City Council Packet - 08/20/2013 •
IN
• City of Tigard
Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD
•
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & CITY CENTER
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20, 2013 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW
Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Times noted are estimated.
Assistive listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please
call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (MD - Telecommunications Devices for
the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow
as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday
preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE:
http://live.tigard-or.gov
Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows:
Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28
•Every Sunday at 7 a.m.
•Every Monday at 1 p.m.
•Every Wednesday at 2 p.m.
•Every Thursday at 12 p.m.
•Every Friday at 3 p.m.
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
• City of Tigard
TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & CITY CENTER
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20, 2013 - 6:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW
Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223
6:30 PM
•EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an
Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced
identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may
disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to
attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any
information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any
final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
1. WORKSHOP MEETING
A. Call to Order- City Council & City Center Development Agency
B. Roll Call
C. Pledge of Allegiance
D. Council Communications & Liaison Reports
E. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. BRIEFING ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) PROJECTS 6:35
pm estimated time
3. DISCUSSION ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
PRIORITIZATION 6:50 pm estimated time
4. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON A REQUEST TO ABANDON LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) NO. 1 7:35 pm estimated time
5. BRIEFING ON AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TO
PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE TO RIVER TERRACE 7:45 pm estimated time
6. DISCUSSION ON TOPICS FOR UPCOMING COMMUNITY SURVEY 7:55
pm estimated time
Convene City Center Development Agency
7. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AWARDING A TARGETED
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MATCHING GRANT 8:20 pm estimated time
•EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Center Development Agency will go into
Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All
discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided
by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive
Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final
decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 8:40 pm estimated time
8. NON AGENDA ITEMS
9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
10. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 pm estimated time
2
AIS-1237
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length(in minutes): 15 Minutes
Agenda Title: Briefing on Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)Projects
Prepared For: Mike Stone Submitted By: Greer Gaston,Public Works
Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
The council will be briefed on the status of CIP projects at the close of the 2012-2013 fiscal year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST
No action is requested;the council is asked to listen to the briefing and provide feedback on any additional information
it would like to receive in future updates.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
In order to keep the council informed on the status of CIP projects,staff provides regular project briefings.At this
meeting,staff will update the council on the status of CIP projects at the close of fiscal year 2012-2013.
Selected projects may be discussed in more detail.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable
COUNCIL GOALS,POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
None
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Staff provides the council with regular briefings on the status of CIP projects.
Attachments
CIP Project Status Report for the Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2012-2013
ill CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Projects',Owned by the Public Works Department,Engineering Miriam soma coder:
D=Design,C=Constmcl,00,S=Study,M=Wetland Monitoring
,/=Completed(\t'ainng Certificate of Completion)
m ROW Fl 12-13 Overall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name a Project No. Number Funding Source Esm't Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Spent to Percent Remarks
a+ Rcy'd y Date Completion
STREETS
Pavement Management
Program(Overlay) Baker Rock
Pavement Management .sJ 95001 412 Street Maintenance No No CR Contracting $1,730,000 $1,662,550 100% -` 12/13 work completed
Program(Crack Seal) -133/14 construction completed
Pavement Management
Program(Slurry Seal) Blackline
Citywide Pedestrian&Cyclist ROW Murry,Smith&
Improvements D 95027 200 Gas Tax Esm't No Assoc. $141,000 $17,809 10% 60n Design plans completed
Transportation -60°%o Design plans completed(on hold)
Pacific Highway/Gaarde 405 Development Tax
lopm ROW -R/W&Easements acquisition underway
Street/McDonald Street D 95033 Esm't CWS WI-I Pacific $242,265 $221,121 25% Bid 1/14
-Improvements IGA ODOT/OTIA
-Completion 12/14
-60%
410 Traffic Impact Fees CWS/ Epic land Design plans completed
72nd Avenue/Dartmouth D 95035 ROW DSL/ Solutions/ $1,405,000 $116,963 �5 -R/W&Easements acquisition underway-
Intersection
Improvement Esm't W1{Pacific -Bid 1/14
200 Gas Tax Corps -Completion 9/14
200 Gas Tax DSL/ CES NW/ -100°/Design plans completed
92nd Avenue Sidewalk ROW -R/W&Easements acquisition underway
(Waverly Drive to Cook Park) C 95037 Cstri t CWS/ Hanna $490,000 $127,073 50" -Bid 7/23/13
510 Stormwater Corps McEldowney Completion 11/13
I:\ENG\CIP Power Point For Council\2013_Fourth_Quarter_Status Reportxls
Printed:8/62013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 1 of 8
la CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Projects performed by the Public Works Department,Engineering Division Status Codes:
D=Idemtm,C=Constmcoon,S=Study,M=\Ccd nd Monironng
il=Completed(\C tome■,mficare of Completion)
ROW FY 12-13 Overall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name =I Project No. Funding Source Esm't Spent to Percent I<,■■∎.”L,
Number Required Contractor Budgeted Amount
iii Req'd Datc Completion
STREETS
201 Gas Tax
530 Water
Major Streets -100%Design plans completed
Main Street/Green Street OBEC/
'Transportation ROW CWS/ -R/W,Easements&Permits acquired
Retrofit D 971103 lGA Improvement Esm't ODOT FIFIPR/ 51,295,484 5302,690 50". -Bid pleb 13
Phase 1 Barney&Worth
Program will)) -Completion 1/1/15
Metropolitan
IC Transportation
Improvement
Program
•
1:1ENGICIP Power Point For Councill2013_FOUM_Quarter_Status Report.ols
Printed:8182013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 2 of 8
CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Projects performed by the Public Works Department,Engineering ngineering Dierrion Scotus Cones:
D=Design,C=Construction.S=Study,M=wetland Monitoring
If .=mpk oil\tsnmc Certificate of(:ompletion)
ROW FY 12-13 Overall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name s Project No. Number Funding Source Esnet Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Spent to Percent (c mi i. 1.
to Req'd Date Completion
PARKS
I Parks Bond Westlake
_ Consulting/
-Design plans completed
•
IV AV Walter Knapp& -R/W,Easements&Acquisitions completed
last Butte I leritage Park C 92003 425 Parks SDC CWS $523,750 $245,682 75" Permits acquired
ISsm't Associates/ -Awarded 6/11/13
Da Neal
TBD TBD Construction -Completion 9/13
-Scope of project increased
-Design plans completed
Casscrh -R/W,Easements&Acquisitions completed
Fanno Creek House C 92006 421 Parks Bond N/A CWS $65,000 $121,494 1r,. -Permits acquired
Landscaping
-Budget adjustment 4/13
-Awarded 6/11/13
-Completion 8/30/13
Dirksen Nature Park WFI Pacific/
-50°'n Master plan completed
(Summer Creek Park) S 92016 421 Parks Bond ROW
CWS/ Ash Creek Forest $400,000 $84,302 25% Permits in process
COT M t. -Bid TBD
-Completion TBD
Mears Design -Tree Planting&Maintenance
Tree Canopy Replacement
C 92017 260 Urban Forestry N/A N/A Group/Casserly $125,000 $35,000 N/A -Full amount was not programmed due to loss of
Program
(
Landscaping arborist
-Predesign conceptual plans completed
ROW CWS/ OTAK/ -Being reviewed by staff
Sunrise Park 'D 92020 421 Parks Bond
Esm't COT Conservation $445,000 $34,192 I0" Permits 113D
Techniques -Bids TBD
-Completion TBD
-Design plans completed
-
Jack Park C 92022 421 Parks Bond ROW CWS/ Green Thumb $335,000 $69,760 Su" Permits acquired
Esm't COT -Awarded 7/9/13
-Completion 12/31/13
I:\ENG\CIP Power Point For Council\2013_Foueth_Ouarter Status Repoctxis
Printed:8/52013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 3 of 8
ill CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Projects performed by the Public Workr Deportment,f ngineering Division Status Codes:
D=Design,C=Construction,S=Study,M=Wetland Monitoring
J=r:ompk,d(Waning Certificate ofCompletion>
ROW FY 12-13 Overall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name m Project No, Funding Source Esm't Spent to Percent it,,, ,,L.
Number Req'd Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Date Completion
iii I'\I1 K"
425 Parks SDC
421 Parks Bond
-Design plans completed
210 Stormwatcr CWS/ -Permits acquired
Fanno Creek Trail ROW Greg Schroeder
Main Street to Grant Avenue C 92024 Esm't Enterprises(GSE)DSL/ $339,250 $34,971 50'/. -R/W&Easements acquisition completed
5(1(1 Sanitary Sewer Esm't Corps -Award 7/23/13
-Completion 12/1/13
Metro Greenspacc
TBD
425 Parks SDC
Conservation
Park Land Acquisition S 92026 ROW N/A Techniques $4,550,000 $2,350,000 50%n Additional properties under study
421 Parks Bond
Downtown Land Acquisition S 92028 421 Parks Bond ROW N/A TBD $1,360,000 $0 0% TBD
Downtown Park S 92029 421 Parks Bond ROW CWS/ TBD $336,628 $0 OF n TBD
Improvements Esm't COT
-Preliminary concept plan completed
ROW/ CWS/ CES NW/ -Boundary/topographic survey completed
Tigard Street Trail D 92034 421 Parks Bond IGA COT/ Walker Macy $125,000 $5,054 25% -Draft IGA under review
ODOT Rail -Award TBD
-Completion TBD
COT-TI'SD Park Development S 92035 421 Parks Bond ROW/ CWS/ TBD $156,000 $0 0",, TBD
Partnership IGA COT
Damaged Tree Replacement S 92037 421 Parks Bond N/A COT N/A $25,000 $5,000 Ono Program is being developed by]'arks Department in
Program the absence of an arborist
1:\ENG\CIP Power Point For Council\2013_Fourth_Quarter_Status Report.xls
Printed:8/612013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 4 of 8
II CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Pnijeas performed by the Pith&U w1-c Department,Engineering Op- Status Codes:
D=Design,C=Construction,S=Study,M=Wetland Monitoring
,r=complen,J',I 1,nm'r brofarc of Compkdon)
z ROW FY 12-13 Overall
o Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Namc 3 Project No. Number Funding Source Esm't
Required Contractor Budgeted Amount
Spent to Percent It.n.0 L
cn Req'd
Date Completion
\\\1 I.12.
Water Meter Replacement
C 96003 530 Water N/A N/A N/A $200,000 $76,111 25%o Ongoing program to replace older meters
Program
Ongoing program to upsize existing water lines as
Water Main Line Oversizing S 9(,008 532 Water CIP FOW N/A TBD $80,000 $0 0"o reflected in the water master plan in conjunction with
public/private infrastructure
Aquifer Storage&Recovery
S 96010 532 Water CIP ROW CWS/ Murry,Smith&
;2,880,000 $36,251 Project definition underway to determine project
5
Well#3 Esm't COT Assoc. scope&specific needs
ROW COT/ While some aspects of the project remain in design,
Lake Oswego-Tigard Water
Partnership C 96018 532 Water CIP Esm't COLO/ Various $16,771,500 $7,461,988 40% significant construction contracts(intakes&treatment
IGA COWL, plant)have been awarded while this work continues
The Johnson Street waterline extension(#96032 in FY
Water Line Replacement ROW COT/ NLV Services/ 13/14 CIP)was identified as a project to eliminate(2)
P D 96024 530 Water $140,000 $11,780 25%
Program Esm't DSL Vigil-Agrimis dead end lines. It is being included in#93010 for FY
13/14
Fire Hydrant Replacement C 96028 530 Water N/A N/A N/A $100,000 $94,141 900'0 Ongoing program to replace older fire hydrants
Program
-Design completed
Main Street Waterline D 0X,[)29 532 Water CIP ROW ( / HHPR/COT 8420,000 $29,844 50%
b Permitting completed
Replacement Esm't ()DOT -Bid 9/26/13
-Completion 11/1/14
Pipeline Connecting 550 Zone t , ROW CIVS/
to 530 Zone
S X6031) 532 Water CIP Esm't TBD $1,305,000 $0 0% On hold pending further study
Wash Co
Annual Fire Flow ROW COT/ Ongoing program to study&implement additional
S 96031 532 Water CIP TBD $100000' $1,500 5"0
Improvement Program Esm't Wash Co water projects to improve fire flows within'Tigard
1:1ENG\CIP Power Point For Cound112013_Fourth_Ouarter_Status Report.xls
Printed:8/6/2013 10'25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 5 of 8
IS CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Projects performed by the Public I1-ork c Deperfinent,Engineering Dirisies Stan,.Codes:
D=Design,C=Construction,S=Study,M=Wetland Monitoring
4-Completed(Waiting Certificate of Completion)
ROW FY 12-13 Overall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name 5 Project No. Number Funding Source Esm't Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Spent to Percent Remarks
to Req'd Date Completion
SANITARY SEWER
Citywide Sanitary Sewer ROW CWS/ Ongoing program to upsize existing sanitary sewer
Extension Program S 93002 500 Sanitary Sewer Esm't COT 77I1) $212,500 $1,765 I lines as reflected in the sanitary sewer master plan in
conjunction with public/private infrastructure
CWS/ Ongoing program to address mini system
Sanitary Sewer Major COT/
Maintenance Pic g,a n C 93003 500 Sanitary Sewer N/.'\ 1�`I/ T13D $102,000 $17,027 20%
maintenance/replacement/repair as determined by
(;t field crews or TV inspections(Red Rock Creek)
cps
Fanno Creek Slope Design complete
-ROW CWS/ AMEC Earth& -Permitting 50%complete
Stabilization D 93009 500 Sanitary Sewer $540,736 $63,868 40'.
Esm t 13S1.. Environmental -Bid 3/14
(Arthur Court) -Completion 6/14
-Design complete
Main Street Sewer/ OBEC/ -Permitting 50%complete
Fanno Creek D 93011 500 Sanitary Sewer N/A (:'A S Westlake $206,000 $51,883 50".. -R/W 50"'n complete
Crossing Elimination Consultants -Bid 10/13
-Completion 1/14
-Boundary&topographic survey completed
128thAvenuc/Shore Drive ROW CWS/ -Re-alignment alternatives being developed
Sewer Replacement S 93012 500 Sanitary Sewer Esm t DSI. CES NW $751,485 $5,491 10% -Bid TBD
-Completion 771D
-Boundary&topographic survey completed
-
East T `7'
Sewer Replacement S 93013 500 Sanitary Sewer ROW CWS/ CI„S NW $196,500 500 $5,524 10”„ Re-alignment alternatives being developed
' ry` Esm't DSL -Bid TBD
-Completion TBD
-Preliminary studies completed
CWS/ -R/W Acquired
Benchview Creek Sewer Water AMEC Earth&
Stabilization D 93014 511 G / uanti ROW DSL/ Environmental $545,513 15 -Scoping for final design&construction upstream
ry' ty Corps -Bid 3/14
Completion 10/14
I:\ENG\CIP Power Point For Councul2013_Fourth_Ouarter_Status Report.xls
Printed:8/62013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 6 of 8
CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter- Ending 6/30/13
Projeds performed by the Pubie Works Department.1:ngineering Ditirion Status Codes:
D=Design,C=Constntction,S=Study,M=Wetland Stonimnng
,1=Completed(Waiting Certificate ofCompkrlrm)
ROW F1'12-13 Otcrall
Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name r, Project No. Number Funding Source Esm't Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Spent to Percent Remark.
Req'd Date Completion
SANITARY SEWER
5(8) Sanitary Sewer Ongoing program to address min=system
ROW CWS/
Sewer Rehabilitation Program S 93016 TBD $305,000 $0 (I% maintenance/replacement/repair as determined by
Clean Water Esm't COT
XXX field crews or TV inspections
Services
Tree Planting Summer Creek Design and installation of riparian restoration sites at
(121st Avenue to Mary • 94020 500 Sanitary Sewer N/A N/A COT $44,000 $17,928 90° Fanno Creek House,Ash Creek,Colony Creek,and
Woodward Elementary) Fanno Creek Trail
I:\ENGIC IP Power Point For Council\2013_FOUnh_Quarter_Status Reportxls
Printed:8/6/2013 10:25 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 7 of 8
il CIP PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Fourth Quarter-Ending 6/30/13
Pmjeds performed by the Public Works Deharlmenl,Engineering Division Sums Codes:
D=Design,C=Constmction,S=Study,M=Wetland Monitoring
If i,•In plc rrd rn army,,r(heave of Completion)
ROW FY 12-13 Overall
H Funding Permits Consultant/ FY 12-13
Project Name y Project No. Number Funding Source Esm't
Required Contractor Budgeted Amount Spent to Percent It
Required
Rcq'd Date Completion
STORM SEWER
Storm Drainage NI:j,.r ROW CWS/ Ongoing program to address major system
Maintenance C 94001 5111 Stormwater Fsm't COT TBD $50,000 $18,868 40°'n maintenance/replacement/repair as determined by
field crews or"rV inspections
-Design 90%complete
Culvert Improvements- -Permitting 50%complete
ROW CWS/ NLV Services/
Walnut Street 1) 94011 510 Stomnwater $141,807 $70,602 40°'o -R/W 50%complete
(Deny Dell/Fanno Creek Esm't COT Vigil-Agrimis -Bid 3/14
-Completion 12/14
-Design 90'4 complete
Copper Creek Bank ROW CWS/ AMEC Earth& -Permitting 50%complete
Stabilization D 94022 510 Stomnwater Esm't COT Environmental $140,000 $23,782 Bid 3/14
-Completion 6/14
CITY FACILITIES
-Confirmation of earlier testing complete
Permit Center/Police/City Hall D 91013 100 General N/A an LAS Architects $180,398 $48,610 4(1 Scoping for repair recommendations underway
Exterior Walls
ROW Project on hold due to much higher than anticipated
Future Campus Parking S 91016 100 General COT TBD $194,200 $0 I), P
Esm't R/W costs
City Hall Roof Repair Facilities Capital City of Tigard staff purchased the material and
t/ 91017 400 Projects N/A CO 100%
T COT $50,000 $28,864 100 completed the recoating of the roof in May 2013
C\ENG\CIP Power Point For Council\2013_Fourth_Quarter_Status Reportxls
Printed:8/6/2013 1025 AM ACTIVE PROJECTS Page 8 of 8
3
AIS-1368
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes
Agenda Title: Capital Improvement Program Project Prioritization
Prepared For: Carissa Collins
Submitted By: Carissa Collins,Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Staff is begining development of the city's Capital Improvement Program for FY 2015-19. Council has expressed a
desire to be involved in the CIP prioritization process.Staff will propose a process for Council involvement in the CIP
prioritazation and would like direction from council regarding the proposed process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff requests direction from Council regarding how they will participate in the prioritization process
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
During the last budget cycle,Council expressed a desire to be involved in the prioritization process for Capital
Improvement Plan(CIP).Council already has two times to make budgeting decisions on the CIP as members of the
Budget Committee and finally as Council in adopting the budget.
Prioritization is different than budgeting. It involves making a statement of what is important to the city,blind of
funding. Using the city's priorities,budgeting then attempts to match the available resources to the city's priorities.
Further,priorities are important when new funding sources are sought or become available that can be matched against
unfunded,high-priority projects.
Council involvement in the CIP prioritization process poses the following challenges:
1. Prioritization is a time consuming process.Last year,staff and citizen committees prioritized over sixty projects
during several hours of meetings.
2. Council time is limited and valuable.Two hours has been scheduled for the November workshop for Council
involvement in CIP prioritization. It will not be possible to describe all projects and have a robust discussion in
two hours.
3. When several parties are involved in the prioritization process,relative weights should be allocated to the rankings
of the parties.The current process gives equal weight to each party(staff and citizen advisory boards).
To meet these challenges,staff is recommending the following process:
1. Limit Council prioritization to the systems of highest interest. Council does not appear to have high interest in
sewer,stormwater,and water system projects (with the exception of LO/Tigard Water Partnership).To make the
best use of Council time,staff recommends Council prioritization of transportation,parks,and facility projects.
2. Prior to the November workshop,staff will provide a written summary of each project that is being considered
for prioritization.
3. During the workshop,staff will provide a brief presentation for each project.Staff will provide Council with a
blank" score-sheet" for council members to take notes.
4. After the workshop,each council member will take the score-sheet home to consider the projects and provide
their top 5 priority projects in each of the three systems: transportation,parks,and facilities.
5. The individual prioritizations will be collected and tallied to develop the overall priorities for City Council.These
will be presented to City Council in a Thursday Newsletter to provide an opportunity to comment and determine
if additional discussion is needed.
6. Staff is recommending that the Final priorities of City Council be weighted equally with the priorities of staff and
volunteer citizen advisory boards with each group having a 1/3rd weighting to the City's priorities. Ultimately,
Council has the final say in the CIP during the budgeting process.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Council can choose to have differing levels of involvement in the CIP prioritization process
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/.\
Attachments
No file(s)attached.
111
AIS-1347
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length(in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Briefing on a Request to Abandon Local Improvement District(LID)No. 1
Prepared For: Mike Stone Submitted By: Greer Gaston,Public Works
Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Does the council wish to formally consider abandonment of LID No. 1 at a future meeting?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the council:
•Elects not to abandon the LID.
•Directs LID No. 1 improvements be constructed as soon as practicable.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
A local improvement district(LID)is a process wherein private property owners access public financing for the
construction of defined public infrastructure which has or will be conditioned upon the development of their
properties. Improvements are typically financed by the city issuing bonds with 10-year payback period.
Planned improvements under LID No. 1 include the construction of roadway improvements (street,sidewalks etc.)
along portions of Dartmouth Street,68th Parkway and 69th Avenue in the Tigard Triangle.
LIDs are typically formed/abandoned on a partition basis with 66 2/3 percent of the property owners carrying the
affirmative.Voting percentages can be made based on area,size or front-footage as deemed appropriate and fair.
LID No. 1 was formed in 2008 to provide necessary and proportional infrastructure improvements to the district(see
attached map)due to the continuing and planned development within the Tigard Triangle. In fact,the need to complete
these improvements was deemed so necessary,that the LID was formed under the provisions of an emergency,
presumably meaning that they were to be completed as soon as possible.
Despite these efforts,the economy suddenly'turned,'and the anticipated development did not continue or materialize at
the anticipated speed.Although there was limited work completed in association with right-of-way acquisition,
meaningful work on completion of the design and associated construction drawings never materialized.Since that time
the LID remains in place with improvements yet to be constructed.
In the fall of 2012,staff was contacted by one of the LID participants,Jack Kearney,regarding the status of the LID.
Mr. Kearney owns the Dartmouth Townhomes properties.He said that despite the emergency under which the LID
was formed,no meaningful work was accomplished since its formation.Subsequently,staff sent a letter to the LID
participants of record inquiring about their support of the LID. Of the 18 properties involved,staff received written
responses from Mr. Kearney,Nadri/Salarie and Coon/Olsen(who are OUTSIDE the LID boundary) to abandon the
LID and one verbal response from Specht to keep it in place.Specht controls/owns 10 of the 18 parcels in the LID.
Staff notified Mr.Kearney that the majority of the LID property owners elected to have the LID remain in place.
Mr.Kearney continues to press for abandonment;this is the reason this issue has been brought before the council.
With the continued planning efforts currently underway and the upswing in development activities within the Tigard
Triangle,staff anticipates there will be significant increases in vehicular,bike and pedestrian activity in the planning area
as a result of development.
If the council elects to formally consider abandoning LID No. 1,staff will schedule a public hearing at an upcoming
council meeting.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable
COUNCIL GOALS,POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
The planned LID improvements are consistent with the provisions of the 2035 Transportation System Plan adopted by
the council in 2010.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
This is the first time abandonment of the LID has come before the council.
Attachments
Map of LID No. 1
l i
I
■
i I1 E.----7-
0 , i •ARTWORTH i ■ o /yy�rougallomas
L I I , - i LION BOUNDARY I - �_- �/P�
4LI - SW 70TH AVENUE _ --
_ , -� �T" �' --- -- wwaA1J , ,I l I KARRO ' � CAR fn
n I TL 1000 I I I �ONIMON WARM IIPECHT ROTH r' ( o •>•ECKr LAW I FAE•ar ;DI
•
� I nom .z , TL 2100 I�j �N
° I � , [_______ ,z
' r# k a 0' CAR< I Lii . n noe I:t JL, 1�I i i V dOiMlEd1 I �V•r i�' CrQ
l -- • 1----- _-J lrrnL_y%_i---------Irrn*i__.
_--- --- _ �___-- SW 69TH AVENUE-- _i__j__`_------
r-1
n•Roo oven ,„„:1 I8rccm.! srECHT i r
rrr"" may
mew '
SPEW/ 1 •7110.211/ i 1 �"1
\ n �0O I 1 n 8001 •ALDIYM s rw I O
J I
TL 3200 '
T SW 68TH PARKWAY ----_J L I--1
_ __ \ --------LID' BOUNDARY__-- ------_— i----
' ' 1 i 1
36=--- Z ?_ -
AIS-1358
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Briefing on an Intergovernmental Agreement to Provide Sewer Service to River
Terrace
Prepared For: Rob Murchison Submitted By: Kristie
Peerman,
Public
Works
Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council
Workshop
Mtg.
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Briefing on an intergovernmental agreement(IGA)with Clean Water Services(CWS)and the City of Beaverton
regarding the design and construction of a sewer project to serve River Terrace.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST
No formal action is requested;the council will be asked to formally consider the IGA on its consent agenda at an
upcoming meeting.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Washington County plans to reconstruct and widen the section of Scholls Ferry Road from Roy Rogers Road to the
Walnut Street/Murray Road intersection.
CWS,the City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard need to install approximately 2,000 feet of sewer line under a section
of Scholls Ferry Road from Roy Rogers Road to Barrows Road.This sewer project will eventually become part of the
system that will provide sewer service to River Terrace and to South Cooper Mountain.
Washington County's project area for roadwork overlaps the project area for the sewer line.
The attached IGA—between CWS,Beaverton and Tigard-outlines each parties'responsibilities as follows:
•CWS will pay the county to construct the sewer line. (CWS has a separate agreement with Washington County to
construct the project.)
•The City of Beaverton will design the project and manage construction.
•The Cities of Beaverton and Tigard will reimburse CWS for their portion of the construction and design costs.
The IGA is in draft form;it is currently being reviewed by each parties'legal counsel.
The council will be asked to formally consider the IGA on its consent agenda at an upcoming meeting.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The council could choose to:
1. Not enter into the IGA and could construct the sewer line at a later date.
2. Direct staff to pursue some other course of action.
3. Direct staff to re-negotiate the IGA to pursue a different allocation of project responsibilities and/or funding.
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES,MASTER PLANS
Not applicable
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
This is the first time this agreement has come before council.
Fiscal Impact
Cost: 420,000
Budgeted(yes or no): Yes
Where Budgeted (department/program): 500-Sanitary Sewer
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The estimated cost of sewer line construction and outside administrative services—as outlined in the IGA is
$358,000. In addition,up to$62,000 will be needed to cover city staffing costs (project manager,inspector,etc.). The
FY 2014 Budget includes the Dartmouth Street Sewer Repair which is complete and has $420,000 of unspent
appropriations. The remaining appropriations from Dartmouth Street will be used for the IGA to provide sewer
service to River Terrace. By moving the appropriations from Dartmouth Street project to the River Terrace project,
no additional resources will be necessary to fund the IGA to provide sewer service to River Terrace.
•
Attachments
Draft IGA
•
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 'itt
BETWEEN CITY OF BEAVERTON,CITY OF TIGARD AND
CLEAN WATER SERVICES TO CONSTRUCT PHASE 1 OF
THE SCHOLLS FERRY TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION
This Agreement,dated , 2013, is between CLEAN WATER
SERVICES(District), a county service district organized under ORS Chapter 451,the CITY OF
BEAVERTON (Beaverton), an Oregon Municipality, and the CITY OF TIGARD(Tigard), an
Oregon Municipality.
A. RECITALS
ORS 190.003 - 190.110 encourages intergovernmental cooperation and authorizes local
governments to delegate to each other authority to perform their respective functions as
necessary.
District, Tigard, and Beaverton intend to undertake the Scholls Ferry Trunk Sewer
Extension Project(Project)to extend gravity sewer from Barrows Road westward along Scholls
Ferry Road to the intersection of Roy Rogers Road. This Project has been endorsed by the
Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Committee. The Project will be constructed in three
phases. This Intergovernmental Agreement covers Phase 1 only. Subsequent phases will be
documented under separate Intergovernmental Agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Phase 1 sanitary sewer improvement consists of constructing approximately 1,792
linear feet of 21-inch diameter sanitary sewer, 565 linear feet of small diameter sanitary sewer
(8-inch to 12-inch), 17 manholes and appurtenances on Scholls Ferry Road from Roy Rogers
Road to a point 610 feet west of the west curbline of the Barrows Road Roundabout (Phase 1).
Beaverton will design Phase 1. Phase 1 will be constructed by a contractor selected by
Washington County LUT(County)to widen Scholls Ferry Road. The County will administer
the construction of Phase 1 as part of its Scholls Ferry widening Project from SW Roy Rogers
Road to SW Teal Boulevard(Road Project). See Exhibit A attached hereto for the Phase 1
location.
C. DEFINITIONS
1. Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Committee—This Committee has been
established by District and the Member Cities of Beaverton,Cornelius, Forest Grove,
Hillsboro,Tigard,Tualatin, and Sherwood.
2. Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and Design Cost—Beaverton labor and benefit costs and
consultant costs paid by Beaverton associated with services outlined in Section E.1-6.
3. Phase 1 21-inch Sewer Cost— 100%of the construction and non-construction costs for
the 21-inch sewer main,appurtenances,and manholes on the 21-inch mainline for Phase
Page 1 —Intergovernmental Agreement
1 paid by District to County pursuant to the Intergovernmental Agreement between
District and County dated ,2013 (County IGA) and covers County's cost
for construction and non-construction services such as survey,Phase 1 construction
management and administrative costs.
4. Beaverton Phase 1 Sewer Cost—construction and non-construction costs for any 6-inch
to 12-inch sewer mains,laterals, appurtenances, and manholes extending northward from
the 21-inch sewer main and all manhole adjustments for Phase 1 paid by District to
County pursuant to the County IGA.
5. Tigard Phase 1 Sewer Cost-construction and non-construction costs for any 6-inch to
12-inch sewer mains, laterals, appurtenances, and manholes extending southward from
the 21-inch sewer main paid by District to County pursuant to the County IGA in Phase
1.
D. DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS
District shall:
1. Provide direction to Beaverton regarding the size of the sewer trunkline and the location
of the west terminus for future connection.
2. Review the plans and specifications provided by Beaverton for Phase 1 and provide
comments to Beaverton within ten working days of receiving them.
3. Enter into a separate Intergovernmental Agreement with County to administer
construction of the Phase 1 improvements.
4. Pay County for construction and non-construction costs as required in the County IGA.
5. Have the right to approve or reject a Beaverton employee selected to serve as District's
Project Manager for Phase 1.
6. Have the right to review, approve or reject any proposed design change or Extra Work as
defined in the County IGA, or other change to Phase 1.
7. Have the right to provide a list of items to be completed prior to final acceptance of Phase
1.
8. Invoice Beaverton for 16.3%of the Phase 1 21-inch Sewer Cost and 100%of the
Beaverton Phase 1 Sewer Cost less 67.4%of the Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and Design
Cost upon completion of Phase 1.
9. Invoice Tigard for 16.3%of the Phase 1 21-inch Sewer Cost and 100%of the Tigard
Sewer Cost for Phase 1 upon completion of Phase 1.
10. Provide written evidence to Beaverton and Tigard that funds are allocated for the
District's share of Phase 1 before construction begins.
Page 2—Intergovernmental Agreement
E. BEAVERTON OBLIGATIONS
Beaverton shall:
1. Select,contract with and pay consultants to perform a geotechnical investigation,utility
locates and environmental assessment for use in designing and obtaining permits for
Phase 1. The design plans shall use the County Roadway Survey and design plans as the
base document.
2. Provide all planning,design, specifications,permits and inspection for Phase 1.
3. Provide timely reviews and comments on County design documents and timely response
to other Phase 1 information requests.
4. Provide Tigard and District at least ten days to review plans and specifications for Phase
1 at 70% and 90%completion, and incorporate review comments into the plans.
5. Provide technical consultation to County during construction as needed.
6. Appoint a Beaverton employee acceptable to District to serve as the District's project
manager for Phase 1 and coordinate with County during construction.
7. Obtain District's consent before taking any of the following actions for Phase 1: a)
authorizing any design changes, b)approving any change orders, c) authorizing use of
contingency line items, or d)resolving any disagreement,dispute,delay or claim.
8. Provide District and Tigard documents that establish the Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and
Design Cost.
9. Provide timely responses to bidders' questions about Phase 1. If necessary, provide
District and County with an addendum no later than five business days prior to the bid
opening for Phase 1.
10. Provide construction inspection of Phase 1 bid items including review and approval of
shop drawings, submittals, and onsite inspection to determine compliance with the
contract documents. Coordinate onsite inspections of Phase 1 bid items through
County's lead inspector. Beaverton's inspector shall be onsite and responsible for
enforcing all applicable specifications during all Phase 1 work, including but not limited
to night work,accommodations for public traffic and work zone traffic control in
coordination with the County's lead inspector. Beaverton shall provide Phase 1 daily
reports,erosion reports, field directives,pay notes and quantities to County in a timely
manner in County-provided format and coordinate with the County's lead inspector.
11. Provide District written notice that Phase 1 is complete and obtain District's approval for
final acceptance of Phase 1 prior to making recommendations to County regarding
releasing bonds, or issuing final payment to the contractor.
12. Provide District as-built construction drawings for Phase 1 within 60 days after the Road
Project is deemed complete and acceptable to District. The as-built drawings shall be
provided in camera-ready hardcopy, 11 x 17 inches with a CD in both pdf and AutoCAD
digital format.
13. Coordinate and participate with District on any disagreements,disputes,delays or claims
related to or as a result of Phase 1.
Page 3— Intergovernmental Agreement
14. Pay District 16.3%of the Phase 1 21-inch Sewer Cost and 100%of the Beaverton Phase
1 Sewer Cost less 67.4%of the Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and Design Cost,not to
exceed $325,000 for Beaverton's portion of Phase 1 as defined in this Agreement, within
30 days of approving the invoice. The invoice shall include full progress payment
amounts, including typical construction retainage.
15. Invoice Tigard for 16.3%of the Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and Design Cost upon
completion of Phase 1 of the Project.
16. Provide written evidence to District and Tigard that funds are allocated for Beaverton's
share of Phase 1 before construction begins.
17. Inform the Phase 1 construction contractor in writing of District's right to withhold final
acceptance.
F. TIGARD OBLIGATIONS
Tigard shall:
1. Review the plans and specifications provided by Beaverton for Phase 1 and provide
comments to Beaverton within ten working days of receiving them.
2. Pay District, 16.3%of the Phase 1 21-inch Sewer Cost and 100%of the Tigard Sewer
Cost for Phase 1 as defined in this Agreement,not to exceed$325,000,within 30 days of
approving the invoice. The invoice shall include full progress payment amounts,
including typical construction retainage.
3. Pay Beaverton, 16.3%of the Beaverton Phase 1 Planning and Design Cost,not to exceed
$32,600 for Tigard's portion of Phase 1 as defined in this Agreement,within 30 days of
approving the invoice.
4. Provide written evidence to District and Beaverton that funds are allocated for Tigard's
share of Phase 1 before construction begins.
G. GENERAL TERMS
1. Laws and Regulations. Beaverton,Tigard and District agree to abide by all applicable
laws and regulations including their own purchasing rules.
2. Term of this Agreement. This Agreement is effective from the date the last party signs it
and shall remain in effect until Phase 1 of the Project is complete and the parties'
obligations have been fully performed or this Agreement is terminated as provided
herein.
3. Amendment of Agreement. Beaverton,Tigard and District may amend this Agreement
from time to time,by mutual written agreement.
A. Proposed changes of scope during the Project implementation must be reviewed
and endorsed by the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Committee.
Changes necessitated by conditions discovered during design or construction,but
Page 4—Intergovernmental Agreement
consistent with the original scope of Phase I of the Project,must be approved by
District.
B. During the duration of the Washington County construction contract, all parties to
this Agreement will act reasonably and cooperatively to make decisions in a timely
fashion to avoid contract change orders/delay claims and added County
Administrative charges.
4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated immediately by mutual written
agreement of the parties, or by any of the parties notifying the others in writing prior to
award of a construction contract,with the termination being effective in 30 days.
5. Integration. This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties on the
subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous written or oral
understandings, representations or communications of every kind on the subject. No
course of dealing between the parties and no usage of trade shall be relevant to
supplement any term used in this Agreement. Acceptance or acquiescence in a course of
performance rendered under this Agreement shall not be relevant to determine the
meaning of this Agreement and no waiver by a party of any right under this Agreement
shall prejudice the waiving party's exercise of the right in the future.
6. Indemnification. Within the limits of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, codified at ORS
30.260 through 30.300, each of the parties shall indemnify and defend the others and
their officers, employees, agents, and representatives from and against all claims,
demands,penalties, and causes of action of any kind or character relating to or arising
from this Agreement(including the cost of defense thereof,including attorney fees) in
favor of any person on account of personal injury, death,damage to property,or violation
of law,which arises out of,or results from,the negligent or other legally culpable acts or
omissions of the indemnitor, its employees, agents,contractors or representatives.
7. Resolution of Disputes. If any dispute out of this Agreement cannot be resolved by the
project managers from each party,the Beaverton Mayor,Tigard City Manager and
District's General Manager will attempt to resolve the issue. If the Beaverton and Tigard
Mayors and District's General Manager are not able to resolve the dispute,the parties
will submit the matter to mediation, each party paying its own costs and sharing equally
in common costs. In the event the dispute is not resolved in mediation,the parties will
submit the matter to arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be fmal,binding and
conclusive upon the parties and subject to appeal only as otherwise provided in Oregon
law.
8. Interpretation of Agreement.
A. This Agreement shall not be construed for or against any party by reason of the
authorship or alleged authorship of any provision.
B. The paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for ease of reference
only and shall not be used in construing or interpreting this Agreement.
Page 5—Intergovernmental Agreement
9. Severability/Survival. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held
illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not
be impaired. All provisions concerning the limitation of liability, indemnity and conflicts
of interest shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any cause.
10. Approval Required. This Agreement and all amendments,modifications or waivers of
any portion thereof shall not be effective until approved by 1)District's General Manager
or the General Manager's designee and when required by applicable District rules,
District's Board of Directors 2)Beaverton, and 3)Tigard. Proposed changes of scope
must also be approved by the Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Committee.
11. Choice of LawNenue. This Agreement and all rights, obligations and disputes arising
out of the Agreement shall be governed by Oregon law. All disputes and litigation
arising out of this Agreement shall be decided by the state courts in Oregon. Venue for
all disputes and litigation shall be in Washington County, Oregon.
CLEAN WATER SERVICES CITY OF BEAVERTON,OREGON
By: By:
General Manager or Designee Mayor or Designee
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
District Counsel City Counsel
CITY OF TIGARD
By:
City Manager or Designee
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Counsel
Page 6—Intergovernmental Agreement
Exhibit A
Project Location Map
EXHIBIT A
SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
PHASE 1
SW ROY ROGERS RD
PHASE 1
-
O
PHASE 2 \ 7
Page 7—Exhibit A—Project Location Map
Intergovernmental Agreement
6
AIS-1408
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length(in minutes): 25 Minutes
Agenda Title: Discuss Topics for Upcoming Community Survey
Prepared For: Liz Newton Submitted By: Liz Newton,City Management
Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Are there topics or subject matters council would like citizen feedback on as part of the upcoming biennual citizen
survey?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUEST
Provide direction to staff on topics/issues that council members would like to include in the upcoming citizen survey.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
For the last several years,the city has commissioned a citizen suvey to be conducted in the fall of odd numbered years.
Funds were budgeted for the current fiscal year to conduct a survey this fall.
The survey is designed to gauge citizens'views on current issues and city services.Prior to engaging a consultant to
develop the questions and design the survey instrument,staff asks for council direction on topics and issues to include.
City council discussed ideas for gathering community input at the meeeting on January 10,2013. Minutes of that
portion of the meeting are attached along with a one-page summary titled,Council thoughts on Community
Engagement,and notes from council's goal setting last January.The executive staff brainstormed possible topics for the
upcoming survey last week and their list is also attached.
Staff will work with the consulant to develop questions on the topics and issues that council reaches consensus on.
Council will be provided a copy of the survey before it is administered.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS,POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
None
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
No discussions have been held on possible topics/issues for the upcoming survey.
Attachments
11013 council minutes
Council Thoughts on Community Engagement
Today's Strengths Future Wishes
Executive Staff Brainstorming for Citizen Survey
City Manager Wine noted some key activities scheduled for the Council in the near future
with regard to the River Terrace Community Plan.One activity has to do with the
annexation of two areas.The other activity is the convening of the key stakeholder working
group for which Councilor Woodard volunteered to be the Council representative. Ms.\Vine
said at the staff level,the tasks relating to updating the Master Plan and securing the
consultant for a transportation plan update are underway. She said if more reporting is
needed on these types of activities,staff can give more updates. In response to a comment
from Councilor Buehner,City Manager Wine requested that when people inquire about the
status of the River Terrace Community Plan project,they be referred to the project manager,
Darren Wyss or to herself. She advised of the communication plan for people interested in
this project,which includes sending out Ietters and maintaining a listserv. She spoke to the
importance of maintaining a coordinated communication effort.
Councilor Snider said he heard that Councilor Buchner would like to see more detail on a
six-month activities plan for the River Terrace Community Plan.
Council meeting recessed for a few minutes.
Gathering Community Input
Consultant I lertzberg opened the discussion on gathering community input.
Councilor Woodard noted the Council hears from many of the same people much of the
time and it Council is only hearing from a fraction of the community. He participated in the
National Night Out event and said he found this to be an opportunity to talk to a different
crowd of people. He said that when he talks to people in the community, he often finds
there is a basic lack of understanding on community issues and noted the need for building
awareness. Councilor Buchner noted her past success of walking the neighborhoods and
spending time talking to residents about issues.
Councilor Woodard offered that perhaps the Neighborhood Networks could offer a local
government seminar. Councilor Snider served on Financing Strategies Task Force where the
notion of the community list of wants have a price tag and there is a need to find out how
much people are willing to pay for their requests for sen-ices. One idea suggested was to
place a cafeteria plan on the ballot or a town hall where you allow"one-resident,one-vote"
and whoever comes to vote will get to participate in selecting the top funding priorities for
the city (over and above basic services).
Councilor Buehner talked about a statistically valid survey conducted and noted the outcome
on recreation issues. Councilor Woodard again referred to the Neighborhood Networks and
how we could use this structure more effectively.Councilor Snider referred to the City of
Newport Oregon's practice of dividing the community up into districts and holding
meetings within these areas to find out the priorities of the people who live and work in each
of the areas.
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES—JANUARY 10,2013
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd..Tigard.OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 13 of 14
Discussion on community engagement was held. An outline of the high points of the
discussion is attached (Attachment 2).
Meeting adjourned at 4:46 p.m.
(ird-Ag,Catherine Wheatley,City Recor er
Attest:
„(42Q
Mayo , _its•of Tigard
Date: 2/Sr/a�1�
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES—JANUARY 10, 2013
City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd..Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 14 of 14
Attachment 2—January 10,2013
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Thoughts on Community Engagement
What are our purposes in engaging the community?
• The city needs public input to make good decisions
• We want to widen the circle of involvement beyond those people we hear from regularly
• It is important to build awareness of city issues and options for the future
What tools and methodologies should we consider?
• Town Halls
+ Citywide
+ Neighborhoods
+ Elders
• Use existing community networks whenever possible
• Reach out to people where they are:school open houses,football and soccer games,farmers
markets,bingo,homeowner associations,Library,etc.
• Engage people in one-on-one conversations;recruit active citizens to engage with others
• Use a variety of tools to gauge public opinion
+ People-meters at meetings
+ Statistically-valid surveys
+ Advisory votes,perhaps offering cafeteria options
+ New England town meetings
• Neighborhood Network
• Neighborhood blogs
• Use strategic planning process as an opportunity
Attachment 1—January 10,2013
Council Meeting Minutes
Today's Strengths
• Geographic location/easy access.
• Committed staff and City Council: best for the city.
• Parks and natural resources.
• Fiscally responsible.
• Education.
• Volunteer involvement.
• Strong feeling of community.
• Stable population/workforce skilled.
• Transportation network.
Future Wishes—25 years
• Connection(between areas of Tigard)
• Two hearts.
• Between Triangle and Downtown.
• Light rail/bus service.
• Ten minute maximum travel/2-3 modes.
• Washington County with equal treatment for bus/light rail service—trolley/local bus
services.
• Parks and Recreation.
• District.
• Schools serve as centers.
• Stadium (multi-sport) —amateur complex,arena.
• Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District model.
• Recreation center(YMCA).
• Zip lining as destination.
• Neighborhoods:
• Sustainable
• Live,work,play within twenty minutes walking distance.
• Universal design (built for any age).
• Vibrant communities.
• Downtown (Examples: Redding,Ashland).
• Urban,walkable,live,work,shop,play there.
• Gathering place/common area.
• Vibrant, evocative/want to go back there.
• Convention center and amphitheater.
• Revamped property tax system.
• Stable,secure funding.
• Own Zip Code.
• Long-term water supply.
• Willamette. (Tigard has water rights on the Willamette)
• Owner.
• Reuse (purple pipe). (Use for irrigation and to migrate into Fanno Creek)
• Annexation.
• All area with in Urban Planning Area.
• Which directions to grow(new areas beyond).
• Economy-robust!
• More employment land.
• Strong employment.
• All who live here can work here.
• Retail and high tech/complementary.
Executive Staff Brainstorming for 2013 Citizen Survey—August 6,2013
Communications—two way,sources, how,what,who
Understand citizen priorities—broad subjects, current service levels, how would you spend next
public dollar, If yes,what? New services?What?
High capacity transit—SW Corridor
LOT water partnership—how are people feeling?
Recreation—are people willing to pay?
Maintaining park lands
Paying for better facilities
Code enforcement
River Terrace—how does it develop,what do we want to see?
Public engagement—have you been involved?In what?
Tell us the important Council issue for next year
Downtown Tigard—have you been downtown? Has it improved?
Public support for development of River Terrace—prioritization of different development
opportunities
Better understanding of community support for parks, active transportation,trails, etc.
Four-day work week, Library closure?
Walkability of neighborhoods
Make sure we ask questions that we want the answers to
Strategic plan/nexus/test
r
7
AIS-1404
Workshop Meeting
Meeting Date: 08/20/2013
Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes
Agenda Title: CCDA Business Meeting
Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development
Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: City Center
Development
Agency
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Consider a resolution awarding a Targeted Improvement Program matching grant to Jeffrey Allen Home Decor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the City Center Development Agency Board approve the resolution awarding a Targeted
Improvement Program matching grant for$75,000 to Jeffrey Allen Home Decor for tenant improvements in the 12460
SW Main Street building as recommended by the Urban Renewal Improvement Projects Joint Committee.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The CCDA approved the Targeted Improvement Program on August 21,2012.The program offers a 50 percent
matching grant(up to$75,000) to help offset the costs of interior tenant improvements for targeted businesses. On
March 5,2013 the CCDA made its first award to Symposium Cafe.
Jeffery Allen Home Decor(a business that has been in continuous operation since 2002)purchased 12460 SW Main
Street in May 2012.The building had previously been vacant and on the market for approximately two years.Jeffrey
Allen's intention was to renovate the building over several months and relocate their business in early 2014 when their
lease ran out at their present location at 7925 SW Dartmouth Street.To date the owners have demolished the interior
of the building and applied for and received building permits for the proposed tenant improvements.
Representatives of Jeffrey Allen expressed interest in the Targeted Improvement Program and submitted application
materials.Jeffrey Allen estimates the cost of their interior and exterior improvements to be$330,000.Among the
proposed improvements eligible for the Targeted Improvement Program matching grant are,architectural skylights;
new electrical,plumbing,and HVAC;flooring;sheetrock;and creation of a new mezzanine level.Among the additional
planned improvements are new windows,doors,awnings,signage,and lighting(eligible for a Facade Improvement
Matching grant) as well as a rear display area(along Bumham)that includes a decorative iron fence,retaining wall,
pavers,and a storage building.
On July 16 a representative of Jeffrey Allen met with the Urban Renewal Improvement Projects Joint Committee (made
up of two members each of the Board of the City Center Development Agency and the City Center Advisory
Commission). Staff and committee members commented that Jeffrey Allen was a unique small business with a strong
commitment to good urban design and an ability to attract new types of customers and visitors to Downtown.The
business could help"re-brand"Downtown Tigard.
The Joint Committee met again on July 30 to consider the application materials.The Joint Committee rated the
I
proposal on three evaluation criteria:
1.The proposed business owner/manager's proven track record of success.
2.The potential of the proposed business to significantly enhance Downtown Tigard.
3.Proposed project's financial terms.
The proposal received high marks from the Joint Committee,scoring an average of 94/100 points.The committee
judged the owners'experience and business plan to be strong,and recognized the matching grants (Targeted
Improvement and Façade Improvement)will leverage more than three times the grant amounts in private investment.
The program guidelines call for the Joint Committee to make a recommendation on a matching grant to the Board of
the CCDA for their consideration.A resolution approving the matching grant request is attached.The terms of the
grant and conditions will be outlined in the Agency's Letter of Commitment,and grant funds will not be disbursed until
the project is completed and inspected by Agency staff.
A copy of the applicant's full application(including business financial information)will be provided to CCDA board
members in a separate envelope marked"confidential."
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Board of the CCDA could choose to not make an award.
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES,MASTER PLANS
Council 2012 Goal#3b Downtown
Contact owners of key,structurally sound Main Street buildings with vacancies.Begin cooperative effort to secure
tenants that will contribute to the vitality of downtown.
City Center Urban Renewal Plan
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
March 5,2013 (CCDA awards TIP grant to Symposium Cafe)
Fiscal Impact
Cost: 75,000
Budgeted(yes or no): yes
Where Budgeted(department/program):CCDA
Additional Fiscal Notes:
$75,000 included in the FY 2013-14 CCDA Budget for the Targeted Improvement Program
Attachments
CCDA Resolution
TIP Application
•
V
City of Tigard
C
is COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,T1GARc Targeted Improvement Program Application
The City of Tigard/City Center Development Agency(CCDA)reserves the right to
approve or reject any application for funding at its sole discretion.
Project address: V A cc SvD VI f& C't -
Proposed business name: ` tEi J < A LL€t
Business type: NiS�,tiG:-. \11`'C esC mc- ct-s..1s- '_i `' ' t,1-1�� Cl v:VO4-*f....
Applicant: ❑ Property owner Business owner ❑ Other
Property owner(s):
Phone: Email:
Mailing address:
City: State: Zip:
Business owner(s): f"VeAk ‘ , i,.�J (
Phone: . � 9( 1 ) Email:,jg C�x oU,1\1/4Y
Creak%cr.Cit.:►4.-
Mailing address: -1Z9 d'%vim IS,c14- PbS
City: \icits c� State: Zip: 977-7-:
Square footage of the property: -Apoic .
Describe the proposed scope of improvements: •1, 't,.k\e!r%sue' re-R .A A. Acs
-1j441e""- 01-1 -14\PA-1-- -It-- kl:i-i... ._,‘-Ukk-111:NY-yi=;.., \ __'&k-C.:&-IVAA-
(add an additional page if necerrary)
Page 1 y"3
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.ngard-or.gov
City of Tigard
ill
II i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
>« Targeted Improvement Program Application
What is your anticipated budget? $ `L�pac)
What is the amount of your grant funding request? $ 1 S t&
Describe how the proposed project is consistent with Downtown Tigard revitalization goals
as defined in Sectiop 2 of the Request for Proposals.
(Pe-_a'sg=e-__CiSAKA2 -010N-al .-1S y'rl:!:-terbk._. 5JS Ag.f*5__ I-Mk wA.V. Artf,,
_ _‘::,e...g._? ts.ro.,:c_t _e..Ns-_-_th.19,.V.:1
___tr- x_k_Q_e..><_lrgatr-_l_,e...‘W:...e.F___Ad,g.„__4K7e..r_-_s ..I.e.._'±W_k-_12... i . ?_ _".:_1:1.e..-12\C:1
(add anWditiana/page if ne.er' sag) ,a ` r v f,.,��i%IT\
Estimated number of permanent jobs to be created and estimated wages: -4 s---- f 1(E'1t;
Proposed hours of operation: tkl.),1%17.\-*•--6 — C-30,..\-040-6 ,0 0..V41/4- `" L VA.)--.
Additional Material Checklist:
1. Photographs of the unimproved space.
2. Scale drawings of proposed improvements (do not have to be architectural drawings at this stage).
3. Business prospectus that includes:
i. A business plan summary; projected sales including products or services to be offered; branding
concept; target customer profile; expenditure per customer; length of visit per customer ; and a
description of how proposed business distinguishes itself from the competition.
ii. Business startup requirements.
iii. List of financial assets,funding sources and uses,financial pro forma with 10-year operating projections.
iv. Resumes of business owners and/or operators.
4. Statement of past business experience of owners and/or operators that includes:
i.Resumes of business owners and/or operators
U. For the business(es) that the owner and/or operator has owned and/or operated in the past three
years,include:
a. Profit and loss statements for the past three years
b.Summary of any litigation in which the business or its owners and/or operators (named in
their capacity as owner/operator) has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit at any time on or
after January 1,2010,including the name(s) of the plaintiff(s), the court where the action was
filed,the case number, the nature of the case and the current status of the action.
Pay 2 of 3
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov
City of Tigard
•
_
III .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TIGARD Targeted Improvement Program Application
c. If the business experience is related to food/beverage service, provide a summary of any
adverse action taken against the business, or penalty or fine imposed on the business, by any
county health department or the O.L.C.C. on or after January 1, 2010, including the nature
of the action, a summary of the allegations giving rise to the action and a summary of the
outcome of the action,including the amount of any penalty or fine.
5. Copy of Letter of Intent to Lease or Option to Purchase Agreement.
NOTE: All information submitted by proposers shall be public records and subject to disclosure pursuant to the
Oregon Public Records Act(ORS 192.410 et seq.),except such portions for which proposer requests exception from
disclosure consistent with Oregon law.Any portion of a submittal(such as the business prospectus)that the proposer
claims constitutes a "trade secret" or is "confidential" must meet the requirements of ORS 192.501(2) and ORS
192.502(4). Applicant must dearly identify such material, by marking it"CONFIDENTIAL," and provide separate
notice in writing of the status of this material to the official contact.
Property Owner Participation
THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED
ABOVE AND THAT THEY ARE V ILLING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE TARGETED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
❑ N/A (Mark N/A f property owner is the applicant)
Printed name of property owner: ,7 2A ' -' "
Signature: 4"ti--r Date: 7/2"V/3
Certification by Applicant:
THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT We...INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
Printed name of ap. ican): �- '4 1 ` f IF 4111
Signature: Al( . A//.X�— Date: "T 2-.'. 2s*-S
Peg 3 of 3
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov
3. Business Prospectus
i.Business Plan Summary
Jeffrey Allen LLC(dba Jeffrey Allen Home and Garden)has been in continuous operation since 2002
providing home decor furniture,accessories,plants and orchids as well as design services to the community.
We have been leassing space in the Tigard Triangle Shopping Center since August of 2004. We are very
pleased to have the opportunity to purchase the space on main street to provide us with a permanent home.
Projected Sales
Products and Services to be offered
• Asian furniture and accessories.antique Buddhist statuary, indoor and outdoor pottery,unique plants
and orchids.
Branding Concept
• Our logo is a lotus blossom floating on an asian fan. It is featured on our business card,price tags and
website.
Target Customer profile
• Homeowners in the Tigard,Lake Oswego,SW Portland and greater Portland metro area
Average expenditure per customer
• Varies greatly depending on products and services required. Some customers purchase smaller items
such as orchids and accent pieces($100 or less). Others make major purchase to update there entire
homes and businesses($5000 or more).
Length of visit
• Typically one hour or less
Distinguishing ourselves from the competition
• Jeffrey Allen is truly a one of a kind shopping destination. Many Items sold in our store cannot be
found anywhere else. We provide a relaxed yet sophisticated gallery atmosphere.
Ii. Business Startup Requirements
• We are currently in operation so requirements would be minimal. Some local adevertising and Grand
Opening signage for the new location.
Iii. List of Financial Assets
• One company vehicle(Honda Odyssey)
• 3 computers and 2 flat screen televisions for display of completed projects
Iv. Resume of Business Owner
• Allen Luong has a masters degree from Oregon State University. He has previously worked in
education for Portland Public Schools and has been a small business owner in the Portland area for
more than 13 years.
4. Statement of past business experience
• Jeffrey Allen LLC began as a home based design and installation business in 1998. The first store front
location was in Northwest Portland which was maintained from 2002 until 2004. We expanded to a
space more than four times larger which allowed us to showcase a much larger inventory of both
interior and exterior items.
a.Profit and loss statements
• See attached tax documents
b. Summary of any litigation
None
c.Food and beverage experience
Not applicable
INTERIOR REMODELING
1 . General Construction $62,000
Footing
Framing
Sheetrock
2. HVAC—Mechanical 28,000
3. Architectural skylight 22,000
4. Electrical 20,000
Lighting
Track lights
Security
5. Plumbing 10,000
Appliances
Fixtures
6. Flooring 13,000
7. Store Fixtures 20,000
TOTAL $175,000
EXTERIOR REMODELING
1. Excavation $20,000
Retaining wall
Iron fence
2. Exterior Awnings 55,000
Main St.
Burnham
3. Exterior Window 20,000
4. Signage 15,000
Lighting
Signs
5. Storage 25,000
6. Outdoor Pottery & Plants 10,000
7. Pavers 10,000
TOTAL $155,000
,�,��,j �r
rE- h1Xr1 IAi • on,rit'
1F�1.IA11-( I .1Ef-FR•tYALIE�I CGar,E of .W0� : -�_ - «..�y�. .
OWWEi� NoM�o RECEIVED ". '. � , . ; , , � `
Trss�mid GARrMOU'jN`•'T NON 01414E-F- putt-042i n' : 540PE. Wt411n6 uP
p02-11.4.1.1p OR`t'122� 4.p�U1LGyU'(es*-me tHs�t R 6 36L0 4 114
OR 1 5 2�+) ri. 4Y
GIF.tiIEI � 1/IE( Af�I -fH�AODr11011 OF-A 2./F HeZzA•Nt4G FoR
CRY "u _—I ! I 4TRG•�;) *I
N OFFIGti, KEE'r AREA. 1 LACE-4.-4441 IA41 -RE- �.�w>tian��:��.�' J
(1�N(RA�To); izco N IGoTM R✓E. phut. , eI EaNl rtc, op �s PROVL1�1 for-
WILDING
F (I• +10 OR(1/7230 461.0. uEW Ra ROOM'.,AND:A+IA4L KftNE1J ,J pt 101 Or ✓X41- r
'14L;rio37x.,ep si A7Gtp 'r0 HA! F410R• ACC.-E-•:4 10 ROOF VIA I • I u
cca IBi.l3q W W/lt) Rt»F hDr(LH. u+" !14;d •M
$' --+
w DOWN �fAIR
ARC+11-r�T vov6tga.rl Ir Ec Es° :.�«vim �u.��
11 rt °T y ,
ut-liolasA�lo 5J1� 3 GErE Rib e.,u�MITt4.i4 r , ;
poxiLA4 o2 9/7209 I 1 b g -.
fs r 1 3 2w Bi2' lu GErr I ` 1� /
u4.1K ?so8 r-lt "(R1GAL PE4.w►J tPAL Pr, oo r I I / � �f7 /
MGHQN1GA'v<�1%-rtIt , phnE I `_
h(Rurr J FA L,'F S RICRM�tI ErJGIFI I
pi��Aw szH� , tu1R+T{ ( 1--1 _._.-+ ' „; r 4` / ^,
T �4 AWNING m4441.4 A RMI�E� 1'
151 11i 5MJ P{tp/D SPw N K 1,E R-F'u4#44., El F REQI D) A ? rr t� i i ` 1,1 /'� `I i1 m
FbIL ..I•Ir7 OO�TLL`I?22 r N r:K .oel ,, ,'i J i_-f_'.
7x.: 03 Rioesne, poei.- r.:44-1 L LE. 5 - - T , S w
_ r
r • I, o.)F?I t* MI/kAROkAR- 9rL. .-,..a..�.: Kr:w.ia. 'c9�iii�--," ... -_.
a41-1FrAI441/ M-/f. r -?!
CoNE�f, 1( e• v-ID ' (:)C1cTtle io WA LT-
PRO.J EG-C71 r Ci/p.4c:4ef i t/F. 75f �r�r�n n,� V- '1 I
FL.r(, A/AII.Ap i.e- 2 F=$Leu 0-1P✓C 3 I ! i f'� 7 1 rx! 2M ! I �lI+L
Ez,rte.., uc.yTit4e. . Pu1oR.o14 tafttY 1 /
Louu�-f-rr>av�r11 , ' FED'( I/'1-" 01
P>t.1 >z IJ I—I A M �-r
0e -1LY 1.0,4 D
D W A E K 1 H1 - 606r -11
�14I-o� fftf G F = 4 -`-F = t7 r7 ('F-4r•6`
b- IGO`-F/G1culYnrtr P
. _ B««xt La a,/F-- 628=F - E R�r
v 1-.)t44 t -- ---
+ I z t ft n�cK-IP f, I-X nle EyrL J r _� —
- • - .I 4.1011 i1 i .6'F i I ��
• �I�r 1_ . 2/F U G . r 1r..)44.1014 s' r ". a 11.......
,
\ 1 I
1 I W I
I L — _— 4.
a 1 ' L. 31.1 t... y m. ` �
�
1- �I. RZ ,$ ),- w L
` v nt T
) , , I I > ' 1 Wt/A. 2 i,, �_ .• - tti .w. -, 1 r.,_ - :I,"7, r _ 1 i , ,i'. „7-- 1e. V 1 _ 1MA LI ,I .�.1 \}:,!�-n _I�sv nc I
1 NI I v� 1 i Kris s:N Adis- v, /r � �Fs 2 a i° :
i y0 +- A"�Y7]. n —‘- -E- --•'` -E- t I a tie CI rvor.NNE a.�w�...�� � _}L r 1 Q LL 'r iliii
Lam_ - --
-_,I tia
u
ail �° ; ��,,,� V I L 1 `-1 'TY MA N
- " Ho 6tlA Le.
-
(?is �,., ` ' RB/I_W 3-25-S rActe I `FFT-I Rea gyp► t.
— -
ir--4 11
.....____..._._4. __
r_t1 . 11
. •-....k, I — I
1 ,
1
1
. ■
'
I& I
I
I 1
1 ,
1 , 1
1 KO-(011 ca11114.1
..1, III-Si 4941F+1 I
•ii . ii ' i
gp i_.001 ' ■ I
it 2-/P IA F-4E---- • ' 1 Pt t # I
' I
1 +--•., ,--1g I
/Fi 1 vGirL,
I , ,,...Irg, . ,00,..6c, 1
FL),
..),..0%._
ti r I P. . --
I i'
I 1 I 0 e:Pci.goir
4.,T4 H-I ; A go.ie ..--;--,
‘11 I•
1 12-enVE. 2v Ii--Ian* ,
PI r
,2 I I --11 ' —1 17 -1 - - fivF.:41s-r6-V Fe•44161 '
il ' , 1
:■ = - - e-,erf-R..2.1e 4 Po9F---iate,15
■\, I I 'II 1 I _i d I 1,0 I.)"..',Ira-10.esis
I, I 2:1MM.. 1414Y e •7y2.I r P 1 i I
tA i I 1 -...,_
04eu w . lit 1 + 41-01I..1.... 4 441./94.
fk I -__...,--,.--.7...',.....-...,.........-.......,....,,PI -,---• -T- -1-t-_*---1.=-----
1 s i • . °
up i r '-;-r-• , : 1: 11*.l. ,___i
_,o
, :
.1-
77*,.V.-r....=,........." ".....-.0.,,,......... • ...,,i —• -----4‘. I I
I = ' 1411172'5 14'
gl ,__„......... ac---......,.--, ,'„-,. • e I I-I ia SI, ' , In1144Pr6
411cook I . Ir ,'
4lEpYL Mt, t.,y . , ----. •-•--- 41 Ie I 1
A Fr-44 rrtviaRAL. I 71-.---"- ••,,a la , i )11, I I ' --I' I
tet-c,t,41-TrK,
• ;Ai-, ,47 II, ' '; I y \
4(/' ' . , el 1- ,
-
. ,
ki.__ A , , , (.\ •• I i
./ )11',. I
0 iz 1
I,
al- I,
1" J
i , it , I .11
..
t sillpum
O '; i •■, .. . I, I
■■Nibh.' ■IIIIII■■■
61 0 UI-4 P N,00 F2- F145.1-I -
v41...11_01,
..#22Euzzaat iiiEt4;4,4 ev-wAut,
. 41060 3...a.s-lb
PAciR-Z cfllifte.
..._ . ... . . .
H 110
4'•i crauovaa
.r.
riv
1114,'4��4.44)
lvanlor J.3394
Silo i1
Iowa oiloq
-nrr 7 a Vor ^1.70m
1wedLa 3;eV
Anil,.
( . ,w 91-71�.
•
iJ . 00i4dNck'
almovitoviamvv -A Jades
-vrl go 10.4 RO't
1 c.
I *1
riatgra Narolt1
L
e y a s - - ra0 " ate` �0iV.Ovtia� e -�4.^_..*Ik4' ..
,� ALLEN J•., y
JEFF R E
�: RIDS �� ��.
0 R C '—__=
ARTIFACTS �■ �
DECOR AR Y"y MI .
DEC Y
i _- 20( ` _--
A k
—Nil ,II ;! 'C%v l,�
•
�Y
� M 4'
irli .1.,41 i' k...j
... - .- _ ■
■
iiiitimm6prii4iItitillb . .
...m.
IMP 'Otto fir
t 1
,r,
4141%-.."9"
., Ili .ild
F . -
r 410
r.,
:>$11116
- - - II II 1 I I
1111111' -:i41111111111111111V
.4*110111111141.11 Mil ill 1 I I.
illi i ! Ili '
. ._.4010,7„,41„, ,,_,_,_, _ or
..--, ----- .':
_ . .
.__
, -,_.• _-----___________ _ __ _________
R.)user Poi t1{--
asQ r 11/19/2013
o lao13
4
a ll
zo,ii
'
---
. Pro-.'. f ----•r
-_—
11114111%11‘
1
11/19/2013
k
y ALLEN
mg )EFFRE
• III'. t
.1. _ 1j .
-
2