CUP1990-00001POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
94 92nd Ave., adj. to Cook
Park, 2S1 14A, 1000
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington
City of Tigard
on oath
depose and ea' (Please print)
That I am a yl
The City of Tigard, Oregon.
That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC SEARING FOR:
That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR:
City of Tigard Planning Director
Tigard Planning Commission
igard Hearings Officer
Tigard City Council
A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of
Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named
attached list marked exhibit "s" on the,
said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto
bulletin board on the _ :day of
in the United States Mail on the 1
postage prepaid.
Decision) of which Le attached (Marked
rna at the dress shown on the
day of 19A52_,
attached, ,c s posted on an appropriate
19 L; aria$ deposited
d of 19, °�Q,,,e .,
Prepared Notice / opted cOztjlalggimuligml
Subscribed and sworn /affirm to me
OTC PU1, C
NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My ComMiseion Expires
CITY OF TIGARD
Washington County, Oregon
NOTICE. OF F2N1L ORDFR HY HEARINGS OFFICER
1. Concerning Case Number(s): CUP 90-001 VAR 90-0013
2. Name of Owner: Robertgmal et al
-C:x.tulo 4 4-
Name of Applicant: Same romursa.....u. grams...
3. Address 14520 SW Hawk aidgc±jy_1.,..... City Tigard State OR Zip
4. Address of Property: SW 92nd Avenue ad acent to (look Park
Tax Hap and Lot No(s).: 2S1 14A tax lot 1000
5- Request: AE201.Pat for Conditt22111_1102222RE92.41.12.AUMEJeigE212209.21.!RLA,
four baseball field recr.1111.-Ja30304RE—AM911.244119....12921419.4
PAEhIPAL-AUIULL and rantroold.92WeaniOD.6..-tglIAAM.— senaillive
LigacipApArsvaiisaireestelt_lto
asE,s:iCiatee_:dforrn,ggckgtions Within the 100_21ftmEAlge4211ka
of the Tualatin River. ZONING: R=12 'Residential, 12
unitRLIRE21
6. Action:
Approval as requested
Approval with conditions
Denial
. 7. NotiCe: Notice was published in the .newspaper; •sted 'at oit3i, Hall, and
mailed to:
The applicant and owner(s)
Owners of record within the required distance
The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
Affected governmental agencies
8. rinal Decieion: %�E DECISION SHALL riN FMB& ON a= 27# 1990 uNligss
AN APPEAL IS FILED.
The adoptad findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard city Hall, 13125 SW Hall,
P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
9. 1,Apjaet Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with 18.32.290(B ) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written
appeal may be filed within 10 dayei after notice is given and sent. The
appeal may be submitted on city forms and Must be accompanied by the
appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript costs (varies up to a maximum of
$300.00).
The deadline for filing of an appeal i8 30,0 jp...6. OULY 27, 1990
10, Questions: If you have any qUestioned please all the City of Tigard
.".
Y. a'
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY 1,,IF TIGARD, OREGON
In the matter of an application by Robert Gray Partners ) FINAL ORDER
for land fronting on SW. 92nd north and east of Cook ) CU 90-0001
Park in the R-12 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) SLR 90-0004
I. SUMMARY OF THE REQJEST
The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use (CU) permit and Sensitive Lands
Review (SLR) approval of a plan to develop four softball fields, an accessory building, and
a paved parking lot on a 26-acre parcel in tLe R-12 (Residential) zone next to Cook Palk
and Tigard High School. The area to be developed contains significtint wetlands and is
located in a 100-year floodplain. The applicant proposes to grade the ball field area with
native fill, to import 3,800 yards of gravel for under the paved parking area, to enhance
remaining wetlands, and to fence the ball fields and some of the perimeter of the site. The
Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands have issued permits for the proposed use.
Staff recommended conditional approval of both requests. The applicant accepted the
conditions of approval, except a recommended condition requiring a fence along the east
property line. A sounel system and field lighting are planned in the future, but are not
permitted by the propmed permit. One area resident testified in favor of a bike path along
S.W. 92nd and with concern about noise and traffic that the ball fields would create.
LOCATION: SW 92nd Ave. north and eat of Cook Park (WCTM 251 14a, Tax Lot 1000)
APPLICANT: Robert Gray Partners, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. and Mrs. Robert Gray
SITE AREA: About 26 acres
APPLICABLE LAW: Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.54 (R-12 zone),
18.84- (Sensitive Lands), 18.1.00 (Landscaping and Screening), 18.106 (Parking), 18.130
(Conditional Uses), 18.164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditional approval
EXAMINER'S DECISION: Conditional approval
IL FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS
A. Site si 2,. and shape :
The site contains 26 acres. The proposed development will be limited to the southern
20 acres of the parcel. The area to be developed is 680 feet (north-south) by 1275 feet
(east-west).
B. Site location
The site is situated at the south end and on the east side of S.W. 92nd Avenue adjoining
Cook Park.
Page 1 - Bearings Officer decision
CU 90-0001 and SLR 90-0004 (Robert Om harmers)
C. Existing uses and structures
The property is currently undeveloped.
D. Proposed uses and structures
1. The applicant will build four softball fields on the south 20 acres of the site.
a. 'Tot fields will face north and wilt be bout 80 feet from the eastern property
line and 60 feet from the northern property line. Two more fields will face south
and will be offset slightly to the west of the two northern fields.
b. A roughly 1 00 -foot pedestrian and service vehicle corridor will be situated
between the northern and southern sets of fields. An 800- square foot concession
stand /restroom building will he Situated in the midd of the pedestrian area.
c. A roughly 52,000-square foot paved parking lot is proposed for the southwest
corner of the property, adjacent to 92nd Avenue. The parking lot will contain about
114 spaces. Assuming there are 24 vehicles associated with each softball game,
then a total of 96 spaces are the minimum needed for the proposed use
d. The applicant will retain or enhance about 6.5 acres of wetlands around the
perimeter of the development area and will fence the area between the development
and the wetlands. The applicant originally proposed to fence the whole site, too,
but deleted the perimeter fence at the hearing.
E Existing and proposed vegetation
1. The northern 6 acres of the site is a slope up to the high school property. er The slope
is covered with a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees, No development is
proposed on the northerly 6 acres at this time, The southern twenty acres of the site are
vegetated with a mixture of grasses, low brush and wetland plants.
to remove about 4 2 existing
pp ` grade wetland and
create abou3.72 acre of new wetland and to retains and enhance about 3,8 acres of
wetland. To establish and enhance wetlands, the applicant will create shallow ponds
and plant the shoreline with 205 specified plants, including more than 100 trees, To
comply with the City Code, the applicant will plant about 30
.... st reet trees (Hawthorne)
alon g S,W.92ndi Avenue. The applicant proposed 1 -inch caliper street trees; minimum
2 -inch caliper trees are required by City Code.
F. Topography and drainage
a i i °...
lain elevation is 126 feet, Most of the site is below ow 12
��� e development area is within the 100-year flood plain of the Tualatin River, The
p 120 feet,
`. l niopt f the will
about 7,500 cubic yards of soil from the site to drain and
2 The a icons w l use , � g
level Meld area and build a drainage swale along the east edge of the
rite, At the end of the drainage swale will be a ditch inlet and about 54 feet of concrete
pipeline eline to the Tualatin River. The water will discharge onto about three yards drip
. g ,. y P
rap at the end of the outfall,
Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision
CU 90 -0001 and SLR 90.0004 (Robert Grey Partners)
'k1
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]