Report City of Tigard `DECEIVED
q Building Division
• 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 OCT 2 7 Z014
Phone: 503.718.2439 Fax: 503.598.1960
T I GARD Inspection Line: 503.639.4175 CITY OFTIGAHI)
www.tigard-or.gov BUILDING DIVISION
2010 Oregon Solar Installation Specialty Code
Check List for Prescriptive Installation of Roof-Mounted
PhotoVoltaic Solar Panel System
/V151201,-1- 80)c b
Property Information
Installation Address: 7'. 15 $. J (e& .r(-as+ S+ .
City: J i c�,r� Zip: cf o a�
Owner's Name: AA0,Acte1 ,01hS Date: Of 77 f IL\
Contractor's Name: 3ek L./Z CCB #: 2_6)i\2_
Design Parameters of the Property/Structure
If"Yes", does not
Flood Hazard Is the installation ❑ Yes qualify for the
Area Located in a flood prescriptive path, follow
plain/flood way? Ks No OSSC or ORSC for
design requirements.
Wind Exposure Is the wind exposure �' Yes If"Yes", qualifies for
"C" or less? ❑ No the prescriptive path.
Installations on detached Is the Ground Snow
single/two-family Load 70 psf or less?
dwelling/single/two- If"Yes", qualifies for
family townhomes Yes the prescriptive path.
and/or their accessory
Ground structures. ❑ No
Snow Load Is the Ground Snow
• Installations on all Load 50 psf or less?
structures other than If"Yes", qualifies for
❑ Yes the prescriptive path.
above
❑ No
1
I:/Building/Forms/PhotoVoltaic-Checklist.docx
Is the construction
IN
material wood and does Yes
Type of If"Yes", qualifies for
the construction qualify ❑ No
Construction the prescriptive path.
as "conventional light
frame"construction?
Is the spacing 24 inches
or less?
If"Yes", qualifies for
Pre-engineered trusses. Yes the prescriptive path.
❑ No
Roof framing
members Is the spacing 24 inches
or less?
Nominal lumber. ❑ If"Yes", qualifies for
Yes the prescriptive path.
❑ No
Is the combined weight S Yes
of the PV modules and If"Yes", qualifies for
racking less than or ❑ No the prescriptive path.
Solar equal to 4.5 psf?
installation Is the solar installation
layout in accordance Yes
If"Yes", qualifies for
with Section 305.4(3)of ❑ No the prescriptive path.
the 2010 Oregon Solar
Code?
❑ Metal
Single layer If roofing material is
Roofing Check the type of ❑ of wood one of the three types
material roofing material shingle/shake checked, qualifies for
Max. two layers the prescriptive path.
"i of composition
shingle.
Is the roof mounted S. Yes
Connections of solar assembly
If"Yes", qualifies for
the solar assembly connected to roof ❑ No the prescriptive path.
to the roof framing or blocking
directly?
2
I:Building/Forms/Photo Voltaic-Checkl ist.docx
•
Is the gauge 26 or less? n Yes If"Yes", qualifies for •
❑ No the prescriptive path.
115 lbs for 60 inch
spacing or less?
If"Yes", qualifies for
❑ Yes the prescriptive path.
No
inimum Uplift rating
of Clamps? 75 lbs for 48 inches
spacing or less?
f"Yes", qualifies for
I I Yes the prescriptive path.
No
Attachment of
roof mounted Minim 4 inches If the spacing falls
solar systems Spacing of clamps? within 24 inches and 60
directly to inches M. mum 60 inches inches, qualifies for the
standing seam
prescriptive path.
metal panels Width of roofing If the width of the panel
is less than 18 inches,
panels? 18 in •es or less qualifies for the
inches prescriptive path.
Minimum#10 at •4
inches o/c?
Siz= and spacing of If"Yes", qualifies for
fastener? El Yes - prescriptive path.
❑ No
Is the roof decking of
WSP min. 'h"thickness, ❑ Yes
decking connected to If"Yes", qualifies for
framing members ❑ No the prescriptive path.
w/min. 8d nails @
6"/12"o/c?
Is the height less than or
Maximum 18 inches equal to 18 inches?
Height of the from the top of the If"Yes", qualifies for
solar modules module to the roof . Yes the prescriptive path.
surface. ❑ No
3
I:Building/Forms/PhotoVoltaio.Checkl ist.docx
•
Submittal Documents required for Prescriptive Installations
Show the location of the PV system in relation to buildings, structures,
property lines, and, as applicable, flood hazard areas.
Site Plan Details must be clear and easy to read.
Minimum size of the plan is 8.5 x 11 inches.
Attach a simple structural plan showing the roof framing (rafter size, type, and
spacing) and PV module system racking attachment.
System must be shown in sufficient detail and clarity to assess whether it
Structural Plan meets the prescriptive construction requirements as listed earlier above in the
matrix.
Minimum size of the plan is 8.5 x 11 inches.
PV Modules
Manufacturer: 5u h
Model Number:
Listing Agency: TU v It&GS/ � � -v K.F.1.J1o, GS t- (E F5 5
4
I:Bui lding/Forms/Photo V oltaic-Checkl ist.docx
SUN POWER
E-SERIES SOLAR PANELS
i't' t t'd h +rasa Itt-
-� ;� , _ HIGH PERFORMANCE & EXCELLENT DURABILITY
p 9,
-_ N' - �_ I
I * - ' ''- '` ,, RECEIVED
• 20.4%efficiency
Ideal for roofs where space is at a premium OCT 2.1 704
or where future expansion might be •
needed. CITY OFTIGARD
• High performance E20-327 PANEL. BUILDING INVISION
Delivers excellent performance in real world
conditions, such as high temperatures, HIGH EFFICIENCY°
clouds and low light.''2,3
Generate more energy per square meter
• Proven value
Designed for residential rooftops, E Series E-Series residential panels convert more sunlight to electricity
panels deliver the features, value and producing 36%more power per panel, and 60% more energy per
performance for any home. square meter over 25 years-
3
_ HIGH ENERGY PRODUCTION'
• — _ — Produce more energy per rated watt
... High year one performance delivers 7-9% more energy per rated
—
watt.' This advantage increases over time, producing 20% more
ii energy over the first 25 years to meet your needs.°
Maxeon"Solar Cells:Fundamentally better.
Engineered for performance,designed for durability.
t 120%
Engineered for peace of mind 110% .
Designed to deliver consistent, trouble-free ,
o 1
energy over a very long lifetime.4•5 ti 100%
p
• 90%% 35%more,
Designed for durability
a year 25
The SunPower Maxeon Solar Cell is the >. 80%
only cell built on a solid copper foundation. W 70% Conventional
Virtually impervious to the corrosion and d 60%
cracking that degrade Conventional N 50% aiiiiikarthiiiiiiiii4,
Panels.4•5 10 15 20 25
• Years
#1 Ranked in Fraunhofer durability test.10 0 10% aGr
100%power maintained in Atlas 25+ g Maintains High aytE� PER
Power at High Temps F
comprehensive PVDI Durability test-" 8% r
W 4
m �'r x s No Li hNnduced PHOTON
• 6% Degradation poi?F Ei`\E4
Q High Average Watts
rn 4% _ _ _i Better Low•Light and
P Spectral Response
W 2.
i High-Performance
Anti-Reflective Gloss
> 0%
sunpowercorp.com
SUN POWER
E-SERIES SOLAR PANELS
SUNPOWER OFFERS THE BEST COMBINED POWER AND PRODUCT WARRANTY
POWER WARRANTY PRODUCT WARRANTY
YU
85'
yes,
More guaranteed power:95%for first 5 years, Combined Power and Product defect 25 year coverage
-0.4%/yr.to year 25.8 that includes panel replacement costs.9
ELECTRICAL DATA OPERATING CONDITION AND MECHANICAL DATA
E20-327 E19-320 Temperature —40°C to+85°C
Nominal Power12(Pnom) 327 W 320 W Wind: 2400 Pa, 245 kg/m2 front&back
Power Tolerance +5/-0% +5/-0% Max load Snow:5400 Pa,550 kg/m2 front
Avg. Panel Efficiency13 20.4% 19.8% Impact resistance 25mm diameter hail at 23 m/s
Rated Voltage(Vmpp) 54.7 V 54.7 V Appearance Class A
Rated Current(Impp) 5.98 A 5.86 A Solar Cells 96 Monocrystalline Maxeon Gen II
Open-Circuit Voltage(Voc) 64.9 V 64.8 V Tempered Glass High transmission tempered Anti-Reflective
Short-Circuit Current(lsc) 6.46 A 6.24 A Junction Box IP-65 Rated
Max.System Voltage 1000 V IEC&600 V UL Connectors MC4
Maximum Series Fuse 20 A Frame Class 1 black anodized(highest AAMA rating)
Power Temp Coef. —0.38%/°C Weight 18,6 kg
Voltage Temp Coef. —176.6 mV/°C
Current Temp Coef. 3.5 mA/°C TESTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Standard tests IEC 61215,IEC 61730,U1.1703
REFERENCES: Quality tests ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004
1 All comparisons are SPR-E20-327 vs.a representative conventional
panel:240W,approx. 1.6 m2, 15%efficiency. EHS Compliance RoHS,OHSAS 18001:2007,lead free,
2 PVEvolution Labs"SunPower Shading Study,"Feb 2013. PV Cycle
3 Typically 7-9%more energy per watt,BEW/DNV Engineering"SunPower Ammonia test IEC 62716
Yield Report,"Jan 2013. -
4 SunPower 0.25%/yr degradation vs. 1.0%/yr cony.panel.Campeau,Z. Salt Spray test IEC 61701 (passed maximum severity)
et ol."SunPower Module Degradation Rate,"SunPower white paper,Feb PID test Potential-Induced Degradation free: 1000V10
2013;Jordan,Dirk"SunPower Test Report,"NREL,Oct 2012. Available listings TUV,MCS, UL,JET, KEMCO,CSA,CEC, FSEC
5"SunPower Module 40-Year Useful Life"SunPower white paper,Feb
2013.Useful life is 99 out of 100 panels operating at more than 70%of
rated power.
6 Out of all 2600 panels listed in Photon International,Feb 2012. ,...1
7 8%mare energy than the average of the top 10 panel companies tested .■.
in 2012(151 panels, 102 companies),Photon International,March 2013. ;■■�
8 Compared with the top 15 manufacturers.SunPower Warranty Review, r 1110 "�
Feb 2013. •..
9 Some exclusions apply.See warranty for details. 11,11
10 5 of top 8 panel manufacturers were tested by Fraunhofer ISE,"PV ■� t
Module Durability Initiative Public Report,"Feb 2013.
11 Compared with the non-stress-tested control panel.Atlas 25+Durability 46 mm
test report,Feb 2013. 1559 mm
12 Standard Test Conditions(1000 W/m2 irradiance,AM 1.5,25°C).
13 Based on average of measured power values during production
See http://www.sunpowercorp.com/facts for more reference information.
For more details,see extended datasheet:www.sunpowercorp.com/datasheets.Read safety and installation instructions before using this product
,clMoy 2013 SunPower Corporation.All rights reserved.SUNPOWER,the SUNPOWER logo,MAXEON,MORE ENERGY.FOR LIFE.,and SIGNATURE ore trademarks«registered
trademarks of SunPower Corporation_Specifications included in this dotasheet are sub1ed to rhonge without notice.
sunpowercorp.com
Documsm N 505813 Rev A/AI UK AUS