Planning Commission Packet - 05/02/1978 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
-�,-� , �_
� `
� .AC't�N]�.A
�I:(��A.R:t� �3'.�AS��:�:�i�! �.;���"����.�;�
� 1.:A831 .i',, P�rM� ^-� �(o�'�,6 :�".�°i. � � ..
�p��v�.��° k�lax�s�.��:° f'�����i :a���d��;J� �- ��c�c� r;�.��� ��c�;,c��
,., ��J��� �"� ��:�.���; x� .n, ��'��v��a�,� �,��r�c?�7�
� � �;�.�,� �a� �J���.��t�°
�E �.��.�. ���,.�,U
� •. ��.�����;�,. ��:' �i,;�����;�,��
�,� �a���i�����.�;�,���w y
��_ �'�a�:�,�.c� ���-���?s..ir��,���
.�-� �����'�;' �;����s�,�r���;
., ,
�:�:. ..����:�.a�,��� :G.ti,� ���,�s�c����rs����a�
4," �1Q��.�l.t�' `.�'�".�"14:k_k�tK'9����'
,,� ;{'
r�•� �'fL''�L`1'�tl'�kT��'��1� ���
�. �,�,��'S«'JIc7l�''ft`111:;��;�
tti-, �k��i�'��t��,..�n���9�7�71�1`a`1 ifJ�
�_ �`���,�'�N ���;ir.ary��L��'?�;�'�i�;��11`�
�._ .�.r . �4.�1T�dT'f..J�,;:.�`�o,°i 1�:(X,�'1l �.D�.i`a�°4Nll.il�i�1.'�U� �1��. ��1�`�.�.U:f,�
�%r 1 ��� .�''. @s�:��r� °��'° ����� ��t��:"w��tn'hRRQ�v,�i ���3 �
�} ���u��� `��� ����.���. ��r«.�t.��r� � c�v� �� ��c�»�� ��� ��nn��dx��xa'� ��°om R-7
�������.� �'����.� �`c��:����r��;�,��'!G�� �� �;;:� �"�'c��a�.�kri����. ����:f'����.�n��.� ��>�
� 3n�3� ��:�� ��..-�kM �» y��rw, ,,.�pi�;t�;;��,���r��;i.����� ��' �,� '�'�.��+�� �� �►nci `��aad �A���
�W�,k��. �yd- �'�� ����.� �'�`�1 �� ��,, '�`'-��� Y„«��� f����..
�n � L�.7�� �I�,rk���',��.; ;�� 1!�',__"r�a�, E.����`�1„�zf�;:i4������ ;9.��'0 � ''
� �'�':qu�;�� 1�� Y�..c� ��° ,�;���; �, `
� �����, �:� �°��� � ����� �:�� �����a�:�� �'��om F�m� �
��=���,�d.�"�'f�K31 '�°t��.��"9���` G,.re(�1Y9��?""�I.��. ���!t����4�';�"C���.�.�� `I�tSJ ���1� ��.�'� �L3� '.�;�g�317C'C3. !
nG���xM��. �c�Y��i�^:���:,���.u� :C�xb � � , �'�`'� ��m��� ��i.�t��a� ��U� °��iw �.�a�er�e��i�ax� �� ;
�W' G°,x~���1��x��.� l��r��. ��n� ���k��.4tr �ry����� ('"�'��k��• �"�e '�.'��z �(�p �l�1 �SP� �"��r ',
�,�•�;� ���i(�n 9��:�, �i 4�i� ����i ��c�i�� . '
�: `� �'�7�U:��'�:��,xA� `��:� !��� ��,��'ff� (��:��,�z��� �. ����`���.�;�i���.wl��' ��� �
A ��.�����,���� �a�r ��.x���� ����1����� a�rr��,� ������x���`.�.y� ������°i�.,�.�yr,���,�: �`�r^ �. �a�md�.�.�����. I
��� ���r��.°�n ��y� �������';<<Ly r� }� ��r,�,.t;� :f�.����:������^� ���m���yr �m � ��4 p'N��.�h�= '
t��,z°�:��a�cl ���i��b��,��..�� �.:r�,�roe� ��,;� � � `��� �z�:��� ������. r�°� 1436� ��1 Pa�.L��,�
F��,��t�awr��� ���������r:��°��x°;�r ��ua��.�:��z�<;8 �'���rs��. t���. �'�� �i�,p ��1 1�.A a '�aac ��+� 1'7�l�9��,
�,:.�4 ��3�'�����C�IdA.�a ���:��� k.,°�� `��,?�="i�� h"o���us�,t,`� ��'� � �''
�. I
.A. :e`��,,�s���'� '1��w ���:��� �'��ud�, �'snr�' ,� ���o,����'�,c�1Cx�►�. '��� ���7m:�.°� �'�saC' ar�. e��x���.dt� j
��.,�+�.�.�;j�' ��"�� C�d�" �"��k�'�.�, ��;��1ls�t k�k'�r)t;':': ��.�3 %�t � °� �1��."'� XB��'���.. �t'� `�Skl� �C)�'1'11�:�'' t0.�
,5W���� �-T�ry� ��a� ����w�� �i�'���'iu ��:�a �'�� ��� ��'1 �C►�,� �a�e: �ots '1��� �'� 14Qt�� �
�
. _ _ _ _ _ �
'
,,,. ,... ;;, , ;;. :, .,�. .. , . �� _.. , , , . ..
_. . .,�. , ., _ .1
,.
'�i�Eri1�A
� .°C�G,A.� �',T,�1�8�:���'�:� �'��;�������'';;�x��
���'" �g ���l��
���,,� .� .
�}
:r' ��� Ct�N�:��.��1��,��,�"� �.��;� �;'�� °��«.�i�i l��'.:�.�"����. ��.����`�R�,�' �'� �rC�d� 1�1��'t �
A r��,n����,� �� ?������� Ca���.�'�a�n�:.4� �::� �;�c�a� G��an��°�k� :��� �. ����i;������.� C���
�'ex��.� �c�i�� �..� ,�.��.��w�,�a�����,:'�;� ���u���i.�r��,����a� �'x���c�� r����;a��3.� ��e��a ��
11��5 �� �;���^ai� a'� ���'���a� �c�� `.��� ��� ��`�' �a�fl �"�� ��� 1�0��
. . � . . � � � . � �I
�� �.a���. .V�.l,�ilti��: �E:d�a.3..k,k.9'.IG:��p.7 u � � � � �. � . .
�� � A, ���a�l��� �� ���.��.�� �������;� �,����.u��c��`� �;��' �c� �����,�.�;�. �W �C��k����.�z�
5,��°��� ��������r�a� `�'����P ����t ��'j����� ��'��;,eM����� ' �
"�o .a�.��Y1�l��kk�t���'°
�
�
[!
(
�
,
�
�
�
!
1
�
�
�
i
�
� �
i
�
I
_ i
� . . �� + , � . . . � . . . � .
• MINUTES
, � TIGAI�D P]LANNTNG COMMISSICIN
� I�ay 2, 1978 -
Fowler Junior HigYi School - Lecture Room
10865 SW Walntit St - Tigaxd, Ure�on
' 1, Ca17. to Order•
Meeting was called to order at 7s35 PM
2. Roll Call.:
Present: Tepedino, Popp, Quimby, Wood, Rossman, Brian, Sakata, Caxliss
3. Approval of Minutes:
The minutes of april 18, 1978 were approvec3 with the following corrections:
Page 2, Wood's first comment should read "Single Fami�y � Attached would be
the same as SingLe Family Det�ch�d''`; the last comment prior to Eublic Testimony
should read "one unit per salesm�n an.d do not market houses as investment
groperties";Page 9, third paragraph, Rossman voted yes;
4. Cocy�munications:
Quimby read an article from the Oregonian on a legal opinion requesting
that the availaUility of school facilities be considered prior to approval of
construction of new subdivisions and also wanted a copy o£ this repor�.
5. Public Hearings:
ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-7�3 (Meekoms) NPO 2
A request by Daniel Meekoms for a zone tnap amendment from R-7 "Single Facnily
Residential" to CP "Commercial Professional" for a 1.80 acre site at the
intersection of SW Varns St, and 72nd Ave. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1D, Tax
. Lot 800).
A. �taff Report: Read by Altman
B. Applicant's Presentaion:
Dan Meekoms, 13525 St� 131st, �eaverton, stated Y:e had discusse� with the
State Highway Department to verify i£ his proposal would conflict with
their future plan for interchanges o££ 217; they said his proposal
would comply witt�heir plans; he stated the great need for o,ffzces in
the Tigard area; also that his design would be compatible with the
area�saving as many t�ees as possible.
C. Public Testimony;
Opposition:
� Craig Hopkins, :7.43Q SW Varn.sj expressed concern with khe safety of
chiJ.dren attending Phi1 Lewis School w�.�h t'he congestied ��affi� on
72nd be3.ng already bacl; commercial deveYopimen.t would jeopax�i.ze thei,r
�
--� , , - - — �-----
_ MINUTES i
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
.� May 2, �978
, Page 2
safety fuzther.
Mrs. William Swannee, 7325 SW Varns St. , was concerned with the
children as we11 as the trees and was oppaserl to creation of a
"concrete jungle"; she stated the office complex on the ot-her side
of ihe fr.eeway had stood vacarit far 1 1/2 years and she'd like
- �to see the area kept residential.
Jahn Bishop, 7375 SW Varns, expressed concern with the interchange
and wished to see the states decision prior to any action being taken.
D. Staff Recommendation;
Based upon the preceeding findings of fact and conclusions staff
recommends approval subject to the following conditions:
1. That the property not be devel�ped until S.W. Varns St. has been
brought up to City Staizdards. It is recommended that this be done
by means of a local improvement district, with the applicant,�.�.
znitiating the request.
2. Five feet of addition�l right-of-way be provided along the SW
{k 72nd Avenue frontage.
3. File with the City Recorder an agreement to not remonstrate a�ainst
a future Loca]_ Improv�ment Aistrict (LIU) for street improvements'
to SW 72nd Avenue and SW Varns Street. j
1
�
E. Commission Discussion: t
s
�
°Popp was concerned with the additional traf£ic and the development f
of the interchange in the future feeling it Taould serve lots of traffic
currently on Hunziker; he felt truck traff.ic should be broiaght off 217
in the vicinity c�f the Railroad Tracks;, he was concerned with thes
�rowth and control of traffic and Taith bringing the zoning into com-
pliance with the Compreherisi.ve Plan which this pxoposal would do r
and also stated the office supply was i� sh�rt demand in Tigard, �I',
�;
°Quimby asked if this was the area ot extreme air quality problems �
according to DEQ? {
°Staff stated the DEQ report said that in �.985 this area would reach the
mdximur.i limits for air pollution standards.
°Popp said the sma11 traffic generated with thi�, smal.l type of office �
oomplex woul.d generate far Less air pollution; even though it was "
currently zoned R-7 he doubted whethpr anyone would build homes on. �
t17e lot; thxs pXOposal was the best overall development o£ that ,
property. �
., °Wood asked why Varns Sti must be brought up to city standards ar�d 3f �
they were able to atta:ch a cond�.tion on the development not specified ''
by rhe zone in the Compsehensive P1ar.; a].so stated the �rees wouXd be i
answexad in Design Review and pzeserved; th3s axea was zoned iox �
i
, �
� � � � �� � � � � �
}
�
� _ .
�
1�fINUTES
� TTGARD PLANNING COMIIISSION
May 2, 1978
Page 3
development and they couldn't deny his application�,
°Tepedino asked staff about incremental increases of traffic
ac�dressed�.
°Brian st�ted that he felt if the plot was develop�d as R-7 into
Single Family Residences pro�ably more traffic would be. gener.ated
than by this Commercial Professional Development.
°Rossman wanted Popp to clarify his position
°Popp stated he was in favor
°Brian wanted some sort of control factor over the traffic and
made a motion for approval based on staff findings a�nd staff
recommeridations and added ''for the southern ??�' of the lot" a£ter ��2.
°wooa Se�o�a�a
The vote was unanimous for approval.
ZONE CHANGE ZC 10-78 NPO
A request by Roger Belanich tor a zone map atnendment from County B-4
"General Eactensive Commercial" to City C�3 "General Comm�rcial" for paresls
totaling 1.23 acres at the intersection of SW Greenburg Rd arid Shady Lan:e
('i�ash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35�, Tax Lots 1300, 1303, 1400 ancl 1500).
A. Staff Report: Read by Altman
' B. Applicant's Presentation:
Roger Belanich, 2330: 43rd Ave. E. , Seattle, stated he had owned the
�roperty for 6 years and a Shady Latle Study had been made to analyze
the best use for that area; the Comprehensive Plan was then adopted and
the area zoned Retail/Commer.cial. ��
Sakata asked for an exact location, next ta the Tinker Toy Store?
,'
13elani,ch answered it was between the bakery and Tinker Toy Store and had
a 24' frontage.
C. Public Testimonys None
D. Staff. Recommendation: �
`�
Basecl on the preceedin� findings of fact and conclusions, staff recommends
approval subject to the following conditions: ;
1. Five feet of ra.ght-of�way be provided;.along the Cascqd� Avenue
frontage.
2. The applicant file with the City Recorder an agreement not to re- �
monstzate againsL a Loca1 Tmprovement District (LID) for street '
i.mp�ovements to SW Gascade Avenue a�d the £rontage xoad a].ong the `
� southeastern portion �f �he pxoperty. `�
;
'I
� � � �� � �� ;
i
. . . �......,�._.-��. . . . . .. . � ,� . .
MtNUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
" May 2, 1978
� � Page 4
E. Gommission Discussiona
.°Sakata questioned if the 24° was enough for a driveway
°Staff stated 3Q' right of way and 24' paved was the access
requirement
°Brian asked if this problem should be addressed now
°the applicant thought it was a step ahead of time
°Staff refered to Sec. 18.64.030 of the Tigard Misnicipa:L Code
to state with 1-99 parking spaces the minimum access was
130' wi tll 80% paved
°Brian stated there was another exit
°Brian recommended a�groval �ased on staff findings and recommendations
°Quimby seconded the motion
°the vote was unanimous
5.3 GONDITTONAL IJSE't" CU 9-78 (Ko1ve) NPU 3
A request by Gerald Kolve and llonald Kettleberg to operate a title
insurance company in a C-4 "Neighborhood Commercial" zone on a 6.74 acre
parcel (Canterbury Square) at 14363 SW Pacific Hwy. , (Wash. Co. Tax
Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lot 1700).
'�" A. Staff Report : Read by Altman
B. Applicant's Preseritation:
Gerald Ko1ve, 2210 S.W. Brooklyn Blvd. , Portland, stated he
needed a tenant at this location which would attract short telm
parking, with no high volume, arid chose a Title Compan,y which
also conforms to C-4 zoning as a Conciitional Use and does not +
impose any major impact on the shopping center with less than 2%
of the total area of the shopping eenter.
' C. Public Testimony:None
D. Staff Recommendations: ;;
)
Based on the preceeding Findings of Fact and Conclusions, staff �
recommen�s approval of the applicant's request as submiL'ted. F
E. Commission Discussion: �
°Wood moved for approvaJ, based on staff findings and recommendations
Rossman seconded
The vote for approval was unanimous
;.
5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU i0-78 {Herb Jundt) NPO 3 r;
�
A request by Herb Jundt fo� an outside disp�,ay and sCorage of sales and �
rentaJ. �quipment on a 2.1 acre parcel in a C-4 zone at the corner of
SW Gaarcle and Paci�ic H�vy ( .Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S�. 10A, Tax Lots 1-300 and �,400) '
���
��
� , �
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
� May 2,19%.8
, Page 5
A. Staf.f Report"s Read by Altman
B, Applicant's Presentation:
Herb Jundt,
stated that he had assumed the �equest would be approved and when '
staf£ asked for a list of items to be on display there was a
misunderstanding as to what would actually be displayed.
Under Staff Report Finding of Fact �kI,6, concernirg screening, his
drawing was only an approximate representation of the heighth and
would actually be as high as necessary to screen the equipment; i
the area would not actually be seen from Pacific Hwy and Gaarde
as Gaar.de was screened and was below grade-the site was not visible
froim the northbound lanes of Pacific Hwy�
��II, the applicant fuxther stated co�ncerning Finding of Fact #II he
was not deli:berately trying t� make hi5 storage area vis3ble - the
area was not zoneci for industrial constructiou use; this proposal
woul.d be a complete sports stoze allowing the customex the apportunity
to try out several different types of recreation 'by bei:ng able to rent
equipment - it wc,uld also cater to the do-it-you•rself home repairperson
Staff clarified its position as saying i;he basic intent of th�s report
is to seek dixection from the Planning Commission and nat say whe�trer
he's specifically proposing to do it � only trying to clarify what type I
� of use is permitted.
C. Public Testimon:y:
1
(,ti. Proponent's None I
b, Opponent's
Popp read a letter stating opposiiion to the project due to the increase
in traffic and a general disapproval of this type of business in this area,
Russell Ripley, 15655 SW Old Orchard Place, owner of the Furniture Store '
directly across Pacific Hwy for 20 years opposed, statin.g he had earlier
had to blacktop and landscape the front of his lot at great expense to
make the area look good and in keeping with the otherwise 'nice'area;
he stated it was unfair to have so many restzictinns on one side of the
highway and none on the o�her si�a,
Mrs, Rip�.ey, 15$55 SW Old Orchard Place� cited increased traffic hazard
as another reason for opposition.
Brigitte Potitin:g�on, 10085 SW Inez, though� a 10' high fence would t�e
unsightly to drivers.
c. Rebu�tal
� Jun�t stated he had wanted �o raise the grade w�ere the buil.d3.z�g was
located and w�uld do any�hing n.ecessaxy to scree� �he tistoxage axea�
R.ipley asked ho� they could al.low an��hing that would r�qu�,xe covering up
, i�
. u
. ;i
�i
MINUTES "
TIGARD PLANNING CQMMISSION �'
� May 2, 1978 ;'
Page 6
k+
Bruce Aiiderson, 11205 SW Gaarde, statPd this was not a suitable business
for this location� ��
k'�.
Tepedino asked if the general concept of this �tore had changed since he
had last presented his proposal to the Planning Commission? The previous Pi
time it had been strictly sports shop and light hardware.
' Dv Staff Recommendations:
,
Based upon the preceeding findings of fact and conclusions staff recommend"s
that this request be denied. �.
if the Planning Commission chooses ta approve this request staff recommE�ds, `
the following conditions be applied:
1. Sa1es and rentals be restricted from serving the construction industry
with power equipment.
2. No outside display be �ermitted. '
�,
3. The design criteria specified in the Conclusionary Findi.ngs be utilized •,
�.
for Design Review. �
�
- e Street fronta
e
n he aard
4. xen feet qf right-of way be dedicated alo g t G g
for street improvement psrposes.
�
F'
E. Commission Discussion: �
Popp stated he had nothing against a sports store but the out�ide display area
was inappropriate and all other merchants had to conform to out�ide E'
aesthetics.
Wood stated the previous discussion didn't consider large� construction :
machines - only type of outdoor storage of these machinas could be under:.a ''�
roof� �
Corliss stated Tigard could use these items on a rental �iasis bt�t that this
was an inappropriate use for this area; rental equipment requires outside
storage• '�
i
ti
Quimby felt there was no need for this type of equipment and it was not in `
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan `
1
Sakata stated there was a need for something like this in Tigard� k
!
,� Tepedino thought it was inappropriate in this area with dwelling un�.ts `
adjacent and businesses around; he was under the impLession from the previous ;
discussion that the store would be storing ski equipment outside. �'
�
�
i
Wood felt it was a similar use based on its retail store similarity, �
1
_ _ _ _
p d MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMIS�ION
May 'L, 1978
:,, Pag� 7 -
.Wood made a rnoti�n for denial abased on staff findings and rer.�mmendations,
Quimby seconded the motion.
The motio.n for denial was unanimous.
5.5 �ONDITIONAL USE CU 12-78 (Tigard Assembly of God ) NPO 3
� A request by the Rev. A.M. Hultgren for Tigard Assembly of God church for a
condition al use permit for an internally illuminated free standing sign at
11265 SW Gaarde St (Wash. �Co. Tax Map 2S1 3DC, Tax Lot 100)e
A. Staff Report: Read by Altman
B. Applicant's Presentation: Not present
Sakata made a motion to table the item,
Tepedino secoz�c�ed,
Popp stat�d as there was g gentleman present to present public testimony
the motion should be for denial
The rnotinn for tabling and the second was withdrawn.
Wood made a motion for denial with Quimby seconding
�P'
Popp statPd that hissorical.ly the items are denied if someone shows up to give
public testimony
Tep�dino expressed a desire to hear the item.
Ths motion for denial was withdrawn as well as the second.
Wood stated it was an undue burden on the public to show up and not be allowed to
te s tify �
Popp asked not to proceed with the Public hearing as the ap�lican� failed to i
appear_
- Brian agreed since it was standard policy tn deny they would be consiste�t. ��
�
Wood m�ved for denial and Tepedino seconded ; the �aote for denial was unanimous.
5.1 Request to realign SW Katherine Street by �he Tigard School. District
A. Staff Report : (in the fozm of a memo) Read by Altman
B. Applicant's Presentation;
Bob Greenwood, Administxative Assistant �o Deb Fennel�. a
� s�ated that in 1969 when the Aistr�,ct purch�.sed it, parr of. the agreem�nt
�ias Che dedication of the xoad, to 121st; "L�.e prope��y was nor sold fox a
development a�nd the p�obJ.em due ro Che nature oE Gh� l.and was the roac� !
shou7.d be �ea,].i�;ned anyway - soi.x enga.neering and pea� makeup �ests
�
� . .
s__
_.,-_ , . �___ _
� NiINUT�S
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
May 2 , 1�78
�k. Page 8
ma�e on: the site had indicatPd tl�e roa� would be more
easily and cheaply put in in this new aliqnmen� pro�as�d;
thereby allowina more money to be put i.nto the actual building
than the street. ViSibilzty tests also done had shown this
exit point onto 1.21st has 1000 � of vi.sibility in eith�r
direction which no other point offers.
Bill Risner, 1234. 5 5.W. Katherine St. , i
owner of the property next to the �ntrance of the school was �
concerned with the traffic pattern to be created on K�t.herine i
Street but was not specifically op�osed to the new alignment. �
He stated the curves a.t the end of the street r,aere better .for E
traffic an.d tYie safety of the scho:ol; he wanted to know the ;
width of the entrance street to the schoal. �
�
,
� Altman st�ted the street was to the width required by the TN1C, ;
Risn�r s�tated th� Design R�view �te�or.t stated �the street
to be 25 " with one side sidecvalks .
F.:
rRr. Greenwnod asked how the schoo�. district could c:arry out i<
Condition #3 to remov� the garage structL�re which was not on
�* their property? Was this a condition which could be impos�d "��
�� on the develaper: � � ����
�{:
Staff answered the school district would have to make �t
arrangements with the property own�rs. ;';
-,.
Herr� Booke, 1709 Blankenship Road, West Linn, for Century 21, �'
1
st�ated they would remove the garage if it was a condition
placed and further stated it would have to be removeci anyway.
Tepedino asked for a definition of other access routes ta �he s'`+
school. After being shown �y Mr. Altman, Mr, Tepedint� sta,ted �'
f';
the 25 ' proposed entrance road t� the school trom Katherine
would require much fill which would be in violati�n of the
Tigard Municipal Code ' s statement on f1Qpd plain fi11_; he
felt this current request for a realignment of Katheri.ne St.
,.
was an attem�,�t to mask the actual effects of the street construc^ ,#
tion through the flood plain; the property is a marsh anc� �`
a hydrographi:c analy�is was necessary to preserve the health, '
safety, and welfare o� the kids �t the school.. �'!
��,;
Wood stated the new alic�nment cro�sas th.e ;�lood �1ai,n at the ��
same poi,nt as the old alignment�
t.
Tepeda.no said the olc� one was Qredicated pn px'�,'Va.�e a��eements �
and the violation o£ the �lood plain must nQt be allowed '.;
either �rith �he new or old alignment �
Woad asked i,� the old a�.ic�nment had been. approved`; �
s
A�.tznan s�atec� �,t was a dec��.cated righ�,of�wax and an applica�ion �
;
� _ __ _
�''.
� ,
9 � ,
MI'iJ'iJTES
TIGARD PLANNING COPM�IISSION
'�� MaY 2, 19 7 8
Page 9
tq the Planning Commissian for a Flood Plain Fill Permit would
l�e needed.
[aood stated he agreed with Tepedino; they should �ive
direction to the school and the proposed new route was a
good one; they needed to determine whether to fi11 the fload
plain or nat.
Tepedino stated the issue of f.�ood plain fill should be c3ealt
with first.
�i
Wood stated as they needed a flood plain fi11 permit from the +
P.C. they might as well okay one of the routes nou�.
, � 1
Tepeclino stated the need for hydrological studies first.
Popp stated tri� right-of-way exists �or the current desig-
na�ion either the new or old alignment, and if fill would ;
be neec�ed th�y would definitely need. a permit, but would they
need a permit if they were merely crossing the flood plain?
He continued ta say it would be a separate item to be heard.
He also asked if 25 ' would be adequate aecess to the sahool •
;;;. property. �
Br..�an i.nquired as to the exact steps needed if they were to
approve this request and would they be able to review the
access? Also what constituted fill? �
;
Altman read from the T.�I.C. book defininc� flood plain fill.
Qui.mby asked if th.ey could appeal the Design Review decision
concerning the 25 ' a.ccess road.
Greenwooc� asked where the limi�ts of tlze �lood plain axe?
Wood felt they should agree or di.sagree with the current
proposal for a new alignment of Katherine Street. il
Tepedino disagreed with staf�: stating it was relevant and
essential and critical now �ahere the road goes arid an engineering
desi�n was ne�essary.
Wood made a motion for approval based on staff recoznmendations
#1 and #2 with an additional item tor the ap�roval based only �
on Pl�nning Commission �in3ings that the proposed route is
superior �o the existing route and that the P.C. has not
addrassed the issue ot whethe� the old o� �he new route wi1.l
be appropriate i.n its' crossi.ng of and possible fill o� the
�iooa p,lain and the a�prov�l. ot re�lignznent c�oes not involve
any consideration �� �.he entrance to the site.
Brian seconded the imo�xon. i
;
�
a�
�� : —
=. _.. _. _ ._
,.
�
a �
. � �. . . . � . . .�
MINUTES
�, TTGARD PLANNING �COMMISSION
' M�Y 7, 1978
Page 10
Quimby asked if the School District and Century 21 could
get together to share the engineering costs and agr�ed
with Tepedino.
Brian agreed with i�Taod that the burden of the application
and applicant to prove the flood plain.
The moti�n passed 5-3. Sakata, Quimby and Tepedino vating
no� Corliss, Wood, Rossznan, 1�opp and Bri,an voting yes.
6. 2 A request for a Similar Use Interpretation
A request by Chuck Cota for a Similar Use Tnterpretation for a
, truck ssrVice, rental business in � San,try Tire Location on ST�1
Pacific Highway.
Commissioners agreed it was a similar use to the current use
but would still have to be heard before the P.C. as a Conditional Use.
�, COMMENTS ON MONTHLY REPORT FRQM THE PLANNING DEPAk2TMENT
�uimb state thou�ht
y c��arry inton was using his Wedding Consultant
business as a florist, having hired a full time floral arran er
g
which was not an allowable use for his Condition
al Use Permit
Application and approval by the Planning Commission. She asked
that actic�n be taken by the Planning Department.
Commissioners requested a report by staff at the next meeting on the
status of the Sierra subdivision appli,cation.
Gorliss announc�d the approval at the Design Review Board of the
84,000 sq. foot warehouse on Hunziker.
Meeting was a.djourned at 11;QQ �M.,
�
.�•
. _ .
_ _ `,
� �n
i'
4'.
�
�
�
PUB�,TC NOTI�� -- ��
TIGARD PI+ANNING COMMI�IITS��ON i
�`�`> 1K�y 2, 1978 - 7:3o pm '
Fawler �unior F��gh School - ]Gectur� Roomn
�"
10$65 S.h1. Wa�nu� � Tigard, Oregon
5 r Pr'tTD$LI� HE.�IRIPTGS �;
5. 1 ZONE CHA�d�E ZC 9-?� (Meekoms) NFO 2
A regu�st by Da;niel Maekoms for a zane map aatendment from �;
R-'� "Si�gle Family �tesidential'� to CP "Commercial �'rofessianal" ''
for e 1 .g0 acre site at �he in�ersection of SW V'aY^ns Street
and 72nd Ave (Wash. �o. Tax �ap 2�1 ip, Tax Lot 800).
5.2 ZONE CHANG� ZC 10-78 �Belanich) NPO 5
A requ�st by Roger Helanich �or a zone map a�aae�d�rtt= �'rom
B-4 W�shtng�ton County "General Con�ercial°1 to City oF �igard
C-3 "Gen�ra3l Commer�ial" for a 1.237 ecr� site at the� inter�
se�c�ion a�' Greenburg Road end Shady I�ne (Wa�h. Ca. Te�e Map
1`�� �SH, �ax �,a�t� �300, �303, 1400 �nd 1500).
�.3 C�N�JITIONAZ USE ^U 9e78 (��lve � l�ettl�b�rg� �P�J 3
A reques� by Gerald �olt�s and Donald Ket�leberg� �or a
cond�.tional use gea^mit to op�r�.te: � titl� insurance company
� in a C-4 "�teighborhood Commercialt' zone on g 6.?4 ecre
�:�. �.
�rcel at 1436� S►� Pacific Hi hws Canterbu S uare
8 Y � rY � �
�W�sho Cc. Taa Mep 2S1 10A, Taa �,ot 1700). ;;
y:
5.4 CONDIT IO1�AL I�SE cv 1 o-7e (�runat) �r�o 3
A reque�t by Herb Jundt for a conditi�nal us� perm�t faar an
outsid� d�,spley �r�g of rental ec�uipamez�t on a 2. 1 acre parcel
lacsted at the corner o� SW Pacific Hwy and Caarde S�
(W�s�i. �Co. Ta�c Map 2S1 10A, Taa 7,oi;s 1300 ari�d 1400).
5.5 CONDI�ZOIVA�, �'SE CU 12-78 (�igard Assembl.y of God� N�'0 3
A reque�t by 2lgard Assem�lg of God Cnurch for a Conditiona�.
Use permit �ur en internalYy illuminated fre� stahding sign �
at 11265 SW Gaarde (Wesh. Co. �ax Map 2S1 �DC, Taz 7,ot 1DA0) ';
6. 0�'i�R BiJSS�SS z
A request b;y Tigard SGhool District 23J to rea].�gn SW '
Ratherine S�reet between 121�st and 124th �treets«
Al1 persona havin�g an in�erest in the hear�ng metter are invited
to at�end �nd aubmit written a�►d oral teatimony or sub�it written
testimony ,in advanr.e of the meeting.
>
� Publ:�ah TT 4/24�70
r
PUBLIC NOTTCE
�IGARn PLANNING COMMI'SSTON
� May '2, 1978 - 7: 30 PM
Fowler Junior High School - Le'cture Raom
10865 S .W. Walnut - Tigard, Oregon �
5, PUBLIC HEARTNGS :
5. 1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-78 (Meekqms) NPO 2
A request by Daniel r�eekoms for a zone map amendment from R-7
"Single Family Residential" to C� "Comm�xeial Professional"
for a 1.79i acre parcel at the zntersection of S ,W. Varns St
and 7Znd Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2.51 1D, Tax Lot 800) .
5 .2 ZONE CHANGE ZC ]:0-?8 (Belanich) NPO 5
A request by I�oger Belanich for a Lone map amendment from B-4
Washington County "General Commercial" tu C--3 City �f Tigard ;
"General Commercial" .for a 1.237 acre �ite at the intersecti�n �
of Greenburg Road and Shady Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35B,
Tax Lots 1300, 1303, 1400 R� 1500) . �
;
3
�
�
�
�
�
R
_ i
I
;I
„�
_;�
A11 persons having an in�exest in the heaxing tnatter are invi�ed to °i
a-ttend and submit ora7, and wxitten �testimony o�° submit written testimon� =1
in advance o�' the meeting . '�
�ubl�sh TT A,pri1 19 and April 2G, 1978 �
s
� � � � � � ��
#
�
�
}
�
;
i
� ;
�
j
�
t
. . . . . . .� �� � . f,
�
� . . � . . � . .�
. . . . : .. � . � . . �
. . . . .. . � � � . ��
,
. . � � . . . .. ..� ....... .._... ... . ... ......._ ...__... .. . ... .... . ..... ... .. . . .. ...�
,
STAFF REPORZ' � i �
TTGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
lt4ay 2 , 19'78
Fowler Jizni:or Higk� School �- Lecture Room
10865 S .W. Wa3nut Street - Tigard, Oregon
Docket . Zone Change ZC 9-78
Request : For a zone map �mendment from R-7 "Single Famil,y ,
Residential'' to CP "Comn;�erci�:l Professional" for '
a 1 . 8 acre parcel .
Location : 7105 S .W. Varns Street (Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 1D,
Tax Lot ,900) .
Applicant : Daniel Meekoms
I . Findings of Fact :
1 . The site is designated "Commercial Professional"
on the NPO #5 Plan and is currently zc�ned R-7
Single Far�ily Residential .
2. The applicant is reque��ting to upgraae the
zoning on th� �roperty frorn the existing R-�7,
Single Family Pesidentia7 zone , to CP
,rt,. "Commercial Professional" .
'�.,:
3 . Tk�e NPO #5 Plan Map design�.tes this parcel �or
Commercial Professional Developme�t . The Plan
Text states that th� Rolling Hills Residen�i.a1
area which abutts this site should be protected
from the indus�rial development occurring
around it by:
(1) Providing a s�epping down of the intensity
of industrial use in adjacent locations. �
(2) Employing strict site development standa.rds
tr�a�t insure compatibility. 'i
;
In add�.tion , t1�e City wide p�.an poXicy that '
develo ment coincide with the provision of �
P
adequa�e u.rban servicss is p�.rti�ularly ;
relevant in �this case because of the ver
substandard condition o� S .W. Varns S�treet , �
it being nothing more than a gravel road. The �
�
re].evant pc�licy is :
"Developmen� wiXl coincxde with �the
pxovision of pttbli.c streets, wa�er and ;
seWage :Facili�ies . , , , " 4
;
�
� �
;
i
t
�
#�
STAFF REPORT
- � TIGARD PUANNTNG COMMISSION
May 2, 1'978
Page 2
�.
II . Staff Observations :
1 . The site is currently vacant and covered with a
mi,xture af conifer. and decidious �rees .
Surrounding land uses are residen`tial and irrdustrial
: properties and Highway 217 to the north and northeast .
2 . Water service is availablE to the site from the Tigard ,
' Water District `s C 8a 12 inch lines in. SW 72na and �i �!
inch in Varns Rd. Sanitary sev�er service is available '',
to the �it� via a eight inch line in SW 72nd south of '
the property, and a eight inch, line in SW Fir Loop .
3. SW 72nd Avenue is designated on �the NPO #5 Plan as a
collec�tor street requiring . 60 feet of right-of-way, '
there currently exists sufficient ri�ht-of-way except
for the southern 115 feet of the pxoperty, where the
right-of-way is only 50 �eet . Ther'efore an additonal
5 foa� ded:ication will be necessary.
SW Varns �treet is d�signated a local street requiring
50 feet of right-of-way. The necessary right-of-way '
exists for this street .
Both SW 72nd and Varns Streets are in substandard
�, conditi�n (no curbs, sidewalks, etc, ) . ,
4. Because the suhject parcel abutts a state highway (2I7)
and intexchan.ge improvements have been scheduled, the '
a�p�.icant ' s plans were transmitted to Oregan Department �
of Transportation . They responded (see attached letter) !
that af the two i,nterchange improvement designs being ,
considered, the applicant 's site developmen-t plan would '
con:�zict wi��i one alternative.
Since this is a zone change rec�uest on�y, the issue of !
site design planning and how this property �.s to relate ,
to the ir�terchange pxaject if and when it is constructed, I
shou:].d the.r�fore be deal� with as a site deszgn issue
du�ring the Design Review process. ,
III . Conclusionar� Firzdings :
1 . The request confo�rms to the P1an Map designation far
Commercial Pro�ess�.ona�. �.and us� but does not con��orm
i;o the City policy xequa.ring development �o be s�xved
by adec�uate urban services, a.rz this case streets ,
2. Varns s�t�eet must be brough�� up �o city s�andard be�ox� ,
any :Curt�er developmen� is permi��ted -�o occur a�.o�ng
i�s :�ran��.ge. Bec�.use some c�eve7.opmen� is naw using
�
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i
_ _ _
w z
� � ' r ��. . �. � .. . . .. � . . .. �
STAFF" REPORr �
TIGARD PLANNZNG CO;IV�MISSZON
r;2ay 2, 197$ 4
kage 3 C'
Varns (:pri,marily th_e c�f�iGe cpm�lex facin.� �1.7), a '
local imprc�veznent district shQUld k�e ��rznPd to bxing �'
tre street up to sta�da�d. Th� Ci..ty� has Qn �i,le n�r��� �
xemons�trance agre�ments �pr the 1o�s aY�utt�:ng �xo� �
the sauth and in the ?2nd k3usiness ��;xk whi:ch h.�s its ;,'
pxi�a.ry access q�f o� S .N''. 72nd. �.
;
i!
IV, Sta�,� RecommendatiQn, '
:
Based upon the preceeding findings o� ,��ct and
conclusions sta�f recommerads ap�ro�ya� sub,ject tQ the
�'_
,followi:ng conditions:
1 . That the property not be developed unti� S .W. a
Varz�s Street h�:s been brQU�Fit u� to C�:ty Standards , l
It is recoxnrnended th.�;t this be done by me�.n� a� a� +�'
local �mpxovement distxict, w�.th the a�p1�.Ic�.nt ��
i,ni.tiating the rec�uPSt .
2. Fi�e feet of,. add�tiona,l .right-o�-w�ay be �r�yi�led alpng
the S.W� 72nd �vent�e frontage.
3. k'ile with the Cit� Reco�de� a.n a.greement to no�:
remonstrate a�ainst a ,future Loca,l �:�p�'oyeme�ri: Dist�°ict
(LID) for stxeet im��royements t� � .W�, ?2nd A�renue and y�
� S.W. Varns Street . i�
l
�
�
:
�
� ;
;
}
�
� � � � �
_ ,_ �
, br
� ,
,
STAFF REPORT
TIGAF;D PLATJNING COMr�IISSION
�-� _
Agenda 5 .2
�- tvlay 2, 1978
Fowler Junior High Sch�ol - LectLire Room
1086'5 S.W. �Nalnut Street - '�igard, Oregon
,
�
i
Docket ; Zone Chan�e 7C 1�J-78 �
Ftequest : For a zone map amendmen.t from County B-4 "General. �
Extensive Cornmercial" to City C-3 ''General (
Commercial'' for parcel.s totalin� 1.23 aeres„ ;
Location : Intersection of SW Greenbtzrg Rd. az�d Shady Lane b
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35B, Tax Lots 1300, 1303, i.
1�00 and 150�) . !
� i`�,
i'�
�pp]_icant : Roger Belani ch ,,
i:
;.
I . Findings of Fact :
l . �he site is designated "Retail Commercial" ;!
on the NPO #? P1an Map and currently zone
Washington County B-4 (C7eneral Extensive
Commercial) .
�,
�""` 2 . The a�plicant is requestin� the application �
of i�he City of Tigard zonin� ordinance to �''
recently annexed (February 8 , 19'�8) pa,rcels '_
totaling 1 .23 acres . `'
;:.
3. City of Tigard Ordinance 78-21 (Apxi1 24, 197�)
I directs the Planning Commissi�n to conduct such
proceedings as may be necessar,y to conform the
authorized zoning and land use o� the parcel
to the requirements o:� the City ' s .7.oning �Iap
an.d Code.
II . Staff Pindings & Observations : �
1 . The sa.te is rela�;ively flat and below �rade n� �
SW Greenburg 1�d. A large oak �tree is ].ocat�d ;
�bou�� in the center o� the parcel . Surrounding �
land uses are commerci.al and industrial buildings �
�o �he wes� ; east and �outlx, Highwa,y 2J.7 is ;
loca�ed to th� nox`th. �
� � ,�:��
2 , Water sex�ice is av�.il:a�].e to the site �rom tlre �
Tigard Water Distric�ts ei�h�t inch 1a.ne in SW
Cascade AvenuE .
�r �Ii
�l
;q
��.�
�
1
�
. . .�r. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . � . .. � .. . . � ..
. .� �r. � . � . � � � ..
..Y� K . ' . . . � . . . . .
ST,A,Fk' REPORT
TI.GARD PLA�NI,NG COII4MISSIQN
A,genda 5.?
�.-..,. Ma,y 2, ].978
�;. Fowler Jun.ior High Schaol , I�eGture Room
10865 S.W'. Walnut Street -� Tigaxd„ Or��on
Sanitax�• sewPx is a�ailable �rom �he Uni,�ied
Sewe.ra,�e ,A�enr,y and ei,�ht in�h Xine in SW
Greenbux� F�Qad,
3., Sauthwest �reenbux� i� d:esig;nated' �.s an ax�fieri.al
street north of Noa^th �a;kota Street xec�ui.�in�
80-120 0� right,p,��Way. �here is cu�.rentl:y
suf�ic�,ently ,.ri�ht�o�,w�.y �o ;rneet th�se standards.,
Southwest Casc�;de A°yenue is desi�na�ted. cp�.�,,ector
st;reet requiring 60 foot minimum ri�ht-�a�nw�.y .
, There currently � xists 5Q �eet . Th�xefore, an
adc�ii�ional 5 .�ee � o.� dedicat�pn w;`7 1 bP necessa.;�y . ' ',,
i
F3oth s�authwest G'ascade A�enue and �he �rontage �
rc�a,d runnin� pa.rallel to southwest G�'Penburg Ro�.d ;
a�e a:n strbstanda�rd c�ndit�,�n (no cur.bs or, sidew�7:ks) , �
i
l"II . Corzclusio.nar,y �'indings: `�
�
I . There exists a pub�.ic need to apply City o,f Tigard
z�ning tQ a11 p�.rcels o� land in tlie ci�ty in ordex �
to �ase the �.dministr�ation o� land us�e ;re�ulations �
d•
�- an.d assulme co:nsi:s�tenc� i;hroughput the city. �
2.. The prpppsed C�•3 zonin� district is com�atibl�
with the su.r.rounding; zoning a.nd �etai� Co�mexcial
P1an desi�n�,tion. r
IV. Sta,�� Recommen�a�ian :
B sed. on �i;h� recee�.a:n indin s ct
�. P � � g o� �a ard °.
ronclusions, sta�� recoznmends a.�apxo�al suk�,jeet to the
�ollawing condati�ns :
1 . Five �e�t o� xi�ht.-p�-�way be pxovided a�.an� the
Cascac�e Aye.n�te �xontage. 'j
;
2. The �pp;lica,�xt �a::le u%ith the City Recorder �,n �,;i,
agreement no� �o re�ons�xate a�a,i:nst a Lpcal
Zmparovement Distxic�t (T�TD� �ar s�xee� im��ov�ments "a
tq SW Cascade Ay�:nue and �the �xpn�age road �.1o�g
the so�the�s�ern. �ax�:ion o� tlae pra��art,y ; ;�
;i
,-�
:.:i
,I
i
;i
� ;��1
;
� I
il
i
t'
i
. � � . . . � . . . ��.
. . . . .. . ���.
f
�. . . . ....... . .. .. .....
, -, , �
l
� ,
�
STAr�F REPORT �
TIGARD PL�NN3NG COMA2ISSIQN �
� A�enda 5. 3 ,
May 2, 1978 �
Fowler Jun.iox High School - Lecture Room i
10865 S .W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon �
E
�
Dc�cket ; ron�iti;onal Use Permit CU 9-78 0
�
i
Request : To operate a title insurance cornpany in a C-4 �
"Neighborhood �ommercial" zone on a 6 . 74 acre ;
parcel (Canterbury Square) .
Location : 14363 S .W. Pacific Highway {Wash. Co . Tax T1ap �!
�:
2S1 1DA, Tax Lot 1700) . ;
Applicant : Gerald Ko1ve and Donald Ket�leberg `'
T . Findings of Fact :
1 . Trie site is desi�na�ed on �the NPO #3 Plan
as F�etail Commercial arxd zoned C-4
"Neighborhood Commercial" .
2 . Tk�e proposal to locate a title insurance in
a C-4 zone requires conditional use approval
by the Plann.in� Commission. �
�.
3. The applicable policy frozn the NPO text is the
$
following:
Policy 20 - Businesses on Pacific Hi�hway should ;;
be oriented to the existing traffic
ana not draw additiar�al traf.fic from
the adjacent community. Any additional
convenience or neighborhood centErs '
should be centrally located to the
m�.rket area they serve .
4 . On Apri1 12, 1977 the Tigard llesign Review
Board approved a request by the applica.nts to �
construct a 1 , 700 saua;re Foot addition to �
Canterbury Squas�e adjacen� the Thriftway Store.
The ap�licants have subsequently constructed,
tkiis building which has remained vaca�t, 1
5. The city n�� stree� parkin� code requires the `
Can�erbury Shopping Center to have �15 pa�.rking
spaces. The p�oposed use wou�.d requirP arz
additional. 5 spaces as �er coc�e, for a to�aX
qf 320 spaces. Th�re are curren�ly 328 �xis'�i.ng
paxking spaces. ,
� �
!
�
j;
�
� }4 .. . � . � . . �.. . .. � . . . . � . � � . . � .. � ..
. .J` .� . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
STAFF REPOftT
TIGARD PL�NNING COMMISSION
Agenda 5 .,3
Ptiay 2, 1978
fiT . Conclusionary Findings :
The requ�st conforms to the Comprehensive Plan
(NPO #3) because a title insurance office is
considered a low intensit� use and wouYd be
compatib.le with the adjaeent retail uses within
the sho�ping center.
ITI . Staff Re�ammendation :
Based on the preceeding Findings of Fact and
Conclusions, sta:Ef recommends �:pproval o� the
a.pplicant ' s request as submittede
�
;
i
,
I
- i
i
i
�
�� i
�
�
u
�
J
!
�
7
1
i
i
. .. , , _
t
,
�
STAk'�' R�E�ORT
AGENDA 5 .4:
TIG,ARD PLANNING CO�VIMISSION
�,� May `2 , 19'78
Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room
108Fi5 S .W. W'alnut St . - Ti:gard, Oregon
Docket : Condi�;ional Use Permit CU 10-78
Request ; Fo:r outside d3sp:lay and stQxage of sales and rental:
equipment on a 2. 1 acre parcel in a C-4 aone.
Location; Corner o� S .`V. Gaarde Stxeet and the Paci�ic
Highway �rqntagP road (Wash. Ca . Tax h�a� 251 ,
10A, Tax Lots 1300 and. 7.400) .
Applicant ; Herb Jundt
I . Findings o� ;E'act ; i
l . The site is desi.�n�.ted on the NPQ #3 Pl�n as ?
"Retail� Commercial" and curxently zone C-4 �
"Neighboriloc�d Commerci,al" ,
2. Section 18 . 32 .030(8) ,pf Ti�ard Municipal Code
states ",Any bus�,ness, sexv1ce, processing,
st�rage ox d�:spla.y essentia.l or iricidental to �
� any permitted use ira the C-4 zone and not �:
conducteci entxrel,y withi.n an enclosed building �
requires conditional use appxoval by tY�e '
Pla.nnin� Commission. �
t
3. On ,April 18, 1978 the Tigard Planning
CommissiorY determined that the retail sales and
xenta,l sto,re being pxo,ppsed �n the site was
sirnil.ax i;o a hardware or department s�ore which
are permitted uses in a C-4 zone.
4. Tk�e site is situa�ted below the grade af �aci�a.c
Hi,�hway and the �rontage road seryicing Canterbury
Squaxe. A, s�.ngle �ami.l,y res�dence is located in �
the nox�h weste�l,y coxr�er o� the pdree7. , SurxQUnclin� ;'.
land uses are commercial and �esi.dential �xoperta.es .
5. The ap�licant is x�qu�sting pexmissa.oz� �ox two
autszde st,oxa�e a�ea,s appx�pximatea� 52 x �.32 �eet `'
xn area, This stoxa�e �.s �o l�e �nc7.osed wi�h a I
fence axc�und �lxe pera.met�r o� both areas . �'he !
a�p�.a,cant xs �uxthex p�ogosi�ng th�ee o��s�.de disp�.ay ',
axeas �o be sa:��u�.`�e�l in th;e nar�heast cornex o� �
�lae sa.te, T�iese ''displa� axeas�� wc�u7 d be �I
approxima.�ex,y 18 � 54 :�ee� an siz� ;iz� �vk�]i.cY� eq�ipmPn� ,;
� �o be sr��.d c�ar re�x�ed would �e 7.oc��e��
� � � � � � � � ���;�
;G:,�
. . ���. ��. � � � . . � . . . . �. . .. . .. . .
6 STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5.4
TIGARD PLANNING CC1r�rhISSION
� Pa,�e 2 I
A list of equipment which is to be displayed '
in thes� areas has be�n included wzth the
applicant ' s submission. Sorne equipment would '
be over 6 feet in hei�ht such as "power past
hole diggers on trailers and tractors with
front loader �r trailer'' .
6 . Due ta the grade di�ference between the frontage
road/Pacific Highway and the subject parcel,
both the outside storage and outside display
areas wi1,1 be quit� visibl.e �rom either street .
While some of the items are meant to be seen
(in display areas) , �ropos�ed method of screening
is not adequate.
7. Southwest Gaarde Street is deszgnated on the
NPO #3 Plan as a collector street requ.iring
60 feet of right-of-way. There is currently
40 feet . Tlzerefore an additional 10 feet of
right-of-way shall be necessary.
II . Conclusionary Findings :
,:�
� l . The proposed site plan is u�acceptable beca�se
of the proposal to display renta.l equi�ment ,
�,nd because the areas for staxage will be
partially visible from the roadway. There are
design alternatives which Lan be employed to
minimize the visual impact of the storage .
The submitted plan is attempting to make the
wares being rented and sold both visible and �
part�ally wisible �.s a form o:f �,c�vertising. f
This is a common operati�� technique for this
type of busixtess; Power Rents, Baxbur Rental, �
and Bob ' s Rent al on 114cLoughl in al l being �.
examples .
.Any site plan should screen the storage area �
h
as much as possible and no display should be
permxf:ted. Staff is of �he o�inion �h�.•� the
relevan� issucs are, first �he a.ppropriatenc;�s
of the land. use and secondly, the design
r�va.ew rP1a'ted question , The P1,anning Commxs�ion �.
should there�ox� se�ve �o pro�r�.de the �ol:Lowa.ng
guidance: 'I
,
7. � Xs the Xand use �pprc�pri�,te i ,e, o�tside
storage a� �his 1.oca,�ian? �
� T
a��'
� � � ��
� �;��
t
� _. ._ _ _
.
`,
9 � . . .. � . . . .. � . � .. .
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5.4
TTGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Page 3
2. What are the relevant c:riteria to be used
in the design review process?
Concerning #1 aboye, it is staff 's opinion
that a sales and renta,l facility serving the
ne�ds of primarily residential customers is
appropxiate at this lc�cation. However, this
- is n.ot an appropriate site to serve the
construction industry from. Businesses serving
the construction industry (such as Power Rents) '
should local;� in industrial zones (as they are) .
In fact , this aspect of the use is, in staff ' s
opinion, nat similar to any of the permitted
uses in the C-4 zone which is designed primarily
to provide goods and services to the residential
community. In addition, the applicant 's
submission s�ai�e� that outside displ.ay i,.�, a
necessity of the operation. If this is tru�,
then this Iand us� is not appropriate at this
location .
Concerning #2, i�t is the staf�'s opinion that
�� the tol7.owing criteria should be used for evaluating
any site plan.
A. The storage areas shoul�. be scre�ned �rom view
as much as possible with the most sui`table
location �or outside storage being in the rear
of the paxcel and directly behind the
Cant�burST Shopping Center buildings. The
applicant 's building coul.d then be lacated
betweeiz i�he Highway and the storage a.rea. (This
has been done rather success�ully with a rental
outlet in Beaverton on TnV. Highway) .
B. The screening should include landscap3ng as
well as �encing and additional Yandscaping
should be provxded on Gaaxde Street ,
C. No outside displ,ay axeas should be pexmitted.
III . Sta�� Ftecommendat�.ons : '
I3ased upon the preceeding �indings a:� �ac� an� conclusa.ons
s�:a�� recommends that this reques� be dexixed.
I:f the P�,anning Commiss�.on chooses to appro�e �his
,� requ�st s�a�1' recomm�nds: The �a7.lowing conc�itions
� b� ap,p�.�.ed:
_ i
. w '!
; b . . . . . . � . . . . .. . . �: � � � � � . . . . �;'.
:« a - . . . . . . . . . , . . . .. . . . . �. .
c>.. � . . . . . . �. . .� . � � .. . � . . .... � :`;
` 'STA�'F RE�'ORT
AGENDA 5.4 '.
TIGARD PLANNI'NG COMMTSSTON
��� , Pa�e 4
1 . S�les and xentals be res�aricted �xo�n
servin� the construction industry with '
powex �auipment .
2. No outside display be permi�ted.
3. The deaign criteria specified in the
Conclusionary Findings 'be utilized for
Design Review.
4 . Ten feet of right-of--way be dedicated
a�ong the Gaarde Str�e•i: frontage for
si;reet imprc�vement gu,rpnses.
i
i
��: �
�
f
�:
a
a
�� � � � � '�a
,
:�i;
�i
;'
,�
'1
i,
��
� y�
��
;
��
� i
�
`s
r
� fi.
a
'i
i
l
�
�
STAFF REPORT �
'�IGARD P�ANNING COMMISSION I{
AGENDA 5:5 1
May 2, 1978 �
Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room ;
10865 S .W, Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon �
� F
.
. ; • 2-78 Ti arcl Assembly of God) �
Docket . Cond.�tional Use l ( g
�
Request : A request by Tigard Assembly o� God Church for �
a conditional use permit for an internally �
illuminated �r.ee standing sign . �
s
Location; 11265 S,W. Gaar�e 8t . (Wash. Co . Tax 1!4ap 2S1 �
3DC, Tax Lot 100) i
i
�
� Applicant ; Rev. A.M. Hultgrerr 6
� I . Finding Of Fact : �
r
W
1 . The si�te is zone "�.-1Q" single family residential
and de�ignated suk�urban density ori NPO �#3.
2 . Section 123.20 .020(4) list� churches as a conditional
u,e in the R.-10 zone. The church in questi�n has
recezved the necessary approvals .
i
�� 3. Section 16 . 36.020(7.a) states : �
Freestanciing sigr�s for c�nditional. uses in �
r�sidential and mul.ti.-fami].y zones shall be
subject to review by the Planning Commission ;:
according to the procedurea prescribed in ''
Chapter 18, Section 72, Conditional Use, for
which the following standards are recommended:
Street Type Height A.rea
;,
Local 8' 12 sq. ft . per sign �ace
Col.lector 1`L ' 20 sq. :�t. per sign f ace
Arterial 16 ' S5 sq. :�� . per sign face ;
;,
.�
4. Southwest Gaarde Street is designated a collector
street in �the Tigard Municipal Gode and NPO #3 . ;{
II . Conclusiona�y Findings : '
1 . The sign will face SW Gaarcie St . and �here�ore may '
be 12 :�eet ta].1 with 20 sqnare feet per sign f�,ce.
2 � The applicant is p�oposin� to ereci: a 4 foot �a11. �
sign 2 1/2' x 8 '= 20 sq. � t per sign f ace. The t
�
� '
�
?
;
;;
j;
�;
_ _ _ , ..
r � . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
I
.. . � . . . � . � . � � . . � . . . �.. . . � . . � � � � �� ��7
;STAFF REPORT �
_ i
`�IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
;' AGENDA 5.5 �
May 2 , 1�78
Page 2 �
sign will be double face� , internally illuminated �
plexiglass . Tt will ta.ke the place of an e�isting
freestanding sign. �'
�;
'�.
3 . An internally il-luminated plexi�lass signs are ' �;
normally associated with eommercia7, activities. �
It is questionabl,e wh�ther this type of illum�nation '
and ma'terial wotala be compatible with the residential �
en�ironment . �i
�;
III . Staff Recommendations : t
G,
. . .. � . . � . � � � F;.
�s
StafF recommends approval with the following conditons : ti
� � ��
1 . Internal illumi:nation not be allowed. `
;
;,
2. Applicant expl�re the use of athei ma�te�°ials
(s�ch as wood) that woul.d be more c;ompatible f,
with the residential environment .
f'
}G:
(•.
���
.���isr
�5
�,
4
ji
t;�
j;'
}'.
i';
� };
��.:
i!SI
f'
�;
� i�;'
1i
�:
i
�
t
''
j:
�;
9
,
�:
�
t,
. �.:
ri
M � `
� i
� . . . � . . � �i��
� � ��
.. � � � .. . . � �-»+
. , ..
.
`: � ': ,.. ,
,,
, -< ;�, .��
i
MEMOI�ANUUM i
��,,,q� TO: Pla�nning Commission:
FROM': Planning Department
SUBJECT; RPquest To Realign S.W. KathErine S�;reet '
Right-Of-Way
DATE; May 2; 1978
- ;�
The Tigard School Di�trict is requesting; that Katherine �;
Street be realigned as per the attached drawing. While ;
theix• submitted written material does not directly state
why the I7i.strict is seeking the change, they do present #
a convincing case for making the realignment. Their
submission addt�esses all o� the relevant issues and
staff concurs with the finding.s made and conclusion '
reached by th� a�plic;ant . i
Staff therefore r�commends that the reques�t be approved
sub je�ct to �rie followa:n� conditions : ;
1 . Th:at the SchoQ1 District initiate vacation
preceedi.ngs on the existing Katherine
Street right-of--way.
� . That th� Schaol District proceed to dedicate
��4 the subject realignment concurrent with
vacation of the �xisting alignment .
3. That the gar�,ge structu�e adjacent 121st
�treet be xemoved before the realigned
Katherine Stree� be u�ilized for any
puipose (such as access �or c�nstruction
traf�ic to the school site) .
�
�