Planning Commission Packet - 02/05/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
.
a
AGENDA
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSTON
��k February 5, 1980 - 7:30 pm
f Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walnut 5treet, Tigard
1. Open Meeting:
2. Ro11 Ca11:
3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meetings:
4. Planning Commission Communication:
5. Public Hearings:
A. Staff Report
B. Applicant's Presentation
C. Public Testimony
1. Praponent's
2� Opponent's
3. Cross-Examination
D. Staff Recommendations
E. Commission Discussion & Action
5.1 MISCELLANEOUS, M 1-80 (Russell A. Krueger Special Permi.t) NPO #7
5.2 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZC PD 1-80 (Holman Project) NPO #6
5.3 CONDITIQNAT, USE, CU 1-80 (Titan Properti.es Corp./Wirisom Terrace Subdivisian) NPO #3
5.4 Z(7NE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZC PD 2�80 (Gary Reid) NPA #4
5.5 7,ONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 1-80 (Chapters 18.72 and 18.56)
6. 01d Business:
7. New Business:
8. �ther Business:
9. Adjournment
I
�
_ _ __ _ _ _
.
PUBLIC NOTICE
� TZGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
February 5, 1980 - 7:30 pm
Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard
5. PUBLIC FIEARINGS
�.1 MZBC�•LLANEOUS, M 1-80 (Russell A. Krueger Special Permi.t) NPO #7
A request by Mr. Russell A Krueger for a Special Use Permit approval for
improvements in floodplain and drainageway areas on the 36.8 acre parcel
in the A-2 "Multi Family" and R-5 "Single Family Etesidential" Zones
located adjoining the east side o£!.135th, 4Q0' north of Morning Hill Drive, �
5,400' south of Scholls Ferry Road and adjoining the west side of 130th
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lots 300, 5A0, 6Q0, 601, 602 and 603) .
5.2 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DTSTRICT, 7,C PD 1-80 (Holman Project) NPO #6
A request by Tualatin Developan�nt C�mpany, Inc. for a Zone Map Amendment
Planned Development District .from Washington County R5-1 to City of T3.gard
R-7 "Single Family Residential Planned Development District" Zone on a
20 acre parcel located adjoining the south side of SW Durham Road connectirig
to the north side of Cook Park between SW Serena Way and SW 92nd Avenue
(Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S1 14B, Tax Lot 100) .
yv
5.3 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 1-80 (Titan Proper�ies Corp./Winsom Terrace 5ubdivisinr� NPO #3
A request by the Titan Properties Cor�oration for a Conditional Use approvaY
to construct 10 attached single famiZy unii:s c�n a 3.`l8 acre parcel Zonec;
i. R-10 "Single Fami.ly Residential" located fronting on zhe wesL side of Grai��
Avenue, 60' south of School Street and 228' north of Park Street (Wash. Co.
Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lot 800)
5.4 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZC PD '2-80 (Gaxy Reid) NPO #4
A request by Mr. Gary Reid for a Zone Map 1�mendment and Planned Development
District from Gity of Tigard R-7 "5ingle Family Residential° to City of
Tigard M-4PD "Industrial Park" Zane on a 0.4 acre parcel located at
10060 SW Katherine Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BB, Tax Lot 200) .
5.5 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 1-80(Chapters 18.72 and 18.56)
1� request by the City of Tigard for a Zone Oidinance Amendment for Chapters
18.72 and 18.56 to allow the Planning Director the authority to determi.ne
the continuation of Conditional Use and Planned Development Districts when
expiration occurs and substantial changes have not taken place.
�
TT Publish January 23 and January 25, 3,980
�
I _
MINUT�S
TIGARU PLANNING COMMISSZON
Februat�Y 5, �980 - 7:30 p.m,
�;; T'owler Jun:ior High School - Lecture Room.
10865 �. W.,.Walnui; St. - Tigard, Oregon
President Tepedino OPE�1�i� the meetin� at 7;30. ��
ROI,I.4 CALL•
,
Pxesent: Bonn, Funk, Tierron, Kolleas, Poppi Smith, Speaker, Tepedino �I
AbGOnt: Helmer '�
Staff: Howard, Solby
The MIN'UT�S of the January 22 meeting were considered, �nd on
motion by Popp, seconded by Kolleas, they were unanimous].y approved
as presex�ted.
No COMMUNICATToIVS to the Planning Commission were reported by
Staff or CommiSSianers.
Tlae I'rosident opened the PUBLIC HEA�tT.N'GS portion of the meeting
by reading the usual notice of authority for �nd the praceaure to be
folio;�ed in the meeting.
�.i 5.�. MTSCELLAN�US, M 1-80 (Russell Ao Krueger Special
S�° Permi t) N�p /�7
A request by Mr. Russell A. Krueger for a Special Use Permit
approval for improvements in �loodplain and drainageway areas
on t;he 36.8 acre parcel in the A�?_ ��Mu1ti Fam;L'l.y" and R-5
� "S�,ngle Family Residential�� 'Lones located adjoining the east
sicio of 135t.h, Q00� north of Morning Hi11 Drive, 5:400'
south o.f Scholls Ferry Road and adjoining the west side of
130th (INaeh. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lots 300, 500, 600a
6�1, 602 and 603).
I�oward read tha STAFF RE1�(?RT and R�COMM�DATIONS and called attena
tion ta certain material supplied with it.
The APPLICAN`P'S PR.ESENT/�TION was made by Al Benkendorf, 620 SW
N'ifth AvP., Portland� who reviewed the history of this project before
th� Gommis,�ior► and addr�eeed specifical'ly �he concerns expressed by
Commisai.onera at the August 21, 1979 hearing; fZoodplai.n, drainageway
imp�at, and emergency ve,hicle aacess.
I3enkenclorf in'�raduced Larry Bogar, retired, a former Corps of
I',n.gineer� emplayee, ivho obtained the prelimiz�ary data of the Corps'
study of th�► Fanno Creek drainage. The el.evationa of Summer Creek
under lOq year �lood conditions wexa presented in a letter of DecemUer 17
l'"�
�,,,, _ , ;_ .
MINtJT�S
TIGARD PLANNTNG (:OM1�IISSIUN
�'ebruary 5, 1980
�x Pa.ge 2
; to Mr, Bogar from the G�rgs of Engineers, and are embodied in the
design of t`he projec�t„
Mr. Benitendorf introduced Dave Evans, consult�nt, 200 Market
Street, Portlan.d. Mr. Evans dxscussed in detail the modifications to
t,he ori.ginal plan mads in response to the concerns for the drainage-
ways expressed at the August 21 hearing. (Three lots were eliminated,
but ths same overall density was retained by the addition o� three
cltxplexes in place of single�family residences.),' He described prdvision
for drai,nage, referrin� to exhibits, and explained the aperatian of the
pond i.n this conn.ection.
There was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
COMMTSu70N llISGUSSION AND ACTInNt Fuizk, T�padi.no, F'opp arid Smith
had questions about whether �he drainage system as designed would handle
runoff fram the impervious surfaces introduced by full development of
the project. S�r. Evans responded� referring to Cc1ZCUl�'��0T1 in the
. written presentation. Staff stated this concern would be addressed in
greater deta.il a.n the general �l�:n review heaxing on thi� pro�ect.
Sma.th in.c�uired whether it was the intent of the C�mmission that
�' a drainagetvay could be channelled intq a culvert when the s�nsitive
�"' lan.ds ordinance was redrafited. The President referred to Funk and
Speaker, wh.o were members of the committee, bu� nei#.her recalled that
this particular situation was acidressed. Both a�reed t.he attempt was
to make best use of �he land wi�hout impairing t}ae funct3on af naturai
dra3.nageways. Mr. �enkendorf sumraa.rized their ef.fart as an attempt ta
util.ize both xiatural and man-made systems to preserve the integrity
of the land•
k'app sta�ed he fel.t the probl.ems had heen well though� aut, aizd �
apparent:ly wero properl.,y engineered, and therefore NTOVEA for approval
��' Specia:l. Use k*ermit, M 1-80, l�ased on Sta�'f Findings and Recummenda-
tions anci the data submitted by the appl.icant. Kol.leas seconded the j
motion, w.hich carried unanimously. j
5•� ZqNF CHANC�E PLANNED DEVELUPMk�T DI5TRICT, ZC PU 1-80
(Hol�nan F�roject) NF� ��6 !
A request by �ualatiin Developmen� Company, Inc. �ar a Zone ��'
Map .Amendment Planned nevelopmen.t Distra.ct from Was.hington �
Count� 125-1 tU Gity o� Tigard R-7 �oSingle Famity Residential
Planned Aevelop�nQnt Dist�ict�' Zane.on a 20 acre parcel located
adJoining t.he s�uth side of �SW Dur.ham Ro�.d aonn.ect3.ng to the
north .�ide af Gook Park between SW Serena Way and SW 92nd �
� AYenue (Wash. Co. Ta.�r Nap 2S1 11�B, Tax La� 100). ;
�
f
$
i`'
. ,;
. �,;
, . ;;
• MzrrvmEs
� TTGART7 PLANNING COMMTSSION �'
Feb7^uary 5, �980
Pa�e 3
;�
�
Howard referred to the niemorandum submit�ed by Staff qn this item,
explaining why there was no Staff Report, 2'.he Pre;�ident then a�ked for
Commission obsexvations under the circumstances. S�eaker commented
that the Staff inemo stated that Staff needs a7.1 the facts k�efore `'
p�oparing a Sta�f Report} and that he felt �he Commissioners needed
a Staff Roport before making a deci,sion. He thereupori MOVF::IIl ZC PD 1—$0
(Holman Project) be tabled. Kolleas seconded.
The President then asked the appli.cantts represontative, Joe
Wa1�h o� Waker Associat�es, for ha.s cotnments. He explainPd the status
of tho possible acquis3.tion of t.he Knauss property adjoining. In
general he asserted �Ghe applicant had supplied the information neces—
sary �'or a propar hear3.ng. Howard explained problems in connection
with the development of this and other tract� soizth of Durham RoAd,
- and suggested that at least until the status o£ the adjoining Knauss
property was determined, he was unwilling to consider thQ present
, application bocause there is a severe d�ainage problem on t.he Knauss
property, and access to the Picks T,anding developrnent to the west and
tho Kneeland Estates to the east needs to be �vorked out. He point�ed
out �hat the Holman and Knauss properties, if combined as now seems
prabableA woizld come to �he Commission in tw� PD heara.ngs instead of
four. �
f,- Speaker inquixed when the applicant would kn�w about the Knauss
�. property„ B1ad Voytilla of �'ualita.�a Development Company aaid it could
go thxou�h as ear7s� as t�ie middlo of February, but that there were a f$
number of things which yet need to be worked out. j;�
Sel.by stated tY�at the inforraation submiiied by ic:ne applican� wae `;
not adequate or ti.mely far presentat�.on to �.his haarin,o Sm?th obsvrved
that the app].icant �hould not l�e deniod hi� right to be heard if he
insisted, oven thou�h Staff might tsll him and t.he Cornmissioza the ;''�
information is not adequate. He would then .have to take .his chances
on havi.ng his project denied for l.ack of full information. Howard
reiterated hls conviction this project is not ready and that was the ;i
decision .he had made whon writing the memorandum to the Commisbione �I
i
The Pre�;ident then. called for the vote on the motion to table, ��
which carried unanimously. ;`��
'I
5.? CQNDITTONAL USE, CU 1-80 (Titan 1'roperties Co.rp./
tiyinsoni Terrace Subdivision) NPO �3
p
A request by t.he �itan k�roperties Coz�poration for a Conditional R
Use approval to canstr,uct 10 attached single fam3.ly uni�s on
a 3.28 acre parcel Zoned R-14 '�Si�gle FaYnil� x2esa.dential�i ;'
,
located fxonting on the west s�.de of Grant �v�nue, 60� sout.h
of School Street and 223� north af Park Street (Wash. Co. �:,
� Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lot $00). f'`
,i
�;�
4('
�li
- � � � �. � #.�
1=
�a
�;.
�
, �
.
li
. MIP�UTES ':;
TIGARD 1'LANNING COI�7I�IZSSION
FebruarY 5, 1980
Pa�;e 1�
Howard read the ST�!FF R�PORT and RECOMMENDA7'TONS.
The A�'PLICt�NT'S PRI'�SENTATION was made by David Bryan, consul.tin�
e�gineer, 12385 �tN Allen B1vd., Beaverton, He had notkting to add to
the Staff�s presen�Eation, but did di.aplay and explain a rendering o�
the developmexit proposed in this appla.catian.
PUB�IC TFSTIMONY —�- all i� opposi�i,on -- was presented by:
�*� Wa1t Cundiff, 12P60 SVJ Watl�ins
**� Nlary Ann Gunderson, 1300 S��l �latkins
#** Maury Lesperance, 13060 SVJ Watkins
**� A1 Makiri, 131z0 S�l Watkins �
*** RaNaye Hoffman, 12880 SW Watki.ns
��� BiJ.1 Heppner, 13180 SVf Watkins
M�. Cundif.f presented a petit3.on signed by �8 persons a.n the
neighborhood, including al]. adjoining property owners, abjec�ing to
this development as requested. He su��;ested �th'e price of t.he 1.ots
�or single—family use tivas too high. r�rs. Gunderson descr.ibed a severe
baGQment �looding problem which s.ho ai:�;ri.buted to t.he development work
alx�eady don� on the propQrty• Mx's Leeperance8 a member of NPO �3,
sa�.d t.he result of lengt.hy discussion by that body wae that there was
sufficient buffering else�v.here, and this parcel was not needad ax
`r desired fo-r buffering wit.la multifarnily residences. He projected an ,<,i
estimated trips per day an the basis of the 20 home�. Mr. Mackin ff
quostioned why this has been brou�ht up onco a�ain--he though�G i.� had ,
�aan ssttled by the Commission. as sin�le=,fama.ly some time ago. Staff t
explained that anyona could bring up anythin� by presentin� perta.nent �
data and payin�; the req.uired fee. Mr. Mackin and others expressed the
canv�.ctian that all surruuiiding properties woul.d be deprossed in value {�
as the resu].t of this developmenta ''
Mrs. Hoffman aescribed tk�e subst�nndard streets nver which school
e.hildren must; wa1.�t to �,et t� sc}iool, arid the po�ent;ial problems for
emer�;ency vehiclos because of �arking on already narrow streets. She ;�
objected to the lack of written promises b,y tkte developer of the price
of the units contemplated, and. that 1100 square foot houses are too ?
small; that tlze developer from Hil.lsboro��ou��s in, develops, t.hen �
geta out. She asserted th�re is no nPed �'or this type of .housing in
T3.�ard, ca.tin� present vacanca,.es in duplexes in Gaarde Park, and a �
J.ar�e development �oing in in: Summer Lake. S.he asserted present rosi— ?
den�Gs snould have �he same ri�ht to determine their ne�.ghborhood that !
purchasers in a new devolopmant do. Mro Heppnez^ objected to t.h� loss ;
of privacy because nf t;he small lots, and asked fox a ten—foot si�ht—
obscuring fence aroun:d the develo�ment.
12�' UTTAL AND CROSS �' AMTNATIQN: Datrid �3ryan� speakin� on behalf
_.._._._,w�._.
of �Yie applic�nt, stated the a.ssertson made that some of the lots wero
around I�,000 square :feet is in error: �hat all are a� least 5,000
��
• , �i;
, MTNUTT'�.S i'
T�GA,RD PZ!#NNING COMMISaION ,'
I'ebruary 5, 1980
Page 5
�,;� '�
squa�°e feet. T.ho nati.ve trees were discussPd. It was asserted
some of them have recently been cut down, and that many oF t.hem are in
poox condition., and athers are seedling pie cherries w.hich are a
nuisance and s.hould 1�e removed.
COMMISSION DISCCJSSION A2JD ACTION: Speaker asked the nature and
extent of the rnarketing efforts on the development as singl�•-family
lots. rlike Duncan stated he had personally talked wit.h a dozen
reliable �irms, wit.h price open, but got no takexs. He contacted 300
o�.her building firms by mail, wittx the same resulto His conclusion is
there is na market for tlzese as large lots; aonsequently t.his effort
to ' felop a smallcr, good quality home in the pxice ran�e affordable
b;� t.he first•-i;ime home buyer.
Selby asked for the addition of Condition No. 9 because of a
previous commitment: '�9. T.hat a six—foot hi�.h fence be placed along
t.he proper.ty line o� the subject proper�y and Tax Lot 1300.�� Another
candition with respect to a sewer easement was not iz�.cluded because the
matter could be handled privately.
Popp related the extensive discussions held by NFO ��3 concerning
this parcel, and fe1.t this should be s:i.ngleofami].y in accoxdance wit.h
the comprehensive plan. T.herefo.re he MOVED denial of the request,
��� �econded by KoJ.leaso �
�
"�:
Smith explained �G.he surrou�ding large lots as necessary for �
sep�ic �az�s at the time of their develapment; he disa�reed �vith the
assertion t.his development vrould dep,ress the value of surrounding
praperty. FIe felt N1�Q #3 3.s not in touch with tl�e housing mark�t of !
i
today. He wished it w�re possible to put detached hames on these `
small 1.ots. �
�
Speaker asserted the function of the ]?lannin,� Commission is not �
to guarantee lovr� or modest�-cost hausing, but rather to holp m;al.�a ,�.�
possibl� by allovring �maller lots. Ho cited the ener�y cris3.s as �i
inda.aation that we are �oin�; to have to use land more intensivbly',
and rejected the implied classing of renters as less than first class
ci�izons. He suggeyted that if the surrounding arca vrere developed to �
city st�,ndards for st�eots and sidow'alks, there tivou7.c1 be no concern
for the safety o� sc.hool children.
Kall.aa� o;�pross�d concern for th� sc.hool c.hildren who have to
walk on Grant Street. Se1by explained this development wil7. .have
half�streQt improvemonts along 4rant, and Howard explaznod the situatxon
vri11 b� improved fairly soon with the develo�ment of the Bishop property„
'�epedino asked if we were bQ�.n.� ��ratchetefl.'� Iioward said de��.n3.tely
noto To t.hQ question of whe�her this would.c.han�e �he c,haracter of
thc; ne:L6.hbarhood, Howard gave an emphat�.c no, assexting this is just
�-
��
Il�" _ .
:
,
'
v
' MINUTT�IS
�
TIGARD PLAPTNING COMNIISSTOId
FebruarY 5 a �-9s�
Page 6
�:�
on.e sma11 area in wlaa.ch chan�e must inevitably come. In response to
a question by Kollea.s it was expl.ained that detached k�ouses on 5,000
square .foo� �.uts would requa.re a Oomprehensive Plan Revision, vahile
the present applica�ion comes 9.n under a Conditional Use under existing
zon.ing. Smith �ointed out t.hat this parcel �has alread,y been graded,
with sewer stubs already in, and that therefore for cost reasons it
�houl.d be developed either wi�.h ten or twenty un�.i:s.
The President called for a vate. On a ro11—ca11 vote the motion
failed, four to four. Voting aye vrere Popp, TE.pedino, Kolleas and
Herrono
Spealser r10V�D approva�. of Condi�ional Use CU 1•-80, based on Staff
Find�.ngs and Recommendation�, includin� Con�ition No. � calling for a
six—foot fence along Lot 1i00. The motion was Seconded by Smith.
k'uxt.her discussion centered on a compromiso in 1.ot size, whic.h was
declared impossible tvithout a comprehensive plan chan�e. Howard said
tllis development g�nerat;es approximately ��9200 in devolo�rnent charges
for streets and parks.
T.he motion then carried by five to three, vri�h Popp, Ko].'leas and
Fierron voting no.
„� The Presi.dent d�c7.ared a five••minute recess a�: 9:50.
�.
j.4 ZONE CHANG� PLA.NN�D DEV�I'APMII�IT DISTRTCT, ZC PD 2-80
(Gary Reid) NPO �4
I� request by I�Iro Gax�y kea.d �or � Zone riap Arnendmen�; and
Planned Deve].opmant District from City af Ti�ax�d R-7 "Si.n�le
I'araily Residentia.l" to City of 'Pi�ard M>�.PD ��Industrial Park"
Zone on a 0.[f acre pa..rcel 7.ocated a� 10060 SVJ Katharine
S�reet (1�Yas.h. �o, max Map 2S1 2IiB, Tax L�t 200).
Howard read the STAI'I' REPORT and RECOMMENDATTONS.
The APPLICANT'S PI2F.,S�NTATION was made by Gary �eid, 12700 S�N 'T2nd
Avenue, Tigard, tlze owner, w.ho introduced Ted Ar�o, arc.hitoct for the
project, of Olson•-Argo, Lake Oswego. He presented the ra�Eionale for
the de�ign as submi��ed.
PUEiI�TC T� TTM�TJX: Speaking in favor of the proposal was Harley
H. Adams, owner of Ta�: Lot 100.
Speakin� in oppositian were; � ,
**� Steve All.ison. 10265 SW Kat.herine Street �,
*** Pat Fiohnste�.n 1008,5 SW Kathera.ne Street '
*��* newe� Tiama.ltorz 101.75 SW Kather3.ne Stroet
l
�
�
�
tl
I�INU TES
` TIG�RD PLAIJNING COMMISSIOAT
,Febrizary 5, 1,980
Page 7
.5�-
t;�
�
Each tvas concerned with the �raffic on I{atheriile Street if accsss
to th3,s ware.hou�e is off Kat.ilerine. Allison pointed Qut such aecess
was contrary to the NPO p1,an, and called attention to t.he l�g degree
righ�; tu��n off SW Tigax�d Street, t.he 1o�;ical route for trucks from
Highway 2�.7. Considerable concern was expressed for the safety of
numerous small school childr.en who wait for the bus at this corner,
and t.�,e problems should a trucker by raistake proceed dawn Katherine
Stxeet, which is dead end. n�uestions were raised about the contents
o� the ware.houae, and poss�ble addition to the °jattr•aci;ive nuisance��
asp�cts of the existing warehouses in the area.
CROSS E7CAMINATION AND REBUTTALs Mr. Reid addrossed the storrn
drai�n issue. In responso to a question �s to how many peop].e would
be employed, .he stated no definite figure can be �iven.
In an exte
nded discussion Dewe amilton c
H m 1
, arified that hi e
Y w 1
the NFO stated access to this p.roperty was to be through the adjoi�ing
industrial pariz, the }�resent develo�ment t.here precludes this access,
and consec�uently access must be off ISat.herine Streeto
The contents of the wax�e.house We�e que�tioned, especially w3.tY�
respect to toxicity a�d attractive nuisance aspects. Iioward explained
t.he requirements imposed on any tenant which occupies tlle building,
> - aut stated there ax�e 1.imitata.ons on enforcement wit.h only one code
� �� ontoxcemen.t empl.oyee. This was not acceptable to Mr. Hamilton,
COMrSISSIOAI DISCUSSTOIV AND AC�ION: �5mith led a di:�cussion on tl?e
accoss prr�bl.em during whic.h various alter�zatives were considered.
Popp got clarification of designations on t.he NPO #�2 map, and t,he manner
�
:iza w,hicli enfarcement af �he low noise, 1ow traffic, non—labor intens�.ve,
etc., provisions in Condition �. are enforced. Reid described the type
of tenant he hopes to attrac�. Tepedino related discussions sim3.lar
to those toni�ht i.n aon�nection with t.he fa.rst suc.h ware.housQ pro�ect
on Burnham Street.
The President called for a motion� and Smith MOVED approva], of
Lone Change Pl.anr�ed Deve].opmen� ZC PD 2-80, baeed on Staff Findings
and Recommendations, wit.h addition,a� recommendata.ons that —•.
(1) Access be moved aver to the northeast corner, the deta�.ls ta
be worked out �.n des�.�n reva.ew;
(2) The ro ofline of the building on t.he north and west sides be
reviewed in t:he desi� xevie�w process for compatibili�ty with the
residential neighborhood; and
(3) The possibi.lity o� obtaining ac�ess through �he industrial
par�s be explored in t.he site design process.
�,he motion vras secondsd by Herron and pas�ed unanxmously.
�
�
'
�_ _ _
i :
�, ,
. � vr � � i�.�I
. .. � . . i.;�.
. . . I'.'��'..
n
MINUT�S
TIGARD $L�NN�NG COMNIISSIO�t
�; FebruarY 5� -�980
1'age �
505 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMF.�TT, ZOA ].-80 (Chapters 18.72 and 18.56)
A request by �;.ho City oT Tigard �or a Zone Ordinance Amendm�nt
for C.hapters 18.72 and 18.56 to allow t.he Ylannino Director
t.he authority to determine the continuation of Conditional
Use and Planned Developraent Districts when, expiration occurs
and sub�tantial changes have not taken place.
Howard presented revised woxding of C.hapters 1.8.56e170 and
18•72.030 for consideratzon, Tepedino raised the question of what
�bjective measure mig.ht be included to eliminate the aharge of �'arbi�
trary and cap�ic3.ous". It was agreed no sati.sfactory objective mPa�ur�
is prac�ical. Smith preferred approval via a Staff process, but for
only six months rather than a yearP which was agreeable to Staff. 'Ehis
would require of tYte applicant a completely new application if substanm
tial progress .had not been made in �.8 mant.hs.
T.here was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
It was tlie consensus that �h� ordinances as discussed and revised
be submitted to the City Council �or adoption.
��
OTHLR BTISTNESS: Howax�d reported he ha� ask�d the City Council
to eliminate t.he Site Design Revie'w Board. T.he reason is that an
appeal from t.he Planning Director�s sits design decl.�ian goes on appeal ;
to the ��ite �esign Revieiv Soaz•ci, w'hos� ��f:ior� is iinal. iVO appeal can
be tal�en to 1;he City Counc3,lo Howard's praposal, an the ot.her hand, is
tlaat an appeal from the Plan.ning Director's decisian woul.d be appealab�e
to t.ho Plannin� Commission, and �hence to the City Councilo Ix� discus�
s�.on, Smith, an a].�ternate member of the Si.te Desa.gn Review Board, stated
his bol�.ef the Si�te Design Fteview Boax�d is na� an effective body.
Howard suggested that annexations in the �uture be made v�ith
zoning in. accordance wi.t.h ��,e C�mpre.hensiv� P1an. �hi.s vtou].d elim3.nate
one �tep. �ack� Commissa.on member would receive the 5taff Report a�
submi�tted to �Ghe Boundary Cummis�ion for review prior to t:t�e �ound�ry
Commission haaring, togetk�er with the Zone Text Ordinance annexing
the property to comprehens3.ve zane. Thls vrould give the Commission
mQmbers the opportunity to .have the ap�licant appear before t,he Com—
missian if i� is thou�.ht desiriable, fox whatever rea�on. T�era was no
diseent expressed on t.he Commission.
After a general presen�ation of probloms facsd by tk�e Staff in
day to day operations, the meeting adjourned at 11:3Q.
,�
i?
�. �i
� � I;`1
i'"r:
i',:,
�,.t.
�;'
iy,
`;,
�
�iA:.:- . . . . . . . ...�.. .. . . . . . ...... ... ..... ;.. . . . ... �:.. ... . . �'e.
'�
� ,
, ,
1,
� �i "PLANNING COMNIISSTON SIGi�1-UP SHEET"
\,
�.' N0�'TCE: ALL PERSONS DESTRII�G TO SPEAK ON ANY TTEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE
APPRC)PRIATE 5TGN-UP S�ET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF TfiE ROOi�i. FERSONS
DESIRTNG TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORUTARD BY THE CHAIR TO 5PEAK ON
INDICATED ITEM(u) .
AGENDA ITEM: S '�r ���JJ �—�U REF'�RENCE: /�c-i..c� { � ^ DATEs
______f_,
NAME ADDRESS
_�l"?T�' ��f��?i�/ Id' �-�� ��/ �����ri�z c �T=
�i/ �a a UJ �'�7f�'�ni�� �
. `' ' � r,�
� W P
�
.
.
�v..�?S: � ��f ve..�-,v�_
�-
. _..
. ,
� �
�
l ,
��� �. ��� � ,
�
�� .�.�,�x.�
� ' -��, o� ���fi�2�--r P-�Ku.,a.�..�
'=���=� �' t Ac�G.�_� ���.u�Ci 7
,� � -, .� ��<�
r��� � .
��w
AGENDA ITEMs REE'ERENCE; DATE:
NAME ADDP,ESS
,>;.
-
-
AGENDA ITEM: REFERENCE: DATE:
_
I
NAME ADDRESS
•
�,
i
;
_... -;; r ;:,,�- ,�: :•. . :. .. . .. ,„._ ,_.:....�
� ., .
,� _
�' - _
� .•.
, ._. _
y
"PLANNING COMMISSZON SIGN—UP SHFET" �
i .
i �"�'
�,. NOTICEc ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THE:LR NAME ON THE
APPROPR:IATE SIGN—UP SfIEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS
DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL TF3EN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHb1.TR TO SP�AK ON
�NDTCATED ITEM(S) .
AGENDA I TEM: S�/ /� �—�(� REFFRENCE: J�(r(�.' �/�12�,� • DATE: �5�'—�-�—
��y--� -�
I3E1M'E ADDZ'.ESS
fl�tJ� -L=U�S �c� ,�t.v y�-��.�-�( Por�"� '
i
AGENDA ITEM: , Z �- �' l'►� 1—d�U E2EF'ERENCE; ��r�i-cn��,���L�� AATE: �
�� { 1
C-- -- NAME ��+.JD RE S S • i
�r;F'' I
�
,
,
F
��
. ir
k
�
;
t;�
� �I /— �i
AGENDA TTEM: S � 3 �U REFERENCE: ���� ��/) DATE: 5t
,
�3
NAME ADDRESS • ���
€;
�,;
�' u h I �� �Z l� �4 �`~C�CI �-�G/���� n.s /qv�
,
.���a ` � � �.
��:
�i��A v/� �/ � Fs�E�2.9-Y �c T /.�o�d � � ���7`k i��S �
t—T �
� a ,� ° / ,
�..'� � ��� ��r'�:"���c+ir'P"G��'k�f:.�.,....«' / �5,�..�+. Q � .l�^`�''1 WG� �i�t`�' ^.l f"�'�+�;,,,. 1��.
1,
, �� ��� � � � ' � �
/ � j � �C1 ��� '�`��'��Z�� � �
��� � —� �;Gt� (�-L� �n� �c..�D �.�,� ��
4��� _
��,�:. ����� _ �
v:_ . �,. ��_ . , . n._ m�..�_ .�_ �.
,°
STAFF REPORT
� AGENDA 5.1
iPI�GARD.iPLANNING COMMISSION
February 5, 1980 - 7:30 pm
Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walnu.t Street, Tigard
DOCKET: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, M 1-80 (Winter Lake) Ref. ZC 25-78, 2C 24-79)
APPLICANT: Mr. Russell A. Krueger OWNER: Mr. R. Krueqer
4320 SW 110th Tax Lots 300/500/600
Beavertan, Oregon 97005 Mr. G. Scott
Tax Lots 601/602
11640 SW 135th
Tigard, Oregon 97223
APPLICZ�TTON
DATE: January 21, 1980
SITE
I�OCATION: Adjoining the east �ide of 135th, 400' north of Morning Hill Drive,
5,400' south of Scholl.s Ferry Road and adjoining the west side of
130th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33D, Tax Lots 300, 500, 600, 601, and
602)
REQUEST: For Special Use Permit to locate street and private driveways in
��;> the drainagewa,y on portions of the Winter Lake Planned Development
and Subdivision.
PP.EVIOUS ACTTON:
On August 21, 1979, the Planning Commission approved the request by applicant for
a subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development with conditions. (See the last
page of the applicant's Sensitive Lands Permit Report.)
I. FIIJDINGS OF rACT:
1. The applicant's report addresses the issues of floodplain, drainageway impact
and emergency vehicle access.
2. The study (see attached bonk) indicates that the , drainageway
will be incorporated with the subm'.srged storm d'rainage
system. The request to place streets and priva�e drive aver the drainageway
is permitted with certain requirements as stated in Section I.8.57.040 of the
Tigard Municipal Code.
3. The report calculates the estimat�d runoff peak periods from the east and west
basins. Both areas wi11 not be adversely affected with the road improvements.
�
J
STAFF REPORT
�4' AGENDA 5.1
TIGARD PI�ANNTNC� COMMISSION
February 5, 1980
M 1-80
Page 2 ,
,
4. Pa e 4 t
1 of he re ort addresses the emer enc
9 P g y vehicle access. However,
since � response by the Washington County Fire Department District 1 was not
reeeived prior to this staff report, this issue shall be addressed as part
of the general plan review.
5. Page 10 (Conclusions) states the adjustments to the preliminary plan that were
made to accomodate the sensitive lands areas.
6. 2'he letter (page 5) from the Corps of Engineers is sufficent data to dispell
the concern that any of the subject site (other than the pond area) is in
the floodplain.
IT. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS:
1. See the Public Works Director's Memo dated January 24, 1980 in reference to
the applicant's Special Use Permit.
2. The request and supportive data submi.tted by the applicant have ac3equately
�� met the 9ensitive Lands Ordinance.
sM
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recammends approval of the Special Use Permit subject to the fo�lowing
condit�.ons:
�` 1. That the question of emer�ency �rehi.cle access be resol�yed at the Cyeneral Plan
and �'roc�ra� Heari,nq.
2. That site and public dra,inage constxuction plans be a�proved by the Building
and Public Works D.epartments pri.or to issuance o,� Building �ermits or Bonds.
3. No chan ges will be macle to approyed plans or specificatians unless formal
application is made to the ap�ropriate City department and chan�es are approyed
by that department. Appliration �or changes will be made in writing and shall
include applicable drawings.
4. That the proposed drainage syste� shown on this application be added to the
general plan.
Prepared by Ken elb . Approyed by oward
Ass ' te City �lanner lann ng Director
� -
VIl7C
�r......�., - , , _
i
r
MEMO
TO: KEN SELBY January 24, 198U
FROMi FRANK CURRIE ,
SUBJECT: WTNTERLAKE; - SENSITIVE LANDS PERMTT
Ken:
I have reviewed the information submitted by David Evans and Associates and Benkendorf,
Evans LTD.
From a practical poir,t of view, I would agree with the applicant that no floodplain
exists on the site based on information from the Corps. of Engineers relating to
Summer Creek in that the Summer Creek floodplain is not on the site. However,
there are some lands immediately around the small lake and just up stream from
the lake which would be inundated during a 100 year storm depending on the design•
of the controlled out fall structure. Tn my opinion, this is an insignificant.
problem which can easily be addressed during the design s�tage.
'I"he hydraulics of the drainageways are well thought ou� accurately computed,
and then apparently partially enclosed within a storm drain conduit.
7.'he lake offers an excellent opportunity to accomodata stormwater runaff from the
proposed subdivisiori in accordance with our storm water detention ordinan.ce.
,
�;
t
_ _ �,�
�^��....,,. - , . . ,:; � , .. -, .,: ,• ,. , ..
r �:�. '�:;�.', .. .. ........ .... . ..... . . . ...... _. . . . .. . .. . _. . .... .. . . ...._,. . ._.. ,,. .. .. :._ . . ._:..�., . �:,5. .,.. '.�..'�..' '. ��
N�EMORANDUM
�`
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLt�NN2NG STAFF
DA'PE: JANUARY 31, 1980
SUBJECT: AGEl�1DA 5.2 ZCPD ].-$0, HOLMAN PROJECT
Tualatin Development Company (TDC) made application for a zone change on
January 3, 1980. 'rhis application involved a twenty (20) acre site (Wash.
Co. Tax Map 2S1 14Bo Tax Lot 100) on Durham Road between Kneeland Estates
and Picks Landing. On January 25, 1980, TDC notified Staff that they were
in the process of obtainin g an additional twenty (20) acres adjacent to the
original parcel (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14B, Tax Lot 301) owned by Knauss.
The nriginal application was for a R-7/PD designation. They requested access
to Durham Road. As you know, Council has designated Durham Road as an
"a limited access road". This was recently reiterated when Council unanimously
upheld your denial of Golf Creek Estates on 108th because the proper�y did
not have adequate access to Durham Road and a half street improvement was
not a,ppropriate to serve the western part of the parcel.
Now, thi:s new project has been presented to us. We asked Mr. Walsh of Waker
and Associates (Consultants for TDC) to submit an overall traffic circulaicion
plan to us for study. We learned today that Mr. Walsh intends to submit
r � this study to you on February 5th. Staff has not seen the study. We have
had difficulty with Waker and Assnciates before, and we do not wish to attend
the repeat performance of a "bad play". TDC is in the process of acquisition
of additional land. We need to have all of the facts before preparing a
Staff Repart. I feel that we should have the opportunity to review this
traffic study. Usually Staff is awarde d an opportunity to review a complete
� application befoxe an applicant appear� before the Planning Commission.
We are asking that you�ab�.� this item until. I am satisfied that we h,ave all
the pertinent information. I am suggesting that the Tax Lots 100 and 301
come in together under one PD application. When the applicant arid his
consultants have submitted a complete application, we will bring it forward
to you. '
r
�
,
. . . .. . : . . . . .
�»e._......". .. . . . . . . � .:. ....:..� _ ..". .. ... . .. .._... .... _. .... . .... _.. _.... ...._.. ., . ... .. ... , .. _ . _.� .. .. . , rr .. .,, .. ,�
, . . . , -� _,.. . . _ . �
� / � �"„" ._r ���
�� � - � �.�il
� � - � - �.�.
�_� '-� ! , -�fi,..�t1
r_ '\l�
� �� ',�,�►
� = tit B
�. � � �� e
� r
""� � ��
._ �,�`�.�.�.�-,�`�,r� ���,��,�'� �,����-��'' ��: ��i ,
_ .� ;�� � ��� , �� ,���
. � �►
� �i► �a . � �
'�i: �,. �'� ��� �� �` �'� �
� �r �' "�'.+��j � �' w•• �
:�. � ���. �►. �r',, �� r �� �. f
� ..,-`,.� �. �.-.� ���r�l■ ��. .
;� •� � ��►�.. �.� �:�,����! �� .�
�, �.,•. ���: �%� �, _: �
��'� �I�► A��,�� ,a� �w
.� � d"�► � ,
: , � �./'i���11�'�11��,�"/,�
.�
-�►
s. .� .
►, � , :,,. �
�
,i� S - \ `��
� �.� t�
�. �,' ,
'��
� / / /
'�� �
' �,� �� �
// ,
- ' �� j /
� .�
. �- ,�,��`,�� - �!�l�I,�`!�!�i!��.�!�''�`�, .
�.%�_.�.�!' ..t�. �� ��.
��i�►'�' ��1 �,�,�►�r� �
�► ��►��i �.�. ���
� .,�.-,� . ��-. .
�''���� �'/ ��� a
G � �r
���.. � �
I,I,�s e
� _ � � � �
� � � �i7
� � � � ��
/
� __ _ _. .
,
STAE'F REPORT �
�� AGENDA 5.3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION !
February 5, 19$0 - 7:30 pm
Fowler. Junior High '
�0865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard
I
,
I
DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE, CU 1°80 (Titan Properties Corp./Winsom Terrace) I
i
APPLICANTs Titan Properties Corp. OWNEFt: Duncan Properties and
448 So. lst AvenuP Ronald E. Phair, Jr.
- Hillsbora, Oregon 97123 448 So. lst Avenue, Suite �00
Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
APPLICATTQN
DATE: January 18, 1980
I
LOCATION
SITE: Fronting west side of Grant Avenue, 60' south of School Street,
228' north of Park Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 2CB, Tax Lot 800)
REQUEST: For a Conditional Use approval to construct 10 attached single
fami.ly units on a 3.28 acre garcel Zoned R-10 "Single Fami.ly
Residential". �
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Oxi October 2, 1978, the Planning Director approved a preliminary plat request on
the subject site to subdivide tk►e 3.28 acres into ten (10) ten thousand (10,000)
square faot single family lots with conditions. (See Exhibit "A") .
I. FINDINGS OF FACT;
1. 'I"he subject aite is zoned and designated as 10,000 square foot "singls family
residential" in the NPO #3 Plan.
2, The applicant proposes to construct ten (10) attached single family units on
the exi,sting ten (10) ten thousand (10,000) (plus) square foot lots. Each
dwelling unit (20 total) will have a minimum of five thousand (5,000) square
feet per lot. This request is in accordance with 5ection 18.20.02Q of the
Tigar.d Municipal Code allowing attached single family units on five thousand
(5,000) square foot lots as a conditional use in the R-10 zone. (See attached
site plan) .
3. The following NPO #3 Plan Policies are applicable:
Policy #5 and #6, Paqe 14 Site an d Public Service Improvements.
Policy #7, Page 15 Duplex Type Development In The Suburban Density Area.
�
, _ y. . ,
. : „.
�, °
d
STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
February 5, 1980
CU 1-80
Page 2
4. The subject site is .relatively flat and the water, sewer, streets, street
lights, landscaping and drainage are in. However, the increased density wi11
create a burden on the drainage system. Therefore, additional drainage wor}c
will be required.
5. Surrounding land uses are apartments to the east, single family homes to
the south and west, and preschool to the north.
6. The price for each dwelling unit will be approximately $50,000.00.
IT. CONCLUSIONARY FINDING:
1. The proposal is in keeping with the conditional use requirements of the
Tigard Municipal Code and meets the policies af the NPO for this land use.
2. The attached single family units will provide moderate income families the
opportunity of owning a private residence. The ex9.stiizg financial climate has
decreased the capital in�vestment ability of the average household income,
and, �herefore, new single family resi.dential �its have becozne limited.
3, Policy #2 of the 1977 Tigard Housing P1an states that diversified housing
shalZ be promoted f:o provide residential occupancy to various age, income,
sex, race, and living patterns.
4. The eharacter of the proposed development m�ets the desired owner occupied
character of the existing residents and provides the needed price range for
younger, moderate income yaung families.
IIT. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached single family units subject to compliance
to the following conditions: j
I
1. That construction and site drainage plans be submitted and approved by the �
Building and Engineering Department prior to issuance of permits. �
2. That the area described as "Landscape Island" be maintained by a Homeowners �
Association, �
3. No Qccupancy Pe rmits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon �
this dev�lopment by the Ci.ty of Tigard hav� beee► satisfied and inspecti.ons
werifyinq this have be�n carr.i�d out by the appacopriate depar�m�nt.
� (
`� �
�
�
�
a
�
,
�
e. �
. : _ ,
� � , . �rr
��, � � �
f
,y
�
ST�,E'F REPORT/AGENDA 5.3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
February 5, 1980
CU 1-80
Page �
4. Pio chanqes will be made to appraved plans or specigications unles�s formal
application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are
approved by that department. A,pplicatiori far chan,ges will be made in
wt�iting and shall �nelude appl.icahle drawinc�s.
5;. ALI exis�inq or proposed u�iliti�s shall be giaced undergxound. 5treet
lightir►g' installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director.
5. - �3o Hu:iiding Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day •
appeal pe:riod from the date o� approval,
�, Improveiments may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits.
$, mhat the apg:�.icant receive �relim.inary plat approval for the subdivision o.f
the attached single family lots prior to Building yermits.
� Prepared by Ken e Approved by Aldie d
Assoc te City Planner Plann irector
r
�a'.
�c ,��, ...� ��: �,� ,�- , ..�.. ,_. .. . .. ,.�:
� ��,F�
_ .
�.,�,,._. ... _
STAN'F REPORT
�G�NbA 5,4
TIGARD �LANNING COMMTSSION
1 February 5, 1980 - 7:30 pm
Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard
DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZC PD 2-80
(Gary Reid 1Project}
APPLICANT: Mr. Gary Reid OWNER: Mr. Leo C. Fleming
12700 SW 72nd Avenue 1834 Allard Ave., Sp. #69
Tigard, Oregon 97223 Eureka, California 95501
APPLICATION
DE1TE: January 1.5, 1980
SITE
LOCATION: 10060 SW Katherine Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BB, Tax Lot 200)
REQUEST: For a zane map amendment and preliminary plan with program from
City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" to City of Tigard �
M-4PD "Industrial Park Planned Development" zone on a 0.4 acre j
parcel. �
t
�
I. FINDINGS OF' FACT:
l. The subject site is zoned City of Tigard "R-7" and is designated M-4 "Industrial
Park" on the NPO #2 P1an.
2. The applicant proposes to construct a one story 11,824 square foot office - �
warehouse building as a planned development on a total 43,606 square foot lot. ;';
The plan includes two tax lots. Tax Lot 100 and 200. 2n May 1978, the City t`�
Gauncil approved a zone change to M-4PD on Tax Lot 100. In June 1979, j;�,
the City Council extended the planned develapment designation on the Tax Lot.
'I'herefore, Tax Lot 200 needs the same lanned develo ment desi �''
P p gnation to �,�
conform to the planned impravements on the adjacent Iot. (See Exhibit "A° �;s
and site plan) �;
I::.
�.,i
3. The applicant has paid the fee and submitted all the required documents °"',
qualifiying for the preliminary and gene�al plan and program as required `�'''
�;�
in sections 18.56,010 and 18.56.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code. ��.�
�;;;
t;i
4. The intent by NPO #2 on the M-4 designated areas is as follows: 4',:.;
G,;
The relatianship of this property to the adjacent industrial buildings j,�;
(Tigard Industrial Park) renders these properties �ndesirable for residential i;'
.�;
use and it is recommended that these properties be used for office space with
the existing Tigard Industrial Park. Offices should be located on this site s'
with the greatest concern for compatibility vaith the adjacent residences and r`
should include screening by means o£ fPncing and landscaping. In addition, ;;?�
�' 4�;.
��`�4
t,;F:
ft-;6
�:;�i,
�,:�F
�:;'��.
��qA
�aV:
.
� � ' . . � . . . . . . . . .. . , �,.:::�.�.. r �,... .� ::..,�.��..
k .
�
STAFF REPORT �
TIGARD PLArINING COMMISSION
AGENDA 5.4/ZC PD 2-80
`� February 5, 1980
Page 2 1
�
only single story buildings, in sca].e with the adjacent homes, should be
permitted. Vehicular access should be gained through the industrial park
rather than putti.ng busines� traffic on Katherine Street. A change in zone �,j
to permit this office use should only be approved as �n M-4, Industrial Park r
Zone, with an overlying Planned Development Zone. This would ensure that
the property would be developed according to the site develapment plan approved €
at the time of the zone ehange. A condition of the zone change shoulc� stipulate �
that if the project is not constructed, both the M�4 and Planned Development 4
�ones will revert to the original R-7 Residential Zone. Once the planned I'
development has expired, the underlying industrial zone could be developed ��
with any of the uses permitted in that zone.
5, The subject is relatively flat and vacan�. Surrounding land uses consist of f'
single family residence to the west and north, industrial warehauses to the i
south and east. � � ;;I
�:
r
6. Sewer and water are available to the site off SW Katherine Street. f'��
�r�
��
7. Traffic circulation will be available to the site off SW Katherine and Tigard �,
Street. SW Katherine is a City street with forty (40') feet of righ�-of-way rl
and is in substan dard condition, has no curb or sidewalk and inadequate parking E''
width. The NPO #2 Plan designates SW Katherine as a local Street.
�� .
II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS:
l. The applicant has sufficiently addressed all the concerns of the prelizninary
and general plan r.equirements stated in Sections 18.56.020 and 18.56.030 of
the Tigard Municipal Code. �;
�'I
2: The plan indicates that Tax Lot 200 will properly blend with T�x Lot 100. 4{
However, the two tax lots should be consolidated into one to eliminate restrictive �
uniform building code regu].ations. �'I
3. The proposed use is in keeping with the NPO #2 Plan and the faci�ities are 'I
avaa.lable to serve the business with standarcl improvements. �
i�
4. The applicant has expressed a desire to receiv�e approval of the general �
plan and program level if possible,
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
�
Staff recommends approval of the zone amendment from R-7 to M-�PD at the general f
plan and program level subject to the following conditic�s: �
� �
,, .
�1+w - : . , . ,
S�AFF REPURT
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
, r AGENDA 5.4/ZC PD 2-80
February 5, 1980
Page 3
1. If substantial construction or development has nat ta�en �lace within one {1)
year of the effective date of this Lone ehan�e, the property sha11 revert
back to the present R-7 zone.
2. A half street improvement to local street standards be proyided alang the
Katherine Street fron�age (to incl.ude meandering sidewalks and, if necessary,
curb to protect the exi.sting txees) prior to issuance of Building Permitsa
3. Five feet of•right-of-way be dec3ir.ated along the Katherine Street frontage
for street improvement purposes,
4. That offices will be the primary use, with secondary uses of warehouse business
subject to the following critieria:
a. Low traffic generators
b. Low generators of noise
c. Non-labor ir�tensive
d. Uses confin�d to storage .rather than manufacturing as�embly �,nd pxocessing.
5. That Tax Lots 200 and 100 be consolidated into one (1) prior to issuance of
' Building Permit.
� ;. ,
6. No Occupancy Permits shall b� issued until alI co�ditions placed upoz�
this develo,gment by the Cit� of `�:igard have been satis�ied and i.nspec�io�s ,
�re�a,a�vinq this have been cazriec� out by the �.ppropriate departtaent.
7. No changes wilt b� made to ap�r�ved plans or sgecifications unless formal
application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are
app roved by that department. App7.ication for changes will be made in
writing and shall include applicable c3rawings.
;
8. Grac3ing plans on all publzc right-of-cvays shall be submi.tted an8 approved
by the Public Worlts Director prior to commencement of work.
9. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this '�'
site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. �'I
10. �l existing or proposed utiliCies shall he pl:aced undergrt�und. Street :�
lighting installations shall be apprnved by the Public Works Direc�tvr.
11. �Io Building Permit sha11 be issued until �h,e e�.xpiration of the twenty day "
ap.peal. period from the date of approval,
12. Zmprovements may be bonded prior to issuance of Buitding Permits.
�
� �. � � � � � . . � . � . �. . � .. �
STAFF REPORT
TIGARD PLAIVNING COMMISSIQN
`�x AGENDA 5.4/ZC PD 2-80
% February 5, 1980
Page 4
13. That site and public drainage pl.ans and construetion be approved by the
Building and Public W'orks Department prior to issuance of Building Pe:rmit.
14. That the applicant receive site design review approval and bond for landsc.ape
improvements prior to issuance of Building Permits.
Prepared by Ken Approved by Al ` oward
Ass ate City Planner P1 ' g Director
�.
�
i
I
I
��� � � � �
vmc
�__..,_ ;, _.. . ...:... . ,
. � . .. ..:�
` _. � :. , p .
� � a
,. . .�,_,_,
�a, �� ��.
�:.,: .._ . ..v .
, : ., , _ _
� : � _ ., __ _ , , „_. .. �... ...
..
MEMORANDUM
�
Tt7: T G PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM 5 .5, February 5, 1980
FROI�: ' SELBY �OA 1-80
DATE; B12UARY 5, 1980
SUBJECT. PUBLIC HEARINU TO CONSID�R PROPOSED ZOI�TE TEXT AMENDNIENT FOFt THE
TITLE OF CHAPTERS 18.56 AND: 18.72.
Attached, is a ciraft of �he proposc�d amendment to 5e5ctions 18.56 and
18.72 of the Tigard Municipal Code.
The amendment changes the designee autharity from the P].anning Commission
to the Planning Director to determine the continuation of conditional
use and planned development districts when expiration occurs and substantial
chang�s in tt►e area have not occurred.
The purpose of the amendment is to streamline the continuation of the
approval proc:ess and pxevent the u�anecessary delay in continuing the `
development of a pzevious approved applicai:ian. �
�5
i
���
, r_ _,�,,:.� � .....w �..�.-.�.,,. 'P�.�-,. ,...�.,��,:
_
._.;:,�. .. � .. __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _�'
� �
,
� �
�
;'`;
z
� � �� � � � �;�
:,
�` �:{
�
CITY' OF TIGARD, OREGON �'
:a
�
ORDINANCE NO. 80-� ;3
�
AN Ok2DINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 18.56 and CHAPTER 18�72 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL 1
��,,
CODE RELATTNG TO TIME PERIOD EXTEN5ION AND FIXING AN EFFECTIV� DATE.
�1
�
�':�
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: �%
Section l: Chapter 18.56.170 of the Tigard Municipal Code is amended to read i;
as follows: �.':
�:
�;
1
8 56.170 Construction time eriod-•-Extension. If substantial �:,f
P �;
construction or development has not taken place within one year from the
�';
date of approval of the general development plan and program, the pl.anning �;
director shall review the district at a public hearing to determi.ne ''
whether or no� its continuation in whole or in part is in the public interest, 1�
and if found not to be, shall recommend to the city council that the planned �;;
developmerit district on the property be remc�ved. The city council., at the ''�
reguest of the applicant, may grant an exterision of time if justifiabl.s. L'�
(Ord. 71-4 F4, Exhibit A (part) , 1971: Ord. 70-32 8185-6, 1970) . a�;i
�;
, Section 2: Chapter 18.72.030 of the Tigard Municip.al Code is amended to read 4>;,
�; � as follow�:
18.72,030 Expiration when unexeraised. If a cnnditional use is
approved �y the planning oomanission and then is not exe�cised, it shall
expire in one year from the date of approval if the use has not begun and ;
continual progress toward its full operation is not in evidence unless it �;
is determined by the planning director that a one year extension of the
�;
conditional use may be granted with conditions if necessary when no subs•tantia7. ��
changes to the site or surrounding area . have taken place. �'
�,
Sec�ian 3: Thi,s Ordinance shall be effective immediately after its pa�sage by �
� the Council and approval of the I�ayor. 1=
PA5SED: By vote of aZl �ouncil members present this �
�
t
day of , 198_, after being read two times by �
�
number and title only.
�
Recorder - City of Tigard
APPRAVED: By the Mayor this day of , 198 �
� I
Mayor - City of Tigard
Ordinance No. 80-
ZOi1 1-8D
� � � � � � ,,,a, ._;,n. �„ .,,_. . r .,-��... ��
� _ � �� ���. � ��' � "�
. � ��
, - � � � � ��� �� � ���
,,�:�