Planning Commission Packet - 05/06/1975 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
��, �
R
�-,
Agenda
Tigard Planning Commission ;
�x May 6, 1975 - Regular Meeting �
7:3o p.m. i
Twality Junior Hi�h School - lecture room
14650 SW 97th Avenu�, Tigard, Oregon
�
l. CALL TO ORDER '
�
�
2. ROLL CALL
i
,
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES �,
April 15, 1975 regular meeting �,
April 22, �.975 - study session ;
4. PUBLIC HEARING
;i
4.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 2-75
A staff request to approve an ordinance amendment for portions ,;
of Sections 18.40.011 and 18.40.070 pertaining to multiple
family conditional use provisions and the sign provisions in a
Commercial-Professional (C-P) zone. `?
A. Staff Findings ��
�`�- B. Pub�ic Testimony �
;
C. Staff Recommendation
D. Commission Discussion and Action
4.2 Conditional Use CU 7-75 (Randall Construction Co. ) ��'
Fi
A request for multiple conditional uses in an M-4 zone at 8900 �
SW Burnham Street. (Tabled at Apri1 �5, 1975, meeting of the
Planning Commission) ;'
Ei
A. Staff Report `'
B. Public Testimony �'?
C. Staff Recommendation �',
D. Commission Discussion and Action
4.3 Conditiona� Use CU 9 75 (Whit�ker Cabinet Shop) ��i:.,t:,� 5������^�;��
�
,
A reque�t to a11ow a cabinet shop in a C-3 zone at 13565 SW %
�
Pacific Highway '
#°
A. Staff Report `
B. Pub�ic Testimony �
C. Staff Recom.mendation �;
D. Commission Discussion and Action ;
i
�„ 4.4 Variance V 5-75 (Tual�atin Development Go./Willow Brook A�ts. ��.
r�.���a,'�u���, ���';�.�t t��t..��-��,�,;;� i
�, _ _ , . .,,_.. . ..�._,. � _ .... -
FAti
l�-
A request for a variance of CH 18.64 (access and egress) , Tigard
�' Municipal Code, in a proposed apartment deve:lopment in the
"Summerfield Planned Development"
A. Staff Report
B, Public Testimony
C. Staff Recommendation
D. Commission Discussion and Action
5. PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROGRAM - Bonn/Canterbury PD
A request for conceptua�. �eview of a proposed planned develop-
ment to the west of SW 109th and to the south of SW Murdock St.
A. Staff Report
B. Public Testimony
C. Staff Recommendation
D. Commission Discussion and Action
6. OTHER BUSINESS
7. APJOURNMENT
�__
,
�
PC Agenda - May 6, 1975 - page 2
_ _ .,...,.. __, . �:.��_.�.. _..�_.... . _.-�- __--__ _ _
_ . .� __ . �
. _ . . ' .. , . _ , ,
__ __
f k:
� •. . , . /�(�� �.�:vs k. E'.
I ' � C✓"�f""� t �f t .
f, ��
�+ � ��.;. �I
- MTNUTES'
Ti.gard Pl,anning Commi�sion
�` I�ay 6,, 1975 - Regular Meeting ��
l
r;
Twa].ity Junior High School � Lecture Room �;
3,46�0 �, W. g7th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon �;
�,
],. CI�LL TO O�tDER �;
�,.
Chairman Whitt�ker cal7.ed the meeting to prder at 7:30 p.m. �
e{
�. ROLL CALL '
;.
Cqmm3ssionea�s pre�ent: Ba�.l, Hansen, Po�p, Porter, Sakata, ;,
W�kem, Whit�aker. Sta�� represented by Powe11. and C3.ty �
At�orney Anderson. �'
;
G
3,• M�NU�TES � � �
� �����
The m�.nutes o� the April 15, 197�, meet�.ng were considered.
Wakem a$ked that �h�ey be amended �o �Mow that �t �.tem 4.2
he had abstained �nd that item 4,3 had been �abled by a 5
�o � vote. �
G
�he min�,�tes were �heM approved as read. "'
� K,,
CONIldIUNTCATION� �
o Staff asked that the agenda be amended to de�.ete i�ems
4.3 and 4.4.
o Chmn. Whittaker discus$ed �he Coun�il's actions wa.th respec� r
to those revisi,ons of the C-3, G�neral CommeTCial Zone, ;c
r��ommended by the Planning Commission. The Commission '
concensus was to a�k that the additional provisions �;
(separating the Main St. zonin,g from Pacific Hwy. zoning �;
and the 750 ft. distance from schools for high traffic i�
generators) be set for hearing at the ne�t Planning Com- I
m�ssion meeting� �`
�
[;
o Ball mov�d to schedule future hearings for 7:30 instead of =
B:OQ, seconded and carried. t
l;
�;
o Ba11 asked that a City Attorney's opinion be made available ;�
to �he Plannin Commission on the recent court cases of �s
Culvex� v. Dag �Appeals) and Baker v. Milwaukie (Oregon �,
Supx�em+e Cour�t) .
Wh�ttaker directed that a resentation b the Cit A�torr�e �
be agendized for the next meeting. Y Y �
o Staff presentEd a memorandum �xom the Public Warks Dept. �
� to the Planning Gommiss�.on concerni.n�; the U. S. Postal. i.
Service Building now un�.er construction on SW Main St.
. . . .� .... . . . . .. . � . .� . . . . . , � .. ... . .. . . .. . . . � i
" . . . � .. � �f:r . .
�? ��
Staff explained that public works was asking the Commission' s
� recommendation for the improvement of SW Scoffins Stre�t
�:, ad�acent and contiguous to the rear delivery entrance to
the Postal Service Building. Commission discussion centered
on why thig matter had not been previously add�^essed by
public works or the Planning Dept. Staff explained that the
post office had not applied for any review of the project
and the f.irst officia�. contact had recently occurred with
respeet to this p:articular problem. Tkie contact had occurred
when the City had required a street opening permit. Porter
moved to table the matter, directing staff to discuss it
witl� the Postal Service. Second (Wakem) , carried.
. 4. PUBLIC. �iEARINGS
�4.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 2-75
A proposed amendment to Sections 18.04.011 {conditional uses)
and 18.40:070 (signs) in the chapter dealing with the Commercial-
P�ofessi.onal zone.
Co�issioners Wak,em and Ball announced they fel� they had a con-
fli�t` of intere�st and asked the chairman's pertnission to abstain
f�.^om participation in discussion and voting on this amendment.
Chaiz�man Whittaker granted that permission.
�
�w; A. Staff Report �
Powell read staff findings and the proposed text changes �
with an alternate wording of 18.40.�70 (1)(a) . j
I
B. Public Testi�ony �,
o Lynn Wakem (representing Farmers Insurance Corp. )
said that the aompany had studied the proposal and
favored it.
o Bill Flattery (Lincoln Properties) stated that he
felt �he proposed ordinance amendment was still not
f
adequately addressirig Lincoln Properties needs.
o Bi11 McMonagle asked if variances would be necessary
in order for a developer to exercise his options ,
, under paragraphs requiring Design Review Board approval.
o Staff said that variances would not be necessary f.or �
the forseeab�e ro ect. I�I
P �
�
C. Gommi.ssion Disc�assion and Action
� o Sakata moved to adopt as amended..
�,� '' o Seconded by �'opp. Motion carried, Hansen against�
.
PC Minutes - May 6, 1975 - i�ag� 2 ° �,
i
�
�
, � i
� _ „....���yTM� .,�,4..�=.
, ��.. � ^
4.2 Conditional Use CU 7-75 (Randall ConstrLiction)
�.. �
The applicant was not present and this itern was re-ta'bl.ed
to May 20, 1975.
l
5. PREI,IMINARY PLAN AND PROGR.AM
Co.ncept review for Bunn/Bonn/Annand project - previously known '
a Cante'rbur Planned Develo ment - westerl of SW 109th Ave.
� Y P Y
and southerly of SW Murdock St. �:
c
�
A. S�aff Report ;.
�
,
Staff find.ings were read by Powell. �
B. � Applicant's Presentation C
I'
o Jerry Dragoo (Robert Meyers Engineers and Flanners) !
presented the concept plan. He observed that the �.
� developer had considered reactivating the old '�PR'� ��
conditional use but had taken a fresh approach in- ;y
� stead in this application. �
s
o Ken Bunn, a principal in the project outlined the ��
history of the project from the time of its original j'
conception. �
�.. C. Concept Plan Review
o Sakata asked if provision had been or would be made
for play area or public park.
o Porter asked about surrounding zoning and about
existing development and probable future develop- ,
ment around the site.
o Popp asked if the R-7 zone wc�uld all.ow the density
proposede �
�
o Ball asked that a written nar,rative description of �
the project's history, as verbally entered by Mr. �
Bunn, be provid.ed the commission. �
o Sakata asked if the cul-de-sac shown was of legal
length and asked that the prelimina:ry plat be sub-
mitted with the General Plan and Program�
o Ball said that he didn't feel there was sufficient
information about the project or sufficient infor-
mation �n the Comprehensive Plan for this area to
judge conformance with that plan and that he could
not support approval of the '�concept'� involved under
� those circumstances.
PC Minu�tes - May 6, 1.975 - page 3
■� _. _ . . , ._ �.., . __.:
�w,,.; �.:
{ o Moved (Ba11,) to acknowledge the s�.f�iciency a�' th� �'
- applicant's submitted materials, together vvi-th tho�e 1!
additional materials requested by the Comrnission, ��
for public hearing, ,;
o Secorlded (Hansen) , motion carriedo
�
�
6. OTHER BUSINESS I;
o Mr. Bruce Samuelson, representing Bo1es, Maguire and Hoch, `�
architects for the Postal Se�ice building, had not been �
prese
nt when the matter of that building and the Scoffins ��
Street improvements had been brought upa He asked to ex- �
plain the architect's conaern about the matter. N�,
`�
o Chairman Whittaker said the matter had been tabled but that �
�1
it could be reopened. f',
�:;
o Mr. Samuelson said the first four items were reasonable ,i
requests and were already covered by the construction '1
contract, but that #5 (rock and pave area between proposed f'
curb and existing road surface� . e ) was not the contractor's, ��
nor the Postal Service 's responsibility. He said that in ;
a discussion he �ad had with the former PubZic Works Dir. �j
he had been told the grade o� Scoffins Ste would be changed ��
anyway and that they need not pave the areaq r�
�d ` �
o Whittaker asked how large the area in question would be. fi
o Mr. Samuelson replied about 9 feet by 100 feet.
o Bal1. asked for the contr°act provisionso �'
k
o Motion to approve (Popp) Public Works recommendations #1 �
�hrough #4 and refer #5 to the Director of Public Works �
for his actione �;
�
,
o Motion died for lack of second,
�y:
o Motion (Ball) to re�e,r the matter to Cour�.cil with a (�
recommendation that �the public wo.rks recommendations be �
followed. k
�!
o Second (Wakem) �
�
o �arried, Popp againste �
1
t
7. ADJOURNMENT i
The meeting wa� adjourned at 10:30 pomo �
� '.
PC Minutes �- May 6, 1.975 - page 4
,r ...,�: ..,.. :.:, ;. .. . . _., � _ .: _._. . . . .. , _: . .. _. ,. . _ ._ .. _
:_ . . _. _ __.
k.
s
� �( ,
,
�:� ` ,'
4
�`;
�� Addendwn to Exhibit A - ZOA 2-75 �
.: �
I;'
��''
Alternate proposed for wordin.g of 18.40.070 ��
�
(1) (a) There shall be not more than one square foot of sign
area for each one hundred square feet of floor area �
within the building or buildings to be identified. �!
No sign shall exceed fifteen square feet in size
��
unless approved under subparagraphs "C" or '�F'� �'
below. ,
i
� � ��'�
�,
�` . � . . . � . !�'.
�i
.. � � , . . . �.�..
��,�
�`,
�.
, t.
�;'
jz
�!,
t:
�.��� t`t,,.
4{
t�
{S
��
��
�(Y
}{{1
!k
F�'
}���
f{j$
)i,
�1�
{f,
{i':
Y
�3
t,ii
�^M
' �i
�.A
rj'
�
?`'.
1:
i
` �,�
V..���� , . � � �
PC M3.nutes - May 6, 1975 - page 5
�a�, , -- --- '`
, ,
,
�. �
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSTON
i
Notice is hereby given that public hearings wi11 be held by the PLanning Com-
mission of the City of Tigard in the Twality Jtlnior High School Lecture Room,
14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. Said hearings wi11 occur on May 6, 1975,
at 8;00 p.m. and will concern the following:
0
A proposed amendment to Sections 18.40.011 and 18.40.070, Tigard
Muz�icipal Code, pertaining to multi-family conditional use and
sign restrictions in a Commercial-Professional (C-P) zone. (pre-
viously tabled)
i
° A request by Randall Construction Co. , Tnc. to allow mult3.ple con-
ditional uses in an Industrial Park (M-4) zone on a 5.56 acre parcel
at 8900 SW Burnham Street, known as "Security Storage" (tax lots
2200 & 2300, Wash. Co, tax map 2S1 2AD). (previously tabled)
° A request by Lawrence Whitaker to allow a cabinet shop as a conditional
use in a C-3 zone at 13565 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax lot 600, Wash. Co.
tax map 2S1 2CC).
° A request by Tualatin Development Co, to allow a variance of Ch.
18.64 TMC for a 75' walkway access in a proposed apartment develop-
ment on SW Summerfield Drive in the Summer£ield Planned Development
(parts of tax lot 1100 & 2000, Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 10D).
° 1� request for concept review of a Preliminary Plan & Program for a
proposed Planned Development to the west of SW 109th and south of
SW Murdock St. (tax 1ot 8800, Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 lOAD).
A11 persons having an interest in these matters are invited to attend and be
heard.
Publish TT April 27, 1975
, ,
,,.� ,.. , ,.
� �� �1„ �,;�
/1i�-/�'lG� ,
. . �,��
�_' ..
/�� ; T��,� :v�a/�s-� - -����I-13�"
� ,
. - - 7r1 C-���� -��������SF`� ���`'�;��{�� �'��;� � � .
� �,
�� J.�" r'�s�-1G 7� yy! c� /�t7 f4:�'! .� •
/1 y � 7 �
/
�e G/._s, �s��.� �.`��.�e ..�-��c � ..�-�a�a/� ����90
. ��s-� ��r��.�/�c�.���, ��-�/�..s��c�- �rr��pi-o vc�,c�r�
' ���✓/c� . �/� �or7-fY�-rl.�f•��� �v �i �'-CC��-!//''� ^-�
• ' � /
i�'i1�f-? 7�S , �y Ty'� �/,�i;'f�/�'7 d��-t�G 7"4 c�'�f�f-- -
/ � /
r✓!/H� et/,..� 7' Gv!-��� T"'s� � y ��1t7S!'"' �'�/75�j'„�1G��iM�to✓C
J / / /
.,��cs�9 .._.S.Gt�. �..�G...o��S ��/-�� 7�� .�S � r��r��5i r�
,Ca ��E ..�/ �`'� � /.�--.� 1-ot.irr-s�..s�'f' . • : �
�: / � �1 . k
� r.c.ao u/c�G r�c�rr�.s-���v� � 7`r�C -�o��o l.c��s�7� �--��.� -- �
� �
� /r�-�r�� S % �
I�' / / / / l / �
'' /, c:.,X-fG.��/ r�X/S �J�',`� �:-,'/-f� y`0 .� o/r7 7'"" €
I f / / // � t
. . �i.uv (�} ��� .,�,v i--� a 7` � � � � �'D, si�e ,3 ��
il � �
�
�,�t�r�..� �rra,�c��r-�- -y ��-r � �. �
/ /
Z.� .�G= X��hd. �'�...�t./ .5 �"'/srf -�/�Y�t�f.J..P`'-/�C � S C+`' �
• � • • � . r
/-l�Gh? � �O✓G ,, � . . • �
' 3) ���vG�.�e �.r�-✓.s �`'i��� .s'i�'Cw.��� �6�r�-ic�d� �
J �K
� 1 /
�t� 6�C G•tJ C`�'r r� c�� l�/•� .
. ��> Ct�/^, s f'�-�f�.J" �.5'}�'-�/��,�rd �r/v�u/.�y ,.� r ta H ,�
/ � G
�) �c�G/� � �!/� .�f'� � d�..7'":.�JG_.''c.r�1-7 �I--A�O���:
�_ �LlYCJ ��qc�l �r/.a3"%i? /`'0.�� .S�Ll/'T`�� '�,,,," 7�
�-�/ � r�.:�::R:..,.... �
. �/�H C�. r �„� .�.,�*��ti,.-� `.�`-�.i
.,�,�y�, �, .��v�.st�.a �
�.,,.� , _._.. ..,.. . , , _ ... , _...,< ...,... . . ' - . , -
._ : ,
_ _ ,.
G!�Fl��r d+.'A;�,���n�qx� RM1`�'aN� .
fr
4.. �.
May 6, 1975
MEMORANDUM
Tos Planning Commission
From: P].anning Staff
Sub�ect: Consideration of applications for minor land
partitions, ma�or la�nd partitions and su'bdivisions
under Chapter 17, Tigard Municipal. Code.
' A recent question from the Planning Commission dealt with the
propriety af approvi�g Chapter 1? mat�ers without a public
hearing« Staff contacted the City A�torney and was told that,
in his opinion, such matters would not require a public
hearing unless contested. If controversy were to arise, then
a public hearing should be advertised and held.
Regar�iing the xecent memorandum from the City Attorneq to Council,
discussed at the last commission meeting, it was sought only to
clarify what findingsywere germain to the �ssue and who bore
tk�e burden of proof in a contested case.
4
�' _
.
�, .
' hv (+
Tigard Planning Commission
Staff Report
�. May 6, 1975
Agenda Item 4.1. '
ZOA 2-75
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
A. Section 18.40.011, Conditional uses a�lowed in the Commercial-
Professional zone district
Ob jecti-aes:
i
1. to permit development under a conditional use permit of '
multiple family dwel�ings of less than 4 stories
2. to. canform with the objectives of the Tigard Communi�ty
Plan f�r a residential-commercia� area with respect to
housing mixture
Present Ordinance Provisions:
Section 18.40.011 � 3 allows '�medium rise apartment or office
buildings (four stories or above) ��
Proposed amendment:
, �,
- Add to Section 18.40.011 a new subsection: ��Multi-family
Dwelling��, subject to the regulations and site restrictions
of Ch„ 18.24
B. Section 18.40.070, Signs in the Commercial-Professional zone
, district
Objectives:
1) to loosen the restrictions in. the zoning code on signs
in the C-P zone to allow more innovative and effective
methods of signing consistent with good design and the
special needs of intra-metropolitan office districtso �
2) to provide for the special needs of large scale Commercial-
Professional Planned Development Districts with respect
to directional signing particularly
3) to strengthen d.esign control over signs in the C-P zone
Present Ordinance Provisions
18.40.0'70 Signs. (a) There shall be not more than one square
foot of sign area .for each one hundred sq. ft. of floor area within
� the building. The total area of such a sign sha11. not exceed fif-
teen square feet.
_ :
;
;
�, _ , _
..:.�,-�..-..�._ , _. _
' �
(b) No sign shall project ;above the roof line or extend over �
a public sidewa�k or right-of-way. All faces o� signs shal7. be �,
�� parallel to the face of the building upon whicri the sign is located �
and to which the sign,pertains, �
�;
{c) Signs may not be painted, pasted or similarly posted �
direetly on the surfac'e of any wall. �
�i
,
(d) The si may be lighted with indirect lighting. No neon i;
(exposed tubing�, plastic (interior illumination) , blinker, flashing �,�
or animated signs shall be �ermitted. ��
��
{e) No billboards or "incidental use signs" slZall be permitted. �
;
{f) Free-standing s.�gns shall not be permitted in parking lots
or in other areas directly related to public access or to vision
from the street. (Ord. 70-46 �4, �xhibit A (part) , 1970; Ord.
' 70-32 1�156-7, 1970) • �'I
' � ��
�._, �.
i8.4o.070 si�ns:. � '!
( �'
(1) Except:in� Projects Approved Under Provisions of Ch. 18.56:
,,
a. No change. �`
b. No change. t
c. Signs may be painted or otherwise applied directly to �,
�,,, a wa�.l providing such sign is an integral part of �,
building design and approval is obtained for such sign E,
from the Design REView Board. ��
d. No change. s�
e. No change. � . �'
fe Free-standing signs designating a particular pro�ect . i;:'
site or building may be permitted in lieu of Uuilding - �;'
mounted signs subject to specific approval by the '�
,
Design Review Board. �
r,
i`
(2) Signs in a Planned DeveJ.opment District (under provisions �, '.
- of Ch. 18.56) for the specific purpose of site identification, ,�-`
building id�ntification, tenant identification and traffic ""'
�.irection may be permit�ed in such Planned Development ��
District as approved in the General PJ.an (Section 18.56.030) f. �
subject to Design Review Board approval, providing that an � !
inte�rated sign theme is carried out compatib�.e with the tr
overall development arid 'consisterrt with the aPproved �',
General P�.an and Program. �;''
l
{^
�.;
;-;:
�'''
�. s,,'r�
��,;�
�f�
. PC Staff Report - 5�6/75 - item :4.1 - Page 2
_ ��:�
- , , �.
, , ;.,;.
�. ,: . .,,� .,. _,�.._ � . :;w .�,.. �.v.
� ----
.
_.,. . _ _ . _ _
�
�
,� �
�- '�Y=�
Tigard Planning Commission i
Staff Report �
� May 6, �.975
E
� r
Agenda Item 4.2 f
: I
CU 7-75 �
I
i
Conditional Use - Randall Construction Co. ( ��Security Storage��) I
;
� See Attachments
�,,:_
I
� ,
' 'I
I
.,,. .. ::. . :., . . . ,. , .. , . � ,, , �.
.._ � --�----,-
. � ,
F��..
� , E�:
TIGARD PLANNING COMM2SSION
�- Staf� Report
�K; May 6, 1975-
Agenda Item 5
PRELIMINARY PL.AN AND PROGRAM I�i'VIEW
for a proposed P�.anned Development on ��Litt].e Bull Mountain�� to �!
the south and west of SW Murdock and 109th
Applicants
Jerry Bonn, Kenneth Bunn and Jack Annand
Applicants ' Request
"Agreement in principal" with the proposed development conecept.
Staff Findin�s
l. Proposed PD is a replanned portion of a previously-approved
residential project approved in June, 1968, by Washin ton County.
The "Planned Residential" use was, at that time (19�8�, a con-
ditional use allowed in an R-7 zone. The county approved a
� concept plan under the P-R ordinance and the subsequent site
plans did not have to be submitted until construc�tion was at
hand. The project was to include a total of 298 dwelling
units (224 apartment units and 74 town houses) on 19 acres
for a density of 15.68 units per gross acre.
2. While the county's original P-R approval �n.cluded the observation
that the development may take place over a five year period,
several factors lead staff to the belief that the P-R desig-
nation has lapsed:
a. No development has occurred since 1972.
b. Development has not occurred according to the master
plan approved.
c. The proposed development is of an entire�y dif�ferent
character than previous development.
d. The City o� Tigard has approved a Comprehensive Plan,
The Ti�ard Communit.y Plan, which identifies this area
as a transition area from ��Residential-Commercial" to
"Urban Low Density Residential".
3. Actual development to date has occurred on about 11 acres of
the original 19, with 150 dwelling units constructed for a
density (gross) of 13.56 units per acre.
4. This proposal takes the remaining approximately 8 acres and
� adds another .5 acres not ori�inall:y part of the P-R to rnake
an 8.5 acre site.
� „ __.
. .
. .. , .
_ :._ , .
- � _
:
..,:,. , , :;:
I
,: . � , � :
.�-,:.
. . . . . . �, �F . . ., . �. _ . � .,
.. .. . . , . . . . � � . . .. . � . . . . . . . . . . . ... '. . .�. yl
5. Development proposed is to construct 33 duplexes each on
appr.oximatel.y 8000 sq. ft. �ots and one four plex on approxi-- ;�
� mately a 15,000 sq. ft, lot. Overall density would be about �
8 units per acre. All these area projections are very pre- '
�iminary as the plan submitted is of a conceptual nature. 'a
6. The proposed alignment of SW 109th, connecting SW lOgth (in the
o:l�
county) south of the site with the portion constructed as part ��
of the original P-R, appears adequate as it pertains �to the S,j
proposed PD; however, the future street patterns are of major t�
concern to staff. The undeveloped nature of lands to the south ''�
and west of the site, as well as the excessive grades of SW �;I
109th there, and an awkward land ownership pattern contribute �!�I
to staff's concern. '
�
, �.
, 7. The Ti�ard Community Plan specifies that an elementary �.
school and a park site will be developed in the area. ;�
School District 23J has indicated they wil� not like�y ;`,
need a school. site in the area. No public recreation or �'
` park site has been located or acquired to serve the ' ��
immediate neighborhood or the "little Bull Mountain" area. ;;
:;
8. Ch. 18.56.020 requires cer�ain information to be part of
this review and estab.lishes a procedural guideline for `
the Commission's action (see attachment) . k�
�
��. �
� . . . . . ..,.�.41j'
. . � ... .. ((.
1�
f�.
��
�;
�.
N
�
,;
�,
��
�
�
�
. �
��
� �
�
PC Staff Report - 5/6/75 - item 5 - page 2 f'
_ , _ _ .
� .. .. .
�,._ '�,
18. 56. 020 Freliminary development plan and program. � �
�� (a) The applicant shall submit a preliminary development • '
: plan and program to the planning commission. for an approval i
in principle. Such presentation shall consist of a prelimi-
nary plan in schematic fashion and a written program contain-
ing the following elements: ; �
(1) PLAN ELEMENTS:
. (A) Proposed land uses and densities , t
(B) Buil.ding types and intensities, � -"
(C) `Circulation pattern,
� (D) Parks, playgrounds, open spaces , ,
(E) Existing natural features;
(2) PROGRAM ELEM�NTS: i"'
(A) Applicant's market analysis of proposed use, r
(B) Proposed ownership pattern,
(C) Operation and �maintenance proposal, i.e.
Homes Association, c�n��m,;n,�i�m,_ �co-op or other,
(D) Waste disposal facilities ,
• � (E) Lighting,
(F) Water supply, -
(G) Public transportation,
� (Ii) Community. facilities , i.e. schools , libraries�;
. r;
fire prot�ction and shopping, =-'°`�-
' (I) Gen�ral timetable of development, .
(J) Qualif ications of the proposed design team . '
for the preparation of the general plan and �program. The '
� design team shall be designated on the basis of the extent �
and complexity of the planned development and shall consist � . +�
of one or more persons with qualifications such as an urban '4
plalZner, an architect, an engineer, a landscape architect, a !7;
designer, an attorney or other similar professionals or techni- �;
. �iF
cians. _ t�',
� (b) The planning commission shall informally review the � i �
preliminary development plan and program and may act to grant
� preliminary approval, approval with recommended modifications �
or denial. Such action shall be based upon the comprehensive
�•
'� plan, the standards of this title and other regulations and ;;'
t'� the suitability of the propos�d dev�lonment in relation to • ��
the character of the area. '{
�-�7 (c) Approval in principle of the preliminary develop-, ;
m�nt plan and program shall be limited to the preliminary ��
acceptability of the land uses proposed and their inter-re-
lationships and shall not be construed �to endorse precise
location of uses nor enr�ineering feasibility. The planning '�
commission may require the development of other information I��
��
than that specified in Section 18. 56 .030 to be submitted with };
the g�neral development plan and program. . ;:;.
(d) The planning commission shall review and �may recom- �
mend �xpansion, additions or modificai:i�ons in the qualifi.ca- �"�
tions of the proposed d�sign team for the preparation of the ��`'
general plan and program. i'��
� (e) The planning commission shall determine the extent, `�
�';
of any additional market analysis to be included in the gen- - ���
I :;
eral dev�lopment plan and program. (Ord. 71-4 §4, Exhibit A R�:�
(part) , 1971 : Ord. 70-32 §185-2. 1, 1970) . '4i�r
. , ���,
- i:,,y�
.
� 'y _ � � I
a r.��.,G_ � -.�:s '.�^..-x- _ � � /'�J / .i" ,�� � � 3 .
:,--- —:.��.. �� -�-`A --- =} _ .,� � ! i'�'�//,,
y y/-�yA� F'� '���K� � .�
� `� �3� �'t,; � a ` 4
1 � �
r' \ �
_.� .
� ..� �, ____.. _ :,..�% /
� � � � , ' ',�
'�'\�- ---------_.__i_____"_•-�._..r-� \ ,-- "�_���-t', `�-`��%
� � . ._ � �._.._,, '�' �
iG....,h \\ �596 '�\ iLw-+�s �
�� �-.-.._._ ���� � X -1't��� _�_rl
�--I - r--� -�;K G 6 \ ��
-__ __�
��:;� � __�1_-- — ---�---— _ , � I _� �
�-,_ - _ _ , � . �,. ,-- , � ; ,� ,r .,�
.,� ._, a`na�c,� :. � � . r
;:%,, _ _�\ � _==�-- _-%' �. ,� -�; =�-�� J ; ,
� � - „� �,;.��— ,, i F F
'" - '�`` - — � `` ' ' �- � '� •,��\�, � '-'-=--''--' ' ..�
''� !- � - -�� s`
/ r I•l- � �--, --� �..i �i�---�\�'��� '� .�� �� � / � �"'�
/'� --`=-''�-- �'�\ ��_----'.'�=,.��., '�s.,��,�p Ili ` �^
/`����-t-=-•-+•'—•�`,��-•� �i=-` �\` ��,piY4 "� '''_��V:__-.-. � ��.�' f� -
% , � l-'�y�-__---, � . � - `
� �t-�� ;;----y-. ,- �;� \. --z,.._ ; ; � .��.",�
.',-'ti ,r ��•���,�'�� �7,v."�F! '.�� ��� r . � `Yau;�t - `�'! �
f
,�,-- i �'_� s �� � , - {',/, ��1__�.
yY�, ,—� -:� � � � t�, `=�=-�--- f' �� -.�:
j � i ' �R � �� ����P A R K I IJ G`--�---�,--,� �.
y �1, r.�`" p ✓i IJ� i
�/3/,'r '` �� ,i +' � - � -__ =�� .�1 `+-4.x�i:-.,J .-,�;''�'_ L��_._�
l \ I��� --- -------- " �-\•`-f'---� � —�._^--
��) �I �i I ``� 1 ._,"-
;I_ - - f } l�'' ,.. ,Z...,� � ,�,..�� � �� � i
, _
..
.
,
; .. ,r'� "� - _'t._.__-'.
;
_ ._- � — 'T� J y---__ / �c
r ...-- _ �
I
, ,�_._.__ - — � -f "- � -'� ' 1—
� i�, � - -----M: U R C 0 C I< ? L ( //__�" _
r I � '� l ` ----- ' ��. -�
k� f , , �� ----�----�,_� _ — - - // ��
�
/ , ,'—` �, — —�=�' � �. —_ —: ____-=-�'
� .,G�---_ ._.
� — _-� � � _�a`- , r ,
<, ,: , W , / �._ �--� �. __._
' � / > �� '"� ...�. i ti'/��+�,-�.,e.��'T __J . _- '" _ � 1�.
( � //� '�'h .I .... � —�_Y�—__-.—_ __.—,-._-.' /
� � f .�.r.� � � 1' \\�—__ . .�.,.__ , I ` .
i �� ^ �_
��� 1[I� .� �.��i � 5��� ��"-//- \ j `�\�\ ( i\ l� •-_1 i ..
�_ k I i' .\\ � � ��
/ I •� ���-' `_\� \ 'c \` !�'� , i i;,\V� �-
� I- %, �� � . \j'+. 4, � ��� � �. i �
t I � � �I �i_�~ -- � � \ \� �� .�� 1 �. , �'� .- .-- '.
I1 0 � �\.� ��-�� 4� �` `�'_ --�
, � �� ,,I ��-._:._�_
4• �,% `� .�IJ.11 '/�
�'� � \f� �� -�_ �i� �� ti i�
p 1 I _ '� I� F -�i'' :i�'�--�_ 1'�t ,` �.1 I r--ti-L,�
A ti t � � �� /; I(� f. �_I � � '`�
� f
� � y�� 1 \ ��,� -
1{ � I cn I� :\2�8 5 �/���} aw�s , 'r f L,R K I N G ���} j�_� �.
t� I 'i�\X__._._ _ �__..__�T- �-� `-_-_, ����1 C -' � ,'
r � ..._... - " -- -- f � �'�,
�/ 1 i __.� . ._ --- -- _ _ .
I ,, . I - � ..:. ..,� r---- -- > --- - .. - � __ ---------.__`_ -_ -
. � - - .-.._..-----'_- � -
� M H ��I
1�Q'�Y I I O��'N --- � �� M.U R 1,U C k G �f � i _
1
� �' - - i- - �=� �
GA� P� I :t o vx L4 \� / , -�" --jt-�! �� �� '-�f� ���l l��
'2 G 5 �-
; ;'
I ; � /� �, /� �ak«u,� , �r,..,� % __._ I 1 �� ,
(�} �` _ J (� , `✓ ��,// �.�-r�---�-��','� � .,,'�s �J � �
; : �F \:,-`__ ,� _ -,1 0� �o� �- Z
t. � � /,/� �__. �� C-.`� L: �
I � ti . f i ��/ �Zu�` � _-----_ ��'`� I 8�..,�� � ; �
�I /V /� � `
I� �I ; � � ;, � : = j� � ���� �, �--___. I� j �
� ,� / �_4 2 8 3_� j� I
- ,�� � ,
-. �� �� J � i
: \\ _� � -_ _._— _--
\ �j _-- x -- -
__f�-_ _ __. _X .
--.
- -- - --- ��.\ (
� I � �,
,�` � �..� ` �; 4 2 I S � I t �
- � ____._ �
\ ..,��.,� --�-1� 1
I�`,�,��(4�6 25 ��. , '
,� 1 � q-,�
_ _ _ ._
� I ` \ . � ` \'� --------" � y�
,�. I`Z' I _ : _. �� \\. �
- �� /.v,.,_ ^^'r�-,� _r.,..,...,�_.f.
� 1 .�-„ `-"-''-_'"�---- 'z,�
,``' ^"w �� �J ^-l. �
�,,._��.`'�\-. ��`�/�L�-L.��`� --- ---_____ �
�� � ��` � L -___-.-_ �-_. I
�'` ._ S',-�',`. � j� i
,.,
�
-� �
..
--., --� - -- �
\� � _
. � . --_. _ —
, _� ` __ _ _ ___- /�%, �
--_ ��` � � `- - ��o ___—___----' � ,�
� . �.� � �,.`��- -,.. _ _ . ..--- __. _ .I , - '
\� • • -
� .._ �
� �`. � ,. _.
� , _.. .. .. ._ ._
� �� , . . ._ . ._
,�. ___
, ,, _ _ ._ ��
_ _
^y�_-\ �, ` , _ . _ _ ,
,� "\�\�� , `''' �� �\ `. Fp� . � � � � �
��,�-�\ � p �- ' _ _ ��__.
. __
� , ;� \;���C,o�e�� �� �
.. �