Planning Commission Packet - 09/18/1979 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
AGENDA
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION C'
September. 18, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
>' Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room
10865 S.W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon
1. Open Meeting:
2. Roll Call:
0
3. Approval. of Minutes from Previous Meeting(s) :
4. Planning Commission Communication :
5. Public Hearings :
A. Staff Report
B. Applicant's Presentation
C. Public Testimony
1. Proponent's
2. Opponent's
3. Cross-Examination
D. Staff Recommendations
E. Commission Discussion & Action
i
5. 1 CONDITIONAL USE CU 'k-79 (Tarbell Realtors Building) NPO #6
A request by Thomas and Greiner/Architects for a conditional use permit
to construct and operate a Professional Office Building in a C-3 "General
Commercial" zone on a 1.47 acre parcel located at the Northeast corner of
Shady Lane and S.W. Greenburg Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1-35B, Tax Lot 205) .
5.2 SUBDIVISIONS 6-79 (Golf Creek Estates) NPO #6
A request by Mr. Michael D. Elton to appeal the decision by the Planning
Director on July 17, 1979 for denial of his subdivision request on a
2 .83 acre parcel located at the Southwest corner of S. W. 108th and
S.W. Durham Road (Wash. Co. Tax nap 2S1 15A, Tax Lot 1500) .
5. 3 TEMPORARY USE TU 12-79 (Summerfield, Roderick Enterprises) NPO #6
A request by Mr. Ronald K. Knutson for a six month temporary use permit
to locate two security guard trailers in a C--4PD "Retail Commercial"
zone , located at 11205 S.W. Summerfield Drive (Wash. Co. Tax Map, 2S1. 10D,
Tax Lot 1902) .
6. Old Business :
7. New Business :
8. Other Business: Study Session. Please see attached.
9. Adjournment:
ATTACHMENT \ \
41' STUDY SE � . ^ (
STUSSION ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED.
1. Subdivision Ordinance Amendment
\ : 2. Annexation with C ty Zoning . \
3. Zone all lots in the City to the Comprehensive Plan <\
\ \
. � 4. Residential-Commerical Zone (C-4) Amendment. (See attached 18.32)
� r
5. Other
( \
� \
\ \
}
� \
E
, \
� \
. \
� \
� \
§ \
\
< \
\
�� \
\
\
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room
10865 S.W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon
President Tepedino OPENED the meeting at 7:35 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Funk, Helmer, Herron, Kolleas, Speaker, Tepedino
Absent: Bonn, Smith
Commission Vacancies: One y
Staff: Howard, Selby
The MINUTES of the August 21 meeting, which had been ordered to be redone,
were considered. Speaker MOVED approval as now submitted. The motion was
seconded and carried.
The MINUTES of the September 4 meeting were likewise considered. Speaker
MOVED approval, which motion was seconded and carried.
The President reported a COMMUNICATION from Puget Diecasting and Injection
Moulding dated September 13, which was discussed further after the public •
hearings.
The President opened the PUBLIC HEARINGS portion of the meeting by reading
the usual notice of authority for and procedure of the meeting. He stated
the order of hearing the agenda items would be 5.1, 5.3, then 5.2, at the
request of Staff.
5.1 CONDITIONAL USE CU 20-79 (Tarbell) NPO #6
A request by Thomas and Greiner/Architects for a Conditional Use Permit
to construct and operate a Professional Office Building in a C-3 "General
Commercial" zone on a 1.47 acre parcel located at the Northeast corner of
Shady Lane and S.W. Greenburg Road (Washington County Tax Map 1S1-35B,
•
Tax Lot 205) .
Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS.
John Greiner, architect of Bellevue, Washington, presented the APPLICANT'S
PRESENTATION. He discussed each of the Staff Recommendations. He explained
the Tarbell Company would use the building as its Northwest Headquarters, but
until it needed all the space, the upper floors would be rented for offices.
Selby explained the revised plan presented to the Commissioners at the
start of the meeting, which shows the building relocated slightly in relation
to the large oak tree on the property.
There was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Funk questioned whether the property
was in the floodplain. Staff reported it was not Since no Commissioners
had other questions, Speaker MOVED approval of Conditional Use Cu 20-79 based
on Staff Findings and Recommendations. The motion was seconded by Helmer
and carried unanimously.
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979
Page 2
5.3 TEMPORARY USE TU 12-79 (Summerfield, Roderick Enterprises)
A request by Mr. Ronald K. Knutson for a six month, Temporary Use Permit
•
to locate two security guard trailers in a C-4PD "Retail. Commercial"
zone, located at 11205 S.W. Summerfield Drive (Washington County Tax
Map, 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 1902) .
Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS, adding as Staff
Recommendation 3, "That only two security guard trailers be allowed." He
stated he had counted six trailers, on the property.
There was no one present to make the APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION, nor was
there any PUBLIC TESTIMONY,
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION; Speaker asked clarification of the
security 'guard designation, the date from which the six months approval
would run (September 18) , and whether there would be separate trailers for •
construction offices. Howard felt the two authorized should be adequate,
and stated he would follow up on the matter.
Speaker MOVED approval of Temporary Use TU 12-,79 based on Staff Findings
and Recommendations, including Recommended Condition 3 limiting authorized
trailers to two. Helmer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously,
5.2 SUBDIVISION S 6-79 APPEAL (Golf Creek Estates)
A request by Mr. Michael D. Elton to appeal the decision by the Planning
Directory on July 17, 1979 for denial of his subdivision request on a
2.83 acre parcel located at the Southwest corner of S.W. 108th and S.W.
Durham Road (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 15A, Tax Lot 1500) ,
Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS, being the report prepared
by Staff as the basis of the denial by the Planning Director of a request for
a regular subdivision of a 2.83 acre parcel for single family residences.
Tonight's hearing is on the applicant's appeal from that decision of the
Planning Director.
Joe Walsh of Waker Associates, Inc. , made the APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION.
He related past Commission denials of two higher density development proposals
for the site as the reason for coming in with this single family proposal.
He discussed their proposed handling of the drainage swale open space. He
felt even if the City were to own the swale, the property owners would
probably provide better care of it than the City because of limited City
budgets.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY was offered by Mrs. Grant Chamberlain of S.W. 108th
Avenue, and Mrs. Narisa Brewer, an adjoining landowner. Both spoke in favor
of the single family style of development for the property (in effect opposing
the denial of the proposed subdivision) .
f.
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979
Page 3
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Selby discussed this application
for a standard subdivision in relation to Code provisions calling for abutting
of each lot onto a public street. He pointed out the private drive planned
for the east portion, and the "temporary" 25-foot right-of-way proposed on
the west, characterizing them as violations of the City Code for standard
' subdivisions. He explained the concerns of the City with respect to the
drainageway, outlining methods by which it might be handled. He doubted
Sewer to the area would be available very soon. Tepedino inquired the type
of Staff work with the developer which has taken place. Selby explained the
conflicting views of the NPO (favoring higher development along Durham
Road) versus the neighbors, who have appeared in force at the two previous
Planning Commission hearings for higher densities on the property, favoring
single family development.
Funk questioned if there had been any suggestion to the developer to
come in as a PD. Selby pointed to the Staff statement that the fee for a
request for a Planned Development will be waived. Speaker asked when sewer
would be available. Howard explained difficulties occasioned by new develop-
ments which utilize the capacity of the high-pressure system in the Summer-
field area, thereby forcing reliance for sewer to this development on the
USA intercepter. He guessed it would take a year to get the service to this
area. He forecast the nature of development along Durham Road when sewer
�.* does arrive, and expressed very strong doubts that the property would be
developed single family in the light of the higher densities already approved.
He explained that Durham Road is still under jurisdiction of the County and
has decreed it is a limited access road, and that there is no circulation
plan for the area south of Durham Road. The NPO approves R-5 zoning,
whereas previously the neighbors have been very vocal in favoring only single
family development. The site is unique because of the drainageway bisecting
it. In all, many things have affected permissible land use on it, and the
arrival of sewer will bring many more, possibly drastic, changes. He explained
his strong aversion to committing the direction of development of surrounding
property by allowing the half-street dedication and temporary use thereof,
with the expectation that future development will take place in such a manner
that this is an appropriate part of the eventual transportation plan. He
felt these uncertainties were too great to take at this time , since he looks
for development of the whole area within five years. While the developer
has come in with a revised plan calculated to remove some of the Code viola-
tions pointed out by Staff, it did not arrive in time for Staff properly to
evaluate it for this meeting.
The President felt we must act on what is submitted to us, and it was
generally agreed it was not the Commission's part to redesign the project
to make it meet the Code.
The President recognized Joe Walsh, who explained features of the new
plan. He felt sewer would be available by next June if USA keeps on schedule.
His desire is to have everything ready by the time sewer is available. He
felt development at R-5 density would not permit appreciably more units than
are shown in this request because of the topography.
mow
}
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979
M. Page 4
Tepedino deplored the number of appearances already made on this property,
but favored additional working with the Staff to the end of possibly bringing
in a PD proposal. Staff indicated willingness :to work further with the
applicant, expressing confidence in their ability to work out a satisfactory
solution.
The President recognized Michael Elton, the owner, in view of the
peculiar characteristics of the site and its history before the Commission.
He stated 5,000 square foot lots would almost certainly result in rental
properties. He felt larger lots tended to promote larger interest by owners
in good maintenance of the grounds (in this case, the creek) .
At the request of the President, Selby summarized the legal difficulties
in the plan proposed originally. Howard asked the Commission allow him to
work with the applicant further. Selby explained the form of motion necessary
to fulfill the apparent intent of the Commission based on the discussion.
Tepedino thereupon MOVED for continuation of the Planning Director's
denial of Subdivision 6-79 based on Staff Findings and the information
generated in the hearing, with these special conditions: that there be
a waiver of fees and costs to the applicant for his next request on this
PP q
parcel; that the applicant and the Staff work together to resolve the
discrepancies with the Code; and that the item be reset for the earliest
possible rehearing before the Commission. The motion was seconded by Kolleas
and carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS:
---Selby brought to the Commission a petition signed by all the
residents of S.W. King Raysyth Court, who ask their street be renamed Ponderosa
Place. Speaker MOVED recommendation by the Planning Commission to the City
Council of the change of the street name as requested. Helmer seconded the
motion, which passed unanimously.
---Tepedino brought up the subject of time limits on various approvals --
a sort of statute of limitations. After considerable discussion it was
generally agreed Staff should consider inserting as a more or less standard
condition that the authority granted must be exercised with a certain time
frame. Staff agreed to give some thought to the problem.
---Howard brought up the letter directed to the President from Puget
Diecasting and Injection Moulding regarding an old (1973) floodplain fill
permit. He related the history and present status of the property involved.
The feeling was that a public hearing on the matter was in order. After
considerable discussion Tepedino MOVED the Planning Staff request the applicant
to appear at a full public hearing on his allegations concerning the filling
of the floodplain. Kolleas seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
1
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i ;i
i .
su September 18, 1979 I.
Page 5
4
---Howard reported the Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been submitted to
MSD. Some minor changes were suggested, but LCDC requires an urban planning
agreement between all cities and their respective counties. Washington
County appears to be in no hurry to comply with this requirement. Howard (;"
explained the problems with this, some of the ramifications, and the present
status.
---Howard described the redraft of the Land Partition. Ordinance which
he characterized as a reorganization of previous material with no substantive
changes. Tepedino suggested we take it home for study and action at a ! `
subsequent meeting.
Howard presented an .amendment to Chapter 18.32, Selby explained the , '
changes, characterizing them as minor, and principally housekeeping. It i .
is intended to make the ordinance comply with. the NPO #4 Plan. In discussion '
Funk expressed considerable dissatisfaction with the situation, around Gaarde IP.
Street and Pacific Highway, although he recognized his quarrel was really
with the NPQ plan rather than the ordinance. Helmer MOVED approval by the
I Planning Commission of the amendments to Chapter 18.32 as submitted. Tepedino
seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
The President adjourned the meeting at 9:20.
S<
ii';
i.;
r :.
i
( i
(1
PUBLIC NOTICE
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room
10865 S.W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon
1r5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 CONDITIONAL USE CU 18-79 (Tarbell Realtors building) NPO #6
A request by Thomas and Greiner/Architects for a conditional use permit
to construct and operate a Professionsl Office Building in a C-3 "General
Commercial" zone on a 1.47 acre parcel located at the Northeast corner of
Shady Lane and S.W. Greenburg Road (Washington County Tax Map 131-35B,
Tax Lot 205) .
5.2. SUBDIVISIONS 6-79 (Golf Creek Estates) NPO #6
A request by Mr. Michael D. Elton to appeal the decision by the Planning
Director on July 17, 1979 for denial of his subdivision request on a
2.83 acre parcel located at the Southwest corner of S.W. 108th and
S.W. Durham Road (Washington County Tax Map 251 15A, Tax Lot 1500) .
5.3 TEMPORARY USE TU 12-79 (Summerfield, Roderick Enterprises) NPO #6
A request by Mr. Ronald K. Knutson for a six month temporary use permit
to locate two security guard trailers in a C-4PD "Retail Commercial"
zone , located at 11205 S.W. Summerfield Drive (Washington County Tax
Map, 251 10D, Tax Lot 1902) .
Publish TT 9/5/79 & 9/12/79
F
C
r
•
"PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET10
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME ON THE
APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEETS , LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS
DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON
INDICATED ITEM(S) .
AGENDA ITEM: 3- • / REFERENCE: DATE:
NAME ADDRESS
p..°. i3.,e ti L 7 t i e i I e.1 t4 c T 0 7
AA4ct 01,4-(yo
y'.
AGENDA ITEM: 51 Z-- REFERENCE: S DATE:
NAME ADDRESS
it'a.vvti
AGENDA ITEM: S ?j REFERENCE: _ ___-� fi '. DATE:
NAME ADDRESS
WU-L!4M mctamAtz,A .113,71 Svc! L4KEwocD C7. Ti4.1-121Jj o2 '
r w
STAFF REPORT f '
Ilir' AGENDA 5.1
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979 - 7:30 P.M. ;
Fowler Junior High - Lecture Rm.
10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Ore.
Docket: Conditional Use 20-79 (Tarbell Realtors Re: CU 33-77 and CU 15-79)
Applicant: Prendergast Moore % Thomas & Greiner Owner: Prendergast Moore Co.
P.O. Box 1927 for D.M. Tarbell
Bellevue, Washington 98009 1800 SW 1st, Suite 545
Portland, OR 97201
Application Date: September 5, 1979
Site Location: 300 feet east of Greenburg Road on Shady Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map
1S1 35B, Tax Lot 205).
Request: For a conditional use permit to construct and operate a professional office
building in a C-3 "General Commercial" zone on a 1.47 acre parcel.
Previous Action: On August 21, 1979, the Planning Commission approved an extension
of the conditional use for the extended height of the building.
I. Findings of Fact: 1i
L
1. The site is designated"Retail Commercial" on the Neighborhood Planning
Organization #2 Plan and zoned C-3, "General Commercial."
F
2. Section 18.28.020(30), of the Tigard Municipal Code allows professional i
office buildings as a conditional use in the C-3 zone. 1
E;
3. The site is a vacant, triangular-shaped parcel which is situated several f.
feet below the grade of SW Shady Lane. A large Oak tree is located I
approximately west of center on the lot. Surrounding land uses are Highway
217 to the north, vacant land to the southeast, across Shady Lane and to
the south an insurance office and a retail store (under construction); to
the west is a service station. s.
4. The applicant is proposing to construct a three-story, 32,090 square foot
real estate office building with other professional office uses on the north
side of Shady Lane.
i
5. SW Shady Lane is designated a local street on the NPO #2 Plan. There k4,
is presently sufficient right-of-way to meet the local street standards i' .
of 50 feet. However, Shady Lane is in substandard condition (no curbs,
sidewalks or street lights). H
P:
6. Sanitary sewer and water services are available to the site via existing
lines in SW Shady Lane. I
:w
t'
o
a
,5
1
ti
STAFF REPORT
ir AGENDA 5.1
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
CU 20-79
Page 2
II. Conclusionary Findings:
1. Professional office operation is similar to the permitted real estate
office use.
2. The proposed use is in keeping with the intent of the commercial zone.
III. Staff Recommendation: `
Based on findings of fact and conclusionary findings, staff recommends
approval subject to the following condition:
1. A half street improvement to local street standards be made on the SW
Shady Lane frontage. No building permits will be issued until construction
drawings have been submitted to the Public Works Department and the
necessary bonds filed. -'
2. The large oak tree on site is to remain and be protected during construction j
to insure survival. `''
3. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal
application is made to the appropriate department and changes are approved
by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and
shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other
details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in
these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation i,;
from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work I4,
order on the project or any portion of the project. i
4. That the applicant receive site design review approval prior to issuance of
building permits.
c:
k•'
I.'
,
r
4'
i
Written by: Ken a by Reviewed by: `oward
Associate Tanner Pla director t
1
i
.
12- SE 0-M,M(5 5444- /T1 . tt 5. z
'STAFF REPORT
f x'IGAFtD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI`I"Y• WILL., 12420 S.W. Main St
July 3.7, 1979 . •
•
i
DOCKET: Subdivision 6-79 (Golf. Creek Estates)
REQUEST: To subdivide a 2.83 acre parcel into eleven lots
SITE LOCATION: Southwest corner of S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 108th Street "
APPLICANT: Michael D. Elton
500 N.E. Multnomah
Suite 380
Portland, Oregon 97232
SITE DESIGNATION: R-7 Single Family Residential
PREVIOUS ACTION;
The Tigard Planning Commission on September 5, 1978 approved the applicant's
request for a zone map amendment for a tract of land, depicted on Wash. Co_
Tax Map 2S1 15A as Tax Lot 1500, from Wash. Co. "RS-1" to City of Tigard
•
"R-7" Single Family Residential (Ref: ZC 16-78) .
The Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of March 6, 1979
denied the applicant's request for a conditional use permit in regards
constructing duplex units on the subject site.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
The site is designated as "Urban Low Density" on the NPO #6 Plan and zoned
R-7 "Single Family Residential".
The applicant proposes to subdivide and construct eleven (11) single family
units with the smallest lot size being 7,500 sq ft and the largest 15,000 q.
ft.
The site is split by a Creek which flows north to south through the area.
A major portion of the property is in the natural drainage way.
Y•
Water lines are adjacent to the site and the Summerfield Trunk Sewer line is
being designed to pass through the site in the creek area.
S.W. Durham Road is designated as a, residential arterial road in the NPO #6
Plan With the nocossary right-of-way of 90 ft. S 1.03th i:; dt2si.g;lab.td a
local street.
CONC1,rJSIONAaY FINDINGS:
The applicant's request for a zone change, to City of Tigard R-7 Single Family
Residential, was approved by the City Council October. 23, 1978 subject to con-
ditions as enumerated.
kw
A
. .
. STAFF REPORT
•
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
July 17, 1979 '
Page 2 .
•
A major portion of the subject site falls within a natural .drainage system
from the Pond across Durham Road in Summerfield. No buildings can be
placed on this portion of the property. •
Access from the western portion of this site on to Durham Road is contrary
to Washington County Policy to limit access to Durham.
Site has been designated for higher density development. recently by the
Tigard City Council on. May 21, 1979. , .
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: •
Staff recommends denial of this proposal for the following reasons;
1. Access/ingress to western portion of property is not appropriate„
Durham Road' shall remain a' "Limited access road".
2. Spanning of this natural drainage way is not appropriate to serve the '
western portion of the property.
3. Area is now designated for apartment units. Single Family Residences
are now not appropriate.
•
GENERAL STAFF COMMENTS:
Ironically Mr. Elton's original proposal for a Senior Citizens Retirement
Complex may now be possible for this site. If the applicant wished to
reapply for a planned development retirement center, staff would process
same.
In consideration of the number of times Mr. Elton has applied for applica-
tion to this site. The fee for the planned development will be waived.
Report prepared by: Ken y Report review by: Al di r-�.Jard 1,
Assoc -ate City Planner
P1aF n nr Director
i
( .-. a. eP f,ii.. iy pa4 he. AJ dacs o'i r ,L,...,( x611.( p t.-.-t.4)
•
:sue
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning - Ken Selby
FROM: Public Works - Frank Currie
SUBJECT: Review of Preliminary Pla of Golf Creek Estates
DATE: September 12, 1979
Because I was not available for the preliminary development meeting concerning this
proposed development, I have made a field trip with John Hagman and discussed with
you some of these concerns.
We looked specifically at sanitary sewer requirements, access onto existing public
rights-of-way, requirements for improvements to existing adjacent facilities, storm
drainage requirements, and pedestrian concerns.
As a matter of prime concern should be the fact that this proposed development does
not have access to sanitary sewer facilities. As a matter of practicality, this
proposed development should not be allowed to start until a construction contract
has been let and a foreseeable completion date is available for sewer service to
this development.
The nearest feasible sewer line location is the, as yet, uncompleted U.S.A. Upper-
Tualatin River Interceptor. This property will eventually be served by the one-
s( half mile long Tualatin Development Compaiy "Summerfield" trunkline which will
connect U.S.A.'s Interceptor with Summerfield Subdivision (by gravity flow).
You had mentioned some concern about increased traffic exiting from the proposed
subdivision onto SW 108th Avenue as contributing to a possible safety problem at
the Durham Road intersection with SW 108th Avenue due to the undulating condition
of Durham Road.
An investigation shows sight distances to the east are in excess of 1000 feet with
no undulations and in excess of 600 feet to the west with one undulation, the bottom
of which is 150 feet west of the intersection.
While a driver in the bottom of one of these undulations may have a problem with sight
distance, the driver. entering Durham Road who is required to stop has good visibility
in both directions.
The minimum desirable stopping sight distance, as recommended by the Transportation
Research Institute to the Oregon Traffic Safety Commission, for 45 mph design
speed is three-hundred seventy five (375) feet.
The same site distance situation occurs at the proposed private road at the west
end of the proposed development, except that visibility is almost unrestricted.
Access at this point, likewise, is no problem.
I do think this proposed private road should be public in view of the future
development which will occur south and west of this proposed development and will,
k. because of topography, exit onto Durham Road.
r
e
A
rPage 2
4
Topography is such that half street improvements should be required at this time on
SW 108th Avenue as a condition of approval.
Future, full street improvements on Durham Road will preclude total half street
improvements at this time. I think we need a consent covenant guaranteeing non-
remonstrance and partial street improvements, as they relate to pedestrian traffic
on Durham Road (ie., a paved pedestrian trail and a temporary crosswalk at either
SW 108th Avenue or the road at the west end) and as they relate to each of the two
street intersections on Durham Road (ie., curb returns).
Profiles of existing ground at curb line and trail locations should be required
along the south side of Durham Road.
Appropriate easements for sewer, storm drainage and roadways should be provided.
Streetlighting within the development and at both intersections should be provided.
Half street improvements on SW 108th Avenue and improvements on the proposed
roadway at the west end of the development will necessitate some storm drainage
installation which, if not carried west from SW 108th and east from the indicated
'private road, would require off-site construction and commitment to off-site
construction; therefore, storm drainage should be provided onsite, west from
108th and east from the 'private' road to the ravine in such a manner as not to
contribute to existing erosion in the creek bed.
j
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5. 3
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 1979 - 7:30 PM
Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET: : Temporary Use TU 12-79
Applicant: Roderick Enterprises, Inc. Owner: Same
Attn: Mr. Ronald L. Knutson
9370 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 203
Portland, Oregon 97223
Application Date: August 7, 1979
Site Location: 11205 SW Summerfield Drive (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 1902) .
Request: For a six month temporary use permit to locate two security guard
trailers in a C-4PD "Retail Commercial" zone.
Previous Action: The City Administrator approved a 60 day temporary use for the
trailers commencing on August 10, 1979 and terminating on October
9, 1979.
I. Findings of Fact:
1. The subject site is zoned C-4PD "Neighborhood Commercial" and is designated
IIIthe same on the NPO #6 Plan.
2. The purpose of the request is to permit the use of trailers as temporary
guard office facilities.
3. Section 18.80.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code authorizes the Planning
Commission the right to grant temporary permits to terminate within six
months from the date of issuance.
II. Conclusionary Findings:
1. The location of the facility is well within the commercial center area and
will not affect the eastern adjacent residence of Summerfield.
III. Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions:
1. That the applicant receive approval by the Building Department and Fire
Marshall for installation and occupancy of the trailers.
2. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal
application is made to the appropriate department and changes are approved
by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and
shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other
details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in
these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation
from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work I
order on the project or any portion of the project.
/
Written by: Ken y, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Aldie Ho) , Planning
Director