08/20/2007 - Packet S
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA •
AUGUST 20, 2007 7:00 p.m.
TIGARD
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER—TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 •
7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
7:02 p.m.
3. COMMUNICATIONS
7:10 p.m.
4. APPROVE MINUTES
7:15 p.m.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2007-00001
Tigard Comprehensive Plan Update of Statewide Planning Goal 6: Air,Water, and Land
Quality Resources, Goal 8: Recreation Needs, and Goal 13: Energy Conservation
REQUEST: Amendments to the current Comprehensive Plan Topics 3: Natural Features
and Open Space; 4: Air, Water, and Land Resources Quality; and 9: Energy by updating the
goals, policies and recommended action measures to reflect current community conditions
and values. The complete text of the proposed Amendment can be viewed on the City's
website at http://www.tigard-or.gov/code_ amendments. LOCATION: Citywide.
ZONE: CBD, C-G, C-P, I-H, I-L, I-P, MUC, MUE, MUE-1, MUE-2, MUR-1, MUR-2, R-
1, R-2,R-3.5, R-4.5, R-7, R-12, R-25. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community
Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.380, 18.390, 18.705, 18.715, 18.765, 18.775
and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 3 &4; Metro Functional Plan Title 3 and 13; and
Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5 and 6.
8:15 p.m.
6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORKSHOP - HAZARDS
9:00 p.m.
8. OTHER BUSINESS
9:05 p.m.
9. ADJOURNMENT
•
Tigard Planning Commission — Roll Call
Hearing Date: -0?o-v-7
Starting Time: 7 oz) r,.
COMMISSIONERS: Jodie Inman (President)
Tom Anderson
`/ Rex Caffall
I/ Margaret Doherty
j/ Karen Fishel
Stuart Hasman
Matthew Muldoon
Jeremy Vermilyea
V David Walsh
STAFF PRESENT:
Dick Bewersdorff Tom Coffee
Gary Pagenstecher ✓ Ron Bunch
Cheryl Caines John Floyd
Emily Eng '- Duane Roberts
Kim McMillan /Sean Farrelly
Gus Duenas V Darren Wyss
Phil Nachbar
%m (
• •
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
August 20, 2007
1. CALL TO ORDER
President Inman called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard
Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: President Inman; Commissioners Anderson, Caffall,Doherty,Fishel,
Hasman, Muldoon,Vermilyea, and Walsh
Commissioners Absent:
Staff Present: Ron Bunch,Assistant Community Development Director; Darren Wyss,
Associate Planner;Duane Roberts,Associate Planner;Marissa Daniels;Assistant Planner;
Jerree Lewis,Planning Commission Secretary
3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE
REPORTS
Commissioner Walsh advised that the Tree Board will have a workshop with the Planning
Commission in September. The Board has been working on the goals,policies, and action
measures for the management and preservation of trees and other vegetation. Walsh provided
copies of the working draft to the Planning Commission. The Tree Board received input from
the Policy Interest Team, staff, and the Homebuilder's Association.
Commissioner Caffall reported on the Committee for Citizen Involvement. He reported that
the neighborhood webpages are almost ready to go. It's anticipated that everything will be
online by the first of the year. The CCI is scheduled to present changes to their membership
requirements to Council tomorrow night. The Hwy. 99W Committee will meet in the next few
weeks to review ODOT material.
APPROVE MEETING MINUTES
None
5. PUBLIC HEARING
5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2007-00001
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 1
ID •
Tigard Comprehensive Plan Update of Statewide Planning Goal 6: Air,Water,
and Land Quality Resources, Goal 8: Recreation Needs, and Goal 13: Energy
Conservation
REQUEST: Amendments to the current Comprehensive Plan Topics 3: Natural
Features and Open Space; 4: Air, Water, and Land Resources Quality; and 9:
Energy by updating the goals, policies and recommended action measures to reflect
current community conditions and values. The complete text of the proposed
Amendment can be viewed on the City's website at http://www.tigard-
or.gov/code_ amendments. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: CBD, C-G, C-P, I-
H, I-L, I-P, MUC, MUE, MUE-1, MUE-2, MUR-1,MUR-2, R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5,
R-7,R-12, R-25. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community
Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.380, 18.390, 18.705, 18.715, 18.765,
18.775 and 18.810; Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 3 & 4; Metro Functional Plan
Title 3 and 13; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5 and 6.
STAFF REPORT
Darren Wyss reported that this proposed amendment will replace current topics 4 and 9 of
the Comprehensive Plan in their entirety; and for topic 3, policies 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4,
3.6.1, 3.6.2 will be replaced. Changes requested at the July 16th Planning Commission
meeting have been incorporated into the proposed language (Exhibit A). Staff has reviewed
the proposed amendment according to the applicable review criteria and finds that it satisfies
the Community Development Code, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, the Metro Urban
Growth Management Functional Plan, and the Statewide Planning Goals.
Outside agency comments have been received. DLCD recommended a couple of
clarifications which are found in the staff report. Other agency comments and
Comprehensive Plan Update Department Review Team recommendations are also included
in the staff report. Wyss detailed revisions to the language since the July 16th Planning
Commission meeting.
Duane Roberts reviewed proposed changes to the Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space
chapter (Exhibit B). He advised that the second revision requested by Sue Bielke is already
in the proposed language.
It was requested that the term "non-native plants" in 8.1.xxxii be replaced with the term
"invasive species." Sometimes a non-native species may be better suited in an area than a
native species.
It was clarified that 8.1.xxi is not meant to eliminate existing programs for the Senior Center
and Library. It is attempting to provide additional programs.
Commissioner Doherty encouraged the use of signs in sensitive areas to discourage such
things as dogs and litter.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 2
• •
PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN FAVOR
Carl Switzer, 10310 SW Hoodview Drive,Tigard 97224 testified that he has been chairman
of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and a member of the Policy Interest Team
(PIT) for Parks and Recreation. He believes it is intolerable that there is no funded
recreation program in Tigard.
The PIT put forth recommendations for the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequently, staff has
red lined them. He encouraged the Commission to incorporate the PIT comments rather
than the staff comments, e.g., 8.1.13. This will provide guidance in the future to provide
publicly funded recreation in Tigard. Another policy that he would like to see reinstated is
8.3.1.
Switzer encouraged the Commission to support citizen input. When asked how much
money it could take, he said the City could start small and grow from there. There are ways
to fund a recreation program— establish a special district, such as Tualatin Hills Parks and
Recreation, which is a separate taxing entity that provides all of its own facilities,
maintenance, and programming; use a combination of general fund dollars and user fees,
along with additional grants; join with a neighboring special recreation district and share the
cost of providing service; work with a private entity like Sherwood has done with the
YMCA.
Switzer couldn't provide.an estimate of how much it would cost to start a recreation
program. However; he did say that he believes the Comprehensive Plan is a guiding,
visionary document that will lead us through the next 20 years. If we don't have language
that supports and asks for or maybe even requires a recreation program, we'll never see it in
Tigard.
Concern was raised about the language obligating the City to provide facilities and a full scale
program if there isn't adequate funding. Switzer said that Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation
District has been around for many years. They did not start with everything that they have
now. This proposed language doesn't say anything that would handcuff the City; the spirit is
that Tigard will invest in public recreation in some capacity.
Switzer said it's not anyone's intention to place an undue burden on the City and how the
process works isn't as important as having it clear in the Comprehensive Plan that there's
something that can be implemented. The City's consultant found favorable results for a
recreation program and the Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) has spent a lot of
time working on this. Public meetings were held and a number of people expressed support
for a program.
John Frewing, 7110 SW Lola Lane, Tigard 97223 supports Mr. Switzer's ideas. There has
been a survey and there is significant support for a recreation program in the City. The
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 3
•
language is only asking the City to consider seeking voter approval. He believes the language
of the PIT should be reinstated.
Frewing noted that the 2004 survey indicated that citizens would rather pay for open spaces
than recreation facilities and programs. He believes that both should be included in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Frewing is concerned about the adoption process for the Comprehensive Plan. The Comp
Plan is an integrated document. He thinks the Planning Commission should recommend to
City Council that they tentatively adopt these chapters and when it's all done, bring it all
back together to check for issues of integration to see if anything has been missed. He
equated the process to signing a contract with only seeing the first page of the contract.
Council should give tentative approval and reserve final approval until the whole package is
done.
Staff advised that when the language is adopted by Council, it will replace the existing
language in the Comprehensive Plan. We are replacing existing language in the Comp Plan
piece by piece. At the end of the process,if there parts of the plan that seem to be
disjunctive or create a conflict, then it is possible to go through the amendment process to
make changes. Staff is looking at the policies very carefully to make sure they're integrated.
One reason we're going through the adoption process bit by bit is that we need the tools to
start building a policy base to do such things as adopting a new tree code. Changes to the
Comprehensive Plan can be approved in parts.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
The Commissioners deliberated the proposed language at length. It was noted that the Parks
and Recreation Policy Interest Team was put together for the specific purpose of analyzing
issues, developing data, developing answers, and making recommendations. The most
desirable outcome is that the City has a fully functioning Parks and Recreation system.
The recent visit to Port Moody,B.C.was mentioned. The recreation program in Port Moody
has been in place for quite awhile and is making money. They have been able to expand their
program.
Commissioner Vermilyea commented that the intent of proposed language is to have a high
quality program served by high quality facilities. It is not the purpose of the Planning
Commission to determine how it is going to be funded or what it will look like. The purpose
is to decide whether this is important enough to establish goals and policies for putting a
recreation program together. The details can be worked out by policy makers.
The Commission took a break so staff could work out new language to capture what the
Commissioners have been discussing. When the meeting reconvened, the Commissioners
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 4
• •
moved on to agenda item#6 [see agenda item #6] until staff was finished with the new
language.
Motion by Commissioner Vermilyea, seconded by Commissioner Caffall, to reopen the public
hearing. The motion was approved as follows:
AYES: Anderson, Caffall, Doherty, Fishel,Hasman,Muldoon,Vermilyea,Walsh
NAYS: None
ABSTENTIONS: Inman
EXCUSED: None
PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED
John Frewing would like to add an item #D to Policy#1 of the Energy chapter to read,
"Orient new transportation capabilities to facilitate the broad use of commuter rail." When
new streets are planned, they should provide parking for commuter rail.
For 8.2, Policy #1, Frewing suggested adding the word "schools." He believes the trail system
should be connected to schools. Staff advised that the City has received funding to identify
shortcuts within the older areas of the City,which would include safe routes to schools and
trails leading to schools. Commissioner Doherty suggested checking with the school district
first to see if they have concerns about safety.
For action measure 8.2.vii, Frewing would like to add the words, "open space tracts and
neighborhood common areas." A number of subdivisions have open space tracts and
common areas. He would like these identified on Tigard's trail map. President Inman
questioned this from a liability standpoint. A lot of open spaces in Planned Developments
and common areas are not open to the general public because it introduces a liability to the
homeowners. The homeowners probably would not want them identified on a published
map. Frewing said the intent is to know that they exist for the purpose of eventual trail
construction if it's acceptable to the neighborhood association or whoever controls it.
Motion by Commissioner Vermilyea, seconded by Commissioner Caffall, to close the public
hearing. The motion was approved as follows:
AYES: Anderson, Caffall,Doherty, Fishel,Hasman,Inman, Muldoon,Vermilyea,Walsh
NAYS: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
EXCUSED: None
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
After more discussion, the Commissioners recommended the following revisions to the
proposed language:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 5
•
• •
• Goal 8.1, Policy #13 shall read, "The City shall identify funding to build recreation
facilities and provide a full service recreation program."
• Goal 8.1x shall read, "Consider seeking voter approval, as early as November 2008 and
no later than November 2010, to fund needed park and open space acquisitions and
improvements."
• Goal 8.1xix shall read, "Consider voter approval to fund needed recreation facilities
and a recreation program."
• Goal 8.1xx, xxi,xxii—delete all 3 action measures.
• Goal 8.lxxxiii, amend to read, "Remove and control invasive species and noxious
weeds in natural areas."
• Goal 8.3u is now 8.3i.
• Add an additional action measure under Goal 8.3 —"ii: Identify potential partners
including school districts, special service districts,private providers, etc., for the
provision of recreational programs."
• Goal 8.3, Policy #1 will read, "The City shall establish a recreation program served by
high quality community facilities."
• Goal 8.3, Policy #2 shall be deleted.
• Goal 8.3, add an action measure, "iii: Work with the community to assess appropriate
elements for a recreation program."
• Goal 8.1 xxxii, delete "When feasible and appropriate."
• Goal 8.lxxxiii, delete "where feasible and appropriate."
• Goal 8.2vii, delete "If adequate resources are available."
• Goal 8.Ixxxii, change the word `studies' to `surveys'.
• Goal 8.1xi, delete "when feasible."
• Goal 8.lxxiv, delete "When feasible and appropriate."
Per John Frewing's request,it was suggested to add item D to policy 1 "Orient additional
transportation improvements to encourage the use of commuter rail." Staff recommended
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 6
• •
not including the language in this Chapter. There is a transportation section that will be
coming to the Commission in the future. It deals specifically with public transportation, trails,
and other elements of the transportation system. It would be a more appropriate place to
address commuter rail. It was asked if it would be sufficient to take it out of the energy
section and just leave it in the transportation section. Staff said that the transportation policy
encompasses everything—commuter rail, buses, and other public transit. This would be a
more appropriate section to address specific issues about commuter rail. The Downtown
section of the Comprehensive Plan also deals with activities around the commuter rail station.
Ron Bunch advised that the City will be updating the Transportation System Plan. One
component of that is energy reduction through use of transit and other kinds of system
management programs. After more discussion,it was decided to leave the language as is.
With regard to open spaces and common areas and their relationships to the trail inventory
system, the Commissioners determined that it has been addressed with the language in 8.2.vii.
The language will be left as is.
The Commissioners discussed whether to add schools to the network of trails and paths in
Policy 8.2.1. They decided to leave the language as is, not adding schools to the list.
It was suggested to delete the words "when able"under 8.lxxiii. After discussion, the
Commissioners decided to leave the language as is.
Motion by Commissioner Vermilyea, seconded by Commissioner Caffall, to forward a
recommendation of approval to the City Council of application CPA 2007-00001 and
document findings and conditions of approval contained in the staff report as amended, based
on the testimony we've heard and the discussion of the Commission as memorialized in the
minutes of the meeting this evening. The motion was approved as follows:
AYES: Anderson, Caffall,Doherty,Fishel,Hasman,Inman,Muldoon,Vermilyea,Walsh
NAYS: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
EXCUSED: None
6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORKSHOP - HAZARDS
Marissa Daniels reported on the draft goals,policies, and action measures of the Hazards
section of the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit C). She provided information on how the draft
language was developed.
Daniels advised that the opinions of the PIT agree with those of staff on all but 2 issues. The
first is the way in which we define high hazard areas. The Hazards PIT prefers that hazard
areas be defined by map for all hazards. Currently, the floodplain is defined by FEMA map
and landslide prone areas are defined by text. Staff recommends against defining hazard areas
by map, as map error and map scale may interfere with the accuracy of hazardous conditions.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 7
• •
The second issue is the creation of a natural hazards home inspection program. The PIT
proposes that the building department offer home inspections to property owners to check for
possible vulnerability to natural hazards. The building department does not currently have the
expertise to evaluate homes on this level. Frequently, a geotechnical or structural engineer is
needed to determine whether a home is at risk. Implementing this program will require the
creation of one or more new positions and would have budgetary consequences. Staff is also
concerned about the liability involved in determining whether or not a home is at risk of
natural hazards.
Commissioner Muldoon asked about a hazard mitigation methodology for buried utilities. He
also asked about a mechanism for identifying likely flat roof collapse during severe weather
and how it could be shared with the public. Daniels advised that underground utilities issues
would be covered in the Public Facilities section of the Comp Plan. Regarding flat roofs, she
noted that severe weather isn't just ice and wind;it also includes things like drought and
extreme heat. In the Comp Plan, once we start specifying one thing, such as flat roofs,it could
open the door to a host of other possible problems. She believes it's better to deal with it in
the Mitigation Plan which will identify particular action items. Also, hazard response is not
covered in the Natural Hazards section of the Comp Plan;it is covered in the Public Safety
section of Public Facilities. Muldoon is interested in an action measure so that during times of
severe weather, there would be public information on the possibility of roof collapse. Staff
said they could add an action measure in the Public Safety section.
Comments from the Planning Commission (responses are in italics):
• Use sub-headings for each of the hazards to make it more readable.
• Under key findings,it states that as of June 2006,Tigard owns 35% of the 100-year
floodplain. What is the breakdown of the remaining portion? Portions are in the public
sector;the school district also owns property in the floodplain. Staff can break out the information for
the Commission.
• Clarification was requested for Policy#9 (zero-foot rise floodway). It means you can't put
any fill in a floodplain. Ifyou put a shovelful of dirt in,you have to take a shovelful of dirt out— zero
net rise.
• For Policy #13, replace native with non-invasive species.
• For action measure vi, does that include business practices? For example, there is an
auto wrecking yard along Hwy. 99W close to Sherwood in the 100-year floodplain.
During the last flood, cars were floating and obviously polluting the water. Perhaps we
could add an action measure to encourage changes to business practices that would be
consistent with water quality standards or as set forth by EPA or DEQ. It could be
addressed in several different chapters, but ultimately, the Development Code determines whether or not
a hazardous storage faciko would be allowed within a 100 year floodplain or on an adjacent property.
• Regarding 7.2.ii, how often is the Tigard Emergency Operations Plan updated? Staff
will find out. Staff f advised that Goal 7.2 goes above and beyond the Statewide Planning Goal. The
Statewide Planning Goal addresses only natural hazards and does not mention severe weather.
• The policy for business practices discussed earlier could also be applicable under 7.2.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 8
• •
• TVFR always has current emergency response guides. This,in some ways,parallels
that.
• Does Goal 7.2 adequately address live drills for citizens? The City offers a CERT program
which covers.specific training for citizens. Other than that, we work with Washington County for our
emergency education/training.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
President Inman reminded the Commissioners that when they take a break, they should not be
discussing the hearing item(s) outside of the public realm. Comments need to be on the record.
The Commission returned to Agenda Item #5.1.
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:42 p.m.
Jerree ' -wis,Planning Commission Secretary
A TEST: President Jodie Inman
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—August 20,2007—Page 9
• 0
EXHIBIT A
Environmental Quality
Environmental Quality addresses the quality of air we breathe, water in aquifers, wetlands, streams
and lakes and the responsible management and disposal of waste. Environmental quality is essential
for a high quality of life including a strong and sustainable economy. Therefore, Portland
metropolitan area governments and agencies, in cooperation with state and federal governments,
have developed systems to address urban development's impacts on air, water and land resource
quality. This includes measures to prevent environmental degradation and the need for
conservation. Statewide Planning Goal 6 requires Oregon jurisdictions to adopt Comprehensive
Plans that provide goals and policies as the basis to manage development's impacts on air, water and
land resources
Goal 6: Air, Water and Land Resources Quality
`To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state."
The community's vision is for a future where the character and livability of Tigard is enhanced by
the quality of the surrounding environment. The citizens know the importance of participating in
regional partnerships, of ensuring the natural resource systems function to provide clean air and
water, and of developing land use patterns and a multi-modal transportation system that reduces the
dependency on the automobile. Furthermore, it is recognized that expected population growth in
the region will require further effort and innovation to protect environmental quality.
At the local level, Tigard can protect environmental quality by ensuring its land use policies, codes,
and standards are up-to-date with contemporary best management practices;that it is compliant with
state and federal environmental laws and administrative rules; and that it leads by example in
employing environmentally sound and sustainable practices in its municipal operations. The City
also has an opportunity to educate its citizens of how changes in daily life can improve
environmental quality.
Section 1: Air Resources Quality
Clean air is essential for human well-being. Furthermore, if a region violates federal and state clean
air rules there can be significant negative impacts on the economy as a result of mandated actions to
improve air quality. To ensure access to clean air, the federal Clean Air Act was created as the
primary regulatory framework for national, state and local efforts to protect air quality. Under the
Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting standards,
known as National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), for pollutants considered harmful to
people and the environment. Air quality planning is focused on meeting the NAAQS and setting
deadlines for meeting these standards.
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is responsible for protecting Oregon's
air quality by issuing permits, developing programs, and monitoring air pollution to ensure
communities meet the NAAQS and to protect Oregon's pristine views. Air pollutants identified in
the 2005 DEQ Air,Quality Report as the greatest concern in Oregon are:
• Ground-level ozone, commonly known as smog;
• Fine particulate matter (mostly from wood smoke, other combustion sources, cars and dust);
• Hazardous air pollutants (also called Air Toxics); and
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 1 CPA2007-00001
• •
•
EXHIBIT A
• Carbon monoxide (mostly from motor vehicles).
As air quality does not know political boundaries, regional efforts were established to monitor and
plan for pollutants. The City of Tigard is part of the Portland Area Airshed (PAA), which is defined
by the Metro service boundary. The DEQ is responsible for ensuring the PAA meets the national
standards and developing the necessary plans to continue compliance. Currently, the PAA meets all
NAAQS standards (three-year averages are used to determine attainment/non-attainment of the
standards: eight-hour ozone, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide). However, DEQ is required
to develop maintenance plans for carbon monoxide and ozone to ensure continued compliance.
At the local level the City can have a positive impact on air quality. Land use, transportation and
public facility planning can promote land development patterns and transportation systems that
reduce dependence on the automobile. The city can coordinate with the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality to ensure that industries requiring DEQ permits comply with state and
federal regulations. Also, the city can protect existing natural areas and mature trees and promote
and participate in tree planting efforts. Vegetation has the natural ability to convert and sequester
carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. Trees and shrubs can also serve to screen and buffer dissimilar
land uses and attenuate noise pollution. The city can also ensure its codes and regulations prevent
and mitigate other negative air quality impacts associated with urban development such as visible
emissions, odors, glare and heat.
Key Findings
• Within urban areas, air quality is often much worse along major roadways.
• DEQ has issued six active Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) within the City to
regulate minor sources of contaminant emissions.
• Motor vehicles are now the primary source of air pollution in Oregon and due to population
increases, the number of miles driven daily by Tigard residents has increased 67% since 1990.
• The primary sources of household pollutants in Tigard include wood burning fireplaces, and
lawn and garden equipment.
• The Oregon Legislature adopted a number of specific measures to address air quality in the
region.
• The citizens of Tigard value trees and natural resources and feel that protecting these resources
will benefit the community.
Goal
6.1 Reduce air pollution and improve air quality in the community and region.
Policies
1. The City shall ensure that all development complies with or exceeds regional, state, and
federal standards for air quality.
2. The City shall support regional and state plans and programs to attain regional, state, and
federal standards for air quality.
3. The City shall promote land use patterns which reduce dependency on the automobile, are
compatible with existing neighborhoods, and increase opportunities for walking, biking,
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 2 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
and/or public transit.
4. The City shall continue to investigate and implement practices that reduce air pollution
associated with municipal operations.
5. The City shall cooperate with other public agencies to minimize localized transportation
impacts to air quality through intersection improvements, access management,intelligent
transportation systems, etc.
6. The City shall encourage the maintenance and improvement of open spaces, natural
resources, and the City's tree canopy to sustain their positive contribution to air quality.
7. The City shall improve the Environmental Performance Measures to minimize impacts from
noise and light pollution.
8. The City shall encourage citizens to modify their household actions, through education and
incentives, to reduce emissions. This may include alternatives for heating, lawn and garden
equipment, and transportation.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Perform a land use analysis to identify residential zones that could potentially accommodate
mixed use or neighborhood commercial development.
ii. Adopt and implement development regulations that include provisions or incentives for
alternative transportation use, particularly in Metro designated corridors and centers.
iii. Perform a sidewalk inventory that results in a city-wide GIS layer to be used for gap analysis
and the creation of a sidewalk improvement plan.
iv. Work with TriMet to identify underserved neighborhoods and find the funding to add
service in these areas.
v. Pursue funding for . : - :a : :: . . : _ - - intersection improvements, access
management controls, and intelligent transportation systems that would help to reduce
congestion.
vi. Expand the free street tree program by actively engaging neighborhoods and creating a pool
of community volunteers to help with the plantings.
vii. Place educational materials in the schools, Tigard Public Library, and City Hall that
demonstrate actions individuals can implement to help improve air quality in the community.
viii.Research "dark skies" regulations from other municipalities and develop standards for
Tigard.
ix. Research the feasibility of a buyback program for older wood burning stoves.
x. Research the feasibility of banning gas-powered leaf blowers and a buyback program for
petroleum powered lawn equipment.
xi. Develop an ongoing committee to evaluate a Tigard public transportation system
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 3 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
that would connect underserved neighborhoods with TriMet routes.
Section 2: Water Resources Quality
The quality of the water in our aquifers, streams, rivers, lakes, and wetlands is important to the
health and welfare of the community, as well as the fish and wildlife that rely on clean water for
habitat. To limit harmful impacts from human activities on water quality, the Clean Water Act
(CWA) was enacted. It regulates the discharge of pollutants into waterways through National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. In the State of Oregon, the Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has been charged with establishing standards, regulating, and
monitoring Oregon's waters for compliance with the CWA and NPDES.
Large municipalities typically have NPDES permits for their wastewater treatment facilities and for
stormwater runoff, called a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. In urban
Washington County, which includes the City of Tigard, the permits have been combined and are
held by Clean Water Services (CWS). The combined permit was issued for the entire Tualatin River
watershed to guide a basin-wide effort to improve water quality. It requires CWS to submit a
Stormwater Management Plan and a Wastewater Management Plan to DEQ. These two plans
outline the best management practices that CWS,its member cities, and Washington County commit
to employ to reduce pollutant discharges, regulate temperature, and comply with any Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) levels that have been established.
The City of Tigard is a co-implementer of the permits and associated plans through an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with CWS. The IGA outlines the functions the City must
perform that are critical to the operation, maintenance, and management of stormwater and
wastewater facilities and to ensure compliance with the CWA.
Separate from the NPDES permit process, Clean Water Services has developed a Surface Water
Management Program to manage non-point source pollution impacts on water quality. The Healthy
Streams Plan, a public education program, and watershed restoration projects are among the several
activities undertaken to improve the water quality of streams and wetlands within the Tualatin River
basin.
The City also has an important role in improving water quality. For example, it has committed staff
and resources to implement the Healthy Streams Plan. This involves ongoing efforts to restore stream
health and associated riparian areas, educating the public about how individual actions can improve
water quality, and coordinating policies and actions with other jurisdictions and agencies. These
actions help maintain compliance with Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 3 and
13 and implement the Nature in Neighborhoods Pmgram.
Tigard also seeks to improve water quality by adopting land use policies and regulations to prevent
erosion and protect floodplains and other sensitive lands including tree groves, wetlands, and stream
corridors. Land use regulations can also help reduce water pollution by reducing impervious
surfaces, and requiring storm water retention and treatment on-site. Also the City can provide
education about how low-impact development and green building techniques can conserve water
and protect water quality. Furthermore the city maintains a sewer extension program to connect
properties to the city sewer system that rely on septic tanks and drain fields.
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 4 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Key Findings
• Water quality in the Tualatin River basin has been generally improving since the 1970s, despite
continued urbanization in the watershed.
• In 2006, Oregon DEQ characterized both Fanno Creek and the Tualatin River as having"poor"
water quality within the City of Tigard. However, this is an improvement from the "very poor"
ranking received in 1995.
• Non-point sources are the largest contributors to water pollution in both Oregon and the
Tualatin River basin.
• Within Tigard, run-off from impervious surfaces, pet waste, and erosion/sedimentation are the
most problematic non-point sources of pollution.
• To enhance water quality, the City has and active program of tree planting,water quality facility
construction (vegetated swales and retention basins), and stream corridor and wetland
enhancements.
• The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the impact of growth on the community's natural
resources. •
Goal
6.2 Ensure land use activities protect and enhance the community's water quality.
Policies
1. The City shall ensure that all development complies with or exceeds regional, state, and
federal standards for water quality.
2. The City shall continue cooperation with federal, state, and regional agencies in the
management of Tigard's water resources and the implementation of plans and programs.
The City shall encourage the use of low impact development practices that reduce
stormwater impacts from new and existing development.
4. The City shall protect, restore, and enhance, to the extent practical, the natural functions of
stream corridors, trees, and water resources for their positive contribution to water quality.
5. The City shall implement measures to minimize erosion and storm run-off from
development sites during and after construction.
6. The City shall continue to collaborate on educating the public of techniques and practices
private individuals, commercial businesses, and industrial operators can employ to help
correct water quality issues.
7. The City shall investigate and use, to the extent practical,green street concepts
new streets, or retrofit existing streets and other measures that limit the community's
effective impervious area.
8. The City shall lead by example and develop green concepts for stormwater management at
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 5 CPA2007-00001
•
EXHIBIT A
City facilities.
9. The City shall encourage the Oregon Department of Transportation and Washington
County to improve the quality of stormwater run-off from their facilities.
10. The City shall continue to facilitate the extension of the City's wastewater system to
neighborhoods without service within the Tigard Urban Service Area, provided:
A. Properties benefiting from the extension pay their fair share of the cost; and
B. Annexation occurs prior to any property receiving service.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Research and implement incentives that encourage development to minimize impervious
surface coverage.
ii. Continue to implement the CWS Healthy Streams Plan.
iii. Work with the Tree Board to develop an urban tree management and
preservation program that increases the canopy cover in Tigard.
iv. Continue to inventory outfalls from non-treated stormwater systems and identify
alternatives for improving the water quality released from them.
v. Purchase properties located within the 100-year floodplain and develop a management plan
that will allow for their natural function in removing pollutants from the stream system.
vi. Research putting the City of Tigard as a co holder with CWS on the NPDES permits.
vii. Develop baseline measures of effectiveness to ensure erosion control measures are working
during the construction phase.
viii.Research the feasibility of a grant program that would provide funds to organizations to
develop educational programs.
ix. Research the need and feasibility of public restrooms to provide sanitary facilities for the
City's homeless population.
x. Install signage and doggie pooper bags to encourage the clean up of dog waste in public
parks.
xi. Evaluate the City's street cleaning practices to ensure they are performing up to their
intended results.
xii. Research the feasibility of a commercial parking lot cleaning program and incentives for new
development and retrofits to use green concepts during parking lot construction.
xiii. Educate the public about effects of flushing pharmaceuticals and develop a
program to collect and properly dispose of them so they do not reach and
contaminate our streams.
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 6 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Section 3: Land Resources Quality
Modern life inevitably leads to the production of waste. From the point in time when cities are first
developed, and continuing throughout their occupancy, by-products of human activity must be
collected and properly disposed of to protect the health of both people and the natural environment.
To accomplish this, the state of Oregon and Metro has partnered to create laws, rules and programs
to direct reduction and efficient removal of waste. The Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) is responsible for with ensuring compliance with state rules and statutes. DEQ is
also responsible for preparing the Oregon State Integrated Resource and Solid Waste Management Plan.
Within the Portland Metropolitan Region, Metro has the responsibility for oversight and
management of solid waste collection and disposal. This includes the responsibility to prepare and
update the Regional Solid Waste Management Plan. The regional plan establishes the framework for
coordinating most solid waste collection and disposal programs, directing waste reduction and
recovery efforts, identifying roles and responsibilities, and fulfilling DEQ's requirement that the
region have an overall waste reduction plan. The Regional Plan is also responsible for
recommending ways to address the solid waste management impacts of future population and
employment growth.
Tigard participates in Metro's plan update process and implements the plan through the Washington
County Cooperative, which includes a number of cities in Washington County. This regional
collaboration is important to reducing the amount of waste generated and entering landfills.•
At the local level, the City is responsible for regulating and managing solid waste and recycling
collection services within the city limits, and reviewing collection rates and service standards.
Garbage and recycling collection services are provided by private haulers who operate within
established franchise boundaries. The City enters into franchise agreements with the private haulers
for the removal of solid waste generated from residential, commercial, and industrial customers.
Key Findings
• Per capita generation of solid waste has increased annually by 3.2% over the last ten years in the
Portland metropolitan region.
• The region had a 59%waste reduction rate in 2005 and has set a target of 64%by 2009.
• Tigard's residential recycling rate was 53.5%in 2005,while the commercial recycling rate was
22.7%.
• Region-wide, there are significant opportunities for waste reduction improvements in the
construction and business sectors.
• Oregon DEQ regulates hazardous waste collection, disposal, and cleanup programs. DEQ also
provides education and technical programs to reduce risks associated with hazardous wastes.
• Metro maintains its own household hazardous waste recovery program in cooperation with
DEQ.
• The citizens of Tigard are concerned about population increases and the impact upon the
community.
Goal
6.3 Reduce the amount of solid waste entering landfills.
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 7 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Policies
1. The City shall continue collaborating with federal, state, and regional agencies in the
development and implementation of solid waste management plans and programs.
2. The City shall regulate and manage solid waste and recycling collection services through
franchise agreements that:
A. Ensure recycling opportunities are accessible to all households, businesses, and
institutions;
B. Implement waste reduction measures through prevention and recovery efforts;
C. Remain cost effective and environmentally sensitive; and
D. Comply with applicable plans, policies, and laws.
3. The City shall collaborate with the appropriate agencies to ensure proper permitting,
collection, disposal, and cleanup of hazardous wastes.
4. The City shall use public education to promote:
A. Opportunities for recycling, composting, and reuse;
B. Reduction of household hazardous waste and its proper disposal; and
C. Reduction of solid waste generated from construction and business activities.
5. The City shall reduce the amount of solid waste associated with municipal operations.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Find long-term partners and plan a yearly E-Waste Collection Event similar to the one in
September 2006.
ii. Start a composting program (including education) for City employees including the
purchasing of compostable plates, utensils, and cups.
iii. Research commercial and construction recycling programs that could be implemented in
Tigard.
iv. Develop and maintain a GIS database of DEQ hazardous waste permit sites and hazardous
cleanup sites.
v. Work with franchise haulers to adjust yard debris pick-up schedules to correspond with the
demand during different seasons.
vi. Research the possibility of expanding the number of items that can be recycled curbside.
vii. Work with local businesses to act as collection points for household hazardous waste. For
example, home centers would collect fluorescent light bulbs while paint stores would collect
old, unused paint.
viii.Support the creation of an Office of Sustainability in Washington County.
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 8 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A •
1. AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY
This chapter addresses thc concerns expressed by Statcwidc Planning Goal#6 which is:
"to maintain and improve the quality of the air, land and water resources of thc state."
agencies dealing with some aspect of out environment. Nationally, there i3 a confusing array of
Commission (EQC) are two agencies devoted to measurement, control and understanding of our
environments. In addition, there are others that devote only a portion of their efforts to
environmental qualities, provide technical assistance, grants and guidelines to local or regional
agencies.
jurisdictions, again with an impressive array of agencies and regulatory s fements--ply
(Rev. Ord. 02 15)
1.1 AIR QUALITY
Findings
• Within the Tigard Planning Area there are no major point source air polluters.
• The major source of air pollution in Tigard is automobile emissions.
• The City of Tigard lies within the Portland Vancotwer Interstate Air Quality Maintenance
Area (AQMA). This area is described in the draft State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air
standards for ozone and is predicted to remain in nonattainment to at least 1987 unless
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 9 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
• In the Portland Van}c-ouvcr AQMA, air pallecien is monitored by and planning efforts
:. ... - .-. : . -:-: - - rn .,, . . - -:. --
Environmental Quality (DEQ)
- - : •: : O - . . •• ..•. .. .
POLICY
1.1.1 THE CITY SHALL:
a. MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TIC RD'S R
• - _ . 11/ • •. - - -
(AQMA).
b. WHERE APPLICABLE, REQUIRE A STATEMENT FROM THE
BE MET,PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL.
. • • " - A - - '. . _- ' - . • - - D - a -. ! :!! _a
•
HAVINC THE POTENTIAL TO AFFECT AIR QUALITY.
1. The City shall coordinate with Metro-and DEQ to attain-and maintain the air quality goal
deseribed in the State Implementation Plan (SIP).
2. The City shall continue to utilize expertise available at the Department
:4'4 0 " . . ! .. . : -. 4-
Energy
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 10 CPA2007-00001
S
EXHIBIT A
Comprehensive Land Use Plans" when planning any development activities having the
'1. The City shall make every effort to design municipal streets and roadways and to establish
5. The City shall consult and coordinate with the Oregon Department of Environment
sus
6. The City shall aim to reduce the quantity of vehicle emissions by pursuing an energy efficient
urban form which reduces the number of vehicle miles traveled, and by encouraging the use
(Rev. Ord. 02 15)
/1.2 WATER QUALITY
Findings
• The quality of Tigard's surface waters are fait, inasmuch as the waters are not used for
• No major point source water polluters threaten local creeks.
a Some infiltration problems exist in the sewage systems.
• Reduction of open space, removal of vegetation cover, and development which increases the
amount of impervious surface all contribute significantly to increases in the peak flows of
• Offsetting measures can reduce the negative effects of urban development on water quality
and quantity problems. Examples include on site retention/ detention of storm water,
inclusion of landscape buffer areas adjacent to new development and conservation and
• Clean Water Services (CWS) is the lead agency for water quality management within
W
•
Manual.
(Rev. Ord. 02 15) •
POLICIES
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 11 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
1.2.1 ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TID URBAN PLANNING AREA
SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL., STATE AND REGIONAL
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS, INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINED IN THE
CLEAN WATER SERVICES' DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANUAL. (Rev.
Ord. 02 15)
1.2.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE AND ASSUME ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR
OPERATING, PLANNING, AND REGULATING WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AS
DESIGNATED IN METRO'S WASTE TREATMENT MANAGEMENT
COMPONENT. (Rev. Ord. 02 15)
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. In order to improve the water quality and quantity in the Tigard Area, the City shall consider
developing regulations in the Tigard Community Development Code or instituting programs
a. Increase public awareness of techniques and practices private individuals can employ to
c. Regulate site planning for new development and construction through the Tigard
Community Development Codc to bcttcr control drainages and erosion and to manage
storm runoff;
d. Incrcasc storage and retention of storm rurre€f to-lewer and delay peak storm flows;
c. Reduce street related water quality and quantity problems; and
f. Increase public awareness concerning the use and disposal of toxic substances.
2. The City shall not permit industrial er ether uses which violate State of Oregon water quality
diseharge-standards,
3. The City shall cooperate with the Metro and other appropriate agencies to establish practices
1. The City shall require that new developments obtain a Stormwater Connection permit from
Clean Water Services and be connected to the City's or the Clean Water Services sanitary
sewerage systems.
4.3 NOISE POLLUTION
Findings
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 12 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Hwy. 217 and Hall Boulevard.
.- . . . . , - - - : : Y- " -- - - .. . :
POLICY
4.3.1 THE CITY SHALL:
a. REQUIRE DEVELOPMEN-T PROPOSALS LOCATED IN A NOISE
CONGESTED AREA OR A USE WHICH CREATES NOISE IN EXCESS
OF THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS TO INCORPORATE THE
FOLLOWING INTO TI IEEE PLAN:
1. BUILDING PLACEMEN e •• - - • • • ' - • ••THE NOISE LEVELS WILL HAVE A MINIMAL IMPACT; OR
2. LANDSCAPING AND OTI INIQUES TO LESSEN NOISE
LAND USES.
b. COORDINATE WITH- DEQ IN ITS NOISE REGULATION PROGRAM
• I
c. WHERE APPLICABLE REQUIRE A STATEMENT FROM THE
/111 . . • • . . ■•• • _ _
PROPOSAL) THAT ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS CAN BE MET.
.0 _ . _ • • • •D. N_ -
2. The Tigard Community Dcvcleprncftt Cede shall cnttr-c that new =anrn -.11, industrial and
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 13 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
public developments arc landscaped and designed such that Department of Environmental
e - -•-- . -- -- " - -- -- -- - " - -
• negatively impacted by the new land use er asseciated-activities. This shall be accompli3hcd
3. The City shall seek a respon3c and/or -• - ' - - a-- - `-i; .-- - - - - - :- -- -- -
Quality (DEQ) when reviewing commercial or industrial uses in or near re3idential areas to
1A LAND RESOURCES
Findings
• Normal human activity and economic preeesses in Tigard contribute to the quantity of
di3po3al in the metropolitan area.
• Although MSD has the authority ever solid waste - : :: -, _ - . • - -- - :-
POLICIES
11.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE, IF POSSIBLE, THE CURRENT
QUALITY OF TIGARD'S LAND RESOURCES.
4.1.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE MSD'S RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY
TO PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City shall actively participate with the Metropolitan Service District (MSD)—and—the
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),in the solid wa3te site selection process.
a. Depth to water table;
b. Soil conditions;
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 14 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space
Access to parks, recreation, trails, and open space enhances the livability of a community and
contributes to the well-being of its residents. These amenities provide a variety of
opportunities for residents and visitors to enjoy both active and passive activities, while also
helping to preserve open space, wildlife habitat, and natural resources. Parks may also serve
as informal meeting places to draw people together and create a sense of place. These public
lands and facilities are highly appreciated by Tigard's residents and the City is committed to
their adequate provision. Statewide Planning Goal 8 requires Oregon jurisdictions to plan for
recreational needs, and this becomes especially important as the City begins to approach full
development.
Goal 8: Recreational Needs
`To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for
the siting of recreational facilities including destination resorts."
The community envisions a future where a wide variety of recreational opportunities is
available through a diverse system of parks, trails, and open spaces. This system would be
distributed throughout the community and easily accessible from all neighborhoods. It
includes not only developed parks, but open spaces to protect natural resources that the
community holds in high regard. The citizens also realize that simply planning for and
providing the opportunities is not enough, but funding must be secured to properly manage
and maintain the system.
The Tigard park system currently includes 169 acres of City parkland and 182 acres of
greenway and other preservation-oriented sites. These figures equate to 3.7 acres of
developed area and 4.0 acres of natural area per thousand residents. Most of this park and
greenway land is located within the floodplain. In addition to parks and open spaces, Tigard
has developed a successful trail program, consisting of 9 miles of completed trails. These
trails provide both recreation opportunities and transportation links throughout the
community. A major source of parkland acquisition and development funds has come from
the park System Development Charge (SDC) on new development, first imposed in 1977.
The City does not sponsor a recreation program and is not served by a special park and
recreation district. The Tigard Park System Master Plan covers the city proper and the
unincorporated Urban Services Area. Subsequent to the master plan's adoption in 1999, the
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 1 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
City added 19.3 acres of parkland and 24.1 acres of greenway. Because of population
increases during the same period, the City's existing level of service to 2006 held steady at
7.7 acres of public parks and open space per thousand population.
Key Findings
• The system of adding parks and related land and facilities in the City has kept up with
growth in the seven years since the Park System Master Plan's adoption in 1999 (7.7
acres/1000 residents), but has not achieved the Plan's aspirational standard.
• Many areas of the City are park deficient.
• The land supply available for parks and open space is becoming smaller and more
expensive.
• Given the level of development in Tigard, sufficient land for neighborhood parks is
unavailable to meet the needs of underserved residential and non-residential areas.
• Many non-City-owned lands and facilities serve the park and leisure needs of Tigard
residents.
• The City lacks a trail master plan to guide the development of the trail system and
facilitate progress toward its completion.
• The City has regulations in place that effectively provide for block links and pedestrian
connections in new neighborhoods. However, there are significant gaps in the off-street
pedestrian system within older neighborhoods.
• Citizen groups have identified a trail route within Northeast Tigard that includes on and
off street segments to connect with the City of Portland-adopted SW Communities trail
network. Citizens have proposed that this route be considered for adoption into the
Tigard trail plan.
• The trail officially identified by Tigard as the Powerline Trail is a segment of a larger
inter-jurisdictional trail formally identified as the "Westside Trail" in the Metro Regional
Trails Map.
• The City does not operate a recreation program and is not served by a special park and
recreation district. Consequently, Tigard residents have limited opportunities to
participate in recreation programs.
• Overall, City parklands are well maintained. Maintenance problems identified in the 1999
Tigard Park System Master Plan have been, or are being, addressed.
• The new Park SDC methodology sets a per-project percentage limit on the use of SDC
funds. Some 63% of the cost of park improvements is assigned to non-SDC funding
sources. At this time, the City does not have a stable source of revenue that can be used
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 2 CPA2007-00001
•
• •
EXHIBIT A
as the companion funding source for capital projects.
• Many of the projects identified in the Parks SDC parks capacity program are located in
the Bull Mt Urban Services Area and not within the City limits.
• Tigard does not have a parks foundation. Such foundations provide local governments
with important additional programs to finance park and open space projects.
• The City has been proactive in working with the Tigard Water District for the use of
reservoir properties for open space. Partnership plans with the school district for the
renovation and joint use of school playgrounds to meet neighborhood park needs have
not been developed.
• Volunteers annually contribute thousands of hours to Tigard's park system and are a
non-monetary funding source for park maintenance and improvements.
• In recent years, the City has developed and employed innovative methods to create more
active park acreage to serve community needs. This has included making use of a state
infrastructure loan program to expand Cook Park and making certain types of
industrially zoned properties available for park uses.
• The citizens of Tigard value pedestrian and bicycle paths in the community and support
the development of a well connected network.
• The citizens of Tigard value access to neighborhood parks and open space within a half
mile of their homes.
• The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the impact of growth on the community's
natural resources.
• The citizen's of Tigard are concerned about the lack of a public recreation program and
the lack of an adequate number of parks in the community.
Goal
8.1 Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents,
including both:
A. Developed areas with facilities for active recreation;and
B. Undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and
enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space
system.
Policies
1. Tigard shall acquire, develop, and maintain a diverse system of parks, trails, open
space, and recreational facilities that are safe, functional, and accessible to all of its
population.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 3 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
2. The City shall acquire and, where appropriate, improve natural areas located within a
mile of every Tigard resident to provide passive recreational opportunities.
3. The City shall seek to achieve or exceed the ideal park service level standard of 11.0
acres of parkland per thousand population.
4. The City shall develop neighborhood parks [or neighborhood park facilities within
other parks, such as a linear park] located within a half mile of every resident to
provide access to active and passive recreation opportunities for residents of all ages.
5. The City shall develop other parks, including linear parks, special use facilities, urban
plazas, skate parks, and pet areas, consistent with the descriptions and standards
contained in the park system master plan.
6. The City shall acquire and manage some open spaces to solely provide protection of
natural resources and other open spaces to additionally provide nature-oriented
outdoor recreation and trail-related activities.
7. The City shall ensure public safety is a major consideration in the planning, design,
and management of parks,open spaces and trails.
8. The City shall enforce park rules, especially against loitering, harassment, and
camping, and work to identify long term solutions to these three on-going park use
problems.
9. The City shall integrate green concepts into park and open space design,
maintenance, and operations.
10. In addition to standing committees, such as the Park and Recreation Advisory Board
and the Tree Board, the City shall involve its residents and businesses as active
participants and partners in all aspects of providing park and recreational services,
including park system master planning and City comprehensive planning efforts.
11. The City shall ensure that the community at large is adequately informed of
recreation opportunities and programs; issues affecting the parks, opcn apace and
recreation system park, open space. and recreation services; and volunteer
opportunities.
12. The City shall, either directly or in coordination with other stakeholders and
agencies, seek opportunities to acquire public open space.
service recreational program. Staff Commentary: Concerns have been raised
that this policy is premature because the City must first assess the need,
willingness, and ability of the community to pay for recreation services and
related facilities. This is a fiscal issue that must be addressed prior to making
policy.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 4 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
14. The City shall build and maintain partnerships with other governmental and private
agencies and organizations to optimize funding and facility resources and improve
park and recreational opportunities.
15. When considering acquisition of new parkland and open space, the City shall identify
funding for required maintenance and public safety activities.
16. The City shall require all development to pay a parks system development charge or
to dedicate land in lieu of a park system development charge.
17. The City shall ensure that any land dedicated to the City in lieu of a parks system
development charge meets the needs, goals, and objectives identified in the
Comprehensive Plan and Parka Syatcm Master Plan and has been evaluated
. - ...- . . - = - . . . . . - per comprehensive plan policy (# 24) governing
land donations. Staff Commentary: Eliminates the duplicate reference to the
Park System Master Plan contained in this proposed policy and in Policy 24.
18. The City shall continue to encourage and recognize the important role of volunteers
and community groups in meeting City park, trail, open space, and recreation needs
and in building stewardship and promoting community pride.
19. The City shall maintain and manage its parks and open space resources in ways that
preserve, protect, and restore Tigard's natural resources, including rare or state and
federally listed species, and provide nature in the city opportunities.
20. The City shall provide funding for a high level of park, open space, and recreational
facility maintenance.
21. The City shall work with all elements of the community to provide and manage a
fully functional urban forest.
22. The City shall seek the assistance of volunteer groups and other community partners
to help in maintaining parks, trails, and open space.
23. The City shall continue to improve access to neighborhood parks and other facilities
according to the City's Americans with Disabilities Act plan.
24. Acceptance of any land donated for park purposes shall be based upon its usefulness
and adaptability to the Park System Master Plan. The following shall be taken into
consideration when making a decision regarding the acceptance of a proposed
property donation:
A. The property's location within the City's proposed greenway system;
B. Its location bordering an existing park or greenway;
C. The degree to which the property meets the "site selection criteria" for the
facility type corresponding to its intended use as listed in the Park System
Master Plan;
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 5 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
D. The occurrence within the property of unique or significant natural or
cultural resources;
E. The condition of the property and the City's liability for any potential
problems or maintenance needs associated with its condition;
F. If landlocked, or enclosed within non-city owned land, the right of entry or
public passage through the non-city owned land; and
G. The existing owner's awareness and acknowledgement that the control over
public access passes to the City and its officers with the donation.
25. City-owned property may be used for private wetlands mitigation. The City will
consider proposals for such mitigation on a case by case basis, subject to the
following [a-d are contained in Resolution 96-42]:
A. It can be demonstrated that there is benefit to the City and the general
public;
B. The mitigation must provide a documented physical enhancement of existing
wetland;
C. The City should be compensated for the use of the area either through rent,
lump sum payment, benefit to the City, or as agreed to by the City Council;
D. The wetland mitigation should demonstrate no additional cost to the City for
maintenance or other factors, unless acceptable to the City Council [Res 96
X12]; and
E. Should the City consent to the private use of City-owned property, the
applicant shall obtain a City Sensitive land permit and all other necessary
permits and approvals for the proposed work. The required joint
state/federal wetlands application shall explicitly state that the City is not a
party to the permit and enforcement of the permit will be directed solely
against the developer.
26. Public notice (in the form of on-site signage, a City webpage posting, and mailings to
every party requesting such notice) shall be provided in the case of any proposed
City sponsored wetland mitigation on City owned property where no sensitive lands
permit is required.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Regularly update the Parks System Master Plan (every 5 to 10 years) to
ensure it continues to address the changing needs of the City. Update
sections of the document more frequently with an amendment or other
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 6 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
process to reflect the results of major policy or planning initiatives.
ii. Develop master plans for each park that: identify the locations and types of
development that will occur in the park, preserve natural areas, and ensure
development that promotes safe and aesthetically pleasing environments.
iii. Consider and respond to Tigard's social and demographic characteristics,
including its cultural diversity, when planning for and investing in park
improvements.
iv. Consider the development of a partnership plan with the school district for
the renovation and joint use of school grounds in park deficient areas to
meet neighborhood park needs.
v. Coordinate with and support Metro, Oregon State Parks, the National Park
Service and other agencies and that provide parks, open spaces, and
recreational activities in or near Tigard.
vi. Promote a safe environment in the City's parks and open spaces through on-
going contact and coordination with public safety officials.
vii. Consider the development of a marketing and communication plan to inform
the public about the value of parks and the recreational services they provide.
viii. Develop and distribute maps and brochures to educate users about the park
and open space system and promote appropriate use.
ix. Revise and update the Park System Development Charge (SDC)
Methodology to reflect current land and development costs and to consider:
A. The development of a dependable, long term funding source or sources
that can be used to provide the 63% in overall project costs assigned to
non-SDC funding sources in the SDC study's capital improvement
program; Staff Commentary: The deleted percentage could vary
over the years as the City invests in parks.
B. Adjustments to the extraterritorial (Urban Growth Area) improvement
projects identified in the SDC capital improvement program;and
C. Adjustments to the SDC fee structure that reflects realistic non-SDC
revenue expectations.
x. Consider seeking voter approval, as carly as November 2008 and no later
- - - - - =
- - : .: :: - . - : - -- - . Staff Commentary: The issue
of placing a general obligation bond or other funding measure on the
ballot should be determined by Council through a public process
before a policy direction is established.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 7 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
xi. When feasible, utilize alternative methods to acquire and develop open space,
parks, and trails, including local improvement districts, purchase of
easements and development rights, life estates, etc.
xii. Work to increase grants and donations from new sources for operating and
capital funding.
xiii. Consider the establishment of a parks foundation to assist with fund raising,
and acquisition, and special projects.
xiv. Explore additional ways to acknowledge and recognize sponsors and donors.
xv. Continue to use park reservation fee schedules that provide cost recovery
balanced against needed services. Provide services to City residents at lower
costs than to non-residents.
xvi. Continue efforts to involve the public in the allocation of and request for
funds.
xvii. Identify funding for required maintenance and management activities when
considering acquisition of new parkland and open space.[moved here]
xviii. Where applicable, take into consideration the costs of pubic safety services
when considering acquisition of new parkland and open space. [moved here]
xix. Consider seeking voter approval, as early as November 2008, for a local tax
facilities, sports ficld3, tennis and ba3ketball court3, etc.; and to finance a full
ocalc recreation program [moved here]] Staff Commentary: The issue of
placing a local tax levy or other funding measure on the ballot should
be determined by Council through a public process before a policy
direction is established.
xx. In the absence of a local tax level or other special funding mechanism to
finance a full scale recreation .ro• am .rovide fundin■ for a minimal level
of recreation program opportunities. Staff Commentary: The same
comments as stated elsewhere regarding recreation program funding
apply to this proposed action measure.
.-. : . .- - • ':: - . - : a . - •-. : - - . Staff Commentary:
The same comments as stated elsewhere regarding recreation program
funding apply to this proposed action measure.
xxii. Within or outside the established Social Scrvicc3 and Community Events
•a. . :: - - • ::: .- . . : . Staff Commentary: This
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 8 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
proposed action measure commits the City to the financial support of
particular private non-profit recreation groups. A decision to support
such groups should be part of the overall formulation of a policy
regarding the establishment of a recreation program or the annual
budget process. Alternative language is proposed below.
xxiii. Financially assist, when able, youth sports leagues and other non-profit
recreation providers
xxiv. When feasible and appropriate, make parks, trails, and open spaces
universally accessible by as many people as possible.
xxv. Provide public access to public open space in ways that protect and preserve
sensitive natural resources.
xxvi. Continue to seek the assistance of volunteer groups to help in developing
and maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces.
xxvii. Create volunteer opportunities and support those who want to participate in
making ideas,projects, and events happen in their neighborhood parks.
xxviii. Develop and apply administrative policies and procedures for use of
volunteer resources.
xxix. Continue to develop and implement specific management plans and
maintenance programs for the high level maintenance of all of the City's park
and open space lands.
xxx. Seek opportunities to introduce more environmentally-friendly, science-
based practices, including measures to increase re-use and recycling
programs, on-site filtration, integrated pest management, and other Best
best management practices.
xxxi. Develop and implement an urban forestry program to improve the condition
of Tigard's urban forest through effective management decisions.
xxxii. ' - - . . - : :: : -, include natural resources studies and
monitoring in the City's management of public open spaces and related
natural resources.
xxxiii. Remove and control non-native plants, including noxious weeds, in natural
areas, • - - - . . - . . . : : .
xxx7e. Identify funding for required maintenance and management activities when
-•. -- . . .. ::- : - - :. .. : . -: :: - . moved to above]
xxxv. Where applicable, take into consideration the costa of pubic safety services
- - : ... _ . a .. :: . .. :. .. - : . -_ .: .. -.[moved to above]
xxxvi. Inform the public about maintenance and management requirements for the
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 9 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
• City's various types of parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open spaces, as
for example by posting maintenance plans on the City webpage.
Goal
8.2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle
trails.
Policies
1. The City shall create an interconnected regional and local system of on- and off-road
trails and paths that link together neighborhoods, parks, open spaces, major urban
activity centers, and regional recreational opportunities.
2. The City shall design and build greenway trails and paths to minimize their impact on
the environment, including on rare and state and federally listed species.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Complete a trail system master plan to guide the development of the trail
system and facilitate progress toward its completion.
ii. Complete a Citywide inventory and prioritization of opportunities for short
pathway connections that increase bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and
complement the greenway and on-street bicycle/pedestrian systems.
iii. Develop trail standards for the many trail systems, sizes, and materials
needed in different settings.
iv. Add to the park system master plan map:
a. The Tigard portions of two "regionally significant" trails (the Westside Trail
(formerly, the Powerline Trail) and the Washington Square Loop Trail); and
b. The on- and off-street route identified by the citizen groups that connects
the Washington Square Loop Trail with the Portland Urban Trail Number 5,
which ends at SW Dickinson and SW 65th.
v. Coordinate trail development and maintenance activities with natural
resource management objectives and activities.
vi. As needed Where appropriate, furnish trails with amenities, such as
interpretive and directional signage, benches, drinking fountains, parking and
staging areas, and other services.
vii. If adequate resources arc available, Use automated systems to systematically
map and document trail easements, right-of-way dedications, proposed
alignments, and current trail locations.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 10 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Goal
8.3 Develop full-service recreational facilities and establish a comprehensive recreation
program, providing a wide range of recreational, cultural, and educational activities.
Policies
facilities (that may include recreation ecrrters, aquatic facilities, sports fielda, tcnnia
and basketball courts, etc.) in various locations throughout the City. Staff
Commentary: The issue of establishing a recreation program and its scale
and financing should be determined by Council through a public process
before a policy direction is established. The goal is to provide one. When
and how is a Council/community decision. Revised language is provided
below.
2. The City shall work with the community to assess the need for a recreation program
and identify potential funding for its establishment and operation.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Consider seeking voter approval, as early as November 2008, for a local
aquatic facilities, sports fields, tennis and basketball courts, etc.; and
it Develop an information program to raise the public's awareness of the
importance of recreational facilities and programs to public well-being
and community livability.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 11 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
3.5 PARKS,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Findings
• Many of the Tigard School District sites provide recreational nccd3 not found within
many of Tigard's parka.
or-lands_arc 3.
• A properly planned and managed sy • -- :: - : - . -- . .. . . . -
rcducc the impact of urbanization and serve the leisure and aesthetic nccd3 of all
residents. The system needs to recognize the rclap bctwccn urban uses and the
natural character of the land and drainagcways:
• The community has indicated a desire for open space linkages which follow scenic
routes and connect parks, schools, playgrounds, shopping arca3, other public 3itc3 and
• The City nccd3 to develop an adequate system of open space, recreation lands and
• In the process of planning for a park and recreation system, it is necessary to classify
the individual components such as neighborhood-parks and the grecnway which will
or could comprise the park system. In addition, the establishment of a reasonable
levels of service to be provided. The actu. • :: -- : . - . .:. -
rclating the provision of facilities and services to the particular nccd3 and recreation
desires of the resident3 to be served.
POLICIES
3.5.1 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WHICH WILL PROVIDE
FOR OPEN SPACE, RECREATION LANDS, FACILITIES, AND
PRESERVE NATURAL, SCENIC AND HISTORIC AREAS IN A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCES.
3.5.2 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO
DEVELOP REGREATIONAL FACILITIES.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 12 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
3.5.3 THE CITY HAS DESIGNATED THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN OF
FANNO CREEK, ITS TRIBUTARIES, AND THE TUALATIN RIVER AS
CREENWAY, WHICH WILL BE THE BACKBONE OF THE OPEN
SPACE SYSTEM. WHERE LANDFILL AND/OR DEVELOPMENT ARE
ALLOWED WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE 100 YEAR
FLOODPLAIN, THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THE CONSIDERATION
OF DEDICATION OF SUFFICIENT OPEN LAND AREA FOR
GREENWAY ADJOINING AND WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN.
3.5.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN INTERCONNECTED PEDESTRIAN/ .
BIKEPATHTH' s _ - e _
(Rcv. Ord. 98 19; Ord. 87 66; Ord. 81 36)
1. The Tigard Community Development Codc shall require land divisions and major
developments to set aside, dedicate land, or pay a fec in lieu of land aside based on
a. An arca composed of developable lands which may provide active recreation
space;and
b. Adequate pa3sive open space to protect natural resources at the site and protect
development form hazard areas.
2. The City shall permit land which is set aside within developments to remain in private
a. Portion3 arc sufficiently improved and maintained to offer active recreation
opportunities;
b. They do not interfere with the continuity of or access to adjacent grccnway
lands;and
c. Easements transferring development rights-arc dedicated to the public.
reservation.
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 13 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
5. Opcn spacc and greenway3 shall be used to cnhancc the accessibility to schools and
6. Park classifications and standards shall be adeptcd and a program developed for
needs of the local residents.
7. Streets and drainagcway3 shall be combined with a parkway or grccnway concept to
economic activity.
9. Master plans for each park shall be developed. These plans shall identify facilities for
each park and ensure development which promotes safe and aesthetically pleasing
traffic and other negative aspects of urban life.
10. The City shall continue to implement the adopted bike plan by requiring development
adjacent to the Creenway to construct their portion of the bikepath system.
11. To augment the scenic benefit of the grecnway, the City shall establish the major
vehicular transportation routes as scenic or visual cerridors. The Park Board should
3.6 PARK STANDARDS
Findings
• .i . -.
greenway, and 1.71 miles of greenway trails.
• There arc adopted plans for eight of the nine City parka.
• Although Schcckla Park has not been accepted by the Park Board, the land was
dedicated to the City for park purposes.
• Duc to recent cut backs in revenues to .- - • - • - . . . . - . . . .. . • -
• The City's Park System Development Charge is acquired through new development
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 14 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
•
POLICIES
3.6.1 INDIVIDUAL PARK SITES, AS DEFINED BY THE PARKS AND OPEN .
DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING PRIORITIES:
a. FACILITIES WITHIN A PARK WILL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET
THE NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE PARK SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDC) DISTRICT RESIDENTS AND
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE. PARK AND/OR
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN GREATEST DEMAND AND
LEAST SUPPLY SHOULD RECEIVE THE HIGHEST
DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES.
b. PARKS SHOULD BE PLANNED TO ENSURE MAXIMUM
BENEFIT TO THE GREATEST NUMBER OF LOCAL
RESIDENTS. FOR THIS REASON, ACQUISITION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY - - • • -
GIVEN THE HIGHEST PRIORITY.
c. DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
WILL HAVE A LOWER PRIORITY FOR PUBLIC FUNDING AND
ARE ENCOURAGED TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PRIVATE
SECTOR WITHIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS AND
MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS.
d. NEW MINI PARKS HAVE THE LOWEST DEVELOPMENT
PRIORITY AND SHOULD BE SUPPLIED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
. . • . • _ .. .' - .. _ • . - . • •
_ .. \ • . . • • Y_ \ • I • ! . - - -
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
c. PROVISION OF REGIONAL PARK FACILITIES WILL ONLY BE
CONSIDERED AS AN INTERJURISDICTIONAL PROJECT, AND
SHOULD HAVE A LOW PRIORITY UNLESS UNUSUAL
CIRCUMSTANCES ARISE.
f. ACCEPTANCE OF ANY LAND DEDICATED FOR PARK
Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 15 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
PURPOSES SHALL BE BASED UPON ITS USEFULNESS AND
ADAPTABILITY TO THE ADOPTED PARK AND OPEN SPACE
SYSTEM.
3.6.2 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH OTHER PUBLIC, PRIVATE
IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S
ADOPTED PARK PLANS.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
1. The City shall continue to seek revenue sourc-- : ' ' - - -- - -- : - - - -
thc adoptcd park plans. The adopted park plans arc: Fanno Crcck Park, Cook Park,
Woodard Park, Jack Park, Summcrlakc Park, Englewood Park, Liberty Park and Ye
Old Windmill Park.
2. The City shall develop a "future park needs asses3ment" to determine the number of
acres needed for future park u3es. The current park standards shall be used as a basis
for this assessment. The future park needs assessment will specifically address
3. A3 a precondition to development, the City's Community Development Codc shall
require the dedication of the grccnway and park land,if not already dedicated.
�. The City shall continue to implement the adopted pedestrian/bikcpath pathway plans.
. Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space
Planning Commission Hearing 16 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
Energy Conservation
Our way of life is powered by energy. From the construction process to home heating to
• getting around the community, affordable and reliable energy sources are counted upon to
sustain our needs. Energy also drives the economy and has a significant impact on the
environment. These roles are important to consider when planning for future sources,
distribution, conservation efforts, land use, transportation, and development patterns. The
City's commitment to manage land use to conserve energy is based on Oregon Statewide
Planning Goal 13.
Goal 13: Energy Conservation
`Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of
all forms of energy, based on sound economic principles."
Tigard residents envision a future where access to reliable energy supplies and their use do
not degrade the environmental quality of the community. They recognize the importance of
renewable energy resources for the economy, the value in conservation efforts, and the
significance of land use and transportation planning on energy consumption. Public
transportation and a well-connected bicycle and pedestrian network are services greatly
supported by the community. The community also recognizes that the City can employ new
techniques and technologies in municipal operations, as well as encouraging citizens to take a
personal interest in energy consumption and conservation.
The City of Tigard currently has no energy resources and no future plans to develop any
generation or supply facilities. The Oregon Department of Energy (DOE) has taken the
statewide lead by planning to ensure an adequate, affordable, and clean energy supply is
available for Oregonians. The DOE produces the Oregon Enety Plan on a biennial basis. It
assesses energy demand and supply in the state,identifies issues affecting energy, and
presents an action plan to meet the goals of the plan.
Energy conditions and future issues identified by the 2005-2007 Oregon Energy Plan include:
• Unstable energy pricing and supply will continue to affect communities as it did in
2002 when Oregonians spent 50% more per unit of energy to heat their homes than
in 1998.
• World oil production may peak in the next decade and begin a long-term decline.
Coupled with a growth in worldwide demand, peak oil will maintain or increase
already high oil prices.
• Natural gas supplies from North America are declining,while prices have doubled in
the past five years. Worldwide competition for the gas is also expected to increase.
To address these issues, the Oregon Energy Plan recommends conservation efforts for
households, businesses,industry, and transportation, as well as developing clean and
renewable energy resources. These efforts can provide insulation from, and reduce the
community's vulnerability to,volatile pricing and supplies. They are also consistent with
statewide planning Goal 13 for maximizing the conservation of all forms of energy. Building
efficiency standards, the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating
system, and weatherization programs are options for promoting energy conservation in
buildings. Metro's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is required to address energy
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 1 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
conservation, efficiency, and alternative transportation options under state and federal law.
Options include driving less, buying fuel-efficient vehicles, or using alternative fuels.
Tigard has the ability to affect energy conservation efforts through developing efficient land
use and transportation plans that reduce automobile trips. This includes promoting compact
mixed use communities, and transit use and development. The City can lead by example in
utilizing alternative energies and becoming more energy efficient in municipal operations.
Tigard can also challenge residents to reach energy conservation goals set by the community.
Key Findings
• Transportation is the largest use of energy in the state at 38%. A considerable reduction
in energy use can be made with individuals altering their habits related to the use of
motor vehicles.
• The City has no energy generation or supply facilities and therefore the community's
energy supply and pricing is controlled by forces beyond its direct influence.
• A number of alternative fuel options exist for motor vehicles,but supplies and
availability are limited.
• Large energy uses which the City has control over include street lighting, water transfer
pumps, heating and cooling of municipal buildings, and the motor vehicle pool.
• Solar-generated power and wood heating are the two most common options available to
the community for producing their own energy. Wood heating can be problematic to air
quality due to the release of fine particulate matter.
• Weatherization, energy efficient building materials and appliances, and alternative energy
sources can all reduce energy consumption in buildings.
• The citizens of Tigard value pedestrian and bicycle paths in the community and support
the development of a well connected network.
• The citizens of Tigard value access to bus service in the community.
• The following land use planning strategies can result in a more energy-efficient
community:
• Establishing mixed-use zones to encourage working,living, and shopping in the
same neighborhood
• Providing opportunities for increased density along public transit lines
• Developing a public transit system that is reliable, connected, and efficient
• Building a bicycle and pedestrian network that is connected, safe, and accessible
• Connecting streets for efficiency and reducing congestion
• Re-use of vacant and underutilized land.
Goal
13.1 Reduce energy consumption.
Policies
1. The City shall promote the reduction of energy consumption associated with vehicle
miles traveled through:
A. Land use patterns that reduce dependency on the automobile;
B. Public transit that is reliable, connected, and efficient; and
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 2 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
C. Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is safe and well connected.
2. The City shall implement regional and state regulations,plans, and programs that
promote energy conservation.
3. The City shall require future development to consider topography,vegetation,and
solar access during the design phase to reduce demands for artificial heating, cooling,
and lighting.
4. The City shall implement and enforce state energy efficiency standards during the
building permit review process.
5. The City shall take a leadership role in local energy matters by:
A. Designing and developing public facilities,wherever possible, that take advantage
of alternative energy sources and conserve energy in operations;
B. Conducting energy audits on existing City facilities and implementing cost-
effective recommendations as soon as possible;
C. Investigating and participating in,when feasible,green energy programs,which
use renewable energy resources; and
D. Continuing to investigate new technologies that can reduce municipal energy
consumption.
6. The City shall support energy conservation by:
A. Encouraging designs that incorporate Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) standards or achieve a minimum certification;
B. Educating the public about personal actions that can be taken to improve energy
efficiency and reduce energy consumption;
C. Directing the private sector to the variety of available incentives programs; and
D. Providing flexibility in the land use process to take advantage of solar radiation.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Create a process that requires new development to consider topography,
vegetation, and solar access during the design phase.
ii. Develop target decreases for energy consumption associated with municipal
operations.
iii. Purchase a percentage of Green Energy for municipal operations and then
challenge the community to do the same.
iv. Research and implement incentives and development codes that would
encourage energy efficiency in new developments.
v. Survey the community about energy consumption and identify top
concerns that could be addressed through conservation incentives.
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 3 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT A
9. ENERGY
Statewide Planning Coal 1/13,
provide the community with a comprehensive energy program. However, the
decreases. The increasing cost of energy combined with the fact that most
the local economy.
initial energy source that the community should explore. They-do so based on the fact that
conservation i3 the cheapest energy source, most readily available, least environmentally
detrimental and most influenced by local policy.
Energy."
Findings
• Transportation and residential uses account for approximately half of the total energy
• The City of Tigard has no developed energy sources.
• Conservation of energy at the local level is best achieved through pregrams-aiened-ar
u3C3 as a whole and encouraging alternative energy u3c3.
• All forma of non renewable energy sources-used today arc finite and the-coat of these
sources has increased as the Supply has decreased.
• Main transit systems can have a positive influence upon energy consumption but
• The availability of cheap energy in-the pant has resulted in
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 4 CPA2007-00001
•
EXHIBIT A
3tructurc3.
• Small scale wind generating devices may be a viable alternative energy source for
Tigard residences.
in the Portland Arca.
POLICIES
9.1.1 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN ENERGY
CONSUMPTION BY INCREASED OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY
CONSERVATION AND THE PRODUCTION OF ENERGY FROM
ALTERNATIVE SOURCES.
9.1.2 THE CITY SHALL ESTABLISH A BALANCED AND EFFICIENT
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WHICH 0• ' - • - • . - - -.• •
USE PLAN AND IS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE ENERGY IMPACTS.
9.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH
EMPHASIZES SOUND ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION.
1. The City shall encourage public and private programs that offer weatherization and
energy conservation programs, e.g., tax credits, low interest weatherization loans, etc.
3. The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to
�. The City Shall, in the Tigard Community Development Codc, allow for more flexibility
6. The City shall cooperate with both public and private agencies that make use of site
7. The Tigard Community Development Codc shall allow for mixed use developments
9. Locational criteria shall be established to minimize vehicular travel in order to
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 5 CPA2007-00001
•
EXHIBIT A
c. Impacts upon drainage;
d. Watcr quality dcgradation or similar problems.
3. The City shall ensure that future land use activities with significant waste and procesa
'1. The City shall sock a response or assistance from the Department of Environmental
•
.�.
management plan. The City shall-support MSD's "Procedures for Siting Sanitary
•
•
Energy Conservation
Planning Commission Hearing 6 CPA2007-00001
Darren Wyss- Re: Comp Plan - Environmel Quality Comments __T�_ ____ _„_ Page_1
EXHIBIT
From: Carla Staedter
To: Darren Wyss
Date: 7/23/2007 5:48:22 PM
Subject: Re: Comp Plan - Environmental Quality Comments
Hi Darren,
I hope you have a great vacation planned.
Here are some comments on the Water Resources Section that may be helpful:
iv-We do inventory outfalls as part of implementing the Healthy Streams Plan so that may be a repeat
and could be assumed if we are implementing Healthy Streams Plan. We have goals for outfall retrofitting
and are implementing projects to do just that each and every year.
vi - I don't think it is a good idea be a"coholder”of the NPDES permit. Really all the cities in the basin are
coholders of the NPDES permit. The permit needs to be held by a single entity so there is a single point of
compliance. I don't think it is a good idea to have Tigard singled out. CWS holds the permit because that
was needed basin wide to clean up the Tualatin and it's tributaries and there has been tremendous
progress made. Also....we are at the very bottom of the basin and don't have control over what goes on
upstream of us. Being a co-holder of the permit just doesn't make sense and makes us responsible for
things outside of our jurisdiction and control.
Consider adding an action item: Develop a program to collect and dispose of medicine to keep it out of
our streams. Educate the public not to flush medicines.
That's it for now. There must have been some interesting meetings to collect this information. I would
love to hear about them when you have time.
Carla
>>> Darren Wyss 07/23 4:49 PM >>>
Attached is the language that will be brought forward for a public hearing with the Planning Commission
on Aug 20th. The language is a result of the Policy Interest Team meetings, comments from our meeting
on June 27th, and the Planning Commission workshop last week where they reviewed the language and
requested some changes. Please review the attached document and get any comments that you may
have back to me by Aug 6th. I will incorporate your comments into the staff report. FYI, I will be on
vacation from Wed July 25 to Mon Aug 6. If you have a burning question, you can contact Ron Bunch
while I am gone.
Darren Wyss
Associate Planner/GIS
Long Range Planning Division
City of Tigard
503-718-2442
CC: Brian Rager
i EXHIBIT c
,,F
•F.
/'.•4' . �/ e 0n Department of Land Conservation and Development
,u'. y 2 1 800 NE Oregon Street MIS 18, Suite 1145
% Portland, Oregon 97232-2162
a—s 9/ Theodore R.Kulongoski,Governor
Phone: (503)731-4065
Fax: (503)731-4068
Web Address:http://www.lcd.state.or:us
ipa/A
July 25, 2007
Mr. Darren Wyss
City of Tigard _
13125 SW Hall Boulevard •
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: CPA2007-00001, amendments to Chapter 3, 4 and 9 of the Comprehensive Plan
related to Natural Features; Open Space; Air, Water and Land Resources;and
Energy. (DLCD file#Tigard 006-07)
Dear Darren,
Thank you for the opportunity to review the first installment of the Comprehensive Plan
update undertaken by the City of Tigard. The City should be commended for
undertaking such a thorough review of its Plan. DLCD appreciates the overall time line
submitted, and looks forward to reviewing other components of the update as they are
available. DLCD is pleased to offer some comments for the record on this proceeding.
Generally, the sections submitted are well done and respond to the modern milieu. The
comprehensive plan makes the connection between land use and transportation
effectively. The submitted sections demonstrate a strong understanding of modern
planning issues and methods of addressing them.
DLCD is also pleased to see the prominence of trails in the recreation section of the
submittal. To the extent trails provide a transportation role as well as a recreation role,
DLCD suggests that trails be incorporated into the upcoming plan update related to
transportation. When the action of providing a trail addresses two public purposes—
namely recreation and transportation—the City should highlight it and emphasize the
dual benefit.
The City may want to reconsider the wording on action item 4.l.e under Air Quality.
The actions taken to "reduce congestion"may or may not improve air quality. If"reduce
congestion"is implemented through adding lanes to increase road capacity, more
vehicles are on the road, and thus negatively affecting air quality. If"reduce congestion"
is implemented by reducing vehicle miles traveled, then there is a positive impact on air
quality. DLCD suggests the City clarify the intent of this action item.
t
Tigard 006-07
Page 2 of 2 -
Last, the City may want to have further consideration on the Water Quality section.
There is no mention of the regional program—Nature in the Neighborhoods—even
though it addresses both riparian corridor protection and water quality. The City may
want to consider broadening its Comprehensive Plan language to recognize this regional
program.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Tigard Comprehensive
Plan update. We look forward to future installations.
Warm regards,
t.-AA,—fAt7
Stacy Humphrey
Regional Representative
CC: Matt Crall,Amanda Punton,Gloria Gardiner,Darren Nichols,Mara Ulloa(via e-mail)
•
•
EXHIBIT, D
Darren Wyss
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
8/07/2007
Subject: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Update
Mr. Wyss,
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) has reviewed the Tigard
Comprehensive Plan Update Statewide Planning Goal 6: Air, Water, and Land Resources
Quality, Goal 8: Recreational Needs, and Goal 13: Energy Conservation. At this time,
ODFW would like to submit the following recommendations.
Goal 6: Air, Water, and Land Resources
Air Resources Quality
Add the following items to the list of Recommended Action Measures:
"Work with the Tree board to develop an urban tree management and protection
program that increases the canopy cover in Tigard."
"Perform a survey of tree canopy cover to evaluate existing canopy cover
conditions and identify needs and opportunities for increasing tree canopy cover."
Water Resources Quality
Revise Policy 4 as follows:
"The City shall protect, restore, and enhance the natural functions of stream
corridors, trees, and water resources for their positive contribution to water
quality."
Revise Policy 6 as follows:
"The City shall continue to promote, support and collaborate on educating the
public of techniques and practices private individuals and commercial and
industrial operators to help correct water quality issues."
Revise Policy 7 as follows:
• •
"The City shall investigate and use green street concepts, eco roofs and other
measures that reduce the community's effective impervious area."
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall protect/maintain riparian
buffers to at least 50 feet for non fish bearing streams and at least 100 feet for fish
bearing streams. Buffer distances are to be measured on either side of stream centerline.
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall support consideration of
water quality when considering placement and design of recreational trails. Placement of
trails shall be avoided in areas prone to erosion to protect water quality.
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall promote and incorporate
the use of pervious trail surfaces to protect water quality.
Add specific language to Recommended Action Measure "v." to address restoration of
wetland/riparian area function to increase filtration of contaminants and sediment with
the intent of improving water quality.
Land Resources Policy
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall provide incentives to
households and commercial operators for recycling to reduce the amount of solid waste.
Goal 8: Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space
Add the following Key Findings:
"Open spaces and natural areas can provide important wildlife habitat and wildlife
movement corridors within urban areas."
"Open spaces and natural areas are often areas where humans interface with
wildlife. There are both potential benefits as well as potential risks with this.
Appropriate "Living with Wildlife" practices can maximize public enjoyment of
wildlife while minimizing potential conflicts."
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall post signs in open spaces
and natural areas to restrict dogs from entering designated areas.
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall post signs in open spaces
and natural areas that communicate that harassment and feeding of wildlife is prohibited.
Add specific language to the Policies that states the City shall place trails outside open
spaces and natural areas in areas where sensitive wildlife species are located.
• •
Revise Recommended Action Item "xxv" as follows:
"Incorporate natural resources studies and monitoring in the City's management
of public open spaces and related natural resources."
Goal 13: Energy Conservation
Add specific language that provides incentives for new development to incorporate green
building practices (solar panels, use of recycled materials, ect.)
Consider adding incentives and/or cost reduction for the use of public transportation.
ODFW would like to thank the City of Tigard for the opportunity to provide comments.
If you have any questions please contact me.
Thank you,
Mischa Connine
Habitat Biologist
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
503-621-3488 ext 28
Darren Wyss -(CPA) 2007-00001 110 • Page 1
EXHIBIT
From: "Dalby, John K." <John.Dalby @tvfr.com>
To: <darren @tigard-or.gov>
Date: 8/7/2007 8:48:54 AM
Subject: (CPA)2007-00001
Good morning Mr. Wyss,
After reviewing the submitted materials, our comments would be limited
to Planning Goal 6 and Planning Goal 13.
We would like the city to include language encouraging the installation
of automatic sprinkler systems in all buildings wherever and whenever
possible. The benefits with regard to the Planning Goals are:
Less water use for fighting hostile fires within buildings or
structures. Automatic sprinkler systems use a fraction of the water
necessary to control or extinguish a fire within a building or
structure.
Less contaminated runoff from firefighting operations polluting
surrounding streams and wetlands.
Feel free to wordsmith this language to best suit your document. OR,
could stop by your office and discuss it with you.
Thanks for your time.
John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II
Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue, North Division
14480 SW Jenkins Road
Beaverton, OR 97005-1152
503-356-4723
•
• •
EXHIBIT F
•
Definitions
Community Parks (Greater than 15 acres):
Community parks provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities for all age
groups. These parks are generally larger in size and serve a wider base of residents than
neighborhood parks. Community parks often include developed facilities for organized group
activity as well as facilities for individual and family activities. In addition to those amenities .
provided at neighborhood parks, community parks may include sports facilities for team play, group
picnic areas, skateboard and rollerblade facilities, natural areas, botanical gardens, amphitheaters,
festival space, swimming pools, interpretive facilities, and community centers. Higher quality
children's play areas may be provided to create a family play destination.
Effective Impervious Area
Impervious area such as rooftops, streets, sidewalks, and parking areas do not allow water to drain
into the soil. Impervious area that collects and drains the water directly to a stream or wetland
system via pipes or sheet flow is considered"effective impervious area", because it effectively drains
the landscape. Impervious area that drains to landscaping, swales, parks and other pervious areas is
considered "ineffective" because the water is allowed to infiltrate through the soil and into ground
water,without a direct connection to the stream or wetland.
Green Concepts and Practices
Refers to measures to increase re-use and recycling programs, on-site filtration,integrated pest
management, the utilising of new technologies for conservation and energy efficiency, and other
best management and operation practices.
Greenspace/Greenways (Size should be adequate to protect the resource):
A greenspace or greenway is an area of natural quality that protects valuable natural resources and
provides wildlife habitat. It also provides opportunities for nature-related outdoor recreation, such
as viewing and studying nature and participating in trail activities. Development features that
support outdoor recreation and trail-oriented recreation, such as trails, picnic areas, benches,
interpretive signs, and native landscaping, may be provided. Trail amenities, such as small scale
parking, portable restrooms,bike racks, and trash enclosures, may be included.
Linear Parks (Of adequate size to protect natural resources and accommodate intended uses):
Linear parks may be developed along built or natural corridors to provide opportunities for trail-
oriented outdoor recreation. Linear parks may also provide some active and passive recreation
facilities to meet neighborhood needs, especially in areas not adequately served by traditional
neighborhood parks. Linear parks connect residences to major community destinations. Linear
parks can include paved or soft-surface trails to accommodate jogging, biking, walking,
skateboarding, dog walking, horseback riding, canoeing or rollerblading. Active and passive
recreation facilities may include small-scale sports facilities, such as basketball hoops, public art,
picnic tables, lighting, community gardens, and landscaping.
Neighborhood Parks (4 to 14 acres):
Neighborhood parks are the foundation of the parks and recreation system, providing accessible
recreation and social opportunities to nearby residents. When developed to meet neighborhood
recreation needs, school sites may serve as neighborhood parks. Neighborhood Parks should
Definitions
Planning Commission Hearing 1 CPA2007-00001
• •
EXHIBIT F
include both passive and active recreation opportunities, such as children's play areas, informal
sports areas, picnic facilities, public art, open turf areas, landscaping, community gardens, and
pathways. Security lighting may be provided if needed.
Open Space
A term used interchangeably with Natural Area, and Parks is used interchangeably with
Parkland.
Park Services
A generic term used to refer to parks,recreation, trails, and open spaces collectively.
Parks System Development Charges
These are charges assessed to new developments for the acquisition and development of parks, open
spaces, and paved trails. They are assessed based on the cost of providing these services to new City
patrons.
Pocket Parks (2,500 square feet to 2 acres):
Pocket parks provide recreation opportunities for residents in areas not adequately served by
neighborhood parks, such as town centers or areas of high density development. Pocket parks may
include passive or low intensity activities, such as children's play areas, pathways, multi-use paved
areas, public art, small scale sports facilities, seating, picnic areas, community gardens, multi-purpose
performance space, and landscaping_
Special Use Area (variable depending on desired size)
Special use areas are public recreation lands that are specialized or single purpose in nature.
Examples are dog parks, skate parks, golf courses, display gardens, recreation centers, and a wide
range of other activities and facilities. City facilities that fall into this classification include Potso Dog
Park and the proposed Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park. Special use area is often a catch-all
category to place park facilities that do not meet any other definition.
Trails and Connectors
These are public access routes for commuting and trail-oriented recreational activities including
sidewalks, bikeways, multi-use trails, and paths. Width of the trail and right-of-way depends on its
intended use and location. A variety of pathway types are needed to accommodate activities such as
walking, running, biking, dog walking, rollerblading, skateboarding, and horseback riding. Trails can
be located within parks, within linear parks and greenways, or be designed as a part of the citywide
transportation system. Waterways can provide trail-like facilities for boating and canoeing. Each
type of trail should be designed to safely accommodate users, and meet recognized design standards.
Urban forest
Broadly defined as all the trees within the City collectively.
Definitions
Planning Commission Hearing 2 CPA2007-00001
• . 5),/. .
Planning Commission Hearing, 8/20/07
Typo Correction
Policy 8.1.2 The City shall acquire and, where appropriate, improve natural areas
located within a half mile of every Tigard resident to provide passive recreational
opportunities.
Revisions Recommended by Sue Bielke
Action Measure 8.1.xxxii: Include natural resource studie3 surveys and monitoring in
the City's management of public open spaces and related natural resources.
Policy 8.2.2: The City shall design and build greenway trails and paths to minimize
their impact on the environment, including afrd rare and state and federally listed
species
Revisions Recommend by Public Works
Reinstate the following stricken phases:
Action Measure 8.1.xxxii: When feasible and appropriate, Include natural resources
studies surveys and monitoring in the City's management of public open spaces and
related natural resources.
Action Measure 8.1.xxxiii: Remove and control non-native plants, including noxious
weeds, in natural areas, where feasible and appropriate.
Action Measure 8.2.vii: If adequate resources arc available, Use automated systems to
systematically map and document trail easements, right-of-way dedications, proposed
alignments, and current trail locations.
i/lrpin/duane/comp plan.park.dlcdc.staff changes
I •
-DRAFT-
Hazards
Natural features provide a community with valuable resources but, under certain conditions, these
resources may also present a hazard. For example,rivers and creeks are important for storm water
conveyance,wildlife habitat, and water quality. However, these resources can quickly threaten
property and people unless careful planning has documented flooding risk and adequate precautions
are taken. The City's commitment to protect people and property from hazards is based on Oregon
Statewide Planning Goal 7. Goal 7 lists six hazard categories to be addressed by comprehensive
plans. Four of these apply to the City of Tigard: wildfire,landslides, flooding, and earthquakes. In
addition, the City is also vulnerable to harm from severe weather and man-made hazards.
•
Goal 7: Areas Subject to Natural Hazards
"To protect people and proper ty from natural hazards."
Tigard's citizens value a safe community where natural resources are protected and there is minimal
danger from both natural and man-made hazards. Tigard residents value the importance of natural
systems in protecting the community from hazards, and additionally recognize that although
landslides, earthquakes,wildfires and floods occur naturally, the effects of these events are often
made worse by human activities.
Hazards can have a significant negative impact on a community's quality of life. It is important for
the Comprehensive Plan to provide policy direction on how the City will manage hazardous
conditions and events. Land use planning, development regulation and emergency management play
key roles in assessing and reducing the risk to people and property from hazards. It is important for
local governments to have an understanding of underlying natural conditions and past event history
to develop hazard mitigation and prevention programs.
Because hazards, such as earthquake faults and floodplains, extend across jurisdictional boundaries,
it is essential to coordinate planning and emergency response services regionwide and with the state
and federal governments. For example, due to the scale and complexity of earthquakes,Tigard
coordinates with the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). In
addition to DOGAMI,Tigard coordinates with Metro,Washington County, and other jurisdictions
to mitigate the risk associated with an earthquake. To minimize loss of life and property from
earthquakes, the City requires all new commercial,industrial, and multifamily structures to conform
to Oregon Structural Specialty Code requirements for Zone 3 (the second highest hazard code),
while single-family construction must conform to the Oregon One and Two Dwelling Specialty
Code for seismic category Dl.
In Tigard,wildfire is characterized by the Urban Interface Zone, or the urban-rural fringe where
homes and other structures are built onto a densely forested or natural landscape. The Oregon
Department of Forestry implements the Oregon Forestland-Urban Interface Fire Program,which is
expected to be fully implemented by 2011, in order to protect interface communities in Oregon
from wildfire. The City of Tigard works with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) to mitigate
the effects of wildfire. TVF&R is responsible for all fire prevention and education, and has the
opportunity to comment on all development applications. TVF&R also maps the urban interface
zone in Tigard. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) controls both backyard
and agricultural burning in Oregon; however,Tigard is within the DEQ permanent burn-ban area in
an effort to reduce the risk of wildfire as a result of backyard burning.
1
• •
-DRAFT-
People and property are best protected from landslide when building structures and roads are not
built within areas prone to mass movement. Although landslides are a natural geologic process, the
incidence of landslides and their impacts on people can be exacerbated by human activities. Such
human activities include grading for road construction and development, excavation, drainage and
groundwater alterations, and changes in vegetation. By mapping steep slopes and allowing only
appropriate development in these areas the City can limit the impact of landslides on the
community. Also, by retaining vegetation and natural drainageways in these areas, the City can work
to reduce conditions which may lead to landslides. The effects of landslides are often more
widespread than the physical area they inhabit, as landslides can affect utility services, transportation
systems, and critical lifelines.
Floods are influenced by a number of factors,including the amount and intensity of precipitation,
geography and geology, and development activity. The City of Tigard cannot control precipitation or
the community's soil type but can control development activity which contributes to, and is affected
by, flooding. The City coordinates with several agencies to mitigate the risk of flooding. The FEMA
designated floodplain is used to administer the national flood insurance program (NFIP). The
floodplain serves as the FEMA flood hazard regulatory area. Within this area,development activities
are regulated to minimize impacts on floodwater flows and storage areas to reduce impacts from
flood events. Oregon state law regulates development within the 100-year floodplain and Tigard
complies through adoption of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan,Title 3. The
Sensitive Lands chapter of the Tigard Community Development Code implements Title 3 through
the Clean Water Services' Design and Construction Standards.
Floods can have a devastating impact on almost every aspect of the community,including private
property damage, public infrastructure damage, and economic loss from business interruption. The
City has been proactive in mitigating flood hazards by purchasing floodplain property. These areas,
if left undisturbed, can act to store excess floodwater. The Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL),
jointly with the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,requires a permit for development within the waters
of the United States.Any disturbance to a water body and its associated floodplain is covered
through this process.
Tigard is also at risk of non-natural or man-made hazards. Although statewide planning goal 7
addresses natural hazards, other hazards are included in this chapter as the community is concerned
about protection from non-natural hazards as well as natural hazards. Other hazards addressed by
this section may include mass casualty transportation accidents, hazardous material releases, severe
storms, terrorism, epidemics, and infestation. Tigard coordinates planning for non-natural
hazardous occurrences with other jurisdictions and agencies from around the state.
Key Findings
•
• The Cascadia Subduction Zone could potentially cause an 8+ magnitude earthquake, affecting
Tigard.
• Tigard is subject to more frequent shallow earthquakes (crustal fault earthquakes). These events
typically do not exceed magnitude 4,but could go up to magnitude 7.
• Fifty-eight percent of the City is subject to the greatest earthquake hazard level,with an
additional 21% falling into the next hazard level. These areas include developed residential and
commercial areas, as well as the Washington Square Regional Center.
2
• -DRAFT- •
• Wood-frame homes tend to withstand earthquakes better than unreinforced brick buildings.
• The City of Tigard requires all new commercial,industrial, and multifamily structures to
conform to Oregon Structural Specialty Code requirements for Seismic Zone 3,while single-
family construction must conform to the Oregon One and Two Family Dwelling Specialty Code
for Seismic Category Dl.
• The increasing number of homes being built in the urban interface zone is increasing the threat
of wildfire in Tigard. More than 30% of all land in Tigard is vulnerable to wildfire.
• Tigard is within the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality's permanent burn ban area,
so backyard burning is not allowed anywhere within Tigard.
• The most common type of landslide in Washington County is caused by erosion.
• Landslides within Tigard have historically not caused major property damage. However in other
parts of the Portland metropolitan region they have caused considerable damage.
• It is estimated about 3% of the City's land, or 286 acres,is vulnerable to landslides. In addition,
about 4.3 miles of critical streets could be subject to landslide damage.
• Human activities such as deforestation, stream alteration, and urban development within the
Tualatin basin have significantly altered the hydrology of the watershed. This has resulted in
increased water runoff and greater potential for flooding.
• Floods are Oregon's most frequently occurring natural disaster.
• The 100-year floodplain includes six streams and 7.9% of all land area in Tigard. The last major
flood event in 1996 inundated 2.2% of the land area in Tigard.
• As of June 2006,Tigard owns 34% of the 100-year floodplain.
• Tigard residents are concerned about the effects of all other hazards on the community.
Goal
7.1 Protect people and property from flood,landslide, earthquake,wildfire,and severe weather
hazards.
Policies
1. The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations
except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to
a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development:
A. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential;
B. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides, or movement;
C. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or
D. Areas having severe weak foundation soils.
2. The City shall promote the use of non-structural approaches to hazard mitigation.
3. The City shall coordinate land use and public facility planning with public safety providers
(law enforcement, fire safety, and emergency service providers) to ensure their capability to
respond to hazard events.
4. The City shall design and construct public facilities to withstand hazardous events with a
priority on hazard protection of public services and facilities that are needed to provide
emergency response services.
5. The City shall apply and enforce building code standards to protect the built environment
from natural disasters and other hazards.
3
• •
-DRAFT-
6. The City shall enforce standards requiring the creation and maintenance of defensible space
around habitable structures located in wildfire hazard areas.
7. The City shall comply with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood
regulations,which include standards for base flood levels, flood proofing, and minimum
finished floor elevations.
8. The City shall prohibit any land form alterations or developments in the 100-year floodplain
which would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain.
9. The City shall not allow land form alterations or development within the 100-year floodplain
outside the zero-foot rise floodway unless:
A. The streamflow capacity of the zero-foot rise floodway is maintained, and
B. Engineered drawings and/or documentation shows there will be no detrimental
upstream or downstream effects in the floodplain area.
10. The City shall work with Clean Water Services to protect natural drainageways and wetlands
as valuable water retention areas and,where possible, find ways to restore and enhance these
areas.
11. The City shall comply with Metro Title 3 Functional Plan requirements for balanced fill and
removal in the floodplain.
12. The City shall minimize impervious surfaces to reduce storm water runoff.
13. The City shall retain and restore existing vegetation with native species in areas with
landslide potential to the greatest extent possible.
14. The City shall work to reduce the risk of loss of life and damage to property from severe
weather events.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Place land acquisition priorities on high hazard areas to be used for recreation or open space
purposes.
ii. Update and maintain accurate information regarding natural hazard risks and past events.
iii. Publicize and maintain maps of high hazard areas.
iv. Address planning for the protection of public facilities and services from hazards in the
Tigard Public Facilities Plan and Community Investment Plan.
v. Retrofit existing public facilities and services to contemporary standards to better withstand
natural disasters and hazardous occurrences.
vi. Recognize some existing buildings have not been built to contemporary building code
standards and seek ways to encourage their retrofit to modern codes.
vii. Design and Implement a natural hazards home inspection program.
viii.Update and maintain a list of essential and critical facilities to be used in hazards planning.
ix. Work with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Community Safety Program to provide
4
• -DRAFT- •
information and education about urban interface wildfire to Tigard citizens.
x. Adopt the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Wildfire Hazard Map and implement section
R324 of the Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
xi. Provide information and access to resources for property owners who wish to assess the
ability of their buildings to withstand natural hazards.
xii. Continue to maintain eligibility for the National Flood Insurance Program.
Goal
7.2 Protect people and property from non-natural hazardous occurrences.
Policies
1. The City shall design, construct, and coordinate the surface transportation system to reduce
the potential for mass casualty accidents and to provide the ability to evacuate when
necessary.
2. The City shall encourage communication and coordination among a wide variety of agencies
to respond to technological and man-made disasters.
Recommended Action Measures
i. Keep a current inventory of locations where hazardous materials might pose a danger to the
public,including storage and transportation areas.
ii. Update and maintain the Tigard Emergency Operations Plan to ensure essential governance and
public safety services are available during a'disaster.
iii. Continue to work with the Washington County Office of Emergency Management to:
A. Coordinate emergency preparedness education for Tigard residents,
B. Provide ongoing responder training and exercises,
C. Coordinate regionwide hazards response, and
D. Provide hazards information and resources countywide.
iv. Continue to implement the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program for
community members and City staff.
v. Encourage projects that enhance medical treatment capabilities and capacity.
5
---{Formatted:Top: 0.5" J
TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS
REVISED AS OF 6/21/2007
REVISED AS OF 7/16/2007
REVISED AS OF 8/10/2007
HAZARDS
GOAL: 1. PROTECT PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM FLOOD, LANDSLIDE, EARTHQUAKE AND WILDFIRE HA
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Protect life and property from hazards by preventing 5.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas
or minimizing the risk of hazardous occurrences. having the following development limitations - Comment:Group preference is to
---- define hazard areas by Map and not
except where it can be shown that established and by text,(2 green Dots) For the
Other Building Blocks (actions and results): proven engineering techniques related to a specific following reasons,Staftrecom
against defining landslide hazards rds by by •
• Prevent development that would pose danger to site plan will make the area suitable for the Map:
1.MAP SCALE:The scale of the map
life and property in areas where hazards cannot be proposed development: will have an impact on whether a
sensitive lands review is necessary.
mitigated. (3,green dots) a. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential 2.MAP ERROR:In the event that
b. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides,or there is an error on our map,we are
still covered by the text.
• Developers have the burden of proof to show movement;
that hazards can be mitigated to the extent c. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%;or
necessary not to endanger life and property. (1 d. Areas having severe weak foundation soils.
green dot, 1 yellow dot)
5.1.2 The City shall coordinate land use and public
• Promote the use of non-structural approaches to facility planning with public safety providers (law
hazard mitigation. (2gi>;en dots) enforcement, fire safety,and emergency service
providers) to ensure their capability to respond to
• Land acquisition priorities on thigh hazard areas to hazard events. (1 green dot) ,l Comment:Need to clarify the
be used for recreation or open space purposes. (2
definition of high hazard areas.
green dots) 5.1.3 The City shall promote the use of non-structural
approaches to hazard mitigation. (1,green dot •
• Coordinate land use and public facility planning
with public safety providers (law enforcement, fire Action Measures:
safety, and emergency service providers) to ensure 5.1.1 Place land acquisition priorities on high hazard
their capability to respond to hazard events. (3 _ areas to be used for recreation or open space
•
green dots) purposes. (1 green dot)
• 'Maintain accurate information regarding natural 5.1.2 Update and maintain accurate information_regardin
hazard risks and past events. (2 green dots) ; natural hazard risks and past events. - Comment-Specify which maps are`1
used,need to make it easy for the )I
public to find relevant maps.
5.1.3 Publicize and maintain maps of high hazard areas.L--- Comment:Although the maps may
not be used to define high Hazard
areas,the maps are very useful in
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES: illustrating such areas.
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Public Facilities!need protection from destruction or 5.1.4 The City shall design and construct public facilities--- comment:Whatatabout enforcement
on private facilities,i.e.private roads?
damage by hazardous conditions. to withstand hazardous events with a priority on
Comment:Define and add public
hazard protection of public services and facilities facilities to the glossary list.
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) • that are needed to provide emergency response
• Have as a priority hazard protection of public services. (1 given Dot) •
services and facilities that are needed to provide •
emergency response services. (3 green dots) Action Measures:
5.1.4 Address planning for the protection of public
• • Design and construct public facilities to withstand facilities and services from hazards in the Tigard
hazardous events. (3 green dots) Public Facilities Plan and Community Investment
Plan. (1 green Dot)
• Retrofit existing facilities and services to
contemporary standards to better withstand 5.1.4 Retrofit existing public facilities and services to ---{Formatted:Bullets and Numbering
natural disasters and hazardous occurrences. (2 contemporary standards to better withstand natural
green dots) disasters and hazardous occurrences. (1 green Dot,
lyetlow dot)
• Community issue:The citizens of Tigard are
concerned about the future of public services, 5.1.5 Design and Implement a natural hazards home •----{Formatted:Bullets and Numbering
which includes safety, schools and infrastructure. inspection program.
* (1 yellow dot)
• Address planning for the protection of public •
facilities and services from hazards in the Tigard
Public Facilities Plan and Community Investment
Plan. (1 yellow dot)
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Contemporary building codes protect the built 5.1.5 The City shall apply and enforce building code
environment and human life from natural disasters standards to protect the built environment from
such as earthquakes and flood events) natural disasters and other hazards. - - comment.Does the City have an
-- - - - inventory of hazardous buildings?
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) Action Measures:
• Apply and enforce building code standards to 5.1.6 Recognize some existing buildings have not beer.,.-.-"Comment:Is the degree of the
codes enforced in Tigard above or
protect the built environment from natural built to contemporary building code standards and`, below average?Should we strive to
disasters and other hazards. (3 pun dots) seek ways to encourage their retrofit to modern be above average? _
codes. (1 green Dot) I Formatted:Bullets and Numbering
• Recognize that existing buildings have not been
built to contemporary building code standards and 5.1.7 Update and maintain a list of essential and critical----{Formatted:Bullets and Numbering ) •
seek ways to encourage their retrofit to modern facilities to be used in hazards planning.
codes. (2 green dots Comment:Home Inspections
5 1.8 -Provide information and access to resources for Comment:Natural Hazard Home
property owners who wish to assess the ability of Inspections have been recommended by the Policy Interest Team.Building
their buildings to withstand natural hazards. (1 gren Staff recommends against
7 yellow Dot) Inspections for the following reasons:
1.LIABILITY:If the City inspected a
home and found it to be'safe"from
hazards,and the structure was later
■ damaged during a hazard event,the
■ City could be found table for the
damages.
2.EXPERTISE:To tell whether a
property owner is truly safe from
hazards requires expertise beyond
that of the building Department.For
example,a structural Engineer or
geotechnical engineer has the
knowledge to determine whether a
house is truly safe from earthquake or
■ landslide hazards.
Formatted:Bullets and Numbering
Formatted:Font:Not Italic j •
•
•
•
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Protect life and property from the growing hazards of 5.1.6 The City shall enforce standards requiring the
urban interface wildfires. creation and maintenance of defensible space
around habitable structures located in wildfire
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) hazard areas. (1 yellow Dot)
• Education is a key component in reducing the risk
of urban interface wildfire. (2 green dots) Action Measures:
5.1.6 Work with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
• Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Public Safety Goal 1, Community Safety Program to provide information
strategy#6 is that fire safety education will be and education about urban interface wildfire to
effectively promoted in the community. (1 yellow Tigard citizens. (1 yellow Dot)
dot) •
5.1.7 Adopt the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Wildfire
• Work with the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Hazard Map and implement(section R324 of the
Community Safety Program to provide Oregon Residential Specialty Cod4 (2 green Dots) ---{Comment:Add explanation
information and education about urban interface
wildfire to Tigard citizens. (1 green dot)
• Enforce standards requiring the cutting of tall
grass and combustible debris removal. (1 green, 1
yellow dot)
•
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Reduce the risk to people and property from 5.1.7 The City shall comply with the Federal Emergency
flooding. (1 green dot) Management Agency (FEMA) flood regulations,
which include standards for base flood levels, flood
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) proofing, and minimum finished floor elevations. (7
• Comply with The Federal Emergency green Dot)
Management Association (FEMA) flood
regulations, which include standards for base 5.1.8 The City shall prohibit any land form alterations or
flood levels, flood proofing,and minimum developments in the 100-year floodplain which
finished floor elevations,etc. (2 green dots) would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year
floodplain. (1 green Dot)
• Update flood information as it becomes available.' ---(Comment:This information needs to •
- -(1 yellow dot) 5.1.9 The City shall not allow land form alterations or be easy for residents to access.
development within the 100-year floodplain outside
• Comply with Metro Title 3 Functional Plan the zero-foot rise floodway unless: (1 green Dot)
balanced removal fill requirements. (2 yellow dots) a. The streamflow capacity of the zero-foot
rise floodway is maintainted,and
• Protect natural drainageways and wetlands as b. Engineered drawings and/or
valuable water retention areas and where possible documentation shows that there will be no
find ways to restore these areas. (1 green dot) detrimental upstream or downstream
effects in the floodplain area.
• Community Value: The citizens of Tigard value
trees and natural resources and feel that protecting 5.1.10 The City shall protect natural drainageways and
these resources will benefit the community. * (1 wetlands as valuable water retention areas and
green dot) where possible find ways to restore these areas. (1
green Dot)
• Emergency access is important to maintain to
areas that are subject to flooding. (1 yellow dot) 5.1.11 The City shall comply with Metro Title 3
Functional Plan requirements for balanced fill and •
• Minimize impervious surfaces to reduce storm removal in the floodplain. (1 green Dot)
water runoff. (1 yellow dot)
5.1.12 The City shall work with Clean Water Services to
•
• Work with Clean Water Services to preserve the preserve the natural storm water drainageways to
• ! natural storm water drainageways to reduce the reduce the potential for flooding.
potential for flooding. (1 green dot)
5.1.14 The City shall minimize impervious surfaces to
reduce storm water runoff. (2 green dots)! - Comment:Moved from landslide
section.
Action Measures:
5.1.8 Continue to participate in the National Flood
Insurance Program.
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES: •
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Protect people and property from slow moving and 5.1.13 The City shall retain existing vegetation in areas
rapidly moving landslides. with landslide potential to the greatest extent
possible. (1 green dot)
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) - Deleted:5.1.14 The City shall minimize
impervious surfaces to reduce Sturm water
• Retain existing vegetation in areas with landslide Action Measures: runoff.1
potential to the greatest extent possible. (2 green
dots)
• Enforce standards that prevent or minimize the
potential for landslides. (1 green dot)
•
•
•
•
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Protect people and property from severe weather. 5.1.8 The City shall work to reduce the risk of loss of life
. and damage to property from severe weather
Other Building Blocks (actions and results) events.
• Metro defines severe weather as including
"windstorms.severe winter hazards (e.g. snow, Action Measures:
ice. prolonged cold),thunderstorms.tornadoes,
drought. prolonged extreme heat and other
weather conditions that disrupt vital regional
systems and threaten lives and property."
• Weather hazards are not included in the Statewide
Land Use Planning Goal 7: Natural Hazards. •
• The usual predictability of these events reduces ---{Formatted:Bullets and Numbering
their risk to life because people can take
precautionary measures (Metro Regional Hazard
Mitigation Policy and Planning Guide).
•
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS:
GOAL: 2. PROTECT PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM NON-NATURAL HAZARDOUS OCCURRENCES.
POLICY BUILDING BLOCKS: DRAFT POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES:
Policy Principle (Cornerstone): Policies:
Non-natural hazardous occurrences can pose danger 5.2.1 The City shall design,construct,and coordinate the
to human life and property.These events can surface transportation system to reduce the
include: potential for mass casualty accidents and to provide
• Mass casualty transportation accidents, the ability to evacuate when necessary.
• Hazardous material releases,
• Severe storms, 5.2.2 The City shall encourage communication and -- Comment:Move to the natural
• Terrorism,, coordination among wide variety of agencies to hazards goal
g ry g Deleted:and •
• Epidemics and respond to technological and man-made disasters. _ _ =
(3 green dots) capabilities and capacity.
• A hazard mitigation plan coordinated with a
variety of other agencies including the state and
federal government is essential.
• It is important to inventory the locations where
the hazardous materials might pose a danger to
the public. This includes storage areas and
transportation routes. (2 green dots)
• Public education,awareness and self-sufficiency
are important.
• The key to recovery is the maintenance of •
essential governance and public safety services.
• Maintain diycrsc healthy,integrated systems. (2
green dots)
•
• •
I� .
TIGARD 2027
City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan
Resource Document A of the Tigard 2007 resource report provided a summary of
community surveys and work completed by Tigard Beyond Tomorrow. The summary
outlined a number of key issues and values that the community has identified and it forms a
solid foundation for updating the City's Comprehensive Plan. Below is a list of community
issues and values developed from Resource Document A (which can be found in its entirety
at www.tigard-or.gov/2027). Please review the list as it will provide important background
information when discussing goals,policies,and action measures:
COMMUNITY VALUES
The citizens of Tigard value the location of the community and the ease of access to travel
options.
The citizens of Tigard value the safe and quiet residential atmosphere of the community and
the character of their neighborhoods.
The citizens of Tigard value trees and natural resources and feel that protecting these
resources will benefit the community.
The citizens of Tigard value the public services that are provided to the community,
particularly the library,parks, senior center,and police.
The citizens of Tigard value pedestrian and bicycle paths in the community and support the
development of a well connected network.
The citizens of Tigard value access to neighborhood parks and open space within a half mile
from their home.
The citizens of Tigard value access to bus service in the community.
The citizens of Tigard value the community's downtown core and support investment to
make improvements.
The citizens of Tigard value and understand their responsibility to participate as members of
the community.
1
• •
The citizens of Tigard value access to educational opportunities for citizens of all ages.
The citizens of Tigard value small and local businesses that contribute to a healthy economy.
COMMUNITY ISSUES
The citizens of Tigard have identified traffic congestion as the top concern in the
community.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the maintenance of community streets.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about preserving community livability by minimizing
neighborhood traffic.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about population increases and the impact upon the
community.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about growth and development in the community and
the compatibility between new and existing development.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned with the community's appearance,particularly the
downtown.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned that the community's downtown is not living up to its
potential.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the impact of growth on the community's
natural resources.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the future of public services,which includes
safety, schools and infrastructure.
The citizens of Tigard are concerned about the lack of a recreation program and the number
of parks in the community.
2
• •
3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE
This chapter addresses a broad range of topics all having to do with the natural resources located within the
Tigard Urban Planning Area. This chapter reflects the concerns expressed in several of the Statewide Planning
Goals including:
Goal #3 - Agricultural Lands; Goal #4 - Forest Land; Goal #5 - Open Spaces; Scenic and
Historic Areas and Natural Resources; Goal - Areas subject to Natural Disasters and
Hazards;and Goal#8- Recreational Needs.
The natural environments within the planning area offer many opportunities for a unique and healthy urban
development. Those environments, when viewed as a series of systems rather than isolated features, will
provide Tigard with those elements necessary for a healthy place in which to live, work and play. Floodplain
greenways, for example, can provide the community with an excellent system of open space links between
neighborhoods and services, in addition to providing a relatively inexpensive system for storm water runoff. It is
to the community's benefit that consideration be given to both the opportunities and the limitations of the
various environments within the planning area.
The natural environments included within the planning area all have their own respective limitations with regard
to urbanization. Development pressure upon lands with such limitations can have profound effects on the
environment. Erosion of steep slopes caused by inappropriate development,for instance, does not occur as an
isolated incident. Soil type, permeability, vegetation and drainage all play major roles in and are effected by
development. Likewise,the effects of inappropriate development located within the floodplain areas could have
adverse effects on properties both up and down stream from the development site. The social, cultural and
economic values of such resource lands could be reduced by the effects of urban development nearby. The
limitations of the various environments should be considered in reviewing new development within the planning
area.
The recognition of the natural environment in the planning area and the development of findings and policies
which address the characteristics of the environment are extremely important elements in the Comprehensive
Plan. The purpose of this chapter is to define the parameters of the various natural environments in the
planning area and to identify the limitations and opportunities inherent in those environments.
Additional information on this topic is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report: Natural Features and
Open Spaces."
3.1 - - - e• -, - - ._ • e WETLANDS
€indings
and density of development which sag be aosehwheclated eg that property (carrying capacity).
6embinationc sash as steep slopes and twistable soils create severe development senstraints-
€xsessive development in 69614 physically limited areas greatly increases the petegtial severity of
natural habitation of wildlife- Nonetheless; it is too often removed and replaced by buildings Of
. -- - -•development- - =- ::•_ -• = •••• -- - - - =, - - - -
lnsreased runoff and sedimentation #rem pearly developed hillsides sag require increased public
Vol. II, Policy 3-1
•
• •
- - ..
POLICY
3.1.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT ALLOW DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS HAVING THE FOLLOWING
DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS EXCEPT WHERE IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT ESTABLISHED
AND PROVEN ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES RELATED TO A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WILL
MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. (NOTE: THIS POLICY
DOES NOT APPLY TO LANDS DESIGNATED AS SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS ON THE
FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS MAP.):
a. AREAS MEETING THE DEFINITION OF WETLANDS UNDER CHAPTER 18.26 OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE;
b. _ -e .. • ;
s AREAS SUBJECT TO SLUMPING, EARTH SLIDES OR MOVEMENT;
d AREAS HAVING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%;OR
- • ' _ _ - .
(Rev. Ord. 85-13; Ord. 84-36)
a -- •- - - - - ---•- - -- - " - • • -
site specific sail surveys and geologic shies where potential hazafds afe idleetifiod fused
-
special design considerations and senctfactier4 cheaseres be taken to offset the soil and geologic•-- - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - •- -- . (Rev. Ord. 85 13)
FLOODPLAINS
Vol. II, Policy 3-2
properties;and
• • - - •- - •••• - = - - - • -- - = - - -- • -- . Peed-i4330646•
• - • - --- -=•= - - - - - - - ' - = - -- - - --
fate:
.- - -
levels-
• - - -= • •A . - - -- =
- '- -- -- • -- - = • - '°-- - - - - .. . The--federal
• The Gity of ward currently laas efdiaanses; peGsles and standards within the ward Co ity•• - •- ' - • - - ' -- - • - - •--- .. - _- -• - •- , '--- - -
- .. . •
- -- -- - - - - - • -- -- --- - ..•- -
are-taker.
(Rev.Ord-851.3)
POLICIES
324 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT ANY LAND FROM ALTERATIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN WHICH WOULD RESULT IN ANY RISE IN €6EVATION OF THE
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN.
3,24 THE CITY SHALL:
EXCEPT ALTERATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED WHICH PRESERVE OR ENHANCE THE
.. . . ., L _. . . A_ -- _-. _aa . _ ..■ . . •. L .
I ALLOW LAID FARM DEVELOPMENT IN T-14g CI 00flP1 AIN*
OUTSIDE T•HE ZERO-POO; RISE FLOODWAY* WHICH PRESERVE OR ENHANCE
Vol. II, Policy 3-3
•
4.4413 FORM ALTERATION AND/OR DEVELOPMENT IS IN AN AREA
DESICNATED 6OMMERGIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ON TI4E COMPREHENSIVE
SATISFIED; OR
3- THE LAND FORM ALTERATION AND/OR DEVELOPMENT tS ASSOCIATED
WITH COMMUNITY RECREATION USES, UTILITIES, OR PUBLIC SUPPORT
FACILITIES AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER 4343 OE THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN POLICY 3.2.3 CAN
BE SATISFIED.
3-24 WHERE LAND FORM ALTERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT ARE ALLOWED WITHIN T445
.. _ . ..■- . . * . ■_ - -'. _.. - _ ..■ . * --
REQUIRE:
a- THE STREAPAPLOW CAPACITY OF THE ZERO-FOOT RISE FI n, Y= $E
MAINTAINED•
la, -• _ • ■ ■- . , . __ a e- ee_ •,-. • e. _-e • • _ - •
BE NG DETRIMENTAL UPSTREAM OR DOWNETREAM EFFECTS 4N THE
FLOODPLAIN* AREA, AND THAT TIDE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SENSITIVE
LANDS SECTION OF THE CODE HAVE BEEN MET(Soo FIS Soptomber 1981);
e- A BUFFER, EITHER EXISTING OR PLANTED, ON THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL
LAND ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND WHICH ADEQUATELY SCREENS THE
DEVELOPMENT FROM VIEW BY THE ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL LAND, AND WHICH
THE GONEIDERATION O€ DEDICATION OP OPEN LAND AREA FOR GREENWAY
ADJOINING THE FLOODPLAIN* INCLUDING PORTIONS AT A SUITABLE ELEVATION
OR THE OP A PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PATHWAY WITHIN THE
FLOODPLAIN* IN AGGORDANGE WITH THE O A^r.�^D PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE
PATHWAY PLAN.
34-4 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN AREAS DESIGNATED AS
SIGNIFICANT WET DS ON THE FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS MAR NO
DEVELOPMENT SHALL OCCUR ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AREAS DESIGNATED AS
FIVE (25) FEET OF THE DESIGNATED WETLANDS AREA. DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY
ADJACENT TO EIGNI.PIGANT WETLANDS SHALL BE ALLOWED UNDER THE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT SECTION OF THE CODE.
3.2.5 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THE QONSIDERATION OP DEDICATION O€ ALL
UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN THE 100 YEAR F' OODPLAIN PLUS SUFFICIENT OPEN
LAND FOR GREENWAY PURPOSES-SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED FOR RECREATION WITHIN
THE PLAN.
(Rov.Ord. 05 01; Ord. 98 19; Ord. 90 22;Ord. 85 13; Ord. 81 36)
3.3 NATURAL RESOURCES
Findings
• Currently, there are extensive rock and gravel extraction areas located to the north and west of Tigard's
planning area within Beaverton and Washington County.
(Rev. Ord. 01-07)
• There is one active mineral or aggregate resource within the Tigard Planning Area, known as the
Durham Pits,which is operated by Washington County.
Vol. II, Policy 3-4
• •
• , COMMUNITY
NEWSPAPEXS CITY OF TIGARD
. 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222• PO OREGON
Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269
Phone:503-684-0360 Fax:503-620-3433 TIGARD
Email: legals @commnewspapers.com PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning
Commission on Monday August 20.2007 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon.
State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS Public oral or written testimony is invited. The public hearing on
this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of procedure
adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of
I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, procedure set forth in Section 18.390.060.E. The Planning
depose and say that I am the Accounting Commission's review is for the purpose of making a recommen-
Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, dation to the City Council on the request. The Council will then
Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of hold a public hearing on the request prior to making a decision.
general circulation, published at Beaverton, in Further information may be obtained from the City of Tigard
the aforesaid county and state, as defined by Planning Division(Staff contact: Darren Wyss)at 13125 SW Hall
Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-639-4171.
ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)2007-00001
City of Tigard Tigard Comprehensive Plan Update of Statewide Planning Goal 6:
CPA 2007-00001 Air, Water, and Land Quality Resources, Goal 8: Recreation
TT11002 Needs,and Goal 13: Energy Conservation-
REQUEST: Amendments to the current Comprehensive Plan
a copy of which is hereto annexed, was Topics 3:Natural Features and Open Space;4:Air,Water,and
published in the entire issue of said Land Resources Quality;and 9:Energy by updating the goals,
newspaper for policies and recommended action measures to reflect current
1 community conditions and values. The complete text of the
weeks in the following issues proposed Amendment can be viewed on the City's website at
August 2, 2007
http://www.tigard-or.gov/code amendments. LOCATION:
Citywide. ZONE: CBD,C-G,C-P,I-H,I-L,I-P,MUC,MUE,
MUE-1,MUE-2,MUR-1,MUR-2,R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5,R-
7, R-12, R-25. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
( kav ( f``-f/„L Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370,
18.380, 18.390, 18.705, 18.715, 18.765, 18.775 and 18.810;
Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manage Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,3 &4;Metro Functional Plan
p ( g g ) Title 3 and 13; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5 and 6.
Publish 8/2/2007 TT11002
August 2, 2007
NOTAR PUBLIC FOR OREGON
My commission expires
, Q0O7
Acct#10093001 r OFFICIAL SEAL
Doreen McLaughlin -^ SUZETTE I CURRAN ()
City of Tigard 1 . NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
13125 SW Hall Blvd. COMMISSION NO.373063
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28,20071
Tigard, OR 97223
Size:2 x 5.75
Amount Due $96.02
'Remit to address above
•
•
N
Tigard Planning Commission
Agenda Item # S. I Page I of Date of Hearing -0`1
Case Numbers) erPf 2 0 D7- n 0001
Case Name ecn r,�ir° r V f / h !A p cd T i
Location C1` (�-
If you would like to speak on this item, please PRINT your name,
address,.and zip code below:
Proponent (for the proposal): Opponent (against the proposal):
Name: C W IT Ze-( Name:
Address: /03 / 0 5L1/4) 4.0@i v IE".7 D R . Address:
City, State, Zip:-/-164vizsv, 17 Z 2 J City, State, Zip:
Name:),,a4 ���„� Name:
Address:in 4 4-c --)v Address:
City, State, Zip: '2, )C 092-1-2.3 City, State, Zip:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip:
•
Agenda Item:
Hearing Date: August 20,2007 Time: 7:00 PM
STAFF REPORT TO THE
a
PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T I GARD
120 DAYS = N/A
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO UPDATE GOALS,
POLICIES,AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES
PERTAINING TO STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 6:AIR,WATER,
AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY,GOAL 8: RECREATIONAL
NEEDS,AND GOAL 13: ENERGY CONSERVATION
FILE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) CPA2007-00001
PROPOSAL: The City is requesting approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend
the current Comprehensive Plan Topics 3: Natural Features and Open Space; 4:
Air, Land, and Water Resources Quality; and 9: Energy by updating the Goals,
Policies, and Recommended Action Measures to reflect current community
conditions and values.
APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: N/A
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
LOCATION: Citywide
ZONING
DESIGNATION: All City zoning districts
COMP PLAN: All City comprehensive plan designations
APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390;
Comprehensive Plan Topics 1,2,3, 4, 8,and 9;Metro Functional Plan
Title 3 and 13;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12,and 13.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission finds this request to meet the necessary approval
criteria.Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL to the Tigard City Council to amend the Tigard
Comprehensive Plan to replace Topics 4 and 9 and Sections 3.5 and 3.6 of Topic 3 as determined
through the public hearing process.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 1 OF 22
• •
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Project History
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan is the primary document that guides land use decisions within the
community. It outlines goals, policies, and recommended action measures that are intended to
reflect the community's values and aspirations for a broad range of matters relating to land use
planning and growth management. It also aims to organize and coordinate the relationships
between people, land, resources, and facilities to meet the current and future needs of Tigard.
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan is required by State law and must conform to 12 of the 19 Oregon
Statewide Planning Goals. Land development and related activities, including the City's
development codes, also must be consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
It is now seven years beyond the year 2000 planning horizon of the City's 1983 Comprehensive
Plan. Tigard has grown dramatically since 1983, from 18,379 residents to 46,300 today. Jobs and
business activity have grown just as fast. Although minor updates have taken place over the years,
the 1983 Plan, in many ways, does not reflect current and projected community conditions. For this
reason, it is necessary to undertake a thorough update. This is important to ensure the Plan remains
a viable tool for decision-makers and citizens to use when seeking policy direction regarding land
use and Tigard's future. For this reason, the Tigard City Council has made it a goal to update the
Comprehensive Plan.
The first step in updating the Tigard Comprehensive Plan involved City staff developing a fact base
to inform the update. The result was the Tigard 2007 resource document completed in February
2007. Key findings from Tigard 2007, combined with community issues and values, form the basis
for Plan goals, policies, and recommended action measures. Community issues and values were
identified through the community's visioning process and a number of surveys completed over the
last several years.
The second step involved community volunteers and stakeholders coming together to develop
draft goals, policies, and recommended action measures. These Policy Interest Teams have been
meeting over the past several months to discuss Comprehensive Plan topics in which they share an
interest. City Department Review Teams then review and provide comment on the work of the
policy interest teams. These final draft goals, policies, and recommended action measures are then
forwarded to the Planning Commission to begin the legislative process.
The final step is the legislative process. Since each of the Policy Interest Teams are moving at their
own pace, Staff will be bringing a series of Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) through the
legislative process over the next several months. Each CPA will correspond to a Statewide
Planning Goal that is applicable to Tigard. The CPA will strike the appropriate language from the
existing plan and replace the language with an updated chapter that addresses that particular
Statewide Planning Goal.
The first three chapters to begin the legislative process are Environmental Quality (Goal 6), Parks,
Recreation, Trails, and Open Space (Goal 8), and Energy Conservation (Goal 13). The Planning
Commission held a workshop on July 16 to discuss the draft goals, policies, and recommended
action measures that were formulated based on the input from the policy interest and department
review teams. At the Planning Commission workshop, the following changes were requested (also
found in Exhibit A with deleted text as strikeouts and added text bold and underlined):
•
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 2 OF 22
• •
Environmental Quality Section 1: Air Resources Quality
Interest in exploring a City public transit system to connect with TriMet was expressed and the
Planning Commission requested an action measure to develop a committee to pursue this idea.
Recommended Action Measure xi was added per this request.
xi. Develop an ongoing committee to evaluate a Tigard public transportation system
that would connect underserved neighborhoods with TriMet routes.
The Planning Commission requested that schools be added to Recommended Action Measure vii.
vu. Place educational materials in the schools, Tigard Public Library, and City Hall that
demonstrate actions individuals can implement to help improve air quality in the
community.
The Planning Commission asked staff to be more specific about Recommended Action Measure x
to identify gas-powered leaf blowers.
x. Research the feasibility of banning gas-powered leaf blowers and a buyback program for
petroleum powered lawn equipment.
Environmental Quality Section 2: Water Resources Quality
The Planning Commission found Policy 3 to be unpractical and asked for it to be combined with
Policy 7.
7. The City shall investigate and use, to the extent practical, green street concepts tereenstrtiet
new streets, or retrofit existing streets and other measures that limit the community's
effective impervious area.
The Planning Commission asked that low impact development practices be included as a policy
statement. Policy 3 was edited to reflect this request.
The City shall encourage the use of low impact development practices that reduce
stormwater impacts from new and existing development.
The Planning Commission requested a policy be added that would encourage ODOT and
Washington County to improve the quality of stormwater runoff from their transportation facilities.
Policy 9 was added.
9. The City shall encourage the Oregon Department of Transportation and
Washington County to improve the quality of stormwater run-off from their
facilities.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 3 OF 22
• •
The Planning Commission advised that the wording of Recommended Action Measure 3 should be
changed to reflect the shift in Tree Board wording.
iii. Work with the Tree Board to develop an urban tree stew management and
preservation program that increases the canopy cover in Tigard.
The Planning Commission questioned the advantages of joining with CWS as a co-holder of the
NPDES permit. Following a review and comment by City staff (see Section VI and Exhibit B of
this staff report), Recommended Action Measure vi has been removed.
vi. Rcacarch putting the City of Tigard as a co holder with CWS on the NPDES permits.
Environmental Quality Section 3: Land Resources Quality
No changes were requested by the Planning Commission.
Energy Conservation
The Planning Commission is interested in engaging the community in a dialogue regarding what
efforts they would support to reduce energy consumption. This information could then be used to
develop incentives. Recommended Action Measure v was added.
v. Survey the community about energy consumption and identify top concerns that
could be addressed through conservation incentives.
The Planning Commission requested that the word implement be added to Recommended Action
Measure iv.
iv. Research and implement incentives and development codes that would encourage energy
efficiency in new developments.
Parks, Recreation,Trails, and Open Space
The Planning Commission thinks a public awareness program would be appropriate to outline
the benefits of parks and recreation. Recommended Action Measure xxvii was added.
xxvii. Develop an information program to raise the public's awareness of the importance
of recreational facilities and programs to .- • : • : .. -. . • . : • - -
public well-being and community livability.
Proposal Description
The primary intent of the proposed changes is to ensure the Comprehensive Plan remains a
viable tool for decision-makers. By updating the Comprehensive Plan, the City will ensure it is in
compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans, and programs. As importantly, the
update will also ensure the Comprehensive Plan reflects current community conditions and
values.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 4 OF 22
• •
This amendment is the first in a series of amendments that will update the Comprehensive Plan
in its entirety. This amendment will update Statewide Planning Goals 6, 8, and 13 with goals,
policies, and recommended action measures that will serve as the "legislative foundation" in
regards to parks, recreation, trails, open space, environmental quality, and energy conservation.
Land use actions and amendments to the Tigard Development Code will be based on the new
language included in this amendment.
Below is an explanation of the terms that create the "legislative foundation":
Goal
Definition - A general statement indicating a desired end or the direction the City will follow to
achieve that end.
Obligation -The City cannot take action which violates a goal statement unless:
1. Action is being taken which clearly supports another goal.
2. There are findings indicating the goal being supported takes precedence (in the particular case)
over another.
Policy
Definition - A statement identifying Tigard's position and a definitive course of action. Policies are
more specific than goals. They often identify the City's position in regard to implementing goals.
However, they are not the only actions the City can take to accomplish goals.
Obligation - The City must follow relevant policy statements when amending the Comprehensive
Plan, or developing other plans or ordinances which affect land use. To amend the Comprehensive
Plan, the City must show consistency with the Statewide Land Use Goals. Such an amendment
must take place following prescribed procedures prior to taking an action that would otherwise
violate a Plan policy.
Recommended Action Measures
Definition - A statement which outlines a specific City project or standard, which if executed,
would implement goals and policies. Recommended action measures also refer to specific projects,
standards, or courses of action the City desires other jurisdictions to take in regard to specific
issues. These statements also define the relationship the City desires to have with other jurisdictions
and agencies in implementing Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
Obligation - Completion of projects, adoption of standards, or the creation of certain relationships
or agreements with other jurisdictions and agencies, will depend on a number of factors such as
citizen priorities, finances, staff availability, etc.
The City should periodically review and prioritize recommended action measures based on current
circumstances, community needs and the City's goal and policy obligations. These statements are
suggestions to future City decision- makers as ways to implement the goals and policies. The listing
of recommended action measures in the plan does not obligate the City to accomplish them.
Neither do recommended action measures impose obligations on applicants who request
amendments or changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The list of recommended action measures is
not exclusive. It may be added to or amended as conditions warrant.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 5 OF 22
• •
SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF REPORT
Applicable criteria,findings and conclusions
• Tigard Community Development Code
o Chapter 18.380
o Chapter 18.390
•Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies
o Topics 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9
• Applicable Metro Standards
o Title 3 and 13
• Statewide Planning Goals
o Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13
City Department and outside agency comments
SECTION V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18)
Chapter 18.380: Zoning Map and Text Amendments
Chapter 18.380.020 Legislative Amendments to the Title and Map
A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be
undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.309.060G
Findings: The proposed amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan would establish policies
to be applied generally throughout the City of Tigard; and therefore, the application is being
processed as a Type IV procedure,Legislative Amendment, as governed by Section 18.390.060G.
Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures
Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures
B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative
matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale implementation of public policy.
Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions
made by the City Council.
Findings: The proposed amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan will be reviewed under
the Type IV procedure as detailed in Section 18.390.060.G. In accordance with this section, the
amendments will initially be considered by the Planning Commission with City Council making
the final decision.
Chapter 18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations. The recommendation by the
Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the
following factors:
1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised
Statutes Chapter 197;
2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable;
3. Any applicable Metro regulations;
4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and
5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances.
Findings: As indicated pursuant to the findings and conclusions that address applicable Statewide
Planning Goals and Regional Functional Plan Titles, the amendment is consistent with this
criterion.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 6 OF 22
• •
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the proposed amendments satisfy
the applicable review criteria within the Tigard Community Development Code and recommends
the Planning Commission forward these proposed amendments to the City Council with a
recommendation for adoption.
CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
A review of the comprehensive plan identified the following relevant policies for the proposed
amendments:
Topic 1: General Policies
Policy 1.1.1: The City shall ensure that:
a. This comprehensive plan and all future legislative changes are consistent with the
Statewide Planning Goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development
Commission, the Regional Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Service District;
Findings: As indicated pursuant to the findings and conclusions that address applicable Statewide
Planning Goals and Regional Functional Plan Titles, the amendment is consistent with this
criterion.
Topic 2: Citizen Involvement
Policy 2.1.1: The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall
assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the
planning process.
Findings: The proposal has complied with all notification requirements pursuant to Chapter
18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code. This staff report was also available
seven days in advance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.E.b of the Tigard Community
Development Code.
Additionally, a Public Involvement Program for the Comprehensive Plan Update was developed in
March 2006. This Program was reviewed and endorsed by the Committee for Citizen Involvement
and the Planning Commission. The Program outlined the information, outreach methods, and
involvement opportunities available to the citizens during the process.
Information was distributed throughout the process via the project website, an interested parties
listserv, Cityscape articles, press releases, articles in the local paper, and two project open houses.
Outreach methods also included presentations to a number of civic organizations in the
community, personal emails sent to groups and organizations, updates to City boards and
commissions, presentations to high school students, and staff attendance at community events to
pass out information.
Involvement opportunities included two open houses, participation on a policy interest team,
submitting written comments via the website, and attending the Planning Commission workshop.
Additionally, the interested parties listsery and volunteers who signed up for the policy interest
teams were provided notice of all meetings held regarding the Comprehensive Plan Update.
As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of this Planning
Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and published in the August 2,
2007 issue of The Times. Notice will be published again prior to the City Council public hearing.
The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 7 OF 22
• •
questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the entire draft of the
text changes could be viewed.
Policy 2.1.2: The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be
appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of
the community.
Findings: As outlined above, the community was given multiple venues to get information and get
involved. This included a number of articles in the Cityscape newsletter that is delivered to every
household in Tigard. Staff also made a good faith effort to ensure a diversity of citizens and
stakeholders were involved in the policy interest team meetings by not only soliciting volunteers,
but by inviting organizations that share a common interest in that particular topic.
Policy 2.1.3: The City shall ensure that information on land use planning issues is
available in an understandable form for all interested citizens.
Findings: Information regarding the topics included in this Comprehensive Plan Amendment was
available in multiple locations in an understandable format for the duration of the process. This
included paper and electronic copies that were available in the permit center and also on the
website. Information was regularly sent to the project listsery and to the community volunteers
who participated on the policy interest teams.
Topic 3: Natural Features and Open Space
Policy 3.2.5 The City shall require the consideration of dedication of all undeveloped land
within the 100-year floodplain plus sufficient open land for greenway purposes specifically
identified for recreation within the plan.
Findings: This policy is satisfied by the proposed amendment through Goal 8.1 and specifically
Policies 6, 17, and 24. These policies outline the City's approach to acquiring open space, which
may include greenway property within the 100-year floodplain. Policy 24 provides guidance for
the considerations to follow when accepting such a dedication.
Policy 3.5.1 The City shall encourage private enterprise and intergovernmental
agreements which will provide for open space, recreation lands, facilities, and preserve
natural, scenic and historic areas in a manner consistent with the availability of resources.
Policy 3.5.2 The City shall coordinate with the school districts to develop recreational
facilities.
Policy 3.5.3 The City has designated the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek, its
tributaries, and the Tualatin River as greenway, which will be the backbone of the open
space system. Where landfill and/or development are allowed within or adjacent to the
100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient
open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain.
Policy 3.5.4 The City shall provide an interconnected pedestrian/bikepath throughout the
City.
Policy 3.6.1 Individual park sites, as defined by the parks and open space standards and
classification system shall be developed according to the following priorities:
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 8 OF 22
• •
a. Facilities within a park will be adjusted to meet the needs and desires of the park
system development charge (SDC) district residents and the characteristics of the
site. Park and/or recreational facilities in greatest demand and least supply should
receive the highest development priorities
b. Parks should be planned to ensure maximum benefit to the greatest number of
local residents. For this reason, acquisition and development of community level
parks should be given the highest priority.
c. Development of additional neighborhood parks will have a lower priority for
public funding and are encouraged to be provided by the private sector within
planned unit developments and maintained by homeowners associations.
d. New mini parks have the lowest development priority and should be supplied at
the developer's or neighborhood's expense and maintained by a neighborhood
association created as part of the development process.
e. Provision of regional park facilities will only be considered as an interjurisdictional
project, and should have a low priority unless unusual circumstances arise.
f. Acceptance of any land dedicated for park purposes shall be based upon its
usefulness and adaptability to the adopted park and open space system.
3.6.2 The City shall coordinate with other public, private organizations and affected
private property owners in order to facilitate the implementation of the City's adopted
park plans.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4, 3.6.1, and 3.6.2 will be
deleted and replaced in their entirety by proposed amendment Goals 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3 and their
associated policies (see Exhibit A). This update will ensure the City is in compliance with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans, and programs. This update will also ensure continued
compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 8 as the new goals and policies reflect current
community conditions and values. The new goals and policies have been developed through,a
citizen involvement effort, reviewed by City staff, reviewed by affected agencies, reviewed by the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and reviewed by the Planning Commission at a July 16,
2007 workshop.
Topic 4: Air,Water, and Land Resources Quality
4.1.1 The City shall:
a. Maintain and improve the quality of Tigard's air quality and coordinate with other
jurisdictions and agencies to reduce air pollutions within the Portland-Vancouver
Air Quality Maintenance Area (AQMA).
b. Where applicable, require a statement from the appropriate agency that all
applicable standards can be met,prior to the approval of a new land use proposal.
c. Apply the measures described in the DEQ handbook for "Environmental Quality
Elements of Oregon Local Comprehensive Land Use Plans" to land use decisions
having the potential to affect air quality.
4.2.1 All development within the Tigard Urban Planning area shall comply with
applicable federal, state, and regional water quality standards, including those contained
in the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Manual. (Rev. Ord. 02-15)
4.2.2 The City shall recognize and assume its responsibility for operating,planning, and
regulating wastewater systems as designated in Metro's waste treatment management
component. (Rev. Ord. 02-15)
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 9 OF 22
• •
4.3.1 The City shall:
a. Require development proposals located in a noise congested area or a use which
creates noise in excess of the applicable standards to incorporate the following
into the site plan:
1. Building placement on the site in an area where the noise levels will have a
minimal impact; or
2. Landscaping and other techniques to lessen noise impacts to levels compatible
with the surrounding land uses.
e. Coordinate with DEQ in its Noise Regulation Program and apply the DEQ Land
Use Compatibility Program.
f. Where applicable require a statement from the appropriate agency (prior to the
approval of a land use proposal) that all applicable standards can be met.
4.4.1 The City shall maintain and improve, if possible, the current quality of Tigard's land
resources.
4.4.2 The City shall recognize MSD's responsibility and authority to prepare and
implement a Solid Waste Management Plan.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.3.1, 4.4.1, and 4.4.2 will be
deleted and replaced in their entirety by proposed amendment Goals 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 and their
associated Policies (see Exhibit A). This update will ensure the City is in compliance with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans, and programs. This update will also ensure continued
compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 6 as the new goals and policies reflect current
community conditions and values. The new goals and policies have been developed through a
citizen involvement effort, reviewed by City staff, reviewed by affected agencies, and reviewed by
the Planning Commission at a July 16, 2007 workshop.
Topic 8: Transportation
8.1.1 Plan, design, and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the
livability of Tigard by:
b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure, and desirable
pedestrian routes.
Findings: Trails provide a dual purpose for the community. They act as a form of recreation, but
are also important components of the City's transportation system. The inclusion of proposed
amendment Goal 6.2 and its associated Policy 1 (see Exhibit A) displays the City's commitment to
providing both recreational opportunities and a balanced transportation system. Thus, this policy is
satisfied.
8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of
transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and other
modes) by:
e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails.
Findings: The proposed amendment Goal 6.2 and its associated Policy 1 (see Exhibit A) aim to
ensure pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available and connected in the community. The
inclusion of this language satisfies this policy by incorporating trails, for not only recreational
purposes,but as a recognized mode of transportation.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 10 OF 22
• •
8.1.5 Develop transportation facilities which are accessible to all members of the
community and minimize out of direction travel by:
a. The design and construction of transportation facilities to meet the requirements
of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Findings: This policy is satisfied by proposed amendment Policy 23 under Goal 6.1 (see Exhibit A).
The language reads "The City shall continue to improve access to neighborhood parks and other
facilities according to the City's Americans with Disabilities Act plan". This language encompasses
bicycle and pedestrian trails that are provided for the community's use.
8.5.1 The City shall locate bicycle/pedestrian corridors in a manner which provides for
pedestrian and bicycle users safe and convenient movement in all parts of the City by
developing the pathway system shown on the adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan.
Findings: The proposed amendment Goal 6.2 and its associated Policy 1 (see Exhibit A) aim to
ensure pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available and connected in the community. The
inclusion of this language satisfies this policy by incorporating trails, for not only recreational
purposes, but as a recognized mode of transportation that is safe, convenient, and connecting
important locations throughout the City.
Topic 9: Energy
9.1.1 The City shall encourage a reduction in energy consumption by increased
opportunities for energy conservation and the production of energy from alternative
sources.
9.1.2 The City shall establish a balanced and efficient transportation system which
complements the land use plan and is designed to minimize energy impacts.
9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy
conservation, design, and construction.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3 will be deleted and replaced
in their entirety by proposed amendment Goal 13.1 and its associated Policies (see Exhibit A).
This update will ensure the City is in compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans,
and programs. This update will also ensure continued compliance with Statewide Planning Goal
13 as the new goals and policies reflect current community conditions and values. The new goals
and policies have been developed through a citizen involvement effort, reviewed by City staff,
reviewed by affected agencies, and reviewed by the Planning Commission at a July 16, 2007
workshop.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the proposed amendment satisfies
the applicable policies contained in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
APPLICABLE METRO REGULATIONS:
Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 3: Water Quality, Flood
Management, and Fish/Wildlife Habitat Conservation - protect beneficial uses and
functional values of water quality and flood management resources by limiting uses in
these areas from development activities and protecting life and property from dangers
associated with flooding.
Findings: In 2002, the City of Tigard adopted Comprehensive Plan and Code Amendments to
comply with Title 3 of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, which outlines water
quality and flood management requirements for the region. The adopted standards were based on a
unified program developed by local governments in the Tualatin Basin and implemented through
the Clean Water Services District's (CWS) Design & Construction Standards, which provides for
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 11 OF 22
• •
vegetated stream corridor buffers up to 200 feet wide and mandating restoration of corridors in
marginal or degraded condition.
In addition, Clean Water Services, local cities, Washington County, Metro, and Tualatin Hills Park
and Recreation District, partnered on a parallel effort to develop the CWS Healthy Streams Plan
(HSP), an updated watershed plan designed to enhance the functions of the Tualatin Basin surface
water system and address the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The proposed amendment, specifically Goal 6.2 and its associated policies (see Exhibit A), will
continue to ensure compliance with Title 3 requirements and standards. Policies 1 and 2 provide
clear direction that water quality is an important component of the community and the City will
continue in partnership with other jurisdictions in the Tualatin Basin to ensure water quality
standards are being met and programs being implemented. The remaining policies outline
additional strategies the City will employ to improve the community's water quality and limit
pollution from stormwater run-off.
Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 13: Nature in Neighborhoods —
conserve, protect, and restore a continuous ecologically viable streamside corridor system,
from the streams' headwaters to their confluence with other streams and rivers, and with
their flooplains in a manner that is integrated with upland wildlife habitat and with the
surrounding urban landscape; and control and prevent water pollution for the protection of
the public health and safety, and to maintain and improve water quality throughout the
region.
Findings: The multi-jurisdictional approach undertaken by Tualatin Basin jurisdictions was used to
develop a program to meet Statewide Goal 5 requirements for inventorying riparian areas and
wildlife habitat and to comply with Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 13
(the regional Nature in Neighborhoods program). The Tualatin Basin Fish and Wildlife Habitat Program
was developed to complement Clean Water Services Design and Constructions Standards to
protect the beneficial uses of water (including rivers, streams and creeks) within the Tualatin Basin.
The proposed amendment, specifically Goal 6.2 and its associated policies (see Exhibit A), will
continue to ensure compliance with Tide 13 requirements and standards. Policies 1 and 2 provide
clear direction that water quality is an important component of the community and the City will
continue in partnership with other jurisdictions in the Tualatin Basin to ensure water quality
standards are being met and programs being implemented. The remaining policies outline
additional strategies the City will employ to improve the community's water quality and limit
pollution from stormwater run-off.
The proposed amendment, specifically Goal 8.1 and its associated policies (see Exhibit A),
identifies parks, open space, and natural areas as having wildlife habitat value. Policy 6 directs the
City to acquire and manage open space specifically for protection of natural resources. Policy 19
directs the City to maintain and manage parks and open space in ways that preserve, protect, and
restore natural resources,including rare or state and federally listed species.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the proposed amendment satisfies
the applicable Metro regulations.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 12 OF 22
• •
THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER
OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197
Statewide Planning Goal 1 — Citizen Involvement:
This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive
Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents.
Findings: This goal was met through an extensive public involvement process. A Public
Involvement Program for the Comprehensive Plan Update was developed in March 2006. This
Program was reviewed and endorsed by the Committee for Citizen Involvement and the Planning
Commission. The Program outlined the information, outreach methods, and involvement
opportunities available to the citizens during the process.
Information was distributed throughout the process via the project website, an interested parties
listserv, Cityscape articles, press releases, articles in the local paper, and two project open houses.
Outreach methods also included presentations to a number of civic organizations in the
community, personal emails sent to groups and organizations, updates to City boards and
commissions, presentations to high school students, and staff attendance at community events to
pass out information.
Involvement opportunities included two open houses, participation on a policy interest team,
submitting written comments via the website, and attending the Planning Commission workshop.
Additionally, the interested parties listsery and volunteers who signed up for the policy interest
teams were provided notice of all meetings held regarding the Comprehensive Plan Update.
As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of this Planning
Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and published in the August 2,
2007 issue of The Times (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). Notice
will be published again prior to the City Council public hearing. The notice invited public input and
included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the
address of the City's webpage where the entire draft of the text changes could be viewed.
Statewide Planning Goal 2 —Land Use Planning:
This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The
Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide
planning goals.
Findings: The proposed amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is being processed as a
Type IV procedure, which requires any applicable statewide planning goals, federal or state
statutes or regulations, Metro regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and City's implementing
ordinances, be addressed as part of the decision-making process. Notice was provided to DLCD
45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. All applicable review criteria have
been addressed within this staff report; therefore, the requirements of Goal 2 have been met.
Statewide Planning Goal S— Natural Resources
This goal requires the inventory and protection of natural resources, open spaces, historic
areas and sites.
Findings: The proposed amendment is consistent with this goal as the proposed changes direct the
City to protect open spaces and natural resources, as well as protect water quality and function that
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 13 OF 22
• •
can lead to improved habitat conditions. This policy direction is an enhancement to Goal 5
protections already in place in the community.
Proposed Goal 8.1 and its associated policies (see Exhibit A), identifies parks, open space, and
natural areas as having wildlife habitat value. Policy 6 directs the City to acquire and manage open
space specifically for protection of natural resources. Policy 19 directs the City to maintain and
manage parks and open space in ways that preserve, protect, and restore natural resources,
including rare or state and federally listed species.
Proposed Goal 6.2 and its associated policies (see Exhibit A), provide clear direction that water
quality is an important component of the community and the City will continue in partnership with
other jurisdictions in the Tualatin Basin to ensure water quality standards are being met and
programs being implemented. These policies also aim to minimize erosion, limit stormwater run-
off impacts, educate the public about personal actions that cause water quality problems, and
restore the natural function of riparian systems. All of these policies have the ability to improved
water quality in the community and thus improve riparian and aquatic habitats.
Statewide Planning Goal 6:Air, Water, and Land Resources Quality
To maintain and improve the quality of the air,water, and land resources of the state.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies relating to Statewide Planning Goal 6 will be
deleted and replaced in their entirety by proposed amendment Goals 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 and their
associated Policies (see Exhibit A). This update will ensure the City is in compliance with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans, and programs. This update will also ensure continued
compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 6 as the new goals and policies reflect current
community conditions and values. The new goals and policies have been developed through a
citizen involvement effort, reviewed by City staff, reviewed by affected agencies, and reviewed by
the Planning Commission at a July 16, 2007 workshop.
The Department of Land Conservation and Development, who oversees the Statewide Planning
Program, was given the opportunity to comment and commended the City for undertaking such
a thorough review of its Plan. The comments,in their entirety, can be found in Exhibit B.
Statewide Planning Goal 8:Recreational Needs
This goal aims to provide for the siting of facilities for the recreational needs of the
citizens of the state and visitors.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies relating to Statewide Planning Goal 8 will be
deleted and replaced in their entirety by proposed amendment Goals 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3 and their
associated policies (see Exhibit A). This update will ensure the City is in compliance with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, plans, and programs. This update will also ensure continued
compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 8 as the new goals and policies reflect current
community conditions and values. The new goals and policies have been developed through a
citizen involvement effort, reviewed by City staff, reviewed by affected agencies, reviewed by the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and reviewed by the Planning Commission at a July 16,
2007 workshop.
The Department of Land Conservation and Development, who oversees the Statewide Planning
Program, was given the opportunity to comment and commended the City for undertaking such
a thorough review of its Plan.The comments,in their entirety, can be found in Exhibit B.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 14 OF 22
• •
Statewide Planning Goal 9:Economic Development
To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic
activities vital to the health,welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens.
Findings: The proposed amendment is consistent with this goal as it provides policy direction
that intends to create a high-quality, livable community. High quality, livable communities
contribute to economic vitality by attracting employers and employees who understand the
importance of clean air, clean water, clean land resources, parks, recreation, trails, open spaces,
and the need to conserve energy for future generations.
Statewide Planning Goal 11:Public Facilities and Services
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development.
Findings: The proposed amendment is consistent with this goal as it provides policy direction
that intends to ensure the efficient arrangement of public facilities and services. Updated policies
address the provision of parks and recreation facilities, City infrastructure that improves air and
water quality, and community government buildings that conserve energy.
Statewide Planning Goal 12: Transportation
The goal aims to provide "a safe, convenient and economic transportation system."
Findings: The proposed Amendment is consistent with this goal as it provides policy direction
that intends to diversify the City's transportation system by creating a trail system that serves the
dual purpose of recreation and transportation. Policies relating to Goals 6.1 and 13.1 also
promote the use of alternative forms of transportation (biking,walking, public transit) to improve
air quality and conserve energy.
Statewide Planning Goal 13:Energy Conservation
Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize
the conservation of all forms of energy, based on sound economic principles.
Findings: Current Comprehensive Plan Policies relating to Statewide Planning Goal 13 will be
deleted and replaced in their entirety by proposed amendment Goal 13.1 and its associated
policies (see Exhibit A). This update will ensure the City is in compliance with applicable laws,
rules, regulations, plans, and programs. This update will also ensure continued compliance with
Statewide Planning Goal 13 as the new goals and policies reflect current community conditions
and values. The new goals and policies have been developed through a citizen involvement effort,
reviewed by City staff, reviewed by affected agencies, and reviewed by the Planning Commission
at a July 16, 2007 workshop.
The Department of Land Conservation and Development, who oversees the Statewide Planning
Program, was given the opportunity to comment and commended the City for undertaking such
a thorough review of its Plan. The comments,in their entirety, can be found in Exhibit C.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the proposed amendment is
consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 15 OF 22
• .
SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard's Building Division, Engineering Division, Current Planning Division,
and Police Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond.
The City of Tigard's Public Works had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered the
following comments.
Under Water Resources Quality, Recommended Action Measure iv: we do inventory
outfalls as part of implementing the Healthy Streams Plan so that may be a repeat and
could be assumed if we are implementing Healthy Streams Plan. We have goals for
outfall retrofitting and are implementing projects to do just that each and every year.
Findings: Staff agrees with the comments and has added language "Continue to" to clarify this is
an action that is already being implemented. Staff recommends leaving the action measure with
the updated language.
Under Water Resources Quality, Recommended Action Measure vi: I don't think it is a
good idea to be a co-holder of the NPDES permit. Really all the cities in the basin are co-
holders of the NPDES permit. The permit needs to be held by a single entity so there is a
single point of compliance. I don't think it is a good idea to have Tigard singled out.
CWS holds the permit because that was needed basin wide to clean up the Tualatin and
its tributaries and there has been tremendous progress made. Also, we are at the very
bottom of the basin and don't have control over what goes on upstream of us. Being a co-
holder of the permit just doesn't make sense and makes us responsible for things outside
of our jurisdiction and control.
Findings: Staff agrees with the rational argument made for removing the Recommended Action
Measure and has removed it from the language. All jurisdictions in the Tualatin basin collaborate
with Clean Water Services in the management of the water resources within the basin and all
have agreed to the NPDES permit structure that is currently in place. If and when conditions
change and it is important for the cities to have their name on the permit, Tigard will collaborate
once again. Staff recommends leaving Recommended Action Measure vi deleted from the
proposal language.
Consider adding an action measure to develop a program to collect and dispose of
medicine to keep it out of our streams. Educate the public not to flush medicines.
Findings: As this has become an important issue in urban streams around the region, Staff added
Recommended Action Measure xiii and recommends leaving the language in the proposal.
xiii.Educate the public about effects of flushing pharmaceuticals and develop a program to
collect and properly dispose of them so they do not reach and contaminate our streams.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the comments and subsequent
edits to the proposed amendment are in the best interest of the City and recommends inclusion
of the changes in the language of this proposal.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 16 OF 22
• •
SECTION VII. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS
The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not
respond:
Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District
Tualatin Valley Water District
Clean Water Services
City of Durham
City of Beaverton
City of King City
City of Lake Oswego
City of Portland
City of Tualatin
Clackamas County Planning Department
Washington County, Department of Land Use and Transportation
Metro Land Use and Planning
Oregon Department of Energy
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1, District 2A
Oregon Division of State Lands
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
TriMet Transit Development
The Beaverton School District had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no
objections.
The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (see Exhibit C) had an
opportunity to review this proposal and offered the following comments:
To the extent trails provide a transportation role as well as a recreation role, DLCD
suggests that trails be incorporated into the upcoming plan update related to
transportation. When the action of providing a trail addresses two public purposes —
namely recreation and transportation— the City should highlight it and emphasize the dual
benefit.
Findings: The Transportation Chapter (Statewide Planning Goal 12) of the Tigard Comprehensive
Plan update will incorporate trails as an important component of a multi-modal transportation
system in the community.
The City may want to reconsider the wording on action item 4.1.e under Air Quality. The
actions taken to "reduce congestion" may or may not improve air quality. If "reduce
congestion" is implemented through adding lanes to increase road capacity, more vehicles
are on the road, and thus negatively affecting air quality. If "reduce congestion" is
implemented by reducing vehicle miles traveled, then there is a positive impact on air
quality. DLCD suggests the City clarify the intent of this action item.
Findings: Recommended Action Measure v, under Goal 6.1, has been edited to include specific
language clarifying the intent as stated by DLCD.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 17 OF 22
• •
v. Pursue funding for . : --:: : :.- - . ; - - intersection improvements, access
management controls, and intelligent transportation systems that would help to
reduce congestion.
•
The City may want to have a further consideration on the Water Quality section. There is
no mention of the regional program—Nature in Neighborhoods —even though it addresses
both riparian corridor protection and water quality. The City may want to consider
broadening its Comprehensive Plan language to recognize this regional program.
Findings: Policies 1 and 2, under Goal 6.2, commit the City to implementing Titles 3 and 13 of the
Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. Language has also been added to the
introduction for the Water Quality section that incorporates DLCD comments.
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (see Exhibit D) had an opportunity to review this
proposal and offered the following comments:
Add the following items to the list of Recommended Action Measures under Air Resources
Quality:
"Work with the Tree Board to develop an urban tree management and protection program
that increases the canopy cover in Tigard."
Findings: Recommended Action Measure iii, under Goal 6.2, contains this exact language and staff
recommends it redundant to include it twice. A Policy Interest Team has also been meeting with
the Tigard Tree Board to develop goals, policies, and recommended action measures specific to
trees.
"Perform a survey of tree canopy cover to evaluate existing canopy cover conditions and
identify needs and opportunities for increasing tree canopy cover."
Findings: A Policy Interest Team has been meeting with the Tigard Tree Board to develop goals,
policies, and recommended action measures specific to trees. Staff recommends allowing these
issues to be addressed through that process.
Revise Policy 4 for Water Resources Quality to remove the language "to the extent
practical".
Findings: The language was developed through the work of the Policy Interest Team and their
intent was to provide some flexibility for the City because of funding issues and physical geography
that could be barriers to restoration. Staff recommends leaving the language in order to avoid
possible legalities over whether the City's policy is to protect, restore, and enhance all natural
functions.
Revise Policy 6 for Water Resources Quality to include commercial and industrial
operators.
Findings: Staff recommends incorporating the language into the policy to read:
6. The City shall continue to collaborate on educating the public of techniques and practices
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 18 OF 22
• •
private individuals, businesses, and industrial operators can employ to help correct
water quality issues.
Revise Policy 7 for Water Resources Quality to include eco roofs.
Findings: Policy 7 has been revised based on Planning Commission comments at the July 16th
workshop to read "and other measures". Staff recommends leaving the language as is because it is
adequate to encompass eco roofs.
Add specific language to Water Resources Quality policies that states the City shall
protect/maintain riparian buffers to at least 50 feet for non fish bearing streams and at least
100 feet for fish bearing streams. Buffer distances are to be measured on either side of
stream centerline.
Findings: City regulations currently protect the vegetated corridor as defined by the Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards. These standards are applied basin-wide and provide a
stream buffer ranging from 25 to 200 feet, depending on the geography of the particular stream.
Staff recommends no changes as the measures in place have been adopted to comply with state,
federal, and regional regulations and programs.
Add specific language to Water Resources Quality policies that states the City shall support
consideration of water quality when considering placement and design of recreational
trails. Placement of trails should be avoided in areas prone to erosion to protect water
quality.
Findings: The Sensitive Lands Chapter 18.775 of the Community Development Code regulates
development in sensitive areas. Staff recommends no policy be added as this issue is addressed
through development review.
Add specific language to Water Resources Quality policies that states the City shall
promote and incorporate the use of pervious trail surfaces to protect water quality.
Findings: Policy 2, under Goal 8.2, addresses the design of trails to minimize their impact on the
environment. Staff recommends no additional policies be added to Water Resources Quality.
Revise Recommended Action Measure v for Water Resources Quality to address
restoration of wetland/riparian area function to increase filtration of contaminants and
sediment with the intent of improving water quality.
Findings: Policy 4, under Goal 6.2, addresses the restoration of wetland/riparian area for their
positive contribution to water quality. Staff recommends not adding additional language at this
time.
Add specific language to Land Resources Quality policies that states the City shall provide
incentives to households and commercial operators for recycling to reduce the amount of
solid waste.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 19 OF 22
• •
Findings: The City participates in a regional program for waste reduction. Staff recommends not
adding specific policies to provide incentives, because of budgetary implications, but a
recommended action measure to research a program such as this may be appropriate.
Add the following key findings to the Goal 8: Parks:
"Open spaces and natural areas can provide important wildlife habitat and wildlife
movement corridors within urban areas."
"Open spaces and natural areas are often where humans interface with wildlife. There are
both potential benefits as well as potential risks with this. Appropriate Living with Wildlife
practices can maximize public enjoyment of wildlife while minimizing potential conflicts."
Findings: Staff agrees with the proposed findings, but recommends not including them within the
Parks section. Statewide Planning Goal 5 deals with wildlife habitat and these issues will be
addressed at that time.
Add specific language to the Parks policies that states the City shall post signs in open
spaces and natural areas to restrict dogs from entering designated areas.
Findings: Staff recommends not including this as a policy, as it is more appropriate to address at a
programmatic level.
Add specific language to the Parks policies that states the City shall post signs in open
spaces and natural areas to restrict dogs from entering designated areas.
Findings: Staff recommends not including this as a policy, as it is more appropriate to address at a
programmatic level.
Add specific language to the Parks policies that states the City shall post signs in open
spaces and natural areas that communicate that harassment and feeding of wildlife is
prohibited.
Findings: Staff recommends not including this as a policy, as it is more appropriate to address at a
programmatic level.
Add specific language to the Parks policies that states the City shall place trails outside
open spaces and natural areas in areas where sensitive wildlife species are located.
Findings: Policy 2, under Goal 8.2, addresses the design of trails to minimize their impact on the
environment. Staff recommends no additional policies be added to Water Resources Quality.
Revise Recommended Action Measure xxv for Parks to read:
"Incorporate natural resources studies and monitoring in the City's management of public
open spaces and related natural areas."
Findings: The language 'When feasible and appropriate" was removed based on Policy Interest
Team meetings and review by the Department Review Team. This comment has been
accommodated. Staff recommends the updated version of the Recommended Action Measure.
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 20 OF 22
•
Add specific language to the Energy Conservation policies that provides incentives for new
development to incorporate green building practices (solar panels, use of recycled
materials, etc.).
Findings: Recommended Action Measure iv directs the City to research and implement incentives.
Staff recommends not adding specific policies to provide incentives, because of budgetary
implications.
Consider adding to the Energy Conservation chapter incentives and/or cost reduction for
the use of public transportation.
Findings: Staff recommends not adding specific policies to provide incentives, because of
budgetary implications, but a recommended action measure to research a program such as this may
be appropriate.
Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (see Exhibit E) had an opportunity to review this proposal and
offered the following comments:
Include language encouraging the installation of automatic sprinkler systems in all
buildings wherever and whenever possible. The benefits with regard to the Planning Goals
are:
• Less water use for fighting hostile fires within buildings or structures. Automatic
sprinkler systems use a fraction of the water necessary to control or extinguish a fire
within a building or structure.
• Less contaminated runoff from firefighting operations polluting surrounding
streams and wetlands.
Findings: The City of Tigard currently complies with Oregon Fire Code that utilizes the NFPA 13:
Standard for the Installation of Sprinklers (from the National Fire Protection Association) for the
adopted code standards relating to the installation of sprinkler systems. If and when the standards
change, the City will adopt and enforce those standards. Staff recommends not adding this
language, as the City is currently enforcing standards developed at the national level.
CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the comments and subsequent
edits to the proposed amendment are in the best interest of the City and recommends inclusion
of the changes in the language of this proposal.
SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION
The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Metro regulations,
the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances.
Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Tigard City Council as determined through the public
hearing process.
STAFF REPORT TO TI IE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 21 OF 22
•
ATTACHMENT:
EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
EXHIBIT B: PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
EXHIBIT C: DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
COMMENTS
EXHIBIT D: OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMENTS
EXHIBIT E: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE COMMENTS
EXHIBIT F: DEFINITIONS
'a^ 5 August 13, 2007
P PARED BY: Darren Wyss DATE
Associate Planner
etArra r
August 13, 2007
PPROVED BY: Ron Bunc DATE
Planning Manager
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA 2007-00001 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 6,8,AND 13 PAGE 22 OF 22
• •
Planning Commission Hearing, 8/20/07
Typo Correction
Policy 8.1.2 The City shall acquire and, where appropriate, improve natural areas
located within a half mile of every Tigard resident to provide passive recreational
opportunities.
Revisions Recommended by Sue Bielke
Action Measure 8.1.xxxii: Include natural resource series surveys and monitoring in
the City's management of public open spaces and related natural resources.
Policy 8.2.2: The City shall design and build greenway trails and paths to minimize
their impact on the environment, including and rare and state and federally listed
species
Revisions Recommend by Public Works
Reinstate the following stricken phases:
Action Measure 8.1.xxxii: When feasible and appropriate, Include natural resources
studics surveys and monitoring in the City's management of public open spaces and
related natural resources.
Action Measure 8.1.xxxiii: Remove and control non-native plants, including noxious
weeds, in natural areas, where feasible and appropriate.
Action Measure 8.2.vii: ces arc available, Use automated systems to
systematically map and document trail easements, right-of-way dedications, proposed
alignments, and current trail locations.
i/Irpin/duane/corm plan.park.dlcdc.staff changes
I Duane Roberts- Re: Policy Adoption Proc • Page 1
From: "sbeilke" <sbeilke @europa.com>
To: "Duane Roberts" <DUANE @tigard-or.gov>, <heather @coachheather.com>,
<darpy @comcast.net>, <dnknesbitt@comcast.net>, <palmerli @comcast.net>,
<rochellegis @comcast.net>, <SGRollins @comcast.net>, <blueberry165 @gmail.com>,
<CFRJLR @gmail.com>, <tony.p.doan @gmail.com>, <carlswitzer @hotmail.com>,
<huskyordie1 @hotmail.com>, <peter @jpstack.com>, <metroparks @metro.dst.or.us>,
<admin @southsidesoccer.org>, <jfrewing @teleport.com>, <greg.bui @tigardll.org>,
<jasminad @tmail.com>, <Doug @Vorwaller.com>, <finelytreaded @yahoo.com>,
<melissasweet08 @ yahoo.com>, <pflotus @yahoo.com>
Date: 8/17/2007 11:20:07 AM
Subject: Re: Policy Adoption Process
Duane,
I reviewed the attachments and have a few comments.
- Under Goals and Policies: #11, OK with changing the wording using the
blue highlighted verbage. #13, originally the wording we added was
"including rare, state and federally listed species. Somewhere along the
line"rare"was taken out but we never discussed this at any subsequent
meetings. "Rare" includes species such as camas, white oaks, Willamette
Valley Ponderosa Pine, Willamette Valley Daisy, etc. All species that have
disappeared for the most part in most of the valley and are considered
"rare" by the Nature Conservancy and other groups. I and my volunteers have
conducted surveys throughout Tigard and also consider these species rare and
thus deserving of extra attention and protection which benefits the resource
as well as humans who can enjoy their beauty and other many benefits these
species contribute. I have worked as a wildlife biologist in Oregon for 20
years now and they are"rare"and becoming more so each day as we loose open
space. Nationally, we lose 6,000 acres of open space EVERY DAY! So, I
would request at this time the word "rare" be reinstated. It will only make
our parks and open spaces more special and unique for all to enjoy.
I still would like to see 2b as a separate goal, since I still feel open
spaces and natural resources are getting the short end of the stick in this
section, but, that can be remedied under the natural resources section. If
not, we will need to come back and rework the open spaces sections under
this part of the Comp. Plan.
- Under Action Measures, I am OK with your changed wording on#39 (what was
#34), as highlighted in blue except for the word "studies", as we had had
the word "surveys"there previously which is more appropriate in this case.
Also OK with the changes under Maintenance and Operations.
Thank you Duane for all the time and effort you put into this. Also thanks
to all on our committe and all of the effort folks made to make the meetings
and their input.
Sue Beilke
Director, The Biodiversity Project of Tigard
—Original Message—
From: "Duane Roberts" <DUANE @ tigard-or.gov>
L Duane Roberts- Re: Policy Adoption Pro* • Page 2
To: <heather @coachheather.com>; <darpy @comcast.net>;
<dnknesbitt@comcast.net>; <palmerli @comcast.net>; <rochellegis @comcast.net>;
<SGRollins @comcast.net>; <sbeilke @europa.com>; <blueberry165 @gmail.com>;
<CFRJLR @gmail.com>; <tony.p.doan @gmail.com>; <carlswitzer @hotmail.com>;
<huskyordiel @hotmail.com>; <peter @jpstack.com>;
<metroparks @metro.dst.or.us>; <admin @southsidesoccer.org>;
<jfrewing @teleport.com>; <greg.bui @tigardll.org>; <jasminad @tmail.com>;
<Doug @Vorwaller.com>; <finelytreaded @yahoo.com>; <melissasweet08 @ yahoo.com>;
<pflotus @yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 5:12 PM
Subject: Policy Adoption Process
> Parks and Open Spaces Citizen Interest Team:
>Attached in two different formats are the final parks goals, policies,
> and action measures. The content is the same, with the exceptions noted
> below. One version is the format we used to develop the goals and
> policies. This is the same version I revised and email after our last
> CIT meeting. Those who responded agreed with the proposed editorial
>changes.
>The other version is in the format used for the hearing and adoption
> process. As you will see, the difference in content between the two
>are strikeouts related to recreation program financial measures. The
>city manager directed me to delete references to these measures. In some
>cases, substitue language is proposed. The Staff Commentary in bold
> intermingled with the crossed out material gives the reasons for the
> changes.
> Please let me know if you have any questions or note any discrepencies.
>The Planning Commission hearing is on Monday, Aug. 20, starting at 7:00
> PM. PC will be making a recommendation to Counil on the proposed
> policies. The hearing will include testimony from the public.
>A Council workshop on the proposed policies is set for Tuesday, Sept
>25th. The CC hearing date has not been set, as yet.
> Duane Roberts
> City of Tigard
> 13125 SW Hall Blvd.
>Tigard, OR 97223
>duane@tigard-or.gov
> 503-718-2444
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
Concepts: Management and Preservation of Trees and Other Vegetation
Background Statement and
Goals, Policies, and Action Measures
Discussion Draft
Including Edits Approved by Tree Board August 15, 2007
BACKGROUND
Statewide Planning Goal 2: Community Design - Trees and Other Vegetation
Overview:Vegetation and its Importance
Trees and other types of vegetation are integral to the quality of Tigard's urban and natural
environments. Vegetation is valuable for its aesthetic qualities and contribution to air and
water quality, stormwater retention, soil stability, and wildlife habitat. When appropriately
used, trees can moderate temperatures by providing shade and windbreaks. Native and
ornamental vegetation is also essential to the quality of the city's public realm including
streets, parks and open spaces by providing a comfortable and aesthetic setting that provides
habitat, increases property values, enhances community attractiveness and investment, and
promotes human health and well-being. Trees and vegetation provide variation in color,
texture,line and form that softens the hard geometry of the built environment.
Much of the native vegetation in Tigard's City Limits and Urban Services Area (TUSA) has
been displaced, first by agriculture and logging in the 19.h. century, and more recently by
increasingly dense urban development. Competition from introduced invasive species such
as English ivy, reed canary grass, and Himalayan blackberries has made it difficult for
remaining native plant communities to thrive. However, many areas of environmentally
significant vegetation still remain within the City Limits and TUSA. These natural resource
sites include vegetation on steep slopes, within stream corridors, and along the Tualatin
River,Fanno Creek and their tributaries, flood plains and wetlands.
Tigard has many mature and outstanding native and non-native trees planted when the area
was rural country-side in the latter half of the 19.'s.and early 20.`''.centuries. Additional trees
were planted during the period of large lot residential subdivision development from the late
1940's through the 1970's, many of which survive to this day. The presence of mature trees
lends to Tigard's sense of place and identity, increases the value of residential properties
containing mature trees, and contributes to the overall economic prosperity of the
community.
Tree groves within Tigard's City Limits and Urban Services Area include coniferous and
mixed deciduous/coniferous stands of trees. The area's remaining forested areas and tree
groves are located mostly on steep hillsides, in or near wetlands, and along the Tualatin
1
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
River, Fanno Creek and other streams, and floodplains. Tree groves are valuable for wildlife
habitat, recreation, and aesthetic resources. Forested areas also contribute to air quality,
provide wildlife habitat, shade,and stabilize steep slopes.
The Tigard area has both emergent wetlands, where grasses are the dominant plant
community, and forested wetlands, which are dominated by trees and woody vegetation.
Trees and other types of vegetation are essential for wetlands and stream corridors to
perform the important natural functions of stormwater storage, improvement of water
quality, erosion control,ground water recharge,and fish and wildlife habitat.
Stream corridors are located throughout the Tigard area, and exist as a defining feature of
Tigard's landscape. Vegetation within stream corridors lessens downstream flooding and
benefits water quality by slowing runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering pollutants. Also,
stream corridors provide vegetated corridors necessary for wildlife habitat, including travel
and nesting. The presence of trees within stream corridors is a significant enhancement.
Trees provide the shade necessary to maintain consistent water temperatures necessary for
healthy stream ecology. Additionally, trees supply leaves and woody debris that improve
channel stability,provide habitat structure,and contribute to a healthy food chain.
In addition to natural areas, ornamental landscaping and street tree plantings exist on private
and public property. This type of vegetation enhances the aesthetic character of Tigard
and provides other benefits such as shade, wildlife habitat, enhanced property values, and
buffering and screening between different types of land uses.
Urban Heat Island Effect
Buildings and paving, combined with low canopy and soil cover, increase the ambient
temperature within urbanized areas. This phenomenon is also known as the urban heat
island effect. According to research assembled by the USDA Forest Service in its
publication Western Washington and Oregon Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs and Strategic
Planning,for every 1°F increase in temperature within a city, there is a corresponding 1-2%
increase in demand for electricity. Beyond additional strain on the power grid, warmer
temperatures in urbanized areas have other implications. By increasing energy production,
fossil fuel power plants increase their level of CO2 production and cooling water
consumption, the level of municipal water consumption, creates unhealthy ozone levels, and
threatens human health through increased risks of heatstroke and disease.
In contrast, the presence of trees and greenspace within individual building sites may lower
ambient air temperatures by as much as 5°F as compared to outside the greenspace. A
robust urban forest can extend this effect across the city, modifying the urban climate and
conserving building energy use through the provision of shade, the natural process of
transpiration (converting moisture to water vapor, resulting in a cooling effect), and wind
speed reduction which reduces the infiltration of outside air into climate controlled spaces.
2
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
Air and Water Quality
Air and water quality are also enhanced by the presence of trees and other vegetation. Plants
absorb gaseous pollutants (e.g. ozone, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide) through leaf
surfaces, intercept particulate matter (dust, ash, pollen, smoke, diesel exhaust) dangerous to
the health of human lungs,and release of oxygen through photosynthesis. In addition,lower
air temperatures created through shade and transpiration reduces ozone levels, and
hydrocarbon emissions from energy production, and slows the evaporation of gasoline from
leaky fuel tanks and worn hoses (a principal component of smog).
A healthy urban forest also reduces the amount of water runoff and pollutant loading.
Leaves and branches intercept and store rainfall, thereby reducing runoff volumes and
delaying the onset of peak flows. Root growth and decomposition of fallen leaves and
branches increases the capacity and rate of soil infiltration by rainfall and reduces overland
flow. Additionally, tree canopies and other types of vegetative cover reduces soil erosion by
diminishing the impact of raindrops and surface water flow on barren surfaces
Socioeconomic Benefits
Views of trees and nature from homes, hospitals and places of employment provide
restorative experiences that ease mental fatigue and facilitate healing. Desk workers with a
view of nature report lower rates of sickness and greater satisfaction with their jobs when
compared to similar workers with no view. Additionally, nature within cities appears to have
a calming and restorative effect that reduces both short and long term stress to the body and
mind. People in general show less stress response if they've had a recent view of trees and
vegetation, and hospitalized patients with views of nature need less medication, sleep better,
and have a better outlook than patients without connections to nature.
According to research compiled by the USDA Center for Urban Forest Research, when
given a choice consumers were willing to pay more to shop and live in areas containing trees
and other vegetation in comparison to those without. In one study shoppers reported
longer and more frequent trips to well landscaped business districts, and were willing to pay
more for goods and services within those districts. Similarly, studies suggest that large and
well-maintained trees in residential areas can enhance "curb appeal" by as much as 3-7%
when comparing the sales price of properties with trees and similar properties without.
VALUES AND RESOURCES INVENTORY
Community surveys reveal that Tigard Citizens place high value on the protection of trees
and are concerned about the impact of development upon existing tree resources.
Community surveys conducted in 2004 and 2006 show that residents value their
neighborhood as a suburban retreat, a place that allows for views of trees and other natural
areas. The 2006 Community Attitudes Survey found "the protection of trees and natural
resource areas" as rating the highest of all "livability" characteristics posed to the
respondents, scoring 8.4 out of 10 points. Preservation of trees and other natural resources
scored higher on resident's livability index than neighborhood traffic (8.2), maintaining
3
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
existing lot sizes (7.8), pedestrian and bike paths (7.7), and compatibility between existing
and new development (7.6). This value is shared by residents of adjoining jurisdictions who
have recently established, or begun significant updates to, their tree management ordinances.
[Canopy cover measurements for 1996 and 2006 to be inserted here once completed]
Staff Commentary: Long Range Planning is currently working with the Metro Data Resource Center to
measure canopy cover in the years 1996 and 2006 using a consistent analytical protocol and at a level of
detail not seen in existing surveys. Unlike the 2002 vegetative coverage survey which only identified land units
of at least one acre in size, new software will allow the identification of individual trees. This will establish a
record of historical change over the last 10 years, and a baseline for future comparison. This data will be
inserted into this section once it has been completed. Existing vegetative coverage maps suggest a canopy cover
of approximately 11% when counting units 1 acre or larger, staff anticipates a higher percentage of canopy
cover to emerge from the new study.
Existing Regulatory Environment and Management Programs
Conditions and circumstances have significantly changed since the adoption of Tigard's
Comprehensive Plan in 1983. Rapid urban development has resulted in a general perception
that the city has experienced a significant loss of tree canopy, and other vegetation essential
for wildlife habitat, erosion control, slope stability, water quality, air-quality, and community
aesthetics. Driving this perception are METRO land use regulations, failed annexation
efforts and changing market conditions are resulting in higher density development than was
anticipated in 1983, further challenging the city to protect trees and canopy cover while
accommodating new development. Additionally, the City does not currently have a
comprehensive tree management and urban forest enhancement program to address these
issues in a unified and consistent manner. As a result there is general feeling among
residents, developers, and other stakeholders that the existing regulatory structure is not
adequate and hinders both the protection of trees and the orderly urbanization of the city.
As a result significant regulatory changes are desired by the environmental community,
residents and developers.
The City has historically relied upon its Development Code to manage and protect trees,
particularly heritage trees and those located within steep slopes,wetlands, and other sensitive
lands. In addition, trees within vegetated corridors surrounding wetlands, riparian corridors,
and other natural bodies of water are also protected by Clean Water Services as part of their
stormwater management program. These regulatory structures fife may not be sufficient. as
significant trees outside of those areas are not protected unless a development action is
pending, or prior conditions of development approval designated the affected tree(s) for
future protection. As a result the existing regulatory structure does not encompass a
significant number of trees across the city, which may be removed by the property owner
without City consultation or permit. Additionally, because the city does not have a
comprehensive tree removal consultation or permit system, protected trees have been
removed as a result of ignorance or disregard of city regulations and protections.
4
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
At present the city is currently unable to fully respond to stakeholder desires and changing
environmental conditions as the existing Comprehensive Plan does not provide the
legislative basis to develop enhanced standards and programs. Consequently the City must
update the Comprehensive Plan by establishing relevant goals, policies, action measures to
enable the development of adequate and comprehensive regulatory tools and forest
enhancement programs.
In partnership with Clean Water Services, the City of Tigard is midway through a series of
stream restoration and enhancement projects intended to improve water quality, reduce
erosion, and provide shade, structure and food sources to fish and other wildlife. Projects
currently underway within the City's floodplains and riparian areas will result in the planting
of approximately 100,000 native trees over a 10 year period (Fiscal Years 2001-2011).
Additionally over the last six years the City has planted an average of 50 street trees per year,
25 trees each arbor day,and 250 trees in parks,water quality sites, and other areas.
KEY FINDINGS
[key findings to be summarized once the background section is finalized]
GOAL, POLICIES AND ACTION MEASURES
GOALS
1. To enlarge, improve, and sustain the existing urban tree canopy and other
vegetative cover within the Tigard City Limits and Urban Scrvicc3 Arca to obtain the
economic, ecological,and social benefit of trees and other vegetation.
Staff Commentary:The reference to City Limits and the Urban Services Area was originally added
and is now removed by Staff as the applicability of Goals will be discussed in other sections of the
Comprehensive Plan.
POLICIES
1. The City shall maintain and periodically update policies, regulations and standards to
inventory, manage, preserve and enhance the community's tree and vegetation
resources to promote their environmental, aesthetic and economic benefits.
2. The City's various codes, regulations, standards and programs relating to
landscaping, site development, and tree management shall be consistent with, and
supportive of,one another.
3. The City shall require all development to minimize impacts on existing tree cover,
with priority given to native trees and non-native varietals that are long lived and/or
provide a broad canopy spread, and associated vegetation before, during and after
construction. Removal of trees shall be mitigated, with priority given to the
preservation of existing trees over mitigation.
5
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
4. The City shall manage tree and vegetation removal, and related restoration activities
within environmentally sensitive lands and on lands subject to natural hazards.
5. The City shall address public safety concerns by ensuring ways to prevent and
resolve verified tree related hazards in a timely manner.
Staff Commentary:The Board expressed a desire to see the terms "hazardous tree" and
"public safety"defined as there was a concern that the city may be obligating itself to
address private disputes in addition to true "public"hazards. .
6. The City shall require and enforce the mitigation of the aesthetic and environmental
impacts of impervious surfaces such as paved areas and rooftops through the use of
trees and other vegetation.
Staff Commentary: The Tree Board expressed a desire to see the phrase `aesthetic impact"defined.
7. The City shall ensure that street design and land use standards provide ample room
for the planting of trees and other vegetation, including the use of flexible and
incentive based development standards.
8. The City shall allow and require consideration of appropriate flexibility in site design
to allow tree preservation and planting in areas where survival will more likely occur,
particularly for trees that will grow large, including long-lived evergreens and broad
spreading deciduous varieties.
9. The City shall require all new development, including City projects to develop a
plan to preserve, install and maintain trees and other landscaping as part of land
development approval, with the chosen trees and other plant materials appropriate
for the site conditions.
10. The City shall require the installation of street trees, unless demonstrated infeasible,
on all new roads or road enhancement projects. Trees should be planted within
planter strips, or at the back of sidewalks if planter strips are not feasible or would
prohibit the preservation of existing trees.
Staff Commentary; The language of this policy was inserted to clarify the intent of the policy. The
City shall require the installation of street trees, but will not install them for private projects as
described in the original language.
11. The City shall establish and enforce regulations to protect the public's investment in
trees and vegetation located in parks, within right-of-ways and on other public lands
and easements.
6
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
12. The City's shall conduct an ongoing tree and urban forest enhancement program to
improve the aesthetic experience, environmental quality, and economic value of
Tigard's streets and neighborhoods.
13. The City shall cooperate with property owners other jurisdictions, agencies, utilities,
and non-governmental entities to manage and preserve street trees, wetlands, steam
corridors, riparian areas, tree groves, specimen and heritage trees, and other
significant vegetation within Tigard's City Limits and Urban Services Area.
14. The City shall continue to work with property owners to promote the preservation
of large trees, tree groves, and historic individual trees, through the City's Heritage
Tree Program and/or other methods as appropriate.
15. The City shall continue to maintain and periodically update approved tree lists for
specific applications and site conditions, such as street trees, parking lot trees, and
trees for wetland and riparian areas. These lists should emphasize native species, but
allow flexibility to choose a wide variety of species that are proven suitable for local
climate conditions and for specific uses and locations.
16. The City shall protect, preserve and enhance the scenic and environmental qualities
of Tigard's trees and vegetation, such as along creeks and rivers, and as scenic
backdrops on hills and ravines.
17. The City shall support efforts by community groups and neighborhoods to plant
trees and undertake other projects, such as restoration of wetlands and stream
corridors.
18. City regulations, standards and programs shall emphasize, where site conditions
allow, the planting of trees that will grow large, including long-lived evergreens and
broad spreading deciduous varieties.
19. The City shall prohibit the use or retention of nuisance and invasive trees and other
plants through the development review process. Additionally, the City shall maintain
a list of nuisance and invasive plants, discourage the sale and propagation of these
plant materials,and promote their removal.
Staff Commentary: The Board requested the phrase "nuisance and invasive"being defined.
20. Require development to preserve the cohesive quality of tree groves.
Staff Commentary: The Board requested a definition of"tree grove"for the purposes of this policy.
Such a definition could define groves in terms such as number of trees, their status as focal points,
defined ecological units, or some combination thereof
21. Require, as appropriate,the use of trees and other vegetation as buffering between
uses.
7
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
Staff Commentary:This qualification was added after discussion of scenarios where nonliving forms
of buffers, such as concrete or masonry walls, would be more appropriate or feasible.
RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES
1. Develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated update and enhancement
of all tree related regulations, standards, programs, and plans, including the
development of a citywide Urban Forestry Management Master Plan that will
establish measurable goals, standards and guide City actions regarding the Urban
Forest.
2. Develop and implement an inspection and enforcement program that will ensure
ongoing maintenance of trees and other vegetation required as part of development
approval.
3. Develop and implement an inspection and enforcement program that will ensure
non-development related tree management and removal complies with the City's
landscape standards and tree protection ordinances.
4.. Develop, implement, and require consideration of regulations, standards, penalties
and incentives that will allow developers to transfer density, seek variances or
adjustments, or utilize planned development procedures to preserve trees and/or
maintain natural open space.
5. Inventory and evaluate street tree, parking lot and landscape area plantings that have
failed due to inadequately sized planter strips, and determine if street trees can be
planted elsewhere in the right-of-way, or on private property.
6. Develop and maintain, as part of the City's GIS and permit systems, a publicly
accessible inventory of tree plantings, removals, and the state of the City's urban
forest.
7. Utilize impartial certified arborists as early as possible in the Development Review
process that will provide advice about how to properly address and resolve tree
protection issues.
8. Develop and distribute educational materials and programs regarding City policies,
regulations, and good arboricultural practices for the general public, developers and
city staff regarding tree planting, maintenance,and protection.
9. Identify and require consideration of new incentives and penalties that will
encourage developers to preserve trees and other significant vegetation.
8
• •
Tigard Tree Board
Discussion Draft
August 17, 2007
10. Encourage and promote the removal of nuisance/invasive plants, and the installation
of trees and landscaping that are low maintenance, drought tolerant, and require
minimal chemical applications.
11. Develop tree-mitigation regulations and standards to guide the City in assessing fees
or compelling compensatory action resulting from violation of its tree protection
standards and/or conditions of development approval.
•
9
• •
• It MEMORANDUM
IP
TIGARD 202?
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Marissa Daniels, Assistant Planner
RE: Hazards Comprehensive Plan Work Session
DATE: August 13, 2007
At the August 20`h Planning Commission meeting, staff will present the draft goals, policies, and
action measures of the Hazards section for Planning Commission review, discussion, and editing.
The draft goals,policies, and action measures were created based on a number of activities and
include:
• Tigard Beyond Tomorrow Visioning Process
• Community surveys over the past several years
• Tigard 2007 Resource Report
• Citizen review of draft goals at two Comprehensive Plan open houses
• Citizen input at Policy Interest Team meetings
These draft goals,policies, and action measures are intended to reflect the community's values and
aspirations for land use planning. They also aim to organize and coordinate the relationships
between people, land,resources, and facilities to meet the current and future needs of Tigard.
This meeting gives the Planning Commission the opportunity to ask questions of staff on the
concepts or content of the language that is included in the draft goals,policies, and action measures.
This is also the appropriate time to evaluate the citizen input versus the views of the Commission on
what it ultimately recommends to City Council. The intended outcome of the meeting would be a
consensus on the final draft goals, policies, and action measures that will be brought before the
Planning Commission for a public hearing on September 17t. To meet this timeline, a thorough
review of the materials before the meeting,with questions ready,will help to ensure a focused
review and discussion that is efficient. If unable to finish the review during the August 20th meeting,
it will continue to the September 17t meeting.
Remember, staff is available to answer any questions that you may have leading up to the meeting
and we encourage you to call or email. Getting all questions answered and the appropriate
information to help with the discussion will eliminate the need to schedule additional meetings
throughout the process of updating the Comprehensive Plan.
1
•
For questions on the Hazards chapter,please contact Marissa Daniels at 503-718-2428 or
Marissa @tigard-or.gov.
The attached material for each of the topics includes:
• Draft Hazards chapter including key findings from the Tigard 2007 Resource Report,goals,
policies, and action measures
• "Building blocks" based on the Tigard 2007 Resource Report,visioning process, and surveys
that were used with the Policy Interest Teams to provide them with a structure to help
develop draft policies. Additions/comments from citizens are color coded by the meeting
date.
• Community Issues/Values gleaned from the visioning process and community surveys
• Text from the current Comprehensive Plan to be deleted when the new goals,policies, and
action measures are adopted by City Council
• Staff input at Department Review Team meetings
To date, the opinions expressed by the Policy Interest Team have been in agreement with the
professional opinion of staff on all but two issues. The first issue is the way in which we define high
hazard areas. The Hazards Policy Interest Team prefers that hazard areas be defined by map for all
hazards. Currently, the floodplain is defined by FEMA map and landslide prone areas are defined by
text. Staff recommends against defining hazard areas by map as map error and map scale may
interfere with the accuracy of hazardous conditions. In the attached draft Hazards chapter, flooding
and wildfire hazards are defined by map and landslides are defined by text.
The second issue is the formation of a hazards home inspection program. It has been proposed by
the Policy Interest Team that the building department offer home inspections to property owners to
check for possible vulnerability to natural hazards. At this time, the building department does not
have the expertise to evaluate homes on this level. In many cases, a geotechnical or structural
engineer will be necessary to determine whether a home is truly at risk. Implementing this program
will require the creation of one or more new positions. Staff has also expressed concern about the
liability involved in determining whether or not a home is at risk of natural hazards.
Please note, hazards response is not covered in this chapter. Response will be included in the Public
Safety section of the Public Facilities chapter.
Included below are some definitions that may be helpful to your review:
Goal
Definition -A general statement indicating a desired end or the direction the City will follow to
achieve that end.
Obligation -The City cannot take action which violates a goal statement unless:
1. Action is being taken which clearly supports another goal.
2. There are findings indicating the goal being supported takes precedence (in the particular case)
over another.
2
• •
Policy
Definition-A statement identifying Tigard's position and a definitive course of action. Policies are
more specific than goals. They often identify the City's position in regard to implementing goals.
However, they are not the only actions the City can take to accomplish goals.
Obligation-The City must follow relevant policy statements when amending the Comprehensive
Plan, or developing other plans or ordinances which affect land use such as public facility plans, and
zoning and development standards or show cause why the Comprehensive Plan should be amended
consistent with the Statewide Land Use Goals. Such an amendment must take place following
prescribed procedures prior to taking an action that would otherwise violate a Plan policy. However,
in the instance where specific plan policies appear to be conflicting, the City shall seek solutions
which maximize each applicable policy objective within the overall context of the Comprehensive
Plan and Statewide Goals.As part of this balancing and weighing process, the City shall consider
whether the policy contains mandatory language (e.g., shall,require) or more discretionary language
(e.g.,may, encourage).
Recommended Action Measures
Definition -A statement which outlines a specific City project or standard which,if executed,would
implement goals and policies. Recommended action measures also refer to specific projects,
standards, or courses of action the City desires other jurisdictions to take in regard to specific issues.
These statements also define the relationship the City desires to have with other jurisdictions and
agencies in implementing Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
Obligation - Completion of projects, adoption of standards, or the creation of certain relationships
or agreements with other jurisdictions and agencies,will depend on a number of factors such as
citizen priorities, finances, staff availability, etc.
The City should periodically review and prioritize recommended action measures based on current
circumstances, community needs and the City's goal and policy obligations. These statements are
suggestions to future City decision-makers as ways to implement the goals and policies. The listing
of recommended action measures in the plan does not obligate the City to accomplish them. Neither
do recommended action measures impose obligations on applicants who request amendments or
changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The list of recommended action measures is not exclusive. It
may be added to, or amended, as conditions warrant.
3
l
1
I'
s