02/09/2011 - Packet Completeness Review
° for Boards, Commissions
and Committee Records
CITY OF TIGARD
City Center Advisory Commission
Name of Board, Commission or Committee
February 9, 2011
Date of Fleeting
I have verified that to the best of my knowledge, these documents are a complete copy of
the official record. I was not the original administrator for this meeting.
S W . Com. ea V-►ne.
Print Name
Signature
Date
City of Tigard
r
r .
City Center Advisory Commission Agenda
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, February 9, 2011 — 6:30-8:45 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Red Rock Creek Conference Room
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
1. Welcome and Introductions...................................................................................................... 6:30—6:35
2. Review / Approve January Minutes........................................................................................6:35 — 6:40
3. Main Street Green Street..........................................................................................................6:40— 7:40
o Keport from January parking discussion meetings (Sean Farrelly)
o Parking issue review(Consultant Rick Williams)
o Review of alternative concepts and pr ject schedule (Kim McMillan, Consultant Gary Alfson)
o Action item: Recommend preferred alternative to Councill CCDA
4. CCAC 2011 Goals......................................................................................................................7:40 — 8:00
Action item:Finalise draftgoals from CCAC Retreat
(Chair Murphy and Vice-Chair Shearer)
5. Joint CCAC/CCDA Meeting Planning.................................................................................8:00 — 8:10
Preparation for February 151h meeting
(Chair Murphy and Vice-Chair Shearer)
6. CCAC Priorities for FY 2011-12 CCDA Budget..................................................................8:10 — 8:25
CCAC to discuss and recommend budget priorities for City Center Development Agency budget and CIP
(Sean Farrelly)
7. Downtown Marketing Strategy................................................................................................ 8:25 — 8:35
Report from Downtown Strategy meeting and upcoming schedule
(Sean Farrelly, Commissioners Louw and Thornburg)
8. Downtown Open/Public Space ............................................................................................. 8:35 — 8:40
Discuss options
(Sean Farrelly)
9. Other Business............................................................................................................................. 8:40 — 8:45
10. Adjourn....................................................................................................................................... 8:45 p.m.
CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— February 9, 2011
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 oft
Upcoming meetings of note:
2/15,Joint CCDA-CCAC Meeting, 6:30 PM
2/22,Downtown Marketing Strategy, Fundamentals of Revitalization Presentation, 4:00-5:00 PM, Tigard Area
Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main
2/22, CCDA Study Session on Hall/Pacific Hwy Gateway, 6:30 PM
2/28, Community Economic Development Presentation, Planning Commission,Town Hall, 7:00 PM
3/2, HCT CAC,Tigard Public Library, 2nd Floor, 6:30-8:30 PM
3/9, CCAC Regular Meeting, 6:30-8:30 PM, Red Rock Creek Conference Room
3/29,Downtown Marketing Strategy,Analysis and Recommendations Presentation, 4:00-5:00 PM,Tigard Area
Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main
4/13, CCAC Regular Meeting, , 6:30-8:30 PM, Red Rock Creek Conference Room
4/20,Downtown Marketing Field Trip to North Mississippi Ave. 11:00 AM-1:30 PM
CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— February 9, 2011
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 oft
City of Tigard
Memorandum
To: Thomas Murphy, Chair, City Center Advisory Commission
From: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager
Re: Agenda Material
Date: February 1, 2011
Here is a brief description of some of the packet material for February's meeting.
Agenda Item #3: Main Street Green Street
At the February 9th meeting, the CCAC will be requested to recommend a preferred
alternative to the Council/CCDA. The two options are
A. 45 Degree Angle and Parallel Parking
B. Dual Parallel Parking Option
Please see the comparison chart for details.
Staff has met a total of four times with a Downtown stakeholder group, made up mainly of
Downtown business owners. This group has expressed a strong preference for the 45
Degree Angle and Parallel Parking because it results in fewer lost parking spaces and
preserves angled parking which is preferred by their customers.
The CCAC's recommendation will be presented to Council/CCDA at the workshop on
February 15, right after the joint CCAC/CCDA meeting.
As the project moves forward, the CCAC will be updated on the street design at regular
intervals (30% complete, 60%, 90%). An Open House will also be held when the 30%
complete design plans are prepared.
Agenda Item #6: CCAC Priorities for FY 2011-12 CCDA Budget
There are several unknowns regarding the FY 2011-12 CCDA operating and capital
investment budget and the amount of resources available for the coming fiscal year. For
example, it may be possible to obtain private financial institutions to fund major projects and
activities. However, this depends on available increment revenues and policy decisions by
the CCDA. Alternately, the CCDA may continue to borrow against the City's general fund.
The increment for FY 2010-11 is projected to be $339,000.
At the February meeting, the CCAC will be asked to indicate their priorities for the CCDA
budget. These priorities will inform the budget proposal that will be submitted by the
Executive Director of the CCDA (the City Manager). Further recommendations for the
CCDA budget can be made at the CCDA Budget Committee meetings which will occur in
April and May.
It is important to note that the up to $1.7 million that may be available for Downtown
public/open space is a separate potential funding source from this budget.
Proposed CCDA Projects/Programs for FY 2011-12
• Main Street Green Street streetscape enhancements
• Burnham Street public parking lot
• Parking management support
• Gateway projects (Hall/99W, Main Street: north and south)
• Facade Improvement Program
• Development opportunity studies
• Downtown marketing implementation
• Developer incentives/ redevelopment property purchase
• Downtown wayfinding implementation
2
q City Center Advisory Commission
Meeting Minutes
TIGARD
Date of Meeting. February 9, 2011
Location: Red Rock Creek Conference Room
Called to order by: Chair Thomas Murphy
Time Started: 6:30 p.m.
Time Ended: 9:30 p.m.
Commissioners Present: Carolyn Barkley;Alexander Craghead;Alice Ellis Gaut (arrived late);
Ralph Hughes (arrived late); Peter Louw; Chair Thomas Murphy; Linh Pao; Vice Chair Elise
Shearer; Philip Thornburg
Commissioners Absent:
Others Present: Gary Alfson, consultant; Councilor Marland Henderson; Rick Williams, parking
consultant; :Margaret Ellenson; Steve Mayberry; Darby Mayberry; George Kadey;Tim McGilford
Staff Present: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager; Kim McMillan, Engineering
Manager;Jerree Lewis, Executive Assistant
AGENDA ITEM #1: Welcome and Introductions
Introductions were made.
AGENDA ITEM #2: Approve Minutes
Vice Chair Shearer noted a grammatical error on page 2; the secretary will correct the minutes.
Motion from Commissioner Louw, seconded by Commissioner Thornburg, to accept the January,
2011 minutes with the correction. The motion passed unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM #3: Main Street Green Street
Sean Farrelly recapped the Main Street parking discussion group meetings and advised that the
group had a strong preference for Concept A (a combination of 45°angled and parallel parking
spaces). He also noted that parking consultant Rick Williams reviewed the parking issues on Main
Street and stated that either concept would work for the Downtown, but recommends we start to
consider a parking management plan.
CCAC Meeting Minutes for February 9,2011 Page 1 of 5
Rick Williams talked with to the Commissioners about parking issues and the need to start thinking
about how to manage parking in the Downtown (PowerPoint presentation, Exhibit A).
Kim McMillan advised that the new Burnham parking lot will have handicap spaces. Gary Alfson,
consultant with Harper Houf Peterson Righellis, noted that both parking options include a 3'wide
planter strip along the curb for linear stormwater treatment/filtration. The City will decide what
color to paint the hydrants; existing hydrants will have to be moved if they conflict with parking
spaces or are in the middle of the sidewalk. Hydrants will be on both sides of the street.
The location of the crosswalk by Fanno Creek Park was discussed. Currently, the plan is to locate it
just east of the bridge; however, the final location is still under consideration. Bicyclists may have
to ride on a portion of the sidewalk to cross from the park to go under the highway.
Gary Alfson provided copies of the updated project schedule (Exhibit B).
Commissionerquestions / comments
• Will the addition of the waterline extend construction time for the project? The project will
most likely be done in phases, which will draw out the construction time. The CC 4C will be advised once
the construction dates are closer to being determined. It may be possible to do some of the work at night.
• It would be nice to have a plan showing where the 8' sidewalks and the 12' sidewalks would
be located. Kim will ask her staff to put something together.
Public comment
• Darby Mayberry said she prefers the angled parking.
• George Kadey asked where the trees will be placed. Gary Alfson said street trees will added
as a part of the detail plan. Also, the trees will be placed where they will not block doors or
windows.
• Mr. Kadey would like to have driveway access to the back of his property, but if not, he
wonders if planks could be put across the curbing. Kim McMillan advised that access was
removed in 1992 when we did a Main Street project at that time. She doesn't know if there's
a mechanism for temporary access.
• Mr. Kadey prefers the parallel parking.
• Margaret Ellenson reported that she favors the diagonal parking. She also said she does not
have an issue with asking her employees to not park on Main Street.
• Tim McGilford discussed the portal into Downtown Tigard via the Fanno Creek trail. He
would like an inviting atmosphere coming into the Downtown. With regard to bicycle
parking on Main Street, he likes the idea of bicycle corrals (replacing 1 parking space with 20
bicycle spaces).
Motion by Vice Chair Shearer, seconded by Commissioner Craghead, that the CCAC approve the
angled parking concept because it answers the business needs for parking, as well as increasing the
CCAC Meeting Minutes for February 9,2011 Page 2 of 5
stormwater treatment and meeting our requirements [the motion also includes building in a parking
management plan, as was suggested by Rick Williams]. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Thornburg noted that during the construction phase of the project, we need to make
sure there is parking available. Commissioner Louw asked for consideration for the restaurants on
Main Street that may be affected by evening street closures. He believes a 7:00 p.m. closure is too
early.
AGENDA ITEM #4: CCAC 2011 Goals
The Commissioners wordsmithed their draft 2011 goals. Vice Chair Shearer made the revisions as
suggested by the Commissioners (the proposed goals are attached as Exhibit C). These goals will
be discussed with the CCDA at the joint meeting on February 151h and the Commissioners will
formally adopt them at the March CCAC meeting.
AGENDA ITEM #5: Joint CCAC/CCDA Meeting Planning
The Commissioners decided to follow this format for their joint meeting with the CCDA on
February 15th:
• Commissioner Craghead will invite questions on the 2010 annual report.
• Chair Murphy will lead discussion on the 2011 CCAC goals, highlighting things that are on
our list, but are not specifically on Council's list.
• Commissioner Louw will talk about the Ash Ave. at-grade crossing.
• Commissioner Thornburg will discuss Michelle Reeves'presentation.
• Commissioner Ellis Gaut (with Commissioner Craghead as back-up) will discuss the Parks
Bond money.
• Commissioner Louw will lead discussion about developer incentives (the incentives matrix,
what the CCAC is considering, why development is one of the 2011 goals).
AGENDA ITEM #6: CCAC Priorities for FY 2011-12 CCDA Budget
The Commissioners discussed the City Center Development Agency proposed projects and
programs (Exhibit D) and prioritized the list as follows:
1. Burnham Street public parking lot
2. Parking management support, coupled with Downtown wayfinding implementation
3. Gateway projects (Hall/99W, Main Street north and south)
4. Facade Improvement Program
CCAC Meeting Minutes for February 9,2011 Page 3 of 5
The remaining projects will be paid from the contingency fund:
• Development opportunity studies
• Downtown marketing implementation
• Developer incentives/redevelopment property purchase
AGENDA ITEM #7: Downtown Marketing Strategy
Sean handed out copies of the newest newsletter from consultant Michele Reeves (Exhibit E). It
outlines the next steps of the program: revitalization presentation on February 22nd; analysis and
recommendations presentation on March 29th; and field trip on April 201h. The field trip will be to
North Mississippi Ave. Vice Chair Shearer suggested trying to arrange a meeting with the developer
who built the condos on Mississippi.
Commissioner Thornburg said something that stood out to him from the kick off meeting was the
importance of bringing in people to see the Downtown. One way to do that could be to hold
events in some sort of open space/plaza close to the heart of the Downtown.
Commissioner Louw noted that Michele stressed bringing in landlords and others who will be
affected to deal with the internal structure before going external. Also, we need a marketing or
business manager and a Main Street organization to promote the Downtown.
Councilor Henderson said Michele's plan is to start at the grassroots and identify Tigard's "story,"
because that's what binds us all together. She has asked us to identify who the stakeholders might
be.
AGENDA ITEM #8: Downtown Open/Public Space
Sean advised that the CCDA is willing to consider other options for the plaza site. They will work
with the CCAC to develop criteria to identify,4 or 5 sites.
At the last meeting, the Commission asked if we could use the park bond money to buy an option
for a piece of property. Sean advised that it's possible to use the $1.7 million to buy an option, but
it's not recommended. The information came from the City's bond counsel—he will forward the
information to the Commissioners.
AGENDA ITEM #9: Other Business
CCAC Meeting Minutes for February 9,2011 Page 4 of 5
Vice Chair Shearer advised that we need a representative for the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board (DRAB). Chair Murphy asked for anyone willing to be a co-liaison to the PRAB to please let
him know.
Commissioner Pao commented that City of Tualatin pocket parks are all maintained by local
Friends of Trees sub-groups or by groups such as Boy Scout/Girl Scout troops. She has an
acquaintance who is involved in this effort and is willing to meet with anyone interested in hearing
more about group maintenance of pocket parks. Commissioner Pao also noted that, as a non-profit
organization, Friends of Trees can get donations from nurseries and provide different types of
native shrubberies for projects. This might be something to consider for our Hall/99W gateway.
Commissioner Hughes noted that Michele Reeves' job is scheduled to take 6 months. He would
like to make sure we plug a placeholder into the budget to carry on the project into the next fiscal
year. Sean advised that the Downtown Marketing Implementation is his placeholder. The
Commission wants to make sure we keep this on the agenda.
AGENDA ITEM #10: Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
erree Lewis, CCAC Secretary
--------�
ATTEST: 00� UN
Chair Thomas M by
CCCAC Meeting Minutes for February 9,2011 Page 5 of
l � liil � l
\ t M1
Tigard 0 g
Main Street Parking
1 , V I. I•'M. Dual Panallel Pa
February 9 , 2011
Y.N• r1 I/r.Irlb: �.4.I.I wVi iVr'I s1'�.I
Irl )~ ry.IY.. qn1'. r.4• %/ •rlf' .�
4f
\ t .
It;'4., <.N.�MC'r;41'rM�.f, '7 4�.1.I.rL•w Ml'L'.N. . Itl'M.
�Sp flt._�f-\,-���\�.� �� rM. •.w:l ti. •v. I♦Mlv�+.�T`r-TYi=_Y.Nrr
1111 �f�
The Benefits of on-street Parking
Management
1 . Getting the right people to park in the right place
2. Preserves parking for users of the district (residents, employees,
visitors/customers) and reduces/eliminates parking for those who would
use the district as a "park & ride."
3. More efficient use of a limited resource
4. Creates order and certainty — reduces angst
5. Maximizes turnover, where turnover is needed — increased vehicle
volume of customers to retail curb space, resulting in increased retail
sales.
6. A means to support mode goals for transit, biking and walking
(coordinating "capacity" strategically)
7. If there is a plan, it can react, calibrate and adapt to change.
Consulting
I
'v
Go
►AlWO
� CMM
LEGEND ,fo
.•n4w\. 5..'JhNwf
DUAL PARALLEL PARKING PLAN
GREEN STREET CONCEPT
•
CreatingChange
Main Street is Unique
✓ Support a "messy vitality' - vital, active and interesting urbanizing
environment
✓ Convenient parking for visitors and customers
✓ Reasonable and safe parking for employees and long-term visits
✓ A clear sense of movement to parking options
✓ Integrated system on and off-street (parking & pedestrians)
✓ Ensure that parking in district is for users of the district — mitigate park &
ride
Parking management must be tailored to the
unique qualities and needs of the district.
Rule of Thumb # 1
One parking space can be more than one car
v' Physical Capacity =
built supply
08/11r.stay v' Functional Capacity
_ = managed supply
I 2/hr. stay
- ✓ Managing
Turnover
maximizes access
100 stalls — balances needs
City Rate of Turnover % violations
Beaverton, OR 4.20 14.8%
C
0
441 Everett, WA 5.12 18.5%
.5 Hillsboro, OR 4.90 10.0%
0
a; Lake Oswego, OR 4.20 13.5%
M
t Oregon City, OR 4.60 12.5%
op
s Redmond, WA 3.23 31.0%
3 Springfield, OR 2.87 24.3%
v
Vancouver,WA 5.60 18.7%
Average Turnover- >9% rate of via la tion 4.34 17.9%
Bend, OR 7.69 5.9%
o Hood River, OR 6.06 6.9%
o Kirkland, WA 8.60 5.1%
0Milwaukie, OR 6.00 6.2%
a
o Olympia, WA 7.40 < 6.0%
L
o Portland, OR 7.69 4.5%
3 Salem, OR 7.52 4.1%
N
d
Spokane, WA 6.36 <7.0%
Ventura, CA 6.46 8.0%
Average Turnover- <9% rate of violation 7.08 5.96%
Average trip capacity difference 2.74 turns per day per stall... or
274 new trips per 100 stalls
Rule of Thumb # 2
Use Parking Management Best Practices
✓ Strategy complements policy & priorities - create a
framework for decision making
— Provide for efficient use of on-street parking
— Encourage turnover of on-street parking � `
— Focus short-term parking nearest to businesses i
— Standard time stays - messaging I �
NrWwN9��
— Identify long-term locations -- ��*•.
— Use the 85% Rule
— Enforcement
Rule of Thumb # 3
On-street parkingis a finite su I supply
✓ At some point, demand will exceed capacity functional
capacity
✓ Must determine in advance for whom the on-street supply is
prioritized
— Allows for decision-making and more aggressive
management when conflicts between different users
occur (i.e. , employee/customer
— Validates off-street strategies &PAR
00
tPublic
Parking
Consulting
Rule of Thumb # 4
Ifyourgemployee isn 't walkin , your customer is
SMART w
✓ Main Street requires on-street parking dedicated to P A R K
customer use. ° A H •A ° f
✓ Employee locations need to be off-street and r
"proximate" _
— Safe and secure
'r7
— Well lit 1 REE PARKING
— Quality landscaping and connectivity
— Wayfinding from right of way to site
— Unified "brand"
Consulting
Rule of Thumb #5
"Capacity" is not all aboutarkin
p g
✓ Relationship of TDM to Parking vat UWnimp
• Mode split goals and targets (auto,
transit, bike, walk, ride share)
• Understanding relationSNArtle"cu"
ship between MUM rOGOVO"
parking and other modes (i.e. Pjn AM,
efficiency, capacity, and cost)
11as 11ccessorl" You mean
an
Can gett all ttia
• Timing and support for TDM across aOneacin w place?
`demand horizon' managing parking Mconnemuter
and access capacity
ction
Parking should be seen as a management tool that supports specific
economic uses
What Others are Doing
Gresham y
Z► 4 ; r
✓ Customer First Program �
7A ---Aw"_
✓ Shared use agreements — private lots
✓ Standardized time stays
✓ Common branding -
GRESHAM
Consulting
The Benefits of on-street Parking
Management
1 . Getting the right people to park in the right place
2. Preserves parking for users of the district (residents, employees,
visitors/customers) and reduces/eliminates parking for those who would
use the district as a "park & ride."
3. More efficient use of a limited resource
4. Creates order and certainty — reduces angst
5. Maximizes turnover, where turnover is needed — increased vehicle
volume of customers to retail curb space, resulting in increased retail
sales.
6. A means to support mode goals for transit, biking and walking
(coordinating "capacity" strategically)
7. If there is a plan, it can react, calibrate and adapt to change.
Consulting
I
'v
Go
►AlWO
� CMM
LEGEND ,fo
.•n4w\. 5..'JhNwf
DUAL PARALLEL PARKING PLAN
GREEN STREET CONCEPT
•
CreatingChange
Main Street is Unique
✓ Support a "messy vitality' - vital, active and interesting urbanizing
environment
✓ Convenient parking for visitors and customers
✓ Reasonable and safe parking for employees and long-term visits
✓ A clear sense of movement to parking options
✓ Integrated system on and off-street (parking & pedestrians)
✓ Ensure that parking in district is for users of the district — mitigate park &
ride
Parking management must be tailored to the
unique qualities and needs of the district.
Rule of Thumb # 1
One parking space can be more than one car
v' Physical Capacity =
built supply
08/11r.stay v' Functional Capacity
_ = managed supply
I 2/hr. stay
- ✓ Managing
Turnover
maximizes access
100 stalls — balances needs
City Rate of Turnover % violations
Beaverton, OR 4.20 14.8%
C
0
441 Everett, WA 5.12 18.5%
.5 Hillsboro, OR 4.90 10.0%
0
a; Lake Oswego, OR 4.20 13.5%
M
t Oregon City, OR 4.60 12.5%
op
s Redmond, WA 3.23 31.0%
3 Springfield, OR 2.87 24.3%
v
Vancouver,WA 5.60 18.7%
Average Turnover- >9% rate of via la tion 4.34 17.9%
Bend, OR 7.69 5.9%
o Hood River, OR 6.06 6.9%
o Kirkland, WA 8.60 5.1%
0Milwaukie, OR 6.00 6.2%
a
o Olympia, WA 7.40 < 6.0%
L
o Portland, OR 7.69 4.5%
3 Salem, OR 7.52 4.1%
N
d
Spokane, WA 6.36 <7.0%
Ventura, CA 6.46 8.0%
Average Turnover- <9% rate of violation 7.08 5.96%
Average trip capacity difference 2.74 turns per day per stall... or
274 new trips per 100 stalls
Rule of Thumb # 2
Use Parking Management Best Practices
✓ Strategy complements policy & priorities - create a
framework for decision making
— Provide for efficient use of on-street parking
— Encourage turnover of on-street parking � `
— Focus short-term parking nearest to businesses i
— Standard time stays - messaging I �
NrWwN9��
— Identify long-term locations -- ��*•.
— Use the 85% Rule
— Enforcement
Rule of Thumb # 3
On-street parkingis a finite su I supply
✓ At some point, demand will exceed capacity functional
capacity
✓ Must determine in advance for whom the on-street supply is
prioritized
— Allows for decision-making and more aggressive
management when conflicts between different users
occur (i.e. , employee/customer
— Validates off-street strategies &PAR
00
tPublic
Parking
Consulting
Rule of Thumb # 4
Ifyourgemployee isn 't walkin , your customer is
SMART w
✓ Main Street requires on-street parking dedicated to P A R K
customer use. ° A H •A ° f
✓ Employee locations need to be off-street and r
"proximate" _
— Safe and secure
'r7
— Well lit 1 REE PARKING
— Quality landscaping and connectivity
— Wayfinding from right of way to site
— Unified "brand"
Consulting
Rule of Thumb #5
"Capacity" is not all aboutarkin
p g
✓ Relationship of TDM to Parking vat UWnimp
• Mode split goals and targets (auto,
transit, bike, walk, ride share)
• Understanding relationSNArtle"cu"
ship between MUM rOGOVO"
parking and other modes (i.e. Pjn AM,
efficiency, capacity, and cost)
11as 11ccessorl" You mean
an
Can gett all ttia
• Timing and support for TDM across aOneacin w place?
`demand horizon' managing parking Mconnemuter
and access capacity
ction
Parking should be seen as a management tool that supports specific
economic uses
What Others are Doing
Gresham y
Z► 4 ; r
✓ Customer First Program �
7A ---Aw"_
✓ Shared use agreements — private lots
✓ Standardized time stays
✓ Common branding -
GRESHAM
Consulting
What Others are Doing
Milwaukie
✓ Employee permit program
■ On-street (in periphery)
■ Off-street (public lots)
■ Permits registered by work site
✓ Standardized on-street time stays (2 HR)
Consulting
What Others are Doing
Milwaukie
✓ Employee permit program
■ On-street (in periphery)
■ Off-street (public lots)
■ Permits registered by work site
✓ Standardized on-street time stays (2 HR)
Consulting
What Others are Doing
Lake Oswego & Springfield
✓
Zone A & Zone B `... _�
■ 2 Hour only in A
■ 3 Hour or by Permit in B
■ Permits registered by work site
(onna e✓ Standardized sig g
and off-street)
✓ Routine usage/occupancy
counts
Consulting
SUMMARY
Principles for Success
✓ Clarify
✓ Organize
✓ Enhance
Consulting
z A
City of Tigard Main Street- GreenStreet
www.tigard-or.gov/inainstreet
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer
2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012
CCAC Meetings ,;, ,v/ ✓✓✓ V/
Business Owner Meetings ✓v V-
Open Houses ✓ ✓
Parking Discussion Group ✓✓✓
Environmental Reports ✓ ✓ NEM
Parking Analysis �� ✓
Right—of—Way
Preliminary Design A LT 30 % 60 %
Final Design 90 %/F ,l N A L
Construction
Harper
` HP Houf Peterson
Righellis Inc.
Proposed CCAC 2011 Goals
I. Project Infrastructure
a. Oversee, review and provide input including the following key projects:
i. Main Street/Green Street Phase 1
ii. Open Space/Downtown Park/Plaza Site
iii. Burnham Street Completion
iv. 99W/Hall Gateway
v. Lower Fanno Creek
vi. Transit Center Revitalization
vii. Tigard Street Trail Pedestrian/Bike Boulevard
viii. Full Utilization of WES Park & Ride
II. Economic Development
a. Work with Metro consultant to develop marketing plan for downtown
i. Engage neighborhoods, business owners, property owners, potential tenants and
developers within the consultant process
b. Advocate for implementation of approved plan
III. Development
a. Promote downtown Tigard
i. Outreach to developers/Solicit businesses
ii. Land assembly and direct development options
b. Advise CCDA on possible incentives.
c. Improve our knowledge of the downtown businesses and customer base using census
information, cultural demographics, trends, and other statistics
IV. Fa4ade Improvement Plan
a. Continue to promote and expand program
i. Consider expanding program onto streets in addition to Main
ii. Pursue endorsements from participants
iii. Develop evaluation metrics that are qualitative and quantitative
V. Circulation Plan
a. Review recommendation before final adoption
b. Engage in regular communication with HCTCAC to ensure HCT transportation plan meets needs
and values of downtown and the greater community
c. Continue discussing about the "Heart" of downtown
d. Keep focus on RR crossing at Ash Avenue and opening to WES park and ride
VI. Communication
a. Liaise with PRAB, HCTCAC and other boards
b. Engage in on-going communication with Council and Staff
i. Attendance as warranted at council and CCDA meetings
ii. Representation at downtown project meetings
c. Engage in on-going communication with hired consultants
d. Engage in on-going communication with citizens of Tigard
e. Publish a Five-Year Report of accomplishments
f. Begin a long-range plan to cover the 5, 10 and 15 years left in the URD
VII. Ongoing Processes
a. Continually improve CCAC procedures including, but not limited to:
i. Annual Calendar Development
ii. Continue to evolve meeting efficiency and agendas
b. Increase awareness of the impact our work has on the community
i. Continually work to increase transparency with citizens
ii. Establish a quarterly financial report of Urban Renewal Funds
c. Perform other duties as assigned by CCDA
q;
City of Tigard
9
Memorandum
To: Thomas Murphy, Chair, City Center Advisory Commission
From: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager
Re: Agenda Material
Date: February 1, 2011
Here is a brief description of some of the packet material for February's meeting.
Agenda Item #3: Main Street Green Street
At the February 9,h meeting, the CCAC will be requested to recommend a preferred
alternative to the Council/CCDA. The two options are
A. 45 Degree Angle and Parallel Parking
B. Dual Parallel Parking Option
Please see the comparison chart for details.
Staff has met a total of four times with a Downtown stakeholder group, made up mainly of
Downtown business owners. This group has expressed a strong preference for the 45
Degree Angle and Parallel Parking because it results in fewer lost parking spaces and
preserves angled parking which is preferred by their customers.
The CCAC's recommendation will be presented to Council/CCDA at the workshop on
February 15, right after the joint CCAC/CCDA meeting.
As the project moves forward, the CCAC will be updated on the street design at regular
intervals (30% complete, 60%, 90%). An Open House will also be held when the 30%
complete design plans are prepared.
Agenda Item #6: CCAC Priorities for FY 2011-12 CCDA Budget
There are several unknowns regarding the FY 2011-12 CCD-1 operating and capital
investment budget and the amount of resources available for the coming fiscal year. For
example, it may be possible to obtain private financial institutions to fund major projects and
activities. However, this depends on available increment revenues and policy decisions by
the CCDA. Alternately, the CCDA may continue to borrow against the City's general fund.
The increment for FY 2010-11 is projected to be $339,000.
At the February meeting, the CCAC will be asked to indicate their priorities for the CCDA
budget. These priorities will inform the budget proposal that will be submitted by the
Executive Director of the CCDA (the City Manager). Further recommendations for the
CCDA budget can be made at the CCDA Budget Committee meetings which will occur in
April and May.
It is important to note that the up to $1.7 million that may be available for Downtown
public/open space is a separate potential funding source from this budget.
Proposed CCDA Projects/Programs for FY 2011-12
• Main Street Green Street streetscape enhancements
• Burnham Street public parking lot
• Parking management support
• Gateway projects (Hall/99W, Main Street: north and south)
• Fa§ade Improvement Program
• Development opportunity studies
• Downtown marketing implementation
• Developer incentives/ redevelopment property purchase
• Downtown wayfinding implementation
2
, XA ;4
Revtalizatlon Ne\/\/s
Tools You Can Use—Downtown Tigard Renewal Who Is Michele Reeves?
Join us for these hands-on. Hear the story, directly fromn Ichele Reeves is an urban
practical courses created for developers and businesses, of ' v 'strategist with well over a
property owners, business own- how this commercial corridor decade of experience in retail
ers, and any downtown stake- with a high crime rate and a mix leasing, development consulting,
holders who want to see im- of buildings (warehouses, single and project management.
provement in downtown Tigard. family homes, low income hous- In her consulting practice,
1. Fundamentals of Revi- ing, and mixed-use buildings) she helps cities renew their urban
talization Presentation.Febru- became a hot retail node. places by teaching them how to
ary 22nd, 4 pm to 5 pm, Tigard For more information on I cesstake the building blocks for suc-
Area Chamber of Commerce. these upcoming events, please hem to
revitalization and apply
t
A market-based crash contact Sean Farrelly, city of them to a specific commercial
course on revitalization sup- Tigard, Redevelopment Project district. Working together with
ported by real-world examples Manager at 503.718.2420 or stakeholders, she assists them
and experience. Learn about the sean@tigard-or.gov. Or, please in developing a detailed and
basics of district renewal, how contact Michele directly. achievable plan for revival.
commercial areas improve, and This program is presented Her approach d, prarevctical,specific types of tenants that by the city of Tigard in conjunc- tion is market-based, practical,
help downtowns develop. tion with Metro. and rooted in extensive private-
2. Analysis and Recom- sector experience. She stresses
mendations Presentation. Downtown Can Be Stunning! solutions for resuscitating retail
March 29th, 4 pm to 5 pm, districts that can be implemented
Tigard Area Chamber of Com- in small, tangible steps.
merce. Michele is looking forward to
By applying the fundamen- i•. meeting you, and working with
tals to downtown Tigard, we can you, in downtown Tigard!
identify short-term goals and
concrete next steps for all stake- MICHELE REEVES LLC
1310 NW Naito Pkwy#303 Michele
holders. Participants leave this Portland,OR 97209 Reeves
presentation with clear ideas of 503.867.8465
what they can be doing tomor-
michele@michelereeves.com
row, next month, and next year
to improve downtown Tigard. A Mall Is Managed, and a Downtown Should Be Too!
3. Field Trip.April 20th,
11:00 am to 1:30 pm. (Bus will Everyone would think it crazy to suggest running a mall without
pick up in front of Tigard City any management or organization to further the business inter-
Hall.) ests of the stores and the mall itself. A downtown is no differ-
To help us understand bet- ent; businesses and property owners need to create, join and
ter why some districts thrive, we participate in an organization that:
are going to visit one! During this
fast-paced, hands-on explora-
tion,
Plans Events Recruits Tenants
tion, we will cover "Retail 101" . Manages Press Relations • Develops District Goals
and "Redevelopment Dos and
Don'ts" as we tour the success- • Tells Downtown's Story • Coordinates Marketing
ful North Mississippi Ave corridor.
Existing conditions
TWM
i ,
- ESPRESSO� -,
' ESPRESSO C9
-,T�C--L?� � I 11 � T�' Svq�t q�• �` ROAST ;TPs1l8 � �
i i. — L1 Ti �R•�� 1 i - sues �`•.
- l :.
rr_ �
! ® R
Concept A: Angled and Parallel Parking (Conceptual Illustration)
. .
--
• — � s ~ 9 ESPRESSO io ESPRESSO i
� � ` �• �� ' TNV SDAY. -t°0 ® SOT r �
_ �� ��,;. � � •� ►� eo roA t � g ROAST TEW 6 ,UBS
r
11.
A
� 9' � ESPRESSO Cn
- , ESPRESSO U -
M _ � iHU SDAY. �'" � �Qj � � Worldwide Services
_ `�L � � - r I ij vo e41 t d �' RQAST STEW 8 +•+-�1••••�••,•••••,••
r
Hwy 99W
C
-T_ -----\--- --�-=-- 1
CREEK I I Z '
LEGEND
SIDEWALK
n LANDSCAPED PLANTER
PARKING SUMMARY
NORTH SIDE 32
I SOUTH SIDE 33
TOTAL65
w. 45°/PARALLEL PARKING PLAN
Harper
Main
Street Greets tree, HP Houf llis Inc.
rson
i:ity�i/(iv:u�d �aJ•,Street ■ Righellis inc.
GREEN STREET CONCEPT
HWY q9W
1 � \
11 °
— _
—
___
r..
T � _
ooa�
FANNO y .
CREEK � � Z
LEGEND
SIDEWALK
LANDSCAPED PLANTER PARKING SUMMARY
NORTH SIDE 27
1 SOUTH SIDE 33 �®
TOTAL 60
Harper
DUAL PARALLEL PARKING PLAN HoufP
eterson
et
Rtghelhs Inc.
i, ee ��ee � �( '
GREEN STREET CONCEPT
2011 Tigard City Council Goals
On December 30, 2010, the City Council met to set its goals for 2011. These goals represent those items that the Council
feels deserve special attention in the months ahead. The City will accomplish much more than what is listed here, but we
identify these to be of particular importance to our residents.
1. Implement Comprehensive Plan
a. Show substantial progress on new Tigard Triangle Master Plan.
b. Update Tree Code.
c. Participate in the Southwest Corridor Study.
d. Work with state and regional partners to modify the Transportation Planning Rule.
e. Work with partners on urbanization policy issues.
2. Implement Downtown and Town Center Redevelopment Opportunities
a. Develop strategy and materials to attract developers and tenants.
b. Advance Ash Avenue Railroad Crossing.
3. Complete Plans for Parkland Acquisition
4. Advance Methods of Communication
a. Communication is a part of everyone's job.
b. Support efforts to change organizational culture.
S. Continue Coordination with Lake Oswego on Water Partnership.
6. Financial Stability
a. Hold the line on the General Fund Budget.
b. Work with partners on long-range solutions to statewide structural problems.
c. Evaluate the City's internal sustainability efforts.
Five-Year Council Goals
• Obtain Ash Avenue railroad crossing in downtown
• Explore 99W Urban Renewal District
• Continue to support the Legislature in addressing the financial needs of state and
local governments in Oregon
• Develop long-term financial strategy
• Start implementing plan for City facility needs
• Develop Sustainability Plan
Long Term Goals
• Continue pursuing opportunities to reduce traffic congestion
• Continue implementing Downtown Urban Renewal Plan
• Continue to monitor the Tigard/Lake Oswego Water Partnership
Tigard City Council Long Range Objectives
• Basic city services provided to citizens are cost effective and are delivered without
interruption.
• Tigard's interests in regional and statewide issues are coordinated with appropriate
agencies and jurisdictions.
• Tigard citizens are involved in the community and participate effectively.
• Programs and activities are available in the community to meet the needs of a
diverse population.
• External and internal city assets are well managed and utilized.
CCAC 2011 Goals -DRAFT
I. Project Infrastructure
a. Oversee, review and provide input on the following key projects:
i. Main Street/Green Street Phase 1
ii. Main Street/Green Street Phase 2 (North end)
iii. Open Space/Downtown Park/Plaza Site
iv. Burnham Street Completion
v. 99W/Hall Gateway
vi. Lower Fanno Creek
vii. Transit Center Revitalization
viii. Rail to Trail Pedestrian/Bike Boulevard
ix. Full Utilization of WES Park & Ride
II. Development
a. Promote downtown Tigard
i. Outreach to developers/Solicit PDX businesses
ii. Land assembly and direct development options
b. Advise CCDA on our findings of incentive.
c. Improve our knowledge of the downtown businesses and customer base using census
information, cultural demographics, trends, and other statistics
III. Facade Improvement Plan
a. Continue to promote and expand program
i. Expand program to Burnham St.
ii. Pursue endorsements from participants
iii. Develop an evaluation matrix that is qualitative and quantitative
IV. Circulation Plan
a. Revise recommendation before final adoption
b. Engage in regular communication with TTAC to ensure HCT transportation plan meets
needs and values of downtown and the greater community
c. Dialog through finding the "Heart" of downtown
d. Keep focus on RR crossing at Ash Avenue and opening to WES park and ride lot
V. Economic Development
a. Work with Metro consultant to develop marketing plan for downtown
i. Engage neighborhoods, business owners, property owners, potential tenants and
developers within the consultant process
b. Develop a budget/position to carry plan forward after consultant
VI. Communication
a. Liaise with other PRAB and TTAC by having CCAC members at their meetings
b. Engage in on-going communication with Council and Staff
i. Attendance as warranted at council meetings
ii. Representation at downtown project meetings
iii. Council liaison at CCAC meetings
c. Engage in on-going communication with hired consultants
d. Engage in on-going communication with citizens of Tigard
e. Publish a Five-Year Report of accomplishments
f. Begin a long-range plan to cover the 5, 10 and 15 years left in the URD
VII. Ongoing Processes
a. Continually improve CCAC procedures including, but not limited to:
i. Annual Calendar Development
ii. Establish a monthly email calendar
iii. Continue to evolve meeting efficiency and agendas
b. Increase our awareness the impact our work has on community
i. Continually work to increase transparency with citizens
ii. Establish a quarterly financial report of Urban Renewal Funds
c. Perform other duties as assigned by CCDA
City of Tigard Mair Street Green Street
EXISTING EXISTING
BUILDING NEW LIGHTING BUILDING
STREET STREET
TREES TREES
CL
I
e
EXISTING 8' 16' 12' SHARED VEHICLE PARALLEL LANDSCAPE EXISTING 8'
SIDEWALK 45° ANGLE PARKING & BIKE LANES PARKING PLANTER SIDEWALK
3'
LANDSCAPE GREEN S TREE T SECTION Harper
PLANTER
450 ANGLE PARKING HP Righ RighPeterson
ellis Inc.
205 SE Spokme Str HSuit 200,5 Porcleod,OR 97202
phone:503.221.1131 www.Mpr.com f:503.221.1171
City of Tigard Mair Street Green Street
EXISTING EXISTING
BUILDING NEW LIGHTING BUILDING
STREET STREET
TREES TREES
I
I
4' 4' 7' 7 141 4
8' EXISTING SIDEWALK -ANDSCAPE PARALLEL 12' SHARED VEHICLE/BIKE LANES PARALLEL LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK 8' EXISTING
SIDEWALK EXTENSION PLANTER PARKING PARKING PLANTER EXTENSION SIDEWALK
GREEN S TREE T SECTION Harper
rson
PARALLEL PARKING HP Hohellisuf Inc.Righellis Inc.
205 SE SPokme Str HSW200,5 Porcleod,OR 9]202
Ph—.503.221.1131 www.MPr.com P:503M.1171
Main Street Green Street Concepts Comparison
Street Element Existing Concept A Concept B
Angle Parking Parallel Parkin
On-Street Parking Type Mixed Parallel and Mixed Parallel and 45 Parallel
Angle Degree Angle
On-Street Parking
Spaces 77 spaces 65 spaces (loss of 12) 60 spaces (loss of 17)
(South of RR tracks)
Off-Street Public
Parking Added N/A Approximately 20 Approximately 20
Typical Sidewalk Width 8 feet 8 feet 12 feet
Pedestrian Crossing No Change Updated Updated
Treatments
Bike Lanes None None None
Storm Water Treatment None 8,000 square feet 7,000 square feet
Area
Street Furniture No Change Updated Updated
Street Lamps No Change Updated Updated
Public Signage & No Change Updated Updated
Way-Finding