Loading...
Planning Commission Packet - 11/19/1974 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. AGENDA Tigard Planning Commission `'' Regular Meeting, November 19, 1974 Twality Junior High School - lecture Room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.1 Meeting of November 5, 1974 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Conditional Use 4.1 CU 11-74 (John Setniker Auto Repair) Request by John Setniker for a conditional use permit to operate an automotive repair garage in the C-3, General Commercial zone on property located at 13340 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 2S1 2CB, tax lot 2000) . 4.2 CU 12-74 (American Legion Post 158) Request by American Legion Post No. 158 for a conditional use permit to operate a lodge facility in the C-3, General Commercial zone on property located at 13620 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 2S1 2CC, tax lot 900) . 5. MINOR LAND PARTITIONING 5.1 MLP 8-74 (Country Kitchen - Shakey's Pizza) Request to partition property located at the intersection of S. W. 69th Street and Pacific Highway on the north-east corner to provide two parcels to separate restaurant facilities (tax map lSl 36AD, tax lot 4300) . 6. OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT �. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION NoveMber 19,' 1974 Twality Junior High School - lecture room 14650 S. W. 97th Street, Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER A. The meetingwas called to order at 7:35 p.m. • 2. ROLL CALL • A. Members present: Hartman, Nicoli, Popp , $akata, Barkhurst, Chairman Whittaker, City Attorney Anderson, City Planner Bolen • B. Members absent: Ball, Hansen 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. The minutes of the November 5, 1974, meeting were approved as submitted. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Conditional Use (- 4.1 CU 11-74 (John Setniker Auto Repair) Request by John Setniker for a conditional use permit to operate an automotive repair garage in the C-3, General Commercial zone on property located at 13340 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 2Sl, tax lot 2000) . • A. Staff Findings • 1. Bolen presented the staff findings which, in summary, described the project proposed by the applicant and stated that the proposal does not conform to the adopted plan for the area. B. Testimony and Cross Examination 1. John Setniker, the applicant, described his operation to the Planning Commission stating that he would be operating an automotive repair garage and added that the gasoline pump shown on the site plan would be for his own use only. 2. Wes Hycey of S. W. 103rd Street said that he had been a customer of Setniker's for 20 years and thought (_ the request should be approved. In addition, he added PC Minutes-,November '19 , 1974 - page 1 . • that the notice which was distributed stated the meeting time as beginning at 8:00 and the Planning Commission should have held to this notice time rather than start at 7:30. 3. Chuck Stearns of S. W. School Street said that Mr. Setniker should be allowed to continue his business on the proposed parcel, 4. Fred Olson, a property owner nearby on Pacific High- way said that he believes the business should be allowed at this new location. 5, Gordon Moore said that he agreed with statements made by previous proponents. C. Staff Recommendation 1. Bolen recommended denial of the request based on the staff findings which included that the request does not conform to the adopted NPO #1 Plan and that the street system as it exists is not sufficient to handle increased commercial traffic loads. D. Commission Discussion and Action 1, Hartman asked Bolen to show on the applicant's site development plan where the new frontage road would be located. Bolen showed the road and pointed out that it would pass to the rear of the proposed building site. 2. Nicoli asked the City Attorney if this use could be postponed until the frontage road were constructe4, The City Attorney replied that the City could not freeze development of this land based upon a court decision concerning the City of Salem. He referred to this as the "Salem Freeze Case". 3. Whittaker stated his concern over the fact that the proposed use does not conform to a publicly adopted plan. 4. Barkhurst stated his belief that the existing frontage road is not adequate to serve commercial development and the change in use of this property from residential to commercial use should be made with provision for the frontage road shown in the NPO #1 plan, 5. Popp asked if the future frontage road could serve this parcel. Bolen said yes, it would traverse the rear of this parcel. PC Minutes -November 19, 1974 - page 2 6. Popp moved to approve the conditional use based upon the finding that it would not violate the NPO #1 plan and that a community need has been demonstrated. In addition he included that a towing operation could be part of the approved use. Nicoli seconded the motion. 7. Barkhurst said that he could not vote for the motion in that the burden of proof lies with the applicant to convince the Planning Commission of the conformance ofihis proposal with the comprehensive plan as well as the other questions raised by Fasano. He said that, in his opinion, this has not been done by the applicant. 8. Nicoli stated his belief that the requested use could create less traffic than anything else that could go on the site. 9. Hartman abstained, stating he had discussed this matter with the applicant previous to the hearing. 10. Whittaker said he found it unfortunate that the NPO had not commented on this item before the Planning Commission's consideration. He said there were two questions which concerned him: conformance with the adopted plan and the question of whether or not there were other more suitable sites located in the vicinity. He was impressed with the sentiment demonstrated by the patrons of Mr. Setniker in the hearing, but said he could not overlook his commitment to good land use planning. 11. Nicoli stated his belief that there were no other sites available in the area. 12. Sakata stated that this was a difficult decision to make because of the testimony given in support of Mr. ' Setniker's request, but that the Planning Commission must examine the burden of proof presented by the applicant. 13. The Planning Commission voted on this item and it passed by a majority vote with Hartman abstaining and Barkhurst and Whittaker voting no and Popp, { Nicoli and Sakata voting yes. 4.2 CU 12-74 (American Legion Post 158) Request by American Legion Post No. 158 for a conditional use permit to operate a lodge facility in the C-3, General Commercial zone on property located at 13620 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 2S1 2CC, tax lot 900) . PC Minutes -November 191 1974 - page 3 A. Staff Findings) 1, Bolen presented the findings, the most significant of which p ointed out conformance with the existing adopted plan for the area and that this site would be a more suitable location than the site presently being used by the Legion on 72nd and the frontage road. { B. Testimony and Cross Examination 1. Jim Roundtree, the realtor handling the sale of this property, presented the Legion's proposal for use of this property, , 2. Arnie Fisher, a member of the Post, said that the ;! Legion intends to make this site a show place. He continued by saying that the existing site on 72nd does not have adequate parking and is creating traffic , congestion in that area. 9 C. Staff Recommendation 1. Bolen recommended approval of the applicant's request with the condition that some form of screening be pro- vided on the site of the property facing the Camelia 1 Apartments and that a detailed site plan be submitted conforming to City code requirements. D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Popp moved to approve the request based upon the finding that it conforms with the adopted NPO #1 Plan and with the condition that a site development plan be sub- mitted to the staff for their approval which conforms to the standards of the site development ordinance and which shows provision for drainage. Hartman seconded and the motion passed by a unanimous vote of the commission present. 1; 5. MINOR LAND PARTITIONING ;i 5.1 MLP 8-74 (Country Kitchen/Shakey's Pizza) , Request to partition property located at the intersection of i S. W. 69th Street and Pacific Highway on the northeast corner i' to provide two parcels to separate restaurant facilities, (tax map 151 36AD, tax lot 4300) . A. Staff Findings 1. Bolen presented the staff findings relevant to this case. PC Minutes -Noveppber 19, 1974 - page 4 i 1 1 B. Testimony and Cross Examination 1. Carl Anderson of Coldwell-Banker explained the proposal to the Planning Commission. C. Staff Recommendation 1. Bolen recommended approval of the submitted plan with the following conditions: a) that the applicant submit joint access and parking agreements b) that the storm drainage on the 69th Avenue side be located in the public right-of-way c) that 69th Avenue be improved with a half street improvement d) that the two access drives now existing on Pacific Highway be removed and replaced with curbs and a sidewalk D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Barkhurst moved to approve the requested Minor Land Partitioning based upon the staff findings and according to the staff recommended conditions. Hartman seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council Commission present. 2. Hartman made a motion to modify the approval as regards the required street improvement for 69th. He moved that storm drainage be the only improvement required on the 69th Street. Popp seconded and the motion passed by majority vote. 6. OTHER BUSINESS - Sign Code Appeal SCA 7-74 (Country Kitchen - 69th & Pacific Highway) A, Staff Findings 1. Bolen stated that the parceling of this property would reduce the allowable sign area for the Country Kitchen Restaurant and they state that a hardship would thereby be created. B. Testimony and Cross Examination 1. Carl Anderson of Coldwell-Banker stated that the smallest sign produced by the company is what they are proposing for this site which has a total of 420 sc. feet. He PC Minutes. -NoVeMber,°19, 1974 - page 5 J 4 said that it would present a hardship for the company not to be able to use their standard sign. C. Staff Recommendation 1. Bolen said that the lot frontage would allow a sign larger than many already existing on the highway and in his judgment a sufficient hardship did not exist to justify the granting of a variance from the sign code. D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Barkhurst moved for denial of the variance request in that no hardship has been established. In addition he stated that allowing the variance would be granting a special advantage over other similarly situated properties. Nicoli seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote of the commission present. 7. ADJOURNMENT A. The meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. • (. PC Minutes - November 19, 1974 - page 6 Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report November 19, 1974 Agenda Item 4.1 CU 11-74 (Setniker Auto Repair) Applicant John Setniker Applicant's Request Request for a conditional use in the C-3, General Commercial zone, to construct an automotive repair garage. Property is located at 13340 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 251 2CB, tax lot 2000) . Staff Findings. 1. Properties to the north, south and west are currently zoned C-3, General Commercial, and the property to the east, which lies behind Pacific Highway, is currently zoned R-7, single family residential. 2. The applicant's property presently contains a single family dwelling and the proposed automotive repair garage would be ,_, placed adjacent the dwelling on the same tax lot. The dwelling is a rental unit and the owner of the auto repair will not be residing there. 3. Surrounding land uses consist of the following: a) To the north an existing house which will be approxi- mately 13 feet from the proposed repair garage and a small one-chair barber shop which sits in front of this house adjacent the frontage road. b) To the east and rear of the property is a single family subdivision which is well-screened from the proposed project by a thick growth of trees and related vege- tation along the drainage way. c) The property to the south contains a house which has been converted to a business selling craft items. Across Pacific Highway is a large vacant parcel and the Shell Service Station presently being operated by the applicant. 4. Access to the property is provided by means of a frontage road which was formerly Pacific Highway. This access is adequate to serve the existing uses which are primarily residential in nature, but improved access will be necessary as commercial development of these properties takes place. R x The adopted NPO #1 Plan proposes a recessed frontage road to serve the parcels presently accessing onto the frontage road. This proposal would entail a vacating of the existing frontage road and, in effect, move it to the rear of the affected properties, with a connection into Garrett Street. 5. The applicant's request does not conform to the adopted NPO #1 Plan. This property is shown on the Plan for Commercial-Professional development and is scheduled for rezoning to a conforming zone in January of 1975, accord- ing to the current Planning Department work schedule. By proposing non-retail types of commercial use in this relatively undeveloped portion of Pacific Highway, the Neighborhood Plan is attempting to alleviate the strip commercial development pattern which now exists on other portions of the highway. 6. Since +he plan was adopted in May of 1974, no substantial change, in the sr.:rounding conditions has occurred. 7. The applicant has not submitted evidence to the staff according to the Supreme Court Fasano Decision; however, the applicant has stated to the staff that a community need does exist for his use as is evidenced by his many years of successful operation across the street. 8. The staff has questioned the applicant concerning other more suitable locations for the proposed use and he has stated that he has not searched for other property and that his preference is to use this property which he presently y owns. 9. Minimal adverse effects would be created for adjoining properties with the exception of the house located to the north. An additional concern with respect to this dwelling unit is the fact that the applicant proposes burying a 2,000 gallon gasoline tank and placing a pump in front of his proposed building adjacent the northerly property line. 10. The applicant's proposal will not have an adverse impact upon public services, with the exception of the street system. As previously mentioned, this property is served from an abandoned alignment of Pacific Highway, which is not adequate to serve commercial volumes of traffic, especially if the applicant plans to sell gasoline and, in effect, operate a service station facility from this location. 11. The applicant presently is operating the Shell Service Station located across the street from the subject parcel at the intersection of Park St. and Pacific Highway. His business there consists of selling gasoline, automobile PC Staff Report - November 19, 1974 - page 2 - Item 4.1 parts and providing general automotive repairs. He also operates a towing business from this site and vehicles are often stored on it for short periods of time. It is the staff's impression that the applicant wishes to operate basically the same type of business on the pro- posed site. His lease with Shell Oil Co. expires in a short period of time and it has therefore become necessary for him to find another location for his busi- ness. 12. A site development plan has been submitted to the staff which shows a repair garage building with a parking lot in the front and a gasoline pump in front on the northern side. This site plan does not propose a storage area for vehicles towed in by the applicant. Staff Recommendation Staff recommendation will be given following the receipt of evidence at the public hearing. I l l 1 t, i { L4 li 1i t d i PC Staff Report November 19, 1974 - page 3 — Item 4.1 ti Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report November 19, 1974 Agenda Item 4.2 CU 12-74 Applicant American Legion Post 158 Applicant's Request Request for a conditional use permit to operate a lodge facility in the C-3, General Commercial zone, on property located at 13620 S. W. Pacific Highway (tax map 2S1 2CC, tax lot 900) . Staff Findings 1. The subject property is zoned C-3, General Commercial, and the surrounding properties are also zoned C-3. 2. The subject property presently contains a church structure which has been remodeled as a funeral home. The property to the north supports the Heinz Volkswagen Repair Garage and the property to the south contains the Camella Apart- ments. The property to the east contains a single family dwelling with an open field behind. Across Pacific High- way, to the west, is a vacant parcel and a house at the intersection of Watkins and Pacific Highway. 3. The applicant has submitted a response to the Fasano questions which are included in the Commissioners ' packets. 4. In regard to the request's conformance with the comprehensive plan, the staff makes the following findings. The compre- hensive plan, in this case NPO #1, proposes that this land be used for commercial-professional purposes. Essentially, this means non-retail types of commercial development. The staff finds that a fraternal lodge, such as that being proposed, would be within the realm of the uses proposed by the Plan. The Legion's existing Tigard facility is on 72nd and the frontage road of Pacific Highway. This facility is too ! 'I small to serve their purposes and the lack of off-street parking has resulted in a considerable amount of parking on the street and traffic congestion in this area. To relocate their facility at this location with no provision for off-street parking will benefit the community. 5. The proposed use does fill a community need as evidenced by r the overload at the existing facility on 72nd. 6. The applicant states that this site has been chosen after many months of searching for another location for their membership. They state that other buildings have been found, but there are problems relating to zoning, parking or building useability. 7. In consideration of adverse effects upon adjoining proper- ties, the staff finds that the only potential for conflict exists between the proposed use and the apartment building to the south. Conflicts could arise from evening functions at the lodge with late hour departures. Staff Recommendation Staff recommendation will be given following the receipt of evidence at the public hearing. li li fb� PC Staff Report - November 19, 1974 - page 2 - Item 4.2 Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report November 19, 1974 Agenda Item 5.1 MLP 8-74 Applicant Country Kitchen - Shakey's Pizza Applicant's Request Applicants wish to partition property located at the inter- section of S. W. 69th and Pacific Highway on the northeast corner in order to provide two parcels for separate restaurant facilities. (tax map 1S1 36AD, tax lot 4300) . Staff Findings 1. The site is presently vacant and comprises approximately one acre. The zoning is C-3, General Commercial, and the two restaurants proposed for this site are permitted uses. 2. The Tigard Community Plan designates subject site appropriate for. general commercial development, said plan stating, "The development of individual properties in these areas should �' take into account the traffic, safety and visual problems associated with strip commercial development. " 3. One access point is proposed from Pacific Highway and two are proposed from 69th. 4. Both parcels exceed the zoning ordinance minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and minimum width of 60 feet. 5. The Commission approved a partitioning across Pacific High- way from the subject property (Way Lee) on October 15, 1974. A finding made by the Commission, relative to this approval, was that a traffic light will be necessary at the inter- section of S. W. 69th and Pacific Highway. A condition was therefore attached to the approved plat which stated that the property owner(s) will participate in the cost of signal- ization of this intersection. The placing of two more restaurants at this intersection will affect this situation. The staff is presently working with the State Highway Depart- ment in determining factually if and when signalization will be necessary. Since the time that this application was sub- mitted, approximately two weeks ago, the staff has been un- able to obtain an answer to this question from the State Highway Department. The City Staff -- Planner, Public Works Director and City Administrator -- believe that while there `�. may be a need for signalization when the proposed restaurants are completed, this question should be resolved factually by the State. This would appear to leave the Commission in the position of not having factual data at this time on the need for a light, hence there exists a questionable basis for requiring participation. } (l' r ( 4 0 fi. PC Staff Report - November 19, 1974 - Item 5.1 -- page 2 Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report November 19, 1974 Agenda Item 5.1 MLP 8-74 Applicant Country Kitchen - Shakey 's Pizza Applicant's Request To partition property located at the intersection of S. W. 69th and Pacific Highway on the northeast corner in order to provide two parcels for separate restaurant facilities. (tax map 1S1 36AD, tax lot 4300) . Staff Findings 1. The site is presently vacant and comprises approximately Commercial, and the The zoning is C-3, General one acre. 3 g two restaurants proposed for this site are permitted uses. 2. The Tigard Community Plan designates subject site appropriate for general commercial development, said plan stating, "The development of individual properties in these areas should ( take into account the traffic, safety and visual problems associated with strip commercial development". 3. One access point is proposed from Pacific Highway and two are proposed from 69th. 4. Both parcels exceed the zoning ordinance minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and minimum width of 60 feet. j 5. The Commission approved a partitioning across Pacific Highway from the subject property (Way Lee) on October 15, 1974. A finding made relative to this approval was that a traffic light will be necessary at the intersection of S. W. 69th and Pacific Highway. A condition was there- fore attached to the approved plat which stated that the property owner(s) will participate in the cost of signal- izing this intersection. With the placing of two more restaurants at this intersection, the need is compounded. The staff is presently working with the State Highway Department in determining when signalization will be necessary. Since the time that this application was submitted, approximately two weeks ago, the staff has not had sufficient time to resolve this matter with the High- way Department. The City staff - Planner, Public Works Director and City Manager, concur that there appears to be a very definite need for signalization when the pro- posed restaurants are completed; however, additional time {E{ • �.r: . gym° is needed to verify this with the state and also to ... determine a method of financing its installation. 6. At the time of preparing this report, Friday, November 15, 1974, the applicant has not submitted the information required for a minor land partitioning in section 17.24» 020 of the Subdivision Ordinance, making it difficult for staff to properly review this request. _' PC Staff Report November- 19, 1974 - Agenda Item 5.1 - page, 2