Planning Commission Packet - 08/08/1967 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
. f
�
TIGARD PLANNING ANA ZONING COMb1ISSION ;
F
i
Public Hearing, Tuesday, Augu�t 8, 1967 7:30 P.M.
F�eld at Fowler Jr. High ;
}
� A public hearing with reapaet to the propoaed Siqn Code for the C9.ty !
of Tigard, j
i
Roll Call: Presenr Jack Annand, E.�ton Phillipa, Alan Paterson, Members�t +
Jnhn Perry, Cha�ixman; Keith Thompeon, Ci�ty Engineex. !
k
Absent Jim A3tkin, Clarence Nicoli, Everett Severaon, '
Membe�ra�; Fred Andazeon, City Attprney. ;
.f
It wae moved by .7a�k Annend, Seconded by Mr. Phillips that the propoaed 1
Sign Code be returned to s committee for further atudy and that the �
commiasion hold an additionesl p'ublic h�aring before reaommending the
propoaed Sign Code to the City �ouncil. ;
3
Motion �tpproved by unani.moua vote oE Commiesion presont, i
i
Public Hearing: Approximately 67 permons in attendsnae. i
The following person� teetified in the public hearing.
l. Edgar Wamath, Waetern Oil and Gas Corpor�itian m�de the following
comments: F3.n aigne ahould be added to the definition eection;
sect3on 203 A ehould be �l��i,f3ed; Section 302 A ahauld read - �
Pexmitted Di�splay of F2ego, Bannere, etc.; F1ac�s, Bannere, etc.
should be pesmittad for � fi�teen day period; paragraph 1 in
Seetion 307 E should be eliminated; Section 307 T, Ratating
signe ahould be allowed.
2. Del Ball, r�preeea�ting merchante irn Tigazd, recommended that a
committee of 2 merchmnte rand 2 gereons from a Sign Company work
with the Pla►nning Commisaion to reviee the Sign Code. The two
areas that shauld be consid�red in the sign code wo�ld be
structural �afety and psotecti�on for out-of-balance signe. He
stated that the wording in Section 411 (ahall be deemed guilt�
of a miademeanor) �rhould be deleted.
3. Joyce Ballard stated that the Sign Code would hurt the buaineaa
in Tigard.
4. Dorsey Olds �stated that a committee oE citizens should ba set
up to work with th�e Planning Commieaion.
5. Al Woode, representing Dlectrical Advertiaing Companies, dieagreecl
with the sectione on flaehing aigne, rotating eigne, roof signs,
� and projecting aidewalk aigns.
6. Don Stephens agreed wit� A1 Woods on the sections referring to
flashing eigns, etc.
Page 1 8/8/'67
M
7. Babe Hess, Lone 0ak Reataurant, felt that flashing �nd swinging
signs should be allowed.
8, Doug Murray, Oregon Sign and Neon Corporation did not a�ree with
� the following sectiona: 203 2A, 203 2C, 203 3R, 203 4; Roof, tx�t,
and flashing signs should be permitted.
9. A letter was preaented by the ahairman, John Perry, from Ro_qe.r
Emmons, Oregon Co�ancil of outdnor Advextising, which c�ave '
sevsral amendments he felt would be beneficial to the praposed
Sign Codeo
lU. Mr. Del Ball mentioned a letter �ent to the City k±,dnixzi:i.�*'��`-�•�r�
by Mtr. Donnreis stating the feelinga of the merch�ra'cs raE °���,�;z�a:,:.�s
11. Bruce Hollister felt that the Planning Commissa.on s'�n?alc� rc��t �
assume the reaponsibility of deciding whieh aigna are �o be �
conaidered beautiful and whi.ch are nqt, I
.�
Hearing clos•ed: 9:10 P.M� i
j
,
� � P
�
�
!
�
�
f
�
0
��
� � x�
�
i
r
�
�'I
�
�
a
p
z1
��
� � � �
j
i
F
� i
�
i
Page 2 8/8/67 �
{
�
�
- i
t
1
� � � . ' A . - __ _ `