The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 04/16/1974 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. . � . : � ,- ,.�"�` , AGF�. �., .. �""' T�GARD PLANNTNG COMMISSION Regula� Meeti,ng� April 1�5� 1974 I . � 'Pw�ality Jr. High School - Lecture Roam � �.4650 S,W. 97th Avenue� Tigard� Oregon � PUBLIC HEAR,ING - 7i30 P.M. � , - fi 1. CAL'L TO ORDE'R � . � 2. ROY,L CALL r, 3. APPROV'AZ OF M�NUTEa �'' F 3.1XRsgr�lar Meatir�Q o� M��ch 3� 1974 �" Ragulax Maati�g of Ma�rch 19� 1974 ;Pl�r�u��g S+ea��.om of Maxch 26, 1974 4. �'tTS�IC HEAR�N(f • Lone Cha�g� 4.r ZC 2-74 (F'1�►tchar) � A rnquesti by Fle�char� Ha�nsen �nd Paraonr to c�anga an ex�at3ng A�'�� izigle '. FsmiLy Rssiden�ial zon� to a M•4� �ndur�zial �ark zcsxe *nd a P•D, P�,anr��d �'i �� D�veYopme�n� District �one. 'P'ha �iti� i• loca�sd ati �h� �ouChsar� �orr��x a£ S.W. 72nd Ave�nue and S.W. 'V�rn� Sbraati� aomp�i�bin� 9.36 ac��rr (T+�oc Ma� �' 251 1D, Tax &,at 900)a Staff Findin�� ;: Ta��iaaony & Croee Examin�tian ;;. Sta�'f Racc�mmer►ds,tian Comml,e�ion Discuemic� & Act;ia�n '�; ; 4.2 ZC 7-74 (And��set� 6'� Fou�ht) '" A �requ�e�t by H. A, And�r�en and Joea�h M. Foug'�b to c�h�nge �r� e�i�t�n� k�']r Single Funil� Re�idential �nne to �n M•4� Indu��r�.al P�r'k �ane. 'i''he .ub,�aat proparry coxnpr3e�s 1.72 �cYa� t�nd �,� �ocata� o�n th� northWe�tie�n quadra�� of �he iatierie¢t�on of 5.W. 72ad Ar►eriu� a�d 9sW. 74t�t A^�enae (�Cs� M�p 25l IDC� Tax Lot g00). ;> " Staff Ftnding� Taatimony & Croe� Lxam�.�tu�so� S taft Racomcnanda t3on Commi�r�l�on D�scu�r�ion & Act�on ;,; .3 2C 6•74 (Matusirt�) �1 �,� :.� �s {. A raquest by th� Csty a�' �i�ard tia alun�d a� ��cieti�,n� Coax��y► RU•4� t7�b��n �: Re�idaatisl D��trict to • Cit� R-7� 5l�n�la Fam�� Rri�,denti�.al, seaz�+� in a �:' � sseo�Y� ars�n�xc��! ar�a. 8ab�sct prope��r coe��i�� .39 �tc��r and i� lacati�d j; t� �0863 S.W. 9�th Av��u• (Ts�t Map 181 3�GA� Ta� Loti 203). �': �` F'r �J: i� �'v. � �� .. . . . . � . . . .,. .. � . . . ... . .. ,.. _. � . _ ..�,.. ..r��.F R4. ..f . '- ' __ �' , ,�' �,.; PAGE 2 � GCIMMZSSZ�N AGFNDA - AP�.ZL �69 �.974 ; � ;': 5�af� F�.�d�.n:�s Te��imo�a� & G��as� E��,rn:yxn��aa�n 5��'�' R��c�n�r?eax�a:tac��? s� C�trnra:�ss�.cs�� D�.s��s�:�cr�? & A��a.a�. ; 5. 1��B�,�C H�.ART�T� � �5�� V��:��7:��a �� `. 5.�. M 5=;�� S��et Va�,��:�.€��a - ,S,W. 74th Ave�tiue savxth o£ S.W, ��n�:�� 5�.��et �.i �.�?d �r��t cf S.Wo 7?.nd Aven�ue. �.i �a 5�.�.,f.�' Fa:�id�.�.g� ; Test�im�csy & G�cvss E�:am.ir+�a.��:��. .:; St�aff Re�c�vmmend€ztion °4 Corc�m�.ssia�± DiWc�e�ssa�c��n: & A�t3.o� ,';� 6. SUBll:I;V:CSIONS m P��1imi�.ary P�,��. App�r��rr;�:L Eo1 E��l�woc��l d P��e � �t;�t�n.�a�.�re�.:ltl� P�op��ti.es,� T,o��.ti��o Sau�'� a�' S,W. S�.��.:�s F��y ltc,�:d & w�s�e?°�.y c�f,F�.n�c� C��1�. ; Staff F3,�.d�.ngs �� St�.�ff 'R.�co��a�d�t�.o�.5 �� ; Coe!rmi�sio� Dz��a��sie;n & A.��io��. �'. �. 7„ M1 S�EI,LANEOUS �k G(�p �.1 Go�cept P��.� R�vi�� i�'�� (Sv��r��a°fi�1�d) ({tG�! f i; Request f�r a;p��v�v�.� �s:E P�±a;�� . �.p�•�°t��.�. �.cv�rap�.e� �aitlaaea th� e`St�mm.e�£iel.�da� develes�se�a�:��, Seabject ��.�� ?��.��1 �pp��x�.m�t��.y� ?000 t'�et� e�5t af. th� � e�ist�.�ag "o��t�hor�s�" & b��a��m� S.W. �:u�:h°en R;�� .x��. S,W, S�u�nrne:�fielfl D�~i•ve, � �,:: Sta�f F�.�!rli�2gs �' Stiaff R,e�omm.��.�i�:�:zc�a�s f;: Commiss�.��a Dis��ns��.r�n & A�+�i��. 8. OTl3ER B[TSTNESS 9. ADJOURNMENT �� . �� . ,;�_ , . m _.,. w.. � , , , . � �� -.��. _�.. .:,a.. .. . . ._ , ,,, , . ., , ... •---� � � ,. : �� f�IINUT�S �::; TiGARD PLANNyNG ro�11��SSTON Regular �Ieeti,n9, April 16, �.974 7wality Jr� H,�.gh Schc�ol - LeGture Room 14650 S.W. 97th A��enuF, T�.g��d, Oregon 1. GRL.L. T'0 ORDER A� �The meeting W�s cailed to orde� at 7m30 Pol�m � � � � � � � 2. ROL.L CALL. ± A. Pr�es�nt: Bar.khu�st, F�az��6x�, Hartr�an, (�i�cke.l.�on, � Nico�.a., 5�kat�, Hansen, Ghairman Wi.t�ake�; � staff inembers B�ooks, �nd Bn1.Rn� and � Ci�y AttorrieY, F�er� Ande�san � Bm At�sen�o Commzssion�r B�l.�. � 3o APPRIlVAL OF I�I:NUTES � � q. �linutes wer.e appz°ov�rJ fot� the meet.ings Ma�cch 5�h, �� I''larch 1.9�h and �1�r.ch �6�h 197u•� 4m PUBLTC HEARING � Zone Change 4. Z ZC 2.�74 (F�?tcher) A rs ue�� b F'letcher Han�en and pax�sons tr� char�ge � �I Y � � an existing R-7, Single Fama.ly Res.�dential zone � to a �1-4, :Industr.i.al Park zone and a P-D, Planned Development District zonP. The s�.te is located at the southeas� corner of SoW, 72nd Aven�e ahd SaW. Uarns Street, comp�,i.sing 9v36 acre�m (Tax �ap 2S1 1D, 'Tax Lot 900> � Staff Find�.ngs � i A� Broakds present�ed �he sta�f f`�;nda.ngs ��,Levant j to this cas�e t T�s�timony and Cross Exam�,nata�on � i � Ao Pzoponen�s � �' 1.� Robert F'letchPr, one of�he applicants i.n�roducc�d the project a�chi�ec�, Don % �, � PucMerbaugh, who expl.ain�d �the ;proposAd ; ', developmeri�� He pa�.nted out tha�t a ' traffa.c '' c.�rc��la�i�ore �tudy had been completed anrJ ' ; �. - . _ . .. . ., .:; ., . , :, . _ .��:. , .m.-,;- � �M� � ' measu�es h�d bPer� �a.ken on the p�o�ec� plan ' to meet the' �ecommendata.�+n ofi tha:s t�°�f`fic studyo Improvements recor�mended on �h� � st�dy include the wi�9�ning of ��W. 72r�d �o a.11ow a left hand `�urn larad for entr�ance inta the p�a ject and ag;�eemen`� to .�.t�prbve U��ns Stree� by an Lo1:�Ds The 1.andscape plara attempi�s to re�;ain as mtJCh nata,ve vege�at.�on as possib�e and prc�vides a 40 foot buffer st�°ip nn '72nd to v.�sually insu.late �he Rol.ling Hi11s Resa.den�a:.al a�aa fram the �ro�osed pro jec�o P'I�. Pude:�faaugh s�ated �Eha�t County had approved t�he p�c�Posed drainage plan fo� -t h e sub °ect sXteo J Bo Ques�ions 1.. (�.ickel�on �sked I��co �uderbaugh i.f the Wash:►.ngton Caun�y Public Wo,rk.� De��rtrr�ent h�d f`c�rwarded their a,�rproval of the s�orm dra:i.nage p:lan far the p�a,�ect to th� C.ity of Tigard. 2r �Ir. k�uc�E�rbaugh said that Wash�.ngton Lounty had approved th� c1ra�.n�ge �'lan but. th� C.i.�y public� w�rks staff has not yet bPFn not;�.P;�.ed of th,is approva�. by the Coun�ya 3. �licke.�son asked a.F a. bank was st�.11 being �� consa..der.�d fo:� th� �r�ject o 4a �Irm Pude�baugfi ��i.d th�t � bank is shown in t�he pr.�o ject bu�t i.t i.s na�t I�no�n fo:� certa�.n if a banking fi.�m wi�.l chc.iosQ to l.ocate the�e< 5. Wh�.ttak�r asked wh�t s��eet i.m{�rovernen'ts are being proposed� 6� I�r� Pudex�baugh statr�d that a half stT�et improvement on 72nd tdill b� ma.dP to .�nclude a widening to allow fo:� a left hand tu�n land. 7his widening and required dedir_ation wil,l be made on t�he applicant� eidP of the r.�ght�of�way. Ih addit�.an the applicant wi11 agree .�n writi.ng not to :cr�monstr,ate agaa,nst a fu�,ure LaZ ,De imp�ovemen� c+n 72nd Av�nu�e 70 1"ony (�axi�, la.v,ing on 72nd A�pa , askPd .�f a,�plica�ion h�d been made to the Oregon State Depar�ment of Et�v.��onmental Qua.�,ity fo� the p�o�ased pa�l.�a-nq a�eam �1ra I�ude�baugh st�ted the DoEoQ� wi1,1 nc't :review a pe�mi� app].a,cation tJnti,l. a za�� change has beeh �. aPProv�do Page 2 -1�inutes- 4�16�74 _..,..-�- .-.�--.�� . . . . . . . . � . . .. . . . . . . . .�: . . . . . . .� . 1 � . . . ... .� . � . . . . � So Be�h Bishoo, a r,�s.iden� fz�om SoWo Uarns St�est asked l�ro Pa.id��°b��..�gh zf he did not th.a.nk there w�•re en��h banks already �erving fihis ��a ar�d a,f p:�orf' cotal.d be �ffe�ed as �o a need fo� a b�nl�ing fdca.11ty at �his locat.�one 90 �1z�o Puderb�uq� ��id tha� �1�o F].e•tchE� had �h.�s .i.nformata�n and woul.d �ns�e� �;Fa.is ques�ta:rrr� 1a�P� �,n the pr.PSent�#:�or� l00 �lickel.son asked ho� the co�mon faci,�i��.es Woul,d be ma.�nt�ineda , � � .. . . � . . . . . . � -..f 11.0 �Iro Pude�ba�gh sa.�.d �, 1�gal docum�n�t wc�u�,.d � bP p�ovided whic;h u��uld gua��r�t�� main��n�ncP , of common areas by th� p�o.l'ect ownerso i ; l20 �licksl�an ask�d ho�r �ar�y pa�k�.�og �pac�� . are shown c�n �he plar�o 130 �I�o P�derb�ugh an�c�sced 3l3� �a��.a.ng sp�.r��o � 1.4o I�'lrso Gou1.d, a resi,d�ant P�om Sot�� Ua.�ns 5tr.eet nor��h of the pr��cty asked i,f Uarn� 5t:�eet ' would be pavedo �"' 15. �I:�� P�de�buagh answr��ed �hat the a��lir�3nt Wou].d take p��t a.n a ,l.ocal imp�oUe�ten� c1i�t��ct ta �.mpr.ove SoWo lf��ns �t�ee�o 3m P.rop�nents 1� f�r� Flet�.he;r, one c�f�he appl.ican�sa s�r�k� to a ma�l�et s�ax�vey con�iuct�d coraae�n.i.ng �h� j need fc�r a t�ank a�� l�.�.s 1.oc��.ono NP said i tha�t �he�� a��e 30 �ndustr:a,a1. fi,��a� wi.thin i a h�.l.f mile employing 2C117C1 p�oplee Th� closest � bank is a littlP aver one mi�eo BasAd u�aon the ex,isting and gr��ing indust�,�l .areas � thPre is a need far a b�nk at �his �imem 2a Helen �letzge,r, who 1�.ves ac;coss the st;reet f�om the so osed ro `eet on 7�nd' ven�c� A P P p J � spoke in favor of the request stata.ng that thi� .is the best use that could go onto this si.tee 3a Ra�1ph Nel.son a d�vel,r�pe� c�f s.r,a��t��i p:�operty :in 'the area spol�e in favo� of �the pro ject stating even though �his land i.s shown' for general induu.strial us� on �he comprehens.�ve � plan, office type deve,�,o�m�nt is the most compatib�e use a� th.�s lezcationo Page 3 - I�inutes - 4�1,6�"74 �r. ,, _ _t .., ..:.. , �..�.-.�.� . , . . � . . . . . � . . . Y. . � . . �. 4a �ac.!< S�hevens, of Norris aric� 5��vens Realt,y, spoke in favo� stat�.nc� tha� the�e ,is a �`� need for off'ice spacP i� �the T�.gard areao He po�nted `to his co�7�pany° s �xpe�ience w�ith �ent.al of office space ir� the B�av�rton a�°�a and stated that �the�e .�� def�:n;i.te n�Pr� fos of f�.ce spacP :i.n th� T'igard ��,, 5. Wiley F3uch��, f'rom the F�.:cst Sta.te Bank, _ spoke in favor of the �roject, s�ying that hi,s firm may hP in�terestecl i.n pl.acing a benk fiar_,�.Ts.ty in this p.r.o jecto Do Opponents 1, Beth Ba.shop, a�' SoW� Vax�ns StrPPt, said t;hat th� exa.sti.ng �lan SI104il5 a �edestr..i,�n bicyc.l� p�th �an the east side of "72nd when fhe path is ac�ual.�..y, neFdPd �n tf�e we�t �or childr.�n �ta get to �chool.o ShP sta�tad h�;� hel,ief ,that �he a�pl:.icant should poat a path on �he wes� side �f the st�eet w�her.e cu.rrent nePd ex��sm 2. Brc�ok� a.sk�d �Ir. pud�rk��.�agh .i.f a path could be built �n �t�e west si,d� of 72r�d wY.��l�out obta.ining add.z.tional.. �:�gh�t,��of�t��y9 � 3o I�ro P�dpzbat�gh repl.i.ed �that y��; �cco;cdx.ng �� h.is s�t:u�y a 5 to `7 foo�t pa•th i,r��ld be con�t�ucted wi,t�h�i�t a�d.i.tir�nal righ�t-of��ray� 40 �1�o F`1,�tche� s�t�t�d that, �ha.s wa� the o��gina�. � p.roposa'1 made �'c�r the ��c�j�c,t and s�ated the ; w.�..l,li.ngness of t�Fie ap�l:a,can�; �n mc��e the path i fyom t;he east; s�d� of" ?2nci anc:! �1.are it on thP 4 ��st; �idem 5. Tony �laxa.m of SaW, 72nd, stated his op�osition to the pro,�ect because of the impacts .it would have upon the residential. area� He stated that t�affic would ba increas�sd and that the �a�pl,�cant has not proven a n�ed far the project os given any thought to rush 'hour tra.f`fic o� th� need f�r fire protection, I�r, Fl.etcher. spak� a..n response to �Ir. maxi.m'� comments po.�nti,ng out �hat a market anal.ysi.s had been conduc�ed as wel.l, as a traffic survc�ye 6. Ja�n Parsohs one of �he appl.i.can�ts, said tha�t h� and his partne� �;ad: been l.00king for offiee � space in `the Tigard are� and b�ing unabl.� to � find any had rasorted to c�nstxucting th�ir own and this proj�ct .is th�s�efore the �esul,t� He sta�ed �here is a very def�.r�i.�� need fo� off�;ce spac� in the Tigard `ar.eae Page 4 - f�inutes -� 4�].6-74 , } Staff Reromt��:.�ndation �.. , Ae The staff secommertded approval. ��' the '�eq�es.�ted ; ' zone rh�nges subjec� to the complet�.on of the . � . following c�nditio�nso � � , lo The prope�ty owne� (�) �hall ded�,c�tP to , the . I�� pu�il.�r. 1.0 feet of add�.��.r�n�l r,.i.gh�-�o�'mw�y paia11P1 I SaW� 72nd Aven�� and �.djacent �lie �ubjRCt �.�t�o 2o The prop�rty nwt��r (s) sha1..1 constx�uct a ha.lf stree� improvement, sa�.d imp�ovetnent plans shall general,ly f�1,1aw the recc�mmendat�.ons of' the applicant° s submi.tted traff.�c circul.a��.on study, and �h�1.i bP �pproved tay -�he Wdsh�.�eg�on County Depa�tment of Public Wo.rksm 3o The property owne� (s) �F�a1.1 ag:�ee to p��ticipat� in a 1oca.l a.�rp�ovsr��n•t d�.str�.c'E for �he pr.ar�osP c�f improving 5�We V�.rn� ��reet, sa�.d aga�eern�t�t sha�,l k�e PxPCUted as a �ecordab.l.a aovFn�nt� runn.i.ng dd.�t;h �ha 1�.nrJ o 4� T��e stnrm d��,na.g� plan o�` thP s.�.��e sh�l.l ba sub,ject to th� ��prov��. t�f thP Ci.ty of` 1'ig�rd and �he W��Sha.ngton Coa.�r�ty p�sbl:i.c Wo�ks Depart�m�nt.s� `-- 5o The �aoperty o�nec (s) sha1.1, sg�l�troi�t� �`n� �e��.�w ��d ap�ravaZ �f the C.�.ty At�cs�°!-:�y, � d�aft ofi � Prop�r�y CI�.r:�,��.�r.= ��:y:�c:a�atir.�r� �,��^c�r�rnc�� •t,c� �e used if the ��wnarsh�p of tfie b�i.id.�ng� is d�.v�.de�, s�i.d ac�ree�uen� to def;ine •the raspon� s.�b�.l�,ty for commr�n ar�a r�aintFnance an�l t;o assure acc;ass to each t�u.�.�da.n�o 6m P�z,or ta the a.ssaa�.r�c� of b��,:Ld:i�r�q per.rr�a.ts fo:c each phas� of' const�aactxo�, �t��e prop�:rty os��er (r) i shall. sul�m.�t to tl�� C.�ty pl,�r�n,a.ng st��°� �°��r I �eview and 3pprc�val a detail.ed �.andsoapP plan � for e�ah construct?on phasea Sa�.d landscape plan shall describe �the siz�, locat�.on, and spacing of pl.ant mat�r�.als and how said pl�ant materials are �0 6P maz.n�tainedo � 7a The proper�y owner (s) shal.l construct a , 7 fac�t wide paved pedestr�.an/b�cyc:l.e pathway w.i�thin �the 40 foot 1,andsaaped buffer for the purpose of pub.l.ic transportat:�on and shall. execute an easemen� agr�emen� provida.r�g for perpetual public access to sa.id pathway. ' 8. The property owner (s) sh��.l. p�rovi.de curbs �,: be�ween a.Ll landscaped areaS anc� park�.nc�' 1.o�so Page 5 - �lihutes - 4�16-74 i� _ _ . , _ : . �.. . . � . :�. _ - _.�: . , � � I � 90 The r��opPxty own�� s) sha1,1. constr�ct a. fc,nr.:e i as pxovided by S�ct.ion 18� 60.1,00 (TI�C� �lcrng i the SLDi�9'�{IE�Z'f! proper.ty 1„ihe ad jacent �hat , sou�herly p�rcel. of 1anc1 cu�,r.en�l,y orcup�.ed by a s,i.ngle fa�n�..1.y dr��:�.li.,ngo 5a�.d fence sh�11 be const��acted when the b�.A.i,l��.ngs ar pa�k.�ng a�eas adjacent sa,id parce'l ax� constructedo Fences �.n other �,�ea� of �he s�te sha..11 not be �equired as pe� Sec�ior� �.8056001� (TI�C> Bo H�nsen asked �.f the Caty p�sblic Works Dep�rtmc�r�t had 1.�okerJ a� the f easi,L��1z�y of a path on the west si�e of 72nd Avet�t�e� Cm Brooks saici no the,y ti�d na�t. De Hansen as4�ed how 1.ong ��ha.� path would bem Eo Bro�ks sa�.d f�am V�rr�s S�i�P�t to Gh��:�y Str�e� a�proxz,mat�ly 90Li �to 1.000 FPe�k a Fo Ral.ph Nels�n, .i,r'� the ��srJ.ianc�, ask�;d a,f '�l�� s'taP�' werP recc�tr�mend.ing an aspl��l•� type pa�h or a concrP�e type sa.de�alko Gy Brook.s said that he a�a� reco€nr�end.i.rag a concx�et;e � ty�,e s�.dewalk as has a,.lre�dy heen cons�t:cucted no•rth of Va.rns St�e�to Commissxon Da.scussion ar�d Act.�on A. Whitt�ker went t,h.rou�h the l.ist of "F�asae�o�� requ�,rements w,ith the P.lanni.ng Cor�tn�.ss.r,an seek.i.ng a -cor��r�s�is whether �the bur,den of p�pof Y�ad b�r��o met on each of the 7 qu�es�ion5n Ba No m�miaer of �;he p.lann�.ng camrra:��:+.�n vo.��:�r� a.si opi,na.on that the burd�n of p�oof haci not been � met on any of the "Fasanr�� requi,remonts. C. Sakata statPd her bPlief that a path sho,uld not he required on both s�.des of 72nd� D. Nicol.i saic! that a sidewal.k sh�uld be recommended on the west side bu�t one is no� needed on the e�:st especia,l.ly s,ince nb sidewa.Lk ha� bPen �eyuired of developments to the south� E� Hansen asked the appli.cant� for thsir feelirtgs ' � concerning �he need for sidewalks. ' . (` F'v I�r. Pletcher sai.d he saw � need for a path on the `�. west side of 72nd hu�t nr�t �n �the e�� s%d�a� Page 6 — �linutes -� 4-�16�74� . .. __.._. . , .:., .. r_ .. _. ..... ::.. .... r.�.., _, ; � ., _ _�..:. , ,:. ... , ., . �.,.. . _,: . . :.., . ..,,�. ;. . ....._ u... . ,,,. ,: ... _.:,:�, . . . _ _ ... _ _ ... _ . ,. _ ... � , 1m Pii.ci��:l.son n�oved to a��cve �he reques�tecf � � ' zone ch�nges based upmn fi�he fac� that applicants had r��at the bu�den of px�oof � �equi�ed by "�'asano�� and �o �,nciud� �h,e p s�affi. rPCOmmended cond:itions with the �'�'I change that the eas'�erl.y sid�walk � be d�l.eted �nd �hat the weste,r.ly sidewalk �I extend from Ua:rns St�ee� �o Cherry Streeto t' Th� carnpl.e�ion �t�.me fo;r th�.s s.idewalk be s.�x mon�hs from the timc� of �.ssuance of a building perm�.tm In addition th� site obscur:i.ng fence sh�.l.:l �lso be da.Leted a� � conda.t:�on, Ba�khu��t seconded the mota�on and it passed by u�an�.mous vote of the membe�s presenta 4.2 ZG 7-74 (Andersen & Fought) A re�uest by H�Ao Ande�sen and 'J�seph f�a Fought to change an exysta.ng R-7, Sing,�.e F�mil,y Res.�denta.al zone t� an 1��4, Indus�rial Park zonea The subjee� � property compra.ses 1�72 acres and �.s located on th� i northwestern quadrant of the in�e��ec�a.on of SaWe 72nd Avenue and SoWa 74�h Rveneu (Tax I�ap 2S1. lDC, Tax Lot 800) � `�- Staff Fs.ndings Aa Brooks pre5ented the 5�aff f�.ndinqs rel�vant to this c��e. Testimony & Cross Examin�tion A. Proponents le A�lan Andersen, spake Por, th� applicant st�t�.ng t��at tha.s zone change a.s necessary to enable the l.agical devel.opment of this ent�.re portion of industrial land from 72nd Rvenue back �o the railroad ��racko He said that no .�.mpacts would be created Por the residen�ial. area to the nor�th and �hat a 50 foot wide l.andscape buffer ,is being proposed� - The rpzoning is propez becau.se .it conforms with the Tigard Community Plan �nd the adjacent land use and zoningm Bo Questions 1. �lickelson asked if a tire retreading operation were st.i11 being consa.derAd for th,is si�ee � 2. �Ir� AnderSen �eplied tha� a t,ire ret�eading; plant �.s not allowed in an �I-4 zone and such a prajer�t is not bei.ng considered for this sz.t�. Page 5-�Iinutes - 4-,16�?4 � . . . . . . . .� . . . . .� � �. � .. � � � � �. .. � � � � � . . . . ... `�.i , , 3o f�ickel�on asked �ha� ��,ype of �se z� be�ing cc�nsid�s�eda 4o (�rm AndersPn stated th�t no spPC�,fiic �s� :i;� �. bsing con�:�d�;�ed �t thP pa esen� �.�me, but the ap�.�.ican� �.ro�er�ds c�n rJevelop�.r�g �he p;��pert:y 3cco�d�.ng •�o ��r� pe�ma��ted' �s�,s .�n 'th:e �1�4 z`or��o He s�a�ec! tha�� fiP had a conversat.�or� ` ' �a.�t;h �he staff concerr�:ing �t� appl.ic�.�t�,on wh�:ch da.d not propose a spec��f.�c �s� and �he s�a�'f had detPrmined aftP� talkitig wi;th �he C,�.t;y A�tc��ney �.t .�s nat roec�s�ary f nr� �.r� app.l,a.ca�i,mn �o �.nclude a spec�.f'ic useo 5o Fred AndPr�on, the C�:ty A��o�•e�Qy, r��1.7.ed that :�t .�,� pr�pe�r �o ��zone whe�e 3�t� �.,s conf'o�rtaance w.�th th� eompz�hens.�ve p,�ar� and as a �esi�s.l�t of �: cta�r�n� and �p ��o d�te p.l,an •the p�oof� �.x�� ra�t a� con�.��ler�blea Ea.the�' the Ci,�y c��° p�operty c�wne� c�.n ,�.n.�.�ta.�te a rezons.rag �;o b�ing th� z�r�:�r�g ,i�a �tr� corofc�a°mance w,�.th the ccsmpr�'hen��.v� pl.ano F�'�d And�rs�n ther� wa�ned t;he P�:anni�g Cc�mma.ssion not tp �°�Z,y tao he��.�y crr� spec�.f�c �xo�eo�al,s and '�o c�nsa.dP� al,l. the t�ses wh.iah e�ay be al,l�wed �,n tFae zone be�.��g �eq�estPd� Opponents � Aa T�ny Plaxim of ��Wm 72nd Ar�Pr�s�e, �a�.d tha� �he ��p1.a.cants inter��t,ion t� vac�ate SoW< 74•th St�es�t to al1.�w de�el.opment of tt��.s prr�pe�ty would be det�.imr�ntal to p�blyc s�fe�y in that it �ould ' not a11�ow adeqt�ate firP p:�ot,ertion �or tha indu�trial p�o��rty to •the �Pa�o Sta�f Recomrre�nda�t.�oe� Am 8rooks x�c�commended tabli.ng of th�.s �equest to the next moet.�ng because t�he �p�►licant had not properly demons�x�a�;ed the burdc�n o�' proof �equi.red by "Fasano" ev�n tho�agh the subjec� s1,�te is shown for industrial u�e on the 7igaa�d Community planm Commission Discussion and Action Ao Barkhurs� said he woi�l,d l..�ke �o see a �traf�.�c circulation stvdy don�e -fo� the s.�te becau�e there is a question as to how access shoul.d be gai.n�d to th�.s property. B� Sakata s�,id sl�� da.d not feel the appl.ican� had met the burden of proof reqt�ired by "Fasano�� for rezc�ningm Page 6 - �linu�es -� 4-16�-74 i �i, _, . ... ._: �.,. :�,.�,;.—, . ...� � ......:N�.. _ .. :..;� • • C. Wh�:ttaker said out�a.ght� 1��4 zane i:s no� apPs��pr�.at� on th.�� s�.te and �his z�ne , change and ths p�opea� l�c��:i.on af a street � sholild be consider.ed with a spec.�fic psopos�.1 . and a �equest for � co�b.�,na��s.on 1��4, P�D zone changeo Dm I��ckel.son mov�d '�o cieray the r,eques't based upon the f.�nd.inc� �ha� thie a�ap�,�c�nt had not mpt the burden of pr�c�f as �eq��.�ec) by ,rFasano��. Barkhu�s�; secar��led t,l�e tno�a.on an�1 the mot.�or� pas�e�! by a ��jo�°�,�y v�,�� w,�t;h HansPn vot.�r�g n�yo • 40 3 ZC E�74 (mann�.r�g) A request by the Gity of T.igarcl �o c6��ge �.n ex�,�•t;.�,ng , County RUm4, U�bah Fesa.�en�.��.1 D:i-st�:�r� to a C:�:ty , ��7, Single F'a�ily Res�:des��t�al zr�r�� :.a,n d npo�ly �nr�exed area� Sub�ject pa°c�pe:c�ty cor��,�� o 39 �c:c�s ar��J �.s located at 1.0865 �mWm 95�k�h A�ren�aP (�'ax I�a�r �,51 35CA, Tax L.o� 2Q3) . StaPf Finds.rag� A, Brnok� presen�ed �he s��ff f`:i.nd.i,n�s �e]�ets�r��t to this ca�e. r T'estimony and l;�ass Exam,inat�,c?� �" Ao P�oponen�s 1� No ane appe��ed �.� supp�r��t of ��hi.s regue�to Bo Opponer�ts .10 No c�n� a��p�axed �.ea r��s.�t�io�a �r� �t;h:�� eq�gsta Staff Recommendation Ao Sta.ff recommended �pproval of the Ca.�y� s request to change the exa.stin� zUna.ng classzf�icat�.on from RU-4, Urban Re�.ir�ential D,is�t�z:c� �to a C�.ty R-�7, Sinr�le F'atn.�.:ly Res.�d�nt.ial zoneA Commissior� D�.scuss.ion and Ac�t.7.oro A< Barkhurst moved to �.pprovQ the req�es�ed change based upon the �taff findingsa �I:ick�l.son secc�nded the motion a��d the mo�t.�on pa��ed by uh�himou�- vote of the memb�:�s �re�en�e 5. PUBLIC HEARING - Street U�c�tipn 5.1 I� 5-74 St�eet Uacati.on - SoWo 74'th Avenue south of � SeWo Cherry St��eet and west of SoWo 72nd Avenu�o' Page 7 - I�inu�es � 4�16w74 � ti t ;:� , •. �. .. : _ .. ��, ... Y ' Staff Finci�.ngs ;.. Ro Br:ooks p�esented the s�a�'f f'.ir�d�.a�g� �°P1PV�;nt to � th�:,s caseo Staff Recor�menda�i�n A� Brook� r.�commer�ded �abl�.ng of this �.tPm �o the next re��lar m�ee�t.ing �.nd �.n �ddi.tY.on �ff a�ed �ai� 5ug�es��.on that on.Ly the r�o��th�� po�t:�,�ra mf SoW. 74th Street be vacated ar�d nmt th� e�.stmwest portior�m Te�timony and Cross Exa.m.�nat�.on Ae Proponents � E} � �.o N�n HoJ.�n�s spoke for �h� �PP�.a.cd�l:s, Ar�de�sen ( an.d Fca�c�ht 9 aska.ng �ha� the �t:cea� �raoat.�,on � be a�s�ro�ov�dm Zr� �dd�.��,�,�� sf�e �aas�d the � q�ces�t.�on that �he or�.g.�ro�:� ;�t;a�Ee� ,ded�,c�.��,on f to th� Gounty was nc�t ��cu�e��.y t�ade and ; possib�.�.ity '�he�Pfcs�e ex.i.�ted tha� th�.s was � no� a va1�.d dedir��tiono ShP al�o s•t��tPd � tha� 'tha exist.irag e�t;��nce of' SoWo 74th ( to SoWo 72nd .�� a poo:r. a1;:�gnmpn� and sho�.old ) be vac�.�ter� to �.1.10� a r�e� s��ee� �to be placed i .�.r� a. be�ttes ].ocat�o�o j f �- B. Oppr��en�� Ao Tony f�ax.�m of SoWo 72.nd Auen�P s�oke aga�.nst the z�aqr�ested vacat.�on stat�r�g that th� drain-- � age for the area to the nox�th is now �ow�erJ � �ta the 7!�th St�eet ��.gh��of��ay an� f0?' this • �eason shou�.d raot be vacatPCi. � Commissi.on Discuss.ion and Action ' oved �o tabl.e cat�sidera�.�.on of this � A. Barkhurst m , item to the I�ay 7, ,�974 mee•�.�rogm f��.ckelson ; seconder� t,he mot�on and the mot.ion passed by � unanimous vote of the comm.i�sion presente � 6. SUBDIUIS�ON — PR�LrI�TNARY PLNT' NPP'ROUAL 6. 1 EngleWOOd — Phase I -� Prope�ty locat.�ono south of ; SoWa Schol.l� F'e�ry Road and wc�s�e�I.y of � �'anno Cseek � � , Staff Findings � , A. B�ooks pres$nted the s�aff fy.redings se:Levan� � to this easeo � �:' i Page 8 — �linutes — 4�1.6��74 i a � , ,�:i j 1 I _ � i � � . ,: _ :� °'� . . . ..-.a-.�...._.,.. . . �. _ . . . . . . . . . . . � . ,:,.. , � . , :-., :,,: � ,.,::, ..�... ' , -; .. _ . ._ :_.. , .. . . .:;.. . _. . . . . .. . ...... .. ,.,,.. . ...:.... . .._.:. .. ...... .. ..._ .. . �..:. ..._.,. _... . .._.... ,. .:., . . . . .. . . .,�.�} .. ... �. ►�. �... � - . � � . � . � � . . . � � �. .� � . . .. ` S'taff Recommendation i A. Brooks recommended app�oval a�F t;he E�g.lewood �, ' phase T pr.el.�;mina�cy pla� subje�t �to �he fol:�loW�ng pl�t moda.ficati�nso . � la 'fhat So:Wo Sp�.ingwood Raad h� ch�r�ged to rgad SoWo Sp�.it�g��ood D�,�.vPo � 2o T'hat the 5 foot ��t�,1.�ty ea�emen�s adjacen� SaW. Beechwood Cou�'t and SoWo Lakewood Cou�t, as requ,a.�ed by �he PLann:�ng Comm�,ss�,on at tFte related April 2, 1974 s�bd�.v.��.on variance hea�c�.n be ref'loc�ted on �he final; latm 9 � P 3. That a ten foot; �oa.d x�.gh�-of�way ded�.catior� ad jacent;S.J,l.o SchoLls Ferx�y Ro�d be �efl:ected � a�� thP fi"in�,l pla�to Sa�.d ded.�c�t.�at� a.s re��.a�.r,ed by Exh.zb,�.t �'�" r�f O�d.i.nanee Na� 7��17 as approvPd, 6y the Gity Cc�unrs„l. on Ju1y 9, :1973m Testa.mony and Cross Examin��ion Ae Erna.e P�.��t•t, of CcammvnwPal.th Pso(�e�tiPS' made a b��.��' s�atement �sking th� Pl.a�ning Commi.ss.icsn to a�prove thc� si�t�rrii�ted prQl.�tn�naa�y p1,at, Commission D.zsr,uss�.on and P,ct%on a.., . �' Am Barkhur�st rnoved �to �p��ov� �he submit�r�d ��gla.mina�°y pl.a� acrord�.ng tr� th� s��.Ff :cecc�r�t�erided conditionsm (��.c!<el.spn seconded tt��a mata..on and the motion pa��ed by ur��n�,mou� vote oF the rnembers presenta 70 (�TSCELLANEOIJS 7.1 Concapt Pl.�n Review (ZC 5-�7Z) ( Summ6rf�.eldj Request far approval of Phase I �partmen� com�Tex �ithin >. the �'Summerfield�� devel.opmentm Sub jec� site �ocated approximatPly 1.000 feet east of the exist�.ng "gatehouse" ' and between SoW� Du�ham Road a.nd SoWo Summerf�.eld Driveo Staff Findings Aa Brooks p�esented the staff Pindings rel,evan� ta this casem Th,is .incl.uded a 1.et�e� from �hP Tualat,in Rural Fire pi.s�r.ic� Fire I�arh'sal, -Joe Greulich, s�ating the nead for s�tandard' street wid�ths in the proposed pro j�ct for fa.re f�.ght.ing purpose5, Staff Recommenda�t.�on � Ao No staff recocnmehdat�.on was given. Page 9 - (�inutss - 4-1.6�74 I ' ' Comm.�ssion D�sci�ss.�on and Aati.on � Ao Ray f3arte1l, �he p�o ject a�ch.�,t�rt, sa.�,d t�hat �ha � (� re�son fo:� the P-D zone �.� to provic�e fl.exib�.lity :in px�o jec� des:�gn ,in csrr�er t� pxodc�oe a s�perior develop�nent� He �hen sta�ed �hat if° t,he planning Comm.iss.�on we�e qrsing �o .r�q�.��.�e a1.1. of �ihe standard's norma.11y �°�qu.i.r�d �.n an ap�.r�men�t compl.ex, as sug�ested by �h� fire r�a:�shal, tFsat th��s is no reaso€� for the c.i•ty hava.ng a PmD zoe�ee B. Brooks replir�d that the �tanda�ds under cc�t��,iderm at�.on hFre are tho�e affecting the p�blic safety and that it is h.is bel,7.ef t;ha�� hese standards should �iot be var�,edo Co Joe Gre�lich, Fa.re �larshal., st�.�ed �he need for , w.�der s��°c�e�ts for f�.�e �'.�gh•t�,ng p�as�aoseso He sa�,d th.is �.s both �o a11o� �eha.cl,es to reaah a f.ire ' zn congested a��a,s and ��vo to px°oa�:i,de a b�eak be�:ween fi..res and a p.�arP fo� fire f�.ghters t�o �ake a �tand aga,�.nst a fa.rq� Dm Wh,i.t-�ake�r sa:i.d' tha.�t the poi,nt of �he a,ssue, as he sees it, is p�ab].ic safety and there does not , appear �to be �ny d.i,s�gz�ePmera� on �he land use aspect of the suhm�.tted site developm�nt pl.ano Eo I�ickelson sai�l �that tE�P Plartlning Cc+mmiss,ion must �- r.eqv,ire a s�ree•t t�:�dth nec�ssary to ��otect ; public he�l-�h s�fety and wslfaseo F. Saka�� moveci to deny �he Sum�riez�fiield Phase T ap�rt,mPnts as subma,�t�dm F?°a�ie� spcondc�d and �the m�t.�on fa�.�.sd by a ma,�o��.ty vo�ee . Go Hansen moved to tabl.e �his i�em and send it back to the staf'f to work �ith the applicant �owards meeting the concerns expressed �for the public safety. Sakata second�d the motion and the motyon passed by unan�mous votee 8. AqJOURNI�ENT: 12v01 Ao�lo �,,,:' Page 10 - I�inutes � 4-�16�-74 ' a . ._ _ _ �_. . . . � W. .__ .. ..�.. *# � .. . ... . . . � . . . . . . . . .. . � - �� , . . . , . . . . � . . � . � � ... �� rj , I, TIGARD PLANNING COf�I�ISSION �r Staff Report qpril 16, .t974 Agenda Item 4.1 ZC 2-?4 (Fletcher) . �_, Zo�e Change For property at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and �� S.W. Varns S�. and canprising 9. 36 acres. (Tax �1ap 2ST, Tax Lot 9D0) Applicant_ _ _ Fletcher, Haussen and Parsons Applicant� s Reguest � . Aoproval of a change of zone classification from R-7 Sing1E Family Residential to an I�-4, Industrial Park zone with an overlying P. D. , Planned Development District zone. Applicant' s Propcisal To construct approximately 100,000 square feet of 2-story� office buildings and a bank. ;• �� Staff Findinos 1. See attached map for existing land use and zoning ' . � patterns. 2. Please note the applicant's enclo-sed "General Develop- ' ment. Plan and Program. !' � 3. The site is currently undeve].oped. 4. The Ti4ard Community Plan designates the subject site as � General Industrial, said Plan stating this category is intended to consider the following goals: a. To provide locations for a wide range of industrial ;� uses that are compatible with one another. b. To protect land designated for, industry from encroach- ment by uses Which are not compatible. � '� c. To encourage the location of industry that will provide �mployment and that will broaden the tax base of the community. �;� __. ;.. . , . .: .,.� � , , _ . _.. . .. .. ,�. ,. .::< ._..,, ,,.�. ,. . , . , . � , � --- - _ . .� ,. ,.,,. _ - ,,--,�.,-.,.. ...�� . .. .. . . . � .... _ . . . .. . . � .. : . � .. .p . � . � . � . , Staff Report Agenda Item 4. 1 -2- • April 16, 1974 " ZC 2-74 (Fletcher) �� Policies and Standards of t'he Ge�eral Industrial cat- ( �,_ egory are stated as follows: a. Use of planned unit developmen•t procedures is encour- aged in �rder to better relate industrial develop- �:..' - ment with adjoining us�s. . b. The plar�ning commission will i�eview the site plan of � each proposed development, as provided in the zoning ordinance, in order to ��' � svaluate the compatibility of vehicular access, signs, lighting, building placement and designs, and land- s�aping Wi�h adjoining usES, both existing an.d pro- posed. c. Development will coincid� with the provision of public streets, Water and seWerage facilities. These facil- ities. These facilities shall be (a) capable of adequately serving all intervening properties as well 'as the proposed development� and (b) designed to meet city or county standards. 5. The applicant' s request is in conformance with the T, iqard • Communit� Plan as an f�-4, Industrial Park zone is aPprop- riate within the "General Industrial°' designation of the � � �1an. The applicant ' s request conforms to the goals of . ,t;he Tiqarc) Community Plan as well as Policies a, b, and c of the Plan' s General Industrial'� cateoory. .6. The applicant has shown a community used for the land use � change propc�sed. There are few large easily developed and similarly, zoned parcels within the City able to accomo- date an office park complex �of the proposed magnitude. 7. The type of zoning and use proposed will have the least adverse effect of any industsial use or industrial zone . one ti�e adjacent neighborho�d. The (�-4, Indus�rial Park � zone is the most restrictive industrial zone �in terms of intensity of use and the oPfice and bank uses, permitted in the 1�-4 zone, are the least intensive uses Within the �I-4 zone. Offices are compatible with both adjacent � � industrial and residential uses. The offices proposed are to be constructed at a residential scale and set back a considerable distance from S.U. 72nd Avenue. They are to be buffered fram view of the residential area to the � west by a 40 foot landscaped strip. Increased traffic on � S.W. 72nd Avenue generated by the proposed cJevelopment, Will have the largest adverse affect �n the adjacent properties. � . � . � � , „ � ;, - ...«,.. . , . - - .. , � , r,-,.— , S�aff Report Agenda Item 4.1 -3- April 16, 1974 • ZC 2-74 (Fletcfier) .. . , 'I ' C � ; 8• Water and Sewer utility lines are available to serve the subject property. A 12 inch water line is located in ' S.W. 72nd Ave. and an 8 inch sewer line is located at tfie intersectio:n of S.W. ?2nd Ave. and Sandburg St. There �` is currently a moratorium on sewer connections in effect " until such time as the Unified Sewerage Agency' s Durham ' Sewerage Treatment Plant is operational. Some commercial - permits remain available and some neW permits may 6ecome available nrior to the opening of tfie Durham Plant. �,::. The subject moratorium is temporary. Construction was : commenced on the Durham Plant and said facility is schedul- ed for completion during the spring of 1976. This will allow the applicant 's proposal to be constr�cted Within a reasonable period of time. S.W. 72nd Ave. and S.W. .. Varns St. , currently provide vehicular access to the subject site. Neither street is adequate t:o carry the . increased� traffic or accomodate left turn movements � ' gsnerated by the proposed 'development. These streets ; ' must be improved to acaommodate. traffic generated by the . development. S.W. 72nd Ave. is a County Road while the City has requested jurisdiction over �/arns St. ; also currently a County Road. It is anticipated the City will . possess jurisdiction over S.W. Uarn � St. prior to the finalization of the subject zone change, thus allowing ' � the City to initiate a local improvement district for � the irnprovement of S.W. Uarns St. .A half street improve- ment, because the City canr�ot form an L. I .D. for improve- ment �f County Roads, is the most practical means of providing additional traffic capacity and safety on . S.W. 72nd Ave. Right-of-�ay width on S.W. Varns meets � City t�inimums, 6ut a min.imum l0 .foot dedication is . necessary to 6ring S.W. 72nd to City Collector street right-�of-way, The applicant proposes storm drainage from the site into the S.W. 72nd Ave. right-of-way. This will require . approval from Washington County. 9. The submitted General Dpvelopment Plan and Program conforms � to the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan �'. and Prograrn as required by Section 18. 56.030 (d� (1) (q) � � . Tigard I�unicipal Code. The applicant has met all sub- ;' mission requirements of . Section 18. 56. 030 (TI�C) [�ith the k exception that no draft oF a document providing for the maintenance of common facilities has been provided. :� 10. The submitted General Development Plan and Program r meets all standards set forth in Chapter 18. 60, Offstreet � Parking and .Chapter 18, 64, Access and Egress, Tigard ; (�unicipal Code; with the following �xceptions: s,,. ; ( f � #. • � �,, a • . � , Staff Report Agenda Item 4.•1 -4- Apsil lfi, 1974 • ZC 2-74 (Flstcher� ,�"`� Section 18. 6D. 100 Landscapinq, screening requirements. �,�'` "Required off-street parking shall be allowed in any yai•d . set-back, provided that the first two feet in from the � property line are maintained in landscaping, and provided i � that any common boundary along which this parking is a11oW- � �,: ed between a residential zone and any otFier zone is • screened by a f�nce obscuring the sight of normal adjacent � pedestri'an and vehicular traffic, the erection of which � shall be the responsibility of the ownership in the nonresidential zonp. " � �i f,• Section 18. 60. 18D Bumper rails and curbs: "Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot shall be Provided with a bumper rail or-a curb a� least 4 inches ' high located 4 feet Within the property line. " a Section 18. 64. 030 I�inimum requireme�ts--Commercial 8� � Industrial Uses. ' �, t � �, A project requiring ovEr 250 parking spaces shall have ` ` � the minimum access requirements defined by thE Planning } t� Commission. r� � The submitted GenEral Development Plan and Program provides �; adequate site access and egress if S.W. 72nd Ave. and S.W. • �; Uarns �� St. are constructed to City and County approved �'. �'�' � standards. � • � � 11. The submitted landscape plan is necessarily c�eneral because of the inability to accurately locate existing � trees in the heavy undergrowth. The concept is sufficient � for revi,eW as a component of the General Development ' plan and Program, however a detailed landscape plan should • �`r be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval � �j as each phase is constructed. Said landscape plan indicates �i a footpath in the 40 foot landscaped buffer strip adjacent �' S.W. 72nd Ave. As there is no assurance a pedestria�/ r bicycle pathway can be constructed on the western side � � of S.IJ. ?2nd Ave. due to restricted right-of-way and , because such a facility will be necessary in the future �;; and is designated a need Within adapted Tiqard Area <! Comprehensive Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathwa.y Plan, the staff ,x� �' feels the City sfi ould request an access agreement and the � applicant should construct a minimum 7 foo� wide paved f':.;, pedestrian�bicycle path on the easterly side of S.W. 72nd � Ave. and within the 40 foot landscaped b:uf�er strip. , ', � Staff Recommendation i qpproval of the ' requested zone changes subject �o the comple- tion of the fallot�ing conditionsc • � ��I � . ,: _ � , . ,... .� , ,- , . _ .. - . s�' , .° . � , _ _ _ _ _ _ , , �!' � . . � ° Staff Report Agenda Ttem 4. 1 -5- April 16, 1974 �; ' ZC 2-?4 (Fletcher) �� l. The property owner(s) shall dedicate to �he public 10 Peet �� of additional right-of-Way parallel S.W. 72nd Avenue and � �1�;�` i'. t� adjacent the subject site. � � 2. The praperty owner(s) shall construct a half street im- ;1' �y provement, said improvement plans shall gener�lly folloW �� -^ the recommendations of the applicant' s submitted traffic. I:;j circulation study, and shall be approved by the Washinoton County Department of Public Works. �� u3. The property owner(s� shall agree to. participate in � �'� a local improvement district for the purpose of improving �;I S.W. Uarns St. , said agreement shall be executed a� a �'I ' recordable covenant running with the land. � ,, - - � 4. The storm drainage plan of the site shall be subject � . to the appraval of the City of Tigard and the Washington �� County Public Works Departments. 5. The property owner(s) shall submit for review and approval A ttorne a draft of a Pro ert Owners Associ.a- of the Cit y, P Y Y . . . tion agreement to be used if the oWnership of the buildings is divided, said agreement to define the responsibility for common ar.ea maintenance and to assure access to each ' building • . • ii 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase ' � of construction, the property owner(s) shal]. sub.mit to the �3 City planning staPf Por review and approval a detailed � • . l�ndscape plan for each construction phase. Said land- scape plan shall describe the size, location, and spacing of plant materials and how said plant materials are to be maintained. K . . ��; . 7. The property owner(s) shall construct a ? foot wide • �- paved pedestrian�bicycle pathway Within the 40 fnot land- t� �. scaped 'buffer for the purpose of public transportation ��, and shall execute an easement agreement providing For ; perpetual public ,access to said pa�thway. �; ' i.s �., 8. The property �wner(s) sha11 provide curbs between all �a lzndscaped areas and parking 1ots. � 9. The property owner(s) shall construct a fence as provided 4` � � by Section 18. 60. 100 (TI�C) along the southern property �� line adjacent that southerly parcel of land currently �� occupied by a single family dwelling. Said fence shall � � be constructed when the buildings or parking areas adjacent �' said parcel are constructed. Fences in other areas o�F the � � si�ce shall not be required as per Section 18. 56. 010 (T(�C) . , � � �. `_: �•` _ ,,, . . . ,: _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ � � � � � �1� �l � . ��1� � � � . � � � � �'O �4, ._' � � . ��, R 7' - ,. . . . � �� . . � � � � . '"L_�•• � G�o�`A�A � � � � � � � �� n < � < � rn z . c i < <„ �,, �s m m � � � z � �� l S NAt F'T N ST EE i � . eti sa�-� ca � c� � ° `..�.°s-`..r"" °_ `� . ;T ?l 'D — — < — ,= II , � R ;, ' ,�,jp . ' �� . y.�. SW IRtYI STREET ; �� . . VA NS I � �� • V�L��j` r� ' - SF . STREET `� y � i Fb • . � � _. , --- - !� '' S�C� • . .� . � - �,�' y � � , I ' . . � - < ' V'�t�t-c- ' �� `'w�` . k':, rn rn � : �� ,; g FIR STREET � ,: ,5 Fn ��`� oF�t � � ;; . � 6�1�► �= ' g SFID • • ;: .. ...;:.......• ,. ..,.,>:�... � , �r: i✓ N t� �� . F �� V14iG41►�1' 3�'10 t-i,,/�"�� ,:'! ' HE RY STR�ET N � � "" 4,; � SANDBU.RG � . � i; � ' �, , �� . . . �� . 3 STREET �� ' . ;; ; m • ' �i � . rZn � � . — Y C �.} M 3 � . �?: ��. . �� . � , . � � . �� , � � _ , ; . �� : . : _ -- _.: .. ._._. _..._ . _ _ _ ,.�'. • . ...: :,,a , .,. _... _ , r 4 / ;' s' ;. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION �' Staff Report l �' "; April 16� 1974 • _ Agenda Item 4.2 ZC 7-74 (Anderson & Fought) � � i 2.one Change s For property located at the northc�estern quadrant of the intersection of S.�•1. %; 72nd Avenue and S.CJ. 74th Avenue and comprising 1.72 acres. (Tax Map 2S1 1DC, ,j, Tax Lot 800). � 1 APplicant t� 1 H. A. Andersen & Joseph M. Fought :� � Applicant's Request � !� ,�:, �; Approval of a change in zoning cLassification from an existing R�7, SingLe ; Family Residential zone to an M-4, Industrial Park aone. '; ;i � ��licant's Proposal �'' �i To construct a combined tire retreading plant, warel�ouse & office Lacility- '.i x; � �� S taf f Find^ings 1. See attached map for existing land use and zoning patterns. 2. See attached applicant�s Fasano response. Applicant has stated he will submit revised response. i. 3. The subject site is currently vacant. 4. The Ti�ard Community Plan designates the subject site as General ; Industrial, said Plan stating this category is intended to consider � the followiug goais: . a. `po provide locations for a wide range of industrial uses that are compatible with one another. � b. To pzotect land designated for industry from encroachmen� h; uses which are not compatible. c.. To encourage the location of industry that will provide employment and that will broaden the tax base of the community. Policies and Standards of the General Industrial category are stated � as followst ;� y. Use of planned unit development procedures is encouraged in order to � better relate industrial development �aith adjoining uses. l b. The planning commission will review the site plan of each proposed development, as provided in the zoning ordinance, in order to , : � Staff Report -2- April 16, 1974 .�' Agenda Item 4.2 ZC 7-74 evaluate the compatibility of vehicular access, signs, lighting, �' building placement and designs, anfl landscaping with adjoining � �� ' uses, both existing and proposed. c. DeveloPment will coincide with the provision of public streets, water and sewerage facilities. These facilities shall be (a) capable of • adequately serving all intervening properties as well as the proposed ' development, and (b) designed to meet city or county standards. 5. The applicant has not submitted a response to the "Fasano Guidelines" adequate to ailow staff review. The applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence in favor of his requested zone change. 6. Si�ht distance is severLy restricted related to site access and egress _ from S.W. 72nd Avenue. There is a danger to public safety if development occurs on 'the subject site. Sight distance is Liri�ited by a hump in the grade of S.W. 72nd north of the subject site and by a sharp curve and bank to the south. It is currently difficult to egress from the . subject site with assurance that such egress is safe. Visibility to the north and south is restricted, leaving an existing motorist little chance to assess the chances of a safe exit, Left turns into the proposed site are also hazardous because of restricted sight distance around the north- bound curve and the narro�mess of the road. The existing paving width of S.11. 72nd Avenue is 20 feet. S.W. 72nd currently carries approximately � 4400 vehicies per day at S.W. Varns Street. ; �� Oregon Revised Statutes, Section 227.240 states that zoning ordinances . "shall be designed to promote the public health, safety and general welfare" and fUrther states that zoning ordinances shall also be "designed to secure safety from fire and other dangers and to promote the publ.ic health and welfare. .." Section 18.04.020 (9), Tigard r4unicipal Code, states that one purpose , of Title �l8 (TT9C) is to "provide public health, safety, convenience and !�� general welfare in general." � �' ,! 7. Tire retreading is a conditional use in a C-3, General Commercial zone• '� and is neither a permitted or conditional use in an M-4, Industrial Park 4' • zone. Warehousing is a conditional use and offices are a permitted use �j in an Tf-4, Industrial Park aone. • `=i 8. The subject site is adjacent a single fami�.y residential ne.ighborhood. � Considering the "General Industrial" designation of the Tigard Community ,�.a Plan, the M-4, Industri al Park zone is the zone most compatible with •!� residential development. If the requested zone change is approved, 'Ir care should be taken to protect the residential environment and residential � property values. The buffering between uses becomes increasingly important •�; as the differences between uses increase in nature and intensity. The �' aPplicant has not stated if the proposed use will have an adverse �� impact upon the adjacent community. !? k? � Staff Recor,unendation . � � �; �� . � �;: Staff wishes to withhold a formal recommendation until the applicant addresses � �� the "Fasano Guidelines"e �`a �''� ��V F: . _. . ..._� . :.. _... . . .. �, . -- � — _ _ _ ,-� � ' ' •�-� ^ � .� � � - �� one � C �an- � �� = . g , . . � . . � � � 1: 3S • ��+ •��• i�� I •�• � �N.�� I �:��r ' v� r�` r • - GOY r » I � �• �� SW . .....R:t� ��M ' . . . . ��M�I• 1��• J 4 ; ,� ,'+� .�� ...��... CHERRY �✓ ' S . -»�,STREE-T:� . �,, .., �/�/� . : �.�4a�\�1:�1� ♦ '. .. �.�Y��1'� � � . � �.� � ..•�\ �iVV , ly YM � �� Y M!� 1• • •�\'l��.• �\��• . . � � `� 1800 ITOO IEOD I�V 1400 13W S00 v� . ' • ? • � �� S�1.� `�� ° : (' '.,. !y :• . 3� �' � , .SFt� SFD SFC� _ r . : c� _ . .� � � � `�• : - 38 � � 39 : �0 : r�I ' ♦ : � �3 � , � '+ w,�t�� .a� �d•• • t . �. (� � �. ; 2 •', =,�•,.�. �ar'. SANDBU�G S1rREET ��. • � � J � � �7 �� ' � � • � 600 sa• �" • � �� . . � - fI�Y u . ' _ , ....�•, . �FC� ; ,AOO AS+soc.tAT�� r •aa b J � ,�sk �oMP�T�t2. .�.r.�.. .ro.. . . . • . (q11101 POM1i �� . � GT'inl�`L�S .. � 3301 �� 1�a�1� � s �n•�t• �7r.��.. � /70 It ' . _ � � . . . f ��li• /10• J E • � . . � • � � • • �oc . cc 1 w. �za+� • . //A� . � . . � � V�C..Ar-1-lT . �: � � ° SF1C� ' - " . - . �- . . . ... ,,-. .. . � � .r►i r «• � �� .•�t. � � �tt . �90� tosef . • ..• �.`4i � �' ' • �:oo V�GA,�"• � � �R� :� ; . "°° FI RsT sT�-TE. . �so.e � c.►r . o � c • • . l�`' ��` � s.. ,ort� ) -� . � : + y �/Tl�� Q�t�T►rti: . . • � { : � i i . R � ►T�� . � I � � I � a�-� ��` : . � ° � � - 3 '� , ' ��L��il ;�"��= . N ��r� � � . . �� ;; ' � ~ � . � , � J��, / 1 � `( . � . • , Y�N � •• �t • . • .. .Y � � � � �. � .�. �� • �. � ' •�Y)Y[ . ` ' . .. , � • ' ' �� IfM[ Iq.11.6�• !� . . - �� .��t . .. ' . ', � . . .. •1rF�t��v.iCQ.� 1•. • L ne �v[ OR wr G�4wW Gl t b0 !f= •+ •u•v . L • '� .` � � � . . � . . _ 1 � � I 100 I ,� �` • � • ti'ti ,,� `'� t� � �.•�• =.=.� —. ��e�a� �� .w� •�� .� �� SO.ft ` ` 6��•' �. . . .. . . . �� ' �, - � � 3 . . - . ��`�• , ��„� y • � y • � ' •r ' SEE •►+�� ' � i000 �, 2S�1�I � , e � a%i.�'ti'•� - � � ' ' � . G I t2-G..I�� '/�'w � ',.•:`'' o�.Q� i�R.o t�c�-'�'S Gt�, 3 -;;� �.'-' , 'V . . K s w�% • : : ' •, �c� ,�+ ' �� ' , �_ : = , ,, . . ;� . _ _..,-_ : r_c..�. _ . --9.---,,..�-� . _ , _ _ � � � � � � � � � �Q��I�E R S_' C COMMERC/AL AND INDUSTR/AL CONTRAC7'ORS I� �� f N G O R P U R A T E D ,�{W 3427 N. E. HALSEY STR'EET • PORTIAND, OREGON 9723'2 �' MA/L/NG ADORESS: P. O. 80X 133G7 • PORTLAND, OREGON 97273 • AREA CODE 503-235-8681 ' March 11 , 1974 City of Tigard Planning Department City Hal1 � Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' Reference; Fasano Requiremenfi 'Gentlemen: � Purpose of thi� request is to integrate the zoning of this land conforming to your comprehensive plan. The property wil1 then .be a M-4 Zone and the land owned by Fought-Ander�en abutting presently owned M-4 land gives them access of land from the railroad through to S .W. 72nd. ( believe that the necessary public services, such as water services , etc s �� are existing. 1 believe M-4 designation for this property will permit an � attractive development of Fought-Andersen properties to the benefit of neighboring area and City of Tigard. � Very truly yours, - . , ; � l � � �� . , . .��...._--- . J•: Andersen • Andersen-Fought AJA/1JP : � . I i , +� 'i , . � � � � , �:- �. :,�..�� _ _ - - .. _ ,_ __ _ _. . '-` . � ; � � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION � . Staff Report ( ` April 16, 1974 Agenda Item 4.3 . � ZC 6-74 (Alanning) , � 2one Change � , � For property located at 10865 So�J. 95th Avenue & comprising .39 acres. (Tax Map 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 203). Applicant City of Tigard � ' Applicant's Request . � Approval of a chan�e in zoning classification from an existing County RU=4, , ' Urban Residential nistrict to a City R-7, Single Family P.esidential" zone. ' �1n�+� licant's Proposal • To facilitate administration �of T?.gard's planning effort and to carry out the intent of the Tigard Corrnnunit.y Plan by changing existing County zoning to cornParable City zones. �� d'n s . Staff Fin i � g- � 1. Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 227.310 states the followin� with regard to zoning in annexed areas. "Zoning and Land Use regulations applicable to area outside City continue to . apply to area when included within Cii�y until altered or discontinued by City. Zoni�ng or land use ordinances or zoning regulations applicable tn any area not• within a City shall not cease to apply to the area merely Uecause such area is later included within a city, but shall continue to apply until altered or . discontinued by the. legislative body of the City in a manner provided by law." � 2. Tigard rlunicipal Code, Section 18.12.020 Annexations states the following: "Zoning regulations applicable to an area priox to annexation to the Gity shall continue to apply and shall be enforced by the City until a zone change for the area has been adopted by the City Council... 3. The subject property is occupied by one single family dt�elling (see attached map for surrounding land use and zoning.) 4� ,�e T;oard Community Plan designates the subject site as "Urban Medium Density Residential". These areas are intended to '�accomodate the demand for multi-family d�oeliings. �h� 5. The existing County zoning and proposed City zoning are comparable. . ' � Staff Recommendation Approval of the City's request to change an existing zoning classification from County RiJ-4, Urban Residential District to City R-7, Single Family Residential zone. i4 , - � � � � hc� r� e , � .��1 � , ; � � �.: � , j � . , . . ; . � � , �� . C 3 `.�'h� . . 4y . ' � � � � "� . . . I.� , . , i . , �� ; T ;, s�'p . . , . ; � �A�a�l�'t_' S�p,� -1 , � • . ; I � ! � . � , , ; SF'O '� � ��p � �� { � suh�ect . �:�;:site SFC] M S�'b' Y�:� "i1' . VA�c�M'T' - � . o ��o � ' � � � � : _ � . � . � � � . s H ' � . H . . . .... _ � � � . Da ota:� t. . �. . . . _ � : , : ' . � �FD -s►►�� 1 F;AM 1� , . D1KEl.G.t l�-I,G ; ,I �� . . � � : " TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report � April 16, 1974 �� Agenda Item 5.1 M 5-74 Street Vacatior► - S.W• 74th Avenue south of S.W. Cherry and West of S.W. 72nd Avenue ('See attached map.). Staff Findings - . 1. The subject street connects a residential neighborhood with ,an industrially zoned area, 'creating a potential for future conflicts between incompatible residential and industrial txaffic. � 2. A street is necessary to provide access to that industrially zoned land i between the existing S.W. 7l+th Avenue and the• railroad tracks to the west. A potential exists for S.W, 74th Avenue to be extended �oesterly, then southerly, and thence easterly back to S.W. 72nd Avenue, �'his loop wouid provide a loop street giving access to the rear of large � industrial properties: . 3. The City has received a vacation petition from L00'/. of the property owners abutting S.W, 74th Avenue and representing 100% of the frontage. 4. Section 271.120 Oregon Revised Statutes state:s' that the vacation is subje,ct to review on the basis of "whether the public interest was '. prejudi�ed by the vacation of such plat or street or part thereaf." ORS 271.120 ; � continues stating "the governing body may, upon hearing,, grant the �; petition in part and deny it in part, and make reservations, or either, � as appear to be for the public interest. 5, The provision of access to abutting properties and the future �ossibility of a loop access street to the south are in the public interest because af increased �raffic circulation opportunities in an area with poor tra'ffic circulation, and because it will facilitate access by emergency ' vehicles_ to a large area of industrially developed Zands. • Staff Recommendation Approval of the requested vacation for that ,portion of S.W. 74th Avenue , . in south from S.W. Cherr Street to the north line of that portion of runn Y g S.W. 74th Avenue running east and west. ' An additional recommendation would involve changing th� name of the remaining � portion of S.W. 74th Avenue to another name more appropriate to Tigard's : I street name system. . This would require a non-number name. ' i i . , � 'i . • � : � _ J� . i � . . ` � . •.� '+r �d < «,.� • � � Stre-et Vacati�n � � � ` 3S + ,, . - --- �i.--- �;, —�-_._. . _.._ .._. . . ... �+ �_ in l � ��• i �N.N �Ir 1 • ��'• V� r� �p —'-- - ' GOV L01�� . .. . . �� '�. r��F�'�- :� •�rtt. I�o• � � Y . � � •' SW �,...b,� CH ERRY - ..M ,, . . , • ,•'.•• N. ...�......,,.�' = STREET : i p •. .�Y�N'i M�T , � .. .. . . . . � ',+4 � 36 '�O IaBOGYa• �TOO �p00 1`.�0{)� 1400 Ij00• 't;?�i:;' �n•t�. uo• � . � ��-. / i,� , SO w` �� N ' •, , 3T � i • 'K;:°°': � � . �r►�: � � i : : � . .L{�".: • �. �n.. n,iKi[ !fa9 6:.9 . •� • i� � e . . e ��N•ii• - . . . � .' - 38�� 39 S �0 . it E 42 _ � 43 a K��' ' sac �' x? SQ��BU�G SfREET _ .. _ = L L S - �y� � .2"��`� 600 � . � �. - . �:::: . ; ...� - � / •I��'� ;•:¢:" � a �8� �. .�r.�. s ro�. �.,t;;R' � /q.1t ' . . . In111o1 �nl_�' 'K�' ; . . 3301 � -• . . �d.,. •��•a'• 110•e t � — i , � � :•••t:+ . rao .+i � ' ' ( ' 100 1 4 lt f � 1�0�l1 ��Ae, � �r � • . . � �� . . ♦�P 17'• � ' . . p t ��•�t[ �� r _. .... ..•,�. . sw� c�`'-� •�,., .,00 . , �oo � � .._o eoo � „ f.7ll[ ' � w � S�• ... '' '/ � • _ S N R R � . . . � . � � g � _. � I _ ;;L4•.''' Y .. , � �� , i -rf-�C r\ � _ � _ ��-�.�.�1/) r � . � ��' b I � �J �'' ' �/ 1 � J . �� t =JJ1 � • . ::;'? % ' . �' � _ a •rYt �b• .r. ti I� . . ti: . . >�� IrW t��1�.co• a• �� .t �.a p ••. ' � �.v.,...��c s. i `//_ � ��i� � A lw tvE�•OF ww�G�6!+�� 91t �MO !!� _ � _ wr at�. Z � � � � I�- � 1 _ I�' ,` •c� i ioo t��'`� '•+. �.�..� c� oeo .�� w�.�� 7?O Ae. � `h•� . . � . 6. � � _� �. � � � � � t. � � � � �.� �� ,. . . � Y G � � � �� +'~o�b .�� ,?� / � � SEE •M11P , ipp� � . _ 25-1—I � � ��,', � e • �„'``• � . '3 �� I•:'�t ' �Q � tc s w rx • l' � � . - �; t ICS�� . � � . .. . �� . . � . � � . � C\4, ' �1` : �� .. � . . t . . . . . , � . . .. .v .. . . . . � � .. . � ---- . . . . . . . ' . . .- �" awr�t - � .._r----. . ....—..-.._.�----__"'.,._....-,—�--�-..,...—._.. _-�,---.Y...–��..__ . .--•--��.. _� . .._�-_.-� .�.---._...,.��.�3ni. � . . � . _ � � �_� � ,: . ,� • �, ' i, ' TIGARD PLANNING COAIMISSION �� ' , Staff P.eport � ."`�, .pril 16, 1974 �` � � Agenda Item 6.1 � ;�:, . S 1-73 (Englewood - Priase 1) f, �;. Preliminary Plat Approval � i G. For property located south of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and westerly of Fanno Creek. #; ; Applicant , , Commornaealth Properties ' -- ;: Applicant's Request i�pproval of the preliminary plat designating 88 lots for single family d�oellin� units and one 5 acre parcel for multi-family development. . � � Staff Findings 1. On July 9, 1973 the Tigard City Council took action to approve a Planned Development District zone change on the subject site. The submitted preliminary plat conforms to the suUdivision plan submitted by the applicant and approved as a part of the Planned Development District approval. �' 2. On April 2, 1974, the Planning Commission took action to aQprove certain variances to the subdivision standards embodied in Title 17 of the Tigard ` Municipal Code. The submitted preliminary plat conforms to the subject �, granted variances with the exception that utility easements are not shown. i� �.. . k� 3. The street name S.W. Springwood Road does not conform to City street name • �� i, policy. Said policy does not include a "road" designation. Consequently, said street name should read S.IJ. Springwood Drive. ' ,`� 4. The submitted preliminary plat meets a11 requirements for tenative appro��al ;. as defined by Section 17.16.100, Tigard Municipal Code. t` ( Staff Recomrr.nendation ` j!'� Approval of the Engle��ood - Phase 1 preliminary p1at, said approval subject r , to the following plat modifications: ' t, �. �. ° That S.1�I. Springwood Road be changed to read S.Y7. Springwood Drive. ;: �1 ° That the 5 foot utility easements udjacent S.[d. Beechwood Court and �' E'` S.W. Lalcewood Court, as required by the Planning Commission at the related �� April 2, 1974 subdivision va�riance hearin�, be reflected on the final plat, FK i,; ° That a ten foot road right-of-way dedication adjacent S.W: Scholls Ferry Road y�. be reflected on the final plat. Said dedication is required by Exhibit "B" - ji� of Ordinance No. 73-17 as approved by the City Council on July 9, 1973. � � �� i� �. . � ... .::.:...... �.�.>;.,. ,. .. . , _:....,. .. __. . _. . .,:�, �,�j � � �„ ,; `�, �i NOTICE OF PUBLIC H�A1tING � CZ'rY OF TIGARD PLANNIIIG COMMISSION l�atice is heret�y given tha t a publ ic hear ing �vill be held by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard at Twality Jr. High School in the Lecture Room, at 14650 S.3J. 97th Avenue, Tigard� Ore�on, on April 16, 1974, at 7:30 P.r4. with respect to the follo�,�ing:_ A�n application by the City of Tigard for a change o.f zone from t,lashington County RU-4, Urban Residential to the equivalent City of Tigard R-7, Single Family Residential zone. This change of zoning classifications is necessitated by th� xecent annexation of the, subject site to the City of 'Tigard. (Tax Ma� 1S1 35CA Tax Lot 203). All persons having an interest in this matter are invite�i to attend and be heaxd. �` �' ' B . � � f € � '� � ,. s � � � .