The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 04/22/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. . : , , . , } . : _ , , . _ . : �` � � AGENDA t � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � April 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. � F�wler Jwnior High - DOUBLE MATH RQOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Ti.gard � � l. Open Meeting: � 2. Roll Call: f 1 3. App•roval of M.inutes from Previous Meeting � � 4. Planning Commission Communication: 5. Public Hearing: A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Te'stimony 1. Proponent's 2. Opponent's 3. Cross-Examination D. Staff Recommendations E. Commission Discussion and Action �w" 5.1 ZONE CHANGE, 7,C 7-SO and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 5-80 (Larry Leahy) NPO #2 5.2 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 9-80 (Park Place Candominiums) NPO #2 5.3 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 10-80 (Summerfield Phase XIV) NPO #6 504 CQNDITIONAL USE, CU 4-80 (The Rok�ert Randall Company) NPO #1 : 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRTCT, ZCYD 6-80 (J. B. Bishop/G. I. Joes) NPO #2 6. Old Busi•ness: 7. New Business: 8. Other Business: 9, Adjournment: �� M�NUTES TIGARD PLANNING CQY+IMTSSION �.pri1 22, lg8o — 7:3a p.m. �� Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10$65 SW�alnu� St, � Ti$ard, aregon Presiden� T�ped3.no �PII�� the meeting, �vhic,h was 8eld in. t.he T.eature ; Room instead of the vouble P4ath Roora a� advert3.Ged� r�t 7:3g, ROLL GAI,L• ', Preaent: Boran;, Funk, Helmer, HeTron, ICoI3.e�zs, Pogp� Smith, 5peaker, Tepedino Agsent; N'one Staff: Howard, and Frank Currie, .�hxlalic Works Di.rector i T:he MINUTES of t.he Apxil i5 m�eting were con�:ider�dP and an a motian duly made �.nd secondad were approved a� submitted. There were �o COMMUNICATToNS vrhich would not be reaci into tk�e record as the meet3.ng ��ogressed. President Tepedino called at�en� tion to t.he copies of ORS 192_.600 pertain3.ng to publ�.c meetin�e whic.h had been �assed out, and of tha s�udy �ession of �tae Com►niseion to be hel,d on Apr�i �9. .After some pre3.lminary announcement� tho President read �Lxe usual notice of authority for ar�.d pracedure to be follo�ed in the msetiaag, s and opened the i'ZTBI.I� HEA�INGS portion of ti�e meeting. ��.. i 5.1 ZONE CHANGE, ZG 7—SO and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 5-8Q '� (I,arry Laahy) N'PO f}2 A request by Larry Leah,y far a Zpne Change fram �Iaehir�gton County RU-4 to City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Zon� D�siguation A-12 '�t�ultifamily�� Zazte r�nd, A reque�,t for a Conditional Use �or �rofeseianal of�ices in arx A-12 "Multa,family�� Zone as allowed �.n the Tigard Munic�.pal Code Section ].8.24.020 both located fronting approximately � 220 fe�et on the east side of Greenburg Rqad and 250 feet ; north af Dakota S�reet (Wash. Co. Tax I�ap 7.S1 3�I3, Taac � Lats 700 and $00). Howard read t.he STAFF REPORT and REGOMMENbATIQIVS. '� The APPLICANT*S Pk2ESENTl1�TON was made by Williadt Baker, pl.aaner �I''� �i.tl� 1�rinkwa�er Enginaering, Inc., y��5 SW Burnh�zn, T�.gard. �3e :had noth�.ng to add to the sta�f r��rt, but o;ff'ered to anawer questions. I Theae was no �JBI,IC T�5. TZ QNY. � COHt��ISSIQ,rN DT�C�, S�IQN AND ACTSaN: Concerns rrere addrea�ed ae �a��.ax�: I �r+►+► H�rxo�x: '�'�� candition r�� 4reen.buz°g ��sa�g �ca�v»�xd explaix�ed � �.he �oac� �,� uncter t:he �urisdictiion a�' the Lounty, �►ha undar. pree�en�C fund;i.�g conclit3.ons would gladly release i� to the Ci�ye . � � � j; �: �;• -- ,,. �::� MINCJTk'�S TTG�1� Pi,ANI�tING C0�1�,5S�ON �,;; April z2, 19$0 �: `,'�;� Page 2 *'�'� Popps Site drainage. Howard stated this r�ould be carefully �onsidered in tY�e Site De�ign Roview proce�� and su��estcad the addi- tion of Recammendation No. 9 as fallows: "That development �rill be sub,ject ta fu1.1, revieur and ap�roval by the Public Works D3.rector f�r site draina�e.�� *• Bonn called attentian to the lack of a bike pa��h along this �rop�.rty, an,d inc�uired whet.her i.t would be installed. Staf£ again called atten�ion to the ettrlier develo ent of arcel,s under Waehin ton P� � K County, wh3.ch d3.d not mandate such amenities, axAd reported t.here i.s rco money �or �ua-h purposes. As to annex�tion, the Boundary Gommisa�.on k►as issued a f'�.nal order for annexati,on. of t.hese parcels to th� City of Ti(;axd' and the procedure �n �he past haa been routiine �nnex�.ti�n by ord3.nance. This on,e ari11 go to tha Couneil with concux�rent zUne r.hangg. Speaker MOVED approval of Zone Chang� ZC 7-80 and Condi�ional ilse Ct7 5-80, basad an Staff Findings and T2ecommendations, plus Recommenda- t�.on N�. 9 vr3.t.h respect to drainag�e, The motion was �econded by Helmer. Funk questiunsd the rationale of Recommendation 2, expl�ined by HowArd. The motiax� then carried unanimously. 5.� ZON� CHA�TG� PI,ANId�IS DEVEY.OPMENT DISTRIC�', �:c�n 9-80 (l�axk Place Condorainiums) NPQ #2 Y•. A r�►quest b� Ja,aeph VanLom for a Zorae Change fr�m R-? '"��n�le �'amily Residentialt� to A-20PD "Mult3.fam3.ly Planned I�ev��:opment Ais'trict" (condomi.nium�j which 3.s in �sep3.ng w3.th the Cornprehensive Plara Designation loaa:ted at ].1900 SW 98th Avenue (Wash. Co. �a�t Map 1S1 35CD, Ta.� Lots 22q0 a.�d 2300). Howard read the STAF�' REP'ORT and RECQMMFNI�ATTONS. He called a�tention to a quest�..on ra3,sed at 'the previoue hearing on this site� whe�.her densi.ty could be increased. A ne�t applicant, h� repoxted, has indeed requested greater density. Joseph VanZom �f The VanLom-Kraxberger Partnars,hip, 4�55 SW ; Scholls Ferry Road, Por�Cland, made the APPLICAN�'PS PRESENTATION. I �ie cal.led attention to tize presence of quite a few saaeable treee on , the pro�erty, v�hich are marked on the p1an. He got clarificatl�n of ;I t.hree minor po3nts in the Conclusionary Findinge and Recommendations, ' ; PUBZ�C TF»5T�MONY in oppoeition was presented by Mike Stan, 11785 ; SW 9,5th Avenue, vrho ovms adjoining I,ot Z100. He ob3ected to the d�nsi�y, �.h� cutt�.n� off of his vier► by this development, and tk�e �.ncreased traffic on 98t.h. zn 12EB�UTTAL Mr. VanLom called ��tention ta the considerable �� _ , _ . ' ;I t�x�cr��,5 TZG,AR}J PLAlVNTNG COI�IISSTON A�r�.l 22, 1.g80 �,. �,a�� improwement occasionod by thic� developmant in g8th. Ho�raxd estimated under norma]. condit3.nns Commerc�.al Street would b� dewel,opec� and 3.mproved wi.thin two yQars, consid.erably improving traffie flow 3.nto t.ha ,heart of tha city from tlie nor�h. COMM�IsSSTO1J DISCUSSTON AND ACTION: Popp expressed concern �or the adeqnacy of the parkizag �rovided� guc�ssing �laere would be more t.Y�an 1.55 C�'s �er unit, which �rould tax parking spacet� fox� Viti�.to�[�a V�nLom agreed it would be des3.rable to .have more parki.n.gy but tha� it came da�tn tc� add3.tion of parki.ng ar eacriYice trees, and thoy opted for �}�e trees in the project design. Howard called attentian to the cr3.�aria �or multiple housing in the city emp.has3.2ed proximity to mass transit, �rit.h discouragement af use of private automobileso The par�Cin� provided is w.ith3.n th� Code requirements. Speaker MOVED approval of Zone Ch�nge Planned nevelopment ZCPD 9-80 at the prel3.minary and general review lavel, baead on Staff Findi.nge and Recommendations, Helmear seconded t.h� raot3.on, wh3ch wae unanimoual.y carried. 5.3 �•ONE CHANGE PLANNED D�VEIA PMENT DISTRICTo ZCPD 10—$0 (Summerfield Pha�e XIV) Ni� #6 �` A request by Raymond Bartel and Tizalat�.n Devel.opment Company for a P1,anning Com�aission. revi�w of Pha$e Fourteen (].4) in Summerfie7.d� Pro;je�ct A — 138 Condomini,um Units, Project B • 11 S�ingle Family Units, and Pro�ect C � fu�ure housing site� located at ].09�h and Sutdmerfield Uri,ve (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 lODD, Tax I�ot 100 and Tax Map 2S1 IOD, Tax Ln�s 1100 artd 200U). Howard xead t.he STAF�' REP(3RT and REC�MMIIIDATIONS„ , T'he APPLICANT�S PRESENTATTON was made by I2aymond. J. Bartel, arc.hi�- tect �nd planner, 2515 SE Harr3.son St., Mil�raukie. He asked for clari� ficr�tion o� several items: as to Condition l, he wondered �.f subsequent developers could be required to pay Yor a share of the Naeve Road improvements made by Tualatin Development Company. Wit.Yl respect to Condition No. 3� ne pointed out that the UniPied Sawerage Agency reaAly controlled the +t3.ming on th3.s. With respect to Cond3.tion 5� ha r►ondered if �°o�ect B, composed Mho11y of single family homes, ehould be sub�ect to S3.te Desi�n Revierr� cantrary to the practi,ce on eingle family► develop— ments. Qn Cpndi.tion 13 .he called attention to the inconsistency in the �� t�.ming of street i.mp.rovements and the recording of t,he final plat. 13a.rtel campred the Sutqmerfi��:d pz°o�ec� as originally �lanned seven years ago and a�built to date. He descri.bod the market aimed at by the �:� ` condomini,um deve].opment �ro�osed. He descri.bed t,he assumptione behind ? �� J y'..,. [:'.;� 1-` �•,,.' �.�� ., �r... .... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . ... . ..... .. ., .�,......� , ri.�.-..:.. . . � .. ..... ... ..... �.i MINU�� mxGA�n pLaxivz�v� cor�lrssrart Agz'il 22 i 1980 �`�,. �'�ge 4 t.he pa�king provided, and the individual unit types �o be 3.ncluded in �he cozadomimium. He revi��►ed t.h� phy�s�.ca,]: characteris�Gias of the �ua.�,d:�:ng and the maaxnex i.n whic.h the l:ar�e exter�.o� surfaces vlj.11 be brok;en up axtd �.ven some c.ha�acter. Ha stated both ,he and Jo.hn Adams of Tualati� Developm.ent Cumpany wauld be available to ansv�er questionsr I'CiBLIC Tk�STIMaNY in oppoc�itian was g�.ven by �ette Peak, 1100Q St� Naeve Street� owner of t�e pa�cel surrounded by this projec�. She objected to � t.hree-story b�tii�ding on the grouzads of los� of view from her one—�tory hous�, wt�ic:h vras bu�.lt vr3.th a vier� orientation, and to apartmAn�s 3.n gPx�exal. She questioned the amount of proparty wh3:ch would be talsen from t�hem fo� road i,�tprovements. G�?pSS-EX.AriiINA2'ION A1VD I2��: Howard raised tt�e discrerancy �or�ed by zone standards for height. The hei�ht of t.ha bu3.ld�.ng proposed wit.h thr�e stories and a flat xoo� i,s les�. than that pe'rm3.ttc�d b,y the Un�.fox°m Builda.ng Codo fa�r a twa—atory buildin�e He eug�ested t.he applicant might come in for a variance. Bartell describeci the elevatiorx of t:he building a.n re�.ation to N�r�s ]?eals�s houseo CQNiMISSION I?ISCU:SI021 A�,IS A.G,�Nt F'unk ques�io�Qd staff as to the handlin.g o� Bartel.'s comments on Candi,tians 1 and 3. Fran'k, Currie �*" describ�d the street 3mproveraent sequired would be pav�m�nt down. the ; �,.. middle of the stree� (3.t �.s no�a a gravelled road) with h�lf—stree� i im�rovements on °�.he dnveloper�s s3.de. Eie fel� this is reasnnabl,e, � sinc� the dev�7.aper is in9.tiating the pro�eat. Smith reaeived Conf�.rma- tion ��am Ha�'�x°d that Px�oject � as ment3.onad in Condition t� should be elir�ina�ed �'rom t,he condition. As to Condit�on 1,3, tihe words ��recordi.ng k of t.he fina�, plat or�� should be deleted. Condition 1.�. was added as ' fallowa: "A set of Qlovatian plan3 shall be submittad s,hawing t.he �par�ment units in r��.ation �o t�,e ad�oining proper�y, .he3.ght to be measured 'by building afficial,. If Code is not met, a varia�nce request sha11 be submitted. to t.he Planning Gotnmission.�� In t:his res�ect ,Smith " aalled a��nnt�,on to the fact t.hat while the develo�r is proposa.ng a � �hrse—story structure, he is design�.ng it ruith the more expensive Slat .� raof to keop doxn thv .heighb, and his proposed hei.�.ht 3.s less than the two—stary heig�.t permitted uz�der the ordinanGe. �� +:f '�.hereupon Smit.'h MOVED ap�rnval of �CPD 10•$0, based on Sta�f Report and Recomm�ndatians w3.th the modif3.ca�3.ons as di,scus�ed to Conditi.ons 1� "',' and 13, plus the additi.on of Condit�on 1�.. Helmer seconded the motion. Punk ra�,sed a question about the timing of t.he eawar� w.hic,h 1s t.he subject j of Condi�ion 3, Hoxard reported USA ia ready to accept t.l�e interceptor , and t.herefore according ta prev3.ous agreemente Tualat3,n Development , Cam�axzy .has one year in whic.h to construct the reg;uired sewer 1.ine. �e felt one mqre con�erence w3.tta TDC and USA pould ��st�rt b:he c�.ock running�� on this issue, The mc�tion �hon carried unan�.mously. � �� '..I i�'� ;,:,;I i;l t;i �' � � � f'- ,. ,:. � r , � . , � MINUTES 'Z'TCaARD PLA,NNINCr GOMMISSION Apri1 22, 1980 ,;;s,, p�� r., The President called for a five—m�nuto recess. Upon reconvening he called for b.xeyity in viaw of the apparent number of peop�o wishin� ta �estify. �e4 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 4-60 (The Rabert Randall Company) NPO �#1 A request b�+ Thomas J. Edmonds for a Conditional Use �.� an M-4 "'xndustr3.a1 �ark" Zone for RV outside storage aa al].awed in the Ti$ard NTunicipal Code ,Secticrn 18.52.020:. Also request�- ing use of floodglain c�rea for RV outside etorage located at $9L10 SW Burnham (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2nB, Ta�c I,oi> 20� and Tax Map 2S1 2,AD, �ax Lot �200). Howard rsad the STAFF REPORT Ald'D RF,�OMMENDATIONS. He alsa read for the record a letter from Paul E. Johnaon, 9300 SYJ Hill Street, c�b�actin� to the propor�al on several counts, includ3.n� uso of floodpl�in, v3,sual and noi.se and a3.r pol.lution, the factor of o�ners� risk in event of flooding, the destruction oF natu�al greenway vogetation aiad i�s �ffect on the wildlife. The APPLICANT�5 PIZsF.S�II`T�'A�TION was mAde by Pau1. Yan� of RobQrt Randnl.l Co., 9,500 S�1 Barbour B�.vd., Portland. He ciQacribed their present � operAtion of mini.—ware.houses, and characterized this additian as a � further r�ndaring of services to t.he publice He revie�red t.he elements i an.d faatures of tha propasal.. With respec� to Condition 5 calling far � .half—street improv�ments� .he �roposed a better solut3.on would be an � LID to construct �he stre��mprovements urithin one year. .If not so undez�taken by that time, they would const.ruct the .tsa1.�-�tr�et �.m�rove— � ments called for. ; P7JBI,IC TEST� IMONY in o�posit3.on, erith ob�ectione presented, was �:I.ven as follows: ' +i�+ C• I2. Saub� 1323Q SYY Burnham Court � usage of �reenwaya 3.mpact on environment and wildlife, air and noiee pollutipn, tho consequent dopraciation o� the market values of ad�acent prapertiesp H� advocated i �Ghe extension of Ash Avenue. , �h�+ Paul �;. Johnaon, 9300 SW H�.1.1 Street � flood�sXai.n and greenway � encroachment with des�ruct�.on of vegetation, vis'ual pollution fox � rasidences on th� other s�.de of Fanno Creek, noise and air pollu�ion; incons�.etency �.n Appl�.cant's argument thi� would take RVs o�'f Tigard °�I streete. ++4 Ronald F. Stark� 93y.0 SW Hill Stireet - agreos witt� other oppanents, but call.od attention to highest use of the facility during I �reatest floodifig per3ods� and whet.her t.he no—risk policy is v3.abl,e o.r prac�ical; raised the quest�,on ae ta .how many of :the vehicles stored �vould actually be t;.hose o� T�.gard res3.dents. � ?� CI�„OSS,�E}CAMINATION AND R�� UT,� TA,L: Mr. Xang stated their more rocent t,;� { ; r k � MZNTJT�S TIGARD PI��NNING CUMMZBSION ! Apr�.1 22� 1980 � ; Pa�e 6 ��. c�l.culat�.c�ns in,d�.�ated a probable maxxmum storago o� 100 uriits. He su�gosted th� greatest number in and aut would occur �.n t.he su�uner month�, and reiterated ttaeir conviction there is a need for this serviceo i Speaker called at�ention t� the indi.cation on the presentation of an addition to t.he:Lr largest building. T.his ia a permitted upe, and ; has �one thraugh Site Design Review, and ta not an i.ssue here. Comm3.s— sioners explarod with Mr. Yang the i�npact of the Staff Recommendation 1 e�.hic,h precluded starage :Ln t.he �.OQ—year floodpla:in. He felt this would reduce etorage capacity �0 50 or fewer Rvs. 1Nhen questioned 3.f they would proceed on t.his� basis, he stated they would have to re�viaw it careful].g for feasib3.l.i�y• M�,ke Davenpox�� 13775 SW As.h Ave., ob�ected on tho basis of hia epeculation as to w.hat would erode fastest in the eve�nt of a flood, and the future requests by the applican� and actions� of the Planning Commis— sion shoulci t.his reque�t bo granted. An unidentified maxa que�s�3.oned the availabili�y o£ flood insurance for the RV owners, anel whet.her a marlsQt survey had beQn mada to determine whet.her RV ovmers would indeed u�e tha faci:Lity, knot�'in� the resk to a su'bstantial personal inve�tmvnt. Yang re�sponded i;hey woul.d l.00k into the fZood inaurance possibility� but poini:ed out t.hey had a �u11-�t3.me managar living on the property, �and �ha� t:he woret possibla situation would be txo fee� o� watex° aver part �f the f�ci].ity and t'hat most af it would not have as mua.h as one foot � of watar in the event of t.he 1.00�-year �lood. E�e s�ated 'their engineers repoxted the eight inches of �ravel etauld improve the resistance to ) erosion. COMM� ISSIOt1 DTSC,�,�QN AND ACTIOI�I: Popp discussed Finding of Fact , No. 6 vthich apparently prohibits outside storage of waste, vehicles, � etc. He felt this was intended to cover t.he type of �tora�e requested by t.he applican�« He queationed the legalit� oY the type oP substitution of �ravel for earth 3.n t,he greenway. He fe�t there ar.e botter areas for RV' stox�age� and �xnressed opposition ta the p�oposal. When asked s if .he wished to mave for der�ial, Popp MOVED denial af CU 4�80 for ; outs3,de storage of re�rea�ion vehiales. The motion was seconded by �{O1.XGASs S�n fu.rther discu�s3on ,5peakex clarif�.ed t.hat the:�,etaff approval ' I perm�.tted storage only outside t.he ].00�yoar floodplain� thus makin� the � ob3ections to su�st3.tution o� gravel for dirt within the floodplairi maot. Funk 3.nquired about t,he action on a boat repair yard in the area. II� Staff reported grc�und .has been brok�n for it� but t.ha� the yard is whally outsi.de t,he floodplain; also �hat other busine�ases had bean allowed outside a�orage. S�aff ex�ressed the concern that if RV storage Fdre allowed in ��e floodp].ain� where xould 100 vehicles be put 3.n t,ho event of a f�,00d? Ho�rard po�.nted out the trade-off in �he s�aff apnroval of greene�ay for paxk� purposes, for outeide storage. Funk favored approval Y.• of the substantial].y reducQd �etorage area, thus leav:ing 1t to the applicant '+ �� tc� determ3.no if it would be px�aGtical on that basis• Sm�.th felt t.he : � r, il � � 'I �, F: ; ' ; . ; � �LINUTES TIGARD PT,AI3NING COb2MISST.ON A.pril 22, ].9$Q ' Page 7 � ��, I outs�.de storage propased is nat compatible w3.t.h t.he propoged use of t.he greent�ay, The mat3.on Yar deni.al t�en aarried, w3.th ��lmer an.d �a.nk vpting no. � 5.5 ��NE CHANGE PLANN�D DEVEIAP'l�E�tT DTN'1?[2ICT, ZCPD 6-80 CJ• Bs Iiisho�/G• I• Joe�s) NPO �1 A request by� J. �. B�.s,hop and FI. J. BucY�holz of Main Street Development, Ltd. for a Zone Chan�e fx�om C�3M ��Maitt Strest a 11/ to C— MPD "Main Stroet Gommercial Planned Develop— Cammer ia 3 m�ent Di�strict�' Zane �or a��roximately 11,5i acres located on the sout.hern enci o� Main Street (Wa�tx. �a. Tax Ma.p 2S1 2AC, Ta�.x I,ots 1600� 1500, 2200, 1t�00, �:34Q, 1200 and a portion of 200 pas°c el #>)• Some add�ti�nal material was di.�tr3.buted to �he Commias3.oners by the ap�ali.cant at t.his time. Staff attem�ted to i�asure t,'hat each Com— missionar :had a copy nf aI.]. the pertinent r�a�erial, some af �vh�.c.h they l�ad had n�o �imQ bo read, T.he Pre�ident expressed concern about thia 1.�c1� a� ta.ma fo�r ad�qua�te preparation for a major decision for the commuzaityo Speaker axpressed hie view of tho impo�tazice of �.ha.s dEC3.eion on t;he long—terra futuxe of t.he downtovv�s Tigard area, and t.he need to • �rovido for��exti�x��inn of strda�s suc.h as Jo.hnson and Ash Av'enua to ��, assure proper circulation• �Towarci read �he STAFF R��(?R,T A1V� RECOMI�S��V'DATIONS� and a twa••pag� s�aff riar�ative relativ4 to this prapo�al.• The APPLICAN';t"S PF2Fw�ITATION was initiata� by S�ephen Janek, attorney for t.t�e ap�licant. He a�ologized far subm3.ttin� addf.t3.onal mater�.al a� the ,heari.ng, statin� that they .had not rece3,ved the Staff I�ecaramendat3.onfs uni;i.l �'riday ufternoon, atxd had 1�.��1�e time to get responses from the Derartmen'� o�' Transporta�ion ana a�hers in re,sponse• T.he Prediden,t callad attention to sevexa7. ].ettsxs handod out at t.he meeting (in orde�r to correcti t.Yae record). Janek assertad t.he issue be�'ore tha Commise3on i� only a Zone change � neces�itated by tho sens�.tive land,� ordinance� (,use of some €looflplai.n�, ; and thmt t.l�e nses are nnt 3.n question. He detailed t:h� k►istory of the project atarting about seven years ago, includ�.ng consider�bian of a civic centerA during whi.ch per�.od the applicants took t:he property off �lae r�arke�. He diacttssed the issues of transpoxtation., as�e��in� the txaxisportation plan embodied in t.he staff�e objecti;on� �o the Pxa�osal have been r.��ected by t,he dec3.sion�makers for t.his axea--N7?0 �`�l. �ho deve�.opQrs .have dt�veloped a plan compl.ying with �,he a.r�opted pol,icies af �,he C�.ty as reflected �.n tha Compre:hensiv`e Plan. Fi'e assr�rted down�own merchants and IIOT ap�rove t.his �ropor�al. Iia pointed out t.t�e con�r�.bu� �{� �ian of greenwa� whi.ch w3.11 be made. Tt was not until October� 1979, �w �:,� ,; �� t�� _,4., . _ , . , Mzrt�rmrs TIGA�D PLAPI�IING COrlMZSSION Apr3.1 22, 3,980 �,,� Page �3 after r�bout a �'ear of ineetings wit.h the City, t.hat t:hey r�ere infoxmed 7?lanni.n� �taff �►ou'!d not ap�rova 3.t unless 1:here was prov3.sion for remli�rnment of Johnson and extens3.on o� As,h. He s�ated th� appli.cant°s aim has been to con�orm �o t.he Comprehensive P1an, �znd that if it does not, in all ro�pnats, t.he Commission Bhould state where �,t does not, He rev�ewed the state••wide �oals whic.h he felt are pertinent here-�-open space and �afe, efficient transportatio�. system. Janek eriticized t.he �lanning D:Lrector and Public 9Yorl�s Director for requiring ex�enaian of Johnson and As'h Streets in �he face of decisions by the City Council ��t:hat t,hat� is not going t�a occur.P' He asserted redesi�n of t;heir prQ�ect to accommodate Jo.hnson Street extension would face reaection by the City Counci.l bacause it conflicts with the adopted ; policies of t'�e Czty Gouncil. As to aontrol of property they do not awn, ,he stated ora1. a�reements .have been reached oa t.he 4Ye�tern Oregon ; Marine, �nd that they are curxen�ly negotiat�,ng A 1eASe with ODOT as distinguished from t.heir declaring i� surpl.u� and offering it for �a�e to t.ha hi�h�s�t bid�ler. Janek commented on the applicant�a controversy t�1.th Staff on the � traff�.c at�dies, axld asked t.he Commi.ssaon to pay caraful attention to t.he traffic studies presented anci the manner in xh�►ch �hey addressed �a�afS�c impaci;s on stroo�s n�her t,haxi Pac�.f3.c �Iighway and Main 5treet. A ,�' i: w_ He revieteed the long history af plans for a civic complex and greenway ,� paz�k� and su�gested t.hat �3.tda suc:h a .history t.here is no �ust3.fi.cation � fc�r d�nial of thls p1a.n. because of � ranerved interest �.n suc.h a comglex• �ie gg�.nted aut �.here is no funding a�:d not.b.in� concrete. He ob�ected i; 1to �he reques� af ;taff to corne baek �vi�1� a revised transportation etudy ; i.nvolrria�g e1Q�aerits wha.c:h are contra.x°y to t.ne adopted city pol.icy. Iie t�en a.ntrod;zcnd Dean Potter, M•A. I� appraise� for pr�sentation of t,he econom3.c as�ects af this dsvelopment on the commun3.ty. �i Pres�!dent �epedina asked Mr. ,Tanek if 3�e felt t.he C1ty Counci.l trould � xule d3.ff�rently from t,ine Staf� Reao�mendat�.ons, and therefore t.he developer� are not eamp7.y3.ng �+r3.th Staff requesta, Janek asserted the "� ad�ov�od Compre.hen�ive ��an, t.he transportion plan anci the NPO �{l plans ' are t.he law to w.hic.h t.hey muet comply; that t�he �Staff ir� teJ.ling them `� to do t.h�,ngs �hat are re�ected in t:he transportation plan particularl.y, and t,herefore Staff�s request�.,ti�ve na foundation �.n t,he �i�y Couac�;l ax in tY�e ex3stiag ado�ated city plans and poliaies. Tn a ��o�t �'urther esxc,han�e Jansk a�serted t.hey by law have to conform to th� Plana, and ;: t�hat is wnat they arQ doin� here. De�n Pottex, rea�. estate a�prai.oer, rganaauver, Was�hington� discu�sed the ��onomic imp�ct of �.h3,s pro�ec� on �i�aard 3,n t.ha l;igh� of the Compre- hc�.r�sive Plan and the NP(3 �#7: plan, Fie dQfi.ned t.lae �oal. oY Maesrs. Bishop ;. arad Buchho�.z a� a �l�n t:ha� wou].d be both profitab7:e and �a beneflt to ` x: �ho cammunity. He aummarized 12 points covered in greater detail in �he �- � z1�•-page �xesenta.�ion submi�ted to �he Commisaioners. ' �: � : i'� . �� ,. �. t, � . .,-._.. .. . �_:- - � �":_�. .. . . .. . . - . . . :_.... I . ;: MINUT�S TI�Al�D PLAITNING COT�IISSION Apr3.1 22, 198a � ." i {� Pa�e 9 a David Keh,le, arch�.tect, 1q32 Fis°st ,Ave., Se�t�l,o, who did the I � arcba.tectural work f'or 4Varemax�t, unsucces�fu�7.y attempted to show some � slides on an overhead projector. �n lieu of this he presented render- � ings ehowing site p].ran, parking, bua.lding configuration and l�ndscaping. He descxibed the princi�al ptaysiGa7. charac�aristics of the pro�ect. He dei:a3.led tk�e plan a.nt�ended to reduce the 3.mpact on Johnson S�reet. Lew�.s Gi.lham of Wil].iams & Gi,lham, architects and �lannerr� for �hc G.T. Joe's, described briefly the physical aharacteri��l:ics of their portion of the project. De�an Hobson., representing CH2M-x�.ii, Portla..�d affice, described their traf:Fic stuaies beginning in May, lq7q. He detailed the base� useci 3.n t.heir studies. He gave the summary of t.heir March, 19�0 report as nresented on page 12 �hereof. �Ye quoted from �. letter datod April 22 from ODOT wherein Wzlliam Ge3.be1� D�.stsict En�ineer states ��... the Highvray Division can �.iVe wi�th the report�s recommend�zti.on from a highway operational standpnint.�� J. B. Bishop of Mainstreet Uevelopment, Ltd., ].050 SN1 Barbour Blvd.a Part].and, tlze px°o�eet develo�er, characterized the submitted pZ�n as tY�e result of 1.6 months of public �.nput and pubJ.ic aotnmen� from the z�eighborhood and the merchants and city staf�. Ho e�pressed � considerable di�appointment that thls was not iche sole �gend� 3.tem, as ho had besn l.ed to betieve, cons3.dering the importance �o and impact on T3.gard. HQ ob�er,ted to the attemp� on the �Sart of P:l.anning Staff to force redesign of bYae�.r praject because of reali�hmen.t of Main Stireet. ;; I3e reported t.hey �i.11 resolutely pu��ue this project to conclusion. Herman J� Buchtzolz, 7�.5� �� xbour, T�.gardf a partner in Main- stroet Develo�mont, Ltdo, intraduced hi.� ma�tzer, �'ranc3.sco Bucl�holz� a limited partne,r, who live� at the .pro�ect site. He comutez�ted that a number of people have been involved in �he develapraen.t of this plan over the past seven years. Mr. �ishap pxesented �z summr�ry of the thrust of �he applicant's �resentat3.ons, ospecia�.�.y �t�3.th respect to the �ransportation plan, vrhich specif:i.ca�ly did not adc3ress the pr�s�ible a.mpACt on �roposal.s for realignment of T�ain Stree�, for whiah there is no �und3.ng, nor basie in ; ths Compr�hensi,ve Plan. P[TBLIC TESTIMOIdY in favar o� the proposal was givexs by •-� +i�Phi1�J�.Benaon, 1o5z9 64t.h Dr�.ve, Portlancl, �n owner of the property adjacent to the oast. He favored the project Yaecau�e of the careful resoarch; it i� compat3.ble vJit.h his o�rn pro�ect for ��empty neaterst� who can �valk to �he pra�ra�ed deve7.ogment. Fi� appos$d a strAet from Main Street through .his development. He asserted putting a street through his project avould cas�t them a lnt o�' sal;es. �Y„, �; k:,; 1=. . � . . . .. j�� , . . . .. _ .... ,. , �..,':. .. .. .. . ... . ..:��.. . I�fINUT�S TIGA�2A PLANNI�TG COtihIISSZON Apz�i1 �2, 19$0 r; Pa�e 10 e` ++�+ �leanor t�uimby, ].1480 SW Fonner Road, comtnended th,e non�strip- devrelopment aspect of this project. She �elt naw is a little lat� �o re�lign �treats-�-3.t was n.ot taken seriously at the formation of Tigaxd and that naw it i� not real.i.stic in �he lig.h�t of c�.tizen�° unwi.l].ingness to apprava money for t.ho city. +�h� George �3urgess, 13475 Sw ��.11age G�.enn D�ive, approved �.he project for the vaxiety it wi.J.l add to shopping faci].it�e�, but �b�ected strenuously to tk�e exten.�ion of A:s.h S�reet, suggesti.ng a bicycl,c�-pec�estrian bridge �ver Fammo Craol� instead a� a vehicle eroesing. +** Me1 Lester, representing A�-Boy Stos°es, a conapetitor of C.I. Joa�s, cormmended t.he latter�s style of opera�3.an an.d the planning wh�.ch has �one i�ta t,he proposed devel.o�ment. +^M�h Jo.hn No1.an, ovmex of t.he prag�erty occupied by A-Boy, favorad the plan and objocted to the proposed realignment of Ma�n atreet' expressin� �he convicta.on t.he Plannin� Staff has made at b3.g ►nistake. **� Craig 4Vest, 94po sw �i�.i st., opposed raali�msnt o:P Ash ,Street a,nd exgressed irrita'tion that the ,S�taff ,aubmits this in tt►e face of reper�ted aubatantia� oppos�tion by t.he c�.tizens in the areao He pointed out t,hs .higheot prior�ty for NPU �l is the rAS3.dsntial � neightior.hond. He cLi.scueaed alternatiaes discussed in the NPO for Ash - Street. �e quotsd the Mayor as s�ying tha proposed civ3.c center i� "a pipo dream�' and :Ls a long, lang wag away, and �hat the transit centar is another mere possibil�tyo �e felt Sta�'f �.s cvorking w�..th some nice ideals tha�t arQ remote contin�enci,ea that are not in touch e►�.th roa].ity--�.he very bad cond�.t�,an af Ash Stree'� and l+rewi.ng. He asserted apeni.ng u� As.h S�rest �vould destroy the value of the .homes of the resid�ntr� of �he ar�a: . � Tt ap�ea�ed �rom t.he te�timony �hat the lar�e audienae was more a.ntPre��ed in oppas:Lng As.h Street than in t:he proposal under considera- e 'th t�er��od to et a c�unt on the two se arate ' �ioaa Comm3.ssion r Sm1 a g P r I 9.�sues. tauite a fQV� �.�a�.�atea ��both." Smith and Te�adino attem�ted to ae�arate t.he issue� and elari��r w�at the Commission could and could not act u��n. After sorae angry exchahges� lncludin� ona addressad to �tae �'resident t:hey Wduld �et him fl.xed, he called for test3,mony in opposition. PUSLIC TESTIkIONY in oppositi,nn vras given by -•. t�h�. R�Saub,=13�30 SiN Burnham Court, Nha apposed t.h� propo,aal as presented and favared Staff6s augges�ions becau�e of �he �xaff�.c ' s3,tuation, � �i�� Paul E. 3ohnson� q30U SW Iii11 St., asked a letter he aubmitted be read i.ntc� �kaQ recardp �►,hich wae done by Haward. �ie oppoees the pro�ect�s encroaclaraent,iia.�he f�.00dplain and ur�ed extension of Ash Avanu�, but deadending 3.t at Frew�ng. He 1];lust�ated hi.s �.dea on the map. 1;�,� , � � _ � ., _ . , . MINU�ES TTGAI2D PLAIINTNG CQMMISSION A,pri1 ?_2, 1.g80 -� Page 11 (;;;' '�a;; ++��h A letter from John A. Butler was read by Howard. Iie opposed t.he deve].opment because of traffic, and advocated exten�i,on of ather �treota into t.he pro�ect. �M+i� After repeated requests by tho Presidemt of a man wha pur�or�ed �o ropre�ant TQO citizens �o fitate �vhether he favo7red ar opposed the propo�al, accompanied at �imes by outbu.rsts frdm the audience, Stephen Fouste f3.nally stated he favored the proposal:. T,he President agreed to let him speak. He presented his pet3.t�on wxth 100 names without de�cribing the petition further. T.ho President then closed the public hearing portion. CRd3SS��7CAMIN�.TION AND R�B^ UTU TAL: S'tephan Janek, representin� the r applicant, appx�ovea the statements m�,d� by Commiss�.aners Smith and Popp abrrut what the issue before the Comm�.�Qion, actuAl,ly i�. He felt t.he lar�er issue of ttzo over—all transportation plan for t.he community and. �:he i�sue af the c�.vic canter is not properly � part of this hearing. He urged a decis3.on on �.he pro�ect alone, apart from t.�e Iarg�r scale coramunity issues. T_he Presiden� thein closed the public hear�.ng on this j.88Ue e COMMISSION DTSCU�SSION_ AI,�,�TA AC� TI(7N: Smi�th rem�.nded th,e audience �hat if t.he pro�ect 3.s approved ns requested, �.here is no assuraalce t.hat Ash S�reet wi.l�. not bo extended at some future�:time••••this is a separa,te e i8sue♦ He in�uired o�f Staff 3.f one of' t,�e bui.l.dings was in the flood� �; plain. Staff replied it was, and on bein� askad, reported 't.he applicant has not �rorkad with Staff on this aspeGt, alt:hou�h a sQns3.tive lands permit request has been submitted. Smith go�t clarification that t.he traff3.c �'lou out oY the com�lex would be eit.her onto Pac3fic Highway or only east on Ma3.n StxQet, He felt, this is a real problem. k'unk, speaking aa a Tigard busine�sman� favored development of t.his area. He will, howevez�, withhold approval until the �ransportation pl.an acoompanyin� t,he development includes a better circulation plan th�t wi11 benefit everyone in Ti�ard. Bonn expressed concern Nrith the estimated peak volura� of $t}0 cax�s pQr hour• Holmer agreed with Funk, adding that as now laid out, it wauld be 3.mpossi.ble to get semi trucks �t.hrough the pro�ect to load and unload. 5peaker expressed complete agreement arith Funk�s positi.on. Herron gat clari�ication of movement of traffic and location of signals on t.he highway, rahereupon ohe agreed �ith, Commissioner Funk�s stand. Ko1].eas chaxacterized prese�t traf£ic as �'atrocious�� and felt the� appl.icant has no� made a suf�icient effort to easa the t�affia they would generate. Tepedi.no a�reed vt3,th co�nen�s already o�fered by ot,her Commiss3or�ers, and ex�ressed es�ecial concern about inaomp�.eto data, or data t,hat arr3.ved at the start of t.he .hoaring. Ho�►ard then reviewod various aspects wh�.ch he felt could r�adil� be z�esolrred, and some diificultiss wit.h t.his presentation. In response to the d�.rectloz� g�.ven the prev3.ous night by the C�.ty Counail, he i.nvited a�.1. �ersons interested in doamtorm �,, �igard tq� meeting to be t�e1d ,Apr�,l 30 �.n this room, � _ _ _ _ _ ' MxrruT�s TTGARD PLANPi1I�iG CONiMZSSIOPT April z2, 198p F'� Page 12 �4.. Smit,h expressed conaiderable concern v�3.th the tra.ffic problem, ' and felt �:ho appl3cant and Staff �rould have to work toge�.her to�►rxrd a solution, He sug�es�ed t;k►1s request may have to 'k,e turned do� ton3ght in orcier to get thi,� process going. Smith then M� �or denial oS ZGPD 6-80, base@ not ar� Staff�s ob�ections, but rather on inadoqua�e des�,gri of access to Hi�hway 99 and the tie—in to M�,in Stree�t, and an � unsett e .. ]. d f7.ond 7.ain eenbelt e t p S r c�u s i o n. T,h e m p t Z O n w a e s e c o n d a d b y Kolleas. Popp spoke in favor of apZaraval w�.th cond3tions calli�g for a re�olution of �.he traf�'3.c probl.enas, Speaker felt tab�izag would be �h� be��ter act�on a� t,his t�,►ne. Afber Yurther discussion of eonsequences and resul�s of dena.al, �he motion for denial. carr3.ed, wi�h Speaker, Pop� and Bonn votirz� no. The Pres�ident �hen aa�ournea t�� maetin� at 12 o�c].ack midnight. r 4 �� 1 � ` ! l _„__ _._ _ ,, :, . _ __ . . ,. ,_ _ , {° }:; �': �;� I;j u; �, SI PUBI,2C NOTICE � 2'IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION �� April 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. �; Fowler Junior High - DOUBLE MATH ROOM �; 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard �; ��!i �,:. Gi 5. Public Hearings ` (; �; 5.1 ZONE CHP.NGE, ZC 7�-80 and CQNDITI�NAL USE, CU 5-80 (Larry Leahy) : NPO #2 " t�; ;; A request by Larry Leahy for a Zone Change from Washington County �a RU-4 to City of Tigard Camprehensive Plan Zone Designation A-12 �k "Multifamily" Zone aa�d, f;'„ A request for a C�nditional Use for professional offices in an A-12 '' °'Multifamily" Zone as allowed in the Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.24.020 �I ,; both locatPd fronting approximately 220 feet on the east side of i; Greenburg Road and 250 feet north of Dakota Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map �� 1S1 358, Tax Lots 700 and 800) . ' ;,,'i 5.2 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 9-80 (Park Place Condominiums) ' NPO #2 ;i?. �"'� ,.: A request by Joseph VanLom for a Zone Change from R-7 "Single Family t-'' Residential°' to A-20E�D "Multifamily Planned Development District° � (condominiums) which is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan Designation 1� �;, located at 11900 SW 98th Avenue (Wash. Co, Tax Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lots ��. 2200 and 2300) . �; 3� 5.3 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 10-80 (Summerfield Phase XIV) �� NPO #6 4;� �:;i ;r:a A request by Raymond Bartel and Tualatin Development Company for a rr f;"�': Planning Commission review of Phase fourteen (14) in Summerfield, ,,;,, Project A -- 138 Condominimum Units, Project B - 11 Single Family Units, �::� and Pr�ject C - future housing site located at 109th and Sum¢nerfield fa Drive (Wash. Co. Tax Map ?Sl lODD, Tax Lot 100 and Tax Map 251 lOD, (?:x Tax Lots 1100 an d 2000) . °' �� 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 4-80 (The Rabert Rand�l.l Company) NPO #1 �`� �r A request by Thomas J. Edmonds fnr a Conditional Use in an M-4 "Zndustrial �;;' Park" Zone for RV outside storage as allowed in the Tigard Municipal �, Code Sectiqn 18.52.02Q. Also requesting use of floodpl.ain area �or r` �� RV outside starage locatecl �at 890� SW Burnham (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 2DB, 4} Tax Lot 200 and Tax hlap 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2200) . ' 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DE`IELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 (J� B. Sishop/G.I. Joes) j NPO #1 �,: �: P:::. A request by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz. of Main 5treet D�velopment, Ltd 7 ,for a Zone Ch.ange from C-3M "Main Straet Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main �, Street Coz�►mercial Planned DeVelopment Distriat" Zone for approximately � 11.51 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax L�i;s 1h00, 15Q0, 2200, 1400, 1,300, 1200 and a portion Y of 200 parce3 #3} , �(�� E� FOR TT APRIL 9 and APRIL 11, 1980 � ; . ,. ,_ � . _ ,. _ ._ _ _ _ ___. _. . `; , , , � . ; - �- �� "PI,F�NNING COyu^2ISSION SIGPZ—UP SHE�'T" � t. .�. . ;! � NOTICE: ALL PFRSQVS DESIP.ING TO SPEI-li: ON ANY ITEbi MUST SIGN TI-EEIR DTAI�IE ON THE t APPROPRI�ITE SIGN—UP SI3EET(S) , LOCATED AT TEIE BACIC 0� TK� E200M. PEP.SONS DE52RIP1G 1'O 5PEAK W1LL THEN BE CAT,LED FOR[4�1I2D BX THE CHATR TO SPEAK Ori INDICATED ITEM(5) . e%/`'il�,►/ . !I� 1, �� FIGENDI ITEM: �� REFERENC ' �� DAT�: �� ,; , ;-. N�NIE �v �ADDRE� �i � � � F'� il ,� �� I � r,� �;� � C°: s� � � � � �� A,GENDA ITEM; ,J e � REFER�NCE: s:%�/ / �—�AATE: y� � �� NAbiE ADDRE S S " �,. %/� 5 ��' �.s'��`-� P �,� /�'r � �' , ,!�'�/fv��?, �T�' - �l � . �/� �S C�, ��/ /�`'/�'LS i�1 Y r�a �, , �' ,��- �� h. d� � - d'/2 5� S�� v'��ic/��r'��.� I�: -, �,:', . �`; �(� �> #1(' e.; i /— �r��A� �?� U/� AGENUA ITEM: � � REFERENCE:"L-v�"�°�(/�'' �'�/ DATE: ��/L—�y�� t`� �7I�--• r,� ��:: NAME ADDRE S S {�; �� Gv ��v o e �.- ^ �.y ��,��.�..�% �a � /' - _� � �� -- ' - -��a-�fL-,-- �._..._—,,�-,L-�.s?�z--�-(,�2.1-f.- _ .� . � .._.___ ��r � -�— — ._ ��?.. �, �� -- -- � �; � .. . .�.__. _�_. . . . �3; � �� i . ., _. . ... .... . ..... . .,..�. ..� .. , .,.. ,_ � .,�,:,.. ...,,_ _,.,�.,r�:, ._h„ ..:.. .... . . . �.. . ..: �. . . . .;, .. . _. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . ....._, I ` ` � .. 1 . ' r t � 'j `i � "PI�FIIJNING COi�li�iISSION SIGi�1-C7P SHEET" � � .�. ;; �. NOTICE: AI,L PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON �LNY ITEM r1UST SIGN THEIP, DIAb1E ON THF I r APPFOPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF' THE ROOM. PERSON5 '' b.ESIF.ING TO SPEAK WIL,L THEN BE C��,LED��'�HAIR TO SPEAK ON rtJD2CATED ITEM(S) . /�� '` / " // �j � AGENDA ITENI: � ( REFEREI�TCE: �(/ ��l � I�ATF: � �'� � � ADDRE5S � �C f .-�-�°,£-� �(..J l///�l/_'G %�'_ 1�.��1C�� . �j, . J ,------_ , `.� c � .� �' � a � . . � � � � / S �-ti�. ,�-� G � . U Ci�—� �a111 �� t� " �/�'�s' �S �.G�. �j � � .��L� , - ��z,K.� l 3/z-� 5�� s l� ��c.. % ��,�� .�_ _ , �. ,� s� s . w. ��.b�. �,�-r � .-�------ , _ _ � AGEhTDA ITEM: � � E E v ''� �) � R N CP O " DATE; � � i!I, •r � ` `� � v�� `� ��• �� ADDP,ESS }I � � f''I, �� , L i � �-� �/ � � �� "' � �� /�� itl, .�/C-�-e �� %DO �� i o�� ' ' ` �I � � « �- -;,-� � � � �.,�'� ��7�.�,��,, ��„-� � �- 2 ,,� �"I >. ,�� ""' �%''��r''`r""' � �' � J� r ,��, i �� / ,/ , .� / -� �� G;1 �i�,s ,, �� -�- �.t,r�/1'L��4.a�� /�D'u ��,2Z%�� `ii �_, ��:xFmc�: ,e�:-_ ;�I .5 U 11 M I CJ/�}f-„' .L�G �- .� S.f I�� f s' S % �'�d/� T/,A.,v d �; NAN1E ADDP.E S S 1:i �,. �i� .. .'�"''� /32CS"S.�t1 � �r..�.. '� �; r-- �-�--- ; --�'�!-��..---��".� �____1.��I-�.�".�_..�._��--�4-�-�----�:��__. � � s,�._, /�z�i o s c� �-S ��.a� �; i� � � ` �!'' _ fil �yl i!` li' �ii p 4� ... . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .....� ,;_ .'i �v^,:�.�.� . . .. . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . .. . . � . . � .. .. . . . ..'�:... . . . . . .. � PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL , �:. DA �(ATTE DANCE) DATE � (ATTENDANCE) DA'PE �(AT7IENDA.NCE) Fxank Tepedino �, � . i � C�.if ford Speake r i � � � At Popp . . i � � , Geral.dine Kolleas i i � t Douglas Smith ' . � � i � Susan Herran � . � • � . Richard Helmer . i s � James Funk i � � 13Ay Bonn s i � . ` , DATE �(ATTENDANCE) DAT� � (ATTENDANCE) ATE �(ATTENDANCE) iFrank Tepedino � � . � �l- � � � �°" Clifford Speaker � � � � . � Al.Popp � � � • � � ' ' 1 Geraldine Kolleas � � � ' � � � 1 . Douglas Smith � � � � t i i Susan Hexron � � s � � � Rich'axd Helmer � � � � � � t James Funk � � . � • i i i I�y Bonn � � ` e . s � NOTES: • ' �::; , I , . �.�. _ . . .. � _ ; �. -r STTIFE' REPORT �, , AGEND.A 5.1 TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION April 22, 1980 - 7;30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - DOUBLF MATH ROOM 10865 SW Walnut St., Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHAIJGE, ZC 7-80 and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 5-80 (Larry Leahy) APPLICANT: Larry Leahy OWNER: Edward and Donna Heintz Drinkwater Engineering, Inc. 11070 SW Greenburg Rd. 9205 SW Burnham T�.gard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 9722,3 AND John and Mary McMurtrie Rt. 3, Box 116-E Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 APFLICATIQN DATE: March 27, 1980 S2TE LOCATION: East side of Greenburg Road, 250' north of SW N. Dakota (Wash. Co. Tax Map 151 35B, Tax Lots 700 and 800} . REQUEST: For a Zone Change from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard A-12 "Multifamily" and a Conditional Use request for professional �,,,,. offices in the A-12 Zone. (Section 18.24.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code) This zone is specified on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. PREVIOUS ACTION: Property recently annexed to the City, (Boundary Commission #153�. Tigard has nat formally approved this annexation by ordinance. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This zane change is in conformance with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conditional Use for professional offices is appropriate under Section 18.24.020 of the Code, II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: i 1. Greenburg Road is in substandard condition. 2. The proposed use of this land is compatible with surrounding development. 3. The City does not now control. the Greenburg right-of-way fronting these properties. All work in the public righ�-of-way wi11 be th�ough Washington County and Tigard's Public Works Director. �;. . _ . ... s """-.,;�,�,�..�,w,..,.._ _. , , , i 1 STAFF REPORT �^, AGENDA 5.1 ZC 7-80/CU 5-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 2 III. ST74FF RECOMNNI�33NDATION: � Staff recommends approval of the Zone Change and Conditional Use with the � following conditions: � l. All development on either parcel shall be subject to Site Design Review. � 2. If these properties are to develop together, it may be necessary to combine k the lots to satisfy the Building Departrnent requirements prior to issuance � of a Building Permit. 6 I t 3• Gradinq plans 3nd construction plans on a11 public right-o£-ways shall be submztted � and a�proved by the Public Works Director prior to commeneement af work. ' i � 4• Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this F site prinr to the issuance af a Building Permit. � N 5• All existing or prop�sed t.itilities shall be placed undergraund. Street 1 lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director, � 6. No Building Permit shall .L-e issu�d antil the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of �pprova7.. �• Improvements may be bonded prior. to issuance of 8uilding Permits. �• That street improvements be constructed to the approval of �he Public 4�Iorks � Director prior ta the recordin,y o;f the final P2at or issuance af a Bui�:ding Permit. � � 6 Prepared b o , Planning Di,rector AHvmc �. �,,.,._,_, .,G:,..... _ _ . � � � . . �.... .... . .. . v , ... . .... . . . ... � ; . ....._...,. . . .. . . r.:. ` � . .. .. . . _. _ .... .. ... .._ .. ... +:r �I '\ . s' „ • . . , \ ' n .. ' C � � i' . •. . '. .. . ry/ . - . . � �l , ��\. . ` ` .. ) F� � . � l.. w .. �. � . , + , t � a � Y '� . ' � � ✓ �°r:• ' .� e V �,�:,� � " , . .. t � � S190 ti.." K , " \��/:�. u. , 7. � ' �- . , , , . s'S ' , ��. � C.�.r730� � Q � . ..r: . ;� � � . 9 .. .�., f . �` '��.y�_r. �L. . � „v l � . SEE MAP 1 S I 35BA ' � w -� �` � � ,, Y� N �, o ; � �.. �•my � _, _ . .'�� ' :. . . � �.. � , ..- r - . } ' N ,� � n. • � �1r \� ` ,. ��, �" Y �Z h, . . ' n • � , ,r�, '�esax °� ,�# , .� � � � ��,. ;. J 'a ,;,,/ i �� i' o � � • � - k ��FR'�3521-00P.0:T.� ��K�g/,o �` /+ � ' � � �'' u� , t � QT u � � ' ,'� i'� �� 'W , . _ . � ? 0�� t v`hi N t"��" E� s �' 3 N89°a9W 1766Chs.. � ,j,�\ . ^ '��'� / � � ,�- '� ' � e2oo r , . � ,:� �� . . � :,•. �� % �:�:�r� , . �x � ( . . a c. � �. i ,,:; `'s, " ,c �) `�' � �� , ,� 5.56 'J. \\ � Y. �.,: t 1 „ . . � ; •^ _ � ' - . �;'�' .;:. � � t �m t � � , \��Z . . ! / F } , N IM . y . 2� �� .\ +?yQaPS� � • 4 R � �'� a .V . .i' i.'' �_� \ ��/ . .. . .. , �a,� , :.o rv (N `� ''� i ij ' ��, �:s {303 ;<� �- °a , ,• � ��do' • i •�a�e , •' N N I. o , . . � C.S. .I3017 '' ,.45,Qc, � �' ',� � � , ° Y.� � _'� �', ° �' , � o �oz�.e'' 3 -� / � �� . 'w'. . N�B 49 � ./ � ,;y, ._.__�-------_ 19 p ��9.' �— ° -,-� � ,re._ '; 665 53 r e!_ , f• / 35'8,8 T � ' __,. .. . ; �' ; � � � s.. 3843, -- . , , � , �I�i041' ` ; . � n 9- rv,�W 1�,04 . ... ' ,G,S.13,905 �: `S4(��j Ig , �.�' � ,y �^-� 1 '2.25Ac., , � .� -„ m 1� . . �2 -:a i`d' 0 2.41 At. .:. 1306 , r�°r 1300 s>o/o�! �:�yn,/� /�"V 20G ys, � 20��° ; '�Q, � ! •'•o �I � � I'•w _ �4.� AC.. �;.59Ac. 542 �C / . .44AL v+ `� m :; N � N 74�51' ' ' \ `,� r 2�y�,A� i.+� � ��. ` z ' I n, � � ' - ,� 2. �rys o . / • �o � �C.S. No. 132•� � e� ' 130��' " _. . 1500 ':,:iyo'�r ` •�- _ — " isa �._... . °� � .o�� . ;Il,n 9 if � ..0.1 AC.�40A •�:,/�LIG`�3 (J�� .,lp� !� ��^^' 9O ' � 1�`ry .l NAC. T ► 1146 _ �� _ L. '^� �a�'�r , � 'a N_- �r ' ioo '� I IOO 2O2 ;.. ��,� `� �o`�i� , � - C.S. 5402 r . _ _ - �Ns 23rs3 • 0/�� ' Se�.2a' see°a�E ` �� .2�.4: ._, • '�� 203 Q46Ac. /.GIBAc. ,. � , ' -, ' , . . . 9�oy.� 2 � �J �4d�. ./sAc. I �� `��; r(i�,n \ , , � ��0 Z ( � '�.93' 97.9� 6_y ` aKti tq o?O,W 100 o r ' � , ti �: Fr60-+� 2$7�C. , � 'f ... . . N__ . � +'� � ' ••,..,, . � � .. � �\�v�w Q1 �, .•�� ': ,, , ; ' .+� � C.S 7[309� �G�. r � L21 Ac � , :, �i��1613 � `in 4.B3 Ac. ., � •N , , I ;. � � ''; , . ' ' s io � +A o • . , . . M� _ � I . . , ' v � , , � - 201 ' , Q \ ,°r. • �° ' � . , " ' (�k � _ =?.Z2 Ac. C 13,9t�i 'A �I �� ,� 354,5 _�T\ e l_ �,� °.. � e 77 S6� I ^,.-� V / ,e `3 6 _r. .�r . . o � '� ' �q r 5 69°32�.�_ � � • ; r � �� . ' ' � ^ '. � � ra' . �j�0 • ,a i. � `•��,�f °,� � `J �m�� i �, i �Q , '/ h� • Z.BB Ac, ;a � � ; . .�. � . . b Ac '.' �aa''�J; 'O�e.ti� . � . �, '•'�. x .. i. / }� �, ! �- - \' '' /.39 t . $ � � - (�� I G . �'' • � �• " . I `' .*' �, � . r N SIV�I�7LJ� ��m ] , 1 .A/ .� , f' _.,1_ � ( F�~ \ ' N 2 59 �3{V�1 ..._. ' . �! *�7 l'� `'��`�' ' 1'' � er4 ' . � ��..�. , �71� � A• , ' '�;. 1�.. .'�• * �� o � 1 `,� �� o .-,.,' y � � \\ .t;�589'D2 Ec L2.44 • �-,.^"' ,� � ..0 �NW • . ,� i `�,;a :i� ^ �• � � .. —— — �•a'! �� . ' .. � i' n_... :336.3G � ' ' � �35 E'U� . ` °i= ��j� �, . � `� .ZZ�e, . ,�'�°\S " �,� � 2.2.5 AC � , i, ' �Q�.'C� '�, � �.c. , . ,B,i . . �`y SI600. �' .° ; h' °5 hu ►�`�G6`, . t� f,,.•SE . MAP i 1 � � ` ` tt Ra� �.7sAc. �. � � - ��.�. � ?� ' �a:. •ti,l :: � „ .... � �,i ; ..` �_ ,..L,, , .,t r>. ''� . ;; J��r''�'°` ��t' �� , ..,.I � .i `. . -. . . � � �.I k .. � � . . .,- ^ � ,: � . r, .. �� C,.S. �44�.5 �� • • � �'P,��O ��a�� 1�, Sl'`�� ,, �1 , . . ,, e-, L• �• ✓� �' ` `��I � l F� r .. ' qti,'� ` . . C.S, 1417°.. � �177 8 'a .a 1T,+. •�' r � , t 1ti . ' (... . '•;", '9r' � ,'� l,. "`' , ' ��+ .r ". ` ,�P � n�.'� � J•)� r' �3}•n �� 1 •, .. �Q O � � I . ' \�C,��t�� / In . . . : �F°�i' � . \ U ` ,� ' � ~�� •i. �I v ` . � . . � , ^ I. } ' o` � � �h. . ' , . . , . . . � - � ?. , \ 'qUb C �d��L�'�P�p�' �� • ey9 �O.ra1•�. ' ' . . � � , . '1'�'~� - �Pa\04 . ��. (N �� 'yO�GPp . .; �/ -!7 . q`� . r t� , }', t r. �1_'�_5slts?o6` _'3a \ � +' � _33a"�6'w '�31-,y 4 '��''`(�,�'�A�y1 AI• JO F1 11NE�DAVID tiR�MAM `Di. No�.' Wr�� +DAKOT�t'•'+"°al'R o y � '^..�. �... _: , _ �� Et.�°': b f �n4T oLID:E ,,�,Nr. L ��GrLIiV -wL� N?,b, s -��"'4J ♦� � . . . / a ' ' c -.n �t k.r.. r� �Sr: sr✓ � � g - sr �> �rx ° , t� i`�t�4r'. '�+,-'„-, � al� . .�+• r -r^ t.,:.K7� t'� ,`it t ,'i,ye�w/C��;+i!� � C��tf+°" � �•:`'A� �� .� <<. �~ y �.+,i�S .1�i.t�s.i.� Y R''�,�X +�ft;��'. . ,� .h � �^�.F��. 9'Z.'k��.8 �'1�'1 4�� °"�� . :4.°'� �v. .��c t �p' �•.�.�.� t ,�'�.� .�'y'�'H"n ��`.r.c;t#��y k:��,-�z �.3�� t"`�. . '+ r ,,,I w� � •�,S }..' a fi :3i 1 �3'� }. } r �� .�.i-M lw�� T 4�.` i 1'y^.-j {'�.< �1� :'-� ,,� ' t. ,� �"�i� ,r� v �� i ' , 9 .,/f r `��dd'e � � �4 J� ;� '+! r J}tzr�?,x � �u &- s '� � aJ� .�,T tiy rirS 1? ti� ::id+ �.�n � r»4 x e -• iy'1'-a #."K'g ',y SZ. "��[ , 7.'n 4 t" -,�r r• 1*! 1 �-+�' �. .�'tn � �`; � �..,�',r }'�...l�J.1 ' 35C 4 �1�Y0 . �t A�L N � 4��5 ! K `�h y t I " Y�w.lt7' 'l . S . � d . f k . k ,`��,� f �I 1�y�: ti.�• "} f '� ( 'V�,n i J J y I . "1 7 F:�'�"F� ii�'v �.* I y�i ` q 3. Y'�� I /I 1 y; t -1+ k ,h :, � �, 3 -� 7 tta-:�.w s�. mr �v: .��S�� .,� 4i �y Aa.J;y�cy.Yx� �.d y yf .t� d i - �.. y �.:. N�nr 1 � �t L T�+J�< � .u� �;�. `� �� <�� }� iXzw��+�'vF��'N{sj.�`. 6...�{aC.�+i4�ir.�+h�rri''y YYr+�G`:��M..�}f'fvt� �ty, . ,rf' � ,C+ a. , , %v �' '� .r{�"'�r Hva��:.�SJ;nf.4:�.°w'f''"cx rbsrji-„r�A .� �,:V tKV,+Jw. r �, 3 i.->. a . �.... .. _ ;_ t , _�� :��..�.Il:� _ E_� ,_ , r��TI T. .. ... . : � � M c y ..�. r �. ` _ s. \ L.A; � " ; _.—.—:__ �_.� �_=��;�ft-,', , �" [ \ W 3 f�lt 90110ENf � � ! {aru.. <! tr.`\ . f . J � ;�a f��. : �... . � 1 •, t.�..J�Y 4,e��1 .� ' -t=1 �� _'� � . +• .. � �tMA� �i ''•� �'� ` . _ 1lf�s � arn . . sr �!.�:� .. •' � 1! -f. .?Z_ �i 6w taN[y _ st w sl f �� i as�e �i� � � ._'� �s� sr '.'-- �.�o�Y_._.i:� ]�;' ° g 4E�„a 6 "� .i� �.oco�o =� �' �r. 0 _� .�-: si' \. Slll• i�� . .��.! � F � ��iOW57 � � tl: W I '. daJ - ' � � \ ar ` �°o� ' r,e'+ � wu�c e�r �-'- �__ -,��- � C« -.7 f r. �t r�r�ct sr �_�, ��1�� "-' — ' � ''� � \ +Y R 4 • �� _��.1 . ��.• .L.. � �• __ .��. :.... � .. i m ° � a . c. aK er. � '� t'v��' l V�[ i� �� sr. r � . $ d � � y•� � .at .♦ � . . E, �i� � R � .�,�� y L.. < �+ � 'I "bC ,F. � C r ,,.�, , ��_: �• " '� ' '�,..�.». id a H `'. ' � Me i�'�': r 3 ,; , � , � .. s J r . =�ac�: ��C � '� ' l'�; a �anaw.m� �.� T ..o s� '� °y � . --� -�`S�u��_�;�'-' sT � . ;' E .��i. ` f.r. . M[ - �•'' -� i k�r ' . �� . ir.��' = . , H� w ANiANIT� � . � A � LO StAff� T.. �. 'rN01M1'{T. � ��. � � �W W � � • �-^'�' �t. � Y Li_ W S ll i -J' (PYA � �l1tYE ST T s4.� � * � g� . �j�� !\c �� h. NORTN �K � �� +�' n'� i,�.. _�__ . 5 M_ NOR.T �041(OYA_� _S�� r � g ~ t. � � — ... �� &��a1nLNE1B,y ..� '�(' y I"'��, 217 l� �� . � '� p�t�'. I sy fUYYE4. � � =� . ': `I� . ii w 'F1 .� ► . 0. S W. _ '.Era.� • _ .[ w ��f ' W � M ,�b JU?. �p. ST. �. 1 ; 1 E �� ' Sd. . t ' J '$.�� q i �t .. x� / ,:♦. M !. � . T�lt v Vf�sFi ST. � ��: ) j 1 f f y�''F..CREST � �OF�VE . y.� f.lf. 7!'� 0 f > E f f . r' t. . m � W � G / �� ' �r[Mf O�!' Q ,> W S. d' �j.• � 7 Tj S • a� � � r�- !►�f` _��Si . �• .� . >_ �� `(I . 7� �. Slf � � � � C r 'LCrIS „ S�!L 4 /LQ / '! � �j1uQ AI' . LY. d� P ,: f1I .�L.. ` }�I : SW. N31lTMER �� -�i .MEIDOW i S� 741GE1►� y �� OUVALI {T. � ~t� E 13��n � � c \ . Ct � .. � � ,r .��; : s�a li alI ,� Sr M E � [M F( ER:ME ' w 3 r t �1 � !� f1.�»--°-- � e . � � t euxTe • �u. n�ry111 � ''N,�� r C�� '�\� �f�"`��_ r�A .CiT y � �'� � P�� Q �..){ �`� . � 1, i . . � yn�?�� SW� lY 5. �� t�� . �{ lf. 't'� �i St JU � '� '� � -�'�i n. �! ',��t�,7..,,�»�t 04�o s r ��!,t l` � 04ei�` i y� r w � ^.�S.R IliNtl( t � SIY.ANN SL . - ,MaIMUY �Di A� CL '4 C . � 'CM � L�ti. .s' �r�... r � �'' � 'w ~ �j�(�cTMl�� c�� =� 3 t� � M ,..� t��c S� S'� o �'4 �3 ,�� ;� � 1 .J . ttuw�. � ti fL•.4�.:*VE- S j � ; �� ) \°1. �1P � � i,` r;.+ �1 �i�'� � i N . � f,�, � � �_< _ �`� y '.1. , a+ � .� __ re� �Wrc�o •. � :r �!'�� ' C------�_�_._ � � , � � i; �! S • r� � �' °o1Q � aa N .(t SXC 'E/1ROL �F: # � 5. Q� M Y°�' M. UNIt�►�'_ " ' P !,� �� 4 P ,.S V . � � .�9. rr . ' g -�' , , � ' �.-� � � ' M i ; C ' 4'L :l" p�r � •$ �< .�, / � ST ST. j !.R � � '.�d� Ll. � sJ o 6_Jk \ �r ; . ? �� ' � '�t . ' tAPYEN 4T. i.MF. M1 � ie . �L .h�+ �� . ti# � ^ Ser.� .. H q -I i � �.. lW. IL�ERT� JT. . ..S�l. � �i 99 . yQ'f ' � �{.i � � s �• y ; '�TtWi g � W S�g , ��0 �' � HaN►70k� e..��, T�/ ��S:�Y fONNE a - �1# �� y►�N�' � � ♦� .6L / J' n ��/ ST. W ( �� 4t . :/.� . 11 N`` w. a�res 110. , ER7�Y on z Q.�a '� "+` � � ► 1I �? a d �; \\ �j � Y 3�. ' � t ; �, J � MS♦� u . ` ��` �� 3 S.Y/. W 1 pi 3 �./ '!�' �Y . i., w ��. S1Y.�� PM' � 9 � g�' ..� ��. Sf►. v Nf y)� .�/ � /.�.. � . � li. —^� L14 fi O f � : ;. . . "NO � a � { �" 6 • sx. �1 .' 6*t 4 / L�." � cooN � . � �� p � t ,�� Q f }'j: J �+ .g, ! / �� ♦ +^ .r.w r -�� N.. �r. _: ( 5� w' o +� s�� sc // _ ir. .I�MIIW � � f4.� i pi ! aiS-F� tl�. :.. � 'o,,'ti a�� ST_ ►+��. O . . � > ' � ' . �`w Y " Q� �F[� � �f;. S.M. OMI1 _ w�1_w� /�1.1181�M�. . -' 1.M � G�• .� � 3 � �`� �M . � . _ 1� �p.. ,*� � � t iRNHW[Y YI� �� ?YI.. �, SN � . , [OaEwJOD 11T. %• CHEA•AY � [�.�E trr ((''��''�� c � � � 'b =:: . �r.°� ♦ . _' . s ^i s �'�/ } i6MN . � `�. � M�f.LV1ER �T f � / 1�1 S�MOBUQ � � •' �� M/+ow�� ru . � � f�.1t. � l_1.� �1� ii ;+� y�f1 � �RU[�� PAIIN � 3. �"1 "f.o > y�� llll lE�' CT: ^/ � �`,� L" , . � d� �� .. - � °j McflMAla � !� ' �w . \^ [� ^ , � oa�• ; _ ~ ar' m 8��' �- `, . S „ � « r s;; M S ; --"' '�' e�se �� i�l CL � �`. � u . �� . � � , - r.3. 0 f � . . � � fN p fk ..�4N��' � . . . . _ . . j � 6r = � j M.aM�lE11 > > � .�"' � i s �� . ..rw).r� .� � sw .:!'1'` .._ J ..t t t..r e►c� � w�t.�ono nr ? y"I�I�fI�.. - +I,r � . . . . � . . � . . . � . � � - %:�:•" . � . . . - ' _ . .. . .. � t . � . _ . . . . � � � ',,�.` � �_ � � � � . ..._ �.. . -.. . - ":_ .. � . � . ' . � �.�_ . �,�-;., STAE'F 12EPORT AGENDA 5.2 �'' TIGARn PLANNING COMMISSION April 2?, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - DOUBLE MATFI ROOM 10865 SW Walnut S�treet, Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMEI�T, ZCPD 9-80 (Park Place Condominiums) APPLICANT: Joseph M. Van Lom OWNER: CENTCTRY 21 HOMES The Van Lom-Kraxberger Partnership 7412 SW Beaverton-Iilsdale Hwy. 4455 SW Scholls Ferry Road Portland, Oregon 97225 Por�tlanc3, Oregon 97225 APP L:L CATT ON DATE: March 27, 1980 STZ� LOCATI�N: ]1900 5W 98th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300) REQUEST: Zone Change from R-7 "Sinc�le Family Residential" to A-20PD "Multifamily Planned Development District" (condominiumsa which is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan Designation �or this property. �''' (Staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider this application as a Preliminary and General lteview beca�xse it is a re-application for this property, and anly the layout configurations and density increase request are faetors which have changed since your last review.) PREVIOUS ACTION: pn ,7une 5, 1979. zigard Planning Commission approved a Preliminary Plan and Program Review for this parcel. Referenae Zone Change Plannsd Development District, ZCPD 21-79. Property has changed hands. No action was taken on ZC 21-79 In May 1979, an application was made for a Conditional Clse (reference CU 8-79) to construct duplexes on this parcel, but 'the application was withdrawn before any action was made. i. rzra�zNC� or r�cl; 1. The site is designated "Multifamily Residential" (Condominium style) permitting twenty (20) dwelling units per gross acre on the NPO #2 Plan as amended by the Tigard City Council on May 21, 1979. 2. The applicant proposes to develop a 54 unit towrxhouse-condominimum style on � �` a 3.75 acre parcel. � +�' � C s ► E � � >. , „ �. . � � , STAFF REPORT �� TIGARD. PLANNING COMMISSION �. May 20, 1980 7CPD 9-80 Page 2 3. Section 18.56.110 of the Tigard Municipal Code provides the density factor calculation as follows: Gross acreage site: 3.75 Minus public improvement 20� Buildable net acres: 3.00 'IB�e applicant is eighteen (18) units below the maximum allowable dwelling units permitted in this zone. 4. Applicable policies of the Comprehensive P1an for development in the NPO #2 area: Public improvements: Policies 9 and 10 - page 17 Planned Unit Developments: Policy 11 - page 17 Site and Open Space Improvements: Policies 12 and 13 - page 17 Location of High Density Residences: Policy 16 - page 19 5. The site has two single family units with a heavy concentration of trees throughout the site. The topography slopes gentle from the north to south �- and has a minor wet �.ands area on its south end. 6. The surrounding land uses are single family with vacant �nd open space parcels on all sides. The Comprehensive P1ari designates the properties to the west of the subject site as multifamily. To the south is the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. South of the tracks is an industrial area. The areas north and east are designated "Single Family Residential". The area adjacent south of the subject site was also designated as °'Multifamily Reside�htial" twenty (20) dwelling units per gross acre (condominimum-style) . 7. Traffic to and from the site wi11 be served by SW 98th and a future extension of SW Commercial Street from the southeast. SW 98th is a City street with approximately sixteen (16') feet of paving in good condition. However, there are no curbs or sidewalks. SW Commercial will be created from the inter- section of SW 95th Avenue west to SW 98th when the property adjacent south of the subject site is developed. The Comprehensive Plan designates SW 98th as a 1oca1 street having fifty (50') feet of right-of-way and SW Commercial Street as a collector street with sixty (60' ) feet of right-of-way. SW 98th presently has thirty (30° ) feet of right-of-way. 8. Sewer and water is presently on site with ample capacity for the proposed forty (40) dwelling uni�s. 9. Parcel contains a small amount of drainage area towards the railroad tracks in the pxoposed Commercial Street construction location. I �- � � �- � . �. _ _ �;.. STAFF REPORT },V' TIGARD PZANNING COMMTSSION May 20, 1980 ZCPD �-80 Page 3 2I. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1, SW 98th is presently in s�bstandard condition to manage the increase traffic. Therefore, ten (10' ) feet of right-of-way with half street improvements will be necessary. 2. Significant vegetation on the site should be protected if possible and preserved. 3. The appl.icant has stayed well under the allowable dwelling units per gross acre. Therefore, he is proposing a site layout condusive to a planned development aoncept retaining open space, adequate parkinc� and unit clustering that provides privacy. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That ten (10' ) feet of right-of-way be dedicated to the City with half street improvements along the frontage of the property on SW 98th prior to issuance � of Building Permits. 2. That sixty (60' ) feet of right-of-way be dedicated to the City with full collector street improvement along the frontage of the subject site for the creation of SW Commercial St.reet as shown on the site plan prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. Project to receive Site Desig�n Review prior to issuance of Buildira.g Permits. Parti:cular attention ta be paid to pxeserving existing site trees. 4. Construction plans for the extension of Commeraial Street ahall be reviewed by the Public Warks Director. tn eleviate diffiaulties in the designated drainageway areas between parce'l �and existing railroad tracks. 5. No Occupancy Permits shall be a.ssued until all conditions placed upon ! this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department�. 6• No minor Iand partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City r�f Tigard Planning Depart-� anent and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. - 7. No changes will be made to approved plans or. speciEications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in �,., writing and shall include applicable drawings. �` `� g, Grading plans and construction glans on a11 public right-of-ways shall be submitted �nei approved by the Public Works Dir�cto� pri,oX to commencemer►t of �aprk. ` �, � .. . .� , . ,. . , , . :, _ _ . _ . , , .�. . ,..,. <:. �,, _� ' � �::�;; �.: , STAFF REPORT � � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION �� ' Ma�r 20, 1�$0 ZCPD 9-80 Page 4 � ;. . �s: �';,, 9• Public water service and sanitary servine shall be installed to tMis �`, site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. r,� ` I,. �,,,,: 10. �1 existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. 5treet + lighting installations shall b� approvPd by the Public Works Direc�.or, Cr'. { 1a.• No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day ;. , appeal period from the date of approval. � � �,.�, 12• Improvements may be bonded prior to issuanc� of Buildin_q Permits. � . � � �, 13• That street improvements be constracted to �he ar�proval of the Public 4Vorks (. , Director priar to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a Bui�ding � + �ermit. � E'`.;,'� i,,', �r:,. r';,:�'.. a,: �, :;, � I ,,, ` Prepared by d, Planning Director � ;� �''` � AHvmc y � � "`�� k;;". s;r, i+ �! C � j, 1:::�, c.;, fr=- ��i ��;�. 6k:; {.": �:� t;.'`;; � €a'�r �r; ,:-� �:; �;,, �'I:;; (:I;d ��' �; �� i'�, y� � � � . � ! , � ` r ' _ ! THE UAN LOM �'<< � KRAXBERGER ,�``' 'L. Pl�RTNER�FiIP • ARCHITECTS -'Y- � PLANNERS A.I.A. �m�'' � . " y Raleigh Hilis Profession�l Bldg. . , � 4455 S.W. Scholls Ferry Road • Portland, Oregon 97225 (503) 292-8895 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 11900 S. W. 98th Avenue (Washington County 7Cax I�'ap 151 35 CD Tax Lots 2200 and 2300 Zone Map Amendment and Preliminary Plan and Program Iteview. REQUESTs R-7 Single Fam31y Residential to A-2 Multi-Family. �_.-.-_ 1. The Owner, Gentury 21 Iiomes, is proposing a 54-unit towxmhouse condominium � project on a 3.75 acra parcel of Iand ad,jacent to S. W. 98th Avenue. Con- ,�"�� dominium units wi�.l each have se arate ara e units and p g g gu�est parking nearby. Parking is provided at a ratia of 1�55 parking spaces per unit for the entire project. The request for zone change is ta bring this land pa�ccel into conformance w:1th the Comprehensive Flan. 'The �mer is requesting preliminary plan and program review in accordance wiith Sectinn 18.56.Q20 of the Tigard Municipal Code as part of �k�is pro- posal. 2. This proposal is in conformance with multi-family designation of 20 dwelling unit$ per acre as shown on the NPO i�2 Plan and as amended by the Tigagd City Council on May 21„ 1979. ,. Section 18.56.110 af the Tigard Municipal Code provides the density factor calcu2ations as follows: �� Gross acresge sige 3.75 Minus public improvements 20X Buildable net acres 3.00 x 20 = 60 units allowed Th�.s proposal is far 54 units. . �. _ 1 ; _, . a .. . , . _ , . .•: . � _ . -- =- , _ . . , ;s ' ' r _� ` � t. . �, i; 3. There is a significant need £or hous3ng in the Tri-County area. Tigard � has a vacancy factor of 3.23 percent in single-fami.l.y housing currently and $,32 percent facCor for u�ulti-family housing which includes those units underconstruction as well as those units vacant. The intended price range of th� condominium units will attract those who wish the privacy and advantages of single-family ownership but who cannoC affort the expense o£ a detached single-family Hbme. , : Land presently zaned for multi-unit housing is scarce. Henry Richmond, Director of "1000 Friends of Oregon", raas quoted in a recent article that ' i,n the Portland Metropolian area: "Even thougtx demand for duplexes, apartment units, commonwall town- houses and other forms of multi-fami.ly housing is currently 50 per- cent (of th� housing demand market), only 7 psrcent of the land � zoned for residential purposes is zoned for multi-family." 1 ? ; 1 Further, a recent study by the "1000 Friends of Oregan" shaws that the � shortage of properly zoned land for mu1t3.-units �.s even more acute in a Washington County. Onl.y lU per.cent of the vacant single-famil� land is � zoned for lots of l�ss than 10,000 sq.ft,:. In addf.L•ion, only 4 perc�n� of the residential land is zoned for multi-fau►ily. The net result in I Washington County is that 96 percent of the total vacant residential land has an average density of only 2.8 dewelling units per net acre. "Projects for housing needs show that if a11 of the property present].y �_` �'' zoned for multiple houaing wa9 ut311zed to their highest capacities, we would fulfi�l an�.y 47 percent of ttxe pro�ected need for multiple housing to the year 2000. Even if maximum densities are aignificantly iacreased, th� existing supply of land will be far from adequate. 4nly through inereasing densities, careful land use planning and use of smaller 1�ts or clua�ered housing can we begin to fulfill the expected needs of our co�unitiea." 2 According to Henry Richmond, this 1s one of "e . . the three unresolved crisis which have stalled efforts �.n the area c�£ ].and use planning and grawth mana$ement all over the United States for alaiost a decade." The crisis he is speaking about ". . . conaists of a failure to re-evaluate and reform the kind of zoning thaC has been applied for decades in existing urban areas. This zoning ia now preventing the kinds of densities essen- t3.a1 for reducing tax costs foX the provision of services, essentia.l for allowing the construction of affordable housing, and essential for mini-- mi�ing the pressure nn open space and farmlands at the urban fringe and beyonc�." 3 This "crisis" creates two econo�ic problems: 1. The cost of providing public services to singl�-family vs. multi-unik pro�ects, and 2. The Gost to a consumer to obtain housi:ng. A Reynolds School District analysis 1 "Zand Use Crisis", Insite, Pa&e 12„ September 1979. ��' � ,�„ � ' 2 "Vacant Land Study", "1000 Frienda of Oregon", October 6, 1978. � "Land tTse Crisis", Znsi.te, Page 7, August 1979. , ' � �- � � .. ` � j: , . y. , , r. .. . �- �- f: indicates that an additional singl�-family dwelling in the distr�.ct costs twice as much in schaol aervices as it contributes to the schools in pro- perty taxes. Higher density pro�ects, such as multi-unit housing, support low density (single family) deficit revenues. I� additi�n, The Cost of Sprawl, prepared by The Real Estate Research Corp., indicates [hat: "Increased densit�es of mixed housing types (of which this project would be a part) and containmen�' of sprawl can reduce public and private capital '� expenditures by as much as $435,000,000.00 for a populatian of 1a0,000�" Secondly, the cost of providing housing at affordable prices is becoming a very seal problem. As Mr. Richmond stated, one of the main cvlprits in driving housing costs u� is present zoning and the prescribed lorr densities. In a report published by the National Association of Home Builders in July , 1979, betwe�en 1969 and 1978 the median sales price of a new single-family home in the United States has rised from $25,600.00 to $55,600.00, an in- cxease of 217 percent. Correspondinglq, the income needed to afford and the ercent of families that can afford such a house has chan ed f rom P g $10,993.00 and 39.5 percent in. 1969 ta $26,563.00 but only 23.8 �ercent in 197t3. This indicates that fewer families are able to psrchase single-family regidences and will, consequently, be seek.ing mul�i-unit housing. 4. With the increase of the prime rate, those people who do not now have in- dividual home ownerships will not be able to affard this market unless they proceed fn "steps". A condominium own.ership provides this opportunity. Demand for this 01step" was not as prevalent two years ago when mo�ey was £ � '� available at more reasonable rates. �� I 5. This proposed location is more suitable than other available sita� hecause �� it provides the raw land and favorable rates to the Owner. This in turn ,! will be reflect_ed in the overall cost savings to the cansumer for each of �y the proposec� units. This site also affers amenities in terms of Iand- scaping whi.ch will create a mare pleasing environment than many of the other possible sites. A great majarity of the exiating tre�s on the site will be savad by this design proposal. 6e The site has two single-family units with a heavy con 'tration of trees throughout the site. The topography slopes gentle fr the North tc� South and has a ffiinor wet landa area on its South end. t; The surrounding land uses ar� single family with vacant and open space '� parcels on a11 sides. Tt�e Comprehensive Plan designates the properties i to the West of the subject site as multi--family. To the South i� tha ,� Southern Pacific Itailroad tracks. South o£ the track is an. industrial '`� area. The areas North and East are designated "single-family". The �; area adjacent South of the subject site was also designated as °1�p,il�i- f' family" 2Q dwelling units per gross acre (condominium-style) . C,;� Traffic to and from the site wi.11 be aerved by S. W. 98th and a f�ture ; �`' extension of �. W. Commercial Street from the Sautheast. Se W. 98th is '' i,a � � a city �treet with approximately 1.6 feet of paving in good condition. i:;� However, there a�re no curbs or sidewalks. S. W. Commercial will be � � created from the intersection of S. W. 95th Avenue West to S. W. 98Gh i�,� when the property adjacent Sou�h of the sub�ect site is develope�, The �;° Comprehensive Plan designates S. W. 9Jth as a local street k�aving 50 feet ��°� i` � , ' , , • ' ( ( • " � .,. . , of r3ght-of-way and S. W. Commercial Sxreet as a collector street wi,th `�,�;,, 60 feet of right-of-way. S, We 98th presently has 30 feet of right-of- way. 7. Sewer and water is presently on aite witih ample capac�.ty for the proposed 40 dwelling units. S. W. 98th Street is to be improved along wth ad�a- cent right-of-way and an �ddir3onal 10 feet �of ReO.W. wi.11 be dedicated �y for that purpose. One half street improvements with apprnpriate dedica- tions will. also be necessary for S. W. Commercial Street which also will frorat this propexty. I ( '' ,,� i. ,� , YC y '��.�., , . _ _. ,, . � � � ,� ,.., �� a:��a.`�.��+� \ �- .i'_ „ �,--, ,..,,.,-. ' °' �� . CITY O�" ~C'I�ARD �:. � P.O. Box 23397 i242A SeW.Main 'Pigard,Oregon 57223 9 q�� ,L June 18, 1979 C/f'�, �`�� f`•,� � , , ��C��+ '� Cambxidge InternatianaY Coxp � yfr� ' 2206 S.E. Washinqtan Street ; Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 — i �� 1 E�: Cambridge International Co C 21--79 PD � ,..x . � , 6entlemen: � Please be advisec� that the Ti.gard P].anning Commi.ssion at their regular meet- � r ing of June 5, 1979, approved your request for a preliminaxy plan and program S review of a residential planned development of the above referenced project, � ti ti This approval is subject to the tollawing condi.tion�: � i� r l. 'I'hat 10 feet of right�of-way be ded.icated to the city with hal.f � s�reet improve�ents alang the frontage of the property on S.W. 98th prior to issuance of building permits. � . 2. That 60 feet of right-af-way be dedx.cated to the City with fu�l collector street im�rovement along the frontage of the subject site for the creation of S.W. Commeraial Street as showri on the site plan prior to issuance of bui.ldin.g permits. �, �` E.� 3. That significant vegetation be preserved as identified by the Site N; Design Planner aftex approval, of a landscape pl�n prior to issuance �' of building pe.rmi.ts. 4' �` 4. That Section 18.56,030 (Genaral) of the �'igard Municipal. Code be �' complied with prior to applicant's presentation of the general: }'� plan �and program. i� �'� �� t�� ,�� S. Z'hat site construction and, drai.nage plans especially in regards to �� manaqing the wet lands area be reviewed and approved by the City �; Eng9neer and Building Llepartments prior to issuance of bui.lding "� dt permits with any bonds or other agreements as required. t, t; 6. No changes will be made to approv�d plans or speci£ications unless �? formal application i,s made to the appropriate depar�.ment and changes t� are approved by that department. Application for changes will k�� }{ ,, made in writing and shaZl include applicable drawings, engineeri.ng ��' � ,� specificatiuns and other details reques�.ed by the departtr�nt. No ;; �y r �.�. �� , .a. .. ._. �. . ,. . , -- �;5,. � '4.V _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ S� * ~ r � � ' .. • '�I'�, Cambridge Intemational Corp. . `I ZC 2Z-79 PD �+' Page � '�. � .� constructian shall take place in these instances until af�ter the � � changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will ;y � result in the immediate posting of a stop work order on the project � or any portion of the project. If we can be of any further assistance, plase do not hesitate to cantact � this affice at 639-41.71, i 5ince re ly, � �- � ; Aldie Howard �'� Planning Director s Atislm jl . ��i � Note: The followin g acknowledgement must be received by the City of Tigard �'I wi�hin fotzrteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in action b� the City of ,'" ' Tigard. I hereby acknowledqe this letter documentin g the action of the Tigard Planning Commission. I have received and read this letter, and 7 agree to the decision here documented abide y any terms an d/or conditions attached. �i � /� z �� '�� ature (Cambridge International Corp.) at � � , I� ,^ '--' j�^ }n �I, •'�� _,��i'�..0�E!.� �wL �`�/'1�� • Signa�ure (Rober and Lauretta Piatt) �� date � �I' . �, �� 4 rx-. � U �� _. _ . . .... - • • . . • I _ < {" . . � - MINUTES TIGARD PLANIVIN'G CbN1r1ISS�nN ' �'�- June 5, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. � Pa3e 3 ,� � 1.51. acre arcel lnc ed on S.W, Ash Sl•re near S.�J, c' esnex� (Wa.sh. I Oc�. Tax Map 2S CD, T Lots 2900 & 2901) 1 Howard read the 'F FINDTNG� ancl ' O�INLENDATTONS. APPLTCP.IJT'S PR�SrtQT7a� ,.�_ ' � TION was made by Cr 'g Co es, 13505 S.i , Vil�aJe G.ren Drzve, .Tigard,Jwha sim�ly ' xequESted Commissi approv of tYie r quest, - • There was o PUBLIC TESTI Y 'r` CO.'KMISS ON DISCUSSTON A'ND CTi N� S�eak raised '-�.he q sti.on of avail.-- ability of �aer in the light f Condi ion N . 3 and the as rtion in Findi.ngs of Fact Y�o, that sewer serv' e is ayaiZ 1- off SeW. Ash reet. Se7.by ex�lai»e3 that be use of delays so times amaun�� g to several nths in sewer hookups, Recomm� dation 3 was in uded to insu t t adequat sewex ca�acity was i.naeed avail le when the �r �erty was act 11y cle loped Smith i.�quired as to i:he ulti ate configurat" n af the sit developmen , elby xepl,ied a subdivi.si.an app ication on the asis of a c --de-sar.. is pe i.ng. Rolleas M D approv of Zone Change ZC 20- based on Staff rindi.ngs and commendatio s. Fierron seconded, and thf: mo�a.ox� p ssed uzxani.znous]�y� '� 5.4 ZONE CHANGE 2C 21-79 (Cambridge Internat9.ona1 Cor�.) g�p� #�, � ; � � A request by Ca,mbridge Internatiorial Corp. fox a zone map a�-ne;anment ancl preliminary plan and program from R-7 "Si�g1e Fami.ly Residential'� zone to �,-2 "Multi£amily" (Condominium style) planned devel,op�ent on a 3,75 acre parcel at 11900 5.�1. 98th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CD., Tax Lots 2200, 2300) � Howard read the STAFF FINDTNG� and RECOMMEHDATIONS, asking the additian of Conditi.or� 6 the standard "no changes" provision. Z'he APPLICA�vT°S PRESENTATTO�1 was made by Dale Rohl o� Cambr9.dge Tntex�na- tional Corp, of .lilwaukie. He outlined the zons.ng, the inc3i,viduall.y�owned, homeowner-association-maintai,ned character of ttae development; the na.ture o� the neighborhood for which this would provide eftective buffering; the accom-- panying improvement to the adjoining stxeets. He then dis�layed a pre].imzn�.xy a�chitectural rend�ring of the proposecl developmente PUBLIC TESTIMONY in opposition was prese.ti•ted by the following; � M�bel Desdimoni quest9.oned the lot reference, the future plans for Conl-- . ' mercial Street, and the nature of buffers, all resLonded to by Selby, . Mr. Doles, a resident of 98th Avenue, voi.ced concern abou� the traf�.�_c ta ` � be generated on 98th, the legality of the 19�. size (which is in accordance wi.th � �'"� ' the Code for the area) , and the �r,eaning of "conclozninium-style" (responded to , "�, - later) . Howard e�lained that roads in this community are put in by deve�,o�ers, �%�� • � - � ,. . _ . , . _ . � � , , HIINUT�3 I . . , TIGARD PLANNING COti1MZ9520r! _ . � Jtane 5, I979 - 7;30 P.M. . Page 4 ' an� thexefore�isntil �urrounding propezty is devel.oped, 98th wov.ld pzova.de the acc�ss to this development. Less Riggins asked why the street cannot be improved prior to deve�.apment, . � explained. ac7ai.n lay Howard, urha enl�.rged on the fundi�ng saurces for Tigard str.eets �• and pxoblems connected therewith, In res�onse to a question, Sta£f explained - plans for the extension of Cammercia.7. Street as the property is developec�.. ' � Z'he rr.esi3ent as�.ed Niro R�h1 �o e�lai,x� tha phrase "condozniniu.m=sty�.e". �'he phrase, he thaugh�.v might be a misnamero In discussion with and among the Commi.ssioners it rr�ds 3��ought ou� that what i.s cs�n�smplated i.s 40 to�mhouses 3.n buildzz�gs c;oni:ai�in� from �hxee to se�ven or eigh� uni.�.s each, with aommon areas owne� and anairira�.ned by a townhGUSe associati�n� ��. the sense tha.t each hause- . holder will ov��Y a 1n� anly sligh�ly larqer thazz the ground on. which his conimon-� wall ixzxi� i.s s�tuateda i� r�r�uld be more accura.�.� �o cal.l them si.mply �owz�hauses. Nira Rohl in REB�IZ'TA�, �l�en x'espondecl to tlae vari.ous po�.nts voiced 9.n G��S05].�- � tic;n puk�lic �estimonyo John Havery of Tigard inquixed in gene.ra.l. wh.�ther the develo�er of a P1ann- ed bevelapment approved for a densi�y less than permitted by zoning cauld �.ate�; dev�lop to the ma�imum densi�y allowed by the zone, Atter_ some discussion the ! answer was that he aould do so only a�ter another hearing before the Planna.ng � Comnti.ssion. It was obsexved by �'omrnissivraer Smith this would mosfi likely be a veay unp�o£itable move for the d.evelaper. COMMTSSIUN DISCU�STON: Smith raised the question of -the disti.nction bei.�cveen whaL• is appraved in the prelzminary plan and pxogram revi�w� and tne subsequent � geaera]. dev�elopment �lan and program. Selby stated the prelimznary pl.an r.ev9,ew � is concerned with (�) conce�t, and (b) densi�y. The genexal p].an is vexX sp�cifa.c � and includes such items as l,and.sca.ping, draircage p�ans, bui.lding heights and I locat�.ons, exterior finisY�adal.l within �.he concept and density approved 5.n the . preli.minazy p7 an e � � � � St�caker abject�d �c� the ma�:.hematics as sf��ed i.n' the F�.ndangs of �act Na.�, , aixcZ r,aised th.e qu2s��.o�i of 4r1ha� opYr� space wa� co;.�.tezm�l.ated tc be dedi.cate� which ' would justify al.l ar. par� of �he 20 pexcent density increase permi.tted fax - dedicatian of open spaca. ''�'csod fe1,�t the inten�t of the ordi,nancP i,n awarding o�' . up ta a 2A pPr.cent density in.crease £ox decli.catior.� of open space d9_d not appJ,y here. Srni.�h MOVED f�x apprdval af Znne Charzge ZC 23.-73 PD based on Sta£f k'a.ndings � and Recoanmendations, wi.�h �he portion qt Findi,ngs of. Fa.ct No. 4 b�ginning with �he words "Additional .20� may h� pexmitted. ..."deleted, and with the inclusinn as - Recomm�nded Candition 6 the standard "no changes" prov�.si.on. Kolleas seconded� . and the m�otion carrzed unanimously. . , �, . . At 9:05 p.m. the President declared a five-minute xecess. �; , .. i5uv _ -� - „ ,_, s os�.a , � w � . _. — � r/r . ' o�, m -98..��,— .°—' � �_ _ _ `�� !_ � `_,-,. Wf _ ,y 2lr°� .� i 0 E r ` N.n N 1 I +�a I t� � � 1�'P`C\ I '�i, � �� ' ry� �M � � � W e '•Q� � ,��~ N�A k ` I (� h n A ' �"r�� TJ � r 3 .� .�� 1 � �� I 8" W c.1� — � d✓ `�'a � � z � �•jo � �".L PT ~;� a n' �� o =� P�'S � w �� 90 100 i00 .�: ° 1 �� = I' �'�' :� 1700 1703 � I?02 1701 �; Ssa=` -°T` " �o ,. s`9`' t,.+: .;� � ,� s � ^:: ./1'4t. a ./9.Gc. :' .2.� ,CC. .��/�C. ','��`'� j� 'by n t 69 l9�MI�wN/W/N/IMAi:��ai.:iiai�, y N �::� � .� �'' f � Y� ��.�J � ---o�°;� 3400 ^ ¢� 1 os vi -:. eos ,,• � 1� a �99 � \ • ZS � t��! �'� �`� .� 38 �\� o P'�64�33.9 :� :�! .,- '�� .y 3400 ?�00: !� g ' `� 1800 . � ,.��,.� F�9,� �s sz 3100 . .„;;r O � o �.CoAc. � u ,,,Tti �,.��°330Q �2 QO �, � " . �4�''� :. • - �, g � . '" °� 5 3 N � o 0 4 s • . 5 �:�� ' x caas a�.ar� �� T� �m ►J ° " rf , ; o � J J �''?, �i.n...w.., i�ir.. {iii/,/,ii/,oi /.i/ y io� i�ii/� /i//��%%�/// !�/�/i%'� � '� � � �.�1 .'/.;•. :i/. �%/.i i /.�i.::r%L/,//%�/�i/5;:..��;'%�i��./��::*:4.��ir/�3:�:iii,�f:r..::�„s,��i•:../,.'/:..:i�. .0 . f � I i � 66oCA. N o ��`, i N 89°3t� 1 T:T: 3 / �,�/ 8 9 57�W y � � �„ . .�..e�- ��/H Ni':�i/� r�i�,�r,,�� i iiinr�iz•.y 'ir.}r�y,is.,,, .�1 i ,/./r�i�.: ./..•/� ./�%a .iii6;%'/,.�ii �i ./.�r...:S.::i� �� 3 �9�� J � �•• . , . 30s.sa `'—'""'�.""'.. _ oq � �'' • ,,.,..r„ �l � � 312.S4 �' •i�y'' �m � /. 60 AC. � �� 2 7Q0 ; I i m = `---'_ '' d�� /.Si .4c. - . � • ! i u u a� ' �° �1 r: � �n��. ^.,_ � y� � � ' N.�F.�'W • C.S. 6�0� � ^�� ~ �� m�� fO 6.E9 Cn 1=I, �� .— — — _... .._.. _. , _ .... � _ .. .., ..� ... __ _ �! t... �'''' 6.66 C� ��x � i f'� \,J N B9°S9�E f 439.�.) `,� ' . 21 9s IS Z19.15 � . 2000 21IX3 ,�;.• 1 ; ..�2Ac. �`• � c-- A .T�tl J+C. � 441.'� p. � M FttZ7E f �" r+.�J. 592q � ' • � �?;; Z 6�0 . �� r o � � . �, � ,\ �. r� r ° 2aoi o _ , ' < � 9 r! ...� � � 1 � � ..:4,CC. A , °: „ /.Ol At. , � N ' � .�� m ' • �� A � q ��_�,�1 ��l �g��S��fl 219.�� `� �' T7 • N tlY C , O•ao.. '�'�73�wa1�7�I�7Y3;ai� . � ' ' 25W . . . � � � � �Qi 2200 � — t+..� M�J. � � �� n .9,6Ac. � � � �: - . �" Z.�OQc. �� ' . � �� . n #� � f F3�R . � 03 2 ,� � ,,� � . ; � [sa:S� 3 � °� , � ...su��.� �l �.... � . 24�3 � :� � C.S. 3493 b� 22'.4'c. • � �. �., . � � ..� " • ,�'"'-�, 6 � � 30 � N 8�°S9E (43H.3 D ;r r i,: ,s� � 6 6oth. � m �" 2 3�J� �'"' `° "' �n • �„ z ... I.7S�'C. • �� N � � 4 ��r ° r f-� �./ ..J J r ., J �\, � �C N M �� ~ ~W . .,. � • r,,,o N /L�j� +.... . �n,. � �� \�.. " ��+ � r��r� � .Y�M � , iz •./.. . . � �� . .rii,i...� J;•,;�i:/. %�/%i.'f%{��r::!%!<G%/.��j%/;%L%�/,/,��1�/N�//ry::'1%�j�%�•�'T'•^" �%j�./ �/, ' q�; � . ./i qm/;i�'i�,i/•:i;!.. i/ i i�.✓i/..%./��i�%im:Ntl'.r�. �I�I ,`:,i.,, :i 5.��:•si'��::�/,� ,t'iuli.i.!ir';rii�i%i iL./:i.v.'ri..J,n i._.yryir.../...:�' �/'.•r/r ii .a/ '` i:ii •ii./: . ... •%/%n-� ' � a •� �,� ..�______ ` •8e;_ N a�°�a e . ..- ... . . ` .. ...... .... . \ ... • . .n�nu .�ae.�.nC unRT4 w�l i Oi � . . STAFF REPORT �r`' , AGENDA 5.3 :. TIGARD PLANNING COMMI5SION April 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - DOUBLE MATH ROOM 10865 SW W�1nut Street, Tig�r_d DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 10-80 NPO #6 (SUMMERFIELD/TDC PHASE XIV) ' APPLICANT: Raymond J. Bartel OWNER: TUALATIN DEV. CO. 2515 SE Harrison St. 15300 SW 116th Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATION DATE: March 28, 1980 SITE LOCATION: Summ�rfield Drive at 109th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IODD, Tax Lot 100 and 2S1 lOD, Tax Lots 1100 and 2000) REQUEST: For a Planning Commission review of Phase fourteen (14) in Summerfield: Project A - 138 condominium units Project B - 11 Single Family �` Project C - Future housing site �o� PREVIOUS ACTION: Zone Change, 2C 5-72, Retireinent 5ubdivision, S 6-72, Phase I Subdivision, S 5-73, Phase II Site Design Review, SDR 9-73, Rec. Center Si�te Design Review, SDR 10-73, Phase I Site Design Review, SDR 17:-73, Gatehouse Site DPSign Review, SDR 12-73, Golf Course Subdivision, S 1-74, Phase V Site Design Review, SDR 5-74, Apartments (I) Site Design Re�view, SDR 24-79, Retirement Site Design Review, SDR 26-79, Commercial Temparary Use, TU 12-79, Retirement Temporary Use, TU 11-79, Gatehouse I. FINDINGS OF FACT: l. Ordinance 73-5 was passed by the City of Tigard on February 12, 1973. � The Ordinance approved Zone Change, ZC 5-72 ' 2. Exhibit "B" of Ordinance 73-5, Item #8 states "With development of this ' magnitude, road improvements will be required to serve the additional resident population and those who will use the public recreational facilites: � STAFF REPORT �� AGEiVDA 5.3 ZCPD 10-80 TTGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 2 3. Exhibit "C10 of Ordinance 73-5, Item #1 states:"Prior to the issuanae of any BuiZding Permit within the development, a site plan of the entire development setting farth the site development standards shall be subm�.tted to the Planning Commission for review and approval. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, landscaping, setbacks, building heights, signs, streets, proposed improvements, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking, service, and storage areas." Ytem #3 states: "Each phase of the development shall be reviewed and approved by �he Planning Commission. At the time of approval of each phase, the densities and uses shall be approved. . Item #8 states: "Approva7. of any lots to be subdivided shall be through the Subdivision Ordinance procedures. Item #15 states: "There shall be dedication of twenty-five (25') feet from centerline (thirty-two �32') feet improvement) on SW Naeve Street with half street improvement wh�re applicableo � �, Item #17 states: "Internal street improvements will be designated at the time of the platting of the subdi.vision. Item #18 states: "T.here shall be no occupancy with�out public water and sewer. � Item #'19 states: "A copy of the deed restrictions anc� covenants shall be attached to the approved plan to help insure confo:rmity with planned densities. 4. Applicant states in his narratitre that 1,250 units were approved. To date, 1,034 units have been built. Project A will add 138 units, Project B will add 11 units. This means that Project C, to be developed in the future, may be allowed to construct not more than 67 units. (Page 1 - Applicant's narrative) 5. Item #3 of Ordinance 73-5 clearly states that the Planning Commission shall review each phase of this development. Contrary to the applicant's narrative, this clause allows the Planning Commission to consider both density and land use. (Page 2 - Applicant's narrative) 6. Substan•tial changes irx the immediate area have �aken place since 1973 relative to development and, therefore, traffic patterns. No traffic analysis has been included with the appliaation, however. � ._ � , _. ._ _ �, ' � ' . ; ; i STAF� REPOF2T �,n. AGENDA 5.3 ZCPD 10-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMTSSION ijll April 220 1980 Page 3 ^I�' t! i� II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 'II l. The proposed uses are compatible with the previously approved Planned Develop- �I ment for Summerfield. 2. Sewer service is a concern. The Unified 5ewera e A ency has written a letter g g to the Public Works Director. (See letter attached) ; One of the difficulties is that if i:his present system fails, it effects � an increasing number of people. The gravity line should be constructed now. �' ;i 3. Naeve Road will serve this development phase and is now substandard (unpaved) . � r. A right-of-way dedication is necessary. ' i 4. 109th Avenue south to Summerfield Drive is substandard. A right-of-way dedication is necessary. TII. 5TAE'F RECOMMENDATION: i �,, Staff recommends approval of this Phase XIV review with the following conditions: 1. Naeve Road be improved to local street standards along the entire northern property line including frontage on Tax Lot 1200, Tax Map 2S1 IOD. Ful1 street improvements are to be made. Necessary right-of-way dedications are to be made to the City. f � 2. 109th Avenue be improved to local street standards from Summerfield Drive to � the intersection with Naeve Roaa. This intersection to be improved as specified by the Public Works Director. Necessary right-of-way dedications � to be made ta the City. � � 3. The gravity sewer line at Durham Road and 108th Avenue is to be completed and fu11y operational prior to issuance of Building Permits. This development ! shall not be served through the Pump Station now in operation on Durham Road. 4. Project A and Project B shall be subject to Site Design Review. 5. Project C at a later date shall be brought before the Planning Commission for review prior to the i.ssuance of Building Permits. Project shall be subject ta Site Design Review. . � 6. All tax l�ts are to be cc�mbined. Building Department will not issue Permits for a building ovex two separate tax lots. �: !r�_,, _ ... . ._ .. .. _ �. _ _ �'`; � �.i STAFF 12EPORT ( ' AGENDA 5.3 �, ZCPD 10-80 � .I � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 �"'�' Page 4 �`; 4' S�. ' 7. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all c�nditions placed upon �;,:. this deve�opment by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections j ; verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. � ; � ge No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project �` ' uxiless fotmal application is made to the City of Tigard Planninc� Depart- �F ment and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. �� , F� � g, No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal �; ' application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are ; ; . approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in �• writing and shall include a licable drawings. � '! PP �+�,. fi': �,p, Grading plans and construction plans nn a11 publie right-of-ways shall be submitted � ;. , � snd approved by the Public Works Director pri.o-r to commencement of work. �; t;;; 11. Al1 existing or proposed ut�.liti�s Shall be �2ar.ed underground. Street lighting installations shall be appraved by the Public Works Director. �'1� �< . �`', 12. No Building Permit sha11 be issu�d until the e�cpir.ation of the twenty day � ; � appeal period from the date o� approval. � k-;a 13. 'I'hat str.eet im�rovements be cons�.ructed to the a��roval of the Publ.i.c ',�orks F`�� Dire�tor gric�r to the recordinq of the final Plat or issuance of a Buil.ding ;;:; ' Perati t. f ` �,,;;'i Prepared b , Pl,anning Da,rector �-'''' �_.., F;'' AHvmc ��' �:.:: �.' �,!,;r, ',ti:,. �..:; t`' �`'. �;;�;4 x.::. r:t; �'t=' E",!,; �� r I + . �`', . r� ,,;, >�, 3C Y' �t�"� �'.'.�. .. . . . . . . ... .. . ... . ....... . ........., .�,:�...... . . . _..�..:�' • �.. �� : ..: ' .� � . CZTY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE No.73- .$� REQLASSIFYING LANDS OF TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT C M � A N O R D I N A N C E 0 P A N Y A N D , FRANKLIN SERVICE COR°ORATION WITHTN AN AREA KA�O�JA1 AS "SUP4IyTERFIELD" FROM WASHIMGTON COUNTY P-R - PLANNED RESIDEN:"IAL, TO CITY OF TIGARD P-D - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; ADOPTING A PRELSMINARY SITE PLAN KNOWN AS "STJi�L'�RFIELD PLANN�'D COMi�TUNZTY OF 1972" TOGETHER WITH GENERAL PLAN AAID PROGRAi�i; PRESCRIBING CONDTTIONS APPLICABLE THERETO; FIXING EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EiY1ERGENCX. � � TIiE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAYNS AS FOLLOWS: � Sectian 1: The City Council finds that pursuant to provisions of �- Title 18 nf the Tigard Muni.clpal Code, the Gity has here- tofore instituted proceedings to change the zone classification of an area formerly under zoning ,�urisdictian of Wasnington counr,y, Oregon which was annexed to the City by recent order oP �he Metropolitan . Houndary Commission and confirmed by City ordinanc.e, said area being � locally known as "Summerfield" as more particular�.y described on the attached sheet designated "Ezhibit A" and by t'iis reference made a par� hereaf. Section 2: The City Council lurther finds that at'Cer clue and legal -' notice as by the Municipal Gode rec�u.ired,a heartng was regularly held by the �ity Plannlnr Commission on L�ecember 19, i972 whereat all interested persons were affor:le�9 an opportunity to be heard with respect to the change in zor�e .^.lass�?�ication of said lands Prom ?dashington County P-rt - Planned :iesidential, to City of Tlgard � ?-D - Planried ��evelopment District; and Lhe:•ea:"ter �he Plannin� Com- mission,pursuant to Sec. 18.56.0�?C ot' the !�iunicinal Code, submitted to the City Council fit�dinc,s and recommendations as heretn attaehed mar;ced "Ezhibit B" and by this reference made a part hereof, that the chan;e a£ zoning class4ficatian as herein stated be approved subJect to the conditions hereto attached marked "Exhibit C" and by rePerence made a nart hereof. Section 3: The Council further finds that after due and legal notice a hearing was held by the Council a� its regular meebin� of J3nuary 22, 1973, and ther�upon by rnoti.on Fras continued to and • recanvened on February 12, 1973, whereati �7.1 �.nterested persans and the general public were afforded a further opnor�unity to be heard with resaect to said proposed change oP zoning cl.assificaLi��n of said lands described in Ezhibit "A", and the Council furCher finding that no � public detriment will result fror; the grantin� of said oetition and that it is in the public interest that said zonin� reclassification as instituted by the City of Ti�ard be a(�oroved and that said lands be re-zoned accordingly.The c:oM�;�ission'� findin<<, are nereby adopted as t:�e Councl.l's findin�,s. Section �I: The City of Tigard finds that the development of the s21d � "-'--� lands as described in Exhitai� "A" ptiz's�za�ib to the Planned Development District nrovisions of the Tigard :�iuniclpai �ode shaxl oe authorized sub,�ect to and in accordance with the following: {a) Those oonditions as recommended by the Planning Cornmission ai' ;:h� City o' Tigard, being 20 in number as here�o attached marked � "Exhibit Ct1 and by this reference made a part i�ereof. Pa;e 1 - ORDZNANCE No.73-,�� s i; i' . 1: � I: , �l1 .. �� .�` � • . ' ..., 1 . y.� , �k.� , , �{! . ��, � w (b) The develonment of naid I.ands shall conform with the general development requiremei�ts as set Porth in Title 18 0� the Tigard „ Municipal Code and the "SummerYield Planned Communiby of 1972" concept as submitted by and on beha7.f of Tualatin Developmen� Company and r F'ranklin Service Corooration, a cdpy vrhez�eof is here'�o attached marked ; "�xhibit "D" and by this rei'erence made a part hereof. , �,'. Section 5: In accordance with the Poregoing and sub�ect to each. and every requir�ment hereoi', a.rtd particularly the conditions f� set forth on tne attaohed "E�chl.bit C", the zor.ing classification oP x' Lhe lands described on the attached '0�xhl.bit A" be, and the same is � l,ereby, charYged and sai,d lands are reclassii'ied from Wasn3.ngton County � �•-R - Planned Residentialy to City o�' Tigard P-D - Planned Development � �.strict, and axe further sub,ject to each and all applicable require� f n�ents of Title 18 of the Munictpal Code of the City of Tigard. �' �' ;>••ction 6: Inasmuch as it is neeessary in order to preser+re the _ � •'� �- lntegrity of the land use regulations and to require �flherence to the planned development district reqnirements as in thls ordinance set forth, a.nd thereby provide for the oruper utilization :� af �aid lands, it is hereby declared to be ln the� public inter•est and necessary for the peace, health a,nd saPety of the people of the City �'I 01' 1'igard that this ordinanee becomc �ffeet3.ve with the least poss]_bie �,� delay, and therefore an emergency ib declared *o exist and this ordi- , nance shall be effectiv� upon its passage by the Council and aporoval �,,; � by the Mayor. � �' PASSED: By unanirnous vote of �11 Counci.l membe:s presenb, 2fter being read three times by s�umber and tttle only, this 12th day of E'ebruary, 1913. � ;..,,:, . , ' ,,', . � � , ' .� . , � . � ';� '. .� .. �co-r er - �G ty o T ��,Y'd J APPRnVED: By the Mayor this 12th day of February, 1973• � ' � � i �',� l �� /!,!' � i/�ir'C r,' ��::[.r�'_--_ ]�vor ,-' ty o� T gard I �; ,: page 2 - ORDINANCF No.73� •" �-.•- �;��- - i Y ��rhibit A^ ,r ?al.:1�• .. -y, �' Le sl Do�crip2ian � �� _�'�" � , -�v� � _,�:�.� }I ' The follo�r3ng describad ta�cat oi lassd being eituatod ia -• ..�� f�a ,. th� S.E. 1/4 n� sectioa 10 and thQ SoFI. 1/4 and S.E. 1/4 , �� • .. . ton Count Or�gon. ' �f;;=�'� ot Section 11 T-2S R-1B �I.M. 1Faeh1-ns Y, . ,�L ; �., ��' �; Be�innin� at the 1/4 carner on tho South Line of Section k :�, 10 T-2S R-1W W.bi. bein� on tho cente�linc of S,W. Durha� Road. Couaty Ftoad 1F29; Thence: t:�89 55� 20"-Y! 315.78� � ' ��.. along cald cente^line ta an inter�Thenae•�i�,'t20�h30eaEterly �, .� rigk�t of r�ay af S�71. Pacific H�ry; . 'k �. 669.7�� ore or less elong said eastorly ri.�ht of way to �.� the north lir_e of that tract described in deed P.00k 849 �::. Page 1�; mhence: alon�r tho Pforth �ine as described in �,� ,�ook 849 P�6e 19 N-39 51''� 910' norc or less to the r,-. Ea�t line of Lot 16 of the duly recorded Plat of �Uillow ��•' p..,.,.� 1:Mrm• 'f+hr_.pGe: N-0° OS'—E 246.9� �a the I;.�7. corner '�;�i ,...... —, pf Lot 15 sc►1�1 P1at Thence: aZona the �'iesi iinc �i La� �� =�. � ��_po p3�_yl 9�t;.76' to the 1�.1Y. corner of Lot 12 on the � � ecnterllno of S.','!. '�facve Strect C.R. �9��' '"hence: along , aaid cc:�terlinc of S.S7. tiaeve S�reet S�,3b 1q�—E 457.71' . i to the "�.E. cor�lcr of said Lot 12; Thence: S-0° Cj'—E «" ? 311.31' a1on� the enst line of Lot 12 to thc S.1'!. corner � ; of that tract de�crt'�od Book 279� paGe 2z1; Thcacct �� 4 k:a�tcrl;; alon� thc South li�c of.that t:a�t Z03.OU' ; � Thence: "-0° �3�—��! 20°��0� Parallel. ��r_th the eact line �s vf ;;�i� i,ot 12 ',;i1.�o�� 3rool: Fara to thc ccntcrli.�i�� of ; 5;7 1;,:^vc Str�at; 2'1:enc:c: alon�, aaid cc:��crli:;c S--G3° ; ; � 10'°:: ��;./1' �o A7 Zntera�ctlon ��rith thc ccr.:.^:,linF of 3 S'.; lU!. .h {�VC!'.ltC C.'R. �1t,15 at:d C,R. �;'00; '.Phe:c�. : S-JQ° x pr.�_ • 10?_ ''�()' ato`" thc �e*.Lcrlinc o: C.:2, i�n0 �.o t!:c �r�� ,•CG:tt `:'�C I,��C j ��I�.I.J_0'9 ��1'rJO�: �'�LiS'itl� `��l:�.`lC,( : ;^f��:�� , �`�� );').00' �,]o•:,, �h^ nol�lh ltno o: �:�:�J I�o; i tr� i:Yic �� ; „ :.,f a15o Lc.i.n;' vh! �';1 Car:�cr ��'' LOI, u ;i 'L'. r�,rn�r C :et• ., Oc:.�: :'raCt... ;' o'. . ,,, ,,..�,• ��c,�•rc.I Plat of t?:.. :Iur�,u/e�rJ.l�. ' C J ,r � y� .. 1'�/ .� l� ra1 ��.�.J `��1/ or. f � � �.�.� ;o;: 1 i!ic �c�tt•:cen �ec tio^.. :. ;� r. ,,' . : ''`"U„9 :��r� 1.51�'.�Z� �..o:n �Yic 1i:i :;ec`i�",�corncr �, co,..��c.r . ' . S� ct�u: ..�:lQ a�cl '11 �•.cncc: ..-�° 07� 5Uu_.� j2�.7�1' }; :t i�:t.. �•��_�� 1�Tic bc•t::ccn Sec��or .t:` ,.:id !1 `� t*:c ; ;:.;�, �..>;�:;, ��o:� :.�ti �� o. ti,� ::�:•�t«r-�.�� c��.: Tr1c�::; �rr.�:r��: : ' �•.�;�.�)'� �'i�-.� �jZi.�.'ll� A1.OIlj� l}:C L:O:'�til �'l;iC 0: :�U�V �.0� (� i.0 tlii.' � • �•OTI1�.'C ti�.CI�C Of� �l�"C:'ICC: J��d ��1� ��lll_:�. fZ�1�J�' � :lu: . �;; u ,:�t 1:.,; :�! Lot- 'i and v to �hc S.`_'.'. cor�•�er uf � ,,)tr �c o , � , ��_� `iO.GJ' c,c,rc• or l c�� ,i Lot �; '!'� �� co:ii:inuin� S�0 05 ►.� to t::c N.':l. curricr �: Lot 1'7 of tlic d�..'f i'lat, uf Al�ler . �soo�c F�.x�m; �heaee: �Sg° 58'-� 655.94' alo:sg t�ia.ntirth . �:^� �.ine of I�oE ].'l tr� th� conCerli,n� of �.�i. 98t�� v�n�ze ��,.;r Coun�q Raa� #�.-'�4$; P�er�ce: H-0� 09' 1�6"-E �i53.0ii' �1.ong "�- the oenter�.ine of �.W. 9$th Avenue tc� a pain� wl�ich 1.s g-0� 09' 16"-Y! 326.70' frora a 3/4" iron pipe aC the � interoectian of S.W. 9$th �venue end S.R. Sattler Road C.R. �727; Thence: N-89° 54' S6"'E �i01.9o� parallel ti�ith i tha center�ine of SoW. Sattlor Road to �, point on th� west line of Lot 1� A1der flrook Farm Plat; Thenc�: t7-0° 09' 16"-E 3?�b.?0' to tha �centerline of S.W. Sattler Road; Thence: t:-89 i4' S�"°'E 1019.39' a�long the centerline of _ 6' �W Sattler �20Ad ta the N,E. corne: of th�t tract described in . l;sect Aaolc 2��, p��;e FLs3i �ho*ico; S-�° 52' 3£�"��'i 11.�1.5b' � _ i io a 1/�" iran pipP� 7'hence: S-0� 2j'-�4 109�.6Q to the ;� , centerline of S.6'J. llurham Road C.R. 7E�429 also being thc South linc �f Scction 1]. T--2S R-1W �f.H. Thence;• 5-89° 51' �� ; d�0�'«-W 114�.0�' a1on� south line of Seetion 11 to the 1/4 j� corner; Thencc: an the south line ox Section 11 and .the �'� � centerlire of S.7l. �urha� Ro�d S-89° Z6' 3�"��'r 331•98' i �= u ThencQ: N-0° 07' 21"-E 894.26' alon� the rrest line of ', lot 19 of A�.�ier °:rook F'arm Plat to the N.�'1. cor:er thex�eof; . �,•�_ �hence: S-Fi9' :�4' .��•"~r� 330.11' �o �he N.P!„ corner of �; lot 20 said Plnt; 7'hencc: continuln� 5-89° 5�F' 3�-"�v1 665.28' alonE the tiouth line of Lot 17 aaid plat to the S,Pi. cornex therc:af; �;�'f Thcr.ce: S-�° 0�' �F5"-� �96.91f' alon� thc e•;c:;t line o� �:; Lot Z2 Alder �'rco'.: I'arn I'lat 1:o the centerll��c of S;7 Durham • �' Road and L•�:e soul�� linc oi Scction 11; Thcr,cc�: S-�9° _�fi� 16' 30"-';! 1321F.�;2' to thc S;1 c�rncr of Sectior, 11 T-2S " bcin- � ?." i.ron i�c• Thcr.ce: S-�9° �2' 07"-:Y '''y � • R-1J �'l.1.�, � p'1 , - - � 2L-27.;'(�•' alan;, t'.r centcrlinc of S;7 Durha� Ra:��1 and tltc , ! .'.� r ' '. Soutli lin� of �ec�ion 1J T-�.S R-1'J :'!.''. to t}:r 1/1� cornor ; ; , �nd thc nlaca af bc„ir.ni.::�. ' _ - �• . M cc� ..}��. F. ,.. ,. � �: Exhibit "B" ;� � � :� RF:�OLUPION OF Tf� PLANNING COt�1�SSI0N �� OF Tl� CIT7t QF TI�ARD � � ADOPTZI� FIi�IDINGS OF FAGT A.�m REC01^�PmII3G TO THE CITY COUIVCIL APFROVAI. OF' Zone Change No. 5-72 � � WHEREAS� proceedings have been rnnducted by the Plaaning i Co�ission of the City of Ti�srd with respect to the petition ; • by the Tigarrl Planning Co�ission for a changa of zone classi- '� fication from WashiagLOn County P-R, Planned Residentiel to ' City o! Tigard P-D, Plancxed Development. ; � , WHERF,AS� pursuant to Chapter 18.84 oP the Tlgard Muni.cipal f Cais after due and legal rwtice, a public hearSng r+es held by ; the TiFprd Planning Co�nissian xith respect to the above descrSbed ` proposal on the 19th day of December, 1972; ' NOM� THEREFOr'tE, the Plsaning Comoission of the City of � Tigard Ln meeting assembled this 6th day oP Febr �,uary� 1973, '' y� nov resolves to and does heraby edopt and�or approve the Yollorring ° Findings oS r^act xith respect to the sbove desigiated proposa].: 1. The sub,ject propez^ty is desi�ted S'or Urban I,aa llensity Residentiel d,evelopment vithin tl�e Tigara • k Community Plan. This category alloxs residential densities of up to 4 dWelling units or 1?. persons p�r gross r�sidenti.al acre. T�e prn,posed development ; is ia substanLial conforv�nce t+ith the Tigerd ' Co�untiy Plan. 2. That exceptions irom the Standards of �he underlyi,ng district are xarrant�d by the design snd a�nities incorporated in t2te d.evelopment plan and progrc►m. The plan includes: ' a. 201 aax'es supporting 1250 dwelling uniTS � D, 1.y2 persons per dsre.113ng unit or s �aximum aS 2400 total �op�lat3on c. Typical residential lot aree of 4,000 sq,uf+re Yeet d. 4).5 acres of go1Y course and natural reserve areas z � e. 1loproximately 20,000 squsre Poot recreation building ; maintenance building, lakes� poal, tennis courts i and parking for 125 cars. ' a, • i. Single family lots oY 50' Y 80' xith lU feet front, . �� 4 foot side and 8 foot rear yards. Rear and side ` yard setbacks may be �raived for "comnonWaJ.l" or "zero-lot l.i.nr." dve1.11n�s. a 3. T�;, develop¢�ent plan is in harmony with the sw�roundi.ng s area end uill hava e benePicia7. efYect on the area which ro�l.d not be achieved under ather zorLl.ng distri.ets. �' i- � � � �' fq; E �� i :� , C . C . . . , , , . �BB 2 � i. i ={ 1e. The system of oxnership snd ths means of developir.g, , preserving and n�lntaining open spaces is suit�sble. � � 5o Tk�at each phase o2 developmen� csa be substanti�lly .0 completed xithin one year of each approval• � �. (i. The Cou�unity Plan drxs not designate co�ccercial developmeat Sor tkye nc�rtheast ar southeast coraers of Durhe;m Aaad and Paciiic Highvay= ;; �. �a Adequate community shopping and coaunercia7. Sacilities ; esre provicled in proximity to the development--at ttLe � " King City shoppin$ center. ! ll 8. With devalopment of this maBxitude, ro�d improvements / v�11 be required to serve the additiona]. z'esident � ;'/ population and those xho vill. use the public recreational •j facilities. 9e Thc Department of Environmental 4uality has approved nonsaccugaacy building piermits--'to allov constsuction og model hones. CannectiAns to the Kiug City treata�nt plsnt rrill d.epend upon D,E.Q. approvr�l oP tbe cau�pleted tx�satment pl,sat espansion during 1973• • ,1,p. The Tigard Water Distzict is !n tYsa process of connectiug 3ts line� to thr. LFSk.e Osvego vater system. This should be completed by t�y oY 1973. �� 11. Houeing r�311 have age restrietions in the project by the deveJ.oper. TT LS FURTHER RESOLVED thst the Planning Commission daes hez°eby approve the above described proposal and �reby r�cords its recom- mendAtion Yor Savorable action by the City Council PASSED by a �H��,.•�..�� vote of° the City P].anni.z� Commieslon, =j this Cth day oP Februar�, 1973• j' L;�:.�'t �%�• c'�1��! !r o �' �' Pr�sident `; z'." ATPEST: ?'"� '� ,� r ':' ,' t ,; , . , ' f cretary k'� f:':I i?�`� �.�, [>' � 1'.' `, �;' i; ;t' �;, F; << r:, i�. r T { _ ___ � ------, . f theMrequeat 1th the tol�otiir� --..��`.._. "'''r__.o . .�• , co�ditic �: . •.'� �„M� ' • l: Frior to the inauarscs of any bui3ding p��it rrithisi '��.,,�.�' • the developmrnt. a sit� plmmn o4 tha enti� d�v�lo� t ;�;�� v a� �etting torth the eita d�velo�ent standard� ahall b� " ''�` i � submitted to the F'lanr�i Commiesion for raview and �i anr "Ext.iL it �' approval. Thia plun aha 1 isa.+eluda but not b�e liaitad �� to landecaping, aetbacke, building heighta, aigns, *�' etreeta, �ropoaed icapravenents, sidewalka, curhs� �. gutters� parking� ser^rics and atorage areaa. 2. A 11 land rl thin ?h�r dsv�loyaent ah�ll b� wed to�r � „ reeidential and r�cr�atioual osea, �xa�pL t?iat the ��' erea deaigneted tor co�a�cie use� on the aite plan `�•� may include eervice nnd/or pt�feasaiona], of.fice usee � serving tha development. IS such unc�e are approved, the Plaru►in� Cc�iaaion ehall approve the lxation, � access, aiting and rnrsga of paz�aitted �ases, �. Each phaee of the developaent ahall be rnviewed an� approved by tha glan�iag Commleslon. At the time of epproval o! each phaae, the dansitiea and u�ea ahall De appro�re$, 4. A boet and trailer etorags area ahall be deaignated is� an �rea containtd by an opaque 1'encr or sight obacurirsg landacape acreening naaintained •t not lesa than aix �b) �eet nor moro than eavera (�) feeC in height. �' S. "'he apar-t�Rnte in tlie piro�ject a�sll be devel�opsd Sn accordanc�e with /1�2 atanci�.r�ds unl�s� ofihe�xi.se �pproveti � on a spec�fic �i.te pl�.ra 'try Ch� P],ar�raln� Go�i881on. 6. The overell danmity oP the davlop�anC ah�ll be no 'S Rrreter tris.r� 6.�5 dxa111nR uriita per 8cro (125p YAta� � '�n�tte) with �a total populatioY� not to exceEd 2400 � pn.rsona. F;. � 7. The aetback,s and lot aizea as propoaed for aingl� family t�iLe ahall be approved unle�e otherwine ' specified by the Plmr�ning Cc��iasion, except th�t there ahsll be a ten (10) foot minimum yard require�ent where any yard ebuta a public atreet. ? $. �ppraval of any lota to ba aubdivided ahall ba thrcug}3 • the Subdivialon Ordirsa�nce procadure�s. 9. Open spnce ashall t�o nain�insd throu�� n F;omeo,�mere ' Aasociation or by the dQyBYpbypPB �viY.3a convenanta aubmitted 1'or apprnyal at th� iilin� o�' �he tinnl plat 10. All utilities ahall be aubsurface in�tellationa. �� 11. Housing ahall be limiterd to an average density of � � no more U�an 1.92 po�reoria per daelling unit. . 3 12. Excludrd parctle aurrour�ded Dy "Summertield" shall Z be included in the eite pJ.an, with ths possibili$y � of access providoci �v�e �nrcrla t�o �1�5�.1��, fi,}�:�xP ' isol�tiun. �t' `,� c � � � ;�� P.1 - EXHIBIT "C" ?E' ' •�?` ��% � :'�7. r _ .-, �.. . . I ' • �• I��, u�:'a . . 4 �,�,_.;. , �, .. �..,..: � 13• There sha21 b� dadicatlon to 45 reet Yrom ccnterlint on S.W. Durha.� Ro�d. 14, There ahall be dedication ot 35 feet rrom c�enterline with a 40 tnot impravcment prvvided on Saw. 98th ► wi�ere the devolopnant nbuta both eidea of the road �nd a hal% atroet S�rproeegent �rhere the development nbu�a only one eide of �tha road. � 15. There ahall be deflication oi 25 Seet irom centerline (32 feet impsovement) on S.K. Naeve Street rrith half atreet i�prnvement �lhore applicable. 16. There nhall be dedication of 30 feet from centerlina on S.'d. Sattler {�6 feet iarprovement) xith half etreet impsovement where �pplicable. , 17. internal atreet improvements will be designated at the time of the platting o� the aubdivision. 18. There shall be no accupancy without public water and �•+wer. • 19. A copy of the deed reatrictiona end covenanta ahall br •!tached ta the approved plan to help 1.nsure c rr.!ormity r+ith pl�nned denaitiea. 2U. Phese iI ot the devalo�a�nt ehall not bs apparoved unttl additionsl �ratar �Qrr+ice is avail.able tn tkie Tlgard Watcr Diatrict trom the Ci.ty of Par�land snC/or City of I.ake Oawego. Pg. �+ - Staff Repart - "Sussaerfie2d" �� f��,�� `�r✓' `�,'�� .� - EXHIBIT "C" ;:a i;�� ...x S,'r. �..,,.. . .. . . . ._ __. .. . . . � . . . � _. . _ i ; ' , �r �. i . ,�- � ��_ �, � ��f ,,�� . . � ,. F Unified �eUrera�ge Ac�ency of M/ashin ton Count �' 150 N. First Avenue 9 � 'I Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 �I 50:i o4is—&62i hl . ,� : February 12, 1980 � � Frank Currie City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Currie: SUBJECT: SUMMERFIELD PUMP STATION � Limitations were put on connection5 to th� Summerfield Pump Station ; due to capacity problems at the King City Treatment Plant. The ' King City Plant has been taken off line, and the flow from the pump station was diverted to the USA Durham Facility. j � The A enc does not have a ca acit 9 Y p y problem at this time at the Summerfield Pump Station. We also have a contract with Tualatin Development Company stating that a�ill remove the um� station within one te of acceptance o the U e a atin Tnterce tor Tualatin Deve opment Company is now working on t e plans and is anticipating construction of this line to remove the�pump station during the 1980 construction season, If yo�a have any further questions on this matter, please call , Sincerely, ��• � Donald E. Schut Division Engineer DES:jb cc; Aldie Howard, Planning Director? Gity of Tigard�--r Ray Brown, Tualatin Deve7opment Company William McMonagle, Harris,McMonagle Assoc„ Inc, � � �L � . ,� -- —__ — �.. _ _ � __ _ , � ." .,. STRFF REPORT �', AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION April 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - DOUBLE MATIi ROOM 10865 5W Walnut St. , Tigard DOCKET: CONDITIONAL i7SE, CU 4-80 (Robert Randall Co. , R:V. Stora�e) APPLICANT ROBERT RANDALL C0. OyJNER: SAN;E 9500 SW Barbur BlYd. Portland, OR 97219 APPLICATION DATE: M�rch 19, 1980 SITE LOCATTOi3: 8900 SW Burnhdm (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2,DB, Tax Lot 200 an.d 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2200) .. REQUEST: For a Conditional Use a.n an M-4 "Industrial Park" Znne far , Recreational Vehicle Storage area. 5ection 18.52.020 Ta,gard Municipal Code. � PREVIOUS ACTION: A Conditional Use,(CU, 2-74) was appraved by the Tigard Plannin� Commission for construction of three (3) mini-warehouses on this site. An application for additional uses was filed in Marr.h of 1975 (CU 7-75) . Staff recommended denial of the request, but asked that storage be allowed in Building's A and B and rec�uired cbnditions on Building C (See B.xhibit A and B� . The Planning Commission denied the request for an additional Conditional Use but supported the Staff Recann,:�n��ationd on May 20, 1975. . _ ,._ Conditional Use, eCU 24-76�allowed an upholstery shop on the site. Conditional Use, C CU 38-77�was approved to allow electronic's assembly on this site. In this case, the Planning Commission established certain criteria for each operation wishing to locate nn this site. Stat�' has used this criteria in each instance when a new tennant applies for a Business License (See Exhibit C) . One of our primary concerns has been fire/life safety. The Fire Marshall and Code Enforcement Officer have been asked to aheak out eaah space periodically. I. FTNDTNGS OF FACT: j 1. A major portion of the Fanno Creek floodplain area between Main I Street and Ha11 Blvd. has been designated for a park. Currently, plans are being preparad by the ORB Group under the direction of Jerry Dragoo. ' �, , �. _ . .. � �i �� : , Y - STAFF REPORT �, AGENDA 5.4 CU 4-80 ' TIGARD PLANNING COMMIS5ION April 22, 1980 Page 2 2. A portion of the land proposed for R.V. Storage has been designated in the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan as "Greenway". Policy #7 of this Pl'an states;. "Retain the 100-year floodplain of Fanno CrEek, its tributaries and the Tualatin River as an open preserve (Greenway) . The Greenway shall be established as the backbone of the open space network and when a direct public benefit can be derived, i.e. , adjacent residential development, the I Greenway should be developed fcrr passive recreation and pedestrian/bike I travel". 3. Ordinance 79-73 defines Greenway. (See Exhibit D) 4. Section 18.57,040 of Ordinance 79-73 allows "off street parking" if a Special Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission. 5. Applicant has agraed to dedicate a certain portion of the floodplain to the City. (See site plan) 6. Statemenfi #4 in the Applicant's Narrative needs to be clarified. CU 7-75, Condition #6 states "no outside storage of materials, vehicles, waste or ' �.,. debries wi11 be permitted on site'°. The record is not clear as to whether or not this prohibition was intended for the buildings only or for •the entire site. If the latter is the case, then this use woul.d not be allowed. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: l. Area has been designated "Greenway" along the 100 year floodplain elevation. 2. A major downtown park area is planned; a portion of this land is includeci in this plan. 3. The Tigard Senior Citizen Center will be constructed to the south and east of this property across Fanno Creek. 4. There is some question whether or not this should be a Conditional Use in this zone from the recoxd contained in CU 7--75. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this request with the following conditions: 1. That the actual area used for R.V. storage be approximately 28,000 square �'eet and that no portion of the 100 year floodplain be used except for the landscaping and fence construction. A revised plan shall be submitted and shal-1 be approved by the Planning Direotor and Public works Director grior � : to commencement of work. r, .� �J * », STAFF REPORT �,� AGENDA 5.4 CU 4-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 3 2. All land within the 100 year floodplain which are not used for the fence or landscaping sha11 be dedicated to the City for park purposes. 3. Fence shall not impede the flow of floodwaters. 4. Detailed engineering plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Director and approved prior to the commencement of work. 5, Half street improvements to oolZector street standards shall be constructe3 for the full length of frontage on Burnham Street. All plans for these improvements shall be approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 6. No changes will be made to approved plans or speaifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate c:ity department and changes are appr�ved by that department. Application for changes will be made xn writing I! and shall include applicable drawings. 7. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street , � lighting installations sha11 be approved by the Public Works Dixector. { 8. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty (20) day appeal period from the date of approval. Prepared by 1 , Planning Director � ' �,. .. _ _' _- _q.,�-.. .. . _.. . ... . .. ,. .. . , - � STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 �� TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSTON - Ap ri1 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowle.r Junior High - DOUBLE MATH ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard � DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 I� (Main Street Development/G.I. Joes) Preliminary Review APPLICANT: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OWNER: J, B. Bishop and 10505 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 H. J. Buchholz Por.tland, Oregon 97219 , . Same Address � APPLICATION DATE: March 25, 1980 SITE LOCATION: Southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of 200 parcel #3) REQCJEST: For a Zone Change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District" ' Zone for approxa.mately 11.51 acres. �' . � PREVIOUS ACTION: ��.� Applicant submitted plans for 5ite Design Review, SDR 1-80 on January 16, 1980. The Planning Director returned this application and the fee. Applicant was instructed to request a Zone Change to C-3MPD because sensitive lands (flood- plain) areas were involved and because the potential impact of the proposal de manded review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I. FINDTNGS OF FACT: l. All of the proposed uses are allowed in the C-3M Zone. 2. Applicant has included in this proposal a Sensitive Lands Permit request. 3. Applicant does not presently own the area shown on the site plan west of the present curb of the existing 99W off°ramp down to Main Street. Property is owned by Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and will have to be declared "surplus" and could then be auctioned. This process is lengthy. ODOT, Mr. Bill Geibel, has indicated to Staff that in all probability, Mro Bishop would be the "highest bidder", but �hat is not guarant�ec�. We, the City, could request a dedication of this property to the City from DDOT. This might expe dite the process. Tt would then be possible for the City to lease this ground to Mr. Bishop under certain conditions or to se11 it to him. �. . • r STAFF REPORT .AGENDA 5.5 ZCPD 6-80 �, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 2 4. Applicant has not addressed the r.e-alignment of Johnson Stree� through 'this property to Ash Street. Staff has suggested this to 'the applicant, but no action was taken. (The site plan does not show this re-alignment dedication nr traffic pa�ttern.) The traffic study which was submitted with this application does not include an overall traffic impact assessment for the entire Main 5treet area effected. It me.rely counts the cars and projects a method to accomodate this traffic from the site to 99W. No consideration is given to Johnson, to Burnham, to Ash, etc. 5. Applicant's narr�,tive does not mention facilities £.ar public transportatinn (TriMetd on-site, other than to say. . . ."mass transit, i.e. , TriP�et, is available to the subject location". Nothing on the site plan indicates that �ublic transportation facilities are contemplated. The plan proposes parking .f.or 529 cars. An "indirect source permit" will be required from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Application for this permi.t is in process. � i 6. NPO #1 - Policy #28: "1�1n additional benefi� provided by th� extension of � Ash Avenue will be a mora convenient access frnm the Neighborhood to Downtown ; businesses. This makes possibl.e local and convenzence shopping trip� withaut II venturing onto Pacific Highway. It will also ai�d the economic viability �� of downtown redevelopment by making the area more easily accessi.ble to a larger market.�� II. GONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The plan as submitted does not address the primary concerns of Staff relative � to traffic circulation (i.e. re-alignment of Johnson Street at 99W through project to Ash Street wi.th an intexnal. connection to Main Street) . The ° p traf.fic study as submitted does not adequately address the impact of this � 'i development on traffic circulation in the entire downtown area. This � traffic study is site oriented only and does not address the larger issue of � overall impact to Main Street, � , 2. The plan as submitted includes property whiah is not now owned/contralled by the appliaant. � f IIT. STAF'F RECOMMENDATION: ; Staff. recommends denial of this Pr.elimi.nary Plan Review for a Zone Change. { When the £ollowing aonditions have been satisfied, Staff recommends that the � applicant return tn the Planning Commission: i �` . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 �. ZCPD �-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSIOIV Apri.l 22, 1980 Page 3 1. Applicant to provide a traffic study which clearly inciicates the effects of this development on the entire existing and proposed transportation system in the Main Street area, including written evaluation by ODOT concerning both 99W traffic and Johnson Street, Main Street traffic. 'Phis study is to include details on re-alignment of Johnson Street to Ash Avenue, Ash Avenue through to CommerciaZ Street and the re-alignment of Main .Street into Johnson Street within this development. Various alternatives should be clearly indicated and addressed. 2. Applicant to address specifically the fact that a portion of the land he has included in his project is not now under his control. A method of resolving this fact must be presented. (Applicant to provide adequate facilities for public transportation (TriMet) within this development.) 3. Attention to be given to reducing �he impact of large structures to imrnediate surrounding areas of residential developments and the proposed Fanno Creek Aark and Gre�nway area. .A.pplicant to relate this proposal more specifiaally to the "intent" of the Planned Development Section of the Code included ` herein; "PD/18.56.010 Purpose" (See Exhibit "A") r �. 4. Applicant shoiald have an "Indirect Source Permit" issued for this project by the Department of Er�ivironmental Quality prior to the Planning Commission's ; re-hearing, unless the applicant guarantees to make any and all adjustments to this proposal to m.eet the requireme�nts which may be p�.aced on this develop- � ment by DEQ. _ STAFF NARRATTVE RELATIVE TO THIS PROPO5AL: The primary underlying difficulty throughout our discussians with the applicant has been the resolution of the transportation system. The Public Works Director and the Planning Director have repeatedly asked for Johnson 5treet to be continued through �this development to eventually conneat Ash Street with a connection to the noxth to Main Street crossing Fanno Creek. Compounding these difficulties is the fact that the applicant has a lease on the Western Oregon Marine ]�uilding which will be in effect for a certain length of time, pos.sib:ly until Octobe.r of this year, Added to this, is the problem of ownership of the land immediately west of the project to 99N1• The addition of traffic signals at the southern bounc�ary of this site on 99W is questionaY�le also. Ini�ially Waremart was not included in this project. When this tennant was found, the "warrents" could then be iliet for the traffic signals to the south, Obviously, changes had ta then be made to the traffic study. However, again, the study only addressed the � �r. - • . 1 • A' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 � ZCPD 6-80 �` TIGARD PLANNING GOM�I�SSZON April 22, 1980 Page 4 site in relation to 99W and did not analyse the larg:er impact area. The site plan now shows ingress/egress onto Main Street on Tax Lot 1200. � The traffic study does not provide the necessary details which we feel we should ' � have, to a.dequately address traf�ic circulation. The applicant has told us that he feels we should provide the details. The onus is totally boin by the de�eloper and, until Staff, Planning Commission, and City Council, is in total agreement with the traffic plans as submitted by the applicant, this project should not be approved. It is anti.cipated that the applicant will tell you that ^, he does not control the land to the east of his proposal and that he cannot provide the necessary right-of-way through to l�sh Street. Staff has recently discussed this issue with Mr. Bensen, a future developer of property on Ash Avenue directly east of this proposed development. Mr. Bensen would be ;; conditioned to pxovide the connecting link. for Johnson Street to Ash Avenue at the time he develops. It is anticipated that the applicant wa.].l. repeatedly point to the fact that the ` i< Johnson Street connection has never been discussed, that the NPO #1 plan by ; Car1 Budke discnuraged the alignment. Our comment is that timeShave changed. `!?i A ti" � The applicant will relaf.e speci.fics on cost, Note that the total cost of �the � proposed traffic lights on 99W (south ingress/egress to project) will. be paid `� for by the applicant if he is allowed to devPlo as tanned. It seems lo ical � P I�- g �'s� to Staff that these traffic signals cou].d be installed "internall.y" at the �'; intersection of the new extension of Johnson and Main Street. j'' �M1 We are considering major changes in the immeda.ate area of Burnham, Ash, Commercia.l, ;i Ma?n, and Johnson Streets. Z'he Park Board has designated the Fanno Creek area �,`j fr�m 2�Iain Street to Ha11 Boulevard for priority park development. We have �: discussed the civic complex ideas with the City Council and consultants, The �� passibility of a civic complex on Ash Avenue and the ORB Park proposals could ,- significantly change the entire development of this Main Street Zone. To date, �;; the developer has refused to consider the "overall" impact of this proposal "j i. on this 1•arger area. �'�� ?;�� t;� i,, Sta£f has no difficulty with any of the proposed uses. We feel that this #',^ �roject could "anchor" south Main Street and bring about a re-vitalization of j� �the entire Main Street (C-3M) area. It is our feeling that the trafiic cir- " ,''y culation patterns will alter the sxact placement of buildings, but that the ,� uses will remain the same. Therefore, we would recommend that the applicant ��: be instructed to return to the Planning Coznmi.ssion wh�n the traffic circulation :�}! �` p��terns and traff.ic analysis have been approved by the Public Works Director, i;� (;;': and QDOT. r<`; E�, C,�. �) i';: r, Hp'. A }:� �i'a j� t,, � �� a L I . STAFE' REPOI2T AGENDA 5.5 � ZCPD 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 5 'I TriMet is about to propose the construction of a transfer station on Commercial. The U.S. IIank at Scoffins and Main is proposing to rebuild soon which wi11 mean elimination of a major traffic problem in that area. What is being sugge,ted throughout this narrative is that the entire area from this development to Scoffins is changing very rapidly. We have a chance now to align streets, to revitalize the area, to plan ahead for the improvement of this community. NPO #1 has filed the enclosed document with the Planning 5taff. (See Exhibit "B") Under Heading I. , South Main Development, the NPO states - "The need has not been adequately identified for the re-alignment of Main Street and the Johnson Street extension to Ash Avenue �hrough the development�'. In the next paragraph we read, "careful consid,eration be given for the traffic impact of such develop- ment". Heading IT states the NPO's priznary concern, primary priority - the extension of Hi11 5treet to O'Mara. Heading III, Ash Aveazue Extension - the NPO does not see the need to extend Ash Avenue across Fanno Creek to Burnham and wish their neighborhood protected. Staff was very specifa.c in its presenta- tion to this group on April 2, 1980. The time for a transportation system is now and it inaludes Ash Avenue to Burnham. This has been a topic of considerable � � discussion for years. It is our feeling that Ash A�enue should be extended to Burnham and then to Commercial Street. The NPO #1 meznbers avoided the real issues by placing priority nn the Hill Street extension to O'Mara. Note that they wanted the Ash Street right-of-way "preserved" and their neighborhood's "residential character" protected. i. The real issue is the "greater public need". If we do, in fact, place a civic complex on Ash Avenue where the Public Works area is now, and if we do develnp a park from Main Street to Hall Boulevard, then it seems logical to assume that this entire area will change. Ash Avenue wi.11 be extended to Burnham. 'I'he NPO #1 members realize this fact. The Planning Commission may be asked to re-design this project at a Public Hearing. Staff feels that thi� is less than appropriate. A greater public must be served. The developer can certainly submit his proposal to you, but �'�llowing your approval, the developer may leave us all with the product, some liabilities, �cnd no insurance, for,a long time to come, Prepared by YPlanniny Director � �.. �. �', ,_ ,. ' __ . _ . ..."'�•� __ . ... . ..-..a:�f �. , ,n � . ,._ . .... .. � .... . _ . .... _.. . . . _.. . . . .. �/ .. . .,�kt-r.a>., ..�„GSST. . . � � ''� _ . . -�' � �. � , �ir/�/ b> � la . �� . b10 �-•18 56 ° 015 �: .� � ;-`�: a Ch�.��er 18 . �G �` �k.. �' , PL�,�JNE� DE�iELO�i'E�iT DIST°ICT i°-D! ;�� ;; 5@G�10115 : 18. 56. 010 Purpose. �`» ' I.8 . 56. 015 Sens it�ive l�nds . �u ' 18 . 56 . 020 Preliminar1� devAlopr.i�nt pla:; ar.a. �ragram. :r ` 18 . 56. 030 Gerleral dev�lo�nenr plan an� ��oqr�.m. 18 . 56. 040 r��tion and ;:indin,s . �: � 18 . 56 . 050 rinal plan and �rc�gram. � 18 . 56 . d60 �pplication ct �ta:�dar3s . ` 18 . 56.070 Minimum sit� size . " � '.j 18 . 56. 080 Cvmaatibility srit� neighorhood. � ' � 1.8 . 56 . �9Q Lot cvvera�e . � , 18 . �6 . 100 Open space. '�* 18 . 56 . 110 Density. '�� 1 � 18 . 56 . 120 5ubdivision lat sizes . * �.9 . 56 . 130 5taging. ;; 18 . 56 . 140 Permi�ted uses--Resi�ential districts . �;� � 18 . S6 . i50 Major changes . `� 18 . 56. 150 Mino� char.ges . � 18 . 5b . 16S Mini.mum streG� caidths . 18 . 56. �.7fl Canstruction time r�eriod--Extension. - =;�: ` �,, 18. 56 . OlOT �urpose. T'he nurpose o� the planned devel�p•- ° ment i� s�ict is to provide opportunities to cLeate more de- 4 sirable environme�ts througn the applica�ion of ilexibZe and div��.si.fied land development standards under a comprehensive .. plan and program prof�ssionally pr�par�d. The planned d�- Velopmen� district is intend�d �o be used to encourage th� application vf new techniques and new technol.ogy tv comrt�ni.ty : developm�r,t •�hich will result in sugerior living or develop ment arrangenents with lasting values . It is further int�ndedv- , ' ta achieve economies in land develop�r,ent, maintenance, �treet `;..� =; systems and utiiitiy ne-t*,�orks while praviding building group-- �° �� ` ings foz privac:y, usable and attrac�ive open spaces , safe circulation and the ger�*-a1. �ae11-being �f the inhabitants . � Fina.Lly, it is i.nkended to e:�sure tha� develo?�mer.t an sensi,.tive lands sha11 be carrie� c�ut in a manner which protects the hEalth, sa`�ty and welLare of the co�nunitjr . ;; � (c��d. "19-4% �1 ($) r 15'?� � 0°d. ",'1-� $4 � EY.h�bil ?� (part) � 197? : Qgd. iG-32 §185-1 , 1970) . �s 18 . �� . 015 Ser.sitive l�r.ds , �11 parcels contuining sensitive l�,nds must be rezcned as �lanned de"-elooracnt ;� ' < c?srric�s be�are any future d��1��pmenc r�tay +�ake olace. ' The plar�r_ing commission ma_; .3ran� exc��z��n �rom this r ' 7. rnqu�r�m�nt l� 5F'P1Sitltie �.3P_C�5 dr'° 1°-`_ 11I1�°�:E�On°Cj. 3I7C� �;j �he olanning corr.;issior_ fin�s tha� a pla�n�d c�evelo�rnent � � � 29F� (Tiqard 7/15;79) . ;�. • �, . . ;::. , , _ __, _. _ _ _ _. .. __ . _. _ . _�. _ ... _. , _, . .,_� .:. .. » ..;". ��r�,��, ��`�',�'� ,;�,�o�;��` , .V ��/' / � . ' �/hs/ ,��C�^"�'�- �`�Z /��- c' �/� l J , T�: The City o#' Tigard ` ' � FROM: Neighborhood Planning Organization �`�. ( a . i Uver the past several mariths NPO �1 h.�s revaewed and disc�.issed a ! number n.f current issues relating to development anci plarinirig fo.r the NPO �1 area. We fPel th�t our discussi�ns Yiav� 1�ad us t� � consenses on sever��l issues and as sl�ch we wish to provide aur � throughts to the city planners and decision makers. We hope to � provide assistance in the in�ter ret�,tion ot the ori � P gina.l NPO r�1 � plan as it relates to the various i.ssue� be:�'ore tlie Tigaz°d Planning S�aff at the pr. esent time. �nle have ac�dressed each issuF, both � independently arid as th�y rela�te to each ather and rvotzl.c� like to � off.er the followin�: J I . South Main Street Developmcnt i i W� Yiave reviewecl the recent develo ment � � p pr�posal,� for the Sou-th end of Tigard ' s Nlain Str�eet( s;pecifically �t;Yl� proposal. �f Mro � Bishap and Mr. Buchholz) as we11 as the Ti�;ard P1.a��nin.�; Staff ' prop�sals for downtown trazfic c?x�cula.fiion and the r�ali�;nment of C�- Main Street. � '�le a.re supportive o:f the concept o�" a major shoppin� ��x�e�. develop� ment at the Sou�h end of P1l�zri Strec�t. TYiis development a � r.nnsis- �ant with the curr��t N�0 plan for two prinlary reasans. I 1 . The proposed dev�lopment, in :Fac�;, ha:, �re�.ter rronta.ge on Pacifa.c H�.ghway tharz it does on, Sou-th A7aiz� Str. eet ar�ci as such campli�s with. policies #1F3 and �}1q, ::�u�;�FSti.r,�; -the a.vaidanre of Pacific Hi.ghway strip developm�n�`. By �he ?��e �S' controlled access to Pacific Highway, triis �type deve�LopmPnt provides common parkin� facilities to clu��ters c.0 bt��irics"E5, 2. The proposed development is furt;her consistent with the original NPO plan that address�s the desarabi].ity oz supporting downtown Ti�a�d 's "sma11 town persoriali-ty" by providin� the commercia]_ economic base �to "anchor" tlxe Sou�l;h end of Main �` , . -.� • ' , Street. With �i;he suffic�:ient cu�t�nmer dratnr provided tYlen on �� ;' both encl�.�_of Mairi Str�eet, thP Tigard downtowri c��r�.l.opment of , small shops a,nd a "unique commer�ial �.r��" i�, more la.kely� to occure. Consideration of these points t'avors the dev�lopment that has been proposed �'or the South encZ of Main Str. eet over tl�ie Tigaz•d Planning St�.ff praposal for the realignmen�t of Mairi S��re�t., vah'�ch wc�uld significan�ly reduce the develo�rner��t poten�tial ai lViain a�tr�et ' s South end, The need has not been ac�.equati�7.�r i.d�nt�.f'ied for� �the reali�nment af. Main S-tre�t ar�d ths J�ohnson ��:reet, ex�t;ensiran to Ash Avenue through the developmento WhilP we are supportive of development at �he �nd af ;vlain atre�� we strongly recommenc� careful considera�cion U� �iven !'or �the �traf.- ic impact of such deve�.opment. Tr.afEa.c is our prc�mrinent concern. --� Justification ar�d insti:l_1ata.on aI' contr�ll�d acc�t��,s�s tc� �'acific xi�r�way at two location� should be en�phasized. � � In general, it is our opinion tha�; a major develc�pn,ent at the South end oF Main S•treet is not only compa.ta.ble w�.til tr►e arigi.naJ. NPO �1 p.lan, but with due car� in -Lhe desa.g�ri of traf.f'ic t'low coi�ti�n1 it will be an asset to the Tigard communitye TI . Hil1 Stree�i; Extension to Omax•a In line with �he original NPO pl�.n� the F�xtEan�i��n of HiJ.l Street to Omara appears �. desirable priori�ty objec�tiv�. �Ie wisY� ta identify our suppor�t for the desirability of �,ht� E:xtension and su�gest that sY�ol�ld dc��lopmc�nfi: c�ccurc; in tk�.i� ax F�n, ti��: capabili�y to preserve righ-L--�f--way �'or the c:c�nnection of ?-i'�. 1.1. ,3trE�r�t tc� Omara should be assur�d. This specific cancern: shc�uld b� considered durin� the review oi the S�ni.or. Citizen. Cen�t;ex• nurrently proposed for this area. �' . , � �,._ . . � � . . _ .. ._. .. ..�.� . . � .... . .. . .. ... .. .. .. . . . ..... ..._,.... .. .. .. . ._,. . .,.._ .. .._u. .,,..:.:: r,. „. . ....._.... ,��..�....:. .:;,...:......_,�.�..... __�...., .�.,..,.w __..._.. __ _.....:... n....,.. � ..a_�....�� w..a.�...,�.,�.��.,w,.:..�..:...M...:_�....,.,..�.�.�,..:..,_,�..�.. -� . . , r •" " , ., . .'>y ,�• • ` � � � -:n Y� , ' T�I . �1sY� Averue��xt�ns;ic,n �- ��Je Izave�revi.�wec� t.i1c A�:k� �venu�a ,:;trE-� t, �:c�: �::t',�;�i c�r� c�ucs- ' *.� c�n s:i.nc� it waa r�xi.:�Fc3 k7�� he ma �ard P1�:�?•11��.� 1 �,� .- 1;a f'�' ir� i ��s Ct(�;1N2'1j:OW]'? �j.'1�r�.T'(� CJ.X'C:U�.fl�:1.i�Tl �.I.c1I1S � .^iF� Y;e��,'E� t,C'��C= i :�('! k:•�; 1�1C:' 1:��:�U(-?:i r�ii�F�7 �ay th�, Ti��rd F1.an��.��r��s `�taFf , �s w�11 ��,, �ho;� r�.� se:d by 1�he citiz�rzs rr' A:�h Av�nue ar�d 1,h�� immerli� t.F� �:rE�� . �:tie d�:� nofi, �.t th.i� 1:irn�, sec: a r.eed �� ex•tE�nd 11�h k��rE:r��xt:�; l�;ctive�rero �;h�� It�.h �'�.ver��r.� ri�;r�;�oi'-way a.c�•ast� �'�he �;re.c:��v�y ;��1°��zlc1 bc� r�rf'r;t-:x°� ,.c! . Frc��t;ect;ic,n O.� �:he ��r'@.S']C�E?tlt.lc^._1 C}1:�.1"c'�G�:2}"`� Oi� ��'14' E�:i�"i fit'P.£3. T'!:':� r'il'r,UY•}lUC)C) ;3riU1��.C� �� ;hc hi�;Y►e.� t, pr i ori�t;y� �,i �t}��i:� ar��,e �� . E< � ',r ` ; '�w*`� .i y �� r;� � .,,.n-rt«_.r.,u ..:....�r n. .,..,., rv....'...r.� ,�.+....a.,�n. .. .i.:rv�... �..rry.y..:mrnn. ...,...wr a�. � ....... . MMC".ar.rtmw ..mY,.rau. . . .. .. ,vmK�wt ?n. � .. .• .. __ ....._..:._._ .. ..a.�_. .. _.�...�...y... ..,... �