Loading...
Planning Commission Packet - 08/17/1976 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. .-,� '�� �� � �I AGENDA �igard Planning Commission AUguSt 17 , 1976 - 7; 30 P .M. Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 uW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon � 1 . CALL TO ORDER; 2. ROLL CALL: � 3. APPFtOV�L OF NIINUTES : � � �r. COn4NIUNICATIONS : � � 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS : "� �` 5. 1 Zt)Nk; CHANGE ZC 4-'75 (Bunn) �; A, request by Ken Bunn for general plan and prograzn review ��; of a proposed reszdential plann��c� dEVelopment located at - SW 109th Av�nue ancl SW Canterbury La.ne. (Wa.sh . Co. Tax ��! rdap 2S1 lOAD tax lot 8800) . `" € � (Tabl.�cl �rom 8/3/76) `; ,s. 5.2 CONDITIONAL USE CU 23-76 F� k: ��,� A reques�t by M & S, Inc/Anton Schulz to locate a pro- �? fesui�n�.I o.f f ice bizilding at SW Pacif i.c Hwy. (Wash. Co . �; �`� Tax i�Iap 1S1 36GL1 tax lot 140�) � 5. 3 CONBITIONAL USE CU 2�?-7�i (Allied T�ealt,y) �`� A request by Al McFarlan�i, Allie� Realty Company t� locate ` a family activity center in a C-3 ?one (General CommErcial) at 1"3�50 and 13400 S.W. Paci�ic Hwy. (Wash. Co . Tax Map ?:'S, Z lot 100 200 500 and o00. � 2S1 CC, tax s , , , ) t;: 5.4 VARIANCE V-7-76 (Nationa]. Saf e1:,y Gom��any) � �" A r�quest by Natianal Sa�ety Compan,y �or a variance to the � landscaping and side yard setb�:cli in a ��-� (Light Industrial) at Bonii;a Road west of S .W. 72nd. (Waski. Co . Tax Nlap US1 1�2A, tax l.ot 1900) . t; �'; 6• SUBDIVISIO'N �� r.. 6. 1 MTNOR LANll PARTITIQN MLP 6-76 (Flett) � rs G` A request by William Flett to partition a 6?, acr� paxcel i, o:f land in a M-3 zone (Light Industrial) at the southwest � corizer ot' S.W. 72nd 9venue anc�. S .W. Bonita Roa,d. (4Vash . �` Ca. Tax Ma� 2S1 l�A, tax lot 1700j k � � ., < , . , . , .,_ �.^� A aY }((` .� Y j;,l z.:l AGENDA i`� Tigard Planning Commission �� Au�ust 17, 1976 �" � Page 2 �'� �,;. ��'�-, 7. PF�1I SCELLANFOUS ��; t.:: �' 7. 1 SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 6-76 (Chevron Service) i'r; A request by Rasmussen Chevron Service For a variance of S`' Title 16, Sigr� Regulations ir� a C-3 zone (General Commer- �:; cial) at 11747 S.W. Pacif ic Highway. (Wash. Co. Tax i�Iap (�; 1S1 36CD, ta� ]_ot 1001 , 1001 Al) . �% t. r: 7. 2 SIGN COD� APPEAL SCA 7-76 (Tigard Muffler) �` i: F. A request by Tigard Muffler for a vari�,nce of '1'itle 16, ;`; Si�n Regulation in a C-3 zone (Gene.ra,l Commercial) at ': 13970 S.W. Pacific Highway. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 3DD, �; tax lot 1200, 1200 Al) . �'{ 8. OTHEP ]3USINESS ;:', f; 9. A�JOU�,N141ENT: �; c;: �, ��;�' ��, f'3 � E'; 1+. i. ;;. I'' �� f;: i: ��' ', �i t. f t �'' �.: }�,i !;; �'. IS c �a �3 � �� � Irk_.. . —,._...._.�,.._ , , . ; � ,_ ;�. ..__ _ �;:,... _ .� r.0 , , . ,.. ., _ , ; _ . __ ._ . . __ ,. �,... . _ .. ; �° ��� � �:�"� �,�rti k- �� £� . � t;,. r �, �.'' � �;�; 5�� MINUTES ��;� °f Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 - 7;30 P.M. �'�'� �� Twality J�.r. High - Lecture N,00m ��;,: `� 14650 S .W. 97th Aventie - Tigard, Oregon �;,�: ���': ��; J. . CALL TO OI�D�R: The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 by �� Chairman Popp. '',� ;r,' 2. ROLL CALL: Present : Pop�, S�.kata, Krause, Tepedino, Nicoli, and Phillips. �xcused Absence: Moore and Goldbaci� . €"` ��", Unexcuseu Ausence: Porter. �` � � ! St�.ff : Uaniels, Edwards . � r,,,, � :; 3. AgPROVAL OF MINUTES : Minutes o:f 8-�-76 appraved as submitted. F �. COMMUNI�ATIQI�S : None. � ° �';'' 5. PU1�3LIC HE�RINGS : ` �' i ; r=;,: 5. 1 ZON� CHANGF ZC 4-75 (Bunn) �'� � ; A request by Ken Bunn for. general plaz� and p.rogram review of �� �,; a prop�sec�. r��iclential planned development loe�.ted at SW I�.. I09th Avenue anc! SW Cani;erbury Lane. (Wash. Co. T�,x Map ,;x � 2S1 lOAD Tax Lot 8800) . ���� �,. [�. �taf.f Report : Read by Danie].s. �� �F�, _:;� B. Ap�lica:nt ' s Presentation : �� r; Joseph Van Loom, project archi�ect, explained that th:e 4` new p1an contained all the paints recomme�dec� in the last ,a. �,<y; � � meetin�. � � �;, �,�i C. Public Testimnny : �`' G,;:. o Dale Conn - Cal.away Hills H�meowners A��c�c. stated � �: that the Association had not yei: met to decide whether �j a sEwer easement woul.d be granted. {i, � � ��� D. Sta:f� Recommendations: q'� ��: Sta�f rec�mme�!ds approval wi.th the �ollawing conditioils : �i � � � � ���� l . Storm sewer system be approved by Fngineering �� Depar�;ment prior to �ubmission to the City C�uncil �" for general plan and program review. �' r �� . . � . � . . ��:. 2. That SW 109th Avenue be improved to city standa.rd:s � of 34 ' �avement width on a 50' righ;t-of-way frorn its � � � � �� � � � existing end point to the iiitersection with the , sou�l7erly loop drive entirely on the' applicant 's , � � s� , ,. . �, - - ., , .- _ ?� , : ,� ..._._ ._ , ;: , _. _.. ._.�, ._ � __ _ _ __ . . _ . _ t , "MINUTES `` � `�° � � r, �� 'Tigard Planning Commission ,� • August 17, 1976 "' �; Pag� 2 ��; �;,. � _ �a property and a 25 ri�ht of-way be provided along tlle rest of the parcel 's west property 1ine. ✓ 3. That a street plug b� attached alon� the west side �ti of the SW 109th Avenue right-o�-way until such time {: �!, as the remainder of I09th (adjacent this property) �, is developed, `'' �. FK:; 4. The existing �treet plug at the end of l0�th be ��I' �.: � vacated. = i>; ,�;� 5. The areas along the loop drive not shown f.or parki.ng !'� r,,; spaces be signed to prohik�it parking along that street . � �! 6 . A 15 ' wid� easement for public sewers be established. 4,'� ,., _ �' �. Aa:1 sidewa.lk an.d trails terminate in whee:Lchair ramps . r;' ��' ,,,, i:; 8. Stree�t lights to P.G.E. standarc�s for Engineering �� Department approval . �;;; �! J . Thn trail shown in the nort��ern half of the development �r° �? be �' asphalt paths and the trail �n the soutl�ern �,� p��rtion be left natural with mi.nimal improven�ex�t� o:f ��'; crusheci gravEl of three to iour inche� o� �com�?�.��ec� '� ������ bark. 10. A minimal of six picnic areas be establish�d within the forested area; desi�n and 7.ocation subject ta �;' appxova,l by P.lanning Direct�x. � � ; 11 . Application to rectify �he partitiani.ng �rok�lems be ' initiated prior to consideration o� the �eneral plan �' and program by the City Council . ��'� �'� l�. R��use conta�.ners be pxoperly scr.eened. (. � �{ E. Rebuttal : None. �< F. Commission Discusszon : �� o Krause asked that a condztion 13 �e added stating �;; that the applicant a�ree to maintain the prop�sed �; park land until such a time as the City �.ccepts the �` area into the City paxk �system. �� � � � � � � � � �����; x- o �rause questioned staff abotzt t:he future stre�et i� a.lignment . T �G �; � � Staff r�s��Und�d that the proposed r�ght-o�-way allows for real:i.�nment. �� that the ra osal � c� Kraus� mo�red and Tepedino s�conded p p be accept�d based on findings in the staff report � � , ' M I NUTE S ��., ��,..,,: � "Tigarc� Planning Commission � August 17, 1976 Page 3 � with the st�.ff recommendations with the addition af #13 . The m��tioi7 was approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.2 CONDITIONAI, USE CU 23-76 A req�est by M. & S. , Inc . /l�nton Schulz to locate a pro- fessional office building at SW Pacific Highway. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD Tax Lot 140U) . A. Staff Report : Reaci by Dan�els. B. Applicant 's Presentation: o Jerxy Robzns�n, project architect, described the new traffic circu7.ation pattern and the basic elements of ��he plan. o Daniels asked i� existing bil].board was on the ap�1 icani; ' s propert,y . o Anton Schulz, owner, stated that the billboa.r.d was on his property and that he would �;ry �;o have it removed � as soon as t11e IeasE expired. ���,Y. C. Pu.blic Testiman,y: None. D. StafF Recommendation : Approval a� submit�:ed with the :�ollowing c�nditzons: l . A signing program for entire parcel submitted �;o � Design Revie�v B�oard. � � 2. Existing billboard be r�m�v�d witlairi 6 months. �; E. 3. Screen pTantings be added tc� the n�xth side oi' the '�'? building to sc.r.��n the adjacent �es��cil�2. ;-i �_� � o Sakata asked the nearby residence be scr�ened �rom ' the o�fic� building. �' i;; o Rabinsc�n sta.ted that this was shou�n on the l�;r�dscape f` p l.�,s�. � , �, � � � � ��`:� f:; E. Commission Di.scussian ; �;�, I!� o Staf� informed the boarcl -that Design l�eview wo�Id f�' �� study the architectura7. and sa.te plan. �;� �,; +,. o Philli.ps moved and �epedino seconded that th� pro- fi�'� posal. be approved based on the :findi.ngs in th� ��taff }r ��;' �`. <i ��. -- � ' �,. �'�r: • ,MINUTES , Tigard Planning Commission August 17, ].976 Page 4 �_- report with the staff recommendations . The motion was approved by unani.mous voice vote. 5. 3 CONDITIONAL USE CU 22-?6 (Allied Rea.lty) � request by Al McFarland, Allied Realty Compan,y to locate a family activity center in a C-3 zone (General Commerci_al) at 13450 and 13400 S.W. Pacifi� Hi�hway. (Wasl1. Co . Tax Map 2S1 2CC, tax lots 100, 200, 500, and 800. ) A. Staff keport : Read b,y Daniels. B. Applicant 's Presentation: i a Jol7n Amur�.svn - Amundson & Associates , presented a ', colored site plan and ex�lained i;he �neme ancl � activities �l the cen�er . j � � o Sakata asked that �:he circulation �attex�n be clarif.ied. , I o Applicant agreed to work wi.th the Ci�:,y Engineering � Department on the traffi� situation. � o Sakata asked tizat �i�he exis�ting trees and natural dra.inage pattern be retained whenev�r possible. o Staff. asked the applicant �o explain why this site was chosen . o Amundson stated there was a public need, and that the i site iiacl e:xcel.lent access to a m�tiin throughfar� and ; the freeway. � t o A1 McI'arlaz�d, A11ied Realty, enumerated an the � faci.Ii�ties, security, and standards. C. Public Testimony: o Lloyd Schulz, Tualatin Homeowners Assoc�ation, Pastox• Holgrir�, Assembly of God Church, Bill Hoel, Portland, and �Tohn Setnikex, neighbor, in�ormed the Commission that tlaey were in favor of the proposal . o Bi11 Brennan o� Crestmer Dx�ive expressed concern about thc po�sible use of Cresmer I?rive by the lacili��. o Popp �xplained that Cresmer Drive would not be u,sed. � � ll. Staf:f Recomr:�ei�ctai:ions : � Ap�roval wi�h the following conditions: �, _ _ _ - .,....,.__,�. ., ,,,. � ....,� , ��.:...__�._�. . :_ . _ . .... _ ._..:� . . ..__. .. ,;_..... _ _ _ _ ;: � � ti ��.:;. �� ' ,MINUTES �} ' Tigard Plannirig Commission � Au�'ust 17, 1976 ��� �age 5 ; r':�- {'�. l . The nor�hern terminus of the frontage road be re- �;`;' a].ign.ed and improved matching the center line with r' SW Park Street and having a 50 ' road approach onto `�' Pacific Highway. This work to be approved by the � �{ OSHD and Tigard Engineering Department . �; �; 2, The southern tezminus be cl�sed. �; 3. The frontage road be improved t� city local street �' standards to the northern access point into �tne �' � main paxking area with the remainder of the �x•antage �T' road landscapec�. �` �� ,,; 4. A 6 ' bicycle/pede�trian path b� included through �:� the si�te �to match up with the one a�i�ro�ved as part ;:� �f th.e medicalJdental clinic . �� �:; 5. The applica.nt agree t� participate in the costs of i�; a street light for the intersection of the frontage road and SW Pa:cific liighway. j�`; x 6. The Oregon Transportation Commission be petitioned �`� ta reliraquish juri_�;dic�tion to the City fax� the �^° �: ������ frontage road. � 7. A grading pla�a be submitted �for Design Revi�w I3oarc� � revi.ew. s� ��� E. Re�,utta.l : ��'� xt; ;,�. o Krause asked that tne lc�cation �f th� pro�osed Gy, bicycle/pecl�striari path and gr.eenway be clarii'ied. �`� �; o Staff pointed out several location alter�natives. �:: �," F. Commiss.ion Discussion ;` ��' o Kra,u.s� mavecl and Nicoli seconded �tha�t th� �rap�sal i�; be approved basecl �ii the �indi:�gs ir +he sta.ff repor�L- �' ti� with the sta�f recommendations. � �': � � � � rr� o S�.kata asked �F;hat Design Revi.ew pay particula�c k� atten:tion to: tennis cnurt lighting, office builda:ng �� hei ht reenwa s stem circulation attern mass ';', � , g Y Y , P , r„ transit, and a bus shelter. t �: The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. �� ��: S�aff request;ed� that agenda item 6.l be consider�d be�ore agenda �,r item 5.4 as the lot would have to be legally created before a E� > . . I¢ �an�e cou].d bE allowed. A licant of 5 .4 Johr� Skour�tes N var�. pp , � , 1. a , � k ob 'ectecl to uta�i s r.e uest . J q �: , � ;. I �, _ _ _- t i. , ��,, ' 4`�, 4. 4. � e s: MINUTES [ii Tigard Planning Commission C '�I - August 17, 1976 � , � �:, Page 6 i: l'� i'I Chairman Popp agreed to hear the items in order. � ', i'';I 5.4 VARIANCE V-7-76 (National Safety Company) �;i A request by National Safety Company for a, variance to the i�'� landscaping and side yard setback in a M-3 (Light Tndust.rial) at Bonita Road west of SW 72nd. (V'Jash . Co. Tax Ma.p 2S1 12A, �ta.x lot 1900) . A. Stafi Report : Read by Daniels. o Stafl presented a letter from the applzcant . ;';a B. Appli�cant 's Presentation o John Skourtes, appl.ic�.nt , stated tha� his letter contained all tlze information needed by tize Commission. r,,s o Kxaiase asked why th� rear or th� lot had not bc�eri ,;:; developed. ;, a Skourtes ex��lained �the site plan and building location. rr ; �k o Kin�i Lo an Art Lutz Realt '1' g� , y, explained the flood plain problem and resultant buildin� location. �,:; t i C. Plablic Testimariy - Nc�ne. ;! ', D. StaF:L kecommendations: ;:' Staf:f recommended that the ma�t�er be i:abled until �Lhc-; ", r= lot was legally create�l. ,,,; �; E. Commission Discussion : �'' Krause moved and Tepedino seconded to table the item ;',',; until agenda item 6.1 was considered. !� ;;,:; The motion was approved b,y unanimous voice vote, r`: �;:' 6 . 1 A4INOR LAND PARTITION MLP 6-?6 (Flett) � A xec�uest b,y William Flett to partitio� a 6�• acre p�;rcel c�f �,`,: land in a M-3 zone (Light Industrial) at the sauthwest corn�r �' o� SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road. (WasYi. Co. T�,x Ma� ��`� ;,. 2S1 12A, tax lot 1700) . ;.;;f ;;, E:,; A. Staf.:� ReY�ort : reac� by naniels �;j �'' o Phillips asked i.f i:li� Neighborhood Plan Organi.za•t:.c�n f:�; had been consulted. �n Ge=. 1 y y; .. . .. .� �;�. , J l� . n � , /i�, f,n � . e V' 4 �4..yy ` b , MTNUTES �igard Pl�,nning Commission �,�;�s August 17, 1976 '"•Y Pa�e 7 �: o Staf�f repla.ed that the NPO chose not to meet and review the proposal . B. Applicant ' s Presentation o Kim Logan, Art Lutz RPalty, expla,ined the partitioning pat�tern . o �taf� a�sked if the property had been offered for sale prior to the partitioning. o Logan replied that it had been. o William Flett, owner o:L 1;he land, stated that he was unaware o� the f].00� plain ordinance. C. Public Testimon,y ; a Pastor Holgrin, Assembly o� God Church, expressed the wish �;hat the Commission and the applicant could find an agreeable solution. Y D. Sta�f Recommendation : ,�, Appro�al wi�th the �ollowing condition.s : 1 . Dedication of 10 ' the entire len;th o:€ the parcel along SW Bonita Road and 20 ' th� entire lengtk� o� �, the parcel al�ng SW 7�nd Avenue, e- �'� 2. An agreement to participate in a local improvement � district to im�rove SW 72nd Avenue to city arterial �'� street standards and: SW Bonita Road to city co:�.lector �'1 street stanc�ards be filed with the City Recorder. ' t 3. The legal documents rEquired in conditions on� and ��: two be satis�ied prior to rPCOrding of the p�,xtition. k; �., E. Rebutta7. : ��` !'; . (> o Skourtes that the Bonita Road 1:ocal impravement district �'." b� clarif iPd . �� �,' o Sta�� stated that the local improvement di�trict would ' probably encompass the are� from I-5 to Hall Blvc�. �y� �; �,, o Mr. Hauken asked what the cost of averagE i,mprovemen�; . ' �� o �taf� �xplained that the cos�t varied according� to ,�t���.et 'a' �� and type of uses. ��; �� �,; ;i; �� � _ � �. _,._ ..:., .�...N , . ._,.. .. -:� r ; . �� " ° • �_ �u..y • � MINUTES , Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 Page 8 �i'' �:. F. Commission Discussion o Sakata moved and Krause seconded to approve the I proposed partition.ing b�.sed on iindings in the ! staff report with the sta:ff recommez�dations. �, The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. i Agenda item 5.4 previously tabled was xesumec� with Commission I Di scussion , F. Commission Discussion o Krause stated that th� building cauld be designated to adhere to the code. o Tepedino stated that no extraordinary conditions ' beyond control o:� the ar.�pl.icant exist for a va.riance to be granted. , Krause moved and Sakata aeconded to deny the request because the property could be developed wi�hout the granting o:f a variance. '�.� The motian was appx•o�red by unanimou.s voice vote. 7. 1 SIGN CODE APP�AL SCA 6-76 (Che�vr��n Service) A request by Rasmussen Chevron �ex�vice :for a variance o� Ti�tle 16, Sign Reg�zlatir�ns in a C-3 zone (General Commer- _ cial) at 1174? SW Pacific Highway. (W�,sh. Co. Tax Map IS1 36CD, tax 1ot 1001 , 1Q01 Al) . o Chairman Popp stated that a con�ls.ct of interest existed and that he would chair the h�aring but w�uld not take. part in the discussion or vote. �. S�ta�� Report : Read by Daniels. �3. Applicant 's I�resentation: o Wilbur Rasmussen, applicant, r�ad letter 1;o the Commissioners and offered to take down �;he existing price sign. o Gary Williamsony Standard Oil Representative, describec�. the pro��osed sign and stated the economic hardship imposed by not grantin� the variance. , ; C. Public Testimony : o James Page, Tigard Muf:fler Shop, supported the appli-" � _ , i • rnzNUTES �,� �,�. „ aTigard Planning Commission . August 17, 1976 Page 9 cant 's proposal . D. Staff Recommendations : Staff recommends denial based on the intent of the Tigax•d Community Plan to improvP the visual envixon- ment o� Paci:fic Highway. E. Rebuttal : o Williansen stated that he dicl not agxee with the sta#f :finding on the economic hardship. o Krause a��l�ed whe�ther the previous sign was iden�tifying or advertising tYs business. o Rasmussen stated it was identi�ying the station. o Nicoli stated that the site conditions warranted ; another sign. � Sakata moved and Tepedino seconded to dEny the motion since the proposed sign was intended to acivertize products and pricES rather than identify the business. . A roll call vote ascertained 3 in favor - 1 dis- senting Nicoli and 1 abstentioii - Phillips. 7.2 SIGN CODE APPE�L SCA 7-7� (Ti�axd Muffler) ; A rec�uest by Tigard Mu��ler for a variance of Title 16, Sign � Regul.ation zn a C-3 zone (Gen�ral Commercia.l) at 13970 SW � Paci:P ic Highway. (Wash. Co. 'T'ax M�,p �Sl 3DD, tax lo�r 1200, � 1.2�0 A1) . � � A. Stat� A,epnrt : Read by Daniels . � 13. Applicant Presentation: i o James Page, appli_�ant, corrected the sta�f report to � ;read 1 wall. sign 3z' x 8 ' rather tha.n 2 wall signs � 4' x 8 ' , de�cribed his requESt and his 1;enant relation- ! ship with Exxon. � � C. Pub].ic Testimony - None. � f D. Sta:f f Rec�mmenda�tions : ; The staf� recommends den�i.al for the follo�?virig rEas�ns; � # � �,. 1 . One free--standing sign already exists on th� site � and is of greater s�z� than a�.lowed by the code. E „ I �.� A ` �. " 'M I NUTE S c� �.H ' * `'Tigard Planning Commission ' August 17, 1976 ��` Page 10 �' f. `�' . ,; 2. The site is oversi.gned and contains several illegal signs. ��' �,', �I 3. The intent oJ' the Tigard Community Plan would noi; �; be served if another sign is allowed. t� E, Rebu�ttal : ;I � o Nicoli indicated the need for a Muffler Shop, that the city should not have given the applicant a. business license if he could not advertize. ;?'I � i�, o Krause requested that the area be policed for �: superflu�us signs and that the proposed sign be �, smaller . o Phillips suggested that a long vertical sign be erected unde.r the existirig Lxxon sign. o Popp stated that a vertical sign could not be easily !' read by hi-speed tra:ffic . � F. Commission Discussion : �!:; ,, ��` o Sakata moved and Kra�ase secondecl that the proposal �-� be approved with th� following conditions : I . Design Review establish a smaller sign size. � la 2. Super�luous signs be taken down at the Sta.ff ' s t'� discretion . f:! ;'i �, The m�tian was approv�d by unanimotts voice v�te . ,; ;:. 7. OTHER BUSINESS �' �' �,; o Staf.f informed the Commission of tlze upcaming workshop on Ra August �lst and ,presented a workshop agenda. �� 3 o Popp asked that staff acquire a larger accomodations for the ��` gxoup. i`;' ,, �: o nvpp d.ir�cted the Commissions attention to a memo from Bruce � Clark, City Administrator, regarding the Highway 217 and 72nd �``' :i_ntersection . �{ 8. ADJOURMENT: 1� :30 P.M. f�' �:. a� �;' �r; `, �;i . �} �,. �:% q' .��' 'r �' ��" �YI Y STAFF REPORT �� Agenda 5, 1 ' Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M. Twalit;y Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-?5 REt�UEST: �eneral plan and program review of proposed 76 unit residential plan development . LOCATION: Canterbury Hill and SW 109th Avenue (Wash. Co. Ta:� Map 2S1 IOAD, tax lot 8800) . APPLICANT: Ken Bunn BASIC FACTS : l. . Tigard Community Plan designates this area a.s a transitionary area from "Residential-Commercial" to "Urban Low Dens�_�ty Residential" . 2. The Planning Commission on May 18, 1976, approved a pre- liminary plan and program �or this project with the �oll�w- �., ing conditions: � 1 . The amenities specified on the site plan be located on . the site plan submitted f.or general plan and px•o�ram review. 2. The method :�'or providing the right �� way and ,improve- i: ment af SW 109th be specified in the general plan . 3. The overall density be limited to 10.5 units per a.cxe. 4 . The proposed swimming pool anc� recreation bu,ildin� be moved to a location more inter.nal to the, development . FINI�INGS : l . Al1 the conditions attached to the preliminary approval have been incorp�rated in the �eneral plan. The full improvemen�t o� SW 109th at this time as px�,poseci shotxld absolve the applicant of participation in fu.rther improve- ments �or SW 109th Avenue to the south as that axea develops. 2. All trails and sidewalks shou].d terminate in wheElch�,i.r ramps to c�ty standards. 3. Parking in area.s other than those shown .for that pux,pose � would inhibit tYie �low of traffic and should be prahibited. 4. No provision for storm sewer is shown. �. .,..... , , _ . : . _ _._.. .... . ..._..�.__;_�. . ... _._ _ ,: . ; , , w � � �'; . �.� �k� STAFF REPORT Agenda 5.1 Ti.gard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 F�age 2 5 . The trails shc�wn are of two dif�erent types. The trail to the n�rth is to function as an alternative to a sidewalk and l.eading from the three lower buildings t� the recreation building and pool . These would probably be heavily used and would rieed to be blacktop of five foot in widl;h. The trail to the sotzth appears to be a recreation trail and could be develo�ed at a lesser standard. 6. Th� applicant is proposing to locate six (6) picnic tables off os the natural wooded arcas �..nd provide play- ground. 7. This paz•cel has not be�n �artitioned �rom the origin�.l �arcel . ThiU sh�uld be done priar to final approval by the Planning Diz�ectox. Also i�t sYxould be noted tha� therE is an il7.egal minor land pa.rtition on the portion of the lot �,,, that extends along SW l0�th Avenue to SW Murdock Stxeet . 8. The applicant proposes to dPCiicate a 30,000 square �oot area tar public park. On July 27, 1976, the pa�k �oard reviewed this pzoposal and. voted to preliminari].y accept this o:£f.er. Problems do ari.se as to the size, loca�tion, access, parking and futur.e use o� this p�.rk. area. If, in furtl�er considex•in� this reques�t, the park board decides that it is not in the best interes� of the City t� accept this into the city paxk system �o.r pu.blic naintenance, building seven a.nd e�_ght cot�]_d be spaced somewhat greater than shown an the site plan and the �tirail shown fln i;he site plan could o:r�iginate also :from SW 109t1�. AvenuP. 9 . The �Tniform Building Code require a rninimum 4 ' high safe�ty �ence around the peximeter of the pool . �` aw , P ♦ . �`� �,:M,;. � ... �'es_:::/ ; Staff Report Agenda 5. :� Tigarcl Planning Commission August 17, 1976 Page 3 CONCLUSIOPIARY FTNDINGS l . The apartment develapment at 10.5 units ta the acre conforms to the Tigard Community Pla.n. 2. The deviations from the Tigard Municipal Co�e are warranted in that large areas of trees are being maintained in a natura.l state and the site includes a swimming pool and recreation � building. � 3. The proposal is in harmony with the type of development th�.t � has c�ccurred on Canterbury Hill and fits we11 with the � clevelopment both to the north and to the east . 4. The ownership is proposed to be main�;ained ii� one single � ownership. This will assure the maintexiance of the open � space and amenities as depicted on the site plan and noted ! on the program, ' 5. The development of the parcel in tho� manner shown on the site ! plan will havE a beneficia.l ��fect on the area that would not � normally be achi�ved urider standard zoning. � 6 . The applicant has stated that the development can be initiated wi�thin ane year. 7. Z'he applicant has establishecl a puhlic need for a multi-family planned development on this site. � 8. The site is uniquely slzited for multi--family residential area � of the type depicted on the site developrnent plan. j 4 F � �: � ; � ; � � f . � � S' . . . . . . � . . � � - 1,� - . . . � . .. � � � �. . . .. . . ..� ��� � . �, .. . � � � . ���. � . . . � . . . . . . ... � ..�; � . P �1,1,,. t'.y;^. � ` '�� t;�:, � STAFF I�EPORT Agenda 5. 1 Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : 1. Storm and sanitary sewer system be approved by Engineering Department prior to submission to the City Council for general plan and program review. 2. That SW 109th Avenue be improved to ci�ty standards of 34 ' �avemenl; width on a 50 ' right of way from its existing end point to the intersection with the southerly loop drive �ntirely on the applicant ' s p.roperty and a 25' right-of-wa,y bP provided al.ong• �the rest of the parcel ' s wes� property line. 3. That a street plug be attacined along the west side of the SW 109ti1 Avenue right-ot-way until such �:ims as tlze rernainder of 109t1z (�.djacent this property) i5 develr�ped. � 4. The exis�ing stx•�eet plug at the end o� 109th b� vac,ated. 5. The area� along the loop drive not shown for parkirag spaces be signed to prahibit parking along that st2e��t . 6. A 15 ' wide easement for public sewers be established. � 7. All sidewalk and trails texminate in wheelchair ramps . 8. Street lights to P.G.�. standards fo.r Engineering Depart- ment approval . 9. The trail shown in 1;he northern half of the development k�e 5 ' aspllalt paths and th� trail on the southexn porti�n be left natural with minimal improvements o:f crushed �ravel of three �o four inches of compacted bark. 10. A minimal of six picnic areas be establ.ished within the forested area; design and location subjECt �Lo a�proval by Planning Director. 11 . Application to rectify the partitioning prob7.ems be initiated prior to consideration o:f the Gene.ral Plan and Pxogxa.m by the City Council . � 12. Refuse containers be properly screened. �, _ _ __ _ _, . ,_ _. ,_.,_ . . ._ ,.._.:...._. _,� .�.:.. .. ._,.� . � f;, �.�. �... �ti. STAFF REPORT �;�y;. Agenda 5. 2 1�� Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 - 7. 30 P.M. Twality Junior High School - Lectuie Room ', 14E50 SW �J7th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: CU 23-76 RE�UES'P; To locate a 8, 500 square foot a }�rofessional office building in a C-3, General Commercial zone . LOCATION: 11652 S .W. Pacilic Highway (Wash . Co. Tax �ap 1S1 36CD tax lot 1400� APPLICAPIT: Anton Schulz/M & S Investmc�nt Company �.ASIC FACTS l . The site is designat�d "General Commercial" on the Tigard Community Plan ancl zoi�.ed "C-3, Genera]. Commercial" . 2. Section 18. 28 .020 ( 30) of the Tigard A7unicipal Co�ie allows a pralessional or commexcial a��Cice builc�in� as a cand�_i;iorial use in t;h� C-3 zone. FINDIIVGS : r 1, . Th.e applicant is requesting a conditional use permit i:o locate a 8500 square foot professional oifice building behind the existing trophy shop at 11652 SW Pacific Hi�hway. 2 . The surrounding land use is a, bowling a.11ey to th� soutYi and automobile repair shop on the riortla and the Cr,ystal Springs Drainage Way to tlze east. 3. The site is below grade �f SW P�,cific Highwa.y and slopes back to the dr�inage way. 4 . (?f the permitted uses in the C-3 zone a pxofessional otfa,ce build.ing is a 1ow traf�ic generator. 5 . Access to the proposed building is programmed to be pri- mara.ly ac;ross t17e adjacen�t ].ot (sa:me owxrer) via an acc�ss ' �� easem�nt . ±' ; 6. Landscapin� in addi�tion to that which pr�sentl.y exists is ; shown on the site plan. This wi].l �.mprove the visual i�npact � of SW Pacific Hi�hway at this sit�. , � � 7. The construction of this buildin�; does not block an,y pro�osed � extension �f SW Pfa:ffle RQad into the tri�tingle. � ( � tl 2 � iI . . � . . � . . ���..i� . . . � . . � . � . . . � .. ..� . � � . . � . . � . . . � .. . � '. � ��. .�,..:.�.... . ..... . . . . . . . .. . :. .�. .;..,, ;_..:.�,.,... .....�:.�_ ... .� .... ... . . . . ... . . ._ .. -_ ��.�o�s , � � � ��; x ,.Y STAFF REPORT Agenda 5.2 ' Tigard Planning Gommissinn August 17, 1976 Page 2 CONCLUSTONARY FINDINGS : l . Adequa�te public facili•ties exist to serve the proposed use. 'I, 2. The Tigard Municipal Code requirements for parking, setbacks and lanciscaping is being provided� 3. The proposed use appears to be compatible with the surrolirzd- ing :Land uses. 4. The proposed izse conForms to t?�� Ti.gara Community Plan . 5. There is a public a�eed �Foz parc�_;'.s alon� SW �?a�ific IIighway tc� develop witl� low traffic generatars. �� � f � � � �`;; � � , � � ; - ,r..„.. :;„�.. �� „ � �., ,,� ; .� � '; �,` , ��F a ��;;;� STAFF' REPQRT � ,,..: Agenda 5.2 � Tigard Planning Commission �� August 17, 1976 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: App.roval �.s subrriitted with a signing progra.m for entire parcel submitted to Desi�n Review Boa.rd. � a nt�” I � I ` t - i :<.1 � _ , , � , ., .;,— ,:. ,..��- � _ _ _ �� ,R � i �' �� I[ i% i' �= S^tAFF REPORT �' �;; Agenda 5.4 �� Tigard Planning Commission E,j August 17, 1976 ;;; �'. (;, �,: DOCK�T: Variance V-7-76 f' �' �,E��UEST: Variance to the front yard landscaping and side yard setback in an "M-3, Light Industrial" zone. � i`� LOCATION: On SW Bonita Road west o� SW 72nd Avenue . (Wash. Co . Tax Map 1S2 12A, taY lot 1900) APPLICANT: National Safe�;y Company BASIG FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "General Industrial" on the Tigard Community Plan and :�onec� "�-3, I�ight Industrial" . 2. The site is pre�ently vacant with ov��grown native vegetation. � , - T 4C 3. Sectian 18 . 76.01.0 0� the Tigard Municipal Code ( 1� ) �; authorizes the d�lanning Commission to grant va.riances from the requirements o:f the zoning code "wh�re it n nusual �j �. c�,n be shown that , owing t.o special a d u '>,1 circums�;az�ces related to a specific piece of property, the literal. interpreta.tion o� this title would cause �?` ;.r an undue o.r unnecessa.ry liardslzip, except that no � va.riance shall be granted to a1.1.ow the use of propErty �� for purposes not authorized u�ithin the zone in which the proposed use would be located. In granting a ;! variance the planniz�g commission ma,y attach conditions which it _finds necessary to protect tlle best interests o:C the surroLtnding prc�perty or neiglzborh�od anc� to otherwi�e achieve the purposes of this titl.e. " 4 s�,;:i. 4. Sec�t:ion 18 . 76.030 of the Tt�IC states that "N� variance ` � shall be gr�,nted by tlle planning commission unless it ' i can be shown that all of. i;i1e lollawing conditions ;i EX7_St : ' j � ; (1.) r:�ceptional or extra�rdinary conditions appl,ying ; to the propErty that do not a�iply g�n�rally to otYier ��' properties in the same zone or vicii7ity, which conditions `'` axe a result of lot size or shape, topog.raph,y, or oth.ex ;` ci.rcumstances over which the applicant laas no control ; t,�: (2) The variance is necessary �or the preservation �,'. oi� a proper�ty �ight; of th8 applican�t substantially the ;:� same as is possessed by owners o:f other �roperty in � ; the same �c�ne or vicinity; `,'' �; ( 3) The ��?tl�c�xi.��.ti.on of the variance shall not be i,? materiall� dE�rimental to the p�urposes of this titl.e, �':. be injurious to �roperty in the zone or vicinity in whi.ch i�,; the property is located, or be ' otherwis:e detrimental to �n �`'�, � ,.:.... „ .._ ;, ... . �� . � , . �..� � � r I ° STAFF REPORT ' Agenda 5 .4 Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 � ��;" Page 2 the objectives of any city development plan or policy; I (4) The variance requested is the minimum variance from the provisions and standards of this title which wi1]. alleviate the hardship. " � 5 . S�ction 18.58 .080 0� the TMC rsquirPS �i;hat the front 20 ' oF the front yard setback be landscaped and main- tained. FINDINGS: l . The applicant is requesting a var•iance to the Front yard landscaping requirements of the A4-3, Light IndustriaZ zone. �f 2. There is appro�imately 30,000 sq. �eet of buildable land on �he site. 3. The proposed 20,000 sq. f.eet building can be locatec� on the lot without the variance. 4 . The flaod plain elevation at this sit� is 140 ' mean s�a '� level . �.`;. STAFF RECOMNIENDaTION: To be ac�vised. r � '�� . �- . _ , _ .... ..... .._. .. . ,.... . �..., ,_._.��� - ,, ., -,�, -,- � �,.. �..� STAFF REPORT � Ag�enda 6 , 1 ;��, Ti�ard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M. Twality Junior High School - Lectuxe Rooin DOC.KET: Minor Land Partition MLP 6-76 RE�UEST: To partition a 6. 5 acre parcel into three lots in an M-3, � Light Industrial Zone LOCATION: The southwest corner of SW 72nd Avenue a.ncl SW Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, tax lot 19OQ) I APPLICAIJT: Wa.11iam Flett BAS IC I'ACTS: 1 . The site is designated "General Industrial" on the Tigard Comml�nity Plan and �aned "M-3, Libht Industrial" . 2 . Section 17.24.030 of the Tigard Muna_cipal Code (TMC) requires that partition:�ng be consistent with the Tigard Communi.tgr Plan (TCP) , 3. Section 18.48.030 of the TMC requires a minimum of 6,000 square feet with a min.i.mum 6C� ' lot width in an M-3 zone. �� 4. SW 72nd is desi nated an arterial and �IN Bonita is desi - � g nated a collector in Sectior� 18012.100 0� the TMC, 5 . Section 17.28.090 0� the Tigar�l Municipal C�de states, "TNhenever exi.sting streets adjacent to or within a tr.act ax�e of inad�quats wi.dth, additional right-�f-way �hall be pravided at �Lhe tims of subdivision. G. SW Bonita I�oa,d and SW ?�nd Avenue are presently 4D ' right-of-wa,y where as Section 17.28.040 requires a GO ' and 80' right-of--way respECtively. FINDINGS : l . The appla.cant is requesting to parti.tion a 6. 5 acre parcel int� 2.03, 1.9J and 2.42 (approximately) acre parcels, 2. Tl�e lot dimension requirements of Sectian 18,48.03� o� the TMC arE being satisfied by the proposed par�,il;ioning. 3. The existing right-of--way wi;dth for both SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road is inadequate. Ttie deciication o� 10 ' the entire len.gth of the parcel along SW Tionita Road �" and 20 ' thE entire len;gth of the parcel along SW 72nci � � AvemuP is necessa�y to satisfy the requirements a� the �,�, � � � � . . _;;: � , , ., , ,., ,. ., �, „ . . . . ., . _ , _ . . . , .,.� � . _. _ , .. ,. _ , .. ; � �;; � ��� �, �' :;.• ��# � STAFF REPORT �`' Agenda 6. 1 ��,�� Au�gust 17, 1976 s`, Page 2 �' �; TMC and traffic generation xesulting �rom development �: i°'; <�f this property. �:; �':, 4. SW Bonita Road and SW 72nd Avenue are in substandard a condition anci in need of full improvement iF thi.s area �, is �:o dEVelop in such a manner as envis�.on�d by the �� TCP and the TMC. i' , ; �:`i 5. The proposal , wi.th the necessary dedications and impr�ve- �.� ments as noted in f�.ndings #3 arid #4, c�nforms to the � i:� TCP; most natably policy #3, '`' !;'' "Developm�nt will coincide with the pxovision of �",! public streets, water and sewerage �acilities. t' T'hese facilit�.es sh�.11 be (A) cap;�ble of adequa�tely servin�g all intervening praperties as well as the �' p.r.oposed development and (B) designed to meet cit,y or county standard�. " �;' ;:' STAFF R�COn4NI�I`dDATION: � ,,; p7, To be advised during the public hearing. `� �,.: ` `i t� ti�.� i<iY �r4 #�, �;,. �::�: � . �•,�,�.: �:. r`j f'r G:; � �� � ���;i �y �c'r, il�t r.,, ;;'n �t . . . ' . . .!�'i: . . � . . . . r��•Y �t� . . . � � 4�>;. (.� k: � � . . � . . . � . .. .� 1?;j � . . � � � . � � � i°�-: . . . . . � . . ..�`t'; . . . � . � .. . �i � . . . . � . . �. .� .�;.�.'; . � � .. � . � . �. . � � .f�'�;'. . . _ . ...��e �.�'. . . . . . . .:��. .�.� . . . . � . � . � � .�� i � . � . . . � � � � . . . . � 4 .. . � . . � � � . � � ��:�}k�S � . . . . . � � � . �h_'! � � � . . � � .. � .. � . . �.� ,.....ti. L���..� .a.L� .�... ..�..., ..,..>_ ... _. , .. _�'1... .., ,..,.u. .. ,. � ,«,_. . ... ........ . v...,,..w,. .,.,...1._...0 w..,ru ..,...,Iw ..�.�..... ...,. �1.. , � .....�...... w.i.�_.....L . .. -V iti' a+kms. �l� STAFF REPORT W Agencia 6. 1 August 17, 1976 STAFF RECUMMENDATION: � Approval with the following conditions : 1 . Dedic;ata.on of 10 ' the entire length of the parcel. a:Long SW Bonita �,oad anci 20 ' the entire length o� th� parcel along SW '72na Avenue . } 2. An agreement to participate in a local improvem�nt district to im�r•ove �4V ?2nd Avenue to city arterial street staridards and SW Bonita Road °to ci�ty collector �. street standards be filed with the City Recorder. � �p 3. The legal dc�cum:ents required in conditi�ns one and two � be satisfied prior to recording af the partition. [ � � � �, �; �. �. � r. � � � � � � � � � � � � I � � , � i ( j y t i � � , _. ,. .. �. .; ;. „ , . . . _ ; , ,,. _ � ,_ . F.� : . : � , ' �., ' i;.. �:•� 1., ._,,;�„� .� f � � —_ — � .,., , . � ��i :W �m ac �^ ��� ' S7'AFF REPORT ,,, Agenda 7. 1 1,., Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 - ? : 30 P.M. � Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SCA 6-76 (Chevron Service) RE�UEST: Request �or a va.riance o:C Title 16 (Si�n ]ftegulations) to �; �ermit 56" x 45" double faced free standirig sign. b � APPLICAVT: Rasmussen Chevron Service '� G TIn • 11747 S.W. Pacific Hi hwa � I LOCA N. g Y � � BASIC FACTS : k � 1 . The site is zonPd C-3 (General Comme:rcial) �� 2. Tigard Cornmunit;y Plan asks �that high desi�n standa,rds for ;j signing an�i appearance be establishc�d. �� i, 3. Sectiorx 16. 36 .040 - 3a "Oiie multifa.ced free-standing sign. . . �; shall be permitted on a street or highway �rontage. Wher� �� a franta�e exceeds three huncir�d :feet ii1 length, one b: additional free-standing sign is permitted !'or such front-- ' age. " 4. 16.08 . 130 "Free-standi_ng sign" means a sign e.rected and mounted on a .face-standing frame, mast , or pole and. not attached tU any building. ,r (r` FZNDINGS : � � [' �: l . The al�pli.can�t is .requesting to erect an additional double `` faced f.r.ee-standing advertising sign (56" x 45") . �; 2. Existing Signs: � u 0 1 - 10 ' x 12 ' a°evo_lving, double :L�:ced, free-sta.nd�ing � sign approxzmai;ely 35-40 ' high . s, t i � 2 - small accessory signs � � 3. The site has 200 ' oi Trontage along Pacific Highway. � � � } 4e The intent o:f the Tigard Community Plan to impxove tlae E visual environment along SW Pacifi.c Highway is not being � complied with by rel�.xing the sign code. � 5. No hardship is being cxeated by not grantin� the variance. �, � , 6 . There are no unic�ue physical .features that warrant granting � t�j_S t�aria.�c;P . _ t � � ; .. � �_ �. �gen�a�'lPI RT Ti�ard Planning Commission. August 17, 1976 - 7: 30 PM Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To be advised. I � �,,�,. �- � ..,. _ �� , � �. �;, �TAFF REFORT Agenda "l.2 = Tigard Plannir�g Commission �� August :L7, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M. Twality Junior High Sc:hool - Lectuxe Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon UOCKET: SCA 7-?6 RERUEST: For a variance of Title 16 Sign Code APPLICANT: Tigard Pduffler - Mr . James Page LOCATION: 13970 S.W. Pacific Highway (corner of McDonald and S .W. Pacific) BAS I C FAC;TS : . 1 . The site is zoned C-3 (General Commercial ) 2. The Tigard Communit,y Plan states that the pol.icy along Paci:fic Highway should be to "establish high design standards for signing and appearance. . . " ' 3. 16 . 36. 040 - 3a "One multi-faced free si;anding si.gn. . . shall be permitted on a street or highway frontage. " 4� 16.36.040 3c - "The maximum permitted area oF a free �r standi,ng sign shall be computed on 1 ' sq. feet of are�. per ].ineal foot of st.reet or high��ay fror�tage, plus 1 ' sq. foot of area for each �oot of frontage over on� hundred feet . . . " FINDINGS : � l . The applicant , Tigard Muffler, is pr�posing to �rec�t one f.ree standing sign 4 ' � 8 ' . Tigard blu�.fler is sharing buildind space with an Exxon gas station. �xxon has used al�. the alloted sign space for S.W. Pacific. 2. The intent of th.e Ti�ard Cor�munity P1an to impr�ve tYze visual environment along S.W. Pacific Higk�way would not be complied with by relaxing� the sign code. 3. Existing signs on thP site: o Free standing:5 ' x 3' double faced free standing sign on Mcvonalcl Street - approxi.mately 5 ' high. 0 12 " x 8 ' double faced, �re� standing sign on SW Pacific, �,pproximately 30' high. o Incidental sxgn: 3 - small signs advert�sing BAC �` 0 4 - sma].1 signs advertisin mini �nd sElf s�r g ve islands 0 3 ' x 2. 5' sign advertising prices 0 4 ' x 4 � ��A�� �rame ; �, _ . ,,.. . . .,,,.;,� ,.,,.:..> ,.. ...,..._.__... �.. ; _ I ... ...::: .. .. .. :� .. ,._ ..,.,.. .,..�.. , . ,_ ..._,�,� ,,._,�.� . �..,..,.. _�.. _.�, ....�., w�_ ... ��i -,...__.... ., ,.. ,,: . . . ..: ,a .�:, ��': �,., � w, r �„ ; ,., *�w h. S'1'A]Fr� REPORT fi� Agenda 7.2 � Tigard Pl,anning Commission ' ;;: August 17, 1976 �. Page 2 �i� Y, U i"cii o Wa11 Sign: 2 - 4' x 8 ' wall sign advertising Tigard �:' Muffler '=;: 0 2 x 8' - �wall sign advertising Fxxon C' o numerous �banners and posters �,,;, �,: 4 . Frontage on S.W. Pacific is 130 ' , according to 16. 36 .040 - �,A 3c this would allow 180 sql�.are feet for a free standing , sign, the existii� si n is xou hl 192 s uare feet . �' g g g Y q !°,i �'� �! �" r.' ,.� � ';� I':!; �': , �� �; �: �::: � � � }; � €; � �� �. � � � � t i �: � :, �..,. . � .. :.. . ,:. ... � : .... . . . ..,...,..�....0 �� w. �? ��.. �"�Y.,t��.. l ,�.-� STAFF REPORT � Agencia 7.2 Tigard Planning Commission August 17, 1976 S7.'AFF �ZECOMMENVI�T ION: The staff recommends denial for the �ollowing reasons : l . One :Fx�ee-st�.nding sign alr�ady exists on the site anc� is of grea.ter size than allowed by the code. 2. The site is oversigned and contains several illegal signs . 3. The intent af the Tigard Commu.nity Plan would not be served if anothex sigm is allowec�. �,. � _ _ a