The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 03/18/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. MIPtUTES s<,, : TIGAI2D PLAIdNING COMI�ISNTON ' �� 1�Iarch 18, 1980 - ?:30 p.m. � � Fow�.er J'�nior ��igh Schopl: - Loctu�� Room ` 1q865 S. lp. Walnut Ste - Tigard, Or��an President Tepedino OPENED the meeting at 7:35• RQIaL CALI,: Present: Helmes, Kol],eas� Popp, Smith, Speaker, Tepedino Absenb; I3onrz, Funk, Ha•rron �taff: Howard, Selby The MINUTES of the �'ebruary 5 meatin� svere considerod, and on motion by Speaker, ,�econded by Popp, were unanimously approved a� submit�ed. No COMMUAIICATIONS to the Planning Commission were reported by etaff ox commi.ss�.aners. Prer�3.c�ent Tepeda.no rc�minded cqmtni�etonere af • tha booklet from the State Ethics Comn�i.sa3.an and th� neceasity of completing and returning tha acca�panying d3.sclasure form. The Presideat apened the PUBLTC I�EAFtINGS portion of xhs meeting by reading the usual not�.ce of a�,thcri�ty for arici th0 procedure �o be fol.lowed in the meeti.ng. C; 5.1 SUBDIVTSION S 13a79 (St�udio E�ta�as) NPO #�6 A re-hearing af the app�al .reque�� Y�y �x�. Itrpickp Mr. Caaper and Mrs, (iolden of the appraval r.iecisa,an by the Planui.ng Director in referQnce to the Prel3.mi.nary Plat Subdiviaion request by the Tual.atin Denelopmen� Cor�oration on a half- acre lot in the R-7 p1� "Single F'amxly' Residont�al Planned Developmentff zone 7.acated adjacent east of 9185 S. W. Durham Road. (Wash. Co. '��x Map ZSl 11�C, Tax Lot 142U0). Tiovrard read the STA.F'F 1�F, L�'OAAT and ST�FF �2�COMNl�1DATION. The APFLICANT'S FRE.SENT��"ION rtas mr$d� :��r $�.11 MCMonagle; 8905 S. W. Commercial St. � Tig�ard. Ha repor�ed �'h� oeiner, Roy Brown, had met with the app�a'Lla4ts, at w��ch time lae explained that this parcel is part of the 5ummerf3.eld 5ubd�,vi.Bion aatd �ub�ect �o ite privilegee and responsib9.lities. Th�r princ�.pal point �;� issue remained the acceess onto Durham Road.. A tampor�ry access onto Durh�ym R�ad from t.h1,�s parc�l would be permi��ted. I��and when the aci3oi�xing Kreiek �iroperty �.�� developed, acce�s fox Mr. Axoen's parceZ and �he Kreick prope�t� r�oald be brought into 11ne uei�h �. W. 92nd Avenus, �nd �he �em�orax�y a;�a�ss would be clased. Th3.s axrangement had bc�en ap�roved by the Paki��ic �York,� Director and the Planning Director. PUBLIC TESTIMAN� oppos3:ng the proposal was as•.�cl�lo.ws: ��.. *** pawn Kreick, q�.85 S. YV. Durham Road, who ob�ected to the � • � MINUT� xI(iAFtD PLANNING CQMMISSION Ma.rch 18, 1980 �, Pa�e Z addi,t�.onaZ acce�s onto � very busy partion of Dtu°ham Roade She stated her �atnily� �ias no intention of selling, thua making the �+temporaryt° acces� quite permanent. *** Mra. C1ara Kreick, 1694o s. W. Matador Lane, King C��ty, an r��rner of the T{reick property. She reported they txave no p�:ane for d�trelopmenti in t.he n�as future. **• Graae G.hapman, 15915 S. W. 0�3s Meac�ow Lan�, stated that after the meetin� rr�.th Mr. Brown she no longar ob�ecte to the four uz�its on h�.s propesty, but atill teJ.t the ��perman�n�r acc�se c�u'tlinad by Mr. �ScMonagle w�s no� rig.h� under the circumstance,�, and �rondered if the �ftemporary" acce�ss m:�ght be made perraaraen� becaut�a �lte res3.dont� of Studio �statas �rou:ld not have ta b�,ck �ntm Au.rham to geC out. � COMM� xSSION DISCUSSION AI�TD CA TION: Smith s�n� Spea�isax� got clari— �tcati�n tfrom staff of the aaces� proposa].so Fopp t�ueQ�3,oz�ed how tY►i� s�.�uation gat �to this point, Mr. McMonagl� ace].atsd thd p�s� h�.stor� and af�i.rra�d hia coneiction the pra,posal as submitted is the be�t availabJ.e under iche circumst€inceso Helmer rai�ed �he ques�3.on of oranerek�3.p of �ax Lat 12000, and Spoaker �ot canfirmation �rom McMona�le ; that the easem�r►t t�hictx h.�;s been gra�n�ed by �ualatin Development ��.. Company �.s 1ocaCeci izs t�.he �outheagt corner of �the lot, thue connnai.tt3,ng tha future develo�n►ent of �ccsss froan both �?L 7�.00 (I�reick) and 142f�0 (wStt�di¢s �s�a�Css) to an e�entual road�ray acroes the sout.h �orti�n of TL r40Q an.d the eoutheas� curner oP �S, 12000 tn an entranGe d�.r�c�:Ly �s� lins with 92na Aver�ue. �2ather relu�tant].y Po�� 1KOV�I� approqal� uf Subdivisiox� S 13-7q: �fStudia �sta�es�� basec� on Staff k'ind3�ngs and Recouimendations zn the final act�on utaff Report dated Not�emb�r ],, 197g, on thir �ubtiielsio�� ►ith the stipulation, that if at any t�.me the Krei.cts prnper�y (T�, L�t 7�:00) is aevelo�sa, a condi�ion of that deve�.opment sha11 be that a single �oint aGCQes be ��o,r�.aaa for bo�h Stiudio E�tatea (TT, 1L�2pQ) Fand Tax Lat 7�.00 onto Durham Road op�osite S. W. 92nd Anernue; and until this development takes place� that Studio �states �e a1.lo�ed a �ingle dlrect access anto Durham Road-. The motion xas secanded by . , Smith, and earried vtith Kolleas voti.ng no. 5.2 ZONE CHAAiG� PLAN1dED DEV�FMENT, �C k'A 4-8p {U—Fiaul of Oregon) I�PO #4 � request by U-Haul of Oxego� �or a zone raap amendment ririth � (�eneral P1an and program rqviex approval fram G�.'ty of Tigard C�� "�eneral Co�Qrcial/1 to C�5 P'D ��I�Ii.�h�ray Co�ercial � Planned Deve].opmentn zone to operate a vehicl� rental r�nd ��..._ _ ... , .... _. . :_.. :. � . Mzrru�Es � TIGARD PLANNI'NG COMMISSION �Iarch 1$, Z98o �� Page 3 storage facil3ty on a 3•57. acre parcal located a� ��g52 SW Pacific Highrray (Wash. County Tax �a� isi 36nA. Tax L'ot 900), �toNard read the S"� F REI(SFtT and RLCOMMENDATIONS, i � The APPLICANT�S PBESENTATIOPT vras made by Ke�.th Van Etten, $8�C li S. E. Foster &oad, Portland• He 'briefly outlined the project and ' t.he re�sons Yor U—Haiul to establish a center in thls area. Ii� asked for clarification of Staff Recommend�.'tion �to. 4, particularly x3.th respect to the exi.sti.ng Uui].ding which is to be remodeled and is not sub�ect 1:o the cond3.tions aimed at 3.n Conda.tion Na. 3. ,Selby agxeed . occu�r�ncy permi.ts should be granted on the old building wi.thout having to meet all the requiremen�ts of Conditi�rn No. 3. Hoevard �ug�ested the developraent be done in two phae�se—the remodel3zag oY the existing building, and the con�truc�3.on of the ne�► buildings, '�hus occup�ncy permits for uso of the remodeled old building wou3.d , no� have to await approval of facets of ne�r construction, �hich mig�it eome only somo�rhat later. �'klis �tas a�reeable to Mz°. Van �t�en. Ha i��roduced Vic Thomas oP Thomas ConsuZt3.n� �ngizaeer�, 101>7 S. W. Barbour Boulegard, who expla3.ned certain cond3.tions �f pre•�ious fill. �. etc., aYfec�ing the use of the site a.nd s�eps to be taken to correct i�. w. There was no PIIBLIC �ESTIHiON%. ..�.4...�._...�.. CQbII�4�ISS,�ZQN DISCU.SSIOH AND ACTTO�N�t Sinca eommiseioners appe�red to have no g�ro'blems with �he pra3�.ct�"as gr�aen�ed, 5�eaker PSO�dEA a.p�Oroval of Zone C,han6e AG 4�-80 ,tt�ae..d or. 5��'� Findings ar�d Recotnmend�— ti.ons. �he motion was seco Q� la �e7.mer. 1?ca had ue�tians of Mr. i �t� ,9 PP Q Thomse about the reconstruction Q:� t�he f�.].l and dra:inaga of the site. The mo�ion then. passed unan.imously. 5.3 Zf�NE CHAN(�E PLANN�D DEVELOJP�ENT, �C PD 1-80 (Holman Project) NPO #b A requ�st by the Tualatin ]3evelopment Compan.y Inc. for a zone m�;p amendment with a Prelim�.nary P1an and Pz�ogram Review request f�om 1Nashing�on Cou��y ktS�l (one si�gZe family daelling unit per groes acrej to City of Ti��d R�-7 PD ��Urban La�r Dens��y planaed Develnpmer�t�' zune on a �otal area of y.0.14 acres loca�Ced at 98,�J S� Durhaqt Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 �.�8. Tax I�ota 3Q1 and 100). This item was tabled by the P1.anning Comm�.s�:iox� on February 5� �.980. Haward read the 5�Ak'F �RT and R_F',�CQ_}4�ENDA�ONS. �� The A,PPLICANT'S P�?ESF�T��'ION �ras mad� �ay V�.ad Vottillia of Tualatin � Dev�el.opme�nt Co►�psnyq 1SSU0 S. i�e 116tt� �,venµe, T3.gard; an,d Joe Waleh of ' �i ' MINiJTES �i TIGARD PLAI�TNING COMMISBION March 18, 1980 Page �. Ylaker Associates, 110$0 S. t�. A7,len Boulevard� Beaverton. Mr. Vo�'�illi� �: exg�lained the principal features of �he propoaed cievelopment with tY►e !, aid of �our large aeriai. photographe, maps and r�nderin�s. He descr�.bed the marke� the small lots and small unit� were designed to attract. He stated the projec� has been renamed Copper Creek, sinae the name iNhispering Woods selectec3 earlier wae not permitted to be used by them. Mr. Walsh quoted fram the Planned Development ordinance �en�i expl.a�.ned how this development fulf3.11s the intent of tk�e ordinance. Of. al�out five acres of greenway near the Tualat3.n R�ver, he affi.rmed it was buildable, but that they stayed out of it because th�► ad3oining Pick's Landing deve].opmAnt is not going to bu3.ld on it. He preaanted + a diagram of the parcel laid out a� a regular eubdi,vision, rrhich he � characterized as '�massive", while yielding only about 100 unite an '. t�0 acres of 1and. Fie expl.ainec� the concept of ].ocating the un�.ts an 1 sma11 lots in the buildable �reas, w�,th th� rest o� the land to rema�.n open space cared for by a homeowners associat3on. He des�sibed thia plan as being desi�ned far singlea and oouplea who are not interec�ted i.n maintaining a large house and 1ot. : Mr. �Valsh theri shoared a serie� of ali.de� of the parce7.. 3.ncluding ' (�.� views to surrounding areas, of Aurhaar Road in the vici.nity, oR the seve�al deep d.rainager�ays, and of the areae to be built upon. He pointed out the proposed tra�sportatian plan, with an acce�e on Durlxam Road �or �he eastmrn per+i�r_ n% tlxe developmen.t. He indicated connec- tions with Pick's Landing, and p�oposed connec�,ions to Rneeland Estatas on tha east. He dePended the minimum 3200 square foot lots on �he basis of the considerable amount of opexa space ad�oining or near the l.ots. Tie went throuy;h their concept af the calculation of density. Fie discusaed the 30-foot atreets and countered soffie of the ob�ec�ions to tYaem a.n the Sta�'f Report. In response to a question by Smith he etated there pill be no restrict3.ons for ab�, family composition, etc. Selby aeked if the applicant had any market an�lyses or demographic studies in support ofi their concept. tValeh indi.ca�ed this was intended to be a presenta- tion princi.ple--that the studies raferred to wquld be included in the general development plan� Selby questioned the number of 750 square foot unite. Walsh indicated their preliminary �7:ans rxese for a range of units from 750 to 2,500 aqraare feet. Subeequently �hey have conc3,uded t;here r�i.11 be na units 7;ess than 1�000 square feet. Again, since this 'i r�as 3.ntended to be a hearing to gain approval in grinciple, the number �f units of eaoh ��.ze has not �ret been Ee�. There �ras n� PUBLIC TESTIMOPiY. ��' COMMISSIO DISCUSSTON AI�tA A�ION: Helmer a�proved the general � _ _._.. .._ _ : >'I � i . �: � ,� • MIN[3TES ' . �� TICiARD PLANPlING CQMMISSION I�Sarch 18, 1980 �' Page 5 �� 1 conce�,t but did not like the deneitys the narro�v roads. He doubted the ,parkin� refu�es would wor� t�ery wall. Speaker �.nquirod wlnat the procedurea might be to allow the appZ�.can� to meet the concerns of the commiss�.oners. Staff pointed out the cl.eanest procedure qrould be to deny i�he zone chan�e and taave the applieant come back wi.th a revised plan raeetln� the commissi,on�s ob�ection�s However, it was also pointed out he could not corae back for six months. It w'a� suggested tabling thia request wauld enable the ap�licant to meet the exprc�ssed concerns I without a six-months delay. Smith indicated definite approval of the concepte embodied in i this propa�sal--more economical etreets, small lots and sma1,1 ixn3.ts. He felt access to Durham mi,ght be a problem. He euppo;rted the proposal in concept. Popp felt the parking wou].d be a real prob].em; the lats ' are too small; open s,pace 3.s unuaable spa'�e; too many units in too little s�ace. Kolleas agreed with Pop�. ,I Smith in.qui,red of the appl3.cant i.f they would be receptive to the tabling action--would they end�avor �Co mest the concerns expr�esed? I T}xe reaponse �as affirmative. Teped3.no a�re�d wi�h the expresaed canaerus for the density and �tree�s--espaa3.ally for emer�ency vehicles. ,II He ob�ected to the number of issues st3.11 unresolved between the f°" I �„ ,�a�f and the appltcant�o en�inesrs. t Popp ques��.oned t.he method aY arriv3.ng at density and .hoped it � could be clarifled. �e thereupc�n MOVED for tabl3.n� oE Zone Change Planned Developraent ZC PD 1�-$0 in order th�t etaff and the applicant might work out a revised preliminary plara after consideratioa� of th� � aoncerns egpressed ton3ght. HeJ.mer second8cl the mo�ion. Selby asked I for clarification of the commission°s eoncerns, prese�ting a list of `I those he perceived: right-of-way of streets, paving width, oper� space (developed ar undeveloped?), senaiti�rs land areas, number df off•etreet I parking spaces (ie it enfQrceable?) , density computations� no direct acaess onto Durham. Th3.s list was agreaable to �ha comp�iesion. Eiv�rard suggestsd tabling �o the May Planning CQmmis�ion me�ting, at which '+ thi.s would be f3.rat on the agenda. T.his 3.s to allow the City Council I and the Plan�ing Commis�si,on to maet together in ordex to get clarifiR � cation of certain concegte and policies� thus giving t�,e staff a clearer � dlrection to foll��r in this and other cases, e� a more generall�r acceptable plan can be presented. He $ug�ested the NPO get involved I also. Smith questloned the density calculation, and Selby aa�.norrledged the staff calculat3,on was not co�xect accordin� to the Cade. ! I xhe Presid.ent then called for the vota on the motion to table, ��I whio� carried unanimously. l� At q:50 the Pre�ident declared a five-minute reae�s. +I � � ' fl �I r E: 1. k �, �, ^ ;I • , • tl . ' MINUT� '7CIGARD PLANNxNG COMMTSSION P4arch 18, 1�8A �� ka$e 6 5.� ZONE CHA.t�TCxE PLANNEb DEVEIAPMENT, ZC PD 3-80 (Park 217 Busindss Center)" 13F�U #5 A request by Trammell Crox Company for a ma�or change request at th� General P1an and Program Revievr request level main- �� e 1 Commercial Planned of i ard C- PD G en ra t nin the Cit T 3 a3. g Y � Develapmant�� and M-3PD "Light Induetrial Planned Development�� zones on a �otal area of 20.6 acres loca�ed at 150 feet soutk� of Pacific Highway �n the ea�t side of S.VY. Garden Place and 572 fee� south of Pacific H3.ghway on the east side of S�� Ha11 B].vd. (Washo Co. Tax Map 2S1 1BB, Ta.�s Lota 200, 300, 800, 11.00, 1101 and 1?_00). Haward read the 5TAF'F REk'U�3T and R�ECOM14�iDATTON3. He requested addition of Staff Recommend�t�on 15 as follows: "IIoe of t.his property �hould 'be limited tn �he hours 7:�0 �.m. to 8:00 p.m.;' which 3.s in accordance wi�th Ordinance IVo. 76-39: '�C ?•40.070. (NOTE: It appears the intent �►as to prohibit �rucl� traffic irn night�time hours in accox�dance with Staff Itecommenda�l:i.on 7, addect at the hearin; of December 4, �.979, for an ex�ension of the Planned Development District on th3.s parcel. That �;, condition raac�aa follows: '�Tha� truck traffic be��re�n � ` 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m« to the si.te be prohibit�de" �See page 5 of the minutes of Dacember !�.) �he APPLTC$N�aS PRES�yNTATI0IQ was made by �zic Saito of MmcKenzie/Saito an�d A�snciatos of T'nr�land. He presented Bruce Hosfard of Trammel Crow Compat�y and Mr. MacKenzie and another enginee� frbm A�acKenzie Eng�.neering. Ntr. Saito deacribed the nature of the business of the Trammel ' Crow Compariy �a.d tl�ei.r past projects, and s�ated this project is quite s3.milmr to the one already approved for fihE ei�e. He felt tt�e concexns of the Planning Dep�tment had been fully addressed in the �alanning and en�ineerin� done for thia pro�ect. He agreed with tho 5taff Repart and Recommendations, with the possible exception of No. 15, wl�ich was ne�r to him, and ti�en offered to an�wer quest3.ans. The only PUBLIG TES�� SMONY was offered by Iv�,n F. Jack, 12330 S.W. Kno1.�. Drive, an ad�oining lando�rner on tk�e south. Ha was �aamazed�' tha� he had not been notified of thie heara.ng, and asked why �hia hearin� , was bein$ held. Tl�e Prosident deferred thq qus�stion to the cror�s�exam�.- , natiox� perioa. ' C�20SS-�CAMIIVATION AND REBUTTAL: Selby stated there �.s no change in �,....., ... ...r�.ur.... .......u..�. the zq�ing desi�nation. Hc�wever, under the PA ordi�nance any charage in f� a. i _ _ _ _ r ___ � M2NUT�S ' TIG,ARD PLANNIN� COMMISSION March 1.8, 1g80 c`? Page 7 specific uae requires a publlc hearing. On th3.s stte �tzere was a change from recrera,tl,ona�l fAG1�.3.t1.8A in the C�*3 zone ta offics space--both permi�tsd use� �.n this zone. Other changas in t�uildin� l.ocations are permitted wit,hin thQ zone. He explained �he source of notif3.cat�.on and did not know why l�r. Jack was mimsed. Staff stated this would be checked 1nto. The President s�ated .lagwl notificat3.on through �'he • local newspaper is a11 that is required, but that staff doos try very hard to �ive mai.Zed notificatior► of such hearings to neighbors. Mr. Jack ques�ionad the he3,ght of t.he buildingsa he reaal�led previous st tements th t no buil a a d�.ng w�ould be more �han 17 feet tti�h, which is probably loarer than a twcy•story buildinp;. Saito explained the terrace effect, and asked for a 38-foot hi�h buildin�, call.ing a't�ention. to the previous approvsl of a five-story building. Anno Craig� 12360 S. W. Knoll Drive, descxibed a drai.nage prok�lem on�o her property, and inquired ab�aut access through the project wh�.ch had been previously arranged. 5aito stated the� acce,a� would be provided through one of their pr�.vate drives rathe� �han a public atreet. He described �he drainage system �o bo provlded, which �vauld �i.ve better drainage both to thc� project site and IMrs. Gra�g's praport,y. Popp questioned drainage and the speeial use permit in �he floodplain. Saito detailed the ne� ga�.n of 536 cub3.c yard� of flaodplain storage. Smith inquired the deptl� of the cut in the floodplain. Saito referred � to FigurQ 1�. of thQix� presentation, which ind3.cates a maximum cut of abou� two fae�. The fill to make a nortion of tha site developable varies from less thun one foot to abaut l� feet�•-there i� no deep fi11 requ�.��i. S��.th cal.2ad attsntion te thP rg�i�i rgr� �nt;��t�,t�,pYi elevat�,on above fXoodplain--�.8 inch�s•»whiah is met in th3.s pl.an. SAito deeeri bed tha work done with tY�o Public 19orks Direr.tor, who approves the aalcula- tions as submitted. Speakex inquirad whether the fill previou�ly put in to mnke the tiered effect is an engi.neered �'ill. Saito actcnowledged this may be a problem requiring excavatlon of some of �he old fill, which is the reason �or thsir ,request of two-atorq buildin�s. T.hey anticipated the problem, and lxave budgeted for ite J. B. B�,shop of S. W. Barbour Blvd.� Portland, quegtioned the acraa�e of retail. Sai�o stated they wish the flexibil3.ty o� all conc�i,ti;o.rial: �nd permitted uses in the zone. COMM�,,DISC�USSIOfJ AND CA TION: Hor►axd asked fc�r an additional cond�.tion to Staff I2ecommenda�ions as follows: Na. 16. '�Acceas �o �ax Lat 30i be to the a�proval of the Public Worke Director, the appl�.-� cant, and the owner of Tax Lo� 301.�� Alsa Condition No. 17: ��Speci�ic attention s.hall be pa:Ld to alleviation of the drainage difficultiss �xperienced on abutting propert3,es.�� '`� Sm�,;�h raissd tho que�ti.on about the amount of cut and fill in �._ _ ' MINUT�S TI(iARD PLANNING COMMISSZON March 18, 1980 �� Pa�;e 8 the floodplain we havc� perm�.tted in the pas�G. Selby ur�ed �a.ch case be considered as an engineering problem. Smith stil]. aton,dered if tho commi$s3on is changin� poli.ay. Tepedino reviewed comm�.ss�on policy in t�he past as com�ared wit.h the policy since the adoption of the reviaed flaodplain orci3.naneea•there hae beon a change. Speakar commented that this j.,r not on t.he main stream but rather is at the very top of the 100-yer�r floodplai.n i.n a tributary backwater, and as such has no efiect on stream flow or direction, but or�7.y on f7.00d storage, whiah is increased by 536 cubic yards. Ho�ard outlinPd distinctionr� between what is or has been allowed in indus�r3.a7. and residential situati.ons. Smi�h expressed concern that conceivably �ith the more lenient floodplr�3.n policy, a consi.derable acreage aou�.d ba rec2aimad throu�h the cut�and�fill procedure, but xarned that such cuts could easily and quickly become fi�led with sedin�ente Howard sug�ested this problem could be eolved by cozadition3.ng maintenance oP such cuts to the satisfa�tion of the Public Works Directar, which woald be a condition attached to the land. Smith questionec� the open epace plane Se1by stateci this is not part of the opan space p�an fox Tigard, so there i� no violat�ion here of tktat concept. As a result of this discussion Howax'd suggested tae bring back a revisod floodpl•a3.n ardinance �ith perha�s a couple more cx°itexi.a for commission considera- tion. Tn responsa to a question, Saito stated th3,s project a3.11 have ' an even more pleasing appQarance than the Koll Business Center, in which , �`� his firm was also involvedo � President '�epedino called for a motion. Howard pointed out the i{ applicant specif�.cally raquost� a11 �srmi.tted r�nd condittonal uses !, a�plicable to the �an.in�, and for a 3$ �oot build�.ng height. Before offaring a mation, Popp queetioned adequacy of paxking, especia:L�,� if thore is muc.h xetail space. �Ie then t C)VED approval of Lone Chan�e Planned Development ZC �D 3-80, based on Staff Findinge and Staff F�ecommendat�.ons 1 throu�h 17. The mation was seconded by Helmer. j Howaxd sugges�ed that if this retail parkin� situation is a real concern of the commission, we cou2.d condition a no-cost haaring on any ? propased rotail tenant. Aftar further discussion Condition No. 18 was � formulated as fol.lows: "18• Prior to the start of constsuction on ! Phaso� 2, applicant shall eubmit to Planning Commiss�.on a list caf propor�ed ca�il!�Src3�al uses.�' Since this ��ras an addition ta tixe motion on the ; ` .��ox� the President �sksd fos an amendment to ttle �notion. Popp moved .��nent to his motion of inclusion of Condition No. 18 as� discussed. , :�#�� ee.conded, and the amendment paesed. The voto on the moti.on for appxh6val, as amsnded by the addit�,on of Recommend�t:�on 18, then carried, with �apedino voting no. - �� _ : I � MT�IUTES � TTGARD FLANN'TNG CaMMI�SIQN March 1.8, 1980 "`° Pa�e q �� 5.� Co�DZ�zorr�. osE, r,v 2-80 (Bruneau's Carpet and Fttrnituxe Cleaners) RPq j�]. A request by bSr� Mxc.hal�a Hsuvelhorst �or a Conditianaa. IIs� to operate a Carpet and �:trniture CZeaning business in a C•3 M '�Main St. Comtnercialo� z�one on a .22 a�xe �arC�i ioCatea at 12551 SW Main Stroet (1�ash. Co. Tax Map 2�1 2AG, Tax �,ot 80Q). fToward read the ST �' I�PORT and RECQMM�NDATIANSe The APPLICANT'S PI�EuENTQTTON Nas raade by Mike Heuve].hor�t, ].6139 S.WP. �lalug� Drive, Lalse Osrrega, oamer of the building. �e stiated the proposed use is not a generator of much �+alk-3.n traffie--ttLat moat of the bus3.ness is done 3.a people's homes. Brunnsau°s does ]:eaee one off�street parl�ing space in cnnnection with the estat�l3�ahment. �her� was no FU,,,,_BLIC TES�„x?M�ONY. COMMI�SSfiON DISCUSSTON A�TD CA, T�ON: Smith MOV�;ll appro�al of Condi� t3,ona1 Use+TII-80 b� Staff Fincii�gs and Rec�mm�ndat�,ons. The F,� motion was seconded by Kal�.�as a�nd passed unanimously. ��.. �.6 a and b < ZOPI� ORDZNAtJCE �'k�C�' �'I�TDMENT, 7,faA 2-80 an�l ZO.� 3-80 f�crward raported ZOA 2-�3Q has to do with lot rQquirements and bu3.ldin.g laeightt�� setbaeks and open opac� requirements fr�r �aulta.ple•-�'ami].y zonea. f�e reported one foreaeeable problem: on �mal].er parce7Ls �he result might nat ba what �.a dos�.red. He sug�est�d this coul.d be hat�dled �t the time an applieant came in for a �one c�an�e. zoA 3-8o sets foxth tlzo method oY figuri.ng deneity ca].culatione. �ia�Yard asked ttlese be approvad �y the commiseion for sub�tission to the City Council. After only sZ3.ght commission comment, Popp MOVED the comm3.ssion forraarc� these txo zor}e ardinance ata.�ndments, 7,OA 2e80 and �OA 3�-$0, to the Gity Council with a recommendati�n for adopt3on. The mn�ion was seconfled by Kolleas and carx°ied unanimously. 0�,_,THFR BITSr, I�S: ' Hnward roported Ken Selby is 7��aving t,he Gity for em�laymen� i,n �llaska at the end of �Ghe weok. He ia interviewinge and hqpes to k►nve � a nevr etaployee by May 1. ta ,� . ,i MINIITES ' xI4Al2D PI,ANN'xNG r0A9MIaSIbN March 18, 7.980 ��, �'age 10 Howaa�d rapor�ted �ct�.on af' tt►e Ci�y Council vrith respect to NP�D member�. ,'N�ch NPA �ri7.1. aons�.st of' seven memk,ers, Kho mx��t be approved ; by t�ZQ Pa.a:nning Comm�.ssion r�t:her than nominated by 1.� citizens a;a heretofore,. He presen�ed a list of geven nan�es for approval to vario�a i NPOs. S�eal�er"raoved approval of the sev�n. The mot�.on wae seconded by Kollea,a and pasaed unanimoasly:,, Howard explainQd t.h�s inherent confl5.cte in the NPU plans and csr�tain positions taken by the P].arin�.ng Cammi.esion, ea�ecial.ly on hi�her density, emal].er lo�s, etc. He �uggested Flan�ing Commission representa- tion, at the upcom:in� .hearing before t.he Counc9.l on the Wineom Terrace �PPeal'• Tk�e C3.ty Council aboli:shed the Site Design Review Board as such, and in the futur� si.�e design �ppeals fromi staff decisions Will como to the comm3.ssiono kio�vaxd t�ld of ons such agpeal which will be com3ng up, Howard outliz�.ed matters whic.h will come before the commission in the foreseeable futura. �' Tepedino paaseci out a copy� of an ord3:nance of the City Qf Eugene ��., with regard to conversidn �o condominium�. S�eaker stated hLs canvictian such conversinns shou].d coma befQre �he commi.ssion fo� agproval beCause uf t:he change �:n land �zae from approved rental to o�rner�h3:p, pnintin� out �hat under LCDC gexa.daline�; we �ust provide ho�sing Yor a x�ange of xa�r'!R Qf d��fex+3.n� circumstance�, �nd �Chat n�4Fi R g�a,a c� �.fford. �b rent o£ten can,not afford to buy4 �he President aeked �ta�f to get an og�,na.an f.�om Gi�y Counsel on �v:vhat Yaig�t be done i.a� this regard. After some fux°t.her general. di.scuBS3�on �he mee�C3.ng ad,�ourned at 11:2$a �> �.4' _' � --- � " "PL�AI�TNING COMMISSION SIGN-ETP SHEET" k � ; NOTICEc ALZ PERSONS DESIRING Z'0 SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIFi NAME ON THE ' APPROPR2ATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BA4�K OF THE ROOM. PFRSOLVS DESIRING TO SPEAK 6VILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON ' TNDICATED TTEM(S) . AGENDA ITEM: � / ,��'I.t,� ��iu�Ci� REFERENCE: S ��-7'�j DATE; �/ � N� ADDRESS {'r �,p..�g,.�C./1..� (�.�2..1.�� /tiS U J C7 U.� O� `�.�,er�•..�jj� f'a , � `' ' ��C, �� j li � ` �� G�/!�/0� G-.� ��S ��'�G G/l�,/�E�ICl/',G ��r �G�� ' v H-�` •t��'1 L� �� ''� �._._ • � /� X�'( �`2i1.�i.�. '!-_.rL-`'�' -J '�`��i'U' 7'//f�'Ll��'L ��.,.-�o �',� � � �`� .5�'�" �C�1 a�K.�:YIc`�da�u L.ti�, � AGENDA ITEM: � •Z. ��e'�.L_�I�� REFERENCE: �P� Sl°�U DAT�: �� NAMF ADDRESS � � i ��2.�.� /C�/�'� �5;��7 ,�� .1�-� ��-� ' /�l-f � 8�1� S�. �v��z .�, ��, AGENDA ITEM; S:3 Ol�hna�� REFERENCE: ZCPJ, �—�v AATE: ^ N� ADDRESS � �4 �' L / � ov e�.� f�l�'°L.0'�� i G.�2� 02, c� _ �� /v�o G��i� �3�.,uv ,,�L! � ' ; , ; , , ; � � . — . .. . a � _ $ 4 , �• �`, ' 1 ' , �i "PT�NNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET" '\• ' � NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE � � APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE E3ACK UF THE ROOM. PERSONS , �I DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHATR TO SPEAK ON i INDICATED ITEM(S) . �_C'�'� Z/] fLUd• (yi•�Z-i REFERENCE: '�c� 3—�C� DATE: 3 tP � I AGENDA ITEM: j� / �� N ADDRESS � i � / �✓ �-�'/��L.L ,G> / /�rI iIv I . , � i ' AGENDA TTEM: S'� ,J � , REFERENCE: � ,G� 2 °'"�U DATE: N�� ADDRESS �.t AGENDA ITEM: .��6 C� ff��t gEFERENCE: ��A-- Z -�O DATE- I � � N�M� ADDRESS � i i �'• � . _ _ _ _.. . . . .,. ..,,.,,_,�.M ,�.. ,... �;.,_.._.,. ._......,..,_. . :.� ��__- � , PUBLIC NOTICE T'iG.SRD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Rm. • 10865 SW Wa�nut Street, Tigard 5. Public Hearings 5.1 SUBDIVISION S 13�-79 (Studio Estates) NPO ��6 A re-h�aring of the appeal request by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cooper and Mrs. Golden of the approval decision by the Planning Director in reference to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Developtnent Corporation on a half-acre lot in the R-7 PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development1° zone located adjacent east of 9185 SW Durham Road. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11DC, Tax Lot 14200). 5.2 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZC PD 4-$0 (U-Haul of Oregon) NPO ��4 A request by U-Haul of Oregon for a zone map amendment with a General Ylan and program review approval from City of Tigard C-3 "General Commercial" to C-5 PD "Highway Commercial Planned Development " zone to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3a51 acre parcel located at 11552 SW Pacific Hzghway (Wash. County Ta�x Map 1S1 36DA, Tax Lot 900). i 5.3 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZC PD 1-80 (Holman 1'roject) NPO �F6 A request by the Tualatin Development Company Inc� for a zone map amendment with " � a Preliminary P1an and Program Review request from Washington County RS-1 (one single family dwelling unit per gross acre) to City of Tigard R-7 PD "Urban Low Density Planned Develogment" zone on a total area of 40.14 acres located at 9830 SW Durham Road (Wash. Ca. T�x Map 2S1 14B, Lox Lots 301 and 100). This item ;aas table3 by the Planning Conunission of February 5, 1980. � 5.4 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZC PD 3-$0 (Park 217 Business Center) NPO ��5 : A request by Trammell. Crow Company for a major change request at the General Plan and Program Review request level maintaining the City of Tigard C-3 PD "General Commercial Planned Development" and M-3PD "LighC Industrial Planned Development" zones on a total area of 20.6 acres located at 150 feet south of Pacific Highway on the east side of SW Garden Place and 572 feet south of Pacific Highway on the east side of SW Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1BB, Te�x Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101 and 1200). 5.5 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 2-80 (Bruneau's Carpet and Furniture Cleaners) NPO 4�]. A request by Mr. Michale Heuvelhorst for a Conditional Use to operate a Carpet and Furniture Cleaning business in a C-3 M "Main St. Commercial" zone on a .22 acre parcel located at 12551 SW Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lot 800). 5.6a ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-80 (Citq of Tigard) A request by the City of Tigard for a zone ordinance text amendment for Chapter � 18.24 creating zoning regulation for the A-20 (20 dwelling units per gross aere) and A-40 (40 dwelling units per gross acre) "Multi-family Residential" zones. I . 5�.... . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . .. � .. .. . . .. . . PUBLIC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 - 7:30 PM ,, Page 2 5.6b ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 3-80 (City of Tigard) I A request by the City of Tigard for a zone ordinance text amendment for Chapter 18.24.110 relati.ng to the number of dweYling units permitted in a Planned Development district when the underlying zone density is divided into the n.et buildable acreso � TT Publish March 7 and March 12, 1980 � �,,.,_ , _ . __�. „ _..,_ .____._,> _.._�.._ _ ____ STAFF REPORT �`., AGENDA 5.1 � March 18, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. TTGARD 'PLANNING COMMISSION FOWI,ER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTUI2E ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SUBDIVZSION, S 13-79 "Studio Estates" (Ref. ZC 5-72 and Prelimina:zy Plat #11 of Phase IV S 2-76) . APPLICANT: Mr. Roy Brown OWNER: SAME 15300 SW 116th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 APPLICATION DATE: October 18, 1979 SITE LOCATION: Adjacent east of 9185 SW 17urham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 11DC, Tax Lnt 14200) . REQUEST: A re-hearing of the appeal request by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cooper, and Mrs. Golden of the appxoval deaisian by the Planning Director in refexence to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Development Corporation on a half-acre lot in the R-7PD "Single F Family Residential Planned Development" Zone. I �.. PREVIOUS ACTION: � January 22, 1980, the Planning Commission upheld the appeal request denying the Studio Estates Subdivision approval. There was some confu.sion as to the legal ownership of the subject site and whether or not Studio Estates was part of the original 5ummerfield P1at with the applicable zoning. �ese' issues hav`e since been clarified by a meeting with Mr. Brown and the surrounding neighbors on Februazy 18, '1980. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomrnends that the Planning Commission re-hear the appeal to determine the merit of the subdivision. Prepared by Ken Sel , Approved by A oward, Associ City Planner Plan ' g Director vmc � �,.�...,. , _ .: . .-,- , rT, , , , - ,.,� _., ....�_ _..,_. ,... ,. ._._ .�.�y .w,,,-.,�. ._ _:. .,._ ...� .....-., STAFF REPOFtT AGENDA 5.2 TTGARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION March 18, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junio�c High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut St., Tigard ' II DOCICET: ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-80 (U-Haul of Oregon) APPLICANT: U-Haul of Oregon OWNER: Mr. Thomas Reid C/0 Mr. Keith VanEtten 11552 SW Pacific Highway 8816 SE Foster Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, Olt 97266 APPLICATION DATE: November 19, 1979 SITE LOCATION 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36nA, Tax Lot 900) REQUEST: For a zone map amendment with a General Plan and Program Review from City of Tigard C-3 "General Commercial" to C-5PD "Highway Commercial Planned Development" Zone to ope.r_ate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3.51 acre parcel. PREVIOUS 4�. ACTION: On January 22, 1979, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional �,� Use request f�r vehicle rentals and storage on the subject site with the condition that the applicant return with a detailed soils test�and plans showing how they will handle the sensiti�e ��aads area�together with other staff recommended conditions (See IIxhibit "A") . The applicant has been required to submit a General Plan and Program application for this second hearing by the Staff. This requirement is in keeping wi.�th Section 18.56.015 of the Tigard Municipal Code which requires any alteration of sensitive lands to be designated a Planned Development. 7."he applicant has submitted all the information requested by the Planning Commission on January 22, 1980. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Exhik�it "B" is the Staff Report from the Conditional Use request application (dated January 8, 1980) which will serve as the Prelimi.nary Plan Review, 'I"his report clescribes the existing zoraing and land use designations for your review. (See Exhibit "C", Applicant'� Narrative) 2. The applicant has revised the plan from seven (7) warehouse storage facilities to five (5) located on the back half of the subject site. (See attached 5 page site plan) . � 3. As the pe:rspective plan (lst pagP) indicates, the existing brick building � � will remain and tl�e older workshop will be removed. The rental trucks will � be parked near the entrance to Villa Ridge for advertisement purpos�s. (5ee page 2) , � . �� _. _ _ " ' � .� , _. . , _,. _ ,.. ; , �_ , . . . �. . . . �I STAFF REPORT `� A:GENDA 5,2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 Page 2 4. Page 3 addresses the drainage and grading plan on the southern portion �, of the site. This is not a detailed plan and, therefore, further technical r� engineeririg design will need to be submitted to the Public Works Director d, for approval prior to the issuance of Building Permi,ts. �� , � �I� 5. Tl�e fifth page of the Plan shows that three of the five (5) warehous� buildings ; will be two stor.i�es high. The Plan also indicates that the parking spaces � and landscape areas exceed Code requirements. 6. Northwest Testing has been hired by the applicant to evaluate the soiZs s condition of the site as requested at the January 22nd meeting. The report ; addresses the n�eed to stabiliza the warehQUSe foundationa in certain �' areas. Pages 2 and 3 0:� the report descri.bes the existing fil.l material ��, and suggests construction methods to support building foundations. �� 7. �Ir. Currie, �he Public Works Director, has reviewed this report and finds �� that it is accurate, and no substantial adverse conclition exists if the f' applicant constructs the building pads as indiaated in this report. � ;i He also requests that a condition be placed on the approval of this application � that the Building Department �Director inspect the soils rehabilitatson and compaction work prior ta issuance of Building Permits: 8. Access to and from the sit� will be off Villa Ridge (a frontage road that parallels Pacific Highway) . The site is just sauth of the nartYiern ingres�/.e�gress to Vi11a Ridge Road off of Pacific Highway.: This lessens '� the direct impact on Pacific Highway. Vi11a Ridge is the jurisdict:ion of the State Highway Depaxtment. �� 9. Sewer and water are on the site and have ample capacity for the proposed use. ' �,+I' � II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDING5: � 1. The proposed use is compatible and the applicant has pointed out (at the January 22nd hearing) and Staff agrees that the subjeet property location lends itself to this type of operation and it will not adversely aff�ct th� traffia circulation or the surroundi.ng properties. 2. Villa Ridge Drive requires some paving and sidewalk improve�nts. �; r STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2 � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 Page 3 l' 3. The proposed use is in compliance with the land use designatzon of tkxe y, Comprehensive Plan and is an approved Conditional Use in the C°5 Zone. �`�' �. 4. Building on the sensitive lands areas is possible if proper procedure is � followed. Therefore, the City 5taff must work closely with the applicant to ' insure that this is accomplished. �;'� f'� �. III. STAFF RECOI�MENDATION: E Staff recommends approval of the General Plan and Program with the following 'll conditions: �'I� l. A11 street improvements made to Villa Ridge Road sha11 be approved b,y the �" Oregon Department of Transportation, Bill Geibel, and the Tigard tl ]Public Works Director. �;,'I 2. This projeet must receive Site Desictn Rievieri�r approval by Staff prior to �� issuance of Bizilding Permits. ;, 3. That the a licant receive written a �`' pp pproval from the Building Department and Public Works Department confirming that the grading plans, site drainage, �; and soils eonditions are appropr.ia;te for �.onstruction pxior to issuance of Btxilding Pex�mits. 4. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and i�spections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. � � 5. No changes wi11 be made to approved plans or specifications unless fo�mal application is made to the appropriate City Department and changes are ap�roved by that Depa�tment. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 6, All existing or :pro osed utilities shall be laced under ro t 4� A p g und. S reet �, lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. � � 7. No Building Pex�mit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty (20) � day appeal period fram the date af approval. � 8. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. Prepared by Ken Se y, Approved by Aldie . ard, Ass iate City Planner Plann g Director vmc �' . I 7,_ . , _ , ,, . < , «; _ r. . _ _. _ _ _ _ .I,t � ' . �..�.a.>`�i`'+'i'i4. . �'�: � . . , �x+r.y C."r^� ' . .. • . . J ,J .• GI�� 1�� e� �. P.o. saX�3as� t�.��`�3 i°� A f 12420 S.W.Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 E'ebruary 1, 1980 Mr. Keith V�nEtten 8816 SE Foster Road Por�.land, Oregon 57266 YZeference: U°HAUL COMPANY OF OREGON, Conditional Use CU 26-79 Dear Mr. VanEtten: Please be acivised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their meetang of January 22, 1980, approve3 yaur request for a conditional. use permit for �e � U-HauY Rental-Storage aoncept for this site, with rhe concla�ion the applicant return with detail.ed soils tests and plan5 showi.ng how they inter�d to handle the sensitive lands, tog�ther with the Qther eleven StaEE Recommendar.ians applicable to �anc3itional Use Permit CU 26-79 as follows: 1. That the Ci.ty Council approvss the zone ordinance amendment to Chapter 18.32 allowing warehouse storage as a condita.onal use. If the amendment ��- is denied, the appraval of the use of warehousinq will be prohibit,ed. (Please note the above was passed on November 26, 1979 under Ordirean.ae Number 79-103.) 2. That �Y�e applican� receiv�e site design approval. 3. That stree� improvements an Vill.a Ridge be made to the approval of the State Highway and the City's Public Works Department grior to issuance o� Building Pexmi.ts. 4. That the, applicant aband�n plans to build in the sensitive lands a�a or recei�2 Special Use Permits prior to issuance of Building Perm.its. 5. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon - ' this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been caxri.ed out by the appropriate depaztmente 6. N'o changes will be made to app r�ved p lans or specifications unless formal � a�plication xs made to the appropriate �ity r�epartmenc and changes are , approved by that Department. Application for changes will be made in writing a;nd shall include applicable drawings. 7. Grada.ng Plans on aIl public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved �; by the Public Works Direatox prior to commencement of wark. C ✓ � �_ ,1 • , Page 2 • 8. Public wa�er sexviGe and sa.*�itary service sha1.1 be installed �o this site � ��,�. prior to �he issuance of a Bu.i.lding gerxRi.t, 9. A13. e:ci.sting or pzoposec3 utilities sha11 be glaced undarground. St�e� lighting instzllations shall be apprc�ved by the Puh].ic Works Direc�or. � 10. No Building Fermit s?�all be issued until the, expiratican of the twenty (20) c3ay� appeal period from the date of approval_ ' • 11. Imp.�ovements may be bonded prior to issuance vP Building Pezmits. The conc�itional use permit shall expire in ane y�ar from the da�e of approval, if the use has not begun and continua:l progress toward a,ts full operation is not in evidence. If we can be of £urther assistance, please do not hesitate to contac� this o.ffice at 639-4I71.. ' Sincerely, �� '._.. ,� Ken Selby „ Associate City Plannex 4 ��: KSvmc Action of the Planning Commi.ssion is final unless iiotification of appeal to the City Coun�il is filed with•the Ga.ty Reccarder.within twenty (20) days of receipt of.�this ackno�,rled�ement letter. � � Z'his ackn.owledgement must be signed and retuTCned to th� City o� Tigarct, k'lanning I7epa,�ttnento Failure to return thi.s ackno�ledgemen� wil.l resalt �,n na £urther act.i.on on this projec�. with regaxds fio issuance of Bu�.lding Pexmi.ts or engineering a,�proval. Signature (Contact/Applicant) �t� • Siy-r►ature (Owner) Aate �'" � II � ;: • ____�_ .._..._ ; . , , .�. ., . ��<,.��-�'��y3 � � �, . ST.�F'F c`2F.PORT AGENDr� 5.4 TIGA.RD PL��NING CO�L�LtSSION January 8, 1980 - 7:30 pm Fowler Ju.�►ior High - Lecture Room 10865 S6V Walnut St. , Tigard ' DOCKE'�: CONDITIONAI, USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) e�PPLLGANT: U-Hi+,UT, COME'ANY OF OREGON OWtQER: Thomas J. & Laurie S. Reid 8816 SE Foster Road 11552 SW Pacitic Highway � Portland, Oregon 97266 Tiqard, Oseqon 97223 APPLICATIOIV DATE: November 19, 1979 ' LOCATION � SITE: 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax MaQ I.Sl 36DA, �ax T,ot 900) REQUEST; For a Conditional Use to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on � 3.51 acre parcel zoned C-3 '"Gener�l Commercial". PREVIOUS ACTION: . On June 20, 1978, the Planning Commission approved a condi.tional use request by. Western Oregon Marine to operate a retail boat sales/repair business and outside ��`— storage on the subject site with conditions. (See Exhibit "A") �, I. E'ZNDINGS OF FACT: 1. 'I"he site is desic�nated on the NPO #4 Plan as Fiighway Commercial an� currently zoned C-3 General Commercial. 2. The applicant requests a Conditional Use (see attached narrative) permit to opera�e�a U-Haul Vehicle re�ta]. facility with storage in aec.ordance with Section 18.28.020 (5) of the Tigard Municipal Code Pexmi.ttiz�g Autou�obile, ' boat and trailer sal.es; and in accordance with Section 18.12.030 Authorizatian of Simi7.ar Uses. 3. The applicant proposes to construct seven (7) warehouse storage fac3,lities on the back, half of the subject site. (See attached site plans) 4, On January 28, 1980, the City Council will consider the approval of a zone ordinance amendment to 5ection 18.28 and 18.36 which will al.].ow warehouse facili.tiES far starage in the C°3 and C-5 zones. 5. '�he site is currently occupied by two buildings totali.ng approxi.mately 9000 sc�uare feet. The alder shop building will be removed. The southern one-�third of the lot drop� off sharpl.y in excess of 25� into a • natural drainage w a y an the edg� of Red Rock Creek. ' ' I � i I .. _ _ _ . � �1Y'_.'. . . . . . '. � .. . .... . ... .. �. .. . :..; . .. .. ._ . ,. . /_-�: � • � , � / , STAFF REI'OFtT/AGENDA So4 � TIGARD PLANNING CUMMTSSION • CU 26-79 3anuary 8, 1980 �, Page 2 ` �`" 6. Surrounding pxaperty �o the west is Marlt 50 Machinery; to the narth and acxoss Pacific Highway is the Fred M�yer Shopp,inc� Center; to the eas� Rasmussen's C'hevron 5ervice; and ta the south fi.he O.E.Ao aomplex. � 7. Access to and from �he site would be on Vi7:1a Ri�lqe (a frontage road th�t parallels Pacifia Highway) . The site is appr�ximat��.y midway between th,e north and south egress of Villa Ridge with Pacific Highway, whicYx Iessens the impact on �raffic entering the frontage road or attempting to merge. in.t� the Pacific Highway flow. 8. Ov�er the last several years a transit�ian has �aken �J.ace in t.�.e type o� business that had previousl.y acaupied sites al.ong the �rontage zoad. What before was essentially �n. industrial].y oriented mixture of uses is now undergoing a change to eommercial retail. The praposed use would be in keeping wifih fihis trenc�, as well as meetirig the objectives of the Community Plan as it pertains to site acaessibility and minimizing the i.nher.ent conflict between the safe, rapid movement of thr.ough traftic and shopper traftzc on rt�a.jc�z streets, II. CONCLU5IONARY FINDINGS: I� y 1. The prDposed use s,�oulci be compati.ble with surrounding land uses and not represent � a significant increase aver the tratfic generated by the previous busi.ness on , the site. '..,� 2. Villa Ridge Drive requires some paving and side�aalk improvements. i 3. The appTicant has poi.nted out (in narrata.ve dated November 12, 1979) and staff,a�rees that �he subject property location lends itsel� to this type o� operation and i� will no� advexsely affect the traffic circulation or the surrounding p r�perties. 4. Froper Yar�dscaping will screen and �nhance �he groperty. S. The �+roPos�cl use is in compl.iance with the land use designa�.ion of �he Qatpr�ensive Plan an d is a similar use ta the Conditional Use allowed in the G°3 zone if Council ado�ts Section 18.28 Revision. f. '�here are �wo i.ssues inwlved in this agplication� One is the approval to operate a ren�.a]. vehicle �usiness with warehouse storage and the second is the proposed construction in asensitive lands area. nue to delayed studies, the applicant was unable to prepare the necessary information required in Section's 18.57.06t7 (B) and (C) of the 7Cigard Municipal Code �o praperly address this issue. �herefare, ch� �p�rl�ea�-�t �eYU�s�s that the :pecwal. IJse Permit bs stbmitted tahrough ttAe staff at a later date, �.~ � � . ` w ' y \ � � , � STAFF REPOP.Tf'�GENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLADINIIVG COtM�IISSION Januar� 8, 1980 CG 26-79 Page 3 III. STAE'F RECOMI�IENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use T�equest subject to the fo].lowing ', conditinns: I . 1. fiha� the City Council app rc�ves the zone nrdinance amendment to Chapter 18.32 allowing warehouse storage as a Conditi�anal Use. S£ the amendment is denied, the approva� of the use �f warehousing will be prohibited.� ,��„�� -, .� ? �+ - o o�J � r ll.z.�� 2. That the applicant receive� sit� design approva].. 3. That street improvements on Villa Ridge be made to �he approval of the State Fiighway and th� City's Public Wozks departments pric�r to issuance of Buildinq '�` Permi.ts. ' 4. That fihe applicant abaiidon plans to bua.ld in the sensitive lands area or receive Special Use Per.nits prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5• No Occ•�ancy Pe�m.i.�s shall be issued until aI1. condi�ions placed uporx this c'.�veZooneat by t:�e Ci.ty of Tigard hava been satistied and 3,-�snectians ` v2rz�ying rhis have been �axriP�3 o�aC bv t�►e aporn±�ria�e departm?nt_ �� ,.. �, No ch�nges wil], be �ade �a app=ov�d plans or specificatiens. unl�ss formal application is ma�e �o �he app��e��iata G;.ty department and changes �re aporoved by that dec�azta�nt. A�,plication f�r cinanc�es wi11 be tnaa.� in � writirtg and sha11 include applica_ble drawings. i ' 7. GzaciAC�_„plans an aIl cu�alic xight-eF-ways shall be submi.�ted and agp�o�e� . by the Public Wqrks Director p�ior to cvmmancement o£ �aork. 8. Public water sez-v�i�e a.nd sanitarr service shall be install.ed to �his 9i�e prior to ti�e issuance n£ a 3uilding Perzni�.. 9. A,11 ex�sting or proposed utilities sha11 be plac�d unc;ergroun8. Street lighting instaZlations shall be appzvved by the pt�lic Works Director. 10. �Ir� Building Per.nit sha11 be issued until the e�iration of the twe�ty c3ay appeal period from the da�e of a�groval. ' Z�• Im.provemants may be bonded prior to issuance of HuiZdinq Permits. ' l�r�pa.red by ICen Selby, Ap,proved by Al i owardY Associate C' Planner P1 Director � vmc 1/3/80 � : _-_._-� , .. .�, � , �Xl�-�y� "�' ; ' j � �,�� Thamas ConsultYr�g Engin�ers, Incs � �� Structural Engineers and Planners � �"' � '* 102ll S.W, Barbur Blvd. �! Suite 210 A ��.. � t' Portland, Or. 97219 � ,� �' r. (503)245�4055 £' ' O Y — , �; � � �' � . . � . . � . ' � F'. ,� �� v � ` ��arch 5 193�� t� , �+ � . s, z ?�Ir. Alr.lie rlo;�rard � r,; Cit;� of Ti��,r�:l � }; � 12420 SaTaT. rrlain � �', `rirarci, Ore�on 97223 � ` �; Atfie�ntion: ?�Ir. �.en Selb;r ��'� �� Dear ��Ir. Se11.�,y; �;; �; �; `ro assist in t;:e r�x°ea.:ntatioz� of �. ?,en�r��l ��e°rela>>ear.en� r�l�tn and proar�.rn to the Pl�ni�in;; Cos,lr,1?ssion, I �:� suas,ii�Vin:; the '` !. att�ched narrative �� s�tisfy one or ;,r�ur requirei;lentC i:or � ;oet•itionin�. �' �'. r � �lhe zollo�•rin; requ:�re!��nts h�ve �een ai.:�an��le:. �z� �011.o�;rs, � rn�ardin; Sec�tion 1i .5��,03�: �. ) A�nr�y�1 h�� '�c�ei7 ;r��i��.e�l i'or an <�,men�3meni: t�o the z�nin; !�a�7 to a (P-�) r�lan,ze,�l �evel��;�e�sent �iati�ict . b-1 an�l b-2. ) A�^� on tn� r�I�zn;� �FOr t�h:is �:zY.�mit,tal. "`:�. �' ii . r; b'-3. ) In licu o:� a. minirnur.l o:� ten �crcenr Z��nci�aaapin� �; o��ex° the .�nt�ii e �ieveloner�ent, it i� rie�ire;ra tha� � a ai.�tcen �er�ent covera,r;2 c�:C fih.e: �rontal mnvi�;; �� Cf..'T1tCZ° c'1..i7.� CI1:3]J�.�,V area �E.' �Orta^l�?:,^°:.� �S r��ore u.T)TJ1"J�'�ri�_te . �� ' F' k '.�'ize entii�e rewr ar.ea cf th� si te is neerle�� .:.� rent�l sto�a^e �n�i � � � QCCG��,�"ia .�.Tl�i �:�IOtll.�l l�e �urroun�e�._1 :�n�� seci,re�d. Y�,,r ^n �:i~ht� a.00�. � f concreti ��.nC�t 1i1Ci, L'IT°Ct,l;?rl�: lY'Oil S4'GUT`j.i�I t�Ic.11 CO?'iStY'UCt�.OT1. �l'i1C3 ` , � froilt area o� the �ite h;..� << r�ore imme�:ii.�.fe i;�l�ac� an t'�c � neir'I1�01^ti10Q�] �.rt�:l � «reater nrecEn�t:�,-� �l-.nan a. r��:t�liz��^rl �o� �,1�� to�::7. � f ^OTl� �i.�:`t?:'.L 1•IC7U�.`'1 �"(' j.?�. �.c1.iZr'ISC3p7C; � �l�fll i �'!0:.11.!'� �l.irlr;'!•if' t0 i.?i�1,�I^1�:.7.?'.1,1tC�."�`' � si�cte�n n�rc^n�:., bcin��; co�ltrollecl 1�;;r �.rea x�r-:�=,uirer...:.�i::; for t:h�� rio��i.n�~ � ec�uipme�.t, :3i^��1<<t, ar.-i service. � , . � , , � � y . + e . 1 �,^ d-1 . ) A-L, ar�: in the >>lans �Y, is in �ne ;�l�.ns J-L, are in• �ne ol:�.ns � ' ,�� (il-P) �.re in tt�:� s_i.�e p].�.ri persnective and in tne �l�n� (The o�tler sub-rer��ii�ement� of this ��c�ct9.o�z t��ere n�t � annlicab�.e) m c�-2. ) Go�zls and qb,jryct:i�res. U�-ri�"1-.11l. l.0• O� �Z`E3!';Oi7 1X]�E.'11�`1„r, t0 @St:1?.�:)�.1.^rl ,'. `.`!f�].� rl@@'_Ic�� ?iiOVl.t1r' �n,:i stora,?e an�nit,y in the i�nr�ediate Ti.?�1rri ar!�:�, �•:?�ich �ri?1 nres�nt an annropriately cornm�xnicative im��;e of :;e�vicc �nc1. fi�:,ness to boi.h �he ir�m�diate nei?hb�rhooei of thw sit� �.n�� t�o t?ze <�i�c:-i.ter co:nmuni•tv. 'lhe intended facilit,y c•vould imT�rc�ve on the e;cfi�!1�a i.i�e oi t�ie ":�ronert,y � de,cribed as `I'a,c Lot: ;; 900, ;�7aahin�;ton Coulit�T ��„ussor� ii=�� ;;= 1�1.�;7h, � �Nhich at �he r�re,�ent: time is a ;aarine sales �n�� rex�air iacility locate�i at 11552 S.?�I. Pacific ih�rt�. " " lhe imnrovenent i�v�lves tha leveloper��ent c�z" �avin��;, si�e!��:zl��, i landscapin?, and buildin;; rernodelin�; the e.tist�.n�; structure in�:o a movinr; cgnt�r and ac��lin� �ive addi.tional si.rucfitz.res f'or rel�terl � househ�ld stora;P rentals. . A U-?-i�ul nlovin? and stara.;e cen�er is "a �e�.�vic� cor 7ovin�; �eo�le anrl their househol�l artiele�", ancl in�t:ends ta re:�1.ect �:� eo:-�r�.lpte line o:c mova.n; eni�i�,r,lex�t; ?:ii�h ror�i�I].f;1E.'1'1�c'lT°V aa.-:�� an�a services inaludin;: ��tcl:in? c�^..rtons, t��e � te;�oi�ar�t �tor�.ne oi iZOUSeho7.•:t . �� "" ?oocls, hitch sal�s an�i ins't�ll:�.tion, an:l �:L i;lovin,�; re7.��.ec1 <*asoline �,,, source. ��iith �he �.cae,�t�nc� in �rincinlP o�' t1�e ;,re7.imin�r�r cl��r�Zo�e��ent -�1an, 1hFre remains i�rir,►irilv tiie i��ue ai co;.�,trizc�tion in the �ensi�rive l�.nd� ar.e�: o-L �he �ite; con�truction in tiii:� �rea a�eq�.iir�U Z'21TtOVc1]. �Il� ;i01^i 111�* O�' �112'.i c?C@ iil�.�;el.'1.c1�.S :I:Oi^ .St,Y`UCiI.Zi�.�. �1�.�.. i ?�.C1Stli1? ZT1C1 i7T`O!'?bSC!'1 r�T'cl.G,�.^: c.'l"fll� iZI';zinz�;� �T! �•Ci'`."�lS Oi: t�1�? ��ro�.�c�se�:l con�truction are in t'�e �1 Ans. • ' .: " ;'izor,��.s Con�ultin�:; ,n�;ineers, t;zc . , '�^� T�re��arer� � �i�,c� pl�n .xn:l ; site nlzn nei^snectiti•t�, li-I:4iz1 iz^_, .r�t�.i.n��l �ao��h Coi;�,:.��.;~�: ��a.rnor:��,i��i1, �' ,�L�r5 S. �. I,a.'•_e P,o�l�i, '�,il!��:.u�:ie, �rc-;on; to cora,�i,��,-u �. iinzl �i..trv��v ancl a c3ra.ina7e rlan an� �rofi�c, ��ncl '�;orth=:r�,fi `�e;��in; L��.t�. , o�' �117 _d, :�ii�si,�:�i.�ni , s'ortl��z,�, �Jr^e,_;on; no;t r�i^occecain-, ,:�r:i.th :�oil t��:�t:;. '.��i�.:�'.: �•rou io�^ �rour �t�t�l1"�1.0!1 to ti1i.:� -�e�itian. :=>incerel�r, ��.......,.. �.,��. �:�----�-- . Lanr� '.•ii�itien r'trclzi�tect;ux��_�J. :�e^i�;i�er �'. r�'.�/,�.�. I , � � _ _- _- _ _ __ __ _ _ _ � � � _ . - —-,— r�16/i1�,U2 LN 7nJ4�) �OM 00 f( � li FC9 fA�11Q,j6�S1V H • u°!!!ul4�RfbYlE�[(//�lYYAfYl.NA�9'w�/�7Y!/. � MS'Y/��ruii.viiyt!/Y1hYlL///YlM19�07Y/qt(dm'iNlff[/b✓t/d4000IrH �/!/IONi/L)blG7�1PA�Ib7///!L(!!4!!/!�[rf � .. l�ld4/� �� • 1Ljts0i 1�R 9ia �� 'ti � � , O '� I � �� . � � � y t; � U q r. c�� . � � . [ `r•.. �� n �h=�� — Qw3N�s'3 00��• i 9��_ .r.._�....._ s. . � . ' \ /�� v t�l � . ��a. .d,j._�o �..... .� ...��,...J . � " a ., � � � • N . N _ Q �j n IY Irf � � , . . O � � . °� • .� 1� p C . . i � liirtbs � ♦ I�lNOH 4 C b �� , .,J•,:,,;! �/ i�ii9%ti/,�/. �: f lY��f�.ri•Y,:i/�.. �f.:/,:'!%'i?.%:'�r. �-i:i6/ii%%i%lc•,.. .��/,//.'!9'�l: 'i, :Ot: .r� f•�•s•,:z. •:x�::�,,:.•::a:,%::e: c•z:<• ;.l;>�.£s.�i;i�f''ry'ni.?�s: � i•i�s .:. : ..:ii ,i�: '�=� 3dtd i/f 1 ,� • �'�_ ti �� f N - Q� ,�� drF �1 �� ,�{ � " . a . • Rbar n"_ p�n RFete " s� � 9v • _` QD Q r�g� . .. s�p �.-- /T' _., .__ �_ � __ .�a.�' _._. __ __ -� _� _ �� .� � 7, _ . o� � � � --� d � u , M • _ � � � � . . , � " _ O pl �n � �� h� n �. . �� . '- lj , • � v: : _ �� '.��- �� ........ � �� ... �..� `_ � _ , : .. �I _ ��— . . �? 1E a� � � - � ,A�� .�.� �. �. ..� ��._ - .� .�N t: �. � _ a 4e � � _.� �_ _ / -:''+ i) 1�� 3� +�� ES'9lf 1q„OY,92eV9 �� .� .. . � v j � _ �'«y ' � To O j�1 . . � �O c) � �� 0 ^,y. P !,r O�� \ h':1► �,n � • . �� _� 0^1 . . ' � '. �&L'At�" !['9 Q 2 -- F i A h� ' _ ""� � ' • �p�'�., �O' . � •T t � ( ' ' ' . . ee ac.c�N � . .. : �-I P `�.�+' - 'a �"_ � a . � ' ' : � -- � '� ��, � � '_ p N r. �� _ - , '.� _ � ��'��i♦ o� �°q, :.'�� ` c`e , -,� _.._ _ ,,�� w _ � _ ,_...r• _ - _._. ' _ _ �� h`� ��g• :• ce ; o a ^ „ * - ^t . ' ,_� f-. v. O�a =_ eh . `:{p,�ti � e « _ �n �r��z � ! . -° _ �,� r . - ,�, — ^ u �1 .�� '_�� w _.. _._.� r � , -= fi . tioti� � � �• ' � � s z - � � v r � '� ty U i� rr+i O v ^t O rc � ' r � 's: � r�,� O ti - O R �D 0 �7 n T �r u � - t1!� K� R r '�1 K� o �a x � .ti �t � � �..�j ..�. N ,� ' �i ~ � � lfj� ... 'i��ss�,��fis-�f�s�''�-�7t�,!tC '°��"�:i,;:ui . :. -;...p;M1!°`::°.. ; �•.�•GZ� ' "1 -r � `,.• Y iii. .ki..�. a:f= .Gi '•Aa��r:... . .i4�{:i s.ir�. . _Y •.a3a�. �/� � OL USZ � p�`i t r � ,t�t `� �/1 ~�� i� ,I� _ V'� � ,d,� •� « � p � �; r o � �--•y.__ _�_._...__�. __...�__. �.---�.,.�.._ , t -� - _ _.,_.,.. . . ., . . I _ _ _ _ _ _ �l , - � i i. S'PAFF REPORT � AGENDA 5.3 � '' � March 18, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. § TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon � , E 4 k DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE ZCPD 1-80 (Holman Project) � � APPLICANT: TUALATIN DEVEL�PMENT CO. , INC. 04VNER: Tax Lot 100 TDC � 15300 SW 116th Ave. Tax Lot 301, Harvey Knauss r Tigard, Oregon 97223 9830 SW IJ.urham Rd. G Tigard, Oregon 97223 ; , APPLICATION � DATE: January 3, 198� � LOCATION i STTE: 9830 SW Durham Road and the property adjacent east (Wash. Co. , Tax Map 2S1 14B, Tax Lots 301 and 100) I 1 REQUEST: For a zone map amendment with Planned Development District from Washington County RS-1 to City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family � Residential Planned Development" zone on a 40.14 acre parcel. I PREVIOUS , ACTION: It was the opinion of the Planning Commission that this � application would be significantly changed if acquisition of additional land to th� west became a reality. The Staff presented testimony that this was the case, and reguested a tabling to resolve the issue, The Planning Commission tabled this item on February 5, 1980. 2. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The subject site has three land use designations; from SW Durham. Road, south approximately 200 feet is designated as R-5 "Single Family" with minimum 5,000 square foot lots 'having no more than six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. The mic3dle portion is designated R-7 with a minimum 7,500 square feet per lot having no more than four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. The southern portion is designed as R-20 with 20,000 squ�re fioot lots having no more than two dwelling units per gross acre. ' 2. In all three designations, the comprehensive plan intends that development have single family characterisi:ics. Hov,rever, the upper portion may be attached single family style to acCO�date � the housing implementation plan requirement. 3. The proposed plan indiaates that the northwestern por�ion of land adjacent to Picks' Landing Subdivision be a minimum of ' �: 5,000 square foot lots. This mi.nimum standard is located in the appropriate P.-5 Zone in accordance with the Coinprehensive Plan. (See page 10 of applicant's narrative.) .�.�•.. __ _ ___ STAFF REPORT - Page 2 � AGENDA 5.3 TIGARD PLANNING GOMMI5STON March 18, 1,980 ZCpD 1-80 4. Page 11 of the proqram states that the plan is based on an overall density to the underlying Zone of R-7 E7,500 square feet) . However, the applicant is see king a variation to the underlying zone lot sizes for the majority of the parcel. On page 12, the applicant states that the attached units will have a minimum of 3,?_00 square foot lots with a range from 750 square feet to 2,50Q for living area. This is far below the minimum established in the Comprehensive Plari and the Tigard Code. 5. The southern portion of the site which is identified on the Comprehensive Plan to ba (2) dwelling units per gross acre has been identified on the plan to be open spaae. Applicant proposes approximately 5.6 acres per open space. A majority of this open space is the floodplain, and is unusable for use by the residents of the development. (See page ].0 of the applicant's narrative) , 6, On page 11 and 12, the density calculation by the applicant indicates a total number of 178 dwelling units. �he applicant arrived at this figure using an unbuildable portion factor of 7.2 acres (page 11) . This factor does not include the 5.2 acres contributed to open �: space which is not to be included into the buildable acreage. Secondly, the applicant states that more dwelling vnits are possible due to the limited number of persons per dwelling unit based on dwelling type. 7. Staff density calculations for the subject site are as follows: 40.14 gross acres less 20� (public improvements) = 32.12 less 7.2 (unbuildable) = 24.92 less 5,2 ac.res for open space = 19.72 x 43,560 = 859,003.20 : 7,500 (underlying zone) = 114.53 dwelling units + 20� additional ( fo r open space dedication) = 137.43 total dwelling units allowed. NOTE: No additional dwelling units should be allouted based on the decreased persons per household since it is impossi.bl� to guarantee that this will in £act be the case. 8. Sanitary sewer and water availability are addressed on Page 7. 9. The internal streets in the plan will cons3.st of fifty (50' ) and thirty (30') feet of rights-of-way with twentyfour (24' ) ,feet of paving dnd no parking. Off-street parking will be provided. (see pages 3 through 17 of program) . The proposed thrity (30') foot right-of-way (see page 16) is twenty (20') feet less than the City's local street standard requirement nf fifty (50') feet. 10. Access to the subject site i:s proposed to be directly aff SW Durham �, Road on the northeastern area of Tax I,ot 100. (See page 14) _ _ . � } . �`; ,.: E. �: STAFF REPORT - Page 3 �` �`; ,,, AGENDA 5.3 4; TIGARD PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT �`; March 18, 1980 ;; ZCPD 1-80 �'; h'I Y3 11. On page 17, the applicant states that there is no present acoess �[' onto SW Durham Road. Staff's review of the proposed development !� finds that access to SW Durham is available to the west through !'� Serena Court onto SW Durham Road. (5ee page 14.) 1,' i'. i;; t{ II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: v' f�i 1. The intent and poliey of the Comprehensive Plan (NPO #6) envisions that lands south of SW Durham are to be develaped to retain a single ' �� family characteristic, (Policy #6, Page 4) . This policy was created { r to protect development in sensitive lands areas: continue the single j;� fami.ly home style, and provide a consistency of family household type in conjunction with� the vicinity of Tigard High, and Durham `� Elementary Schools. The proposed "single" living area of 750 square �, feet and age restriction would violate the natur�, intent and G' character of the area. `�� ;: 2. The applicant declares tk�at the plan is to buil.d within the R-7 �� underlying zone. However, none of the 178 lots are above 5,000 �<:I square feet. The Planned Developmen� District Ordinance gives �a � the Planning Coznmission pexmission ta grant deviations from the �� za�ne standards. The Staff fee�.s that the requested deviation of � lot szzes are far below the minimum standard, and'therefore, the �? request is inappropriate. � i 3. The appliaant's density calculations are misl.eading, and assumes the �,"; possibility of fifty-five (55) additioraal dwelling units based an �.; restriction of persons per dwelling. The total allowable density ��: proposed by the applicant is forty-one (41) dwelling units above �:: the Staff's findings. Even if age or family type members aould be �;�. restrioted, this type of housing characteristic is contrary to the �': Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. 4. The internal fifty (50') foot ra.ght-of-way streets with no parking �� is acceptable with the off street parking areas. However, the is thirty (30' ) foot right-of-way streets are not acceptable. Z'he �` twenty (20' ) foot decrease places an on-going hardship on utility �;9 construction, maintenance and access as we11 as limiting future 1-�� , street widening, if necessary. Also, the narrow streets increase �'' fire safety hazards. (See attached letter from TRP'PD) . �" z �;,: 5. The applicant's proposal to enter the project directly off SW ;;; Durham Road would be adverse to the "limited access" policy of the City. The access is not the only means to enter the project x at present. Hz- � �� t� i t- STAFF REPOkT - Page 4 AGENDA 5.3 �� TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� March 18, 1980 ZCPD 1-80 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial ot the Holman Project Zone Change f�r the following reasons: 1. T2irough the guise of the Planned Development Ordinance, the applicant is attempting to sell the plan as a standard R-7 Zone, when in iact it is a high density apartment-like devel.opment, having living areas as minimal as 750 square fe�t. 2. The attempt to narrow the standard street width from fifty (5D') feet to thirty (30') feet is not tn create aesthetic features, but to crowd living units into the buildable area to reach a higher density number. 3. Chapter 18.56.010 describes the purpose of the Planned Development District. Based on the key intent of this Ordinance, the Staff frnds that the applicant has not proven the project's capability to nneet the Planned DPVelopment District intent. Plaaing conditions on this proposal in an attempt to bring this request into conformance with the Planned Development concept would not be appropriate s:ince the �. applic�nt has not designed a reasonable facsimilie of an R-7 Zone� to begin with. Report Px�epared By: Ken y Approved By: Alc3i ard Ass ate City Planner P1an g Director : �� Z ' f i i I �. > STI�FF F2EPORT AGENDA 5.4 � TIGARD PLANNING CGMMISSION � March 18, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Juni�r High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZCPD 3-£30 (Park 217 Business Center, Ref: ZC 36-77) APPLIC[�NT: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANX OWNER: 12onald G. More and Ronald E. (�omez 7�10 SW Fir Loop C/O Western Ftacquet Club Tigard, OR 97223 8785 SW Bvtn-Hlsdale Hwy. Portland, OR 97225 APPL�CATIOIV DATE; February 28, 19$0 ; , STTE i LOCATION• 150 f eet south of Pacific Hi hwa on the east side of SW Garden Place i . g Y � and 572 feet south of Pacific Highwa.y on the east side of 5W Hall � � Blvd. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101 and 120U) o { REQUEST: For a ma.jor. change of the General Plan and Program Review ot the Park 217 Plan t o maintain the same City of Tigard C-3PD "General Commercial Planned Development" and M-3PD "Light Industrial Planned Development" Zones on a total area of 20.6 acres. PREVTOUS ACTION: On I�cember 4, 1979, the .Planniny Commission approved a request by the app�.icant to extend the Planned Development Designation on the subject site with conditions. � (See Exhibit "A") 4 On November 27,, 1978, the City Council approved a Zone Map Amendment (Ordinance � No. 78-77) to the owners for the subject site with conditions. (See Exhibit "B°') y I. FINDINGS OF FACTe � 1. The site is designated "General Commercial" on the northern portion of the � site and "Light Tndustrial" on the southern portion on the NPO #5 Plan and is � curre�tly zoned Cm3 "General Commercxal" and M-3 "�ight Industrial Planned � Development"o i i 2a The applicant is requesting approval of - major changes in the previously j approved C-3/M-3PD Action on the subject site in accordance with Section i 18.56.150 of the Tigard Munioipal Cade. � �-` ,. .., . . .. ,�.... - - �. :, ., , _ _ _ , . ; STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 ZCPD 3-80 �� tI'iIGARU PLANNING COMMISSTON March 1$, 1980 Page 2 3. Applieable policies from the NE�O #5 P1an are as follows: � Policy 20: In the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of highway � i access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, businesses on j Pacific Highway should be clustered and share common parking facilities anc� �' driveways. As new development occurs, the number of access points should � I raot exceed the number necessary for pro1�er on-site traf�ic circulation, � and, where possibleo should be combined with access to adjacent businesses, i ! Polic 25: Limit L-he aniount of commercial develapmen•t to occur in the j Y industrial area, allowing only some growth of existing retail and service � I commercial in the area. � � 4. '1"he Plan will be developed in two (2) phases. The initial phase will encompass i the development of a13. access ways, utility services and the construction of j the southeasterly four structures withi.n the site (Buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6) . � Construction starts for Phase I of this project are scheduled for mid-1980 1 with anticipated completion by early 1981. j 1 Phase I.I of the project is designated as the northerly �tructures and the westerly structures on the site (Buildings 1, 2, 7, and 8) . It is anticipated ° that the structures wi11 be built during the latter part of 1981 and the early �. part of 1982. (See attached report) 5. The site slopes from the north to the south, dropping from approximately 210 feet at Pacific Highway to 150 feet at the south property line. Considerable earth fill has taken place on the upper portion of the site, resulting in a tier effect. The sauthern portion of the site is relatively flat and contains a pond. Red Rock Creek, which flows out af the northeast and passes under � Highway 217, continues through the southeast portion �f the parcel and serves as the primary source of water for the pond. Crystal Lake, which was formerly in the southeastern corner of the site, has been graded over. i, 6. 'I'he site is surrounded on the east by Highway 217; to the south by industrial � development and single family residential (southwest) ; to the west and � across Hall Boulevard are apartments; and to the north retail stores, a service F' statinn and Pacifac Highway. � � 7. The revised Plan reflects a change in the buildins� dimensions; location, p and uses. The a�plicant proposes to construct eight (8) buildings ranging } f.rom 22,000 to 46,400 square feet with ma�ci.mum height of two stories. � Portions of building #3 and #4 are in the 100 year floodplain. (As shown in � figure 1 of the report) . i t � � j � I \ I � . . ... . . . . . . . .. .. . , _:- rw.,..;.. .... . ... . ... . . . . . .... . .. - � STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 ZCPD 3-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 � Page 3 8. The applicant has submitted a Special Use Permit with this application �ro fill in th� floodplain and to locate permanent structures in the floodplain. (See Exhibit "D") The attached memorandum dated March 10, 1980, by the Public Works Director addresses the floodplain issue and proposed external street classification. 9. A traffic impact study for the site has been conducted by Carl Buttke, P.E. Consulting Engineer and has been reviewed with the Oregon Depar..tmen�'�. of Transportation. Mr. Buttke's conclusions were the following: A. A left turn refuge on Ha11 Boulevard should be provided (this wauld require no parking on one side of the street) and � restriping of Ha3�1 Boulevard. . The 5tate concurs with Mr. Buttke's recommendation but feelsno parking should be provided on both sides of Hall Boulevard from Pacific Highway to ICnoll Street. B. That left turns be prohibited from Garden Plar.e ta the westbound Pacific Highway traffic. C. That when Phase II is developed, a third access be provided from the � southeastern corner of the parcel onto Hunziker Street, - An access agreement between the subject parcel and the abutting parcels to the south for aacess/egress onto Hunziker Street is recorded with the deeds of those parcels. The agreement pravides for a 60 faot easement � that would be dedicated for street right-of-way purposes at such time as it is deemed necessary by the County or City. A portion of this ease- ment between the Tigard Distribution Center and Partex has been paved but is without curbs and sidewalks. 10. SW Garden Place is a City street with a 40 foot right-of-way from Pacific Highway south to the southern property line of Tax Lot 1100. 7.'he applicant proposes to vacate the southern portion of the street. 11. All utilities are on or adjacent to the site. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINL?INGS: 1. The proposed business is in accordance with the existing C-3/M-3 Zoning and land use designation. 2. Staff concurs with Mr. Buttke's report that a left turn refuge on Hall Boulevard is necessary and that a left turn off of SW Garden Place onto Pacific Highway be prohibited. However, present evaluation of traffic movement on SW Hall Boulevard does not indicate the need for a southern access to SW Hunziker as Mr. Buttke suggests. �: �. . _ _ ....� ..... . . . . . ... .. .. .. . .. . . . ._ . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . ... .... � I E; '' i ,i I '! t -, ' j. , : ''I �; f STA�F REPORT � AGENDA 5.4 (. �I� ZCPD 3-80 �, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION March 18, 1980 Page 4 ; ; � ,. 3. Staff proposes that the road off SW Hall Boulevard be a public street and connect with SW Garden Place to the north. Both streets should have no less than 50 feet of right-of-way witYi collector street standard paving thickness £or heavy truck traffic. The remaining right-of-way of SW Garden Place should be vacated from the southern end of the intersection with Ha11 Boulevard. (See Exhibit "C") . 4. Encroachment in floodplain arnas can be properly managed through the cooperation o f the applicant with rhe City's Public Works Directqr. III. STAFE' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the major change request for the C-3/M-3PD with the following conditions: 1e All development on this site must receive Site Desig:•>, Review approval i �rior i:o the commencement of any work. �:' ;, 2. That a dedicated street built to commerci�l street standards as diotated by � the p�lic Works Director be provided through the property from Hall Boulevard � to Pacific Highway via Garden Place and that the appliaant petition to the ,' City Council to vacate the remaining portion of SW Garden Place. � 3. That a left turn refuge lane, to include striping,be providefl along the fiall �:� Boulevard frontage and that a half street improvement (to include curbs and ;!;';; sidewalks) also be provided along the Hall Boulevard frontage. All improvements " � to be subject to the .Oregon Department of Transporation. `I; ,.:;' 4. That no parking be aZlowed along Hall Boulevard from Pacific Highway to j''' SW Knoll Drive. 2'his wi11 require a no �arking ordinance via City Council i;;-(�, �:; Action. r;� �;!: 5. That no le.ft turns occur from Garden Place into the westbound Pacific Highway �'; traffic and that approach street improvements to Garden Place from Pacific Aighway be provided per the Qregon Depsrtm�nt of Transportation's requir.ements. ��`� ��:`: 6. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this developmeflt by the City of Tigard hav� been satisfied and inspections verifying i-his have been cax,ried out by the approgriate department. ��, �-, �• No changes wi].1 be made to apgroved plans or specifications unless formal f' application i� made to the appropriate Ci.ty department and changes are �t,; approved by that department. Applica�ion for ahanges will be made in � ;. writing and shall include appla.cable drawings. +;;:;� � �'.�� ' t �'� I.'�; F �, �,`a i.'. ;.: ;:o.. .� . � ;;: �; .k ' S, STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 ZCPD 3-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMM.ISSION » '±� March 18, 1980 '' Page 5 �r ��:. 8• Grading plans and construction plans on �11 publ.ic right-qf-ways shall be sinbma.tted ;: and appraved by the Public Workg Director pxiox� to commencement of wosk. ;. 9• Public water se rvice and sanitary service shall be installed to this �,f, site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. �,µ: 10. A7.1 existing or proposec3 utilities shall be placed underground. Street �`� lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Directar. ��; 11. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day �'�; appeal period from the date of appro�val. �; �! 1Z• Im�rovements may be bonded prior ta issuance of Buildinq Permits. �! 4') 13. That i:he applicant satisfy a11 requirements placed on this project especially F, in the area of' the f•loodplain by the Public Works Director and Building �:: � Inspector. ��' 14. Applicant to provzde soils analysis of the site for the Public Works �` Director's approyal when the construction plans for the public improvements are submitted., �' Prepared by Ken Se b , Appr.oved by A1 i award, �� Assaci City Planner F1 i g Directoz �} � vmc � �' E �� ' � n ` �• ^"� • � ��'� �� I r � / � � ::`i•�°::�.:r:.�:,� '1 �,^J I � � _ 'w '� C��l7C'!� � m-..��. T'�,_•� � �' O-G�`- � . �� . � , � �i>C.�-�� .� F � ��'� � - I�"� �F' �'"I�� . v � , � P.O. Sox 23397 j` 12420 S.W. Main !� � � �igard,Oregon 97223 RECEIVED � I . DEC191979 � I December 10, 1979 CITY OF TIGARD � � �(�v. d�/�3'v'1�_ .,,s.��-�-•L C�G c,�-�--�..��e�...--. �}�=�- {�`.,,� ,��..� �7� � f b�� S VU j�.L�fLvr•��v�0-�__ 1 �( (�=='�-�.�'(�-c� Ck'�.s„-• Y7:1�S ruce osford C/• LL RQW COMPANY' 7110 i Loa i. � Ta.gard, O n 72 Reference: Zone Change ZC 36-77, Park 217 Business Center t; Dear Mr. Hosford: � . Please be advised that the T.igard Planning Cornmi.ssion at their �eg�u.lar II meeting of December 4, 1979, approved your request to ex+_end a Planned ,; Development District on 20.75 acres off SW Garden Place ].5Q feet south of �!: ' Pacific Highway. � � § �, The agprovai is subject to the followin q conditions: �� 1. That a11 conditians of Ordinance 78�-77 be met. !' �� '� 2. No Accupancy Permits shall be issued until all conclitions placed j; 'ttpon this developmeat by the City of Tigard have been satisPied and ¢" inspectians verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate �;! department. �,�', 3. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifica�ions unless '= formal appTication is made to the appropriate City department an,d i' changes are approved bx that department. Agplication for changes will !� be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. t- �; 4. Public water service and sans.tary service sha1.1 be installed. to �F this sita prior to the issuance of a Buildi.ng Pez�ai.t, � � 5. A1.1 existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installatians shall be approved by the Public Works ` � Director. ' t b, That the southeast portion of the site be landscaped to eliminate noise from traffic movement on the subject site. �;. ' . .., . _ .. ....... .. . _. . ._.... ,..... �._ . .... .. .. . .... _ .. .. G . .. . . ...._._ . _... . . ... ��.... . .. ,_.�:.... ... .__ . .. . ... . ._ . ....... .,. ._. . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . � . � . ' � , � �� . � ' �':��'� , ��. I �:i �, Page 2 �' ; t . ' i[ 7. '�'hat truck traffic between 7:00 p.m, and 7:00 a.m. to the site be `�y' ; prohibited. �' ` �`� I£ we can be of further assistance, please do no� hesitate to cox�tact this E: offic� at 639-4171. 1'' , � Sincerely, . �;'. , F: ;� ��<� , t� �! Ken Sel.k�y ;j Associa�e Ci..ty' 1?].anner �� 's; KSvsnc �� !i NOTE; This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, i� Planning Department. �'ailure to �eturn tha,s aaknowl.edgement wi7.1. " �•esult �,n no fur�her actian c�n, tlais project with regards to issuance � y o uilding Permits or engineering approval. i� ;, i; ' , � ,� .�_��. -- - _ �.,.��_i�� f�� Signatu licant Date i J _�� >`� f l7 i x.� Signature, Owner Date Special Nc�te: Action of �he Planning C��ni.ssion is final unless notifir_a�ion o� appeal to �Y►e City Council is fi].ed with the City Record�r wa.thin twenty (20) days of the Planning Commi.ssic�n's ac�ion. . � ,� � � ` � • , L..M�... ,� � , _ _._ _ _ __ � • � l f `�'�� r/ ��(/��/� �. R .1w� ti i."'� 'l � � ��v✓�' • 4�'`�. . � � � ��c ,p .. • ` �. �. . . . ��x �1;Y �,r TIC��2L7 � . _ P.o. Box 233s7 12�20 S.W. Main � ' ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 _ • �Y<: �. _ Nover��ber 30, 1978 Ranald G. Moore SVestern Racquet Club 1023 Lund La�e Qswego, Oregon 97034 RE: ZC 36-7? Dear 1�!(r, bloore: Enclosed is a copy of Ordinance No. ?8-77 which was approved b� the Tigard City Council at their regular meetzng of November 27, I�78. Your request was approved with the follotiving cor�di.tions as set forth in the enclosed ordinance. I . That alI buildings, building locations, landscaping, ped- estrian access, vehicular access to parking areas (�o include driveway widths) �,nd signing be subject to design review. � 2. That a dedicated street, buiZt to �commercial street standards with 36 feet of pavement, 5 foot sid�walks on one side of the �,y street (location of sidecvalks to b� de�termined during desi�n r�view) be providecl through the propertq from FIall Blvd. to Pacific Highway via G�.rdei� Place and th� applicant pe- tition to the Czty Cauncil to vacate the remainir�g portion of S.W. Garden Place. • 3. That,:�a. left turn refuge lane, �o include striping be provided along the Hall Blvd. frontage and that a half street improve- ment (�o include curbs and sidewalks)also be provided along the Hall Blvd. �rontage. .A17. improvements �o be subject to State Highway vepartment approval . 4. That no parking be allowed al.ong Hall Blvd. �rom Pacific Hwy. to SW°•Knoll Drive. ThiS will require a no parkin; orc�in�.nce via City Council acti.on. , 5. That no left turn occur �rom Garden Place into the westbound Pacific Highway traffic anc� that approach street impxovem�nts to Garden P1ace from Pacific Highway be provided per State Aighc�ay Department requirements. 6. That the constructian and site drainaJe plans with retention pond illustration be approved by the Enganeering and Builciing Departments prior tn issu�,nce of permits. 7, That soil campaction tests and soil analysis report of the site bE received and approved bq the Engineering and Building Dept . prior to plan check approval (especially in rega.rd to develop- ment af the flood plain) . 8. If the Planning Commi.ssion choases to loca�� the �.lignment on � fIunziker at a future date, then a street pluo must be Iocated at the end of Hunzi.ker on �he property line. Also, public road ._ .. � . . .. _..___..._ .__.�_. _,., __,_ ._,,.....�. _ �_...�__ ..._.. .. . .... ,...,. � ...., .. ,. _. _ ._.. ,,. _. _ : � . , age 2 _ ZC 36-77 � - � • � �' � , t" �� . �� . � � � . ' from Hall �lvd. through to Hunziker alignment should be stand- • ard to local ao3lector 50 feet right-of--�c�ay wa.th 34 feet of paving. �� 9. Due to the heavy vehicle use, the cross section vie�r of the r r onsite roads must be improved to 8" - 3� and 3/4•' asphalt (com- �� mercial street standard) . {�::- ` 10. The proposed servi�e allep must be marked "one way" traf.fic . ��' 11. Rennov� the proposed medium An the east side of the egress area � from the service alley. 12. Service a11ey must be a minimtuv o� 34 feet wide, paved witY� egress and access bein� 34 f eet. � � 13. If improvemen�t for parking Iot on flond plain is approved, the j' elevation must not be altered. Improvement �c� "Flood Plain � ;� District Standards" must be r�et prior to building department � issuance a� permits. �; 14 . Driveway aprons must be shown as approved by Engineering �� Department prior to final plat approv�,l. `�' , 15. Ac�ess road fxom 9�N must be dedicated �o the city with min- !{ imum avin af 34 f eet. P g ;; ,; i� %f you have any questions regarding this matt�r, please feel free �o !' contact me or the Planning vepar�mento � ,; Si.ncerely, ' � � � . , ori�artig j . City Recorder` DH/pjr . En c 1. t,�,., NOTE: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City o� � Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this lett�er. Failure to return thi� acknowledgment may result in actimn by the City of Tigard. . . .,•„� . I hereby acknowledge this letter daeumen�ing the action of �he Tigard City Council. I have received and rEad this l�tter and I agx�ee to the decision her� documented and to abide by any �erms �.nd/�x c,ondi.tions atl;ached. . � �� , _. Signature cc: Lakeside Develapment Coo � r � "�7 �% � Dat e` r-----�—=- � �� I ___ _.._ - -. ..,.._ .. . . _ _ _. ,, rt _ , - � _ �,YIf r� • v�N � � � ;I . � � , � �� llld�� •�/,r �C t� `��Cj��%plll��llllll ' �,50 ; `�` "///i�/��//�/ ' ..•• � SE E M AP �G bo , ' :z.zi ':, IS I 216CC ,ii��id�id�dr�iiiiiii � `�36`y``e \ � � � 3 ; .- 01 A-I ,.� � �P�iiiiiii�i�'°� � � � � a► ` soi � �'��IIII��A(I� ,a � � � , ° "9 ''o IIIINI�II� . � o.se a� I '� , � � `' /��/�� .'"`'9� a � � - 1fg2.69 I ��ll��1� \ 0 5 77^32 w I � 400 � ° zo`•"' I � � /' �� IIIIy�IIIIIIIIII�IrIIIIII N IZO�C. � � " V � �' P�� u-.V �� 4 bZ Z9 ' a \ � �� '�'�°�%/((//�///// o� �� °_ \ � $i , � � � ` �� 300 , 8 ry°� — ' �"°` N \ �BSAc.` �' - s es�stw` i<�.oa� �� 401 'u '� 0 ' . 1 � ?..BSAr, !u ao 35 \� , !� \ tl \� � I � I � • z � ' 6Q , � t�`; .a . . . � � '�.�-'�S' '$� _ � , k' IS�,•. � °�\\ . � -, . , � o'.j S d� �. ` „� 5 .�-'°��f ', - c � � �r zao � ; \ '�5 36 •�sa.o5 .�- � �� , "�„�, � �, � ,� °' ao E ! �( s� 3 29 Ae. �s NO3 `Z 4'A � � _ — - _ _ _ ' "- "` -_. -'_'",__„�, - 'c:.'. _ . '. . w •- - .-!--�c�_t�'��y.�„-w�• :•.w e _—_'-'.�.—. - - __.,.�.-.._,......< . . .. ._-°___-.--- _�" .----�� „ ^ ....•.:.••_•�`,�,�� _ _ ,�. . ._^-. . . : ... .�,,, .. -c ......... .....�._,..,�, y � � PPRO.1� �x $I� ;O" .\• f��,�NpN � i � �� SEC. CORNER I o �Io \ � � 2 � 1�. ol 4 , � � �^ i �,. �o f� \ � \ � ' 1� � � i \ Zp9�.� .. . .`\ � _ �o �' �� !i" � � 69°�a�' � ��. �� w � , � 5 . , .N.. � j IN � w , � ' � ' � � g�es°ok�'pz Q�, 80Q `�f '' , ' � Z 47 7 70. � � /.49 Ar. ,�� , , �I �� , �s :�' `'" �� ; . � , r �� 700 � .^-,o � �� 4Q' ,•, �. � �1 N �� ' N Z� i \ O' %� ��+ .. _`- �• , O. �'• � .23 A c � �� ` �� , o. '�. + @'3� � 19. ...- opdE 363.�_� � �N:. ° ` �y ��f' 7. /� � � � N 8'S � O\ I � � � ! .. ._ . � -��r � T � � � - ' 801 � ,� , oo� a� i � y� '• �oo � a. 4d �G �`'y ^ 22At. � � \: I� m' �,%� M o��/.67Ac. �C.S.No.l?_8671 � , L, �� i ' � �e 10 ��:,� 149.7 .°�e `� (C.$.NO 10858)� .� I� s es° = p \ 1� I r �js � 4 583°a4�W � ..+-••: j ��f� f6 995.6 Z79.5 � �''''`' � ,°, .,9At:p � �. �� I _ � �__, fi„'c, �, • zos.z i�oa,w ��i.---^� � �.iicn. �"j � + 5 8�°04� LBp.00 . �1�� .,�-�'- I 1\ � �� N � �!� �: 1` - i�i� � \' _ .'�C. \.. . o . . \ � I f d�� 1,�1'`�' `�° � \ , w ��°� � � � '2.Z9 c. • J��p' ' i � . �^a'�� \ y 4! \ � � O N I^01'. 21 N ` �.. \ ., � � -I �^_�: `�.,�- - �`� ; ' ! p4. i IQO� � � , �._ �--- � � ��1 � n !� V t/ m ' I j� �.•A ��p�� J, 5 , � N � ,..��S� � I�� O � ` � � � � N �,� / O P y� � _ � �� ' . � ,/ . .Z � ! i �n �� 3 � " � ' �, `'� , . � � � �� ;) �c-;L�� iii�'�� ' , ' . > /' i � ip /' / ' i ' . • . . .'N . s�//i 1 � 60 ��i �•.� - -. ///S � �/% .. T�6ARD �� , .. s� ' . ' � � - . � ��! . , . � ia Z INlfl4�,ji t�Cl'4� �'�.,..: B�. � . 1 • . O.E t ��1�+«.... �M �. • � . ,--- __._ _.----Y__".`_ "`. �..»�'._.ti "'�{':`' y�.' _ .,1 -`i f _I. _. .. ...__„. ___:,......._ � ,1 �,ri��,r c '� , ,��i�i�` � � �nllll��l��lldlllll�'� go ,� 'l'� _ — ,/ ��°i .., A�zzr � SEE NIAP 9 j' ^ — — �bo , � (S 1 3fi�� L .�36 �0 � A � �y�' � � C• � , 3��Q'� � 1 � ' � i � , . _ � i 0 0 6B Ac. I _ °� o I I � i�� Z�'g2.B9` ' �-'(" gZw � � .� pe �. g 77" � it ,�p�. " \\ I , I Z I \ u \ � '�1' i \ -� i '�, _ ,,tt i . ��' �� / � ��. 300 � . ° _ — � — � \ /.69Ac. � �'�, s es°stw zaaoo� � 9� , � \N ' I,1 - N I � ��° � � �t �' � . `, �\,� - �` �� . I � s � , ., sc �. \ � � . _ i � ,,,� r 200 � c � 3.2s Aa _ ?� ._� .,�.._...,�:._ '�-N � - ._�:___..�.__�_._ ---- :....�—-=--..-,..-.-....�---�------�—r- I \.. \0 1 --- /---�-�_--.•_._-j� -� i �� P � / + V I \ � �� - �� `hO �`I � � �, O� Y� I � , \\ �� , �. ,/ ni k. I /� 209'� � � �• � , 9o5�E � }a� �� I � 5 6 � � ;� N W� _ _ _ _ I � �� . a EAST i �' UI ? �`, e o o ' `�y/ �' . _� ' ..� �� L49 Ap. � � - \ � � �, s �^ � . � „ \ � � ��1 �1�' Mo� ti. � e �.. ._'� `�N Z� I � � �• %�� f �� Z . 1r .1 p i t� .pO� 'r�. � �.. 4 � �. / � �� r �� O:l O\ I �/�� _ �� _ 202� / P'� . \J r t^ D¢�P� � \ ',C N o\p��(��'l� � )qll�j. � ` 5�9V� �_ � }� \ \�o � 1 f \ �.J �� (G.S.No 10850)� /�O /��' i;MP�� \\ �g59•� _,__� ` � 0 ./� ��#t�� 1 � °�� ► �� 179.�� J ��-'`�' �'`• A�'a �8ti�. � ' r 203.26, � 7 I � � �'.` ].IIGh. �� i ��t1;.3 � N � CP,Y4TA� L � ,y�' 4 ��. _ � �U�. ✓� I 2 00 ... I i � q�iT' W �'" �4.72 Ac. ! ' 0�. • 21P.�..,,.8 \ N � •, A j �� ' � �� ! ��.�� #�'� . �s . �-.. '�� y,��p�� , �,:.._..._._—...— � a ,, ,, , , : 7 `` .� . ��+,. 'i � S Tjo�5= �1 4 . . � P � . � -..�,h,` 1 j�q J 2g E . . - . �. �� y , i�� — — _; � r � � � � . o . . , � . I 4 h ` , � �: ' � , 1. \ ;. ' , � TIGARD Ra � ,. � ' ,:�� :,i�� y��nirra�anti�°cn�s. ` , . . . �, ...,... '..G�...,W.� � . : . , .`1 .r.. . . �J!?'fnl�rr...1�_e: � - - , �� . nage two ' °"'' Revised 7/23/79 i� ;�� " k � C � F-,�6�-►T3�Y' n D„ � SPECIAI. USE PER'�IIT ' � � �. 1 T�me Of flll: Selected native soil and imported fill. � � si 2,704 cubic yards fill to 3,244 cubic yards excavation net increase � Cuhic yards of fill:in flood plain storaQe. -- Area of site flood plain to be occunied by fill: loi,s76 sq. f� ? (Sq. ft. (Fill)/Sq.Ft. (Site) x 100 = �5 � of site to be in Flood Plain lol,s�5 Flood Plain I56a��8 filled. Distance o� fill from stre3m's edge: Horizontal Distance l�o Ft. VertiCal Dro�: ,5 �:t, �� (see drawings SD4 and SDS) TVne of bank to be installed: Compacted native soil protected by landscape planting and grass planting. � Net change in storage capacity of flood nlain resulting from fill 14,47e Cu.Ft. � (increase an storage cap.) ' . y Wi11 the fill increase the flood crest or modify the flo�o of floodwaters? i � �Y Yes No xxx If so, �dhat k�ill the quantitativc effects be? (Attach a sheet fnr explanation.) Structures FXistin� strueture(s)in flood �lain: None � � !ie ig�t Ft. !'lidth Ft. � }4 3 Distance from stream's edge: Florizontal Distance F� �� Vertical Ltrop F1 s Proposed structure (s) in floc�d plain xes (two) 1 Flei�ht 1.4 1/2 Ft. Width 80' and l00' Ft f Distance from stream's edge: Horizontal Distance 255 Ft ' Vertical Drop 2 Ft 4 Distance between existing and pronosed structure (nearest noint) 120 F� , �9i11 the structure increase the flood crest or modify the £low of flood waters? Yes No� If so, what will the quantitative effects be? (Attach a sheet for explanation) . ` �, Will the �ro sed structure be desi ° , Po gned to withstand the destYUCtion effects of a flood without significant damage? (Attach a sheet �to expl�i.n specifics ) Building will be raised out of flood plain. +�, �' Page three , � � . � SF'ECIAL US� PER'�tIT � v Storage ''lhat tyne of materials are to be stored? nonc � ��olwne/c{uantity of material (s) � Distance of sto.rage from st;re�'s edge. E-Iorizontal Ft Vertical Dro� Ft ni'stance �f storage f'ror� neares�C building� Ft ?Vill. the rk�terial be anchored to nrevent movemen� :in the event oE a flood? Yes i tow? No !Yhy Not? Attac a s eet f.or e.ml�nation. Type of screenin,s�, for storage i , ;:. f,`� � —,�,-.-_,_,_ , .. _ , . � MEMORANDUM �h T0; Planning De;partment EROM: Public Works Department ' SUBJECTs Review of Park 217 Business Center Developmen� (Flood Plain T'reatment) DATE; March 10, 1980 The applicant has made a thora�xgh and detailed Sc�ay of the flood plain area and the develo ment on the flood lain. the effects of P P In addition Co reviewing the t1Summary of Conclusions and Findings"(with whicYa I concur) I have visited the site �with the engineer and feel that he has an understanding of the public concerns in this sensitive area and has addressed them quite adequately. One other concern is the question of the pr�liminary subdivisian and the access to the site. I feel very stzongly that the access to this site on both H:ighway 99 west and SW Hall Blvd. should reflect a clear appearance of what i.s public and what is private. I would like to s�e the access from SW Hall Blvd. to SW Garden Place bec�me a public tt►rough way. ��: An alternative would b� to make all the access private. � :�., � k � ! ` jj � �" f �', STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 y; �M1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ;' March 18, 1.9F30 i� FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM � 1Q865 S W Walnut St. , Tigard, Oregon r'' i� ,., � `,. � DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE, CU 2-80 (Bruneau's Carpet & Furni,ture C3,eaners) !;; APPLICANT: NLike Heuvelhorst OWNER: Same 16139 SW Waluga I Lake Oswego, OR 97034 'I APPLZCATION DATE: February 8, 1980 , SITE " 4.1 LOCATION: 12551 SW Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lot 800) "� REQUEST: For a Conditional Use to operate a furniture and carpet c3eaning business in a C-3M, "Main Street Cammercial" Zone on a .22 acre F`.' parcel. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: r 1. The subject site is zoned and designated C-3M "Main Street Commercial" on `;, �. the NPO #1 Plan. ��,I �? 2. The applicant is requesting pern�ission to operate a carpet and. furniture cleaning facility in accordance with Chapter '18.30,020 (9) of the Tigard l� Municipal Code. (See Exhibit "A") . � `'',I 3. The following policies are from the NPO #1 Plan addressing busi.ness establish- ' ments in the Downtown Ma.in Street area: 'c1l �� Policy 22, page 29; Policy 23, page 31; and Palicy 24, page 33. �I!, A11 policies speak to the need to provide local cozn�unity services and products. �'I The intent is to redevelop the Downtown Commercial area in a manner which ,�� wi,ll ben�fit the businessman and neighborhood, i:� i�� r', 4. The business will be one of four within the exis�ing brick and wood framed � buitding. The business consist of a delicatessen, ch.ildrens' apparel, clothing �i:l alterations with a fabric store. The surrounding land uses consist of Main �'� i Street Pet Clinic and Penrose Realty to the west, Valley Auto Parts to the �� south, an old tin building and Fanno Creek to the east, and the Pacific �;I Hi ghway ove rpas� to the north, f� �`i' 5. There are eight public parking spaces available in front of the owner's }' building for the four businesses, 2'he Tigard Municipal Code requires a i;� minimum of foux off-street parking spaces per business. In this case, �;� sixteen parking spaces are required. HowEVer, when this building and others �?'i around it were constructed, off-street parking was not enforcable. �' �`�I �;i �I'� i� � ; r; ��. �,,; . � ` �;; STAFF REPORT ;;' AGENDA 5.5 #�. TIGARD PLANNING COMMT.SSION �, '' March 18,� 19$0 Page 2 6. Water and sanitary sewer service is on the site with ample capacity for the �' purposed business use. 7. Potential growth in the area: An eleven acre parcel located southwest of the ! subjeat site is proposed to be improved for a G. I. Joe's Store with other businesses. This massive development will have a great impact on Main Street traffic circulation and need for parking. 'I'he con,struction is expected to begin around June 1980. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDTNGS: 1. The requested use is in keeping with the conclity.onal uses in the C-3M Zone and d�es not contradict the aommunity sho,pping center intent of the NPO #1 Plan. 2. The structure of the building and floor plan appears to be adequate. However, if this request is permitted, the owner must receive written approval from the Tualatin Rural Fire District Marshall and Building Tnspector to insure state building and fire code compliance. i 3. There appears to be no physical means to the owner to comply with the off- � street parking requirements. Since this building was constructed prior to 1970, ' it qualifies for the "grandfa�cher" clause allowing its present structural `; use to continue as is. The parking requirements place a hardship on the owner from no fault of his own. This is a problem for nearly every business '`� ' on Main Street. Staff is presently working with an architect/planning consultant "�`� to investigate Downtnwn re-develnpment plans to deal with the G. I. Joe's �i r,,, development, revised traffic circulation, public parking, community service �` center, and p ark. This plan hopes to p ropose a solution to the limited parking �''" �;.; problem on Main Street, i..I ;:; 4. Staff feels that the Bruneau's Carpet and Furniture Cleaners operation will ; ` not severely add to the insufficient parking problem. �`� �'�: t . III. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: j;;� �(,1 Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use request subject to the following ',;�;� condition: r,:' � i`-� k'� 1. That the owner receive written approval from the Tualatin Rural Fire District j;, Marshall and City of Tigard building inspector for state code requirement �;>;; � , compliance prior to commencement of Bruneau's Carpet and Furniture Cleaning ¢:. business operation. C',�: F'� ; , Prepared by Ken lby, Approved by Aldi o rd, �.;� As iate City Planner Planning Director �' (s� t;',`:i, VIIlC E' � �� ;�,i �;'`,� �:Y� a � . . . . _ . . . . . . . . � .. ��. ,..nw..:l.,. L�� . .... .... ....... ... . ........ . :... . -. - e_ _ . ...,... ..�„� . . :.. ..::�.. ..:...' , . , .:,......, . .. ._....... . . �,. ..: .� .,,:..�. ..,...... ._...�..... . .._--. . . . . . . - . . . �#�,1 f,:l �. . � � .. . . . �I,'a�' i �' �z' J' ar' ��,,�' I�MURANDUM � � t , ��'. T0: �'IGARD PLANP�NG COMMISSIC3N r FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT r�' ��' SCJBJECT: ZbI� TEXT AMENDI�NT, ZOA :�$0 (CITY OF TIGARD� AGENDA I'I,'EM 5.6a OF THE MARCFI 18, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETZNG �' Ci � � . � � �� !. ' Attached is a draft of a graposed amen,dment to Section �8.2� of the Ti.gard 4'�. Municipal Codea The amendment as intended to bring the zoning code into �: canformance with the Comgrehensi�re Plan. Gertain areas in the City are �; designated for development to a density of twenty (20) and £orty (40) � �`, multifamilg dwelling units per gross acre. Guidelines �should k�e developed ��`' to insure that cer�.ain standards for this development density are met. � Z'he lot sequirements, buildxng heights, setbaeks, and open space xequi.re�nts �`, r`: for each of the three muiti£amily zones represent the sg�c.ificati.ons f necessary to produce sa�'� anc3 �fficient developsaen�. s�a.ndardS. Staff xs ' zequesting a change in the A-2 classification to A-12 whicla clearly s'tates �'� r;� the density as 12 units per graas acre. �=:: � : Please review, comment, and be prepared to discuss these changes so that s ' Staff can prepare a presentation for the City Council as soo�� as possible. �� Ple�se consult your Muniaipal Cade Book Section 18.24 to compare the f' �� xisting ordinance with the pro�osed. ��; ' �sj�� FF i+� ; yl ..,,.� � €',�; . { s, ,�, . E; . �l � ' �.,�� . , r, �,,s�;� ;�� ,:,., ,�. ,;��;. �. � �{�: , ��Yi � � ri �h� � Q � � I� 3 { � ��CS �� M� �'��•� . � . �""r, �� . � � ' . . �,�. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOIV ORAINANCE No. 80- AN URDIN.ANCE AMENDING �ERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18.24 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES, DEGLAZ�ING AN EMERGENCY AND P'TXTNG AN EFE'ECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has been found by the City that certain changes in Chapter 18.24 Mul.tifamily Residential Zones are appropriate relative to • implementation vf tl�e Tigard Housing Plan and Housing Implementation Plan and, WH�REA,S, changes i.n this section have been reviewed and approved by the Tiqazd Planning Commission and members af the seven (7) Neighborhood Planning Organizations wi.thin �the Urban Growth IIoundary, NOW� THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORQAINS AS FOLLOWS: 5ection 1: Chagter 18.24 Multifami.ly Residential 2anes (A-�2, A-Z0, and A-40X of the Tigard Munici�al Cods be amended to read as �ollowss a�EE �XHIBIT "A" A'�TACHED Sectinn 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary to the peace, health and safety of � the �ubl.i.c that the foregoing change in the City's xecords becoma �� effective, an emergency is hereby declared �o exist, and this ordinance shall �,, be effective upon its pa�sage by the Cauncil and �pproval. by the Mayor. � PASSED: By vote of all Council members present this i day of , 1980, a�ter �einc} read two times by iiumbei and ti.tle only. Recorder � City of Tigard � FlPPRQVED: Sy the Mayor this day of , I980. Mayor - City of Tigard � . Ordinance No. 80- 7AA 2-80 .....r , �. � —� _,*., _,� .. �.. . _ _. _ _. _ _ _. . _ _ EX@iIBTT A _ �', � . -, 4�'I }� . � 1, �• � � CHAP.TER 1$.24 �; MUI,TIFAMILX RESIDENTIAL ZONE � �; (A-12, A-2�0� A-40)* � � � � � �. ;. � �� SEGTIONS � • ;' 18.24.010 Permitted uses , 18.24.020 Condi:tional uses t�:. 18.24.021 Site design zeview �? 19.24.030 Lot requirements A-12 � . 18.24.040 Setback requirements ��; 18:24.05Q Buildinc� height ` S,i 18.24.060 Additional requirements 4�,' 18.24,OZ0 Usabl.e opez� space and 'recreati.an areas � '' 18.24.080 Lot requirements A-20 ' s;, 18.24,090 Setbaek requi.reiments 1�-20 �.' 18.24.I.00 Building height 1�-20 f;: 18.24.110 Ad@itional xequiremen�s A�20 � ;r ,. 18.24.111 Site �design review 18.24.I20 Usable open space and�xecreation areas `` �;' 18.24.13Q Lot requirements A-40 '�' 18.24.140 Se�.back r�quirements `�� 18.24.150 Building height y,�', 18.24.I60 Additional requi.rements M� 1�.2�.16I Site design rewiew r�� 18.24.170 Usable o,pen space and recreation areas �',� . . �,,! I:!`a ; tT;, • ,;:;, *For sign regulations, ses Section 16.36,030 of this Code �j � i;�?�' ��:: �:", . ��; : . ;,'s . ,,,., . t�� i'li: ;�i; s;< t; . � ��i pru t:� P'', ri;. �{,'J ��i; �i'� y�'; k',; �};�,j ;iS 2ai ��; �.:. �� ! � �� i. yi �:i 'i, k I8. 2s . 010--18.2a.021, � 4� 4. �; ,, Z$. 2�.010 ?�r:�?�te� usas. :Jo bui?di�g s�ruct�:r�s cr '� ?an� s::a_L r2 L15�C aac. zo �ui?�ir.g or s�=uC�L:E' sh�,11 �� ar- °�„ r` L .7 n a r �- r ' �- a ` (� �1 ;'c��..._ 2'_ ��.z..� E,.Iar�_C� C_ dLL@..c�CZ �,:� d�1... A-12� A-20� dlld' A-40 +. _��... ze�ne except fo� the follQwi.�.g uses: �. (�) � use p�rm�.tteci Gut�iqn� irt an R-5, R-7, R-Z0, R-20 ar k R-30 Zone; , i: (2� ?''NO �ami L;� �we I11.*!�s� (duplex) o� at�ached singl� �am�.ly; ,�; (3) :�partc��nt citi�ell?.ttr.15: townhouses; condomi.ni�ams; ; ;1 . � i:i I.8.2�.020 C�ndit?on�? u5°_S. Tn the A-12, .�1-20, and A-40 zones, the fo7.lowing uses and their ac�e�sory uses are permitted as �ondi- , t.1.0.^.3Z l>SCa ��Ji1!3I1 aU��iC�Y'I.ZE'? dr� I.Il dCCO?'Cu::C� 'v�i1�i'1 C;tag�@r'S �a ;2 �:�a �s . �z . . (I.) A conditiar.�I use �s per*�i,t��d �n an R�5, R-7, R-io ; R-20, or Ft-30 x,ane; • �� (2) Auditorium, exhibie.ion or pa�?ic asse*�bly raom; �� Q3) Go?` cours�, count�;,r CI.LI�e �riz�a�e clubs;health cl.ubs; ; (4) Lcdges �nd hratar��.I orcanizatians; (5) MQc�cal, �ental or_ other ��`�ssi.on��. o�Li.ce or s c1.i.:�i��: (6) �io::ile hor�a ��rk (::�ust be fivz ac�es or ncre a�d � mus� front an a r�a7ar artari�I _or � dis�ar.e� o° not I.e_� i tkan one nur!d*_-�d =e�t P�rith screening as ?r�s�r_tLJ prov�ced ! iz 5ec±�i�n I8 .I2.080) ; j �, ( 7) Any business, serv°iee, processing, s�oraqe ar dis- play essent?al or incider�tal to any permitted use in this ; zAne and__not canducted entirely within an enclosed buildinq. � 18.24.021 �ite design reviewe All development in the A-12 zone shall be �ubject to site design review. ••:;- . !�s � . 18.Z4.Q30--Z8.24.040 �:. i � � i , , 1 18 .24 .030 �,�t requir�:ments. In the �-12 �one the I.c�t �I'� �ec�uirements shall be as follows: • (Y) The maxi.mum Iak area shal.l be seven thousand square . eet. When used for multifamil residential ur oses th f e P P Y . minim�am lot area shall be as fo�iows: � ' F I� . j. Number o° Dwelling Units Sc;uaxe Feet per Dwelling Unit ; , � . . ��, Z 7,000 ' 2 �,000 '"� � 3 and up 3,630 . ;�� kj . . , ''I 1 (2) The minimum avezage Iot width shall. be sixty feet �; , except r�n a cul-de--sac where minimum width sha1.1 be sixty feet a� the building Ii.ne. `. (3) Buildings sha11 not �ecupy more fiha.n �he �oT.Iawing � j!. pzr�enta�� of �he Zot ara�s . i; ;, Number of Dwelling P�ercen�. of �afi. `r � (�rij,ts Coverage per Dwelling Unit r' . • • . ; � � 1 35� 2 and 3 40� 4 to 2Q 45$ Zl to 37 ��$ � 38 aar.� up . 55$ � - . � ,-'.:,;� . 18.2 4 o U 4 0 � Setback �eaui,remer�t�,. Except as may other-- � wise e providPd� in Snctivn 1.8 . 2. 00 , th� setbacks f�ar uses ; in the A-!2 �one shal]. be a� fallaws: �1) The front yard setback shall be a mini.�um of fi.wenty � feet .for a one story k,uilding, and would �,ncre�,se as the buil.d- �; �.ng '3aeiqht incrc��.ses : �'wo s�ories , thirty feet; (2) The side yard shall be a minimum of five feet for � one story, seven feet for one and on�-�ha1f stories , and ten � feet for tr�:� stori�s; � • (3) On �orner �a�s the setback shall. be twen:ty �eet on � any side facing a street other than an alley; • (�) The rear yard shall be �the same as side yards; (5) Wn�re buildings are grouped as ane project on ane � � ��act of land, the minimum distance between two build�ngs at � �.,�_ ..._..--�-....-�� . . . � . . . � .- �. .. •_ . _ . -- _ . . . . . ,.. _ . . .. ' ' .�." ' '• -,- . � Y8.24.�50--18.24.070 ' � any given point shall not be less than the sum af the required s ieie yard� co;nputed separatel.y for each building at that po.int. �„1>> ' 0 � 18. 24 .G50 Buildir_c� heighte �xcept as c�therwise pro- vided in Section 18 a I.2 .11Q, no building in the A�-12 zone sha1.I �xceed a height of two s�ories or thirty fee� whi.chever As . . lesse ?� , � I8.24. 06A AdditiQnal rec�uirements. Additional reguire- e - m nts applicabie in the A-12 zone include �but are not Iimited to the fotlawing: (1) O£f-street parking and loac3ing, see Chapter 18.60; � (2) Access anc3 egress, see Ch�.pter i8 .64e � (3) Apartrnent dwell.ing�, pro�rided that. anX commvn boundary between an A-�Z zone and any other resi.d�ntial aone exists shall be screened by a f`ence obscuring the sight o� normal adjacent pedestrian and vehicuiar traffic, the erection a� whzch shaZl be the gespansibzlity af the groper�y awner�I�i� i,n: th� A-�►2 zon�; see, also Section 1�. 1� �U80; (4) �ic�ns, aclve�t�.sin�g sigr�s �nd �iqz� �tructur�s sha�.1. �ae subject to �he eonditions, limi.tafiions, prohibi�,ions and requirements of Ta.�t1e 15, to whicl� particular_ re�erence �.s nbade; , � (5a Nu�,sances �rohi�it�d, • see Section 18a12,070. 18.24 .070 Usable open s ace az�d gecreation areaS_ Ar� auea or ar�as or usab e open space an recreatic�na gur-- poses sha�.l zae provided in mu.Itifamil� devel.opments. . 1� m�.ni- mum of.. t�ro hundred square fe�t of recreation area sha11 be prov'i.ded �ox each Qf the first twenty dw�lling units; two hundred fifty square feet for units twenty-ane �hrough tharty; �nd thre� hundred square f�et for each unit over �hi.�tx. 7�he surface area of recreation bu�.lc?ings, inc�udi.ng swimraing poals, mav be inc].udec3 in computing the minirnum size a� �.he area. R�creational. faei.lities shall be provided i.n keeping with, the need o.� the prospective tenants. Ftecreation ar�as shall, not, � be lacated in re�uired yards, parking or maneuvering areas. . " T�ble for Computing Mu�.tifamily dpen Space R�quirements � � i Dwelling Units Minimum Square Feet i — , 10 Z,000 � 20 4,OOQ ' 30 6,50a j 4Q 9 ,500 ' j 54 I2,500 °" '`� � � 60 15�500 �� ; j i � � , � i . . . . � � ... _ _._. _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _. . _ � • . � ,, } � 18.24.0$0 18.24.090 � i+ . �� il , . , i � �` � ;: �.: , . t � i 1.8 .24 .08.Q Z�ot reauireMents. In the A-3 zone the I,ot requirements shall be as foll.ows: � . (1) The maximti:zn Ir,t �3rea shal.l be �even thousand square feet. WY�en used for multifamily residential purposes the ; ' minimum lot area shall be accarding to the �ol.l.o�ring table: ' Nt�ez of Dwelling Units Square Feet per Dwelling Unit • . ;' 1 5,000 Z 3,630 3 and up 2,i78 . • . . . . ,'; (2) The rtinimum average Iot width shall be Si,xty £eet f except on a cu1.-de°sac whe=e minianum width shal.l. be sixtX geet at the building line. � (3) Bui�dinqs shall not occupy more t�.�.n the £c►T.Zow�.n.y ge�centagzsof the Zot ar�as: :r Numbe� of Dwell.ing Percez�t of L�� i iJriits Coverage �er Dwelling Unit �; ,}, . �� . � 1 3 5� �� 2 ant� 3 4Q� �:� 4 to 20 45$ r!� ' 21 ta 37 5�$ �; 3� and up � �S$ 11 , , �:;:'� ;�'- . ' , � ;� Ig,24.090 Setback requirements. Except as may otherwise be• + provided in Section 18.12.100, the setbac�CS fo� uses in the A-2� �� . , �;'� zone shall be as followsn ' . ' t'� �:; (1) The front yard setback sha21 be a minimum ot forty feet. �; (.2) The side yard shall be a minimum of ten fee�.. �`' �� ,; (3) On cornex lots the setback shall be twenty feet on the side �'�' . F,�i faca.ng� a street (other �than the �treet with the address) . t.; (4) Z'he rear yard shall be twenty feet. � ' (5) Where building� are grouped as one project on one tract of �a° i land, the minimum distance between two buildings at any given point . shall not be less than the sum of the required side yards computed sepaxately for each buiZda.ng at that point. �: �,�� :?; 4..;' ' �y j, i � �'�`��"..�� ,r;. �,Z+ 1.;.": . t';'f FF . �� f � F;5 I . . . _. . . . .. . . ._ _ .. � . .. � . . .. . .'. .. . . ...._ .... .. . . . . ls.z4.ioo is.24_i�o � . ;: , . , � �g•24 • loo Building height. Except as otherwise pro- ?': vided in Section 1�. I.2.1�0, no building in the R-ZO zone sha11 ` exceed a height O� four stories or sixty feet whichever is � less . ; '� .�� I8.24. �lo Additional requirements . A.dditiona]. requi.re- ments �.policanl.e in the A-2Qzane include but are nat I.imited i to the following: • �!. (1) Off-street parking and loading, see C�.apter IE.60; (2) Acc�ss ar�d egress, see Chapter I.8 .64; ` (3) Apar�ment dwellings, provided that any comznc�n � �oundary betweer� an A-20zone and any other residential aone exists stiall be screened by a gence obscuring the sight o£ normal adjacent , pedestrian an3 vehi.cular �raffic, the erection of which shall be the responsibility of the propert�r ownership in the A-20 aone; see al.so Section i8. I.2 .080; (4) aigns, advertising signs and sign structures �ha11 be subject to the conditions, I.imitations, prohibitions anr� requirements of TitLe 16, �o which particular reference i.s madeo (5 ) Nuisances prohibited, • see Sec�ian I.8 .I.2.07�. � �� 18.�4.111 �i.te design review, A1.I developr,ient �.n the A-20 2one sha1l be subjec� � site design review. I8.24 .12o IIsable o en spacQ and recreation areas. An area ar areas �or usa e ogen space an reczAatzonal pur- poses sk�all be pzov�ided in multifamil.y de�relopments. . A mini- �, , mum of two hund��d sc�uar.e feet of r�creat,ion area sha17. kae ; prov�ded �or each o� the first twenty clwelling uni�s; two � hundred f3£ty square feet for units twenty�-one �hz�ugh thirty; " � and th.ree hundred square fe�t £or each unit aver thirty. The 4: stxrfac� area of recreation buil.dings, :�ncluding swimming pools, and � rea�e�tian, halls ma� be included in computing the mi.nimum size af the area, Recreatiort�l facilities shall. he provided in k�eping wi�h �k�� . need •o�t the �raspective tenants. Recreation areas shall. nat be loe�ted in required yards, parking or maneuvering areas. � E'ormula for Camputing Cipen Space Requirements I?we].l�n� Units Minimum Square Feet Per Dwel.ing Unit 1 to 20 �00 (example: 20 D.U. x 200 = 4,000 sq. ft.) ° *�1 �0 30 2S0 (exampie; 30 D.U, x Z50 = 7,SQD sq. ft.) { 31 to --- 300 (example: 31 D.U, x 300 = 9,300 sq. �t.) ; *The recrr:ational and open space areas must be located Eor easy access by S� all residen�e. � . C f f i � ! � � .. �1 f5 P � f . •.........._..... .__ . . . . .. .r.. . . .... . . . .. . F " 18.24.130 18.24.140 �+`' I� .24 .13o Lvt reauirenents. In the A-4o zane �he Zot =aquirements shall be as follows: � {1) The maximum Iat area shall be t�ve thousand square E'eet. When txsed for muZtifamily residential pux°poses th� � minimum lat area shall be accor�inS to the fal.I.owiz�c� �Ga.ble s Y�tum�er of Dwelling Units Sc�uare Feet per Dwell.ing L1nit � '. 1. S i�od ' 2 3,630 3 and up ��Q$g • . . . i (2) The rnini.mum averzge Iot width sha17. �ae �i.xt� �eet except on a cul.-�A-sac whe_e minim.um �ridth shall. be �ixty ! �`eet at the building li.ne. � (3) �iuil.din�s shaZ]. not occupy zt�oxe �han �l�e �01.3.or,,r;;.nr i p�rc�n��ge�e�f the �.ot ar�a s: � I ; Number �= Awelling Pex�c�n� �� Q� ' �T111.t5 Cov��'�ge �er Darell.i.ng Unit - � � 1 35$ � 2 and 3 40$ • 4 to 20 4�$ Zl to 37 � 50� 38 �.nd up . � �5� � � � � � , 18.24. 1.�0 Setback requirem�nts. Except as may otherwise be provided in Section 18.12.I.00, the setbaeks far uses in the �-4Q , � � zone shall be as follows: ' . � � ' . �, (].) The front yard setback shall be a minimum o� Eorty Feet. � (2) fihe side yarc3 shall be a minamum of ten feet. � «) On cornes lots, the setback sha11 be twenty feet on the side facing a street (other than the street with the address) . - � (4) 2'he rear yard shall be twenty feet, ` (5) Where buildings are grouped as one piroject on. Qz�e �saa� of i land, the �i.nimum distance between two buildings at any given �oin� � sYtall not be l.ess than the suu� of the required side yards eompute3 � separately for each bu.i.lding at tha� point. ; i � i , ! � _ _ , ._ _ _ _ 1i1.2415�3_ 18.24.`1�'0.. ._ : O � �8.24150 Building hpi.c:�t. E�ccept as o�h�zwise pro- vi.de�; in 5_ction 18.12.11or nv building ir� the �- 4ozon� sh�Il. exceed a heic�ht o� four stories az sixty fe�t whicheve� �s less. • , ', . I8. 24.150 ' Add?tional re�uiremantse F�dditional reauire- � w tnents applicasl.e ia the r�-�o �zone inc3.ude but are not Ii.�ited to the f�ll.a�ving: (1) �ff-street parkin5 ancl Ioading, �e� Chapter I8.60; c2) Accsss and eg=ess, see Ch�pter I.8 .64; (3) Apart;Rent dwellings, prav�.ded that any comz�on bounciary between an A 40'znnp anc� any ather �esidenti.al xone exists �shall be screened by a fence obscurinq the sigh� of normal adjacent� pedes�rian and vehicular traL Ei.c, the erectian af wh�.c:� �h,�1.1 be the responsibil.ity Qf the �roperty awne.rshi.p i.n th� A- �o zone; see alsa Se�tion I8.1a .Q80; . (4) Signsp advertisinr� siqns and sign s�ructure� sha1.1 � be subjec� tc� the eondit,ians, limitativns, pxohs:.ba.tians z:nd requi�emez�ts of Title 16, to which particular r�ference i� made� , (5 } tVnisances pxohibite�, • see Sectian I.8,I.Z:07U. � . Ia.24.111 �i� clesi�n _zEView. All develcr�r�n� �.n the A,�40 �one shall be subjec� to �z�e�esign revi�w. _ . I8.24 .. 17� Qsa�Ye��o�e�n �pac� anc� �ecreation ar�as. A,n are� c�r areas c�� usab-Ie-open space �.�rec�:Aa�.z.Qna3. gur-� poses shall .r�e pr�vi.ded in mul�i�a:niI.y devel.apn��ts. . A ma,n�.-- mur.ti oL twa hundreci square feet eP recreatian area shaZ1 be . provid�cl far each of the first twenty dwelling uni.ts; �.wo ; ,; hunared £ifty square feet fe= units twenty-one �hrough thi�ty; �i anc� three �iundred square f�et for each unit caver thirty. Th� sur£3ce area of �ecreatian bui�dinqs, incl.uding swirtutt�.ztq ppolsr �nci recxeation ha.�.ls may be inaluded in computing the mi.rti.raum size of �he area_ R��i�i�al �acilities shall be pro�tided i.n keepi.r�g with. �h� ',, need ,�f the prospective tenants. Re�reation. areas shall nat � be Yocated in arequarecl yarcls, parking or maneuvering areas. . ' � � • ��i Eormula for Computing Open Space Requirements ; Hwe11�3nq IInits P�inimum Sguax� Fe�t Per Dwel.inq Unit ' "• 1 to 20 . 200 (example: 20 D.iI, x 200 = 4,000 sq, ft.) *21 to 30 250 (ex�m�le: 30 D,U. x Z50 = 7,500 sq. �t.) �! 31 to --- 300 (examgle: 31. D.U. � 300 = 9,30Q sc�. �t,) � ��he recreational and open spacs areas must be located for easy access Iay ; all residence. , j � . I ; 4 � M1 ��i M E M O R A N D U M I T0; TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSI�O,N,/ March 12, 1980 II FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ki+t N�,� SUBJECT: ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 3-80 (City of Tigard) AGENDA ITEM 5.6b OF THE Mb1RCH 18, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Attached, is a draft of the amendment to Section 18.56.110 (1) of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Amendment is proposed to bring the zoning code into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan that places a maximunn number of dwelling units per gross acre in the appropriate underly�ing zone. Furthermore, i�t has been found that the present formula for the density calculation in the Planned Development section does not accurately repre�ent the underlying zone number of dwelling units per grass acre. As an example, the R-7 Zone has a maximum dwelling unit of four (4) per gxoss acre. Iiowever, the calculation under Section 18.56.110 (1) of the Code in the R-7 Zone st te a s: . . .divide b the minimum lot area er dwellin unit • Y P g allowed in the underlying zone.. . . �t►e lot area for R-7 is 7,500 square feet. 7,500 square feet divided into a gross acre of 43,563 square feet equals 5.8 dwelling units. Therefore, there are 1.8 dwell.ing units above the intende.d four (4) dwel'ling Luzits per gross acre called for by the Comprehensive Plan. � Example of calculation; 20.00 gross buildable acreaqe minus -20� for public improvements equals�— net buil8�ble acrea.ge multiply X 4 dwe7.ling units per gross acr� equals 64 total dwelling units allowed Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed ordinance as written. � w �' S CITY' OF TIG�1�D, GREGCIN ORDINANCE NO. SO-- a i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CfIAPTER 18.56,110 OF 'THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY � CHANGING THE DENSITY CALCULATION FORMULA AND FTXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . j Tf3E CITX OF TIGARD ORI?AIN5 AS E'OLLOWS: �; Section 1: That Section 1�.56,110 (1) of the T.igard Muzricipal Code relating to �" Density be changed to read as f�llows: �! (1) The gross buildable acreage of the property involved wil.l �s, be computed. �venty (20�) perc�nt of this will be subtracted for � public improvements to the property. The remaining net acreage shall then be multiplied by the number of dwelling units per �� gross acre allowed by the underlying zone which the planned development �i is located. For the purposes of this section, the phase "buildable �i �� portian" shall include the following: �� Section 2: This Ordinance shall be effective immediately after its passage `! by the Council and approval of the Mayor. , �' PASSED By vote of all Council members present this - -- day of , 1980 after being read two times �y number and title on1y. �' ! IA �{ Recorder - Cit of Ti ard �'� Y g �' APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of __, 19 �' � Mayor - City of Tigard � �; � � . � �}+` 7AA 3-80: �