Planning Commission Packet - 10/20/1970 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
',
AGENDA
Tigard Planning Commission
Regular Meeting - October 20, 1970
Member Section
Public Hearing 8:00 P.M.
Fowler Jr, High School Library
12080 S.W. Main Street, Tigard, Ore.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting, September 15, 1970
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zone Change
GARFIELD and ARDATH HUBBLE, applicants
reques or a zone c ange from A-2 (multi-family
residential) to C-4 (neighborhood commercial) on
a 1.83 acre parcel of land located at 14240 S.W.
Pacific Highway (Map 2S1 10A. tax lots 400 and 501)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Public Hearing
3. Commission Discussion and Action
B. Conditional Use
ELLA L. FRISONy, applicant
A request for a conditional use for two duplexes in a
C-3 (general commercial) zone on a 0.35 acre parcel
of land located at 7880 S.W. Pfaffle Street (Map
1Si 36CD tax lot 300)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Public Hearing
3. Commission Discussion and Action
C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment
CITY OF TIGARD, applicant
A proposed amendment to the Tigard Zoning Ordinance to
include a C-P, Commercial Professional District.
1. Staff Recommendation
2, Public Hearing
3. Commission Discussion and Action
V. OTHER ITEMS
A. Mira Park Subdivision
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
B. • Dubury Addition
I 1. Staff Recommendation
2. Commission Discussion and Action
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda- October 20, 1970
M I N U T E S
Tigard Planning Commission (�
Regular Meeting - October 209 1970
Member Section - 7:30 P.M.
Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M,
Fowler Jr. High School Library
12080 S.W. Main Street, Tigard, Ore.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at
8:00 P.M. R.
IIe ROLL CALL
A. Present: Commissioners Nicola, Peterson, Severson,
Whittaker, Woodard and Chairman Paterson;
Keith Thompson, Director of Public Works;
and Ray Rangila, City Planner
Bo Absent: Commissioners Fletcher, Goslin and Lewis
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. The minutes for the September 15, 1970 meeting were
approved as submitted.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment
CITY OF TIGARD, applicant
a proposed amendment to the Tigard Zoning Ordinance to
include a C-P, Commercial Professional District.
1. Staff Recommendation and Review
20 Public Hearing
as No one appeared
bo The public hearing was closed
3. Commission Discussion
ao Chairman Paterson indicated that the proposed
district would be a desirable amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance.
b, Consensus among the commissioners present was
in agreement with the staff recommendation. r
co No changes in the proposed zone were recommended,
B. Zone Change
GARFIELD and ARDATH HUBBLE, applicants
A request-or a zone change from A-2 (multi-family
residential) to C-4 (neighborhood commercial) on
a 1,83 acre parcel of land located at 14240 S.W.
Pacific Highway (Map 2S1 10A tax lots 400 and 501)
1. Staff Recommendation for. Denial
2. Public Hearing
a. Mr. Hubble, the applicant, spoke in favor of
the request. He indicated that the requested
C-4 district would be compatible with the
zoning and land use trend along Highway 99-W.
b. Mrs. Barbara Jones, representing Canterbury
Crest, raised questions concerning access
and egress problems near the intersection of
Canterbury Lane and Highway 99-W. She felt
that landscaping and satisfactory development
standards for the subject property should be
required in order to insure compatible develop-
ment with adjoining parcels, minimize traffic
conflicts, and improve the visual entrance to I
the City of Tigard. She also stated that
perhaps the proposed non-retail zone would be
most appropriate for the subject property.
c. The public hearing was closed
3, Commission Discussion and Action
a. Chairman Paterson questioned Mr. Hubble about
the proposed use of the property and if a
development plan had been completed.
b. Mr. Wayne Coffee, representing Allan C. Edwards,
replied by saying a real estate office was the
use now proposed, but that an over-all develop-
ment scheme had not been completed.
c. Chairman Paterson then asked Mr. Coffee if
the proposed professional office district
would be acceptable to the developers, as
the real estate office would be an outright
use in the proposed non-retail commercial
district, Mr. Coffee responded by saying that
he thought it would be acceptable, although
a complete plan was not ready.
d, Chairman Paterson said that he thought the
requested C-4 zone and proposed real estate
office could conform to the staff's recom-
mended non-retail district.
e. Ray Rangila, City Planner, indicated that the
C-4 zone was a retail commercial district not
having any landscaping provisions, and that
its development standards would not promote
compatible office/apartment development. In
addition, he said that zone changes could not
be legally conditioned.
f. It was moved (Nicoll) , seconded (Severson) and
passed by majority vote of the Commission
present (Commissioners Whittaker and Woodard
voting no) that the application be approved.
Pg. 2 Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/70
C. Conditional Use
ELLA L. PRISON, applicant
A request for a conditional use for two duplexes in
a C-3 (general commercial) zone on a 0.35 acre parcel
of land located at 7880 S.W. Pfaffle Street (Map
151 36CD tax lot 300)
to Staff Recommendation for approval with provisions
2. Public Hearing
a. Mrs. Prison, the applicant, spoke in favor of
the request. She thought. the duplexes, not
the apartments, were to front Pfaffle Street.
b, Chairman Paterson reviewed the proposed site
plan, and noted that the duplexes were shown
to be located at the rear of the subject
property.
c. The public hearing was closed.
3. Commission Discussion and Action
a. It was moved (Woodard) , seconded (Severson)
and passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present that the application be approved with
staff provisions
1. That the periphery of the O-3 portion of
the subject property be screened by a 6°
fence, landscaped and maintained.
2. Drainage plans shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to
development.
V. OTHER ITEMS
A. Mira Park Subdivision
1. Staff Recommendation for preliminary approval with
provisions.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
a. Chairman Paterson said that Park Street was
semi-improved.
b. Keith Thompson, Public Works Director,
recommended that curbs, street lighting and
sanitary curbs be required for the portion
of Park Street fronting the subdivision.
c. Mr. Holly and Mr. Lipscomb, representing
Wilsey and Ham, Inc. , spoke in favor of the
preliminary plat, and indicated revisions
might be necessary for lots 3 thru 14.
d. It was moved (Whittaker) , seconded (Severson)
and passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present that preliminary approval be granted
lots 1 and 2, and that the remainder of the
preliminary plat be referred to the Subdivision
Committee for further study.
Pg. 3 - Planning Commission Minutes - 10/20/70
1 Bo Dubury Addition
1. Staff Recommendation to table preliminary plat.
20 Commission Discussion and Action
ao It was moved (Woodard) seconded (Whittaker)
and passed by unanimous vote of the Commission
present to table the preliminary plat
VI0 ADJOURNMENT: 9:30 P.M.
Pg. 4 - Planning Commission Minutes - 10/20/70
r
s n
,� i
'�.#�p ) n Dort s.
Staff: Report
October 20, 1970
Agenda. Item 4-A
Zone Change, •
For property described as tax lots 400 and 501 on tax map
2S110A • •
Applicant •
Garfield and Ardath Hubble ' .
Applicant's Recuest
Approval of a change of zone c asrifioation from A-2, multi-
family residential to 0-4, neighborhood commercial on parcels
containing 1.83 acres. .
Location and land use of Subject Pro r
The subject site is located on thv e east side of Pacific Highway
approximately 140 feet north of Canterbury Lane, and supports
one single family dwelling.
Surrounding Zonin and Land Use
The abutting -' parcels s to the east and south are undeveloped
• and to the northeast support a convalescent hone. The 0-4
zoning to the north supports the Farm House Maple Shop, . .a
real estate office and an automobile service station. To the •
west across Pacific Highway the Canterbury Shopping Center is
under. development.
Applicant's Justification
"Highest and best use same as adjacent and near by properties
zoned C-4 --- premises too close to 9904 for residential use.
Requested zone compatible with use pattern" .
Conformance to the Preliminar C.m,r 4 - ' 'i ..,
e pre minary compre ens ve p an , es 7: es the subject
property for "residential-commercial" development, the .
intent of which is to provide integrated and planned apartment,
office and business development. The Plan text emphas.isee
the problem of continued "strip commercial" coning along ,
Highway 99-W and recommends a system of .frontage roads
serving planned unit developments. The request for 0-4
zoning does not conform to the intent et the preliminary
comprehensive plan. •
Staff Findings and Recommendation
The following findings reveal that a non-retail commercial class
ification served by a frontage road, or very limited access' to
99-4, would closely conform the subject mite to the preliminary
comprehensive plan.
Advantages •
I .
1. The site is well exposed to traffic along Highway 99-W
•
rM,S
pl 1 �_5r S
//�� 4..
2. arterial, the tsubject..si tebe joys *. ►i4 'Ve �O*.*.*ia '. ' w '� *
position.
Disadvantages
1. The C-4 zone does not promote compatible business-
apartment development and will maximise further traffic
circulation problems along 99.W.
2. A frontage road does not serve the subject parcels.
3. The preliminary Comprehensive Plan designates planned
office and apartment development for.the subjaat pro ►ertlr"
4. A non-retail commercial tone hating sufficient dere]opmeat
standards would minimise traffic problems aldng '99 7W
and promote compatible development.
5. , Sufficient undeveloped retail commercial zoning ie
located to the north along 99-W.
Based on the above considerations, it is the staff's opinion that
it is inappropriate to continue retail commercial. *strip" develm t;
south along 99-W, and that a non-retail none classification wota k.... ,
be more compatible with adjoining residential development.
It is recommended that the request be denied.
1
i
i
ti. A
f
,
f
t
,
,
•
1 x
1
1
Pg. 2 - Staff Report, Hubble Zone. Change -, '10/20/79'- ' ,, 1
i
i= . ,. v _,e,,.. _. � 1 .. nx ",vaw 3fCl'l•.,d q'"4 {I k 1 . .1 •"IF,T:
, -- —
. •
,..
9 , 4' GAARDE ST. - • SW MC DONALD
, - 1
,
;
•••:'• A e% R 7 . ..:" ..4. . ..-
A . . ti
LI
r
,
... ,.
4 4
. . .' 1.
411'
, .
. ' • 41%4* [1
*...
.4111111p
t•
[
, r
, .
SA
. ,
. t'
L'
Nt, t\INV'
. ;.
I i
1-
. ,
. .
. . . . .
. . .
______ • , ,,
4. i.
• ii:
. P.
II
ZONE CHANGE
area of consideration . 'It
A2 TO . C 4 1
•
.....
. -..,. 1
( ,
. ... ,
•
. ,
,
scale ro2o0' ,...
..„
, .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by
the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard at Fowler jr.
High School library, 12080 S.W. Main Street9 Tigard, Oregon,
on October 20, 1970 at 8:00 P.M. with respect to the following:
An application by Garfield and Ardath Hubble and
Edwards Industries for a change from A®2
(multi-family residential) to C®4 (neighborhood
commercial) on a 1083 acre parcel of land located
at 14240 S.W. Pacific Highway (Map 2S1 l0A Tax
Lots 400 and 501)
All persons having interest in this matter are invited to attend
and b
a be heard.
III
ii
J. Allan Paterson
CHAIRMAN
I
k
•
( Tigard Planning Comiission .
Staff Report
October 20, 1970
Agenda Item 4-B
Conditional Use
or property described as tax lot 300 in tax map 181 360D .
Applicant
Ella L. Frison . •
Applicant's Request
Conditional-Use approval to facilitate the construction of
two duplexes and ten apartment units on a 0-3, general
commercial, and A-2, multi-family residential, parcel
containing approximately 32,500 square .feet.
Location and Land Use of SubI ct Pro •ert
The vacant—sub ect prope kty s oca ed on the south side of
S.W. Pfaffle Street approximately 600 feet west' of Pacifies
Highway.
Surrounds Zonin and Land Use
The norther y ee of the subject parcel is zoned A-2,
apartment residential and the remaining portion C-3, general
commercial. The C-3 parcels to the south are developed with
two single family dwellings and an eight unit motel. Each
of the abutting lots on the west and east support a single
family residence. A lumber company is located 160 feet to
the east and a 70 unit apartment complex 450 feet to the
i ' northeast.
Applic is Justification
. No wr,. en us cation submitted
Conformance with the Preliminar Co •reh nsive Plan
e pre - m..nary compre ens ve p an r-ea gna. es the subject
property for general commercial development.
Staff Findings and Recommendat 4n.
The staff findings indicate that the subject property relates
topographically to residential development along Pfaffle
Street, and would be more appropriately utilised for multi-
family than commercial development.
Advantages
1. The site is physically oriented to the residential
development along Pfaffle
2. The conditional use will permit the utilisation of a
landlocked C-3 parcel.
s
•
•
ti
Disadvantages •
1. Pfaffle Street does not currently meet the City's •
urban road standard.
It is recommended that the request be approved subject to the
following provisions:
1. That the periphery of the C-3 portion of the subject
property be screened by a 6' fence, landscaped and •
maintained.
2. Drainage plans' shall be approved by the Department
•of Public Works prior to development.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•.
tin
1,2
Pg. 2 Staff Report Pirson Cond...: Use '.a 10/20/70
•
•
•
•
4
(f17411 9C •s „C
91 mi
[L17------ ''' , ,,....____
x x . .. ,
9 co co
PA • s4 �• gm . ��
1 Ei,. ... A ,
. ... , kx\xx ,
i
111A10,"
4
i
QV° ____-I 7
• d . ._____•
• .,
,•„
:.,
r:
il
�i
. 1)1 1
+J �_
.. �-_111
01
CONDITIONAL. USE ``J'
f
area of consideration —N—'
bk. for 2 duplexes i'
scale In = 200'
E P
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held
by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard at Fowler
Jr. High School library, 12080 S.W. Main Street, Tigard,
Oregon, on October 20, 1970 at 8:00 P.M. with respect to the
following:
An application by Ella Lo Prison for a conditional
use for two duplexes in a C-3 (general commercial)
zone on a 0035 acre parcel of land located at 7880
S.W. Pfaffle Street (Map 151 36CD Tax Lot 300)
All persons having interest in this matter are invited to attend
and be heard.
Jo Allan Paterson
CHAIRMAN
0
I`.
li
‘' CHAPTER 156 - COMMERCIAL - PROFESSIONAL C-P
SECTION 156-1 - USES PERMITTED OUTRIGHT
No building structures or land shall be used and no building or
structure shall be hereafter erected, enlarged or altered in this
zone except for the following uses: .
a. Administrative, professional and general office!, including •
offices or organizations engaged in accounting,, architecture,
editing, engineering, insurance, law and realty ,
b. Art Galleries
c. Exhibit halls for commercial and industrial exhibits, provided
however, that there be no sale of stock or material from the
floor, and provided further that there be no warehousing or
storage either within or on the premises
d. Banks, building and loan offices, photographers and artist
studios
e. Biological and medical laboratories, dental and medical offices
and clinics
f. Commercial facilities related and incidental to the uses permitted,
provided however, that there be no display or advertising other
than specifically permitted in Section 156-7
g. General research not involving the manufacture, fabrication and .
processing, or sale of products as listed in any "C" or "M"
district
h. Other non-retail commercial uses found similar to the above ,
by the Planning 1''ommission
SECTION 156-2 - Temporary structures or uses incidental to construe- �+
t tion work which shall be removed upon completion or
1 abandonment of the construction work.
SECTION 156-3 - All business, servicing and research shall be con-
ducted within a compiCCly enclosed building except
off-street parking and loading facilities.
SECTION 156-4 - LOT SIZE •
a. The minimum lot area shall be six thousand (6 000) square feet. .
b. The minimum average lot width shall be sixty (60) feet.
c. The minimum average lot width at the building line shall be
sixty (60) •feet.
d. The minimum lot width at the street shall be sixty (60) feet.
e. The maximum lot coverage shall be 50%.
•
SECTION 156-5 - SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
a. Front Yard
The minimum front yard shall be ten (10) feet, landscaped and
maintained.
.... ...... _
•
Q-P
•
•
b. Side Yard •
No side yard is required in this district unless the property
abuts a residential district, in which case the side yard on
the abutting side shall be 10 feet, landscaped and maintained.
c. Rear Yard
No rear yard is required in this district unless the property
abuts a residential district, in which case the rear yard
shall be ten (10) feet, landscaped and maintained.
d. Half Streets
TH-67EIRTIUE—front 'or side yards or other setbacks as stated
herein, shall be increased where such yard or setback abuts
a street having insufficient right-of-way width to serve the
area. The Planning Commission shall determine .the necessary
right-of-way widths and the additional yard or setback require-
ments in such cases.
SECTION 156-6 . - HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS
a. The maximum height allowed in this district shall be three (3)
stories or forty-five (45) feet. When abutting a single family
residential district the maximum height shall be two gt„2} stories
or thirty (30) feet, whichever is lens.
SECTION 156-7 - SIGNS
a. There shall be not more than one (1) square foot of sign area
for each one hundred (100) square feet of floor area within
the building. The total area of such a sign shall not exceed
fifteen (15) square feet.
b. No sign shall project above the roof line or extend over a •
public sidewalk or right of way. All faces .of signs shall be
parallel to the face of the building upon which said sign is
located and to which the sign pertains.
c. Signs may not be painted, pasted or similarly posted directly
on the surface of any wall.
d. The sign may be lighted with indirect lighting. No neon
(exposed tubing) , plastic (interior illumination), blinker,
flashing or animated signs shall be permitted.
e. No billboards or "incidental use signs" shall be permitted.
f. Free standing signs shall not be permitted in parking lots
or in other areas directly related to public access or to
vision from the street.
SECTION 156-8 - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Additional requirements applicable to this zone include, but
shall not be limited to, the following:
a. Off-street parking and loading - see •Chapter 190. •
b. Access and egress. required - see Chapter 200.
c. Where the boundary of a parking lot adjoins a residential
district, such parking lot shall be screened by a sight- .
obscuring fence. The screening shall be continuous along
1
•
•
0-P
that boundary and shall be at least five (5) feet but not
more than six (6) feet in height. • ,
d. Landscaping required - 20% of the total area shall be landscaped.
.. A signt-obscuring screen or evergreen shrubs shall be planted
along any side abutting a residential zone. .
e. Fire zones see Section 210-10.
f. Nuisances prohibited - see Section 210-5.
g. Air conditioning units, exhaust fans', compressors, or any
other noise-producing equipment, and service entrances,
loading or unloading doors, garbage cans or containers,
shall be so enclosed and baffled that no disturbing sound •
or vibration materially affects adjacent residential properties.
• •
•• •
i
. Yi
i 4
li •
9 .
.
1
• !
li H
•
1
F1
.,
s
•
•
Tigard Planning Commission
Staff Report
October 20, 1970
Agenda' Item 5-A
Sub,_, d� vision Name Mira Park
•
Sponsor Lynn Miller
Q Wilsey and Ham, Inc
Ai Re ue t
Prelim nary, approval of a subdivision plat which proposes to
divide 3.9 acres into 14 residential lots having typical lot
areas of 9,000 square feet.
Location andZon�iing,g
"Tie'propex•ty in question is zoned R-7, single family residential
and is located on the south side of S.W: Park Street (County
Road #1320) and the east side of a proposed extension of
S.W. 1106 Avenue .
Public Utilities
e' of in the subdivision will be served by the Tigard Water
District and Unified Sewerage Agency (City of Tigard
Staff Recommendation approval be granted by
e sta recommends that preliminary app
the Planning Commission provided:
1. that the extension of 1106 Avenue be dedicated and
improved to the standards of the Department of Public
Works.
2. that all drainage easements, proposed paving, catch
basins, hydrants, utility easements be shown on
preliminary plat.
3. that lot dimensions be corrected on preliminary plat.
4. that the strip between lot 5 and Kira Court be included
with the abutting unsubdivided parcel to the north of
lot 5.
5e that development
not be
through 14 u •••". •
xrirt'�;?el�, m�1e?'��'.t'�-��S^.'�74'�:k,�k h �:` �1, � .._� .. .
•
• I
•
Tigard Planning Commission .
Staff Report
October 20, 19 70 •
Agenda. Item 5-B
Subdivision Name Dubury Addition •
Sponsor Iron Mountain Investment Company •
Engineer. • Allan and ,Leuthold, Inc
A licant's Request
re m nary approval of a subdivision plat which proposes to
divide 5.6 acres into 23 duplex lots having typical lot
areas of 8,000 square feet.
Location and �Zon�ing
— e proper yy in question is zoned A-2, multi-family residential
and is located on the west side of the Pacific Highway (99-W)
frontage road, approximately 200 feet north of Bull Mountain
Road. '
Public Utilities
The lots in the subdivision would be served by the Tigard
Water District and Unified Sewerage Agency (City of Tigard).
Staff Recommendation
The staff recommends that the preliminary plat be tabled and
that the applicant revise the plat under a P-R, Planned Res-
idential conditional use, for the following reasons:
1. The westerly 20 feet of the proposed subdivision is
a public right-of-way.
• 2. It is questionable whether or not the roadway can
be vacated because of the creation of 2 non-complying
• lots (landlocked parcels) on the west side of the
existing right-of-way.
3. If the preliminary plat is approved, even for those
lots not abutting the existing right-of-way, the
possibility of having three parallel streets in
proximity to one another is eminent.
4. A revised preliminary plat with P-R, Planned Residential
approval' would allow the utilization of the existing
right-of-way and a system of private courts.
5. The current preliminary plat calls for 850 feet of street .
length terminating in a cul-de-sac, less than 500 feet
from S.W. Gaarde Street. The standard maximum cul-de-sac
street length in order to maintain public safety is 600
. feet. Under a planned development the street can be
extended through to Gaarde Street and still maintain
privacy and minimum traffic movement.