Loading...
03/08/2006 - Packet •� Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD Intergovernmental Water Board Name of Board,Commission or Committee M 6-r(,h 8, ;?,Go� Date of Meeting To the best of my knowledge this is the complete meeting packet. I was not the meeting organizer nor did I attend the meeting;I am simply the employee preparing the paper record for archiving.This record came from Greer Gaston's office in the Public Works Building. Kristie Peerman Print Name Signature 3 - 7 -13 Date Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Setxing Tigard,King City, Durham and Unincorporated Area AGENDA Wednesday, March 8, 2006 5:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions Call the meeting to order,staff to take roll call. 2. Approval of Minutes -February 8,2006 Motion from Board for minute approval. 3. Sherwood/Willamette River Water Coalition Presentation (20 minutes) 4. Asset Ownership Discussion - Commissioner Scheiderich(20 minutes) 5. Portland/Joint Water Commission Updates- Dennis Koellermeier(10 minutes) 6. Informational Items -Dennis Koellermeier 7. Public Comments Call for any comments from public. 8. Non-Agenda Items Call for non-agenda items from Board. 9. Next Meetings: ■ Joint meeting with the Tigard City Council Tuesday,March 21, 2006, 6:3Op.m. Town Hall ■ IWB meeting April 12, 2006, 5:30 p.m. - Water Auditorium 10. Adjournment-Approximate Time 7:00 p.m. Motion for adjournment. * Meeting begins at 6:30 p.m.The board will be notified of the approximate time they are scheduled when the Council's agenda is finalized. A light dinner will be provided. Executive Session: The Intergovernmental lVaterBoard maygo into Executive Session.If an Etecutive Semon is called to order,the appropriate ORS citalion will be announced identifiing the applicable statute.All Afemssions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Section. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executim Sessions,asprovided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any ftna!action or making arse final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Minutes March 8, 2006 Members Present: Patrick Carroll, Beverly Froude, Bill Scheiderich,Dick Winn and Sydney Sherwood(alternate for Tom Woodruff) Members Absent: Tom Woodruff Staff Present: Public Works Director Dennis Koellermeier M Recorder Greer Gaston 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes -February 8, 2006 Commissioner Carroll motioned to approve the February 8,2006, minutes;Commissioner Winn seconded the motion.The motion was approved by unanimous vote. 3. Sberwood/Willamette River Water Coalition Presentation (WRWC) Mr. Koellermeier introduced this item and relayed it would be the main topic of discussion when the board meets with the Tigard City Council on March 21, 2006. The founding document of the WRWC requires members who plan to expand the Willamette River water supply system to notify fellow members of their intentions.The City of Sherwood,having secured voter approval,and the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) have indicated their intent to go to the Willamette River and have given such notice.Tigard and other WRWC members now have 90 days to inform the WRWC if they want to participate in either the Sherwood or TVWD projects. The WRWC is made up of the TVWD,and the cities of Tigard,Tualatin,Canby, Sherwood and Gladstone. The Sherwood project will consist of the construction of a transmission pipeline from Wilsonville.Plant expansion is not part of the project, as Sherwood is negotiating to buy TVWD assets in the existing treatment plant.Due to issues of elevation,routing and timing, the Sherwood pipeline project offers little benefit to Tigard At the WRWC May meeting, Tigard's representative will need to relay Tigard's decision to participate in this project. Intergovernmental Water Board Minutes March 8,2006 1 The Willamette River intake pipe is sized for 120 mgd with 10 mgd capacity in the treatment plant.The later can be expanded in 5 mgd increments up to 120 mgd. TVWD has also given notice that they are pursuing a Willamette River project.The TVWD board directed its staff to build the necessary components to have water into their district within 500 days.This aggressive timeline has occurred since the TVWD is seeking to avoid having to purchase Portland water after the current contract expires in June. 2007. The TVWD project will include substantial treatment plant expansion and transmission pipelines which will travel through or adjacent to Tigard As with the Sherwood project,Tigard will need to make a decision regarding the City's participation in this project. In the TVWD expansion senario,the treatment plant would pump water into Tigard's 470- foot elevation storage reservoir and no further pumping would be required. Issues related to participation in the TVWD project include: ■ the vote to use Willamette River as a drinking water source ■ financing ■ participants If all WRWC members participate,a 96-inch diameter transmission line is proposed;this would be the largest water pipeline in Oregon.The project is complex and will require expensive infrastructure expansion. A legal analysis of Tigard's charter amendment,prohibiting the use of the Willamette River as a source of drinking water,is underway.Legal counsel may find the amendment does not prevent the City from participating in the expansion project, since a favorable Willamette River vote may occur in the future. The TVWD is meeting tonight to decide what to do regarding the Portland water contract. The outcome of this meeting may result in changes to their Willamette River project. 4. Asset Ownership Discussion Commissioner Scheiderich noted he had asked his fellow IWB members to investigate and report on any concerns they had regarding asset ownership. The topic arose due to the proposed remodel and the relocation of the Public Works Department into the water building.Commissioner Froude advised the Tigard Water District (TWD) had not met,but would take the item up at its next meeting. Commissioner Carroll summarized a letter detailing Durham's position on asset ownership, stating the water building was a system asset as defined in the intergovernmental agreement. If the building or portions of the building are used for purposes unrelated to the water system,then the water district should be compensated. If Tigard chooses to dispose of the building,this would need to be negotiated among the four IVB members.Commissioner Carroll added the building is an asset of the water service area and not the City of Tigard. The letter is on file in the IWB record. Intergovernmental Water Board Minutes March S,2006 2 Commissioner Winn reviewed the issue of asset ownership with Attorney Eileen Eakin. They concluded assets are part of the Tigard Water District and, according to the intergovernmental agreement, can be dispensed with by the city in which they reside. Since the water building is within Tigard's city limits,it falls under Tigard's jurisdiction. King City has no issues with asset ownership provided that any action taken does not affect the water distribution system,water quality,or create any financial exposure for King City. Commissioner Froude said she will contact the TWD chairperson and ask him to raise the asset ownership issue with their attorney. Mr. Koellermeier indicated he had shared plans to remodel the water building and by extension to determine its use.As discussed previously,the City will be moving ahead with the water building improvements, since the issue is a financial question rather than a use issue.The improvements will come from the Public Works Department budget and the City is focusing on the less expensive remodeling options. Improvements will begin in June or July and be completed by this fall. The remodeling and future operational costs will be shared among the building's various public works users. Commissioner Scheiderich clarified that the board's issue was whether the City pays overhead rent to the water fund for non-water related staff who occupy a water fund asset such as the water building. Is the building an asset for use in delivering water to the board's members? Mr. Koellermeier replied the water fund is not being asked to subsidize the capital or the operating costs. A question was posed about whether the water fund would receive any compensation for the non water related use of the building.For example,assuming some park functions will be housed in the water building,will the parks department pay overhead to the water fund?It was asserted that if the building is a water system asset,then revenue should go to the water fund. Mr. Koellermeier responded that in lieu of paying rent,the operational costs of the building would be paid by the building's occupants. In the past,operational costs, such as heat and water,would have been billed to the water fund. Commissioner Carroll said that in addition to the operational costs,the square footage of the building also had value. Mr. Koellermeier asked if it was the position of the IWB that this building be turned into profit center.Commissioner Scheiderich considered the building an asset of the water system and suggested non-water related users should be charged overhead.This revenue should be credited to the water system.This is a paper and money issue and should not delay the remodel. Intergovernmental Water Board Minutes March 8,2006 3 King City and Durham's positions on asset ownership differ as to which jurisdiction the asset belongs to -Tigard or the water system. Mr. Koellermeier suggested resolution to the issue will revolve around the definition of "other assets" versus "system assets" and which type of asset the building is ultimately determined to be. Other assets were generally described as assets that did not have value to the overall supply of the system.Under the IGA,these assets were transferred to the city in which they reside. This information is taken from an IGA and no fee or transfer of title occurred. Commissioner Winn said the IGA is straightforward and says other assets not necessary for the operation of the City of Tigard's water supply system, like the water building,become the property of the jurisdiction in which the asset is located.Mr. Koellermeier added that this language came directly from a provision in state law related to the dissolution of a water district. Commissioner Scheiderich stated the board was not finished discussing charges related to the use of the building, but recommended the City proceed with remodel.Commissioner Carroll said the building should remain for the benefit of the TWD, King City and Durham- not for the City of Tigard The item was tabled and will be revisited at the board's next meeting. Mr. Koellermeier suggested the attorneys representing the City and the TWD review the issue and determine if there is a solution.The fact that some portion of the building does house water operations makes this matter more confusing. NOTE: C m7 ssianer SAderuh left the mrti g at 6.•06 p.m. S. Portland/Joint Water Commission Updates Mr. Koellermeier relayed the joint Water Commission (JWC) is working on the final draft of the environmental impact statement.No major decisions will be needed until May or possibly November.Tigard is still a member of the JWC and will lease about two mgd for four months. This water will be used to fill storage facilities. Both Tigard and Lake Oswego have signed off on the IGA for a water system plan and work on the plan should begin soon.Consultant selection is ongoing.The study should: ■ help Lake Oswego identify how much water could be made available to Tigard ■ identify potential problems ■ provide information on the cost to develop and pump this source Lake Oswego has 34 mgd in senior water rights and some junior water rights. Mr. Koellermeier cautioned against factoring-in junior rights since they are subordinate to any state rights.Mr. Koellermeier said 9 or 10 mgd might be a reasonable amount of water to expect from Lake Oswego,with 12 mgd probably being an upper limit.The IWB's future Intergovernmental Water Board Minutes March 8,2006 4 need is anticipated to be 20 mgd. Tigard's ultimate solution could be a combination of water sources. Five wholesalers met again with Portland and the outcome was that Portland offered a conceptual 10-year contract along with the 20-year contract. Portland's profit is based on the bond buyer's index. In the 10-year and 20-year contracts,Portland's profit would be 1 percent or one-half of 1 percent respectively.The contract is still "take or pay." Mr. Koellermeier reported he has asked Portland about the original May deadline and if the City's decision can be delayed This will probably mean the City will go into next year with the existing contract and pricing. Issues surrounding the Portland contract include the length of the contract and take or pay terms. By pushing the Portland decision out,there will be more information available on other options. Tigard's approach may be to commit to a smaller amount of water through a contract and supplement this with cheaper interruptible water.The 10-year contract may work for Tigard. 6. Informational Items:None. 7. Public Comments:None. 8. Non-Agenda Items: Commissioner Winn recommended a publication called the Water of Life published by Scientific American.He asked if additional copies could be distributed to fellow board members. 9. Next Meetings ■ joint meeting with the Tigard City Council Tuesday,March 21,2006, 6:30 p.m.-Town Hall ■ IWB meeting April 12,2006, 5:30 p.m. -Water Auditorium 10. Adjournment At 6:34 p.m.Commissioner Winn motioned to adjourn the meeting;Commissioner Sherwood seconded the motion.The motion was approved by unanimous vote. Greer A. Gaston, IWB Recorder Date: iS- Intergovernmental Water Board Minutes March 8,2006 5 Agenda Item No.: IWB Meeting Date: Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Minutes February 8, 2006 Members Present: Beverly Froude, Bill Scheiderich, and Dick Winn Members Absent: Patrick Carroll,Tom Woodruff Staff Present: Dennis Koellermeier,John Goodrich, Greer Gaston Visitors: Henrietta Cochrun, Lisa Hamilton-Treick, Roland Signett Lake Oswego Staff:Joel Komarek 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions The meeting was called to order at 5:31 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes -January 11, 2006 Commissioner Winn asked that the first sentence in the last paragraph on page four of the minutes,regarding the scoring range,be changed to reflect this was a "correction" not a "suggestion."Commissioner Winn motioned to approve the January 11, 2006,minutes as amended,Commissioner Froude seconded the motion.The motion was approved unanimous vote. 3. Election of a Chair and Vice-Chair The board considered this item after agenda item#10,Non-Agenda Items. 4. Lake Oswego Presentation Public Works Director Koellermeier introduced Lake Oswego City Engineer Joel Komarek. Mr. Komarek gave a Powerpoint presentation which is on file in the IWB record. Topics covered in the presentation included: • History of Lake Oswego's water system development • Lake Oswego has senior water rights,which take precedence over the state's in- stream water rights. • Treatment plant is located near Mary S. Young Park. • Current water system was built in 1967. DRAFT Intergovernmental Water Board February 8,2006 1 • Tigard gets Lake Oswego water from the Waluga Reservoir by way of the Bonita Road pump station. • The $21.6 million improvements to "buildout" have not been done. • IGA with Portland is being considered for an emergency water system intertie. • Lake Oswego does not have a wholesale water contract with Portland, although the city does have connections to the Portland system. • A new water rule requires that municipal water providers prepare a water conservation and management plan. Lake Oswego will submit its draft plan to Oregon Water Resources this August. • Partners of the South Fork Water Board are Oregon City and West Linn. Lake Oswego has senior water rights for 34 mgd and this is not expected to be sufficient to meet the future demand of both Tigard and Lake Oswego. The amount of surplus water available after Lake Oswego completes its buildout is not known. Mr. Komarek explained Lake Oswego's ultimate water demand hinges on the development of the Stafford urban reserve area. Estimated water demand for this area ranges from 2 mgd to 5 mgd. Including these estimates,peak demand at buildout is expected to be around 26 mgd. Mr. Komarek reported the treatment plant can be expanded to 32 mgd on the existing city- owned property. This treatment facility might be developed for even greater capacity since new technology enables processors to treat more water on a smaller footprint. Lake Oswego owns additional property that could be considered for future expansion. Water pumping, transmission and treatment improvements are needed. The current intake is sized for 32 mgd. Both the raw and processed water transmission lines are deficient. Lake Oswego's retail water rate is 83 cents per hundred. Remaining issues: ■ How much water will Lake Oswego ultimately need when buildout is complete. ■ If the Lake Oswego supply is insufficient to meet Tigard's future needs, estimated to be 20 mgd, how does Tigard address the shortfall. S. Review the Intergovernmental Agreement for Joint Funding of a Water Supply System Plan with the City of Lake Oswego Public Works Director Koellermeier referred to the intergovernmental agreement in the board's packet. The agreement is scheduled to go before the Lake Oswego City Council on February 21 and the Tigard City Council on February 28. The cities will split the cost of the Water Supply System Plan; estimated total cost is $250,000. Public Works Director Koellermeier explained the plan will be comprehensive and will provide both cities with the information they need to decide if the proposed partnership will meet their needs.This means no further studies or research would be needed to implement the project. Commissioners Scheiderich and Winn stated they had read the agreement and had no concerns. The agreement has been reviewed by both cities'legal staff. DRAFT Intergovernmental Water Board February 8,2006 2 The timeline is to hire a consultant this spring and to have a draft plan available by the end of August. Mr. Koellermeier said the results of the Tigard/Lake Oswego plan will coincide with the decision on whether to continue as a partner in the Joint Water Commission project. A brief discussion on the Joint Water Commission (JWC) dam-raise project ensued. Concern was expressed over a previous discussion with JWC representatives who indicated if the project were downsized to a 25-foot dam,Tigard would not be able to participate and would lose all equity in the project. Before committing more funding to the dam-raise project, clarification on this issue was requested. Commissioner Scheiderich said he would like to see the feasibility studies capitalized. Mr. Koellermeier said he would prepare some information on this topic. Commissioner Scheiderich confirmed there was no further discussion and relayed the board was comfortable with the agreement. 6. Status Report on the Tigard Water Building Public Works Director Koellermeier referred to the cost allocation memo from Tom Imdieke and the Facility Needs Analysis executive summary in the board's packet. Various remodeling options and their corresponding costs were discussed briefly.The analysis determined the water building is not sufficient to accommodate the long-term needs of the Public Works Department;ultimately the department will need to relocate to a larger facility. Therefore, the less expensive remodeling options will be implemented. Money exists in the FY '05/06 budget for the remodel. Mr. Koellermeier stated he would slow the relocation process to allow the board members time to investigate the water building ownership issue. A legal analysis of the matter was mentioned. Commissioner Scheiderich suggested the members of the board should come back next month with any concerns they have regarding the wording of the existing intergovernmental agreement as it relates to the ownership of assets. Consensus was to discuss the matter next month. Mr. Koellermeier said he didn't want the remodel to be postponed until the legal analysis was completed because the analysis will only determine cost allocation. Commissioner Scheiderich said he assumed other city departments were being charged overhead and this was just a question of whether the water building overhead revenue would go to the general fund or the water fund. Commissioner Scheiderich added that he didn't think the issue of rent and what fund would receive rent payments should delay the remodel. He commented the building was somewhat of a "white-elephant" and was underutilized. Mr. Koellermeier said he would provide each member with a signed copy of the IGA. DRAFT Intergovernmental Water Board February 8,2006 3 7. Public Information Proposal from the Tigard Water District Public Works Director Koellermeier informed the IWB that the Tigard Water District (TWD) is working on a public information campaign. Mr. Koellermeier pointed out that a campaign focused on water source decisions will undoubtedly reach beyond the TWD boundaries and the IWB will probably become involved at some point. The TWD has retained a consultant to start working on graphics. 8. Informational Items City of Sherwood and Willamette River Public Works Director Koellermeier reported Sherwood has taken official action and has notified the Willamette River Water Coalition (WRWC) of its intention to develop the Willamette River as their water source. Tigard is a member of the WRWC and now has 90 days to decide whether it wishes to partner in the Sherwood project. In terms of size and alignment, the Sherwood project will be designed to meet Sherwood's individual requirements as opposed to taking a more global approach. A joint meeting between the IWB and the Tigard City Council is scheduled for March 21 since the City needs to respond to the WRWC within the 90-day time frame. Donation of a Portion of the Canterbury Site for Park Use Mr. Koellermeier advised the TWD had decided to hire an attorney to study the issue, so the matter is currently"on hold." 9. Public Comments Lisa Hamilton-Treick, 13565 SW Beef Bend Road, from the unincorporated Bull Mountain area, shared her thoughts on the following: • Boundaries and authority between the Tigard Water District (TWD), Intergovernmental Water Board (IWB) and the City of Tigard are unclear. • TWD owns valuable real estate. • Inquired if it was the original intent,when the IWB was formed, that Bull Mountain would be incorporated into the City of Tigard and the TWD dissolved. This may need to change given the failure of the annexation measure. • Intergovernmental agreements vary among jurisdictions. • Supports the Canterbury property be put to public use,but is not in favor of disposing of the property. Can't anticipate future needs. Suggested the property be leased to the City of Tigard for a dollar a year. • Tigard has over-reached its authority in the past, so wants an open, unbiased selection process for an attorney who can represent the interests of those who reside in the unincorporated area,King City and Durham. • Wants the decisions of IWB and recommendations of the TWD take into consideration that things have changed and hoped the interests of the rate payers in the unincorporated area, King City and Durham will be represented. DRAFT Intergovernmental Water Board February 8,2006 4 Public Works Director Koellermeier explained the TWD authorized their Chair to select an attorney. Ms. Hamilton-Treick said she had attended the meeting and this was not what she heard. Commissioner Froude added she was supposed to provide the TWD Chair with the names of three attorneys and she had not yet done so. Ms. Hamilton-Treick commented that she was surprised at the TWD meeting when the Chair said he would work with Mr. Koellermeier regarding the attorney and there was no discussion among the other board members. 10. Non-Agenda Items None. Note:Election of a Chair and Vice-Chair(agenda item #3) was considered at this time. .Commissioner Froude nominated Commissioner Scheiderich as board Chair, Commissioner Winn seconded the motion.The motion was approved unanimous vote. Commissioner Winn nominated Commissioner Carroll as board Vice-Chair, Commissioner Froude seconded the motion.The motion was approved unanimous vote. 11. Next Meeting- Wednesday,March 8, 2006, 5:30 p.m. - Water Auditorium It was also noted the IWB would have a joint meeting with the Tigard City Council at the Council's March workshop meeting. 12. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 p.m. Greer A. Gaston, IWB Recorder Date: DRAFT Intergovernmental Water Board February 8,2006 5 City of Durham 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. 97224 e-mail:d"ftchirsaJcomcasl.i�et a Phone (503)639-6851 Fax (503)598-8595 Roland Signett-Administrator/Recorder Linda Smith,Administrative Assistant March 6,2006 Mayor Craig Dirksen City of Tigard Tigard, OR Dear Craig, At its February 27 meeting the Durham City Council considered Tigard staff's proposals for use of the former Tigard Water District building and equipment yard on Burham Street in Tigard. The Council believes that these premises are a system asset as that term is defined in the Intergovernmental Agreements that formed the Tigard water service area. We believe that the four parties to these agreements share ownership of those premises and have pledged their shares to Tigard's use for operating the water supply system. For those reasons we support the Tigard staff proposals to use the premises for the water supply operation. Other City of Tigard operations are welcome to use the premises so long as an appropriate amount for overhead is charged against those other operations and those charges credited to the water fund. If the Tigard Council chooses instead to leave these premises vacant we will want an opportunity to discuss disposition of the premises and the distribution of any proceeds of sale or other disposition. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please call me with any questions or concerns presented by this letter. Sincerely,- v Gery Schirad , ay cc: Dennis Koellermeier Submitted at the IWB Meeting By: COmrh�'ss� ,.r Caste// Date: 3-$-Olo Agenda Item No.: Sign-in Sheet for Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting March 8, 2006 Name (Please Print) Do you want to speak to the Board? 4 44 r - Z4 / V Page 1 of l Greer Gaston - IWB Meeting Notice From: Greer Gaston To: Regal Courier Date: 2/16/2006 12:22 PM Subject: IWB Meeting Notice The Intergovernmental Water Board's March meeting notice is attached. Thank you, Greer Gaston City of Tigard Public Works greer@tigard-or.gov PHONE 503.639.4171 x2595 FAX 503.684.8840 file://CADocuments and Settings\greer\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 2/16/2006 Intergovernmental Water Board Senting Tigarr! King City, Durham and Unincorporated Area MEETING NOTICE Wednesday, March 8, 2006 5 :30 p.m. City of Tigard Water Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Tigard, Oregon 97223 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-6394171 FAx TRANsNuTrAL TIGARD Date: February 27,2006 Number of pages including cover sheet 3 To: The City of King City(Fax No.503-639-3771) 03"The City of Durham(Fax No. 503-598-8595) From: Greer Gaston,Confidential Executive Assistant Co: City of Tigard,Public Works Department Fax: 503-684-8840 Phone: 503-639-4171,ext.2595 SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Notice and Agenda MESSAGE: Please post the attached notice and agenda for the upcoming meeting of the Intergovernmental Water Board. Thank you. Intergovernmental Water Board Serving Tigard, King City, Durham and Unincorporated Area MEETING NOTICE Wednesday, March 8, 2006 5 :3 0 p.m. City of Tigard Water Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Tigard, Oregon 97223 Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting SennnB Tigard, King City, Durbam and Unincorporated Area AGENDA Wednesday, March 8, 2006 5:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions Call the meeting to order,staff to take roll call. 2. Approval of Minutes -February 8,2006 Motion from Board for minute approval. 3. Sherwood/Willamette River Water Coalition Presentation (20 minutes) 4. Asset Ownership Discussion - Commissioner Scheiderich(20 minutes) S. Portland/Joint Water Commission Updates-Dennis Koellermeier(10 minutes) 6. Informational Items -Dennis Koellermeier 7. Public Comments Call for any comments from public. 8. Non-Agenda Items Call for non-agenda items from Board. 9. Next Meetings: ■ Joint meeting with the Tigard City Council Tuesday,March 21, 2006, 6:30 p.m.''- Town Hall • IWB meeting April 12, 2006, 5:30 p.m. - Water Auditorium 10. Adjournment-Approximate Time 7:00 p.m. Motion for adjournment. * Meeting begins at 6:30 p.m.The board will be notified of the approximate time they are scheduled when the Council's agenda is finalised. A light dinner will be provided. Executive Session: The Intesg mmmental lVaterBoard maygo into Executive Session.If an Executive Semon is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identoing the applicable statute.All discurfions are confidential and those present may An.lose notbing jiom/fie Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided b ORS 192.660(4),but mast not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session mai,be held for the purpose a%taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public: hp officejet 4200 series 4215 Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Log for City of Tigard PW 5036848840 2/27/2006 10 : 26RM Last Transaction Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result 02/27 10: 25a Fax Sent 5036393771 1 : 04 3 OK hp officejet 4200 series 4215 Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Log for City of Tigard PW 5036848840 2/27/2006 10 : 28AM Last Transaction Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result 02/27 10: 27a Fax Sent 5035988595 1 : 02 3 OK