Planning Commission Packet - 07/01/1975 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
.. _„_. .... ... , ,,._,. _. �_�, 3 ...,�.. ....u,. , M_. ._,,. _ . ._.�..._ . ,_ __ . _. ..z._._..� .,..�... ,,.� . . _ . ,..,_ _.,;te_
�� �
VG'�� ,
,, , �
.a �.
A.genda ,
Ta.gard £'lanning Commission
"� July 1, 1975 : - _
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 S: W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
l
1. CALL T0 ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4. COMMUNICATIONS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 Zone Change ZC 6-75 (Younger & Neu)
A request for an amendment to the Tigard Zoning Map from
R-7, Single Family Residential, designation to A-2, Multi--
Fami.ly Residential, designation for a 9.05 acre parcel
located west of SW Hall Boulevard, 600 ft. north of Pfaffle.
A. Staff Report
� B. Fublic Testimony
C. Staff Recommendation
D. Commission Discussion and Action
5.2 Con.d.itional Use CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco/Ck�arles Dunn)
A request to allow a car washing maehine at the Texaco
station at 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax map 2Sl 36AD, ta;x
1.ot 58000. This matter continued from June 17, 1975.
�1. Staff Report
B. Public Testimony
C. Staff Recommendation
v. Commission Discussion �nd Act�on
5.3 CQ:nditional Use CU 13-75 (Nine-T-Nine Towing Service/
Gene Dooley)
A request to allow placing ar� automobile storage area behind
the building presently housing the Tigard Libra�y on SW
Main St. (tax map 2S1 2AG, tax 1ot 7�101) . Continued from
June 17, 1975• -
1
�
,
�,
5.4 Conditional_ Use CU 14-75 ('�CT Supp�y Co. )
�� A request to al�nw a retail auto parts store on a C-3M
' zoned site located at 12200 SW Main St. (farmer Haney
Magnavox store) .
A. Staff Report
B. ' Public Testimony
C. Staff Recommendation
D� Commission Discussion and Action
6. SUBDIVISIONS
6.1 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 3-75 (Leron Heights #3/ J. A.
Paterson)
A request to a1.1ow partitioning of a part of tax lot 600
in the NE 1/4 of section 12 of Township 2S, Range 1 West,
W. M. , located approximately 400' west of SW 72nd on SW '
Landmark Lane.
A. Staf�' Report and Recommendation
B. Applicant's Presentation
C. Commission Discussion and Action
7. �IGN CODE APPEAL SCA 1-75 (Lincoln Properties)
( A request for an Pxtension of a 90 day permit for an over-
`�- sized real estate sign located adjacent th� Beaver�ton-Tigard
expressway.
A. Staff Report & Recommendation
B. Applicantfs Presentation
C. Commission Discussion and Action
8. OTHER BUSINESS
�
9. ADJOURNMENT
�
_
�.
Agenda PC = July 1, 1975 - page 2
,
, .
MINUTES
Tigard Planning Commission
� `; July 1, 1975
Twality Junior High School. - Lecture Room
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER.: Meeting was called �to order by Vice-Chairman
Por•ter at 7:35 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: Members present: Ball, Nicoli, Porter, Sakata,
Smelser and Wakem; staff, Powell
o Chairman Hartman attended the first portion of the
meeting, but declined to participate as a Com-
mission member due to a conflict he had which would
require his early departure.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minute� of June 1.7, 1975, were not yet
available.
4. COMMUNZCATIONS; None
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.2 Conditional Use CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco/Charles Dunn)
� A request to allow a car washing machine at the Texaco
, Station at �1465 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax map 2S1 36AD, tax
lot 5800� . This matter contin.ued from June 17, 1975.
` A. Public Testimony (continued)
�
o Mr. Dunn produced a landsca�e p].an showing restoration
of the site screening fence removed by the adjacent
' developer and indicated it was his understanding that
the developer would replace �;he fence after the con-
struction was completed.
B. Staff Recommendation:
Approval subject to applicant' s re-establishing ground
cover to tlze rear of his site and abatement of the
existing non-conforming signs and trash storage on
his site.
C. Commission Discussion and Action
o Commission discussed further, the noise problem
they had forseen in their earlier consideration
of this item. They discussed the necessity of
further landscaping as we11 as the desirability
� of limiting�':the operation to particular hours of
operation.
,, ., .. . .., ,.. . . , , . . . �i . . .. �. , . . ,. . i., ,., -.. . , . ,. _
. + . . Y �4�� l .
o Mo�tinn to approve (Ball) based on the conditi,ons
th�at:
�'��,i��:
1. AppJ..ication be submitted to Design Review
Board for review of the traffic flows on
the site.
2. ThE hours of opera�:��i.on be �.imited to from
8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. , based on the findings
that s�� conditioned the project would not
o it would
have adverse effects on the c mmun ,
Y
conform to the Ti�ard Comprehensive ���an
and would fulfill a cornmunity need for° the
proposed use.
o Seaonded (N9.coli)
o Motion carried unan.imous�y.
i
i
5.1 Zone Change ZC 6-75 (Younger & Neu) i
3
A request for an amendment to the Tigard Zoning Map from �
R-7, Single Family Residential, to A-2, Multi-Family Resi- �
dentia�., for a 9.05 acre parcel located west of SW Hall �
Blvd. , 600 ft. north of Pfaffle. �
A. Staff Report �
i
F
j Staff report was read by Powe�l. Additional graphic
`�•� ' materials were explained.
B. Public Testimony
o Neither the app�.icant nor his representatives �
�ppeared. �
� �:I
o No one appeared in favor. �
r:
o Opposed: Property Owner, SW Hall Blvd. ;
Lee Miller, SW Spruce St. �� �
W. A. Earls, 11185 SW Hal.l Bl.vd.
Property Owner, 11165 SW Ha11 Blvd. ;
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Widinger, 8850 SW Thorn j
John Pickitt, address unknown. �
All the above appeared in opposition to the pro- �
posed amendment. ;
,
C. Staff Recommendation
Not given. I
;
,
,
D. Commission Discussion and Action
a
�'' o Motion to deny (Ball) based on findings that no �
PC Minutes - 7/l,/75 - page 2
` p 3
corroborative testimony had been offered by
applicant and the impact on the neighborhood
� appeared great.
o Seconded (Wakem)
o Motion carried unanimously.
5.3 Conditional Use CU 13-75 (Nin.e-T-Nine Towing Service/
Gene Dooley)
A request to allow placing an automobile s�orage area behind
the building presently housing the Tigard Library on SW
Main St. (tax znap 2S1 2AC, tax lot �10�) . (Continued from
June 17, 1975) .
o Sakata excused herself from this item, declaring she
had a conflict of interest.
A. Staf� Report
Read by Powell.
B. Pub�.ic Hearing
o Mr. C�arles McClure, attoryney for the applicant,
testified as to the service Mr. Dooley performs
for the community, the insignificant impact of
�, the proposed project and the lack of adequate
altern.ative sights.
.
C. Staff Recommendation
o A roval on conditians that:
i PP �
', 1. A redwood slat, 8 ft. cyclone fence be pro-
vided as shown around the storage compound.
2. .� paved driveway approach be provided and
sufficient space between the building and the
enclosed storage remain to a11ow future park-
ing. '
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Ball asked about interference of the fencE with
flood plain,
o Staff responded that they fe�t the fence would not
interfere with the passage o�. flood waters.
o Nico�i said he thought the driveway approach was
ok without paving.
� ` o Motion to approve {Nicoli) .` :
PC Minutes - 7/�/75 - page ��
* • � ��S r�..
o Ball asked Nicol�. if he would amend his motion to
put a two year time restriction on the conditional
�, ,. use with a Planning Commission review to be held
at the end of that period of time.
o Nicoli said he was agreeable to the amendment.
o Seconded (Ball) .
o Wakem said that he felt this conditional use was
not within the intent of the N.P.O. #1 Plan, as
adopted by the City Council as part of the Com-
prehensive Plan, and he felt the policy statement,
which spoke to the need to improve the Main St.
business area, was violated by this action.
o Question called by Nicoli.
o Motion failed 3-2 (Wakem, Smelser, Hansen v�ting
against) .
o Chairman Porter indicated that he felt unconvinced
of the adverse impact of the project.
o Mr. McClure told the Commission that he felt that
Hansen should have disqualified himself in the
voting and as.ked if the Commission would reconsider
� : its vote.
o Porter indicated that disqualification, in fairness,
is a matter up to the individual Commission member
and that the question had been defeated.
5.4 Conditional Use CU 14-75 (TCT Supply Co. )
A request to allow a retail auto parts store on a C-3M
zoned site located at 12200 SW Main St. (formerly Haney
Magnavox) .
A. Staff Report
Read by Powell
B. Public Testimony
o Alan Holcombe appeared for poug Martel, the appli-
cant, and spoke in support of the project and
addressed the required conformance questions
a�ter ��Fasano��.
C. Staff Recommendation
� Staff rPCOmmended approval subject to provis:i.on of
additional landscaping on the sidev� lines and in
front of the building. R�' ��,
,
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 4
� � �"�'�� �` �
�
'}�
D. Cornmission Discussion and Action
�' - o Motion f'or app�^oval (Ball) per sta�f recommendations.
o Seconded (Wakem) .
o Motion carried unanimously.
6. SUI3DIVISIONS
� 6.1 NLLP 4-75 (Sabre Construction Co./S. W. Landmark Lane)
An application to al�ow the partitioning of a part o_f tax
lot 600, NE 1/4 of section l2, Township 2S, Range l West,
W. M. , located at the end of SW Landmark Lane, west of 72nd
Ave. (tax 1ot 600, tax map 25�. 12A) .
A. Staff Report
Read by Powell. Location of the pro�osed partitioning
pointed out on display maps provided fox that purpose.
B. Public Testimony
o Mike McGee, Sabre Construction Co. , explained the
need for a minor land partitioning to accommodate
a new project.
� o No one spoke in opposition.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval on condition that the remaining conditions
of Landmark Lane major land partition be satisfied.
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Motion to approve (Hansen) subject to staff
recommendation.
o Seconded (Smelser) . '
o Motion carried unanimously.
7. SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 1-75 {Lincoln Properties)
A request for an extension of a 90 day permit for an oversized
rea� estate sign located adjacent the Beaverton-Tigard Expressway.
A. Staff Report
Staff report, with reeommendations for approval for
an additional 90 days, on condition that th� appropri-
ate permit is obtain.ed for the site; that total. sign
��:
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 5
�
� -
r'��``> �.
£
� ��'
area is not to exceed 32 ft. and that sign is to
� be relocated so as not to constitute a hazard to
motorists, read by Powell.
B. Public Testimony
No one appeared.
C. Commission Discussion and Action
o General discussion of the appropriateness of the
sign as presently located ensued.
o Moti�n to approve subject to staff recommendations
(Hansen) .
o Seconded (Smelser) .
a Motion carried unanimously.
8, OTHER BUSINESS �
o Commissioner Ball brought up the topics of recent legal
cases in -the area of land use 1aw, citing specifically
Baker vs. Milwaukie. Ba11 asked the Commission to re-
quest a discussion by the new City Attorne,y of these
cases before the Commission.
�- o Porter poin.ted out that there were a number of unresolved
issues previously attempted by the P7.anning Commission
over which they had asked some time ago �o . cor��erC'with
the City Council in order to discuss the particular
policies germaine to the issues involved.
o Wakem pointed out that it may be va�.uable to orient the
Council to the Planning Commission's thinki�;g with i
respect to planning and that such a meeting would be �
necessary in order to establish rational priorities i
for future legislative matters. An example cited was �
that of outdoor advertising signs and the amendment �
of the Sign Code. �
o Sakata asked that the staff address the issue of zoning �
code enforcement. She stated that she personally had �
noticed, and it had been frequent�y brought to her I
attention, that conditions applied by the Planning �
Commission to conditional uses were not being adhered j
to and that other zoning code violations were becoming t
commonplace. i
�
o It was suggested that revoc�tion of conditional. uses is
a Planming Commission power and that a check list of
conditional uses and their conditions should be estab-
� lished for a vigorous enforcement program.
g. ADJOURNMENT: 10;50 p.m.
I
PC Minutes - 7��-�75 - page 6
�
��, �.,
NOTTC� QF PUBLIC I�iEEARINC
CTZ'Y 4F TI�A,Rp PLANNZl�G COMMIS5T4N
No�ice is hereb� �iven tha� publie heariz�g� will be held by the
Pla�nin,� Cammi�siox� of the Cityr o� Tigard in �.�' Twa�ity J�i�or
�Iigh School Lectur� Room, 14650 sVZ 97th Avenue, Tigarc�, nregon.
�a�i�d h�ar:ings �ill occur on Ju1y l, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. arid wi11
concern the follow�ng'z
* �1n app�.�catic�n by TCT Supply Co., far a cor�ditional
use permit to Qatablish a retai�. autn parts �tore -
on a C-�3M zoned si�e lvcated at X22�00 SW Ma�n St.
(tax map 251 2AA, tax lot 2302).
� An appli�ation by Youn�er and Neu for a ,zone change
from Ft-7 to A-2 of a 9.45 acre percel located west
' of �C� Hall B�.vd. , 60� ft. nQrth o,� Pfaffle. (Tax map
1.�1 35AD, tr�x lot� 2402 anri 2500; tax
map 15�. 3�DA, tax 1.o�s 1600 and 1?00) .
A11 persons ha.ving an interest in these matters are invited to attend
and be hear3.
I
�
, (
�
Pub�ish TT June 2S► 1975
� �� � � � �� � ����
j
. � I
.'\
STAFF REPORT
Tigard Planning Commission �
� ��
July l, 1975 �
Agenda Ttem 5.1 _ I
�
ZC 6-75 (Younger & Neu) ;
I
i
Zone Chan�e �
i
A request for a zone change (amendment of the zoning map) '
for a 9.05 acre parcel located west o� SW Ha7.�. Blvd. and �
600 ft. north of Pfaf�le (tax map 1S1 35AD, tax lots 2402 and
2500; tax map 1S1 35DA, tax lots 1600 and 170Q, including !
parts of SW 89th Ave. , SW Manzanita and SW North Dakota and i
a .21 acre parcel to the south of SW North Dakota) . '
S-Laff Findings ' ;
�
l. The parcel of �and adjacent to SW Ha�l Blvd. and the parcel ;
south of the center line of SW North Dakota St. are not in
the City of Tigard and are subject to the zoning laws of
Washington County.
2. The applicant is presently attempting to obtain vacation
of the portions of those streets within the City of Tigard
that are also within the tract of land described. None are
improved streets.
��.
3. The north access to the site acro;�s Ash Creek crosses a
flood plain area. Development of an access through to
89th along the existing street would be difficult even if
the impact of the additional traffic on the neighborhood
north of Ash Creek could be shown to be acceptable.
4. According to the Washington County zoning dept. , access �I
thraugh a single family zoned site to an apartment site j
: could only be obtained by means of a st.reet dedication. ,I
5. The applicant's stated proposal is for 109 dwelling units. �'
Tigard zoning code will allov�r a maximum of 1 dwelling unit
per 3630 sq. ft. , not including dedicated streets or ease-
ments. Since the area of the site is undetermined at the
moment, the number of units possible cannot be exact]_y
determined.
6. In the absence of a site plan, staff cannot determine at
this time how far a dedicated road ought to extend into
the site, although past experience i�.dicates that either a
cul-de-sac or � loop drive will be'n.ecessary in order to
provid�,-sufi'icient aecess� for fire anel emergency vchicles.
Such a loop or cul-de-sac must be a dedicated public right-
of-way in order to provide legal authority for enforcement
� of traffic regulations.
, , . ��., �,.
7. An additional problem forseen by staff is that under Tigard
Code a p�.rcel of ground (a lot) must be physical�y 'built
�� upon in order to exercise i-ts inherent development right
under the zoni.ng code. The separate parcels iden-tifi,ed in
� the application must therefore be assembled into one "lot"
before deve�.opment of apartments, unless the appropriate
number of units are built separately on each of the lots
lega�,ly described. That is, a trans�er of development
rights from one lot to another cannot be done by a zone
change.
8. The Ti�ard Communit_y Plan identifies this area as resi-
dential-commercial.
9. Present land use in the area is single fami�y residential.
10. Hall Blvd. (formerly Hwy. 217, a state highway) is desig-
nated a major arterial in the Ti�ard Communitv Plan and
is likely to be improved to r,ommercial street standards in
the future.
11. The flood plain of Ash Creek, running east-west across
the northerly part of the site is designated "greenway"
in the Tigard Community Plan.
12. The attached responses to the Fasano related question.s
deal with demand factors and community impact.
�� Staff Recommendation
to be advised after close of public hearing
�
�
:
PC Staff Report - Ju�y �., 1975 - i-�em 5.3. - �age 2
I
i
�.-,.,� , _
, _ _ . _._ ,_ ,,_ . . . _
� .._ _
,. � ;..
� ._
�.� �_.����
�. - . .I. . ; i
�� .
� . ,
;
. ' ; � i ,. __ , —� ' �
. d , M �
/ • � '� . � �— I _
` �' 1
� -- _________ � . �
. �
. � s w.sPx�r s�r �
. -
. ' . %�OO -- ��� -- �pso � i�o y,zoo zso! , �1
Zm�O . ' h ' , • i
� zv �
. � • '7at ' . �
I ��7�s. Y � �'
���� � 2Jo zNal ' �
tA _ �
� � •' 4 ��0 , . ' �
t4O� N ' P
I , c ZyoO ( . 1
l � x� i��. � �
* .
� � � . • 2V0� � � �
� � z� :{?G�.E�4�,+.�`�� - � _ �!
�\ , �'� �7�f ,� 2300 � �
njP ' ` ' �
� ,
i x�oi uo2 ST zz QD � -
UAKQ A + ' '
zroz� �.� �oo f
I y y � ` � z000 � .
� � � � .
.,
`O . ,f�, • ,,o• � s4, P!"�FFG6 sr. '`,
�, a ,-
�
z �o � _� , �'
N
lp 6 � � :i 1 i;�
y ....� 1 }:
: . w �. ' ' \ � 4:
. 1 ' �
• ��` r.
. n � ' � . � .. .j� � � �M �.� • � .�•^ '��
.� m� p � ., t'1' '�" _� � � .. `'�. ���a•. • {,
f � � � J � �Y
C
J r �
,':
- �
sw �;
.�v ' . N ' �
• �
' i ^ . <--- � . \� .� �
. � • ' \ ' � . �
� �� ��c:11U l r"f..-��f.�-�, � . : . '
� . ,. -_ ._ . . �
_ � � .° . �
._. � ;
� . . . .
� W � �.�a,
� �g ' � a� - : -3000
s�°i 21 IGf.M�tS0f31 �a �500 w:P �t�i i� ���:t �s 2 '� E • �J. � , � .
x ` 2000 �
a ,
' 2 1:�` !'�� � 'i : 2300 23Ci — _
,\ ; 3e Y ; -r 4 -G'—J s ����� ���i1 : ° _ _ � ,�, ' �
. \ r : �,r I � _ ..� •� , sioo
� �ee.r r��.�• • 2403 Zq = �
0 N� � �'
�' TH R ST ; ,.,.• , -----� ---- Z.00 . �
,\ �' s �
.� , �
� , 37 ,o,' ���r iti.r ».��r i��. 1702 . - r, ' I f�
� ����� _ 1705 17� 1701 ; 2404 ° • �
���. 1 � � ,�_.�..,��.�,
'� ,� �:� � �r: : �=o:, ,,, �� —
�. �6N0 36 !I = I703 _ f 8� _- 7 .x +i�02 � 2esi '
'W145NIrt tpA/ O� ° I• T� � I _r•�,.., wl �j � .y�_ c� .e .eq . O
e� • u�� . ,� G"� `= �� �. ,, .� I ` Y560 3,'.
' i6pp I t oF ,T. � ,.,, ,.�. 1 6 ..
,�,: � -�._ noo ,.�. � I I ..
.{ ,� _"�',�.-;= a.;;..� � � _ l N
} � � I�ca w oon�,. �.����.��: y:�; � r �, '
� � .�..._�.4+ . . ,.3:, . . ,;�: t�._.__
C ,,� a,,_ z .r - .) - �)� ¢ ,. V-----.._ � ,� .`.r,.�;,,�: �- '� � � ��
h►� � a� �� i1 u,�-��a �.�:i���s�F - r �s� '' � � � `�----
Q�Q � ' -� !"_ /" x � 10 .-��:.+� I�. "�xx�"kl l"'t�+!° �.€r�� a l i �a �.��{CO `'�
:. � .,'�+�.'^`N S. �
�� 'lO jj�• x€�°,�+r-�'� { :��^j� i �{ �K .,r���ma t...,��� ...,�� � , �r� � .,'• .
_ I yr& ;�"a,� r�.:" ..+ �
�f1 � 1[l�{� �''�'l�Y���"��'p' W •l�i.��`Mt1••:aa' �.'"�1"�raii.a�:�r„�r a1�L�''4'.. .i► I M�..
` L . �C r � � � s - ...� w � Nt► . . . �� ... .
7[( NM��e �•l�
Z �' a -�-".su•• � ._�-.i�r� dr�r�••—�-rr. �`����5==' — — = I �:
� �/ ` . ...-�,,,. ... � � . � •• .
� / �ii'�_. �. +�-r,a�''�'+� c�.r, .- *...ra, . � . . '_ � ( i, .
��� v� � � ;r:� �- ",.. . �OI
��r .2�500 �. � ,. L ,� .
f �, � ,�� -m . �
( I �s�.o?swi�T"�'..'" �i'-= _' ' ''*. y�!��j j�] J��� ;..�.« ,� ... t R
SEE �P � , f � �M -'�G a. � �''c�R,-re�^.7a0rSt� ';�1J��.JJ']!YJ ��`�3�?r,�y � stSS , . : B
� YI !� G� I� ry3 +� ,-i � _ t' r� .•� - �.=��sYie���' ,J� �/0°2 •.�q � �
. ' .,, :`� �w�.-C..� P`
.F` � � w� � �x P ��l.' � �'�,��.r`!`�i�''� "r���r'. I I�_�� ,:� 'o � e Y0� J
. 30 27 26 2� ^: .r�l'Y,�. 16 �� I •o�•st• � �w
3tl0
b ww a� w� �n �°f"� ki �ti � y ui �••."�u �;,:tr.�� . R
2603 2601 2602 -
. \ � � � ���� .
. — 0 I �r 1 ' -�,-�,� .�� 1 ..:�, ' - 300
�c 0
� � .�y � Y � �. �� eI / 2 ` ,pt"��' , :�( ':y S 1�����.� °
; . - - W - � � � _ ,, �n .;� _ � �,.�.�,,�.,;( �p - ��C.
_ � lc 3,.` " �'"'" �,a.c��' 'z .e - �P
29 20 2 �e o 23'�� 22 I 1� ' l:� i5 ��+ 14 . 2201 � � ';f 400
�e�.es r '� ; ae.n � � � �t� 1 * �,•rin-� �b � 7�'��1�7 �
- — x . �� . ,�„w.�.�
. . . .. �
. - � ...,...�.
i1 • .• G/T � IYEw stAe[Tt �` . + � 22 . Q " � � . . .
r .n•..t ,eo '— � . "� (��
Z
� �� 270 o e, X. � +!� �WrJ.G 1� � ' '`J
2 b•
R �*t g �}
� �
..•.. i �, ' II � .. �
o e !4 w
h - -
L ' Y'
� .ds�a ��•y ;�♦ �,.
S• 2T00 . t'�
� . �. • . .r� + - —'—' i F
. S .
ti
�
b g • �
y 1
sue . + 2 00
b•
+. 4 -
I . . �'s o � i� , � .
SEE MAP IS 1 35DD
tee
f 1
i . E A
� sn•s�• ; � �BLK �d ?
xTOi � _ — — M,.,_ — ,_� _ �
• - .Jlwc. �
. . X
,. � ' n.Ifn (� . I 2000 � •
. n � , �g R�
-f- c•r�.. reo _ � _�i� f
• = � ■���N�[ U4L 1 X �IO � y 1
� ��'� � \- . o � � 800 �
c N � . � �n y j.' ,Q. . .
� 2003 � 280t �� !� ��r }-
. � � 2e0� .ZY.Ae t 4UE/e , � or-' �_ .� .� .� . . (n � � � .
, � .eeee. � : ; � � ' 1900
� - ` '_..�.� i � _�
.. � M +� � �� /��j rwr � . � � �� L�,� � .
�i,� i 2502 � Y� J� .�!''C. .!� �n '� � �x�. _. _ _ ,�.
. �.
_-� --'-----.._.._.__�_�.�_____:,_._...e....;..__..,_-.....-----,._..._..._.�.r�.r ,"",--.�,...- ... .__.... _,,:.,.._ . , ':..._...._,_.__—.____�__-�
:..-=�- .�:,,.--_�.z.
, . ... . . ......... .. . . .. . . . ... . . .. .� �..:�I
��
. t
. +1 ' � �.. .I
Y � j::,
t
2'
�t.. '"..
� �
�
�y' �����•.
� . fleal Estate Appraisers and ConsultanYs
�
� m[t
�—�,�„-' '��
� ` F'�
YOUNGER ANd NEU • 1438 Georgia-Pacific Building • Portland,Oregon 97204 • 503/221•1061
� APPLICATION• FOR ZONING. MAP AMENDMENT
� RE: Lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 31, 32, 33, 34 & 35
GR��AM ACRES, City of Tigard, in Section 35, 1S, 1W,
Together with vacated poxtions of S. W. 89th, S. W. Manzanita, and S. W. Dakota
Streets
Also Tax Lot 2402, Section 35�, 1S, 1W, situated in Washington County, which will
serve as access for the above tax lots. �
Area
Including vacated streets, 9.05 acres +
�lpplicant
� 'Pollock and Grayson Investments
Current Zoning
;
4�
Residential `j
Proposed Zoning
A-2, apartment _
In'tent �
To allow construction of 109 low-rise, cluster apartment units with access provided by
Tax Lot 2402, situated in Washington County, to S. W. Hall IIoulevard.
1. Purpose for Proposed Zone Change .
To allow the ixnmediate construction of 109 apartment units in this expanding area between
Washington Square and .the center of Tigard.
2. Conformance with Tigard's Comprehensive P1an � I
k:;
The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tigard calls for residentia2-commercial usage on
the subject property. In discussions with Dick Bohlen, City of Tigard, it was stated
that apartment or apartment and office combination would fulfill the concept of the
� Comprehensive Plan. �;;�
s�i
Discussions with Washingkon County indicate that office development is desired to be - ;:�;?
kept closer to P�ashington Square than this site. Fur�her discussions and consideration r'''
k�
by the develogers indicate the market is most desirable and the propeXty best suited, �.r
considering access,for 109 ap�rtment units rather than a mixture of apartment and office y�`;j
use. This does Conform to the Comprehensive Plan. �
� _ __ . ..
, ` _ _
,0 4 �- ��. � .
3. Conununity Needs Met by the Project
� With the completion ot the Washington Square Shopping Center, tremendous impact and
grow�h is ant�.ai.pated in the area north, south, east, and west of this regional
shopping center. On� .of the prime areas of growth should be the area between
Washington Square and the existing center o£ the city of Tigard.
In the last year or two, very limited apartment construction has occurred because
of the unfavorable financing rates, and the rapid increase in building costs which
has made it uneconomical,considering rent levels,to construct new apartment projects
and have them be economically viable. ,
In the past y�ar plus, rents have increased to the point where it is now possible for
competent,large scale devel.opers to bui.ld under current financing conditions anc3
show a return Por tcheir ef�orts.
Due to the very limited number of new apartment complexes which have been builis in
the last two years, and due to the tremendous impact of Washington Square Shopping
Center on the subject property, there is a very limited number of apartment dwelling
units in the subject area.
The firm of Younger & Neu, oonsultants for Polloek and Grayson Investments, is
currently in the process of a comprehensi.ve rent/vacancy study in the immediate
area of the subject property on apartment. Units within fi�ve to ten blocks of the
: subject site, such as Washington Square Apartments, Shenandoah, Ash Creek Apartments,
and a limited number of other smaller duplex and fourplex projects, indicate very
few vacancies and a strong demand for additional units in the area.
�,LL
' Complete details of this rental survey will be presented during the formal application
hearing. Yt is evident at this writing, however, that there is a strong demand Por
additional apartments in the ar�ea and that the subject property is '�-�eally situa�ed
to satisfy this demand.
4. Chan�es and Conditions to Justify Proposed Zone Change
For the past three to five years, there has been a tremendous change in the environment
surrounding the subject property, the last major impact being the Washington Square
Shopping Center situated one-half mile north and west of the subject.
As a result of the location of the Washington Square Shopping Center, there is a great
impact on the area between the existing center of Tigard and the Washington Square
ceriter. Any shopping center of the scope of Washington Square will cause a tremendous
development for residential and business uses in and around the area of the shopping
center influence.
Obviously, the larger the shopping center, the larger the area of influence. The
Washington Square center indeed will affect all of West Portland and the most dramat3.c
effect will, of course, occur in the closest proximity to the shopping center.
W'hen coupled with the extreme scarcity ot available rental housing and apartment units
in the vicinity of the subject property, and the limited amount of additional new
housing projected to be completed during this period of recession and high intezest
� rates, the capability of the subject site housing comfortabl.y 109 Iow-rise apartment
dwellings becomes even more attractive. ,
-2-
�
� � ,. � � �.
� �: � .
With respect to the availability of utilities, the subject �roperty is served by
the Metzger Water District with a 4" line in 89th, which connects to an 8" line
� on Spruce, leading to Hall Boulevard. Tn addition, there is a 12" water line on
Hall Boulevard which, no doubt, would be used to service the subject facility.
Discussions with Mr. Lowman of the Metzger Water District indicate no problems in
servirg the subject site with adequate water needs. In addition, discussions were
held with the Unified Sewer Agency regarding the availability of sewer for the
subject site to service 109 apartment units. In thi's respect, it was discovered j
that there is a 10" sewer line on 89th Avenue extending southward to Thorn Street i
immediately north of the subject property.
In addition, there is another 10" sewer line situated on the northeasterly portions
of the subject property. From an analysis of the topography of the subject site,
there appears to be no problem either capacity-wise or with respect t� drainage in
terms af serving the subject site with sewe�
With respect to access, the subject site is sitauted some 260' west of S. W. Hall �
Boulevard. With the vacation af Manzanita Street and S. W. Dakota Street, and that
portion of S. W. 89th Avenue situated on the subject property. the only dedicated
right-of-way would be the end of S. W. 89th Avenue which abuts the subject p�operty
on the north towarcls the center portion of the property.
In addition, Tax Lat 2402, Section 35, 1S, 1W, is owned by the subject developers
and extends from the main portion of the subject property west connecting to S. W.
Hall Boulevard, with 74.75' of frontage on S. W. Hall. This 74.75' frontage is
•�.ntended to be the primary ingress and egress for the subject site, leading to
� �� S. W. Hall Boulevard, a major north-south arter•ial:
As a secondary access only, for minor traffic if necessary, S. W. 89th Avenue to
the north through Spruce,leads to Hall Boulevard as a secondary route. It is the
developer's intent, however, that the prime and possibly sole access to the subject
site can be adequately served from the 74.75' of frontage on S. W. Hall Boulevard.
i
After due consideration to access factors, it has been aoncluded by the developers
and this writer that the subject site, with its one major access on Hall Boulevard,
is better suited f.or apartment development th�n it would b� for office development
because of the extreme peak load nature of office traffic coming at 8:00 to 8:30 A.M.
and leaving at 5:00 to 5:30 P.M.
Apartment traffic also has a peak load factor for demand on arterial.s but not as
concentrated a peak as has office development. In summary, it has been concluded
�that by developing the 109 apartment unit� on the site, the best combination of
physical, environmental, and governmental impact would result.
5. Suitability of the Subject Site
The subject site is virtually all developable ground with tremendous exposure to
the Tigard-Beaverton expressway, with nearly 1,300' of frontage on the restxicted
access Beaverton-Tigard expressway. Local studies conducted by the firm of Yaunger
& Neu and national studies conducted by the Urban Land Institute and other economic
analysis firms, have indicated that exposure�and first appearance on the street are
� two of the major determinants in the success or any apartment or condominium project.
_g_
1�_- _ . __. _
i
I
I
�
� e.
r.. ' i .
. • ` . �• �' ` _ i .
With this in mind, the tremendous exposure of the subject sit� along the Beaverton-
x Tigard expressway lends it very favorably to apartment development. While havinq
��. this tremendous exposure on t'r►e Tigard-Beaverton expressway, the fact that the main
portion of the sub�ect sa.te situated' some 264' west of S. W. Hall Boulevard means ;
that the existing uses along Hall will be disrupted at a minimum.
;
The subject ownership c£Tax Lot 2402, which extends to Hall Boulevard, would be ;
used for accpss purposes and landsoaped to provide ai attractive entranceway into i
this 109 proposed apartment unit com�lex. The remaining frontage of other properties
along Hall would not be affected adversely by the subject development.
In discussions with City of Tigard o�ficials, it appears that the City of Tigard's
policy of improving the appearance of Tigard from the Beaverton-Tigard expressway
will also be met by the subject development. The low-rise campus-type apartment
� complex proposed by the developers will be very attractive from the expressway and
will positively complement the appearance of Tigard from the Beaverton-Tigard expressway.
The subject site is additionally more suitable than most other sites in the area •
between Tigard and Washington Square, which is a larg� area of growth for apartment
complexas, becaase of its definite proximity to the freeway, walking distance to
Safeway and other shopping in Tigard, and its size to accommodate the scale of
development needed in this period o£ recession and high interest rates, where small
builders are in fact fin�ing it uneconomic ta develop.
6. Effect of the�Proposed Development on the Existing Adjacent Properties and Neighborhood
:As mentioned earlier, the main visual impact ot the proposed development will be from
� the Beave�an-Tigard expressway and not £rom the. existing neighborhood along S. W. Hall
Boulevard. Only one 74.75' strip of property will front on Hall Boulevard and will
be used in the subject development. �
. . '
Further� the 109 apartment unit complex proposed by the developer will provide j
considerable screening of noise from the Beaverton-Tigard expressway to Meighbors to '
the north and east running along Hall, Thorn, and Spruce in tY�e immediate neighborhood
around the proposed development.
In terms of economic effect .on existing neighbors.� the consultants feel there wi11 be
virtually no adverse effect to abutting and adjacent neighbors to this proposed
apartment development, which will be very eye-appealing and will have a minimum of
noise, no high-rise structures, and in general, a minimum of disruptive influences ;
to ather residential uses.
As stated ea.rlier, there are other apartment projects, in fact several duplexes and
fourplexes immediately north and east of the subject property. These units are not
felt to be adverse influence to existing neighbors and the subject development, ;�
being situated off of Hall Boulevard with a minimum view from.Hal1, will be ev�n �` '?
less obvious from local traffic and existing residences and businesses situated
along Hall Boulevard. �`
�;
�.
7. Puhla.c Services Necessitated by Propased Development ��
,,,
.J l t'!
' The Metzger Water District indicates 12" water line is available to the subjeat ;�
property on HaZl Boulevard and the Unified Sewer Agency indicates two 10" lines are �;{
�` available to service the subject property. "'
(,`�
•�:�
,
(�t
-4- . �'y
. .. a. ;... ,:: . .. . ... .. ..: . _. .. ...... . _ _ .. .s. _� ......, _.. �. .�. .. ,.._ _ ., . _ . ,., .
.
_ ._ � ,.
� �� t �?�
� � � ` �::- �..,. � � �
Discussions with both of these agencies� indicate there is no problem servicing the
subject site with the capacities needed for 109 unit�, With respect to schools,
� obviously at this writing i.t is not knoum how many children will be situated in
�' the proposed developritent, depending on the final mix of one, two and/or three
bedroom units which results from the final conclusion by the developers 3ust prior
to �uilding. �
In discussions with Mr. Bob Greenwood of the Tigard scbool system, it was indicated
that elementary school is the Metzger' Elementary School for the subject development
and Fowler Junior High School for junior high students. Fowler Junior High has a
current enrollment of 710 with a current capacity of 800 and a possible capacity of
1,000. �
The Metzger Elementary School is approximately at capacity at this writing; however,
Mr. Greenwood was very enthusiastic about the proposed development and indicated that
additional students can be handled by modifying enrollment and redistributing the
enrollment at the various elementary schools in the area.
With respect to services by roads and arterials, it is felt that S. W. Fiall Boulevard
can very adequately handle any and al.l traffie needs increased by the subject
deveZopment. There is no doubt tha'� in the near future, S. W. Hall will need to be
widened, particularly as the area around �4ashington Square continues to grow and
develop.
The subject development is, indeed, a very minor impact when the total overall view
of the Washington Square Shopping Center ar_ea is focusPd on the traffic needs an
,S. W. 1Ha11 Boulevard.
��
In conclusion, the consultants and the developers are convinced��hat the � �
proposed 1.09 unit apartment developmen� will be very successful and be •a very
positive addition to the City of Tigard for the new growth which is inevitable and �
necessary in this Washington Square area.
Q
The developera look forward to imnediate construction on •this project prior to Winter �
and urqe approval of this proposed zone change at the earliest possible date. ;
1
Sincerely, � i
i
i
YOI� GER & NEU �
�
: ;
� j : � �� � ���ft � �
�C 1 � �
Ralph W. Younger �
Consultdnt for Pollock and Grayson. Investments, Developers �
,
I
v �
Attachments �
�
t
� ' ;
-5- _
, : ' _ __ �'
. �� �.�1�f:x�
r
STAFF REPORT
Tigard: Planning Commission
., July �., 1975
: Agenda Item 5.�
�
CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco Car Wash - Char�.es Dunn)
• i
:,
Conditional Use
for a portabTe car wash to be insta�.led at Colonial Texaco ;
(11465 SW Pacific Hwy. )
i
Staff Findings
1. This matter is continued from June 17, 1975.
2. Colonial Texaco was annexed to the City of Tigard in 1973
and was zoned C-3. A service station is ordinarily a
condition�,l use in a C-3 zone; however, an existing con-
ditional use subject to an annexation is annexed as a
permitted use: 1
�
3. Land use in the area is highway oriented commercial along
Paci.fic Hwy. , although a more '�urban arterial commercial�'
character is beginnizag to be evident. The lots behind
the Pacific Hwy. frontage support mixed single family
� homes and apartments which here seem to be compatibly '
arranged. A general impression is of a pleasant, well- ;
maintained, residential area. The site adjacent the ser-
vice station on the west is present�.y under construction
for two restaurants, "Shakey's Pizza" and "Country Kitchen��. '
4. The undeveloped area in the rear of �he site provides an
excellent buffer between the adjacent commercial and resi-
dential uses, but needs to be maintained. Provision of
some additional evergreen vegetation would he�p control
noise from the service station somewhat, but will not pro-
vi.de complete sound isolation.
5. The sight obscuring fencing formerly located near the
property line adjacent "Shakey' s'' has been taken down,
apparently by the owner of the Shakey's site. The fence
had been provided by Texaco and in staff's opinion it would
remain Texaco 's responsibility.
6. Access to the site appears very good with adequate sight
distances for ingress and egress due to appropriate set-
backs being present. Traffic conflict with the driveway
as located would be expected only during periods of heavy
south bound traffic (evening rush hour) .
7. Proposed carwash (according to applicant) may slightly
�, increase patronage and con.sequentJ�y the traffic generation
of the station. Appl,icant states that that cou�.d be a
side effect. Patronage is now 200-250 cars per day.
� � �
,
8.` Staff's evaluation of the rioise added by this instal�.ation ;
, is that it is within acceptable limits (simil.ar unit at ;
� Barbur Blvd. and Capital Hwy. She�7. Station has been visited
by sta�f) and wil�. not likely increase existin� operational
no�ise levels at the property 1.ines. The service station is
subject to noise control guidelines esta'blished by the
, State of Oregon Department of Environ:mental Qua�it,y which
limit noise levels at the property lines to levels unlikely
to in.terfere with ordinary conversation.
9. Site pr•oposed is behind existing station building, approxi-
mately 45 ft. from the rear 1ot line. (It woul.d be a proxi-
ma.tely 60 ft. from the nearest single family dwelling}.
10. Several existing, although comparatively minor violations,
of Tigard Code were noted on staff inspection. These were
outside storage and display of tires, excessive signs,
illegal "A frame" signs and banners and an open trash
collection area.
11. The Tigard Community Plan designates the area as "general
o mEr.cia �� and no NPO or anization has et been formed in
�
c m �
g
Y
this area to provide other input.
12. Waste water disposal wiTl be accep�ted by the Unified Sewer-
age Agency, but a sand and grease trap will likely be re-
quired under the State Plumbing Code.
�- Staff Recommendation
to be advised after close of public hearing.
�
PC Staff 'Report - July 1, 1975 - item 5.Z - 'page 2
s _ _ _ _ ; , . • � i
.. _ _T_ � .� ._ .�
�-�r�-� .�. . '
. , �_�T� �_��..___�_
i h i
� �}� . � � ' I
� 1
r � . . � � . . _— .� . � . .
� - � � � . � �� \ ..
� . . � . . ��y;: �:::;;'Y:yi;:; � .
� . � . � �' 'J/� ' _"'........__ • � � .
. � _ ����f... �.._...... j ' . .
1 . ` '
S h ' AV � —
� '� _ � . � ----- –•-•.
' +_ � ►– • _. . ._
• � � Wr \ _----- ----._------ . _
- :� . -------�------.--�i - -- - .-=� � -- -�:----, � -
� -,---�-- i �
�SW ! � .
7t s! A V E N U �
' �i � _
�
J
, � r– �
w
� �� ~ , �- _ I
Wi. 7End AVE a � � .I
4,�,,,' - � � :
' --- Y�
— �,3 . .
___ _. _1_ .
. - — -� s
� �. --�__. — � T . _
_ _ �- -- � � ,- = ,
, .. _ I �W 74 h � AV
_���
� S W � T�th AVEN E -- • _
� _ • I I
� . - I �.
. , r- -
� s � .
� � _� W .
` ) 2 � , •
. _ `� . ' � n "� ' ` ��
; �
—•-- 1 -- - —•�� � � ,.
_ _ . ___ _u� .-_ _ _ _ _ ' , ,
, .. .,• 's �� i..asS.. � ..I,�. ' ,a:�;.a ��...
� �
1 � ��,t �t,�'1�3.� � �t�� �37!
�ti: �'. ��,,` '�V �'1L ,. 'ti
� } � �-MANUFAC?URING
•� t P.O.Box 1398•Beaverton,Oregon 97005•Phone 644•0749 /�� �7��
�� ��
r�.y 20, i975
Tigard. Planning Commission '
12�Y20 S. W. T�2a.in St. ,
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Sirs: ' ,
It is a proven fact that people �rho own automobiles are xesponsive
to having their automobile washed particularly where such serv'3.ce as
� car washin� is made ava,ilable to them.
This type service has proven advantageous when 3.ncorporated into a
service sta.tion facility.
It is the intent o�' this application to extend the present condit3.on-
' al use to include this additional service into this service station.
It in no way conflicts with the present operation now• existing at this
service station or ��ith the city of Tigard's comprehensive plans for th3.s
location.
I �_ There are presently no existing car S•rashes serving the community at
the North end of the city. This particular service station, with
its large accessable area would readily accomadate such a washing
facilii;y and offer this fine service on a very convenient ba,sis.
� The "Swab Bee" Car W�,shing P�achine to be insta7.led here has .no adverse
� features that would be contrary to the acijaaent properties, neighbor-
hoods or the environment. This machine is revolutionary and fea�ures
the fbllo►aing advantages:
. a.� P10 high energy demand; xuns on 110 Volts� just plu� it in.
b. No high water discharge� uses less than 25 Gals. per car.
c. rto high noise� the sound is not above voice 1.eve1 during the
washing process. ,
The appearance of the machine is in harmony with the surrounding ar-
chitecture and compl3.ments the service station very nicely. •
It is believed that only the best interest of the public is served with
,�ie�i�stallation of this machine.
�_•=
� `� Z�/,I�. �vans��`_..�'_..----
�LB� MA1W�'ACTURII�'G C0.
�
7�T!;/w
�.. �..,,,m .�.-,,._,r,. ,a. ,.f,..�„ . . . .�,.,,.,._ .,,...
� ,. „ ,, ,. ..
, _ _ �
, n
r ._... , _.... . . � . .
� �� . ,, , �j���, � . �
. . . �l��1�ti��.�i�'�t.J' ►:�:i� �/1� �:.�'�.1 x°�.�:�. 1�.�.;a'�1"�'�.r+ �,
OF
� WASHINGTON COUle1�TY � �
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING--150 N. FIR5T AVENUE
HIIISBt)RO, OREGON 97M3
, (503) 648•862) �
BOARD OF COMMISSIQNERS Msy 20� 197'S Genera Man'ap�an
BURTON C.WILSON JR.,Chairman
VIRGINIA DAGG Noom 302
RICHAAD C.HEISLER
RAY MtLLER '
ROD ROTH � '
Mr. Don Williams ,
L. B. Manufacturing '
. . p. o. Bos� is9s �
� Beaverton, Oregon 97005 �
Dear Mr. Wi17.iams:
SUBJEGT: CAR WASH - 11834 S. W. PACIFIC IiIGHWAY
In response to your phone inqui�y of May 1.9, 1975, this is to
advise you that the Unified Sewerage Agency has no objec�ion
�.� to a portable car wash being installed at 11834 S. W. Pacific
Highway.
' The compatation of fees wi11 be handled through the city of
Tigard and the service billing will be based on water usage,
also �hrough the city of Tigard. �
We hope this satisfies your inquiry, and if we can be of further
as.sistaaae, please contact us.
Very truly yours,�
, �
� ` ��' ��c.��'.-�:..G�
-�% �
�net Luttrel]., Admin. Coordinator ,
' Engineering Division ,
JL:vr
cc: City ot Tigard
\ .
�..r�..., .•.��.-x++�rn±��••��ntyir+l�+*`eNe.IMrMV�y.r.mwrtrrz�n�«1'�1atrMftrx�•... . . . . .
. .:� � .. .��........ , y .;�:...,. .vfu r41....,a rw i .
� . . . . � . . '. .. .. � . . ., ...,.- ., ........ ..... .. . . . . .., , . ... .
�:�. �.. ..�.. .ry, .:.�. r�.e �...,�n �
�,.
- ' ° ,
, ; �. .Si� -=--=--'-'-="-.__._, ---�' . '. , � . • 1 -"�\., I
r., t . .r. . � . ►. . , � � ��, I
.h
1
. .
, `� � I
I �.�
. ` �
.
.
� t � . � \I
'� . . � •� . ----
--•, � � ;� �;,.�_.�.__�. ,.� —•---- —__�_T_._.�._�.....__;. _..... : .. _�.._
, ,S'` �.�� / . • ' . .
� �, /J . ,
f !, , ' . . �'.
� / ;:��X /' . �iPO/Q�„�"p
� . ���,�,�� ;' � � - . � C�4.� !.^,��s,c,/
_,_ `, �ya�t�' i , ' • � . .. . � � , ........:...•....�...y..����� ;���i�r��t.�<.�
,� < <1: •::• .:.:•:•• �
\ �:— ;�:.:::_:• �;::;..>;��, _
r4 ��� . , � . � • .
� .
�,. `� � , . ;
��J �a� .i� . _.. �.� .
�. :;:;�
�, � r
��, . ''';;�.:': ;'::.;:zD Ga/..,. , ,
�V� �X / .Id•: ::::<s:;�;:�;'':�:<�::::�:�;::`•::;;;;;;; o. uak: ,
, ��0� // .•.f••�••. �T � ,.
�' �'���� I , ' ' • . • L`-o'�.., c�:,:. '_ - i � /
: �/ , Fiu. �,;✓.• _. � , �. .
I� ! �'lo Ia � �'an,�:.
;J, . /,r �---,Q.C. �G2'/77) ` • .J . • . ••-- --- �--—:J L_ ' ``- �`j/�'I:l:
,� � .� '��,i,.._J .. �� . ' — — ` _
'� / f�� , _� . «_._,._.. - -� - -- -- - - -- _ �
;, .;,:� . . ;��.. r��.� . . �
i�; /f, . : ; I . . ... , ',
/� . �. �') � � �� .. .��O 1
,/J,�� -... . �, i ' � ' . � • I
tJ,':°Y,{)Ur�I��
�, . " . ��j �rui�: ax'/�z��,�• ' , ""t ' t
� .��' . �I ��i��. :✓a!� ��.__...._ ...._.-_. _ __._...__._
�' . �� . . ' -
� '
, . . ., .._. i �� -. _:. ..�� ��, � . _� �
. � � � � �- r; -�,� �� ���. 1
. � . . . 1 .Er..vi�_ __Q?'--.- �I
� � '. U � - �-�--� ._.._ _.�. ,�,�.�_ _ . . � 1
:i � � � _.__. —_ ._ _ `.,.._...�._
� �: • . . . _.... . , i, ,,t
�. : �i I� � .... .__i�... . . . . , r , ;
' � , ' �. • 4,.;. � � . (� � Co.%�/ ./pt!If /�! �" yi
. �� '<�. � , ,v�:•�... �:/oI l� •
, + . ' ;:,h�' ! I ' � \. CU�`f; t'.t
. \ y�� p� . 'It ... . - - _ ._`•,.- — -
.\1 �.. �_�_�. 1-•. �.
. �..; � , � . 1 ---.'�-j,��--;�-�t --._, .'�. � -; �: :�_; . . : ._._.��
. . . , ` , . . . ----'���-t�;-���1-(=��-�} � • �-- .
. . . ,
, ;
: -,, --. . ._�._ � _ _ _ _ :.. _ _ �- _
' ' � ;'�:"�h u,-;?� �;.'tN'� �•'^ � . ;
� i �ar�:/'r a7�.:_...,C a•'�- i �
� � . . , ' , 0 � •i -..
,` ! � � � ��'�...7 L '? .r,.
� '� '
�- .i J
=/X�,� �/.�X J'r,�l,,�/ • ' 3~� ----- � ' ..��/_'p�, _
a _.,. _ �,
. , , , . -
- /r,•t�•/% co'��/.j a�.r/n � _ �. ' - .• ' "' •-----1---
T`yF= "c:'. /n/ . , '
, � ,;��i�ini.iri'� L��.�;'-���rr•• .
u D�o �t CC�ric. .::•/v[;: •>'t�
a�/ �Dov/r.?�•rr • , ��� ,�'�� f,�:iii ri, crr � ,S, �."
�Pf.a�;�f.r W/ • � , '
f' � "-���' !
�� : � , ' ' .
. . .... _ _ .�_____.. .._ ..______.._
(/ ~f,. �.,�5. i )T`i��� :3...�• .�
� r ��, • .... .... . -- .. . - \ i/;''r��. J✓f-�+ N..°. ��r:'y:':,;,::✓ Ci!/� . , ' �•,. • ., ..
. ....._ _. '��C./'�r,]?�': /C�2 f� ��i�y . . .
�y L/t�h�' ' �, ; ��!=x�.^�iny 7:�fc;�c*, l��r�+k.:}ti ..._ �,;�a.�a � r"'- i i /rl��
� C ✓t'.!'N/ f,!
i`' i�':.�/i)�i � , . ' • � �(�'J'FV/�T�I/ G[IL.' CJn!y .r'.!""r// (;:
,�� . �
`i !
�� � .. . �Y�Wt,•�r., ..
STAFF REPORT
T'igard Planning Commission
Ju1y 1, 1975
Agenda Item 5.3
CU 13-75 (Nine-T-Nine Towing - Eugene Dooley)
Conditional Use .
for an automobile storage lot to be located behind 12566 SW
Main. St. on an unimproved rear portion of the building site.
Staff Findin�s
1. Due to a discrepancy in the original applica�;ion for this
conditional use permit, the matter is con-tinued from June
17 at the applicant' s request.
2. Auto storage, like all outside storage, is allowed in a
C-3 zone as a conditional use when ". . . essential or in-
cidental to any permitted use in the C-3 zone. . . "
3. An automobile service station (incidental repairs) , auto-
mobile repairs, painting and upholstery, automobile and
trailer sales areas and automobile parts and accessory
sales are a11 conditionally allowed in a C-3 zone.
��<
4. The site proposed is zoned C-3 and is designated "general
commercial" by �the Tigard Comprehensive Plan (NPO #1 Plan) ,
excepting that portion in the flood plain of Fanno Creek
which is designated '�Greenway" .
5. The sites �enerally east and west of the site on Main St.
are zoned C-3 and are in commercial use. The vacant land
to the rear is zoned A-2 on the west side of Fanno Creek
and presently M-4 on the east side. �
6. Present use of the site is a cornmercial bui�ding housing �
the Tigard Library and a wholesale book company {Lanson's) .
�
Total full time equivalent employment of these combined is j
approximately 9 persons. Additionally, there is approxi- ''
mately 2500 sq. ft. of vacant space in the rear of the ��
building. The f�oor area of the building is approximately �
12,000 sq. ft. (This figure is scaled off a map and may be i
20% to 30% off) . The building occupies the front 100 ft. �
of the lot. The �ot dimensions are approximately 50 ft. �
wide by 450 ft. long. �
�
;
7. A smal.l amount of' off-street parking is available in front F
of the bui�ding in the sidewalk and front setback area, j
a�.though no designation of parking spaces exists there. j
An un.paved drive extends al.ongside the building to an area �
�, in the rear where parking could be possib�.e if suitab�y ;
developed and maintained. i
� �
-
. _ _ , ... ,.
-�. Staff Estimates the parking demand of the building (assuming
�� 50% of the gross area of the building is usable office and
sales area and the rest is storage) at 10 to �2 parking
spaces. Tigard zoning code, as currentl.y written, would
require a minimurn of 31 parkin.g spaces.
9. Applicant proposes to provide a sight obscuring fence around
his proposed storage area.
l0. The area proposed for auto storage is located partly within
the f�ood plain district as identified by Ch. 18,57, Tigard
Mta.nici al Code. Exact extent of the hi h water or l;ocation
P g
of the flood plain boundary has not been verified although
the U. S. Corps of Engineers �lood profile shows the ele-'
vation af a 100 year flood at the ad,jacent Main St. bridge '
as 150f MSL'. Elevation of the 1973 flood at the Main St. i
bridge was 149' MSL. Tigard''s �'lood plain district ordinance
_ . „ allou�s parking areas, if suitably protected from erosion, �
in the flood plain. �
11. Nine-T-Nine towing, until recentl,y, leased a 10:0' by 1.00' , ;
` lot in the rear of Knause Chevrolet. At the tizne of appli- �
cation there were 19 cars in it. �
;
12. Site Development Plan and Architectural De�ign Review is � 4
required for existin.g buildings when a major remodel_ing i�
� undertaken.
Staff Recommendation
to be advised after close of public hearing
' t
_ �,
� � �`��
��
;.
�'
, f,
f
. . . ...k•..
�
5
j
. . . . . . . .: �
� .. . .� . . . . � � .� �.
�
L
� � � � .� . . � .. ��.
. . � � �. . . . . . . ..p
` . . . . . . � � . . . .. , ,. �
. . . . � � . . . , � � .1
. � � . � � � ���1
. . . . . . . . . . � .4i
. � . . � � . ..� {�
II . . . . . � . � . . . ..
. � � � � � . � �� .�,
' �'��� . � . . . . . }.
G
(,
F
PC Staff Repor°L - JulY J., �.975 - pa�e 2 .
�, � ,
, . p.�%� . �
. .. . �. . � . . . . � ��.. k�y . . . . . . .
STAFF REPORT
Tigard Planning Commission
�,,. Ju�.y 1, 197 5
Agenda Item 5.4 :
CU 14-75 (Auto Parts Store - TCT Supply Co. )
Conditional Use
for a retail auto pa.rts store to be located in an existing
building (former Haney Magnavox store) at 12200 SW Main St.
Staff Findings
l. The site is zoned C-3; General Commercial, presently. The
zoning ordinance amendment creating the new C-3M zone will ;
be effective;'.: however, this rnonth. The uses perznitted on '
this site either as '�conditional uses�' or' "permitted uses�' �
will not be altered by that change.
,
�
2. Auto parts and accessory sales are a conditional use allowed 1
in -this zone, �
a
3. Existing land use of adjacen.t Main St. parcels consists of �;
' ' � a bank and a post office. There is a vacant commercial �
building across the street and a clinic building to the rear.
4. Applicant intends to le�se 3000 sq. ft. of a 5000 sq. ft. i:
�. • building.
5. Parking required by Tigard code is 9 spaces (1 space/500 sq.
ft. plus 1 space/2 employees plus 1 spaee/establishment)
for the applicant's proposed activity.
6. The T_i�ard Community Plan and the adopted NPO #1 Comprehensive i
Plan designate this area for general commercial use. ;�
� ��
7. The site would benefit from provision of landscaping in con--
formance with present city code; however, Design Review is r'
not usua�ly required unless a building permit for major ` �
remodeling is appl:ied for, although landscaping could be
re uired as a condition of a conditional use ermit. �`
c1 P
Staff Recommendation �'
€
' �
to be advised after close of pub�ic hearing a
€
�
Y
. � � � �..-����
� .. . . . � . .... g
� � � � � � . . . <: �,�r
. � . . . � ���.�..$
. _ .. � . �. . . n
. . . � - . �. �. . . . . . . '.:...�d
. . . . . � . . . . . . . . . .....p�
4
t
. �
�' �,;
�
�
' • �� �,��
+�
b�`�
�". ,
., ' .. —
— . , -, �. � .� , ,,��
�• ` ,000 .� `, t - � • �oo
' • ��� •� � i `. ' � ' �� �,..
,` . / .
• t 800 9 �.♦ v� s `�� °, � 3O Q�� fy�a` � 800 �
. 2 G '� , �
1900 �O / y9 `, ~ u '.JLAc
[` r
. ` , ` .�`G' • r�
` ` 11 �. '� � ' � �/ � .��..` • �. . � � . 900 � l
YQOO � �' � Y ` ✓ Y s ro�e
� /� i � i / ��
�` ` � .` s � � �� 2T � / � `
. . • � i � � �. / � . D �? �
' � IJ � /� � � ' ' � 26 ♦\ / � •` • � �
� ♦ f,� � ♦ / � `� �L
�:, 100 14 � � �` �p � /' � I S ` •Q�i� /'� � °� �♦
. �A i , ��G •. • -' �'� ` `
. � �
�F� 2200 IS ��E/ 11 ^;Cj� � , 24 ♦ � ►e ` 7 .��
� � ✓ Q� SI00 , , Q' � � �
.�-� � w`�� 16 , �i� ,� ( � � 2 , �•r� ierr �` \ . ♦` .
� 17� �v� „ � . ; ~�?� �2,�\ �'j�� x��..• �; G `�� \
( `� ` ``,,•d��` � , �S ;; '�5200 y ,a�4'+?• �,_ f � ��� `��.
l ' �
. _ „� i�•��.14 ♦ i . 1 � � � . � .
� ,t � � �. � �
�_ - ` . 20 � S \ - ♦
13 � 5300 „ �/ 2 j0� �I.♦
C � ♦.•�c. .ti
� ` \
� ``r ' - . � ` 16 5500 19 r 1�► a:;;:i:. ti • � ♦\ ��
\ '•
.. � - , �4 ' � is�: � P� �' . .
`�<' '••/ � ,` c+ IT`'• �' • �� • 'ti:.t��i•l rtzS!1;"E;'�Ft:•�cs.w,uxv �' s� ♦` i i
" • �.. . , i� �� rr`;� .�. .. :.' 4 � /
ti � �`` •: � j �• ::.iii�:;:i:iiF�: • �� �•
��� � �` �� � ` : �r / 40�'O '� `•�` .2J00 � .♦ , tl� ��� ' `r.� ,�
`C . �IDas "i�4 �s/e , ' � V
}` � 1 � � V� � • 5�•C 51073� � � •
/ ♦ 3 . .�
� ` 2 �\ �•� r ♦` 250► b • . �
�. � � in� ' `.
• � . �. S .
, . . ., �
5• . . �
. 'tt� ,. : ` �� ` t ` ~ ,it'i�-� � �` .f'2600�O��jw-� ,
. j �:,�t41Q0 :b.. \ .� � ��° Il.1a ' "Y_�1 /
� Jp y , �\� � •� , /�� V . 'I
♦ J �, � �• '�
�• `S .r - � . ( � � •+ '..� , �� z800•'~
��~� �r �� 1�° �i f�t•��'. �nw1 ' �'� .30JOc� . /;� ?IAs. , .
r 4� ,�O ���4 •. � ri. n•�s� ���• ' � � .
\ • C • . r w K n��.n� 27 � / �� n . ..
r�a�' ��; ;��•� ��: i.cw:i�ci\�� �� / jl 29U0; . ..
�► / �.��� lllt.
4900 .i � � \ r'
'S(1QQ. � 1l.ik. �. .1�' /i�� . .` �' � ' '' ,,• .
a�` S1 / •�: 4200 a` 3902 � 2i
. �. �� •�j L j• KkJ .� �,J . NJ�a � � .
� _ J, v �✓ f .
•1, S . ati ,:• 3 , � � ti ,
.. � � •..,, � i ,' ,s
��., �'y • , ' / • v .
/ � F9 . aeo� ., i .��� ` . . � f
`�,.. �� s'C • 'y . Nit (� '.,� � / / T
�p,� � :� w.�lai .Oi� / f ��� ' �'r ..
f'C... S . ,16QQ v � .// \\ /� 2A .
��4't .�C' t illtr �� V �. ��O S� �'` '� ��` • •' �. .
. �' '9 A% . , .0 . �. ,y�� �.' �i�� . �� + D�002 •`'
c",��9 C� , . � �9 � ' � J�'\ •,� � �� ii�.
'10� . . ,,�,�' � � T7 � ♦A� � ��'�L I
�
�
. . � ,�,
c� _ �; ��:��� � � ��. � �
�' T0: Planning Commission Staff �
. Planning Commisstam �
City Council .
SUBJECT: Answers to ques�ions for
Zoning I�2ap Amendment Application
1. Q Pleese state the specific purpose of
your proposea zgne change.
A The speciYic purpose of the proposed
zone ahange is to permit conditional _
use of present zone for a retail par•cs
and accessory etore.
2. a Is the requested zoni.ng in conformance
with Tigard's adopted Comprehenaive �
Plan and other adopted precise plans �e
may be, related to your request.
A W� f eel that the proposed variance would
complement the main street environment
as well as be an economic asset to the
� community. It does congorm to the Com-
prehensive Plan as we understand i1;.
3. Q Does you� proposed zone change Pulfill
a communityr need for the proposed use.
A Th� proposed conditional use does fuli'ill
the nead in the community for en auto
gupply store that is deaigned for the
individual rather than the dealer�garege
wholesale client.
4. a Have there been ohanges in conditiions
( i.e. land use, street capacity, avail-
ability of sewer and water aervide,
etc. ) tY�at woulcl f ustify n ahanga in •
zone.
A As we see it Main Street, Tigard, ia
changing tn become a more retail �
area that it has been in the past.
These changes in conditions have made
the area attraetive tn us. .
� °
_ . . _ . : ._.._ - -
..� . , . _ . �
M - . .+' .,. �- �,, �� . . . . . . .
�._: �
5. Q Why is the propased location Por your
proposed zone change more suitable
than other locations in the Citp
zoned to ellow your proposed use.
� A This location is most suitable to us
'for the 2'ollowing reasons: �
dA Physical Location- aentrally located.
in the heart oi the Tigard Business �
DistriQt. The vis�bility is gooA
from both main arterials.
� Traffia Flow- The amount of traffic
- and apparent destination of the traPfic
indicates they are arriving or departing
th�s a�ea and not �uat enroute.
Q Availability- There is a shortage of
buildings of this size and pr�ce range in
the Tigard market.
DQ Parking- Is adequate for out needa.
Approxim�tely 3.3 parkin� spaces
per 500 square feet. '
6 o Q V�hat eff ect wil], your proposed devel-
��' opment have on ad�ACent properti es and
on the ad3acent neighborhoods.
A The planned store will have no eff ect on
the ad�acent propertp, with the exception �
+ that our type oP store has an extrem].y
high success �o failure ratio. This might
� possibl� m�ke the ad�aeent prape�ties
� , e.ttra�:t a more success orientated clientele.
7. Q 1Nt�at types oP public services are neceseitated
' by your proposed development and what impac�
will yotir pro�ect h�ve c�n these public
services. .
A We see no immediate or long range additional
� publ.3�c services as neoessary. With the
exc�ption that occupied buildings with goods
' in�ide might require polioe cooperation. But'
an the other h�nd empty buildings are by
Psr more sub�ect to vandali�m.
�'-
.�-- ..,, _
. , , �... ��,. •
�.
TTGARD AREA MARKET STUDY * FACT SHEET
Drawing Area - Five-mile radias
V�hicle Registration History - 1970 to 1975 shows 299�
� incr�ese.
Number of Parts Stores - Three I
Number of Retail-Only Parts Stores - None i
Average spent on parts per vehscle, this market, �175.00 par snnum
( does not include tires and batteries)
�Iarket Potential -'
Veh. Registration 30, 100
Annual Aveg. Eapend. 175.00
�5,267,500.00 per ennum
Market Penetration - (Exi�ting Distribution)
Store �1 500, 000.00 per annum
Store 2 300, 000.00
Store �3 450, 000.00
Oil Co. outlets 2, 000, 000.00
Discount Sto�es 350�0_�_0_ 0.00
� , 3, 250,0— 00.00 TOTAL PENETRATION
�lvailable Market - �2, 001,700.00 per annum, going out of the �igard
area Market.
� �
�
:4 .
�` . . . - . . . � ...
�
'�� � � . � � . . . . . ,
rr� . . ,. ......� ... ... :..... ,.. �,.... � . �. ... . �.. .., . ,... . ." __�... .��-- , .. . � , �
.,..i. ... .._yt -.+�.�.....
�
6�'�"Kr,dL W/N,t
r�
� STAFF REPORT
Tigard Planning Commission
�...
Ju1y l, 1.975
Agenda Item 6.1
MLP 4-75 (Sabre Construction Co. - S. W. Landmark Lane)
Minor Land Partition
An application to a11ow the partitioning of a part of Tax Lot 600,
NE 4f Section 12, T2South, Range l West, W.M. located at the end of
S. W. Landmark Lane, West of 72nd Avenue. (TL 600, 2S1 12A)
Staff Findings
1. Conditions of a previous major land partition creating S. W. Landmark
Lane have been satisfied with the exception of a dedication on S. W.
72nd to accomodate a future realignment of the curve section between
S. W. Sandberg Street and S. W. Landmark Lane.
2. The site is zo�ned M-2, Genera]. Industrial and conforms to site size
and access requirements for that zone.
3. S. W. Landmark Lane was approved as a non�standard street by the Planning
Commission, adequate turn-around and access have been provided for.
�
�. !+. A11 public utilitiesraie available to the site.
5. The surxounding land use is general manufacturing.
6. Pedestrian access (sidewalks) are to be provided on Landmark land under
provisions of the previous Major Land Partitioning: a single sidewalk
on the north side of Landmark Lane may satisfy that requirement to the
satisfaction of Planning and Publ.ic Works Di�ectors.
7. Indirect Source Permit may be necessa=y from the Department of
Environmental Quality.
Staff Recommendation
Approval on condition that
� remaining conditionsof Landmark Lane
Major Land Partition be satisfied
�
�.
,
_ �... . ;_ _
.
. . _, .� ;
� .
.:.._._._�_ _. _ .__ _ _ _
, - ��r'� � ._ . _
�.�,�u,.�f��r'�
~c:.,�,' i;(:> �� '
,. .,� , : ��.., � �.,, ,
�vD;;��'.; J. i��:'il� Jc. I SCALE /"�=1vo
2ii�3
w.-_- - --- �
�✓o rE :
�' p /NO�C.s�r.ES 'SB�X3o"/eon� �'oo...�r'T �
r //✓O/CATE.S i►'/oNU��NT Fovr/O A„�' /1�0 TGrO �I
. ��
i
' �� _ ��,�✓� a� �C�T �� y,
; ��,
� �'�'�,r��'' T�J,�j ��7���/ 111� /��j"�� i
,���a����ri��,► �+���ri��.���► � ���
��
. ;
,
�:
. . � ( �
�6�0 �`-"d. �'
� q/�,��� , �• �zo � -s'/-i�oo �
� �
�G �°"� i �,
. 6 53..5'� � � � i �.
o s3 '�f-r ` ' '_ _. . _... __., ___. ;.� yz.��t� �I
. d" �
���i�a� � �� I� . ."� � '� ', � .�li
�.,r-- i. !'g i� i�
, �'I . � ` f 7 6.-s�� — ___..__ _.. ' _ oi F��
�.� i �f� /�!e9`sa '.�o •rs-: 2 �,
/ � y � �{ t� M I
� -i:'- .- � � ;'-� . m n i
,1 ....__---�_ ,t.�,.G � f ' - AL N � 'I
� i �/C.C" �'�� T t n1
�_w G I j ,, , . N' ��
u��, � o.� r. � �2. 66 .•�c.�eEst r o S-o c��.v E�e�r� L...�E � ,�s..o.y��s.) P
,�^� .9c.e.� r-.e•s�cr�/_?.3
� O t � . v F E�9s E n/E..+i«�C�t ���`s 2. �� �....s.•r�y a�.-'��`..T -•�' "` ��.� �' I
�I /?FT .. . .n�. .. .°1".'�.""..,,. e��"- ,./ 3c3�aar�,...—�-- 17 .i
�i � V l
' �� R �U,- •. _. _ _._--•------- .-.s�r- .��c'.y7 T o �ISE� I�✓I T•V O fh'd�2.S. � _. �� . ,
p 0� �,�' ' p '�.� . ��K� S� BJFCr �-o �/8.�°/2 :S'a ..E , �73 00 • .- -�; i
M1 . .. - ;-1� .2�i�
/ � ` �I
293.SB 2Ao.00 ��� 2/ �: 0 IiS,oi.CC,
.gg�,g8 ' � ' �� ; � � �.
_ ¢,30. . r' �
- i r; �� ¢� /3.PDf'EQrY ' 0 �
is�. " � � . � � o �I,
/ ,� \ `� �
_ 'o �� j�C`jf��Cfi�Gl�l �n a �o,,�r. 2. so �'• '� � � �
� � `�. STL C~L f�n CL. o F�.!'EA SvB�. To.3o �FNSrf�, '
� �V Q � ' � N �I
��=.�, e n 'o ti ����
<;.� � � !° � o . �'
a�.�,8's. � � Q N N
�.� �y h Q, � �;�
6B 0 ,1 . � '� ��I
c �'�h4 IZ . , � , , ;,I
'�� �"'h r � /B9./4' t� _ s• -. +S{,$9°/Z Sa..� ` .pr 73 0 0_ -- -- � , � �� �I
\�` `;' ,,1 O ` - - ��.v r• ..i 7 A:'2 t� Er E,2./� s'�� 7r�E.OSE NE N 3',�� � �o, '�O � �,�C e Ei
.� �Sth �c46.��� "'_!�, • 4?.3.�4 �`o ��... L:ne _!�o - p.',r`�;d
- — "�}9 �. ' ` o '.i^✓ c4} 2.60 -s'O'`tt�' �
��� � � '��.L9���' f�BE'.rJ.L'/NCS� � . . i���l, � ��I
/,B o o t,.,/ !r Ll/.£'/6 N 1` . � . ...��
�Scr of���'✓ O 2i G'i NA G �.eofo c'.e r y` L i,.,�E ( �
. Sti�e.�"F'y - S�'S�6 9� ' . ` �j
C�s'f'M'�ci1i7" �. . ` . . . � . i° . _ ' . � , . .�
� i�,.• .l3�c'. 59�; - - • 66 /. 6S �'a�ti'�i ^ - ` -' �' ' t
. c� �' 9� �7 3 _ - ,. . ., . � i ;���
' O_ .5°sS'p°'�9•, . , . , , , �. '�
' .. O�'�s.��' .�_ -9�Eto. 70 , ' . � ' • ! ,A,� .
� , .. G, r 9's.oca - 4�.rL. = 2°-�7;S"'¢.. � . , � ,.:
� ' • { �°- 1P. 93% , . � ,�.;i;r,.i
' . Y : f.y�. '. G',c e.r�. .�/,B�°S.9'/6•�w,' 4�. �H .�t/ %'
_.
'� ' G
� ,
•. . � � . _.... .. .
. . . � :
� . � , ti � . .
� ,. . �, , , . . .. . _ _ . .
- . � ��'�'w�,.t
STAFF REPORT �
Tigard Planning Commission
Ju1y 1, 1975
�.- Agenda Item 6.1
MLP 3-75 (Leron Heights #3/J. A. Paterson)
Minor Land Partition
An application to allow partitioning of a part of lot 82,
Leron Heights #3, for a single family home site on SW 116th
Ave. , 600 ft. north of Katherine St. (tax lot 1200, tax map
1S1 34CD) .
Staff Findings
l. This matter is continued from the Planning Commission meeting
of June 17, 1975.
2. '�Lot 82, Leron Heights #3" appears to lie nearly entirely
within the area of the Flood Plain District as de�ined by
Tigard Ordinance 74-50 and Washington County Public Works
maps titled '�Flood Plain'� , Washington County, Oregon.
3. The Ti�ard Community Plan shows the wet�ands adjacent Su.mmer
Creek on this site as "greenway" .
4 � 4. Recent flooding has been recorded by nei hbors at approxi-
mately 162 ft. elevation (mean sea level�. According to
the aerial planimetric maps developed for the City of Tigard,
the parcel proposed for segregation is nearly entirely lESs
than that elevation.
' 5. Applicant has provided survey data supporting his conten�tion
that the proposed lot provides a usable building site at
approximately 161 feet {MSL) . (Attached survey map shows
3 points at 161.92 feet, 162.32 feet and 161.82 feet MSL
elevation, elevation of. a 4th corner is not shown) .
6. Deve�opment within the Summer Creek drainage basin has been
slow recently due to �.imited line capacity of the existing
sewer and due to the large size and consequently high de-
veloprnent costs of the remaining developable lands. Since
most of the Summer Creek drainage basin is upstream of this
site, the impact of future development will be felt in the
area o� this proposed partitioning in -terms of higher over-
bank flows, increased velocities an;d shorter peaks.
7. Access to the parcel proposed w uld be from the northerly
part of 116th (off Tigard Drive) , whi�h should terminate in
a cul-de-sac ra�her than the present dead end arrangernent.
Any such street improvements shoul.d be kept above flood
� levels by a sufficient height to ensure the availability' of
emergency access. An alternative could be to put 1�6th �
through, crossing Summer Creek. Staff finds this alter-
native not acceptable due to the necessity of filling across
the floodway and due to the potential �'or increased through
traffic which wou�:d adversely affect the existing neighbor-
� ;: ��
hoods in ou 'view. �
8. There are presently 8 houses on SW �16th, which is improved
;'` � for appr,oximately 400 ft. from Tigard Drive.
���.. �
9. Public sewer and water services are available to the site.
10. Zoning is R-7, single family residentialg and the �'igard
Community Pl.an shows the area as Urban Low Density, with
a greenway designation in this particular area as dis-
cussed above.
Staff Recommendation
Approval with conditions;
1) A cul-de-sac at the end of SW 116th be provided.
2) No exposed portion of the proposed house foundation
is to be at less than 161.5 feet MSL.
3) Finished floor elevation is to be not less than 163.5
feet MSL.
4) Any landscaping or structural• fills placed on the pro-
posed lot must be flood resistant and properly compacted.
5) Soils study and foundation engineering be conducted and
, certified by a qualified en�ineer with expertise in
C,_ flood proof buildings.
i
II
r
i
�
I
',
�
:;j
PC Staf_f Report - July l, 1975 - item 6.1 - page 2 ` ;
, �
:�
i;i
l
�
�_ . . ,, . _. . :. _ . _ . ,,; .�. .,, ..':,:. , .,. .,., . � ,., �
..�--�-_.-��-xz�—��..,t.�__._.. ��._ � _ _ _ .. .. � . _ __ _ .
_ _ ___ _ _ �.��_�
- ' I I . � �
� �-
►- . - :
, - vi .;
J
. O
�
. W -
. �. - � � � . . ��. . � . � .. . a. - .
� - .. . Q.' . . . . . . . .
, � ' N
!� . .
��� _ � " z 8'WI t t th AVE .
J
• . ! Q
. _ ;
� S W 113tfi AVENUE .
�/�'
3 ✓ l � •�
` N .
�� f , (, .
—
�- �E UE . - . . �
.
T;,,,�...,..
1I6 h �
�,� ' � ' . .
� f- A NUE �
O
W
� W
►C W
d � . I(8 ih v' F-
v�
� � � 8�► SW •
�� G�ti
_V z .
r S J Z
9 �' Z
� W 119 h -' a
� � S W �
� ,
�
� 1
" _ � . � y _ .
s > � _ .
� . h � �:r - e„�,%
.,
_ . .
: ' —.�--- ; ;�
' � ��
,.�.,; : .;.,: , .. >. ,. ,, � ; , ;;;
_
�� ,�., . �_.� � . .:
% \�� . . X 188 X 188.3 _�i
� �� ;
.��� ;� _'X � �-X i
,�EL , '4 � tn
�8� 1 ' x'
s + � o J o
,sY. i . X:� , X' ��
��,: 17 9.3 C ' �`1
� _P. �(— M.H. -Xu � ri
� •�! . /�O^ � k�.
F
� �l
��
/. Y � 4�
�� �Q ' . �5
� ��� � P � !��
/i �G + ' ' X ,,
�
f � W ` �X-:�'
W , MN. • • > L—_ —X
• Q
• MH. /70 . a .
O ' � \;�:
X F-- X � �'
�68.0 . ._
, • 1-
� ---x . — ' a �;:
� ' 3 X— . • f.
X vi ;
I C C.
� X C y F
� . —�— . 0 .t��ri
.. . . �� . ' - �'
. __ � �„�.��,- _ . �6� X �1(/ ;
� � ' ii�E5iiii 67.o t:
. :iiiiieiciiiii�;��i � 1:.:
/ . ii�. �:t
/ "`"i .
1�
iii�iK i�i�i�iig'i .+iii{; . �i
�';� . �� , iii?�.°ii:: '
°�iiiiii�;;iiiii::::i:. iiiii ��y..
�/� ii°i:
._J , :i••
.. . ...irriiij;:;;..�'''ii�iiiii•.. �-- .
. iii'
'�ii�i:riiiii'r.i? .
X
iiiiii•iic'•��iiii.'0 �q
::�::: :::::::
i:.�� X � �,
i:ieiii �ii�i. d X . !�:j
�� il
60 '�-- • � i � � � / 'r.,:
� �:
❑ . `� . � / � �'
' � ,�P - �f . . 4:
/ . i � � �
�
. � � . . I f':
X �T
�.- . . ,�,
��1 . � s,�x � ��
.�-�-X . i �
w X �
` ' X . X - - &
C. . ' • . � / �:
C. � I.
n�
' o MH . MN. � +k
4
r
C. C. —_ ' .
C � . X�
X BRUSH
X O � X � ''i � . ,
/�p � ' •
a � 156.7 X
X '. S P. C •
Q = �
X ~ � '
M.H.
, X' � \ � �
Q t'�f 1 — �c, •-._. .:.
,
. .: . . :
�� : ,. . ';, � ,, •.-.,' .-
� ��r.
�`� R O. BOX 2�6 • TUALATIN, ORBGON 9706� • PHONE b3&68b1 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF
June 19, 1975 �
RE��'ll✓�p ±
�i ty o� Ti gard JUN 2 0 �97�
Tigard City Hall CITY AF �'�GARD
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Attention: Jerry Powell , Planning Department
Re; S;�W:. 116th at the 12000 block
Dear Jerry:
G1e reviewed a proposal to add two more lots to the end of
. S.W. 116th in the LaRonde Heights subdivision. Tualatin Fire
District would like to see this requirement that 116th be put
through to connect to the 116th in the.Burl Heights subdivision.
As you realize, the only way to get across the creek there is
either 121st or clear down at S.W. Tiedeman, more than 2 miles
Ik �� ` around either way. This would give us bet�er emerger�cy access
in this area.
Thank you again for your consideration in asking our opinion
about this proposed new street. .
! If you have any further questions, feel free to call me.
�
� Yours truly, .
� � � �,�.�.�.
Joseph A. Greu1ich ��
Fire Marshal
JAG:dm
�..
_ ...,�;; ,. . . _. _.. .
� ... , , , -�
. . , , -. , .,`_.
d sa� ��
� � E�; .
� � j �•"
�' ' flvc�SC- I.UT � — — ^
� •�• s�' FOU �
� ^�,<r,.. [1=/GS;i f�U(iLWL'Op IVD, tJ
.�'�. .
•�'�', EI. = IGI,>2 eL-1Ga,R�. La`i '7 '
�o � i3�.sa. .r I �y+h pLACE
M,H� E�. ,
�Go.98' �� �z
6L=IG�� r 6Lr161�3� � ____ � . ;
I
�. r�a�se s�r� ,
a •
� o .
�.vT 83 • ��.: i�i,BZ " •
, l.�f�dlU �3 Lci-r 8 .
„ „ ,
HE�GNTS EXN�i31i A � twf+� P►-ACG
. ,
PLkT IV�.3 �
�
,5v' kASF HG�v7' �o �
� _ � .�
�. ��
, � �
,R'� �`'
� Q;.
. �
LoT $I � '
! '
SCALG: 1��,�°' SO� •
E�,160,7�
�' GARA6�
� PnD � � .
� i
�
e �
� ' ' TL•"wAR7 � ' '
'� � � •' '�' Hoc�SE �
5�.., K��NEt��i.N� .�. ,
:, ,
,� ,
.o . .
: � � . . .
� .
, 1 �
� Z _ .
v � .
v
`. '
J'. A ��AN PATkRSON - �`1 �NOI� L �N� C�nf�T� -rrt?,V �
�'XH 1f3:fT "A" = (�ART' vF �.oT E�2a LE�o �U 1-1crs.
P�,�7 iVo� 3 - � s� ��: ��, ►�7�-
^
e STAFF REPOR'I'
�,, Tigard Planning Commission
July l, 1975
Agenda I•tem 7
SCA 1-75 (Real Estate Sign - Lincoln Properties Coe )
Si�n Code Appeal
to extend a 90 day temporary approva7. given for an oversized
real estate sign in a C-P zone near SW 72nd & Hampton
Staff Findin�s
l. Signs requiring a permit in a C-P zone are contro�l�d by
the zoning code.
2. Real estate signs are not specifically allowed under the
zoning code in the C-P zone.
3. Signs not requiring a permit include real estdte signs
of less than 12 sq. ft. in area; therefore, rea� estate
signs are not excluded in the C-P zone, but must be less '
than 12 sq. ft. in area.
�r.' 4. The largest real estate sign allowed in any zone is 32
�. sq. ft.
5o A real estate sign, as proposed by Linco�n Properties Co. ,
serves two basic functions -- one is to advertise the
availability of office space for lease and the other is to
' advertise the realty firm. While staff agrees that ad-
4 vertisement of the property for lease is nec�ssary to the
conduct of business, staff does not necessarily concur that
advertisement of a rea�. estate firm is necessary to accom-
plish the lease or sa1.e of a particular property.
6. The ori�inal action of the Planning Commission allowing the
real estate sign in question for 90 days was an interim
measure to allow the Lincoln Properties Co. to place a
"For Lease" sign on their project until such time as thei�
permanent sign could be approved.
7. Subsequent action of the Planning Commission approved an
amendment to the zoning ordinance that would al�.ow a free-
standing sign (as proposed for the permanent sign) on the
site subject to approval by the Design. Review Board.
8. A preliminary conference with the Design Review Board has
shown the Board reluctant to commit themselves to approve
a sign at the particular. place where the rea�. estate sign
� has been, and reluctant to commit themselves to the par-
ticular design submitted. As there is some time before the
, ; . . . .�,
.�. _ _
,, �> �
� ordinance amendment al�owing the permanent sign becomes
effective, Lincoln Properties Co, has agreed to study the
� design theme they submitted and retur.n with an application
when a�propriate.
Staff Recommendation
Approval for an additional 90 days on the �ollowing cond,itions:
- 1) the appropriate permit is obtained for the sign and
2) Total sign area is not to exceed 32 sq. ft. and
3) Sign is to 'be relocated so as not to constitute a hazard
to motorists.
,
�. '
i
� :
PC Staff Report •- Ju1y 1, 1.975 - item 7 - page 2
�r_ ._ . _ ___ � .._ . ._ ,� .... . .. ... ... . . ... . .._ . _....,. .__ �. ._,�. ., , .�_.,
. -: , � ,
� � � �
� �
�����,�v�D �
JUN 1 y 1975 �
CITY OF, TI�GARD
�
;I
�
�une 17, 1975 ?!
�
`i
�;
Mr. Jerald Powell �
Associate Planner
CitX of Tigard Planning Commission �'
12420 5. W. Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Powell: k
�
Lincoln Property Company recently requested an appeal of the
signing code for Tigard and was granted a sign permit, so that
we could in�tall an 8-ft. by 8-ft. leasing sign for our agent,
The Gilley Company, on our property at Southwest 72nd and
Hampton Street in Tigard. As per our January 1975 sign code �
appeal, the ninety-day permit has expired. We would like to i
� �ceguest tnat the City of Tigard extend our pe�cmi.t for an addi-
tional ninety days, or until a decision is made regarding our
permanent project sign which is now before the Sign Review Bo.ard
and the Planning Commission.
As you are aware, it is very difficult to identify a project or
a leasing agent without some sort of signinq; so it is im,portant
for the success of any development that they have adequate
signing. We would appreciate your help in this matter and would ;
be glad to answer any questions you might have regarding the sign
� and the permit.
Regards,
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY
� `.
W. arkin Hall '
Project Manager
W1LTi:bl
�:
urncaun nNaaear�r camvany 7100 B.W,HAMPTON 6TREET BIJITE 110 TIOARD�OREQON 97220 AREA OOOE 60O-890-5060
� _.... . <._. . . . .._..., _,_.._.. . . ... . .....,_,. ,... _... . ..,,. . ..,..,., ._. .._. .. � .. .. .. . .. ... . . _ .
t . ;� �.T --:-�--�..-�.�..-� �:� .
. , . . ;
M
���r► .''`Y.•� ..�».. �,,,�• �
� � �.,� �� ,
� ...�.�. � ,
. � ``° '.� �
oo��
�
,
�
� Q � ,
,, � � �
�+�
� � Q .
�... � . � o
; , . , �
." , ..+� , �..� ;" s. i '
.
� . . �� t, hi,
I ' , i•y •�- � . .
� �..: �.....� . ti._.J' .
h • 10� � • '
, ",�,", _� �' -��. .Q n`'. ,� ���
�..: C� 4��,,,�"`} ���''""� ,�� �� �
I ' ' � �'
� ` �, � . .� �����
• y4
I �� . �'"� �--� '�
� �� � �f j . �...... i,
C� . � ,
� �
� , � ��, .
, . . �����
� . ' � � �d.��"� . � '..
� . ' o � o�, �, � .
i � �� � . • :i��� � '
� � � � . . , � , ;
, , , , , ' , ,
� � , . � ,
� . ;/, , .
. y� . •
, _ ;
\ . _ 1
'
�,�-� �'�, �o�l S
; ,
. , . ,
. .. . . . . ,
�;
� _ .�,. . , . . . -