Loading...
PDR2013-00003 PDR2O13 - 00003 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 DATE OF FILING: 2/4/2014 DATE MAILED: 2/4/2014 CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2014-01 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2013-00003 Case Name: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION Applicant's Name/Address: PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road.Suite 300 Portland, OR 97222 Owner's Name/Address: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust. 2001 SE 10t Street. Mail Stop 5570. Bentonville, AR 72716-5570 Address of Property: 7600 SW Dartmouth Road.Tigard.OR 97223 Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington Co. Tax Assessor's Map No. 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200, 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101;and 2S101AB,Tax Lot 01400. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 27. 2014 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS,FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: ➢ The applicant requested a minor modification to the approved T*ard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001).The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001),which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. On January 27,2014, the Commission approved modifications to the Detailed Plan, subject to conditions of approval within this final order. Zone: C-G: General Commercial District with PD: Planned Development Overlay Zone. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755, and 18.790. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © Interested Parties © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard Permit Center at City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 4,2014 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 21, 2014 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390..040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 20, 2014. —� Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 718-2434. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2014-01 PC PLANNING COMMISSION -05 FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR MINOR MODIFICATION OF DETAILED PLANS FOR THE TIGARD RETAIL CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/PDR2008-00001 (COMMISSION'S FINAL ORDER NO. 2009-02 PC). THE MODIFICATIONS WOULD ADD A 1,356 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING OUTDOOR RECYCLING STORAGE AREA TO THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE BEHIND THE WAL-MART BUILDING. THE COMMISSION HEARD AND APPROVED THE REQUEST AT ITS JANUARY 27, 2014 HEARING. THE PLANNING COMMISSION BASED ITS DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE AND PLAN SET (TIGARD RETAIL CENTER, OUTSIDE RECYCLING STORAGE AREA, UPDATED DECEMBER 11, 2013), THE STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION,AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE HEARING. 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION CASE NO.: Planned Development Review(PDR) PDR2013-00003 (Minor Modification) APPLICANT: PACLAND OWNER: Wal-Mart Real Estate 6400 SE Lake Road,Suite 300 Business Trust Portland,OR 97222 2001 SE 10th Street Mail Stop 5570 Bentonville,AR 72716-5570 REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building(Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001),which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street west of SW 72nd Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 15136CD, Tax Lot 04200; 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101;and 2S101AB,Tax Lot 01400. TIGARD MODIFICATION DR20] ► NO.] ] 11 ARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFI.AT] (I' 3-O(KIl 3)PC FINAL NO 40 PC PAGE 1 OF ZONES/ COMP PLAN DESIGNATIONS: C-G (PD): General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on dle same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. (PD): The property has a planned development overlay designation. The purposes of the planned development overlay zone are: 1) To provide a means for property development that is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan through the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the City; 2) To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal,and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; 3) To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits, while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning; 4) To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, water resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation of alternatives, conceptual review, then detailed review) that can relate the type and design of a development to a particular site; 5) To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of density requirements,which will balance the interests of the owner, developer, neighbors, and the City; and 6) To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainable and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed- use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and- ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle,it is still important to 1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible; and 2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate intra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. The zone may be applied elsewhere in the City through the legislative process. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755,and 18.790. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 2 OF 11 SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed addition of the recycling storage area meets the applicable approval criteria of the Tigard Community Development Code and to ensure compliance imposed certain conditions of approval so that the proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, the Planning Commission APPROVES the requested Land Use Application subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE/BUILDING PERMIT. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher 503-639-4171, EXT 2434. 1. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a statement that truck service to, from, and inclusive of idling at the recycling facility will be restricted to 7am to 6pm—daylight hours. 2. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a statement that all materials placed within the recycling enclosure will be stacked no higher than the top of the recycling facility screen (10 feet). 3. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a rodent/pest control plan for the store and loading/unloading area. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The subject site has been subject to a number of development proposals since the 1990s. Recently, the Planning Commission approved the Tigard Retail Center Detailed Plan (PDR2008-00001) with Final Order No. 2009-02 PC, effective June 17, 2009. The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site. A subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001) approved under Final Order No. 2010-01 removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. The site is currently under construction by Wal-Mart. Vicinity Information The subject 18.16-acre property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street, west of SW 72nd Avenue, and east of Hwy 217 in the Tigard Triangle (see Attachment 1). The subject site, zoned primarily C-G (PD) with a 0.45 acre parcel in the southeast corner zoned MUE, is surrounded on the north, west and east by C-G (PD) zoned land, and on the southeast by land zoned MUE. A 10.42-acre significant wetland associated with Red Rock Creek is located adjacent to the site on the west which buffers Hwy 217. Vacant developable land exists to the east fronting on SW 72"`x, which was once a part of the previous approvals on the subject site. The area to the southeast, zoned MUE, is a neighborhood in transition where a number of residences have converted to commercial uses. Proposal Description The applicant requests approval for a minor modification to the approved planned development detail plan as shown in the Revised Detailed Development Plan, Sheet PC-1.0 (see Attachment 2). The proposed modification would add a 12' x 113' (1,356 square feet) outdoor recycling storage area at the rear of the site (see Attachment 3). The area would be contained within a 10' tall CMU screen wall 'I'IG.ARD RI"I':1❑.CI•:N1'FR NIOD11 IC.A77ON(Pmum NMI3)PC FINAL ORDER NO.1401 PC 1'.0 GE 3 or 11 and would support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, the facility will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposal would otherwise be consistent with the previously approved plan. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain predominantly discretionary approval criteria. Type III?PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to the City Council. As the proposal is a modification of Planning Commission Order No. 2009-02, the appropriate review is through the Type III-PC hearing process, pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050. SECTION V. NOTICE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENT The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity to provide written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. On December 31, 2013 the City mailed notice to neighbors within 500 feet and other interested parties. On January 11, 2014, staff posted the subject site with a notice. In addition, the January 9th edition of The Times included a notice of the Planning Commission hearing. Staff received two written comments from adjacent businesses: Bob Davidson, Minute Man Press at 7555 SW Hermoso Way (see Attachment 4) and Robert L Stacy, CPA at 7540 Hermoso Way (see Attachment 5) asking for clarification on the proposal with respect to the type of recycling activity and the adequacy of screening. SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The applicable review criteria for the proposed addition of a recycling storage area are contained in the following Community Development Code Chapters: 18.350, Planned Developments; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.620, Tigard Triangle Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage; and 18.790 Urban Forestry. Unless otherwise noted in the findings for these code sections below, the project is consistent with the approved 2010 Tigard Retail Center application (PC Order No.2010-01 PDR2010-0001). Pursuant to T i g a r d Development Code 18.390.050.E.1, "Approval or denial of a . . . Type III action shall be based on standards and criteria, which shall be set forth in the development ordinance, and which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit application to the development ordinance. . ." This staff report to the Planning Commission is limited to the review of the code sections cited above and contains a staff recommendation for the Commission's review and decision on the proposed modification. 18.350— 'LANNED DEVELOPMENTS 18.350.060 Compliance with specific development standards. The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance with base zone provisions,with the following modifications: 1. Lot dimensional standards. 2. Site coverage. 3. Building height. 4. Structure setback provisions: 5.All other provision of the base zone shall apply except as modified by this chapter. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR 013-0$J03)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 4 OF 11 No modifications to the base zone development standards have been requested with this minor modification application or with the original application approving the Tigard Retail Center. The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan, and continues to meet standards of the base zone provisions as described in the applicant's narrative and the finding in this staff report,below,in 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts. 18.350.070.A Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if all the following applicable criteria are met: 18.350.070.A.1 The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan. Minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; There is no residential component to the approved plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the lot coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in lot coverage through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement"bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. Parking is unaffected in the area where the storage area is proposed.This criterion is met. b. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; As described above,the net landscaping is approximately 0.6%greater than the approved detail plan. The amount of landscaping will not be reduced with the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The change involves a change in use; The proposed recycling storage area is an accessory use to the permitted retail use. No change of use is proposed.This criterion is met. d. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard; and The location of the proposed recycling area is between the perimeter service access road and the water quality swale at the south edge of the property. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. In addition, the proposed storage area is located approximately 30 feet north of the significant wetland buffer, or 80 feet north of the wetland itself. The proposed modification does not commit land to development that is environmentally sensitive of subject to a potential hazard.This criterion is met. e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. The proposed modification will not affect the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, or other site improvements of the approved plan. As mentioned under criterion (a) above, there will be a 0.5% net coverage decrease with the addition of the proposed recycling storage area and a consequent 0.5%increase in landscaping.The proposed change is minor.This criterion is met. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 5 OF 11 FINDING: As shown in the above analysis, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan does not make the modified detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan. The detailed plan would remain generally consistent with the concept plan and can be approved. 18.350.070.4.b.(1) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between single-family and multi-family residential, and residential and commercial uses; The only adjacent property with a different type of land use is located to the southeast corner of the development. Although the adjacent property is zoned MUE which allows similar commercial use, the existing use of the noted property is residential. The approved detailed development plan provides a 20'buffer between any hard surface improvements or structures (pedestrian path) and the existing residential use of the property. The proposed recycling storage area is approximately 120 feet from the adjacent property to the southeast. According to the Buffer Matrix, Table 18.745.1&2, only a 10 foot buffer is required. The buffer will consist of groundcover, shrubs, trees, and hedges per the Buffer Matrix requirements and as shown on the approved plans (Sheet L-1b, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). This standard is met. 18.350.070.4.b.(3) On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: a) What needs to be screened; b) The direction from which it is needed; and c)Whether the screening needs to be year-round. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located approximately 100' from the adjacent property to the south, and approximately 120' from adjacent property to the southeast. In addition to the 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall, significant landscaping will be planted in the area between the property line and the outdoor recycling storage area (Sheet L-lb, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). The landscape trees in these areas will include evergreen trees that will provide additional screening year-round. The combination of the 10-ft high CMU screen wall, the landscaping with evergreen trees, as well as the distance of the outdoor recycling storage area from the property line,will provide adequate screening from the adjacent properties. This standard is met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan is generally consistent with the approved concept plan and may be approved. Buffering and screening approved with the detailed plan exceed the requirements in the code and together with the proposed 10-foot high CMU screening wall, will satisfactorily buffer and screen the proposed recycling storage area. The applicable planned development standards and approval criteria are met. 18.520— COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.520.040 Development Standards A. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370; The subject site is primarily zoned C-G(PD) with a small portion zoned MUE in the southeast corner adjacent to Hermoso Way. The proposed recycling area is located in the C-G(PD) zoned portion of the property. General retail use is permitted outright in both the C-G and MUE zones and the proposed storage area is an accessory use to the approved retail use and is therefore also a TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR20 1 3-0000 3)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 6 OF 11 permitted use. The proposed modification is subject to the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district as reviewed below. The applicant has not obtained or requested any variances or adjustments. 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. All other applicable standards and requirements, as reviewed in this staff report,are met. B. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.502.2. The standards in Table 18.502.2 applicable to the proposed recycling storage area include: STANDARDS C-G (PD) Approved Proposed Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 0 ft - 100ft. 100 ft. Maximum Site Coverage (PD): 85% 80% 67.0% 66.4% Minimum Landscaping (PD): 15% 20% 33% 33.6% The location of the proposed recycling storage area is in the rear yard approximately 100 feet from the southern property line approximately 30 feet closer than the approved store wall and loading dock screen wall. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8%decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. The proposed modification meets the applicable development standards for the C-G zone. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan with the addition of the 1,356 square foot recycling area meets the applicable Commercial Zoning District development standards. 18.620 — TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 18.620.040.A Building Design Standards All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance,is satisfied. 4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. FINDING: As shown in the applicant's plans and narrative, the material proposed for the 10- foot screen wall around the outdoor recycling storage area will be painted, split faced CMU (concrete masonry unit) block. Foundation materials below or within two feet of finish grade may be plain concrete or concrete block as allowed by this section. This applicable Tigard Triangle Design Standards are met. 18.755— IXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE : TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 7 OF 11 A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non- residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and I, the storage area must be able to accept at least all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. The approved development included indoor storage areas able to accept all "principal recyclable materials" (currently these materials include newspaper, ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, aluminum, container glass, office paper, and tin cans (OAR 340- 60-030)) for the operation of the approved Tigard Retail Center. The proposed outdoor recycling storage allows for additional management of materials to be recycled and/or re-used by Walmart. The applicant states that consistent with Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re- purposed,including items such as cardboard bales,wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposed modification exceeds the principle recyclable materials provision. This criterion is met. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. As noted in the approved 2008 application, the minimum standards method was used to adequately size the trash enclosures for the proposed retail pads for this site. The trash compactor for the anchor store building is based on typical building requirements of the anchor retailer. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on Walmart's typical requirements for being able to store materials that can be recycled and re-used. Walmart has an aggressive sustainability program which includes, among other things, the recycling and re-use of such things as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items are typically stored until such time that Walmart's delivery trucks return to the distribution center, at which time the stored items are loaded in the empty truck trailer and returned for re-use and/or recycling. Accordingly, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is not serviced by the typical franchised hauler and is only for Walmart's use. This storage area has been coordinated with the franchise hauler, Pride Disposal, who has indicated they have no objection to the outdoor recycling storage area. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area meets the minimum standards method of compliance. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance,described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. 11GARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-01X103)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 8 OF 11 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be collocated with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. As shown on the applicant's site plan (Sheet BP-1) the proposed exterior recycling storage area is located to the rear of Retail 3 (Walmart) and south of the access road. The area is adjaccnt to and central to the truck loading areas of the store. A 10-foot CMU screen wall is proposed to screen that area from adjacent commercial properties to the south. The applicable location standards are met. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed recycling area will meet Walmart's size requirements, have adequately addressed the Uniform Fire Code standards, and will be enclosed by a 10 foot high split CMU screening wall. The applicable design standards are met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Access to the storage area will not require backing out of a driveway onto a public street. Adequate turning radii are provided to allow collection vehicles to safely exit the site in a forward motion. The Tic;utD RF.T.-\Il.(:I;INTER\MODIFIC:ATION(PDR2013 4xx 03)PC FIN:\1.ORDER NO.14-01 PC 13.AG1:9 O1,11 proposed storage area will be serviced by Walmart or vendor trucks and not by the local franchise hauler. The applicable access standards are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed development complies with the applicable Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage standards. 18.790— (Urban Fotimemoummi 18.790.020 states the requirements of this chapter apply to planned development (Type III) land use reviews. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The proposed modification to the site plan to include an outdoor recycling storage area is minor and is substantially similar to the approved site plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the project will not increase the previously approved site impervious area and therefore will not impact the open soil volume available to implement the approved landscaping plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the landscaping plan previously approved for the Target store and as coordinated with city staff during the site permitting review process will continue to provide approximately 38% effective tree canopy coverage for the site, in excess of the 33% minimum required for the C-G zone. The effective canopy area only takes into account trees that, at the time of planting,will meet the city s minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirement. It does not include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees that will be planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. The 33% canopy coverage requirement for the entire site is met with the minor modification for the outdoor recycling storage area. The applicable Urban Forestry standards are met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Development Review Engineer commented that the proposed location of the recycling area may conflict with the full function of the adjacent detention pond. The applicant responded that no changes to the approved stormwater management system are proposed with this application. No additional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project since the overall impervious area of the site decreased from what was previously approved with the Target project. The proposed storage area is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. The drainage report, dated August 2008, submitted with the Target application provided a summary of the pond stage for various storm events. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 10 OF 11 SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified of the proposed modification and indicated that a required minimum clearance of 30ft must be maintained between the storage area and the exterior door on the south wall of the building in order to comply with Chapter 34 of the NFP1 Fire Code. The applicant responded that it is anticipated that a maximum of 150 wood pallets would be stored within the recycling storage area at any given time, and has demonstrated on the site plan (Sheet BP-1) that the proposed storage area is located a minimum of 30ft away from this exterior door. Attachments: 1 Vicinity Map 2 Revised Detailed Development Plan (PC-1.0) 3 Proposed Outdoor Storage Area (BP-1) 4 Written Comment: Bob Davidson 5 Written Comment:Robert Stacy SECTION IX. CONCLUSION The City of Tigard Planning Commission has APPROVED with conditions of approval, Planned Development Review (PDR2013-00003) —TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION. At its January 27, 2014 hearing of the proposal, the Planning Commission's motion to approve included certain conditions of approval that the Commission found warranted based on testimony from adjacent property owners'concerns for potential off-site impacts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE APPLICANT AND ALL PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS BE NOTIFIED OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. PASSED: THE 27TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. \, Jason Rogers,Planning Commission President Dated this Lf day of February,2014. I:\CURPLN\Gary\Site Development and PD\PDR2D13-OO003(Tigard Retail Center Modification)\PDR2014011001 PC Final Order.docx TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013d0103)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 11 OF 11 t i VICINITY MAP PDR2O13-00003 • Tigard Retail Center . Walmart Recycling Facility 404 ••v••7R•�•i• i ►.•••C•fi•t 44 •*•s3•• i ��O t F N r••••. A t !••••• . .� • ' st. q• • • d *• •► • •• 4. ♦*•• ••• ••••• w" ' ..•♦•► :.)",.. ■•••••••••••••Q•••••+•+.+4,••••...........•.,4„...••i t • , Subject Site "-- ,;„,?-44,• ,.,. ..,`„ .,.••.••♦••••••••4•••••••+i••:.. . �%W.:•***to okyie 0 * :04 ,_, ........•,,,_. ...„. ►•a•• • •• ••••;• ti 140 �. ►••• •••�•i•• •••••t•• •••4141 1•11‘ •• ►••* •••�•••••••••••••• •a •••.•4►u —, 17111∎44•1 i i•••44Pe"•••4AI.••9"`+iii ►*�i4••i•••:•i i•+1•••••�••••i�I NV i 1.41 4t iv••%•ii ver i+'i••••••1;i ►'• 7 e f:�lei ir C WA V :17 - dj 1 e No_�'� Information nan rN. w for Nn.1r Meaaon F ' DaMo�na NiN s�inteas OINilen� Approx.Scala 1:4.000.1 In:333 R :'�: � �/ l.1;N D te-.7.,. ] Map pnrxa0 at 01:11 PM c, 17-0w13 fial" a —I Feet 1 tTia d OR 97'23 • n soa Si 6311171 E WM/0 WNW M wrn..wpra« ,, ,q, Z J — , JI I f SITE DATA BUILDING DATA r R.1 woo 4t " r Ir I PA= AEA WAIL] .."" `. t '!��� 1 f RE.1 am 1 is:.cs PSI*a u]�mo si -"� 11 RE.L¢i1m' zs].C: DILL SUM MLA M•.fm 4: rnmB.mlm f R„'rt s IxM et r �\t1t °^°�^ C-G ZONE �� M E ZONE w.Res , 1° °a wPU, PARKING DATA 4 `..: —AR.wss[.RM ' ' co.a. *L) (MIXED USE I EMPLOYMENT) n4 I (ILBm DO.uae.M[.) i - ' ( NOTES s,woc sous w sr.us ~// , �` Ppl[.n4 row "F tiT 145' 1 BSA.IRSID SR 9Aa,F.R..No 1.4/.LT 51415 ST,. 1(! , V�• 1 s°OSa.c SAM Mk a NW IulArto e¢szaE SLAW s s]Mls ✓`� I..: :a - . `` .� eGSS Locum --- � LI,N.rill R. Ti4l3 .V f __- s RRRIU RAM SA]/,Am Si 11-I _�: -' � f� •`` NE.1 CLRO SEi BUMS MA) AMC OAN NOES SM.%51415 S,HALLS . '' 1 AU SS..,IWS BASSO E d TOTAL mVel SiwLS I S,wli ...i bn j ACCESS.STALLS S T'Ml5 + .nL FRR 601891712,u 31SU. ,O4 '.ti/ti ; { C1 t;I zmO L I I 1 , ,,aEM WA a OM wM,Owazo.M 9101111111711 N uaE RoM» sseAi it us wu ].Ch RaEleO IMRRC LORRAI S1MIS f r S 3 / I R i i I R}4 4 ^<e. Ml Ng.6'G MLM RNQ WIN r===14711711:1 /// r_ I •-` ,H .�'. T Y RAUt PRM.Cr 4.,5 d PRS[Rh ER4 Y Mi.M.0 RAM 107 COO 4]SI4t5 L i !1 lI • I I III •,•,I r N < ..lira sm'acwm:.F9rcn 9014 Vx V12 51415 .Nn.oao s R.no / �"'- E Y _ ! S,aLT wr COPY„M T( [ we i 1 -l; ...I.I'. �� ' r Pma,mM nMaRm rd vs.n n.us ME PAN ! O"� �.LEA y i �` _ ra _ �o. o f LEGiEPD i r I �� L ',� '' ' `I I'I f�!—y .: r�PRavaso lMO.O (` p,4��� I woes Rw3 a mom !' al / `.-+.. � ' .I I KII I �II '�.IJ, -I,i,_ la _ RJiRh 1M e M..) t y ar M , P[l.s P.N.A;srwa PER R1w-.- °'t e' '� CI /% >>C ' ! Yom: I 1 MAN9 n woo,I,M9MG STA,Pm RO.Nwom 1� A k'•. ��Sp.(.,...��..rAY.rPr L.iI II-4 • • �N�,woe o.4.P.�L, • �- -,�' _ ,,, 'PnO�AIQS , �t� :$1FM �v'd4 PMMER[.,.MRwGS moms• 1�l Y 1 •a 'I'' = .` ►+M'M hi SASH Up PACWh,, `� s:R«L f1N•4• ri 1' '� •�. IF ■ 3 _-.w FnnlEn I r 1 LOT 3 Pj , , 1 I la - - 1 , Y. Pao I r' / E:':-�:I Nnwl BF. /I V .r i J 11Valmart II MD/NLL _P ® °mE51LM PJS.S + 41}Mw � EaLRER BY 0010.. ' ) ' v.Rm 17 norm Irons RnnRl wpm )ta LvRM,P.M ER.1mm r f 1in -"7414, lnaa rRA wF lr E.0 roeM Nu` f t +., I IMI,."' MJE ZONE _SPACES R III ] (MIXED USE J - mM I _.. \I EMPLOYMENT) a _ Pwt mart - r nr. C till . . = tC j il -- r rP . Mrto F a ` LOT 1" .."*s r- `` M� I ' ' I� NI / Ic - C L ' rK., -� I I .1.RI. 1 \,„. gun ea • '--."'''..6, \ ;'''.I;'1::1;71.1'ilh.111 %MEC 4....... I . *NM m. r l R R}®AL 1, k rM. a ., 1,-04 1 D 0 GRAPHIC SCASJ Z M Z N • A TIGARD RETAIL CENTER DETAILED December 2013 Tigard,Oregon PC•1 MO DEVELOPIuENT PLAN 9 I 10 11 12 13 I 14 j 15 16 I 17 o- 1 —lip oiqu --1---, 1 \ . . _.> NIII:\\ . .._ .7_ , \ > .; ---,--,:,w; J i ..—. \-, \\-\:.\..._ .., .,,;:ssw .■., .X*,..,,,\ g .. ' ‘,4 sz.,:.::,..... .,„.„:,....:„. .,. .. \\\\\- --'----. I'•1��•►♦•„11, /1 iii -.''''':-.,'-%"'''::::'''-14(:� :_ -:∎:: -_-- �.4k t "r 4i, :❖.•. _ . ---=---� -- ; - PROPOSED 12'x113'OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA V 11•♦'RP ' ♦�1 :, ►, I i Ir;, , ' , \; ,1::: \ W/1CFT NIGH SCREEN WALLS OVER .•I -.11.,:♦'' ,A ..4 A I 1 Y- •► PIALE 1 1 I APPROMMATE 4FT RETAINING WAIL � ♦.r♦401. i I. 7 :i' ►i tt 1 I I - 1 ' "'• *AL♦40A .4I� I , I 1 i AM' I:,.;.; 7. , I 1 '..... i❖ : ' 1 / � i 100-1R STORY EVENT POND STAGE LEIEL AT 1:::i:VI' I 1 .--'":_/ /, /:':; ELEVATION 175.02 FT.THE STORAGE FACILITY IS r •••••. i I f -;;,,,p, LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE FUNCTIONAL Ii•••••• 1 I !�� 6 ,• , I CAPACITY OF 1NE DETENTION FACILITY. 1P i icir"' ti J/ .' ..:':•a• PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA SCALE 1' =20' CITY OF TIGARD Approved ( I Conditionally Approved ( x' I For only the work as detcribed in: PERMIT NO.rug.Zn13 'oCc..c i FANIA-4- ORDER- No 1.a(+(--°I ,1/4- See Letter to: Follow ( I Attach I I Job e By GQ 7R R. Date: 2 _ 1 Mill Walmart i�* #5935-00 PROPOSED OUTDOOR � 7600 SW DARTMOUTH ST STORAGE AREA BP-1 F�6594227 TIGARD,OR 97223 ATTACHMENT 3 Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Attachments: C70001268.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@tigard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (marty @tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that Wal-Mart is something of a "lightning rod"as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed, to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise, vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles (as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area,which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map & diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets,to cardboard recycling, to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/deli operation of the Wal-Mart. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 The problem with this, is that "behind" their building is in "front"full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view, they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle&can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects,especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides,or a fully enclosed building ?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax bob @mmptig.com 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday,January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE:Tigard Retail Center - Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012, well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months, with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note—I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day (a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos, they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at (503)620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, Robert L Stacy, CPA 1 ATTACHMENT 5 MEETING RECORDS . 6._. ?",4..i ipi " City of f Tigard TIGARD Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: January 27, 2014; 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7.00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7 0 p.m. 3. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS 7:01 p.m. 4. OFFICER ELECTION(S)7:02 p.m. 5. CONSIDER MINUTES 712 p.m. 6. PUBLIC HEARING—TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATIONS PDR2013-00003 715 p.m. 7. OTHER BUSINESS (COMMISSIONER INTRODUCTIONS) 815 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT 830 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA—JANUARY 27, 2014 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item: 6 Hearing Date:January 27,2014 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION CASE NO.: Planned Development Review (PDR) PDR2013-00003 (Minor Modification) APPLICANT: PACLAND OWNER: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business 6400 SE Lake Road, Trust Suite 300 2001 SE 10th Street Portland,OR 97222 Mail Stop 5570 Bentonville,AR 72716-5570 REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001),which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street west of SW 72nd Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200; 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101;and 2S101AB,Tax Lot 01400. ZONES/ COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: C-G (PD): General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. (PD): The property has a planned development overlay designation. The purposes of the planned development overlay zone are: 1) To provide a means for property development that is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan through the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the City; 2) To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal,and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of- strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; 3) To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the TIGARD Rl:'I'AII.CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-(1MK)3) PAGE 1 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION IIITARING 1/27/2014 housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits, while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning, 4) To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, water resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation of alternatives, conceptual review, then detailed review) that can relate the type and design of a development to a particular site; 5) To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of density requirements,which will balance the interests of the owner, developer, neighbors, and the City; and 6) To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainable and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed- use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5.This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and- ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle,it is still important to 1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible; and 2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate intra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. The zone may be applied elsewhere in the City through the legislative process. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755,and 18.790. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed minor mode icafit,n i"t'he' :approved Planned Development Detailed.Plr m I lalpkcable Approve Standards ;4141 ;16 this report.Therefore,Staff recommends APPROV the proposed Modifications.. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR20130(1003) PAGE 2 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The subject site has been subject to a number of development proposals since the 1990s. Recently, the Planning Commission approved the Tigard Retail Center Detailed Plan (PDR2008-00001) with Final Order No. 2009-02 PC, effective June 17, 2009. The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site. A subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001) approved under Final Order No. 2010-01 removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. The site is currently under construction by Wal-Mart. Vicinity Information The subject 18.16-acre property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street,west of SW 72"d Avenue, and east of Hwy 217 in the Tigard Triangle (see Attachment 1). The subject site, zoned primarily C-G (PD) with a 0.45 acre parcel in the southeast corner zoned MUE, is surrounded on the north, west and east by C-G (PD) zoned land, and on the southeast by land zoned MUE. A 10.42-acre significant wetland associated with Red Rock Creek is located adjacent to the site on the west which buffers Hwy 217. Vacant developable land exists to the east fronting on SW 72nd,which was once a part of the previous approvals on the subject site. The area to the southeast, zoned MUE, is a neighborhood in transition where a number of residences have converted to commercial uses. Proposal Description The applicant requests approval for a minor modification to the approved planned development detail plan as shown in the Revised Detailed Development Plan, Sheet PC-1.0 (see Attachment 2). The proposed modification would add a 12'x 113' (1,356 square feet) outdoor recycling storage area at the rear of the site (see Attachment 3). The area would be contained within a 10' tall CMU screen wall and would support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, the facility will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposal would otherwise be consistent with the previously approved plan. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain predominantly discretionary approval criteria. Type III PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to the City Council. As the proposal is a modification of Planning Commission Order No. 2009-02, the appropriate review is through the Type III-PC hearing process, pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050. SECTION V. NOTICE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENT The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity to provide written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. On December 31, 2013 the City mailed notice to neighbors within 500 feet and other interested parties. On January 11, 2014, staff posted the subject site with a notice. In addition, the January 9th edition of The Times included a notice of the Planning Commission hearing. Staff received two written comments from adjacent businesses: Bob Davidson, Minute Man Press at 7555 SW Hermoso Way (see Attachment 4) and Robert L Stacy, CPA at 7540 Hermoso Way (see Attachment 5) asking for clarification on the proposal with respect to the type of recycling activity and the adequacy of screening. '11GARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2OI3-00003) PAGE 3 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The applicable review criteria for the proposed addition of a recycling storage area are contained in the following Community Development Code Chapters: 18.350, Panned Developments; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.620, Tigard Triangle Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage; and 18.790 Urban Forestry. Unless otherwise noted in the findings for these code sections below, the project is consistent with the approved 2010 Tigard Retail Center application (PC Order No. 2010-01 PDR2010-0001). Pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050.E.1, "Approval or denial of a . . . Type III action shall be based on standards and criteria, which shall be set forth in the development ordinance, and which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit application to the development ordinance . . ." This staff report to the Planning Commission is limited to the review of the code sections cited above and contains a staff recommendation for the Commission's review and decision on the proposed modification. 18.350 — (PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS) 18.350.060 Compliance with specific development standards. The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance with base zone provisions,with the following modifications: 1. Lot dimensional standards. 2. Site coverage. 3. Building height. 4. Structure setback provisions: 5.All other provision of the base zone shall apply except as modified by this chapter. No modifications to the base zone development standards have been requested with this minor modification application or with the original application approving the Tigard Retail Center. The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan, and continues to meet standards of the base zone provisions as described in the applicant's narrative and the finding in this staff report, below,in 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts. 18.350.070.A Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if all the following applicable criteria are met: 18.350.070.A.1 The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan. Minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; There is no residential component to the approved plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. Parking is unaffected in the area where the storage area is proposed. This criterion is met. TIGARD RETAIL CI?NITR STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-1K11)03) PAGE 4 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 b. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; As described above,the net landscaping is approximately 0.6%greater than the approved detail plan. The amount of landscaping will not be reduced with the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The change involves a change in use; The proposed recycling storage area is an accessory use to the permitted retail use. No change of use is proposed. This criterion is met. d. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard; and The location of the proposed recycling area is between the perimeter service access road and the water quality swale at the south edge of the property. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. In addition, the proposed storage area is located approximately 30 feet north of the significant wetland buffer, or 80 feet north of the wetland itself. The proposed modification does not commit land to development that is environmentally sensitive of subject to a potential hazard. This criterion is met. e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. The proposed modification will not affect the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, or other site improvements of the approved plan. As mentioned under criterion (a) above, there will be a 0.5% net coverage decrease with the addition of the proposed recycling storage area and a consequent 0.5%increase in landscaping. The proposed change is minor. This criterion is met. FINDING: As shown in the above analysis, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan does not make the modified detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan. The detailed plan would remain generally consistent with the concept plan and can be approved. 18.350.070.4.b.(1) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between single-family and multi-family residential, and residential and commercial uses; The only adjacent property with a different type of land use is located to the southeast corner of the development. Although the adjacent property is zoned MUE which allows similar commercial use, the existing use of the noted property is residential. The approved detailed development plan provides a 20'buffer between any hard surface improvements or structures (pedestrian path) and the existing residential use of the property. The proposed recycling storage area is approximately-120 feet from the adjacent property to the southeast. According to the Buffer Matrix, Table 18.745.1&2, only a 10 foot buffer is required. The buffer will consist of groundcover, shrubs, trees, and hedges per the Buffer Matrix requirements and as shown on the approved plans (Sheet L-1b, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). This standard is met. 18.350.070.4.b.(3) On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: a) What needs to be screened; b) The direction from which it is needed; and c) Whether the screening needs to be year-round. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR201 3-0000 3) PAGE 5 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION IIFARING 1/27/2014 The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located approximately 100' from the adjacent property to the south, and approximately 120' from adjacent property to the southeast. In addition to the 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall, significant landscaping will be planted in the area between the property line and the outdoor recycling storage area (Sheet L-lb, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). The landscape trees in these areas will include evergreen trees that will provide additional screening year-round. The combination of the 10-ft high CMU screen wall, the landscaping with evergreen trees, as well as the distance of the outdoor recycling storage area from the property line,will provide adequate screening from the adjacent properties. This standard is met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan is generally consistent with the approved concept plan and may be approved. Buffering and screening approved with the detailed plan exceed the requirements in the code and together with the proposed 10-foot high CMU screening wall, will satisfactorily buffer and screen the proposed recycling storage area. The applicable planned development standards and approval criteria are met. 18.520 — (COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.520.040 Development Standards A.All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370; The subject site is primarily zoned C-G(PD) with a small portion zoned MUE in the southeast corner adjacent to Hermoso Way. The proposed recycling area is located in the C-G(PD) zoned portion of the property. General retail use is permitted outright in both the C-G and MUE zones and the proposed storage area is an accessory use to the approved retail use and is therefore also a permitted use. The proposed modification is subject to the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district as reviewed below. The applicant has not obtained or requested any variances or adjustments. 2.All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. All other applicable standards and requirements,as reviewed in this staff report,are met. B. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.502.2. The standards in Table 18.502.2 applicable to the proposed recycling storage area include: STANDARDS C-G (PD) Approved Proposed, Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 0 ft - 100ft. 100 ft. Maximum Site Coverage (PD): 85% 80% 67.0% 66.4% Minimum Landscaping (PD): 15% 20% 33% 33.6% The location of the proposed recycling storage area is in the rear yard approximately 100 feet from the southern property line approximately 30 feet closer than the approved store wall and loading dock screen wall. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-00003) PAGE 6 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 buffer areas of the site. The proposed modification meets the applicable development standards for the C-G zone. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan with the addition of the 1,356 square foot recycling area meets the applicable Commercial Zoning District development standards. 18.620— (TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS) 18.620.040.A Building Design Standards All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. FINDING: As shown in the applicant's plans and narrative, the material proposed for the 10- foot screen wall around the outdoor recycling storage area will be painted, split faced CMU (concrete masonry unit) block. Foundation materials below or within two feet of finish grade may be plain concrete or concrete block as allowed by this section. This applicable Tigard Triangle Design Standards are met. 18.755— (MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE): A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non- residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and I, the storage area must be able to accept at least all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. The approved development included indoor storage areas able to accept all "principal recyclable materials" (currently these materials include newspaper, ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, aluminum, container glass, office paper, and tin cans (OAR 340- 60-030)) for the operation of the approved Tigard Retail Center. The proposed outdoor recycling storage allows for additional management of materials to be recycled and/or re-used by Walmart. The applicant states that consistent with Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re- purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine 77GAR1)RI T:11L CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR21130(K)03) PAGE 7 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposed modification exceeds the principle recyclable materials provision.This criterion is met. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. As noted in the approved 2008 application, the minimum standards method was used to adequately size the trash enclosures for the proposed retail pads for this site. The trash compactor for the anchor store building is based on typical building requirements of the anchor retailer. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on Walmart's typical requirements for being able to store materials that can be recycled and re-used. Walmart has an aggressive sustainability program which includes, among other things, the recycling and re-use of such things as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items are typically stored until such time that Walmart's delivery trucks return to the distribution center, at which time the stored items are loaded in the empty truck trailer and returned for re-use and/or recycling. Accordingly, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is not serviced by the typical franchised hauler and is only for Walmart's use. This storage area has been coordinated with the franchise hauler, Pride Disposal, who has indicated they have no objection to the outdoor recycling storage area. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area meets the minimum standards method of compliance. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance, described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be collocated with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C,design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. As shown on the applicant's site plan (Sheet BP-1) the proposed exterior recycling storage area is located to the rear of Retail 3 (Walmart) and south of the access road. The area is adjacent to and central to the truck loading areas of the store. A 10-foot CMU screen wall is proposed to screen that area from adjacent commercial properties to the south. The applicable location standards are met. 1 IGARD RETAIL(INTER STAFF REPORT(PMR20 1 3-1 5 1110 3) PAGE 8 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed recycling area will meet Walmart's size requirements, have adequately addressed the Uniform Fire Code standards, and will be enclosed by a 10 foot high split CMU screening wall. The applicable design standards are met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Access to the storage area will not require backing out of a driveway onto a public street. Adequate turning radii are provided to allow collection vehicles to safely exit the site in a forward motion. The proposed storage area will be serviced by Walmart or vendor trucks and not by the local franchise hauler. The applicable access standards are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed development complies with the applicable Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage standards. 18.790— rban Forest : 18.790.020 states the requirements of this chapter apply to planned development (Type III) land use reviews. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The proposed modification to the site plan to include an outdoor recycling storage area is minor and is substantially similar to the approved site plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the project will not increase the previously approved site TIC.IRD RETAIL.CI:N'11R STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-00003) PAGE 9 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 impervious area and therefore will not impact the open soil volume available to implement the approved landscaping plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the landscaping plan previously approved for the Target store and as coordinated with city staff during the site permitting review process will continue to provide approximately 38% effective tree canopy coverage for the site, in excess of the 33% minimum required for the C-G zone. The effective canopy area only takes into account trees that, at the time of planting, will meet the city's minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirement. It does not include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees that will be planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. The 33% canopy coverage requirement for the entire site is met with the minor modification for the outdoor recycling storage area. The applicable Urban Forestry standards are met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Development Review Engineer commented that the proposed location of the recycling area may conflict with the full function of the adjacent detention pond. The applicant responded that no changes to the approved stormwater management system are proposed with this application. No additional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project since the overall impervious area of the site decreased from what was previously approved with the Target project. The proposed storage area is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. The drainage report, dated August 2008, submitted with the Target application provided a summary of the pond stage for various storm events. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level.As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified of the proposed modification and indicated that a required minimum clearance of 30ft must be maintained between the storage area and the exterior door on the south wall of the building in order to comply with Chapter 34 of the NFP1 Fire Code. The applicant responded that it is anticipated that a maximum of 150 wood pallets would be stored within the recycling storage area at any given time,and has demonstrated on the site plan (Sheet BP-1) that the proposed storage area is located a minimum of 30ft away from this exterior door. January 16.2014 PREPARED BY: ry Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner January 16,2014 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director Attachments: 1 Vicinity Map 2 Revised Detailed Development Plan (PC-1.0) 3 Proposed Outdoor Storage Area (BP-1) 4 Written Comment: Bob Davidson 5 Written Comment: Robert Stacy TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STMT REPORT(PDR2013-(X x103) PAGE 10 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 NON MAP PDR2013-00003 A !e. Tigard Retail Center Walmart Recycling Facility y e+ t ii $7.....K............4 i+ 40 •!' ♦♦ . 4. • • •♦ •4►•♦ ♦♦••.!. '' •••*v• •+••+••+ •. Subject Site• ••-,•_• •it•••♦.s,+f ..*r 14+1'0,•4•",•• Ail. .'s��►"••�. �• ♦�. • ••.. ••• `• * r t••••••••••••'•++••♦•+ �+• ► ∎•'••••••••s i+ ►.i , 7 ,:•;••••••••44V••••44%•..,••: A -J ►• '•'.+♦•. ••♦•♦+ •••'�IIF . , ,I 1 , r information on MN rnap is few general location Saralee,Division. ,I . . 1 .., , .V APPO.Solve 1'4.000-1 In a 333 R • EL A h 0 Map artist et 01:11 PM on 17-0ee-13 �tMlpZl POMPOMfeO1�j1e PPI0110POUPP►Mr@ Al l POMO J tiemFeoMeee� ur°AOr �yLOrunos iiiiiiiimeLa.I nPawi*MY I° u rs�Mw D Feet 0 sao �p�j��d . x � ��� 1,�0 639-4171 3 a m z N+w►.d9.dc..po. J — t --- - / ■v. ` I J e SITE DATA BUILDING DATA 'I`� mM1ar nMS �a.y I .1. ��.. . I }t 55 M i i X ''11 s,ML 3O aaa ui e! um _. n1PMxn i MOM 4f w,o± 1/1 ma MOM r* m�n w! . 'C ---. n# ; � 61018-0310 ! i 10 K!C 0. ara2025 C0.1n0•W I t tt is euLcaae�C*u ! c PARKING DATA / :1.: .. \\r,.--an KCBs UStvon 1 r EMPLOYMENT) MK NAM TS MOM MEM % ; -. s 01.01" ! NOTES COM..0 suCS M Mk. (jX' a • -_plpaq rym11 CRm 165• I DRAW WED m WOW 000,,MO MSLSAS MAUS 1 SVCSS ( �� r_.t1Or -``yam •618 L0Glla LL19N.amJ,1f0 00.13.VII/ 1mK 00 31013 rM1DIL • ! r•IaC RIME 10,81,00 4 'i•: '!' •• _ _- _____ nK 1 110500 St!31D1G 11.1 I r, .h• •"•••.•pa `t / 4 4( I 1 I I ��Mr311 ' • I nlussuu AFIIO ii. , SUm 10.! 4 b MIN OM 00141151 i//i !l+ ` 1 701/4 a0M mars rm. RAO 1 I VrMOMRMLS mVKI r -' N m . T M.M rM a r.Ir tl Lao1. 1 3- ' ,-I M ,.6�,� .I LVa M.a RED nwr 0/600.01 1 9 am In/:.MU NO"Mr cMn mm 1v sii s • 4 ^2 -t-a. r`" _ re MT.f=VIM.1x 01000 POImG u16¢31 R. .I tr/A 16'y I.Ot AWL+51113 a IIlOFlln u[ .EM V worm NM.WM IOTA w SIM6 1 S=, 5 0. 70164 ma*•07/153? + • ' - - 02 1501 ahws 5x0 l= 1 .6 ,, 1 • ! Q •V m 30.11672100 name Snm 1R M VMS. •:1/1500 s NAM 4i ,. �- I ��yyb11� I l 1 — I 4 Ism �1 m� l -r Pro mw/ 3 870.10,mmmn 3ra,,us %" '_ w1e1 i a _ It '''. �s n s ! LEGEND 1,->"a �� 'I I 11 I i hY I 11 I I I I 1 �D .....4.... « norm Mac 1 22 1 r �w S, =XX CUM a art/ "...'.+'44,"'� _� I I. I L<, SII 1 .,.@ II A! �. Pm 6n er /kt • _ 7. • n ,l' y, a r '1 g 01x00IR ••MM ' x .,,, ( 11 �� , O. nK 1 rani FMB PP 3r•• I1 - J •"'•/./ � I 1 ..I • a \'7C• ,•,'•'iHly' I II id \\ 1 MANE a all/PM MC OM6 rR 3r• I 1 .'� J �''' I� , `J�.. . �.,Pn...mn1.. 161-114 _..- _ _ to 0¢'wt 7.1221[.5670601 • ! ml/K Mom.' ---- - _ /.�' AIM= �(-1136mm R • s r. � 5010 COMM I j 1 1 ; 1 ' f nab 15 1�1 ti • _ .� h, 10606/301{� , r __ ■' a' r t a .> • �� naImart�1, vR: 1/ i6,,',I. i•: t ® Pm6nr P.M / r rtr-_ ', ! 1 1• I .h,: l I % Sam nu. �" gym• 6 o-131.10.00 i ,,',. mort n mom. U II9I0M� ,.) I r` v.M st 1 0.017 ecu1M MIME ■ ,•/ 1i /li ..- .-.1=15 _ LR-1301 M•111 IV ON MD 11114 •fMMr r.M • _ZOW i •`'h,.. �.�*I ny b ■ '-•xmru III ` (ham®U9E . 4(11111 11.1114 91613 • _P. - I�Mw n.•:•rE. I 1 I i i 1 y \/ B6�PLOYAI@(T) • 3110.our r1.. y ;5L , : .1 Sa6f1m M..�. t :� , tt ,1. . (; `, ♦ :mot__•t ` 1 yr �. 1 /" Ita1T_. \ LOT 1 ` I. I I: [ 1I • IrornnMn . \�FETA�1 H 7i I• I el..l< . 16 4 f :-= 11,.0105 153,. ='` _ 1 l UN ( 5" 11113.10 �•_ I`' �dL'1 I u 1 t 1 ' I I ` \ � I +'' 1L -•_ 7.0060 "- ,Ll`' tl, m - 001.0.;01 • ` �4\ ` Sli r-/......,- mFSAM4 f % _ ,l ,.I, 4(11 "1'1`� M 6WM 11 a‘• 1 1A1O ! �: 1610111' , r { •�• WI ft 1C 01301 : - . ^' ,t Oi ,_\n. ^�__ . �mrrr. ors .. rr.r J ��m..� yr11-.r-r� ��_ _ .■�.rt_ D �^ C) GRAMME SCALES �JI - 7 - - - -I.10,1 M 1..... Z N _III AL II December 2013 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER REVISED DETAILED Tigard,Oregon PC-1.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 11 12 13 j 14 15 16 I 17 -->n i ' 4. iiPi'::bi:,.. g •• ' /04-iu ••••••,.. '.::::::::i:.:.,::::.:.:.:.:..x.:.:.:::••;:x.... n, I i ------'• i \ / * '. 1 •... .......... ••••••••••. . ... •,... ••••••• .. / • .•:-:::,'..'..'.• '.. ••••••:::::::::::::::.:!. •• ,_____ . ' . ss‘\, .::::'. ,'.:•! . a, . \ •••\, •,.‘„. .t. ..z.../. :-:.: \ .. •>-.in‘'''''' . 1 .. . ! - - ..... \ ! = \ s k,s .••:: ,...\ \,. .\\.. ..:..,... . _ 1. ...._.=. ...., — _____,,,.. ___:,..„_..........,:.--, s:\ \ — .: :: . , . .. .4 \........::. ....., .::::. \ ,......... .....„..;,. .. l'.-_-_-.-_-_41!:.40 ., t.„ .•-..„..•... ..,. . --\ -szk.Nss, ::-.-:-..,.,•,..,.,..,,,..,.,.....—. .. t.. ,..•.•. ss.,,,,,, . , - \\ :::::.-- •,—,-_;- . --„<„,„ „.., .,,.... ..1.... ..•••• . '' ••::....:\sk....›.. s."---1-,,,Z...;••■ ::1 - ..-• %..\\ •,,z,..,,,l's..„..ss_s.,......„.."--,' ----....-----77___---- •n- '‘.. .I., F. .,. ,.‘.. *VII.: ..:•:•••• ....s. ......... . ........-.. ,,....._____-, . ' Iiii:k.":,::'::::>: :'ss. ::::•'''.11.:',...:f:::-': 1 1• Z — •I, •c*Tir v'l r.W4. .4D :•:+1-414:„ ......._---..„ 11.-.:-,___*.:_...-_-..--*"7.1.-- i ..: r 4 , 41, •••-■ '--...Iv:.•;•-■;::.:::::::.....,.....,,-,--,....,:::::-..-;-••••- •-•-• -•----- --,,,0---..• •.-:..::::::::::::..7.-7.::-=:::--:----:::-,--....::::---_-_-_-__I fil..4■1.4, 4° * .k t. '0 1 "0:04:. r—v41' - ::.. -,:7.:\‘`.;\ •• ••,.■ : _, ',.... ,,, ...:•:•:, . \\ \ ••■ h O' 'P g 1• ------' '':--s•`- ::::\ \ ‘ '■\ . ll idefoN , 1-.---..Z■,,, ..`... " ::: • 'dm.4 I ■ 4,0 l'7471"--4111 : or- & -. -, \:;::.\ \ ■ -..., ,.... \ , ■ i 404-4f, , i: ■; ,,.,. \ 1 1 •::::: 'n \ 414,0 k 1, ), 4.4 7:' nT01A04TEARcum\\ \ .]i: \a PROPOSED 121113.OUTOXIT STORAGE AREA OP :. 1P ,,b, f ..i-r■ 1/4 A,: •TIE I 1 1 ■.::::: g • ..40. ••■........... w/10FT HIGH SCREEN WALLS DER 0. 10 70 411 1..IP T'' g kst T? ..' IN PLACL I APPROMATE 4fT RETAINING NALL . O.■ i: .■0.■ AL.:6■41 1 4:44- I 1 1 MIL. . ' 1 ; 1111111:tit;Ill ' ' I ),)jki:.i: 100-1R STORN EVENT PIM STAGE LEVEL AT - I -. ..-4 / ::::. ELEVATION 175.02 FT.DE STORAGE FACIUTY IS ■ •••, ft .. ... - LOCATED OU7SDE Cf THE FUNCTIONAL 1 *11.11.t , i - -- ,---#. .€,„,--.••• . .- •. . 1 '- ,,,,- CAPACITY OF THE DETENTION FACIUTY. 1P-1-!. iL11611,,,,,Or":.-17,-1.-..',' * '.•.•0:•, .-4.r Ow, i'gritr- ' f, • • • ' • r • - • 1 if gi : 1 t',',4%..'. .. '-',1)14%.•*•1 .p."/ PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA SCALE 1* =20' .... ..................m............... ........moma •14. Walmart.I. 15935-00 . PROPOSED OUT1DOOR pi 7600 SW DARTMOUTH ST STORAGE AREA BP-1 OM OHM 03)65,7227 'WARD,OR 97223 . ATTACHMENT 3 Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Attachments: C70001268.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@tigard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (marty @tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that Wal-Mart is something of a "lightning rod"as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed, to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise, vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles (as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area,which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map & diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets,to cardboard recycling, to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/deli operation of the Wal-Mart. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 The problem with this, is that "behind" their building is in "front"full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view, they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle&can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects,especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides,or a fully enclosed building ?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax bob @mmptig.com 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday,January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE:Tigard Retail Center - Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012, well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months, with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note—I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day (a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos, they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at (503)620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, Robert L Stacy, CPA 1 ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes January 27, 2014 CALL TO ORDER Acting President Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ROLL CALL Present: Acting President Rogers Commissioner Doherty Commissioner Enloe Commissioner Feeney Commissioner Fitzgerald Commissioner Gaschke Alt. Commissioner Goodhouse Alt. Commissioner Mooney Commissioner Muldoon Commissioner Ouellette Commissioner Schmidt Absent: None Staff Present: Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director; Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant Also Present: Shawn Nguy,P.E., PacLand; Brian Dickerson,PacLand; Deborah Herron,Walmart Public Relations;John Clifton, Walmart Market Manager; Greg Hathaway,Land Use Attorney representing Walmart; Council Liaison Buehner;Tim Ramis,Attorney representing the City of Tigard PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS Acting President Rogers proposed that the elections portion of the meeting be moved to after the Public Hearing. The commissioners unanimously agreed. CONSIDER MINUTES November 18 Meeting Minutes: Acting President Rogers asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the November 18 minutes; there being none, Rogers declared the minutes approved as submitted. December 16 Meeting Minutes: Acting President Rogers asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the December 16 minutes; there being none, Rogers declared the minutes approved as submitted. Page 1 of 7 OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Acting President Rogers opened the public hearing. PUBLIC HEARING: PDR2013-00003 —Tigard Retail Center Modifications The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Walmart building. Acting President Rogers noted that this public hearing will address the 1,356 square foot recycle building only;nothing else is included within this public hearing. QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING STATEMENTS Acting President Rogers read the required statements and procedural items from the quasi- judicial hearing guide. There were no abstentions; there were no challenges of the commissioners for bias or conflict of interest. Commissioner Enloe declared that he has a friend who works for PacLand; however, he stated that doesn't believe that it would interfere with his ability to make a decision. Ex-parte contacts: None. Site visitations: Commissioner Matt Muldoon reported that he'd walked by the site. No one wished to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission; no conflicts of interest. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Gary Pagenstecher introduced himself and went over his staff report. (The staff report in its entirety is available one week before the scheduled Planning Commission meeting.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the proposed minor modification to the approved Planned Development Detailed Plan meets the applicable Approval Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed modifications. APPLICANTS TESTIMONY Greg Hathaway,Attorney for Walmart, introduced himself and the other people present who would be part of the presentation: Deborah Herron,Walmart Director of Public Affairs for the Pacific Northwest;John Clifton, Northern Oregon Walmart Market Manager; Project Engineers Brian Dickerson and Shawn Nguy from PacLand. He noted that they'd reviewed the staff report carefully and believe staff has carefully evaluated the application. He said the submitted application is comprehensive, thorough and addresses all the applicable criteria. He noted this is a minor modification that is just an outdoor recycling facility and that it doesn't affect hardly anything—but anything it does affect, as far as any of the criterion, has been addressed in the application and staff has addressed it as well— and determined that, based on the facts, that all the standards have been satisfied. He requested that the Planning Commission adopt that staff report as basis for the approval. Page 2 of 7 At this point, Deborah Herron of Walmart came up to explain why Walmart is requesting the proposal. Ms. Herron said they are asking for permission to add a recycling storage area behind the store that's under construction behind SW Dartmouth. The area is relatively contained and would include a three-sided screening as well as landscaping and other elements. She said it would be screened from Hermosa Way and any neighbors that would be driving by. The purpose of the area helps contribute to the company's goal of achieving zero waste. The area would store items like cardboard, tin, plastic packaging, wood pallets and other types of recyclable materials, typically already compacted. From this storage place they would be transported to whatever recycling facility they choose to use. There should not be any odors,plastics or bottle recycling in this area. This is for product packaging materials only. At this point Brian Dickerson, civil engineering consultant for Walmart, came up to go through more details. He went through a PowerPoint presentation (Exhibit A) giving more information, showing photos, and drawings to help detail what this would look like and how it complies with the set criterion. The proposed storage area is 12'X 113'with a 10' CMU Screen Wall for screening what's stored in that area. The walls are on the south, east, and west. The side that's open is to the north, directly facing the store. In addition to the screen wall there will be landscaping all around it(see page 7 of Exhibit A). He explained how there's a sloping area that will be heavily landscaped (page 9 of Exhibit A) and how the view of the area from the Herrnoso Way sidewalk doesn't show the storage area because it's hidden behind the screen wall and landscaping. As landscaping grows,it will probably even screen the screen wall itself. Once things get established, all that will really be seen is landscaping. QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Doherty asked whether the area would be covered; and how often the material is moved. Mr. Dickerson answered: It is not covered and the material is moved, on average, every few days to a week. Who moves it?At this point Ms. Herron came back up to answer questions. Walmart. When during the day is it moved? Typically our trucks don't arrive before 7 to 8 in the morning and usually they've departed the area by the afternoon traffic-so usually mid'morning to early afternoon. How large are the trucks?Standard delivery trucks— the same as most retailers— 53 foot trailer trucks. Do you have rodent problems? Rats? Mice?Not in our stores. We have pest management plans and make sure to be diligent so we don't have issues in our stores. Why is the recycling outside as opposed to inside? Having the storage area outside allows us to have more room inside the store for products and an area to take the packaging material outside where it's not in the way of customers or associates. Why was it situated where it is at the back of the store and not the front? That entire section of the store is a service area so we are meeting the expectations in the code through the landscaping as well as through the screening wall to meet the criteria on visibility and screening that the City of Tigard requires. There was a question about smell and waste and Ms. Herron went into great detail about how Walmart has a zero waste policy that extends not only to cardboard and tin and plastics, but it extends to the food side of the business as well—partnering with Food Bank of Oregon. Acting President asked whether this structure is strictly for cardboard, plastic, tin, and wood pallets. Ms. Herron said they have a compactor inside the store that does the first compaction that will create the bales and pallets that will be placed in this area. Does anything else go in there?No. Is there any kind of enforcement to make sure wrong items don't get placed in the Page 3 of 7 recycling area? The store manager would be the one responsible.for making sure this area has only the correct recyclables in them. Commissioner Fitzgerald had a question about smoking employees. She said sometimes recycling areas become places where employees go to smoke on a break. Will you go so far as to put receptacles out there so that's not unsightly and adding to everything else that's happening out there? lVe appreciate you raising that and we will certainly take that under advisement. Greg Hathaway summarized that this particular outdoor recycling storage area use is permitted so long as it's properly screened. It's our burden that it's actually screened and that the wall that anyone on the outside can see has some visual attractiveness— so it's not unsightly. That's why we attempted to demonstrate here with the sight line, evidence, if you will, that people adjacent to the property will not be able to observe anything behind that screen wall. If anyone has questions about that we take that very seriously and Deborah is happy to talk with any of the property owners that might be affected or who are present here about that. There was a question about pallet height and Walmart Market Manager,John Clifton, answered that they are about six feet tall. There's a practical consideration and safety consideration so that 10 foot screen would be good. There was a question asked about the plant material. Mr. Clifton said the plant material in question is Hogan Cedar—and that's what's called for in the landscape plan. They arc six foot minimum height at the time of planting. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR - None TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION—Steve Bintliff, 13520 SW 122nd Ave.,Tigard— speaking on behalf of the citizen group called "Tigard First" read from his written testimony(Exhibit B). As an aside, (not in prepared statement) he said he has some experience in his real job—it's common for pallets coming from Asia to have insects and invasive species in them—and having that wall with wooden pallets that close to the natural area should be a concern for us. Marvin VonRenchler 7475 SW Hermosa Way, Tigard said he's impacted because he lives near Walmart. He's concerned about the noise. Not opposed to progress—said in the beginning especially the noise and dust was terrible. He said the noise is pretty much all night long. The trucks go all night long and there are very bright lights. He's concerned about the recycle center bringing more trucks and more noise. He's concerned that they are straight on the times and not change it to 7pm and 8pm —like the noise going on now. Commissioner Doherty asked if they were doing excavation at night. Mr. VonRenchler said he wasn't sure but it creates lots of noise and light. Robert C. Davidson, Owner of Minuteman Press of Tigard—directly behind the proposed recycling area—7555 SW Hermoso Way,Tigard says he's not opposed to Walmart being there—he's happy to see something other than a weed field that's been inundating his property since they first built a building there. He said they actually addressed most of his concerns (his letter is in the commissioner's packets). He went through an email Page 4 of 7 . he'd written (and was in the packets). He said he'd endured the noise, dust, and ground shaking vibrations caused by heavy equipment. He said to this point in time, lx'almart has not been a very good neighbor. His building has been dirty all summer long. Dust everywhere. The wind blows in his direction 90% of the time so he's concerned about odors and litter and so forth. Commissioner Doherty asked what kind of shaking is taking place—are there any city building regulations they have to follow?Mr. Davidson answered that he understands it's an unavoidable side effect of heavy construction and that it will go away when the construction's done. REBUTTAL FOR APPLICANT Greg Hathaway brought up Steve Bintliffls point about not having material (graphic, proposal, pictures, etc.) available before the hearing. He said the City of Tigard planning staff had all the material. City staff came up and said that the public notice states how any citizen can request information on how to obtain that material. It is available seven days before the public hearing. Mr. Hathaway spoke to the concern of noise—he said the noise that's taking place at night is road construction; not on the site itself. He said the ODOT permit requires night time construction. To address Mr. Davidson's concern (the property owner across the street) about the line of sight—Brian Dickerson came back up and expounded on the vision lines from the various properties. He showed how Mr. Davidson's building relates to the vision and the sight lines to the screen wall itself. QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Muldoon questioned the timeframe of the recycling trucks—would 7am be the earliest they'd come by?John Clifton said for recycling purposes 7am is fine. During the daylight hours the bales get picked up. It's not an overnight or evening process at all. 7am— 6pm would be a non-issue as far as recycling. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked about the question that had come up about the modification of adding square footage to the site. Gary Pagenstecher said this had been addressed on the staff report—page 4 that is available to the public one week before the public hearing. Brian Dickerson said this information was on the application as well. He said there is a significantly less amount of coverage on the site in terms of pervious areas than what was previously approved — even with the addition of this. He said the net reduction in the impervious area, even with this addition, is approximately 4,500 sq ft by the reductions in the drive aisles and the addition of the porous pavement. In the staff report it's identified as a percentage—a decrease of.8% and the recycling center added .2%with a net decrease of.6%. Alt. Commissioner Goodhouse asked why a roof wasn't proposed to be over the recycling area—particularly with the rain. John Clifton stated this is not the standard practice for this type of storage facility—especially a large retail format like this. There are other large retailers within a close vicinity to this site that also store these kinds of materials outside. It is not typical to put a roof over it. Page 5 of 7 Commissioner Muldoon asked "Is there a condition with a limit that you're comfortable with to stack pallets?" I'm not aware of the city having the practice of doing something like that. I think the screen wall of 10 feet would screen it properly. PUBLIC HEARING - CLOSED MOTION Commissioner Muldoon said he would like to add two conditions of approval that he would call"Condition A" before submitting a motion. Condition A-"Have truck service to, from and inclusive of idling at the recycling facility restricted to lam to 6pm-daylight hours; and materials stacked no higher than the top of the recycling facility screen." Commissioner Doherty added another condition-"A rodent/pest control plan shall be in place." Commissioner Muldoon made the following motion: "I move for APPROVAL of application case number PDR2013-00003 and adoption of the findings and conditions of approval modified by earlier defined "Condition A," and also a pest control plan and other conditions of approval as contained in the staff report and based on the testimony tonight." Commissioner Fitzgerald seconded the motion. The motion passed by a majority vote: Yes No Acting President Rogers - Commissioner Doherty - l� Commissioner Enloe - Commissioner Feeney - 0 Commissioner Fitzgerald - Commissioner Gaschke - El Commissioner Muldoon - Commissioner Ouellette - Commissioner Schmidt OFFICER ELECTIONS Commissioner Muldoon moved to nominate Vice President Jason Rogers for the office of President. Commissioner Feeney seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations. The motion passed with a unanimous vote. Commissioner Don Schmidt moved to nominate Commissioner Calista Fitzgerald for the office of Vice President; Commissioner Doherty seconded the motion. There were no other nominations. The motion passed with a unanimous vote. Page 6 of 7 OTHER BUSINESS Regarding the River Terrace Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) — Former Commissioner Richard Shavey was the Planning Commission liaison to this group. He is no longer on the Planning Commission so the Commission needs to appoint another Planning Commission liaison to take his place. Commissioner Brian Feeney volunteered to be that liaison and the other commissioners agreed that he be the new appointee to the River Terrace SWG. ADJOURNMENT President Rogers adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commits n Secretary iamb- A EST: P' reiit Jason Rogers Page 7 of 7 T• ar d Retail C Outdoor Recycling Storage Area Planned Development Review Minor Modification Presented by: TURNING VISIONS INTO REALITY • • • ,� � - — —mat. ?f', ....�,w... , ..,;.• ... : . -;$1'(.(,,f-:: . . , 4*.... :-.---4,,,-e.1.44.: 4:1:1 ` Y V� ••r.. ,"k • r . 4 < V Picture of similar Recycling Storage Area Eastport Plaza, Portland, OR U ,Ii -(4.''' ,, , 0 4..,4",..' .4.,.......t,.,, 1M 11; r ;o —� l 1i bna IrD 1. s < IQ EmP ' l° . ,te ,. , 1 hu.ttii•ii0 0 .• - ' 'l 1r'1 111 1111 NM 4 • r r L 1,I r) et a ° i rD la. . _. Altair .: 1111 • 1 h` `1 BETE DATA 9 LDl4Q DATA n.m POP, ;*....'..........\'-‘,..J : •jai y�qr is ff CIa j � L.1 151,0 Pt pp*, St / ... Eut L. ... P.Ow.A. w.0 i• 6ti' '.Ot +tr.i. ► Mott° :� 1r C-0 ZONE PAF�ClK3 DATA 00ED USE r f t a me try: I � U BH.ON761n row r. i f NQff'$_� nrerw «wlu I 1 I*(WY ..•r YO rx•[.rxr..r . ., asaus_ IMr.RPM �Y PPP req SC..Y/l a r./rY e4[ •seta am l M.•r.R ** AP P.an 0+00111.10 PPP*Pad OAP MO ;,r• .m•Di.sSV FPO OW V Dad CPA Milt Ps PPM PEP _ �� I— r"—I �I+—� vim..w r.s.ria°e a�,�C v ' ti tabu+ / i' 1, au w.e PR RAW ad•rs. son wor+•n >,aru II s E 1 �e..ri POOP°•. !�•.raw rral.• a ar wr.> NO a II=MA MINIRS1.10 / ' \ Q , ,I 1 3 .i�r i ..i se w+[r.au.nl.sra Ma ar,Mow PI PI SUMPS.01 Cane SPut r . S COM/DM 11,0 Mt 1111 II y 1 --poop UP .��_�� ,// t . �. I . �� .l w :1 .�I ryale OAP rlx.•w /.yq "� r _ a . , ar• i me a 41 aF. wale OAP runs m•aa.w ' ' +• . /.:,,,,,,,".'. I Fx wall Mow rm. •((S 1 II • + Ww` �•�I. Yc[blMCIY/.i ii ti —_... 1 P+�.o1p�.as a.a �f - 1r �.nw .R Fi it say 1� ., iV iv :111' .r n wax / f�, / � e s ;sf ttm.x :,'. , d. . -. ..�.,Rb =� ' r %7 LxO.T�3 ti salt.•. i r:7,1'4 ' '.' nali�mait/ 1 tyl l: " ' ® .mr.nubs:........ NESS mon a maw i r y4 !� wrs� � � 5,, �# 1 a 1 r �' -201E e` !*1 _ firi ;+ , leer n.a as ru•xae 1111, 13t-,..; • 1 r "� // .r � 1 PUPS u 1 R tie • .- 4, I- 1 l' ^ a 1 .' \�\ Za ��Y 1` — lY•M R '—�. /dt L--, �—� 1 = �� MUMS W M/ Previously Approved Site Plan .1=_I••LJIIINILJIIIIIILJIIIIIILJIIIIILJMWIIIIILIIIIll_irnWiML-IIIIIIILJIIIIIL,NIIP.MNLJIIIIIIIL JIM IMP i i `'} / CLEAR AREA OF WEED PLANT OVERGROWTH I c ( 1 c c c c i �� AND INSTALL 6' CIIAINLINK FENCE WITH ,- BLACK PRIVACY SLATS ON PROPERTY LINE I— • 1N5Q '01108'S5F BIKEEDASIRIAN / O® Yv� t c V---c— c c T..� J W FIT. / 0 1 ® 9 9 9 9 ` kIt ,_ y( cc i' Ili r. rr + / I co , `I `c C C C C l �1.' 11 0) 14; MUE ZONE .k\ \ 1 14 a D3 9 9 3 3 D 7 '9 7 • ',iit = _ I - N "-20 RICYCI F �—5 PEDESTRIAN PARKING SPACES C �� .��, �-,, PATH �`1 I TRASH COMPACTOR— ` i NTRY /EXIT LOT 3 .Cr ? '1 FPONQ( H I ll VVaIrnart REEN WALL i 4 137,900 SF+ .. FFF = 180.00 r;r ' IING LL 'PANT �`30.33' / C-G ZONE MUE ZONE IIAG POLE ,f" I (MIXED USE 1 e _ EMPLOYMENT) MN M � —M- ——— ———— �i 1 ll I — — I t} -- CLEAR AREA OF WEED PLANT OVERGROWTH c Ire4 c c c , ! ( AND INSIALL 6' CI IAINL,Nk I LNCL W1111 3LACh Pt?IVACY SLA IS ON PROPER I Y IJNL . fi i Q C 1 3 J 7 1 0 i I I F�1 2�' { ! 1 I ,—NO8'18'S5”F l I 1 0.00' �r 8' PEDESTRIAN / • I ! BIKE f'AIH C ! 1 I 4Cti C C I C I 1 , t I1 ��tir�"rr—��� CO 9. l n1 ter . t (( O I 0 l ( 9 � 9 7 i�a- \'t' i '}I /.— „1 .7----+• LL 0-.•. ■ , ,,t () `� �I MUE NE :: (i1 a 3 3 3 3 3;11,3 0 9 1 9 a 313 9�i °, j - <.iii, `--20 RiCYCI F ,—5' PEDESTRIAN PARKING' SPACES C—( Z.0? . .�PATH Y1, I ^. I TRASH COMPACTOR � �„ ~`' -...-1-- '- iII �' r=\ 10' CMU Nifty / L?i!I Cr I ' CFTFNTItI�' LOT 3 ' / I DOM) ' SCREEN Walmart 18' HI^, _ _ F } ;�� 1 WALL SCREEN 'WALL 4 I. ti. C—ijH—NO—NO �,� . '"� ' ��,� 1 7,9b0 SF+ ,F= = 1PO.OIJ PROPOSED r/� 1 •• i r I RCYCLL STORAGE AREA .� � t r Rpsc C—G ZONE MUE ZONE i IC OLL (12'x113') r j® ,' (MIXED USE 1 EMPLOYMENT)I ii "- I ', `-" .;r' CLEAR AREA OF WEED PLANT OVERGROWTH c: : 1 - - / '''' 14,' AND INSTALL 6' Ct IAINLINK FLNCL ,M 1H .; BLACK PRIVACY SLATS ON PROPERTY UNE 1 'I H Q . a -N0818'S5'F 4 ' • . ' `50.0 ;, 8' PEDESTRIAN / .. . .,,,,�, �.:.. /' 0 - .. ! BiNE PAN _ _ CO 0 : I Z U i / ' z ® �,_ is q. CO �?�C.� l MUE ZONE ' \ , .. : 3 I 3 1 3 I 3 I 3:______tWI3 3 3 ?. 3 3' , . .t I I Fl 1"1 . i I! , . 1 ---_____/ —20 RICYCL F - _ PARKING SPACES C � N « I TRASH COMPACTOR-- I •LOT 3 1�=�'�I 10' CMU ♦II , / ' SCREEN VValmart 16' HIGH WALL SCREEN WALL ,:5 a .0 -�4 aJ 137,900 SF± FFF = 180.00 PROPOSED STORAGE AREA ' r-� C—G ZONE MUE ZONE (12'x113') (MIXED USE z EMPLOYMENT) ISM-OM-AIM ME Ma-l■-■-•M--■1-1111111-1111111-1111111-111111111-1•1111- 11M-MINI-11M-11111111-1111•M-MM-IMM-ilai-iNF.,MFil IMF -Ma NW NM IMO IMO MO■111!MEI MI.J . - . ..., \ a--, W Imart ...-,, Recycling ..- r".. . ' i.. ...., . -- •- ,.. l- 4Storage Area ,,,, '4,...-48.' 7 4.41#044' fl"4'.'''''V''‘A*`,... '' ' ' ''' ' )''''''' ,,.,-- ■, .",.."...'"" ,c. 1;:c7140.1*4V44.44-'',9`j . , N ' Screen Wall - ..:, -- ., ,.., Office Building ...,:,...1,-,. -,., . - - ., -,.. . , ,. . #-. , - , ... • ... .... , .....-- 04; ._ ..-., , t lz.t.„. .,... -* ,...... . , (1-)•., , • ,, ., '" ..,... ...7 '.' ' ' ' '''. .10. • i e from He vision Triangle rmoso • • and Office B ! Idling Office Building Walmart Building Hermosa Way Screen Wall (Storage Area Behind Wall) "' '' section on 1+ 11111 1111i1itil : j �( 1 111 11!!1 1 !I !i � �. l� ll + f � ( � ► ► ti t ! i � , s 1 91 ii 1 I1l (Ij ' � . � � � � � o � l � � tt � � � ► r � t " � � � ► � ► , , � � ` � ' I � � i ; ' U ' l �j I � r 11 11i1����lj;lf�j�(WI1.;YIN ( � � (�� i ! ! � ) a ! ( 1 !191 ( 1� 1 1j ( ) � 1 � � � � t � • ; � � 6 t � ' r ' � WI ! � �19 �� �r � 1 ►i�ll� ! ajll`1lij � � ? � tf (�l t l i { L ' a � i r ' " WWI ill 11 f 1111111111111 11 l I('!� ' � � � � � � E � � � ' � ' ' 11 1 1 i( I J 1 l a ! 11r ! ' 1 ' 1 ` I 1 � � � 1 '� ii l�i' `�� ! ! (j�l N � � ► iii ► t ► � 1 � � � � f � l � ; , 11l�l� i(Ij( i View from Hermoso Sideway TIGARD First!'' Members of the Tigard Planning Commission, My name is Steve Bintliff, a long-time Tigard resident, and speaking on behalf of the citizen group, Tigard First. I'm speaking tonight in opposition to the 'minor modification'proposed to the previously approved Tigard Retail Center planned development. Our opposition is based on 3 points: 1. The application is incomplete • It doesn't show the exact planned location of the recycling storage area, so members of the public can't assess it's relationship to the main building, setbacks, access points, and aesthetics. • It doesn't give the building materials that will be used, their height or any other descriptive information needed to determine adherence to applicable planning code requirements. For this reason, we believe this application should be rejected until such time as these details can be provided and available for review in advance by the public. 2. The proposed modification makes it inconsistent with the originally approved concept plan, for the following reasons: Section 18.350.070 of the Tigard Code states that: "minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a)the change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking. b)the change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping. Per criteria(a),The addition of a recycling center will add to the lot coverage on the site. Whether the area is a fenced perimeter or a roofed structure, doesn't matter. By definition in the Tigard Code, any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner is a'Building'. Depending on where it's located, it may also reduce the amount of parking from the plan. Per criteria(b), The addition of the recycling center will reduce the amount of open space, and may reduce the amount of landscaping for the site. Again, per the Tigard Code,this proposed recycling area constitutes a major modification to the previously approved detailed plan. • ' TI GAR\ First!" 3. Finally, this application is unnecessary. Absorbing this area into the main building would use only 1%of the useable area. Why can't the owner accommodate that? This is an unnecessary modification to a planned development in which there has been so much confusion, concern, and anger in the past. The owner,the applicant and this Commission need to understand that for this development in particular, the public's need for transparency and accountability must be satisfied and upheld. Stephen Bintliff Tigard First tigardfirst.org I"‘ frk'ntzfI)f To Our Neighbors, T. .10. At Walmart,we are doing all we can to generate less waste and recycle as much as we can in order to move toward our goal of putting zero waste into landfills. ' k A In an effort to be a good neighbor while maximizing recycling, we plan to add a screened recyclables staging area outside our future Tigard store. We recently submitted an application to the City of Tigard to add this area outside the south side of the store, with a ten foot high wall to shield recyclables from view as it awaits pick up. NIValnnar Items to be stored in this area include cardboard,tin,plastic packaging,wood pallets and other recyclables that will be • bound into large bales. Materials will be kept in the area for relatively short periods before being hauled to recycling centers. We recognize that you may have questions about this proposal 44,4, t, and please feel free to contact Deborah Herron,Walmart Director of Public Affairs and Government Relations at(503)530-6690. Recycle, Move to Repurpose, Reuse Zero Waste Walmart has reduced waste in its U.S.operations by more than A large compactor inside the store compresses 80 percent. That reduction,which brings Walmart closer to recyclable goods into large bales through Walmart's its goal to create zero waste,has the potential to prevent 11.8 Super Sandwich Bale(SSB) program.Items included million metric tons of CO:emissions annually. in the program include cardboard,paper,aluminum, Walmart compiles disposal and recover data for 50 separate plastic bags and roughly 30 other items.Items not waste categories,such as cardboard,paper,aluminum,plastic eligible for the SSB,including wood pallets,polystyrene bags and more. Annually,Walmart recycles*: plastic and apparel,are sent to our return centers for reuse or recycling. Enough corrugated cardboard to equal the weight of nearly,; 19 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS. Will the Area Emit and Odor? As much plastic packaging film as the weight of This area is not part of our food waste recycling 1.7 LINCOLN MEMORIALS. program or bottle return area.It is only intended to house recyclable items like product packaging and Enough bales of recycled materials that, laid end-to-end, wood pallets. would equal the length of 4,482.2 FOOTBALL FIELDS. If you have questions please contact: %1 Deborah Herron,Walmart of Director,Public Affairs and Government Relations Walmart Phone:(503)530-6690•Email:deborah.herron @wal-mart.com Save money. Live better. Agenda Item: 6 Hearing Date:January 27.2014 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION CASE NO.: Planned Development Review(PDR) PDR2013-00003 (Minor Modification) APPLICANT: PACLAND OWNER: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business 6400 SE Lake Road, Trust Suite 300 2001 SE 10th Street Portland,OR 97222 Mail Stop 5570 Bentonville,AR 72716-5570 REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001),which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street west of SW 72nd Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200; 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101;and 2S101AB,Tax Lot 01400. ZONES/ COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: C-G (PD): General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. (PD): The property has a planned development overlay designation. The purposes of the planned development overlay zone are: 1) To provide a means for property development that is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan through the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the City; 2) To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal,eal,and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; 3) To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-0)(X)3) PAGE 1 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits, while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning; 4) To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, water resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation of alternatives, conceptual review, then detailed review) that can relate the type and design of a development to a particular site; 5) To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of density requirements, which will balance the interests of the owner, developer, neighbors, and the City; and 6) To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainable and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed- use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and- ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle, it is still important to 1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible; and 2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate intra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. The zone may be applied elsewhere in the City through the legislative process. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755, and 18.790. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed minor modification to the approved Planned Development Detailed Plan meets the applicable Approval.Standards as outlined in this report.Therefore,Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed modifications. TIC MU)REF Ch:N"I I R S'T'AFF REPORT(PDR2O13-(NN$13) PAGI;2 OF 10 PI..ANNING COMMISSION IIEARING 1/27/2014 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The subject site has been subject to a number of development proposals since the 1990s. Recently, the Planning Commission approved the Tigard Retail Center Detailed Plan (PDR2008-00001) with Final Order No. 2009-02 PC, effective June 17, 2009. The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site. A subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001) approved under Final Order No. 2010-01 removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. The site is currently under construction by Wal-Mart. Vicinity Information The subject 18.16-acre property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street,west of SW 72nd Avenue, and east of Hwy 217 in the Tigard Triangle (see Attachment 1). The subject site, zoned primarily C-G (PD) with a 0.45 acre parcel in the southeast corner zoned MUE, is surrounded on the north, west and east by C-G (PD) zoned land, and on the southeast by land zoned MUE. A 10.42-acre significant wetland associated with Red Rock Creek is located adjacent to the site on the west which buffers Hwy 217. Vacant developable land exists to the east fronting on SW 72"d, which was once a part of the previous approvals on the subject site. The area to the southeast, zoned MUE, is a neighborhood in transition where a number of residences have converted to commercial uses. Proposal Description The applicant requests approval for a minor modification to the approved planned development detail plan as shown in the Revised Detailed Development Plan, Sheet PC-1.0 (see Attachment 2). The proposed modification would add a 12' x 113' (1,356 square feet) outdoor recycling storage area at the rear of the site (see Attachment 3). The area would be contained within a 10' tall CMU screen wall and would support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, the facility will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposal would otherwise be consistent with the previously approved plan. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain predominantly discretionary approval criteria. Type III-PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to the City Council. As the proposal is a modification of Planning Commission Order No. 2009-02, the appropriate review is through the Type III-PC hearing process, pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050. SECTION V. NOTICE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENT The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity to provide written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. On December 31, 2013 the City mailed notice to neighbors within 500 feet and other interested parties. On January 11, 2014, staff posted the subject site with a notice. In addition, the January 9th edition of The Times included a notice of the Planning Commission hearing. Staff received two written comments from adjacent businesses: Bob Davidson, Minute Man Press at 7555 SW Hermoso Way (see Attachment 4) and Robert L Stacy, CPA at 7540 Hermoso Way (see Attachment 5) asking for clarification on the proposal with respect to the type of recycling activity and the adequacy of screening. T IGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-0x003) PAGE 3 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION I TEARING 1/27/2014 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The applicable review criteria for the proposed addition of a recycling storage area are contained in the following Community Development Code Chapters: 18.350, Planned Developments; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.620, Tigard Triangle Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage;and 18.790 Urban Forestry. Unless otherwise noted in the findings for these code sections below, the project is consistent with the approved 2010 Tigard Retail Center application (PC Order No.2010-01 PDR2010-0001). Pursuant to T i g a r d Development Code 18.390.050.E.1, "Approval or denial of a . . . Type III action shall be based on standards and criteria, which shall be set forth in the development ordinance, and which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit application to the development ordinance . . ." This staff report to the Planning Commission is limited to the review of the code sections cited above and contains a staff recommendation for the Commission's review and decision on the proposed modification. 18.350 — PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 18.350.060 Compliance with specific development standards. The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance with base zone provisions,with the following modifications: 1. Lot dimensional standards. 2. Site coverage. 3. Building height. 4. Structure setback provisions: 5.All other provision of the base zone shall apply except as modified by this chapter. No modifications to the base zone development standards have been requested with this minor modification application or with the original application approving the Tigard Retail Center. The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan, and continues to meet standards of the base zone provisions as described in the applicant's narrative and the finding in this staff report,below,in 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts. 18.350.070.A Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if all the following applicable criteria are met: 18.350.070.A.1 The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan. Minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; There is no residential component to the approved plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. Parking is unaffected in the area where the storage area is proposed. This criterion is met. `17GARD RE l AIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-001X/3) PAGE 4 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 b.The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; As described above,the net landscaping is approximately 0.6%greater than the approved detail plan. The amount of landscaping will not be reduced with the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The change involves a change in use; The proposed recycling storage area is an accessory use to the permitted retail use. No change of use is proposed. This criterion is met. d. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard;and The location of the proposed recycling area is between the perimeter service access road and the water quality swale at the south edge of the property. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. In addition, the proposed storage area is located approximately 30 feet north of the significant wetland buffer,or 80 feet north of the wetland itself. The proposed modification does not commit land to development that is environmentally sensitive of subject to a potential hazard. This criterion is met. e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. The proposed modification will not affect the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, or other site improvements of the approved plan. As mentioned under criterion (a) above, there will be a 0.5% net coverage decrease with the addition of the proposed recycling storage area and a consequent 0.5%increase in landscaping.The proposed change is minor.This criterion is met. FINDING: As shown in the above analysis, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan does not make the modified detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan. The detailed plan would remain generally consistent with the concept plan and can be approved. 18.350.070.4.b.(1) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between single-family and multi-family residential,and residential and commercial uses; The only adjacent property with a different type of land use is located to the southeast corner of the development. Although the adjacent property is zoned MUE which allows similar commercial use, the existing use of the noted property is residential. The approved detailed development plan provides a 20'buffer between any hard surface improvements or structures (pedestrian path) and the existing residential use of the property. The proposed recycling storage area is approximately 120 feet from the adjacent property to the southeast. According to the Buffer Matrix,Table 18.745.1&2, only a 10 foot buffer is required. The buffer will consist of groundcover, shrubs, trees, and hedges per the Buffer Matrix requirements and as shown on the approved plans (Sheet L-lb, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit).This standard is met. 18.350.070.4.b.(3) On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: a)What needs to be screened; b) The direction from which it is needed; and c) Whether the screening needs to be year-round. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-00()03) PAGE 5 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located approximately 100' from the adjacent property to the south, and approximately 120' from adjacent property to the southeast. In addition to the 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall, significant landscaping will be planted in the area between the property line and the outdoor recycling storage area (Sheet L-1 b, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). The landscape trees in these areas will include evergreen trees that will provide additional screening year-round. The combination of the 10-ft high CMU screen wall, the landscaping with evergreen trees, as well as the distance of the outdoor recycling storage area from the property line,will provide adequate screening from the adjacent properties. This standard is met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan is generally consistent with the approved concept plan and may be approved. Buffering and screening approved with the detailed plan exceed the requirements in the code and together with the proposed 10-foot high CMU screening wall, will satisfactorily buffer and screen the proposed recycling storage area. The applicable planned development standards and approval criteria are met. 18.520— (COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS) �s 18.520.040 Development Standards A. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370; The subject site is primarily zoned C-G(PD) with a small portion zoned MUE in the southeast corner adjacent to Hermoso Way. The proposed recycling area is located in the C-G(PD) zoned portion of the property. General retail use is permitted outright in both the C-G and MUE zones and the proposed storage area is an accessory use to the approved retail use and is therefore also a permitted use. The proposed modification is subject to the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district as reviewed below. The applicant has not obtained or requested any variances or adjustments. 2.All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. All other applicable standards and requirements, as reviewed in this staff report,are met. B. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.502.2. The standards in Table 18.502.2 applicable to the proposed recycling storage area include: STANDARDS C-G (PD) Approved Proposed Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 0 ft - 100ft. 100 ft. Maximum Site Coverage (PD): 85% 80% 67.0% 66.4% Minimum Landscaping (PD): 15% 20% 33% 33.6% The location of the proposed recycling storage area is in the rear yard approximately 100 feet from the southern property line approximately 30 feet closer than the approved store wall and loading dock screen wall. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland TIGARD RETAIL CENTI R s rAFI REPORT(PDR2013-00003) PAGE 6 OF 1() PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 buffer areas of the site. The proposed modification meets the applicable development standards for the C-G zone. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan with the addition of the 1,356 square foot recycling area meets the applicable Commercial Zoning District development standards. 18.620 — (TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS) 18.620.040.A Building Design Standards All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance,is satisfied. 4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. FINDING: As shown in the applicant's plans and narrative, the material proposed for the 10- foot screen wall around the outdoor recycling storage area will be painted, split faced CMU (concrete masonry unit) block. Foundation materials below or within two feet of finish grade may be plain concrete or concrete block as allowed by this section. This applicable Tigard Triangle Design Standards are met. 18.755— IXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE): A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non- residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow,outright or by condition, for such uses. 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and I, the storage area must be able to accept at least all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. The approved development included indoor storage areas able to accept all "principal recyclable materials" (currently these materials include newspaper, ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, aluminum, container glass, office paper, and tin cans (OAR 340- 60-030)) for the operation of the approved Tigard Retail Center. The proposed outdoor recycling storage allows for additional management of materials to be recycled and/or re-used by Walmart. The applicant states that consistent with Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re- purposed, including items such as cardboard bales,wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-001103) PAGE 7 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION I IEARING 1/27/2014 delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposed modification exceeds the principle recyclable materials provision. This criterion is met. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. As noted in the approved 2008 application, the minimum standards method was used to adequately size the trash enclosures for the proposed retail pads for this site. The trash compactor for the anchor store building is based on typical building requirements of the anchor retailer. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on Walmart's typical requirements for being able to store materials that can be recycled and re-used. Walmart has an aggressive sustainability program which includes, among other things, the recycling and re-use of such things as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items are typically stored until such time that Walmart's delivery trucks return to the distribution center, at which time the stored items are loaded in the empty truck trailer and returned for re-use and/or recycling. Accordingly, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is not serviced by the typical franchised hauler and is only for Walmart's use. This storage area has been coordinated with the franchise hauler, Pride Disposal,who has indicated they have no objection to the outdoor recycling storage area. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area meets the minimum standards method of compliance. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance,described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be collocated with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. As shown on the applicant's site plan (Sheet BP-1) the proposed exterior recycling storage area is located to the rear of Retail 3 (Walmart) and south of the access road. The area is adjacent to and central to the truck loading areas of the store. A 10-foot CMU screen wall is proposed to screen that area from adjacent commercial properties to the south. The applicable location standards are met. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2)13-U(1(X)3) PAGE 8 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed recycling area will meet Walmart's size requirements, have adequately addressed the Uniform Fire Code standards, and will be enclosed by a 10 foot high split CMU screening wall. The applicable design standards are met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Access to the storage area will not require backing out of a driveway onto a public street. Adequate turning radii are provided to allow collection vehicles to safely exit the site in a forward motion. The proposed storage area will be serviced by Walmart or vendor trucks and not by the local franchise hauler. The applicable access standards are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed development complies with the applicable Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage standards. 18.790—(Urban Forestry): 18.790.020 states the requirements of this chapter apply to planned development (Type III) land use reviews. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The proposed modification to the site plan to include an outdoor recycling storage area is minor and is substantially similar to the approved site plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the project will not increase the previously approved site 1G_ARI)RI,`I'.A IL(:I.:NTI:R I'.AI I R1:POR'I (PllR2u13-(NMMIi) 1'\GI?9 OI In PL\\\1\(1( 0\1\11SSION I II:.AKING 1/27/2014 impervious area and therefore will not impact the open soil volume available to implement the approved landscaping plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the landscaping plan previously approved for the Target store and as coordinated with city staff during the site permitting review process will continue to provide approximately 38% effective tree canopy coverage for the site, in excess of the 33% minimum required for the C-G zone. The effective canopy area only takes into account trees that, at the time of planting, will meet the city's minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirement. It does not include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees that will be planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. The 33% canopy coverage requirement for the entire site is met with the minor modification for the outdoor recycling storage area. The applicable Urban Forestry standards are met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Development Review Engineer commented that the proposed location of the recycling area may conflict with the full function of the adjacent detention pond. The applicant responded that no changes to the approved stormwater management system are proposed with this application. No additional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project since the overall impervious area of the site decreased from what was previously approved with the Target project. The proposed storage area is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. The drainage report, dated August 2008, submitted with the Target application provided a summary of the pond stage for various storm events. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level.As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified of the proposed modification and indicated that a required minimum clearance of 30ft must be maintained between the storage area and the exterior door on the south wall of the building in order to comply with Chapter 34 of the NFP1 Fire Code. The applicant responded that it is anticipated that a maximum of 150 wood pallets would be stored within the recycling storage area at any given time,and has demonstrated on the site plan (Sheet BP-1) that the proposed storage area is located a minimum of 30ft away from this exterior door. January 16,2014 PREPARED'BY: ry Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner January 16.2014 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director Attachments: 1 Vicinity Map 2 Revised Detailed Development Plan (PC-1.0) 3 Proposed Outdoor Storage Area (BP-1) 4 Written Comment:Bob Davidson 5 Written Comment: Robert Stacy TIGARD RETAIL CENTER STAFF REPORT(PDR2013-00003) PAGE 10 OF 10 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 1/27/2014 r.. roc .."°' • r' VICINITY MAP 1 PDR2013-00003 Tigard Retail Center Walmart RecycNng Facility • tS +•••••"•."•••*•:+?ice ." 4 ,ti :„4**114:Selilt417.4 1/4.4 tit,•••i.is,,r4, ..x,..,,, ,... 04, S p . °4(1)1.7* t• ..•••••%••••4%,'•♦••"••s" '•••••••••�•�•�4"'i 4ti:0t•♦S+i"i*► Sub ect Site ∎Il0' ♦•••4••••A44♦"S••••0.• ..iii, 414••••�•• ♦�4. • ♦ •• �; �♦4 ••••"�4♦• s'►a"4 "'*•�L".'�•.4," •%aofi'•• •• • 4 $•♦+••••• •• 4) d • i:•••••••••••••••••i•i I `J{ _ SRE DATA BUILDING DATA P411O 4440---± 1� r REIM 1 12,0E0 VA 44ipMYIAM6 `.. e ^� t A1411i0t 111 iyj,�i [I4] 13)10 S! REM 0T gl 160 T�fit RPM.PALM NV HI,SW 1* .` a/arAYAS I RIM ) IAN KR COUNTY w1. / �'' I � � r (MIXED PARKNO DATA '- :--.. .�; `45!.—AG AGAR G6101' I I ERFLOYR@1T) R)M.1 onto vs PPM ARM 25,018A N l taro SIMOMO MIS M SIMJS 1 •, _ 251 - f 'w.MRCM Dan M m Ya.Y NO cpYr.n VW 823151 / _ •4 h 1„�AgA \45Y KC S 1131 mIRV mrs- a mosro.Ie.Mrtp.nla la 18225 hw.1m g1MaR�A 9}MU 1.3 R 1 Y N. Doll PMt4,RAID 52/1.000 4 l)K) (141100 R!Rap,AM/, / -- -`` PMOXLLY4UIIOK MS(0 M Wiu SIYOYO 51415 51 SiMLS I CO✓KI SIMS 1 STALLS ' i ,��' I r-10334 411.411014111[ I. f MOSS 511141.s MODES KQRRA SUM 151ALLS■ ( SSIir 5,5 Vel1.3 W A R)51415 �I1 I ! 7yf MX IAM6 M.P RO.R Y 49F0 BY CAR,LARKS' MIMIC RAM ST)/Id004 /f/i l ..F .Iy�ILOT 2 * t►e4141.4"1. .1'1'' S'j' S 1 nL °WWI MI5 �, ;a.R. I.OpO Y YYLY P4k NL RG10 RA�4/ IM . .11 I IIAt PIMICY 9AR 011ppgn LRA k$ � PMIRK RAKE 407HAG0 4 \0} � •• .f . R d 03 RP 1000 S(P4M 1.4)b1.B)0 •1. I` k-' _ •STM15 WV COM 44P44MC WtAL 91.4W 51MG2 a:)/AWO Y RATA /fp� S "'_ I a I� c -�. ' SI.M.F95 FOR tpMKt STALLS l': n t5�ic o In - 9 a n a� / LEGEND • 11 I�� I R �� IV- I -ti 1�I • ✓ - ' M ��P4vTSm 101.4 '+. • -HMK vY / 'I..j,. _� OH 11` � III ,..ITV+ a PwPHn LCURS a GUM �/ pP,l„�S /• . ,,,° 7 .I. ` R e " r' M � •• 1 a ICIU.3 PAPAW 8125 SOLO PER RCM "AMA 01 11/1.01 PMX414 514121YMHR Or 11/1.01 PM9M 51415 Ma RO. /• r I' , -ti" �' .a M. p� _I -• ` .Y MVAPWV'1'YTOL- III \` J .•[• t.�•+�y.wMfGS�.iaa�.� w1a5Hrry • \ Nor"SC>•ALR P.1(IRTII / J 1t ,i,4 - ' . -- Me wClaAL P.R4RRT410,4125 SNN I1RMS� J' I _ _---- r ,� a MSS.1.25541 11484 - 1 5 ` - 11I A•... — .. / ig V ar • + 41 '4iIM -kit 4Ma OPPACIOR V14 ifs'+ tYwc aMl I rcj� WTCdxu 'I 4 - _;,_.4,-''1 7 II1.11I1�/I I i„ �j rill;�${ , - fa:J.A. 6x 1252824 I ;.,7 ` 1 1 ! T !IaN h2'•'.�G�� ,Mw we J m 'f jil�� Lw-La .YM.1./a_R F ' °° 1 �"""� WW1 NMI..,4 4•...� _ LT° aJ dL.Mf'\; : S�.r..-' I ® mom Runs .` ww6R IYnIY Rttnu,sRwR¢ >•� .,.!; J• m ` -'CC zo.E I RUE ZONE 1mmr�n �-21.5411 Hi "� /�I BI PLOY @If) '-ROESTRAM KW MLA --' 1 125 MUM RnYR tin .. Sri_ ._ .4410E Man W4¢ i�•. .•. i / _a..-� 11". i 1r C f. 1 % I-. 1fR544a 11,VA� 'y' -.. o .' MIA { `�. .�. =I $ % q' I *`` LOT 1 y - ■ - K ,;. AW41.si5 ;, \FETAL14.`?, °: a l I 444403 �.4 \"\, Ymu 514 , - ,�;a W4M .. •'. 4 g�RM6 Y. a 1.(. M mat Kurz 1 111.111111a AL -R=PM`=-- D N. ----- .._` -::.--=-- _' D C) GRAPHIC SCALE g ,•••11, Z N • A a k g December 2013 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER REVISED DETAILED Tigard.Oregon PC-1.0 ..a4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN • 9 . 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I ■ al 1 'N V"..."V::.::.... '% ` • :\:S\:\ \ .':.:\,,,L.,* / ...-.,,,,?::.,.. ,..i... sia \ -;• /N.• . •...-. oN\ • ..\\..c.-.....::.......„,,A •,..• ...... s's '',::: . I tor . • :4 .., :::::::::::.... .:\„,.......::.., ••••#°'.....°.-' , :`, i i •... 11.— . r. . -, --. I:*:lt'i::::::::.>1:s,-:;::::::z§:„.:=-:-:=::----:::.=-:::::.-z---:.-:-----z---- ..; •.M.y 4 I AIL . I',,,, ,1104 P,$ , t , i p„._,„._-......._ „, , , ,:::: , , \ .. ..,.........,, :4, ;., „ „ __....„„_,_, , , , ::::,.\ \ \ \ PROPOSED 12X113'OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA ♦1t' 1►♦ ' ' Y yl. iFER ;;\ ` / \ W/10FT HIGH SCREEN WALLS OVER , 0'.:�,'♦Q'♦' l'..11%r : ': ' - ' PLAf?t APPROXIMATE 4FT RETAINING WALL • J:.∎ rip i i�; R I ` l' 1 7 ' :c* I' .■� + 1 � ..:.:: I minivAl 1 �, :::.. 100—YR STORM EVENT POND STAB LEVEL AT - :**��i I .-/ ELEVATION 17502 FT.1XE STORAGE FAOUTY 5 .�,:,i I %./� LOCATED OUTSIDE OF LEE FUNCTIONAL i I�....� `—� f-i `.I.- / i — CAPAOTY OF DE DETENTION FACRITY. `IOAyfr^' ='f ''.' ." ..• e 1 . / ;. . .y%1 ..... :1 Lt___f I; I i , 'r.'.'. .'�'_:o•,,n. . • PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA SCALE: 1'=20' Walmart:I. #5935-00 PROPOSED OUTDOOR T� 7600 SW DARTMOUTH ST STORAGE AREA BP-1 F T1GMD,OR 97223 ATTACHMENT Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS -Wal-Mart Modification Request Attachments: C70001268.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@tigard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (marry @tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS / COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that Wal-Mart is something of a "lightning rod" as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed, to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise, vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles (as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area, which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map &diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets, to cardboard recycling,to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/ deli operation of the Wal-Mart. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 The problem with this, is that "behind" their building is in "front" full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view, they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle& can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects,especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides, or a fully enclosed building ?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax bob@mmptig.com 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: Tigard Retail Center- Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012, well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months, with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note— I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day (a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos, they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at (503) 620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, Robert L Stacy, CPA 1 ATTACHMENTS " City of Tigard TIGARD Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: January 27, 2014; 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS 7:01 p.m. 4. OFFICER ELECTION(S)7:02 p.m. 5. CONSIDER MINUTES 7.121)-m- 6. PUBLIC HEARING —TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATIONS PDR2013-00003 7.15 p.m. 7. OTHER BUSINESS (COMMISSIONER INTRODUCTIONS) 8:15 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT 8:30 13.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA—JANUARY 27, 2014 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday,January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE:Tigard Retail Center - Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012, well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months,with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply,tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note—I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day(a rather sunny day)and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the"fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time,one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos,they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at(503) 620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, Robert L Stacy, CPA 1 Robert L Stacy, CPA 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE:Tigard Retail Center- Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012,well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months,with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note—I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day(a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos, they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at(503) 620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, 1 Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Attachments: C70001268.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@tigard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (marty@tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that Wal-Mart is something of a "lightning rod" as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed, to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise,vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles(as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area, which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map &diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets, to cardboard recycling,to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/deli operation of the Wal-Mart. 1 The problem with this, is that "behind"their building is in "front" full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view,they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle & can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects,especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides, or a fully enclosed building?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax bob @mmptig.com 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Monday,January 13, 2014 4:20 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Gary, Thank you for the additional info,you have been very helpful. I did not figure that there would be odors, but I want to look at worst case scenario. I plan on attending the meeting. I will probably also go over to the site and see Guy,the "super" at the Tigard construction site and see what he has on his set of plans. Thank You, Bob Davidson, Minuteman Press (503) 620-5203 (503) 620-5503 Fax orders @mmptig.comn To view our Promotional Products please click on the link below: http://377455.1ogomall.com/ From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:Garyp @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:26 PM To: Bob Davidson Subject: RE: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Bob, "CMU" is the generic term for concrete block or concrete masonry unit. According to the narrative,the storage area is for recycling of structural packaging materials. To my mind this would indicate materials that would not generate odors. The location of the storage area is along the main truck access around the store, which would need to be maintained as a clear area for fire access.Therefore,the area is sufficiently constrained such that storage creep or litter will likely be limited. Given that the concrete block wall for the storage area will be similar in material and color to the building, from your point of view approximately 100 feet to the south,the storage area should not appear as an additional structure in the landscape, but be rather unobtrusive. I would encourage you to come to the hearing if you have other concerns and want to hear from the applicant directly. Gary From: Bob Davidson [mailto:Bob @mmptig.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 12:10 PM 1 To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: QUESTIONS / COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Gary, Thank you for the prompt reply. I appreciate it. I have no idea what a "CM U" screen is. My concerns are what will be visible, noise and/or odor and/or litter from that activity. As I said earlier, the prevailing winds are 90%+ in my direction from that location. While it will be out of sight to Wal-Mat and their customers, my take on it so far is that it will be well within sight& sound & possibly smell of me and my customers. I fully realize that such operations typically take place at the back of any store. The "boiler plate" statement from their application about "sustainability, recycled and repurposed" is all fine and well and sounds really nice But you can save that on me, as I have worked in retail and trucking& logistics my entire life, civilian and military. The reality is that it is a normal, continuing and ongoing process that never ends with such large retail operations. But exactly because it is routine and ongoing and deals with "waste" products, doesn't make it harmless, beautiful or attractive. Usually it is just the opposite, and because it is "out of sight" to the majority of the store customers and employees, is exactly the reason that they are often a messy area. And, you can drive around to the back side of nearly any store and see a "less than pristine" environment that will support my sentence above. Thank You, Bob Davidson, Minuteman Press (503) 620-5203 (503) 620-5503 Fax orders@mmptig.com To view our Promotional Products please click on the link below: http://377455.1ogomall.com/ From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:Garvp@atigard-or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:06 AM To: Bob Davidson Cc: Marty Wine Subject: RE: QUESTIONS / COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Bob, I appreciate your comments and apologize that the notice was not more informative especially for an adjacent property owner such as yourself. I have attached the original digital version of the exhibit in the notice, which you can scale up to see all the details. The location of the recycling area is determined by the store operations and layout. All waste-related activities of the store occur at the back of the building. 2 The following description from their application may answer some of your questions: The proposed modifications would add a 12'x 113' outdoor recycling storage area with a 10' CMU screen wall to support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates.These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. Please call me if you would like additional information or to discuss potential off-site impacts of the proposed storage area. Regards, Gary Gary Pagenstecher, AICP Associate Planner Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-718-2434 Fax: 503-718-2748 Email:garyp@tigard-or.gov From: Bob Davidson [mailto:Bob @mmptig.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@ tgard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (martv@tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that Wal-Mart is something of a "lightning rod" as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed,to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. 3 I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise, vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles(as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area, which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map & diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets, to cardboard recycling, to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/deli operation of the Wal-Mart. The problem with this, is that "behind"their building is in "front" full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view,they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle&can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects,especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides, or a fully enclosed building?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax 4 bob @mmptig.com DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law, E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules `City General Records Retention Schedule." • 5 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: Tigard Retail Center - Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012,well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months,with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note—I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day(a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes,the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees' vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos,they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at (503) 620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, 1 Robert L Stacy, CPA 2 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS: FILE NAME: ,(Place a checkmark in the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified. CITY OFFICES C.D.Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director C.D.Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director City Administration/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs. Development Services/Development Eng.Mike McCarthy(Copy on all Notices of Decision) Development Services/Arborist ✓ Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer Public Works/Brian Rager,Asst PW Director Public Works/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1 Hearings Officer(2 sets) Planning Commission(12 sets) City Attorney ✓ File/Reference(2 sets) LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Mgr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224* City of King City City Manager,15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224* City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,POB 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034* City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director,1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201 City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,0.Gerald Uba,PhD,(CPA/DCA/ZON)* ODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safety Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179(Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land) ODOT,Region 1-Development Review Coordinator Carl Torland,Right-of-Way Section,123 NE Flanders,Portland OR 97209-4037(Vacations)* ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program,123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209 OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR 97208-3621(powerlines in area) OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310(monopole towers) OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201-4987 (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District,18330 NW Sauvie Island Road,Portland OR 97231 OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5,Portland OR 97232 OR Dept of Land Conservation&Dev.,Mara Ulloa,635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 97301-2540(Comp Plan Amendments&Measure 37) OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301-1279 OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301(Notify if property has HD overlay) OR Public Utilities Commission,550 Capitol Street NE,Salem OR 97310-1380 US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946(Maps and CWS letter only) Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA)"911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR 97007-0375(monopole towers) Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(general apps)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(CPA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Assessment&Taxation,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 9,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Mateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 14,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES Beaverton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics,16550 SW Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152 Century Link,Lynn Smith,Right-of-Way Manager,OR and SW WA,8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Portland OR 97219 Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer,1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,WA 98191-0000(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWM Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy,Hillsboro OR 97123* Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus,14200 SW Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005(See map for area contact) LCURPLNIMASTERSIREO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 08 13 13) Page 1 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS •e NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS • UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES(continued) Comcast Cable Corp.,Alex Silantiev,9605 SW Nimbus Ave,Bldg 12,Beaverton OR 97008(See map for area contact) Metro Area Communications Commission(MACC),Fred Christ,15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR 97006-4886(annexations only) NW Natural Gas Company,Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord.,220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991 Portland General Electric,Mike Hieb,Svc Design Consultant,9480 SW Boeckman Rd,Wilsonville OR 97070 Portland Western R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R,(Burlington,Northern/Sante Fe R/R predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GM,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294 Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock Nelson,503-249-3079) Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039 Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Portland OR 97281-0281 Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Mgr,15707 SW Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006* Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall,11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196* Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office,1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006* Tri-Met Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,710 NE Holladay St,Portland Or 97232(If project is within 1/4 mile of a transit route) Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005 *Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500'of the subject property for any/all city projects(Porject Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify) This document is password protected. Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates.Thank you. If this roster is updated,please update the corresponding mailing labels at I/CURPLN/Request for Comments Notification Labels PCURPLNIMASTERSRtEO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 08 1313) Page 2 of 2 MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Gary Pagenstecher, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: .+ 1 3`'() © NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2014-01 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION, PDR2013-00003 AMENDED NOTICE A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A" (with atchs), and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) listed as applicant or owner on the final order and at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit "B",and by reference made a part hereof,on February 4.2014,and deposited in the United States Mail on February 4.2014.postage prepaid. Y#114TECHER STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of . Qk -I r ,2014. J� � t OFFICIAL SEAL_ NOTARY P BUC-OREGON MISSION NO.475306 ,._ I�� EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03,2017 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: I 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 DATE OF FILING: 2/4/2014 DATE MAILED: 2/4/2014 CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2014-01 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2013-00003 Case Name: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION Applicant's Name/Address: PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road,Suite 300 Portland.OR 97222 Owner's Name/Address: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust. 2001 SE 10th Street. Mail Stop 5570. Bentonville, AR 72716-5570 Address of Property: 7600 SW Dartmouth Road.Tigard,OR 97223 Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington Co. Tax Assessor's Map No. 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200, 2S101BA, Tax I.ut 00101;and 2S101AB,Tax Lot 01400. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 27. 2014 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS,FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: ➢ The applicant requested a minor modification to the approved T� ard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001),which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. On January 27,2014, the Commission approved modifications to the Detailed Plan, subject to conditions of approval within this final order. Zone: C-G: General Commercial District with PD: Planned Development Overlay Zone. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755, and 18.790. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested ® Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ® Owners of Record within the Required Distance ® Affected Government Agencies ® Interested Parties ® The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard Permit Center at City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 4,2014 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 21, 2014 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section I8.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 20, 2014. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 718-2434. EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2014-01 PC IN PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR MINOR MODIFICATION OF DETAILED PLANS FOR THE TIGARD RETAIL CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/PDR2008-00001 (COMMISSION'S FINAL ORDER NO. 2009-02 PC). THE MODIFICATIONS WOULD ADD A 1,356 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING OUTDOOR RECYCLING STORAGE AREA TO THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE BEHIND THE WAL-MART BUILDING. THE COMMISSION HEARD AND APPROVED THE REQUEST AT ITS JANUARY 27, 2014 HEARING. THE PLANNING COMMISSION BASED ITS DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE AND PLAN SET (TIGARD RETAIL CENTER, OUTSIDE RECYCLING STORAGE AREA, UPDATED DECEMBER 11, 2013), THE STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION,AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE HEARING. 120 DAYS = 4/10/2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION CASE NO.: Planned Development Review(PDR) PDR2013-00003 (Minor Modification) APPLICANT: PACLAND OWNER: Wal-Mart Real Estate 6400 SE Lake Road,Suite 300 Business Trust Portland,OR 97222 2001 SE 10th Street Mail Stop 5570 Bentonville,AR 72716-5570 REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001), which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street west of SW 72nd Avenue; Washington County Tax Map 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 04200; 2S101 BA, Tax Lot 00101;and 2S 101 AB,Tax Lot 01400. '1'IGARID RI°1'.\I1.CENTER NIODIFICA11ON(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 1 OF 11 ZONES/ COMP PLAN DESIGNATIONS: C-G (PD): General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on die same site as a permitted use. -A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. (PD): The property has a planned development overlay designation. The purposes of the planned development overlay zone are: 1)To provide a means for property development that is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan through the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the City; 2) To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal,and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of—p strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; 3) To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits, while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning; 4) To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, water resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation of alternatives, conceptual review, then detailed review) that can relate the type and design of a development to a particular site; 5) To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of density requirements,which will balance the interests of the owner, developer, neighbors, and the City; and 6) To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainable and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. The MUE zoning district is designed to apply to a majority of the land within the Tigard Triangle, a regional mixed- use employment district bounded by Pacific Highway (Hwy. 99), Highway 217 and I-5.This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing; the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities, religious institutions, medical centers, schools, utilities and transit-related park-and- ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle,it is still important to 1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible; and 2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate intra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. The zone may be applied elsewhere in the City through the legislative process. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755,and 18.790. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 2 OF 11 SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed addition of the recycling storage area meets the applicable approval criteria of the Tigard Community Development Code and to ensure compliance imposed certain conditions of approval so that the proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, the Planning Commission APPROVES the requested Land Use Application subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE/BUILDING PERMIT. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher 503-639-4171, EXT 2434. 1. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a statement that truck service to, from, and inclusive of idling at the recycling facility will be restricted to lam to 6pm—daylight hours. 2. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a statement that all materials placed within the recycling enclosure will be stacked no higher than the top of the recycling facility screen (10 feet). 3. Prior to issuance of any site/building permit, the applicant shall submit a rodent/pest control plan for the store and loading/unloading area. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The subject site has been subject to a number of development proposals since the 1990s. Recently, the Planning Commission approved the Tigard Retail Center Detailed Plan (PDR2008-00001) with Final Order No. 2009-02 PC, effective June 17, 2009. The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 and 2) on an 18.16-acre site. A subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001) approved under Final Order No. 2010-01 removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. The site is currently under construction by Wal-Mart. Vicinity Information The subject 18.16-acre property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street, west of SW 72nd Avenue, and east of Hwy 217 in the Tigard Triangle (see Attachment 1). The subject site, zoned primarily C-G (PD) with a 0.45 acre parcel in the southeast corner zoned MUE, is surrounded on the north, west and east by C-G (PD) zoned land, and on the southeast by land zoned MUE. A 10.42-acre significant wetland associated with Red Rock Creek is located adjacent to the site on the west which buffers Hwy 217. Vacant developable land exists to the east fronting on SW 72nd, which was once a part of the previous approvals on the subject site. The area to the southeast, zoned MUE, is a neighborhood in transition where a number of residences have converted to commercial uses. Proposal Description The applicant requests approval for a minor modification to the approved planned development detail plan as shown in the Revised Detailed Development Plan, Sheet PC-1.0 (see Attachment 2). The proposed modification would add a 12' x 113' (1,356 square feet) outdoor recycling storage area at the rear of the site (see Attachment 3). The area would be contained within a 10' tall CMU screen wall T IGARI)RE1':VI.C1 NI1?R MODIFIC.VI1ON(P1)122013-00()03)PC HNA],ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 3 OF 11 and would support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, the facility will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposal would otherwise be consistent with the previously approved plan. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain predominantly discretionary approval criteria. Type III PC actions are decided by the Planning Commission with appeals to the City Council. As the proposal is a modification of Planning Commission Order No. 2009-02, the appropriate review is through the Type III-PC hearing process, pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050. SECTION V. NOTICE AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENT The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity to provide written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. On December 31, 2013 the City mailed notice to neighbors within 500 feet and other interested parties. On January 11, 2014, staff posted the subject site with a notice. In addition, the.January 9th edition of The Times included a notice of the Planning Commission hearing. Staff received two written comments from adjacent businesses: Bob Davidson, Minute Man Press at 7555 SW Hermoso Way (see Attachment 4) and Robert L Stacy, CPA at 7540 Hermoso Way (see Attachment 5) asking for clarification on the proposal with respect to the type of recycling activity and the adequacy of screening. SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The applicable review criteria for the proposed addition of a recycling storage area are contained in the following Community Development Code Chapters: 18.350, Planned Developments; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.620, Tigard Triangle Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage; and 18.790 Urban Forestry. Unless otherwise noted in the findings for these code sections below, the project is consistent with the approved 2010 Tigard Retail Center application (PC Order No. 2010-01 PDR2010-0001). Pursuant to Tigard Development Code 18.390.050.E.1, "Approval or denial of a . . . Type III action shall be based on standards and criteria, which shall be set forth in the development ordinance, and which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit application to the development ordinance . . ." This staff report to the Planning Commission is limited to the review of the code sections cited above and contains a staff recommendation for the Commission's review and decision on the proposed modification. 18.350— 'LANNED DEVELOPMENTS 18.350.060 Compliance with specific development standards. The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance with base zone provisions,with the following modifications: 1. Lot dimensional standards. 2. Site coverage. 3. Building height. 4. Structure setback provisions: 5.All other provision of the base zone shall apply except as modified by this chapter. TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 4 OF 11 No modifications to the base zone development standards have been requested with this minor modification application or with the original application approving the Tigard Retail Center. The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan, and continues to meet standards of the base zone provisions as described in the applicant's narrative and the finding in this staff report, below,in 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts. 18.350.070.A Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if all the following applicable criteria are met: 18.350.070.A.1 The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan. Minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; There is no residential component to the approved plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the lot coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in lot coverage through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. Parking is unaffected in the area where the storage area is proposed. This criterion is met. b. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; As described above, the net landscaping is approximately 0.6%greater than the approved detail plan. The amount of landscaping will not be reduced with the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The change involves a change in use; The proposed recycling storage area is an accessory use to the permitted retail use. No change of use is proposed. This criterion is met. d. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard; and The location of the proposed recycling area is between the perimeter service access road and the water quality swale at the south edge of the property. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. In addition, the proposed storage area is located approximately 30 feet north of the significant wetland buffer, or 80 feet north of the wetland itself. The proposed modification does not commit land to development that is environmentally sensitive of subject to a potential hazard. This criterion is met. e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. The proposed modification will not affect the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, or other site improvements of the approved plan. As mentioned under criterion (a) above, there will be a 0.5% net coverage decrease with the addition of the proposed recycling storage area and a consequent 0.5%increase in landscaping.The proposed change is minor. This criterion is met. TIC REF NI1.CI INTER MODIFICATION(PDR20131u 03)PC FINN.ORDER NO.14-01 PC P.1GIi 5 OF 11 FINDING: As shown in the above analysis, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan does not make the modified detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan. The detailed plan would remain generally consistent with the concept plan and can be approved. 18.350.070.4.b.(1) Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, e.g., between single-family and multi-family residential,and residential and commercial uses; The only adjacent property with a different type of land use is located to the southeast corner of the development. Although the adjacent property is zoned MUE which allows similar commercial use, the existing use of the noted property is residential. The approved detailed development plan provides a 20'buffer between any hard surface improvements or structures (pedestrian path) and the existing residential use of the property. The proposed recycling storage area is approximately 120 feet from the adjacent property to the southeast. According to the Buffer Matrix,Table 18.745.1&2, only a 10 foot buffer is required. The buffer will consist of groundcover, shrubs, trees, and hedges per the Buffer Matrix requirements and as shown on the approved plans (Sheet L-lb, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit).This standard is met. 18.350.070.4.b.(3) On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening. a)What needs to be screened;b) The direction from which it is needed;and c)Whether the screening needs to be year-round. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located approximately 100' from the adjacent property to the south, and approximately 120' from adjacent property to the southeast. In addition to the 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall, significant landscaping will be planted in the area between the property line and the outdoor recycling storage area (Sheet L-lb, Landscape Plan, 5/18/09 PC hearing Exhibit). The landscape trees in these areas will include evergreen trees that will provide additional screening year-round. The combination of the 10-ft high CMU screen wall, the landscaping with evergreen trees, as well as the distance of the outdoor recycling storage area from the property line,will provide adequate screening from the adjacent properties. This standard is met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan is generally consistent with the approved concept plan and may be approved. Buffering and screening approved with the detailed plan exceed the requirements in the code and together with the proposed 10-foot high CMU screening wall, will satisfactorily buffer and screen the proposed recycling storage area. The applicable planned development standards and approval criteria are met. 18.520— (COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.520.040 Development Standards A.All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370; The subject site is primarily zoned C-G(PD) with a small portion zoned MUE in the southeast corner adjacent to Hermoso Way. The proposed recycling area is located in the C-G(PD) zoned portion of the property. General retail use is permitted outright in both the C-G and MUE zones and the proposed storage area is an accessory use to the approved retail use and is therefore also a TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION(PDR2013-00003)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 6 OF 11 permitted use. The proposed modification is subject to the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district as reviewed below. The applicant has not obtained or requested any variances or adjustments. 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. All other applicable standards and requirements, as reviewed in this staff report, are met. B. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.502.2. The standards in Table 18.502.2 applicable to the proposed recycling storage area include: STANDARDS C-G (PD) Approved Proposed Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 0 ft - 100ft. 100 ft. Maximum Site Coverage (PD): 85% 80% 67.0% 66.4% Minimum Landscaping (PD): 15% 20% 33% 33.6% The location of the proposed recycling storage area is in the rear yard approximately 100 feet from the southern property line approximately 30 feet closer than the approved store wall and loading dock screen wall. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the proposed 1,356 square foot recycling storage area would minimally increase the site coverage by 0.2%. However, this increase is more than offset by an approximately 0.8% decrease in impervious area through minor design refinements to the approved plan such as reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store, and utilizing a porous pavement pathway for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site. The proposed modification meets the applicable development standards for the C-G zone. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed modification of the approved detailed plan with the addition of the 1,356 square foot recycling area meets the applicable Commercial Zoning District development standards. 18.620— (TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS) 18.620.040.A Building Design Standards All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. FINDING: As shown in the applicant's plans and narrative, the material proposed for the 10- foot screen wall around the outdoor recycling storage area will be painted, split faced CMU (concrete masonry unit) block. Foundation materials below or within two feet of finish grade may be plain concrete or concrete block as allowed by this section. This applicable Tigard Triangle Design Standards are met. 18.755— (MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE): "17GARD RE'E IL CENTER MODIFIC.Y17ON(1'DR2013-01x103)Pt:FINAL ORDER NO.1401 PC PAGE.7 OF 11 A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non- residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and I, the storage area must be able to accept at least all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. The approved development included indoor storage areas able to accept all "principal recyclable materials" (currently these materials include newspaper, ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, aluminum, container glass, office paper, and tin cans (OAR 340- 60-030)) for the operation of the approved Tigard Retail Center. The proposed outdoor recycling storage allows for additional management of materials to be recycled and/or re-used by Walmart. The applicant states that consistent with Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re- purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposed modification exceeds the principle recyclable materials provision. This criterion is met. 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. As noted in the approved 2008 application, the minimum standards method was used to adequately size the trash enclosures for the proposed retail pads for this site. The trash compactor for the anchor store building is based on typical building requirements of the anchor retailer. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on Walmart's typical requirements for being able to store materials that can be recycled and re-used. Walmart has an aggressive sustainability program which includes, among other things, the recycling and re-use of such things as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items are typically stored until such time that Walmart's delivery trucks return to the distribution center, at which time the stored items are loaded in the empty truck trailer and returned for re-use and/or recycling. Accordingly, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is not serviced by the typical franchised hauler and is only for Walmart's use. This storage area has been coordinated with the franchise hauler, Pride Disposal, who has indicated they have no objection to the outdoor recycling storage area. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area meets the minimum standards method of compliance. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance, described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. TIG;ARD 121:1 111.CENTER M1OD11.1(::1TION(PDR21113-(N nl3)P(:FIN 11,ORDER NO.14-( PC P:1GIi 8 OF 11 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be collocated with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C,design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. As shown on the applicant's site plan (Sheet BP-1) the proposed exterior recycling storage area is located to the rear of Retail 3 (Walmart) and south of the access road. The area is adjacent to and central to the truck loading areas of the store. A 10-foot CMU screen wall is proposed to screen that area from adjacent commercial properties to the south. The applicable location standards are met. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed recycling area will meet Walmart's size requirements, have adequately addressed the Uniform Fire Code standards, and will be enclosed by a 10 foot high split CMU screening wall. The applicable design standards are met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Access to the storage area will not require backing out of a driveway onto a public street. Adequate turning radii are provided to allow collection vehicles to safely exit the site in a forward motion. The TIGAR1)RE;TAI].CENTER 11ODIFIC VIMON(PDR2(113- soo3)PC FINAL ORDER NO.1401 PC PAGE 9 OF 11 proposed storage area will be serviced by Walmart or vendor trucks and not by the local franchise hauler. The applicable access standards are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed development complies with the applicable Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage standards. 18.790—(Urban Forestry): 18.790.020 states the requirements of this chapter apply to planned development (Type III) land use reviews. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The proposed modification to the site plan to include an outdoor recycling storage area is minor and is substantially similar to the approved site plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the project will not increase the previously approved site impervious area and therefore will not impact the open soil volume available to implement the approved landscaping plan. As shown in the applicant's narrative, the landscaping plan previously approved for the Target store and as coordinated with city staff during the site permitting review process will continue to provide approximately 38% effective tree canopy coverage for the site, in excess of the 33% minimum required for the C-G zone. The effective canopy area only takes into account trees that, at the time of planting, will meet the city's minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirement. It does not include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees that will be planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. The 33% canopy coverage requirement for the entire site is met with the minor modification for the outdoor recycling storage area. The applicable Urban Forestry standards are met. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Development Review Engineer commented that the proposed location of the recycling area may conflict with the full function of the adjacent detention pond. The applicant responded that no changes to the approved stormwater management system are proposed with this application. No additional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project since the overall impervious area of the site decreased from what was previously approved with the Target project. The proposed storage area is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. The drainage report, dated August 2008, submitted with the Target application provided a summary of the pond stage for various storm events. As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. TIGARD RI:T:V1.CENTER iv10DIPICX110N(PDR2013-(0()13)PC FINAL ORDER NO.14-01 PC PAGE 10 OP 11 SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified of the proposed modification and indicated that a required minimum clearance of 30ft must be maintained between the storage area and the exterior door on the south wall of the building in order to comply with Chapter 34 of the NFP1 Fire Code. The applicant responded that it is anticipated that a maximum of 150 wood pallets would be stored within the recycling storage area at any given time, and has demonstrated on the site plan (Sheet BP-1) that the proposed storage area is located a minimum of 30ft away from this exterior door. Attachments: 1 Vicinity Map 2 Revised Detailed Development Plan (PC-1.0) 3 Proposed Outdoor Storage Area (BP-1) 4 Written Comment: Bob Davidson 5 Written Comment: Robert Stacy SECTION IX. CONCLUSION The City of Tigard Planning Commission has APPROVED with conditions of approval, Planned Development Review (PDR2013-00003) —TIGARD RETAIL CENTER MODIFICATION. At its January 27, 2014 hearing of the proposal, the Planning Commission's motion to approve included certain conditions of approval that the Commission found warranted based on testimony from adjacent property owners' concerns for potential off-site impacts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE APPLICANT AND ALL PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS BE NOTIFIED OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. PASSED: THE 27TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. Jason Rogers,Planning Commission President Dated this day of February, 2014. I:\CURPIN\Gary\Site Development and PI)\PDR2013-IMMM13(Tigard Retail Center Modification)\PDR201400(101 PC Final Order.docx 'I'1G.1RD R1:T.U1.CENTER MODIFIC.VI1ON(P)122013-IMMM13)PC 1:1N.11,ORDER NO.1401 PC PAGE:11 OF 11 VICINITY MAP PDR2013-00003 Tigard Retail Center Walmart Recycling Facility toi•tioVix........i,..., .ct �.. . \ '••:•40••••••+4.41%*****eal."*VW*. 0 %+: ►,1.414::+.+�' +�++**46 ','� _••*w•O_A-.i►'i�.�� 444.*e + ' .��aa* : : sx.:• of .„w••.•'AM,•�4 • •••mss wt{i••�; Subject Site • �iw*'.�*z�••�; �'' ' '•►•.•••••44 . .•�ri� • .. 4.4 lk••1 kl‘4.••••:*•■•"•*AV 4 6% 0''"4 I ►+ +•••••• •i+•••► r •-• w••♦•w+ •w •"Or,••••i•••.••••4w$•4+ .•• 4i • • C PI me �.-. - 1Merm.en cm We map b lfe.,ener.l location one■ow be eerelee wen the -1 , e Sonless Olrieien. ' llIl ` ►V...L A ►a 1lven.`bole 1:4.000-I In a 333 R "-' �• d1 - ' / IN P�+nIEI et D1:11 PM on 17-0ea13 ■ U UNWIND MItitor mot OM MARAMrB THE Oft ern�ErREKLE IOUe a _41 Ai i 41.6........../ Loamy naipe�e;O OR e weroRmAnow MOwOED',EMROAEIS OF DUTY UUM Feet • �a� City aTIg.d a O TIGOri�PS 1rP9mM OHO 72233 n PI 503 639.4171 s --- ` eww.beerApr.eov - A �. I a / ..!.....!",• `Cl J h i BUILDING DATA `., SITE DATA WOW rnre y 4, t • •.-..'�—_ N 0�� m �-!v �IMi i 'z10°0m ii • I.�f _._ .. .'::.:. .7-f". C1.Mil Tot y]ml K! Il 3 IVAN!e tom.-�`�.. Ea6C6µ10;C0 1[IRIRJ fAY6W IC!_ "''!`SS tl TOM r 1116 AC*•' - M-., �` \`� LOAN SAM c-0 ZONE " MUE ZONE PARKING DATA % - E2;• — nar ACCESS ustvl,T I (dB6YL CaN6lCYL) °NIXED USE 'i `ss`r tslola.-eew ! BLFLOYME!!n NOTE$ Wild 1 pima Se avow nt.) _�' aLmwrr j S aaW SLAW STALLS•/ 416,1404- S _- 1 aOOC 4,D a One STY RCM.m m1[K'!STALLS r STALLS—.O,QTAL NRA Cplp 1�1 ' SPpSTO_K NISI APRIL 14 1m2 NW[0 ,�2 Van 3 STALLS 4�:': ,�ni ..`.' CQA Laub: Y 20m) TOTAL N STALLS M H. 'iYli ' "1 ALL C mT�IOR 5NE 1 CUM 4e aA064 ML) wawa NAM i67/1,036 7 i::...4::::,..••' • I I I I i,1 I 1 NOR =MCI S,KCS r 3 ',, y1 t111,,,,,,: "1 ALL UI csna rout e PmS SCOW WAGE a I011,r wYl;.. t I i Pada WIMP MOMS lam[nKl3 )Srk_ -°"`A. VIAL f2 STALLS 'O'.. '•'L; ! • ��fLRf fAe1K313rNi5 .MV.t lam Sn/1Cm 3 NAM Iii C' ! 1 NA.MSR STALLS CMCi A M.3 (US,fm[L Aaa1t TAW.) 4 (] - • • , a— STALLS ME r.1x a fait AS SUMV/0 STALLS 3m STALLS• • 7] .:i ft,I A� Y •� ,�I••�.. . . j uo WALT e•awWl tna wtx 1Ca WOW.aaatt cMl mwu slALls rnKls Matt WO 11 PER I M IS.La NW-,SITS M MO ,L. AM w STALLS 6ocel SF WM.RAMC RAM � 'I *l i ,' !L 1 " I °•,! I 'I I' Q I2 Pm 1,603 n arws Ma e) p,m0 9 C! Y '-'74-,r;"' , S + I I' U ..V m%S a WORM Prat ANAL S[6a STILLS ADAMS S Mm / ,! .� � 3 �— I` � � 61 — H 111111' I -r 1Cy151—/ STALLS OL.CORY TM 1W i P 1 .1.1< I ! I I<, H I{I NO PAIL sows FOR MP.s1Kls. / 1_, ��. �1 6 ,✓ _ - in. y N LE+ 'Q• � y� ,� i- jjj��''''���lll�I�IIIIII�I�III�Y�Y'Y��I y',xL�yy,,�',�f,',I�I� I Ti 'HI ,�..!. ,!, ,1'I 1 .... _ a r�rano[n MOM • ' /r ' !—i_' J ,I I M:! I I I •' l �..!, • j �M 1 as4mrla h!IY7-'' `,•��w �: - ! '; s �: . • 'M1: Rat 3PMaw sALls lST,u I MUE\i',7;.;V- I — — L ' 'a.L:.''' ..I. .. .., a II WM%*a UlnC1 PMO t nu3 Kt Ro. .., - -1._ - .. 3p 1"5 _I �!.1, `'— 140 aWCroLK RAN-1437 I1Ma,1cs I�e� ,qS[1� / I '.MFIIL' SV.1. �' •M`�� s InS.W • (d✓CT STALL IO ir4[fIRBrt-. w.MR'_r w ' a •casmr SUL, L 4 f ill, TW I I6W '�8l. , ,p ■WAIT mlPRao1 ti��j• �. 1.1 II11 1 I -YW IF11t'/Cai f �3 ��3 +,f I,I� r h _ :• •, ,r'E,<. I 'VA." 'Man 13n1r Woos S[uW Pw LDn[LMMp•[Cr ' g,�y.r .. IsuKr r.M • 4 ,--p �� W.16060 Y. 1e YY fOR.Ry4� _ • / j �w'�- ±�I I ! , I 1 ,3 n hg i 04; ,' MUE ZONE ,_I• ' `^_ . �. �-fuc r.E 33 ItR 4 (MIXED USE.iiiii, �. t.Im[aaw luv.an ... 'i a '� neloT Wu[ tS, Lfsm[tillscsm 'i' • ; ( �WMUERAJ . i _ _ RI6L iI ,1 r LOT .r II.111Pri.'tIC:...:::. \tic 0:5'. -41411 , ..'.,- A 0 kll 1 4 I 1:,.,!Porp , IAP CC XI. `''..■''._..—ON_11... ...■.■\.... .yam._= =._ .J.::..e. "'��SSuasr. __" s i a o GRAPHIC SCALE I rn • N �� ■ December2013 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER REVISED DETAILED •...,.,.. Tigard,Oregon P(+-1.O .:3.... '°;' DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 o- illitr � f ; /0,-1.., /L—\ -.:.....:.:... ::.:::..-...-. . .: • l I w4:# , ,\K" . .:.::::.::- NW \ �� ® my ��� � 1.x;1' ,; ``. '`\\\\;\ ,\, ••..., ... .., ... .,.„:„.:,,....,...... . to A Tv I �-- 1;,11,4* I.41 i' 41 i ' iiiiii, -�`;,�``.. `' > >\\\, i 74.1 • . 1 \ . +,414t.II■ , :°: ::' , roi ... .,, , ,.‘, , , , • PROPOSED 12101r OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA �♦11,���.�;�♦,1 �i I y A TpW�1FER y `` \ �,/ W/16T HIGH SCREEN WALLS OVER - • • f to 1 >: \ APPR010MATE IFT RETAINING MALL_ tI'♦.41 „I tP•o •i•• 7 �''.'. :::;$, i ' I 100-112 STORM EVENT POND STAGE LElfl AT •••••� i U Olelli::::::.:...„ ELEVATION 175.02 R.THE STORAGE FAaUTY IS •••••: ^ ..��,.- . LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE FUNC1 ONAL I;...•: J ,./ CAPAd1Y OF THE DETEN110N FACILITY ` H '� f +•• 141 , 1 : 1 7, .... ••••••,. '_/•• •;.lye.' • PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA SCALE: 1'=20' CITY OF TIGARD Approved I ] Conditionally Approved [ X 1 For only the woQk as de cribed in: PERMIT NOJ'rug. Is 'Oc 3 (=/WH-c. OROek. A. 1.°t1(-0I rc See Letter to: Follow [ 1 Attach [ ] Job e By G%3 !t Date: 2. ' H - e WaImart:1. 15935-00 PROPOSED OUTDOOR 7600 SW DARTMOUTH UTH ST STORAGE AREA BP-1 015)6599507 -02)L592227 TIGARD,OR 97223 •Pact• m — ATTACHMFNT3 Gary Pagenstecher From: Bob Davidson <Bob @mmptig.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 08, 2014 9:21 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: QUESTIONS/COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Attachments: C70001268.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Resent—I mis-entered your email address. From: Bob Davidson Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:10 AM To: 'Gary@tigard-or.gov' Cc: Marty Wine (marty@tigard-or.gov) Subject: QUESTIONS/ COMMENTS - Wal-Mart Modification Request Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, (cc to Marty) I am in receipt of the attached notice. I am one of 3 property owners that are most directly adjacent to the proposed modification. You are I am sure, aware that WaI-Mart is something of a "lightning rod" as the poster child of all that is wrong with big business. I personally do not hold that attitude and I am not now, or previously opposed, to their development of the property. It would be little different had the Target store gone forward at that site. I have however, endured 6 months of dust, dirt, noise,vibrations that rattle my building and smells from the ongoing construction. I have spent hundreds of dollars in funds and many hours of my time in cleaning my vehicles (as have my employees), parking lot, building, gutters and windows. When completed, it will be (I hope) an improvement to the past 10 years of weeds blowing in from the vacant lot and transients camping in the area, which has been our experience to this point. However, the attached notice is remarkable in its complete lack of detailed information or legible maps/diagrams, to the point that while it may meet the letter of the law for a legally required notice, it is completely lacking in real, specific information in which to make an informed decision. The map &diagram are basically illegible, even under 15 power magnification, which as a printing business owner, I have for examining our production quality. There is no elaboration or explanation of what constitutes a "outdoor recycling storage area". Why do they need a separate structure ?? Why is it simply not incorporated into their existing shipping and receiving facility ?? What is an "outdoor recycling storage area" ?? That could mean anything from stacking pallets, to cardboard recycling, to a bottle &can center to a food waste storage area from the grocery/ deli operation of the Wal-Mart. 1 ATTACHMENT The problem with this, is that "behind"their building is in "front"full view of the entrance to my building. Let us be brutally honest and call it what it is: It is a waste area. Wal-Mart wouldn't be putting it behind their building out of their public's view if it were not. If it were not something they were trying to shield from the public view, they could just as easily locate it in front of their building, instead of in front/full view of mine. If it is a bottle& can area, or a food area, I have concerns about litter, rodents and insects, especially if it not an fully enclosed building. It should also be noted that the prevailing winds in this area blow directly towards my location, so litter and odors are a specific concern, as well as possible vector problems. Is the area simply a roof with open sides, or a fully enclosed building ?? What landscaping/screening or wall enclosure is to be done to visually shield this waste area from my business and my customers ?? My business entrance is easily in view of this proposed area. Additional details would be appreciated. Without that, I am opposed to this change to the previously approved plan. Sincerely, Bob Davidson, Owner Minuteman Press of Tigard 7555 S.W. Hermoso Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-5203 Phone (503) 620-5503 Fax bob@immptig.com 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Robert Stacy <rls @rlscpa.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:02 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: Tigard Retail Center - Case ID Number: PDR2013-00003 Mr. Pagenstecher: My Name is Robert L Stacy. I own the property at 7540 SW Hermoso through my entity 7540 Hermoso LLC. This property is situated directly across from the proposed modification at the site, at the inside curve of Hermoso Way. I purchased this property in May 2012, well before the current development was started. Based solely upon the information I've received from you, I object to this modification. I have watched our view from our windows change from a very pleasant view of open space and green trees and shrubs to a rough building site over the last eight months, with not much progress on erecting the buildings themselves. We have experienced disruptions in our parking, our water supply, tearing up of our road right in front of our public driveway, lack of dust control affecting our vehicles and our building, among other things. None of this has been mitigated during this process. There is still an unpatched section of asphalt directly on the frontage of our sidewalks. Now it seems that the owner and/or developer wants to put a garbage area right below our windows. I do not think this is fair, and I don't think our CPA clients want to be looking at garbage and recycling while they are visiting us. So, unless this owner and/or developer can provide some method of odor control and visual concealment, I do not know that I could withdraw my objection. Note— I do not think that a fence will be sufficient concealment for this purpose— there would need to be some form of landscaping sufficient to conceal the proposed area from our view. I do want you to know about this dust control issue—it was and is real. A specific example is from October 11, 2013. I was working in my office at about 2:30pm that day(a rather sunny day) and looked out my window and it appeared that a white fog had moved in from out of nowhere. I stood up and looked again and could barely see across Hermoso Way to see our neighbors. It became apparent that the "fog" was not fog but was dust coming from the Development Site. Within about 5 minutes, the dust had cleared but had coated our entire building and all my employees'vehicles, some of which had the windows open. I then realized that this was not just dust... it was a compound the contractor was using in near a trench where some water, sewer or flood pipes had recently been laid. There was a tanker truck right at that point releasing a white dust compound and the wind that day was blowing the dust directly at us. What was amazing to me was the three or four individuals at the truck started releasing the compound again. This time, one of my employees was able to catch this action on a photo (attached). When the individuals at the tanker truck saw my employee taking the photos, they immediately ceased what they were doing, and did not release any more dust from that tanker truck while we were open for business. However, my suspicion is that they merely waited until after hours to resume what they were doing. I don't know what this dust consisted of, but it wasn't just dirt from the excavation. I'm hoping it wasn't something that could have adverse effects on our health. Again, I object to this proposed medication until that time with the owner can provide a mitigation plan for odor control and adequate visual concealment of this facility. I can be reached at (503) 620-1614 during regular business hours should you or others wish to discuss this with me. Sincerely, Robert L Stacy, CPA 1 ATTACHMENT 5 • PLEASE SIGN IN HERE Tigard Planning Commission T I G A R D Agenda Item # 6 Page _L of Date of Hearing 1—2.1- I f Case Number(s) P C\R a-0 -OOCO 3 Case Name V y.,ro)\ V-trt-m■ 1 C.e v■4e d` tAo& -c v-N_S Location ')G,c-r nr\au*-�n Sk .63 r 1 SC 01 2 If you would like to speak on this item, please CLEARLY PRINT your name, address, and zip code below: Proponent (FOR the proposal): Opponent (AGAINST the proposal): Name: \NameIQJ//J \©/J R C t L Address: Address: ?Ci'7.c S cc) }-kv}-k i14 bS o 1.4 City,State, Zip: City, State,Zip: .ic) 3 Name: Name: O A c( 0)4 1,14c0),„( Address: Address: 7 5�v1`j 5r Lo, ffe_Ampro r City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: 71 6A-AA ? R3 Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State,Zip: City,State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City,State, Zip: EXHIBIT B2-40 PLEASE SIGN IN HERE Tigard Planning Commission TIGARD Agenda Item # (, Page of Date of Hearing —27 - l� Case Number(s) POR 3- DOOQ Case Named y rik Location kL 1- SCO Oci(A c If you would like to speak on this item, please CLEARLY P RINT your name, address, and zip code below: Proponent (FOR the proposal): Opponent (AGAINST the proposal): Name: ante: $I l 11111! Address: Address: 133 Z° St,/ /274 /Q}¢- City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Tit,' OP- ' Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City,State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State,Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City,State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City,State, Zip: • I COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland,OR 97222 PO Box 22109 Portland OR 97269-2109 Phone:503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 • ' E-mail: legals @commnewspapers.com i IR:,w, I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION -1 I G A R D State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS • i =_ I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: depose and say that I am the Accounting The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Commission on Monday January 27. 2014. at 7:00 PM at Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., general circulation, published at Tigard, in the Tigard, Oregon. aforesaid county and state, as defined by Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedure adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony City of Tigard may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or Notice of Public Hearing/PDR2013-00003 verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in TT11881 person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the A copy of which is hereto annexed, was hearings authority and all the parties to respond on the request, published in the entire issue of said precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at newspaper for which a comment is directed precludes an appeal to the Land 1 Use Board of Appeals based on that criterion. week in the following issue: A copy of the application and all documents and evidence January 9, 2014 submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at (, k(1)-I (2.. .� ;;� . Li least seven(7)days prior to the hearing,and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manager) Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher) at 13125 SW Subscribed and sworn to before me this Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223,by calling 503-718-2434,or January 9, 2014. by email to ganp!aaigard-or.gov. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 7 ) - ) (PDR)2013-00003 d cL, -TIGARD RETAIL CENTER- NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification My commission expires ,_-5'. k, 1 l/ /( to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 Acct#10093001 � � ��� ;_��? square foot retail building(Retail 3)and two additional 12,000 Attn: Gary Pagenstech OFFICIAL SEAL ( square foot retail buildings(Retail 1 &2)on an 18.16-acre site City of Tigard (' RENE R MULLER 1 currently under construction by Wal-Mart.The proposed modi- 13125 SW Hall Blvd '• NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON () fication would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor COMMISSION NO.471574 O recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Tigard, OR 97223 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 11,2016(� Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent `'� `�'�-`^—"`�"�- _-``- �` -' with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Size: 2 x 12" Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001), which removed all Amount Due: $200.40* Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building eleva- *Please remit to address above. tion drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street, west of SW 72na Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map (WCIM) IS136CD, Tax Lot 04200, WCTM 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101,and WCTM 2S I O I AB Tax Lot 01400.ZONE: C-G (PD) General Commercial District with Planned Development Overlay; MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755,and 18.790. Vp 'AV' s S I Publish 01%09%2014. TT11881 3&vrt i4it. r2-- 3r- /3 II • City of Tigard PLEASE PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS TIGARD SECTION OF THE TIGARD TIMES, THE FOLLOWING: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday January 27, 2014, at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code,and the rules of procedure adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all the parties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing,and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223,by calling 503-718-2434,or by email to garyp(a)tigard-or.gov. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2013-00003 - TIGARD RETAIL CENTER - REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 & 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001), which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 - building elevation drawings.LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street,west of SW 72nd Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map (WCTM) 1S136CD,Tax Lot 04200,WCTM 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101, and WCTM 2S101AB Tax Lot 01400. ZONE: C-G (PD) General Commercial District with Planned Development Overlay; MUE: Mixed-Use Employment. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755,and 18.790. TT PUBLISH DATE: JANUARY 9,2014 (PLEASE PUBLISH THE VICINITY MAP INCLUDED WITH THIS EMAIL WITH THIS LEGAL NOTICE. THANK YOU.) VICINITY MAP PDR2013-00003 Tigard Retail Center Walmart Recycling Facility .•iiii -., ••00.4 R rM 0 u : .�.:r.0i❖.❖•..., r \,. •••..••....••...... N S T :•❖.:...:•:•❖•❖.:.•.•.:.•:.:.:.:.:is::. `•'.'i•i'i'i•i•i'i••i•i•i•i•i•i•i•i•i i•ii•ii•+ ..•.••.Q•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•..............��.�• •,����..����•X��������N�:4.*����������� Subject Site „fi'.00w ' .-4.- k•::::::•::+:**+::+::::+::4 aid : Illit •••••❖.••❖••.'.❖.❖•'..+•❖••••••+.....,aft Sill la MOSO WAY i , 111 t IMwmo�YMyeas�tlm M...p..b..wth bCMOn d..... .,k..,,,. �,. i re roro,sa.,.„000.,in,33,1. Ill SEVELAND R "� a.+.aao, v..m,7-0w,3 Feet ,3,i swa ill. C C r 11iA���►S rya on•nr3 . 3636+,1, ,ii j 111 Vii AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE , OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL TIGARD IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: PDR2013-00003 Land Use File Name: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER I, Gary Pagenstecher.Associate Planner for the City of'Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 7515 SW Hermoso Way: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map (WCTM) 2S101AB Tax Lot 01400. and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s)by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 11th day of January.2014. VL Signature of/ tI s olWho Performed Posting h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday January 27, 2014 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedures adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-718-2434. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2013-00004 - TIGARD RETAIL CENTER - REQUEST: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008- 00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 & 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001), which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. LOCATION: The property is located south of SW Dartmouth Street, west of SW 72nd Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map (WCTM) 1S136CD, Tax Lot 04200, WCTM 2S101BA, Tax Lot 00101, and WCTM 2S101AB Tax Lot 01400. ZONE: C-G (PD) General Commercial District with Planned Development Overlay. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non- conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports,medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. (PD). The purposes of the planned development overlay zone are: 1) To provide a means for property development that is consistent with Tigard's Comprehensive Plan through the application of flexible standards which consider and mitigate for the potential impacts to the City; 2) To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal, and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; 3) To achieve unique neighborhoods (by varying the housing styles through architectural accents, use of open space, innovative transportation facilities) which will retain their character and city benefits,while respecting the characteristics of existing neighborhoods through appropriate buffering and lot size transitioning; 4) To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities (trees, water resources, ravines, etc.) through the use of a planning procedure (site design and analysis, presentation of alternatives, conceptual review, then detailed review) that can relate the type and design of a development to a particular site; 5) To consider an amount of development on a site, within the limits of density requirements,which will balance the interests of the owner, developer, neighbors, and the City; and 6) To provide a means to better relate the built environment to the natural environment through sustainable and innovative building and public facility construction methods and materials. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.755, and 18.790. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING P In TIGARD I, Gary cPaaggenstecher being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, `Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR:V`;/ TYPE IIIB - PDR2013-00003 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer x Tigard Planning Commission January 27, 2014 ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'0', and by reference made a part hereof, on December 31,2013,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 31,2013, postage prepaid. r (Person that Prepare otice) STATE OAF'OkEGON ) County of'Washhington )ss. City of igard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ' ' -c-.C57--m\0 ,tom 2013. I ,401al<.. OFFICIAL SEAL 9 ( COMM SS ON NO.475 06 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03.2017 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: . - ,Cl Notice of a Public Hearing — Type IIIB Planned Development Review T 1 A 1z° Tigard Retail Center - Case ID: PDR2013-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Tuesday,December 31,2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434 Garyp @tigard-or.gov Development is proposed in your neighborhood that requires a land use review.The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing beginning at 7:00 pm on Monday,January 27, 2014 in the Town Hall of the Tigard Civic Center at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Anyone wishing to present written testimony on this proposed action may do so by sending it in writing to Gary Pagenstecher. We need to receive your written comments by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday,January 14, 2014. Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: PDR2013- 00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person:Gary Pagenstecher.Anyone wishing to present oral testimony may do so at the hearing. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant requests a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The approved plan includes a 137,900 square foot retail building (Retail 3) and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings (Retail 1 & 2) on an 18.16-acre site currently under construction by Wal-Mart. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot freestanding outdoor recycling storage area to the south end of the site behind the Wal-Mart building. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit and subsequent Minor Modification (PDR2010-00001), which removed all Target-related details from the original Retail 3 building elevation drawings. Applicant: PACLAND (Owner's Agent) Owner 1: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Proposal Address: 7600 SW Dartmouth Street Legal Description: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map(WCTM) 1S136CD,Tax Lot 04200,WCTM 2S101BA,Tax Lot 00101,and WCTM 2S101AB Tax Lot 01400. Zoning: C-G: General Commercial District(PD) MUE-1: Mixed Use Employment Districts Approval Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350,18.390,18.520,18.620,18.755,and 18.790 What You Should Know About This Type IIIB Proposal This proposal requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period or through oral testimony at the public hearing. City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1 The Community Development Department will be making a recommendation to the Planning Commission on this proposal;our staff report and recommendation will be available for review at least seven days before the hearing. The final decision will be made by the Planning Commission after consideration of the staff recommendation, relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period and at the hearing. The Planning Commission's decision will be mailed to the applicant and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. Public Information Requests: A copy of the application, documents and evidence considered will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material at no cost, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials,city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Public Comment and Hearing Process Information The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.390 and rules of procedure adopted by the Tigard City Council which are available online or by request at City Hall. At the hearing, the Planning Commission will receive a staff report presentation from the city planner, open the public hearing and invite both oral and written testimony. The Planning Commission may continue the public hearing into an additional meeting in order to obtain more information or may close the public hearing and take action on the application. If evidence in support of the application is submitted less than seven days prior to the public hearing,any party is entitled to request a continuance of the hearing. If there is no continuance granted at the hearing, any participant in attendance may request that the record remain for at least seven additional days after the hearing. Appeal Information Failure to raise any issue regarding this proposal,either in person or in writing prior to the close of the public hearing, or failure to provide testimony or sufficient evidence to allow the hearings officer to respond to the issue, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor,or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. Final Comment Deadline at 5 pm: Tuesday,January 14,2014 120 days = Thursday,April 10,2014 Assistive Listening Devices and Interpreters: Assistive listening devices are available by request. The city will also endeavor to arrange for a qualified sign language and bilingual interpreters upon request. Please call 503-639-4171, extension 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD — Telecommunications Device for the Deaf). Please make these arrangements at least one week prior to the public hearing. Site Map City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 I I VICINITY MAP } — e PDR2013-00003 Tigard Retail Center Walmart Recycling Facility •+++Oi+ s++ +♦ ,+∎.+4!+++ ,. ++O+i+• A++++++• + ►.. .• •7.. R 7-0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++■++++++•++,+.,,,. . s r ∎•+i Site Map ......1gM..........r.MM....,-.w\s..mac r u,cu-n... -, 1 I - 1 1 ^`\ I - I - 1 . 1 n I - I - LI \_ r I/1 \.1 1 w .....„. IZ-..:--- ---.,,,...Z.---a:-1,3,7,4— �E r_1..0 I k + i i ''' L` 11 ,' 12 a f 1 1 1 ;111 111 ff 1 1.!!. Ism' I q 1 I it ) r - ,� Comments: City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.3 I/CURPLN/FORMS/Q1 Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12 f AH3AV-09-008-1 ,„dn-dh„ piogaa al aalanaa luawa6aeup"suas ®L9LS®A83AV 1!aege6 al zas!I!ln woyAJane•MMM ap w;e ainum4 el a zaydaa ; ry Jalad a salnel sallanbll3 2S101AB01604 2S101BD00100 ILLINIWEST LLC PNWP LLC#2 123 RAVINE RD PO BOX 2206 HINSDALE IL 60521 BEAVERTON OR 97075 2S101AB01200 2S101AB03200 KRANK CONSULTING INC RED ROCK BUSINESS ASSOCIATES LLC 7275 SW HERMOSO WAY 23077 SW NEWLAND RD TIGARD OR 97223 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 2S101AB01501 2S101AB01700 LIONEL LLC ROTH, LINDA A 7555 SW HERMOSO WAY STE 010 7420 SW HERMOSO WAY TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136DCO2503 2S101AB01605 LURIA, MARK T ROVIG, CAROLE A WHEELES, DOYLE E 7460 SW HERMOSO WAY BY PETSMART INC, PROPERTY MGMT TIGARD OR 97223 19601 N 27TH AVE, 4TH FLOOR PHOENIX AZ 85027 2S101AB01402 2S101AB01500 LYMAN, KYLE M SJP LLC 7395 SW HERMOSO WAY 7615 SW BEVELAND RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101AB01401 2S101AB01600 LYMAN, KYLE M SPAAN, HARLOW TWIGHT 7355 SW HERMOSO WAY SORG, N JEFFREY PORTLAND OR 97223 24 AQUINAS LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 2S 101 AB01601 25101 BD00200 LYMAN, KYLE M TIGARD DISTRIBUTION CENTER LLC PO BOX 231026 4800 SW MACADAM, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97281 PORTLAND OR 97239 2S101AB02703 2S101BD00302 MCCAFFERY FAMILY TRUST TIGARD, CITY OF 7450 SW BEVELAND ST STE 100 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S 101 AB01606 1 S 136DC04200 MIF LLC TLB LLC 7357 SW BEVELAND RD#200 PO BOX 25716 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97298 2S101AB01300 1S13.0C!4300 MM SHINMEN LLC TLB L 24600 SW MOUNTAIN RD PO BOX •716 WEST LINN OR 97068 PORTLAND OR 97298 r L9LS Wla6P3 dn-dod asodxa rte_ Jaded paaj ®L9LS aleldwal®tiany asn ® ®J1t13/�10/O of au!! 6uole puce memo f slagei aped Meg Easy Peel Labels Use Avery®Template 5161® • Feed Paper 5£OL6 HO 093MSO 3)IV1 9L91 X09 Od 011 OSOWH3H 209108 V 1.01.S Z £ZZL6 HO OHV911 AVM OSOWH3H MS 0LZL IVIN 8 NVIH8 'NV1HVH £09108V1OLSZ bOZL6 HO ONV11HOd 002#NOSIHHOIAI MS LZL 9NIH3H 3)IV18 'NllV NOSdINIS'8 S9039 SIHHON A8 00IN9H £OL0008101SZ OLtLO f N 3NAVM AVM A3Hdd039 3NO Sfl„H.SAO1 A8 011 S3I1H3dOHd 3ddVHI9 000Z0009£LS L OLOL6 HO 3111ANOS1IM 10 OOOM)IHVd MS 170601 SHl 2:1313d Sf1V1NNI13NHOO 'NO5819 A8 1SfHl 318VOOA3H A11WVd NOS819 Z09108VLOlSZ 90ZL6 HO 0NV11HOd 113MOd 3S 9£817 ONI 39VHOIS 0NV NVA 301S 1SV3 b0100081OLSZ 9998Z ON OHO S3>11IM HIHON 141.1./X09 Od (£vl)ld () 'Vi 'NI1V ONI 'N3OHV9 '8 3HvMa2ivH 319V3 LOLZO8Vl0LSZ 99982 ON OHO8S3)I1IM HiHON L1LLX03Od (£v1)1d30 XVI NI1V ONI 'N30HVO'8 3HVMOHVH 319V3 OOLZ09VLOLSZ LZ086 t(M HVfOVSSI 0 )IV-i 666 L L L 1d30 XV 83dOHd NOIIVHOdHOO 31VS31 HM O1S00 00ZOOd810LSZ LZ096 `>fM HVf10VSSI 0 31V1 666 L L L 1d30 XV H3dOHd NOIIVHOdHOO 31VS31O.lM O1S00 10210 8101SZ Etiquettes faciles a peter & Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens ri"chargement Bend along line to expose Pop-up EdgeTM OAVERY®5161® LZ086 VM Hvf10vssi HO 3>IV1 666 1.1.1. 1d3G XVI A.H3dOHd NOIIVHOdHOO 31VS310HM 001S00 00ZZ0009£LS1- LO9 C 1J OONV1H0 006 31S '3AV 39NVHO S 0917 ONI 'AI1V32i 3SV31 13N 1VI0H31NWOO 009170009£LSI. Repliez a la hachure afin de £ZZL6 HO OHV9I1 AVM OSOWH3H MS 9£17L M AH0903H9 `113M100 £otl0edl01sz 990L6 HO AONVS OA18 HOIOOHd 9L69£ >iNVB AINf100 SVVlVkOV1O 00£OOVOLOLSZ 990L6 HO AONVS 0A18 H0100Hd 9L68£ >INVB UNl0O SVAIV>IOV10 Z01700V81OLSZ 990L6 HO AONVS 0A19 230100Hd 9L68£ >INV8 AUNf100 SVINVNOV10 001700VeLOLSZ CZZL6 HO OHV011 AVM VSOVIH3H MS 08£L 9 301H1V38 E 3N39 `LNH308 009108VLOLSZ £ZZL6 HO OH110I1 3AV ONZL MS 9££ZL H3fV8 0 VHV8HV8 001109VL01.SZ 60ZL6 HO ONV11HOd 901#31S 3AV 1NOHd MN 09L ONI S31HISIlONI NVOIH3INV bOgZ0009£15l £ZZL6 HO OHVOII AVM OSOINH3H MS Ob9L 011 OSOINH3H Ob9L L09I.09V1.01.SZ www.avery.com reveler le rebord^,o-up" 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper 90L£9 01 3S108 9919 X08 Od 1N3W1HVd30 XVI =N11V 011 O©Od OONIM 009P0009£LS1. 50L£9 01 3S108 99L5 X08 Od 1N3INIHVd3G XVI N11V 011 000.d OONIM 00£170009£LS1. £ZZL6 a0 0NV11HOd 3AV ONZL MS 991721 011 'NHOH131IHM 006L08VL01.SZ Z9ZL6 a0 ONV11HOd 61929 XO8 Od SOdM A8 011 'SONIO10H OHVSI! N831S3M 909L08VL0LSZ £ZZL6 a0 OHVSII IS S8f18ONVS MS 0969 £Z ON 10181SI0 100HOS AlNflOO NOIONIHSVM 00610OVl0LSZ 17£L£9 OW SIl011S 810 AVMNHVd G1HOM 9L9t7 XVI 38 NO11VM-10110 A9 011 9 08 )IHVd HOMO NOl1VM 001710981OLSZ Etiquettes faciles a peter A Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement Bend along line to expose Pop-up EdgeTM \AVERY05161® ; 9LLZL aV 3111ANO1N38 9990 SIN NIIV 0 X08 Od 00-9£69 3HOIS Id30 XVI Al dOad A9 al SS3NISf18 31V1S3 1V3 1 VIN-1VM 00171.0 VLOLSZ 91LZL HV 311IANOLN38 9950 SIN,IVay 0909 X08 Od 00-9£69 3801S 1d30 XVI A183808d A8 al SS3NISf18 31V1S3 1V32i lHVW--1VM OOZ170aokLSL 9l-LZL HV 3111ANO1N38 9S90 SIN N11V 0508 X08 Od 00-5£69 3HOIS 1d30 XVI Al83dOHd A8 al SS3NISf18 31V1S3 1V3H 1HVIN-1VM 1OL00V8LOLSZ £ZZL6 a0 OHVOIl AVM OSOINH3H MS 9LPL 3, HVtN f NIAHVIN 'H31HON3HNOA 17017L08V101SZ £ZZL6 HO OHVSII OH ONV13A38 0117L 11 OHVSII JO S31183dOHd 319NVIH1 POLZO8V10I.SZ Repliez a la hachure afin de reveler le rebord pop-up" £ZZL6 HO OHVOIl Oa ❑NV13A38 MS 905L S311a3dO8d 31SNVIHI 609108VL01.SZ 61.ZL$, 1:10 ONV11HOd GA18 a Wig MS 5958 IHVM31 iSWVOV A8 1Sflal 831N33 Nf100-Ni lONNOVSLOLSZ 61ZL6 80 ONVTlHOd 0A18 Hf18HV I1S 9958 IHVM31'SINVaV A8 al a NO,a�I S 'NIIHVIN 1Sflal 831N30 AiNl00-lal LOL008V1.0LSZ 6LZL6 HO ONV11HOd 0A18 al8HV8 MS 9998 IHVM31S 8 SVIVOV A8 al a NO08O0 'NIIHVIN 1Sflal 831N30 AINflOO-N± 00100V810LSZ 86ZL6 80 ONV1LHOd 9LLSZ8 Od 011 811 ZObbOV 9£L S L www.avery.com 1-800-G0-AVERY A83AV-O9-008-L ,Wdn-a..a paogaJ al aalanai ? luawa6ietp oN suas ®19LS®AH3AV luege6 al zasll!Nl u,aow(aane•nnnnAA ap w;e aany)ey el a zalldaa ; • rated e sali,e;sauanb4 DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested notice 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE re.ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigard. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012. BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114x"PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 4B MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133R°AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND, CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOTt Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 121ST AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 { ®1915®A?J3/�d��} Wla6P3 dn-dod asodxa T�� Jaded peed 001,s aleldwaj®tianV asn o.aull 6uole puae =Nom • staged®Iaad Ase3 A J AV-09-008-L Jalana.i ;uawa6.ietp of,sua5 ®L9LS®AH3AV Wege6 al zasl11311 wortianC MMMM ap up a.intpey el c zalldad I p Jalad a salve;sazlanbli4 ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH GLENNA THOMPSON 10236 SW STUART COURT 13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD, 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1sT AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 DAVID KIMMEL VICTOR DEFILIPPIS 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 13892 SW BRAYDON CT PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97224 /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 Wia6P3 dn-dod asodxa f� Jaded paa3 ®L9L5 a;eldwal®tiany asq ®L9LSOMMAVO awl buole puce I mimi r slage3®laad Ase3 Aa3AV-09-008-1. ,Wdn-c._U pogo.'al aaianaa T tuawa6ie p o sua L91s AU3AV ILie e6 a zesi 411 woYAaane•MMM 4 P 5 ® ® q I I. op ul;e aany�ey el a zalldaa ; • aalad a cape;sananbl;3 Persons listed below want to be notified about EAST side No persons currently want to be notified about SOUTH development ONLY: or CENTRAL development ONLY: Jim Long, Chair, CPO 4M 10730 SW 72nd Ave Portland, OR 97223 DAYLE D.& EVELYN O. BEACH 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 CURPLN/Setup/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 wla6P3 do-dod asodxa T�,i� Jaded paaj ®L9Ls aleldwai®A.iany asn 0101,91.58AZJ3AVS o;aul ua 6uo e I I P 8 , Immo ♦ ®laad Ase3 APPLICANT MATERIALS I I s City of Tigard Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY: TIGARD IFile# I PQ2Dt3-cXo)O3 Other Case# 1 Date I it I i4113 I By Receipt# Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR I ❑Adjustment/Variance(II) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(II) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) I ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) tiep lanned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Downtown Design Review(II,III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or III) NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WIIL OCCUR(Address if available) 7600 SW Dartmouth Street I TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. 1S1S136CD-04200, 2S101BA-00101, 2S11AB-01400 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION 18.16 ACRES C-G, MUE APPLICANT' PACLAND (Owner's Agent) MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 ValeZ LAW D, op a -Z PHONE NO. FAX NO. 503-659-9500 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Shawn Nguy E-MAIL snguy @pacland.com I PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP II2001 SE 10th Street, Mail Stop 5570, Bentonville, AR 72716-5570 PHONE NO. FAX NO 479-273-4000 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) See project narrative. I ICity of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. 1 • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). ' SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date • Owner's Signa e Date //3 Applica u t/ t/R--•resentative's Signature Date , Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date • City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 r P091101 OF 1/2'P PORRON OF sAr R RECORD OF SURVEY-PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT i AS SET w'PALMER r/7PC'THOMAS ACRES'µRI 5740491�� /RPnaT NC'w MOO. BOUNDARY LINE TABLE S1 31543 3 SAS SHOW ON SN LINE BEARING LENGTH LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, rsr4V50 LI N4052'28'E (42.811 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST AND THE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST L c,c aao..u�ayr) L2 N5173'03'E (33.41) QUARTER OF SECTION 36,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST OF THE 14 DID.LEM.-(730.241 L3 N0524'45'E (34.15') WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. L3 5 6=3805'41' L4 S87'54'31'E (17.36') 12 R=(547.00) L=(363.69') 1.5 N1921'52'E (7.92') CITY OF TIGARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON STATE L1 CID.BUG.=S5457'S4'E L6 56227'41 41 (37.61') NaMHENTS SET APRIL 9,2012 DO.LEN=(u7.o3') S36, TLS, R1W, W.M. P05(11a1 a FARO r , 1001 OF WAY PER DECD DO0RENTS 31794 1x45' -- ----I 99114505,99118496 a 99118497 P.M71Y1E,1.9'FRa1 1/n AS AS 5. POSITION _ G AS AS WW1 191 -- x Ilse! ORIGINAL LINE { I POSITION OF t'BRASS 2450 N 6.2227'19' $ SW p NN 800.HELD FOR EAST LINE 07 °m R=547.00' 1-214.38' 'QR A E 7 P09T40N CF 5/Y R W/PPC THE GEO.RICHARDSON D.LC 38(CE CHD.866.-S4706'43'E S7 --1------7"/PM S OF SW 72ND AVENUE HEADING z INC:IN I CHD.LEN.-213.01' I 4 44£ 4�44T-- �EE7 11800 BOX US 2(7 554 SW Sam)AND THE WAN UNE DE �T 35 36 .-_ N79T7!'3g I (3325?• (71684'` x6611 AND 9401111 w 91 99301 M w AR 1ISe 0CTRw 1 AS 3 _ N61Z6'1ri 197. �W 36 ) 31x) Ln (x6U.151 ___ 1= -- OJ__ __ S8K33'1NY` '^ 2 t `r 3jE------ (799377 SEE DETAIL) NI055'02'E 1 Fain 2'BRASS Dix ON a ADJUSTED (35.011 N z FaAO 3-1/4'ALUMNUM ax. A 2'P N RCM Sox. SHEET 2 85.83' FOUND 5/8'IR W - NORMIEST COTNER O 1S136CD-04200 W MOWN QUARTER CORNER PEE,AS 5491 (2..x41 - -- SECIILN 1.SEE WAL-MART REAL SECTION 1.SEE'HORIZONTAL 02 91CJ3'16t c gE maK2a17At ---- ESTATE BUSINESS -""11 o DAnN/cwTRat,'SHEEt x 84524 31x! In c3 9.0 DA6m/C 4IR0L'SHEET x TRUST r " a-022-024 111,580 SO.IT 1n £ O 25101E1A-00KM m a: rc_o2x-0x3 ',$� 52 ."R p ADJUSTED 2.56 ACRESt .N MI-COUNTY CENTER ig =a 134,322 SO.FT. E C 25101E1A-00101 N8923'46'w� TRUST S 3.08 ACRESt 2- WAL-MART REAL --5°°�rie� U95x1 _ ' Po9nat a 5/8'R w/NPC i< 251019 8-00200`. - ESTATE BUSINESS___ ! 107.80') 480x1 '1140MAS WRIGHT.NC.'N m COSTCO WHOLESALE i TRUST 'Y i OS qw IN SN W/RPC 31583 I SCR S 2411 y CORP I N89.46.22'w nsa3 Si, T2S, R1W, W.M. 126.00' I MIN 5/8'•yRPC , 1489'46'22'30 L J 'see/PACIFIC AS 94001 e NSA 31565 254.67 ADJUSTED uNE 4680. 44.ar SEE DETAIL-7 I SEE SHEET 2 FOR THE NARRATIVE, 5831, ADJUSTED LINE SHEET 2 _ ACKAMA-00300 PROCEDURE AND HORIZONTAL _ n CLACKABAN COUNTY CONTROL �•N >r 1 BANK Z g ADJUSTED W�3011 5/11' OU00IC a 25101AB-01400 As SET N SI 30065 o it WAL-MART REAL 31583 M)SNOW w 91 N • LEGEND PALMER "' ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST v -�' ^ - O 9T 5/e'RON ROD r/YELLOW PLASTIC CM' 544,880 SO.FT. _ 3 5,a STUMPED'SHERRY 74504'.FOR PROPOSED Mil BO.IDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APRIL 9.2012 "' 12.51 ACRESt o RI X STAY EO OU(RR74508"SETOCTCSERSC29.� 2000.FOR 94 31563 R q 25101BA-00401 € $ • FOUND.0604.070104 AS NOTED IRI-COIRHTY CENTER I - ____ 'Ll -N TRUST I g () RECORD DFSTANCE PER 504 31583 FOND 5/8'R.N IN 94 - N IROI Ra SET N RAT OF HFAMO50 P 104 PRE PARK,AW 5140491 N 91 i I 31543'9 ORIGINAL LINE 9/ DENOTES'Wm' ••T 246134_1 rW FOND 5/6'R W/RPC - we YELLOW PLASTIC GAP ,1x6.19) 'WMH PAOCC AS 6.9000'00' / 5HD1w N SN 31583 D.L.G. DONATION LAND CLAW R=(75.00') L.(117.81')�I 1 N81'54.22-W.(163.09.)f- _ by SN rA940410N COUNTY 9wNEY NUMBER 09D.BRC.-55305'43'99 L, °Z W J o -- 7 CHD.LEN.-(106.07) I i 10 o f-1 1 =3 I 5 ?`- \'1� OF 5/r R w/YPC 1140 §8 m z z I m g il I 4 1 -N- e. v VA V REGHSTERED TECH'SM PER 563 94 7.1175OUM 124E B 2z I °em u HERU050 PARK I f PROFESSIONAL 1 080 v I BOOK 16.PAGE 48 111 LAN• U- -- __ .1 OF THE 0E0.RICHARDSON D.L.C. 50p 7 N 6 N 3 I i i'�NN7♦ ` -_- (25.80') I I I ) 1 25' �r(/�pr (z4 481'35'37.„ 248154'17'99 2 I .� s FOLIO 5/Y R W/wt ) _ (521.16) (1857) I cOH -IEPETTO-LS 307'AS SET w 90 28,716 ANO SHOW w 91 3158.3 7510080-00100 _ SIY HERMOSO 8'AY /` 100 0 50 100 200 HR OFE R SHERBY PNWP,LLC/7 7S101AB-01500 $ ``� - NM - SJP.LLC 25101AB-01501 __j_____ = M ■ RENEW GI3W12 LIONEL,LLC I INCH=100 FEET 73 21 9 ) 10 TIN I I it r' - -X09'3'Ay ( 1325 SE TECH CENTER DRIVE,SUITE 110 1 12 B4,r `___ M VANCOUVER,W) 95-34 13 -7 VANCOUVER.(360)695-3411 1 4 - 7 D C PORTLAND:)(503)695 289-6726 (�(j jJ FAX(360)695-0833 MOON a 2'BRASS 2190 w wwW.maokaysposito.com Mal 800 STAMPED YI 725 R15 MacKay 8 SpoA8a.Inc. WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE MACKAY a 910910 NC MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO NATTERS OF UNWRITTEN 1RE 5301 AS WASH.CO.SURVEYOR 701.7 36'. ttY/B/Y 8ry Wit ACCEPTED FOR FILING w-Zo-/L LAS ESTOPPEL POSSESSOR.ETC.OR 44500(R PARCELS SH0WH HERE ON ARE LEGAL AS 940491 IN S1 31x3 Gk.By: Drawn By: Joe No.: Cheated By: tts DWG.Nam.: 14!!51452 SHEET 1 OF 2 RECORD OF SURVEY-PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST AND THE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST DETAIL SHEET QUARTER OF SECTION 36,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST OF THE ----- - WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. CITY OF TIGARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON STATE MONUMENTS SET APRA.9.2012 31794 2/2 si, • 'ART 4 NARRATIVE N26'32'33'W OU THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SET MONUMENTS AT INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS FOR 12.13' � • 's. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF TAX LOTS 1S136CD-04200,2S101BA-00101 AND 2S101AB-01400, • 'TT FF APPROVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD.EFFECTIVE AUGUST 16,2011,UNDER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT N68•40'35'W 2011-00003. 4.84' 4-0407•40' R='✓47.00' L=39.41' PERIMETER BOUNDARY WAS PRFVIOUSI Y DETERMINED BY THIS FIRM AND FILED UNDER SURVEY 6.29'24'16' • CAD.T3RG.=571'56'54'E NUMBER 31583.WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDS. R-41.50' L=21.30' 6:11'30'42' CHO.LEN.-39.40' CHD.BRG.-N00'35'58'W R-547.00' 1-109.90' • • DEED REFERENCE Go.LEN.-21.06 CAD.BRO.-564'07'4n • WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST,DOC.NO.2012-024817. 1. CHD.LEN.-109.72' N82'06.537 ADJUSTED e " 89' W 9.80' HORIZONTAL DATUM/CONTROL 1S136CD-04200 . `• SURVEY IS ON OREGON NORTH STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM.ZONE 3601,NAD83(91)BASED ON • TIES TO THE FOLLOWING CONTROL STATIONS 5-57'05'54' a R-42.00' L-41,90' CITY OF TIGARD GIS CONTROL NETWORK STATION CITY Of TIGARD GIS CONTROL NETWORK STATION 0, CH D.BRG-542'3Yp7•Ly GC-022-023;NORTHING: 652196.325',FASTING: GC_022-024; NORTHING: 652125.827'.LASTING: • 'i4' CND,LM4. 40.14 7620932.569'. A 2'BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT 7623574.508'. A 3-5"ALUMINUM DISC SET IN ADJUSTED BOX IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE DOOR OF RUSS CONCRETE 90'SOUTH OF THE CL OF SW _ 6-03'32'09' 2$1018A-00101 CHEVROLET BODY SHOP AT THE CORNER OF SW DARTMOUTH STREET.APPROXIMATELY 700'WEST A-1352'32' • R=142.00' L-876' HALL BOULEVARD AND STATE HIGHWAY 99, OF SW 72ND AVENUE.MARKING THE NORTH R-198.50' L=4807' CAD BRG-SI2'20'OS'W MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 1. QUARTER CORNER Of SECTION 1. CHD.BRG- 111 • CHD.LEN.-8.76' cHD.LEN.-47.95' BASIS OF BEARINGS N N79,„.,... BEARINGS BASED ON OREGON(3601)STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM.NAD83(91) ADJUSTED 197,p3• • 2S101AB-01400 PROCEDURE REAL-TIME KINEMATIC OBSERVATIONS(COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE RB RECEIVERS)AND TRAVERSE/ 'a -g, BOUNDARY MONUMENT DATA(COLLECTED USING A TRIMBLE S6 TOTALSTATION)WERE ADJUSTED USING THE LEAST SQUARES METHOD IN STAR•NET; THE RESULTING RELATIVE ACCURACY IS IN '� w CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRINCIPALS STATED IN O.R.S.92.05.MONUMENTS WERE SET FROM $ `" CONTROL AS ESTABLISHED ABOVE USING REAL-TIME KINEMATIC OBSERVATIONS. COORDINATES COMPUTED IN THE LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT MERE BASED ON THE OREGON NORTH DETAIL: ACCESS AREA ABUTTING SW DARTMOUTH STREET STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM(ZONE 3601).DERIVED FROM OBSERVATIONS TO CITY OF TIGARD SCALE F-30' GIS CONTROL NETWORK STATIONS AS SHOWN HEREON(SEE'HORIZONTAL DATUM/CONTROL'). A ---'—'--------- PROJECT COMBINED FACTOR WAS COMPUTED TO BE 0.999 89 8085 7. ' 0:II. .M ,, ..I I . 1 . . ...N THE INVERSE OF THE PROJECT COMBINED FACTOR ti In o ADJUSTED 6-0851'30' N89'46'22'W RECSreREO 251018A-00101 R=20850' 1-32.24' O o 7 NOOl3'38•E CND.BRC.4522'39'47'W 49'98' PROFESS 1,44 L �7 N89'48'22'W /9.00' C1b.LEN.-12.20' --�� -N- O 63.00' `a(/ N89'46'22 W '`,/ 126.00• N89'16'22'W GoM ADJUSTED N0013'38•E 51'77 TOFERC MMY 2S101 AB-01400 2.00' RENEW 6130112 DETAIL: SOUTH LINE ADJUSTED 251014A-00101 SCALE: I'-30' 1325 SE TECH CENTER DRIVE,SUITE 140 LEGEND I8% VANCOUVER,WA 98683 Lli VANCOUVER:(360)695-3411 PORTLAND:(503)289-6726 0 sr 3/e'SON R00•/1EU0•PLASTIC CAP FAX(360)695-0833 STAMPED'HERBY 7A50e.FOR PROPOSED www.madcaysposlto.com NOOROWIY LSE AD.IISTMEMT AMT.9,2010 MacKay 8 Smoak,.Inc. MACON•9NI910 MC.MAKES NO WIRRAWIES AS TO MATTERS Of UNWRITTEN 11111 SUCH AS X FOUND 5/V WON ROD 91/TELL05 MASTIC CAP Cole.By- CL"Sn• Drawn By ea Job No.: IKJ]➢ ACQIESCENCE,ESTOPPEL.AOMERSE POSSESSION.ETC.OR METIER PARCE1S 50091 HERE ON ARE LEGAL 5015 FO'9NA1Y 71509'.Q1 OCTOBER 29, 1011 F011 70wMG PURPOSES.ETC. 2010.FOR 9M]15e5 Checked By- Ea DWG.Name._'4-U9"57 SHEET 2 OF 2 I Tigard Retail Center — Outdoor Recycling Storage Area Land Use Permit Application for Planned Development MODIFICATION Tigard, OR November 14, 2013 Updated December 11, 2013 RECEIVED DEC 11 2013 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING Turning Visions into Reality Tigard Retail Center — Outdoor Recycling Storage Area Tigard, Oregon Land Use Permit Application for Planned Development Modification Table of Contents • Land Use Permit Application Form • Written Summary of Proposal/Narrative • Response to Development Standards • Pre-Application Conference Notes • Service Provider Letter • Proposed Site Plan • Proposed Storage Area Plan • Arborist Statement of Verification and Tree Canopy Plan Land Use Permit Application Form s • City of Tigard Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY: TIGARD File# Other Case# Date By Receipt# Fee Date Complete J TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(H) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(II) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) i v Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Downtown Design Review(H,III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or III) NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCATION\CTIERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address of vulabk) 7600 SW Dartmouth Street TAX MAPS d:TAX LOT NOS. 151S136CD-04200, 2S101BA-00101, 2S11AB-01400 TOI AI.SI I E SI'Zh ZONING(:I.AWIICA I ION 18.16 ACRES C-G, MUE APPLICANT" PACLAND (Owner's Agent) MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STAFF./ZIP 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 PHONE NO FAX NO 503-659-9500 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO Shawn Nguy E-MAIL snguy @pacland.com IBOI'I.R'IY OWNER/DI.I.I)11(11.1)1.5(Attach 6,d more than nne) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 2001 SE 10th Street, Mail Stop 5570, Bentonville, AR 72716-5570 PHONE NO FAX NO 479-273-4000 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL.SUMMARY(Please be specific) See project narrative. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signat re Date 3//3 Applica / r t/R•,resentative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 Narrative PROJECT NARRATIVE TIGARD RETAIL CENTER — Outdoor Recycling Storage Area TIGARD, OR DETAILED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW- MINOR MODIFICATIONS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, AND THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON TAX LOTS: 1 S136CD-04200, 2S101 BA-00101, 2S101AB-01400 Order No. 2009-02 PC (PDR 2008-00001) AND 2010-01 PC (PDR 2010-00001) Development Description: This application requests Planned Development Review approval for minor modifications to the approved Tigard Retail Center planned development associated with Order No. 2009-02 PC (PDR 2008-00001) AND 2010-01 PC (PDR2010-0001). The proposed modifications would add a 12' x 113' outdoor recycling storage area with a 10' CMU screen wall to support the operations of the Walmart store currently under construction. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by either outbound empty trucks or routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. Based on coordination with City Staff, the proposed minor modification will require a Type III-PC review process to ensure that the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is consistent with the standards of the development code. A Type III-PC review process entails a public hearing before the Planning Commission to approve the modifications of the original development plan. Project Location: The project site is located within the Tigard Triangle, south of SW Dartmouth Street, approximately 400 feet west of SW 72"d Avenue in the NE and NW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, and the SE and SW 1/4 of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, within the limits of Tigard, Oregon. This site is comprised of three separate tax lots: TL 04200 of Map 1 S136CD, TL 00101 of Map 2S101 BA, and TL 01400 of Map 2S101 AB. Tigard Retail Center Outdoor Recycling Storage Area— Narrative Page 1 of 4 December 2013 Prior Land Use Action: The Tigard Retail Center originally received Planned Development Review approval for Planned Development concept and detailed development plan for development of an 18.16- acre property with a proposed 137,900 square foot Target retail building and two additional 12,000 square foot retail buildings. The original approval decision for the Tigard Retail Center became effective on June 17, 2009 and was associated with PC Order No. 2009-02 (PDR2008-0001). In 2010, through PC Order No. 2010-01, the Planning Commission approved modifications of the building elevations to accommodate a non-specific user and remove the Target-specific color, materials, and logos since Target decided not to locate to the subject site. Approvals Requested: The applicant seeks approval to make minor site plan modifications to an approved Planned Development Detailed Plan Review approval to accommodate a 12'x 113'outdoor recycling storage area with 10' CMU screen walls in an effort to promote sustainability and achieve zero waste in the operations of the Walmart store Proposed Site Areas: The Tigard Retail Center was originally approved in 2009 for a Target anchored development, which included approximately 529,690 sf of impervious area. The modified development plan approved in 2010 to remove the Target specific elevations, kept the impervious area of the site unchanged. Walmart submitted for building permits utilizing the approved 2010 site plan and elevations. During the permitting process for the Walmart project, curb lines and pavement areas were refined slightly to reduce pavement, grading, and retaining wall costs. These minor revisions included reducing drive aisles from 30' to 28' in certain areas, as well as removing the pavement "bump-out" that was originally proposed at the back of the Target store. These changes reduced the impervious area by approximately 2,659 sf. In addition, consistent with Walmart's sustainability initiatives, a porous pavement pathway was utilized for the pedestrian path in the "Open Space" area along the wetland buffer areas of the site, resulting in a further reduction of impervious area by approximately 3,100 sf. Therefore, the total amount of impervious area was reduced by approximately 5,759 sf when compared to the originally approved development plan. The proposed area of the outdoor recycling storage area is approximately 1,356 sf. Even with the addition of the outdoor recycling storage area, the amount of impervious area has been reduced from the originally approved development plan by approximately 4,403 sf, resulting in a corresponding increase in the amount of "pervious" area on the site, as demonstrated below: Tigard Retail Center Outdoor Recycling Storage Area-Narrative Page 2 of 4 December 2013 Site Item Currently Currently Proposed Proposed Approved Approved Revision Revision Retail 1 Building Area 12,000 SF 1.5% - - Retail 2 Building Area 12,000 SF 1.5% - - Retail 3 Building Area 137,900 SF 17.4% - - Total Building Area 161,900 SF 20.5% - - Parking/Drive Aisles/Loading Areas 327,715 SF 41.4% 325,056 SF 41.1 Outdoor Recycling/Storage Area 1,356 SF 0.2% Pedestrian Areas/Plazas/Hardscape 40,075 SF 5.1% 36,975 SF 4.7% TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 529,690 SF 67.0% 525,287 SF 66.4% Wetland Area 65,629 SF 8.3% - - Vegetated Corridor Area (including 125,198 SF 15.8% 127,998 SF 16.2% mitigation area and porous pavement (CWS Permit) within buffer area) Porous Pavement Pathway outside 3,100 SF 0.4% Vegetated Buffer Area Landscape Area outside 70,533 SF 8.9% 69,036 SF 8.7% WetlandNegetated Corridor TOTAL ON-SITE PERVIOUS AREA 261,360 SF 33.0% 265,763 SF 33.6% Total Site Plan Area 791,050 SF 100.0% 791,050 SF 100.0% (18.16 acres): Site Access/Circulation: No changes to the approved site access and circulation plan are proposed with this application. Parking: No changes to the approved parking plan are proposed with this application. Transportation: No changes to the approved traffic impact mitigation measures are proposed with this application. No additional trips to the site will result as a result of the proposed outdoor recycling storage area. The materials in the outdoor recycling storage area will be loaded on empty Walmart trucks and returned to the distribution center for recycling and re-use. Utility Infrastructure: No changes to the approved utility infrastructure system are proposed with this application. Tigard Retail Center Outdoor Recycling Storage Area— Narrative Page 3 of 4 December 2013 Stormwater Management: No changes to the approved storm water management system are proposed with this application. No additional impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project since the overall impervious area of the site decreased from what was previously approved with the Target project. The proposed storage area is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. The drainage report, dated August 2008, submitted with the Target application provided a summary of the pond stage for various storm events as shown below: Storm Event Detention Pond Stag_ e (ft) • 2-year 173.27 10-year 174.33 25-year 174.63 100-yr 175.02 As shown on the Bale and Pallet plan sheet BP-1 included with this application, the storage area and associated retaining wall are located at elevation 176.5 and above, which is approximately 1.5ft above the 100-year event pond stage level. As a result, the storage area will not impact the function of the pond. Erosion Control: No changes to the approved erosion control approach are proposed with this application. WetlandsNegetated Corridors: No changes to the approved wetlands/vegetated corridor management approach are proposed with this application. Pallet Storage Clearance Requirements: As noted above, the proposed storage area will included the storage of wood pallets. It is anticipated that a maximum of 150 wood pallets will be stored within this area at any given time. TVFR has indicated that a required minimum clearance of 30ft must be maintained between the storage area and the exterior door on the south wall of the building in order to comply with Chapter 34 of the NFP1 Fire Code. As shown on the site plan, the proposed storage area is located a minimum of 30ft away from this exterior door. Tigard Retail Center Outdoor Recycling Storage Area-Narrative Page 4 of 4 December 2013 Response to Development Standards Tigard Retail Center - Code Response Detailed Development Plan Modification NOTE: The project proposes minor modifications to the approved site plan for the Tigard Retail Center to accommodate an outdoor recycling storage area to promote sustainability and zero-waste initiatives. Unless otherwise noted in the code sections below, the project is consistent with the approved 2010 Tigard Retail Center application (PC Order No. 2010- 01 PDR2010-0001). Based on coordination with City Planning Staff, this code response only addresses the code sections that are applicable to the proposed modification. Table of Contents Chapter Title Page 18.350 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 8 18.620 TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 8 18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE 8 18.790 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN REQUIREMENTS 12 18.350 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 18.350.020 Process B. Elements of approval process. There are three elements to the planned development approval process, as follows: 1. The approval of the planned development concept plan. 2. The approval of the detailed development plan;and 3. The approval of the planned development overlay zone. Response: The subject property previously received planned development approval for concurrent review of a planned development concept and detailed plan (PC Order No. 2009-02, PDR 2008-00001 and PC Order no. 2010-01, PDR 2010-00001). The current proposal is for modification of the existing detailed development plan approval to make minor revisions to the approved site plan to accommodate an outdoor recycling storage area. 18.350.040 Concept Plan Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The applicant shall submit an application containing all of the general information required for a Type III-PC procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050 and the additional information required by 18.350.040.B. In addition, the applicant shall submit the following: 1. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the planned development through the particular approach proposed by the applicant. This statement should include: a. A description of the character of the proposed development and the rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant. Response: No changes to the overall approved character of the development are proposed with this application. Changes from the previous application are limited to the addition of an outdoor recycling storage area behind Retail 3 (Walmart). This area will help support the efficient operations of the store and the promotion of sustainable and zero waste initiatives. b. An explanation of the architectural style, and what innovative site planning principals are utilized including any innovations in building techniques that will be employed. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 1 of 13 December 2013 Response: No modifications to the approved design concept or architectural style are proposed with this application. It was noted in the previous concept plan submittal that °consistent with the spirit of sustainable development, potential Retail 3 users will be worked with to promote and encourage sustainable features in the construction and operation of the Retail 3 building". The addition of an outdoor recycling storage area is consistent with this direction. c. An explanation of how the proposal relates to the purposes of the Planned Development Chapter as expressed in 18.350.010. 2. To provide such added benefits as increased natural areas or open space in the City, alternative building designs, walkable communities, preservation of significant natural resources, aesthetic appeal, and other types of assets that contribute to the larger community in lieu of strict adherence to many of the rules of the Tigard Community Development Code; and Response: The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan. The proposed modifications will not impact the previously planned and approved natural areas and open space available for public use. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is an asset to the larger community in that it promotes the re-use and recycling of wood pallets, cardboard bales, plastic crates, etc., in an effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero-waste in the operations of the Walmart store. d. An explanation of how the proposal utilized the Planning Commission's Toolbox. Response: No changes are proposed to the utilization of the Planning Commission's Toolbox. This application seeks a modification to the previously approved Detailed Development Plan to accommodate an outdoor recycling storage area. No variations to the other development standards are requested. 2. A general development schedule indicating the approximate dates when construction of the planned development and its various phases are expected to be initiated and completed. Response: Based on prior planned development approvals, the Tigard Retail Center is currently under construction. It is anticipated that the outdoor recycling storage area would be constructed upon receipt of all approvals from the City, with completion expected prior to the grand opening of the retail center anticipated to occur in the summer of 2014. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 2 of 13 December 2013 3. A statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to the future selling or leasing of all or portions of the planned development. In the case where a residential subdivision is proposed, the statement shall include the applicant's intentions whether the applicant will build the homes, or sell the lots to other builders. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area supports the operations of the Walmart store and will not be sold or leased to other users. B. Additional information. In addition to the general information described in Subsection A above, the concept plan, data, and narrative shall include the following information, the detailed content of which can be obtained from the Director: 1. Existing site conditions; 2. A site concept including the types of proposed land uses and structures, including housing types, and their general arrangement on the site; 3. A grading concept; 4. A landscape concept indicating a percentage range for the amount of proposed open space and landscaping, and general location and types of proposed open space(s); 5. An urban forestry plan consistent with Chapter 18.790; 6. Parking concept; 7. A sign concept; and 8. A streets and utility concept; and 9. Structure Setback and Development Standards concept, including the proposed residential density target if applicable. Response: The required plans noted above were included with the approved 2008 application. Refer to plan set for application case file PDR 2008-0001. As a condition of approval for the prior application, the original site plan was revised to include larger interior landscape islands within the parking field. A final landscape plan depicting the approved layout was included with the conditions of approval for the original application. The only proposed modification to the original site plan is the addition of a screened outdoor recycling storage area located behind Retail 3 (Walmart). This modification does not affect the proposed land uses and has no impact on the open space areas. There are no significant changes to the grading concept, and there is no reduction to landscape areas as identified in the Project Narrative included with this application. This modification is shown on the current site concept plan (sheet PC-1.0) included with this application. An exhibit is included with this application demonstrating compliance with Chapter 18.790, urban forestry for the 33% canopy coverage for the site. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 3 of 13 December 2013 No changes are proposed to the parking lot configuration, signage, or street and utility plans with this application. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located outside of any required setbacks, varying between approximately 35 - 125ft from the nearest street right of way and property lines. C. Allowable Uses. 2. In commercial zones. In all commercial zones, an applicant with a planned development approval may develop the site to contain all of the uses permitted outright in the underlying zone and, in addition, a maximum of 25% of the total gross floor area may be used for multifamily dwellings in those commercial zones that do not list multifamily dwellings as an outright use. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is an accessory use to the Walmart store and is permitted outright in the C-C zone. 18.350.50 Concept Plan Approval Criteria A. The concept plan may be approved by the Commission only if all of the following criteria are met: 1. The concept plan includes specific designations on the concept map for areas of open space, and describes their intended level of use, how they relate to other proposed uses on the site, and how they protect natural features of the site. Response: This application does not propose any changes for areas of open space. This criterion does not apply. 2. The concept plan identifies areas of significant natural resources, if any, and identifies methods for their maximized protection, preservation, and/or management. Response: This application does not propose any changes to areas of natural resources. This criterion does not apply. 3. The concept plan identifies how the future development will integrate into the existing neighborhood, either through compatible street layout, architectural style, housing type, or by providing a transition between the existing neighborhood and the project with compatible development or open space buffers. Response: This application does not propose any changes for integration into the existing neighborhood. This criterion does not apply. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 4 of 13 December 2013 4. The concept plan identifies methods for promoting walkability or transit ridership, such methods may include separated parking bays, off street walking paths, shorter pedestrian routes than vehicular routes, linkages to or other provisions for bus stops, etc. Response: This application does not propose any changes for walkability or transit ridership. This criterion does not apply. 5. The concept plan identifies the proposed uses, and their general arrangement on site. In the case of projects that include a residential component, housing type, unit density, or generalized lot sizes shall be shown in relation to their proposed location on site. Response: This application does not propose any changes to the proposed uses, nor the general arrangement of the buildings. This criterion does not apply. 6. The concept plan must demonstrate that development of the property pursuant to the plan results in development that has significant advantages over a standard development. A concept plan has a significant advantage if it provides development consistent with the general purpose of the zone in which it is located at overall densities consistent with the zone, while protecting natural features or providing additional amenities or features not otherwise available that enhance the development project or the neighborhood. (Ord. 12-09 1; 06-16) Response: This application does not propose any significant changes to the approved site plan. The only change is the addition of a screened recycling storage area behind the anchor store, which is consistent with the allowed uses in the zone and does not have any impact on natural features or other amenities included with the approved plan. 18.350.060 Detailed Development Plan Submission Requirements B. Additional information. In addition to the general information described in Subsection A above, the detailed development plan, data, and narrative shall include the following information: 1. Contour intervals of one foot, unless otherwise approved by the director, and spot elevations at breaks in grade, along drainage channels or swales, and at selected points, as needed. Response: The grading and drainage plans will be consistent with the previously approved application. A short retaining wall (maximum 4'height) is proposed at the back of the recycling storage area due to the change in grade at this location. See the attached site plan. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 5 of 13 December 2013 2. A specific development schedule indicating the approximate dates of construction activity, including demolition, tree protection installation, tree removal, ground breaking, grading, public improvements, building construction, and landscaping for each phase. Response: Construction of the proposed screened outdoor recycling storage area is anticipated to begin immediately after all city approvals have been obtained, prior to completion of the current construction activity. 3. A copy of all existing and/or proposed restrictions or covenants. Response: No changes are proposed. C. Compliance with specific development standards. The Detailed Development Plan shall show compliance with base zone provisions, with the following modifications: 1. Lot dimensional standards. 2. Site coverage. 3. Building height. 4. Structure setback provisions: Response: The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved concept and detailed site plan, and continues to meet standards of the base zone provisions as described in this code response. No modifications to the code standards are requested. 18.350.070 Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria A. Detailed Development Plan Approval Criteria. A detailed development plan may be approved only if all the following criteria are met: 1. The detailed plan is generally consistent with the concept plan. Minor changes from the concept plan do not make the detailed plan inconsistent with the concept plan unless: a. The change increases the residential densities, increases the lot coverage by buildings or reduces the amount of parking; b. The change reduces the amount of open space and landscaping; c. The change involves a change in use; d. The change commits land to development which is environmentally sensitive or subject to a potential hazard; and e. The change involves a major shift in the location of buildings, proposed streets, parking lots, landscaping or other site improvements. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 6 of 13 December 2013 Response: The proposed site plan modification is for the inclusion of a screened outdoor recycling storage area behind Retail 3 (Walmart) and is consistent with the approved concept and detailed plan. No significant changes are proposed to the approved site plan. This criterion is met. 4. In addition, the following criteria shall be met: b. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: i. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses; e.g., between single-family and multifamily residential, and residential and commercial uses; Response: The only adjacent property with a different type of land use is located to the southeast corner of the development, which is zoned MUE. According to the Buffer Matrix, Table 18.745.1 & 2, a 10 foot buffer is required. The approved site plan includes a minimum 20'buffer between the nearest hard surface improvements (a pathway) and the adjacent property. No changes are proposed to the previously approved buffer in this area. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area behind the anchor store will be approximately 120'away from the MUE zoned property at the closest point, separated by a significant amount of trees and landscaping beyond the initial buffer area. The outdoor recycling storage area itself will also include a 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall. iii. On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such activities as service areas, storage areas, parking lots and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (A) What needs to be screened; (B) The direction from which it is needed; and (C) Whether the screening needs to be year-round. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located approximately 100'from the adjacent property to the south, and approximately 120' from adjacent property to the southeast. In addition to the 10-ft high painted split face CMU screen wall, significant landscaping will be planted in the area between the property line and the outdoor recycling storage area. The landscape trees in these areas will include evergreen trees that will provide additional screening year-round. The combination of the 10-ft high CMU screen wall, the landscaping with evergreen trees, as well as the distance of the outdoor recycling storage area from the property line, will provide adequate screening from the adjacent properties. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 7 of 13 December 2013 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS The site is zoned C-G and MUE. The proposed outdoor storage area is permitted outright as accessory to the approved retail center. The revised site plan is substantially similar to the approved site plan. The proposed modifications are still consistent with the requirements of this section. 18.620 TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 18.620.040 Building Design Standards A. Non-residential buildings. All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 4. Building materials. Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. Response: The material proposed for the 10'screen wall around the outdoor recycling storage area will be a painted, split faced CMU block. Foundation materials below or within two feet of finish grade may be plain concrete or concrete block as allowed by this section. This criterion is met. 18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE 18.755.030 Materials Accepted A. Materials accepted. Except as provided for in 18.755.040 G and I, the storage area must be able to accept at least all "principle recyclable materials" designated by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission and other source-separated recyclable the local government identifies by regulation. Response: The approved development includes storage areas that are able to accept all "principal recyclable materials" for the operation of the approved Tigard Retail Center. The proposed outdoor recycling storage allows for additional management of materials to be recycled and/or re-used by Walmart. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 8 of 13 December 2013 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. Response: No changes are proposed to the approved trash enclosure locations with this application. This application proposes an additional outdoor recycling storage area behind the Walmart anchor store. As noted in the approved 2008 application, the minimum standards method was used to adequately size the trash enclosures for the proposed retail pads for this site. The trash compactor for the anchor store building is based on typical building requirements of the anchor retailer. The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on Walmart's typical requirements for being able to store materials that can be recycled and re-used. Walmart has an aggressive sustainability program which includes, among other things, the recycling and re-use of such things as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items are typically stored until such time that Walmart's delivery trucks return to the distribution center, at which time the stored items are loaded in the empty truck trailer and returned for re-use and/or recycling. Accordingly, the proposed outdoor recycling storage area is not serviced by the typical franchised hauler and is only for Walmart's use. This storage area has been coordinated with the franchise hauler, Pride Disposal, who has indicated they have no objection to the outdoor recycling storage area. C. Minimum standards method. 4. General requirements: a. The storage area requirement is based on the predominant use(s) of the building, (i.e. residential, office, retail, wholesale/warehouse/ manufacturing, educational/institutional, or other). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies 20 percent or less of the floor area of the building, the floor area occupied by that use shall be counted toward the floor area of the predominant use(s). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies more than 20% of the floor area of the Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 9 of 13 December 2013 building, then the storage area requirement for the whole building shall be the sum of the requirement for the area of each use. b. Storage areas for multiple uses on a single site may be combined and shared. c. The specific requirements are based on an assumed storage height of 4 feet for solid waste/recyclable. Vertical storage higher than 4 feet but no higher than 7 feet may be used to accommodate the same volume of storage in a reduced floor space (potential reduction of 43% of specific requirements). Where vertical or stacked storage is proposed, the site plan shall include drawings to illustrate the layout of the storage area and dimensions of containers. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on the requirements of the typical operations and needs for the Walmart building. 5. Specific requirements: a. Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional 5 square feet per unit for each unit above 10. b. Non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus: (1) Office: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). (2) Retail: 10 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (3) Industrial: 6 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (4) Institutional: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. (5) Other: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is based on the requirements of the typical operations and needs for the Walmart building. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance, described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 10 of 13 December 2013 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area is located behind the Walmart building, in the vicinity of the primary service area adjacent to the loading docks and trash compactor area. The proposed location is consistent with the applicable location standards. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Response: The proposed outdoor recycling storage area dimensions are based on the requirements of the typical operations and needs for the Walmart building. The storage area will meet the Uniform Fire Code and be screened by a 10-ft high split face CMU wall. In addition, the area will be labeled to indicate the type of material accepted, consistent with the design standards. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 11 of 13 December 2013 D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Response: The new outdoor recycling storage area is located behind the Walmart building in the vicinity of the loading docks in an area convenient to store employees and service personnel. Access to the area will be obtained by the access drive aisle around the building and will not require backing out onto public streets. Adequate turning radii are provided to allow collection vehicle to safely access and exit the site in a forward motion. The recycling storage area is consistent with the access standards. Chapter 18.790 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and Response: The proposed modification to the site plan to include an outdoor recycling storage area is minor and is substantially similar to the approved site plan. The project will not increase the previously approved site impervious area and thereby will not impact the open soil volume available to implement the approved landscaping plan. The 33% canopy coverage requirement for the entire site is met with the minor modification for the outdoor recycling storage area. As shown on the table below and consistent with the methods for calculating effective canopy area outlined in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Plan, the landscaping plan previously approved for the Target store and as coordinated with city staff during the site permitting review process will continue to provide in excess of 33% canopy coverage for the site as demonstrated below: Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 12 of 13 December 2013 Table 1 Tree Count based on currently approved landscaping plan: Quantity Mature Native Non-Native No. Tree Species Canopy(sf Canopy Canopy (ea) per tree)' Area (sf) Area (sf) 1 Vine Maple(Native) 31 314 9734 2 Crimson Sentry 30 177 5310 3 Red Sunset Maple 28 962 26936 4 Red Alders (Native) 22 1256 27632 5 Heritage River Birch 16 962 15392 6 Deodar Cedar 22 707 15554 7 Green Arrow 13 50 650 Cypress 8 Dwayck Purple 3 113 339 Beech 9 Autumn Purple Ash 13 1256 16328 10 Kwasan Cherry 7 314 2198 11 Oregon White Oaks 8 1963 15704 (Native) 12 Western Red Cedar 9 707 6363 (Native) 13 Hogan Cedar 40 314 12,560 (Native) 14 Douglas Fir (Native) 3 1256 3768 Total Canopy Area (st) 75,761 82,707 ' Tree canopy area as provided by the Urban Forest Manual and the attached Arborist Statement of Verification. Trees count included on this list are those that meet the city's minimum size, height, and soil volume requirements at time of planting. Table 2 Effective % Canopy 2x Canopy 1.25x Mature lx Mature Total Site Area of Canopy Area Canopy Canopy Effective Area (sf)of % (sf) preserved (sf)of Native Area (sf) stands" Planted Trees" Non-Native for Site Canopy Trees 791,050 2 x 63,915 1.25 x 75,761 82,707 305,238 38.6% ' Preserved trees canopy area calculated based on the tree root protection zone delineated as part of the approved tree preservation plan for the site and on existing tree stands canopy around the site. Refer to the attached Arborist Statement of Verification and TC- 1.0 included with this application. 2. Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Plan allows 2x canopy for preserved stands, 1.25x for native canopy The effective canopy area only takes into account trees that, at the time of planting, will meet the city's minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirement. It does not include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees that will be planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. If these trees were to be counted, the effective canopy would be much higher. Tigard Retail Center-Code Response Page 13 of 13 December 2013 Pre-Application Conference Notes CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ' (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(6) Months) TIGARD ,. PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: §entember26.2013 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: John Floyd.Mike McCarthy, TVF&R NON-RESIDENTIAL ad APPLICANT: PACLAND AGENT: Shawn Nguy Phone: Phone: (503) 659-9500 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 7600 SW Dartmouth Street (Walmart Real Estate Trus() TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S101AB00101 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Detailed Development Plan PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: New detailed development plan approval in order to modify the previously ,approved detailed development plan to include a 12' x 113' recycling enclosure behind a 10'high CMIJ wall, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Commercial General ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C-G (PD) ❑ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section I Z NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.610(Tigard Downtown Design ® 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Standards) Storage) ❑ 8.340(Director's Interpretation) ® 18.620(rig,trd Triangle Design ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) Standards) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional ® 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Center) Requirements) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) Standards) ❑ 18.370(variances/Adjustments) ®I 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) El 18.780(Signs) El18.380(Zoning Map/'text Amendmen Li ts) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Pemnitti) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) Z 18.390(Decision Making ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standanis) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) • Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.410(Lot line Adjustments) ® 18.725(Environmental Pcrfonawice ❑ 18.798 (Wireless Communication Standards) Facilities) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development ® 18.810 (Street & Uti ity Improvement Standards) Standards) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ▪ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Dtctricts) /:I 18.745(Landscaping&Screening y Standards) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ® IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:..J_ Minimum access width: 30 feet Minimum pavement width: 24 feet All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. El WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS,ramps, or elevators of all commercial,institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Applirau nt/t'Ianning Division Section El SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ PLEASE REFER TO NOTES FROM DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745&18.610) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND'10 EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E(1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition,screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745, 18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE I , DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site(m feet) by 40 feet(if the number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE H & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT(TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(TYPE II)All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles,shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a dear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ❑ PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Sales Oriented Retail in MU-CBD=30.0/1,000 x 0.75 = 2.25 / 1,000 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 44 spaces provided/34 required NO MORE TI IAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as set forth in Figure 18.765.1,with the following minimums: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section irFh ► Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. l-IANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of usc: 5 spaces. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and the boundaries.is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application, Cha ter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RSIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PRO!IIRITED WITHIN FIX)ODPLAINS, ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Re,icknttel Application/Planning Division Section El CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&o 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION &ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: _, 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre 25 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet I 10 to<50 acres 50 feet >50 to<100 acres • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravines ;Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. ('The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as prosided for in the GWS Design and Construction Standards Location of Vegetates Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL,of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. • Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the"Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use(Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development(Type III);Sensitive Lands Review(Type II and III);Site Development Review(Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required:% (l�er to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Fortuity Manual,*a fir/of trees with mature canopy cover arras) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval,or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. ❑ PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area.Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ❑ CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad,and road/road intersections. The size of the required dear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the dear vision area. El ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section El ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Please note that development code amendment shave occurred since the last Planning Commission approval in 2010. As such your narrative will have to address the new standards including,but not necessarily limited to, new urban forestry standards embedded in multiple chapters of the code and the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81" x 11", One.8W' x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardCity Council A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to appl those system development credits to the first build' omit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER—At TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NUN-Residential Ap,lication/Plannmq Division Section PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: John Floyd.Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-718-2429 EMAIL: johnfl @tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON Residential Ariplication/Planning Division Section I Service Provider Letter i Clean Water Services File Number i .1 . L1 2.0X013 �� CeanWater\` Services Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Tigard 1. Jurisdiction: i 2. Property Information (example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): 2S101Af3-TL101 Name: Company:Walmart Real Estate Business Trust Address:2001 SE 10th St, MS 5570 Site Address: 7600 SW DARTMOUTH STREET City,State,Zip: Bentoville,AR 72716 City, State,Zip:TIGARD, OR Phone/Fax:479-273-4000 Nearest Cross Street:72nd Avenue E-Mail: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: PACLAND-do Shawn Nguy ❑ Lot Line Adjustment Li Minor Land Partition Company:PACLAND ❑ Residential Condominium Li Commercial Condominium Address: 6400 SE Lake Road, suite 300 ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision Portland, OR 97222 City, State.Zip: ❑ Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial 503-659-9500 Other Outdoor Storage area Phone/Fax: E-Mail:snguy @pacland.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? U Yes No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project SEE ATTACHED PROJECT NARRATIVE This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands andlor Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/Type Name Shawn Nguy i7 Print/Type Title Project Manager Signature i 4/ /it/ Date Sep 20,2013 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY/ Li Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. IJ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially ' sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. Thls Service Provider Letter is not valid unless 1 CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. Li The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 919195 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by �`_ Date 01/Z`51/ s - 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone:(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503)681-4439 • wow.cleanwaterservices.org 1 1 ' 1 , I i 1 1 1 , , 1 .1 1 ,. 1 ,. ) \ 4,,\*:‘, ,\\ na11VZi'a`wAam, • ' � 90N PAR brl fiTA. •` !fir ° � ``` i ,1 ,�" - , c _ ,a4 . _ ,. a,, Iii A4 4,11 Ae .'!��� ate /A } ::::•"""17'71‘ .5h�' _ o E ;za: � 4 ATE DATA,.. ! I: 4` it-/. f 4 AClA18/RFA 6'6111 'mil SSt 4}• M= EIM e11RFR Mk I1F.A II1I18 Si 11 _ 'KIM bM IR la P MA 1 _' BI►Av;1^ -Q3i •,'=€• J. (ext rAS IMHxAr uD rFe.PAM Sew g eve _ r _ Mt!::S.n Ree t IC'uut5(uccv u)PFIFrel VIe6An6a ma ray FCt 1 rt t ? 1-04: LEGEND • rRMlxU el FU:6 r! I t�j j a.. 1 <Ir�ux ca c MICR tj '' I j'j �'- 1 NMMx S•'XW.W(PA.u•BR PEaFIsS S l;' /A 1 j r .r,Y�, .—I W1,FrzeDARY rp2 C.14 t lb.i NtE.Jrn-ft. ..J ., ( Fr UM,.!a Lnon-RIO l l •!� / i!: 4 :I 1t7AV eE1FR it �� �v , � ii' 1xitA'D 2ARR E1AROa]I,flll 1pfME.SOFa SP 1- f}7TiRe tiw•f•1T jb !] 'WWI,BAER C1odemeaI IFFUE @l 1 >F 1� ! I .L 3 '"'^`"'s•,�T' :- �p Proposed area ® POROUS vAlsFtHt �-' • % ''V° _ (epprollimate IkYror.Aim cuu+e "•'�- .- — 12x113')W Pavement ~ -�r ,1 .;- tNdenin la altdoa X 5I(FY fiiA'Akf OI16ALL YOIX MOULT/WAWA ■ X11 woTFax�_ _ ..,, w=.:_...ruxww.owaa. "I"*_�'v11 Trr�,,. —_ —_-_-- _ e... • .•• ,.e I..,.. :, �AR,DRE1YEiL.A1�AIff1OA710N FJO•B(! • f!• r w � r� Q. vz , Ss Reproved rvi mean !Hater Sevt . es COY Ye v tt y 6 .�- r date z 970 5191,-- /rtticAnwe.et.4 I „E f 1 i Proposed Storage Area Plan Arborist Statement & Tree Canopy Plan ireaoo®CC(oIvEL nano . . a LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8. IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CONSULTING December 10, 2013 Statement of verification I've been asked to verify the diameter numbers shown in the table below for trees proposed. I've cross referenced with local nurseries, and regional manuals. Any inconsistency is marginal and conditional to the growing conditions. No. Tree Species Mature Spread diameter(ft) Mature Canopy(sf per tree) 1 Vine Maple(Native) 20 314 2 Crimson Sentry 15 177 3 , Red Sunset Maple 35 962 4 . Red Alders (Native) 40 1256 5 Heritage River Birch 35 962 6 Deodar Cedar 30 707 7 Green Arrow Cypress 8 50 8 Dwayck Purple Beech 12 113 9 , Autumn Purple Ash 40 1256 10 Kwasan Cherry 20 314 11 . Oregon White Oaks (Native) 50 1963 12 . Western Red Cedar(Native) 30 707 13 , Hogan Cedar(Native) 20 314 14 Douglas Fir(Native) 40 1256 In addition, I have reviewed the existing tree canopy area provided in the attached exhibit TC- 1 .0 and concur that the area shown for existing tree canopy is consistent with site conditions. 1[1 11111111, AIIHL*ISI L ISA _ R. Davies,CA#PN-6149A Z.:7e—,____-. PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD IN 41 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: September 26,2013 _ STAFF AT PRE-APP. John Floyd,Mike McCarthy, TVF&R NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: PACLAND AGENT: Shawn Nguy Phone: Phone: (503) 659-9500 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 7600_SW Dartmouth Street (Walmart Real Estate Trust) TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S101AB00101 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Detailed Development Plan PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: New detailed development plan approval in order to modify the previousl e approved detailed development plan to include a 12' x 113' recycling enclosure behind a 10'high CMU wall. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Commercial General ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C-G (PD) ❑ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.610(Tigard Downtown Design ® 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Standards) Storage) • 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ® 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design El 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) Standards) ® 18.350(Planned Development) n 18.630(Washington Square Regional ® 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Center) Requirements) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) Li 18.640(Durham Quarry Design ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) Standards) 1 ] 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) El 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) n 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) ® 18.390(Decision Making 1 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.725(Environmental Performance ❑ 18.798 (Wireless Communication Standards) Facilities) 18.420(Land Partitions) _ 18.730(Exceptions To Development ® 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) Standards) 18.430(subdivisions) n 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ® 18.520(commercial Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ® IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:. 1 Minimum access width: 30 feet Minimum pavement width: 24 feet All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section E SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ PLEASE REFER TO NOTES FROM DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES:, feet,along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (l SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745&18.610) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR FT JMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition,screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles,shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a dear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ❑ PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Sales Oriented Retail in MU-CBD = 30.0/1,000 x 0.75 = 2.25/ 1,000 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 44 spaces provided/34 required NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as set forth in Figure 18.765.1,with the following minimums: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planntng Division Section • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. ► Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicyde racks for this type of use: 5 spaces. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands arcas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBI 1'ED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section i1 CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA' CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25°4, 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining. >25% 10 to<50 acres 30 feet I >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine° ;Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor. NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. • Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use('Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III);Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III);Site Development Review(Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: % (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees with mature canopy cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. ❑ PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area.Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ❑ CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway,road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section I. ,y ® ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Please note that development code amendment shave occurred since the last Planning Commission approval in 2010. As such your narrative will have to address the new standards including, but not necessarily limited to, new urban forestry standards embedded in multiple chapters of the code and the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardCity Council. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building Tpermit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT HE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative, to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: John Floyd.Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-718-2429 EMAIL: johnfl @tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 6400 SE LAKE RD T 503.659.9500 SUITE 300 F 503.659.2227 & , a. _, .... PORTLAND,OR 97222 NNJW.PAC LAN D.COM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: September 11, 2013 To: Gary Pagenstecher / Tom Mcguire City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard OR 97223 From: Shawn Nguy b� Re: Walmart Store #5935-00; Tigard, OR Pre-Application Conference Request Remarks: Enclosed are the following documents submitted as a Pre-Application Conference Request for a Proposed Detailed Development Plan Modification regarding the above referenced project: • Completed City of Tigard Pre-Application Conference Request Form • Six (6) copies of the Pre-Application Narrative • Six (6) copies of Proposed Bale/Pallet Storage Area Plan BP-1, dated September 11, 2013 • PACLAND check #1570 in the amount of $651 .00 for payment of the filing fee Please contact me with any questions regarding this submittal. tiw3city04 rs 20-000-091 #23A w Walmart #5935-00 Proposed Detailed Development Plan Modification Order No. 2010-01 PC 7600 SW Dartmouth Street Tigard, OR Pre-Application Narrative Applicant: PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97222 Owner: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 2001 SE 10`h Street Bentonville, AR 72716 Proposal Description: The proposed application is for modification of the existing detailed development plan approval associated with Order No. 2010-01 PC. The noted approval was for development of an 18.16 acre vacant property with a proposed 137,900 sf anchor retail building and two additional 12,000 sf retail shop buildings. The proposed modification is associated with the anchor (Walmart) retail building. The applicant is seeking modification to add an outdoor storage area to support the operations of the Walmart store. As part of Walmart's continued effort to increase sustainability and achieve zero waste, this area will provide a storage area for items that will be recycled and re-purposed, including items such as cardboard bales, wood pallets, and plastic crates. These items will be stored for a short time until they are picked up by routine delivery services and taken off-site for recycling and re-use. The proposed outdoor storage area is approximately 12' x 113' in size and is proposed to be located behind (south) of the Walmart building. The area will be screened with a 10ft high CMU wall. The south side of the screen wall (adjacent to the stormwater management facility) will be supported on an approximate 4ft high retaining wall. Specific Question: 1 . What specific code approval criteria will be relevant to the proposal? /)/2C /46) Tigard, OR Proposed Outdoor Storage Area Code Review NOT APPLICABLE APPLICABLE 18.350.070.A. 1 TO 4. -No changes in use are proposed. 18.755 MIXED SOLID 6• WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review —No changes are proposed. 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS —No changes are proposed. Chapter 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation. —No changes are proposed. Chapter 18.715, Density Computation and Limitations. —No changes are proposed. Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. —No changes are proposed in the required buffers around perimeter of site. This section of code does not cover the screening requirement for the storage area. It covers mostly screening, buffers, and landscaping for the site. When I read through the various criteria, I don't see anything in this section that applies because the storage area is located outside of the required buffers. Chapter 18.765, Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements. — No changes are proposed. Chapter 18.790 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance Areas. -No changes are proposed. Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Improvements,- No changes are proposed. 18.350.070 Planned Development Approval Criteria 18.350.070.A.1 to 4.—Most of the criteria are not applicable with our proposal. We need clarification regarding this section. 18.620 TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS w,in• - No changes are proposed. ����l Ut��j 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - No changes are proposed. The proposed outdoor storage area will be screened with a 10ft CMU wall, which provides a barrier to protect neighboring properties from noise that might be generated from the loading and unloading cardboard bales, wood pallets, and other recycled items. Impact Studies—Trips will not increase with proposal. Trucks will come to the site to pick up bales/pallets whether or not the outdoor storage area is available. Impervious area will not increase. We are not anticipating the need to submit any additional impact studies with this proposal. September 26 2 013 September 2013 October 2013 SuMo TuWe Th Fr Sa o TuWe Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 Thursday 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2930 27 28 29 30 31 26 Thursday Notes 7 am 8 00 9 00 Pre-application Conferences CR 1 Permit Center -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings te 10 00 Walmart Storage Area;Shawn Nguy CR 1 Permit Center -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings rte, 1100 Pre-application Conferences CR - 1 Permit Center Pre•Apps_CD_Meetings 12 Pm 1 00 -- 2 00 3 00 4 00 5 00 6 00 -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings 1 9/11/2013 1:14 PM RECEIVED 111111 SEP 11 2013 City of f Tigard p CIn'of 71GgRD �NNiNG�ENGINEE TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Request RING GENERAL INFORMATION PACLAND FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Case No.: (051 .PRIG/,)OCXJ-3 Address: 6400 SE Lake Road, Ste 300 Phone: 503-659-9500 Fee: 00 City: Tigard Zip: 97222 Receipt No.: I q3 U53 Application Accepted By: M / Contact Person: Shawn Nguy Phone: 503-659-9500 Date: l l 3 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): Walmart Real Estate DATE OF PRE-APP.: _c - /3 Business Trust TIME OF PRE-APP.: 1 D: 00 PRE-APP.HELD WITH: Address: Phone:SE 10th St, MS 5570 phone: 479-273-4000 Rev.6/N/2013 Bentonville 72716-5570 a\cwpin\masters\hnd use applications\Pre-App Request App.doc City: Zip: Property Address/Location(s): 7600 SW Dartmouth Street Tigard, OR 97223 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2s101 ab - TL 101 thout the required submittal elements) C-G with PD overlay krPre-Application Conf.Request Form Zoning: 12.46 acres 6 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: IT Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that you would PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by y Site Plan. The site plan must show the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one(1)week proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference date/time to allow to scale. Also, show the location of the staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. subject property in relation to the nearest streets;and the locations of driveways on the A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of theubject property and across the street. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday Vicinity Map. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. The Proposed Uses. Topographic Information. Include Contour PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN Lines if Possible. PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER ie FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-THURSDAY. Filing Fee IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 /MEETS A-L( cab Walmart Save money.Live better. John E.Clarke Vice President of Real Estate 2001 SE 10th Street Bentonville.AR 72716-0550 Phone 479.273.8659 John.clarke@Wal-Mart.com February 27,2014 Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Walmart Store No.5935,Tigard,Oregon Casefile No. PDR2013-00003 Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, On behalf of Walmart,and in accordance with the conditions of approval regarding Casefile No. PDR2013-00003,we are submitting the following representations and information regarding Walmart's store located in Tigard,Oregon: 1. Any truck service to and from Walmart's recycling facility,including the idling of such trucks,will be restricted to 7 AM to 6 PM—daylight hours;and 2. All materials placed within the recycling enclosure will be stacked no higher than the top of the recycling facility screen(10 feet). 3. Enclosed please find Walmart's rodent/pest control plan for the store and loading/unloading area as required by one of the conditions of approval. Please let me know if you or anyone at the City have any questions regarding these representations and the rodent/pest control plan. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, - -M a . ' 'ORES,INC. J.. Cl. ke ice President o Real Estate cc: Deborah Herron, Walmart Bryan Dickerson,Pacland Shawn Nguy,Pacland Greg Hathaway,Hathaway Koback Connors LLP Walmart Save money.Live better. MEMORANDUM February 24, 2014 TO: City of Tigard FR: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. RE: Pest Management Plan for Tigard Walmart store As a condition of approval for PDR 2013-00003 (Final Order No. 2014-01 PC), the recycling storage area at Walmart's future store in Tigard,the City of Tigard's Planning Commission has asked Walmart to, "submit a rodent/pest control plan for the store and loading/unloading area." Walmart is both pro-active and aggressive in managing pests at our facilities. Our stores follow preventative protocols to maintain clean and safe environments,both interior and exterior, that are not attractive to pests. There are established and direct communication channels with regulatory agencies to ensure compliance with local policies. Additionally,we perform regular audits to assess risks of pest activity. Preventative measures include, but are not limited to: • Rotate and inspect stored supplies at a defined frequency. • Merchandise placement off the floor and away from walls • Discard trash and unused items. • Inspections and cleaning at a defined frequency • Perform housekeeping activities daily. • Remove and dispose of leaking or damaged food products when found. • Keep the exterior clean,especially around compactors and trash containers. • Eliminate standing water on the interior and exterior of the facility. • Keep all doors closed when not in use. • Maintain all door seals • Seal all cracks and openings around pipes, walls and expansion joints. • Repair or replace seals/brushes around dock plates. • Maintain plumbing and drains • Eliminate openings around refrigeration conduits At each location we maintain contracts to deploy third-party pest control specialist(s)who manage comprehensive pest control efforts—including rodents. Waimart Walmart will require that our contract provider at the Tigard facility have a customer service representative available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. When items require attention,the provider will be required to be at the facility within 24 hours. Areas to be covered by this plan include, but are not limited to: • Building's outside perimeter • Dumpster areas • Receiving/storage/stock room areas • Fresh departments (Meat, Deli, Produce, Bakery, etc) • Checkout lanes • Pharmacy • Sales Floor • Employee break area • Restrooms • Janitor's closet • Exterior storage areas (including recycling) At the conclusion of the service, the service specialist will review the Customer Service Report in detail with the Store Manager or member of the store management team.. The provider will maintain an on-site logbook at the facility that will include the facility's service history and required safety information including: • Copies of service reports • CD or hard copies of product labels and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). • Printed materials required by applicable federal,state,and local regulations including pesticide applicators' license/certification where applicable, pest control business license where required, and certificate of insurance. • Other relevant information concerning the services provided at the facility including: facility diagram, showing the location of pest equipment. Thank you and please contact us with questions at any time. 111111 1 a TIGARD City of Tigard December 17, 2013 PACLAND Attn: Shawn Nguy 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97222 RE: Completeness Review for Tigard Retail Center Modification (Case File No. PDR2013-00003) Dear Mr. Nguy: The City received your revised application materials December 11, 2013 for a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot recycling storage area at the rear of the site. The project would otherwise be consistent with the approved Tigard Retail Center permit. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the application can be deemed complete. A hearing has been scheduled for January 27, 2014 before the Planning Commission. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2434. Sincerely, 14f -vl/ _ Gary Pagenstecher,AICP Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 6400 SE LAKE RD T 503.659.9500 surrE 300 F 503.659.2227 ; PORTLAND,OR 97222 WWW.PACLAND.COM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: December 11, 2013 To: Gary Pagenstecher / Tom Mcguire City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard OR 97223 From: Shawn Nguy r1 Re: Tigard Retail Center — Outdoor Recycling Storage Area; Tigard, OR Land Use Permit Application for Planned Development Modification Remarks: In response to your Completeness Review letter dated November 27, 2013, enclosed are the following documents submitted for the above referenced project: • Response to Completeness Comments Memorandum, prepared by PACLAND and dated December 11, 2013 • Seventeen Application Binders, updated December 11, 2013 and comprised of the following documents: o Land Use Permit Application Form o Written Summary of Proposal/Narrative o Response to Development Standards o Pre-Application Conference Notes o Service Provider Letter o Proposed Site Plan o Proposed Storage Area Plan o Arborist Statement of Verification and Tree Canopy Plan • Two full size and one 8"x11"copy of Proposed Detailed Development Plan PC-1.0 and Proposed Outdoor Storage Area Plan BP-1, both dated December 2013 • Two sets of pre-addressed, stamped, #10 size envelopes • One CD with .PDF files of the submittal package Please contact me with any questions regarding this submittal. tiw3city06 rs 20-000-091 #23A 6400 SE LAKE RD T 503.659.2227 '.' surrE 300 F 503.659.2227 PORTLAND,OR 97222 WWW.PACLAND.COM # , Memorandum Date: December 11, 2013 To: Gary Pagenstecher City of Tigard From: Shawn Nguy, PE Bryan Dickerson, PE Subject: Tigard Retail Center, Tigard, OR— Outdoor Storage Area Application Minor Modification to Approved Planned Development PDR2008-00001 Response to Completeness Comments This memorandum is in response to the city completeness review comments, dated November 27, 2013, associated with the above noted application for the outdoor storage area. The completeness review comments are addressed as follows: 1. Application Materials. Please include 11" x 17" plans for both BP-1 and PC-1.0 in your application packet copies. Response: BP-1 was originally intended to be used for the pre-application meeting, but has been included with this submittal as requested. Refer to the revised application binders. 11"xl7"plans for both BP-1 and PC-i are included with the revised application package. 2. Urban Forestry Plan. The narrative includes findings for the Urban Forestry Plan on page 12. Please revise to reference the exhibit(TC-1.0) by name and summarize and interpret the information in the Site Tree Canopy Table. It is unclear how the site could have an effective coverage of 83%. Response: The calculations for the effective canopy area have been revised to only take into account trees that, at the time of planting, will meet the city's minimum caliper size, height, and soil volume requirements per the Urban Forestry Manual. The calculations no longer include the additional canopy coverage that will be provided by over 1,000 trees being planted within the buffer and detention pond areas. If these trees were to be counted, the effective canopy would be much higher. Refer to page 12 and 13 of the updated code response and the Arborist Statement of Verification included with the revised application package. 3. Development Engineering(Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462) commented that "it appears that the proposed storage area may extend into the detention pond area. The application needs to clearly show that the storage facility is either outside the detention pond area or that the full function of the detention pond will be preserved after the storage facility is constructed." See attached Checklist. Page 2 of 2 Response to Completeness Review Documentation December 11, 2013 Response: The proposed storage area and associated retaining wall is located outside of the functional capacity of the detention pond. Refer to page 4 of the updated project narrative and BP-1, which provides additional information associated with the storage area location and the pond stage elevation for various storm events. 4. TVF&R(John Wolff, 503-259-1504) noted that "the distance of the storage from the building will require that any openings, in this case the exterior door, shall have sprinkler protection extended to protect the opening." See attached email. Response: Based on further coordination with NFR, the minimum clearance requirements are met such that there is no requirement for a sprinkler protection system at the exterior door. Refer to page 4 of the updated project narrative, which provides additional information regarding how the current proposal complies with the fire code. See also attached email from John Wolf dated 12/4/13. 5. Envelopes with postage. Please supply two sets of pre-addressed (no return address), stamped (not metered), #10 size envelopes. Addresses must have been obtained within the previous three months from the date of application completeness Response: The required envelopes and postage are provided. Refer to submittal package. 6. Number of Application Copies. As this is a planned development request, all members of the commission will receive copies. Please submit 17 full sets of your revised application materials(each set shall be an exact duplicate of all information pertaining to the application, narrative, forms, letters, studies, plans, etc.). In addition, two full-size plan sets, one 8 1/2" x 11" reduced plan set for our files, and a CD of the submittal package shall be included. Response: The required number of application copies is provided. Refer to submittal package. i ~ TIGARD November 27, 2013 City of Tigard PACLAND Attn: Shawn Nguy 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97222 RE: Completeness Review for Tigard Retail Center — Minor Modification to Approved Planned Development PDR2008-00001 (Case File No. PDR2013- 00003) Dear Mr. Nguy: The City received your application November 14, 2013 for a minor modification to the approved Tigard Retail Center Planned Development (PDR2008-00001). The 18.16-acre vacant property is located within the Tigard Triangle southwest of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue. The proposed modification would add a 1,356 square foot recycling storage area at the rear of the site. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Application Materials. Please include 11" x 17" plans for both BP-1 and PC-1.0 in your application packet copies. 1,--- 2. Urban Forestry Plan The narrative includes findings for the Urban Forestry Plan on page 12. Please revise to reference the exhibit (TC-1.0) by name and summarize and interpret the information in the Site Tree Canopy Table. It is unclear how the site could have an effective coverage of 83%. ✓ 3. Development Engineering (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462) commented that "it appears that the proposed storage area may extend into the detention pond area. The application needs to clearly show that the storage facility is either outside the detention pion area or that the full function of the detention pond will be preserved after the storage facility is constructed." See attached Checklist. 4. TVF&R Qohn Wolff, 503-259-1504) noted that "the distance of the storage from the building will require that any openings, in this case the exterior door, shall have sprinkler protection extended to protect the opening." See attached email. — 5. Envelopes with postage. Please supply two sets of pre-addressed (no return address), stamped (not metered), #10 size envelopes. Addresses must have been obtained within the previous three months from the date of application completeness. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov ✓6. Number of Application Copies. As this is a planned development request, all members of the commission will receive copies. Please submit 17 full sets of your revised application materials (each set shall be an exact duplicate of all information pertaining to the application, narrative, forms, letters, studies, plans, etc.). In addition, two full-size plan sets, one 8 '/z" x 11" reduced plan set for our files, and a CD of the submittal package shall be included. Once the application has been deemed complete,a hearing before the Planning Commission will be scheduled. Your preference for January 20, 2013 may be accommodated and is currently available. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2434. Sincerely, 7I- Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner 2 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: 7600 SW Dartmouth Storage COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 11/25/13 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. N/A ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? N/A ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. N/A ® Geotech study submitted? N/A STREET ISSUES ® Right-of-way clearly shown. N/A ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. N/A ® Street name(s) shown. N/A ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. N/A ® Street profiles shown. N/A ® Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ® Traffic Impact and/or Access Report N/A ® Street grades compliant? N/A ® Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? N/A ® Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width N/A appropriate? ® Other: N/A SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. N/A ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? N/A ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? N/A ® Proposed meter location and size shown? N/A ® Proposed fire protection system shown? N/A STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? N/A ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? It appears that the proposed storage area may extend into the detention pond area. The application needs to clearly show that the storage facility is either outside the detention pond area or that the full function of the detention pond will be preserved after the storage facility is constructed. ® Area for facility match requirements from calcs? N/A ® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? N/A ® Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A REVISED: 11/26/13 The submittal is hereby deemed [' COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: I -l``k4s Mc,CG7ml y Date: 11/25/13 REVISED: 11/26/13 LAND USE APPLICATION Project: 7/� 2-/ 3 Date: // ' /),M43 3 ? /3 COMPLETENESS REVIEW _ COMPLETE j INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: j /1/4E-Deed/Title/Proof of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes,List of Attendees, Impact Study(18.390) USA Service Provider Letter '4G-- Construction Cost Estimate Envelopes with Postage (Verify Count) #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"Paper Copies" "ii Pre-Application Conference Notes #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's" PROJECT STATISTICS: „E 'Building Footprint Size %of Landscaping On Site ,ems Lot Square Footage ,2�/o of Building Impervious Surface On Site PLANS DIMENSIONED: i Building Footprint 1)&.a-" Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking)')Truck Loading Space Where Applicable 1! :uilding Height Ff Access Approach and Aisle 4519- Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Vicinity Map (7✓ Architectural Plan (V 6E1--" Tree Inventory :IQ Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Site Plan if&El Lighting Plan TREE PLAN I MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ D D ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ,Er 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ Zr 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ,12:r 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) • ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\orms-revised\iand use application completeness review dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07 / / , ,1 — II // / ` j SITE DATA BUILDING DATA PROPOSED TRAFFIC ~. J 1 RETAIL 1 12,000 gt SIGNAL-SEE 1 ( . � I PABffI GROSS AREA RETAIL 2 12.000 gt ROADWAY PLATYS .. ,� RETAIL 2 TOT 1) 2.57 AC3 RETAIL J 137,900 SEt j) TOTAL BUILDING AREA 161,900 SF4 I RETAIL 3 LO1}) 12.16 AC3 1 /f, - •o,y HERYOSO M DEDICAntN 0.05 AC3 2511AcK M0300 ! TOTAL 18.16 ACS ' . CO�UN1Y eua ;,C,-.G ZONE MUE ZONE � � ' -„ �Z•-.• \ �,` 1 (MIXED USE PARKING DATA / _ (c2 4i ) RETAIL, (12.000 gf BUILDING AREA) r+ �� Aafl,AI EASEMENT EMPLOYMENT) / _ � 2510,BA-0010, NOTES STANDARD STALLS 64 STALLS COMPACT STAL15 1 STALLS / 1 �I �`` 11M-COUNTY 1 DRAWNG BASED ON SURVEY BY YCYAT A/0 ACCESSBIE STALLS J STALLS / '1. 1 ♦ CENTER TRUST `L— ' ❖�•�• \� POTENTIAL FUTURE SP09TO,MC.DATED APRIL 16,2007(UPDATED l(/ � -A❖.❖.•j R 4 BICYCLE X` ACC SS 1OCA11ON JULY 24,2006). TOTAL 1 .--:..••♦i�i�i�•�� PARIbIC �\ PARKING RAID:5.67/1,000 7 //V r : 11•:1-...,�.4��•❖:❖:••�\� y••/ r....��:1:C•:..•�•ai�., 1 REM.2 (12.000 SF3 BULGING AREA) PARKING DATA NOTES; STANDARD STALLS 51 STALLS II 1.ALL CALCULATIONS BASED ON TOTAL CQPACT STALLS 8 STALLS .• 47 I CROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE Of AOLES51dE STALLS 3 STALLS ,4 BUILDING.(COUNT INCLUDES TOTAL 62 STALLS l A{}' , ///////////i 10'1(18'7RA9i EJlO.O 118E ACCESSBLE STALLS AND STALLS 1 •. •. ., ® PARKING RA110:517/1.000 9" y;;; 4�4 �' ARCH.P NS 7RIgf ROUTE 31 USED BY CART CORRALS) / / I,,' ,•• r — _— a 2 PARING SHOWN CONTAINS 9'x18.5' RETAIL 3 (137.900 9 j BUILDING AREA) / > 1: is F a.'lllllllllllllll'c a a a a 9 9 a 90'PARKMG STALLS COMPACT i::•:r LOT 2 FA \_ _ STANDARD TALL STALLS 180 STALLS L.•.. _ 4/� '' g� Ti STALLS ARE 9'x15't 9'd6'AS CQPNCT STALLS 145 STAL15 1 i--:•'-1 i 90181 MTH 26'ALOE WIDTH TYP. CART BLE STALLS 13 STALLS • CLEM AREA Of WEED PLANT OVERGROWTH Q '•1 i AL I J.Ott REQIRED PARONC: CMT CORRAL STALLS 24 STALLS / / i ,'Y 12 0(10 gt �i r y �� — e e e e AND INSTALL 6'CHNNl1NK FENCE M1H YMAKIM PARKMG RARQ 3.7 PER WTAL 562 STALLS x FFE_,86.5 BLACK PRIVACY SLATS ON PROPERrY LME-F ••_%/// I !71►. ® yj 1,000 g MAOYUY PARONG RA110: PARN/1G RATIO 4.07/1,OD0 g.,�! I � _ �® Q 6.2 PER t,000 g(PARONC Zp1E B) • Wil 1 �' r.iO I a s a a a 4.UP TO SOX R REQUIRED PARKMG TOTAL SITE 692 STALLS: 4.27/1,000 g RAM)•.r I .1 a ,IV, STALLS NAY COMPLY MTH THE / I L i :t. I 11 11111111 IIR� B'PEDESTRIAN/J STANDARD$FOR COMPACT STALLS/ � '•'•L r• /•1 'll P`I BN(E PATH 1: •:> e e e LEGEND •:�1�`:-:>i� ii a a a a •`y � ��PROPOSED GUIDING I I r :••' ••:1: 5�jt} .O .�O\_•. CONCRETE aI R A G11T1ER i■m 1 , ::�:.:.:_.:-_7�..._.....:._...._•.• ' 1.1 r � c il'1 !� 'Q 3 �.:�:.�PROPER TUNE :::: — 4 _REiIANDS LINE•. •� ��� ® 11 • 4 ®� RETAL 3 PARKMC STALLS PER ROW / 1 /•• � ..:"+SaI « a a a !f 'y-•VY�••♦'•�'• �a a a a > > > — 7\ NULHR OF OUTLOT PARKING STALLS PER ROW / of •ai!:::::• c c c c c c c [] •.• ••. .. • ` ... _ - L - , CONCRETE 90EwAlK PAYEYENT I 1J '• - 1,1 ••••••••� - 1 DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT YMKMGS $ ...::::::-.1....:: �•�•�•�•c 20 BIC1C E I 5'PEDESTRIAN c COMPACT STALL / _ ——_—I %%V*. PARKING SPACES C a• ;v V PATH i MAK ...._.. t5. ALLES9BlL STALL iT _ ® y •••f `I `•! R:AHINGwALL•. i - [g CART CORRAL I ::,.........".::".1:::...2.{ — 1 �' '1.11' M'/Ili%IMM ii I ri iv •�[} j}-c 1! �ti °tom �. ILi1'! [■r•. _ NAM ENMY/p0T LOT 3 l I--''' :- y a = !15P. $ . 6 I WETINO BUFFER gff a. , TALI a1, AI' 11.1:: Wa l ma rt:': SCREEN WALL A _ 6'wa� 1y(,a- © a a a PmE51T6M PLAZAS 1 A If T�`r C-138-NO-NO _ I !�!i�3 CONCRETE BY ARCHITECT / ti L•:. e e e 1"1� 7� 1•(e e e 137.900 gt PROPO9D 12'tl13'RECTQIlG STONAGE �� 777 • ,_- FFE:180.00 ., f ASPHALT PATH I :L a ASSOOAIE AREA MTH 10'CYU SCR@I WAIL .:�•� 1 a+�Y : • �' ® •CrZONE 1 MUE ZONE ow � � 6 numOOl yc , I n� `R 11� EMPLOYMENT) t :-_PEDESTRIAN PLAZA AREA A ' , 1/ r TRUCK(ROJTE © �0 o / s� 4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 7-4— a a Q //// \•.•. 'L`4••%O;M•••••. 1tN1111DPili1:,1/ PEDESTRIM PLAZA '. r r:•���y�. i. I a a y ,,,1 • 1 ■ VEGETATED l+y:' , : LOT 1 `�h - ' 1C(MRIDOR-92/, ' .-7-'-"" ■ �: RETAIL 1��a4.�,- y rlr. e e O y ,• ' n'r f I• •WLRANDS 50'VA:7LANDD ::::1::::: ::;:.:::::.• ♦ 12,000 gt '� %a a a a O ••a4 Ala 1 I �/ BUFFER ...•.}'/ x\t A•YA FFE z 176 !4�`0. . :( N• ]{(\ •••ti•.•...:_ ::::.. 1 x` 4' •41 0 I WD"�., I S Ni.........--___....... -/ :::::::::::::::....i...:1",::::.::,::- 1 'i 4 EwR PER k O — �i�� ------ y. EATSnNG : .,4 n / / W NE M0 p MCI.PLANS , a a > a O a TRUCK ROUTE 16 - / I \` 'S� '�\\� BWNIN,RYIARK ,'�, 44 a a PAUMt. , 0�A �♦ \ .••.•. .. \ . '"?es•+•wer. .. UNIT OF EXISTING BUFFER a.;V•._• • 3) ' d 2, N GRAPHIC SCALE r in - 1 I 2 3 J 4 I 5 I 6 7 I S 1 9 10 I 11 12 13 l 14 I 15 16 I 17 I i '11, 1 ..X , \s,,,::::;„ \ ''.::::::,..:,11 I- i 7.%:::::11::::;:i:ii:...i', _,,,.;:c., I '/II Py,�� _� ■ - - - ■ — — — — CO ``,,\:\\\�\- 1`\''',V 1 ,` ° '�S'7, © SW NER�MO$O M'AY ! �► ` i T-�.-.-.-.-_.— 11 ��` % '� { — ' is TP 78.10 D / z i I .. .... ' ' 441% I 1G 178.60 •:�� \`\� _ III . �--�_ r.. ∎ 4♦ o♦ ;::.:::>:. ---41 : 7i111111111111‘ 111101- 0 ■ E I - „1"1 t1 ' ��♦�,/r♦1ir. �li•1i .- -w.X74 »s -��'- =114111'°' wol�mart.,, 1i 14.4": 4P 11 -► i I 1t 1 \ , -gym q PROPOSED 12 0113 W TDOOR STORAGE AREA /� �► ./� �� ►• FAWTY� 5 , I. 5� / W/10FT HIGH SCREEN WALLS OVER • ,• • I ♦ ► •! ►� ' I•/ �- ••••• "<g APPROXIMATE 4FT RETAINING WALL. 0,., 4 I.•I•.,1 ''' V-►r4 ' - i �•F i — ,-s ! I SR.I:�.�►►_�.IRd∎ i _ ,•-•. ;-i / 1 ) / 1 1 .„,/\ // ____ \,•/ i ( ; ... Iii❖•' n' . .,z.•::::.' ' I STORM NT DST AT 'X444 ���1 \ n -i 11111+ ELEVATION 175.02 FT.NE STORAGE FACILITY IS i••: I ' /- . / •,�, �•' .. -.._ LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE FUNCTIONAL ■�•:•�p� "/ .�I} � .1. '.'., G `',�` a•� CAPACITY OF THE DETENTION FACILITY. TP 1 - • ' l yi cI .•..tom a- . SITE VICINITY MAP PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA H SCALE: 1'=100' SCALE: 1" =20' 1 A H j. J 8 t S x Q all 1 co DECEMBER 2013 r , Walmart i�: #5935-00 PROPOSED OUTDOOR BP-1 1 PLANNED DEV. 7600 SW DARTMOUTH ST STORAGE AREA 69W SE Lake Road T(503)659-9500 pI� OR(� �f�� 0- 71M. ...1. ..M - - Suite 300 F(503)659-2227 D OR 97223 SN 20-W1-091 vomand oQ97222 v+.a� L'.1 / 1 1 I u tt °W4,4.6 a° 2SIOIBA-coal /� / 1 ♦ .100 251018A-00700 CENTER TRUST C(ACKANAS / lO�►�•••::, 1 . O°O COUNTY BANK / ••••••••••�. X00 -� - � N_/ ~� r •''`� �!' , _..% / ••••••••••• _ %t w 01••oe 5••IOe•0.iY1V'►'.-it;n6 ♦ei re.re re41leel,e e•O O O v V1 �- I G / / / ................v..... �y°°',.�.•••••a•,s•oviiY,10°O ••e:r:•�.:.a:o� 01 0.=.t. lOdi!ii! •�:i!i!s:e� °��O�►� /j� / / $� 4. y - .mss-'_-; .'w„,--� 4,,,,„-"..1.,%,,,' °.►a►/ 4 4 441/ #__ ;� L (�_ .: / l +. F RETAIL —' `i 'zu It �• i !f•i' FEE=1865 7.; :4::• tr/ '4 '0,', V:•/' :►. .....:, 0 41.' .**077,„„..,441.,41:4:4':::.7....:4,:.....ii.,,;.:4,,,,,‘":6--,A.:-'-'1,:":::4",,t, / �1r °°ems •►�— I 11► I' /' i i'i♦••►•i i^iii:••, o a o pe •.,47,I '... 1111 i / i^°'• 1 I 1111A,]11, , C v ' :1:::::ef o. • �.. •iii . °. �: • �o / �% , •iii ••••:+v. W. - Rv +, / 40, •• ..••••••• a-s °e• �' WY a w) 4 e•• LOT •••••• LEGEND •• iiiii I IIpD�MNn itf. •PiNiP/ ` ••••• Walmart I.i L / I I *RANDS BUFFER PLANTINGS ' / / �.. ® th, "i' 44+:04 C-178-NO-NC , i I LANDSCAPE AREA PLANTINGS / / 4., �_ J ��•�•�•�• 137.900 Sri a / �1 / s 40. p, �•�•I•�•3 FEE=180.00 • / %�.JI ®WSPNC TREE STANDS CANOPY AREA(63,915 sf) (J C. ' t i /_ �a� s•� n _ _,Ilw 0 is leo /// ' / ',7!----------- -- . --!-'1.--,-----.t.--17.741v.wer. . !,. , arill, .fo ”. „i . /. ...,,,,,, . .. . ., , .. , , , p„.„/„.._,,., : 4*.../.,,,,,,..,,...,..-,..,,,,., ..,... ..w. wit, i :i . Ng" // / f ',j i ce••:~• • ;. • r� ,••••w • / /,,% 86"1-0,5Y` LOT 1 bid;' _/ .� a fs st / '. RETAIL LEA / E •. �� ei _ :Ai METLANDS B •_•_mil I •J} i . r j/ ��� ��� Jar z rlS#_ sS l�,R'w �•O '�,,7-1.---- O •°0 7/e Ol•• • . i � EXISTING TREE STAND,/ 00 s1 ,� t• �•l �•x VII •A ••e' //i ��/� �/0./ •••• 6, 1 / vna�- / / ///i. �f///i, O'LO•° A G�2itiii P, �7/1:2„205s�Gj��! „. .n lC.CrO, Mf IEANDS a GRAPHIC SCALE .. (s rm) 1 00-40 It TIGARD RETAIL CENTER SITE TREE CANOPY i 1 1 December 2013 Tigard, Oregon COVERAGE EXHIBIT TC-1 ,Q 6.00 S61ate Ram '(503)6549500 S,t.000 F(503)656-2227 R.Wtl.C•97222 ••➢xlwnm.