The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP1997-00007 • � � . �. 120 DAYS � Z/Z�I�� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Sliaping A Better Cvmmunity CITY OF TIGARD `YVasfcirBton County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c� BY THE NEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ICUP]91-000] Case Name(s): ST.ANTNONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Name of Owner: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland In Qreqon Name of Applicant: St. Anthony's Parish Attention: Leslie Sieq Address of Applicant: 9905 SW McKenzie Street City: Tiqard State: Ore on Zip: 97223 Address of Property: 9870 SW Johnson Street City: Tigard State: Oreqon Zip: 97223 Tax Map(s)/Lot No(s).:WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. RequeSt:—�A request to develop a 72 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. lAIIC: R-4.5; Residential, 4.5 units per acre. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. ACtl011: —> ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: � Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental agencies � The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s) Fnal Decision: � THE DECISION SHAtL BE FINAL ON WEDNES�AY NOVEMBER 19,1991 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS�ILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M.ON NOVEMBER 19,1997. QUeSti011S: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING l0T NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER . . . � • - BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, UREGON Regarding an applicadon by St. Anthony's Parish ) F I N A L O R D E R for a condiaonal use pernnit for a 72-space pazldng lot ) to serve esisting church and accessory uses at Johnson ) CUP 97-0007 Street and Grant Avenue in the City of Tigazd, Oc�egon ) (S� Anthony's parking) I. SL;rMMARY . The applicant requests approval of a condidonal use permit(CUP) for a major modificaaon to an existing church and accessory uses under CDC 18.130.OSO.A.S. Two parcels are involved. The church already owns the corner parcel, where up to 47 parking spaces could be developed. The church may purchase the parcel to the west and develop it for the remainder of 72 parking spaces proposed for the combined lot These spaces will serve the existing church and its accessory uses. The parking lot will have one driveway onto Johnson Street and one onto Grant Avenue. The applicant proposes a 10-foot wide landscape buffer around the parking lot, instead of the 20-foot buffer generally required between a parking loc and surrounding single family homes. In exchange, the applicant proposes landscaping in the buffer in excess of Ciry standazds. A hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application. City staff recommended condiaonal approval of the CUP. Two wimesses testified for the applicant and accepted the fmdings and condiaons of approvals recommended by Ciry staff. Two wimesses testified with concerns about buffering the parking lot from surrounding homes and about the ongoing soil remediadon on part of the site, among ocher issues. One wimess testified in support. No one eLse appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application, and the applicant waived its right to have the record held open The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the conditional use permit subje�t to condirions recommended by staff with modifications. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit subject to the conditions at the end of this final order. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue;WC'TM 2S 102BB, tax lots 01700 and 01640 COMPREHENSNE PLAIV: Low Densiry Residendal (1-5 dwelling units/acre) ZOrtING: R-4.5 (Detached single family residenaal) APPLICANT: S� Anthony Parish OWNER: St� Anthony Parish and Harris Oil Company APPLICABLE LAW: Communiry Developraent Code ("CDC") Chapters 1832, 18.�0, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Nearings D�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthorry's Parking) Page 1 � ' - � ' � � II. HEARING AND RECOR.D 1. The Ciry subjected the applicacion to the procedures for a conditional use permit, and gave dmely notice for a hearing at which public testimony could be offered regarding the applicadon. Hearings�fficer Larry Epstein held such a hearing and closed the public record at the end of the hearing. The public record in this matter includes Exhibit A(Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). The written testimony includes the Staff Report dated October 6, 1997, relevant written material received by the Communiry Development Deparanent before the hearing and material the hearings officer received at the hearing. E�chibits are filed at Tigard Ciry Hall. 2. Before the hearing, the hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area. He observed the exisdng access, vegecation, and grades on che site and adjoining properry, the large fenced hole on the site and the condition of the adjoining streets. At the hearing, the hearings officer disclosed the substance of his site visiG 3. At the hearing,Mazk Roberts testified for the City and summarized the Staff Report. He noted the proposed parking lot will bring the church complex more nearly into comQliance with current Ciry parking standards. He identified the applicable standards. He summarized proposed landscaping. He discussed street dedication and 'unprovement requirements,noting it would be disproportionate to require the applicant to dedicate for and to unprove SW Grant Avenue,but that the applicant could choose to do so i�it is done consistent with City standards. He discussed the status of the soil remediation process on the Hazris Oil property the church may acquire,noting that the City recommends the applicant be required to provide a written statement from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DE� that the remediadon process i�complete before the City issues a permit allowing the applicant to develoQ the part of the property where remediation is underway. 4. Landscape architect Edward Ceccacci and Father Leslie Sieg testified for the applican� a. Mr. Ceccacci accepted the Staff Report. He described the neighborhood meeting the applicant held. He said the applicant may dedicate and improve Grant Street The applicant wants to preserve an option to develop a parldng lot containing up to only 47 spaces if the applicant does not acquire the Harris Oil property. He described a lot with only 47 spaces. He agreed to work on buffering headlights, and requested tlexibili[y regarding landscaping. Mr. Roberts t,estified that the applicant could apply to reduce the number of parking spaces as a minor modificadon to the CUP. See CDC 18.130.060. b. Father Sieg testified that the church is monitoring the soil remediation process being conducted by contractors for Harris Oil, but does not control that process. He was uncertain how long it would take. He said that, before the applicant acquires the Harris Oil property, it would require Hanis to provide a written statement from DEQ cemfying the process is complete, and no fur[her action is needed due to soil contamination. 5. Bill Tubbs and Keith Bemis testified. a. Both shared concerns about the soil remediation process underway on the Harris Oil porrion of the site. The reladvely large hole is Filled with water that poses a potenaal hazard, and emi[s odors and has visual impacts that are inconsiscent with land uses in the vicinity. It is surrounded by a temporary chain link fence. They advocaced for rapid completion of che work. Nearings Offces Final O�der CCIP 97-0007 (St. Anthony's Parking) Page 2 - ' � • ' � � � b. Neither objected to the proposed parking lot, but both argued for a sight- obscuring fence along the southwest and south edges of the site (where the applicant's plans do not provide for one). c. They aLso asked about pocendal partitioning of the Harris Oil portion of the site (because the back potion of that lot will not be used for the proposed parking lot). An easement roughly c�ntered on the west edge of the Harris Oil portion of the site provides access to the Harris Oil lot and three lots to the south and southwes� They are concerned that development not adversely affect their access to the easement d. They also expressed concern about noise, lights and other impacts that could result from unauthorized use of the pazking lot after hours, and asked how the parking lot woixld be secured against such use. e. Mr. Tubbs also asked if a Ponderosa pine tree on the southwest corner of the site would be preserved. Mr. Ceccaci responded that it is unclear whether the tree is on the site; a survey is planned. 6. Mary Wagner, a member of the church, testified about her observations of the property for the past 40 years. She opined that the proposed use would enhance the site. III. APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RESPONSIVE FINDINGS 1. City staff pmvided basic facts about the site and vicinity in section III flf the Staff Report They recommended the hearings officer approve the application, based on the applicable standards and responsive fmdings in section N of the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval in section II of the Staff Report. The applicant accepted the findings and recommended condiaons without coirecdon or objecdon. 2.The hearings officer concurs in the analysis and conclusions offered by city staff; to wit, substantial evidence in the record shows the proposal does or can comply with the applicable standards and criteria for a conditional use permit,and adopdon of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or miagate pocential adverse impaccs of the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Communiry Development Code ("CDC"). The hearings o�cer adopts the findings and conclusions in the October 6 Staff Report as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 3. The greatest concern with the site for residents around the site is the soil clean-up process occuiring on the east poraon of the Harris Oil property. However the City does not have jurisdiction over that process; it is not a"land use"that requires development review or the like. Arguably a grading penr►it could be required, but that is not relevant to che conditional use permi� DEQ has statutory jurisdicaon and substancive expertise to oversee clean-up of a site contaminated by oil, and that agency is doing so, based on che cesamony. The condidon recommended by Ciry staff--- �'��at the apQlicant provide a written statement from DEQ that no furcher work is needed to decontaminace the affected pordon of the site before the City issues a permit to develop it---is the most the City can require. 4. There was concern that headlights from cars in the pazldng lot would shine off- site to the south and west where there are single family homes. There is a board-on-board fence along a portion of the west property line, but that dces not protect other areas. The applicant proposed speci�ic numbers and spacing of plant materials shown in the applican['s preliminary landscape plan to buffer the site. Staff recommended enhancing that plan. See proposed condiaon of approval 19. Hearings O�`Icer Fina!Order CUP 97-0007(St. Anthony's Parking) Page 3 • ' � ' ' � � a. The hearings officer has authority to requi�screening and buffering as a condidon of approval of a conditional use permit.l b. CDC 18.130.04(}.A.1 requires that a conditional use be situated on a site "the size and dimensions [of which] provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use." In this case,the site is not deep enough or wide enough for the applicant to development the number of parking spaces the applicant proposes to develop on the site AND a 20-foot buffer on the west and south. The applicant proposes only a 10-foot wide buffer. Therefore, unless the applicant provides landscaping and/or other screening sufficient to provide at least as much mitigation as would a 20-foot wide landscaped buffer, the application does not comply with CDC 18.130.040.A.i. c. The minimum landscaping betwe�n a parking lot and single family dwelling is described in CDC 18.100.080, .110 a.nd .130.2 The hearings officer finds the 1 CDC 18.130.040.0 provides in relevant part tbat"[t]he Hearings Officer may impose condidons... These condidons may include but are not limited to the following: 7. Requiring landscaping,screening.drainage and surfacing of parking and loading a�eas... 10. Requiring berming,scieening,or landscaping and the estabiishment of srandands for their installaaon and maintenance; 11. Requiring and designaang the size,height,locaaon and materials for fences..." 2 CDC 18.100.080.B provides: A buffer area may only be occupied by ucilides,screening,sidewalks and bikeways,and lanciscaping. No buildings,accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in the buffer area except whece an accessway has been approved by the City. CDC 18.100.080.D provides thac["]the minim�improvemenu within a buffer area shall consisc of the fotlowing: 1. At least one row of trees shall be planted[according to reqnirements for spacing and height at plandng). 2. In addition,at least 10 five galloa shrubs or 20 one gallon sluvbs shall be planted far each 1000 square fe�t of required buffer area. 3. "Ibe remaining area shall be plan[ed in lawn,aroundcover or spread wit6 barfc mulch. CDC 18.100.080.E provides: Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those for buffering: 1. A hedge of nairow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted wluch will form a four foot continuous screen within two years of planting;or 2. An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a continuous screen six feet in height within two years...:or 3. A five foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a con[inuous sight obscuring screen[subject w the sight distance requirements of CDC 18.102]. CDC 18.100.110.A.1 provides the following standard for screening of parking and loading areas: Ncarings Ojf'�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthorry's Parking) Page 4 • ' � ' ' � � - applicant proposes to provide more plants than required by CDC 18.100.080, .110 and .130. However the hearings officer also finds the proposed landscape materials are generally low-growing. Proposed trees will create a canopy over time, but do not obstruct headlights. A fence is not proposed. The hearings officer tinds the proposed landscaping does not adequately buffer the homes southwest and south of the site. d.The hearings officer finds the applicant can adequately buffer the west and south edges of the pazldng lot by installing a minimum 6-foot high sight-obscuring fence on or neaz the property line (set back from Grant Avenue as needed for sight distance) or a three-foot high berm planted with evergreen shrubs capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years of planting or other landscaping (larger at planting) capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years. The precise design of that landscape buffer is not in the record,but the applicant can prepare a landscape buffer plan (hopefully with the advice and comment of neighbors) and the City staff can review and appmve an appropriate plan that provides the final detaiLs for the buffer. Condition of approval 19 should be modified accordingly. e. There is a fence on a portion of the west property line. City sraff opined that fence and the 10-foot wide landscape strip buffers the residents of the home to the west from the pazking lot But the fence on the abutting residential property could be removed or fall into decay,negaring its value as a buffer. It is the applicant's responsibility to buffer the use, not the adjoining single family neighbor. Therefore, although it may be duplicative in the short term, the hearings officer fmds the applicant should be required to install the same screen (i.e., fence or wall, landscaped berm or larger landscaping) on the whole west side of the parking lot buffer. Condition of approval 19 should be mod�ed accordingly. 5. There was concern that lights that illuminate the site would shine off-site. The hearings officer finds such an impact would violate CDC 18.106.020.P.1, which provides that"lighrs provided to illuminate any public or private parking area... shall be so arranged as to direct light away from any adjacent residential distric�" a. The hearings officer fmds there is insufficient infornnadon in the record to determine whether the proposed lights will in fact shine off-site. However the hearings officer further finds that it is feasible for the applicant to submit additional information from which the planning manager can determine that proposed lights will not shine off-site. Light fixtures can be selected or fitted with hoods or deflectors to prevent light from being ca.st off-site. Condition of approva121 should be modified accordingly. 6. The hearings officer agrees with Mr. Roberts that the applicant could apply for a minor modification to rhe conditional use permit to allow a smaller parking lot(i.e., one containing up to 47 spaces on the property at 9870 SW Johnson Street), and the City could grant such a modification. However the hearings officer further finds that the potential for unpacts due to headlights and other lighting on the site is the same whether 47 or 72 spaces are created. Therefore, if the planning manager approves a minor modification to the conditional use permit, that modificauon should continue to *equire compliance with condidons of approval of this CUP to mitigate the impacts of headlights and site lightinQ. a. Landscaped pazking areas shall include special design features which effecavely screen the parking lot from view... CDC 18.100.130 contains a buffer matrix. Hearings O�cer Final Order CUP 97-000� (St. Anthorty's Parking) Page 5 - ' • ' ' � � - 7. It is not clear from the record whether the applicant proposes to develop land over which an easement exists that precludes such development. That is, the unrebutted testimony in the record is that there is an easement over the west several fe�t of the Harris Oil portion of the site. The unrebutted testunony in the record is that owners of that property and at least three other properties have a right of access to that easement If that unrebutted testimony is correct, then the applicant cannot use the west several feet of the Harris Oil property for a buffer for the parking lot, because that would conflict with the rights of the benefited parties under the easement. Although the City dces not enforce the private easement,the existence of such an easement is a fact that is relevant in deciding whether the site is large enough to accommodate the conditional use. If the easement exists and prevents the applicant from developing the west several feet of the landscape scre.�n and buffer, the applicant would have to amend the site plan w move the south edge of that screen and buffer a corresponding distance north. This can be resolved in a final site plan review process. A condidon of approval is warranted requiring the applicant to show whether such an easement exists (e.g., based on a preliminary tide insurance report), and, if so, to modify the site plan accordingly. 8. Access to the parldng lot should be controlled to prevent unauthorized use that could conflict with the peaceful occupancy of surrounding homes. Such controls need not be overly restricdve, but some accommodadon and protocol should be reached to address this issue. In the site review application,the applicant can propose a specific method or methods (e.g., gating the entries, providing security patrols, providing emergency telephone contact numbers for neighbors,etc.), and the plamm�g manager can review and aQprove appropriate measure(s). A condition of approval to this effect should be added N. CONCLUSION AND DECISION l. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Tigard Communiry Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. The applicant's request, CUP 97-0007, is herebv approved, subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report,with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 19 is hCreby amended to read as follows: 19. The applicant shall submit and receive approval of a revised landscape plan before the City approves a building or development permit for the parldng lot. (a) The revised plan shall provide for landscaped secbacks along Johnson Street and Grant Avenue at least as wide and at least as landscaped as shown on the preliminary plan. (b) A minimum 10-foot wide landscaped buffer strip shall abut the west and south edges of the parking lot. (1) At the outside edge of that strip, the revised plan shall provide a minimum 6-foot high siaht-obscuring fence or wall or a three-foot high l�rm planted with eve�areen shrubs capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years of planting or other landscaping (larger at planring) capable of Nearings Offcer Fina!Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthony's Pa�king) Page 6 ' ' � ' ' � � - providing a condnuous 6-foot high screen within two years. Fencing and vegetadon shall be set back from Johnson Street and Grant Avenue as needed for sight distance. (2) The applicant may alter the nature, number, size and/or spacing of landscape materials shown on the preliminary plan to achieve a buffering and screening effect equal to or greater than that achieved by the preliminary plan with amendments recommended by City staff. If the applicant proposes landscaping substantially similar to that proposed in the preliminary plan, the revised plan shall provide for a row of trees within the west and south landscape strips, consistent with spacing standards in the CDC, and shall provide for at least 50 five-gallon shrubs within the western landscape strip. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. (c) The applicant shall propose measures to prevent unauthorized access to the parking lot when it is not used for the church or its accessory uses and to facilitate enforcement when needed. The planning manager shall approve such measures if they provide reasonable protection against unauthorized use of the property at times or in a manner that would interfere with the peaceful occupancy of homes in the viciniry. The planning manager may order or allow changes to the measures over tune based on experience with the lo� b. Condition of approva120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 20. Before the City approves a building or development permit auchorizing development of the pordon of the site owned by Harris Oil, the applicant shall amend the preliminary plan to reflect the ezistence and limitaaans imposed by an easemenc over the west ed;e of that portion of the site or shall show that such an easement does not ezist or does not restrict use of the property as proposed. STAFF CONfACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. c. Condition of approva121 is hereby amended to read as follows: 21. The applicant shall provide a securiry lighting plan to the Police Department and to the planning manager for review and approval. The plan shall show lighdng levels on and off site. The planning manager shall approve the plan if light fixtures do noc cast more than one foot-candle of light onto residendal poperty. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Woif(Police Depacvnenc) and i�Iark Roberts (Planning Division). DATE ' 21st day of ber, 1997. Larry Epste�, CP Tigard He � Offi er Hearings Offcer Final Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Arttirorty's Parking) Page 7 , • . � . , + Y Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: October 13L1997 Time: 7:00 PM �'" � ` .� _r ,� ": :�- � :��°� � � ; � ;� . ,��, � ::�,�� :w ST' _ REPORT TO.THE _=-� x� � �r,: . �� ,:. � �-a ¢� ,v � � � c.� � �� ,�, u� � �,c-�,��a� > .; ,��>�S , ��'"�,�"'�' ,`'�z" '`�:,� , � :. .i�� .�t*�4� ' �,,. ..e��t�rn,t;�- � � >��;t� x � � . ;�� , � ,.H � �� .�. �� . _�.� , ,�- , �� << .�� - . EARIN 'S OFFICE �y ��_ � �� -.r f�� . 'P ja�* 'f"' � � �f ��'�1C�TY OF T10ARD -y�f �. �K,y .'z f.4�j-'y:,.{�}�}t;y a-:�'��4. � ' c.;L,>- kl`i...��.��:q.��i`i�t�,�:: i ,�+� ., 'z'.+1� r..�. ..� �,�.. � .�FOR;THE,CIT`�OF TIGARD -.�. }. �:- �� .::.� .,��r.��t �- ��-��:��_�:� � - - ��OREGON�� :�� -� �;' _ ��- SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FiLE NAME: SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0007 APPLICANT: Saint Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop Attention: Leslie Sieg of Portland in Oregon 9905 SW McKenzie Street 2838 E. Bumside Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 �WNER: Harris Oii Company c/o Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard P.O. Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a 72 space overflow par{cing lot. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lot 01600 and 01700. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, 1-5 Dwelling Units Per Acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religious assembly and uses related to religious assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adverse{y affect the health, safety and welfare of the City.: Therefore, staff recommends�-.�APPROVAL,y subject �to .the foNowing� recommended conditions of approval = . . - - . STAFF pEPORT TO THE HEARING•S OFFlCEH CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTFIONV'$OVEAFIOW PAFiKfNG LOT PAGE 1 OF 15 � • • ^ , , M _ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL , r., - � .:�-, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE QF A BUILDING PERMIT,- ': THE FOL:LOWING CONDITiQNS SHALL BE SATiSFlED ` i : �t ; . ,. ,.� a ..., �,�r. ti,. �.,� -,,�,. ��,� .. _ � �.�. � � �,�,w� (Unless�o#�herw�se'�noted�the.staff contact,shalt^be�Br�an Rage�� t ,� -. - � ,t� a'�,�� ..� �L-�`��„;;a° Engineering Department (503)'639-4171.j: -.� •: � _ �• 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Johnson Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centeriine. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. If the applicant elects to dedicate additional right-of-way to the Public along the frontage of SW Grant Street to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerfine, the description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerfine. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Johnson Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff; E. five-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing ovefiead utilities); I. street signs (if applicable); J. driveway apron (if applicable); and STAFF REPORT TO THE NEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•SAl1YT APfT}iONYS OVERFLOW PAAKING LOT PAGE 2 OF 15 .* � . • � . K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Johnson Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 6. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on foRns provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Grant Street. 7. If the applicant chooses to make half-street improvements to SW Grant Street, they should include that work as a part of the public improvement plans and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 8. Profiles of SW Johnson Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City, of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. 10. lf the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility. 11. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave a proposed development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or dwellings, the downstream stormwater system shall be enlarged to relieve the identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an on-site detention facility. 12. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 13. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 14. The applicant shall either place the existing ovefiead utility lines along SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. lf the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the site permit. STAFF IiEPORT TO TNE HEAqING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAIPfT ANTHONYS OVERFLOW PAAKING lOT PAGE 3 OF 15 • � . . • ' •, 15. Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Funk, Building Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. STAFF CONTACT: Maric Roberts, Planning Division. 17. The applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. The previous oil sales site is presently partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of permits to redevelop this property. STAFF CONTACT: Maric Roberts, Planning Division. 19. Along the northwesteriy property line the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a minimum of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 20. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees that are spaced in compliance with the minimum spacing standard based on their size at maturity within the westeriy buffer area. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 21. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan to the Police Department for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf, Police Department. 22. An arl�orist report shall be provided that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed. The report shall also review any special construction techniques that will be needed to be used to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional tree(s) then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. Also. if the Sequoia trees cannot be preserved a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. : - �THE FOLLOWlNG CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED , . :y _� � ,; PRIOR TO A F1NAL BUILDING AND/OR SITE INSPECTION._ , „ 4;; . � :: ��(Untess:otherwise"noted, the staff conta�ct shal( be Brian°Rager; , . � �' , ' . � : Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) , � 23. Prior to final site inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•$AINT ANTHONY'S OVERROW PARKING l0T PAGE 4 OF t 5 , i . • � . 24. Prior to a final site inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-buiit drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a dislcette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise °DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 25. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311. ` '� THIS APPROVAL SHALL'BE VAUD�FOR=fi8 M�NTHS � M.rxr_un.. . .t + .�L +.tF" . • � ..,..: �., .. .. . � �. �� ` �';;��' , �FROM 9THE EFFECTIVE DATE.OF,THIS=DECISION: '�;.r ti i i ;:-:: r�t-.��.�•sa°s r^ke... .�i.ia tr . „ .� ' . . SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: The subject properties are presently undeveloped. One of the two properties has previously been used for an oil sales use and has since, been discontinued. The site was cleared of the structures that utilized the property for that purpose. Presently, a portion of this property has been excavated. Apparently this has been done to remove contaminated soils. The property at the comer of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue has been used for overflow paricing purposes by the church for several years. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. '�icinitv Information• To the north of the subject properties are existing detached single-family residences. To the south is a portion of the Saint Anthony's Church facilities. To the west of the property is a detached single-family residence. To the east are other detached single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description• The applicant has proposed to develop 72 parking spaces as an overflow parking lot for related religious assembly purposes. A remainder of the former oil sales site is to be left undeveioped for future use. Public Hearing notices regarding this application stated that the overflow parking lot was to consist of 47 spaces based on the information contained within the applicant's narrative. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFlCER CUP 97-0007.$/11NT,qP(Tf10NYS OVEAFLOW pqqK�NG�pT PAGE 5 OF 15 ' � - • ' • ' and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement. The applicant has proposed to construct half street improvements on their SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue street frontages. The Engineering - Department has estimated the cost of half street improvements to be approximately $175.00 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half street improvements to SW Grant Avenue is $42,000.00 (240 ft. x $175.00). Based on past City purchases of property for street right-of-way (ROW), p�operty is assessed at $3.00 per square foot. The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately an additional 2,400 square feet of right-of-way along SW Grant Avenue. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $7,200.00 (10 feet x 240 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $49,200. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half street improvements to SW Johnson Street is $25,725.00 (147 ft. x $175.00). The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately 735 square feet of right-of-way. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $2,205.00 (5 feet x 147 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $27,930. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (T1F) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Because no new building or expansion is proposed, the applicant will be not �equired to pay TIF's. Therefore, no unmitigated impact can be found to exist with the construction of this parking lot. For this reason, the City is not recommending dedication of right-of-way and street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue frontage. The $27,930 of dedication and improvements on the SW Johnson Street apply directly to impacts on the local system. It can be argued for the local street system to function to serve all properties at buildout that streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. The applicant's proposal for improvements provides for the share of local street improvements r�eeded to serve this development in conjunction with the standard improvements that are required of all other properties. In other words, the applicant is paying only for their portion or segment of the local street system. Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. Based on these findings, the City recommends that the Conditions of Approval requiring street right-of-way dedication and improvements along the SW Johnson Street frontage are roughly proportional to the impacts of the development. Although the City has not recommended requiring street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue street frontage, Conditions of Approval have been provided within this report that allow the applicant to provide these improvements, at their discretion, in order to give the site a finished appearance. The test of rough proportionality does not require a precise mathematical calcutation or a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAFiING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•$AIPfT ANTHONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 6 OF 15 r • . Use Classification: e applicant is proposing to build a 72 space overflow parking lot to serve religious assembly services for the Saint Anthony's church. This use is - classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a religious assembly. Code Section 18.50 lists religious assembly as a conditionally permitted use in the R-4.5 Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.50 provides minimum Iot size and setbacks standards. However, these standards are superseded by the Conditional Use Permit standards that are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Setback: Section 18.50 sets front, side and rear yard setback standards for new structures. No new structures have been proposed. However, as reviewed elsewhere within this report Section 18.100 does set standards for land use buffers where a parking lot adjoins a detached single-family residence. Environmental Performance: Section 18.90.020 states in part that each use or activity within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state, federal and state environmental regulations. The previous oi! sales site is presently, partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of peRnits to redevelop this property. - Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. The applicant has a total of 387 feet of lineal frontage on SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. This frontage length would require a minimum of ten new street trees. The applicant has proposed to plant eight new Red Sunset Maple trees and to incorporate two existing Sequoia trees into the site plan for use as street trees. Based on their size at maturity, these trees are considered large specimens and comply with the spacing standard. If the arborist report finds that the two Sequoia trees that are to be incorporated into the site as street trees ca�e preserved as such, a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. . �p� Screeninq and BufferinQ befiween land use tvpes: Section 18.100 sets minimum screen�ng and buffering standards between land use types of varying intensities. Section 18.100 includes a Buffer Matrix Chart that requires a minimum of a 20 foot distance for parking lots with more than 25 parking spaces. At a minimum the buffer must contain the following: 2) a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and 3) shrubs of varying numbers based on their size at planting. Where a screening is also required one of the following must be provided: 1) a row of evergreen shrubs, 2) a five foot minimum height fence, or 3) an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. Alternatively, the Director can approve a modified buffer plan which provides the same level of screening with a different combination of screening and buffering elements. The buffering and screening criteria is not found to be applicable along the limits of the northwesterly portion of the former oil sales site that abuts areas to be developed in the future. This standard would be applicable in the future if the church or other use was to later develop this remainder area. As provided in Section 18.100.070 buffering but not STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFlCER CUP 97-0007.SAINT ANTFIpNy�g pyEpfLpyy pqqpl��OT PAGE 7 pF�5 screening standards ar�Tound to be applicabie along the SW ohnson Street and SW Grant Avenue frontages. The sc�eening and buffering standards are found to be applicable along the northwesterly and westerly property lines because the site adjoins existing residential uses. The applicant has proposed to develop a row of parking spaces within a narrowed buffer area. A 20-foot buffer width is noRnally required between parking lots of 25 spaces or more and detached single-family residences. The applicant has shown a 10-foot buffer width. To utilize a lesser width the applicant must provide increased plantings or other screening and buffering materials that would p�ovide the same level of screening and buffering. For a screening and buffering area along the northweste�ly property line, the applicant has proposed 17 Westem Red Cedar trees spaced at 10 feet on center. The applicant has also proposed approximately 14 Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs. The neighbors existing six-foot fence is also to be used as buffering. The applicant specified on the plans that the majority of the Cotoneaster plantings were five-gallon in size. Assuming that these plantings are all five-gallon plantings, a minimum of 25 are required to be provided for a buffer area of 2,300 square feet. Because the buffer width has been reduced in half, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide double the amount of shrub planting to a total of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. Due to their large size at maturity and tight ten-foot on center spacing, the proposed Westem Red Cedar trees exceed the minimum standard. For buffering and screening along the site's westeriy property line the applicant has proposed a double row of 46, five gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings within a ten-foot buffer width. The applicant has also proposed eight RedTwig Dogwood shrubs planted in the westeriy comer of the property. Because this buffer area is 1,200 square feet in area, a minimum of 24, five-gallon plantings are required where shrubs are used to meet the screening and buffering requirements. The 46 Cotoneaster plantings are approximately two times the minimum standard and are found to partially mitigate for the reduced buffer width. The applicant has not provided a row trees in this area. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees within the weste�ly buffer area. For screening along the property's street frontage on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street, the applicant has proposed a double row of 63, five-gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings and ten street trees, also within a ten-foot buffer width. The buffer area is approximately 3,470 square feet which requires a minimum of 35, five-gallon shrub plantings. The 63 proposed shrubs are nearly double the minimum planting requirements and appear to be sufficient for buffering purposes given that the street right-of-way will also buffer this site from adjoining uses. Screeninq Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materiais to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has proposed a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs to screen the parlcing lot from view. The applicant ST.+,FF REPORT TO T}1E HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-00p7•SAINT ANTNONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 9 OF 15 • � a . has also proposed to provide seven trees throughout the proposed parking Iot of 72 parking spaces. The landscape islands that have been proposed are in excess of the three-foot minimum dimension. A curb has been proposed around the landscape planter islands to protect the proposed plantings. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting righ#-of-ways or th� intersecticn of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-wa� and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shail contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is rr�easured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parkinq: Section 18.106.030 states that churches which use bench or pew seating within the congregation area are required to provide one parking space for every six feet of bench length. A two way drive aisle width of 24 feet is required to be maintained. Minimum parking space sizes of 8'8" by 18' for standard parking spaces and 8' by 15' for compact spaces are required to be provided. The church's Business Manager states that the congregation area currently has a total of 1,666 feet of pew seating. By dividing 1,666 by 6, a total of 278 spaces would be required to serve this facility if it were developed under current standards. The church is currently served by 147 paricing spaces. The proposed overflow parking lot would add 72 spaces for a total of 219. This will still leave a deficit of 58 parking spaces. Because the church was not required to construct this parking lot during the review of previous church expansions and no building expansion is proposed, no specific minimum parlcing ratio has been found to apply to this application. The two-way drive aisle width and proposed parking space :�ze comply with the minimum size standard. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that where up to 100 parking spaces are provided that a minimurr� of one (1) access with a minimum width of 3�-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet shall be provided. The applicant has proposed two driveways for this purpose, in compliance with this standard. A driveway has been proposed on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street. Site Development Review - Approval Standards Section 18.120.180(A)(7) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.32, 18,50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.10fi, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements refated to the provisions of 18.12p.180.(A): (3) (Exterior Elevations), (5) (Privacy and Noise), (6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), (7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), S'AfF pEPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTFpNYS OVERFLOW PARKING!OT PAGE 9 OF 15 • � • � - (8) (Open Space Dedication), (9) (Demarcation of Spaces), (12) (Public Transit), (17) (Signs) and are, therefo�e, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. These sections are addressed elsewhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A): (2) (Tree Removal), (4) (Buffering and Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses, (10) Crime Prevention and Safety), (11) (Access and Circulation), (13) (Parking), (14) (Landscaping), (15) (Drainage), (16) (Provisions for the handicapped), and (18) (Underfying Provisions of the Zone) are addressed immediately below or elsewhere within this staff report: Tree Removal: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) states that building shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Building shall also not be located to in areas subject to slumping and sliding, with adequate provision for light, air, fire fighting capabilities and circulation. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. No buildings are being proposed so portions of this section are not applicable to this request. The applicant has proposed to preserve and incorporate two of the three existing trees onto the site plan for use as street trees. The applicant states that a third tree is to be removed because it is dead. An arborist report is recommended that examines the condition of the tree to be removed and the suitability of the other trees for incorporation into the site as street trees. If the trees are found to be suitable for preservation, the arborist report will also need to provide recommended protection measures during the construction process. Bufferina, Screeninq and Compatibilitv Between Adioininq Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal provided specific screening materials that would be utilized where the parking lot adjoins existing detached single-family residences. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening and buffering plan that is in compliance with the standards of Section 18.100 which is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen the parking lot through the use of a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrub plantings which adjoin the site's frontage on its SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street frontages. The applicant has not proposed to construct storage areas or a building which would require the screening of storage and rooftop equipment. Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and stated that suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid- point at the north and south boundaries. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide rype lighting is preferable. The applicant shall obtain approval of security lighting from the Police Department. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAAING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTFIONYS OVEAFLOW PAAKING LOT PAGE 10 OF t 5 � The proposed landsca ng may at some future time become a potential problem. The parking lot should, at no point, become completely screened from the view of the traveling - public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, (particularly sotitary situations) but also manifests loitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens and/or emergency responders. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parking: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Seciion 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscapinq: Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The Conditional Use Permit invokes applicable standards of the Site Development Review as approval criteria. The landscape section requires that a minimum of 15% of the site be landscaped. The proposed use would be comprised of two separate parcels totaling 1.10 acres. A site of this size requires a minimum of 7,187 square feet of landscaping. The site plan appears to provide in excess of 8,000 square feet of landscaping but no precise calculation has been provided. The applicant shall provide a calcuiation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. Dra�: Section 18.120.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. The Engineering Department has recommended that additional downstream analysis be provided to demonstrate that no existing storm drainage facility deficiency exists. Provisions for the Handicapt�ed: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supptementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. S7AFF REPOqT TO THE HEAAING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0Op7.$qR�fT qNT}ipNY'S OVERFLOW PARI(1hIG�pT PAGE 11 OF 15 lies with all site develo ment �dards set forth within the , - The use, as proposed,�mp p R-4.5 Zoning District and as modified by the Conditional Use Permit standards. It appears that required public facilities can be made available to serve the site as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district can be met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. Two mature trees have been noted on this site that are proposed to be incorporated into the site as street trees. A third tree is proposed to be removed as the applicant states that this tree is dead. An arborist report has been required to investigate the condition of the tree that is stated to be dead and the suitability of the two Sequoia trees for incorporation into the site. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Specific Conditional Use Permit Standard for Reliqious Assembly uses: Section 18.130.150(10) sets specific standards for lot size and setbacks for religious assembly uses. This section provides front, side rear and corner setback standards for new religious assembly structures. This section also requires a 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. No structure has been proposed, therefore, the setbacks standards are not applicable. Each of the two building site's are in excess of the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. Because the two sites would share common site improvements, the applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to incorporate two mature Sequoia trees into the landscape plan. The applicant has also proposed to remove one tree that appears to be dead. Because the only two healthy mature trees on these property's are to be incorporated into the site plan, no tree mitigation is required. The applicant did not provide an arborist report that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed and any special construction techniques that will be need to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. An arborist report shall be provided which addresses these issues. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additiona( trees, then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OfFlCER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONYS OVEAFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 12 OF 15 I � � - PUBLIC F�4CILITY CON NS: . The City has adopted Unified Sewerage Agency standards concerning Water Quality, Grading and Erosion Control requirements are addressed within this portion of the staff report. Provisions for water service to the site has been reviewed. Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) and 18.164.120 (Underground Utilities) sets forth standards for the aforementioned utilities these standards have also been reviewed below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. SW Johnson Street Southwest Johnson Street is classified as a local residential street, west of SW Grant Street, and therefore requires a 50-foot right-of-way (ROW). There is presently 40 feet of total ROW adjacent to this site (20 feet each side of centerline). The applicant should, as a part of developing this site, dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from centerfine. The applicant's narrative indicates that they will provide this dedication. The roadway is paved, but does not meet current City standards for a local residential street. Because this site generates a significant amount of traffic from church services and related activities, and the street is substandard, the applicant should improve the " south side of Johnson Street as a part of this project. A half-street improvement is appropriate in this case. The applicant's narrative indicates that they are willing to improve the street. SW Grant Street Southwest Grant Street is classified as a minor collector street in this area, and requires a 60-foot ROW overall. At present, there is only 40 feet of ROW overall. In order to facilitate the widening of the street to meet City standards, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's narrative indicates they will provide this ROW dedication. This street is also paved, and is fully improved on the east side adjacent to the main church site. However, the west side is not improved to City standards. Although the applicanYs narrative states that they are willing to improve the street, Staff believes that the impact from this parking lot development does not warrant improvement to the minor collector at this time. 18.164.030(A)(1)(c) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a non-remonstrance agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. If, however, the applicant would like to make the additional street improvements, they should obtain the necessary permit from the City Engineering Department. STAFF REPORT TO T}iE HEAAING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SIUM ANTHONYS OVERFIOW PARKING LOT PAGE 13 OF 15 WATER: • � ' � ' There are pubiic water lines in both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Since this project is a parking lot, no additional public water line work is necessary. SANITARY SEWER: There will be no additionai public sanitary sewer line work required. STORM DRAINAGE: The topography of this site slopes to the northwest. There is an existing 12-inch public storm sewer line adjacent to the east side of the roadway. This line carries street runoff toward Fanno Creek. The applicant submitted a downstream analysis, prepared by their engineer, which indicates that the 12-inch line is at or near capacity for carrying the 10- year storm event. It also indicates that the line has only 60% of the capacity required to convey the 100-year storm event. The City's public storm drainage system must be designed to convey a 25-year storm event, as required by USA's Design and Construction Standards. It is not clear from the applicant's materials, whether or not the existing system can adequately convey the additional runoff from this site under 25-year event conditions. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit additional information to the Engineering Department with regard to downstream conditions. If there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the applicant can either upsize that system, or provide on-site detention. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant has indicated that they will provide a water quality facility near the northeast comer of the site. The preliminary calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer indicate the pond will need to be approximately 684 cubic feet. The applicant's site plan will need to accommodate that pond size. The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. ST 1FF REPOFT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANT}ipNYS�VEAFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE t�OF t 5 � , • � GRADING'AND EROSI CONTROL: - USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The 8uilding Division has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Ave�ue shail be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking lot. The Police Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid-point at the north and south boundary. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide type lighting is our preference. The proposed landscaping may at some future time become a potential problem. The parking lot should at no point become completely screened from the view of the traveling public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, particularly solitary situations but also manifests Ioitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens and/or emergency responders. No other corriments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been received. GG%G��CC ��-� � October 6, 1997 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE iate Planner , � � � October 6. 1997 APPROV D BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manag�er i:�c urpin�martcr�cup97-07.dec STAFF REPOfiT TO THE HEAAING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTNONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 15 OF t 5 �• oc i�' coNC sraen sEw� �( FtRE y�'DRANT ' r�� ADOITIO"lA�� pCp.TtON Or ON—S�TH wATER I �� C7t i' WATER LINE Z G7U1.t.1T7 TREATP9QdT HI.51N 11 1 r�r O �c1471NG �GMI — _ — — � � � � PQOPC3tD RAM — � � � G9 AT I.OW �OINT iN �� P4RKING L > — — — ! � w SW JO;-INSON 0 — — — — - — — STREET— � PROP DRAIN LINE � G LOP � C G G G f l! • — G G � � Z I G ' � \ C � t�1.17 Z ' � a � � � . \ c I � inv our-iii.ii � c R�n-��n.ec � .� J � TAl( LOT ti00 G I . . C I�J � � c � � > � � � � � ! W � � � ' r Z � E7CI5TING PLAY FIELDS � sECUreirr � � . c � �� L� G C Q Q C C � �� ` Z �� - - � � - - Q j� H � � c �� '��+ � � � � � � O TAX LOf 1700 G ��J�� , ' I � � I � � � ; I �� I_ ( � � � � � � � � � < < � I� r V -� - - - - � II' I �I � � � ' SITFPLAN cASE Nc�. St Anthony's EXNIBIT MAP Overflow Parking Lot CUP 97-0007 I ! r--- ' I . ` r � � I 'i . . i I � I ' ' � .� \� I � I O ' � , stti�� ; i i � 'F"� ; i � � � , ; � o I � I , 2cn� i L , n � � � ; , i � I ��0 � � i I ! �siQ N ; 0 ; f F,�� > �I � � W 5 ; � 7� ; ..� O � � : � ,�� O S�. � ,o � <-- U B!E � � �. , c� � � — � � P � � � :' � -4�� ; � i T � �t-�c��/ i � F �i � . _ . �-- � sT � O �g , �, +� •— � U i �� Vicinity Mau N CUP 97-0007 St Anthony's �� + O�erflow Parking tot � � C�� i�� -�� f � �� r� _ � . �� - � � � COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le98, P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-036D NOtiCe Tm 8 9 3 9 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 �E C E!V E D Legal Notice Advertising OCT 0 7 1997 • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice , _ 13125 S�� Fiall Blvd. '�Y- �` '=�''~�`" • Tiqard,Oregon 97223 • O Duplicate Affidavi� The following will be considct�l�y the�gard Hearings Officer on Mon- •Aceounts Payable • day,October 13,1997 st 7:00 P.M.,at Tigard Civic Center—Town Hall, I3125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.Both public,oral and written testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter will be con- ducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code,and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer.Failure AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ' to raise an issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidencc sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to STATE OF OREGON, )SS � respond precludes an appeal,and failure to specify the criterion from the COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a com- ment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion.Further infor- �, T{athy Snyder mation may be otitained from the Plannin Division at 13125 5W Hall being first duly sworn, depose and sa that I am the Advertising g Director, or his rinci al clerk, of the�icrard—Tua lat�n Times j �ulevard,Tigard,Oregon or by calling(503)639-4171. P P , PUBLIC HEARING: a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 " CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)97-0007 and 193.020; ublished at Tiaard in the , P >ST.ANTHONY S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT< aforesaid county and sta�e; that the A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services; CUP St Anthon� s Overf low Park�ng Lot ' and related community functions.LOCATION:9870 SW Johnson Street; a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the � WCTM 2S102BB,Tax Lots 01600 and 01700.The site is located at the ONE successive and southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZONE: entire issue ot said newspaper for Residential,4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5.The purpose of the R-4.5 Zoning consecutive in the following issues: District is to establish standatd urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use,the R-4.5 Zoning District alsope rmits October 2,19 97 i religious assembly and uscs related to religious assembly.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50,18.90,18.100,18.102,18.106,18.1OS, 18.120,18.130 and 18.164. ; .� , - '� -��a , � , � -. _... ,-�-�—,y- �; .�� ,� ,� ; . , . � .� �'. Subscribed and sworn to efore me this ��a �a�� ^f n�*^ber,:. . � � J �� . f v N Public for Oregon + My Commission Expires: 4 � � AFFIDAVIT . K I ; °� �� UBIE ; �- p , � ! , 1 � r � � , TT8939—Publish October 2, 1997. � . � Agenda Item: �.1 • Hearing Date: October 13, 1997 Time: 7:00 PM �- _ STAFF REPORT TO THE y': HEARING'S OFFICER �ITY OF TI�ARD FOR TNE,CITY OF TI�ARD,OREGON .�� SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLQW PARKING LOT Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0007 APPLICANT: Saint Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop Attention: Leslie Sieg of Portland in Oregon 9905 SW McKenzie Street 2838 E. Bumside Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Harris Oil Company c/o Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard P.O. Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a 72 space overflow parking lot. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102B6, Tax Lot 01600 and 01700. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, 1-5 Dwelling Units Per Acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religious assembly and uses related to religious assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPRQVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: STAFF REPORT TO TNE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 1 OF 15 , • ! CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: �:� (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, '`" ' Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.} 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (N�TE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Johnson Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. If the applicant elects to dedicate additional right-of-way to the Public along the frontage of SW Grant Street to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline, the description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Johnson Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb and gutter; D, storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff; E. five-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the Ciry Engineer; H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities); I. street signs (if applicable); J. driveway apron (if applicable); and STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCEH CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 2 OF 15 ' . � , K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Johnson Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 6. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Grant Street. 7. If the applicant chooses to make half-street improvements to SW Grant Street, they should include that work as a part of the public improvement plans and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 8. Profiles of SW Johnson Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City, of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. 10. If the capacity of any downstream public storrn conveyance system or culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility. 11. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave a proposed development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or dwellings, the downstream stormwater system shall be enlarged to relieve the identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an on-site detention facility. 12. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 13. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the site permit. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERROW PAFlKING LOT PAGE 3 OF 15 15. Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue . shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Funk, Building Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. The applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. The previous oil sales site is presently partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of permits to redevelop this property. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 19. Along the northwesterly property line the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a minimum of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 20. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees that are spaced in compliance with the minimum spacing standard based on their size at maturity within the westerly buffer area. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 21. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan to the Police Department for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf, Police Department. 22. An arborist report shall be provided that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed. The report shall also review any special construction techniques that will be needed to be used to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional tree(s) then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. Also. if the Sequoia trees cannot be preserved a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A F1NAL BUILDING AND/OR SITE INSPECTION: ��z < , (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, . Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 23. Prior to final site inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONYS OVERFLOW PAFiKING LOT PAGE 4 OF 15 , 24. Prior to a final site inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" foRnat, if available; otherwise "DXF' will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 25. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311. THIS APPR�VAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISI4N. : , SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: The subject properties are presently undeveloped. One of the two properties has previously been used for an oil sales use and has since, been discontinued. The site was cleared of the structures that utilized the property for that purpose. Presently, a portion of this property has been excavated. Apparently this has been done to remove contaminated soils. The property at the comer of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue has been used for overflow parking purposes by the church for several years. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north of the subject properties are existing detached single-family residences. To the south is a portion of the Saint Anthony's Church facilities. To the west of the property is a detached single-family residence. To the east are other detached single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant has proposed to develop 72 parking spaces as an overflow parking lot for related religious assembly purposes. A remainder of the former oil sales site is to be left undeveloped for future use. Public Hearing notices regarding this application stated that the overflow parking lot was to consist of 47 spaces based on the information contained within the applicant's narrative. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS C�MPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANT}iONY'S OVERFIOW PARKING LOT PAGE 5 OF 15 and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion , of a waiver statement. The applicant has proposed to construct half street improvements on their SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue street frontages. The Engineering Department has estimated the cost of half street improvements to be approximately $175.00 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half street improvements to SW Grant Avenue is $42,000.00 (240 ft. x $175.00). Based on past City purchases of property for street right-of-way (ROW), property is assessed at $3.00 per square foot. The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately an additional 2,400 square feet of right-of-way along SW Grant Avenue. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $7,200.00 (10 feet x 240 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $49,200. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half street improvements to SW Johnson Street is $25,725.00 (147 ft. x $175.00). The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately 735 square feet of right-of-way. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $2,205.00 (5 feet x 147 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $27,930. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Because no new building or expansion is proposed, the applicant will be not required to pay TIF's. Therefore, no unmitigated impact can be found to exist with the construction of this parking lot. For this reason, the City is not recommending dedication of right-of-way and street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue frontage. The $27,930 of dedication and improvements on the SW Johnson Street apply directly to impacts on the local system. It can be argued for the local street system to function to serve all properties at buildout that streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. The applicant's proposal for improvements provides for the share of local street improvements needed to serve this development in conjunction with the standard improvements that are required of all other properties. In other words, the applicant is paying only for their portion or segment of the local street system. Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. Based on these findings, the City recommends that the Conditions of Approval requiring street right-of-way dedication and improvements along the SW Johnson Street frontage are roughly proportional to the impacts of the development. Although the City has not recommended requiring street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue street frontage, Conditions of Approval have been provided within this report that allow the applicant to provide these improvements, at their discretion, in order to give the site a finished appearance. The test of rough proportionality does not require a precise mathematical calculation or a "dollar for dolla�" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 6 OF 15 . Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 72 space overflow parking lot to serve religious assembly services for the Saint Anthony's church. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a religious assembly. Code Section 18.50 lists religious assembly as a conditionally permitted use in the R-4.5 Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.50 provides minimum lot size and setbacks standards. However, these standards are superseded by the Conditional Use Permit standards that are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Setback: Section 18.50 sets front, side and rear yard setback standards for new structures. No new structures have been proposed. However, as reviewed elsewhere within this report Section 18.100 does set standards for land use buffers where a parking lot adjoins a detached single-family residence. Environmental Performance: Section 18.90.020 states in part that each use or activity within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state, federal and state environme�tal regulations. The previous oil sales site is presently, partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of permits to redevelop this property. � Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. The applicant has a total of 387 feet of lineal frontage on SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. This frontage length would require a minimum of ten new street trees. The applicant has proposed to plant eight new Red Sunset Maple trees and to incorporate two existing Sequoia trees into the site plan for use as street trees. Based on their size at maturity, these trees are considered large specimens and comply with the spacing standard. If the arborist report finds that the two Sequoia trees that are to be incorporated into the site as street trees can be preserved as such, a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. . Screeninq and Bufferinq between land use fivpes: Section 18.100 sets minimum screening and buffering standards between land use types of varying intensities. Section 18.100 includes a Buffer Matrix Chart that requires a minimum of a 20 foot distance for parking lots with more than 25 parking spaces. At a minimum the buffer must contain the following: 2) a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and 3) shrubs of varying numbers based on their size at planting. Where a screening is also required one of the following must be provided: 1) a row of evergreen shrubs, 2) a five foot minimum height fence, or 3) an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. Alternatively, the Director can approve a modified buffer plan which provides the same level of screening with a different combination of screening and buffering elements. The buffering and screening criteria is not found to be applicable along the limits of the northweste�ty portion of the former oil sales site that abuts areas to be developed in the future. This standard would be applicable in the future if the church or other use was to later develop this remainder area. As provided in Section 18.100.070 buffering but not STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAfiING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 7 OF 15 screening standards are tound to be applicable along the SW Johnson Street and SW Grant - Avenue frontages. The screening and buffering standards are found to be applicable along the northwesterly and westeriy property lines because the site adjoins existing residential uses. The applicant has proposed to develop a row of parking spaces within a narrowed buffer area. A 20-foot buffer width is normally required between parking lots of 25 spaces or more and detached single-family residences. The applicant has shown a 10-foot buffer width. To utilize a lesser width the applicant must provide increased plantings or other screening and buffering materials that would provide the same level of screening and buffering. For a screening and buffering area along the northwesterly property line, the applicant has proposed 17 Westem Red Cedar trees spaced at 10 feet on center. The applicant has also proposed approximately 14 Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs. The neighbor's existing six-foot fence is also to be used as buffering. The applicant specified on the plans that the majority of the Cotoneaster plantings were five-gallon in size. Assuming that these plantings are all five-gallon plantings, a minimum of 25 are required to be provided for a buffer area of 2,300 square feet. Because the buffer width has been reduced in half, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide double the amount of shrub planting to a total of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. Due to their large size at maturity and tight ten-foot on center spacing, the proposed Westem Red Cedar trees exceed the minimum standard. For buffering and screening along the site's westerly property line the applicant has proposed a double row of 46, five gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings within a ten-foot buffer width. The applicant has also proposed eight RedTwig Dogwood shrubs planted in the westerly comer of the property. Because this buffer area is 1,200 square feet in area, a minimum of 24, five-gallon plantings are required where shrubs are used to meet the screening and buffering requirements. The 46 Cotoneaster plantings are approximately two times the minimum standard and are found to partially mitigate for the reduced buffer width. The applicant has not provided a row trees in this area. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees within the westerly buffer area. For screening along the property's street frontage on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street, the applicant has proposed a double row of 63, five-gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings and ten street trees, also within a ten-foot buffer width. The buffer area is approximately 3,470 square feet which requires a minimum of 35, five-gallon shrub plantings. The 63 proposed shrubs are nearly double the minimum planting requirements and appear to be sufficient for buffering purposes given that the street right-of-way will also buffer this site from adjoining uses. ScreeninQ Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has proposed a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs to screen the parking lot from view. The applicant STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97•0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 8 OF 15 . has also proposed to provide seven trees throughout the proposed parking lot of 72 parking spaces. The landscape islands that have been proposed are in excess of the three-foot minimum dimension. A curb has been proposed around the landscape planter islands to protect the proposed plantings. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a pubfic street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parkinq: Section 18.106.030 states that churches which use bench or pew seating within the congregation area are required to provide one parking space for every six feet of bench length. A two way drive aisle width of 24 feet is required to be maintained. Minimum parking space sizes of 8'8" by 18' for standard parking spaces and 8' by 15' for compact spaces are required to be provided. The church's Business Manager states that the congregation area currently has a total of 1,666 feet of pew seating. By dividing 1,666 by 6, a total of 278 spaces would be required to serve this facility if it were developed under current standards. The church is '- currently served by 147 parking spaces. The proposed overflow parking Iot would add 72 ��* spaces for a total of 219. This will still leave a deficit of 58 parking spaces. Because the church was not required to construct this parking lot during the review of previous church expansions and no building expansion is proposed, no specific minimum parking ratio has been found to apply to this application. The two-way drive aisle width and proposed parking space size comply with the minimum size standard. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that where up to 100 parking spaces are provided that a minimum of one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet shall be provided. The applicant has proposed two driveways for this purpose, in compliance with this standard. A driveway has been proposed on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street. Site Development Review - Approval Standards• Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.(A): (3) (Exterior Elevations), (5) (Privacy and Noise), (6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), (7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-00p7•SAIIYT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 9 OF 15 (8) (Open Space Dedication), (9) (Demarcation of Spaces), (12) (Public Transit), (17) (Signs) . and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. These sections are addressed elsewhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A): (2) (Tree Removal), (4) (Buffering and Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses, (10) Crime Prevention and Safety), (11) (Access and Circulation), (13) (Parking), (14) (Landscaping), (15) (Drainage), (16) (Provisions for the handicapped), and (18) (Underlying Provisions of the Zone) are addressed immediately below or elsewhere within this staff report: Tree Removal: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) states that building shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Building shall also not be located to in areas subject to slumping and sliding, with adequate provision for light, air, fire fighting capabilities and circulation. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. No buildings are being proposed so portions of this section are not applicable to this request. The applicant has proposed to preserve and incorporate two of the three existing trees onto the site plan for use as street trees. The applicant states that a third tree is to be removed because it is dead. An arborist report is recommended that examines the condition of the tree to be removed and the suitability of the other trees for incorporation into the site as street trees. If the trees are found to be suitable for preservation, the arborist report will also need to provide recommended protection measures during the construction process. Bufferinp, Screeninq and Compatibilitv Between Adioininq Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal provided specific screening materials that would be utilized where the parking lot adjoins existing detached single-family residences. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening and buffering plan that is in compliance with the standards of Section 18.100 which is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4j also states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen the parking lot through the use of a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrub plantings which adjoin the site's frontage on its SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street frontages. The applicant has not proposed to construct storage areas or a building which would require the screening of storage and rooftop equipment. Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.180.(A}(10) requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and stated that suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid- point at the north and south boundaries. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide type lighting is preferable. The applicant shall obtain approval of security lighting from the Police Department. STAFF REPGRT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 10 OF 15 The proposed landscaping may at some future time become a potential problem. The � parking lot should, at no point, become completely screened from the view of the traveling public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, (particularly solitary situations) but also manifests loitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens and/or emergency responders. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parkinq: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscapinq: Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The Conditional Use Permit invokes applicable standards of the Site Development Review as approval criteria. The landscape section requires that a minimum of 15% of the site be landscaped. The proposed use would be comprised of two separate parcels totaling 1.10 acres. A site of this size requires a minimum of 7,187 square feet of landscaping. The site plan appears to provide in excess of 8,000 square feet of landscaping but no precise calculation has been provided. The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. , Drainaqe: Section 18.120.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water �,-. runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. The Engineering Department has ,m recommended that additional downstream analysis be provided to demonstrate that no existing storm drainage facility deficiency exists. Provisions for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTFIONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING�OT PAGE 11 OF 15 The use, as proposed, _�mplies with all site development �.��dards set forth within the R-4.5 Zoning District and as modified by the Conditional Use Permit standards. • It appears that required public facilities can be made available to serve the site as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district can be met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. Two mature trees have been noted on this site that are proposed to be incorporated into the site as street trees. A third tree is proposed to be removed as the applicant states that this tree is dead. An arborist report has been required to investigate the condition of the tree that is stated to be dead and the suitability of the two Sequoia trees for incorporation into the site. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Specific Conditional Use Permit Standard for Reliqious Assemblv uses: Section 18.130.150(10) sets specific standards for lot size and setbacks for religious assembly uses. This section provides front, side rear and corner setback standards for new religious assembly structures. This section also requires a 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. No structure has been proposed, therefore, the setbacks standards are not applicable. Each of the two building site's are in excess of the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. Because the two sites would share common site improvements, the applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to incorporate two mature Sequoia trees into the landscape plan. The applicant has also proposed to remove one tree that appears to be dead. Because the only two healthy mature trees on these property's are to be incorporated into the site plan, no tree mitigation is required. The applicant did not provide an arborist report that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed and any special construction techniques that will be need to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. An arborist report shall be provided which addresses these issues. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional trees, then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 12 OF 15 , PUBLIC FACILITY CONC�riNS: The City has adopted Unified Sewerage Agency standards concerning Water �uality, Grading and Erosion Control requirements are addressed within this portion of the staff report. Provisions for water service to the site has been reviewed. Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) and 18.164.120 (Underground Utilities) sets forth standards for the aforementioned utilities these standards have also been reviewed below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. SW Johnson Street Southwest Johnson Street is classified as a local residential street, west of SW Grant Street, and therefore requires a 50-foot right-of-way (ROW). There is presently 40 feet of total ROW adjacent to this site {20 feet each side of centerline). The applicant should, as a p•:rt of developing this site, dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from centerline. The applicant's narrative indicates that they will provide this dedication. The roadway is paved, but does not meet current City standards for a local residential street. Because this site generates a significant amount of traffic from church services and related activities, and the street is substandard, the applicant should improve the � south side of Johnson Street as a part of this project. A half-street improvement is appropriate in this case. The applicant's narrative indicates that they are willing to improve the street. SW Grant Street Southwest Grant Street is classified as a minor collector street in this area, and requires a 60-foot ROW overall. At present, there is only 40 feet of ROW overall. In order to facilitate the widening of the street to meet City standards, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's narrative indicates they will provide this ROW dedication. This street is also paved, and is fully improved on the east side adjacent to the main church site. However, the west side is not improved to City standards. Although the applicant's narrative states that they are willing to improve the street, Staff believes that the impact from this parking lot development does not warrant improvement to the minor collector at this time. 18.164.030(A)(1)(c) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a non-remonstrance agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. If, however, the applicant would like to make the additional street improvements, they should obtain the necessary permit from the City Engineering Department. STAFF REPOFiT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 13 OF 15 WATER: . There are public water lines in both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Since this project is a parking lot, no additional public water line work is necessary. SANITARY SEWER: There will be no additional public sanitary sewer line work required. STORM DRAINAGE: The topography of this site slopes to the northwest. There is an existing 12-inch public storm sewer line adjacent to the east side of the roadway. This line carries street runoff toward Fanno Creek. The applicant submitted a downstream analysis, prepared by their engineer, which indicates that the 12-inch line is at or near capacity for carrying the 10- year storm event. It also indicates that the line has only 60% of the capacity required to convey the 100-year storm event. The City's public storm drainage system must be designed to convey a 25-year storm event, as required by USA's Design and Construction Standards. It is not clear from the applicant's materials, whether or not the existing system can adequately convey the additional runoff from this site under 25-year event conditions. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit additional information to the Engineering Department with regard to downstream conditions. If there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the applicant can either upsize that system, or provide on-site detention. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant has indicated that they will provide a water quality facility near the northeast corner of the site. The preliminary calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer indicate the pond will need to be approximately 684 cubic feet. The applicant's site plan will need to accommodate that pond size. The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFIOW PARKING LOT PAGE 74 OF/5 . GRADING AND EROSIOiv CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&� 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prio�to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking lot. The Police Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid-point at the north and south boundary. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide type lighting is our preference. The proposed landscaping may at some future time become a potential problem. The parking lot should at no point become completely screened from the view of the traveling public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, particularly solitary situations but also manifests loitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens and/or emergency responders. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been received. GG��"� October 6 1997 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE iate Planner � � October 6. 1997 APPROV D BY: Richard Bewers orff DATE Planning Manag�r i:�curpin�rnarkr�cup97-07.dec STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICEF CUP 97-00p7•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PAAKING LOT PAGE 15 OF 15 , EX 12' CANG STORPt BEtNER ' r�� ADDITIONAL ROW E7c FiRE N70RANT ��Q LpGAT10N Of OPI—SITE WAT R ' +� EX i" WATER �iNE � OUAl.1T7 TREATI"�EN7 HAS1N � �� O EXI57ING ROt�I _ � � PROPOSEO ROW _ � _ _ _ — � 10' �0' � CH AT I.OW POINT IN � pARKING LOT — — � � SW JOI--INSON � — .— — — - — — STREET— � pRpr DRAIN LiNE � G LO � G C G C ' �J � � G � I G � \ G � El( INV�OUS � � G � \ G I � INV OUT•�il il Q G 1 � C RiM�1�3.EC G Jr C I� � G I _TAX LOt ti00 G r. C W N c ��y � > Q L •'�* EXISTiNG PLA7 F�ELDS I � � � ` f! w I� � gE�uR�T,- C � G > I J, Q ' LI L Q C G � �- I (7 c �� ` z — - - � o� - -� r Q �I E-- i � �� 1 � I(� u- � � O � � l s; � � � I � l r.�x t,or i�oo I c �� C� j I f I � � � � �.' � < < � � � � � � � � � I� , v —� - - - - ► II� I 11 I ��T� p�� CASE NC�. � St. Anthony's Overflow Parking Lot ' E�(NIBIT MAP CUP 97•0007 • � Y �I ��````�I O li Sy�C I � � I I i � I I W I I , � � , � I O I y2N L i p � i � i �� I � ', O��s � �!I Q �OF A� �� i W 5 � � � •— , � j � . s oo,� o T � ; ,� s,a <-- U B!E �� i li - ' P � a. �� q� �, � ti�T �� ,� � �� ' �- . � �-- �� s�. �, � �9 �� ._ �� U � � �� ; � , � ; ViciniriMau N ; CUP 97-0007 ' ' ' S�Anihony's �� O�erflow Parking lot � � r • • � LEGEND � � t U a ��E �J EXISTING COi1'TOUR + m �!] i�� _ �O _ 1 a e ��l�Fc@ �--�—� E�IISTWG FENCE � � , � i r � �. HANDICAPPED PARHING SPACE � � � W U C COMPACT PARHING SPACE 9w JONNSON STREE7 e+ LIGHT POLE ——-� PROPERTY LINE — � � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r�orosw —�� CENTER LINE �ARKING f �V�� DI PROP05ED DRAIN INLET � � � � � I I j flC18TING PLAY fIELDS �ISTING I ❑ DI EXISTING DRAIN INLET � e��-��T e`"Qp�- o Q MN EXISTING MANHOLE _ ` _ _ � �� Q 'S'��, Q r � f,� EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT � � � ��L� r � - - - - DRAIN I.INE rROPtxn- NFr.o iN � � �m � u DEVERLOrP1ENT FUTURE � � t PROPOSED CURB � rx�srirw d x o — — — — � — — LOT 'C' PAWI�TL+ 78L� 3 �Uy 00 GO^iPACT Q) µ.� F+ � pt18TINC. 4 SPAGEB r � O PARICING UG� �e�, I w Ss*N� ��'�� ,.� ,D� U 4 � � - - - - - - - - � I O �� 8a, , � � i � �� j W F � ' � � � � o z � DCISTING PARKING LOT WITN �� 4 � 1 4i STANDARD SPAGES AND � � �p � f 2 1�1ANDIGAP 6PAGC5 x 3 — _ _ _ _ _ � � 9W McKENZIE 6TREET Z > � — — — � A �n i y�� I y` y�\' y� y�+ � r �'� � DCIBTING � �O�� I1 Ig `Ov I : IV �7 I��l y Z 'd � � LOT 'B' PARKING LOT irt O �"'�""' � � 57ANDARD � i.OT STANDAR;J COf"f*'ACT 4-IG � E �. � aPAGES� �'F A 26 0 2 '"T'"T'�+' �`.� SITE n $ 53 0 0 P�.�1N � �+c�,�we � .,,,,,,�oo�,,,�a C 38 O 0 a� � D o 28 D 8-15-97 TOTAL 117 28 2 147 1 .�,.,..� �� EX 12" GONG STORM SEWER v� �� U o �� ' U 1 ��* V ADDITIONAL ROW w �X FIR� N1'DRANT f � TD BE D�DIGAT�D � LOGATION OF ON-SITE WATER � � EX 6" WAT�R LINE OUALITY TREATI"fFNT BASIN 1 JJ �X15TING ROW � l�� PRO°OS�D ROW — — — — — � � — — — — — — — — — — - GB AT LOW POINT IN �� 2O� PARKING LOT � - - — — �� — — — _ — — � — �g �J SW JO�-INSON STrZ��T ��o�� --w � fi'ROPL DRAIN LINE G � SLOPED AT 1X w q c I G � c c cG � ' � �� o I G � \ G 1 1 � � FX INV 161 15 ►�i � j \ c � � � C INV O'JT.161.61 G ' � G �t � RIM�i63.B0 U 1 � G C ; I � � �� O TAX LOT 1600 C � . G � j �� G ,,��' � � Z 3�� U �' G � 1 �X15TING PLAY FIELDS SECURITY I C � C � �� '' LIG TI G G ' C ( Q � � O � o�� c � � � 1� E� � -�1 I z iI� z _ � PARKING BOUNDARY LINE ON SAI"i� G �� C � � � � � SEAR I NG A5 � TD NORT�-I `i C 'tn�(O G � r R I I E'"' r � � I .� , � b � C � � � I �' � �� W x I � e��o I G � 1 � 1 � � � oa � F G ( ,.ti�! ,�� I f C� O TAX LOT t700 � G - ' j j f j � z LAYOUT I G � � � PLAN 1 ccccciccccc � ; � ' �� + l 8-15-97 � - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - '� � I 1 2 � � U ro ��i� U o ��!�]�� ' - - - - - - - - � I _ d e ��.lili3 � O�Pi�'� 1 � �� a�1� � �a G� ti F U � � RF�U I RE� PARKI NG: 0 SPAGES w p�„ z 15 RED SUNSET RED MAPLE EXISTING PAQKING: 117 STANDARD U _. 28 COMPAGT _ __ ---- 2 .G. _-- _-_ -- --- - --- - - 4 VAR REDTWIG DOGWOOD I47 TOTAL 5 PARNEY COTONEASTER PROPOSED PARKING� �585G01"1PAGT 17 WEST�RN RED CEDAR � 72 TOTAL � TOTAL PARKING� 131 STANDARD �a� {4a% ALLOI�vABL� 86 COMPACT(38%) �'�'r I �-40GAN CEDAR GOMPAG�) '7 �}.G, d'"p�� EXISTING SOLID FENCE AT NEIG►a-1BOR 224 TOTAL ACT ION: ►,�r q ADD 14 STANDARD SPAG�S 58 j1"' 0 � GOI`�IPAGT SPAG�S IN T+�E LOT � � 63 PARN�Y GOTONEASTER AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER � o 5 GAL ! OF SW JOI-�INSaN STREET AND SW GRANT AVENUE x EX PONDER05A PINE � U TO REMAIN STRIPE AND LABEL 5 1-IANDIGAP SPACES IN LOT 'D' � r—, ►-.a 0 - - - - - - - - - - r"" — — � � l�i e u.� �a r 4� i ri g � j Lot �ar�dscaping . �, � REQUIRED PE�II"'ETER: 10' SUFFER FROI`1 Z 30' SIG�ITING 1 � � DISTANGE - TYP r � � l ` 5?RE�T TRE�S: q TREES GGTONEASTE?Z DAMMERI � '� � 1 (20'-40' OC) Z TYP ' �� INTERIOR TRE�S: 70 SPACES / 7 s 10 TREES � S VAR R�DTWIG DOGWOOD �+ (1 TR�E PER � f 7 SPAG=S) Z b - - - - - - - - - � e�o 46 PARNEY GOTONEASTER U' E" 5 GAL PLANTING � PLAN 8-15-97 3 ..�.... \ g� Ji� \�\� �+ r-\ : ��° � � l . `� � � � �5��— 0P• ��'; f _ ----�— _�� o �` � �—- � � ` `�N �' � b� x�� C �C1 d o r ,ti � � r-- . �T�'b .- _ _ _,� I + -� x x ,`'Z�- � �� —� ° + 5��, o 1--�� , o� — f,u�� ; �� / � ��x � / x 'r _ � � � _- I� I , l � , . � x � �� —_' " � � --� � G• x X� � �v r � \ \ '" � � t ��,,� f°, i {-� � _J � ---� ► � dl �� i ' �� __ I i � � � � , D — �i � �' � ' � � o �' , a � � � � � I I ' x�� 160 �� , p I�---- \ 0 I �fi I I ��I � t i I �� ,�?°6°i r`} ---�—�� -a.- � � �rd�' � � � � � J \ J o`'+ �1 � �' — \ �X= �`r' O �6 � I_ l�� O 6a� 1 � 1 0� l..... ....:.�.�...:.........:.:............ . . . ----� �— ` � .�.� �3 I I I '� °1:::::::':.':::�.::.:;::;�.:;::�::.;:.,'::�`::;�.:;�:.:;�::::.:.:::.:::.: .... o C�I / � � } �`,� � I �..:.....�.:.::`:.....�...::...:.:..�...........;:.....�`. � . II - - a ' ,,�- � � � .�. � i � d � {� � 9 I � . � � \ o I � `2 t� �.'�`�t`;'l�•`:'�••.�:�;.•�i•::''':�•:�;:�•:•`:':•:;:':••�`:•,.::•:�•:•:'�'•.:••�:��..•�:�:�:',`�:. I ` � x � �y� ``�"1 � �t1`?�` \ i � 4) o I �,o �' \ \ \ �69 ' \ 5. :'�:':'.;:�:�i.'``.:::�':�.`` � � ?� . . � , �_ —� o �� . � � ::..:�.....:.:.......:....:............:�...... ... a �� x �t:::..::....:;��...::��.�.;::::�:�:��:�:�::;�..:�...�.::::. : � �` . — — _. ., Ti:�:�.`;�:::��::`�;;;::.::�;,,�..:.:;..:,::�.:,::�::..:,.:.: � �\ Q�a I �� 1 _ ��o ��" I --�� :.,.:.�.:....::...::::. �...::�. � �:::�::.�.: �..:. �... � .. , � I � � —� QP � �' �.':i....:;;,:;i`.;;,;':,;::.�.,.;:...,�.:.:.:�....�.�..�::.:,::��.,::�:::. � � / � ` ... .:..,...:�•.... ��\ � / �:::,�::::::�.: .�;::�:;�:�:��::::::�:�:;�:::;::,:::�:.:: � � - � � ` ....:..: . .. . ,�:.::. �. �""� � �-� _ ��:��:�.:.::.:.:.:.::.�:��. I i.".. . ��......�...: � � �� ' .� � �10 �`!S � � �� I _O 2 =V' ❑ 1 Q -��„ � �, V � " – `�` _ _ ,�� —— QP x � � �� p . � O 1 • � / i �-� / \ ` Z x ` -- -� - �-�� -�-`�r� , 4- ` ., o�+1 _J � p � � �- I __ �. x � � I � � � � I 3 �5 I � G• � �gp x / —� 1_� x Q G, �. o I XI 3 � � � — 1 � �e / �____ L/ r I p q � ' ,� �� / 5 �°4 � � � x—–_- �------� x _ X � _�r � ' � _ - X � (l � ' ` J�O V � � '18 __ � QP . = v _ x� •R ` � a xl ` �p �h,�a\� f ?P'J � i Q�-��O� �o�. ��, �`•\' - � aj1 . �� _ �.o �e / ,= �. �'�_ --- .to�1 l ��o ��p �, \9�� O+ � �9 ` � ��; �, � n 1 .�: l� / ,. \s' , �� ' � � � �d C•E•C•C A C GI N Z �"".., Aeeociate� ,� � z SAINT ANTH�NY CATHOLIC CHURCH ��o � � � Tigard Oregon `��'�'j� ,_,`''"""a,- � � .2 C�! b, r,,;�: 3 �:-�' `��z� �I I � I 1 � . --�,__. / 1 I —� �� -�-� 1 ��\��_4� 7 �f l � I I CITY OF TIGARD Comrnuru:ty Development ,$hapine�l Better Community CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER OCTOBER 13,1997-7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0007 LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lot 01600 and 01700. PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 72 space overflow parking lot. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, 1-5 Dwelling Units Per Acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religious assembly and uses related to religious assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 10/13/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:�pattylrnasters�agendho.mst i CITY OF TIGARO HEARING'S OFFICER OCTOBER 13, 1997 - 7:00 P.M. TOWN HALL TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 �/ �nyone wish�ng to speAk on An AgendA item should sign an the Appropr�Ate sign-in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171 , Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above if you are requesting such services. (OVER FOR HEARING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 10/13/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:lpatty�masters�agendho.mst i � � From: "Jim Wolf' <27047@ci.tigard.or.us> Organization: City of Tigard To: markr@ci.tigard.or.us Date sent: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 16:16:43 PST Subject: Re: St. Anthony's Priority: normal Mark...Well, I attend services there weekly..and I can tell you that they usually have at least 6/8 to a full house. Obviously some earlier services (the 7:00 am Sunday service) have a lighter turnout (1/2 full) but St. A's is a mega parish with a very big draw. I might suggest you call Mary Ellen in the church office and ask her what the capacity of the church is. I suspect it must be about 600-700 (?) They presently have a Saturday p.m. service and 3 services on Sunday. I hope this info helps. Jim Jim Wolf Community Services Officer Tigard Police Department Mark Roberts -- 1 -- Thu, 25 Sep 1997 17:00:38 � From: "Brian Rager" <TIG3/BRIAN> Organization: City of Tigard To: jimd Date sent: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 07:59:09 PST Subject: Re: St Anthony's TIF's Copies to: MarkR, Dick, Jill I concur with you, Jim. The TIF tax seems to only apply when a building, or building expansion, is proposed. I would not charge a TIF for the church. > From: "James Duckett" <TIG3/JIMD> > Organization: City of Tigard > To: markr@ci.tigard.or.us > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 07:54:07 PST > Subject: Re: St Anthony's TIF's > Reply-to: jimd > Cc: Jill, Brian, Dick > Mark, > > According to Washington County Code 3.17.040(A), "a traffic impact > tax is imposed on all development in the county, including > cities...". According to WCC 3.17.030(N), "'development' means any > man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate which has the > effect of generating additional weekday or weekend trips as > determined in a manner set forth in sections 3.17.050(A) or > 3.17.050(B) whichever is applicable". > > Since trip generation for a church is based on the square footage of > the building and not the number of parking stalls, I do not believe a > traffic impact fee is in order. > > Hope this helps, > JimD > > > > From: "Mark Roberts" <TIG3/MARKR> Mark Roberts -- 1 -- Thu, 25 Sep 1997 08:57:08 I "'� � � � > > Organization: City of Tigard > > To: Jill, JimD > > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:00:03 PST > > Subject: St Anthony's TIF's > > Reply-to: markr@ci.tigard.or.us > > Cc: Brian, Dick > > > Hello - I'm working on a Rough Proportionality Analysis for an > > overflow parking lot for St Anthony's and I'm trying to figure out > > what the City would charge for TIF's. I don't see much in the way of > > trip rates in the TIF Ordinance or relevant traffic studies in the > > ITE Manual. » > > The church has proposed to build 72 parking spaces. The site > > has frontage on both Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. Because > > Johnson Street is a Local Street, improvements to this type of street > > haven't previously been included in the Rough Proportionality > > equation. » > > During the preapplication conference we assumed that we could require > > half-street improvements on Minor Collector, Grant Avenue, because > > the church wouldn't be likely to build these spaces if they weren't > > needed ie: the size of main church congregational area. However, no > > building expansion is proposed. What would the City charge for > > TI F's? » > Jim Duckett > X349 > Mark Roberts -- 2 -- Thu, 25 Sep 1997 08:57:08 1 :�1 CITY OF TIOARD Corrtmunery Devtlopment Sfrapircy:i Better Conununit� PUBLIC NEARIHG NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. OCTOBER 13, 1997 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD ClVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL � BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSiDER THE FOILOWiNG APPLICATION: � FILE NO: CONDITIONAi USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0007 FiLE TITLE: ST.ANTNONIf'S 011ERFi0W PARKING LOT APPLlCANT: St. Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland Attn: Leslie Sieg 9905 SW McKenzie Street 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: SunsE� Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard PO Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 REDUEST > A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102B8, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. The site �� located at the southeast comer of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue in the �ity of Tigard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.10C, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 Zoning District is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 Zoning District also permits religious assembly an� i�ses related to religious assembly. THE PUBLIC ;�EARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF Cl��PTER "8.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADQPTED BY THE TIGARD C1TY �OUNCIL AND AVA�LABLE AT CITY HALL. OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY 1/uli..L ALSO ENOEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR C�UALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED B!LlNGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503} 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TQ MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. i.UP 37-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW?ARKING lOT PRCPOSdLRECUEST FOR COMMEN7S ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT � ,TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO. ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBUC HEARING. AT THE PUB�IC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CiTY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUB�IC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRiTTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAlN ADDITIONAL INFORMATiON, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPtiCATiON AFTER SEPTEMBER 22. 1997, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GFIANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY RECIUEST THAT THE REC�FtD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ON�Y AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REC�UEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REDUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TD THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETrER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CIOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REG�UEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CFiITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WH1CH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED F1LE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOFi TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7} DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS, PLANNING DIVISION AT (503} 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREG�N 97223. a \ N � � 3 � a N < / W � �,.o � UB1E . P ti, ` � ti •T �.� CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONYS OVERFIOW PAfiKING LOT PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMEVTS , � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVEp PLANNING Community Development S6iaping�l.Better Community DATE: September 9,1991 SEP 12 1997 1 T0: lohn Roy,Property Manager GjYOFT�G�D FROM: Ci of Ti ard Plannin Divis n STAFF CONTACT: MarK Roberts[x31T1 Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[50316841291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP191-000] ➢ ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Q A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Located at the southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religeous assembly and uses related to religeous assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, W E NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday-September 19,1997 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You ere uneble t0 reSpODd bY tl1e abOVe date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (P(ease provide tFie fo!lowin8 inforniationJ Name of Person[sl Commendng: Phone Numher[sl: CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS ti�� ' � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ��fl oF r��aRo � RECENEO PLANNING CommuniryY�evelopment S�ping s'1 Better Community DATE: Seutemder 9,1997 SEP 1 2 1997 C{YY OF TIGARD T0: Dauid Scot�Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Diuision STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts[x31T] Phone:[5031639�171 fax:[50316847291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP191-000T ➢ ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Q A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Located at the southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religeous assembly and uses related to religeous assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday-September 19,1991 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I�ou are unable to respond by the abo�e date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. .- Written comments provided below: ,,•=�C�(Pf//�` � T7ur�'i i, � Cr � � i^a �� d l'�vf/ G Ir'�w/� � D� "' / l � .� _�/11 !'r/c�/� � Y� ,(� Y �� ri �s v� /L,, '� �% T�rr� � ✓ � (Plea.se provirfe tFie fo!lazuing information�Name of Person[sl Commentlng: , • � � !�T-. PhoneNumber[sl: -- =�> CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD � RECENED PLANNING Cammunity'DeveCoprr�ent SFcaping A Better Community SEP 19 1997 DATE: September 9,1991 CITYOFTIQARD T0: Tigard Police Departmeni Interim Crime Preuentlon Officer FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts[x3111 Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[50316841297 RE: CONDITIOHAL USE PERMIT[CUP197-0001 ➢ ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARNING LOT Q A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. L�CATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Located at the southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZQNE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religeous assembly and uses related to religeous assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FI'IIlBy-September 19,1997 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You ere u118b1e t0 reSp011d bY t11C abOVe date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK TNE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: c�,��5'Cn.d. �,�k�nq wot�ld �`x �o ��, tp�dol.� 3 "Srra��w" \;�n},vg �tahdwid9, AS oppa�vd -'b ow� �r�fqe I�oh�v,v� Sc�(Q - ��Ced� �,ca+Yw�'� nwy �e, a� 1ec��t�ac� �(��ra�l.,� he'�ed, w�Nn o��o�a� �:x�le5 lh�-Q��'r oh �IaP(� av�d� �ul�n ba,nAar , � ��ti��r an �Yw! S�cw�d �N. Gp�c.�J\�teG� ho drnalh -a'�nf� r�w�.,t�ev�x�n e6&�c�e�rr.� �! �- �yG� o�C \:o� �c� dcv��.�n. •' �e'tal-r\o�1��vt, � �IQ�• \.��k�v�c� '�5 ow pY��c�e�ncx . , '��(o�p5td "�o.�.a��n '� aw,� ol�C �e� �v�t.,I� k�c�* �vt�D+ra.- o� �po�ev�a�� (ab4xr. �� Qo,rk� \o-E staa� Pt K, ��h� �xc,�:� ca+..��c� �eane.d" �ro+�n �v+� J�aa 6F �(�Je\\�� ,p�io��c,. Na�.,rn�. �'�ghfi a�ovn�► a�w ycvrld hot (P(ease provufe tFie fo!lowing inforniation�Name of Person[sl Commenting: (��M V,p�� Ct�tw.Q�(a!• �c�t��w� o�� Phone Number[sl: �,�-�� -� '�10 CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS � �'�CeA� �hcnSl, �pe'�• CAMQ�R,�t ,..�f�i.r�h � �o� CW� on�y �t�M� � 2(5 �( " o\1F�t ~ 5��5� �'� 0��6��,�,aArF{S�Pi 10�'Ce�►h � � �g� (�o.(�C��A 5 � `o�'an�ltA� �,t�►� � vrrSVSQRdt�� C.�t�,on5 G� 'R�'"�g J �s�o,�,a,�w,t a�n� Q � � (�ona10(9• , . ; � � ' , MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 30, 1997 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer � RE: CUP 97-0007, St. Anthony's Overflow Parking Lot Description: This request is to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. The site is located at 9870 SW Johnson Street, which is at the southwest corner of SW Grant Street and SW Johnson Street (WCTM 2S1 02BB, Tax Lots 1600 and 1700). Findings: 1. Streets: This site lies adjacent to both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. SW Johnson Street SW Johnson Street is classified as a local residential street, west of SW Grant Street, and therefore requires a 50-foot right-of-way (ROV1�. There is presently 40 feet of total ROW adjacent to this site (20 feet each side of centerline). The applicant should, as a part of developing this site, dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from centerline. The applicant's narrative indicates that they will provide this dedication. The roadway is paved, but does not meet current City standards for a local residential street. Because this site generates a significant amount of traffic from church services and related activities, and the street is substandard, the applicant should improve the south side of Johnson Street as a part of this project. A half-street improvement is appropriate in this case. The applicant's narrative indicates that they are willing to improve the street. SW Grant Street SW Grant Street is classified as a minor collector street in this area, and requires a 60-foot ROW overall. At present, there is only 40 feet of ROW ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 1 overall. In order to facilitate the widening of the street to meet City standards, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's narrative indicates they will provide this ROW dedication. This street is also paved, and is fully improved on the east side adjacent to the main church site. However, the west side is not improved to City standards. Although the applicanYs narrative states that they are willing to improve the street, Staff believes that the impact from this parking lot development does not warrant improvement to the minor collector at this time. 18.164.030(A)(1)(c) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a non-remonstrance agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. If, however, the applicant would like to make the additional street improvements, they should obtain the necessary permit from the City Engineering Department. 2. Water: There are public water lines in both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Since this project is a parking lot, no additional public water line work is necessary. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There will be no additional public sanitary sewer line work required. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site slopes to the northwest. There is an existing 12-inch public storm sewer line adjacent to the east side of the roadway. This line carries street runoff toward Fanno Creek. The applicant submitted a downstream analysis, prepared by their engineer, which indicates that the 12-inch line is at or near capacity for carrying the 10- year storm event. It also indicates that the line has only 60% of the capacity required to convey the 100-year storm event. The City's public ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 2 , -..�•_Ar _. _ _ _ storm drainage system must be designed to convey a 25-year storm event, as required by USA's Design and Construction Standards. It is not clear from the applicant's materials, whether or not the existing system can adequately convey the additional runoff from this site under 25-year event conditions. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit additional information to the Engineering Department with regard to downstream conditions. If there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the applicant can either upsize that system, or provide on-site detention. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surFaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant has indicated that they will provide a water quality facility near the northeast corner of the site. The preliminary calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer indicate the pond will need to be approximately 684 cubic feet. The applicant's site plan will need to accommodate that pond size. The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 3 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: lVote: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. . 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Johnson Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 4 4. If the applicant elects to dedicate additional right-of-way to the Public along the frontage of SW Grant Street to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline, the description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Johnson Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. curb and gutter d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk f. street striping g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer h. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) i. street signs (if applicable) j. driveway apron (if applicable) k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Johnson Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 6. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Grant Street. 7. If the applicant chooses to make half-street improvements to SW Grant Street, they should include that work as a part of the public improvement plans and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 8. Profiles of SW Johnson Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City (Brian Rager), of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 5 drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. 10. If the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility. 11. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave a proposed development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or dwellings, the downstream stormwater system shall be enlarged to relieve the identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an on-site detention facility. 12. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 13. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the site permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING AND/OR SITE INSPECTION: 15. Prior to final site inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 16. Prior to a final site inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as- built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 6 diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 17. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. (STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311). i:\eng�brian r\comments\cup97-07.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 97-0007 St. Anthony's Overflow Lot PAGE 7 . _ � AFFIDAVIT OF MAIIlNG ��,oFnaARo ' cv��v�h�orr��lop,�u . S�apiagil`BetterCommurttty SZ��o�'��O.N ) County of`Washircgton )ss. City of 7'sgasd ) I, P'triCi�L Wllst�l'd, being flrst duly swom/affinn, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the ity of Tigard, Washington Caunty, Oregon. That I served MO?ICE Of(AMENDED ❑) PUBUC NEARIN6 FeR: � ` I �J � 1.....+.,.,..rr, � Ye1N nc�, {C�t�IwNrIMr y[My�} ❑/ City of Tigard Planning Directo� Q' Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission �J Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF(AMENDED ❑� DECISION FOS: cs�......,.�...�., ❑ City of Tigard Planning Directo� ❑ That I served MOTI�E OF (AMENDED 0) FiNAL ORDER FeR: cs.u......,...�n {�t�wrNrhb Mi O�Mrr} � City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer 0 Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTUEB MOTICE OF �� A copy of the POB�g BEARIN6 MOTICE/MOi10E OF DECISIOM/MOTICE Of FiMAI OBDES/ATHEB!1011e�{Sl of which is attached. marked Exhibit "A" was mailed to each a rson(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), metic�d Ddti6 n the ��i�`t a of ;�' � 1991, and deposited in the United States Mail on the o� day o� 1991,postage prepaid. , l � u�.� F� [P�rsa at Prep r� dcel Subscribed and sworNaffirmed before me on the day of � � � , 1�� OFFICIAL SEAL _ DIANE M JELDERKS ��]n NOTARY PUBLIC�OREGON i�� ' COMMISSION NO.Oa6t42 NOTARY POBLlC OF 60M MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, i999 IY�y Cammiss�on E�irr.x � RLE IMFO: � � eas�uat �!L �1 —C�C�G% e� � / G�f' ,� �'�T"°/��r��i�,. £X.�iBIT A �`._. CITY OF TIGARD � Commuttir�Dc2�elopment SFiaping�1 Bette�Communi ty � PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1997 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONQL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-000] FILE TITLE: ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portiand Attn: Leslie Sieg 9905 SW McKenzie Street 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 _ OWNER: Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard PO Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 RE�UEST ➢ A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. The site is located at the southeast comer of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue in the City of Tigard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 Zoning District is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 Zoning District also permits religious assembly and uses related to religious assembly. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF} NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 9�-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT Vl TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO: ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE - HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFOAMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER SEPTEMBER 22, 1997, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REC�UEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25fi) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REC�UEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS, PLANNING DIVISION AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. 0 \ N � � � > < m w S �r o < UB)E P � ` ti r �+ CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONV'S OVERFLOW PARKING l0T PROPOSAUREQUEST FOF COMMENTS C UP ��"_ �j�'�')� �T. RIUTl�D/��S P�Cti�f�j. � � �X��l1V 5�Of�l �Prij. 1 0�' Z � � / 2S1026B-01400 2S102BA-02100 �I��T B BOGDEN,ROBERT W AND BORSCH,LUCILLE HUGHES AND BARBARAJ JOSEPH ANTHONY '9940 SW JOHNSON STREET 9935 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S1026A-02700 2S1026B-00804 CORCORAN-DUDLEY,ELAINE CUMMINS,BRIAN S 9823 SW JOHNSON ST 12430 SW BROOKSIDE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102BA-02102 251026A-02300 ENGH,KENNETH A/SHELLEY L ENRIGHT,BRENDAN 9955 SW JOHNSON STREET 21028 HWY 99E NE TIGARD,OR 97223 AURORA,OR 97002 2S1026B-07700 2S102BB-00805 HARRIS OIL COMPANY HOLLAND,CARL B&SUSAN D c/o SUNSET FUEL COMPANY 12460 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 2944 SE POWELL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S102BA-02200 2S102BB-01201 JANSEN,KENNETH C JANSEN,STEVEN J& KAREN VICKJANSEN,PAMELA L 9975 SW JOHNSON 20633 SW ELK HORN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 25102BA-02800 2S102BA-02900 JEFFRIES-BOWMAN,ANDREA M JOHNSTON,DOROTHY E 9801 SW JOHNSON 9789 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-02101 2S10288-00803 JONES,MATTHEW Q KARI,JON A AND BECKY J PENCE,ANNA R 12400 SW BROOKSIDE ST 9945 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102B6-01302 2S1028B-01200 KRAMIEN,STANLEY R AND DEBRA L LEARY,DAVID L AND 10000 SW JOHNSON ST KATHLEEN J TIGARD,OR 97223 10020 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1026A-02600 2S102B6-00800 LOGAN,MARTA R MCVICAR,BARBARA W&KRISTIN A 12394 SW GRANT AVE c/o MISTLER,TERRY&LINDA TIGARD,OR 97223 10040 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-02103 WICKS,RONALD GAYLE& GATION,KAY E TRUSTEES 9965 SW JOHNSON STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 ��P 9�-_�a� � �,-�N y s �� o,- �x,�,�s��v �� 2 0� Z� 2S102BB-01900 2S10286-01301 MOORE,ROBERT C TRUSTEE MURRAY,JAMES A/MOLLY 8 MOORE,ELIZABETH R TRUSTEE RYAN,MICHAEL 'PO BOX 23098 9982 SW JOHNSON ST TIGAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-01800 2S102BA-01600 POOLE,ANNE M AND PORTLAND GENERAL E C NUKK,KARIN COMPANY 16449 DEARBORN ST 121 S N ST SEPULVEDA,CA 91343 ND,OR 97204 2S102BA-01601 2S102B8-01802 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RATKAI,KATALIN COMPANY 6222 SW EDGEWOOD 121 SW SALMON ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S102BB-01600 2S102BD-00100 ROMAN CATHO�IC ARCHBISHOP OF ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHB F PORTLAND IN OREGON PORTLAND IN O 2838 E BURNSIDE 2838 E DE PORTLAND,OR 97214 LAND,OR 97214 2S102B6-01300 2S102B8-01500 SHEARER,EMMETT J/ELISE C SIMELE,PAUL E& 9980 SW JOHNSON NGUYEN,HANH T TIGARD,OR 97223 9910 SW JOHNSON STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 251026A-03000 2S102BB-00833 SINGH,MAIHEN AND ARUNA SMITH,STEPHEN A&CHRISTINE D 9777 SW JOHNSON 10050 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1D2BA-02500 2S1028B-01800 STROUM,DONALD M&ANDREA J VANRIETTE,THERESA L 12380 SW GRANT AVE BEMIS,KEITH A TIGARD,OR 97223 12535 5W GRANT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102B6-01801 251026A-01900 VELKE,JOHN A III&DENI S WAGNER,EDWARD AND MARIE G 14043 S CAUFIELD RD TRUSTEES OREGON CITY,OR 97045 9885 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2510266-01202 2S7026A-02000 WATKINS,CHRIS L&ROBIN L WICKS,RONALD GAYLE 10010 SW JOHNSON 12345 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 HARRIS OIL COMPANY LESLIE SIEG c/o SUNSET FUEL COMPANY ST. ANTHONY PARISH PO BOX 42287 9905 SW MCKENZIE STREET PORTLAND OR 97242 TIGARD OR 97223 � � , , . � AFFIDAYIT OF MAIIlNG CTTY O/TiOARD _ Cowmnmcy�pew(upeneeet S�Rg il�Bstter Commumry r TA'I�E O�F O�CON ) County of'WasFeirrgton )ss. City of?"sgard ) I, PeQ1C��L IDDS��(d, being first duiy swom/affirm, on oath depase and say that I am an Administrative Specia(ist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. ❑ That I se�ved NOTICE OF(AMENDED �� PUBLIC NEANIM6 Fo� cr+.........�y �If�N f.�,i�OU (CMit#swl�r MU�} 0 City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer � Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council 1 �: That I served MOTICE Of (AMENDED 0) DECtS10M F�a is.�rs.nu...�.r�► G City of Tigard Planning Directar That I served NOT'IC�OF (AMENDED L�� FINAL ORDEB F�s: �a........�..�r.► {cf�c��wrNrf�o1 ra ON��} � / City of Tigard Planning Director 4Y Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council �� That I served OTHEB KOTICE OF Fp� A capy of the posuc e�su�s Honc�onef af��sioruHan�f oF�uu oso�a�Nonc�s� of wi,ich is attact�ed. ma�iced Exhibit "A", w s ailed to e��n�m� person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attacfied list(s), me1tE� D�ti� the a of � f�� Y 1997, and deposited in the United States Mail on �he � 5� day of �-��t� 1991,postage prepaid. ,�; � tPer'saQ pe _ l , Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the_�_day of � U � , �g�? OFFICIAL SEAL � � /�� D .p t� IANE M JELDERKS �� '� �� NOTARY PUBLIC�OREGON NQTIWY pYBUe�If Oa ON COMMISSION NO Oa6t42 ,..�t MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMf3ER 0�, �999 �GamIDi.�1O�� RtE lMf�: u _ e�st e� �C(, 9�—��- eua�,�, �" � � ? � ,� (�- � � EXHIBIT A 120 DAYS = 2/26/97 CITY OF TIGARD _ Camrnunic�Developmenr , SFiaping�l Better Community � CITY OF TIGARD �YUashington County, Oregan NOTICE OF FlNAL ORDER a BY TNE NEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0007 Case Name(s): ST.AHTNONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Name of �wner: Roman Catholic Archbishoq of Portland In Oreqon Name of Applicant: St. Anthonv's Parish Attention: Leslie Sieq Address of Applicant: 9905 SW McKenzie Street City: Tiqard State: Oreqon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: 9870 SW Johnson Street City: Tipard State: OreQOn Zip: 97223 Tax Map(s)/Lot No(s).:WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Reuuest—➢A request to develop a 72 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. lAIIC: R-4.5; Residential, 4.5 units per acre. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. ACtl011: —> � Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions 0 Denial NOtiCe: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance � Affected governmental agencies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator O The applicant and owner(s) Fnal Decision: � THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 19,1991 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. TNE DEADLINE FOR FILIN6 OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M.ON NOVEMBER 19,1997. QuCSiiODS: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING lOT NOTICE OF FINAL OROER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINC•S OFFICER - FOR THE CTTY OF TIGARD,UREGON Regarding an application by St. Anthony's Parish ) F I N A L O R D E R ' for a conditional use permit for a 72-space parking lot ) to serve existing church and accessory uses at Johnson ) CUP 97-0007 Street and Grant Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (St. Anthony's parking) I. SiTMMARY The applicant requests approval of a condiaonal use permit(CUP)for a major modification to an existing church and accessory uses under CDC 18.130.OSO.A.S. Two parcels ane involved. The church already owns the corner parcel, where up to 47 parking spaces could be developed. The church may purchase the parcel to the west and develop it for the remainder of 72 parking spaces proposed for the combined lot. These spaces will serve the existing church and its accessory uses. The parldng lot will have one driveway onto Johnson Srreet and one onto Grant ' Avenue. The applicant proposes a 10-foot wide landscape buffer around the parking lot, instead of the 20-foot buffer generally required between a parking lot and surrounding single family homes. In exchange, the applicant proposes landscaping in the buffer in excess of Ciry standards. A hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing regard.ing the application. City staff recommended conditional approval of the CUP. Two wimesses testified for the applicant and accepted the findings and conditions of approvals recommended by Ciry staff. Two wimesses testified with concerns about buffering the parking lot from surrounding homes and about the ongoing soil remediadon on part of the site, among other issues. One wimess testified in support. No one else appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application, and the applicant waived its right to have the record held open. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the condi�ional use permit subject to conditions recommended by staff with mod�cations. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit subject to the condirions at the end of this fmal order. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue;WCTM 2S 102BB, tax lots 01700 and 01600 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential (1-5 dwelling units/acre) ZOI�IING: R-4.5 (Detached single family residential) APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish OWNER: St. Anthony Parish and Harris Oil Company APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code ("CDC") Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.1Q2, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Hearings�cer Fina!Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthorry's Parking) Page 1 � II. HEARING AND RECORD , 1. The City subjected the application to the procedures for a conditional use permit, and gave timely notice for a hearing at which public testimony could be offered regarding - the application. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein held such a hearing and closed the public record at the end of the hearing. The public record in this matter includes Exhibit A(Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). The written testimony includes the Staff Report dated October 6, 1997,relevant written material received by the Community Development Deparanent before the hearing and material the hearings officer received at the hearing. Exhibits are filed at Tigard Ciry Hall. 2. Before the hearing, the hearings officer visited the site and sunounding area. He observed the existing access,vegetation, and grades on the site and adjoining properry, the large fenced hole on the site and the condition of the adjoining streets. At the hearing, the hearings officer disclosed the substance of his site visit 3. At the hearing, Mazk Roberts testified for the City and summarized the Staff Report. He noted the proposed parking lot will bring the church complex more nearly into compliance with current City parking standards. He identified the applicable standards. He summarized proposed landscaping. He discussed s�eet dedication and improvement requirements, noting it would be disproportionate to require the applicant to dedicate for and to improve SW Grant Avenue,but that the applicant could choose to do so if it is done consistent with City standards. He discussed the status of the soil remediation process on the Harris Oil property the church may acquire,noting that the City recommends the applicant be required to provide a written statement from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DE�that the remediation process is complete before the City issues a permit allowing the applicant to develop the part of the property where remediation is underway. 4. Landscape architect Edward Ceccacci and Father Leslie Sieg testified for the applicant a. Mr. Ceccacci accepted the Staff Report. He described the neighborhood meeting the applicant held. He said the applicant may dedicate and improve Grant Street. The applicant wants to preserve an option to develop a parldng lot containing up to only 47 spaces if the applicant does not acquire the Harris Oil property. He described a lot with only 47 spaces. He agreed to work on buffering headlights, and requested flexibility regarding landscaping. Mr. Roberts testif'ied that the applicant could apply to reduce the number of parking spaces as a minor modification to the CUP. See CDC 18.130.060. b. Father Sieg testified that the church is monitoring the soil remediation process being conducted by contractors for Harris Oil, but does not control that process. He was uncertain how long it would take. He said that,before the applicant acquires the Harris Oil property, it would require Harris to provide a written statement from DEQ cercifying the process is complete, and no further acdon is needed due to soil contamination. 5. Bill Tubbs and Keith Bemis testified. a. Both shared concerns about the soil remediation process underway on the Harris Oil portion of the site. The reladvely large hole is filled with water that poses a potential hazard, and emits odors and has visual impacts that aze inconsistent with land uses in the vicinity. It is surrounded by a temporary chain link fence. They advocated for rapid compledon of the work. Hearings O�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthony's Parking) Page 2 b. Neither objected to the proposed parking lot, but both argued for a sight- � obscuring fence along the southwest and south edges of the site (where the applicant's . plans do not provide for one). - c. They aLso asked about potential partitioning of the Harris Oil portion of the site (because the back portion of that lot will not be used for the proposed pazking lot). An easement roughly centered on the west edge of the Harris Oil portion of the site provides access to the Harris Oil lot and three lots to the south and southwest. They are concerned that development not adversely affect their access to the easemen� d. They also expressed concern about noise, lights and other impacts that could result from unauthorized use of the parking lot after hours, and asked how the parking lot would be secured against such use. e. Mr.Tubbs also asked if a Ponderosa pine tree on the southwest corner of the site would be preserved. Mr. Ceccaci responded that it is unclear whether the tree is on the site; a survey is planned. 6. Mary Wagner, a member of the church, testified about her observations of the property for the past 40 years. She opined that the proposed use would enhance the site. III. APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RESPONSIVE FINDINGS l. City staff provided basic facts about the site and vicinity in section III of the Staff Report They recommended the hearings officer approve the application, based on the applicable standards and responsive findings in section IV of the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval in section II of the Staff Report. The applicant accepted the findings and recommended conditions without cocrection or objecdon. 2. The hearings officer concurs in the analysis and conclusions offered by city staff; to wit, substantial evidence in the record shows the proposal does or can comply with the applicable standards and criteria for a conditional use pernnit, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent,reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC"). The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions m the October 6 Staff Report as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 3. The greatest concern with the site for residents around the site is the soil clean-up process occurring on the east portion of the Harris Oil property. However the City does not have jurisdiction over that process;it is not a"land use"that requires development review or the like. Arguably a grading permit could be required,but that is not relevant to the conditional use permi�. DEQ has statutory jurisdiction and substantive expertise to oversee clean-up of a site contaminated by oil, and that agency is doing so, based on the testimony. The condition recommended by City staff--- that the applicant provide a written statement from DEQ that no further work is needed to decontaminate the affected portion of the site before the City issues a pernnit to develop it--- is the most the City can require. 4. There was concern that headlights from cars in the parldng lot would shine off- site to the south and west where there are single family homes. There is a board-on-board fence along a portion of the west property line,but that does not protect other areas. The applicant proposed specific numbers and spacing of plant materials shown in the applicant's preliminary landscape plan to buffer the site. Staff recommended enhancing that plan. See proposed condiaon of approval 19. Hearings O,Qruer Fina!Order CUP 97-0007(St. Anthony's Parking) Page 3 • a. The hearings officer has authority to require screening and buffering as a . condition of approval of a condirional use pennit.l � b. CDC 18.130.040.A.1 requires that a conditional use be situated on a site "the size and dimensions [of which] provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use." In this case, the site is not deep enough or wide enough for the applicant to development the number of parking spaces the applicant proposes to develop on the site AND a 20-foot buffer on the west and south. The applicant proposes only a 14-foot wide buffer. Therefore, unless the applicant provides landscaping and/or other screening sufficient to provide at least as much mitigation as would a 20-foot wide landscaped buffer, the application does not comply with CDC 18.130.040.A.i. c. The minunum landscaping between a parking lot and single family dwelling is described in CDC 18.100.080, .110 and .130.2 The hearings officer finds the 1 CDC 18.130.040.0 provides in relevant part that"[t]he Hearings Officer may impose conditions... These condidons may include but are not limited to the following: 7. Requiring landscaping,screening,drainage and surfacing of parking and loading areas... 10. Requiring berming,screening,or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; 11. Requiring and designating the size,height,location and materials for fences..:' 2 CDC 18.100.080.B provides: A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities,screening,sidewalics and bikeways,and landscaping. No buildings,accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in the buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City. CDC 18.100.080.D provides that["Jthe minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1. At least one row of trees shall be planted(according to requirements for spacing and height at planting). 2. In addition,at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon stuvbs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area 3. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn,groundcover or spread with bark mulch. CDC 18.100.080.E provides: Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addidon to those for buffering: 1. A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted which will form a four foot conanuous screen within two years of planting;or 2. An eartlien berm planted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a conanuous screen six feet in height within two years...; or 3. A five foot or taller fence or wall shall be conswcted to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen[subject to the sight distance requirements of CDC 18.102]. CDC 18.100.110.A.1 provides the following standard for screening of paridng and loading areas: Nearings OffutrFinal Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Antho�ry's Parking) Page 4 applicant proposes to provide more plants than required by CDC 18.100.080, .110 and - .130. However the hearings officer also finds the proposed landscape materials are _ generally low-growing. Proposed trees will create a canopy over time, but do not obstruct headlights. A fence is not proposed. The hearings officer finds the proposed landscaping " dces not adequately buffer the homes southwest and south of the site. d.The hearings officer finds the applicant can adequately buffer the west and south edges of the parking lot by installing a minimum 6-foot high sight-obscuring fence on or near the property line (set back from Grant Avenue as needed for sight distance) or a three-foot high berm planted with evergreen shrubs capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years of planting or other landscaping (larger at planting) capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years. The precise design of that landscape buffer is not in the record,but the applicant can prepare a landscape buffer plan (hopefully with the advice and comment of neighbors) and the City staff can review and approve an appropriate plan that provides the final detaiLs for the buffer. Condition of approval 19 should be modified accordingly. e. There is a fence on a portion of the west property line. City staff opined that fence and the 10-foot wide landscape strip buffers the residents of the home to the west from the parlcing lot But the fence on the abutting residential property could be removed or fall into decay, negating its value as a buffer. It is the applicant's responsibility to buffer the use, not the adjoining single family neighbor. Therefore, although it may be duplicative in the short term, the hearings officer finds the applicant shauld be required to install the same screen (i.e., fence or wall, landscaped berm or larger landscaping) on the whole west side of the pazking lot buffer. Condiaon of approval 19 should be mod�ed accordingly. 5. There was concern that lights that illuminate the site would shine off-site. The hearings officer finds such an impact would violate CDC 18.106.020.P.1, which provides that"lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area... shall be so arranged as to direct light away from any adjacent residential distnct." a. The hearings officer finds there is insufficient informadon in the record to determine whether the proposed lights will in fact shine off-site. However the hearings officer further finds that it is feasible for the applicant to submit additional information from which the planning manager can determine that proposed lights will not shine off-site. Light fixtures can be selected or fitted with hoods or deflectors to prevent light from being ca.st off-site. Condition of approva121 should be modified accordingly. 6. The hearings officer agrees with Mr. Roberts that the applicant could apply for a minor modif'ication to the conditional use permit to allow a smaller parking lot(i.e., one containing up to 47 spaces on the property at 9870 SW Johnson Street), and the City could grant such a modif'ication. However the hearings officer further finds that the potential for impacts due to headlights and other lighting on the site is the same whether 47 or 72 spaces are created. Therefore, if the planning manager approves a minor modification to the cond.itional use permit, that modification should continue to require compliance with conditions of approval of this CUP to mitigate the impacts of headlights and site lighdng. a. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot from view... CDC 18.100.130 contains a buffer matrix. Heasings O�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007{St. Anthony's Parking) Page S 7. It is not clear from the record whether the applicant proposes to develop land ' over which an easement exists that precludes such development. That is, the unrebutted . testimony in the record is that there is an easement over the west several feet of the Harris Oil portion of the site. The unrebutted testimony in the record is that owners of that - property and at least three other properties have a right of access to that easement If that unrebutted testimony is correct, then the applicant cannot use the west several feet of the Harris Oil property for a buffer for the parking lot, because that would conflict with the rights of the benefited parties under the easement. Although the City does not enforce the private easement, the existence of such an easement is a fact that is relevant in deciding whether the site is large enough to accommodate the conditional use. If the easement exists and prevenrs the applicant from developing the west several feet of the landscape screen and buffer, the applicant would have to amend the site plan w move the south edge of that screen and buffer a corresponding distance north. This can be resolved in a fmal site plan review process. A condition of approval is warranted requiring the applicant to show whether such an easement exists (e.g., based on a prelimulary title insurance report), and, if so, to modify the site plan accordingly. 8. Access to the parking lot should be controlled to prevent unauthorized use that could conflict with the peaceful occupancy of surrounding homes. Such controls need not be overly restrictive,but some accommodation and protocol should be reached to address this issue. In the site review application, the applicant can propose a spec�c method or methods (e.g., gating the entries, providing security patrols, providing emergency telephone contact numbers for neighbors,et,c.), and the plantung manager can review and approve appropriate measure(s). A condition of approval to this effect should be added. N. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed condicional use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Tigard Commuruty Development Code,provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state,and federal laws and with condidons of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. The applicant's request, CUP 97-0007, is herebv approved, subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report,with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 19 is hereby amended to read as follows: 19. The applicant shall submit and receive approval of a revised landscape plan before the City approves a building or development permit for the parking lot. (a) The revised plan shall provide for landscaped setbacks along Johnson Street and Grant Avenue at least as wide and at least as landscaped as shown on the preliminary plan. (b) A minimum 10-foot wide landscaped buffer strip shall abut the west and south edges of the parking lot. (1) At the outside edge of that strip, the revised plan shall provide a minimum 6-foot high sight-obscuring fence or wall or a three-foot high berm planted with evergreen shrubs capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years of planting or other landscaping (larger at planting)capable of Nearings O�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007 (St. Anthony's Pa�king) Page 6 providing a conanuous 6-foot high screen within two years. ' Fencing and vegetauon shall be set back from Johnson Street . and Grant Avenue as needed for sight distance. ' (2) The applicant may alter the nature,number, size and/or spacing of landscape materials shown on the preliminary plan to achieve a buffering and screening effect equal to or greater than that achieved by the preliminary plan with amendments recommended by City staff. If the applicant proposes landscaping substantially similar to that proposed in the preliminary plan,the revised plan shall provide for a row of trees within the west and south landscape strips, consistent with spacing standards in the CDC, and shall provide for at least 50 five-gallon shrubs within the western landscape strip. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. (c) The applicant shall propose measures to preyent unauthorized access to the parking lot when it is not used for the church or its accessory uses and to facilitate enforcement when needed. The planning manager shall approve such measures if they provide reasonable protection against unauthorized use of the property at times or in a manner that would interfere with the peaceful occupancy of homes in the vicinity. The planning manager may order or allow changes to the measures over time based on experience with the lot b. Condition of approva120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 20. Before the City approves a building or development pennit authorizing development of the pordon of the site owned by Harris Oil, the applicant shall amend the preliminary plan to reflect the existence and limitations imposed by an easement over the west edge of that portion of the site or shall show that such an easement dces not exist or does not restrict use of the property as proposed. STAFF CONfACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. c. Condition of approva121 is hereby amended to read as follows: 21. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan to the Police Department and to the planning manager for review and approval. The plan shall show lighting levels on and off site. The planning manager shall approve the plan if light fixtures do not cast more than one foot-candle of light onto residential poperty. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf(Police Department) and Mark Roberts (Planning Division). DATE is 21st day of ober, 1997. Larry Epste' , CP Tigard He Offi er Xearings O�cer Final Order CUP 97-0007(St. Anthorry's Parkirtg) Page 7 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: October 13, 1997 Time: 7:00 Pfilf � � � STAFF REPORT TO THE - NEARING'S OFFICER �ITY OF TIOAR� Coramu�rity Daxlopmuct FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON .�� SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0007 APPLICANT: Saint Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop Attention: Leslie Sieg of Portland in Oregon 9905 SW McKenzie Street 2838 E. Bumside Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 � OWNER: Harris Oil Company c/o Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard P.O. Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a 72 space overflow parking lot. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102B6, Tax Lot 01600 and 01700. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, 1-5 Dwelling Units Per Acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religious assembly and uses related to religious assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approvaL• STAFF qEPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICEFi CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFI.OW PARKING LOT PAGE 1 OF 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRI�R TD THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, � THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATiSFIED: - x�` ` (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, - Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) _ 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Johnson Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. If the applicant elects to dedicate additional right-of-way to the Public along the frontage of SW Grant Street to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline, the description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Johnson Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff; E. five-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities); I. street signs (if applicable); J. driveway apron (if applicable); and STAFF fiEPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 2 OF 15 K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Johnson . Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 6. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, � which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future • Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Grant Street. 7. If the applicant chooses to make half-street improvements to SW Grant Street, they should include that work as a part of the public improvement plans and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 8. Profiles of SW Johnson Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City, of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. 10. If the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility. 11. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave a proposed development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or dwellings, the downstream stormwater system shall be enlarged to relieve the identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an on-site detention facility. 12. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 13. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 14. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the site permit. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONYS OVERROW PARKING LOT PAGE 3 OF 15 15. Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be . provided within the existing parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Funk, Building . Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for - the proposed use. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. The applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. The previous oil sales site is presently partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of permits to redevelop this property. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 19. Along the northwesterly property line the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a minimum of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 20. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees that are spaced in compliance with the minimum spacing standard based on their size at maturity within the westerly buffer area. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 21. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan to the Police Department for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf, Police Department. 22. An arborist report shall be provided that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed. The report shall also review any special construction techniques that will be needed to be used to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional tree(s) then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. Also. if the Sequoia trees cannot be preserved a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING AND/OR SITE INSPECTI�N: _ (Un(ess otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 23. Prior to final site inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTNONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 4 OF 15 24. Prior to a final site inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built . drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the . as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. � 25. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311. THlS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS ;�� s,�� FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE.OF THIS DECISION. �,y. �� SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: The subject properties are presently undeveloped. One of the two properties has previously been used for an oil sales use and has since, been discontinued. The site was cleared of the structures that utilized the property for that purpose. Presently, a portion of this property has been excavated. Apparently this has been done to remove contaminated soils. The property at the corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue has been used for overflow parking purposes by the church for several years. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north of the subject properties are existing detached single-family residences. To the south is a portion of the Saint Anthony's Church facilities. To the west of the property is a detached single-family residence. To the east are other detached single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant has proposed to develop 72 parking spaces as an overflow parking lot for related religious assembly purposes. A remainder of the fo�mer oil sales site is to be left undeveloped for future use. Public Hearing notices regarding this application stated that the overflow parking lot was to consist of 47 spaces based on the information contained within the applicant's narrative. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97�000�-SAINT ANTFiONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 5 OF 15 and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement. The applicant has proposed to construct half street improvements . on their SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue street frontages. The Engineering . Department has estimated the cost of half street improvements to be approximately $175.00 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of - the half street improvements to SW Grant Avenue is $42,000.00 (240 ft. x $175.00). Based on past City purchases of property for street right-of-way (ROW), property is assessed at $3.00 per square foot. The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately an additional 2,400 square feet of right-of-way along SW Grant Avenue. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $7,200.00 (10 feet x 240 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $49,200. Assuming a cost $175.00 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half street improvements to SW Johnson Street is $25,725.00 (147 ft. x $175.00). The applicant has offered to dedicate approximately 735 square feet of right-of-way. Assuming a cost of $3.00 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication is $2,205.00 (5 feet x 147 lineal feet x $3). The total cost for dedication and improvements is $27,930. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Because no new building or expansion is proposed, the applicant will be not required to pay TIF's. Therefore, no unmitigated impact can be found to exist with the construction of this parking lot. For this reason, the City is not recommending dedication of right-of-way and street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue frontage. The $27,930 of dedication and improvements on the SW Johnson Street apply directly to impacts on the local system. It can be argued for the local street system to function to serve all properties at buildout that streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. The applicant's proposal for improvements provides for the share of local street improvements needed to serve this development in conjunction with the standard improvements that are required of all other properties. In other words, the applicant is paying only for their portion or segment of the local street system. Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. Based on these findings, the City recommends that the Conditions of Approval requiring street right-of-way dedication and improvements along the SW Johnson Street frontage are roughly proportional to the impacts of the development. Although the City has not recommended requiring street improvements along the SW Grant Avenue street frontage, Conditions of Approval have been provided within this report that allow the applicant to provide these improvements, at their discretion, in order to give the site a finished appearance. The test of rough proportionality does not require a precise mathematical calculation or a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAHING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 6 OF 15 _ Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 72 space overflow parking . lot to serve religious assembly services for the Saint Anthony's church. This use is . classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a religious assembly. Code Section 18.50 lists religious assembly as a conditionally permitted use in the R-4.5 Zoning � District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.50 provides minimum lot size and setbacks standards. However, these standards are superseded by the Conditional Use Permit standards that are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Setback: Section 18.50 sets front, side and rear yard setback standards for new structures. No new structures have been proposed. However, as reviewed elsewhere within this report Section 18.100 does set standards for land use buffers where a parking lot adjoins a detached single-family residence. Environmental Performance: Section 18.90.020 states in part that each use or activity within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state, federal and state environmental regulations. The previous oil sales site is presently, partially excavated and fenced, apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of permits to redevelop this property. � Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. The applicant has a total of 387 feet of lineal frontage on SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. This frontage length would require a minimum of ten new street trees. The applicant has proposed to plant eight new Red Sunset Maple trees and to incorporate two existing Sequoia trees into the site plan for use as street trees. Based on their size at maturity, these trees are considered large specimens and comply with the spacing standard. If the arborist report finds that the two Sequoia trees that are to be incorporated into the site as street trees ca�e preserved as such, a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. . ,�p� Screeninq and Bufferinq between land use tvpes: Section 18.100 sets minimum screening and buffering standards between land use types of varying intensities. Section 18.100 includes a Buffer Matrix Chart that requires a minimum of a 20 foot distance for parking lots with more than 25 parking spaces. At a minimum the buffer must contain the following: 2) a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and 3) shrubs of varying numbers based on their size at planting. Where a screening is also required one of the following must be provided: 1) a row of evergreen shrubs, 2) a five foot minimum height fence, or 3) an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. Alternatively, the Director can approve a modified buffer plan which provides the same level of screening with a different combination of screening and buffering elements. The buffering and screening criteria is not found to be applicable along the limits of the northwesterly portion of the former oil sales site that abuts areas to be developed in the future. This standard would be applicable in the future if the church or other use was to later develop this remainder area. As provided in Section 18.100.070 buffering but not STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCEH CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 7 OF 15 screening standards are found to be applicable along the SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue frontages. The screening and buffering standards are found to be applicable along . the northwesterly and westerly property lines because the site adjoins existing residential , uses. The applicant has proposed to develop a row of parking spaces within a narrowed buffer � area. A 20-foot buffer width is normally required between parking lots of 25 spaces or more and detached single-family residences. The applicant has shown a 10-foot buffer width. To utilize a lesser width the applicant must provide increased plantings or other screening and buffering materials that would provide the same level of screening and buffering. For a screening and buffering area along the northwesterly property line, the applicant has proposed 17 Westem Red Cedar trees spaced at 10 feet on center. The applicant has also proposed approximately 14 Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs. The neighbor's existing six-foot fence is also to be used as buffering. The applicant specified on the plans that the majority of the Cotoneaster plantings were five-gallon in size. Assuming that these plantings are all five-gallon plantings, a minimum of 25 are required to be provided for a buffer area of 2,300 square feet. Because the buffer width has been reduced in half, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide double the amount of shrub planting to a total of 50, five-gallon shrubs or provide an altemate plan that affords the same level of buffering and screening. Due to their large size at maturity and tight ten-foot on center spacing, the proposed Westem Red Cedar trees exceed the minimum standard. For buffering and screening along the site's westerly property line the applicant has proposed a double row of 46, five gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings within a ten-foot buffer width. The applicant has also proposed eight RedTwig Dogwood shrubs planted in the westerly comer of the property. Because this buffer area is 1,200 square feet in area, a minimum of 24, five-gallon plantings are required where shrubs are used to meet the screening and buffering requirements. The 46 Cotoneaster plantings are approximately two times the minimum standard and are found to partially mitigate for the reduced buffer width. The applicant has not provided a row trees in this area. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a row of trees within the westerly buffer area. For screening along the property's street frontage on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street, the applicant has proposed a double row of 63, five-gallon Pamey Cotoneaster plantings and ten street trees, also within a ten-foot buffer width. The buffer area is approximately 3,470 square feet which requires a minimum of 35, five-gallon shrub plantings. The 63 proposed shrubs are nearly double the minimum planting requirements and appear to be sufficient for buffering purposes given that the street right-of-way will also buffer this site from adjoining uses. Screenina Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has proposed a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrubs to screen the parking lot from view. The applicant STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT AN7HONYS OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 8 OF 15 has also proposed to provide seven trees throughout the proposed parking lot of 72 parking . spaces. The landscape islands that have been proposed are in excess of the three-foot minimum dimension. A curb has been proposed around the landscape planter islands to protect the proposed plantings. • Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by rneasuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear visian area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parkinq: Section 18.106.030 states that churches which use bench or pew seating within the congregation area are required to provide one parking space for every six feet of bench length. A two way drive aisle width of 24 feet is required to be maintained. Minimum parking space sizes of 8'8" by 18' for standard parking spaces and 8' by 15' for compact spaces are required to be provided. The church's Business Manager states that the congregation area currently has a total of 1,666 feet of pew seating. By dividing 1,666 by 6, a total of 278 spaces would be required to serve this facility if it were developed under current standards. The church is currently served by 147 parking spaces. The proposed overflow parking lot would add 72 spaces for a total of 219. This will still leave a deficit of 58 parking spaces. Because the church was not required to construct this parking lot during the review of previous church expansions and no building expansion is proposed, no specific minimum parking ratio has been found to apply to this application. The two-way drive aisle width and proposed parking space size comply with the minimum size standard. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that where up to 100 parking spaces are provided that a minimum of one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet shall be provided. The applicant has proposed two driveways for this purpose, in compliance with this standard. A driveway has been proposed on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street. Site Development Review - Approval Standards• Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.(A): (3) (Exterior Elevations), (5) (Privacy and Noise), (6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), (7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97�0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERROW PAAKING LOT PAGE 9 OF 15 (8) (Open Space Dedication), (9) (Demarcation of Spaces), (12) (Public Transit), (17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. These sections are . addressed elsewhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION � 18.120.180(A): (2) (Tree Removal), (4) (Buffering and Screening and Compatibility Between - Adjoining Uses, (10) Crime Prevention and Safety), (11) (Access and Circulation), (13) (Parking), (14) (Landscaping), (15) (Drainage), (16) (Provisions for the handicapped), and (18) (Underlying Provisions of the Zone) are addressed immediately below or elsewhere within this staff report: Tree Removal: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) states that building shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Building shall also not be located to in areas subject to slumping and sliding, with adequate provision for light, air, fire fighting capabilities and circulation. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. No buildings are being proposed so portions of this section are not applicable to this request. The applicant has proposed to preserve and incorporate two of the three existing trees onto the site plan for use as street trees. The applicant states that a third tree is to be removed because it is dead. An arborist report is recommended that examines the condition of the tree to be removed and the suitability of the other trees for incorporation into the site as street trees. If the trees are found to be suitable for preservation, the arborist report will also need to provide recommended protection measures during the construction process. Bufferinq, Screeninq and Compatibilitv Between Adioininq Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal provided specific screening materials that would be utilized where the parking lot adjoins existing detached single-family residences. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening and buffering plan that is in compliance with the standards of Section 18.100 which is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen the parking lot through the use of a double row of Pamey Cotoneaster shrub plantings which adjoin the site's frontage on its SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street frontages. The applicant has not proposed to construct storage areas or a building which would require the screening of storage and rooftop equipment. Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and stated that suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid- point at the north and south boundaries. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide type lighting is preferable. The applicant shall obtain approval of security lighting from the Police Department. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONYS OVERFIOW PARKING LOT PAGE 10 OF 15 The proposed landscaping may at some future time become a potentia� problem. The � parking lot should, at no point, become completely screened from the view of the traveling ' public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely " screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, (particularly solitary situations) . but also manifests loitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens , and/or emergency responders. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parkinq: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Qff-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaainq: Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The Conditional Use Permit invokes applicable standards of the Site Development Review as approval criteria. The landscape section requires that a minimum of 15% of the site be landscaped. The proposed use would be comprised of two separate parcels totaling 1.10 acres. A site of this size requires a minimum of 7,187 square feet of landscaping. The site plan appears to provide in excess of 8,000 square feet of landscaping but no precise calculation has been provided. The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. . Drainaqe: Section 18.120.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water � runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. The Engineering Department has y recommended that additional downstream analysis be provided to demonstrate that no existing storm drainage facility deficiency exists. Provisions for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVEFiROW PARKING LOT PAGE 11 OF 15 The use, as proposed, �.,�nplies with all site development s,�,�dards set forth within the' ' R-4.5 Zoning District and as modified by the Conditional Use Permit standards. It appears that required public facilities can be made available to serve the site as proposed. , All applicable standards of the zoning district can be met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. _ Two mature trees have been noted on this site that are proposed to be incorporated into the site as street trees. A third tree is proposed to be removed as the applicant states that this tree is dead. An arborist report has been required to investigate the condition of the tree that is stated to be dead and the suitability of the two Sequoia trees for incorporation into the site. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Specific Conditional Use Permit Standard for Reliqious Assemblv uses: Section 18.130.150(10) sets specific standards for lot size and setbacks for religious assembly uses. This section provides front, side rear and corner setback standards for new religious assembly structures. This section also requires a 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. No structure has been proposed, therefore, the setbacks standards are not applicable. Each of the two building site's are in excess of the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size. Because the two sites would share common site improvements, the applicant shall either provide proof of a lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to incorporate two mature Sequoia trees into the landscape ptan. The applicant has also proposed to remove one tree that appears to be dead. Because the only two healthy mature trees on these property's are to be incorporated into the site plan, no tree mitigation is required. The applicant did not provide an arborist report that reviews the condition of the tree that is proposed to be removed and any special construction techniques that will be need to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. An arborist report shall be provided which addresses these issues. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can be incorporated into the site, then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation ratio standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional trees, then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 12 OF 15 PUBLIC FACILITY CONC,�RNS: � The City has adopted Unified Sewerage Agency standards concerning Water �uality, � Grading and Erosion Control requirements are addressed within this portion of the . staff report. Provisions for water service to the site has been reviewed. Sections . 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) and 18.164.120 (Underground Utilities) sets forth standards for the aforementioned utilities these standards have also been reviewed below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. SW Johnson Street Southwest Johnson Street is classified as a local residential street, west of SW Grant Street, and therefore requires a 50-foot right-of-way (ROW). There is presently 40 feet of total ROW adjacent to this site (20 feet each side of centerline). The applicant should, as a part of developing this site, dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from centerline. The applicanYs narrative indicates that they will provide this dedication. The roadway is paved, but does not meet current City standards for a local residential street. Because this site generates a significant amount of traffic from church services and related activities, and the street is substandard, the applicant should improve the " south side of Johnson Street as a part of this project. A half-street improvement is appropriate in this case. The applicant's narrative indicates that they are willing to improve the street. SW Grant Street Southwest Grant Street is classified as a minor collector street in this area, and requires a 60-foot ROW overall. At present, there is only 40 feet of ROW overall. In order to facilitate the widening of the street to meet City standards, the applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 30 feet from centerline. The applicanYs narrative indicates they will provide this ROW dedication. This street is also paved, and is fully improved on the east side adjacent to the main church site. However, the west side is not improved to City standards. Although the applicant's narrative states that they are willing to improve the street, Staff believes that the impact from this parking lot development does not warrant improvement to the minor collector at this time. 18.164.030(A)(1)(c) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a non-remonstrance agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. If, however, the applicant would like to make the additional street improvements, they should obtain the necessary permit from the City Engineering Department. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONYS OVEFiFIOW PARKING LOT PAGE 13 OF 75 WATER: There are public water lines in both SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Since this project is a parking lot, no additional public water line work is necessary. � SANITARY SEWER: - There witl be no additional public sanitary sewer line work required. STORM DRAINAGE: The topography of this site slopes to the northwest. There is an existing 12-inch public storm sewer line adjacent to the east side of the roadway. This line carries street runoff toward Fanno Creek. The applicant submitted a downstream analysis, prepared by their engineer, which indicates that the 12-inch line is at or near capacity for carrying the 10- year storm event. It also indicates that the line has only 60% of the capacity required to convey the 100-year storm event. The City's public storm drainage system must be designed to convey a 25-year storm event, as required by USA's Design and Construction Standards. It is not clear from the applicant's materials, whether or not the existing system can adequately convey the additional runoff from this site under 25-year event conditions. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit additional information to the Engineering Department with regard to downstream conditions. If there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the applicant can either upsize that system, or provide on-site detention. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant has indicated that they will provide a water quality facility near the northeast corner of the site. The preliminary calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer indicate the pond will need to be approximately 684 cubic feet. The applicant's site plan will need to accommodate that pond size. The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0007•SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 14 OF 15 GRADING AND EROSIG�� CONTROL: - USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and • other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from . development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which , accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Street. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking Iot. The Police Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: Suggested security lighting would be to have possibly three smaller lighting standards, as opposed to one large lighting source. Suggested placement may be at the location originally noted, with additional fixtures mid-point at the north and south boundary. A lighting engineer should be consulted to obtain the maximum efficiency for the type of lighting chosen. Metal Halide type lighting is our preference. The proposed landscaping may at some future time become a potential problem. The parking lot should at no point become completely screened from the view of the traveling public. Maximum height adjoining the street should not exceed three feet. Completely screening the parking lot not only presents dangers to users, particularfy solitary situations but also manifests loitering, concealment and potential threats to unsuspecting citizens andlor emergency responders. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comrr�ents or objections have been received. GjG' L�C � � October 6, 1997 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE iate Planner � October 6, 1997 APPROV D BY: Richard Bewers orff DATE Planning Manag�er i:lcurpinlma rkr�cu p97-07.dec STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICEH CUP 97-0007-SAINT ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PAGE 15 OF 15 EX I�' CONC STORPI SEINER EX fiRE NYDRANT , '�� ADDITIONAL ROW EIIfCdTEQ OCATION OF ON-SITE WAT R � �� Z OUAL�TY TREATPIENT BASIN � I Ex �' WATER LiNE E7CISTING ROW _ — — — � I O PROPOSED ROW GB AT LOW POINT 1N �� 0' � � PARKING LO'T — � — - � w SW JOI-INSON 0 - - - - - - - STREET— VI G _ PROP DRAIN I.INE � G C C G �� E I , — G G � � L � � � ' X INV OUT IN.17 � c \ � � Z C I � C I INVRaHT1�9I6C Q _ ` � w '�` a. TAX L� IiOp G (. C C � ' ] �� ' � . L� C ' (Z I� EXIBT�NG PLAT FIELD3 � BECURITI' G ' C Q Ilr � I �I � C �l� � /�1 -�--, _ _ � � Z I � o� — —� I Q � �-- I � �� 1�� i„� � � 1. � � � 3 �1 � rax �ar i�oo � c . '-� `'� �l � � II '"' � � � � �"' � ' � r � � � � � � � � � � , � r U � _ _ _ _ � II� I 11 I SITE PLAH CASE Nc�. � St. Anthony's ' E��B�T MAp Overflow Parking Lot � CUP 97-0007 . , i i . ' • I � I I � I I I . � I \��\� , J ``\\ �J � SI�C II I � � � � I j , }, i I � � i I W � � I� � , � i� I =ZN i � i � , � � n i �; �,QO �I � II j �'�S� N I � I � O F,o� �� > � w � •— � � � s �°�s- � ° <-- T B!E � '� � o U � , � P ' — � � �' �� I ��ti � I � ' �,. c�� , .F �; �� i= . � � � s�. �, � . �� ; � ._ � U �� vicinity Mau N ' CUP 97-0007 SL Anthony's ��-� � O�erflow Parking Lot � � � EXHI� ._�+, �3 � , Bill Tubbs NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER 12531 SW Grant CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP197-0001 Tigard OR 97223 ST.ANTNORY'S OYERFLOW PARKIN6 LOT Keith Bemis h:\patty\docs\cup97-07.Ibs 12535 SW Grant Tigard OR 97223 Mary Wagner 9885 SW Johnson Street Tigard OR 97223 Edward Ceccacci Ceccacci Associates 0125 SW Gibbs Portland OR 97201 Harris Oil Company c/o Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard PO Box 42287 Portland OR 97242 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon 2838 E. Burnside Portland OR 97214 Leslie Sieg Saint Anthony Parish 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard OR 97223 . , - C�NDITI4NAL USE APPLICATION y 13125 SW Hal!Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 CITY OF TIGARD GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: !'�I�' �� Q DATE OF PRE-APP.: '7 PropertyAddress/Location(s): 9��0 Sl�l� Jof/N50^J �� FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s):�Sl oZ ��> C j,��g 7 - UDO Case No.(s):_ 7 %/-�il' �O f /�UO f / 7 DL' Other Case No.(s): Site Size: .58 a.c. Receipt No.: �7 � �°f�3 SU Archdiocese of Portland AppliCation ACCepted By: CCi Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': St. Anthonv Parish Date: f(�l��'-� Address: _4905 Sw McKenzie St. Phone: (503)639-4179 -T—� City: TiQard, OR Zip: 97223 AppliCant`: St. Anthonv Parish bv Leslie M. SieQ Date Determi ed To e Complete: Address: 9905 SW McKenzie St. Phone:(503)639-4179 � 2� q7 � Comp PIan/Z ne Designation: '�� City: Ti ard OR Zip: 97223 � LOW etisr '��,r a S CG�y -- �QGLACC�� Ct� �SSOCjat�S 2�I!- `;`��IZ 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: G�'�"��"c+�l authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Re,,.arz�7 i:kxupinVnasterslcua doc must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSALSUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional Use approval to allow (please be specific): Paving the above � Application Elements Submitted: lot s for church arkin . '72 S r�� / �ttOn Form �- /'�eD' �" O ner's Si nature/Written Auth ri - y`'� Lo�- [� � 9 o z a t i o n � n ��Title Transfer Instrument or Deed �� Site/Plot Pfan � (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ` �� 0�ite/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/�"x 11") ¢Q� � 66�Rf fio�F� � , R� s , c� � � e�,Q� [��Applicant's Statement � � (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ;4 ❑ USA Sewe� Use Information Card ,I (Distributed/completed at application submittaq `,��+ � G_ (]Filing Fee$1,615.00 � 1 /� r , . � , List any VARlANCE. CONDI710NAL USE, SENSITNE LANDS� OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be co�sidered as paR of this appl(catlo�: Conditional use a��lication or adjoining tax 1c,t i�nn ax ma� �b 1 �RR See attached letter for authorization. _ APPLlCANTS: To constde� an appitcaUon complete, you wilf need to submlt ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMtTTA� ELEMENTS as described on ths front ot this appllcation I�the"Requlred Submitt�l Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Infortna0on shee�s can be obtained, upon request, for all typ�es of Land Use Applicabons.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL C�RTiFY THAT: . The above reauest does not violate anv deed resMc ion� tfiat may ba att9che; to or imo�e� �non the subjg,t �4i�S�Y. • If the appGcation is granted, tt�e appl'�cant wi11 exercise the righ�s granted in accordance with the terms and subjeci to all the conditions and fimitadons of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in tfie plot plan, attactiments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the aFpficants sa ac,knowledge tt�at any pertnit issued, based on this appC�catlo�, may be revoked if it is found that any suct�statements are false. ' • The app(icant has read tf�e entrne contents of the application, induding the pol'icies and criteria. and understands the requiremenfs for approving o�denying tfie application. . SIGNATURES oi g,�owner of the subject property. l�t�f DATED this day of /�G� 19�_ ��-� �� 4vmer's Signature Owner's Signature Owners Signature Owne�s Signature 2 .y CITY OF TIGARD Comnnnrity`.1h�r��°lopnlent ih�1�iny�7'l�cft�'r('unr�uunitr� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0007 FILE TITLE: ST.ANTNONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon Attn: Leslie Sieg 2838 E. Burnside 9905 SW McKenzie Street Portland, OR 97214 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4179 (503) 639-4179 OWNER: Harris Oil Company c/o Sunset Fuel Company 2944 SE Powell Boulevard PO Box 42287 Portland, OR 97242 REQUEST: A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Located at the southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to � establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religeous assembly and uses related to religeous assembly. APPLICABLE � REVIEW � CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. CIT: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request __________________________________________________________________________________._ �,� DECISION MAKING BODY � DATE COMMENTS DUE: Friday - September19,1991 STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 1( HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: T.B.A. TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION x VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE R ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN x OTHER _ STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 x317 CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKWG LOT PROPOSAURE�UEST FOR COMMENTS " l APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE 8/15/97 Saint Anthony Catholic Church Proposed Parking Expansion This Application for conditional use for the development of a 47 car overflow parking lot at the South West corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street serves to amend the existing conditional use for Saint Anthony Catholic Church. The underlying zoning for this site is R-4.5 Single-Family Residential. Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.50.040.A.12 allows "Religious Assembly" as an acceptable conditional use within an R-4.5 zone. We have responded to the Tigard Municipal Code's conditional use criteria Section 18.130.040 Approval Standards as follows: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use. The approximately 29,000 sq. ft. site for the proposed parking lot provides adequate room for the development of 47 additional compact parking spaces. A ten foot planting buffer entirely around the site will provide enough coverage to screen the parking lot from view from the streets and adjacent neighbors. 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. The corners of the site are roughly at right angles allowing relative ease of laying out parking spaces in a regular configuration. The proposed parking lot is within 350 feet of the entrance to the Church. With the addition of a sidewalk along the west side of SW Grant Avenue and the existence of the sidewalk on the east side of Grant Avenue, pedestrian circulation will easily be facilitated from the proposed parking lot and the other Saint Anthony Catholic Church Properties. The topography on the site slopes gently between 2% and 4% allowing it to easily be graded as a parking lot. One 'hazardous' tree (as defined by Tigard Municipal Code chapter 18.150.030) will be removed without requiring a permit. Two additional trees, both ponderosa pines exist on the south east corner of the property and will remain. The only other vegetation on site are weeds and grasses which will be removed to accommodate site development. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. The proposed parking lot addition will utilize electricity to power one security light. Storm water will connect to existing storm sewer in Grant Avenue, water quality and on site detention will be implemented as required. The public right of way will be extended with the construction of the new parking lot; adding curb, sidewalk, one half street improvements with the dedication of additional right of way. � � - -- 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The Zoning district for this site is R-4.5. No residential development is proposed on the site at this time. The parking lot is being developed as an extension of an existing conditional use permit, which is allowed by the base zone. S. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met. No signs will be installed on the proposed parking lot, thus Chapter 18.114 is not applicable. Total site area: 28,890 sq. ft. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. This site is designated Low Density Residential. THE FOLLOWING SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLY TO THIS PROPOSAL: �treet Trees: (18.100.035) (8) 'Red Sunset' Red Maple street trees will be planted less than 40 on center along SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street frontages. Buffering/Screening Requirements: (18.100.080) As a buffer along the northern property line of the site there will be a row of (17) Western Red Cedar planted 10 feet on center; there will also be a double hedge row of Parney Cotoneaster with Cotoneaster dammeri ground cover. To the south of the Cedar there shall also be a double hedge row of parney Cotoneaster a broadleaf evergreen h�dge, with Cotoneaster dammeri ground cover that continues around the southern property line. Along the southern property line there will also be a row of 'Red Sunset' red maples at 30 feet on center. The south east and south west corners will be planted with (7) Red Twig Dogwood at 5 feet on center. Screening from the road will be accomplished by a double hedge row of Parney Cotoneaster with Cotoneaster dammeri ground cover below the street trees. Si�ht Distance at Entrances: (18.102.020) Planting buffers will be reduced to vegetation less than 3 feet in height at the street intersection corner of the site as well as at driveway entrances per Tigard Municipal Code. Bicycle Parkin� Spaces: (18.106.020.0.1) � � _ 18 bicycle spaces will be provided (1 space per 15 cars) and will be located in accordance to Tigard Municipal Code. Site Lighting: (18.106.020.P.1) The proposed parking lot will be provided with security lighting on a single pole. No light will spill into the adjacent residential properties. ParkinE Dimensions: (18.106.020 & 18.106.040.A.1) The proposed parking lot will have two 30' access driveways, one each on SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson street. All of the proposed compact spaces will be designated and labeled 'Compact'. Up to 40% of all the parking spaces are permitted to be compact (From the total of 224 total spaces 58 spaces constitute 38% of the spaces). 7 total Handicap parking spaces shall be provided per ADA requirements. Qne-half Street Improvements: (18.164) Additional right-of-way on SW Grant Avenue shall be dedicated to 30 feet (half width} to allow for paving of 20 feet from the centerline of the road. The right-of- way on SW Johnson shall be extended to 25 feet (half width) to allow for paving of 16 feet from the centerline of the road. There shall also be curbs and pedestrian walkways installed per Tigard Municipal Code requirements. Existin� Overhead Utilities: (18.164.120) It is the Applicant's understanding that the development standards requires existing overhead utilities on SW Johnson to be buried or that a fee-in-lieu be paid. The applicant will opt to pay the fee. Zonin� District Dimensional Requirements: (Zoned R-4.5) Proposed development lot size lot size: 28,894 square feet (20,000 required) Average lot width: 126 feet (50 required) Analvsis of Down Stream Conditions: � A detailed analysis of the down stream conditions will be prepared. Water quality for storm water run-off will be handled on site per USA design and construction standards. Detention will be provided on site, if required by the down-stream analysis. � . . � Imnact Studv: With the development of this site we will concur with the dedication of required right-of -way. Overflow parking will primarily be used on off peak hours on Sundays and weekends. Soil Conditions: No structures will be built on this site. Currently there is a gravel base on the majority of the site that will be excavated or used as fill below the AC paving. Planting beds will be amended before vegetation is planted. No erosion control measures will be necessary for this development. Fire Protection: There currently exists one fire hydrant on the north east corner of the site. Water Suoolv• No water supply will be required for the development of the proposed parking lot. All proposed vegetation are drought tolerant and will not require irrigation. � � �: �� . � O.. I.��- I JJ i .�:�lt�f� I•I I 1�',UI•I �.L. i 1 i d�.,. .�4J..+I �t��.�J�J , i • � r . � WALKER / DILORETO / YOUNIE, INC. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL • CIVIL ENGiNEERS August 15. 1997 Principafs Ro6ertA. Walker Ceccacci Associates Dale J.DlLoreto 0125 SW Gibbs H'ade W. Younre Portland, Oregan 97201 Cole G.Presthus Attn: Ed Ceccacci Associate RE: SA1NT ANTHONY CATHOUC CHURCH Michael Coront! PARKING LOT ADDITION TIGARD, QREGON Dear Mr. Ceccacci: At your request, we have reviewed the above mentioned proposed parking lot addition relative to storm drain runoff. As schematically shown on your drainage plan, sheet 4, the proposed parking lot is{ocated at the northwest comer of Grant Avenue and Johnson Street. ft is part of and 8{+/-}acre drainage basin serviced by an existing 12 inch diameter concrete storm sewer pipe. This pipe runs continuous from its outfall in Fanno Creek and cxtends southwesterly along the east side of Grant Avenue to SE Walnut Street. Storm water runoff from Walnut Street and properties to the south, drain ta existing storm drain lines in Walnut Street. Our preliminary storm drain calculations (see attached calculations) indicate that the existing 12 inch pipe is at or near its capacit�r for carrying the 10 year storm runoff from the entire basin (including the proposed parking Iot addition). The proposed parking lot appears to be the last undeveloped iot of this drainage basin so increased runoff coming from within the basin is not likely. Our preliminary storm drain calculations also indicate that the existing 12 inch pipe has about fi0% of the capacity required to carry the 100 ysar storm runoff, when the pipe is flowing full (no hydraulic head}. The existing pipe capacity increases as hydraulic head (depth of water within the catch basins) increases. The average flow line depth of the pipe is approximately 3.5 feet. �1lamer�e Ahrk Plaza Recent conversations with Mr. Mike Miils of the Public Works Department of the 6e:os.►+.'A�acadam City of Tigard indicated that Fanno Creek at Grant Avenue regularty floods Surte 360 adjacent property to the south of Fanno Creek. Mr. Mills nor, Grant Avenue r�,•�re,te, OR 97101 residents interviewed, indicated that the 12 inch diameter pipe or catch basins F�xso3nae-.�v�9 connected to it had experienced flooding in the last two years of heavy rainfall S03/768-3930 St. Anthony Parking Lot Page 2 which caused 1 QO year storm runoff levels in Washington County. This indicates that runoffs larger than the 10 year storm are still able to be transported by the existing 12 tnch pipe wiE�its hydrautic�rade line remaininq below existing finish grade levels. If you have any questions regarding the above, piease call our office. Sincerely� WALKER/DIL�RETO/YOUNIE, INC. . . , .� ��,EO oTHs � �'��.� a io�� G PR�� 12-�-� Cole G. Presthus, P.E. Enclosure WALKER / DILORETO / YQUNIE, INC. CONSULTING STRUCTURAL • CIVIL ENGINEERS Job �, ,q��-{�k� �� Job No. Sheet No. �� CL'ent�'� Date 7� '�', g�t� -- - r-- -- ' -;-- j--�-. - l__-�- -�-�--�----J--- --�-�-1�L_._�___�-__�__--�---j Princ�P�+ � � I i ' ; ; I i ' , ' ' _.._L__ '��'_I_' �__Y_�..' � I __a_��•_"�._.. _� 1 �„I I ' I � . 1 �� r "'�T�'.f_' ' i---+--._ �,, �` , ' -�-- RoberrA. walkc� — ' - - -r-�--i- -��--'''--I- , - '--�._ .. �•-�-_.-:-_�� _..�—l. -_=i --; � �� T ` .. . ' 1 � � � � Da/e!. DiLoreto -- , - - -'—�d L4k� .!_- ' _. _ � _ ' -' - � - ,� ' -•�--�-�----f---�-- WG[�C W YOWIlC I {- _.�_"�I--� ' ��-_-�'-...-.�___ �A_'r� '�___r _�"i'�__'i—: - ' ' ' . I I �� , ; f ; � ----i----' , -�- .� , ' � �__ , , . -- -,--�-.-- ---- -----_ _ .�_. � I � ' , Cok G. Presthus � - - -----��vl.c-�-K��_}�e]�3�F�,_�--�----i--_.--r- -i•—f--- -�--�--� ' _ ` �►-�I-�-�� - f --�-- , . : , , ; --�--�- ;._. � I � - _�-_ ._-_---� • �--r-i-� ?-- --.-i.-�_ _..� ;_;.._ �--4.�_-- -.+—i. j I. j_� AJJOC7Glt --.-�I�;t._l:�eC}3�i C.. +i�.. � � _ � -.s I - —� ��,� ��i -;�-T �� ' � G��-�-�� , Michae/Coronel -�-'..�_ ( �.1._� -;� -- -�--�- - ' --� i � ! � i _ I f � ' ' � - � .: � � , � . r , , ! ! � � , , , _.. . , , I , 7_—+. ..—�---•- - �- �,_ , —. __.��_ _ � ._, .�..7 , .. , , �-- � � -; , ' _i___�_—;---- � � —�--; __.. .._:M�iC-._.�}",.-1 _ ;��:. _ ._ ! � : ._ ��. __:lfir.:--�1�� ' -- -� ---I-_,._ ___.�,_...I._.. . 1� �('� ��.r� y-� � ' 1 � '��G�-.v<-1!_r_..... ��J�T ' � � I � _ -._. .:�x:._. �5..-L.:._ � - 5 ; . __ _�. ! ' � ' � ! i ; � � , i - I-1 ---- `--- ---r- .- _ , • , ._ .�_ : , �---- �----- -r ^— _ _.....__.___. _..; _.__._.._.. � •- -� — --- .� i..�....__�__... _,. � I � �� . ,:... _._�_. :�1.IY��_.C?�.�..: .� � � 1��.��..� T _`A• �_ .? .' ' � ' � ! ' . � � � � I i � t..,.i I --�— ,—. -- � 1__�. - --�.._ ' .__L ' I ' --'F� -� --T- -!----'----- ; �.--- �j-�a, ' __.,_-------- � -1----�---�-- , , _.__�-__-_-"__:. , ._.�._.- -- '-- _ r...—. . i �� ,�r/�/ ��/�} � /� ( � t -'�-r---.`!.�1�1✓1.1.t..�_�"^�{(]/�___...i�TY`,.,�_..-a--. _.Jl��-�r°"a-yr' _�}---�.!'V/�yi�r�-- 1 .., � I j � j_i ! � 1_ ( � � � � I 1 � � �. f � � � � -—•-�-- - � .-.. . ,'_._ ; , � I . .�" C'._•--�-.-..�-- i , �-T-�-. —�__. .--'. _. --'__.....r__...�_'_�-�,.q'-."�..�_ - '' ` -T--I--�-� i` � I f i � i I I i� —i. . � --{--+---� _._�.._j—.�_.._...;..__.�_,.._ ._:._._. !�---;--- ---i-- -�--•-- - . � �, ��` � � ; : . � � � i � �� _+ --- ,- -- —F--;_._._� . .. � m._!.._!. a-____�_.--f------�---- - `� � � � � T. , � � � � T.__�I_.__..� _ _ i ' � � .��i � -��_.—�_._`'� T. "�_. I "T'�I--�__'_ ' _. i �- i . I � � i ' , � �� I � I , -� - ---a-- {_ -r-.-;_.__i .--f--.----,-- --- -- , �--�--- --t--,--- �; i. ��..�. ! . I � i ._. , i ; � —8��`.�`�r ;__.�_t_.a..—�.._.�..__:—�---r._---a ; �__...�j�.1__. ' __ .. ; � i � ; � ; � . � , . _.. � �-. - ---f- ,--+---t- � - __ _ -- - � � � PR� - ._._,,...__ .�....__�_ r ..--- , ; - _ . ; � : . , , , - ;----7 ,- . �_��p, . ; �2 jc; �°_;�. � ; 1 _ - .. , � .._.. ._T_...� —,__—��__.f____.r—__._.._ _ r' _ :..---�i-__._----....;._—I —r--_ 1-- _ _ , . � �-1��4�� '.��..��.�5�� ' � -~ � ! � i —1 --�..j�- - ��i/R.li[i!.1L+ !'r� �a/' �t ;_ ...`. ; _._i ._ � .h_. .� � .T' � - � . J_i�r _�_._� — .� i . . , ' ' �. ; ; '. ' ' . � ��' � ' - � � . � � \�' �p7 �' � ' � T � � -r.. . G-� u� "' - . . Iy� I - '_��GY".�"" _ �'. "__"'1"'....f.. � ._ � �.._ _'_ "__� . ". .._ _ ..� + ; 1 I �..�.. , .� I�I �i--—i.�. .A�.1��_ti..l-1-�-Sa4el.a.l_.�}L�..��.1i� _�E�.I 11.L..� ...._�..._�.—_}.. . �_ � . ' �. : , i , � � � , I i .- , ; -- � - � •r---j-- .�.�., � � ! � , � + i � � -- - - — .. �_ ��,.__�.__�....—. ...�----�-- � --�—��_.;. � � �_.�_.i� � ---�--- �--•- -- - ' ,�=-. �a�. =fi�—�, ; �� -- -�;_ :'��;�—i—�— -�--- - ' -,; _ � _ _. �_ �, ., { �_ --�- .- , _�_ . .__ � _.�.�___�._ � , �. _.�....�- I a..l._..'�__,.__._+_� �.. I -._.__..' i...___+_ � � ' I i I j , 5420 SW Macodam __ ! . _ _�...�� T�' � .. F�[L+� __,T-�-i.--.i --{ �� ' ��!� �� ' Suue 360 I � � , � � �� ; ��-- � , � �- � , 'onlc►rd, OR 97201 -_ � __.�.._...�_� � ��. �. � .- - ._.,_,_ . _ __._.,(._.. , ---�-�.— � �i �o t .�_+_ _-�____�--�...._�...._.i.� , i r I I '..-- ---� ...� • Y-.�y FAX 50.3r168-3929 _��L�I_�_r�,�� ..�...'_1rr/� ��1., � �.�. _ —� ._.; 503/768-3930 ` , � ' ' ' ' i ` ' �! I I ' � � `�TC�1�I i - �• --- _ . . . i i { I � I i I i i � �� --- � � I ' 301 4� ^v�� . / , .�`--� h �` � s4o ' '� ti 1 s�9 3e w ` �. � N je�w � '�.833 �,s �C//� \ TH1S MAP iS FURNISHEO AS A � , 4y� I 2 0(�so � " � � 4 0 2� CONVENfENCE BV: o s� ,,,� 34 Q�. � / S� " � STEWART TITL^ ^ / �I MAP 13 NpT A SURVEY AN� DOES NOT eti � � � \ 3MOYV THE LOCATlON OF ANY IMpfipyEqqEN7S. � 2 qry � DO ��o � THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO UABILI'iY FOR q ERRORS THEAEtN. �� `' � o �`�Op 6s ' �� MAP � _ .�� 1C�--� 5 /� ss *9 1 � 6,a�., � 4o3e� O s J'o6 Ji �e,� � \� �Q /��o ,�'tis •w 3 w !200 'o• �" ; .�' � � °0 � s �40• � �y F ti � c, S 2 s .�2 Ac �;� �3O �?s9 �� c ' e ch� a�o .�,� � �S s r(�� o �o� 4� � O� �7 ^ ��. �°•�� -c� /�� 0 ry �� .I25 Ac. ,oes� �oo c is � � � � \ / ti � �� '� �� I (� s� �� so a u y� ,,sl3 ,3O ��,• �� ,�p / �� qc �,\ � i9�Q Ss� 'c'�42 ``' c �STe �S � "e� � �� 4p. 9� � � �� w �'� o k; ,��, �� -_� 4' � � '�-- ��1 �� p� � � �: o� �S 3,6 s, � J �� v„ S 3o qs O�y ,60 � +�s / /�9 B S4 o O's I 8 v��`/ �' 6 � � / 1, �0 /e �pO c�' 2, S,O /? O2 / '!, G o, v� �� f � � � �� a ,y q,� 9vsy ,`P0 /� � Gr \ 4 •i�� \ 6� �� • 3 q� � � � �'P b /1 � I � '�o `� `n r_r ti ��3� V s�o y 4�, �` �� SEE M�sP � jj2S I 2PD ' 4�4S Gr k � j/ cy ti 6'a�►' 1 I V E-i� � � _ su nse �,Fl� FUEL COMPANY ��E m 29a4 S.E. POWELL BLVO. • P,O. BOX 42287 •PORTLAND, OR 97242-0287•(5031 23a 0511 • i-800-878-1285• FAX (503) 234-0380 .luly 25, 1997 Rev. Leslie M. Sieg Pastor - St. Anthony Church 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 De2r Father Sieg, As legal owner of the praperty described as the Tax Lot �S12B8-01700 idcated at 1 2515 �W Gr�nt Avenue in Tigard, �regvn, I give my pe�mission for the church to apply for a conditional use permit fpr the purposes of dev�loping the property into a church parking lot. Sincerely, � J rry J. ies n resident : STEWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. - C'QSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTbiENT PHONE 671-0525; NITE OWL 671-0535 = M E T R 0 S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R 0 F I L E _ Washington County *******�r**************�r*�r�r***********************�r******,r**********�r**********,r* * _____________________ * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * _____________________ * * Reference Parcel #:2S102BB 01700 * * Parcel Number :R0463233 TRSQ:02S-01W-02-NW NW * * Owner :SUNSET FUEL COMPANY * * CoOwner . * * Site Address :12515 SW GR.ANT AVE TIGARD 97223 * * Mail Address :2944 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND OR 97202 * * Telephone :Owner 503-234-0611 Tenant 503-620-7725 * "" __________________________ * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * "" __________________________ * * Transferred: Loan Amount . * * Document # :78046069 Lender . * * Sale Price : $85, 000 Loan Tyrpe * * Deed Z�pe . Interest Rate: * � * % Owned . Vesting Type : * * ______________________________ * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * ______________________________ * * Land :$43,760 Exempt Amount: * * Structure :$74,720 Exempt Type . * * Other . % Improved : 63 * � * Total :$118,480 Levy Code : 02374 * * 96-97Taxes:$1, 613 .11 School Dist :TIGARD * * ____________________ * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * ____________________ * * Map Grid:655 E4 Class Code: * * Census :Tract 319 .03 Block 4 * * NbrhdCd :Y2T Mi1lRate :13 . 6149 * * Sub/Plat: * * Land Use:2312 MISC,NON-MFG, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE * * Legal :ACRES .52 * * * * � * * ________________________ * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * ________________________ * * Bedrooms . Lot Acres : .52 Year Built : * * Bathrooms . Lot SqFt :22, 651 EffYearBlt : * * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * * Pool . BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : * * Appliances : BsmLowSF . Roof Shape : * * Dishwasher : Bldg SqFt : Roof Matl . * * Hood Fan . 1stFlrSqFt: InteriorMat: * * Deck . UpperFlSF : Paving Matl : * * Garage �rpe: Porch SqFt: Const Type : * * Garage SF . Attic SqFt: Ext Finish : * * Deck SqFt : * *�**************,��r,r�r***************************************,�********,�*********** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ---��'� - - -- ..,. � . .,._ ,, . . .,-..'+wn,.rn..�R.ft�:s`i�rt..»=.a;°.n;M.+.,.�.ptuv�•rr�wr..:��r�a++,. �� ..,.er•:.•-., .,t..,� >na..- ,.,,wzw+. ti �� . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . _ . .... . �n�F , ., ,-+jr ''' . . . .. . . . . . . . . �� t � � � , � . ��.'��Ti'1.w..t . . . e 'S7 �, :i`5,. .,. _ �r ., , ✓-. ... _..,.; . .. ' �Y? ... � . �"`=�....c�.:�"'�,�.r°_�.,°g►�''~ ........... ..�.�Q��4�.9 � �---,�--_.._ _ _... . � ;+ �.M..a�.►..,. ". � � TNIS QOl�IT1t�Ct Mrr Mr._..__..16th.._.................e.r d... OCiob�r .1�78 .y.e.,,,,.� t' F , �Mi�....6tiT��P..B�.��.....��.,.,....l�a...Q�.�Qan..aa�r�c.�a.��on..._eucce�aor. bY_seaaon ol... '�, I ��.lSVf�QiY.lR.F.91l�a.,..CSt..!tl�l��,lR...Q��....C.R!RlnY.......... a" �I a(tM Cw�tr d... .....lI�11Lil��.__.............and San d . Or�qOt1 Mrw,rl+.�ufkd t!r � �� 0�. �Mlr�� n1_..�67.{'l�.�i'...N�,Te_.�9. ; :, ..._..._........_...._...._......_...._............ _ ___. ...... ...... .. .. ... _. r oune� �� 1 �' a;s _, ! d._.._...........�tl.�t�lO�11Ah.._..._....... _....nd sru.d OTeqoi� _hsrdnrn.uN.�d rA.b,r.r. � b�s I A77'NLSSiTX.TA�f in ew�r�tion a/�M pip�lNionr An�in rnnt�ind�nd rM �• �+.�;;g . �� MYmrnn ro 6�md�N � i � • j, y ;, .tM MfNr hnA�yr�w eo alf rd Nr bvy�r a�nr,ro pur�.h�r.t!r IoUowrry d«c�nbd nd : , - �, ..�.i..r'nrr.in u.Cwawr d_..........._M��h�!?,4t�Qd#...... ...... .S�.n d....... ...P.r�.99.0........ ......... .ra.re: . �. � 4 a�ginning at Lh� mwL North�rly wrn�r of Lot 18, North Tigardvills " ,,�, � t�.� .,;��, p ]lddition, in Naahinqton Couniy, Or�qonr running �henca South 35' S9' . "` ��,N�st 71.52 leet to an imn pip�� thenc� South 5�• 40' Eaat 309.75 faet ! �?,-;'�.`- � Lo an iron pip�j thenc� coatiauinq South 5{• �0' 8aat 20 feat to the '•"y'r,:'w. � �� c�ai�r of Grant Stre�tt th�nc� North 39• S3' La�t along ihe centar line , ;r��+%:; I� � o! Grant Straat 88.11 i��tr thence North 57• 10' Nest 20 feet to an x � iroa pip�t th�nce continuinq North 57• {0' West 316.�6 feet to an iron r ,� .. ., •;-� �. b!il pip� at th� moat North�rly cornar of said Lot 18t North Tigardville + r`;.�.. qp ,� 7ldditioa, sub •ct to th� ri hts of th• ublic in and to an ± �• � � �er�in da�crib�d r�al prop�rty lying vithfn the boundsriesYo�gtiwn G=��e } - , venue. ' :.�;.'`;',, �I /or fM wrm W.1�i�Yll.f.�...1!'.1VA...'�.'�Q.{i�AlAfl��.�_._._.______�_________-�__Do!!�n(1.�.�.a.Q.QQ.r.00 � ,`'s• . 1�; on�000un d which Flfteen Thousand---------------�---------- 115�000. .............. .. .. .: ,_,.. ' � ..........._........................ .........................................................._..........._._.Do1l�n ( ........ ......._......) � �' �l1 ': i�p�id on tM�mvtion Mnd(tM nnipt d whrch i�herebY�+w�1d/ed by eM�s!!er).�nd�M rcm�ind�r fo b� r �j j p�id fo fM ord�r d t!w s�lhr with irM�rnt�e tM nh ol......1.0.....p�r nnt per�nnum Irom...00L.Q.U.f:,C....�,6........., , ��!��;� �, l9..Z8....,an t1w d�fa�rd!n�movnn��lollowc _ ':��` °'' Th� sum o! Tsa Thou�and Dollara (510,000.00) plu■ accrued intereat "�"�"'�t 'I ihall b� paid on each of the followinq dates: October i, 1979, ; �:,��,;;�� • • i October 1, 1980, October 1, 1981, October l, 1982, Octoher 1, 1983, � Octobsr l, 1984, and Octobar 1, 1985. From and after January 1, 1979, � :tfi�,�,,�r 8uy�r �hall haw the riqht to prapay the whole or nny part of the balanca ; � th�n due without penalty. y ��•{�'-f�� 1 . I r ), � �J. � _ . . .. . ae�t � ,,,,�'�-«��w...}�r Mi.`i` ��;^�:��: .. . � �� -4 �s.: -,T I ��"°�3 .�b .A��- � �' � � s.� � t _ r�! �� , ' �� i: I l�,. 4i� �.� , , '.4' i }. _�s�,^ � j�� •� .;�S-0Q � � �'k�� i �i-+-��w,� � � . 7 :."" �! 4M �m,�W S,R�c '��-.��f;—#.�1'F:��:t;•�E ^?t'�jl"' +t , �� a c-d��"i�'K!; _s1 't4 ..:1;- i�_ , ...., _ . `� � `",°'s �,"`�'��'' : t 'r r � "' rb�.r...�.r r..1 w..�rr.r r...rw rr r rr . ¢� , ��''�':��:�'�-: �+.w.a/.�r.1 Y�ar�r• F� ;�';:.;� rp r.� "�°'....., ��.�. �' �/MY'IY�(�Y�Y�wlw+i 1�!Y Ar�I��rw+Yl�wir w�.Mw�1��l�w�� .'.'Y•��l �• �. r,.�r r.�...r r r.�+.r a.r�.�..+w.....«....�.r�w....e r.+r.r rr�+.�.rr+..�w...+r.r.r.�.��+.. . " V°r°.c 4"�qt*fi' ��1�/�r 1��Wl�/��ii1�/�tl�1Y wr/iwiM�r�M/�w/�►��Iw�1wAM�bM��ww YY/r+/M�W l�M�I � i' I�-.�.ly} 'ti,]" ��• /� �r��y�r w I�Mr�Y�nrw M/Iw,Yr M�W MI J r/rwww�w�wrr�1.��1 r M��1 N�ull.r . � ' � �w i��uY wiiw��w��ww�w�M�F�W��w W�r '��v�w�•�M� M�11w I ��; ��r��y M/�,�Y��l��w�11��AN Y�w�w�/�w�ILrr YW��wf.YI�w Y r�wM��N 1M M�+� �t ,r.�.','.S'��;. : ��Oi 3Ilt1iT�1� R11N fCwiAw/M n.ww1 ;` ..`�'.�`l;� f�t.�-. F •��1�F�Y��■i��Wwu��N'�W,�wwr�W-r Y rl WrM M w�.r�W Y�Y�//r dYr Y �� :s�a.t' � w�w��r�w r�.rr a,r w�M�1� Ar w M�/hwhilM�M�y w�w� ► : ,y�a � �/7w�.w Ywr�Ir�Nr Il�M�w��r rr M Y��4 IIA w li��M�w��M��My r�wr�� . .� : M.IA r W1iw � � .� �� %:;:��..'��. � - ss�r�' r!, i � o;_/Cat.Yt+9=Y... _ STAlS OP OREGOH. � �.h s�";"� �� s:��r , , � � a. . �, ee.., ..a�w ,�,ee..�r:��..:n,i:...�:.... ..... � � � . , ,p;. Cwne d .�'"�•, � L,{YqM�7Wl CO. � l artiy Md R'S�n:tAM hrtru- ! �jf"r P��Y=T'Y�gfywll'f163._�� _ _ awr w�no�lnd for noo�d an tlr � � ;�; F - '�i.,'��r,�72C2__._ _ _ .. 1l..... .. �,� ` 4 � N d�xt....J1f.,d rreordd t wn.r�w.w.r....�■ �� • ,•. �►ra wM�vw , � �� in booR. . .. . an pyt.._. _ w� I � y�' 4 ..,. •�r . . �4 te ' 'aY: r e..n��r....� x � . •~ lM�� Z � ,' .,. y .. . . �O�M�'�VN .... ... .... .. . .....� � � �1 �� I � �.c 'S � " �� ,._— ��w��ylN�r� a�f � rrd d � .k� � 'A�� la � ..� r'w��/tfY�V. 'Z�' � 'ly ;4'Y�i1P��P1/�Mwy��YwY��a '\y,�'"??` � �Y y.� :�i 3�. +r . .. R10�N� �� =p`g � i� .��.' ,r�� 3-_ - , , �;,. ;. ¢� .. . ; .. �, ' &'��... !i+w�M�9J4 +!"P054C �1:9++ .�.�SiA AOJY••w:.. . . '' __----_�_��.. . . . . .�__ � ;. a ' . v ni• . ... , ., �',s��':Y7'+q.�?„ , . � � ��°�c �� (' . ' . E . .M 4,. M y,l ��. � � k.�n�r S .., ,�r] S['�•�;�e i��: ��`��P� . •'4, � � . . _.. .. . . ��, .. ..� � � .. ' ' � . . .k�"�?r.a..w..y .. .- . � . .,��. . . � ... . , . . . ' , . � .� . .+ ; . .. , . . .. .,: -. t�s . . _ . . � .� -� . . . .:.. . .�..v,.. -. . .;,a. .� . . :. . ,. . �,� '�,r,q . ��'4y'.?.'�"��'�ib`�zi,'s��.�tk.£F.;$�t�h'i.f,+4'.�t?r �.K�.,fii;'�"u.. .,., s' ,x.�:�a�. .��-�,j k. . . . 'Y.'�' , -;� , -s „ . ��.,r . ... � i"... � . � _ , �� M �i� -� '�.. ��ri1�? � ' :i�: � , •• . . • -j' '� r.wwwr••f��+a,.•... �� 't� ��7 l�wea. Liol�ilN t#a�� !o rrR��nt� �a tM ht�. ot u�ltiw � . •' iI .,�-��M�2_W eM �est�___�� 4i�.!�!�lS�!�#11�_�sR..!uq.l�s�c�on Pt.usec. �`� � - -Q— �..: .� +�rr ' '�': �� ;I ^�_�,,,,,�r,��,,��..,. 1 S ..��.............,...._..............r... t'-� , '�� r.�'rn wr�r w�.�w►�r�.r..rr��r..w.r��.r�.r.r.r..r � 4p�y;..i Pw �I w w�.r.d�..+i.r Y�wi .�w`.d.....w�.r w��.�w .r.��.rr.�.r�'..r� :,��..s� ��. 1�...� r.r.r.��.r....�•��r.r ww.. wrra� «r.�..�.��r..�..�w.�.r + � ��M��.r..wn�.r..w,r.�i'r�••r�w►w w r r�...r.�...�..��r.rrr r. � �'"`r.,•" Art.• �r,r�..r�.+w�.y.�r..r..�+.�"d nn....r r.r... wr+l a..�_�,,,{.,,�0 �y 1 . ;J. . �r r� ....wi b r.w.. �.�►► �Ib �YD � �`2'.' �r�a�'r.7�w.��"'+�y.�'�""r"'.�...��J.r.�`'.r..r�,..+, . . +v.�«:�..�'1�"+..'�"'�.�"�rr , �t�`.� /�.�P��Y r/�Y��1 Y��r�4 w�(11 w�.Y� �L../rw��.r+��W��r r.. �.w,r r.... ��.w�_, f�ti._:.�. ! w1 rw� ..ry�r..�i.Yr r b....i».�wrww.~i.�.i:.tii�wr�..w.�r.�r. ..�r�w+.....� r.r.�.r w w�. � (�, +� .t'!;,,.i.,�. 1 r�ib.�ir�.�.r..��.�ir,�+r.,o�.rw...�+.wn..�.n r.�...��...�".►��.�.` rw.�'r�...,'r',��:.i..�„�„++w ', "�. . , � �r f�.��.M. �'�ti r r,.w..��w�+wrr nw wI w�r+b��er.�.�r�w�...w. l l.)� w/+r..r.n.rr..rr.r��.w�+..r..w�.r r�w+•�.r�.,r.•h r.w.�� r+��+..w..,.0.��+.rw�r�. ' �w��wbw�/�M I�iV A� w•w�~�YI�w.�1��r.N.�rs A...r 4.�IZ MM w b�.�M r��r�.� � � ' � � ��1��+��4�Y oth�s ps�o�l�io� Mrwl. ta d:[au!! �hall b� d�cl�ayA IrrNUid�r unl�s� " ' Nll�e �Aail 1ww iir�t qiryn Euyae vrletu� noeic� �t tA� �ddr��s Nt lorch in tl�i• � ' ,+',j . � ooetsaat 8�4111n v�tA r�awn�bl� •i,�: j 9 p�rticu.,...�y th� natur� of tlr� d�lault, and buy�r " sh�u Aaw la11�d to cur� tJN Mfault vithin twnty (20) day� ot r�c�lpt o! tM vritt�a v3�_ � { notl�'�.r�.r.�r.r.rr r rr r�r...w w....r wr�.r�99.000.00 . � � y � �r r�r��.r r rrr.r�.r.w.+�.wr.r..r � .f �. . .�....�M.w�w.� •wr..w Awr r.�.M.w+V I�+r b�r�/1�ri.�I.n r rr � I �Iw�w��My�r�I'�1��w Mw�/1��'��1��Y�rY�i��wr r/y��Y i Y�Y�w � � /+��Y41//�� ww�1' A��i�W`•Wi All��Mf��w/4 r��W�yb w��rW��r4 n�w �..�.'��: . I�wwr�YY�Yr.1 r w1�w�/Y�1 IM r1 r�w r�M!+��y��M�MY��r Mal Y 1v�� r�+�—/�r��.d iMd.W/A.�4 W�r.�.M.�...Yr r W.www.�raM IM.w��11��ry�f M_i� +.wr.�.r..+.+r..a..r.�s.�..�r r...�.r.r r rr.r.► ��1wA�iyY�Vr�►��W~��w��YI r.`�Yrl��i w�I. ~�M'fM Y�Y�M�M��w.M'YY r�lw YY� 1' � � � rn wtrnass �►xaresor,.:a r•�*:.r�....�,+�.e�n�.r�.e�„�.�r��a��.n;;�«rh...r�eM.ynr�.. , j ��; �/n�d l��aorper�eion,it Ar ewwd iti aorr«rn irar w b�d/nd �bf ee�d- - �+wn�Wly MMAa�ia�d tMw�MO b�a�/r d ib Lour d a+�cfoew � :3 .&Y.�'ir�...��.�..CQ.............. ._. . ....... ..... . H�� RI � INC. ' S�S �. • 't`. Hy ��!'!'.. . .. G. ' rr� .�...President ............... ! ........._.........P � id�nt.._.?rl.. a...E....Mi�s�r► • ' }�j , � ; �. r•sx.... . T.,l�-r�r.........._...._................._.. t�: �w.,:G�� ete � ,�,a�M� ��p�Richa d T. Narrit.-S Se11s� srwrs or oeioow. i '. ' 1 STAT6 OF OR600N,Cw�t�ef Multnomah �e. 1:.;�: �...s r.............. >" October 16. ,» 7B ' _....... _ ) �' _ i� �w��,.,p..w Lloyd E. Mieaen. .7r. .�e i �:,. ..............._........_............__ .{•.. . L. J. Mieaen .i,,,s.�„r r,,,,,..,,� � � j�. . ��l M/r.1 ar�bw�.r.I . ..rA�a.�r.�n w wee w eo.M.«�...�rr.q xnr er.rrww i.eA. �� ; . ? i' . ......__. .�I.�M... . _ .. � r jluu.;.el�. �' � .. . _... . ... ..... P+rd�/d tAN a . .... ..._..... . , ` � � - �o.t W $IlII L I' k .:-. �' � �' �� w4./xr�a,p.r,f hr... Fuel Co. . e,�..uw �� ., . .�, ° �� . �. ' .` , „�•y ,',i wr�e I��... .... v�An+�rs r.,r�..�. �►«:L�.n+..rw.1r Nw w rn.n.m�M w r1��L�.rr M.�.-.. I � .:�. • � i- ,� AJ(d ri1 ovlwlion b/�fAeriry W ih 6er1 M�innv�:r/�sA�t., � . �.'� ' 1�rh/�w: rNw ��ne.�N/W/I� L.nv�e te A� !n sW�n�r�'�eI d i�d.••.7,, -�F ,. r.� ;�� forrrG,u. ..... .. . . _ . . ..... . . i�� Q i``I Y -,_ � � t�. j. .. �,� S6ALJ . .. L:/ . /��,�� `. � �fOFIfG.tL � � ' .zop: . ;. . .; ' Hwr7 hMN/r Qrya� Na�rf'/rMk fer OrNm � � StA(�• i � �-� � r�<; „ �, ^'i'. 4 ;. Ms�r�Al�v�Mw ..._....... .. . Mr oarrni�iew r.rMN: 3rw� . /7 /!f �- • � •.� ��• 'i � �f s,J�.�� . J � .: L.,.-r','�c , • � � ,..�;:: � ;i r ° �" �r...�r��i�.a+�M r""��{�'M'w.r�'�'�i...rrr�'�'�:.«.��..�.w �.�r.n��r.r..rr w r.sr I' � . .a;,.,��':. ;� •� w•.�.��.1�.r.�Y w...�i 4 1�. ��r w .t u.uu.r b w. . . "t �w�l��. •..•.....rr.u..ur�.wwr.��'w�w.r�r... I. '�Y{.� � �LM Il)thYl�d OL N.N{Y wYYir.A�r�bllw�y�flw M rt��IM�pM I��`�-I 5'�: T�° . �I i, s.aw STJ►TS a� oASGON. Cwnty of Multnomah ) •�. October 16 , 19�8 �°�� '�'� �� ,' � _�;z,r�t'�„�'Y:: '^ I P�r�onallY �PP�rb G. R. SARRZ3 and BICHARD T. HAR_RIS rlw. �,:ti��9ps, R�+ � b�1a9 dn1Y aron►. ��ch tor hSti�lf aad aot on� far th� oth�r, did uy that th� fosfrr �s '-�`r-� th� prpid�at ana that th� latt�s it eM '�`f*ka'Y` �iµ ��cr�tasr o! A1LAR28 EIiTERDRI3fiS Ih'C , a rnrpozatioa, u�d tAat th� ��1 a!lix�C to th� lorpolaq �"'� i°�t=�°t rat si9n�d and ��al�d in Mlul! of �aiC oorporatioa Dy auehority o! ib boarQ . ; ',��,�i��,'•+� o! dir+a0or�t ud wch of thN ackaorlW • '�. ��,g•c a�0i 9�d �aid in�tr�e►t �o b� !t� �oluntarr acL aaA. • ,'x�� /� •„k,�k � >fl�Ol"�r� � �..�Y � _ _ • . .. �'�`Aaei:� �� lob110 LO! � � y �n (0!!'ICIAL /E71L!'.� 'Y'�� ; ,�_ NY Oo�al��lo0 O�tlwt �+�,...- �7„/JT�- ,,.�.. i < <TAfl0I0M�011 � M�� h�',i � f.CwrldMl�Y��o.., . ._._._.._ �!. 1 y 1 L � T�!"�� r O�I► . , � ,3 Y $�� f� �'�� * .!p ( N . ii �iS�. .� � � T Ii �'� � rti ;�ryt;;�`: -.;.',.� , �1- :� �v � .. . I �r;i � q�oex�o� ,: ...�.. � + �;�;�. ;"i� 'tiyic:.,� x��,;k'rc,'t��t:,�. . �.'_----� _ �_--- =-_:-�� F✓ ��=:�`��-, ,.. �. � ,,,:� ,,�e� � y., " �, w' .�� 1 STEWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. - CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT PHONE 671-0525; NITE OWL 671-0535 = M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R 0 F I L E _ Washington County *,t***********,t*****w***,t***************w**w********,t,t**********�r�******,t*******,� '�` _____===:.a�====_____ * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * _____________________ * * Reference Parcel #:2S102BB 01600 * * Parcel Number :R0463224 TRSQ:02S-01W-02-NW NW * * Owner :ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF * * CoOwner :PORTLAND IN OREGON * * Site Address :9870 SW JOI�1'SON ST TIGARD 97223 * * Mail Address :2838 E BURNSIDE ST PORTLAND OR 97214 * * Telephone :Owner Tenant * '� __________________________ * * SALES AND LOAN INFORbiATION * * __________________________ * * Transferred: Loan Amount . * * Document # :CF4036 Lender . * * Sale Price : Loan Z�rpe . * * Deed 'i�rpe . Interest Rate: * * % Owned . Vesting �rpe : * * ______________________________ * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * ==a=�===o_____________________ * * Land : $70, 000 Exempt Amount: * * Structure : Exempt Z�rpe :EXEblPT * * Other . % Improved . * * Total :$70, 000 Levy Code : 02374 * * 96-97Taxes: School Dist :TIGARD * * ____________________ * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * -------------------- * -------------------- * Map Grid:655 E4 Class Code: * * Census :Tract 319 .03 Block 4 * * NbrhdCd :CDRH Mi1lRate :13 .6149 * * Sub/Plat: * * Land IIse: 9602 SOC,RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION * * Legal :ACRES .58, NON-ASSESSABLE * * * * � * * • ________________________ * * PROPERTY CFiARACTERISTICS * * ________________________ * * Bedrooms . Lot Acres : .58 Year Built : * * Bathrooms . Lot SqFt :25,264 EffYearBlt : * * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * * Pool . BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : * * Appliances : BsmLowSF . Roof Shape : * * Dishwasher : Bldg SqFt : Roof Matl . * * Hood Fan . istFlrSqFt: InteriorMat: * * Deck . UpperFlSF : Paving Matl: * * Garage Type: Porch SqFt: Const Type : * * Garage SF . Attic SqFt: Ext Finish : * * Deck SqFt : * **********************************�*****************�***,�****,r,�***************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. �I OS/O1/97 FRI 16:44 FA% 503 64� 416 STEwART TITLE C�002 '., — . T�:.'�''�i•?r4'�{-.�r�:�y ':r}'.i;1a�L • . .� . �� c•. c. 5�G'y'Y�� _ .ur.w.c,tiu.o�... ..,,,yi �;- �+ �or:a n. U)--W�O�rR DiiG — 5� ' _'_' � •.n ��.' �� _` I 1{NOW ALL MEN BY TXESE rRESE1I�TS, That ser.. �sltet.N.••�lob�r...s�d • • -°'� I . �,� ;rlorenco J. We"oer� husbaad siui �riEr .._ . . ii .� � �herrin.fter callcd th�grantor, 1 i r"� - - - - - .. � ^ � - - - � Aollara, it . ^=—"�' in wnuder�rion of Teu and ao�100 - - - - - ' r ' � i: '^..--+,:'� a.:G o�?�.9r good and valczLlc consideratiocs i� z- .. ' �� to L�nneor Pmd by n.:I^a�c`es•� eS �.'�PT'�ZZ'1�. �!1 �L'3p0II.. . . .� �, � • • ,' ;,:� .heroinaf ter callrJ el+c grantec. 'i —--- .� �<< _� �-,,: ' �s � - '� • , Jorr h�,e�y grent, ba�kain. �d1 an.i eonyeY ++++�a �h� seid q►ancae and grant�e's heirs ond asai�ns, rhae i� - . _ esre�in raw!aroperty, witFt the !enemen:�.hcredrtamerifs arr.l apPurcenancrs thtreunro be/onqinQ or appee- ;I _ . - j"7� toining.uruared�n t1�e Swee o!OroQon ar�d the councl• th:�e;n nemcd bdow,deruibad as/dfows,lo.w;r. �! �.r �' �.iJj . ,,: �,.a ,o Q,rs�xied 2ar nf �oTth r;e.,r!vi110 Addition. `i11 •� • �'�-�• ,. rart ♦._ _ s /�� i �!� d:�o:iba� z:, f ellowa t �� 7e,°�"� ,�:ir'LLl1�Ybi• VvVi.�� Na6{'JII� hul'� �1 V�ri1lwZ�y � �" •—' �.,.•+--:r -: t!tie most ea.terly cc�rner o£ sai.d lo� ].9; thenc� nortl:- .:,-•... ,g .. _;,� lot 27$ ' , '-%^ -�,��:ly al a�� tlne northeastcrly 1 ir.. o: -• , _ -, � • ��+?. more or IESS to the nr�theastPrly " cer:.�: o= tF�at cortain :,� � . �: _._.,,,� ..: i....( �nrww:.�A t�+ rlicr�r� \'. '.'a�rar� at :tx� bv dAeo Tr...ta^.�.eid . .._-- "., 1951, � de9d book 320 �aEa 2b:s tt.enca so�:ther2y, alond the � � - ° zo�tha�a;Arly l:ne uL said ':oyer tract to t`� so�tirc�a:t corn�r � -=- �,. ��;�. - - �;.:�i- 'jr'� `.�::�o� lot� 3� a•^•c =i � —r.1 :-�reCi', s3id ,.a-••L - e C.. ha •-Z �i'i;,__�••,j_,j� c: sa+d aZdition; :heace aou'thessterrly along tne ssid dividin� lina d ' �'" °� �oL:fean sa:d lots 19 and 19, to tne south3a�terlv carner oi said ^ _ .. .._�=':� ].�t i?; t�'.4�C6 nortY_asCurly along th� southeast9r;y line o: said Iot 19, w�Y��.�a ,-� '� . . � LC '.fd ,�iaCr. oT CNa��'Lt�ir�r',. � . . �r,r,f��ecC �_ Y: � -�L'� . . ,��`�.�'�� - �1ibr'rFa".^�,ryL� � �" ��1 Li�6'"`.2'Gil.l�.� :�r . �_-' �p�� Tu lfo�� :+nd rr•Hold!he aM�'r dr.cribrd ar.B�rin«d p►�mi.�r wrrc thr�id Qra��e�and gr�ntce s � ��'� ��_+ heiec nnd.�•i�^•l.�-��rr. , � And <e�d �C/nntor�rr6y er.vrnnnf� rn and�c�eh �'rrd L�•��tt�� and qrenfe�� h�in nnd easr!»r, tha[ ' - . �+iar.n.r i, l��vlully xi7od Ifl�CY' �7Tplr q! rh�nAw'e qr,nr�d prrme.e�,:rer lre�n aJl eneunib�ancrs i �:'.•�;'.:r;; r_;,:W aC the publ ic _h a;,•9 to ac,y porti�n t'.srpoi lyinG ? � � -i;,.:•, ':�� u.^.dariP9 u" road^ o�ul hig4x:.yy. .r rn . - �'�`�S� � , r, r�nd rh�r ilr,nrur K•i!!�,� �'�-_ �.. .n�.F.?v� ^I�rtMr'< .rrr�. ^r+cub�rs M�1 ddm�ni•.'�af�r� !helf N•a�rar,r nnd lorr�,e`r r/.•frrn!�hr�ho:•P C►��tud p:.•rtu!.e•. ��t�;�.�c�;;. �r�r/ i�.ry p.�st and pnrc�l rlirr.pl n,Q.�imf II��• JawIU� �'1:.:��.. .ind d.•m:�od• n! nN /rr.�uA.� Whomwrver. K+� r� �� .. In wnsttiin8 eh;a deed and wher�the rnnrrzt so:cqu;re�.eler Hn�ulnr indudea eh�•P/uraJ. . ky, �i11THESS g�anto�i 7`+�nd and eeal this dtly oi ��"t - , !9 63 . .� '�:;,��.,<',�,��-I � i �'��:aY' • G�r� ��G-�.�µ�_-.(S�,L) �I �� - ,, � , . ��, �/�_'r%/tL \ i -.1.�::L� (S¢wr.) 1� ' �,,;� •� (Sr.�s.) �I � n (.SRAL� �� i , ` � $7A?E OF CR.°.GON, Cov�t,oF )n. AIL�'LL9t r '• ' . !9 6j `• �� P«�orw!!r•v��r•''-��`c�°meQ :�5.►`r6r Z:� ��G�•= 1TId Flororee J• �ObC�� .... �� •�• . 'r.us�ac�d and �if e . .. ... . �� ond acknowL,i�ed t1+e ioregan�inst�un.«�.to be th83.i' vduntorr ae!and deed. I i ' ' - • .. Berore ra: �i - _' /;f.i ..' .' ' . • 'i_, , , I I .� ' • � �'' � Notary Publie(or Orc�on I I , . . . - �$EAL) � �1 COIA/►rssiOn etplfN... � , •.• .... : ` —� -� ,I - 11 � � � '�I 4�R�T�� DEE�j� . , _,. " 3 I . til�iruPG11�:=''�. f �. RN�tA� � .n r � , .... vwm..� x'?�'y"'• '• - _ �.+ :�,,t.._ *:. lfab��..z�..�ac_..�. � •�..'...,.�� : =_,. , .,,�, - � ;.i.. I� ..1N ��.awd fsO�fMe ..... ^� ........�...__........__..___ i e 7ne1M+�+e•CMuN a.sY - . ... ..... . ......... R4�' ��:i•Ioanry'...0 .� 1' F�- � 11.avrNr o(Gn^:.fanew M a�„rl�e,a �'d II � ��nM M �.��. �/Y� , .; �' , I� __- _ to�r v�e�wr� ew��Y' � � . ...�::' ,=,3�'�Ti4.N0_.A��O��e��... �MCC��oswvro tete..�ru�� '" � .•�/�/. _i I • su �ue�o��o g�d�.t � :'0�Or1. u�e� �w aov�. �n�!e � � •'. . : , -_-z � �" ' �y�ar•�:...��. . � ,.r: �i II ................ . ......._...........--'—__..••--�•'--- tes�wMr� � . , . i - I' ,• ` r �iTU+rl[COIIDIN6 11[TYIlp 70 ' Y1N.� N nd n!O1�°�Ri�d' �` wun.�. �r��',R�,�.ca,.�r a..k - '� o I 1.°__=cca�c at Pa�tL�nd �Y —� _ • `� c 'n vrcgor.� „ ��°��a��r � - -� '`= I � r/. C't. 1��5�.H�1s 9�.i��, y^ {I � T�9rd, aro�an. • , � �� 1� � 4,95 eac� �4? ��►�� ,E�-��I�'6� -.��,-� ' `, �l -�_ .. Y ' Ms.,:,.-�aa:;aF+t. ' -''�b, .x'F��.��.':�. �'•- ,,;. . . �.�:,ui.�k�w7�vb.x:. _. __ • . . .. --�-� `� �� JUL-23-1997 08�08 FROM .,�CHDIOCESE 5�3-234-2a03 TO 62a2364 P.06 AFTER RECORDING RETURN T0: UNT�L A CHANGE IS REQUES'X'ED, ALL +� L TAX STATEMENT5 SHA�L 8E SENT TO: Roman Catho�ic Archbishop af � Roman C�tholic Archbishop o� port].and in Oregon� dna Portland in Oregon, �nd � G� succes�ors, a cvrporation sole succ�ssors. � corpora�ion sole �%'' c o 283b E. Burtl3id� S�r�.et 2838 E. Burnsid� �tre_t FQxtland, Oregan 97214 Fortland, Oragon 9'�214 9�'ATUTQ:RY 3P�CYAL WARRA3�ITY UEED Th� F'RANCiSC�N FATHERS Or CALIF�RN7CA, a cOxpOZatlaI'► organized under the laws of the State of California, Grantor, convey to The RoMAN CATHOLZC ARCHBISHOP OF PaRTLAND IN �REGON, and successors, a corporation �ola, �ran�ee, the fo�:lowing d�scribed r�al PxoP�rty: I. Lot Fif�y-vne (51) af North Tigaf�Qnta�ni g 1 1� acr s� more duly record�d map and plat ther�o or less. IT. ALL OF LQT !FIFTYMTWQ ��26 � ACR�STASTPERTHE �-M�NDEDTPLAT CONT�IINING ONE 2�/1 Q 0 ( ) THEREOF NaW ON RECORD IN TIiE OFFICE 4F RFCORDS FdR SAID C�UNTY P,ND STATE. THI S INSTRtJr;ENT WILL NOTA�IO�w �F�PpLI ABLE Z,AI�'p Y uD�SC�`BS D AND THIS IrtSTRUMENT IN VIOL THIS IN�TRUMENT, �'HE REGULATTON. BEFORE SIG�+TNG OR Ps,C�EP'rTNG PERSON ACQUIRXNG FEE �T�T�N�Y opLANNINGP DEPAR�MENT 'I'O� VERIFY NX APPROPRIA'TE CITY OFt � APPRQVED CTSES. . No monetary consider.ation has b�en paid for this conv�yance. DA'�LD this ��_ day of �'�:' .--�J" , 19�5 . F:ZAA3GZSCAN FA`i�iF..�� C)F CALIFG�ZIrrA � � �Y � � � �� L ,�t� � �.�r r�.z _. County o �'._: , STAT� OF ` � �7 ��r��is ��% day, aF " + `� , �99�, the persona7.ly app•� and acknowledged abova named �-�-��'-�''-��`��""'' th� fore9nin9 ln,trum�nt �.a be his voluntary act and deed. .r� / J � i � �4C�f!�C� � �_..��,,f--'2-'o t ��``�pFf►ca�!. �� No�y Pub11.c �or aregon � , � '��' q�}G� XASfI. M C4mmissidn Expires: %�� r+oYAaY pueuc-ar�aor� Y ��,,;� c��sM�s��ow��75�2��,�,7 r��,; ...o•4r„rs�a�a,i �c. .,„,,,�,.,.a. ,�r .,.,..�.r,......... JUL-23-1997 �8��9 FROM 2CHDIOCESE 503-234-2903 TD 6242364 P.07 STAT�QF QREG4N l �� County ct Washington j 1, Jerry R. Hanson, Direotor of Asgess- ment and Texatlan and �x-f�fflcio County Clerk tor sAtd county,do honeby aortify that the within instrument oi wrttinQ was received and recorded in book ot �conds of said cour�ty. ,`ll�'a'� C ' Jerry R Hanson, Director ot A3ses$ment aa�d Taxation,Ex- OffiCiO County Glerk DoC : 45080834 Rect: 153599 38. 0 11/021�995 03: 24: 57PM � , �� JUL-23-1997 08�09 FROM ;HDIOCESE 503-234-2903 TO 6242364 P.08 ST . ANTsH02�Y �YG.�T) Ivip,p �25 1 2 BD TL 100 1 . 32 AC . R ��15� R 46416Z 20Q 3 . 7.6 Ac . R 464I7� 201 . 96 Ac . R Ia79976 300 I . ZS Ac . R 464189 400 . 33 Ac . R 454198 800 .�4 Ac . R �6�276 �ti2AP #25 1 2 BH 1'L 1600 . 58 AC. R �63224 +i, • , ; � ��• •�4�i .. — ua��aJ.�� s�.l �.��,�t �: ..�r-t�� .,� P��r�Rr}7 T1� � �4�3�24. ?�.+ ��k-c;�i��a {R�ral. Frape:�y) L�J�f!.� �.'P'.X��'7�it.1:5^: ..`.i$�l. �;y�r�� jr� , yJi l i krnp C.l3g� ; �1��? Ac t::i�T.r7�'r�F l'1�' Pt7�TT.A�t� :�Pit�hbnr,hr-+�; t' ��,., W i T.., �.' :ANT�T�i�Y' ,, PAR.T.SIT Y�hr �u:� J t . • ��•:�0i ��J M�.K.�;�7,T.E 5T T.,i:�in� r�rpa � "��rr��fi, �]E �:)7223 S�a.P T';dte : �31E> Px t,�:P : �1�T15 . J��W til"1 �i)il�!iI�N 5T �c�a� m1p� • IttSt Ni:filuP_P : r�� r?a : 023.74 �x�u�pt i ons : 1�?-?3 ?rog�rty V�1 u�s Mari: I,�n��Pr: - trn�,rov�rn�nts � ca (+y Lar.� 5 S�,J4�i, r+, l��:ti3 T�}: S}at�as ' Tflr_�t .��s=,p�sQ�j � ;i�,r1a)� t=; CuNrent I�evi�� Tpx�x : 992.?1 E:t��r�pt:ans i �+ (�) SI�e�-t�1 F�s�essments . Taxabl� S 56,0t�v ;_) **� k�p T��.tes Due **� u�Yc�s� +.ha R:w,TiS�N k�y . _ _ n l,...i_... a�__....,i.. o_...,.,,a _ _ _ . . "� _......._.... ....,.-......-. _., .__..,,. . .....v.,. , .r. ... .... ... F��'.- 't'..a;; � JUL-23-1997 �8:07 FROM ZCHDIOCESE 503-234-2903 TO 6242364 P.04 Ld'1�j�iea� � � �.��ca �f «o�. :.a�,� . . . . ' . ' Pr��T,Ar�y iD a Fit?7��)7� :?St'�FO-4W?��? (Rva�l PrnpPrty) � Le��1 1'��►s�rri.ptic�n: .��tAC t�dN°A:+�F.�,aA.Pi,F NC!RTH TT�_A�iDVJI,�,R �MENDED FT Li±Ty 46-`i �7wr�P:^ IT: : 99�27 Fr�I, Cla�� . 9�:�a: F;�"i��7?f?s",��.E �7F FTJ.,x�, T':?F� �teir,hbarhno�3: WTi� f�? :�T �NTHON'!'S CHUrZG!-I YAax Aes:J.t . 1 it;75 4W FAf."��'TC HWY L�tvin7 Ax�+a ; �z�.�A��, o� ti�r�?� s�i� n��r : ii/F,,�� a.l� Pri.ce : �i..*..tt� . Op�:d Ty�� : XI'l5t �'If•1�P_F' : $�4)'xlctil Ga�� rlred ; �23.79; E�er��pti�n� . EX .19�13 Pre��ez^t_� t'�tug� !"c�rt T„=ndar: - Tm.�r�v�+mp�zt5 5 ti �+? Lar�� 5 1 (-rl i993 T�x S+.a�t�ta Tat3l Ass��e� y k� (_? Curr�nt I,e�+i�d T�:caR : C�.�+6 E;xempt tans 5 t� (-) � ��P�,ial ASSPSSmenl:s i T�xab�.e S F3 t=) *** t�ic� T'�:.�� Pue *** n�r��e�,s �:�� A.aTURi� k�!y : � TTrAOn �5p .;�'7�Sn'f q_ l -. r.�i� . a:�-.�.--+—�^'�_:._`.�:_se:_---r�n.-..�-w ...... , _._ -�.-.... . _„ _..,._. ...��wrmm�w�rrww+��rrr-.....�.+, .. . - _._......r.- -� JUL-23-199? 08�08 FROM �„<CHDIOCESE 503-234-2903 TO 6�a236� F.05 t'r�y.arr.v r r3 : R!i(4l r�1 2 S 12�D-�,�1?�Fj i RQa t. Prap�xt�) - . . , '. _ � Le�,��J ne�cri��tiqn: ACR�:: .3�, A�SFSSAFtI,F. PfI�TT(}N `I"l�A(� � i�wn?r T� : y96?6 ARC�'�►7�CA:�E Frr�p Clas� : 1�E�±� t]F FORTi,RHf� Ne.i��,brrrhq��: �TTG :��' Af�THC�N:'S �HiJRCH Y�Sr 8�iilt ci,;�y° SW "I�: Jt�[�{?7F �T . '"T+��iFcG, nB 97223 :Li��ir.g Ar�� . :��i.e L�at� . :.aa� Pz�a ce S':}t�S . ��,�3` SW M�� KEN?tc �T re�o�� Tyre . r Tr.st Fiuml-,ar , �1�r�i4'1173 .•%�:�P, 'r�t'Qc� . 4f'��. J�} ` �'I,.Pr(:�t],011� : �'�:r�' :�Fn:��r: - 1')93 F�r��,�r�y Vel,).13PS . xmpr�vrrnont� 5 y (�.) t`�`.�? T�:� �tmtix� La.a3 a �5��=:�, rf3 't''St i�L �tS��$5P� ^.5 }� l=1 Gu:�rez�t I,�v: 4� . � > _ ,f c� �.� Tax.. . 4�6.33 ��pmf�`i�rr.: 5 cj !-1 '^,�?�:�:�� ssas�rnFnts : Ta,fabt� > �5,y94� (=i *"�* K�r '�axes Dtr� *�� . . , ..,,..* . n�;�r�3s t;FeP �P:TU.RN key ; . . . .. . , .. n:....,_... .��..._�..�.. �.,__�., - - ut�.��:� . _ �_i..�-.r•:.� r.::t t_:':.: - - Prr�^.=.rr�! I,£ : jL�E541%� ��li.r f{��)49�4_1N1 ��P3� fZ'!J�Al"�1) i:e�T:? f?a�,,y,y�,��Grt: At..RF'+.; ?.4�:?, �C�N-?�y;.F.SSAF'i..�• Pl.��;Ti1r1 . �wr,�r ID : '�982±'s Fr.o1, C.13�� : �6�3:? ,��:CHllTOCF4�: (JF FOR.TZ,Ai��n I�Gi��hb�r�uc��3: WT;� ' �T A�1TKf3�{Y'S CHURCH Ypar F1u�?: . �t-c�5 �,W ?�S: KF�i7.IF �;T I,ir�.n�. Area . `!"TG�a�, QP 5�7�23 S�IP ��t� , �a1� Pr.i �,p . S�}us ; � ��PP(� �:7R? � q Tl1�l f'{C:(:kL't�:` : �:}'.�J��1f?� 44��d �rp'cQ , L?i J a 7'S �:Cet�tpt]C�1Ct T : ;�'.Y. 1�1`)3 PxCipA,rty Ve]L(PS hiort L+�nrl.e�r: - jmprovornent� S �7 (+} I,and S �� (+t 1:7J3 T�Y �t�tv� Totel A��24�ed S �7 f=? Currant �,avf ed �'axes : 0.09 ExQr�gt i ans S C� (-) �.,e�,ia 1. As�?s��mer�ts : Taxablz � � c-� *** t�r, Taxzs D+i� *** +3�r r��s t.�e :R�TIFRN kF+y : - - n:�_.t _.. a..__...,,,�., o__..«a - - :�x��,:..a� i �•..��. ., ,�•-�.,,�4�.. Fr�;*.�ar, t! T.�J 4�fr�4�?7�3 2�.t?��-t3c�gc�� :r��i .P�op�rtyi L�g�� I7�s�ripfi�on: .44r�C �{GN-�o�FSS,A�tL� �a�:��r T.17 . J��$3' Frax� Glas� . :��t�� nfiCHi�IC1C:�:.� ;�F F��R.T.LA??r� N�i�tR�"rfaooa: x-� i.;i �;R.Ec;U�i Yn,�r 8ui.lt : 1�b;ik} �fN GR,'�I�T STr^.F�T L�v1:�3 t�� T?r,�RD, ��R y�7,�.?3 �'�� Dyte . Sal«� Fr��.e . vii:rtn ; t?E`�F� SG� G�RNT A�VF i:nEsr�d Typ� : 7nst �tumk,Qx : 0�88c�%ia� Go�',a Area : �23.7� �x�r��gt�azr� : FX 1.��)3 Frc��iert y tl�!uas M��rt T,pn��pr� '- T.(!Iprnv�m�nt� 5 c.� c+) � T•�nd � c1 {-r) iy�3 Ta:: 5¢attra Tot.yt A��?s�ed 5 F� t=) Cu:�rPnt 7.PVi��1 Ta.c�� : F�.c�i3 E;:empt�ons : � (-' w�F�,i�l fl��ps�mr�nts : T�xa�le � � {=? �� Nc: �a�x�� nup �k� , ��?,r��s ��;a R�TUCH kgy . — — r�:�_., �.. r....,...,.+.. a.,.,..�.a _ _ . . . . , . . , ' . _�Y�'t' •. . ' ,._ ':c ;x��. . [ . • 1�` t� �;�'�ti; .itw .i . ..�'. ..,.. . � I I I C" I D O ❑ O , � Q I I = o o j� � 4 [l V' �.8'` Lz� � I 'i ° � � � � � a � � � � � � � � f rn.e � 6 o n n � � $ � � o � � � � � 3 � � � � � � C � � � � 1 � � � �y � : �1 p�j � � w � � �� x ie �a�i I �_ ( �� ti. � — �°— � — _ V � a � � �� i i ��_�� -` I � I � �`` — _ � � �� -�� I I � ��p� � I I � �3� � � I I� �•�'� � I � � � I I i O f1 O > � � fl � t F � d 3 �� m I � I � o � °u k O � I a g I v O ��i fi � � o 0 0 � � H.I1iUN � 8 I � d � � I � •+ o 0 o u � � I I I � ! � .w wrric�..,.,.� I b� m H C•E•C•C•A�C•C•I .- � z�' SAINT ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH 4�c� A Meociate� � Tigard Oregon �� ."c� � � ti�� _ - --- - �_. � ..r i�}� U a U U o '�� 6'� la��! U , , EX 12" GONG STORM SEWER V W U FIRE NYDRANT ' 'r� AD�ITIONAL ROW LOGATION OF ON-SITE WATER ' r'� EX 6" WATER LINE G7UALITY TREATI"IENT BASIN � t EX1571N6 ROW — — — — � � PROPOSED ROW _ _ _ _ _ GB AT LOW POINT iN �� PARKiN6 LOT 4 i — � — — — �O�li S - 5W JONNSON STREET PROP DRAIN UNE G� " +( SLOPED AT I% � o G: C C GC ' j� � � C' r ~ �. 1 � . � � � i \ \ � � ,� „�.,5 � i �. G. I G ' I INV OUT�161.61 J � _ . � R�I'1�163.80 V � - � � ; a TAX LOT 1600 C I � �. UJ �� E c • ] i c . _.�-' � Z � � G - , G , f w f � EXISTING PLAY FIELDS � SEGURI77 I G . I C ' � I�� '"' LI I G C ; � 4 � . z � : �� o � ' �� c : IZ F - - - - - �� - -� , � Q I� z PARKING 80UNDARY LINE ON SAME G '�Q L . IY f o Q HEARING AS R TO NORTH + G �� . � � � � i ` � _ � z� � . � � � I dm c .� .�_,; ,:��` � i �� TAX LOT 1700 � G ' . � i � I� � c t6 . . . . � � I cccc ccccc I I � LAYOUT - - - - - - � - - - - I tI' PLAN 8-15-97 2 ;L_ ____- ��Yyl � , U� �� U o '�]`� <� �+�l�1 U U W V _ _ Overf low Parking 15 RED SUNSET RED MAPLE REOUIRED PARKING: 0 SPAGES 4 VAR ReD'rwiG DOGWOOD � EXISTING PARKING: 11� 57ANDARD �q 28 GOMPACT ti�� 5 PARNET COTONEASTER _ I S 2 �G �� 14'1 707AL 17 WESTERN RED GEDAR PROP05ED PARKIN6: 14 57ANDARD — 58 COMPACT x I HOGAN CEDAR — U o 7� TOT L � m EXI571NG SOLID FENCE AT NEIGH80R TOTAL PARKING: 131 57ANDARD � O (40X ALLOWABLE 86 GOMPAG7(38X) � GOMPAGT) 7 H.G. 63 ARNEY GoTON A5 R � 224 70TAL ,..V_, 5 GAL � AGTION� ''� O �c PoNDEROSA PiNE I ADD 14 STANDARD SPAGES 5B F To RErIAIN — GOMPAGT SPAGES IN T�E L07 � — AT THE SOUTN WEST GORNER � _ — — — — — — — — � `� OF 5W JONNSON 57REET AND SW GRANT AVENUE � "' S7RIPE AND LASEL 5 Z � HANDIGAP SPAGES IN LOT 'D' � � ' z �o� sic.NriNG Q � DISTA GE - P - � -- + N e�.0 �a r I�c i n g H GOTONEA57ER DAMMERI ! Z b T,-P � � Lot Landscapit-�g � ; 8 VAR REDTWIG DOGWODD � (!]� RE�UIRED PE121METER: 10' BUFFER FROM I'� 46 PARNFY Go7oNEA57ER STREET TREES: 9 TREE5 5 GAL �20-40 �� PLANTING INTERIOR 7REE5: 70 SPAGES / 7 � ID 7REES P�N (I 7FtEE PER 7 SPAGES) 8-15-97 3 ...... i I I ��'�' ap � � � \ /� /`k v " � __ /� � I �' i i / �� r�l �—, . � �� '�_ I �� N � o� x x�J � � , v o � � � � x i I i �,�� \ -� � � _� I � 4��', 1 1 �/ -- - -� � �� i I � �a �� k " � ( � � � � ] II � I I � � ��I I ►6� 1 �� o � I '�I�------ I� �I I I � �.�?°6" � gr'} ��-< / � 1 � - �x� ��,-,o--.-. �6�� al � � ��` o ��'+ '�.�,.__._.� C� �i i',`�°%:: ; ' o o i i r � _ �4 � 1 E _ � i - p� � ,o � {� � � � 73 y ��\ atio9 ] Q �Zf� i � �-� � 0�50`,, � 9 Xo � �_ � ��►° �7a ��: � �69 �� ; � _� IPO �� . � � ��' d � x •.. � �P+ � �`�� o _ ._.� l � � W � �� e 1 %/ � PJ� `�� , l � \\ i / � � �� F` Q � / / 1 �`. �� 1 / � \ ``/ r; � \\I �'a"� \ �� i� o�� ' ` _ � `` O / _� 0 � Q �� .� � " - - (L4 Q ---- QpJ x � � � O � � � / � �-- / \ ♦ . 'L X -- ( Z� ) 4� ��'`�1� — ��fE , �—_� � i� I � O � �' � (X— � �. x r y � 1 I � W ZJ I � 3 °S _ �� \ �g0 / f — � X > � � � � � 3 i � fl -- � � � `a � `-___L� _ I po p o �x � S �� ' —x_ x � q -- �- x " X � 4 / ��O , � ' 'Id I QP� � � v xlI � a :. �o ' �lo`y. , Q�,J � �., p��9- Nl�Q aE.�' �� 1 ' p �p �e�� / /� � _ to�1 l �,�o M�o ��9` 9�+ / �� r� ' , � ., � fl i .�. n /� �4� � � ��" m b d � � $ C•E•C•C A C GI � a m z z SAINT ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH �i Awoef�tn ` j m n Tigard Oregon �%y ;�-�= �- i � � _Y... t : . . . „ , „��, , , . �- , , , „ ,_ , , , .., , . , , „ � , � , � �� CITY OF TIGARD . COti1�.�vNITY DEVELOPti1ENT DEPAKTMENT APPLlCr�T10N CHECKLIST � cmr o�no�to The items on the checklist beiow are requtred for the succesful completion of your applicatton submisston requirements. Thts checklfst Identifles what Is requtred to be submitted with your appllptton. Thls sheet M�„ be returned and submitted with all other appllpble materials at the ttme you submit your land use applicatfo�. See your application for further explanatton of these items or call the Ctty of Tigard Planning Divis(on at (5031 639-4171. Staff: _i�t��° oate: �7 �'S 4 �►PPllUT10N & REUTED DOCUn�ENT(5) SUBMITT�►L RfQUIREMENTS INCLUOE �MARK iTEMS A) Application fomn (1 copy) �� B) Qwner's signaturelwritten authorization �,l _ Q Title transfer insirumendor grant deed- �►f+'f - D) Applicant's siatement Na. of Co i 2-�� E� Filing Fee p � S_�, 6/S SiTE-SPEClFIC MAP(SyPWV($) SUBMITTAL RFQUIR�MENTS INQUDE �/M^R)CED (TEMS �U Site infonnation showing: No. of Copies = 1. �cinity map �� 2. Site size & dimensions �� 3. Contour lines (2 k at 0-109'0 or 5 k for grades > 10°'0) p� -�. Drainage pattems, courses, and ponds m� 5. Locativns of natural hazard areas inc(uding: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas o _ (b) Slopes in excess of 25 0 0 (c) Unstable ground o (� Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potentia( o (� Areas having severely weak foundation soils Q 6. Location ot resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive ��ap Inventory incf udin�: o (a) Wildiife habitats � (b) Wetlands o 7. Other site feacu�es: (a) Rock outcroppings � (b) Trees with 6" + caiiper measured 4 feet from ground leve( ❑ 8. Locatio� of existing structure5 and their uses o 9. Lo�ation and type or on and oif-site noise sources o 10. Location or existing utilities and easements �� 11. Location oi existing cfedicated right-of-ways � ��~�� PAGE t Of i , 6} �ite Deve�ooment F In i 'n ; C� No. of Copies _� � 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals �� 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets 8� other public ways and easemencs on the site and on adjoining p�operties d/ �b� ProPased streets o� other public ways & easemencs on the site � (c) Altemative routes oF dead end or proposed streecs that require futu�e extension -�. The (ocation and dimension of: � (a) Entrances and e.cits on the site � ib) Parking and circulation areas �� (c) Loading and services area (� Pedestrian and bicycle circulation � fe) Outdoar common areas ° • A . . p l 5. The location, dimensions & setbacfc distances of all: �� (a) Existing perrnanent siructures, improvements, utilities, and easements wh;ch are located on the site and on adjacent P�aPeny witfiin 25 feet of the site d/ (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easemertts on the site � 6. Stonn draina e ci ities and ana(ysis of downstream conditions �� • San�cary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped �°� 9• The location and type of outdoo� lighting considering crime prevention techniques �� 10. The location of mailboxes 1 l. The location or all structures and their oriencation �� 12- Existing or p�oposed sewer �eimbursement agreements v C� Grading Plan Indicaiing• No. of Copies _ The site development plan s II include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings nd shall contain the following in�ormatio�: 1• TF�e location and eYtent o which grading wi11 talce place indicating: (a) General contour (in (b) Slope ratios ° (c) Soil stabilization proposa ) ° (� �pproximate time oi year r the proposed site devefopment p 2. A statement from a reaistered en 'neer supported by data factual subsiantiating: (a) SubsuRace exploration and g technical engineering report o (b) The validity of sanitary sewer a storm drainage service p�oposals ❑ (c) That all problems wil) be mitigat and how they wi(! be mitigated o 1.�N0 I.SE APftlC�T10N/(,In PwGE 2 Of S _ �� +�cnitectural U��wing�In i in : "'�. of Copies __ - - The site development proposal shall incfude: t . Floor plans indicatin the square footage oi all structures proposed fo� use on-sit 2. Typical efevation drawin oF each structure � Landscaoe Plan Indicatin� No. of Copies � The landscape pla� shall be d�awn at the same scale of the site ana(ysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable �� 2. Locatio� and height o� fences, buffers and screenings �,� 3. Lo�ation oF terraces, decks, shetters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ �t. Location, rype, siie and species of existing and proposed plant materials � 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions @� (b) Erosion control measures that witl be used o � i in , 0 Sign drawi sl,all be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.11� ot the Code part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building P rmit to construct a sign. G) Tra�c en ion E imat : o H) Preiimina Partitio ! t ine Ad'ustmen Ma Indi a in : No, of Copies 1. The owner o� th subject parcel o 2_ The owner's auth 'zed agent � 3. The map scafe (20,50, or 200 feet-1) incf� north arrow and date a -�. Descriptian of parcel loca ' n and boundaries o �. Location, width and names f streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent t the parce! v 6. location o� all permanent b i(dings on and within 25 feet of al( properly lines 0 i. Location and width oi all wate courses o 3. Location o� any trees within 6" o ;reater caliper at 4 feet above �round leve! o 9. ,�II slopes greater chan 25°'0 0 10. Location of existing utilities and ut ity easements ❑ t I. For major land partition which crea a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way locat n and width v (b) ,� sca(ed cross-section of the prop sed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. �ny applicable deed �estriccions o 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclu erficient future land division where applicable � . ��t:canoN i usr PAGE�Of i �i �uoaiv�s+on rrel�mirt,arv plat Ma� and Dat� IndicatinQ: �Vo. of Copies ___ ' , 1• Sca(e equa(ing 3 ,50,100 or 200 Feec to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet a 2 The proposed na e of the subdivision � o 3. Viciniry map sho 'ng property's relationship to arteria) and collector si�eets o -�. Names, addresses d telephone oumbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer nd designer (as applicable) p S. Date of applicatio 0 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided o 7. Names of adjace t subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining par�el of un-subdivided land o 8. Contour lines r lated to a Ciry-established benchma�ic at 2-foot intervals fo� 0-107o gra s greater than 10°�0 � 9. The purpose, cation, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to th proposed subdivision): � (a) Pub(ic a d pcivate right�f-ways and easements o (b) Public an private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic er mains including fire hydrants � o (� (�lajor power t hone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses � (� Deed reservations for a�ks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances o 10. Approximate plan and profi! of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes i dicated on the p(ans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water istribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and re hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline p� files showing the finished grade of all streets incfuding street extension for a reasonable distance beyond the limits oF the proposed subdivision o 13. Scaled cross sections o� pr sed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 1-t. The location of al I areas sub� to inundation or stonn water overriow ❑ 1�. location, width & direction of w of all water cou�ses & drainag�ways o 16. The proposed lot configurations, proximate lot dimensians and lot numbers. Where lots are to be sed fo� purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upo such lots. o 1;. Tne location o� all trees with a diame r 6 inches o� greater measured at � feet above �round level, and the lo tion of proposed tree plantings o 18. Tne existing uses of the property, inc(u ing che (ocation of all structures and the present uses or the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain arter platting � 19. Supplemental in�ormation including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) o (b) Proof of property ownenhip o (c) A p�oposed plan for provision o� subdi ision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural Teatures including roc;c outcroppiri , wetlands & marsh areas ❑ ?1. If any oi the foreooing information cannot prac�"cably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be inco�porated into a �arrative and submitted with che application � �.�wo�se�eanoN�usT P�ee a oF; . _ � J) Sola� Access Caiculations o i4 Other Informatio� No. of Copies o ��v.dd��sc vw.a.�r�s t.w0 liSE�PPUUTtOn/UST �wCE S Oi S i { i , , EX 12" GONG STORM SEWER I r�' ADDITIONAL ROW EX FIRE +�7YDRANT ��E-bEISIZA�Eb LOGATION OF ON-SITE WATER I '�Q EX 6" WATER L�NE Z �OUALITY TREA7MENT BASIN � '�� O E%i571NG ROW - � � PROP05ED ROW _ _ _ - - - � -- 10' �0' � GB AT LOW POINT IN � PARKiNG L07 -_- �� SW JOI-{NSON � -- —- -- --= — - — — STREET— � PROP DRAIN L�NE 2 G �� BLOPED�1f I�i G C G C � � C � �J � G � � � � _.___.�?�12iY�4U5_ f� G ' G � � � � c � � INV OUT•lil il Q 1 � � G Rlt'1�163.9C G � G � G r TAX LOT 1600 G � G w IN � I G .�_�y} � �l w �I� EXISTiNG PLAY FIELDS � I SECURITY I G- � ` � Q II� � iLI I C � �� z I� � - - � o� - - -` � � f� H � � � "�� ` I U' �' � G � � ` � 3 �I � .:, , I u� TAX LOT 1700 I C � t��j _= '! f j � ( I� G � 1 � � G G C C G C G G G C I �` f r 1 � _ - - - �+ f f� .r I 11 SITE PLAN CASE Nc�. St. Anthony's El(HIBIT MAP Overflow Parking Lot � CUP 97-0007 I �\\ \J O Sl�'C I �+ �I � '� W II � � Z ZN � O (� C� Q �� W �� N � �s/�F A� � � Q � � W ._ � � Q°�� ° <-s'' � � ,o UBIE � P — � � �,�� ' � ' ti�T �� 'F ! � ._ � ' �- ' � s,. �, � �� , � ._ U �� Vicini Ma CUP 91-0001 ! ......_.._.. � p N St.Anthony's ' __ _ ___ i _O�e�flow Parking Lot , i: CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(apment SFtaping� Better Comrnunity CITY OF TIGARD `INashington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c� BY THE NEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0007 Case Name(s): ST. ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Name of Owner: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland In Oregon Name of Applicant: St. Anthony's Parish Attention: Leslie Sieg Address of Applicant: 9905 SW McKenzie Street City: Tigard State: Oreqon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: 9870 SW Johnson Street City: Tiqard State: Oreqon Zip: 97223 Tax Map(s)/Lot No(s).:WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Request:--➢ A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. ione: R-4.5; Residential, 4.5 units per acre. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.90, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. ACt1011: --➢ ❑ Approval as Requested 0 Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial NOtiCC: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: � Owners of record within the required distance � Affected governmental agencies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: � THE DECISION SNALL BE FINAL ON ,1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. AppCel: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. TNE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M.ON ,1997. QIICStI011S: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAUFEQUEST FOR COMMENTS _. � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD � Community Development � SFiaping A Better Community DATE: Septemder 9,1991 T0: PER ATTACNED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STA�F CONTACT: Mark Roberts[x31A Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[50316847297 RE: CONDITIOHAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0001 ➢ ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT Q A request to develop a 47 space overflow parking lot for church services and related community functions. LOCATION: 9870 SW Johnson Street; WCTM 2S102BB, Tax Lots 01600 and 01700. Located at the southeast corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 4.5 Units Per Acre; R-4.5. The purpose of the R-4.5 zoning district is to establish standard urban low density residential home sites. As a conditionally permitted use, the R-4.5 zoning district also permits religeous assembly and uses related to religeous assembly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, W E NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: FI'IdBy-September 19,199] You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y01181'C u118bIC[O�CSp011d 4Y thC eb0ue dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ W ritten comments provided below: (PCease provide tFie fo(lounng info�mation�Name of Person[sl Commentlng: Phone Number[sl: CUP 97-0007 ST.ANTHONY'S OVERFLOW PARKING LOT PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS � _ , REQUESTFOR COMMENTS N�TIFiC�Ti�N UST f�A UN��SE s OEYELIPMENT AP�l1CAT11NS � cR�cc�to cs� ct�n CIi1�U INYBLYEMEIR 1�AMS m nK.n�nw..�.�.n,ar�..�c� FIIE NO[Sl.: C �P �i`1- 060�? tiLE NAMEISI: S-� �w`��• ' � Lep= CRY BFRCES �ANCED PLANNINGlNadine Smith,vw,.ro w.«..., MUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJo.�.a.�e.rw„�.�, � DEPT./c,.�.A...e�ona, UILOING DIVJDavid Scott,e,r�o� EERING DEPTJBnan Rager,o�.�a.w,e�.« ATER DEPTJMichael Miller,o..�.m,,.r.,,.�., _CITY ADMINISTRAT10WCathy 4Vheatley,cnn«.w PERAT10N3 DEPTJJohn Roy,P....,,�.�.a, _OTHER spEeuu a�icrs TUALATiN VALLEY FIRE 3 RE3CUE _TUALATiN VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Fire Marshall AdminfsVativa Otflce JuOa HutimaNSWM Program Washington County Fire Distrid PO Box 745 155 N.First SUeet (plac�In pick-up box) Beaverton.OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 ioe�u a�o s�a��nR�icna�s CITY OF BEAVERTON CITY OF TUALATIN OR.DEPT.OF FISH 3 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS PO Box 4755 Planning Diredor 2501 SW Fust Avenue 775 Summer Street.NE Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO 8ox 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland.OR 97207 Larty Conrad,s.r.o.vr.�« OR PUB.UTILI7IES COMM. _Mike Matteucci.H.w�na c�a. METRO OR.DEPT.OF GEO.3 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE - 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon SVeet,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2738 Portland,OR 97232 City Manager US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. PO Box 23483 Paulette Allen,a�a.a��.�rcoda�ra OR DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.3 DVLP 333 SW First Avenue Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,f�Nnip�psCOadnMa(CAA't20AY) 1175 Court SVeet.NE PO Box 2946 Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 9720&2946 CITY OF KING CITY METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION City Manager 800 NE Oregon Stroet OREGON DEPT.OF TRAN3.(ODO� WASHINGTON COUNTY 15300 SW 116th Avenue Building 116,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of�and Use 8 Trans. King City,OR 97224 PoMand,OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,vw.q 155 N.First Avenue 3040 25th SUeet.SE Suite 350,MS 13 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO OR DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Planninq Director Bonnevilb Power Administratan PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 ODOT,REGION 1 _Brent Curtfs ceP�s� Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Femera Sonya Kazen,ao�n«.coaa. _Scott King�cr��:� Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Mike Borreson��.� CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Tice�wY� David Knowles,A..,.p e...�or. _OREGON,OEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUAUTY Tom Harty tcu�.�r��ov..� Portland Building 106,Rm.1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy tc�.+.�+a��ov.� 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,�„rsv.a.r� Portland,OR 97204 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 �11itTY PSOYIOERS Al1D SPECIAL A6QIglES BURUNGTON NORTHERN RJR METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.(R/R) _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Administrative Office Jason Hewitt Clifford C.Cabe,ConsUuction Engineer Michael Kiser,Project Planner 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street Vancouver,WA 98660.30U0 1815 NW 169th Place,5-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 COLUMBIA CABIE COMPANY TCI CABLEI/ISION OF OREGON US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Craig Eyestone NW NATURAL GA3 COMPANY linda Peterson Pete Nelson 1a200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer 9500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland.OR 9T209-3991 GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Kaft.Engineering PORTLAND(3ENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MC: OR030546 Brian Moore Tigard.OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Sc�olls Ferty Road BeaveROn,OR 97007 h:�pxryvnestsrsvfaidics.mu 2-May-97 i I -1-� !, � I W � � ', � II � zs�o2anozaco I I 2s�oza�2000 n ii■ 251D28AD21D3 �� /�� ,o�B.�zzoo � W I 1028A021D2 � 102BBD0 3 � �1D28A021Q1 �, � '�S 2B6�0800 251026AD21D0 ^ 2S102BB012� � 2&1D28A0190 ■� ZS10288DOBD. ;SiD286D1300 � � 2S702BA01601 > 2S 102BAD 1800 C ZS102BB�t20� � 251028B0140D /�� 26t0^<BBDD604 25102@B0130" �/1 s+ozeAaas�., � 1 251�28801202 .-S1D2860150 �c�en�aeoc �e.. Artgoo � 26102B&00805 � s�ozeno:�uo �o�gansoo � 2S1D266D�30 2510288G1600 �s �a.mxaoo 2S10288D1700 s� '.0�5�;:zc�� 102BBDi80 I � i u51D28801802 � � 251�2680190D I � 25102BBO18DD � ■� � � 251028D�O1DD O I 'I }� I� �� '� •- '� tiz� U � F ; '� � ... , VicinityMap N CUP 97-0007 St Anthony's �� O�erflow Parking lot ► �t�:G'�a�.(,�c � �T F E� �� C� � �e. - ONMENTq�Q�qL� , " RECEIVED / - �r,� � � '�^� ;� EL�1V�pqNy pRjpE NOR � THWEST REGtON 294a S.E. POWELL BLVD. • P.O. BOX 42287 • PORTLAND, OR 97242-0287• (503) 234-0611 • 1-gpp_87g_1285 • FAX (503)234-03 { 8C � Apri 1 19, 1999 �''�C.�c.a'� .�t'�� -{-� �`'`-- � Sheila Monroe � �� Voluntary Cleanup and Site Assessment Section �a"`� Q'''` `��°�'`''' Oregon Department of Environmental Quality � � � 2020 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 400 �,,Z�s Portland, Oregon 97201 �/ , � �� QUARTERLY MpNTTp�G �rvx �� . ESCI# 2006 1 � Sunset Fuel Property 12515 SW Grant Street Tigard, Oregon � INTRODUCTION � This re . port presents the results of field activities and chemical analysis of groundwater i samples collected for the first quarter of 1999, for the above referenced location. On March 31, 1999, monitoring wells (MW_1 thro chemically analyzed. The results are included and d c�ed in this eport� S�Pled and Field work was performed to comply with current Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) guidelines. SITE ffiSTORY On October 16, 1978 Sunset Fuel Co. purchased Tiger Oil. Tiger Oil sold heating oil to residential customers in the Tigard area, Sunset Fuel Co. ceased utilizing the site for sale and distribution of heating oil products in February of 1994. The site contained two 12,000 gallon above ground tanks and associated loading. On December 11, 1996 Sunset fuel received a letter from Tua]atin Valley Fire & Rescue, requesting the removal of tanks and associated piping by February 15, 1997. On January 17, 1997 the tanks and piping were removed and recycled by Schnitzer Steel. Soil samples were collected from the area around the former above ground tanlcs and loading rack. Soil samples indicated Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) identified as Diesel existed in soils beneath the tanks, with concentrations ranging from 118 to 9,940 parts per million(ppm). .ailers using nonac._ ..ng bottom-em Pege 3 sampling bottles and capped with Teflon septa-1 ned Iidst�T'he sam es ePeied stenlized and entered onto a Chain-of-Custody form, placed in a cooler on blue ice and transported to Wy'East Environmental Sciences Inc., located in Portland, Oregon. Ground-water Analytical Data Ground-water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) using �' NWTPH-Dx. Ground-water samples MW-2, MW_3,�d �� ,ere also analyzed for � Potynuclear Aromatic Hydrocar}�ons (PAH) by GC/MS-SIM. Chemical analysis were performed by Wy'east Environmental Sciences Inc., located in Portland, Oregon. TPH of 0.61, 0.66, and 0.94 ppm w� detected in wells MW-2, 11�iW_3, �a�� Field - 3 monitoring data have been tabulated and presented on table l. Ground-water chemical analytical reports, chain-of-custody, sampling forms,and purge water disposal receipts � are presented in the App�ndix. Please call York Johnson of Safe-Way Tank Service at(503)234-p611 if you have any � questions. � Sincerely, Safe-Way Tank Service by, � '. , � � York Johnson � �� , . :; ,� �i 7� n�� . �.�� T1' �,r�. i :�-`S�f.' � a _ i `� IvJ�� ` �Pvtil v �1'j` � _' :_ � •7 • •n�� _ �-1 J' �I . ' ' � '.!�" �� i/�etx�(r� af . � ''�, 1� � f.°'- I �� •�F" � � � ',=� � /�SL . � ' N _ Q_, �t •y�. I m ��• ./ ' ... . { '_ _.. �,�� )s 1 �� s � � '�� I� II�,� �--• .. �'•..�.� � �.I ��J• ` �• i I F, \I ` �\ i�-y'�`��—��J• ti �i . / �'S� �i• ..) V� H�eonf■ ca � ,��.�=— , �l, � ' `� L �� _ �� ' p�� 0• " . .�:./'' �-~ � :�` '�'�.� --" � ' �� .; 2� ,'•% i ��• 1, /_ `'(s`� . I `o ,'_ yp '-- ��' �-s--yL'1�- � . • •: . ..�. , � :%� '�q l IG�- � _��_�� 7._--.� -' � '',ff?%�•. j�; - '�+� ri � �-�� _ I�� _, ..J�•�� .. . � '�° ;�e . - J-,. ��J�3 � ..3�y ` " \�� ,� � " _��b, � - Y� • '�\' •�•• •J•�'� + ��\� � I � -��.- � >� r — � :' :'-:Jh � � ,� , . ,. ,. � =i��,�,� y ��u _ '+' ��:�'Sw y NaarN„'\.K?rd.•, � S �J . ' _` -i{•_•—^ r-� -�, . ; 3� w ' ,. �� .Gr�n ..__v_""' ,� J. � �• , �, � _�� ",�,. �.r �-.s�f , -=� . : . 'dRl 1�.�,'� ,�.n��.;�. i' :i . � � ' � r . '� � �/ � � � ��' t � (:(. �. ti_ . . iw ." _ � T � n '� •�,j`..` L �� i• �i;� �ti( 1� F4 r`��"•�";+��• .a.l . � J I�A 1. ��•�1 � .�_�•�_�__ ��(V �� V•�i��t�-..I. ,`I !�. � ,:1 _ ==- �'-�.: .. ,-�'' , - . :,:- --�F,.` � �� i�c'�c� �� L�_: ��' �i'•y�y• �T,6��ap(-^�/• `� _�; � 'Y�•�, • . $ er, �•� �� - .7� ��I'" ��+,'JJ �� ' o I• '� .n .I.J ir�p �� -1 '"•:.7�,� , n l (p. ` � .S:i;:�'.r• 4. { • � � �� \�� r 7 .�u _ � 1 �. •¢ �i. 1Q ��J � r" �• 11 \ i� •�a j(�1' 4 ' ,;�• ' �� ,'•. ,^l �j . .. \ ('. irV 1 � - ' �' `i \`��;.:..� C`� f:,p I.yl, ' tC�: _ � n t�i' , , ,k`:`� ,i ` ' .i' ' �'•�. � . . I I. � "L .�.I� _•� '� _ —')�C=1--- •`�`�'^�'�`t��.�'�'� '/. � t ��^^_'��_� . .� •. .i' a.. � .••• •` . .�� • � / `I i ��, \ � I� 1• _ � \ � �� .�� _ • :; - , ; -�:��.�� SITE LOCATION ��..r��, T�7-� � .� .-�• :F�,��;��' 3, - � :�� _r.' ��u:� � - :.31 �k � �� ,'�`-� �N� � ri,. .��:r .�'' �';�: � ��_ `� , . —=,=7:"�y�r. �: � <,� '•r�wC�.�,t/•' � hj�r ' ��. �� , rW�LyVY'/:,�• ___ .�� y �'J; � .�� •'� ��.� / •' � �� _ ��.J .' i%_ __. ,. ��'e�'.: �t AMhun� ��' � �C1 -( `� ' 2 J �+ I � ti� . � �y � ;' j `r\- � Sth� �. ��\r�/ �!:tiy i (�'��/�,1. ' �'i'� �5'�•�•II;•` , - i _ , �� r-� . .\ i�� ; �\ Q �/ .��..`�,�,'' . V.i % ;•� :�_ P ��' :- :� �� .♦ � i•�.. � 4��;�,.,o� � =�„ �� . . . , .�v �;: �� h' . .a. .�' N;: �:d�3��:•.:1��^;I"t •+' � ,, ��G'.--t_�. ,. ' a _�_ ' � 6 M c I '( 1 • /i � ,�� • � ': r. '�.:�. TiK:�n Y'�!✓ �y�' �� y/� ��,\ � 1 ^ ..... � � f\�. /� p` .r �' �, �` •1 ;� a�r=� �.:st ' _-�. /�• �• 'Q. ._ :� � 1 t ! � /� _ - . � � � ,� ��• � �� ' � .�I. , .,. � ;�.ii, . ,�� :� :�f •� BM�LfGJ' , 3�, ;.. � � �: :/� `� � - ---�� .. /�? / %�I' �� %' /�/�. . � fy"�l ~ ��ry� �/ 1I�, �� ' _ .'j, �='"v,':`�� ;`' �,•y:y:_^ _ti I x`�:jY'�%:r'i y��-;;•�;-...: .�Q� - � , / �. . ..., _ /)�+�� `a l �� r . i��,yyy'L � \��x�\ ` � .._- '� �� n'��i l 7 �> �II�• •�•�.:••'y�i�f ,! ��, di, 1� .1 '. , i�r ��.:- f��• �-�.-y• � lf ! F:�1� �f •� "��,1.^� 1 �� ' �?r�,�, i'i � ll !: F .�•da..r�{r '. ..�:�;•1 /' ` � b •� 1 . ..0 .• Q�; .p •��. � �•fh•.?. .�: •��.-� �--t � •�s. � ` '�'�`� � y �� ^ '�..0 ji�.i,yrb �:� 1' H I _ .. P I p �� •'�: � 1 J f�%i :w 6nR��.vr ) �r A �.�( � ��/',`'l,' �:��_ •i, � •� � ;, . ,.i1 �� ,� a�s�� - ....r-=�= ' .�. ,�j�. � i I � �r ;'�Ja^ __ =,:'-,' �t�^cryY+;� f `, •,0,�!;1`1�6o'i _.i� ••�.� ' � : � Ir'1��s� '�IY�`'`�l/ .�� `k— 2�r �-r or ,-� � ' � ��.i-�'. ,;y �� .•'�:�+c•b� � o� � �� =�. ��•f ,�,,�,��!,u. �r R � _ •'i �s � r.�—rr�' —.4�_. 1 =.L-`�`� ,�:r,� � ?' - 3,� y f t .� il• a ' -��: ��` • �,;:�� '?' I..' � - °_,' -• � � �n 1+ �� ;)'J ~ %�\\ �1 �� .0 ��. ` `�''/� �'��;` .. � l. a � � 1 ''. ' ,�- F . �� 1��1' w ., ' ' "' � �� ,,�`;" � • � :. ', ' _•. 1 � � ev?��i��f. a.�Ki �`�� .�,•" e� �• 'o�'r i `Q '', ��_�. � y`{�'�s ==s �' q• I` -.�l : . � .y� � e -� �li� �_ odi:� _ j' . 1• ��i�� 's I �•____�/��_ � 'r. '- .�.� .�- :� r ^� ' � ,. . . �;• . � Q� Tw•w7iN ir �.,:.�� ^ .�= `�,. ,�„; . `�;. � ' <�___ . -�-� ��_`.'!� / .��I -;,:+„�•�: 1 ' �• .;• �� M a � Ce � F. R� � `I• + i� . �= ;/ �NLIU AEK S•�S1 L-��1' % •:l.'• •{• �i[_n .�� . '`•tl-� �R°,'� `�(: e'%: ` '_� �%� - :-•:��:�� ; `� :�—•i �r"�r,�' -`� � �� I:�I, -- ;� , � �� , .r�`.i�__ ,� ,; ��: . � � ,".��' _ •,�.. .�� ^1 ;�, � ,'�d�.� , ��:� 0�. .✓T.• i '�:.: ��'� .�/ � /� � BEAVERTOIV, OREG. 0 2�A � N_i4 ��c=�Cn IS� DU.4D4ANGLc 45122-d7-TF-024 � � ScaJe in Feet 1961 PHOT09EVISED 1984 DMA 1474 I`/ Nc-SE�IES �992 � J V(CINITY MAP � Sunstt Fuel Property T 12�1�SW Grant � Tigard,OR Plate 1 NORTH _, J � 1'--1 y W a a d I ,.,.' �----' '^.� C�..'" . :i L'r-'.".".I �'�111 111�!! �� A� �� '""� �� w"'r� —_1 n"'� !�'11 �� ► � /j�ii,� / . �% %/ ��,��'''�� ;��j/j,�,,,,,, Wy'East Environme»ta!Sc�ences, Inc. Oregon PAH by GC/MS-SIM � Analyte: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's) in Water f Field ID: MW-Z Site Name: Tigard Oil Lab ID: A4603 Site Number: Sunset fuel � Analysis date: 03/22/99 Report Number: 2>j70A Compound Sample (u�-) Blank Detection Limit Naphthalene ND ND 0.1 l Acenaphthylene ND ND 0.1 Acenaphthene ND ND 0.1 � Fluorene ND N� 0.1 Phenanthrene ND ND 0.1 � Anthracene ND ND 0.1 Fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 Pyrene ND ND 0.1 � Benzo(a)anthracene ND ND 0•1 Chrysene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 � Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND 0.1 � Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ND ND 0.1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ND 0.1 � ate: Percent Recovery: • Sunog � DFTPP 89 � � � i J � 2415 SE I1thAve., Portland, Oregon 97214 Phone(503)231-9320 Fax(503) 231-9344 .� ; � } //i�ii�/��,, /j;;'�i �%%��/% i�j�;�j�'` :��`�x//% Wy'East E�rvironmental Sciences, Inc. �/ /�/,�,,.:, o�/��%/%%/�ia..,,,... Oregon PAH by GC/MS-SIM ; Analy�te: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's) in Water � Field ID: MW-4 Site Name: Tigard Oil Lab ID: A4605 Site Number: Sunset fuel � Analysis date: 03/22/99 Report Number: 2»70A Compound Sample (u� Blank Detection Limit ° Naphthalene ND ND 0.1 J Acenaphthylene ND ND 0.1 Acenaphthene ND ND 0.1 � Fluorene ND ND 0.1 Phenanthrene ND ND 0.1 � Anthracene ND ND 0.1 Fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 Pyrene ND ND 0.1 � Benzo(a)anthracene ND ND 0.1 Chrysene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 � Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND 0.1 � Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ND ND 0.1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND 0.1 e lene ND ND 0.1 Benzo(g,h,i)p ry � Percent Recove Surrogate: rY� , � DFTPP 84 � � � � 241 S SE I 1 th Ave., Portland, Oregon 97214 Phone (S03)231-9j20 Fax(503) 231-9344 � .! � MUPII 1 VKIfVIs rit4L�crvn� ... 1 (as�evuUea 01r oRS u7.1'H a oAlt aaato�4ls) ' vtt�ons tor comOhclr�y nas npon+�.vo tne�.�r�•p•ot uws ram. Start CMd� 111le7 (/1 UwNtK/YRWE(.'7' �. � (�LI1C:I TIO1V UF k Isv Irta!aexc�iMiw+ '� �"JOD NO 'm ca••► Washin�tvn Nrrr Tow�u�+ 2.00 9 R"'o' 1.00 W s'wo" 2 � McNOacsss os►o�t�� . g E v�d NW v.or.eo....aw�,. SYwI IRa E R1��ST �pd Owc cw roRnarvc se.n at z►p m�a 2.EIIl�ShNt�d0�d d wNl bal�an (11 1'YPE OF WURK �y�,c��r sT,nwu�n . � Mew Constrvction (� Alt�(R�cortdition (� Alt��(Rep�ir �T��d,�acwo„ pt� � ri Cot►versbtl � Otepeninp n Abandonm�n �ATTACII 1i110 WIIM IOCATXX!OCMf1EU wv•�••�we.+oro..R.r .ca�...a�.aa.�w�+ (.�1[�RlLLING ME7''HOD (71 STATIC:W��FR�E�'81. � � � na+��y a� �] aot.ry�,a �] c.ae as� D.iow 4Mn sW+=.� 0.1. �mnM� � � ►4d+c..st.r.Auyw oa� n�s++fR06E 14ba.n ai«,,ur. bha.in oal. U RfIRF Hfll.E('ONSTRUCTIUN � WATER I�talRING ZllNEI' Special tianda�� O�Oh'd canphMd*'°� �j �. U�plh N r�Rw�rwLr w�s fvsl tou� s R � Fran Tn Est FbwlMe SYYI Oismeter From To �� _ �'� � V�0 n. G,y,Yo�.�.w� � J L�3aewrr�T TO Marwn.nf ��F� To G�e�f �iM WdQ�d GkNd TM'Mdd� � (91 WELL.�.Q� Grvwid t�lbn 1� TO — ' M�Mr1d From Te SWL � �� - - SANp� 1 iILTi � � Swl __ - - Frarn o IM�twi�l MerN SN� � GaA W+�Q�ti - � Tp � �E_ _ _, .. r' n. � Scre�n U { ptartrtr From To' t7�pt MatsM� TTp� .0�3� � F�Nw Pwl t . 2 e. TO 13 11. FIIIM Pr.t M�fd � � 5+�, �°'°° '". ene �ca�ed T/Y7l199� comaecea ��n►�� ` f3l w�LL T�T LxbuMtJtd)M��►N'cl!(:onstrwctor Cc�tirtcal�o/r: � �a�i1y n,d nr.�ak��Mo��'+•e on r»rnnsUaarX�.�•ncn.o.�Owrd�w�r.�M a Ns w�0 k n conpYww wlth Onpa��I wnshYellon st�r�rds. 1lrbrik ui�0 and p�� y�q Y�ornrllm nporl�4 aiow M+mr b b fNt�nn�w.i�dl�Md b�frf- �� IMWC Nw�f 1M02 Twiqu�hr�d•wlw 5� 'F+G D�Nh«M�'^fbw t«rW IL S'q^�d a/ KE7M G�s O�M� • wu water�rsl�do�N7 �iC� Mondo�W Cv+tstrudn�G' 'tc�.nr: py WAwn7 SUIOSET 1'UEl GO r COni0K4on. .Or w�+t P�� o.wh d.a.�.a w.�.rrro+ r►oM �w X. on mr.r.r a�..p nr vw��w+an da►..+.o«wd�wn.�r worM prtonn.d dwtic Qrc tinM's in ar�nc�M11+Orpvn vw1 axrafn�.tion slw+d�ds. TMa rpOn e tiw b M Renwka b�st d mr��Y��nd wYd. 1,IyyG lAe�r 1M17 � N�r.w d�.qw•.�p Gw+Mipi�YE�rwr 3�OM1 By ORlO MC�A'l�f � � � . � � _ a° �G ,, I :s - I � . � .-.• ::-r; f :.. c� r � � � �-�..�• ---,. c� ,-r-'.-_`` S — - � m � �f. �3� . �� - — ,� r�q� � - !—� � - . �..�,- �i N �� , t F-a�-• �^�'- �r,p�,�+r �, /i`��J t ��-�-�w j c.,�-+`�,� ... __ _ __ __...__.___.._- _ _--- -------- --- -- --- 1 — � -- � `''�k" s �"` ''"` ��.,_�.rl�°�.�,,, C.H-..b I�.�e�.� 3 J — - --__.. -----.- _ _ as_ ___ ,S�.•t �} �, � c� . c�;�� Pr p �r�..�+ ----"�--- ---.__-- __.—�.�.�f'��L-�-_-_�+t�`�'��de� `�"°' r``r t�" �- ....—�-----�-- v � ;;,�1.,ah„v�.< rW�..a. � - . :.,.�. (, ,�' S�.�+J t""a�.a�-, �'f'��'t-��I'—-- /R' . + � ___- ------ �'-- N i',,�y�5�r��,w�!}c�es�� y`�,"`�_ 5�� N J � .�.�,. - - -� � - - ..- �..� /�'��'� 1 � C YY�=,r,,,f-.,.,, .. . - - � SJ��q1f/►v�• e �i - --- �'G/Y1n�-- �L'`r i, ._ /4� c'��", c�-4. �- ,>0<<3 '��.r`� �c.Ri.,..�t�r� c e,.+�c�,.... Q'y'�0 t) � �.�;.._._. .�._ --_—._._� � �� y r��-�� W�+w.� `� `a,p � � �,,f�r�/ C� S � �"��3�,�-* �� `��.+� �� L , ��;, �� a�� . �- � � �� ; ... r�,�c�,� � .r r�-►� ,'�w-�� .m.:.--------— - - e_a,,, c�a� �•�.h� __ __ _ __. _ _—___._.__.____.__�___�_,.--_---- — N �.�.._ �-.�. `__ -�. (� v,.` � Fl n�-v�. � � c.�.AXI � -�r,C�.,C,a. ��r '�""�- ., _. __.------- - - -----------_----- -_ . Y�'��~I t - ___._�.� ��a.�c�� y'�'a'., _---- - ��`�"'"' - - - --� � _.�I�4t�)..1,,, d�_.�v�Ch,l,�.t,. b�i(,t,� �r d��'��-- �. v�s s �$`,�- --r . . ��S'��'yZT— �`-,�,.t �'�w.;. __._.. _ ,��P r,---------- -.--w��.+tr t� +�+t,-Y` _ /?=`�:trF.. .� � �,�+e��-Rl-�►*'°a'��S' � � �. ,.,, «�`�'��-�L9.r� JJ �IM t,. �%t�C"#`",P` — �7;?� C�+�-� _ _ � � � �,.� � ��.r .: �4fi�� C,d,,� ct„� ;� #",y��y�,�.� - � ��:�"+�`+� ° 1rj71 �,�G•:�,�°'� '! ��,��-+r �+�t't-v ra�i�,,,�/ c_ � p ` ' �y��_�� +} � ;� C�." CA� 61i�L? Dy�1 C�Y/+f 1-+� �J'(�' • -°- - � � �1..+,/r �/a-r.�.'ti J — ..�S r C)" C�' ` �"J�. �e ,�T,, ., ... _-- _ ._ _ — _ . ' ^ 2 ..+L- j�- f►,'L w a U ra .a.i p/l� .� p% . MUfVI 1 vK11�1�a ��CI.►.nGr vr�. � las requtea by OKS L1T.7�i i OAR i10.34a�1 In� -Goru for�ompMtk'b t�A1�eV�are en the 4�t ppe oi thla twm. San G�a� �i 1� R(1lF.CT �. �� (61 l.lKA !l11�Ul'�K'E P lr�ewl dezc_' iw� � co�.�e. tm � W�tshin�on � T.�+.tiy, L00 5 � 1.00 W s"'°" 2 , w,,,. ' �ucc►�aoc�sa or�rtJlno �. �� 1��or Nlly �r�d.cb.,..�+w�+� 61r�e1 Siii E W�V�iOE sT L.N Q�n� Glf IORTLAHO 51s1� U!1 Zlp I1I14 7.E�••sr...t.dd..sa d...e ioc.l+on 1 1'YP 'O 'W!)KX �s��s sw CRAUT sT,tx�o j�j New Conitruct►on � Alter(R�Gandltbn � ( Alt�r(Rspslr �T��,�d�,�oc,eo„ p�� ; � Conr�nton � � Deep�ninfl � Abandw�men � �n,�:++w►aw�ruix�*�a+pEntr,�v �r.�^�'•rra.�wo••N•�w�••�wro�.�o.. � � {.�1 UK1LLlN�MET1fUp �n sr.�r�c w.��'ER GE�t � �owy�w I f�►r�e (-]c.b+. ca F� a.,a.�e�s.�. o.+. �mn�s � � ►,ab..sc...A,�p.. o1Mt �� ...N«,v....w. +bf�..r,. o.+. LJ)BUI1E HULE C'(�NSTRIK'T/ON (i� WitTBR KFi1KlNG ZOI�'�C , sp.c+.�aaRearal I C�+d�+vr�� 16 � o.v��n�ku nrs�r�w 6 e � _� Frpn To � Esl flvw Rde 5m Diam�K Frwn To � � Y�wA o � �� p-� s�� To MorN,n+ww �0-T�F,on,� To G� M.�...I tNdd.O C.�wd �� (� W�'L(,/.lXi Groune Nww�on R TO yy�r From To SWL � GIGtVEiS ---• - � " l�LT3 s/1N0 � Sw1 �_ A�rwum' SMI 30.TS � . � -- From v NMn W � � ^ Ci�oul W�yM ro !� � n. � serw,❑ OdrM�r From To'�G�q�y MRwW TYP� 31d Strs � flket P�ck I At0 3 N. TO �j S�It. ; rqpK P�Nt �ir � � � �� . Osle staRed 71T7h 998 Campletea 71ZT/199a LS�LL TEST f�_.�._s ,..r:.,y WcU�Q�tstrrtccor Certific�ol+w,: 1 c�tty aw tiv work 1 pWlormd a+tl�wnst�udk,..,�r�an.or�to�donnwt d �wf11a in ootnp�i.o��wrlh O��poa rwf CG��i�1RUoa�d■. MslR►.k w��rid .. Prtnrtli�y YiMd birarllaw npe�l��Ew+�w Irw N M bW bwr�dp�aN b�l. � � wMIC I�nOw/0{Ot � T.i.�p..Y.�.af.wMc st 'F�C O�.w�r,wr.toi.�d R. 3t�d a KeTM o vlOOS O�" J was..ac«.w�1�s+a aon.� (� Mar.ito.Wd!C'.we.diw C.'erei rc+tiow: Dr YY1KrN� i1J1{3!T 1'tllL GO ser,�pt n� tM eo��r�on. a11on.a waY MM*'^� an�ic r�Out410 Ow ou�Wllrfon Q�MS np��d��.��t pRlonAf OYfi�Q M � D�ON d Wad to E��d.f�om �.b �' in»'s in oo��+w`�1`a�Ye^wd�ttrd�k ��is tis b M ��s pM1 d rrq kno.rbdp��nd(hYd. WMC Mwib��IM71 � N:pr»d�wP'M��O��^�� SIRMd DY 011�0 11COINtS � ..., ' Job Name �`��--C` � l �. .� No. w— � � Dace � - I 7 - � � Timc Sampled by `�d�� PL`RGE VOLU�IE PURGE 1�IETHOD Casing Diameter (D inches): � , �� 0 Bailer- Type: _� n 2-inch � �-inch � 6-inch Other JU �Pump -Type: '� � '" / Total depth of Casing(TD in fat) C� ��3� $�� k� Water Level Depth(WL in feet} �-l. c' From F� To FL i Number of well Volumes to be purged(�of Vot.) � PURGE VOLUIVIE CALCULATION: I�f��( _ � -C� x .7.S Z x 3 x o.o4os = . 7 �a� � TD(frt) WL(fcet) D (incha) #VoI. Purge Val. � FIELD P�METER MEASUREI'LENT Time Vol. pH Cond (�,S) Temp. Timc Vol. pH Cond Temp. � (�-) (Sal) ��C;]°F (�-) (8�) (�) ❑aC Q°F . i UZ ^ 4S1 G1, 7 .Z 9 . ��y $' `� . � � ' � Obscnadons during P�S�S(GVell condidon,'furbidiry.Colar,Odor): Discharge Watcr Disposal: ❑ Sanitary Sewer ❑ SS-gallon Drum ❑ Other. ' . SAMPLING METHOD , ❑ Bailcr-Type: ��P-T`3'P�= � LING DISTRIBUTION SAMP � Sam le No. Volume Bottle �� CO�� _� � QUALTTY CONTROL SAMPLES Du licate Sam les Blank Sam les Other Sam les � Ori ' Sam te No. licate Sam le No. T Sam le No. T le No. �a .� 1 � � �, /l'� UJ- 3 !ob Name � !,��Z`'�C- �� ' ' No. � Date 3 � �� "�cl Time Samp(ed by �O� PURGE VOLUNiE PURGE METHOD r i Casing Diameter (D inches): �y � ❑ Bailer- Type: -� ❑ 2-inch ❑ 4-inch ❑ 6-inch Other �Pump -Type: `_� � 1 Total depth of Casing (TD in feeq 12_-3 Screened Interval in f�ct: �� , Wacer Level Dcpth (WL. in feet) � 3C� From FL To F� • Number of well Volumcs to be purged(�of Vol.) � PURGE VOLUIVIE CALCi,TLATION: �� _ , 3 � X . 7 S 2 X � X 0.0408 = , �-s gallons � TD (feet) WL (feet) D (inches) #Vo l. Purg�VoL � FIELD PARAMETER MEASURE�NI' � Time Vol. pH Cond. (µS) Temp. Time Vol. pH Cond. Temp. � (min.) (a`al) �oC;l� (�-) (8�) (J�) ❑�C 0°F q_� _�`' .�2. ,. '�I s3� � � � S t,� .s � Obscr�-adons durin8 Purging{ Rlell condidoq'fu�idity,Color,Odor): -- Discharge Water Disposal: � Sanitary Sew�er ❑ SS-gallon Dtum ❑ Other. ! S2iMPLING METHOD � Eailer-Type: � P�P'TYP��1 � SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION � Sam ie No. Volume Bottte Pres�s�'ativa Lab C°�� .� � QUALTTY CONTROL SAMPLES Du licate Sam les Blank Sam les Other Sam les � pri ' Sam le No. licate le No. Sam le Na. T �� ar .� '09/�EP. 6_2000�g; 3�30PM 1 5(HKLN1JlULtSt �r r l�t�EQ VCSAS I 1V.LLJ � •� �uuC �� Department of En�vzronmental Quality Northwest Regiozt 2020 SW Fourth Avenue ''-, 7ohnw.Kitt�,abec M.u_covemor slll,��OQ *, Portland,OR 97201-4987 (503)229�263 Voice � July 1, 1999 TIY(503)229-5471 rorry Miesen Sunsec Ft�el Company 2944 S.E. Powell �oulevazd PO Box 42287 Porrland, OR 97242-0287 Re: No F�nher Action Determination for Sunset Fuel - Grant Avenue , ECSI# 2006 Dear Mr. Miesen: The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)has complcted its review of the information provided for the Sunset Fue] proporty located at 125 iS•SW Grant Screct,'hgard, Orcgon, The DEQ h�s determined that investioation and cleanup of the facility is complete and that no further action is izquired underOregon Revis�d Statutes (ORS)465.200 et. seq. T�EQ's deternaination that investigation and cleanup is complete is based on our undentandin� of the site including: I. In January 199'7, Sunset Fue1 Company decommissioned �wo 12,000 gallon, aboveground fuel tanks (ASTs). The subsequen� environmeatal assessmenrs idenrlfled heating oiI-contaminated soil and groundwater. 2. Between Augusc 1997 and July 1998, Sunset Flie1 exeavated appraximately 625 cubic yards of heaung oil-con�aminatcd soil that was subsaquently disposed at Hillsboro Landfill. A limited amount of contaminared soil remains at deprh (approxunacely 4-8 feet below ground surface). The contaminaced soil cxtrnds from rhe svuthern boundary of rhe former exca.vation to the south. towazds SW Grar�t S`treet. Contaminant concentrations are highest nesr the souchern excavation boundary and s�aa,ge from approxinnacely nono det�cted to 2,000 mglkg as heating oi7 in soil. Tf che petroleum contaminated soil is disiurbed or excavated at some future time, it should be managed in accordanee with all applicable rules and regulations. Polynunlear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) w�re not detected in a sample heavily concaminated with pctroleum. 3. In Septcmber 1998 and March 1999, Sunset�el sampled the groundwater via shallow groundwater monitoring wells installed in 7uly 1998. Pe�oleum hydrocarbons as diesel were detecced in downgradiex�[monitoring wells at concentrations between 0.29 mg/1 and 0.94 rng/1. Neither VOCs nor PAHs were detected in groundwater. Crroundwater elevations fluctuated becween 1 ro 8 feec below ground surFace. � DFL)-1 -�g�"�SEP._ 6.�4�4�bjg; .��.�br�"� 1 5�1K1,1-IL1Vl,tJL �r r 1l.LJCI1 VCSAS ' '�""" '� lB 001 . _ _ .. _ ..W ��., ........ �a 4, A Public Notice r�garding �he proposal to issue a "no furrher action" lener was published on June 1, 1999 with the public corrunenc period ending June 30, 1999. No comments v�ere received. DEQ has detemiined that no furthcr action is necessary because hazatdous petroloum constituents do not remain in soil or�xoundwater at actionable Ievels. Concentrations in �oundwater are expecfled�o decrease because the majority of the contaminated soil has been rcmovcd. The DEQ's deterrziinacion will not be applicable if new or undiscIosed facts show that thc investigatiort and cloanup does not comply with the referenced rules. We recommend that a copy of all information ba maintained with the permanent facility records. DEQ files and the�nvironmental Cleanup and Site Infoinzation (ECS� database will be updared to reflect the No Further Actian detcrnnination. If you ha�e questions,please feel free to contact me ac (503) 229-5445. Thank you far your participation and cooperation in DEQ's Voluntary Cleanup Program. 5incezely, �� Sheila A. Monroe Northwcst Region Accing Managcr � Voluntary Cleanup and Site A.ssessmcnt Section cc: Ginny Barretc: Sunset Fuel Brian Chenoweth: Rycewicz &Chenoweth Dan Hafley: VC5AS:AEQ �� •, � i � , '��. .� . d� }• M-" ... -,••��y,.� D. The Director shall taail notice of any conditional use proposal to the persons who are entitled to notice in accordance with Section 18.32.130 . E. Action on the application shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.32. (�rd. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.130.030 Expiration of Approval: Standards for Extension of Time A. Approval of a conditional use by the Hearinqs Officer shall be void if: 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a one-and-one-half year period; or 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved plan. B. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee, qrant an extension of the spproval period not to exceed one year provided that: 1. No changes are made on the oriqinal conditional use plan as approved by the Hearings Officer; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and 3 . There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. C. Notice of the decision shall be provided to the applicant. The Director's decision may be appealed by the applicant as provided by Section 18.32.310.B. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.13� .035 Phased Develooment or Existinq Development a. The Hearings Officer shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for conditional use review. B. The criteria for approving a phased conditional use review proposal is that all of the following are satisfied: 1. The public facilities shall be constructed in conjunction with cr prior to each phase. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities. a. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard. Revised 1/17/91 Page 317 � a �e�� C OF TIGARD �� ► � PRE-APPLICATION COHFERENCE NOTES ;'rJpm�u�ti��`ic�`Jimmuntty ' NON-RESIDENTIAL :r - � - � �--- -------._ . .. y. ! oa� '-7 q `� sr,a� (M�'3aE'� �?/� ;� APPLICANL- �`�� - �� A6ENL• L �s�i�� aF� Phone:[ l Phone: [ l �3�''—�� 17 q PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: `�`� r� � L�' � v��cL� ��°�'�� TAX MAP/TAX LOL• 2-s ► C3ZC�j� �ax L4 t� ! bUC�' L-! 3��' Y o,C� NECESSARY APPLICATION[S]: Co�c��ca.I Use �r{�.�`u.c�� //�a�,�,r,,�� ,�(�y�� O � l' Q � PROPOSAL OESCRIPTION: L�e� G� �� oV� �„- d UP„-�'�� Q� � COMPRFl�ENS1VE ° PLAN DE��6NAT10N: �-r�w �-��Sv .�s�� - � � Q ; ZONIN6 DESi6NAT10N: � �� Q�cd�L1� r 1 e �'o � ` e,;� � 2cak� � CITIlEH INYOIVEMENT ��'�a � FACILITATOR: S�'E' L-`�� I TEAM AREA PNONE: (5031 I tONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIOMAI REQUIREMENTS Minirt�um,lot size�;�'sq. ft. Average lot width: sv ft. Maximum bui ing height: � ft. Sttbacks: Fron�%� ft. Side N � ft. Rear�ft. '''LCorner u r ft. from street. M a x i m u m s i t e c over age: � % Minimum lan dscape d or na tura i vegetation area: � � % [Refer to Code Secdon 18.�� / � ��z �_lc ce,�' G�e�e v ✓6 5,r�, u�r� qer.c-� �o� � �!i'(� ?"�, �C;.e��f�.cc �,�.i t( �e�c4 �a G�e ves ADDITIONAL LOT DIMEHSIONAL RE EMEMTS � Minimum lot frontage: feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partiti n must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foo� wide access easement. The depth of all Iots shall t exceed 2� times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1� times the minimum lot size of applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Secdon 18.164.060-l tsl CITY Of T16ARD Pre-Applicatlon Cortferonca Not�s Page 1 af 8 NON-{�sltl�oU�l�p�llatlao/�l�ul��p��roa�uS�etle� � , � � Pos�t-it'" '+np requeat pad 768.1 ROUTING - REQUEST Pleas � ,Q, ��i READ 10 � ��i 1 � �� ❑ HANDLE � r� 7•Z$ U ` ❑ APPROVE � I and � L-I FORWARD I ❑ RETURN ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD ❑ REV W ITH ME Date � � From (� /� � � — v�C;�(..-/ � v SPECIAL SETBACKS � Streets: n G� feet from the centerline of � : Established areas: � feet from � Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. � Flag lot: 10�FaQt side yard setback. (Refer to Code Secdon and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDIN6 HEI6H ROVISIONS B ildin H i h i n - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: '� � A maximum buildii floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; :- All actual building setbacks will be at least half(�1,) of the building's height; and : The structure will not�ut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Secdon�8.0201 ` PARKIN6 AND ACCESS i � ,� e.v 3�i x -- s� so� �6 v�6 Required parking for this type of use: /,CkB.'`- �zs �'�" � � �� f-� Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): - `� Secondary use required parking: D�� 1 � « �� e��- � u��-�� ,�. Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): � `�5 "� `z`'�a � No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. i ,, , Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: � :- Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. � Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: ;� : All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available uporl request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile tra�c and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. •� / Minimum number of accesses: �h� Minimum access width: � i Minimum pavement width: �� All driveways and rking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing ar s: [Refer to Code Sectlon 6 and 18.1081 � ____ _ _---- - —- - - � CITY OF T1GAR0 Pro-Applicatlon Comeronca Notes Page 2 of e Mow-e•:ir•.u.i�riuc.n•.i�i�..i.�o•�.rm.e�s•cn•. WALKWAY REQUIREMEHTS Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps. or elevafors of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required • access and egress. Walkways shail provide convenient connections behrveen buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shoufd be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. � (Reter to Code Sectlon 18.108.0501 LOADIN6 AREA REQUI ENTS Every commerci or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space s and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Secdon 106.010-0901 --- — _ CLEAR YISiON AREA --- - - _ — — ------�--__ --- -_ _--__ - - The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. �[Refer to Code Secilon 18.1021 _____ �--_:- --- _ __ FFERIN6 AND SCREENIN6 In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts betweert adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas � along certa�n site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer � � areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achiev@ a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be � � required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only,' � be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer areal materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. �, ' [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 `� i ` The requir d buffer widths which are applicable to your propos area are as follows: ' J � / � a feet along north boundary. � v feet along east boundary. , �� feet along south boundary. �� feet along west boundary, � In addition. sight obscuring screeni,ng is required along s'�ee'�"`'�o,��.�,s '�-o scvee�-� `�c� `� ��CI�+,�;� j o��o '�ce �ek:�� c3�1-�� v1.ew � s e�� R��.-r G-� �',�--�,4-�alt LANDS J -- - -- _ _ Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 4� feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further info�mation on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include speciai design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls. and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OF T16ARD Pre-Applicatlon CoMeronce Notes Page 3 of 8 Mow-�•:ir..n.i��ue�n•.rn...i.�e.uru..c s.eao■ SI6NS Sign permits must be obtained prio ' allation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. dditional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be • permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as p�rt of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for re iew before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Coda Sectlon 18.1141 \ � \ SENSITIVE LANDS � \ The Code pro 'des regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areag within the 100-y r floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable groun Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based o available information. HOWEVER, the res on�x to rep cisely identify sensitive I n r n h ir n ri i h r n ibili h li n . Ar me in h fi i i n n i iv I n m rl in i n I n bmi wi h h vel m n lic i n. Chapter 18.84 also provid s regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. i ni v mn ' ii ihin li 1 ; [Refer to Code Section 18 841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, rior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval st ndards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.6. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendation� for achieving the requiremer�ts of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. UNIFlED SEWERA6E A6ENCY[USN BUFFER STANDARDS,R a 0 96,44 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: `. The vegetated corridor shall be a minixnum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surfiace water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 13 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corrido� within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width o� the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. � Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permi�ted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: ➢ A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corrido� must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unlesg approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimiza disturbance to existing vegetation; and ➢ Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. CITII OF TI6AR0 Pro-Aqpllcatl�n C��eronee N�tes Page 4 tl i � N�M-��sl�aU�l��Ileatl��/�l��1�1��YUt�nt E�etln � I Location of Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development w ch creates muitiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corr or shali be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any � parcel to be used for the construction f a dwelling unit. [Refer to R$0 96-44/USA Reguladon -Chapter 3,Design for SWMI . ; TREE REMOYAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination o lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development eview, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the f Ilowing: := Identification of the locatio size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; � Identification of a program to s ve existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the re lacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: � Retainage of less than 5 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program accor ing to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; �� Retainage of from 25 to percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be moved be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; � Retainage of from 50 to 75 perc�ent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be remove be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; � Retainage of 75 percent or greate of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires nq mitigation; � Identification of all trees which are propose to be removed; and : A protection program defining standards an methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced ccording to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place a cording to the following guidelines: :- A replacement tree shall be a subst ntially similar species considering site characteristics. :- If a replacement tree of the species o the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, tha Director may allow replacement with a � erent species of equivalent natural resource value. � If a replacement tree of the size cut is not r sonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacem nt with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: %- The number of replacement trees required sha e determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size` the largest reasonably available replacemen� trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably locate on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be plante on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private pro erty. CITY OF T16AR� Pre-Appllcatlon Comeronce Notes � Page 5 of 8 NOM-6esid�oU�l�oalle�tlo�i�l�ul�,O�qrtv��t S�etl�� The planting of a replac,�.� t tree shall take place in a man��cr reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subs ction D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, � elect to compensate the City for its costs � rforming such tree replacement. (Refer to Cod�Secdon 18.150.070(D) SUBDIi11S10N PLAT NAME RESER Prior to submitting a Subdivi �on land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are r ir to complete and file a subdivisio�plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the fa ed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County SurveyoMs Offlce: 648-88841 —�-- 'e� ' NARRAi1VE -- -- — - The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. \ Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.321 -- .r - - `� ` CODE SECTIONS - \ _ 18.80 _ 18.92 _�100 �-�'18.108 _�/'�18 20 18.150 1 _ 18.84 18.96 �102 18.114 �/18.130 18.160 � _ 18.88 18.98 • 18.106 _ 18.116 _ 18.134 18.1 - �- � .164 _ ---- ._ . - -.. _ MPACT STUDY As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study I with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, � including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system � and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the � study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of � the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. � In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property � interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. � � � [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501 When a condition of approsral-reqaifes--trarrsf�r to ttie public of an interest in real property, the approval � authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Sectian.2501 EI QRNOODMEETIN6 ------ --------- -- -------- -- -- - ! The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site �� posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held �rior to submitting�our aqnlication or the a�plication J will not be accepted. � [Refer to tfie Neigh6orhood Meetlng HandouU ��, - - _ - - _ CITY OF TI6AR0 Pro-Appllcadon CoMeronce Notea Page 6 of 8 NOMa�sllntl�l��/Ilc�tl��/�U��4��pra��t S�ctln f � • __------- — -- — -- - BUILDIN6 PERMITS � Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued. Final inspect�on approvals by the Bwlding Division will not be granted untii there i� • compliance with all conditions of development approvaL _ _ _ ___ __� RECYC�IN6 _ - Applicant should ntact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Secd 8.1161 ADDITIONAL COMCERNS OR COMMENTS: � ,. /;� n. i L '"l�t I r�vt i,l r �Y' � c � V �DO ^ � C (��l- t/U e`�-'�1 'C� L � �� (�t�C�v� � �� u � J SC'_l�P�IO � � y .Q C' C � �✓'.fL O a e � � � PROCEOURE r�4dministrative Staff Review. l��° Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAI PROCfSS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: �qlications submitted bX mail or droAped off at the counter without Plannina Division acceptance may be returned. A�plications will NOT bQ accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Frida�s or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an a�,qlication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One f11• 8�h" x 11" map of a proposed proj�ct should be submitted for attachment to the staff report�C administrative decision. A�plication with unfolded ma�s shall not be accepted. CRY OF T16ARD Pr�-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page]of 8 MoMae:u•4u.i,�auc�a•�rn...i.,a.�srt..■�s•en.. J The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or ' protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard � f- c . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig available from the Plannin Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conferonc�and not�s cannot cover all Code requir�ments and aspects of good site planning that should appfy to the deuelopment of your site plan. Failure ot the statf to provide information required b�l the Code shall not constitute a wanrer of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospecWe applicant eitl�er obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask a�ry quesdons of City staff relawe to Code r�quirements prior to submi�ing an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thi9 pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following thi9 cvnference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division}. ��J PREPARED BY: L'l`�� l��.- CITY Of TI6ARD PUINMIN6 OfY1510N PHONE: (5031639-4171 FNC [5031684-1297 h:Uo91�1p�1tYlv�st�n\prao/-e.ast tEa�l��n��S�cu��:v�:unUn�n-e.n�l 21-A1�r-91 CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Conferonce Motes Page 8 of 8 N�N-��sl��otltl��Plle�tl��rn.■.u��.r.ru..�s.en•. • - 2 S t 2 i�� k 1i�� , ��'��'►�� _ ��.. .,, � City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES � ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (�c) ��►^� ��-°''�� A�1� to �� feet from centerline.l�''�'^� �'"�-`'�� (x) S�1 ��I �• to 2L' feet from centerline. ��`-� ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: (� ) � �— street improvements will be necessary along �+ �� A� (k) ��Z street improvements will be necessary along �"`' �� S�- (?�) Street improvements on G�l� shall include Z� feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 af 5 Engineering Department Section — � � streets, or in the Cen� ' Business District), necessary streF' �igns and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a twc _ ar streetlighting fee. (�y Street improvements on ��+�� shall include ` �D feet of pavement from • centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. {� Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. _ �T ere are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW ��_ N�� . Prior to i�w�.x..L � I�-M�TS , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: ��-) �2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers -- l��f� -- The nearest sanitary sewer line �p this property is a(n) inch line which is located in . The proposed c��v�(opment must be connected to a public sanitary se,wer. It is the d eloper's responsibility to �"� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Enqineering Oepartment Secuon ' �Water Supplv: _ � The �� Water�- Phone:(503) ��`�'`H�� provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your • proposed development. C�`�' w��- U�-� ��Es>> Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. ' RL-�J,i� /-� �T��1 Qt..R�� — ��llE►r..l f�.+�T> A��— . ° I�J�� A ibv�.1��N1 Arl��t� Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R8�0 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 EnginenNiq Department Section . � �65 percent of the phosphor contained in 100 percent of the � •n water runoff generated from newly created impervious su, ..:es. The resolution contains a pro. �n that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will • be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water , quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: � (� Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. ! � �SHq�.I. Q�� -' *. .Nf{� �)fs--fZ �N�x�-- �J�.-w USA-S 9cSl4n1 �c�.��-r. S,-pS � w�.,._. G� `�."..t �Rr=o,� F�- 'f� �T T� -«-�-� �5 ��rST�a�, C�/L►�r�-. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the pe�mittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. � Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engmeerinq Depanmem Section _. � NOTE: If an Enginee� � Permit is requi�ed, the applican .ust obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. • Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: � a�q7 ENGINEERING DE ARTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 h Voginlpattylpreapp eng (Master section preapp-r.mst) December 23,1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section _ .� ...� CITY OF TIGARD COtittiivNlTY DEVELOPtiIENT DEPARtMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CRY OFTIOARD ' The items on the checfclist below are requfred for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist IdentJfies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: ✓''� ►��' Date• �7 � `� APPUUTION & RELiTED �OCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKE ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) � B) Owner's signaturelwritten authorization C7 Title transfer instrumendor grant deed � D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 2-C� � Filing Fee � P b/S SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(5}/PLAN(5) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE �/MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showin�: No. of Copies �� 1. Vicinity map � 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10°/0) � 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds �� S. Locations of natural hazard areas including: o (a) Fioodplain areas o (b) Slopes in excess of 25°'a ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seaso�al water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (� Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive ,V1ap Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands a 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level a 8. Location of exisiing structures and their uses ❑ 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources �i_ 10. Location o� existing uti(ities and easements / 11. Location or existing dedicated right-of-ways �/ UND USE.tPPtIGT1pN J LIST PAGE 1 Of 5 . • �-�J B) Site �evelooment Pla idicating: . of Copies c 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties Q / 2. Contour line intervals [�%� • 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and . easements on the site and on adjoining properties d/�� (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements � on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension o �. The location and dimension of: � (a) Entrances and exits on the site � (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area ❑ (� Pedestrian and bicycle circulation o (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ � /_(.f� Above gLund utilities_ _.,_�_____��_ [g%~ "� 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: ~ (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent � property within 25 feet of the site =-- (b) Prvposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements ,� � � on the site --------� / �6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 1 PII/ �-f.___�_ _��---�.,�__�.__-.__. ._ . 7. Sanitary sewer facilities --------- -- --- ❑ ' 8. The location areas to be landscaped �� 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime / prevention techniques C�� 10. The location of mai(boxes ❑ 11. The location oT all structures and their orientation �� 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C� Grading Plan Indicatin\ No. of Copies The site development plan s I) include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings nd shall contain the following inrormation: 1. The location and extent o which arading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lin ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposa s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year�r the proposed site development a 2. A statement from a reaistered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and get�technical engineering report ❑ (b> The validity of sanitary sewer ar1� storm drainage service p�oposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ lnNO USE I�PPLlG�T10N J LI57 PAGE 2 OF S __., ..r . D) A� hi tu�al Drawin indicatin : No. of Copies - The site development proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicatin the square footage o� all structu�es proposed For use on-sit • 2. Typical elevation drawin of each structure � Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies L=�-J The landscape plan shall be d�awn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable di� 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings �� 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces o / 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials d�� 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: � (a) Soil conditions � (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ � Si n D in s: ❑ Sign drawi s shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code s part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building P �mit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Gene ation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminarv Partitionl�,lot Line Adjustment Maa Indicating: No. of Co ies P 1 . The owner or th� subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's auth 'zed agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50, or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ -�. Description of parcel loca ' n and boundaries ❑ S. Location, width and names , f streets, ea5ements and other public ways within and adjacent td the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent b ildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all wate courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" o greater caliper at 4 feet above around levef � ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25°'0 �, ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and uti ity easements ❑ i ]. For major land partition which crea s a public streei: (a) The proposed right-of-way locat n and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the prop sed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. �ny applicable deed restrictions o 13. Evidence that land partition will not preciu erficient future land division where applicable a LaND USe'.�PPLlGaT10N�LIST PAGE 3 OF S , I) Subdivision Prelimi�,ary Plat Man and pata Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 3 ,�0,100 or 200 feet to the inch and �,,,�ited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed na e of the subdivision ❑ � 3. Vicinity map sho �ng property's relationship to arterial and collector streets o , =4. Names, addresses d telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer nd designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of applicatio 0 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjace t subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcel of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines r lated to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10�o gra s greater than 10wo ❑ 9. The purpose, cation, type and size of all the foflowing (within and adjacent to th proposed 5ubdivision): (a) Pub(ic a d private right�f-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines o (c) Domestic er mains including fire hydrants o (d) Major power t hone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (fl Deed reseroations for arks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances o 10. Approximate plan and profil s of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes i�idicated on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water istribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and �e hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline pr�files showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision � o 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 1-�. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overf{ow ❑ 1 S. Location, width & direction of�w of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. a 1 �. The location o� all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at � feet above ground level, and the loc tion of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, inclu�ing the location of all structures and the present uses of the siructures, a�nd a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental inrormation including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) o (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision oi subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural ieatures including rocfc outcroppin , wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any o� the foregoing information cannot prac-�t'cably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application '�, ❑ , L�NO 115E APPLIG�TION J UST PAGE 4 OF i � � .. � J) Solar Access Calculat, .�s ❑ - K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:Vogin�pattyUnastersU<icl ist.mst ,�tay?3, 1995 t,�NO USE.�PPLIGTION/L15T PACE 5 OF 5 � June 1997 July 1997 ?�9�St ,s9� -- - — S M T W T F S S M T W T F S , -�- 2 3 -4 5 6 , Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) �Z- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 � 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 - 9A Kenneth 9A Too late Montgomery 10 Laurie Wall 635-9080 SDR 205-2374 10 Bill M. 11 Too late. 639-3453 15200 109th 11 Lewis Parsons, 639-7133 � 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ . - 9A Leslie Sieg 10A No Pre-aps. 639-4179 St Brian has Anthony's meeting. Church � � I I �3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 — 22 23 24 25 26 -- 10A No Pre-aps. Brian has another meeting. 27 28 — 29 30 — 31 i 1:33AM�nesday, July 02, 1997 � � , �� - i��►.,� �� r�� I � ��---_`-__--. _ _.� � ' - �a..� �.' _ �� /��/`/JO✓� pT�� / "(��l!f-j�9.{"I�r�-- -� �/ � � � � .�rloU ,,�� ,.c�P�o.��-t3. � ��r�4��q� Pl�s,� .►�,f��l �• s�,��.b�y�s�q�Q/Qrds �,�.��s � /�y�.�h l�k� � ��IQy�oAv9/�/ a// �./1� rvver�u/�c�"�� // � .. , Ju1 -02-97 08: 56A Mike George 503-579-4308 P_O1 '�'�`'`�' � ��1{ -7 � l � ��i. . �1�t-G' 13u�lders, ��rc. P.O. 8ox 231165 Tigard, OR 97281-1165 Phone (503) 579-4236 Fax (503) 579-4308 Date: ..... ��-� .9. ..7. ... ... ........ To: �i..��.. ..:..�. ...fi�.��-:�..�L�� q� Attn: -��l.!�...TY.�',��/..�:..�f.-.�i 1� �G�Ni4�v- From: 5�../.�t.�� S..C.. .`c.�!� � A l �+-� r � � �� 9 Comments: � �,q�..t 5 ...... ......... ... ......... ............ ......... ............... ... ... ..................... ... ... ... ... ... ... .�i.s...��...�-...�o.�-,�..�.. .....� ..�r.-�� ..�.�...�-� .... ../.'�':t"/S.!.!?,! ...../'�7';�C. �... .��!.. . 9.�'�'s":,[..`�.'.�^...� .j'f�D�� / ..�:!,?'.P'.!.�.�'!. .. jf�,��!... �°.'.r/,,.'!.e,r,r+,,-,r!�/.h✓. .°j. �.. ... ... ... ... ... ... / ... ... ... ... ... ... J�.�r.�.�.�s... ... ... ...... ...... ... ...... ... ... ... ...... ... ............ ......... ... ..................... ...... ... ...... ...... ............ ......... ... ............... ... ... ......... ... ... ... ...... ... :�.,1�.'-e:....�_.co,y ... .`'�.-- ............ ....,, ... .� ... ... ...... ......... ... ... ... ............ ... ... ... ... ......... ... ... ...... ......... ...... ... ... ._. .......................................................................................... ......... .................. ... ... ...... ....................................... ... ... ...... ... ............... ............ ... ... ... ............ ............... ... ... ........................ ......... ... ...... ... ........................... ... ..................................................................... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..................... ... .................. ... ... ... ... ............ ... Ju1 -02-97 08: 57A Mike George 503-579-4308 P _ 02 JIfL-U�-yi W�.11 U��uS LHlYU �"�tL�l•flClYl t,Ul�w rnn ir�� IJVJVVI "�7v � . ... �_ . �$b�?1�r 233 S.E WIISH�NOTON STttEFT,F{��BpRO.OREC�ON 87123 PHOKE: I503)Bd&t08� Gq7(: (Sp3)ggS-764B , FAX TRANSMfTTAL �o: :� �� —2 —� 7 DATE: � - FIRM: FROM:� �� ,/� FAX NQ: ' a�l FAX N0: 3 1-7646 RE: JOB NO.: COMMENTS: �� , ; cc: �AX NO: FAX NO: We are sending z totar of� es, ;�; thi; co�,or she�T. Ptease noC thQ above receive a12 of the Qnclosed pages� � �Y Pe►$a��f you did not NOTE: Land Dovp(oprnent Consultar�ts yviU rlot be hald liablo for any discrepArtcies durin� iransmiss�on on plans, maps antJ drawtin9a. �p�ss of suCh items yyi1�De rT1diICQ 3nd should be requested if�pt rk�ived wilhin a!ew davs. k.. , . _ . .;__� , � - �; MEMORANDUM � _ ! To: Biil Monahan � From: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner � RE: St. Anthony's Church, parking lot expansion Date: June 24, 1997 � The following is an overview of the process and requirements for St. Anthony's Church to pave the parking lot across from the church and use it for parking: Required review: The proposal exceeds_the threshold for a Minor Modification because it will result in "A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off site traffic would be affected" (18.130.050.B.5). Because the proposal is not a Minor Modification, it is a Major Modification which requires a new Conditional Use permit to be granted. I suggest applying for Conditional Use approval for a parking � : facility vs. a church because the setback standards are less restrictive for a parking facility. The process required for Conditional Use approval is: 1. Attend a pre-application, 2. conduct a neighborhood meeting, and 3. submit an application. Staff will then review the application for completeness and when complete, schedule a hearing before the Hearings Officer and prepare a staff report. Improvements: The following improvements will most likely be required: Screening of parking from adjoining properties, paving and striping the parking area, improving the street frontage to include curb, gutter and sidewalk. A complete list of requirements will be provided at time of fhe pre-application. Phasing: Phasing of the imorovements is not permitted, however, the applicant has 1 1/2 years from the approval date to complete the improvements. The project will not be finaled until a(I improvements are complete. Time Frame: The estimated time frame for Conditional Use Approval is 6-8 weeks from the date the application is deemed complete. This does not include the pre- application (approx. 1-2 weeks) and additional time if the application is not complete when submitted. I will be in attendance at the meeting on Tuesday at 2:30. If you foresee additional questions that I have not addressed, please let me know so that I can be sure to address them at the meeting. :� . , -� � ¢�� . � �� ' �\ t'. l� �, z � �v � � . �� _ � _ �- --� ;� , �- --.__ _ -__ Pq��. Gf4,,T � .�-_ � I /, �f� K _v�I � —_"___..�._. .. � e � � • � ' i y ij -- ;i i i � � � . � w��l� � t`� �2L✓I l� ��P�tr'Yfr- ! � �U 1 R�o�. �mp�ve n1i►1`�j / � - ----____---- --- ------------ -- -__ _ _ _ __.-- --- _ _ _. , - �; ,. --- -----._�_ - --------- - �� .r :;.--�----� . . . . t�.b: ,. . . , .i, . � . .�v ' . . . ' - . . t. -".y' ��_'._.«�«.�...'"__�_"_ . . ..�....�._��_.___. . �_��.�.�._. . _`__— _-_... ._ ..__.___—___—.��_`__' _—'___.... ` r._��..�..._.. _..." �____. � ..__".` `_�—._.. _� __ _ . ._._ __.r_..�____"__ �.�ry�-r . - .. . . . ,.7 � ;w . . � ...-.��_.�._—.—._._ _�_.._..._�__'"'__..'_ _._,..-.�'_._.r __"_'_`_'..�.__�_r..t.'.__._ 2. .. � . . � .. "'._T_'"' __ . � ♦" .. . " . �� _ '�4's.ti�' e ^ � SE I/4 NWI/4 SECTION 2 T2S R!W W.M. 2S I 2 B S� WA5HINGTON COUN?Y ORt60N SCA�E I"=100� � I 00 +�, P / 6.:39Aa °�� $EE MAP CANCEL�ED r�x wr� �� / oy 2s i 2ea ��..�:,,��_.�,�.�. PJ 47 /� �,�� .�,Zo,,�,��r,�., ��,_�, �� SEE M A P `L titi°� /,or �'° 2S I 2B6 e^' � /w� p �R � \��de � w '�'y ej9 � 3� �°� � �t� ' � � — �1 e�` S , � Z,o� ��,. T,Q r [�� 1�1 �r�7f-1 �i° � � �;' c 4 6 /' � �zs � � 5 2 � � .�� i �� =� ' � "' _� \ o��, �p( ` /+' � \ .�d 'r•l � � �d3' 1 ,�� N�e�� / SEE MAP A, as/�_ , 49� t�°��`� oy��v 2S I 2BC �� ~ \ 800 s2 I� � �Z ♦ � �Fri�' �y�� 44Ac. r?e� ��^', d /J�-..�1��I�1�Y J I I��oy" / 9 5� \ �,�P,:�!��'��I i i / tJ .•/ 400 ° "s,, p s / .33Ac. To. ��II.��:: � � ��,�� / Q�P� soi �c �� .��.da� ,� �oo *.�,� ^d�'{�F,� � �� .43Ac. 702 '/ 3�� e /�� .32Aa cM tliy�9J�y I» � �� b�T .B3AG Ch �� f�,1p ��o i •�� e'��u�'J � 3 / -._ � ry I r { k d � \tse .5 ��;n, � ��N r) J � J J 1 � ^ �\ �� a p ,�.•4�O1 °Q�r..�Q.+e � �� _ . i a . N ./7Ao. � z�• c i �'c '��' 900 ��L r 700 w. J'°� d� �°.;'�I► i' iu:�e/ � .�6At. s� • 600 t t- ,.�r,? � ,I� � .24�A�c � .3/At. a� ti `01 7�1 ~ � ./SAc ti-4�_h;ir' • � Mi�^ �� - J i $(00� .96Rc. d's�N ,► � +�„ra'. � 905 • `�!e� � .BB,ee. o� . ;J� � �'�► '2O'��' + +e � � ' SEE MAP �s1�^t:�� azQy„ ./3A�,e.° '�. � / / t+' ,�� 2S I 2AC "� '� '• Jroy` b �� ,� .0 '�LI i r� `�• J'�� /� (� ('`� .+'" � ��'y .76Ae. •y�ar '��_ ��0' �y�.�/ �i� �'� !'��L�1J ` yr �iP 'b / c�/,,• ;" 1300 � a'�' • �'� �J� r+! ��-�!, �'j Qo �4 .2lAc. '+r.8 � / °o 'd �� 1 1� -> �.� , i ioe \ +l "'%� � op ./7Aa 1400 �rq y � \�. �o, :' .29At. � r\+. • '� ' ,'� •, 4 � . ,ti c °re\ �� 2201 � .�e�°�1200 °'� �.o /� � i.soaa � �o :' .dSAe. �� i503 `� �T � �� x a r°e,+°<: � .r . :'J._ lJ�1 _ �O � �. l.f4dc. �: I .; - . --�.-.�=;r�: . . . . ; i. . - ,. .. , . __.. . . SEE MA� IS I 96Ct SECTION Z T'LS RI W W.M. wASNINGTON CWNiY OREGON � SCAIE 1"•100� S�W. � KATHERINE %v STREET s "°' """' � ( 288 ; 1 .�. ...�. .... , _ �.,_.., . ,,. • ° �,� .00 �� , ��;��a,�' .�.: ,a, � � 1 ��o � [stuc .114.� I �OQ � 4i2'I t .eDAV p�,�r. � 100 / I . � i � y .ss�e. �r .i�r•w..+c-r 1 � ��r- r7 ��j�� 8i�� . V' r1 L �. �7 17 � I� � t �8`_J �3 ' V •4i I _y: � w�.ca.o-.c n � ' Z ;�� K z A` F� :o ��L _ ' �� , �� \ i7 .; 14 ':; IS .�� -' °' � n �,�° 4�0 . � � H � 1 G �1 7 S ..�... " ,�� ;�Y 9 ' � �\ ' ' � �� u � .., � .e�. , � �= � � _ � , .�� ,_ � , � A D 1 7 1 O N ; , - '06✓F,�� •�°' 2 2 � . I � � 5 7,: 6 � fON ASSESSMENT -' oii, d I/a r e�. �f'� WXPOSES ONLI' < .;.o�. �.a�•• r.e�eh � ... . • .a.�� .. � .. .. �"' �.wcx � �" � DO NOT RELY OM •oo �,04 N�,��p R 7 H 7 1 C A R r:� Y J L L � FOR,�.or�� : ,�... 2 3 74 �rr •• . /• f -��-e... P Y00 � ' � M � R � /.!//r r� . - �� `` . .� ; �. , �ez�� ?�9 � a � b � -r i � ri ,`,�. .��,.,.:��.e� ` � �f�'K7� 5'�7c�. ,.�,\I io ..,.. � la i .�•�� { t { �E28 °j ^ [y �I�e(+�p c SEE MAG g e ,P !'1/�ml 1 a f) 6 I' - � �J r y..(ti r ry / � 2 4 1 3sA _ 2 }, � �ot lYl � JJ L. {J / •o° 4 t,?. ��M �� '' * / �, YS �°� � . V'.� /'' �� ;� SEE MsP I � N� _✓n�'� �, ; •-.-� . � y 25 � 2!6 � !IS � § / _ 8N O� ` .. .. �oCiO�= � Y. ro� , � Z B2hµ�. 922 B21 �y�� / � � 82a3'Pg 2 .'•o: I I• �' -'�F� p , / / � �sis �-g ' , � � �.:�_ �.. w, a.°'x�,� " '� J wi ,i✓e,a . .. �� 8� _ ', �_ , r�8i, (� ,;•• / � 813 �e v e1B4 , � �33• ✓�N d � 3 � � � '/.•� 1201y /ys. aiz' z � 3 / '� .r�.k'^ pti 819 Y eiiM� • • Z T S �� eoa a��-4° 9 i "•� .3c._. s �p eio�i�F �,�,� � ' '�o : S� Y I ' �. �.r. ' �'e� T �� S �2 eos q g � i2co'e, r�: ,,,�oo `�9[+„ � tr.c -/3 i 't • .� eoe Z i m eo' •,. �°G � �'O'� 'ST� 0 � 3 JT . �, ' ,. 4��,1202 'ay ' ' ,. FFr p z � �� r�k. '>. ,,,w �a, � � "os ' �' �w 19 ' � f, '�02 + ;, ° '3c t` � iF ��oo ��a e •�b� �V �4� SB 'A . ., ` 6 � c • ,� •� •��8••.y�ea• P� S'�!^ Y� ��4+•0 T! ` e� �� •�`y .�� SE� M4V ! ,- d� . 25 I 2BC IT r� (� ' 4•�~i p" SEE N4P 25 1200 E`t.� .�� . �y�,. TIGARD 2S I 2 BB . . /� , �`� . . ! . I . � . � R .� �01� �� 3i9 ��'� �S� ��- `3D � j� r1 . �� I �� V�� - 4� r � � �(�� G';U� r� rY� --_ ._ _ ��, " � � � c r��' �' ----- ----- `�� e�-!�`� a ��`T� �� t�'L-°��'� ��, � ,, � �� ,�z�� 1�� >�`' ,� d� r��,�' ��I o� ��.,..�� nq.�� `1 I �4�"``� b�i� � � � � r,,v� �F , s� e� __..-.--._ _ , _ . , , � �°' � �.� �6 S -��, �/�, /]�/�'� v'1 '�,�' O f��}�` a r�Ji QC��' �.�wk°� �' ��, �rn � G�i✓'`/l, f�,,�1��' „��'�'� �c,�� ,,,` ' � �,, - i^+� �j�(,�„"`� 'r � � ��n � �''/ , r , �. J r � ,� , �,� %.�.,��i l�l,��. k�� -� c� �.� �s�� r � .� • 1_ � .�k, ,%�� ALt�rf �Yt-L �n�17a.y . U � � C N�� ,.� ��`�g�'��/� ��'' �� .,� � -/ GIC� �'�s.r, /�5�er+qsr� _______�.,._ �- �+�t��c�,�dr:../6� 9 S�.�-- �-�'�a/G—¢� �j'r''> C-k w�r q/�i�,,,-� � �/� h Co o � Wc1 r �n��nc�i�� l c . ..��; ____ _ �� . ... .� , i — -Unirr:;�.�-c� � Gf 9�5 rv�r�;� � f��fqr� 4�i�rv�., .-��✓ � � i.� 93 _ - - �� f �� j ��to�d 4��a.� (��` �l'1�:� - ,� � ��' 4z-�' '� _ _ --__. ,. _ _ I ______ ,/!74',Di///OcY, C/�fGr,+�: J �� L 4•�cl�' (�`� � �i1Gi'�9Sf' /� �wl��(/�ly C/l?S� Iv° .�� ` °� l�A1 �il�rvHb o.�'�r c�� ,,cf//� (�✓l�f�,, . � �� s �Y / —� �� 6�/-� ;� � $l.or�� o�4cr-�s�,q � ff�fti 4-c�q, �� o�-� � -___r '� S'ff c �/4 t t.f�jt/��[ 9Y��L�'��. ?�� lfw'�a.� /h 9 /"N�S� v4L 4�t� 1 l I� Y / QrLq (,✓�� /�Cl!/l��. -�iRh�it��i �fl'n�'v '� N✓Y�j �y3 4�C.��.,y �!��i .. � J �' y� �G� �,�� G�M�I o f1^��rs�,� r� .�� _ _ ,. �` �` /� / -� I � �l�l ��G�T S c iiI �-,� _ 4� 4/�� A St�J �r f20 YI-/c�r�c✓`.��4� (iSL �j ?�O✓�l ��h�,�,� --- �� / u °� / /� �� _ �.6 /r�b�s�, r f�� l �' (� ` � o - - ' "J.. `�..� �/�dVG �I- /'�/�G � l0 i �I" � �6� /L1f/�'¢q� �✓ �p/ln,/V1,6v1 � � _ __ ., 5 �d o• li5�a�� .�� , � /�ccaa/1�o or� ��r Cv � co��%r,., �a� ��o,� �o f- a�-1-o� it►,bvs q .aw� � � P �'I° � �/�p�� O F' G�T'*ccj ��9G/� � /itryjl�'Y�' �/`r �4/!�� /-�,� �1M,�9��, 6F�o JE�q.�,�� -- a �� / ��p: � �j �a � /,�Gicc)5� /� ��1.�+.�4"�4Si'Pj / �� n r`� �Ps �� -��T�^� �¢�C �:��'Z'�4� S�9n d�:,, .� ! �� ,: : 'E� -�. . {� . _�...� . -_" x,� � _ � . .. . . 9905 S.W. McKenzie • St. Anthon � (Larry Nicholson Architect) ' � y s Kelly Center - SDR 26-81 2SI 2BD lot 48 & 49 � � CU 20_g2 St. Anthon MLP 9-82 Y's Church, tax lot 400 2S1 2BD lots 204 & 300 T�1 �2-33 Te:np classroom CJ 3-85 Cond. fJse for classrooms � . - - � G v 92-a�aaJ - � �,,,¢,.�c��[/�:� �� . '� j � ... . . . - . � � . t � . ��_��:'� /I �� -5�+�1 � . . . � ��:."::��: .. . �i�� - . � . � - . . . - . . ' . . . . . ... ' ' - ' . + - - . _ ' � • . , . ' � . . .j . . . ' • - . � ' � . . .. ._... _ :{ . ... . - . _ ' . • ... - . .. . . ' . � .. .. . . . .. .. ... � .... . . " . . . . .... . - ' . . _ . ' d ��,�" , - .,v,y�sU �S � �� P 47 , r� ��r SEE MAP Q� °� P i � tis c R 2S 1 2f38 � , ' ''o•w e�9 � �J�i � 48 •a�N, , e+' 100 ST� � � � ry A3fAc ^ .\ V . �j C,(� � r ��l JF� rrJ +14b~o `` �O ` ' i 4 6 � ��r 5 2 • _. ,. o � . Jc" ''� � \ 300 ' / .�''. /`r ��W �+ /19�c y � �y wn S'�y��rM �� • /: � a /i o /j ;h � ~ / ' s lv - 49 � , .r�a: ; 51 `� / eoo r � �` . �.`a ��,,� � l rr�r��/1 L��. q� ^ , �? � p' ' ►O •f�Q O ys�•� . � I / P �, .3.'AC o� r �� ! /�C ; ^o`, '•o • � .� 500 's� a• :+� °:' 9 �'�.r �� .32Ac °N M' �� °o �•�� i q 4 �jf: � ` 702 °s�a �°` y �e� / .85Ac d �' ' s°ry�•�o {" / J ,� I\'•��Y $ a��'i01 sT�s.,ti�i. -- 1�� / I\ � r� J r ) Y ti P /%AC � •. �� r; / , • 1 hJ�a i �Y J'N e� !� �� \`'+ r��g �oo �= . °•�� ' �seo Jr� �• `� �� '` / !oa- s '� ' . •e�� ,` r. .`l� ��" .lSAc, y ;r � .( .+ .fr'' �;,'� �� . 7O�c J�BT�� , +`�P' � ,�iooa <n. • �:� h r � � ��` S[:E M�P • (� � � , � ./:Af. O '�� L �M� � o` `� J�\�r> �\ 2e, `t ` Jd. �` � 10�13\ .w `". � i��,��r.. .o . �. � a In ro a� ►1 �-N � H C� � � w rt� ��G � � �5..�� ri�� K I - �� t-•c, ro � � �ro a o { '� rort�� v� � c� '' � � rna� .. � ' ' S1MtL Nm a � � � : ya j w g�� • �o n.o �n� � i y NH �oN N �nu n I N fr'H Q.� �n crt k � N �' c � J � � ° p tn it rt rrtr ;d d�'o r+ p' H � C� � �� i � �p�i O O W.ee Mm o ~ Tn.rn� .�+ n C�, ��J-�ho�v C�� _ � �c�5 SLc� %�G,��1�;� - � ;, � r /= �� ' ' � �, � / - -�:� . � ,� , � � , , u � �- �' , � ,`� �� Z�NS� � . . . ..:__ . ._. � ��. ��-S�,�E:- ,�:�_ � � _._.....---== « � �, ;� .........�.�..�... � _. 3 _ , � � . . ._�._ �. . . tl Y ' �° - � v � � � ��A` � !�S . �_ �t �,. . Cc� �' _._., . `- � 3 �' 1 2 r _ � . . r , � � C � � • � R � � . I �t � � . CJ ` � � '� � _ � � c � � • c " tr� i � ��D� � � � �� v C ` ` ,..._�._-._-- ��"'�V 1'� . �r� �1�� I �`'�T`(N� Li.J t � � � � �4 � � � �';� � • \J. � / v � c G O' � a �� —��. / =' � o. �, 0 ��..��. ��. � � ; � / / �g�a �,c�.��. ��: .� .� � � �'�� a-�� / / , ' � . . / �.. l�� , �� zsi - 2�� ._...._ � // ° � � • . . �Z � � ► ��1, f o� � ' 4r . 1 ba� (b� . I � � , : ,-��.,4 y.L.°� �! ;;� ^ ,�• b.. ,� �7r. � 6Jr �� q,� , '��r- � . � , ,' � � ' : $ . . _ . . � . _ �� . W � . � � � � � � � z � �� ; � . � � � + - , � � .- � ��+ � - �� p � . � .; �'� � e� � ' , ; �� , -� � � � ; - --� 9 z � �y� � ,t �- � T F-- ; _ �' � �� - � � k � i i � � ' , . � ' � � � , � � #� � �-----�- �-.--,-. � I . L{ \A I i . � � . � L �1/+M� ,n ' . �. � �� _ � ; �3 _ _ l . �;�. . � � . r ��. � �� -,>. .,. :t�� ' •�h,��'y� , ..\ k - � • : , � ' _ �� .. � '-j1 ``r •i 4, �� '��`'��11�� 't,-�'i,i,•�' �;�_� /, i t.. _ + _J.. 7 •.:i�1'.� r � �;��,� � .ti�i�,1� � � 1� � �� ` ., 7 \. _ .l�: � \� ,. � i.i`� � * 1 + . ��'` � � � l ��, � . , _ .. ;�;F:�w S .��: 'i'' � - 'r:a �: � � f ��W� � , �..�' , ' :.:X ' � � ��:; ,% � - :��: , ` ,;;� .°,,� � ;�t� w,. .. i ��..�:� ,. g f_= '.?.i..: .� ' -`.Li.� 4 �.J1 c �1 „y y�;"�: .� .��_ .3 � �..� \,'. "�-�.-�_'� � � . g Y: . �� •i/� .� . .� . I � 1 �� :+F.� �i. �.` � N s .�.��'�>.� "%, , ' ; � ,� ,�r�,.na, � � �`� �.y �+,1��R , i �, �_ :,�t :'�:.,: ,. � ` •.�� . J �P9 �'a. � � `� ,.. ,� ,, +�� ,'-F � � ,.� :c'`.n - i i Yx�!: ,iy�y:,*.� "; �C'��`,.�' _ ; �`. 'r�� 'M �• ,` _••'}�'��1'� � rj r �'}�,�f ,�,� ...�� 4 d . � .a'=�,'� \�� -�`� ' Y / , U �y� r�A\, - 1 'i � �' . '. .,�� . ,'c •��}��L K�`p•� �!.. / , r� ��•..'.. ;�f�:''..ls'� • � . ` � �. 7Y��..;j. •� �r•. . � ,�",�, . Mc '�. ,� . . �` .i- :p �.T' , . 1� � � `• • h � r � �',M`-�r,� � ' �/ G �{�� Ywk1. •1 � � I ' /� �: � "' Y � � / � j, . / Y " / � � +�� O � ��.�"'` : � ' � � . � � � � . ' � � , � �y�� i . ��,44 •K•1�. � ��' \v / �,�� . . ' .I..r� �'�� •M . . � � ! � r � . ► � r, �� q � h � ro1�i � � � l� 1 �� _, �_' � . /�� 9� ,: ,� ► � ,oq 'I�I � , , ......�--.-- / � � � � , , � � ...,i�� s3Nl � � '�� " _.�_.-. �' _ � � � �i � ' � � -� �i �d��(�� _.� �- S51 oy , � _ �� 291 � ' g S Z — r SZ �1l� ' �°l� -L�- ��o '��i..� :.�.5 Nc�j�}-�� oG�3� � �� : �� --� �� ' � a . N , I � � ,5 1 1 o�L'i�` � � � � . uJ L� \ � �' �v� � � �, � � � . � ' J � `J � � � '� � ��. . . C /�'� ?��% �� , b C?�f� �.'.� . �,�2<v�y/�� S %°�� - -�,�� ,� �oy�'�' �S !�� 4 • / B4o 8 S 96 p �p N 3e�" _ s�o �� `a� �QD � �. �',o . . 3 12G0 'o• �� .�� '3s a s��Ow w .22 AG F � �`a / �?s9 m 4� �+y ;� ss 3�� ti �s '� '�'?► ;, �a •�� o � �o, q� •�� 0 � �p F 4 � ;, ^., i 202 �°ee . c i ro ��•` .23 Ac. ? ti °o,� sp �r� � o i � � s O o� \,i�`11 �,s / �, �'�� s�� 8QC � �. � 'L � c� � 'r3 . �G� ti� '�C �Y r ��DO Ss, ��4� S�A�o, d �o �-4� ��o�, ? ,�°� /8Q � � >�� ,s / `�ie, �S�p � � ��, S � �y � � s�a°9�si �►.,� �os �d. !� �` / ee �,d � F / ti ,��' /e0 pr� 1� `s�o '�? � .\ � � � p� �• a,,. � � �Qv 9 �e `• i � .cy ��. ,�sg ,�a• �� ,�A � � � . �r •�� \ d � / 3 Y� � 4•� ` / C� r�� c`� � ' Z � �q'� V � �a� � 0 �°� p' s�E !�a� 2 s { a eo "•'� � \ �v � • � � �� • � � � � � � �a�Y'�r... .�,...- .. .-. . �'-'rr.t- � .. . . .. . � . .. . .•� _v=� _ - 'i . � -. . t. ' .. . � . � � �¢f„�. -l�A•-vy,. -�a�. . � ^�� ` J _ \ ` / ` � � � � �� , �r �\ J\ �/ i ` � �~�_ O � ( O`` ` � � �M'Il � � � ♦ �� / / . � �� e � ' � • Q : t��a+-�� / / � 0�/ \� � % � - + t� � °�� 04 � � / } o . � � � �. , � . •. '� � � � r i �� i � - : i � ' � ��' / � � �p � :� p�j �� °< < �i� / a e � � � � �%� � � � Q a � � ° � � � � �I --\� � l� ii � ` , ! � � � � , � � � �i �� x � '�� f � /�� } � 3 � �/ Q , a �_,.�� . ��. � / �fi� r..�� . . 1,' • � � • � Ceccacci Associates � '� EnvironmentalPlanning ' � ,: � Urban Design . ri Landscape Architectuce , ,�. �a � . ... ;�.,,�,-r.>t ..s,.;,,.,.a��;,g<<.,,. . . ��-� � C I TY O F T I GA R D � 503 241WO9 gon 97201 � ,�.'�v'_, "� ' � Fax 223-6201 ^ a,ru ` > _ PRE—APPLICATION C�NFERENCE N�TES Pdcpalacci ^ (Pre-Application Meetin Notes are Yalid ior Six (6) Months) . -- -- - _ _ NON-RESIDENTIAL � � PRE-APP.MiG.DATE: �'�9�Dd � ^" AAFf AT PRE-APP.: T�/.7� � _ r . APPLICANT: ��-� AGENT: � Phone: ( ) Phane: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: _ ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: Sov{�c4S� E'o��cr a� S�' �Li�.Sa•� -7�.G�q�� 9�J��j s6j � TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): �S/ D.Z 3� T�C �Of' /6 0 0 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: ��►��o�4I U-S-� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: �d�Q��,dd�rO�QI f�9rk;�a �t�L /.�.�� /7 �,O9�S / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / MAP DESIGNATION: �- S!S (�aw c�C�ri�fy ��,4�� ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: �" ys C.I.T. AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: (S03) IONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS NI� MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Av e lot width: ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: ft. S' ft. ft. . from street. MAXIMUM SITE E: % Minimum landscape or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18. 1 AOUITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS N/A MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2%z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1 Y2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 (1TY OF TIGARD Pre-AppGc�don fonference Notes Page I o(9 NOM-Aesden�ul AppliatroalPl�nnm�Dnamn kctan ' � � PECIAL SETBAC REETS: 3� feet from the centerline of G�9� ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Referto Code Chapter18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDIN6 NEIGHT PROYISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: _ ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area �atio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half('h)of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.1 PARKING AN�ACCES /S/�cc�-�►.ej.azsr�s/�7/J19iil 9lr�i+s1� 4��,��,,�) D parking for this type of use: /� ��9ces �.��«. /.7s�qhi'n��9fS�M.�� Q��CMqiC/ Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): � �� Q�k��SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: S��rG Pa�king SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): �� on q �a� S'�� S'�1N0 MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED �t�u� AS COMPACT SPACES. �^�r,,,, �y PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: G° r �'°I ➢ S tan dar d par king space dimensions: 8 fee t, 6 inc hes x 1 8 fee t, 6 in c hes. �q�t � /�. �,�cs�° ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0401 Handicapped Parking: � All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and ��5 '°� in convenient locations. �� I �Minimum number of accesses: � Minimum access width: 3° Minimum pavement width: .zS�� All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.1051 '� (ITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliution fon(erence Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Aesdmu�l Applwtion/Vl�nnn�Di+isiai kttion � - WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Nl� WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Secbon 18.705.0301 LOA�ING AREA REQUIREMENTS N�-� _ Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shaH be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.I65.0801 �L ISION Q City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETVI/EEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting streeYs functional classification. [Referto Code Chapter18.7951 BUfFERING ANO SCREENI CREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. � . [Referto Code Chapter18.7451 � 6"�0 �� ` �✓`�<�� I� �� y'� Z� �� ailC,� y�''�Cf 4�s /'�.Sr��I�9�U�s. The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are a�plicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANOSCAP TREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detai�ed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.7051 UTY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliwtion(on(erence Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-6ademul Apphauaa/Pl�nnin�Onhion kction � S16NS . SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign PeRnits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Altematively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings O�cer. [Referto Cade Chapter18.1801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNS OR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODP , NATU DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25_ P CENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive la s areas at the pre- a plication conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the res onsibilit to recisel ' nti n itiv lan r a n th ir bo nd ries is the r s onsibilit o th li nt. Area tin the finition f en itiv I n m t be learl indicated on ans itt with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides reg ulations for the use, protection, or mo fication of sensitive lands areas. E IDENT AL DEVEL PMENT I PROHIBITED WITHIN FLO PLAINS. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7751 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tig Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be b ploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for a ' ving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGEHCY[USAI BUFFER STAN OS,R a 0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACE TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wi e enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR HALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of t e sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the wid h of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a ortion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area o the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachm nt shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of he vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In ny case, the average width of the vegetated corndor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Ve etate or d r: NO structures, deve opment, nstruction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of a kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protecti provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: ➢ A G �lVA OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the <way or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet ! from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and � bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and ➢ WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. ' Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application fonference Notes Page 4 of 9 NOX-Aesdmli�l Appl�lan/Fl�nnin�Dnisbn kRion WATER RESOURCES OVERlAY OISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development tion of significant wetlands, streams and riparian co�ridors identified in the y of Tigard Lo Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable econom' use of property whi establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetl nds and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance wa r quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank ero on; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and e ucational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbo�' provisions of the al 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetl ds and riparian comdors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-b aring stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" b the Oregon Department of Fo�estry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic fee second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard in ude FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIB ARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH�EARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigar include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and ce�tain s�ort tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: � This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundar�' in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATI� RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ' y ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for ic�entified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Elipibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO�E ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTI�N, the applicant must demonstrate that th� riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; y That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 �egulating removal of native plant species; CIiY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliwtion[onference Notes Page 5 oi 9 NON-Aesdemi�l Appliolion/Pl�nnm�Dniswn kaan � ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Secbon 18]911001 REE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMEN """ i rtt PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; - ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: ♦ Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ♦ Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; ♦ Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50°/o of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; ♦ Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ MITIGATIO ��9��1�l� EPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: Y A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ♦ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1 (ITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appfication fon(erence Notes Page 6 of 9 NON�Aadmliil Appliatan/Plinnin�Dnuiaa kction �� e APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a naRative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Referto Code Chapter18.3901 CO ECHAPTE I 8330�c�d�a�u�� I 8.620��a r��n��s�e�� ✓I 8.765(oR-Sveet Puk��g/tn�ding kquiremen�) I 8.340�a�r:n�ntio�� I 8.630 rw�i�goM 5q��i c��o� I8.11 S�o��a�k�� 18.350�Me o��q s� 18.105µ��u�ua�� 18.780��1 _ '� I 8.360��o��c�� 18.1 I 0��d�,c�u��a� I 8.185 R��u�r�:� 1 18.310 n�a�eewsurKO�� I 8.1 I 5(oensiry C«�punoo�s) � I 8.790(�ree�emor� I H.3AO(loning M�p/Text Amendments) 18.720(oWg�ea�paobiury su�dud:) � I 8.795�r�,�a�«,�u� I E.3SS(Mixeb�ntous Permits) I E.��S(EnrironmenG)Perfornuna Shndards) I H.�9I(Wao�r Resouras(YVR)Overi�y Distric� �� I H.39O(Detision Milcing Proaedures/ImputiWd�) I H.�3O(Excepoons Ta Derelopment Svnduds) 18.798�Rksc(ammuniaoon Fzd�iues) I 8.4 I 0(�nt une Adjusmiena� I 8.140(�+�sco�c oYer�� IB.H I O(Street&UfiGry 4nprorement Shnduds) �8.42Q(L�nd Pu6fians) . �$.142(Home Ocwp�6on Pemiits) I 8.430(wbd�o�) L�I 8.745(W�aping 3 Saeening SGnduds) � IB.S I O(Residenoil 2oning Disaicts) IH.�SO(H�nufxwnd/Mobil Home kgul�oans) I8.520(eflnme�a�Ia�ing u�su�ar► I 8J55�nixed Solid WuWkryding Soonge) I 8.530(u�d�:c��1o�i�q oum�� 18.760(►�o�m�k��g S�m�uons) ACT STU part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the par4cs system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHB RHOOD U APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting vour a�plication or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighporhood Meeting HandouU SUBOIYISION PLQT NAME RESERYATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surueyor's Office: 503-648-88841 [ITY OF TIGABD Pre-Applicatian(onference Notes Page 10(9 NON Retdmud Applw�ion/Plinnin�Dnisioa knbn BUILDIN6 PERMI OR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being const�ucted, as proposed. Additionally, with �ega�d to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLIN6 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with P�ide Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 QOUITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: vS� O�� n (/SA Sc�vYCL rv�'di� �� « � S+�.r,�' q �� .��G 17�9� /1?+�5� Sfb i,/ .09/�S�%� �f �:KC�Si rlils PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. � Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Ap�lications submitted by mail or dro�ped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Aq�lications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridavs or 4:30 on other week days• Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 bv 11 inches. One (1), 8'/�" x 11" map of a proposed project shoufd be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision A�plication with unfolded ma�s shall not be accepted CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notet Page 8 of 9 MON-�ndmu�l Applic�tionlPhna��Dauian kaion The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard C'�� n�,'r . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLE E NOTE: The conference and notes cannot caver all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan.. Failure of the staff to provide information reguired b�y the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a .prospective. applicant either obtain and read the �ommuni Develo ment Code or ask an uestions of Cit staff relative to Code re uirements rior to submittm an a lication. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: ��/�' f�v �o�%�_____ CITY OF TIGARD PLA NING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON NOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-1247 E-MAIL (s�aH's fiRt nam�@ Cl.figdrd.o�.uS H:\patqlmasters\Pre-App Notes Commerdal.doc (Engineering section:preapp.en� Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY OF�IGARD Pre-Appli�ation Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 MON-Raidmlul App6atiaa/Myma�Oivuioa kttian CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- �plication conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: T�I�q�/,�r��4 Date: �.Z9' ob 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: � Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization � Title transfer instrument or grant deed � Written summary of proposal � Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) � Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). � Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) � Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.6.2.(e) � Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes � Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED _ In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): � Vicinity Map B� Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan 8� Existing Conditions Map L9� Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map O�Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan B�Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan �—/ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings t� Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings 8�Public Improvements/Streets Plan � 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES ZS� COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 '�_� i �,� _ �� " 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study , ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis � Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectura� drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8'/� x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). ��U � icinity M ��,.� �� ,ye./ �f�wi s �l.S✓6•.�,,�E/ � Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Ma � Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area _ ❑ � Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ � Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ � Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ . Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: . Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ � Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ � Location and type of noise sources ❑ � Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ � Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 � � Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map � The proposed name of the subdivision � � Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets � Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer tas apPiicab ❑ � Scale, north arrow and date ❑ � Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided � Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided la ❑ � Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intenrals for 0-10%grades and 5' interv s for grades greater than 10% ❑ � The purpose, location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the propose ubdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ♦ Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encu rances ❑ ♦ The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured a feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, a d a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ � Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ � Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetland and marsh areas � The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, d lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upo uch lots ❑ � If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably b shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application m erials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustm t Plan � The owner of the subject parcel ❑ � The owner's authorized agent ❑ � The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ � Proposed property lines - ❑ � Description of parcel location an boundaries ❑ � Contour lines (2' intervals for opes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ � Location, width and names f streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ � Location of all permane uildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ � Location and width of water courses ❑ � Location of any tree with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ � All slopes greate an 25% ❑ � Location of ex� ing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ � Any applic e deed restrictions ❑ � Evidenc hat land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ � Futur street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 ' e Developm nt�Pla � The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ � Contour line intervals ❑ � The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other pubfic ways and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ � The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ ♦ Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ ♦ Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ ♦ Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ � The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ ♦ Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ ♦ Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ � Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ � The locations of the following: . All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ andscape Pla � Location of trees to be removed ❑ � Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ � General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ � Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ ♦ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ � Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ � Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ � Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan � Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ � A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ � Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 GradinglErosion Control Pla � The locations and extent to which grading will take place � � Existing and proposed contour lines � � Slope ratios � i ities Plan � Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ � Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ reliminary or Drainage Plan , � The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ � Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ � Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ � Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Preservation/Mitigation Plan � Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees�- ❑ � Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ � A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings � Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ � Elevation tirawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings � Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i:\;cu rp I n 1m a s te rs1 re v i s ed\ch e ck I i s t.d oc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE-APPLICATION CONFEREHCE NOTES _�. ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Cltyo�f�gard,Oregon Development Shaping A Better Communit PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(sl: 2S102BB Tax�oas�: �soo s��ioo Use iyme: Parking lot The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: � SW Grant Street to 30 feet from centerline. � SW Johnson Street to 25 feet from centerline. � SW Grant/Johnson corner to 25 feet corner radius. ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: � 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW Johnson Street, to include: � 16 - 17 feet of pavement from centerline to curb � concrete curb � storm sewers and other underground utilities � � 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side �� street trees spaced per TDC standards. � street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF T16ARU Pre-Applicatlon Conferonce Notea Page 1 of 6 E�9�o�erla9 Se��rt�ee[Seetls� � 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW Grant Street (only if a driveway is proposed on that street), to include: � 20 feet of pavement from centerline to curb � concrete curb � storm sewers and other underground utilities � 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side � street trees spaced per TDC standards. � street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CIT1f OF TI6AR0 P�e-Applicatlon CoMe�ence Not�s Page 2 of 6 E��la��rlp!�ap�rmatSectler Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) �2.) Overhead Utility Lines: � Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Grant Street and SW Johnson Street (NOTE: Developer only has to be responsible for the frontage from where the onsite power is taken). Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to N/A: Parking lot does not require sewer. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: CIT110f TIGARD Pr�-Applicatlon Conferenc�Notes Page 3 of 6 Eall�s�rin,�eputment S�etlaa ` � All proposed development ,in the City shall be designed sucl- �t storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be reuuired to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite defention is required. The engineer must submit preliminary sizing calculations for this facility with fhe CUP application. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surFaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: � Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicadon Conferenc�Notes Page 4 ef 6 Eill�eetiag�sputasnt Ssctloo . No T!F for a parking lof. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, e�. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cm oF ncaRO rre-aaniicanon comorence Noces Pege 5 of 6 f�/lusrl�!�e�utmeat SseUo� ' • � cases where the Ic �ey are working on has slopes �xcess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADINC PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPAREO BY: � � � z� � ENGINEERING D ARTMENT S AFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-7291 i�.\eng\bnanr�templates\preap notes-eng.dot doc Revised: April 21,2000 CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 E�llat�rl�!��paropent Seetlo� Rug 29 00 ,11 : 26a Cr -acci Rssociates 503-223-6201 p. l . .. ... . :.. . .. . . _., .. •. • .. . ... ., _., .. , _. . ... . . ..�.......... _v- .� . . • . � , � . ' ' _ • . - . .. :� FAX G4VER. SHEET . 2 pages inciuding Cover Sheet ., . . . To: , c.71/lLlf� ��"7��1K ��-"'��°`�'Z`� , , . Subject/Ptoject: 5�:..A�tr� .a�N. . �-hiF�-E-F ..,_ . . PA�'�=/n/� ��l�I�;�;J /c�NT.�,� Us��I f t�'• Dato: . .,. . . .. �.�� •,�d�. . , .. . . .. . . . _ , . � .. . � �'� ��f'"� Ni7�. �J�- �}`�� . '�, 2e''�`� --� s/� PL�t'�/ i!- �,r,��% . .,.. �G�' 'G��c.G� , . ., , .. � ,,. � . . -.�.. . _ . .. � ..:. _ .. . - CECCACCI ASSOCIATES � � Enviro�nwntat Ptanninp . .. Urban Dospn ' � . � - � Landsc,apa /►rchft,�turo . 021 S S.W.Gibbt SV�t P�tJand.OA 97201 . � " - Ph: (503�tt.3702 Fa�c (503}�6201 .. . . . _. , .. , . . . ... , .. . . .. �- . . : . - . . _ - - �� . � � � A . ' � ' . N �"= yo o � , . Q �X15TING ROW � PROPaSED ROW . . � J �^ • � 5' � � �j��'{N��'��'.1 � y`. {0 RED SUNSET RED I"IAPLE � � � -- — -- ----- co 5 VAR REDTWIG DOGWDOD ---- — -`-- — � � I � . + ( I m !m' 20' N , � . N 5 PARNEY GOTOIVEASTER ' 1 i � � , � � II . C N 8 WESTERN RED G�DAR � I � / � . � � I I II • I ' ' I . ' ' I t N ' ! OJ . ' . I I � � EXiSTING 50LID FENC� AT NEIG�IBOR 1 w m . , � ' � .0 i z , a 5 VAR REDTWI� DOGWOOD ' � � • =� � � . t + � �� " � � �� ' - ' � 4 �U COTONEASTER DAI"il"fERI �' ' � � p � � 1 . �0 - � 5A PARNEY GOTONEAST�R I Z 5 GAL. � I • Q � � � � � � � . � . � . N �1l .� � i .r � o C • E • C • C • A • C � C • �� w- Q215 S.W.Gibbs SI. Portland,Or n 97201 , �. �r A.��-�Ny ��v��-�N . �° � . --- __.._ ._ __ __ � ��q.r,J , U�EG-��'V Q ' • ' .: . � August 28, 2000 Fr. Leslie Sieg CITY OF TIGARD St. Anthony's Parish 9905 SW McKenzie Street OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Father Sieg: I am writing because we have not been able to make phone connection. You inquired about construction of the St. Anthony's Church overlflow parking lot at the corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. � The City of �igafd granted approval, subject to conditions of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 97-0007) that was final on November 19, 1997. Approvals of conditional use permits are valid for 18 months. As you can see, the Hearings Officer's approval has long since expired. To re-establish approval will require a pre-application conference, neighborhood meeting, new application and approval by the City Hearings Officer. From the time of a complete application, the review and approval process will take six to eight weeks if no appeals are filed. Approval standards have changed since the parking lot approval in 1997. This includes new water quality requirements by the Unified Sewerage Agency, as well as, new City standards. Much of the planning and application materials that were used for the parking lot should be valuable, however. We would advise that the new application incorporate the conditions of approval of the 1997 approval, including those in the staff report and those added by the Hearings Officer which addressed neighborhood concerns. Pre-application conferences can be scheduled two weeks in advance. Planner, Julia Hajduk and Engineer, Brian Rager will be able to provide you the necessary information to complete an application. Both can be reached at 639-4171. We look forward to your completing the project. � Si�erely, � [ / 1��,�c.�/��i -t�;�vi��i" James N.P. Hendryx Director of Community Development i:\curpin\dick\letters�st.anthony's church overflow pkng.doc ,i c: Bill Monahan M ��dl�� Brian Rager, CUP 97-0007 Land use file , , -�� ,��, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, 9R'97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 � August 28, 2000 Fr. Leslie Sieg CITY OF TIGARD St. Anthony's Parish 9905 SW McKenzie Street 4REGON Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Father Sieg: I am writing because we have not been able to make phone connection. You inquired about construction of the St. Anthony's Church overlflow parking lot at the corner of SW Johnson Street and SW Grant Avenue. The City of �Figard granted approval, subject to conditions of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 97-0007) that was final on November 19, 1997. Approvals of conditional use permits are valid for 18 months. As you can see, the Hearings Officer's approval has long since expired. To re-establish approval will require a pre-application conference, neighborhood meeting, new application and approval by the City Hearings Officer. From the time of a complete application, the review and approval process will take six to eight weeks if no appeals are filed. , Approval standards have changed since the parking lot approval in 1997. This includes new water quality requirements by the Unified Sewerage Agency, as well as, new City standards. Much of the planning and application materials that were used for the parking lot should be valuable, however. We would advise that the new application incorporate the conditions of approval of the 1997 approval, including those in the staff report and those added by the Hearings Officer which addressed neighborhood concerns. Pre-application conferences can be scheduled two weeks in advance. Planner, Julia Hajduk and Engineer, Brian Rager will be able to provide you the necessary information to complete an application. Both can be reached at 639-4171. We look forward to your completing the project. Si�erely, ^ � % / �i�i��L.�/\��/ -C��-�� v'/� James N.P. Hendryx Director of Community Development i:lcurpin\dicklletters�,st.anthony's church overflow pkng.doc c: Bill Monahan, Matt Scheidegger, Brian Rager, CUP 97-0007 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 � � c � ti'� St_ �nthont� Catholic Church �:- 9905 S.W_ McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97223-5198 September 21, 2000 R�C� ��p �� 000 James Hendrryx Director of Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jim, Thank you very much far your review of the issues surrounding the Conditional Use permit (CUP 97-0007)to approve added parking for St. Anthony Parish. Your consideration of the extenuating circumstances is greatly appreciated and will hopefully save a great deal of time and effort in avoiding a repeat of the application process. To help assure that none of our neighbors would feel slighted in this process. I went ahead and invited all those that would have been included in an information meeting this week to explain that we had now received clearance form DEQ and hoped to proceed with our scaled down version as soon as feasible. Only one neighbor attended that meeting and was very happy to learn of both the DEQ letter and our plan to proceed with the parking lot development. I will direct my Business Office to initiate a contract with an architect to begin drafting specific plans for this parking lot in anticipation of applying for a Building Permit. I will make sure that the architect consults with the city engineer to review any code or other changes since the initial permit was granted to assure that our plans comply with those. To clarify my understanding, the clock began on July 1, 1999 for the 18 month period of the permit. It would be my understanding that if we are not in a position to initiate substantial progress on the sight improvement by llecember 30, 20U0 that St. Anthony's would need to request an extension of this permit that could be granted for one year with a fee of$150. If these understanding are correct, I will proceed in this fashion. Again, my thanks to you and your staff for all of the assistance that you have provided. Sincerely, i��"�`� � ��'`� Rev. Leslie M. Sieg / Pastor C: Barbara Davis - Business Manager Telephone (503) 639-4179 E-Mail: St.anthony@ juno.com Fcax (503) 624-2364 I September 20, 2000 ,,_ . :c .- cmr oF r��a� Father Leslie Sieg St. Anthony's Parish OREGON 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Father Sieg: A conditional use permit (CUP 97-0007) to apProve added parking at the corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street for the St. Anthony's parish was final on November 19, 1997. One of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to provide evidence of the State Department of Environmental Quality �DEQ) approval for contamination cleanup because of contamination arising rom the adjacent Sunset Fuel site. As you indicated, your parish did not receive notice of the DEQ approval until approximately two weeks ago. The DEQ approval was issued July 1, 1999. Because approvals are valid only for a period of 18 months after the decision, and your parish had no control over the DEQ process related to contamination on the ad�acent property, the City of Tigard will recognize the 18 months clock as starting July 1, 1999. Since you probably will not be able to have engineering plans approved soon enough to meet the 18-month deadline from the July 1, 1999 date, I would suggest the parish request an extension of the approval period. An extension can be granted for up to one year if: . There are no changes to the original site plan approved by the Hearings Officer; . The applicant can show the intent of initiating construction within the one year extension period; and . There have been no changes to the Comprehensive Plan and ordinance provision on which the approval was based. The request should be accompanied by an ,exp lanation of how the above factors are met. The fee for such an extension is $150.00, I would encourage the parish to make street improvements especially on the Grant Street side since that is where parishioners would be walking fo parish activities. Sincerely, ,r U�� G��( James N.P. Hendryx Director of Community Development i:\curpinldickUetters�st.anthony's church#2.doc c: CUP 97-0007 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 i/ I, CITY OF TIGARD December 29, 200o OREGON Rev. Leslie M. Sieg St. Anthony Catholic Church 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223-5198 Dear Rev. Sieg: As per your request, this letter provides permission to extend the approval period for CUP97-0007 for 1 year from the date of this letter. Also, improvements of SW Grant Street have been substituted for that of SW Johnson Street. The required wavier of remonstrance provisions are to be applied to SW Johnson Street in lieu of SW Grant Street. Please forward questions regarding compliance with this or other conditions to myself or to Permit Coordinator, Sherman Casper. Sincerely, '�'�' ------ --� � Math'ew cheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpinlmathew\Church letter.doc Enclosure: Receipt c: Ed Ceccacci 0215 SW Gibbs Street Portland, OR 97201 CUP97-0007 Land use file - , Jim Hendryx, Director of Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 E. #� � ._ .* :■ • � �� - - "�i --_ - ■ ■ _ . - _ __ -� _ �, _ _� . , . . ` ,,,�� _ !U-i �.�i '`u�t,�'ii�i�' :!I�:.,'l '!'i�?�rd, Oregon 97�?3-5198 ��EB4��;;u December 27, 2000 �,�r.. � 7 zoan James N.P. Hendryx rC�N�n�tnv;;�� r,F��;=, � Director of Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jim, In response to your letter of September 20, 2000, St. Anthony Parish would like to apply for a one year extension of the approval period for our conditional use permit (CUP97- 0007). Other than changing the improvements from Johnson St. to Grant St. (as suggested in your letter), there are no changes to the original site plan approved by the Hearings Officer. We intend to advertise for bids in January with construction to begin as soon as weather allows it. To our knowledge, there have been no changes to the comprehensive plan and ordinance provision on which the approval was based. Included is our check for $1 S0. Please let me know if there is anything more I can do to get this process going. Thank you for all your help. � � . Rev. eslie M. Sieg Pastor ��, �,. �•-��.:,� �•:, ��": <<:�l�,�pf��orl< �.�(i_�) �_�9 �I 1�9 1�'-1�. �,.:�u��; c..1 �.:_��1 Receipt #: 27200000000000001868 �d'°✓ , /�f,_,.,I�. Date: 12/2912000 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEAIS, tNt Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due LANDUS an se isc.-15 .0 . 100-0000-438000 $150.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check ST.ANTHONY PARISH 0 12027 $150.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $150.00 � � 7-D D� r�� X��51o� ��9 0 �� , : �,.....�,,,�. . . _. � - � � /.;.. �i, CITY OF TIGARD Apri125, 2001 OREGON John cook 12314 SW Millview Court Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Zoning Across from St. Anthony's Dear john: Recently you asked me to check on the zoning of Bob Moore's property on the west side of Grant, across from St. Anthony's. That entire area is zoned R 4.5. I spoke with Jim Hendryx of Community Development and advised him that the church may have some interest in obtaining that property.Jim reminded me that there is a prior approval for a parking facility which has an outstanding permit. Should you wish to pursue acquiring Mr. Moore's property, you should speak with the Community Development Department first to determine if your planned use is allowed in that zone. I apologize for the delay in providing this information to you. I hope it is of help. Sincerel � William A. Monahan City Manager t�jim Hendryx 1:1ADAM1&LLLLETTERSCO0IC-ZONING ST.ANTFIONVS.DOC 13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 . _ .. . . .. - . .. . _ . . . . .:� � I.i,IY i: / May 1, 2001 C11Y OF TIGARD OREGON John Cook 12314 SW Millview Court Tigard, OR 97223 Re: St. Anthony's Parking Lot Dear John: Jim Hendryx asked me to provide you with the status of the St. Anthony's parking lot approval (CUP 97-00007) at the corner of Johnson and Walnut Streets. The project was granted a one-year extension on December 29, 2000 to December 29, 2001. Plans for construction are now in for review by the Engineering Department. I understand the church may be considering purchase of the Robert Moore property. Please be advised that any use other than the present single-family use will require approval according to the development code depending on what use is contemplated for that property. When the church determines the type of development it intends, please schedule a pre-application conference. The results of a pre-application conference are good for six months. Sincerely, �� f � Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager I:lcurpin\dickllettersUohn Cook Ltr re St.Anthony's.doc c: Jim Hendryx Bill Monahan CUP 97-00007 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 � • . °� ,> ��: ,� T` �� MEMORANDUM ;' �EPAR�� '' ; , TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT ' �'�'�� ' � o DATE: �a2a-o� TO: Steve Kay cc: Sherman Casper, City of Tigard FROM: Jim Wolf SUBJECT: Lighting plan for proposed parking area for St.Anthony Parish The lighting plan, as submitted, is acceptable. � . ; , r � �. ) ) � � / > � (. � �~•' � �'y .. r�!M C��' � �4 � � .. ::`: S�a :., . � r r� f� r t�� 1,`'.0 .; h .S� ;��"s_ ': � 4 .�t' t'.�:: .�41:: ;t�ei- : j�^ :)� '� ' �i :t�j!^";�3:� ; �� "�i�.i'� t'�f '"�¢ :"!' �,-; 4 . - �"�: ��' :i:'� �:� _ , �` R>,4 r:., .>....5.. .:J::'...... r>..,,..., ..,,....:>2:.r,:i.». . .,.,. ,. ... Date: 10/24/Ol From: Steve Kay Ceccacci Associates To: Jim Wolf City of Tigard Police Deparhnent 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 Subject: Security Lighting for St.Anthony Parish Parking Lot, Southwest Cornet of SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson Street Jim, We have been asked to get approval from the Police Department for our parking lot lighting plan. The attached plan shows where PGE is planning to install a 30 foot pole with two 250 watt HPS Flat Lens Streetlights in the middle of the proposed lot. As demonstrated by the attached plau, a minimum of 0.5 foot-candles will illuminate the parking lot and less than 0.25 foot-candles will fa11 on to the adjacent residenrial property. Once you have reviewed the plan, please fax your response to ow office(503-223-6201)and to the City of Tigard(attn: Sherman Casper, 503-598-1960). If you have any questions regarding this plan,feel&ee to ca11 me at 503-241-3792. Thank you, Steve Kay Ceccacci Associates CECCACCI ASSOCIATES 0215 SW Gibbs St. Portland,OR 97201 Ph. 503-241-3792 Fa�c 503-223-6201 /� OF P; �NG LOT. . ._. . �� „�. �j(Ir�l�\'� �j � \ y� � � ' .. � \' �� '' --� ��EETS C.o�D�-c�G� � a� � . \ .�T \ l =20 . . , �?,�, �� t'� ^ /� , . 1 UrSl,��i(l� �� J�,M ��`T ! V�K;C� �� l / ., .. � .\\ �. � , � � �L�' \ , ,,. Z� EXISTING y �\• O S'� \'� = Z v � �\ Q� RESIDENCE ;�` � ' � ° \� cFS `50�, � \ , � �o � � � � �� o � oo, .S \ o° ° �� o' � ° s /� �' F `\ �� /�S>o�:. �\ q�, � �'7 � �� / � / �� ,1 C "<> �;. �\\ � `\ C��`' �j`L � :i' v c % i -1��;;<\ �\ \ � , QP O' ,'� l O� ".; \ , � `'� �j C� � ' � � F 7� '� � \ � � . � � ° ` ry� � � T�. \�� C� � � /� ' �� .. � � /' "� G; \�� -' ;� � , ;` . PROPOSED 6' HT. � ' �> �� % � ,;� ' ' '��'•�;, S.OQ'` DITIONA WOOD FENCE �� ,, �' � �AC PAVIN `� ��''` � • R.O.W. D ICATI � �� C� � / �>.' :� • . BY OWNER O� �, �� \ , � \� � C, � �,. �\ � EXISTING FENCE ,� � , c, �� j� � , o � � C p � TO BE REMOVED -� ' ��' � c, / �� CON RETE � .� .� �� CU ��• z . i� �' �� ' � � i' �� .�,s�� . �� `� � � v �� ' �i� � •p �� 10.00' ADDITI r , � 9� � � � %i ;; C� '� ; R.0 . DEDIC ,� �� -, , ��._?�•c.,��A✓ �� TYP. � s � , �L 0" � ,�' ,�'� � �,4� � �� c, �� `b• �� ,:� �� 2)250 W�-tT !�S �-' • / � \ -q,�,� O �L.�"r LEN� , � � ��- � l ,� �a WHEE , '�� STK��'tLti . , .\ o �. , , � �, 5.5 R. ��A:�;> � ��,�� S TO P , � � �<..�� Sr YP. '� � ^� , `a . O :.. , O � 96 �'�,.�. � ', �� % � � ` �^�::� � � �� i �� ,:>a�' � ` �\ � ��;.' a �� i � � � � / ; � �� i ` % ;� 5 SIDEWALK �^ � ,�a � � % � , , �7 � , TYP. 4 fl �' OA� ':,��;��' i c •� � �y,�, , �,�' � � � ' c -.� ' o �F ��> > 6S �� : ��j � �O � ,� S ' . , O' ��:� � � a . , � �j \\/ � � 1 � ;�„� \� �� ' .� ��.' 6 �3 �� ./ �Q / �j . ,i ALIGN SE �JRITY � � �O �O� � POSTS 3' FROIvi _/� SA� '"�. . . a i LOT E E z� '� , cFs o .�,. 4 , 5.50' �_ � 8 ,c�. 2�85' � �.o / o , � O� /� 5.50' �� . � .c�� . � � � • x . • r . • � • • �� • �� • � October 24, 2001 Sherman Casper Permits Coordinator Ciry of Tigard 13125 Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Conditions of Approval Associated with Case#CUP97-00007 (St. Anthony Parish Parking Lot) Dear Mr. Casper, The following narrarive is provided in response to the faaced list of Conditions on October 23, 2001. As I mentioned on the phone, the original approval for the parking lot involved two lots: Ta�c Lot 1600 at the southwest corner of SW Johnson and Grant Streets, and the fonner Sunset Oil site(Ta�c Lot 1700)immediate to the south of the parking lot's location. However, since this inirial approval, St. Anthony Parish was unable to purchase of the former Sunset Oil site and a new plan was submitted and approved for Ta�c Loi 1600. Due to the contaminated soil on the adjacent Sunset Oil site as well as the monitoring of wells by DEQ on both Ta�c Lot 1600 and 1700,the applicant was forced to delay the parking lot construcrion for several years. We have been informed by City Staff that because of the long period of donnancy on this casefile and the high turn over of staff within the Planning Department, the City neglected to update the applicant on the current status of the project during the multiple permit reviews that have dragged out since February of 2001. Because of this exceptionally long process and that impending winter weather, we ask for your help to expedite this issuance of permits for the project. Attached is a copy of the initial plan for the parking lot with the two t�lots for your reference (see Exhibit 1). Also attached are half-size copies of the plans that were approved for the Site, Plumbing and '/2 Street Improvement Permits. Please check with Planning and Engineering for full-size copies of the approved plans. The applicant's response to each of the unaccounted for Condirions that must be met before Site or Building permits are listed below: 14. Utilities(Existing) UnderkrouncUPay Comment: As required, the applicant plans to submit a fee of$3,850.00 in lieu of placing the exisring overhead utility lines along SW Johnson Street underground. We expect the check to be delivered in the next couple days. Please verify the paytnent of this fee with front desk. Ceccacci Assoc�ates Environmental Planning Urban Design Landscape Architecture 0275 S.W.Gibbs Street Portland,Oregon 97201 503-241-3792 Fax 223-6201 1 S. Handicap Accessible Parking/Route Commenh As demonstrated by the attached Pazking Lot Inventory exhibit(Exhibit 2), a total of 178 standard and 7 handicap accessible spaces (including one that is van accessible)currently exist within Lot A-D at St. Anthony Parish. The exhibit also shows that tl�e applicant is providing an additional 49 compact spaces in the new Lot E. As required by Secrion 18.765.030(G)of the City of Tigard Community Development Code, the required number of disabled-accessible parking spaces is equal to that specified by the Oregon Uniform Building Code(LTBC). According to the UBC, when 200-300 parking spaces are provided, a total of 7 handicap spaces must be provided, including one that is van accessible. Therefore, the applicant meets the disabled-accessible standards of the City of Tigazd with the existing number of handicap spaces adjacent to the facilities of St. Anthony Parish. 16. Calculation of I.andscaped/Impervious SurjaceArea Ratio Comment: As demonstrated by the attached Landscape Plan(Exhibit 3)the ratio of Landscaped Area(6,234 sq. ft.)to Impervious Area(14,091 sq. ft.)is 1:2.26. 17. Proojof Lot Consolidation Action Comment: As menrioned previously,the original approval for the pazking lot involved two lots: Tax Lot 1600 at the southwest corner of SW Johnson and Grant Streets, and the former Sunset Oil site(Ta�c Lot 1700)immediate to the south of the parking lot's location. However, since this initial approval, St. Anthony Parish was unable to purchase of the former Sunset Oil site and a new plan was submitted and approved for Taac Lot 1600. Therefore, the condition for lot consolidarion of the two tax lots no longer applies to this application. 18. DEQ Contamtnated Soils Inspection Comment: As menrioned above,the parking lot development will not include Tax Lot 1700,the former Sunset Oil site. For your reference, a letter from DEQ has been attached as E�ibit 4 stating that the adjacent tax lot has been cleaned of contaminated soils and the monitoring wells installed on both properties show acceptable groundwater conditions. � � 19. Landscape Plan {Revised) Comment: As demonstrated by the attached plans, a ten-foot landscape buffer has been provided along the west and south edges of the parking lot, as well as along both the Johnson and Grant Street frontages(see Exhibits 5 and 6). As also shown on the attached plans, an existing 6-foot high fence, a row of trees and 40 five-gallon shrubs will be planted along the western landscape strip. The 40 five-gallon shrubs provided exceed the required density of shrubs along this property boundary considering Tax Lot 1700 is no longer part of this development. The attached landscape plan(Exhibit 6)should provide a clear indicarion to City Staf�that the applicant meets or exceeds the landscape buffering and screening effect of the preliminary plan. The attached E�chibit 7 is the detail of the security post and chain that was submitted for the approved set of permitted drawings. As required, St. Anthony Parish will chain and lock the entrance to the parlcing lot during hours when the church's faciliries are not in use. 20. Easement Existenc�Limitati�ns Comment: As menrioned above,the parking lot development will not include Tax Lot 1700,the former Sunset Oil site. There are no easements on the subject site, Tax Lot 160�. Therefore, the condirion to reflect the easement present on the Sunset Oil site within the applicant's site plan no longer is applicable. 21. Security Lighting Plan Required Comment: PGE is planning to install a 30 foot pole with two 250 watt HPS Flat Lens Streetlights in the middle of the proposed lot. A lighting plan showing illumination levels is attached as Exhibit 8. As demonstrated by the attached exhibit, a minimum of 0.5 foot-candles will illuminate the parking lot and less than 0.25 foot- candles will fall on to the adjacent residential property. 22. Ar6orist Report Reyuired Comment: As shown by the attached Survey,the two evergreen trees(which are Ponderosa Pines,not Sequoias}aze on the adjacent Taac Lot 1700, which is no longer part of this application(see Exhibit 9). T�Lot 1600 is currendy vacant and contains no trees(the one deciduous tree located on the survey died and fell over several years ago and was subsequently removed). Therefore,this Condition is no longer applicable. If there is any addirional support material required for the review of these Conditions of Approval, feel free to give me a call at 241-3792. Thank you for your considerarion in this matter. S� cerely, n / ( " Steve Ka � Ceccacci Associates � �x1-f-�St-r I � . . oc is• c.cNC srow� seweia ,� „R y„ ,�,.r � ��I ADDITIOYA�L��II OCATIOH O� ON-SIT WAT R � � �� Z QJALIT7 TREATT'1ENT DI�D�M �% �� ►"rATER LINC �XiBTING RGW _ — - - � f f O PRCXGSE ROVI - �'� CD 4T LOW ►OINT iN �� 0' � r4RKING LOT � � �� SW JO{-1NSaN Q — — — — — — STRE�T— I11 V rRDP DRAIN LIN� ay � �� OPE I L � < < < � . _ � ` z � ` � � � . � � � � l � ��.�� z c � i � � � �� ,N R�,�� a � .�� _r.�x i.or ,�oo c r. . .� � w �� c � ] �'" SfCURITI' I c ' �� ' c �+ UJ II EXISTiNG �v.r ��a�as � Ll , . C 1 . C Q IJ� � < << a � � - - � � . - -` 2 � � � o� � � I 1— < < �� _ � � � II� u. T� �� ,� i � 1_:,t� ;�� ► � I � �� _ I � ' ; � �� H i < < < � � < < � � � , 1� , c� —t _ _ _ _ i !I� 1 11 i � SITE P1AI� CASE NC�. St Anthony's ��8��. ��p Overflow Parking Lot CUP 97-0007 � • � i � �x�1�8�i 2 � � � • LEGEND ` �J ... m s ��w � a � U m S�'^�°ne / o_ am�. _......._ t � U � 0°'�oa� �J E}IISTING CONTOUR I . � 9 Ym�°" d C i�a'C3n�a'� �� Y7 OG4■ f i � �x—� E}�STING FENCE � I I � �,, HANDICAPPED PARHING SPACE — — � � — — s — — _ — - — _ — — — — — — W G — — — — — — — v COMPACT PARHING SPACE BW JONNSON STRE£T o+ LIGIiT POLE ——�— PROPERTY LINE � — — — — — — — — — — — — — PROPOSED PARKING LaT � —�� CF'.��'TER LINE WITN 4q GOI`1PAGT SPAGES ' ' ��T�� 0 DI PROPOSED DRAIN INLET � I II j DC�BTING PLAY fIELDB ��STIIyG I . ❑ DI EXISTING DRAIN INLET ' � °c-,�'s�, �� ., Lrsr E � '�� ti�t �'.. � MI-I EXISTING MANHOLE � f � `�oy •. � ; R EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT �--- — � � � _ — — — — DRAIN LINE f� ' � . u PROPOSED CURB ` EXISTINGPARF:INGLOT W1TH Q �' Z 69 STANDARC SPACES AND 3 I�T 'C' 4 HANDICnP SPACES m O EXISTING PARKING LOT WITH (iNCLUDING ONE'JAN-ACCESSIBLE) � _ _ � SO STANDARD SPACES 4�a /^ �/� 1'IF�- IS C(,��iTi�h� � � v , V I c � _�,y�. ` ' � �ty,�� ar n' �/ Z '�° I.S �Rt�Di�C� F �'c,� ��c �c;�,.^Fm.��:� � i'P- � �: �`} Q Q ��;5'Jt;C.n} �C1 �'(a(L,� l.�Gm�L'��aS ��l�t'.u..1 � + — — — — �� — � � (3 � I x �-�� , � W �T�, i i Z r ,� � ,A.r ,�., �� ' w w � � O � � C� �� a � � .� D(15TING PARKING LOT WITid }� M°� � Z Z�p � � — �b STANDARD :iPAGES AND �i Z 3 � 3 HANDIGAP SPACES _ — — — � aQ � T--�-l�— � � SW McKENZ1E� STRE�T . � � ; 49W — v A — — �� i O � n { � ��,RK I N� LOT I NV�NTORY � � � '�'� � EXISTING PARKING LOT WITH � � � � � �e� 33STANDARDSPACES � LOT STANDAiZD GOMPAGT +�G � _ �� s �,�� ' f - - � A 26 0 3 ��A��, A �,,� - - B 33 0 0 SITE �� , C 50 � � PLAN ^ D 6q D 4 �� \\ 81'y GAARD! gyV P7eDq,L�LD ^ a e� L 0 ��G 0 �W TOTAL 178 �q 7 234 P - 1 �� , . �.�t-i��-� 3 I`�=40-c�^ , L&��'�C'��:,:�r F±'�,l:p�.�� ' � a ; _ • ni �J�i / �.r,��, � — � • e G-�l L j . � \ � i . \ \ \ , \ \ /, /i I .� \ ,\ ,\ / / ,� '\ \ \ // / I ��'� \ � � / � �'� `\ ,,� 25 SHIROBANA SPIRAEA /� / �I j� �'� •\ ��. \ 2 GAL. O 4� a.c. j' j' � � 18 VARIEGATED REDPMG DOCW00� / �, � \ ,\ 5 GAL. �; �• �/ CRUSHED ROCK ``\ � `�� / • �, %" BY OTHERS _ '��S -\ �• �, �� 1 SHORE PINE . \�fY ,� �, / � /: 7'-8' HT. � �\�� '•� 'CORAL BEAUTY CaTONEASTER �, / �, • `.._ �'-.": ,.� �`� 1 GAL. DOUBLE ROW O 3' O.C. � ��, �, EX15T1NG �-��_� \ 1RIANGUUR SPACING. TYP. ,� RE9DENCE ' `� � / �� % _ � ' �\ ''� j• _. �"' % �' 21 PARNEY COTONEASTER �,' '�� ``\ ` � '\ /', j j. %� 5 GAL O 5' O.C. `\ '-� /, � PROPOSE� 6� HT. - ` .�,. ' `\ `v , WOOD FENCE 8 AKEBaNO CHERRY �� BY OWNER 2' CAL. •� ��-: \-\ ANDANS ALL DEDEPTHFOF�L �' i t t/2" DIA. WASHED RtVER ROCK � i DEODAR CEOAR 30 BER6ERIS T. 'A7ROPURPURPUREA� ` 7-8' HT. – 2 GAL O 3' O.C. `,� �, SINGLE LEADER � � j 18 VARIEGATE� REDTWIG DOGW'000 't �� 3 ARBUlUS UNE00 5 GAL. � ,' � /� �\ \ 5 GAL. [; = : ` \ � 1 COAST RE�WOOD ` :;,_;� j _\ '•., � SINGLEHLEADER y 52,�+'� `� 'C�7RAL BEAUTY COTONEA TER \ 1 GAL SINCLE ROW O 3' O.C. �4,Q'�/ `\ ,\ �� \ 14 BERBERIS T. 'AIROPUR RPUREA' � ` \ �� 2 GAL. O 3' O.C. ��O / �' \ `\ .� `\8 VARIEGAIED REDTWIG DOGW000 6 ABELIA 'EDWARD GOUCHER' ��y �' '�� 5 GAL. � 5 GAL Q 4' O.C. �, ' ��j' %• '•�- \ •\ 17 SHIROBANA SPIRAEA '\ 2 GAl O 4' O.C. ��p• � • 9 �RED SUNSET REO MAPLE `� 29 PARNEY COTONEASTER � 2 1/2" CAL. �,,\ `\. 5 GAL � 5' O.C. �j� RU8U5 CALYCINOROES � ' �/ 4' POT 18' O.C. �. 6 WESTERN REO 'HOGAN' CEDAR '� �� 7-8 HT. � 15' O.C. / �,' '�� \ �Mp�Q�'�__ �A � � / / 20 TA%US 9ACCATA 'REPENDENS' �\ � Ti�v �1 5 GAL O 4' O.C. �\ � � . �t�- Q�� , �'f ' •Sp`'� �, �� .� � I �G��P�/ �� ,�x�� / % ��, % ST. ANTHONY PARISH �\ \ �� _ / CHURCH AND SCHOOL � �i��'il �� / �, % �'.� / / /•" �,� . / •�� . / i�//! \ � �� . . ..- --- :�..- ...:,.�1 5U,�� _��. �� ri 1�-�EQ �'CSAS (v��.lo,� N.11 m00: �C,h�t�i�� +��on Departenerit of Envizonuiental Qual3ty � 1 11 Northwest Regior� �on�w.�.a�Ma_co�.�r 2020 SW FaurthAvenue Sulte a00 ^ f Portlind,OR 97201-1987 (5a3)2245269 Votce July 1, 1999 1'n(5as)22�,,� Jetry Micsen � Sunsct Fuel Company . 2944 S.E. Powell Boulevarcl PO Bax 42287 Poztla.nd, OR 97242-0287 Rc: No P�nher Action Determinadon for Sunset Fuel- Grant Avevue ECSi#2006 Dear Mr_ Miesen: The D�pattment ef Envimnrnentsl Qualiry(DE�has compl�ted its review of rhe infonnation provided for the Sunset Fuel property located at 1�1�•SW Granc Soreet,Tigaid,Oregon. The DEQ has determined that invcstioation and cleanup of the faciliry is complEte and rhat no futtt�r actiort is rcquired under Oregon Revis�d Statutes(ORS)465.20�et, seq. DEQ's determination thac invtscigation and cteanup is coraplcte is based on our unders�ding of the site including. 1. In January 1497, Sunsec Fuel Company decommissioued cwo 12,000 gallon. ahav�gTOUnd fuel tanks (ASTs). The subsequenc environmental assessmencs idendfiecl heating oil-containinated soil and groundwater. 2. Bctwern August 1997 u�d July 1498. 5u�et Fuel excawated appreximately 625 cubic yards of heauag oil-contaa�inaud soil tbat was subsequenrly disposed at Aillsburo Landfill. A limit�d arnount of contaminated soil remaias ac depth (approximately 48 fcet belaw grouad surf�ce), The con[aminaced soil extends from�he souihcrn boundary of rhe former extavation to the south, towards Sw Grant Street. Concammanc concencrazions are highest near che sou�hern excavarion boundary and raage from approximately none detected to 2,0�0 mg/kg as heatiag oil in soil. ff the pevofeum contaminatcd soil is disturbed or excavated ae some future time,it shoutd bc manaoed in accordance wich a11 applicahle rules and regulations. Polynuclear axomatir hydrocarbons (PAHs), matals, polychlorinaced biphenols (PCBs) and volatile orgaaic compounds (VOCs) were ao[detected iri a sample heavi]y contaminattd vrith pc�oleum. �• In Septrmber 1998 and March 1999, Sunset Fue1 samplcd the grouadwater via shullow gmundwater monitori�g wells installed in luly 1998. Pecroleum hydrocazbons as diesel wece dece�ted in dowctgxadieat monitoring wrlls at concentrations becweea 0.29 mg/1 and 0.94 mg/l. Neither VOCs nor PAHs wcre de�ec[ed in groundwater. Groundwa[er alcwacioas Auccuatcd bccw�en 1 co 8 fext below ground surface. � �`1 F r-�� C1-.,�1 ,�,a,, � 1�� fl�., �eJ. ��„y - �uc.,. . .� �-,rv� .,r�_iwi�_��_L�L �fr 1�_t 11V.lt�.i Y'.lc o^ v��_ ,.._.�� ,.3:�:. '.,... 1 50,. .. ,,.,.,,. ..f0 �'CS.�s �ooi ■ -. 4, A Public Notice regarding che praposai [o issue a "no furrhor acdon" leaer was publish�d on lune 1, 1999 with the public cnmmtn� peried ending June 30, 1999. No comrrunt5 vfere reeeived. DEQ has de[ermiaed that no turther aetion is nr.cessary because nazardous peu�oleum conscituencs do noc remain in sail or gtoundwater at actionable Ievels. CanCentrauons in �ow�dwater are expected to decre�e because the majoriry of che coatamin�ted soil has beett removed 7he DEQ's determinauon will not be applicable if new ot undisclosed facts show that the investigation arld clea�tup dnes not comply with the referenced ru]es. We rc�ommend that a copy of all informa�ian be maintained with th�p�rmanent fACiliry records. DEQ files and the Envimnmental Cleanup and Site�nformat�on (ECSn database will be updaced to reflect the No Further Action deteraiinatioa. if you have quesiions,plesse fe�l ft+�e to eontact me at(503 229-5445. 'Thaak you Por your participation and cooperation in DEQ's Voluntary Cl�anup Progratn. Sincerety, G%��L"�"`�y. C.�-I►1''�'a'*'v�.— Sheila A. Monroc aa.q— 5�33 Northwcst Region Acting Managrr Voluncaty Cleanup and Site Assessmcnt Section cc: Ginny Barrecc: Sunset Fuet Arian Chcaowcth: Ryccwicz &Cheaoweth Dan Hafley: vCSAS:DEQ Yi . • =�c�-4!g1' = ,, � � _ ��—��1 I � '�� >�-� \ � ,• i� �'� `\ ��` i' .,\ -.� i` �� \ �. i' �SET NEW ELEC. METER O � `\ ,\'�� ' � EXIST. STREET UGHT POLE ,� `�\ / � EXTEND 1' CONDUIT TO �y 6 �� PARK NG LOTNTER ry�o' ``\ 3\.\✓O��s `\,.\ . �'� �' • \ ,\O�� `\ �' / �' `� � �O `\ ��''' `�\ �' / / P RESIDENCE : .,.� ,. ��.�\` �°,qC�s e�` `�\, \ /, / / � ,0 0 8 \ `\ /. / ��'o � � c�� Ssj\ ��` S� F.��y � � .\ � / /� P`� o�,� �� \� G � ° � / `�9�Q1 � � � �.�• /, /,�; /, `�� .�j�h� ��\��V ryh.`�, c �'�/ / ��4�3\ \ /' � �j� �\ 4 �' i C % / B� ```� \ / PROPOSED 6' HT. � � �. � �p ,� 5.00" DrnaNnL � WOOD FENCE d � 1 AC PA�1NG -� c R.O.W.�CAT10N / 1 BY OWNER / �' ` �.�` ti \ �, � �� V , �� o � � EXISTING FENCE �'' o �� ! � � � � TO BE REMOVED � \ 8 \ � CONCRETE ` � � �, � �4 p0• V� CURg _ �• i / �\ '•� \ � G � � \ 4 � q � � i •\ � �l% � \V POLE LIGHT� .� -� � 10.00�� AOOITIONAL � �iq d' �.,�' �\ Z, R `9' R.O,W. OEUICATION � ry1' � �G � ;� v p TYP, / ^� �� ti� �� `. G � li ti$), WHEEL � c, 0-�. 5.5' R. �G \\ r�:- , /� ,, \ 3 ,�h• STOPS, \ ti 4 , tij Q; � � � -` �3�8A8;, � TrP. �\ \ "xp ; j" 'g6• ly ' G� 4j,"� ' �. � ��'�� p � n��?� �l� � REPER TO CIVIL �. `�; � / �;>' �y DRAWINGS FOR ALL �\ �i . � �, WORK IN R.O.W. i c / �- Q' / �\ i �S �l� �� '-\ � / �� 5' SIDEWALK ��p. �04. � � � � rw.� ��q�` / '�.r/ � '\ �/ ��/,. ??�S, �ss �� ° � o•o � , ° �s��. �� - ��/ � \ .�� ucri sE Rm � 0�. PDSTS�FROM �� LOT E � � 5.50' \ •� � �, �'�es, 1p� � � �� 5.50' . 9 '9 h. /� ` � 26� �8 � � �, � � ?�� /� 5T. ANTHONY PARISH � ' ,' ,y� j CHURCH AND SCHOOL �, \ / �� j % `� j / %�' � .� �. %- '� / �; . '� � ' � T�'`; ' 1�1"'' � I� ! � �� :G�d - ..\ \ � \ .,\ \ / � / .� \ \ ,\ ,\ /, /, \ \ \ / / ,� \ .\ \ /,, � ��\ `\ ` � 25 SHIROBANA SPIRAEA �� / �. \ 2 GAL. � 4' O.C. /, /�• / \ \ \ / �`� iB VARIEGATED REDTIMG DOGWO00 �' � \ 5 GAL. �' / � ` \ �� ` � � / / CRUSHED ROCK %� BY OTHERS ,..c I�� `� �� ; <=1�:°. � 1 SHORE PINE . \��S � � / � /,' 7'-8' HT. '� . �\�1P�� '-� 'CORAL BEAUTY COTONEASTER ,� � � ' � / � � '� t GAL. DOU9LE ROW � 3' O.C. �� , EXISTING _,,,,_ � .'� `\ .� iRIANGULAR SPACING, TP. ,� RESIDENCE � ��;\ � / �� , �— � \ ` � /•� /% j� _ � \ 21 PARNEY COTONEASTER �, '•� %' j %' %� 5 GAL O 5' O.C. �.. ��'.��'�� _ `\ `�\ j' � PROPOSED 6' HT. �-`�,'� `\ `\�, WOOD FENCE 8 AKEBONO CHERRY �' BY aNMER 2' CAL. ,'�t�'t, \.\ ANDANS ALL 3D"E�EPTHFOFOIL 1 DEODAR CEDAR �' i 1 1/2" DIA. WASHED RIVER ROCK � 30 BERBERIS T. 'ATROPURPURPUREA' 7'-8' HT. - 2 GAL O 3' O.C. ` / `,\ � SINGLE LEADER \�l� 3 ARBUTUS UNE00 16 VARIEGAiED REDTWIG DOGVlOOD . \ � / \ 5 GAL. 5 GAL. �-; ,'y�-�-._ . �� ' , � . �\ � 1 COAST REOWOOD ': \ / \ �� 7'-8' HT. - - j� _ �3�4, \ � �CORAL BEAUTY' COTONEA TER �NGLE LEADER S�G �P `\ \` '\ 1 GAL. SINGLE R(?W �3' O.C. h��,Q'/ `\ �� G ' � � 14 BERBERIS T. 'ATROPUR RPUREA' �. �2 GAL. � 3' O.C. �.� \ 3�0 � / j' \ �\ .\ \8 VARIEGATEO REDPMG DOGWO00 6 AEIELIA 'EDWARD GOUCHER' �'w �' '�� 5 GAL. 5 GAL. � 4� O.C. ,w� �� \ 17 SHIROBANA SPIRAEA � � /, / � �\ 2 GAL O 4' O.C. A�p �� ' 9 'RED SUNSET' RED MAPLE � .`\ `\ 29 PARNEY COTONEASTER � � 2 1/2' CAL. ,,\ 5 GAL O 5' O.C. � G�� RUBUS CALYCINORDES � � 4� POT 18° O.C. � 6 WESTERN RED 'HOGAN' CEDAR �'� �\ 7-8 HT. O 15' O.C. / �' '�� / 20 TAXUS BACCATA 'REPENDENS' �\ �\ 5�� ,/ ,' 5 GAL �4' O.C. \ '\ \ �� P�P/ �' '�'�I E�.TS C��.�o�� I� �` -� ��' ;' �� ` j S'C. ANTHONY PARISH �\ �� / j' CHURCH AND SCHOOL .� \ \� \ /' / j, \ \ / / /, % \ /� � ,\ \ / /,�� / \ //� '� � � i" �'� >�� / �' " ��` . /�� ," j. I . � � A < STD. GALV. POST GAP tt 1/2" DIA. GALV. EYE SGREW AND BOLT. C#-IAIN TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER � 2' DIA. GALV. STE�L P05T m FINISH ALL VI519LE GONC. IN LIGI-IT BROOM FINISN FIN15N GRADE I F � . I h • I �' � FORM TOP 4" dl � • I I . OF GONC. FTG. . 1° I �.. � I I 1 � � � - I I • � .la 1 � � � � L_J 12�' � 2 Lot Securit Post and Chain � � �-4 Scale: 1n-1�_�� . � � � � � � . � , _ __ . __ . (� V� � � OF F. �<ING LOT \ �� X�l�� /�� '`�N , \ �\QJ�r �t 1...� L-ci / . � � \ . � � T �� ' � �' / � , �. , � �o � ��' � . r "' � � �� EXISTING ;: /` ,, , •Zy ,.. �\` SA C ,S .,\ � "'~ ,., � '9 8\ Q- RESIDENCE > � FS '00, � \ , � �� , � � � �\ 0 00 �.,..,, Oo, ,; :.� �So, , o �, - F \ �� .�:� � �S�., �� ,,, o' �\ h, , � �� ,,� ,<; ,� c ,.3 �' � �\ ' `�� P n��, p� �% v o c �% ; ��;, �� Q �o�� , ' G � o c % F jQ��` \ � �1, '� °�j ' �,°` � I � � ^�� e � � � - � `�� '� `\ ,� � ; � , PROPOSED 6' HT. � ' � ;� � ,; � ^1'`�;. 5.OQ'` DITIONA � , G �,, l • WOOD FENCE �' �'� / AC PAVIN j' c '/ / �� ` R.O.W. D 1CATI �' '� � BY OWNER ;% � , , • �, � `\ G \� � \ c % :. -a � � �� , o � EXISTING FENCE v � ' \, � �`� �- � %� C p � TO BE REMOVED c, � CON RETE �p� > �;: v� . . �� r �� V C U �1 , ,� � L-4 / \\� G \ \ � / � � � �v �/ �' � POL -� � ' �� 10.00' ADDITi �, ..�\ � r .J�� • � , � 9' �h / r �� \ 2' R. R.0 . DEDIC � �\ � � , ,� � G s �� ' �fi �� TYP. , ; � . � �� : �� ' . � � �� i 2�250 W�� F� „'v , , � �'� ;'�C' _ �l-�,,,r �,� �� :�� . . �, ` , oa WH EE �� ,^7� o� S'��-1 �� '� , ��, ��, h� STOP / , �� 5.5' R. ��v. , , � � O; �Q St�,,. � c YP. '� ,� „ ° • , 96, �,, ,; \\ ; � � �^?: , \`�� // ��:::%. . °• � i � ,\ % � - ' / � �'� : a �,�� , \ ; ,/ / �, , , , . � , , s . � , � � ` \: � , / 5 SID4 WALK a , a �,'� ,, 7 4 �� , TYP. �Gffl Og' C , �y4' , v`Z',� �� ; .. , �P , �2 �6 S � ;' �� '� p� � / �S, o, ; � . �o� � , ° , / �6 . •� �� S�' _ \` •i' G,QP/ �j ai ALIGN SE �JRIT" � � �O �O� - � POSTS 3' FROh9 SA� , '� , • d i LOT E E� , �FS o : � 5.50' 6 • / g �� 5.50' , � �,� 2 �s, / o /'., O , �„ . �• , wo�� 7�, . . . . . ._' � � ' � �� , �S`<'.��- b� �- \ / CON5T. � , . . • • ' ' � . .�, . S�. e CB— �E � �.� : . � � b. . '4�9�'�o+yF� t `'�� d'� 2 � � / , � . . � . .`�8, �r�� ,`� f o es.2 �6 ' . . �. . �. " �. :. .:.� . . � � .�.� �. . ::�°� -��\`b�. . �" �� b� ti. r � /�� _. � � � .. ��. . . � � ... � .. � .. �, . ''�;��,`, ,� � o�ea. O �' \�' .' '' . ' � :� ,� , ' � � , " ; � � � ;L: : �� p��' , e O� � � . - : . .. . � . . . • ` • r• n /� {�[�I M��\� <v 4 � . . ' , ' • . ' • ' .. .. ..��1J�1�l'\�I V 1`�� '. ;.��\�\ •. 6 �b 1�� N S `r „Y . � . . . � .�� :� .. � .. . �0•• • �.. • . . �• ' • � . . . • 5.: �64.0 _ : . = o �e // : . : • . . . �.� •. . .. ., .. • . . . • . . �� '. N �/ �. . � .-�.. - .� .�`0.�� 4.9�5�,. � �. � � . . � . , � � �. . . �. . �� *� � oys � \ . .. . . � A'G�.. .47. . . � � . : . � .. � . .j: r �'�,�: ° f � . . . p: . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . � �� . .i f ��, '�9�� . . . .. . . �::g63�)�:��.�. �� : � . . � � � � � � � °... ?�.. � . . . �� . . . .. . . l PP-8 ., . . :... .TrA.j< �0.�.. 1:6.0:0;��.�:.: �: ��. ;. . , :.. .� � � � �� e - ce- � . . . . -�'.� � . ��. D�.DI�A�Tl0�1��.� : ;� :.:. /.�'� �� / : � . : . � : . � : .. , . :. . . � . - .. , �.�o:oo. ��. .! �BJ� �. � j .. � ...: . �. . .. .� .. �. � . . � � � � �� ' ;s•oE� �� ; �! r i�� °� " � � . . . . . � 1 � . `..• . • . . . . : . . . /. • f e�° // � ' � . . ... �• �' �' . • • . . . � ' .e �../.. s� �v0 : _ . � � � � � . � � .. . . � .��.�� ._�. . sa�... '�ds o'r / . . . :. . . .r j / % . . . . - .. . - . . �% � / �/ % . ' . . �. � •• , �.: N . • . ` � �:.,�39'53�OQ.E� :.. .:��.:�� e. �. % � � ee� ' f / �� 1��1..3�3 . �.�.. �s' :s�!�� N� 730 ' . �/ .. � ?'ee J : / 5��96• y : •. .. . � . �:�'. /• ' J ' 4' CHAIN LINK 848ti� " ' ..� � .•� �� / . /: �. / . .. FENCE . I '� ' o� / �L `` y : . _ �e ee ; ! �b � . . �'/, .��.� � e� . / �tS ♦ ' n :• /. ' � . �� / . m �: . %�� l / :. o % � .� ::e�* e� •.�. ' .� , / / �•s't � / '..� � / � �66 36"E�R / � � p'T C � � . \, / '°� S39'53'00"W'-� ' 2 87.45' , � . vE� , , g"CONC � e4� � �i S DEC WALL � � / •. � % 16� ,, ' 1 .,� / � o°� 38"EVER � �� ' Be,e � � � e� � ��s r ) �e e�/ f '/'e4 . ' , g f ARE NOT \ j �. EASEMENTS \ �bq. :� �lc, ' TO DO S0, A TITLE RE q. Qa�� _r:' � f j/ - 2, ELEVATIONS ARE BAS � ; tiF ELEVAT�ON � � CB-8 . �,, ; Np. 208 � � BRASS DISK �N THE � f , � • SDMI�3 f pF THE INT E R SECTIOP ' STREET. � ea.e /�e� P�g, � ' 3. FEATURES SHOWN C % ^,�o• � pgSERVATIONS. vY�' , / , , / �Q, / j ; , � �c'��i_o►' ,�o ; � / �X�IS1T �' . � �, ; .. . � , COND[TION STATUS STATUS ORDER# CONDITION TITLE/WORDING\ STATUS* DATE BY � 9.00 STORM FAC(EXISTNG)IMPACT�iEPORT M 7/9/O1 BDR Prior to issuance of the site and/orbuilding permit,the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City,of the downs'tream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volum�,but in no event less than 1/4 mile. 10.00 STORM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CAPACI"i'Y M 7/9/O1 BDR If the capacity of any downstream public sto�m conveyance system or culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the develo ment,the developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility. 11.00 CONS ON-SITE RUNOFF DETNT'N FCLTY M 7/9/O1 BDR If the projected increase in surface water runoff hich will leave a proposed development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing bu'ldings or dwellings,the downstream stormwater system shall be enlarged to relieve the identified flooding cond ion prior to development of the developer must construct an on-site detention facility. 12.00 H20 QUAL FAC INSTALLED ON SITE M 7/9/O1 BDR The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality acility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No.96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for revie and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be sub itted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 13.00 EROSION CTRL PRVD W/P-IMP DRAWNGS M 7/9/O1 BDR An erosion control plan shall be provided as part f the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to"Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Pl s-Technical Guidance Handbook,February 1994." 14.00 UTILITIES(EXISTNG)UNDERGRND/PAY N BR The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Johnson Street underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,it shall be paid prior to issuance of the site permit. (NOTE: T'he amount of the fee will be$3,850.00). 15.00 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING/ROUTE � Handicapped accessible parking and accessible route across SW Grant Avenue shall be provided or an increase in handicapped accessible parking shall be provided within the existing parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Funk,Building Division. 16.00 CALC LNDSCP/IMPRVIOUS SRFCE RATIO �j The applicant shall provide a calculation of landscaping to impervious surface ratio for the proposed use. �C ,� STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. � 1�;� 17.00 PROOF OF LOT CONSOLIDATION ACTION � � The applicant shall either provide proof of lot consolidation action through Washington County or record a joint maintenance and access agreement. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. 18.00 DEQ CONTAMINATED SOILS INSPECTION �.��..k: �� rn�n.D The previous oil sales site is presently excavated and fenced,apparently in order to remove contaminated soils. � The applicant shall provide a copy of all necessary Department of Environmental Quality inspections and approval prior to issuance of pernuts to redevelop this property. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. 19.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN(REVISED) � �PtD�7�� l.1S T1U+`n�t` I 1 g �-a. `�p tJ0'i APp�`'� ► cZS �F�.�2 ��`�s� ��;led 0 ` �}' a v�;,� -�1�� `'� l-1?t� ��,�„ -�1,,e ��I �„uPa� 1 � � �' C�REF� L,Je.E`2 U^ a� �o<J P1ngCaseCond.rpt Page: 2 of 3 CONDITION STATUS STATUS ORDER# CONDITION TITLE/WORDING STATUS* DATE BY The applicant shall submit and receive approv of a revised landscape plan 6efore the City approves a building or development permit for the parking lot.(�the revised plan shall provide for landscaped setbacks along ,/� Joh�son Street and Grant Avenue at least as wide and at least as landscaped as shown on the preliminary plan; f� ► ��a minimum 10-foot wide landscaped buffer strip shal abut the west and south edges of the parking lot;(1) at the outside edge of that strip,the revised plan shall provide a minimum 6-foot high sight-obscuring fence or wall or a three-foot high berm planted with evergreen shrubs capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within two years of planting or other landscaping(larger at planting)capable of providing a continuous 6-foot high screen within rivo years. Fencing and vegetation shall be set back from Johnson Street and Grant Avenue as needed for sight distance. (2) the applicant may alter the nature,number, size and/or spacing of landscape materials shown on the preliminary plan to achieve a buffering and screening effect equal to or greater than that achieved by the preliminary plan with amendments recommended by City staff. If the applicant proposes landscaping substantially similar to that proposed in the preliminary plan,the revised plan shall provide for a row of trees within the west and south landscape strips,consistent with spacing standards in the CDC,and shall provide for at least 50 five-gallon shrubs within the western landscape strip. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division.(c) T'he applicant shall propose measures to prevent unauthorized access to the parking lot when it is not used for the church or its accessory uses and to facilitate enforcement when needed. 'The planning manager shall approve such measures if they provide reasonable protection against unauthorized use of the property at times or in a manner that would interfere with the peaceful occupancy of homes in the vicinity. The planning manager may order or allow changes to the measures over time based on experience with the lot. 20.00 EASEMENT EXISTENCE/LIMITATIONS Before the City approves a building or development pernut authorizing development of the portion of the site owned by Hanis Oil,the applicant shall amend the preliminary plan to reflect the existence and limitations �� r�' imposed by an easement over the west edge of that portion of the site or shall show that such an easement does ' not exist or does not restrict use of the property as proposed. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Planning Division. 21.00 SECURITY LIGHTING PLAN REQUIRED The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan to the Police Department and to the planning manager for n/Z review and approval. The plan shall show lighting levels on and off site. The planning manager shall approve �� the plan if light fixtures do not cast more than one foot-candle of light onto residential property. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf(Police Department)and Mark Roberts(Planning Division). 22.00 ARBORIST REPORT REQ'D An arborist report shall be provided that reviews the condirion of the tree that is proposed to be removed. The report shall also review any special construction techniques that will be needed to be used to incorporate the two existing trees into the site. If the arborist report finds that the tree to be removed is dead and the others can � � be incorporated into the site,then no tree mitigation would be required as set forth in the mitigation rario standard provided in Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d). If it is found to be necessary to remove additional tree(s) � then tree mitigation shall be provided as required of Section 18.150. Also, if the Sequoia trees cannot be preserved a minimum of two additional street trees shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 23.00 SITE FINAL INSP REQS P-IMP REQRMN BR Prior to final site inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements,obtain conditional acceptance from the City,and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 24.00 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS OF P-IMP PRVD'D BR Prior to a final site inspection,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1)mylars;and 2)a diskette of the as-builts in"DWG"format, if available;otherwise "DXF"will be acceptable. NOTE: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn,then a diskette is not required. 25.00 H20 QUAL FAC(PVT)CERTIFICATION HW Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building,the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott(639-4171,ext. 311). *Condition Status: M=Met N=Not Met PingCaseCond.rpt Page: 3 of 3