Loading...
CUP1994-00009POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ...:. �._ �_..... 3:.:>...., �. �. k.........., .,.._...�._,»_...��%...- rp3l,,. �-.. ���.d�::�- ..,..aV, r -e,� ,:,��a.�,y u��cSZ'., -k�. ..ua -ik. 7... :• .r.x y ��� .....�.,,.... ar�r.�x.a:m+na�,.tx a.x,�t -�f._ � Aso. l�.__..- zgat:_ �:. c:.,•_:.,�.�._..n.".�:1�- '.,... � ",..... i `�: 1 St. James Episcopal Church Attn Tom Lowery 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 RE; ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH, CUP 94.0009 FEE IN -LIEU OF UNDERGROUNDING Dear Mr. Lowery: On Thursday, September 4, 1997, I spoke to Mr. Jack Howard from your church who indicated that St. James would need a letta from the City explaining the fee in -lieu of undergrounding overhead utility lines. Basically, Condition #9 of the CUP 94 -0009 approval required St. James to either place the existing overhead utility lines along Bull Mountain Road underground, or pay a fee in -lieu. St, James opted to pay the fee, which is due prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, The fee is calculated based on the frontage of the site of Bull Mountain Road, The church frontage measures approximately 257 feet; the fee is equal to $27,50 per lineal foot of frontage. Therefore, the fee for St, James is $7 *068,00, If you should have any questions about this fee, please feel free to contact me at 639.4171, ext. 318. Sincerely, Brian D. Rager, PE Development Review Engineer \btittatO90a stjm.$tt i 3125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6394171 MD (503) 684 -277 FAISIBIEZIOURIBM AFFIDAVIT T OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lansford, being Prat duly sworn /affirm:, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF 'DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Bearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (marked Exhibit' °A ") was mailed to each na p,ed . ersons at the address shown on the attache list (marked Exhibit "B") on the day of '+e i 1995, said NOTICE OF PUBLIC EEARINC/D CI ION as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate ,. ; , r, roar , 1995 and deposited in the United bulletin board on t � ,' : � •� day of deb . States Mail on the ,I _ day of Februarys 1995; postage prepaid. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed "3efore me on the OFFICIAL SEAL ,sr;, INANE GIsJEtti t 0 w • NOTARY PI.Ir t.Ic.npEcOF� � . k?" CO'4k^IS:310N NO. COS977 � :SIC pl E:KPIR : � Y aEPi''. 7, 1956 ; :R rn.V 1,›ZI W wry NOTARY PUB •.' j F OREG My CGomnirsio xpires: PILE INFO.: ea-P - 0601 617 3 -kite5 0)60846 eittackt. /8, — NOTICE OP MAW °ADM POR THE Ka Vr ..y LEGIBILITY STRIP Nam of Owner: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Address of Property: CITY OF TIGARD Washington Crn nty, Oregon AMENDED NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER • BY HEARINGS OFFICER St. Jame Episcopal Church 11 11 SW� �Iloun yin Road 1456A SW Hunlock S reel Exit/Vs 4 Concerning Case Number(s): CUP 04.8009 Tax Map and Lot Nas).: 2S1,10BD tax lot 100,,,,,, City: Tigard State: Or zip: 9.7,223_, City: Yiar State: Oregon Zip: 97223, Request: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish haillsunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Zone: R•2 (Residentiol, 2 unitslacre) The R•2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential troatmont homes, farming, manufactured horses, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Action: ❑ Approval as requested Apprc,al with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: El Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies Tha affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator El The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON FEDRUARY a2, 19E6 UNLESS AN APPEAL :IS FILED' .; Final Incision: The ador,.ed findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can he obtained from the City of Tigard t'lann`ng Department, Tigard City Hall, 13126 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 07223. i.... is _ with 18 32.290 (0) and 18.32.370, ., a� i . .. � j ANA: Any party to rho decision may appeal this decision in accordance notice is given and sent, The which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ton (10) days after noti g Pp forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.08 plus appeal may be submitted on City fo transcript costs, not in excess of $5110.00. THE DEADLIN E FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL 18 3 :30. P.M, ON FEBRUARY 22w.1906. questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (603) 630.4171. HEARINGS OFFICER NoTIGE OF FINAL ORDER Feb`Ud.ty'` 91 1995 St. J+m.A xpijas pi i chuxol4 M VP 04.00091 • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by St. James Episcopal Church for a: conditional use permit to remodel an existing church at 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) FINAL ORDER CUP 94-0009 (St. James Episcopal Church) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to remodel an existing ding church by adding. an acolytes' preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, converting an eatitting parish hall to offices and a new entry, and adding a two-story parish hall and Sunday school wing to the church. The applicant will add 10,190 square feet and remove 1895 square feet for a net addition of 8295 square feet. Hearings Offfcer Larry Epstein held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on January 23, 1995, City staff recommended conditional approval of the permit. The applicant accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions of approvals except several conditions that require the applicant to make frontage improvements along Bull Mountain Road and to install utilities underground or a pay a fee in lieu thereof. Instead the applicant proposed to defer the frontage improvements and utility work or payment until a local improvement district is formed to Improve a larger portion of SW Bull Mountain Road. Four witnesses testified in favor of defening the road improvements, arguing frontage improvements would be unsafe, inefficient and costly. No one else appealed at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the appli.czttion. The hearings officer cloned the record at the end of the hearing and took the case under advisement. LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road:. WCTIvl 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density ZONING: R-2 (Residential, 2 units per acre) APPLICANT AND OWNER: St. James Episcopal Church APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code ("CDC') Chapters 19.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106 18.108, 18.130, 18.150, and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7,1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8,1,3 STAFF RECOMIvIENDATIGN: Conditionally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approved II, FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section H of the City of Tigard Staff Report, III APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report, Ave 1— &arms Officer Final Order' CUP 94-6009 (Si, !aims Epsicopal Chords) • ' 4 4 ' • • • • TV`. HEARING, TESTIMONY, AN1) NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS L Hearin' Officer Larry Epstein receiived testimony at the public hearing about this application on January 23, 1995. A record! of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony), These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. City planner Will D'Andrea and engineer Michael Anderson testified for the City. Mr. D'Andrea summarized the staff report and recommendation. In response to comments from Washington County, Mr. Anderson testified that condition of approval 4 is intended to require the applicant to comply. wit!), County requirements, but it could be made more clear that the applicant is required to obtain certification of sight distance and to grant a non - access reservation except at approved access points. Mr. Anderson also testified that condition 5 should be modified to require dedication of a storm drEan easement for a new catch basin at the northeast corner of the property and access to the easement. 3. Architect Lane Brown testified for the applicant. He accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions except requirements for frontage improvements and for under grounding power lines in conditions of approval 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 He submitted seven photographs showing conditions along Bull Mountain Road at the site. a. He argued against street improvements recommended by City staff along Bull Mountain Road (i.ei, paving to 22 feet from the centerline of the road with a curb and 6 foot wide sidewalk) for the following reasons. (1) At the east end of the sidewalk, pedestrians would move from the sidewalk to the shoulder at a point with poor sight distance because of trees on the neighbors property to the east; trees on the property to the east would prevent motorists from seeing pedestrians coming onto the shoulder of Bull Mountain Road from a sidewalk abutting the church property. He argued it is safer for people to walk on the paved shoulder, because they can be seen more easily by traffic, Also, because of the grade difference between the site and the neighboring property to the east, a retaining wall about three feet high would be needed at the end of the walk, (2) At the west end of the sidewalk, there is a catch basin which obstructs its westerly extension. Because there is no street lighting at the site, motorists might fail to see a pedestrian emerging onto the street from the sidewalk or the pedestrian might accidentally walk off the sidewalk into the catch basin. (3) Also he argued, because parking is not allowed along Bull Mountain Road and no bus service is available, the , sidewalk would not be usable by pedestrians from vehicle parking or transit access. West of the church is a subdivision of lots with access to streets internal to the subdivision and not to Bull Mountain Road. He argued g y t recommended conditions that the applicant existing overhead utilities alonS.W. Bull Mountain Road underground r pay a fee in` lieu of doing so, Existing power poles are located in the edge of the existing paved portion of Bull Mountain Road, They also serve properties across Bull Mountain Road, therefore, either the poles have to be relocated and continue to provide service to the properties across the road, or service to those properties has to be placed underground. If the properties across the street continue to be served by overhead lines for now, when those lines are ... relocated underground in the future, some of the recommended street and sidewalk improvements would have to be dug u p to accommodate the lines. Page 2 =-- Hearings Officer Find Order OUP 94-0009 (gt, James £pskopad` Chisrch) c. Mr. Brown argued that it would be better to do all of the improvements p when adjacent properties develop pedestrian access or when a local improvement district is farmed to finance improvements of a larger section of S.W. Bull Mountain Road. 4. Church members John Burgess and John Swiski agreed with Mr. Brown. Mr. Swiski testified he runs along the paved shoulder of :,il1 Ir ountain Road regularly, and a brief section of sidewalk abutting the church is not ,cessary. Church Pastor Douglas be Hadley agreed with the other witnesses, and testifieu that the improv fo for shored blone, coordinated in a timely manner. The improvements would be costly particularly if the church has to improve the frontage within 200 feet of the site. 5. Mr. Anderson argued the conditions of approval for front Age improvements are within 200 feet required by . the CDC, including consideration of improvements n °ecessary e CDC. of a site, and those irnprofernents cannot be deferred unless it complies those with th He C. argued Deferring the improvements �m, this case does not c��rYipl�y�with e privately as part of an the cost of improvements is less if those improvements recast adds He said that the local improvement disu'ct (LB)) p adjoining development. . He stated that the; sidewalk does not have about 30 percent to the costs of improvement. s to be contiguous to the curb, but that it can meander away from the street so that ilk safes can be avoided. That and other design measures can make the ends of the He argued the improvements are timely, because the expansion of the church will increase its He impact on the road and increase the need for pedestrian features access accommodate the1 to noted that surrounding property is developed and dues not have d irect sexe Mountain Road, so the owners of that property have little motivation to join A off. improve that road. The City and County have no plans to improve Bull Mountain Brown repeated concerns about the grade differences between ... this site 6. d adjacent ro roes and safe sidewalk endings at the east and west property Mr. this site and J P � Pe. lines. Mr. Cooper, a neighbor, argued the improvement would be piecemeal and untimely. the high cost of the required improvements, Mr. Burgess repeated the applicants can try to form an LID to pay for the improvements. Ma's ur Anderson noted that pp • rp by agency comments in .The hearings officer incorporates b reference the ��� notes Section IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report. The hearings that the conditions of approval recommended by City staff do not explicitly include all of the information recommended by Washington County DLTJT• V. EVAL(JATION OF REQUEST 1, City staff recommended approval of the application based on the findings in the . y J conditions m at the hearing. The applicant Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval as as amended, without correction largely accepted the findings and recommended conditions, as or ob objection, The applicant objected to conditions of approval 2, 3, d , 8 and 9 for the reasons described herein. Washington County DLUT recommended additional conditions. 2. g conditional use permit does or can . that proposed on the findings in Section V of the hearin s officer finds ti 1. withlthe applicable standards of thn CDC, comply i .. PP City of Tigard Staff Report, and the following findings, 3, CDC section 18.164.030.A.1 requires an applicant for development to improve streets adjoin � n,g the sit:, including pedestrian and utility improvements. CDC section 18.164.030EA,1.c allows the City to: Page 3 hearings Officer Final Order CUP 94 -0009 (t Jaines Epskcapal Church) LEGIBILITY STRIP • [.Accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist. (i) A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; (ii) A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; (iii) Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties, it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant innprovenhent to street safety or capacity; (iv) The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; (v) The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential, and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or (vi) Additional p annin g work is required to define the approp riate design standards for the street and the application is for a project whichh ld contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street: 4: The hearings officer un derstands and appreciates the arguments by the applicants. The hearings officer finds that those reasons are nee sufficient in this case to warrant deferring frontage improvements ea payment of a fee in lieu of installing utilities underground for the following reasons. a. The hea +,ings officer -finds it is feasible to achieve proper design standards, based on the frodings regarding the site, the preliminary site plan and required City review and approval of final plans, Design standards allow for a meandering sidewalk u install . :.i� • applicant did and other adjustments to accommodate natural and developed conditions or lieu' not show it is infeasible for the applicant to install utilities underground o pay b: The hea rings officer finds that a pal dal improvement will not create a • motorists : pe : : ditions at the east and west potential safety hazard to or pedestrians due to con edges of the property. The improvements can be designed in a way that provides for pedestrian safety. For + y .. : or hoc end ie s fence, a and. pure bollards 1) for ins sidewalk top prevent users from continuing off can be installed at the ends of the p - the sidewalk. The sidewalk can be extended to the curb at the edge of the shoulder on _ . pedestrians y hounder of Bull Molt tain Road from the end When destrans enter the s � It is true that they would not be road. i d . travel llane. They side" Thie are vi�ib e: visible as if the. entering a but mean the transition walk they are not en along tki�, road shoulder, t that does not creates a sight distance hazard. The hearings officer finds pedestrians also are safe on a as they : nds sight because of the grade-separated . sidewalk �shoulder, character of a allc w even more so than on slope of the site frontage and adjoining road sections, sidewalk: Given the relatively g p of the sidewalk and CDC requirements. g y� unobstructed views motorists ices 'will have lighting, the the mostly u : hearings off finds the sideway will not be subject to a sight for street g g, Page 4 --- Hearings Officer rind Order CUP 94,0009 (S: James EpsicopCJ 1. Aurch) W • • 1 w distance hazard. Motorists have a responsibility to be watchful for pedestrians on the shoulder. The City could require trimming or removal of trees in the right of way if necessary to improve sight distance. The transition from the sidewalk to the shoulder could be situated where sight distance can be maximized, even if the sidewalk does not extend to the edge of the property. (2) Installing utilities underground or paying a fee in lieu thereof does not create a potential safety hazard, because it does not affect sight distance or other characteristics ` s that contribute to motorist or pedestrian safety, except to the extent that, by installing utilities underground, safety is improved by removing one obstacle to people and vehicles - -- power poles. c. The hearings officer finds that it :3 unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foible future, because the properties adjoining the site's Bull Mountain Road frontage already are developed. Therefore, the frontage improvement can be deferred consistent with CDC section 18.164.030.A.1.c if that improvement does not represent a significant improvement to street safety or capacity. (1) The hearings officer finds that the evidence is not overwhelming, g but the frontage improvement in this case does provide a significant improvement to street safety by providing a more improved, grade- and /or distance- separated pathway for pedestrian and cyclists along the relatively large frontage of the church. (2) There was some dispute about the need for such a feature and, , ._ u hearings officer finds there is.a need for therefore, the significance of rt,, However, the g pedestrian d bicycle features to the standards required by the CDC. Although enhancux edestrian an there is a paved shoulder for bicycle along Bull Mountain Road, that is not the safest facility, because of its proximity to and common surface with the road. People now walk, run and bicycle along the church frontage based on the oral testimony, sometimes to attend church activities. A sidewalk also would enhance safety for people who are dropped -off g be � to attend church activities In the future, Tri -Met bus service along Bull Mountain Road activities. can bt, provided along that road even if it is not provided now. ,. part, the relatively large s ize of the church frontage makes the improvement significant, even though incremental. (3) The incremental improvement is ,elated and proportionate to the impact and its expansion, . consistent with that the improvements to impact of the church It is w recognize Cr standards and practices require the improvements cant enough h to � and, therefore, ` ' P ... in this case. are needed and signif g require The hearings g frontage . improvements (includes utility or fees) ae not i confict with an adopted ca p ital improvement plan and d are not related to a land division. e. The hearings officer finds frontage improvements (including utility improvements t additional plan planning can !Ay define the � or fees) can be done the street in this as�e terror work to on adopted appropriate design standards o Y standards and modifications to those standards permitted by law. f The hearings officer finds the cost deferred, improvements cost is not is not r releva to whether the improvements should be , one of the relevant t considerations in CDC section 18.164 .030: A. 1. c. The hearings officer acknowledges that it may be necessary to remove and replace a small section , sections of sidewalk �. want and may n or sectro frontage improvements in the future to extend underground utilities to properties across Page 5 - Hearings Officer Pinal Order CUP 944009 (St. James Epsleoopal Church) :** • .". * . 4a,. 1*,:, • * ty, • ;, -4- • 4 0 • 4,4 • Bull Montan Road if undergromad service to those properties is not made when the . frontage improvements are made. However, that is not one of the considerations in CDC section 18.164.030.A11.c. 5. To better coordinate City /County review of future applications required to implement the conditional use permit, the hearings officer finds that the conditions of approval should be amended to more clearly reflect the requirements of Washington County for access to Bull Mountain Road. V1 SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visi ted the site and surrounding area. He observed the existing access, structures, vegetation, and grades on the site and adjoining property and the condition of the adjoining street. '/LL CONCLUSION AND DECISION I. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development iat occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2, The applicant's request, CUP 95-0009, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions in Section VII of the Staff Report, with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 4 is hereby amended to read as follows: The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and Transportation of Washington County to perform work wits the right-of-way of SVV Bull Mountain Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit.. To fulfill this condition, the applicant shall submit the following to Washington County except to the extent modified by the County: (A) A completed ' Design Option fonn, 750 administration deposit, certifi' catior from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exi3ts or what specific improvements must be made to provide the requisite Sight distance and two sets of engineered plans for construction of frontage improvements, access and roadway drainage (Contact Land Development Services staff Tracy Stone or Carolyn Cook @ 648-8761). (B) Pinancial assurance for the construction of approved frontage improvements. (C) Dedication of right of way to the County as neceslary for a 33-foot half-width from the centerline of Bull Mountain Road along the site frontage and of a 1-foot non- access reserve strip along the Bull Mountain Road frontage of the site except at approved access points ' Pete 6 — Ifearitto Officer Find Order CUP 944009 (Si. lanie,t Epiicopall Church) .4.‘" a .4 , b. Condition of approval 5 is hereby amended to read as follows: The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public storm water *ainage system or to an on-site systan designed to prevent moll onto the adjacent p*operty and s)211 dedicate to the City an easement for th", storm drain And catch basin to be located in the northwest corner of the sit t and for access to that storm drain and catch basin to the satisfiction of the City Engineer. • wary, 1995. Pagel — &adage Officdr Final (hide, COP 94409 (St. James 4sicapal Chatiels) ct 1.10' II il III 1 IINFARLATA11101. a 4111111b. id . Amp I • illititt- Ai I • aM10-------- • I IIPIEOI • NL BULL MMOUNTAIN RD 'Altai mi Ilill NM Imp VIEW WiA a w BIPY Ilk tom isiiii 11 01611, APNRIG 11,40 4 * 44t gerelfr iiitb ISA • , ‘. ‘•^ • * • , , „,. VICINITY EXHIIIT MAP CASE NO. cop clq t90HN C. SWISKIE 14383 $W SCI D TZGAtib, OR 97224 DOUGLAS J. HADLEY 10286 SW LADY MARION DRIVE TIGARD, OR 97223 ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH 11511 SW HULL1 UN'TAIN ROAD TIGARD, OR 97224 JOHN BURGESS 2999 SW HOMESTEADER WEST LINN OR 97068 4 CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon of NOTICE OF FiNAO. ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER Name of Owner: James E piscopa.0 Church Name of Applicant': Same Address of Applicant: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Roa Address of Property: 8456A SW Hemlock Street 0.k As' b& Concerning Case Number(s): CUP 94.0009 Tax Map and Lot fIo(sl.: 281 1090 tax In ILO City: Tigard State gram Zip: 9 223 ity: "bid_ -_ State: Oregon, Zip: 97223 Request: A request for Conditional use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish halllsunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Zone: R•2 (Residential, 2 units /acre) The R-2 Zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Action: ❑ Approval as requested Approval with conditions El Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Mall and mailed to: Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JANUARY 18 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAI. IS FILED Final Decision: The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223: Anal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance vvith 18:32:290 (B) and Section 18:32,370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within tarp (10) days after notice is given and sent: The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal feels) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of 000.00, THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL Is 3 :30`• P.M , ON JANUARY 18, 1999: Questions= If you have any questions, please call the Cit y of Tigard Planning D. e p artnent at (503) 639-4171. ,. :EARINOS OFFICER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER 1 `ebrtta.ty 8, 1.0,0t • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding aa application by St. James Episcopal ) FINAL ORDER Church for a conditional use permit to remodel an ) CUP existing church at 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road ) CU in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (St. James Episcopal Church) L SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to remodel an existing church by adding an acolytes' preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, converting an existing entry, and adding a two -story p ' parish hall to offices and a new e hall and Sunday school vying to the church. The applicant will add 10,190 square feet and remove 1895 square feet for a net addition of 8295 square feet. Hearings Officer La: ry Epstein held a duly noticed public heating regarding the of the application on January 23, 1995. City staff recommended conditional r approval approvals permit. The applicant accepted the Staff Report and recommended co a pp rrs except several conditions that require the applicant to make frontage improvements along . g pay lieu thereof, Mull Mountain Road and to instil utilities underground or a a n�f� and in '�` ork or applicant p to defer the frontage improveme payment nt; until a local improvement district is formed to improve a larger portion of SW Bull Mountain Road. Four witnesses testified in favor of deterring the road improvements, arguing frontage improvements would be unsafe, inefficient and costly. No one else appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and took the case under advisement. LOCATION 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road; WCTM 251 1081), tax lot 100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density ZONING: R -2 (Residential, 2 units per acre) APPLICANT AND OWNER: St. James Episcopal Church ity _ and n Policies , APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code, Chapters Pla 19► 46 18100 108, 18.130, 1 8. 150, and 18, 164. Comprehensive 18.1�U2, 18.106 18. 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approved II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS g + incorporates . . y _... i s about the site .. . Officer , b � reference the findings i and The Hearings surroundings in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The Hearings Officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report, Pa `,e 1 hearings Officer Final Order' COP 94 -0009 (St. Janes Epsic opal Chum ) •w . N. HEARING, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein received testimony at the public hearing about 1995 A record of that testimony is included Exhibit C ere as ' pp on January 23, . this application o Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and E (Written. Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. City planner Will D'Andrea and engineer Michael Anderson testified for the City. Mr. D'Andrea summarized the staff report and recommendation. In response to comments from Washington County, Mr. Anderson testified that condition of approval 4 is intended to require the applicant to comply with County requirements, but it could be made more clear that the applicant is required to obtain certification of sight distance and to grant a non access reservation except at approved access points. Mr. Anderson also testified that condition 5 should be rihodified to require dedication of a storm drain easement for a new catch basin at the northeast corner of the property and access to the easement 3, for the applicant. He accepted the °Staff Report Architect conditions except for frontage improvements and for under and teconimended eo p requirements grounding power lines in conditions of approval 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9. He submitted seven photographs showing conditions along Bull Mountain Road at the site. a. He argued against street improvements recommended by City staff along Bull Mountain Road (i.e., paving to 22 feet from the centerline of the road with a curb and 6 foot wide sidewalk) for the following reasons. 4� alk pedestrians would move from the .., (1) At ,he eas$ with of poor Si h distance because of trees on the the sidewalk to the shoulder at a point p g neighbors' property to the east, trees on the property to the east would prevent motorists from seeing pedestrians coming onto the shoulder of Bull Mountain Road from a sidewalk abutting the church to g property. He argued it is safer for people walk on the paved shoulder, because they'can be seen more easily by traffic. Also, because of the grade difference between the site and the neighboring property to the east, a retaining wall about three feet high would be needed at the end of the walk. (2) At the west end of the sidewalk, there is a catch basin which obstructs its westerly extension: Because there is no street lighting at the site, motorists rni t fail to see a pedestrian emerging onto the street from the sidewalk or the pedestrian l might accidentally walk off the sidewalk into the catch basin. (3) Also he argued, because parking is not allowed lot be along Bull .j + i � � available, e sidewalk t of the church is a subdivision of Mountain Road and no bus service is a sailab th internal access. We pedestrians is with ces5 to streets internal to the subdivision and not to Bull Mountain Road. b. He argued against recommended conditions that the applicant install nstall existing . utilitiesalong S.W. Bull Mountain Road undergrounnd o aid onion o eu a fee in li of do n g so. isti per poles are located in the edge of the existi g paved portion f Bull Mountain Road, They also serve properties across Bull Mountan Road therefore, P have vide service to the properties across relocated and continue p to provide ` the poles have to be rel has to � laced underground. If the properties either the road, or service to those properties by p g across the street continue to be served by overhead lines for now, when those lines are relocated underground in the future: , recommended street and sidewalk some of the improvements would have to be dug -up to accommodate the lines. Page 2 Lam- ,(eanngs Office Piaui ()niter CUP 94-0609 (Sti fwnes Ep icopal Chuii h) C' Mr. Brown argued that it would be better to do all of the improvements when adjacent properties develop pedestrian access or when a local improvement district is formed to finance improvements of a larger section of S.W. Bull Mountain Road. 4. Church members John Burgess and John Swiski agreed with Mr. Brown, Mr. Swiski testified he runs along the paved shoulder of Bull Mountain Road regularly, and a brief section of sidewalk abutting the church is not necessary. Church Pastor Douglas Hadley agreed with the other witnesses, and testified that the improvements should be coordinated in a timely manner. The improvements would be costly for the church alone, particularly if the church has to improve the frontage within 200 feet of the site S. Mr. Anderson argue „1 the conditions of approval for frontage improvements are required by the CDC, including consideration of improvements necessary within 200 feet of a site and those improvements cannot be deferred unless it complies with the CDC. Deferring the improvements in this case does not comply with those standards He argued the cost of improvements is less if those improvements are made privately as part of an adjoining development He said that the local improvement district (LID) process adds about 30 percent to the costs of improvements. He stated that the sidewalk does not have to be contiguous to the curb, but that it can meander away from the street so that trees can be avoided, That and other design measures can make the ends of the sidewalk safe. He argued the improvements are timely, because the expansion of the church will increase its impact on the road and increase the need for pedestrian features to accommodate them. He noted that surrounding property is developed and does not have direct access to Bull Mountain Road, so the owners of that property have little motivation to join an LID to improve that road. The City and County have no plans to improve Bull Mountain Road. 6„ In rebuttal, Mr. Brown repeated concerns about the grade differences between this site and adjacent properties and safe sidewalk endings at the east and west property lines. Mr. Cooper, a. neighbor, argued the improvement would be piecemeal and untimely. Mr. Burgess repeated concerns about the high cost of the required improvements. Mr. Anderson noted that the applicants can try to form an LID to pay for the improvements. 7. The hearings officer incorporates by reference the NPO and agency comments in Section IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report The hearings officer notes that the conditions of approval recommended by City staff do not explicitly include all of the infonrotion recommended by Washington County DUN. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST 1. City staff recommended approval of the application based on thelindings in the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval as amended at the hearing, The applicant largely accepted the findings and recommended conditions, as amended, without correction or objection, The applicant objected to conditions of approval 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 for the reasons described herein. Washington County DLUT recommended additional conditions. 2. The hearings officer finds that the proposed conditional use permit does or can comply with the applicable standards of the CDC, based on the findings in Section V of the City of Tigard Staff Report, and the following findings. 3. CDC section 18,164.030,A.1 requires an applicant for development to improve streets adjoining the site, including pedestrian and utility improvements. CDC section 18.164.030,A,I,c allows the City to Page 3— Rearingt Officer Final Order CUP 94-0009 (t Jies gpsicagai Church) [Alccept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: (i) A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; (ii) (ii A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to mo for ist or pedestrians; iii Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties, it is unlikely that street improvements would be extei de hi the review future and the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement tt street safety or capacity; - (iv) The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; (v) The improvement is associated, with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or (vi) Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic o n the street. pp iates the arguments by the . 4, The hearings officer understands and appreciates are not sufficient in this case to applicants. The hearings officer finds that those warrant deferring frontage improvements or payment of a fee in lieu of installing utilities underground for the following reasons: a. The hearings officer finds it is feasible to achieve proper design n required g �. i standards allow site p standards, based on the findings regarding the site, the pnelimi w for a meandering sidewalk City review and approval of final plans. Design star p e adjustments to accommodate natural and developed conditions. fee did The applicant and other adj not show it is infeasible for the applicant to install utilities underground or pay a f in lieu= partial = i met will not and create a b The hearings officer finds that a artu�l improve potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians due to conditions west edges of the property. The improvements can be designed in a way that provides for pedestrian safety. For " clearly and secure bollards or other barriers (1) For u►stance; c1 y installed at the ends: of the sidewalk to prevent users from continuing off the end of ., can be `I`he sidewalk can lee extended . on the c tied to the curb at the edge of the shoulder o the sidewalk: . enter the shoulder of Bull Mountain Road from the end of the road -.. When pedestrians en •. � a true that they would not sidewalk they are not entering a travel lane They are visible. It is tru as if the_. walked along the road shoulder, but that does not mean the transition be as visible ' y ` . h; � Fans also are safe a ht distance hazard. The hearings officer finds pedestrians s ireful character of a sidewalk .... , y ,a - - grade-separated adjoining .._ � than on a shoulder. because of the raddee sd, r ted g to � � even more so frontage road sections, sidewalk: Given the relatively gentle slope v�l have of the sidewalk; and CDC requirements ,. the mostly unobstructed views motorists for street lighting, the hearings officer finds the sidewalk will not be subject to a sight Paige 4 - Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 94.0009 (St, fames Epsecopd Church) 411:11' ' ■ • • 't • distance hazard. Motorists have a responsibility to be watchful for pedestrians on the shoulder. The City could require trimming or removal of trees in the right of way if necessary to improve sight distance. The transition from the sidewalk to the shoulder could be situated where sight distance can be maximized, even if the sidewalk does not extend to the edge of the property. (2) Installing utilities underground or paying a fee in lieu thereof does not create a potential safety hazard, because it does not affect sight distance or other characteristics that contribute to motorist or pedestrian safety, except to the extent that, by installing utilities underground, safety is improved by removing one obstacle to people and vehicles --- power poles. c. The hearings officer finds that it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future, because the properties adjoining the site's Bull Mountain Road frontage already are developed. Therefore, the frontage improvement can be deferred consistent with CDC section 18.164.030.A.1.c if that improvement does not represent a 'significant improvement to street safety or capacity. (1) The hearings officer finds that the evidence is not overwhelming, but the frontage improvement in this case does provide a significant iroproverrient to street safety by providing a more improved, grade- and/or distance separated pathway for pedestrian and cyclist's along the relatively large frontage of the church. (2) There was some dispute about the need for such a feature and, therefore, the sigmfi° cance of it. However, the hearings officer finds there is a need for enhancing pedestrian and bicycle features to the standards required by the CDC, Although there is a paved shoulder for pedestrians along Bull Mountain Road, that is not the safest facility, because of its proximity to and common surface with the road. People now walk, run and bicycle along the church frontage based on the oral testimbny, sometimes to attend church activities. A sidewalk also would enhance safety for people who are dropped-off along Bull Mountain Road to attend church activities. In the future, Tri-Met bus service can be provided along that road even if it is not provided now In part, the relatively large size of the church frontage ,nakes the improvement significant, even though incremental. (3) The incremental improvement is related and proportionate to the impact of the church and its expansion, It is consistent with City standards and practices to require the improvements in this case, and, therefore, to recognize that the improvements are needed and significant enough to require them in this case, d. The hearings officer finds frontage improvements (including utility improvements or fees) are not in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan and are not related to a land division. e. The hearings officer finds frontage an' provements (including utility improvements or fees) can be done without additional planning work to define the appropriate design standards for the street in this case. The City can rely on adopted standards and modifications to those standards permitted by law. f. The hearings officer rinds the cost of frontage improvements is not relevant to whether the unit provements should be deferred, because cost is not one of the considerations in CDC section 18,164.030.A.1.c. The hearings officer acknowledges that it may be necessary to remove and replace a small section or sections of sidewalk and frontage improvements hi the future to extend underground utilities to properties across Page S ftedririgs Officer' Find 0140 CUP 04-0000 (Si. Janes Epsicopai CI:Wyk) • • • • r • ' ; .F• • • 6w: i +w Bull Mountain Road if underground service to those properties is not made when the fronta ge imprave>nnents are made. However, that is not one of the considerations in CDC section 1$.164.030.A.1.c. 5, To better coordinate City / County review of future applications . required to implement the conditional use permit, the bearings officer finds that the conditions of approval should be amended to more clearly reflect the requirements of Washington County for access to bull Mountain Road. V. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER ` ' © and surrounding area. Ile observed the existing struc structures, vegetation, g and grades the o the site and adjoining p�yropert... and the access, �f �7�a"'°'s .� r+ 17 property y condition of the adjoining street VIi. CONCLUSION AND DECISIpN 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs rs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. The applicant's west, CUP 95 -0009, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions in Section Vil of the Staff Report, with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 4 is hereby amended tto read as follows: of Land Use and Transportation + � j� permit from �e Department. The applicant shall obtain a facility of Washington County to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Bull Mountain Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit.. To'fulfll this condition, the applicant shall submit the following to Washington County except to the extent modified by the County: (A) A completed "Design Of Li on form, $750 _ administration deposit, certification itnra a registered professional engineer that aS ute sight distance exists or what specific improvements roust be made to provide the requisite sight distance and two sets of engineered plans for construction of frontage improvements, access and roadway drainage (Contact Land Development Services staff Tracy Stone or Carolyn Cook @ 648.8761). (B) Financial assurance for the construction of approved frontage improvements. (C) Dedication of right of way to the County as n for a 33 -foot half-width from the centerline of Bull Mountain Road along the site frontage and of a 1 -foot non- strip . g Bull Mountain Road frontage of access reserve stri aloe the the site a eept at approved access points' Page 6 Haltings 000 Final Oder' CUP 94-0069 (Si James Esicopal church) a b. Condition of approval S is hereby amended to read as follows: The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public storm water drainage system or to an on -site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent propprty and shall dedicate to the City an easement for the storm drain and catch basin to bt; located in the northwest corner of the site and for mss to that storm drain and catch basin to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. � �Y Page 7 *.a. it'earings Rcee Final Oder CUP 044009 (t lames Epsk4,pat Chinch) MCFARLAND .,4 .1*. 4' • I. CASE NO, Cu? . qq-000g LANE BROWN....ARCHITECT 510 NW 3RD PORTLAND/ OR . 97209 RANDY OCOPER 12560 SR GLACIER LILY CT G , OR 97223 jOHN Cr. SWISItIE 14383 SW CHESTERFIELD TICS, at 97224 DOUGLAS J. HADLEY 10286 SW LADY MARION i VE TI D, OR 97223 ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH 11511 SW BULLIWUNTAIN ROAD TIC/ OR 97224 JOHN HESS 2999 SW HOMEMADER WEST Lam, OR 97068 *F.Ve 'me goo, I 6 6 b /46' CP410e1.6.Pl) BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Saint James Episcopal Church to allow the addition of approximately 10,190 square feet to an existing church facility. CASE: SUMMARY: STAFF REPORT CUP 94-0009 I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST Conditional Use Permit CUP 94 -0009 A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and addition of a two story Parish Hall/Sunday School wing to an existing church building, The total area of building to be added is 10,190 square feet, to be removed is 1,895 square feet, for a net total facility area increase of 8,295 square feet. APPLICANT: St, Janes Episcopal Church 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 OWNER: Same COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density ZONING DESIGNATION: R -2 (Residential, 2 units per acre), LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 tom, tax lot 100), APPLICABLE LAW; Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18,100, 18--102, 18,1060 18,108, 18,130, 18,150, and 18.164, Comprehensive Plan Policies 24L1, 421, 7, 1.2, 73J, 7.4.4, 8,1,1, and 8.1.3, STAFF RECOr STAFF vIMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions II. SITE AND VICINITY INP'O[A; `ION HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94.0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 1 yr ack rnation: The subject site was annexed into the City of Tigard in 1978. No other development applicati 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements t forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approvtti Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Ci imprehensive Plan. 3. Section .111321210a91 contains the following additional Conditional Use criteria for Religious Assembly and Accessory Uses: a. Lot Size: Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet; b. SetbacLi: On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meet visual clearance areas (Chapter 18.102); IlL The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; and v. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. 4. Section ,18.46.050, (R..2 Zone) states that except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18* no building in an R-2 one shall exceed 30 feet in height, HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 940009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 3 5. Section 18 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions) states that projections such as spires, domes and other similiar objects not used for human occupancy are not subject to the building height limitations. 6. Jection, 18.00 contains standards for landscaping and screening. a. Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan, and that the approval standards are the applicable standards contained in Section 18.100 and which are listed below: b. Section 18.100.030 (Street Trees) states that all development projects floating on a public, private street, or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.100.035, Section 18.100.035(A) requires that landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trues with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in subsection 18.100.035(B). Section 18.100.035(B) requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at it :unity ksina11, medium, or large). c. Section 18.100.110(M, (Screening of' Pas '°.ing and Loading Areas) requires the screening of parking and lot ding areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 7. Section 18, 102020 (Visual Clearance) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacen ..) intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle; hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 94.0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 4 provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. 8. Section 18.106 (Off-Street Parking and Loading) contains standards for parking and loading. a. Section laaikaalkn (Parking) requires 1 space for every 3 fixed seats or every 6 feet of bench length in the assembly area or every 50 square feet of floor area in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever is greater. b. Section 18,106.050(M) requires that artificial lighting on all off-street parking facilities shall be designed to deflect all light so as not to create a hazard to the public use of any road or street. c, The ArrAthans.with Disabilities ActLALD/11, which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 5 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. d. Section 18,106.020(P) (Bicycle Parking) requires one bicycle parking rfik space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. 9. Section 18.108,080 (Access and Circulation - Minimum Requirements) requires that uses which provide less than 100 parking spaces provide a minimum of one accesss with a width of 30 feet. The minimum pavement width shall be 24 feet. In addition, section 111211311/A1110.1 requires that circulation patterns within a development be designed to accomodate emergency vehicles. 10. Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 94-0009 ST. AMES EPISCOl'AL CHURCH Page 5 • • 1 L Section jJ14 I 3OJ (Signs) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area •opermitted in the R-3.5 zone. • 12. Chapter 18,150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must present rationale which complies with specified criteria in order to obtain approval. 13. Chapter 111,1_64 contairls standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164,030(Al requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section ja,16.1,11325.1 requires Major Collector streets to have a minimum 60 foot right-of-way and a 44 foot minimum roadway width, and 2-4 moving lanes. c, Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. d. Section 18,164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. B. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. 1. Policy 2,1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planing and development review process. 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. 3. Policy 7,1,2 provides the City will regtiire, as a condition of development approval, that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. HEARINGS orFicER CUP 54-0009 ST, JA1V1ES EPISCOF•AL CHURCH Page 6 • • 4. Palley 7.3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water disiticts. 5. Policy 7.4,4 requires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system, 6, Policy 8,1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 7, Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; ce The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, sidewalks to City standards within the develoiament. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided wheti the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. 1. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided comments which are summarized in the analysis of Section 18.164 below, The Unified Sewerage Agency states that a water quality facility shall be required, an erosion control permit is required and the storm system to connect to public system, Washington County Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL/ CHURCH Page 7 Resolution and Order 86-9$ contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to petfarn i a preliminary sight distance review for this project, because of the current work load. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road, PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE _CITY .OF TIGARD: 1. Submit to Land Development Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy Stone /Carolyn Cook, 6484761): a. Completed "Design Option" form. b. $750.00 Administration Deposit. c. Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer at the access point to SW Bull Mountain Road. Provide a detailed list of what improvements are necessary to provide adaquatM intersection sight distance. NOTE Any portion of the Administration Deposit not used by Washington County for plan approval, field inspections, and . contract administration will be returned to the applicant. If at any time during the project, the County's costs are higher than the amount deposited, Washington County Will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs. Two o (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW lull Mountain Road frontage. t EAR NOS OFFICER - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CI-IURCII Page 8 2. Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County standards in location as the existing access points., 3, Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. 4. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon comr2etiou of the following: a. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed, in conditions I.A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook, 648- 876 l) of Land Development Services will send the required forms to the applicant's representative en submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans. b. Provide evidence that the documents required by condition LC have been recorded. 3. The following dociuneuts shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: a. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 53 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. b. Provide a one-foot non.access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points, NOTE: Washington County Survey Division (built Itainawal, 693. 4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative. HEARINGS OFFICER . CUP 94-0009 ST, JA1VIES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 9 ' -•-• 4 . . • B. PRIOR TO ..()=Y2AtIgi L The road improvements required in by conditions LAI4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. 2. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements. 4. General Telephone and Electronics states that the ownershall coordinate telephone facility rearrangement, if any, with GTE Northwest incorporated. 5. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division, City of Tigard Building Department, Tigard Water Department, Tigard Police Department, Tigard Water District, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Portland General Electric have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST 1. Com fiance with Community Development Code. Section 18,130,040: The construction of a church in agno R-2 zone requires a Condital ion Use approval. This proposal is consistent with the applicable approval standards, As indicated on the site plan, the site will provide adequate area for the proposed expansion. Site characteristics are suitable for the expansion as the site contains adequate area and does not contain physical constraints, Adequate public facilities are present and currently serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of approval. Compliance with the applicable zoning district requirements, Conditional Use review and Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process. Section 11121212EI,111 is satisfied. The subject site is approximately 2.4 acres, well in excess of the minimum 20,000 square foot lot area. As indicated on the site plan, the building is in compliance with setback standards, Section 18,46, The applicant is proposing to expand an existing church facility. A church is classified in code section 18442 (Use Classifications) as Religious Assembly. HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 10 Code Section 18.46.040 allows Religious Assembly as a Conditional use. As indicated on the site plan, all setbacks are satisfied. The proposed structures are in compliance with height limitations, The conditional use criteria for a church also requires increased setbacks for buildings over 45 feet in height. This criteria is not applicable as the proposed additions are not greater than 45 feet in height. Section 18,100.015. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of trees and shrubs, and as addressed in the applicable sections below. Section 111.0. This requirement shall be satisfied as the site plan shows the addition of two new street trees. Section 1 100110(A). The preliminary p lan indicates the provision of 67 parking spaces. Based on the ratio of one tree per seven spaces, the applicant is required to provide approximately 10 parking lot trees. The site plan shows 11 parking lot trees, located within the existing landscaped area. Existing landscaping screens the parking lot from view, thereby satisfying the screening requirement, Section 18.102.020. As shown on the site plan, the vision clearance requirements are satisfied. Section 18.10 §.030111(8). The proposal does not include increasing the area of the sanctuary, therefore this application will not require the addition of required parking spaces. The applicant states that the sanctuary provides twenty - eight, 10 foot pews, q The site plan shows the provision of 67 parking spaces: requiring 47 parking spaces. p p . The site plan also indicates the provision of 3 handicapped acctssable parking spaces, satisfying ADA requirements. Section 18.10.050 . The preliminary site pima shows the location of lighting fixtures, satisfying this requirement. Section 18,106.020(P), . Based on the ratio of 1 bicytie rack per 15 vehicular spaces this site requires 4 bicylce parking spaces. The site plan shows the provision of 5 bicycle parking spaces, thereby satisfying this criteria. Section 18.108.080, This section satisfied as the plan provides for two, 24 foot access drives. HE ARIl3S OFFICER CIF 94., 0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page .w r. LEGIBILITY STRIP A • a .. 4. • Section 18.1 O8.O. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of a walkway connecting the front entrance of the building with the sidewalk along SW Bull lviountain Road, thereby satisfying this requirement, Section. i 14.130 A1. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Plcnning Division. Section 18.150,. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. PUBIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164:030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18,164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. STREETS: The existing parking lot for the church currently has two one -way driveways that connect to SW Bull Mountain Road, a Major Collector street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan. SW Bull Mountain Road is also a Washington County road. No change is proposed to the onsite driveway system. The existing right-of-way for SW Bull Mountain Road, as measured from the centerline of street, is 20 feet wide. The right - of-way required to match the existing dedications to the west is 35 feet. The applicant should be required to dedicate the additional right -of -A. vay. The existing roadway consists of a 32 foot wide asphalt concrete pavement that provides one 11 foot wide vehicular and one 5 foot wide pedestrian lane in each direction. The standard condition of approval for this type of development is to require one -half street improvements along the entire frontage. The applicant has requested that the improvements be deferred to the future when a Locg Improvement District is formed to improve a larger portion of SW Bull Mountain Road that would include the project frontage. The Engineering Department has reviewed the topographic constraints at the site and would suggest that an alternative sidewalk location may be justified to save the cedar HEARINGS OFFICER. - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 12 ., s. trees noted in the application, that are located at the easterly end of the site. The widening of the existing street can be accomplished without any unusual circumstances, except that a portion of the proposed sidewalk should be located in an easement on private property, to align with a grade compatible with the adjoining properties and the existing trees. As noted, there are power poles and overhead lines on both sides of the street, and the applicant should be required to place these facilities underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. The existing building is connected to the existing 8' public sanitary sewer in SW Bull Mountain Road and no changes are proposed. The sewer has sufficient capacity for the proposed addition. 3. STORM DRAIN The site slopes in a northeasterly direction to the 6" storm drain located in an easement on the adjoining "Shadow Hills" subdivision. The storm drain should be extended onto the site to a point located a minimum of 5 feet southerly of the northerly property line and a catch basin constructed to City standards. In addition, a storm drain easement should be dedicated to the City for access and maintenance of the storm drain. A .1' • The drainage from the additional impervious area created by the new construction should to be directed to a new on -e4te Swale, from the end of the existing on -site "daylight" storm drain, to the new catch basin. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Section 7.10b of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which the fee in -lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective develop ment. ", the fee may apply. It is our op iniot that this site p P Y p is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend that a fee in -lieu be required. 2. Compliance_ volt i Comprehensive. Plan Pow: HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94.0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 13 This proposed Conditional Use complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as follows: 1. Citizen Involvement. Policy 2.1 i 1 is satisfied as the applicant was required to hold a neighborhood meeting with nearby property owners, notice of the application amid public hearing on this item was provided to the Citizen i Involvement Team West Representative, to owners of property in the vicinity of the site and in a newspaper of general circulation. The site has also been posted with a sign which states that a land use development application is pending for this property. 2. 'Water Quality. Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant is paying a fee as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. 3, Public Facilities and Services. The conditional use complies with Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the serving Private Utility Companies and Public Agencies have been provided with copies of the proposed development application. Public facility services were provided in conjuction with the construction of the existing facility and are adequate to serve this proposal. Where services are substandard the applicant has been conditioned to upgrade those services. 4. _> nsp i .. This . complies .iii .1 and 8.1.3 because Tr�n ortationi This application corn lies with Policies 8 site i the public improvements to the public streets adjoining this site will be required to be consistent with the City of Tigard and Washington County road improvement standards. The street and access plans do not appear to raise any capacity concerns and will address safety concerns. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division concludes that the Conditional the general al Use request will promote t . Welfare ., will i .. y .,,. i..., decision . . with welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings, staff recommends APPROVAL of Conditional Use Permit CUP 94 -0009 subject to the following conditions: HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 14 • , .• ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR COMPLETION SHALL BE FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE ANDEKQIIT IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 639.4171. 1. Right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Bull Mountain Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to 33 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the proposed right-of-way centerline as approved by the Engineering Department. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Public Counter and the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department (639-4171). 2. Standard one-half street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the SW Bull Mountain frontage. Improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements, as approved by the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171). 3. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cot estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (39-4171), 4. The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and Transportation of Washington County, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Bull Mountain Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171). 5. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public storniwater drainage system or by an on-site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171). HEARINGS OFFICER. CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 15 4ao 'At t •••• .8 a LEGIBILIT-YSTRIP • 6. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties dovvnstream. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171). 7. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 8. The applicant shall place the existing overhead facilities underground or pay the fee in-lieu of tmdergrounding, 9 The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No 91-47. NOTE This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 10. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit prior to removal of any portions of the existing building. Staff Contact: knee Gaynor, Building Division (639-4171). 11. A tree removal permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. THE FOLLOWING CQI■IKLIC)1S_C$1139ULD RE REOUIRED. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 12. Al! site improvements shall be installed as per the approved site plan. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWAREDELHE POLL W10_1•1_03WIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THIS IS NOT ANLEICCL SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 944009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 16 . , a , a / - • a • s, l• ;1", R.egtiire a bond in an amount not grater than 100. percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL SHALL RE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea Assistant Planner APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd Senior Planner HEARINGS OFFICER. - CUP 94.0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL cauRca Page 17 • J e .• a t4 t - i s s,:- ti _ 1. Y ''.....;...1-'. s - s. .r x �' _ s 4,. `R t ......,-r....- •-,...,_--.......: F _ -f � � +i ty. T_ t.•.a .*s?. tx- s 1 vt .a C� i tf y �. y� -` ey i' - t t i • r _ _, y t. f `_ �' c LE®IiILii ` .ii.:''.. .y• .•v ' c't. `'� } l i4 _ s £ • �us { y fie. • i. .f 1 x • __ x. . • PLACE UNDER CITY OP TZGARD LOGO The fdllowing will be Considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer 00 Monday, 1995 at 7:00 PM at Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., T gard, Oregon. Both public oral and written te'timony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures Of the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter Precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed Precludes an appeal based or that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning DivIsien at 1'3125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Ot 97223, or by calling 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARINGS gatiDar.ONAL USE CUP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mounta n Road (ICTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an eXisting sanctuary, remodel cf an existing parish hall for use as handicapped adcessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday soheol wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CR/TERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.1060 18,108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 » its/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations' temporary uces and accessory structures. TT PUBLISH • • • 110 , 4 4: CITY OP TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s):CUP 94-0009 2. Name of Owner: St. Jamesscoalurch Name of Applicant: Same .1611•6.101•1110111■016.16611111611•MING "11:1111.11MMINIIMPIME 3. Address 11511 SW Bull Mountain Rd. City Tigard State OR Zip 97224 4. Address of Property: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 10BD tax lot 100 S. Request: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Zone: 6. Action; R-2 (Residential, 2 Units/acre) The R-2 toning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structUres. emommscurnammer torlimmormarol mnevuesta Approval as requested Approval With conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant and owner(s) X OwnerS of record within the required distance X. Affected governmental agencies 8. Pinal Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditionS can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City gall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. i .622211.1 Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in adcordande with 18.32,290(8) and section 18.32,10 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is giver and sent. The appeal may be sUbmitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315,00) and transcript costs (varies Up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal iE 3:30 p.m, 10, ggeStions: If you have any guestionS, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 635-4171, • • t. STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard • depose and Say: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ) ss. being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath (Please print) That I am a for The City of Tig rd Oregon. hat I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director - Tigard Planning Commission 77.0-Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "Au) was mailed to each named pergons at the addres' shown on the attached list marked exhibit '93" on the .....112 day of%I/glua.li said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as herot2 attached, was posted in oul appropriate bUlletin board on the day of i 19 ; and deposed in the United States Mail on the day of # 19M.--..# postage ptepaid. Prepared Notice Subsc ed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 19 Ohl A, ... ,i,.., ' .N:L.t.S.17,47,,,'"*. .2_, 2,, 4:,,..., ,.....,, • i OFFICIAL. SEAL ,to - DIANE M. JELOERPCS 1 NOTARY PUBLIC•ORVION COMMISSION NO, 00897? MY COMMISSION EXPIRE $EPT, /, 095 4% ••■"" 4, 9 9 U °tit 00 09 4,k&tikk2.47 ecAsee. day of NOT'- PUBLIC OF OR My Commi6sion Exp EAdot4 ft 41, VOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, ganUart.21_1225, AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CUP 94-0009 FILE TITLE: St, James Episcopal Church APPLICANT: St, James Episcopal Church 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 639-3002 OWNER: Same REQUEST: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped aCcessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. LOCATION: 11511 SW BUll Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18,100, 18,102, 18,1060 18,108, 18.150, 18.130 and 18,164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 Unit/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, 4 manufactured home, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures, THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OP CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30, ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING, THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIP1ED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST, PLEASE CALL 639-4171, Err* 356 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 ('DD TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO 't']8 HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY 014 THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC REARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY, THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION, IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER jultala2„1291, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN w •f • FOR A.T "LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. . INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVE THE [' GARD COMPREHENSIVE II REQUEST + r T FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE • APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED TJ'ON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY., ., AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT ''L COMMENTS RELATING TO TIE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED` r � + LETTER A TDOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OPFAILURE' THE �HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD TFIE DECISION MAKER AN 'OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO TEE LAND 't,SE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO BE OBTAINED FCR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN' DAYS PRIOR TO THE C THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COP'S CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER �TO� CONTACT PLANNER Will D' Andrea AT 63 9 -4 171i TxGARDTYHkLL�3I G 5SWtALLBLVD TIG ARD, OREGON 97223 1 1 M ti 43# 44•40 >\v 9 AR 16mli r rM �'a 2S11080-00100 ST JAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH • Box 23033 TIGARD e• 4• o• o• 4•• 4 o• o • 251108D -00300 OR 97223 PERRY, THEL'4A ZREUE 7R, 11710 SW WXLDWOOD ST TIGARD OR, 97224 644 13 2S110BD-0020 •.• •.r4e eaes •re•4• MORENO, HERBERT A " 14590 SW MCFARLAND BLVD .11GARD OR 97223 151 34C -1 119 2311080 -81400 ..................... !SAUSS a MARGARET A 11855 SW BEEF BEND RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S1108D -01500 ARTIS, VICKI BC 11670 SW DULL 1'N RD TIGARD OR 97223 oboes.. booasoe4ee44e4•e400e0 26110BD®01600 ... ..N•4••.•••ee• ANDERSON,, PHYLLIS N /ROGER F TRS 11777 s6a'QUEEN ELIZABETH #333 KING CITY OR 97224 251108.0 -02100 N0RGrART, RA1 DALL 11550 SW BULL TIGARD 4 • O • R 1& STACK L MO UNTAIN RD OR 97224 28110BB- 00100 JUSTICE, JAN/CE T 11920 SW GAARDE TIGARD • OR 97223 251108A -02400 Y WHITE, GA M & EYUN 0 1 IMAM DR BEAVERTON OR 97005 251110- 02500 BUTCHER, CHRISTINE M 14550 Ski MCF& LAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 2S110BA -02600 BURBACX, DARRtELL R AND SHIRLEY L 14520 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 25110B11 02700 SMITH, }1ARLEY J & CAROL A 14500 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 25110BA'02600 FELLER, BOB M & SUSAN t 11650 SW CLOUT CT TIGARD OR 97223 25110RA.,02900 e 4 DOUGHERTY, DAVID LNLYNES D 1/590 SW CLOUD COURT 223 OR 97' TIGARD 4 . '44.4 2S110BA- 03000 s. 4e•ee4••4•• RENECKER, STANLEY G & LAURIE J 11550 CRUD CT TIGARD OR 97223 2 110BA-03100 4•e444.4.s •4" LOPER, ROBERT E AND JULLE A 11530 SW CLOUT! CT TIGARD OR 97224 2S1108*- 03200 SOMENSEN ALLEN C AND CATHIE A 11515 SN`CLOUD COURT TIGARD OR 97223 251103A- -04900 y4.. 444.014444.:4 FARMER A a & BETTE JEAN 14495 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 2S11013A-05000 4•444444 FINSti1 ' j MARK A & GEORGIA L 14535 MC 'ARLAND TIGARD OR 97223 O•444 0 26110B A...05100 4,eewe110• DICEY, NBNNETH A AND ELLEN C 7691 RAINBOW DR. CUPERTINO 4o•ea's•i• 2s1101,4r°'01' aw•i.•eei.aNt . • • 1 1 , *REDBRICK 4 ESTATE OF 11777 $W QUEEN ELIZABETH #333 KING CITY OA 97224 CA 95014 28110 '0A400 . aWaea43 S aa.eee ANDERSON, PHYLLIS mow= W Tits 11777 SW OMEN ELIZABETH #333 RING CITY OR 97224. 28110AC41600 a aaae•.o a.ei.eeuee• CRANE, F'R,EDRIC= T AND NELDA 11455 SW BUtL MT RD TIGARD OR '97224 2S110At..02600 •e•O•aaaaa• OO.O a .aa. BECK, PATRICK C 1 PAULINE R 14425 SW 114TO TIGARD OR 9/223 28310A5� •02800 HUG i'S, ZONA► +G& 14355 SW 114TR AVE TIGARD .e. OR 97223 ST +JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH 11511 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97224 2$110A0-01504 Gooes.i..e.a 4 CRANE, FREDRICK T NELDA IL 11455 SW BULL MTN Rid TIGARD OR 97223. 28110R1842509 06 • .. HAMPTON, HILL a BARBARA A 14465 SW 114TE AVE TIGARD OR 97224 dl�rar.iaa.a 2811OA 3' 02700 ........ P i, LAN R NG YEN PHUONG BIt ' 14365 SW 114TH AVE T1CAR0 OR '97224 LEGIBILITY STRIP 25110BD-30100 646e. . o..,e4, ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH PO BOX 23033 TIGARD 25110BD-00300 OR 97223 PERRY, THELMA IRENE TR 11710 SW WILDWOOD ST TIGARD OR 97224 2S11OBD-01400 • 2S110BD0020 4. edoiloioe.404.••••••64• MORENO, HERBERT A 14590 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 444 181 340-13 119 ..... KAUSS, MARGARET A 11555 SW BEEF BEND AD TIGARD OR 97224 2S1108/P-01600 4 . 44 . 44 . 4.6444644444o ANDERSON, PHYLLIS M/ROGER F TRS 11777 SW QUEEN ELIZABETH #333 KING CITY OA 07224 2S1108B-00100 46444 JUSTICE, JANICE T 11920 SW GAARDE TIGARD OR 97223 2S110BA.i02500 BUTCHER, CHRISTINE M 14550 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 281108&.02700 44444444'f SMIM HAVJEY J & CAROL A 14500 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 0 •4444 281108A-02900 • 46444,64 DOUGHERTY, DAVID L/LYNNE D 11580 SW CLOUD COURT TIGARD OR 97223 281108A-E03100 4' -6-44464464466 LOPER, ROBERT E AND JULLE A 11530 SW CLOUD dT TIGARD OR 01224 281108A-04900 0444 'AMER, A B & BETTE JEAN 14495 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 �j��S�.�I 4 o 2S1108D-000 .6464 ARTXS, VICKI K 11670 SW BULL MTN RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S110B042100 •••••••••• . 604.4.44. NORGART, RANDALL E & STACEY L 11550 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD TIGARD OR 97224 281108A...02400 .46446464644444 WHITE, GARY H & HYUN 0 1 BOWERMAN DR BEAVERTON OR 97005 2S1108Ae.02600 BURBACK, DARRELL R AND SHIRLEY L 14520 SW MCFARLAND BLVD TIGARD OR 97224 4 6 4 4 4 4 6 2S110BA-'02500 •••••••••••••••••••• • KELLER, BOB M & SUSAN D 11650 SW CLOUT CT TIGARD OR 07223 28110BA-03000 444464644464446444444 RENECKER, STANLEY G & LAURIE J 11550 CLOUD CT TIGARD OR 97223 28110BA.-03200 • 6 4 • 614444 • • • • 44 4114 SORRENSEN ALLEN C AND CATHIE A 11515 SW CLOUD &WM, /CAE b OR 97223 2S1109A-05000 4 4 • 4 4 4 4 • 4 4 4 I 4 6 lo Ionian, MARK A & GEORGIA L 14535 MCFARLAND TIGVID OR 97223 , a LEGIBH JrY STRIP 2S11OBA •05100 1a aaa •��•e ".- •a.••�...•a DICKEY, KENNETH A AND ELLEN C 7691 RAINBOW DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 2S11OAC- 401400 .a ♦•r66 ♦•a asiii • ANDERSON, PHYLLIS H /ROGER V TRS 11777 SW QUEEN ELIZABETH #333 KING CITY OR 97224 2S110A6.01600 ..•se••.• •aaa66u••6a CRANE, FREDRICKT AND NELDA 11455 SW BULL MT AD TIGARD OR 37224 28110AB .'02600 s..••o•8abbi6.6.68 44 BECK, PATRICK C & PAULINE R 14425 SW 1.14TH TIGARD OR 97223 2S110AB -02800 HUGUS, ZONA GAY 14355 SW 114TH AVE TIGARD a 4 6 8 a r 0 o a W• a a a b OR 97223 2S110AC401304 • 4. 3a*•4• O. •�4 ANDEROON, FREDERICK A ESTATE OF 11777 SW QUEEN ELIZABETH #333 KING CITY OR 97224 2S110AC4..500 i �••••� CRANE, FREDRICK T NELDA L 11455 SW BULL MTN RU TIGARD 9H 97223 as 28110AB- 02500 •••a.aaa.aa•aa••r•••• HAMPTON, HILL E BARBARA A 14465 SW 114TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 25110.$.02700 644 PRAM, LAN N NGUYEN, PHUGHG BICH 14365 SW 114TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 7 • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION VILE NO: CUP 94-0009 FILE TITLE: St. James Episcopal Church APPLICANT: St. James Episcopal Church OWNER: Same 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sactuary, reModol of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped acessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story Parish Hall / Sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, 18.164. LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road. (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100) ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units per acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family detached residential, public support facilities, residential treatment home, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, and accessory structures. CIT: West CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Joe Koszarek PHONE NUMBER: 684-8500 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION ,COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OV HEARING: TEA T/M8:7:00 CITY COUNCIL ATTACHMENTS VICINITY MAP X NARRATIVE SITE PLAN DATE OF HEAPING: TIME:7:30 STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea - 639-4171 j. X LANDSCAPING PLAN X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN OTHER:GRADING PLAN PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled For Planning Commission meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 323 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and Qualified bilingual interpreters. •A SITIC9 these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER 1/23/96 PAGE t OF 2 a • •,*••• :4" .• _ II ` • .� > _ - �. � '►- ` a R !�` ' a _ Y Y k _ _ - } ra tite ` f • • , r • s l .Q s '^'.itL ♦ Lk LEGIBILITY STRIP t " x s s• a - .... `- �'�r *.. 't. •.. - .c= ..,. P r CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER JANUARY 23, 1995 700 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 CONDITIONAL USE UP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISC.PAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD; tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.150, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: 13-2 (Resideniial, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. 2.2 CONDITIONAL USE CUP 94-0010 INTERFAITH OUTREACH LOCATION: 8815 SW O'Mara Street (WCTM 251 2DB, tax lot 500). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the operation of a severe weather horneleatshelter within • the basement of the Tigard Senior Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102018.106, 18.1081 18.130, and 18,164, „ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) The R-12 zone allows single family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support services, family day care, home occupations; temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. 3, OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURN1VIENT 'WARD HEARI1408 OFFICER - 1/23/98 4. t 2. S. • • ....,;41.1.#* . • LEG BI JTY STRIP 4 , ; • • ... • •;. RECEIVED PLANNING' JUN 1 5 1995 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE AND BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076 • (503) 526-2469 • FAX 526-2538 olsxmassoitimar June 13, 1995 -- John McL Middleton ZTec Engineers 3737 N.J. 8th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97202 Re: improvements to St. lames gpiscord Church 11511 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Dear Mr. Middleton: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of tho Uniform Fire Code (UPC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Hydrant locations for the above captioned property, is acceptable by this department. Distances around the building from the hydrants are slightly over extended, however, they will be acceptable as shown. This department 4. would adviae locating an additional fire hydrant adjacent the new handicap ramp and space at the north end of the parking lot on the inward bound lane of travel. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2502. Sincerely, Gene Birchill, DFM Plans Examiner GB:kW cc: Lahe BroWn Architect/Planner 510 N.W. Third Portland; Oregon 97209 Tigard Planning Department Tigard buildiny Department "Iivokkini" Smoke Detectors SaVC Lives 44- • A 4 , AGENDA ITEM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Saint James Episcopal Church to allow the addition of approxirnattly 10,190 square feet to an existing church facility, CASE: SUMMARY: I. SUMMARY O F THE REQUEST Conditional Use Permit CUP 94 -0009 STAFF REPORT CUP 94-0009 A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and addition of a two story Parish Hall /Sunday School wing to an existing church building: The total area of building to be added is 10,190 square feet, to be removed is 1,895 square feet, for a net total facility area increase of 8,295 square feet. APPLICANT: St, James Episcopal Church 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road T? garb, OR 97224 OWNER: Same COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density ZONING DESIGNATION: R -2 (Residential, 2 units per acre). LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100), APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18,106, 18.108, 18,130, 18,150, and 18.164, Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,1,1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8,1.1, and 8,1.3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditions, IL SITE AND VICINITY INFORMATION HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page k.: ]around Information: The subject site was annexed into the City of Tigard in 1978. No other development applications were found to have been submitted for this site. B. Site Information and Pro osal Descri t% The subject site is developed with a Sanctuary, office and classroom facility, The parking area is accessible from two driveways on SW Bull Mountain Road. The parking area contains 67 parking spaces. A play area is located to the north of the building. The site slopes to the north and east. The development proposal consists of the addition of an acolytes preparation room al, ' small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and addition of a two story Parish Hall /Sunday School wing to an existing church building. The total area of building t be added is 10,190 square feet, to be removed is 1,895 square feet, for a net total facility area increase of 8,295 square feet. C. Vicinittlnformaton The 2,4 acre site is surrounded on the north, east and west by properties which are zoned R -2 (Residential, 2 units per acre). The properties to the south are zoned R -25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) and R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre), Most of the surrounding properties are developed with single family residences. III APPLICA114JE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Cor n ainity, Development Code: 1. Chapter .18.46.040 lists Religious Assembly as a Conditional Use in the Ru2 zone, 2, Chapter 18,130,040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use 1) The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 940009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 2 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features, 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as rttodified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section, 18,120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan, 3, Section 18,130.150(C)(101 contains the following additional Conditional Use criteria for Religious Assembly and Accessory Uses: a, Lot Size: Minhnum lot size shall be 20,00 square feet; b. Setbacks: I. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet. IL On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meet visual clearance areas (Chapter 18.102); ilL The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; • iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; and v. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. 4, Section. 18,46.050 (R-2 Zone) states that except as otherwise provided lii Chapter 18.98, no building in an R.-2 zone shall exceed 30 feet in height, HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page. 3 5. Section 18.98 (Building Height Liin , :ions: Exceptions) states that projections such as spires, domes and other similiar objects not used for human occupancy are not subject to the building height limitations. 6. Section 18.100 contains standards for landscaping and screening. a. Section ,18.100,015, requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan, and that the approval standards are the applicable standards contained in Section 18.100 and which are listed below: b. Section 18,100.030 (Street Trees) states that all development projects fronting on a public, private street, or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18,100.035. Section 18.100,035(A) requires that landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in subsection 18.100.035(B), Section 18.100.035(B) requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium, or large). c. Section 18,100.110) (Screening of Parking and Loading Areas) requires the screening of parking and loading areas, Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect, The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 7. Section 18,102 i020 (Visual Clearance) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway, A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or pernnanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height, T he code 'MA RIM I'S OFFICER CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMBS EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 4 provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. 8. Section 18.06 (Off Street Parking and Loading) contains standards for parking and loading. a. Section 18,1 0.1)11,4), (Parking) requires 1 space for every 3 fixed seats or every 6 feet of bench length in the assembly area or every 50 square feet of floor area in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever is greater. Section 1 F.106.050(li ) requires that artificial lighting on all off - street parking facilities shall be designed to deflect all light so as not to create a hazard to the public use of any road or street. c, The Americans with Disabilities Act ALAI, which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 3 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. d. Section 18.106.020(P) (Bicycle Parking) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development, Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Section 18.108,080 (Access and Circulation - Minimum Requirements) requires that uses which provide less than 100 parking spaces provide a minimum of one accesss with a width of 30 feet. The t iri mum pavement width shall be 24 feet. In addition, section ,18.120.1.80. (A).(11101 requires that circulation patterns within a development be designed to accomodate emergency vehicles. 10. Section 18.1C3.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94.00r 9 ST. JABS EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 11. Section 18.11�1.13r,A) (Signs) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the R }3.5 zone, 12. Chapter 18.150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ,, ;;und on undeveloped residential land. A permit for tree removal must present rationale which complies with specified criteria in order to obtain approval. 13, Chapter 18.164 contains standards for streets and utilities. a. Section J8,164.01101 requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 1$.164130(El requires Major Collector streets to have a mi 4. Policy 7,3.1 provides the City will coordinate water services with water districts. 5. Policy 7.4.4 requires all new development to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. 6. Policy 8.1.1 provides the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 7. Policy 8.1,3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; b. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; c, The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, sidewalks to City standards within the development. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided commems which are summarized in the analysis of Section 18.164 below. • 2, The Unified Sewerage Agency states that a water quality facility shall be required, an erosion control permit is required and the storm system to connect to public system, 3, Washington County Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and hi, the following comments: HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Peige , ..1° '• 6 CO 4 Resolution and Order 86 -95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to perform a preliminary sight distance for this project, review because of the current work load. Therefore, the applicant will e ct be re uired to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate ats s i bht distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road, REQUIRED CONDITION$ OF APPRCIVAL ... I1J014. TO , FINAL . PLIQYAIL4 JIL ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT B CITY OF TIGAR I. Submit to Land Development Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy Storae/`Carolyn Cook, 648- 8161): a, Completed "Design Caption" form. b, $750,00 Administration Deposit. c. Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered .. professional engineer at the access point ► ' W Bull Mountant. Road. Provide a detailed list of what improvements are necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance. . i i. • i Deposit . . i _. by NOTE: Any portion ortion of the Administration ' not use Washington County for plan approval, field inspections, and contract administration will be returned to the applicant. If at any time during the project, the County's costs are higher than the amount deposited, Washington County will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs, d, Two (2) complete g Vets of com lete en ineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements 1. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, H.E . A.IUNOS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES PISCOPAL CHURCH Page YID 2: Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County standards in location as the existing access points.. 3. Improvements within the right -of -way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain in a Road access point, 4. Provide adequate roadway drainage along 6W Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the follewng: a, Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I,A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone /Carolyn Coals, 648- 8761,) of Land Development Services will send the required forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans. b. Provide vidence that the documents required by condition LC have been recorded. 3. The follnwing documents shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: a. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 33 feet front centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. Provide a one -foot non- access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points. NOTE: Washington County Survey Division OJamil Iamawal 693 4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative, I EA, JS OFFICER - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page B. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY 1, The road improvements required in by conditions I.A.4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County, 2, Provide certification of adequate sight distance hi accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements. 4. General Telephone and Electronics states that the ownershall coordinate telephone facility rearrangement, if any, with GTE Northwest incorporated. 5. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division, City of Tigard Building Department, Tigard Water Department, Tigard Police Department, Tigard Water District, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Portland General Electric have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. V. EVALUATION 01P REQUEST 1, Compliance with Coinrntirjityaeyslo Code. 4 Section 18.130,040: The construction of a church in an R-2 zone requires a Conditional Use approval. This proposal is consistent with the applicdle approval standards. As indicated on the site plan, the site will provide adequate area for the proposed expansion. Site characteristics are suitable for the expansion as the site contains adequate area and does not contain physical constraints. Adequate public facilities are present and currently serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of approval. Compliance with the applicable zoning district requirements, Conditional Use review and Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process. Section 18.130.150(C)(10) is satisfied. The subject site is approximately 2,4 acres, well in excess of the minimum 20,000 square foot lot area. As indicated on the site plan, the building is in compliance with setback standards. Section 18.46, The applicant is proposing to expand an existing church facility. A church is classified in code section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Religious Assembly. HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CI-Ii RCH Page 10 Code Section 18.46.040 allows Religious Assembly as a Conditional use, As indicated on the site plan, all setbacks are satisfied. The proposed structures are in compliance with height limitations, The conditional use criteria for a church also requires increased setbacks for buildings, over 45 feet in height. This criteria is not applicable as the proposed additions are not greater than 45 feet in height. Section 18,100.015. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of trees and shrubs, and as addressed in the applicable sections below. Section 18.100.030. This requirement shall be satisfied as the site plan shows the addition of two new street trees. Section 18.100.110(.�). The preliminary plan indicates the provision of 67 parking spaces. Based on the ratio of one tree per seven spaces, the applicant is required to p rovide approximately 10 parking lot trees. The site plan shows 11 parking lot trees, located within the existing landscaped area. Existing landscaping screens the parking lot from view, thereby satisfying the screening requirement. Section ,18._102.020. As shown on the site plan, the vision clearance requirements are satisfied. Section 18.106:030 B 8 . The proposal does not include increasing the area of the sanctuary, therefore this application will not require the addition of required parking spaces. The applicant states that the sanctuary provides twenty- eight, 10 foot pews, requiring parking spaces. The site plan shows the provision of 67 parking sp s es, spaces. .. site 47 arkin sac a parking spaces, The site plan also indicates the provision of 3 handicapped accessabl p g p , satisfying ADA requirements, Section 18.106,050(i% The preliminary site plan shows the location of lighting fixtures, satisfying this requirement. Section 18.106.020 Section P .Based on the ratio of 1 bicycle rack per 15 vehicular spaces � p.., p this site requires 4 bicycce parking spaces. The site plan shows the provision of S bicycle parking spaces, thereby satisfying this criteria. Section 18.108.080. This section is satisfied as the plan provides for two, 24 foot access drives. HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page • .• 1••• • .,". ea Section 18.108.050LAI. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of a walkway connecting the front entrance of the building with the sidewalk along SW Bull Mountain Road, thereby satisfying this requirement Section j1.1.1413,M. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Section 18.150. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18,164.030 (Streets), 18,164.090 (Sanitary Sewer) and 18.164,100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. STREETS: The existing parking lot for the church currently has two one-way driveways that connect to SW Bull Mountain Road, a Major Collector street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan, SW Bull Mountain Road is also a Washington County road, No change is proposed to the orisite driveway system. The existing right-of-way for SW Bull Mountain Road, as measured from the centerline of street, is 20 feet wide, The right-of-way required to match the existing dedications to the west is 35 feet. The applicant should be required to dedicate the additional right-of-way. The existing roadway consists of a 32 foot wide asphalt concrete pavement that provides one 11 foot wide vehicular and one 5 foot wide pedestrian lane in each direction. The standard condition of approval for this type of development is to 4 require one-half street improvements along the entire frontage. The applicant has requested that the improvements be deferred to the future when a Local Improvement District is formed to improve a larger portion of SW Bull Mountain Road that would include the project frontage, The Engineering Deparment has reviewed the topographic constraints at the site and would suggest that an alternative sidewalk location may bo justified to save the cedar HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 94-0009 ST, JAME S EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 12 S. trees noted in the application, that are located at the easterly end of the site. The widening of the existing street can be accomplished without any unusual circumstances, except that a portion of the proposed sidewalk should be located in an easement on private property, to align with a grade compatible with the adjoining properties and the existing trees. As noted, there are power poles and overhead lines on both sides of the street, and the applicant should be required to place these facilities underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. The existing building is connected to the existing 8" public sanitary sewer in SW Bull Mountain Road and no changes are proposed. The sewer has sufficient capacity for the proposed addition. 3. STORM DRAIN Y 'r The site slopes in a northeasterly direction to the 6 tt , storm drain located in an easement - - on the adjoining "Shadow Hills" subdivision. The storm drain should be extended onto the site to a point located a minimum of 5 feet southerly of the northerly property line and a catch basin constructed to City standards. In addition, a storm drain easement should be dedicated to the City for access and maintenance of the storm drain. The drainage from the additional impervious area created by the new construction should to be directed to a new on -site swale from the end of the existing on -site "daylight" storm drain, to the new catch basin. The Unified. Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Section 7,10b of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which the fee in -lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective development. ", the fee may apply, It is our opinion that this site is consistent with this criteria; and we recommend that a fee in- lieu be required. 2. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies: HEARINGS OF I•r ICJ3R - CUP 94 -0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 13 This proposed Conditional Use complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as follows: 1. Citizen Involve ,Lt. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied as the applicant was required to hold a neighborhood meeting with nearby property owners, notice of the application and public hearing on this item was provided to the Citizen Involvement Team West Representative, to owners of property in the vicinity of the site and in a newspaper of general circulation. The site has also been posted with a sign which states that a land use development application is pending for this property. 2. Water uali Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant is paying a fee as established under the guidelines of Unified. Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. 3, Public Facilities and Services. The conditional use complies with Policies 7,1,2, 73.1, and 7.4.4 because the serving Private Utility Companies and Public Agencies have been provided with copies of the proposed development application, Public facility services were provided in conjuction with the construction of the existing facility and are adequate to serve this proposal. Where services are substandard the applicant has been conditioned to upgrade those services. 4, Trails ortation+ This application complies with Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the public improvements to the public streets adjoining this site will be required to be consistent with the City of Tigard and Washington County toad improvement standards. The street and access plans do not appear to raise any capacity concerns and will address safety concerns. VL CONCLUSION AND Rt COMMENDATION The Plainrin g Division concludes that the Conditional Use request will promote the general will ... ... . .. . ►... .. injurious .. . g welfare of the City and i not be significantly detrimental `nor toi surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws, ill iecognition of the findings, staff recommends APPROVAL of Conditional Use Permit CUP 94 -0009 subject to the following conditions: I- EARINGS OFFICER CUP 94.0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 14 ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR COMPLET,.ON SHALL BE CONDITIONS FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR. TO THE ISSUANCE OI BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MICANDERSON IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 639.4171. 1, Right -of -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Bull Mountain Y .Jad frontage to increase the right -of -way to 35 feet from centerline The description shall be tied to the proposed right -of -way centerline as approved by the Engineering Department, The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Public Counter and the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department (639 - 4171). Standard one-half street improvements, including concrete si e walk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the SW Bull Mountain frontage, Improvements shall conforin to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements, as approved by the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639 - 4171), 3, Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to ant drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639 - 4171), 4Y The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and Transportation of g County, p within Y , . of Washington t✓oun , to perform wont the right-of-way o1 S Bull Moui,tain Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639.4171), 5, The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system or by an on -site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property, STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 = 4171), HEARINGS OFFICER CttP .I9 �I'I', JAMES EPISCOPAL CFTURCH Page .x. 6, The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage Toff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream, STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171). 7. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94 -18. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. The applican } shall place the existing overhead facilities underground or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. pp pay established under the guidelines of Unified. The a lica�it shall _ a the fees as esta ` r NOTE: This is a two part fee Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No, S 1 47. p which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements is development which increases the p p , t_ menu which �s for that portion of the , impervious area within the public right-of-way, The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot, pp , , i permit prior ,,, any portions of ihe The applicant shall obtain a demolition erm�t r�ory to removal of an portion existing building, Staff Contact: Jerree Gaynor, Building Division (639- 4171). 11. A tree removal permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIf�►I S� Sf OULI BE REQUIRED PRIO.1L TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 12. All site improvements shall be installed as per the approved site plan. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE' THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST._ 1, SECTION 18,120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: HEARINGS OFFICER - CUP 940009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH Page 16 �-a Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the typtoved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDAEDS. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION, PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea Assiptant Planner APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd Senior Planner DATE HEARINGS OFFICER. - CUP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURclit Page 17 PROPERTY LOCATION: Address: Tax Map & Tax Lot: NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: CCeMIUUMENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Minimum lot width: ft. ;I-- Setbacks: front ...2110.__ ft. Gide it. garage ft. corner__ ft. Maximum site coverage: aitiimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: Maximum building height: ft. CSAIRPERSON: PHONE: ADDITIONAL LOT DIMRNSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ma lot frontag : 25 feet u** a-10E Le created through the minor: land partition precest . ated at part of a partition mist have a adidUmma of' 15 feet otrontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to .„. • ratio of 2.5 to 1. JUT PROMISIONS .'. Wilding IlatiOtt EitUeptlit.at (Coda Section a tiotaistettliAltratisti itthito ttay be hailt- a-I:tight-Of 151Ettt 1, a thoutfl FM - :UAW area to. site te■ 1 ULU Page 1 PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for thia type of uae: Cpeconderr-uve-reqtrtred-parkring: No more than Wee of required apacea may be deaignated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking atalla shall be dimenaioned aa follows: - Standard parking apace dimensions: -9-offt. :oeV/y - Compact parking apace dimenaiona:41.4-4ta-71-16-ft. Ei17 iq Disabled parking: All parking area shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled ;cornea parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, axe mandated by the Americana with Diaabilitiea Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign ehall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for civic, non-reaidential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 25 or more raeking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected frost automobile traffic and in Convenient locations. Bicycle parking apacea shall be provided on the basis of one apace for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. Al). driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: 44.-feet Maximum access widths 3v'ircaootpu ase pa,,16A60,4 cupla Pedeatrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areaa, outdoor common areas, and public aidewalks and streets. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall inclUde special design features which effectively screed the parking lot areas from view. Theca", design features may include the Use of landacaped berms, decorative walls, and raised plantera. Lor detailed information on design sequireMents for parking areas and accesaea, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.100 and 180108. ,--a=7CLEAR %TIMM ARBA The City requires that clear cvlation areas he 101.11.0.tatead bobtween three and eight feet in height at roadidrixesay, zooedirailroi d. and rosaroad intersections. The size of the requited clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional alauseification. 37 B\)U i'/Crd Page 2 • 4 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adveree not ee or visual impact° between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped duffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture ef deciduous and einergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance betT;reen vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may ratio be required g these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may pay be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes my be found in Code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along. east boundary ft. along south boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along ft. along west boundary ---rmiumm TREES Street trees are required for all developmente fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public sight-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right, 4-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least uwo inches when measured four feet above grade. street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. StGNS Sign permi,ta snot be obtained pacer to installation (,,b f any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guideline's for Sian Perstitte handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond (ode standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Illearinge Officer. . • SENSITIVE LARDS . ,• • • • r • • " Code Chapter 1a.84 priamides =pi:Lotions, for which are poteittially :,...• natural drainagewayse Acetland aroma, on sit...-Tfts in emcees of 25 pescuste. or #,:.t. • •_ .• unsuitable for development due to *avian within the 100-year flacedgain, . on unstable gratin& .,:-Sta.ff will attempt . tgai.• prellialnarily !..:14entiLfy - .,..:;-1:t:. - sennitive lands areas at the tin.ka-application conference based on .airailabbi ....-;;I:. information- WifaVgai'the.....1221309 ponds areas and their :. . ,. , 4.83 the ility_gf_tit_te mp..,,,....,2.11.1c '...:••:* as 2tiLtelant dufinitions of sensitive ...g ,.. at . siesta ndicated • ' plailEi submitted with the denel. t aggLicatiorem, • - . • :;.,,I.• Page 3 �f! • LEGIBILITY STRIP' Chapter 1f3. S4 also provides regulations for the twee protections or modification of sensitive lands areas. In moot under,. dt .. Rio a of Cie year floodplain asreae to the City for opeax retqul.ared as a condition of the approval of a develrpuaefnt application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS 10•MINIr PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Bearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Caamnis ®ion. Public hearing before the Planning Ccamission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An aadditional. public hearing shall be held by the City Council APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications muat be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at t counter at City, Ball. PLEASE NOTE: the Community Development Dew of f at the counter without A l.icaL• ions . +sbmitted _ by sari]. or � Applications submitted plaxuai.na Din .lion_ aac-v t ya.sg_ ,...be wined App' using with the after 4.30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for pr following week's applications. on ®' .].l be accepted after, 3� O M. on _ Frida heir ._ days.. -. � , ,tte *ith an _aosli�►.:ation �sLa .l be folded 7CN ADVANCE to 8.5 btj. l3A� °"' . . , . ,... inches. One 8.5 inch b 11 inch ma of a i�a eed re shoal submitted for attachment to the staff z.• or administrative _ dec ..lion. Application '1. unfolded. 2!tm_pia The planning D .v etios. avid Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review 8cati n and � determine ne Nether an application ie of the aprpl� i� an applicant if-y' C� aplete within 10 Gays of the counter submittal. Staff will applicant i f additional information Oradditional copies of the submitted materials are needed. .r public wing will typically occur days after an application ,is accepted as being The 45 60 decision complete by the Planning Apiplications ilovolving,difficult or paxtracted � review by other jurisdictions may y tam additional time i°'g�.i t taa from the Planning staff are issued Seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A•10 day public appeal Efwl to s all use decisi Tbia pre-appacatiOn conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Cemaunity Development Code requirements applicable to the poteatial development of a particular sites and to allow the City staff and proapective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting developmiutt of the site. the conference and notate p_a.nn t. cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that samba, apply to the develc3pekent of your site plan. Failure) of the ataff to provide information required by the Code ahalt not conatitute a waiver of the applicable standarda or requiremente. It is recommended that a proapective applicant either obta,4)1 and read the Community Development Code Or auk any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Mother pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than mix months after this pre.-app' cation conference, unless the second ,r^onferende is deemed winecessars by the Planning Page S • '`iii j I.y.. J .. .i• Y y t�1�.'V 1 5, PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - .application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable compreheneive Plan policies and ordin, �i a provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to coaawenc on specific concerns; and (3 ) To review the Land Use application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent Of nece nary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision arming authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following momenta are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of develop: ant approval for your proposed project. nist_it-of-wa _ dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the publics 1) to increase abutting public rights -of- ay to the ultimate functional street classification ri AAL1114.,A_ jjacIlEmeL The nearest sanitary sewer line to thie; is a(n) _inch line which is located in ..,,g,gLeSaNagi___06,16 ..........- The proposed development must be connected to a eanitamr sewer. It La the developer's r. "...oneibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development 0 i * a Water Sunniv: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639-1554) os..be-Oleeetatn Araktleley-Water-Dtstrt.06--(Tiververe.64,24.4.5-11) provides public water Rev:rice in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Reece° District (Contact: Gene BLrchill, 645-8533) provides fire protection services' within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regardirg the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, er other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: storm sewer japrovement STORMWATER QUALITY r FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has establiehed, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-eite water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a iacility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may paid or a facility shall be constructed. „WA,/ ,e4 .00 TRAFFIC TIOACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a coanty-mide Traffic Impact Pee (TIP) ordinance. The Traffic Impact lea program COlUetIFS fees from new development based on the development4s projected impact upon the City's transportation eLiratm. The applicant 'shall be required to pay a fee based. upon the umber of triiss high aresprojected to result from the proposed develLopmen. The calculation of the TIP La based on the proposed use o2 the land, the size of the .Piroject,.. and a general 'Use based fee cateory. limited ,.„.TIP a be calcu ted t the rt • • f be r'4tiesuatee, In cirououttances, payment.:of.the'TIP may be. ailoWed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit .Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible when.the Trio is grreatee than $ ,000.00. • -; PP/77010 .14 el2a!IP: .14 rir":. Page 7 ""':: 7CO3, =mei OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a pablio right- of-ray, or shall Tee until the applicant has obtained a street opeAing pelemit from the Engineering Depaxtment. VINISHED FLOOR EL 1X5 AU projects that reqUire a grading plan also ire flat the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. Thin floor plain shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY ENGINEERING nrvxSION PRONE: 619 -417l RP p rpnOn eicuxo r "A" APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Ciowmission • $235.00 . costs Planning Commiszion/tear s Off. to Council . $15.00 a transcript BLASTING PERMITS . $125.00 COMPREMENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only, or both $675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review $365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS OISiOR C oneRtalt orsai icr $ 80.00 RUNE OCCUPATION Driigi al- Peettit $ 50.00 `" '� •Renecaa.�. $ 10 .0 ' INTERPRETATION OF COtaiuurne DEVELOPLIENT CODE . . .. $ 55.00 by deity Development Department LAND PARTI''TION Residential and ton-residential $235.00 LOT LIME ADJUS T . . $A.00 0.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Concepttial and detailed plan review' $500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain $520.00 Wetlands/Steep slopes /Drainageway $235.00 SIC1 CODE EXcEPTIouS $230.00 SIGN PERMIT + 0 -24 sq. ft. $ 10.,+10 24 -100 sq. ft. . . . . . $ 25.00 100 + sq. ft $ 35.00 Temporary signs $ 10.00 each sign SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 $ 80.00 $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . $1 55..00 $ 100,000 - $499,999 $315.00 $ 500,000.- $999,999 . . .. . . $415.00 $1,000,000 or'more $520.00 + $1 per $10,000 over $1 million not to exceed 1;2000. SUBDIVISION PREGH¢NY PLAT $4.00 + $5 /lot Subdivision Variance., if needed .. . . .. W ., • $105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director' Decision $ 50.00 Special e a ptiontMon -F of it . . - . .. ..d . . a 641L.•E REMOVAL L t"GiVmrI. .. . • w . a • .s • s . •. a M. . . $ �"' VAR/MICE Administrative . . . $00.00 " Sign Code . w . .a . . .i . a . . .. . . e . . $2304.00 %ONE E ii WE S • • ,• +. • + , • Less than 10 acres $520.00 r'r. 10 acres or More $ 00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESsuM .. h %s than 10 acres y 10 ActOS or scare ZONE ORO ate, $310.00 f,: +•* • ' • JOINT APE actrriOU erANNICVC FEE ';.'. . .; ;?.i. . ` . .,.. . 100% of highest p :4'.: s ir. fee plat 10% of all addition 1 plaBming fees related to the proposal. •`+ bx'/[test.kst CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and 'submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your applioation. See your app cation for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. ITEMS TO BE easIc MATERIALS ,INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) 8) Owner's signature/written authorization Cl Title transfer instrumev•t E) Plot or sit(plan F) Applicant's statement (H) Filing fee (1 _,Eg5 PlC SCI461)067 MATERIALS A) • Site information showilm (No. VI 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions (-3 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or S ft for grades > (4.4 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds C4 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including:, a) Floodplain areas ( 3 b) Slopes in excess of 25% C 3 c) Unstable ground ( I d) &peas with high seasonal water table ( 3 e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential C 3 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils (3 6) Location of resource ,areas as shown on the Comprehensive Hinventory tip i incluiing: a) Milaife habitats t 3 b) Wetlands • ( 3 . Other site features: a) Rock oUtcroppings .0 ( 3 4 b) Trees uith 66 + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level, .. (11-4 0) tacation of existing'. structures and their MOS .. 9) Location and type *eon and off-site noise sources urn 10) Location of existinwutilities and easements. *.. 11) Location of eitisting::!ded icated right-of-mays!:.* , ' ' . (Pr '. rt.l.. . , : ... .. .-1 . ,,,. §ikepettplailli...mhoid ''::: (No/ of copiris jaiii: . • • ' IC 3 '''..':I ' 1) The proposedr,site andsurrounding properties1.-:, ..J,-...!tr.$.. 2) Contour-line intei-valilqi4: . .• ".. • ,,oi‘, , ° -: . ' . td-ri," .. ' 3) The loczAtion, dir;en'sions .and names of all:". i a) ExistingA platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoiraing . .1.' ;a,: • .• • ...4. .e 0 properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. • [� r` c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ 3 4) The location and dimension of a) Entrances and exits on the site (L''''' b) Parking and circulation areas r c) Loading and services areas (4.4"*" d) PedestrAan and bicy le circulation Ea- e) Outdoor coon areas, re f) Above ground utilities Lam"°' 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 w. feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements,' utilities and easements on the site [ 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [ 10) The location of mailboxes ( 3 11) The location of all structures and their orientation (64,' 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements grading Plan (nlo. of copies ) C 3 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following inforarat*ns 1) The location and extent to which grading .sill take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. ' 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: g a inter• su i a) Subsurface Qxploctior. -...I onotechnical engineering report C'3 '"b) The validity of sanitary sewer anA storm drainag ► service proposals c) That u1:i. problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated .,E ( ] Lt hit ctur l ®minas (lib o? copies jj:4 ' . The site development plan proposal shall o includes 1) . Floor plans indicating the square tagerof all structures proposed for use . itea and 4 r .:. 2) . Typical elevation drawings ;of• :•each •structure. ° = .. ti 4L�tA' LA�i ' � l"� ��Q7 olio. of copies ' i .. q 1 i W i4 w �E • The landscape plan shall be: dr r • at the I same • scale Of the `' . site analysis plan or a lager scale if necessary and .shall...— ... indicate: .• .. 1) Description of the irrigation system cohere applicable EI4' 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and. screenings ''• APPi.TC iirx ttf dIECKLIST — Page 2 3) 4) The 1) 2) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces C ] Location, type, size and species of existing and ,,, proposed plant materials. landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: Soil c0f+,itions. C ] Erosion control measures that will be used. C 3 F). Sign BieLliall Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 16.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the 4sign. C 3 G) Traffics tiore estimate H) Pry na rtition or lot line adjustment ma :;howini (No. of Copies ._.,): 1) The owner of the subject +arcel C 3 2) The owner's authorized gent C ] 3) The map ascale, date (20,50 , 00 or 200 feet.1) , inch north arrow C] 4) Description of par 1 location and boundaries C 3 5) Location, width a names of streets,,easements and other public was within and adjacent to the parcel C ] 6) Location of all .ermanent buildings on and within 25 feet of al property lines C 3 7) Location and w ddth of all water courses C 3 6) Location of air trees with'6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level C 3 9) All slopes g ater than 25% C ] 10) Location of xisting utilities and utility easements C 3 11) For major 1 partition which creates a public street: a) The p posed right-of-way location and width C 3 b) A scal cross-section of the proposed street plus y reserve strip ( 3 12) Any appli le deed restrictions C 3 13) Evidence t land partition will not preclude efficient suture land division where applicable C 3 C3 SuhdIvisi�s eli ina Copies 1) Scale equaling 30,50 and limited to o 2) The proposed name . 3) Vicinity map show arterial and co Namose'addresses developer, eng Oate of applica eoundaa:T:. lines as of adjace owners of adjo Plat 4) 5) 6) 7) e) and _ data showi : (No. of 00 oe 200 feet to the inch phase per sheet C f the subdivisioh 0 'C ] ng property ° s relationship to et tor ;streets . • r ° .. ( 3 and . itelephone . rss of the owner r;' sor. iey►ee y " designer. as applicable( E f tract be subdivided r;' - :. • ( 3 t:su bdivlsion.or•.s of recorded, nitig pai ns of, unsubdivided lid Contour lines related , to :A City-established bench-' mark at 2 -foot, intervals for. 0-10% grades greater than 10% APPtICATXO'M CHECKLIST -- Page 3 Cl a� 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): C J a) Public and privat right, -of --ways and easements ( J b) Public and privat sanitary and storm sewer lines ( 3 c) Domestic water m ins including fire hydrants [ 3 d) Major power tel ne transmission lines (50,000 'po its r greater) ( 3 e) Watercourse r, C 3 F) Deed reser vat' ons for parks, open space, pathways and other 1 encumbrances C 3 10) Approximate plan profiles of rot losed sanitary and storm sewers wig. grades and pipe sizes indicated C 3 11) Plan of the pro sed water distribution system, showing pipe si es and the location of valves and fire hydrants. C 3 12) Appr'+ximate cen er•line profiles showing the finished gr e of all i reets including street extensions for a e. enable dis ance beyond the limits of the proposed s�...�livision. C 3 13) Scaled cross s ctions of proposed street right-of-way; ( I 14) The location o all areas subject to inundations or storm water o erflow 15) Location, wid and direction of flow of all water- courses and d,. ainage ways 16) The proposed dimensions used for pu indicated u. 17) The location greater iseas the location 1S) The existing location of the structu are to remai 19) supplemental a) Proposed b) Prof of c) A propos improve 20) Existing natal croppings, 21) If any of the be shown on itco+rporated alication. �AI t configurations, apprex pate lot lot numbers. Where logs are to be ses other than residential, it shall be n such lots [ 3 f all trees with a diameter 6 inches or red at 4 feet above ground level, and of proposed tree plantings, if any C ses•of the property, including the 11 structures and the present Uses of s, and a statement of which structures after platting nfor oration including: eed restrictions (if any) property ownership • plan for provision or' subdivision nts. 1 features including rock out- . tlands and marsh areas. C foregoing ng information nnot acti ily e preliminary P a it be into a narrative and submitted with than C3 C] C] (3 APPLICATION ci1EC LIST z-- Page 4 5. 1. M (2) sOTIFICATIOS Litcr'iart ALL APPLICATSS I HO. nooprii--- IC CPO SO. 2. cm DEPAR/tuarrs 3. SPECIAL Building Official/Dave S. City Becorder Enginearingieterie D. Permits Facilitator/81°1a C. DXSTR1013 Fix* District (Pick-olo bar) Tigard Water District 0777 Si Durnbete St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED .71TRI5DIC2IOSS Wash. Co. Land VISO 6 Tramp. 150 IL, rIxst Ave. Hillsboro, CR 97124 Scant Curtis Kevin Martin Hike Borreaou Scott King Prad Iberia • .1 city of Beaverton aim Hendryx - Principal Planner PO Drat 4755 ton, OR 97076 city of King Cipt City inassOor _ 15300 SW 116= King City, OR 97224 2411; of Lake (*AV* 380 SW A Lake Oswego, 01 97034 State Highway Division PO Dor 25412 Portland, 01 97225-0412 tiPECUL ACENCErs C.e.11141 ...Telephone Tigard, CR 97201-341G 1181 Sutural Ca ° Scott Palmer 220 SW Secood Portland, 01 *7209 Tot Cablevialoo of Oregon Hallock • 3500 CW Baud St. Portland, CR 97201 Catadali Cable (WtSInk Stone) 14200 SW Zegetinom Ct. ••• Sesiertaa, CR 97003 ' 6. 811112 scum= Aeronautics Div. i000T a • laivialon of Ottito Lud • o rififttir NUL "sec' , Dept. et seetree. tr- Q" ,4.11:.4:. ...Nu •=• , ' .."',-.:t ..,,• : 7. Acarltanaranutara ' • . ,,......7.4.. 7... - 4,:t _____ Corps. ffif ce o Rawl/was Post O S. Cenum Rectitserai Pacific Tranapectatiod caspakt Miens Pf. Prorney, PLO 4.. Project anginser SOO 801 6th Avenion, L 3241; Haim Station Portland, OR Sr/209 • a • 41 Parks 6 FLOCWORtIOG Board PoLtce Field Operations School Diet So. 40 - (Beaverton) Joy Pedal PO BOX 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Diet. 231 - (Tigard) 131.37 SW Pacific 1w'. Tigard, OR 97223 Unified Seiffiralige Agency/SIM Program 155 ff. First St, Hillsboro, OR 97124 Boundary Conalasion 320 SW stark Room 530 Pectiend, OR 97204 INETRL-4GRRE117PcitTapnottr 600 PR Grand Portland, on 97232-2736 DLCD (CPAssiZOVe) 1175, Court St. 62 Sales, OR 97310-0590 4.4•44•••• Othar City of Durban ity Manager PO Sox 23463-3403 Tigard, 02 97224 City of Portland - Planning Director 1120 SW 5tb portunde on 97204 oboT Lidwien Rebmann 9002 SRMdLcughliti Bled. Hilwatikie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin PO nor 369 ' TUAlatin, 09 97062 Portland Cameral Rlec. Malin Boom 14655 OW 014) Debeine sty. Boavertca, CR 97007 Retro Arse 40U3 Jason Hewitt Win Oaks Technology Oontec 1015 62 162th Piece 0-6020 Beaverron, OR 97006-40186 DS West Pete Seise° 421 SW Oak St.. Waratad, 01 97204 Trz.stist Teseat pew. Kewmi 4012 SS 17th Ave. Portland, OR 97'202 - ktatitz •‘ • Gotta Le • .• • • 441 ' architect planner 510 N.W. Third Portland,Oregon 97209 Phone 248-1088 September 26, 1994 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 SUBJECT: Conlitional Use Permit Pre-application for St. James Episcopal Church, 11511 S.W. Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, Oregon Dear Sirs: This is a request for pre-application conference for the above referenced project. The project, as shown on the attached site plan, is addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel (approximately 60 square feet each) to the existing sanctuary, remo of the existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices (remodel area approxitately 1800 square feet) and addition of a tWo stor Sunday school/parish hall facility (approximately 440. quare feet each floor). Adequate parking and access drives are existing. The only parking modification is to re-stripe as required to meet current handicapped access parking standards. Sincerely, k.04-Je. W. Lane Brown A.I.A. Architect/Planner Architecture Zoning & Land Use • Facilities Planning t 4 1 CITY OF 'MAR MEDIII4M6b USE_MELOalli OREGON CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1151 I SW ibut...c. 1-41, 11.5.L.0 TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO, !AAP 2 5 j JL__t noc 1...,er tot, SITE SIZE PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* ADDRESS ij,lbLE)214EKiiii„.21_0. PHONE CITY 111:-215LGJOS_ ...--___ ZIP 8:L1./A- APPLICANT* OWNJEtZ. ADDRESS PHONE CO ...m044.0444.44m*444444444444144441.44444.■ CITY ZIP *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request conditional use approval to allow ACitot-ir afttO 0.14t&: 1.3 4:44 i..■11i1,4,4,4,4+,1144.444.44.4414 0/36P/23P Reit'd: 3/88 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. CUP 4-01 OTHER CASE NO'S: • ,e1; ■11101=11.01001101.11111MOONIMMINNIOMINI•111110M111.0111M, .01•111.01M RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ___L__ DATE: Application elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) 77(B) Owner's signature/written authorization 1E)656-q› (C) Title transfer instrument (1)1/' mworaromor (D)4ainWCWWWOJOI'ang74E) (B) Site plan (pre-app.checklist) (F) Applicant's statement (pre-app. checklist) (G) IgNite"se"VerFagfatigiiisfoOrgat **Meow 141151n- WON= (II) Filing fee (365) .■*'" DATE DETERMINED TO })E COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: 14.1414411.4.4.4441.4.44.4■41.441.44441.44.4444.444 COMP. PLAN/ZONE ES/GNATION: It7r7Orlamber: Hearings Officer Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering ; • 2 t LV • 4 3. List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this applic44tiOn:_htekig____ 4. Applipants: To have a complete applicatiOn you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above re uest does not violate an deed restrictions that ma attached to or im osed B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. above statements and the statements in the plot plan, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the so acknowledge that any permit issued, tbased on this may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are C. All of the attachments, applicants application, false. D. • 4 4 4 4 • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 140" day of ' 4 19c\4_ SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and.Wife) of the subject prOperty. .■1 ',I, 4 4 (KSL:pm/0736P) 4.444minmoommommassimem. t I tit. 414414AI NAME. r Jhmt74"1. ft„%P.IHOUPOL CUURGN 10.1)RL 1$ BOK 1,"';:ititea*i Ti6nfinl of,t.tiom 47;?Al p IJ PtuillikT RFCkIPT Nt ' 1411M11-4, i-,1010UNI IL,;14f3H LIMO iN 1 t (60 Pf4V,4PiNt ,0DLVIV, 0 1 J. / I 7/94 f31,44) V XS T ON 0 l'-'1,110A,A41; Ur 144Y Mit,14.1 klYKAJN't l,k .#1114P4MW 01- 4 1,..PINP LAIL: APPI. hhH 111(1,1 ANtIONT• P(41 i 471. 1■111,. qt.* 11,511 tiW DULL Nt kt) 010L MOUNI Oki THE DIOCESE OF OREGON, an Oregon corporation, conveys %Or to ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH, an Oregon corporation, the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. The consideraticin for 040 transfer is nO0e, DATED this .3.(1 day of -)s""-'1.%-/- l9'. JAPL0.,si STATE 'OF OREGON ) ) County of Multnomah The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi —17A -day of ......Jairmary ,, 19.110_ by Matthew P. Bigliardi, President, and Annette Ross, Secretary, of The Diocese of Oregon, an Oregon corporation, on behalf of thp corporation. ...../ ,, /1'4. .----' :‘ .. *'. . i • 4 m . , ' . ,/ .. Pu P for egon ty ommisqon eXp res 6-3-83 „. %,....,- .: 6.. Until a change is reqUested, all tax statements shall bu sent to the following addreSS: St. James Episcopal church P. 0. Box 23033 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Sf A tract of land located in Section 100 TownOlp 2 :;outeli, Runge I West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a stone monument marking the North quarter section cOrner of said Section 10; thence South 00°05' East 660.0 feet along the North and South center line of said Section 10 to an iron pipe, said iron pipe now being the initial point of the plat of Shadow Hills; thence continuing South 00°43154H West 576.00 feet along the Easterly line of thie plat of Shadow Hills and also the Easterly line of that tract of land which was con- veyed to The Diocese of Oregon and described in Deed Book 426 at page 598 to the Southeast corner of Lot 33 of Shadow Hills and being the True Point of Boginning of the herein described tract; thence West 252.24 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 34 og said Shadow Hills; thence South 00°43°49" West 441.70 feet to the Northerly line of Bull Mountain Road (County Road # A-147) being a 40.00 foot wide Road; thence along the Northerly line of said Bull Mountain Road North 85°12'32" East 25.06 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod at the Southwest corner of The Diocese of Oregon tract; thence North 78°134 East 232.06 feet to the Southeast corner of 'said tract of The Diopese of Oregon; thence . along the Easterly line of said tract of The Diocese of Oregon North 00°43'54" East 396.67 feet more or less to the True Point of Beginning. alielqghtlleverend OtlarthevolV13611 DD./Shp 'The Ilellarleverenii 'R gross J.D. S van,SfshV) The Bs/z9 :c Close 6 0 o Southwest- OK aptly £ e Tortiand Ova* Teleykotte ( 5 0 3 ) 6 3 6 5 6 sl Oviaititg Address :Tor "13tvc 1- 6 7, kake 0Swfgo, °von, 9 7 o 3 it. Diocese OF 0 ke9o1-4 k-711.z eimscorAt, cl-ittizch IN wesrerzN oize9oN December 17, 1975 Rectors & Wardens St. James Episcopal Church P.O. Box 23033 Tigard, OR 97223 Attenl. The Rev, Jackson Hazelett Dear Fr. Hazelett, The Board of Trustees in their meeting of December U, 1975 authorized the rreparation of a deed to convey the interests of the Diocese to your new Parish. It was their decision to postpone the delivery of the deed to allow you time to execute new notes involving the liability of the parish to individual lenders on the indebitedness formerly guaranteed by the Board of Trustees. I have prepared new notes for signature by your Vestry to replace those signed by Bishop Bigliardi and the Secretary 1r. Hallo Also, notes are enclosed for completion which will be substituted for other obligations. As soon as these instruments are returned, the Chancellor will draw the papers necessary to complete this transfer transaetion. GAB/8r Cordially* 1,411" Tenn A. Eaton inance Officer I. STATE OF OREGON CITY OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT* OP MAILING r) SR • r I, .o..152 .1 L�... , being duly sworn, depose and say that on,�.1 19c4 i caused to have mailed to each of the pervons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at I 5 , ., �. ` � f ; : ,Jep es..9: a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further ado that said notices ware enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the data Indicated above in the United States Post Office at ,1, with postage prepaid thereon. Subscribed and sworn to before me this OFFICIAL SEAL C ` ' J. MALINOVIStit ' , a NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON #- COMMISSION NO,024502 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUL'? g4, 1097 wmatmeematsiaremsesar h : \loginVo\effi all,alt Notary Pull My Comm Won Expires: MEETING OF CONCERNED NEIGHBORS OP ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH ..:Ir,:,,.,!, the was ..r.. ,,..t.,,,,,....:,.,,,..:....„,:.,...,...T....,...,.......::::;;;;,,:,„;:,.:,4:;;..-,..:..;,,, .,..,:■.'.:''`::i.'.':i--'''''''''' '...4.'le:'''::;::!;,..:,:-...'''..:'...,. .;.v.:';./.., '..- .......!: 4;,:.,':•...,',■.......1...:‘',;.i.....:.,..!..',.-. .-:-,'.-,.,,:,..•-;;• ... , ',",..:... ......../". "'*....,"...;.,,''.. '..:-...,,-.' ..',■'.,,,,-,22, .., '.., ,-,.:•,... ..„..., ..1..,, ' '-'7.....' ...„,. NOVEMBER 60 1994 4:00 P.M. Lane BroWn, architect, presented a prograu for interested neighbors. The following neighbors were present: Beverly Froude 12200 S. W. Bull Mtn. Tigard s Oregon 97224 Fred Crane 11455 S. W. Bull Mtn. Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97224 The following questions Were asked: Was everyone within 250 feet notified Of meeting? Yes, all were notified as required and notice posted to everyone who would be concerned. Mrs. Proud° commented that the addition to the church looks very nice, suitable and not noticeable from the road. Mt. Crane asked Whether We were increasing parking space at this time, and was there a possibility of doing so in the future? The answer was that we currently exceed the number of spaces permitted. He asked about the plans for starting. the answer was that construction could possibly start in the spring. Another question was why do we refer to it as a conditional use permit? The answer was that churches hate to go through this procedure because of possible negative tmpact on the neighbors. This is a safety device so that it does not impact the neighborhood adversely. NOV 17 '94 10:33 MULT MIN/JUDICIAL 503 240 3425 *,w PERSONS PRESENT AT MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1994 Lane Brown 510 N. W. 3rd Portland, Oregon Beverly a. Froude 12200 S. W. Bull mtn. Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Sue Burgess Faith Bledsoe June and Francis Wayne Kelley Tom Lowery Marian Mirsky Betsy Bachman Tamara Baker Fr. Doug Hadley Donna Bouman ' '; ,",*; •:•• • '0', 14 , • ",.: , ' • ;, ,”, • ,":", I • , • •- 7'1 • Warne of applicant ST Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Address or Genaal Location2,5- „ t ;,;„' . • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, 3- J C, 0 do alfirm that I am (represent) Ihe party initiating interest in a proposed C(24,/,atj-S2atjL.Vaa,_eatt,2rr„ affecting the land located at S- and did on the _2?fL. day of 19 F„,,„,q, personally post mike indicating that application, and the Vine, date and place of a the site may be proposed for a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal Signature V 4 • lisit` OFFICIAL SEAL J. PAM INOWSKI AOTANY PULA,10- OriEGON M COMMISSION NO:024602 MY COMMISSION XP111118 JULY 24, 1907 -nsmrooteuttgatoutansamiattiertmemerinistammotratu. WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO city of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 OCT 211994 St. James Episcopal Church _CANONRY DEVELOPMENT 11511 so w. bull mountain road 0 639-3002 p. o. box 23033 • tigard, '7regon 97223 October 20, 1994 SAMPLE LETTER RE: St. James Episcopal Church Dear interested Party: The St. James vestry, representing the owners, St. James Episcopal Church, are considering a building addition at the property located at 11511 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd, Tigard, OR. (Tax map #2S110BD 00100). The Church will be applying for a Conditional Use Permit to add an education wing to the present building at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the nssory permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners ',Ind residents. You are invited to attend a meeting co: Sunday, November 6, 1994 at 4:00 p.m, at St, James Episcopal Church 11511 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Please notice this will be an informational meeting on eptoktrjea, pions. These pions may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please ccil the Church office, 639-3002, If you have any questions regarding the meeting, Sincerely, Torn Lowery Chairman, 2X4 building Committee • ',—.:••••••:';'.' • Hill and Barbara Hampton 14465 S.W. 114th Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Roger and Phyllis Anderson 11777 S.W. Queen Elizabeth St. #333 King City, OR 97224 (Site: 11430 S.W. Bull Mountuln Rd, Tigard, OR Fredrick and Nelda Crane 11455 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Vernon and Magdalena Floren 14325 S.W. 114th AVE Tigard, OR 97224 Dana Delaney 14335 SW. 114th AVE Tigard, OR 97224 Zona Hugus 14355 S.W. 114th AVE Tigard, OR 97224 Lan N. Pham 14365 S.W. 114th AVE Tigard, OR 97224 Patrick and Pauline Beck 14425 SEW. 114th AVE Tigard, OR 97224 Randall and Stacey Norgart 11650 S,W. Bull Mountain Rd, Tigard, OR 97224 Vicki Artls 11670 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Nicholas and Lynette Garrett 12040 S.W. Bull Mountain Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Allen Sorrensen 11515 S.W. Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 Robert and Julie Loper 11530 S.W. Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 Stanley and Laurie Renecker 11550 S.W. Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 David and Lynne Dougherty 11580 S.W. Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 Bob and Susan Keller 11650 S.W. Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 Thomas and Betty Gannaway 14495 S.W. McFarland Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Harley and Carol Smith 14500 S.W. McFarland Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Darrell Burback 14520 S.W. McFarland Blvd, Tigard, OR 97224 Mark and Georgia Finsiey 14535 S.W. McFarland Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Christina Butcher 14550 S.W. McFarland Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 go OJJ Kenneth Dickey 7691 Rainbow Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 (site: 14565 S.W. McFarland Blvd, Tigard, OR) Gary and Hyun White 1 Bowerman Dr, Beaverton, OR 97005 (Site: 14570 S.W. McFarland Blvd., Tigard, OR) Herbert Moreno 14590 S.W. McFarland Blvd, Tigard, OR 97224 Thelma Perry 11710 S.W. Wildwood ST Tigard, OR 97224 CIT SUBCOMMITTEE: CIT Comm, Member Abdullah Alkadi 11905 S.W. 125th Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm, Member Bev Froude 12200 S.W. Bull Mountain Tigard, OR 97224 CIT Comm. Member Bill Gross 11035 S.W. 135th Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm. Member Christy Herr 11386 S.W. Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm. Member 5d Howden 11829 S.W, Morning Hill Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm. Member Kathie Kalilo 12940 S.W. Glacier Lily Tigard, OR 97223 f A CIT Comm. Member Linda Masters 15120 S.W. 141St Tigard, OR 97224 CIT Comm. Member Jim and Bonne Roach 14447 S.W. Tewkesbury Tigard, OR 97224 CIT Comm. Member Scott Russell 31291 Raymond Creek Rd. Scappoose, OR 97056 CIT Comm, Member Barbara Sather 11245 S,W. Morgen Ct Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm, Member Kathy Smith 11645 SAW, Cloud Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 CIT Comm, Member June Suiffridge 15949 S.W, 146th Ave, Tigard, OR 97224 CIT Comm. Member Larry Westerman 13665 S,W, Fern St, Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Comm, Member Cal Woolery 12356 S.W. 132nd Ct Tigard, OR 97223 CIT Cornm. Member Clark G. Zeiler 13290 S,W. Shore Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 1, CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLicATIoq CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet mat be brought and submitted with all other materials at the tine you submit Your aPPlication. SQQ your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. ITEMS TO BE ,INCLUDED: Staff Date 13:: BASIC MATERIALS A) Application for (1 ropy) 8) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument 0) E) plot or site ( F) (11) Filing fee ($...5g6.1_____) 5CD0 te5". SPECIFIC MATERIALS Applicant's statement 365 r+-260-fetatr A) . Site Information slitatAing (No, of copies kb ): C-4 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions Cl 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) (-I 4) Drainage patterns. courses, and ponds 5) Locutions of natural hazard aretc.: including: a.) Floodplaito areas (3 b) Slopes in excess of 25% ( 3 c) Unstable ground (3 d) Areas with high seasonal water table E e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential C 3 f. Areas having severely weak foundatio spils 4 1 6) Location of re3OUrCQ ,areas as shown on the Comprehemive Map inventory including: ,, a) Wildlife habitats b) Vletlands 7) Ct.er site featUres: a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with 6° tcallper" measured 4 feet . fro ti Otiound leVel'1., . 4 .. . • • 0) Locutioil of altigtismit4tructureq aaf2 Omit use* 9) kocation am4 type of' 00 awl off-site hofmn sources .112 tlt:ctlllli:"FISIIi.IIeI711:al' ;';:':' 8) Site 04: stelemplithisitr.: (u of and" • i ... 1) The pmpo3ed:site allvdt.suryouridihs propertl sp., '..4i.,*•4•' e :'- '2) Contour 'llne i•Otia'ristaliog.t4,.. 4.'..,. 44., 4 ; .: 3) The location, dia‘siolisand names of all;. ,% a) gaii5tikos,16 Matt streets & other public way s . , and easements on ,the site and or, wijoirling ' properties . 4 ..1.t t.7; ... :4 , . • • .0.. f* 4.0 41. r-r Et-Fro t riit! APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page 1 t MiildnaMeklai b) ' Proposed streets or other pubs A ways & easements on they site. CO" c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension E 3 4) The location and dimension of a) Entrances and exits on the site (L.? b) Panting and clree4.AtaatSon areas 6' c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation C e) Outdoor common areas,, EA f) Above ground utilities C They location, dimensions s & :setbacic distances e'i!f ail a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements ohich aro located on the s 1 tee and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site rpe 4 b) Proposed structures, Improvements, utilities and easements on the site , EL 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions E 7) Sanitary sewer facilities (Le 9) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques Cam'` 10) The location of mailboxes C 3 11) The location of all structures and their grientat .on C ,," 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements i C) d rxr . Ian (No. of copies The site development plan shall, include a grading plan at the same se: ale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and .soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registere0 engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface ecp1oratzeen and getotectoicat engineering report • ` b) The teal .dity +of s itary sear and sstor drainage ser vice ms s y ec) That all emblems will ha mitigated and h theyi,ll tigated •` ,, Arerl�iae ctur h Or inns ' ti iBhe site ede�eela...... mt lire er 1oor bar � di atf e a c ,. • s�uc�ures proposeedl `for. ��� , , � 2) .. Typical elevation d.... ... s :o e- ich `; fete• , �e !,!*1 ` .1. ^a ■ a �E Lal`dsc9t,. •. ® S o i esi1 ♦ `. - ➢ C3 C CI The landscape plan ' shall `► ed .at +ghee: si ' S cal a alf =,,�, � '.:e y Pan r a r e T * site analysis 1 ec.., ,aai � scale if ce , indicate: „ 1) iescriptiop of the irrigation ,.. sY stesto 144600 .,., . ., a liebY " . 2) Location amd height o f f Cesa OUffars gc90e01. 4 APPLICATION CHE lt►L ST =- Page 2 3) Location of terrac6.gs, 4(h:14, shelters, play areas and common open spaces ( 3 4) Location, type, size and species of existing an4 proposed plant materials. rkr The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses! 1) Soil conditions. (3 2) Erosion control measures that mall be used. E 3 F). Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development RegieW or prior to obtaining a Building eermit to construct the sign. E 3 G) IrdtismenatieraJt±ieats 11) PrOAminacyjartitionojotikmacrtustamntemlhallini (No. of copies , 1) The owner of the subject,06rcel ( 3 2) The owner's authorized)abent ( 3 3) The map scale, (20,50 00 or 200 feet=t), inch north arrow and date ( 3 4) Description of pat- 1 locition and boundaries ( 3 5) Location, width a . names of streets,.easements and other public wa within and adjacent to the parcel E 3 6) Location of all -rmanent buildings on and within 25 feet of al propertY lines (3 7) Location and w dth of all water courses ( 3 0 Location of a trees 04046" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ( 3 9) All slopes g ater than 25% (3 10) Location of xisting utilities and utility easements ( 3 11) For major 1, . partition mhich creates a public street: a) The p posed right-of-way location and width ( 3 12) et scal d cross-section of the proposed street plus y reserve strip ( 3 12) Any eppli ..le deed restrictions ( 3 13) Evidence ,,t land partition twill no preclude efficient mture land division where applicable (3 I) Subdivisio' relimina Plat iL,,...,. und data shAgg(o. of Copies -......--); 1) Scale equaling 30,50 00 Or 200 feet to th4; WA • und limited to o phase per sheet (1 2) The propOSed flasitt f the sUbdiVisioh ,... af 3 ( 3) Vicinity map show ns preportra relttionship to arterial and co et:toe 4000t$ ,. : E 3 4) Naas, . addire$stati erid,Ite1900410.P1,04300 of thg 40044,t ..... ciettelopet., tosi aiii-e. sitryeyervdoisotatro ,;11* Oppneall40E 3 5) Bate of 40plitte ionif:~:tRt'Ai -1Vi.... ';‘,°. : . E 3 7) Wawa Of adjace tosabdiyisi4ori.Oagetw of (1"ocor4ed:, 6) aoundairl Mies f ittpact.fto be'rsubdivide4 ;:•t.... ..:',.... C 3 wner* of attjo 010:9 pacalli ot ottlitthdtiftdttd lima. : E 3 4.. O) ektobtior line* palatal t.40,* ca ,..ottAbItitlits Wit1014- iii-41! ..:.: Oat* at 2400t,itr4tenea1 i$ fur.040% grado gtoatot ., `i, :=1,. thwl tOlt, .t.I. ,, , t 3 4' Apputatriott diEct<LIsT pa g0 3 . , 9) i rpose, location, type and siz,2-:‘' all of the following (within and adjacent to t4 proposed subdivision): / . 1] a) public and private right-of-way* and easemen 3 0) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ( 3 c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants E 3 d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts pr greater) 1 3 e) Watercourses / E 3 f) Deed resecva4ons for parks. open space, pathways and other 1 nd encumbrances f. 3 10) APproximatq) plan pd profile* of proposed sanitary and storm sewers wit/ grades and pipe sizes indicated ( 1 11) Plin of the proplaed water distribution system, showing pipe si es and the location of values and fire hydrants. 1 3 12) Approximate cen erline profiles showing the finished grade of all s: reets including street extensions for a reasonable dis ance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. C 3 13) Scaled cross s ctions of proposed street right-of-waY: C 3 14) The location o all areas subject to inundation or storm water o erflow . 1 3 1.5) Location, wid and direction of flow of all water- courses and d ainage ways 3 16) The proposed et configuratiOns„ approx.ipate lot dimensions lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pur ses other than residential. it shall Ola indicated u.in such lots 1 3 17) The location gf all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater Teas red at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any 1 3 18) The existing ses.of the property, including the location of 11 structures and the present uses of the structu 5, and a statement of which structures are to remat after platting (3 Supplemental 'nformation including: a) Proposed eel restrictions (if any) (3 • b) Proof' of proper ownership ( 3 c) A propost plan for provision of sub4ivizi°0 improve -0U 4 3 20) Existing natu -1 features including rook out-. croppings, elands and marsh areas... 21) If any of the foregoing informatio cannot practicably be shown on he preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a faitrative; owl submitted with the application. , .. .. • 0 . 4 ". 4tAio: .. . 3) Other Information Sol me ,Ase.16 wirmim dm:miser — Page 4 r 1. mho no. 2. CITY REPARTKEXTS Oulltlidg Official/Dave S. City Meadrder Engineering/Chris P. Perniti facilitator/Vials G. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICtO Piro Dietrict (Pick-up has) Off xa'r ALL APPL CAI Tigard Waver District 4777 St MUZIthiltri St. Tigaurd, OR 07223 Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 SW Tat.ylora Ferry 94. Tigard, OR 97223 4. aritc=ca avatsoxortots Wish. Co. Lead Ude Tramp. 150 O. rivet &ea. Oillebaro* OR 97124 Breit Curtis Zawin itartin -7-- Mika Dorroson — Scott Ring ---- Prod Shoals City of Reawertaa .7las Gendryx - Principal tilannar PO Dor 055 Deavertoa, CO 97076 City of Xing city City Reneger 15300 SW 116th Xing City, OR 97324 City of *aka Oswego City Manager 390 SW A Lake Oswego, OR trto34 atuto ilighway Division — Deb DOCI41 PO Box 25412 Portland, Exa 97225-0422 5. armcv.t, ter:A=5 combat-ma MaletVersie togineering Officer PO lkiat 2,416 5tigard, CO 97291-3416 SU ranixtrail Gen Soott putout 220 RV Saone* &Ono Ponstland, OR 97209 • Tt Caidaerision tot Oregon Mike Railltioat 3r,003%, Wood 11/44-asiksie 88201 • Colombia table ,gavoink ittootria — 24200 9W BriritedtwelCte Seinvertne, 011 97005 64 STS =MUSS 14441•1404■00144 Parka & Poostwition Resod 777 Palle. 7-- Tioald Opot‘axtiiii School Dist So. 40 (10414VOrtatl$ Joy Pahl PO Son 200 Beaverton, 0R 97075 School Dist. 233 — (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific U. Tigard, oa 97223 Unified Sgt) Agency/SW program — 155 X. 'trot St. Millsboro, OR 971.24 BOundary COonalasion 320 SU Stark ROOM 530 port1an4, OR 97204 tottIRO cREEnsPBCDS PROMS - Had Odle (CP./X13) 600 RR Dread Portland, OR 07232-2736 ✓ irtu (cgiViatudt44) 1175. Court St. RS Sales, OR 97310-0590 other • city at Dothan — Stenagar Cl PO Sox 23403-34133 Tigard, oa 97224 City of Portland ---- Planning Director 1120 XV 5th Port,land, OR 97204 COOT Littwien Raba= 9002 EX liralvaighlin Died. taIR 97222 att ot Tualatin - PO 11�c369 • oftalatiza, CO 97062 Wartlaod Coverall Else. Drina Roars • 14655 SW Old Scholia try. beavezton, OR 97007 Metro knee elossonnicaticeas Jason Mewitt TWIG Oaks Terionalogy Onoter 1815 101 16919 Place -6020 Reamortos, OR 970064606 • US West Pets alm= 421 XV Oak et. a Portland. OS 97204 r- 4 a: a4 • an Roar 4012 SR 27tia Res. Portland, 041 97202 • ‘" wciAnut wit satonentine Die. (ooctr) . ".!,'.‘ • •,.., 4 ..,— ..io.-.....2' •• ' 1:000,Aid Diviailas of Stet. WAnde -1:,.. . ..M.,.•:',ist,'.... .. •eriit i"--- ' = .. , , , -'..,t , .i . Dept. of tairliton. ogett1tv 4i ' Airj.,,;•:, ''',:tit,_:?'""""*" . ,.?„ -,--. ' '. ,t. a ‘• X.,,.. ' 7. PRDURAL atritSCLRS • • • ".ii, t.-. .41.g. .......71 .....i..........—......-....— 1.. • ..., Post Office • li: ; • 4 • .., Carpi. �C Segibeire '• , a. coomma Soothers Incitic trumportatimaCMvagr Dawn ratmety, itiza ruidect aollassiety SOO SW 6th 2:11,11000S,1 Eto 2240 Val= itelddelt tarttatido 011 117209, • * • • •0444o * LEGIBILITY' STRIP XIS, so- f 'OM WNW as peter' It 9>i.a:.s. 'Sr ° -Sirr sr '92 rrairrfr• "'LT 9a -.it `99 DE M r .a •9T Flan artaref et 'WS l4i: aDS7J9r. .9= 'Sr .3111 a:Crailr' .0 it MIMS !Mr s _ r .5 .5 !M t13115S Oriel art •a:' 1119.21118, .c:•t •r a4ala4`.F. •9 aria •T 1St .4111 air .rt Ea '.u; •T .110327 roan es _ i Si 3 . g'iYi�C •2=113 1=a t0! Fr dO 'NM= 51 VAS SUS AZILIMairrr i OM OR Mir !@rrsS7_ Rt. 55 IMIMISIRS _, axiom ORM= •tiT/sam TEr Mari 9�MR phi IT .111831MNOW It MI= 15 T$ 5=514L MINIM �D ••455 ,K: Y. ,Q •5= 6a 9=1:9511 '5= a. WW1 CU a Mill r MI5 t as em t rasraa 'aat =5 n: i Mr Or =5= ZOMARS8 ads ISM rr '= tan OW t 8 a8 rat WS 84r 555 1tIl= =NM arad JrAIV �r�►�-arrr•.rl t.... -:� i__ �i�.ara�.�c:ff a�x�;r!L • t 100.10.2,-MESOMOME • DATE: DebembtLI,J231.______ Tigard Planning Department CONDITIONAL USE CUP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Moatain Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approVal to allow the addition of an aColytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of at existing parish hall for rude as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish halI/sUnday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) Tte R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support faeJilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, fairkily day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you Wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Dec. 120 1994. You may use the space provided below dr attach a separate letter to return your comments. f_,y2A_eivzLiknak_2L,e_,tst_ugjaondb_p_y2Ae.t,ps". please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in Writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Vlanning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our officio. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comment6: Name of Person Commenting: NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATION 1, CIT (2) Copies 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS Offidisl/DaVe 3. C ty Recorder gineering/Michael A. Permits Facilitater/Jerree G. 1111•112•111.01 Parks & Recreation Board ,'Police Field operations!' Long Range Planning/Carol 3. SPECIAL DISIMICTS Piro District .2ick-up box) Tigard Water Deptetment 8777 SW Burnham St, Tigard, OR 97223 TUalatin Valley Water District --"*" PO Box 745 Beaverton, OR 97075 4, AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use es Transp. 150 ne First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis (CPA's) im Tice (IGA'S) Nike Borreson (Engineer) Scott King (CPA's) _Tom Harry (Current Pinning App's) Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) City of Beaverton airit HendryX Principnl Planner PO Boc 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 city of King city city Manager 15300 SW 116th King city 0 OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego city Manager 380 SW A Lake Oswego, OR 97034 State Highway Division Sam Hdnaidi PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225-0412 Unified Sewerage AgeneY/SWM Prograa 155 N. First St. Hilleboto0 OR 97124 Boundary Commission . 800 NE Oregon St. 116 Suite 540 Portland, OR 97232-2109 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232-2736 DIM (CPA'ai20A'a) -* 1175 Court St, NS Wet, OR 97310-0590 city of Durham City Manager PO Box 23483-'3483 Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland - Planning Director 1120 sW 5th Portland, OR 97204 ODOT LaUrie Nieholson 9002 SE McLoUghlin Blvd, MilWaukie, OR 97222 • city of Tualatin 00 Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 5, SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone - Engineering Office PO Box 23416 Tigard0 OR 97281-3416 NW Natural Gas - Scott Palmer 220 NW Second Ave, Portland, OR 97209 TCI CableVidion of Oregon - Linda Peterson 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (irank stone) 14200 sW Brigadoon ct, BeaVerten, OR 97005 6. STATE AGENCIES . AdrefieUtied DiV. (ODOT) Division of State Lando ComMerte Dept. - M4U Park Fish a Wildlife ptid Dept. of EfiViron, QUalitY 14 FEDERAL AGENCIEJ derps. of Engineers Peat Office 8. OTHER .60Uthern Padifid TrandOrtation Company "----DUane M. Ferhey0 PS -,projedt Engineer 800 NW Oth AVonVel R. 3240 Onion Station Portland, OR 91209 014 Portland General Med, • Brian Moore 14655 sW old Seholle Fry. BeaVortOn0 OR 97007 Metro Area CommUniCatiOns ----"aadOn Hewitt Twin °Aka Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Beaverton 0 OR 97006,4886 OS Welk kite Nelson 421 SW Celt Pettlandi Olt 97204 Tri,Mot Transit DeV. Kim Knox 710 NE Ho1laday.8t., Pottland0 OR 97232 DWAN't (3111Sit • • , INEMENEBNIMENNENEENSISEENEENNWEMIVEN architect 9 planner 510 NW Third Portiond,Oregon 97209 Phone 248-1088 November 15, 1994 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit amlication for St. James ERA:222ml Church 11511 S.W. Bull Mt. Rdamiti. ilmsganz. Dear Sirs: This is a request for Conditional Use Permit approval for the above referenced project. A Pre-Applica 4' Conference was held on October 4, 1994 regarding thik,,, ix;,oject. All items of submittal requested at that time are included in this application package. In addition, the Land Use Notification Process has been completed, Copies of the Affidavit of Posting Notice, Affidavit of Mailing, letter of notification and mailing list have previously been submitted to your office. Copies of the sign-up sheet and notes of the fieighborhood meeting comments are included with this Submittal. PROJECT _DESCRIPTION The project, as shown on the attached drawings, is addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctUary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and addition of a two story Parish Hall/Sunday School wing to an existing church building. As part of this project, a classroom building and portions of the existing parish hall and offices Will be removed. The total area of building to be added is 10090 sqUare feet, to be removed is 1,895 square feet, for a net total facility area increase of 8,295 square feet, 11.11MINNIMIIMIIM.1.11:10.01M10•110.04.,1110, Architecture o Zonlbg & Land Use • Facilities Plc:inning PARKING Adequate paved parking and access drives are existing. A total of 47 spaces are required and 67 are provided. Perimeter landscape and fence screening, lighting and interior tree planting are existing. The only parking modification is to construct a sidewalk along a portion of the east edge of the existing parking lot and to re-stripe as shown to meet current handicapped access parking standards. LANDSCAPING Two new street trees are proposed, to replace those that Would be destroyed by construction of the sidewalk along Bull Mountain Road. All other site landscaping is existing and all areas of landscaping are currently irrigated. SIGNS No new signs are proposed, however, existing signs are to be relocated as a result of sidewalk conotruction. The signs Will not be within the 30 foot clear vision area adjacent to the parking lot access drives. RIGHT OF-WAY DEDICATION The existing right-of-way width is 20 feet frt.1 the centerline of the right-of-way to the church property. City of Tigard Engineering Division staff is recommending an increaoed dedication to 35 feet from the centerline of the right-o This is shown on the site plan. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Engineering Division staff is recommending half street improvements along Bull mountain Road to include paving to 22 feet from the centerline of the road with a curb and 6 foe4t Wide sidewalk. This is shown on the site plan, hoWever, we Would request that this requirement be postponed until such time as development of sidewalks at adjacent properties takes place' The reason kor our reqUest Is that the sideWalk, If deVeloped now, would not be accessible from either end and, since parking is not allowed along Mill Mountain Road and no bus service ia available, would not be usable via vehicle parking or transit access either, Because of the existing adjacent site grade at the neighboring property to the east, a retaining wall approximately 3 feet high would be :^equired at that end of the walk. East of that wall location exists a dense planting of cedar trees that would prevent any potential pedestrian access prior to major modifications on the neighbor's single family residential property. Immediately in line Wth the west end of the sidewalk is an existing ditch and storm drain inlet, with no existing pedestrian access other than the bicycle lane, which also exists along the church property. The property development to the west of the church property is a single family residence, with access from S.W. Mc Farland Blvd. and no access to Bull Mountain Rd. Power poles are currently located in the edge of the existing bike lane paving, These would have to be relocated and would require replacement of the power connections to properties across Bull Mountain Road. If these wires are to be located underground in the future, it would mean demolition of portions of this recommended street and sidewalk improvement to accomplish. It seems that all of this work would be better undertaken at the time when adjacent properties develop pedestrian access or when a local improvement district addresses improvement of a larger section of Bull Mountain Road. The church would, therefore, request to be allowed to sign a waiver of remonstrance to future improvement rather than to be required to provide an unusable improvement at this tiMe. SANITARY SEWERS The church isicurrently connected to the public sewer system. WATER SUPPLY The church is currently connected to the public water system. VIRE PROTECTION Fire protection requirements have been reviewed with Gene Birchill of the Tualatin Valley Fire District, Vire flows are adequate and two additional fire hydrants, as shown on the site plan, will be added as part of this project. STDRMWATER The first phase of the existing building (sanctuary, built in 1963) was connected to the public storm drain system at BUll Mountain Road. The second phase (pariqh h411, built in 1974) utilized on-site disposal via daylighted drain piping. There are no surface ponds or Waterways created by this diaposal method and runoff to neighboring properties is not apparent. A system of an-site disposal will be utilized for thin addition, if deemed appropriate by the Unifi eWerage Agency, If thi method is not approved, the additional storm drainage may be connected to an existing storm main at the northeast corner of the site. CONCLUSION It is our feeling that all elements of this proposal are consistent with the applicable zoning requirements. We therefore request approval of this Conditional Use Permit with the condition that the half street improvement requirement be postpone d until such time as development Of sidewalks at adjacent properties takes place, 14) W. Lane Brown A.X.A. Architect /Planner MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: William D'Andrea December 20, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP 94-0009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH DIMajalati2a: The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an addition to the existing sanctuary at the church located at 011511 SW Bull Mountain Road. The site is also known as Tait Lot 2S1 10BD 100 which has an area of 2.40 ac. Findinqs: 1, STREETS: The existing parking lot for the church currently has two one-way driveways that connect to SW Bull Mountain Road, a Major Collector street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan. SW Bull Mountain Road is also a Washington County road. No change is proposed to the onsite driveway system. The existing right-of-way for SW Bull Mountain Road, as measured from the centerline of street, is 20 feet wide. The right-of-way required to match the existing dedications to the west is 35 feet, The applicant should be required to dedicate the additional right- of-way. The existing roadway consists of a 32 foot wide asphalt concrete pavement that provides one 11 foot wide vehicular and one 5 foot wide pedestrian lane in each direction. The standard condition of approval for this type of development is to require one-half street improvements along the entire frontage. The applicant has requested that the improvements be deferred to the future when a Local Improvement District is formed to improve a larger portion of SW Bull Mountain Road that would include the project frontage. The Engineering Department has reviewed the topographic constraints at the site and would suggest that an alternative sidewalk location may be justified to save the cedar trees noted in the application, that are located at the easterly end of the Site. The widening of the existing street can be accomplished without any unusual circumstances, except that a portion of the proposed sidewalk should be located in an easement on private property, to align with a grade compatible with the adjoining properties and the existing trees, As noted, there are power pol3s and overhead lines on both sides of the street, and the applicant should be requited to place these facilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergroUridingi ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 94-09 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH PAGE 1 -71,1-1.5 -r V? 2. SEWER: t) The isting building is connected to the existing 8" public sanitary sewer. in SW Bull Mountain Road and no changes are proposed. The sewer has sufficient capacity for the proposed addition. 3. STORM DRAIN: The site slopes in a northeasterly direction to the 6" storm drain located in an easement on the adjoining "Shadow Hills" subdivision. The storm drain should be extended onto the site to a point located a minimum of 5 feet southerly of the northerly property line and a catch basin constructed to City standards. In addition, a storm drain easement should be dedicated to the City for access and maintenance of the storm drain. The drainage from the additional impervious area created by the new construction should to be directed to a new on-site swale, from the end of the existing on-site "daylight' storm drain, to the new catch basin, The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7.10b of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which the fee in-lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on-site facility would preclude the effective development.", the fee may apply. It is our opinion that this site is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend that a fee in- lieu be required. LEGIBILITY STRIP Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. Right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Bull Mountain Road frontage to inerease the right-of-way to 35 feet from centerline, The description shall be tied to the proposed right-of- way centerline as approved by the Engineering Department. The dedication document shall be on City fotms. Instructions are available from the Public Counter and the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department (639-4171), 2. Standard one-half street imptovements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, storm drainage, streetlights, and undergzound utilities shall be installed along the SW Bull Mountain frontage, Improvements shall conform to the alignment of exiSting adjacent improvements, as approved by the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (6394171). 3, Three (3) sets of detailed _public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department: Seven (7) set 6 Of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 54-09 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH PAGE 2 - ; Profes onal Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings requited by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John HagMan, Engineering Department (639-4171). . The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and Transportation of Washington County, to perform work within the tight-of-way of SW Bull Mountain Read, A copy shall be provided to the City Engilleering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit, sTArr CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171). 5. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormmater drainage system or by an on-site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171). 6. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Bngineering Department (639..4171). 7. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Reselution No. 94-18. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 0. The applicant shall place the existing overhead facilities underground or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 9. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. gsnulL This .is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public l'ight-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE F THE Inkkaglijganalg. THE COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT CODE. THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18,1206060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amoUnt not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan) and 2. Approve and release such bonds. 13. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 94-09 S. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHORCH PAGE "- • SCTIO tl. S.I4 STREET A IL ND UT TY IMPROVEMENT STANDAIID el Sectl'on 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall tot be resumed until the City is not4fied. APPROVED: City Engineer ngineer\CUP0440.mJa t: • ENG/NEEAING COMMENTS COP 04-09 S. amts EPISCOPAL CHURCH PAGE 4 TO• „dieedego( tp8":44 FOR COMM , 41 ,.' ..dr•Ar. 'er DATE: December 2 19 4 DEC 0 5 1994 LANO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ND USE a InANSPORTATION FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WtTM 281 108D, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for Use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sUnday school Wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter. 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, pUblic support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the neat future. If you Wish to comment on this application, We need your comments by nec. 12, 1994. YoU may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments, ou are t.....Lx_daLita.2.19.,z9.21.4.12,.,, above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and nfirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact: the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, PHONE: 639-4171. RECEPIED DEC 1 3 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT atirtatiesamiss STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ii1/41101■111111.1111104 imposuemonoommo We have reviewed the proposal and have no objection to it. Please contact PleaSe refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. airivmownimeroonramemongswn •arowaosimair■ Name of Person Commenting: Phone NUmber: 49Y- loworreft, • , , WASIIINGTOtCOUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation, Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648 -8761 • FAX: (503) 603 =4412 Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall. Tigard, OR 97223 RECEIVED NC 1 3 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPIVIENt December 12, 1994 RE: ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL. CHURCH W CUP 94 -0009 Washington Count; has reviewed this development application and submits the following comments and required conditions for access to SW Bull Mountain Road, a County Major Collector: CSENTS Resolution and Order 86.95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to erform a preliminary sight distance review for this project, because of the current Work load. Therefore, the applicant nen i be provide de certification from a registered professional engineer adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road, BECOM.COMANS.ReiMit . 1. PRIOR TQ APP toVA .. R0 1 S p R Lb _ P `t" _ 3 Q TF • Submit Carolyn velopm Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy , 761): 1. Completed "Design Option" form, 2: $750.00 Administration Deposit, 3 Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in dis accordance prepared and stamped a mped by a registered engineer at the access point to SW eul l ecssarRt. Provide of what improvements are necessary to provide ae g ae detailed sight distance. NOTE: not used by Any portion of the Administration Deposit no . , Washington County for tan approval, field inspections contract administration plan Pp i will be returned to the pp I f at any time during - � the project, ec an con applicant, , 9 p � t. the Washington ©Co�ant � will ghbill than the the applicant _ deposited, amount epos needed to cover its costs, pp i cant the amount County Transportation Review December 12, 1994 Page W2 Two (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. b. Commercial access to SW Vull Mountain Road to County standards in location as the existing access points. c. Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. d. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. B. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon co letion of the fol lowing: 1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I.A.4. The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook, 648- 8761) of Land Development Services will send the rlquired forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans. 2, Provide evidence that the documents required by condition /.0 have been recorded. C. The following documents shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: 1 Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 33 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2, Provide a one•foot non-access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points, NOTE: Washington County Survey Division (Jamil Kamawal, 693- , 4543) will send the requited forms to the applicants representative. V' • II . PRIOR TO MPANCY A. The road improvements required in by conditions IA4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. B. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer upon completion of necessary improvements, • A' County Transportation Review December 12, 1994 Page #3 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County upon completion of your review. We would also appreciate the opportunity to review a draft of the City's conditions pertaining to access to SW Bull Mountain Road. 1f you have any questions, please contact me at 648-8761. rV Associate •Planner Lynn Bailey, Transportation Planner Doug Norval, Traffic Analyst Carolyn Cook, Associate Planner, Assurances Paul Ward, Engineering Associate (Appl i cant) '41 th/J:transpistitmlas.titi WASHINGTO COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and TranspOrtation, Land Development Services RECEIVED 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-8761 • FAX: (503) 693-4412 DEC 1 3 '1914 tommutitlY 9EVEL0PMEN1 December 12, 1994 Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Si. JAMES EPISCOPAU CHURCH - CUP 94-0009 Washington County has rwiewed this development apPlication and submits the following comments and requ:red condition.; for access to SW Bull Mountain Road, a County Major Collector: MOB Resolution and Order 86-95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to perform a preliminary sight distance review for this project, because of the current work load, Therefore, the apOicant will be required to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road. REMED_CagnailS"A_A,...HEA PRIOR III FINAL APPROVAL AND ISS E OF' A MIDI p y THE my OF TIGARD: A. Submit to Land DevelopMeot_Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy Stone/ Carolyn Coot, 648-8761)1' I. Completed "Design Option" form. 2, $750.00 Administration Deposit. 3: Provide preliminary certification of adequate tight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered Professional engineer at the access point to SW Bull Mountain Road, Peovide a detailed list of what Improvements are necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance. NOTE: Any portioo_ofthe Administration_Oeposit riot used by Washington County for plan approval, field inspectiiint, and contract _adminittpation will be returned to the applicant, If at any, time during the project, the county's costs are highei, than the ,amount depositedi Washington county will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs. LEGIBILrry STRIP r.. 1 County Transportation Review December 12, 1994 Page 42 4. Two (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, b. Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County standards in location as the existing access points. c, Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. d. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. B, Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the following: 1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I.A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook, 548- 8761) of Land Development Service will send the required forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans, 2. Provide evidence that the documents required by condition I.0 have been recorded. C. The following documents shall be exe(uLed and recorded with Washington County: 1. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 33 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2, Provide a one font non access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points, NOTE Washington County Survey Division (Jail Kamautle 693 4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative. II. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY A, The road improvements required in by conditions IAA, above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. B. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional A engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements, 4 "4, County Transportation Review December 12, 1994 Page #3 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County " also a rec� a upon completion o, n of ertai n your review. We would g to pp to the opportunity to review eW a draft of the Ci ,� y 1 ease � s conditions ons pertaining ontaet me ao access to SW Bull Mountain Road. If you have any questions, please Tom r Associ ate Planner Lynn Bailey, Transportation Planner Doug Norval, Traffic Analyst Carolyn Cook, Associate Planner Assurances Paul Ward, Engineering Associate (Appl i ant) et th /j :transp /stiafectigi 4 ]DATE: December 2 1994 PROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDXTIONAL USE CUP 94. X1009 ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW mull. Mountain Road (WCTM 2S 108D, tax lot 100) . A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation ednaccessible officesremodel andfnew facility room and email chapel to an existing parish hall for use as handicapped parish bell /sunda�r school wing entry and an addition of a two story p . APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.18O0 18.102, 10.106, 18.108, x9.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZOII R -2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, , manufactured homed, family ily day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agenc ee and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared an proposal in the near future. If you wish and a decision will. be pandered on the p' to comment on this application, we need your comments by Decc 12,, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attache eeparate letter to return your comments If ou are unable to ree•ond the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your commente and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regardingrthis sm stter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., 4 . PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D' Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposlil and have no objections to it Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Person Commenting: Phone Welber: , • ',. ,r: ■'.'' TO: Tigard Planning Department PROM: Maintenance Services Department DATE: December 12, 1994 SUBJECT: Conditional Use CUP 94-0009 - St James Episcopal Church The Maintenance Services Department has nc clomments on the above referenced Conditional Use request. , 4 • FROM: Tigard Planning'Department CONDIT/011AL USE CUP 94-0009 T.L.I.MIMLIT=TESBung LOCAT/ON: 11511 SW BUll Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 1081), tax lot in). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an eXisting parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two storY parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18,46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 toning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near fUture. If you wish to corm-wit on this application, we need your comments by Dec. 12, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. JUL:422.are unable to res onc, b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171, STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objectims to it, MM Please contact . of our office. IMEIONIOIMal Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 4'1 Phone NUmber: BEVE2_,ELELP9 MMENTS TO: FROM: Tigard Planning Department.. RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 94-0009 ST. aAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountln Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114. 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-3 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farmihg, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant 6 statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Dec. 12, 1904. You may Use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If oU are Unable to tamenAjay_thl_above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If yoU have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,, Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT Will DoAndrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office, Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments: DATE: December 2 1994 . , . , , ' *.; • To:7644A FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 94-0009 ST, JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 251 10BD, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CR/TERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE 1 R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day cares, homI occupations, temporary Uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. Front information supplied by varioi.a departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal iA the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Dec. 12, 1994. You lohNY use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If �u are unable to,LelacMcilLti:39ab,....sata_ciftlIG please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments: of oUr office. Name of rSon Commenting: MOST ST POA COMMENTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO a- . af ' ' DATE: December 2 _ .1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: C XTOA1 USE CUP 94M0009 ST. JAME EPISCOPAL CHU H LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 1OBD, tax lot 100) A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing Parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall /sunday school wing. CRITERIA: APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Develor,ent Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units /acre) The R -2 zoning allows single family ridential, public support u port facilities, residential treatment homes, es g rues, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. Prom information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Dew, 1994. You may use the space e un Flo _ to res and the shave date please � return your comments. �,f ou a ... provided below or attach a separate letter t phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as Poess .ble If any questions - r, contact the Tigard lanning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., ard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments j -c co Name of Pearson Commenting: Phone Number: 1C221,10thaital 1.19151fil....1191L99Mtlaala DATE: December 2 1094 RECEIVED DEC 0 8 1994 commutiny DEVELOPMENT FROM; Tigard Planning Department RE: maxixoNAiaLsEc....mjAzgpsti sT JAMES EP/SCOPAL CHURCH LOCAT/ON: 11511 SW Bull Mountain Road (IPA.ITM 2S1 10BD, tax. lot 100) . A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for the as handicapped aceessible offices and new facility entry and an additiOn of a two story pariah hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRIT8RXA: CommUnity DevelopMent Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, la 08 18.1140 18.130 and 18.164. ZO1VE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allOWs single family residential, public support eacilities, residential treatment homes, fuming, manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary us us and accessory structures. Attached i0 the Site Plan cfli applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by Various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and 4 decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you Wish to comment on thia application, we need your comments by Dec. 12, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return :tour comments, If ou are unable to res ond b the abovedate please phone the staff contact net below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing aS soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have nO objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written ComMents: it of our office. h. tr, EAi vosemoimalhommomumaiiimeari...1. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number le 2 0- Sjii_ ..i.verasserrearroormo worsommennamanuarommowstrorma , EFSME-2 "R DATE: December 2 1994 FROM: rsard Planning Department EE: CONDITIONAL USE cup 94-0009 S . JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCAION: 11511 SW Bull Mounta n Road (WCTM 2S1 10BD, tax lot 100), A rtquest for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanctUary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility entry and an addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18,130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/acre) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, public support facilities, residential treatment hom s, farming. manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your eview. From information supplied by varimis departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, We need your comments by Dec. 120 1994. YoU may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to res ond the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your Comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,, Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .....47- . We have revieWed the proposal and haVe no objections to it. Please contact of our offiCe. Pleasedtefer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: phone Number: EggyasT VOR COMMTS 22,1.211Ath" DATE: December..24.2194L_________ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITION ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH LOCATION: 11511 SW Bull Mounta n Road (WCTM 2S1 1013D, tax lot 100). A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the addition of an acolytes preparation room and small chapel to an existing sanetuary, remodel of an existing parish hall for use as handicapped accessible offices and new facility nary and ah addition of a two story parish hall/sunday school wing. APPLICABLN REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.46, 18.100, 10.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: R-2 (Residential, 2 units/act'e) The R-2 zoning allows single family residential, pUblic support facilities, residential treatment homes, farmirvi Manufactured homes, family day cares, home occupations, temporary Uses and accessory structUres. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near fUture. If you wish to comment on this application, We need your comments by De. 12, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to respond the above date please phone the staff contact noted below w th your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13/25 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHEM< THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .7.V.L. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Nettie of Person Commenting: Phone NUmber: [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] 1111. " OALVIN N, isOuTHER • IsNUCE 0/*AuLOINo wILLIAM H. NotitotLy ; WAYNE A.WILLIAMISON amt; SCHWAS": +NEWELL WTATT OONDON MOoNe KENNETH E.NoSENTS IN3PINEST W. somMoNS • JAMES 0.13'HANLON • bOUOLAS M. THOMPSoN JAMES 11.MbORE . ALLAN tHANtite $1:1-ANo P taANKS„.)N, ()Mu PIEHETT6 ooltOLAS WHITE,ari. SOUTHER, SPAULDING, KINSEY, WH.LIANISON & SCHWASE krto Pi N SYS; Ar LAW k Niti(I tAh4scokfu. AtA flab s W b114 AVENUL, PORTLAN b, OREGON 97204 Trel.t/I,HONK 003-222.9961 APJLE ADDfrirsellotiCALH ploCILNE DILL JAMEs A LARPENTEUN,Js. JAMES H. sPIrtserIMAN ROSEST /3. SIMenoN rISO,PAIAV S.101 T,v, THOMAS M. TRIPLETT nostril. E.JOSEPK4n.. isTEHHEN EL HILL HAUL H. DAIGLE NOS ENT t. HUSTON KENNETH O. HENNES ENN ETH E. Ho /sems, JR. DONALD JOE WILLIs J. LAIMCNCS CAULt MICHAEL D. HOPPHAN JAMES O. HUE.31.,1 tiEtsir4y c.wiLLtivr.s eltity r Itnin MAW, wAluul# Juiii4 0, e. NANO MN). ,114 DON A. 41.oYD NtioA 1. CAMOSELL JOHN 000R A. LiJollit ROY 1),LAMISepr bAvio 14, McAOAmo; W. A. JENNY NONTH JAMES WALocioN 111)Hrio 1) /Inv I oN DAvIt) W. A)1111,013c; AN der4 L.NAGGer4re nrOrt -a. rintr.; to; HAN Hor11-1/1 ;ffl;11# r m e;)10 STEVEN #I tiknYi ObrIALO HAAOtN,"N POTH WAXMAN HOOrCP RALPH V. tiAktIENSEN ci.ixAttitTN ti. Oteve CHARLES R. MARKLtY OOlgtitt STOUT' DANIEL r, “Nok JAN 11 1)17(.1;r1 L. CLIWAI•n PAUI. NOVitl ritir The Reverend Jackson R. Hazelett, Rector St. James Episcopal Church P. O. Box 23033 Tigard, Oregon 97223 bear Pather Hazelett: Enclosed is the deed from the Diocese of Oregon to St. James Episcopal Church. This deed should be sent by you to the Washington "lUnty Recorder in Hillsboro for recording, When you get it back from the recorder, you shottld keep it with your other valuable papers. The recording fee is $7.00. P.S. Since this have to apply to of the tax roll. of March, 1980. represents a transfer of title, you will also the county Assessor to have the church taken This should be done between now and 1..ho and id (f 14t1.1' 4• in ;! ; ;'• ; ' "".;,!•, . ; •••••;1'.; Washington County Court House Recorder's Office 150 N. First Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Dear Sir: ' Please find euclosed the deed from the Diocese of Oregon, to St. James Episcopal Church to be recorded in Washington Coounty, also our chedk for 47.00 to covet,' the coat of filing. )•4•Vt?iteo4V60`,,i.d•itiVs;:ti t',Ii*; 4, 441501%4'; :.-t4,;;44-ii ; k [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]