Planning Commission Packet - 08/07/1973 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
�
� �
�., �
�i����!!
' °���?l� ���r �'���a�l�N
i; ,$��,9�F�° �G�'t�e�� � �l�l�ft?1�31� °(�g �,�`��
��'�� e1��"a ��! ��°ffi��)�, � �,�C�`�a�n�� �°�C�]m�
�.�� �o�d'a �`'���n �4r��a��� �°����.9 U�c����
�i"�63��J' e���6�.��11 �EIl�, �1�1d����,ffi� �L�1��fflC��� m °�8� �o�o
�l9d�JL_14� ���'�.� °* bl):� �b�o
. . . �• &YlA4Wlq L��Y/ �LJ15U_wl�.J3 . .
' . Ca O AD�.LL3��1 �!'$b2�� � ..
. . �1• !£-.'��"�C�J V`'�9 11A�S' �{��'�'d6lCUJJ � .
�'�" . �s�, ��'tl��.1X� �G�`l��ffi� ��' J��f �s �'�`�.3
�,.� ���.� ��`��� ��' �� ��� ���(�
�o ��5�� �`'���r � "�,��sG (��1��
�+.�1 ��a�e ��c� l� �_°�� Q��a��� �I���c�c��
Qc��1`��.ffi�]�ce� ��� �t��J' �j�'(� u���,��
' A ��,�1�$� ��j �°• �. �no F���,(d�� (�'t��a�?��J '� � (� �� �8���°�,�'���m
�"�a� �p°�8 �`��� ��i�� ����.�'�a���, �s� (�m�s �m�c�r� (�¢���c��a ��
.�_�� �P���. ���,��m�a��a ���d� �� �'�t� c��a���������ffi �� �
����,��'�.c� ��°� c����,��e °.�°� sa�To�jc�c�� ;����� �� l���sn��. ��
i�.�l��� �°� 4�1� `� .�S'm� ��l"1�1t� �bUC�'�I���'3'lb $�1.�. �s`�i9 ���,9��`ly�lb�d�,�e .. .
'� ����� ����,�an ��' '�� ��ac���/ �,s 'rt�a�rr�d. �,� �� �l���d�s��
c��'a�l,G�6 8b� '�� ��?���Ql °�aPC��l��e�'�����Il ��'�� c���c��2�EA�O.
°.i� ���ae»�. ��x°���$ �°�'�'�6 ���� �°JI��K 1� �� �.�'ty °�� 1.��� 7L�y
�a �� �9 �a ��9 °��� �stt� ���
S� �°i�r�,�s
�s��;�m� � (���� ��ma�.���.��a
�°��" �d�c��et����L��n
���s��c��a ��,��r����»�a� � �����r� �
�' '
,: . , : . . ,._ . .._ _ _ _.. ..
, , .. ,: _ _.. . ....:� _ , _ ., ,r
4;
�
�� � � � � � �
. i ,
4 .
�"_ i:
�o ���,2� �'�'����r � '�LRI��`L`��,1���, ��(� �;
5
•� �ffi1��,�,�,�a�71, ���c� (�'� �,�j�°�� ��'����1,�4�1�� �
����������. ���� ���� �� ��7��� �,
;
� ��p��s���,u� ��r ���s i�c���� �ro��� �'�� c�����,c��,��,c��m c��' c��ng��.�� �
d��l�� �,�s �� ,� ���.����a!�1 �n�c� �ffi � �a��➢ ��a�� ���,�,� ;..
������a��� ���c�. �� ����� �� �,�c��c�� ��6� �� ���� ��a��•�
� � �'��� ���� �,� ���➢ �a�����m�� �� ���� �e��d�,��,��4 � ;
�a����. ��e������ �.� ���c��a ���� ��a ��. �9 �� ��s �,�9 �n� ,;
�� ��
�[���°�� ���' �cc�c��m�ffi�a��3��� k i
;�
;
6. ��� ��r1�c� ��8��
7. s���r���c�� � �����o�,��� ��� ����� '
�
;
`�oA �arg,�,��,� �c�u���v���i �u�€��,c�s�� C
� ������aeace� ����� �1��� �,�°c� 1�u���
�c�'��sU�sB �L�$ �G��s �,��C�'l�C� cSD14� 'l�� ��d�`ft��t�3'� ��R�C�F���C�`��C�L�1
�,��C�r�c�.1�°�71'{� �5S' a�7i o�n �'l�n�°� �.31C�J.01. n�e�o c�t°����� �'CC;��f ��$'C9�C�.
�1t�T�''�°�,il� c�i''�th1�� �$�'�ct?)�n1.k�tRb`�i�1Y�5�
�.� �� ���� Q�°��� ������ �om�
��������� ���� �� � �����
������e ��� �� ���� ����� �� � ���� ���� �� ���y
, ������� �� ����r ����������
a���� ���� �����������
�. s��a��a�r�s � ��� � ���������
�o� a��� � ���
,,
����L��l°e 57[�N/� ►�e�e ��°�i��' ���g c��.,clJ�(�"C�,1�`�'s
�a����� ��n �s����,� ��ac°���,�� ��'
]P��iau R+��� ���c.
�- ��� �����������
�an�����.�� Ib�s��a����a� �1 �c���.c��a
; P�e 2 • &� ��dl� - ���� 7'a �9��
` I
l �
_,..._-,.., ..� ., .� .. �.:: �..W..�,.... .. �.�.. _ ,,.._�. ._.a:�,. .��.� ,�..�.,�, : _
��_.. .ww _ _ . .. ..._ ..,..� . �._,.,.. .... . .. ,...,�.. __�,_ w,. . +
�"'�' �,
. �*�,.: �
�
9. ��� ����� � �3��'
9.� �a��.�� �������
�����.��: ����i �� W�i�� �� �� ���� ��
��c���,c� ��,���
� 9.� ��� ��� �����g '
�(4°�`��:�i#b°o �°E'"GNJ a�e�e �Y4_1�.'�'s�b �Qt�4�
g.� ���.a�'��.� ��. a�nd. R�I�a��
��`����o ��� �ak�d �� ���.
�.� �'��°� �8c���ea..'��
� ����S��i ���a����� ��� �� k��;���'�� ���'��9
�� �'�c�� ��au'�� �� ���. ��a �����
�� �� � �������� ��� ����
����
��
�.� ��,�°c�,� Am6�1 k���fl��`��
�A1d�RCt.l���t58p dL�� d3�EE O ��aE� �V l`N�WIti �
4
9 e'� ��'�� �l.°�dL,�lu.u.4/1'� a��,°�� '�'l�'i . .
��'����t ��.��'��.,� �� ��.�'��,1CA� ��,�� �.�. ��k�
�i.i��y ��c�@�6 �i� � �$��'�y �i� ��1��d ��'
��8 �'$+���.
�• �e��°i�°Y
� ,
P�6e 3 � �� 11�e� - l���sit 7, �9°�'�
_ _ . �
.
, �� � �
_: _ .. , . ,, , . . , .
... _ _ ., <...:. . , �e;
. ��
� , ,;.. ��
�.._: �...
� �� �'
�— -�1 G��f1'f�' � �V
TIGAF�D PLANNING COmf�ISSIQN �;
Regula� r'lee��i.ng � August `l, 19'13 ;'
�<
Twali�y J�tl High Srhool.� lect��rg �oom �'e
'i4650 S.Wa 97th Nvenue, Ti,c��;rd, Oregon i
r:
�
�
1 . CALL T� ORdER �'
Ao The mee�it7y �ds c�11.gd t;a nrder a� 7:4� P.�I. '
�
i;:l
�m ROLL CAL.L. �
,.
A o P�essnt� Cor�m:iss.�.nnors Ba]„L, Bs�rkhurst, Ha�tman, ,`
Le���s, Nic�1.i and Chairmar� LJhi��aker, �t
pl.annir�g Ua.�ecfior, 1,1:i.nk 8rar�ks; Assooid�e !;I
Planner, Di.rk Bol�n; Der�yck Da.ttman uf €:�I
the Cit;y � s ���torney°s offiae. ��I
3o A�PROVAL OF' f�INUl'ES ��'I'
'.�I
Ao Th� min��tes �f the ai.�ly �i, 1973 Pls�nn.ing Commis�ioi� �?'�,
,� mee�ing were �.mended as fc�llows a �;i
i
1 m Paga 5 co,icarning tl�e Aa�row Heating conditianal ��
��se y Ball clid n�t �eoommer�d appraval of the
r�q�es�t b�.�� rathe� statac� he felt tha �ayuest
was an ap�aro�riat�s one but under the iriterpre�a�.ion
c�F �h� c�rdana�ce a� sts�teci by �he City Attorney �;
he ca�1„d not reca�mbnd approvale E,,
;.
2o Pago 7 oor�ce�ning the Sahul.z conditir�nal use �
�he 3rd condi��.on shr�uld st��e tlia� no accoss ���
�ill. be prGVided onto Ti�deman to inc].ude �ha �;;
construction of drivewaygo �
�'i
H. Th� mi.nutes were a�pr��!ec� as amerided by unanfmous <<
vote �f �he Commfsca.on presenta 1`�
;i
4. DISCUSSTON PERTOD k'
�;
A. C;eorge �lar����1.1 c�f' �h� T�aala�i,M Dev�7,oPment Corp_
nx��tir�n requested the planhing Comm.issioh cons�ider�
� ' probl.ems created for �heir development resul�t,ing
fro�n � recent City A��arne� a.nterpretation of �ha �
stree�s standarc�s sectic+n af' the Subdivision qrdi.nanae.
He �+�a�ed that he wag ��qua��ing �he planna,ng Comm�.�sa.an �
aroept an interpse�ation �f the Subd�.vision Ordinan�e �
� contsary to �hat affered by '�he C�.�y Attorn�y °a offioe.
;
�
;
,; �
- _ _._.__.. _ � _. . .� _.. ,. . «�.,..., , . , r._
_ . �
�. . � _
r �.., � .
�_.,
f�rs f�a�shal.l. p��sen�ec� a his�ory �f �he Summerfi.e.ld
development �o date� beginning with its original
approval by Washingtr�n Gounty as a Flanned Residential
Developmento 7he p�oject was then annexed to the
City of `i°.�gard �nd tP�� Ca.ty initiated a change of
zoning to the City °s P1.anned Deve,lopment Di,str. �ct.
�Ir. I�ar�ha:11 po�.nted n�t that accord.�ng to his
interpx�etati.on of tho Subdiviss.on Ord.inance, the
or�iinance stat�s that la�cge scale developments can '
bP grantPd except�.ons f�or� the subd.�v�.sion code and
th�t the Ci�y �s �pF�ro��al. c�f the P-D zone was also an
acceptance oP the stre��� on the sukamitt�d plan not
" confo:�m.�.ng to the C�.ty° s m.�nimum street standa�ds in
the Subd�vi�ion O�din�ncem He concl.uderl by requesting
the P�.�nning Cor�mission to inte,cpret �he Subdivi��.on
Ord�.nance as gr�nt.i,r�g exception fo� large scale devel-
opr�ents ove� �nd �ga.�n�t �he recommPndation ofi th�
City Atto�n�y who sta�ed that a var�.ance m��st be sought
for such deviations f'com the required standards.
B. Derryck Dittman spoke fo� the City ' s Attornc�yes office
sta�ing that the parag��.ph �.n the subdiv�.sion code
ref��r�_ng to exception is intended to include .large
sca.le deve�.op�nents �� P1ig,i.ble �`or a varianc� acco�d-
� ing t� the standards anr� proredures �rrovided in the
va�iance sec��.�on of �he subdi��ision o�dinanoe,
Ce At 8000 �he d.i.scussion w�s te�minated a�n order to
b�gi.n •Lhe publ.ic hear.�.ng �cheduled for f,his ta.mee
Da Geor.ge (�ar.shall was a�ivised that;, �.f he �iesired, he
could cont.inu� discus�a.on on this matter w.i�h the
pl�nning C�mmission af�sr the Public Hearings were
�UP..L�s
E. Aftex� alosing •the public hear�.ng at 9:C1Q, thP discussion
was resumed conside�ing the Summerf.ield matter. Bi11
�Ic�lonagle, of Harris and f�cl�onagle Engineer�, spoke for
Summerfield statinr� that he did not agree with the
City Attorney ' s �.nterpret�tion of thi.s sect�.on of the
Siabdi,vision O�di�n�nce and urged the Planning Commission
to continue to in�erpret the ordinance as they had in
the past.
F. George Lewis s��ted tha� according to his reading of
the subdivisi�n ordin�.nce i.t did grant excepta.ons to
large scale develnpments and he interpx�ets Summerfield
as being what the ordin�nce descri.bes as a large sc�le
developmen'tm He ther�fore felt that, in this case, the
City A�torney a s opa.n,fc�n was inappropriate.
� Go (�r. D.ittman �nce �g�ih explained the Czty A�tosney � s
op�.ninn and concluded by stating tha� a l�rge soale
development, as any other develapment, mu�t be graMt.e�l
� . • „
��•.• Page 2 - PC Ag�hda �- August 7, 1973
.,
�..�., _ _
• �...� � .:
,.,.
�I.�
a var7.ance �.n orda�c �o c�PV�.at� f�om the standards
of the sub�livision orc�:�r�ance.
H. Ball stated that he had tr�_ed to rea�J the subdivzsi.on
ordinance in nrder to co e ou�t it t .
�e w h he �.ntPr r�t
p at�.on
as Summerfield hdd sugges�ed a.nd found it not possi.bl.e
ta o �
d s e He the�ef"ore stateci that he agseed with the ,
City Attorney' � pr�s�.•�.i,c�n on tha.s matter anci that the
Summerfiel.d �o "ect shoulci be re uired tr� obtain a
J
r �
va�iance where �he standa�ds havP been devia�ed frorrs.
I o George L_�wis mr�v�ci �o cons�.dex t}�e p.reliminary plat
fc�� Summe�f�,e�d 11 at �he next Pleni��.ng Comma.ssa.on
hea�ing on A�igust 21 , �973m Tha motion wa� put to a
vc�te and passed ur�ar��,mot�s.ly a
5. PUBLIC HEA�iTNG � Zane Ch�.hge
4. 1 Zone Chang� ZC 4�73 (F�rmers Ir�su�ance)
(Continued fror� �e�l.y �3rd meeting)
A rec�uest� by F', �:o G o Hold�.ng Company to changc� � �one
cl.ass,ification f`rom R-7, Single Fami.ly Res.identi,al
and C-3, Gen�aral Cc�mmerc.ial, to P�D, P.lanned Development,
allows.ng the �u�ture c�n��ructior� of a motel-office park
� camp'lexm The subject property is bounded by Highway 217
and T-5 on the so�the�st a.nd west, x�espect,ively. The
western portion of the property is bordered by the Lamb-
Wesi:on complex and the proposed Travc�rs-Johnston office
� development� �'he p�cop�s�l comprises 27p76 acres (7ax
! �1ap 2S1 "ID, Tax �.ats 1CJ0, 200, 300, �t70, 500, 50'1 , 701
` and 1100)
�
�
� A. Staff F.i.ndings
1 . The staff preser�ted a list of n.ir�e f.�nd.ings relative
�o th?s zone change request!m In summary, these
findings f'ound the .r,Pquest in conformance with the
Comprehensive P1an and �he materials submitted to
the Pl.anning Commis�.ion werA c�nsa.dered complete
and judged �to const.itute a psel�.minary development
plan and prog��m as descr�ibed 18. 56. 020 of the Ti,garci
�lunicipal Code.,
8. 1"estimony and Cco�s Examination
1 . Proponents
A. S�eak�.ng fo� th� appl.�.cant w�s Bud D�i,ngdulph �f
B�oome, �elig ahd Ox�ingdulph Architects, He presented
a document to the Planning Commission, an addendum
� to the pr.evious ma�erial which had been submi�te.d
at �he prev:�ous publ.ic heas�:t�g� This add�ndum included
an a1�e.rnat�..ve tn �he motor hotel proposal �o be
included on the subject site� He sta�ed tha�t F�rmers
, , , .
Page 3 - PC Aqenda - Augus� l, 1973
_ .., .
�_ _. .._..,_ _�_.._.___� . __ .
,_.:.....,._�, ... . .,:. _, _ ,
..__. . .. . . _
. . _..,_.. . _... ..
�:
�
� �'� �, a
,;��. �� � � ���
� � would 1.ike to ha.ve �hs alterna�e approval for �';
a 100, 000 square fa�at office t�u.�1�1�.ng on the
motos-•�ho�tel s.��te �.f' the motor h��el, c�ue �o thP
time lage .�nvo�ved ,i.n �.ocating on th:is site,
chooses anothe� locatian. The addendum i.ncluderJ 4;
a market an�ly5is f�r the l�ca�a�on of th� motor- �y
hotel i.n this por�s.nn ef Portland I�etrc�po�.itan ��
a�eao "ft�iP fi�m of Ketnmo�s-�W.�1son Tnco;r.prar.a�ed ;�;
conductecl the market an�l.ys.�.s and as a .resul� of
tF�e�.r ��udy concluded t;h�t �ha.s �ras a des;i�able a
lncati.on, f�om an econom.�c standpo.int, for a ,:�
motor�hote.� facility. �iro O�,ingdul�h cont,inued #i
by saying that he understood th�f at this t�.me ���
•�he Pl.anr�.�nq Comrn,iss.�,rrb w�� con�ic�er,ing �the pro jec•t �;
f`o� prel,zmi.n�a:y cr�nce�t ��pp�o��al �nd that the next �.
�tep is �to �ubmi.t morE� de����.ied deve].opment s
info�mat;.ion. He concluded �y statzny that this a!
.�.nforma�.�.on w�.11 be su;�p'Lied and hopeful.ly approved ,'
by the plann.�.ng Cor�ma..s�;x.on and, �.f the sewer �:
si�uati.on does nnt preven� cnnstruc�ion of' the �
motor-hotel, �.� cr�ul.d beg�.n wit;hin 1973e `''
.��t ker uestioned tho alternate �an fc�:r an �
B. Wh a q p �
office site on the motc�r-�hotel s.�te. The addet�rJum
submi�ted states that f,has�e w:il1 t�P no changP in �
�' densi.t�y of site use, but daes add 3n addit�onal
12U pa�k.ing spacesG Chai�R�an Wh.i.tt�ker questinn�d
whether. o� nut, in fact, th.is woul.d i.mply a
change a.n den�i�y in sitP use a.nd also questianed
the additior�al. pa�king spaces and their impact„ ��,
�Ird Oi�..ngdu�.�h rQSponc{e�i that the parking requ�.re- f;
ments fo� a ^�ot���hote� a�e d.�.ffe�ent than those �
for an office buxld.�nge '1"herefoze �he o�fice '''
buil.c�ing tdill cover. less si�e area than the mato�-� �
hotelo
Ca Hartman a�ked if the motel wauld not create diff'erent �
t�affic peaks th�n the o�fice and therefore spread s
the traff.a.c aut ove� d�.fferent times. I�r. Oringdulph �
sa�.d yes, this wauld be the reswlt.
p. Ball st�ted that the problem with the p�oposal is i.
that is must he carried ou� in conformance w.�th the
zoning ordinance, t:he �roblem being that the ordinance
requires definite development plans to be submitted
bePore the zone can be changede Ball also stated
FIG company ,is cons�.dex�ing a phase development which
makos it .impract�,ica.� ta st,abmit de�tazl,ed plans for
the entire project at �th�.s timee He stated that befor�+
the zone can be changed the P1ann.�ng Commissinn must
�' have a def�.n�te and spec,ific proposal for the enti,re
devel.opment.
Page 4 - PC Agenda - A�agust 7, 1973
� . _. _
� t
` �
�-° He then que�tionerJ I��. Or�.ngdulph .if his intention
was to seek approv�l fo� each ir�dividual. parcel,
and the�eFore ind.i.vidual �one changes, o,r app,roval
for the ent,ire p��c�l at one time� �Ir. Ox�ingdulph
responded that yea �hey we�e seeking �pprov�l for
the eni�i�e parcel and the �.ntc�nt.�on was to subrnit
a maste� plan f°o:� developmen�:. c�f' the prc��ject
based upon the concept beir�g presented t� the
P1ann.�ng Commiss��onm Ivla�e Ba1.1 stated that th�.s i
waul.d be a�propriate if•th� infortna�a.c�n �iere �.n
sufficien�t d��a�.�. and �nswered the requ�.remen-�s
fnr -�he f�.n�l dev�la�ment pla.� as set down �.n
the zoning c�rd.i.nanceF
Eo Ii�ving Lazson a x�esi.dont of the area, askr�d hor,�
traffic would get to the motel sat� fr�m int�rstate
5. �1r. U�ingdulph ��,�d that �intil E�3th' �t�eet were
c�nstruc�,ed 66�th S�tre�t wo�sl.d be used as wetii a5
Hampton to 2'I7�
F� Beth B:�shap a res:i�len� of �;he x�ol.ling hi,1.l �ub�
division vo the east said that she livps on �
Uarr�s Street �nd t�ere are many people t;h��� �ei�
confused wf�:i,le da�.i.va,ng to the Far�ners Site and
pass ��hrough her ne:�ghbo�h�od� She tFiu�efore stated
', �;,_ tha� this �it;e �,s nat �s �.ccessible as Farmers �.s
s�ating it ism
Staff Recommendat�on
A� '(hP st�.ff r�c�r�n��ns�ed a�proval of the �a�•ela.minary
devel��ment plan and prc�gramm
�,
i�
Commission Discussion and Action r
l�
t A. Hartman expressed conce�n ov�r the traffic c�.rc-
ulat.ion problems in thc� area. Ne s�;at�d that the �
so7.ution to many of thc�se px�ablems is k�eyond the �
contro'1 of the applicant;, the solution ' s resting 'f'
with �he governm�ntal� jurisdzcations involved. �
€
He vieweci the prr�posal to be a favorable one and j
felt the traffic c.�rculation pr�blems in th� area f:
shoul.d n�t be ci,•Led as a �eason for denying the �;
re ues�. fi
q {,<
B. George Lewis stated th�t the Farmers Insu�ance �'
Group shoulcl be complementP�1 for the time and
effort ,involued i� �.il�nna.ng the proposed project �
and moved tha prel.s.m:ina:cy concept plan be approved '�
according tc� the st�ff r�comrnend�ti.ons and finda,ngs. �`
Hartman seconded the motions �
� ��
;
" Fage 5 ,.- PC Agenda - August l, 1973
■�, . _. ,
�, �_
�,r t
C o Bal,l a.y:ceed w.i�h L�wis s comments and s�tated that
�he P=D a.s a good method �f con�tro.L�ing this
project over a long �eriod of timee Nowever, he
poin•�ed otJt that his ���e for apProval of the
concep� does not .�ricl,ud� the moto'r-hotel sitP.
b. 1"he m�ti.on ��s p�at to a vate and passed us�an.imr�u�l.y.
5. Pl18LI'C HEARTNG - Cnnd.itic�nal. Use
5. 1 Cond�.ti:onal. Us� ClJ 13�-�73 (Arrow Neat�.ng Co. )
(Continued from �u.ly 3rd heariny) 1
- An app3i.ca�ion by Arro� Heat.ing Company fo� consid-
eration af duplex dwell.�.ng un�.ts as a conditi:c�n�l
use in an R-�"15, S�.ng1e Family R�asidentia7. zane� Th�.s
proPasal is located nor�h of` Wal.nut Street and 40D I
fec�t east of 12.1st, adjacent the Brookway Subdivi.sione ;
�°he proposal compr.�ses 2.. 5 acres. (`fax rlap 2S1 3BB, �
Tax Lots 100, 2.00 and 300) '
�
Ae Tnte�im S•�af� Recommenda�i.on� �
�
�` 1 . Wink B�ook� ,i.nf�xmPd the Commissioners that
� •the �pplicant has requested tabl.ing th.is .item to
the August 21 , '1973 h�aring. He therefo�e
reaomme�ded �h�t the request be tabled unti.l the
' August 2'I , 1973 heari.ng.
B, Comm�.ssion Discussion �nd Action
1 . Ba�khux•st move�i to table the request to the
August 21 , 1973 h7earingo Hartmart seconded the
motion and i� passed by a unani,mous vote.
6. CLOSED P`U8L7C HEARING
- The pub].ic hea�ing was c�.osed at 9e[70 Ps�le
Ze SUBDIUZSIONS - Prel..iminary P1at Approval,
7a1 Englewood (Gommonw�al�h Prnpez�ties�
(Continued from Ju1y 3rd, hearing)
Location: 100 acres located on the southeast intersection
quarJrant of SeW. 121st and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd.
A. Interim S�taff Reer�mm�ndations �
1e Brooks 5�a�ed that the applic�n� wishes to t�ble �he
�.�'
request ,unti.l the eonflicts between �ha Zaning �
Subd,ivisions O�dinances a�e resolved. The staff
�thezef`Q�e r�commended tab�.ing this item until these
�
Page 6 - PC Agenda - Augus� 7, 1973
�t..., ... . ;,>
� � ,. � � � ; �� ,���. ,:�, � �
—. , �a, ._ ... _,. . ::.a
, ,
�.- �..
�v ronf''l..�c�s were resolved or unta.l the applicant
wishes �o xesut�mit his psoposal mee�ing the
City ' s subd,�.v�.s�on st�ndardsN
B. Comm.��sion U.�.scu���.on �nd Ac�ion
"I . L.e�i.s moved to aY:1.ow subm.9.ttal af �he subdiv�.sion
prel,ima.nary �lat f°o� the Augus� 2'I , 'I 973 hea�.ing.
Ba�.1 seconded and �he motion passed by un�himous
votea
7.2 Lake Terrace (A:crow Heat�.ng Con )
(L'ontinued f�otn Ju�.y 3�d hearing)
Locationo Narth of Walnut Street and 400 feet east
cf 121s�, adjacent the Brookway Subdivisi�n.
A. I:n�e�im Staf'f Recomrrenda�ic�ns
1e Tr� accardance wi±h the conditional use for this
prnperty the s�taff recommended �abl�,ng to •the
Aug�st 21 , 1973 hearyng.
Bm Comm.��s.�on D�.scussiara and Ac�ion �i
' �; 1 . Har�man moved �nd Ba'll seconded to tabl.e the request
to the A��g�st �1 , 1973 he�r�.ng. The mot.ion passed
I�y unan.�mau� �at��o �I
8� SUBUIUTSIONS - �IINOR LAND PARI'T�ONING I
8. 1 Irvington-�(��ore
;
Lacatinn � 82.05 SaWe Hun�iker Raad, I
ad��cen� Hur�xiker on westerly
extremity of 7rv�.ngtan�-�loore site. i
. A. StaPf Recommendation I
1 . Staff recommended app�oval af the minor land
pa�titianing With the condition that 10 feet
of additional. r.ight�of-w�y be dedicated along
tha�. partion oP the applicarit' s property adjacent '
tn southwes� Hunziker 5�reet. This teh feet is to
include �the en�:ire pz�operty ownPd by the �pplicant
and not mer�:ly that pres�ntly being part.itioned. '
Said dedicata.an �hal1 be cotnpleted prior to
issuance of �tn oc�up�.ncy permit for the propqs�d
oPfice builcling on �the par�it�.oned site. �
8. Commission Da,scuss�.on and Action �I
� i
1 . Hartman mc�vet� t;o appr�ve the m:inor l,and �a�ti�tianing
with the staff conditions and wi.t;h the addit.�onal
, , ,
Page ? - PC Agenda - August 7, `1973
��.:
.._.._,, ._.. _.. ... . _ , . . .. ....�.,....._._. ., _. , ,_.
;,. , _ .., ... t ,..:,, ,:.,.�..�. ,_...,.
........,. .:
,�...,......_.. . . _ _
_,... , , . . ,. . . . . .,.:. :....
.. . _ _ . .:.., _-, . . ,1 ,.
Sk:
�
;i
. . . . . ,.� . . ��
. . . � � . . . . �
�:.. �,
��.. � . . . _ . . . �,
cond�.ta.on that the en�.ire �rnpe,cty �wned by the
applicar�� be brough� a.nto conformance w�.th the �
City� s si.te devel.opment p1�n r.eview �rdinancee
Barkhuz�st seconded and the tno�i.on passed by a ;;
unanitnous vo�e.
�"'
9. SITE DEUEL.OPP'IENT PLAN REIIrEW ``
i'.
I
9. 1 SU[I�.QW Apartments �',
1
Locatinnm No�;•th �f W�1nut and 450 e�s� �f �
Pacific Highway �'`��
A. S��ff Recommend3�t;ions i;
r.:
1 . `fhe staff recomm�nded ap��oua�. c�f �he si.te p,lan �'
�s suk�mi�te�. i
i:,
;�
B. Commission D.�.scussic,n and Action ±
� � � �,:
,,
1 o L.��is moved to app�c�ve �he subm�.�ted p�.an �nd E�'
Hartrnan secanded. �'he r�otion pa�sed by unan�.mous f�!
vof,em `
�,
9.2 Puget Die Cas��ing �!
Locationo 7440 SuW� Bnnita Road
A. Staff Reco€�r�pndat:�or� -
1 e 7'he staff r�co�triended d.��approva.l of the site and �,;.
landsca zng lan a.s subml.tted, T'hp staff �u ested �:;
P P 99
a . �„
that the a 1'icant resubm�.t new lans ro�atin
P
P P 9
�'
to the standards and olicies set o t i
p f r h n the F,
Tigard Community plan and the Sit� Develc�pment ('
pl�n revie4i sec�ion of the Zaning Ord�nance. �'
�'�
:,
Bo Commiss.ian Discussa.on and Acti,an t
,
1 . Hartman maued to disapprove the pl.an on the grounds
that it is not suffi.cient to meet the requirsments
of the Sa�e D�velopment Plan review ordinance. _
Barkhurst sPCOnded and motion passed four to one �
with Nicoli dissenting.
9. 3 Columbia Hardwood and (�aulding
Loca�ion� 12700 S.Wm Ha11. 81,vd.
A. Staff Findings
�`
Tfie staff finds �he �ppl.ican�' s proposal is similar
to the Puge� Die Ca��ing case, relating to paving for
Page 8 - PC Agenda - Augus� 7, 1973
..�w _ __ . _. . . _:.
, _ , ,,. . .: ., ... ,_ .. .... .._..
,�._...��;�� . ,. . : . .� �;, _ � . _ �:, .,,.. ��..;,. � _ :; . . , � .,.. ,. ... _ ..,,... �
`;
� � �T
��'' parking wi�thin a required 20 foot fi'ront yard
.Landscaped ��cea.
T'he staff fi:�nds a cnm�.rom�.se sol,�iti.on is appropr.ia�e,
thus thP applicant has �►�r�posed a G�� foot l.andscape�
area ��jacent t�he r:ight�>�nf"�way on SoWo Flall Blvd. plus
1.anciscapa.ng wi•t�h:�,n the exis�ing park.�ng aream The
staff f�nds ��hi� acceptable �f add:�t:�ona1. 1.ar�dscaping
:�s prr�vided un the inte�ior af the parking are��
The staff finds �the 1.a�dscaping an the interior of
the .l.o� i.nac�equate, and nc�� meeting the ,intent; of �
the Ti,ga�rJ �lun�.cipal. Ceaded 7'he s��f� �'�nds adcliti�nal
planting shoul.d be �equ�.red as �'o.lZows:
� . P1.ant.�ng a�eas ir� t�hP p�rking lo� shown c�ri the
submi��ed p1.an sho�l.d be er�l:arged to al�Dw
planting �.n a1:1 the sp�:ce r�ot; cur�en�l.y
u�i1.�.,z�d by �u��' s for. p��k.�,ngd ;
2. pl.anting should ocau� on {:he southerl,y porta.on of
the ex�.st;:�rag asphalt area south of �h� �ark�.r�g
1.ot and ad,��.cent th� raa..lroad righ'r-of-way. This �
lantin should .�,nclude lan materials that w�..1,1
P•
9
p
F
ui.�din mass to
� e arker� au'to s �.nd b
�, screPn h p 9
the no�th �nd e�,�i:,
3. Pl.an�ing �h�uld occu� along the �ace of the
existing bu.ild:�ny to fusther vi��ally sof��n
the ma.s� of thi.� hu,i.�cling fram SmW. Ha11. 81,vd.
4. Landscaping sl�c�u�.c� occur a.n two pa�al.le.L and �
oppos.i�e parkir�c� s��ll� oP the harthesn tier �
of par4�inq to mee�Eir�g �the T.iga.rd I�unicipal fi
Code requ�.rem�nt af one tree ?0 feet on center �
each way. (
5. 7he s�taff f'ir�ds al'J.. pl.ant�.ng areas shoulci bo
protect:ed by curb:ir�g where necessary �nd water
provided to �hese areas or other such assurance
tha�t plan•t rn��te�,i�.�.s will suxuive periads of
drough�t. 1"he ��aff f�,nrJs these �recautions
necessary to ensure maa.ntenance of the 1ai�dscap�ng.
B. S'taff Recommendat�.ons
1 . The staff �PCOm�enrJ� approval of the appl.�cant' �
1.andscape p,lan wa.th '�he cond�.t�.on tha{; the�
revis�d plan b� submi�ted f`car s�aff appraval
correct;ing the def'�.cienciss covered in the stafi f
�� f�:ndings.
Page 9 - PC Agenda � Augus� 7y 191�
. . � . � - . ... ;: ...;..r .. . <. , .;z i •,,�.
�:..... . .�t .�.
, � .-_, �.._..a��. .� _�..:��.
,.... :a
�._,,.,_..�. �„ ;_ � �; , ; . ., ,.. . . .__; ,._.a.,.. _, .._ . , .. .. . .
, � t- �_
�.� .' . . �
�°�`` Ce Cc�tnmi,ssa.on Ga,�r.us�i�n ar�d Act:i�n
1 . Law.%.� �tr�v�d ��;a ap�roup the p1.a� including the
s�aff a°ecommended conc�.xt�,ons and Ba�skhurst
second��iM 1`I`�e tt�o�t.�os� ���sed by a unanimous voteo
7.4 5�mbo d s (�Pstat,�rant
Loc��a.on� ;r�u�;he�s�r s�.r�e of F�acific Highw�y ,
45Q fee� sc�u�h of Hal�. Blvd. between
the I_,on� Q�k R�stau�an� and Tigard
(�1c�t�s�s
A. 5�aff Re�c�mmendaL-�c�n
1 a 1°he sta�'f recc�m�s�nd��l app�r�v�l c�f the appl.icant e s
sit� and lar�c��c.�.�P �S1�np �°he conr�it;ion tha� a
re��a�sed s.i�e pl.an k�e submittPd r�li.mina�ting one �
existing trpe and �tx°aightening �he curve on the �
dra.vew�y coranec��:�ng �u SoWa Ha11, B1vda �
Bo Comm�.ssion Discu�s�.on �r�r� Ar�ipn �
1 , Ba.�khu�;��L moued t�a a�pz�ve the submittPd �1.�n and �,
de.l.eta.ng t;he staf'f' recomt��nded conda.tione Lewis
�;: seconded �nd the mot:%or� p���ed by unanimc�us votee
7. 5 Ci�cle A W P��duc�s
Locat�.on� '�3885 5oW� 72nd Avenue
Am S�ta�f F`�.nda.r�gs �
1 e The si�aff po�.►-���d out �ha� ths submitted plan �
r�aes not mae� •the setback �equirements in th� �
�oning ord.inancpo Pl,ac.i.r�g the buil.d.�ng to WYthi,n
12. feet af the prope�ty where 20 feet is required. �
,
Staf P Recommenda�ta.ons
A. The staff recornm�nds a(��r�v�1 of the siabmi.tted site
and landscape p�.�n w�.th the condition that a revised t
pl�.n be suk�m�.tted �eflecting the required 20 foot �
sideya�d fns th� m-�� zone� �
Bo Hartman m�ved �o appruve �he submitted plan with th� ��
staf f �ecommended canc�:��i.c�ns, l_ewis secor�ded. The
motion passed by unanimr�us vnte.
9. 6 General. Te].�phone Pa:r.k.ing L.bt
� Locata,onm Di.zec�;ly behind ex�,sting Ca.ty Ha11 parking
10�, access on �urnham 5tg 34C1 east of I�ain St.
Page 10 - F�C Agenda � August '7, '1973
� ....:;: . . _ �. _ _ .. .. ._ ._....� . . . ,_ ... _..._.,....
, , �. �`.
4
�:�:
A. Staff Recommendats.o�s �
1 � 5taff' r,ecanamp�de�1 •�h�t; ac�.ien on th�o �ub�a.���ted I,,
plan b� tabled untyl � r.evised plan may be '
subm�.ttacl c�rt�`a��a�nq to the standaids of th�
Sa.t� Dev�:l.rapment Plan review seci�.ion of the '
o�dinancea Ba�kh�.f�s�t moved and N�.coli ssconded
tc� table cor�sider.�at.�,nn to tt�e Aug��st L"I , 1973 I
hea�ing.
9v7 7iga��f Wa�e� D.i.s��.�.c�
A� The sta�f �ecnmc�en��rJ that the Ta.gard Water U�.s�r,ict
bQ �equi.rer� tc� st��ma.t a S.i.t� Dev�l.op��ent p.�an�
Bo Cornmission Discuss.ic�n and Ac�ians
1 . Har�trian rnn�ed �n ��blP co�as�.dQ�ati.oh to the August
21 , 'I y73 hearing �n a1..�ow 'ch� t�.a�;er dis�rict
to �ubt�i� a ��te deve�.Qpment plan. Lewis
s�conded and the n�o�ion was p�ssed Wa.th N,ico1,.�
and Barkhurs� abstaa.r�ing�
908 Lamb-Westc�n
`��-"' Ao S�taff Recornn��r�d�tzon �
1 . The �taff ��cor��nand�d �pproval r�F the revisACJ
landscape �S1.an �as ar� amendment to �the l�ndscape
p1.an �.pr�roved by f�he P1�,nning Cr�mm.�.ssion on
J�a1y 17, 19730
e. Commission Di,sc�assian �nd Actian
1 . Ba�khu�st moued �nd Ha�tm�n seconded to app�oue
the �mended plan as �ubm�.ttedo The motion passed
unanimously wa.tFa Whi�t�ker abstain.ing.
10. MISCEI..I_ANEOUS
10. 1 Culv�r Construct�,on Company
A. Staff Find�.ngs
10 The staff described thr� applicant° s request to
gain the Planninq Commission's suppart in
acqu,�.r�.ng 10 fe�� from the 5t�te Highway De�a��meht �
along an existirag 2� foot easetneht to all,aw const- I
�uction af a mntel �djacent the Highway 21? '
Pacifa.c Highway in�erchangee ,
�
B. S��aff Recammenda��,on
1 . 7'he staff �gcommended �hat �he 'F.Co no� support
Page 11 - PC Agend� � A�agust 7, 1973
�.. .: _ �. _ . ,: . . ..
� : . �. ... . . . .,
. . ---em-,�.--�.+�.� . .. . . � ... . .. . . . .. . ..
� ...... . .. . . , . . .... ,..4... , .. . ... .. . . .... ....a � . .. . .�..� .. ..... .�...,A t v. . _ ':wt.�' ,
. . . �M � �. � . .. . �, . . .. . �. . . . . �., - � . �� .. � .
�uy'n�.: . .. . . . . . . . ' .. . .
the appl�,car�t° s �.�equest t�o the State.
C� Commission b.�.scussion �nd Aeti�n<
'I o A�'ter d�.scussing �he rPqwest �.t Was agreed that
the R�anning Commission wc�uld nnt aid i�he
applicant �n hi.s effoxts to abtain an �dditional
ea�er�ent from the State Highway Depa�tment, @
11 . AUJOURN�IEN7 �
�
�
�
�
�
��,
y'
�q
4
�r
I'
�
�
�
�
C
�
�
�
1
1
(
�:,�. . . . � . � . . .. �
PagE 12 - I�C Agenda - Augtast 7, 997�
, . , ........._.._�^..�;.�... _
� � � �r- ��� ,��_��� =���
�;� ��i
� ��;
'�
� 3 .
' � TICoARD PL�IM1�iING COI�R+�Q�I4.N ,
St�a!! R�gnrt
August 7, 1�73
Cor��inued trnm July 17, 1973)
Ag�ncle� It,e�o i
AC 3-73 �
,
;
�
Zone c�e,nge �
�
For propexty iocat,ed betMSen Igtersta�te 5 egd Hi�Y 217, ;
in t� Ti�rd Tri.angle, aad baundea on the north by ve►c�ted ''
Irvtng Street�, tma Lamb �leston e�mplex and, the proposed '�
Lincalrx Propertiee olYice c�o�aPlex (�e►x l�p 231 1D, 'lb►x Lots
lpp.a 2�, 3pQ, 1►p0, 5pp, �Ol, 70T attid 1100)` ,.
;
��lioent
F.I.G. �io].diag Oompa�Y
pgplie�nt"� Eie� ;
: � ;;
; �� pgpraval 04' e ch�a�e 3n zoae cla�siflc�tlon rrom R•7, ��
� single Fam��y Residenti,e►►]. to C-3, i�en�ra►1 Ouimeraiwl ta �,
� P�U, Flanned Davelopm�nt. � ��
A 11 c�ant°s P sa1 �
_�.
To divic�e "the s1t� into four se�nea�s o! Srom 2 to 5 �c�s. ;
�ivisioning three se�sen�a �o lde d�evalaysed i�n office �celated
� use 1n 2 to 4 story buildinga vith �► mnxi�uaa of 170,OUO sq.
'� ft. of building �rd e fourth sega�ent t,o be davaloped iato a
'� 150 wnit motor hptel vith reLtesi supportive lacilities
� (resta�ursnts, ioeeti:ng rooma, etc.)" quated 4ia� page 12 of
s; applicant's propoeal• Tl�e aPplic�at `rill aubmit a revi$ed
� concept shor+i.n$ oi=lce snd rel�'ted supportive facilitias
� on t2� proposed motel sita. This he�s b�reu d�ona ta provide
}, an sl�ea�nste conoeptw►1 use i! a motel inv�estor ceuuiot be tound.
•n
� to locete on thi:s sits.
I �� Revised St�►ft Findin6s
l. The epplieent hsa sub�itted s preli;minary c�e�►�slopm�ent
�,,. plsn and progran to tbe pLnning Co�misaion tor sn ;approval,
� in principel of their proposal• According to Chspter ,;
i8.56.oao (b:) (c) (a) ,►na� (e) oi �cbe Ti�.ra t�r.►�.ci� coa�e. `
, ..
.
, � ��.� :��� . ..���
.� -= . . _
, . . . ... ._ . . � � � ... . . . ... . . . . ,.'., ...,.,3
,� ' . � . � � . �
) �
Xp -^ . f. �'' '��.
�� Tl�e P1�unniaa ao�iesion sl�all�-lntoxtslly revin► the °�
� � ' preli�nicr�ry d�ev!elop�usu� p�lsn wd �tr� �d toay aat
t to gra�� preliminwry appro'v�]., ap�x'owe1. ltith racoa�ttixl+sd
t � modifications or den�sl. Sua� �et�on sh�ll be bssed upon tho
aamprebensive p].an, t�he ats►nd�rds of this titl� and other
reg�].stions snd t�he euita►bility o! the propos�d developmeat
i�a relation to the cl�ra�ct�r o! tl�e ar�a.
i�pproval in principl.� o� the prellninary cUv�elopment pL�n
and program sl�11 bs limited to t7ns preli.minary acceptnbility
of �he lacxd us�s propoaed and tbeir inter•rslationshlps u�d
s2�11 not be conatrued �o endorse pr�cige locatir�a o! use,s nor
enginaering teasibl3:it�r. Ttse Planning Gbmmis�ion trr�y� rsquire
tha development of otl�r inYormation the►n tlost speci�ied in
Sec'tion ].6056.030 to b� submitted with tbe getye�'al d�velop�oea►t
. p].an a�d pro�e►m.
The Ple�nning Comoniss3an �he�l]. review a� msy recommend exp�afon,
additions or mociiticat�,ona in the guslifice�tiana of the propc►eed
design team !or the pxAepwratiaci of th�e general plan eud progran.
The Plnnr�ing Commission ahe►11 determine the extent ot any
' add.itiansl mo�rket analysis to be ix�cluded ia the ger�ml
develo�ment plan and progrt►m.
��,,. 2. 'rhe ste�ff finds the appliceuxt's submissions ara cc�mpleta
end constitute a prtlimixie►ry derrelopmen� pL�a and progrem
as described 1$.56.020 of the Tf��rd Municipal Code,
(
3. The sub,ject site is desi�oated "It�s�.d,ential-Can�aercia�." on
� ' the 'Pig�rd Community P1sn. According tp tla�e t.ext ot' this
,�lari, "this cstegory is interu3,ed. to accomoc�sdte higher-d�asity
dwe.L�ir�g structures, includ.ing, higk►-x�ise agartments, ��oobina�d
r+ith a rsnge of co�patible office ana business u�es. Jln
agreeable ersarigement o! 'mi�osd laxd uas' in these �re�as can
best 'be achieved if Lr�e tracts are dev�lopecl es 'planned
units"' . The Ti�e►rd Commtuiity Plan contixiues, sta�ing
"t.hese aress (i.e. resid�entie.l-oomcoercial) ere intended to
have an 'urban quslity� ,aot unlike tbe redeveloped eection�
' of dorrntoxn Port,],and� Hfgh-rise and lovr-xise sp�rtments,
and service establishmeats, xi],1 combine to crs�te an urban
ercvironm�nt cl�ractert�ed by diversity �ctivity end a�menity.
� The stsPf Pinds ti�at the prelimiz�ary development plan and program�
as submitted, contorme to the Ob,�ectives ot the Ti�srd Commun�t�r Plaua.
�
Pe�ge 2- Stalt Report - 2C 4-73 - ;�uguat 7, 1973
�
,
.,
�; . ;:�
,�.�:::, ,. c�:w•� ,�„w .;;: .a w�. .,:�,,.;.:.r�.�. ,w,_..:
��_ ,x�..
�t..
z:�,�r
{\ Y �'
;�. .
, 4. '�h�a atsf! linds tY�e pr��i�►ry al�w]�a�en� �L►n e�a�d pro�n►a�
'_ � �o be 3n contmrroanae vit►h ths unaatopt�d Ti�'ad '1'ri�n8ls
� Developrxnt Plan, etib�I.yt.� �l�s laeid i�ses �d d�tvelqymaxet
- preir►ciplea �et lorth �.n the Trisngle P],an.
5. Th�e ste�fY tinds, tt�st basacl upon conversstions with tlx
�PP�icant snd their ��e�at, th� applicant agr+ees to meet
th� steucie►rde titl� 18 �d..otriar rag�ilati�ong embodied
in th� Ti�ard Municipsl Gotle as relates tha epplicanx's
proposed. de�relapment ia Planc�ed Dev�elopmer�t Distr�cts.
6. TY�e ste►ff finds the prelini�e►ry d�evelopafeat p],an and pro� 'to
be competible with t2a�e �ui.st�.n� ct�racter aY th�e aree. '1"�e
I-5 Preerre,y amd. �►vex�ton-+Ti�uurd E�ress`+m►y roY°m t�+�o aid�s
of the site, rith tkre I�►nb-Weston and propossd I.inaolr► .
� Properties office comple�oea borde�ring the northarn portion j
of the site. These ad�aceat uses sre similar and ao�pstible . �
vith the proposed dev�elopment. i
7. Ti�e �.I.G. Holding CompanY bas desig�nated the Architectuasl
Fi� of Broome, 3elig e�nd Oringdulph ss its "design tesm"'o' '
This firao hss an ability to accomplish �he planning and da�si�
work neeessury to carry� tbe px°o,�ect through tY�a g�a►eral �
final plans and programs. Ttiis firm 1z�B refi.ained Gornell, <
' HoWland, Hay�es +�nd l�srryfield end Clsir A. Iii]1 Associates �
�_ ((�,�1�,/I4111 j as engineering can�a.lta,nt on this p�,�ec�. Thi:s
, fi�cm canducted the ta�utt'ic esn�lysls incox�orated in t�as aub�it�ASL
� preliminary dev�elapment pl.s� anc� pro�am. Lsc�iscape a�chitectural
�� serv�icQSS �ril1 also be pr��rided by consulting stat'Y members ��SC
.� �roome, Sel ig ��nd. Oria�dulph o �,
�;
� Staff lxse revisvad �nd is femiliwr rrith the que��ificsLions
I'' of theae firms wd finds �thes� firma kave the qualificntions
to prepare e �enersl dev�elaproant plsn and program oP the
���_ comp].exity proposed.
�: �
$. Tt�e staff finds tlx mork�at lafarrnatidn by the applicpnt, sutfiaiant
to render an opinion on ttae fessibility o� the submitted pa�eliminary j
,;
plan and pro�am.
�
�� 9. At the request ot tbe �tuff, the sppllcant `+as requeatea to address
� the requirements of the "Fes�uw" decision. A reply to this �
� request is contsinod ia the documoents submitted by the appllawt ��
;.
w{� entitlrci "A Zoning Propose►� for an Of!'ice-bbtor 13otel P�rk for ,i
j± Fsrmers Inaurance Group". ll,n ac3d�es�dum to this documsa�t xsa �;
also subm�tted to the sta3'!. Additiouel supplementary information
i ia to be avsiLble to tbe stsf� and Planniag Commission by
.�' ,� August 7th. t;
� `
` Page 3 StaTP Report - zC 4-73 • A��t 7, 1973 i
r �s
1� . � � �. � � .. .. � . � � � � � � . .. � � .. � � ..
� . .. . . . . .. � . � . .
� � . .. . � . . . . � � . . ... - � �_ ' . .
� . . . . . . . . . .
� . . . . . . . � . _ .
� �
� t — t ,��'
� .. �a
�`
,
� �.
Fertinent to the Fasano d�ecisio,�►, the etatt tinds the spplicant
has s+�stisiactorfly met t�Le ��ority of requiremen�ts aet tort� in
:
tYae Fesano case by Prov�;ng canform�ncme witrA th�e TiAa►rd Oammunity
Pl.gn, _chazzge3 in condition, aoam�unity n�eed, bett,er suitabiliLy �f
sub�ect site over otber si�s �can�ed Sos the' same purpc�se� and aimi�asl
effect or� tht surroundiag coe�unity. Tt�e on1y�questionable srea,
relsted to Fasano, Would be tbe svaila►bility o� publlc services.
At the present tirme s ser+�r more►torium is in et'�ec� until ,August
13, 1973. It is u�nd,erstoc�d that'this imoratqriuu� and the subsequent �
p.roposed quots system me►y liaiit se�reyj;availability unti,l the '
UniPied �vea��e;A�ency's Durhesm-Tre�►tment Plant is completed in
the Fall of 1975• �,
�
Additiox�a,l,ly there is ttye questio�ns of adaqust.e water avei]sbility
for fire ro�ectiom iron tbye Nlatz�er �k►ter Diatrict. - Mr. Bob 3ent,e�s �''
P ,
of this distriet hss been contacted x�gsrding thia question'and
vrill respond by Augu$t 7th. �
3taft finds the questionsble availability o� sewer and water s�x°vice:s �I
a temporary situa�tion en�i. n�t o� scaf'iicient me�gni�tude to d�lay
�:
� consideration of t�e spplic�t's pz'crFo.s�s.1. , �
�� �
Staf� Aeaomme�d�tioas� ;
' 1. Staff recom�nds tho applicant's prelimi��y ;deve2opment � �;
plan end pro{iram be approv�ed. k':
�
2. Stsff Recom�ends the planni�g coa�iesion �request the applic�nt �`
show special eonc:ern for tha Yollowing ;items 'in tkie subsequent �-'
general cievelop�oent plan snd program. `A
a. Access and meintenwnca e�greements for the S.iV. 66th-
68th Av�nue loop and re�vin� pe:rk ax� through the :
sub�ect sii:e.
b. Avaia.ability e�n8 e►deqwey of sa�rer a,nd aster service i;
to the site.:
c. DeYinition d the proposed staging o! tbe pxo�GCt
and tl�e problems inberent in me►rketing a :non-residentisl` ;;
pro,�ect, :'
, ,
� � � � � �v'�
� ' Page 4 - Staff Report • ZC �►-73 - August 7, 1q73'
�,
;�
;�
� �
,, ,, , _ �
. c�,.,,����.r.a.......�.. �.._.
�3:?::.�ri::n�aM _.d.w�, . . . . . . . .. . ..:.,i, . . . . .... . . ..:.
:'S
��. . _ . � . . � .. .
i
� . . . . . . . . . �'y ... .
e r
3. StaYP rec�ommenda thi►t th�s firss or sroome, Selig an�
� Oringdulph, Por�tle►n� aad Cor�ell, Ho�+.]�►nd, H�►y�es, �d �
Merryti�ld•CLir A. �i11', Asao�iates Portla►nd end Corvallis, �
be aStirmed as a clesi� team qualiYi�d to prepere the �
�
ganera]. plan nad,prog�nuio. +
;
, l
�
;
.
�
i
�
�w.. l
c
' � . � . . � . . . . .. � ' . . Y
� . � . .� . . .. . � . � . �i.
f. . . " . . � . ... � . .
. . . . . . '� . _ � .. - .. . � . . . . � . . . . �� � � . . . ,.,
I : . . . . . . . . .. . . . . �. . . . . � . , '�
. . . �' . . .. . � . . . , . ' . . . . .�
i �
. . . . . � . � . � .. . . �. . ' � ... � � ... . . . .. . � . . :.I
. . . . .. .. . . . .... . � :�I
.. � . � .. . ... . . . . . �. .. � .. . . � .. . � . .. . 'F�)
i sl
; ,
jj
l-
�
� �
�
Page 5 - St�►�r Report - ZC 4-73 = 1lugust 7, 1973 �.
� ��
. +�
. _ �
��,: �. �:
� �, ��
f;
�'
�:..; TIGARD FLANN11Wf� COhII�iISSION 4
�
StaP� R�port ;
i'
r.
Augus�t 7, �.973 �;�
Item 5.1 ;'
CU �3-73
�'�
,.
Cona.�.tiorial use '
For ra rt located north a� F1�1nut Stree� and 400 �eet ��
P Pe Y
east o�' S.W. 121.st Avenu�, ad.,jacent the Brookw�ay Subdiviaion. !�,
i
licaat �I
,
Arrow Heating Company ��.
i�
A�plicant's Request ,
4
Conditiona,l use appraval to allow duplex dw�711ng un.ita 3.n �
�
arx R•15, single family residenti.al zone. (
� Applic�n�'s P�oposal
To subdivide 2.5 acr�s in.to 8 duplex 1.o�Gs in s tof,a�. subdivisiqn
prc�posal� that @ACOID�SSCS 9.77 ac�s and ineJ,udes 10 lots for
sing].e family resia'lenti�l development.
r
.Existing Canditions �
F
q
Surrounding Land Use: �
's
A residential subdivisian exists to the west, forested land �
�
tu the n�rth and south and sr,mttered res�.dential an,d e,griaul�ural :
uses to the �ast. �
Surrouuding� zoning: G
�
i
R-7 zoning exists ad�a,cent ��e south �nd w�st sides �f the sita. �
Suburbe►n Resider�ti.al zoning exists ac�,iacent the �,o�h �nd north+eastern
portion ot' the s3te. ,� duplex c4n�tional use was approved on the
south side of Walnu't, ad�cent tbe sub�ect site, last A�ril.
Accesst
� Public acaess to �h�e site is providecl by 580 feet o�' frontage
on S W. Walnut Street and 57U feet o� Pron�Eage on S.W. 12��h
Avenue. The northerly portion p� t�e site� is ad�acent a�
unnamecl creek in�diceted on the �i8�rd Coromunity P]�n as a potentia�.
greenway area.
. ��.��-'- �
W:y- � �a..� .
1
U't'e�l.�ti��.5 i
� Water is available �rom th� Ti$ard Water Dis'trict and sewer
service from th� Utti,�i�d �e�rage Agcney.
Interim Sfi,afP Racomm�ndatian:
Sta��' h�s cAnvez�sed w3�th the app].ic�nt cancerning hi8 pxoposed
appl3cation and the streat st�nd�rds setforth in tha City of
Ti�rd Subdivision Code, Th� applicaaat he�s been informed as 'to
h�s opt�.ons re�rding his application and has requested tl�s
item be tabled until the Augus� 21, 1973 hearing, so ��at we
may �u�,.].y consider his optior�s �nci ins�ruct t� st,o�f as to haw
he vig2�es to pxoceed.
St��'f recommends tabling th�.s item utYt31 the ,�ug,ust 41., 1973
,hearing.
�, �
i _
i
Page 2 - Sta�P Repoxt - CU 13-7� - August 7, 1973
� ,
r-. . .., ,_
��� ��
b` ��
`a�.,` �4_;
TIG;�tD P1.ANN�1� COMMISSION �
� ' StsPf �epox't �
Subdivisi.ons - i're].lminary P].at 1A,pproval �
August 7, �973
7.1 Engle�rood (Commonweal�h Pro�erties)
In�erim Staff A,ecomrooendation ;
i
Tha apglieant has requested this item be tabled until such
t�me as the con�licts between the sulbciivi$ion and zaning
ord3a�nces ara resolved.
St,af� rpeommenids tabling �his item until these canflicts are
resolved or the a�plic�►nt wishes to revise his p].at to meet
exist�.ng Qit�r subd.ivisi�on stand�rds.
7.2 Yake �rr�ne (,�x�raw Heating CompsnY)
Interim S�taff Recomm�ndation
This is re7.at�d to f,te�m 5.1 on the Ag�nda, a�d. for the same
�_ a�eea�sons, the app�,ic�►nt r+equests t+�bl.�ng until ,Augu�� 21, 1973
heer�.ng
Staft' r�aommends tabling �h�s item until Au�us� 21, 1g73•
�
�,., : _ , ,
;
�,; �'IGAR]D PLANNZNG (o0N�1IS�TON
S'Gaft' Report
Site Dev�elopmsnt P1an Rev3.ew
AuBust 7, �973
9.1. Sucilow Apa'r�ments
Loca,tion: North o� Walnu� aixd �+50 �e��t east o� Pacitic Highwsy
Sta�f Eindings
BtafP has x�v3.e�w�ed th�e ��plicax►��s site and landacap�ng plans
and. Pinds these plans ta be i,n �cor�f"ormsnce �3th the intent and
standards aet �art�a 3.n Ghspter 1�3.5$ oF �he Tig�ard Mun3.ei�a1.
Code.
Sta�'f Recommenc'1�tion
S'tafP reeou�ruis agpxoval o�' the sit� and landscaping plans as
submitted by the appl�,can�.
� 9.2 Pudget Die Cssti.ng
�,ocation: 7� S.W. Bonita Road
��f F3ndin�s
Th3.s sit� d;ave].opmen� p]mn review item has been a sou�ce oY' cor�us3.on
to the st�f"t' an�d agplican� as related to th� Ti�srd City Cocie. A� ca�
be seen in Fr�d Anc�erson�s memorandum oP Ju].y 2�+, 1q73 sntitled "Yand- ;I
scap�i;ng Requirements•Front Space 5etback-F'ark3ng �,rea-�M�-2 ea�d: M-3 ',
7,ones", the Pl�,r�n3.ng Commiss3an must take 3�nto �ce�unt the standarr�s ?�
of the Stte De�r+elopment Plan Rcview section oY the Tig�rd Muncip�]. i
Gode. This must b� c�one eve�n i.P a p�►rking 1ot he�s 'been cons�ructed in !
accarc�nae with another section of th�e Ca�de. �
1
App�rently this interpret,ation he,s not been mad,e clear to epplic�nts i
in the psst, thus they 2�ave, like Puclget Die Cast�ng, been pqving to �
within 2 �'eet oY their front property lines. �
1
Th�e stat'f' feels that some eam�rami�e is in order for each case j
aad 3.n this case the staZ`� reQOUanended the appl�cant landscape a a
7 foot front y�rd. This has been complied �►ith.
� �
.
� _ :. ,: .. _
4+�.__ 4
2. The atafF P9.nds �the gpplicant has rua�t subm�.t�ed a 1�andscape
plan me��ing the submission requirements s�t forth in Section
� 18.58.030 (c) o� the Tigard Niunst�ipag. Cnd�, speei�ical].y
r�lating to '�tl�e �.oeation and design o�' landseapec� areas„ the
vari�t�es and sizes of �trees and �lant m�ter3a�ls to 'be plau.t�ad
on the site, other perti.en,ent landscape features s�zid. irri�at�on
�Ystems required to rpQintE►'in trees and plant material.s".
3. Tb�e staaff f3nds �hat trees �reanot shown at 70 �'eet on center
in �erk�.ng exeas as requ�.rea by sect�on i8.58.080� T'i�d
Mt�n�.cipal Code.
�+. Tbe staff f3.nds that tk� applicants prog�sal. to fi11 Fanno Cre�l�
. Flood. P].a�.n 3s not in the publia in�terest. Fi.tling along k'�+arino
Creek decreases th�e �ek'� abi].ity �o success�'ully cary a ma3or
flood. Thus inereasing the �lood danger to othex l�.�e ex�d �roperty
along Fanno Creek. F3.17.ing al.so disrupts th� nstux�.7. vegetation
along the stream banks. This 'v�egetation controls emsion and
consequent siltation, as xell as providing aestheti� beauty and
wi.ld l�.fe habitat.
Th�e sta�'f fi.nds the �pp1.3,eant� proposal d�s not meet th� s�.edndards
e�nd. polieies se� P�rth � the Ti�ard Comvnunity P1Rn atad requixed in
section 18.58.100 (�)
�
Staf'f Reca�ex�ia�ion
The s'tafi'f' recom�err�ds d:[:�apprav�l. oY the s3te and ].exadseaping p1aYi
as subm3tted. The s't�ff suggests the applicant resubmit zie�.►,,�plans
re:l�,ting to the standards and palicies set forth in tY� Tigard
Cammun�.ty Plaz� and �nicipsl Code.
PaB� 2 - Bite D�evelopment P1an Re�riea - Au�ust 7, 1973 '�
�
: _ . , .. , __ .
.
, _ ,
..."'�' • . , �� .�,.._ ..�_.. ..._... `
.._. .. .. .... . ......_ k ,
. . ... ,_ .._ . ..... . . .. .. .�. i.:,
.. tii
� � f` � � ��'
{ ;
� .
�,
� �
9.3 coiumbia �rar�ooa�. & mo�.a3r� r ';
I�acation: 1.2700 s ow. Hal.]. �3�.vd. � ;
,
S'ta�'f F'inclings: �';
,,:
___�__ ,.�:
��.```
The staf'� finds tY� applicant�s proposa�. 3.s s3mila� �o the Pudget � `,,
D i e C a s t i n� c a s e, r e l ati n g to p aving For parki�g wi.thin a required i ;
� „
20 fap�t �'ront yard 1�od:scaped are�.
� � ,��i
� :
�he st�:ff finds a campro�ise solution is app�opriate, thus the �
ap�licant �as proposed a �+� foo� lan�d.scaped areea ad�acent �Ghe � �
right�f'�-way' on S.W. Ha].:L Blvd. plus landscap3.ng withix� the � ;�
existing parking area. '� sta�'f �'inds t�his accept,able if additional. x R
' ]„andsc,aping is prov�,dec1 an tYte interior o�' �he psrlci.n8 �xea. _ `,
The s'taf�' f3.nds th� lands�ping on tk�t: interior of the �.ot inadequat�� ,
siad. ric�t meetiz,g th� intent of the T��'d I�in3.�ipa� Cc�tle. The staf�' �'inds , ,
�►c'ic13.�iana]. pJ.axxting s3wuld be req,u�red as folltiows: t.Li
, ,
�.. Pl.�ntin� are�s in the parrk3.n� �.ot s2wwn or� the subm3.tted �,a.�n
1 {��
should b� enlarged to a7.l.ow planti.ng �.n a1.1. �he ..sp�ae not t a
�
cur�ently uti�.ized by �uto's �`or par'k3.x�8� �f',
�; � �
,�
2. Pl��Gi.ng stwu].d occu� a�7.�� '��� �+�ce �� the �xisting lau3.lc33ng �,;
to �'urtlner visu�lly sc►f"ten the me�ss o� tkt�s build3.ng �x°om ��
1'�
�J��• L7R�6-�. 8�.�.• �'�
�e P�.�+'fiJ.11� B�lO�.C� q�Cl� Q21 �i� sautherly portion of tb.e �existing r`'�
e�sphol.t area, soutk� of the Pe►r�ng lqt and: ad,�acent the railroad �;
r�ght-o�'»w,e�y. '�s �l.anting sY�ot,r�d imclude plan me�ter�.a].s '��t 4::
�ri11 ser�en the parked. auto°s �and building mas� to the zwrth and ,�•,'
i';
�LiS�'.. (;
1;
�+. I,andscapi��; ��ou3.d occur in twa para7lel e�nd apposi�e �rk3,n8 ;'
stal'l.s of ��k�� �orther °t�er of pa�rki.ng to meetir�g the +�i�ard �:;
Municipal. Gc�� x'equi.rement �f an�e tree 70 feet on center each ;,�
;,�:
w�y. s;,
I
;,
5� � St�,g�' finds a],], pl,a�i�ing areas sYwuld be protected by eurbin,g �,
where neeessary eud water prov3.d,ed to these aa�as or ot'h�r sucb
assuraxice that plant �aterials yr1.11. survi:ve periods o� drou�ht. �
The s�e►'ff ��.nd.s these preca,ut�ons necessax�y to ensure n�aintenar�ae ,
oP the ].a�ndscaping � s
�
� page 3 � 5ite Development Revi.ew �
f
�
,
I
(
,
. �
_ ,. . .
_ . _ � �.
�� � � �
�,,:;
�.�:, St�aYY Recommendations
Sta�'f recommends �he Planning Commissian approve the app�.3cants
landscape plan With the fol.�owing eond�.tions:
l. The app].icaz�t submit for staff appro`ra1., a revised lendscape
pla�z, meeting the po3;nts aovered �,n the staff findings of thi.s
reques�.
� 9.�+ S�mbo's Restaurant
Zoc�tion: Southesst side of �'scific Highway �+50 �'eet s�uth
o� �iaa].7. B].vd., betw�en the Lone O�lc Restaurant snd
Tigard Mt�tors '
�
,
I
StaYf Find3ra�gs '
,
'�he sta�f finds the applicant°s sit� and landsc�ping p.laxis substantial�y ;
meet th� reg,uirements set �`orth ir� Tit1,e 1$ oP the Tig�rd Munieipl� �
Caie. ;
�
The s�a�'f finds, however, th�;t one item, the dz�3.veway �'rom �.W. 1��.1 �
� Bl�rd.., endae�;eres pu'blic safety in its present aligcam�nt. Sta��'�'
o re �rve exis�ti ve e��ic�n
reGOgnizes the applicant s intent tc> p s �8 � ,
but finds tbe public s��ety� mus�t take �rreeedence.
G
�taff Recommendation &
,a.
�fiaff recommends the Plann3ng Commission appmve the applicant�s si'�e and a
landseaping plan with the following condi�ion: �
,
�
1. The applicant submit, Por staff appxoval, a revised 7a�dscage i
�
• pl,an, eliminat3ng orae e�cist�.ng tree and straightexiing th�e cwwc�vve i�;
and improving site distanc� on the drivew�e►y connecting to ,
S.W. Hall Blvc�.. "
�
�
r
�
9.5 Circle A & W Products �
i
�;
Location: 13885 S.W. 82nd �,.venue ��i
�i
Staff k'indi�ngs `
�
The sta�'f f3nds the site plan does not meet the se�back standards set ;
,
forth in the Ti�axd M�icipal (iode. A twelve foot �id��rd 3,s �shown �
� on �he site plan, where a 20 foot sid.�yard is required. �,
�
, .
._.�.. ��_ . . _ ... ._ �:.. , ,�� t ��� , , �. � , ����..� ,
�.� �., �
�5 The s'ta�£ f�,n,ds t}�e lsndscape �].an, submittecl by t�e ap�li�ant,
,,.w. �to meet the st.and�rds se`t Yorth in 'Title 18 of �he Ti�rd
Municipa,l flocTe�
StaYf Recommendatian
The s'taYf recommends the Pl.anning Commission approve th� site �nd
Ta�dsca,ping �1:an as subm;tt�sd wi.th the fallowing condi.tion�:
l. That the app]�icant submi�t a revised site plari, r�flect�.ng
the 20 �'oot sideyard setback requ3.remen� for M-2 zor�d
1and, as sta��d in �ect�on i8.4�.0�0 0� the ��gard Municipal
Cpde.
�.5 GExxe�a]. '1'�1.ephone �z°kir� Z�ot
Loeation: Directly behind eycisting City H�l.l. gaxking lot,
aecass on $ux'nhetn Streety 340 e�st of Main Street
;
Sta�f F�.aldings �
"i
St�f'� �in,ds the spp�.i�ant kaas submit�ed two slternate pa�king ��ns
for � parking ].ot to se�e the3.r r�ee�r of'f�ce faci],it�r locst�d. on S.W
��` Maiu Street.
T}�e staf�' �inds the �,pplicant has n�ot sub�nitted � :Lazidsc;��e
0
plan necesssry �or p.].anning commission �ction.
]aa
�
T}� staff �.s concerned a�out safe pedestrian aceess f'rom tb� �
propased �rking lat to the b�il.c�..i..ng served 1ay such psxking �'
�.
StaPf Recomm�xadstion `
�
StsSf re�ommends the Planning Commiss�an table thi.s item until. sueh z
time as a lanclscape plan is submitted for review and, ac�ion. The ;
travel&3romSthet�rkPPlilcant�,a�t�irro�Pice�acfl�,iana are to saPe�y �
P� �8 Y �
�
9.7 Tig+�rd Water District - Shop Adi,�lli.tiox� 4�
S
i
Loca'��.on: S.W. C�.aterbux�y L�ne, ad,ja,cen� e�ti.sting r�servoi�s
on Littla Hull Mountain betwee�. S�W. 106th and 3.W. 103rd. ��
� � E
5taff �inds t}ae applicant I�s not met the submission requiremei�ts �
set �or�h in Sect3on 18.5$.030 of the Tigiard Mwn3.cipe�l, Co�e� This ;�
i,ncludes the submi�ss3on caf an adequate 7,ar�uisaaping P�, ��►��A6 �
�� ` 18nd.scaping ta ad,jacent uses,.
�
�
�,. ��:
Staff �'inds �he e�ci.sting site has 'been recently annexred to the Ci�y.
° The site retaias the Washington Coixn�ty zan,ir►g, Rr7 Single Fam�1y
=4 Re�idential. The ex3.stir�g use w�,a grsiated through a con�tional u�e
�pproval granted by Washington �ounty in i969. 'I+he (7nun�y's policy
permits e,xpansian of aond,��ional uses witYaout ��eqgglicatr��fn,sx�nr3�►�:��,.:•;,�
aonditi:ona]. use�
Stsft' Reeommenc�tion
�tsf�' recomm�ends denial of tk� applicsnts requegt for Sit�e Development
F1sn RevieW approv�l and requests the applicant subm3�t a d�tailed
landscape plan sensit3v�e to tl� su�rrotindi.ng residentie�l. use. Staff
also rcquest the app�lir,ant submi� a letter tn the Planrxing Cbmmissi�n,
detai],ing the intenc�ed use oP �he shop addi��.on.
9.8 L�mb-Weston OfPice Addi�ion
Loc�tien: 6600 S.W. giampton Street west of existing bu3�.ding
Stsff k'�.ndings
S�aP�' Yinds the applic�n.t has request�d a re^vision �n �heir
sits and lsndscape pl�ans by ttse Pl�xaaiing tbtnmission on ,]�.y �17, �973
�,'l�is ravis�an i,s due to a corporr�te cLecis�oa� no� to c�nstx�uct one
�� modu�e of the pxopased bu3.].ding add3.tion. The area elim3.nat�d �rom .
bu3lding cc�v�ra� has been prop�sed �or landscaping in;�a manxier
acceptable tv the sfiaf'�.
Sta�r Recommendatian
St�f'�' recommends approval of the revised l�ndscape plan as an
amenduooant to the landsaape plan approved by the P].�nning Commo�.ssian
on ,hil.y 17, 1973• '
�
i
l
�
i
}
E
�-:
_ ._.... ,, .,. ._ ,
� , _ .
� t��'' �°
: �ti�.��
TIC.AR.T2 PL�iI�iNING COMMTSSI�N
Sf.s�'f Kepvrt
Subdivisiwns b',,i�.irr�r,�Iaand:�:�rtitioni,ng
August 7, �9?3
8.,1 Irvington�MAOre ;
I,�cati.on: 82C35 S.W. Hunz�.ker Strsety ad�eeer��t I3eu►z�er on 1
w�sterly �xtremity of Irv3.ng�an-Moore site.
This is a proposal by th� Irv�gton-Mr�are �ompany to partition � �
.96 acre parcel of and �'rom �heir existing 14 aca�e site. � '
purpose of this pa�rtitioning is to pxovid� site �'or an of'�ice buiZd3ng to �
ser've their ��,.stiz� �snufactur3ng com�lex. ;
�
S�ba�� Findings �
,
. Q
1. 'Th�e partitioned. �rc�l, as praposed is ad�acent a�ad t�s �ed�q��e �
access az�t� S.W. Hwnziker Str�et and d;aes rwt create a str�et or �
way. �
�;
�. The ap�l.�cant� h�s subm3�-ted �n adeyaate sketch map, fulfillir�
� the requirem�nts aet �oztta in Seetion 17.2�+,020 0� the �i�d
A�an��ipa1, Cc�de.
3. The staYf Yaas determined the applica;n,t d,o�s n,ot intenc�. to 3�.vide
the existing �.ot into mare ��ian th� progos�d smpl.l parce3.. �
�fj
4. Tl� stafP �3.nds the appli�arat's propoeal does not conf'lict aith `''
�{
�►pplieable sta�dar�is �ro subdiv3.sion set forth ir► C2�pter 17.24 0� the ��
Tipe►rd Mun�lc�p�l, Gode. ��
�:
5. �e app�icant has xwt dedicated suf^ff.cient right-of'-�ray �width along '_
S.W. Hunz3.l�er 5treet far future �treet improve�ents. S.W. Yiunzilcer ,'
Stre�t is ittc'ii.cated as a Cnllector st�reet on� the 7l'i�e►rd Conamounity �
a;
Plau �►nd, as such, requ3res a 60 Yoot minimum rig,ht-of-w�y. ;A
,:
�10 foa� r�ght�f-way now ex3sts �long this protion of S.�d. Hunziker ��
Street. ��
�i
};
St,e�;�f Re�ommenc�ation tl�
r•
rov�]. of �be applicants m3n�or :Land. psrtitioning �
S�� recommends aPP �
wi�h �he �'ollo�rtng c4ridi�tions: �'
�;
�
�k,� , �
�".. . _ .
i , . _ ; : .. . , .
, � , �
, ,_..:_... . , . _ . ,, , .-. _ . ,. . .
�''
�'±
�sS
+
� � � � � rt.. � �,��
�., w ?��
,,
�:
c
� {
�:
1. �he apP�i�t eledicate ten feet caf ac�.��.onal road ��<
� r�ght-oY-w�y alang �Yiat prc�t�on of �Y� a�plicant�s �;
', pr�p�r�y �►d,�acent S.W. tiunz3,k�r Street. �a3,d c'iedication �<
she�11. be completed prio� 'to issuance of tla� occupan.cy 3�`
}-;
permit for the proposed off�.ce build3ng. k!.
�:�
�',
;.;
�:
r,
�,:
t,,,
}5`;
. . ... . .f�,;.',.
I
('�
�'�1
N'%
�;�i
i:.
. . � � .. . . ;;�
E,.i
;�
,:;
!,�
,:
SI
�i
e3
a,�
ze
�: ��
?�
d`!
��f,',�I
�i
tF
�.•
�'
),,
j
�:
���
If
�,'
�'.
PaB� � - xx"����n Moore • Minor La�nd Partitioz�.ng �,
�:
� � �;
B;
4.:
�;
i�
�. �.
�
�a. .�