Loading...
Hearings Officer Packet - 10/26/2009 - T, q City of Tigard Hearings Officer — Agenda MEETING DATE: October 26,2009, 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard— Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 STAFF REPORTS: Available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext.2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD- Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services,please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m.no less than one (1)week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH GRANT STREET PARKING T EXPANSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2009-00002 REQUEST: The applicant proposes a Major Modification (CUP2009-00002) to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP97-00007 and Male/2007-00032) to expand existing accessory parking onto the subject 24,879 square- foot vacant site in an area not previously approved for development. LOCATION: 12515 SW Grant Avenue,Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S 102BB,Tax Lot 01700. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360; 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT HEARINGS OFFICER AGENDA— OCTOBER 26, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blv d., _ Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2009 PAGE 1 OF FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH GRANT STREET PARKING LOT EXPANSION CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2009-00002 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT OF APPLICATION OPPONENT OF APPLICATION - (Speaking In Favor or Neutral)- - (Speaking Against)- Name ddress,Zip ode and Phone No.(05,62,0 X74 Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. 77/fr /7794 adr Na7rrrte,Addres Zip Code and Phone No.seA ? -2 TASI ame,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. ;cid Ot2eilta;Z I Name,Address,Zi7 Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. tuatc vi S3 I S k) Na ,Addre ss Zip Code and P e ► . ' Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. ikc-Aist\(4( S C-vbw1/4+-A4ic Nam ddress,Zip Co e, and P one No. 7 Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. K66a--4 •r s .L.41 Name,Address Zip Code and a Pho No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. 'I: /'V R ✓a/ Aw4' 171;," e61/'/ 414-A(st-,1144-i I I • , COMMUNITY M SPAPE S R PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: 6605 SE Lake Road,Portland,OR 97222 The following will be considered by the PO Box 22109 Portland OR 97269-2109 • Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday Phone:503-684-0360 Fax:503-620-3433 1 October 26. 2009 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard E-mail: legals©commnewspapers.corn - Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall -I-I( A R II Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or depose and say that I am the Accounting the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue general circulation, published at Beaverton, in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to in the aforesaid county and state, as defined afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on City of Tigard that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment Notice of Public Hearing/CUP2009-00002 is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. TT11373 A copy of the application and all documents and evidence A copy of which is hereto annexed, was submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable published in the entire issue of said criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff newspaper for report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least 1 seven(7)days prior to the hearing,and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. week in the following issue: October 8, 2009 Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division I (staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner) at E4tcL( to t 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503- 2 639-4171,or by e-mail to garyp @tigard-or.gov. Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manager ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)2009-00002 Subscribed and sworn to before me this -ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH GRANT AVENUE October 8, 2009. PARKING LOT EXPANSION- PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a Major Modification (CUP2009-00002) to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP97- A� 00007 and MMD2007-00032) to expand existing accessory O UBLIC FOR OR ON parking onto the subject 24,879 square-foot vacant site in an N N commission expires area not previously approved for development. LOCATION: My 12515 SW Grant Avenue, Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S 102BB, Tax Lot 01700. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Acct#10093001 Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to Attn: Patty Lunsford ,accommodate detached single-family homes with or without City of Tigard 'accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 13125 SW Hall Blvd square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are Tigard, OR 97223 permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, Size: 2x 10.75 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, Amount Due$179.53* 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. `Please remit to address above. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by St. Anthony's Catholic Church) FINAL ORDER for a conditional use permit to expand an existing parking ) CUP2009-00002 lot at 9870 SW Johnson Street onto an adjacent parcel ) ( St. Anthony's at 12515 SW Grant Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) Parking Lot) A. SUMMARY 1. Architect Drew Rocker filed the application for St. Anthony's Catholic Church (the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to expand the existing 49-space accessory parking lot at 9870 SW Johnson Street onto a vacant 0.57-acre parcel at 12515 SW Grant Avenue. The legal description of the parcels is Washington County tax lots 01600 (9870 SW Johnson Street) and 01700 (12515 SW Grant Avenue), 2S102BB (collectively the "site"). The site and surrounding properties to the north, south and west are zoned R-4.5 (Low-Density Residential). Properties to the east, across Grant Avenue, are zoned R-12 (Medium-Density Residential).The applicant proposed to construct the parking lot expansion on the southeastern portion of tax lot 1700, abutting Grant Avenue. The northwestern portion of tax lot 1700 will remain undeveloped. The proposed expansion will result in a total 87-parking spaces (existing and proposed) on the site. The parking lot will serve the adjacent St. Anthony's Church and School, located southeast of the site, across SW Grant Avenue, at 9905 SW McKenzie Street. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated October 19, 2009 (the " Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer") conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant and one area resident testified in support of the application. Four other persons testified with questions and concerns about the design of the parking lot. Disputed issue in this case include: a. Whether the proposed development will increase the volume of runoff flowing onto adjacent properties; b. Whether the proposed buffer and screening comply with the Code; c. Whether the headlights of vehicles on the site will impact adjacent residents; d. Whether the applicant is required to provide wheelstops or curbs to prevent vehicles from impacting landscaped areas on the site; e. Whether the applicant can be required to modify landscaping in the existing parking lot on tax lot 1600; f. Whether the parking lot and vacant area will be an attractive nuisance and provide a haven for criminal activity; g. Whether security lights on the site will impact adjacent properties; h. Whether the applicant is required to provide a mix of compact and standard sized parking spaces on the site; i. Whether the proposed parking spaces are subject to the dimensional standards in TDC Figure 18.765.1; and j. Whether the applicant provides a sufficient number of ADA accessible parking spaces, based on the total number of parking spaces serving the church and school. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the application complies with the applicable approval criteria for a conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on October 26, 2009 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Gary Pagenstecher summarized the Staff Report and responded to testimony from the applicant's representatives. He noted that the City originally approved a parking lot on the site in 2007. The applicant built the portion of the parking lot on tax lot 1600. With this application, the applicant proposes to modify the existing parking lot on tax lot 1600 and provide additional parking spaces on the southeastern portion of tax lot 1700. a. In response to a question from the hearings officer, he noted that the applicant is required to provide a certain number of ADA accessible parking spaces based on the total number of parking spaces serving the use. He opined that the applicant has sufficient existing ADA spaces on the adjacent church/school site. b. He agreed with Mr. Rocker that the proposed head-in parking spaces are subject to the dimensional standards of TDC 18.765.040N(1), rather than TDC Figure 18.765.1. c. He agreed with Mr. Rocker that the parking space overhang will not extend into the required buffer area. However vehicles will extend into the required landscaped buffer unless the applicant shifts the curb or provides a wheel stop as required by TDC 18.765.040.J. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 2 d. He noted that the applicant's proposed buffer is insufficient to comply with the requirements for a Type D buffer in TDC Table 18.745.2. This Table provides three options to fulfill the Type D requirement: a ten-foot wide buffer and a six-foot wall; a 15-foot buffer and a six-foot fence; or a 20-foot buffer and a six-foot hedge. The applicant proposed to provide a ten- foot buffer and a six-foot fence. The applicant could propose an alternative buffer pursuant to 18.745.050.A(3). But the current buffer proposal is inadequate to comply with the Code. In the alternative, the applicant could replace the proposed fence with a six-foot wall. A six-inch wide, double sided, fence can qualify as a wall as defined by TDC 18.745050.B(8). e. He expressed concern that the proposed fence, located two to three feet from the edge of the buffer, may limit the mature size of the landscaping and reduce the effectiveness of the buffer landscaping. The applicant should be required to move the fence to the edge of the buffer to maximize the area available for landscape growth. f. He noted that the applicant is required to provide an additional tree or other vertical shrubbery along the site's Grant Avenue frontage to comply with the screening requirements of TDC 18.745.050.E. However the vehicle overhang area of the three parking spaces located along SW Grant Avenue appear to extend into the buffer area. Condition of approval 5 requires that the applicant provide a revised plan that complies with the screening requirement and eliminates the vehicle overhang within the buffer. g. He argued that the City has jurisdiction to require improvements to the existing parking lot on tax lot 1600, because tax lot 1600 is part of the current application and the applicant is proposing revisions to that parking lot. 3. Architect Drew Rocker and St. Anthony's Building Committee Member John L. Cook testified for the applicant. a. Mr. Rocker accepted the findings and conditions in the Staff Report, with certain exceptions. He testified that the applicant must remove five of the existing parking spaces along the southern border of tax lot 1600 in order to expand the stormwater swale. The applicant will remove additional spaces along the southern boundary of tax lot 1600 to provide access to the expanded parking lot on tax lot 1700. The proposed expansion will result in a total of 87 parking spaces on the site. The applicant previously constructed frontage improvements along the site's Grant Avenue frontage. The applicant will replace the existing"speed table" with a raised crosswalk meeting City standards. i. He noted that the applicant proposed to provide head-in, rather than angled, parking spaces on the site. Therefore parking on this site is subject to the parking space dimensional requirements of TDC 18.765.040N(1), rather than TDC Figure 18.765.1. He requested the hearings officer modify condition of approval 2 to that effect. ii. He testified that the proposed parking spaces will not impact the required buffer areas along the boundaries of the parking lot. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 3 iii. He requested the hearings officer delete condition of approval 3, which requires that the applicant provide a 50/50 mix of compact and standard sized parking spaces on the site. Although the applicant proposed to provide all compact spaces on this site, the applicant provides more than 200 standard sized parking spaces on the church/school site across Grant Avenue from the site. Therefore more than 70-percent of the parking spaces serving the church/school are standard sized spaces,well over the minimum 50-percent requirement of the Code. The applicant could redesign the parking lot on the site to provide a 50/50 mix of compact and standard sized parking spaces on this site. But the applicant would need to restripe the parking lot across the street to provide additional compact parking spaces on that site and fulfill the applicant's overall parking needs. iv. He requested the hearings officer delete condition 6, which requires an additional landscape island in the parking lot on tax lot 1600. The City has no jurisdiction to require additional improvements on tax lot 1600, because no new development is proposed on that lot. In addition, the applicant cannot provide a landscape island on the east end of the interior parking stalls without impacting the pipes serving the existing catch basin on tax lot 1600. v. He agreed to provide a pedestrian connection between the parking lot and the Grant Avenue sidewalk to facilitate access to the crosswalk near the southwest corner of the site as recommended in the Staff Report. vi. He testified that the applicant proposed to construct a six-foot high fence between the edge of the parking lot and the remaining, undeveloped, portion of tax lot 1700 in order to ensure that headlights from cars on the site do not shine into the homes on adjacent properties. He agreed to install a gate in the fence to allow access to the undeveloped portion of tax lot 1700 for maintenance purposes. vii. He agreed to a condition of approval requiring the applicant demonstrate compliance with the ADA parking requirements based on the total number of parking spaces serving the church and school. viii. He argued that the proposed development will not increase, and may reduce, the volume of stormwater flowing onto adjacent properties. The site currently slopes towards neighboring properties. The applicant proposed to grade the parking lot to flow away from adjacent properties and towards a catch basin near the center of the site. If necessary, the applicant can install an area drain near the west corner of the site to collect runoff and ensure the development does not increase runoff onto Ms. Tubbs' property. ix. He noted that the adjacent properties to the northwest of the site are lower than the site. Therefore relocating the fence to the property line will reduce the effective height of the fence and allow the headlights of vehicles in the parking lot to shine into adjacent homes. He agreed to move the fence to the edge of the buffer to accommodate growth of the proposed buffer landscaping. The applicant will shift the fence to the east edge of the buffer where the adjacent properties are lower than the site and to the west edge of the buffer where the adjacent properties are higher than the site. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 4 x. He testified that the applicant will light the parking lot at night for security purposes. The applicant will design and shield the lights to shine downward and ensure they do not cast glare onto adjacent properties. The applicant cannot preclude pedestrian access to the parking lot. However, if necessary, the applicant can provide a chain or other barrier across the driveways to prevent vehicular access when the Church is not using the parking lot. b. Mr. Cook argued that improvements to the swale on tax lot 1600 are not "substantial improvements" sufficient to justify modifications to the existing parking lot. 4. Jim Murray questioned whether the applicant will maintain the vacant area on the west end of tax lot 1700. He expressed concern that fencing off this area will create a hidden area on the site that will provide a haven for criminal activity. People can climb the fence to access this hidden area. He questioned how the applicant will access this vacant area for maintenance. He expressed concern that the proposed parking lot will increase drainage and flooding problems on his property north of the site. The site currently drains towards his property. The parking lot will be substantially higher than his property and the new impervious surface area will increase the volume of runoff. 5. Jim Brown opined that the parking lot is needed to alleviate an existing safety hazard. On street parking on Grant Avenue limits visibility for drivers and pedestrians. He has seen several accidents in the area as a result of on-street parking activities. The proposed parking lot will eliminate the need for on-street parking. 6. Kim Tubbs expressed concern that headlights from cars in the parking lot may shine into her home, located southwest of the vacant portion of tax lot 1700. Her property is lower than the site and her home is angled towards the site, so headlights of vehicles on the site will shine into her windows. Development on the site may increase the volume of water flowing onto her property. The site slopes towards her property and directs stormwater runoff into her yard. The ditch adjacent to her driveway is near capacity under existing conditions. Creating additional paved areas on the site will increase the volume of stormwater runoff from the site. She testified that people often use the existing parking lot to light fireworks and other illegal activities. 7. Tim McCarthy expressed concerns with the security of the parking lot. He has observed drug deals occurring in the existing parking lot on tax lot 1600. Expansion of the parking lot onto tax lot 1700 may exacerbate the problem. He questioned whether the applicant will install security cameras on the site. 8. Robert Bogden testified that there is a heavy flow of stormwater drainage across the site under existing conditions. He argued that the applicant should not be allowed to light the undeveloped area in the rear of tax lot 1700. 9. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the application subject to conditions. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 5 C. DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies them to the record in the case.The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the TDC. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own, except to the extent inconsistent with the following findings. 2. Several persons expressed concerns with existing runoff and stormwater ponding problems in the area. The applicant is not required to remedy all existing and perceived problems. The Code only prohibits the applicant from making things worse. However the hearings officer finds that the proposed development will not increase the overall volume of runoff flowing onto adjacent properties. To the contrary, the proposed development is likely to reduce the overall volume of stormwater runoff flowing onto adjacent properties. The topography maps in the record demonstrate that stormwater falling on this site flows downhill to the west, and northwest, onto the adjoining properties, under existing conditions. The applicant proposed to grade the parking lot to direct stormwater runoff away from surrounding properties and towards existing and proposed catch basins. The catch basins will pipe the collected runoff to a stormwater facility in the northeast corner of tax lot 1600 for treatment, detention and discharge to the public storm sewer system at less than predevelopment rates. The proposed stormwater facilities will capture runoff that would otherwise flow onto adjacent properties and divert it to the stormwater facility. The vacant portion of tax lot 1700 will continue to drain towards adjacent properties. But the new impervious areas of the site will drain to the stormwater facility, significantly reducing the total area of the site that drains towards adjacent properties. 3. The hearings officer finds that headlights of vehicles operating on the site will not impact adjacent residents. The applicant proposed to install a six-foot high fence or wall and landscaping along those boundaries of the site abutting residential uses. See Plan Sheets A100 and L1.0. Where the site is higher than adjacent properties, the height of the fence must be measured from the level of the parking lot. TDC 18.745.050.D(2). This will ensure that the fence is tall enough to block the headlights of vehicles on the site. 4. The hearings officer finds that the proposed landscape buffer does not comply with the Code. The applicant is required to provide a Type D buffer between the proposed parking lot and the adjacent residential uses. The proposed ten-foot landscape buffer and six-foot fence does not constitute a Type D buffer as defined by TDC Table 18.745.2.D. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 6 a. The hearings officer finds that the applicant can modify the buffer design to comply with the Code. The applicant can replace the proposed fence with a six-foot wall, expand the width of the landscape buffer or propose an alternative buffer pursuant to 18.745.050.A(3) that affords the same degree of buffering and screening as a standard Type D buffer. This is required by condition of approval 6. b. The applicant should be required to locate the fence/wall at the edge of the buffer as shown in TDC Table 18.745.2 in order to provide sufficient area for the landscaping to mature. The fence/wall may be located at either boundary of the buffer, provided it is located at sufficient elevation to shield adjacent homes from headlights of vehicles operating on the site. Condition of approval 6 should be modified to that effect. 5. As noted in the staff report, the applicant must provide additional screening along the site's Grant Avenue frontage in order to comply with TDC 18.745.050.E. The applicant will need to revise the parking spaces in this area to ensure parked vehicles do not extend into the landscape area. This is required by condition 7. 6. As noted in the Staff Report, TDC 18.765.040.J requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks must be provided with a wheel stop located three feet back from the front of the parking stall to ensure that parked vehicles do not overhang these areas. The applicant's plans provide a curb located 1.5 feet back from the edge of the landscaped areas. The applicant should be required to relocate the curb or provide wheel stops as necessary to allow a minimum three-foot vehicle overhang outside of required landscape and buffer areas as required by TDC 18.765.040.J.A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. 7. The applicant proposed to modify the existing parking lot on tax lot 1600.Therefore the applicant must modify this existing parking lot as necessary to bring it into compliance with the current Code, including the provision of landscape islands. a. Condition of approval 6 in the Staff Report requires that the applicant provide an additional landscape island and two trees at the east end of the interior parking stalls on tax lot 1600. The applicant did not dispute the need for the additional trees, but expressed concern that a tree island in this location may conflict with the pipes serving the existing storm drain on tax lot 1600. TDC 18.745.050.E(4) requires a certain number of trees planted in islands "equally distributed" throughout the parking lot.The hearings officer finds that the applicant can modify the parking lot landscape plan to comply with this requirement while avoiding the existing underground pipes,i.e., by locating the landscape island within the center row of parking spaces,to the west of the storm drain. Condition of approval 6 in the Staff Report should be modified to that effect. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 7 8. Neighboring residents expressed concerns that the parking lot and vacant area in the northwest end of tax lot 1700 will be an attractive nuisance and provide a haven for criminal activity. The hearings officer acknowledges that any unused and unoccupied open area presents an opportunity for vandalism and other anti-social and criminal behavior. It is impossible to completely eliminate such activities. This development does not pose a unique risk of such activities. Furthermore, the applicant designed, and can maintain, the site to limit the potential for such impacts. a. Landscaping along the Grant Avenue and Johnson Street frontages of the site is designed to allow surveillance of the parking lot by drivers and pedestrians using these abutting streets, which will discourage potential illegal activities. The applicant will install security lighting throughout the developed portion of the site, which will allow 24-hour surveillance of the parking lot. i. The applicant's lighting diagram(Sheet ELi) demonstrates that lights on the site will not have a significant impact on adjacent properties. Light levels at the perimeter of the site will not exceed 0.2-foot candles.The proposed buffer and screening around the perimeter of the site will further mitigate the impact of lights on the site and limit potential glare onto adjoining residential properties. b. The applicant proposed to retain the northern portion of tax lot 1700 in its existing, undeveloped, state. Existing and proposed fences and landscaping will enclose this area and screen it from view. The proposed on-site screening is necessary to screen the site from adjacent residential properties and ensure that vehicle headlights do not impact adjacent residences. The applicant must balance the need for security and surveillance against the need to buffer adjacent properties. The hearings officer finds that the proposed development strikes the proper balance. Any area that is screened from view may provide a location for illegal activity. However this area will not pose an unusual risk of such behavior. i. This vacant area, located in the back corner of the site, behind a fence and landscape buffer, will not be obvious to potential trespassers. The fence will create a barrier to all but the most determined trespassers. ii. Some persons may climb the fence to access this area. However this portion of the site is vacant. Potential unlawful activities are largely limited to camping, graffiti and the accumulation of litter. The applicant can limit the potential for such impacts by periodically inspecting and cleaning the vacant area to ensure that it does not become a camping or dumping area. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. iii. The applicant should be allowed to provide a gate in the buffer fence to facilitate access to the vacant portion of tax lot 1700 for maintenance personnel and equipment. The gate should be locked at all times, except when maintenance activities are occurring. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. 9. The hearings officer finds that the applicant should be required to provide a 50-50 mix of standard and compact parking spaces on this site as required by TDC 18.765.040.N. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 8 a. The applicant argued that the Church complies with this requirement, based on the overall mix of parking serving the church and school. Although all of the parking spaces on the site are designed as compact spaces, all of the existing parking spaces on the church/school site across Grant Avenue from the site are standard sized spaces. Therefore well over 50-percent of the total parking spaces on the site are standard sized spaces, consistent with TDC 18.765.040.N. b. The hearings officer finds that the applicant must design this parking lot to accommodate the expected use of the lot. The parking lot on this site is proposed to accommodate overflow parking demand during large events at the church/school. Most drivers park as close as possible to their destination; in this case, the church or school. Therefore the parking spaces on the church/school site are likely to fill up first with a mix of standard and compact sized vehicles. Persons arriving later will be forced to use the parking spaces on this site, across the street from the church/school. Late arriving drivers will drive a mix of standard and compact sized vehicles, generating a need for both compact and standard sized parking spaces on this site. Therefore the applicant should be required to provide a mix of standard sized parking spaces on this site to accommodate the expected demand. This is required by condition of approval 3. i. Redesigning the parking lot on this site to provide a mix of compact and standard parking spaces may reduce the total number of parking spaces available to serve the church/school use. The applicant can restripe the existing parking lot on the church/school site as necessary to meet its overall parking needs, subject to any required City approvals. 10. The hearings officer finds that TDC Figure 18.765.1 only applies to "angled parking spaces," based on the plain meaning of the words in TDC 18.765.040.N(1), which provides, in relevant part: "Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are..." (Emphasis added). Angled parking is not proposed on this site. Therefore TDC Figure 18.765.1 is inapplicable and the parking spaces are subject to the dimensional requirements of TDC 18.765.040.N(1).Condition of approval 2 should be modified to that effect. 11. The applicant should be required to demonstrate that an adequate number of ADA parking spaces are provided adjacent to the School and Church, based on the overall number of parking spaces serving these uses.A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. 12. The applicant agreed to provide a pedestrian connection between the parking lot and the Grant Avenue sidewalk to facilitate access to the crosswalk near the southwest corner of the site as recommended in the Staff Report. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect to allow the City the opportunity to review the design of the connection. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 9 D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2009-00002 (St. Anthony's Parking Lot), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL ACTIVITIES: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Gary Pagenstecher, (503) 718-2434) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that includes a signature of approval by the project arborist for required tree protection for the proposed parking lot improvements. 2. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows compliance with the required space and aisle dimensions in 18.765.040.N(1). 3. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a maximum of 50%of the proposed total parking spaces on the site as compact spaces and marked as such. 4. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a compliance with the vehicle overhang requirements of TDC 18.765.040.J. 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a convenient soft or hard path connection between the southwest corner of the new arking lot and the raised cross walk in SW Grant Avenue in anticipation of an informal path that might otherwise develop to avoid out of direction travel. 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a Detailed Buffer Area Landscaping and Screening Plan consistent with the D-3 buffer type and the applicable buffering and screening standards. If the plan varies from the standards, the applicant shall demonstrate how the alternative plan affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by the code. Parking areas, including overhangs, are not allowed within any required buffers. Fences or walls shall be located at the edge of the buffer area to allow sufficient room for the buffer landscaping to grow to mature size. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 10 a. The applicant may install a gate in the buffer fence/wall to allow maintenance personnel and equipment to access the vacant portion of the site. 7. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes an additional tree or other vertical shrubbery, spaced appropriately between the two existing ponderosa pine trees and which reconciles the conflict between parking stall depth and required landscaping and screening along SW Grant Avenue. 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan including an additional island and two trees on the site. Landscape islands shall be equally distributed throughout the arking lot,consistent with TDC 18.745.050.E(4).All proposed interior islands shall be sufficient to meet the standards in the Architectural Graphic Standards for planting trees. Submit to the Development Engineer(Gus Duenas, 503-718-2470) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for the private water quality and detention facility. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans should only include sheets relevant to work within the public right-of-way and the water quality and detention facility. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 10. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. 11. Prior work authorized in the SW Grant Avenue right-of-way under Engineering Permit No. ENG 2008-00107 issued for the half street improvements, including the speed table/crosswalk must be completed and approved prior to issuance of any permits for this project. 12. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking lan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during both the public and private improvement construction phases. 13. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer(Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit 14. The applicant shall provide an on-site detention facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer(Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. 15. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20, Chapter 2). 16. The applicant shall demonstrate that an adequate number of ADA parking spaces are provided adjacent to the School and Church, based on the overall number of parking spaces serving these uses. CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St.Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 11 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SITE PERMIT IMPROVEMENTS. Submit to the Current Planning Division (Gary Pagenstecher, (503) 718-2434) for review and approval: 17. Prior to final approval of the site permit, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the project was completed per the approved plan. Submit to the Development Engineer(Gus Duenas, 503-718-2470) for review and approval: 18. The design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Development Engineer with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. 19. A maintenance plan for the water quality facility shall be submitted for review and approval. 20. The applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee is calculated using $35.00 per lineal foot of frontage parallel to the utility lines and is equal to $3,083.85. ONGOING CONDITIONS 21. The applicant shall inspect the vacant area in the rear of tax lot 1700 at least twice per week to ensure it is not being used for illegal or nuisance activities. The applicant shall maintain this vacant area in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, free from refuse and debris. 22. The maintenance access gate to the vacant portion of the site shall remain locked at all times, except when maintenance activities are occurring on the site. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION. DATED this 4`h day of November 2009. Joe urner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2009-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Parking Lot) Page 12 AGENDA ITEM NO . 2 . 1 "TAB A" Testimony Received at the Public Hearing. "TAB B" Applicant's Materials &All Correspondence Filed with Hearings Officer Prior to the Public Hearing. Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date:October 26,2009 Time:7:00PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER NI Oil FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 12 : I I SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S GRANT AVENUE PARKING LOT EXPANSION CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2009-00002 APPLICANT: Drew Rocker OWNER: St. Anthony's Catholic Church in Tigard c/o Ankram Moisan 9905 SW McKenzie St. Associates Architects Tigard, OR 97233 6720 SW Macadam Ave. Portland, OR 97219 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a new Conditional Use Permit to expand the existing 49- space accessory parking lot, permitted under CUP97-00007, onto the subject 24,879 square-foot vacant lot for a total of 87 spaces. LOCATION: 12515 SW Grant Avenue and 9870 SW Johnson Street, Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. ZONING: R-4.5: Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes, attached single-family units, some civic and institutional uses, as well as cemeteries are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 1 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL ACTIVITIES: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Gary Pagenstecher, (503) 718-2434) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that includes a signature of approval by the project arborist for required tree protection for the proposed parking lot improvements. 2. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows compliance with the required space and aisle dimensions in Figure 18.765.1. 3. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a maximum of 5O% of the proposed total parking spaces as compact space and marked as such. 4. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a Detailed Buffer Area Landscaping and Screening Plan consistent with the D-3 buffer type and the applicable buffering and screening standards. If the plan varies from the standards, the applicant shall demonstrate how the alternative plan affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by the code. Parking areas,including overhangs,are not allowed within any required buffers. 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes an additional tree or other vertical shrubbery, spaced appropriately between the two existing ponderosa pine trees and which reconciles the conflict between parking stall depth and required landscaping and screening along SW Grant Avenue. 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan including an additional island and two trees on the east end of the interior parking stalls. The proposed interior islands shall be sufficient to meet the standards in the Architectural Graphic Standards for planting trees. 7. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that a convenient soft or hard path connection be offered between the southwest corner of the new parking lot and the raised cross walk in SW Grant Avenue in anticipation of an informal path that might otherwise develop to avoid out of direction travel. Submit to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas, 503-718-2470) for review and approval: 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for the private water quality and detention facility. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Development Engineer. NOTE: these plans should only include sheets relevant to work within the public right-of-way and the water quality and detention facility. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and tae City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 9. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Development Engineer will delay processing of project documents. 10. Prior work authorized in the SW Grant Avenue right-of-way under Engineering Permit No.ENG 2008-00107 issued for the half street improvements, including the speed table/crosswalk must be completed and approved prior to issuance of any permits for this project. ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 2 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during both the public and private improvement construction phases. 12. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit 13. The applicant shall provide an on-site detention facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. 14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Resolution and Order No. 07-20,Chapter 2). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SITE PERMIT IMPROVEMENTS. Submit to the Current Planning Division (Gary Pagenstecher, (503) 718-2434) for review and approval: 15. Prior to final approval of the site permit, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the project was completed per the approved plan. Submit to the Development Engineer (Gus Duenas,503-718-2470) for review and approval: 16. The design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Development Engineer with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. 17. A maintenance plan for the water quality facility shall be submitted for review and approval. 18. The applicant shall pay the fee-in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee is calculated using $35.00 per lineal foot of frontage parallel to the utility lines and is equal to$3,083.85. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The applicant proposes a new Conditional Use Permit to expand the existing 49 space accessory parking lot CUP 77 0000 onto the subject 24,879 square-foot vacant site for a total of 87 spaces. Site and Vicinity Information: The proposed site is a vacant lot which slopes away from SW Grant Avenue to the north approximately six feet over the 310 foot length of the lot and is currently vegetated with lawn. Four parcels abut the site although eight residences are in close proximity to the site and may be adversely affected by the proposed parking lot improvement. Site History: BUP97-00256 permitted demolition of an existing metal building and concrete foundation on Tax Lot 1700; sewer was capped and all debris was removed from the site. The site had been used for fuel storage by the Sunset Fuel Company. CUP97-00007 proposed parking lot improvements on Tax Lot 1600 and a portion of Tax Lot 1700. The validity of the permit was extended a year because of complications with a DEQ permit for contamination on Lot 1700. Ultimately, the applicant constructed only the Tax Lot 1600 improvements. The proposed ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 3 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER parking includes a minor mocuncation of the existing conditional use and a new conditional use for the adjacent vacant tax lot. MMD2007-00032 approved a parking lot expansion on Tax Lots 1600 and 1700 with conditions of approval for right-of-way improvements to SW Grant Ave including dedication of right-of-way and half street improvements, in particular providing for preserving existing trees with a sidewalk meander and allowing a mid-block pedestrian crossing. The decision became void on May 8, 2009 when the approval had not been acted on by the applicant within the 18-month approval period. Subsequently, the Tigard Engineering Department came to agreement with the applicant (ENG2008-00107) to improve the Grant Avenue right-of way in front of Tax Lot 1700 pursuant to the conditions of approval of MMD2007-00032 in order for the improvements to be completed prior to the beginning o the 2009-2010 school year. Therefore, the current application (CUP2009 00002) will not require further public facilities improvements for Tax Lot 1700. Neighbor Comments: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on April 22, 2009 with eight people in attendance. Neighbors were concerned about potential crime and safety with respect to the remaining undeveloped portion of the subject site to the rear. Lighting, fencing, landscaping, drainage,and access were discussed. In addition, Bill Tubbs, of 12531 SW Grant Avenue, commented by email to the city stating that he felt strongly that building the parking lot would devalue his property and infringe on his family's privacy and cause safety concerns. He urged denial of the proposal and asked how he could ensure his concerns could be addressed if unable to attend the hearing. Mr. Tubb's property includes a flag lot access to SW Grant Avenue along the length of the subject property's southwest border. Staff Response to Mr. Tubb's Concerns: A staff report to the Hearings Officer will be available on Monday the 19th. A copy will be mailed to Mr. Tubbs for his review. Written comments addressed to the Hearings Officer should address specific development standards and how the proposal may not be consistent with the standard. Participation in the hearing is advised, but it is not necessary to have standing for appeal. For an appeal, a statement of intent to appeal must be received by the City within ten business days of the Hearings Officer's decision. Submittal or written comment will provide standing and notice of the decision and your right to appeal. If there are any questions, call Gary Pagenstecher at 503-718-2434. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Chapter 18.130 lists the Use Categories. The proposed parking lot is an accessory use to the St. Anthony's School and Church which is permitted as a conditional use in the R-4.5 zone. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject toother requirements in this chapter. Type III-HO procedures apply to quasi- judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Section is in Section VI of this report. A. Zoning Districts 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.390 - Decision Making Procedures ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 4 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 -Landscaping and Screening 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.780 - Signs 18.790 - Tree Removal 18.795 -Visual Clearance 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards C. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Residential Zoning Districts (Chapter 18.510) Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The proposed site is in an R-4.5 zone. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes, attached single-family units, some civic and institutional uses, as well as cemeteries are permitted conditionally. The proposed parking use is accessory to the St. Anthony's School and Church use, which is permitted conditionally in the R-4.5 zone. Table 18.510 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. These standards relate to the placement and design of residential structures, none of which are applicable to the proposed accessory parking use. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and section. The applicant requests approval of a new conditional use for the proposed site. The site is a single-family residential lot and the applicant is requesting a change of use to accessory parking for the St. Anthony's School and Church. APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; There are no minimum size or dimension standards for the proposed accessory parking use except that the site must be developed consistent with the Off-Street Surface Parking Matrix requirements per Figure 18.765.1. Staff finds that the proposed parking lot design is not consistent with requirements of Figure 18.765.1 (page 17). The proposed parking expansion is m anticipation of the Phase 1B expansion of the School and Church campus (CUP 2002-00006) which would also include an 18,500 square foot Community Center (MMD2007-00031). The subject site may be large enough for an expansion but will require some reconfiguration. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 5 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed site is 0.57 acres (24,829 square feet). The primary activity on the site will be accessory parking. The applicant proposes retaining a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet for future development at the north end of the property. The site is relatively flat, sloping down to the north approximately 2%. There are no trees on the site with the exception of the protected ponderosa pine in the Grant Avenue right-of-way. The impacts of the proposed use can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. This criterion is met. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and The proposed use only requires additional storm drainage water quality and detention as provided in the March 19, 2009 Storm Drainage Report prepared by Westlake Consultants. Therefore, this criterion is met. MMD2007-00032 approved a parking lot expansion on Tax Lots 1600 and 1700 with conditions of approval for right-of-way improvements to SW Grant Ave including dedication of right-of-way and half street improvements, in particular providing for preserving existing trees with a sidewalk meander and allowing a mid-block pedestrian crossing. The decision became void on May 8, 2009 when the approval had not been acted on by the applicant within the 18-month approval period. Subsequently, the Tigard Engineering Department came to agreement with the applicant (ENG2008-00107) to improve the Grant Avenue right-of way in front of Tax Lot 1700 pursuant to the conditions of approval of MMD2007-00032 in order for the improvements to be completed rior to the beginning of the 2009-2010 school year. Therefore, the current application (CUP2009-00002) will not require further public facilities improvements for Tax Lot 1700. This criterion is met. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. Table 18.510 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. These standards relate to the placement and design of residential structures, none of which are applicable to the proposed accessory parking use. This criterion does not apply. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and Section 18.330.050 does not include standards for accessory parking. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Decision-Making Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765 Off-Site Parking and Loading; 18.780 Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. All other code chapters are inapplicable as approval standards. As reviewed above and below in this report, all applicable requirements of the code are either met or conditioned to be met. FINDING: With the recommended conditions of approval, or others that the Hearings officer may apply, the proposed accessory parking can meet the applicable approval standards for a conditional use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE. The Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 6 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The hours, days and manner of operation for the proposed parking use will correspond to the School and Church programming which were not explicitly identified in the applicant's submittal. Assuming typical parking for these types of use, staff would not anticipate the need to limit the use of the proposed parking lot. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The proposed parking use does not typically generate significant noise,vibrations, air pollution,glare, odor and/or dust. However, noise, air pollution and glare typically associated with automobile parking can be expected. These impacts are addressed in the Landscaping and Screening section of this report (pages 13- 15), which requires combinations of buffers, landscaping and screening to mitigate for any potential off- site automobile impacts Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The applicant has chosen to apply the D-3 buffer which includes a 10-foot buffer and a 6-foot wall. However, the applicant proposes to replace the wall with a fence. The D-2 buffer option requires a buffer of 15 feet and a 6-foot fence. The applicant's site development plan shows that the site is constrained in width to sufficiently accommodate the required buffers and the proposed parking layout. Staff recommends conditions of approval to address these conflicts (page 13-15). Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; No buildings are proposed. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; The existing access on SW Grant is proposed to remain unaltered to serve the existing and expanded parking lot. Table 18.705.3 states that for 0-99 parking spaces, the minimum number of driveways required is 1, minimum access width is 30 feet, and minimum pavement is 24 feet with curbs. The existing access complies with these standards. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; The applicant has dedicated 30 feet from center line on SW Grant Avenue as required by the Engineering Department to accommodate the required public facilities improvements. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Staff has found that the applicable landscaping and screening standards have not been met including the D-3 buffer standards and the special parking lot landscaping provisions (pages 13-15).Staff recommends conditions of approval. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; No signs are proposed with the exception of parking and directional signs for which no permit is required. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has proposed sufficient outdoor lighting for safe use of the facility at night as shown in the Lighting diagram (Sheet EL1). The applicant's Lighting diagram (Sheet ELI) shows a light level of 0.2 FC at the periphery o f the parking lot paved area with the light level rising slightly in the vicinity of Pole #1 in the northwest portion of the site. Light at the property line on the southwest, northwest and northeast will be significantly less because of the additional 10-foot buffer area and landscaping and screening, resulting in minor spill over onto adjoining residential properties. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; These features of the proposal are addressed in detail in Landscaping and Screening section of this report ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 7 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER (pages 13-15). Staff finds that not all of the applicable standards have been met and recommends conditions of approval. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; According to the applicant's submittal the proposed fences are located within the required buffer areas which may conflict with landscaping and parking stall depth standards. Staff has recommend conditions of approval to address this apparent conflict (pages 13-15). Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Protection of the existing ponderosa pine trees along Grant Avenue are ensured through a recommended condition of approval that requires the project arborist to sign off on proposed tree protection measures on a revised Site Development Plan. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and The proposed site is approximately 300 feet south of the Fanno Creek floodplain. The highest elevation of the nearest floodplain is 153 feet. The lowest elevation of the subject site is approximately 164 feet. Therefore, a condition to this effect would not be applicable. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposed site is not within a floodplain. Therefore, a condition to this effect would not be applicable. FINDING: The Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. Staff finds that the proposed accessory parking does not meet all of the applicable conditional use criteria as shown in findings in the following sections of this staff report and makes recommended conditions of approval. Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments. The proposed change of use is considered new development which requires a conditional use. Therefore, the applicable site development review criteria shall apply. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; The City's Development Review Engineer commented that storm drainage and undergrounding of overhead utilities are issues for the proposed parking lot. Frontage improvements have otherwise been required and implemented by prior agreement with the Development Review Engineer pursuant to the findings, conclusions and conditions of MMD2007-00032. As demonstrated in this report the proposal meets or has been conditioned to meet all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 8 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. No buildings are being proposed. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. The applicant proposes to retain all trees. Therefore, this criterion is met. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Staff finds that the applicant' site development plan does not comply with the proposed D-3 buffer which requires a wall instead of the proposed fence for a 10-foot buffer. In addition, the proposed location of the fence is in conflict with the parking stall 3-foot overhang standard. Recommended conditions of approval have been made below in the Landscaping and Screening section of the report (pages 13-15). Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and these areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Neighbors have commented that the back portion the subject lot may represent a public safety concern if required buffer screening is put in place per the applicant's Site Development Plan. The effect of the 6- foot fence or wall screen across the property would be to eliminate public view of the 7,500 square foot area from SW Grant Street, creating an area difficult to monitor for criminal activity. Crime prevention and safety: Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has roposed sufficient outdoor lighting for safe use of the facility at night as shown in the Lighting diagram (Sheet FT,1). The Lighting diagram shows a minimum light level of 0.2 FC at the periphery of the parking lot paved area, sufficient to illuminate a person. Public Transit. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route. The proposed accessory parking is located in excess of 600 feet from SW Walnut and approximately 1000 feet from HWY99 W and the bus routes and stops on those streets. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Landscaping: a.All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 and a minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The applicant's Site Development Plan shows that a 7,500 square foot area to be retained in open space ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EK'P. PAGE 9 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER and is planted in lawn. In adamon, the improvements include a ten foot buffer approximately 340 feet in length. Together this represents approximately 43% of the site in landscaping, consistent with this standard. However, as shown in the findings for the Landscaping and Screening section of this report (pages 13-15), the buffer and parking lot landscaping standards have not been met. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; The applicant has submitted a Storm Drainage Report to address construction of new impervious surface area, consistent with the Storm Drainage requirements of 18.810 as reviewed and conditioned elsewhere in this report. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Provisions for the disabled are required for required walkways within commercial, institutional, industrial and multi-family residential sites (Chapter 18.705) as well as for parking lots (Chapter 18.765). The proposed parking lot expansion may be required to provide for additional ADA parking spaces adjacent to the School and Church depending on the overall number of parking spaces. This will be determined at the time of site permit review through the Building Department. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. (Ord. 02-33) Staff has reviewed this proposal with all applicable provisions of the underlying zone. The application is not for a planned development and the applicant has not requested any variances or adjustments. FINDING: According the analysis above, not all of the applicable site development review standards are met but have been conditioned to be met elsewhere in this report. Of particular interest is the size, density and location of the buffer that would be appropriate given the potential for adverse effects of the proposed development on the adjouung residential uses. Access, Egress and Circulation (Chapter 18.705) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The applicant submitted a plan set including Sheet A1.00, which shows the proposed access, egress and circulation. This standard is satisfied. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant owns both Tax Lots 1600 and 1700. The proposed parking lot expansion onto Tax Lot 1700 includes using the existing Grant Avenue access on Tax Lot 1600. Deeds on file for the respective Tax Lots is satisfactory legal evidence to establish the joint use. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 10 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER at the required standards on a continuous basis. The site has frontage and access on SW Grant Avenue, consistent with this standard. Required Walkway Location On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Although this standard does not directly apply to the proposed development, the issues raised highlight a potential conflict with the proposed pedestrian route from the new parking area to the School and Church, which would most likely use the new raised crosswalk across SW Grant Avenue located at the southwest corner of the subject site. Typically, people will not go significantly out of the direction of travel if a shorter in-direction option is available. The applicant's Site Development Plan shows the proposed pedestrian route would be as much as 200 feet out of direction travel to use the existing sidewalk adjacent to the parking lot accessway. Alternatively, there is a direct route of approximately 30 feet in length through a proposed landscaped area between the parking lot and the public sidewalk on Grant. Staff suggests that a convenient soft or hard path connection be offered between the southwest corner of the new parking lot and the raised cross walk in SW Grant Avenue in anticipation of an informal path that might otherwise develop to avoid out of direction travel. Public Street Access (18.705.030.D): All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030(I) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is adjacent to an existing parking lot and will utilize the existing parking lot's approved access to SW Grant Avenue.Therefore, this criterion is met. Access Management (18.705.030.H): Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant submitted a Technical Memorandum by Kittleson Associates dated November 12, 2002. The memorandum addresses the planned ohased development of the School and Church facilities but does not mention explicitly the subject par.ung lot expansion. Since the previously approved parking lot access will be used for the expansion lot, no substantive change to the design of driveways and streets will occur. Therefore, the access report requirement is not necessary. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet,measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Since the previously approved parking lot access will be used for the expansion lot, no substantive change to the design of driveways and streets will occur. Therefore,this standard is not applicable. Section 18.705.030.H. 3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an collector shall be 200 feet; along arterial shall be 600 feet; and along a local street shall be 125 feet. ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 11 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Since the previously approved parking lot access will be used for the expansion lot, no substantive change to the design of driveways and streets will occur. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. FINDING: According the analysis above, all of the applicable access, egress and circulation standards have been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that a convenient soft or hard path connection be offered between the southwest corner of the new parking lot and the raised cross walk in SW Grant Avenue in anticipation of an informal path that might otherwise develop to avoid out of direction travel. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: The proposed parking use does not typically generate noise, visible emissions, vibrations, odors, glare, heat, insects and rodents. However, noise and glare typically associated with automobile parking can be expected. These impacts are addressed in the following Landscaping and Screening section of the code which requires combinations of buffers, landscaping and screening to mitigate for any potential off-site automobile impacts. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) 18.745.030.0 General Provisions Installation Requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 12 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Architects' Architectural Graptuc Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. Street Trees (18.745.040): All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Street trees and other public improvements are not required for this phase of the project. Buffering and Screening(18.745.050): General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles; 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The applicant has proposed a buffer type D-3 with a 10 foot buffer and a 6 foot sight-obscuring fence. Type D-3 buffer with a 10 foot buffer requires a 6 foot wall (Option 3). Therefore, the proposed buffering and screening of adjacent single-family dwellings does not meet the requirements in Table 18.745.2. The applicant has not applied for a variance to this standard. However, Section 18.745.050.A.3 allows the applicant to submit a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The applicant's Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.0) does not include the fence but does include the required plant materials. The applicant's Site Development Plan Sheet (A1.00) shows the proposed 6 foot fence within a 10-foot buffer setback, located approximately 2 to 3 feet from the edge of curb. In addition, the existing split rail fence is retained within the buffer on the southwest boundary of the subject lot. Without a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan, the potential conflict between the proposed fences and the required landscaping is hard to reconcile. Therefore, a condition shall require the applicant to submit a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan consistent with the D-3 buffer type and the applicable buffering and screening standards. If the plan varies from the standards, the applicant shall demonstrate how the alternative plan affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by the code. Buffering and screening requirements (18.745.050.B): 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses; 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City; 3. A fence, hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements,which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of Sections 18.745.050.B.8 and 18.745.050.D; ST.ANI'HON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 13 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shah consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.1. In addition, improvements shall meet the following specifications: a. At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height above grade for deciduous trees and a minimum height of five feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing for trees shall be as follows: (1) Small or narrow-stature trees, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at maturity shall be spaced no further than 15 feet apart; (2) Medium-sized trees between 25 feet to 40 feet tall and with 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; (3) Large trees, over 40 feet tall and with more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity, shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. The applicant has proposed a type D-3 buffer between the parking lot and adjacent land uses. The applicant's Site Development Plan (Sheet A1.00) shows that a portion of the proposed 10-foot buffer includes a 1.5-foot overhang to meet the stall depth dimension for compact spaces. Pursuant to 18.745.050.B.2 above, no parking areas may be allowed within a buffer. Therefore, this standard has not been met. The applicant has been conditioned above to submit a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan consistent with applicable standards,including section 18.745.050.B.2. Screening: special provisions. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Parking lot screening appears to be acceptable as a buffer with screening is required on the southwest, northwest and northeast sides of the parking lot. However, the applicant's Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.0) shows the Grant Avenue frontage only minimally screened with Kinnikinnick groundcover and viburnum shrubs, but no trees. A complicating factor in the proposed design is that the three parking spaces located along SW Grant Avenue are three to four feet from the property line and rely on a three foot overhang to meet stall depth resulting in a portion of the parking lot landscaping being included within the right-of- way. Therefore, the parking area screening and landscaping standards are not met. The applicant shall submit a revise landscape plan that includes an additional tree or other vertical shrubbery spaced appropriately between the two existing ponderosa pine trees and which reconciles the conflict between parking stall depth and required landscaping and screening along SW Grant Avenue. Parking lot landscaping appears to be acceptable except for the interior parking lot islands. An additional island and two trees are required on the east end of the interior parking stalls. In addition, the interior islands do not meet the Architectural Graphic Standards for planting trees based on soil volume and size at maturity, pursuant to Section 18.745.030.C.1, above. Interior parking lot islands dimensions shall be increased to —10'x-30' so that trees have sufficient soil volumes to support substantial canopies. Alternatively, under pavement treatments (such as structural soils) that allow for root growth and provide equivalent soil volumes may be substituted so that parking spaces are not lost. Other landscape islands on ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 14 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER the exterior of the parking lot may be eliminated to compensate for expanded interior islands. Trees in the exterior islands may be shifted back a few feet to the perimeter of the parking lot. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the land use buffering and screening standards have not been met. Provided the recommended conditions of approval or other conditions by the Hearings Officer are imposed, the applicable landscaping and screening standards can be met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall submit a Detailed Buffer Area Landscaping and Screening Plan consistent with the D-3 buffer type and the applicable buffering and screening standards. If the plan varies from the standards, the applicant shall demonstrate how the alternative plan affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by the code. Parking areas, including overhangs, are not allowed within any required buffers. • The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes an additional tree or other vertical shrubbery, spaced appropriately between the two existing ponderosa pine trees and which reconciles the conflict between parking stall depth and required landscaping and screening along SW Grant Avenue. • The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan including an additional island and two trees on the east end of the interior parking stalls. The proposed interior islands shall be sufficient to meet the standards in the Architectural Graphic Standards for planting trees. Off-Street Parking and Loading(18.765) At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. The applicant is not proposing new structures that require additional parking pursuant to Section 18.765.070. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site;The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation; As discussed earlier in this report, this criterion is satisfied. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; The development plans (Sheet A1.00) show the access drive is defined by concrete curbing. This criterion is satisfied. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; The applicant proposes to use the existing access on Tax Lot 1600. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; The applicant has proposed to pave the access and all parking areas. This criterion is satisfied. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 15 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The parking spaces are serviced by two-way access proposed within this project. This criterion is satisfied. Loading/unloading driveways: A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. The proposed accessory parking lot will serve the St. Anthony's School and Church but is not locate on the same site. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant's Site Development Plan shows applicable parking lot striping. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has proposed concrete curbs at the edges of paving adjacent to planting areas in lieu of wheel stops. These are shown on the Site Development Plan provided with the application. However,the landscaped areas provided are 1.5 feet and not the required 3 feet. Therefore, this standard has not been met and has been conditioned to be met. Drainage: Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. The applicant has provided a Storm Drainage Report. The Development Review Engineer has reviewed, approved and conditioned the proposed parking lot drainage in the Streets and Utilities Section of this report. Lighting: A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. The applicant's Lighting diagram (Sheet ELI) shows light level of 0.2 FC at the periphery of the parking lot paved area with the light level rising slightly in the vicinity of Pole #1 in the northwest portion of the site. It is likely that light at the property line on the southwest, northwest and northeast will be significantly less because of the additional 10-foot buffer area and landscaping and screening.This standard is met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Figure 18.765.1. OFF-STREET SURFACE PARKING MATRIX, outlines the required space and aisle dimensions in feet. The applicant has indicated that the parking lot will be striped as shown on the site plan (Sheet A1.00). The applicant's narrative states the proposed design complies with the requirements of Figure 18.765.1 Off-Street Surface Parking Matrix for compact spaces at a 90 degree angle. However, the dimensions for stall depth are shown on the Plan as 15 feet with a 1.5 foot overhang, while the Matrix requires (C) 16.5 feet for a stall depth (no overhang) plus (G) 3 feet for bumper overhang. In addition, the applicant's Plan shows an overall dimension of the module width to be 57 feet including buffer overhang,while the Matrix requires (F) a minimum Module Width (no bumper overhang) of 58 feet. Therefore, this standard is not ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 16 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER met. The applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows compliance with the required space and aisle dimensions in Figure 18.765.1. In addition, Figure 18.765.1, Space and aisle dimensions, allows up to 50% of total spaces to be compact and shall be labeled as such. According to the applicant's Site Development Plan (Sheet A1.0) all spaces in the existing and proposed parking areas are compact. Therefore, this standard is not met. The applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a maximum of 50% of the proposed total parking spaces as compact spaces and marked as such. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. No buildings are proposed. Therefore,no bicycle parking spaces are required. Off-street loading requirements: Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. No buildings are proposed. Therefore, no loading spaces are required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking standards have not been met. Provided the recommended conditions of approval or other conditions by the Hearings Officer are imposed, the applicable off-street parking standards can be met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows compliance with the required space and aisle dimensions in Figure 18.765.1. • The applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that shows a maximum of 50°/o of the proposed total parking spaces as compact space and marked as such. Signs (18.780): Requires that a permit be issued for any sign that is erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered, or relocated within the City Limits. FINDING: The applicant is not proposing signage with this application with the exception of parking and directional signs for which no permit is required. Tree Removal (18.790) Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,streets and parking lots: Retention of less than 25% of existin.g trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 17 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Retention of from 25-.0 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; • Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D; • Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. FINDING: A tree plan was completed as required by CUP 97-00007 for the two large diameter ponderosa pines on the southwestern portion of the site. The tree plan specifies protection measures for during and after construction, and during landscaping activities. In addition, the applicant submitted an arborist report dated April 15, 200 by Raymond Meyer, a Certified Arborist. The report commented on the necessary tree protection for a proosed meandering sidewalk. The sidewalk has since been installed. However, construction of the proposed parking lot will require additional tree protection measures. Therefore, the applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that includes a signature of approval by the project arborist for required tree protection. CONDITION: The applicant shall submit a revised Site Development Plan that includes a signature of approval by the project arborist for required tree protection for the proposed parking lot improvements. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. FINDING: Visual Clearance Area standards apply to the driveway on the proposed site. The applicant has provided a drawing of a visual clearance triangle on the Site Development Plan (Sheet A1.00), consistent with this standard. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810 Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 requires a development to have approved access to a public street. The parking lot expansion will use the existing access to the current parking lot. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any street within the development must be improved in accordance with the TDC. Frontage improvements are already in place. Pavement to 14 feet from centerline of ROW with curb and meandering sidewalk have been constructed. The speed table/crosswalk that was installed does not meet with the City's design standards for a 25-mph street and must be replaced with an appropriately designed structure. The installation of the appropriate structure must be completed before any permits are issued for this project. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a 64 to 128-foot right-of-way width and varied paved section. A 5-lane arterial street is required to have a 52 right-of-way width from centerline. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 18 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER drainage, and street trees. The additional right-of-way along the street frontage has already been dedicated. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15%for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The existing development patterns do not provide an opportunity for a street extension. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. A sidewalk meandered to avoid and save two large ponderosa pines has been constructed along the SW Grant Avenue frontage. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There is no significant upstream drainage to the site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 19 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Required on-site detention is .,.sown on the plans and preliminary ca,culations have been submitted. Expansion of the existing water quality and detention facility is proposed. The existing water quality and detention facility allowed the parking lot to flood to meet detention requirements. Detention on site for the additional impervious area will continue to allow flooding of the parking lot. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No provisions for bicycle or pedestrian facilities are required in this development. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The existing water quality swale will be expanded of meet water quality and detention requirements. A maintenance plan for the Extended Dry Basin proposed is required to ensure that the facility functions as designed over time. The applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall ensure that the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility performs construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made during the project construction and after completion of the construction. The design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Development Engineer with written confirmation that the water quality facility is constructed in compliance with the design and specifications. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a pubhc right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 20 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER There are existing overhead utility lines along the opposite site of Grant Avenue. Fee-in-lieu of undergrounding will be required. It is calculated based on $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 88.11 lineal feet and the fee would be $3,083.85. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. An erosion control plan is required prior to issuance of City permits. C. IMPACT STUDY The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has submitted an impact study,which shows that there will be adequate facilities to serve the proposed accessory parking,as indicated below: Sewer & Storm: No buildings are proposed and therefore no sanitary sewer is required. The applicant proposes storm system improvements to accommodate the increased impervious surfaces as detailed in the applicant's Storm Drainage Report and Plan Set(Sheet C103). Water: The applicant will not need a new water connection and has not proposed to connect the subject parcel to the water system. Parks: Impacts to the park system are not anticipated. The applicant would not be required to pay a parks systems development charge. Transportation: The proposed site is located on SW Grant Avenue, a Neighborhood Street. Through 0previous agreement between the applicant and the City Engineering Department pursuant to MMD2007- 0032, the applicable right-of-way dedication and half-street improvements have been made. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed the proposal and provided comment and recommended conditions as included in findings for the Landscaping and Screening and Tree Removal sections of this report. The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and provided comment that the speed table/raised crosswalk needs to be fixed and is in progress. The City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and commented that the number of accessible parking spaces required is based on total number of spaces provided. Additional accessible ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 21 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER spaces in the existing lot may be required. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal. Findings are included in the Access, Egress and Circulation section and Street and Utility Improvements section of this decision. Requirements are included in the conditions of approval. Full Comments are in the land use file. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has reviewed the proposal and has no comments or concerns. Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and states that the project must obtain a storm connection permit consistent with the CWS Design and Construction standards. According to the CWS Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment for the subject site, no sensitive lands are on or within 200 feet of the site. Full comments are in tf;ie land use file. A October 19,2009 PREPARED ary Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner C__-:411111 , October 19, 2009 REVIEWED BY: Richard H. Be—w7d.rff DATE Planning Managfr ST.ANTHON'S GRANT AVE PRKG EXP. PAGE 22 OF 22 CUP2009-00002 10/26/09 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ,„,,Or. J VICINITY MAP -, ek i, C U P2009-00002 ok St.Anthony's Grant Avenue rr✓,` Parking Lot Expansion o° ,,,a- U. . . Subject Site 25102E11301700 . 51DZB8017D0 /OS4, SOle 2 t,y ._ 11/43 411O Q O �T 0 C. O I !,L St Anthony's ES I I I I Information on this map is for general location a,.....-44(' only and should be verified with the Development „IN f. Services Division. „p Aft Scale 12.390-1 in=199 9 V , Q . Map printed at 19-Oct-09 11:45 AM \\>0 < ST • S. DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE 4 • CONTENT.ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE _ DATA PROVIDED HEREIN THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO DATA FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES IN THE 14 A, (�/c:::l:/� ff �-� \ i INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. V Vl• Y ``\ • // e A City of Tigard SW Hall Blvd ' �R M PS 1 I ( Tigard OR 97223 1\J 503 639-4171 OR II it' f•-� Q J� www.hgard•or.gov /fit �i., f\ \} )I TlG�kd, Z ■ /// `s, X 2 0 i_ y ♦ 5 UNDEVELOPED .qia 3. sf / ;.o. 4' �" ', De i }/0 ♦ �. • Z is �" /a, ♦ 7257 \ ■ • .- //i 01 O\. ■ / b / .. ` ♦ — ax \ \/i % O ° v a�, / m ° zn 8 / C \' md 4 14:\4� y �.c�' ` TAX LOT // / Z O a.® / Q KEY NOTES: 1 6 +` 6 7600 ° 3 ■ Q V NE W / / O I%7',"'"" � �1 '° r° O A �0 SPACES(C). a O ;r;,'O 2 ' • O W Z O mw mew. \\%.'a � \ TEAL-- / Q// , O'^6. / / Z 7 v / D wY ♦ \ !` 11* �a /�r, m Y o I O ... Hw LEGEND: \\ ° /� a I—.5 Z O Ix_ ♦\\ `a TAX LOT °� �/ S /' Z>00< 0 311.0.01 0 .......... ■ \\ .0 N. < vTtr-- ::-.!: t ‘ A.* .A. • row au I "` d AfOQO =IC 1.,.- ♦ /\ iI / // FIELD I Q k fi Q� 0 �//X / /. Onuvnn mx.ttoa \`\'. �.-° \ © 'I. '/ DATE 06-1.9 o /% JOB. 3+��99 O � o< .. \ ��o �e4, %j am oww °. 0 ,!UQ:My ■ / // 04£0..DA '0' moi:avci� `ro /O ,.°°'�'oaiLim.ircw0O"irrn nwe: .,w.�o.. EXIST G CI TWA PARKING • \ SW GRANT wOOO \�/ /�T PARKING LOT p R„a "°°° 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN \ SITE DEV. it PLAN g ran"— / 21 / / CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Al o0 Westlake , I SURVEYING consultants,inc RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2009 CITY OF [R3ARD F!f:�lti�E,�r";ifi GINEERI� G SW Grant Ave. Parking Lot Expansion CUP Submittal August 20, 2009 M r 1-. , t 1. Pacific Corporate Center 97224 WWW. - - I PH I FX ¢ r �� F � � L i 1. SW Grant Ave. Parking Lot Expansion CUP Submittal Prepared for: St. Anthony Church & School 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4179 Prepared by: Westlake Consultants,Inc. 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway, Suite 150 Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone: (503) 684-0652 Fax: (503) 624-0157 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW Summary—Overflow Parking Lot Expansion 0 NARRATIVE- OVERFLOW PARKING LOT EXPANSION 18.330 Conditional Use 1 18.360 Development Review 2 18.370 Variances and Adjustments 5 18.390 Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study 5 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts .5 18.705 Access, Egress,and Circulation 6 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards .6 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 7 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 9 18.780 Signs 9 19.790 Tree Removal 9 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas 10 18.810 Street&Utility Improvement Standards 10 IMPACT STUDY—PARKING LOT EXPANSION Transportation System 11 Drainage 11 Parks 12 Water System 12 Sewer System 12 Noise Impacts 12 Dedication of real Property Interests .13 SW Grant Pkg Lot Expansion CUP - City of Tigard Westlake No. 1095-011 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Contents A Pre-app notes - zoning Pre-app notes - engineering B Deeds C Neighborhood meeting affidavit Neighborhood meeting notes D CWS Service Provider Letter E Prelim Site Distance Certification F Storm Report G Arborist report&tree protection plan H Traffic Evaluation I Right of Way Dedication J Conditional Use Application SW Grant Pkg. Lot Expansion Plan Set • C100 Cover Sheet • C101 General Notes • C102 Demolition &Erosion control Plan • C103 Grading and Storm Drainage Plan • C104 Details Sheet • A1.00 Site Development Plan • A2.00 Existing Conditions • A3.00 Vicinity Map • L1.0 Landscape Plan • L2.0 Landscape Plan • EL1 Lighting Design SW Grant Pkg Lot Expansion CUP - City of Tigard Westlake No. 1095-011 Summary — Overflow Parking Lot Expansion. Conditional Use Permit 97-0007 approved development of accessory parking for the school and church on the front part of Tax Lot 1700 on 12515 SW Grant Ave. and adjacent Tax Lot 1600 on 9870 SW Johnson St. at SW Grant and SW Johnson St. The back part of Tax Lot 1600 was shown undeveloped. Tax Lot 1600 was developed as approved. Development of Tax Lot 1700 was postponed because environmental contaminants were discovered. Minor Modification MMD 2007-00032 modified CUP 97-0007 to extend the period of approval for Tax Lot 1700. The civil engineer has since determined that to accommodate parking lot expansion on Tax Lot 1700, it will be necessary to increase the size of the existing Swale on Tax lot 1700 so that five existing parking spaces must be removed. Since there are 49 existing spaces, and MMD 2007-00032 approved 76 spaces, the church's parking needs would not be met and the cost per parking space would be excessive. The church wishes to develop accessory parking on the Tax Lot 1700 now in order to provide code-required parking during construction of the Ph.1 B Community Center. Therefore, the applicant proposes to modify to the existing CUP to increase the parking area on Tax Lot 1700 by about half the back part of the lot for a total of 86 spaces. Half street improvements which preserve two existing large trees as required by CUP 97-0007 and which have show 25 ft. street width do not require an adjustment Narrative — Overflow Parking Lot Expansion. 18.330 CONDITIONAL USE 18.330.320 Approval Process B. Major modification of approved or existing conditional use. 2. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: a. A change in land use. The City of Tigard has determined that a major modification of an existing conditional use results from a change in land use on the undeveloped part of Lot 1700. Therefore, a Type Ill procedure is required. 18.330.320 Approval Process A. Approval standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use. The site accommodates Off-Street Surface Parking Matrix requirements per Figure 18.765.1 plus a "hammerhead"vehicle turn-around. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering the size, shape, location,topography, and natural features. Screening and buffering, noise, light, and crime are not affected by the proposal for expansion of parking on the undeveloped part of Lot 1700. There appears to be no inherent conflict between parking in an R4.5 zone or with this site in particular except for differing opinions among the neighbors about screening. 3. All public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. The only public facility upon which there will be increased demand is the storm sewer, which the civil engineer determined to be adequate. Water, sanitary, street lighting, public transit, etc. are unaffected by the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposal complies with 18.510 Residential Zoning Requirements. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050. .1-- Section 18.330.050 B. 9. states additional development standards for religious institutions including minimum lot size and setbacks. The combined developed area of Lots 1600 and 1700 exceed the minimum lot size for a religious institution. The proposed development does not include any buildings to which the setback standards for religious institutions apply. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The proposed design complies with the supplementary requirements identified at the pre- application meeting and discussed elsewhere in this narrative, including 18.380 Signs and 18.360 Site Development Review. 18.360 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions,or denying an application: 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment. a. Buildings. The applicant does not propose any buildings. Therefore,this section does not apply. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. There is one large tree on the property line between Lot 1700 and the dedication area, and roots from the neighbor's large tree extend into Lot 1700 and the right-of-way. We were required by CUP 97-00007 to preserve these trees if possible, otherwise to mitigate. Design on Lot 1700 and the right-of-way complies with recommendations in the arborist's report to preserve the trees. These are shown in the landscape drawings. There are no other trees on Lot 1700. c. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: 2 The project site is a featureless lawn. Borings by a geotechnical engineer revealed that the soil is not pervious enough for pervious pavers, and the water level in the rainy season is too high for detention below pervious pavers. To the extent animals nest in the two large trees on the property line and on the neighbor's property, we are preserving them. 3. Exterior elevations: The applicant does not propose any buildings. Therefore, this section does not apply. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: Table 18.745.1 Buffer Matrix states that buffer type D is required for parking lots 50+ spaces. We propose to provide buffer type D-3 with a 6 ft. sight-obscuring fence. This matches the requirement of original CUP 97-0007 except that additionally we propose to locate the sight-obscuring fence 2 ft. from the edge of asphalt in the bermed setback area to protect the neighboring property from headlights. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses. The applicant does not propose multifamily use. Therefore, this section does not apply. 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use The applicant does not propose multifamily use. Therefore,this section does not apply. 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-Loth l■ use. The applicant does not propose multifamily use. Therefore, this section does not apply. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain,the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain.This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Lot 1700 is not within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this section does not apply. 9. Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: The full extent of the parking lot expansion will be visible from SW Grant. The applicant proposes to use the existing driveway and sidewalk across the right-of-way. Some neighbors at the neighborhood meeting expressed concern that the code-required sight-obscuring fence on the west side of the parking lot would block the view of the undeveloped part of Lot 1700. Other neighbors want the fence there for screening from 3 parking. The applicant would be delighted to comply whatever the neighbors, planning department, and hearings officer decide. 10. Crime prevention and safety. Parking lot lighting will be provided. There will be no hidden areas. 11. Public transit. The accessory parking lot will not add any new occupants to the religious institution or otherwise affect public transit. 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. The proposed landscape design complies with the requirements of Chapter 18.745, b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped. There are no open space and recreational area requirements. Therefore, this section does not apply. c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Not including the undeveloped area or the dedicated area in the right-of-way, Lot 1700 is 16,446 sq.ft. The landscaped area is 5,760 sq.ft. The landscaped area is 35% of the gross area which exceeds the minimum code requirement. 13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. Drainage includes a storm water swale for detention and filtration. 14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447. Accessory parking does not include accessible parking spaces. As required by code, they are located adjacent to the building entries in the adjacent R12 zone across SW Grant. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. 4 The proposal complies with 18.510 Residential Zoning Requirements except for a variance requested in this narrative in 18.370 Variances. 18.370 VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS 18.370.010 Variances. C. Approval process and standards. 2. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: The applicant does not request a variance. Therefore, this section does not apply. 18.390 DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES/IMPACT STUDY 18.390.020 Description of Decision-Making Procedures. C. Summary of permits by decision-making procedure type. The City of Tigard has determined that a major modification of an existing conditional use results from a change in land use on the undeveloped part of Lot 1700. Therefore, a Type Ill procedure is required. 18.390.050 Type III Procedure B. Application requirements. e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services.The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. See separate Impact Statement, attached. 18.510 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS' 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts. D. R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 5 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. Table 18.510.1 states that religious institutions are conditional uses in R4.5. The parking lot expansion is accessory parking for a religious institution in the adjacent R12 zone across SW Grant Ave. No buildings are proposed. Table 18.510.1 states no development standards for maximum lot coverage or minimum landscape for R4.5. The proposed undeveloped 7,550 sq.ft. of Lot 1700 would exceed the minimum lot size and minimum lot width requirements fora detached unit lot in zone R4.5 per Table 18.510.2. The proposed parking lot design complies with the setback requirements at the sides and back. 18.705 ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION 18.705.030 General Provisions. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Table 18.705.3 states that for 0-99 parking spaces, the minimum number of driveways required is 1, minimum access width is 30', and minimum pavement is 24' with curbs required. The applicant proposes to use existing code-compliant access to SW Grant Ave. 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 18.725.020 General Provisions. A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use, activity or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining to non-point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter. The proposed use is accessory parking during hours of operation for the church and school. There is an existing chain to close off parking at the driveway if unauthorized use after hours in some way becomes a problem but so far it hasn't. 6 A photometric plan demonstrating that there is no light pollution on the neighboring properties is attached. 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.745.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming(Section 18.760.040.C),and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. When site development review does not apply. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,using the applicable standards in this chapter. C. Site plan requirements. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. 7 1.4:11414 v .i t�.j ��� �je,.N' L Ev � '- _.-..—.> $-�La;- He!•a•ir 1. (• `� ' lt` .•1 18.745.050 Buffering and screening. A. General provisions. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter(Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening,shall be required as specified in the matrix. Table 18.745.1 Buffer Matrix states that buffer type D is required for parking lots 50+ spaces. We propose to provide buffer type D-3 with a 6 ft. sight-obscuring fence. 7. When the use to be screened is downhill from the adjoining zone or use, the prescribed heights of required fences, walls, or landscape screening shall be measured from the actual grade of the adjoining property. In this case, fences and walls may exceed the permitted six foot height at the discretion of the director as a condition of approval. When the grades are so steep so as to make the installation of walls, fences or landscaping to the required height impractical, a detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted for approval. 8 We propose to locate the sight-obscuring fence on the bermed area in the setback 2 ft. from the edge of the asphalt to buffer neighboring property from headlights. 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions. A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. The proposed parking lot expansion will provide uninterrupted parking use for the church as required by Table 18.765.2 during construction of the Ph. 1B Community Center, during which time existing parking adjacent to the church will be temporarily disrupted. The proposed design complies with the requirements of Figure 18.765.1 Off-Street Surface Parking Matrix for compact spaces at a 90 degree angle. 18.780 SIGNS 18.780.060 Permit Exemptions A. Exemptions from permit requirements. The following signs and operations shall not require a sign permit but shall conform to all other applicable regulations of this chapter and the provisions of Subsection B below: 2. Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way,other property or from the air. The applicant proposes three code-compliant freestanding pole-mounted "No Parking" signs which are not oriented or intended to be legible from the right-of-way and are therefore not required to be permitted. 18.790 TREE REMOVAL 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement. A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. There is one large tree on the property line between Lot 1700 and the dedication area, and roots from the neighbor's large tree extend into Lot 1700 and the right-of-way. We were required by CUP 97-00007 to preserve these trees if possible, otherwise to mitigate. Design on Lot 1700 and the right-of-way complies with recommendations in the arborist's report and on the landscape plan to preserve the trees. There are no other trees on Lot 1700. 9 18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS 18.795.040 Computations. B. Non-arterial streets. I. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets,a non- arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right- of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of- way line and measured along such lines. The existing code-compliant visual clearance is unaffected by the proposed development. 18.810 STREET& UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.020 General Provisions. A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and no land use application may be approved unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established in this section and adequate public facilities are available. Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. SW Grant is classified as a Neighborhood Route. Per Table 18.810.1 and Figure 18.810.3, Neighborhood Routes are paved a minimum of 28 wide. The applicant proposes to widen SW Grant to 14 ft. from the center of the road. Electric and storm sewers are available. No other utilities are needed. Street lighting is existing on the other side of SW Grant. It is not affected by the proposed development. The applicant agrees to dedicate land as required at the right-of-way and to build half-street improvements at Lot 1700. Note: Since the Pre-Application Meeting, the Engineering Dept. has determined that additional dedication and half-street improvements on SW Johnson St. by Lot 1600 are not required. 10 Impact Study — Parking Lot Expansion. Transportation system. a. Effect on public facilities. Parking for religious institutions is determined by the number of seats in the main assembly area. The applicant does not propose to increase the number of seats. The applicant also does not propose to add a new driveway entrance. Therefore, the proposed development will not increase traffic. The applicant proposes half street improvement for 25 ft. street width on SW Grant. The applicant also does not propose to add a new driveway entrance. Therefore, the proposed development will not affect traffic including emergency vehicles and bikes. The applicant does not propose to add a bike lane. SW Grant was recently improved on other parcels without a bike lane. It would not be possible to provide a bike lane without removing existing curbs. b. Improvements to meet City standards. The applicant does not propose to add street parking on SW Grant. The applicant proposes half-street improvements at SW Grant including a City standard curb and sidewalk. An adjustment is not requested. The applicant also proposes to replace the existing speed bump across SW Grant for traffic calming with a raised pedestrian crossing. c. Impact minimization. The applicant proposes to add ten compact parking spaces in the parking lot expansion area. This would reduce demand for on-street parking. The applicant proposes to preserve two large Ponderosa pines by extending the landscaped area of the right-of-way and meandering the sidewalk around the trees. This would be a pedestrian amenity. The raised pedestrian crossing would serve the same purpose for traffic calming as the speed bump and also improve pedestrian safety. Drainage. a. Effect on public facilities. The proposed development would replace some pervious areas (lawn) with impervious areas (asphalt parking.) The proposed development will include an enlarged storm water quality treatment and detention swale compliant with Clean Water Services design standards. The proposed development in the right-of-way would replace some pervious areas (lawn) with impervious areas (sidewalk and curb) but otherwise preserve the existing wide landscaped area. b. Improvements to meet City standards. Storm water runoff will be collected at a new catch basin in the parking lot and directed into the enlarged water quality treatment and detention swale. li The proposed development would increase the impervious area of the asphalt on SW Grant by 1 ft. This is the minimum increase in street width permitted by the City. c. Impact minimization. The swale will be improved to reduce storm water detention in the existing parking area as well as provide water quality treatment and detention for the expansion area. The proposed increase in impervious area is the minimum necessary to preserve both Ponderosa pines and provide code-required lanes and a sidewalk and comply with City street standards. Parks. a. Effect on public facilities. The proposed development will not affect the number of occupants on church property and therefore will not affect parks. b. Improvements to meet City standards. No specific requirement to meet a City standard is called for by the Code. The project site is not suitable for development as a park. c. Impact minimization. No impact is anticipated. Water system. a. Effect on public facilities. The proposed development does not connect to the public water system. b. Improvements to meet City standards. Landscaping and Screening section 18.745.030 states that the owner is responsible for maintenance of all landscaping and screening. Since the project site does not have water connection, the owner will water the plants as necessary with a water truck. c. Impact minimization. No impact is anticipated. Sewer system. a. Effect on public facilities. The proposed development is not for a building and will not produce demand for sanitary sewer service. b. Improvements to meet City standards. The proposed development does not propose to connect to the sanitary sewer system. c. Impact minimization. No impact is anticipated. Noise impacts. I2 a. Effect on public facilities. Tigard Noise Ordinance 7.40.170 states that sound shall not be produced that measures 60 dB at the boundary of a noise-sensitive unit (such as a residence) between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., and 75 dB at any other time. The sounds of a car door slamming are 63 dB, car starting 60 dB, car accelerating 55 dB, people shouting/laughing 65 dB, and car idling 61 dB. (Source: Wieland Associates 2002.) The proposed street width adjustment will maintain the existing two lanes and therefore will not have a noise impact. b. Improvements to meet City standards. No improvements to meet City standards are required. c. Impact minimization. The parking lot expansion will be the most remote corner of accessory overflow parking. It will be used only occasionally during church operating hours from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Dedication of real property interests. a. Effect on public facilities. The subject parcel extends about 10 ft. past recently improved properties on SW Grant including the adjacent parcel with contiguous parking on SW Grant and SW Johnson. b. Improvements to meet City standards. The applicant proposes to dedicate right-of-way to 30 ft. from centerline of SW Grant and construct half-street improvements along the subject parcel's frontage. c. Impact minimization. The proposed dedication would correspond to recently improved properties on SW Grant. 13 Exhibit A Pre-app notes — zoning Pre-app notes — engineering C. CY OF TIGARD PRE--APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Not are Valid for Six(6)Months) $ WHIM PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: ...... ___. usrt.. ?t?( ....................... STAFF AT PRE-APP.: GR17t1t ................................ y. .y NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Drew Rocker,_\nkrum \Dusan Architects Phone: (503)...215-7 1110....._............ ........ Phone: - __ PROPER'1'' LOCATION: -\t)I)Rl'.SS c:l,\t•:R \1. 1.0C11.1(1\: 12515 S\\ (;rant _\vc•ttue '1_\_N \i_\I)S: IA)1 ;5 : 2S1021ili(17lt( NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: C_otdlitional._..l:se Permit ((VP), Type III-HO. for acct oI parking cx4)ansiun to an approved Conditional Use: Street Itttliuvem nt Adjustment t\" 1R),"I rpe II. for reductiu )(Irl etnent.section on SW (;rant ,\venue. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: \ccessory parking lot expansion oil I I.I -!►11 and at'eduction_of the street maproVementstandards har_pa\cment width from ?Ii to 24 feet on S\\' (;rant .\venue. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: l.ow Density-Residential ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: It-4.5 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.510) NIINIMt. M I.O'I'SIZE•:: 7,500 seg. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 li. Max. building,height: 30 It. Setbacks: Front: 20 ft. Side: 5 ft. Rear: 15 ft. 0>met': 15 ft. from street. \I.\XIMI MI SITE CO\'I•:R.\(;I.: NA", Minimum landscaped or natural Vegetation area: NA'',). NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout)Tl II: .\P )i.I(:.\NT SHALL NO'I'I1:\' .\1.1. PR()(P1:R-I Y O\x N1:RS WITHIN 30t1 ITET, IN I L:TLSTEE) 1).\R'1 II S, AND TUE CITX...OF TIGARI) PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. .\ minimum of two :2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to he held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The .\PPI I(:•\N'i SHALL St 4i\11 \ \.\RR.\ 11\`I which pros ides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adedu.ateh address criteria w mid he reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. (:fl' ( 11(; \I(t) Pre-■pplkation Conference Nurrs Page I 018 i[HYr3g El IMPACT STUDY (Refer to ""de Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050' As a part of the APPLICA _IN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, 1Aicants are required to INCLUDE, IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system, the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. /1 ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:1. Minimum access width:30'. Minimum pavement width:241.. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas:NA. I I WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. El SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) • STREETS: feet from the centerline of > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: O. A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR)of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and • �t The structure not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities,and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: (Buffer Level "D") 10'-20' feet along northwest boundary. 10'-20' feet along northeast boundary. feet along south boundary. 10'-20' feet along southwest boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: SW Grant Ave frontage. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON•Rcsidcniia1:\pplicalinn/Planning Division Scclion / LANDSCAPING (Refer tc ae Chapters 18.745, 18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-wav boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls,and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1.0 spaces/1.7 seats (min); 1.0 spaces/1.3 seats (max) Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):87 for tax lots 1600 and 1700 combined. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: P. Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. DP Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ▪ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ■ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 17 BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. 1.0 spaces/20 seats CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Resikcnual Application/Planning I)iricion Section ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Rci )Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify gt nsitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES(CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <254%0 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to<50 acres 30 feet I >50 to<100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in <25%slope), ♦ Natural lakes and ponds _ add 35 feet past the top of ravine° 4Starting point for measurement =edge of the defined channel(bankfid flow) for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 'Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. oche vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NOX.Rcsidrnnal Application/Manning Diricion Section u-:,.'..U.n(i iuu,uifi u.:aixatyJitt Er IU''IS Ji ))to r salt,\aat)a.)aµur)tici!lulgdd\•-aid (12.1\-!)Li.ti( .l 1 l ) '(1.09i)•(16 .HI ui)11 ()1 itptc)a)1 13a0uldaa ac{ l(t•,t ram a.uulit told .)a:n :nil Jo um! sV p0u01uaAUi \t )l.I.\`)1'1dd\' .1.1\:'I1 ctc is I.\::1(1 1' (11. )1012[c1 21\'.1.c (1) AN() :1() (lC)l2[:ld :1I I.I. \111.I.1.\\ (I1-I.\Oi\:121 ti:1:121.1. •ttt)llanalstu)a 3.13ju put:liu!.li]p saa.0 iaa10ad O1 J Li.)itdlil: al{7 .tt{ )a5II xi IM\ 131{1 spot11au1 put: sl].ita)uets yu!Cit1ap Luad .td ucnlaalua(I \ pm::pa.()tuna :xi of p:]sc.)tluad 0.1U LIattl:tt x3331 pit)(I )i1Hj!1uapl `Lk.)gt:.`iuttu 0u S1.001):0.1ad411:3 to xa'I '!Z 1 .la.u)'. I I `,iurlsix<)10 3a1V)aV ua<,„c_ 1.) 0iil:utt i) t :'(i't1911.1 16;_H J uc)1.1))S I Jt':ip!tt1 act pa.tr,ul3.t a(1 01 x3).0 aq1 10 0,0(),C; nap sJ.IMI).]a .1.1(11K3 01 sat{aut I aa.u) s0,),II liurlsIX0 10:, t 01()c urc).)I 10 .�liuulr102{ ...(1.090-06L.8 uon:)a5 01 yulpaoaal. p v3-illnu a9 I OUtaa xi 01 .aa.n aril 0 spaltil 0: 1 11:11 saan3baa .l d!1i a to Salpui I aOAO sa.1.tl ■iuustX) 10 ■,,)Oc 01 cZ w01:)JO alit urt;):121 `saa-t1 10 ;x'i 1:)u 011 JO In IL(1 t JC i"8 I uollaas 01 <itttp.tc):r)1; tut;alit)xd uonr.8rtntl c s,)an]311 "iadilea ui sa1laul 4 j aa.tu saaal iiti11S1Y3 10 „c� tICtp ssal 10 ayi:urt:l•121 :s1oi 13\111.n',tl pm! sl:la,tls `yultit asptn:l a01 stlotslauad .)t]c)a IL)tudr)I.)n:)p .131110 paau]ha.l sa0.11 {r) a:tisnlaxa 1({ IlI'tls pm sp.n'I)u1;is litrl.uo1101 31I1 01 V0111103:)1: (1•t)9tl-06 8{. uc)naac •to sous{.)piny IL1)ui).)VI(I)., 3111 :nO1Ic)1 1x11111 u0nt: lllil\ .3,)(Irp:a Lit sat.laut (71 aa.►o {t:Anitl)a aa11 ,)1ear1rttl .FC) saJ.11 ;urlxlxa ):1I:s 01 lut:"r t)at t; 1c, (14IIVal{ilu.apl 4 .11.11 rin:asliuyls st: palt:u;irsap s.-mat liulpnlaul ,:):111 liurlsix0 ip: 1i, sar:)aclx pill: •u011t:a0i ai{1 Io uc)n1::11111['.){){ 4 :y11r"tt<)Il()_1 ''tl1 :`IC[:l'[.)\[ 1 i\ i IS \\'ld :1;121.1. :111.1. •'1nupufi{ s10<3itta"11131)?21 111;(c( 0411.i. Jt,) a1.11 ur sum)! lII ;x:),11.11)\' 'I`MISS( (1 l'.:.I \_I21::iI1,\\ 'I\ \t)i\321 2I I\ ) (I 12121" H UUld "I \OLI.: J Ll.t)2lcl p01g st 3x11 Iuuo►Jipuna .u, •rtlatud01.1.op pautitIL ital,r.)a 1[latuclola:\.1a .fn• 'U()t111.n;c[ u0laupclll; Ii at)1 I1( 1IlIJ l(Idli u.lauulo{)t 1) I' limp .14)1 sp.).11.Iii 10 S101.10 111 1 119uu). 10 laau d `101 aut:aoj I).1pl.u,.icl at1 i{tt{s l.i.10(tal; 1 IP:I a l: •ig pa1lu1atd :1:12[.I. .IO N( )I.1..):1.I.O2lcl (INV'1\-:\OI\:121 '.)\L1 ti\'1d :1111. 2I()•I \\"Id !1...111.1. \ (laved aatlaaajtioa uoitl'arlddl•-a.rci anoA to papnlaul tclnopur•Ij sluatuaarfha2l uric] 333I,,, 3111 puts :YOCO'06L'8T uotlaaS 3p03 01 a31311) S.I.1∎1 Kg2IIl1b12I NV'Id "IdAOI1i32i 1;I2I.I �` •.1ta1.\AI s ac).1:]a.it(I.101 I]•)I1) a(1 i tti t1oi)rai)))d\' ti 1(1:1:)A,{ •130:) tI Ic t; '.4•)A11t Lu.)31\- •uotluattddt A\m.ta.! tuatudul.)tap ii 10 1.1ll&1 st: 13:1\:1\+.].f .l Iusudoad .1111 11 p:l1litu.I.1d 3c1 u:to ;p.n:1)utas .)per) ii">'11t{yrati a0 I::).il• uliis It:u01111 I)\ •l:.)nt),a 00(111 )I(1t:{it:.tl: Si mopuiii „S:1ttil.la(I I.1■14..; 101 s.1ullJpillI)„ \' 0!:) .)Ill II! \')IS .' \\ I( \Ol.IV 'l1".L�\I ( .I. 2It)121c1 C1:1\l\,1.€LO :IfI Lti.11\ I11\2[.ld N!)IS (08L'81431d1311D 310:)0) a ija?i) SNJIS •p.).nnl).l.1 loo sl.13113 i aaplv,.1cl .131.)1as \\•) 1:■11th:Ix.101101 V Jntixi ups lxittu 5:\\:)'stoat; _ J.1411 L-is ,ti .1.111 0.1x1) li 'SluJt1ItlilI)0a gait: .1.%!3!.:411.3s )v)I S\\J til! \ . dx10) 01 1a :•%aaau Stiopgnso:.) i .1.1l3u0 (1\ (pry\ 3,1101 Avutaici aal.uas ti.\\:) V tlll:Jg0 lsilut itiu.mcIde asn puui Mil;JO \'.LLI1' I.1 O.I. 2lO12k.t 301'10 JOp3(atd 3ai.uas �1 ) •nut]litr91a:i p a 10 tIULlltl.nxtlt):1 1111 :101 p)Sit act 0.1 IJJaU I .itie 10 laud u aq 1c)u Ipu1x pU1 'lar..Il :ne.tud:)s V tit I)-)t11t:1uua 0c{ )tugs 301313a0a `110i'l:tlp(It3s a sl1 tlan dnlx3au.t�c) 0)l JIlt as .101 p.?ptt]ltl! s10I .10 s i':I )21\ (1 "l"1>11.11.11V S.:C1.\'t?i:) i I:)ll L\\ .I.N,-;11\(.1( 12t :Joplin°patt'.la.eS:)\ 10 trorlt:atr t vu)prrl)!S rmprupwo•)purl n0 i,.)(I .S:,li. ) :f1 ru.a,ip.)/)U)cr,f •.tr)p1.130:) pa1t:1J iaA 4111 .u1 1.111 u,i,a:)1c)acl 111{till) 3111;At .191 L[tU.11 13tLI13p -1St.ltt•)t�II I t{all{.\1 p+1111EELFad )tl Ip't{c S:f[ll lrl:)l; .uaq.c) an `pi!1 .Ella; 10 �Ii'.t.rali:lti t[il; 1l► litrtdttll3p `Slt:altll:)1I:) 10 [l))Itl'' kit 'ill.% l'I `>1rJp.t1; • :)1)i.mi.m. Ii')tl,]n.ilstr `1u.)utcloia.tap )\ -361 ,),")11:1:31€5 J[il Li!.-4101:)I:IIs')21 El MITIGATION (Refer to C Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: I The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city,either public property or, with the consent of the owner,private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may,with the consent of the Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. Ej CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. n ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) nIINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ® 18.330(Conditional Use) n 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) I I 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street ParkinglLoading Requirements) ID 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) n 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ® 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) VI 18.780(signs) El 18.370(variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map textAmendments) n 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) El 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) M 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Proceduresr7mpact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) I I 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 0 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) E 18.810(Street&Utility improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic overlay) I1 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) • 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping A screening Standards) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ID 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid waste/Reryding Storage) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OP "OMMENTS: Section 18.330.020.B.2.a states that a major modification of an existing conditional use results from a change in land use.The subject Tax Lot 1700 is currently vacant land. The proposed use is for accessory parking.Therefore,a change in land use is proposed requiring a new conditional use permit. CUP97-00007 proposed parking lot improvements on Tax Lot 1600 and a portion of Tax Lot 1700. The validity of the permit was extended a year because of complications with the DEQ permit. Ultimately, the applicant only constructed the Tax Lot 1600 improvements,loosing the vesting of the permit on Tax Lot 1700. MMD2007-00032 approved right-of-way improvements to SW Grant Ave with conditions of approval requiring a public facilities improvement permit for dedication of right-of-way and half street improvements, in particular providing for preserving existing trees with a sidewalk meander and allowing a mid-block pedestrian crossing. The decision may be expired as of May 8, 2009 (18 months) unless a PFI permit has been obtained. The reduced SW Grant Ave street width (28 to 24 feet) requires a street improvement adjustment. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/s" x 11". One.81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard City Council. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning;l)irision Section proposed. Additionally, with regard to Suodivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to appJy those system development credits to the first building Tpermit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER Al HE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Gary Pagenstecher.Associate Planner g^) 4s-r✓ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2434 EMAIL: garyp©tigard-or.gov TITLE 14(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 16-May-08 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NUN-Residential Application/Planning bi■ision Section PRE-APICATION CONFERENCE IIIES :_a a . 11 ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q ���` �' City of Tigard,Oregon Community(Development 11 Shaping (Better Community BLIC FACILITIES Tax Mauls]: 2S102BB Tax Lousl: 1600 a 1100 Use Type: CUP The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Grant Avenue to 54 feet (27 feet from centerline) - Provide radius at corner • SW Johnson Street to 54 feet (27 feet from centerline) ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: • Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Grant Avenue, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline El concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: IF TIGARD Pre-application Conference Notes Pagel of 1! ring Qear1mcnI Section El Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Johnson Street, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ _ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of I sting Department Section ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: AN proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Motes Page 3 of ering Department Sectlo n drainage plan for the site and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will ommodate runoff from upstream p erties when fully developed. Provide on-site detention. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality must be in compliance with Clean Water Services standards. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) Provide preliminary sight distance certification for proposed driveway with application. 1....IFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIE is greater than $5,000.00. Pay the T1F (soon to be the TOT). IF TICARD Pre-Appticadon Conference Myles Page 4 of 5 :ring Department Section BRITS • Public Facility Improvement (F , Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. 'OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of eering Department Sactton GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: � y� �'`!° to • 2 ' O ci ENGINEERING DEPAR ENT STAFF DATE Phone: (5031 639-4171 Fax: [5031 624-0152 slot Revised: September 2.2003 ---t OF TIGARD Pre-AAutieation Conference Notes Page r et E :ono Det:arimentSection Exhibit B Deeds ,aAM N.,413 WARAANIY pElp t :a.1,,w ry., 4,.tk nn, .s 01).11 KNOW ALL MEN Al THESE PRESENTS, That ate.,.. Walt:Ir.r1, Weber. .And W 7.1>✓ronca..d....W.eb.:.r,..1shaad..and..wi.[: . ..... .. . . ' -- - . ...... ar u,aHer called the pl/txlt> in consideration of Ten and no/ o a grantor, ,l !'Aa no/100.x.. 1 �° t nnd..ethev good .an:', valuable constdart tiers . .. . ... . . ti� -' ',.• ,r to grantor paid by. .1;c"+'»t�c.c+su o.0 P.Or:tiand..i.n..[„t•agoc ,i\ tt tiW ........... . .... .... ...... . ., hereinafter celled the grantee, i r' •' t Jors hereby grant, bargain, sell and convoy unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs and assigns, that I ii.- -"'' certain reel property, with the tenements,hereditnmonta end appurtenances thereunto belonging or tipper- I' Iars1:1,14rsThV 4 irtrmiar ouit mining,situated hi the State of Oregon and the county therein named below,described as follows, to•wit: Ii i .5 lI - A part of 1 a ).9, Amended plat of Worth Tigardv1.11u Addition, in ' Washington Coarty, Oregon, more particularly described an follows: 1 plirtnl:riiu' Beginning at the most easterly corner of said lot 19; thence north- t 4-' westerly along the northeasterly lire. or ;:aid lot, 175 feet, more or Less, to the northeasterly corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Clifford M. Meyer, at ux, by deed recorded ! 1.'' :,s 1, May A, 195.1, in deed book 320 page 2t�, th..nce scuther).y, along the r •'4 southeasterly line of said Meyer tract trr t~a soathoact corner Ipa',:11lCi:vrr, 1viu:acttea,a1Mt thereof, said point bu;.ng en the div;ri ng line between lots 16 and 1.9 (per;:;j}} of said addition; thence southeasterly along the said dividing line - between ss d lots 13 and 19, to the southeasterly corner of said bo;u'or ivei lot 19; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said lot 19, - � 1 to the place of beginning. 't; i ,.,1, Pr),�t,oi=ti tr ,y I) 0 To Have and to Hold the above described and granted premises unto the said grantee and grantee's !' heirs and assigns forever. And said grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee and grantee's heirs and assigns, that —^• grantor is lawfully seised in fee simple of the above granted promises, free from all encumbrances ...except.ina r.gtta. o} t<hd 32t11:1ic In and to any portion t'..a not lying Vit11i,11..the...1-Mindaries of roads and highways, . .. rrnn V' ,4, _.......' .......... and that grantor will and N 1 grantor's heirs, executors and administrators shall warrant and forever defend the above granted premises V 1 and every part and parcel thereat against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. In construing this deed and where the context so requires,the singular includes the j1ural. WITNESS grantor's hand and seal this . . .. ...day of gust ;i..;1... , 19 6..3.. n 4"--'/t 4,-7 . 7,0 'Ll' ,r+?'?,.....,r-,(3uvi,) 4 •ti:.!-✓' •t'.. '. , lr ".,_ :t..4G 4........... . .(S.At) (SEAL) . ... .. (SEAL) TORS 93.4905 STATE OF OREGON,County of . )se. August .. 0-1.� ....., 19 63. I Personally appeared the above named. Walter N. Weller ..mns!....Fiorence...1....-'.teber, ' 1• .huaband...arat..xtife ' .And acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be. .. .their......voluntary net and deed. } Before me: r� , G `:. . .�pKilllaZleI ....ti X'+!214- ,,i�................ . . .'' •' 1 Notary public for Oregon . 1�n (Sw.) My commission expires JI1 AA' ef..9, ./9 6 t`+� I r _ WARRANTY DEED 1V STATE OF OREGON. . d N 4 N D E Cony of wo.t 1&!ai t ,WALttar.N Yhakgr,...01.4x ' 4: v TO t.Ilgin Theta.39n,t:auq,T•Curt.and E.oln,, R.evader of Conv+Yana.Lit wt�jetmtY.do h+r.br 6 ,t D .i rnon.T o•0'H.. cvrtIII IEi„ the within Instrument,bit wallop war Arc.t.td . .Cego..0....A.gr.t1,1trc1...... 3r.iCC.nrsrnvrn Lmk, . iI in Oregon. ...Mod tine tocordlt In • ran n.conu...a '+1 �a! h.rl W coo H. 10 alit Mown!,of __.�T-ATM•+ Ir ur.w.trn. of .ate`ceuniY• . r. ASTCR ricconomo RETURN TO uero.. ti With... My t;M.4 ono;ref'rdRS:d. t (jOCI1,NCOMS5tN.County ..�. ti Archdiocese of Portland fir • in Oregon, ` A .i 3/0 St. Pnthonyts Parish, ---��"" s —ravtr — e, Tigard, Orernn. A U 1 09 ., r SEP 6 8 3� 11M '63 (/ V rl' 495 ra:'. 4 i CITY OF TI ARD Ft�lNflU:15;,/ENr;,I"vc_ERING 513 5cj 612647 T ,ArtO Cj- Washington County,°talon 2002-141586 1112212002 03:20:28 PM 6 � -\ A_ o•ow C •1 ca °:r NHn , l - Tra �snation 1,0.00 tdlOO S11.00 seo.00-T Otu°Statoo a b After ReCOrding, Return to I4IIII1111111111111111111111 IIIllllll�lull\l �- The Archdiocese of Portland naz08 8882002014 80020028 lwrylium.,Ouutor of Ma samosa trod Taxation ' 2838 E. Burnside Street ewe r-OR:cI°Cotrnty Cunt tor WuidnolonCo% .®i, do nano WON the Ott wi4tin WI wnanl.)wruln0 2t •prl Portland, OR 97214-1895 vtd r.c,It.d.nd osesd.d in Oa.b9 of scorch of {pC, • t odd cof+nty. �,�pr,7.V0`n �''d '' ._._J Until a change is requested, tax statements J.rry0.Man.o EaiOMco Cow,tyC a and Tuition. . shall be sent to the following addreaas same as above --- ------- ya CA vJ-t 1 tliToFS LtlwTY-yi STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED �'t, -+•`,•- f` ,,'.`• 1!siF. (Individual) I ____��_ _: .... .. (Abovo Cpace Reser•ted for Recorder's Use) ,`` Katalin Ratkai y conveys and warrants to 0 'J1 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and successors, a corporation sole for N the benefit of St. Anthony Church n, the following described real property in the State of Oregon and County of Washington 'V free of encumbrances, except an specifically set forth hareina z U 'beginning at the moat Northerly corner of Lot 18, NORTH TIGARDVILLE ADDITION, in in the (/1 O City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, running thence South 35°59' West ,/ t i.. 71.52 feet to an iron pipe) thence South 54.40' East 309.75 feet to an iron pipes thence tNA 2 z continuing South 54°40' East 20 feet to the center of Grant Streets thence North 39.53' NI ig East along the center line of Grant Street 88.11 feet; thence North 57°40u West 20 feet to an iron pipe; thence continuing North 57.40" West 316.46 feet to an iron pipe at the most Fi Northerly corner of said Lot 18, NORTH TIa7ARDVILLE ADDITION. U. O Tax Account Number(s) : 8463233 ---- This property is free of encumbrances, EXCEPT: Covenants, conditions, restrictions, rights of way, easements and reservations now of record. ```!-), The true consideration for this conveyance is $80,000.00 M THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT AGLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN 'THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLA- TION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRU• Ni MENU, THE PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVEI? USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAW- SUITS AGAINST E'ARMXNG OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. DATED this r"d,O..1" day of November, 2002. I11AL ( -� _ �` Katalin Ratkai CV STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF Washington)ss. --7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this L- ) day of November, 2002, by • Katalin Ratkai. 4-" �• "41,.. OFFICIAL.SEAL Notary Public for Oregon q`.�•./ , £ ,•, to t.HU MAN My Commission Expires: ,L ` C--W' ...�1r NO ARY PU N MO.363808 1.^•'� CCI'..1FSISSfOt�'•MO.503808 MYCOMMISSKIN.2'0,1355tau5,2048 Order No, , 2239091w INDKNNITY/AH['IDAVIT (Continund) (LLonn, Poneeeaion and Improvements) Legal Description (Continued) Order No.t 2239091w 39°53' Enet along the center lino of Grant Street 88.11 foot, thonco North 57°40" Went 20 feet to an iron pipe, thence continuing North 57°40" West 316.46 feat to an iron pipo at tho moot Northerly corner of acid t,ot 18, NORTH TIOARDVILLE ADDITION. N 0 N 11111111111111!1i11111111111 2662-141586 S Exhibit C Neighborhood meeting affidavit g g Neighborhood meeting notes AFFIAVIT OF MAILING/P TING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF TI IE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE.fTO-TIE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division • 13)25 SW Hall Boulevard • r. '• • Tigard, OR:'97223-81$9• . IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: // I,- +v � � , being duly sworn,depose and say that on the to day of__/q-prt I 200gj ,I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at n e a r) 614.) tiicK4NLI L S'9 T� ma g 722 3 ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 7t3404.1 r gvi- with postage prepaid thereon. V ji1444,-) Signature (In the presence a otary Public) POSTING: I,_F 12-A/1) kiJ ,do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for GkrKS iuji-rxr 4 44 I NNA) affecting the land located at(state the approximate location(s)) IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s) currently registered) 990f' S to Mc £it/21 f STS. �`t,4Y!/, 9 72 ,and did on the 6 day o a p,- l ,2012 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 7,9 pc-- 3 k�_ land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. • The sign was posted at I cross S-Trt- -T -C-Ytl dux re-k, Q P 11 Q t E/tJif��lc� - J kit - (state location)uu posted notice on property) Signature (In the prese of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF O re t)v- ) County of 1IV�s�r.�5,fvt-1 ) ss. 7 Ae4f)LAft Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the J i'I day of , r .� OFFiCU1L 3F.AI Y,. JEAP4ErTEMAYGENT NOTARY PUBtJCflEGON J -0 - � COMMISSION N0.X39859 r i r 1 , ��ll 1 my COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 7,2019 1 t taii `►TARY PUBLIC OF • •N Commission Expires: is\curptn\masters\neighborhood meetings\aUidavi[of mailio,.posting neighboi ood meningdoc Page 5 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING April 6,2009 R E: Parking Lot addition and street adjustment Dear Interested Party: St. Anthony Catholic Church, Tigard, Oregon is the owner of the property located at SW Grant Street across from St. Anthony Catholic Church, a lot that is fenced. We are considering proposing a conditional use of Parking lot addition and street adjustment at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You ara invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, April 22,2009 in UPPER ROOM 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminavy plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-639-4179 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 71) Fr. Leslie Sieg, Pastor In IIIMI 1111 • ri-_-=r iiir ( 4:1: MEADOw ST 4 M_Im■.0.` '.4'.., '-\ ri s.' ''Z".'..... FAIIIII k ... ler, is • 0 VICINITY MAP _Fowler MS .1" .Ti I I 1 -....,.,...,„ ...::, -..- I . . !.11/..1.4 --` L • -..--4-. r--s. / / ''''- ' ''..'-', . ••;Z* , wooden!Park p 3 7_____ / / . _ ri■-• - .."--...4° -7, -S4*--, Re: R463233/R463224 III , -----. I / 4._ . A -__-___,. / ,---__ :::":'-' -`)------. • -b---''--...:-,-., (Labels are valid for 3 -...7,-,:—..„. a --...::--•;''' .1—, ' -: -- .1',. months from the date + i --7 .',4 4'4,:. :::-..1.1,1=4,...M.,..g.: • It.......r, •••_, I - printed on this map) 1,,,° irrir Clydesdale ..e- •.. .":,'4"9121ffliffl it '-- • ' '' ... ' :Elet.- ---i, .- • •:=-:-.. ....0 . / r- A,- la , A 401, .;-;;;;;;;;;471-7:÷-4.-!..v..?1:#:--•". ...."- ' : '----: J''' 7---;-1--.4:::-STI LIT......- 610 !:-.7 lr ....d •-_,-_-.......:1---.7-5_i_E-_--lw.J ....-.0-rf.111.-..t.n..,:„....-i.. ,.44. , . , .,,::::::_....--.......91.1r i'iip•iiiiiiii.-::::::::::',iii.. ir ' • -,, i t IIII .1411111 o' Ef.-I-- ii. 0 ' ' -41401..tiir- -\.., - . ris..41: ..... -...., , IIII Subject Ske ,, . ;1411....:-:',413il'-°-i'.11:-. ."ITILLT4T CC Al* (1 UM -,i.811=Halil:liEF'-'-:—'±-::F.-=:17171+:4-Pfiiillig;......4'. ME a .1.:x JOHNSON ST ariliPrat.14 4W,,10.2i .7.'-,4747A4iii, /. .1-':"........,.. . ........n- ',.....:::::::-.:'... 44,''',:.. . . ....E. riiig 111.111' 6:9.4111r.4:4177 .;:..."447 ''It'illl'.4ii.:44-77":*''... .:;;111111:.. " litil:P:W .;1174.irm"...-"71..i.ill:""iF.Ilti '-', ‘ °(41 'EH.= 1 .-'.',:.;:"' 414 i.: .,.aiii/Iligil:277,....Z'51P2'..!;.1.41,14 lir I ir . ilk 0 . .7.•!!;(4-zit. "0.- .),' . . ::: 4,-.'.,--‹ ::::::::::::::.. ..... . 46%,:ztEr.:.............-;:,...... ..- . - .... .. _ .. :: a - / ------.....--- ..-..---..-.--..---....-.. ......_...==::: ..._. ..., , / Ar N• *tit 1------, A. HI)..4%1+.,. E';'11b ' o ' ..''NE:'*-4434'.-4 ...N ..i1T-ffb_Ebb... 01-4TE!!'. ''':'' .._#,:, n-.- • •. i 4. ----- 1r,::::::: ,74, :: 44.--,-4 ...xikiT.:.-9lritang5i,,i,, 'i.,- ••!,:::' , / C• ..,ii.: . ..:■.......,.......!St.Atatlo nyis E S:-..4, — • e OrA .10° .1i .i'. • ,. . !foto Es fates 4% ":....--..F.4,::::. — LI-- Aler,... :::::::EZ-11111112'll." :-.E--;, ..///"/ ' s 0" .7.:1,2:.- „. `°- -;;"--";:- .:.. iii:::::;:"it Irrfftlialt:„:71g. ---- - ........,_,H.,, .......:::: - .....„.. ......„...::,...:.....,,..........., ,...../ ..:„...,.0„,„..:.:,,, ,... ............ ............. ..,.. T„,...,_, ___ ._-.... ...... . . v' ' '..•. '.. ,•','- '- V ii. , -%.. ...::: : ,,. , / / .. •...r.:::.... . .-..... Miormation on this mita tor general location 44111‘ 41.' , 44---/ , ....,... .- , - i 411.' 4t„ . ... 7 -,.., ... _,_,....--4,,, only and shatdd be verl with the Development / 410, ,'.• ' - ;-t,..4... ! ..j'....•,: ' <'...-„,... .„,..;:,' ' 1 ' ''- ': ''''.- , — . . .\' i 1..,-,.....;..,'" ----'----3 Services Division. Scale 1:5251-1 in=438 it --" i IIII 1111111147 N„,\AppS1101, ii19,91..GI fES,):::.. 1111 . , ,,,• 40-,.///r/ -'' .Ire r--'-'-'3 ' ' . Map printed at 03-Apr-09 02:31 PM DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES TIE CITY OF TIGARD / . ''' , ' ‘ :. .,: ....1 --1 . '.,... '.'.. AANVEN rA ttE:CY,7441".E.LIFI.:E°"$IP LD REe:559:0:Lrl YTOLFE . LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF MOW CAUSE() . . - • . ' - ' '' - , ' .... . ...,".... 1 C . '... ''. ,''' ' . . „ City ot Tigard fl 111.4111114 ,,.. , , A,... ...., . .„ , . 13125 SW Hal Blvd ,r4 RilliAli) Tigard,OR 97223 III . -• . www.figard-or.gov TIGAAD n /\ . - .4, ....-.:\ -- . • go d 751AT ct 4 // c CTL-cbts 1/ al J o ff' fLAKE1,1- .444- /Wc6.6.e.4-7 Comments and Questions from Neighborhood Meeting April 22, 2009 1. The height of the fence should be from the raised height of the parking lot. 2. Will the parking lot be gated when not in use? 3. Will there be lighting in the parking lot? 4. A concern was raised about safety and crime. The person believed that the parking lot with a fence would provide screening to potential criminals. 5. A persons felt that the landscaping and fencing should not cut off the view to the back of the undeveloped lot from the street. 6. How many feet will the parking lot be raised at the rear of the parking lot? 7. Will drainage problems in the rear undeveloped lot be increased? 8. If we prefer landscaping at the rear of the parking lot as opposed to a fence, when can we suggest this? 9. How would a fire truck get to the undeveloped lot? 10. Can you take out the split rail fence so that we can back out of our driveway by using your adjacent property? 11. Will there be a home built on the remaining undeveloped lot? Exhibit D CWS Service Provider Letter 06/09/2009 15:25 503624E WESTLAKE CONSUL TS PAGE 02/04 JUN 0 9 2009 Clean Water Services File Number Cle.'r Wate Services 0 9 - Ott a 2-`4 1 By---- ensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 1. Jurisdiction:City of Tigard 2- Property Information(example 1S234ABO1400) 3. Owner Information Tax tot ID(a):02S1 02BB IL 1600& 1700 Name:Father Leslie Sieg Company:St.Anthony's in Tigard Address:9905 SW McKenzie Street Site Address: 12515 SW Grant Avenue city,State,Zip:Tigard,Oregon 97223 City,State,zip:Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone/Fax: Nearest Cross Street; SW Grant Ave& SW Johnson St. E-Mail: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Michelle Jariabka, P.E. ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company:Westlake Consultants, Inc. p Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway,#150 Q Residential Subdivision 01 Commercial Subdivision City, State,Zip:Tigard, OR 57224 C] Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial Other Parking Lot Expansion Phone/Fax: 503-68406520 E-Mall:mjariabka @westlakeconsultants.com C. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes Ei No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project This is an expansion of an existing parking lot. This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as Issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this Information is true,complete,and accurate, Print/Type Name Mic��hellle�e;;Jariabka, P.E. Print/Type Title Project Engineer Signature Date June 9, 2009 FOR DISTRICT USE •1111/ 0 Sensitive areas potentially'exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report [may also be required. Based on review of the submitted materials and best available Information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law.fag-a earret NEAPS Tp bE e)Pe_A 01 Based on review of the submitted materials and best available Information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This SensitiveArea Prescreening She Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07.20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must he obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. This Service Provider Letter Is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. [�The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or The lot was plaited after 919195 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER TIER IS REQUIRED. lS�� Reviewed by A. �� Date 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillshow.Oregon 97123 Phone:r503)CE1-9100 • leix:(5(13)cg1-44:39 • www.rleaivdatemerviccs.orrt Exhibit E Prelim Site Distance Certification Westlake , 'ax'' � PIANNIPIG I EPJCiIN @EHiR7G SUR'Jf% ( f • We , ��t.> consultants,inc PRELIMINARY Intersection 4 �3 , Sight Distance Certification June 10, 2009 "04, 1 . City of Tigard :3-11e 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 va:. RE: St. Anthony's Church — Parking Lot Expansion r`�- t .= � 4,"g Preliminary Sight Distance Certification ' The existing access to the parking lot will be utilized for the proposed parking lot 4 r expansion. It is located on SW Grant Avenue. The speed limit along SW Grant Ave. is 25 M.P.H., based upon the posted speed limit requiring 250 feet of sight distance in both directions in accord with Washington County Code Section 501-8.5.F(4), as adopted as a guideline for the City of Tigard. As required by code Sections 501-8.5-F(3)(a) and 501-8.5-F(3)(b), sight distance from the access to SW Grant Avenue was measured to be 140 feet to the northeast to a four way stop sign controlled intersection and in excess of 350 feet in the other direction. On-coming traffic from this southwest direction crosses two traffic calming speed x> bumps. In addition, to account for an existing large tree, the street section to the southeast has been narrowed. In order to see beyond this existing tree the driver will need to pull out just past the entrance. These Code sections respectively require that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road; and assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of pavement to the front `rt of a stopped vehicle. (Actual measurement is taken 15 feet from the pavement edge.) f rw In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance is available at the ra: proposed access for St. Anthony's Parking Lot. Sight distance conforms to the v" requirements as set forth in the Washington County Community Development Code as adopted as a guideline for the City of Tigard. • _ v€. Michelle L Jar'.•ka, P.E. HAADMIN\I09511.071St Anthony's Community Church\Engin\1095110PreSightDistance.doc Pacific Corporate Center 15115 sw sequoia parkway, suite 150, tigard, Oregon 97224 www.westtak.econsult:ants.cam I PH El113,88,t !!1i';.' I FX C1':; 1,24 Exhibit F Storm Report Westlake 1 , consultants,inc ■ Storm Drainage Report SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion For St. Anthony's School & Church Tigard, Oregon iy"D PRop. ac' G I N EF�Q O Z g' 15 ORE t_i 'i� ,. C EXPIRES://460/ / March 19, 2009 For Ankrom Moisan Architects RECEIVED (WCI Project Number 1095-11) �.. AUG 1 4 2009 FL�NN(f n�TI �,FD CrrY / NC, ._ERIr: . Pacific Corporate Center 97224 www. 1 PH 13.604.0652 I FX 503.624.0157 SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.0 WATER QUALITY 3.0 DETENTION 3.1 Pre-Developed Conditions 3.2 Developed Conditions 3.3 Pond Flow Summary 3.4 Orifice Summary 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1 Soils Map and Data 4.2 Water Quality Orifice Calculation 4.3 Hydrographs and Detention Calculations 4.4 Conveyance SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The project location is within the city of Tigard and is located at the southwest corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Ave. The proposed development is an expansion of the existing parking lot that was constructed in 2001. The existing water quality and detention pond will be augmented to account for the new parking lot area. The combined water quality and detention facility is located in the current northeast corner of the property. The detention and water quality facility will be designed according to the requirements set forth in Clean Water Services "Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management", June 2007. The outfall from this facility will be reconstructed while maintaining the existing connection to the public system. Since there are known drainage concerns for Fanno creek onsite detention will be provided. The purpose of this document is to provide calculations and narrative to demonstrate storm water runoff from this new development will be cleaned and detained, per the above stated provisions The existing parking lot and expansion area is approximately 0.85 acres. The existing parking lot drains to an onsite catch basin that is centrally located within the lot. The expansion area is an open grassy space that generally slopes from the south to the north. The expansion area will be drained to a low point, Where a new catch basin will be placed to collect and convey water to the augmented water quality and detention facility. The existing pond on-site is used for water quality. Currently detention is provided, however it is accomplished by allowing the parking lot to flood. Several options have been reviewed in an attempt to eliminate the parking lot flooding. These options include the addition of a pond, which would adversely affect the existing trees and adding buried pipe which is not cost effective. The solution decided on is to expand the existing pond to achieve the required water quality and detention volumes for the site. The parking lot will continue to flood with an attempt to minimize this depth to lower than what it was designed to. With the proposed modifications, calculations show the parking lot will flood approximately 5 to 6 inches during the 25 year storm event. 2.0 WATER QUALITY An Extended Dry Basin will be constructed to achieve water quality and detention. For water quality, the system shall treat the total precipitation of 0.36 inches falling in 4 hours with a storm return period of 96 hours. The water quality volume is 782 cf. The draw down time for the water quality volume in an extended dry basin in 48 hours, therefore the maximum flow (Q) out of the basin is 0.0045 cfs. Impervious Area: Total Impervious = 26,059 sf Water Quality Flow (WQF) = 0.0045 cfs 3.0 Detention The extended dry pond is designed to detain runoff so the post-developed peak rates from the 24 hour storm events will not exceed their respective 2, 10, and 25 year pre-developed peak runoff rates. There is a 0.4' permanent pool depth. The detention volume was set at the peak of the required 782 cf water quality volume. The pond has a 1.0' free board above the peak 25 year storm water height. SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 3.1 Pre-Developed Conditions if?R1=- EVEMIR :JEAN 1S Total Site Area (SF) 36,805 Impervious Area (SF) 0 Pervious Area (SF) 36,805 Weighted CN 82 Tc (MIN) 11.0 3.2 Developed Conditions IDEVELOBEDCONDLTIQNS Total Site Area (SF) 36,805 Impervious Area (SF) 26,059 Pervious Area (SF) 10,746 Weighted CN 94 Tc (MIN) 5.2 3.3 Pond Flow Summary 4 �DND W UMMA tf „. PRE- DEVELOPED DEVELOPED RELEASED PEAK WATER STORM EVENT FLOW (CFS) FLOW(CFS) FLOW (CFS) ELEV. 2 YEAR 0.18 0.41 0.18 164.65 10 YEAR 0.34 0.62 0.34 164.99 25 YEAR 0.43 0.72 0.43 165.11 3.4 Orifice Summary _ )flF1E511�M1Q ( STORM EVENT ELEV. SIZE(IN) WQ 162.90 0.40 2 YEAR 164.12 3.20 10 YEAR 164.65 2.80 25 YEAR 164.99 4.00 SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 4.0 APPENDIX I SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 4.1 Soils Map and Data S —W on( Or6 (St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion) o, n (o e E. N N N 517220 517230 517240 517250 517260 517270 517280 517290 517300 517310 517320 517330 517340 517350 517360 517370 517380 517390 45'25'49" ____ —_T. 45'25'49" 0 r f` C N Lso o co o 4 0/, .:2��nsf H 0 i n S Atrr 0 0 o o f� \ o r I` I In i' N N 4 OO j u7 r O v Fr y ri . 8 0 3 � iy '11 4w r r oo b �',\ iS. Cif m / M O N N / m O \` O 0 • O t', N I O O . m AO en O 45'25 45' 45"25'4S' 517220 517230 517240 517250 517260 517270 517280 517290 517300 517310 517320 517330 517340 517350 517360 517370 517380 517390 ° Map Scale:1:784 if printed on A size(8.5'x 11')sheet. ED ED ° v Meters N 0 10 20 40 60 -- N Feet 0 40 80 160 240 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map-Washington County,Oregon (St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) f7 Very Stony Spot Map Scale: 1:784 if printed on A size(8.5"x 11")sheet. Area of Interest(AOl) 4 Wet Spot The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:20,000. Soils A Other Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Soil Map Units measurements. Special Line Features Special Point Features Gully Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service • Blowout Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda-gov Short Steep Slope Coordinate System: UTM Zone 10N NAD83 Boi row Pit X Clay Spot ^- Other This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Political Features the version date(s)listed below. • Closed Depression p Cities Soil Survey Area: Washington County,Oregon • Gravel Pit Water Features Survey Area Data: Version 6,Jul 30,2008 Gravelly Spot Oceans Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 8/4/2005 (gi Landfill Streams and Canals The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were A. Lava Flow Transportation compiled and digitized probably differs from the background } -r Rails imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting ,�, Marsh or swamp of map unit boundaries may be evident. • Mine or Quarry Highways © Miscellaneous Water US Routes ® Perennial Water Major Roads ✓ Rock Outcrop Local Roads + Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot O Sinkhole 31 Slide or Slip Sodic Spot = Spoil Area +J Stony Spot i U,\ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 "1® Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Washington County,Oregon St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion Map Unit Legend Washington County,Oregon(OR067) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit'Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AOl 1 Aloha silt loam 1.3 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1.3 100.0% ism Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Water Features—Washington County, Oregon St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion Water Features This table gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet,and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Surface runoff refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based on slope, climate, and vegetative cover. The concept indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions. It is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal.The classes are negligible, very low, low, medium, high, and very high. The months in the table indicate the portion of the year in which a water table, ponding, and/or flooding is most likely to be a concern. Water table refers to a saturated zone in the soil.The water features table indicates, by month, depth to the top(upper limit)and base(lower limit)of the saturated zone in most years. Estimates of the upper and lower limits are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Water Features-Washington County.Oregon St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration, or evaporation. The table indicates surface water depth and the duration and frequency of ponding. Duration is expressed as very brief if less than 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, rare, occasional,and frequent.None means that ponding is not probable;rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of ponding is nearly 0 percent to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years (the chance of ponding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); and frequent that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years (the chance of ponding is more than 50 percent in any year). Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration and frequency are estimated. Duration is expressed as extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours, very brief if 4 hours to 2 days,brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none,very rare, rare,occasional,frequent,and very frequent. None means that flooding is not probable; very rare that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is less than 1 percent in any year); rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); frequent that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions(the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50 percent in all months in any year); and very frequent that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of any year). The information is based on evidence in the soil profile,namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and little or no horizon development. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods.Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Water Features–Washington County,Oregon St Anthony's Church-Parking Lot Expansion Report—Water Features Water Features–Washington County,Oregon Map unit symbol and soil Hydrologic Surface Month Water table Ponding Flooding name group runoff Upper limit Lower limit Surface Duration Frequency Duration Frequency depth -- -- Ft I Ft Ft ----- 1—Aloha silt loam Aloha C — January 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 — — I None — None C — February 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 — — None — None C — March 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 — — None — I None C — April 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 — None — I None C — December 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 — — None — I None Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Washington County, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 6, Jul 30, 2008 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/3/2008 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 4.2 Water Quality Orifice Calculations JOB -(-. air\-,"kun,u,4 / 65.---0/) WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. SHEET NO. OF 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy. Suite 150 CALCULATED BY n/, (i, DATE °3/1 S/D°) TIGARD, OREGON 97224 CHECKED BY DATE (503) 684-0652 FAX (503) 624-0157 SCALE /�75 e 0_51-1 ; *a 4/ -(t-v i, LU�.'fr i *IA a_-t c - C_ ,iC-4 \A, Q\) --- 0 , 3 LP C-kuk.. k. I. lP, 0 561 s F B 2. c---F / IL ci-V_R • f 1?or rrt gdu n+ P oo I o�.ep = a, -P + mr�r) E o�.efevi+t tip ) = 1 i o * w (NV - .7 S )- (--'- o Prcc 0_ o w n -I'L/,e ii-0 kr s -- w QV _ "lg2 17z1500 -7r = o- ob 5 c�, days - �i S j i z (29 i T 0 r Ob41 S ] :-. 0, 3 L? g N.('kJ-4- L (c"07 T - = 0, Li ,--,_,k,__ SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 4.3 Hydrographs and Detention Calculations SW GRANT PAIIING LOT EXPANSION — ST ANTHONY'S SCHOOL AND CHURCH I I I \ r — u . . ., . ...., 1714, „ki, • 1 \ \ 1 ' '..::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::.:•:.::::::::::::................:....:::: i! i ::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::.:.:::.:.:.:.:;:..:::....:.::::::::::::: 4._-, I 1! - .:....,...........:-...,:::.:•:.,-.L_ 1 I . .,:::::::.%:::::::::::.:::::::::::.::::::::........::............., 1 1 ::;,r',',7-'=177TTri7T:77'.t.'T,',,f-:rt:;TrI'Wt'ir::7171 It,. . ::....:::::::::::::::::;:•::::::::::.:.::::::.........;.:,:.;:,.........,:,.., w 1 Total Site Area (SF) 36,805 , .•_ , I 1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: .: ill 1 , •, „ _ , - ImpenAous Area (SF) 0 ,f ::::::::::.;:•::::::,•;•:::::::•::::::,.... I 11' ' .....:::::::::::::::::::::;;;;::::::::::::;:::::::::':::::::•::::::".•:::;: •-• • " " " '• • .- ••• •••••.••••••,..........,... if, TOTAL SITE AREA . -.4 ,. , . .. , . , . . ,- Pervious Area (SF) 36,805 , . •• ••- •.••....• ,. ... ... .... ... .. .. .. ....,. 4.. ... ... • , . , . ' Weighted CN 82 - •" .- •-••••••,.••.......... . ,, ii 1 ::•:::'...::::.::.:::...::.:.:::::::::.:::....:::•:::.'::::•.: II, '- u, ' ''''''::::::::::•::::::%::........:.:.:::.:•:.:.:,....:.:........-...,.... VI , ,,,, t Tc (MIN) 11.0 . 1 / = ...! i - .4. ' I - -- —..-...,'...:-.. . .....•••••••••••• 1 _ :1,,ml-imein=h.amt,m..... vieff„,m.-_itieTRIpAir-,•1.- , ,t,•_--•:_.-ai.:,•-•-.1_,,,___,...._.._* .., . . , •,, \. ' • ,. I * 1 ':::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_ .. _.._ ,,__ , , ,J, ,. --_ ,- --------. - -, . _-,-,., .-=----- -----7.-- .•„,„ Q- I ! , ...:.-- .....................:,-,•:,:............."...- -,,,..........,:-...-......:-......../...... ,....-,- :-.:-:••,•:•:• ,....,":•::•, :•.•::•::::,:.:•:--,::,:-.f:.:-.-.:.......:: :,::1.-.::-...\:::::::: I .,-- .-. ,,,,,' ,1 , I ' ' '' E ...:::::.':....•-•:•••••••::::....:::::::::::•:::::,::: ,..,.....::::::•:•:::::-../.::::: .........:::::::.........,.,,...., .•::.:.:-..... ::...-..../. ...,.......„......,-,..,..„...........:..........„............,.,......4.........„,,, __ iii,Ii , ,, c..... Total Site Area (SF) 36 805 .../.....:..4....:,..::.„,...:.......,.: .../::...,......,......„.,...:./...:.,...::,........:........:.,..v.:........::...:...::...:...:.........:......::::::.:...:::,.::...:..-.....:...........::,:.: ............. 1. A ,`',1 ' i . n ,, Impervious Area (SF) 26,059 • ' l'' :.::::":"....:'.:::1'::::/:::::::::::::::'::::::::':;/;:::::::'"'"'"'Y'::e:'....:::::::t:':::k::i'-':'::::::::::•":::::::*:::::::•:'::::•;'::::.::::':'/.....::•:::::::::.:.:.:':::::.::::.:.:.:;:,::.:.:.::::-...::::....:.::::....:.::::.:::..::.:.:.:::......„:......................,, i 1 ,..., i, i / • ± Pervious Area (SF) 10746 . ... - I i ''" ,....,., :E...-......::•....:.... ...:-....::...... ... ...•:.••:,..•:-:...::...:....,.. ::-. :....... :..•:...::-......::.-..:..-• 1 Z : :::;•:::::::••••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:••••;,:•:••••:•:•.•••••:•:•:':•:•::::::::::i,,:7::/,•:1::•:•:,:,:•:••;•:•:::::::•:•:•::•:•,;.;•;•:•:•.:::•::::•:•:•::::/;:t..::/,•:.::::•::::::,..,•;;;,....,:::::,..:.:-,,....:.:•.•::::•••::••••::: t, I tIt i ., , Weighted CN 94 ' .•••••::::::7-..:.:•.::........:.:•.:..:....*•...:.:.:.:'.:•::.:.:.:.:..k........t.:::.....::.:.:.•:-:.-........:-:.•:.:•:.:..:.:•:-:......7...........:•:.../,•;•:..:.:.::..:.:.:.x..::::.:...:•:..:.:•••:.....:.:,:.:).(...:....,::.......:•:-:.:.::,........:.;....::::,:....:•:. , CD - Tc (MIN) 5.2 li F.-- 1.:: ::::/:;..::::::::::::::::::::: ::::://1/: ''":::::::. x, :: , G 'L I '4 v::::::7::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. .::::::::.:::::::::::::•':..:,':::::■::.::'::-',.:::: 1::::::::,.;.;:.',..;.........:;.,;.:::::,....:::::::,•:,•,.',.:,:,...',..;:,......:,.........::::::,:j,:,.....:.,.,::.,...44............................,. .,......1 ,,,, ,.. , ,,i , .i., ' ':.'::.,..:•;•:;.:::%:•:•.'..,•:•: :::::.;...*:•;.; ,',' , '. ' .• - .. . .. ... .. . . , ,, ,, ,,,,i,„.„ ,., .......... ..... . , i i ,. z I ' ' /....::..;•:•:••••;:,•:.,:,.:::::;.:•:::',. •:',.2,.....,::::',.:.:',.......:',.;;::.: ..;...:"..."v:V.:' '..%%:'.'...r.:::'.;•:•:':.;:','...;:.'.....:.•:-.:.:'::::::::':',%"...'...:,.'.'.:::::1:::::':,:;:.::::•:•:.;:,:. 1 ', , i‘i,, .' cr)‘ I i i, •1,-,. -.......-::::::::-:-:,:-..:.::::•.:,:.:-...:?..:.:..:., ....„:::::::,•::.:.................-................,,........ .................,:,.........,............,.................,,,....„,:.......................,.....„.........................,................ . , I i v , ::::::::.:': :::::::::::.::::.1/1(' . ' ' "::•:•:'''''':::•:::::•:• ::::::::::.::/.:::.:,•:-•/'.....:••••••:::::::•:•:::::,:•:•:::-:-:•.4:..:-:-:•:•-z:::.:•:.:•,:.:.:::.:.:.:.:;.:.:.:.:;.......:.:::......... ., Ili, . . . i \ , . •\ y,i,.. -,-....--.:-y-...:: ::::,,,:•:•:...:•::::-..,..,:::•::.:,..„.......:.:•••.---.••..••, ,.........-....--.........,..........,:..,:................-.:.....:•....:„.„:„.........................-•-• . 4: „, ; „.. . , I -., , : A.,1,7,-.,,--.;.-:„...,...-.-..-:-:-:.,..........:.:-.....:.:•.,...:.:....,.:.:„...:..-:......:.:•:•.:.:.:-:-....,-.......,,,..:,.:.:.:-...:,:•.,:-:.:-.; :.-. :.:.,....,.:.:.:•:.:.:.,.....:_:_:-:-.:.::,....,.:.::::.:.......;.::..:.::::„....:.:.::-;:..:::::::.:::::/„..:.„...:;.:., :,,n,„ [ , ri I-i. ,-, .-,,..----,,:•••••,:•::-:•:•:•:,,..-:,:,,,::,"..,"..".."..."., ..--t•:-:•,,-::::.:.::"..........-4.....-:....:-y,-,::::•,:-:•:,...:.:,:-:•:_----....-,:-.•:.::::-.....:.:.:..:.:.:.:..;...........:,...,..y.......,,..,:„......,:,..,..4.::„...../....„-. F,1,1 2.--•-•',..--,\,:- „ II!'4..•,--..---__--->v• :t•-:::-:::::::•:•:::-:-:•::'.J _. ,, ,_,.:, / , . c.-i„...:-..:i.:.:::::•:=,,-,_-,::-..:.: ::::::.:.::::::.:.:;;;::.:.:....:::.:.::::: : .r, .. , .--.:-.,...,...., ;Atli,. -. ,-,:__A-- ..y.,..,.--,.:-:,:-.4-:.:-::.:. „,-, „,■,,,, , ,...f.,.. , ,...:.::,...:•,.....,,,,,,-;.:1::.„....:.::::.:-::.;.:.,.:::,....:.: ..-,_-. i f,..„-„,,....„_..., 7--,.:- --.- -.1 1. 4., , '':- ••.■ ''.. . , er--,.-------L.----.7,!, 1 ■o'' ■ i 1 , / 1 1 Ili': ,ligtr44 i • --- -% .. : \';‘,,,'',---;:h6i14-- -:------ -mi. _Au. • wit--iiii.''' -..,:;_:;;,-;,..;-, .1. y i..,/ ':::::5:::::::::::::::::::,:::::.:::::::..........,......,:. I GRANT AVE . ',o-m--m.f-iiik;-•-• o_..i.,...- .....-7------ . -40 ,,-. ,----," ' ,..-, -- -.,, •-• f-.--_, 1"A-• -k,.-,_. ....--—__,,,,._.,,,,_1.N ., , .--": .7-`+'...:^------"let.: - ?■"" ‘. .t,y,/ , --'-' ,.\ . ' '''S`i in'' IC: —'-'' ' -'177- -1.'•!•-ct'''' ''; -,L--4,._-, ''.. ' t7-----•------,p----r5,-•••r---- • i ! ..„, , r ,,, --.1---,..,...-1......•-„--1,___,,•••..., : , I ' ;1 el) I .- ____„„.. .7, ..• - - •______,,-,---.4-1-.1-,s • • . .-._ -----.'.-,../1 ._-_- --'u`I.1,....:;--'?-0-4,-,-...--___,::-..___ \ ----,--7,:-.---1r-„,-- _ _ _ ' ., , , ,... ■ --„, --- --_,_..,41-.(1-_,__...,„::::_-:, --- _, , -7---- -',7•J'.' ----::-7--.=:-...:_ j -J,---------t.-.T.1,72---- --'77--_--------;,-. 1 _'.•.) !I , ... ' ___ . . !-!---•-•••-7 .---- --,*--T--7.-; ----'-----•------'''- ------- ------ ------. ..---..._--Li / / - ,, GRAPHIC SCALE ... . __ _. : , j , - _ j - . . , 40 ,•.., •' , i i I ; .• • ,• -_,..77•-7-7.-a _,_•_- .- 0 =M 20 40 0 IMIMME80 , / S - • ( IN FEET )/ \ 1 I i \ \ 1 IN = 40 FT' / " / -- / : / / \ I , ; ,/ i d 1 ' s ■ ._) DATE 03.i 9.09 'Th DRAWN BY L 1 1 I CONSULTANTS INC. 4 M J CHECKED BY J - ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING I L7) REVISIONS PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER 15115 S.W. SEQUOIA PARKWAY, SUITE 150 (503) 684-0652 JOB NO 1 095-01 1 ) TIGARD,OREGON 97224 FAX (503) 624-0157 F______\ r\ / / \ 1S � 2S /�/ 1P\ / Pre-Developed Site - Developed Site - Extended Dry Basin Existing and Expansion Existing and Expansion Area Area �ubcat Reach -on• Drainage Diagram for STORM REPORT Prepared by Westlake Consultants 3/19/2009 HydroCADO 7.10 sin 002749 ®2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.5D" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.18 cfs @ 8.05 hrs, Volume= 3,061 cf, Depth= 1.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.50" Area (sf) CN Description 36,805 82 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 11.0 135 0.0370 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph z 0.19= Q Runoff j o.1 B cfs I. 0.18- Type IA':24-hr CWS 2 YR 0.17' e sin 0.16'. 'Rai nfall=2.50" 015- Runoff Area=36,805 sf 0.13", Runoff Volume=3,061 cf 0.1, Runoff Depth=1 .00" 0.09- _A Flow Length=135' 0.08_ , 0.0T Tc=11 .0 min 0.06'. i 0.05-_ 0.04 0.03- 0.02' 0.01'. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 5,734 cf, Depth= 1.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.50" Area (sf) CN Description 26,059 98 Paved parking & roofs 10,746 86 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG C 36,805 94 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 15 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 1.7 95 0.0100 0.9 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.50" 1.1 155 0.0050 2.4 0.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Diam= 8.0" Area= 0.3 sf Perim= 2.1' r= 0.17' n= 0.013 5.2 265 Total Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph . D.46 D Runoff . .r D.4 :.. Type.1A• 4-hr CWS 2•YR 0.38: , D.36; Rain all=2.50. . D.32 :_ • _ ; _ :Runoff.Area=36;80.5 .sf.. 0.3 0.28: _._. Runoff Volume=5,734_cf .26- Runoff Depth=1..87" a.2a LL 0.227: Flow Length=265' 0.18: C • 0.18: T =5.2 min 0.14= 0.12, CN=9 0.1 0.06= 0.04` . 0.00 �//O/////i,6".49,ifs'O07ZZ/� /!7.7/f/�/�f�1T/ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin Inflow Area = 36,805 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.87" for CWS 2 YR event Inflow = 0.41 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 5,734 cf Outflow = 0.18 cfs @ 8.38 hrs, Volume= 5,140 cf, Atten= 56%, Lag= 29.1 min Primary = 0.18 cfs @ 8.38 hrs, Volume= 5,140 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 164.65' @ 8.38 hrs Surf.Area= 1,239 sf Storage= 1,534 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 291.5 min calculated for 5,140 cf (90% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time 222.0 min ( 947.6 - 725.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.66' 3,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 162.66 305 0 0 163.00 479 133 133 164.00 924 702 835 165.00 1,411 1,168 2,002 166.00 1,782 1,597 3,599 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 162.90' 0.4" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #2 Primary 164.12' 3.2" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #3 Primary 164.65' 2.8" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #4 Primary 164.99' 4.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 Primary OutFlow Max=0.18 cfs @ 8.38 hrs HW=164.65' (Free Discharge) -1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.01 cfs @ 6.5 fps) -2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.17 cfs @ 3.1 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) -4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 2 YR Rainfall=2.50" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin I Hydrograph 0.46- Inflow 0.44= 1041 ate I 2 Primary 0.42= :''Inflow -Area-36,805 sf 0.4 0.38 __: Peak-Elev=164:65' 0.36_ 0.34 Storage-1 ,534 cf 0.32 0.3 0.28= . 7i. 0.261 0.24: " c 0.22 li 0.21 I o.18 do 0.18= • 0.16 0.14 - 0.12 0.1 0.08= 0.06- F 0.04,: - .._, .., - 0.02: #;-« a;r.rr r s f 0 2 4 6 6 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) I SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.34 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 5,341 cf, Depth= 1.74" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs. dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Area (sf) CN Description 36,805 82 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 11.0 135 0.0370 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph 0.38= (Runoff 10.34c 4s1 0.34- Type pe -IA 24-hr-CWS 10 YR 0.32 Rainfall=3.45" 0.28= Runoff Area=36,805 sf 0.24; Runoff Volume=5,341 cf - Runoff Depth-1.7 0.2= o 0.,8= " • E Flow ;Length=135'--- LL 0.16= •0 ,4= Tc=11-:0 min 0.12' F CN=82 0.06- 0.04=" , .. "e0( D 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 8,548 cf, Depth= 2.79" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Area (sf) CN Description 26,059 98 Paved parking & roofs 10,746 86 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG C 36,805 94 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 15 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 1.7 95 0.0100 0.9 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.50" 1.1 155 0.0050 2.4 0.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Diam= 8.0" Area= 0.3 sf Perim= 2.1' r= 0.17' n= 0.013 5.2 265 Total Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph D Runoff 0.65- 0.82 de 0.6= Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR 0.55- Rainfal l=3.45" 0.5- I Runoff Area=36,805 sf.. 0.45- - Runoff-Volume=.8,548-cf w 0.4- ' •- Runoff;Depth=2.79 -- _. 0.35- • LL 0.3_ • Flow Length=265' 0.25- Tc=5.2 min•0.2- • CN=94 • 0.15- 0.05_ o- .0112//!//��fffei�/ rird�i/f,Y����f.`6����f 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 3C 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 5C Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin Inflow Area = 36,805 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.79" for CWS 10 YR event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 7.89 hrs, Volume= 8,548 cf Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 8.20 hrs, Volume= 7,951 cf, Atten= 44%, Lag= 18.8 min Primary = 0.34 cfs @ 8.20 hrs, Volume= 7,951 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 164.99' @ 8.20 hrs Surf.Area= 1,405 sf Storage= 1,986 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 214.9 min calculated for 7,949 cf (93% of inflow) 1 Center-of-Mass det. time 166.2 min ( 873.0 - 706.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.66' 3,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 162.66 305 0 0 163.00 479 133 133 164.00 924 702 835 165.00 1,411 1,168 2,002 166.00 1,782 1,597 3,599 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 162.90' 0.4"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #2 Primary 164.12' 3.2"Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #3 Primary 164.65' 2.8" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #4 Primary 164.99' 4.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 Primary OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 8.20 hrs HW=164.99' (Free Discharge) 1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.01 cfs @ 7.2 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.24 cfs @ 4.3 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.10 cfs @ 2.3 fps) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 10 YR Rainfall=3.45" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin / Hydrograph i oss ere I ®Primary 0.65- Inflow Area=36,805 sf 0.6 0.55- Peak Elev=164.99' o.5= Storage=1 ,986 cf 0.45- 0.4 034 er. 0.35- O O ;%'-j _. u. 0.3- 0.25- f 0.2- % d 0.15 // r 0.1= ",11:610�1.l / s s 0.05- . �?ff�.1.�if erect e.576, 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) • SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.43 cfs @ 8.03 hrs, Volume= 6,495 cf, Depth= 2.12" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Area (sf) CN Description 36,805 82 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG C Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 11.0 135 0.0370 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" Subcatchment 1S: Pre-Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph 0.48. 0.46 Runoff Type-0.444 = p 24-hr CWS 25 YR .. 0.B l Rainfall=3.90" 0.34 s Runoff;Area=36,805..sf- 0.32- - f Runoff.Volume=6,495 cf 0.3 u 0.28 • 0.26. Runoff Depth=2.12. 0.24 Flow Length=15' C 0.22 1= 3- _._._._.. ...-t -: _._.- — . LL 0.2 0.18: Tc=11.0 - 0.16 0 _ CN 82 .14- 0.12 r Fr 0.08- 0.04 0.02 arm re4 ,p7ir r- :° Ate- �rS; -ra:ar`; drA r'^`"4 M '_ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD® 7.10 sin 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Runoff = 0.72 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 9,896 cf, Depth= 3.23" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Area (sf) CN Description 26,059 98 Paved parking & roofs 10,746 86 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG C 36,805 94 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 15 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.50" 1.7 95 0.0100 0.9 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.50" 1.1 155 0.0050 2.4 0.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Diam= 8.0" Area= 0.3 sf Perim= 2.1' r= 0.17' n= 0.013 5.2 265 Total Subcatchment 2S: Developed Site - Existing and Expansion Area Hydrograph ❑Runoff 0.751 0.72 cfs Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR 0.65= Rainfall=3.90" 0.6- -Runoff Area=36;805 sf 0.5 Runoff Volume=9,896 Of. N 0.45-r. Runoff Depth=3.23" 0.4= 0.35 flow Length-265' Tc=5.2 min o.25- " %j CN=94 rde : zH %0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin Inflow Area = 36,805 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.23" for CWS 25 YR event Inflow = 0.72 cfs © 7.88 hrs, Volume= 9,896 cf Outflow = 0.43 cfs @ 8.16 hrs, Volume= 9,298 cf, Atten= 41%, Lag= 16.8 min Primary = 0.43 cfs @ 8.16 hrs, Volume= 9,298 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-50.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 165.11' @ 8.16 hrs Surf.Area= 1,453 sf Storage= 2,164 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 193.6 min calculated for 9,296 cf (94% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 151.0 min ( 851.4 - 700.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.66' 3,599 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 162.66 305 0 0 163.00 479 133 133 164.00 924 702 835 165.00 1,411 1,168 2,002 166.00 1,782 1,597 3,599 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 162.90' 0.4" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #2 Primary 164.12' 3.2" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #3 Primary 164.65' 2.8" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 #4 Primary 164.99' 4.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.620 Primary OutFlow Max=0.43 cfs @ 8.16 hrs HW=165.11' (Free Discharge) 1=OrificefGrate (Orifice Controls 0.01 cfs @ 7.4 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.26 cfs @ 4.6 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.13 cfs @ 2.9 fps) 4=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 1.2 fps) SW GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION - ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH & SCHOOL STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin Hydrograph 0.8-/ ®Inflow 10.72de I Primary 0J5= Inflow Area=36,805 sf 0.7= 0.fi5= Peak EIev=165.11' 06 Storage=2,164 cf 0.553" 0.5= 0.45_ 10.43 eta 0.4= 3 0.35= 0.3= 0.25 0.2-E 0.05 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Time (hours) STORM REPORT2 Type IA 24-hr CWS 25 YR Rainfall=3.90" Prepared by Westlake Consultants HydroCAD®7.10 s/n 002749 ©2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3/19/2009 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Extended Dry Basin Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 162.66 305 0 165.26 1,507 2,382 162.71 331 16 165.31 1,526 2,458 162.76 356 33 165.36 1,545 2,534 162.81 382 52 165.41 1,563 2,612 r- .162.86 407 71 165.46 1,582 2,691 1 L 162.91 433 92 165.51 1,600 2,770 (-1 162.96 459 115 165.56 1,619 2,851 163.01 483 138 165.61 1,637 2,932 163.06 506 163 165.66 1,656 3,014 163.11 528 189 165.71 1,674 3,098 163.16 550 216 165.76 1,693 3,182 163.21 572 244 165.81 1,712 3,267 163.26 595 273 165.86 1,730 3,353 163.31 617 303 165.91 1,749 3,440 163.36 639 335 165.96 1,767 3,528 163.41 661 367 163.46 684 401 1 163.51 706 435 163.56 728 471 163.61 750 508 163.66 773 546 163.71 795 586 163.76 817 626 163.81 839 667 r. 163.86 862 710 163.91 884 753 163.96 906 798 164.01 929 844 164.06 953 891 ••,4•f2 164.11 978 9394__cots 164.16 1,002 989 `� u-+"hia.. Uf1s-l- 164.21 1,026 1,040 w� c`'t�a�r�:41;r�°� `'dal_ 164.26 1,051 1,091 164.31 1,075 1,145 ��� 9 `' ..139 164.36 1,099 1,199 9115 , ' _ . 1 164.41 1,124 1,255 - � - /&x(,11 _ ) �r�,ti A 164.46 1,148 1,311 164.51 1,172 1,369 %34i r N 164.56 1,197 1,429 I (y�,(. n1 : S° - �r vb° 164.61 1,221 1,489 ( � �� f7,os 164.66 1,245 1,551 164.71 1,270 1,614 rY 164.76 1,294 1,678 • 164.86 1,343 1,870 q � : (' 1, Gbv) �(r-1•11p _{ 0 164.91 1,367 1,877 164.96 1,392 1,946 b (71 165.01 1,415 2,016 165.06 1,433 2,088 165.11 1,452 2,160 6) q S ' (D-b-b CO -/i13,1 I) 1. .16 ,• • ,233 L_I 165.21 1,489 2,307 • . 1 3 SE Grant Parking Lot Expansion — St Anthony's School & Church Tigard, OR 4.4 Conveyance Westlake Consultants, Inc. MLJ 16: 05 24-Mar-09 Project 1095-011 OSH - Salem GRAVITY PIPE FLOW (Chezy-Manning) Internal Sizing n . 12" diameter = 8.0" slope = 0 .50% material: high density poly Manning's n = 0 .013 depth of flow = 93 .82% of diameter (max) wetted perimeter = 1.76' area = 0 .34 s.f. hydraulic radius = 0.19' velocity = 2 .71 fpss flow = 0. 92 cfs ,/bk.,` pces-I 0.72_ Westlake Consultants, Inc. MLJ 16: 05 24-Mar-09 Project 1095-011 OSH - Salem GRAVITY PIPE FLOW (Chezy-Manning) Existing Connection to Public CB �2" diameter = 8.0" slope = 1.21% material : high density poly Manning' s n = 0 .013 depth of flow = 93 .82% of diameter (max) wetted perimeter = 1.76' area = 0.34 s.f . hydraulic radius = 0 .19' velocity = 4.21 fps flow = 1.43 cfs b IL` Exhibit G Arborist report & tree protection plan 104. :6/2008 11:53 5036351543 TREE CAPE UNL IMI TED PAr E 02/04 " ri L` Sr • �- •r••ti♦♦' 1' lJ ARBORIST REPORT '1/in '%lit" Nature of the Report: St Anthony's - SW Grant sidewalk - potential impact to two large Ponderosa Pines as shown on plan Address of the Report St Anthonys SW Grant oortland, OR Date of the Report: Apr?I 15, 2008 Report Submitted To: Ankrom Moisan .Architects PH• 503-977-5233 Attn: Drew Rocker FX: 5003-245-7710 e-mail: d-ewr @amaa.com I met with Drew at St. Anthony's on April 7, 2008 to look at the Pondera Pines and provide some guidelines for the proposed public sidewalk. i have been the arborist on several recent projects at St. Anthonys. As discussed you can get close, within 3' of the N tree since the existing grade is relatively flat. The sidewalk would probably get too close if we run it in front of the tree but there is room to meander the sidewalk behind without getting past the 10 feet dedication the City had previously requested to align with the property line at the existing SW Grant parking lot Regarding the southern Pine tree, the grade difference is up +/- 2 feet at the neighbor's property line so I am recommending curving the sidewalk by the curb to avoid the surface roots, as well as adjusting the grade of the walk to accommodate the roots I am recommending that we supervise excavation to prevent damage to the surface roots or that our landscaping company do the excavation. Enclosed is a recommended tree protection plan. I believe you have a plan that is showing the sidewalk route we discussed that comolres with my recommendations. Re ctfully, Raymond Myer, General Manager Tree Care & Landscapes Unlimited, Inc. Certified Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture, Lic. It PN-0160 Oregon Landscape Contractors Lic. 11604 Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, Commercial P,e;idotgtirdEcpirj oitt tbEs re9swtiC+l ag37Pronmr3• Landscape Mst:illation -Landscape Milintenanc:? •�on5r,::�tiin r,al-MBER. Tree Care Industry Association • International Society 01 Arboricr.tlture • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association Construction Contractor 1162635 • Landscape Contactor :55652. • Chemical Application 40(10231 • Insurer) P 0 l3ox 1566 • Lake Oswego. OP 97035 • 503.635.3165 • Vancouver 360-737.264ii • Fax 503-105.1549 Visit our t•al;;ite • E-mail. in( tclu corn I -1 'E,/'2 00S 11: 5'3 5036351543 TREE CAPE !Jt1LIMITEr P;°,:�E 0 3 ci.t L C7-`1C k 'nfriscr L� �'•• .;•""•I Tree Protection Plan REVISED 7.'27(05 1-'nJlrnilc [ _ SITE ADDRESS S 1 �Y ail) 6 v.. r ■ N ` q Ni Y GI Follow the below listed instructions in order to provide the proper protection before, during and after construction for tree ; __t 7.-- • I. Before Construction;, tk NAn-App. �/ a. Identify and number the trees to be protected, verify by mapping and;or tagging and note their size in D.B.H. (Diameter at Breast Height), variety, health and structural conditions, review plans. z ---0 5. Check with local government agencies for tree protection ordinances. C it c. Remove any low limbs that may be in the way of construction equipment, and prune as needed to adhere NAA standards. r/. d. Leave a protective covering on the soil. i.e., existing groundcover or mulch. e. Notify all other contractors that these trees are to be saved and protected. f. Install a temporary 6' high metal no-climb fence to protect the trees and their root systems. Install tree protection sign on fence. Posts located 10' on center as a general rule. For every inch in diameter of the trunk (D.B.H.) allow up to 1 foot of radius from the trunk as the protected area. ;Example: 24" D.B.H. = 24' radius of protected root system.) Ideally, we need to protect more than the drip zone. The drip zone into the trunk is the support roots that hold the tree up. The roots from that drip zone out provide nutrition, water and oxygen. Try to avoid loss of more than 30% of root on any one side. This allows some encroachment within the drip line. This should be determined on a sase by case site conditions reviewed, (SEE c-, ENCLOSED SITE PLAN) \-�'� Tt,vbQ'-- LS 1"c.� S� ylevV k c- -_7�C� v�i-N� °r vJc�� g. Identify any insect or disease problems that may require treatment. h. Engineer and design proposed structures and construction to avoid root loss. Bridge type foundations can save major roots. ,a-{' .- . Design landscape islands and planting areas large enough to accommodate trees at maturity. D r.---i. Plant the right tree in the right place. Avoid future conflicts with buildings and utilities. 1 ,= k. Have an experienced Arborist review landscape plan to assure the right tree is planted in the right place and proposed changes don't kill retained mature trees. ._ I. Consider tree removals adjacent to trees to be saved for wind related stability concerns. Residential and Commercial Spraying • Fertilizing• Pruning • Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: Tree Care Ind stry Association • International Society of Arboriculture - Oregon Landscape Contractors Association Construction Contractor 162635 • Landscape contractor#5659 • Chemical Application tWWW00231 • InsurC•d P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego. OR 97035 • 503.635-3165 • Vancouver 360-737.2646 • Fax 503-635.1549 Visit our website at www.tClu corn • E-mail! info r4 tciu.com 04/16/2009 11: 59 5036351549 TREE ' APE IJIILImITEE. Piar:E .1,-1/111,4 4ps. Non-App_ y m. Check for oast and proposed grade and drainage changes, consider the effects. n. Check trees for stability. • e. Remove all trees that would not su-vive. the effects of chanoe. Remove al: hazardous trees. p. Minimize environmental changes. IL During_Construction_ Z c a. Keep equipment off of the root system to avoid compaction. :; b. Keep equipment away from structure to prevent damage to trunk and limbs. Z.) c. Don't allow chemicals to be dumped on the ground near the tree, i.e., gasoline, diesel, Dal r.:, herbicide, cleaner, thinners, etc. / = d. Provide means of temporary irrigation if the project runs through the summer. 7 e. If roots or limbs are cut or damaged, have them inspected by an IS.A Certified A.rborist and repaired or treated according tc his/her recommendations. /C f. Protect the trees from excessive heat, i.e., equipment, paving and/or burning. (< _-, q. Avoid trenching through the root systems, boring under them or hand digging can save roots '� — h. Contact the ISA Certified Arborist familiar with the site prior to and during zany activity within f the drip zone or tree protection fencing for consultation. e 'tD Y\ -� 2 ..ccl v`o-T(7 ` surv.III. After Construction:, / 7 Ti a. Carefully landscape the area under the tree, being careful of the roots and structure. Use plantings that will live under the same conditions as that of the tree. r b. Provide insect and disease control fertilization and pruning as needed or adhere to long-term protection clan if provided. ZIT c. Avoid direct irrigation spraying onto the trunk. The amount of irrigation needed to keep new plantings alive can often be enough to kill mature trees. C d Do not cover existing root systems with more than 2" of soil. The more soil you add, the greater the chances of damaging the root system. : e. P-ovide irrigation and/or drainage to emulate pre-construction conditions. ,Z/ NOTE: This tree protection plan identifies construction protection measures to prevent unwarranted tree loss. The identified measures limit the amount of earth disturbance surrounding the trees, and limit the removal of the tree's root systems. Due to the variation of every project, it is unlikely all of the above identified measures can be practicably applied to each individual tree; nor is it likely each measure is necessary to retain each tree. Prior to the beginning of construction a meeting between a certified arborist and the necessary contractors will be held to determine the appropriate level of protection for each tree, in relation to what work needs to be completed in the tree's vicinity. On site supervision by a certified arborist will he determined and supplied as necessary. Exhibit H Traffic Evaluation TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Traffic Evaluation Date: November 12,2002 Project#: 5610 To: Brian Rager,City of Tigard From: Judith Gray cc: Father Leslie Sieg St. Anthony's School and Church proposes to redevelop the existing site located on Highway 99W between SW McKenzie Street and SW Johnson Street in Tigard, Oregon. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. was asked to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project. The redevelopment plan includes the following: Phase IA Gymnasium: Physical education building and gymnasium with support facilities including locker rooms and PE teacher office (approximately 10,500 square feet). Middle School & Library: Remodel of existing building with slight expansion (220 square feet), including two classrooms and enlarged library and media center facilities. The expansion will increase the school capacity from 400 to 450 students. Phase 1B Community Center: Assembly building including kitchen, toilet rooms, mechanical room and storage (approximately 15,000 square feet). Site Development: Addition of approximately 33 spaces around buildings, and modifying on-site vehicle circulation by providing internal connection between SW Grant and SW Johnson Avenues, and increased on-site passenger loading area. The existing and proposed site plans are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. FILENAME:R:\archive-pdx5\5610 H\report\5610TMEM.doc St. Anthony's School/Church. development Project#.• 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 2 Existing Traffic Operations The peak weekday traffic periods for St. Anthony's correspond to the beginning and end of the school day at St. Anthony's school. The school day runs from 8 a.m. through 3 p.m. each weekday, except for Wednesday, when school ends at 2 p.m. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. visited the site during a Thursday afternoon and Friday morning to observe peak period traffic operations for St. Anthony's. • The majority of vehicles access St. Anthony's school and church utilizing a one-way circulation pattern. Traffic entering from Highway 99W turns northwest on SW McKenzie Avenue, which is a one-way road, turns right onto SW Grant Avenue, and turns right onto SW Johnson Avenue. Avenue. Left-turn restrictions into parking areas on SW Johnson Avenue reinforce the one-way circulation pattern. Passenger loading/unloading occurs primarily on site with some on adjacent streets, but is concentrated at parking lots accessed by SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson. Congestion in the parking/passenger loading areas occurred during both the morning and afternoon peak periods before and after school. In both cases, vehicle queues spilled onto the adjacent streets (SW Grant and Johnson Avenues). Queues on SW Johnson Avenue extended to SW Grant Avenue and wrapped around the corner along SW Grant Avenue. Although the queues occurred during both peak periods, the duration of the congested conditions was short, lasting only 15 to 20 minutes in both cases. SW Grant Avenue has narrow lanes and vehicles are unable to pass queues without entering the opposing traffic lanes. However, background traffic in the area has an alternative route via SW Walnut Street, which has a traffic signal at the intersection with Highway 99W. SW Johnson Street is wide enough for vehicles to by-pass queues without encroaching in the opposing lane. While the queuing conditions at the parking lot entrances are not ideal, they do not represent a significant operational or safety concern because they occur at predictable times, they are of very short duration, and the signalized Highway 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection provides an alternative routes for non-school traffic. The Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections operated acceptably during both observation periods. The only delays were related to downstream traffic on Highway 99W, and not from traffic generated by the St. Anthony's site. Development Impacts The proposed development plan is generally intended to improve facilities for existing activities, rather than increase attendance or event capacity. Only the middle school remodel is expected to accommodate increased activity. Specifically, the additional two classrooms will increase enrollment capacity from 400 to 450 students. Trip Generation St. Anthony's does not provide bus or shuttle service, so the majority of students are dropped off and picked up by passenger vehicles. Currently, there are 380 students enrolled from 277 families, for an average of 1.4 children per family. According to church personnel, some families Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon St.Anthony's School/Church. ,evelopment Project#: 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 3 are able to carpool with each other. Therefore, presuming that the ratio remains somewhat constant, the additional 50-student capacity could result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles dropping off/picking up children at the start and end of the school day. Intersection Operations Given the observed adequacy of intersection operations of the Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections during these periods, the increased traffic resulting from the proposed development plan will not significantly impact traffic operations. Vehicle Queuing The proposed development plan includes modifications to the internal circulation and provision of approximately 360 feet along the front of the future Community Center for passenger loading/ unloading, in addition to increased drive aisles in the parking areas that could internalize peak period vehicle queues. Thus, queuing conditions will likely improve once the proposed redevelopment is complete. Summary Field observations indicate that the St. Anthony's School and Church have no significant impacts on the transportation system, with the exception of queue spillback at the parking lot driveways. The queuing conditions are of short duration, lasting approximately 15 to 20 minutes during the peak morning arrival and afternoon departure periods. Residents in the area have an alternative route to access Highway 99W via the signalized intersection with SW Walnut Street. Therefore, it is not a significant operational or safety concern. The proposed development plan will increase student enrollment capacity at the school, which would result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles during these peak periods. This increase is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations in the vicinity. Furthermore, the modified site circulation plan, with designated passenger loading area, will likely improve the current peak period queuing conditions. Based on this evaluation, the proposed redevelopment can occur while maintaining safe and efficient operations of the surrounding transportation system. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at 503-228-5230. Sincerely, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Judith Gray Mark Vandehey, P.E. Transportation Planner Principal Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Exhibit I Right of Way Dedication WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC ENGINEERING •SURVEYING •PLANNING Phone: 503 684-0652 Fax: 503 624-0157 Right of Way Dedication Project No. 1095-11(F2) St. Anthony's Church May 21, 2009 EXHIBIT A Right of Way Description A tract of in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon,being a portion of that tract of land as conveyed by deed to, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland Oregon, and successors, a corporation sole for the benefit of St. Anthony's Church, recorded November 22, 2002 in Document No. 2002-141586, Washington County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: The most Easterly 10.00 feet, in even width, of said St. Anthony's Church tract, abutting the Westerly right of way line of SW Grant Avenue, said right of way line, being 20.00 feet when measured at right angles, from the centerline thereof, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northeasterly corner of said St. Anthony's Church tract, said point being on said Westerly right of way line, South 39° 53' 00" West, 87.97 feet more or less to the most Northerly boundary line of Document No. 97075182; Thence along said Northerly boundary line, North 54° 43' 00" West, 10.03 feet; Thence departing said Northerly boundary line, North 39° 53' 00" East, being parallel with, and 10.00 feet westerly of said Westerly right of way line, 87.45 feet more or less to the Southerly boundary line of Document No. CF4036; Thence South 57° 38' 48" East, 10.09 feet, to the REGISTERED POINT OF BEGINNING. PROFESSIONAL LANp SURVEYOR Containing 877 square feet of land more or less. /1/: Basis of Bearings per Document No. 2003-073772, Washington County Deed Records. OREGON � y JANUARY 15, 1987 JOHN P. TACCHINI 2267 06-30-10 RENEWAL DATE Pacific Corporate Center, 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Sidle 150,Tigard, Oreiwon 97224 n•,,.,, t -ri I- — — — , `0. • i . i DOCUMENT N0 DOCUMENT NO. I DOCUMENT NO. I 98018932 CF4036 1 2006-000828 2/27/1998 1/4/2006 1 Q • • POINT OF BEGINNING ~ .1 I Q S5T38'48"E 316.39' • CD 10.09 N v) / DOCUMENT NO. ^ ;n \ I C7 2003-060015 W 877 SQ.FT.-/ ,: ,rn I 4/17/2003 M DOCUMENT NO. 2002-141586 W�\ Q ;� 11/22/2002 0. \\ 0 20' m 3D, Z n in ! I 1Q. RIGHT OF WAY Z i DEDIC C:7'5 A TION O 10.03' 1 1 m N54.43'00'W 309.74' ti DOCUMENT NO 1 i REGISTERED -_....._...__.... ..._._._...._._..__.._._._._._. • 97075182 PROFESSIONAL 8/14/1997 j LAND SURVEY R •, ■ 7-4._-,7- ' .----- • It1/4 o EXHIBIT B / OREGON JANUARY 15, 1987 DATE: 05/21/09 LOCATED IN A PORTION OF JOHN P. TACCHINI DRAWN BY: RKR ��� �ESTLA SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, 2267 CONSULTANTS INC . CHECKED BY:JPT RANGE 1 WEST, W.M., CITY OF ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, 06-30-10 PAGE 1 OF 1 PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER SCALE 1" = 40' OREGON RENEWAL DATE 1095-11(F2) 15115 S.W. SEQUOIA PARKWAY SUITE 150 583 684—nc52 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 FAX (503) 024 U157J Exhibit J Conditional Use Application SW Grant Pkg. Lot Expansion Plan Set • C100 Cover Sheet • C101 General Notes • C102 Demolition &Erosion control Plan • C103 Grading and Storm Drainage Plan • C104 Details Sheet • A1.00 Site Development Plan • A2.00 Existing Conditions • A3.00 Vicinity Map • L1.0 Landscape Plan • L2.0 Landscape Plan • ELI Lighting Design V r B17 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION a Fs SW • y GRANT PKG. LOT EXPANSION i ST. ANTHONY' S SCHOOL •w5 • �Z Ifi iU COUNTY ORhGON W ��5 COTY OF 1GARJ, WASH I NGT N ') -= srg _ TAX LOT 1600 T2S, MIN,,SECTION 02BB p z O Milli w MINIM z 0 LOCATION ' SHEET INDEX �\, z r � NAME: NO. W o0• S� r N7 , ss COVER SHEET C100 / 'i °4 .1`. ~ 4 W f. , F- 9‘A'Lp ' GENERAL NOTES C101 i . �'"'` O W DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C102 i \ '>`s'' - }='. • Z c/1 O GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN C103 ` , ° '1 J SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A1.00 ~• / / 0 . 8 So m EXISTING CONDITIONS A2.00 / / . rVICINITY MAP A3.00 Q 1 f— LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 I1 Z C� LANDSCAPE PLAN � 1 ,'' Q I- VICINffY MAP I L2.0 NOT TO SCALE M LIGHTING DESIGN ELI LOCATION MAP O CD I- U LEGEND EIpSTMIG TS O 'Nn o �l ROW CENTERUNE 0 ELECTRIC RISER ® MAIL BOX ' GENERAL NOTES: ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS,SPECIFICATIONS,CODES,AND REQUIREMENTS Of CITY OF TIGARD,CLEAN WATER SERVICES R50 07.20.THE OREGON STATE PLUNBIHG SPECIALTY CODE.AND 2007 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS INCLUDING SUCH INCIDENTALS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET APPLICABLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS AND OTHERS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A COMPLETED PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE APPROPRIATE PERMITS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS WITH ALL APPROVED REVISIONS ON THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. ANY CHANGES SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO AGENCIES FOR APPROVAL 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AND MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ON THIS SITE.ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THIS DRAWING,SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.EXISTING SURFACE FEATURES AND FENCING SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK,INCLUDING POTHOLING. 7. THE EXISTENCE AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS WERE DETERMINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE PUBLIC RECORDS.THE LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF THESE UTILITIES ARE FROM THESE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR.NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED BY EITHER THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER FOR ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS. B. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY CITY,COUNTY,AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS(2 BUSINESS DAYS)PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION BY CALLING'ONE CALL'AT 2468699 OR 1-800.332-2344 AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE AGENCIES,AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF OAR 952.001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. 9. AFTER LOCATES ARE REQUESTED AND UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE PROVIDED LOCATES,CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE TO THE DEPTH OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AND PROVIDE WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC.AND THE APPROPRIATE INSPECTOR.72 HOURS NOTICE OF ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE RELOCATION OF BURIED AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AS-BUILT DRAWINGS AND A SURVEY COMPLETED BY WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ELEVATIONS TO HIS OR HER SATISFACTION. 13.ANY ALTERATION OR VARIANCE FROM THESE PLANS,EXCEPT MINOR FIELD ADJUSTMENTS NEEDED TO MEET EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS.SHALL FIRST BE APPROVED BY THE APPLICABLE AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE AM)THE ENGINEER. 14.ANY CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION BY THE CITY OR THE ENGINEER,SHALL NOT,IN ANY WAY,RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM ANY OBLIGATION TO PERFORM THE WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 15.APPROVED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIAL,EQUIPMENT.AND PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN SUCH EROSION PROTECTION MEASURES.ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY EROSION SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 18.DEMOLITION WORK SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL STUMPS AND VEGETATION DEBRIS.CONFORMANCE WITH ALL REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 17.AU.OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING STREETS SHALL BE PATCHED WITH AC.,COLD(TEMPORARY)OR HOT MIX,AT THE CLOSE OF EACH WORK DAY.TRENCHES SHALL NOT BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT. 18.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(MUTCD)AS MODIFIED BY THE OREGON SUPPLEMENTS. 19.PROVIDE 18-GAGE TRACER WIRE FOR ALL NONMETALLIC UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINS,WATERLINES,AND SANITARY SEWERS. 20.ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE 314'.1).CRUSHED ROCK FROM A MINIMUM 4'BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE FIFE TO THE SPRING LINE FOR PIPE SMALLER THAN 18'DIAMETER,AND IT MINIMUM FOR 18'DIAMETER OR LARGER.TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE AS NOTED IN THE TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL. 21.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED WITH ALL INSPECTORS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK 22.CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING PROPERTY MONUMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.ANY MONUMENTS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE REPLACED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 23.ATTENTION:OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER.THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090.YOU MAY OBTAIN COPES OF THESE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER.(NOTE:THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER I5(503)232-1987.) COMPACTION NOTES: 1. STRUCTURAL LOT FILL: MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED:90% TEST METHOD REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:7-180 FREQUENCY OF DENSITY TESTING IN LOTS:IT UFTS 3 TEST FOR EACH 2 FEET OF FILL 2. ROAD SECTION-EMBANKMENT: MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED:90%BELOW 3'OF SUBGRADE.95%WITHIN 3'OF SUBGRADE TEST METHOD REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:T-99 OR T-180 FREQUENCY OF DENSITY TESTING OF EMBANKMENT:IT LIFTS 3 TESTS FOR EACH S OF EMBANKMENT 3. ROAD SECTION-SUBGRADE MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED 95% PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED TO WHAT DEPTH BELOW SUBGRADE:1 FOOT TEST METHOD REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:AASHTO T-99 FREQUENCY OF DENSITY TESTING OF SUBGRADE:AS NEEDED 4. ROAD SECTION-AGGREGATE BASE MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED:95% TEST METHODS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:O5HD TM 108 OR T-99 FREQUENCY OF DENSITY TESTING OF AGGREGATE BASE:AS NEEDED 5. ROAD SECTION-ASPHALT PAVEMENT: MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED:92% TEST METHOD REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:OSHO TM 306 FREQUENCY OF DENSITY TESTING OF AGGREGATE BASE:6 TESTS MINIMUM'AVERAGE DENSITY FULL TIME INSPECTION OR SPOT CHECKING OF COMPACTION:SPOT 6 UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL: BENEATH PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK) MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED FOR BEDDING:90% MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED FOR PIPE ZONE:90% MINIMUM PERCENT COMPACTION REQUIRED ABOVE PIPE ZONE:95% TEST METHOD REQUIRED TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM DENSITY:T419 DIFFERENT REQUIREMENT FOR PVC:NO IN LANDSCAPE AREA 85% ADDITIONAL NFORMATIOWCOMMENTS: 'WHEN USING NUCLEAR GAUGE,TWO READINGS AT EACH SITE.THE SECOND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE FIRST.THE TWO READING WILL BE AVERAGED TO OBTAIN TEST DENSITY. GRADING AND PAVING NOTES: • 1. THIS GRADING PERMIT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS FINAL APPROVAL OF SINE GRADING,EMBANKMENT OR STRUCTURAL FILL WORK; IT MERELY PROVIDES FOR INITIATK)N OF WORK AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING CITY APPROVAL OF THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION-DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET. 2. SPREADING OF MLA OR DEBRIS UPON ANY PUBLIC ROAD IS PROHIBITED.THE CITY MAY ORDER STOPPAGE OF WORK TO EFFECT CORRECTIVE ACTION,AT ANY TIME. 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL DUST CONTROL AND DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED AT ALL TIMES.THE CITY MAY ORDER STOPPAGE OF WORK TO EFFECT CORRECTIVE ACTION,AT ANY TIME. 4. EMBANKMENTS OR STRUCTURAL FILLS FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION OR FILLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BUILDABLE LOTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM EXCAVATED MATERIALS ACCEPTABLE TO THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO GRADE IN LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED IT LOOSE MEASURE.EACH LIFT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS OBTAINED BY AASTHOT-180 COMPACTION TEST AND 95%WITHIN 3'OF SUBGRADE. 5. STRUCTURAL FILLS SHALL COMPLY WITH APPENDIX J OF THE 2007 OREGON SPECIALTY COOS.CONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 SHALL BE ACHIEVED BY BENCHING INTO THE EXISTING BANK A MINIMUM OFTEN FEET.IF THE BENCH EXPOSES SAND SOIL AN UNDERDRAIN MUST BE PROVIDED.THE UNDERDRAIN,IF REQUIRED,WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY LAYING NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC,EQUIVALENT TO EXXON GTE 12500,ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE STARTING BENCH,THEN PLACING A SIX INCH LAYER OF 1W-314' DRAIN ROCK AND FINALLY COVERING THE DRAIN ROCK WITH THE NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC.SUCCESSIVE BENCHES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH VERTICAL FILL BETWEEN TWO TO FIVE FEET AND BE COMPACTED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 8 INCHES.EACH 8-INCH LAYER SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT AASHTO T-180 DENSITY.THE FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED Si AT FINISH GRADE.NO ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL EXCEEDING A 12-INCH DIAMETER SHNLL BE ALLOWED IN THE STRUCTURAL FILL 8 THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE,BY THE CONTRACTOR.OF STARTING BENCHWORK TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR AN UNDERDRAIN LAYER AND TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. 7. THE CITY SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S REPORT/RECOMMENDATION CHANGES. 8. IF SPRINGS OR GROUND WATER ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE SOILS AND CIVIL ENGINEERS OF THE CONDITIONS FOUND AND COORDINATE HIS ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT WILL ALLOW THE ENGINEERS TIME TO REVIEW THE STTUAT1ON AND PREPARE A PLAN TO PROPERLY MITIGATE THE WATER ENCOUNTERED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE SOILS ENGINEER TAKE COMPACTION TESTS.A MINIMUM OF THREE TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH 2 FEET OF FILL IX.EXCAVATOR MUST COMPLY WITH ORS 757.541 THROUGH 757.571 (UTILITY PRE-NOTIFICATION,ETC.). 11. PROJECT GRADING LIMITS SHALL BE ALL PROPERTY LINES AND STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN.THE BOUNDARIES OF CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMNS SHALL BE PERMITTED.FLAGGING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 12 WET WEATHER CONSTRUCTION:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION FOR RECOMENDATIONS. 13.STRAIGHT GRADES SHALL BE RUN BETWEEN ALL FINISH GRADE ELEVATIONS AND/OR FINISH CONTOUR LINES SHOWN,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14.ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE FINISH SURFACE ELEVATIONS,INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF STRIPPINGS,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.ALL AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE'TO BE STRIPPED OF ALL TOPSOIL AND ORGANIC MATERIALS,AND REPLACED AFTER COMPLETION OF STRUCTURAL GRADING AS DIRECTED. 16.THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DONE IN CONSULTATION WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 17.ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT NO STEEPER THAN TWO(2)HORIZONTAL TO ONE (1)VERTICAL UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. IS.CONTRACTOR TO HAVE SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF COMPACTION TESTS PERFORMED TO MEET THE CRY OF TIGARD REQUIREMENTS AT THE DEVELOPERS EXPENSE.TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED TESTING AGENCY AND WRITTEN RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BOTH THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF TIGARD SHOULD COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS NOT BE MET,CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-COMPACT THE FILL AND PAY ALL ADDITIONAL TESTING COSTS. 1A.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL CATCH BASIHIS,CLEANOUTS,VAULTS,ETC.THAT ARE AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ANDIOR FILL TO FINISH GRADE.STORM DRAIN INLET STRUCTURES STRUCTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO WATER FLOWS INTO THE STRUCTURE WITHOUT PONDING WATER. 20.ALL DIRT SPOILS FROM STREET,PUBLIC UTILITY,FOUNDATION,AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DISPOSED OF,HANDLED,OR STORED OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINES OF THE REMAINING TREES. 21.ALL WET WEATHER CONSTRUCTION MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DIRECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER N ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRY OF TIGARD STANDARDS. 22.ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT MIX SHALL BE DESIGNED FROM A MIX FORMULA APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR MATERIAL USED.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEER AND CITY WITH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FROM ASPHALT PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 23.THE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT MIX SHALL BE COMPACTED PER THE CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TEST RESULTS TO THE ENGINEER AND CITY. MISC.UTILITIES: 1. ELECTRICAL.TELEPHONE GAS,AND T.V.SERVICE SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 2. UTILITY TRENCHES ARE TO BE DUG.UTILITY CONDUIT IS TO BE PLACED,UTILITY TRENCHES ARE TO BE BACKFILLEO,VAULTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND TRANSFORMER PADS ARE TO BE POURED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER ELECTRICAL,TELEPHONE,GAS AND T.V.SERVICE PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. STORM DRAINS: 1. ALL STORM DRAIN CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE TEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.ALL RAIN DRAINS OR FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE PIPED OR CONNECTED TO A DRAINAGE SYSTEM.DRAINAGE BLOCKOUTS SHALL BE PLACED IN CURBING FOR THOSE LOTS ONLY INDICATED ON THE PLANS.BLOCKOUTS ARE TO BE LOCATED 5 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINES. 3. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS W EASEMENT AREAS. 4.STORM SEWER PIPE,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.SHALL BE PVC PER ASTM D3034(SON 35). 5.BACKFILL MUST BE COMPACTED TO A DENSITY OF 95%PER AASHTO T-99 IN PAVED OR STRUCTURAL FILL AREAS.MINIMUM COMPACTION IN UNPAVED OR NON-STRUCTURAL FILL AREAS IS 90%. B.STORM DRAIN ONES SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR AND TESTED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CLEAN WATER SERVICES. TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED NCLUDNG BACKFILUNG AND COMPACTION OF BASE ROCK THE DEFLECTION TEST AS DESCRIBED IN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION MANUAL-OREGON CHAPTER IS REWIRED.ALL STORM SEWER LINES WILL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO DOING ANY TESTING OR VIDEO TAPING. 7. THE ENDS OF STORM DRAIN SERVICE LATERALS OR PIPE STUBS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A ONE PIECE YX4'MARKER EXTENDING A MINIMUM 12'ABOVE THE GROUND WITH THE END PAINTED WHITE.ATTACH MAGNETIC TAPE ALONGSIDE THE 2X4 MARKER(SEE DETAIL 290-ST). 8.NOTIFY CITY OF TIGARD INSPECTOR 48-HRS.PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WON. a. 4 • GENERAL NOTES 1Q M9M0 AR K Abpiy• 04115 OOM9LL9•1N k OM NO AR14519MA NW=w No E aw we wml w bs gw N 5 N DESCRIPTION O SHEET C101 JOB Na 1095-01 I 109511C101Ap 3 Q) Q) I- O a_ a w U) J z 0 z 0 U , , \_ _H 1 1 B 67 • 2 VIA 1 GRAPHIC SCALE y m e a >d a (IN FEET) U;I \ I 1 •- 20 FT Y j : 1� yyy R.d.Id a ' I KEYNOTES 01 o. 1.1111416. I ` O INSTALL NLET PROTECTION. 1 SEE DETAIL SHEET C104. ''4 I I ' (, O INSTALL SEDIMENT FENCE SEE DETAIL SHEET CI06. Z I I I ' O3 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURES O O I �_ __ —_— I O6AWCUT LNE w_ I OS REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT O 4 I,i I I i%= I 1I O REMOVE EXISTING STRIPING } I p REMOVE EK/STING TREE ^ Z ` ' I 8O REMOVE EXISTING FENCE x D Z FI (n i 1 I '17;� ( 1 ' p9 REMOVE EXISTING CURB W O J 11 ' 11 I 11 I 10 REMOVE EXISTING STORM LINE Z z a I 1 © 17 PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREE 0 Q O I , / I ' d - 12 REMOVE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TREE i 0 Z CC I / ' I 17 MODIFY EXISTING FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE. Z I= Z I ' ; BEE DETAIL SHEET C104 • O ,..........A01 i 1 J 1 l � _ �_ = _—— `.�. 1 0 !A I � �� I I o O �� , I moo' o I ` w \M I 0 r �� \14.,�`iq 1 Z O,:\•I :7� ' q , O Ali := --� i , ;4 i ill ; I- O �,-_-�0 ....,..... itk It, • 1\ .i .:, 1 \ \ \ I j Q ♦ � 1* 4 i %r + O ° I 3 I• 0 , . \ .0 ":01 „4 � � Z 1 \ . \ : 00 ra•--r4=..... ... .■ i■ , I, I (c.--?4,5). ''''',9, \IINtiowi‘ © 0 o ® a �_ C;, (n 1 rINO �t_r __ .. - I i/ c I1��r� =OMNE 10 t1O911 of= � AN0: ncwt,tr 1 = == � ; usrolt�I I ' _ 1I Iv � �� /j ji%II�i►��`O cn Ir ��► Adirr-- i Air . tic,,,, - g o it I e lik 0 Alt____.- J/�' —0 0�0�0 . ..I- • 0 r 1 1\ 0. \ t I N r DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN g o -J us Q SCALE:1. 0'HORIZONTAL - W Z SHEET O C102 3Z J08 N°1095-011 10 t aS \ A, .-,.... il 1 1 V § ---- V.. 6)\.i. i 1\ , GR.A0. SCALE, .... 0 \ \ \ 1 (NFEET) �I' \ \ 1 I . 20FT frE5 .. e2 l 1 1 1 % ` ' KEYNOTES { ` 1 1 7O INSTALL LYNCH TYPE CATCH BASH.SEE DETAIL SHEET C104 1 I 1 I1 O FACILITY CONSTRUCT WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION Q 1 1 11 O9 INSTALL RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION.SEE O_ w . ,III, 70=167.93 - —--r —- _- DETAN.SHEET C194. //1 187.90 • AC=167.43 _ V/ ��167.43 A. 187.40 1� __ _ 1 1 1 1 � r< 1 1 1 Q 0 ' sp \ � Z•I 1 , •4' Tc=18801 I ■ z - a ACr16 LP'3S 1 AC=167.51 1 \ I t I- 0 Q w TC=166. 1 111\\\, II II } 1 O ,. Z (7 AC=167. 1 / 1 I? 'J Z Z ,'�� Tc=167.53 ns _ d _ rc=16 RT t Ac-167.03 nc Tae 47(EXIST) 1 1 TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION: •• 2 0 g Ad ,TOO 67.49 ,66.99 'I Y i t .6 1 PSUACE, ..„� ,�• sTti ' , 1 1 1 1 TC=167.24 Ili� ��i� `�� i i 1 ACe186.74) �l �`1�r% 1 /<��1 I _. MATCH a1ST 1 , LL_ ,i �� 17.....• ' AC=1':.36 1 SUBGRAOE Q Ilk =167.16 TC=1 13 i 1 J�p2 9 ACr .8.63 1 i 1 I-' TC=167.491 ' '(s1q . �1�11! i 1 AC=166.99, 1`1 „ ....\,1I a�ST 1 1 , ,„ k 1 \ _er aii;1144 AC=167.04 AC=1” ` \Ii4 ' �1 , I A `\ , 0 s -...,_TCr188.02 , 187.60 ' TC=1:: •68.01 'D , I Q i `1 irf ACr187.52 ` 187.10 A16 y�8,7.51 _ ,0 1 1 Z , ` �'e 4 wl .— 7C 87.34 ©8`IE _ © �1 1II ; 1 , 1 ' ( 163.08 1 1+ • 116-L S AO=1::.84 EXI _�L •∎ N ', 1 Vi I �� eel t,, ;1 a�'1ei jo �, , wr5><em1 X551 r w1a�� 4111111Map,, MATCH �1i �u1,,1«�r.;,1 �...,=a i EXIST '�-LlK�� /�� 1 i I�i� • . u,.1a r/ � ` 3 tr L�r.��eua,,.. .ii , . c��,, 1 5 o � 1j I I `• 1 �` t 1• ■t...■—...444 — . A 0,41---- < __ __ __ It! ,. _,...........„_ ___ __.__ ,..=: s ■ GRADING PLAN vs a Q SCAT F:1.20'HORCONTAL IC Z SHEET O JOB NO. &o 1095-011 E O 10551,C1050q T •4 Ns1;' ; ."N\'■/ `■ \ Z i g§■ o, ■ \ \ ♦♦ s,I c¢ O. • titi / / '' ♦ \ , °.3 ■ a�'�?17' ♦ \'y H Z k ���o` // �r °gib \ \ ♦♦ Si. ? g g Jv 0r f ♦ \ O W F- UNDEVELOPED F+.� . 5`� / 'J' +J' '� ♦ o +`. / <40. '52.04- ■ \ ■ w �: AREA °< /0 ♦ 7,550 SQ.FT. / .�N j// of E T. ■ \ 3 •• Z = 3 z =z //a.,J�.,N,\♦♦ // 12 `;T. © \ \ ♦♦ 1.4°. a\ Q ` ST. ® ♦ / BOA! / ® O,' , •\ ♦ // , x \. / ,II O \ \ .$N -, / ' i >< l / r� / . er ►; Q + \ ':° 'E-5►'IPEP I \ \ O E ■ / KEY NOTES: .6 4 \`�¢ TAX LOT • / I Z,..„) �,, O� f �'*' 6 T`fti 1600 / 3 /I —� N Q U O SFI POIN1fOR � s 7,74, E O m SPACES(Q ® ,'�,,LJ; 2 // IT Z Co NEW s1DEwN% ; '\ `5". %. �� °' TOTAL + „ // �O, .` U O TO RFMAINYAIx Off�♦ •\ S F-\ \ _ / j O Ce Q // - O /4 ►A 5 JO0 U O CURBRAISFD kit, �lY. \ 1` �t I \ b' © / / I��� // \ Z u • C s. O EX;RNNDCURB ♦ ♦♦ 6 / \� ' Y O O • \ \ NE s "4t6 ° © � IPA % / 3 O O rnxar sIGN LEGEND: ��\ P G O 4 /IV�/ t,/ / / a dS U • e� A O., 0 ...,o, I �� / d Z N O PAAgNG-SIGN ♦ - \\ JJD.O _ TA 700 T 1 I f-h�•d. / / \ W r1-,:', 7'L-OVER- >o NEw IWSED HANG ,� � j, � /� ? / // < Q Z O [ROSS WAD( �'�- \\S BD,... \ �� *G ;�0�i;;. / // / \ O O S/RIPE /► O NEW BARACADE \♦ '\ ,.O / 74. ' 'A / / \ V 0 I"'- RRNMNG ISRIAND o 6 '�J. / + / .�.4 Oq. \ < Z i0 f%IST.DRIVFWAV 6 WAIL ~ \\ N'\♦ •\\ E (`C4D' JJ, / 'BIO~� '/ \ N�.". (/) 4100 TO RfAWNMA I 4� \ '� ,- [f ` vV�I u E%IST.SWALE TO CURB I kix ` '• 0 + / C� ` / . EXISTING it REN CURB SIRIR� ^ O4L.1, `� \ ' \ /1'8-DYER-I F°'/�� ♦ • , /O `� / ' FIELD ELD ARIX DATE DESCRIPTION it =ITED HANG 4f IS•-0- 1 D"Co`-o ♦'\ tam \\ / \tl / FIELD _ =IT NP. N�46.e' ,\ \.. ♦ /� y / E%151_SMER 1J PARKING TO REMAIN CG. ..�i / M' p ' NEW TRfE "4„ I ' „- 11 ISLAND STRIPE F. ♦ ` vy''„¢y IS �� 0 /0 / / �_ DEDICATION II •/ �tSA� /O' f 14. I ♦m ,' '��f%IST_IARGF PEXIDEROSA f /16 PINE YfY.LOUIKM BEfORF ///4 ' ' DATE:06.10- 7 DEMO EJUST. _ _ ,09: 211279 Q SPEED .- •-,,L - 17 � b. £ �� /I , FILE: A100 DE7,(,). I.sr:, L 0 O /��,/I 0 / , SAWN: DR I le cuae�aEPlncEwTNEw / CHECKED: DR W slDEwnlx a CURE .A�� / OJ O RRNNING WALL- = 19 BIDDFR DESIGN , *Ok j- :00„. /• COPYRIGHT ANKRCIM MOISAN // ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS ISAN 0 TURN AROUND AREA / PAR / G /� PARKING SW GRANT iA¢¢¢?Z(E NEW 6R.WOOD /' % / PARKING LOT 2 21 FFNCE & / Z == FENCF6R ' ® SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN , / SITE DEV. giz f PLAN uo}7 E%IST.S fi.WOOD / / / m =T FfNCE \ / / _ _ ENSI.SPLIT MAI ' /11 ffNCETOREA4NN i / Al .00 ' la CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION HI -- w S EXISTING PAVEMENT DIG OUT REPAIR SAW CUT OR GRINDING • 5 Q ANGLE FILTER FABRIC ' r I FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL IS TRAPPED f l F 0 / i(• `;' • l . I'RESIN FOR BAG REMOVAL Fr-I U .000 oeo°e+ ,...- op•' 'i ' �l„ I f 1r/R• 00o a AB o 00 De° AGGREGATE BASEROCK .- 4• CATCH BASED GRATE • 12.•_ U]H, u des II III=1 II-1''- COMPACTED SUBGRAOE 1::14 - INTERLOCKED �• WEaii P°��j�pi �' 2"><2'POSTS ..�� ��������������������n�����1 O LAk01 CATCH : r4r4•4w70�-r�e+17�� o -- _ AND ATTACH PLAN VIEW �.�`4�.�`4�.�`�`��� gg LOCAL STREETS: ENDS O SACS .,44.441vere+4* EXPANSION RESTRAINT z mu AC - 6" CLASS"C" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, o�AP°TPKAL a'minimum USE STITCHED LOOPS 4+44+4$4,, W maC OVER 2"=2'POSTS NOTES: s, .d0.4" ~� AB 4" (1-1/r 0")AGGREGATE BASEROCK tr«n toe dope. • t �IRr BDrTDU aF Fn.TVI FABRIC 6• 1•..�•- �19..VirOYi:47 OR PLAN VIEW VERTICALLY BELOW FINISHED GRADE. .*+$140 '� 2. 2•.2•OR.PINE OR STEEL '-:..e *kr AC - 6'CLASS "C' ASPHALTIC CONCRETE Nts �*I.... FENCE POSTS. STORM PIPE 14 z 3. POSTS TO BE INSTALLED CM O MINOR COLLECTOR STREETS: ,•e„` �`' UPULL 90E OF SLOPE ......:• i \ , .-M \ 4. COMPACT BOTH SIDES OF FILTER rAatc O AC - 7" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, ''t'� U NYC (PEN is .'' Li AB - 4" (1-1/2" - 0") AGGREGATE BASEROCK - BI°RLTJ2 BAG 5. PANELS MUST BE PLACED (.1") 12 -I ACCatDNC 10 SPACREC ON O OR I' I:,y +,N. PROFILE 0ETAA HO.940 ':i:?� H/s 2-X2'%3:"RUBBER BLOCKS 7 AC - 9" CLASS'C' ASPHALTIC CONCRETE Ise<%'" .::T`:•_ ..II POLYPROPLENE L .,+•: ::.:::j y;:.•:+:j.:!L''.' is FILTER SACK(WOVEN) (- MAJOR COLLECTOR STREETS: £%: #;':#`•'`' I. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL z ?;:4::},r}:;rX'.`:;.'•D::::y::F � 36"VIDE ROLLS AC- 9' CLASS•'C" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, N itt; 4;:;?:;;i f ;:};y' ;i C' p, AB- 4'(1-1/2" - 0") AGGREGATE BASEROCK PROFILE < •>.;.;;<•;'::•3r:`>••.'.;<:•k:,ss>.x.,. WOVEN POLYPROPLENE SACK 14" `lli�//Ii :✓llif!!/I;t%f o NOTES: NOTE: I I I I z I.BIG BAGS ONLY REQUIRED WHEN - U 6'MAXIMUM SPACING LI FOR FURTHER INFORMAMIN NOTE. 1. JOINTS TO BE TACK AND SANDED. DISCHARGING SEDIMENT LADEN WATER. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON OKSC CRITERIA SEE 1. RECESSED CURS INLET CATCH BASINS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION O O W SEE ON DESIGN CRITERIA SEE FRONT VIEW CHAPTER 4 OF CLEAN WATER MUST BE BLOCKED WHEN USING FILTER CRAMER 4 OF CLEAN WATER 2. ASPHALT PLACED IN MAX.3'UFTS EACH COMPACTED TO 92%NIA. 2.STAKING OF BAGS REQUIRED CHAPTER 4 OF CLEAN WATER SEANCES EFOSON PREVENTION FABRIC INLET SACKS. SIZE OF FILTER SEANCES EROSION PREVENTION WITH EITHER METHOD USING(2) uDSE CMEEROSI N PREVENTION NIS PL SEDIMENT O DESIGN MANUAL. FABRIC INLET SACKS TO BE DETERMINED AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 0 = 3. SAWCUT SHALL BE SAC COATED WITH BITUMINUS ASPHALT EMULSION. 1's 2"WOOD STAKES DR APPROVED MANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL ELY MANUFACTURER PIANMNC AND DESIGN u4NUAL. Z In EQUAL PER BAG. • J CD ( INLET PROTECTION n Q OUTLET PROTECTION Ri NO SCALE RIP RAP 'C'1eanWater Services SEDIMENT FENCE Clean Water Services TYPE 5 CleanWater Services Q LW AGUSTIN P.DUENAS ..,<.mmlimevi i,eiw.. ow eemmAlmmel.clew. •vr s.mm41acot it.lw i. ®MONFNAwO pEPATNE1If rmom PAVEMENT DIG-OUT DWD.NO. Detail Drawing 820 REVISED 12-06 DRAINING NO.875 REN4D 12-06 DRAVANC NO.920 REVISED 12-OB 0 IRIS 11.4a WRI.MYR CITY or ioARD '�(wf.°1i.-13i -- JULY tool AND REPAIR 1 82 M,a d -- ~ Q 0 Q rx Li_ cp 0 Re STANISS STEEL WAN CP CAME ATTACH.TO OW.PLATE AND • STRUCTURE AS APPROVED.OHLA OR CABLE >- AT.SHALL BE 9MLL BE SMALL ENDOW TO ALLOW ORIFICE ADJUST RIM •uNW� HATE TO BE REMOVf0 FROM WOE F I- RATE AND wKS TO BE MANUFACTURED r^ U FROM A'TOPE OI 5.STAPXESS STIR. v T0=165.11 °III (EXIST)RIM• =� 16306 STORM EVENT ELEV. SIZE UNI1 N DANDE NM _` .w VVQ 16'2.80 040 D.390 W _ A11CC MM MARIAN WATER SURF EMI.=165.11 2' ( 4 2•INMAN 2 YEAR 164.12 3.20 FRAME GR4TE yyyyyy rpr t0 YEAR 164.65 2.80 28"x26" C.I. GRATE a SID.DTA Oro IrFS w.P.w • 25 YEAR 164.99 4.00 AA aw,I:E SEE SEE TABLE W/BICYCLE BARS ^J o II I �� =182.88 MICE ELEVATOR CF SPACER RCgAPED Fors C.I. OUTLET 2� ._+Z66'r. n Al.MEAT a a9rrL TO SRM1E CRIMES PROVIDE 4"0 +��5 �y MIC D VAT C.I. X C.I. COUPLING -� C.O. AT TRAP * N F STORM SERER UN ITai.t '`� EERNCO 1056 OR w RA mo ��, � �A, T ' APPROVED EQUAL ��� qg� w �'ORA 910 N,,0 , , A410101 TD r41 TERN I "-I-�u Put TwaU ss.vr Z �$� P ' °aAis a r�wl:Jaw r V2'MA.w. C.I. 45'BEND :� {� z ��- `�� .�IIANa AND nAE•E>a .-�, E.tw. Td• aADE 41 .3.A E maliARRR ND On).vo EXIST 8• u ANCHOR.n'•"R'OF s °U�' C.I. DISCHARGE RESE aumE ARE nW Rnarc a IE<t8z.71 '' r O D O PIPE (TYP.) IN-FEE';AV S N.M..um DWI WIN'rz"A MN.lb,• .i r•� it LR+WN ADS N-12 OR - -8.. e•1 -.1 APPROVED > L A,::. / ! I.E. SHOWN =a, Nalans. - EQUAL DEFLECTOR ON PLAN a) SECTION A-A �// CLAMP DETAIL /off 11 jj�� AMOR.4• EWAL p 21.L �W CV 'aIm O lDiT'_f DA«�BTm pi ADS N-12 X C.I. \ COUPLING FERNCO CA 1070 OR APPROVED EQUAL N=) ( • PLATE WDE 91AM flT STOP NOTES: \ 5-•PA.4ENNNAES DAZE AND.111/DE BOOM CNANEL p O I. CONNECTING PIPE THAN TEE CHO BE 6',OR 8"ANNA C-goo OR AS1M 3034 PVC,AND °f CE CO"L" °AOE C.I. BAND CLAMP 24" SO. 10 GA. OR F PIE SIZE LARGER THAN THE ORIFICE OPENING. \ I" PLATE INTERIOR a I 3. MAXIMUM ORIFICE OPENING MALL BE I DIAMETER. 3. STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD DRAWING NO.390,400 RAFT. \ NOTf C.I. 45'BEND & EXTERIOR COATED ° 4. FRAME AND GRATE SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD DRAWING NO.400,DITCH INLET FRAME r Ulf.1•1.0 CawanE FOR MULTIPLE ORIFICE ANNX:ATION W/ ASPHALT PAINT o a_ AND GRATE. ARa¢a PIMPS 6,2 OR A r MIN.SPACER Is RECUPED AS 5. PLATE AND WIDE SHALL BE SECURED RUSH AGAINST WALL OF STRUCTURE AS APPROVED. APP...MU, SNOW SPACER TO MATCH PLAT_WIDE (LYNCH CO. TYPE OR 0_ 6. MAINTAINAHCE ACCESS R£OURED TO WITHIN 10 OF CENTER OF BOTH STRUCTURES. WL1.'_X-Dom¢ E� MTH A NAT WORT MAX.., 7. FOR APPROVAL OF ALTERNATE STRUCTURES SEE SECTION 1.17. VIN A wA110 TIGHT SEA. APPROVED EQUAL) Q OUTFLOW CONTROL ORIFICE PLATE LYNCH CATCH BASIN DETAIL 0 STRUCTURE 0ISV9 E Services AND GUIDE C1eanWater Services NOT TO SCALE g W DRAWiNC NO.720 RENRO.R-O6 4H.w.,dlR+d R.N. REVISED 12-06 O•IFE.FE....o FON. Z 0 J DRAWING N0. 730 O S Q LEg z - SHEET - O 0144 �l- JOB NO. z 1 095-01 I B 0 1095110103 004 / / / ‘\, N \ / _W \\ / m 11/♦ \ q. ` a s 5,1 /9'R \ � Z z S $ ' \ j ` .VS \ © / • , Q S . V) o d a >I \c° \,„ / / 4,N% ST, N• d O N\ ` ' d �- U■ F' / r O 5" / + S. las PAS.S q ■ z. bJ f \ ° . / Z■ O ° / • / � _ la \ ►.. N. G V 5 E I ■ I -9; ' \V os '.4'4 )<1( Z V o< / 4� / \fit ` / \� \�� \ d d / a \ / / / d K. y \ 0.0_1-- � \\. TAX LOT 'CS. 3 / q / Q/ we\ 600 B'Efj b. KEY NOTES: \�\\ SPO'. �� 2 / ;/ s 'O ►s ® Z < O SIDEWALK / \� SPACE$(C) © / / ° �// / o ° • X Z A TOTAL . / ///// d ° •'' q LJJ 2•\ O RAISED Cyte \ '\ N / _ / /��J<4 / //1 °\' \\1 \ O FT.R(S ASRI et ' DRIVE WAV `` •\ �•,\ / :/// V"�� ® // J'/ / / t•F \ V O ti ° a ►• O hrl.WOOU FENC7 ` \ " ../ / / \ \ °\ O•LEGEND: w • j, y:r,.'/ i d/ CL 3 2 O s n.wood rENa \ TAX LOT 0 " / /\ �/ / H 021 Z U l Er V 1700 / ► • !:/ n ♦ Z w OAr1.WOODaNI —w— OVFRNFADPOWFR \` \ /• , / , \. j \ O In O 'NO PARNINC'SIGN p SANITORV SEWTR / ` 4 \\ ./• ® �\ !! �` / / 7�! / Z O O O UDINEAEDBSIGNS —O— STOIDASEWER \\ \`� .� .;Sk\ \\ / `/ d / / EXISTING `° V <� Z / i .; / / BASEFIELD U Q Q 10 IARGEPONDEROSARM . WATER / \`\• • \11 \ d / / FIELD U /° / /1(3 /1 11 SPEID BUMP —.� GAS \'\ , /� / \ K.AkK DUlL DESCRIPTION• V /' 12 STREET PARKING —. . / /��d: U ° / / _ EFNCI II.i o Ii SWAIE —• • - FENTE W/GATE 'S/ o O '• .•id,./ /1 / c Id f.SIC11 BASIN ®` /2 F%fjb.� � ./ / / / / 1 I S POWER POLE �1 . I / /•. 16 EIGIIT PIXE O 0 I dO / / ./ 9 • UATE:0610-09 / O A \ / / 108: 211279 Q �•,. ///////\ / ` FILE: P.200 �e A:II,I . PAIRTfCING DR ~Of J. W a_. / ��/ L•6T /4 i /�, , / \ `/ ASSOCIA ED ARCHITECT 2S. 00.,4. • 1 / /�. . ,\ / \� `/ PARKINGN OT a' Q/ / EXISTING x EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN �/ Yg! A2.00 1•-IB'-o ® F+, / / /� ` CONDITIONS iTT II o / d , / A2.00 of .. / // \ \ 8 CO II' IONAL'CJSE APPLICATION r ,/ y••y .,yam • / x 1 ` a i.•" { � t� /-� � j e / i. /...„...1/4,/ . —, / ,. , J "• Z z a • .. '•, / �e �; S. t 4%,,,x..k! /..,,f. . ....,,,,,,:"...:... .---...•:..•••....i.:'::.°:-:.Jill"� !. E I WORK ' "�E: �` G !'''''.!<a:5 • ,� { Teti, °•• � '' Z i 6NS■\4„. :' i ".„ --■sl. I', *r• ) 7 NY* r„, .... .1 \ t: '.. , .. ... • aNNI .:•';'••••:..... ...•::•::•.• 11711 fit. FIN., '':::..;T-..::,:' 'NUITTS.:,.. ::c 'MI, , .., .21,0,1:. . ,.. '{ �'• f "' `. s s I •� ;- _ III w v ew . �� t , x p. 0 ..{•� , R • 1 EN:: .:Ik' /', St. ANTHONY'S Y�` `` r vi " � , ` ' / `' { �SOL &CHURCH _ Z cc rte i f'/!/J ` `�♦ I $ + + z .I.' 410,.1c,...4:_tH •:\„ „..../ 00,/ 1 I. I..-- Ill t- - - 1 I \ i_u 2 •.;-;,• iii; .-48/.• • • •: .... e "0 I '11 iVir\ C ' s''''''' '. j } 1\r' ba V =. • ., 1411 ..,: '. ..' ,.0/ , - - .. ...— . L. ' ' ..• .4 T ...,, .e. :, ■ . :.-,,,,...::., ,.cwt x3 r,, � It Q Q"' z --..",-‘‘‘. „,)... .,. • +'1 ! .Rye` .� # b , ' Cn 1— v~i ..,..... .__, -, :Z c, ; I .T/k� Dl DESCRIPTION f R-12 CB D --rte rte, "r _ <[...-.� a z S R. +�•• r ¢ $ \ ,: - s DATE:061609 ' '' J V _ Q , + T - '� 108: 211279), ERE: LMG -mot {" II. .. a •• r_c g� DRAWN: DR n� ' 41 -. ■C ' 4 +r�„ [:HkCRkIY OR• 4. • -� « .y TN IF r lw �#� COPYRIGHT ANKROM M06lIN >iik.N. \ y* ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS Mae x� - ` 1 ° a,.E' SW GRANT „o s e 1•° ' VICINITY Mf'1Y'rr s' _ ,'IDx R-2..q1 PARKING LOT { a VICINITY Z II r-�so 1 ,"i E` t MAP o„, 1 x :II + ''` R, ' - CONOIIINIONAL USE APPLICATION L m. I.•d4I i.,' Qi i';..4.1',-..-, `_ 0 G PLANT . , .■am LDi i y ;u�° PLANE LIST 41Ai�4JALITY 5444LE ATBFFS in RruAN Y PROTECT 5711 LAIN NWE/Common N . SIZE SPAOING IT STM LATIN NME/Common Name SIZE SPACING S w-.�lu w - (S..cone Dome numbered Irv..on LaaOoNe plan) GQWNDCO'.ER a PERENNALS WEILAND PLANTS ° ,• �.JI \'.'�--- • muse 7 a294 OO HMI c 1 rr+ r - .' 216 WU ARCTOSTAgtttOS UVA-VR uASS- I qd. 3'ac 590 CO CAREX CONUPTA Samoa 6 per At T A� I DAMN REDWOOD 3' COCO Ma..eelwwtts ItimbmnKL V . 2 ROOM CHERRY {.25'/25' Woo 110 COE COTOIEASIER OAFMERI'EIa1dY 1 qol. 4'as 590 .P J,IGJS PATENS Bunroel 6 per e1 E, R f 3 RED MAPLE 3.25- GOOD ENha7 Cota neoeter Rush 4 RED MAPLE 275' GOOD 23 PAL PEN/45E1011 ALOPECtRODES'UTI E B 1 Sprawling 590 SIT Small- I W ButRPIIS Bar«aol 6 p«of 5 RED MAPLE 25' LI1W Burst),Gear/roa,te.n tray �. Y ac Small-MAW Bi•uM N GDS w 0 z 6 RED MAPLE 1.75' POOR E- • z u 7 noota NG BERRY 2.5' POOR SHRUBS SHRUBS x .14. Q z 01 9 P0IQEEROSSA PINE 3Y GOOD 45 MA MAHONA AOUE0U I 1 gel. 3'ads. 23 CS COM4JS Y16r1A 1 g /'L'hl. 4'nt C..3 0.J < 2 g Oregon Grape Roderic Do9'e•ed Ix N — J O et 39 NOG Gull Stream Mamba CA'GULF STREW' 2 9a1. 3'as 26 PC SOS CAPITANS I 901./2'hl. 4'as • O a &li 81 YTS Splits L BOUg1ET' 5 gel. 4'a.r_ 25 SD I I got./1.5'Al 4'nu MI, O K 1'- O 00- TREES TREES ,3i LIT TI I 8 AC ACER O CRIA1UH 2 901./2'hL A.Caen r.-) • • W N a Km O Cl II FPP FRAXMU5 PE . PATYORE' Y c . A.sheen e Maple H Patm«.AYn T ft fFRRAXPIUs u11FOLIA 2 40./3'ht. A..ho.n _ C 2 a _� 11 cep GOO=awBA-PRINCETON SENTRY' 2'w. A.Mi... Ash C� G C Prns.ton Sentry Moidsnher tree Z 0 Y 0 l7 4 CRAM PLASTIC smeW 0 `FENCING TO PROTECT; SI caotxacovLR n 61;' Q CC C to /A MONO 1EGETATION / 00 (�/ 01 ,!t\ • 4196TH p\ f (SEE OUALI7O CRASS ETA SEFD MIX LL o — BARBERRY MIN % r' f ( (SEE SPECS FOR DUALS) 'z ''..-u- c1 EoOSDNC 19-VT$ 5901 I i w Ln W n WA/SOAPING 591-JP W E" z '-.1 ; I a ® .,..�� Ave x' To REMAIN 590-7., WATER awn �' i C E305TR1G wow=SIERBS 1D BE ORA55 SID / N o a r CWS PLANT CALCULATIONS: �► ROOTED OR wANSPLANIED BACK INTO / t•x IN 'E I /�. �' � � �a'pF 13-vTS sMAlRAF7F71,C05TRIA 11N r POSSreLE !' SIDE SLOPES ) Total Swale Area= 1.782 s.f. ¢ M1 4-q \ � �., 9. 23 C$ 1 ° ExE7pG 7REE5 s Vii Mkt 4-AUU 25-$D a fRQReDCOtER To REMAIN. Treatment Area= 295 s.f. o W (,,e 110-CDC ,,.-�°� 26-PC i �' REPLACED OUNDCOVRUCnaN. Plu TsT t. ��� 5-1JA e °•y+' \ 7-AUU, 11-AUU i' <n,.#�C Plugs Propos d(6 P 770 f) = 1.770 - to o.�`•. 15-NDG �IC t %�� -NOG io'-.� 7-FL o. 0 r yjl,, e _� Freeboard Areo= 1487 s.f. 7p llth a� 1. % Trees Required (Area x .00= 15 0 `!.� 4-AUU 43-AU 'ORANOE PlAS1K N. `�.�,,. r �; � � it-FPP �� SNOW FENOIG to Trees Propgosed=(I S ) �� 41�j :ARx Muu PROTECT oas \ Shrubs Re wired Area x .05= 74 per AL VEGETATION '"\ ,`ere,. >, 5-NOG TEN L ■ 5-PAL: ■ Shrubs Proposed= 74 z � ` ; ��' r� PAL n'4p, ••8 Existing Dogwood Shrubs may be Q Q 30'�13_p. ids}p,�� \ �\ used towards meeting the shrub requirement•' ., 4 1 4-A•M I III�h re°4lf�,� e Al.:: 4�00011ie,'- 6'IETAL wEE PROniOnON \ + X Z ^pt 71-AUU 1{h�L�eoilpl FENCING w 'CONSTRUCTION TONE. LLI 29-VTS .+' fAOa� ": - RE,pLACE 7REE5 tRnt u1o' I— _• e yRR1ET 1 (n N : \ /DAMAGED AND artsFmUCTCN. O ��•/0 ;�,;,nag{ ► TREE TD /r METAL_ -� !:�40 000.,18n1!'� "'r in = 6'PROIECTxN 0 T IP'NP' METAL TREE / fxYPpll NOTFS• Z U 0 FEFlc.hc '`,t,i, PROTECTION X T.C ntramm M to verily a.pant quanutl.. I BARK MULISH .--.0--7-Z, 0 • ;p •i \ 2.MINT plantings Al the geld aea...«y. - 0 J 9 61-Al `r �\ i Pointe let 1aa�.w R.I.6.h..9med by m autemp110.ans.vaod UT -7 DOING TREE its '. system. Retreat ede1M yetem to mends A,.0..er.9e ke al pent mohair* —J TO REMAN \ \ w a medusa, be de+n/Wild by Lana«.84e Cat/rector.a,«nt».yet.n. (\� j \.\ S 4.AI pleads tre to be fully folbvel,L«iAaap.Contractor Mep..o4.oI.e1 ed0ernerd Cntroc<«0. L1__ 0 • \ main«rwrt«M muq tndsaavw dameged by amelrualbn. U cn Q } ' N. F-O 0 O / f A' #" (//://,.- L-4, soN> DATE DESCRIPTION A 7-17-.,CUP Comma( Row.. / o rj t/9 I c V7 • 1• I S �'-' I ' \ DATE: 7-17-09 • • ..m■ \\\ < _ V VV"- - I n 271279 W • I �' c ' r I FILE: PH TA-L$ } L �� DRANK: EN \,,. ere V �7 I n CHECKED: JLO• \ I T I SSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 2008 r LANDSCAPE /AtN SW GRANT PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE PLAN PLAN 1"=30'-0" L1e0 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION . , ('._,14),,,,„ S' In INF ¢aFCrtTCADONS Po ANTMn ANn nSFMNR , .> ., - _ �•7- W r., ts -:.,. ..a :. : •,Ih- .... IEEE aeovrn(M Pi eel(Per .e, r _ z CaERN: All plats Mal conform to a make.Pandora.of M•tot•e1 edlkn of the'American A.sonotion of Nursryne, SIM PREPARATICIIS Remo.Si nonnative purl•matelot•,nauang pant.root.and weeds pram to oadnq BEFORE CONSTRUCTION: t?-1,11t ....--• . Stanaardi A.N.S...260.1-1873.Meet r exceed ten rpulalione and taus of Federal,Stale.and County regulations,regarding IM teased.. TYI the me-grade n Me are to a depth at al Nast 4'and add at Mist 12'of dean 1.IOMUf nepplbn of pool male..certified as Mere tram ha.emd.Pict•,d•eaw,and noxious weeds,and ceilfied fit la a•n compost-amended topsoil.he carpool mamma lope.Mel how the famine charelensfk•to mime a good Y and mmDer the trees to be protected,verify by mapping ontl/a tagging One note their stze 'f A� 0y wooing medkrn n D.B.H.(Diameter Breast Height),variety,health and structural conditions,review plans. '!" A)Testae-material paw.through I.sae 2.Check with I«d government agencies for bee protection ordinances. The apparent silence of the Specification•end Hen•as to any std.or the apparent anMeon Ran urn of a Staid deeret. B)Fertility-3574 organic matte 3.Leave a protective covering on the sod,i.a,misting groundcowr or mulch. concram my print.Mora be regarded o.mooning that w y the lout..meal',net..N to pawl and mat Oplr material and in me event of Soca Pon godN9,ow-•ecavot.IM sub god.to ensure I2.01 tpso4 con be upped.Ito i 4.Notify dl other contractors that these trees ore to be saved and protected c o mwMn of fen cruebv re to be time A9 ntepr•tonme of thee Specification.Mo.he mode upon the tars mow stale. impacting aurip••air elevations 5.Insto.a temporary 6'night metal no-climb fence to protect the trees and the:root.ptans. 8 ,8 2 N o Lmdecap.contractor end perform a site w+t prior to adding to w+misting conmlbna PREPARATION wale Gudity SeSe area Mal be aver-mcowt•d and feed to Nfal gape non 12'of anrded Install tree partectton sign on fence. Posts located 10•on cent«Os 0 general rule. Fa awry non n c N < Z m S topsoil Tope.amendments Mal be garden ampere.not corned.nd tertian anointment. gpjpI apply diameter of the trunk(OBN)allow up to I loot of radius from the trunk as the protected area - r'� Z a PERFORMANCE DUALITY ASSURANCE:Use adequate numbers of Milled workmen who are thoroughly Vaned and experienced n the t«tiar to the Water Quality Faddy. (Example: 24'D6Hw24'radius of V 1 Q 0 g may horticultural practices and who a•cam Ntel Monitor with the Neil.. W protected root sport r Ideally,we need to protect more Non the tl o p y eqt..mants and m.thde needed for the pops lop zone. The drip zone Into the trunk Is the support moats That had the term up. The roots from a u a pelamanc*of the work of this section. IYiG Plan Inks Made M Petaled helves February 1 d May 1 or between October i and November 15. Bare E-I d I.face Md be nsteued<My Iran December 15 through Apt 15.teen Patna•...the metaled outer.. that via zone out provide nutrition.rater and oxygen. Try to ovoid loss of mad vim 3t1'L of root on rc NOIIf1CA7101b GM Landscape Architect meant/in of 2 sow odvm<e notice of tune for np.atian. 0 0tbn•at gariq M• them lime.additional measure.may be needed to wean erns. any one side. This allows soma enaoechment within the drip Ina Thh should be delemned an a 3 O ( O does not preclude landscape Architect's right of resection of deficient matelots at project Ma Each Pat Idiq to meet the EROSION CO4fef: Craanq,son r•eretian,end seeding•nal be performed during 8.Engineer Dy case dte sign pons a stru urea sod co to sui i to ecd rood os neM get way. w • a, p N above mentioned'Standards'a otherwise fain d apt'de•'Peer etatiwt ad to nacia s and design proposed root structures and construction to ovoid root loss. Bridge typo s t v r q to met the specified requirements O•el form Mall be rejected and rammed of tow now IMm to mnmix•sediment ceded Sits Mlurbmc•moral M minimised ore aeoal*vegetation faundoliona Pan saw major roots i--1 ? O T immediately Ran the premises by the Contractor and of his.men.,and replaced with satisfactory pants r Uwe conforming to mien•..Mere posed•.Slope.Moll b.goaded to support the mladdnent of vegetation. ewe seeding a teed ei...rr..yy T? a I IM specified rmiu:ennenla brown cakd,m appfepfiOts orator 7.How on experienced Arb vial renew landscape Pon to assure the right tree is ponied n the right C-) al IMYin raw deli pennanent gas.Pogrom(a its wpiwl•nl),a Iris wept Mal D.used to place d O,, Z a N vegetation a•uSed t e Bldegrooh n*fabric.(coif.cocosut or approved pt.. proposed.oranges drin'1 kill retuned mature Ire. 0.N I- SIIBSIINTIONS: Orly as approved by Ile LaWSaape Architect a the Owner's Representative. molting(miners-en 1/4'.War.hole)may be used to Pothise ropes aM chanra oettn yen at pulp mar b• 8.Chaok for post and proposed grade and drainage changes,consider the effects t- wed to seam plant pugs In pram sit to discourage floating upon Ywndalkn.No plastic mesh that can entangle 9.Check bees tar etablity. ern n OIIche E ANA REPLACEMENT:All pant material Mali be guaranteed Ran!oral opptance for one full growing proem or ore year, Metre N permitted.Conwl CW9 Chapter 6-Eros Prevention and Sediment Control for additional hformallon. 10.Mnknlre environmental changes. O Mkn•w is longer. During this peed the Conk«tar Mot replace my pall mate...that Is not n good condition ma poWCine A biodpodmA Eros Control Matting Moll be placed over the ipad throughout the sled awe section,fabric 97,n O W 0 o new gosh,(except that material denoted by sm..weather...le nn.der to Owner's negligence.normally miao..p•o liaritie. Mall be held A Pad n aceardae•with the manufacturer•nstMation requirement. 'Jme nigh density cafe DURING CONSTRUCTION: W N K /'�/ d' w of the planless Ste,a last due to vandalism).Guamtm to repot.Ot no cwt to Owner.unecept.•pal material.nth pants matting n IM kwte..am(Geode.Pius or approved egad). n Si othe aloe um few density Jute matting I.Keep equipment off the root system to avoid compaction. Qe1 l4 I._1__ 7 F of ere variety.age.Sze and quality w pant arigndiy Neeifi 4. Conditions of guorantes on repacrnMl pant Mal be erne o5 (Econoble or approved equal).Latdecping Mot Aide rkned gad..and even distribution of tpeod to meet 2.Keep equipment away from structure to prevent damage to trunk and Ilmba jai I- 3 fa original pal. planing requirements Groan ad elope Mite he as ndoOt d on civil pen. Finish grading wee remove dl 3.Don't allow chemicals to be darn 9 C, • • V U VI.- dpurone or be area.to prove poellhe drainage thrcaglmat the art pled on the ground near the tree,i.e.,9oadn4 diesel,paint, LI n L.da© Cankdta roe keep re.for Owns'.A herbicide,deafer,thinners.etc. Cn .ep m prwentativi•n•p.ciNn.all receipts for sari amendment and topsoil.«wore. f i t[le0DES Removal of n war.non-not n••species s required by hand fa the entie wetland buffer am if 4.Provide means of temporary irrigation if the project runs through(the Bummer. •Q Z = a N P ROIECIIal Protect ebbing Mad.Adsests,end curb.ladeang.and other lealurm rrnoinhg as reel work Verify location of ne.ry,excessive weed growth may be treated with Rodeo or Garton 3-A(or approved made)in shot 5.If roots or limbs we cut or damaged.have them inspected by an ISA Certified AYborist and repaired •7-74 I�9 U a Q underground uYities prior to doing work. Repair and make good any danog•to.route INN.metnq feature.std.caused by accordance with the manufacturer'.neteouhns a treated ocaadng to his/her reeommendotione. <N N kndea dog hst.ialbn. FERIYJ2ER De oral apply lelliee to my patuge wimp tor•r•tiana Buhr a Walt Outlily Swdm. 6.Protect the trees from excessive heat,Le.,equipment.paving and/a bumng. Q I PLAIT QUALITY ASS1RMiQ Deliver erect hem nursery. Yentah end motet role of pant materd from,frying a°um pa..al. 7.Avoid lrenchnq through the root spleens.boring under them a frond digq.ng can Gaye roots. Rr1 • h .Stan pent.n.wale and protect thorn ken weather Yrmedlolr PUNTING TREES AND SNeAIM Plait upright cad ton to ea beet mama..a Mona.ip to edjacent pant• B.Contact the ISA Certified Arbons( fcenibr with the site prior to and long any activity within the "Gd 9+ N N IwY y upon d•(fvery•11 not to b.panted within lour Pax. ono structure.lmsen end remove t.ene bneq and burlap born top one-half at root bass at eft cleanly d dry zone or tree protection fencing for consultation. want hos agreed to hove excavation euperseed G u 1 emery stack Mora be heathy,we..branched and rooted..Pored true to wl.Iy and•pecks foe foliaged ore of diem..n broken or Rayed roots.ad pr•ad roots am Slogger Hate n rows. Booklet pontng hale with woe ma Mi• by rbaieL w m C O 2 ear• waiting eaM layer to tlmnots void. Y a ern O N O delete heW wade,and wen rote. Tree*end haw Weight Melee.•to ores ca INN.and haw an nl«I single leader. My E"e s r trees with Mane emery wit be rejected upon nsaeption. AN Plants True to non.with one of ma cinch a kt tagged with the AF1ER CONSTRUCTION: E't M av n0 p «EOM@ Tre.nubs.did groadcow.panted n typed areas MN he maened a mpliwm of 3'n depth P g careful or the roofs end structure Use planti cononon ngs and botanical norm and size or the pats n«corn .,nth standard.of machos of the American Meoclauon of 1.Carefully landsca•the area under the tree.ben Nurserymen,and Md caterer to In•Stmeadxed Hmt Noe.1942 Edition. one 18'n ranee,to ratan moisture and decwroge weed growth rand neer n•tdkd pant metered. Appropriate mach.as made from composted bark or leases not have not been chemically treoted.The use of 2. .11 live under the same conditions as that of the tree. Cantohr roan stock: Smell container-room Pang Meshed n removable conlahr.end be.St rooted to wren healthy growth. mach A frequently...dated areas Mall be limited.to ovoid my posenN water meaty knpets notating the 2.Avoid direct Irrigation spraying onto the trunk. The amount of krigolkn needed to keep new G Ode container Omits n mntMwm a nddmm of me err prior to deity.with roots flip contain but not root baun.. Bar. leaching of tonne and nutrients,as the migatkn of mulch Into waterways. plantings olive con often be enough to kW mature Imes. O root mock:Root.wen-aanened era%rou. Bled and bunpeed(BAS} Ban Me be of natural size to enure healthy growth.Ball NLDUFE PROTECROM:beprdeg a site ode ten.appropriate measure ad be teen to dirswoge 3.Do Pat cover existing root root s s with mad then 2'of sod. The map veal you add, the greater MM be firm and the banes sand. No loom a more en will be a:cpimle. wieile-rraled danege. If deemed neon. ,biodegr sable poetic men luting,or our approved method.Man M Ilia chances of damaging the root system. oOCd..Mora ne.ia.al ice and shrubs to prevent aw•ng by.idiifa 4.Provide irrigation and/or Oronoge to emulate pre-construction conditions. /V n ,w AID FINN TRADES Ladscape Contractor a to verily with the G.nrd Contractor II the on site loom.I.or N not ve In.alter d n,Supply enemata bid la sported tape.. SEED.• Betag rasa Ned noerwong to applicable State let. No melee weed wed. Submit Guaranteed NOTE: This tree protection pion Identifies construction proteclion measures to prevent unwarranted tree z canal,.; mt aa.t anew` loss. The identified measures limit the amount of earth disturbance etrroundinq the trees.and limit OC Lendsppe Contractor le to apply and pace I2 of topes.In planing beds If tpeoll stockpiled on elle N not conducive to peer Neer Gully See*Dwarf Tall F.p•40;Deal Preen Rye 30;Creeping Red femur/2S;Corona Bent Crap the removal of the tree's foals lams. Due to the vorio lion of every project,{i is udikai all of the pant growth,the Ima.cap•Cmtrator shall.opat IM requred arounl. Landscp•Contractor Is to submit somp•e of the 5;Apply at a rote of 2.75 o./1000 call p Y W lea Y Q Q ..parts we and/or sal amendments to the Landscape Arcldtet.Ina topsoil Mat be a sander loan,Re of d stied and awe .bow Identified meowres con be practicably applied to each individual tree; a h it Ikdy each Ur hied to ken or pant growth. IMgATIOkIa 10 M provided oar pr h sparote pm«Mon/bed by Landscape Controctr. Project Is to he measure a messory to retain etch tree. Prior to the beginning of construction o meeting between o enacted by a temporary. w d y.above-ground.stern.Mich MI provide Id com•for pat material.Guarantee certified arbor.and the necessary contractor;MI be held to determine the appropriate level of F Landscaping Moo nwd.Rolled grad.and even dshWUen of taps.to meet pkntng requirements Ord.and Sohn MM he system la a mnenum ono year. System o to mil 5*5 betS 710 Sladaw, protection for each tree,n retOlion CO what work needs to be comported h the tree's vicinity. On-site as receded.Planting bet gredet Mot be approximately 3'brow adpceet wdkL porn Feirie Ina..•lc..to Sloe for hod, supervision by a certified abortst Mal be determined and supplied as necessary. Z appkcatlon.rASh grading end remove all depressions a we arms to praede peilive boom.throughout the area An plantings under CM yurNaklion a•to be salted me inch per week(ran An.IS through October IS la the duration of the tea tsar maintenance pekd. • PLAN11Nt:GPFFFMAIRINC; NAN1DUYCEIM penes.Is repansble le the maintenance of Ode facility fa a mntm,m of tee years fa*a fig ~ Prior to eel prpratlan,d ones Mowing my undewabs weed or grass growth Mon be treated with Round-up Si.ukt the occeptonce or the Meaty by Orr Mater Serving(CWS). Ergnr a Owners Rep••stolive Mall np•ct the U accedence won the manufacturer's retractions. tacky Ink.annually(Sang et Fat)throughout the 1.a-yea mantenance period. II at any thm during the CC malty period the landscaping Malls be 8074 served of Ire and air.D•,or 90X arid towage of herbaceous Z SOL PIRPARATIOL' Work d aep*by renting to o minimum depth of 8'. Remove al stone(over 1)j'Mee).Pick.mortar,large Pala a it IM amount of incisive ran-native.castle•.sued*2074,IM Owner end rerpse N•viMdeads O O D dumps of vegetation and/metes d*ended paritng al the Mat pprepote time. The two-Nor maNtomme period end I vegetate,roots debris,or exlrane us matter turned p n wading. Soil.MI De of a homogeneous tie texture level, D from tore dole of replanting.The facility Md b•r.-nww1M and paled 11 Nkatbn rsatr limn J J enptn and lightly calmer onea to pus a menu•.10 of required roes ern hpan y n depth max eithn the 2 year mnenl and o•nod. wale aueity Filthy n to be kept ere of Merle and Z U .maned to neur water Sm. Haled aid menthe work deabed A the mecifieatime.genet d defects of In gouMCOw are odd 2-of cameo.(or as eppoved)and le n to the top 6'of sou. morns and wor•manM W Mal p, •vugn acceptance O PIANieG NOLL lay out re pant locates and exce ot•an sods nom Manna holm to 2 1/2 tnles the root burl a root ey.ten 0-ENI-UP At completion at each region of work a calm mete...map.;*Women..etc.Md be removed CD ' width. Loosen sou nee bottom of pal hat Dispose of my-mbar a debre from...Mien. Diet...loge of Melting bole ban the site. Al walks.poem.or other surface Mot he meet dean.mulch areas Mot hove debris removed with water,and adUst my area nosing dea.dg•problems and my sod aced ban eater. All moos of the project Moll be kept clean,orderly and complete. Y J Q SOL la:Prepare DM Ms A each plaiting hoe by mixing: D(� (n 0 2 pat Mtive lama(no alien) LL �y I 1 part compost(as.proved) tV Z 0 Thoroughly mix n pkntng lade and add feelers of the talonna retina (I) Snell shrubs - 1/8 n./pail the 4a. - 1/3 to 1/2 D./plant '7' Ill Q (/) ire - 1/3 to I h./pant >Ur Q QL, z fEE1lIIEb For tree ad shrub.use Commercial Frtlize'A'negmlc(5-4-3)with mem-nutrients and 50X row releasing CC nitrogen.Fa WWI pprkotisn In Ile seed ken areas Se Commercial Ferllhr'B'(8-16-6)with mlao-aublent•and 502 N 1-..,.O Q Sow-rSehg nitrogen. For lawn montenance use Cannedd Feelxr'C(22-16-8)with miao-plriente and 50%roe-releaekfg LL nitrogen. MUM apply Nmllzr to Soler Wdity Seale. PLASM°TREES Al.Sall&Plant upright atI lace to ghe hest appearance a realionMlp to adjacent pants and structures.tome CK 0 Z 6'minimum,lightly compacted layer of reared pentng eel err root eaten. Loom,and remove twine binding and burlap from Ur CC Q too In of roof Dot•. Cut aft Monty d broken or frayed root.and speed roots out Stagger Rant•n rows B«kle plent.q Q hole with soil mix while n e waning so layer to elknote void.. Nei ppraxnwlely 2/3 he,water thoroughly,One allow sate to.ee dewy. Pions r mating backrdl and dish serfse around pant .//'/ (H to hold wale. Final grade Mudd keep root boil Nightly than surrounding god•,not to emceed 1'. Water again until no more miler le absorbed. villa walehg by nigatkn eaten is not Newel STMIIO Cr TREES slake a guy d ice. Staten shall be 2'z 2'(neon.)guilty ice elate with point They Mall M of Douglas Y/jRK DATE D.P Core 110N Fe,Sear and sturdy.Stale to be minimum 2/3 the Might of the km,not to eased 8'-O'. Drew elate firmly I'-e brew Ire 1 7-17-09 OF Calafinemt pant..)hoe. Tree Me for deciduous trees atoll be'Choreadi(or better). For Evergreen Pe use'Coo-Strait-Tree Tin(e a Reepanam ...forced rubber he and guy we..)sfth guy wire at a/Mn•m 2 street 1Wte 12 go wire 11UU::C CF PLANTINGS Yeah plm1Ng ems with dark,ogod,modem swim fir or hermit bat(aged al let 6 month.)to a depth of 2'In grand cow ore aid oW in shrub bade.Apply evenly,not higher than grade of pant as It cane hen the feewry, and rale to o rnplh Min. Watr NorougNy,then hoe down pknln9 area nth fore.prop to.Sr Nem at pant.. GENERAL W ADVANCE': Protect ad maintain ear emceed n nee specification.against d defects of materials ad tarimaW4, ' �`f,�i/ through Rural aaceplance. Repo.pats not Sr normal heithy cadtkn of t n•end of the peied. Water.wed,crlthbts,mulch. �` yve reset pante to proper gads a upright poetian.remove aid.00d ad do nee••wory stanch.maintenance operations. •Men necesay to amid d ON out of plait material.and to promote heathy growth srv9at v ...e'en.. GLEAN-UP: At capNtien of•oai Sal n of work d.km malet.wuppin,equpment.• ,MM be removed from the rte. All er`y/.� CHARILO P TREE TIES _ _walks,paahlg,a other serf«..Mot be.wept dua,.mulch arel end have debris termed end any sot a.aed kern Palace. As w (OR AS APPROVED) y. are of the prone MM be Sept dem.orderly and droplet•. 61 2'a 2'O.F. STAKES DATE: 7-17-09 b CROWN OF ROOTBALL TO BE ,p8: 211279 \`/```,4,0 n To 2'ABOVE FINISHED GRADE l FILE: PH IA-LS ,/ �/ FINISH GRADE H 2' ROUND FOR WATER BASIN DRAWN: EH '•'lt(r� 2 1/2-BARK MULCH 4 M� �N•-tt 2 1/2- BARK MULCH CHECKED .LO : ., r�. 1-11,,,,,, 1!../L i= n .P 1\i w '- FlNISH GRADE IM O. .4 41 BAEKFILL SOIL MIXTURE I-6'MIN. I11 pe_alu_f BACKF1LL SOL MIXTURE COPYRIGHT ANKROM MOISAN -II:=11gak=1C'•=M' WITH FERnUZER VATH FERTILIZER ASSOOATED ARCHITECTS 2008 MOW 2 X R00TBALL EXISTING SUBGRADE 2 to 2 1/2 XROOTBALL EXISTING SUBGRADE O SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL O DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LA PLAN PE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE L2.0 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION s (`~ S� s o N w IP:ni rz �- / u -0 =• ° °a ti/+ � ov 1 ' / S N - k' �. _ .y. _• \. l ; A :''� b%z'i / / it �, rw � ! 7 s , , • y> -/, is FF� I'-'En r ,._ r� 4:110 /,/. / t,"�s �.,�,. . ,..\ Q U• vy .' .s /- It, � 0 UMU61E SCHEDULE o Z PRaECr: s1.ANtl+ars auaa i 601 LABEL DESCRIPTION WATTS LUMENS ARM MRMGDIENT Uf c 1 LP1-E)05TNG UGHT 16 5,'COBRA'STYLE,FLAT LENS LUMINAIRE MOUNTED BAO<TO BALI(ON M 005194 25'WOOD POLE 250 29000 8 SINGLE 0.690 3 LP2-COSTING LIGHT HP5'COBRA'STYLE,DROP LENS LUMLl61E MOUNTED ON M E)0511NG 25'WOO POLE 100 6500 0 6NGLE 0.690 2 LP3-PROPOSED UGHT WS,'COBRA'5i111,FLAT LUIS UN6IANE MOUNTED ON A 25'GRAY FIBERGLASS POLE 200 22000 6 SINGLE 0.690 NUL0.16C SUYYMY 'p PROJECT: ST.MTHCNYS ON 8 RO1 .n LABEL CALC 11W UNITS AVG MAX MN AVG/MN AMA MI 4 3 a PARKING ILLIRBNMCE Fe I,40 11.0 02 7.00 55.00 x < '' O (7 O y T ..-1 to /LIGHT LEVEL REQUIREMENTS JZ JO GRAPHIC SCALE ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION LIGHT LEVEL UNIFORMITY vp 'd TARGET 0.2 FC MN 2111 MAYANN OO - i V 21 LIGHTING DESIGN " ' `APo(NC PARKING LOT AO9ErED a2 FC 19.50+ « u �c ie F= Scale: 1"=30'-0" (1N P ) A U A L Inch= 90 ft DWG.NO EL1