DDR2014-00002 DDR2O14 - 00002
TVF & R STATION
# 51 ADDITION
NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION
IN
DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (DDR) 2014-00002 11111 .
TVF&R STATION #51 ADDITION T I GARD
120 DAYS = 8-15-14
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: TVF&R STATION #51 ADDITION
CASE NO.: Downtown Design Review(DDR) Compliance Letter DDR2014-00002
PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing a 996 square foot addition to the northwest side of the
building to enclose an existing patio area. The proposal also includes seismic
upgrades and ADA compliance upgrades to the interior of the building.
APPLICANT: Ian Gelbrich
921 SW Washington, Suite 250
Portland, OR 97205
OWNER: Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue
20665 SW Blanton Street
Aloha, OR 97007
LOCATION: 8935 SW Burnham Street,WCTM 2S102AD,Tax Lot 01900
ZONING
DESIGNATION: MU-CBD: Mixed Use — Central Business District. The MU-CBD zoning
district is designed to provide a pedestrian friendly urban village in Downtown
Tigard. A wide variety of commercial, civic, employment, mixed-use, multi-
family and attached single family residences are permitted. New development
and re-development is required to conform to the standards of Chapter 18.610.
SUB-AREA: Scoffins Street-Commercial Street. This sub-area is intended to provide an
opportunity for higher density residential as well as an employment base
comprised of civic,office and commercial uses in the areas of Commercial
Street and Scoffins. Residential-only buildings, office/commercial buildings,and
mixed use developments are all permitted.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.610
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request for Downtown Design Review. The findings and conclusions on which
DDR211141 K$i)1'111,&12 ST T1ON#51:11)1)I'110N PAGE 1 OF G
Ithe decision is based are noted in Section IV.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. SITE AND PROPOSAL INFORMATION
Site Information&History
The site is located on SW Burnham Street, and is developed with a single tenant building and associated
landscaping and parking. The site and surrounding properties were rezoned from CBD (Central Business
District) to MU-CBD (Mixed Use —Central Business District) in 2010 to create the Tigard Downtown
District. Sub-areas were established within the downtown, and this site is located within the Scoffins
Street - Commercial Street sub-area. Surrounding parcels are developed with a mix of retail uses,personal
services,and restaurants.
Proposal Information
The applicant's proposal includes the following:
1. A 996 square foot addition to the northwest side of the building to enclose an existing patio
area to accommodate a new fitness room, dining room and exterior patio area.
2. Seismic upgrades to the building.
3. ADA renovations to the existing restrooms.
4. Upgrades to the landscaping and relocation and additional bicycle parking.
Because the proposal meets the threshold of a Track 1 Design Review Compliance Letter (Tigard
Development Code Section 18.610.010.E.1), the application is being processed through a Type I
procedure.
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Zoning Districts (18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts)
Tigard Downtown District Development and Design Standards (18.610)
18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT
Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020
Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts.
The site is located in the MU-CBD zoning district: Mixed Use—Central Business District.
Uses: Section 18.520.030 (Table18.520.1—Use Table Commercial Zones)
The proposed addition it to an emergency services uses, which is an outright permitted use. This
standard is met.
18.610 TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT
DDR2014001101'1'V1,&12 S I'.A lION#51.\DDrI1ON 1'A(11 2 OI.G
18.610.010 Purpose and Procedures
C. Applicability.
2. An addition, expansion, modification, and/or site improvements associated with such
lawfully preexisting uses and structures shall be allowed, provided the application for such
proposed project moves toward compliance with the applicable Development Code standards.
Only those Downtown Building and Site Design standards applicable to the proposed
expansion modification or site improvements to the existing development shall be applicable.
The proposal modifies an existing structure. Applicable building and site design standards are
addressed below. Applicable development criteria are listed with findings showing how the proposed
project moves the structure towards compliance with district standards. This standard is met.
E. Procedures
1. Track 1: Design Review Compliance Letter using Design Standards.
a. Applicability
x. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by less than
10% or under 5,000 square feet.
xi. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open
space which does not reduce the open space area below the minimum
required by this code or reduces the open space area by less than 10%.
The proposal is for an addition, landscaping upgrades and interior improvements to the existing
building to accommodate an existing emergency services use. The addition will reduce the landscaping
approximately by 5.8°0, or 1, 201 square feet. A Track 1 Downtown Design Review is being requested;
this standard is met.
18.610.030 Building and Site Design Standards
A. Create Vibrant ground floors, streetscapes and rights-of-way; provide weather protection;
and promote safety and security. Design standards in this section are intended to foster
vibrant, inviting streetscapes and sidewalk-facing ground floors and entryways. They are also
intended to create buildings that are easily accessible and provide protection from the elements
for pedestrians. They also will help ensure that the ground floor promotes a sense of interaction
between activities in the building and activities in the public realm.
1. Street facade.
a. Street-facing facades shall be built in proximity to the street. This standard is
met when at least 50% of the ground floor front building elevation(s) is located
no further from the front property line than the maximum front setback standard
established in Table 18.610.1; and, where maximum street-facing side setbacks
are required within the Main Street sub-area, at least 50% of the ground floor
street-facing side building elevation(s) is located no further from the street-
facing side property line than the maximum street-facing side setback standard
established in Table 18.610.
As shown on the site plan, the proposed addition is set back 61 feet from the front property line. The
maximum front yard setback of 20 feet, listed in Table 18.610.1, is not applicable as these setbacks
apply to new buildings only. This standard does not apply.
3. Windows:
a. Ground Floor windows for nonresidential and mixed use buildings:
1)I)R2014(MMMiI 1'\I&R SI'.VI1O\#51 .ADD111ON I)\GI;3 O1'(
i. 60% minimum ground floor window coverage for street-facing wall
(minimum window coverage includes any glazed portions of doors).
ii. Ground Floor Window Transparency. All buildings with nonresidential
ground floor windows must have a visible transmittance (VT) of 0.6 or
higher, with the exception of medical and dental offices, which may have
tinted windows.
The submitted drawings show that the existing structure has ground floor windows along the frontage
along SW Burnham Street. The building addition facing SW Burnham Street is an enclosed patio with a
40 % open wall with light screening. The wall to the actual building is behind the screen and has 70%
glazing. The intent of the ground floor is to promote interaction between activities in the building and
activities in the public realm. However, the addition is set back more than 60 feet from the street and
screened from view by landscaping. The addition does not meet the intent of the standard; therefore
standard does not apply.
c. Upper floor windows/doors for all buildings:
i. 30% minimum upper floor window coverage for each floor of the street-
facing wall (minimum window coverage includes any glazed portions of
doors).
ii. The required upper floor window/balcony door percentage does not apply
to floors where sloped roofs and dormer windows are used.
iii. Upper floor windows shall be vertically oriented (a minimum vertical to
horizontal dimension ratio of 1.5:1).
This is a single story building. This standard does not apply.
d. Windows: Window shadowing for all buildings:Windows shall be designed to
provide shadowing.This can be accomplished by recessing windows three
inches into the façade and/or incorporating trim of a contrasting material or
color.
All proposed windows will be recessed to provide shadowing. This standard is met.
4. Weather Protection. For non-residential and mixed use buildings:
a. A projecting façade element (awning, canopy, arcade, or marquee) is required on
the street-facing façade of the street with the highest functional classification.
b. Awnings/marquees/canopies may project a minimum of three feet and a
maximum of six feet from the façade (a maximum of four feet into the public right-
of-way).
c. The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the
element to the sidewalk.
d. Awnings must match the width of storefronts or window openings.
e. Internally lit awnings are not permitted.
f. Awnings must be made of glass, metal, or exterior grade fabric (or a combination
of these materials).
There is an existing canopy above the entry to the building facing SW Burnham Street. The existing
canopy projects 8 feet from the facade and provides a 12.5 foot clearance from the bottom of the canopy
to the pedestrian walkway.This standard is met.
C. Integrated Building Facade Standards
DDR2014NNN)1 TVF&RSI'ATION#51:■DDI11ON PAGE 4OF6
Intent. Build upon and improve Downtown Tigard's architecture by creating an attractive and
unified building facade that encourages ground floor activities, and creates visually interesting
facades and roofs.
1. Nonresidential and Mixed Use Building Tri-Partite Facades. Nonresidential and mixed
use buildings two stories and above shall have three clearly defined elements on the
street-facing facade(s): a base (extends from the sidewalk to the bottom of the second
story or the belt course/string course that separates the ground floor from the middle of
the building); a middle (distinguished from the top and base of the building by use of
building elements); and a top (roof form/element at the uppermost portion of the
facade that visually terminates the facade). A tripartite facade creates a unified facade
and breaks up vertical mass.
The existing structure does not possess a tripartite facade. This standard does not apply.
3. Roof forms.
a. The roof form of a building shall follow one (or a combination) of the following
forms:
i. Flat roof with parapet or cornice;
ii. Hip roof;
iii. Gabled roof;
iv. Full mansard roof;
v. Dormers;
vi. Shed roof.
b. All sloped roofs (other than full mansard roofs) exposed to view from adjacent public
or private streets and properties shall have a minimum 5/12 pitch.
c. Sloped roofs, shall have eaves, exclusive of rain gutters, that must project from the
building wall at least 12 inches.
d. All flat roofs or those with a pitch of less than 5/12 shall be architecturally treated or
articulated with a parapet wall that must project vertically above the roof line at least
12 inches and/or a cornice that must project from the building face at least six
inches.
e. When an addition to an existing structure or a new structure is proposed in an
existing development, the roof forms for the new structures shall have similar slope
and be constructed of the same materials as the existing roof.
f. Green roof features and/or rooftop gardens are encouraged. As part of the
development permit, applicant shall execute a covenant ensuring the maintenance
of any green roof. The covenant shall be approved by the director on city-provided
forms.
The addition will match slope and parapet of the existing building. The parapet wall projects 3(1 inches
from the roof surface. No green roof features are proposed. This standard is met.
E. Assure building quality, permanence and durability - Building Materials: The following
exterior building materials or finishes are prohibited:
1. Vinyl siding;
2. T-111 or similar sheet materials;
3. Plain concrete block (not including split faced, colored, or other block designs
that mimic stone, brick, or other masonry); foundation material may be skim-
coated concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more
than two feet;
l)DR2014oxxxil'1 VI,&R SI'.ATION#51 -A1)1 1 1ON I \(;I.1 5(11;G
4. Mirrored glass.
The proposal does not include any of the prohibited materials. This standard is met.
18.610.060 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements
A. Parking standards. New development in the Downtown must conform to the requirements
of Chapter 18.765 with the following exceptions.
2. All other uses. For all other uses the minimum off-street vehicle parking requirements
shall be 75% of the total computed from Table 18.765.2. Bicycle parking requirements
shall not be reduced.
The building is with the addition will be 10,725 square feet. Emergency service uses require 3 parking
spaces per 1,000; a total of 25 parking spaces are required with the 75% reduction (allowed in the
Tigard Downtown District; TDC 18.610.060.A.2). A total of 6 bicycle parking spaces are required
calculated at a rate of 0.5 per 1,000 square feet. The site plan shows a total of 25 parking spaces and 6
bicycle parking spaces. This standard is met.
SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
A Downtown Design Review Compliance Letter is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's
decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first.
The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON APRIL 28, 2014.
AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 29, 2014.
Questions:
If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
1 V/ I kat- April 28.2014
APPROVED BY: A. 1-s Kowacz DATE
Associate Planner
DDR211141 N N NI1 TVF&R Sl'ATION#51 ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 6
RECEIVED
City of Tigard APR 1 0 2014
Design PIANN , , E�
�C Downtown Review
TIGARD Compliance Letter - Type I Application
'GENERAL INFORMATION
Property Address/Location(s): ] ✓I'V t.EJs{ f'
( , c I -1zZ 73. FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): NE, Vq, ' CTtc 2, T'Z5 Case No.(s): DD12 20
Site Size: 1G/L/ Other Case No.(s):
Applicant*: di . Fee: U . '13
Address: VI i fV u446014(1 / !> 2A9r3 Receipt No.: ICI CD 5 3(47
City/State:/i Pj Zip: 771c w Date: 9 to
Primary Contact: L
.Application Accepted By:
Phone: -b09•721.1-i 'Fax: p Date Determined Complete: y I V f t 9
E-Mail: 4, %Ii tL L i/� Fed ifo-w
Revised: 6/24/2013 1 I
C\CURPLN\Masters\I.:u,��l .� \p plications\Downtown Design Review-Tr pc 1.docx
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*:
(Attach list if more than one)
/ v REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Address: /ifbfI ,.3(/ 7 AV6 Phone:**.Tff(/i5b0 (Applications will not be accepted without the
City/State: 71C 7/ Gf Z Zip: '77 Z 3 following required submittal elements)
Application Form
Track 1:Design Review Compliance Letter Owner's Signature/Written Authorization •
A Design Compliance Letter provides for a Type I review process, ❑' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed
using the clear and objective Design Standards. It is intended for ^A Site Plan(4 Large Plans&1 Reduced to 8 t/z" x 11")
smaller buildings and site renovation projects, which meet the YY ,
threshold of 18.610.010.E.1. Applicant sStatement/Narrative(4 copies)
Filing Fee
Applicant's Statement/Narrative: •
The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed
changes. Applicable criteria and design standards in 18.610 must be
addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to
provide the information needed to process the application would be
reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of
the proposal.
In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in
compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard
Development Code: To complete this review, the Applicant's
proposal must include a discussion indicating how other
requirements of this title are still satisfied. These requirements
include but are not limited to: access, landscaping and screening,
waste and recyclable storage, parking, sensitive lands, signs, tree
removal, vision clearance, and streets and utilities. Please see
section 18.610.035 of the Tigard Development Code for a complete
list.
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2
*When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)must sign this application
in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application.
Responsibility Statement: As the applicant submitting this application for a land use review, I certify that all of the above
statements and the statements in the site plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and I acknowledge that any
permit issued,based on this application may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. I am also responsible for
gaining the permission of the owner(s) of the property listed above in order to apply for this review and for reviewing the
responsibility statement with them. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with
the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions
that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,
including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. The City of Tigard
is not liable if any of these actions are taken without the consent of the owner(s) of the property. In order to process this review,
City staff may visit the site, photograph the property, or otherwise document the site as part of the review. By my signature, I
indicate my understanding and agreement to the Responsibility Statement.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this day of ,20
LOY_ c�, e k,e `�v v&e wee�Z. --�d,�, -Po - S 15v\o,-t-u>r e
Applicant/Authorized Agent's Signature Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2
RECEIVED
APR 1 0 2019
TIGAP
PLA NCI GG/ENGINEE 1;
71 ■
■ City of Tigard
Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP,HELD BY:
TIGARD
File# I I Other Case# DA--) 0. zso, ( 44 - 00002_
Date I I By Receipt# I I Fee I I Date Complete I
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
El Adjustment/Variance(II) D Historic Overlay(H or III) 0 Site Development Review(II)
❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) 0 Subdivision(II or III)
❑Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) El Zone Change(III)
Development Code Amendment(IV) 0 Planned Development(III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation(IV)
❑Downtown Design Review(II,III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or III)
NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY RILL OCCUR(Address if available) ---
F -#lrc 1 1 T1 P-D i w.... '11 Z-Z
TAX MAPS do TAX LOT NOS.
1JE- 2/y z) Tz.S, --LV4 VJ.r. 't1''
F 1�` >
TOTAL SITE SIZE
APPLICANT.
NNe,l -tZ--r
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY,//SST,AT�/zIIP f z. --ri T ()
PHONE NO. PAX NO.
�byJ - ZZ-7- t- 8c.00
PRIMARY 1CON TACT PERSON PHONE NO.
1 S61*- 17! _. IZ
E-MAIL
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach lit if more than one) I
--NPoA-ir-1
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STA /Z�
„P.TbT - PM. At Ti- Co-GI 1 0 q-7? a-3
FAX NO.
'57;1 - Z1-/I _162 I i
*When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submit a written authorization with this,a, hcation.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) —
A li AO/ • l,7 F [A!/-7 A� 7r7 f'1 fi,/. 47._)
13, -1 46,k4 va
I\I •Ii. Lam id i..// W ,_ _v, 1 � ' 0_ 1 • •I v/(Z-
MS
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tieard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tioard-ttr_onv I Poor leaf,
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and
subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
• All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are
true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is
found that any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
Acts-Tor 0/iv
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall'Blvd. Tioanl OR 97971 I 5n1_71 sZ14)1 I I D...Y
92034063 :71---'
i WashlncmnCounty t
( Y
w.. n;''I WARRANTY DEED-STATUTORY FORM ? 3"~ •
Reino Tarkianinen and Marilyn Tarkianinen, convey k''‘''''':).'? limo
Y , grantors, conve and warrant to Tualatin Valley a ztv
}•: l " Fire and Rescue,A Rural Fire Protection District,Grantee,the following described real property �.(;r'•'
r ` free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein, situated in Washington County, ,$ '
i a Oregon, to wit:
Sec Exhibit "A"attached to and by reference made a part of this warranty deed. » 'r
°._ :; ›4,s, Q
r• Reserving, however, unto the Grantor, its successors and assigns, the following:NONE >t
at(
7` THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF er
'•.i .f. APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON •L '.1c;'
ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE COY OR COUNTY PLANNING CO
;^ DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. `�`,a
:}• The said property is free from encumbrances except Conditions, Restrictions, Restrictive t ''
L.,�,, O
;x'.31 Covenants and Easements of Record,if any,and the provisions of any ordinance of the Tualatin
,• Valley Fire and Rescue, enacted prior to the date hereof.
ilk s ' p
• Y 4 The true consideration for this conveyance is One Hundred sev>art�c TIME TeousAND, "
y;+ EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($173,800.00) (As specified per the requirements of ORS �j?t
93.030, a
,,„e; '1 5 Dated this day f M�}
? Y V 1992. 1;,
r ?0
yy 8
• :i1., ��¢ Rocera.r Of Remo Tarkianinen •
?'• '."= 1%1Amerlamn Title Ins ura nut CompsnyOttJ U
''rk ;j i by I/
JS 1.: .
•'i if n Tarkianinen
0 lit
State of Oregon )
N2uGt/lOnvtli..- ) ss.
' ! County of-Vashinsten )
:
•
'' On this '2 day of /��� , 1992,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and
'• for said County and State,personally appeared the within named Reino Tarkianinen and Marilyn
Tarkianinen who are known to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within
.' instalment and acknowledged that they executed the same freely and voluntarily for the
/.1:.' purposes therein contained.
K?T°r{". WACHINOTON COUNTY
..�. `L .1 REAL AROFLnTY TRANSFER TAX
`+ t,C'_': t 1'1y.00 s t,e ..TA
2
cs "5 . 51.
�•l�. FCE F:-.!O G:iTE
VI .•i
Ai :':: i3
vq •~'' - % i'±:i`=.s.1T:War JJ...', .6•!•f?" }r•'3f;r.•eJr'i•v.. .J,}•j i 1' ' '11.h1, - :.
i I •
,.t.• f 3. .t; w 7 ,s 4.
'ems n:p1 t7 I w r r ti L r,-r,,5:,:...,.. .. . ..
-
-- _. --- -- ,
L; —•
—
Ef I N WITNESS WI REOF,I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year last
-{' above written.
•
c=, .:�, OFFICIAL SEAL �'-
;1 •r . ,•.•j•• PATAICtAPARSONS
e<T III <.
NOTARY , 4*-,'.;;;;;;!.
�'_
COMMISSION NO 011313 Notary Public for Oregon „j
My CouMsoN XPRES JAN.20,1990 My commission Expires }�:<�ii:'"'
,- J�,.. ..ti�?:,,
'r.-'1.P .1 Mir '.
y1' b� After recording return to: '+ �':
� Gary Wells t; '
p �� I< Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
. :,•e'4.t- 20665 SW Blanton Road .«• jr
:t`1' fir' Aloha, OR 97007 • 1#'41a•
'.;t `din 3y
I••
,Lr
-'r .5;- I
,'•.`'t, 17••
+ -
•• . i.
AT ; a k twit. •.')' 7tt •y•'i r�, «..'-47.•:'.;:-;,r :, } , . ' 7;;;;%% ( .E 1, 4, +.A.1...:. - E',i
4.,�,.- ;'. . w� ..•3,- rec ``!� ,t: r , , , :ti r' i y.•/" a x g� Y,ar , , r _ia
t • I f" 7
x�< . `` it f / 6J't 2 J . .air^
7Y�l+ -, w'At<e.,.1 'f a ; � n,I. ,. 1,v..S. .e1an„ .'.•l + � f . i �r� , 4� � � J'.: �` g,� `r+ r y•�;� if .1 ^�^',
t
} 1' r L J. S' : < j ; J7 Yi64y xy ',W.-ill':s. r, 7r
r ' ,.10-1‘..::71.. r }�j4
:r i ,`w, .t� y, .'. �'v,fi c,��,.1r ",i I1 < : r l 1t'ir'f''r "5 m'' )+3I. - .'.14 '•
< <.",ry�s'P�i t.::(1 +£ti.r- r �tvati-- \a t« i~� _.4 t yt 't �r 70 -l`'jx1• 4.-'/I.,4,.f}, c;y„ -r<y ..
,ail ' - a!1'y,t r..M1 ..+,i: S•b.ii t < ♦ a r r „.i fi+ti "� �rh: i L... .1 � r ...,44.!..,41-
�.:�lJ { <lY-.y:
::o 3Y' ....1'SWw}V ;:W.Itt..7.�. .�XC+: .(.:l/:.. '.S.S,:u.•<ti �.•'7 ,n .. ""P''' =1'21.:r•
`r R 'tt' - f,�f: I!`i��,rgi.I,i�' •�.t.4.t r Lt..... t.. f +^.1 t r, '1 4+7lr'A''rK 'I 4 t.•111'..L., '+Ip7 z
r:1-", y,' ! yf" 7;T,+r S-,r�6 1'. .!71W-0-1.1,:r. +,. ,x.....1..+ S r "< 4'•,s °'414.a 1 15+. /r',.•i..' ``t- -1,
' >?'k L r y J .1. u r v .r t rn ) , t ?.,1 jPr , t k4 Yf p• ./. 4
�"' l - P�'._ ,41V•7. D Lri< 4... „4 Ysf t iJ+^r7W h Ir ...c t i h": sgz., t...A,l 1... 3n',1- -- hp ..). - -
-.11.,4•-•,::-
C: 't t,sl..w c ,. ,,,},4#«wQ7M7 J«+fY.Y.�.,...1'i ,1r1..+•�LrrZ<4l'1. 1r, r , , ; '.vcy t yil 'ly Ai`" .1 .:
•I • +• (... {PP /. :..:.•
•.
-' r r f�
■":1. i. :a + rt 1 G mm_ ;
' t 'i, 1 .nu 4
;s ' Via%" *
Order No.706542 ;,--
`, EXHIBIT'A` ,tr ..;•, f i Ttto following described 3: .
ttg property shoaled in Section 2,Township 2 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette a .i •
. If Meddle In the Clty of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon.
a.
',-..'..4...17,....114.. Beginning at a point In the center of County Road 907,North 46.46'West 60 feet,more or lees,from the
moat Westerly corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to W.J.Kerry by deed recorded In Book 146, `'
. , page 105, Deed Raoonds, Washington County, Oregon, said true '' .
i+ ' 1' Westery corer of that tract of land conveyed to nfr �d dM�t9, 9 2l in too m32, ,. µ'.r_,•• 'p .t.i .' page 360,Records of Washington County,Oregon; King Mor recorded 3rded May to the We Book ght-
r ,,.x;) ragor>;thence North 13•East 367.76 feet to the Westerly right. •'fir .
:•. , J) of-way of the Oregon Electric Ralway Co.;thence Northerly along said right-of-way 118 foot,more or less, s't
r,;
�• to a point which le also the most Easterly corner d that parcel of land contracted to Joseph W.Davis,et
' '?
4, -),:/-; al,recorded Au
-` goat 2 3,1 9 8 8,to Book 812,page 441,Aecorda of Washington County,Oregon;thence South ,..,
42'19'West 376 feet,more or tees,to the centerline of saki County Road No.997;thence following said =•' ..,
1, i s centerline in a Southeasterly direction 117 feet.more or leas to the true point of beginning. ^°ax,r,'•
K.
f, is% Fvri`
t ' l.,1::::7: !::-. •t SLATE OF OREGON tt -
•%, County of Washington f SS
i.• `.. I Derr fl
Jerry ,i$ Wiltsessment
and Taxatan A
N .,; Ihat tne9 yt , c r�rdq aCon.
recetvecti •0 t I ling was �t
i saxi Ya W of
av y?-" * i.�ar I R.% :o a •
Y N Ex-
? - ,e :, Doc 92034053
R
•
ecta: 77413 •
h:� K '_ OS/19/1992 10.3 217.00
5:44AM
f./ " •• .
•
• i r �.
.� fy c• , r rr11 , ,
'...E.11,1-..1--.'‘':-.:.i I 7 / ! ti •' , f(. u:t; .
;eft ' e "r,'. t , % 'a •/ , _ - ♦ `./1 ., f .ry' Yf'J"▪•#ri •
/ -e 1 Syr ▪ a i•
y 1..._ . i.e. }. / _ . ]yvf_4 iw!f tii a. y-M.•∎..'Y i4 t w
C 7- �,1 T�'i:t7 -7 r.:, t - •'. ' /• ' u fs,5ie� }i•
C# 7,..4,141;1::',/,44,i4;•''::'t r?1,r t(:, . . } .. . r A' -.Y�r .a F4lj4.'ivY4�? f4t.M.'•r1. 1:•
t x r..�•,61i�.att;4.t y, •.may, `,� s e r Ilgii��.� y, ,rt �y
iiy�yy, W22yy;„, i•YY I r *�a"�k[5�tj�,•?Mr Cl t:fir + ��}}3�
.�• yly ,frtrs.7+&a _ _. t Grit yfo7tr .. rllaL
• . _. ..... ._ ._. - +r , ,....
HECEIVED
Hennebery Eddy A 1 0 2014 p
Architects C17YPR OFTIGgg
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
Proposal Letter
FIRE STATION 51 — SEISMIC UPGRADE, RENOVATION AND ADDITION
8935 SW Burnham St,Tigard,OR 97223
10 April 2014
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue is pursuing a voluntary seismic upgrade, renovation and
addition to Station 51 which is located at 8935 SW Burnham Street, adjacent to the Tigard
Public Works building.
Type 1 Criteria:
In response to section 18.610.010,the project is requesting a Type 1 review based on the
following criteria.
1. The changes to the windows will not decrease the required minimum window
coverage.
2. The entry and loading doors are not being changed in this project.
3. There are no new awnings or canopies being added.
4. See below for altered landscape calculation.
5. There is no modification to off street parking nor any reduction of existing spaces.
6. There are no new fences or retaining walls
7. There is no change to the existing grade.
8. There is not increase in overall building height.
9. There is no change to access ways.
10. The addition to the building is under 5,000 SF.
11. There is no reduction of common space.
Site:
The scope of site work per this project is limited to reworking an existing ramp that doesn't
currently meet ADA slope requirements, and replacing any landscaping impacted by the
addition.
Parking:
The total number of parking stalls is not changing.There is enough parking to accommodate
the additional square footage being added. See calculations below:
Required Parking=(3 spaces per 1000 SF)x .75
Total SF upon project completion = 10,725 SF
10,725 / 1000= 10.725 x 3= 32.175 spaces x .75 = 24.13 spaces
Existing Spaces= 25 striped spaces
Bicycle Parking:
The current bicycle parking is being moved to accommodate the expansion work.The new
location is visible to the street and located adjacent to the Community Room which receives the
most public traffic.We will meet the required number of spaces outlined below.
Required bicycle spaces=Total building SF/1000 SF x.5
Total SF upon project completion = 10,725 SF
10,725 SF/ 1,000= 10.725 x.5= 5.36 spaces
6 spaces will be provided.
921 SW WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 250
PORTLAND OREGON 97205
503 227 4860 TEL
503 227 4920 FAX
www.henneberyeddy.com
Hennebery Eddy
Architects
Impervious Area:
The impervious area of the site is increasing by 773 SF.This is outlined below:
New Addition SF+New Covered Patio Area— Existing Covered Patio Area
996 SF+ 287 SF— 510= 773 SF of Net Increase.
Landscaping:
Landscaping will impacted by the construction of the addition.The total amount of impacted
landscape is less than 15%of the whole.
Total site landscaping is 20,695 SF+/-.
Total impacted landscaping is 1,201 SF.
Resulting percentage of impacted landscape is 5.8%
There will be no change to walkways from the public right of way to the building.There will be
no changes to the existing buffering and screening.There will be no changes to trash and
recycling locations or procedures.The project does not fall into sensitive land,steep slope,
urban forestry plan, clear vision or new lot requirements.
Building:
The station was built in 1993 and is a slab on grade building with a wood framed roof bearing
on clay masonry walls. In addition to the voluntary seismic upgrade the station is being
renovated and added on to in order to better accommodate a double company crew and an
increase in female crew members.The renovations will include an ADA upgrade to the public
toilet and a conversion of the existing fitness room into new female locker room and dorm
room.The addition to the building fits between the existing building and existing sidewalk to
the west and includes a new fitness room and an expanded dining room.To accommodate this
expansion and existing covered patio area is being replaced in a new location.
PAGE 2 OF 2
Hennebery Eddy
Architects
Type 1 Design Compliance Letter
FIRE STATION 51 — SEISMIC UPGRADE, RENOVATION AND ADDITION
8935 SW Burnham St,Tigard,OR 97223
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue is pursuing a voluntary seismic upgrade, renovation and
addition to Station 51,which is located at 8935 SW Burnham Street adjacent to the Tigard
Public Works building.The addition to the building is necessary to better serve the needs of a
double company station and accommodate an increase in female fire fighters.The station was
originally built in 1991 and has a red brick facade with punch metal clad windows, roofs and
accents.The roof forms are primarily flat with a gable roof over the apparatus bay and an entry
canopy; both clad in bronze colored standing seam metal roofing.The primary entry to the
building faces Burnham Street with public parking to either side of the building. Staff parking
and operations are at the back of the building and are shielded from the street.
The addition to the building fits within the existing landscape zone between the building and
the sidewalk. It houses expanding living functions, including a new fitness room,dining room
and exterior patio that will replace the existing patio.The new addition is clad in a flat metal
composite panel finished to match the color of the other bronze accents on the site. It has a flat
roof set at a lower height to facilitate drainage from the existing roof.The addition provides two
staff only entrances to the building.
18.610.020 Building and Site Development Standards
A. Sub Areas
This project lies within the Fanno-Burnham Subdistrict as outlined in section A4.
B1.Table 18.610.1 MU-CBD Development Standards Matrix
Per footnote '1'this project is not required to follow the standards set forth in the table, as it is
not a new building.
B2. Parking Location
This project only updates the ramp at the ADA stalls to bring the slope into compliance. No
existing parking spaces are reconfigured.
B3. Rooftop Equipment/Screening
The project is adding one new mechanical unit that is 30"tall,as measured from the roof
surface,and is set back 15'from the existing parapet.The existing parapet is 30"tall from the
roof surface,and functions as mechanical screening.
B4.Other Exterior Equipment
None added.
18.610.025 Connectivity
Per the City of Tigard Transportation Plan,there are no proposed connectivity improvements
plan in front of or through the site.
18.610.030 Building and Site Design Standards
Al. Street Facade
921 SW WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 250
PORTLAND OREGON 97205
503 227 4860 TEL
503 227 4920 FAX
www.henneberyeddy.com
Hennebery Eddy
Architects
Due to the required operation of a fire station the existing building exceeds the maximum
setback from the street. Per footnote '1'of the MU-CBD Site Development Standards Matrix the
building addition is not required to meet the 20' maximum setback standard.
A2. Primary Entry
The new addition does not affect the existing primary entry to the building.
A3.Windows
The new addition does not affect existing ground floor street facing windows.
A4.Weather Protection
The existing building has a canopy that marks the front entry.There are no new awnings or
canopy proposed out of concern that they would detract from the front entry.
B1.Cohesive Architectural Facade Standards
The addition is intended to be secondary but complimentary to the original building.The
building's west facade does incorporate architectural bays less than 30'-0"
Cl. Integrated Building Facade Standard
The addition incorporates the tripartite organization with a concrete base, middle
window/screen zone,and an implied parapet zone of composite metal panel.
C2. Residential Building Facades
Project does not fall within this categorization.
C3. Roof Forms
Per item 'e'of this section,the addition matches the slope and parapet condition of the
existing building.
D1.Create Street Corners with Strong Identity.
Project is not located on a corner property.
El. Building Materials
The addition is clad in a flat metal composite panel that matches the color of the bronze
accents around the existing building. No vinyl siding,T-111 or exposed concrete block will be
used.
Fl. Mixed Use and Commercial Developments Greater than 60,000 SF.
The size of this project is under 60,000SF and does not trigger this requirement.
F2. Mixed Use Buildings with Residential Units and Residential Only Multifamily Developments
While the project does not fit this definition it does have residential units occupied by staff.A
covered outdoor patio area was removed to facilitate the building addition.A new private
covered patio area of 258 SF(14'-2"x 18'-4")is being added. It is contiguous with the new
dining space in the addition.
G.Additional Requirements for Single-Family Attached Dwelling Units
The project does not fall under this designation.
PAGE 2 OF 3
Hennebery Eddy
Architects
18.610.040 Special Requirements for Development Bordering Urban Plaza
Project does not border an urban plaza.
18.610.045 Exceptions to Standards
The project isn't seeking any exceptions to the Standards.
18.610.050 Building and Site Design Objectives(To Be Used With Track 3 Approval Process)
Project is not following a Track 3 Approval Process.
PAGE 3 OF 3
Clean Water Services File Number
C1eanWaterr Services 14-000925
Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment
1. Jurisdiction: Tigard
2. Property Information (example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information
Tax lot ID(s): Name: TVF&R
2S102AD01900 Company: TVF&R
Address: 11945 SW 70th Ave
Site Address: 8935 SW Burnham Street City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223
City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 Phone/Fax: 503-649-8577
Nearest Cross Street: Ash E-Mail:
4. Development Activity (check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information
❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Ian Gelbrich
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: Hennabery Eddy Architects, Inc.
❑ Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 921 SW Washington Street Suite 250
❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision
Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial
City, State,Zip: Portland,OR 97205
Other Phone/Fax: 503-227-4860
E Mail: IGelbrich @henneberyeddy.com
6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes I8)No ❑Unknown
Location and description of off-site work
7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project
Treatment via stormfilter CB
This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ
1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army
COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law.
By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority
to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify
that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate.
Print/Type Name Ian Gelbrich Print/Type Title Architect
ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 4/7/2014
FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY
❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report
may also be required.
al Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This
Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently
discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and
approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law.
❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially
sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water
quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order
07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law.
❑ This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached.
❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED.
Reviewed by c:/eez 'I Q ' Date 04/09/14
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone: (503)681-5100 • Fax.(503)681-4439 • www.cleanwaterservices.org
PRE -
APPLICATION
CONFERENCE
NOTES
CITY OF TIGARD
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD
PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 112 )1 14 m
STAFF AT PRE-APP.:
NON-RESIDENTIAL
APPLICANT: Ian Gelbrich AGENT:
Phone: 503-227-4860 Phone:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 8935 SW Burnham Street
TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S102AD01900
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Downtown Design Review Type I or II?
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Exterior improvements to existing building (roof& insulation),
926 sf addition, stormwater facility upgrades, sidewalk/pavement
replacement, replacement of landscaping & irrigation systems.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: MUCBD
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: MUCBD
ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.520)
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:N/A sq. ft. Average Min.lot width: N/A ft. Max. building height:20'min/80'max
Setbacks: Front: 0'min/20'max Side: 0 ft. Rear:5'min. Corner:0 ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 80%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:20%.
MINUMUM Building Frontage:50%
❑ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout)
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED
PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification
handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application
or the application will not be accepted.
* NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is
encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390)
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval
CITY OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application
incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria.
• IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050)
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways,
the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development.
For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City
standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and
affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of
real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to
the projected impacts of the development.
ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765)
Minimum number of accesses:One. Minimum access width:30'ft.
Minimum pavement width:24ft .
All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas:N/Aft.
® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030)
WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial
uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections
between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical,
walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments.
D. SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730)
➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of
➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary.
➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK.
0,SPEC1XL$UILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.)
BUILDI - G HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75
feet pr ided that:
• A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
• All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and
• The structure will not abut a residential zoned district.
® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745 & 18.620)
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR
VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires
landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of
width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also
achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required;
these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by
vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may
be found in the Development Code.
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are:
n/a feet along north boundary. n/a: feet along east boundary.
feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary.
IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:N/A.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS- 18.745.050E
Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In
no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming.
In addition, screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one
and two family dwellings.
® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.620)
STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND
PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be
determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the
number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way
whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted
according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance
with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further
information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas, including
parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the
parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual.
® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755)
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the
intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's
Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177.
® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) f
REQUIRED parking for this type of use:Emergency Services
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):3.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet(2.77 spaces x.75 = 2.0 spaces)
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS
COMPACT SPACES.
PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows:
► Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches.
■ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches.
Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space.
Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as
part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the
minimum percentage requirements.
HANDICAPPED PARKING:
■ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED
PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as
well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is
available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface
and an appropriate sign shall be posted.
► BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080)
Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be
provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
Z BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765)
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas rotect om automobile traffic and in convenient
locations.
REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of u :0.5 per 1,000square feet.
❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapt�e -18.775)--'
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE
GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based
on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their
boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly
indicated on plans submitted with the development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C)
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which
addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report
shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving
the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3)
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area.
Design Criteria:
The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the
required widths:
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED
TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25%
I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet
I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
-
♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres
♦ Natural lakes and ponds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25%
I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet
I >50 to<100 acres 50 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25-
♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope),
♦ Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine6
4Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average
high watcr for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated
corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement.
5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any
materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality
protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the C[VS Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Vegetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for
separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not
be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
CWS Service Provider Letter:
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter
which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If
there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter staling a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required.
® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780)
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard.
A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code
standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application.
Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review.
> Signs shall comply with 18.610.055
® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements"
Brochure)
AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT:
Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review (Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II);
Planned Development (Type III);Sensitive Lands Review(Type II and III); Site Development Review(Type II);
and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped
architect.
Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 25% (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees
with mature canopy cover areas)
Percentage of mature canopy cover required per lot in R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5&R-7: 15%
An urban forestry plan shall:
- Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person
possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist);
- Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry
Manual;
- Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and
- Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual.
TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall
provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban
Forestry Manual.
18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option
In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover
required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a
discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify
an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part
of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another
chapter in this title.
•
® PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.)
To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or
more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The
flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of
the site.
Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on
their existing canopy area.Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements.
® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795)
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8)
FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear
vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear
vision area.
® ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060)
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots
created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access
easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel
is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
CODE CHAPTERS
❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loadirg Requirements)
❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review)
❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(signs)
❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits)
❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan)
❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(visual Clearance Areas)
® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities)
❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)
❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay)
❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits)
❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards)
® 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations)
❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage)
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
Unable to determine whether a Type I or Type II approval is required based on submittal. If proposal does not
modify more than 15% of on-site landscaping, with no reduction than the proposal is a Type II. With a Type I, the
following checked sections do not apply: Impact Study,Access,Landscaping and Screening, and Urban Forestry Plan.
Applicant shall address criteria in TDC 18.620.020, .025, .030 and .060 in the narrative.
PROCEDURE
Z Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the
proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted
y mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The
Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM.
Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One.81/2" x 11" map of
a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision.
Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will
determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the
applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is
accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or
requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the
Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land
use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which
illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less
than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective
applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
BUILDING PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building
Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These
pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or
modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to
determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as
proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has
system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when
the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building
permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT
THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
PLEASE NOTE:
The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning
that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information
required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is
recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development
Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an
application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: Agnes Kowacz
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
PHONE:503-718-2421 FAX: 503-598-1960 DIRECT:503-718-2427 EMAIL: agnesk @tigard-or.gov
TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES .'
> DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
Citi MINIM MIN
Community Deveropment
Shaping)1(Better Community
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maptsl: 2S102AD TVFSR
Tax Lobs]: 1900
Use Type: Station remodel/addition
These notes have been prepared based on the information submitted by the applicant showing a
proposed renovation and 962-sf addition to the existing fire station at 8935 SW Burnham St.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the
application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that
may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
❑ No ROW dedication requirement is anticipated
❑ a
Street improvements: (Subject to rough proportionality)
I Partial street improvements and/or future street improvement agreements (where allowed) will
be necessary along to include:
❑ feet of pavement from face of curb to centerline
LI concrete curb
111 _-foot planter exclusive of curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other: Pavement tapers
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appllcatfon Conterence Notes Paget 015
Development Engineering
Public street improvements are not anticipated to be required.
It appears that the development's trip generation will be below the threshold for requiring a traffic study.
18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance
from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street
having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation
plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus
one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map.
This appears to not be applicable
Agreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may
be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City
Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible
for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) This appears to not be applicable
(2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent
to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of
undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite
side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of
street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
The existing utilities along Burnham St are already underground. Any new utilities must be placed
underground.
Sanitary Sewers:
The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer.
The existing site is connected to sanitary sewer. The proposed changes would not be anticipated to result in
significant changes to sewer usage, so no sewer work is anticipated to be required.
Water Supply:
The City of Tigard Public Works Department provides public water service in this area. Coordinate with
the City of Tigard for information regarding adequate water supply and appropriate connection fees for
the proposed development.
The existing site is connected to water. The proposed changes would not be anticipated to result in significant
changes to water usage, so no water work is anticipated to be required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5
Development Engineering
• Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection
services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the
adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to
an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that
the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed.
Storm drainage must connect to a public system of adequate capacity or discharge to a suitable outfall
location meeting appropriate standards (such as CWS). The applicant will need to demonstrate how
this proposal meets CWS standards. Storm water detention may be required depending on the area of
new impervious surface. The applicant is advised to keep the area of new impervious surface below
1,000sf.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution
contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility
provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-
lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces
created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the
current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted
with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
fl Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Water quality treatment may be required depending on the area of new impervious surface.
Calculations for sizing of water quality treatment facilities must be submitted to the Development
Engineer for review and approval. Water quality facilities also must be reviewed and approved by the
city. Review and comply with provisions of Chapter 4 Clean Water Services Design and Construction
Standards (Runoff Treatment and Control).
The applicant is advised to keep the area of new impervious surface below 1,000sf.
Other Comments:
Water quality and detention facility design and construction must be certified by a professional engineer
as meeting Clean Water Services requirements. After completion of the construction of these facilities,
the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for long-term
maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and city staff will be periodically
inspecting the facilities for compliance with the terms of the agreement.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5
Development Engineering
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAK
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in
2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program
collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's
transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips
which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates
the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at
the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to
be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is
permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single-family home.
Pay TDT as required.
PERMITS
Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development
Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit
Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line
extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be
submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality
and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where
professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PH Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Budding Division.
A PFI permit may be required for this project. This permit (if required) must be obtained before any
work begins on site.
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation
material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is
issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5
Development Engineering
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It
covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading,
etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are
substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant
to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required,
and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and
plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more
information.
PREPARED BY: Mike McCarthy 1/28/14
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DATE
Phone: (503)718-2462
E-mail: mikem@tigard-or.gov
Revised: March 2012
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5
Development Engineering
Agnes Kowacz
From: Ian Gelbrich <IGelbrich @henneberyeddy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:41 PM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Cc: Michelle Vo
Subject: RE:TVF&R Addition - Bike Parking
Attachments: IMG_3886.JPG
Agnes,
The bicycle parking has two relocated bicycle racks and 1 additional rack, each accommodating two bicycles. This would
get us to our required 6 spaces. Attached is a photo of the existing racks we're proposing to match to.The spaces are
located within 50'-0" of the Community Room entrance which will receive the majority of public traffic.The spaces are
not located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways, and are located within view of Burnham St. Cover
will not be provided as part of this project.The surface will be concrete.
Ian
Ian Gelbrich AIA
Hennebery Eddy Architects,Inc.
503 227 4860 TEL
971 200 7230 DIRECT
This message may contain confidential communications and/or privileged information. If you have received it in error,please delete it and notify the sender
From: Agnes Kowacz [mailto:AgnesK@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 6:58 AM
To: Ian Gelbrich
Subject: RE: TVF&R Addition
Ian-
Thank you for the quick reply. I need more details on the bicycle parking. In terms of showing what the racks look like
and addressing the requirements of 18.765.050. Is the bike parking just relocated or is it new?Also, since there is some
landscaping being altered; what is the before and after landscaping area after the modification (you just state that there
is no reduction)?Thanks,
Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
503.718.2427
agnesk @tigard-or.gov
From: Ian Gelbrich [mailto:IGelbrich @henneberveddv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:21 PM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Cc: Michelle Vo
Subject: RE: TVF&R Addition
1
Agnes, the civil site plan C100 should show the existing parking spaces should be shown on the drawing C100 of the
packet. C101 should show the location of the bicycle parking on the upper left at the entrance to the community room.
The existing building SF is 9,729 SF and the addition is 996 SF. My apologies if that's not clear in the proposal letter.
Ian Gelbrich AIA
Hennebery Eddy Architects,Inc.
503 227 4860 TEL
971 200 7230 DIRECT
This message may contain confidential communications and/or privileged information, If you have received it in error,please delete it and notify the sender
From: Agnes Kowacz [mailto:AgnesK@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:59 PM
To: Ian Gelbrich
Subject: TVF&R Addition
Ian-
I am looking over your application and need clarification on a few items:
What is the current square footage of the building? How many square feet is the addition?We also need a site plan that
shows the existing parking spaces(24). Where will the bike parking be added and how does it meet the requirements of
18.765.050.
Thanks,
Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
503.718.2427
agnesk@tigard-or.gov
DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail
may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained
by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule."
2
Agnes Kowacz
From: Ian Gelbrich <IGelbrich @henneberyeddy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:25 PM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Cc: Michelle Vo
Subject: RE:TVF&R Addition - Window
Attachments: TVFR 51 A302.pdf; SW View.pdf
Agnes,
I wasn't addressing the window section because it was an addition to the existing building, so I felt it fell under the same
exclusions as for setbacks.
As part of this addition, we are not reducing the street facing windows of the existing building.The addition is of a
residential nature. We've located the exterior patio space closest to the street, which is enclosed with a 40%open wall
with light screening.The opening's here have a recess of 13".The wall to the actual building is behind the screen and
matches the screen wall opening with 70%glazing. I've attached a copy of the enlarged elevations in case that wasn't
included in the package.The elevation of the street facing residential wall is drawings 6/A302. I've also attached a copy
of the rendering.
There is no upper floor as part of the addition.
Ian
Ian Gelbrich A1A
Hennebery Eddy Architects,Inc.
503 227 4860 TEL
971 200 7230 DIRECT
This message may contain confidential communications and/or privileged information. If you have received it in error,please delete it and notify the sender
From: Agnes Kowacz [mailto:AgnesK@tigard-or.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:24 PM
To: Ian Gelbrich
Subject: FW: TVF&R Addition
Ian-
I also noticed that you did not address the windows section pertaining to the addition. Please address each section
listed in 18.610.030.A.3.a-d in respect to the addition.Thanks,
Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
503.718.2427
agnesk @tigard-or.gov
-
....., ....i. • ,,,....,,.. . .._ ... . ,. . .: . ,..... ....„.4-1.1 z , ..., .....4, ..,...,... :.. .
‘.1. • : ....4,,, . .., • ,.. .. :. %, . .a.s...i . ,.. . ., ,.,......., ,,,,,, : _
„ .• , ..._.•,.:...• ,.: •,,, , : • %(0/-.; ‘• -• -4' ..-'
ir.itilk,4.
lif
•
•
•
•
•
allillit'
W1141t www.tvfr.com
Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue
April 24, 2014
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard OR 97223
Re: TVF&R Station 51
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development
project. Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue endorses this proposal.
If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504.
Sincerely,
A-41 farY4(
John Wolff
Deputy Fire Marshal
Copy: TVF&R File
North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center
20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 7401 SW Washo Court 12400 SW Tonquin Road
Aloha,Oregon 97007-1042 11945 SW 70th Avenue Tualatin,Oregon 97062-8350 Sherwood,Oregon 97140-9734
503-259-1400 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196
503-259-1500 503-259-1600
503-649-8577
Agnes Kowacz
From: Mike McCarthy
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:42 PM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Subject: DDR 14-02 TVF&R Station on Burnham St
Attachments: Mike McCarthy P E .vcf
Hi Agnes,
We have reviewed this case for a minor remodel/minor addition to the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue station on
Burnham St and determined the following:
The additional impervious area would be less than 1,000sf
The disturbed existing impervious area would be less than 1,000sf
This proposal would not be anticipated to result in any significant increase in traffic volume or water/sewer usage.
Therefore, we have no comments or requirements on this proposal.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike McCarthy P.E.
City of Tigard
Senior Project Engineer
• Streets and Transportation
13125 SW Hall Blvd
T I G A!t 17 Tigard,OR 97223
(503)718-2462 Direct
(503)624-0752 Fax
mikem etigard-or.goy
DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail
may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained
by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule."
1