Planning Commission Packet - 06/20/1972 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
AGENDA
Tigard Planning Commission
• Regular Meeting - June 20, 1972
Member Section - 7:30 P.M.
Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
Twality Jr. High School lecture room
1.650 S.W. 97th, Tigard, Oregon
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
.earl..
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting May 16, 1972
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Conditional Use and Variance CU 6-72 & V 3-72
LEO D. WHITE, Applicant
A request for sideyard and access variance approval and
conditional use approval, to permit a silkscreen operation
on an M-4, Industrial Park parcel located on the southwest
side of S.W. Burnham Street approximately 110 feet south
of S.W. Ash Street (Tax Map 281 2AD, tax lot 2700)
1. Staff Recommendation
2, Public Hearing
3. Commission Discussion and Action
B. Conditional Use CU 7-72
RALPH J. PETERS AND ALOYS SCHULZ, Applicants
A request for conditional use approval to allow three
duplexes on an R-7, Single Family Residential parcel
comprising 11 acres, located on the west side of
S.W. Tiedeman Avenue approximately 470 feet south
of S.W. Tigard. Street (Tax bap 181 34D, part of
tax lot 5600)
4
(
1. Staff Recommendation.
2. Public Hearing
3. Commission Discussion and Action
V. OTHER ITEMS
A. Subdivision (S 3-72)
"Burnham Park" (east side of S.W. Ash Street approximately
800 feet north of S.W. Frewing Street)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
B. "Shady Lane" Planning Study
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
C. 115th Street Dedication (Miller-Clark property)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
D. Minor Land Partition (S.W. Lincoln and. Center Streets)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
E. Selection of July Study Session Date
F. Election of Officers
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Pg. 2 - PC Agenda - June 20, 1972
*mew=lesP
M I N U T E S
C .
Tigard Planning Commission
Regular Meeting June 20, 1972
Twality Jr. High School lecture room
14650 S.W. 97th, Tigard, Oregon
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 8:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
A. Present: Commissioners Barkhurst, Hartman, Lewis,
Nicoli, Severson, Whittaker and Chairman
Paterson: Fred Anderson, City Attorney:
Ray Rangila, City Planner
f B. Absent: Commissioner Paulat
" III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. The minutes for the May 16, 1972 meeting were approved
as submitted.
IV.. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Conditional Use and Variance (CU 6-72 & V 3-72)
LEO D, WHITE,Applicant
A request for sideyard and access variance approval
and conditional use approval to permit a silkscreen
operation on an M-4, Industrial Park parcel located
on the southwest side of S.W. Burnham Street
approximately 110 feet south of S.W. Ash Street
(Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2700)
1. Staff Recommendation
a. The staff recommended approval with conditions.
2. Public Hearing
a. The public hearing was opened.
b. Mr. George Penrose testified in favor of the
request.
t.
c. Mr. Penrose stated that the applicant agreed
with the staff recommendation.
d.. Mr. Woodfield, adjoining .property owner, stated
that he felt that this was a good solution to
the problem of small nonconforming lots.
-e. Are Daniels of Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels
• ( Contracting Co., stated that he may apply
for a similar variance request for his adjoining
property to the east.
f. The public hearing was closed.
3. Commission Discussion and Action
a. Chairman Paterson asked if the abutting properties
would be allowed to build on the property lines.
b. The City .Planner stated that they would.
c. Mr. Whittaker asked if .the abutting properties
were under one ownership.
d. The City Planner stated that the abutting
properties were under separate ownerships.
e. It was moved (Lewis) , seconded (Severson) and
passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present to approve the request with the
following conditions:
• f 1. That the building be located on the westerly
property line.
2. That the Planning Commission review and
approve a completed site developpeat plan
prior to issuance of a building permit.
B. Conditional Use (CU 7-72)
RALPH J. PETERS AND ALOYS SCHULZ, Applicants
A request for conditional use approval to allow
three duplexes on an R-7, Single Family Residential
parcel comprising 11 acres, located on the west side
of S.W. Tiedeman Ave. approximately 470 feet south
of -.W. Pigard Street (Tax Map 1S1 34D, part of
tax lot. 5600)
1. Staff Recommendation
a. The staff recommended approval with conditions.
2. Public Hearing
a.'' :The public hearing was opened.
b. Mr. Bastian, 11675 S.W. Tiedeman Avenue, stated
that he had no objections as long as the duplexes
were nice.
Pg. 2 - PC Minutes - June 20, 1972
•
c, Mre Hartman asked about the traffic on
Tiedeman,
d, ;,Mr. Hartman expressed concern over the cars
backing onto Tiedeman.
e, Mr. Peters stated that he intended to use a
composition roof,
.f. The public hearing was closed,
3. Commission Discussion and Action
a. Mr. Hartman asked how much of the property
. 0 subject to flooding.
b. Mr. Peters stated that 15 percent of his property
is subject to flooding and 25 percent of Mr. Schulz;s
property.
c. Mr. Barkhurst questioned condition 4 in the staff
recommendation,
d, Mr. Whittaker asked if one driveway could be
placed between the duplexes allowing parking
in. the back.
e, Mr. Peters stated that there wasn't enough
apace behind the duplexes to allow parking.
f. Mr. Barkhurst asked if 30 feet would be
enough for the greenway,
g. Chairman Paterson stated that with a school
on the other side of the creek there would
be-enough open space.
h. It,,was moved (Barkhurst) , seconded (Nicoli)
to delete condition 4 in the staff recommendation.
The motion was defeated by a 4 to 3 vote.
(Commissioners Barkhurst, Nicoli and Severson
voting yes. Commissioners Hartman, Lewis,
Whittaker and Paterson voting no)
i. It was moved (Hartman) , seconded (Whittaker)
a ..,passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present' to approve the request with the following
conditional
1, That the duplexes not having garages each
have two covered off-street parking spaces.
2. That five (5) feet be dedicated to the city
along Tiedeman Avenue for future street
improvements.
Pg. 3 - PC Minutes - June 20, 1972
3. That a minimum of thirty (30) feet.be
dedicated to the city along Fenno Creek
as part of the Community°s greenway system.
4. That* the roofs be wood shingles or shakes,
unless specifically changed through the site
development plan review procedure.
•
5. That a completed site development plan be
reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission prior to issuance of building
permits.
V. OTHER ITE)
A. Subdivision (S 3-72)'
"Burnham Park"(east side of S.W. Ash Street approximately
800 feet north of S.W. Frewing Street)
1, Staff Recommendation •
a. The staff recommended approval with conditions.
2. Commission Discussion and Action a. Chairman Paterson questioned the lot sizes
4 around the cul--de-sacs,
b. Mr. Lewis-stated he felt lots 7 and 15 were
very narrow.
c.• Mr.• Nicoli questioned the placement of houses
• on the lots. •
d, - Chairman Paterson asked if the developer
hada house design that would fit on the
narrow lots, •
e.. . The developer stated that he did not have
any specific plans yet.
f. Mr. Barkhurst• suggested that lots .17 and 18
be combined to make a duplex lot, and make
lots 15 and 16 larger.
g. The-;Commission discussed the feasibility of
sidewalks on the cul-de-sacs. . They decided
to have sidewalks around the cul-de-sacs.
h, It was moved (Lewis) , seconded (Severson)
and passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present to grant preliminary approval with
the' following conditions:
Pg. 4 - PC Minutes - June 20, 1972
P
1. That engineering plans and specifications
shall be approved: prior to acceptance
of the final plat.
2. That four-foot sidewalks be located next
to the Curbs, to meander around clustered
mailboxes. .
3. That a five-foot utility easement be
provided along all property lines. if
4. That lots 17 and 18 be combined for
a duplex lot and lots 15 and 16 made
larger.
R. It was moved (Lewis) , seconded (Severson) and approved
by unanimous vote of the Commission present .to grant
the Chairman the authority to sign the public street
dedication agreement for the 35 by- 205 foot
parcel located on the south side of S.W. Pacific
Highway across from S.W. McKenzie Street.
C. "Shady Lane" Planning Study
(_ 1. Staff Recommendation
a. The staff recommended preliminary approval of
Concept A.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
a. It was the consensus of the Commission to amend
to designate the
it Plan
Tigard Community g
the ig Y"Shady Lane"" study area as "residential-commercial"
D. 115th Street Dedication (Miller-Clark property)
1. Staff Recommendation
a. The Staff recommended approval.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
a. It was moved (Levis) , seconded (Hartman)
and passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present to approve the request.
C
Pg. 5 - PC Minutes - June 20, 1972
E. Minor Land Partition (S.W. Lincoln and Center Streets)
1. Staff Recommendation
a. The staff recommended approval.
2. Commission Discussion and ActiOn
a. It was moved (Nicoli) , seconded (Hartman')
and passed by unanimous vote of Commission
present to approve the request.
F. July study session will be on July 6.
G. Election of Officers
a. The commission accepted Chairman Paterson's
resignation and commended him for a job well
done.
b. Mr. Nicoli nominated Mk. Whittaker for president.
Mt. Lewis seconded the nomination. The nomination
passed by unanimous vote of the Commission. present.
c, Chairman Paterson nominated Mk. Hartman for Vice
President. . Mk. Severson seconded the nomination.
The nomination passed by unanimous vote of the
Commission present.
H. Pudget Western
a. It was moved (Lewis) , seconded (Hartman) and
passed by unanimous vote of the Commission present
to give the City Administrator the authority to
grant a maximum 6 month extension on the removal
of the building.
VI, ADJOURNMENT: 1025 P.M.
(1_
Pg. 6 - PC Minutes - June 20, 1972
_
` „,....44:?.-:;;?4,%, ( 44. rt y f 4 of a .,s`"S'S' h r 3^ . a - '' 1 � „4,4`. '41, p 4,4„.”' $ w
v tltt "E G rr � r
r s _
C ''','7'0.20,',,:.:;.-,,,,,..,, 4{ � i r yt r . #a.� Y�]�01�
°'''n G”]• j n r s-4ir� i.
S(((11 �
(((yyyyyy1111
y
n S
3 N`7,4 . i
Af
F,
U
Tigard Planning Comeiieion
Staff Report ..,,:i,,;,,1-4.),...!;,
ne 20
Iteacms CU 61972.72 ' ' ' '.. :
i'',. . ,
Conditional Use and Variance
' designated as tax lot 2700 on tax map 251 2AD
For property designs ,rl
Applicant
Leo D. White l
4 .,M1�
licant's Request
`__ Side yard and access variance and conditional use approval,
to allow a silkscreen operation on an M-4, Industrial Park
parcel. .
i
Location and Land Use of Subject Property
lc The vacant subject site is located on the southwest side of
S.W. Burnham Street approximately 110 feet south of S.W. Ash
Street.
1
gurrounding Zoning and Land Us_e
Zoning on the northerly side of Burnham Street is M-3, Light
Industrial and is developed with .light industrial uses and
scattered single family homes. Zoning along the southerly
t side of Burnham Street is M-4, Industrial Park. The two abutting ,1
..,,,
parcels to tine northwest support nonconforming single family r,
dwellings. The abutting lot to the southeast supports a
building contractor, and to the south the sewerage treatment
}
plant.
3
. x:.
'44.1,-:f, 4 i r: ?!ki, iit ti£"b1. u i--;b. iy r • g b,' Y b • b Y 1 ,, .il r --(4* ""-
d w i y
' a X32 ' 'S ' � 4+ , , ;' �,
:p.F ,.. +r).^ ..• , .4. ab r •-* t .• •
. ..
iy
t;
raj
Conformance ormance with the Community Plan ',v
The adopted Tigard Community Plan designates the subject area, ,'?
for "Commercial-Industrial" development.. The requested use
conforms with the Plan. ''.-',': i'
'
t ' Staff Findings and Recommendation
The staff finds that the requested use conforms with the adopted, !`!
Community Plan and would be compatible with future surrounding
land uses.
ir c, The subject tax lot existed prior to City zoning--and therefore
i ',. cannot be required to meet existing M-4 standards regarding
' lot size and lot width. ;
Iz
It is the staff's opinion that the proposed. building should be
located on the westerly property line, and that a similar variance
I should be approved for the two abutting westerly lots when ready
for industrial development. Both variances would then allow the
connection of the industrial buildings and off•street parking
Ii
areas.
I . It is recommended that the variances and conditional uses be
�� approved with the following conditions:
1. That the building.be located on the westerly property
1....: line.
f:'
r 2. That the Planning Commission review and approve a
completed site development plan prior to issuance of
1 a building permit.
f'
t .
i
r
I
Pg. 2 - Staff Report - Leo White 6-20-72
.a
3
....
I .
,..,
.\r-
As.
-4.
.. •
__—
,
/ .
,
,/
\ ,
‘I'S 4111111 11,
li
/42 ,
,‘
..,
..
,
.,
v STP 1
OW0
i
f ,
, • ,
,
,
,.. :
,r
,
t
t
\ ' ,
i
i ---..-2:-.
0
U
N e,
N__ ,-• , \%. I _
\.■'......": ..."'. ''''N
i .
R7 ,
.... _ _
, .... . ,
... .. .. ■ N
- .
( Imo of consideration
il
Sick Yard a Access Variance
\\NVConditionol Use for . ,
Silkscreen Operation
...
scale /m a P6n,
sr .
411=111•11•1111
NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by
the Planning Commission c.lf the City of Tigard within. the
Twality Jr. High School lecture room. at 14650 S.W. 97th.
Tigard„ Oregon on June 20, 1972 at 8:00 Pail.. with respect
to the following:
An application by Leo D. White for a Side lard
and Access Variance and. Conditional Use approval
for a silkscreen operation, on an 104., Industrial
Park. parcel located on the southwest side of
S.W. Burnham Street approximately 110 feet scuth
of S.W. Ash Street (Tax Nap 2S1 2AD) tam lot
2700)
All persons having an interest in the matter are invited to
attend and be heard.
(
,.; ,,r a °,,r t o "Fq t4 s 'r,?¢�� ' at q n ''. ' ; 6,„�
a P„lar h ��,4 ,,'4',,,f4 r a
the {�F t`!`f
k yr'
Tigard Planning Commission
1 Staff Report '
June 20, .1.972 i.,
Item CU 7-72
1.
!rk
t
Conditional Use
r
t
€ For property designated as part of tax lot 5600 on tax map < '
1 151 34D
a .I
Applicants 1
f Ralph J. Peters and Aloys Schulz `A
i
L ( Applicant's Request
t Conditional Use approval to permit three duplexes on an R-7, {
Single Family Residential parcel comprising li acres.
K
t Location and Land Use of Sub)ect Property
i
The vacant subject site is located on the west side of 1
S.W. Tiedeman Avenue approximately 470 feet south of
S.W. Tigard. Street
t
,f Surrounding Zoning and Land Use 1'
I
The area surrounding the subject site is zoned R-7, Single
Family Residential and is developed with scattered single
family dwellings. The abutting parcel to south supports a
duplex. The Tigjara School District property, located to the
Ii west across Fenno Creek, is planned for a high school and
junior high school site.
■ Conformance with the Community P.;.an
The adopted Tigard Community Plan designates the subject area
for "Urban Low Density Residential" development, having an
H average density of 4 dwelling units per gross residential acre.
14
1 s
;
• ,.a
The request conforms with densities designated in the plan, :, :r
Staff Findings and Recommendation :I
1 The staff finds that the proposed use will be compatible with
existing and future surrounding land uses.
It is the staff's opinion that the subject property is a
1. reasonable location for duplexes, due to its relationship ''
with Fanno Creek and the proximity to the Tigard School
l,'
District property.
. It is also the staff's opinion that better site development
• standards should be required than was the case for the duplex
on the abutting parcel to the south, in order to insure }
compatible development with nearby single family dwellings. .t1
It is recommended. that the request be approved with the
following conditions:
E 1. That the duplexes not having garages each have two • j
(,. covered off-street parking spaces.
2. That five (5) feet be dedicated to the city along
'
Tiedeman Avenue for future street improvements.
ii 3. That a minimum of thirty (30) feet be dedicated to
the city along Fenno Creek as part of the Community's I
s greenway system.
,,
t
4. That the roofs be wood shingles or shakes, unless
specifically changed through the site development
plan review procedure.
5. That a completed site development plan be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to
issuance of building permits.
r
iPg 2 - Staff Report - Peters and Schulz June 20, 1972
I
. , .
... ... .
.
, I .
(... R7
4,......, M 3
. . ,...., „, , „......„.„,„.., ,./WEE 7.
7764,70
SCHOOL
4k\4\.\\\<'0 0• 4 R:
1>I9rmcr
R 7
R7
AL
2 W451-IIAIGTOk? COI r.k.'
OM - ell areirm•ftworm■emeerswa or? -Ibt
( 'V
\
i .
\ ,
5 V,
•
.
; .
r7...47----74,7777,,ER/NE• 51 . . .^.MY airy ars 1111•111111111111COMS.00
■
/ i •
N
cry/yr/awl/. LE
i -
k\s‘lotto ot cr cm ct 6,:ration
11.\\\M 3 Duplexes scale 1%200'
C.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held.
by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard within the
Twality Jr. High School lecture room,, at 14650 S.W. 97th,
Tigard, Oregon on June 20, 1972 at 8;oo P.M., with respect
to the following:
An application by Ralph J. Peters and Aloys
Schulz for conditional use approval to allow
three duplexes on an R-7, Single Family
Residential parcel comprising li acres, located
on the west side of S.W. Tiedemen Avenue
approximately 470 feet south of S.W. Tigard.
Street. (Tax Map la 3)4D, part of tax lot
5600)
All persons having an interest in the matter are invited to
attend and be heard.
0
W' :rr ,„ 4g 2 S r 45 , " v c"' ,'C•i Y 4 z '! 1,r ' ,, , r , , {}
Y �, o� r.+. � 1„.",,,t'''
'�f � �r� r * � E� rig' 7*� � ' , � r;,� '�� 4y � n��� d �»�}�a� ;�A
� y� C "`J t'4 N§ aci alb r o ' ay v.= 9l��r y
p y z y i,
1- ,4,',,,,§f.:, ' 'F �0 1 ,5 '414'4": l'''' , r + .t
! e k,k 54,,, y'1 4in .i Vywry , ri,,,at
.
1.,-. ',„
{ �h yaY'
k
Tigard Flaming Coaruissiot► �
' ' Staff Report
�
r.
June 20, 1972 { Y
Item S 3-72... t ;f�F
`�ri;
,
11, Subdivision Name .
f', Burnham Park '` v
t Sponsor
Arthur J. Pruitt
t
Engineer
Hilton Engineering Company plicant's Request ='
f
Preliminary approval i of a subdivision plat and variances n
subdivision design standards related to sidewalk locations and
widths, and cul-de-sac street widths and radii requirements. r$y
plat proposes to divide 4'.1 acres into 18 res-
t'
preliminary p
t,
idential lots.
Location and Zonini `'
The subject property is located on the southeast corner of
,,
S.W. Hill Street and. S.W. Ash Street, and is zoned R-7, +`,
Single Family Residential. ' ,,
i-
i
Conformance with the Community Plan
f The adopted Tigard Community Plan designates the subject
property for "Urban, Law Density Residential" development,
E having an average density of 4 dwelling units per gross
t residential acre. The density of the proposed subdivision
would be approximately 4.3 dwelling units per gross ,,,£ residential acre.
s
C" a
k + v 44,4 64„ r� -, tf.344.1 KA1C.�4 rF u d :rN .w �c. � o.1 , 1
.a�
w
, , ..
o- ' ' t, '.5 „k0-'1.f,' .;;.... 4 J F s;+. x S `'.hg K+” t a \I ' O" r ro >i ( ,F ? k t ` t•t ) n , S � ., d tt i`.i J 4 'iii: , tS2 S as , C ; -. >
.4 r", d a, r +, r •5,, ti j d,,,,s �,,..;!..-.,t,..,...:', s t: - rk : s �i:
, n r r 'y i a ., k . ,,, ,., ice A 1 x.. t ' J'v t
x`.
r• i 3 r w � P z
r i�� ad's � s+, �� ur ry�',t �� � � 3 �`� i jfi+ .,,li?d'.
a c�4 rr
'. v4.,
t''M S� d r� !S U ; s �¢�Av�', .4 ' :u :
s a f
t , ,,t i �,is° ,.p'.t,'y` rr}r� fixt� F qp �` I:t 4 i�, t ,1,.i„
°ut bk c a �q` PjI t „ ; f wm t 't 't k�q�
,
fti t /4, ; , r 4
• r d
' 45 ,
}+ gtaff F mm
and Recoendatiai
'4�r'' ' The staff finds that the proposed X10-foot riles of way
cul-de-sacs will be adsqurte for utilities, 4-foot .
it is still the
. widths Yoiwsver, s
street the
. and , ,
aideYelks, � , r„
staff's opinion that sidewalks are unnecessary for short ,,
r cul-de-sacs. It is also the staff's opinion that 4-foot
sidewalks should be provided on both sides of S.W. Hi]l „
r ,tt�
Street.
f
; . ; The staff recommends that the cul-de-sac street pavement xidths.be ��;>
,,,
( , 28 feet and that sidel+alks, if required, be 4 feet in width Mad Mp,
located next to the curbs (to oleander around clustered meilboaee). 4wt
The staff recommends that the Planning 0ou ission consider deleting
sidewalks
on cul-de-sacs 'of less than 200 feet in length.
The
�5
` staff also recommends that the cul-de-sac radii be 40 feet. tK'k
(r It is recommended that preliminary approval be granted with. ,,
the following conditions: '
onditions s •y'1
1 1. That engineering plans and specifications shall be
f. .. ' approved prior to acceptance of the final plat.
2. That four-foot aidsniallks be located next to the curbs,
to meander around clustered mailboSes
3. That a five-foot utility easement be provided along
i
all property lines. `;.
a
1
II:”
•
•
r:
' Pg. 2 - Staff.Report - Burnham Park - June 20, 1972
.sr..tih3>;;t54 '�: `