Loading...
Planning Commission Packet - 08/07/1973 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. � � � �., � �i����!! ' °���?l� ���r �'���a�l�N i; ,$��,9�F�° �G�'t�e�� � �l�l�ft?1�31� °(�g �,�`�� ��'�� e1��"a ��! ��°ffi��)�, � �,�C�`�a�n�� �°�C�]m� �.�� �o�d'a �`'���n �4r��a��� �°����.9 U�c���� �i"�63��J' e���6�.��11 �EIl�, �1�1d����,ffi� �L�1��fflC��� m °�8� �o�o �l9d�JL_14� ���'�.� °* bl):� �b�o . . . �• &YlA4Wlq L��Y/ �LJ15U_wl�.J3 . . ' . Ca O AD�.LL3��1 �!'$b2�� � .. . . �1• !£-.'��"�C�J V`'�9 11A�S' �{��'�'d6lCUJJ � . �'�" . �s�, ��'tl��.1X� �G�`l��ffi� ��' J��f �s �'�`�.3 �,.� ���.� ��`��� ��' �� ��� ���(� �o ��5�� �`'���r � "�,��sG (��1�� �+.�1 ��a�e ��c� l� �_°�� Q��a��� �I���c�c�� Qc��1`��.ffi�]�ce� ��� �t��J' �j�'(� u���,�� ' A ��,�1�$� ��j �°• �. �no F���,(d�� (�'t��a�?��J '� � (� �� �8���°�,�'���m �"�a� �p°�8 �`��� ��i�� ����.�'�a���, �s� (�m�s �m�c�r� (�¢���c��a �� .�_�� �P���. ���,��m�a��a ���d� �� �'�t� c��a���������ffi �� � ����,��'�.c� ��°� c����,��e °.�°� sa�To�jc�c�� ;����� �� l���sn��. �� i�.�l��� �°� 4�1� `� .�S'm� ��l"1�1t� �bUC�'�I���'3'lb $�1.�. �s`�i9 ���,9��`ly�lb�d�,�e .. . '� ����� ����,�an ��' '�� ��ac���/ �,s 'rt�a�rr�d. �,� �� �l���d�s�� c��'a�l,G�6 8b� '�� ��?���Ql °�aPC��l��e�'�����Il ��'�� c���c��2�EA�O. °.i� ���ae»�. ��x°���$ �°�'�'�6 ���� �°JI��K 1� �� �.�'ty °�� 1.��� 7L�y �a �� �9 �a ��9 °��� �stt� ��� S� �°i�r�,�s �s��;�m� � (���� ��ma�.���.��a �°��" �d�c��et����L��n ���s��c��a ��,��r����»�a� � �����r� � �' ' ,: . , : . . ,._ . .._ _ _ _.. .. , , .. ,: _ _.. . ....:� _ , _ ., ,r 4; � �� � � � � � � . i , 4 . �"_ i: �o ���,2� �'�'����r � '�LRI��`L`��,1���, ��(� �; 5 •� �ffi1��,�,�,�a�71, ���c� (�'� �,�j�°�� ��'����1,�4�1�� � ����������. ���� ���� �� ��7��� �, ; � ��p��s���,u� ��r ���s i�c���� �ro��� �'�� c�����,c��,��,c��m c��' c��ng��.�� � d��l�� �,�s �� ,� ���.����a!�1 �n�c� �ffi � �a��➢ ��a�� ���,�,� ;.. ������a��� ���c�. �� ����� �� �,�c��c�� ��6� �� ���� ��a��•� � � �'��� ���� �,� ���➢ �a�����m�� �� ���� �e��d�,��,��4 � ; �a����. ��e������ �.� ���c��a ���� ��a ��. �9 �� ��s �,�9 �n� ,; �� �� �[���°�� ���' �cc�c��m�ffi�a��3��� k i ;� ; 6. ��� ��r1�c� ��8�� 7. s���r���c�� � �����o�,��� ��� ����� ' � ; `�oA �arg,�,��,� �c�u���v���i �u�€��,c�s�� C � ������aeace� ����� �1��� �,�°c� 1�u��� �c�'��sU�sB �L�$ �G��s �,��C�'l�C� cSD14� 'l�� ��d�`ft��t�3'� ��R�C�F���C�`��C�L�1 �,��C�r�c�.1�°�71'{� �5S' a�7i o�n �'l�n�°� �.31C�J.01. n�e�o c�t°����� �'CC;��f ��$'C9�C�. �1t�T�''�°�,il� c�i''�th1�� �$�'�ct?)�n1.k�tRb`�i�1Y�5� �.� �� ���� Q�°��� ������ �om� ��������� ���� �� � ����� ������e ��� �� ���� ����� �� � ���� ���� �� ���y , ������� �� ����r ���������� a���� ���� ����������� �. s��a��a�r�s � ��� � ��������� �o� a��� � ��� ,, ����L��l°e 57[�N/� ►�e�e ��°�i��' ���g c��.,clJ�(�"C�,1�`�'s �a����� ��n �s����,� ��ac°���,�� ��' ]P��iau R+��� ���c. �- ��� ����������� �an�����.�� Ib�s��a����a� �1 �c���.c��a ; P�e 2 • &� ��dl� - ���� 7'a �9�� ` I l � _,..._-,.., ..� ., .� .. �.:: �..W..�,.... .. �.�.. _ ,,.._�. ._.a:�,. .��.� ,�..�.,�, : _ ��_.. .ww _ _ . .. ..._ ..,..� . �._,.,.. .... . .. ,...,�.. __�,_ w,. . + �"'�' �, . �*�,.: � � 9. ��� ����� � �3��' 9.� �a��.�� ������� �����.��: ����i �� W�i�� �� �� ���� �� ��c���,c� ��,��� � 9.� ��� ��� �����g ' �(4°�`��:�i#b°o �°E'"GNJ a�e�e �Y4_1�.'�'s�b �Qt�4� g.� ���.a�'��.� ��. a�nd. R�I�a�� ��`����o ��� �ak�d �� ���. �.� �'��°� �8c���ea..'�� � ����S��i ���a����� ��� �� k��;���'�� ���'��9 �� �'�c�� ��au'�� �� ���. ��a ����� �� �� � �������� ��� ���� ���� �� �.� ��,�°c�,� Am6�1 k���fl��`�� �A1d�RCt.l���t58p dL�� d3�EE O ��aE� �V l`N�WIti � 4 9 e'� ��'�� �l.°�dL,�lu.u.4/1'� a��,°�� '�'l�'i . . ��'����t ��.��'��.,� �� ��.�'��,1CA� ��,�� �.�. ��k� �i.i��y ��c�@�6 �i� � �$��'�y �i� ��1��d ��' ��8 �'$+���. �• �e��°i�°Y � , P�6e 3 � �� 11�e� - l���sit 7, �9°�'� _ _ . � . , �� � � _: _ .. , . ,, , . . , . ... _ _ ., <...:. . , �e; . �� � , ,;.. �� �.._: �... � �� �' �— -�1 G��f1'f�' � �V TIGAF�D PLANNING COmf�ISSIQN �; Regula� r'lee��i.ng � August `l, 19'13 ;' �< Twali�y J�tl High Srhool.� lect��rg �oom �'e 'i4650 S.Wa 97th Nvenue, Ti,c��;rd, Oregon i r: � � 1 . CALL T� ORdER �' Ao The mee�it7y �ds c�11.gd t;a nrder a� 7:4� P.�I. ' � i;:l �m ROLL CAL.L. � ,. A o P�essnt� Cor�m:iss.�.nnors Ba]„L, Bs�rkhurst, Ha�tman, ,` Le���s, Nic�1.i and Chairmar� LJhi��aker, �t pl.annir�g Ua.�ecfior, 1,1:i.nk 8rar�ks; Assooid�e !;I Planner, Di.rk Bol�n; Der�yck Da.ttman uf €:�I the Cit;y � s ���torney°s offiae. ��I 3o A�PROVAL OF' f�INUl'ES ��'I' '.�I Ao Th� min��tes �f the ai.�ly �i, 1973 Pls�nn.ing Commis�ioi� �?'�, ,� mee�ing were �.mended as fc�llows a �;i i 1 m Paga 5 co,icarning tl�e Aa�row Heating conditianal �� ��se y Ball clid n�t �eoommer�d appraval of the r�q�es�t b�.�� rathe� statac� he felt tha �ayuest was an ap�aro�riat�s one but under the iriterpre�a�.ion c�F �h� c�rdana�ce a� sts�teci by �he City Attorney �; he ca�1„d not reca�mbnd approvale E,, ;. 2o Pago 7 oor�ce�ning the Sahul.z conditir�nal use � �he 3rd condi��.on shr�uld st��e tlia� no accoss ��� �ill. be prGVided onto Ti�deman to inc].ude �ha �;; construction of drivewaygo � �'i H. Th� mi.nutes were a�pr��!ec� as amerided by unanfmous << vote �f �he Commfsca.on presenta 1`� ;i 4. DISCUSSTON PERTOD k' �; A. C;eorge �lar����1.1 c�f' �h� T�aala�i,M Dev�7,oPment Corp_ nx��tir�n requested the planhing Comm.issioh cons�ider� � ' probl.ems created for �heir development resul�t,ing fro�n � recent City A��arne� a.nterpretation of �ha � stree�s standarc�s sectic+n af' the Subdivision qrdi.nanae. He �+�a�ed that he wag ��qua��ing �he planna,ng Comm�.�sa.an � aroept an interpse�ation �f the Subd�.vision Ordinan�e � � contsary to �hat affered by '�he C�.�y Attorn�y °a offioe. ; � ; ,; � - _ _._.__.. _ � _. . .� _.. ,. . «�.,..., , . , r._ _ . � �. . � _ r �.., � . �_., f�rs f�a�shal.l. p��sen�ec� a his�ory �f �he Summerfi.e.ld development �o date� beginning with its original approval by Washingtr�n Gounty as a Flanned Residential Developmento 7he p�oject was then annexed to the City of `i°.�gard �nd tP�� Ca.ty initiated a change of zoning to the City °s P1.anned Deve,lopment Di,str. �ct. �Ir. I�ar�ha:11 po�.nted n�t that accord.�ng to his interpx�etati.on of tho Subdiviss.on Ord.inance, the or�iinance stat�s that la�cge scale developments can ' bP grantPd except�.ons f�or� the subd.�v�.sion code and th�t the Ci�y �s �pF�ro��al. c�f the P-D zone was also an acceptance oP the stre��� on the sukamitt�d plan not " confo:�m.�.ng to the C�.ty° s m.�nimum street standa�ds in the Subd�vi�ion O�din�ncem He concl.uderl by requesting the P�.�nning Cor�mission to inte,cpret �he Subdivi��.on Ord�.nance as gr�nt.i,r�g exception fo� large scale devel- opr�ents ove� �nd �ga.�n�t �he recommPndation ofi th� City Atto�n�y who sta�ed that a var�.ance m��st be sought for such deviations f'com the required standards. B. Derryck Dittman spoke fo� the City ' s Attornc�yes office sta�ing that the parag��.ph �.n the subdiv�.sion code ref��r�_ng to exception is intended to include .large sca.le deve�.op�nents �� P1ig,i.ble �`or a varianc� acco�d- � ing t� the standards anr� proredures �rrovided in the va�iance sec��.�on of �he subdi��ision o�dinanoe, Ce At 8000 �he d.i.scussion w�s te�minated a�n order to b�gi.n •Lhe publ.ic hear.�.ng �cheduled for f,his ta.mee Da Geor.ge (�ar.shall was a�ivised that;, �.f he �iesired, he could cont.inu� discus�a.on on this matter w.i�h the pl�nning C�mmission af�sr the Public Hearings were �UP..L�s E. Aftex� alosing •the public hear�.ng at 9:C1Q, thP discussion was resumed conside�ing the Summerf.ield matter. Bi11 �Ic�lonagle, of Harris and f�cl�onagle Engineer�, spoke for Summerfield statinr� that he did not agree with the City Attorney ' s �.nterpret�tion of thi.s sect�.on of the Siabdi,vision O�di�n�nce and urged the Planning Commission to continue to in�erpret the ordinance as they had in the past. F. George Lewis s��ted tha� according to his reading of the subdivisi�n ordin�.nce i.t did grant excepta.ons to large scale develnpments and he interpx�ets Summerfield as being what the ordin�nce descri.bes as a large sc�le developmen'tm He ther�fore felt that, in this case, the City A�torney a s opa.n,fc�n was inappropriate. � Go (�r. D.ittman �nce �g�ih explained the Czty A�tosney � s op�.ninn and concluded by stating tha� a l�rge soale development, as any other develapment, mu�t be graMt.e�l � . • „ ��•.• Page 2 - PC Ag�hda �- August 7, 1973 ., �..�., _ _ • �...� � .: ,.,. �I.� a var7.ance �.n orda�c �o c�PV�.at� f�om the standards of the sub�livision orc�:�r�ance. H. Ball stated that he had tr�_ed to rea�J the subdivzsi.on ordinance in nrder to co e ou�t it t . �e w h he �.ntPr r�t p at�.on as Summerfield hdd sugges�ed a.nd found it not possi.bl.e ta o � d s e He the�ef"ore stateci that he agseed with the , City Attorney' � pr�s�.•�.i,c�n on tha.s matter anci that the Summerfiel.d �o "ect shoulci be re uired tr� obtain a J r � va�iance where �he standa�ds havP been devia�ed frorrs. I o George L_�wis mr�v�ci �o cons�.dex t}�e p.reliminary plat fc�� Summe�f�,e�d 11 at �he next Pleni��.ng Comma.ssa.on hea�ing on A�igust 21 , �973m Tha motion wa� put to a vc�te and passed ur�ar��,mot�s.ly a 5. PUBLIC HEA�iTNG � Zane Ch�.hge 4. 1 Zone Chang� ZC 4�73 (F�rmers Ir�su�ance) (Continued fror� �e�l.y �3rd meeting) A rec�uest� by F', �:o G o Hold�.ng Company to changc� � �one cl.ass,ification f`rom R-7, Single Fami.ly Res.identi,al and C-3, Gen�aral Cc�mmerc.ial, to P�D, P.lanned Development, allows.ng the �u�ture c�n��ructior� of a motel-office park � camp'lexm The subject property is bounded by Highway 217 and T-5 on the so�the�st a.nd west, x�espect,ively. The western portion of the property is bordered by the Lamb- Wesi:on complex and the proposed Travc�rs-Johnston office � development� �'he p�cop�s�l comprises 27p76 acres (7ax ! �1ap 2S1 "ID, Tax �.ats 1CJ0, 200, 300, �t70, 500, 50'1 , 701 ` and 1100) � � � A. Staff F.i.ndings 1 . The staff preser�ted a list of n.ir�e f.�nd.ings relative �o th?s zone change request!m In summary, these findings f'ound the .r,Pquest in conformance with the Comprehensive P1an and �he materials submitted to the Pl.anning Commis�.ion werA c�nsa.dered complete and judged �to const.itute a psel�.minary development plan and prog��m as descr�ibed 18. 56. 020 of the Ti,garci �lunicipal Code., 8. 1"estimony and Cco�s Examination 1 . Proponents A. S�eak�.ng fo� th� appl.�.cant w�s Bud D�i,ngdulph �f B�oome, �elig ahd Ox�ingdulph Architects, He presented a document to the Planning Commission, an addendum � to the pr.evious ma�erial which had been submi�te.d at �he prev:�ous publ.ic heas�:t�g� This add�ndum included an a1�e.rnat�..ve tn �he motor hotel proposal �o be included on the subject site� He sta�ed tha�t F�rmers , , , . Page 3 - PC Aqenda - Augus� l, 1973 _ .., . �_ _. .._..,_ _�_.._.___� . __ . ,_.:.....,._�, ... . .,:. _, _ , ..__. . .. . . _ . . _..,_.. . _... .. �: � � �'� �, a ,;��. �� � � ��� � � would 1.ike to ha.ve �hs alterna�e approval for �'; a 100, 000 square fa�at office t�u.�1�1�.ng on the motos-•�ho�tel s.��te �.f' the motor h��el, c�ue �o thP time lage .�nvo�ved ,i.n �.ocating on th:is site, chooses anothe� locatian. The addendum i.ncluderJ 4; a market an�ly5is f�r the l�ca�a�on of th� motor- �y hotel i.n this por�s.nn ef Portland I�etrc�po�.itan �� a�eao "ft�iP fi�m of Ketnmo�s-�W.�1son Tnco;r.prar.a�ed ;�; conductecl the market an�l.ys.�.s and as a .resul� of tF�e�.r ��udy concluded t;h�t �ha.s �ras a des;i�able a lncati.on, f�om an econom.�c standpo.int, for a ,:� motor�hote.� facility. �iro O�,ingdul�h cont,inued #i by saying that he understood th�f at this t�.me ��� •�he Pl.anr�.�nq Comrn,iss.�,rrb w�� con�ic�er,ing �the pro jec•t �; f`o� prel,zmi.n�a:y cr�nce�t ��pp�o��al �nd that the next �. �tep is �to �ubmi.t morE� de����.ied deve].opment s info�mat;.ion. He concluded �y statzny that this a! .�.nforma�.�.on w�.11 be su;�p'Lied and hopeful.ly approved ,' by the plann.�.ng Cor�ma..s�;x.on and, �.f the sewer �: si�uati.on does nnt preven� cnnstruc�ion of' the � motor-hotel, �.� cr�ul.d beg�.n wit;hin 1973e `'' .��t ker uestioned tho alternate �an fc�:r an � B. Wh a q p � office site on the motc�r-�hotel s.�te. The addet�rJum submi�ted states that f,has�e w:il1 t�P no changP in � �' densi.t�y of site use, but daes add 3n addit�onal 12U pa�k.ing spacesG Chai�R�an Wh.i.tt�ker questinn�d whether. o� nut, in fact, th.is woul.d i.mply a change a.n den�i�y in sitP use a.nd also questianed the additior�al. pa�king spaces and their impact„ ��, �Ird Oi�..ngdu�.�h rQSponc{e�i that the parking requ�.re- f; ments fo� a ^�ot���hote� a�e d.�.ffe�ent than those � for an office buxld.�nge '1"herefoze �he o�fice ''' buil.c�ing tdill cover. less si�e area than the mato�-� � hotelo Ca Hartman a�ked if the motel wauld not create diff'erent � t�affic peaks th�n the o�fice and therefore spread s the traff.a.c aut ove� d�.fferent times. I�r. Oringdulph � sa�.d yes, this wauld be the reswlt. p. Ball st�ted that the problem with the p�oposal is i. that is must he carried ou� in conformance w.�th the zoning ordinance, t:he �roblem being that the ordinance requires definite development plans to be submitted bePore the zone can be changede Ball also stated FIG company ,is cons�.dex�ing a phase development which makos it .impract�,ica.� ta st,abmit de�tazl,ed plans for the entire project at �th�.s timee He stated that befor�+ the zone can be changed the P1ann.�ng Commissinn must �' have a def�.n�te and spec,ific proposal for the enti,re devel.opment. Page 4 - PC Agenda - A�agust 7, 1973 � . _. _ � t ` � �-° He then que�tionerJ I��. Or�.ngdulph .if his intention was to seek approv�l fo� each ir�dividual. parcel, and the�eFore ind.i.vidual �one changes, o,r app,roval for the ent,ire p��c�l at one time� �Ir. Ox�ingdulph responded that yea �hey we�e seeking �pprov�l for the eni�i�e parcel and the �.ntc�nt.�on was to subrnit a maste� plan f°o:� developmen�:. c�f' the prc��ject based upon the concept beir�g presented t� the P1ann.�ng Commiss��onm Ivla�e Ba1.1 stated that th�.s i waul.d be a�propriate if•th� infortna�a.c�n �iere �.n sufficien�t d��a�.�. and �nswered the requ�.remen-�s fnr -�he f�.n�l dev�la�ment pla.� as set down �.n the zoning c�rd.i.nanceF Eo Ii�ving Lazson a x�esi.dont of the area, askr�d hor,� traffic would get to the motel sat� fr�m int�rstate 5. �1r. U�ingdulph ��,�d that �intil E�3th' �t�eet were c�nstruc�,ed 66�th S�tre�t wo�sl.d be used as wetii a5 Hampton to 2'I7� F� Beth B:�shap a res:i�len� of �;he x�ol.ling hi,1.l �ub� division vo the east said that she livps on � Uarr�s Street �nd t�ere are many people t;h��� �ei� confused wf�:i,le da�.i.va,ng to the Far�ners Site and pass ��hrough her ne:�ghbo�h�od� She tFiu�efore stated ', �;,_ tha� this �it;e �,s nat �s �.ccessible as Farmers �.s s�ating it ism Staff Recommendat�on A� '(hP st�.ff r�c�r�n��ns�ed a�proval of the �a�•ela.minary devel��ment plan and prc�gramm �, i� Commission Discussion and Action r l� t A. Hartman expressed conce�n ov�r the traffic c�.rc- ulat.ion problems in thc� area. Ne s�;at�d that the � so7.ution to many of thc�se px�ablems is k�eyond the � contro'1 of the applicant;, the solution ' s resting 'f' with �he governm�ntal� jurisdzcations involved. � € He vieweci the prr�posal to be a favorable one and j felt the traffic c.�rculation pr�blems in th� area f: shoul.d n�t be ci,•Led as a �eason for denying the �; re ues�. fi q {,< B. George Lewis stated th�t the Farmers Insu�ance �' Group shoulcl be complementP�1 for the time and effort ,involued i� �.il�nna.ng the proposed project � and moved tha prel.s.m:ina:cy concept plan be approved '� according tc� the st�ff r�comrnend�ti.ons and finda,ngs. �` Hartman seconded the motions � � �� ; " Fage 5 ,.- PC Agenda - August l, 1973 ■�, . _. , �, �_ �,r t C o Bal,l a.y:ceed w.i�h L�wis s comments and s�tated that �he P=D a.s a good method �f con�tro.L�ing this project over a long �eriod of timee Nowever, he poin•�ed otJt that his ���e for apProval of the concep� does not .�ricl,ud� the moto'r-hotel sitP. b. 1"he m�ti.on ��s p�at to a vate and passed us�an.imr�u�l.y. 5. Pl18LI'C HEARTNG - Cnnd.itic�nal. Use 5. 1 Cond�.ti:onal. Us� ClJ 13�-�73 (Arrow Neat�.ng Co. ) (Continued from �u.ly 3rd heariny) 1 - An app3i.ca�ion by Arro� Heat.ing Company fo� consid- eration af duplex dwell.�.ng un�.ts as a conditi:c�n�l use in an R-�"15, S�.ng1e Family R�asidentia7. zane� Th�.s proPasal is located nor�h of` Wal.nut Street and 40D I fec�t east of 12.1st, adjacent the Brookway Subdivi.sione ; �°he proposal compr.�ses 2.. 5 acres. (`fax rlap 2S1 3BB, � Tax Lots 100, 2.00 and 300) ' � Ae Tnte�im S•�af� Recommenda�i.on� � � �` 1 . Wink B�ook� ,i.nf�xmPd the Commissioners that � •the �pplicant has requested tabl.ing th.is .item to the August 21 , '1973 h�aring. He therefo�e reaomme�ded �h�t the request be tabled unti.l the ' August 2'I , 1973 heari.ng. B, Comm�.ssion Discussion �nd Action 1 . Ba�khux•st move�i to table the request to the August 21 , 1973 h7earingo Hartmart seconded the motion and i� passed by a unani,mous vote. 6. CLOSED P`U8L7C HEARING - The pub].ic hea�ing was c�.osed at 9e[70 Ps�le Ze SUBDIUZSIONS - Prel..iminary P1at Approval, 7a1 Englewood (Gommonw�al�h Prnpez�ties� (Continued from Ju1y 3rd, hearing) Location: 100 acres located on the southeast intersection quarJrant of SeW. 121st and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. A. Interim S�taff Reer�mm�ndations � 1e Brooks 5�a�ed that the applic�n� wishes to t�ble �he �.�' request ,unti.l the eonflicts between �ha Zaning � Subd,ivisions O�dinances a�e resolved. The staff �thezef`Q�e r�commended tab�.ing this item until these � Page 6 - PC Agenda - Augus� 7, 1973 �t..., ... . ;,> � � ,. � � � ; �� ,���. ,:�, � � —. , �a, ._ ... _,. . ::.a , , �.- �.. �v ronf''l..�c�s were resolved or unta.l the applicant wishes �o xesut�mit his psoposal mee�ing the City ' s subd,�.v�.s�on st�ndardsN B. Comm.��sion U.�.scu���.on �nd Ac�ion "I . L.e�i.s moved to aY:1.ow subm.9.ttal af �he subdiv�.sion prel,ima.nary �lat f°o� the Augus� 2'I , 'I 973 hea�.ing. Ba�.1 seconded and �he motion passed by un�himous votea 7.2 Lake Terrace (A:crow Heat�.ng Con ) (L'ontinued f�otn Ju�.y 3�d hearing) Locationo Narth of Walnut Street and 400 feet east cf 121s�, adjacent the Brookway Subdivisi�n. A. I:n�e�im Staf'f Recomrrenda�ic�ns 1e Tr� accardance wi±h the conditional use for this prnperty the s�taff recommended �abl�,ng to •the Aug�st 21 , 1973 hearyng. Bm Comm.��s.�on D�.scussiara and Ac�ion �i ' �; 1 . Har�man moved �nd Ba'll seconded to tabl.e the request to the A��g�st �1 , 1973 he�r�.ng. The mot.ion passed I�y unan.�mau� �at��o �I 8� SUBUIUTSIONS - �IINOR LAND PARI'T�ONING I 8. 1 Irvington-�(��ore ; Lacatinn � 82.05 SaWe Hun�iker Raad, I ad��cen� Hur�xiker on westerly extremity of 7rv�.ngtan�-�loore site. i . A. StaPf Recommendation I 1 . Staff recommended app�oval af the minor land pa�titianing With the condition that 10 feet of additional. r.ight�of-w�y be dedicated along tha�. partion oP the applicarit' s property adjacent ' tn southwes� Hunziker 5�reet. This teh feet is to include �the en�:ire pz�operty ownPd by the �pplicant and not mer�:ly that pres�ntly being part.itioned. ' Said dedicata.an �hal1 be cotnpleted prior to issuance of �tn oc�up�.ncy permit for the propqs�d oPfice builcling on �the par�it�.oned site. � 8. Commission Da,scuss�.on and Action �I � i 1 . Hartman mc�vet� t;o appr�ve the m:inor l,and �a�ti�tianing with the staff conditions and wi.t;h the addit.�onal , , , Page ? - PC Agenda - August 7, `1973 ��.: .._.._,, ._.. _.. ... . _ , . . .. ....�.,....._._. ., _. , ,_. ;,. , _ .., ... t ,..:,, ,:.,.�..�. ,_...,. ........,. .: ,�...,......_.. . . _ _ _,... , , . . ,. . . . . .,.:. :.... .. . _ _ . .:.., _-, . . ,1 ,. Sk: � ;i . . . . . ,.� . . �� . . . � � . . . . � �:.. �, ��.. � . . . _ . . . �, cond�.ta.on that the en�.ire �rnpe,cty �wned by the applicar�� be brough� a.nto conformance w�.th the � City� s si.te devel.opment p1�n r.eview �rdinancee Barkhuz�st seconded and the tno�i.on passed by a ;; unanitnous vo�e. �"' 9. SITE DEUEL.OPP'IENT PLAN REIIrEW `` i'. I 9. 1 SU[I�.QW Apartments �', 1 Locatinnm No�;•th �f W�1nut and 450 e�s� �f � Pacific Highway �'`�� A. S��ff Recommend3�t;ions i; r.: 1 . `fhe staff recomm�nded ap��oua�. c�f �he si.te p,lan �' �s suk�mi�te�. i i:, ;� B. Commission D.�.scussic,n and Action ± � � � �,: ,, 1 o L.��is moved to app�c�ve �he subm�.�ted p�.an �nd E�' Hartrnan secanded. �'he r�otion pa�sed by unan�.mous f�! vof,em ` �, 9.2 Puget Die Cas��ing �! Locationo 7440 SuW� Bnnita Road A. Staff Reco€�r�pndat:�or� - 1 e 7'he staff r�co�triended d.��approva.l of the site and �,;. landsca zng lan a.s subml.tted, T'hp staff �u ested �:; P P 99 a . �„ that the a 1'icant resubm�.t new lans ro�atin P P P 9 �' to the standards and olicies set o t i p f r h n the F, Tigard Community plan and the Sit� Develc�pment (' pl�n revie4i sec�ion of the Zaning Ord�nance. �' �'� :, Bo Commiss.ian Discussa.on and Acti,an t , 1 . Hartman maued to disapprove the pl.an on the grounds that it is not suffi.cient to meet the requirsments of the Sa�e D�velopment Plan review ordinance. _ Barkhurst sPCOnded and motion passed four to one � with Nicoli dissenting. 9. 3 Columbia Hardwood and (�aulding Loca�ion� 12700 S.Wm Ha11. 81,vd. A. Staff Findings �` Tfie staff finds �he �ppl.ican�' s proposal is similar to the Puge� Die Ca��ing case, relating to paving for Page 8 - PC Agenda - Augus� 7, 1973 ..�w _ __ . _. . . _:. , _ , ,,. . .: ., ... ,_ .. .... .._.. ,�._...��;�� . ,. . : . .� �;, _ � . _ �:, .,,.. ��..;,. � _ :; . . , � .,.. ,. ... _ ..,,... � `; � � �T ��'' parking wi�thin a required 20 foot fi'ront yard .Landscaped ��cea. T'he staff fi:�nds a cnm�.rom�.se sol,�iti.on is appropr.ia�e, thus thP applicant has �►�r�posed a G�� foot l.andscape� area ��jacent t�he r:ight�>�nf"�way on SoWo Flall Blvd. plus 1.anciscapa.ng wi•t�h:�,n the exis�ing park.�ng aream The staff f�nds ��hi� acceptable �f add:�t:�ona1. 1.ar�dscaping :�s prr�vided un the inte�ior af the parking are�� The staff finds �the 1.a�dscaping an the interior of the .l.o� i.nac�equate, and nc�� meeting the ,intent; of � the Ti,ga�rJ �lun�.cipal. Ceaded 7'he s��f� �'�nds adcliti�nal planting shoul.d be �equ�.red as �'o.lZows: � . P1.ant.�ng a�eas ir� t�hP p�rking lo� shown c�ri the submi��ed p1.an sho�l.d be er�l:arged to al�Dw planting �.n a1:1 the sp�:ce r�ot; cur�en�l.y u�i1.�.,z�d by �u��' s for. p��k.�,ngd ; 2. pl.anting should ocau� on {:he southerl,y porta.on of the ex�.st;:�rag asphalt area south of �h� �ark�.r�g 1.ot and ad,��.cent th� raa..lroad righ'r-of-way. This � lantin should .�,nclude lan materials that w�..1,1 P• 9 p F ui.�din mass to � e arker� au'to s �.nd b �, screPn h p 9 the no�th �nd e�,�i:, 3. Pl.an�ing �h�uld occu� along the �ace of the existing bu.ild:�ny to fusther vi��ally sof��n the ma.s� of thi.� hu,i.�cling fram SmW. Ha11. 81,vd. 4. Landscaping sl�c�u�.c� occur a.n two pa�al.le.L and � oppos.i�e parkir�c� s��ll� oP the harthesn tier � of par4�inq to mee�Eir�g �the T.iga.rd I�unicipal fi Code requ�.rem�nt af one tree ?0 feet on center � each way. ( 5. 7he s�taff f'ir�ds al'J.. pl.ant�.ng areas shoulci bo protect:ed by curb:ir�g where necessary �nd water provided to �hese areas or other such assurance tha�t plan•t rn��te�,i�.�.s will suxuive periads of drough�t. 1"he ��aff f�,nrJs these �recautions necessary to ensure maa.ntenance of the 1ai�dscap�ng. B. S'taff Recommendat�.ons 1 . The staff �PCOm�enrJ� approval of the appl.�cant' � 1.andscape p,lan wa.th '�he cond�.t�.on tha{; the� revis�d plan b� submi�ted f`car s�aff appraval correct;ing the def'�.cienciss covered in the stafi f �� f�:ndings. Page 9 - PC Agenda � Augus� 7y 191� . . � . � - . ... ;: ...;..r .. . <. , .;z i •,,�. �:..... . .�t .�. , � .-_, �.._..a��. .� _�..:��. ,.... :a �._,,.,_..�. �„ ;_ � �; , ; . ., ,.. . . .__; ,._.a.,.. _, .._ . , .. .. . . , � t- �_ �.� .' . . � �°�`` Ce Cc�tnmi,ssa.on Ga,�r.us�i�n ar�d Act:i�n 1 . Law.%.� �tr�v�d ��;a ap�roup the p1.a� including the s�aff a°ecommended conc�.xt�,ons and Ba�skhurst second��iM 1`I`�e tt�o�t.�os� ���sed by a unanimous voteo 7.4 5�mbo d s (�Pstat,�rant Loc��a.on� ;r�u�;he�s�r s�.r�e of F�acific Highw�y , 45Q fee� sc�u�h of Hal�. Blvd. between the I_,on� Q�k R�stau�an� and Tigard (�1c�t�s�s A. 5�aff Re�c�mmendaL-�c�n 1 a 1°he sta�'f recc�m�s�nd��l app�r�v�l c�f the appl.icant e s sit� and lar�c��c.�.�P �S1�np �°he conr�it;ion tha� a re��a�sed s.i�e pl.an k�e submittPd r�li.mina�ting one � existing trpe and �tx°aightening �he curve on the � dra.vew�y coranec��:�ng �u SoWa Ha11, B1vda � Bo Comm�.ssion Discu�s�.on �r�r� Ar�ipn � 1 , Ba.�khu�;��L moued t�a a�pz�ve the submittPd �1.�n and �, de.l.eta.ng t;he staf'f' recomt��nded conda.tione Lewis �;: seconded �nd the mot:%or� p���ed by unanimc�us votee 7. 5 Ci�cle A W P��duc�s Locat�.on� '�3885 5oW� 72nd Avenue Am S�ta�f F`�.nda.r�gs � 1 e The si�aff po�.►-���d out �ha� ths submitted plan � r�aes not mae� •the setback �equirements in th� � �oning ord.inancpo Pl,ac.i.r�g the buil.d.�ng to WYthi,n 12. feet af the prope�ty where 20 feet is required. � , Staf P Recommenda�ta.ons A. The staff recornm�nds a(��r�v�1 of the siabmi.tted site and landscape p�.�n w�.th the condition that a revised t pl�.n be suk�m�.tted �eflecting the required 20 foot � sideya�d fns th� m-�� zone� � Bo Hartman m�ved �o appruve �he submitted plan with th� �� staf f �ecommended canc�:��i.c�ns, l_ewis secor�ded. The motion passed by unanimr�us vnte. 9. 6 General. Te].�phone Pa:r.k.ing L.bt � Locata,onm Di.zec�;ly behind ex�,sting Ca.ty Ha11 parking 10�, access on �urnham 5tg 34C1 east of I�ain St. Page 10 - F�C Agenda � August '7, '1973 � ....:;: . . _ �. _ _ .. .. ._ ._....� . . . ,_ ... _..._.,.... , , �. �`. 4 �:�: A. Staff Recommendats.o�s � 1 � 5taff' r,ecanamp�de�1 •�h�t; ac�.ien on th�o �ub�a.���ted I,, plan b� tabled untyl � r.evised plan may be ' subm�.ttacl c�rt�`a��a�nq to the standaids of th� Sa.t� Dev�:l.rapment Plan review seci�.ion of the ' o�dinancea Ba�kh�.f�s�t moved and N�.coli ssconded tc� table cor�sider.�at.�,nn to tt�e Aug��st L"I , 1973 I hea�ing. 9v7 7iga��f Wa�e� D.i.s��.�.c� A� The sta�f �ecnmc�en��rJ that the Ta.gard Water U�.s�r,ict bQ �equi.rer� tc� st��ma.t a S.i.t� Dev�l.op��ent p.�an� Bo Cornmission Discuss.ic�n and Ac�ians 1 . Har�trian rnn�ed �n ��blP co�as�.dQ�ati.oh to the August 21 , 'I y73 hearing �n a1..�ow 'ch� t�.a�;er dis�rict to �ubt�i� a ��te deve�.Qpment plan. Lewis s�conded and the n�o�ion was p�ssed Wa.th N,ico1,.� and Barkhurs� abstaa.r�ing� 908 Lamb-Westc�n `��-"' Ao S�taff Recornn��r�d�tzon � 1 . The �taff ��cor��nand�d �pproval r�F the revisACJ landscape �S1.an �as ar� amendment to �the l�ndscape p1.an �.pr�roved by f�he P1�,nning Cr�mm.�.ssion on J�a1y 17, 19730 e. Commission Di,sc�assian �nd Actian 1 . Ba�khu�st moued �nd Ha�tm�n seconded to app�oue the �mended plan as �ubm�.ttedo The motion passed unanimously wa.tFa Whi�t�ker abstain.ing. 10. MISCEI..I_ANEOUS 10. 1 Culv�r Construct�,on Company A. Staff Find�.ngs 10 The staff described thr� applicant° s request to gain the Planninq Commission's suppart in acqu,�.r�.ng 10 fe�� from the 5t�te Highway De�a��meht � along an existirag 2� foot easetneht to all,aw const- I �uction af a mntel �djacent the Highway 21? ' Pacifa.c Highway in�erchangee , � B. S��aff Recammenda��,on 1 . 7'he staff �gcommended �hat �he 'F.Co no� support Page 11 - PC Agend� � A�agust 7, 1973 �.. .: _ �. _ . ,: . . .. � : . �. ... . . . ., . . ---em-,�.--�.+�.� . .. . . � ... . .. . . . .. . .. � ...... . .. . . , . . .... ,..4... , .. . ... .. . . .... ....a � . .. . .�..� .. ..... .�...,A t v. . _ ':wt.�' , . . . �M � �. � . .. . �, . . .. . �. . . . . �., - � . �� .. � . �uy'n�.: . .. . . . . . . . ' .. . . the appl�,car�t° s �.�equest t�o the State. C� Commission b.�.scussion �nd Aeti�n< 'I o A�'ter d�.scussing �he rPqwest �.t Was agreed that the R�anning Commission wc�uld nnt aid i�he applicant �n hi.s effoxts to abtain an �dditional ea�er�ent from the State Highway Depa�tment, @ 11 . AUJOURN�IEN7 � � � � � � ��, y' �q 4 �r I' � � � � C � � � 1 1 ( �:,�. . . . � . � . . .. � PagE 12 - I�C Agenda - Augtast 7, 997� , . , ........._.._�^..�;.�... _ � � � �r- ��� ,��_��� =��� �;� ��i � ��; '� � 3 . ' � TICoARD PL�IM1�iING COI�R+�Q�I4.N , St�a!! R�gnrt August 7, 1�73 Cor��inued trnm July 17, 1973) Ag�ncle� It,e�o i AC 3-73 � , ; � Zone c�e,nge � � For propexty iocat,ed betMSen Igtersta�te 5 egd Hi�Y 217, ; in t� Ti�rd Tri.angle, aad baundea on the north by ve►c�ted '' Irvtng Street�, tma Lamb �leston e�mplex and, the proposed '� Lincalrx Propertiee olYice c�o�aPlex (�e►x l�p 231 1D, 'lb►x Lots lpp.a 2�, 3pQ, 1►p0, 5pp, �Ol, 70T attid 1100)` ,. ; ��lioent F.I.G. �io].diag Oompa�Y pgplie�nt"� Eie� ; : � ;; ; �� pgpraval 04' e ch�a�e 3n zoae cla�siflc�tlon rrom R•7, �� � single Fam��y Residenti,e►►]. to C-3, i�en�ra►1 Ouimeraiwl ta �, � P�U, Flanned Davelopm�nt. � �� A 11 c�ant°s P sa1 � _�. To divic�e "the s1t� into four se�nea�s o! Srom 2 to 5 �c�s. ; �ivisioning three se�sen�a �o lde d�evalaysed i�n office �celated � use 1n 2 to 4 story buildinga vith �► mnxi�uaa of 170,OUO sq. '� ft. of building �rd e fourth sega�ent t,o be davaloped iato a '� 150 wnit motor hptel vith reLtesi supportive lacilities � (resta�ursnts, ioeeti:ng rooma, etc.)" quated 4ia� page 12 of s; applicant's propoeal• Tl�e aPplic�at `rill aubmit a revi$ed � concept shor+i.n$ oi=lce snd rel�'ted supportive facilitias � on t2� proposed motel sita. This he�s b�reu d�ona ta provide }, an sl�ea�nste conoeptw►1 use i! a motel inv�estor ceuuiot be tound. •n � to locete on thi:s sits. I �� Revised St�►ft Findin6s l. The epplieent hsa sub�itted s preli;minary c�e�►�slopm�ent �,,. plsn and progran to tbe pLnning Co�misaion tor sn ;approval, � in principel of their proposal• According to Chspter ,; i8.56.oao (b:) (c) (a) ,►na� (e) oi �cbe Ti�.ra t�r.►�.ci� coa�e. ` , .. . , � ��.� :��� . ..��� .� -= . . _ , . . . ... ._ . . � � � ... . . . ... . . . . ,.'., ...,.,3 ,� ' . � . � � . � ) � Xp -^ . f. �'' '��. �� Tl�e P1�unniaa ao�iesion sl�all�-lntoxtslly revin► the °� � � ' preli�nicr�ry d�ev!elop�usu� p�lsn wd �tr� �d toay aat t to gra�� preliminwry appro'v�]., ap�x'owe1. ltith racoa�ttixl+sd t � modifications or den�sl. Sua� �et�on sh�ll be bssed upon tho aamprebensive p].an, t�he ats►nd�rds of this titl� and other reg�].stions snd t�he euita►bility o! the propos�d developmeat i�a relation to the cl�ra�ct�r o! tl�e ar�a. i�pproval in principl.� o� the prellninary cUv�elopment pL�n and program sl�11 bs limited to t7ns preli.minary acceptnbility of �he lacxd us�s propoaed and tbeir inter•rslationshlps u�d s2�11 not be conatrued �o endorse pr�cige locatir�a o! use,s nor enginaering teasibl3:it�r. Ttse Planning Gbmmis�ion trr�y� rsquire tha development of otl�r inYormation the►n tlost speci�ied in Sec'tion ].6056.030 to b� submitted with tbe getye�'al d�velop�oea►t . p].an a�d pro�e►m. The Ple�nning Comoniss3an �he�l]. review a� msy recommend exp�afon, additions or mociiticat�,ona in the guslifice�tiana of the propc►eed design team !or the pxAepwratiaci of th�e general plan eud progran. The Plnnr�ing Commission ahe►11 determine the extent ot any ' add.itiansl mo�rket analysis to be ix�cluded ia the ger�ml develo�ment plan and progrt►m. ��,,. 2. 'rhe ste�ff finds the appliceuxt's submissions ara cc�mpleta end constitute a prtlimixie►ry derrelopmen� pL�a and progrem as described 1$.56.020 of the Tf��rd Municipal Code, ( 3. The sub,ject site is desi�oated "It�s�.d,ential-Can�aercia�." on � ' the 'Pig�rd Community P1sn. According tp tla�e t.ext ot' this ,�lari, "this cstegory is interu3,ed. to accomoc�sdte higher-d�asity dwe.L�ir�g structures, includ.ing, higk►-x�ise agartments, ��oobina�d r+ith a rsnge of co�patible office ana business u�es. Jln agreeable ersarigement o! 'mi�osd laxd uas' in these �re�as can best 'be achieved if Lr�e tracts are dev�lopecl es 'planned units"' . The Ti�e►rd Commtuiity Plan contixiues, sta�ing "t.hese aress (i.e. resid�entie.l-oomcoercial) ere intended to have an 'urban quslity� ,aot unlike tbe redeveloped eection� ' of dorrntoxn Port,],and� Hfgh-rise and lovr-xise sp�rtments, and service establishmeats, xi],1 combine to crs�te an urban ercvironm�nt cl�ractert�ed by diversity �ctivity end a�menity. � The stsPf Pinds ti�at the prelimiz�ary development plan and program� as submitted, contorme to the Ob,�ectives ot the Ti�srd Commun�t�r Plaua. � Pe�ge 2- Stalt Report - 2C 4-73 - ;�uguat 7, 1973 � , ., �; . ;:� ,�.�:::, ,. c�:w•� ,�„w .;;: .a w�. .,:�,,.;.:.r�.�. ,w,_..: ��_ ,x�.. �t.. z:�,�r {\ Y �' ;�. . , 4. '�h�a atsf! linds tY�e pr��i�►ry al�w]�a�en� �L►n e�a�d pro�n►a� '_ � �o be 3n contmrroanae vit►h ths unaatopt�d Ti�'ad '1'ri�n8ls � Developrxnt Plan, etib�I.yt.� �l�s laeid i�ses �d d�tvelqymaxet - preir►ciplea �et lorth �.n the Trisngle P],an. 5. Th�e ste�fY tinds, tt�st basacl upon conversstions with tlx �PP�icant snd their ��e�at, th� applicant agr+ees to meet th� steucie►rde titl� 18 �d..otriar rag�ilati�ong embodied in th� Ti�ard Municipsl Gotle as relates tha epplicanx's proposed. de�relapment ia Planc�ed Dev�elopmer�t Distr�cts. 6. TY�e ste►ff finds the prelini�e►ry d�evelopafeat p],an and pro� 'to be competible with t2a�e �ui.st�.n� ct�racter aY th�e aree. '1"�e I-5 Preerre,y amd. �►vex�ton-+Ti�uurd E�ress`+m►y roY°m t�+�o aid�s of the site, rith tkre I�►nb-Weston and propossd I.inaolr► . � Properties office comple�oea borde�ring the northarn portion j of the site. These ad�aceat uses sre similar and ao�pstible . � vith the proposed dev�elopment. i 7. Ti�e �.I.G. Holding CompanY bas desig�nated the Architectuasl Fi� of Broome, 3elig e�nd Oringdulph ss its "design tesm"'o' ' This firao hss an ability to accomplish �he planning and da�si� work neeessury to carry� tbe px°o,�ect through tY�a g�a►eral � final plans and programs. Ttiis firm 1z�B refi.ained Gornell, < ' HoWland, Hay�es +�nd l�srryfield end Clsir A. Iii]1 Associates � �_ ((�,�1�,/I4111 j as engineering can�a.lta,nt on this p�,�ec�. Thi:s , fi�cm canducted the ta�utt'ic esn�lysls incox�orated in t�as aub�it�ASL � preliminary dev�elapment pl.s� anc� pro�am. Lsc�iscape a�chitectural �� serv�icQSS �ril1 also be pr��rided by consulting stat'Y members ��SC .� �roome, Sel ig ��nd. Oria�dulph o �, �; � Staff lxse revisvad �nd is femiliwr rrith the que��ificsLions I'' of theae firms wd finds �thes� firma kave the qualificntions to prepare e �enersl dev�elaproant plsn and program oP the ���_ comp].exity proposed. �: � $. Tt�e staff finds tlx mork�at lafarrnatidn by the applicpnt, sutfiaiant to render an opinion on ttae fessibility o� the submitted pa�eliminary j ,; plan and pro�am. � �� 9. At the request ot tbe �tuff, the sppllcant `+as requeatea to address � the requirements of the "Fes�uw" decision. A reply to this � � request is contsinod ia the documoents submitted by the appllawt �� ;. w{� entitlrci "A Zoning Propose►� for an Of!'ice-bbtor 13otel P�rk for ,i j± Fsrmers Inaurance Group". ll,n ac3d�es�dum to this documsa�t xsa �; also subm�tted to the sta3'!. Additiouel supplementary information i ia to be avsiLble to tbe stsf� and Planniag Commission by .�' ,� August 7th. t; � ` ` Page 3 StaTP Report - zC 4-73 • A��t 7, 1973 i r �s 1� . � � �. � � .. .. � . � � � � � � . .. � � .. � � .. � . .. . . . . .. � . � . . � � . .. . � . . . . � � . . ... - � �_ ' . . � . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . � . _ . � � � t — t ,��' � .. �a �` , � �. Fertinent to the Fasano d�ecisio,�►, the etatt tinds the spplicant has s+�stisiactorfly met t�Le ��ority of requiremen�ts aet tort� in : tYae Fesano case by Prov�;ng canform�ncme witrA th�e TiAa►rd Oammunity Pl.gn, _chazzge3 in condition, aoam�unity n�eed, bett,er suitabiliLy �f sub�ect site over otber si�s �can�ed Sos the' same purpc�se� and aimi�asl effect or� tht surroundiag coe�unity. Tt�e on1y�questionable srea, relsted to Fasano, Would be tbe svaila►bility o� publlc services. At the present tirme s ser+�r more►torium is in et'�ec� until ,August 13, 1973. It is u�nd,erstoc�d that'this imoratqriuu� and the subsequent � p.roposed quots system me►y liaiit se�reyj;availability unti,l the ' UniPied �vea��e;A�ency's Durhesm-Tre�►tment Plant is completed in the Fall of 1975• �, � Additiox�a,l,ly there is ttye questio�ns of adaqust.e water avei]sbility for fire ro�ectiom iron tbye Nlatz�er �k►ter Diatrict. - Mr. Bob 3ent,e�s �'' P , of this distriet hss been contacted x�gsrding thia question'and vrill respond by Augu$t 7th. � 3taft finds the questionsble availability o� sewer and water s�x°vice:s �I a temporary situa�tion en�i. n�t o� scaf'iicient me�gni�tude to d�lay �: � consideration of t�e spplic�t's pz'crFo.s�s.1. , � �� � Staf� Aeaomme�d�tioas� ; ' 1. Staff recom�nds tho applicant's prelimi��y ;deve2opment � �; plan end pro{iram be approv�ed. k': � 2. Stsff Recom�ends the planni�g coa�iesion �request the applic�nt �` show special eonc:ern for tha Yollowing ;items 'in tkie subsequent �-' general cievelop�oent plan snd program. `A a. Access and meintenwnca e�greements for the S.iV. 66th- 68th Av�nue loop and re�vin� pe:rk ax� through the : sub�ect sii:e. b. Avaia.ability e�n8 e►deqwey of sa�rer a,nd aster service i; to the site.: c. DeYinition d the proposed staging o! tbe pxo�GCt and tl�e problems inberent in me►rketing a :non-residentisl` ;; pro,�ect, :' , , � � � � � �v'� � ' Page 4 - Staff Report • ZC �►-73 - August 7, 1q73' �, ;� ;� � � ,, ,, , _ � . c�,.,,����.r.a.......�.. �.._. �3:?::.�ri::n�aM _.d.w�, . . . . . . . .. . ..:.,i, . . . . .... . . ..:. :'S ��. . _ . � . . � .. . i � . . . . . . . . . �'y ... . e r 3. StaYP rec�ommenda thi►t th�s firss or sroome, Selig an� � Oringdulph, Por�tle►n� aad Cor�ell, Ho�+.]�►nd, H�►y�es, �d � Merryti�ld•CLir A. �i11', Asao�iates Portla►nd end Corvallis, � be aStirmed as a clesi� team qualiYi�d to prepere the � � ganera]. plan nad,prog�nuio. + ; , l � ; . � i � �w.. l c ' � . � . . � . . . . .. � ' . . Y � . � . .� . . .. . � . � . �i. f. . . " . . � . ... � . . . . . . . . '� . _ � .. - .. . � . . . . � . . . . �� � � . . . ,., I : . . . . . . . . .. . . . . �. . . . . � . , '� . . . �' . . .. . � . . . , . ' . . . . .� i � . . . . . � . � . � .. . . �. . ' � ... � � ... . . . .. . � . . :.I . . . . .. .. . . . .... . � :�I .. � . � .. . ... . . . . . �. .. � .. . . � .. . � . .. . 'F�) i sl ; , jj l- � � � � Page 5 - St�►�r Report - ZC 4-73 = 1lugust 7, 1973 �. � �� . +� . _ � ��,: �. �: � �, �� f; �' �:..; TIGARD FLANN11Wf� COhII�iISSION 4 � StaP� R�port ; i' r. Augus�t 7, �.973 �;� Item 5.1 ;' CU �3-73 �'� ,. Cona.�.tiorial use ' For ra rt located north a� F1�1nut Stree� and 400 �eet �� P Pe Y east o�' S.W. 121.st Avenu�, ad.,jacent the Brookw�ay Subdiviaion. !�, i licaat �I , Arrow Heating Company ��. i� A�plicant's Request , 4 Conditiona,l use appraval to allow duplex dw�711ng un.ita 3.n � � arx R•15, single family residenti.al zone. ( � Applic�n�'s P�oposal To subdivide 2.5 acr�s in.to 8 duplex 1.o�Gs in s tof,a�. subdivisiqn prc�posal� that @ACOID�SSCS 9.77 ac�s and ineJ,udes 10 lots for sing].e family resia'lenti�l development. r .Existing Canditions � F q Surrounding Land Use: � 's A residential subdivisian exists to the west, forested land � � tu the n�rth and south and sr,mttered res�.dential an,d e,griaul�ural : uses to the �ast. � Surrouuding� zoning: G � i R-7 zoning exists ad�a,cent ��e south �nd w�st sides �f the sita. � Suburbe►n Resider�ti.al zoning exists ac�,iacent the �,o�h �nd north+eastern portion ot' the s3te. ,� duplex c4n�tional use was approved on the south side of Walnu't, ad�cent tbe sub�ect site, last A�ril. Accesst � Public acaess to �h�e site is providecl by 580 feet o�' frontage on S W. Walnut Street and 57U feet o� Pron�Eage on S.W. 12��h Avenue. The northerly portion p� t�e site� is ad�acent a� unnamecl creek in�diceted on the �i8�rd Coromunity P]�n as a potentia�. greenway area. . ��.��-'- � W:y- � �a..� . 1 U't'e�l.�ti��.5 i � Water is available �rom th� Ti$ard Water Dis'trict and sewer service from th� Utti,�i�d �e�rage Agcney. Interim Sfi,afP Racomm�ndatian: Sta��' h�s cAnvez�sed w3�th the app].ic�nt cancerning hi8 pxoposed appl3cation and the streat st�nd�rds setforth in tha City of Ti�rd Subdivision Code, Th� applicaaat he�s been informed as 'to h�s opt�.ons re�rding his application and has requested tl�s item be tabled until the Augus� 21, 1973 hearing, so ��at we may �u�,.].y consider his optior�s �nci ins�ruct t� st,o�f as to haw he vig2�es to pxoceed. St��'f recommends tabling th�.s item utYt31 the ,�ug,ust 41., 1973 ,hearing. �, � i _ i Page 2 - Sta�P Repoxt - CU 13-7� - August 7, 1973 � , r-. . .., ,_ ��� �� b` �� `a�.,` �4_; TIG;�tD P1.ANN�1� COMMISSION � � ' StsPf �epox't � Subdivisi.ons - i're].lminary P].at 1A,pproval � August 7, �973 7.1 Engle�rood (Commonweal�h Pro�erties) In�erim Staff A,ecomrooendation ; i Tha apglieant has requested this item be tabled until such t�me as the con�licts between the sulbciivi$ion and zaning ord3a�nces ara resolved. St,af� rpeommenids tabling �his item until these canflicts are resolved or the a�plic�►nt wishes to revise his p].at to meet exist�.ng Qit�r subd.ivisi�on stand�rds. 7.2 Yake �rr�ne (,�x�raw Heating CompsnY) Interim S�taff Recomm�ndation This is re7.at�d to f,te�m 5.1 on the Ag�nda, a�d. for the same �_ a�eea�sons, the app�,ic�►nt r+equests t+�bl.�ng until ,Augu�� 21, 1973 heer�.ng Staft' r�aommends tabling �h�s item until Au�us� 21, 1g73• � �,., : _ , , ; �,; �'IGAR]D PLANNZNG (o0N�1IS�TON S'Gaft' Report Site Dev�elopmsnt P1an Rev3.ew AuBust 7, �973 9.1. Sucilow Apa'r�ments Loca,tion: North o� Walnu� aixd �+50 �e��t east o� Pacitic Highwsy Sta�f Eindings BtafP has x�v3.e�w�ed th�e ��plicax►��s site and landacap�ng plans and. Pinds these plans ta be i,n �cor�f"ormsnce �3th the intent and standards aet �art�a 3.n Ghspter 1�3.5$ oF �he Tig�ard Mun3.ei�a1. Code. Sta�'f Recommenc'1�tion S'tafP reeou�ruis agpxoval o�' the sit� and landscaping plans as submitted by the appl�,can�. � 9.2 Pudget Die Cssti.ng �,ocation: 7� S.W. Bonita Road ��f F3ndin�s Th3.s sit� d;ave].opmen� p]mn review item has been a sou�ce oY' cor�us3.on to the st�f"t' an�d agplican� as related to th� Ti�srd City Cocie. A� ca� be seen in Fr�d Anc�erson�s memorandum oP Ju].y 2�+, 1q73 sntitled "Yand- ;I scap�i;ng Requirements•Front Space 5etback-F'ark3ng �,rea-�M�-2 ea�d: M-3 ', 7,ones", the Pl�,r�n3.ng Commiss3an must take 3�nto �ce�unt the standarr�s ?� of the Stte De�r+elopment Plan Rcview section oY the Tig�rd Muncip�]. i Gode. This must b� c�one eve�n i.P a p�►rking 1ot he�s 'been cons�ructed in ! accarc�nae with another section of th�e Ca�de. � 1 App�rently this interpret,ation he,s not been mad,e clear to epplic�nts i in the psst, thus they 2�ave, like Puclget Die Cast�ng, been pqving to � within 2 �'eet oY their front property lines. � 1 Th�e stat'f' feels that some eam�rami�e is in order for each case j aad 3.n this case the staZ`� reQOUanended the appl�cant landscape a a 7 foot front y�rd. This has been complied �►ith. � � . � _ :. ,: .. _ 4+�.__ 4 2. The atafF P9.nds �the gpplicant has rua�t subm�.t�ed a 1�andscape plan me��ing the submission requirements s�t forth in Section � 18.58.030 (c) o� the Tigard Niunst�ipag. Cnd�, speei�ical].y r�lating to '�tl�e �.oeation and design o�' landseapec� areas„ the vari�t�es and sizes of �trees and �lant m�ter3a�ls to 'be plau.t�ad on the site, other perti.en,ent landscape features s�zid. irri�at�on �Ystems required to rpQintE►'in trees and plant material.s". 3. Tb�e staaff f3nds �hat trees �reanot shown at 70 �'eet on center in �erk�.ng exeas as requ�.rea by sect�on i8.58.080� T'i�d Mt�n�.cipal Code. �+. Tbe staff f3.nds that tk� applicants prog�sal. to fi11 Fanno Cre�l� . Flood. P].a�.n 3s not in the publia in�terest. Fi.tling along k'�+arino Creek decreases th�e �ek'� abi].ity �o success�'ully cary a ma3or flood. Thus inereasing the �lood danger to othex l�.�e ex�d �roperty along Fanno Creek. F3.17.ing al.so disrupts th� nstux�.7. vegetation along the stream banks. This 'v�egetation controls emsion and consequent siltation, as xell as providing aestheti� beauty and wi.ld l�.fe habitat. Th�e sta�'f fi.nds the �pp1.3,eant� proposal d�s not meet th� s�.edndards e�nd. polieies se� P�rth � the Ti�ard Comvnunity P1Rn atad requixed in section 18.58.100 (�) � Staf'f Reca�ex�ia�ion The s'tafi'f' recom�err�ds d:[:�apprav�l. oY the s3te and ].exadseaping p1aYi as subm3tted. The s't�ff suggests the applicant resubmit zie�.►,,�plans re:l�,ting to the standards and palicies set forth in tY� Tigard Cammun�.ty Plaz� and �nicipsl Code. PaB� 2 - Bite D�evelopment P1an Re�riea - Au�ust 7, 1973 '� � : _ . , .. , __ . . , _ , ..."'�' • . , �� .�,.._ ..�_.. ..._... ` .._. .. .. .... . ......_ k , . . ... ,_ .._ . ..... . . .. .. .�. i.:, .. tii � � f` � � ��' { ; � . �, � � 9.3 coiumbia �rar�ooa�. & mo�.a3r� r '; I�acation: 1.2700 s ow. Hal.]. �3�.vd. � ; , S'ta�'f F'inclings: �'; ,,: ___�__ ,.�: ��.``` The staf'� finds tY� applicant�s proposa�. 3.s s3mila� �o the Pudget � `,, D i e C a s t i n� c a s e, r e l ati n g to p aving For parki�g wi.thin a required i ; � „ 20 fap�t �'ront yard 1�od:scaped are�. � � ,��i � : �he st�:ff finds a campro�ise solution is app�opriate, thus the � ap�licant �as proposed a �+� foo� lan�d.scaped areea ad�acent �Ghe � � right�f'�-way' on S.W. Ha].:L Blvd. plus landscap3.ng withix� the � ;� existing parking area. '� sta�'f �'inds t�his accept,able if additional. x R ' ]„andsc,aping is prov�,dec1 an tYte interior o�' �he psrlci.n8 �xea. _ `, The s'taf�' f3.nds th� lands�ping on tk�t: interior of the �.ot inadequat�� , siad. ric�t meetiz,g th� intent of the T��'d I�in3.�ipa� Cc�tle. The staf�' �'inds , , �►c'ic13.�iana]. pJ.axxting s3wuld be req,u�red as folltiows: t.Li , , �.. Pl.�ntin� are�s in the parrk3.n� �.ot s2wwn or� the subm3.tted �,a.�n 1 {�� should b� enlarged to a7.l.ow planti.ng �.n a1.1. �he ..sp�ae not t a � cur�ently uti�.ized by �uto's �`or par'k3.x�8� �f', �; � � ,� 2. Pl��Gi.ng stwu].d occu� a�7.�� '��� �+�ce �� the �xisting lau3.lc33ng �,; to �'urtlner visu�lly sc►f"ten the me�ss o� tkt�s build3.ng �x°om �� 1'� �J��• L7R�6-�. 8�.�.• �'� �e P�.�+'fiJ.11� B�lO�.C� q�Cl� Q21 �i� sautherly portion of tb.e �existing r`'� e�sphol.t area, soutk� of the Pe►r�ng lqt and: ad,�acent the railroad �; r�ght-o�'»w,e�y. '�s �l.anting sY�ot,r�d imclude plan me�ter�.a].s '��t 4:: �ri11 ser�en the parked. auto°s �and building mas� to the zwrth and ,�•,' i'; �LiS�'.. (; 1; �+. I,andscapi��; ��ou3.d occur in twa para7lel e�nd apposi�e �rk3,n8 ;' stal'l.s of ��k�� �orther °t�er of pa�rki.ng to meetir�g the +�i�ard �:; Municipal. Gc�� x'equi.rement �f an�e tree 70 feet on center each ;,� ;,�: w�y. s;, I ;, 5� � St�,g�' finds a],], pl,a�i�ing areas sYwuld be protected by eurbin,g �, where neeessary eud water prov3.d,ed to these aa�as or ot'h�r sucb assuraxice that plant �aterials yr1.11. survi:ve periods o� drou�ht. � The s�e►'ff ��.nd.s these preca,ut�ons necessax�y to ensure n�aintenar�ae , oP the ].a�ndscaping � s � � page 3 � 5ite Development Revi.ew � f � , I ( , . � _ ,. . . _ . _ � �. �� � � � �,,:; �.�:, St�aYY Recommendations Sta�'f recommends �he Planning Commissian approve the app�.3cants landscape plan With the fol.�owing eond�.tions: l. The app].icaz�t submit for staff appro`ra1., a revised lendscape pla�z, meeting the po3;nts aovered �,n the staff findings of thi.s reques�. � 9.�+ S�mbo's Restaurant Zoc�tion: Southesst side of �'scific Highway �+50 �'eet s�uth o� �iaa].7. B].vd., betw�en the Lone O�lc Restaurant snd Tigard Mt�tors ' � , I StaYf Find3ra�gs ' , '�he sta�f finds the applicant°s sit� and landsc�ping p.laxis substantial�y ; meet th� reg,uirements set �`orth ir� Tit1,e 1$ oP the Tig�rd Munieipl� � Caie. ; � The s�a�'f finds, however, th�;t one item, the dz�3.veway �'rom �.W. 1��.1 � � Bl�rd.., endae�;eres pu'blic safety in its present aligcam�nt. Sta��'�' o re �rve exis�ti ve e��ic�n reGOgnizes the applicant s intent tc> p s �8 � , but finds tbe public s��ety� mus�t take �rreeedence. G �taff Recommendation & ,a. �fiaff recommends the Plann3ng Commission appmve the applicant�s si'�e and a landseaping plan with the following condi�ion: � , � 1. The applicant submit, Por staff appxoval, a revised 7a�dscage i � • pl,an, eliminat3ng orae e�cist�.ng tree and straightexiing th�e cwwc�vve i�; and improving site distanc� on the drivew�e►y connecting to , S.W. Hall Blvc�.. " � � r � 9.5 Circle A & W Products � i �; Location: 13885 S.W. 82nd �,.venue ��i �i Staff k'indi�ngs ` � The sta�'f f3nds the site plan does not meet the se�back standards set ; , forth in the Ti�axd M�icipal (iode. A twelve foot �id��rd 3,s �shown � � on �he site plan, where a 20 foot sid.�yard is required. �, � , . ._.�.. ��_ . . _ ... ._ �:.. , ,�� t ��� , , �. � , ����..� , �.� �., � �5 The s'ta�£ f�,n,ds t}�e lsndscape �].an, submittecl by t�e ap�li�ant, ,,.w. �to meet the st.and�rds se`t Yorth in 'Title 18 of �he Ti�rd Municipa,l flocTe� StaYf Recommendatian The s'taYf recommends the Pl.anning Commission approve th� site �nd Ta�dsca,ping �1:an as subm;tt�sd wi.th the fallowing condi.tion�: l. That the app]�icant submi�t a revised site plari, r�flect�.ng the 20 �'oot sideyard setback requ3.remen� for M-2 zor�d 1and, as sta��d in �ect�on i8.4�.0�0 0� the ��gard Municipal Cpde. �.5 GExxe�a]. '1'�1.ephone �z°kir� Z�ot Loeation: Directly behind eycisting City H�l.l. gaxking lot, aecass on $ux'nhetn Streety 340 e�st of Main Street ; Sta�f F�.aldings � "i St�f'� �in,ds the spp�.i�ant kaas submit�ed two slternate pa�king ��ns for � parking ].ot to se�e the3.r r�ee�r of'f�ce faci],it�r locst�d. on S.W ��` Maiu Street. T}�e staf�' �inds the �,pplicant has n�ot sub�nitted � :Lazidsc;��e 0 plan necesssry �or p.].anning commission �ction. ]aa � T}� staff �.s concerned a�out safe pedestrian aceess f'rom tb� � propased �rking lat to the b�il.c�..i..ng served 1ay such psxking �' �. StaPf Recomm�xadstion ` � StsSf re�ommends the Planning Commiss�an table thi.s item until. sueh z time as a lanclscape plan is submitted for review and, ac�ion. The ; travel&3romSthet�rkPPlilcant�,a�t�irro�Pice�acfl�,iana are to saPe�y � P� �8 Y � � 9.7 Tig+�rd Water District - Shop Adi,�lli.tiox� 4� S i Loca'��.on: S.W. C�.aterbux�y L�ne, ad,ja,cen� e�ti.sting r�servoi�s on Littla Hull Mountain betwee�. S�W. 106th and 3.W. 103rd. �� � � E 5taff �inds t}ae applicant I�s not met the submission requiremei�ts � set �or�h in Sect3on 18.5$.030 of the Tigiard Mwn3.cipe�l, Co�e� This ;� i,ncludes the submi�ss3on caf an adequate 7,ar�uisaaping P�, ��►��A6 � �� ` 18nd.scaping ta ad,jacent uses,. � � �,. ��: Staff �'inds �he e�ci.sting site has 'been recently annexred to the Ci�y. ° The site retaias the Washington Coixn�ty zan,ir►g, Rr7 Single Fam�1y =4 Re�idential. The ex3.stir�g use w�,a grsiated through a con�tional u�e �pproval granted by Washington �ounty in i969. 'I+he (7nun�y's policy permits e,xpansian of aond,��ional uses witYaout ��eqgglicatr��fn,sx�nr3�►�:��,.:•;,� aonditi:ona]. use� Stsft' Reeommenc�tion �tsf�' recomm�ends denial of tk� applicsnts requegt for Sit�e Development F1sn RevieW approv�l and requests the applicant subm3�t a d�tailed landscape plan sensit3v�e to tl� su�rrotindi.ng residentie�l. use. Staff also rcquest the app�lir,ant submi� a letter tn the Planrxing Cbmmissi�n, detai],ing the intenc�ed use oP �he shop addi��.on. 9.8 L�mb-Weston OfPice Addi�ion Loc�tien: 6600 S.W. giampton Street west of existing bu3�.ding Stsff k'�.ndings S�aP�' Yinds the applic�n.t has request�d a re^vision �n �heir sits and lsndscape pl�ans by ttse Pl�xaaiing tbtnmission on ,]�.y �17, �973 �,'l�is ravis�an i,s due to a corporr�te cLecis�oa� no� to c�nstx�uct one �� modu�e of the pxopased bu3.].ding add3.tion. The area elim3.nat�d �rom . bu3lding cc�v�ra� has been prop�sed �or landscaping in;�a manxier acceptable tv the sfiaf'�. Sta�r Recommendatian St�f'�' recommends approval of the revised l�ndscape plan as an amenduooant to the landsaape plan approved by the P].�nning Commo�.ssian on ,hil.y 17, 1973• ' � i l � i } E �-: _ ._.... ,, .,. ._ , � , _ . � t��'' �° : �ti�.�� TIC.AR.T2 PL�iI�iNING COMMTSSI�N Sf.s�'f Kepvrt Subdivisiwns b',,i�.irr�r,�Iaand:�:�rtitioni,ng August 7, �9?3 8.,1 Irvington�MAOre ; I,�cati.on: 82C35 S.W. Hunz�.ker Strsety ad�eeer��t I3eu►z�er on 1 w�sterly �xtremity of Irv3.ng�an-Moore site. This is a proposal by th� Irv�gton-Mr�are �ompany to partition � � .96 acre parcel of and �'rom �heir existing 14 aca�e site. � ' purpose of this pa�rtitioning is to pxovid� site �'or an of'�ice buiZd3ng to � ser've their ��,.stiz� �snufactur3ng com�lex. ; � S�ba�� Findings � , . Q 1. 'Th�e partitioned. �rc�l, as praposed is ad�acent a�ad t�s �ed�q��e � access az�t� S.W. Hwnziker Str�et and d;aes rwt create a str�et or � way. � �; �. The ap�l.�cant� h�s subm3�-ted �n adeyaate sketch map, fulfillir� � the requirem�nts aet �oztta in Seetion 17.2�+,020 0� the �i�d A�an��ipa1, Cc�de. 3. The staYf Yaas determined the applica;n,t d,o�s n,ot intenc�. to 3�.vide the existing �.ot into mare ��ian th� progos�d smpl.l parce3.. � �fj 4. Tl� stafP �3.nds the appli�arat's propoeal does not conf'lict aith `'' �{ �►pplieable sta�dar�is �ro subdiv3.sion set forth ir► C2�pter 17.24 0� the �� Tipe►rd Mun�lc�p�l, Gode. �� �: 5. �e app�icant has xwt dedicated suf^ff.cient right-of'-�ray �width along '_ S.W. Hunz3.l�er 5treet far future �treet improve�ents. S.W. Yiunzilcer ,' Stre�t is ittc'ii.cated as a Cnllector st�reet on� the 7l'i�e►rd Conamounity � a; Plau �►nd, as such, requ3res a 60 Yoot minimum rig,ht-of-w�y. ;A ,: �10 foa� r�ght�f-way now ex3sts �long this protion of S.�d. Hunziker �� Street. �� �i }; St,e�;�f Re�ommenc�ation tl� r• rov�]. of �be applicants m3n�or :Land. psrtitioning � S�� recommends aPP � wi�h �he �'ollo�rtng c4ridi�tions: �' �; � �k,� , � �".. . _ . i , . _ ; : .. . , . , � , � , ,_..:_... . , . _ . ,, , .-. _ . ,. . . �'' �'± �sS + � � � � � rt.. � �,�� �., w ?�� ,, �: c � { �: 1. �he apP�i�t eledicate ten feet caf ac�.��.onal road ��< � r�ght-oY-w�y alang �Yiat prc�t�on of �Y� a�plicant�s �; ', pr�p�r�y �►d,�acent S.W. tiunz3,k�r Street. �a3,d c'iedication �< she�11. be completed prio� 'to issuance of tla� occupan.cy 3�` }-; permit for the proposed off�.ce build3ng. k!. �:� �', ;.; �: r, �,: t,,, }5`; . . ... . .f�,;.',. I ('� �'�1 N'% �;�i i:. . . � � .. . . ;;� E,.i ;� ,:; !,� ,: SI �i e3 a,� ze �: �� ?� d`! ��f,',�I �i tF �.• �' ),, j �: ��� If �,' �'. PaB� � - xx"����n Moore • Minor La�nd Partitioz�.ng �, �: � � �; B; 4.: �; i� �. �. � �a. .�