12/05/2012 - Packet n Completeness
e
Review for Boards,
Commissions and
Committee Records
CITY OF TIGARD
\ I � e'
Name of Board, Commission or Committee
Date of Meeting
I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record.
C.L. Wiley
Print Name
s nature
Date
City of Tigard
Transportation Advisory Committee Agenda
MEETING DATE/TIME: December 5, 2012, 6:30 to 8:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Library, 2nd Floor Conference Room
13500 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard
1) Call to order Steve 6:30
2) Roll Call Chris
3) Consider summary of November 7, 2012 meeting Chris
4) Visitor comments Steve
5) TTAC 2013 recruiting update Judith
6) Southwest Corridor Plan/Long Range Planning Update Judith 6:45
7) CIP Update/Project Descriptions* Carissa/Mike 7:00
8) Project Updates Mike 8:15
9) Adjourn Steve 8:30
Supporting materials/handouts
November 7 meeting summary—draft
Project ranking memorandum
Project ranking sheet (Blank)
*Project descriptions were provided at November meeting and by US Mail. Limited copies will be provided at
the meeting.
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA— December 5, 2012
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov J Page 1 of 1
TTAC Tentative Future Agenda Items
JANUARY 2013
New TTAC officer elections
Transportation funding overview
Update bylaws
FEBRUARY 2013
MARCH 2013
PARKING LOT
• Transit service improvements; coordinate w TriMet (expected 2013)
• Incremental project improvements / Funding strategies
41
Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee [TTAC] Summary
Wednesday, December 05, 2012, 6:30 PM— 8:00 PM
Library, tad Floor Conference Room, 13500 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon
MEMBERS PRESENT (7):
Karen Hughart (Vice-Chait), Basil Christopher, Dennis Mitchell,Jennifer Stanfield, Mike
Stevenson, Mark Bogert and alternate Shane Brown.
MEMBERS ABSENT (3): Steven Bass (Chair), Evelyn Murphy, Don Schmidt
STAFF PRESENT (3):
Michael McCarthy, Sr. Project Engineer; Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst; Chris
Wiley, Sr. Administrative Specialist.
1. Call to Order—Vice Chair Hughart called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.
2. Roll Call —.Chris Wiley recorded the roll. A quorum was present. Mike McCarthy
announced that Christopher Warren had emailed his regrets earlier in the day, saying he
had to resign from the TTAC due to increasing work obligations. Alternate Shane
Brown noted that he would not be able to move from an alternate to a permanent
position because of his unpredictable work schedule. Recorder's Note: As a result of
these changes, the 2013 TTAC committee will be less one permanent member and one
alternate.
3. Consider summary of November 7 2012 meeting
The meeting summary was approved.
4. Visitor Comments —Planning Commissioner Richard Shavey addressed the TTAC
members. Commissioner Shavey told the members the Planning Commission's first
choice for a Capital Improvement Project (CIP), is the Tiedeman/Greenberg/North
Dakota Intersections and realignment. He asked the TTAC members to also prioritize it
on the TTAC ratings so there will be a consensus going forward to Council. Mr. Shavey
stayed for the whole meeting.
I/Transportation Advisory Committee/2012/120512 Meeting Summary Pagel of 2
5. TTAC 2013 recruiting update
Mike McCarthy announced that Mr. George Hetu, Store Director for Tigard Fred Meyer,
will become a permanent TTAC member in January 2013. Mr. Hetu will be filling one of
the three positions on the committee that are designated for representatives who own or
have primary management responsibility for businesses in Tigard.
6. Southwest Corridor Update — Senior Transportation Planner Judith Gray was unable
to attend the meeting. An update will be presented at the January meeting.
Any time-sensitive information will be passed to the membership via e-mail.
7. CIP Update/Project Description
The majority of the meeting was focused on gathering members' ratings for
the FY 2014-16 capital improvement projects. Staff members Mike McCarthy and
Carissa Collins tallied the results. The results were reviewed and subsequent to the
meeting the published results were emailed to the TTAC members for validation. They
are shown here as Attachment 1 to the meeting summary.
8. Project Updates —Mike McCarthy said current projects are in the design phase and
the committee will hear more about them at future meetings.
9. Adjourn - The meeting was adjourned at 7:51 pm.
Chris Wiley,TTAC S>�r Mary
ATTEST: Karen Hu art, Vice Chair
UTransportation Advisory Committee/2012/120512 Meeting Summary Page 2 of 2
From Carissa Collins-for TTAC-sent via email 12/10/12
CIP Mgmt
TTAC Final
Team
SyRating Scoresstem Project Name Rating Comments
Streets Pavement Management Program 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Walnut Street Improvements (116th Ave. to Tiedeman Ave.) 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Citywide Sidewalk and Pedestrian Improvements 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Walnut Street/135th Ave. Intersection Improvement 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Pacific Hwy/Gaarde St./McDonald St Improvement 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets 72nd Ave./Dartmouth St. Intersection Improvement 0.00 0.00 It,, Progress
Streets 92nd Ave. Sidewalk(Waverly Dr. to Cook Park) 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Main St./Green St. Retrofit 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Main St./Green St. Improvements-Phase 2 0.00 0.00 In Progress
Streets Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Rd.Adaptive Signal Coordination System 31.00 45.00 38.00 Awarded$600K federal grant
Streets 121st Avenue (Walnut to Gaarde) Complete Street,Whistler to Tippitt St. 30.00 44.00 37.00
Streets Walnut Street Complete Street,Tiedeman to Pacific Hwy 29.00 31.00 30.00
Streets Citizen Request:Sidewalks-Tiedeman Ave. (Tigard St.-Greenburg Rd.) 26.00 32.00 29.00
Streets Citizen Request: Sidewalks-Hall Blvd. (Bonita Rd.to Durham Rd.) 29.00 25.00 27.00
Streets Commercial Street(Lincoln to Main)Sidewalk 29.00 23.00 26.00 Urban Renewal Project
Streets Scoffins/Hall/Hunziker Realignment 24.00 27.00 25.50 Urban Renewal Project
Streets Hall/McDonald Intersection Improvement 27.00 23.00 25.00
Streets N. Dakota St. Bridge Replacement 23.00 27.00 25.00
Streets Citizen Request:Tiedeman/Greenburg Rd./N. Dakota Intersection Improvements 28.00 17.00 22.50
Streets Citizen Request:Sidewalks(Hall Blvd. between Bonita& McDonald) 29.00 14.00 21.50
Streets 72nd Ave. Improvements (Hwy 217 to Elmhurst St.) 26.00 14.00 20.00
Streets Ash St. crossing of the WES Rail Line 26.00 8.00 17.00
Streets Tiedeman/N. Dakota/Tigard St. Realignment 25.00 2.00 13.50
Streets Citizen Request:Sidewalks(SW 72nd from Hwy 217 to Bonita Rd) 18.00 5.00 11.50
Streets Citizen Request: Bull Mtn/Benchview/139th Roundabout 13.00 0.00 6.50
Streets Citizen Request: Greenfield Dr. Complete Street 13.00 0.00 6.50
120512 TTAC Meeting Summary Attachment 1
DRAFT 2013-18 CIP Candidate Project Descriptions
72nd Ave (Hwy 217 to Elmhurst St) Widening and Sidewalks
Description: Widen 72nd Avenue to 5 lanes and construct sidewalks, bike lanes, and some landscaped
planter strips from Hwy 217 to Elmhurst St (just south of the 72nd/Dartmouth intersection). The extra
capacity would be necessary to accommodate future growth in the Tigard Triangle. Note: A 2013 project is
planned to signalize the 72nd/Dartmouth intersection, extend a five-lane section south to Elmhurst St, and
fill the sidewalk gap from Dartmouth St to the existing sidewalk north of Beveland St.
Reasons to Construct: 72nd Avenue carries a high volume and speed of traffic. This Arterial is the main
access route from the south to the Tigard Triangle. Anticipated development will add a significant amount
of traffic. Traffic congestion and poor walking and biking conditions are anticipated.
Daily Traffic Volume: 12,000 Functional Class: Arterial
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 6 Injury: 0 Ped: 0
Project Cost: $5 million Length: 1,800 feet
Other Factors: This does not include improvements to the 72nd Ave / Hwy 217 interchange, which is likely
to be a significant congestion area.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 5
i
N•'
:Y
7- -
1 e ~
34
s _
11/13/2012
72nd Ave Sidewalks (Hwy 99W to South City Limits) — Citizen Request
Description:This project would fill in the gaps and complete sidewalks along 72nd Avenue from Pacific
Hwy 99W to the southern city limits.
Reasons to Construct: 72nd Ave carries a high volume of traffic. Pieces of sidewalk exist in this section,
but neither side of the street provides a continuous connection. There are few nearby pedestrian
alternatives to this route.
Daily Traffic Volume: 17,000 Functional Class: Arterial
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 137 (65 near 217 intchg) Injury: 53 Ped: 0
Project Cost: $10 million Length: 16,000 feet
Subsections:
From To Length (ft) Cost Notes
Hwy 99W Dartmouth St 2,400 $5 million Significant widening needed
Dartmouth St Hwy 217 See above
Hwy 217 Bonita 4,400 $2.2 million
Bonita Upper Booties 3,600 $1.8 million
Upper Boones City Limits 2,600 $1.3 million
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 4
y �
r
121" Ave (Walnut to Gaarde) Complete Street
Description: Construct sidewalks, bike lanes, and some landscaped planter strips along 121St Avenue from
Whistler Lane to Tippitt Street,which would complete the sidewalks and bike lanes from Walnut Street to
Gaarde Street. We would anticipate this being a context-sensitive design to minimize community impact,
with no center turn lane to save space, and the planter strip narrowing in spots with physical constraints.
Reasons to Construct: 1215[Ave carries a relatively high volume and speed of traffic. Pedestrians and
cyclists currently have no sidewalk,no bike lane, and in many areas, no place to walk outside the busy travel
lanes of this Collector that is the main access route for a significant area of Tigard. The lack of space to
walk and high volume and speed of traffic results in significant accident potential.
Daily Traffic Volume: 5,000 Functional Class: Collector
Project Area Crashes (2007 - 10): Total: 3 Injury: 1 Ped: 0
Community Interest: This is one of the most-requested projects in the City,behind Walnut St
Project Cost: $3 million Length: 2,500 feet
Prospective Funding Partners: Various bike/ped and active transportation funding programs
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 10
i
Ash Avenue Crossing of the Portland & Western Railroad (and WES)
Description: Connect Ash Avenue from Commercial St across the railroad tracks to Burnham St. This
would be an at-grade crossing. A Bridge over or tunnel under the tracks would not be feasible due to grade,
community impact, cost, drainage, and/or flood plain issues.
Reasons to Construct: The existing rail line is a barrier to mobility in and around downtown Tigard. This
crossing would enhance circulation options for people, especially pedestrians and cyclists,in the downtown
area. It would reduce potential traffic congestion on Hall Blvd and Main St, and would provide a closer
alternate to the Hall Blvd crossing.
Daily Traffic Volume: New Street Functional Class: Collector
Project Cost: $3,000,000 to $12,000,000 depending on regulatory requirements to get a new crossing
Complicating Factors: Regulatory authorities, based on state law, do not allow new at-grade rail crossings
unless a jurisdiction is willing to close an existing`meaningful' crossing. One option would be to
reconfigure Tiedeman and/or North Dakota so that one meets the other west of the tracks, and a crossing
can be closed.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 2
-11W
rt
0,
a i• ,i
h
.�b• ,� fir 'r� * -
n ;
r y
J
Bull Mountain / Benchview / 1391h Roundabout — Citizen Request
Description: Construct a roundabout at the intersection of Bull Mountain Road with Benchview Terrace
and 139 'Avenue.
Reasons to Construct: Some drivers find it difficult to pull out from Benchview and 139 '.
Daily Traffic Volume: 8,000 (Bull Mountain Road); 2,000 (Benchview); 300 (139th)
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 4 Injury: 2 Ped: 0
Functional Classification: Collector (Bull Mountain Road);Neighborhood Route (Benchview);Local
(139 `)
Project Cost: $2,000,000 (includes buying at least one house)
Jurisdiction: Bull Mountain Road is currently a County Road,but in the process of being transferred to
City jurisdiction.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 0
. 368
k
+ 3900
LU
R.;-
AAW
Commercial Street (Lincoln to Main) Sidewalk
Description: Construct a sidewalk along one side of Commercial Street under the 99W viaduct to connect
the adjacent neighborhood to downtown Tigard.
Reasons to Construct: High pedestrian volumes despite lack of facilities. The existing neighborhood has
hundreds of houses within easy walking distance of downtown Tigard's businesses and attractions, but lack
of sidewalk under the bridge is a major impediment to walking. High accident potential
Daily Traffic Volume: 1,300 Functional Class: Neighborhood Route
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 3 (Likely on 99W on bridge) Injury: 2 Ped: 0
Project Cost: $700,000 Length: 800 feet
Likely City Share: $700,000
Prospective Funding Partners:Various bike/ped and active transportation funding programs
Complicating Factors: The property south and west of Commercial is owned by the railroad; rail safety
goals include keeping pedestrians far away from rail lines. To the northeast of Commercial,it would be
somewhat difficult and expensive to get a sidewalk around the bridge supports and fill slope.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 7
3PEE�
Durham Road School 20 When Flashing
Description: Install `School 20 When Flashing' signs on Durham Road and the other streets around Tigard
High School and Durham Elementary School. 11 signs would be necessary to cover both zones.
Reasons to Construct: Improve safety by more clearly defining when the school speed 20 is in effect and
when students are to be expected in the area. Improve consistency with other school zones on major streets
in Tigard. Improve traffic flow by allowing drivers to proceed at normal speed when students are not
expected. This would allow normal speeds about 8 more hours per day for the elementary school and about
4 more hours per day for the high school.
Functional Class: Arterial (Durham Rd),Neighborhood Route, and Local
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 60 Injury: 34 Ped: 0
Community Interest: We receive many requests to remove or shorten the time of these School 20 zones,
especially in front of the elementary school.
Project Cost: $150,000
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 7
scr��o�
Existing
SPEED
LIMIT" �
wHEN
--A S'HING
beacon
Fowler ••le Schoo
t�
Greenfield Drive Completion — Citizen Request
Description: Connect Greenfield Drive across the ravine from Ridgefield Drive to Chirp Street making a
complete connection from Gaarde Street to Bull Mountain Road.
Reasons to Construct: Significant lack of connectivity in this area; there is no direct Gaarde to Bull
Mountain Road connection between Benchview (to the west) and 114`" (to the east).
Complicating Factors: Due to steep topography, a significant bridge would be necessary to cross the
ravine.
Functional Class: Neighborhood Route
Project Cost: $8 million
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 1
JYwJ rLJ., ,
MO—
3
Y 22
J s.
.. '
AW
f� Pa 7 �
L '
C t1 A hi
'
UJI
MI
p
Hall / McDonald Intersection Improvement
Description: Construct capacity improvements at the intersection of Hall Blvd and McDonald St. This
would include a second southbound through lane, and a second northbound left turn lane and the
corresponding receiving lane on McDonald.
Reasons to Construct: Congestion; Significant delays are observed at this intersection,particularly in the
afternoon peak hour.
Daily Traffic Volume: 17,500 (Hall South); 14,000 (Hall North); 11,000 (McDonald)
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 19 Injury: 7 Ped: 0
Functional Classification: Arterials
Project Cost: $5 million
Jurisdiction: Hall Blvd is a State Highway;it is not Tigard's responsibility to maintain Hall Blvd.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 4
3855
b.
Hall Blvd (McDonald to South of Bonita) Sidewalks — Citizen Request
Description:This project would fill in the gaps and complete sidewalks along Hall Blvd from McDonald St
to Bonita Road. It could be continued south of Bonita to Murdock to meet the otherwise relatively
complete sidewalks along Hall.
Reasons to Construct: This section of Hall Blvd carries a very high volume of traffic. Pieces of sidewalk
exist in this section, but neither side of the street provides a continuous connection. There are few nearby
pedestrian alternatives to this route.
Daily Traffic Volume: 17,000 Functional Class:Arterial
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 30 Injury: 14 Ped: 1
Jurisdiction: This project is on a State Highway;it is not Tigard's responsibility to maintain Hall Blvd.
Project Cost: $700,000 Length: 1,800 feet missing sidewalk
Prospective Funding Partners: ODOT, especially their bike/ped program.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 9
'
tx
_ t
Hall Blvd (Bonita to Durham) Sidewalks — Citizen Request
Description:This project would fill in the gaps and complete sidewalks along Hall Blvd from Bonita Road
to Durham Road.
Reasons to Construct: Hall Blvd carries a high volume of traffic. Pieces of sidewalk exist in this section,
but neither side of the street provides a continuous connection.
Daily Traffic Volume: 13,000 Functional Class: Arterial
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 48 Injury: 26 Ped: 2
Jurisdiction: This project is on a State Highway;it is not Tigard's responsibility to maintain Hall Blvd.
Project Cost: $1,000,000 Length: 2,800 feet missing sidewalk
Prospective Funding Partners: ODOT, especially their bike/ped program.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 9
0 1
1
.r L
North Dakota Street Bridge Replacement
Description: The existing North Dakota Street bridge over Fanno Creek is very narrow,lacks space for
pedestrians and cyclists, and may have deteriorated to a condition in which it may be eligible for bridge
replacement grant funds. This project would replace the existing bridge with a new bridge wide enough to
accommodate pedestrians and cyclists along with motor vehicles.
Reasons to Construct: Narrow bridge;No sidewalks;No bike lanes;Deteriorating bridge condition; Key
connection across Fanno Creek
Daily Traffic Volume: 4,300 Functional Class: Neighborhood Route
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 0 Injury: 0 Ped: 0
Project Cost: $3 million
Prospective Funding Partner: Federal Hazardous Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
Likely City Share: $600,000
Complicating Issues: North Dakota / Tiedeman realignment discussions
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 10
y f
ti
- = i
Scoffins / Hall / Hunziker Realignment
Description: Reconfigure the intersection so that Scoffins and Hunziker intersect Hall directly across from
each other. It appears this would be most efficiently done by moving Scoffins to the north.
Reasons to Construct: The existing offset intersection significantly hampers the efficiency with which the
traffic signal can operate; Some congestion in peak hours;Driver confusion could increase collision
potential.
Daily Traffic Volume: 12,000 (Hall); 5,000 (Hunziker); 2,500 (Scoffins)
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 4 Injury: 2 Ped: 0
Functional Class: Arterial (Hall); Collector (Hunziker and Scoffins)
Project Cost: $6,000,000 (significant right of way acquisition)
Jurisdiction: This project is on a State Highway;it is not Tigard's responsibility to maintain Hall Blvd.
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 3
,-
].2375
12375 123751237512375 423 .A
_ 12375
* �
12437 12437 x12437
12437
12437
12437 Y
• I �� S
12437 ,
12437
12437
12437 _12437
12437
Ommq S I �
8610 'I 5
8610
i
86
8430
12529 '�
Tiedeman Ave (Tigard St to Greenburg Rd) Sidewalk
Description: Construct sidewalk and bike lane along the southeast side of Tiedeman Avenue for 900 feet
southwest of Greenburg Road,which would complete the sidewalk from Greenburg Road to Tigard Street.
Reasons to Construct: Tiedeman Ave carries a relatively high volume of traffic. Pedestrians and cyclists
currently have no sidewalk or bike lane through much of this corridor that is the main connection between
significant areas of Tigard.
Daily Traffic Volume: 8,000 Functional Class: Collector
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 20 Injury: 7 Ped: 0
Project Cost: $600,000 Length: 900 feet
Prospective Funding Partners: Various bike/ped and active transportation funding programs
Complicating Factors: Railroad crossing
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 8
i
Tiedeman/Greenburg/North Dakota Intersections — Citizen Request
Description: Widen Greenburg Road to include a second northbound lane from Tiedeman Avenue to Hwy
217 and add a second left turn lane from Tiedeman Avenue onto Greenburg Road. May include minor
reconfiguration of the Tiedeman/North Dakota Intersection
Reasons to Construct: Significant traffic congestion occurs in this area,particularly during the morning
rush hour.
Daily Traffic Volume: Greenburg: 20,000 (north), 11,000 (south);Tiedeman 11,000; North Dakota 4,000
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 55 Injury: 19 Ped: 1
Functional Classification: Arterial (Greenburg) Collector (Tiedeman);Neighborhood Route (North
Dakota)
Project Cost: $6 million.
Complicating Factors: Tiedeman / North Dakota reconfiguration discussions. This project would need
to include widening the Greenburg Road bridge over Ash Creek
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 7
Tiedeman / North Dakota Realignment
Description: Reconfigure Tiedeman Ave and/or North Dakota St so that one meets the other west of the
railroad tracks. Several options are possible.
Reasons to Construct: This would address traffic problems at the Tiedeman/North Dakota intersection
caused by its proximity to the Tiedeman/Greenburg intersection. This project would also allow closure of
an at-grade rail crossing,which could be `traded' for an Ash Ave rail crossing in downtown Tigard.
Daily Traffic Volume: 11,000 (Tiedeman East); 8,000 (Tiedeman West); 4,000 (North Dakota)
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 34 Injury: 12 Ped: 0
Functional Classification: Collector (Tiedeman);Neighborhood Route (North Dakota)
Project Cost: $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 depending on options chosen.
Complicating Factors: Significant property, building, and/or environmental impact
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 10 (North Dakota Bridge)
■ 11 111253Ii2
77,k0735 •R4- 7{ 3 1113311131 � 111s0
l 1
,1! 3 = "111 , Si141
11,90
Q
5 Op 12251
♦ �a� 101
1
1 12 1 lozso � _ 112x$ lizs-
i12sv $""` i255
'1125
.f1 - 1A5511T 5
O - •,� 1112 5
112551—
i307 0 '3 i-ilw. - p`12651
13 255
F.' 12L5
4 •1 01
1334
17 359
11 57
i3S1 �'
50S X71355\-
_
.� ' - � 1S 9 111751147
!1 M I
i 53 2 130
� 14891
11530 714 9
289
10., i 3 a 69 P 9922
..fi. 1_20 rr
Upper Boones Ferry and Durham Rd Adaptive Signal Coordination
Description: Install an adaptive traffic signal control system connecting several intersections along Upper
Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road from Interstate 5 to near Tigard High School.
Reasons to Construct: Significant travel time savings could be realized by adjusting signals in real time to
meet demand peaks of office buildings, commutes, schools, etc. Turns on main route cause difficulties for
traditional coordination;Existing traffic congestion.
Daily Traffic Volume: 20,000 to 28,000
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 174 Injury: 79 Ped: 0
Functional Classification: Arterial
Project Cost: $65,000 (match for$600,000 Federal funds)
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 2
( i
i.
{' p
t.is
a —
-
�y
Walnut Street (Tiedeman to Pacific Hwy 99W) Complete Street
Description:This project would construct a predominantly two-lane road with turn lanes where needed
(such as from Watkins Ave to Hwy 99W), plus sidewalks, bike lanes, planter strips, and storm drainage
along Walnut Street from Tiedeman Ave to Hwy 99W. This would include adding turn lanes to help
congestion at the Walnut/Hwy 99W intersection.
Reasons to Construct: No bike lanes; sidewalk only on one side; Once the 116`''- Tiedeman section is
complete, this will be last remaining piece of Walnut to upgrade from a country road to an urban street.
Daily Traffic Volume: 9,500 Functional Class: Arterial
Project Area Crashes (2007-10): Total: 41 (most at 99W) Injury: 12 Ped: 1
Project Cost: $7 million Length: 2,400 feet
Complicating Factors: Tight right-of-way (buildings close to road);Wetland crossing
Pedestrian/Cyclist Subcommittee Benefit Rating (0 to 10 Scale): 8
.yk _
.. N
'Moab. _
■ ■ 1
Project Voting Form — Tigard 2013-18 Capital Improvement Plan
Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee November, 2012
The 18 transportation projects listed below have been nominated for inclusion in the 2013-18
Capital Improvement Plan to be designed and/or constructed in the next five years. Your task is to
rank these projects in terms of which would be best for the city as a whole, considering all factors, to
build in the next five years.
In the table below,please assign 10 points to your top priority project, 9 points to your second
priority project, 8 points to your third priority, and so on down to one point for your tenth priority
project. Projects that did not make your`top ten' should be left blank.
Project Name Points
72nd Ave (Hwy 217 to Elmhurst St) Widening and Sidewalks
72nd Ave (Hwy 99W to South City Limits) Sidewalks
121 st Ave (Walnut to Gaarde) Complete Street
Ash Avenue Crossing of the Portland &Western Railroad
Bull Mountain / Benchview / 139th Roundabout
Commercial Street (Lincoln to Main) Sidewalk
Durham Road School 20 When Flashing
Greenfield Drive Completion
Hall / McDonald Intersection Improvement
Hall Blvd (McDonald to South of Bonita) Sidewalks
Hall Blvd (Bonita to Durham) Sidewalks
North Dakota Street Bridge Replacement
Scoffins / Hall / Hunziker Realignment
Tiedeman Ave (Tigard St to Greenburg Rd) Sidewalk
Tiedeman/Greenberg/North Dakota Intersections
Tiedeman / North Dakota Realignment
Upper Boones Ferry, Durham Rd Adaptive Signal Coordination