Loading...
CUP1993-00001POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 0 INTERNATIONAL MINISTRY FELLOWSHIP P.O. Box 151 Clackamas, Oregon 97015 . (503) 657-4024 • 1-800447-4489 Vi Goodwin City of Tigard Development Services 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 RE: Conditional Use Approval CUP93-0001 Thank you for the letter remindiag us about the CU appro- val and conditions. At this time this project is not going forward because the pastor has resigned from the church. t hope to put the project back on line in about 6-8 months. Until that time we cannot move forward. If there is a time limit on this approval, please let us know. Thank you for your attention and helpfulness. Sincerely, Frank R. Wood FRW/vr INTERNATIONALMINISTRYIEELLOVISIII0 Serving Christ tind JEs Church tit DEVELOPERS DESIGNERS CONSIIRUCTION MANAGERS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard I, &V\\ ruAtieOeuiv,_, &A 1( depose and say: (Please print) That I am a6t,';',ekAlOr The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR /'That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Exhibit °A") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OP DWISION as here o bulletin board on the 1121 day of in the United Staten Mail on the pontage prepaid. AtL00.101("-' Prepared Notice Decision) of which in attached (Marked prkrnid3.a ir at th attachad, woan post 19 address shown o the l9 J, on an appropriate ; and depoited CITY OF TIGARD Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): CUP 93-0001LEOR 93-0003 2. Name of Owner: Ti ard Covenant Church Name of Applicant: Frank Wood 3. Address PO Box 151 4. Address of Property: Northeaat corner of SW Pacific Hishwav and SW Naeve Street Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2s1 10DB tax lot 300 5. Request: A request for PlannedAgmelpmentsgmmiauljezzLE02 for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre tate. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at his site. ROligious assemblies are allowed ae conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Eigmested. plan review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITBA.JA: Planned Development Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Dee Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 101 and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 78.150, and 18.164. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, rsst'ed at City Hall, and mailed to: 4 X The applicant and owner(s) X Owners of record within the required distance iL The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON May 17, 1993 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. ApIngall Any party to the decision may appeal Ois deCioion in accordance with 18.52.290(B) and Sectinn 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forma and Must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript Costa, (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. Agy12„...1922_ 10. gusymtios: If you have any vestions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. INUOCSONWEINEMMNINNEMONSAWNEMI CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO. 93 -09 PC • A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH /APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A PROPOSED CHURCH REQUESTED BY FRANK WOOD AND TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH. The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed the above application at a public hearing on May 3, 1993. The Commission has based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below. CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93 -0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 92 -0003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium -High Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -25 PD (Residential, 25 units per acre, Planned Development). LOCATION: northeast corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 251 10DB, tax lot 300) PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: Tigard Covenant Church 11545 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 Frank Wood PO Box 151 Clackamas, OR 97015 APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, 18.150, and 18.164, and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3,1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. A. FACTS 1, hmkgragndartfamnatign The subject parcel was annexed to the City of Tigard in 1981 (Boundary Commission order 1759, October 12, 1981) . Prior to annexation, the parcel was designated by Washington County with a zoning designation of RU-4 (Residential, 4 units /acre). City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 1481 approved redesi, Rtion of the parcels from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a zone change to R-12 (Residential, 12 units /acre). The Planned Development (PD) overlay zone was added to the requested R -12 designation so that all development proposals for the properties would be required to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, In December, 1986, the Tigard City Council gave conditional approval to the Albertson's Comprehensive Plan Amendment for changing the Plan designation of several properties located at the southeastern corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. This approval redesignated these properties from High Density Residential to General Commercial. A result of this decision was the removal of the opportunity for approximately 400 potential multi-family housing units from Tigard's inventory of vacant, buildable land. The Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660, Division 7) requires that Tigard provide a housing opportunity for at least 50 percent multi-family units and a net minimum housing density of 10 dwelling units per acre on vacant buildable land within the City's designated planning 'area. The Albertson's CPA was approved on the condition of redesignation of sufficient residential land to higher densities to make up for the housing opportunity shortfall created by the decision. Several sites throughout the city, including Tax Lot 300, were considered for increased residential densities to make up for the housing opportunity shortfall created by the Albertson's decision. Tax Lot 300 and the western half of the parcel to the east were propased for Plan/Zone redesignation from Medium Density Residential/R-12 (PD) to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 (PD) (Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 87-07(G)/Zone Change ZC 87-02 (G)). Redesignation of Tax Lot 300 and the adjacent parcel was approved by the City Council on April 13, 1987. No other land use or development applications have been considered for this site. 2. Eiginittaniquauasua The attached vicinity map illustrates zoning in the area of the subject property. Tice City Council and Planning Commission have approved the development of a 348 unit multi-family residential development immediately to the east (Triad Tigard SDR 91-0013/PDR 91-0006). The City Council's final decision on that proposal was appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.(LUBA). LUBA has recently remanded that decision to the city. Preliminary discussions with Triad Tigard's representatives indicate that Triad intends to continue to pursue the proposed, previously approved development through resubmittal of the application essentially unchanged. The property to the south of the subject site across SW Naeve Street is undeveloped. Kasch's nursery is located further to the south, The Fountains at Summerfield condominium development is located to the southeast along SW Naeve, although this development does not take direct access from SW Naeve Street. The subject property h-a approximately 480 feet of frontage on SW Naeve Street. SW Naeve Street is functionally classified as a local street. SW Naeve Street is generally substandard in width and state of improvements, with the exception of the frontage of the Fountains at Summerfield development to the east. Half-street improvements, including approximately 30 feet of pavement, curbs, a sidewalk, and streetlights have been installed along the Fountain's frontage. The approval for the proposed Triad apartment complex to the east was conditioned upon that deveLoper completing local street improvements on SW Naeve eastward to SW 109th Avenue. The subject Pacific has Highway � is ma 4 4-lane divided arterial. on SW Pacific F approximately Highway. left-turn lane is provided on Pacific Highway for southbound traffic onto SW Naeve Street. The intersection of SW Naeve Street and Pacific Highway is not signalized. The Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Plan Map provides for a future relocation of SW 109th Avenue to cut from northeast to southwest across the Triad site and across tax lots 400 and 700 to the south to connect up with SW Pacific Highway at a signalized intersection opposite SW Royalty Parkway. The upreliminary p this on do not directly affect the subject site, ex pt for anorthwa d realignment of SW Naeve Street in the southeast corner of the site. This realignment has been proposed to allow a better alignment of the two streF.ts' intersection. 3. a ion +and 4 0 : D'. lre i iQn The subject 5.7 acre property is vacant, covered with a combination of tall fir trees, lower height deciduous trees, and a significant amount of very dense underbrush. A very large oak tree is located along the site's SW Naeve Street frontage. Several large redwood trees are located in the southerstern corner of the site. The property slopes predominantly to the south and southwest at varying grades. Approximately 1.7 acres in the northeastern corner of the stte has a slope of greater than 20 percent. Tigard Church proposes to construct a 33,990 square foot church and a associated site improvements on this site The church is proposed to be developed in three phases. Phase one would include 9,990 square feet of classrooms, offices, and a multi - purpose room with 160 parking spaces. Phase two would include 60000 square feet including an enlargement of the multi - purpose room and classrooms. Phase: three would include a sanctuary to seat 800 to 9000 additional classrooms„ and additional parking to serve 202 vehicles. Access to the proposed parking areas would be provided off of SW Naeve Street, approximately 250 feet east of SW Pacific Highway. The parking to be included in p hase one would be located on the south side of the church. Four disabled person parking spaces would be provided. The parking lot and internal driveways are proposed to encircle the building when phase three is completed. B. AGENCY AND NPO COMMENTS The Oregon State Highway Division has commented that curbs, sidewitlks, storm drainage, seg a and pavement widening should be required along the tt"!' s SW Pacific Highway frontage. A construction permit will be required from °DOT . Tualatin Valley Fire District #1 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments Illiginnumnagmm • A fire hydrant is required within 250 feet of all portions of the structures measured around the outside and along access roadways. The plans did not include enough information to assess fire flow to the site Final fire hydrant locations will need to be reviewed and approved jointly by the Fire D'Latrict and Tigard Water District. Turning radii for fire vehicle access shall net be less than 25 foot inside diameter and 45 foot outside diameter. Plans should be submitted to the Fire District showing intended fife lanes through the parking area. The Tigard Water District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the frllowing comment: A fire hydrant(s) will need to be installed by the developer within 250 feet of all portions of the building. Also, if the building is to be equipped with fate sprinklers, a doable check detector assembly will need to be installed. direct access to this site The Pacific Highway st should bcommented llowed, and also that storm drainage from from the site should be directed to storm sewers on the east side of Pacific Highway. Tri -Het has commented that a direct pedestrian link should be added between the proposed church and Pacific Highway. The proposed plans require pedestrians arriving "rom the north to travel a significant of direction to reach the proposed building entrance. The distance out on SW Pacific Highway ay should be separated from the curb proposed to provide a buffer between pedestrians and high-speed traffic. General Telephone, y'ortland General Electric, and NPO #6 have reviewed skits proposal and have no offered no objections or comments. A letter was received from Douglas Co1emati, 15100 SW Crown Drive #6, King City, Itr. Coleman opposes the applicants' request due to the proposed development's likely effects on natural habitat. To other comments have been received. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Conditional_tise Section 18. 6 VI of the Comm the Rel zeonin district, religious Section ryr tonal use Community Development Code ratty Section assemblies as a condi i 18.56.020.$ states that approval of a conditional use is discretionary with the hearings officer. In this caee, however, the subject property is toned with the planned develcpment overlay zone. Section 18.8 ,915.0 States that in the case of an existing planned development overlay one for a conditional use application, the proposal shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the Planning Commission must review the current application under the applicable approval standards for both a conditional use and a planned development. Section 18,130.040 of the Code contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use 1. The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the mods of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2, The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal, 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5, The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (SIGNS) and Section 18.120.180 (APPROVAL STANDARDS) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan, Staff finds that the proposal to develop a church and associated site improvements on this site is consistent with these general conditional use approval criteria because: 1) the site plan illustrates that the 5,7 acre site has sufficient size and shape to accommodate the three proposed development phases including parking, landscaping, buffer yards, while still leaveing a significant portion of the site undeveloped; 2) there are no apparent physical obstacles to this use on the site. ThA development plan would provide for leaving the steepest, and presumably most difficult to develop, portion of the site undeveloped, There is no evidence of wetlands or other significant physical constraints to development on the site; 3) Comments from utility and service providers indicate that adequate public Utilities are available to serve the intended use; 4) Minimum building setbacks and lot coverage/landscaped area requirements of the underlying R-25 zone would all be satisfied by the development plan, except that the building height of the sanctuary to be built it phase three would be 66 feet in height (not including the cross) , Agattomalakaillul of the Code, however, exempts sites covered by the planned development overlay zone from height limit standards of the underlying zoning district in areas that are not within 100 feet of a designated established areas. This area is not within 100 feAt of a designated established area Therefore, no maximum building height applies and it is up to the Planning Commission to determine the appropriate building height for this site. Staff has no problem with • • height proposed; and 5) the proposed use will comply with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies shall be satisfied by this proposal, as described further below. Section 18,,130.15Q(C ( ) � .01 contains the following additional conditional use approval criteria for religious assembly use. The proposal's compliance with these standards follows each standard in parentheses. a. Lot Size: minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet. (The proposed development would have a 5.7 acre development site). b. Setbacks: i. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet. (The proposed front yard setback from SW Naeve Street is 160 feet) ; ii. On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meet visual clearance areas (Chapter 18.102); (The proposed minimum setback from SW Native Street is 160 feet; The proposed minimum setback from SW Pacific Avenue is 48 feet) iii. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet. (The minimum setback from the eastern property boundary is 49 feet); iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet. (The minimum setback from the northern property boundary is 270 feet); and w. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. (The ma ',mum building height is this subsection, All 66 feet per the Code's even increased per height defini ion, would P continue to bt satisfied.) As indicated, the proposed church development plan clearly greatly exceeds all lot area and setback requirements specified above. a „ re velpmen ... . ' provides p 4 for creating standards n . The environments through Chapter l8 $0 prow£ flexible develo m �n planned en purpose statement the application of development that it is the intent of this section to preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing landscape features and amenities through the use of site planning procedures that relate the type and desikn of a P � carries a Planted development to th e site, Since this development site c.arr Development designation, a general review of these standards is necessary. Code Section i8.8O.,.0 identifies approval criteria for a planned development si'.:e plan. hf particular .cular note with regard to the current, request is Section 18.80. buildings, _120.A 3,a which states; .. streets, b ldings, �'V�4� 4 v • ��'� and other site elements obeli be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography, and natural drainage to the greatest extent possible." In addition, this section also states thhath "the Knees with •• der7. 3 n a six inch caliper. . sell be saved as possible." y g zoning district allowing large scale multi- family developments as w,li as schools or churches, such as has been proposed, and the substantial slope of the site that needs to be graded to allow such a development, it would be very difficult if not impossible to allow these types of development without substantially altering the tree cover and existing topography. The application proposes a substantial amount of site grading and removal of almost all existing; trees on the southern two - thirds of the site in order to accomplish this development. However, the application provides for preservation the existing vegetation on the northern approximately one -third of the site and provides for retention of the very large maple (oak ?) tree at the entrance driveway from SW Naeve Streets The landscaping plan provides for a significant amount of replacement lower landscaping and trees which should provide for a relatively attractive development. Therefore, staff finds that the development plan makes a reasonable attempt at satisfying this criterion considering that the underlying zone provides for intensive development. A tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Division prior to site grading or any tree removal other than brushing.* The applicant should be requir.' =d to submit a complete tree survey for all areas to be disturbed prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit or grading permit. The applicant and staff should then endeavor to modify the site plan and public improvement plans, as practical, in Order to retain additional mature trees. Section , , 8 le120.A 3.b provides that planned development proposals shall be reviewed with regard to the adequacy of buffering and screening of a p ro po sed new development from surroundin g uses streets, In addition, Section ,130, 04 , . 0 permits the decision -making body an d itional ust application to require buffer yards, fences, or other measures that are determined to be necessary to rinimir .e impacts upon abutting uses, The buffer matrix of Code Se . ion 1BANAT2 dGes not directly apply to conditionally permitted uses and therefore it is up to the decision -maker to determine the appropriateness of the buffering and screening provided. The proposed development would be well 'ou£fered fjom neighboring uses to the south and west by streets,, and to the north and northeast by the large undeveloped wooded area that would be retained on this site. A six -foot tall sight obscuring fence and a hedge are proposed along the developed recommended additional Y or redwood trees be added to t It is portion of the una fir with the `Triad site to the east. he area recommended the between the driveway to be installed in phase two and the eastern property boundary to provide better buffering and screening for the property to the east. These additional trees should also be considered as replacements for some of the mature fir and redwood trees that will need to be removed to develop this site. Sections 18 80-120 A-3 c d and e refer to residential developments that are developed as planned developments These approval standards are le. Sections '4 are therefore inapplicable, .� -�� � y e uiretments of other Code Chapters dealing essentially referet� �es to the r q with access, landscaping, visual clearance, Signs, and parking. Findings "4 "a tee provided below relative to these Code Chapters should be considered tantamount to consistency to these planned development approval standards. Section $• SO.7- ?0 A,,,3 .h allows the approval authority to require the developer to provide facilities relative to public transit needs such as bus turn -outs or shelters, if the proposed development abuts a public transit route. SW Pacific Highway abutting the site is currently served by Tri -Met bus service. A Tri -Met bus shelter and bus turnout are already provided along SW Pacific Highway adjacent the site Tri -Met has not requested atv additional transit related improvements. Therefore, no additional tt. sit related facilities should be required as conditions of development ap ral. Section ,1$.z,$QJ,.Q4. (phased planned development) states that tho Commission shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases, but the shall not exceed seven years total time period .for a phased development without reapplying r conceptual plan review. The applicant's statement for that the church intends to complete all three phases of the site development within the next five years. Necessary public facilities will be made available in the first phase to serve the total development plan. Therefore, there should be no problem in approving the phased development plan to be completed within seven years of the commencement of development of phase one. Other COMP t = • ! Cdy.• Standards Community Development Co de Section 18.100.U141 (screening. special provisions) lists the specifications for providing screening f or parking and loading areas. The proposed landscaping plan indicates proposed plantings which will encircle the perimeter of the parking area. vegetation g _. is required to achieve a relative balance between low lying shrubbery and groundcovers, and vertical hedges and trees. In addition to the existing large maple tree which will be preserved, in excess of 30 new trees are proposed to be added to the parking area, not including street trees. This Code section requires that a minimum of 29 parking lot trees be provided for the ultimate total of 202 parking spaces (one tree for every seven spaces). The 30 plus new trees, plus the street trees, P r of parking lot trees required surpass the nunbe for this development. It is not clear, however, whether any low level plantings or berms are to be utilized on the southern or western property edges of the parking lot facing SW Naeve and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant should be required provide to su lemental information on low level plantings or berms along these site frontages that will be used to meet this standard. This additional information shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for phase one, than 100 feet in length hall Section 5.8.100.030 (street trees) requires that all developments fronting on a public street or private driveway a required to plant street trees in accordance required spacing itction lQ,1035 b q p Section of street trees). The minimum requir is 25 feet with p g applicant Pacific Hi hwa plant t street a maximum spacing of 40 feet The a licpant ro oses to la t treet trees along the site's frontages on SW Highway Street, although species of the street trees is landscaping plan must be for phase one to provide proposed street trees. • and planting size are not specified. The spacing shown as approximately 30 feet. Therefore, the revised prior to the issuance of building permits information on the type and planting size of the Code Section ittelaLWW require that refuse and recycling facilities be screened from views from other properties and from streets by use of an evergreen hedge, masonry' wall, or solid wood fence. The plans indicate that a refuse storage area would be located in the southeastern cornet of the site near the SE Naeve Strret /SW 109th intersection. No details are provided on screening of the refuse facilities other than some landscaping in the general area. The applicant should be required to provide details on the screening of this fleility. Section .18.,102.020 (visual clearance) requires that a visual eiearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right -of -ways. This proposal will create one driveway onto SW Naeve Street. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing large maple tree near the driveway and place a sign just to the north of the tree. Deciduous trees are allowed to be planted (or in this case, retained) within the vision clearance area as long as the tree is kept limbed up to intersection, Theq proposed sign, however, would eight feet in heigt to provide for adequate vision g' clearance for th driveway/right-of-way p appear to slightly intrude into the required clear vision are The sign will need to be slightly relocated. Details on sign placement can be worked out at the time of sign permit application. Therefore, this Code section regarding vision clearance is satisfied. Section ! 8.106 .031i_._B 9 (minimum off - street parking) requires that at one parking space be provided for every six fixed seats, or every 12 feet of bench length in the assembly area, or every 100 square feet of gross floor area in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever is greater. The proposed multi- purpose room seats approximately 3,900 square feet of assembly area, with no eats despite the floor plans seating layout an • and statement of room capacity of 356. The assembly area calculation yields a parking en if the requirement City of 39 were use 356 spaces development of phase one. person room capacity statement and )ne space per six seat standard, only sixty parking spaces would be req+vi ed. The proposal would provide 160 parking spaces with phase one, with 42 spaces to be added with phase three development. The Code would permit up to 25 percent of the proposed parking spaces to be compact parking stalls. No compact . s pa ces are currently oposed, although the applicant may utilize this allowance in subsequent plan revision., if necessa ry . The site plan provides for four disabled, person parking spaces to be located near the church's main entrance. Tigard a Community Development Code P comply with the p de requires than developments standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for required disabled person parking spaces. ADA requires the provision of four • disabled person parking stalls for a parking lot of this size. Therefore, all applicable automobile parking space requirements have been satisfied. Section ,].106.020. P, (bicycle parking requirements) states that 1 bicycle parking space is required for each 15 automobile parking spaces. The applicant has not indicated the provision of any bicycle parking on the site plan. Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to provide for a minimum of 11 bicycle parking spaces with development of phase one, and 14 total bicycle parking spaces with development of phase three auto parking. Section x,8,,106,050 0 (parking lot aisle width) requires that aisles accorilodating two direction traffic shall have a minimum width of 24 feet. All proposed parking lot aisles are consistent with this standard, except f'or the short section of parking lot driveway which would parallel the eastern property line. This aisle is proposed to be 20 feet wide. The site and landscaping plan should be revised to provide a minimum 24 foot wide aisle in this area. It is noted that compact parking spaces adjacent to this aisle may make this requirement easier to comply with Section 18,l08,050.(required walkway location) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the primary ground floor entrances to the streets which provide the required access and egress. The site plan does not propose any pedestrian walkways extending from the main entrance of the structure to either SW Naeve Street or SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, the site and landscaping plans should be revised to provide for a convenient hard - surfaced pedestrian connection between SW Naeve and the church with phase one development, and between SW Pacific Highway and the church with phase three development, Section 11,108 , 082 (access and circulation) states that if more that 100 parking spaces are required, the minimum access width for a single access shall be 30 feet. The proposed church would provide for far in excess of 100 parking spaces. Therefore, the required paved width for the access driveway is 40 feet. A 36 foot wide dri driveway to SW Naeve Street is proposed. This driveway will therefor e n to be widened slightly. Section 18,134.130,B.1.d (signs) regulates the size of freestanding signs for non- residential uses in the R -25 zoning district, A 32 square foot, six foot tall monument sign is permitted in this zone for non - residential use, A 60 square foot, seven foot tall monument sign is shown on the p Therefore, the proposed sign is not an acceptable size landscaping lan. There£gor F must _ p height. Revised sign plans must therefore be developed that ate consistent with Code maximum size and height standards, as well as location relative to clear vision previously Wall vision areas as reviousl mentioned. signs also may be permitted for this use on this site. A sign permit will need to be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on this site, Chapter j6.l52 (tree removal) lists the criteria for approving tree removal. Chapter 1145o w ill be satisfied because the applicant will be required to obtain a tree removal permit prior to removing trees over 6 inches in caliper size in preparation for development. Permits will be p � only it is found necessary' to remove the other trees to accommodate necessary te granted e y sidewalks, utilities, or structures, roadways, plan and grading improvements. It should be clear from the review most of the plans and $la plan that this will require the removal radin rahich must occur. the site due to the significant amount of grading special effort should be taken to retain remove undergrowth Nevertheless, l applicant should be allowed to rem tress as possible. The app permit. The applicant and small trees that do not require a tree of all trees within the pardon should then prepare a detailed tree survey be developed. The tree survey should then be used by the y public improvement of the 1 site to City view the site plan and p applic�.�nt and Cit staff to re plans can be made plans in order to determine whether ns. to The City's Engineeriri� to retain additional existing mater Department of should be directed to be flexible in r n ewin effort to gsavf public improvements such as sidewalk locations existing trees. Section 18 g.QaO.A.l.a (streets) states that streets adjacent to a development shall be improved in accordance with the standards of Chapte 18.164. Section imsAAnial (minimum r$ghts -of -way a nd p ) SW Pacific the regulations pertaining to street standards. S contains regulations The minimum widthostandards for an arterial are 30 feat of right -of -way and 20 feet Highway is classified as an arterial. meet from y pavement for SW Pacific centerline hp rlinne as well as curb and sidewalk. The. r g t~ n mum riSW Pacific is Highway adjacent to this site far exceeds orn f required as a c dard• therefore no additional tight -of a ayashou be a s the need to condition of development Approval. The site p and install a story sewer widen the roadway, install curbs and sidewalk, Pacific High` /ay frontage consistent with minimum along SW plan, however, proposes improvement standards. The site p P standards call for an eight-foot wide Sidewalk whereas the City's such as Pacific highway. The plans sidewalk along arterial be revised accordingly, Street classified as a local street. The minimum feet SW Naeve ,,treeL is standards for a local street are 25 feet and right-of-way rlawalkwaThe right -of -way from centerline as Well as curb pavement Naeve Street. adjacent scent to this site is 20 i feet from rwayshould centerline; therefore five additional feet of additional right-of way should be eeba for SW N condition of development con f additions r g t- approval, rather required to be dedicated as a than the ten additional feet of dedication the applicant's s site plan calls install for The site plan recognizes the need to widen the roadw y, d install a storm sewer along the SW Naeve Street curbs and sidewalk, ..a the minimum mpro�riement standards. frontage consistent with g ion of the eastern portion of SW Naeve Street The timing of the construction may be difficult to coordina� the with Naeve across the site's g. it". Parkway connection and e e viired with development of the Triad eat should construction wouldhb l q Street that by g n e i g forging ahead conditions of a p recommended b them while g Dn arm with the co approval recom�ne . S � Street can be kept oP licante should with the work W plsnne that improvements for this area. The app nstld work i this planned Engineering Department and Triad to coordixiate co street. It should be understood that it may become' necessary for some deviation from the stated conditions of approval related to SW Naeve Street construction to occur depending on how things work out in coordinating the work of all involved parties. Based on the testimony received at the May 3, 1993 hearing and the above noted difficulties in coordinating the construction of SW Naeve Street and 109th, the Planning Commission agreed to delay improvements east of the church driveway entrance until. Phase III or the improvement of 109th whichever comes first. Code section 18.164.030 c. allows acceptance of future improvement guarantee if a partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards. The Commission also agreed to delay improvements on Highway 99W until Phase III of the church development. Code Section 11,164&N, provides a variety of detailed standards for the design and improvement of public streets. The preliminaty improvement plans shown on the site and utilities plans appear consistent with all applicable standards, Detailed public improvement plans will need to be prepared in response to the conditions of approval. Detailed plans will need to be developed consistent with the standards of this Code section. Section 21,164,Qm (sanitary sewers) requires that new developments be served by sanitary sewers and that necessary sanitary sewer improvements or extensions be approved by the City gngineer. The utility plan appropriately provides for an eight inch diameter sanitary sewer extension to serve the proposed church from an existing line along the western edge of the Fountains at Summerfield development. Section 18,164.100 (storm drainage) requires that adequate provisions for storm water drainage and disposal be provided for any new deVelopment. The proposal includes plans for a stormwater collection system, on-site water quality facilities, storm sewers along both street frontages, and drainage to an existing storm sewert on SW Naeve Street, The engineering Diviaion's review of the preliminary plans for these facilities finds that these should provide necessary site drainage consistent with this Code Section, • As noted above, Community Development Code Section nj„30A4/ requires that conditional use proposal's be demonstrated to comply with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. Staff finds that the proposed church development complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies as follows: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because WP() #6 has been informed of the proposal and has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. In addition, notice of the public hearing and the opportunity to comment on the proposal has been sent to nearby property oWners. 4. • ". • 7%, * 4.■ " • ; ' „ , , • "' , 1 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state, and regional water quality standards. In order to comply with this policy, a condition ia warranted to require the applicant to stiomit an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with erosion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application and to develop. on-site water quality facilities as required by the USA regulations for the Tualatin River basin. The site plan notes that storm water detention facilities will be constructed, although no details are provided. The applicant should be required to develop plans for on-site storm water quality facilities for review and approval of the Engineering Department. 3. Policies 7.1.2 and 7.4.4 provide that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. This conditional use application development proposal complies with Policies 7.12, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public sewer, storm sewer, and water systems to this site and will be required to provide for underground installation of telephone and electricity lines along the site's frontages. 4. Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Also, Policy 8.1.3 provides the City will require as a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated access; street or has other adequate dedicated where the street is c. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development. d. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalki to the extent of the development's impacts; Street improvemetts,shall be made and street signs or signals Shall be provided when the development is foUtd to create or intensify a traffic hazard. 4 This application complies with Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the public streets adjoinitg this site will be required to be consistent with City of Tigard and Oregon State Highway Division road improvement standards. The street and access plans do not appear to raise any significant Safety ot capacity concerns. ' III. CONCLUSION • Based on the above findings of consistency with the applicable approval standards for a conditional use and planned development, it is concluded that this proposed development application by the Tigard Covenant Church will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided development that occurs complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. Therefore, it is recommended that the City of Tigard Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit CUP 93-0001/Planned Development Review PDR 93-0002 regarding tax lot 300 of WCTM 251 10DB subject to the conditions which follow: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE MET PRIOR TO THE I3SUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR AV., CONDITIONS SHALL BE CHRIS DAVIES, ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1, The site and landscaping plans shall be revised to accommodate the following: a. Sidewalks shall be no less than eight feet in width along SW Pacific Highway; b. The proposed sl.gn at the entrance driveway shall be relocated outside of the required vision clearance area The sign size proposed on the site plan is not permitted. Freestanding sign size and height for this use shall 'be consisitent with Code Section 18.1.14,132,21,ALs allowances for freestanding sizes for non- residential uses; c. An two-way internal access driveways or parking lot aisles shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width; d, The access driveway to SW Naeve Street shall be revised to a nminimum width of 40 feet; e. The site plan shall be revised to provide for a minimum of 11 bicycle parking spaces with development of phase one and 14 total bicycle parking spaces with development of phase three auto parking. f. The plans should be revised to provide for a convenient hard- surreced pedestrian connection between SW Naeve and the church with phase one development; and between SW Pacific Highway and the church with r%ase three development. Supplemental information on the type and planting size of the proposed street trees as well aS low leve7 plantings or berms along the Site's street frontages shall be provided. Additional fir or redwood trees shall be planted along the eastern edge of the proposed parking lot, Details shall be provided regarding the required screening of trash and recycling facilities • . , • • A LEGIBILITY STRIP oil to Revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Approval of these plans shall constitiute the detailed planned development plan approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. 2. No construction vehicles shall access or depart the site via SW Naeve Street to the east) or SW 109th Avenue except with prior approval of the City Engineer. Approval for exceptions will be given only if the applicant can show that there is no practical alternative for access. Parking of construction vehicles on SW Naeve Street shall be limited to the site frontage and shall comply with all existing regulations as to location and duration of parking. No construction materials shall be stored within the rights of way of SW Naeve Street or Pacific Highway at any time. Construction vehicles means the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of the site improvements or buildings proposed under this application and shall include the vehicles of their suppliers and employees. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Schreindl, Code Enforcement Officer, 639 -4171. 3. A tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Division before removal of any trees in excess of 6 inches in diameter. Prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant shall have a detailed tree survey prepared showing the type, size, and location of all trees with a caliper of 6 inches or greater. The applicant and City staff shall review the site plan and tree survey with regard to whether any minor modifications to the site plan may be made in order to retain additional existing trees. The planning Division stay require the applicant to provide for an arborist' s report and recommendations regarding trees that may be reasonably retained and protective measures for those trees. The Planning Division or the applicant's arborist may prescribe protective measures for the trees a measures must be remain in trees to be retained. These place throughout construction activities on the site STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, 4, Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along accessways. Building construction must be upgraded or automatic sprinkler protection must be provided, All plans for the water system and fire hydrants shall be g Water District and through, and approved by the Tigard 'Wate t,00rdinated throw Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, The applicant shall be P responsible sible for the Fire and Water Districts providing the City with assurance that this condition of approval has been satisfied. 5, Turning radii for fire vehicle access shall not be less than 25 foot inside diameter and 45 foot outside diameter. Plans should be submitted to the Tualatin Valley Fireand Rescue District showing intended fire lapses through the parking area: The applicant shah be responsible for the Fire District providing the City with assurance that this condition of approval has been satisfied, 6, All recommended conditions of approval provided by the attached City of p Tigard Engineering Department's report she ll be made conditions of development approval with the exception of a and b below, STAFF CONTACT Chris Davies, 4 LEG BIliTY STRiP a. SW Naeve Street shall be improved for the westerly frontage of the church site from and including the driveway entrance according to the attached Engineering Department report. Improvement of SW Naeve east of the church driveway shall be tied to building permits for Phase III or improvements to SW 109th whichever comes first. b. Improvements to the Highway 99W frontage shall be provided or financially secured prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase III. UNLESS A SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IS POSTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: 7. Sign permits shall be obtained from the Planning Division prior to the installation of any signs on the site which are intended to be seen from the public right-of-way or other parcels. STAFF CONTACT: The Planning Division. 8, The proposed landscaping materials and other proposed tite improvements shall be installed in substantial conformance with the approved site and landscaping plans. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning, Division. APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID IF BUILDING PERMIT PLANS ARE ISSUED AND SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION ON PHASE ONE IS COMMENCED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. PHASE TWO AND THREE CONSTRUCTION ARE APPROVED SO LONG AS THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ALL PHASES IS NO GREATER THAN SEVEN YEARS. It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This Tigard, day of May, 1993, by the Planning Commission of the City of ir Ht Atirf !I .017 ident Tigare anning Commission -41 . • THE FOUNTAINS AT SUMMERFIELD CONDOMINIUMS FRANK WOOD PO BOX 151 CLACKAMAS OR 97015 , • • i • AGENDA ITEM 5 .1 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 1993 - 7:30 PM TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93 -0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 92-0003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium -High Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R -25 PD (Residential, 25 units per acre, Planned Development). LOCATION: northeast corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Nave Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB0 tax lot 300) PROPERTY OWNER: Tigard Covenant Church /1545 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 APPLICANT: Frank Wood PO Box 151 Clackamas, OR 97015 APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 13.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, 18.150, and 18.164; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. A. FACTS 1. B ckground Information The subject parcel was annexed to the City of Tigard in 1981 (Boundary Commission order 1759, October 12, 1981). Prior to annexation, the parcel was designated by Washington County with a zoning designation of RU -4 (Residential, 4 units /acre). City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Revision CPR 1 -81 approved redesignation of the parcels from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and a zone change to R -12 (Residential, 12 units /acre). The Planned Development (PD) overlay zone was added to the requested R -12 designation so that all development proposals Commission. roperties would be required to be reviewed by the Planning In December, 1986, the Tigard City Council gave conditional approval to the Albertson's Comprehensive Plan Amendment for oruthea�e corner of f designation of several properties located at the o changing the Plan DurhamA Road and Pacific Highway. to Genera al redesignated these ific Highway. approval properties from High •y l CO mercial. A result of this decision was potential the removal of the opportunity Tigar inventory for approximately ory of vacant, tial multi family housin units from buildable land. Metropolitan Administrative Ruled, Chapter 660, The 7) re HireSn that 1Tigard prov g (Oregon . housing y 50 percent y... and a net minimum opportunity for at ].east 50 rc®ntmu3.ti faanil units v de a oud housing density of 10 dwelling units per acre on vacant buildable land within the City's designated planning area The lbertsOn's CPA was approved on the condition of redesignation of sufficient residential land to higher denditied to make up for the housing opportunity shortfall 4. • wy created by the decision. Several sites throughout the city, including Tax Lot 300, were considered for increased residential densP-ies to make up for the housing opportunity shortfall created by the Albertson' S decision. Tax Lot 300 and the western half of the parcel to the east were proposed for Plan/Zone redesignation from Medium Denaity Residential/R-12 (PD) to Medium-High Density Reoidential/R-25 (PD) (Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 87-07(G)/Zone Change ZC 87-02 (G)). Redesignation of Tax Lot 300 and the adjacent parcel was approved by the City Council on April 13, 1987. No other land use or development applications have been considered for this site. 2. DclinitYLa&IMARtiall The attached vicinity map illustrates zoning in the area of the subject property. The City Council and Planning Commisoion have approved the development of a 348 unit multi-family residential development immediately to the east (Triad Tigard SDR 91-0013/PDR 91-0006). The City Council's final decision on that proposal was appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.(LUBA). LUBA has recently remanded that decision to the city. Preliminary discussions with Triad Tigard'e representatives indicate that Triad intends to continue to pursue the proposed, previously approved development through resubmittal of the application essentially unchanged. The property to the south of the subject site across SW Naeve Street is undeveloped. Reach's nursery is located further to the south. The Fountains at Summerfield condominium development is located to the southeast along SW Naeve, although this development does not take direct access from SW Naeve Street. The subject property has approximately 480 feet of frontage on SW Naeve Street. SW Naeve Street is functionally classified as a local street. SW Move Street is generally substandard in width and state of improvements, with the exception of the frontage of the Fountains at Summerfield development to the east. Half-street improvements, including approximately 30 feet of pavement, curbs, a sidewalk, and streetlights have been installed along the Fountain's frontage. The approval for the proposed Triad apartment complex to the east was conditioned upon that developer completing local street improvements on SW Naeve eastward to SW 109th Avenue. The subject parcel had approximately 565 feet of frontage on SW Pacific Highway. Pacific Highway is a 4-lane divided arterial. A left-turn lane is provided on Pacific Highway for southbound traffic onto SW Naeve Street. The intersection of SW Naeve Street and Pacific Highway is not signalized. The Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Plan Map provides for a future relocation of SW 109th Avenue to cut from northeast to southwest across the Triad site and across tax lots 400 and 700 to the south to connect up with SW Pacific Highway at a signalized intersection opposite SW Royalty Parkway. The preliminary plane for this road section do not directly affect the subjech site, except ft= a northward realignment of SW Naeve Street in the southeast corner of the site. This realignment has been proposed to allow a better alignment of the two etreets' intersection. 3. Site Information and arlantam The subject 5.7 acre property 10 vacant, covered with a combination of tall fir trees, lower height deciduous trees, and a significant amount of STAFF REPORT CUP 93-012/PDR 93-03 IGA OVENANT CHURCH PAGE 2 very dense underbruoh. A very large oak tree is located along the :Ate's) SW Naeve Street frontage. Several large redwood trees are located in the southeastern corner of the site. The property elopes predominantly to the south and southwest at varying grades. Approximately 1.7 acres in the northeastern corner of the site has a slope of greater than 20 percent. Tigard Covenant Church proposes to construct a 33,990 square foot church and associated site improvements on this site. The church is proposed to be developed in three phases. Phase one would include 9,990 square feet of claesrooms, offices, and a multi-purpose room with 160 parking spaces. Phase two would include 6,000 square feet including an enlargement of the multi-purpose room and classrooms. Phase three would include a sanctuary to seat 800 to 900, additional clansroome, and additional parking to serve 202 vehicles. Access to the proposed parking areas would be provided off of SW Naeve Street, approximately 250 feet east of SW Pacific Highway. The parking to be included in phase one would be located on the south side of the church. Four disabled person parking spaces would be provided. The parking lot and internal driveways are proposed to encircle the building when phase three is completed. 49 B. AGENCY AND NPO COMMENTS The Oregon State Highway Division has commented that curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, and pavement widening should be required along the site's SW pacific Highway frontage. A construction permit will be required from ODOT. Tualatin Valley Fire District #1 hag reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: A fire hydrant is required within 250 feet of all portions of the structures measured around the outside and along access roadways. The plans did not include enough information to assess fire flow to the Elite. Final fire hydrant locations will need to be reviewed and approved jointly by the Fire District and Tigard Water District. Turning radii for fire vehicle accost; shall not be lees than 25 foot inside diameter and 45 foot outside diameter. Plans should be submitted to the Fire District showing intended fire lanes through the parking area. The Tigard Water District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment: A fire hydrant(s) will need to be installed by the developer within 250 feet of all portions of the building. Also, if the building is to be equipped with fire sprinklera, a double Check detector assembly will need to be inetalled. The City of King City has commented that no direct access to this Site from Pacific Highway should be allowed, and also that storm drainage from the site should be directed to Store: sewers on the east side of Pacific Highway. Tri,-Met has commented that a direct pedestrian link should be added between the proposed church and Padifid Highway. The proppeed plane require pedestrians arriving from the north to traVel a significant distance Out of direction to reach the proposed building entrance. The STAFF REPORT CUP 93-012/P1R 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 3 proposed sidewalk on SW Pacific Highway should be separated from the curb to provide a buffer between pedestrians and high-speed traffic. General Telephone, Portland General Electric, and NPO #6 have reviewed this proposal and have no offered no objections or comments. A letter was received from Douglaa Coleman, 15100 SW Crown Drive #6, King City. Mr. Coleman opposes the applicants' request due to the proposed development's likely effects on natural habitat. No other comments have been received. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUPIONS Conditional Use Section 18.56.040.A of the Community Development Code lists religious assemblies as a conditional use in the R-25 zoning district. Section likujjagat states that approval of a conditional use is diocretionary with the hearings officer. In this case, however, the subject property is zoned with the planned development, overlay zone. Section 18.80.015,C states that in the case of an existing planned development overlay zone for a conditional use application, the proposal shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the Planning Commission must review the current application under the applicable approval standards for both a conditional use and a planned development. Section 111,120,040 of the Code contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimeneions provide: a. Adequate area for the needa of the proposed user/ and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the urge on surrounding propeeties and USeS. 2. The characteristice of the site are euitable for the proposed use considering size, ehape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning diotrict are met except ad modified by this chapter. 5. The Supplementary requirements net forth in Chapter 18.114 (SIGNS) and Section 18.120.180 (APPROVAL STANDARDS) Site Development Review, if applicable; are met. 6. The use Will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds that the proposal to develop a church and associated site improvements on this site is consistent with these general conditional uSe approVal criteria because: 1) the site plan illustrates that the 5.1 acre site haeir sufficient size and shape to accommodate the three proposed development phases inclUding parking; landscaping, buffer yaeds, while STAFF REPORT CUP 93 012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 4 etell leeeing a significant portion of the site undeveloped; 2) there are no apparent physical obstacles to this use on the :ate. The development plan would provide for leaving the steepest, and presumably moat diA" cult to develop, portion of the site undeveloped There is no evidence of wetland° or other significant physical censtraints to development en the site; 3) Comments from utility and service providers indicate that adequate public utilities are available to serve the intended uoe; 4) Minimum building setbacks and lot coverage/landscaped area requirements of the underlying R-25 sone would all be satisfied by the development plan, except that the building height of the sanctuary to be built in phase three would be 66 feet in %eight (not including the cross). gelit0A1L i8. D0MIle/of the Code, however, exempts sites) covered by the planned development ti'earlay zone from height limit standards of the underlying zoning district in areas that are not within 100 feat of a designated established avow. This area is not within 100 feet of a designated established area. Therefore, no maximum building height applies and it Le up to the Planning Commission to determine the appropriate building height for this site. Staff has no problem with height proposed; and 5) the proposed use will comply with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies shall be satisfied by this propeaal, as doecribed further below. Section aalljjyl(gLLkll contains the following additional conditional use approval criteria for religioue asoembly use. The proposal's compliance with these standards follow:I each etandard in parentheses. a. Lot Size: minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet. (The proposed development would have a 5.7 acre development site). b. Setbacks: L. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet. (The proposed front yard setback from SW Naeve Street is 160 feet); Li. On corner lots and through :iota, he setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet, plus meet vieual clearance are (Chapter 18.102); The proposed minimum setba kfrom S NaeVe Street le 160 feet; The proposed minimum estbeck from SIR Pacific Avenue is 48 feet) The aide yard setback ohall be a minimum of 20 feet. (The minimum setback from the eastern property boundary is 49 feet); L. The rear yard setback ehall be a minimum of 20 feet. (The minimum eetback from the northern property boundary Le 210 feet); and v Each setback shall be increased five felt for every 10 feet Of building height over 45 feet. (The maximum building height is 66 feet par the Code'e building height definition. Al). eetbacke, even if increased per this subsection, would continue to be satisfied.) An indicated, the propoeed church development plan clearly greatly exceeds all lot area and setback requirements specified above, sTArr REPORT COP 93-012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD Commtit =nen PAGE 5 :•*c • ' "'" 4188k Planned Development Chapter 18.80 provides a process for creating planned environments through the application of flexible development standards. The purpose statement notes that it is the intent of this section to preserve to the greatest extent possible the ,existing landscape features and amenities through the use of eite planning procedures that relate the type and design of a development to the site. Since this development eite carries a Planned Development designation, a general review of these standards is necessary. Code Section 18.80.120 identifies approval criteria for a planned development site plan. Of particular note with regard to the current request is Section 18.80.120.A.3.a which states: ... streets, buildings, and other site elements obeli be designed and located to preserve the existing trees, topography, and natural drainage to the greatest extent possible." In addition, this section also states that "... trees with a six inch caliper... shall be saved as poseible." With the underlying zoning district allowing large scale multi-family developments as well ail schools or churchea, such an has been proposed, and the substantial slope of the site that needs to be graded to allow such a development, it would be very difficult if not impooeible to allow these types of development without substantially altering the tree cover and existing topography. The application proposes a substantial amount of site grading and removal of almost all exiating trees on the southern two-thirds of the site in order to accomplish this development. However, the application provides for preservation the existing vegetation on the northern approximately one-third of the site and provides for retention of the very large maple (oak?) tree at the entrance driveway from SW Heave Street. The landscaping plan provides for a significant amount of replacement lower landscaping and trees which should provide for a relatively attractive development. Therefore, staff finds that the development plan makes a reasonable attempt at satisfying this criterion, considering that the underlying zone provides for intensive development. A tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Division prior to site grading or any tree removal other than brushing. The applicant should be required to submit a complete tree survey for all areas to be disturbed prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit or grading permit. The applicant and staff should then endeavor to modify the site plan and public improvement plans, as practical, in order to retain additional mature trees. Section 18.80.120.A.3.b provides that planned development proposals shall be reviewed with regard to the adequacy of buffering and screening of a proposed new development from surrounding used and streets. In addition, Section 18.130.040.c permits the decision-making body for a conditional use application to require buffer yards, fences, or other measures that are determined to be necessary to minimize impacts upon abutting uses. The buffer matrix of Code Section 18.100.130 does not directly apply to conditionally permitted uses and therefore it is up to the decision-maker to determine the appropriateness of the buffering and screening provided. The proposed development would be well buffered from neighboring uses to the south and welt by streets, and to the north and northeast by the large undeveloped wooded area that would be retained on this site. A six-foot tall sight obscuring fence and a hedge are proposed along the developed portion of the site's boundary with the Triad site to the east. It is recommended that additional fir or redwood trees be added to the area between the driveway to be installed in phase two and the eastern property boundary to provide better buffering and screening for the property to the eaet. These additional trees should alba be considered as replacements for some of the mature fir and redwood trees that will need to be removed to develop this site. STAPo REPORT CUP 93 012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 6 4 „. • • , • glianatingrajeBULXIEFIff • Sections e_ipecLese refer to residential developments that are developed as planned developments. These approval standards are therefore inapplicable. Sections Mie_82a2i.e..f.-e-W4.....end k are essentially references to the requirements of other Code Chapters dealing with access, landscaping, visual clearance, signs, and parking. Findings provided below relative to these Code Chapters should be considered tantamount to consistency to these planned development approval standards. Section 18.80.120.A.3.h allows the approval authority to require the developer to provide facilities relative to public transit needs such as bus turn-outs or shelters, if the proposed development abuts a public transit route. SW Pacific Highway abutting the site is currently served by Tr-Net bus service. A Tri-Met bus shelter and bus turnout are already provided along SW Pacific Highway adjacent the site. Tri-Met has not requested any additional transit related improvements. Therefore, no additional transit related facilities should be required as conditions of development approval. Section 18.80.100 (phased planned development) states that the Commission shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases, but the total time period for a phased development shall not exceed seven years without reapplying for conceptual plan rview. The applicant's statement indicates that the church intends to complete all three phases of the site development within the next five years. Necessary public facilities will be made available in the first phase to serve the total development plan. Therefore, there should be no problem in approving the phased development plan to be completed within seven years of the comMencement of development of phase one. her CommunitUliwel0EM.W.t!g2411-akelaktE42 Community Development Code Section 18.100.110 (ecreening: special •••••••• provisions) lists the epecifications for providing screening for parking and loading areas. 7he proposed landscaping plan indicates proposed plantings which will encircle the perimeter of the parking area. This vegetation is required to achieve a relative balance between low lying shtubbery and groundccesers, and vertical hedges and trees. In addition to the existing large maple tree which Will be preserved, in excess of 30 new trees are proposed to be added to the parking area, not including street trees. This Code scion requires that a minimum of 29 parking lot trees be provided for the ultimate total of 202 parking spaces (one tree for every seven spaces). The 30 plus new trees, plus the street trees, surpass the number of parking lot trees required for this development. It is not clear, however, whether any low level plantings or berms are to be utilized on the southern er western property edge° of the parking lob facing SW Naeve and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant should be required to provide supplemental information on low level plantings or berms along these site frontaged that will be used to meet this standard. This additional information shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for phase one. Section 18.100.030 (street trees) requires that all developmento fronting on a public street or private di iveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035 (location of street treed). The minimum teqUited spacing is 25 feet with a maxim= spacing of 40 feet. The applicant proposes to plant street trees along the site's frontages on SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street, although species and planting size are not specified. The spacing of the street trees is shown ad approximately 30 feet. thtireforei the landscaping plan must be revised prior to the issuance of building permits STAFF REPORT CUP 93,4112/PDR. 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 7 *-" • : • ' . . an for phase one to provide information on the type and planting size of the proposed street trees. Code Section 188100.110.3 and .D require that refuse and recycling facilities be screened from views from other properties and from streets by use of an evergreen hedge, masonry wall, or solid wood fence. The plans indicate that a refuee storage area would be located in the southeastern corner of the site near the SE Reeve Strret/SW 109th intersection. No details are provided on screening of the refuse facilities other than some landscaping in the general area. The applicant should be required to provide details on the screening of this facility. Section 10.102.020 (visual clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right-of-ways. This proposal will create one driveway onto SW Naeve Street. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing large maple tree near the driveway and place a sign just to the north of the tree. Deciduous trees are allowed to be planted (or in this case, retained) within the vision clearance area as long as the tree ie kept limbed up to eight feet in height to provide for adequate vision clearance for the driveway/right-of-way intersection. The proposed sign, however, would appear to slightly intrude into the required clear vision are. The sign will need to be slightly relocated. Details on Sign placement can be worked out at the time of sign permit application. Therefore, this Code section regarding vision clearance is eatiefied. Section 10.106.030.0.9 (minimum off-atreet parking) requires that one parking apace be provided for every six fixed seats, or every 12 fee t of bench length in the assembly area, or every 100 square feet of gross floor area in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever iS greater. The proposed multi-purpose room contains approximately 3,900 square feet of assembly area, with no fixed seats despite the floor plans seating layout and statement of room capacity of 356. The assembly area calculation yields a parking requirement of 39 parking spaces with development of phase one. Even if the city to were use the 356 person room capacity statement and one space per six seat standard, only sixty parking spaced would be required. The proposal would provide 160 parking spaces with phasic) one, with 42 spaces to be added with phase three development. The Code would permit up to 25 percent of the proposed parking spaces to be compact parking stal/sh No compact spaces are currently proposed, although the applicant may utilize this allowance in any subsequent plan revisions, if necessary. The /Ate plan provides for four disabled person parking spaces to be located near the church's main entrance. Tigard's Community Development Code requires that developmentd comply with the standards of the Americana with Disabilities Act (ADA) for required disabled person parking spaces. ADA requires the provision of four disabled person parking stalls for a parking lot of this size. Therefore, all applicable automobile parking space requirements have been satiOfied. Section 184106.020.P (bicycle parking requirements) states that 1 bicycle parking space is required for each 15 automobile parking spaces. The applicant has not indicated the provision of any bicyCle parking on the Site plan. Therefore, the site plan with be revised to provide for a minimum of 11 bicycle parking spaces with development of phase one and 14 total bicycle parking spaces with development of phase three auto parking. • 0. STAPP REPORT CUP 93-012/PDR 93-03 TI4ARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 0 4., 1 , '', • ;'1,, ; Section 18.106.050.q (parking lot aisle width) requires that aisles accommodating two direction traffic shall have a minimum width of 24 feet. All proposed parking lot aisles are consistent with this st ndard, except for the short section of parking lot driveway which would parallel the eastern property line. This aisle is proposed to be 20 feet wide. The site and landscaping plan should be revised to provide a minimum 24 foot wide aisle in this area. It is noted that compact parking spaces adjacent to this aisle may make this requirement easier to comply with. Section 18.108.050 (required walkway location) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the primary ground floor entrances to the streets which provide the required access and egress. The site plan does not propose any pedestrian walkways extending from the main entrance of the structure to either SW Naeve Street or SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, the site and landscaping plans should be revised to provide fer a convenient hard-surfaced pedestrian connection between SW Naeve and the church with phase one development, and between SW Pacific Highway and the church with phase three development. Section 18.108,m1 (accese and circulation) states that if more that 100 parking spaces are required, the minimum access width for a single access shall be 30 feat. The proposed church would provide for far in excess of 100 parking spaces. Therefore, the required paved width for the access driveway is 40 feet A 36 foot wide driveway to SW Naeve Street is proposted. This driveway will therefore need to be widened slightly. Section lilialltti.10.13.13A (signs) regulates the size of freestanding signs for non-residential uses in the R-25 zoning district. A 32 square foot, six foot tall monument sign is permitted in this zone for non-residential use. A 60 square foot, seven foot tall monument sign is shown on the landscaping plan. Therefore, the proposed sign is not an acceptable size or height. Revised sign plans must therefore be developed that are consistent with Code maximum size and height standards, as well, as location relative to clear vision areas as previously mentioned. Wall signs also may be permitted for this use on this site. A sign permit will need to be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on this site. Chapter la.isq (tree removal) Unto the criteria for approving tree removal. Chapter 18.150 ;ill be eatiefied because the applicant will be required to estain a tree removal permit prior to removing trees over 6 inches in caliper size in preparation for development. Permits will be granted only if it is found necessary to remove the trees to accommodate structures, roadways, eidewalks, Utilities, or other necessary site improvements. It should be clear from the review of the Site plan and grading plan that this will require the removal of most of the trees on the site due to the significant amount of grading which must occur. Nevertheless, special effort should be taken to retain as many mature treed as possible. The applicant should be allowed to remove Undergrowth and small Lrees that do not require a tree removal permit. The applicant ehould then prepare a detailed tree survey of all trees within the portion of the site to be developed. The tree Survey should then be used by the applicant and City staff to review the site plan and public improvement plans in order to determine whether revisions to these plans can be made to retain additional existing mature trees. The City's Engineering Department should be directed to be flexible in reviewing the design of public improvements such as sidewalk locations in on effort to save existing trees. STAFF REPORT CUP 93-012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 9 • Section 18 .030.A.1.a (streets) states that street© adjacent to a development shall be improved in accordance with the standards of Chapter 18.164. Section 15.164.030, (minimums rights -of -way and street widths) contains the regulations pertaining to street standards. SW Pacific Highway is classified as an arterial. The minimum width standards for an arterial are 30 feet of right: -of -way and 20 feet of pavement from centerline as well as curb and sidewalk. The right -of= -way for SW Pacific Highway adjacent to this oite far exceeds the minimum right -of -way standard; therefore no additional right -of way should be required as a condition of development approval. The site plan recognizes the need to widen the roadways install curbs and sidewalk, and install a storm sewer along the SW Pacific Highway flans conoistent proposes is five-foot wide improvement standards. Thee plan, sidewalk whereas the City's design standards call for an eight -foot wide sidewalk along arterial streets such as Pacific Highway. The plans should be revised accordingly. SW Native Street is classified as a local street. The minimum width g standards for a local street are 25 feet of right-of-way and 17 feet of pavement from centerline as well as curb and sidewalk. The tight-of-way for SW Naeve Street adjacent to this site in 20 feet from centerline; therefore five additional feet of additional right -of way should be required to be dedicated as a condition of development approval, rather than the ten additional feet of dedication the applicant's site plan calls for. The site lan recognizes the need to widen the roadway, install curbs and sidewalk, and install a storm sewer along the SW Naeve Street frontage consistent with the minimum improvement standards. The timing of the construction of the eastern portion of SW Naeve Street g y coordinate with the scrods the site's frontage May be difficult to construction of the 109th-Royalty Parkway connectio n and the SW Naeve Street that o qu d with development of the Triad Bite. The conditions of approval ra ©mrlended by the Engineering Department should assure that SW Naeve Street can be kept open while forging ahead with the planned improvements for this area The applicants should work with the g g p d to En ineerin De artment and Triad coordinate construction of this a some y become necessary for a it m so street. It should be understood that, a a Naeve deviation from the stated conditions of approval related to SW me Street construction to occur depending on how things work out in coordinating the work of all involved parties. Code Section 18.164°030 provides a variety of deta3,lcw standards for the design and improvement of public streets. The pl °e3iminary improvement plans shown on the site and utilities plane appear coneif tent with all applicable standards. public improvement plans will need to be prepared to the Conditions of approval. Detailed plans will re arse hn ret�ponss need to be developed consistent with the standards of this Code section. .. (aanita nd that n) tequiree that o t me be hat nest deveJl pm Y y ar sanitary The r imp vements Section 18164 090 s or extensions be appros d y e��er . . ved by the City Engineer. utility plan eight inch diameter sanitary sewer extension to betve served by ties ar e n approprit�t:ely provides for an eight i rf held d an existing line along the western edge of the Vounta .nep at 5 m e f from evelopment. so Deal be rovidtd for any n provisions for Section 18.164.100 .(storm dra� age) requilee that ads .rat new developarient storm water drainage and di �' , , , y on -site The proposal includes plans for a otormwater collection s stems water quality facilities, storm sewers► along both street frontages, and STAFF REPORT CUP 93- 012/PDR 03 -03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 10 • • • • drainage to an existing storm sewert on SW NabV0 Street. The Engineering Division's review of the preliminary plane for these facilities finds that them should provide necessary site drainage consistent with this Code Section. CeLe_p_n ret_tfer_u3imitepj_.ax: An noted above, Community Development Code Section 18.130.040.A.6 requires that conditional use proposal's be demonetrated to comply with applicable Comprehensive Plan policien. Staff finds that the proposed church development complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies an follows: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because NPO 06 has been informed of the proposal and ha° been given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. In addition, notice of the public hearing and the opportunity to comment on the propoaal ham been sent to nearby prcperty ownere. 2. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state, and regional water quality standard°. In order to comply with this policy, a condition in warranted to require the applicant to :submit an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with eroaion control standards for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application and to develop on-site water quality facilities as required by the USA regulations for the Tualatin River basin. The (lite plan notes that storm water detention facilities will be conetructed, although no detailo are provided. The applicant should be required to develop plans for on-eite storm water quality facilities for review and approval of the Engineering Department. 3. Policies 7.1.2 and 7.4.4 provide that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public Water, newer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and utilities placed underground. Thin conditional Use application development propoaal complies with Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 because the applicant will extend public newer, storm newer, and water systems to this bite and will be required to provide for underground installation of telephone and electricity lines along the site'o frontages. 4. Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will, plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Also, Policy 8.1.3 provide n the City will require an a precondition of approval that: a. Development abut a dedicated street or has other adequate acceas; b. Street right-of.-Way shall be dedicated where the street ia substandard in width; c. The developer shall commit to construction of the istreets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development. da The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing Streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; STAFF REPORT CUP 93-012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE Ii 4.0 e e. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. This application complies with Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 because the proposed improvements to the public streets adjoining this site will be required to be coneistent with City of Tigard and Oregon State Highway Division road improvement standatde. The street and access plane do not appear to raise any significant safety or capacity concerns. III. CONCLUSION Based on the above findings of consistency with the applicable approval standards for a conditional use and planned development, it is concluded that this proposed development application by the Tigard Covenant Church will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding land uses, provided development that occurs complies with applicable local, state and federal laws, Therefore, it is recommended that the City of Tigard Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit CUP 93-0001/Planned Development Review PDR 93-0002 regarding tax lot 300 of 4CTM 251 10DB subject to the conditions which fol.', 114: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE 10T PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT FOR ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE CHRIS DAV/ES, ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The site and landscaping plans shall be reviSed to accommodate the following: a. Sidewalks shall be no lees than eight feet in width along SW Pacific Highway b. The proposed sign at the entrance driveway shall be relocated outside of the required vision clearance area. The sign size proposed on the site plan is not permitted. Frac:attending sign size and height for this use shall be conuieitent with Code Section 18.114.130.1.ds allowances for freestanding sizes for non- reeidential use0; c. All two-way internal access driveways or parking lot aisles shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width; d. The access driveway to SW Naeve Street shall be revised to a nminimum width of 40 feet; ; ■ e. The Elite plan ahall be revised to provide for a minimum of 11 bicycle parking spaces with development of phane one, and 14 total bicycle parking spaces with development r'f phase three auto parking. f. The plans should be revised to provide for a convenient hard- surfaced pedestrian connection between SW Naeve and the church with phase one development, and between SW pacific Highway and the church with phase three development. 9. Supplemental information on the type and planting size of the _ proposed Street treee as well as low level plantings or berms along the site's street frontages shall be provided. Additional fir or STAFF REPORT CUP 93-012/PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 12 • redwood trees shall be planted along the eastern edge of the proposed parking lot. Details shall be provided regarding the required screening of .rash and recycling facilities Revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Approval of these plans shall conetitiuto the detailed planned development plan approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. 2, No construction vehiclee shall access or depart the site via SW Naeve Street to the east) or SW 109th Avenue except with prior approval of the City Engineer. Approval for exceptions will be given only if the applicant can show that there is no practical alternative for access. Parking of construction vehicles on SW Naeve Street shall be limited to the site frontage and shall comply with all existing regulations as to location and duration of parking. No construction materiale shall be stored within the rights of way of SW Nave Street or Pacific Highway at any time Construction vehicles weans the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of the site improvements or buildings proposed under this application and shall include the vehicles of their suppliers and employees. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Sahreindl, Code Enforcement Officer, 639 -4171. 3. A tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Division before removal of any trees in exceed of 6 inches in diameter. Prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit, the applicant shall have a detailed tree survey prepared showing the type, size, and location of all trees with a caliper of 6 inches or greater. The applicant and City staff shall review the site plan and tree survey with regard to whether any minor modification© to the site plan may be made in order to retain additional existing trees. The Planning Division may require the applicant to provide for an arborist's report and recommendations regarding trees that may be reasonably retained and rotective measures for those trees. The Planning Division or the applicant's arboriat may prescribe protective measures for the trees to be retained. These measures must be remain in place throughout construction activities on the site. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. 4. Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the the outside and along accessways. Building construction must be upgraded sprinkler protection must be structure me +aaured around o fora the water automatic s be provided. All pl h approved by the Tigard Water Distric system and fire hydrants shall coordinated throw i�, and app �' g and Tualatin Valley and Rescue District. The applicant shall be g responsible for the Fire and Water Districts providing the City with assurance that this condition of approval has been satisfied. n radii for fire outside diameter. shall not be less than 25 foot Turning �� Plano should be submitted inside diameter and _ "ter. ec3s fire lanes to the Tualatin Valle Fireand Rescue District showing intended through the parking area The applicant shall be respondible for the Fire District providing the city with assurance that this condition of approval has been Setiof ied. 6 All reuemmended COnditions approval re or provided shall be the �aaade attached conditions of Tigard Engineering Department's _ ._... ... �..., report development approval. STAFF CONTACT. Chris Davies. STAFF REPORT CUP 93- 012 /PDR 93-03 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 13 • UNLESS A SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IS POSTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SAT/SPIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMITS 7. Sign permits shall be obtained from the Planning Division prior to the installation of any signs on the site which Are intended to be seen from the public right-of-way or other parcels. STAFF CONTACT s The Planning Division. 8 The proposed landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements shall be installed in substantial conformance with the approved site and landscaping plans. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID XL' BUILDING PERMIT PLANS ARE ISSUED AND SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION ON PHASE ONE IS COMMENCED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DEC/SION. PHASE TWO MID THREE CONSTRUCTION ARE APPROVED SO LONG AS THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION TIME FOR COMPLY:SION OF ALL PHASES 18 NO GREATER THAN SEVEN YEARS., Prepared by: Approved by: Dick Bewersdorff Senior Planner Date STAFF REPORT CUP 03-012/PDR 93-03 T/GARD COVENANT CHURCH PAGE 14 • 4 , ;01 ; • „ .",1 '14 • • 4. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGhRD, OREGON • TO: Jerry Offer FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP 93-0001 DescriatiEta: April 22, 1993 0.4 The applicant proposes to develop an approximately 5.7 acre site with an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities which will be developed through several phases. The initial phase will develop approximately 10,000 square feet. Finding 1. STREETS: The site is located at the northeast corner of Pacific Highway and S.W. Naeve Street. Pacific Highway is a state highway and is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon State Department of Transportation. S.W. Naeve Street is a local street. The State Highway Division has submitted the following recommended conditions of approval: A. No direct access to Pacific Highway B. Curb, sidewalk and drainage required along highway frontage C. Widen pavement between existing edge and new curb edge D. Obtain a permit from ODOT prior to any work within the states right-of-way. The Engineering Department concurs with the above recommendations with the exception of the sidewalk. The states normal requirement is a 5 foot sidewalk, including curb, to be placed along state highways. The City's minimum requirement is to require 8 foot sidewalks, not including curb, to be installed along all arterial's. Therefore, we recommend the minimum sidewalk width be 8 feet, not including the curb. Currently, S.W. Naeve Street is unimproved along the frontage of the site. The street is surfaced with compacted gravel, has open drainage ditches on both sides, and no curb or sidewalk. Typically, under these conditions the applicant is required to provide and install two-third street improvements along the ENGINEERING COMMENTS: CUP 93-01 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH 1 fi , „ „ 4.44, " t. • !.• :$1 44 4 , 4. 4 • • frontage of the site to bring the road in compliance with local street standards. However, there are special concerns due to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map, Note 10. Note 10 of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map the sSforlan extension and realignment of �- 09thAvenue Highway at Royalty Parkway. Street extension, to intersect Pacific g realigned 109th Avenue shall intersect Naeve Street wt a point The g approximately 250 feet to 450 feed. east h � of Pacific w 11, lrequ3gre that the the implementation of the realignment Naeve to the intersection of 109th /Naeve be reconstructed; c shifting ntThe applicant north at the southeast corner of the p has shown on the preliminary plans this realignment. Therefore, the following improvements should be required on S.W. Naeve Street: A. From Pacific Highway to the east reai ment and provide two- third property line provide the needed right -of -way to match the g street improvements using the revised Naeve Street alignment as shown on the site plan. B. Provide a connection between the east should provide a hard line and existing Naeve Street. The connectia surface pavement for two way traffic: 2. SANITARY SEWER: sewer adjacent to the site. is a_ roxim the there is no public sanitary Currently st public l approximately 300 feet south °tto The nearest p The applicant is proposing southeast corner of the pxoperty extend this line to serve this development. The existing line has the capacity to handle this development. 3. STORK! SEWER: Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed mu to enforce (Reso lution and Order No, The Unified Se 9i -d7) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu ieu of their construction. The applicant is proposing to c on -site water quality ro osin construct on +the preliminary plans, the storm water from facilities. Based o p +,..,• i stem, It wi�.�. then be into a private sy . the site will be piped _ facility prior to being discharged, 0 transported to a water quality fa into the public storm sewer system located in S.W. Naeve Street. J •f. 2 re ; r. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE_EgULDIESIMMIll SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along 46 the S.W. Naeve Street frontage. From Pacific Highway to the east property line provide the needed right-of-way to match the realignment using the revised Naeve Street alignment as shown on the site plan. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Two-thirds street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox cluster(s), concrete sidewalk(s), driveway apron(s), curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer(s), storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the frontage S.W. Naeve Street. The improvements shall match the realignment using the revised Naeve Street alignment as shown on the site plan. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street standards. 3. The applicant shall provide a connection between the east property line and existing Naeve Street. The connection should provide a hard surface pavement for two way traffic. 4. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval OWES: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. 5 Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer- engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 6. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 3 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. flt " 4 :* 8 Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 9. The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of the NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 10. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of Pacific Highway. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 11. Access directly onto Pacific Highway shall not be permitted. 12. The applicant shall provide the following improvements along 's Pacific Highway frontage:curb, sidewalk and drainage. The Iprovements shall meet the requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation except for the sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide not including the curb width. 13. The applicant shall widen the pavement between the existing edge or as determined by the State Highway Division to the new curb edge. The pavement section shall meet the requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bondS. 4 `I The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project confeJrms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED: Randall R. Wool City Engineer nt\engineet\cup93-01,cd ,o{* . I • •■ . ■ *,1, , ,,,o 1 1, :•-4-0.-,..: ' .. ,',1" '.t •., • '4 . s*, ,- ' ',, '::: ,:•,;;;,-,... 1",it .. .'''''''..,!1—., • ;,, .'..I '.,.` • i • ,:' ,•4", ,,,1 e ..1,4 .., t I. 'e 1.* S. THE FOUNTAINS AT SUMMA FIE c CONDOMINIUMS CALLED TO SEE YOU • . .0 • fl• ■••': 11, 00 RECEIVED PLANNING 4 APR 2 0 1993 15100 SW Crown Drive #6 King City, Oregon 97 24 April 16, 1993 Mr. Jerry Offer Staff Planner, Tigard Pinning Commission Ti gagst City Hall 131 2 SW Hall Boulevard . Tigard Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Offer: I wish to go on reoord as opposing the re request of the Tigard Covenant Church to construct a church bhilding or any building on the 5.7 acre plot at the northeast corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Maeve Street. This construction would destroy too much natural'habitat, and far too much his already been destroyed.This natural habitat is part of the crowning glory of Tigard and should be preserved in its natural state at all costs, hope the Covenant' Church is able to purchase a more suitable building 'bite as I am not opposed to this congregation building somewhere in Tigard, It is just that I at opposed to ally, construction at the site in question which would be an ecologi- cal disaster Very truly yoursi Avu Doug as J. Coleman NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO # 6 FILE NO: CUP 93-0001/PDR 93-0003 FILE TITLE: Tigard Covenant Church APPLICANT: Frank Wood PO Box 151 Clackamas, OR 97015 OWNER: Tigard Covenant Church 11545 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: A request for Planned Development conceetpal plan review for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Development detailr_Acilan review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Development Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80,120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18,130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 251 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concern the NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this propoSal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the City. Thank you. STAFF CONTACT: latt.YJ1MIL:gII-ALLL__ Access To and From Site omarelersour Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact Environmental Impact prroorrotram COMMENTS: .11.111■1110•■•■• Signed: 121_121:: ECEIVED PLANNING mainguon COMMENTS APR 8 1993 DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ,PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NO #6) A request for Planned Demloant_ammtual Easaseview for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Develo meat detailed Itkala review approval is requested for the rWrrial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Develo mer___.z.....1UtszLe2: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Condiina1 Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.71207180tand 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW'Neeve Street (WCTM 281 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review, From • information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Japs.4_1, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attache separate letter to return your comments. Ify_cALAT__‘euraable to res onday the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: LejEmINUINL_____ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. 4•1••••••••■•••••••1 Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: of our office. vors••••••••••••••■••■■•■•■•u• Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: EMIZETFOR cOMMENTS • • 6 TO: ms FROM: Tigard .Planning Depa ment 6.43 • RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93 0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93%4003 TIGARD COVENANTHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Planned De29120101_2012Epall AL.a.La_oview for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. 001111024.112.2 review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Devele4meatdetgled Risa review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development, APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: plammilly22/2122me1ljlEzieu: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 251 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Apr,"2, 1993, You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. g_you are unable to respond by the above date please phone the staff contact noted beloW With your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 91223. PHONE: 639-4171, STAFF CONTACT: gerry_Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our offiCe. DATE: March 25 1993 Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. 4" • TRI- COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON dito RECEIVED PLANNING APR 8 1993 TRI DIET 4012 S,E,17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 Apiil 6, 1993 Jerry Offer Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jerry, Tri -Met appreciates the opportunity to respond to the conceptual plans for the Tigard Covenant Church at SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street. Based upon the plans submitted, we would suggest the following two revisions: 1) The project should add a direct pedestrian link . main ` g and Pacific between them . n but din an to travel Highway, The proposed plans require pedestrians arriving from the northeast t a significant distance out of direction to reach the building entrance. 2) Place the landscaping strip and street trees between the proposed sidewalk and the street curb along Pacific Highway rather than a curb tight sidewalk as shown on the plans. This provides a buffer between the pedestrians and the high volumes of traffic and enhances access to the transit service along Pacific Highway. Please call me at 239.5859 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, King i erly Kno Project Coordinator Tri-Met Transit Development TO: • QUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE H P 93- 0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH ( NPO #6) A request for Planned Develo►mQ oncentual ari revis�w for development of an approximately � Con ditonal Use 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R -25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Develo ment detailed Wm, review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Develo ment Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.58, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner 30 of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 251 10DB, tax lot0) ZONE: R- 25(PD) (Residential, 25 Units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wi3h to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aare, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments, If ou are unable to ref and b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your, comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerrt Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 4/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: ' e 10"' of our office. - ' --- • • :;. LEGIBILFI'YSTRIP mosT FOR COMMENTS 41r(A DATE: March 25i 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WO #6) A request for Slmarine(;1122nkoLteritcolpIcetual_ 2.1..artreview for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Development detailed pl.an review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Da_veloiltReview: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCT' 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information sUpplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and at decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near fUture. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by ikar,5, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your coMments. _y_fouareuratblatolssLszoadtheabove date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerrv. Offer, PLEASE CHECX THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written CoMments: 0 r o 14- 1- "2.4 c2.1413RE, Ls- s cr. Name Of Person Com:denting Phone NUMber: _4w. of our office. te..-i-p4 f 00J -0.414 iv rwre- tigiLL4Le.- 4 e04445 h.) t- 3/2.-1/FL3 $ I 40-1:. Os tr.) (A 111-1— d7r---- 10D e PC4vS r o 04,,.6i dem q" to o, Ao towo y 1 id )0.0 t. et of igoi■dy , *„ EggyEsT FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Elsaug_alcOsTinentcormetual__________a___ Warr review for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, planagd_almakagmentdetaile_ft EQ&I. review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned INAIOsayLEIEzigyz: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Use Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.98, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your reView. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Apr. 5, 1993. YoU may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. tf od are unable to res ond b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 91223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: der Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: 184047.3Ail Phone NUMber: Cink.w1/4-t-PABA • .^ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93 -0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93 -0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Planned Deve m lopenti conceptual Elan rev a fa development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of h church at this site Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R -25 zoning district. In addition, Planned_ Development detailed plan review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Develo ment Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18 .20.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10• and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTrt 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R- 25(PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the ro osal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need comments by Apr. 5, 1993. Lou Y may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Tl VOU_are_ unable to res and b the above datey. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Offer. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: The Water District will require that a fire hydrant be placed within 250 feet of all portions of the building. Also, if the building is to be fire s rinkled then. a Double Check Detector Assembl DCDA)0 nt be installed. bac�cflow prevention device will need . Michael. Miller, Senior Management Analyst Name of Person Commenting. Phone Number : .� :15 5 4 • RECEIVED PLANNING APR 5 1993 BE010212B..21MEEEDI DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH moo #6) A request for Planned Developmtant_solscptual plan review for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use ,review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Develo ment detailed 1.p...,11,1t review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Development Review.: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 13.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chnpters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW WaeVe Street (WCTM 251 10DB. tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aps"..5.$ 1993. You may Use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. ILysigsre unable to respond...by the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments it writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 61.10•111MMONE Written Comments: RECEIVED PLANNING !QUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Planned jautimpent concgetual ELap_restt for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. gsnAitiolglat review aikroval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Developmnp detailed p141 review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Del/212 irpLeaLltai,....ew: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10: and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposed in the near future. If you wish t� comment on this application, we need your comments by A r_p_.:1_51, 1993. Yott may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments, ..I.Lycsare unable to b tiles_tbraygriatt. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon an possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: aerry Offer APR 7 1993 DATE: March 25 1993 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: st 0o. 4.4.1.44104•041•■••• Name of Person Commenting: gS 04/07/93 0947 1,25q 239 6469 TRIKET PUB INFO 444 CITY OF TIGAF.D Z001/002 ,, MBUSST FOR COMMINTS tJa DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: CONDITIONAL U E CUP 93-0001 "AWED DEVE OPHENT PAR 93-0003 TIGARD c_clw.N.E.S_HURCH (NPO #6) A request or atm o conce tual w eardevelopment of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and re ated facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditipnal review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. ReligioUS aSSeMblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Dome o mant detailed Ware teview approval is retested fot the initial approxemately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: iamted Develem_It Review: Community Development code Section 18.80.120: glaguitumuma Reykr: Community Development Code Sections :'.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.1300/50 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 281 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Let.ached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your tevieW. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other inforMation available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepared and a decision Will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you Wish to comment on this applidation, we need your comments by 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate /Otter to return your comments. If oU are unable to tee ond the above date please phone the staff contact noted ;)elow ich your comments and conf rm your comments in writing As soon as possible. If you have any questions regatding this Matter, centact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAPP CONTACT: ery Offer •PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the rioposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclozed letter. Written Comments: of our officm garde of Person Commenting: WAA Phone Number: Oaf 04/07/93 08:49 '503 239 6469 TRIMET PUB INFO 4-44 CITY OF TIGARD 0002/002 TPI<< OUNiY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON d012 S,E.17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 4'7202 April 6, 1993 Jerry Offer Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: PPR 93 -0003, Tigard Covenant Church Dear Jerry, Tri -Met appreciates the opportunity to respond to the coneeptual plans for the Tigard Covenant Church at SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street. Based upon the plans submitted, we would suggest the following two revisions: 1) The project should add a direct pedestrian link between the main building and Pacific Highway. The proposed plans require pedestrians arriving from the northeast to travel a significant distance out of direction to reach the building entrance. 2� Place the landscaping strip and street trees between the proposed sidewalk and the street curb along Pacific Highway rather than a curb tight sidewalk as shown on the plans: This provides a buffer between the pedestrians and the high volumes of traffic and enhances access to the transit service along Pacific Highway. Please call me at 239 -5859 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely; Kim city Kilo project Coordinator Tri -Met Transit Development APR- 07 -'93 WED 09:43 ID :CITY OF KING CITY FAX NO :503 639 -3771 0667 P02 MOST FOR COMMENTS DATE: March 25 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Dcpartr+tent RE: CO Nit„I ONAL USE,.;.CUP 93-0001 P ED DEVELOPMENT P D'R 93 -09 . TIGARD COVENANT C `C. '( #6) A request for Planned Development conceptual to or development of an approximate y 34, 000 square foot church an related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use reviow approval as concurrently requested to allow development of the c urCh at th2.e site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses ` is requested for the initial. approximately � detailed in tie R -25 zoning district. In addition, Plannead Deve3.ot��te 1 Elm review approval g square foot phase of the development. APPLICAP.LE REVIEW CRITERIA: ple�nned li ®velmilent Review; Community Developments Code Section 18.80.120: tiotia .1 Ra�vfewscormnunity Development Code Sections 18.130.040 1a .1 : , WU! id7131.150 (c) 10; and asaociated Coda Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: Rtk25(PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre with the Planned Devel,Qpment Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be preparel and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to co: merit on this application, we need your contents by �, 3„ 5, 1993. You May use the spacO provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. ou pre unaa nd bl!_ tea res a b t+he 1iove data please phone the staff contact nested bolos w t±h your comment an confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 91223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Cif fe ' _ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY r We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please co;ltact „,� of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Cormnenting Phone timber PROPOSAL DESCRIPT/ON 45 PILE Isio:CUP 93-cool rae. '13 -000.4 FILE TITLE: -aka() CovEism 4,4/2,6 APPLICANT: F;40,0t k Wool) Pt. ao 16-/ Ci.40 ( 4-1,4 O, 70,0s--. OWNER: 7T611. Po Co itxW-r 6444t.c // 43• 6i.A.) bugatidept Tiebeioio &,- AGENT: 744 platvlikte4d. 0'4 friorweel ./t) 4. 94Ate taliti4tA, REQUEST: et, t,EACL4t o te P/44L4,( attid 14114A./ 464?-144ir"'" 401- di ofr444441. "A ,,%e,ititei. tiAA et. dx.1 -A.Leitat:ed cry., al, oNiteed i;otader 414A4 dat-- 646djaCzkilL lakmes,14.- aftm ewri 4,1 eerittuld44...firs,04,6e4 •/o caljage 0 httPc't At di:4'44k fit,w 41,tt tediA (e714.1 ataie 00(4.60:4 VOA- -14XeCt a eerkat CrhAk t4a4 -5 »1€) d414.1"14AL' 41% P"4. D`tOtt6=4"12,f,-.A.141.41 „„144<te °Aft& 1;0 -ifftatitect. kn. 4c.. tm-aiak attp,$,tocimtatati to, 000 frioAA. /44- atify, aq, cob sp 4, APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: piet„kiek Clout,51444,4+,61 brAtt6.14,41,4,4,d dyd.O. 42..t.lt°1- 18'6°410J eamtdd;),4, C(4,,c k "15,, a le, 13o, otioj 1610Z, Iso a,Kate.tao, IS0loj e, ecyck. CA.tip 113,qt..) IELioe?, ist(n) t06) 0006) 18 fig le 13?) 43,4( IE. 14V L0CAll°14: /1&011.0 ole 41:W/fiv,4.4(se., ///44,14ittcy dA,t45( SIA/ rittgiot .574.4e,;6. Cw4rm as' 1008 egv( Zcs/' (44-'dYiffej2-?5"-apiA5 4411t.- to:ak M. ef;1414t€61 vatOt 4.4. et d NPO NO: 4' NPO CHAIRPERSON: te o.1 PHONE NUMBER: ?.,y - 0 17 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUN; BACK o_pgApiu ON 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITY dbUtlett DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 0,V2ed REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS: ze VICINITY ipip V LANDSCAPXNG PLAN NARRATINIE _l' ARCHITECTURAL toLAN TS AJPo at.t>6 bill r-R.T.: SITE PLAN OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Lietzi& CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hallo PO Box 23397 Tigardo,Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL ,ENFOPMATION OtOPERTY AWRESS/LOCATION (2. • FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO.ggil:52.5.14.22—. OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT MO. ?3 APPLICETION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Application elements submitted: Application for (1) Owner's signatureiwVVVen- ----- HONE ZIP 14 o 6 CITY ZIP L"---61) Piling fee a345R fitiek PHONE LO. 024 *When. the owner and the applicant are different .1.°Aotolat.-4Z 'Cps+ people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record DO INED TO BE COMPLETE: tiogetelm (0 Title ttausfet instent (1) dit__CD) Assessor's map (1) Site plan (pre-appichecklist) 7L3F) Applicant's statement It, (pre-app. checklist) " ' or a leaseelt possession with wtitten authorization from the ownet or an agent of the owner with wtitten authorisation, The ownet(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. 2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the aOhject property . IMOBeripArAtesAIMNACII request conditional use approval to alloW ,--------------.NA-At\---=--------;------------- \v MA 11/4.111rAmt gere04 Nutbott JQ liettihgo Offidet ApotoltAl Date Inuit Approval bate: 01 "OOSS 9111111SHOO WOOSHO 140:1 E3:01 17.66T-S-InJ • 3q List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be considered as part of thia3 *pplicationt 4. Applicantsp: /* have aiw complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. S. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above re uest does not violate aye deed restrictions that ma bt . s,ttanched o is ose".4 u T t c o act property. • rr i IWY �hiY 1 B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of ' the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits trans itted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that a any ,ouch statements are fai se . pp tire contents of the application, Including A. The applicant has read rho en the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 19 , day of � �..rcD /__ SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. 19 Jyi (KSL: dam /036P0. Eli' d SSW - 01 .poss bt 111.` ti t 10D o ND I'ln *ld 0.10T E661- t3Z -51 :1 4 A .4 NAM ADDRE% CIT- or. 1X(II) - RrCEIPT .01,. PAYMENT R4CL1PT NO* CHtCK AMOUNT t 451050 I.M.F4 nevrummemt CASH AMOUNT t • 0.,A0 P.O.SOX 154 PAYMEN1 DATE;„ t,SUBDIVISION 3 PUPPOnE tn PAYMLNT AMOUNT PA ID PURPOSC Or- PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID LANO APPL 5D119:,0 -OS 4154,00 LAND WiE APPL LUP4tM-04 A%.t50 GONDITIONAL Pfi:NMITISTM DrUO.UPMKNI REVSM " Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Conditional Use for Tigard Covenant Church 4,4 Dear Planner; I am including this narrative with the Application form enclosed, It is our desire to have an approval for a church on the subject gopoperty. The plen oreeented is a three phase plan which will be built over the next 5-10 years. The total complex will house the ministry of Tigard Covenant Church, Tigard Covenant Church is a new church in the City. Present- ly the church meets in rented facilities, The property at the corner of Naeve and Highway 99 was purchased for the sole purpose of constructing a new home for the church family, Our present goals for the property and the schedule for at- taining these goals are as follows: 1. Phase I Building: A. Multi-purpose room for various church activities. Will seat approximately 356 for church functions. B. Education classrooms (Sunday school) and office space for the staff of the church. C. Total square footage of construction in p, one is 9,890 s.f. D. Phase one parking will moot City requirements (79). 2. Phase i Building is anticipated to be built this Summer and finished by January 1, 1994. 3. Phase II Building will be an addition to the existing building in the following areas: A. Enlarge the Hulti-purpose room by 2,000 s.f. B. Add additional Classrooms, 4,000 s.f, C. Possible construction in 1995. . 7 a • of Phase III Building will include: A. Sanctuary to seat approximat6ly 800 to 900. B. Education classrooms (Sunday SI)hool). C. Total square footage of phase III would be apprc mately 18,000. D Increase parking area to maximum capacity (202). E. This phase would probably be built around 1998. Sincerely, Frank R. Wood Church Representative a'"• • ' J or. . • S , PROPERTY LOSAT!ON ADDRESS: %or. TAX hAP L TAX tpT 4 coke_ • S77; PROPOSAL DESCRiPT/ON: CoAdsriattc* COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MOIoNATION; BE14(4A4 ZONING DESIGNATION* • NEIGHBORHOOD ORGhNIZhTION CHAIRPERSON*, 5 PHONE: DX STRItT DIMENSIONAL RHQUIREMMNTS nimum lot rates 0006: ft. Minimum lot widths At"ft: setbacks* front.. _la ft.; nide- ftio. rearall tt. . gara00-42 ft. Cornet-2Q 2t4 from both ntreeta. Maximum site coverages .152% Minimum landnoaped or natugal vegetation areal* AO maximum building height...* At ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot reontagei 2 feet unlesi lot tweeted through the Mirtar UM% pattition process: tots, created as part of a partition muat have a minioum of is feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easeMent: MaximUm lot depth to Width wittio of 2.$ to 1. • SPECIAL SETBACKS stteeto$ ...,_ta_. ft. from centerline of 1Ie*j5.1c„, zehab.u.au4.azmme4.--ft-rvrtnir the niters . boundaiy ZONXI40 Page 1 113'd SSW - 411 01 X8s OHIlinSHop 3aUD5:13 E66T- did D na :Le person parking: Ali. pin king, area's providing in amens 'of 'five requirod automobile parking spaces► ohall provide appropriately located and ' designated disabled per ®ern parking epacee. The Minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be pr vided and parking space cite 'are mandated 'by the Oregon Revised statutes and Americana cana with Disabilities Act (Bee ' bnncxt ) P parking symbol shall be painted on the ,,:.parking s a� surface and an appropriate sign shall be' provided.. „ . �' � , ; ��� a3e racks 're re fired, fer' civic wai4s, nori-reeadential uses, commercial uses, and induatr&a1 use®, providing 15 or more 'automobile parking space:. Bicycle parking must be provided at a refit io of one iodated in areas protected frot automobile Planning siiaXl, on traffic. The S�lanrirt bicycle rack space per 15 auto sparking apacae. cycle racks Dig: ®ion can provide, specifications for approved bicycle rack 'bipeds. ' ' . All drivewaare and poking areas, except lot settle fleet aturge parking areas, rube be paved. Dritiye -in use queuing area® s Minimum number of noceseote a �... �.. .., Minimum acCena width. 24 ft. Maximum accede widths Pedestrian accede must be provided between building entrances and parking are as, outdoor co on areas, and publid ®idewalke and streets. Parking area 1andecaping and sCre ninga For detailed.. information on design ..re Tre nto for ,asking areas + na accesses,. see unity aev®1a ant dodo Chapters 1;406 and 10.loo. Page 2 SSW - AW I o1 ':rocs o[i 111n9Hoo 91 :DSUJ 1,10A 5 : OT 2661 -98rE A LIINDSChPINO treet trees are 'requited for all developments fronting;6n alpublic or , priv4te atteet'or a driveway more than 100 feet,in letIg*:Street trees mutt" be placed either within the public rightl-ofk,way or 'on . private property within six feet of the right-of-way bOundary...'Sitreet treat; met . have a mtnimum oalior of two inches at four feet above4tale. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet aPart depending on mature tree size; Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees May be obtained from the Planning Division. minimuft of one tree per seven parking spaces 'taunt be planted in and 44 around parking areas in order to provide a Canopy effect. Landecaied screening of puking areas from views from public rights-iof-way .must be provided. BUMMING AND S0RECN/N0 In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noble or visual impacts between ad3soent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires land:waved buffer &read along certain Site perimeters. Nurired buffer area are described by the Code in terms Of width. Naar areas Most be OCCupied by a Mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. site obscuring screens or fencee are also teivired in some cased, and often are advisable even if not reignited: near:tier-1A butter areas May Only be Occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. infOrectiOn on required buffer' area materials and sites may be fottrid in coda ctaptat 18.100 and the Planning 611+01.614h bUlletiti on landeCapilig and bcffOtin14 1404Letid butter *Adthio applioable to your proposal area* ft: along eerth bouadaty ft. along beet boundary • tt, alOng aeut4 boundaty ft. along eat boundary • .f. 1:n addition, sight obscuring screening is required etitaosvor p. eaLtotle Page 3 Staid sSW 01 e0oss t41111nsHoO 8a1.33890 WO86J istoT geSV-9z-asA 13ENIMETIvX tams other Agency Pert pun= FAcirAT:130 The purpose of the prd-apPlication ,conference is tot (L) identify Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (Li) to provide city staff an opportunity to comment On'specific cOncerne; and (iii) to review the application .review process with'the applicant including identifying who will be the final decidion maker for the application. The extent of public iMprovement0 and dedicationd to be requited of' the applicant will be recommended by city Engineering Department staff and apiereved by the appropriate authority There will be no final recommendation to the dedieibtt maker by City staff until all comMenting agendied, City abaft and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of '9-abaci imptovement related tequirdevonte that may be required as a condition of development approval for your pro3ect. Unless noted otherwise, the primary Contact for 4mestions related to public facility issues is 4 r r "4, gighttok..wa-_ddidatitit,thdatioatigoltlItecluitedthat land area he "d1641641t6th"itiblidthiribt44"6"ttitigOiiaid 1. etAtO ice the, .4"0htd,..bfwe ultimate functional street takitteifietitiork rights-of-way widEh tipticifitid* the dommulaity Developt6ent dodo' Approval of a deVelopMeot appliChiest for thLe diced will eepite .dediCation of right,iofiimay fele lattpiF it to . feet fret* denterlitioi • 2 . 10 : ,4,,,.....,14E,,,, 'to feet froM Cianterlinee • Page 4 - . SSW - Ata 01 'oosS WilinsHoo mUosUp WO nom 266T-9-g3 I'hI • , Heided Strest'improvement* will include feet of pavement. from centerline, curb and'gutters,.st!iet0 sewer's, a five400t wide sidewalk; necessary 'street 'signs, streetlights, and a:tWo Irioar streetlighting fee, . . . . . In itoMe Cases whore street iMproveMents or other necessary public: improvement* are not.currently pr deferred, In thee* 4ases, As a property owner(0). muit execute A the property owner's tight to tern* improvement district formed to impro cal, the street improvements may be tion of deveLdpment approval, the ranee Agreement which waives e against the formation of a local eond nen- Pedeatr tmegoltbikewatst , L the _glom* sappary sewer tts this property is an inch line located The proposed developtent must be conneoted te A sanitary sewer. Xt is the de* Loper.* teeponsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's ti0:191,,Agsbly71 the .:Igard Water Piero:Piet (Phone: 639-1554) ,le-0WItatrAiiinklimiAiti prevides.publie water servide in the area of thits eite, the apprepriate Water District should be etn*Atrtect fa* inforMAtiOn regarding *inter supply for your prepocied developMent, rite proteCtiOn* Tualatin Valley Oire and ttesette District (Contact: Cane Dirchill, 645-8533) provide* fire protection services within the city et tiOerd. The astritt shOuid be e�nt4Cted for information regarding the adelOaCy Of circolistion systeme, the need for tiro hydrant*, or ether guestiona related to fire protection. Other honey versa.44t Page 5 SSW - AW1 01 'DOSS Oisit iinswoo (1E1.1.'S.UD WO8A 8:0T £66T-9E-gAA k • • 0'7 • • v • SintaltOk 4 ew t41146t 1441; cat IAN Clooksi SMUT OPERXRG PERM= No work, within a public tight-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtianed a street opening permit trot the Engineering Department• FILUBBED FLOOR 'ELEvAVIONS On ail projects that requite a grading plan the applicant shall eUbmit with the grading plan a typical near plan for each 1�t which shall huge tiza elevations of four cornets of that plan alf4ng with elevations at the cornet of each lot. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COWONTS J. 4 • w Pag9 6 ssiii - dWI 01 '31359 91,1111nsHoD 8aUpsk:b 1408A tsten E86T-9z-inA 1.1 4 The administnative decioion/publie hearing typically will occur approximatelyIEW?days after an application is eccepted.as complete by . the Planning Divioion. Applications involving diffiCult' issues or requiring review by .other jurisdictions may take additional tie* to review, written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings. A 10 day appeal period follows all dsci-Oione. An appeal on this matter. would be heard by the , A baeic flow diagraM illustrating the revieW prOcese is.available from the Planning Division. the pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Ccomutrtity Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular mite and to sow the staff and Prospective applicalittO discuss'the opportunities and constraints affel,ting development of the site. 'The conference and totes cannot Cover all Code requirements and aspect* of good site planning that should apply to the development of your cite plan. Failure of the staff to provide any informatOn required by the code obeli not c�nstitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requiremenb s. tt . La recoMmendad that a proepeCtive , applicant either obtain and read thith Community DevalopMent Code Or ask any questione 6f City staff relative to Code requirements prior tip submitting an applieation. Another pre..application Conterinoe is required if an application Le to be Submitted more than six months aft ior this pre-application conference, urtlees is deemed Unnecessar)1, by the Planning DiVision. OgSPARED Bire OFA MANN= 011.15/ON MOM 630-41,1, JoepresPhone Page 7 Ord SSW - AWI 01 'Doss volinsHoD 8GOOSUJ tDhJ OgtOT MST-9E-88A Trd 854 ,411 01 *DOSS oNtlinsmoo 8aw:Aw WMA gsar g66t,.9e-g3,4 .°,LOading'and services areai . . 41) Pedestrian and bicycle:circulation 'y t outdoor common areas ' ' t) Above' ground utilities, 5) The locat di ion, mensions & setback distanees of ail* a) :Existing permanent sttuCtures, iMprovements :.1 utilities and,easemenis which are located on. ' the site and on adjacent property within 26 ' feet of the site b) Proporied structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditiOns 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 0) . The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation ( 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursemerst gemnt5 1r, 9041111.11ft0 (No, of coPies E ) The site development plan shall include a gemding plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to Which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization Oroposals, and time, of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by. data factual substantiating: a) . Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitarl sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problem' will be mitigated and how they wilt be Mitigated , htShi'IPt2gttltil....altiftl (No. of doPiee )% The site developtent plan proposal shall inode 1.) IF loo plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on,sitc. and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. LEDI/SOLtlt (00 o$ copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan oe a target scale if necettearV and shall ihdicatet 1) bescriOtion of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fences, buffets and screenings APPLICATION COECKL/ST -= Page 2 SSW - Alt 4, '0 01,111-1n5HOD 90dos90 WIAA 9sIOT $86I-9E-gg4d el) ..pe-1 mi r ..rt ion r ot 1 e ad Ustm4 t leg siowii. • (No. of copies ): :. . • 1) The owner of ,the subject pArcia E 3 2) The owner's authorlied agent E 3 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 fo(tal), inch north . arrow and date . ( 3 • 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries E 3 5) Location, .width and namie of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ 3 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 2b feet of all property lines ( 3 7) Location and width of all water courses E 3 0 Location +Wally tries'with 6 or greater caliper. at 4 feet above ground level (3 0) All slopes greater thah 26% . ( 3 10) location of existing utilities and utility easemenes (3 11) For Major land partition which creates a public ttreet: a) The proposed right-of-wee location and width (3 I) A scaled crost.esecticn of the proposed street plus any reserve strip. E 3 12) Any appliceble deed restrictions E 3 13) Evidence that land partition till not preclude efficient future land division where appiitable E 3 ggigitilio Pre Wier Plat Ma. ,nd data ebving(No, of Copies ): ' 1) kale equaling 30,60,100 or 200 feet to the inch ad limited to one phase per sheet ( 3 2) The proposed name of the subdivision t 3 a) vicinity map thowing property lationship to arterial and collector streets 4) Names, addressee and telephone numbers of the owner 'developer, engineerh turveyer, designee, at applicableE ] 6) Date of application ( I 6) Doundary lines of tract to ,be subdivided ( 3 7) Name t of adjacent sUbdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcelt Of unsubdivided land Contour linos related to a City-established bench- mark at 1-foot intervale for 0-10% grades grotor than 10% 3 ET'd SSW - 411 01 '00..SS U.11.1,109140D .1‘313051:3 WOIA d�T t8GT-9841.1z1 S.W. 423`rdi AVE. THE FOUNTAINS AT SUMMERFIELD CONDOMINIUMS PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on 1993 at 700 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Planning Commission. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639 - -4171. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93- 0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 _ TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NPO ;fib) A request for Planned Development conceptual._.plan review for development of MI approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R -25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Development detailed plan review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: ,Planned Development Review: Community Development Code Section 1,8.80.120: Conditional Use Reva�ew Community Development Code Sections 18.130,040, 18.120.180, and 18.130,150 (C) 101 and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18,96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164, LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R- 25(PD) (Residential, 25 units /acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) TT PUBLISH _ • CITY OF TIGARD Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION Concerning Case Number(s): CUP 93-0001 PDR 93-0003 Name of Owner: ...Tiaandg2yenant Church Name of Applicant: .Frank Wood Address PO Box 151 City Clackamas State OR Zip 97015 Address of Property: Northeast corner of SW Pacillsalialay....9.11i.gy. Naeve Street Tax Map and Lot No(s).: .2s1 10DB tax lot 300 A request for planr_tesc_Lasyeallan_review for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned DevekoRmgn detailed plaa review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA! Planned Develo ment Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code rs 18.56. 18.96, 18.100, 18,108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to 6. Action: The applicant and owner(s) Owners of record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected governmental agencies Final Decision THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditionS can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Fall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. .12.22a1.1.1. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18,32.290(0) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript costs, (varies up to a maximum of $500,00). The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3130 p.m. Sale2.0.1401JSI. If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, depose and say: (Please print) That I am a Or ,t TY1e City of Tigard, Oregon. Ci '... That I served NOTICE OF That I served NOTICE OF being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as beret bulletin board on the day of in the United States Hail on the postage prepaid PUBLIC BF .RING FOR: DECISION FOR: Tity of Tigard Planning Director igard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council Decision) of which is attached (Marked per on® at the add sss shown on the day of t 19..j.............# d was os ed on an appropriate attached, p 19 ) and deposited Prepared Notice TIMEibed and • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .-)<14.1,014 A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, Agy.,..993 , AT 7:30 PH, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CUP 93-0001/PDR 93-0003 FILE TITLE: Tigard Covenant Church APPLICANT: Frank Wood OWNER: Tigard Covenant Church PO Box 151 11545 SW Durham Road Clackamas, OR 97015 Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Planned_Agyelopmeat conc_aptual jp)ALLmi___.ew for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site. Conditional Use review approval is concurrently revested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, ..11P:NmaimillEvilsmillt_detailed plan review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Develo ment Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sectiona 18.130.040, 18.120.180, and 18.130.150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 281 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: A-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY BUL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE 130TH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAJO ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IL' A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AREALiat_1222..., ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. • • ' • , . ■,„ • INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS REL1.TING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON on BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOP, TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER 0,,arz_vaffer AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # CHAIRPERSON: .1111..2 PHONii NUMBER: ..§22=0.22_ Lt orbyi VISTA T s.Vi• tharAntANO 28110AC-00800 TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA 98188 2S110DB-90000 ......, HAYDEN CORPORATION 900 N TOMAHAWK ISLAND DR PORTLAND OR 97217 2S110AC -0 TRIAD TIGARD JAIMITEID PTNSHP ATTN: FREDERICK GRIMM 320 ANDOVER PAR X EAST #120 , SEATTLE WA 2S110AC-00900 TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PTNSHP ATTN: FREDERICK GRIMM 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA 2S110DB.41031 NEHM, RACHEL TRUSTEE 15373 SW 114TH CT TIGARD OR 97224 28110DH-91041 JOENS, GERTRUDE L 15373 SW 114TH CT #104 TIGARD OR 97224 2511008-91052 SKXHAR, WILLIAM AND GENEVIEVE R 15373 SW 114TH #105 TIGARD OR 97224 28110D0-91062 BOURLAND, JUANITA 15373 SW 114TH CT #106 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110D13-91071 HENDERSON, ROBERT D AND JOYCE T 15371 SW 114I1 CT UNIT 107 TIGARD OR 97224 2S11008-91081 4.6444446044o4d04e..44 ROARK, CLYDE 0/MABY 15371 SW 114TH CT #108 TIGARD OR 97224 25110r13-91092 WILLOUGHBY, GEORGE F AND SYLVIA R 15371 SW 114TH CT #109 TIGARD OR 97224 ''--16110532:01102 TAYLOR, RICHARD X AND RUTH NADINE 15371 SW 114TH CT #110 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH 11545 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 FRANK WOOD PO 80X 151 CLACKAMAS OR 97015 SUB CARVER 10155 SW HCODVIEW DR TIGARD OR 97224 25110CA -- 90000 KING CITY CONDO UNIT OWNERS BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO 15300 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S110CA -90043 ANDERSON, CLAUDIA A 15100 SW CROWN DR #8 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110CA -90: BECKWITH, R JONES, 8040 SW POR; LZ x " H AND ES E ROADMOOR TERRACE OR 97225 2S110CA -90044 •...••..... ....... BRADFILH, NORMA J 15150 SW 133RD TIGARD OR 9722) 2S110CA.-90045 COLEMAN, DOUGLAS J 15100 SW CROWN DRIVE #6 KING CITY OR 97224 2S110CA -- 90047 GILBERT, VIRGINIA LEE 15100 SW CROWD DR NO. 4 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110CA- 90046 WALKER, GORDON V WALKER, SUSAN 8 WALKER, MAXINE 15100 SW CROWN DR #5 KING CITY OR 97224 281100A•90048 HILL, GEORGE ALBERT MARY 0 15100 SW CROWN DRIVE #3 KING CITY OR 97223 2S11OCA- 90049 .4.........4.4. «6666. HOLMAN, WILLIAM C HOLI'MAN, SUSAN 1K 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND OR 97225 2S110CA -90050 GLEASON, A DIXON BROWN, WALTER L AND GERALDINE M 4860 E MAIN T -3 MESA AZ 85205 28110CA -90068 WHITNEY, INA E AND MOLT, HERTRA A 11520 SW MAJESTIC N0.1 KING CITY OR 97224 4 .. i•. • • 0.• 2S110CA- ✓90069 JOHNSTON, CLARENCE W HELEN H 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN, #2 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110CA -90090 ..4. +....x4.44.4....6 WARRENS, EMRETT L ¶8170 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 25110DB -00700 .4...•.••P.4i KxELHORN, ID ET AL 9005 NW •. ^i I'LL UJ PORTLA OR 97229 2S l ti,nr, -- 90091. 6 4.4 4 6666.. ROGERS, WILLIAM L 15060 LW 15OTH BEAVERTON OR 97007 444414440 2S110D5 -00900 PECTK, CHARLES BETTY VERtE 11000 SW VE ST TIGARD . 91224 28110013-00400 06440 4.,144d1Y••. 4 Ya LUTON, ROBERT PO 80X 8041 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 2S110D8-00200 TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA. 98188 2511008 -00500 4.•44.11..14.•.44.4444 •KASCH'S GARDEN CENTERS NURSERIES, INC 2500 SE TACOMA PORTLAND OR 97202 28110CA -90000 KING CITY CONDO UNIT OWNERS BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO 15300 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2811OCA -90043 ANDERSON, CLAUDIA A 15100 SW CROWN DR #8 TIGARD OR 97224 28110CA -9 1 BECKWITH, �;. AND JONES, CI. ES E 8040 SW ROADHOOR TERRACE PORT OR 97225 28110CA -90044 BR1ADPISH, Noma J 15150 SW 133RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S110CA -90045 COLEMAN, DOUGLAS J 15100 SW CROWN DRIVE #6 KING CITY OR 97224 2S110CA0-90047 . .. . a ... ... . . GILBERT, VIRGINIA LEE 15100 SW CROWN DR NO. 4 TIGRD OR 97223 28110CA -90046 WALKER, GORDON V WALKER, SUSAN B WALKER, MAXINE 15100 SW CROWN DR #5 KING CITY OR 97224 2S110CA'-90048 HILL, GEORGE ALBERT MARY 0 15100 SW CROWN DRIVE 03 KING CITY OR 97223 20110CA- 90049 HOLMAN, WILLIAM C HOLMAN, SUSAN M 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND OR 97225 28110CA -90050 GLEASON, A DIXON % BROWN, WALTER L AND GERALDINE M 4860 E MAIN h' -3 MESA AZ 85205 281100A- -90068 WHITNEY, INA E AND MOLT, BERTHA A 11520 SW MAJESTIC NO.1 KING CITY OR 97224 2S1100A. -90090 .4'004'8000 WARRENS, EMRETT L 8170 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 ... 2S110CA -90069 JOHNSTON, CLARENCE W HELEN H 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN, #2 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110CA- 09009 i • • • . ROGERS, WITZIAM L 15060 SW 150TH BEAVERTON OR 97007 25110DB -00700 KIELHORN, ID ET AL 9005 NW C. ELL RD PORT OR 97229 2S110DB -00800 28110D8 -00900 6.6'66.',.•6 PECK, CHARLES k. BETTY VERNE 11000 SW , VE ST TIGARD,RP 97224 25110DB- -00400 . N, ROBERT LUTON, PO BCX 8041 BLACK BUTTE RCH DR 97759 ryry q y� 2S110DB -00200 • . 4. 00886 o•,46 i. 4. i.. TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA 98188 28110D13 00500 6i66..6446.4466664446 KASCH'S GARDEN CENTERS NURSERIES, INC 2500 SE TACOMA PORTLAND DR 01202 2S11ODB •00800 •....... ..... 28110W..00800 TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 320 ANOOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA 98188 251IODP- •90000 HAYDEN CORPORATION 900 N TOMAHAWK ISLAND DR PORTLAND OR 97217 2S11.0AC -0t 1 • «•••A•• •.••.......• TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PTNSNP ATTN: FREDERICK GRIMM 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEAT'T'LE WA 98188 2S110AC -00900 .•••••.••. TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PTNSHP ATTN: FREDERICK GRIMM 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST #120 SEATTLE WA 98188 28110DID -91031 •.. KEkHM, RACHEL TRUSTEE 15373 SW 114TH CT TIGARD OR 97224 28110DD -91041 'OEN8, GERTRUDE L 15373 SW 114TH CT #104 TIGARD OR 97224 2$11ODB- 91052 SKYHAR, WILLIAM AND GENEVIEVE R 15373 SW 114TH #105 TIGARD OR 97224 28110)8 -9106 2 SOURLAND, 1UANITA 15373 SW 114TH CT #106 TIGARD OR 97224 23110DBw91071 HENDERSON, ROBERT D AND JOYCE T 15371 SW 114TH CT UNIT 107 TIGARD OR 97224 2S1101:0- 91081 ..................... ROARK, CLIME S/MA.RY 15371 SW 114TH CT #108 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB- ,91032 b • • WILLOUGHR'Y , GEORGE F AND SYLVIA R 15371 SO 114TH CT #109 TIGARD OR 97224 .2S110DB -91102 r••••••••" TAYLOR, RICHARD K AND RUTH NADINE 15371 SW 114TH CT #110 TIGARD OR 97223 REQ17/S2.221.1CO__NIMMIYIE DAV: March 25 1993 Tigard Planning Department CONITETIONAL USE CUP 93-0001 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PDR 93-0003 TIGARD COTENANT CHURCH (NPO #6) A request for Pkarinadayelopmentssiotatall plAtligkriew for development of an approximately 34,000 square foot church and related facilities on an approximately 5.7 acre site Conditional Use review approval is concurrently requested to allow development of the church at this site. Religious assemblies are allowed as conditional uses in the R-25 zoning district. In addition, Planned Dent detailed pja_n_ review approval is requested for the initial approximately 10,000 square foot phase of the development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Planned Develo ment Review: Community Development Code Section 18.80.120: Conditional Use Review: Community Development Code Sections 18.130.040, 18,120.180, and 18.13 .150 (C) 10; and associated Code Chapters 18.56, 18.96, 18.100, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, and 18.164. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the SW Pacific Highway and SW Naeve Street (WCTM 2S1 10DB, tax lot 300) ZONE: R-25(PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre with the Planned Development Overlay zone) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by 1993. You may Use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to respond b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Istry.Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: �✓/ NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 1. N NPO NO. (2) copies �c 2. CITY 7AR3OENTS // I i uild!,ng Official /Brad R. C�.'ty Recardmr Engineering /Chris D. Permita Pacilitator /Viola G. 3. SPECIAL D STRIcLL'( ire District (Pick -up box) Tigard Water, District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Parka & Recreation Board Police Field Operations Tualatin Valley Water District ""° 6501 SW Taylors Perry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. 130 N. First Ave. Billaboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin "--- Mike BOrreson Scott Ring Fred Eberle School Dint No. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Dint. 23J (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Unified Sewerage Agency /8WM Program `-"`r 155 N. First St. liillnboro, OR 97124 /i'CY 10/4h e!evS " J Mott/all ie, I ail 'ikcpr r lath ' ( City of Beaverton Jim 8endry�rx • Principal Planner PO flex 4765 maverton, OR 97076 City of Ring City City Manager 15300 SW 116th Ring City, OR 97224 City of Lake Onwego - City Manager 380 SW A Lake Oswego, OR 97034 I. State highway Division - Bob Doran., PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO 2000 8W 1st ave. Portland, OR 97201 -519P DLCD (CPA's /EOA's) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 :_,... Other City of Durham City Manager PO Box 23463 -3483 Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland Planning Direotor 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 0bOt .. Lidwien Re'mana. . 9002 SE Mcoughlin Blvd. Milwaukie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 91062 5. BPP,CIAI► AGENCIES eneral Telepho►.re Rues Wells 12460 SW Main St. igard, OR 97223 VNNW Natural Gas "'`-"" Scott Palmer .. 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 TCI Cablevietir3 of Oregon Mike gallock 3500 SW Bond St. .,. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Beaverton, OR 97005 6. STATE AGEENCIES Aeronautics Divy (oDo) Division of State Lands Coerce beet. - Mil Park Fish & Wildlife Dept: Of 11nviron. quality 76 i EDEN, AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Offied 0 C.IUER Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - .Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenn®,. 324, Union station Portland, OR 97209 ,R Portland General Else. Brian Moore, 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. Bea rton, OR 97007 Metro Area Communications "--- lanon geWitt Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4086 US West Pete Nelson . 421 8, oak St. Po and OR 97204 Tri -Met Transit Dev. 1Cnak 4012 8B 1,7th Ave. Portland, OR 97202 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]