Loading...
10/10/2012 - Packet 41 Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD CCAC (City Center Advisory Commission) Name of Board, Commission or Committee 10/10/12 Date of Meeting 1 have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. C.L. Wiley Print Name Signature 11 /21 / 12 Date City of Tigard _ S; City Center Advisory Commission Agenda TIGARD MEETING DATE: Wednesday, October 10, 2012— 6:30— 8:15 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Red Rock Creek Conference Room 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. Welcome and Introductions.......................................................................................................6:30 — 6:35 2. Review / Approve September Minutes....................................................................................6:35 — 6:40 3. Non-Agenda Items/ Public Comment.....................................................................................6:40 — 6:45 4. Liaison/subcommittee reports...................................................................................................6:45 — 6:50 Art Subcommittee, Facade Improvement Joint Cmtee.,PRAB-CCAC Joint Cmtee. 5. Main Street Green Street Project................................................................................................6:50 — 7:20 Action item: Review documents and make recommendations for construction mitigation (Sean Farrelly) 6. Capital Improvement Plan Recommendations.........................................................................7:20 — 7:40 Action item:Make pr ject recommendations to Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (Sean Farrelly) 7. Economic Development Workshop............................................................................................7:40 — 7:55 Discuss priorities for October 16 Council)PCI CCAC workshop (Sean Farrelly) 9. CCAC Member Recruitment........................................................................................................7:55 — 8:05 Discuss current recruitment (Chair Craghead, Sean Farrelly) 10. CCAC Executive Session*...........................................................................................................8:05 — 8:15 Propery purchase discussion 11. Adjourn..........................................................................................................................................8:15 p.m. *EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission may go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— October 10, 2012 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 City Center Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes Date of Meeting: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 Location: City Hall Red Rock Creek Conference Room Called to order by: Chair Alexander Craghead Time Started: 6:30 pm (Executive Session 8:11 to 8:27 m Time Ended: 8:32 pm Commissioners Present: Alexander Craghead (Chair),Elise Shearer,Sherrie Devaney, Ralph Hughes,Thomas Murphy, P44 Thornburg ice Chair Commissioners Absent: Deanie Bush, Peter Louw,Linli Pao Others Present: Council Liaison Marland Henderson Staff Present. Downtown.Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly and Community Planning Senior Administrative Specialist Chris Wiley. AGENDA ITEM #1: Welcome, Roll Call and Introductions Chair Craghead opened the meeting and the roll call was recorded. AGENDA ITEM #2: Review/Approve September 12, 2012 Minutes All committee members present approved the minutes as amended. AGENDA ITEM #3: Non-Agenda Items / Public Comment A. Tom Murphy read an Oregonian article saying Lisa Sedlar,Modern Convenience Food Stores,has left her position as Executive Officer for New Seasons to start a new company focused on developing convenience markets which offer high-end groceries and products. Maybe we could approach her about locating one of her new stores in downtown Tigard. Tigard's Targeted Incentive Program (TIP)is still open through the end of January. Tom will send Sean the Oregonian article with all the information. B. Sean said there is a new business moving into the Harris-McMonagle Building on Scoffins Street. The new business markets supermarkets and foods and has 40 employees. C. Last month realtor Neal Brown addressed CCAC and asked them to consider endorsing a proposal for the City to purchase a commercial property he is representing in the downtown area that might be a good location for a YMCA operation. Representatives from the YMCA came out to look at the building this month and said it is too small to accommodate at YMCA operation. AGENDA ITEM #4: Liaison / subcommittee reports (CCDA,Art Sabcomittee, Frarade Improvement Joint Committee, PRAB-CCAC Joint Committee) A. CCDA. No update. B. Art Subcommittee. The art subcommittee will meet on October 17 to go over the procedure to review RFQ submittals. CCAC Meeting Minutes for Wednesday,October 10,2012. Page 1 of 3 C. Fa4ade Improvement Joint Committee. 1. Sean said they held a virtual meeting to approve the exterior paint for Wei Li Acupuncture 2. George Diamond,Real Estate Investment Group,is renovating and putting in offices in the space above Seishinkan Karate on Main Street (next door to Fanno Creek Brew Pub). Mr. Diamond applied for a facade grant. The Fa Bade Committee met and asked for some improvement in materials,etc. Mr. Diamond has come in for a permit and is working with the architect to make some changes to the fagade design, The grant hasn't been approved yet. D. PRAB-CCAC Joint Committee. Elise talked to three property owners who have property by Woodard Park. She gave them contact information for Steve Martin,City of Tigard Parks and Facilities Manager. E. TTAC (Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee). Elise attended the SW Corridor meeting that took place earlier this week. She shared the hand-outs she received with the committee members. One document depicted the project priorities list. Elise said the SW Corridor group explained the scoring process they used to rank the projects. The public seems to favor bus rapid transit over all other choices. Light rail is still in the future. AGENDA ITEM #5: Main Street/Green Street(see Attachment 1 to these minutes) The committee looked over the power point presentation and other project hand-outs that were provided in the meeting packet, Committee members were pleased with the information and level of detail it provided. They asked Sean to thank Engineering Manager Kim McMillan for the hand-out. Some members expressed concern about the large role that Kim will shoulder during the project. Sean said the consultants,Barney and Worth,will be assisting Kim. Members liked the idea of putting out information over Twitter and Facebook to let customers know all the businesses will remain open and on their regular schedules throughout the project. There was some discussion about where the temporary bus stops have been placed and some related nuisance problems. The downtown merchants are doing a great job handling situations as they arise. There should be a communication to the downtown businesses that aren't participating in CCAC meetings so they stay informed about what's going on with the project. Sean said the consultant has proposed communicating with downtown merchants through the ENEMA e-mail system. AGENDA ITEM #6: Capital Improvement Plan Recommendations (see Attachment 2 to these minutes) (Action item:Make protect recommendations to Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee T Sean Famlll) A. Sean distributed a hand-out listing the city's funded and unfunded projects. (Admin note:under `Terks,"Item 27, Parkland Acquisition, should not be highlighted.) The committee members discussed Clean Water Services plan to remeander the Fanno Creek Trail. The City is responsible for the cost to replace the bridge in that area once CWS realigns the trail. The members continued their discussion from last month about the possible revenues sources the city may be able to draw from to pay for a replacement bridge. Could Urban Renewal funds be used? CCAC members speculated that if the City commits the funds for the bridge now, that might serve as an impetus for CWS to move the project up on their list of priorities. The committee will make a recommendation to TTAC and PRAB asking for urban renewal funds for the project. B. The committee discussed developing Commercial Street from Lincoln Street to Main Street. Chair Craghead questioned why the environmental impact was ranked so high and why the safety aspect was ranked so low considering the amount of pedestrian traffic that goes through that area. Councilor Henderson said the project was funded at one time. Sean said addressing the viaduct issue makes this project very expensive. C. Elise asked why the gateways weren't on the list. Sean said the Main Street gateways are included as part of the Main Street/Green Street project. CCAC Meeting Minutes for Wednesday,October 10,2012 Page 2 of 3 D. The CCAC members asked if a column could be added reflecting their priorities in this graph as well. Sean will ask. AGENDA ITEM #7: Economic Development Workshop (Difmss priorities for October 16 Councilll'C/CCAC worksbop -Sean Farrelly) (see Attachment 3 to these minutes) Ralph and .Elise can make the workshop meeting next week. Sean said there will be a Community Development Director hired in the future who will take the lead with direction of council on this subject. Some CCAC members have been invited to attend the Meet and Greet for the finalists for the Community Development Director opening next Wednesday evening, October 17. Other projects to consider are future development in Tigard Triangle, the River'Terrace annexation and possibly the annexation of Bull Mountain and the Metzger areas. CCAC needs to consider the future economic impact of all these possibilities. Public/private partnerships are a viable way to pursue development in the community. AGENDA ITEM #8: CCAC Member Recruitment (Discuss current recruitment— Chair Craighead, Sean Farrelly) CCAC currently has no alternates. Members Pete Louw, Ralph Hughes and Alexander Craghead are also completing their terms the end of this year therefore so there will be several positions to fill. The deadline for submitting applications for upcoming CCAC openings is November 9. The committee members discussed resources for recruiting new members. - AGENDA ITEM #9: CCAC Executive Session* (propgv purchase discussion)—Commission Chair Craghead recessed the regular meeting at 8:11 p.m. and read the script to open the Executive Session to discuss real property transactions in accordance with ORS 192.660(2)(e). AGENDA ITEM #10: Adjourn At 8:27 p.m., the regular meeting reconvened. There was some general discussion about meeting logistics, etc. and the meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. C.L. Wiley,CCAC ReccZing Secretary ATTEST: air Alexan e a ead CCAC Meeting Minutes for Wednesday,October 10, 2012 Page 3 of 3 Upcoming meetings of note: October 15,Planning Commission Public Hearing on Downtown Connectivity Plan,Tigard Town Hall,7:00 PM October 16,City Council/Planning Com./ CCAC joint workshop on economic development,Tigard Town Hall,6:30 PM October 17,CCAC Art Subcommittee,Red Rock Conference Room,6:15 PM Cancelled November 14, Regular CCAC Meeting, Red Rock Conference Room, 6:30 PM December 4, CCDA Meeting,Red Rock Conference Room, 6:30 PM December 11,City Council Public Hearing on Downtown Connectivity,Tigard Town Hall, 7:30 PM CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— October 10, 2012 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 10/3/2012 ON rsa,d Main Street Green Street OPEN H 0 0 S F �r March 7. , 201. 2 ®e �a ya`"Paco�� Welcome Alain Street Green :Street Kim McMillian, City of Tigard s Arme i OCTOBER 10, 2012 CCAC MINUTES ATTACHMENT 1 ( 15 pgs) 10/3/2012 Project Overview Pedestrian and environment friendly! ✓ New Sidewalks; safer 3 Pedestrian crossings ✓ LED street lights ' Storinwater treatment ✓ Street trees,landscaping ✓ Public art ✓ Attractive streetscape Good News — Summer 01.,L 3 2 10/3/2012 Project Schedule Anticipated to be underway by late 2012 Summer 2012 Summer off! Fall 2012 Projects bid Winter 2012-2013 Contractor hired /construction begins Underground utilities work Winter/Spring 2013 Streetworkbegins Fall 2013 Project completion No construction between Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. 4 Downtown Survey: What We've Heard Concerns: Reduced access to businesses for vehicles (71%4) r Length of construction / disruption (71%) Time of day for construction (57%) Loss of parking (57%) Ideas to lessen impacts: ✓ Build portions of the project at night (SG%o) ✓ Provide timely updates to businesses (71%) Shorten construction to one year (57%) Construct one side of street at a time (57%) s 3 10/3/2012 Keeping Main Street Open for Business — Other Downtowns Business access • Plated curb for vehicle access �• . • Business signage � �7 • Flagging for deliveries • Accommodated delivery schedules • Weekly contractor/business owner meetings Lincoln City's busiest coffee shop remained open through construction. Rand)- Gartner, Kodiak Pacific 6 Business Signage ROAD CLOSED If AMP I[pfA�TRAIAI_�Ndi i DURING 3 O PEN(ONSTRUTION SUY l0 CAL,r At AE lt0 A4 ti10RK 7 4 7.0/3/2012 Keeping Main Street Open for Business — Other Downtowns Construction timing i�tExTAfS OY • Earle morning concrete work &LL • Nighttime utility~work • No construction over Thanksgiving / Christmas holidays • Coordinate with downtown events • Combination of day / night Early morning construction at busy diner in 'Mork yields best results Lincoln City allowed pedestrian access to remain open. 8 How can we keep Main Street Open for Business? Your top construction mitigation priorities? 9 x.0/3/2012 Marketing C amp aign fil Stl B'ITlx�x971,. L-�u�i�nta�A7 tl'Tila+arit lia�.z it 'ir-we-'w1 Clark Worth,Barney &%North, Inc. 10 What outreach methods and tools Survey Says. Cityscape newsletter (RO°'o) would be most Newspaper stories (60°x°) effective for Vetting Newspaper advertising(60%) the word out that Gateway signage (60%) downtown is open for business? www.tigard-or.gov/mainstreet UAW 11 6 10/3/2012 Next Steps ✓ Incorporate feedback in bid documents ✓ Sian et 2012 off. Fall 2012: Bid projects ✓ Late 2012 / Early 2013: • Contractor hired ■ Downtown open house ■ Launch Open f©r Bujaners campaign ■ Friday Coffees kickoff Kinn.'McMillan,Project Manager kimgti and-or. ov 503-718-2642 12 7 Tigard Main Street Green Street Improvements Construction Survey Results (March 1, 2012) Which best describes your connection to Tigard's Main Street? Business operator/employee 62% Shop/dine on Main Street 23% Property owner 15% What are your leading concerns about upcoming Main Street construction? Reduced access to businesses for vehicles 85% Length of construction/disruption 69% Loss of parking 62°! Time of day for construction 39% Noise 39% Bad publicity 391° Unsightly appearance 23% Dust and mud 23% Time of year for construction 15% Reduced access to businesses for pedestrians and bicycles 15% Another concern; 8% Should Tigard consider any of these ways to lessen construction impacts? I Build portions of the project at night 92% Provide timely updates on construction schedule/ activities to Main Street businesses 67% Shorten construction to one year(from two) 67% Construct one side of street at a time to preserve access and parking S8% I Conduct marketing and promotions to remind customers that Main Street is "Open for Business" 5�% Provide off-street parking options for employees and customers 5a14 Require contractor to control noise, dust and mud 42% Another method to lessen construction impacts: 17% Limit construction to daytime hours 8% What are the best ways to communicate that Main Street is "Open for Business"? Gateway signage 80% it Cityscape newsletter 70% Newspaper advertising 60% Newspaper stories 60% Promotional events 50% Radio advertising 40% Posters&Flyers 30% Another way to communicate: 20% Comments: Let's just get it over with as quickly as possible. Work at night. Require contractor to be done when he gives bid! Give incentive to him ONLY if job is done and finished on set date. Do not use same contractor as Burnham. This was not finished on time. Don't restrict access beyond absolutely necessary! Be sure it is open for business by appearing to be getting it done. I will take care of my business. You take care of making my job possible. I suspect it a fruitless exercise, but try to impress upon construction workers a "sensitivity" to consumers during construction. Quick as possible Night work-- incentives for contractor that will finish on time. Communications with businesses from the City. Get work done fast and efficiently to reduce impact on businesses. Listen to your business owners Without us there is no City of Tigard! Show everyday that it is moving to completion. Don't every let it look like it is stalled once it is started. Appearing to be stalled will cause people to go away forever, not just for a while. Keep traffic moving as much as possible and the businesses accessible. Do the work at night only. There are very few business open after 10 pm. April 2012 Tigard Main Street Green Street Construction - ,business Guide Main Street Green Street is a significant downtown improvement project to rebuild the southern half of Main Street, improve circulation and create a pedestrian friendly environment. The Main Street project will be underway by late 2012 with construction expected to take about one year. A top priority for the City of Tigard and Main Street businesses is to keep downtown "Open for Business" during construction. Downtown business operators and other interested community members helped create the following list of ways to minimize construction impacts on Tigard's downtown. The City of Tigard and its contractor promise to: Customer Access ✓ Keep Main Street open to traffic during - y , the business day. ✓ Keep access to businesses open. =yam Schedule night work to ensure sidewalk access during the day. ✓ Provide additional off-street parking for customers and employees. ✓ Suspend construction activities during holidays (Nov 21 —Jan 2) and planned Re A0 downtown events. IM1 WORK ✓ Post electronic reader boards at � downtown entrances, and sidewalk r' i 7 rr signage along Main Street. Electronic reader boards let customers know ✓ Coordinate with retailers on deliveries. downtown businesses are open! Communications ✓ Provide weekly updates for businesses. ✓ Operate a 24-hour construction hotline, ✓ Notify businesses of significant schedule changes. ✓ Develop a public outreach campaign with downtown businesses. ✓ Plan for a grand reopening event. Tips for Main Street Businesses The City of Tigard is committed to doing their part to keep downtown "Open for Business" during construction. There are also things businesses can do to help. Together we can make the Main Street project a community success. Get involved Other ideas Q Stay current—go to Q Consider extending business hours www.ti_qard-or.gov/mainstreet Q Find new ways to get your message out Q Attend project update meetings Q Partner with other businesses on creative Q Keep project contact numbers promotions close at hand Q Coordinate delivery times with the Q Get to know the construction foreman contractor Inform your customers Q Host a grand reopening event when Q Be positive construction is over Q Put up signs Q Provide access information �,� Tigard Main Street Green Street Communications Plan (Rev.812912012) Main Street Green Street Project The City of Tigard is undertaking a major project to rebuild Main Street, an important route in the heart of the city. Project design is underway, and construction is anticipated to begin in early 2013. Tigard is committed to maintain open communication throughout the yearlong project with business and property owners who may be affected, as well as citizens of Tigard. Communications Plan The Communications Plan for Tigard's Main Street project details project messaging, communications activities, schedule and communications team assignments. The plan has been developed with input from downtown business and property owners, City staff and experts in downtown construction. Downtown business and property owners were engaged in the design of the project over the last several years. At recent meetings, downtown stakeholders provided feedback on construction mitigation and communications measures. The following mitigation measures were agreed to by the City of Tigard and will be reflected in construction bid documents as detailed in this Communications Plan. The City of Tigard and its contractor will: Customer Access ✓ Keep Main Street open to traffic during the business day. ✓ Keep sidewalk access open for all downtown businesses—during each business' operating hours. Schedule night work as needed to ensure sidewalk access is maintained during the day. Provide additional off-street parking for customers and employees, ✓ Suspend construction activities during holidays (November 21-January 2)and planned downtown events. ✓ Post electronic reader boards at downtown entrances, and sidewalk signage along Main Street. ✓ Coordinate with retailers on deliveries. Communications ✓ Provide weekly updates for businesses. ✓ Operate a 24-hour construction hotline. ✓ Notify businesses of significant schedule changes. ✓ Conduct a public outreach campaign in partnership with downtown businesses. ✓ Plan for a grand reopening event. Tigard Main Street Green Street 1 Communications Plan Messaging • Main Street Green Street is a significant downtown improvement project to rebuild the southern half of Main Street, improve circulation and create a pedestrian friendly environment. • The finished product will encourage people to enter the Downtown area, support local businesses. • The project incorporates "green street"features such as stormwater planter boxes to capture and treat stormwater runoff, energy efficient LED lighting, street trees, and landscaping. • Aging water and sewer lines will also be replaced. • Main Street Green Street is one of the key catalyst projects identified in the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan and is intended to stimulate reinvestment in the Downtown. • Public art creating an inviting streetscape will be incorporated in places accessible to everyone. • The Main Street project will be underway in early 2013 with construction expected to take about one year. • A top priority for the City of Tigard and Main Street businesses is to keep downtown "Open for Business" during construction Communications Activities f Tools 1. City Council briefings: Tigard City Council will be briefed on project progress at key intervals through briefings, reports and the Council newsletter. City Council members will also be invited to participate in downtown events and will receive project updates and information materials.. 2. Proiect partner updates: Oregon Department of Transportation and Metro representatives will be updated throughout the project through design team meetings and contacts with the City's project manager. 3. Website 1 webpage: Timely information on the Main Street Green Street project and utility repair/replacement will be posted 1 updated on the City of Tigard's website (www.tigard-or.govlMainstreet}. Updates may be announced to interested stakeholders through social networking tools such as Twitter and Facebook. 4. Community briefings: City staff will offer presentations on the Main Street Green Street project at the regular meetings of interested community organizations—City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC), downtown merchants, Chamber of Commerce, business and service clubs, homeowners associations, etc. 5. Business 1 property owner notification: Main Street project area business operators and property owners will be notified during project design, prior to start of construction, before any significant disruptions, and at key project milestones, Communications methods will include: Tigard Main Street Green Street 2 Communications Plan • "Meet the Contractor" Open House: Downtown business and property owners will be invited to an Open House to meet the selected contract, prior to the start of construction. • A.M. / P.M. coffees: The project manager and construction superintendent will be available to meet with interested stakeholders weekly (or as needed), at both early morning and after hours events, for coffee/ refreshments and informal chats on construction progress, and to communicate upcoming activities (and disruptions), problems encountered, complaints, etc. The coffees will continue as long as warranted — i.e., as long as the sessions continue to attract guests. Notifications: (Email, doorhangers, flyers, Facebook, Twitter, website). Electronic communications will be created and distributed periodically to area businesses/ property owners, City staff and other subscribers. Frequency and content will be adapted as needed for construction activities: monthly, weekly— or even daily. Email blasts will go out whenever something new is happening on Main Street or in the downtown. The City will consider using an electronic newsletter and database management tool such as Emma or MailChimp, • 24/7 hotline: A construction hotline phone number(and email address)will be established at the project outset. The hotline will be widely publicized in the project area before and during the construction period. Protocols will be established for responding to hotline calls /emails. • Fact sheets / updates: Project fact sheets will be prepared and distributed across the project area during the design phase, and before construction begins. The fact sheets will be updated periodically during construction to reflect current project status. 6. "Open for Business"communications_: A top priority for the City of Tigard and Main Street businesses is to keep downtown "©pen for Business" during construction. Downtown business operators and other interested community members helped create the following list of ways to communicate to shoppers that businesses will remain open. • City communication tools: Project information will be made available in multiple formats: for the City's monthly newsletter Cityscape, neighborhood newsletters and blogs. • News media outreach: The communications team will groom stories about the Main Street projects in the Tigard Times, Oregonian and other area newspapers and media, to announce the project, extend event invitations, provide timely information and signal project milestones/achievements. • Coordinate with downtown marketing: The communications team will support the current downtown campaign promoting downtown businesses The Main Street project will contribute to ads developed by the downtown marketing group. • Kickoff Event/ 3`d Fridays: The City of Tigard will host events in partnership with the downtown marketing group: Downtown 3'" Friday and other community events. The series of events will be organized to capture/inform/involve target participants, disseminate/reinforce project messages, and promote face-to-face connections between project team members and key stakeholders. Events will include: ✓ Contests, Giveaways, "Fun" Elements ✓ Celebrations: Groundbreaking, "Halfway Party", Grand Reopening Tigard Main Street Green Street 3 Communications Pian ✓ "Thor(our canine project superintendent)Tours Downtown" • Business and employee orientations/2nd Thursdays: Tigard staff will schedule a series of face-to-face meetings with groups of business operators and property owners in the project area to acquaint them with construction mitigation measures and the "Open for Business" campaign. These orientations will enable the project team to develop relationships with downtown business owners and recruit their participation in spreading the word that businesses are open. After the initial orientation meetings, City staff will participate in 2nd Thursdays coordination meetings for business owners. • Business Packet: In support of the business and employee orientations, the City will prepare business packets including project fact sheets, parking maps, schedule, and outreach materials that businesses can pass on to their customers. • Displays: A map will be created for permanent display at the Chamber, City Hall, library, banks, and other locations. A poster-size version of the project map will be created for businesses to display on their premises. • Project signage: The City of Tigard will install distinctive informational/interpretive signage to let citizens know that Main Street and downtown Tigard remain 'open for business". Electronic reader boards will be posted at downtown gateways, as well as sidewalk signage along Main Street. City Council briefings City Council!City Manager Council packets 1 newsletter PuNic,Works Director 1 City Engineer CM staff meeting Redevelopment Project Manager g ODpT 1 Metro representatives Design team meetings Open houses SOrT*uurmess owners(Phase 1) Business packet Some property owners(Phase 1) AM i P M coffees Tigard Development Agency Kickoff Event(3rd Friday) City Center Advisory Commission Business posters Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce Contractor Mailing rist(s) Interested Targeted mardrngs!Emma updates -Other business!property -Downtown residents Business marketing partnership(2nd Thursday) owners(Phase II) -Loyal customers Business packet parking maps schedule,other -Transportation Advisory -City of Tigard employees Business r employee orientations Committee -Clean Water Services Notetcation email,doorhangers flyers. -Service clubs Tualatin River Keeper Facobook.Twitter,Wobsite,fact sheets -Dog owners Bike/ped community 24fI Hotline -T;pard-Tualatin School -Emergency services District -TriMet Displays Chamber,City Nall,library,banks.other Protect signage Not Yet Interested Cdy+scape articles Tigard Times;Oregonian r Oa reonLuvo com Most commurkty members Advertising billboards newspaper radio Contests,giveavoyb "fun"elements C-elebralons "Mat my Party` grand reopening Community events "Thor tours" Neighborhood newsletters btogs Tigard Main Street Green Street Communications Pyramid Tigard Main Street Green Street 4 Communications Plan Outreach Schedule Task Date Preparations June-January 2013 Develop communications tools for business owner and "Open for Business" communications. Business owner notifications: • Email template, flyers, doorhangers, Facebook, Twitter, website "Open for Business" communications: • Participate in 3rd Fridays and 2nd Thursdays • Develop business Packet • Business and employee orientations Construction bids January 2013 1. City Council briefings 2. Project partner updates 3. Website /webpage updates Community briefings January 2013-ongoing Contractor hired /construction begins Winter 2013 4. Business/ property owner notification • Open houses • A.M. / P.M. coffees • Notifications • 24/7 construction hotline • Fact sheets/ updates b. "Open for Business"campaign City communication tools • News media outreach • Coordinate with downtown marketing • Kickoff Event/ 3rd Fridays • Participate in 2nd Thursdays • Project signage Project completion Spring 2014 Tigard Main Street Green Street 5 Communications Plan Assignments Tasks City Project City Public Construction Barney& Manager Information Manager Worth 1. City Council briefings • O 2. Project partner updates • O O 3. Website 1 webpage • • O 4. Community briefings • O O 5. Business 1 property owner notification • Open houses • O O • A.M. 1 P.M. coffees • O O • Notifications: (Email, doorhangers, flyers, 0 0 O O Facebook, Twitter, surveys, website): • 2417 construction hotline 0 O • Fact sheets/ updates O • O 6. "Open for Business" communications • City communication tools O • O • News media outreach O O • Coordinate with downtown 0 O O marketing • Kickoff Event/3rd Fridays • O O • Business and employee orientations/2nd O • Thursdays • Business Packet O O • • Displays O • O • Project signage • O O O Key: • Lead responsibility O Support responsibility Tigard Main Street Green Street 6 Communications Plan Agenda Item 6 L vllo(e C Fiscal Year 2013 -2017 1 Capital Improvement Plan (/-Oiect / Street System Page Project Project Name Projected 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Totals 2011-12 7 95001 Pavement Management Prop,,ram 1,120,000 1,470,000 1,660,000 1,950,000 2,340,000 2,850,400 11,390,000 8 95015 121stAvenveImprovements 0 0 0 0 2,425,000 1,425,000 3,850,000 (Whistler Lone to Tippitt Street) 9 95023 Walnut Street Improvements 0 0 0 0 1,250,000 250,00{1 1,500,000 (116th Avenue to Tiedemon Avenue) 10 95027 Citywide Pedestrian and Cyclist 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 846,000 Improvements 11 95433 Pacific Highway/Gaarde Street/ 327,671 242,265 2,234,689 221,053 3,509 0 3,02'_'1387 McDonald Street Improvements 12 95035 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street 55,000 1,405,000 0 0 0 0 1,460,000 Intersection Improvtments 92nd Avenue Sidewalk 13 95037 (Waverly Drive to Cook Pork) 0 490,000 0 0 0 0 490,000 14 97003 Main Street/Green Street Retrofit 295,825 1,035,454 66,667 D 0 0 1,397,946 15 97017 Main Street/Green Street Improvements 0 0 0 550,000 550,000 0 1,200,000 Phase 2 16 97018 Main Street Bridge Painting/Rehab 0 0 35,000 1,390,000 0 0 1,42,004 Total Funded 1,939,696r NMI 4,E66,000 2013-2017 Capital Imryravement Plan I 5 Fi_ tP1 Y�rr � O - 20 > Capitdi imprcve.Tlsir: Play Street System Piolectesi Page i prni rt I project i9xrere — - F 2013-17 7.612 33 2.013-11 I ;0144 ?5 ' 7015- 16ZllE6-17 Totals 7 9500 ' la2ii'00 1,4 7)0,no0 _ vLo'DC ! 79_0,000 2,340,000 12950,000 - 11,390,OCO l i 1— 5 G rule isrpmvemenrs D D C 0 2,s25,000 I 1,425,000 '3,050,000 S x1: to lropitt stc..et) }-- . .. 1r e ITprmeRni 1 1 9 95r2- 1 rE ilver Exq Ti acrnc_ Avrnue) 0 ti 1 '0,070 I 50,000 :,500,000 r.iDrfy+ icia PCAsstrarl and CYi;dst r [ f' 1 1-^i,i"L"v i 1 * 'H., 141 100 14".,UOfi 141,000 8A6,000 1 1 u+. - fi,. h�q�.war/fiaarde $tsecl,i i - ! I E%F nt 3f> j2 2r4` ,,, _LS3,5C9 � 0 3,025,397 5 ii 0— � U iAfi0,00O 1 fi 9 ,.J 0 — 0 0 490 000 v�r1q ur ve to Ccoll;L44 SO, - -- - _� - flair. $iroe:/Green Street Retrofit .G23 t Of_ .>,= ! ;:SES? I G 0 0 1.,397,9:16 SIr^vi/Green 5l!eetimprove;n_eru moi— _ — f - 1 Phase 9 i 0 550,000 550,000 0 1,1046'04 } .err, i Main Street Bridge Painting/flehab V „ g 0 ?�:,,GL'^, 0 0 1,:75„000 � r [;;1 i OCTOBER 10, 2012 CCAC MINUTES ATTACHMENT 2 ( 20 pgs) Fiscal Year 2013—2017 I Capital Improvement Plan Unfunded Projects g9-9D Unfunded Projects The Unfunded Projects section includes all projects that were part of the process for consideration and came from master plans,and citizen and staff nominations.The list contains only those projects that are unfunded due to limited resources and lower priority ranking.This list does not include those projects within a master plan that fall outside of the five-year period and/or are too expensive for city resources. 201j-2017 Capital Improvement Plan 1 87 Unfunded Projects External Costs Internal Costs Project Mame land./RDW Design and Construction Environmental Project Construction I Public Total..s Acquisition Engineering managerreent Management Invaivement Street System 121st Avenue Improvements 300,C00 75,0G0 1,000,000 0 42,000 100,000 0 1,517,000 (Walnut Street to North Dakota Street) 135th Avenue/Walnut Street 0 50,000 351,0(10 0 SD,d00 50,000 0 501,000 Intersection Improvement 72nd Avenue Improvements 2,000,000 300,000 3,001,000 0 84,000 12(1,000 0 10,505,000 (Bonita Road to Nunziker Street) 72nd Avenue Improvements 2,000,000 40{',000 6,000,000 D 84,000 120,000 0 8,604,000 (Nunziker Street to Dartmouth Street) Ash Street Crossing of the 2,000,000 250,000 1,000,000 0 100,000 150,000 0 3,500,000 WES Rail Line Pedestrian/Bike Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 along Railroad Tracks Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/ 0 170,000 4,700,000 0 84,000 125,000 0 5,084,000 Hunziker Street Realignment Tunnel/Connector to Tigard Street Trail at 95th Place 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Street 0 45,000 1,200,500 0 31,000 130,000 50,000 1,456,500 (tincoln Street to Main Street) Frewing Street Sidewalks 0 20,000 200,000 0 20,000 20,000 0 260,000 Greenburg Road Improvements 100,000 110,000 333,000 0 70,800 60,000 0 673,800 at Cascade Avenue Hall Boulevard/McDonald Street 75,000 75,000 250,000 0 42,000 50,000 0 492,000 Intersection Improvement North Dakota Street Bridge 0 200,000 2,000,000 0 63,000 2.0(1,000 D 2,463,000 Replacement Pacific Highway/72nd Avenue 200,000 140,600 1,600,000 0 50,000 120,01)4 0 2,1101000 Pacific Highway/Dartmouth Street 1,000,000 450,000 6,000,000 0 50,000 500,00() 0 8,000,000 Tiedeman Avenue/North Dakota 2,0(10,000 799,000 6,001,000 0 200,000 500,0(1(1 D 9,500,000 Street/Tigard street Realignment Tigard Street Bridge Replacement 0 200,000 2,000,000 0 63,000 200,000 0 2,463,000 Tigard Triangle LID 0 167,242 2,154,503 0 55,200 125,000 0 2,501,945 Walnut Street 1.500,000 300,000 3,001,000 0 84,000 250,000 0 5,135,000 (Tied"within mon Aene to Pacific Highway) ear period.Refer to Water Master Plan for future projects. Parks System Bonneville Power Admin Trail 45,000 26,500 65,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 146,500 Brown Property Trail 0 70,260 505,780 0 15,000 15,000 0 606,040 Cach Park Development 0 40,000 401,000 0 75,000 40,000 0 556,000 Fanno Creek Park:Gateway 0 85,000 765,000 0 0 0 0 850,000 Turf Fields(2)in Community Parks 0 300,000 2,000,000 0 124,000 120,000 25,000 2,565,000 Downtown Clock Tower 25,000 75,000 250,00() 0 150,000 150,000 25,000 675,000 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Pian 1 39 UnfundedProjects (continued... External Costs Internal Costs Protect Name Land/ROW Design and Construction Environmental Project Construction Public Totals Acaaistion Engineering Management Management Involvement Parks System Icantinued...) Fanno Creek Park:Plaza 2,100,000 320,000 2,457,000 0 42,000 78,000 0 4,997,000 Fanno Creek Park: Reconstruction of 0 39A,84 1,847,350 0 SD,OQO 0 0 ?,292,194 Other Paths and Bridges Fanno Creek Trail (Railroad ROW Loop) 2,146 44,000 550,000 D 10,000 10,000 0 616,146 Fanno Creek Trail (Woodard Park to Grant Street) 0 25,000 560,000 0 21,000 10,000 0 616,000 Fanno Creek Trail 40,000 40,000 650,000 0 20,000 60,000 0 810,000 (Bonito 5treet/74th Avenue to took Pork) Fanno Creek Trail Bridge Replacement 0 29,470 235,600 0 10,000 40,000 0 315,07D (CWS Re-meander) Pacific Hwy at Hall Boulevard Gateway 0 35,000 225,000 0 21,000 0 0 281,000 Proposed Trail Corridor(1'4) 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 Senn Park 0 7,708 135,000 0 42,000 0 0 184,708 Tigard Triangle Area(P3) 0 80,000 176,300 0 32,000 0 0 288,300 Woodard Park 251000 30,000 2,000,000 0 60,000 60,D00 5.ODD 1,180,000 (Parking on Katherine Street) Storm System Buricrest Drive (Summer Crest to 121st Avenue) 0 14,600 56,700 0 3,200 6,500 0 81,000 Storm Drain Upgrade:Canterbury 0 20.000 78,500 0 4,500 9,000 0 112,000 (106th Avenue to Pacific Hwy) Sanitary Sewer System None within five-year period.Refer to Sanitary Sewer Master Plan for future projects. Expand City Hail into Police Facility 0 316,154 2,107,692 0 105,385 210,769 0 2,740,000 New Police Facility 1,035,927 1,672,962 12,649,431 0 297,680 2,000,000 0 17,656,000 New Public Works Yard/ 31500,000 1,215,000 8,101,000 0 125,000 810,000 0 13,751,000 Decommission Ash Street Yard Relocate Police to Intermediate 435,000 702,500 4,401,500 0 1?5,000 1,750,000 0 7,414,000 Facility at Water Building NOTE: All projects come frond master plans, city staff and Tigard citizens. This list does not include all projects, but all unfunded projects considered for this 5-year C(P only. 90 1 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2013 —2017 1 Capital Improvement Plan Project Rankings 81 CIP Ranking Worksheet 83-85 Final Ranking scores The following matrix shows all of the projects within the five-year period that were scored and prioritized by citizen member boards along with city staff.Citizen member boards such as the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee(TTAC)and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board(PRAB) provided substantial input in the selection of those projects that were to be funded. TTAC scored all street projects and PRAB members scored those projects within the parks system.Staff representatives from the CIP Management Team include Community Development, Public Works and Finance. Each citizen member,along with staff from the CIP Management Team,score each project based upon an agreed upon criterion.Total scores are then calculated for each project with TTAC and PRAB scores given equal weight as staff.A final combined score is then calculated for each project. Projects are prioritized based on these scores and available funding is assigned to those projects with the higher scores. • Every year,the CIP project list is developed from the existing CIP,Master Plans,staff,and citizen member committee nominations. Note:Only those projects from Master Plans that fall within the five-year period are included on the list. • The list of projects is prioritized by the city's CIP Management Team along with citizen member boards and committees including the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board(PRAB)and the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee(TTAC).All projects are prioritized using specific criterion pertinent to each system.These projects are ranked based on criteria ranging from public health and safety to funding partnerships. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 0 to 5(see page 81). Project scores between the CIP Management Team and the citizen member committee are each given equal weight and combined to arrive at a final score for each project(seepages 83--85), • Projects are ranked based on their individual scores and funding is applied to those with the highest scores.Those projects that are already under construction are not ranked as it is known that they are already funded and will continue. 2013-2017 Capital improvement Plan I 79 CIP Ranking Worksheet Rating Criteria High Medium L The project eliminates Reduces a current and Mitigates a potential Public Health a current and present Has no impact on Degrades public health and Safety public health or present public health public health or public health or safety, or safety. N/` or safety tandition. safety risk. safety condition. Cleans up past Har,negative impacts Environmental The project Alleviates an ongoing degradation or Has negative impact on the environment substantially improves degradatfon to the on environment whish N/A Impact the city's environment. environment. degradation. mitiggatedprevents future is mitig;ted. that ratedannot 6e . The project is required Is needed to bring aDoes not make any Moves the system to meet a state or No state or federal Federal or State sy tem component up f progress toward I further away from Mandates federal permit or to federal or state standards apply to [netting state or state or federal N/A other enfrequirement. standards. this project. federal standards. requirements. requirement. The project improves Improves city wide Improves livability/ Improves livability/ Livability/Vitality city wide livability/ Docs not improve for livability/vitality for vitality for some vitality for N/A vitality y most segments. segments. few segments. livability/vitality. all segments. The project is listed Is needed to reach Council Goals Indirectly relates Does not relate to Is contrary to a or Interest specifically as a at least one to one goal. any council goals. council goal. N/A council goal. council goad. Has mixed support Has mixed support with People do not have a Community The project has wide Many people oppose Interest community support. the project with most an even split of support opinion(do not care) the project. NSA in support. and opposition. about the project. The project will pay for Will pay for its self Adds to operational Adds operational cost Adds to operational is self over less than in less than five years but the cost is paid Cost Effectiveness five years in reduced in reduced cost cost but is the least life for with increased cosi to the city. to citizens. cost without N/A cycle cost alternatioperational revenue. alternative. revenue offset. Alleviate a risk that Alleviate a risk of Alleviate a risk of Alleviate a risk that Alleviate a risk that threatens life or system failure causing system failure causing System Reliability threatens in severe results in minor loss N/A would result in inconvenience to inconvenience to the irreparable harm property loss. of property. the public. city staff. The project fully Fully implements Does not implement Implements a implements at at least one Makes progress a recommendation in Is not consistent Master Plan more than one recommendation in an toward meeting a an adopted plan or with any adopted N/A recommendation in an adopted master plan. master plan goals. is not anticipated in system plan. adopted master plan a master plan. The project is fully Design is done,permits 1>funded and ready to Readiness to funded,is under and right of way has start but no work has Has partialfunding. Is not funded. N/A Proceed construction or bids been secured. been completed. have been received. The project has grant Is listed for a grant Is funded by a low Funding funds awarded and and is likely to receive interest loan that Has multiple funding Is only funded from Partnerships will lose them if it does funding duringthe are time sensitive, sources which are not N/A or is eligible for a time sensitive. not proceed. budget cycle. city resources,future grant. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Plan 1 81 a w = Fi al Scores s 1° d to V C t a` w C = V A wmj E : +n a A e AC a a a _ 2E i wN` M w = y Z N 10 m ea+ E `o `a l7 c a d� E 'M _ E� W E E m K uG n u System Project Name a w +" a W u° w u i Comments Awarded $1.15 million funding from Metropolitan Main Street/Green Street- Transportation Streets Phase 2 3.00 5.00 0.00 4.00 ]4.005.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 34,00 36.00 +1 Prcgram IMTIPj. Project expected to begin in FY Walnut Street 2015.Qualifies Streets 1116th to Tiedeman Avenue) 5.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 33.00 - 37.00 for MSTIP. Locally funded 121st Avenue(Whistler beginning in fl' Streets Street to Tippitt Street) 5.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 30.00 - 21.00 + 2015. Project funded by Gas Tax and Citizen Request:Sidewalks Stormwater (92nd Avenue from Durham Funds.Qualifies Streets Road to Gook park) 5-00 4.00 0.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 35.00 - 20.00 of for MSTfP. 135th Avenue/Walnut Street Intersection Lack of available Streets Improvement 3.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 28.00 - 20.00 ++ funding. Upper Boones Ferry Road/ Durham Road Adaptive Lack of available Streets Signal Coordination System 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 28 010 - 1900. ` funding. Commercial Street Sidewalk (Lincoln Street to Alain Lack of avaiiabPc Streets Street) 4.00 3.00 O.GJ 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.OG 5.00 4.00 29.00 - 87.00 funding. 72nd Avenue Improvements (Hwy 217 to Dartmouth Lack of available Streets Street) 4.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 7.8.00 - 14.00 ++ funding. Hall Boulevard/McDonald Street Intersection Lack of available Streets Improvements 3.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 28 00 14.00 ++ un&ng. Citizen Request:Sidewalks (Holl Boulevord from Bonito !.ack of available Streets Road to McDonald Street) 4.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 27.00 - 11.00 ++ funding. Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Street Lack of available Streets Realignment 4.00 3.00 6.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 24.00 - 14.00 ++ funding. Walnut Street(riedemon Lack of available Streets Avenue to pacific Hwy) 3.00 2.00 u.0.] 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 24.00 - 1100 + funding. Tiedeman Avenue/North Dakota Street/Tigard Street Lack of available Streets Realignment 4.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 25.00 - 900 ++ funding. Ash Street Crossing of the Lack of available Streets WES Rail Line 2.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 25.00 - 6.00 ++ funding. Citizen Request:Sidewalks (Park Street from pacific Lack of ay.:ilable Streets Hwy to Watkins Avenue) 3,00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 19.00 000 ik funding. 2013-2017 Capital ImprovemcntPlar 1 83 Final Scores r � II m 1= Y u I = m « v t a c ai rp C U C s « M a a m C 4f IIC } S IQ d OD 9C pCC E 3: E E F M a E System Project Namea' w .� } Q U U vy v M ~ Comments Citizen Request: Street Improvements tack of uvailabie Streets (WornerStreetJ 2.00 2.!'10 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.40 2.00 2.00 15.00 - 000 r funding. Citizen Request:Sidewalks (Watkins Avenue from Pacific Hwy to Walnut Lab.of available Streets Street) 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.C) 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 14.00 - 0.00 r i funding. Fanno Creek Trail- Bridge Replacement Lack of available Parks (CWS Re-meander) 4.00 4.00 4.00 1 4.00 3.00 4.00 3-OC 3 00 4-00 33 00 - - r funding. Project furdcd by Parks Tigard Street Trail 3.00 3.00 3,00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 26 00 - - + Parks Band, Bonneville Power Trail Lack of available Parks (Westside Trial) 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 5.00 2700 - - : +r funding. Fanno Creek Trail (Woodard Park to Grant Lack of available Parks StreetJ 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 0.00 5.00 2?00 - + funding Lack of available Parks Tigard Triangle Area(P3) 3 OD 3.00 300 3-00 3.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 2600 r e fundirg. Lack of avallabit Parks Brown Property Trail 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 2600 - funding. Woodard Park-Parking at Lack of ay.0Able Parks end of Katherine Street 4.00 3.00 3 O 2.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2600 - - funding Lack of available Parks Senn Park 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 4,00 1.00 0.00 4.00 21.00 - - w funding. Pacific Highway at Hall Lack o;available Parks Boulevard Gateway 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 25 00 - - r funding. Citizen Request: Two Multi-purpose Turf Sports Fields at Lack of available Parks Community Parks 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 2300 -- - +r funding. Citizens Request. Lack of availaule Parks Downtown Clock Tower 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1200 - + funding. City Hall/Permit Center/ Project funded by Facilities Police Exterior Walls 3,00 4.00 4.00 2 00 3.00 2.00 3.OD 4.OD 4.00 2900 - +r General Fund. New Public Works Yard/ Decommission Ash Lack of available Facilities Street Yard 2.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3d10 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.60 2800 - = of fundirg. Project funded by General Capital Facilities Facilities City}call Roof Repair 3.00 3 D 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.CJ 3_C9 3.00 4.00 25.00 - - ++ Fund. 84 1 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Plan c j v 91 C d � 1+ _ r➢ Final Scores(continued...) 4 R M C C M a v t a c3 a oa m IV aWO u m m E E lEm 0"C CD U System Project Name n' w u v u a r~ Comments Project funded by Water RevenueBords. E�,Pected Lake Oswego/Tigard Water to be online by Water Partnership Improvements 3.00 3.00 4.00 S.On 4.00 5.00 3 u 2.00 4.00 3i OF ++ FY 2015. Project funded Pipeline Connecting SSOG by Water CIP Water Zone to 530 Zone 3.00 3.00 14.00 3.Ou 2 00 2.0 300 5.00 4.00 2900 -- r r Fund. Annual Fire Flow Project begins in Water Improvement Program 3 00 2.0,, 4.00 2.0;, 2.00 2.00 3-00 3.00 4.00 2500 - +r FY 2013. Tigard High School Project begins in Water Water Well Abandonment 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2500 - ++ FY 2015. Slope Stabilization Project funded (Derry Def;Creek at 118th by Stormwater Storm Avenue) 3.00 3.00 3,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.0C 2.00 23.00 - - ++ Fund. Storm Drain Extension Project funded at 11445 SW Tiedeman by Stormwater Storm Avenue 3.G0 3 U0 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 23 00 - - ++ Fund. Storm Drain Upgrade: Canterbury(106th Avenue Lack of available Storm to Pacific Hwy) 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3-00 2.00 2.00 21.00 - ++ funding. Burlcrest Drive(Summer Lack of available Storm Crest to 121st Avenue) ?.00 3.00 3 00 2.60 2.00 2 00 3.00 2-00 2.00 2100 - ++ funding. 772ndvenue Sewer Project Sanitaryement scheduled to Sewer ita Road) 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3-00 4-00 27.00 -- ++ begin FY 2016. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Plan I 85