The URL can be used to link to this page

Planning Commission Packet - 02/19/1974 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. � ' �,GENTIA � �.� �r�r.ca��n �zL,aNtv�:�� ror��.�G:�arr �?egtz.l.�:r M��t�in�y ��bx°u�x�y :�.9. :�.97�, `�w�'�:ic.y �l�; �Ja�p;l� S,<<:�r�a�,�: w L�:�.�ua�� R�;:sc7,tn �.C�(�50 SsWe 9�1k.h .A-cr�r�t�r�� 'I°:ig�z°�if �x:eg��a.n Pt1tiT�IC HT,Ait't;�TG � D�30 Y,[�1, l., CAL,La ��T UI��R 2� 't�OI..,ta ��T�I� ;3, �.P3,'RQVAT OF MT.Nt�T£5 3,a R�g�u��- ��eting �,f l?�t��ti��:y `'�y �.��4 4, k'I�IB(.��'.0 �S3?..AT�;tt�li� _ �rr!'�e C��ta�a�� t+�o. ;��k�e (�3�� •a .Z�'. 3�f4 �t�f.�.y o� �a.g�r�1 !�. ��sc7i,i�:�t: by �i-��? �:�� of `!''.i��rrf r_cz �.��esg� �xi��idzg C�um»k,y zc��mg r��.GJ�i�*. w.��.0 r4�:w�.y R�s�y��Y�ci ''`'�]��:Y' b��y' �x�;��. �� +�,r��da��a� Gi.�.y .,..�n��o �itr�� s��:,s��, ERy €:a�an�� !�,�,u�at.y I��Jar; (r��.r� �:..1�, �:s��i�� F��s�d�:n�.zca.�. L��..sk.x�.��. t:�� iC� A.,•=7y �ry�a�� '�xmiAy H��i,d��^�ri,�3� Cs,u�rs►,y E�:i.1�1a ��a��i A��;� L��laa� R��;cle�zr.Y��. ��.,rr`��r �;�s �;3ty �y�� Ma�1 �.iaF'�tnz�y R��.i�+�rtxx�� Daskt�i;.:L {:r�� ex��rswy �mk la�rt �:�.3�� e�rr��,,xY?�iSy ��.b-:�.�i.�. G�zn�r:�r��d 1�ia��ic�: a�d C�r�urea�:y F?ry� �a1d C,�2)y f�'��a�xai. �y,s�>��.:si.v�: �r�snm�r�.i,a� �;a.s�a-��:�: �:n �ifiy f,':°3, Gpx�er��. C:c�r�n��e�.�.�t. �;n�;-a�zn2;� �''��: :��k�j��:t �1��°�;,a ti:�irnX�r r',:�a !39.f3; ��:,u�s �x�d i< l c,�r�.�.G��i �nr� �l�e r�.�x�.hta�,zai:pr� Si.�� r�f �zja� I?��.�iii� �li�;h�n��y l��t.w��,ra S�W. k�.�x�l� �l:��x ��'hd S�.td: €:��'s,,atel�:'. �tr,•�vLtr ��;a f� �'a.7�d�.��.�, `.f'��M�,:��:y c�x C'�c►4:� ra��ni�rsx��.�:c�� S��s.tf' �'s�x:c,»�na�.a�ti�7.ari�a;a G��?miY�i�si.aara ��s�::,xs�ic��a c�: ��::ti.cPr 4a� ��n�.� Cb.�az�!� �� ZG 4�74 ((�i t,y �k Ta.��r�i) A r.�qu��k by kh� Cz.�y of `1'ig.�r�l tc� chang� �:�istin:� Caeis��y xanittg �ai�hi.t� th� xxewip �.za.r,�xer� R�:l7.ing Hilll.� ��e� t;�a a°,a•�sesprnnrli�g G�k.y �n��s� �';�fiy pr�apc�se� to �.h�n�e Gou�nty R��w�ap CTr.hasa. R�sidle��ia1 D%sX3�x��: to (;a.ty Ti�7, Sa.ng,l,� 1+amz:Ly �tES��3�nfri�l ,axa� Cc�unl:y MA=i (ald Nf=4), Limf.4eci l�ia,nuEac�tu�i�tg� Pr.aductic�n 1)i;,ct°ict, ta C�.ty C;GP9 Cc�mme�ci.�1 P�raCession�L z�nir�g, `�he .SUbje�:i: :�r�a. R.°�-�n�p�xs�;� bl��l �a;.rPs �na is loc�aC,ed c�n t�a�t.h sid�s ot S�T�d, '>2,rsc3 ��ven��c� lae:��e�:�?. S�W. H��z�•r,i.lc.��r v�.x�eeL a�d S�Wd �;�c�dt�ux�g 5tr��Pt, ��f£ I'anc�ing T�sta.�nc�s�y� � C�o;�s Ex��n�"�.~��s�i.raua Sta.�°£ R�srrncraerad�t�i.�� C�camnti>,sza�n pa.�cc�.��ia�� & H�t,:i.cam� ��' � , , ..,. , : � ;�. . .. . , _ : _ , _ { _„ ._.�._ ;:�: .,... .. _ . ,.. ._ .. . _ __ _.., . .,. € �. , µ � ; I �,, 5, PL1�t,It.; Ea:�ARIN� �n '�'4�:rrp��ary UsF `: ; Stil, 'C'empc�rary €;,�F = `I`T,I �,��4 �T�x,a.l��.�.tx T)�:v�lrpr�Pnt �c�mp�ax�y� ; ; !t xe�u�st by 'Cu��ar.is� �c.vea.t�pm�ratw ('csmp;�x�y, T.s�e.� kca :�til.�rw �-� �,�`rass ; manuf.a�,t+a�-ir�� f�c,a.�at�y �nci uan�t�c:��.i.�r� c��Pi.ce r;4� t�� c�� ra:�,thin t,h� ''S�:�r�mez�t3.�a,.d10 P�.�s�n��d D�av�Zcspm��a� Da:st:��,�.@:4 �°I�e ca t;� i.�s �c��kcc3 east c�f. 5..�+7n 109kh ��vE:�.��e s�g�ro��rr�t€�a,y 1� f�+�� '3l.St�l'Il �af �,tJ� lv.�Rv�� St;��, ; �� ('S'�,k; ��`?�. iS?. :lODt?�, T'{�x ],s�t 1�a0�,�r �; ,, i: {- Sr._a�.. ��'a.�c�a.,,�s f. `[.',P.S�1,ClICi�:�y' �te Z';'!?S.`r rk:i�1T1.Lt�.r�t 7.JSl f', Staff 1>�e��crmmNm�d�Li„c�� ,'' �c�mr�issa.on Uir°�:�a.s:��.csc� �x. �Ls;4`iGn � �i ,, i'! �., Y�r��.zc i;��a�xr�r; .� �r��.�� r:, fJ C � � F,1, V��,��a�r��c�, .., V '?.R p 3� t{'�z,r'�'�� A�4d Prcaa��e�r�� (��.p�.��ay) ��i �!1 ;� A rcc�a��: t�v Ci�p...h.�e A��,� P�o�3��,r.., Cr��n��r�,y tc� ��N��:��c,�. �� c3�� .an �:�a� thei�- �:�i.�ti�G l�Wi.l�:;s,;�� <,az� ,°�,cic�i.t.%con �a�,pc�..;,�r.� tc� !��v�� :� 9..2 f�e�" �`��w y�N� Fa ,�t�.�a�k �?�:c�x�:: � 2�3 �'��. sc�t�ba 1<: i:y �a�,s��inc�,, �'1-y� �r.�p�x�y i:5 �csn�r� bl��?, �:1 �r.SAi�PD,.'.'�� ,E.S�I�i�ti�s.r�..7.t. �.n.cl �.� �C.�a:,�.�'..£.;j ��.r. .n.3�$F3S S�Y,i„ �:?r��l ?�v��.r.uc�< ;`i;;�W� �5,��, �.'�. .��S 1 �.T3(;,� i',i'?< T,.,n�t' 1.�f)0��, � (,'{ ''i � S��ff Ti�•:i:��s �s '�'��.l i�rs�a ny fi, C�;�r�� :�!�i c�.�e t.�.,ar , S��fi kier.�crur�ea�d:3�.ar:� �,�'��ri�;.s;c�n 1.)i�a'.:a�a�a c,r� & ;'ls:t:�r.a'ra , °P, S�'x"G l�i'sVL^'GUI'C2r�z PLr�N I�,EV'[[;?J � �,� � i. �. 7�Et4;'d:c l3#?�l� = SI}� i,� Flz ti� � ��r,;r,,=?tiG4�� ,h�J;.fs:.�r��. i�� 2n� r;ra�th �a� 'F'��.�x�x �.�r Drav��:;v� `!`l�a.-:��'a �r�kr�ir,.�r��,� (��.K M�ip �.Si .:S'i��r `l"�X 1,.�,�1; l`:�O()�. �L-x�ft eincii.IZns St�Ef N�c,c.mlKnexxd�ti.c�r� � t;o ,r�t:i..sv ir�n n?s��.r:;sa.�.��. �a !�r�.a.c�tx �, 1`41'S�L1:.�Ai�7L�C�LiS �inl 'ni..scr�;;�i��n ;�f" p.c�pc��rJ sigr� �.��clt: �'nrriszcs��, ��ir'2 1)i g�u��zc�sa �f fikYec�t a�c1 r.c�act �v3.�.cy< � "., ? �lppo�.nr�ne:za�; rrf X'��nni.ng Cc�m�ni��.cax� x�p�r��:A6��afi:.��'s°:v� t��s NT'0 1k2� ( � ! � � I i pA4J�.' 2 r. p(,; �1.1�T�:NJ.A. � I'el��u.�ry k9, 1.y7�� n` ' � , � . • . . . . ., , , � . .:_. 1 � -- � i � Y .a _' rtzz�uT�as TIGARD 1'LANIVINC� COMNIISSION '� Regulaz Meering � February 19, 1974 �. `l�Caa�.ii;y Jx. High Schao], - L�cture Room 14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, `Pigarc�, Oregon 1. CE1L� TO QR.DER A. Thc meeting was caLled to order at 7s40 1'.M. 2. ROLL GALL A. Members pres�nta �all, Barichurst, P'xazier: rlansen, Mickelson, Nicoli, Sakata; Chairman 6�hitkaker; i?1a�nin� Director Bxoolcs; Associate P1ant�er Bolen; City ��torney Anderson. B. Absent: Cotrnnission.er Hartman. 3. A.PPR�VAL OF MINUTES A. Approval of. the minutes of the �'ebruary 5, 1974 meeting was tabled to the F�t�ruary 26th p].anni.ng session in that they were da.stributed at this meeting< 4. PUBLTC HE��.RTNG - Zone Chan.ge �- 4.1 7one Chal�ge - 2C 3-74 (Gity of 'Cigard) � p A reques� by the City of Ti.gard to change existing County zoning withi.n the nec�ly annexed "l�erry Dell" area ta corresp�nding Cit�y zones. City praposes to change Cou�ty RU�4 (oLd R-7}, Urban Residential District to City R-7, 5ingle Family Residentialp County Rt7-20 (old A-2) Urban it�sidential L7istrict Go City A-2, MultieFarnily Residential District and County B�2 (olcl C-3), Commur►ity RetaiL Commercial Disi:zict and Co�rnty B-4 (old C-2), General �xtensi.v� Commercial Distr.ict to City G3, General Commercial zon�.ng. T1�� subject area camprises 89,87 acres axid is located on the northwestern side af S.GJ. Pacific Highway between S.W. Pa•ric Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. A. Staff Findings , 1. Brooks pxesented tk�e staff f.zndings relevant to this case, � B. Testimony and Crass Examination � i � l. Maxtha Bishop asked thafi the Chaixman in�roduce each member of the ; PZanning Commissian and state wha� qualifications were required for appoin�ments to th� Corrnnission. 2, Bi].1 Heppner of S.W. Watkins Street testi£ied st�ating hzs vp�osition to tk�e chaixge �'rom County to City zoning� ancl pres�ented a letter to the Commission spelling out his objections. Mx. tieppner stated that the Ci.ty wisl�es t4 change the zone to R-7 whi.ch allows a 7,000 �quaxe �oot lot. � When Dexry De11 was cieveloped in Washington Cnunty, i.t was plated with 15,000 square £oot Lots az�d the change to City zoning wouLa aLiow a smal..ler. lak than is now the rule in this• axea. .. ,,, . .. . ... .. . .. . . ..: �� , � . . . .. , _ .. _ , .. . �'; . 3. Chairman Whittaker pointed out to Mro Heppner that the existing �� . County zoning, RU-4, allaws a smaller lot size than the pxopased �r, City zona.ng. (7,000 versus 7,500 squaxe foot rninimum lat area). �; Whittalcer then stated the zoning designai�ion is a minimum and the �:'. area was developed at the larger lot si.ze on septic tanks. (;: �:. � r; 4. Wilbuz Bishop af S.W. Caolc asked why the change was heing made at this t; time ixom County ta City zoni�g when the Ciky anticipated doing a �+' ;:, neighborhood plan in thenear £uture �nd possibly rezaning again after i�i completion of this pLan. �f; (' 5. Fred Anders�n pointed out that; the action being considered is not r''� xezon9.ng praperty but changing the zoning designators from the Coun ty ;;,i system to the City system. Any actual rezoning would be the outcome of `''I the nei�hborhood plan where the use permiCted would be changed by changing �I the actual zoning designation. �'I 6. Wilbur Bishop stated that if any change is ma.de in the existing zoning by �he City it should be to R-15 and not to R-7 in that R-15 reflects � the existing development pattern in the neighborhood. 7. BaLI replied to Mr. Bishop's comments stati.ng that the Planning Commission da:d not have this discretion in that the application which has been submitted by the City was not for a change to R�15 but to R-7. In order to change the zone to the R-l.5 designation, the Planning Comcnission must receive an application from either the City or thE property owners before this consideration can be made. In addition, he stated, there is a need to change from County ta City jurisd9.ctian in that it could be as long as a year before a neighborhaod plan guiding £uture zaning could be ` adopted. � `� r 8. Joyce Riekex of Watkins 5treet spoke stating her oppositian to seeing any apax'tment or busi�ess development onto the large vacant parcels adjoining Park and Watkins Stxeets. 9. Jim Ash stated that the City A-2 zone would be in effect lowering the density on the parcels aoned for apartments in the County. I£ this �` ,s were true for apartment parcels, could not then the single :Camily `± property density be lowered by changing the zonP from R-7 to R-15? �l: I:' 10. Whittaker replied that the effort is to change the county designators r to the near.es� city zones. In the case of the county RU-20 zone, the � A-2 is the nearest equiva�,ent zone. � � 11. Helen Thomas of Watkins Street asked if the committee would be appoin,ted !� tn recommend on futurn zone crian$es. �w I: F .12. Whittaker repla.ed that the nea.ghborhood plannin� organizatian would be electecl by the residents o•f the neighborhood and the plan which they �� would develop for the �n,eighborhood wouLd ultimately recommend the necessary � zone changes to implement their prpposals. � 13. I3i11 McMonagle of Rose Vista Drive spoke in response to Mrs. Thomas� � . question!�stating that the City was offering a chance for the residents �; o£ the neighUorhood to give input into the p;lanning process prior to the � public hearing stage. He poi�nted out that this is a valuabl.e sexvice being of,fered by the City az�d one that the neighborhood shoul.d take advantage of. PAGE 2 - COMMISSION MINUTES - FFBRUAttY 19, 1974 � . _. _ �, ,. ._ , . ... L., G. Sta£f Recommenclation �y l. Brooks recommended approval of the City's reques� to change existing `�� county zoning classa.£ica�.ions to compa�able city zones as followss a. A11 County TtU-4, Urban Residenti:al DisCrict ta Ca:ty R-7, Single Tamily ltesid'ential. zone, b. All County RU-20, Urban R�sidentiaJ. District to City A-2, Multi- �'ami.ly Residet►tial zo�e. c. All Coiinty I3-?_, Community Retail Cammercz�al and a11 �:aunty B-4, G�nexal Nxtensive Commercial to Gity C-3, General Commercial zone. D. Comma:ssion Discussion aizd �ction l. Baxkhurst moved to t��ble consideration of thi.,s xequest to tlle next regular meeti:ng of March 5, 1974. Mickelson seconcled and the m.otion �assed by unanimous �ro�.e of a11 members Present. 2. H�nsen moved to iristruct tlze staff to study changing the R-7 areas to R-15. Sakata seconded �nd the motion passed by the unanimous vote of all members present. 4�2 Zone Change e ZC 4p74 (City af Tigard) ; i � A request by the City of Tigard to change existing Gounty zUning within the � ,� newly annexed P�olling Hi1.1s area to correspondin� City zox�es. Ciky proposes � �.o change County RU�-4, Urban Residential District to Gity R-7, Singl.e �amily , Residential and County MA-1 (old M-4), Llmited Manufacturin�-P�od�!ction Di�trict to City C-P, Commercial Pxofessional zoning. Tl��e subject area I comprises 61..7 acres az�d i.s lacated on both sides oL• S.W. 72nd Avenus t�etween S.W. Hunziker Str.eet and S.W. San�i�urg Street. A. StaFf Finclings� � �� 1. Broolcs presented staff findings r.elevatat to thi.s request. � � �, B. Testimon.y & Gxoss �xaminatzon � t. l. There was no;.public testimony �ffexed coz�cexning this item. � �' G. Staff ttecammendation � I r 1. �Bzooks recommended a�proval o� the Ci ty's reques t t4 ck�an,ge exis ting � Cqunty zoning cLassifications ko compa�rable City zones as Eol.l.ows: a. All Caur�ty RU-4, Urban Residential 'Dist�ict to a Ca.ty R�7, Single � S�amily Resi.dential zone. � � b. The existing MA-1, Zimited Manufacturing-Producti.on District, � containing two office structures, to C-P, Commercial Pxo£essianal � �ones, � �- PAG� 3 - COTKMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 19, 1974 � � ": . . . . � . � . . � . . . �� . � � .. . � - . i . � . . . . . . . . i. , � ;. ._. . . .. ., ..' . . . . . ... . . .:.�. .. .. . . .. . . . . . I . ..,....�. ... .... . .. _ �.......�,.. ..,.._ ...... . ... . ... . .. . _ . . ... . .. .� 1,�d ![' -, � • j',�I, �. Commission Aiscussion and Action �;, " � 1. Barkhurst muved to table consi.deration of this request ta the next ° regular meetirrg on March 5, 1974. Mickelson seconded and the motian �;' �,_ passed by unanimous vote of a11 members present. f r, 5. PUBLIC HFARING � Temporary Use �� . �', 5�1 Tem�orary Use - 'CU 1-74 (Tualatin Aevelopment Company) ;; A request by TLialatin Development Company, Inc. to allow a truss manufacturzng facility and construction office to be located within the "SummerfieLd" ' Planned Development District.. The site is located east of S.W. 109th Avenue, � apgroximately 75 feet south �f S.ti�. Naeve Street. (Tax Ma� 2S1 IODD, Tax Lat �' 1400). j. A. Staff P'indings � i I. Brooks presented staff findings relevant to this casee ! � x B. Testimony and Cross Examination s 1. Proponents ! � a. No ane spoke in favox o� the request, 2. Opponents a. No one spoke in opgosition of. the xequest. �`°- C. Commissi�n D�scussion and Action 1. Ball. asked what happened after 3'u1y, 1973, the period when the length of �cemporary use granted by the County expired. 2. Brooks zeplied that the temporary use expixed at that ta.me and this fact had now come to the City's attention that the County ha;d placed , a time linnit on this use. 3. Ba11 then asked if the City had ever received a tempoxary use application from the Tualatin Development Company after this prop�rty was annexed to the City. 4. l3xooks said the Ci.ty had received .no application. 5. Whittalcer asked iL any complai�ts had been xeceived concerning �his use to clate. 6. Brooks replied that no compl�ints had been xeceived. 7. Ball a�ked what TDG�s es�imate was for the �i.me that this use w�uld have to be carried on for completion o.f �he Summex.'f.ield Project. 8. Brooks said TDC estimates the project time frame to be a tY�ree to £ive � yeax period. PAGE 4 - COMMZSSTQN MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1.9� 1974 Y� . , _. . . . .� � . , , 9, Bal1 then aslced Brooks if he did no,t thinlc that the �russ manufacturing operation cauld not Uecome incompatible with land use which may locate on adja�ent parcels before the completion of the Summar£iel� Pxoject. � 10. Brooks replied that this was a dzstinc� possibility. 11. Ba11 then stated his preference thaC the Planning Cammission have an '� opportunity to review the use of this property every six months to see II t�at incompatible conditions do not accur. He then asked the Crty '� Attorney if the Plan.ning Gommi�sion is pexmitted to a1Zaw a manufacturing II use in a residential zone. I l2. Fred Anderson replied that he would need time to thoroughly examine the ordinance vefore providing atx answer to this question. I 13. Na.coli stated that truss manufacturing is but one step in the total �I process of buildin�; a hause and is eompa�.ibLe with home building, a use i now beis�g carried out in the Summerfield Px�oject,. He then stated his ' prefexence for the Planning Commission re-exr�mining this usa at the end 4f. a one year period. ].4. �Ir. Andersnn stated his opininn that the �equested tempoz�ary use does I�i amount to manufacturing in a residential ..one. 15. Ball moved to approve the kemporary use for a six month period at the end of which time the Pla,nr.ing Commission would review its com�atibility wiLh surrounding land use. Nicoli. seconded. 16. Hansexi amended 33a11's motion to state that ths use would be granted � for a one year period. Barkhurst seconded. 17. Ball asked that his motion not be amended and that this motion be voted Un prior to any amendment or motion by Hansen. 18. Chairman Whittaker then directed that the vote be taken on Ba11's motion. The motion failsd by a majority vote. 19. Chairman WhitL-alcer then asked that Hansen's proposed amendment be voted on as a moti.on with Hansen and Barkhurst doncurring. This motion passed by a majority vote with Sakata abstaining. 6. PUBLIC HEARTNG - Variance 6.l Variance - V 7-73 (Circle A-W Products Company) A request by Circle A-W Products Company to construct an addition to their existing building, said addition proposed to have a 12 foot reax yard sett�ack �ohere a 20 foot satback is required. The pxopexty is zoned M-2, General Industrial and is located at 13885 S.W. �2nd Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 1DC, Tax Lot 1100). A. Staff Findings l. 13rooks presented the sta£f f:t�ndin�s relevant to this rpquest. �. PAG� 5 - COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 19, 1974 � .. _ .. ,. . ,. . -, , . _ -, . _ . „ - , , ,., : � q �. B. Testimony and Cross �xamination • 1. Propoz�e�ts � a. Ron Loew, Attorney for the applicant, spolce poi.nting out that Circle A-W Proclucts Campany is willing to meet the intent of the setbAcks required by prov3.din� setbacics in the form o£ private easements an the adjacent parcels. He said that tYiis would xesult: iri the required setbacks be�aeen building, if not from property li.nes, when the deveLopablP land is occupied with structures. He said that he is now in the process of drawing up the necessary leg�tl instrumen�� and negatiating with the adjacent property own,ers involved and will have these by the MarGh 5th, 1974 Pl.anning Commission public r►earing. 2. Cross Examina�ion a. Ba.rkhurst aslced Mr. Loew if he knew the history o£ the deveLopment � of this property and how the axisting building was placed 12 feet from the property line when 20 £eet is required. b. Mz. Loe�e saa.d that he i.s not aware of how this occurred, but feels ; likely this occurxed when tl�e area was in the counfiy and subject to its zox�ing jurisdiction. 3. Opponent� i . a. No one spoke in oppositi.on to the request. C. Staff Recommendation i �� f 1. Brooks recommended that this item be tabied to the next Planning Commission meeting, March 5, 1974. D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Ball moved to tabl.e this item to the ne�:t regular meeting of March 5, 1974 � and Nicoli secondsd. Mation was passed by unanimous vote of the mernbers i present. � f 7. SITE DEVELOPM�NT PLAN R�VIEW � � 7�1 Taco BeLl - SDR 2-74 ; Location: Adjacent to and south of I'amily Drive-In Theater en�.rance (Tax Map l51 36DB, Tax Lo� 250Q). A. Staff I'indings l. Brooks xeported tha� the problems relating to the easement on the east property line adjacent that is now used by the Family Drive-In Theater and Webber's Aance Studio, have not been resolved and this 3.s a problecn which must be attended to; representing somewhat o£ an access jumble. i He w�ent on to state, however, that the Site Development Plan for the Taco Bell and Dunlcin Donuts could be approved in that they do have acc�ss � directly onto Pacific Highway. Access via the adjacent easement could be worked out a� a later date. PAGE 6 - CdMMTSSION MINUT�S - I'�BRUARY 19, 1974 �-:, ., _ __ __ _ _ _ . � , �. Sta�'f IiECammendation l. I3'rooks zecommez�ded approval of the submitted plan. wi.th two suggested � ' modifa.cations. a. Thnt the access poin� to the ea,sement be landscaped if with:in six months this access point is not utilized. Ya. T2aat the dr�p box lacation pe maved ta l�a accessible £rom the par.king lot ra�her than trom the easement. C. Commission Aiseussion at�d A.clion 1. Bark�urst moved to appxo�ve the sutmiitted site development plan to include the staff recommendations, that the dxcrp box lora�ion be moved and the access point from tha park�.ng lat to the easem�nt be land�caped i.f tha.s access is not utilizad w3.thin a six month period. This motion was seronded by Nicoli and pas��d by a unan�:mous vote o.f tl�.e members present. 8a MISCELLAN�OUS 8a1 Discussion of Propasecl Sign Cocle Revisio�ls. A, Mro Gaxy Neaxson of the Txansit Bench Sign Company was pxespnt and spoke in favor of the �roposed or.dinance wJzich would amend the `�igard Sign Code to a11ow the placement of ben�h signs at transit stops. I�Ie did specify some specif3.c changes which he £elt the Plannzng Commission should consider. ' �, Z'herc: w�x'e as follows s ' ;+'' 1. That a 42 a.nch height be aLlowed rathex than a 39 inch height to confarm j �>-_- to his company's standard size. i 2. That a provision be addecl xequiring the bench sign companies i:o have � .liabila.ty insurance. 3. That there be a pravision restricting the subject matter of the si.gns. 4. That in addition to placing benches in commerc�.al zones, that they also ; be allowed iz� apartment� zones due to the need in this type of location. � � B. Chazrman Whittaker thaniced Ma:. Nearson for his r.omments and asked the staFf ` to considex includ�ng these con9i.derations in a xevised sign ordinance to ; be presPnted far Planning Commission review on February 26, 1974. z �� 8�2 Discus�z.on o� Street and Road Policy. � �. A. M3,ck.elson ciistributed his recently completed street and road pol.icy study � for considexation by the Planning Commission. He stated that as a xesult of hi.s study he saw the City faced with three altexnatives: � i i Z. �stablislz a�. annual pragram for. xeconstructi.on of stxeets £inanced from = general taxes dt no expense to abutting praperty ownexs, � i 2. Establish an annual program �or reconstruction of stree�s f.inanc�d , �, jointly Uy the Ciky and abutting property owners< 3. Accept existing conditians and apply a minimum amount of �unds to mai�tain s treets. k'AG� 7 - COMM7SSION MINUTL'S - F�BRUARY 19, 1974 .. r p B. Ba1l, stated that a system prescxibing mea�s of financing and assessing street impravements should pzecl.ude bax'terin� at Council meetings. That is, the system should raise the process above the political arena. �'" C. After a discussion of how ta define the varying street types, Mr. Whittalcer aslced thak each membex come to February 26th planning session with� theix notes and comments reacting to Mickelson's study in order to provide a foundation for the staff to draf t a policy for the Planning Commission to � consider. � 8.3 l'xo�ress Report Qn NPO ��2 PLan ' � A. Bolen reported the NPO`s progzess to date sta�ing that the group had I defined the curzent and anta.cipateci problems relating to the development o£ the neighUorriood and had developed policies for each land use category. ' Following the completion of thi� process a concept plan has been developed and has been passed on to the traffic consultant to test out the capability of the proposed system to serve the neighborhood. 9. ADJOURNEMNT - 10:35 P.M. I i ; i . � �u �.✓ PAG� $ �- COI�KISSION M�NUT�S - k'EBRUARY L9� 1974_ - �.-- _ - _ r. , . . '�'IGAItD PLANNTNG COMMISSION � Staff Report #`.: February 19, 1974 Agenda Item 4.1 ZC 3-74 (City of "Cigard� Zone Ghange For properties within the area commonly known as the "Derry Dell" area, generally lacated on the riorthwestern side oF S.W. Pacific Highway between S.W. Park Street and S.W. Gaarde Street and compri.sing 90 acres. Applicant � City o�f '�iga�rd � � �s 1 i Appli�ant's Request ` ; � Approval of a change in zoning classifications from the existing County '. zoning to comgarable City zones. Those requestect changes are summarized ' as foll.ows: ' Existing County Zoning ProPosed City Zoning ; a From: RU-4 (old 'R-7), Urban Residentia� To: R-7, Singl.e Family Ttesidential �.; Diskr.ict ; � ' ItU-20 (old A-2), Urban Residential A-2, Multi-family ResidentiaL � Dis txic� B-2 Community Retail Commercxal District C-3, General Commercial ; (o1d C-3) � B•4, General Ext�:nsion Comme�cial C-3, General Commercial. ;:; District (old C-2) A= E', r F Aprplicant's Proposal `' Y t� To facilitate admi.nistxation of Tigard°s zoning code by bxi�g3.ng..Coun,Gy zoning into conformity with �he City's zoning ordinance. Staff F'indin�s 1. Oregon Revised Statcates, Chapter 227.310 states the fol.lowing wifih regard to zoning in annexed areas. t "Zanin� and Land Use xe�ulations applicable to area outside Gi.ty continue to apply tv area when included within city until. altered or disconitinued �b� city. 2oning or land use oxdinances or xoning � regulatians applicable to any area not within a city shall. not cease to apply to the area mezely because such axea is Later ineluded within a city, but shall con.tinue to apply until altered or discontinued i �; by the legislative. body of the City in a manner provided by Law." } z f i � � � � � ; _ . , , _ ; �� . Page 2 Staff Report - ZG 3r74 {City of Ta.gard) • 2. Tigaxd Municipal Gc�de, Section 18.12.020 Annexations states the , f'c,llowing: �. "Zoning xegulations appla.cable to an area prior to annexation to the city shall continue to apply and sha11 be enforced by the City until a zone change far the axea has been adopted by the ca.ty cauncil...�� 3. Generally, the propased zone changes involve a strip of commercially zoned Land adja4ei�t S.W. Pacific Highway averagix�g approximately 200' €eet in depCh along S.W. Pacific Highway; twa areas of multi-family zonPd land adjacent SW Park Street and SW Gaaxde Street and situated between the corrnnercially zoned land°�and 'the remainder of the "Derry Dell" neighbarhood which is zoned for single f.amily residential use. Land across SW Pacif�.c Highway from the subject area is zoned predominately C-3, General Commercial. {See attached map). � 4. �he e�cisting land use pattern within the subject area is described as fol.laws: Adjacex�t SW Paci£i.c High��ay: Mixed cpmmercial� reside�tial and vacant land. Some older single famiLy houses mixed with gas stations (3), an: equipment rental store, and a used appliax�ce firm. Interi.or of "Derry Dell" axea is ptedaminately sin�gl.e family �re�idential. 5. The Ti�ard Community Plan clesignates a strip nf land approximately lOQO feet deep along SW Pacific Highway for residential-cocmnercial use, the Pl.an atating "this category is intended to aceomadate higher density dwelling structures, incLuding high-riss apartments, combined with a range of �� comQatible office and business uses." The Flan desigx�ate� the remain�er of the neighborhood Urban Low Density Residenti.al, the P1an stating "the predominant use in these areas wi�l be 5ingle-Family housing." Objectives, Policies and 5tanda¢�ds f,or each of the aforementioned Plan designations are descri.bed in the Plan document. 6. The "Derry De11" neighborhood will be included within the neighborhood plan area now scheduled far a pla�ning effort commencing �ext manth and scheduled for completion in October, 1974. 7. The existipg County zoning designatfons and the City zoning designations are rough.ly equivalent with the foll.owing exceptions: County KU-20 (old A-2) - allowable density 27 tanits/net acre. based on building type and lok coverage. Czty A-2 - allowable densit.y 12 units/gross acre. County B-4 (o1d C-2) General Extension Commexeial District. permitted uses: Any itetail Business; Parking Garages & Passengez Terniinals; Wholesale Businesses; Manufacturing and Processing� provided their entire out�ut is sold on the premises; Buildin,g Su�ply, Equipment �� Establishmex�ts, Retai.l Lumber Yards, Service �stablishments;� Automobile Sales Showrooms & Lots; Recreation Vehicle Sa1es �howroams � Lots; Drive- xn Business; Farm Implement, Truck & Heavy Equipmex�t Sal�s Showrooms & Lots; Mobile Home Sales Lots & Service Facilities; Veterinary Hospitals; Opsn Air Businesses; O�fices; Inst�tution.al Uses; Automobile & Yehicle - Repa�x, �Velding Shop & Automobile Service Paxt Facilities. page 3 S'taff Report - ZC 3-74 (City of Tigar�) � City G3, Gc�neral Commerci.aL f . P�rmitted Uses: See Attached f)rdinance �, Conditianal Uses. See Attached Ordi�ance Staff Reaommendation Appxoval of the City's request to change existing Gounty zoning classificati�ns to comparable City zones as follows: ' . A11 County RU-4, Urb�n Residential District to City R-7, Single Family Residential zone. . Al1 County RU-20, Urban Residential District to City A-2, Mu1ti-Family Residential zone. . All County B-2� Community Retail Commercial & all County B-4, General Ext�nsive Commercial to City C-3, General Commercial zone. �'I �_ � . �. .. ,� - � �:� � _ � - , ,.. ,� .._�. . ., ....., :....;; �r . L � � � � �, � . - ` , ; , ..� � I� r, � ► � � � � � � �� .� ■ I j�� y. • �� . .!� - � �► � ,� ,�' 1.� ► � �► . �� , ��eer ��:� _ �..�� .��,, �� I `►� � � : � �;� �, � �,,.� .»�.��.� -,��►.�� . � � � � • �. r , �I � , c' ,� � . i; ■ � \r ,�,,- �� ! � � � � � ,� � � S' �� , a � ,`►�� ■ �' � ,, ,� � 1 ' • � � ' ' � � fF 1. ,��.r . ��/1� ' . 1 eo� � � ' � ��}�� 1 �• 1 � �; •• � ► '" , ; t �s ' •1'I .,.r � �f � - ;', t ` /, � � � � , r � d , -' ' ' '� �;`. � : �- �� '' � � A � �� . ..: ' �I � �� /�i�� ;: � �� P. , . ;. , � . � � . , , , �� r � �.,� �., ' �/�r� e � ;.f s�. ,�� . � ± . , , � � � . ■ , �- ► �•. ��..�� , ► , � �� / �� r f � � �� .�� . :¢ � f•• � �� ,. � . . . � .� �1 �,. / / t�o-.r.:+�,_ :„nj:.tY.v.YyyX:ia^tr,'�t�a:rrr R-vaP 1 � � , ��' 1 f/ �� : 1 • �� t;� ; p' "��i ' ■ �} ;5 �r� . • � � _ :� . �e �� • ,� ` .w�..a•wrt.:^.-ys.q •�r�� .i�pl�'.b�:Af:�w�Hl.+h�:.. :.�w Ei4'�'.�=a °.� � `� 1 '' v � �' � 1 ,. . �. � � �° - � � � � ♦ J'!' tr �` �" `� ..�-.""'"�..�►r�! f; , , I � ~� � ` � : s • '°�e � , . . • I. ' e �� e Y ' i 18.24.050--18.28.O1D t�, any given point shall not be less than the sum of the required side yards computed separately for each building at that point. (Ord. 70-32 §120-4, 1970) . 18.24 .050 Building height. Except as otherwisE pro- vi�ed in Section 18 .12. 110 , �o building in the A-2 zone shall exceed a height of two stories or thirty feet whichever is less. (Ord. 70-32 �120-5, 1970) . 18.24. 060 Additional requirements. Additional require- ments applicable in the A-2 zone include but are not limited to the following: � _ (1) Off•°street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60 ; I ' (2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18.64; (3) Apartment dwellings, (provided that any common �, boundary between an A-2 zone and any other residential zone � be screened by a fence obscuring the sight of normal adjacent pedestrian and vehicular traffic, the erection of which shall be the responsibility of the property ownership in the A-2 zone. Also Section �8.12.080) ; , � (4) Signs, advertising signs and sign structures shall ;I be subject to the conditions, limitations, prohibitions and ', requirements of Title 16, to which particular reference is ; . , made; (5) Fire z�nes , see Section 18.12 .120; I � (6) Nuisances prohibited, see Section 18. 12 .070 . (Ord< � , 71-4 �7 (part) , 1971; Ord. 70-32 �120-6, 1970) . Chapter 18. 28 � GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-3) * � Sectioris: � 18: 28.010 Permitted uses. 18. 28.020 Conditional uses. � 18. 28.0�0 Lot requirements. . . � � 18. 28.040 Setback requirements. . 18. 28. 050 . Building height. 18.28. 060 Additional requirements. ' 18.28.O1D Permitted uses. No building-structures- or---- -° land shall be used and no building .or' structure shall here- after be erected, enlarged or altered in the C-3 zone except ! for the fallowing uses: * For sign regulations, see Chapters 16 .36 and 16 .40 of � � this code. 267 � 18.28.020 � ' ( '1) Any use permitted in a C-4 zone; ( 2) Appliance store (incidental repairs only) ; • ' ( 3) Banlc, loan campany, or othe� financial institutxon; ( 4) Blu�printing, photostating or other reproduction process; , ( a) Business machines, retail sales and service; ( 6) Commercial schools such as business colleges, � music conservatories and trade schools� - ( 7) Department or furniture store; ( 8) Film exchange; I�� ( 9) Frozen food lockex (family use only) ; (10) Hotels; (11.) Instruments, scientific or professional (repair shop) ; (12). Jewelry store; � f13). Medical-dental clinic; (14) Motel; ' (15) Motion picture �heater (not drive-in) ; (16) Newsstand; (17) Professional or commercial office building; (�18) Real estate office; (19) Record shop; (20) Restaurant (except drive-inj ; (21) Sporting goods store; . (22) Variety store. (Ord. 70-32 �140-1, 1970)�. �` � 18. 28.020 Conditionax uses. In the C-3 zone the follow- ing uses and their accessory iases are permitted as conditional uses when in. accordan�e with Chapters 18.72 and 18. 84: ( 1) Any conditional use as permitted in a C-4 zone; , � ( 2) Amusement en.terprise, including billiard . or pool- hall, bowling alley, boxing arena, dance hall, public swimming • pools; � ( 3) Auditorium, exhibition hall or other public assembly; ( 4) Au�omobile and trailer sales area; ' ( 5) Automobile parts, accessory sales; ( 6) Automobile repairs, painting and upholstery; . ( 7) Catering establishment; . ( 8) Churohes and accessory uses; ' ( 9) Cleaning establishment; , (10) Colleges; . (11) Community buildings (public) ; . (12) Drive-in business offering goods and services di- rectly to customers waiting in parked motor vehicles; . (13) Drive-in theater; (14) Feed store; (15) Governmental structures or land uses not including schools; . . (16) Hospitals, convalescent, general, home for the aged; (17) Hotel (residential) ; � � � 268 _,�...:.: ... . ....,,.. _ 18. 280030--18. 28.060 (18) Libraries; �,F-��, � � Z19) L�dges, fraternal organizations; (20) Lumber yard; {21) Museunis; (22) Parks and playgrounds (public) ; (23) Pet shop; (24) Plumb: ng, electrical or general contractor and shop; (25) Printing shop and newspaper publishing; (26) Private club; � {27) Radio or T.V. service; (2 8) Secox�dhand .store; (29) Tavern or cocktail lounge; (30) Tire shop and retreading; _ • (31) Veterinarians office or animal hospital; (32) Any business, service, processing, storage or dis- play essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C-3 zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building. ' (Ord. 70-32 §140-2, 1970) . � 18.28.030 Lot requirements. In the C-3 zone the lot requirements shall be as follows: (1) The minimum lot area shall be six thousanci square feet; (2) The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet; : (3) No maximum lot coverage shall be required. (Ord. � 70-32 �140•-3, 1970) . 18. 28.040 Setback re uirements. Except as may other- wise be provi e in Section 18. 12. 100 , the setbacks for non- residential uses in the C-3 zone shall be as follows: (1) The minimum front yard shall be ten feet, land- scaped and maintained; (2) No side yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone, a side yard of five feet shall be required; (3) No rear yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone, a rear yard setback of twenty- five �feet shall be required. ' (Ord. �2-34 §4, 1972; Or�. 70- 32 §140-4, 2970) . 18. 28.050 Building height. Except as otherwise pro- vided in Section 18. 12. 110, no building in the C-3 zone shall exceed a height of three stories or thirty-five feet which- ever is less . (Ord. 70--32 §140-5, 1970) . 18. 28.060 Additional requirements. Additional require- ments applicable to the. C-3 zone include but are not limited to the following: (1) Oft-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60 ; (2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18.64; (3) Enclosure and screening required, �ee Section 18.- �., 12 .0 8 0; , 269 ---- (Tigard 10/:15/72)-- -- __ _� —,x,.,--,� , _ TIGARD kLANNING COMMISSION Sta£f Repoit � Febr�uary 19, 1974 Agenda Item 4.2 ZC 4-74 (City of Tigard ) Zone Chan�e For pXOperties within the area commonly knowr� as the °1Ro11ing Hi11s" area, generally located along both sides of S.W. 72nd Avenue between SW Hunzikex Str�et and SW Sandburg Street and comprising 62 acres. A�plicant City of Ti�,ard Applicant's Request Approval of a change in zon3ng classification from the exis�:ing County zoni�g � to comparable City zones. Those requested changes are summarized as followss Existing County Zon3.ng Proposed Gity Zoning . From:RU-4 �old R-7), Urban Residential District To: R-7, S.ingle Family Residential � MA-1 (old M-2-3-4), Limited Manufacturing C-P, Commercial Professianal Producti�n District �' Appl.icant's Pro�asaL To facilitate adminxstration of Tigard's zoning code by bringing County zoning into conformity with the City's zoning ordznance. Staff Fin�ings 1. Oregan Revised Statues, Chapter 227.310 states Che following with regards tio zaning ix� annexed areas. "Zoning and Land use regulskions applicable to area outside citv continue to applv to area w�hen 3ncluded within ci`ty until altered or discontinued by citv. Zoning or land use ordinances or zoning regulations applicable to any area not within a city sha11 not cease to apply to the area merely because such area is later included within a city, but sh�11 continue to apply until, altered or discontinued by the Legislat�.ve body of the city in a manner provided by Lata." 2. Tigard Municip�l, Code, Section 18.12.02U Annexations statesithe £ollowinga ' "'Zoning regulations applicable to an azea prior to annexation to the city shall continue to apply and shall be enfarced by the c3.ty until a �one change for the area has been adapted by �he city council,.." (` _ � `�- 3. With one exception, the sub,ject "Rollzn�g Hi.11s" area �s zoned RiJ-4 Urbar► Residential District. A scnall triangu�.ar percel on the eastern side af the sub,ject area, ad,jacent 5tate i�.�ghway 217, is zhned MA.-I, Limited Manufacturing Produckion Di�trict and is occupied by two offiee struetures. � � � �� - - - — – __ ..�-..�..��.«: y o 1 I p8�� 2 Sta£f Report ZC 4-�74 (City of Tigard) Zoning south and west of the subjeet area i.s generally industrial; zoning to the narth ot tl�e sub,ject area is multi-family and industrial; and zoning �„ t�o the east across Highway 217 is generally commercial-pra�essional. i p 4. The existing land use pattern within the subject area is desczibed c; as followss � West of SW 72nd Avenue. ' Sin�le Family Etesidential uses iraterspersed with undeveloped, p�roperta:es. t,. East of SW 72nd Avenue. !! Largely vacant with two single family dwellin�s and two office structures. (� r:. ii The existing lands use pattern adjacent the subject area is as follows: u ,� Westerly. � Undeveloped psoper.ty with industrial uses farther west. F u t; Sautherly. Undeveloped praperty with industrial use farther south. Eastexly. �% State Highway 21..7; Sandburg Street 4££ice-Zndustria'1 area; `' Lineoln Propexties and Farmer�s Insurance office complexes; ;; un�i�veloped acrea�e. ;'; j: Nortt�erly. >'' � Multi-family dwelling; undeveloped groperty and same warehousing and �? industriaL uses. �� . 5. The '�igard Community Plan designates the westerr. side o£ S.W. 72nd Avenue, within the subject area, as Urban Low Residential stating "the predominate use i2� these areas wi1J. be single family housing.`;` r �"� � f`� The Plan desi.gz►�tes the eastern side of S.W. 72nd Avenue, within the subject ; area, as General Industrial stating the following objecti��ves: i' r : To provide l,ocations £or a wide range o£ industrial uses that are `? Y` campatible with one another. '` i. � . To protect land designated far industry from encroachment by us�s which are not compatible. i t �: . '�'o encouxage tk�e location of industry that will provi�de employment and � that will broaden the tax base of the cammunity. ;� �I 6. The City currently has an application for a zqne change to C-P, Commercial.- ��'I Professional on property located adjacent the �asterly side of S.W. 72nd Avenue. The proposed zone change includes approximately 10 acres of undeveloped land. �,I t E: 7. Office Uses are permitted wi.thin the County MA-1 distri,ct and the City �' M-4, Industrial Park zone. � �: � 8, Generally, professional. a£fice uses axe more compatible with single fam�.ly � xesidenkial neighborhoods, than 3ndustrial uses. � ' � : _ � _ _ . . ,r: . . �� . _ . _ � . .. . . . � . � � � � � � YJ;; Page 3 Staff Report ZC 4-74 (City of Tigard) � � � � �; �il Staff Recommendation ' �; � Approval of the City's request to cY�an$e existing County zoni.ng " classifications to cumpai�ab.Le City zones and to XefLect existing uses more compatible with an existing single fnmily residential neighborhood. The `� recammended changes of zone classification are as follows: , ALL County RU-4, Urba�n Residential Distri.ct to a City R-7, Single Family `w ttesidential zone. ,,�i The e�isting MA-1 Limited Manu£acturing- Product3on Distrzct, i!"' � containing two o££a.ce structures, to C-P, Commercial. Profe�sional l�� zones. �;. �: }a! �;,� l ;;'; ��i j:, E'; s, ;; ,.. ;;. �; Y. �;'' t� . � �i� ' �s �(, N,. �" {' L �. d {`; � �`�� . . .. . . � . � ... . . . .. . . . . _ . .. . �. .. ,;. .._. ....,. . .: .........,.. �" :� .. . .. � - _ � .- . . . � .. - � � . . � � �. -. . ;�: � . ... �. .... , ,. ,_ .. _ .. ... .. _ _;_ : ..�,.. : _,. . _ . , „. . . .:. �.:�,. ti�, ;. , , �, \ � l� I� �� , �f . . . r."� I \ v111�� r ~ � �p � 1 0.� � � tV �J � lJ � � � 1\`\� ; �,u: :,.,v:� �.vv � � 4�n � � �� v � ? �.-•�/ / l '(__ .5.� c.c> �c•: :�,, - - __._ =,� � � — � a � -s,. \ � .,� :�. - �;� - :=,,_ � t� V�� •�:t/ T �,� ?� � �` . � ..�. a : t ,, .. �. . - � . °�.. . , . . � .. . � �� .. . � .. . � .. , r t,1,� , ` �,` 1. � I �, ' C , �.� � h „ � ,t��Gn.x. ,�I�' � . �. �1 � . '1 �, . • '��1� � ��,,1 ` �, y� r� �` � -, �..;.� , r , ' ; : �N " � ; `� .._ ! .- `�--� �. ....,,,, --�pp�'� � _.� 1 � - � �. S.W. ,.�•'.'•.Vf1.��/J ,�r�'!:�'7' . ,5.. �t., � . O ,�- � ' L �y `�� .=--''�'"" � • � ----�- - �' - ( I � �, �� :... L � �� 'v��t. -� �r'. � � � ` � — -� --- • '.� ' "� �� I , 5 ��- --�— t� -� ,~�AR`�A -TO BE ANNBXED ,�. .�.w. ..� . . :,. �, -��,,. �. - . ' Ma•� ----;, . , . , . ' ", .: , a ' ' � �, , r� ,�: � � Y '' �� .."..�- • . ,r�. -__.. � _� � �r�e' �r . . C ; ,- � . � � ,s.w. s,n _ ' �" .; .. � - --- —� ., ',.; � . � — h .sr •�,'r' . . � . ,--r �----�1 �/ :� ' / / ' � � . ___._.-:�� . .. . ' _.._ __._ _ ��,.� . ��.. I I ,,.i , "`%�. °''V'i ; •� ��LGr.• /��s�� ` , � . .,.., _ .,, .. . _.,, �4 ^ ' { r� , � �,. . TIGARD PLANNING COMf�ISSION Staff Report � �1arch 5, 1974 Addendum to February 15, 1974 Staff Repart Agenda Item 4. 2 ZC 4-74 (City of Tigard) Zone Change • For properties within the area commonly known as the "Rolling Hills" area, generally located along both sides of S.W. 72nd Avenu� between Sl� Hunziker Street and SW Sandburg 5treet and compri.sing 62 acres. ' Applicant - City of Tigard Applicant' s Request . � Approval of a change in zoning classification from the existing County zoning to comparable City zones. Those requested changes are summarized as follows; Existincl County Zoning • Pr�posed City Zoni.ng ��', From: RU-4 (old R-?) , Urban Residenta.al To: R-7, Single Family District Residential f�A-1 (old I�-2-3-4) , Limited �lanu- C-P, Commercial facturing Praduc�ion District p�ofessional Applicant' s Proposal To facilitate administration of Tigard' s planninc� ' effort and to carry out the intent of the Tigard Community Plan by bringing County zoning into confarm-- ity with the City' s zoning ordinance. 5taff Findings 1. 5ee staff report of February 15, 1974 for adrJitional � findings. ; 2. The staff finds the City�s proposal to change the � existing County �IA-1 (old P1-2-3-�4) Limited �lanu- . � ' facturing Production District to a City C-P, ; Commercial-Professional zone is n�ot in canformance ' 1 with the Tigard Community Plan, said Plan des- . ignating the area "General Industrial". Nor, is the proposed zoning change consi.stent with the City�s' � �■�.._ _ . ,.,. .:. _ ;; ,�, . ,a� ' �`�� request to appsove a change of zoning classifica- tion to comparable City zones. The County MA-1 and City C-P zones are only marginally comparable. Conseq;uent-ly, the staff Wishes to revise its tenta-•� ; tive recommendation to reflect these findings. Staff Recommendation � Approval of th8 City'' s request tb change existing County zoning classifications to comparable City zones. The recommended changes of zone classification are as folloWS: - . A11 County RU-4, Urban Residential District to a City R-?, Single Family Residential zone. . Tfie existing I�N-1 Limited h1anufacturing - Pro- duction District•, containing two office structures, to an �1-4, Industrial. Park zone. � . � . . -2- :.. _ .. _ . _ �, � i;: �_ �, � !,:`r, ,�1 k..'' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION �' Staf£ Report � '� �:� �`' February 19, 1974 �';� Agenda Item 5.1 �<;�, TU Z-74 (Tual.at�.n Development Company, Inc. ) 4�;1 t:;j '�emporarv Use y. i`I �;� For property located east of S.W. 109"th, approximately 75 feet south of SW Naeve Streek, wi�.hin the "Summerfield" development. Tax Mxp 2S1 '�I IODn, Tax Lot 1400. Applicant . Tualatin Development Company, Inc. ;,II A�piicant's Request ;;,! To allow a truss manufacturing and equipment s,torage facilit� and a constructi.on ;II' office to be located on the subjeck prope�ty for the duration of the "Summerfield" project construction pexiod„ .,,i Applicant's Proposal ,;i ��'I To allow truss manufacturing and eqnipmen� storage facility and a 4,�i construction office to be located on the subject property so as to pr.ovide �,` office space for apptoximately 8 employees curxently provided office ''I � space in a "model home" an,d to mini.mize the transporxing oE material and �� heavy equipment over existing roads. S�aff Findings 1. 5ee attached ma�> £or existing land use and zoning. 2. The Planning Commissiun accozding to S�ction 18.80.020 (TMC) �'` I may issue temporary use permits for a longer period than 6 months, £ollowing T, procedure for conditional uses as set forth in Chapter 18.84 (TMC). � �; 3. The Planning Commission, in order to issue a �emporary use permit make a %; finding that one or more o£ five conditions, descxibed by S�ction 18.80.0;30 � (TMC) exist. '��' r� 4. The staf£ finds the applicant�s request conforms to Section 18.80.030 (5} ; (TMC) which states "that the purpose fo7r which the temporary use or occupancy � is sought is compatible with and i.ncident to the complation of the basic Z purpose for whic� the land is being developed, and the duration of such use t; is limited by the period af devel�o�ment, such as, temporary sales aff3ce in j; a residential. district." i� 5. A temporary use pexmit on the subject site was approved by the Washington County Baard of Adjustment on July 11, 1972. Said temporary use was to allaw temporary equipment storage for a period of one year. The related Washington �; County staff report and Board uf adjustment minutes are attached. r � � V q . _ r � . . _ . _ _ r Page 2 Staff Report TU 1-74 (TDC) 6. T�e applicant stated �he propased use would be provided with a11. � necessary utility service. �... 7. The ap�licant has submitted a site plan, indicating the proposed location nf khe mobile office and adjacent parking. The proposed office locatian and amoun� of parking are appropriate for the subject use and site. f3. Because o£ the inten�sity and n�ture of the sub,ject use �.n a Planned Development District of substantially residential character, the ��.emporary use should be reviewed at regular intervals to fnsure compa�tabilit.r of the subject use wixh the existing neighborhood. Staff Recommendation I Apprnval of a temporaxy use permit for a period of ane year for the I requested uses on the subject site. The �ermit to be reviewed at the end af one year related to said use��s sffect on the adjacent neighborhood. �� i C , � . _ _ ...a . .. _ _ ... ;.._ _ .. . i . , � . . . ' . �: : . �. . .T orar � � �Use. �:�.rj :.+ � �� _ ennp _ y . �� , . . . � ' . _ i r ` 1F $,,± ' . . � ' '• • . . . .l4• ,. .. .t. .1�.�+t�� t,.`` y i. ' �' . ,. . �� .i } . t !34 � a�� r: . . . � . � � . .._.._...---__._ _._.._ �...w..,..........w..�_:., ..,_.�.. ..—.......d.—..::�.r.. . ` �.,�. � �' ' { ' � , ' .• � . . � � . ' .. . �Y• � e. . " . •\ ' � � u • ` � . � `� ' 1 . ' - . �� . .. . . i . . �. . ,. _ - .. ` . . . . . . . � .�� . , - .. . � � � . r 1 i . � _. . . ' , � � - � . . i ,� � � . 3 W O VIE DR) � s�Q . ' SF� ' . 1 �4f t�E V�1G�t}� _ . S W KA LE ST E E , S�n � SFO : SF I� • . ' � STRFFr � � • ' ... � . _ . ? S JeCt � . ; �� sFQ . . t�u��y . �. . :�� i t e� � � — � .. , � � V�cAMT' � . _ ._. . . VI4��4A1T . vAca I�tT' . � . ' . � • . . . RDAp 2 � �� . � • ' . . • , F . �� • . . . • , . . E . • , � K i � . Dur.ham Road � .. -� � d, � � � � � 1 . . � . - . .. ... •'. .x .. � ... � .... �. � .. .. , . . ��.: .. � .,.,,. �.. . , .., � . ,. �. — 1 —_ �,; ( . . i � , WASH I tJGTON COUNTY CtOARD OF ADJ US7MENT I ��` S�haff RepoTt� � �! July II , l972 � I i E�ard of Adjusi-mcnt 72-219-V for prop�rty described as tax lot 1400 (porti�n) # on tax map ?SI IOD. Applicant: Tualai-in Dtv�loprnent Co. , I !1^�'LIC/1�JTPS REQtJCST: I' 1 • 1'fio appiicant reques-hs a variance pi-ovided under Section 2102-i (2)a nf the , Washington County Zcning Ordinance to provide for ten��porary sfiorage of equip- ; ment to be used in the development of a Planned Resideni�iai Dfstrict �n a � parcel con�taining approximately 1 .8 acres. LOCAT I ON Aid� LAh;D USE OF SUgJ ECT PROPERTY: The subJect sit� is located on the east sid� of S.4V. (09th Avenue a�proximat�l,y ' I 00 feet sou-�-h ot S.4�1. P!�eve ar�d ::��pports a f i I bert orcl7ard i n the R-7 Zan i ng ' District. SUR�tOUi`;�1 P�a �ON I NG ANC LAi�D USE: The subject site Ubuts R-7 Zoning supporting op��n prop�rty across 109�fih to west, a nurse�y to tne ^orth and open fleld and filberts to the east and south. � FlPPI.ICANT'S JUS1'IFICATION: The appl icani� states thai�: "The developm�nt of the King City I ! project ariil requlre the storage of lumber and equipment and the construction Qf a shop 1-o serve the area. By moving i�hese facilities or the �ite it :vil ! minimize the 1•ransporting of mat�ria) and heavy equipment over fih� er,isting roads.�' CONr=OR�•�khCE TO THE PLAN OF DEVELOFi�ENT: --------.___ The adopted Plan of Davolopment for fihe area d�signates the subject site for Rasidential Development. ; !'UBLiC UTILITIES REPGRT: • ' � The Tigard Water District and the Unified Se,verage AgQncy have not suhmitted . orritten veriticatian of the availabliity of public set,►�r and vrator sorvices � for the subject site. • STAFF F I ND I�;GS AND RECC"i��1EN0AT I ONS: j , ' i i . The staff finds •that the temporary storage of equtpmant during the building j of roads or othor d�velopmc�nts is permi,tl-ed f�r a pc�riod not to exceed one year, if approved by the P.c�ard of Adjustmeni- �nd It such relief can be ,' � granted withou�h sub,tantial detrimQnt 1-o the public good. 2. The staffi finds further that the applicant"has applled for a Pianned �' RQSidential Development which contafns a�proximately 201 acres and which ir�cludos the subject slte. I, _ . _ , . .� . , , � _ .. � - _ _ _ -- -- � ...,.,,..� ., ._;>.... . . ..�.. „<.� ..�,�...:�. ..._...: _�._ ::,.. ,,, . ..,... . .». , . . . ,. _ ._ ;;,.. ..,u_.._ ..._. ._, ._.._ ,, a._ f l .;, �.• ,� '' I�ige 2 � 72-2(9-V Therofiare,, in ord�r to r�duce traff(c and building hazards Th Th6 area of such � lar�a projcc-t, the sfiaft rt�co;�muncis approval of tho �em{��rary stot-�ge for a perioci of �ne year. if ths stor�ge is needod for more th�n the one year period, 1°ho a�Plica:nt shouid reapply for an additional year. • l �-' ' � . � � . � � . � 4 �. , _ 1� 1 :.e. �_�°..�, _ _ ,' c' " ,..� ..., _ . .� _.,... .,,. , ,:. ._ _ . ,. , � y . , � �l . . .' }�� C . _ �". � E�A ��I(NUTES * 7/II/72 - 3 . �:; . appraval , an amQndment hes be�n added to the, Ordinanca which permits thls use � in i�he F-2 Zono as a Conditiona) Use on a parcoi of �tat less than tw� acres. Tho staff feeis that because tha roquest may sr�orl be providod for in the Or- dinance, action on the variance should be d�tor�e8 ir order to ailow the j applicant i�he opportunity to chang� hls requaGt to an applicatlon for a Condl-hional Use which would then br•ing his use (nto complianco wlth the � Ordinance. FurthQr, thQ staff feels that the fee for this variance should i be applied to the Conditlonai Use appllcation. i� � ti1r. tiValker appeared �in support of tho appl icai-ion and stated t�hat he agrees ; .- w(th the staff recommendation and will apply for a conditional use tivhen ?'� the Ordinance is amended. � �II Th�re were no objectors and �fhe public hgaring vras closed. �� il I��Ir. Curtis m�oved that the application bo tabled until the Zoning Ordin- i ance amendment ailowing this request as a CondiTional Use in the F-1 and i F-2 District is finai�ed by the Board of Commissioners. Mr. Kinney seconded ! a�d the motion carried. �� i ��I ��`��72-2 I 9-V 7ua I at i n Reve I opr�ent Corp. - Tempora ry Equ i pmeni� Stora�e sl ��1r. t�lcDanie! explained the request for a varfance to provide far temporary � � storage of equipment to bo used in the development of a Planned Residential Disfiricfi on a parcel locatod on the east side of SPJ 109th Avenue, approx- imately 100 feQt sduth of SW Naive. He 1-hen expla�ined the s•fafif findings that the tempor•ary storage of equiprnent during the building af roads or other dovelopments is permitted for a period not to exceed one year, if approved by the F3oard of AdJust�ment. The statf finds further that the ap- f; plicant has app�lled for a Planned Residential 0•�velopment v�hich contains � approximately ?_01 acres and includes the subject site. Therefare, in order Y to reduce �raffilc and building hazards ln -hhe aroa of such a large �roJect, r; the staff recommends approval of the tEmporary storage for a pariod of one (:, year. tf tho s-horage is needod for more than tt�e ono year period, fihe aP- � plicant should reapply for an additional year. ' � Mr. Roy Brotivn appeared in support of the application. There were no objectors and the pubiic hearing was closod. �' Mr. Curtis moved that thQ appilcafiion be approved sub,ject to the staff k canditions an�d findings. Mr. Kinney secondod and the motion carried. � �r.__ . __ TIGARD PLANNING COT�fISSION Staff Report � � February 19, 1974 Agenda Item 6.1 V 7-73 (Circle A-W) '' Variance For �roperty located at 13885 S.W. 72nd Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 1DC, � Tax Lot 1100). i � �Appl icant �� t — Circle A-W Product� Gompany � :� Applicant's Re uq_est . � To construct an addition to an existing building, said addition proposed � to have a 12 foot side yard setback where a 20 foot setback is required i in an M-2, General Industrial zone. gt �� ;i .r Staff Findings �� ;, 1. Applicant's justification is stated as follows: "It is impossible to �F efficiently utilize the existing building and the proposed new building �s if we are required to provide 20 feet rear yard setback. However, we ',k ` �;' can meet all accepted fire protection measures and provide a safe building." 2. The applicant praposes a 48 foot easement on an adjacent tax lot, said easement restricting the further construction of structures upon the easement and providing a potential 60 foat separation between buildings. The applicank has furnished no easement documents for review by the planning staff and City Attorney. '� � 3. The applicant has not submitted a description of the problems inherent �' in the manufacturing process that causes loss of efficiency inside the � building and proves an undue hardship. e. �i j� 4. Section 18.76.010 (Tigard Municipal Code) states ". . . the planning �� commission may authorize variances from the requirements of this title where it � can be shown that, owi.ng to special and unusual circumstances related to specific ' ,, piece of property, the literal interpretation of this title would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship. ,.In granting a variance .the planning commission may attach conditions which it finds necessary to protect the best interests o£ the svrrounding property or neighborhood and to otherwise achieve the �� purposes of this title". f �p '•.� In addition Section 18.76.020 (Tigard Municipal Gode) states that "no variance �•� shall be granted by the planning commission unless it can be shown that all the ' following conditions exist: a + � (1) Exceptional or extraordinary conditions applying to the property that do nat apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, �� which conditions are a result of lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control; � � , , . . ., Page 2 Staff Report V 7-73 (Circle A-W) (2) The variance is necessary for the pxeservation of a property x'ight � � of the applicant substantially the same as is possessed by owners of other property in the same zone or vicinity; The authorization of the variance shall not be materially detrimental ��) e zone o'r to the �urposes of this title, be injurious to property in th i vicinity in v.�hich the property is located, or be otherwise detrimental to' the objectives of any city development plan or policy; � I (4) The rariance requested is the minimum variance from the provisions and ! standards of this title which wi11 alleviate the hardship, � i - S. The staff does not have sufficient material to analyze the applicant's ,I request and make a considered recommendation. _ _ i , I Staff Recommendation Continue item to next hearing, enabling the applicant to submit necessary , � documentation for review and analysis by the staff. i , i � i ' � { I � �` ,