha�e I--89 si.ngl,e family unite on 5,000 square faot lots, ba�ed an staff f�nd3.ng� a�d recommondati�ns, w3,th Cond�.�tian 8 to call fo� l.egal ciescription of donated parcels for park purpo�es at the time o� su�mission ot' the fi.nal plat (instead of prel�.ffiinary plat) , ar�d Condition I1 �od3.fied to h�ve the second sen�tsnce read, °tAl1 cbllector streets ehall l�a sixty (6U') foot dedicAted rights of way.rarS.th paved surfaces to l�e determine�. 'by the Fublic Works llirecto�, and s3.devralks on both sides of ths strest.�' Kolleas secan,ded the mot�.on, �rhiah cas�ried unanimously. . At thie point �he gresir�ent asked staff the status of I�em �.'7, w►hich is for a dev�l.opmer��t Xn sen�3.tive lands. Howard read a letter �ram the appli�arat ac��.ng withdrawal in the face of an adv�rsa staPf report. Zt appears th� issue w3.11 be hear.d at the July meet3.ng. 5«b 7AN�; C?�G� PLANNED I�EV�ZUPMENT DI�TRICT, ZCPD 1-80 (Copper Creek) I�PO �6 A r6q.uest by 3'ual.atin Aeve�.apmer�t Gompany for a Pz°elim3.nary P1an Revi.e�w fbx Stage I of Copper Creek for a sin�le faax3.ly planaaed unit deve�,Upmezit l.ocated sauth of St�l Durham �daad b�tareQn s�t 98th and 5W Alderbrook Drive {Ufash. Co. 2$I 1►��, Tax Lat 100a. Hawaxd read t�he S'�.�FF R'�'Cy,�,�,RT and RECOMMEfiDATI0NIS. Ri.chard Waker o�' Wakex Ar�sociates, Inc. , 1Z080 SW kll.lan Blvd., Seaverton, made the APPLTCANT"S PR�:SEPITATION. He agreed in generrzl w�..th the st�ff re�ort and recomnaend�tias�s, bnt di.scuEaed in �pma detail Condition �3;�cal.ling fbar modifica�i.on af a number of lots, parta o£ xh�.ch were pl�nned aithin sensit�ive lande. He asked tY�is conditi.an be deleted• , '.Chere Was no PU�bIC TEST�T�MONY offered. CpMM,� T�,,, SSTON DIuCUSSION AND ACTION: Smith urged insert�.c,n of a 'I provision calling �or np oxcavatioa in eensitive ].ands. In discussion of the senaitive lands issue, Howard suggested (1) t.he 1�tt� wi,thin the sensit3ve land� ccrulrz �i�= redesigned to exclude the steeply-,�lopin� por�ion� and still z��.a the �inimum 5,000 square foo�t �3ze on tz�uly buildable �,and; and (2) there COU1c�' with the loss of perhaps onl.y ane 1ot� be a straet .formed in the area of Lo�� 20a 21. 6:3 �nd 62 to connect �he �outhe�n cul-de-•c��c v�3,tY� th� large loo,p st�aet to the soutl�, thus �� ' ' NiID'fUTES TIGI►RD PLAN�ITNG GOMMISS7CQN May 20y 19$0 �'a�e 8 a%fording mu�h beicter cixcul.a�ion ta the loop atrc�at res3.den�s. �`unk expressed opposit3.on �o the flag lottin� nf lots 1 tte:t'ou�h LF e anri Speaker aalsed how far from Durham Rbad the 'Lo-ne It-•5 �xtendecl. Mr. ! Vlaker felt �he avera�e lo� $1�e, in vier of the PA clesignatic►n, tn be 1 ttxe more importax►'t cons�.derati.on. �ie �hen explai�� the rationa2e ' for the lots with back yards on steep slopea as allowing ].arge housea tej.th decks, paxhaps on piling, overlooking the wooded slopes; w�zereas exclucling �he sensitive land frot� lots would r�quire amal7. houses ' unadvantageoua�2:y placed tv;i,th re�gect to the mos� desirable faature-- the naturally g�een draW pr r�aaall canyon txt the rear of the lot. 5peaker expressad concern for tho future nf Lot l., c�ntainin� 19,000 square feet. �ie felt access adequate to serve some possi.ble a a future partitioning o� �hY.s ]:at should be providQd. Zn Yusther discus- ' �ioa i�r� 1�aker acknowledged lar�er back yards which incladed �teeply- i slnping land rvould, accordin� to the formula, allow higher dens3,ty. � i Popp MOV�:A approval. of �C�D 1-�30, together with Pxe�.imia�ary F1an �evier� for St�ge Z of the Cop�ser Creek Development, based oz� staff fi�da.ng� and recor�uaendations� but w�.tb Cvndi�ion 3 to z^eac�, �'LO'G� ��r 4 a 'T. $e `�� 0, 18, lg azad 20 shall be modif3.ad for better trafS�.c cixculatian p�.ttern.+� HAlmer secox�ded the me��ian. I� some further discus�s;ion umith f�vosed r�tent3.on of the st�eply-�s1op:Lng a��ad in cammon ovrnor�hip and caro, while allowing mod�,�'ieAtion of back yard set backs if neeessary 3.n ordsx to afPord the most advantageous siting =;: of the residenc� on thc� lot�. It �ras �elt the various concern� of �he 1 aammissioners h�.d baera addr�ssed and would re�eive cor►sid�ration �n the farmul�ti.nn of the Ciener�3. Plan. Tha motion �hen carried unanimouely. i ,�.8a ZONE ORDINAAICE T�CT ANI�iDt�EN�', 7AA 2w80 (Cit�* of 7�a.��rda . Hoqrard expla3,ned the featixre,s of tt�e draft of propoeed o�°diixance gqvern�.n� A�12, A�20 and A�-4� Resideratial 7ones, �ie aal].eci attention ; to the fac� tbere are no condi.�ional uses allowed in �he�s zones. He d3.scuesed alsa the 3.mpact on the emaller �ot pattern in the W�e�t Portland Heigbts �ubdivis�.an, together with the reasons for th� ,; provisinr�s �.n 1$.24.150 (6} as p�°oposed. ' Popp suggested this Khole iasue requires additional. study� bq tha comm3.esi.aners r and therefors any acti,on ehould be dofaxrod �o the neatt meeting� to be held �une 3. Dn MOT ON duly made and seconded the matter rras deferxed ta the June 3 an�eting. � Jrr$b ZONE OR��N,ANCE AMENDd�lEN�, ZOA '�}-$0 (City of �l"1.gaZ°d)� bs3.X1$ ,' a remand of Chapter, 1$,,�6, Hi.g�;t��y Coramercial Zon,� 4C-fi). Ho�rard d3.scussed earious aepec�a of the ].ot cove�rage•••landeoaping, par��.z�g, � ;;jr: �_ ,-. �� }; - ; �.._. � MzrruxFs TIGARD PLA.NPiING COMMISSION May r0� 1980 Page 9 accer�s, possible r�quired dedicati.��a a� green�ray, etc. The f�e7.ing appeared to be that each case has to be wei��,ed on its meri�s. The problem of a r��ionala for any pescentage figure �rae discussed, and no gqqci reason t'or any pax�ticular figure coul.d be found,. Thereupon Popp MO�VED r�.ud Bonn seconded tha mo�ion to d�lete 18.3�+020 (3) fro�n Ghapter 18.36. The motion carried uaan3.mouely. After a couple caf `bri.ef an.r�ouncemarats �rom Ho�ard t.kse presidaa� declared the meoting adjourned at 11:5Q. i�' e _ _ �!. � 4; �; PUBLIC NOTICE �;; �� TIGARD PLANNING COMMTSSION ;, rilay 20, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard !' �,' „ � 5. Public Hearings �'. �� „ 5.1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVEIAPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 14-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, } CU 7-80 and SENSITIVE LANllS PERMIT, M 4-80 (Senior Citizen Center) NPO #1 r' A request by William R: Bruner for a Zone Map Amendment with a Preliminary � and General Program Review request from R-7 "Single Family Residential" i to R-7PD "Single Fami.ly Residential Planned Development District" and �- a request for a Conditianal Use to build a Senior Citizen Center on i' 3.257 acres located at the corner of O'Ntara and Edgewood Streets (Wash. �', Co. Tax Map 251 2DB, Tax Lot 600) . M'� E' ,';'. 5.2 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 11-80 (Patricia Jacobsen) NPO #1 A request by Patricia Jacobsen for a Zone Map Amendment from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R°7 "Single Family Residential" located ;�i at 9850 SW Garrett (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2SI 2CC, Tax Lot 400) . ;; � c 5.3 ZONE CHANGE, ZC 12-80 and CONDITIONAL USE CU 6-80 (Eaker and Associates) j;; NPO #1 �`'� � A re uest b Eaker and Associates for a Zone Ma Amendment ro �'` q Y p f m C-3 °General Commercial" to C-P "Commercial Professional" and a Conditional Use reques� for a professional office building on .97 acres located at � 13620 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC, 7.'ax Lot 900) . �,. r; �: 5.4 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVEL'OPMENT DTSTRICT, ZCPD 8-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, j'. CU 8-80 and VARIANCE, V 5-80 (Alpha Properties) NPO #7 �;;! � A request by Alpha Properties for a Zone Map Amendment with a Preliminary " and General Plan Program Review request from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development ' District" and a request for Conditional Use to build duplex (attached �(,� single family) units and a Variance request for a cul-de-sac located at f� 10485 SW North Dakota 5treet (Wash. Co. Tax Map 151 34DA, Tax Lot 100) . �j' �,, 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPNIENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 29-79 (Winter Lake) NPO #7 ?'I �ic. 4i,'I A request by Russell Kruger for a General Plan Review for Phase II of �� Winter Lake located between SW l•35th and SW 130th, north of Morning Hill i �;:: and Falcon Rise Drive (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lot 300 and � Tax Map 1S1 33DC, Tax L•ots 100, 300, 40a and 500) . �`� �'�I �'��', i;I � � z�'! 1�; �t� c; �{�� „ i'� _ . ,,. ...,,� ��r�, , __ _ _ _ PIJBLIC NQTICE Page � May 20, 1980 � 5,6 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEV'ELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPA 1-80 (Copper Creek) NPO �6 A request by Tualatin De�relopment Company for a Preliminary Plan Review for Stage I af Copper Creek far a single family pl,anned unit clevelopment located south of SW Durham Road between SW 98th and SW Alderbrook Drive (Wash. Co. 251 14B, Tax Lot 100) . 5.7 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 13-80 and `SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, M '3-80 :(Kittleson/Brown) NPO #5 A request by Eldon Edwards for a Preliminary Plan Review for a planned unit development in a Light Tndustrial Zone: A)� R-7 "Single Family Residential" to M-3PD "Light Industria,l Zone Planned Development Aistriot" �n Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1, Tax Lot 1400; B) M-3 "Light Industrial Zone" to M-3PD "Light Industrial Zone Planned Development District" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 700 and Tax Map 2S1 12BA, Tax Lot 100; and located at 7415 SW Bonita Road, area oE 26.57 acres, �� 5.8a ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-80 (City of Tigard) A request by the City of Tigard for a Zone Ordina.nce Text Amenclment � for Chapter 18.24 creating zoning regulation �or the A-20 (20 dwelling i units per gross acre) and A-40 (40 dwelling units per gross acre) "Multi-family Residential" Zones. 5,8b ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 4-80 (Clty Of Tigard) A request by the City of Tigard �or a Zone Ordinance Text Amendment " for Chapter ].8.36 of. the Tigard Municipal Code rela�ing to the "Highway Commercial" (C-5) Zone. For T.T. to publish 5/7/80 and 5/9/80 �':�' vm� �._.._. _ __ , , . , .;...: . .. . , . ._. ... . ... . . ... . ... . ......._., , ..... . . ...... .... . .. . _.. ,. . . .. ..�.. k. �, .. .� . � . . .�tt� t 'i 1 "P7�ANNZNG CO'NMT.SS:CON SIGN—UP S�IEET" 4ig t; T CE: ALL PERS S TO SPEA ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE �`' NO I QN D�STRTNG K �� APPROPRIATE STGN—UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACR OF THE ROOM. FERSONS ii �'d DES3RING TO SPEAK ��1TLL TAEN BE CALLE FORWARD BY THE IR TQ SPEAK ON �; IIVDICATED TTEM(S) . ��/1�� /�� M �; � � r � � �t AGENDA ITEM: � ` REFERENCE: _ DATE: �� ' NAME ADDRESS � !i � 'I >�.�� s- s��1 �, �'f ��1�9 �- �� ,�-._ �- - . _ _ ; _ _ . , . � _ ._ ___. - � (� �� y� ��.�. / GENDA ITEM: ,� • ,J EZEFERENCE: DATE: � vC'J � � . ,_.._ i`„ i-, /" Nl-1ME ADDRESS � �, E: ,,,`�fy R P�l Q �- _ S D '�`-� t��. u ILL.S jZ.� �� '�� '��.��-- s'/�✓` ��"`�� i''• , � �; _ $,; ��, ��,�—,�.�G�/ �. �� . i:�'i � �;ti (`'f e:�. . _ . . �`,?�. • ��G k!� t� AGENDA ITEM: � E NC� DATE: � l' � r:�l � i V'� NAME ,ADDRE;S S � � ,� `� V� ---��(� �' _,�w • c � ��: t�; t��'d ��.0 � �/. �� ^ �, �, �� .� 1 � �: L�ic.�- �-��,�.. �_, . _ �,;. . {;�t - :�� ;; ,� k�� . F'� ��; t • ;4, v. A� i .. .. 1 . . . . . . ,. . � ; 1 ' �1 . � 'i "PI,AI�7NING COMMISSION SIGN—UP SHEET° '� NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESTRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEfiR NF1ME ON TIdE APPROPRIATE SIGN—UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE J3ACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS DESIE2ING TO SPEP,If WILL THEN BE; CALL�D FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEI�.IC ON INDICATED I�'EM(S) . � � rG—..__ AGENT)A I TEM: ,/r ��NCC��E'.�J�� DATE: N� ADDRESS . . � • ; I _ _ I I �. �"� -��,� �----�' . ArENDA ITEM: REFERENCE: DATE: N�M� ADDRESS i � � � ~. '" Z( /� �, ,� / � / �r�,j� ( Q Y` cJ l/J G1�.Sr� � ��'../'�,`5~-�1C1,�o u.r.-'7`r� % L� ��. �f:' �f� �r--G� _ AGENDA ITEM: ,�. �� REFERENCE: DATE: N� ADDRESS � ,, �.r `�^ t, � �,/ �j �'r%'.a.�,'4 r lG�� u�� Q�.jLlf .�i"%9"'�Jiaii Gi i' f� �, i ...- . , �'�''t%`�i s�-,v� .-!�',1��, �j,,��/�. r ��, � i': . , , . . . . � , , . 1� � � . r, "PLANNING CONiNIISSION SIGDI-UP SHEET" •�. i NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRTATE 5IGN-UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE B�CK OF THE I200M. PERSON�a DESIRING TO SP�� WILL THEN BE GAI,LED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SP�AK ON INDICATED ITEM(S) a � ��',� � ��=�i��. � .� ,��_... AGENDA ITEM: ,� • � REFERENCE: DATE: �� I�IAME ADDRESS — �_ � �...... � t AGENDA ITEM: _ � � RE CE: _ IaATE: 5�t� a NAME � ADDRESS � — --- —.---- - -- q; — — �, ;s r � �, E � G�G'�/ C:-/r/�/��""'L— " 7 .�GENDA TEM: � FERENCE: DATE: �Q�,> NAME ADDRESS � ' � 3.�'s7_s,.,... ht�c.c� sce�, ,��,�e��,� ✓ _ �'--�� ,��c�`i`�'e ��,7 /� �`t� ,��,o�.,��r�� 's t r�<� ` ,�`'`� .,/�,��-� �.,�2�:�r, ��'.z�,�' � ^ �, — ...�� _, . . .. . . - , . .. .., . . _ ,. _ �° � ;, ' ,i. a�y STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5,1 s TIGARD PLANNING COMMIS5ION May 20, 1980 Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut 5treet, Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRTCT, ZCPD 14-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 7-80 and SENSITIVE LANDS FERMIT, M 4-80 (Senior Citizen Center) APPLICANT: William R. Bruner Jr. OWNER: CITY OF TIGARD 519 SW Third Avenue 12420 SW Main Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATION DATE: May 2, 1980 REQUEST: Zone Map Amendment with a Preliminary and General Program Review request from R-7 "Single Family Residential" and M-4 "Tndustrial Park Zone" to It-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Devel.opment"; and A Conditional Use request for a community building in a R-7 zone; �a ' A Sensitive Lands Permit request. ;. SITE LOCATTON: Corner of O'Mara and Edgewoad Streets (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DB, Tax Lot 6U0) . PREVIOUS ACTION: Land purchased by City of Tigard with Washington County Block Grant Funds. �e Senior Center Committee and the firm of John Ky1e Architect has been primarily responsible £or the development of plans to date. I, FINDIY�IGS OF FACT: 1. The majority of the p rojeot is presently zoned R-7. A small portion of the property to the north within the onehundred year floodplain just across Fanno Creek is zoned M-4. 2. Chapter 18.20 of the Code, Section .020 allows Community Buildings (Public) as a Con ditional Use in a R-7 zone. I 3. Section 18.60.120 (3) (a) of the Code requires one (1) parking space for I each sixty (60) square foot of gross floar area for public buildings. Site plan specifies 7200 gross square feet which equates to 120 parking spaces. Subsection (3) (b) under clubs, specifies one (1) parking space per 100 square foot gross floor area which equates to 72 parking spaces. The actual site plan shows 43 with the "potential future parking" showing '�' _ ,y ,� I ` i:�� .� . ' e: , _ ' � : i' . R �. i STAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5.1/ZCPD 14-80,CU 7-80, M 4-80 � � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 � Page 2 i" 16 spa.ces for a total of 59 spaces. This requirement could be "�.djusted" due to the expected use of the building for a senior center, use of mass ' transit facilities and the fact that this building is not "total'ly public" for assemblies, nor is it a "lodge or club" in the strict sense of the word. ; �; The possibility to enlarge the parking area in the future could meet the Code requirements. 4. The Fire Marshal.l has revi�wed the general site plan and sugyests that the "Deadend" driveway to the west service entrance be chariged to allow a turnaround for all vehi�les. A fire hydrant sball be installed within 250' of any part of the building or the building shall be sprinkled. 5. The Sensitive Lands Ordinance requires that land within floodplain be designated Planned Unit Development and be brought before the Planning Commission for review. In this case no part of the structure or parking lut encroaches into the floodplain. The Sensitive Lands Permit is included/requested only to satisfy the requirements of the Code. A sewer line installation will go north and will go into the floodplain. The Public Works Director will supervise this work. ; , 6. A sidewalk installation along the north side of O'Mara to Iiall Boulevard is anticipated to be funded through H.U.D, next year. � � II. CONCLUSTONARY FINDINGS: l. The use of this property is in conformance with the Comp.rehensiv� Plan designation and fi.he Code. � .i 2. This development can be served with water and sewer service. Public transportation is availa.ble within a reasonable distance. 3. All general/specific guidelines established by H.U.D. through the Washington County Block Grant Program have been complied with or wi11 be before ;_:; comp le t ion. �` III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: t- Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: `� 1. Project shall be subject to Site Design Review. �;; i ' 2. Na Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions plaaed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections ; verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. i:' ; ,.; 3. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless forma.l ;',`; application is made to the appropriate City department an d changes are "�' � approved by that department. Appl.ication for changes will be made in �;^,', writing and shall include applicable drawings. ' � �; , t �`:", �; i,', �<. r';` t:' 1'� : , .., _ .. : a;�. ,...,...... , . ..,. . ... ...._.. . _.. ,..._... _. .. .... ... _ _ . ... ... _. ,. _ .., ... . ♦ e + � . b� � STAFF REPORT �� AGENDA 5.1/ZCPD 3�:4-$0, CCT 7-80, M 4-$0 "' TIGARD PLANN2NG COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 3 4. Grading plans and construction plans on all public right-of--ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 5. Public water service and sanitary �ervice shall be instal.led to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 6. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 7.: No Building Permit shall be issued until the ex�,iration, of the twenty (20) day appeal period from the date of approval. 8. Impr�vements may be bonded prior to issuanc� of Building Permits. 9. That street improv+ements be constructed to the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a Building Permit. , 10. Th� concerns of the Fire Marshall shall be satisfied a�t the Site Design I�view level. ��, � I' ` ard, Planning Dirsctar 1 i l � � F �..w�:�..�'� � �. .. .. ... . .. . . . � . ... . . . � , . . .. , . . ... ,.. .i.....� „_:,;:. �..i -�.�--� , _ , .-� 5TAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior Higlz - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 11-80 (Patrica Jacobsen) APPLICA�IT: Ms. Patricia G. Jacobsen OWNER: SAMF 9850 SW Garrett Tigard, Ok 97223 APPLICATION DATE: April. 30, 1980 REQUEST: For a Zone Map Amenclment frc�m Washi.ngton County RU°4 to City af Tiga•rd R-7 "Single Family Residential"s • SITE LOCATION: 9850 SW Garrett (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lot 400) . i PREVIOUS ACTION: � ! f Property annexed to the City; Resolution 78-42 on June 12, 1978; Boundary � � ' Commission #1280 on July 26, 1978 and Ordinance 78-61 passed on September 25, 1978. I. FTNDINGS OF F'AC:T: 1. Requested R-7 zone designation is in conformance with Tigard adopted Comprehensive Plan. �� II. CONCLUSIOAJARY FINDINGS: ,� Y$ 1. Necessary right-of-way dedications on Ash Avenue and Garrett Street �': have been made to allow half-street improvements. Applicant has worked �+ with Public Works Director in this regard. �;'j �' 2. A minor land partition application has been filed with the City ta �� cr�ate two lots (11,800 square feet and 10,400 square feet) . This is in ?l 4" process now. �.; �` III. STAFF I2ECOMMENDATION: �!� Y. �,� Staff recommends approval. E'�' �.� !'� ,:a >:} �; �;'; �: ��i ��: � � ._- p�' ie ard, Planning Direator �� r� �, ,,., �;'. �: � . .. .. .. . ..•.. „ ... . ,�... . . . ,. .., . , .. ... �.. .., .. ..._ ....:. ,r�.�;.,.,,� �� . �; �,� STAFF REPORT .-a AGENDA 5.3 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 19$0 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Leoture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard ' I DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE, ZC Z2-80 and CONDITIONAL USE 6-80 (Eaker & Associates) APPZICANT: SAERMAN LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. OWNER: SAME 21785 SW Tualatin Valley Highway Aloha, Oregon 97005 APPLICANT , • DATE: April 25, 1980 REQUE5T: F�r a Zone Map Amendment fram C-3 "General Commercial" to C-P "Commercial Professional" as designated on Tigard's adopted Comprehensive Plan and a Conditional Use request for a professional ,. office building on .97 acres. LOCATION: 13620 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 2CC, Tax Lot 900) . � PREVIOUS ACTION: None. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: � �_ l. Prior to new construction on this �arcel, the zoning designation must be brought into conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan Zone Designation of C-P "Commercial Professional". Section 18.40.011 Coznmercial Professional Concl�.tional Uses allows professional office buildin gs. 2. Public services are presently installed on site. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDING5: 1. Property to the north will redevelop in the fu�ure (Heintz Automotive) and, therefore, the site plan shows a future access to the north: on the proposed plan. The intent is to provide overall ��affic circulation through the Heintz Property through the Bishop property to a future traffic signal on 99W at the Stan Wiley Site. A light is being installed at Park Street to serve a portion of the vacant property to the north of this site. 2. Paaific Highway right-of-way needs improvement with the addition �of sidewalks and landscaping. All work along this right-of-way shall meet the specifications of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the City of Tigard. � III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Zone Change and Conditional Use with the following conditions: ., _ , .� �'�•J � .�; STAFF RERORT '��' AGENDA 5.3/ZC 12-80/CIJ 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION M�y 20, T980 Page 2 I i 1. A demolition permit be obtained fram the Buildin g Department priar to any work on this site. 2. All �caork in the 99W/Pacifio Highway right-of-way be approved by Mr. Bill Geibel of ODOT prior to the issuance of Building Permits. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Tigard Public Works Director in conjunction with ODOT. 1 3. A11 development on this site shall be subject to Site Design Review. � 1 � s � � � � �_:>' w , Planning Dix+ector � � � r t i , ,' �- _ . _ . _ , _ #,.: . ;,i Ei �''I STAFF REPORT I`� AGENDA 5.4 ! ; TTGP,RD PLANNING COMMISSION i; May 20, 1980 - 7e30 p.m. I;`I. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room ;;; k.. 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard �'; fl 't': C'; �. DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 8-80 and � CONDITIONAL USE, CU 8-80 and VARIANCE, V 5-80 (Alpha Properties) (;', APPLICANT: Alph� Properties OWN'ER: 51�ME 6 85 0 SW 105 th ' ' Beaverton, Oregon 97005 ;° APP LI(;ATION � DATE: March 28, 1980 REQUEST: For a Zone Map Amendment with a Prelimi.na�y and General P1an Program .Review request fr�om Washington County RU-4 to City �of Tiga�d R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Developrnent District" and a request for a Conditional Use to build duplex (attached single fami.ly) units and a Variance request for a cul-de-sac. � LOCATION: 10485 SW North Dakota Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DA, ! ' Tax I,at 100) . �;I� rti � SITE � DESIGNATION: Presently Washington County Zoning RU-4; Tigard Comprehensive � Plan R-7 and Greenway. �; .i (,II I. FINDTNGS OF FACT: ' 4:� ,',';, 1. Applicant proposes to construct eleven (11) duplex unit� on a 2.28 acre ;.-` buil.dable portion of a 6.38 acre parcel, the remaining 4.03 acres to be �'`' dedicated to the City of Tigard for Greenway and .07 acre right-of-way on �`' North Dakota Street. �� d 2. According to the applicant, 2.15 acres of buildable land are availabl,e N:k above the 100 year floadplain of Fanno Creek. The Corps of Engineers G� Maps, however, show the 100 year floodplain line to be 160 feet arotuid the ;'," north cul-de-sac and from the north cul-de-sac south to North Dakota �` Street to be 159 fee t U�1n�g the correct floodplain line and eliminating j�-; the required sixty (60' ) feet right-of-way for North Dakota Street from ;; the subject site, Staff finds the buildable portion of the szte (by �,,• plainmetric measurements) to be 99,300 feet or 2.28 acres. T": !;! �,� �. � � �, , �,'� , � �'.'_: __ �. STAF'F REPORT AGENDA 5.4/ZCPD 8-80, CU 8-•80, V 5-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION I�y 20, 1980 Pa ge 2 3. According to the Density formizla in Chapter 18.56, Planned Development Cod� Staff finds that nine (9) duplexes (18 units) would be allowed in a Planned Development on this site using only the 2.28 acre non-floodplain portion. Since the applicant proposes to construct twenty-two (22) units on the site, the applicant would have to retain at least 114,583 square feet or 2.63 acres of the site in private ownership. This can be done by , incorporating at ].east .35 acres of the 100 year floodplain in the buildable portion oE this site, decreasin;�g'the dedicated Greenway area. 4. The following City Policies are applicable: NPO #7 Plan - Urban Low Density Residentia� Development: P�licy 4. Planned unit development will be encouraged on tracts large enough to accomodate ten (10) or more dwellings. Planned unit devel�pment will permit a degree of flexibility in design � that will enable a higher quality of development in accardance � with zoning standards. � � �_. Policy 7. Wii:hin the urban low density residential area, allow ' � uplexes on lots less appropriate for singTe family homes to include ' locations at street intersections, adjacent major thoroughfares, and as buffers between multifami.ly and sir�gle family areas. �� , Policy 8. When developments are propased in the urban low density �� area for sites which include id�ntifiec� natural features worthy of �`� . preservation, the p3.anned develo�ment concept shall be utilized t if the Planning Commission determines it the best method for `� �i preservation, �,y Tigard Housing Plan; ''` Policy 2, The community shall promote and enoourage a diversity ft;�� of housing densities and residential types that are available at 'n`'� various prices and rents to households of all incomes, age, sex, �'� race and livin �:'j , g patterns. Such housing should include, but not �.�. be limited to, single family residences, duplexes, apartments, ; w? mobile homes, c�ndomini�oms, and townhouses. �� r��;��. Environmental Design and Open Space Plan: '�''I �:.:, Polic 7. Retain the 100 �` Y year floodplain of Fanno Creek, its ; tributaries and the Tualatin River as an open preserve (Greenway) . �, The Greenway sha11 be established as the backbone of the open space � nPtwork and when a direct public benefit can be derived, i.e. , �' adjacent residential c3evelnpment, the Greenway should be developed � � � i for passive recreata.on and pedestrian/bike travel. ; ' f,; ��,� �',: �, �' �::. . r,``, � �i . ��i'';: __._,.u.... _ F�-.�. STAFF REPORT �, AGEND31 5.4/ZCPD 8-80, CU 8-80, V 5-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 3 Policy 21. When land is developed and includes a designated pedestrian/ biaycle path route, easements sha11 be granted to the City. In cases where developmsnt inereases the need for the path, cons�.ruction should also be required. When development OCCUY'S that is not on a designated bikepath route, but increases the need for a path, a ; contribution to a special bikepath construction fund should. be sought. ! 1 Policy 22. In areas where a path is routed thraugh or. adjacent ta a residential area, the path and/or the buildings in the area shoulci be situated in a manner to provide natural surveillance of the path. The number of. entry points to the path should also be limited in these areas. 5. The 1974, Tigard Area Gomprehensive Pedestrian/�icyele Plan designated a bike path route an the west side of Fanna Creek between North Dakota Street an d Scholls Ferry Road, tYirough the subject site. Portions of ':i this bikeway have alreaciy been constructed in Englewood and Black Bu'l1 Subdivisions, north from the former Metzger Sewer Plant site, which borders on, the northwest corxier of the subject site. ,� � 6. Surrounding uses include a vacant marshland and landfill, the Southern �� Pacific Railway, and industrial uses to the east, pastureland to the south, ��' a proposed single fama.ly attached subdivitiion (Ventura Court) of eight „� (8) lots immediately to the west, a single family detached subdivision i;; further to the west at North Dakota and 106th, and the vacant Metzger Sewer Plant to the northwest. The site is presently vacant field and marshland, with an abandoned farmhouse on the south portion. �<; 7. Washington C:ounty has approved the preliminary plat of an eight (8) lot single family attached subdivision, Ventura Couri., immediately to the west of this site. Ventura Court Subdivision wi11 occupy portions of the floodplain for building sites, using the remainder of their floodplain area for "storm drain purposes", and will be served by a 165' private stub street with na cul-de-sac. On April 1, 1980, the Planning Department objected to Washington County regarding the lotting pattern, streei: >` ! access, and floodplain use at Ventura Court; the Washington County Planning Director responded on April 21, that the County cannot "re-e�camine the substantive planning issues" involved with Ventura Court, since `'" approval of a final plat is pending. t;:: �' 8. The U.S.A. Fanno Creek interceptor line traverses the east side of the `' site. The Tigard Water District has a 12" water maix� on the south side ;`'' of Nort,h Dakota Street adjacent to the site. "' , - �� ,' 3, i:'.f,i'.. ii;` r�j�l�i.�. E%'' � 'I �...:.....:.... .. .. . .:�. - ....__.,_ ,_,,._, .. .. . ._. . . � . .. . .. . . . � STAFF REPDRT AGENDA 5.4JZCPD 8-80, C[J 8-80, � 5�80 '�IGARD PL,ANNING COMMISSION ' �',. May 20, 1y80 �. Page 4 9. The cZosest Tri-Met bus service is available oz1 Gxe�nhurg Road at the corner of North Dakota, appzoximately. 1000 Peet east of the site. 10. North Dakata 5treet is classified as a collector street in the Tigard Community Ser.vices and Transportation P1.an requi.ri.ng a sixty (60°) • foot right-o�-way with fourty-four (4�') feet pavement. North Dakota presently has inadequate right-nf-way and pavement by the subject s3te frantage. Average daily tra£fic in this section was 2,Q40 vehicl,PS/c�ay in August 1979. 11. 2"tie applicant p roposes to dedicate the 100 year floodplain portion of . this site to t2�e City of Tigard �or Greenway-Park puzposes. ?�.ftez consulta- tion with Sta�'f, the applicant has agreed to constx-uct a bikewag to Ci.ty ' staixdards trom Nor�h Dak��ta S�xeet tr� � poa:cit� on tt�e n.orth/south_ li.ne , da�iding the vite from �ae Metizgex Sew�r ��,�:tl�. site� abaut llla feet south of Fanno Creek. Applicant also proposes to landscape por�ions of the Greenway and prov�ide b.ilceway access to the Greenway �.ram the north cul-de-�ac and from the eastern housing cluster. � I2. Internal circulatian within the development will be prc�vided by a twenty-Pour (24') faot wide private street with two (2) cuJ.s-de-sac on tPae west and north housing clusters. - Eighteen (18) oft-street parkinq spaces are provided on the st.reet. � Unde,z Section 18.60 oE the Tigard ' Municipal Cc�de, twenty-two (22) spaces woulfl be required along th.e street. Pedes trian circulation is proposed via the system of gravel trails which � connect portions of the site with the Bikeway/G�reenway and the sidewalk � ot� Nor�h Da}cota Street, The applicant proposes to serve thE site with a �; pzivate s�reet due to the difficult geometry of the bui.ldalale portinn, and in oxder to mi.nimize the amount of paving in a site plan that is ,; responsive to the natural teatures. , �; �� 13. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use (C.'U 8-80) appz�val Eor the canstruction of duplexes in an R-7 zone, under Seatian 18.�0.020 ;' and 18.72 of the Tigard Municipal Code. If this enti.re site wexe bui.ldable �� under R-7 standards for single family use (�our (4) units/acre) , twenty-five s� (2�) units could be constructed here. Applicant p xoposes to construc�t ;:; only twenty-two (22) uni�s, while allowing the majar portion of the site �' to be used for public Greenway and open space. These units would be ;;;'I rented fax app n�ximately $375 to $400, which woul.d provida a middle incom� housing alternative for people who cannot now af�ord to purcfiase 4;�: a single famil.y home due to high dbwn paymen�. and interast rates. • ` i' 1�1. The applicant is requesting a Variance (V 5-80) from Section 17.OS.I10 - F _ (Cu1-de-sac) Streets, of the Tigard Municip�l Code wh�.ch limits cu1-de-sac ^;� �� length to no more. than 400 £ee�. The appl.icant pr�pases ta extend the �' north cul-de-sac a roxim.atel 500 �ee� at its futhest; �' PP Y pain�. Bottt ;; cul��ie-sac turnarounds will have a 42 foot paved radius, as required by f;.,, th,e Gode. The applican t claims that the odd shape of the buildable praztion , ,Y: af the site makes it dif£icu].t to develop a rational site p1an, an+d that ;;; the cul-de-sac must be placed a� the widest point of the north builc�fable �5 "fi.nger", in order �.o get an adequate turning radius be�ween buildi.ngs, , � • �,� � ,�,., STAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5.4/ZCPD 8-80, CU 8-80, V 5-80 TIGARD PLANNING CONiMISSIOIV May 20, 1980 Page 5 15. The applicant's site plan has c�enerally avoided us� of the floodplain, however, the off-street parking area east of the north cul-de-sac intrudes into the floodplain area. 16. Applicant expects to begin construction in June 19$0 and complete the project by March 1981. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The proposed Conditional Use (CU 8--80) of the site for duplex residential is appropriate, given that duplex use serves as a buffer between industrial and single family uses on North Dakota Street. The site plan is responsive to natural features ,and sensif:ive lands, and the applicant will dedicate nearly sixty (60�) percent of the total site to , public use and make improvements thereon. This use is in conformance with NPO #7 Plan and the Environmental Design and Open Space Pl.an. 2. There is a public need for affordable housing for moderate income persons, which is not being met in the present single family housing market, Duplex housing on thi� site wi11 provicle an affordable and �,., desirable housing alternative for znoderate income persons which supports the Tigard Housing Plan an�d State Planning Goal #10, Housing. 3. The appliaant should retain those portions of the site in private owner- ship which include the private walkways in the floodplain so that the "buildable portion" includes at least 2.63 acres as required for twenty-two (22) units. 4, The proposed Bikeway and Greenway will provide an important link in connecting Tigard's Greenway and Bikeway system between North Dakota Street and Scholls Ferry Road. The applicant should construct the bikeway to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department after approval of Site Design Review far the en�ire site by the Planning Di re ctor. 5. Although a unified loop street would be desirable to connect this site with Ventura Court, the City has not been able to secure the copperation of the Ventura Court developer in either annexation or a common street plan. Since a street connection to the west seems unlikely at this time, the street plan for this development is constrained to streets wholly within the site. 6. Adequate sewer and water servioe are availabl.e to the site, with permi.ssion of the Unified Sewerage Agency and the Tigard Water District. No � provision for storm drainage was in di.cated in the site plan. 3 4 � E F i STAFF REPORT , AGENDA 5.4/ZCPD 8-80, CU 8-80, V 5-80 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 6 i s, i 7. North Dakota Street presently has inadequate pavement and right-of-way; ` applicant should dedicate an extra ten (10�)feet of right-of-way along North Dakota Street and make half-street improvements along the entire site frontage as far as the Fanno Creek Bridge to collector street standards. �; i 8. The internal circulation proposed for this development is adequate for ;I pedestrian and vehicle traffic. The private street is justified due to the difficult shape of the buildable portion. At least twenty-two `� (22) off-street parking spaces (in excess of the single car garages) ��i i• must be provided alang the street. Given the low-lying nature of the �! site, private walkways within the project should be paved, not gravel� 5' to provide maximum all-weather service to pedestrians. ` 9. The Variance (V 5-80) from Section 17.08.110 of the Tigard Municip�l Code (length of cul-de-sac} is justified due to the odd shape of the builda.ble portion of this site and the City's present inability to � secure cooperation from the owner of Ventura Court Subdivision and Washington �' County. The forty-two (42° ) foot radius of the turnaround meets City ;- standards. Beca�use of the excess cul-de-sac length, a fire hydrant �' should be placed within the development according to Washington County �`' �� Fire District #1 standards. � 10. Since the applicant's north parking area intruc�es into the 100 year floodplain, applicant should, do one of the following; � t�, A) Re-design the parking area to stay out of the floodplain, t',. �. B) App'ly for a Sensitive Lands Permit. !; ;: C) Study the feasibility of flood relief (1owe�:ing the floodplain level) �'; by the installation of culverts under North Dakota Street and/or the i' construction of a flood xeliet �hannel across the largest meander i' of Fanno Creek, f' ��' 11. The applicant will complete the project within one year of approval in i. a single phase. � �4Q III. STAFF RErOMMEt�]DATION: �'� i�Staff recommends approval of this Planned Development District and General ; Development Plan with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant retain those portions of the site in private ownership � which include the prxvate walkways in the floodplain, s� that the �' "buildable portion" includes at least 2,63 acres as required for twenty-two (22) units. �` �,,, � � �.._. _ _ _ _ _. , ,�.�..ti. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4/ZCPll 8-$0, CU 8-80� V 5-80 �_v� TTGIIRD PLANNING COMMISSION May 2 0, 19£30 Page 7 2. That the applicant cnnstruet the Bikeway from North Dakota Street to the north/south property line between the Metzger Site and subject site to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director after approval of Site Design Review for the entire site by the Planning Director. 3. That applicant dedicate ten (10' ) �eet'� �f right-of-way on North Dakota _ Street, and construct half street improvements to the entire North II Dakota Street frontage to collector standards, as far. as the Fanno Creek Bridge to the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the issuance of Builc�ing Permits;plus . . . . 4. . . .That applicant secure permission from the Unified Sewerage Agency and Tigard Water District for connection to their lines, prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. That applicant provide paved five (5' ) foot wide private walkways witha.n the Planned Development. 6, That applicant provide a fire hydrant within the development according to the standards of Washington County Fire District #1. `�,. 7. That applicant submi.�t a storm drainaqe, sanitary sewer, and water line plan to the Public Works Department far approvaZ prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 8. That applicant complete the }?raject within one year of approval. 9. That applicant do one of the following regarding the north parking area: A) Re-design the parking area tc stay out of the flaodplain; or B) Apply far a Sensitive Lands Permit; �r C) Study the�feasibility of flood relief via culvets or a flood relief channel in cnnsultatiqn with the Public Works Director, and if feasible and effective, construct relief improvements to the approval of the Public Works Director. 1Q. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisifed and inspections � verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. I ]_1. No changes will be znade to approvecl plans or specifications unless formal .application is made ta the app ropriate City department an d changes are appmved by that department. Application for. changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. ; �. 12. Al1 existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting ins�allations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. ,� . ... ., . . -• --,�--: , .. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ � . • ' µ � STAFF RERORT �,' AGENDA 5.4/ZCPD 8-80, CU 8-$0, V 5-80 � TIGARD PLANIJING COMMISSION � May 20, 1980 � Page 8 il I � A, 13. Improvements may be bonded pri.or to issuance of Building Permits. � ,� �± �; i; �:' � �: �: ;t �k:�� I��:��'�... �`�I t�'I . 7;i,' f�! �: �' ,� Prepared by Richard N. Ross, Approved by A7. i �� _., Intern Planner P D' ector � •�. fA'; � �,�'. �tr,;i {i,�g 1:{-. t_,1, ��' �;�, �`, . � 74�i��'. �!t, 4:�i �'? } i � �r. . �:i �:t', � ' I,�±; �jt� � i �r �;.. � S t �i. � k , � i,.. �i � �Y 1:{7 rt: . . . .. .`z..1 � ,. . . . . . ... . ._.. ... .. . . . . . . ., , _ , ' ; -. . . , _ _ _ _ . ' �" , } � J S7'AFF REPORT I AGENDA 5.5 i � TIGA,RD PI�ANNIN'G COMMISSION J `�:.;^ May 20, 1980 - 7:30-p.m. � Fowler �7unior High Lecture Room , 10865 5W Walnut Street, Tigard � � i S DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 29-79a (apartments) - ZC 29-79b (R-5) � (Winter Lake Planned Unit Development) 1 APPLICANT: RUSSELL KRUEGER OWNER: Map 151 33D, Lot 100 and " 4320 SW 110th Avenue Map 1S1 33DC, Lot 500 � � Beaverton, Oregon 97005 RUSSELL KRUEGER Same Address ;+� Map 1S1 33DC, Lot 300 and 400 GEORGE SCOTT �I 11640 SW 135th Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATIVN DATE: May 5, 1980 • � Y REQUEST. For a Zone Map Amendment (ZC 29 79b) from Washington C.ounty ii RS-1 to City of Tigard R-5 "Singl.e Family Residential" for that area designated on Exhibit 2, page 3 �f Winter Lake r Single Family R-5PD Multifamily A-12PD of July 1979 and � Zone Map Amendment (ZC 29-79a) from Washington C'ounty RS-1 � �. to City of Tigard A-12 "Multifamily Residentia�'° for that axea on the same Exhibit, same page of same document. Areas so designated will be cl�arly defined �n the recording of tha final plats. Applicant is also requesting a Gez�eral Plan Review for Phase I - 89 Single Family Units on 5,000 square ;�, foot lots (38 duplex or af.tached single famiZy dwellings) . ��, ,� �,, S I TE �:, LOCATION: Phase I and Phase II: East of 135th Avenue between Saholls �? Ferry Road and Walnut Street (Wash. Co, Tax Map 1S1. 33D, �+ Tax Lot 300 and Tax Map 1S1 33DC, Tax Lots 100, 300, 400, �� and 500) . ;� (� PP�EVIOUS ACTION: !P �°�I �, On December 5, 1978, the applicant's request for a Zone Map Amendment with �� Preliminary Plan Developm,ent Review approval was Tabled for two reasonse `i' (1) The applicant was finalizing a puchase of lancl adjacent north of the !;�' subject site that he wanted to include in the total plan. (2) The City of j.',' Tigard and the Neighborhood P1an Organization #7 were still considering the i' land use and zoning designation for this area. � P. 4' On June 19, 1979, the Planning Commission Denied the applicant's Planned �` Development and stated the following for the applicant to resolve i.n new i, �; applicatic�n: �, � � � �', �` !: S TAFF E2E PORT ��'� AGENDA 5.5/ZC 29-79a and b - TIGI�RD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 2 , 1. Calculations should be specific regarding density in relation to PD and Sensitive Lands. 2. Information on the schools in the Tigard SchQol District should be obtained. 3. Sensitive Land areas within this project should be addressed. A drainage ' way area in the eas�.ern portion of the project needs to be considered. 4. Park and Recreation�al issues should be resolved with the Park Board, On August 21, 1y79, the Planning Commission approved Zone Change, ZC 29-79a and ZC 29-79b and directed the applicant to address the following issues - EmergencX vehicle access, the drainage way issues and the f.loodplain issues. A re-examination of the floodplain was requested. On February 5, 1980, the Planning Commissa.on oonsidered the Staff Report on Special Use Permi.t, M 1-80 which addressed the floodplairr, drainage way, and �4 emergenc,y access issues raised at a previous meeting. M 1-80 was Approved with the following conditi.ons: 1. That the question of emeigency vehicl� access be resolved at the General Plan and Program Hearing. 2. 'I'hat site and public drainage construction plans be approved by the Building and Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permits or Bonds. 3. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate Cit_y depar�ment and changes are approved by that departznent. Application �for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 4. That the proposed drainage system shown on this applzcation bs added to the General P'lan. T. P"IIVAINGS OF FACT: 3ee attached Staff Report of August 21, 1979. Findings have nat changed substantially. Ap�licant has addressed all concerns of Staff and the Planning Commi.ssion � in Narrative dated May 8, 1980 and made a part of the record. ? � �I � STAFF REPORT �''� AGENDA 5.5/ZC 29-79a and b . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 3 II. CONCLUSIONARY E�'INUINGS: • Reference 5taff Report of August 21, 1979. Conclusionary Findings have not changed substantially. Applicant has addressed all concerns of Staff and the Planninc� Commission in Narra�ive dated May 8, 1980 and made a part of the record. Reference Staff Report, Docket M 1.-80 of February 5, 1980 and the subsequent aotion of the Planning Commission. III. 5TAFF RECOMMENDATION: 5taff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Phase TI - ZC 29-79a (apartments) shall be brought before the Planning Commission at a later date. � 2. Phase I - 2C 29-79b (R-5) sha11 comply with the requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 17, Land Partition Ordinance. � 3. Actual construction on each single family or duplex (attached single family) lot shall be resolved relative to configuration, zero lot line, an d setback requzrements on the Preli�minary Plat P1an. This i�lan shall be �'� cleared with the Building Department and Public Works Department prior `� ; to consideration of the Final Plat. It shall be clearly noted what is to be c�nstructed on each/every lot in Phase I to avoid differences `� at the construction stage. Also zero lot line on each/every lot would conflict with requi.rement for easements. 4. A Homeowner's Agreement, if one should be adopted, shall be reviewed by Staff and may be reviewed by the City Council. All Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CCR's) shall be submitted to the Staff for review and comment prior to recording of the Final Plat. 5. Phase I shall be subject to Site Design Review by Staff prior to the � issuance of Building Permits. 6. Necessary right-of-way dedication on 135th Avenue shall be made as directed by the Public Works Director. Half-street improvements to Collector Street Sta,ndards sha11 be made for the full length of frontage �� on 135th Avenue. Z'hese improvements shall be made including the frontage �' on Tax Lots 200, 300, and 400 on Map 1S1 33DC. A Local Improvement ?`' District may be considered for this installation initiated by the developer �:' and supervised by the City of Tigard. All construction in the public 5' right-of-way sha11 be approved by the City prior to caimnencement of work. F; �� ;, � �' f' l s C f;. � STAFi' REPORT AGENDA 5.5/ZC 29-79a and b �i TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSZON �- May 20, 1980 . Page 4 7. A Variance from the 10,000 square foot requirement for duplexes in a R-5 Zone is hereby granted by the Planning Commission. Minimum duplex lot sizes in this development may not be less �han 8,000 square feet. Refer to Gondition #3 on the preceding page for further clarification. 8. Dec3ication of 3.4 acres to the City of Tigard shall be made for City Park purpos�s. A meets and bounds legal description for this property shall be provided at the time of su�mission of the Preliminary Plat. 9, Emergency vehicle access to the apartment units will be resolved when Phase II is presented to the Planning Commissioiz. 10. Consideration shall be given to Tax Lots 400 and 401 to the east of proposed "A" Street off-site. Temporary driveways or some alternate means of service should be considered. 11. All public local streets shall be fifty (504) foot dedicated right-of- � ways with thirty-four (34') feet of paved surface? Al1 collector streets .� shall be sixty Q60',? foot dedicated ri.ght-of-ways with minimum forty-four (44' ) feet paved surface, and sidewalks on bo�h sides af the street. Actual placement of sidewalks shall be resolved through Site Design � Review with the Public Works Director. 12. No Ocrupancy Permits shall be issued until all. conditions placed upon I . . , this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections t verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. hall be made in reference to this ro'eat �; 13. No minor l�nd partitions s P J � unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Alanning Depart- � anent and the xninor land partition is approved and recorded. � u i; 14. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal � application is made to the appropriate City department an d changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in s; writing and shall inalude applicable drawings. �' 15. Grad�.ng plans and construction plans on a11 public right-of-ways shall � be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement ! s of work. � 16, Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed tu this site ,prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 17. All existing or pro�o5ed utilities shal,l be placed underground. Street lighting installations sha11 be approvea by the Public Works Director. � �. � STAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5,5/ZC 29-79a an� b `��` TIGARD PLANNING COMMISBION � �° May 20, 1980 � Page 5 , � � 18. No Buildiny Permit shall be issued until tlle expiration of the twenty � (20) day appeal peri�d from the date of approval. �; 19-. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuancE of Building Permits. � � 20. That street imprc�vements be constructed to the appro�ral of the Public ;; Works Director p"rior to the recording of the Fina1 Plat or issuance �f a ;� ,� Building Permit. r1 ,� 21. On-site drainage plans for drainage during construction sha�.l be approved i� by the Aublic Works llepartment prior. ta cammencement o.f any aeanstruction. �j �, 1 �� ' '';; %� j,; 4j rx ij ��i �{ � ' t �' f� ow , Planning U�.rector � �!,'� �� ;; � �p: �;< �; �; ,, ��' � �� :� , �` Y' f�. �. �� '' �(r t . . . . . . . .., ...., ...,, �., .�._F»_,� T,�`.,., .._ei, . . , ,., Z . ._ i ,y�.:� .. . . . ...... . . . �'i ... . . . .. ...�. .___ . ' � �. � �� STAF� REPORT AGENDA 5.2 TIGARD PLANNIN� COMMT55ION ? �;� � august zi, 19�9 - �:3o P.M. �: 10865 S.W. Walnut T�gard, oregon 97223 Docltet: Zone Change ZC 29-79a and ZC 29-79b PD(Winter Lake Planned Deve2opment , ' Re: ZC 25-78PA & ZC 24-79 PD) � � � i' Applicant: Mr. Russell A. Krueger Owner: Same ' a; 2041 SW 58th Avez►ue Portland, Oregon 97221 �' r�pplication Date: 3uly 17, 1979 . � between S holls Ferr Road and Walnut Street Site Location: East o 1�Sth c , Y ' t 0 0 0 I Co. 'Iax Ma 1S1 33D Tax Lo s 300 SO 60 6 1 602 & 603 Wash. , , , ) � > > P l ;, Request: For a preliminary p7.aa and program review for a multz-family planned ; development zone. (A-2PD) on a 12.0 acre si.te. Also, for a zone change �" from Wash. Co, RS-1 to Citp of Tigard R-5 on a 24.8 acre par.cel with a + tentative subdivision plan. � ' I . � I Previous Action: On December 5 1978, the a licant s request for a zone ma ; II � PP P , � amendment with preli.minar_y plan development review approval ' � �K was tabled for two reasons: (1) The applicant was finalizing ,�'; I a purchase of land adjacent north of the subject site �.hat he wanted to include in the total plan. (2) The City of Tigard r.;{ and the Neighborhood Plan Organization ��7 were sti11 considering �; r;; the land use and zonireg d�signation for this area. i,� t;;I On 3une 19, 2979 the P2anning Commission denied the applicant's �� '� �., planned development and stated the following as consideration ',;,, for fihe applicant to resolve in new application: ;`;'' � `,:�i c: 1. Calculations should be specific regarding densitq in '� relation to PD and sensitive lands. �`:';' �;� `:I 2. Information on the schools in the Tigard School District ;;<� should be obtained.. ` " �:;�I �,,� 3. Sensitive land areas within this project should Ue addressed. `?''°i A drainageway area in the eastern portion of the project needs �,.�;'. to be considered. �:; �:;i 4. Park and recreational issues shauld be resolved with the �;'''; Park Board. ";` �^-.: 4�� The applicant was also required to apply for separate zone chanoes �"� for the single family and apartment parcels. The multi-fami.ly ( ' P �'J^ plan is to include the proposed site layoufi. �?� ��. r";'; �;� t:� �Y ;;r ��. i'�"` ` v.. k 1. � +' 4 A � STAFF FZFPORT f�� AGENDA 5.2 � �4 TIGARD PLANNING COA9�IISSIOrI j: August 21, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. �,�_' ! 10865 SW Walnut � Tigard, Oregon 97223 �i Pa�e 2 � � ZC 29-79a and ZC 29-79b � � 1 � 4 I. Findings of Fact: � � a I. The site is designated R-5 "Single Family Residential" on the north, west � and east. On the southeast, the site id designated A�2 "Mulri-tarni�.y" ; twelve d��elling units pex gross area. The site zs presently zoned Wash.. 1 Co. RS-1. The land use is designated by the NPO ��7 Plan. � I 2. The spplicant's request is in accordance with Section 18.5b.020 and ! 17.16.01.0 of the Tigard Municipal Code. 3. The apglicant proposes to construct 95 single family dwelling units. 1,6 duplex units and 1.3$ apartmenCs. 4. SecCion 18.56.�.10 of the Tigard Municipal Code provides the density factor calculation for the Planned Development as follows: 24ulti-family acreage sitea 12.0 � Mii�us public iznprovement 20% Buildable net acres: 9.6 �,. Aivide the total net area (in square feet) by the underlying zone (in square feefi�. 418,176.00 divide 3,630 sq. ft. - 115.�0 dwelling units. Additional 20� may be permitted for the dedication of open space etc. (the pond 3.67 ac.) 115.20 x 20� = 138.24 the applicant is • .24 dwelling untis under the maximum allowed dwelli.ng units in the � A-2 zone. The Housing Implementatian P].an adapted by the City Council on May 21, 1979 permits six dwelling units per gross acre on the subdivision portion of the subject site. Therefore, 6 dwelling units x 21.4 = . 128.4 allowable dwelling units. Ttte applicant's proposed density is 17 dwelling units below the maximum. 5. Applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan for develapment in the NPQ ��7 area• Public imp�rovenients: Policies 2 and 10 - page 3 and 5. Planned Unit Developments: Policy 4 and 11 - p3ge 3 and 5. Site and Open Sp�ce Improvements: Policy 8 and 13 - page 4• LacaL-ion of High Density Rasidencess Policy 5 - page 4. Density foz multi-family: Policy 9 - page 5 � �;r,T^1.� t�� ;; STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2 TIGARD PLANNTNG COI`1�iIISSION August 21, 1979 - 7:30 PeM. 1.0865 SW 4Jalnut I T�.gard, Oregon 97223 . i ZC 29-79a and ZC 29-�9b � I Page 3 � . � � 6. A description of the site area is explained on page 4 of the applicant's attached nsrrative. ; G 7. The surrounding land uses are single family un�'�'s to the south (Morning Hill Planned Development), east {Summer Lake Planned Development and � proposeci Summer Lalce Park) to fihe no.rth and west acxoss S.W. 135th � i.s vacant land designated for residential use (see vicznity sketch on " page 7 af the applicant's narr�tive) . [; �;. 8. Sewer and water services as we11 �s other utilities are explained starting �� on page 19 of the applicant's narrative). �' li 9. South*aest 135th Avenue arzd S.W. 130th Avenue wi11 serve the trafFic needs �' in this development. Southwest 135th Avenue is presently a county road � and is designated as a collector street on the NPO ��7 Plan. Southwest �: c 135th Avenue is in substandard condition having inadequate paving width � and righr-of-way with no sidewalks or cur.bs. Southwest 130th Avenue �' r � is presently a private road. Summer Lake Planned Development is ' ' j improving it up to the northeast corner of the subjecti site. Southwest � 130th A�venue is designated as a collector stree� and will serve the property from the east moving from. north to souCh. The street needs to be realigned and dedicated with full. street improvements (see plan). �'j l`;� 10. The Park Board has requested that the applicant dedicate a 3.4 acre i� parcel (see plan) adjacent to the �ummer Lake Park area to the City. �' The applicant is considering the request. ? II. Conclusionary I�'indings: �;: I;; 1. The applicant has demon.strated through the site plan and narrative I: that he is conforrning to the concept of a planned development in the �: three parcels as required by the Tigard Municipal Code and the I;,. Comprehensive Plan. �;-� �_: 2. The appZicant is wel�. w.ithin the density permitted for single family and �� A' multi-family. ``' � 3. The plan shows a 3.4 acre parcel of land for park use �nrhich is called �'� for on the Summer Lake Park P1an. f: 4. Concerns expressed by the Planning Commission for density calculations, . C� drainageway activities and schools have been addressed (see attached school 7:etter and page 20 of the narrative for description of the h drainageway contouc) . �,; ,.,: .,, , �....._.: , ,....:.._:_ � , :.. ._ _ I � , , . ' • STAFF REPORT AGErtDA 5.2 � TIGARD PLANNTNG CON�SISSION ZC 29-79a and Z� 29-79b �;� ;', Page 4 5. The pa-rk and recreational issues have been resolved. The 3.4 acre 3 axea will be planted in grass and maintained by the City. Reczeational facilities (�uch as tennis courts and softball field) are projected to be installed within four years. III. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the prel.iminar.y plan and program for the milti-family units subject to the followin; canctitio�is: 1. That 5ection 18.56.030 (General) of the Tigard Municipal Code be complied with prior to applicant's presentation of the general plan ar�d prooram. 2. That site construction and drain�.�;e plans be reviewed and a�proved by the City Engineer and Building Departments prior to issuance of building permits with any bonds or other agreements as required. ' 3. No chan�es will be made to approved plans or specifications unless '�'"'� formal application is made to the appropriate de�artment and changes '' are approved by that department. Application fot changes will be °" anade in writiag and shall include applicat�Ie drawings, engineering specifications and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will result in the immediate posting of 3 stop work order o�i the project or any portion of the project. 4. That the ingress/egress to the A-2 areas be 30 feet wide. 5, That the northern access to the A-2 areas be moved east`aard to approximatel.y 32 feet, Staff recommends approval of the R-5 zone change and tentative (prelimina�ry) subdivision plat subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant dedicate the adequate distance (as determined by the City Engineer) of right-of-way along S.W. 135th Avenue, and construct half street improvements ta collector street standards prior to approval of final plat. 2, That the applicant provide the S.W. 130th Avenue extension as shown on the p7.an prior to approval of the final p�.at. � That Section 18.56.a30 (General) oF the Tigaxd Municipal Code be � �f�1 camplied with prior to applicant.'s presentation of ttie general plan �'� p•rogra.m. e�� _ _ _ , Y STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2 TTGARD PLANNING COM�2ISSTON �• ZC 29-79a and ZC 29-79b Page 'S 3. That site cans�ruction and drainage plans be reviewed and �pproved by the City Engineer and Building Departments prior to issuance of building permits with any bonds or other agreemen�s as required. 4. No �hanges wi11 be made to approved plans �r specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other details requested by the departnent. I3o construction shall take place in t�ese instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this candition will result in the immediate poseing of a stop wor�C order on the project or any portion of the pxoject. 5. That th� iizgress/egress to the A-2 areas be 30 feet wide. 6. That �he northern access to the A-2 areas be moved eastward to approximately 32 f�et. 7. Thaz the basketball po.l.e, backboard �nd a11 other structures in th� � :"`� ' cul-de-sac islands be prohibited. However, the pain�ed paly area is permit�ed. Prepared by: Ken 1by Reviewed by: Aldie Howard Asso te Planner Planning Director �' '� :,E , _ f j . . � � ST��'r REPORT . AGENDA 5,1 �` TIGARD Pi,ANN2NG COMMISSION I �,4 Februar� 5, 1980 - 7e 30 pm , � Fowler Junior I3igh - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut 5treet, Tigard ' ��I � DOCKET: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, M 1-80 (Winter Lake) Ref. ZC 25-78, 2C 24-79) � APPLICANT: Mr. Russell A. Krueger OWNER: .Mr. R. Krueger � � 4320 SW 110th Tax Lo�s 3D0/500/600 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Mr. G. Scott Tax Lots 601/602. 11640 SW 13Sth { Tigard, Oregon 97223 (' �. APPLICATION �' DATE: January 21, 1980 � . i' i. SITE �I LOCATION: Adjoining the east side of 135th, 400' nort�h o� Morning Hi11. Drive, �; 5,400' sauth of Scho'lls Ferry Road and adjoining the west side of i 130th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lo�s 3A0, SOQ, 600, 601, and � � 6�2) . � i, REQUE5T: For Special Use Permit to locate street and private driveways in i. �`� � the drainageway on portions of the Winter Lake Planned Developm�z�t '� and Sub3ivision. � ; PREVIOUS F,CTION: � On August 21, 1979, the Planning Gomxnission approved the request by a�plicant Eor i, a subdivisi+�n and Preliminary Planned Development v�ith con8itions, (See the l�s� � page of the applicant°s Sensitive Lands Permit Report�) � I. FINDINGS OF FACT: �i, r l. The applicant's repor� addressas the issues of floodplain, drainageway impact � and emexgency vehicle access. � 2. The study (see attached book) indicates that the drainageway � will be i,ncozporated with the submerged storm drainage � �� ' � system. The request to place streets and private drive over the dtainageway f is permitted with certain requirements as stated in Section 18.57.040 of the i Tiqard Municipal Code. � i: 3. 'I'he report cal.culates the estimated runoff peak periods from the east and west ' basins. Both areas will na� be adversely affected with the road i.mprovements. , i �� ` 11 ! ; s �, I �, ` ' � � ,, ' . � . ._ ..-...--�.- � . . ... . . . . . . �. , .. I� � � MT * � ST,�FE" REPORT AG�:NDA 5.1 TIG.ARA PLt'1NNING CO�I�tiLISSION , Eebruary 5, 1980 M 1-80 Page 2 � 4. Page 14 of the report addresses the emergency vehicle access. Howe�ler, sinee response by the Washington County Fire Depar�ment District l was not - recei.ved prior to this staff report, this issue sha11 be aaaress�a as part of the general plan r�view. 5, Page 10 (Conclusions) states the adjustm�nts to the prelimi.nary pl.an that were ma�e to accontodate the sensitive Iands areas. 6. The letter (page 5) from the Corps of Engineers is su�iiaent data to t�ispell the concern that any of th� subject site (other than ttzQ pond area) is in the floodplain. IT. CONCLUSION.z1RY FINDI�iGS: 1. S�e thp Publ�� Works D;�ector's Mara� datAc9. Jan�iaxy 24, 1.980 i:� refezence to �� the applicant°s Special Use Permit. ' ' ; 2. The request and gupportive da�a submitted by the applicant have adequ;atel,y { , �� , met the Sensitive Lands Ordinance. � III. STAFF RECONINIENDATION: Sta£f recomm�nds approval of the Special Use Perm.it subject to the �ollawing condi.tions• � , 1. That the question of emer�ency Zrehi,cle access be resol�yed at the Genexal Plan i; and P.rogram Hearing. ; . �. 2. That site and public dra,inage constzuction plans be approved by the Building � and public Works Departments prior to issuance of Suilding Perm;i.ts or Bonds. � „ , - i. 3. No chan ges wi1�. be made ta appraved plans or specifications unless �'ormal appli.cation is made to the approp riate City department and changes are approyed � by that departmen�t. Application for changes will be made in writing. and shali ;j include appiicable drawings. �, t� � 4. That �k.he praposed drainage system shown on this application be aaaea �o the ��' generaI. plan. � I': ' � � � , � Prepared by Ken�' elb� Appraved b1 ` oward _ ,, ,r, Ass �� te City Planner lann ng Director � ;a �,I, �`I ��I �� vntc ' d . �`� _ - . : . �,.� .,. m. . _ . ..... .. : . __. : . , _ .... . . ..,�_ ._... _.:..___.__ _ w..� .. .. __...�..�, .._.._ ,... _ :_ _....�;_..w..._ >.__...�r.. _. 4 :.; . .,; � r . • " r� �, �- MEMO �,M TOc � KEN SELAY Januaty 24� 1980. FROM: FRANK CUP.FLYE I : � SUBJECTs WINTERLAKE - SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT - ' � Ken: . I have reviewed tne in�ozznation submittzd by David �vans and Associates artd Ben.�CendorE,. E�'ans LTD. k"tom a�ractical point of view, I would agree with the applicant that no tloadpldin exists on the site based on in�ormatian from the Gorps. of Engineers relata.ng to Sum.�ner Cretk in that the �uznmex Creek f�.aoc7��,�in is not on the site. However, there are some I.ands immediately arcund the small lalee and just up st�eam fror� the lake which would b� inundated during a 100 year stor.a depend.ing on the design� of the control.led out fall structure. In my opinion, this is an insignificant problem which can easily be addressed during the design stage. � The hydraulics of the dra.inageways are we11 thought out, accura•tely coaqauted, �" �,, and then. apparen�ly partially enclosed wi�hin a storm drain conduit. , The lake offers an excellent opportunity to accomodate stormwater runo£f from the proposed si:ibdivisiori in accordance with our storm water detention nrdinance. �� ` ..:_.__ _,_. i r STAFF REPORT ��""° AGENDA 5.6 - TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior Higt� - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZCPD 1-80 (COPPER CREEK) APPLICANT: TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. OWNER: SAME 153UU SW 116th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATION DATE: 5/2/80 REQUEST: For a Zone Map Amendment from Washington County RS-1 to City of Tigard R-SPD "Single Family Residential Planned Development District" with a Preliminary Plan Review for Stage I of Capper Creek. This stage to encompass a twenty-three (23) lot . subdivision only. LOCATION: South of Durham Road, east of Serena Way at Picks Landing Subdivision (See Plan Map Page 14 in Text). (Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S1 14B, Tax Lot 100). �` PREVIOUS ACTION: Original application was made on January 3, 1980 for a larger area. The Planning Commission Tabled the original application ox� March 18, 1980 to a11ow Staff and the applicant to work out major difficulties. Applicant requested that Stage I , be reviewed by the Planning Commission in a lett�r dated March 27, 19$0. On April 15, 1980 the Planning Commission agreed to review Stage I - twentq-three (23) lot subdivision off Pick's Landing, Serena Way. I. FTNDINGS OF FACT: l . Area has been zoned R-5 on the Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance Number 79-44 appraved May 21 , 1979. 2. Durham Road abutting this property to the north is in substandard conditic�n. A dedication of right-of-way to allow forty-five (45') feet from the center- line of Durham will be necessary to create the ninty (90') faot rightPof-way in conjunction with other development on Durham. Applicant has agreed verbally and in the text to provide this dedication. 3. Sewer service is available to these lots through lines constructed in relation to the development �of Pick's Landing. 4. Portions af Lots 1 , 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, i$, 19, and 20 are within sensitive 1and� areas. No Sensitive Lands Permit has been appli.ed for. in this app�.ica- ��, tion for Stage I. . L _ _ . _ . _ _. . .... ...�_ �_ .�._.... .__ . _ . ,_ . I • ' I � � B � STAFF REPORT � � AGENDA 5.6/ZCPD 1-80 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � May 20, 1980 Page 2 s 4 II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: � j. 1 . Zone Change is in conformance with the land use designation contained in the ; Comprehensive Plan. t' ,� 2. No attempt to address the sensi�ive lands areas has been made ' in this application. Page 8 of the Third Report ZCPD 1-80 states "maximum s preservation of these natural fPatures as an amenity is the most significant � 6 element for community uniqueness and identity as well as an important � marketing factor for the project". - i Y Page 10 states "Because the natural. drainage ways provide a system of carrying � run-off water from adjacent properties and contains water much of the time, �� their preservation is important to the immediate area. Proper maintenance of EI, fihese areas is essential to preserve their functian and should not be �I left to the responsibility of the individual property owners should lotting �I be allowed to continue into this portion of the project. �''' , 3. Half-street improvements to Durham Road should be addressed. A deed restric- �I tion on each parcel should be added clearl.y stating that each property owner [. �_.. wi11 participate in the imgrovements of Durham Road thr.ough a Local Improvement ; Dis[rict foxmation. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staf� recommends approval with the following conditi.ons: � � 1. A Homeowner's Agreement be prepared tor the maintenance of the sensitive € lands area to the east of this site to include brushing, tree pruning, etc. �� prior to issuance of Building Permits. This agreement shall be approved by the Public Works Director and the City Counci.l. Should future development � d be approved �Q.r the remaining areas (Stage II) a simi7ar agreement lj shall be drawn to ensure that the complete area is maintained and protected. � 2. A restriction shall appear as a part of the final plat indicating that each parcel owner sha11 not remonstrate against the future formation of a Loca1 Improvement District to improve Durham Road. 3. Lots 1, 4, 7, 8, 9, ]0, 18, 19, and 20 shall be modified so that no portion of same shall encroach in sensitive land. 4. Culs-de-sac shall have fifty (50°) feet right-of-way, thirty-faur (34�) feet of paving. � �r.,_ : _ .. _. _. , _ �,� STAFF REPORT - AGENDA 5.6/ZCPD 1-80 TIGARD PLAN�IING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 3 5. Necessary right-of-way dedication shall be made ta provide forty-five (45') feet from the centerline of SW Durham Road to the property line along the entire northern boundary of this property. 6. A].1 Conditions under Title 17, Tigard Muniaipal Code,. shall be adhered to in filing the preliminary and f.inal plat for review b ,the various de artments Y P of the Ca.ty. 7. Access to Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 should be. re-designed to lessen the impact onto Serena Way at a corner. Re-design to be submitted prior to consideration of final, plat plan. Public Works Direc.tor to review and approve. No direct access to SW Durham Road shall be allowed. 8. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until allconditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspeCtions verifying this havE been carried out by the appropriate depar�ment. 9. No changes will be made to approved pl.ans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are � approved by that department. Application for changes will ?�e made in `'' writing and sha11 include applicable drawings. 10. Grading plans and construction plans on all public right-of-ways sha11 be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of wark. � 11 . Pulslic water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 12. A11 exzsting or proposed utilities sha11 be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 13. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiratian of the twenty (20) day appeal period from the date of approval. 14. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance af a Building Permit. 1S. A11 existing easements recorded with this parcel shall be reviewed with applicant and the City prior to filing of a preliminary plat. � , _ � .. ,:: . . ��°: :, . . _ _ .., , _ ..._.... , _.... ._.,, . . .._ .�. . _ . _. _.. .. <:�. r:: M 4 � STAFF REPORT �,_; AGENDA 5.6/ZCPD 1-80 TIGARU PLANNING GOMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 4 16. Stage II Concerns. If the Planning Commission approves 5tage I and rules that Condition #3 be ugheld, the same Condition should be applied to lots in Stage II in the same area to the south. If this is the ease, the lots will be below the R-7 Comprehensive Plan Designation and the proposed road alignment will be subject to chazige. Staff is concerned that we will be "forced" to accept the lotting pattern unless street right-of-ways are addressed as in Stage I. One alternative is to re-design the street patterns fram the southern cul-de-sac shown in Stage I througl�z that porti.on of Stage II to the south. A fif�y (50') faot right-of-way will be required for all public streets with thirty�four (34') feet of paving. Prio� to a General Plan Review, the applicant sha11 re-aesign the abutting parcel ta the south to shaw an adequate circulation gatterr�. �„� / o , Planning Director � iy }y ( f � � i i �-'� . . k . � . . . �� . . , I �� ,,_ STAFF REPORT , �L AGENDA 5.7 TIGARD PLANNZNG COMMI5SION ' May 20, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. , Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard , DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 13-80 and II SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, M 3-80 (KIT�LESON/BROWN) I APPLICANT: Raymond ,7. Kittleson and OWNER: L. R. Davis and �I Milton O. Braan R. M. Starkweather i Rt. 2, Box 474K 7415 SW Bonita �i La Center, Washington 98629 Tigard, Oregon 97223 I APPLICATION DATE: 4/30/80 ' I RLQUEST: For a Preliminary Plan Review for a Planned Unit Development i in a Light Industrial Zone and Zone Map Amendment for � A) R-7 "Single Family Residential" to M-3PD "Light Industrial Zone Planned Development Distric�" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 1, Tax Lot 1400; B) M-3 "Light Industrial Zone" to M-3PD "Light Industrial Zone Planned Development District" on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 700 and Tax Map 2S1 12BA, Tax I,ot 100. r � ' LQCATION: 7415 SW Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1, Tax Lot 1400 and Tax Map 2S1 12BA, Tax Lot 100 and Tax Map 2SI 12A, Ta� Lot 700) . I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1, Tax Lot 140Q appears to be yery close to eighty (80�) percent within the � one-hundred-year floodplain of Fanno Creek which is a designated greenway ; area. The majority of land on Tax Lot 700 is in the floodplain and designated Greenway. Tax Lot 100 is about fifty (50�) percent in the floodplain/' greenway. The adopted Comprehensive Plan Map clearly defines these areas and future reference is made to these areas in the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan adopted by Council in August of 1977. 2. Policies 1 through 6 on pages 9 through 11 of the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan clearly indicate that th�se areas are to be protected. 3. Chapter 18.57 Sensitive Lands, Section .010 Statement of Intent states "Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuit��ble£or development because of location within the one-hundred-year floodplain. . .." Sec�tion 18.57.020 Definitions under "Greenway°' states "Greenway means all lands within the one-hundred-year flaodplain of Fanno Creek and the Tualatin River and the lands on either side of natural drainage ways as designated by the Park Board and Comprehensive Plan for preservation". � .� „ _ , _ . _ STAFB' REPORT AGENDA 5,7/ZCPD 13-80, M 3-80 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 20, 1980 Page 2 4. Section 18.57 Sensitive Lands, Section .040 Uses and activities allowed with a Special Use Permi.t does allow fill, grading, structures, and off- street parking, and service drives, however, 5ectian .060 Special Use Permits is very specific in requiring detailed submission of documents to meet the stringent requirements of the Code. These documents have no�t been submitted in detail. 5. Applicant's narrative relative to sensitive lands states - "The open spac:e in the floodplain, excluding parking areas, constitutes forty (40�) percent of the total site". No calculations have been submitted which clearly in dicate the actual, p recise, measurements of proposed buildin.g areas, parking areas, service drive areas, etc. in relationship to floodplain and greenway areas. 6. No mention is made in this application about a service drive to the north. Culdde-sac length cannot exceed 400 feet without a Variance being granted by the Planning Commission. No Variance application has been received. A service drive does appear on the site plan, however, no property dedicatian is on file which would make this drive possible at this time. No railroad crossing permits are included in this application. �_. Proposed street from Bonita north is 2500 feet long approximately, and is anly twenty (20') feet wide. A standard local street, a public street, is mandating with forty (40') feet of paving at the minimum. This street could eventually become a part of a l.arger system serving a larger area. These concerns are shared by the Fire Marshall. At least two ingress/egress points are mandatory. 7. Tigard Water District to install main lines to main system to insure adequate fire-flow to this project. The Fire Marshall insists upon this as a minimum requirement. II. CONCLUSTONARY FINDINGS: l. Proposed uses seriously violate the exp ressed purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan Designation of floodplain and greenway and Environmental Open Space Plan and the policies outlined in the Environmental D�sign and Open Space Plan are not addressed in submitted documents. 2. The transpoxtation system is not appropriate based upon prelirr�.inary review by the Fire Department. No "escape" route is shown. No Variance �, request has been made for a cul-de-sac length above 400 feet. � 3. No railrnad crossing permi.ts have been granted by the Public Utilities Commission. This will be necessazy to serve thiy site. '.�he arrow "to � Hall Boulevard" across the north of the plan seems to ha�e been added , as an "after thought". Na mer�tion i;s made of this street alignment in the narrative. . ' � STAF'F REpO,RT ,� AGENDA 5.7/ZCPD 13-80, M 3-80 � TIGA�2D PLANNING COMMI5SION May 20, 1980 Page 3 The ingress/egress point or� Bonita Road should align with 74th Avenue. This intersection is just below an elevatecl railroad crossing and will create a serious hazard unless appliaant can resolve the site distance difficulties. III. 5TAFF RF,COMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Denial of this Preliminary Plan with no appeal to City Council. When Staff is satisfied that the following conditions have been met, the appTicant shall return at the Preliminary Plan Review stage before �the Planning Commission. 1. Calculation be submitted showing building coverage related to floodplain, greenway, open space, parking, easements, driveways, etc. Basis for I these calculations shall be taken from the Tigard Municipal Code. Sta£f feels that without these calculations, we cannot evaluate this proposal. I 2. Attention be given to a public street system throughout this proj�ct �, connecting to either Hall Boulevard or 72nd Avenue. Applicant to have 'I applied for and been granted a railroad crossing permit for either ' location. A letter from adjoining property owners consenting to dedicated I �, rights-of-way through said property shall be in evidence. �, 3. More attention shall be given to the intent and purpose of the Sensitive Lands Special Use Permit. As submitted, this plan avoids the iznportant concerns of protecting and maintaining the £loodplain and greenway areas. 4. Standard City 5treets be provided with at least two (2) ingress/egress , points - one (�.1� on Bonita and possibly two (2) to the north. 5. A11 concerns of the Fire Marshall must be satisfiea prior to further ; review by the Planning Commission. � rd, Plannin� Director _. _ _ �,,, _ _, - � , ' h �_ M E M O R A N U U M Tp; PLANN:�NG COMMISSION, May 20, 1980 mee�ing � FROM: PLr'�NNINf� DTRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-80 AGENDA 5.8a Attached is a draft ordinance amending Chapter 18.24 of the Tigard Municipal . Code relative to the Multifamily Residential Zones (i.e. A-12, A°20, A-40) . The praposed land use designations provide for development to a density of twelve (12) , twenty (20) , and forty (40) multifamily unit$ per gross acre, respectively. The general purpose for the said amendment is to bring the zoning mapJzoning text into conformance with the CitX's Comprehensive 1Plan. Mor� specifically, the change reflects the statewide housing objective (Goal #10) in regards to ensuring that sufficient buildable land has been set aside for each needed housing type. Furthermore, the change is in keeping with the Tigard Housing Plan which shows a long-term trend toward a greater por�ion of the fami.lies choosing alternative housing types, in this case, multifamily dwelling units. �,' �. �>. . _ . ._ . ,. .. ., ...�. .. ..,. . .; �s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 8Q- AN ORDINANCE AMENDTNG CHAPTER 18.24 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO MULTIFAMSLY RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the primary objective of the statewide housing goal (Goal #10 Housixag) is to ensure that sufficient bui.ldable land has been set aside for each needed housing type; and WHEREAS, changes in thxs section wi11 ensure that the City will plan and provide reasonable oppo'rtunity for an appropriate variety of housing inorder �o m�et the needs, desires, and resources of all categories of people who may desire to live within its boundarias; and WHEREAS, it has been found that the changes reflect the City's Housing Poli.cy, establishing a long-term trand toward a greater portion of the families choosing multifamily housing; and out of economic necessity I I NOW, THEREFOkZE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: I ' �.. SECTION 1: Chapter 18.24 of the Tigard Munir.ipal Code, relating to multifamily residential, be amended to reflect established City housing policies calling for an increasing need for a larger peraentage of multifamily units xn the future: SEE EXHIBIT "A" AT'!'ACHED SECTION 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary to the peace, health, and safety of the public that the foregoing change in the City's records become effective, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective immediately after its passage by the Council and approval of the Ma.yor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present this d�y of , 1980, after being read two times by number and title only. Recorder - City of Tigard APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of , 1980. �, Mayor - City of Tigard Ordinance No. 80- ZOA 2-80 �r,,.. _ . . _ , . . . .... ... .. . ... ._ . .. .r ,. ,...<. _ ,. ROUGH DRAFT EXHIBIT A � I CHAPTER 18.24 I �* MLJLTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE � (A-12, A-20, A-40) * � 1 SECTIONS � , I8.24.010 Permitted uses � 18.24.Q20 Lot requirements (A-12) 18.24,030 Setback requirements 18.24.040 Buildin g height � 18.24.050 Additional requirements ; 18.24.060 Usable open space and recreation areas � 18.24.070 Lot req,uirements (A-20) 18.24.080 Setback requirements 18.24.090 Building height 18.24.100 Additional requirements 18.24.110 UsabZe open space and recreation areas 18.24.120 Lot requirements (A-40) 18.24.130 5etback requirements 18.24.140 Building height � 18.24.150 Additional requirements � 18.24.160 Usable open space and recreation areas �, �I � I � �k ii � � � � � �' � �`._'..,. . . . ...... . . .. ...... .. . ..... ... . ... .�.. . .., ... .... .. .. . ...,r��. . ; . � _ _ . , .. .. :. � , �''� � i ��. }. � 18.24.010 Permitted uses. No building structures or land shall be used M, and no building or structure shall be herPafter erected, enlarged or altered in the A-12, A-20, and A-40 zone except for the fiollowing uses: F' 1) Apartment dwellings, townhouses, and/or condominiums containing �'' ��' r three (3) or more dwelling units; �, ;: bi e k ii 2) Mo 1 home ar (must be five (5) aares or more) , :� P 'I�i�, _ 'II 18.24.020 Lot requirements. In the A-12 zane the lot requirements shall I be as follows: � 1) When used for multifamily residential purposes, the minimum lot area � { shall be as follows: � � � Density Dwelli.ng Units � Number of Dwelling Units �Lot Ar�a Per Dwelling Unit �er Gross Acre 3 and up 3,630 sq. ft. 12 2) The minimum average lot width shall be sixty (60') feet except on a l cul-de-sac where minimum width shall be sixty (60') feet at the building 1ine. � 3) Buildings shall not occupy more than the following percentage o� the ` lot area: Number of Dwelling Units Percentage of Lot Coveiage 3 to 20 45� 21 to 40 50� 41 and up 55� i � i 18.24.030 Setback requirements. Except as may otherwise be provided in ; Section 18.12.100, the setl�zcks for uses in the A-12 zone shall be as follows: i 1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of twenty (20') feet. I 2) The side yard shall be a miniznum of ten (10') feet, i �- � P�a9� 2 ��. 3) On corner lots the setback shall be twenty (20') feet on any side facing a street other than an alley. 4) Where buildings are grouped as one project on one tract of land, the minimum distance between two buildings at any given poxnt shall not be less than t�e sum of the required side yards computed separately for each building at tlzat point. 18.24.040 Building height. Except as o�therwise provided in Section 18.12.110, no building in the A--12 zone shall exceed a height of two (2) stories or thirty (30°) feet whiehever is less. 18.24.050 Additional requirements. Additional reguirements applicable � � in the A-�12 zone include, but are not limited to, the following: ��, 1) Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60. 2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18.64. 3) Apartment dwellings, provided that any common boundary between an A-12 zone and any other residential zone exists sha11 be screened by a fence � obscuring the sight �f normal adjacent pedestrian and vehicular traffic, the � �; erection of which sYiall be the responsibility of the property ownership in ?' �. the A-12 zone, see also Section 18.12.080. j; � 4) Site design review. A],l development in the A-12 zone shall be � submi,tted for site design review and shall be subject to the conditions, limitations, � prohibitions, and requirements of Ch.apter 18.59 � ( 18.24.060 Usable open space and recreation areas. An area or areas for �: usable open space and recreational purposes shall be provided in multifamily : � developments. The provision and maintenance of open space and/or recreation;�l areas shall be the continuing obligation of the property owner(s) or homeoFmer� : through an a:greement approved by the City. A minimum of two hw�dred (200) square feet of recreation area shall be provided for each - Page 3 t .. _ _ , . ,. .,., _.. .:.:.; �,, . cf. the first twenty (20) dwelling una.ts; two hundred fifty (250) square feet f�r uriits twenty-one (21) throught thirty (30) ; and three hund�ed (300) square feet for each unit over thirty (30) . The surface area of reereation bui.ldings, including swimming pools may be in�luded in computing the minimum size of the area. Recreatianal facilities shall be provided in keeping with the need of the prospective t�nants. Recreation areas shall not be located in parking ar maneuvering areas,. but may be located in required yards, easily accessible and with a mi,n�imum five (5') foot landscape strip along any lot boundary upon which a �ard is requized. Table for Computing Multifamily Open Space Requir�ments • Dwellinq Units Minimum Square .Feet . 10 2,000 . 20 4,000 30 6,500 ' �': 40 9,500 50 12,500 60 15,500 i � �;. Paae 4 _ ' • ' �8.24.D70 Lot requirements. In the A-20 zone, the lot requirements shall be as follows: I) When used for multifamily resi.dential purposes the minimum lot area �'° shall be according to the fo�.lowing table: ' • Density Dwelling Uni�, Number �t Llwellin� Units L•ot Area Per Dwellin� Unit per Gross Acre , � 3 and up 2,178 20 • 2) The mi.niznum average lot width shall be sixty (60') feet except on a aul-de-sac where minimum width shall be sixty (60'? feet at the building line. 3� B ui.ldin�s shall not occupy more than t,he following percentage of the l�t areas: . INw�nber of Dwelling Units Percentage of Lot Caverage 3 to 20 45$ 21 to 40 50� 41 and up ' 55� 18.2�.080 Setback requirements, Except as may otherwise be provided in Sept.ion ].8.12.1OQ, the setbacks far uses in the A-20 zone shall be as follows: ' 1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of forty (40') feet. !' �_ 2) The side �ard shall be a minimum of ten (10') feet. � �. Page 5 • ..��.,,. ,_ _ .�.�,-� , . �.„ 3) On corner lots, the setback shall be twenty (20') feet on the side facing a street (other than the street with the address) . 4) The rear yard shall be twenty (20') feet. 5) Where buildings are grouped as one project on one tract of land, the minimum distanae between two buildings at any given point shall not be less than the sum of the required side yards computed separately for each building at that point. 18.24.090 Building height. Exaept at othexwise prnvided in Section 18.12.110, no building in the A-20 zone shall exceed a height of four (4) stories or sixty (f 0°) feet whichever is less. 18.24.100 Additional requirements. Additianal requirements applicable � in the A-20 zorre include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60. 2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18.64. 3) Apartment dwellings, provided that any common boundaxy between an A-20 zone and any other residential zone exists shall be screened by a fence obscuring the sight of normal adjacent pedestri,an and vehicular traffie, the erection of which shall be the responsibility of the property owner. in the A-20 zone, see also Section 18.12.080. 4) Site design review. A11 develapment in the A-20 zone shall be submitted forsite design review and shall be subject to the conditions, limi,tations, prohibitions, and requireme�nts of Chapter 18.59. 5) Planned development distra,ct. All parcels,desiqnatec� A-20 must be rezoned, and subject to the sta�dard, as planned develo,pment districts before � any future development may take place in order to provide oppoxtuni�ies to create more desirable environments through the application of flexible and diversified Page 6 �• �: land development standards (Chapter 1�.56) . Planned development districts shall not be established on less than one acre of contiguous land unless the Planning Commission finds otheYwise. 6) Density. Computation of density on the buildable portion of the site designated A-20 is as follows: Total site area less sensitive lands = Gross buildable area Gross buildable area less 20� for public improvements less usable recreational/open space = Net buildable area Net buildable area/lot area per dwelling unit = Total number of units For multifamily planned unit development, up to a twenty (20�) percent increase wi11 be considered above the maximum allowable density�as determined above�to compensate the owner for the land for �nly sensitive land dedication � of apen space, and/or recreational areas in the City. 18.24.110 Usable open space and recreation arease An area or areas for usable open .space and recreatonal purposes shall be provided in multifamily develapments. 7."he provision and maintenance of open space and/or recreational areas shall be the continuing obligation of the property owner(s) or homeowners thxough an ag,x�ee�ent approved by the Ci,ty. 1� znini„tt�um of two hundred (200) square feet of recreation area shall be provided for each of. the first twenty (20) dwelling units; two hundred fifty (250) square feet for units twenty-one (21) through thrity (30) ; and three hundred (300) square feet for each unit over thirty (30) . The surface area of recreation buildings, including swimming pools may be included in computing the minimum size of the a�rea. Recreational facilities shall be provid�ad in keeping with the need of the prospective tenants. Recreation areas shall not be loc:ated in li � parking or maneuvering areas, but may be located in require d yards, easily I I accessible and with a minimum five (5) foot landscape strip along any lot boundary upon which a yard is required. � Page 7 ! Table for Coznputing Multifamily Open Space Requirements ' � • Dwellin� Units Minimum Square Feet � 10 2,000 . 20 4,000 30 6,500 � � 40 3,500 50 12,500 � 60 1:5,500 yg,24_ 120 I,ot requi.rements. In the A-40 zone, the lot requirements shal]. , be as follaws: 1) W'hen used for multifamily residential puxposes the minimum lot area 3ha11 be according ta the following table: • D�e�nsity Dwelling Unit, � Nuznber of Dwe�.ling Units � L•ot Area Per Dwelling Unit Per Gross Acre 3 and up 1,089 sq, ft. 40 ( 2) The minimiun average lot width shall be sixty (60') feet except on a I wul-de-sac where minimum width shall be sixty (60'? feet at the building l�.ne, 3) B ui.l.dings shall not occupy more than the following percentage of the � lot areas: . Number of Dwelling Units Percentage of Lot Coverage � � 3 to �0 . 45$ �.. 21 to 40 50� , 41 and up � 55� 18.24. 130 �etback requirements. Excep t as may otherwise be provided 3.n �, Sectiozs 18.12.100, the setbacks for uses in the A-40 zone shall be as follo�as: �I ' 1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of foxty (40') feet. � 2) 2'he side yard shall be a minimum of ten (10') feet. � � � ! _ � . _ ! , ! � . i I �� • I Page 8 . � , i > , a �'., 3) On corner iots, the setback shall be twenty (20') fe�t on the side facing a stxeet (other than the street with the address) . 4) The rear y�ard shall be twenty (20') feet. 5) Where buildings are grouped as one projec� on one tract of land, the mi.nimum distance between two buildings at any given point shall not be less than the sum. of the required side yards computed separately tor each building at that point. 18.24.140 Building height. Except at othe raise provided in Section 18.12.110, no building in the A-40 zone shall. exceed a height of four (4) stoxies or sixty (60') feet whichever is lessp unless a height variance is granted by the Planning Commission. � 18.24.150 Additional requix�ements. Additional requirements applicable �- in the A-4Q zone include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Off-street parking and loafling, see Chapter 18.60. 2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18.69�. 3) Apartment dwellings, provided that any common bounc3ary between an ; A"�d zone and any other residential zone exists shall be screened by a fence � obscuring the sight of normal adjacent pedestri.an and vehicuI.ar traffic, the i e.rection of which shall be the responsibility of the property ownership in � the A-40 zone, see also Section 18,12.080. 4) Site design review. Al1 development in the �A-40 zone shall be � submi.tted to site design review and shall be subject to the conditions, lim:a.tations, � prohibitions, and requirements of Chapter 18.59. � 5) Planned development district. All parcels,designated A-40 �ust be II � �r rezoned, and �ub�ect to� the stand�;�si, as planned deyelopment distxicts before (I t� (' any ft�ture development may t�ke place inorder to pr,ovidc apportunities �o create 'I more desirable environments through the application of flexible and ciiversified Page 9 • � „_ ,. �. ; , , a � . land dev�lopment standards (Chapter 18.56) . Planne� development districts shall not be established on less than one acre of contiguous land unless the Planning Commission finds otheraise. 6) Density. Computai:ion of density on the buildable portion of the site designated A-40 is as follows: Total site area less sensitive lands = Gross buildable area Gross buildable area less 20� for public improvements less usable recreational/open space = Net buildable area Net buildable area/lot area per dwelling unit = Total number of units For multifamiZy planned unit development, up to twenty (20�) percemt increase will be considered above the maximum allowable density, as determined above, to compensate the owner for the land for on].y sensitive land dedication of open space, and/or recreational areas in the City. I � ,t� Minimum Site Size: West Pnrtland Heights A-40 Subdiva.sion area, Tigard � � Tigangle, NPO #4; due to the unusual. lotting pattern of sma11 parcels (25' x100') in the West Portland Heights Subdivision, the portion of this Subdivision which is designated A-40 by the Comprehensive Plan is declared to be an ; i "isolated problem" (Under Seation 18.56.070 of the Tigard Municipal Code) , a � where the Planning Commission may allow an A-40 Planned Development on contiguous t 4 };' sites of at least 20,000 square feet, when the applicant for a planned clevelopment 'r.� x � can show that the following conditions exist: A) The lotting, ownership, or existing development pattern an the specific � ;' ,: block prevents development of a viable, one acre minimum site; or f ; k B) The authorization of a smaller site size will not be materially � C detrintental to the purposes of this Title, be injurious to property E i i f in the zone or vicinity in which the property is located, or be other,wi.se detrimental ta th� objectives of any City development, plan, or policy. �: 1 � Page '10 ' � K �. A T . � 18.24.I60 Usable apen space and recreation areas. An area or areas for � �`' usable open space and recreational purposes shal,l be provided in multifamily �.� developments. 7.'he provision and maintenance of open space and/or recreational areas sYzall be the continuing obligation of the propexty owner(s) or homeowner{s) through an agreement approved by the City. A mi.nimum of two hundre d (200) square feet of recreation area shall be provided for each of the first twenty , (20J dwelling units; two hundred fifty (250) square feet for units twenty-one (21} through thirty (30) ; and three hurzdred (300) square feet f�r each unit over thirty (30) . The surface area of recreation buildings, including swimming pools may be included in computing the minimum size of the area. Recreational facilities sha11 be provided in keeping with the ne�d of the prq�spective tenants. Rscreation areas shall not be located in parking or maneuvering areas, but ma.y be located in required yaxds, easily accessible and with a minimum five (5') foot landscape strip along any lot � boundary upon which a yard is required. Dwelling Units Nlinimum Square Feet 10 2,000 �� 4,000 30 6,500 40 9,500 50 12,500 60 15,500 �;< P�9e 11 _ > M E M 0 R A N D U M �� TO: PLANNING C�MMISSION, Meeting May 20, 1980 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RE1'�IAND OF CHAPTER 18.36 HIGHWAY COMMERCII3L ZONE (C-5) , ZOA 4-80 � AGENDA 5.8b The City Council has requested that you re-examine the lot requirements - � Section 18.36.020 (3) - "The maximum lot coverage shall be forty (40�) percent. � . I, f You will remember that we raised this fi.gure from twenty-five (25�) percent to forty % � (40�) percent. Mr. Bishop appeare d before you and the Council requested � fifity (50�) percent. You brought it up to forty (40�) percent as a compromise. Coiancil ciid not wa.sh to use the fifty �50�) percent figures until you had a �; chance t� review. I'. Y' c � % f 1' r '.. �`I I�.I f'li �'I � . � ard !�'� �I �� l i. ��;I{� i� � ; ?� 4 � I �. i y ,ti,� ... .. .. ..�.:.. . . . .. . ..... .. . . . _.. . .. .. . . . .. . . . _ . .. _. . . .. .. ._ . ..._ . � .... . . .. .. . . . . _ .� r ''' •' t n �iYr CITY OF TIGARD, OREG0IV OFtDINA,.'`10E iVO. 80- AN OFZT�INANl� AMENDING CHAPTr.R 18.36 OF T:� TTG� MUNZCI�i LCODE, Rc^,LATIiVG TO AIGF?YJaY CO1�L�RCIAL ZQN� (C-5) � DECLARING AN EM�RGEDrCY AND FIXING p1V EFgFCTIV� DAT.x.'. . ' 'II3E QTY OF TTG_AF� QEtDA2NS AS FOLLOWS: � Section 1: That Section 18,36 of the Tigard t•?unicipal. Code be amen�ed to read as f o1l.ows: "SEE EX'r3IBIT A" Section 2� Inasmuch as it is necessary to the peace, healfih, and s��G�� vf the public that the foregoing cha.nge in the City's records becona effecti.ve, an e�r;e.^..y is her�by decla�3 to e:ci.st� and this ordznance shall k�e effective upan its passage by -the Council a.*�d a�proval bv the Mayor. P�SSED: By vate of all Council memoers presenL this � � �� day of , 19�0 aftpr �eing read two tiznes . by number and tit].e only. ' � � Recorder - City of Tigar3 APPROVED: By 'the Mayox,this day of , 1980. ' Maypr - City of Tigard • � Ordinance No. 80- 20A 4-8q • I ; _ __ _ _ EXH28IT A . . Chapter 18.36 HIGHWAY CO�`�T��P,�T_.�.L, ZONG IC-S) . ��, Sections; 18.36.010 Pez'mitted uses. 18. 36.015 Conditienal uses. � 18.�6.02�J Lat m�uire:r.snts. � 18.36.030 5etbac:c requi.rr°:�nts. . 18.36.040 Building height. ].8.36.05Q Additional require�nts. 1$.36.010 Pezzaitted Lses_ Na building, struct�e or la*:d shall be used 3.~�d na bui.lciing or st;uctuze shazl. be hereaxtz� erected, enlargad or al.tered in the C-5 zane e,:�ce�t as follaws: . ' (1) General retail usas (excludi.*�g automobile, boat and trailer or mobile ' , home sales) : � , (2) Bank or other financial institution; , (3) Administrative, professional, medical and general offices. 18.36.OI5 �ondi.ticr.�,l uszs. Lz t'�is zor�e. t;e foll,�w�n; �,Srs a.�!d their ! auccesso rf uses is pe r.nitted as conditianal us�s when in accorcanc� with the i 3Procedural r�quiremen�s of G'�apter 18.72 and 18.84: ' � � • Il) Mina-war��aouse storage a.nd office warehause; � � , (2) Restaurant 18.36.020 Lot requiramer.-ts, In the C-5 zone, the 1ot re•:�uirem�nts sha?I, y be as `ollows; ° (1) The mini�un lot ar�a s:�all be twenty thousand squar eA ; a (2) The mini.mum lot wi�t`� sha3.1 be on ' red fee�; /fL i (3) The maximum lo�t covera�e shall b fort-� percent �0 �� . E� 18.36,�30 Setbac�C requi,.rements. Except as �y be ath se provided in �� Section 18.12.1Q0, the sett�acks for nonresidentizl uses in the C-5 zone shall �� be as follows: • ' � � (1) Front yard se�back (measured from the property line at the requ�red ?' s treet right-of-way line). shall be twenty feet, The set�hack s�y be less fihan ° the twenty ieet,provided that it is not less than ten feet, and that an arza �, equal to the area af encroachment be ad�ed ta the t�aent;� percent mi.nim�n la.ndsca�in� requirem�nts; �" (2) Si�e and rear yard se�backs shall be twenty feet. The se t�ack �� may be Ie�s tharz twenty feet provid�d that it is not less than ten £eet, and �� t�'�at a..n area e�u�. to the �ez o� encro�chment be �.dd�d to ths twen�y p�rcent �° mir.imu.n Zaandscaping requize�nent, a.zd that tha side or rear yard is no� abutting a resi.eensial zcne (singl.e fa*nil.y or multia a.�ni.ly) . 1�. 30.0�0 guil,�n hei ht. Exce t as o�herwise �� ' g 5 P `' provided i.n Sec�.ian � f� 18. 12.�110, no nuild.ing in th� C-5 zone shall exceed a hPight oE two staries or � t`�irty-�ive feet,whichever is Iess. ;� �, �, . t, • `f # ' . � �, ,. , , �.... __: _: : ._.. _ . .... i ., .,�.. . . , . , . . ° 18.36.050 Additional reauiEe^tents_ Additional require:�ents a�plicahle to the C-5 znr_e incluce, �u± sha1Z not be 2i�ted to, the �ollowi.n�: (1) Off-str°et parking and loading, see Ch�pter 18�60; ��'° (�) par!ci.zig shall be allo.�ed in the setback areas, aut no closer than six fe°_t to �he pro�erty line on any si�p. On a corner, no parking shall be :allowed in the trizr:gle £or�d by the cnrner and a point �neasured twenty feet i`r�r,c t.`:e corner aiang each street; � (3) �ccess �*�d eg�ess req,uired, see Chapter 18,64; (4) Landscaping required, twenty gercent o.f the totaT area sha11 be landsczped as�c� a por*...ion of this shzll be 31ang the total perimeter of the � p�operty. A site obscux�ing screen shall be planted alang any side abutting a residential znne. . ' (5) �igns pe.rm.itted, r�ne f.ree-stazzdizg pro�erty id?ntification ground �i �ig� shall be cermi.tted �or the developrer�t on each side aY�utting a s�reet. Ota a carner, a ground sign mzy n�t protrude into t�he ttiangle forrc�ed by the corner a.nd a point m�asured �wenty feet fxam the corner along eaca street; the a,aac:.nz:� heic,ht of �his siyn sha?1 be seven ze�t, and it shal,l not exceed ' six�y srivare feet ia area. This sign sh�all not be internally i.11ua�.nated;nor ahall, thers be any exrosed neon �ubas or othes bu3.bs, ar.d illumi.nat�.on �shall be cf low intensity, otse wall sign shall be pezmi��ed ror ea.cn separatp ' � use, the area of which shall not exceec� ten square feet in ax�ea. No moving o� intermitte:�tly flashing signs shal.l be �erm�.tfi,ed; � � (6) Nui.sance prohibited, see Section 18.12.07Q; � , fi (-07 iur C�']CL1�:iviliric3 t1T).li.S� 2}La`a�il:� iaY:Sr Ct'i2:tGi�°3a�`:.',w5y O:C ct+ly�' 0�:::�b � noise-�roducing equipne.zt, and servica entzancas, Ioading or unloading doors, � aJarbaqe cans or contair.ers, shall be so enclosec� and bafsled that no di.sturbi.nq sound or vibration ma.te�ially affect adjacent o�sid�ntial proper��es. : � ,` (8) A11 t3evelopmenr in t-his 2one sha11 be s�ject ta Site Desigzi Review " • critera:a established under Chapter 18,59. . . �,' ' �!� , . . ' ' � . , I ' � . �, ! � � . �} i� �. � � � � . ; �agz 2 . � .,. ,- _ , i,,�' ' . ' . 3.8.36_O10 . , , � . a . /'� ��' =d�ca in . A minimum of fif . . ercen r A �. P p t ° ' tot�I 2c, area - 1 be landsc�.ped• 'n additior�,�- ee C�IZ,�)t�sr5 18.58 ,/S`i�e Dev �opme Ian . ' 18 .5g, A �I4r�ectural Ilnsign Revz.e�v; � (6) ' isances pr ' ? ited, � ion I,8 .12 .070. (gxd. ,75-29 § part) , 197 . Orc� . 7 §7 (part) , �.k-t-.Q.�d. 70-32 §150- , 1970} . • . ;- '� Chanter I8.36 / / _ ,�► � . - .�TU�m�� ,-�__�Tr°�--• ._•,-�nn Cat`�L.ti?ERCIAI, ZO�iE (C-5) * Sections : � 18.35,010 Pernizted uses. 18.36.020 Lot requirements. I8. 36,0 3 Q Setback requir�em�n�s. 18.36 .Od0 Buil.dinq hAisi�,t. � 1.8. 36.45� F�d�.�'ir.na� �-�r-nirc:-��r�+�c ,._-_�._......___ _�... _..�... . • . • . 18.36. 010 Per:nitted uses. No bui?ding , �t�uc�ure or ' land s'r_a�l be used and no buildin or � g structure _hall be h�i�_ a�t=r ar°c��, �nlarged or alt�red in th� C-5 zone e�cent fo,- �f��`� tne following uses, and provi�e3 that an- cne deJeloo.:�Er�t ' �`•- ar.y one area shall not exc�a� two acrea in size {u��e�s speeif� ically dDD2'OV2CI by tne pl.anning and zoninq cc�issi�n� , and that the nucleus of such a neighborhQOd development sha�.l can- tain a riini:�um of four of the fa�l4wing sep�?-3�� uses: 4 1) Baker�, provided any manufacture cf goo�.s is lira- ited• ta gvods retailed en the pr�rnises only; • , � 'C Z) Barbershflp; � ' ( 3) Beaut�r parlor; . � ( 4) Coi�.nction station far dry-cleani.nc� o�. I.at:n�ry; . ( 5) Delicatessen store; ( fi) Dflctoz�, dentist, lawyer, arch?tec-� or �.nsurance office; C' 7) Drug store or phar�acy including incidenta� four_- tain service but nat including any otner use unless spec�,f- icall.y permitted under this chapter; ( A) Flar�st 9r ,��4wer shap: � �) Gift shop; (10) Groc�ry stare; • (lI) Laun�'romat; � . (12) Meat marke-�; . � (13) Shoe repair; (I4) Sta��or.2ry ar.d book stores open to persons of aIl �,� ages without patzonagz restrictions ; , . For sign regulaticans , s�e Chapters 16 . 36 and 16 .40 o� this code . 2 7 2-3 ' (.'S',i qa zd....�/15/7 6.) _ ... . . :.._-.'., '� , ` , � I8.36.a20--I8.36.050 , µ, t � � , , . .•• � � I8. �6. 020 Lot recuirezents. In the C-5 zone the 1ot � require:nents si�`I1 be as fali aws . � fl) Th� mininun Iot ar�a shall be t�.�enty thousand square ��et; (2) The minimum Zo r width shal.I Iae one hundred feet; (3) The maximum Iot cove�aqe snall �e�twenty-fzve pe=_ eent. (O�d. 70-3Z §I.55-2, I970) < — I8. 36.030 Set�ack reQUi�e�ents. Excen-� as may b� ather- wise p_ovidec in Section 18 .i �I.aO , thC setbacks for nonre�i- dential use� in the C-5 zonz snal.l be as ��Il.ows. (1) Frr�n� yard 5et�ac.� tTeasured fror� th.e praP°rty l�,ne at the r�quired street rig�t-oi-•,�ay Iine) sh�1,I b� t,hi��y feet. The sPtback may be I.e�s than tr.irty faefi nrovided � that i� is not less than t�R feet, aTZd that an ar�a ��ual to the area vf enczoa��nnt �e a3de� to fi.he �w¢ntx p�rcent mi.ni- murti Iandscaping requiremeats; . (2) Side and rear dard setbacks sh.al,]. be t�wenty £��t. The setb�ck may be Iess than twenty feet nrovi,ded that x�. zs � not less thaa ten fe�t, and t�!a� an arva �c�L:��, �o ��Ze area G�' encroacnr;lent be added to t��e ��ren.�.y �er��ii�: mi.ninun Ia;d-� scaping requirer�ent, and that the �ide ox x�a� Xax�d is z�c�t- : a�u��.in: a resid�P_Zi31 zone (single fa��i.�,y car mu�tifamily) . (Ord. 70-32 §I55-3 , I970) a I8. 36.a 40 Huild�ner he?ght. Exeept �s other�ri.�e pro- ,t e�,��.._ vic:ed in Section 18 .12.�10 , na buildin _ �:x exce�d a hei,qht of one st�sy with a mezzaninee but not more�� .�. than tweizty feet. tOrd. 70-32 §155-4, I970) . �i8.36.050 � P_dditiorzzl recruirements. Additional. require- ' ments applic�le to tne C-S zone inc?u�e, but snall. nflt be ' limited to, the following: . � ' ;'- (1) The mini�um four uses reguired for �he i,n.it�al deveZopment in this 2one shall be separate3 by solid wa1�s , and shail have in8ivi.dual �ntrances; . (2) Off-s�raet parking and loar�ing, s�a Chaptez I,8.60 � . �3) Parkin, shall be alZowed in the sefiback ar�� but no closer than si:� fee�t to the pro�erty 3i.:�e on any �ide. On a cor-ner, no' parking sha1l be aZlowed i� the t�-i�ngla �o�aed by the corr_er an� a p�int me�suted twenty feet fs:on the �O�r.er alor.g eacn stree�; . � (�) Acc�ss and eqress required, se� Chapter 18.�a� (5) L�ndscaping rec�uired, twent;� �ercez�t o f �h� t��^z area shall be landscaped and a portion of this shall. be alor_g the. total per�na�.er of the nraper:y. A sight obs�urin� ��1�`� af:�sidentialsza��s shal? be pianted z.Iar�c� az�� s.'�de ��n� Landscapir,g sha1l be main�ained by the p�op�rtv �4jner in a neat and heal�hy condi�ion. In the ezren� such Ia„�c�_ ��., sca�ing is not maintained, the city may cause sur.h mai,nten?r.�� ` . 273 �. ., _ � ;..} ��Y� �, 1+t•�i L 1 ( � ' �� =r��id,�r +� ,��. -��t z ��tUbf x. � ne �' �; x 7 y ' �14`t5 a -t�Y:.� ; '�.�a'�,' , "� j. � ��c � ' . i �,s � a� , � yn:7 ts +S�rr i��y�F �y�.:14� t�n gv�?°��'}�` ~.t� .� f s.� r 3' r :';. w �• 1 •.rdi �f+ 4��f� �d f +r;i� 4��f,7ie�,g M{ a� ��.f 1�'S'� i"v i' _ � ♦ 4 �..:y Y�.`.Y � t Flf . �^�� Cx. �! M1 ` � e� ,� � � � t�,r z , � �,.' L '�• t�q� .i `,� . 7j�ra� 1�.;{a ��,+ ` i ; .j � �:� s-r n�7 . �f f -� . , .:` � _ ♦ _� l . i�< ,-A} 2� uj :. .� ._ �_ �+ � ,iV E � F i . i x- j !' -c�— r, r � i, �� `� ; '��r�.��:'" -i-�-� ,]{dt� � � � a •,� r � � E ` �.... ,i� r � st A`' i� 7� +' f,; t�a' ,� 4., � t� �s:, ' � '� r �e ,hgt t.,, � . : .�i , l fW - �f . 7 � �(� ur * � M Y� � 'IH ; I`�,. � r i n � � lti:`� I .t�� k.• r ..� ' `. � _� � �° � r: , � �r _ ' �•' �r� �}�, � � ' ,� ,�� } I � 't• � ' �JS M �I' �•'�F�� ` i ' ` �� '� � � �f# ,,�a�s �. Tt � r�� I i � �J i' ; �� ,N �,. �� Y A . q ��'a'�� "Ff!'�y'w' >� '�; �R f' .,,�� > ' ��' �+'_ ,+. �w` � � J � cwH! �i'�7 } ,��,�, i' , k 4.:� '' f �' . ., , t ,� , � �«�w�y � , � ' } t `is,.. �...�..t �y*fr• cei't Y�w .i r - � - � � -- �4"'�Fx'�.. i �-� ' '. 'i.`: t�: 1 k � 4. ^ �. �' if'� t� ��°4y* � ti'" %'�t/i_ .� a �{, �i.i. .d �4.. .Y d�. i i� `M �_ �i; 9 L `�`i'�'�: �-�. ,.; ��`� ` i�<=a i �4{,� � k t;. k��a �" ��$ �� +rc sf'�z�'+ � i .� �• r '. Qj: ;:k��1}` ` �..u,3�;. S t� �v�,°a. °.��'��r, � �� ;� }��i� y�3 � �i : � ^'f,��y's; �5' �'�,a s'{3"�'dt � �� 44�M�+{ r r�,i �� 7� . , �4r + �„ �,r��t� � � �` t� ��`�, r 7 0 � � „r � , "tt,� 'i at P �Z•: a 4� � `� F � 5 ty � �. % �Y�.� � '}3'� Y � G �' '�,�r � � � P tdf � ��;^ .. : { 4: t}1,yj 4��L�.¢� }'y�,� < f' �y�'�f�l 4� 7 +� ��a.� �:� n-`l iny .*,.yZ�, '�y,�� `�, S 5, � ,� � ? 'C��'�'�s s ` �.,�,� ' f' ',: � �' ff��'j s 'fi79 ��Fl, � r• �•� � � ... � ��'1 �� . ��Y � �`, 3, ry.. t ,�y " p��' x,.: s p�� v 'R �jt a i �%r� n"r'�J��t 5;S + ,t. y�/ � k� x i, �� <z l �7��' � �'� �; �s. X� r � ,�C � r-� .«� �°'r `�� ' �r � "� t � s � �,}r �'s� , + ;4 ' ' ,r��' � .� f r � t � � ��; t�� € � � � �� , .�r'� t 4 w, " ' v�„,' �� . �'�d�. '�tYy,� t "� �,+ai, � P��ft tri F ;. . . .2— —�--..i � �� 'G: ��' �. (��' � r $�t S i.i� s e �' j-+ ��4 5 • 7��; 4 � .«a e t � } s� , , ' _ : . r'� � �4 4 ` . x r�� - . i x� � �� a xr �`' � � '` � ,�i� , „ '" p ' s� ''u'�, � �` � ¢� t � cN�: . j . . y �4 ';�� ,,. t i ti: ; � � �y g �., y �S� � t� ,.i.� �y x a+ s � y� � A Si*��£�� i � � '•`� � ��, l+±- s �� `�F q ' � 4�,�, 1� i i� a , • �a��% ��a', ,a� 4� � t � . I �q �' �t�� , ; ' `;r � S � r 7 '�r; �L��: �,� ��`?" � }x12:� � f ,�; f { �.tr�'TY -r# / , Q •'1 � , i... � t �� . . � ��'��'�� y . �{,�' ' . . � r ` . . ��.`�.;� �e'�f�{�A .1 c��"�� c .� � i ,r�i�F:. � i t • �, � , � { �'#' � � � �" �'�'"� t *� , '�' 1. r ± • ` �. � C�f� rs�{e� � d �,:��=w �3 � �.�1�.� ��k t� °�� , . i i. ! r F R d�s i �n� S�• � f y ... a 4 � I. i� y, t�. { h `� a"� �i a � i.R'� �" l �'r i d. � �. .�. �" x . � fr'�s �� y, � �*„,�� "��v-��`?,`�"�fi°�`l�„�� a `�!� 'LJy4 z'{�-. �' '' :� ,i"ZfS�? ��rf,. . ��ti.�?i'' �n ,r..��• �'''p f�.. _ E tk� �"' ''T.F� 17,k, ' � ��_��.`�� l.�. .. .. .. . . . . � .,.. .., .. . . . ' . . . . . . . .. � . � . .. � . . . ...... _ .,�,-�-: , .. . x: �' PLANNING CO_MMISSI�N ROLL CALI, ' DA �(ATTE DANCE) DATE � (ATTENDT3 E) DATE �(ATTENDANCE) Frank Tepediho �, � �� i i Glifford Sp�akex � � , i � � Al Popp . i i o . Geraldine Kolleas , / ' i i • � (/ D�uglas Smith . � i i i ,Susan Herron � , t I � " Ri:chard Helz�er e � i o i James Funk i � i Ray Bonn i i � DA �(ATTENDANCE) DATE � (ATTEND CE) ATE �(ATZ'ENDANCE) Frank Tepeda.no � � � p ! i i / i � �.M • Cl.ifford Speaker . � � i i � �-- o _ � � i ybnc�Ic�/1�1'd eK i i i {, ... - C�i•rald'ine' Kolle�s • , r � � i i i Douqlas Smith ' � � � :.. ... . i i i Susan Herron � � � ` i � Rich'ard Helmer � � � . i i i James Funk � � • � ' � i i Rc�y Bonn ^� � ��'"�s � � � � � ! NOTES: ' � � . _ . �;:�;,.�� . . �e �.�. .. � . . .... _. . .... . _. ...... .... .... _ _..... . ._ .. .. . . _ . .:., . .. . .. . . ... .. . . ._:_.,. �„ ,.. ... . . _ ... , ...,,� :.. ..� .......yy ._.. r PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CAT,L . �'" DATE �(A CE) DAT � (ATTENDANCE) DATE �(ATTFNDANCE) k'rank Tepedino � i i � Clifford Speaker � • � i A1 Popp . . � i i Geraldine Kolleas i � ' � Douglas Smi.th � i i i . Susan Hexron � i i � ' Richard Hel�t�.er � _ i i t James Funk ' i i i Roy Bonn i i i DATE �(ATTENDANCE) DAxE � (ATTENDANCE) ATE �(ATTENDANCE) Fxank Tepedino i � � . � � � t ��.. Clifford Speaker ° � � � i � i A1 Popp � � � . ' i � i � Geraldine Kolleas � � � Y i i i � Douglas Smith � � � i � i Susan Herron � � � � i t Rich'ard Helmer � � � ' i � i James Funk � � � � ' i � � Ii�y Bonn � � � � � � ! NOTES: � � • �' , � , . . . �....,,;� _. _ � _ __ ,. _ _ _ . _ _ _ : _ _ . __ ,. f�, � PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL C _ f �` (ATT i , DATE � (ATTENDANCE) DATE �(ATTENDANCE) � Frank Tepedino �L � i i Glifford Speaker �. / i i v i � � �"'�, . � i i Geraldine Kolleas �: i i � � Douglas Smi.th / y— ' � i � � i , � Sus an He rron �-�� I � i i ' Richaxd Helmer i i i � James Funk i i i i Fmy Bonn � i i i , � �^ � i ' E E ENDANC ) DATE (ATTENDANC ) ATE (ATTENDANCE) Frank Tepedino � � . � i i � �_ Cli££ord Speaker � � i i . i �' i i i � � � C�raldine Kolleas � � � � i i D i i — i —-- � i i Susan Herron � � � � � � Rich'ard Helmer � � � � i i t James Funk � � . � ' � � � R�y Bonn i � � � i i � NO-`I'ES: • ' � , . . ';:`� �- — ---- --- - - � / 1 d � � � PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL � ' � - DATE �(ATTEND ) DATE � (ATTENDANCE) DATE 3(ATTENDANCE) � Frank Tepedino ` � i i � Clifford Speaker , � i i ; � '�}"�PP i i � � Geraldine Kol'leas i � ' � i Douglas Smith . !� i � i i . , � Susan Herron � � z � � i � ' �i Richard Helme� �; � � � t� � � James Funk �; � i � Rpy Bonn ' � i �' I` . . {:.:1 ;. 4�: DATE �{ATTENDANCE) DATE � (ATTENDANGE) ATE �(ATTENDANCE) �;i Frarik Tepedino � � • ;`� ' � � �, � �,, CLifford Speaker � � � i . i � ' � � , � � Geraldine Kolleas � � � ? i � � Dou las Sm ith i i i �;' g � i 4' � - Susan Herron � � e � � � �': Rich'ard Helmer � � � ' i i e James Fi.uzk � � . � . � i i r; i�y Bonn � � 1 � � � _ � �, i' � , NOTES: ' � � f . , �; � � s s i �T�. _ , � ,,, � . . . . .,._,. ..-, �.,.....-.: