Loading...
Planning Commission Packet - 01/08/1980 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AGENDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard 1. Open Meeting: 2. Roll Call: 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meetings: 4. Planning Commission Communication: 5. Public Hearings: A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony 1. Proponent's 2. Opponent's 3. Cross-Examination D. Staff Recommendations E. Commission Discussion & Action 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 4-79 (Mr. Gary F. Oxley) 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 5-79 (McCoy Property) 5.3 SUBDIVISION S 13-79 (Studio Estates) 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) 6. Old Business: 7. New Business: 8. Other Business: 9. Adjournment: • PUBLIC NOTICE L TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-79 (Mr. Gary F. Oxley) NPO #6 A request by MDS Investment Inc. for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from "Suburban Low Density Residential" (2 dwelling units per gross acre) on the upper two thirds of the subject site to "Urban Medium Density" (8 dwelling units per gross acre) on the remaining 10.27 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of SW Naeve Street and SW 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 500) . 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 5-79 (McCoy Property) NPO #1 A request by Mr. J. F. McCoy for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from the designated C-P "Commercial Professional" and A-2 "Multi Family" to C-3 "General Commercial" on the 1.23 acre subject parcels located at the northeast corner of SW Garrett Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lots 2400 and 2500) . 5.3 SUBDIVISION S 13-79 (Studio Estates) NPO #6 A request for an appeal by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cowger and Mrs. Golden of the approval decision by the Planning Director in reference to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Development Corporation on a half acre lot, in the R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development" Zone located at'approximately 500 east of Alderbrook Drive on Durham, Rd. (Wash. .Co. .Tax'Map 2S1 .11DC, Tax Lot 14200) . 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) NPO #4 A request by Mr. Keith VanEtten for a Conditional Use to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3.51 acre parcel zoned C-3 "General Commercial" located at 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 151 36DA, Tax Lot 900) . TT Publish December 19 and December 21, 1979 , . -2R) 77. vmc 12/17/79 PUBLIC NOTICE • f TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 4Vintiaty 22'., 1980• Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard Notice of postponement of January 8, 1980 meeting to January 22, 1980 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-79 (Mr. Gary F. Oxley) NPO #6 A request by MDS Investment Inc. for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from "Suburban Low Density Residential" (2 dwelling units per gross acre) on the upper two thirds of the subject site to "Urban Medium Density" (8 dwelling units per gross acre) on the remaining 10.27 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of SW Naeve Street and SW 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 500) . 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 5-79 (McCoy Property) NPO #1 A request by Mr. J. F. McCoy for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from the designated C-P "Commercial Professional" and A-2 "Multi Family" to C-3 "General Commercial" on the 1.23 acre subject parcels located at the northeast corner of SW Garrett Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lots 2400 and 2500) . 5.3 SUBDIVISION S 13-79 (Studio Estates) NPO #6 t A request for an appeal by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cowger and Mrs. Golden of the approval • decision by the Planning Director in reference to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Development Corporation on a half acre lot, in the R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development" Zone located at ,approximately 500' east of Alderbrook Drive on Durham Rd. (Wash. Co. .Tax Map 2S1 11DC, Tax Lot 14200) . 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) NPO #4 A request by Mr. Keith VanEtten for a Conditional Use to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3.51 acre parcel zoned C-3 "General Commercial" located at 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map lSl 36DA, Tax Lot 900) . • 1 TT Publish January 9 and January 11, 1980 vmc 12/17/79 • • MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 - 7;30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S. W. Walnut St. •. Tigard, Oregon President Tepedino OPENED the meeting at 7:30. ROLL CALL* Present; Bonn, Funk, Helmer, Herron, Kolleas, Popp, Speaker, Tepedino Absent: Smith Staff: Howard, Selby The MINUTES of December 4 and December 11, 1979, were considered for approval. Upon motion of Speaker, seconded by Kolleas, these minutes were unanimously approved as submitted. No COMMUNICATIONS to the Planning Commission were reported by Staff or Commissioners. The President opened the PUBLIC HEARINGS portion of the meeting by reading the usual notice of authority for and the procedure to be followed in the meeting. 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-79 (Mr. Gary F. Oxley) NPO #6 A request by MDS Investment Inc. for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from "Suburban Low Density Residential" (2 dwelling units per gross acre) on the upper two-thirds of the subject site to "Urban Medium Density" (8 dwelling units per gross acre) on the remaining 10.27 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of SW Naeve Street and SW 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IOD, Tax Lot 500). Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS. He explained the present status of sewer capacity for the area, probable developments to be undertaken soon, and the prospects of the construction by Tualatin Development Company of a gravity line to the large intercepter sewer line which will provide properly for all potential developments in this area. There was no APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. The President then called for PUBLIC TESTIMONY. Speaking in opposi- tion were: *** Libby Anderson, 15001 SAY 109th, the property owner to the north of the parcel under consideration. She stated she had sold four acres of her property to a developer With the understanding it would be developed with density as zoned--R-7--and accordingly asked that the subject parcel be allowed no higher density. i 1 MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION . January 22, 1980 it Page 2 At this time Commissioner Popp objected to consideration of the proposal in the absence of the applicant, and MOVED the request be 1" denied. The motion was seconded by Tepedino, who related fairly recent discussion on the Commission of this subject to the effect that the applicant has made substantial representations to the City, summarized in the written staff report received by the Commissioners; the action by the Commission is nevertheless binding; to refuse consideration of . the subject would impose a hardship on those who came to testify and on the City, because of the probable necessity of an additional hearing. Howard expressed the desire to proceed with this hearing because of foreseeable challenges to the Comprehensive Plan for very low density on this side of Little Bull Mountain by other developers who are inter- ested in the area. He hoped this hearing would provide a precedent useful in Staff dealings with these developers. After a little further discussion the motion failed, only Popp voting aye. Additional opponents: *** Al Erickson, 15200 SW 109th, who supported the NPO planning process and the plan developed. *** Libby Anderson, who responded to doubts expressed that the developer of her four acres would want higher density. She affirmed the developer would indeed expect to develop at the lower densities, feeling it would be cost-effective for the type of homes he wished to build. j *** Marge Davenport, speaking in place of BA McPhillips, 15100 SW 109th, long prominent in environmental causes. She read a long letter from Dr. McPhillips detailing what he considers the good environ- mental features which he hopes to see preserved through the low density development contemplated by the comprehensive plan. *** Marge Davenport, also of 15100 SW 109th, speaking on her own behalf, disputed the units per acre used by the Planning Department as the basis of calculations as higher than called for by the Plan; she took issue with the statement in a letter from Planning Director Howard to Dr. McPhillips, "The proposal is now a political issue"; and she objected strenuously to the development of 109th as a City street, 1 citing future heavy traffic from apartment dwellers at the top of the hill down 109th, through Summerfield to Durham to I-5. She stated that at one time a petition had been submitted to the City signed by all the residents of 109th requesting 109th not be cut through. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Speaker asked Mrs. Davenport if she was a resident of the City.She stated she was not, but explained an adverse drainage problem as the result of the Canterbury Woods development which. gives her a very legitimate concern in what Tigard does in the area. Speaker asked if 109th Was indicated in the Compre- o hensive Plan as a dead-end street. Howard stated the street as such j li MINUTES • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 Page 3 was not specifically addressed in the plan, but that when Canterbury Woods was approved, a condition was half-street dedication and improve- ment of 109th; that the other half would be required to be improved when Mrs. Anderson's property is developed; that the expectation of the City Council was that 109th would go through as property in the area is developed. Selby pointed out that local streets were not required to be designated in the Comprehensive Plan, and accordingly it was not specifically addressed. Other discussion touched on the two-year estimate for arrival of sewer to the area and the possible impact in the future. (Staff pointed out this was a request for a Comprehensive Plan revision only; that any specific plan for development would still have to come before the Commis- sion.) Popp favored the Comprehensive Plan as drawn and felt nothing in the application presented good reasons for changing it. He thereupon MOVED for denial of Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 4-79, seconded by Kolleas. Speaker announce is favoring of the proposal on the grounds of the better control by ttie City through the PD process called for by the Staff Recommendations. Staff clarified that development on this parcel would of necessity have to come before the Commission as a PD whether or not this request passed or failed. Tepedino was unpersuaded g a change in this case, based on the evidence presented, is desirable. ., The motion for denial then carried, with Speaker and Bonn voting no. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 5-79 (McCoy Property) NP0 #1 E A request by Mr. J. F. McCoy for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from the designated C-P "Commercial Professional" and A-2 "Multi Family" to C-3 "General Commercial" on the 1.223 acre subject parcels located at the northeast corner of SW Garret Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lots 2400 and 2500). Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS. Selby asked that "when development occurs" be added to the Staff Recommendation. The APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION was made by Gregory R. Mowe, 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Portland, attorney for the McCoys. He explained Mr. McCoy is a lumberman rather than a developer, which perhaps led to some of the problems. He explained the McCoy acquisition of the two parcels at different times and the desire to develop them as a unit. He explained the zoning which calls for different zoning on the front and back of the property. This does not permit a really good commercial development on a shallow lot. The lack of . vacant C-3 parcels in the city was mentioned. The property is already buffered by apartments. The request � t, would simply move the C-3 designation a short distance farther along MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 Page 4 t he highway to Garrett Street, and with the larger, deeper to t permitting a more attractive development. Mr. James McCoy, 13285 SW Howard Drive, explained the representa- tions to him prior and subsequent to the purchase of the property that it was zoned C..3. He felt a much more desirable development would result from zoning the whole parcel as C-3 than splitting it, as zoning maps now indicate. Selby asked Staff Recommendation No. 1 apply to Tax Lot 2400 instead of Tax Lot 2500 as written. He then explained that in the discussions he had recently with NPO #1 it was acknowledged the desig- nations of zoning was "broad brush" rather than literally on a lot-by- lot basis, and should be so construed when considering this property. There was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY. CROSS-EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL: J. B. Bishop, owner of property on the west side of the highway and elsewhere in the vicinity asked about the traffic light at Garrett Street, and as to whether action on this request might be considered a precedent for up-zoning requests on his nearby properties. (No definite response was given to either question.) COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Bonn stated his reasons for S approval of the request. Popp, upon questioning by the President, could only hazard a guess as to why the property was zoned as it is. He could not see adverse effects from this revision and favored the proposal. Popp thereupon MOVED approval of Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 5-79, based on Staff Findings and Recommendation as twice amended. Helmer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 5.3 SUBDIVISION S 13-79 (Studio Estates) NPO #6 A request for an appeal by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cowger and Mrs. Golden of the approval decision by the Planning Director in reference to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Development Corporation on a half acre lot in the R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development" Zone located at approximately 500' east of Alderbrook Drive on Durham Rd. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11DC, Tax Lot 14200). Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS of the appeal, together with the Staff Recommendations dated November 1, 1979, on Final Action taken by the Planning Director to the original request dated October. 18, 1979. The APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION was made by the three individuals who IF appealed the Planning Director's decision: MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 Page 5. tv � *** Mrs. Elisabeth N. Golden, 15850 SW Oak Meadow Lane *** Robert C. Cowger, 15915 SW Oak Meadow Lane *** Dawn Kreick (representing the Kreick family) , 9185 SW Durham Speaking also in support of the appeal were: *** James D. Lindsey, 15880 SW Oak Meadow Lane *** Mrs. Grace Chapman, 15915 SW Oak Meadow Lane. The four Summerfield residents agreed at the time they purchased their sites this lot had been represented to them as landlocked until the Kreick property was purchased by TDC, until which time it would be a sort of green area. The history of the initial September hearing (which was withdrawn) was mentioned, and that without any notice to the neighbors construction work was commenced on a Saturday and Sunday in November. It was brought out that the remaining vacant lots and the surrounding neighborhood is single-family residences only, and strong opposition was voiced to duplex, townhouse or attached single-family residences on this lot. The question was raised why, if this is Studio Estates instead of Summerfield, the residents should be entitled to the Summerfield privileges and responsibilities. The additional impact of another access on Durham Road, and the impact of four residences instead of only two at this place, was objected to. Mrs. Golden felt Finding of Fact No. respect per speed 8 with res ect to enforcement of the 20-mile er hour s limit past the high school was not factual. Mr. Cowger advocated two detached single-family residences on two lots, instead of two duplex- type buildings on four lots. Mr. Lindsey asked for clarification of what is proposed as to Durham Road access, and time enough to get legal counsel to protest effectively. CROSS-EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL: Bill McMonagle spoke on behalf of Roy Brown, the original applicant-owner, because Mr. Brown was ill and unable to be present. Mr. McMonagle explained his position as an engineer who for some years has been connected with the development of Durham Road and Summerfield. He detailed the history of Durham Road: before Summerfield it was scheduled to be an arterial, but the County Y did not have the funds to develop it as such, and the NPO subsequently Y P ► q reclassified it as a collector street. As to Summerfield: originally the whole parcel owned by the Kreicks, consisting of their present residence and most of Summerfield No. 11 east of Alderbrook, was under option to Tualatin Development Company, and the initial plan for this section was approved on that basis. For whatever reason the Kreicks did not sell their present homesite. Numerous attempts have been made by TDC to purchase all or portions of this property, without success. He illustrated on the blackboard the access planned for the Kreick property, when developed, and Studio Estates, with access in line with 92nd Avenue and elimination of the present Kreick access and the proposed temporary Studio Estates access. He explained the plan to build two two-unit townhouses on this half acre. He presented this traffic MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 Page 6 pattern as being the best available under the present land ownership. Mr. Lindsey raised the question whether this property is Summerfield: • if it is, by what authority are townhouses put into this single-family section of Summerfield; if it isn't, should Summerfield privileges and responsibilities apply to the residents? Selby replied that this parcel • was included in the original approval of 1269 living units in the total Summerfield development, approved in 1972. Plat No. 11 (this area) was developed as single-family residences. The Swptember hearing was for a conditional use for duplexes, which represented a substantial change in the nature of the planned development in this area. The applicant withdrew this application in order to come back with a single-family concept, Studio Estates, which then became for the Planning • Department an in-house matter because no significant change from the original plan was contemplated. (The type of land use--single-family residences--was not changed by this concept.) Discussion revealed that Roy Brown, a vice president of Tualitan Development Company, purchased this half acre from TDC subsequent to the application for the September hearing and now owns it as an indi- vidual. Since there was a notable lack of agreement as to what the actual k .3> legal situation for this parcel is with respect to the original Summer- field plat and applicable zoning, the President closed the public hearing. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Popp proposed a motion referring this back to Staff for clarification. Speaker asked particularly that the status of the Summerfield deed restrictions on this property be ascertained. Howard asked the Commission instead to take such action as would bring a completely new application for consideration by Staff and presentation to the Commission. Thereupon the motion for referral to Staff was withdrawn. Bonn then MOVED the appeal of Subdivision S 13-79 be upheld, and that the fee for a new application on this parcel be waived. The motion was seconded by Helmer and passed unanimously. The President declared a five-minute recess at 10:05. 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) NPO #4 A request by Mr. Keith VanEtten for a Conditional Use to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3.51 acre parcel zoned C-3 "General Commercial" located at 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1,C1 36DA, Tax Lot 900). Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS. 1 MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 22, 1980 Page ? The APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION was made by Steve Nelson, Assistant to the President of U-Haul Company of Oregon. He presented a series of photographs of the company's installation in Longview,..Washington, which is similar to what is proposed for this site. Their facilities are designed for the amateur mover rather than professionals, and the storage is for household effects. Because of the slope, only three buildings will be visible from the highway. The project will be built in phases starting from the front, going down the hill as the business requires. LeRoy V. Thomas, engineer for the project, with offices at 10211 SW Barbour Boulevard, inquired of Staff the effect and operation of Condition 4 pertaining to the sensitive lands portion of the tract. Selby explained the options, and what would be required if the sensi- tive lands portion were to be developed. Mr. Thomas reported they have a preliminary topographic map of the site Qrhich had not yet been presented to the Staff), and that they were especially concerned with the soils stability. They expect to use the City of Bremerton scheme for on-site storm drainage. He stated if the lowest building proved unfeasible they • would eliminate it. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: There was considerable discussion of what procedure would best advance this proposal. Staff p pointed out the reasons for one more hearing, and the nature of the motion desired. The applicant will have to determine what action is to be taken with respect to the sensitive lands; in any case he will need to submit a detailed topographic map, soils study, drainage plan, and his plan for development for what might be considered a PD General Plan Review. Incorporating the Staff's suggestions, Popp MOVED approval of the U-Haul rental-storage concept for this site, with the condition the applicant return with detailed soils tests and plans showing how they intend to handle the sensitive lands, together with the other eleven Staff Recommendations applicable to Conditional Use CU 26-79. It was pointed out that if the City Council does not approve the Zone Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 18.32 allowing warehouse storage as a conditional use, this application is of none effect. The motion was seconded by Helmer and passed unanimously. • There was no OLD BUSINESS or NEW BUSINESS to come before the meeting. On motion the meeting adjourned at 10:45. ;1 C 1' "PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET" NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON INDICATED ITEM(S) . / AGENDA ITEM: ,• / AL ,..f.„, REFERENCE: L y- ?-2 DATE: / Z.2!/(0 111 tl NAME ADDRESS 74)11. hic PIAAL4p, 5 (3kt WI IL v._ .� . _ . ,. .A. I Sd ( SC4) (o - Gf'I/ e. / I-1,52 U s w 9 4 11 . AGENDA ITEM: 5 Z it.( /4/ REFERENCE: C� � /` DATE: � NAME ADDRESS 6`r(5ery (/' `Yjn �e.-- AGENDA ITEM: 5:3 J1a 4=: /r-,:tJ REFERENCE: •s 05-79 DATE: NAME ADDRESS 'l 4 / ' ' S I�_ 610 /SffSa Sw ©J - v I�►-/ )23 . I 1__,,6,d,,,,,,,.„c„.,_ Z, ,.°-1 e S /SY i s 5'41\. 6-44,. .tiv-Au)./ f-e-,-.+i0' -'' . > -- , yi 9/15- s& ,e- ►d-9 %(■ .a9214C, , ...ZAMcS r, 11,A-- sc7( /SSSo Iry 61K ktoloow LA). ic,trao 639 7Z IS //'l/ //----W/4//v/4-5-/Lx- s-'-‘e", �Id (S7- -� . ' r 1 j.vV h"?e titi ro 1.4-2 "---) in arLi �. 1614'60 /6-7 35 ,cv 2�a'� C i¢3gs7�ss S "PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN—UP SHEET" NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRIATE SIGN—UP SHEET(S) , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON l?. INDICATED ITEM(S) . nn AGENDA ITEM: 54 a—/d-C. REFERENCE: G� 24 -79 DATE: /'/2 NAME ADDRESS E-' AGENDA ITEM: REFERENCE: DATE: NAME ADDRESS { y AGENDA ITEM: REFERENCE: DATE: NAME ADDRESS STAFF REPORT • AGENDA 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 - 7:30 pm Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard DOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 4-79 (Mr. Gary F. Oxley) APPLICANT: MDS INVESTMENT INC. OWNER: Mr. Peter Murphy Sr. 730 Benjamin Franklin Bldg. 1036 Pacific Bldg. Portland, Oregon 97258 Portland, Oregon 97204 APPLICATION DATE: November 8, 1979 LOCATION SITE: Northwest corner of SW Naeve Street and SW 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 500) REQUEST: For a comprehensive Plan Revision from "Suburban Low Density Residential" to "Urban Medium Density" on 10.27 acres. NPO #6 I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The site is zoned Washington County RS-1 and is designated A-2 "Urban Medium Density" on the south end and R-20 "Suburban Low Density" on the north. 2. The applicant proposes to create a planned development district zone on the subject site with clustered housing and open space. (See Exhibit "B") 3. The NPO #6 Plan has designated the northern portion of the site to be two (2) dwelling units per gross acre due to the steep slopes and other reasons as expressed in the NPO #6 Plan, Pages 2 and 3. Policy's #1 and #5 indicate the need for Planned Development and clustered housing in this area. 4. The subject site slopes range from 12% to 25% from SW Naeve Road north to the 350 foot contour. From the 350 foot elevation to the 370 foot contour, the grade is in excess of 25%. The northeast corner of the site is less than 12% grade. 5. The surrounding land uses consist of a single family home and vacant land to the north; the Canterbury Condominiums to the northeast; single family units and open fields to the east. To the south is a single family unit and vacant land, and to the southeast is the Summerfield Planned Development. To the west are large vacant parcels with one single family home. 6. SW Naeve and SW 109th are designated as local streets on the NPO #6 Plan. 7. Sewer service is not available to the site. It is anticipated that a main line to this area will be approximately two years away. • STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 1 January 8, 1980 CPR 4-79 Page 2 II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS 1. The sensitive lands should be protected. Staff feels that "adequate" density can be achieved if the units are "clustered" on the northern and southern ends of this site. This will allow a large open space area between the clustered units thus protecting the majority of the sensitive land area. 2. The street layout for this parcel is critical. Due to the slope of the ground, it is mandatory that streets are designed from 109th west to the clusters. . Streets north and south should be eliminated. In emergency situations in winter weather, vehicles would be unable to serve this area if the north/south street configuration were used. 3. Special emphasis should be given to site drainage. At this time no drainage system is available and sewer service is not available. Tualatin Development Company is responsible for the construction of the 108th and Durham Road gravity line to the Tualatin Interceptor. When they will construct this line is unknown. Capacity of the pressure system serving a portion of Summerfield has been reached; and no additional permits will be issued. 4. Naeve Road is unimproved. 109th Avenue is unimproved from Canterbury Woods to Summerfield. Mrs. Anderson to the north has requested annexation to the City and development is anticipated. This should mean that 109th Avenue will be improved to the northern edge of this parcel. The property to the east is outside the City. Half street improvements to 109th and Naeve Road are not appropriate due to the fact that people living in these proposed units must return to them on the "unimproved portion of the street". A local improvement district is possible, but the applicant will have to initiate the L.I.D. 5. Staff feels that a Planned Development Designation is mandatory in this instance because of the sensitive lands area and the utility service problems. Calculations of density allowing for a full 20% increase after removing the sensitive lands area and street dedications amounts to forty (40) clustered units. This is fifty (50) units less than proposed. The open space should be maintained by the homeowners through an agreement to be approved by the City. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports a Comprehensive Plan Revision for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. No zone map amendment application be allowed until sewer service is available to the site. The gravity line from SW 108th and SW Durham to the Tualatin Interceptor must be completed before any development is allowed in this general ,�� area. At the zone map amendment approval, the following conditions should be #°��;- • required with others as necessary at the time. IL t r STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 CPR 4-79 Page 3 1. All development take place under a Planned Development Designation. 2. Density be specific as to area allowed after sensitive lands are removed from the calculations. 3. Detailed site drainage plans be provided by the applicant for review by the Public Works Director. 4. Half street improvements to local street standard with sufficient addition improvements along the frontage of SW 109th and SW Naeve Road to insure adequate access. Engineering plans shall be approved with construction costs to be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. /' Prepared by Ken/ e' lby Approved by Aldi . o. ard As o fate City Planner P1. in• Director ■ C. 1 vmc • STAFF REPORT lab AGENDA 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard DOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 5-79, McCoy Property APPLICANT: Mr. J. F. McCoy OWNER: Same 13285 SW Howard Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 APPLICATION DATE: December 12, 1979 SITE LOCATION: Northeast corner of SW Garrett Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CB, Tax Lots 2400 and 2500) REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Revision from the designated C-P "Commercial Professional" and A-2 "Multi Family" to C-3 "General Commercial" on the 1.23 acre subject parcels PREVIOUS ACTION: On May 20, 1974, the City Council adopted the NPO #1 Plan which designates the subject site as C-P and A-2. I. FINDINGS OF FACT: e1 are presently zoned C-3 "General Commercial" and are 1. Th,. subject parcels a . J P P Y designated C-P "Commercial Professional" on the 107.35 by 175 feet portion adjacent east of Pacific Highway. The remaining southern portion is designated as A-2 "Multi Family" (See exhibit "A") . 2. The applicant is requesting the land use designation change to be continuous with the present zoning (C-3) and the intended commercial use which will be consistent with the commercial activities along SW Pacific Highway. 3. On December 5, 1979, the NPO #1 advisory committee reviewed Mr. McCoy's CPR request. After a lengthy discussion, the committee moved and approved the following decision on a vote of four to two: That the land use designation on lots 2400 and 2500 of Tax Map 2S1 2CB be revised from C-P and A-2 to C-P "Commercial Professional". 4. There is a vacant house on the Tax Lot 2400andthe land slopes gently from west to east. Tax Lot 2500 is vacant and the topography slopes from west to east into a natural drainage area with heavy vegetation along the southern end of the site. STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.2 It CPR 5-79 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1979 Page 2 5. The surrounding land areas consist of a medical clinic to the West across SW Garrett, the Tigard School District Office to the north across SW Pacific Highway, the Pizza Merchant and Mr. !°C" Camera Shop to the -northeast and apartments to the south, southeast and southwest. 6. SW Garrett Street is designated to be local street in the NPO #5 Plan and currently has 40 feet of right-of-way. SW Garrett is a dity street. SW Pacific Highway is a state owned arterial. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The subject parcel development as a commercial use will buffer the existing apartments to the south from the traffic on SW Pacific Highway. 2. The existing drainage is a natural buffer between the apartments to the south and the subject parcel. 3. The existing uses along SW Pacific Highway, east of the site are retail commercial uses. Therefore, the continuation of the subject site as commercial uses will be consistent. 4. The NPO #1 Advisory Committee recommends that the Planning Commission revise the land use designation on the subject parcels to all C-P "Commercial Professional". Their reasoning on a four to two vote was that the C-P designation would be better suited for the area. However, the Planning Staff feels that the site is a logical location for a retail commercial use since 1 it fronts on the corner of an intersection that will be supervised with the transportation systems management improvements and that the use of the site will be similiar to the surrounding commercial land uses. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Comprehensive Plan Revision be approved as requested by the applicant subject to the following condition. 1. That the applicant receive a Planned Development District Designation on Tax Lot 2500 to adequately deal with the sensitive lands condition on the site. Prepared by Ken ! .y, Approved by Aldie � ard, Assof ate City Planner Planni, +irector li • I VnIc -s /BAc "•s'F -" \ 2 q ", , II11,PI / � S'o / Ilj' Hs3o °'..\ 9t / ii�� 4 3 �. w ,111j11 p 6 3200`' -, aka` `� 3 /iilln a y 20A :. •is 11,11 93 e V X 1-kiB �-�— „ ` 111 2700 S� ° ti* a `� ti 1111i11 / s `. tC.S.No.it9C 90 )� 'fad r 3 +V/'�I�' S�+^"'_� 111111i1111111�111' }`\\ �/ CAC -(^ trk- r0/ 0 l\ 2 %'€ / ®t 5-r - c-i o11 1,1 Il�1 9py� 500 -°5 . , 11111 .25Ac 6� / ✓� Oil y¢.ti 2 600 r° r� •K , \! ,�Cv ,i s / I�IIIIII 5a 74Ac. T 330Q J F, 4O� .k / 111111111,1 piw 4 AsererA A n* 3B .41.4C a� .27A c. • a�� 111111 I i (C s. 12690)Z\\ / 2500 3S o 1c:1i1iiiiIIIIIiikI 20Ac. 2® 2°F 194. % • 300 °,,,,,-.5,4 IIQ111111 ,� ''�wxn- ,�',s,L `6a I 27A c. 6�F F 1ii1111i c, m 44. ssy ,3. C4) s�'�9J�, j10111i111111 / s _ �P���2400 y¢ b s 3400 3 / ' ''y 0 apa� �[\ I plll 1111111 q�' _ �/.' ap / 90 i I �/ \ 11 .1.`s,so . v"rC \\ ,pit 2 3 01 ',sz � r x \ `o' /07 AC s \ y, `- r °a ,,' ,.: F Pe-JD,cAb CL101,— r a a\ \ \\ 301 / \ zyne'. '\ 42Ac. F f\ 'a\ .� / \ tt 47301 Ai �„ ' S \ 1� . : O`�t \, ` \ k 3 t. ,l ?\ GN ,. \ ■ \ p. ti o ,P It, a+ 99-- \ X A \ o S. c ii"\i' seg¢I]W se�s,r tit C. >Npo ` ° �-� 6) p\ ' i \ s° �� 2300 `1� 350 3401, 6 ,1. \ .2.3'AC. 30Ac. Ac_ \ _. - -- \-- e i • p \ p o. �n .9 ,.-� by 7' 94 . .I�.` iy a ya`O `9.' )06,-17 1.," / _ / C1 ,� .i4 Q2 e\ . ,.' 1 ?c ti 3503 s r G. \5 . s9 , •714c. \ z-.. . y 1r r�� `! 2 2 0 0 .. 26,4c. ��,' , , ' ‘ 0 00 G a (, i� EN 3501 -r .0- 3700 x, ''!� 2t�� , tas1M .29Ac1\ . r1 r `.`.,o 594c. 6 106 I� ti9 : ��, ( '. \A6° qw \ `�9¢ '`' 3800 - L / 2 i�3=ri ° 360Q } \6 .60Ac. cal°v�rp� 3500_ z - so • 100 .45Ac. � ,• 2a A,- �, 6oOZ . q r 6z¢ �r 45224 1/Ir \ 0.°, p 3 `• a I 0 3 . � ...r.'" N 6 2 '` '.YS 1 ( •\A-11./•_, ^10 m m I, 'r„ ,A i inss� �, ,b. _, g0 43Q0 • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.3 Tigard Planning Commission January 8, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard DOCKET: SUBDIVISION S 13-79 (Studio Estates, RE: ZC 5-79 and Preliminary Plat #11 of Phase IV S 2-76) APPLICANT: Mr. Roy Brown OWNER: Same 15300 SW 116th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATION DATE: November 20, 1979 SITE LOCATION: Approximately 500' east of Alderbrook Drive on Durham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11DC, Tax Lot 14200) . REQUEST: An appeal by Mr. Kreick, Mr. Cowger and Mrs. Golden to the approval decision by the Planning Director in reference to the Preliminary Plat Subdivision request by the Tualatin Development Corporation on a half acre lot in the R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Development" Zone. PREVIOUS ACTION: Attached is a copy of the Staff Report approving the Subdivision request of November 1, 1979 by the Planning Director. (See Exhibit "A") I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Between the dates of November 20th, and the 21st, three letters of appeal were received by the City in reference to the Studio Estates (S 13-79) Subdivision application. (See Exhibit's "B", "C", and "D") II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The Staff Report dated November 1, 1979, and the supplementary information serve a s the recorded record of evidence to review in reference to the appeal to formulate a decision. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the decision of the Planning Director. Prepared by Ken I .y, Approved by Aldie +'ward, Asso, - City Planner Plan iii Director a vmc STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 7:30 pm Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut St. , Tigard DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE CU 26-79 (U-Haul of Oregon) AP•P,IIQANT: U-HAUL COMPANY OF OREGON OWNER: Thomas J. & Laurie S. Reid 8816 SE Foster Road 11552 SW Pacific Highway Portland, Oregon 97266 Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPLICATION DATE: November 19, 1979 LOCATION SITE: 11552 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36DA, Tax Lot 900) REQUEST: For a Conditional Use to operate a vehicle rental and storage facility on a 3.51 acre parcel zoned C-3 "General Commercial". PREVIOUS ACTION: On June 20, 1978, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use request by Western Oregon Marine to operate a retail boat sales/repair business and outside storage on the subject site with conditions. (See Exhibit "A") Air I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The site is designated on the NPO #4 Plan as Highway Commercial and currently zoned C-3 General Commercial. 2. The applicant requests a Conditional Use (see attached narrative) permit to operate a U-Haul Vehicle rental facility with storage in accordance with Section 18.28.020 (5) of the Tigard Municipal Code Permitting Automobile, boat and trailer sales; and in accordance with Section 18.12.030 Authorization of Similar Uses. 3. The applicant proposes to construct seven (7) warehouse storage facilities on the back half of the subject site. (See attached site plans) 4. On January 28, 1980, the City Council will consider the approval of a zone ordinance amendment to Section 18.28 and 18.36 which will allow warehouse facilities for storage in the C-3 and C-5 zones. 5. The site is currently occupied by two buildings totaling approximately 9000 square feet. The older shop building will be removed. The southern one-third of the lot drops off sharply in excess of 25% into a natural drainage way on the edge of Red Rock Creek. STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION CU 26-79 January 8, 1980 Page 2 6. Surrounding property to the west is Mark 50 Machinery; to the north and across Pacific Highway is the Fred Meyer Shopping Center; to the east Rasmussen's Chevron Service; and to the south the O.E.A. complex. 7. Access to and from the site would be on Villa Ridge (a frontage road that parallels Pacific Highway) . The site is approximately midway between the north and south egress of Villa Ridge with Pacific Highway, which lessens the impact on traffic entering the frontage road or attempting to merge into the Pacific Highway flow. 8. Over the last several years a transition has taken place in the type of business that had previously occupied sites along the frontage road. What before was essentially an industrially oriented mixture of uses is now undergoing a change to commercial retail. The proposed use would be in keeping with this trend, as well as meeting the objectives of the Community Plan as it pertains to site accessibility and minimizing the inherent conflict between the safe, rapid movement of through traffic and shopper traffic on major streets. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The proposed use would be compatible with surrounding land uses and not represent a significant increase over the traffic generated by the previous business on the site. 2. Villa Ridge Drive requires some paving and sidewalk improvements. 3. The applicant has pointed out (in narrative dated November 12, 1979) and staff agrees that the subject property location lends itself to this type of operation and it will not adversely affect the traffic circulation or the surrounding properties. 4. Proper landscaping will screen and enhance the property. 5. The proposed use is in compliance with the land use designation of the Caprehensive Plan and is a similar use to the Conditional Use allowed in the C-3 zone if Council adopts Section 18.28 Revision. 6. There are two issues involved in this application. One is the approval to operate a rental vehicle business with warehouse storage and the second is the proposed construction in asensitive lands area. Due to delayed studies, the applicant was unable to prepare the necessary information required in Section's 18.57.060 (B) and (C) of the Tigard Municipal Code to properly address this issue. Therefore, the applicant requests that the Special Use Permit be submitted through the staff at a later date. STAFF REPORT/AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION January 8, 1980 CU 26-79 Page 3 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Request subject to the following conditions: 1. That the City Council approves the zone ordinance amendment to Chapter 18.32 allowing warehouse storage as a Conditional Use. If the amendment is denied, the approval of the use of warehousing will be prohibited. 2. That the applicant receive site design approval. 3. That street improvements on Villa Ridge be made to the approval of the State Highway and the City's Public Works departments prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. That the applicant abandon plans to build in the sensitive lands area or receive Special Use Permits prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. 6. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 7. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 8. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 9. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 10. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval.. 11. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. Prepared by Ken Selby, Approved by Al i oward, Associate C' Planner P1 Director vmc 1/3/80 - STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD 11,, 12420 SW Main St. , December 20, 1979 DOC.&ET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 62-79, COLUMBIA HARDWOOD & MOULDING/H. WM. GAZELEY APPIZCANT Mr. H. William Gazeley OWNER: Same • 12700 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 j! SITE {;4 LOCATION: 12700 SW Hall Blvd. Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1, Tax Lot 600 SITE DESIGNATION: M-3, Light Industrial on NPO #5 Plan ki PARKING REQUIRED: ? New bui.id gat 28,532.5 square feet Industrial for storage requires one ;Q) space per 1,500 square feet or nineteen (19) spaces required in this case. Thirty (30) spaces have been provided as shown on the Site Plan. PREVIOUS ACTION: Reference SDR 18-73, SDR 20-75, SDR 38-77, SDR 19-79, M 6-79 Special Use Permit Floodplain. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: if 1. Site Drainage Plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Director prior to k";I issuance of Building Permits. 2. A fire hydrant shall be within 250 feet of this structure. k" E:?a • 3. The asphalt roadway on the northern property line will be kept clear of all vehicles and posted with "no parking" signs. This will allow easy access to the rear• of the property for emergency vehicles. t-: 4. The landscaped area along Hall Blvd./"State Highway 217" shall be upgraded. r, All dead plant materials will be replaced and new bark dust shall be added. k,: . 5. No asphalt paving in the proposed new parking lot shall take place. Gravel only shall be used. 6. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department_ STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD 62-79 December 20, 1979 7. No changes es will be made to approved plans o r specifications ons unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved that de p a rtme nt. Application for changes will be made in writing and. shall include applicable drawings. g Prepared and approved by •or h=E: This _ acknowledgement must be signed and. returned to the of..o ty._ City or s1.gaL'::, Planning Department. Failure to return; this acknowledgement will result in no further action-on this project with regard= to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. • Signature Date "".1 Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's Action. • • STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street December 21, 1979 DOCKET: Site Design Review 58-79; Durham Business Park, new application. Reference: SDR 12-77, Original application. ZC 9-76 George Killian zoned M-3PD by Ordinance 77-18 1 1 APPLICANT: Mr. George Killian OWNER: Same Equities Northwest 1618 SW First, P-2 Portland, Oregon 97201 SITE LOCATION 72nd & Boones Ferry Road & DESIGNATION: "M-3PD" Light Industrial Planned Development, NPO #5 PREVIOUS ACTION: ZC 9-76 to M-3PD. Several conditions were added,. #2, #3, #4, #6. On December 15, '- 1978, a SDR 12-77 Staff Report was prepared. No significant development has taken }' place on site. All previous SDR Staff work is hereby nullified. The only document in this case that will be valid is the document dated December 21, 1979 SDR 58-79. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Building One - 12.9 (9370 square feet) Building Two - 14.8 (5170 square feet) Building Three - 12.0 (4200 square feet) Building Four - 19.2 (7690 square feet) Approximately ninety six (96) spaces are shown on the site plan. This number will be decreased slightly if 72nd and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road are re-aligned. SITE PLAN/REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: - I 1. Applicant to sign the petition for a Local Improvement District for 72nd ?> Avenue. Financial responsibility for public improvements to be shared as applicable to total development through L.I.D. Should the L.I.D. not become effective within twelve (12) months, applicant shall be responsible for half street improvements to arterial street standards. 2. Detailed engineering drawings be submitted to the Public Works Director for k. the storm drainage system and all work in a public right-of-way. The City. has some money to apply toward the re-alignment of SW Upper Boones Ferry Raod and 72nd Avenue. Applicant should study the enclosed traffic study and map of proposed changes in this immediate area. Re-alignment of SW Upper Boones Ferry and 72nd will be accomplished prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Applicant will dedicate the necessary right-of-way to comply with the dictates of the Public Works Director following his review of the re-alignment plans by the applicant. • . . , _ , STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW ' 4 SDR 58-79 December 21, 1979 . Page 2 ' 3. Revised site plans to be submitted following engineering changes for street , re-alignment. Parking computation to be provided for conformance to Tigard Municipal Code requirements. 4. Fire hydrants to be within 250 feet of all buildings. Tualatin Rural Fire District to review site plans. Applicant agrees to make necessary changes outlined by Fire Marshall. 5. Landscaping to be added as noted on preliminary site plan in parking lots 1 to north of building #4 and between buildings #4, #2 and #3. 6. All parking areas shall be "directionally striped". Area to north of building #4 should be wider. Remove small "planted area" and expand driveway width. , 7. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all Conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. , 8. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- 1 i ment and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 1 11 9. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal , _ application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 10. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. : 11. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. • 12. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street : lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 13. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty 44y appeal period from the date of approvial... . • 14. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. , Prepared and approved by lann g Director ta4147 NOTE t This acknowledgement mu e signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result dirin no further action on this project With regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Sivature Nit. . • . . , , ,. . ,_,. . . A . LT' . . a , I C • I 1 t, STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW 4j SDR 58-79 December 21, 1979 i Page 3 1 I. Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) i days of the Planning Director's Action. , 1 1' il 1 I I fi. Il 1 i ii ,lr 5 r�L3�i I R� i 9h rt, vmc STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street December 21, 1979 DOCKET: Site Design Review SDR 47-79, B & B Development APPLICANT: B & B Development 9221 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, OR 97219 SITE LOCATION: Shady Lane approximately 160 feet east of Greenburg Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35B, Tax Lots 201 & 203) SITE DESIGNATION: C-3 "General Commercial" Zone PREVIOUS ACTION: Reference CONDITIONAL USE CU 23-79 SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to dedicate all land within the floodplain below 162' elevation to the City. 2. Full half-street improvements to local street standard shall be made to SW Shady Lane prior to issuance of Building Permits. i 3. A drainage plan and site grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Shared driveway easement documents shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits. Documents to be approved by Public Works Director. 5. Landscaping shall be added on western boundary line. Handicapped parking stalls shall be added. Ramps to building shall be added in sidewalk and in building approach. 6. Irrigation plan, sign plan, lighting plan, shall be submitted. Tax lots shall be combined prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City, of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. 8. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- a►en t and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. It 9. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW City of Tigard December 21, 1979 Page 2 10. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 11. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 12. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 13. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval. • 14. Imptovement3 may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. Prepared and approved by ie oward, Planning Director NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of r':igar4, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Sic nature Date Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Site Design Review Action. • vmc ft'• i STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW ; Ilt City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street ` December 21, 1979 s:{ t. DOCKET: Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, John Alexander/Burger Boy Restaurant APPLICANT: Mr. John D. Alexander OWNER: Same 1`'. 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 r?,''; t=, SITE LOCATION: 11688 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 1900) E-i SITE r"pr DESIGNATION: C-3 "General Commercial" on 99W § ; PARKING ! ! REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space per each 100 square feet of gross floor area. #.i In this case, the applicant proposed to add to an existing building t ' (1440 square feet) . The addition will be 960 square feet making a e required equal twenty four total of 2400 square feet. Parking spaces r qu q y i., (24) . Applicant shows twenty seven (27) on site plan. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: The most important aspect of this particular site is the fact that there is significant developable land to the south which must be served with transportation { facilities in the near future. NPO #4 clearly outlines the need for a connection from the 1-5, Haines Road interchange west on Dartmouth Street across 72nd Avenue, � � then to the north to intersect with 89W. This property is the "key" to development ,: of this proposed street system. At this time, the property owner directly to the west (Robert Randall Company) , t has approached Staff with a development proposal. This applicant clearly t,. understands the need for the NPO #4 street system and realizes that he must cooperate fi.•; with surrounding property owners and has agreed verbally to do so. Mr. Alexander, in this case, has agreed verbally to cooperate also. } ' One proposal is to bring the Darmouth extension to 99W through, between the ` , Chalet Pancake House property and the Burger Boy Restaurant for a four way r. intersection with Pfaffle Street through the Marine Lumber Company property. At f a meeting earlier this year with the people in this area, there was a great deal of � . discussion concerning this proposal. Since that time, Mr. Gordon Martin has not 1L' advanced his development plans for a large amount of property directly behind P Mr. Alexander's property. Staff still has the responsibility to carry through dl with the NPO #4 plan for streets. i-a< f' Staff's position is that the Oregon Department of Transportation must be satisfied 1::,:\ with any plans affecting 99W. Due to the fact that we now have adjoining property t ' owners who wish to develop, it seems logical to suggest that the location of the ill 99W entry for property to the south be through Tax Lots 1800, 1801 and 1900. (.q r"i i, • STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW ;L SDR 61-79 December 21, 1979 Page 2 Staff is attempting here to formally notify this applicant that significant events in the future require that he dedicate a portion of his property for street improvements and share in the cost of these improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project with the following conditions: 1. Property frontage along 99W be improved by adding sidewalks, curbs, gutters and storm drainage. Plans for all work in the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Director of Tigard. All work in the public right-of-way on 99W shall also be approved by Mr. Ron Kleinschmidt of the Oregon Department of Transportation, 238-7437, prior to issuance of Building permits. 2. One curb cut on 99W shall be eliminated. One ingress/egress point shall remain and shall be thirty (30') feet wide with appropriate concrete aprons. 3. The front landscaping area shall be ten (10') feet wide behind the sidewalk installation. Significant vegetation shall be installed to screen the parking lot from the Highway. Site plan to be revised to show screening. 4. Parking spaces along the boundaries of the entire parking lot shall be curbed with cement. Site plan shall be revised to show two landscaped areas in the parking lot. This will provide a break in the large, asphalt visual areas. 5. The existing site sign is to be moved to the landscaped area in front of the building. No changes in the dimension of the sign will be allowed. When relocated, the existing sign shall not exceed fourteen (14') feet in height from the ground level. 6. Fire hydrant to be located not more than 250 feet from buildings. 7. All "Native vegetation" along southern property line is to be trimmed, thinned, and area is to be improved with ground cover. Landscaping area to be added along northeast boundary. Changes to be shown on revised site plan. 8. Applicant to make required dedications, (see rough description attached) and to sign a non-remonstrance agreement for future street improvements for the I-5, Dartmouth to 99W Street System as outlined in the NPO #4 Plan prior to issuance of Building Permits. 0 9. Parking stalls on the revised site plan shall be visable. Traffic circulation arrows on asphalt shall be clearly shown on revised site plan. 10. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. 11. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. • STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 61-79 December 21, 1979 Page 3 , 12. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in, writing and shall include applicable drawings. 13. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 14. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 15, No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval 16. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. Prepared and approved by g r NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of'. Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. signature Date Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to to Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Directors Action. vmc . • • ti • ROUGH DESCRIPTION OF STREET,DEDICATION That portion of Tax Lot 1800 and 1900 1S1 36CD as follows, a 60 foot right-of-way, the center of which is the 'northerly extension, of the east line of Palmer Acres a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County Oregon; the east and west line of said 60 foot right-of-way to extend northerly to the northeast line of said Tax Lot 1800. x i 1 I 1 I ... . ,.... ...:.. -...,.....,.k w . % • r FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT lir TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR January 14, 1980 Tigard City Hall, 12420 SW Main Street ANY PERSON OBJECTING TO THIS ACTION HAS TWENTY (20) DAYS TO FILE AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S ACTION BY FILING SAID WITH THE CITY RECORDER AND PAYING THE APPROPRIATE FEES. DOCKET: MINOR LAND PARTITION, MLP 25-79, James N. Aitken APPLICANT: James N. Aitken OWNER: Same 15705 SW Alderbrook Drive Tigard, Oreogn 97223 APPLICATION DATE: December 10, 1979 LOCATION: 9980 and 9982 SW Johnson Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BB, Tax Lot 1300) REQUEST: To partition an .82 acre parcel into two lots, 11,000 square feet and 24,600 square feet respectively. SITE DESIGNATION: R-7, Single Family Residential PREVIOUS ACTION: A request by the applicant for a minor land partition was approved by the Tigard Planning Commission on February 21, 1977. (Ref. MLP 12-76) This minor land partition was never recorded with the County assessor. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant is requesting permission in accordance with Section 17.24.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code, to partition an .82 acre parcel into 11,000 and 24,600 square feet lots. The intent is to sell the two existing single family houses which exist on these separate lots. 2. The site is designated as "Urban Low Density" - R-7 on the Comprehensive Plan and is currently zoned R-7 Single Family Residential (7,500 square foot minimum lots) . 3. The site is presently occupied by two single family dwellings, a garage and a shed. • The Tigard Municipal Code requires that single fmaily dwellings be "each on a separately described lot, as recorded in the county records", (Section 18.20.010) . The rear house was moved to the site from another location. FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR llr January 14, 1980 MLP 25-79 Page 2 4. Johnson Street is designated as a local street, requiring a 50' right-of-way. The existing right-of-way in front of Lot 1300 is 45' , with 25' of right-of-way between the center line and Lot 1300. 5. The Tigard Municipal Code (Section 18.20.060) requires setbacks of 5' of side yard for single story buildings, a 15' rear yard, and a 20' front yard in an • R-7 Zone. The setbacks of the two exisiting dwellings, the garage, and shed from the proposed lot lines are adequate. 6. The previous unrecorded minor land partition for this site (MLP 12-76) created two lots with different dimensions than the current proposal. 7. A 40' wide access to the rear lot is proposed. The Tigard Municipal Code (Section 18.64.020) requires a minimum 10' access for one dwelling unit to a public street. 8. Surrounding land uses include single family dwellings on the both sides of Johnson Street, Tiger Oil Company to the east on Lot 1800, and a vacant field to the south. 9. The site is presently serviced by sewers and water. l� 10. Johnson Street (between Grant and Brookside Avenue) does not have curbs or sidewalks. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan (NPO #2) and the present zoning. 2. Present use of the site by two dwellings on a single lot is in violation of the zoning code (Section 18.20.010) , which requires single family dwellings to be on separate, recorded lots. Granting this partition will remove the violation of the zoning code and allow a legal sale of the properties. 3. Adequate access to Johnson Street has been provided for the rear lot. 4. The proposed lot sizes exceed the minimum lot size requirement. 5. Water and sewer services are provided to the site. 6. Johnson Street has an adequate right-of-way width in front of this site. FINAL ACTION: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: A FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR p, January 14, 1980 MLP 25-79 Page 3 1. That the applicant construct half street improvements along the frontage of Johnson Street to local street standard prior to the recording of the tax lot partition with the County assessors office. Prepared by Richard Ross, Approved by Al ly' .�1 'ward, Planning Intern Pia Director NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. } Signature Date Special Note. Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's Action. 'r+ Rt. 14 fA v `f FINAL ACTION/TAFF REPORT TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR January 17, 1980 City of Tigard, 12420 S.W. Main Street DOCKET: Subdivision S 1-80 (Kosta Subdivision, Ref: CU 34-78 & CU 27-79) APPLICANT: Mr. James Kosta OWNER: Same 5203 SE 28th Portland, Oregon 97202 ' APPLICATION DATE: January 2, 1980 SITE LOCATION: 13895 SW 104th (wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lot 3101) REQUEST: To subdivide a .61 acre parcel into 6 lots in a R-7 "Single Family Residential" Zone. PREVIOUS ACTION: On December 5, 1978, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use for duplexes by the applicant with conditions. (See Exhibit "A") On December 11, 1979, the Planning Commission approved aconditional use for three attached Single Family units request with conditions. (See Exhibit "3") I. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The site is zoned and designated "Urban Low Density" R-7 on the NPO #1 Plan. 2. The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into 6 lots in conformance with Sections 18.20.020(2) and 17.06.015 of the Tigard Municipal Code. No lot shall have less than 4,225 square feet as required. (See attached site plan) 3. The site is a relatively flat, vacant parcel surrounded by a vacant parcel zoned R-7 to the north, eastward across SW 104th is a single family dwelling and vacant land, southward there is a single family dwelling adjacent to the site while southward across SW McDonald Street there is a large apartment complex, westward there is commercial development that has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. Immediately west adjacent to the site is a tire warehouse and retail store. 4. Sewer and water services are available off SW McDonald and SW 104th. 5. SW 104th is designated in the NPO #1 Plan as a local collector street requiring 50 feet of right-of-way with 34 feet of paving. It is a county street. Ail • FINAL ACTION STAFF REPORT January 17, 1980 S 1-80 Page 2 II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. This request conforms to the density limitations of the R-7 Zone (Single Family Residential) and Urban Low Density Residential designation of the NPO #1 Plan. 2. SW 104th has the adequate right-of-way width, however, street improvements are necessary. 3. All lots are within the minimum square footage as required. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Subdivision subject to the following condition: 1. That the applicant comply with and fulfills the conditions required on the Conditional Use Approval of December 11, 1979 - CU 27-79. Prepared by Ken •y Approved by : . ward Assoy°ate City Planner ` • ' g Director NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature Date Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's Action. vmc STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR January 24, 1980 Tigard City Hall, 12420 SW Main St. DOCKET: MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 20-79 (Jack G. Garvin) APPLICANT: Jack G. Garvin OWNER: Same 435 NE Birchwood Terr. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 APPLICATION DATE: September 7, 1979 SITE LOCATION: 12535 SW Grant (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BB, Tax Lot 1801) REQUEST: To partition a .57 acre parcel into two lots SITE DESIGNATION: R-7, Single Family Residential PREVIOUS ACTION: A request by a previous owner (Finke) for a minor land partition to divide tax 11 lot 1800 into two lots was approved by the Tigard Planning Commission on March 19, 1974 with conditions. (Ref. MLP 1-74) A request by a previous owner (Kelsey) for a minor land partition, for a variance of driveway width, and for a conditional use permit to construct two duplexes was denied by the Tigard Planning Commission on September 7, 1976 and tabled in a re-hearing on February 15, 1977. ' (Ref. MLP 7-76, V 9-76, CU 26-76) FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant is requesting permission, in accordance with Section 17.24.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code to partition a .57 acre parcel into 7,445 and 17,384 square foot lots. The intent is to sell the rear lot and to construct a single family house upon it. • 2. The site is designated as "Urban Low Density" R-7 on NPO #2 Plan and is • currently zoned R-7, 'Single Family Residential". 3. The site is a flat vacant field, except for a single family house in the southeast corner of Tax Lot 1801. 4. Grant Street is designated as a collector street in NPO Plan #2, requiring a sixty (60) foot right-of-way and forty four (44) feet of pavement. The existing right-of-way is forty (40) feet and pavement width is twenty two (22) feet. b • STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR • MLP 20-79 ' P. 2 5. Sewers and water are presently available on Grant Street. 6. On October 15, 1979, the Tigard Planning Director denied a request by the applicant for a minor land partition to divide Tax Lot 1801 into two lots because the owner of adjacent lot 1800 claimed that a ten (10) foot easement strip on the northerly side of her lot had not been granted. Subsequent to this denial, the applicant provided proof that a ten (10) foot easement of record had been granted by a previous owner of Tax Lot 1800, recorded in Book 902, Page 614, Washington County Records. 7. There is a nineteen (19) foot access provided for the existing single family house and a proposed single family house on the rear lot. Combined with ten (10) foot ingress and egress easement on adjacent lot 1800, this provides twenty nine (29) feet of access width. Section 18.64.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires a minimum of twenty (20) feet vehicular access and egress for two dwelling units, with eighty (80%) percent paved (or sixteen (16) feet) . A large Ponderosa Pine stands seven (7) feet south of the north property line of Tax Lot 1801 (subject site) at the intersection of the driveway and SW Grant Street which could restrict driveway width. Exercising fully the ten (10) foot easement over the adjacent lot 1801 would bring the driveway against the foundation of the house on the adjacent lot. a r5, ?�y, 8. Surrounding land uses include Tiger Oil Company and a single family house to (� �" the northeast on Grant Street, single family houses to the north on Johnson Street, a single family house to the southeast on adjacent lot 1800, a large vacant field and a single family house to the southwest on Grant Street. • Across Grant Street from the site is St. Anthony's Church and School grounds. 9. The applicant's original intent was to construct a duplex on the rear lot. • After the Planning Director's initial denial, applicant requested reconsidera- tion of this minor land partition due to new evidence of proper easements. Staff indicated to applicant on January 3, 1980, that adequate access did not exist for a duplex on the rear lot ( minimum access thirty (30) feet, twenty four (24) feet paved) . Applicant stated that he understood the problem and requested that we proceed with the minor land partition since he is interested in selling the lots. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The proposal is in conformance to NPO #2 Plan and in compliance with the present zoning. 2. The proposed lot sizes exceed the minimum lot size requirement. 3. Adequate water and sewer facilities are available to the site. • • emmemmeme • M STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR MLP 20-79I P. 3 4. SW Grant Street requires an additional twenty (20) feet of right-of-way along the frontage of the subject site. S. The combined vehicular access and easement available to the site is twenty nine (29) feet wide, which exceeds the minimum required access required for two dwelling units. Location of the required sixteen (16) foot driveway to the rear lots could be a problem since the large Ponderosa tree at the front of j. the driveway impinges on the most desirable driveway location which should be as far as possible from the existing house on adjacent lot 1800. 6. If the applicant still wishes to construct a duplex on the rear lot, the applicant will have to apply for both a conditional use permit for a duplex in an R-7 zone and a variance to the minimum vehicular access width (for 3 dwelling units) of thirty (30) feet, twenty four (24) feet paved. Considering the Planning Commission's rejection of a similar conditional use and variance request for this site on February 15, 1977, on grounds of inadequate access, single family development of the rear lot appears to be most feasible. FINAL ACTION: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: iF 1. That the applicant dedicate ten (10) feet of right-of-way along the frontage of the site on SW Grant Street:with half street improvements to collector standards prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. Y p r . • 3• Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a B uilding Permit. • 4. No Occupancy permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon • • this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections • verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department, • 5' No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval.. { lir • STAFF REPORT - FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DIRECTOR MLP 20-79 4161Y P. 4 6. Applicant agrees to construct only one single family dwelling on the rear lot. h`' 7. Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, Staff receive detailed drawings of proposed public improvements. Significant trees should be protected. If your Minor Land Partition has been approved and you have signed and returned the acknowledgement, you should now have your partition recorded by the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. You should bring copies of your Partition Map and our Staff Report to the County to facilitate recording. Your Minor Land Partition is not official until it is recorded. 41014 I/111"V Prepared by Richard N. Ross Approved by Planning Intern Pl- g,• - i ctor NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning .Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature Date Special Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's Action. 1 1 vmc tyyt • ,. .,..;. .,.y-. lir STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD 12420 SW Main St. -- February 11, 1980 DOCKET: SABRE WAREHOUSE (addition) , SDR 3-80 (Ref. SDR 39-78, SDR 45-76, MLP 4-75, MLP 13-76) • APPLICANT: John R. Low OWNER: SABRE CONSTRUCTION CO. 1750 SW Skyline Blvd. 7225 SW Bonita Rd. Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, Oregon 97223 SITE LOCATION: SW Landmark Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 600) • DESIGNATION: M2, General Industrial Zone STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of this addition to an existing warehouse and office space with the following condition: . III1. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unlesssformal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings.s.g Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's Action. Approved and prepared by Ald ward, Planning Director AHvmc NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no • further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature, Applicant Date Signature, Owner ___ Date • STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12420 SW Main February 25, 1980 DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 4-80 (ANDRE'S AUTO BODY SHOP/NADEAU) APPLICANT: LINDA NADEAU OWNER: SAME 908A Pecan Court Newberg, OR 97132 SITE LOCATION: 15785 SW 72nd (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12D, Tax Lot 2600) SITE DESIGNATION: M-3/Light Industrial Zone, Permitted Use Section 18.48.010 Tigard Municipal Code, Automobile Repair. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space per 1,000 square feet. 2,400 square feet proposed. 1 Three (3) spaces provided on plan with additional spaces avail- '• able for expansion at later date. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: This is the first building proposed on this site. Future construction will be reviewed by the Planning Staff at a later date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to dedicate necessary right-of-way to allow improvement to 72nd Avenue to collector street standards. (approximately ten (10') feet along property frontage) 2. Applicant to sign Local Improvement District petition for 72nd Avenue now held by the City Recorder. 3. Provisions to be made to irrigate landscaped areas. (Outside hose bibs are sufficient) 4. Sign Permits are required prior to the installation of signs on this property. • • • STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW F. TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 25, 1980 Page 2 • 1. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. • • 2. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- ment and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 3. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. • 4. Grading plans and construction plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. . ' • 5. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 07. , 4 6,. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. • 7. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day• appeal period from the date of approval, . 8. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the. Public Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a,Building Permit. Action of the Site Design Review is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Site Design Review Action. PREPARED i ' REPA_RE AND APPROVED BY ALD � • ARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR vmc • This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no ,further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. • VJ SIGNATURE _ DATE it . STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12420 SW Main . March 4, 1980 DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 2-80, (Gary Reid) APPLICANT: Gary Reid, Inc. OWNER: Same 12700 SW 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97223 SITE LOCATION: 10060 SW Katherine Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BB, Tax Lots 100 and 200) SITE DESIGNATION: M-4PD. Ordinance No. 80-17 (Lot 200) - Ordinance No. 78-35 (Lot 100) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space per 1,000 square feet. Proposed building area is N, 4k 17,600 square feet. Seventeen (17) spaces required. twenty four IF (24) provided. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: The major emphasis placed on development of this site is the compatibility factor in relation to adjacent residential areas. Access to the site is another major concern. "No business traffic should be allowed to enter/exit Katherine Street". Staff was instructed to work with the applicant to explore the possibility of a joint-access agreement with R.A. Gray and Company of Tigard Industrial Park. This effort was unsuccessful. It is possible, however, to move the access/egress point to the eastern property line so that Katherine Street is "protected" to some degree. Applicant has agreed to change the configuration of the building to minimize the "concrete wall effect". Roof lines over the office areas will be changed. Applicant has agreed to reduce the height of the warehouse sections to less than eighteeen (18) feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Ordinance No. 78-35 and Ordinance No. 80-17 shall be met. 2. Landscaping area facing Katherine Street and along entire western property line shall be raised to provide maximum screening effect between development and surrounding residential area. Planting materials shall be selected which provide maximum visual screen in these areas and mature stock shall be used. • STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT SDR 7-80 March 4, 1980 Page 2 3. Applicant shall provide detailed plans which address the protection of children on Katherine Street relative to school bus operations and general use of Katherine Street. Staff suggests crosswalks, a bus shelter, and appropriate signing. 4. Applicant to submit revised plans showing building elevations. Building height should be kept as low as possible. The determining factor is the depth of the sewer line connection which will allow gravity flow. This factor. shall be reviewed by the Public Works Director and building height adjusted accordingly. Particular attention shall be given to office construction. on Tax Lot 200. (See conditions in Ordinance No. 80-17.) Only offices shall be constructed on this lot. 5. Applicant shall combine Tax Lot 100 and Tax Lot 200 through Washington County. Action of the Site Design Review is final unless notification of .appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Record within twenty (20) days of the Site Design Review Actio Prepared and approved by • H. , Planning Director AHvmc This acknowledgement must be signed geed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature Date • 4 ANNOMMIIM STAFF REPORT ;' FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12420 SW Main Street April 4, 1980 DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 8-80 (Koll Business Center) NPO #7 APPLICANT: Del Zander OWNER: SAME 8253 SW Cirrus Drive Beaverton, Oregon 97005 APPLICATION DATE: March 25, 1980 SITE LOCATION: South of Scholls Ferry Road, west of Southern Pacific Railroad (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34AA, Tax Lots 100, .190 and 200 _- Lots are being recorded thorugh Washington County as Lot 2, Koll Business Center, Tigard) REQUEST: Site Plan and Design Review for Koll Business Center, Tigard PREVIOUS ACTION: REFERENCE: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 23-78; ZONE CHANGE, ZC 26-78; CONDITIONAL USE, CU 33-78; SUBDIVISION, S 11-79 SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: The applicant is proposing to construct eleven C11) buildings in an approved M-4 "Industrial Park" Zone under a Planned Development District designation. Conditional Uses are allowed as evidenced in application's.narrative Section IV, Page 40. This application fulfills Condition #5 of Zone Change, ZC 26-78 a Site Design Review -Condition#9 of Zone Change, ZC 26-78 has been satisfied. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Site Design Review application with the following conditions: 1. Traffic signal installation agreement be approved by all parties. 2. Sublease - Greenway - Floodplain agreement be approved by all parties. 3. Applicant to apply for Zoning Ordinance Amendment if additional uses are desired in the future which have not been granted to date on this project. 4. Plan to be approved by Washington County District Number One Fire Marshall. Letter of approval to be made as part of this record. • • M STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION ` TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT � , ' SDR 8-80 (Moll Bus. Center) April 4, 1980 Page "2 S. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon • s this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections Verifying this have been. carried out by the appropriate department. 7. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless formal application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- ment and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 8. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 9. Grading plans and construction plans on all public right-of--ways shall be submitted Ind approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 10. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed' to this site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. f.,:cf, 11. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 12. No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval. i 13. Improvements may be bonded prior to. issuance of Building Permits. 14. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a Building Permit. • Prepared b ef . Ad arming Director AHvmc STAFF NOTE: A personal note of appreciation to Sonna Durdell of Koll and Rick Saito of McKenzie - Thanks for being so co-operative. If I can help you in any way - just ask. • if____ . .. „ ., . , ,. _ r ATTACHMENT ft STAFF REPORT SDR 8-80 (Koll Business Center) April 4, 1980 NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. 3 ,, Signature (Contact Person) Date Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of the Planning Director's action. 1 i It STAFF REPORT ' SITE DESIGN REVIEW May 13, 1980 City •of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 8-80 PHASE II - KOLL BUSINESS CENTER OFFICE BUILDING NPO #7 APPLICANT: Del Zander OWNER: Same 8253 SW Cirrus Drive Beaverton, Oregon 97005 APPLICATION DATE: May 5, 1980 REQUEST: Site Design Review of Roll Business Center, Phase II - Building A - Office Building. LOCATION: South of Scholls Ferry Road, west of Southern Pacific Railroad (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34AA, Tax Lots 100, 190,and 200 - Lots are being recorded through Washington County as Lot 2, Koll Business Center, Tigard) . PREVIOUS ACTION: See Exhibit "A", Staff Report for Phase I SDR 8-80. SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: The applicant is proposing to construct a 32,000 square foot, two (2) story office building in conjunction with the eleven (11) building warehouse complex off Scholls Ferry Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Phase II Office building as submitted. The Conditions outlined in SDR 8-80 (Exhibit "A" attached) Phase I shall be met as appropriate to as development takes place. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall inc app ' able drawings. -■• ping Director NO`' : This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature DATE ' ='�" i STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12420 SW Main Street April 4, 1980 • DC=ET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 8-80 (Koli Business Center) NPO #7 APPLICANT: Del Zander OWNER: SAME 8253 SW Cirrus Drive Beaverton, Oregon 97005 APPLICATION DATE: March 25, 1980 SITE LOCATION: South of Scholls Ferry Road, west of Southern Pacific Railroad (Wash. Co.. Tax Map 1S1 34AA, Tax Lots 100, 19Q and 200,- Lots are being recorded thorugh Washington County as Lot 2,' Koll Business Center, Tigard) REQUEST: Site Plan and Design Review for Koll Business. Center, Tigard PREVIOUS ACTION: REFERENCE: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 23-78; ZONE CHANGE, ZC 26-78; CONDITIONAL USE, CU 33-78; SUBDIVISION, S 11-79 SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: The applicant is proposing to construct eleven (.11) buildings in an approved' M-4 "Industrial Park" Zone under a Planned Development District designation, Conditional Uses are allowed as evidenced in application's.narratiye Section IV, Page 40. This application fulfills Condition #5 of Zone Change, ZC 26-78 a Site Design Review -Condition#9 of Zone Change, ZC 26-78 has been satisfied. 4i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Site Design Review application with the following conditions: 1. Traffic signal installation agreement be approved by all parties. 2. Sublease - Greenway Floodplain agreementbe approved by all parties. 3. Applicant to apply for Zoning Ordinance Amendment if additional uses are desired in the future which have not been granted to date on this project. '' 4. Plan to be approved by Washington County District Number One Fire Marshall. Letter of approval to be made as part of this record. , STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' SDR 8-80 (Kell Bus. Center) Apri1. 4, 1980 k' Page .2 • g. No occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been. carried out by the appropriate department. 7, No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this project unless fr1 application is made to the City of Tigard Planning Depart- ment and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 8. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless .formal application is made to the appropriate City department and changes-are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings. . i 9. Grading plans and construction plans an all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 10. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed-to this Site prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. ll. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 12„ No Building Permit shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty day appeal period from the date of approval. • 13. Improvements may be bonded prior to. issuance of Building Permits. • 14. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a Building Permit. • • Prepared b, �- �- arming Director Ally= STAFF NOTE: A personal note of appreciation to Salina Durdell of Koll and Rick Saito of McKenzie - Thanks for being so co-operative. If I can help you in any way - just ask. • • • • ATTACHMENT * STAFF REPORT SDR 8-80 (Koil Business Center) April 4, 1980 NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. . _ 4. /4, aa Signature(ACo ct Person) Date Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder, within twenty (20) days of tlie Planning Director's action. • 'YZ STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 15, 1980 Tigard City Hall 12420 SW Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 6-80 (Natkin & Co. Office/Warehouse) APPLICANT: Roy A. Eldridge OWNER: SAME NATKIN & COMPANY • 14830 SW 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: Site Plan and Design Review for Natkin and Company office/warehouse buildings. LOCATION: 14830 SW 72nd (Wash. Co. 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 1902) SITE DESIGNATION: M-3 "Light Industrial" PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space for each 1,000 square foot of gross floor area: Number Required = 25 Number Proposed = 50 PREVIOUS ACTION: Applicant's previous request for Site Plan and Design Review in regards to a parking lot serving the on-site facilities was approved subject to conditions June 12, 1979 (SDR 20-79) . Applicant applied for a side yard setback requirement of twenty (20) feet to ten (10) feet and was approved by the Planning Commission on April 15, 1980 (V 3-80) . SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: 1. The site is zoned M-3 and designated "Light Industrial" on the NPO #5 Plan. 2. Applicant is proposing to develop the site in phases; Phase I including construction of a pipe fab./sheet metal shop and Phase II involving an office building. 3. Portions of the site fall within the designated one-hundred-year floodplain. (It is noted that the applicant failed to obtain a Grading and/or Special Use Permit (Sensitive Lands Permit) to cut and fill in the one-hundred-year floodplain.) Revised Site Grading Plans should be submitted/approved by Public Works Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. • 1'; STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW/SDR 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT v May 15, 1980 Page 2 4. Building and parking shown as conceptual only in Phase II, the exact shape and configuration to be submitted at a later stage. 5. It is anticipated that a Local Improvement District (L.I.D.) will be formed for the improvement of 72nd Avenue. Applicant has been conditioned to sign the L.I.D. Petition (Reference Variance, V 3-80) . . STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions. 1. A signed acknowledgement of conditions placed upon applicant in reference to Variance, V 3-80 be filed with the City. 2. A signed 'Local Improvement District Petition be filed with the City relative to 72nd Avenue improvements. 3. Detailed Grading Plans be submitted to the Public Works Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. 1 4. A meets and bounds legal description be prepared for all lands within ' the one-hundred-year floodplain. This land to be dedicated to the City as Open Space/Greenway. Dedication to be made prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 5. Phase II shall be submitted for Site Design Review prior to the issuance of Building Permits for work in Phase II. 6. Erosion control planting program be carried out on the steep earth banks along floodplain. This work shall be inspected and approved by the Public Works Director. Planting to be in place prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 7. Applicant to submit Sign Permit Application for all signs on their property. 8. All conditions placed on the approval of Variance, V 3-80 shall be satisfied. ,.'.;,< we •, Planning Director NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of Building Permits or engineering approval. Signature Date