City Council Packet - 01/20/2015 • City of Tigard
TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda
•
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE AND TIME: January 20,2015 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Times noted are estimated.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for
Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext. 2410
(voice) or 503-684-2772 (MD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead
time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by
calling: 503-639-4171,ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (MD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE:
h ttp://live.ti gard-or.eov
Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows:
Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28
•Every Sunday at 12 a.m.
•Every Monday at 1 p.m.
•Every Thursday at 12 p.m.
•Every Friday at 10:30 a.m.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
• City of Tigard
TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda
m
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE AND TIME: January 20,2015 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
6:30 PM
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
A. Call to Order- City Council
B. Roll Call
C. Pledge of Allegiance
D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. BUDGET COMMI'1"1'FE SECOND QUARTER REPORT- 6:40 p.m.estimated time
3. UPDATE ON THE TIGARD STREET TRAIL DESIGN CONCEPTS - 7:25 p.m.estimated time
4. REVIEW OF THE CITY COUNCIL'S 2015/2016 FY BUDGET-7:55 p.m.estimated time
5. DISCUSSION ON PACIFIC HIGHWAY-8:15 p.m.estimated time
6. NON AGENDA ITEMS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive
Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable
statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS
192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for
the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to
the public.
8. ADJOURNMENT- 8:45 p.m.estimated time
AIS-1890 2.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 01/20/2015
Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes
Agenda Title: Second Quarter Budget Committee Meeting
Prepared For: Toby LaFrance
Submitted By: Carissa Collins, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Budget Committee Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
This meeting is to inform the Budget Committee of the city's financial status for the second
quarter of FY 2015.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
No action required. Staff will be presenting a status report.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The FY 2015 City Budget was approved by the Budget Committee on April 28, 2014. The
budget was adopted by City Council with some technical adjustments on June 10, 2014.
At this meeting, staff will provide the following:
•An update on the close of fiscal year 2014 audit.
•Present the second quarter financial report for FY 2015.
•Preview the second quarter supplemental budget request scheduled for hearing on
January 27, 2015.
•Review important dates on the budget calendar for FY 2016
•Review initial forecast for General Fund and various capital funds.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES •
N/A
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
City of Tigard Budget Committee First Quarter FY 2015 meeting was on October 21, 2014.
Attachments
Agenda
Forecast Cover Memo
Initial General Fund Forecast
Initial Capital Fund Forecast Summary
11111 .
City of Tigard
TIGARD Budget Committee Agenda
MEETING DATE/TIME: January 20,2015,6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard Town Hall
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard
City of Tigard Budget Committee Meeting
• Call to order
FY14
• Audit-Debbie
FY15
• Q2 Financial Report-Toby
• Q2 Supplemental information-Toby/Carissa
FY16
• Calendar-Carissa
• Initial forecast and budget instructions to departments
Summary of Findings
Follow-Up from Prior Quarterly Report of the Fiscal Year
• Development Revenues-building activity
BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA—January 20, 2015
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1
71111 NI
City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: Budget Committee
From: Toby LaFrance, Finance and Information Service Director
Re: Initial Forecast for FY 2016-2021
Date: January 7, 2015
Finance met and collaborated with staff from Public Works, Community Development and
Police to begin preparation of the six-year financial forecast. Attached to this memo is the
resulting General Fund Forecast and a summary of funding available for capital projects.
Some of the key assumptions impacting the forecast are discussed below. The result is a
General Fund forecast that, after spending down reserves for the City Hall exterior repairs, still
shows annual expenditures growing at 4.0%while revenues continue to grow at a modest 3.5%.
Fund balance is relatively steady at $9.5-$10.0 million. The forecast shows that we can continue
to afford existing operational levels and select one-time expenditures, but there is essentially no
room for new ongoing expenses without offsetting revenues or expenditure reductions.
The capital funds are quite limited. For each of the capital funds, Finance has identified a target
reserve. The target is based on the following potential factors:
• Sufficient balance to ensure a positive cash position in funds where either expenditures or
revenues do not occur in an even manner (e.g. General Fund where expenses are steady but
Property Tax does not come until November or Street Maintenance where the bulk of the
expenses occur in the first three months)
• Six months of operations (e.g. utility funds, Gas Tax),
• One year of debt service (e.g. Gas Tax and City Gas Tax),
• Three to six months of revenue (e.g. Transportation Development Tax, Parks SDC).
Overall,Tigard's capital funds are limited. In the area of transportation, both the Gas Tax and
City Gas Tax reserves are under their targets due to recent large capital projects. The
Transportation Development Tax is healthy,but will be needed as River Terrace develops.
Tigard will be able to continue the Pavement Management Program funded by the Street
Maintenance Fee. Parks have very limited funding with the Parks Bond being mostly spent.
The bulk of the available funding is in the form of General Fund reserves,where parks will have
to compete with the rest of the city. Utilities are generally health,with the exception of Sewer
where there are insufficient resources to perform needed capital projects after paying for
operations.
The citywide assumption for Tigard is that economic conditions show moderate growth. The
base condition that was used for determining revenues for Planning and Building revolves
around River Terrace. The River Terrace Community Plan is completed by the middle of FY
2015 for Planning, and Building can start at the end of FY 2016. For Planning, there is expected
to be an increase over two fiscal years,held for another fiscal year, and then a decline,but to a
level that is higher than the starting point of FY 2015.
Some key points regarding the assumptions used for creating the initial forecast are as follows:
• Property taxes for FY15 grew by 4.4%vs a budget assumption of 3.0%. This is the second
year of assessed value growth over 3%. The forecast assumes annual growth of 3.75% -
4.0%. River Terrace will start impacting assessed value and property taxes starting FY2019,
which is when the growth rate jumps from 3.75% to 4.0%. This additional 0.25% equates to
approximately$35-$40K per year from 70 homes annually which is at the low end of the
forecasted annual building rate.
• The cost for the Engineering division was budgeted with an 84% rate of reimbursement to
the General Fund. This amount has been reduced to 75% to reflect the division's actual rate
of return.
• The forecast includes an estimated$150,000 for the TPOA contract.
• Also, the FY 2015 budget revenues for traffic fines and library fines were significantly higher
than what was actually collected in FY 2014. As a result, the forecast for these items were
based off of FY 2014 actuals.
• The revenue growth from WCCLS is forecasted at 2%. This may change as we learn more
about the next levy.
• Finally, there are 27 pay periods that will need to be budgeted for in FY 2016.
General Fund Forecast
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Annual Expenditures 28,590,000 27,070,000 28,590,000 31,050,000 32,410,000 31,760,000 32,960,000 34,250,000 35,430,000 36,830,000
Annual Revenues 28,510,000 29,510,000 30,240,000 30,400,000 31,130,000 32,030,000 33,100,000 34,180,000 35,390,000 36,650,000
Required EFB for Next Year 6,550,000 6,130,000 6,680,000 7,490,000 7,340,000 7,620,000 7,920,000 8,190,000 8,520,000 8,520,000
Ending Fund Balance 7,250,000 9,690,000 11,350,000 10,710,000 9,430,000 9,700,000 9,840,000 9,770,000 9,730,000 9,550,000
General Fund Forecast
Initial
40,000,000
35,000 000
30,000,000 ---
I
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000 IN _IIIII NM! mom
5,000,000 1 i —i
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
IMIM Ending Fund Balance Annual Expenditures ------Annual Revenues Required EFB for Next Year
1/7/2015 4:52 PM 100-General Fund w_Q1.xlsx Graph- Initial
FY 2016 Funds Status Summary
Transportation, Parks,and Utility Funds
Targeted Available funding per FY
Fund Reserve($) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 6-YrTotal
Transportation
Gas Tax $ 1,700,000 $ (510,000) $ 490,000 $ 460,000 $ 450,000 $ 480,000 $ 1,040,000 $ 2,410,000
City Gas Tax $ 320,000 $ (220,000) $ 380,000 $ 390,000 $ 410,000 $ 430,000 $ 740,000 $ 2,130,000
Transportation Dev Tax $ 400,000 $ 970,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,680,000 $ 1,670,000 $ 1,680,000 $ 1,680,000 $ 8,980,000
Street Maintenance $ 1,400,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 1,980,000 $ 2,090,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,330,000 $ 2,450,000 $ 12,880,000
Underground Utility Fee $ 50,000 $ 430,000 $ 100,000 $ 110,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 110,000 $ 950,000
Subtotal $ 2,500,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 4,730,000 $ 4,830,000 $ 5,020,000 $ 6,020,000 $ 27,350,000
Parks
Urban Forestry $ 30,000 $ 1,130,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 1,280,000
Parks Bond $ - $ 110,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110,000
General Fund $ 7,490,000 $ 1,940,000 $ 270,000 $ 140,000 $ (70,000) $ (40,000) $ (180,000) $ 2,060,000
Parks SDC $ 350,000 $ 800,000 $ 710,000 $ 710,000 $ 710,000 $ 720,000 $ 710,000 $ 4,360,000
Subtotal $ 3,980,000 $ 1,010,000 $ 880,000 $ 670,000 $ 710,000 $ 560,000 $ 7,810,000
Utilities
Sanitary Sewer $ 1,000,000 $ 3,460,000 $ 450,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 520,000 $ 500,000 $ 5,930,000
Stormwater $ 850,000 $ 3,830,000 $ 970,000 $ 1,010,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 980,000 $ 950,000 $ 8,740,000
Water Quality/Quantity $ 20,000 $ 820,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 900,000
Water $ 6,000,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 3,660,000 $ 4,090,000 $ 4,490,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,220,000 $ 26,540,000
Water SDC $ 500,000 $ 4,770,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,740,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 13,510,000
Subtotal $ 16,960,000 $ 6,850,000 $ 7,360,000 $ 7,750,000 $ 8,260,000 $ 8,440,000 $ 55,620,000
Assumptions
Gas Tax Targeted reserve based on 6 months of operations plus debt service payments where applicable. Bond payments end FY20.
City Gas Tax Reserve based on annual debt service payment. Accounts for$400K for McGaarde in FY16. Bond payments end FY20.
Street Maintenance Targeted reserve based on 75%of program cost since majority of program costs are in the first 3 month of FY.
Sanitary Sewer Targeted reserve based on 6 months of operations.
Stormwater Targeted reserve based on 6 months of operations.
Water Targeted reserve based on 6 months of operations plus$2M for Rate Stabilization Account. Accounts for LOTWP.
Water SDC and TDT Revenues based on River Terrace Financing Plan
General Fund Targeted Reserve based on reserve needed to pay expenses until Property Tax collection in Nov.Accounts for The Wrap
All Funds River Terrace revenues from Finance Plan are included but capital expenses are not taken into account.
All Funds Based on initial forecasts as of 12/31/2014.
Forecasts and available funds subject to change as city progresses thru budget process.
I:\FIN\Budget 16\Financial Forecasts\Initial\CIP_Funding_FY16.xlsx Report Date:1/7/2015
City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: City Council & Budget Committee
From: Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst
Re: FY 2015 Second Quarter Supplemental
Date: January 15, 2015
On January 20, 2015, Budget Committee will be briefed on the FY
2015 second quarter supplemental to the FY 2015 Budget. Attached
is the Exhibit A detailing the items to be considered. City Council
will take action on these items at the budget hearing scheduled for
January 27, 2015.
If you have any questions and would like to discuss them prior to the
hearing, please feel free to contact either myself or Toby LaFrance. I
can be reached at 503-718-2643 or carissa @tigard-or.gov.
Toby can be reached at 503-718-2406 or toby @ tigard-or.gov.
Thank you.
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
1.TPOA Contract Negotiations-Police
An additional appropriation of$150,000 is required to pay for police salary and overtime increases
resulting from the October contract negotiations.This action will result in a decrease in General Fund
contingency by$150,000 with an equal increase in Community Services program expenditures.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 5,718,600
Charges for Services $ 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 $ 55,873
Other Financing Sources $ 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers In from Other Funds S - S
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ $40,388,013
Requirements
Community Development S 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services S 21,525,260 $ 150,000 $ 21,675,260
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works $ 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
_ Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 150,000 $ 31,458,073
Debt Service S - $ -
Loans S - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 $ 254,000
"Transfers to Other Funds $ 879,467 $ 879,467
Contingency_ S 1,250,202 $ (150,000 $ 1,100,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ - $ 33,691,742
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ - $ 40,388,013
Page 1 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
2.Metro Position Reduction-Police
Periodically,the Police Department re-evaluates all outsourced positions to ensure that the needs of the City
and Department continue to be met.At this time,Tigard PD has determined that one detective position
with Metro,rather than two,strikes the right balance.In order to accommodate this change,the Department
is eliminating a vacant position in another division and recognizing the reduction in future funding from Metro.
The detective currently with Metro will resume patrol duties in mid January.As a result,intergovernmental
revenues within General Fund will decrease by$51,347 along with an equal decrease in Community Services
program expenditures.In addition,total fFE in Community Services will decrease by 1.0.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees S 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits S 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental S 5,718,600 $ (51,347) $ 5,667,253
Charges for Services S 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures S 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 $ 55,873
Other Financing Sources $ 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers In from Other Funds -
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ 5 347 $ 40,336,666
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services S 21,525,260 $ (51,347) $ 21,473,913
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
l'ublic Works $ 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ (51,347) $ 31,256,726
Debt Service S - $ -
Loans S - $ -
Work-In-Progress S 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds S 879,467 $ 879,467
Contingency S 1,250,202 S 1,250,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ (51,347) $ 33,640,395
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ (51,347) $ 40,336,666
Page 2 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
3.Insurance Payment-Police
The city received an insurance check in the amount of$15,616 for damages associated
with vehicle 14-826 that was involved in an accident.This will show an increase in
intergovernmental revenues of$15,616 with an equal increase in Community Services
program expenditures.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 15,616 $ 5,734,216
Charges for Services $ 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 S 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 S 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 $ 55,873
Other Financing Sources S 254,000 S 254,000
Transfers in from Other Funds S - -
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ 15,616 $ 40,403,629
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services S 21,525,260 $ 15,616 $ 21,540,876
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works $ 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 15,616 $ 31,323,689
Debt Service - S -
Loans - S -
Work-In-Progress S 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds $ 879,467 3 879,467
Contingency $ 1,250,202 S 1,250,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ 15,616 $ 33,707,358
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ 15,616 $ 40,403,629
Page 3 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
4.Police Canine-Police
A total of$15,000 in donations has been received from the Tigard Rotary as well as private donations
to purchase a second dog for the city's K-9 unit.This action will show an increase in Miscellaneous items
by$15,000 with an equal increase in program expenditures for Community Services.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 5,718,600
Charges for Services $ 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 $ 15,000 $ 70,873
Other Financing Sources $ 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers In from Other Funds S - S -
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ 15,000 $ 40,403,013
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services $ 21,525,260 $ 15,000 $ 21,540,260
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works $ 5,881,563 S 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 15,000 $ 31,323073_
Debt Service - $ -
Loans - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 S 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds $ 879,467 S 879,467
Contingency S 1,250,202 S 1,250,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ 15,000 $ 33,706,742
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ 15,000 $ 40,403,013
Page 4 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
5.Overtime-Police
A total of$16,582 is being recognized to be used for the following.
*Holiday traffic control at Washington Square Mall for$10,782.
*Distracted Driver Diversion class in the amount of$5,800.
This will result in an increase in Intergovernmental Revenues by$10,782 and Charges for Services
of$5,800.In turn,Community Set-vices program expenditures will increase by$16,582.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 10,782 $ 5,729,382
Charges for Services S 2,688,234 $ 5,800 $ 2,694,034
Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous S 55,873 S 55,873
Other Financing Sources S 254,000 5 254,000
Transfers In from Other Funds S S -
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ 16,582 $ 40,404,595
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services S 21,525,260 $ 16,582 $ 21,541,842
Policy&Administration S 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works S 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 16,582 $ 31,324,655
Debt Service S - S -
I.cans S $ -
Work-In-Progress S 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds $ 879,467 $ 879,467
Contingency $ 1,250,202 $ 1,250,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ 16,582 $ 33,708,324
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ 16,582 $ 40,404,595
Page 5 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
6.Radio Equipment-Police
The city received a total of$11,500 from the sale of old police radios.This revenue will be used to
purchase newer radios in PD.This action will result in an increase in Other Financing Sources by$11,500.
In turn,program expenditures in Community Services will increase by the same amount.
QI Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property faxes $ 13,404,815 S 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 S 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 S 5,718,600
Charges for Services $ 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous 5 55,873 $ 55,873
Other Financing Sources $ 254,000 $ 11,500 S 265,500
Transfers In from Other Funds S - S -
Total Resources $ 40 88 013 $ 11,500 $ 40,399,513
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services $ 21,525,260 $ 11,500 $ 21,536,760
Policy&Administration S 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works S 5,881,563 S 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 11,500 $ 31,319,573
Debt Service S - S -
Loans S - S -
Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 S 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds $ 879,467 S 879,467
Contingency S 1,25.0,202 _ S 1,250,202
Total Budget $ 33,694742 $ 11,500 $ 33,703,242
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ 11,500 $ 40,399,513
Page 6 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
7.Draft Environmental Impact Study-Community Development
A request in the amount of 5185,000 is required to pay for the city's share of the development of the
Draft Environmental Impact Study in partnership with Metro as part of the Southwest Cooridor Plan.
This action will result in a decrease in General Fund contingency by$185,000 with an equal increase in
Community Development program expenditures.
Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes S 13,404,815 S 13,404,815
Franchise Fees S 5,799,632 S 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits S 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 5,718,600
Charges for Services $ 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Pines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 S 55,873
Other Financing Sources $ 254,000 $ 254,000
Transtur, In from Other Funds S - S -
Total Resources $ 40,388,013 $ - $ 40,388,013
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 185,000 $ 3,232,095
Community Services $ 21,525,260 $ 21,525,260
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works $ 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ 185,000 $ 31,493,073
Debt Service - 5 -
Loans S - S -
Work-In-Progress S 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds S 879,467 $ 879,467
Contingency S 1,250,202 S (185,000) $ 1,065,202
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ - $ 33,691,742
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ - $ 40,388,013
Page 7 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
8.Property Lease Agreement-Public Works
A total of$72,500 is required to move Public Works staff to a new site as part of the relocation of the
dog park.Of that amount,a total of$24,500 is being used to pay for a six month property lease along
with$48,000 that is needed for minor tenant improvements including interior painting floor repair;
city intranet and phones,and an emergency communication system.This action will show a decrease in
General Fund contingency of$9,425;a decrease Gas lax contingency by$41,325;and a decrease in
Property Management contingency by$21,750.Program expenditures within Fleet/Property Management
will increase by$72,500.
Fund l of 3 Ql Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
General Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493
Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815
Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632
Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412
Intergovernmental $ 5,718,600 $ 5,718,600
Charges for Services S 2,688,234 $ 2,688,234
Fines&Forfeitures S 993,232 $ 993,232
Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722
Miscellaneous $ 55,873 $ 55,873
Other Financing Sources 5 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers In from Other Funds -
Total Resources $ 40,388 013 $ - $ 40,388 013
Requirements
Community Development $ 3,047,095 $ 3,047,095
Community Services $ 21,525,260 $ 21,525,260
Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ 854,155
Public Works S 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563
Program Expenditures Total $ 31,308,073 $ - $ 31,308,073
Debt Service S - $ -
Loans $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 $ 254,000
Transfers to Other Funds S 879,467 $ 9,425 $ 888,892
Contingency $ 1,250,202 $ (9,425) S 1,240,777
Total Budget $ 33,691,742 $ - $ 33,691,742
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271
Total Requirements $ 40,388,013 $ - $ 40,388,013
Page 8 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
8.Property Lease Agreement-Public Works
A total of$72,500 is required to move Public Works staff to a new site as part of the relocation of the
dog park.Of that amount,a total of$24,500 is being used to pay for a six month property lease along
with$48,000 that is needed for minor tenant improvements including interior painting,floor repair;
city Intranet and phones,and an emergency communication system.This action will show a decrease in
General Fund contingency of$9,425;a decrease Gas Tax contingency by$41,325;and a decrease in
Property Management contingency by$21,750.Program expenditures within Fleet/Property Management
will increase by$72,500.
Fund 2 of 3 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Gas Tax Fund
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance $ 571,900 $ - $ 571,900
Property Taxes -
Franchise Fees $ - $ -
Licenses&Permits $ 225 $ 225
Intergovernmental $ 2,990,443 $ 2990,443
Charges for Services $ - $ -
Fines&Forfeitures S - $ -
Interest Earnings S 55,732 $ 55,732
Miscellaneous S 61,345 $ 61,345
Other Financing Sources -
Transfers In from Other Funds S 100,00(1 S I00,110()
Total Resources $ 3,779,645 $ - $ 3,779,645
Requirements
Community Development S - S -
Community Services S $ -
Policy&Administration -
Public Works S 2,203,002 S 2,205,002
Program Expenditures Total $ 2,205,002 $ - $ 2,205,002
Debt Service $ 599,676 S 599,676
Loans $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ - $ -
Transfers to Other Funds $ 907,023 S 41,325 $ 948,348
Contingency $ 57,610 $ (41,325) $ 16,285
Total Budget $ 3,769,311 $ - $ 3,769,311
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 10,334 $ - $ 10,334
Total Requirements $ 3,779,645 $ - $ 3,779,645
Page 9 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
8.Property Lease Agreement-Public Works
A total of$72,500 is required to move Public Works staff to a new site as part of the relocation of the
dog park.Of that amount,a total of$24,500 is being used to pay for a six month property lease along
with$48,000 that is needed for minor tenant improvements including interior painting;floor repair;
city intranet and phones,and an emergency communication system.This action will show a decrease in
General Fund contingency of$9,425;a decrease Gas Tax contingency by$41,325;and a decrease in
Property Management contingency by$21,750.Program expenditures within Fleet/Property Management
will increase by$72,500.
Fund 3 of 3 Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Fleet/Property Management Fund
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance $ 60,269 $ - $ 60,269
Property Taxes S $ -
Franchise Fees -
Licenses&Permits S - $ -
Intergovernmental S - S -
Charges for Services $ 1,646,995 $ 1,646,995
Fines&Forfeitures S - $ -
Interest Earnings S - $ -
Miscellaneous S 29,392 S 29,392
Other Financing Sources S - S -
Transfers In from Other Funds c - S 50,750 S 50,,50
Total Resources $ 1,736,656 $ 50,750 $ 1,787,406
Requirements
Community Development $ - S -
Community Services S - $ -
Policy&Administration S - $ -
Public Works S 1,650,805 S 72,500 $ 1,723,305
Program Expenditures Total $ 1,650,805 $ 72,500 $ 1,723,305
Debt Service
Loans S - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ - S -
Transfers to Other Funds S - S -
Contingency S 75,000 $ (21,750) $ 53,250
Total Budget $ 1,725,805 $ 50,750 $ 1,776,555
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 10,851 $ - $ 10,851
Total Requirements $ 1,736,656 $ 50,750 $ 1,787,406
Page 10 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
9.Grant Recognition-Finance&Information Services
The city has received two grants totaling$58,464 from the Metropolitan Area Communication Commission.
One grant in the amount of$18,464 will be used to replace the city's existing firewall.The other grant,
totaling$40,000 will be used to purchase a second backup system for the Police Department.
This action will result in an increase in Central Services intergovernmental revenues by$58,464 with an
equal increase in program expenditures in Policy and Administration.
Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Central Services Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 417,867 $ 417,867
Property Taxes S - S -
Franchise Fees $ - S -
Licenses&Permits $ 32,569 $ 32,569
Intergovernmental $ - $ 58,464 $ 58,464
Charges for Services $ 6,490,581 $ 6,490,581
Fines&Forfeitures $ - $ -
Interest Earnings S 593 $ 593
Miscellaneous $ 12,277 $ 12,277
Other Financing Sources - S -
'Transfers In from Other Funds S 224,963 121,963
Total Resources $ 7,178,850 $ 58,464 $ 7,237,314
Requirements
Policy and Administration $ 7,073,038 S 58,464 S 7,131,502
Program Expenditures Total $ 7,073,038 $ 58,464 $ 7,131,502
Contingency S 100,000 $ 100,000
Total Budget $ 7,173,038 $ 58,464 $ 7,231,502
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 5,812 $ - $ 5,812
Total Requirements $ 7,178,850 $ 58,464 $ 7,237,314
Page 11 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
10.Replacement Vehicles-Utility Billing
A total of$69,000 is being requested in order to replace the city's meter reading fleet of vehicles with
three small trucks that are more dependable and have lower maintenance costs.As a result,Sanitary Sewer
contingency will decrease by$26,910;and Water contingency will decrease by$42,090.
"Transfers will increase.Program expenditures within Policy&Administration will increase by$69,000.
Fund 1 of 3 Qi Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Sanitary Sewer Fund
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,618,778_ _ $ 4,618,778
Property Taxes S - $ -
Franchise Fees S - $ -
Licenses&Permits S 587,133 $ 587,133
Intergovernmental -
Charges for Services S 1,584,277 $ 1,584,277
Fines&Forfeitures S - $ -
Interest Earnings S 100,333 $ 100,333
Miscellaneous S 141,674 $ 141,674
Other Financing Sources S - S -
Transfers In from Other Funds S I.;69,900 S 1,369,900
Total Resources $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095
Requirements
Policy and Administration $ S -
Community Development $ - $ -
Community Services $ - $ -
Public Works S 1,974,545 5 1,974,545
Program Expenditures Total $ 1,974,545 $ - $ 1,974,545
Debt Service -
Loans S - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 2,996,061 $ 2,996,061
Transfers to Other Funds $ 79,849 $ 26,910 $ 106,759
Contingency 5 371,715 S (26,910) $ 344,805
Total Budget $ 5,422,170 $ - $ 5,422,170
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,979,925 $ - $ 2,979,925
Total Requirements $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095
Page 12 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
10.Replacement Vehicles-Utility Billing
A total of$69,000 is being requested in order to replace the city's meter reading fleet of vehicles with
three small trucks that are more dependable and have lower maintenance costs.As a result,Sanitary Sewer
contingency will decrease by$26,910;and Water contingency will decrease by$42,090.
Transfers will increase.Program expenditures within Policy&Administration will increase by$69,000.
Fund 2 of 3 Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Water Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 16,125,957 $ 16,125,957
Property Taxes S - $ -
Franchise Fees S - S -
Licenses&Permits S 14,400 $ 14,400
Intergovernmental $ - $ -
Charges for Services S 16,708,280 $ 16,708,280
Fines&Forfeitures S - $ -
Interest Earnings S 30,644 $ 30,644
Miscellaneous S 10,825 $ 10,825
Other Financing Sources S - $ -
Transfers In from Other Funds S 58,751 $ 58,751
Total Resources $ 32,948,857 $ - $ 32,948,857
Requirements
Public Works S 8,376,282 5 8,376,282
Program Expenditures Total $ 8,376,282 $ - $ 8,376,282
Transfers to Other Funds $ 5,767,077 $ 42,090 $ 5,809,167
Contingency $ 500,000 $ (42,090) $ 457,910
Total Budget $ 14,643,359 $ - $ 14,643,359
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 18,305,498 $ - $ 18,305,498
Total Requirements $ 32,948,857 $ - $ 32,948,857
Page 13 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
10.Replacement Vehicles-Utility Billing
A total of$69,000 is being requested in order to replace the city's meter reading fleet of vehicles with
three small trucks that are more dependable and have lower maintenance costs.As a result,Sanitary Sewer
contingency will decrease by$26,910;and Water contingency will decrease by$42,090.
Transfers will increase.Program expenditures within Policy&Administration will increase by$69,000.
Fund 3 of 3 Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Central Services Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 417,867 $ 417,867
Property Taxes S - S -
Franchise Fees S S -
Licenses&Permits $ 32,569 $ 32,569
Intergovernmental S - $ -
Charges for Services S 6,490,581 $ 6,490,581
Fines&Forfeitures 5 - $ -
Interest Earnings S 593 $ 593
Miscellaneous $ 12,277 $ 12,277
Other Financing Sources $ - $ -
1'ransfers In from Other Funds S 224,963 S 69,000 S 293,963
Total Resources $ 7,178,850 $ 69,000 $ 7,247,850
Requirements
Policy and Administration S 7,073,038 S 69,000 $ 7,142,038
Program Expenditures Total $ 7,073,038 $ 69,000 $ 7,142,038
Contingency S 100,000 S 100,000
Total Budget $ 7,173,038 $ 69,000 $ 7,242,038
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 5,812 $ - $ 5,812
Total Requirements $ 7,178,850 $ 69,000 $ 7,247,850
Page 14 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
11.Water Rates Notices-Utility Billing
A total of$5,500 is required to pay for printing and mailing costs associated with the notification
of customers regarding increased water rates beginning January 1,2015.As a result,Water
contingency will decrease by$5,500 with an increase in transfers.Program expenditures increase
in Policy and Administration will increase by the same amount.
Q2
Fund 1 of 2 Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Water Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 16,125,957 $ 16,125,957
Property Taxes $ - $ -
Franchise Fees - $ -
Licenses&Permits S 14,400 $ 14,400
Intergovernmental - $ -
Charges for Services S 16,708,280 $ 16,708,280
Fines&Forfeitures - $ -
Interest Earnings S 30,644 $ 30,644
Miscellaneous $ 10,825 $ 10,825
Other Financing Sources S - $ -
Transfers In from Other Funds S 58,751 $ 58,751
Total Resources $ 32,948,857
Requirements
Public Works $ 8,376,282 5 8,376,282
Program Expenditures Total $ 8,376,282 $ - $ 8,376,282
Transfers to Other Funds $ 5,767,077 $ 5,500 S 5,772,577
Contingency S 500,000 S (5,500) S 494,500
Total Budget $ 14,643,359 $ - $ 14,643,359
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 18,305,498 $ - $ 18,305,498
Total Requirements $ 32,948,857 $ - $ 32,948,857
Page 15 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
11.Water Rates Notices-Utility Billing
A total of$5,500 is required to pay for printing and mailing costs associated with the notification
of customers regarding increased water rates beginning January 1,2015.As a result,Water
contingency will decrease by$5,500 with an increase in transfers.Program expenditures increase
in Policy and Administration will increase by the same amount.
Fund 2 of 2 Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Central Services Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 417,867 $ 417,867
Property Taxes - $ -
Franchise Fees - $ -
Licenses&Permits $ 32,569 $ 32,569
IntergovernmentalS - $ -
Charges for Services S 6,490,581 $ 6,490,581
Fines&Forfeitures - $ -
Interest Earnings $ 593 $ 593
Miscellaneous S 12,277 $ 12,277
Other Financing Sources - $ -
Transfers In from Other Funds S 224,963 S 5,500 S 230,463
Total Resources $ 7,178,850 $ 5,500 $ 7,184,350
Requirements
Policy and Administration $ 7,073,038 $ 5,500 S 7,078,538
Program Expenditures Total $ 7,073,038 $ 5,500 $ 7,078,538
Contingency S 100,000 S 100,000
Total Budget $ 7,173,038 $ 5,500 $ 7,178,538
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 5,812 $ - $ 5,812
Total Requirements $ 7,178,850 $ 5,500 $ 7,184,350
Page 16 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
12,Facilities Strategies Plan-Capital Improvement Program(CIP)
A request in the amount of$300,000 is being made in order to pay for the development of a
facilities strategic plan.The plan is expected to provide a holistic view of the city's operational
needs and placement of facilities within a 20-year timeframe.
This action will result in a decrease in reserve for future expenditure by$300,000 in
the General Capital Facilities Fund with an equal increase in capital program expenditures.
Q2
Adopted Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Gen'l Capital Facilities Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 878,435 $ 878,435
Interest Earnings S 3,212 $ 3,212
Transfers In from Other Funds S 1,031,891 S 1,031,891
Total Resources $ 1,913,538 $ - $ 1,913,538
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 674,900 $ 300,000 S 974,900
Transfers to Other Funds 5 8,742 $ 8,742
Contingency S 50,000 S 50,000
Total Budget $ 733,642 $ 300,000 $ 1,033,642
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 1,179,896 $ (300,000) $ 879,896
Total Requirements $ 1,913,538 $ - $ 1,913,538
Page 17 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
13.Capital Improvement Program-Duksen Nature Park
A total of$194,000 is being requested to for development of the park.Of this total,$178,000 is
a carryover that will be used to complete the design,as well as begin construction modifications
to the Tualatin River Keepers education center and some soft paths.In addition,the city has
received a grant in the amount of$16,000 from the Department of Environmental Quality for
the purchase and installation of 8,000 native wet meadow wildflowers in the park.This action will
show an increase in the Park Bond Fund beginning fund balance of$178,000 with an increase in
transfers.In addition,Parks Capital Fund will show an increase in intergovernmental revenues
in the amount of$16,000 with an increase in capital program expenditures of$194,000.
Fund 1 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Parks Bond Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,293,068 $ 178,000 $ 2,471,068
Interest Earnings I,n20 S 4,020
Total Resources $ 2,297,088 $ 178,000 $ 2,475,088
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Transfers to Other Funds $ 2,099,143 $ 178,000 S 2,277,143
Contingency S - S -
Total Budget $ 2,099,143 $ 178,000 $ 2,277,143
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 197,945 $ - $ 197,945
Total Requirements $ 2,297,088 $ 178,000 $ 2,475,088
Fund 2 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Parks Capital Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 174,509 $ 174,509
Intergovernmental $ 41,506 $ 16,000 $ 57,506
Interest Earnings S 3,015 $ 3,015
Transfers In from Other Funds S 3,192,834 S 178,000 S 3,370,834
Total Resources $ 3,411,864 $ 194,000 $ 3,605,864
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 3,192,834 $ 194,000 $ 3,386,834
Transfers to Other Funds $ 55,881 $ 55,881
Contingency S - S -
Total Budget $ 3,248,715 $ 194,000 $ 3,442,715
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 163,149 $ - $ 163,149
Total Requirements $ 3,411,864 $ 194,000 $ 3,605,864
Page 18 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
14.Capital Improvement Program-Summerlake Restroom&COT/Tigard-Tualatin School Dist.Park Development
Summerlake Restroom installation requires the reallocation of underspent park bond project funds
to complete this project. Staff received support from PRAB at their December meeting.
A total of$89,000 will be transferred from 92035-COT/Tigard-Tualatin School District Park
Development project that has a total of$135,000 budgeted in FY 2015.This project will be backfilled
with Parks SDC funding.As a result,Park SDC contingency will decrease by$89,000 with an
increase in transfers.In turn,capital program expenditures will increase by the same amount.
Fund 1 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Parks SDC Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,124,011 $ 1,124,011
Licenses&Permits $ 476,336 $ 476,336
Interest Earnings S 19,782 S 19,782
Total Resources $ 1,620,129 $ - $ 1,620,129
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 12,000 $ 12,000
Transfers to Other Funds $ 1,130,602 $ 89,000 $ 1,219,602
Contingency S 71,615 5 (89,000) $ (17,385)
Total Budget $ 1,214,217 $ - $ 1,214,217
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 405,912 $ - $ 405,912
Total Requirements $ 1,620,129 $ - $ 1,620,129
Fund 2 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Parks Capital Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 174,509 $ 174,509
Intergovernmental $ 41,506 $ 41,506
Interest Earnings $ 3,015 $ 3,015
Transfers In from Other Funds $ 3,192,834 S 89,000 S 3,281,834
Total Resources $ 3,411,864 $ 89,000 $ 3,500,864
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 3,192,834 $ 89,000 $ 3,281,834
Transfers to Other Funds $ 55,881 $ 55,881
Contingency $ - S -
Total Budget $ 3,248,715 $ 89,000 $ 3,337,715
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 163,149 $ - $ 163,149
Total Requirements $ 3,411,864 $ 89,000 $ 3,500,864
Page 19 of 20
FY 2015 Second Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A
15.Capital Improvement Program-Pacific Hwy/Gaarde St./McDonald St.Intersection Improvements
A request for additional funds is required to fill the post-bid funding gap per the IGA with Washington
County,ODOT and the City of Tigard.The Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee(TTAC)has
recommended the use of City Gas Tax and Transportation Development Tax Funds to correct the
shortfall.City Council approved the resolution on December 9,2014.As a result,Reserve for Future
Expenditure in City Gas Tax will decrease by$1,100,000 with an increase in transfers.Capital program
expenditures will increase by the same amount in the Transportation CIP Fund.
Fund 1 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
City Gas Tax Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,681,510 $ 1,681,510
Intergovernmental $ 739,934 $ 739,934
Interest Earnings $ 34,584 $ 34,584
Miscellaneous $ 31,735 $ 31,735
Total Resources $ 2,487,763 $ - $ 2,487,763
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Debt Service $ 315,860 $ 315,860
Transfers to Other Funds $ 883,125 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,983,125
Contingency 5 50,000 $ 50,000
Total Budget $ 1,248,985 $ 1,100,000 $ 2,348,985
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 1,238,778 $(1,100,000) $ 138,778
Total Requirements $ 2,487,763 $ - $ 2,487,763
Fund 2 of 2 Q1 Q2
Revised Revised
Budget Amendment Budget
Transportation CIP Fund
Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 356,422 $ 356,422
Intergovernmental $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Transfers In from Other Funds $ 3,315,787 $ 1,100,000 S 4,415,787
Total Resources $ 3,872,209 $ 1,100,000 $ 4,972,209
Requirements
Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ -
Work-In-Progress $ 3,513,480 $ 1,100,000 $ 4,613,480
Transfers to Other Funds $ 44,613 $ 44,613
Contingency S - $ -
Total Budget $ 3,558,093 $ 1,100,000 $ 4,658,093
Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 314,116 $ - $ 314,116
Total Requirements $ 3,872,209 $ 1,100,000 $ 4,972,209
Page 20 of 20
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR Jam. 2d.jO(s-
:111 B II City of Tigard (DATE OF MEETING)
T I GARD Memorandum
To: City of Tigard Budget Committee
From: Toby LaFrance,Tigard Finance and Information Services Director
Re: FY 2015 Second Quarter Financial Report
Date: January 20, 2015
Introduction
I am pleased to provide you with the FY 2015 Second Quarter Financial Report. Please bear in
mind that the numbers on the following pages are not the official audited financials of the City
of Tigard. This means that the amounts represent the current fiscal situation of the City but
may change with further accounting review.
How to Read the Report
The tables on the following pages report the progress against budget through the first six
months of the fiscal year. Each page contains funds that are grouped to a similar purpose (e.g.
transportation funds,water funds, etc). For each fund, the table provides the amount of the
budget, the progress against budget and the percent of budget complete.
At the top of the page are the resources for each fund. The resources start with the funds'
Beginning Fund Balance,which represents the amount of savings in the fund at the beginning
of the fiscal year. Next are the revenues of the fund grouped by revenue type. For more
information on the particular revenues within a revenue type, see the Revenue Analysis section
and the Fund Summaries section of the Adopted FY 2015 Budget Document. The Beginning
Fund Balance plus the Revenues make up the Total Resources of the funds.
The bottom half of the report shows the fund Requirements. The Requirements start with the
Expenditures by type. For more information on the specific expenditures within a type, see the
Program Summaries section and the Fund Summaries section of the Adopted FY 2015 Budget
Documents. By subtracting the Total Expenditures from the available Total Resources, the
Change is Fund Balance is calculated. By combining the Change in Fund Balance and the
Beginning Fund Balance at the top of the page, the Ending Fund Balance is derived. Finally, the
Ending Fund Balance is added to the Total Expenditures to calculate the Total Requirements.
The Total Requirements equals the Total Resources to balance the budget.
Summary of Findings
This is a brief overall summary. Again, bear in mind that the financials here are not the official
audited financials of Tigard, but represent the current financial situation and may change with
further accounting review.
1. One of the main assumptions in our General Fund forecast is that we spend at, or below,
95% of budget. At this point, we are above this expenditure rate. We will continue to
monitor this development.
2. General Fund revenues are well above percent. This is expected since Property Taxes
are mostly received in November and December.
3. Property Tax collections are at 96% of budget. This is slightly higher than prior years
where collection was at 92-94% of budget at the end of December. The higher
percentage is expected since the FY 2015 budget is based on an assumed assessed value
growth of 3.0%. Actual assessed value grew by 4.4%
4. General Fund Public Works is at 50.4% spent. This was mentioned in the First Quarter
report. This caused by Parks and Engineering Divisions being slightly ahead of the 25%
pace due to summer maintenance and personnel turnover. We will continue to monitor
the situation
5. Development related revenues continue to be slightly below pace. This was mentioned
in the first quarter report. At this point, development activity is below last year's pace.
6. The exception on development related revenues is the Parks SDC fund (page 4) where
there was a development that brought in $189K, bringing the revenues in this fund ahead
of pace.
7. The Gas Tax Fund (page 6) has an additional$86K in "Other Revenue". This fund pays
for the electrical bill for the city's street lights and signals. The city received an incentive
for converting to LED lights.
8. The revenue in the Gas Tax and City Gas Tax fund (page 6) is below budget. This is due
to the timing in collections from the State. Finance expects to achieve the budgeted
revenue in the Gas Tax Fund but is revising our forecast for the City Gas Tax downward
to reflect actual collections from FY2014. This will result in forecasted revenue of about
$615K for the upcoming FY2016 budget. Finance will continue to monitor this item.
9. Revenue for Sewer and Stormwater (page 9) are overstated. Tigard collects user fees for
the city and Clean Water Services (CWS). The revenue in the report is the total
collection and has not been reduced for the turnover to CWS. After the turnover, the
revenue will be at expected levels.
Follow-up from Prior Quarterly Report of the Fiscal Year
10. Finance Staff followed up on the building related revenue concern noted in the First
Quarter report. Building activity,while still healthy has slowed and is at levels slightly
below last year. Based on this review, Finance staff is considering revising the current
forecasted revenues for the upcoming FY2016 budget.
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
General Fund
General Fund - 100
Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 10,179.774 11378.279 112°0
Revenues
Taxes 13,404,815 12,810,421 96°%o
Franchise Fees 5,799,632 1,190,614 21%
Special Assessments - - 0%
Licenses&Permits 1,177,412 972,077 83%
Intergovernmental 5,731,319 3,845,117 67%
Charges for Services 2,688,234 1,121,173 42%
Fines&Forfeitures 993,232 397,805 40%
Investment Earnings 103,722 98,955 95%
Other Revenue 55,873 39,815 71%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment 254,000 - 0%
Transfers In - - Q
Total Revenues W 30,2litin 20,475,976 6$ll
Total Resources 40,388,013 31,854,255 79%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration 838,936 382,981 46%
1 Community Development 3,556,095 ' 1,463,373 41%
Community Services 21,031,479 10,583,346 50%
Public Works 5,881,563 2,962,037 50%
Debt Service - - 0%
Capital Improvement - - 0%
Loan to CCDA 254,000 - 0%
Transfers Out 879,467 714,661 81%
Contingency 1.250202 - 0q
Totalapenditures IIIIIPMIIIIIIMIPN
Change in Fund Balance (3,483,503) 4,369,579 -125%
Ending Fund Balance 6,606,271 15,747,858 235%
Total Requirements 40,388,013 31,854,255 79%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 1 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50°,/o of the year)
Central Service Funds
Central Svc Fund - 600 Fleet/Prop Mngmt Fund - 650 Insurance Fund - 660
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 417,867 421173 102% 60,269 87,008 144% 843,157 858,592 102%
Revenues
Taxes - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Intergovernmental - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Charges for Services 6,523,150 3,264,025 50% 1,646,995 823,49- 50% - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - 0°'0 - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 593 11,738 1979% - 0% 7,810 - 0%
Other Revenue 1"2,277 39 0% 29,392 0% 14,000 4,091 29%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Transfers In 224.963 1 12,482 50% - - 0l - 2°Lq
TotalItevetiaei 6,760,983 3,388,284 - 59'%sT 1,676,387 823,497 49'1 21,810 4,091 19%
Total Resources -,1-8,850 3,813,457 53% 1,736,656 910,506 52°° 864,967 862,683 100%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration 7,073,028 3,267,438 46% - 0% 50,000 230 0%
Community Development - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Community Services - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Public Works - 0% 1,650,805 694,049 42% - - 0%
Debt Service - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Capital Improvement - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Loan to CCDA - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Transfers Out - 0% - - 0% 718 359 50%
Contingency 100,000 00° 75.0W - 0° ■ 25.000 -
Total Expendis-, 7,174028 3,267,438 46% 1,725,805 694,049 40%
(:hank in Fund Balance (412,045) 120,846 -29°0 140,4181 1_"x,448 262°o (53,908) 3,502 -6%
Ending Fund Balance 5,812 546,019 9395°'0 _ 10,851 210,456 1995° 789,249 862,093 109'0
Total Requirements 7,178,840 3,813,457 53% 1,736,656 910,506 52% 864,967 862,683 100%
°Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 2 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Development Funds
Building Fund - 230 Elec. Insp. Fund - 220
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 2.055,6-8 1.968 281 96°0 153,181 124.136 81%
Revenues
Taxes - - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits 1,579,004 711,273 45% 191,043 85,437 45%
Intergovernmental 8,281 2,895 35% - - 0%
Charges for Services 7,035 1,616 23% - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 19,782 1,811 9% 1207 0%.
Other Revenue 923 510 55% 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0% - - 0%
Transfers In 1000 90.000 50% _ - 0%
Total Revenues 1,7WE 808,1 ° 192,250 85,437 4'
Total Resources 3,850,'03 2,776,387 72% 345,431 209,573 61%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0% - - 0%
Community Development 1,608,5 i 5 '- 1 r∎263 51% - - 0%
Community Services - - 0% - - 0%
Public Works - - 0% - - 0%
Debt Service - - 0% - 0%
Capital Improvement - 0% - - 0%
Loan to CCDA - - 0% - - 0%
Transfers Out - - 0% 180,000 90,000 50%
Contingency 200,000 - (116. 50,000 0°„
Total Expencres 1,808,518 90,000 39%
Change in Fund Balance (13,493) (8,157) 60% (37,750) (4,563) 12°"
Ending Fund Balance 2,042,185 1,960,124 96% 115,431 119,573 104%
Total Requirements 3,850,703 2,776,387 72% 345,431 209,573 61 Yo
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 3 u>t 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Parks Funds
Parks Capital Fund - 420 Parks Bond Fund - 421 Parks SDC Fund - 425
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 174.509 497.494 285% 2.448.595 2.395.068 98% 1.124.011 1,568,420 140°,o
Revenues
Taxes - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - 0% - 0% - - 00/0
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits - 0% - - 0% 476,336 388,747 82%
Intergovernmental 41,506 - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Charges for Services - - 00/0 - - 0% - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 3,015 1,063 35% 4,020 5,521 137% 19,782 1,478 7%
Other Revenue - 0% - - 0% 0%
- o
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Transfers In 3.192.834 155.193 512 - - QL - 0%
Total eder><tnes 3,237;355 VIPS; VA 4,020 5,521 `21 tr/lA 496,118 390,225 —
Total Resources 3,411,864 653,750 19% 2,452,615 2,400,589 98°■ 1,620,129 1,938,643 121%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - 0% - - 0% 0%
Community Development 0% - 0% - 0%
Community Services 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Public Works 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Debt Service - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Capital Improvement 3,192,834 200,268 6% - 0% 12,000 3,369 28%
Loan to CCDA - - 0°,'0 - - 0% - - ' 0%
Transfers out 55,881 27,941 50% 2,099,143 91,830 4% 1,130,602 36,593 30/,
Contingency 0 '0 - -
° QL 71,615 0%
Total Expenditures ; -3,248,715, 228,209 i megA0MiiiiMRPO WWI 1,214,217 39,961 3
Ciangc in I and Balance (11,360) (71,953) 633°a (2,095,123) (86,309) 4% 18,()99) 350,264 49°o
Ending Fund Balance 163,149 425,541 261% 353,472 2,308,759 653% 405,912 1,918,684 443°o
Total Requirements 3,411,864 653,750 - 19% 2,452,615- 2,400,589 98% 1,620,129 1,958,645 121%
°Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/20154:50 PM 4 o 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50%o of the year)
Parks Funds
Urban Forestry Fund
Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 1,121,300 1,349,861 12000
Revenues
Taxes - - 0°0
Franchise Fees - - 0°0
Special Assessments - - 0°o
Licenses&Permits - - 0°0
Intergovernmental - - 0%
Charges for Services 26,250 4,296 16%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0%
Investment Earnings 4,060 1,414 35%
Other Revenue - - 0°0
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0°,0
Transfers La - - 0°0
Total 36tD 5,710 19°/«
Total Resources 1,151,610 1,355,571 118%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0%
Community Development - - 0%
Community Services - - 0°,0
Public Works - - 0%
Debt Service - - 0°0
Capital Improvement - - 0°0
Loan to CCDA - 0°0
Transfers Out 250,1.5 6,152 2°o
Contingency - - 0°0
25005 6,152
Change in Fund Balance (219,865) (442) 0%
Ending Fund Balance 901,435 1,349,419 150'0
Total Requirements 1,151,610 1,355,571 118%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Transportation Funds
Gas Tax Fund - 200 City Gas Tax Fund - 205 Street Maint. Fee Fund - 412
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 571.900 985,270 172% 1,681,510 1.736.934 103% 1.317.786 1.370.438 104%
Revenues
Taxes - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits 225 13,637 6061% - - 0% - 0%
Intergovernmental 2,990,443 1,271,483 43°%o 739,934 197,332 27% - 0%
Charges for Services - - 0°'0 - - 0% 1,999,623 9 1 7,48 3 46%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0°o - - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 55,732 78,396 141% 34,584 16,628 48% 2,043 - 0%
Other Revenue 61,343 106,264 173% 31,735 - 0% 1,286 50 4%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Transfers In 100-000 50.000 500 n - 0% 0%
Total - 345 i, l 47% 806,253 213,961 27% 2,002,952 917,533 46%
Total Resources 3,779,645 2,505,051 66°0 2,487,763 1,950,894 78% 3,320,738 2,287,971 69°%o
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0°o - 0% - - 0%
Community Development - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Community Services - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Public Works 2,205,002 872,380 40% - - 0% - - 0%
Debt Service 599,676 65,693 11% 313,860 34,575 11% - - 0%
Capital Improvement - - 0% 0%- - 1,900,000 1,573,029 83%
Loan to CCDA - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Transfers Out 907,023 135,573 15% 883,125 765,631 87% 207,805 103,903 50%
Contingency 57.610 00°,0 50,000 - 0°"0 200,000 - at
Total Expenditures 3,769,311 1,073,646 28% 1,248,985 800,246 64% 2,3074805 MIIIIIIIIMMI
Change in Fund Balance (561,566) 446,135 --9°0 (442,-32) (586,246) 132'0 (304,853) (759,398) 249%
Ending Fund Balance 10,334 1,431,405 138510■, 1,238,778 1,150,688 93°0 1,012,933 611,039 60°/n
Total Requirements 3,779,645 2,505,051 66°,/o 2,487,763 1,950,894 78% 3,320,738 2,287,971 69%
°Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 6 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50°o of the year)
Transportation Funds (Continued)
TDT Fund - 405 TIF Fund - 410 Underground Util. Fund - 411
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 1.388324 1.474.749 106 0 465.923 _ 506.899 109% 526.832 576.579 109°0
Revenues
Taxes - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits 556,996 233,332 42% - 4,994 0% 35,5-4 27,6-- 78%
Intergovernmental - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Charges for Services - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 11,279 1,161 10% 628 0% -,160 463 6%
Other Revenue - 0% - - 0°0 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repaymen - 0% - - ()°0 - 0%
Transfers In 0°, - - (I°, - 0%
Total Revenues 568,275 234,493 41% - 5,623 0% 42,734 28,142 661
Total Resources 1,956,599 1,709,242 87% 465,923 512,521 110°a 369,566 604,722 106%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0% - 0% - (1°
Community Development - - 0% - 0°0 - - I1°
Community Services - - 0% - 0°0 - 0°o
Public Works - - 0% - - 0°o - 0°'0
Debt Service - - 0% - - 0°0 - - 0%
Capital Improvement 12,000 3,369 28% - - 0°'0 - 0°0
Loan to CCDA - - 0% - - 0°o - - 0°0
Transfers Out 805,578 523,333 65% 465,923 411,666 8800 205,057 117,643 57%
Contingency 225,546 - DoL, - - 0°0 50,000 0°0
tunes alliMMIR07124 ,, 88% 255,057 117,643 441
Change in Fund Balance (474,849) (292,209) 62% (465,923) (406,043) 8'°0 (212,323) (89,500) 42%
Ending Fund Balance 913,475 1,182,541 129% - 100,855 0°0 314,509 487,079 155%
Total Requirements 1,956,599- 1,709,242- 87% 465,923 512,521 110% 569,566 604,722 _ 106%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 7 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Transportation Funds (Continued)
Trans Capital Proj Fund - 460
Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 356.422 247,331 1 69°,0
Revenues
Taxes - - 0 0/0
Franchise Fees - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0%
Licenses&Permits - - 0%
Intergovernmental 200,000 (267) 0%
Charges for Services - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0%
Investment Earnings - - 0%
Other Revenue - - 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repaymeni - - 0°/i
Transfers In 3.315.787 1.953.348 59°0
VIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBIE
Total Resources 1 3,872,209 2,200,411 57%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0%
Community Development - - 0°%o
Community Services - - 0%
Public Works - - 0°/0
Debt Service - - 0%
Capital Improvement 3,513,480 2,040,366 58%
Loan to CCDA - - 0%
Transfers Out 44,613 22,307 50°,'0
Contingency - - 0`)/0
Wires IPRWIIIIIIMINIIIIPM
Change in Fund Balance (42,306) (109,592) 259°0
Ending Fund Balance 314,116 137,738 44°0
Total Requirements 3,872,209 2,200,411 57%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Sani / Stormwater Funds
Sanitary Sewer Fund - 500 Stormwater Fund - 510 Water Qual/Quant Fund - 511
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 4.618.778 5,230.317 113% 3.818245 3.538.989 93% 1,199,825 1.253.044 104%
Revenues
Taxes - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Licenses&Permits 74,506 10,166 14% - - 0% 9,713 1,375 14%
Intergovernmental - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Charges for Services 2,096,904 1,547,739 74% 3,034,291 1,337,583 44% - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0°,0 - - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 100,333 5,325 5% 7,936 3,003 38% 15,102 1,038 7%
Other Revenue 141,674 - 0% 3,069 - 0% - - 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0% - 0% - 0%
"I r:insfers ltt 1,369,900 48.756 _ 444 - 1,025 0% - 0%
Total Revenues ----'--'3,78.3,317 0 1,611,9�SG'= "43% 3,045,296 1,142,510 44'/0 24,815 2,413 10%
Total Resources 8,402.i)93 6,842,303 81°„ 6,863,541 4,881,499 71° 1,224,641) 1255,457 103°0
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Community Development - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Community Services - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Public Works 1,9 74,545 922,000 47% 1,634,362 710,-35 43% - - 0%
Debt Service - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Capital Improvement 2,996,061 1,022,396 34% 367,873 45,501 12% - - 0%
Loan to CCDA - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Transfers Out 79,849 16,591 21°./a 350,956 38,471 11% 439,200 825 0%
Contingence 371.715 - 90.050 - 0°,1) 25.000 -
Total Expenditures ; _- - 2,443,241 794,707 33% 464,200 825 WIWI
(ii,,,,,in Fund Balance (1,638,853) (349,001) 21"„ 602,055 547,803 91",, (439,385) 1,588 0°„
Ending Fund Balance 2,979,925 4,881,316 164"), 4,420,300 4,086,792 92°,a 760,440 _1,234,632 165°o
Total Requirements 8,402,095 6,842,303 81% 6,863,541 4,881,499 71% 1,224,640 1,255,457 103%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 9 of 13
I
FY 2015 -January Report duly thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Water Funds
Water Fund - 530 Water SDC Fund - 531 Water CIP Fund - 532
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 16.125.957 16233.500 101°o 2,860,840 3.910.001 137% 43.359.624 48.200.050 111%
Revenues
Taxes - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Licenses&Permits 11,133 46,784 420% 943,805 315,290 33% - 0%
Intergovernmental - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Charges for Services 16,711,547 8,860,863 53% - - 0% - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Investment Earnings 30,644 13,436 44% 233 3,425 1470% 13,096 2,100 16%
Other Revenue 10,825 9,371 87% - - 0% 5,265 49,314 937%
Proceeds from Loan Repaymen - - 0% - - 0°,/0 52,000,000 - 0%
Transfers in 58,751 29,376 50% - 0% 1233.104 101.845 $L
Totainues . . 9,830 5' '- 944,038 318,71.5 "_
Total Resources 32,948,857 25,193,33(1 76°4. 3,8(14,878 4,228,716 111% 96,611,089 48,353,308 50%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Community Development - - 0% - - 0% - 0%
Community Services - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Public Works 8,376,282 3,492,358 42% - 0°,o - - 0%
Debt Service - - 0% - - 0°0 - - 0%
Capital Improvement - - 0% - - 0°,0 80,910,333 32,523,496 40%
Loan to CCDA - - 0% - 0% - - 0%
Transfers Out 5,767,077 2,490,679 43% 345,263 132 0°/s 215,650 30,138 14%
Contingency 500,000 - 0% 100,000 0% - - 0%
Total 14,643,359 5,983,037 41% 445,263 132 0% 81,12.5,983 32,553,633
Change in Fund Balance 2,179,541 2,976,793 137% 498,775 318,584 64°., (27,874,518) (32,400,375) 116%
Ending Fund Balance 18,305,498 19,210,293 105% 3,359,615 4,228,584 126°.0 15,485,106 15,799,675 102%
Total Requirements _ 32,948,857 25,193,330_ 76% 3,804,878 4,228,716 111% 96,611,089 48,353,308 50%
`Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 10 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50°,o of the year)
Water Funds
Water Debt Svc Fund - 533
Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 6.605,801 6.641.441 1010/0
Revenues
Taxes - - 00 o
Franchise Fees - - 00 o
Special Assessments - - 00 o
Licenses&Permits - - 0°,o
Intergovernmental - - 0%
Charges for Services - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0%
Investment Earnings - 1 7,733 0%
Other Revenue - - 0?'o
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - 00,o
Transfers In 4.719.850 ',350,(>25 5000
Total Revem - 4-MISO 2,377,658 50%
Total Resources 11,325,651 9,019,099 80%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0%
Community Development - 0%
Community Services - - 0%
Public Works - - 0%
Debt Service 4,881,033 2,521,108 52%
Capital Improvement - - 0%
Loan to CCDA - - 0%
Transfers Out 3,010 1,505 50%
Contingency - - 0%
Change in Fund Balance (164,193) (144,955) 88°0
Ending Fund Balance 6,441,608 6,496,486 101%
Total Requirements 11,325,651 9,019,099 80%
*Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Debt Service and Other Funds
GO Debt Svc Fund-350 Bancroft Debt Svc Fund-300Libr. Donations/Bequests-98lCriminal Forfeiture Fund-240
Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget Budget YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 522.984 532 3228 102% 323.473 151.315 47°o 474.648 474.648 100"„ 122.480 182.978 149"0
Revenues
Taxes 2,386,688 2,190,503 92°6 - - 0% - - 0% - - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0°0 - - 0"0 - - 0"0 - - 0"0
Special Assessments - - 0". 120,0(10 21,623 18". - - 0"„ - - 0"
Licenses&Permits - - 0". - - 0% - - i 1° - - 0%
Intergovernmental - - 000 - - 0°./ 0%
-
Charges for Services - - 0"0 - - 0% - - V' - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 00 o - - 0% - 11" 43,000 56,819 132%
Investment Earnings 4,612 5,645 122". - 22,791 0°' 1,892 (17) -1%
Other Revenue (193) 0". 0°. 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repaymen - - 0"0 0% - - - - 0%
Transfers In - - 0"0 - - 0°,'0 0°/
Total Revenues 2,391,107 2,196,147 92% 120,000 44,414 37% - - 0% 44,892 56,802 127%
Total Resources 2,914,091 2,728,476 94"o 443,473 195,729 44' 474,648 474,648 1o00,, 167,372 239,780 143
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 006 11", - - 0°s
Community Development - - 00" Ip,° - _ OSo-
Community Services - - 0°0 - - (1"" - - 1i"0 50,000 2,500 5
Public Works - - 0". - - 0% 0% - - 0%
Debt Service 2,194,71)1 1,102,338 50"0 1 9 3,41 1 34863 50°0 - - 0°0 - - 0%
Capital Improvement - - )I" - - 0% - - 10 0 - - 0%
Loan to CCDA - - 0", - 0°," - - 0%
Transfers Out 1,529 765 51 2,,'1 120 50"0 100,000 - n 455 228 50°o
Contingency (1"0 - - u" - - 0
Toia imenditures 71r 2,196,230 1,103,102 _,5O%k 1032650__ _4982 50% 100,000 - 0% 50,455 2,728 54
Change in tun,(Balance 194,877 1,0931145 561°/0 16,350 (7,568, 16'„ (100.0101 a x51,7 34)17.} -972"0
Ending Fund Balance 717,861 1,625,374 226°0 339,823 143,747 42"„ 374,648 474,648 127 0 116,917 237,052 203"
Total Requirements 2,914,091 2,728,476 94%- 443,473 195,729 44% 474,648 474,648 100% 167,372 239,780 143%
°Note:Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may change with further accounting review.
1/20/2015 4:50 PM 12 of 13
FY 2015 -January Report (July thru Dec. - 50% of the year)
Capital Projects Funds
Facilities Cap Proj Fund - 400
B udg et YTD* %of Budget
Resources
Beginning Fund Balance 878.435 905.166 103°0
Revenues
Taxes - - 0%
Franchise Fees - - 0%
Special Assessments - - 0%
Licenses&Permits - - 0%
Intergovernmental - - 0%
Charges for Services - - 0%
Fines&Forfeitures - - 0%
Investment Earnings 3,212 22%
Other Revenue - 0%
Proceeds from Loan Repayment - - 0%
Transfers In 1.031.891 -39.680 72%
Total linarties 13 740,382 72%
Total Resources 1,913,538 1,645,549 86%
Requirements
Expenditures
Policy&Administration - - 0%
Community Development - - 0%
Community Services - - 0%.
Public Works - 01'/o
Debt Service - - 0%
Capital Improvement 674,900 619,922 92%
Loan to CCDA - - 0%
Transfers Out 8,742 4,371 50%
Contingency 50,000 - 00%
Total 2° " 733,642 624,293
Change in Fund Balance 301,461 116,089 39%
Ending Fund Balance 1,179,896 1,021,255 87%
Total Requirements 1,913,538 1,645,549 86%
*Note: Financials presented are not the official audited financials of the City of Tigard,but represent
the current financial situation and may ch-nge with further accounting review.
AIS-2079 3.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 01/20/2015
Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes
Agenda Title: Tigard Street Trail: Design Concepts
Prepared For: Kenny Asher, Community Development
Submitted By: Lloyd Purdy, Community Development
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
During fall 2014, the city's Community Development Department convened two focus
groups with city staff and downtown stakeholders to explore design themes and concepts for
the Tigard Street Trail. Resolve Architecture and Planning,which facilitated these discussions
and researched relevant themes,will share its "work in progress" with the Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Council has requested to discuss the work in progress and share their ideas and opinions.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Tigard Street Trail project will convert about 3/4 of a mile of unused rail spur right-of-way
into a dedicated off street walk/bike path, including lighting and safety fencing, and a public
space where the trail intersects with Main Street. In 2014, the city signed a 99-year lease with
ODOT Rail for use of this property.
The path would stretch from Main Street to Tiedeman Avenue, connecting Tigard's
residential workforce to centers of employment locally and regionally. Employers and
employees in Downtown Tigard and commuters will have improved access to the Tigard
Transit Center and will benefit from the bus and WES commuter rail connection to jobs and
services in Portland to the east and neighboring Washington County communities to the west.
The city applied for a Connect Oregon V grant from the Oregon Department of
Transportation seeking $1.2 million in funding to support this investment. This proposal
ranked 6 out of 35 applications in the bike/pedestrian mode category. The city's proposal will
be reviewed again for funding consideration in January 2015.
While funding is not yet secured, staff has advanced the Tigard Street Trail project. In the fall
of 2014, in response to interest by Downtown stakeholders, the Community Development
Department organized two focus groups to work with Resolve Architecture and Planning to
explore possible design themes and concepts. Focus group participants included members of
City Council, Tigard Downtown Alliance, City Center Advisory Commission, and Tigard
Transportation Advisory Committee, and staff. Resolve developed three design concepts that
reflect s unique history, environment and community. They will present the concepts
(Boardwalk, Nature Walk, and Art Walk) to Council at the January 20 workshop meeting.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
No alternative for consideration at this time.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Strategic Plan
In 2014, the City of Tigard adopted a strategic vision focused on making this city the most
walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities enjoy
healthy and interconnected lives. The Tigard Street Trail is a manifestation of this vision that
improves connectivity for residents, employees and commuters.
2013-14 Council Goal
Downtown: Continue Tigard St. Trail negotiation, design and development
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
First introduction to design concepts.
Attachments
Location map/graphic
Tigard Street Trail Existing Conditions
4'
•
4
tt
♦'a
s �
• Tigard Street Trail: A Path to Employment
• • 3/4-mile trail connecting residents to employment opportunities in Tigard.
• •
i
♦ i
Right-of-Way indicated by dashed red line.
1 1
i a.
� E
Q S
4 `b
WALKER C`
City of Tigard -TIGARD STREET TRAIL ODOT RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY
Tigard Street Trail: A Path to Employment
. _
EXISTING TRAIL CONDITIONS In Tigard,85 percent of the
workforce commutes out of the
IMP • -
city daily.A"Path to Employment"
x
P connects Tigard's workforce to centers of
r_w
employment.This includes connectivity to a
"" ' xtt downtown commercial core of 250 employers•
. si�, ; and 33 industrial-zoned properties.
Regionally, a path to employment connects
34. _ rr �_ ,- Tigard's 50,000 residents to employment
U
�. centers ranging from Downtown Portland to
Beaverton via WES commuter rail,light rail,
;� �" z•.; ! and seven bus routes accessible at the
�,Sir -"m 4'.-- In Tigard,at least 85 percent of the workforce y rv. °? - r�.` " downtown transit station.
Abandoned rail spur becomes a path to commutes out of the city daily.With more This path to employment connects to a
employment linking residents with jobs jobs in Tigard than residents,Tigard also downtown commercial core of 250 employers A fully connected multimodal transit system
downtown and in adjacent industrial-zoned supplies the regional labor market with skilled and the surrounding 33 industrial-zoned
properties,as well as regionally through professionals and employment opportunities. properties as well as another 200 firms within is needed to serve this fluid regional
downtown Tigard's transit station.Provides The Tigard Street Trail becomes a path to walking distance of downtown. employment market.A Path to Employment
connections to Portland,Beaverton and other employment connecting residents(workforce) links new connections from Tigard's
light-rail linked cities. with jobs locally and regionally. neighborhoods to existing mass transit and
employment centers.The Tigard Street Trail
is a path to employment connecting
�_ residents to local and regional jobs. It will
yro►
', -'!' .�{.- use the inactive rail corridor along Tigard
` Y - Street from Tiedeman Avenue to downtown
IT- . ' i _ ;ta 3a` t > Tigard and the Tigard Transit Center/WES
� �� 4/ f .'� transit station. It currently has no sidewalks
or other bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure.
_ n. f The proposed "Path to Employment" builds
-. a • , - upon a 16-foot gravel path(rail bed rock)
surface.The alignment would make use of
' r .r ... • existing sidewalks downtown and a bicycle/
`'f "' ' `.` pedestrian bridge on Tigard Street to also
This adaptive reuse of transit infrastructure will In addition to filling a gap in the transportation system,this project improves safety in two critical connect to the Fanno Creek Trail and the
provide a safe biking and walking connection ways.First,it would improve the current barrier along the trail where it is adjacent to the active
from Tiedeman Avenue to Main Street and the PWNR and WES track.Second,it would ensure maintenance and visibility on this neglected right Summer Creek Trail—linking even more
Tigard Transit Center.The existing gravel would of way.In its current form,this half-mile inactive rail alignment has fallen into disrepair,with homes into a multimodal transit system
be replaced with a hard surface trail,with overgrown and fallen trees,informal paths heading toward the active tracks,and signs of illegal
lighting,landscaping,and improved safety camping.At least one local resident has taken it upon himself to pick up litter almost daily,due to from door front to desk.
fencing next to the active rail line, the absence of dedicated maintenance.
The Tigard Street Trail is a multimillion
dollar infrastructure investment.Tigard will
- seek funding from a range of partners to
help build this project that connects our
City of Tigard 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT residents to their jobs.
TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I wwwtigard-or.gov
1111
TIGARD
Progress To Date Presentation to Tigard City Council
1.20.15
TIGARD ' s
Trail by the Rail
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
. .
,. -.-
•1-..... -• .i'. . 1%,,
1 i-Pri -- - 111111V-. 44A, If* • -te• '". -
.. . 1 ,,..v...1. I ....... • WOO< .,/,; * I .. 'r ''. 0,
•' ',''''',...,,-,.... ...Or , , ..... .C1..--,.- .■
, 7,11.- ;•,‘,4 .,...,.4=.! : 77,-,,,,''' -`,.-1 m.:,
T ; '' • ; iimprotiffi_(41 &Ili: 1111411:"": -"...' Mill'1 Mit: ;
Fr. - - ..., ..
SE " ---- .e. --:-. - ..:'.. 1.-: :.'T- ,:-,7 !..- . ' : "tr.,: = • . ,+,...' :'..
-, ..TIN _.,„at •`; • ..)",.11,i.y. .- 37,00•1.i tl ---",,erA,- :•-.11 ...... 4,-;„
2 ''. 'r- ---',4t ,_. i .0k....!,,'.1.4,4 `i-..=
04 ...., , o vv 4 ' . ■ • .3-• 0 I , ;,
/01 l i ,,,,,,,,_\ . *, •'0/1 '.';');LI■•• )1 '. '''' . '.' • • * . .
''''''
-4'..' 11:41.4:71ft. , 441.‘.q •' ..-
;:i,-""' ._ , '.,,;v4.••• , -4,1•1v;iit) .tii..:* _. . /
.1‘,.■i, .
t ' :q.t., '• i-. '''''' ,. r f -
•
, ' .',4it- - Sr ■-'''' - '" ' ... . :
.
111
. . ,t ,.-: ..." ....:-.), - L,.. ,..; •-., - , r.1 ...'.. ,. s. ., r.
,.:7.4.....4 , 40 ' ' '''''
. ••• ' .
-AO 4i. --,' .• , ..• —,e_"- t-, , ' . , 1 '',..,,Itifi, 0- . _.
' — s, • IC;. , ,..90/!';;;I G:. '',',...:,., 1:7,--,-."
.. ,•
r‘. A■•••••.... ‘s.'
1 • . • C. . - '
' I
s.' Mileinitlf?ICU
s .,\,-.-11.0*.,,•„,r. .'.• - .-. ,- -, -'--i
.. . .
...• . ... ......._
. . _
-
,. ___ ,,:. :, Z....-,1,44.4q."1,4114-itrilk-
_ - ..ill
i' Ar°1 ...1
41140---f -- - ---
-
. •
_,..
. .
RESOLVE
Apci.-irT(JuRi- + pNirdc,
4. • ill
. r: '
_ .... ,
. .
. ....,
.- --
, . . .
I 4- ri --5
.. ,. .
,... . . .,„ 4.. . A . :. ,.
. ' **'4*-1'•%."1", «e''''
1 • • '1 ';''L --
.7
/
., ..
• A , -Ilks, -.-,
/ .
• . . ,-A
u-- 4---,-.-- _
---.:-, ,
. . ' . i
/
....„
- '14-••;ii"e'---,'""11:1616.1
, , 1- ,,lit • ' .
—,
1 • r s .1. .
I . . ' "
1 . ,i. _ii.31 -', 'e.:::- ' '1,'I' '+' _ 'N11 - 1
4 , A - -.....:- ''4 •''' Ally el
' '''''' .;lies *--..-7-,,•::".i... - t .- - ‘r 11 1..
.44 • 4..
•••
., .. ..4 r 'sir, 4... .
... "
'7"- r- . ' p. •
' .- .1 +1, I.1
i • .
11111"1111t.— • '--- ,.- '.
et
1.0 ii,.■{All ,,,, ,r ‘....„„
... . .--
. ,
+ . .
-.....-",-
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
- --'• ,
- - .
1.11)4041.0:
00.1.1.11.1.m1"1".411, i wroo t211 1.4;iitti
.....
- - ,,,-- Pt•
A 1 kfi:‘,114
i N
... ... - ,...
r
... _.
. ,,
. -. •, .,
', . '. Vim lie.,■, 1144 ii,,,,a.i., , 4, ,, .,,, I
''../...' *------------------"■-•.-___ --__-_-■'''''''*.. ' * I
\ ,
.•:.,..a.. \ . ....- .
,-.-.• At rk'''::qiei .
TM apoP li
tl.
,,v.7. ,t,
. _ 1 4 I A:litei 1414k ,', Li.
s' ,.. . \..• t°. IVO%4, ' '
' -.""Nr'-' -.. . • '--. IP It.,•
i , ,., BR
,, , .4;1 ..:,.
. ■ ' 'Cr "Pi 141 ..41),, 1 k: *
- '..,''''-` •:"..=!:.-'----. - :iiiiiiitrl ci'l;.:;',,:,'' 75,„: ..,,,. ,,4„, / ,
—10 bota 111 41114 11. 1.1.;,
-"' ' '0 . 11, 1;;;it ;il;:i: 1 '
.... vg... _ ‘ .........-. ,..,-—
1 .4"--'
l .
.,,
OP \. F- • . as114
,.,;,_;.-,,.^.-.'_-:_:-‘1,■_=471:4 towili-nti:iii,:ig:,‘,.."..,i ; ,imiiii- sis....".a':.:
_
. • iftk ,.
J-•. \ - ' " ' - .
I --- , ....._:._ .--,!!'-'-,- . --- ..101 - , ,....,....7-:. .•' -'•
. ,
- •
11(.. -• ---'
- .- ---.- t
' k., •
____
--. - 01- ---; ''
...- ----
_ , .,,,... .- op - - • .441CAffilliiiiMo"
_, .... - ", .........-
• i , •,.., ' , . .
■' '1 ' .' ;,.:4 A
A ' 111 ,- .•i •
2 ..'44.21.4.• . -
I) -._-
,:-••--%1-547-1610. 1,,lq; -:..- -. .
/ .,•••-• - -, •-.. .
°
. . -
.--,-
• •
J. .
— ... ..2,.
. 1 .„ogger ..:01=1"-■-...... ...-----._
4■1•Auppapp
•
. ,-,-•:.
, .
-_,. ,.
' ......../..T.,
/ /
RESOLVE
ARCI-HrTECTURE + P'_ANNINIC=
• & tts
• Food Downtown
Painting Arts Cra
Classes and Glass Blowing 'f''g2
• Face Painting `14
-- 14 _4
c For more Information go to www.Ilk —.
ill ..i.....dow"""""mill II I
), ► exploredowntowntigard.com or our
.^ Facebook page:www.Facebook.
41.Pir i ., k com/exploredowntowntigard
4
I L.- iI 1 la I�`i iii �I J {pail ye
OUP has scale Wont
'trt streets and Irlk �t
idewatks - downtown ►Ry r E ,Jt
lord in the o1ddays. _
_A _
HAVE A VOICE IN F z ; .. '
TIGARD'S _ _
4
FUTURE Strategic Plan ' + ",
JULY 10.:011 • 71 f j i Jr
CONNECTING I - .1
PEOPLE a PLACES
6
} u
,,
+� , ` -
,so - - — .4- c•
RESOLVE
^,RCH'TZ:TUR- + P .'=,`,INli c;
t ?• R 1
iigi1-.1111:-'• i&ilk I -
lie X• ' 1 /)1. Y ` i
: ,,• _ . I ( L
L . _ i. lc '
iti. e.• =
,
/'��
f LL
ii. r- r
4$4 1 ,
. .�
•ll.�; ,.®,r. +.-, r ,41.1'` �I,I•* 4° a f , ;J, �„ a�.1• .`
• >.��a r� f' art .. °.4/4400 4. c .., ,
- r„......1 . ....- .., -, -e Ill ' ti, ../. iiir -.I! ...
4
w
aik 'Os
' ■
al in nil .7. , *
-
• e�
� �-
t1:,. _
11J J
• n (�_ > <
- Y. • ir
O1 •
�'
�!f r, (.!)
in W
•
x
7;� � , •�
,c-..I Syr--." ' . ,),,, I•
�_�' • BFI
�; r s•• ,, ; '= f .Fib:
•
y
— >{ e
f -77
a 'dr .� . ` f( r an
—r
_ .s ..._
*..:.a. .. _.. �..
...may.'•
R E S O L V E Trail by the Rail - Approaching Main Street
ARCHITECTURE: + PLANNING
1.1... 14
,, ■ .. , .. -4---"
. MI-
1414N▪4
,, . ,_ .. ,•,,,.., ,, . ,
... • .
I
.. .......,
Ammo' .
1 .
1
■
, 1
'...!, . .. • 'tC). ..),...,
C...) .
. .......,,tylkt
CC)
.C
— r
-'.5 O.:- .= - . . ..; %• .4. .11 ; 0
. -
' .
. '
1 0)
:ll 01 T
II/1 ' ' • : '- — . . .•„,
, , _C
t U
0
. 1 a
•
,..,...tiriiiiiilior i'..,i,i 1 . ils.., ,
0
S''. if I41h
i --r
' .
:-. ' ., .- ,
. s It VI ,
,,'. „.. .
_.,..
l
),
11, e I 2
,..
..,.... ,.. .,
......, ...:, , , 1 „.„,
r ,
,t • -•,.
•
,. . _..
_CD
: . „4 . •■■.
o '!
E-
'1 ,
•
\
A,- •
11,..„, • ii '''. •
, .
■
•
..,_,
,..
.
lioo , o \
,
'
\
' .
1111F.
1 4:
\
-t-
i. \•,...„
4'''' .• ' ; \ c.:
. >
•, ----. _I
0
\ i•
1 , •
a :',
• , ,
„„.
•t Lc)
w
,, 4.1 , ;'''' • ,
\ (Y
, ..- •
kT , \ % \I
,. , ...-
M ..I .. * -
—
.„),iiitigi• ,' : • : ' . /- :
(J_) • ' . . r. •
- .• .. 401.4',
: !fl.... - Le.
- . -•
16.4" . ,
)
f— . .
.if • t •4#14- f
, ._. ,‘ ..•„ .
T ',. ' 44, • .
. ..
•. .
4 A • %,1%.1 . •
. . -
. .
.., ..
7J it . ...I
m 101, ;„*". k i i"
,
' ' . OEM .., •
_
4 i
...,
,...„-: (X).....4,,foNtt_i.' -I.
,_.
r 1 ,. .....
.,
. ..
, , co
•-•- I
• •
. ,
.. . . ,. • ,-
• •
= ••4,,,
..,'' ...
_-,-.
Ul _ •
•
. 0 ..--411r. r' . 410,
. . $1 . •- .
.104' t ' ....- '
I
,
z?, ;.". _ r .i:elitoi i .,,
'Ave r) i ,.... -
A,A
, l
, .
..... rD .
I I*
t .
. Ait!df '
CD -...
. ig 4,'t ' • ..,
x.- • 7 41' . .--
..?
, '''' fi,4k.lig. ";." ili ''''L .• •4
,fr''''.
.1144110.0k 41;': •-.' ,t - - ' • .• * i'41r-, ,
•
, .,,, • „...
,... _ , ,• -il
- ,
—I •
*
UT ' s
1111.116 et 7 , ‘ 'L:.
° r ., .
' ' •' .
. . .,_,,
—1 -‘, .% - ' " • A 0 1 . . r•. ',/,
-4i. " : Olt , ... - ' lia . .. 14
....
v.w. .
. ,
•
,, • , ' . I '., 3, , ,4
7 .. 4111P.' ,•1
- ' .. • c,.. -4 -- 1 ... .s, .
--< -. ' ... '
--.-
y• .'
I!. P , ,Firt VI',
0 --
: •_ 41t-
■• , *Pr, if awl" . . v• . v. .. „,,
7ii -:.f• f' •• ,
P. '\,,,,.. '.• .
.. . „ , 4.1", . •
I • - ,, -1.4 ' - '-' i
, .:. • F-1 . . /it . ..„ a.4 ' , •',.'it# 111 'r:i.:4;..•,,,•„ it , .... f f . '.giv ,•• .,
, . .
. .
i , -. - ..11-t-A .... • ..",
ifffIts • .
—ti ...
... r
14...i:.. ,.....000-* ),.. . a...3
. • . -.. ., k. .11:1:__ ....._ -7.■-, ' II
/ 4'-.., ",mir 11111).-
.
0 74,14 . '. • • :, , ' -
. „ . ..
' 4. .'' -----•7'...., 'L.: .'
. ".... ,e_ . .,,_,tir .-. - ■•••■:
,
,, , , . , , : .
.4 s , i . . 41-8
,, .,
. L ._ fc„ .
..,, / „.• ,,, . fL• '".;,, -
. • - ,,
.- k •IPe-• -V
'
) .„ oilip. . . iliorr, -, ,oh 1
• Mop- .,
Ci) I. v - '0"- • 4
• ii■ , -,i,\ -, . \ / . . " N. ... N, .: f ,fatilii. .:4.' • -
• . . •
• .. _ - . itti
• ', - - . - \-, . ° • et . : -
..•...
. 44' - - (..• .•„4 •.,
•
11 I
TIGARD ' s
Trail by the Rail
Design Concepts
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
' ' r' c 1 L —
.4 449w1.1"G
r- _ , t : .. it co
e
R. -.. µr t .".I '.. '�`r ed` _. 0 , +,., SZ
g 3 ` R W
; so, .- U
'.; • i r t"- 44 A.
.r it �. v Via, ` • * ' A.
ti k. I "• .•.1• ice* - . R . * '.
at
144
(gyp - ..1_ _ '�Al*..... t
i
a � _
�y y 1 y . .
irt.
_Q
...... ;_... -4.,-.. . ‘ .. i, ... - . , ,,*, - i . —, ..„..„.. _
, ..._. . . ..... . _,: . , 4 _ , .L.I. ft ..21,_..4/ i/
Ittci'L 4.'"
i
iii*, ., . 1. 171. i , Iii,,A , , _ .,.,,t-,
0i•, .
� "" '-�Rr 1F � r �.
Nit ' _
' 1y � + J + „• , 41?''88 1,: . i. )
i!oici
it'''' '' ' ' .- --, '.-- !hi, . r. ')-. 4‘4. 4' ' ' N.
.ifor„,
.. . .,, .11.7, ... . 1, ):1"c! 0; • .
c 41: '
'� 1 '
I. -' , a
'S' ,%
a_
PIN r r � e ' i vl1 1. • ' A w
F
f. f y U
LI■I 10
.I. } __ 4,
O tar -a;: , ) tS .• > Q
, O
a 0 4: 4 W
Sri* ( ce
4....., ., .
7 �' ''S
•
cll
r. ,
r
Js.
0
•
ky). .12r _ ....' `-'-' - *is(' ; .
}
.4.4"
.• - _a,. , 7 , , may f-e
` , '
ticil,
-I, / 4\1 ...
-11.., j
t L:,x _ )•
•'�. ... ice., Wr / .,.2*.! i! / I
. ' co/ is a. . , ./1,r
.44 t4,, - / '
•1 x /;cv 111,..0it le41 .,IF A, lk
�� i� L
i
All II MO ..
, 4 • .
;,-: '. u
''r r —7.6
•, �' L.L1 01
, _
—p ! J y „ , P`. i ' ^.� ��
fY
,, ! i' ' .' I Ps.,-..,41,40 r, t _..
•
1
The Trail By The Rail
showcases
Tigard's unique history, environment and community !
Three Design Concepts
1
1
Boardwalk Nature walk Art walk
, i ir, ,-.. ti„, :-.I.:-...„....„ • .
Y
t t
�' s'� w 4yr 3"a 8- ate3•
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
Boardwalk in Tigard
s �r ` �` # L� $}4 `.,:1. }4, ,fit , 1�'.1.04'1{ A 40 fi• tt / .-f•
4 lit
, f
'.., Aft , — Oh
Ilk a g t y •.'� f. lik.�� .`, � �; s• !" , Y
.: , :a ary t�4
� �4..� x t .
I.
mit
'''iif
r
%• _ - _I 1
t wig omo A a., _� AID `.....
... .._..... _ _41r, ,,
.4.. , ....... .........„„„,...„..._
_......„..........
...
\ \
'`....411V
, = ." 7 / fararlig4r7—
r
RESOLVE
ARCH+IT-CTLJ
Boardwalk Trail by the Rail concept
, �.
. .,
........„
., .:,,r V•
Ill •
4 is} :�• - ;I
few 4
7
•
' • •-1.t - -"-- 1 I t J ‘ \
, ,�, . i I � ' III ' A
�'1..
I
0 413' \ \\ • \
, . , , ir , ; , , , •
, , A. , .. .
i , ii. i i ; I : ii.; 141Pr -
Alb' 1
1.4,... '.\,•‘_\.......f.`
I/i I ..
111 \ .•
,,, :,,R.w ,. ,,
1
bp• MIT.I.,- ,_, - in III''' -: '•';',f..."- ,Iirtlicjeril•:::: '' . . , , ',
'-1. .I'T".... .i.' 'I; &es ..'
P
4 ,
1
i ` f 1� i
1 \ \ .
\ ,
_ . -- -
RESOLVE
A
Boardwalk Concept Trail by the Rail
IIIP
f - PROS
1', 4 • Perception of safe and inviting
,r • Consistency with other boardwalk trails
f ,± • Elevated and protected from cars
• Minimum disturbance of ground
• Simplicity of materials
. - Easy to integrate with art and text
• A defined trail area
ESC
. - CONS
• Natural deterioration of wood
• Easy to vandalize
• May have slippery areas in rain
• Dogs may need to be leashed to prevent
wandering off
• Plants from below coming through
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
.., .
'?"'.,-,,,.•' 'tailt.m.', :14itlif ...F_
Nature in Tigard ‘ i. 'Imo ea. 1M'I .2
giSt%4` 1-',11.1t..4:4,1 •--
. 7
. ,
Columbia v„
■TI ..,..:0
River Basalt _ .. . . ...,..
., ' -,--,.,_-1,-"x'''‘' •4.`.,,, -; ■ '-':^;:::"Cgt?
I
\i,,,I.... V.,.,,':- o-n- Ic• ,+nn f....J.)::-.,t.,..., ,.v.g,g,,,,,„ , Boring Lava
4-47-4..e.f.5, _ ,..,1
-',-- 1 ''ii..' .--*. ;.- -..
.,. t
1
btn.,V,,f,
—
- — ,
.,'"- ".- •:.+ -' - , 0--cc
. .
1: -_ . •Ai• '' '1" *.°';''
IC
a / '
"...t,
_
Map of the Tualatin Valley,OR showing the geology and the , - .,• v fve
location of the representative wells and springs c. 1942 ,J,--,--ks-4,37.7.-v.-. ;:„ ' ,, ,4/'"I '
.ATER4SUPPLY PAPER
PLATE 3
_
Hillsboro ' ',--=.3 rd •
Cooper Mt. Bull Mt. ,
Petes Mt.
! a . ---
...
United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Geologic Section of The Tualatin Valley,OR
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + .
Nature Walk Trail by the Rail
alk
Concept
_. . . .
- -,-)„,,, ,
_...... i
...„.„.._
_ , #. N•11.` •.\,•\-i.'1,. '''', *.".--,.to~-.;:. =
I 1 11 ,
• , N.,.1&,,,,..-:, - -t...•----1"3.,,c-•4!t,...;,*,::., .,
fjr. r I ,
,:--•,,.....,:,, ,!- .„...-A‘:it!'',V"... -44 .', • b../..,
• ...
-el—jr
- . ;":-.-`..'.„:',4N-r''" ;-,-...•„...--4,-*`- '7i." 'c"'-9•-.:..'
.E4r--/
., -., ....4-t,, . ..--.. •.,: 4..--•, sp 1.1,.„..,...eqq.-,,,.- -
,..iis' . •■ •.',-,N,,,,,.,•"". ".".., -,,1' ‘, .•,.',,1. .j.,t,..!;,...;''•, '.././r,.._ ....,-.74;9. /---
- -,''''. '43.Y:';',,,,,■. ?"::-.:-Z''.;:t.'....*#:.;4',. '.",.--'''. . 4,..7V,„, '' 'ii C) -..,_.,..,
l ' .'... .''. .7.?ce...,..c .'"*--..-,,..•.Kers.,,t4- ::',....N '-- -------__ `7€1/A• ' 7 e.
...
' i; , •...,.-aitti Oro t .,.... . .....,, ---. -1?/, ..„ _.,_ --
). 1
iv' , r• -.-- ,t-Z.*Z' :',',X!'n'''''';',•
... .
.. •• ,.. , ,
8 4*7 . . --..r. •0<*tori.,..,,,;,----.'"'•. , To scv:vtiv-7.-ricitne... - v ,5" .
... ' „i',•"-,. .•", -;•, ,-, ' -..• ,- - -',::..• '
',....:-. - .
„ .. . , _. . . . 7,•e/.S/A.4.2''''7-''''---s,,,.' —
......, •
... 0'. - . ' • -- .-• - .„ • .
..p
•
.. _
-,
..- i •,...„:',;;•s.,..'„.,,,47;:--;:.-`4'.:, ",,,,,..?„-- -$:'.-7.:-.,,X;'t,'"',,i.,:', W.1,q441..,..,t4
/
•
._ . •
"al•-..4,2---- ''" .
A • - ' -- •
••• '.' '' - 41 kf 41% . , -- '''''' .'.'- ' +*14,, •,.::,,*... ::...'...'S' .:'•v.;'4-‘,7' .. :
- ^ rt• .v•..- .*.,.
.,.;z.
,'•ii:•.1--..,
...,, • ' '-..1*..1„4,110„:,c4,4,:,Nit.....t',o,,,,,,,,,,;.,;., .A,....L,.i„,-;;_':-;y:',',,,,,,,,,„„,,,,,,;,.,.;.-.-*,„..'
,. .,
. ,
--ot.. -. ...... .---
/, .....
-*-
.7•7."..14,1,‘7.4%.-.&'":77'..' ' "',,,..,.... ..4„''''N
,•..
•ligi(„.„..90,•,!.el, ‘••••' '... ' -. --•••'-'—voe.- •-••'
'; •••. `` ''f A: 1‘,_,'-'7 v,'7,.,',•-.'',.''' ,' - ''•,,,,, •,,lf,if •''' A r ti-,,
..., *
• • b-.,.-. ;
,„ '4,',.,,,,,`,•h.rgt...',....z.,'>,%,, ,.: ',.‘,--,''..,, ' '.,ts.`,,,,,;,','...5.•A64„.."'-,••-• ••,,,.",••,-('.
- -„. ....;,,,;„:.-,,,--.,,•4,,,t4T.I.0,,,,.;;;,,„:„,..i,,,z2,.1:::...,`..,-,',..;,•!,-;,..,4„,„:„.,7„,,i1±,,,,,A,,i.•:,A.,...",:::1,,,,,,,f,..;,,'•:,-,?,,,Z."11
.....
, .
4
----., -. -
• 1
- i.
...
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
Nature Walk Concept Trail by the Rail
', '� PROS
it, • Symbolic
s A • Majestic local material
M
' ,J. , = -I • Longevity
;a • Low maintenance
,_: . • Minimum need for footings
... .t • Serves as benches and obstacle course
4 • Difficult to vandalize
t tune's .
CONS
Higher cost for a polished-surface look
, - �ti • Need footings if placed vertically
,
RESOLVE
,....
, ... , .
. ..,
Art in Tigard
.
I , ,._
I , r
. ,,.. ....
-...„-.. --- ••
•
, .W
• •
. .
. .•
. _, ., • t. ' _
t .
. _
.. . ‘'''
ooti ... „Iv . - 1
. .,.,
• '
,...
1 le
'DP
r::,. •
'-
. PIP All 1'. , ''',,•• ./. -. ,. ,
- .
'.11411/11.
1 ir ......... .....1 1
.,,,17:,
--...... F. _______.....:
•,.. „. • ...„
4':-. 1 ::'' i .
ippriT ,. . , „
.. _ _....___.....„..i.„.,,,. -!.:: ..„_,....,..„...
................
, „.„.... ,„.
. ra
--- ' —
, _ ••••■••■•, ....... III! , -
. ,...:. ...
- -I -* • —
\ ' 4•.. 1 i '-'-' ' I . . * - 1 ... ,
40, —
1 & ,.1 . i
I 4, Al =,----- 7144‘" '
•:,40.-
I-•
4-•
I ( F. ',,, -Iv - -
. .. ;.. •
viii:.......:„
- P
--..„. -. . _, .... _________•• ,
RESOLVE
AR('HITF-r-`uPr + P._ANNINC,
I
,. . 1
Artwalk Concept _ xj Trail by the Rail
u
{ , 4' l� , r fs ice~ a;, N
r
S _ c 1t t').).••{1 i1 ++y�.ma�yy T:. fY � �1i � ys- .
i \ , 4 ,' /'; Ar#41,4 it I r %pi'',T farA 0.t; I : .k4. .
ii° ill
.
i
Yw r i y 1r
t
it-17_, ._., r
r
i
y
�� ..;„
. 4.
' �� F.fi , ,
-e n Ie - 1
-
i
' '' )1. Ai. •... '''i?' .
r
r, 1
-
N .:y {AL
r • ...'M yy
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
Artwalk Concept Trail by the Rail
;,. PROS, ,4.. , 0, urnmislik
• Opportunity to engage with local artisans
• Visually diverse
,. - ►i►iii, 12,,„„ • Whimsical/fun
..
• Unique
-$ ▪ Attraction
r tt • Evokes emotional connections
. �Y.
4_
7 CONS
• Expensive
• Longer public process to plan and design
- y., High maintenance
1.,^' • Need specialty lighting
• Prone to vandalism
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
Under the Bridge
,. , 7 ...,
mirer ,' -4*, .
. i.
, ...,
.......... ,,, . '. iihnifibpihth., ,, „ ,
..... . ,
. . .....
�; , Ip I -
1• ., .W.._.. ,• MOM p. iiiiiiii
II Yi4' a-3a•
I r '�
I I .. S �
"_
- 7 . ; 1.
I ,
, ,
ms r �
•• _r
�1
f �� �
^ _._ . ... � r
• ..
;✓ I, , i.. ,, ,. , - ..
_ ..,
___...
RESOLVE
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
Under the Bridge Inspiration
7s'-..:.•'1:::.:::::..
4iimuniluit
4 la
.. 211411111101
wi a iiko:41: , ..•1:) a, ;--.
,r.
ir loi
, , ,
�
I'< I.
+,
''''s■ ''`-:.'-' , i •
ne �
Y
it
a _ --i 114 f � y :�•,. `.'# I �j
' • T
RESOLVE
ARCHITFCTIJRE + PANNING
r ; r, ..
• xix '°''''$ "1
likt NM
1 0 s, a
.4° f `� ti
= . 1,4# Ai.
OY ' r , y b ,0 , :. NM
' ''' :'''''Writ" •• . 4.14•'T 11, ' . . i
,
0 - 1' . • ti ':
T a 4, /�FyJ I-
r'V n
—0 - '**I,,,,\ , , -*-- , i - , ,4 '' 1_,I, we ,'•A .J0 -IF,,,! .--
0
`t -,.' AA dll. 4:111P"
J
•
414
• 1
A;...,,c - •
, ,,t1fipi..T
,-.
i
1i h
,,. ,,
# a
r;$ ' (.
' d
t
r 1i
V i• ��i }
S. 'i- .,X-41:A33 41#44C3A'I'l 4 -*
St
- % -I.
: r r 4 'b 'r y . ' ■ fir 1
j 1 141
•
'.:.��• r■ r p 'r
.. {� ! t
q+ *4`t.t
4
•
•
- i1R r� 1! il w•v' - '
The Trail By The Rail
showcases
Tigard's unique history, environment and community !
Proposed Design Concept
TRAINS & COMMERCE
RESOLVE
AFCrii:.-C'*UPI.- + P'.:..vn:u.i;.;
Trains & Commerce The Portland, Eugene C81, Eastern Railway Company
is just oomplating
350 Miles of Electric Interurban Railways
a
, y • Willamette Valley
.,, 1.
,./g10 1 OF OREGON
•
'.—
`• rws■r 1„5 5 i t •PORTLAND P . '‘‘\',.‘•
1 • '' : •.:,•
Human Beings
. ..... OS W CGO
- ` a a„W Live Longer
in Oregon
.7 ”"° 1 - samavn•a `•'yy; • Bused upon comparisons of obituary
- P �, °•`� notices, more R'Mern Oregon people
• • •,u, r / 1 `"'" O`AL•" live to be from SO to 100 yearn old than
y s"'-" '�'^ j �II{, do the inhabitants of any other district
a; 1 r r ,s`•',_•� U=" in the Union.•
1 r
' _ • 1. �'^''"a"'• stt.vprow There are fewer epidemics of diseases
r
- - ,.l i,r"� in the'Willamette Valley than nnpwhare
r ALCM I clue on Earth.
�( 7 .-. I".2."0..T.• •ri p�v , Earthquakes, cyclones, torn:alo,w.
,r " ,n. , sweltering heat or exees,ive cold are un-
r �}_ amnitic/cn :"C'" a,,,s.,,y known in the history of the N'tlltuttette
- ,,4W. Valley
,I 1 fltr Ili ht,_ •• 1 a �e.., .7
I 11174—.., 'W.,'-,-- ,.. 1.
,.*ALBANY
- 1 \ ki-
�COIIV1I:LI :�: Why?
•�- e ths,Because the rains cleanse the;tie we
`� �^ �s. N 1 �a„,,,,.�s.•,.. strethe, and thew w:re the soil and
,, 4. streets of all disease spreading germs,14 t The water supply of the R ilhuta•ttc
•r' i w».« I AND PP.'
`i .„' J -. —�”' �. F/, � ,.,,,.,,,,.,,
Vallee comes direct from the Cascade•
__ �, `-� f ro-
wq ■ a,.,:....ta,r<..r.: tented from contamination, p
l (_�. ° `' .O ," '4 The even temperature of-ammer and
Winter seasons.
•Ny—' y �` fp- I 4 i s o or, o The case with which fanners makea
-� 11L J _1 ,(.W "' ,.'. 7" EUGCNE - living in the ttdlann't l e Malley.
JyWpll.l..C..j I - o
%C . - :. y.. You ought to see crops grow in the Willamette Valley
t l
ar -
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - DESIGN CONCEPT THEME
ARCHITECTURE + P_ANr;r-I'-
A
,r. ‘, itili, 6466rNsTos ARM cro
Trains & Commerce
Iti— IE GRANGE Nohtir; .
VI
"--A. ,p, N- vi. T.','3".*-,'''-:;...;-:- --. •-•=3.-- 8 . it ,. ir IV/
. 1 ....•it-81L..-Agiit .
• .• ,,w,....• ..- .
qimAoir
1TOCZY
, Orglinized, 4 ril 2 2,..,11..S_7_4
_--=--- .
. - ..
'
Or
. .
FII --rk 111 I 1 :-
-....:.,'"..",,. --.e— 7,-; • ' _ .•,..',' .
1
• , .
rI,.fI.'.'°o.-,,,-'■;,':'Sr,:-.- .,,:..,P 3 4!T,,,.;;!;.,.,,,i,`. ',:.,.. f _0.,'',. :
- ,
I.
:4
„„
4'.
4.4,,,,......
''xlellarlIll
Ill ii
r. ,
)... ..
4.4).•-.: ,...'.,',
• ._,t
....._
-:'—-7”1, .:.,,,.: '..•:i';',5'' ...ze=:,1, :40:": , , : '' ' .° ..r`' I";' , , , ;' „„,„.,„ ,„.,, .....„„............„„ -,„ ...„ _
. ,.. ..... ... . t ,
-.1 _ - ,..- --- . :,: ...7 n P f Illt:1 4":', 7''`, ,!'R KF, . • , ...
,
i s "
Iry
HOTEL GERMAN
IA HALL .
•
...
... •.
• .._,. ..,.
...
.......„„,„.
...
,...
.•
....
GRIMSTA
,.... . .:. . ..
IV'
Am4444"
11S4'i 1 i 1
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail
- DESIGN CONCEPT THEME
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
r•' , ,,,,. {� +� 0•,, ,/'?'4 ti/..: i, 7 *.. '
sloti.4s.
yl �, ,� tw
..r
N r . • 4. 1 rr. i i 'AE,tt 1".. ,.." 1. — 1 eil , ofe - 1- 4 . , ,
IA jai
Ty .
% ,.. . „
e:. rt a�{ t
r
��
1 ) a I.
�f
t ,
40v,
. •• /14 4 ',- • lay - •
,., ,' .,.',.4'1.-7.0,cr4,11)%'. . i 4i 4- - Lon II. '
4
a � - A '"
I • f t' >, a� .
i
.,.-- - .. '.47 r , . ui
W
i :Om ,__
- " • I - . ,, : . , ig co
' • - ' of* . 0
sc sok 0
- -
.
b A . k ,
, ..., 4 ,..
• 'v •••-•-------- - Z 11•11104
. ,. , sr •
• ., , rn ' ei Ldao.,"°117.. '
. ,
(..- e, ' lb %, . ' i e: • s. 0
r 4% , . . .. .1:
.a,‘ (..)
• . ■ ) . ,
- •
' 4 :. . i \
-
4 ' U
. .. .4 v:-.,' . ■ •
..ay., , .•.. .
1 N - 4,," \ , , ,, • fr ''At. •" <
-/-/. - .- '. `. • ' ___I
. . . . I t ,,,i• , .,pp NI, .
O■' p, . ,:` ip e.. - '-
' JO •• 1. , „op . ,f I
',,‘
I • '■ —
• .—
, . '! 0
,- f ,
.
,,
- ""' . - •
' -/ •• Ce
4,. ,, ,,. .,
(I)
. -
$1 Ihc- . j
.hi; ,b-s,,,,: 46. v• . , /I.7-.
_C
- 4 . Ix 1 ..i e '-•". . -a 'r. 4 '''' ,
- -•jiri,7 •1'ir• .•' f • *.. * 4 t ' i.4' ' 7 ' *
ilt7tit.
' I '''"ti, 1 •4,' ' ".".' ' . : / 0.11.. >''
''' P:47:. • ' .k:MO
_CD, . , .4, - p • "t A
. . L ,, . '
:`. „k 4k(,,!P
v", •1, ' fl* /1 , ' ,i1L. . . 1. ,
° ' - ".14)44 it. Jr' III ' •' A 4 'TIN‘
■*I 4Pt 7-7
, 1 , ,.„„ , „ ik . :04 .... I •
' . , 4 •••• , -- - 1 ' - '
j?'
t -ir . 1:
L, • ile. - .3 pi ' • '‘ '''.; 1° ,-.; 44","
i
t 1 1. 4 ()".
1.,
.■ ., ' (1.'*
. .
, _ '-A -_ •
uw
.1,.....,
44•41
I • • . . _.. -. ...
• or.,•
al .,e■",
'
g. . . .
. - .
,- •
..,..
..a. , .
•'.'•
•f .., . 0
. . :.4.• .. -7
'=-
ik ilil
: -
IP'' "■....„,.. ....1.1,,,,,.-' .',
II
a_
en . • - 1. ,
. i •
„41 IMO . - .' -. ," • . •
, .
44' :• • . y• , 15
- I
' - 41"
UJ u
. ,
, • 0
- . • .,!',......t - .-.
'' -
liplepf,,), •'. ,,,., ,It: :liP .. A • . t '
..' , II
:.'"- " * ■"CI .1 ■•,. '..^?' , , i, .,' , 00-,. , 0
-• . ' A jo 1 t )4'1' Vlb' f i 'T ‘.,
liTir
...e • ,, i .1,,.‘A‘ ,, Ai x,. .. ,.„, ,, :.,. )
--- 2." v
t -(••4 ,.,,,f., . it 0 i'I. It ...%
LLJ
CY-NW", ).- . ' . 0-.'t."`o• .,„:imr" 4-'.. - - ' ),*.....,.. ,... , ,. ,_ ..„, , _
., .,.:„.... .,„...,•,....
..L., ''':i'.'..i.,•- Q. , i, - -
I
, -
••• �. - _
, •
.4 •it rn �i. -, .k '•
0
•
rn . . I ,
a.
p _/ e I' �i.
%
-t) eft! . .,.r '04., . w.A, '
INZIkil 14 4*.
APP
r t
P f ' i 4. ... —E•
.r t-1t ,, •
if so
f / ' ' • ' L,,,,,F�
( 1 _
--% ..4 li-' .
•
a .
1
.4.-
r
f
■
0 M . , ' i * T -9
•
{
F
I ` •
() T
� —3
O fD �.
p fD
x-
‘i,, ,
• --*- mamma Wit W111114LasilL:t ' "';1 '- . 111; . .,-,• •livi.,,
-4
".::::.',.#.4,;.:r:j:k :''"4",...:1''..0,,. 4 ■it.'' ..,11&i::: 4 'yt;.q.,;?ITr', :.$1'1 i' ' i,.;!''';:i,.f.l.t4/1..
'''' '''•..i 1 '',,,':',''lkii, ' '• . -:.'.5,,k1 '':...4•••,::',4..1k•' ‘, ... )'k-11',.,,,..,,.,,
.'• . .,..f.:Ati...y''..,., l,f;:'
. :
'44-'s-, ,,
, 1: . . ?i1 0
I * 0
. ) .1•.
i :
LLJ
:-,,,•.,,,,.: r.- :--) , ;1 ,.,, I-
* - —...---2- 7-7-7 v)
,,-, .. t,.,.• , • ,,, .1 „„, „ie. , .,, ,,,,t,ir raw Th&.....S.,
?I',,i,j4i ,..4'.
/ LLJ
A ,..Ariv .. 1:
r —11%.,/itlait
I
,, ; 1"' A •.,'..;•,,,....-,....,.. . .r1„ , • ..,,',..,,,,:,-
•' .:q:r....„..L..,.. ., ,,•,01, , ,
,_..
i \ 'is •' 1-.-,..- ...,,
0
_,. •..,;•):::,,,,,li..„„,,,,..1.,..„.z
1----i,1
', •, '-4.,' 'A•Nqat.,..,t;;; - .,,•.:. , • a)
i F. or, 'iii.:.,. .'2',y. ii,.:.1'"Allt)i.''.•'',''#,,.'a,,,,s;. , , ., '_.,..
vi , . , , .• .,,,, • ..., •
, . .:, - . '. 5.'(!,.;i1 .4 •-,`Y.4'°"" -
-I-
, , , ,,„. ,,..,.,, .■,..., • AO >.'
# ' "! ',•, '. ..lit III . 4..,,.7°
, --- ir'- •-.*,s, glk 11 .... . . ''';L' • •
. ,.
1
- :..,__sl-.,-: f . •
1 -, ..:,' I)! 4.i •'
'—
t. ''''t, i ''-!:1'" "''..?„.; ', .,„ '', . ,',' .'''•_:,.'41,,..°:`t ... '''''' 0
—, . '. ■,! 1.,li:`'' '',;',
41 •i. iiii..1 .,,. . -_ t 4, . ,I:iit-7. :•• • .
I-
. i il ot■; -1 ''' L.--'''',: '',, '''1. 4.ft4 .
r I .,.,
.'•:: r '':-.,-1 ''' . - ' 4111k..: ' ':, ':., I:. \A, i.,':
•.,... ..-;•.,..„_.„-,.t...,,
Cf,\k•ZTAW,,,et
11 .:: li ''-i etS'''..2" 'V-•
: ,,• ••• -;v.. .. ilL • .-_ .. . - .- „, •' ... . ':, ,i. ' ,,.`
.. ,
•
•,i .... . I .
!, ,- -. • •-v ,1,-.„•'4-
, . 40,,,,: ......,,,,,
..
• .......- ----
'Itit:l.'''',1
T . , . ( f
.,. '
. ?: , s \ • .. *I'''.-:
/ .
,4
— .
. $2 ,
_ .. ., _.. .
• ,, . .. , ,L , i
- .
\ ..:
• Ill 1
,
.v.:
f ,
71; • ,.,., ,d , \ ..1,
• :: ,. - ',, .'.', ' ',.-,:\ ,, ‘ •'. „,
,_.
• .,, , z
■ ■ .1
L.J
( )
, ----- --• .
F-
. '
..,. '
.' 0 \ ■ \ >
7 ) 1. ,
\
, \ —J
0
Li .1
../ ,.. t". . .; LLJ
CI!
. .
; .-i•-* - •
. .... - ,,. , • si:
. . ..
• 4,4 .4 . , ' .1
'
04 4`.•:. 'v.'0'. ' il° I "I
,,,, ,./
fY
UJ
7--1 , cult ,-1�� .aG
4 _ -$R , 1
.".1) '‘ --•i'. IOW 1;:tei:-. --'7":11-111111411111.111111‘ I--
1 1 '4 01410111:"*- .11; - ' . .• 'Aii SZ
IF
4 ijfj ^/...../
'T'' (• ....a..- .
LL
:t.. .0 ill I
l r
1 .# 1, till i _ , 1--
II a
It. lik «04.'4 42,-,, ". ' , (Z
, i . filoh, .‘,.„./ ,. ti/t(...4..._. : -',.>
Ii .
.,
�,, �--�'
. , ,,s3t j
te,.v • 4 - ii_,7,.L i \ \
G. \ 0 AWillillilli '14:1
IU I
\,1III II w �1 + li . ,' y`
2•
�•a
k inhi :wtir,40,1„',.1 ,,,,.. . , ... ' i� � 11II IIIIIIg � Z Z Q
• � W
�_�.. ; ,1 ' _ - v
.‘\\-- \ III—`` %11 11 11111 I 1111lµIU+y... 91 ~ �. J
N‘ s, //1111111 "ar:,
�\ ►1111111111 1I + �, (� Q
` 1 i �� '�t.
` 1";11,1,1111111111 1 ' 11111116'
11111 '"��" f"�. �: '� ` ` ��, cn
,`` 11111111111 j1' II 111100 rj �, ° ' ,�� +
.11*‘‘‘..
` 1% 111 II,. ,,II f� ,. , ' ;" w
,,,`� 111 1111�� III. I To, , I . ` �. .!I
. ;11`111 IL I 1 CY
��. 1111►I I►t' ���I; ;' �d" � .t. . 1 .
4. 1
111111.1 -
-0-iiiiiiimagim !=iiiiii ._ ....._,
,,. sew-
-
iiimmir. ._ �.
,ter
in - i • ._ -_ r .
'.1.• _,--aror, •- ._,'_, -1F - __::4; .- Alek.-. . -;.•4- I .,,74A. - .. fr - RiCill
,_, .
A.- _ , - . ::_itaw-4 ..siet
. . _, sr, ,,....
..... . . .... , ,.. ,....„ ,. .
, _ .
- . _,, _.... ,. ., ..., . ,_ .,,_:,.,. . ..,.., ,'',. • uu -.,..
•-• r. - 11"4") '41...,., -----•--- , '- ::' ' - --.4 -.4 ,---
.
ter.: _ .__
AIM 1 f
-- , " . � -- yes+ 41*-f<
.... ...
( � 'r'y'a.-,
R E S O v E Trail by the Rail - AN OUTDOOR ROOM
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
T ■
'1
‘1,-...".
,. nalidCra
I I FAMIty 1 7 •
- ......,
-. ..............*
) • .k
.... ?
1 1 . Sc 7 I, ! I I s WEI lit . t.
i V
41'; IIEW
LLCM
.1 • ,' , .t.-
.......e
1-0; ti... . p De. r . . .. . •.•,•
, ...
"
,- -
.. .0*
,
i.,
' I „ - ....
. . . -
, .
St 6, . _ •i
.. . ... , . _., .
-4 " - ,........,.; j,
a . ! -- , -.
,... .. 1 IN. -- . ' ' /II%
-ri A r I c-- .•
,
_,..„0.4__..,
i .. , ..
• ,..t —— I ri
r- .
...: grofii- I
1:-
1110111.1.t . *
....,. '
• L . \ kir,
_ ... tie/ . 1 /1 t. .v---At,Ad..,tip.po„t■Vws ,...
Ill i • 4..,,....410.*Fru_.! , - _ _.- ,Z .
- _ —
.0.........m.........
''.
II ......„........_,..
1 ---........ 1 00.0............,.*;
1 ve,......wata I 11111.0*.e-wl,.re , ma"..., . . ...
'.' . r."'•I.' .0 1
i i "Il
t..........••••,.........,:•■•■•.."••• ••■•••••••01.11%,,,,,,. , .„,t.'•••••••■••••••••••••
•••••••7,............:••>.: "...11111-.., .rIrirj .. 4,0"---. •$
, .......- ..
...t..........:.,,„.................-.----............-$$$,,,,,, _ r
....„,,,_
,, ,,........7.1.14:.. it .....„........,.. 4.
figH' (0 4, 0 tr\e:,.;,•\.■''' \P.'
t'•••..I.- 1.41 .....,.. 1
. t f
•
q'
'N;h1411110; ."-\■■•■__Ill ' ' \..Q. ,II
, 1,_ 0,-• lk Tilt It
■k...........„....N....::„......„...„
i ., 0 . Ci
7 11,,
ii
II
9 t....,
, r iii ;j..•
i 4
...n .
114tn
. IF ( -\, ' ": ' ■•■••■•• 0 .
• . *\I\ -,''' fly ,Iy. . • ' .......,, I
. • tir,..4"t"..----./..,.. .
/ / —4,-7.. 4. . A, 4 St 1.1, '7.k."7 If • -'1.4.k1/4114). ; 1)111:k 'IP .
r% ' • 1:41"Or,4%OP.. 7 k,,,.%*1:'
..............„.... . .. ■ . ' 4. 1
/ N
....\'''''''',..,,.............. -..............
. --,....._,
-....
(
.... ...................
---.--'••••••••........,_ OA 137 ' ‘'.-I4e
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - FARMERS MARKET
• . ;.sr ; . , ,;• ,j, ,•
• r. L�
•• 4` 4, '0.4.:'4 ` A� � I.. 4;-' .,....A., 1 ,4.- ,t .f_ars.„.4...! \i‘,. i„:1,,A.S
,.
,„..,
"t•
. , .4.401.• 40•••••• 4.4" \'‘,711111r, ,_,,„,, r,''•:' -4 ...i.;..: . ap. 1 i it t 1 \ {
1., \ • • • - • 1 t ,
\ '' ■ w
t.
I \ '..1./
N.
N.
N.
N. -11114._
-....::1/4.'1'-',.......c.c.....,...„ `444e,minhis,
//' .
•
....._ � /
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - ARTIFACTS
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
The Trail By The Rail
Plir - ,
. '''',„'‘I - ' ''''...-:;_i.:-..il t-_, ..:-.L.-'!'fiCT4';;0,,*.- ',: .
Outdoor Projections ,
... , '/I '
Evening Illuminations , •• - I. --A ' - . W.: ,
•
. , 1,I .t, 1104%10.1 '''''''.1.15:4' . '- 1 -
4VH. ..
-
\ - . • -
t a. -�
{
___ . i,..r.•;;;.',.2. ,...*.i.;',.),41''"'''''''':*: ' .,•?..ip4./ r Y , •
Ilk..j � � 1 w
... - ,. - i ...--
p
j r
� ' 7 y
R E S O L V E Trail by the Rail - EVENING OPPORTUNITIES
Ar . . .
%. r r
r ;
if Ate Q
e. "..,a 4R R"4.4...4 W
• yh. ' I-
., ^
i yy r
.. 3 fit` J' .•. -7'•',.. -C' .
'a:`, t LL
1,
R W
r
p t w ... .7.
l -,
'" 0
F-
•
J k
F
Y'.„, rr
c,
s xa a .73..A..-,:: .
{
i
t f 3 sf am' ' r }
t 1�1 .} r
-_ r � ' �P l 1
:. 6
*tot
_ is Z
} , ; - Z
y� Q
Vpf U
•
.r r� -'• ; fir. f ' 4.4•'''.- r..
LU..,,, , ,, •-,',-,,,A ... , .',T.C.' ::'.- #..=-:e'r. .
•
►� „ t
¢ 1 ,
k ,
.i t
„lee yle
i.....
c._.. ..„. t.
ikiks,
. r
i irl . .e...,,,. ‹•,----:. c.
..1 .'” Ai (
,d, is"I
7„,.
„„,...:k......._.....t,
4
,,,...
,
. •,, - t. , . •,.• .
•,
r - - .. 1 ,. I ,i Nt • . . tt
. I •
...
, ‘
9114
. . •151PIMP . ' .4 AN (4 ...._ ,
4 .
. _. . . ........... . „, klz 24, _ 1/4$, '-•Air .'" . .
21:1_,
lr
,,;
. . IV
..,
. . . ..,_
. - ,
t'; m ..
) . _.--...'ty ,. -.....
. ( -
&Inn 2 4 1111.WIli i . •- \
X ...
_
1 _1 \
N.
...._...
. ---„N
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - WEST PLAZA
ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING W
.-- .....
CIPM IV !
. ,,,,
. . .„,„ - ,_ . „. . --, ,
,
....
. ...
. lk, I
-
._. ._ .
: -
..
7, •
- • .... .
7...7.4. Illi
.100.40 I .• ..
I 4.0
.-. , iirriii dar 4iip am
I l'I Or 41111° 4.416 ' = • ,.-i ii, '
' , *atillb * , .., ■ 70
i
... 40....10
'VP
, ,... ....
'
/.. P‘
•:411"
„ l„. • w/ ',rat .._
.„ , •*411
•,.
. , .
elP,4• 4- , ... , , , a ._. „,._.. _. ._
..,
„ ,„...1. ,..t,,,,./..„0-1,:,...,„„.. ,....., ,,,,,... . .,.. . ..,J., , •,. ,•
.._ . ._
*A...,,, ,•,,,A., li.V. p,..,",0 A”yi 4.!,4,---..- s,.- -,L. - - .
-g. . . Pc..t.. ,/,:ie"..,1'. i,ki:., .,,-; • k. - - . . . . -
^"%,'"' 1 .•
, ---.7, .,.,... ...........................„ .-1 . 1 - ..
• ...,-.. . __,......
.-
' .-...- ' -----;.>-..--'----, : i ..,. /.. •'
,... '-e-s--: --'-7.`•-■,,_ ,
\ -4---
...---,..
........ , . , .
, ---- LI;='• '------- '" - '
. ,-- *-.. ... .
----• -----...,.. ...?...,,, -
.2 ... . "c....",..'''..,.. '-., •
. ,,...
... `.,_ .
-.-.... .
••••••—"N ■■•
\ ..
• "
■ ‘,....V" ... .. .
1
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - TRAIL SURFACE
ARC
2
CO
aJ .0 Q
CIO U -I-) 0
0
O C Q
CL U li U 0
3-
In
U
s. ., s O
,,,r lib: . .''', 1 • _ -- .,,'4 tiorillor,,!(4,4 4
1
or
r . 4. t--bi twit
'or-
ar
Ys M ' • , . i
N.
• / : ,,,,
r �+1r _ <, a
� . �-& _ • 4
� . .� . +
N. S
(.)
•
' J
1111111 .
, W
ce
•w . '
...
TRAIL BY THE RAIL Tigard, OR
Project Resources
Tigard Historical Association
• Martha Worley
• Valri Darling
• Yvonne Brod
Alex Craghead
Oregon Rail Heritage Center / National .
Railway Historical Society
• Ron McCoy
• Arlen Sheldrake
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon Department of Transportation
• Christopher Bell
• Mike Shippey
Tigard Public Library
RESOLVE Trail by the Rail - CONCEPT DESIGN @ 75%
AIS-2088 4.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 01/20/2015
Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes
Agenda Title: Council Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2015/2016
Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson Submitted By: Norma
Alley, City
Management
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Meeting Type: Council
Staff Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Should Council submit the attached draft budget figures as their proposed budget for FY
2015-2016.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Review and discuss the attached draft budget figures; forward any changes to Joanne
Bengtson to update the document.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Council's travel training allowance was amended in FY2010-2011.
The fee for the Oregon Ethics Commission was added to Council's budget.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
This is the first draft of Council's budget requests.
Attachments
Draft FY15-16 Council Budget
FUND 100 City of Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
93,310 Existing Staff Approved
0 Approved
47,526 84,971 30,802 84,375 51001-Salaries-Management 93,310 Approved only
47,526 84,971 30,802 84,375 Total Personal Services-Salaries 93,310
Run 1/13/2015 11:50:49 AM Page 1 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City o Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund
Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
468 Existing Staff Approved
669 1,185 370 1,014 52001-Unemployment 468 Approved only
0 Approved
221 Existing Staff Approved
200 507 188 186 52002-Worker's Compensation 221 Approved only
0 Approved
7,139 Existing Staff Approved
3,739 6,620 2,386 6,456 52003-Social Security/Medicare 7,139 Approved only
0 Approved
674 Existing Staff Approved
337 611 223 610 52004-Tri-Met Tax 674 Approved only
13,063 Existing Staff Approved
0 0 0 0 52005-Retirement 13,063 Approved only
3,000 Existing Staff Approved
0 0 0 0 52007-VEBA-ER 3,000 Approved only
2,655 Existing Staff Approved
0 Approved
0 0 0 5,310 52008-Life Ins/ADD/LTD 2,655 Approved only
0 Approved
43,378 Existing Staff Approved 1
51,289 42,176 14,254 77,107 52010-Medical/Dental/Vision 43,378 Approved only
0 Approved
5,958 5,178 1,761 0 52011-Dental Benefits 0 Approved only
62,192 56,277 19,182 90,683 Total Personal Services-Benefits 70,598
Run 1/13/2015 11:50:50 AM Page 2 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Ti and Oregb on DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
800 meeting supplies(cups,coffee,filters,clorox wipes,plates) .Base Approved
paper,pens,etc.
739 93 0 800 53001-Office Supplies 800 Approved only
739 93 0 800 Total Supplies 800
Run 1/13/2015 11:50:50 AM Page 3 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
6,500 Consultant fee for coaching and 2 meetings for Council .Base Approved
team building
400 Inpterpreter Services for hearing impaired at Council .Base Approved
meetings(upon request)
2,640 TVCTV taping of Council workshop meetings .Base Approved
9,808 9,974 4,060 9,540 54001-Professional/Contractual Services 9,540 Approved only
0 Approved
27,651 City Attorney legal support for Council-based on trends .Base Approved
32,393 21,310 4,882 27,651 54003-Legal Fees 27,651 Approved only
0 Approved
25 Council's use of pool vehicles for close-in travel. .Base Approved
0 0 0 25 54115-Vehicle Usage 25 Approved only
0 Approved
5,951 1,815 1,033 0 54205-Utilites-Phone/Pager/Cells 0 Approved only
0 Approved
37 0 0 0 54300-Advertising&Publicity 0 Approved only
0 Approved
34,239 League of Oregon Cities membership .Base Approved
(based on what we paid LOC for 2014/15 dues)
3,813 National League of Cities membership .Base Approved
(NLC estimate-population based)
800 Oregon Ethics Commission filing dues(paid from this acct, .Base Approved
not budgeted in previous 2 years)
148 Oregon Mayors Assn dues for Mayor Cook(population .Base Approved
based)
100 Other publications for Councilors .Base Approved
100 Tigard Downtown Alliance dues .Base Approved
3,489 U.S.Conference of Mayors membership .Base Approved
2,500 Vision Action Network membership(Action Member .Base Approved
status)
5,044 Westside Economic Alliance membership .Base Approved
(Based on billing from 7/22/14)
48,649 39,059 13,604 48,891 54302-Dues&Subscriptions 50,233 Approved only
0 Approved
Run 1/13/2015 11:50:50 AM Page 4 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Ti and Ore on DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
1,100 Business meals that are outside regular council meetings .Base Approved
(Mayor only)
(WEA forums,meetings with Metro and other
jurisdictions,regional Mayor's dinner)
1,400 Council meals before regularly scheduled Council meetings .Base Approved
20,000 Councilors training budget-$5,000 per councilor .Base Approved
9,000 Mayor's training budget for conferences and meetings .Base Approved
27,330 25,338 2,332 31,500 54303-Travel and Training 31,500 Approved only
0 Approved
600 Recognition,awards,florist(funeral,illness)from Council. .Base Approved
Promotional items for visiting dignitaries and school age
visitors.
5,000 State of the City Reception .Base Approved
444 1,909 164 600 54311-Special Department Expenses 5,600 Approved only
124,612 99,405 26,075 118,207 Total Services 124,549
235,069 240,746 76,059 294,065 Total Requirements 289,257
235,069 240,746 76,059 294,065 Total Mayor and Council 289,257
Run 1/13/2015 11:50:50 AM Page 5 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
" City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: Mayor Cook and Honorable Councilors
From: Joanne Bengtson, Exec. Asst. to City Manager & Mayor
Re: Updated Draft Budget for FY15-16
Date: January 15, 2015
Attached you will find a copy of Council's revised FY 15-16 budget. It contains
accomplishments based on the final goal update for 2014 Council Goals as well as
corrected figures tied to Council's technology stipend, vehicle stipend and benefit
packages.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me, Marty or Liz a call.
Page 1 of 1
FUND 100 City of Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund
Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
93,310 Existing Staff Approved
0 Approved
1,980 Technology Stipend-Cell phones at$33 per month .Base Approved
16,500 Vehicle Stipend-$275 per month .Base Approved
47,526 84,971 30,802 84,375 51001-Salaries-Management 111,790 Approved only
47,526 84,971 30,802 84,375 Total Personal Services-Salaries 111,790
Run 1/15/2015 10:46:24 AM Page 1 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
468 Existing Staff Approved
669 1,185 370 1,014 52001-Unemployment 468 Approved only
0 Approved
221 Existing Staff Approved
200 507 188 186 52002-Worker's Compensation 221 Approved only
0 Approved
7,139 Existing Staff Approved
3,739 6,620 2,386 6,456 52003-Social Security/Medicare 7,139 Approved only
0 Approved
674 Existing Staff Approved
337 611 223 610 52004-Tri-Met Tax 674 Approved only
13,063 Existing Staff Approved
-13,063 Council not eligible for retirement Approved
0 0 0 0 52005-Retirement 0 Approved only
3,000 Existing Staff Approved
-3,000 Council not eligible for Veba Approved
0 0 0 0 52007-VEBA-ER 0 Approved only
0 Approved
2,655 Existing Staff Approved
-2,655 Council not eligible for Life/ADD/LTD Approved
0 C 0 5,310 52008-Life Ins/ADD/LTD 0 Approved only
0 Approved
43,378 Existing Staff Approved
19,857 Councilor Goodhouse Health Benefits .Base Approved
51,289 42,176 14,254 77,107 52010-Medical/Dental/Vision 63,235 Approved only
0 Approved
5,958 5,178 1,761 0 52011-Dental Benefits 0 Approved only
62,192 56,277 19,182 90,683 Total Personal Services-Benefits 71,737
Run 1/15/2015 10:46:24 AM Page 2 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
I
FUND 100 Cit of Tiand Oregon DIVISION: 0500
Y o g g
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
800 meeting supplies(cups,coffee,filters,clorox wipes,plates) .Base Approved
paper,pens,etc.
739 93 0 800 53001-Office Supplies 800 Approved only
739 93 0 800 Total Supplies 800
Run 1/15/2015 10:46:24 AM Page 3 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Tigard Oregon on DIVISION: 0500
General Fund g Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
0 Approved
6,500 Consultant fee for coaching and Council training .Base Approved
400 lnpterpreter Services for hearing impaired at Council .Base Approved
meetings(upon request)
2,640 TVCTV taping of Council workshop meetings .Base Approved
9,808 9,974 4,060 9,540 54001-Professional/Contractual Services 9,540 Approved only
0 Approved
27,651 City Attorney legal support for Council-based on trends .Base Approved
32,393 21,310 4,882 27,651 54003-Legal Fees 27,651 Approved only
0 Approved
25 Council's use of pool vehicles for close-in travel. .Base Approved
0 0 0 25 54115-Vehicle Usage 25 Approved only
0 Approved
5,951 1,815 1,033 0 54205-Utilites-Phone/Pager/Cells 0 Approved only
0 Approved
37 0 0 0 54300-Advertising&Publicity 0 Approved only
0 Approved
34,239 League of Oregon Cities membership .Base Approved
(based on what we paid LOC for 2014/15 dues)
3,813 National League of Cities membership .Base Approved
(NLC estimate-population based)
800 Oregon Ethics Commission filing dues(paid from this acct, .Base Approved
not budgeted in previous 2 years)
148 Oregon Mayors Assn dues for Mayor Cook(population .Base Approved
based)
100 Other publications for Councilors .Base Approved
100 Tigard Downtown Alliance dues .Base Approved
3,489 U.S.Conference of Mayors membership .Base Approved
2,500 Vision Action Network membership(Action Member .Base Approved
status)
5,044 Westside Economic Alliance membership .Base Approved
(Based on billing from 7/22/14)
48,649 39,059 13,604 48,891 54302-Dues&Subscriptions 50,233 Approved only
0 Approved
Run 1/15/2015 10:46:24 AM Page 4 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
FUND 100 City of Tigard, Oregon DIVISION: 0500
General Fund Mayor and Council
YTD Revised Requested Chg Pkg
FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2015 Budget Resource Summary 2016 Assumptions
1,100 Business meals that are outside regular council meetings .Base Approved
(Mayor only)
(WEA forums,meetings with Metro and other
jurisdictions,regional Mayor's dinner)
1,400 Council meals before regularly scheduled Council meetings .Base Approved
20,000 Councilors training budget-$5,000 per councilor .Base Approved
9,000 Mayor's training budget for conferences and meetings .Base Approved
27,330 25,338 2,332 31,500 54303-Travel and Training 31,500 Approved only
0 Approved
600 Recognition,awards,florist(funeral,illness)from Council. .Base Approved
Promotional items for visiting dignitaries and school age
visitors.
5,000 State of the City Reception .Base Approved
444 1,909 164 600 54311-Special Department Expenses 5,600 Approved only
124,612 99,405 26,075 118,207 Total Services 124,549
rn ‘ a �'.�e ,w,*�, e,w .a`�" " "_' "w" ,e ," e^,n s"," "
235,069 243,746 76,059 294,065 Tots)Requirements 308,876
235,069 240,746 76,059 294,065 Total Mayor and Council 39.876
Run 1/15/2015 10:46:24 AM Page 5 of 5 1000500 Mayor and Council
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
PROGRAM RESULTS:
• Basic city services provided to citizens are cost-effective and are delivered without
interruption.
• Tigard's interest in regional and statewide activities is coordinated with appropriate
agencies and
jurisdictions.
• Tigard citizens are involved in the community and participate effectively.
• Programs and activities are available in the community to meet the needs of a diverse
population.
• External and internal city assets are well managed and utilized.
• Master plans, management and fiscal policies are adopted; resources are allocated to
position Tigard for the
future.
• The community is engaged and connected to the city's strategic vision.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
The Mayor and City Council provide the legislative and policy leadership for city government.
The Mayor and Councilors are elected by citizens for four-year terms on a non-partisan basis
and serve part-time. The Council hires the City Manager to run day-to-day operations. The
City Council reviews, revises and adopts city laws and policies and sets the overall direction of
the city.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
FY 2014-2015:
COUNCIL GOAL 1: Water
Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership
• Negotiate/proceed with water purchase from Lake Oswego
• Renegotiate LOTWP Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA)to reflect structure and management
post-construction(evaluate future of partnership roles)
• LOTWP bond sale(#2)
•Monitor progress of construction and budget;LOTWP projects operational
Develop Willamette River Water Sources
•Rewrite WR WC member contract
• Continue to consider other sources:Sherwood, TVWD(studies)
• Develop "roadmap"for Tigard's future water decisions through 2026
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
Intergovernmental Water Board
• Work plan for,and next governance agreements with, Tigard Water District, Durham, King City
(expires 2017)
Communicate with Tigard residents about rate impacts/outreach regarding potential
increases
MILESTONES:
• Bond rating and bond sale #2 is scheduled for January/February 2015
• Water project construction is underway on all but one pipe schedule; program is scheduled to
be completed—on budget—in early 2017.
• Council received an update on Willamette River water supply activities in the 12/11/14
Council Newsletter.
• Willamette Supply Project (WSP) Preliminary Program final report scheduled for June 2015.
Staff is awaiting final report before making recommendations regarding future water supply
options for Tigard. WSP staff will be briefing Council in March 2015 regarding project
updates.
• Tigard is participating in the Willamette Water Treatment Plant Master Plan project via
memo of understanding (MOU) scheduled to start February 2015. Completion date February
2016.
• Willamette Governance Group (WGG) is an ad-hoc group of seven agencies meeting to
discuss governance issues for an expanded Willamette River water supply system. Staff will
brief Council on a "bridge" MOU in February 2015 to continue efforts for all parties to agree
to governance, maintenance and operation, asset use and ownership, future use of existing
assets, and proposed expansion of capital assets.
• The Willamette River Water Consortium (WRWC) will continue to function as a separate
entity until approval of a final IGA or agreement by all participants in the WGG regarding the
future of the WRWC.
• Staff will keep Council apprised of developments or actions by either the WRWC or the
WGG, as each of these programs and projects move forward in the next fiscal year.
• In December, King City and Tigard signed an intergovernmental agreement for water system
ownership and water service. A similar version of this agreement will be offered to Durham
and the Tigard Water District in 2015.
• Public Works and Utility Billing sent out postcards to all water customers regarding water
rate increases effective January 1, 2015.
• Responses to concerned customers questions and comments are being handled by Public
Works and City Management.
COUNCIL GOAL 2: River Terrace
Park land acquisition (strategy,funding, land dedication)
Complete Community Plan, zoning, adopted master plans
• Building permits issued;development begins
• Service delivery planning
MILESTONES:
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
• The River Terrace Community Plan and remaining two infrastructure master plans (parks
and transportation) were adopted in December 2014.
• A River Terrace Funding Strategy adopted December 2014.
• Implementation projects underway, e.g. stormwater modeling and design standards, code
amendments, system development charge (SDC) analysis.
• Early assistance program for development underway.
COUNCIL GOAL 3: Tigard Triangle
Complete Triangle Strategic Plan
• Adopt zoning, street and design standards
• Begin implementing plan strategies
MILESTONES:
• Developed a draft final report based upon feedback from Citizen Advisory Committee and
public open house.
• Presented the draft report to advisory committees (citizen and technical) for final review and
comment. This report included a summary of the planning process and steps for
implementation.
• Drafted a preferred plan option using the evaluation, market analysis and CAC/TAC
member feedback.
COUNCIL GOAL 4: Southwest Corridor
Determine modes and alignment for study in federal EIS process
Determine regional route segments
Participate in federal EIS process(regional partner,financial)
MILESTONES:
• Staff reviewed possible alignments through the Tigard Triangle and downtown, as updated
by TriMet.
• Staff worked on the IGA for funding the planning/environmental work that Council will
consider on January 27, 2015.
COUNCIL GOAL 5: Recreation (Evaluate options &resources to create a pilot rec
program)
Complete demand analysis for recreation opportunities
Compare recreation inventory with demand analysis to identify needs/gaps
Council decision on city role (direct delivery provider, contract/partnerships,funding
source)
• Implement a new recreation effort based on role
MILESTONES:
• The consultant,MIG, completed all scheduled meetings in early September and
recommended more analysis.
• In September/October,MIG worked with EMC Research to conduct a statistically valid
phone survey to evaluate citizen needs and perceptions related to recreation.
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
•MIG presented the survey results and preliminary recommendation to the PRAB and to the
Council at the November study session.
• The PRAB met with Council at their November workshop meeting and made a
recommendation for an initial recreation program and further study on a recreation center.
• In early December, MIG met with the recreation project team consisting of staff and leading
citizens to help refine a proposal for the Council, PRAB, and Budget Committee.
• In late December, a preliminary recommendation for an initial recreation program was made,
prior to a full report in January to the Council, PRAB, and Budget Committee.
COUNCIL GOAL 6: Economic Development
Develop and adopt strategic priorities, resources, design program
Data collection and understanding the economic base
MILESTONES:
• Signed MOU with Fields Trust and Trammell Crow regarding the Fields Development
Project
• Completed Public Infrastructure Finance Strategy project for Hunziker Core
• Created Vertical Housing Development Zone
• Created Tigard Enterprise Zone
• Convened Business Roundtable and Brokers Roundtable
• Shared eight graphics that explain the Tigard Economy
COUNCIL GOAL 7: Community Engagement
Redesign community survey effort to include regular two-way communication efforts (based
on Fall 2013 survey results)
Continue 3-4 quarterly open forums to engage residents/neighborhood groups
Community education efforts; develop fiscal report card(Blue Ribbon Task Force
recommendation)
Develop Tigard's community identity
MILESTONES:
• The Mayor and Council held a two series of 3x5x10s to gain feedback from the public. They
were held in May and October with Downtown, Light Rail,Marijuana Legislation/Regulation
and Strategic Planning as some of the topics.
• After connecting with over 1,100 citizens and getting feedback/comments on the city's
proposed long-term vision, the City Council adopted the strategic vision in November.
• The city tried new tools to engage citizens with the vision — a chalkboard wall and an ice
cream truck into the neighborhoods.
COUNCIL GOAL 8: Downtown
Urban renewal ballot measure: Tigard voters clarify authority/projects
Strategy for redevelopment of city-owned property
Resolve composition of CCDA (pros and cons: CCDA, CCAC, Econ Dev Commission to
make it a development agency)
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
Main St./Green St. Construction
Continue Downtown Plaza Site acquisition and design approval(contingent on site
acquisition)
Continue Tigard St. Trail negotiation,design and development
Finalize downtown redevelopment opportunities (if issues can be addressed)
Advance options for rail crossing "trade"for Ash Avenue at-grade crossing
Explore Pacific Highway Urban Renewal District options
MILESTONES:
• Main Street/Green Street completed in November
• Significant progress made on developer agreement for Burnham/Ash redevelopment
• Significant progress made on Main Street property purchase, which will be explored for
potential as public space.
• Second preliminary Tigard Street Trail design session held.
• Staff continued to advise and assist the Tigard Downtown Association as a partner in
downtown revitalization, including working together on parking management.
• Public artwork fabrication nearly complete.
COUNCIL GOAL 9: Growth/Annexation
Successfully complete River Terrace Community Plan
•Reconsider and agree to annexation policy: reauthorize financial incentives as needed;consider
islands and remainder of Bull Mountain;incentives for voluntary annexation;timeline for
Washington County
Develop planning and timeline together with Washington County for future annexations
(Bull Mountain,Metzger)
Update annexation fiscal analysis(from 2004)
Consider annexation of urban reserves for employment land
MILESTONES:
• There was one annexation in 2014 for five acres on Bull Mountain (currently under review).
COUNCIL GOAL 10: Finance
Represent Tigard at the regional, state and federal level to advocate for tax reform and other
funding opportunities
Review city facilities strategy and develop options for repair and replacement("good, better,
best")
Seek voter-approved measure for major investment(capital,parks, etc.)
MILESTONES:
• The city's legislative agenda for State and Federal topics includes tax reform and funding
opportunities.
• Tigard has not sought a voter-approved measure for major investment.
• Prepared for the final financing of the LOTWP and will be issuing approximately $35M of
water revenue bonds in February 2015
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
• Adopted the River Terrace Infrastructure Funding Strategy that provides the toolbox to pay
for major infrastructure improvements in and around River Terrace.
• Started the Infrastructure Financing Project that includes issues like utility surcharges and
system development charge update or creation for parks, streets, sewer, and storm water.
• Convened internal facilities committee which developed an RFP to find a consultant to
conduct a long-term facilities study. A second quarter supplemental budget request will go to
Council at the end of January to fund this study.
GOALS&OBJECTIVES:
2015-2017 Tigard City Council Goals I Priorities for Council Attention and Action
1. Provide Recreation Opportunities for the People of Tigard
Establish city recreation program in 2015-16 adopted budget
• Recreation clearinghouse and program guide
• Grants & scholarships
• Recreation coordinator— staff position
• Programs and classes (beginning Year 2)
• Outdoor events (Year 2)
• Indoor events (Year 3)
Explore feasibility of partnership opportunities, including THPRD, YMCA, other city, or
non-profit opportunities; establish facility partnership if feasible December 2015 --Begin
July 2015 (Year 1)
Consider a voter-approved measure to fund recreation --November 2016
2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be
Support residential and mixed use development in walkable and transit-supported areas by
completing the Ash Ave/Burnham Redevelopment project
• Increase walkable access to open space by advancing plans for new downtown open space,
including the Tigard Street Trail plaza, the Fanno Creek Overlook, and a Main Street
plaza, including programming
• Strengthen downtown's identity by completing gateway improvements and install art at
both Main Street entrances
• Support walkability by completing two Strolling Street projects
• Secure brownfields cleanup grant (if eligible) to facilitate infill or open space development
enabling a more walkable and interconnected downtown
• Promote downtown has a place to shop, dine and recreate through communications and
support of TDA activities. -- Throughout 2015-2017
3. Adopt Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan and Enable Future Development Capacity
Committee recommendation; Council consideration and adoption of Tigard Triangle
Strategic Plan — Spring 2015.
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
Begin project implementation of 1-5 year actions
Regulatory changes
• Amend comprehensive plan, development code, Town Center designation,
Transportation, Parks and Trail Plans, and parking requirements -- Summer 2015
Consider Infrastructure Investment--During 2016
• Red Rock Creek
• Stormwater management plan
• Parks, Plazas and Open Space
Develop Incentives and Public Private Partnerships During 2016
• LID
• Urban Renewal District
• Vertical Housing
• Business or Economic Improvement District
• Grant Programs
• Business/District Association
4. Enable Groundbreaking in River Terrace by Summer 2015
Infrastructure Financing Project (River Terrace and Citywide)
• Council Briefing- February 2015
• SDC Notice and Methodology-- February 2015
• Council Hearing - SDCs --April 2015
River Terrace Community Plan Implementation --January-February 2015
• Zoning Districts
• Code Amendments
Permitting--Possible for final permit approvals by spring 2015
• Early assistance for land use applications
• Building and site permits
Public Facilities
• Clean Water Services - pump station
• City of Tigard 550-Zone Water Improvements
5. Expand Opportunities to Engage People in the Community
• Citywide Communications Plan (will include suggested engagement improvements) --
Spring 2015
• Continue Council 1x10 meetings -- Quarterly throughout each year
• Community education; identify timing and content of measures for voter approval --By
end of 2015; ballot in 2016
Mayor and Council BUDGET UNIT 0500
Organize community engagement through increased work with Neighborhood Networks,
in-person and online forums
WORKLOAD MEASURES
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Number of regional committees 8 9 9 9
requiring elected official attendance
Number of City Council meetings 38 38 38 38
Average length (hours) of council 3 3 3 3
meetings
Number of Resolutions adopted 78 78 78 78
Number of Ordinances adopted 20 20 20 20
Population served 48,415 48,695 49,135 55444
Number of opportunities for residents to NA NA 16 30
interact with elected officials (12 Fireside
Chats, 16 1x10 events, 2 Town Halls)
EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Average rating on citizens' highest 8 8.5 8.5 8.5
service priorities
Citizens rating overall city services as 85% 85% 85% 85%
good or better
Citizens who feel that Tigard will be a 85% 85% 85% 85%
better place to live and work in the future
Citizens rating overall city services as 85% 87% 87% 87%
good or better
Citizens who say the city's long-term 0 49%" 0 59%
strategic vision represents their long-term
vision (as measured in biennial survey)
*average of phone &web responses
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
AIS-2094 5.
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 01/20/2015
Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes
Agenda Title: Discussion on Pacific Highway
Prepared For: Liz Newton, City Management Submitted By: Norma
Alley, City
Management
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
At the City Council's December 22, 2014, Goal Setting Meeting, the council requested an
opportunity for discussion on matters pertaining to Pacific Highway congestion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff will make brief presentations on citizen input on the issue, traffic engineering
considerations and traffic enforcement efforts. After council discussion, reach consensus on
any policy review and/or community outreach and education needed.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
In several citizen surveys conducted over the last 2 decades, respondents have identified
traffic and transportation concerns, particularly along Pacific Highway, as the major issue
facing the city.
The 2013 Community Attitudes survey results were similiar to previous surveys. Congestion
was identified as the single most important issue facing the city. As a follow-up to the survey,
a focus group on traffic congestion was held in January 2014. Participants expressed concerns
about the impact traffic congestion on commuter routes has on neighborhood streets.The
Executive Summary of the survey results and a summary of the focus group findings are both
attached.
In response to citizens concerns about traffic congestion over the past two decades, the city
has been working with ODOT and Washington County to address congestion. Significant
investments to the local street system have been made to keep traffic moving though Tigard.
A sheet summarizing the actions taken is attached.
When considering projects and investments designed to alleviate congestion on 99W
transportation engineering staff looks at traffic volumes and patterns, safety including accident
frequency, cost and the impact the proposed improvement would have on improving
congestion and traffic flow. Traffic enforcement priorities on 99W are guided by traffic
accident data.
The 2012 Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force report noted that the appearance of the
community is important and that beautification of Pacific Highway could improve the overall
image of the city. The Task Force recommended a renewed focus on community aesthetics
and beautification. The recommendation called for a review, update and enforcement of code
requrements as necessary in keepig with community standards as determined through the
community survey. (Relevant page attached.) There were no questions to gauge interest in a
focus on community aesthetics in the 2013 Community Attitudes survey.
Pacific Hwy. is a state highway and ODOT has been clear that the city will be responsible for
maintenance of any landscape/beautification allowed within the right-of-way, such as
landscaped medians.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
City Council's December 22, 2014, Goal Setting Meeting.
Attachments
2013 Community Survey Executive Summary
Traffic Congestion Focus Group Report
Pacific Hwy. Information Sheet
Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force report recommendation
CM •research marketing public relations •public affairs •federal lobbying •state lobbying
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
December 23, 2013
To: Marty Wine, Liz Newton and Kent Wyatt
From: Tom Eiland, CFM Strategic Communications
Subject: Executive Summary for the 2013 Community Attitudes Survey
Overview
This memo is the executive summary for results from the 2013 City of Tigard
Community Attitudes Survey. The research was conducted in two parts:
• A telephone among a random sample of 300 city residents age 18 years
and older. Interviews were conducted in November 2013. The margin of
error is 5.8 percent at the 95 percent confidence level.
• An online survey among 606 city residents conducted in December 2013.
The online survey used the same questionnaire as the phone survey, with
minor edits to account for the web-based format. The online survey
technique was used as a research and engagement tool to permit more
residents to participate in the process. Just 21 people participated in both
surveys, resulting in feedback from an additional 585 residents in the
online survey.
In total, 885 residents shared opinions using this multi-modal research
methodology.
Key Findings
• Opinions about Tigard as a place to live have improved. Using a 10-point
scale, the city received a mean rating of 7.9 as a place to live, up from 7.6
found in the 2011 survey.
— Ratings in 2013 are consistent throughout all demographic groups.
• Congestion remains number one top of mind issue.
• A large share of the community think the city should increase support for
some programs. Among the ten changes to programs tested, the most
important include economic development, street maintenance, police
sponsored youth programs, maintenance of new parks and improved
communication with citizens.
• Opinions how to reduce congestion along 99W vary.
1
cfm ►research marketing public relations •public affairs ►federal lobbying •state lobbying
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
— A majority thinks high capacity transit options would reduce congestion
but connecting and expanding walk ways and bikes paths would not.
— A large share volunteer adding road capacity is an option that would
reduce congestion.
• A majority opposes expanding hours of the library and public counters if the
additional services would cost more money.
• Residents overwhelmingly oppose building a new $34 million police station.
• A majority thinks the principles of draft strategic plan are headed in the right
direction.
• People are get information from a variety of sources. City managed sources
are used by a majority of residents.
— Changing the CityScape to a digital format is supported widely.
Topline Results
General Perspectives
Overall, how do you rate
Tigard as a place to live?
Residents are impressed with Tigard as a place to live. Please use a 0 to 10 scale,
Mean ratings in 2013 (7.9 on a ten point scale) are at with zero meaning very
the highest level in six years. Ratings are consistent in poor place to live, and 10
an excellent place to live.
all demographic groups. Ratings in the phone (7.9) and 2013 7.9
web (7.7 surveys are similar. 2011 7.6
2009 7.8
2007 7.4
Residents volunteer congestion (29%) as the single
most important issue facing the City of Tigard. No other issue is mentioned by
more than 5% in the phone survey. Congestion is also selected as the most
important problem in the web survey. More than one in ten select street
improvement (13%) and public transportation (10%) as most important.
Responses were volunteered in the phone survey, while responses were
provided in a list in the online questionnaire and respondents were allowed to
choose multiple responses. As a result, totals for specific issues may vary.
What, in your opinion,is the single most important issue for
the city council to address over the next year?(Top Six)
Phone Web
Congestion 29% 41%
Street improvements/maintenance 5% 13%
Transportation/public transit 5% 10%
Downtown development 5% 7%
Growth and development/growth planning 5% 5%
Education/schools 5% 1%
2
C ►research marketing public relations •public affairs •federal lobbying •state lobbying
--tom— —�— "--- ---- ---- ----
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
People were asked to rate the importance of ten potential changes to city
programs and services, recognizing that the change would have budget
implications. The five changes rated most important were identical in the phone
and web surveys including: increasing economic development, increasing street
maintenance, developing and maintaining newly purchased parks, improving the
city's communication with citizens and expanding policy youth service programs.
A majority rated developing recreation programs, expanding hours of the city
library and increasing code enforcement as very or somewhat important.
Resuming rental of city meeting rooms and expanding the hours of city hall is
open were less important.
The importance of each change was similar among all demographic groups,
except people age 18 to 44 rated recreation programs and communication more
important that other groups.
For each of the following, tell me if the change is very important, somewhat important, not too
important or not at all important to you personally.
Very/somewhat
important
Phone Web
Increase efforts to retain existing and attract new jobs to the city. 87% 82%
Increase the level of street maintenance. 83% 80%
Development and maintenance of newly purchased parks. 74% 76%
Improve the city's communication with citizens. 72% 68%
Expand police youth service programs. 71% 58%
Develop city-sponsored recreation programs. 59% 53%
Expand open hours for the city public library. 58% 52%
Increase funding for city neighborhood code enforcement, such as 57% 53%
tall grass, signs on sidewalks and late-night noise.
Resume rental of city meeting rooms. 39% 36%
Expand hours city hall is open. 27% 17%
Facilities
Residents opposed reopening the Tigard City Library on Thursday at a cost of
$460,000 a year, 23% favor to 74% opposed. At least two thirds of all groups
opposed the change.
When given a choice about changing the hours of the City's public counters,
residents were more likely to prefer no change (51%) while four in ten wanted to
extend hours one night a week at an additional cost of $28,000 (41%), but few
wanted to open the public counters Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm at a cost of
3
C ►research marketing public relations 10 public affairs ■federal lobbying ►state lobbying
®
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
$113,000 a year (5%). Women (53%) were the only group that wanted to extend
public counter hours one night a week.
Residents opposed a potential $34 million bond measure to build a new policy
station, 30% favor to 63% opposed. This trial balloon proposal indicates the city
needs to build a case why a new police station is needed and how a new station
will benefit the community before proposing a bond measure for approval.
Congestion
Residents were asked a series of four questions about traffic congestion to
provide decision makers some planning guidelines to address transportation
problems on Pacific Highway/99W.
When city residents were asked to what extent they thought three options to
address congestion on Pacific Highway/99W would reduce traffic congestion, a
majority in both the phone and web surveys thought two options would be
effective:
• High-capacity transit options, including express bus service and rapid
transit connecting to Portland and other parts of Washington County
(Phone: 59% would reduce congestion, 30% not would reduce congestion;
Online: 70% would reduce congestion, 23% would not reduce congestion)
and
• Build light rail/MAX lines connecting to Portland and existing light rail/MAX
service in Washington County (Phone: 53% would reduce congestion,
38% would not reduce congestion; Online: 65% would reduce congestion,
29% would not reduce congestion).
By a two to one margin, phone survey participants thought the options to expand
and connect walkways and bike paths within the City of Tigard would not reduce
congestion but web participants were evenly divided. (Phone: 32% would reduce
congestion, 61% would not reduce congestion; Web 47% would reduce
congestion, 47% would not reduce congestion).
When asked for other suggestions, comments about increasing road capacity
and synchronizing traffic lights were most frequently volunteered as ways to
reduce congestion on Pacific Highway.
Strategic Plan
After residents learned the city was developing a strategic plan, and heard or
read that the cornerstone of the plan was making Tigard: The most walkable
4
cfm ►research marketing public relations Or public affairs ►federal lobbying te state lobbying
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.corn 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities
enjoy healthy and interconnected lives, 52% of phone and 46% of web
participants said the statement represented their own long-term vision for the
city. On the other hand, 42% of phone and 41% of web participants said the
statement did not represent their vision for the city. As a rule residents age 18 to
54 years were more likely to say the cornerstone statement represented their
vision for the city.
Additionally, residents were asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with
four goals on which the City of Tigard will base future priorities and direction. At
least seven in ten in both phone and web surveys agreed overwhelmingly with all
four goals.
As part of the strategic plan,four goals have been developed as the
foundation on which the City of Tigard will base priorities and
direction for the next 20 years. Tell me if you agree or disagree with
each goal?
Total Total Not
agree disagree sure
Fund the overall vision while
maintaining core services with Phone 80% 12% 8%
responsible financial
management, adjusting
priorities. Web 84% 12% 4%
Engage the community
through two-way Phone 79% 15% 6%
communication, promoting
vibrant business districts,
livable neighborhood and Web 87% 10% 3%
places for meeting.
Ensure commercial, residential
and parks development Phone 72% 24% 4%
advances the overall vision of
Tigard as a walkable
community. Web 75% 20% 4%
Facilitate walking connections
Phone 70% 27% 2%
with parks,trails,and bike
paths to develop a unique
Tigard identity. Web 75% 22% 3%
5
cfm ►research marketing public relations to public affairs ►federal lobbying R.state lobbying
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 wwr.cfm-onl ine.comI11005W Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
Communications
Cityscape is the top sources for During the past year,what have been your
news and information about the City main sources of information specifically
of Tigard. Other key sources include about the City of Tigard? (Top Six)
the Times, The Oregonian, local TV Phone Web
news, word of mouth and the City of Cityscape,the City 50% 77%
Tigard website. The top six sources newsletter
for news were the same in both the The Times 21°/a 34%
The Oregonian 17% 27%
phone and web surveys. Responses Local television news 10% 14%
in phone survey were volunteered, Word of mouth 10% 22%
while a list of responses was Cit of Ti i and Website 7% 30%
provided in the online questionnaire
and respondents were allowed to
choose multiple responses. As a result, totals for specific issues may vary.
When residents were
asked from which of All things considered, how would you like to get
sources they would like information about activities in the City of Tigard?
to get information, Phone Web CityScape mailed to your home(t) 46% 51%
Cityscape mailed to An e-newsletter sent by the city(d) 26% 57%
home (46%) was the An e-newsletter on the city's website(d) 21% 22%
preferred in the phone The newspaper(t) 18% 24%
survey while web The city's website(d) 16% 39%
participants were evenly Facebook(d) 7% 19%
divided between an e- Twitter(d) 3% 5%
newsletter from the city DON'T READ Not sure 5% 3%
(57%) and CityScape Total traditional (t) 58% 62%
mailed to home (51%). Total digital(d) 51% 86%
Other options were also
popular. As a rule, residents under age 55 year preferred to get news from digital
sources while those age 55 and older prefer traditional sources. Results from
both surveys indicate that people want to get news from a variety of information
sources and that no one source can be used to keep residents informed about
local issues.
6
CM ►research marketing public relations ►public affairs ►federal lobbying ►state lobbying
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
By more than a three to
one margin, residents Which of the following would you prefer for CityScape?
preferred to change the Phone Web
Change CityScape to a digital
CityScape to a digital format,with some printed copies °
format with some printed available but not mailed, at a cost of 74/° 77/o
copies available but not approximately$2,000 a year.
mailed, at a cost of$2,000 Continue to print and mail
rather than continuing to
CityScape to all city residents and 21% 14%
print and mail the businesses at a cost of$80,000 a
year.
publication to all city Other 2% 6%
residents and businesses Not sure 3% 2
at a cost of$80,000 a
year. Opinions about
changing CityScape were almost identical in both the phone and web surveys.
7
II•
TIGARD
0
Traffic Congestion :
A focus group among
Tigard residents
January 2014
Ill ►research 4 marketing public relations •public affairs •federal lobbying •state'obbying
svat,•qp:r,xnmunications,Inc. 503-294 9120 www.cfrn online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Poniard,Oregon 97204
Methodology
This report summarizes the results of a focus group conducted among residents
of the City of Tigard.
The session was conduct January 22, 2014 in the conference room in City of
Tigard Public Works building. A total of 10 residents participated including:
• Six women and four men participated.
• Six were recruited from participants in December 2013 online survey and
four by phone.
• All are very or somewhat concerned about traffic congestion in Tigard.
Tom Eiland, Vice President, CFM Strategic Communications, Inc. moderated the
session. CFM provided all participants a $25 honorarium to compensate each for
their time and travel expenses.
Objectives
Objectives for the project were:
• Identify specific concerns about traffic congestion in Tigard.
• Assess opinions about the effectiveness of high capacity transit,
increasing road capacity and expanding walkways and bike paths as ways
to address traffic congestion.
• Identify expectations for traffic once projects to address the issue are
completed.
• Assess opinions about Tigard's involvement in regional decision-making
about traffic planning.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 2
cf m ►research market ng public relations ►public affairs ►federal lobbying le state,obbywhai
— —
sh:teqc c.x-•rumra-icc:,mc. 503.294.9120 www.dm online.rr.•o t 100 SW Seth Avenrc,Suite 1475 Portland,Oregon 97704
RESEARCH RESULTS
Specific Concerns about Traffic Congestion
Residents are most concerned about traffic in their neighborhoods and
bottlenecks at intersections from neighborhoods to major commuting routes.
People talked about issues in neighborhoods or bottlenecks on routes used for
commuting.
• Problem streets included Walnut, Bonita, Durham, McDonald, Hall and
Bull Mountain.
• Traffic problems people are concerned about include:
o Turnouts from neighborhoods
o Commuters using residential streets
o Speeding in neighborhoods
o Pedestrians crosswalk
o Nightmare commutes within the city.
Cause for Congestion
Residents cited numerous factors contributing to traffic congestion including:
• Residential growth without a corresponding increase in road capacity
• Poor planning
• High-density housing developments due to land-use regulations
• Commuters from other cities passing through Tigard
• Poorly timed traffic lights on 99W
• Congestion on 99W forcing commuters to seek alternative routes.
Focus group participants blamed others for traffic congestion within the city. No
one admits that their own driving habits or those of their neighbors contribute to
congestion.
• Some admitted to making six trips a day within Tigard, such as commuting
to work, taking children to different daycare locations or just routine daily
shopping.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 3
Cm ►research market ng public relations ►public affairs •federal lobbying •state obbymg
emet me vex,lam nee 1011 IN= MINI NOM 1• .s.:.. titil!IM INNUI - ME MINO -,.r:: OMNI
strategic rommunicatinns,me 503.294 9120 w.vw.cfrmonliro.com 1100 SW S-.xth Avenee,Suite.1425 I Poniard,Oregon 97204
Addressing the Traffic Congestion Problem
Focus group participants were asked to evaluate three options that are being
considered to reduce traffic congestion in the City of Tigard:
• High capacity transit
• Increase road capacity
• Expand and connect walkways and bike paths
High Capacity Transit
People support more transit but are skeptical it will reduce traffic congestion.
• Participants say they can't or won't use bus or rail for commuting.
• Bus stops are not conveniently located.
• Rail options don't connect with preferred destinations.
• Travel time would be too long via transit.
Participants added:
• The "car-dependent culture" will be hard to break.
• Buses would compound congestion by blocking roads to pick up and drop
off passengers.
• People getting to transit hubs would create more congestion problems.
The discussion's bottom line was participants say public transportation
connecting Tigard with other parts of the metropolitan area would make the city
more livable but will not solve congestion issues.
One unexpected turn in the session was people say they wanted more intra-city
transit options. People say the service will:
• Help transport people to bus stops, WES and retail.
• Provide services to and from neighborhoods.
• Reduce some intra-city car use.
The group is frustrated that current Tri-Met bus stops in Tigard are infrequent,
inconvenient or inaccessible.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 4
cfm ►research marketing public relations •public affairs •federal lobbying •state obbying
:L atoqr.c mvr unirnticns,mc. 503.294 9120 AVM.cfm-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenee,Srite 1475 Portland,Oregon 97704
Increase Road Capacity
Focus group participants generally agreed increasing road capacity is not a
viable option to reduce congestion. People explained:
• There is no room available to build or expand roads.
• Businesses and homes would be displaced if lanes are added to existing
roads or new roads are built.
• Eminent domain is unfair.
• Adding lanes to 99W is appealing but is rife with problems.
People are also concerned that increasing capacity would undermine the
community's livability.
Expand and Connect Walkways and Bike Paths
Overall, participants agreed walkways and bike paths make the city more livable
but would have no impact on traffic congestion.
Participants say walkways and bike paths connect people to parks and recreation
but few would actually commute to work or shop by walking or riding a bike.
People explained:
• Hills through the city and long distances to retail, downtown Portland and
other work-hubs inhibit bike use.
• The Tigard area is significantly different than East Portland where there
are few hills and the roads are straight.
• Older residents won't walk or use bikes due to geographic and physical
challenges.
Other Options
When asked what other projects or changes may offer relief to traffic congestion
individual participants suggested:
• Improve major intersections to relieve bottlenecks.
• Coordinate traffic lights on 99W to allow travel through the city faster.
• Build a bypass around Tigard.
• Build overpasses for cross-streets on 99W.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 5
Cm ►research marketing public relations ►p„oi c affairs ►federal lobbyirg 11.state'obbymg,
Ittttti ———lttttti —tttttttti—— ——tttttttti— ———tttttttti - —Itttttttti tttiti— tart+•
strategic communications,inc. 503.294.9120 www.dr,-online.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1475 Poniard,Oregon 97204
Expectations
People expect significant improvements once projects to address traffic
congestion are completed. People expect:
• Traffic will flow at the speed limit throughout the day.
• Congestion on secondary and residential streets will be reduced or
eliminated.
• More mass transit options within Tigard will be available during all hours.
Coordinating Efforts
Participants agreed Tigard and the region need to work together to address
transportation issues. People say cities should work with Metro to address
common problems such as:
• Connectivity
• Cost sharing
• Communication
SW Corridor Project
When asked to explain the SW Corridor Project only two people had heard of it.
One of the two described the project as "the bypass that parallels 217" and the
other wasn't sure but generally agreed with the bypass description.
Key Findings
• Overall, people are skeptical that any of the three options tested, HCT, roads
and walkways/bike paths, would reduce congestion in the City of Tigard.
HCT may have a positive impact on the city, but its impact on traffic
congestion is expected to be limited.
• Introducing intra-city transit may help.
Mini-buses and vans should run through neighborhoods connecting residents
to transportation hubs and retail.
The service would need to be convenient to succeed.
• The City of Tigard should be involved in decision-making with other
government entities to improve connectivity, planning and cost sharing.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 6
Cn ►research • marketing public relations ►public affairs ■federal lobbying ►state iobbymg
MON %van,VIM MOO ti WW1,M OM NM lin- ,... -M .`„ I i MIN.x:.,a■
strrtegtr cornmunic.ricns,rnc. S 29 9120 www.dm onlire.com 1100 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1425 Portland,Oregon 97204
• People expect traffic flow to improve significantly once projects to address
congestion are completed.
Expectations are probably unachievable.
• Residents don't have a concept about how long it will take to complete
projects to address congestion.
• Residents are not aware of actions that have been taken to address
congestion.
• Tigard residents should be provided a vision about what can be done to
reduce traffic congestion and how changes will affect people personally. This
communication should include:
Short-term and long-term goals and efforts.
An explanation about what has been done.
A timeline for completion.
Creating realistic expectations for success.
City of Tigard Focus Group: Congestion 7
ea �, 7 , Pacific Highway
. .
a
Tigard Mt Traffic Congestion:
99W
h:u,a%Y
° T I G A R D ' S R E S P O N S E
Lake Forest
LIor two decades Tigard residents have been telling us the same thing:Traffic congestion in
Tigard,particularly along Pacific Highway(99W),is their most pressing concern.
• Pacific Highway is the And we've been listening.
busiest five-lane arterial s
state highway in Oregon, Pacific Highway(99W)is a state highway and the Oregon
and Tigard bears its Department of Transportation(ODOT)is responsible for its
highest level of traffic maintenance and improvements.Although traffic volumes on
volume with an average of Pacific Highway have held from 46,000-50,000 vehicles per
50,000 vehicles per day. day over the last 20 years,it's estimated that the new River
Terrace neighborhood will add up to 9,000 vehicles each day -'
to this busy arterial.
•
By 2030, the Portland
Central Business District is THE SEARCH FOR SOLUTIONS
projected to provide over Partnering with ODOT and Washington County,Tigard has attempted to solve the problem.
200,000 jobs. Significant investments to the local street system have been made over the last two decades to keep
traffic moving through Tigard and ease congestion at major intersection points including:
• By 2035, it is predicted
• Improvements at Pacific Highway's intersections with 69th Avenue,McDonald Street,
that travel demand along
the 99W corridor will in- Hall Boulevard,Greenburg Road/Main Street and Bull Mountain Road.
crease by 25-50 percent.
• Improvements to Gaarde Street from Pacific Highway to Walnut Street.
• Widening Durham Road from Boones Ferry to Pacific Highway.
• The Southwest Corridor is • Improvements to traffic circulation on Pacific Highway north of Highway 217 as part of a
the last quadrant of the Walmart development.
Portland Metropolitan Additional plans are underway for improvements to Main Street and the Pacific Highway/
Region completely McDonald/Gaarde Street intersection.
unserved by frequent-
service high-capacity A COMMITMENT TO THE FUTURE
transit. In July 2011 the Tigard City Council and ODOT agreed to principles of collaboration to continue to
develop efficient and economically viable solutions to:
• In order to accomodate • Recognize Pacific Highway's function as a principal arterial but ensure that the community's
current and future traffic, needs are met.
Pacific Highway would • Develop high-capacity transit and complimentary bicycle,pedestrian and greenway amenities
need to be widened to six to serve Tigard and the surrounding communities.
or eight lanes at a cost of • Acquire funding from multiple sources to address the significant transportation needs in the
approximately$400 Tigard area.
million. This would also • Invest in capital improvements and traffic management measures to reduce congestion and
have a significant impact improve safety.
on over 100 businesses • Develop accessible,economically viable transportation and land use patterns within
and 50 structures. the corridor.
CITIZEN SURVEY DATA
1993 27%of survey respondents identified traffic/transportation concerns as the biggest
II
threats to quality of life.
�,. 2000 Nearly two-thirds of respondents indicated they would use the proposed commuter
rail(WES)system.
TIGARD 37%of respondents said that"roads,traffic and transportation"are the most important
2005 issues facing Tigard. p p
City of Tigard 2006 45%of respondents mentioned traffic as the thing they least liked about living
in Tigard.
13125 SW Hall Blvd..Tigard,OR 97223 2011 Three out of five residents surveyed responded favorably to the idea of light rail in Tigard.
ww .tigard-or.gov 2013 The community survey of nearly 900 residents identified traffic congestion as the
single most important issue facing the City of Tigard.
Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force I Final Report
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic development and a healthy business sector are critical for a financially stable and vibrant
community.A more robust local economy brings more revenue to the city which supports the city's
goal of financial stability.The city has a lot to offer businesses but needs to be more creative and
proactive in attracting quality businesses that citizens want, especially downtown. Engage citizens to
identify the types of businesses that will keep them here and encourage them to shop local. Use
marketing tools to increase private rather than public investment.The city's low tax rate should be
attractive to investors.
Which investments in the business community would get them involved and connected in determining
what's important for businesses to be successful—tax incentives, infrastructure improvements,
business-friendly policies?Positive interactions between the business community and city personnel
are critical.The city should work to identify business types and/or clusters to attract new businesses
and develop the business community. It's important to get input from the business community about
Tigard's unique potential that makes it attractive for investment. It's also important to connect with
successful business owners in areas with more potential such as Washington Square II.
The appearance of the community is important.The beautification of Pacific Highway could improve
the overall image of the city.The view of downtown from the Pacific Highway viaduct could also be
improved, making downtown more inviting.
Although viewed as an important commitment by the city to advancing improvements in the
downtown, the Burnham Street project has not had a positive impact on downtown development by
itself; it is the first phase. More public or public/private investments are needed in the downtown to
spur private investment.
• RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Develop and implement a competitive economic development strategy that creatively
engages members of the business community and the citizens. Focus on strategies for the
downtown, Washington Square II,the Pacific Highway corridor and the Tigard Triangle.
Include ideas for leveraging private investment through interviews with successful
developers with proven equity investors such as Barry Cain of Gramor, who developed
both Progress Ridge and downtown Lake Oswego. Emphasize doing business locally.
Enhance this strategy through a dedicated full time staff position and an economic
development commission.
2. Renew a focus on community aesthetics and beautification. Review, update and enforce
code requirements as necessary in keeping with community standards as determined
through the community survey.
4of8