Planning Commission Packet - 06/17/1975 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
,
r';f. �
a .
AGENDA
TIGARD PZANNING COMMISSION
� June 17, 1975 - Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m.
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
l. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
June 3, 1975, meeting
4. COMMUNICATIONS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-75 (NPO #2 Rezoning)
A request by the City of Tigard for rezoning ot certain
I
lands within the boundaries of NPO #2 (Greenburg-Brookside)
to conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. (Continued
from June 3, 1975).
� 5.2 CONDITIONAL USE CU 10-75 (Western Tri-Corporation)
IA request to allow warehousing and wholesale distribution
in an M-4, Industrial Park zone, at 9282 S. W. Tigard Ave.
(tax map 2S1 2AB, tax lot 1900).
' 5.3 CONDITIONAL USE CU 11-75 (C. L. B. Enterprises)
A request to allow warehousing and wholesale distribution
of pet suppl.ies in an M-4, Industrial Park zone, at 8900
SW Burnham ("Security Storage"). (tax map 2S1 2AD, tax
lots 2200 and 2300).
5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco/Charles Dunn)
A request to allow a car washing machine at the Texaco
station at 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax map 2S1 36AD, tax
lot 5800).
5.5 CONDITIONAL USE CU 13-75 (Nine-T-Nine Towing Service/
Gene Dooley)
A request to allow placing an automobile storage area behind
the building presently housing the Tigard Library on SW
Main St. (tax map 2S1 2AC, tax lot 1101) .
( 6. SUBDIVISIONS
6.1 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 3-75 (Leron Heights ��3/
J. A. Patterson)
A request to allow partitioning of a part of lot 82, Leron
Heights #3 for a single family home site on SW 116th, 600
ft. north of Katherine Street. (tax lot 1200, tax map
1S1 34CD).
7. OTHER BUSINESS
I
£i. ADJOURNMENT !
� .
�` � � y�. . .. . . . .
j;
, �, �
' �_�, ;'.
��
i'
,�
MINUTES �'
'�igard Planning Commission.
_�,
� June 17, �-9 5 ;';
Twality Junior High School - Lec�Lure Room
14650 SW 97th Avenue - Tigard, Oregon
'l
7_. CALL TO ORDER: Commission.er Ba�l opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. '
in the absence of Chairman Hartman.
2. ROLL CALL: Commissioners present: Ball, Nicoli, Popp, Porter,
Sakata, Smelser, Wakem; staff, Powell
o Ball introduced Dan Smelser as new member of the Tigard
Planning Commission.
o Nominations for vice-chairman were then opened by Ba�l.
o Porter nominated for vice-chairman (Popp) .
o Seconded (Wakem)
o Ball asked if there were any other nominations.
o There being none, Popp moved to close nominations.
� o Ball declared a unanimous ballot for vice-chairman Porter.
�M
o Porter assumed the chair. ?��
��
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of June 3, 1975 �
o Ball observed that he had made the presentation to Whit;taker
of the "appropriately inscribed shovel".
o Porter observed that on page 5 on agenda item 4.1., his pur-
pose was to ascertain whether the "donation" of park land was
valid under the original planned residentia�. district approval
and whether the "park" dedicated on the PR Plan was enforceable. ';
o The minutes were then approved as amended.
4. COMMUNICATIONS: None.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-75 (N.P.O. #2 Rezoning)
A request by the City of Tigard for rezoning of certain 1.ands
within the boundaries of NPO #2 (Greenburg-Brookside) to con-
form with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. (Continued from =
� June 3, 1975) • ;`':
�*
t;;
G=;
E�;
��.
�
N
,
�
� ��
�r�,:�,
. ��.�
A. Staff Report
o Staff report was read and appropriate s�.ides of
� Greenburg Rd. were shown by staff.
B. Public Testimony
o Proponents - Testimony of NPO #2 had been given at
the June 3 public hearing
o Opponents - Art Tarlow, representing Dr. Davis, again
asked the Commission to reconsider re-
zoning of the Davis property.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval as submitted
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Popp said that he felt no sufficient case had been
presented to revise :�he recommended plan of the NPO
and he fe�.t that duplexes, which cou�d be deve�oped
by Dr. Davis under the revised zoning, would be an.
appropria�;e use of the site.
o Ball indicated that he felt the NPO ought to be pre-
pared to defend its reasoning in front of the City
� Cnuncil, especially with respect to the Davis site.
o Motion to recommend NPO Plan as presented (Popp) .
o Seconded (Ball) .
o Motion passed (Nicoli against) .
5.2 CONDITIONAL USE CU 10-75 (Western Tri-Corporation)
I
A request to allow warehousing and wholesale distribution
in an M-4, Industrial Park zone, at 9282 SW Tigard Ave.
(tax map 2S1 2AB, tax lot 1900) . ;
A. Staff Report �
o Staff report was read by Powell. !
i
B. Public Testimony
Proponents: {
1
o A real estate agent for the owner, At�.as Land Co. , ;
described the project and the proposed permittee's i
space in the project and stated that the owner was
prepared to clean u� the site to conform with City �
� ' ordinances. �
i
,
1
�
PC Minutes - 6/17/75 - pa�e 2 j
i
�
_ i
_ ,
_ _ _ �
� � t�#` 3��* .
� o Ric�;'rhomas, one of the appl.icai��'cs , stated that the
name of the applicant had been chai�ged to Tri-Americas
Corp. from We�tern Tri-Corp. and he described the
� - nature of the �btzsiness.
Opponents:
o Mr. Uern RisY�erg, adjacent property owne.r, stated
that he was opposed to further industrial develop-
inent near his apartments.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval subject to the owner providing marked parking
places adequate to meet City requirements and abatement
of nuisances present on site.
D. Coinmission Uiscussion and Action
o Motion to approve (Popp) .
o Seconded (Ball) .
o Smelser asked about further development in the area.
o Staff described �the probably development of adjacent
site.
o Motion carried.
��:'`
5.3 CONDITIONAL USE cu i�-75 (C.T,.B. Entergrises)
A request to al�.ow warehousing and wholesale distribution
of pet suppliea in an M-4, Industrial Park zon.e, at 8900
SW Burnham ( "Security Storage'') . (Tax map 2S1 2AD, tax
lots 2200 and 2300) .
i
�
A. Staff Report
Read by Powell; pertinent slides were shown of the �
"Security Storage'� project and the applican`t's space.
B. Public Testimony
Proponents: �
a
o Mr. Bratton, applicant, described his proposed �
operation. �
,
o Sakata asked the app�icant about overnight parking. �
i
� Applicant indicated he would comply with whatever ;
requirements the Commission levied. ;i
�
o Steve Mo?inski, representing the developer (Randall
�- Construction Co. ) indieated that they would camply
PC Minu.tes: - 6/17�75 - P�ge 3
�
, . ���,,, ,�7
, ,
�,: �.:;'
with any conditions and that Randall. was attempting
to brin.g the pro jec-G in-to full compliance with
��' Tigard Code. He statec� that steps had been taken
to provide adequate parking and to develop a sign scheme
per previous Commission actions and he explained that
trash collection. was up to the ind9,vidual tenant.
Opponents
None appeared.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval with a condition that 4 parking spaces be pro-
vided and marked �`or C.L.B. and that a11 code requirements
as pointed out in staff report be adher
ed to.
D. Commissian Discussion and Action
o Moved to approve (Ba11} subject to staff recommsnded ;
conditions. �
l
o Seconded (Wakem) . �
o Motion carried. �
�
5.4 CONDITIONAL USE CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco/Charles Dunn)
�r A request to a11ow a car washing machine at the Texaco
Station at 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax map 2S1 36AD, tax
lot 5800) .
A. Staf� Report
Read by Powell; appropria�e slides were shown. $
�1
B. Public Testimony t
�
�
Proponents �
,
�
o Mr. Dunn, the applicant, testified in his own beha�f. ;,
;:
o Lyle Evans, producer of the car wash in guestion, S
testified that the car wash would create little noise, �
no pollution and would create no nuisances. �
i
o Don Williams, E1'bee Mfg. Co. , testified on behalf �
� of the car wash company. `
o Mr. Stanton L. Lenko spoke in favor of the car wash. ;
o Mr. Gerry Snyder spoke in favor of the car wash. '
� Opponents
PC Minutes - 6/17�75 - Page 4
- z�T
o Mro Harold Carlson, a neighbor, spoke in opposition
,�x to the car wash. He said that he lived 150 ft. from �
��;; the car wash site and. that he was opposed to the
noise and air pollution from the additional cars to
be introduced to the rear of the service station by
the presence of the car wash.
o Mr. Bi11 Morrison stated that he represented the
entire neighborhood and that he had been asked to
appear and specify the neighborhood's opposition.
C. Staf_f Recommendation �
Staff r.ecammended approval with conditions:
1. That no portable or A-frame signs are to be located
on the site and all other signs are to be brought
into conformance with Tigard code.
2. There is to be no outside storage or display of
tires or other automobile accessories.
3. Tra.sh and debris is to be confined to the collection
area to the rear of the building, as provided on the
general station plan. •
4. Applicant is to provide and maintain landscaping and
� screening per code requirements.
5. Sight obscuring screening along the west line is to
be replaced and the area to the rear of the service
station is to be neatly landscaped and covered with
appropriate groundcover materials.
i
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Popp questioned the requirement for sight screening
stating that staff should have a more positive
recommendation identifying specif ically where sc�een-
ing should be.
o General discussion of screening requirement fo�lowed.
o Motion to table (Wakem) .
o Seconded (Ball) .
o Motion carried.
5.5 CONDITION.AL USE CU 13-75 (N}ne-T-Nine Towing Service/Gene
Dooley)
A request to a�.�.ow placing an automobile storage area behind
�
PC Minutes - 6/17/75 - page 5
�. ,„,,
, �4
the 'building presently housing the Tigard Library on SW
Main St. (tax rnap 2S1 2AC, tax �ot 1101) .
�^�
� o Staff stated that the applicant'had requ:ested a motion.
to table on the basis t7iat there was an error in the
application and that th:ey needed additional time to
correct that error.
o Porter asked if anyone was in attendance f_or this hearing.
o Mr. Otto Sorb stated that he was present for the hearing.
o Porter asked that the staff report be read.
A. Staff Repor.t
Staff report was read by Powell. Slides of the sight
were available, but not shown.
i
B, Public Testimon.y �
j
Porter asked Mr. Sorg if he had any testimony to enter. �
Mr. Sorg indicated he did not. i
i
o Porter asked for a motion to table. �
�
�.
�,
o M�tion to table (Wakem) �
�
� ; o Seconded (Popp)
o Motion carried.
6. SUBDIVISIONS
6.1 MINOR LAND PARTIT�ON MLP 3-75 (Ler�n Heights #3/J.A. Paterson) �
A request to allow partitioning of a part of lOt 82, L�ron �
Hei hts for a sin le famil home site on SW 116th,
g #3, g , Y �
600 ft. north of Katherine St. (tax lo-t 1200, tax map �
�!:
l.sl 34CD) . t-
,,,
�.
A. Staff Report '�
Staff re ort was read by Powell, as amended, to include �'
P
recommendation to approve in view of additiona� infor- �.
mation submit-ted by applicant prior to the hearing. �
Recommended conditions of approva� were; �
1. A cul-de-sac be provided at the south end of 116th �
Ave. '
2. T1�at the finished floor elevation be not less than !'
164 f t. MSL.
�. ` 3. The foundation and footings be properly engineered
for resistar�ce to erosion and settlement,
PC Minutes - 6/17/75 - page 6
�� , . . �.
. ,. nL1�. Ll' . .
. � � S��•'� . .
B. Public Testimony
�J�" o Mr. J. A. Paterson, app�icant, spoke on behalf of
° his proposed partition.ing and requested that the
Commission not require a cu1-de--sac as he felt it
, was unnecessary. Mr. Paterson indicated he agreed '
with the other provisions requested by staff.
C. Commission Discussion and Action
o Commission discu�sed the need for a cul-de-sac at the
end of 116th and the probability that 116th might
be connected to the north end of the south portion
of llbth, arossing Summer Creek,
o Motion to approve (Smelser) per staff recommended
conditions.
o Seconded (Bal1) with an amendment to staff recommended
condition No. 1. (that a cul-de-sac be provided) to
require the applicant to promote a local irnprovement
district for the purposes of developing said cul-de-
sac, if that amendment would be acceptable to Mr. i
Smelser.
o Sme�.ser indic�ted the amendmen.t was acceptable to him.
o Motion carried (Sakata and Nicoli against) .
�
7. OTHER BUSINESa: None
8. ADJOUR.NMENT: 11:40 p.m.
�e..
PC Minutes - 6/17/75 - p•a�e 7 _
�
� �{
G
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �
CITY OF TIGARD PLANIVING COMMISSION �
. fi
. .. . . � . � . . . . �,
. . .. . . � � � . . � . �;
Notice is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Planning �'',
Commission of the City of Tigard in the Twality Junior High School ¢i
LecturE Room, 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. S�i.d hearings will ;i
occur on June T7, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. and wil.l concern the following: �
,I
o A request by Western Tri-Corporation for conditiond:i u�z ;I
permit to allow warehousing and who�.esale distribution in �'�
an M-4 zone at 9282 SW Tigard Ave. (tax map 2S1 2AB, ta�c ,�
lot 1900) '�I
o A request by C.L.B. En.terprises for a conditional use permit i
to allow warehousing and wholesale distribution of pet supplies �
in an M-4, Tndustrial Park zone, at 8900 SW Burnham"(Security f
Storage") . (tax map 2S1 2AD, tax lots 2200 & 2300) : ;
�
o A request by Charles Dunn for a conditional use permit to allow i
a car washing machinE at the Texaco station at 11465 SW Pacific �
Hwy. (tax map 2S1 361�:�, tax lot 5800) .
i
,
o A request by Gene Dooley of Nine-T-Nine Towing Service to ;
place an automobile storage area behind the building presently
housing the Tigard Library on SW Main St. (tax map �S1 2AC,
tax lot 11.01) .
Al1 persons having an interest in these matters are invited to atten.d
and be heard.
,
�
1
,
i
i
. ,
�
�
Publish �'T June 8, ],975
_ _ , _ ._.. _ - . :,._ ,
. . ,. _.
�.
� _ _ _
. ,
�:J��
.� �, ..q
'��', ;
- �°
Memorandum
2�}e� 5"� �
To: Tigard Planning Commission
From; Dick Bolen
Subject: NPO #2 Rezoning
Date : June �.7, 1975
The rezoning .of NPO #2 was tabled at the J�.n.e 3, 1975, P�anning
Commission meeting due primarily to the testimony given by Dr.
Davis and his attorney, Art Tarlow, that his proper�ty north of
Greenburg Rd. and west of 95th Avenue should retain its present
A-2, multi-family zoning designation. The reasons given for not
changing the zone from A-2 to R-7, as proposed by the NPO #2 Plan, ,
can be summarized as follows:
1. The surrounding properties are developed into primarily ;
multi-family uses. !
�
2. The county has recently approved a zone change to multi- �
family use, permitting 20 units to the acre on property �
to the northwest of the Davis property. j
i
�
3. Due to surrounding deuelopment and increasing traffie �
vo7_umes on Greenburg Rd. , the Davis proper�;y is no t
longer suitable for single family residential use. i
Following the testimony regarding Mr. Davis ' property, the staff ;
��_ was asked to explain why this property is proposed for single family
use on the NPO �2 Plan.
Staff explained that a major objective of the Plan was to
conserve tlle existing single family residential development
in the Greenburg area. Apartments were therefore proposed
to be located on the peri.phery of the s�ngle family area, in �
locations directly accessible to major arterials and shopping.
Tn addition, staff pointed out that this peri�heral lacation E
of mu�.ti-family development would provide a transition of t:
use from the commercial development into the single family areas: ;
The decision now before the Planning Commission is whether the ob- �!:
jectives and criteria used by the Np0 to clefine a boundary between �j
sin.gle family and multi-family areas were appropriately app�.ied to ^
the properties in quesi�ion. The staff sees this property as being �
within an area of transition and is not able to determine clearly, �i
as proposed by Dr. Davis, that this property has been "surrounded" ��
by apartments. There are single family homes to th:e west and north „
and apartmens to the south and east (see attached rnap) . �
It is the staff's opinion that a decision on this matter should �
depend upon the degree to which the surroundings have been con- j
verted to multi-family use. This conversion is certainly in pro- #
gress and it is possib�.e that the time has passed when the Davis �
property can be realistically expected �to be developed i�'�o single : i
� family use. To protect the NPO"s concern about the in��ux of i
,
1
�
. _ .
. . „ :.,, . . ,: . �
� _ . . _-
.�.::'. ,; . .s . :': . `.:.. . .i:. ' - . :�.� ' ..;.., ..:. , ..;. �,: ;,. .-.. ,; �.. �.:'.:� .... _. ..��I
' . . . � . � � �� �. . . . .�.. �� � .. � � ...�
� � . . . . . l,,.m`es�, . ... . . _ ;..,... � ��.
.. . . . �t^. . . � � � . , CZ ,. � � +��
. . . . . . . � .. . � � . . . ' . . . ...�1
. . � � .. . . .. . �� � .. , � . . � .:4,I
1
. . � . � . �� �� . . . . . . . � �� � � , � � . . . � � � � � . i�
�. . � .. � . .. . .. . . . . . . . � �. '. � . . � � � � .�.I
� �� � . ... . . . . . . . � . . � . .. ���'
:i
apartments into the existing single farnily poxti.on of the neigh'bor- ;'
hood, a compromise may be appropriate which would desi�nate this ;
and the adjacent properties east to 95th Ave. �or duplex develop-
ment at the permitted eight dwe3ling units per gross acrE. NPO #2 ;
, plan text Policy #7 states: '
��Within �;he low-densi,ty residential area, dupl.exes will be
allowed on lots less appro�riate for sing�.e family homes, ;
� to include locations at street intersections and as buffers
between mul.ti-family and single fam.�.ly areas. "
An additional issue concerned the county's action in approving a
zone change on a piece of property directly to the north and
west for a hagher density t�an the multi-family density prescribed
by the adopted Tigard Plan. The question arose that if the City's
plans were not going to be honored by the county:, was it possible
that the land in county zon.ing jurisdietion to the north and 'west
would also be rezoned for multi-family use, in spite of Tigard' s
�,,
adopted Plan? The county has been ;written a letter regarding this
' pr�ablem of con�licting plans an.d once again copies of the adopted �'
' City plans (with adopting ordinances) have been forwarded to the
Planning Department in Washington County. At this writing, no
response has been received. In order t'o have some response for
the Commission, this mat-ter was discussed with the county planners
with the foll�wing re:ult. The co�r�ty planning staff assured .us '
{ that at any time a rezoning is considered within the City's p�.anning i'.
area, the City plan is consulted. They stated the unwritten policy
to be one of coordinatin� the City and county plans as much as j
` possible in order that the integrity of neither is jeopardized. �
Zn addition, they informed us that the Tigard-Metzger-Bull Mountain �
P�.an is of top priority on their work schedul.e and suggested that
�:TA work closely over the next few months to see that our separ�te
plans can be properly coordinated. '
�.
� ��.
;
;' a
�
� � �� �
• ;�
;
.
,
�
t,'
�
F �
_ �,
,
� ��� r
k'
• �
� ���� � � � � : � � � � !�
F�
Memo to PC �- June 17, 1975 - page 2 ; �
�
: �
�
� ��;�
. ; . ; � , .
, -
.. _ .
� .,_. . .
r� � v -
r
��,. .: y, �. � .�. �_ :. „ �,... . ..,� `. 'Ti� .K t"
x � 4 b'� 5,7 z k�+� l i:..�"} a i4� �j�� � � 1 ri'f�i�!��y�'r 'C� �4t c�n� T�� 5ti�'�; � ��`t{���-.y,f� f �
'A�`�`-r"�i� �'`pt � � `G�� f f + 1 �, +. a.33f sv'Ir. .� � jC r +4' � �-J.,rr �w�
t'E- T n ?tt i'xrf4::w�rr°� Fr?` .�; t� t- ��., ,� 4..� _ <di.�� dK rn ,.� �9 � x:. 3 r a•i!a t ',' {>,d"��r,ek��s '`t ,��
v " e �, �"` t• N r T t r .�. r �
�� ���: 5 r� �,�t.+��� ^�y ,�.t� it t �ca +j�-,Y ;� �^� ..'� � „±,. 9�'� 1 � �w" .� Y'^•.�°.f t� .
�' ; ;t s r} �.C�^L`�5 t;5 a Y�' 'v..�i� Yi�?..ra'-�, ,� �"'', . .{� 5 + •.• i . Y�g �i'.
rL 4rv'���� .�;n�'MRi' .�T°rv e .� �+^t? 4���0 ��� y i�v t .i,e�� r�(�� t�:�'t . . t� �a} .:-� p Jv6 f�i',".") 7
� h`�r' � "'a,�� 'C ��,�r .Es�a '`t� ��' .r +. e,-.Y �1-`. i �v"� �C^�.s....,� yf}� .�... ��r t � 'k �,'�t+°iu��+.Y`R i �{r ��.„y��t�,�S,��;�,
� -�,1` t
� ��;-
` ,� *`t: t %;" 't� . r, + � �;; '�`� i�.� 1 " i4...' i ��.'� :' �h��'7� J�r ,r � f Y� G.r�yr ��,.;;�� �! �. �,'tw'�S.
'Yi � ,.:Y "' � y - . :.'r .�� � �S��,iA �xs1'}'t� °�. �✓•G 'M�,�
Lr�Ff �'�t � • � �. r.' � !� � 2 �•i ? .r #.��?4��^� �rL '° �� s}Y� y � �� `�y�r � '� a
1 rT �al �3. _. .
'� . '.�c � 1,`j � �i .vF�i `��i � t . k f � J + .1`' 4 ." 5 b'�' � . �� �kr+Ytlr}^� �. ?, yx .,M�
�r .�7 s e S ,.h, .. :x � y e�' �1 :a � t �t � F,Y�N � r
� �i.� • - r ��.�-F -. ��„,�� ` � k ti °'4M 1 ".. c / 't. y-
, � •' '� .A% fv�� 3�r.� �1�. F ,�: . ^. s � y ,f. '1� �'� � �8,y"� ��tA h ,�, ,.
t St�.. r.� 4�. ,,� � � ��•� .=a ' *y } ���� � .;r ..t�Y.. c,� � � ±�Yax'��'s' �i.. ' � �� � � �
} � '.l.�t SW �� i. 1.': � } t .� •I .. ��•'� J.J�r 1 .`.k t 2Z..-1a j�\�F 4 ti • 1 G+'t... � � � � .
�e� :.� � ��. . .. �f. ' � �A't R :; . . ;/ � �y`� N.,i 2 d-�'' '..�+ ft �.s-.t��'r�.. �� '��'t,�'�y.
.., .�i� y {� ��'�yy� ,�.
.�• ! " -• 5�'-, , i+i `..t :''f .Y'�,y �,A.a�ri�.y��� . y } ' � i: j J FiJ tt�E'r. •�
►• i� # }. � � 4��� ,.. „1.�� �:�� ,`' .'F . i'\.`"a- i„r�r,,.r ..vy�°a i, h ..
3 . t� 'l +l � f x� � : C L„4 �.'� .Mr �..{f���a w't�
�i • •�� � �y^ t .A'. � ,� �,'i 1��''' 'V +ia��-+'G�s��'t ��� rR�Y'�y�4�ji(��d:l.'. k r. T �+.,
S ,a •_� � e ;� '� ;, QP y'4 �F
,� d � y h;� �.J ���y , �`U'.L rYt-�% � �'��;j�F�i � �� ' ��fk'�s`4 �j aY�f '� �.
.. !" t • } � ,i,,.. „ 1c Oti ; �.�. -.. ��' d .�3 '
'' ..� c � � , t` F�'S.1;n �r M� �M a �
i .. �� �. 5 � � � � Y �' � -'4�. '�s S � � ri�., '2A'�'� '"^�! -`�
� O . . ,,�.f . � i ,', ��'� ( � ' � � � f � �.5.'-'f n J y Z �-..:°t 'c'z�"�,�.�;
�a� ,;r � .i r J s��,` 6 , a�' i r �. �.:"�s� �
t t :�,��, � . � � `�,�r .k i i ^_� `<� { ;�i c�� ��� '�t. 7 r ,.t`�.,.�.� ��lt.�,f fi7 ����'��,,'.
� \ � 1 �� /� � \ \: a .: �� . �!`r�1 �`�tx�;;.f t F��
� 4
; \� .♦ I�, J S . ���R'� +• �6..t�.�'�f.�'trt..1� � � � �_
f 1�1� , _ �� � ' ' ° ���DA V D ' C G RA N �1*� ° � 3� �+�,�A��.�
� ° �. //`��I� �0 ' ' ;� ' ✓= .�`� � v�c,h.� ' �.t, r �.�`� + '}zg
y • . CY ;.t .A '' t . � f '"+4^r�4 �.i.: YS � .. ��,�-,
� '�f .,/ . . �R , � . . . . \f.'e N`,� ..'fa�71iF�'��
"'. � '' S-W.—l� . _�� t .T ',� M"'fd �1 .I
.L� � . . ,R f .�1. `S J', d � a�WA1�:7y" ''J'..��
. � .t� . , i ' , � . . . i ,�,a; 'fi cr.�4 t}}� �z �." }��^���'6�°'u�k.F :'��
� � '"� �" ., J 0 H t��. ,L•� t� 1 G ��.I:N� D L.,C� 5 4 � ; ��a� ��,
l ,. - . . ' 1{�4 ��! Y' A� �4 1
} � . �U�'_.4 B -.�� �� � � �;h < < ���=1 'n ����T� 'ct'�
� � .� ! . �� . , �. . �� k ' �,�� . > �0 ��t�.��y'`�' k .L�
� ', rr 3 °t ',„,
��` � 2 Ci +' /� „
� �,�.Q '•. >! 1 \ �•�
, � ' r �f" �,,,i''. ., - 1�� , S .� � � ,,'. "� r\J 'S'�,.^�
.. '` .. . _ �.�_� .'�� ,. . . _ .. rr�.. ":� s �� ..'.� ���' ..i� �;'i
� � ' . • . . �r y r� ,r � ..,u, �l�e'y.,:�.:},� O''�,x
. � . � :i ' . . � � ' � 'Ys t �.'�,.t�. .y�l�f ��.., � � ."�
� . ,. _ 1 . :; ' �.Yrv tirr v,��r{° . , , . y , r,,,, �+r
§ f.'ti r�d. � ' �, ��`,� ..i.. 6
� . 4 s. •, ' �pT. , �''c�.< `'�:�,. � �
}', r. �r �; ti , �s
r 'r ,�_�,� ���,� �4� �A�,. .. ���� �`
f � ' !. 4 1 . . �{��?` y t �Y;. �R,�.
'Y � .. . �` ' �i,. �` l ! �• .'�✓�'�,�,fI� . �„�,, ". �Fi�J�r?':� y;
- .. . 1'a t. . ,. d�� i�l �"f'� ��C f 1 �(�3 �4 �
f4 F ��4. . � � . . ' ' �� la . s la��� �������'� ' �,�
� f�� /�ti��� � J � �� y'� '�` '�
,� ' . .�-�� .�. . . , � �,'�`� ..` _ '�. �� , �'S���"F� ��f��l�r� r��
� �y�,4 �\ �µ: � KT `e � t� ����f���,!'�� �� �t? L,���I,�C M F.•' °'�'"14~i.'�� ��Z�'����i
'� T � �i , �•.�,;` . ,• � � -��' � ' " ,�'����:. .
� 4 f� �" ' s t. J�'` 9l .� h. t
r� �, y �'. �`} �' �l. f?G��,tif•fti�y t� ►�,� , ��'f r�i ���f��� ��f
i � ' ,• �} •,n ' ,��'� � � �
t HI . . . ..... � �^�4\ jV yl k(. t` � {�rY
��ir. .'rf . . ��9. .^ �y ;� . :�, � . ���' GR� � `.,�f �_ � ,,y� ,� , ;.s�.
;� Y ` .�NBURG � � �,: �����, � :�,,
� Y � . • i/.,�^' +':� t., f � ,, . y` $ +� � '� � �'q .y �
: R d � ��F' '�ry �.1� d �C�) � � t�� f A „{t��µ��..TV' .i. Y,. � . ' r i7yf�.
.r � . O�� "y �.
� { t :� � � ���► r-r' .��a ., � ��' , t � �'.� � •'�'
� L C ' ((..
�r � �, � _.1 '�,�\ ' I.� �, _ .1 � � X � 1 1'�( 2r .�,J# T ���.t t
� � �� �'. �i� `r=' f Y.�. !
' ���'.
�+ r�� ...Y }`, r ,'i , aYti��� ��s '+ f r ,�4 .,V}rh�`��r }J'j` .>r i Y„{�.� + I,,. l��„ �C��
f > c �'n �� +Yt= Y .,,. r . � 5 ti 1K�*� y
� 'F^ i+ .1! 1 � '' '. '. i 1. h . : � .:-� S �f t t � �
i. '. � r e ' ,.c t .t .. `�'.� .' .Y'�t rr+4k. � n.. •" �.r, � .� ry. '��-(•�`" i {.y.;�'.I
W Y -� � ' -s�- �� '+ ' '� ":1 ��. ?,�,iy .� �' 1 �.�!f . ;{ �� .. � .(�>
� '.@ S.3 +.� � y I�• �, � `', " � � A �,,{ � .�.y'. ." i ��°.' S . ��:.. �qf•,�..ip, Y,�,•� �:.
•� . M : ( � Y . � ,� J , t , i�
, 7 . � � .� I �' � .g
'�, J � �.Y r n . W . 1 • 4 � �- i • t t t � 4 tt5�, d� t� r ti'� �„ i j ri� J
- �. . �.»r3 �:.!y � � S. Slj.t 'v �+ r;
,� �w t. r� �'r W. . ,,• . Z i. � � � 11 .��n "�,.�• ��, �F,;.
.,r,. � ..,� � , �r i,., r ✓ 3 w i7 i iM..��'�� � �:
".�a ,s �.4 . �,�1� � , o x :.� � w.
,k �, � _ � ��, �,ay ,F' C.R, 7 •,tiy—�;
r , t ' � , �, 1� r ��.
i � ..:x .r - � ' � AIC t'u °�.-,�.�c;�f,�..�ry , r�.
. � �. � ���.� r ��,_Wl��.������� �r�. �y, r`..v� 4a J^�''r,C��'{y��
� . .' L �.�. yf, .� ��t•�� �t . . .�A�. ' . . T � �M� ix �"':' + �,
L � .a_� :.v l�"��t j y� �.
r � — � : � ,�~„ �t , .
r , �' � � �h� f Cl '` 'r� . . v� 4 �`r�' +{ . � ((
�c ' i 5 s i .� �� ; ,� ` � u�,r � ���� � ,, r: t �&'��.t t�l�+��i�
1� , �� .� }i ra .. >> � 4 .. . � nw ,J� � �c- � �' � �-
� }.�... � ' `'ra E �+ 4 1 r ���a � . � F1 .7,� 1 7 ., y �r
" � ~ � ..� �, .' � .. :_� � �� j jYr...!T
i t 4 ! Y�'y \ ' ' ��l I+ TZ �
.S ,�1! y,i'ti r . . .i �.�r f-� J . a � rf I�i'I a y t.�Ml }.�..Y'�Yv. G.,
`�•� f i � t{ r'a �•? � � .� r <'s w��y ,.. y � �'. �., } } �-
�t� •4 t� '� � : � v „�f S: f fi.,' 4L +` P' T�'Y i � � � �• .�:':�r�,'.....—.- �
t � �' , .rJ . 7 ,, �;
. , . ; .
i : f„ a � t :,� Y c: �° n :;� j = i4t `�, + ' � ` ti
r ,�. .�� � . �1 \ 4. •::� e �� �. ���/ l i rrl f'.. w q` 1 r�P ..S ,��: •J y� .�•.�
` ti.� � �..t! f �Y S 3 ;t �.. � .1-�,�-i c � 7�' `�, "'���Xi.
� 'A ✓ .. :k� �s � L�L`t.�7 �i: ! z(�
, .. ,!
,� .
ti ��} ' � t ���. ,..};;i t ._s..�y �„ � F•4��. A • J.�Y '' . :``; '� .,' . _i�t,�P. 6i� ��., �
. �
I �
. :. S..r
.. . .�. � � � .. . . . �� -- . , • . �, . .,ti
. •
«:�.. .. �;,. . . -a ...�
� .�. . ,�-. . . . . .. . :..., . . .. ." . . ._ . . .. . . � . - �
• ��
` ,o
. ,�.
, �� � �
� ` .
' � �� � / 4
, ' /
� �/�,
♦ ♦
. ♦ ♦ .,��� . ♦
� � � ��
� �� �,� ♦
♦ r► .♦ �
♦ / �I ♦ �
� � A' �
� A � ', , �
� � �
� � � � . ■
♦ rI .�• �
� ♦ . ♦
♦ w ♦
♦ I I � ♦ .
I .. � ♦ I. � .. �. ,
♦ ♦ a�► �i !M�. � .
I ��► �i ��
. � �
� ♦ �
�
♦ � � `► �►
�� � � • r . � .� o .�
. •. : �• �`i,� � .
♦ , , `�� � ��►���. ,�
�► f � •r
♦ .1�� ��* I �' .�
� ,,�,�������i���� ♦ ►.�Ir /
� '��;�������� � r r ��
� �,u�110�� �j � C,; /
� �`♦ � � s� �/
♦ � I � . �
�,� ��► ♦ : > �,. /��'�
♦� I► ,,. `
. � ♦�► ♦ �
�� � •�
♦
� ♦ ,.� `
r► 0 ► � �� .�
I ��
I ♦ ♦ ♦ �
�� m
�o
I ;.
.. I ��
. �
� ♦
♦♦
m
: , � �'
♦ � •r
I � ♦
, � �► ♦ �
I
�
�, ,
� .
� �s
��� �
I ♦
. 1
, � ,1.�► �
� ��' � � �' . � ,� ,
♦ ♦ �
�� �� I
d �►0 �
♦ �'��� ��,�i�
., , � , .. I� I �
. �' �.. � � �►� ,
. � � �� � r� ���.
� ��� � ♦ �f� �
� � �� : . . � �
�
� �:
4
. . Y '�'�j:� J (;
� � �
�,
�
STAFF REPORT S
Tigard Planning Commission (
�;
Jtzne 7_7, 1975 �
� Agenda Item S.2 !,
�
v
CU 10-75 (Western Tri-Corporation) r
�
Conditional Use
for warehousing and wholesale distribution in an M,4 zone at
g282 SW Tigard Avenue, speci�ically "Atlas Steel Building�'
bay #1 and front offices
Staff Findin_gs
!.
l. Applicant proposes to operate a wholesale showroom and
sales floor, combined with w�rehousing in an existing
vacant space in the "Atlas" building. Number of employees
not indicated.
2. This area is designated industrial on the `.Cigard Compre-
hensive Plan (NPO #2 P�an) and is presently zoned M-4,
Industrial Park.
3. Tigard Avenue, providing access to the site, is prE�sc-ntly
a substandard street with a 40 ft. right-of-way and a `
(, center strip improvement on�y. Improvement of the street �
would take a considerable part of the existin� front yard. I
There are presently no sidewalks here, though a we�l- �
trampled foot path indicates considerable :foot traffic
uses Tigard Avenue.
4. Although there appears to be adequate paved area for parking J
and for truck maneuverin.g and loading, the parking area ,°;�
is generally undei'ined and not indicated on ��site plan��. '�
t
5. Con.siderable outside storage of pallets, building materials,
scrap, and junk litters the site.
;;
6. "Unused" parts of the site such �as the setback area to the
south and unpaved areas to the north and west are in weP:ds
and not maintained. k'
Il
7. Part of the building has apparently been remodeled, but �
not completed. �
�
` 8. Other tenants of the bui�.ding are sma�l �ommercial-industrial ;;
businesses apparently compatible with the kind of business f:
proposed� by the applicant. r
�.
9. Staff notes that proximity to Main St. and scarcity of ' �
comrnercial industrial sites will likely place increasing
� pressures on this site and its neighbors for distributiue ��
and service industriaX use. Given appropriate improvement �
of the access along Tigard Ave. , this is an appropriate area ' ��
for such lases. Site developrnent should� reflect high design �i
standards to complement nearby residential ar�d commercial use:�. �
.
_ �
. . , , .; y : :;: .. ... ..: : _, . .. .
� . _ _ ,
, ��;,;, ,_ � .,;.� .;�.. . .. .._.. . ., . ..___ . ,
::. .. ,: <:. .� .
,
. ��-
' � �,;
-- ` a _..�_. _ _ -
. _. __ � ,
�:_ �\ R± —
z �
� .
\ rn a
� � —
T �� �
�� .
� `��� �
„ .� .� JF.
„ �G '' \ �
� �'c:G.��� S G S•;v
� v
� ����� �
' ,�- �� .�\`�..,�
"`, \ � /� � .�
�` � �� � � �w�J� M� � .���� : � �c�'�
� ` �/ � /., � 5
� /� � t::,:�'����� ^�
!, ��o � / ,�;�;�::,;;�� y ,�
;ilEliti' � �.y
�'S�N �.� � � r;�;;,��,j l`
��� .�i 9c�q
A2 � �
l '�� °�
/
r�
sr�FFT . ��, �� � � cc �
c�Q� \�p, � 'y
s�.
Q,`c� 5 NDI� �
�'� MO�' ,J � �
E'�, /' , �G
2/F � ti
. � y`,�—
.
. ., _ .
� �
. ,.,, ..�. ..
. . . ... .. .. . . .. ... ..,.. ..
. . .. . .. . . _ . : �.� .
... , . ... . .. . �� .'- .. .
. ... . . . . . . . . . . .;i
` � . .. . . � . .. . ,. : .. � . � �... .�.;
._ .. � � . . � .�� �;Q � . . � . � ._: s, ...
� . . � ;� r�
�: ��_. ��
�
�
Tigard Planning Commissa.on
12420 SW Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Proposed conda.t�.onal use permit
for Western Tra.-Corp at 9382 SW Tigard Avenue
Gentlemen:
1. Applicant requests a cond�.ta.onal use permit allowing
Western Tri-Corp. , an �regon Corporation, to use the
build,ing at 9382 SW T�.yard Avenue, located within
an M-4 zone; for warehous�.ng and wholesale distr3but,ion
�� 2. It is the applicant's beli,ef that the reguested usage
pe�m3.t is in conformance with T�.gaard's adopted Comprehensive
Pla�.
3. The applicant bel�eves that the proposed conditional use
permit would benefit the community by increasing the
employment, increasing the tax base, and broadening the
scope of business activity in t�e Tigard area.
4. There have been no changes in condit�.ons that would
justify a change in zone.
5. Because the company will be moving into an existing facil�ty
that fits exactl.y the requirements for its operation, and
because there is, to the best of the applicant's knowledge
no similarly designed and constructed facility within the City,
and because to design and construct a similar fac3lity in the
City would be economically unfeasible and use up more of
Tigard' s already scarce industrial land, the applicant feels
that the proposed location is more suitable than any other +
location within the City presently zoned to allow warehousing
and wholesale distribution. �
.
;
�
. , . �:� �.:.
Tigard Planning CommiSS�on
May 27, 1975
Page TwA
�_
6. The occupancy� and uSe o� th�,s site will have no e£fect ',
on the adjacent properties and adjacent neighborhoods. i
7. No increase or changes �.n publ�.c services would be
necessitated by the proposed condit�.onal use.
In addition, this operat�.on will be in complete conformance with
the zoning ordina�ce requ�.re�ments pextaining to off-street
parking, access and egress, enclosure and signing.
'Very truly yours,
WESTERN TRT-CORP.
�t�.ch Thomas
Controller
�... .
i
�
�
2� :
. __ _,., ,,. , , .
�' ,
.: _ .... �. .; v . . .. . .. , _, .._ . ., . ._. . _.. _, °--
� _ _ _ .., : • .
I , . . • ' �
{ 1 ^ ` '�,....�.'S� .:.���-.--��`"
; • ; w , r �
' Exhibit�t "A�� . � �. , , . . �
. �
�� � . , ' • � , �
. . � . • , . �
. . . . . � • ' ' % ' - ' , -� -i• � � .. �i
. � �r��cF Fr�r� l-V�,��Tl.il� N I�l� I-�;�'� ��� �. , ��
. � �3�2 SW TlGnh�� ��vE. � . � . . �'
; � � � �
� . � , . .� � �;�
, � f - _,
� ., . , ��
�,,
� . �,
.�' ,�
. . . �
I �,`" . , I
� � ' . - � . � . ';
- . �, ) � � . . � '-�i
,,, . . . ���;,�
. . ... .. . . � . . ��
' . . . . � ��
> � � . . . �
. , � � �;�
. . �;
. . . ;�
,`I - . . � . ' . . �;r
i� , . . . . . . ��
�,
� ' . � . , � � �
� . � � , . � � � � �' . .. . . , y
� �0�3�• � �>3 .3�? � F
i . � •! ' � -
l
1 � ' ' .
r j � �
,f • � / � . . . ' ' •' � � .
� �
� , .
i ' � j ' �
.� � , , ' j;
,.� ,. � , ��
� , �-'� . . � . . � �,
� / ' '
� ' 1
` `t � �)l-frJr;t � WAlu'�NCI�/:.L / �°
I
' �0 . �� � ' ' ' � CiAY .�1N�' Cs<�•/ rt<<o � �a
, i � �, ' � • / • '' , . �,
1 � � .
� �� ► � . � �� � �
►� � ' � . � � . . � �
,�
, . � , � � • �
. � � .• . � :� ,. �� . , �;
1 � . � � .
.,.. ��
a ; � � . . . �
n. . �
� ._ . . . � -- > > - . ;_ . , . . � �
:� . . � � . . �
. �, . , . �. � . .�
. . Q
. , . . ;
, .. � , � ���r<,��� , . � � . . � � �
� . . ' , , . . . . . ' ' ' . ;�
. ' � � . . . 1 . .�
, � . . . �
, . ,
. . � � � i
, , ,
. . . �
iwt��r r�����t►��a �w s��� . . . ; �
. � . � � � ��f'� � .�'2'a. ��ti•� �i
�t �',
� � � � �';:.. t
�
[!
STA��F REPORT t';
Tigard Planning Commission
�
June 17, 1.975
Agenda Item �.3
CU 11-75 (C.L.B. Enterprises)
Conditional Use
for warehousing and wholesale distribution o:f pet supplies at
8900 SW Burnham, "Security Storage", units E-30 and F-3Q.
Staff Findin�s
l. An existing conditional use permit for storage will be
extinguished by approval of this conditiona7_ use permit
with respect to the units identified above only. •
2. According to the applicant the maximum employment would
be 3 or 4 persons.
3. Fick up and delivery would apparently be on a daily basis
but generally before ordinary business hours.
4. Adequate parking presently exists on site but is not ,
marked or otherwise identified. Location oF parking does
(, not comply with Tigard Design Review Board approval, but ;:
would be satis�actory if mark�d and ap�ropriately screened. `"
;
5. Adequacy of maneuvering area for truck delive.ries is un- �
known -- parking would conflict with use of the front ��
loading door of unit F-30 were deliveries to be received
by over�-the-road trucks.
6. Owner-lessor of Security Storage has not yet complied with
all approval conditions of the Tigar.d Design Review Board 1'
(SDR 4-74) , one of which provided for a sign design and I
location ��system�' to be developed by the owner for planning
staff approval.
7. Appl.icant is requesting i�.se of two units at an occupancy
of approximately 1 emplo,yee per 470 sq. feet (assuming
_ 4 employees) .
8. Tigard Code would require 4 parking spaces (1 for each
employee on the largest shift) .
;;
9. Tigard Comprehensive Plan (NPO #1) specifies commercial-
industrial uses appropriate in this area. The proposed use ~'I
appears compatible with other uses on the site and with ����
neighboring land use. ;'�
�� i>'I
. 10. Access to the site is from SW Burnham Street which is sub- ,;,�
standard.
��,
i"�
�f'{
: i';�
�
,
_ ;. ,:. ;._ , :. . . .
� ,
� ��
�� �
11. There does not appear to be adequate trash collection
area on the site.
Staff Recommendation '
to be annou.nced after close of public hearing
'I
;
�..
1'C Staff Report - 6/�.7/75 - item �.3 - page 2
�.
.F _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. __. _
� �
�.u
Y • .__ " �, F
�
,`�.
. Zppp �
' . . ' u�o , • Z!0 � I•
, � �
, Z7pp . _
Z . . �
♦ . �Op ' �' Y Y �
,`,` . � • •
, i0 . L0� •
�� 3poo �oo . ,
!� • o r� '
�� . o000000�`000 � .
� � ' o000000
� �� o�o°o°o°o°o°o°o° o ,.
� o00000o Uoo �" 4
� � �'100000000000�0� o,�'� • �
• 1 000000 000' o •
000000 000000 �
0000(�O 0000000
\� ' ' o00000 00000000 ' ,
1 000000 000000000
000000 OOOOOOOQOO �
� 000000 00000000000
J ' 000000 000000000000 ,
/ DO�0o0�0�0�0 DO�O�ODO�ODODODOpODO�U�O - I�
/� o°o°o°o°a°o°o �°�°�°�°�°�°o°o°o°�°o°o . t
/ >0000000 0000000000
0 0��0 0 0 0 00000000000000o Ipp �
I'\ /,� • OOOOOODOO'�:�►�l" ���'����p�p�p�p�� �L d�.I, .
� 000000000 00000000 , Z��
O�O�Op�p�p�p��n0�0�0 DO�O�OQODOp0�0�0 ,
' O O O O O O O 6 �' �O.()OpO�O�OQ0�0�0�' .. _�='x",�,_"�•�_,•�,..,
000000 300
O,�'�,� QO�O�O�O�ODO�O�O��� ;�`-i O O O O O r.11 V Z' ZOO Z t94 L
�DO�����p�p�p�p�0�0�0 O O O��U0�0�0���
��J 0000•000000 00000000 , -
� 0000000000�00000000
D��D��O���p�p�p�0�0�0 O�O�O�������0���
.. O�O�ODOp000�0p000�0 �O�ODO�O�00�0�0� .
/ ' p0�0�0�0�0�000�0 �0�0�00�0�0�0�0� .
70000000 00000000 _
000000000 00000000 , 1,���,�i�,� . ._
0 0 0 °o°�o�o�o°o°o°� s p�c<<fi'c
�2�� °o° o000000 000000a° . ��� 3� M .
0000000 000 . . .
00
• o0000 . . ' � �
a �� .
. •
� ....._ .. _
� -- --
� y
,_.
,.. __ .. _: .. _
� .. _ _ . __
i�' � . �
. ,��
� �
riay 21, 1975
�,
�
T0: CITY OF TIGARD, PLANNING CONA9ISSION
FROM: C.L.B. ENTERPRISES
RE: REQUEST APPLICATION FUR CONDITI0I�AL USE
' TAX LOTS 2200 and 2300, BURNHAM TRACT
In regards to the "Fasano" requirements the following requast is submitted: �
1. An existing project entitled "Security Storage" located in the
Tigard Industrial Park is zoned M-4. One of the conditional uses of
M-4 is for warehousing and wholesale distribution.
We request permissian for the conditional use of Units E-30 and
F-30 as a warehousing and whalesaie distribution site of pet supplies.
2. The reque�ted conditional use zoning is in conformance with the
� City of Tigard's adogted comprehensive plan.
'I 3. There is a need for a wholesale distribution cen�ter for pet ' �
supplies in the Tigard area. �
, ' i
4. There have been no changes in conditions, to our knowledge, that `
�
i would not justify a change in the zoning (conditional use) fox this �
piece of property. The current surrounding land use and street
capacity, and the present sewer and water are adequate to serve the ;
proposed uses. �
�
5. The location for this zoning action is particularly suited for the ��
proposed purpose because it is already developed and is the only �
available space to suit our purposes in the Tigard area. We have a
small operation and it would not be economically feasible to rent a
larger structure. �
k
6. The proposed zoning (conditional use) will have no change in the
adjacent neighborhood and on the adjacent properties. Currently all the
adjacent properties have been developed into industrial and warehouse k
properties and our proposed zoning would not change the current trend �
. of development in this neighborhood. �
i
. I
�..
J
....::. .. :e::�. ._... :.-, . .;��. .. _ . :..::.. ,_.. ....... ., . _., _ ,,,, ...,,. ...w. ._._ . .... _ . _ .. . .. .... __...._ _
� �.. �
. �.. �.
.
T0: CITY OF TIGARD Page 2
FROM C.L.B. ENTERPRISES
�,.
7. Public services would be little affected by the proposed changes
in that water and sewer is already developed. The project, as it
exists, requires normal police and fixe protection. It would require
no school, publi.c transportation or hospital services. Minimal
traffic would result from the change. Therefore, the overall impact
this change would have on public services would be minimum.
This proposed zoning change (Conditional use) would have no adverse impact
on the community.
• Respectfully,
C. L. B. ENTERPRISES
���, � � �vC��`�'�L
�
Cliff U. Braaten
�
�
;
,
j �
�
i i
i
. �
�
i
;
,:
R
;
;
�
-.
�,
,
�,.
�
�
. �I
�" •
: ��:
.
ii
,�, :... . .. ,,. ....... , . ,... . .,.. ....,.. _ . . ..._.. , _ �
. e5
:f� �
.. . � . • � �V Iv:l�� �:
�, � 1
STAFF REPORT
Tigard Planning Commission
�
J'une 17, 1975
Agenda Item 5.4
CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco Car Wash - Charles Dunn)
Conditional Use
for a portable car wash to be installed at Colonial Texaco
(11465 SW Pacific Hwy. )
Staff Findings
1. Colonial Texaco was annexed to the City of Tigard in 1973
and was zoried C-3. A service station is ordinarily a
conditional use in a C-3 zone; however, an existing
conditional use subject to an annexation is annexed as
a permitted use.
2. Land use in the area is highway oriented commercial along
Pacific Hwy. , although a more '�urban arterial commercial��
character is beginning to be evident. The lots behind
the Pacific Hwy. frontage support mixed single family
homes and apartments which here seem to be compatibly
` arranged. A general impression is of a pleasant, well-
maintained, residential area. The site adjacent the ser-
vice station on the west is presently under construction
for two restaurants, "Shakey's Pizza" and "Country Kitchen".
3. The undeveloped area i�. the rear of the site provides an
excellent buffer between the adjacent commercial and resi-
dential uses, but needs to be maintained and perhaps modest-�
ly landscaped.
4. The sight obscuring fencing formerly located near the
property line adjacent "Shakey's" has been taken down.
No informa�ion has been yet received whether the fence or
a suitable sight obscuring hedge will �e replaced.
5. Access to the site appears very good with adequate sight
distances for ingress and egress ,,due to appropriate set�
backs being present. Traffic conflict with the driveway
as located would be expected only during periods of heavy
south bound traffic (evening rush hour) .
6. Proposed carwash (aceording to applicant) may slightly
increase patronage and consequently the t�affic generation
of the station. Applicant states that that could be a
side effect. Patronage is now 200-250 cars per day.
�
.�, , _ _. . ;.. , ... .. J
^ y �4 ��.;,
7. Staff's eva�.uation of the noise added by this instal�ation
is that it is within acceptable limits (simiiar unit at
�T :Barbur and Ca itol H
p ' wy. She�.l Station) .
8. Site proposed is behind existing stati�n building, approxi-
mately 45 ft. from the rear lot line. (It would be a proxi-
mately 60 ft. from the n.earest sin�le family dwelling�.
9. Several existing, al�though comparatively minor vio�ations,
of Tigard code were noted on staff inspection. These were
outside storage and disp�.ay of tires, excessive signs,
illegal "A frame" signs and banners.
10. The Tigard Community Plan designates -the area as "general
commercial" and n.o NPO organization has yet been formed
in 'this area to p�ovide other input.
11. Waste water disposal will be accepted by U.S.A. , but a
sand and grease trap will likely be required.
Staff Recommendation
to be advised after close of public hearing
�._,
i
�
�
I
i
�
: �
� �I
- I
PC Staff Report - June 17, 1975 - item 5.�+ - page 2 ��
_
:; !
�
_
, '�
. i
_ _ _ __ - __ . _ + _
� ?�" � ` ��� , I �
�
, _ .
-- -�� .
,,:. .__
. �'A�+ �•:�
. � r � � ---'"_-_--' .
>
T .�:#?"'`::::;Y. .
. � ��:: 4.�.,..... . '
+ ` .
S � AV �
:.�' I
� �.� -• � — ---- _._..
. I w \ --- _—___..____ ,
: , -�-----�-- _ - � _ ...� � _._ . .__.._..�
fli�~ ' , �
i ' � �sw ��sr � AVEN U
�
� -- "3y �'�
� . J • .
;�_
� � , _I , `�
( r - �
� Wi, 72nd AVE 1 E � � .
� , �
---- ��'�3
, ---- -•-� -�— S
�_ _ I 7
' ' �. �_ j
� - ' =W 74 h I AV . '—�--
` S�1 � TSth AVEN E —�
� I �_. _ •
; � r � . I
. .
� � .
� a —�- —
� ,r
� - �-� •Z � .
; � �, , .
> � ) I q 4 I �
- G : . . . ._. � . �t
� �'
; �._. ._ . _� 1
� � v� _ �
� � ��_� ����
���
` � ' MANUFACTURING
� P.O.Box 1398•Beaverton,Oregon 97005•Phone 64�-0749
�3 �7Z�
r�.y zo, 1975
Tigard P1a.nning Commission "
124�20 S. W. 1�Sain St. ,
Tigard, Oregon 97223
TJear Sirs: � ,
It is a proven fact that pe�ple �rho own automobil.es are responsive
to having their automobile washed pa,rticularly where such service as
car washing is mad�: available to them.
This type service has provsn advantageous when incorporated inta a
service statio.n facility.
It is the intent of this a.��plication to extend the present conditio.n-
al use to include this additional service into this service utation.
It in no way cont'licts w�ith the present operation now existing at this
service station or with the city af Tigard's comprehensive plans for this
location.
�"� There are presently no existi,ng car ia�ashes serving the community at
the North end of the cit�y. This pa.xticular service station� with
its large accessable area w•ould readily accomad.ate such a washing
facility and offer this fine service on a very convenient ba,sis.
The "Swab Bee" Car k1ashing Machine to be i.nstalled here has .no adverse
features that would be contrary ta the adjacent properties, neighbar•�
hoods or the environment. This machine is revolutionary and features
the follotaing advantages:
a. rio high ener�y demand; runs o.n 110 Volts� just plug it i.n.
b. No high water discharge, uses less than 25 Gals. per car.
c. 1`to high noise, the sound is not above voice level during the
washing process.
The appearance of the machine is in harmony �•rith the surrounding ar- '
chitecture and compliments the sexv3.ce station very nicely.
It is believ-ed that only the best interest of th� public is served with
��e���stallation of this machine.
..... ',��
`��I,��t�I3. �vans�����..
EI.LBnE r,ANUFACTURIr1G C0.
�
LP�w
� � � l. .
UrNIFI��► SEW
�RAGE .A.G�I�GY
OF
�� ` WASHINGTON GOUN�'Y � �
ADMINISTRATiON BUIIDING—150 N. FIRST AVENUE
HILLSBGRU, OREGON' 97123
(503) 64E-E621 '
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Joel Wesselman
BUR70N C.WILSON JR.,Chairman May 2�a 1975 Gananl Manap�r
Room 302
V1RGiNIA DAGG
RiCHARD C.NEISL.ER
AAY MILLER .
RQn ROTH
Mr. Don Williams ,
L. B. Manufaeturing
P. 0. Box 1398 ,
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
Dear Mr. Williams:
' SUBJECT: C�E1R. WASH - 11834 S. W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY
In response to your phone inquixy of May 19, 1975, this is to
�`, aav�s� you that the Unified Sewerage Agency has no obj�.ction
to a por�able car wash being installed at 11834 S. W. Pacific
Highway.
The computation of fees will be handled through the city of
! Tigard and the servi.ce billing will be based on water usage,
also through the city of Tigard.
We hope this satisfies your inquiry, and if we can be of further
as.sistance, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
:��
` ��' C� ���.��,.-c.=t.....�
•�:%�-.
Janet Luttrell, Admin. Coordinator I
� Engineering Division �
. �
JL:vr �
cc; City of Tigard �
. . .
�
I
,
, I
i
� I
I
�
�
I
1
I
'
�
;
.__. . _ . , .... , i
• . (i� . ' . , ' �. . r_-.-_._..�.�.��-�� '�. . •H
. ., , . . ' '/: `/ s.. ' .' .."r� � . � � , t` ' ,
_....-�-'�"- . I �.�:
�� � �
. ,�J T.�--_----' � . `
,,` , , � � � ,,
.,� _� T .
C t. r � `��
-.._ ` 3 ;� `,. --_-- �, � ---- -==T--=._.______----�..-_.._.. :.. ___.._;
� .� � .. . , � �I
�
;�i/;�,,{ �i �'D�O�`},�
, . . C,��2 �riAs,� �
. ��,,���. :,� . . y
; ;� �' `
,
_._ �'m��' � � . . .. ............ .�� '^" ;�,.'�iir t���.� �
b (�. f � .. .... :�;,
\ •�.� _ , :�:.:,;�;�ri�'>•'•':;;;:Y::',•i<:;:;��,<:. _;:
,� `� / .
� /
;' ;
\
,
j . I
� �
.._ �..i _. _
G`�
�
.!
n�Si � 1 /• �r :::;f%=:%;:i;;:�:� :;`l� ?�'2� G�cY/..,. :.rl
`V�`�� / �v.: ;::};.��:t:';t;;`;;f:.::::;;::t':'::,;: o.��-c%/1� � �I
� S O �!. > , j
y�� !' �� /' , . . L�v�` / I
`C �F� %I ' , F/4L �✓:'•+� � --- x�x_ .. ��'1 '" � 1
� � ""L J�. I� . . ~_ �7"'an f�{
� 1:� �—,d.c, t3c•rrr) �� � ..� . - • • -- -- �---_..! 1_ _ J, y�:1i
;. \ . . ���..
:�,' . �. „
/� /.J/ ';,.,,_� ��.� . _..- --.. . - . . I• ;� . u"`"-"�
. , .
�� � � . ' . � . � � . . .. ._ , I
` ;� . � � � —_I . ._ . . ;
�;, . _.. ��� , . ,--b --�-�� o .
.� �: , � � � I
jJ,�_�:✓)ar�i�t�r
�( �ruir, ax'i 4,�,+�c:. �� � , �, , ' ',.
�` � V..��1.:.. �'��� __"_ "'._'��', _. �....«._..'_�._
� . � • . "
, , ,' , � ..�_�_..� �. �.. �� ��O . , _� �
� - � 1 �� � �'�--.� p 1
, c� ; � . .��viG� -_�y�=:— I
�
� � _ ._.�_ ..,� .. ._ _�.-.- .- _�.._ . . ;--- -- , �. -
� � — -- — — --..___.—
Q '� • . .. . II . . , . ' i:; ,,;
�, r �
- � l, . ... . � -
. 1 , � tt �I `i � I� ' Go.',� .1�-,,,.�r /�� ,r'" �� .
�t �s) , �f _ ,�.;,:.,�. _"%.In \ .
�_h�i L :
� ypl �i -.. . - - . CcJc°:� f'
. . �. :I.� ' (� �'_ - __�:;--, -
, � , �;��� � _ � � • - ._:-
� d� --�;-;-� --_. . ._.`'�.����'-����{=Lr'E.�} � . �—
� ,
-� �t ---. __. -- _ .... _ r � _
i r�i:-�!v�,���h.-�f' ;� � '
� ' ' � '_Ir�/:/: L'7�... ..�A+`�.. 7..,' ,.N � 7 •i •
i t � �� � .��, � .�•
�i'��it/C,/• ///�X✓i��i� � . �,�i���.�i '__' , -- � �r�' �/ •
_ �
, . f ,' '' _
�./r,-O•j% Co'fcfj ` �•��7 - 'F • ` ,' • -•, •-----' --
j'�/�� �iG.� /n/e�. �
,��u7liri:�i/i"� L��,`�'a��c-�- .
�c:1'D�a . . :'t CC.r;c. .::./c;arl'? '�<� '
ad L3o�/d.rr . �;� �'n� �,���r' �-r T?' ,S, ['.
�/ '�r:Tar W/ ' ,
n k<� �;�:yrris}� . � • • ,
�� #�»� � � �
. _ ____.______ - . .�_ _ ___�_._.. ___.T_ ..________
f.. �.,'5. i �_- .. ,::.•t.
` _3'^� . .... . _. . . . �r/,::�'u l. 1 f-'���� CLjL;:.�;.:::✓� .�..l� % f[.'r . ..., ..
- •y.._ ;. ,Q�;�r,7� /�l f=` �0�7[7 . . .
/
/
d✓L/qh�' • ', : ' ,��=x._�ii�y 7-?/°,��' Btaiik •t; '_` - ' '
� . . . - , � J Gi��a � r-�:��`�•}'�Jfi� ld
` �i�'v%/Sii � � • I �VI,T�/'I GL tL^ d/7�J ��f�
- . .
` . ..� . .
�!`�,s=�'tf�.l��;'
. , � � e�`!�r�!a',rf N t�"'�°�
�� � r�:1�i.�.',.��j��� �
k
STAFF REPORT
Ti�ard P�anning Commission
�P
June 17, 7-975
Agenda Item 5.5
CU 13-'r5 (Nine-T-Nine Towing - Eugene Dooley) �
Conditional Use
for an automobile storage lot to be located behind 12566 SW
Main St. on an unimproved rear portion o� the building site.
Staff Findin�s
l. Auto storage, like all outside storage; is allowed in a
C-3 zone as a cond�.tiona�. use when ��. . .essential or in-
ciden.tal to an.y permitted use ir1 the C-3 zone. . . "
2, An automo'�ile service station (incic�ental repairs) , auto-
rnobi.le repairs, painting and upholstery, automobile and
trailer sa1.e� areas and au�tomobile parts and accessory
sales are all conditionally allowed in a C-3 zone.
3. The site proposed is zoned C-3 and is de�signated �'general�'
commercial'� by the Tigard Comprehensive Plan (NPO #1 Plan) ,
�; excepting that portion in the fl�od plain of Fanno Creek
which is designated ��Greenway" ,
4. The sites genera�.l.y east an.d west of the site on Main St.
are zon.ed C-3 and are in commercial use. The vacant land
to the rear is zoned A-2 on the west side of Fanno Creek
and presently M-4 on the east side.
5. Present use of the site is a commercial building housing
the Tigard Library, a whol.esale book company (Lanson's)
and an auto parts store (Valley Auto Parts) . Total full
time equivalen employment of these combined is approxi-
; mate�y 14 persons. Additionally, there is approximately
2500 sq. ft. o� vacant space in the rear of the building.
The floor area of the building is approximate�y 25,000 sq.
ft. (this figure is scaled of� a map and may be 20 to 30%
off) .
6. A small amount of off-street pa.rking is ava�lable in front '
of the building in the sidewalk and front setback area.
Unpaved drives extend around both sides of the bui7,ding to !
an area in the rear where parking could be possible if !,
suitably developed and maintained. i
. 7. Staff estimates the parking demand of the bui�.ding (assuming '
that 50/ of the gross area of the building is usab�.e office
� and sa�es area and the rest is storage) at somewhere around
30 parking spaces.
".i
_ ....-, , , .
. . , . _ . .. . ,. . .,_ � �. �, . . _. ._ , . . _ .. _ ..�. .
.�
8. There is presently n:o sight obscuring screening to the rear
�r of the site (adjacent trie residential zoned area) .
,
9. The area propo�ed for storage' has been subject to partial
inundatic�n :by high water at f�ood stage on' Fanno Creek.
Exact extent of the higk� water or location of the flood
plane Y�ounc�:ary h�s not been verified although the U. S.
Corps of Engineers fl.00d profile shows the elevation of a ',
100 year flood at the adjac�ent Main St. bridge as 150�
MSL. Tigard's flood plain �district ordinance allows ` �
parking areas, if suitably protected from erosion, in ;
' the flood plain.
;
10. Nine-T-Nine towing presently leases a lot in the rear of !
Knause Chevrolet. At present there are 19 cars in it. !,
:_i
Staff Recommendation '
� �
to be adv�sed after cl_ose of publ'ic hearing.
���:
:,
�
;
;
; I
;
�
,
; ;.
PC 'S�aff Report -- b/�.'7/75 - �agE 2 !
..
;; > ...: _. A. _ _ _. .d_� ..� . .. . .. .. __:. ,.
� ,,�, __" . .....: �.. �.�: . ...
>.... ,.- � _ � � y
� . ' �'
. �� �� ��
��
E,
C
� ,
;
�
�'
!;
.. _ i�
_. ` ,. � ----- •rC
—�N ._. _ .-�--- � l <��� i �
1 �O' �. q�
. I
1 �� o�-
� � � '
sr�, . '�� �� �
FFr . � A�� � � ' �' �:� ;.
� s�y •, /
, ;
_� : �� � { �
,
,�, . �
t�, M�;(-E, , ~ ,, i. . BG i
�'? `�'�\ ti ��
/�c --•��\ ''
��S G�� _ . � �,y ,j"c; ;
� / � ` ��s'►' a�r1�9� ay J
�' �
\ � �
. \ � �
/ Az ;
, �
�"Q:��.�, �
�\`` �`y �� J� /
\, � � P�� / �
� `G �
P`� � \ p � . ' `
� , , �
__ . .... , _�
. . -. .
. -.
.. :
,... . �=
,; .. ,_
---.—�--� ._ , � �---
;
. � ,, , , .e ,. �: � s. _�
, _ � ..
.. . ,_ .., . . _. . ... .. ,_ , , .. . .. .. . .......... „ _ . ... ...
� � .,_:_ �
. �.' �1..
w � , , .... .. .. .�
\ . . 1 . FA..f
�. 164.3 .� ��,�' K 1�J�A PA��ED ,�RKlt�t
. � . � . �,j� ) ,��r . .
J/ii � d •r-'
� i/ � �
� � // tAH. \ � ^
.'�' �52.1 Q �,•
; C. � i ('� \ X \ `
\ /�/ �� \� t51:0 \ � �
�• � . � \ � � � `
, � •\ / \ �`�� • / ,:
P � qy. ,` • � �� _� '��
V
. . � , i/i�y�' \�o
: % •' �'`,/Q`� � �'
,' '� LqNSqy � � �5 Q�
�li � ,\� �p�G /V��, ; , O v
��, � � � �.7�v y'�� ' ,. /40 � �
� ��,) *'� J� j',, 1 0'��,, \ ,
\ � l~ ' �'a. ,/%/ �/; �" .�/�� � E`�
� \ � � �^�`' �` \'n
� � '. � � � .� � -�
��, �- - ., ��:. /��. �,�� '�� � �� �
. � ;`:; ; a P�/ .�, �� _- . �fi. ����.�
�� �",: ;" ;�, ----- ��
� ,� ; � '� f ��.
� \ � ;'i •�' ' `�. .
�
/ � , � i ,1-� , ;: ,
,
. � i '��� "� � � �l
' /�.� � � ; � Ba. .
� ` \ � / ' \\ � 1' � r �~X�
• : p 7R �' � — � � �1 � i -`�� `
\� a HR � � / �..-.�� '
1 J'"" ��/
. ��
� ,\ J
.J :' �4,0�� s
' �,_._... , /
, � ;� \ _�-r I�� � '
� ,
. \ • �
. ;� ��, ^. � �
, �
, . .�
' �\ p . �. � ��� � .
► � . � � .`�"� .
' � . \���`� `�„_�._ .,`` � � � �---{
-•-_.__--- • �'
' j . � �[='�'- 4'•c — '�
, � ' . �
, ��
. ; �;•�
. + � . ; . \ ��
: � �-- � � _ --.-� , -
. .
_ ,
, _ ._
_
\ .. .. . ,,
�:
° �- �� �'i
�� � �� �� � �i�i C� ' �/U�/j!C�� _ �(JC r1"� `C e fi
i �U�(>�SC-� /l� 2�TI�, ��� �r'� .
`�° � fj
� 'I
ty �� `Z�����.�' �1�� t�
. ' �
L� �'
'�
3 C �� ^f C�%i;vr'`, ���=� ��r��=%✓— �,�.�c c�' „�--����.� �a
� ,��''' � �- �i
..� l�'+'��� �'•�� i�� �,:�:/� � ' '�fh/''j�/�/a����.C'��l��-i"� (�,
l�� � f i. C��/`'�' � %l�M/�:'�/ y
/ � �c ���.� �� / � �
' /� �/ / , 1.�
� �; f�j��'S /�;: c:.�'r,i i;���� _ ����SS' �1�/ GC-'if'S� GLi'L G �1� . ,
�, �� , i �
_ � . �, .
�,,� � �. /�' � /�',v �9l.����`��'''flG G!� �-'�v�Cc'� i � �,
�' -
`� ,.
�,1:`�,����-- `..f G� �c''L' �Z�`,�-f� �'-u'•� ;
. ., � '- L-,/J. � �it' ��
Sr, ���� ,o.fj ��Il�2l�,�. G Dcrt" ���,%s ,�:r l�l�Ce ` ;
�( � r J -�u/�i�>`'%�L.�'� � �c}�� ,✓..a +f G��U `I
S��f oc�� � ��'�u��'�-��� � L�f��� �c� � `,
r ��
�'��s S c �'�C' S i j c'S /�.�.��/� I� �i/��fi r�.�7 . 7�'S G l7 L'
,
G�LCr'-� 7�/� �;�-5� �'v1S��-1 c-� �'/��i ,,
( �
�/ ;,
� r i� � J i/ YCl� �/l ��'�/ (✓ r�.
l(�� �,/u �{'0(,'l,'��3 �' ,����;�S � ��.J �✓-L� �!, �-��� . C-' l � ,�
� � . � '1 ;� '� '' �((�«�C l ;s
u,.�: ,
�� ��0 c:��..1'ffi��� � � � ��t.� �S � � �
, .i o ,�. / � i�-'"%�y/L.� � C',. � �t-'r�/.:•r h'�c-.r.- 4
- �' � ' � :a�r� �S (� c.� �i �- ) ,-
�{/�r) ��C � / � l /
�J> �'S� �L �
� ' °�r �� U � � ti� L� � �
��.;-� �j -�Cr��r� ,� �E r �� ��
, , n L�5��,c'_i.c.:� (,�C s s�� ''
Gor�� ��t���q �ti'�us wl � �- , 1�
1 � � � ��
, , , o � J�ES '({G�1�-.� j;
� �.� t�q�N��SE �� G��I��H ��S l� t;
.�,( �'r? . � �c�'c,��(� �Jv. r s .�N�l����- Pi�c..c.' ��=�" r
� ../� , � � � � �
� '•� ���H� C� �v ) .�+�� ��►v� GK—� �.
r �
�
• � � �� (,� �(.�- �U c1 �� �` C,�lS(/�Cc% ..��M �C-(,� cv �i�� f,
c
;� ;
�a �' ,����.� �'2C=� (U n ��'s�b�r�-'C C.� (N �t�' � i��'�� �'�c. J �
w �.
� � �/GC/�Y' �
� �' ~._' � ,• �� �-�-;p�J G1;� �'/��1J�p c% '!`"� ''1
-� � (,.G G�f�t, � C�`c, (.�.� � � , ►i
,� r
. �� r ��'���� �%�� L��u �� r,, �� -�'� ��(-�,�� �v►d vJ c K�s I s ��
� � ��
� ��� ������ �c��,��s ,� = � �,�<<- �"��.=P; �
�
t ce S"5� t,
t
� � �vt��' NlR ���5� �'PxS���'�� �� , ��c.� C� l��''��' �
� � �I � I
��� ,.
� � -- ��.-c,t�'" -��
. ; , ��'
STAFF REPORT
Tigard Plannin.g Commission
��
June 17, 1975
Agenda Item 6.1
MLP 3-75 (L,eron Heights #3/J. A. Pa-tterson)
Minor Land Partitionin�
An application to a7_low partitioning of a part of lot 82,
Leron Heights #3, for a single family home site on SW 116th
Ave. , 600 ft. north of Katherine St. (tax lot 1200, tax map
� lsi 34cD)
Staff Findings
1. "Lot 82, Leron Heights #3" appears to l.ie near�y entirely
within the area of the F].00d P�ain District as defined by
Tigard Ordinance 74-50 and Washington County Public Works
maps titled "F1ood Plain", Washington County, Oregon.
2. The Tigard Community Plan shows the wetlands adjacent
Summer Creek on this site as "greenway'�.
3. Recent flooding has been rec�rded by nei hbors at approxi-
� mately 162 ft. el.evation (mean sea. level�. According to the
�- aerial planime�ric maps developed for the City of Tigard,
the parcel proposed for segregation is nearly entire.ly less
than that elevation.
4. Development within the Summer Creek drainage basin has been
slow recently due to limited line capacity of the existing
sewer and due to the large size and consequently high de-
velopment costs af the remaining developable lands. Since
most of the Summer Creek drainage basin is upstream of this
site, the impact of future development will be felt in the
o i io i in term of hi her over-
area of this prop sed part t n ng s g .
bank flows, increased velocities and shorter peaks.
5. Access to the parcel proposed would be from the northerly
part of 116th, which should terminate in a cul-de-sac rathe.r
than the present dead end ar�angement. Any such street
improvements should be kept above flood levels by a
sufficient height to ensure the aUai�.ability of emergency
access. An alternative cou.l�d be to put 116th th,rough,
crossing Summer Creek. Staff finds this alternative not
acceptable due to the necessity of fil�ing across th�
flood way and due to the potential for increased through
traffic.
6. Public sewer and water service are available to the site.
�
. ��7�,, � . . � . . ."x. . . .
`4, l{�
`�uu... i
� 7. Zoning is R-7, single family x�esidenta�al., and thP Ta.�ard
Cornmuni,ty Plan shows the area as Urban Low Density, with ,
a greenway designation in this particular area as dis-
cussed above.
Staff Recomrriendation
Denial. unless applicant can furnish dacumentary evidence
that the site is not f].00dable.
;
.
�.
� :
PC Staff Regor�t - 6/17�75' - i�tem 6.1 - 'page 2