CUP1997-00005 cm oF noAac
Commumty�DrvsCopment
� ShapingA;Better Community
+ � cin oF�sa�n
• ` 'WasFeington County, Oregon
� NOTICE OF FiNAI ORDER c� BY TNE HEARINGS OFFiCER
, ..
Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �CUP) 97-0005
VARIANCE (VAR) 97-0003
Case Name(s): AT � T MONOPOLE TOWER
Name of Owner: David & Christine Hammond
Name of Applicant: AT & T Wreless Services
Address of Applicant: 1600 SW Fourth Avenue City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97201
Address of Property: 12562 SW Main Street City: Tigard State: Oreaon Zip: 97223
Tax Map 8� Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101.
Reonest:—> The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved a request to develop a 50-foot-tall cellular
communications monopole tower and related equipment structures. A Variance has also
been approved to the development standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area
to minimize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno Creek. The access
drive will be situated within that 25-foot-wide buffer area.
Une: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated, central
commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and
mixed uses. APPLIgABIF BEYIEW CBREBIIL• Community Development Code Chapters 18.32,
18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134.
Actl�q: —> ❑ Approval as requested � Approval with conditions ❑ Denial
Motice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to:
0 Owners of record within the required distance � Affected govemmental agencies
� The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s)
Rnal Decisi�n: �
TRE DECISI�N SNAl1 BE fINAL�M FBIOAY IOtY 25,1997 BNLESS AN APPEAE!S RlE�.
The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from
the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and
Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days
after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be
accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of
$500.00.
T11E DEA�IlME FaH F1111l6 OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PJL OM IOIY 15,1991.
tnestl�Y� If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
CUP 97-OOOSNAR 97-0003 AT 3 T MONCPOIE TOWER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
Regarding an application for a cond.itional use permit and a ) F I N A L O R D E R
'. variance for a 50-foot tall tower for cellular telephone ) CUP 97-0005
� ' antennas and an accessory suucture in the CBD zone at ) VAR 97-0003
. 1�62 SW Main Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (AT&T Wireless)
I. SUMMARY
1. The applicant requests approval of a condidonal use pennit for a 50-foot tall
tower that will support flush-mounted antennas for cellular telephone services and a related
12-foot x 28-foot equipment building and associated development. The proposed tower
and building will be situated in a roughly 3000-squar�e foot leased area behind (south ot� a
commercial building on the 0.63-acre parcel. A sight-obscuring fence is proposed to
enclose the tower and accessory building. Exisring vegetation will be retained outside the
fenced area. The applicant will place gravel over the remainder of the fenced area.
2. The applicant proposes to provide vehicular access between the site and SW
Main Street through the existing parking lot on the site. The existing parking lot is paved
to a point about 90 feet from the proposed tower location; beyond that point, the applicant
proposes to improve the access with gravel. Tigard Community Development Code (CDC)
18.108.080 requires access and parking to be paved. The applicant requests a variance to
that requirement to minirnize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno
Creek. The access drive will be situated within that 25-foot wide buffer area.
3. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff
recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without
objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer
approves the conditional use permit as provided herein.
II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings
in Secdons III and N of the Ciry of Tigard Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the "Staff
Report"), and the staff and agency comments in Sections V and VI of the Staff Report
III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS
The applicable approval standards are identified in Section N of the Staff Report.
N. HEARINGS AND RECORD
1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the
public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. The hearings officer closed the
public record at the conclusion of the hearing. The tesdmony is included herein as Exhibit
A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony).
These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall.
2. At the hearing,city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The
applicant's representadves, Mike Birndorf and Jeff Penick, accepted the Staff Report
without objections or cornecdons. Mr. Birndorf noted that the applicant intends to install a
sight-obscuring fence around the ground-mounted equipment rather than adding
landscaping. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by �presentative.
Xeanngs Offuer Find Ordti
CUP 97-OOOSNAR 97-0003 (ATd�T blain Strtet) Page 1
V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST
City staff recommended approval of the condidonal use permit and variance based on the
findings in Section N of the Staff Report. No one disputed those findings. The hearings
_ �. officer concludes the findings in Section N of the Staff Report accurately neflect the law
and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own, with
. the following additions:
1. The applicant modified the proposal at the hearing in this matter to substitute a
sight-obscuring fence for the proposed landscaping shown on the site plan in the
applicadon. Although CDC 18.100.11Q(A)encourages use of landscaping for screening
and buffering, a sight-obscuring fence also is pecTnitted for that purpose. In this case a
sight-obscuring fence provides adequate screening and buffering provided it sunounds the
ground-mounted equipment on all sides (except where the facility abuts a building).
a. It was not clear from the testimony that the applicant int�nds to fence the
west side of the facility site. The hearings officer finds the west side of the site should be
improved with a sight-obscuring fence or landscaping to buffer and screen the site from
view from the residential ar�ea further west and southwest of the site. Although the
residendal uses do not abut the site,they are only one lot removed. Also the residential
units ar�e at a higher elevarion than the site and will look down on the site. These facts
about the location and topography of the site and land in the viciniry warrant buffering and
screening on the west side of the site under CDC 18.120.180(A)(4).
2. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a condidonal use must comply with CDC
18.120.180 (Site Development Review). Based on CDC 18.12Q.180(A}(4), the hearings
officer finds that the tower should not incorporate any advertising or signage and should
not be lighted except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other
applicable agency or as approved by the planning d'uector for security or safery purposes.
3. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with the
applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. The hearings officer finds the land use
policies promote efficient use of land resources and minimization of adverse land use
impacts from development The hearings o�cer further finds that it makes more efficient
use of land and�duces potential adverse impacts of a telecommunications facility to have
multiple users sha�a tower rather than to build new towers. Therefore the hearings o�cer
concludes the applicant should be required to allow antennas for other telecommunications
service providers to be situated on the proposed tower and to allow associated transmission
equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or
building can accommodate such addiaonal antennas and equipment or can be modified to
do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with
such shared use as a condition of such shared use: provided further, such modification to
che condidonal use should be subject to applicable �view by the city. The applicant shall
respond prompdy and in;ood faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site.
4. The hearings officer finds a communications tower such as proposed in this case
has inherendy adverse visual unpacts. Those impacts are unavoidable for a woridng
communications facility. But, if the faciliry is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated,
the adverse visual impacts of the faciliry can be eliminated by removing the tower.
Therefo�the hearings officer finds the applicant should be required to remove the tower
within a reasonable rime after the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated.
The hearings officer finds the facility is abandoned, among other reasons, if all antennas
are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six months. The tower shall be
removed within 90 days of abandonment
Hearings�`'tcer Fina!Order
CUP 97-QOOSNAR 97-0003 (ATdcT,�lain Street) Page 2
VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION
1. Based on the fmdings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings ofticer
concludes that the proposed cond.itional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and
' standards of the Community Development Code,subject to applicable laws and condidons
- of approval warranted to address the potendal impacts of the conditional use.
� 2. In �cogtition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and
' incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony
and exhibits received in this macter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0005 and
VAR 97-0003, subject to the following conditions:
a. Before the city issues a building permit for the proposed tower, the
applicant shall submit a site plan to the planning director for review and approval.
(1} The site plan shall idencify where one (1) off-street parking
space will be provided for the communications facility.
(2) The site plan shall show where and what fencing, landscaping
or other permitted method of screening will buffer the ground-mounted equipment and
parking area on the communications facility site. Screening shall be provided on the east,
south and west sides of the communicadons facility site(i.e., on all sides except abutting
the commercial building north of the communications faciliry site). The applicant shall
maintain the approved screening in perpenrity as long as the applicant uses the site for a
communicadons facility.
(3) If lighting is proposed for security or safety purposes, the site
plan shall show all such lighting, subject to condition of approval b.
b. The tower shall not incorporate any advertising, signage, or lighting
except as required by the Federal Communicadons Commission or other applicable agency
with jurisdicaon; provided, the planning director may approve lighting deemed necessary
for security and safety purposes; provided further, permitted lighdng shall be designed,
situated and/or operated to minimize its off-site impacts.
c. The applicant shall allow antennas for other telecommunications service
providers to be situated on the proposed tower and shall allow associated transmission
equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or
building can accommodate such addidonal antennas and equipment or can be modiiied to
do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associaced with
such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further,such modification to
the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall
respond prompdy and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site.
d. The applicant shall remove the tower within 90 days after the
communications facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The facility is
presumed to be abandoned if all of the antennas are removed from the tower or are not
operated for at least siz consecutive months.
DA 's 8th d �
arry Eps in AICP
City of gar ' gs Officer
Hearings Offrct�Firra!Order
CUP 97-OOOSNAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 3
Agenda item: 2.1
Hearing Date: _Julv 7. 199T Time: T•00 PM
STAFF REPORT TO THE
- .�- HEARlNG'S OFFICER
cmr of no,►�c
. FOR THE CITY OF TiGARD, OREGON �°"""""'�'��
. s " .��Bcrter Comarurri
SECTION I: APPLICATI�N S��iuMeRv
CASES: FILE NAME� AT 8 T MONOPOLE TOWFR
Co�ditional Use PeRnit (CUP) 97-0005
Variance
(VAR) 97-0003
PROPOSAL: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for
a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and
associated equipment structures.
2. The applicant has aiso requested Variance approval to eliminate
the requirement for a paved surface to the proposed
communications facility.
APPLlCANT: AT& T Wireless Seniices OWNER: David & Christine Hammond
1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue
Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBO.
LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRlTERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134.
SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditionat Use Permit
and Variance wilt not adversety affect the health, safety and weffare of the City. Therefore,
staf� recommends APPROVAL, subject to the foHowing recommended conditions of
approval:
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 97-0OOSNAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 11
JNDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT,
THE F�LLOWING C�NDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
{Unless otherwise no�ed, the staff co�tact shail be Mark Roberts,
Ptanning Division (503) 639�171.)
1. The applicant shall modify the proposed site and/or landscape plan to provide one (1) ,
paved, off-street parking space for the service vehicle.
2. The applicant shall provide fencing, landscaping, or other permitted method of
screening of the ground mounted equipment. The screening shall be provided to the
west, south, and east of the leasehold area. The applicant shall maintain the
screening materials that are provided in perpetuity.
THtS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
The property is developed with a general retail bui(ding that is occupied by a paint store
use. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having
been filed for this property.
Vcinity InfoRnation:
To the north of the leasehold area is the existing paint store retail building. To the south is
a portion of the Main Street Apartments and vacant areas that are part of the Fanno Creek
floodplain area. To the west of this parcel is the main portion of the Main Street Apartment
property. To the east is the A-Boy property.
Site Information and Pr000sal Descriotion:
The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a retail building. A paved
driveway area to the east of the building. The applicant has requested Conditional Use
Permit approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications tower facility and related
equipment structures. A Variance to the requirement for paved access to the proposed
communications facility has also been requested.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOSNAR 97-0003-AT 3 T MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 11
SECTION IV: APPLICAB F RFVIFw rRITFQie eNn c��y����;�
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
ImQact Stud_v: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur
with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that
�� supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly p�oportional
, to the projected impacts of the development Alternatively, an applicant may
, specifically concur with the requirement for dedica:ion of right-of-way to the public
and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion
of a waiver statement Section 18.120.180(A)(8) requires right-vf-way dedication for
properties that are contiguous with the 100-year floodplain. Because the dedication of
public right-of-way does not appear to be roughly proportional to the impact of the
p�oposed unmanned utility facility this dedication requirement has not been
recommended.
Use Classification; The applicant is proposing to build a 50 foot cellular monopole.
This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code
Section 18.66 lists utilifies as a conditionally permitted use in the Central Business Zoning
District -
Dimensional Reauir�ments: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size
requirements, Developments within the Central Business Zoning District are required
to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Landscaping a minimum of 15% of the site
would require a total of 4,125 square feet landscaping on this 27,500 square foot site. The
site does not appear to have any existing fomnally developed landscaping. However,
wetlands or other natural areas have previously been permitted to be considered part of the
required landscape pe�centage when they are part of the subject property. Approximately
17,270 square feet of the site is within the Fanno Creek floodplain area and weUands, or
within the 25-foot buffer area.
The applicant has provided a proposed landscape plan for the overall site but not specifically
for the leasehold area. The plan provides new landscaping for a total of approximately 485
square feet of previously unimproved portions of the site. Wrthin the narrative, the applicant
states that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area will be provided with landscaping to
comply with the requiremen� The site and landscape plan and the applicants' narrative do
not make it clear if the new landscaping that is shown to be provided is to upgrade the
overall site or as screening for the ground mounted equipment. Because the site has no
formally developed landscaping, it is suggested that the proposed landscaping be provided
except where these areas are within the required 25-foot wetlands buffer. In these areas,
re-establishment of native riparian corridor plantings is suggested.
It is recommended that the Hearing's Officer find that because an area of approximateiy
17,270 square feet of the site is within Fanno Creek o� the 25-foot wetlands buffer, that the
proposed additional impervious surfaces do not cause the site to exceed the maximum
landscape Fercentage for the site. For this reason, landscaping a portion of the new
leasehold area does not appear to be required. Screening of the ground mounted
equipment in this area through the use of fencing or landscaping has been recomme�ded as
a Condition of Approval.
ST.'�FF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFlCER CUP 97-0005JVAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 11
etback: Sectio� 18.66. � states that there is no front � ' or side yard setbacic
facing the street No sid� �nd rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of
20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district
The site does not adjoin a zoning districi that is specifically designated for residential use.
The Central Business Zoning District does permit residential use as one (1) of the allowed
use types. Fo� this reason, it appears reasonable to apply this standard to adjoining
properties that are developed for residential use. The subject property does not directly
adjoin properties that are developed with residential uses. For this reason the proposed
monopole complies with this standard. '
Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building
located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject
to certain criteria. Sectio� 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended fo�
human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation
and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010.
Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that ail development projecLs fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that
street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size
classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper
of two inches at four feet in height The existing retail building was not developed with
street trees. It is recommended that this section not be found to be applicable to this
proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public SUeet. �
The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the
development of a new cellular communications use. Therefore, this determination is
consistent with the Non-ConfoRning Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C).
Screening�Qecial Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of
parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials
to be instailed should achieve a reiative balance between low lying and vertical
shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all paricing
areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking
spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the
landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from
vehicutar damage by some fomn of wheel guard or curb. Recently it has been
determined that because monopote facilities require a maintenance vehicie to access the
site percdically, that a minimum of one (1) off-street parfcing space needs to be provided or
proof that existing off-street paricing exceeds minimum standards. Based on the plan and
existing site constraints, it appears that the existing retail use is deficient in off-street parking
and that the only areas avai(able for this purpose are near the proposed leasehold area.
Because these areas are primarily behind the existing building, the paricing space will be
screened. In the event that the applicant is to construct a new space for this purpose
elsewhere that is visible from SW Main Street, the parlcing lot screening provisions would
then apply. Because one (1) new parking space would be required, other parking lot
landscape provisions are not applicable to this request.
ST.1FF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOIE PAGE 4 OF 11
Visual Clearan _A ero�Q; Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be
maintained on the comers of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the
intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the
triangular area foRned by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way
. and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a
straight line. A clear vision area shall co�tain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall
. structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet i� height
• The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the
.,
street center line grade, except that trees exceedi�g this height may be located in this
area, provided aU branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not
proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear
Vsion areas.
� � ' : Section 98.106.030 does not specity a minimum parki�g
ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular
communications monopvle. The applicant states that periodically a maintenance
vehicle will need to access the facility. The applicant has not provided parking to senie
this development Because the applicant states that a maintenance vehicle will be at the
sife, one (1) parking space has previously been required for this type of use. For this
reason, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to provide one (1) additional off
street parking space.
Access: Section 18.108.080 sta�es that commercial and industrial uses that require �
less than 100 parking spaces p�ovide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet,
and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet This use requires a single monthly
maintenance inspection, therefore, two-way access is not needed for the portion of the
property that would provide access to this facil' . For this reason,
�Y no specfic access width
is required for this use. The applicant has also requested a variance to paving any access
to this facility due to current wetlands buffer standards. The appfiqnt states that the Fire
District reviewed this appiiqtion and states that paved access is only required within 150
feet of the proposed facility. A paved driveway area onto the site currently exists. Through
the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, the required fire vehicle access to the
facility (as noted in the Agency Comment portion of this report) will need to be addressed
p�or to the issuance of Building Permits.
Site Develeompnt r�o..�e..� qRDroval Standarda Section 18.120.180(A)(1} requires
that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of
the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections
18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 1g,130, and 18.134. The proposal's
consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report.
�ite Develonment Review Additi na! ARoroval Stand rds: Section 18.120.180(A)(2-
18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily
covered by the provisions of the previousty listed sectians. These other standards
are addressed immediately below. The proposa) contains no elements related to the
provisions of 18.120.180(A)(2) (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.(A)(3) (Exterior Elevations),
18.120.180.(A)(5) (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.(A)(6) (Private Outdoor Areas:
Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use),
18.12Q.180.(A)(9) (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.(A)(12) (Public Transit),
18.120.180.(A)(17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval
STAFF REr�pF2T TO TIiE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOSNAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLF PAGE 5 OF 11
standards. Section 18. � 180.(A)(18} requires that other � �cable provisions of the
underiying zone be addres� �. These sections are addressed el��where within this report.
THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION
18.120.180(A)(2 -18): (4), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (15) and (16), and are addressed
immediately below.
Buffering. Screening and Com�ty Between Adjoining Uses: Section
18.120.18�.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of •
land uses. The appticant's proposal did not indicate specfic screening materials that would '
be utilized around the proposed fenced leasehold area. It is recommended that the
applicant provide a screening plan thai utilizes one of the approved types of screening
materials to sc�een the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 50-foot height and its
communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the
necessary clear line of site to the antennae struciure. The monopole itself has not been
designed to attract attention due to its p�oposed neutral gray color and unobtrusive
antennae panels that would be in line with the monopole itself.
Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that-on-site screening from view of adjoining
properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical
devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground
mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings.
Qoen Soace Dedication: Section 18.120.180.(A)(8) states that whe�e development is
allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the
dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the
floodplain. This area shall include portions within at a suitable elevation for the
construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway witfiin the floodplain in accordance with
the adopted bicycle/pedestrian pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the
adopted pedestriaNbicycle plan. Because the proposed development is for an
unmanned utility use, dedication of adjoining 100-year floodplain areas is not roughly
proportional to the impact of the development
Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior
lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vutnerable
to crime and shaU be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular tra�c.
The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concems with
this development, as proposed.
Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards
set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere
within this repo�t.
Parkina: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the OfF-Street Parking
Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of
Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report.
Landsca i�nc: Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape
provisions of Section 18.100. The applicable LandscaQe standards are reviewed
elsewhere within this report.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARtNG'S OFFtCER CUP 97-0005NAR 47-0003-AT�T MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 11
�inaae: Section 18.12Q.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water
runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. Based on the limited increased runoff that is
expec;ed, no specific new drainage structures have been recommended by ihe Engineering
Depariment.
- Provisions for the Handica��p.�; Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with
the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of
� Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable
' handicapped accessibility standards.
Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria
for a Conditional Use:
1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the
proposed use;
2. The characteristics of the site are suitable fo� the proposed use considering
size, shape, location, topography, and natural features.
3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.
4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified
by this chapter.
5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and
Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if
applicable, are met �
6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central
Business District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development
due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing development around the leasehold
area will partially screen the p�oposed monopole and fuily screen the ground mounted
equipment from view.
The applicant has not requested that public facilfies be made available to serve this
development. as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this
proposal, as reviewed within this staff report.
Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The ante�na faciiity will
not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the faciiity will be an
unstaffed utility site.
The development of this facility wifl not generate lacge scale construction impacts due to the
type of improvements that are p(anned. The site will a(so not require a parking lot. The
applicant has also proposed to b(end the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact
of the antenna. The antenna itseif is described in the applicanYs submittal as being a metal
pole wrth antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure.
No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area
requires no signficant grading or engineering to develop the site, as proposed. The
applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, -
leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003.AT b T MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 11
specific development critE �f the Comprehensive Plan that ac sses the development of
this type of utility facility a�_ .:ontained within the adopted Comm�nity Development Code.
The applicable development standards are addressed within this repo�t.
Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditio�s, a request
for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J)
that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or � -
concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would
provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development '
standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: �
The p�oposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title,
be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable
policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zo�ing district o�
vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material variance does
not appear to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed variance
is also, not in conflict with specfic policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape,
topography o� othe� circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and
which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the
narrow width availabie around the side yard of this p�operty, it does not appear possible to
locate the feasehold area at the end of the existing paved area and still p�ovide access to
the rear pofion of the subject parcel. Locating the monopole and the related equipment
would also be an encroachment into the wetlands buffer. Because access to this facility
would usually only be needed once or twice a month, a paved surface to the leasehold area
would rarely be used.
The use p�oposed will be the same as pennitted under this title and City standards
will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting
some economic use of the land; The Variance is necessary due to the Uni�ed Sewerage
Agency standards that limit deve(opment within 25 feet of a wetlands. The Variance would
not allow a use that is not pecmitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The Variance
allows limited economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an exisiing commercial(y
developed praperty.
Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage,
dramatic land fonns or parks will not be adversely affected any mo�e than would
occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance
allows the applicant to avoid constructing a new paved driveway within an environmentally
sensitive area, to an unmanned utility use that requires only periodic access. The nature of
the variance is limited such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by
this change. By its nature, the proposed variance will allow additional limited use of the site,
while compfying with cuRent standards for screening and buffering from a wetlands corridor.
Due to the location of existing paved areas, it appears possible to comply with Fire and Life
Safety standards while not constructing the required paved access.
STAFF REPCRT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT b T MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 11
The hardship is �ot self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance
that wouid alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints
such as tha deveioped nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for
access of !nis proposed facility diciate the limited need for construciion of a driveway. The
.
cucrent wetlands buffer standards were adopted in 1991, years after the existing retail
- .� building was developed. Because limited maintena�ce vehicfe access is all that is required
to this type of facility, the variance provides relief from a development standard of limited
: importance given the rype of proposed use.
;
�ECTION V• OTHER STe�� COMMENTS
The Engineering Departr�nent has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this
sise. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approvai
have been recommended conceming street or sidewalk improvements. Because the
applipnt has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions
have been recommended conceming the provision of public utilities.
The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following
comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six
(6) feet in height.
No other comments or objections have been received.
�ECTION VI• AGEN _Y COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire 8� Rescue has reviewed this request and has provided the
following comments: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior
wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior
of the building. An approved tumaround is required if the remaining distance to an
approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the nre apparatus access road, is
greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1).
When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system,
the requirements for fire apparatus access many be modified as approved by the Chief.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1).
Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15
feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not
less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1).
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easify
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than
12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2).
STAFF 1REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT�T MONOPQIE PAGE 9 OF 11
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable
of supporting such loading.
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. ��. .
The inside tuming radius and outside tuming radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 �
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3). r
Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved tumaround. Diagrams of approved tumarounds are available from the
fire districi. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4).
Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent
with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec.
902.2.2.6). Intersections and tumarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for
crowning for water run-off. - �
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parlced
vehicles, "No Paricing' signs shall be instal(ed on one or both sides of the roadway and in
tumarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - F1RE�
LANE - TOW AWAY Z�NE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have
black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(I)(2) � (3)).
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked 'NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide
by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2).
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
ftow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one
(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1)
additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire
hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the buiiding and their locations shall be approved
by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1}.
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. �UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus
access roadway. (UFC Sec 903.4.2.4}.
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or
the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A woricsheet for calculating the
required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3).
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 9T-0OO.SNAR 97-0003-AT 3 T MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 11
Approved fi�e apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC
Sec. 8704).
_ '
No other comments or objections have been received.
— J�ne 27. 19q7
PREPARED BY: Maric Roberts, AICP DATE
Associate Planner
'� • ,J • _ June 27. 1997
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
�curPlNmarlcdcup97-05.rep
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFlCER CIIP 47-0005JVAR 97-0003-AT 3 T MONOPpLE PAGE 11 OF 11
�
t
.
� :.
L.:.
V
1 '
� �---� �
- L� \
� ��� � �
� ,�
� ��� I � �� � Z
+ . � r-e•x zr-9�r�ae�catm c-c.�R�e�r s►�t�
\ 4 � z �-�rioNOPO�F Ta�av 3 aHra�. Z
�\ i Ra�¢Foo�rt�c�s�eY on��s�.
.�'� \ 3. CaRAV�t YAf�. Z
�• � 4. LFsL�fED Al�A PTaOF'�RTY LA�(T�HE DEfJ �
D8C.4Ff O'� �I� T 6. T�BMK �
�� i I zS'�.��P,�. ��� .�
, �ez ua�sr�ia�,s�.r.�
I I�'� i�l 'e` a Dcs7r�G i�ic�. �� C.
� �;�� ��1 � � �. C�,RA�A�A WTH R�SPAC�S.
'``\ :i' ' � �� �
: � � �
L,ar�F�,�a.�sF �
� \
LMOSC��•225 SF \ �
` � �■
�� � �
� � r
� L
� O
�
`
-
- � V
P � Q i' PLAt� � c,:.�� No.
� A.T. � T Mo�opole
� � H 1 B I i �rI � P s Mai� Stteet Site
CUP 97- 0005
� VAR 97- 0003
• J.
�� � � �I�� '�r�� �
��� � � �� �
�� � ` �, , � ..� ,,
� ��..., � �`, ,�� ,
� J'�� .�' '. , ,
� � I��.� ��.. -����
♦�1 ��j�
� �
♦ -
..,.. �
♦ �
♦
` 1
• � '
�..�' `i�r , , , �� � 1
., � • , �.�, i �
��•. � �i
• ,� / ' ♦ Ji /
. ` ``, �s �'
` � �+ � ♦ � �•.
�j� �� � �
�• ��
�� . . � � �� •
� '1' �� -
� �
♦ _,
, �, � � �
.. � � ...� =-:
, • •�
, -.. �
' , .�
1:- ♦ ♦
� • �� �
�► ♦
�� .
y � � .
� ♦
♦ .� ♦ .
♦ ♦
♦
�� .
� •
♦ �
. ,
�� �►
♦ � ��-= �!� •
♦ ��: •- ♦
,� �'.-• y•.• ..
�; � , • ,. �
.� ` ,,
�- ♦ ♦� ���. ♦�t► .�
♦ ♦ I � )
. � � � � � � ` r `,
• ♦ ♦ ♦ �� ♦ ���,�:, �
�!s ♦ • � ►�: �i
� ,
� � �
� � � � � �
- c• •� • r_ - I i ( I I I (
CRII Of TIOARD
Conemun:ty�Des��eCopment
S(caping;��BettesCommunity
� PUBLIC HEARIHG HOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY.
JULY 7. 1997 AT�QQ PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL
B�ULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO(S): CONDITIOHAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0005
VARIANCE [VARI 91-0003
FILE TITLE: AT�T MONOPOLE TOWER
APPLICANT: AT 8� T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond
. 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue
Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005
REPRESENTATIVE:Mike Bimdorf, Project Manager
W& H Pacific
8405 SW Nimbus Avenue
Beaverton, OR 97008-7120
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular
communications monopole tower and related equipment structure. A Variance
has also been requested to the develpment standard requiring paved access to
the leasehold area.
LOCATION: . _ 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101.
ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
� central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density
residential, and mixed uses.
APPLICABLE
REVlEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER
18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY
COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO
ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL
INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD -
TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE
ARRANGEMENTS.
CUP 97-0OOSNAR 97-0003 AT d T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF 7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING
PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE
CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANO INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE
HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION. OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION.
iF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 16. 1997, ANY PARTY IS
ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE
HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST
SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT
THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6).
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL
OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA
ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN
SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE
HEARING ON THE REC�UEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO AILOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORlTY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY
THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C�DE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A
COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT
ISSUE.
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTlON AT
NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TVVENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE
CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A
CDPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE
OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE
TIME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER �AABK ROBERTS AT (503) 639�171,
"'GARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223.
_ �z����✓" ��''
�
�
!�
E ''�
P
�
�
. .��.
CUP 97-0OOWAR 97-OOQ3 AT 3 T MONOPOIF TOVYER NOTICE OF 717/97 PUBLIC HF�21NG
)RIGINAL
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9a�
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 NOtICe TT 8 8 Fi 8
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising R E C E f V E D
:ity of Tigard • ❑ 7earsneet Natice �UL 0 2 1997
.3125 547 Hall Blvd.
'igard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit CITY OF TIGARD
�ccounts Payable • The following wili be considered by the Tigard Hearings 01
Monday,July 7,1997 at 7:00 P.M.,ac,T�gard Civic Center—To�
� 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon.Both public,oral anc
testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter wil]be co
in accordance with the rules of Chapter 1832 of the Tigard M�
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Code,and rules and procedums of the Hearings Officer.Failure to
ATE OF OREGON, issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or e•
�UNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' sufficient lo allow the hearings authority and all parties to i
1 precludes an appeal,and failure to specify the criterion fr
Kathv SnVder Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at�
ing fvst duly sworn,depose and say that I am the Advertising, comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion.
ector,or his principal clerk,of theTlqard—Tua a �n T�mes �nformation may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13]
iewspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling(503)639-417
i 193.020;published at_ Ti qa rr� in the pUBL[C HEARING:
�resai�f count and state;that the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)97-0005/..
earina—A�P&T r4onopole Tower ( W rla�nl VARIANCE(VAR)97_ppp3
irinted copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the � AT&T MONOPOL,E TOWER
The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall c
ire issue of said newspaper(or nNF. successive and � commuaications monopole tower and related equipment struct
isecutive in the following issues: Variance has also been requested to the development standard rec
paved access to the leasehold area.LOC,ATION:12562 SW Main
sne 26,1997 � WC'fM2S102AC,Tax Lot 01101.ZONE:Central Business,pi
CBD.The CBD zoninR district provides for a concentrated,c
commetcial office,and retail area which also p�ovi es civic,high de
residential,and mixed uses.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITEI
Community Development Code Chapters 18.66,1g.96, 18.100,18
18.106,1g,ipg,1g.12Q 18.130 and 18.134. .
�
�scribed and sworn to efore me thi47_Fth r7a} r,f Tiina�lgg �
Not Public for Oregon
Commission Expires: � �
FIDAVIT � �
I ' �
I ' - j ,,,•
P
,� ;.: t ;,,.
CITY OF TIGARD c�nr oF noaen
HEARINGS OFFICER S���A���o meunity
IULY 7,1991-7:00 P.M.
AGEHDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 AT 8 T MONOPOLE TOWER
Conditional Use PeRnit(CUP) 97-0004
LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot OQ400.
PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot
tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING
DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:
Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108 and 18.130.
2.2 AT 8�T MONOPOLE TOWER
Conditional Use Permit(CUP) 97-0005
Variance (VAR) 97-0003
LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. PROPOSAL:
The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular
communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. The applicant
has aiso requested Variance approval to eliminate the requirement for a paved surface to
the proposed communications facility. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business
District; CBD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District;
CBD. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters
18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134.
2.3 THE RITE CENTER
Conditional Use Permit(CUP) 97-0006
LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500
and 02600. Located in the eastem terminus of SW Tiedeman Street and SW Geenburg
Road. PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a
36-bed homeless facility. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density.
ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12.
3. OTHER BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2
7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:lpattylmasterslagendho.mst
CITY OF TIGARD
HEARtNG'S OFFICER
JULY 7, 1997 - 7:00 P.M.
TOWN HALL
TIGARD CITY HALL,
13125 SW HALL B�ULEVARD
TIGARO, �R 97223
�/ �nyone wishing to speAk on An A9endA �tem
shoutd si9n on the AppropetiAte sign-�n sheet(s�.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired
hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by
noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171,
Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications
Devices for the Dea fl. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to
arrange for the following services:
7 Qualified sign language interpreters for persons
with speech or hearing impairments; and
➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these senrices must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is
important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of
Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the
meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above if you are
requesting such services.
(OVER FOR HEARING AGENDA ITEM(S)
TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2
7!7/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:lpattylmasterslagendho.mst
Agenda Item: �.�
Hearing Date: July 7.1997 Time: 7:00 PM
.�
+► STAFF REPORT TO THE
� � HEARING'S OFFICER cirr oF noaRc
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON eo""""'"�'�`�°�'""``
S�ra � �[�Btttct Corumuni
SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASES: F1LE NAME: AT � T MONOPOLE TOWER
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0005
Variance (VAR) 97-0003
PROPOSAL: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for
a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and
associated equipment structures.
2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to eliminate
the requirement for a paved surface to the proposed
communications facility.
APPLICANT: AT &T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond
1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue
Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD.
LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100,
18.102, 18.1�6, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134.
�ECT10N II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearing`s Officer find that the proposed Conditiona[ Use Permit
and Variance will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore,
staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of
approval:
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 11
CONDITI4NS OF APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT,
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: ' t
(Untess othervvise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts,
Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) =�
1. The applicant shall modify the proposed site andlor landscape plan to provide one (1)
paved, off-street parking space for the service vehicle.
2. The applicant shall provide fencing, landscaping, or other permitted method of
screening of the ground mounted equipment. The screening shall be provided to the
west, south, and east of the leasehold area. The applicant shall maintain the
screening materials that are provided in perpetuity.
THtS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID F�R 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DEClSION.
SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Historv:
The property is developed with a general retail building that is occupied by a paint store
use. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having
been filed for this property.
Vicini Information:
To the north of the leasehold area is the existing paint store retail building. To the south is
a portion of the Main Street Apartments and vacant areas that are part of the Fanno Creek
floodplain area. To the west of this parcel is the main portion of the Main Street Apartment
property. To the east is the A-Boy property.
Site Information and Proc�osal Descriotion:
The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a retail building. A paved
driveway area to the east of the building. The applicant has requested Conditional Use
Permit approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications tower facility and related
equipment structures. A Variance to the requirement for paved access to the proposed
communications facility has also been requested.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOIE PAGE 2 OF 11
SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
� Impact Studv: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur
, with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that
"� supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional
to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may
specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public
and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion
of a waiver statement. Section 18.120.180(A)(8) requires right-of-way dedication for
properties that are contiguous with the 100-year floodplain. Because the dedication of
public right-of-way does not appear to be roughly proportional to the impact of the
proposed unmanned utility facility this dedication requirement has not been
recommended.
Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 50 foot cellular monopole.
This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code
Section 18.66 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the Central Business Zoning
District.
Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size
requirements. Developments within the Central Business Zoning District are required
to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Landscaping a minimum of 15% of the site
would require a total of 4,125 square feet landscaping on this 27,500 square foot site. The
site does not appear to have any existing foRnally developed landscaping. However,
wetlands or other natural areas have previously been permitted to be considered part of the
required landscape percentage when they are part of the subject property. Approximately
17,270 square feet of the site is within the Fanno Creek floodplain area and wetlands, or
within the 25-foot buffer area.
The applicant has provided a proposed landscape plan for the overall site but not specifically
for the leasehold area. The plan provides new landscaping for a total of approximately 485
square feet of previously unimproved portions of the site. Within the narrative, the applicant
states that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area will be provided with landscaping to
comply with the requirement. The site and landscape plan and the applicants' narrative do
not make it clear if the new landscaping that is shown to be provided is to upgrade the
overall site or as screening for the ground mounted equipment. Because the site has no
formally developed landscaping, it is suggested that the proposed landscaping be provided
except where these areas are within the required 25-foot wetlands buffer. In these areas,
re-establishment of native riparian corridor plantings is suggested.
It is recommended that the Hearing's Officer find that because an area of approximately
17,270 square feet of the site is within Fanno Creek or the 25-foot wetlands buffer, that the
proposed additional impervious surFaces do not cause the site to exceed the maximum
landscape percentage for the site. For this reason, landscaping a portion of the new
leasehold area does not appear to be required. Screening of the ground mounted
equipment in this area through the use of fencing or landscaping has been recommended as
a Condition of Approval.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT�T MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 11
Setback: Section 18.61 0 states that there is no front �_�d or side yard setback
facing the street No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of -
20 feet shall be required whe�e a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district
The site does not adjoin a zoning district that is specifically designated for residential use.
The Central Business Zoning District does permit residential use as one (1) of the allowed
use types. For this reason, it appears reasonable to apply this standard to adjoining �..
properties that are developed for residential use. The subject property does not directly
adjoin properties that are developed with residential uses. For this reason the proposed
monopole complies with this standard.
Building Height Limitations - Exce�tions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building
located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject
to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for
human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation
and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010.
Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a
public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that
street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size
classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper
of two inches at four feet in height The existing retail building was not developed with
street trees. It is recommended that this section not be found to be applicable to this
proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. �
The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the
development of a new cellular communications use. Therefore, this determination is
consistent with the Non-ConfoRning Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C).
Screening SQecial Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of
parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials
to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical
shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking
areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking
spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minirr�um dimension on the
landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be p�otected from
vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Recently it has been
deteRnined that because monopole facilities require a maintenance vehicle to access the
site periodically, that a minimum of one (1) off-street parking space needs to be provided or
proof that existing off-street parking exceeds minimum standards. Based on the plan and
existing site constraints, it appears that the existing retail use is deficient in off-street parking
and that the only areas available for this purpose are near the proposed leasehold area.
Because these areas are primarily behind the existing building, the parking space will be
screened. In the event that the applicant is to construct a new space for this purpose
elsewhere that is visible from SW Main Street, the parking lot screening provisions would
then apply. Because one (1) new parlcing space would be required, other parking lot
landscape provisions are not applicable to this request.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 11
Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shali be
maintained on the comers of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the
intersection of a public street and a private d�iveway. A visual clearance area is the
triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way
and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a
� straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall
structure, signs, temporary or peRnanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height
The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the
street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this
area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not
proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear
�sion areas.
�Ilinimum Off-Street Parkina: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking
ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular
communications monopole. The applicant states that periodically a maintenance
vehicle will need to access the facility. The applicant has not provided parking to serve
this development. Because the applicant states that a maintenance vehicle will be at the
site, one (1) pa�lcing space has previously been required for this type of use. For this
reason, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to provide one (1) additional off-
street parking space.
Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require
less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet,
and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet This use requires a single monthly
maintenance inspection, therefore, two-way access is not needed for the portion of the
property that would provide access to this facility. For this reason, no specific access width
is required for this use. The applicant has also requested a variance to paving any access
to this facility due to current wetlands buffer standards. The applicant states that the Fire
District reviewed this application and states that paved access is only required within 150
feet of the proposed facility. A paved driveway area onto the site cuRently exists. Through
the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, the required fire vehicle access to the
facility (as noted in the Agency Comment portion of this report) will need to be addressed
prior to the issuance of Building Pennits.
Site Develooment Review - ARuroval Standards• Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires
that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of
the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections
18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.134. The proposal's
consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report.
�ite DeveloQment Review - Additional A��roval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2-
18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily
covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards
are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the
provisions of 18.120.180(A)(2) (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.(A)(3) (Exterior Elevations),
18.120.180.(A)(5) (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.(A)(6) (Private Outdoo� Areas:
Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use),
18.120.180.(A)(9) (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.(A)(12) (Public Transit),
18.120.180.(A)(17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 11
standards. Section 18. .180.(A)(18) requires that othe� . . ,�licable provisions of the
underlying zone be addressed. These sections are addressed elsewhere within this report.
THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION
18.120.180(A)(2 -18): (4), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (15) and (16), and are addressed
immediately below.
Bufferina. Screening and Compatibilitv Between Adjoining Uses: Section
18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of
land uses. The applicant's proposal did not indicate specific screening materials that would
be utilized around the proposed fenced leasehold area. It is recommended that the
applicant provide a screening plan that utilizes one of the approved types of screening
materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 50-foot height and its
communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the
necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been
designed to attract attention due to its proposed neutral gray color and unobtrusive
antennae panels that would be in line with the monopole itself.
Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that-on-site screening from view of adjoining
properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical
devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground
mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings.
O�oace Dedication: Section 18.120.180.(A)(8) states that where development is
allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the
dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the
floodplain. This area shall include portions within at a suitable elevation for the
construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with
the adopted bicycle/pedestrian pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the
adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Because the proposed development is for an
unmanned utility use, dedication of adjoining 100-year floodplain areas is not roughly
proportional to the impact of the development.
Crime Prevention and Safetv: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior
lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable
to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concems with
this development, as proposed.
Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards
set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere
within this report.
Parkina: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking
Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of
Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report.
Landsca i�ng;. Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape
provisions of Section 18.100. The applicable Landscape standards are reviewed
elsewhere within this report.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 11
Qrainaae: Section 18.120.180.(A){15) requires compliance with the surface water
runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. Based on the limited increased runofF that is
. expected, no specific new drainage structures have been recommended by the Engineering
Department.
Provisions for the Handica�ed: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with
the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 48T. Prior to issuance of
Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable
handicapped accessibility standards.
Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria
for a Conditional Use:
1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the
proposed use;
2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering
size� shape, location� topography, and natural features.
3. Alt required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.
4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified
by this chapter.
5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and
Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if
applicable, are met �
6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The use, as p�oposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central
Business District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development
due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing development around the leasehold
area will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted
equipment from view.
The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this
development. as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this
proposal, as reviewed within this staff report.
Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will
not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an
unstaffed utility site.
The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the
type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The
applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact
of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicanYs submittal as being a metal
pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure.
No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area
requires no sign�cant grading or engineering to develop the site, as proposed. The
applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use,
leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-OOOSNAR 97-0003-AT�T MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 11
specific development crit� of the Comprehensive Plan that a�._,esses the development of
this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code.
The applicable development standards are addressed within this report.
Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request
for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J)
that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or
concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would
provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development
standard may be approved where the following findings can be made:
The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title,
be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable
policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or
vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material variance does
not appear to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed variance
is also, not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape,
topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and
which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the
narrow width available around the side yard of this property, it does not appear possible to
locate the leasehold area at the end of the existing paved area and still provide access to �
the rear portion of the subject parcel. Locating the monopole and the related equipment
would also be an encroachment into the wetlands buffer. Because access to this facility
would usually only be needed once or twice a month, a paved surface to the leasehold area
would rarely be used.
The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards
will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting
some economic use of the land; The Variance is necessary due to the Unfied Sewerage
Agency standards that limit development within 25 feet of a wetlands. The Variance would
not allow a use that is not permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The Variance
allows limited economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially
developed property.
Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage,
dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would
occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance
allows the applicant to avoid constructing a new paved driveway within an environmentally
sensitive area, to an unmanned utility use that requires only periodic access. The nature of
the variance is limited such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by
this change. By its nature, the proposed variance will allow additional limited use of the site,
while complying with current standards for screening and buffering from a wetlands corridor.
Due to the location of existing paved areas, it appears possible to comply with Fire and Life
Safety standards while not constructing the required paved access.
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 11
The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance
that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints
. such as the developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for
access of tnis proposed facility dictate the limited need for construction of a driveway. The
current wetlands buffer standards were adopted in 1991, years after the existing retail
' building was developed. Because limited maintenance vehicle access is all that is required
to this type of facility. the variance provides relief from a development standard of limited
importance given the type of proposed use.
SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this
site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval
have been recommended conceming street o� sidewalk improvements. Because the
applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions
have been recommended conceming the provision of public utilities.
The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following
comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six
(6) feet in height.
No other comments or objections have been received.
�CTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire � Rescue has reviewed this request and has provided the
following comments: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior
wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior
of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an
approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is
greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1).
When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system,
the requirements for fire apparatus access many be modified as approved by the Chief.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1).
Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15
feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not
less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1).
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than
12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight).
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2).
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 11
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable
of supporting such loading. ' -
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is '
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code.
The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3).
Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the
fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4).
Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent
with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec.
902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for
crowning for water run-off.
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles, °No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in
turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE �
LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above
ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have
black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(I)(2) & {3)).
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide
by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2).
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one
(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1)
additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire
hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved
by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1).
Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus
access roadway. (U FC Sec 903.4.2.4).
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or
the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the
required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3).
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT&T MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 11
, Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC
Sec. 8704).
No other comments or objections have been received.
June 27. 1997
PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE
Associate Planner
'� • r-� • June 27. 1997
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
i:curplNmarkNcup97-05.rep
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT 8 T MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 11
�
t
�
�
u
� �—O �
� � �
s
� 25�SETBAC,JC \ �/
/ io
� � I :, � z
�arES:
+ .� , � tr-6�x n�-9��ae��c.arm �u�T s�r� �
\ � 2. 50'-0'hIOPIOF'�OLE TOUER IW 3 MREMIAS. z
� ITOLLER FOOTP1Cs DESIGN BT Ot4�J.
�� 3. GRAVEL YAFtD.
+�e� 1 � 4. L�A�ED AF�A F'ROf'ERTY LME(T�BE DET.J �
4�'�C.� \ ,�I 5. F�M10 CR�FlC I a
�i� , � 6. TOP OF B�MK
�.4•E0 3F. I� I I) Z. 5'-0'3f�JARE CCP1C.PAD. L NOT� �
� �i > > P�R UBLr,3EGtIQ�I 3306.[a)EkC� ICN.
� ��'�,� „ a 8. DdSTPG F$ICF. C
�I I�� 3 WAV£GUlDE
'�\ �':I; .;!� �,,i�' \ �m. c�ava Par�ca� e�a u�u�z�sP s_
I,,I 9 �
� '' � � 0
� 2 � . � �
� !.<1�APE AF2EA•8m SF. �
� \ � 1�
L�SCA��EA•225 5F \ V
\ \ ��
�� � �
s �
� L
� O
�
�-
� � V
PLQT PLAt� �! c,:,s� No.
; A.T. � T Monopole
� : H1BiT � � � s MainStreetSite
CUP 97- 0005
IVAR 97- 0003
1 �
• ��
4,Y
Sl'_'—_—� s�'
I
•
�
��
�
�
� �
�
�'T
S'T
�EC �� �
, �
P > '_'
_ �
�
c�
_
� a-
�
ca
�
._
�
0
�
� �
� U
� �
_ ___
Vicinity IVlap N CUP 91-0005 �
Note: Map is nat to scale A AT &T Mono ole Tower
p
, �.
,,.
� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
' Community rUevelopment
RECENED PLANNING ShapingA�etter Community
DATE: MaY 21,1991 MAY 2 21997
�
T0: lohn RoY,Proper4l Mana9er ��pF TIGp►RO
FROM: Cii�of Tigard Planning Diuisid STAFF CONTACT: MarK Roberts[x3111
Phone:[5031639-4111 fax:[50316847297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0005/VARIANCE[YARI 97-0003
➢ AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER Q
The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and
related equipment structure. A Variance has atso been requested to the development standard requiring
paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot
01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed
uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(�Please provicfe the folrawing inforn�ation)Name of Person[sl Commentlng:
� Phone Numder[sl:
CUP 97-OOO5NAR 97-0003 AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
�\�/
- ���
�"s`" ��� Tualatin Valiey Fire 8� Rescue
Jr �
i--. t�`
/. �_ j
' �'� Fire Prevention
` , �
\��i pES J 4755 SW Griffith Onve - PO Box 4755 - Beaverton,OR 97076 - (503)52&2469 • FAX 526-2538 ,
�LETTER ❑ NO LETTER TIME
To w1�'�o� � a(S �vi-r S Date: � 4
❑WC ❑CC� MC ❑ BV QB TI ❑TU ❑ DU ❑SH ❑WI ❑KC Jurisdiction Fle Number. ���
Project Name: T��� �� C,�.. ��;, �N Project Address: 1 �-S�� s� (,4i¢,�J �''—
/
NF&R Fle Number. (Whenever refeRing to this project please include the NFBR Fle Number)
Project approved
�Project not approved-Please address items checiced below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the:
. �NF&R Rre Marshal's Office
❑ Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the NF8�R Fre Marshal's Office
Project conditlonally approved subject to correction of items checked below.
This fs a Flre and Life Safety Plan Review and is baaed o�the 1994 Editlona of the UnNorm Flro Code(UFC)and those sections
of the Unitonn Butlding Code(UBC)and Unitortn Mechanlcai Code(UMC) specifically reterencing the fire department,and other
local ordinances,regulations and guidelines.
�1) FlRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the buildng as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the
building, An approved tumaround is required'rf the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway,as measured along
� the fire apparatus access road,is greater than 150 feet(UFC Sec.902.2.1)
2) FlRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are
completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinlder system,the requirements for fire apparatus access may be
modfied as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.902.2.1 Exception 1)
3) ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS: Where there are 25 or more dwellings,an approved second fire apparatus access roadway
must be provided to a aty/county roadway o�access easement (UFC Sec.902.2.2)
�4) FlRE APPAFiATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fre apparatus access roads shall have an
unobstructed driving surface with a wictth of not less than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an
unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.1)
�5} SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fre apparatus acces,s roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
d�stinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load(wheel load)and
50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec.9022.22)
� Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading.
�Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished consUuction is in accordance with the
approved plans or the requirements of the Fre Code.
�6)TURNING RADIUS: The inside tuming radius and outside tuming radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully,
as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.3)
�) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved
tumaround. Diagrams of app�oved tumarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.4)
8) BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final co�ttuction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be
designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials Standard Spec�cations for
� Highway Bridges.' The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.5)
9) NO PARKlNG SIGNS: Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles,'No
Parking"signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in tumarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs
shall read`NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY ZONE,ORS 98.810'and shall be installed with a Gear space above
ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white
tiackground. (UFC Sec.901.4.5.(1) (2) 8�(3))
10) GRADE: Fre apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15
percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet (UFC Sec.90222.6). Interseclio�u and tumarounds shatl be level(maximum 5°k)
witf�the exception of crowning for water run-off. \,
Fiie Number
�11) PAINTED CURBS: Fre apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at
each 25 feet. Lettenng shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.(UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
�,12) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF F1RE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building
shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one(1)
fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM)required fire flow and one(1)additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM
or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be
� approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1)
13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-FIRE HYDRANTS• No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than
250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire
appatatus access roadway.(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLlNGS-FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at
each intersection. Inter►nediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 5Q0 feet from a hydrant as
measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways.
Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.2)
� 15) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved
fire apparatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.4)
16) FIRE HYDRANT/FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION• A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department
connection(FDC). 'F�e hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side oi the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.
903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1)
17) FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS• Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is
bemg protected. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.5)
�18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-REG�UIRED FIRE FLOW The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per
minute{GPM)or U�e available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet fo�calculating the�equired fire flow is
available fram the Fre Marshal's office. (UFC Sec.903.3)
19) SINGLE FAMILY DWELUNGS-REOUIRED FlRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and
duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger,the required fire flow shall be
determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1.(UFC Appendix III-A,Sec.5)
20) RURAL BUILDINGS-REOUIRED FlRE FLOW Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be ca�ulated in accordance with
National Fre Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fre Marshal's office for special help and other
� requirements that will apply, (UFC Sec.903.3)
21) ACCESS AND FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and
fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC 5ec.
8704)
22) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fre Marshal's Office for an
application and instruciions regarding installation and placement
23) RE�UIRED INSPECTfONS: Please contact the Fre Marshal's oftice at the appropriate times for inspection of the following:
_24)
_25)
cc: �}4PPLICANT ❑ PLANNING DEPT �UILDING DEPT
�lan Revi r Slgnatur 1
/
.. . , -:k' . �
J'.. .
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community�Drr.elopment
- �-�flE�iEIVED PLANNING ,ShapingA�etter Community
on�: May 2�,1997 MAY 2 2 1997
T0: Brian Ra9er,Deuelopment Review Engineer ��y OE T
;
FAOM: Cit11 of Tigard Planning Division STAFF 0�lTACT: MarK Roderts[x3111
i
Phone:[5031639�171 F��{50316847297
RE: .,�,_\ ���
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 97-0005/VARIANCE[YART�-8AA3 -- ��
➢ AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER Q
The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and
related equipment structure. A Variance has also been requested to the development standard requiring
paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot
01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed
uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(�e p�re the fa��tnfo�r�n)Name of Person[sl Commendng: � � �� �
�=--�-�� C - ��-- I
Phone Number[sL• k �,i�
CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
�✓
��
� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
� �ommunity I�eveCopment
� RECEIVED PUWNING ShapingA Better Community
DATE: May 21,1991 MAY 2 3 1997
T0: Dauid Scot�Buildin9 Official
CITYOFT�WD
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Diuision STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roherts[x31A
Phone:[5031639�171 Fax:[50316847291
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0005/VARIANCE[VARI 97-0003
➢ AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER Q
The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and
related equipment structure. A Variance has also been requested to the development standard requiring
paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot
01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed
uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
/�.PPf�J` ! l ��1�I�1 '�'l�E( ��. i �,i�� .` c C/ �' �/ 1 /) ��� �v 1^'O/''Jnl1/
w��i� � f �. � ,/. ���' /_
(�lease provicte the folCo-wi�ng infornuction)Name of Person[sl Commen�ng�_�� �� �
Phone Number[sl: �
CUP 97-OOOSNAR 97-0003 AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
4
fi TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE
� FIRE PREVENTION
4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538
RECENED PUINNING
June 4, 1997
JUN 11 �ggr
Mark Roberts CITY OF TIGARp
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 S.W. Hail Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: AT&T Monopole Tower
12562 SW Main Street
CUP 97-0005
File Number: 1557-97
Dear Mark:
This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 editions of the
Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and
Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other
local ordinances and regulations.
Plans for the above noted project are not approved. Please address the following items
and resubmit plans to this office for review and approval.
Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story
of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An
approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting
roadway, as measured along tne fire apparatus access road, is greater than i50 feet. �uFC
Sec. 902.2.1)
When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the
Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception I)
Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15
feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not
less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1)
"Worktng"Smoke Detectors Save Lives
Mark Roberts
June 4, 1997
Page 2
Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable
from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point
load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec.
902.2.2.2)
• Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will
be capable of supporting such loading.
• Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished
construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the
fire code.
The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45
feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC 9022.2.3)
Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the
fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4)
Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles and maintain the minimum 20 foot wide unobstructed driving surface, "No
parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds
as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW
AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level
of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red
letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5(1)(2)&(3))
Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE", at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide
by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2)
The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire
flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than
one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and
one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM.
Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be
approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
f
Mark Roberts
June 4, ]997
Page 3
No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet
from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the
building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus
access roadway (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4)
The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM)
or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating
the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be
installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC
Sec. 8704)
If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469
referring to the above noted file number.
Sincerely,
Gene Birchill, DFM
Plans Examiner
GB:kw
cc: W&H Pacific
8405 SW Nimbus Avenue
Beaverton, OR 97008-7120
..
�, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
� Community�UeveCopment
ShapingA BetterCommunity
DATE: May 21,199)
T0: PER AITACHED
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Dnrision STAFF CONTACT: MarK Roberts[x31T1
Ph�ne:[5031639-�171 Fax:[50316841297
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)91-0005/VARIANCE[VARI 97-0003
➢ AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER Q
The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and
related equipment structure. A Variance has also been requested to the development standard requiring
paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot
01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed
uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - June 2, 1997. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
��lease pro�vi�e the fo��tnfo�t�n�Name of Person[sl Commentlng:
Phone Number[sl:
CUP 97-OOO5NAR 97-0003 AT 8 T MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
- NOTIFICATION LIST FOR lANO USE&DEYELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
;
c�T Area:[e�cE� ts�tw� CITIZEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS �Place for n�i�w In librarfl CR Baok[s)
FILE NO[Sl: ��� �'`7— �ODS� V��.`�j`��3 FILE NAME[Sl: �: 1 � � � �o�o ��
CITY OFFICES
VANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,PlanNnySupervisor�.' NITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./owp��s�a Tsono��s POLICE DEPT./c��mea,e�e�,�o�onKe,
BUILDING DIV./David Scott,e���a��9orrK�.� ��INEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,ww�„��R.V�«,e�9��ee� _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,ODarsUOmManager
_CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley�C�yRSCadar _✓VrCRATIONS DEPT./Johil ROy,v�ovenvM��ay�� _OTHER
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
`� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SNVM Program
Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street
(place In pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
IOCAI AND STATE IURiSDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON CITY OF TUALATIN OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
PO Box 4755 Planning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE
Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337
Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207
Larry Conrad,Senio�Planner OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
_Mike Matteucci,Nepnbn�a.c�m. METRO OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE
600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon 5treet,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
City Manager US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
PO Box 23483 Paulette Allen,Grovrth Manayement Coadinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.�DVLP 333 SW First Avenue
Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,Greenspates Coordinalw(CPA's20A's) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946
5alem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946
CITY OF KING CITY METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION
City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY
15300 SW 116th Avenue Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.oi Land Use&Trans.
King City,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,Plenninp 155 N.First Avenue
3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124
Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration
PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 ODOT,REGION 1 Brent Curtis tcPa,S�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen,DNprt�.Rev.Coord. SCOt�KIIl9(CPA's)
Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Mike Borreson ce�i�een
CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Tice ncn5�
David Knowles,Pannmq eureau oir OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Tom Harry�a�m v�.A�:.�
Portland Building 106,Rm.1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy�c�Re��a� nccs.�
1120 SW Fifth Avenue PoRland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist
Portland,OR 97204 PO Box 25412
Portland,OR 97298-0412
UflLITY PROYIDERS AND SPECIAL AGEMCIES
BURLINGTON NORTHERN R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.(R/R) _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Administrative Office Jason Hewitt Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Michael Kiser,Project Planner
1313 W.11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street
Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97232
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886
COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Craig Eyestone NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Linda Peterson Pete Nelson
14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street
Beaverton,OR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204
Portland,OR 97209-3991
GENERALTELEPHONE
Paul Koft,Engineering PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
MC: OR030546 Brian Moore
Tigard,OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road
Beaverton,OR 97007 h:lpaltyVnastersVicnotice mst 2-May-97
C�I,P 9�—G�.S R'7r�T Nt p/YO�I�'Tbr.vt�i� C Pc�, 1 a�2�
2si aza,e-o22oo zsi oz,ac-oo2o�
CACH,GERALD C JOAN L CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES 8
12525 SW MAIN HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATES ET AL
TIGARD,OR 97223 BY GUARDIAN MGMT ATTN:BARRY B
PO BOX 5886
PORTLAND,OR 97228
2S102AC-00900 2S102AC-00700
DAVIS,EUGENE L 8 VIVIAN M DOLAN&CO LLC
10875 SW 89TH AVE BY FLORENCE T DOLAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 4025 SE BROOKLYN
PORTLAND,OR 97202
2S102A6-D2000 2S102AB-021 DO
FINKE,ALEX AND LOTTI AND FINKE,ALEX AND L
HANS CHRISTIAN HANS CHRI
PO BOX 23562 PO B
TIGARD,OR 97223 , R 97223
2S102AC-01101 2S102AB-02300
HAMMOND,DAVID E&CHRISTINE N HANSON,DONALD E
3015 SW 116TH SHIRLEY
BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PO BOX 12
WELCHES,OR 97067
2S 102AC-00800 2S 102AC-01000
HEWELHORST,MICHAEL J HOFFARBER,RAY A
Go KADEY,GEORGE S JR 12005 SW HALL BLVD
12551 SW MAIN ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
25102AC-01100 2S102AC-D0200
SORG,OTTO STEVENS,PAGE N
BY FIRST INTERSTATE BANK 9180 SW BURNHAM ROAD
TRUST REAL ESTATE T-12 TIGARD,OR 97223
PO BOX 2971
PORTLAND,OR 97208
2S102AC-00204 2S102AC-00203
TIGARD,CITY TIGARD,CI
13125 ALL 13125 LL BLVD
RD,OR 97223 D,OR 97223
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES MIKE BIRNDORF, PROJECT MANAGER
1600 SW FOURTH AVENUE W&H PACIFIC
PORTLAND OR 97201 8405 SW NIMBUS AVENUE
BEAVERTON OR 97008-7120
i S�C� �
I q,�ST OQ-
I
� ����<✓
�
�
�
I � �
, � �
� �
ST �
I ST �
�,� � �.L
- �
u,�,�
�s, �
�s �„o, �'ti,�i
�
�s, „� �s,� �
�
.�
�� ��,� �
�
!, �
i ,s,�, �
�
�
�
�
.�
� �
', c� 4�
O
� � ^
��
■�
'� U
�, . ����
� uiciniri Map CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003
._..__ N
Notification Area Map
CC3NDITlONAL USE APPL[CAT14N
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Trgard, OR 9i223 (503) 639-4i71 FAX.' (503) 684-,'297
CiTY OF TIGARD
PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ��3 �
GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: �
Property Address/Location(s): 12562 SW Main Street FOR STAFF USE ONLY
- � ,-
Tigard, OR �r1C l'� ��i.�, �,"r�'>ti:�
Case No.(s):
Tax Map 8� Tax Lot#(s): T2S-RlW-102AC 1101 Other Case No.(s): �.��'� � ����'�' �
Receipt No.: �1 �'� 3 '�-�=�, �.`���
Site Size: �63 Acres Application Accepted By: ����`
, �� -�� �
Property Owner/Deed Holder(5)': David & Christine Hammond
Date: �'���" r ' ? � �
Address: 3015 SW 116th Ave. Phone:
City: Beaverton, ox Zip: 97005 Date De 'ned To Be Compiete:
Applicant': AT&T Wireless Services Att: Real Estate Mer. � g �
(w+,+ PA��r��) Comp PIan/Z ne Designation:
Address: 1600 SW 4th Ave. Phone: ��Z6-0�.�5
�r3� G II�(�
City: Portland, OR Zip; 97201 --r
Rep: Mi Ke Birnalor�W&H Pacific, 8405 SW Nimbus, Beavert ��TArea: �a'��
'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant
must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Re�.ansrs� e`�,�"v�st�`aa.do�
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)
must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this
form or submit a written authorization with this application.
PROPOSALSUMMARY
The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional R�Q�IIRED SUBMITTA� ELEMENTS
Use approval to allow (please be specific): construct a 50' tall
monopole and equipment building for cellular � Application Elements Submitted:
communications. [� AppliCation Form
[� Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
p' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed
p� Site/Plot Plan (8'h°x 11")
(#of copies based on pre-app Check list)
[� Applicant's Statement
(#of copies based on pre-app check list)
[�' Filing Fee 51,615.00
�-} 1 G ct.oo FQ f v�•J�,,�
1
List any VARIANCE, SENS(TIVE L�4NDS PERMf7, OR OTHER LAND U5E ACTIONS to be considered as part of this
application:
�/A.e/A�11C� TD I'�d�� f��'CF S S /3FG�
C0�✓v�`r i e�A t- J.r'F F0�2 c/S"E
APPLICANTS:
To consider an apptication complete, you will need to submit ALL of the �Q�11RED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box.
(Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• The above reauest does not violate anv deed restrictions that may be attached to or imaosed upon the subject
�Opertv_•
• If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all
the conditions and limitations of the approval.
• All of the above s�atements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;
and the applicants so acknowledqe that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that
any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and unders;ands tt�e
requirements for approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this day of . 19
See attached — Owner authorization
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature Owne�s Signature
2
. �
CITY OF TIGARD
Community;UeveCopme�et
SFutpingA Better Community
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUPI 91-0005
VARIANCE[VARI 97-0003
FILE TITLE: AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER
APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond
1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue
Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005
REPRESENTATIVE:Mike Birndorf, Project Manager
W& H Pacific
8405 SW Nimbus Avenue
Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 (503) 626-0455
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications
monopole tower and related equipment structure. A Variance has also been
requested to the development standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area.
LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101.
ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated,
central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density
residential, and mixed uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134.
CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
PHONE NUMBER: (503)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECISION MAKING BODY
DATE COMMENTS DUE: MOIIdBY-�une2,1991
STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION:
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 7/14/97 TIME: 7:00
CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE X
X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER _
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Plannina Division (�� 639-4171 x31 7
CUP 97-0005 AT 8 T MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Conditional Use Permit Application for
the Downtown Tigard Cellular Site
;
A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard
Prepared for
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
1600 SW 4th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97201
Prepared by
W&H Pacific
8405 SW Nimbus Avenue
Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7120
April 17, 1997
Table of Contents
I. PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Background on Cellular Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Proposed Cellular Facility: Responding to Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
V. RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA . . . . . . 3
Compliance with Community Development Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Site Development Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
VL RESPONSE T4 CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
VII. RESPONSE TO VARIANCE CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
RF Design/Collocation Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Neighborhood Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
IX. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
X. EXHIBITS
A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report
B. Site Plans/Elevations& Survey
C. Wetlands Biologist Report
D. Neighborhood Meeting Notes
XI. ATTACHMENTS
A. Owner Authorization
B. Title Transfer Instrument
C. Pre-Application Conference Notes
D. Photograph of a Similar Installation
i
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditionll Use Permit Appli�ation
I. PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION
File No: 1708-1115
Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services
1600 SW 4th Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97201
Preparer for Applicant: Michael Birndorf
W&H Pacific, Inc.
8405 SW Nimbus Ave
Beaverton, Oregon 97008
(503) 626-0455
Property Owner: David and Christine Hammond
3015 SW 116th Avenue
Beaverton, OR. 97005
Request: 50-foot tall monopole with flush mounted antennas
and a 12' by 28' equipment shelter
Location: 12562 SW Main Street
Legal Description: T2S-R1W-102AC 1101
Zoning: Central Business District (CBD)
W&N Pacific, Inc. Apri!17, 1997
1
AT&T Wireless Services- Downtown Tig:�i�d
Conditional Use Permit Application
II. INTRODUCTION
AT&T Wireless Services is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to install a cellular facility
consisting of a 50-foot tall slim-line monopole and three flush-mounted panel antennas at 12562 S.W.
Main Street in Tigard. There will also be a small equipment shelter placed adjacent to the monopole.
The applicant is also requesting a variance to tlie paved access requirement.
Backeround on Cellular Communications
AT&T Wireless Services is one of the original licensees authorized by the Federal Communications
Commission to provide cellular service to the Portland Metropolitan Area. In order to provide this
service, a region is split up into smaller geographic areas called cells. Cells are cellular signal
coverage areas. Each cell is served by a cellular facility consisting of transmitting and receiving
antennas mounted to a monopole or other suitable structure and an associated shelter containing radio
equipment. As a cellular user moves across the landscape, his or her call is passed or"handed-off'
from one cellular facility to another. Each facility is connected to a mobile switching center, which
provides connections to the land based phone network serving your home or office. When an
individual cellular facility reaches its maximum capacity, in terms of the number of simultaneous calls
it can handle, the cell is broken down into smaller cells and one or more additional cells is created.
The resulting cellular facilities typically operate with less power and at lower antenna heights.
Cellular facility site locations are determined after a detailed analysis by radio frequency engineers.
Site selection criteria include: surrounding topography, distance from other cellular facilities,
proximity to traffic corridors and population centers or heavy usage areas, and other technical factors.
Cornputer modeling and radio testing are also conducted to determine potential sites.
Proposed Cellular Facility� Res o�ndin�to Demand
The AT&T cellular network is a mature system, having been in operation for nearly 12 years.
Consequently, new cellular facilities are being developed and others are being optimized in an effort
to enhance coverage, increase capacity, and improve overall system ef�iciency. New cellular facilities
are added to a given area "sized" to accommodate local area needs. As a result, new facilities in
heavy usage areas, such as Tigarci, are designed to provide coverage to small, targeted geographic
areas. This limits flexibility in site selection.
The proposed cellular facility location on Main Street is designed to enhance cellular coverage in
Tigard including downtown Tigard and portions of Pacific Highway and surrounding neighbc,rhoods.
This facility will connect to other neighboring facilities on Pacific Highway at Watkins Avenae
(proposed), King City and at Pfaf�le Road in Tigard (E�chibit A). Besides enhancing cellular coverage
in these areas, the proposed facility will also greatly increase capacity in this high call volume area.
W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997
2
AT&T Wireless Services- Downtown Tiglyd
Conditional Use Permit Ap�lication
III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed transmitter/antenna site consists of a 50-foot tall gaivanized steel monopole and an
equipment shelter containing radio equipment. The monopole will be outfitted with three panel
antennas measuring approximately eight feet long and twelve inches wide. Each antenna will be flush
mounted on the sides monopole. The equipment shelter measures approximately twenty-eight feet
long, twelve feet wide and ten feet tall and has an exposed earth-tone aggregate finish. The entire
facility will be surrounded by landscapin� equivalent to 15% of the total leased area. The
landscaping will consist of a continuous evergreen hedge that will provide screening of the equipment
areas and the monopole base from surrounding properties.
Site Descri tn ion
The lease area is accessed via Main Street along the east side of an existing building on the property.
The lease area is located in the south-west portion of the approximately .63 acre subject property,
in an area that is presently covered with gravel (Exhibit B). Existing development on the property
includes a commercial building. The leased area is located behind this commercial building in a
storage yard. The commercial building is presently used as a retail paint store. All development will
occur outside the 25 foot buffer from Fanno Creek, located east of the proposed lease area. Other
adjacent uses include commercial developments along Main Street to north and west of the subject
property and to the east across Fanno Creek. The property to the south is presently undeveloped.
Further south and west of the subject property are multi-family residential developments.
IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS
The applicant, AT&T Wireless Services, is requesting Conditional Use approval to develop a utility
facility pursuant to Section 18.13 of the Ti�ard Development Code and a variance to the paved access
requirement pursuant to Section 18.124.050.
V. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA
The following paragraphs are a response to the applicable development review criteria.
Compliance with Community Develo�ment Code
18.66.CBD: Central Busrr�ess District
18.GG.0�10 Conditional Uses
A. Conditional uses in the CBD distrrct are as follows:
W&H Pacifrc, Inc. Apri!17, 1997
3
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigai•d
Conditional Use Permit Application
4. Utilities
Response:
The applicant is requesting permission to construct a 50-foot tall monopole and associated
eyuipment shelter for cellular communications. This use is classified as a utility pursuant to
Section 18.42 and is allowed as a conditional use.
18.66.050 Dimensional Requirements: Nor�reside�rtial Uses
A. Dimensional requirements for non-residentral uses in ihe CBD district are as follows:
1. There is no mininrum lot area reyuired.
2. There are rro mirumum lot width reqrri�•ements.
3. Except as othenvise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, there are no
setback requirements, excep130 feet where a commercial use within the district abuts
a resrdentral zonrng district.
Response:
The subject property does not abut a residential zoning district and the proposed facility is not
a commercial use. Therefore, there are no setback requirements.
4. Except as otherwise provided i�z Chapter 18.98, no building in a CBD zone shall
exceed 80 feet.
S. The maximum height of any buildrng in the CBD zone withrn 100 feet of any
residenlial zoning district shall�rat ezceed 40 feet.
Response:
The proposed cellular comrnunications facility is not intended for human habitation and is,
therefore, exempt from the height limitltion per Section 18.98.010.
6. Maximum site coverage shall be 85 perce�rt including all buildings and impervious
surfaces; and
Response:
The total site coverage, with the addition of the cellular facility, will not exceed maximum site
coverage rec�uirements.
7. The mrnimrim landscaping requireme�tt shall be l.i percent.
W&N Pacifrc, lnc. April 17, 1997
4
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Applic�tion
Response:
The proposed lease area will be surrounded by landscaping materials consisting of an
evergreen hedge planted around the equipment building. The total landscaped area will be
equivalent to 15% of the leased area. Therefore, the landscaping standard is met.
18.96 Additional yard setback requiremenis a�zd exceptions.
18.96.020 Additional Setback from Ce�tterline Required.
18.96.020
2. Collector Streets:
a. The required setback distcrnce for buildings on the following collector streets
is ihe setback distance required by ihe zoning district plus the followirrg
drstances measured from the cef7terline of ihe street.
Response:
A setback of 30 feet from the centerline of Main Street is required. The proposed cellular
facility will be located greater than 200 feet from the centerline of Main Street. This far
exceeds the special setback requirement.
18.100.030 Street Trees
A. All development projecis fronting on a pteblic,private street, or a private driveway more than
100 feet in length...
Response:
The proposed cellular communications facility development will occur behind an existing
building with a developed street frontage. No street trees are proposed as part of this
conditional use application.
18.100.I10 Screening Special Provisions
A. Screening: Special Provisions.
1. Screenrng of parki�rg and loadirrg areas is rec�r�rred...
W&11 Pacific,lnc. Apri!!7, 1997
5
i
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tig�rd
Conditional Use Permit Application
Response:
The applicant is not proposing to develo�� parking in conjunction with this use. The proposed
communication facility is unstaffed. Infrequent maintenance visits will use existing parking
areas on the premises. As a result, and as noted by staff in the pre-application conference, the
listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable.
18.102. visual Clearance Areas
18.IO2.020 Visual Cleara�rce: Requir•ed.
A. Except withrn the CBD zoning district a vis7ral clearance area shall be maintained on the
cor��ers of all property adjacent to the irrtc�rsection of t�vo streets, a street and a railroad, or
a driveway providirrg access to a parblic or private street.
Response:
The proposed facility will be located in a CBD zoning district. Therefore, this standard is not
applicable.
18.106.030 Minimum Off-Street Parking Reqrrirements
Response:
There is no minimum off-street parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such
as the proposed cellular communications facility. Infreyuent maintenance visits will use
existing parking located at the premises.
18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation
18.108.080 Minimum Reqr�irements: Commercial arrd Irrdristrial Use
A. Vehicle acce�ss, egress and circulation for commercial and indusirial use shall not
be less than the following(See Appendrx, Fr��re 19):
Response:
This proposed use does not require that parking spaces be provided, therefore, two-way
access is also not needed to serve this facility. No specific access width is required for this
use. The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement that access to the site be paved,
as described in Section VII of this report. The proposed facility location appears to meet
Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue emergency vehicle access requirements, per a conversation
with Jerry Renfro, Deputy Fire Marshall.
WBcN Pacrfic,lnc. Apri!17, 1997
6
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Apptic�tion
Site Develo�ment Review
Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that the development proposal be consistent with the various
standards of the Community Development Code. The following are site development review
approval standards applicable to the proposed cellular facility.
18.120.180 Approval Standards
2. Relationship to the Natzrral and Physical Environment
a. Buildings shall be:
(I) Located to presen�e existing trees, topography, and naiural drainage;
(ri) Located in areas rrot sarbject to ground slumping or sliding;
(rii) Located to provide adeqarate distance between adjoining buildings for
adequate light, air circulation, and fire fightrng; and
(iv) Oriented wfth co�rsideration for sun and wind; and
b. Trees having a six irich caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by
new plantirrgs of equal character.
Response:
The proposed facility will be located on a property that is developed with a commercial use.
The facility will be situated within an existing gravel storage yard compound. No trees will
be removed as part of the development, nor will the topography be altered or the natural
drainage be changed as a result of this development proposal. The site is on flat ground in
a well drained area that is outside of the 25 foot buffer area adjacent to Fanno Creek. The
proposed site area does not contain wetland hydrology (Exhibit C). The site location, at an
elevation of approximately 152 feet (AMSL), is also outside of the 100 year flood plain,
which at this location is between l48 and 149 feet (AMSL).
The design of the facility will take into account the ground conditions as part of the
foundation design for the monopole. The monopole is slender and is approximately 2 feet
wide. Consequently, it will not impair light or air circulation nor will it create an impediment
for fire fighting.
4. Buffc�ring, Screening, and Conrpatibility between Adjoini�7g Uses:
a. Bufferrrlg shall be providc�d betweer7 different types of land uses...
W&N Pacifrc, Inc. April 17, 1997
7
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Applic�ttion
Response:
A mixture of plant materials to screen the facility will be provided around the base of the
monopole and associated equipment shelter. The existing commercial building will also
screen approximately half of the 50-foot tall monopole structure as viewed from Main Street.
However, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line
of sight to the antennae structure.
The proposed 50-foot tall monopole structure, with flush mounted antennas is similar in
design to many parking lot light standards. Consequently, it is far less obtrusive than the
power poles and associated transmission lines that e�cist throughout the area. Furthermore,
the building height requirement for non-utility structures in the CBD zone is 80 feet. The
monopole structure is proposed to be 30 feet below what the district allows for commercial
buildings, which are permitted outright.
b. On site screerring fronr view from adjoining propertres of such thrngs as
service areas. . .
Response:
The ground mounted equipment building will be screened through the use of landscape
plantings around the proposed lease area.
10. Crime Pi•evention and Safety:
d. The exterior lrghtirrg levels be selected and angles be orietrted towards...
Response:
The proposed communication facility will be located adjacent to an e�cisting building, in a
fenced area away from pedestrian circulation areas. No new lighting is proposed.
14. Landscaping
a. All landscaping shall be designed ir� accordance with the requirements set
forth in Chapter 18.100.
b. In additron to ihe operi space ar�d recreation area requirenze�rts of subsections
S aru�G above, a minimrrm of 20 percerrt of the gross area iricluding parking,
loadrr7g a»d service areas shal!be landscaped; and
c. A minimum of IS perce�rt cf the��oss srte area shall be la�ldscaped;
W&11 Pacific,Inc. Apri117, 1997
8
AT&T Wireless Services- Downtown Tigard
Condition�l Use Permit Applic�tion
Response:
The proposed communication facility will be landscaped in accordance with the requirements
of Chapter 18.100. Plantings will be provided along the perimeter of the lease area which will
surround the facility. The type of plantings used will be drought resistant and, therefore, will
not require the use of an in-ground imgation system. A minimum of 15% of the leased area
will be landscaped. No new parking, loading or service areas are prc�osed.
VI. RESPONSE TO CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
The following paragraphs will respond to the conditional use criteria contained in Section 18.130.040
of the Zoning Ordinance as well as some of the other i�if'ormation reguested during the pre-application
conference.
18.130 Conditiorral Use
18.130.040 Approval Standards a��d Condilians.
A. The hearings offrcer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a
conditronal use or to enlarge or alter a co�zditrorral use...
1. The site size and dime�lsioris provide adequate area for ihe needs of ihe proposed
t�se;
Response:
The site size and dimensions are adequate for the proposed use. The site will occupy only
a small fraction, less than 4%, of the 27,500 square foot subject property. The proposed
facility will be located in a fenced gravel storage yard. The proposal is consistent with the
CBD district and meets all dimensional requirements.
2. The characleristics of the sile are sr�itable fnr the proposed use considerirrg size,
shape, location, topography, arrd��atural featrires.
Response:
The characteristics of the subject property are suitable for the proposed facility for several
reasons. The size of the subject parcel is large enough to accommodate the existing
structures as well as the proposed facility. The proposed leasehold area is on a flat area that
is outside of the 25 foot buffer area adjacent to Fanno Creek and is outside the flood-plain.
The small leased area rec�uires no significant grading to develop the site. In addition, the
existing building will partially screen approximately half of the monopole structure as viewed
from Main Street.
W&1J Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997
9
AT&T Wireless Services- Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Application
Another strength ofthis site location is its proximity to commercial areas and transportation
corridors in Tigard. This proposed facility will help to better link telecommunications
between King City and the Highway 217 corridor. The elevation of the site allows the radio
signal to have ma�cimum coverage, and helps to limit "blind spots" created by ridge lines.
3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal.
Response:
The applicant is not requesting that any new public facilities be made available to serve the
development as proposed. Power and telephone service are readily available to serve the
proposed facility. The installation will not require any water or sewer, or any other public
services. The facility is unstaffed. Therefore, there will be virtually no traffic generated from
the facility.
4. 7�ie applicable requiremerrts of the zoning distrrct are met except as modifred by this
chapter.
Response:
All applicable requirements of the zoning district are met with the exception of the paved
access requirement. A request to vary from this requirement is addressed in this application.
S. The s7ipplementary requireme�rts set forth irr Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section
18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met.
Response:
No signs will be provided. As demonstrated in Section V., this proposal complies with the
applicable approval standards of Section 18.120.180.
6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of ihe Comprehensive Plan.
Response:
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged and Community Development Codes
have been adopted to implement it. Applicable Community Development Code approval
criteria have been addressed. Comprehensive Plan Section VIII (B) under Public Facilities
and Services (Private Facilities/Communication) does not address cellular communications.
Goal 12 Locational Criteria [Section 12.4.1.A. (1) and (2)]/Minor Impact Utilities and
Facilities are applicable to this proposal. The proposed site location will allow AT&T
Wireless Services to provide enhanced cellular coverage along portions of Pacific Highway,
downtown Tigard and surrounding neighborhoods. The facility will also allow for added call
W&H Pacific,lnc. Apri!17, 1997
10
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Condition�l Use Permit Application
capacity in this high call volume area. AT&T is authorized by the Federal Communications
Commission to provide cellular service to the City of Tigard.
There are no visual, traffic, safety, or noise impacts, which would limit or impair use of
surrounding properties associated with the proposed cellular facility. The development of
this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements
that are planned. The facility is unstaffed. After construction, there will be a once or twice
monthly visit by a service technician to ensure that the equipment is functioning properly. The
appearance of the 50-foot tall slim-line monopole structure is similar in design to many types
of parking lot light standards and is less obtrusive than existing power poles and associated
transmission lines in the area. In addition, the antennas will be flush mounted on the sides of
the monopole to further minimize visual impact.
VII. RESPONSE TO VARIANCE CRITCRIA
The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement that all areas for vehicle maneuvering be
paved with an asphalt or concrete surface, pursuant to Section 18.106.050(J). The existing access
driveway surface from Main Street is paved up until within 90 feet of the site location and then the
access material is a combination of gravel ancl/or bare soil up to the site. Paved access all the way
back to the site, behind the existing building, cannot be provided because no paving can occur within
25 feet of Fanno Creek, pursuant to Unified Sewerage (USA) and City of Tigard standards for
protecting sensitive lands. As demonstrated in the attached survey and site plans (Exhibit B), the
buffer area consumes the entire area that is necessary for vehicle access to the proposed site.
Consequently, the unique features of the property, which are outside of the applicant's control, make
it impossible to meet the paving requirement.
In addition, the proposed antenna/transmitter facility is unstaffed. Only periodic maintenance
inspections are required to insure that the electronic equipment is functioning properly. Based on the
applicant's system wide average,these visits occur twice a month. As a result, the access path to the
site would be used infrequently, therefore, paving it is unnecessary.
18.134. Yarrance.
18.134.010 Purpose
A. The p��rpose of this chapter is to provide standards for granting of variances from ihe
applicable zoni��g reqrrirements of this tille ivhere ii ca�r be shown that, owi��g to special and
u�rusual circ7rmstances related to a specific piece of the� la��d, ihe Irteral ifrterpretation of the
provisions of the applicable zottr�lg code worrld cause arr undue or unnecessary hardship....
W&H Pacific, Inc. Apri!17, 1997
11
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Applic�tion
18.139.O50 Criteria for Granting a Yarrance
A. The Director shall crpprove, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance
based on finding that the followirrg criteria are satisfied.•
l. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title,
be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable
policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or
vicinity;
Response:
The purpose of the title, as outlined in Chapter l 8.02.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code, are:
As a means of promoting the gerreral health, safety and welfare of the public,
ihis title is designed to set forth the standards and procedures governing the
development and use of land in Tigard and to implement the Tigard
comprehensive plan.
The proposed pavement material variance is limited in nature and is not harmful to the title's
purpose of promoting the health, safety and welfare for the citizen's of Tigard. There are no
other applicable policies or standards that would be conflict with this variance. The proposed
non-paved access meets emergency vehicle access requirements. According to Jerry Renfro,
Deputy Fire Marshall, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, all weather access road surfacing is
only rec�uired up to within 150 feet of t}iis unstaffed facility. All portions of the facility will
be within 150 feet of the end of the existing all weather surfaced (paved) driveway(Exhibit
Fs). Granting the variance would not limit or impair the orderly development and use of other
properties in the district or vicinity.
2. That there are sPecial circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or
shape, topography or other circ:rmstances over which the applicant has no control,
and which are not applrcable to other praperties in the same zoning district.
Response:
The need for the variar:ce from the Code's requirement to pave the access arises from special
circumstances of this lot of which the applicant has no control. Specifically, Fanno Creek,
and the associated 25 foot buffer adjacent to the creek, comprise approximately 17,270
square feet of the 27,500 square foot subject property or 63% of the total parcel area. The
presence of the creek is the dominant feature of this small odd shaped parcel. This is a special
circumstance that exists which arises from conditions inherent in the land which distinguish
it from other land in the same zone.
W&H Pacific,lnc. Apri!17, 1997
12
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Application
3. The use proposed wrll be the same as permitted under this title and City Standards will be
maintained to the greatest exteni that is reasorrably possible while permitting some economrc
use of the land;
Response:
All City Code criteria are met with this proposal except the requirement that access be paved.
The pavement requirement is met to the greatest extent possible. Only 90 feet of the 190 foot
access length needed to the site will go unpaved with the variance. The City Code does not
define what should be included in the meaning of"some economic use" of the land. The
pavement regulation is not an exaction of private property for public use and does not impose
a condition on the use of the property in an individualized, discretionary land use decision.
Rather, the paving requirement was a le�islative policy choice of the City Council enacted in
the City Code and applicable to all accesses. The City also made a policy choice to require
a buffer along the bank of Fanno Creek in order to protect the stream from the impacts of
development. This proposal is consistent with that policy choice.
4. Existing physrcal cmd natural systems, srrch as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic
land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the
development were located as specified in the title; and
Response:
An unpaved access surface will have less impact on existing physical and natural systems than
if a paved access surFace were provided. This request reduces paved surfaces where they are
not needed. Paved surfaces prevent water from percolating into the ground, thereby
increasing storm water run-off. Run-off from impervious surfaces contributes to flooding and
increases the risk of pollution or contamination of lakes and streams, such as Fanno Creek.
Therefore, granting this variance will help protect existing physical and natural systems.
S. The hardship is not self-im�osed and the variance requested is the minimum which
would allevrate the hardship.
Response:
The applicant's inability to pave a portion of the access to the site is a hardship that is not
self-imposed. The uniqueness of the land, namely the dominating presence of Fanno Creek,
and the buffer requirement for development along its bank, make it impossible to provide the
rec�uired paved access up to the site. Relocating the facility on the property was considered;
however,there is no other location on the property, outside the 25 foot buffer, where the site
could be located given the physical space and access requirements of the facility. As stated
above, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. Greater than
half of the access to the site is already paved.
W&H Pacrfrc, Inc. Apri117, 1997
13
AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard
Conditional Use Permit Applicltion
VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
RF Design/Collocation Issues
At the pre-application conference held on February 6th, staff requested that the applicant provide an
en�ineering report documenting the need for the facility at the proposed location. This information
is included as part of Exhibit A.
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was held on March 17th to discuss the proposed facility with surrounding
property owners. Other than the applicant, no one else attended the meeting (Exhibit D).
IX. CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, the applicant rec�uests approval of the proposed
conditional use permit and variance application. These applications meet all applicable criteria for
approval.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report
B. Site Plans/Elevations & Survey
C. Wetlands Biologist Report
D. Neighborhood Meeting Notes
1:lprojectV 7081!161 wpdatalS3b.app
W&N Pacific,Inc. Apri1!7, 1997
14
EXHIBIT A
Radio Frequency Engineering Report
�
0
AT�T
1I
AT&T Wireless Services
1600 5W 4th Avenue
Portland,OR 97201
O�ce (503)306-7484
FAX (503)306-7486
March 20, 1997
City of Tigard
Planning Department
Tigard, OR
RE: Proposed cellular telecommunications site-Tigard DT site
Our Engineers have studied this site extensively and have concluded that this location is the only
viable site that will meet our engineering needs and requirements. The studies for this area
included computer modeling and actual testing of the sites to determine coverage, technical
acceptability and suitability of the site. Whenever possible, we also conducted models or tests of
alternate sites for collocation or joint construction. We have found no acceptable alternative to
the site we have applied for.
I have attached a statement and exhibits prepared by Matt Harkins, RF Engineer for this location.
His statement and the "plots" clearly demonstrate the need for this communications facility,
coverage of the proposed site, and unacceptability of collocation on the Sprint site.
We have purposely designed this facifity to be low impact by using a 50' monopole and "slim line"
antenna design. The slim line design allows us to close mount the antennas against the pole in a
vertical fashion to minimize visual impact. Samples of this type of mount are enclosed.
Please contact me at the phone number above if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
Ron Fowler, Real Estate Manager
�� Recycled Paper
Tigard DT Site Objectives:
This site's main objective is to provide additional capacity for the downtown Tigard area
including 99W. The majority of cellular traffic is generated from congestion on 99W.
This highway and a large portion of Tigard are currently served by a single site located on
Pfaffle street, north on I-217. While the Pfaffle site is providing relatively good coverage
to downtown Tigard, it is heavily loaded and serves an extremely large area. The
proposed downtown Tigard site must provide additional capacity for the area without
causing excess interference, which degrades system quality, and with minimal visual
impact.
In order to accomplish this objective, the site selected to provide coverage for this area
must be located close enough to 99W and Main Street that it will provide signal levels
greater than the existing service to the target area without causing excess interference to
surrounding sites.
Propagation predictions for the two proposed sites are attached to this document. It
should be noted that these predictions do not consider the effect of physical obstructions
such as buildings and trees on the radio frequency(RF) signals. When comparing the two
plots, it can be seen that although the Hall Blvd. site provides some coverage along 99W,
this coverage is not strong enough to exceed the signal levels already existing from the
Pfaffle St. s.:e,and thus will not provide the required capacity offload. As previously
mentioned, these plots also do not show the degradation of signal levels on Main Street
due to the obstruction of`line of site' coverage that will be experienced by the Hall Blvd.
site.
Therefor, the Hall Blvd. site will not meet the required objectives for the downtown
Tigard site.
Matt Hazkins
RF Design Engineer
�� , , � l � `� ,,, �� ... .,�� . , i., :,_• _� � .,, { __
-��'I�"' /-� �l4iTls0 r � $� r6!'�.'� `__ !_ 3vi •r 1 - -�.'
o•_. F�'�•_ - � � "7 � �n - �' � .-- �
u ,� � ,-7<„ � � ���t`=�>� -�'�-�" --� �.-� _ ���
_ -- . i i, � r�.'-,., - _ _-� :��;. .�. :,J e e �,
, �� , _ , �. _ �, •.•�� �, '
�'', _, �ii i _ .�. �� ,�3� --•- ,?� . ��Mp�,-Kp: '��- _ ATd�( tfirc'.:ss Services
��z�--����� i �, ,�� 52 ,ss _ � ° � Orego�Cover
""�`�a ,� - ,. � ' ; ,`� � � � . Siynal age Plot
o� \ � . \ � ;\ -'a� .� _�is,r y _ CeIICAD II v2.4
, ,�.�, � �� � ' • � . � �� ��. � �� �• � - -
tH��eoDn���� i.. _��.�_ ,��. � u 6 f.� �4�,-----� ,I LJ� `_
,, +� n �� �-� 1 �_ _� _ � »- ' - Tigard OT Alternate (AAA�
�_'-=--� � � � - - oa :\}" �� � / � �� _ �. ��� .5r- � � H-MH48-000
�,� � � \ - �, �� � Q� _ ,�. �. ' � HYpothetcl
.� � .,�: ::��� �� r � � : rec�bu ! ' �-✓ Y 1 AA
t �� ti, _ A �g� - � --- � ':�� t. ' Y2 AB
o .�- Gt n � t� � ;�t '' P • V3 AC
� .. .... . � _ � 1 ,�1`� . �� ' '•I� �1�, I�_� �Fni. E� 1T
��' �"`:�-.'��. � � ri �� _ -� �� � `'t� �' �,� ' ��t •;�; �;.',
�•,n,•y ' : _ - - �'� nk �.,, ' :,� i �; t� �, ;er. o,�,' - - PFZ�_����, OktlrpUtq
h. h �� ��.. �•,� \r c 4 ��� (!'� � '. ,. �- "'�,y ;.�;: :�;.r•
�u .. .. �,� - � ti =�� �;�, 1� .; �,.��,> ,� .- -� �, � .IAT . 45-25-37 N
. , --_ ��� .`�., , �ifl I� � _ :�
���:� -,� ' .t_ ;�: �� . '� ��.� � �J. .z -�` � _: __ LON . 122-45-56 W
�f�, �` - � :t - - -�.�;, .. ��:�� � �, � - - � .
� � � • ' � '� GE 148 ft
.�. . . I . = _ -. �. .•r / `;' • /F �l �
��� ���'�.,� � � � � : �r � � r;�,�; ��8� MORPHOLOGY ; N
� �•. '� ,'•� i � � r �'� ��� � ,�,� . �''� �- ���Xr r1,�.�-'�'�� r:I; RADIUS . 25 mi
��� .7��•T - -3�•�. _ `' � Y � , �}�t�,v'i.
i . "�� � , ��- � �yr ..��� � il�
,�� ' . .. � �i�+► t: �S: 1' r .� �.k� t = RADIALS : 360
� ��— TpL�� .o � ^ c�` �y ;� � . �, � .;,.. ,� ,s - DELTA RAD • 0.1000 mi
.;• 'S,�'.,:�;\ �� '��) � -- �_-- �h.�"� �<;" '"'�_ `'��, �� __ __- ANTENNA . 70-12-OONASP .
.�, ` I.a;- ��,=, .�: _!�'_:�� ' '�_ - .
i, - _
.�
y� ;;•�'•�� / - •t - - ORIENTATION . 15 TN
_ ..�;� - - .�-" 'k. L`.:,r�., r � -
I�I.%�° �1���I G/�� ,r or_ - ,��`y - '_ J ''�w�f' ; ti.\ a ���� �e = - .
�,, E� �5.0o w
�/....+I�� �ill• ? �� z;�a`�� ,� �� ��'� !� �za��f� �. __ ---- __ _ TIIT : 0.0 Elec
�i '� �T �_ � --rr'' � - - �r� -��� =- Tx Ht . 45 (t
•i �.-: —'I� � "l '��� � ,:� . ��� ��"` _ ��, -
'r�_- . /� ! / � � � T:�_�: �+ -
' " '�' i /: � •� . �S � •- � ; f �
r • � � � , ��—_ ! ��- . � c o-%/ �� � y ��..t�}��'\ :;v Ni�\•� , ..
� j� �` h� �• � � ••� � �4 ' s. a / �.. x � �� } .
' `�Y��;� ;�y',� _ :i .��,�•.,�, � ��5�,�. �.-�'�_Y�'_� y ,t j �;�� �.������ ` r ��
� vi �� �� ' r �� % .�� � � ,� y,;�z';9d �'��.�� �� �:�. �, ra> �.��w �� � �
:�. ��� � ..._ t '�i2�+�.^:i' ���{£�'�t't�JO� '_`^�- �1.�,� ^l� ���- �.�\yi- :. �� 1
. : ' � � + � n�� � Q�
t� �hDh75 � ^�` u �4'� �6�./!� ii,.� .�"-���' �•J�^S5� '� a�f � � �A�\��: ...'C��' � i
:�t. �'i �em` ��" � �t � �g� ' �'�lj/ �=� /`{,� �����\��'. :t' � \� i
�i.l v ' aac �' ./ 'C�. ,.. �., M�D, R, //� fr� i� :,�1 0 \ i
- :ti f o • � �r � � � '
� �.h ' � • ���� " � � 1`'', • �7 � �. � ��� _ ,
n l, 11 ' f �C � - � �1 � .l
� ��`� ��; 4 � �� 3,�,- _ ' _ ,�� ,,_ �� � � �� � i THRESHOIDS OYERUYS
, w _ �r.� c � (Sig dBm)
� ��,� �, �� ,r� .' , �. , �
�. �,- �.. ,. ;,-- -� . I 1 i t, '_ ;� ), i —�• '��.4.�,,� , � ;:, � >=-65 �� .•at�fe R:i
'ti / ri ' l � I/ a� ' ,� t
- :\ 1(. . �� _ i ''f ` �,' .' • r �,'1•i1� ( .1�. /� ...�'�3���c�Oi,F�7�1 _ , � ' , -�� .�C�e P.00dway
; -� 1 i° � , - '`� • ; )• 11 � Local Roods
� , �� 'c'��• - �, „ `)�`. , -�:' / '� ��� afr'� �-, ; >=-95 •� .3-
�_'�� �� i ��j'- � -'� �W���e ,SNM_ _e�ns � _ 1 ��: � ti� ��- . � _ .. . : . .
� " �, � �� �i� � �� r� � ,
� � � ���� � -- �
.• `�� . I. d '� 3
�- l � h �
y r' � .%,'� ;rt•�v .�' sY I I�" hrr�e_, - - �
//�� ,ir�'� � � � J • � n - �- r Milea
•�j%i !` � H "r�•• r - ;�..' . � ,i �, i \ �Jt � � . .
h .l�� . .I��r .s E �----��+ �:?`�'" � ^ ti I• 0 0.25 0.50 0.75
R�'��'� " • �I � ' ��' - - �• � � - �� `� � � SCAIE: 1:24,000 03/19/97 15:0-
• �,' �J_����:- ( d�r �_-., ,?; : r� ,�� • ,
� -- �L .,. _ ,�„ ., ,, , , \� � ,,�, ,. �,.. .. .,rl . .L�•, , _�; �}�,�-�
� � • ~�`
� � .8
�� �; ,.
\ Ilo � O _'�� , •''S ��\ J W'I _
� o'n C � - . � - ;,., Y'1 0 \ �I ` �?�, . � — —
�
�
\ ic � i`� � � �.` �• .��/ � - �_�
, ; �� U���-��� - :r-:. - r�� '':{' �i�� � _� _ ---- 1/
'�� nij �i - �� �, - � -�'�:+ � ��-� _ �GO 7c. �• ik - AT�T �I� �
• � ' `; , �,� , .� e e�s Serrices
---_ � ��.i J 3 � � � �ti\ --�_ - ". .� �� e ( �►e4ort
, ,,l , �---� _ , 1� o � . • _ ... 'u u-... _ Signal Coreroge Plot
-J 1�1 � ♦ �3 1 ,_ S CeI ICAD II r2.4
�� � ; _ \� -- —�_ . .` . - -r , � �i MetzRr
�� _ . �_ `_`� �� �� ���� � ♦�.} ��c�. �j� .Cc �.: - -
3 , I� , �. � Tigord DT (AAS)
. ; �� `' _ ip < � ' \ i --\ .\ � � ���� �, �J,� --� �r, �, p SYS-95
,.,���i�. . H��eo � � - i. � �-• ��`� ;' r' �. �`s -_,--_/ 1•( _ T SCyrT10Uf
•.: . ,���I, � ,� - e�..� �`,� �_ � � 6 �, �T -. ,I V1 CC
____,�_�'.'_' '� � c�- _ _ � / ' '�1 -, V2 CD
� '=°° `,�;. � � — . � ��; ���"" Q' - --_ - J. - i � � Y3 CE
' ` �_ ': !• i�'� � i ��}�� _ = J� 1
_ ' • ��•_°�`�� � �: s '/a '�� � . �� �
�-� '* � " � ' PROP AiODE� Okumura
� '}v ��p_ `' �.._• _ � rl Il + � � ,Q z� I`/ .�� t �'� �,t ;h:�'�;,Y-+.�o�,��K��b'`.c`���v.'�'�iI'?`�y,.�'�_:ry.
���; , � �� "�s, ���n: ; t� ���� 7r I. �� ' LAT 45 25-45 N
/,. `J �� '' " t � ���` '+ ^ r����:. �;; 'r��:� " � oo LON 122-46-23 ,.
���rt;q, �� � - _ � �� � � �� � � �; �; ,,.•� � � � '
) s.���,, .`, _ ;, ,�i� o`',� ,11���t { � ��i`y��;� % '� ��.�, rs� � c� . �aa rt
V f--� ' ��� ��\: y� G ��-{�,1l��I,M�'1 �y�1����- �' �� ���' \
:��� °, , �i/'-�. � � � ' `7, ��"' "���� r.. 1'�� �-� ��%, . %�z�' _ MORPHOLOGY . N
- %�� ,� ,�a �� ��� R -:��.�`'�ul��,����„��� ;, �«:,r .: : __ RADIUS . 25 mi
•�� '' , I: f� ;_ - �' ��; ��«. .r�,� � :� �; ,; ; .f. � RADIALS . 360
� :, ,
� I / r � I:Cf, � 3 \`• 3 �4 4 ` x;"�"" R� i:�#�� �, � �•Y ��T� � . Q.��� Rll
� � / ' f I�,��• --- �� �Y �: �a�� rt' � r.� �y„_ ;,',, , �; fi �� �"-- \ ; ANTFNNA . 70-12-OONASP
� S � �� '�-+ � �ti �"� % r�°``�:: ' ��'-�� .- t �';tiS' �,` � � =f'� � ORIENTAi ION . 25 TN
�'�• � � ,�` ` - t` �� �f : � , �, ��,� � 4�� t � • :� � -.- .
�; � ;r�- �r� .,a �: _ -ss _ � °� rr � �y �.. ,,_' ` ��, �`•` — ERP 15.00 W
1 ,"U � . °: r1 - - ac ;'i� � �'}.- � � `__ _ � TILT . 0.0 Elec
• � /I. : F +r I � 6
`� �f. . . ;i �i� - t,. .��,,, s l� = ' �f � � \ k' "" �. t-�'� ,,._ Tx �it . 45 tt
�� .,.. � � � F� ,_, � � . � � .. t �x'�- '� ^--� ,�r-
� i{ ��" -�� � '�'x���•--� . -'- -�1-'=-'` �..i �,. d �' �l..s'� . - ���,,^i -
._� •f I.'' �(�/. �`i� ' ✓/ . ��' -t 2" 7�`+✓)�#.Y'.�';rCr� '"�.� M � r � _
D�1�\ ) , �j� • f.-f �� r�i � - ". /��' �� �` •: . �� \ p. ��`��! u� _
�(J` I � /�' � y�J� � � " \,�,,� ; ; � �' �/ ,_-_ _
�� � ���' ���'�� ,� � .-,:_ ��2 '�' �'�/G- � ��� � � •a � �w � � ��-�''� - -
'�` ��� � �i �'t" C�� . :� �- � t � � r z: ���x'� ,�a� '`���� � ��r �-_ - � _ -
�. /
! g\ i. -� ii /I � � Y �' .� _ y � �C �'ti I. . 'a.�'�'-v ���y��-�.���i.:,-� � �` �� � ' ^ -�
�� �� � ��� • �� ���� .� � •�� N .�'�� ���Y� �� ��� �A���� ���V+��A� t��A � �14� _ ! � �, �
� , s ii�� � a�� �'�� , -'� - � � ' j� � ,r '�" � �,� ��� ��H1��,;�a_�����.,�� .,. � � . ��fi ��o� '�, <, �;,�
��- � :� ,
�p0 o r.�\ °�, ; � �, -7 ���50��ti 1�' � .� �L ��� �� ��� ���A.�:p � � �
�1 ;�,•°,�� �i � � � ii:"� .� 2� /��o�} �.�S�f' RUU�£ \ � � �y '`�� , � �C�� ��� ��
� i li ��� , "Y ' ♦ � �- � _ A��
' _ _ "° ,' ;�-r ;r'�1{� �� �.� ;. � -, ' ��1"��;���:i`��`,�, ��,�' .::� ' THRESHOLDS OVERLAI'S
� � � - _ „ ,� ��� �! ;;� -�� _� ��� `�:�� ��{�.�,. '��� ���.\� ��� ,,�� ` (Si d6m\
�_ �� 1 . _ �.i cv _ u� : r J�-. _•/MC�D ._ R _�' 1 .� ' '�`� �\\4f �` .\�� �. °�\ l 9 /
t -,-� x=_ - _ - i i� ,\:� .
' , � ,� ;" . �' ;7 +' �� ;1 " r �� .���;;� 'l�1`��� yi ���U`::�;',� � � >=-65 Intersiate Ro
, '�, � r' /, � �� �L ` � `� �, c, ,�.� � � ,`� 1. >=-75 Stote Roadwa
� f- _ � � ''�, '7� '��1 1\�'��ti`�\,`• .��:, '` , _ -3� Local Roods Y
" � , r '.- � '`- , ,�� �„�� k ==�� Ft` 1�. � >=-95 Co�nty Bcundries
, _;'. - ��'• � / ,.�,`� � _ �
n° li+ :.=��, 1 t ! ,:. t�� k`• '�: 's�rvt -; �A�.: _-�,
�L':.�I' �. r :� ��; . �i _f Ti t1�'�ti i:N V. ._ � u •
�� Y_ Y il� _ -- _ � �� �� �A� � ���� \ •
)� ,�ROA �' � �p 1 � _,��' � t l f y
� � , i' , �����.. �� �� �
�'; ,�; ' ��� � / � �� Miles
� •�J =;�a5� •_ �n � ..�.-- � � .� _ _ � �l � � . .
I\ � _ r � ;� �' a 0 0.25 0.50 0.�
" '/' � \1 '_ '_ W. S1J�CEhi. ,� 7' I • \'V`
�;;� � r;;: ` ' ��' � ' n� ; „� ( 2 ')�° �< SCALE: 1:24,000 03�19�97 15
; �, ,,� :. ,
�i�� �� S �i�i �� •� .��� �--�---: �� �T�,o ��, �y i „ ��� 1
� i �'b���� :�� i.
. .�i�-�' nl 1�;�g , . - ���' � ,�, .. • .. ��' . � � � n � -
n .i ` � � i. ^i• ��':
EXHIBIT B
Site Plans/Elevations & Survey
,i
I
;
- ,
I
1 �� � I��
1�, ��
, ��ti
.
\�, G�.o � ,.�"a I
�
ti�o � �o� I
s�,� 'pT,y� G\��G`� �..,
� /�-q �',P P� ��� ��
�,. '�p s � �P,\ cs ��,
� � � �
c � TI�ARD MAIN STREET CELL SITE
� o ti�,
��\�✓� � ��� ��
kr� � \��,� ��q
�Sr � � s�
o�
s
O �'�� ��.
�� �y
��vr, � �. 5�--���� I i�1��>C:
F � �
,,,Sr �, -p AI. YICINITY MAP
�4i �c� � A2. SITE PLaN
; O � A3. PLaN
'� 4 A4. NORTN Ai�1D �ASt ELEY,4TIONS
d� � a5. C�ETI�RAL NOt�S
� J
J
\� _
�w.� fi �'Ofi�Os�1� 5 I �� �
���
ST
�-
NOR�'N
1 VIC I�l I��' r'i,��
�� r�or ro sca��
o ����
,atart w���.�ss sERY�c�s p mfller - cook
1600 SW dth A1iE. POR7LAND, orz 9��mi ��(� a r C h 1 t e c t s, p.C. - 8.i.e.
DOWN TOWN MAIN ST GELL SItE '°"'". ''' ""� '°"T`�"'°,°"!°°" "!°° '°°� �°'°'_!
I �� � (� �I �1��� 5�� iz56�-� aw MaiN sr �oe �. o.�. a...� �.
ri�ar�, o�c�oN 9'11�4 3/12/9� A1
91223
--- ---- ._._..___ --- ----
. . — � \\ ��
� \
� \
� �
� �
\ �
� \
�O VC \ �
Y��,t.�� \ \
�°�,, � �'i�OJ�C:� S I�"�
ti �
�s�` �ANNO CREEK
��4 �� \
4��� �
�� \ �
4ti , �
`s�` GRAYEL YARD \
` , 1
,\ I
�
�
�+,� � �
s �
_ '�tiG� � , \ �
�tic� ��, � \
� \` �
� \� \ \
� �� � �
` � � � �
,
. ,
NOR�'N
1 5 I�� ��,4�1
�� 1'=3m'
O ���
AT�T u11RELE55 SERvICES 0 miller • cook
1600 SW 4th Av�. PORTLAND, OR 91201 ��n a r c h I t e c t s p
, .C. - e.i.e.
DOUJN TOU,J�I MAIN St CELL SItE '°"-". ''`""�- °°"�"'°• °"'°°" "�°° �°� �«�
��� I I� I� I /� �� G� � 125621 SW MAIN ST Job Mo. �.e. o...,r,9 No.
j,._ I �lf t `� ��GA�,°�� 9�TIfd4 3/12/97 A2
91223
� __—_.__..._ -..,, s�� ,
�/ / � �\\ 'R� •� \ .
8 �
. � ��
��J� / STEEC PU7E �
� OVER ,VANHOLE 6�
, ��� Z�
�. , d�� ,
- � ` � L�tB s` � \
, \ �
.. �\ , -+P�� / •� . � \� : � '
J��./�' � 5�� � / , — GAS � , . .
� ETER �
S�'(� ,� . EL£C� � �,, . � •
/ � �/'d � TELE �IH 1/ETER � .� , .
_ � ` TELE �'•�`�o� � \� . .
� �� R�SFR �B9Z �f \
/ � s'/ � ' '� � \ . ' � �
� � \ � O � .
// � � p � ' \
, � �� '` ''�`'E'.'T �\� �� �\ '
/• � i 8U1L0/NC � �� � ,
. ; � � � " . �\ _ \ . '
-- ' . � � � � -
� ����. � �� ` ; ..\� �. \ REGI�TERED '
� � � � \ PROFESSIONAL
� \ . \ �P��`� � \ LAND SURVEYOR
�� � ' � T8M .XI3 1/2" I.R. ELfV. lS1.14 FT �
� � ROS. 7207 BY N0�'E �283 � ELEV�tTlQN BAS�:D ON B�l 488 M'A. C0. ! � �
:� \ : SNOMS' THI S PROPERTY L 1PE � � '.i � . \ � .
��� ' �� ON THE BU/LDlNG LlNE. �� DATUAI � _ � � ��`�—.�y`�
�
, �� � � �� ,�\� � � OREGON , ,
� �
�`�. , FEBRUARY 3, 1983
, � • � � ' ``� � � \ BRUCE 0. TOWLE �
� •- � SOWTlON USINC FOUND AlOM/LENTS AND DEEDS � ` � � \ 2030 _
� � '� t
. \\�� \�� � ',/t � �uoti�ra�a� -b ` RENEWA � —
\ \ j �; , � \ � L OATE: 6-30 98
� � MEf L I ,� PP �. -
; o
� ��\ � : , � �AlON/TpR . ! ; � � 1 ��.T� 1.s7 �
: � � �
;
� / WELL �' GRAVEL � �� -��/ `
BASIS OF BEARINGS \� � � . 25.oo' ��� /� l
� � � /%� 1 1
8EARINCS ARE BASED AN TNE OREGON fN�RTH STATE � t ?� � • � 1
\ � �.� \
COGn01NATE SYSTE,�. THE INFORAUr1GYV rAS DETER- � �, ;� �
Wl1�"D US1NG G[OB�L P051T�ONrNC SYSrE�u,uEAStaRE- � � �
1(ENTS N!TN LEI CA ,IIADEL 200 R£CE!VERS. THE � .�f�HAC T
� 1° � \
DATA I�RS TRAN.SFORAlE1T TO OR£GON NORrH (NAD 83) � . ' � ' 1 z d. o \
\ • � � �,� � �
MHlCX HAS A TNETA �INGLE OF. I°36'44". � ' � Z
\ �\*\ o � �
8E,41?IfuG OF N 01°36'44" E !S TRUE NORTH.
� , �, � Q, � \ ,
. , \\ - � �9/li\\ ' � � d � . ` \ �,
l/ : \ \
SCALE 1 /, — �30 � \�� rNE FL000 PLA/N AS P+:f�rF/R�l AIAP PANEL 3 �Fy� d. -, •` � \
OF 5. 410276 0003(i i_f. ECT I VE AlARCH l, 1982 �'F `�� �
- 3� —I S � 30 6D �� SNOIIS THE FL000 ELf-V.{i ION A� THlS SlTE FRDd! � �; j� � .
� 148.00 FEEl TO l49.G) �EET. - \� ` �
f_-- - \ o �`,.� �
� � d � AIONI TA4 � .
�•.� \� MEL t.- /
\ ' 10" ' � �
� : /° 30' TALC
\
[c1 DEC 1 D(JO(1S � - � dofo/60W 6070/6077 PIAM
/ LAND SURVE-YORS SURVEY FC�R:: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES �srcn► sea� r� - 3o• S"�
� ENGINEERS 1-360-695-1.3�5 DOWNTOWN TIGARD S/TE , �
1-503-289-993b SECTlON 2, T2S, R 1 W, W.M. TL 1 1 p 1 o�u"'" "sR cu�- .�/9' � .
EIVGINL�ERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY VANCOUVER, WA 98660 WASHtNGTON COUNTY, OREGON CNECK£D eor JOBNO. 6077 2
a�
�
._ ,; __ ! .___
������� �o�r�s:
i. VERI�Y AND GONFIRM ALL DIMENSIDNS AND CONDITIONS SNOU�1 OR 13. BACk.�ILL MATERIAL TD B� SELEC7�D NATUR4L FILL MAT�RIAL FROM ON
IMPLIED ON TNE DR�4WINC�S AS WELL AS TNE PNYSIC�L GONDITIONS SITE EXGAYATION OR O�f-SITE BOi?ROW, t0 GON5IST OF TNE FOLLOUJING
OF TNE SITE. N07i�1' ARGNITECT OR att7 WIRELESS SERVICES �IELD BLEND: U1rLL GR,4DED CsR,4NULAR PIT R1.1N, GR B�NK RLlN SAND, AND/OR
CONSTRUCTION MANANCsER OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ST�4Rt OF WORK GR,4YEL, SMALL COBBLES UP TO I 1/2' IN MaXIMt,lh1 SIZ� WITN NOt MORE
TNAN 10qo OF i=!NE5 P�4SSINCx TNROUGN A NO. 200 SIEYE, OR APPROVED
2. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMt�ISNIP SNALL CONFORM 70 TNE UNI�ORM 01�(-SITE EXGAVATION MATERI,4L5. SEE ,4T<T W!E�ELESS SERVIGES STATEMENT
BUILDINCs CODE, APPLICAB�E STAtE AND FEDER4L REQUIREMENtS. OF Wp}�K, SECTION i? �OR ADpItIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
3. AS�"iED SOIL BEARINCs: 2jd0fd-4�00PS1, SEE CxEOTECNNICAL REPORT 14. MAXIMUM 6' �I�TS, GDi�1PACtED IN ,4CGORD,41�llCE WITN AS7M D551 OR ASSNTO t-180.
SEE ATtT WIRELESS SER'�/ICES St,4TEMENT OF WORK, SEGtION 12.
4. PROvIDE EROSION GONTROL AS REQUIRED BY Cx01/Et�IINCs JURISDICTION.
5. RFMOYE ALL �XISTING GONCRETE ANp DRCxANIC M,4tERIAL IN AREAS I�. PROYIDE MINIMUM OF 6' OF 3/�4' MINUS MINIMUI`1 WELL C�RADED MISC. ROCK
SNOI�N TO REG�IvE WALKWAYS, SERvICE YARDS, ,4ND BUILDINGS 70 A BELOW EQUfPMEN7 SNELTER
MINIMUM DEPtN OF 6'. 16. STRIP MINIMIJM OF 6' AT aGCESS R0,4D. PROYfDE MINIMUM OF 6' O� 3' MINUS AND
TOPP�D WITN 3' OF 3/4' MINUS WELL-CxR4DEC� CRI,ISNED ROCK At AGCESS ROAD,
6. Csf�l.1B OUT ALL 5Tl1MPS AND R0075 L,4fa'sER TN,4N I I/2' OIAMETER GROl1,N 3' aT CEN7ER SEE ,4ttT WIRELESS SERVECES ST,4TEMENt OF WORK, SEGTfON 12.4.
R�MOVE aLL SCRAP METQ� ,4Np aLL �OREIf�N MATERIALS. ��, ���pRCINCx BARS 70 B� IN COMPLIANCE WItN A5?M a-614. GR,4DE 60,
7. DISPOSE OF C�E,4RED AND DEMOLISNEI� M�4TERI,4L. a5 StATED DE�Ohf'1ED BaRS UNLESS SPECI�ICALLY NOTED OTNERWISE ON PLANS.
IN ATtt WIREL�SS SERvIGES SGOPE O� WORK. SEE ATtT WIREL�SS SERYICES STaTEMENT O� ;llORK, SECTION 14 �OR ADDITIONAL
8. �XCAYAtION SNOULD BE PE�ORMED IN A MaNNER tu4-IICN WILL GAUSE A REQUIREMEN75.
MINIMUM D151URB,0.NCE 70 TNE SURROUNDINC� ,4REQ. TNE ,4REA aDJaCENT i8. CONCRETE SNALL NavE ,4 MINIMUM GOMPRESSfvE ST�NC�7N OF 3�00
TO tNE EXCQYAtION SNALL BE CsR4DED SO TN,4T U1A7ER UJfLL NOt RUN P.S,I. ,4? 28 DAYS UJI7N A MINIMUM SLUMP OF 3' ,4ND A `°1AXIMUM OF �'
(NTO TNE EXCAvATION. ALL EXCaVaTION SNaLL NA1/E SNORINCx IN DURINCz PLACEMEN?. CEMENT t0 BE fN AGCC)RDANGE WIT�4 ,4STM
,4GGORDt�10E WI1'N OSNA REC�ULAtIONS. SEE ATtt WIRELE55 SERVIC�S G 14P�, 7YPE 1 OR 71'PE 2. WatER t0 BE POt,4BLE.
STATEMENT OF WORK, SEGTIDN 11 FOR ,4DD1710N,4L N07ES. ACzGRECs,qt� IN GOMPLIANGE WI7N AStM G 33-8h. USE O� FLl' aSN 15
9. EXGAI/aTE FOR FOOtINGS, FOUNDATIDNS, AND OtNER IMPROYEMENTS PRONIBITED. ADMIXI'URES UJF-IEN USED ,4RE TO BE IN ACG0�2UANCE
TO 51ZE5 AND LE1/E�5 S�+011�l OR �QUIRED. ALLOW �OR FORM IUItN tNE �OLLOU11NCx StANDARDS At�1D APPROYED BY 7N� �IELD GON57RUCtION
GLEAR,4NCE AND FOR PROPER COMPAGTION O� REQUIRED BAGKF(LLING MANACx�R
M�4TERIAL. SEE AT<T WIt�ELES SERVIGES STATEMENT OF WORK, SEC710N 11 AIR �NTR,4INMENt ASTM C 26m-8�o
— FOR ADDITIONAL REC�UIREMENTS. WaTER R�DUGING ACsENT AS7M C 494-86
10. ALL FOOTINCsS TO BEAR ON �IRM, NATUR,4L, I�NDISTURBED SOIL FREE OF a�-L OTN�R MIXTURES ,4S?M C 494-Sb
ORC�ANIC MAtERIAJ.. OR ON ENCsINEERED FILL.. USE OF CALGIUM CNLORIDE IS PRONfB17ED.
S�E ATtT WIRELESS SERYIGES STATEMENt OF UJORK, SECTION 14 FOR
II. EXCAvAtE ALL 50FT, WET, OR 501�. OF UNUSUQL CONDITION TO Fli�f'1, ADDITIONAL R�QUIREMENTS.
N.41URaL., I�NNDISTURBED SOIL, ,4ND BaCK�ILL U11tN SPECI�IED FILL 19. tOU1ER AND WAYEC�IJID� BRIpCsE SUPPLIED ,4ND INStALLED BY OtNERS.
MATERIALS. 10. MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY ATtT WIRELESS SERYICES AS LISTEO IN STaTEMENT
12. GOM}�ACT AREAS BENEQTN STRUCTURES AND �OL1NpAtIDNS t0 95�'0 � ��
OF M,4XIMUM DRY DENS177 IN ACGORDANC� WITN aSTM D1551 OR AASNTO T-180, 2�, SPECIAL INSP�GTIONS IUILL B� REC�UIRED �OR ALL GONCRETE, REII�ORGINCs
ST,4NDARD MEtNOD OF TEST FOR MOISTIJRE DENSItY REL,4tfONS OF
SOIL USINCx 101b. (4,5 kr�.) RAI"iMER �4ND AiV IS' 1451 mm) DROP. M015TURE S�E�-. � N4LDDOU�1 GONNECTIONS.
GONTENT WITNIN 3qo OF OPTIMUM AT TIME COi"iPACTION.
1 C���I�R��. 1����5
�5 0 �,�
aT�T UJIRELESS SERYICES p miller - COOk
1600 SW 4th AI/E. PORtLAT1D, OR 91201 0
Oon architects, p.c. • a.i.a.
DOUJN TOUJN MaIN ST CELL SITE iO Kw. wt wNe. ►own�to, oRSOw� s��s ieoai tH-osn
��� I I M (�I /` �� �� �`�" 125611 5U1 MAIN 9T ,ieb No. D�t� Or�wlny No.
J� � � � �r�r� ` � TIGARDZZOR�GON 9'(� 7�,� 3/12/9� A5
_.�--- � .
P�a�o� w� aNr�NNas
;
TOUIER DESICxN BY OtNERS i
• PROPOSED 50'-m' NIC�sN MONOi�OLE
TOl.l1�R
PROPOSEp EQUIPMENt SNELT�:R
. , _ - . , . .. I,
a �
�
;
�j� �� ��' F''F,' 31[� ilt�S'�i�fi��c.a ���- y �i� i i��r
i � � � ai �f�IT�fi t�F i�5 � � 1 �I� ��
' ,� i.i,,�� �4� ,��i���4it y,,�i �tt P 3�'°i'i�'��f'�� ��� d I� #lE� � � � f,.i .�� � �- -
��!� �����i��1 i�i�!w4�� ���� k� r t a y t i l �3i� R 11ri t���;�t;1�` ��� i �1 i'I —
`��.II��ILE'�n��������'��,j���� ��I������ ,�.�'�� ��
I... I�� ��,i� G �.
FOUNDATION DESIC�N �OR
70WER BY OTNERS
1 �10��� ����,��'ION 2 ��5� ���Y��101�
�`t I/S'=1'-m' �`t 1/8'=1'-m'
O ��*
AT�T WIRELESS SERYICES p miller - cook
1600 SU1 dth AYE. PORTLAND, OR 91201 ��n a�chltects, p.c. - a.l.a.
DOUJN TOUJN MAIN S7 GELL SITE �O Kw. t.� wv�. roaru�o, owiow� �s� �eos� s�wb
�L�� I I M I�I�-4�� �� � 125621 SW MA IN ST �oe �+o. o.a o...r� No.
�� 1— � I I V TIGARD, OREGON
9,�zs 9-tc�� 3i�2i�-t a�
_ eas
/(� i � � --- .� 'r ' r-�: r ' ". ' �
r .. ` R (
/ �\ /'/�� �"j �T � lUOt� ,�, _��asr[� � a 4� �� .�`�._ .Y_ 1
\ ' � fy,'
\ � '�ti�' `'�'
/� - � � � .:.�: ':�"' '����i, + ���;y�y + ��`!' `�'�!} . . ..
yf��`'4� - - �%� r� -' :.x.. :T � ,. , � '� � �? `C"� . : �
/��J�. . •i�� \\ / i y��i� i + ' d !y'_ ` � � . .h. '
/ ��/.� //i \ � _' � '�'.1� � � L� 1--� L'� �
/� � —�� � ... ati(`. , � � ��`- i
/�,/ i. �1 r'CrI �• ''F L 7tleh ' � ', . � 1sr�.7cM �
/ �
/� �� /.� . b"'�� 'J .� + --��''�++ d�,g '�! rn. \\ I
�j_y .
/ L 9 O.��. �. C ■ �,S� �1' ."� 111.
/ �C� y ' � i,j,�t: � ��..°;a �• � � .il,uA•
i ` �s� rurr � �� �s.'p�+e�_. � 'o.o' . �: w �!� a J:�
�� , .
� " \ a_ 9_ e��� � • i�
-f�, � ...�,= fi ,.i..a,i n � �1� y+ � . ' �\
j/ ?��i� \ l. '���F s I `c , _fsm �. .. � J � .'��T. � 0
-S QS� �u..�e.� �"'o..`S► � � f �
� � �• � .�s 1 1 ~� 4` �..*' .,.T� 41 EDGl1PDp�" ST `! �'� �y,
�� Y\ ��:�n �.r = •. a�(�nu��Gn'�n,�' a�.LL,�d '°°°i ; ! ?.
C��\ ' �, /♦ �i �\ \ Y' - Q �A'SYaw'1 v � �Kw'JONA(D !,2'.1 — �`° *�
��- �({��('/ � \ ST �' s�m
. �. 1� ' ' ///. � � �\\ \\\ �} .,,. 1 s � _� � a v W MaSF R I ' ■ ��v ri.�rJ i
/,� ' \ �
� �/ �� � \ r \ � ' •
-� � �� � . �/ '�' R� ��Q �� VIClNTIY MAP
_ � / , �a �Q�. � ,
, � '• � �, �
i �
�,'. //i� � I a� \� '9./�l \` c
/ � � �
j- � , / �\ O \
�; �' \ � \ .
rUSir ra • �\ ewtn,lc �� • \�� �j� \\ ,
� V� �
// \\ • \� i c��' \ ,4� \ •
` � � \ \
� �
� aas rao�er r� �\ � � ; .
� tau 9a�s rxis�xir \ '
R
'� `� tuE a nEevnGrac �� .�� �, � ;
� u,�. ----_� �'�
` \
�� � ,
.��' `\� \ ` I �- � • ��
: �,
��� : � evnnirc �� ' a � \ �� � ,
� � , • rovrrc� �\• \ �� N .
� a�
. \ snrurra�oc raw �. 'i' � t!
� rauo+rs ko ar�as � � i � �/ ���
� r�vrrpa • �
� �ti � raura . � � �
� . �
� �� l . � ,
� �, �j� 1
, \\��� , � `,i / ,\t, �\ � ' ,
� ,�rut r ' , '�! �\ .
�� • � � '� / �\
� �\ l � .
� , ,
f' � � \
_ , ,\ \ ' �� �
REGISTERED �\ . �-� � , � \ aEaR�Ncs AaF e�sEa oN rr+E O�tEGOr� r�oArN sT�rF
PROFESSIONAL . � COOROINATE SYSTEM. THE /NFORA/ATION WAS D•'-TER-
M!IvED US l NG GL 08A� POS 1 T I ON I NG SYS TEA� MEAS(.'�-
\�� � ,� ) MENTS WJTN LElCA AJODE� 200 RECElVERS. THE
_ LA N D S U R V E Y 0 R �� ' ���\ � D�r� WAS TRANSFORAtED TO OREGON NORTH (NAD 83)
. � �� 1 / . WH/CH HAS A THETA ANCCE OF I•36'44". ,1
�� /� � � / 3E�IR/NG OF N O1'35'44" F l5 TRL�E MC.°.TH.
��ififi��y� � �� -� ' .` / . . .
OREGON �� � . � � � �
FEBRUARY 3, 1983 � ��� � � �� � �
BRUCE D. TOwLE �.
� nri�tas nars ro.vr ia �
� 203o r
--- �� �F• i
� •�• rK� �� 1
� - 1
. ,-
RENEWAL DATE: 6-�30-98 �� "� � I
�!Ti !�-�- — , �`�\� / `� � SCAL�, 1 �� — ��O r
' �� � !� � "� � —50 —25 0 50 100
t\ r�• rNi `1 � .
_ � i� � I �
- �\ �:• rKt �r � 1
� ,x,• ,�u t
�.!D S'P' IR �!D 32' !R �
- � �dOIO�G00O�GOIO�SOJIIPLN�tZ
/ LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY FOR: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES o�s�crv xsR sc�uE �°=so• s"�
. DOWNTOWN TIGARD SITE �
E�1 GI NEERS �-360-695-1385 SECTIOlV 2, T2S, R 1 W W.M. TL 1 1 G' 1 °�'"'" �R �+� 3/97 1
1-503-289-9936 ,
ENGINEER/NG INC. llll BROADWAY VANCOUVER, WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON CNECKED sor �oBNO. so» 2
_�_ _ i __ ------- � � �
1 �_�
/ `5
� 25' SETBAGK_ 1
/ �o
� ' 4 � `
Kl:��t��J:
+ � 6 I. I1'-6" X 21'-9' PR��,4�RI�AtED EG2�11PMENt SNELTER
\ � 2. 50'-m' MONOPOLE TOW�R W/ 3 aNTENNAB.
� (TOW�R �OOtINCx DESIC��I BY OTNE�2S).
��� ��� 3. C�tZ4YEL `r'aRD.
+� �' 1 3 4. LEASED A2EQ PROPERtY LINE. (T BE DET.1
,
�� ,,, � 5. �ANNO GRE�.!C
t�� , � � � 6. tOP O� BANK �
LANDSCAPE aREQ=80 SF. �� �1. 5'-0' SG2U,4RE CLNC. P�D. NAND IL NOT REQUIRED,
� I�� � � PER U$.C., SECtIOiv` 33�6. (a) EXGE tION.
� ��; . 8. EXISTINC� FENGE.
\ �,i , �� � �• 9. lU,4VEC�UID�. \
� i; i �) I ' � 10. CxRA1/�L PaRKINC� ARE�4 t�JITN (2) SPAC S.
I
� � � �
'"�� s �
,,
�. 2 \ \
��
�� %': � . L,4NDS1�,4PE AREA=80 SF. �
��� L, � �
��. �6,-��
���'. � ���._ �
_ `�� �� LANDSGaF� ARE,4=225 SF.
� �1��� � �
: �. �
��� � �
s --�,�� � �
�� �
� �
�
, �
NOR���N
� ����
�3 ,�,6�=,�-m� ..
..
o �
ATtT IUIRELESS SERYICES p miller • cOOk
1600 SW 4th AVE. PORTLAND, OR 91201 �0�� architects, p.c. • a.i.a.
DOIIJN 70UJ�1 MAIN ST CELL SITE '°�"'.«t ""'- r°"T�"�°. °"�°°" .�'°� ��.�
��� I (� I�I� 1�/ 125621 SW MAIN �v7 ,� No. �.e. or.�r�np No,
{..� I `1 � I ��� TIGARD, oRFC� 9�1�4 3/12/9�( ,43
97223
_ r
EXHIBIT C
Wetlands Biologist Report
Crealive Solutions ... Superior Service
� PACIFIC MEMORANDUM
.
B405 S.W.Nimhue Ave.
8eavertoa,OR 97008-712D
To: Chris Corich Date: February 19, 1997
Project Number: 1708-1115
Project Name: AT&T Tigard
Downwwn
Regarding: Wedand Investigation
From: Phil Quarterman, Weflands Biologist
� �l�
cc Mike Birndorf
I located the site and investigated the possible presence of wetlands. The site has disturbed vegetation and soils have been
removed and replaced by gravel in some places. It was evident, though, that the site is well-drained, and does not have
wedand hydrology(i.e. saturation to the surface for a prolonged period in the growing season). There were a couple of
localized puddles where soil has been compacted, but I would not expect ponding to persist more than a few days, i.e.
during storm events.
Typically, sites like this on high banks next to Fanno Creek, have silty soils and are well-drained. The Washington
County soil survey shows Aloha silt loam here, which is non-hydric.
I would e�ect the vegetation this high up on tbe bank to be a mixture of Himalaya blackberry and reed canarygrass, i.e.
borderline hydrophytic. This is the dominant vegetation immediately downstream from the site.
Fanno Creek, of course, is a"water of the U.S./state"and is under Corps and DSL jurisdiction. The jurisdictional area,
by definition, extends to "bankfull stage", which is typically reached by a flow with appro�cimately a 2-year recurrence
interval, and is equal to the top of bank shown on the plans. It appears that the cell site would be set at least 25 feet back
from top of bank.
In summary, there are no wefland concerns on this site.
Engineering ♦ Landscape Architecture ♦ Environmental Services
Planning ♦ Surveying and Mapping
Washington ♦ Oregon ♦ Idaho
EXHIBIT D
Neighborhood Meeting Notes
Meeting Minutes for Public Meeting
Proposed Cellular Tower - Tigard Main Street
AT&T Wireless Services
The meeting began at 6:30pm and ended at 7:30pm at the Tigard Water Department auditorium.
Staff attending included:
Kelly Sweenson, AT&T
Jason Wells, AT&T
Chris Corich, W&H Pacific
Spencer Vail, Spencer Vail Planning
Staff were present the entire time and no members of the public came to the meeting.
A public meeting for a different cell site was started at 7:30pm at the same location.
Filed: minutes.doc
AFFIDAnIT OF P�STING NOTICE
�VITHIN SEVEN(;�(�AT.F.;VDAR DAYS OF TAE SIGN POSTNG.RETURN THIS AF'FIDAVIT TO:
,< : . .. . . City of 1�gard.. . . ,. , . ... . . ,. .
.
� , _ . . . . PIanning Division . �
... _ .,_ . . .
_.. �
131..5 SW HaII Boulevard _
Tigard,OR 9i2�3 �
1, -�e��-u ��vr�n;o , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating
interest in a proposed r���c�,.�i�.ucl l�se Unn/itqfi�,�n r Li CF,�t N2or���4c�e affecting the (and
lccated at (state the approximate lo�tion(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently
registered) 1�5�2 �5�1 /l�2',n Skee� , and
did on the ��F� day of �P�'h��,� ,
19� personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a
Gond:.l;�„,u,� r�se. application, and the time, date and place of a neighbort�ood
meeting to discuss the p�oposal.
The sign was posted at S�c�e, o�' pQ,n J� Sh�re� a� c.�o��e a�(drefr .
(state location you posted notice on property)
� �/ c
S+ natu�� (i �h( pres of a Notary Public)
(THIS SKTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBl1C TO COh1PLETFJNOT,�RIZq
Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on '�he Z� day of �7"� � �� _, 19�
11�►ME�L�VInLSON /, � �
; NOrTAHYPU8l1C-ORE{a0N G,�l tL'�. �. ��✓. l��l//.���-'
rrr�°NO��s�i s,z000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires:
(_�pplicant,piease comnlese in.for�stion below:or�roper placemenc wiL'a proposed project)
���—�---������������---����������---���---��������--�������—�--------�
r�.1� OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED N�,.ti�: ' �
TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOP.I�ti'T: �
��iame of�pplicant/Owner. �
•�ddre9s or General I.oca�on of Subject Pzvperty: �
�uojecs?rooer.�-Tas l�iap(s)and i,o�:(s): �
-------------------------------------------------------- —J
n:'Jogm�paayvriaersut!postmx
� AFFIDA`7IT OF MAILING
ST�TF OF OREGON )
)ss.
City of T`i�ard } �
1, ...�e N-r� �a,r-�;o being duly swom, depose
and say that on �ek�r�ua.��, a(P _ 19.�, I caused tv have maited to each
of the persons on the attac.hed list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed
development at (or near �
1 �"(o� S � , �� ��
a copy of wF�ict� notice so maiied is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
( further s;ate that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said
persans and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post
��1C.-L" �OC2t� at ��e%f'(-t.lS wCre. ��c.l�,P.GI tnA G;�- ��a� :Slil� ,!�✓�.iwbr...5 �ve., �'-o�ve.{9-ov.
, � �
with postage prepaid thereon.
� �
Signature (1n th p�+esence oi a Notary Pubiic)
(TNIS ScCTiON FOR A STATE OF ORfGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEiNOT.�R1Zp
Suoscnbed and swom/aifirmeti before me on the� day of �e� c c , 19�.
VAN�L�VVILSON . I �
` ���'�� Ct,�w'.�w �- �1/�,�li!W
�'�'��10H°����&� NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires: '�1 -i�-����
;. ��Iicaat. �iesse mmplete i_aiormacion be?ow ior pmoer pla�ment wich pr000sed�rojec_)
--------------------------------------------------------------------�
��.�iE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED �I.�.l1E: - I
'�"PE OF PHOPOSED DEti'ELOP'�iEr'T:
'�iame oi 1..�plicanc�(��xaer.
I
� 1dc.-ess or Geaeri?,.oca�on oi Subjec:P:oper�� �
�
,�ub7ect P:roce::�T.�t l�Ia.p�s)aad Lat T(si: �
------------------------ --------------------------------��,.,��,,,�r..,—,_�-��..
. �� �, �
��'
� Date:
Name and Address
Re: Communication Facility Development Proposal
12562 SW Main Street, Tigard Oregon
Dear Property Owner:
AT&T, with the permission of the property owner, will be submitting an application to the City of
Tigard for a conditional use permit to construct a 50' tall cellular phone monopole at 12562 SW
Main Street. The monopole will be located in the back of the paint store at that address. This
monopole will be similar in height and design to the AT&T monopole located next to the Oil Can
Henry near the McDonald's on SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 125th Ave. If you are in the area,
drive by and take a look at it. At 50'tall, it is very similar in size to most utility poles and parking
lot light poles.
Prior to applying to the City for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal with
the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting at:
Where: Tigard Water Department, Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium
� When: 6:30pm - 7:30pm
Date: Monday, March 17th , 1997
The Water Department is located adjacent to Tigard City Hall at 8777 SW Burnham Rd. (see
attached map).
This will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to
submittal of the application to the City.
W&H Pacific is working with AT&T as the planning consultant on this project and we look
forward to seeing you at the meeting and discussing the proposed development. If you need more
information prior to the meeting, please feel free to call me at 626-0455 between 8am and Spm.
Sincerely,
W&H PACIFIC, INC
Christopher B. Corich
Development Planner
� Filed:I:lproject11708 1 1 1 51wpdata4�otice.mcm
CI-�Y Uf �T1G�IZU CUMMUNI7Y 1NV4t_VLM�N�I� �(�C/�NIS (C[�1�'S)
N()(IfICAII(lNtl51'fl)IIAI'I'I.I(:ANfS Wllil IANI) USf: I'It()I'(�5�15
. � WI!Sf CIT 1�1N11 lISC SUIICUMMI7'TI:t! � CAST CIT 6OIfcll l'I f CL'N77tAt.GT
�_..._._...._.._._ -_._.._.. I� _ .........�..�........r......_
• Alxlullah/1lkadl Clark(3. T.Qllor fleveily Froudo Cralg I lopkln� .I�ck llielli��i (3ilan M���lin
1 t0U5 SW 12511�Courl i32U0 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Oull Mounlain Roac 7�30 SW Verns Sliecl 15525 SW 1Uf11h/lvenue tUJG5 �VJ I'�Il�fin�lcr W�,y
Tic�arcl, OR 9722J Tlya►d,OR 91223 llgard,OR 97224 llqard,OIZ 97223 'fl���nl,Oft E►727.4 'tlgarcl, UIZ fl7?.23•39:i0
(50J) 524•10�0 (50J} 52�•0094 (5U3)634•2529
Oill Gross I.erry Wesle►man ICalliy Smill� Matk F.Mal�on Jnlin Uoni�cll�
1 tOJS SW 1�SU�/lvernie 13GG5 SW Fern Slical I 1fi45 SW Cloucl Cou�l 1 1310 SW Ulsl Cuurl 15550 SW tOJlli nveiwo
Tlgard,OR 07223 Tlyard, UR U122J TlpnrJ,OR 97224 Tigar�,UR fl722J lignrJ,Olt 97224
(503) 524•6J25 . (5Q�) 524•4550 (503)03fl•044i4
K�Il�le Kallio Cl�ilsly I lerr I_liula Meslera Joel Slaveiis
12940 SW(;Incier Lily Drlve 11306 SW Ironwood l.00p 15120 SW 141e1/lvenuo 9afi0 SW Venl�ira Cowl
llp�rcl, OR 91223 Tl�arcl, UR 972ZJ llgard,OR 9722Q flgarJ,QR 97223
(50J)'52�1-5200 (503)�9U•1070/(�iO3)824•0000 (50J)d20•7602
Ecl I low�len Darl�nra Solllcr icoll Ru�eoll Pal Wy�lr.n
11020 SW Morninc�I lill 11245 SW Morpon Couil J129! IlsymonJ Creok R�nJ 0122 SW S��iuce::lioct
11q�rJ, OR 0722J llpanl,OR 07223 Sr.rp�oo�e,UR 01050 Tlgaicl,OR O!?7.3
(503) 524•G040 (5()J)G04•U�OJ (507)G43•24�4
Oonno b Jim Roacli June Sniffrl�l�n f:al Woolnry
144:17 SW Twekosbuiy Dilvo IJU'IU SW I�IGIII I�VCI1110 12358 SW 132nd Cowl
Tlq�rd,OR 81224 TI{�arcl,Oli O12Z4 Tlr�ord,OR 9722J
(50�) 590•04(31 (5U3)5flU•0�23 (50.1)500•42fl7
Karl Sw�i�son ,J `
11�110 SW Ironwo�d Loop d
7lgard,OR 077.23 . �����
(50J) 590•3JGfl
-�..
I�LI!ASC fVOTCr In nciclillon lo�ro�erly ownors v�illiln 2501ea1,nolica of ineell�ipe � ��� ..... �"'�"�.�...._"."""'. "'."�_._..._�_�.._....
on lan�l use proposals sliail ho senl lo ell Ilie nanias on Ilile Ilsl,
. +w......�.....�...�.,.,.�.�.�..�.�........-��.-��..��.��-.�. IIIMyM1`I�Iltrv��iNn/vllrvllkn��
� �A(V S
� ,�� S� �' �``'` .
. ���� �v �
. ] �v v _\\�
CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES
Donald & Shirley Hanson Page Stevens HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATES
P^ Box 12 9180 SW Burnham St PO Box 5886
� �ches OR 97067 Tigard OR 97223 Portland OR 97228
� ��=
ald Ha 6n & Shirley DOLAN & COMPANY L L C Gerald Joan Cach
PO Bo 12520 SW Main St 12525 SW Main St
W ches OR 9 �6�.�� Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223
Alex & Lotti Finke David Hammond
Christian Hans George Radey Jr. Christine Hammond
PO Hox 23562 12551 SW Main St 3015 SW 116th Ave
Tigard OR 97281 Tigard OR 97223 Beaverton OR 97005
Otto Sorg Eugene & Vivian Davis Ray Hoffarber
PO Box 2971 10675 SW 89th Ave 12005 SW Hall Blvd
Portland OR 97208 Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223
Craig Hopkins Mark F. Mahon Joel Stevens
7430 SW Varns Street 11310 SW 91st Court 9660 SW Ventura Court
Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223
)
Pat Wyden
8122 SW Spruce Street ,
Tigard OR 97223
r �,
� ��
Ron Fowler Spencer Vail
AT&T AT&T
1600 SW 4th Avenue 4505 NE 24th Avenue
Portland OR 97201 Portland OR 97211
P
N
I q
T�gard Water Department
8777 SW Burnham Road
Tigard� Oregon 97223
-�GARD �
s� W�R
y D�
�� 4��
�
�� ���N
�c� NA��.
�
m
J
_l
�+1Gpof11ALA $T Q
z
�
r
ATTACHMENT A
4wner Authorization
)
November 19, 1996
City of Tigard Planning Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97224
Re: Land Use Application
Proposed Cell Site
To Whom It May Concern:
Negotiations are currently under way between David E. & Christine N. Hammond and
AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc., to fmalize a lease on the property located at 12562
, SW Main Street, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
� We are aware of the need for AT&T Wireless Services to make application to the Tigard
Planning Department for approval of their proposed plans, as well as a building permit at a later
date. We have no objection to their making such application at their own cost and risk.
Please accept this letter as authority from the property owner to allow the processing of
such application.
Very Truly Yours,
�
David E. Hammond Christine N. Hammond
}
)
ATTACHMENT B
Title Transfer Instrument
0�/04/9� _FRI 16_12 FAX 503 306 6177 ��_ A'TT RIRELESS�S ___ _ _ __—�,e,�� "' �f" �,.�,��
,--•�; --- -- .M-••_....-.,��_-__ ,.�.W..�w
� r : � '_� ,er 91�034908
�,�-' � .�ML a '• • � . t
;�S ��C� 1 W�M�!I����flly .:�
�
l. 'i !r`, l � �
- � 5'CA�fUTORY WARRAN'fY DEED �-�'�;�`
�, ` /f :�
�� •� e �,<
� �� JOHN R. GULLEY AND LULS I CUt t Fy }�SBAND Ati[� 1iIFE _ _ '
:,o� _,Grantor, ' ��..
��;� rn conveysasidwarrmislo_...DAVID E. FtAti'i0:3D AN� CNRISTINE N: !��R4JND. IiUSBAND ANU WIFS °�
-�:.. _flnntee, -
�''� "' F tF�e lollow:ng descclbed teal properry:ree n�liens and encumbrar,ce;cxapt as specitically u:forth he:ein: � ✓° Y:
���.
�n:� � "; SEE EXf?BIT `A" ATTACHED.
a =" � I� SUS.IEC� TC: STATUTORY POW'eRS t�YD ASSESSiSENT OF UNIFFED SEWERACE AC�NCY.. RIGH?S
� �j� I�� OF TNE PU$LIC IN AND TO TtAT PORTIOR OF THE PREHISES. EASENENT RECORDED JANUAAY ~'•� -
��::
a 15, 1959 Iti 900K 413 YAGE 436. RZGNT OF WAY A�REF?[EN'f RECO�D£D MARCH 22, 1962
� ��`� 2Q IN BOOK 459 PAGE 512: EASFSf��,"f RrCORDED MI:Y 2, 19E7 IH BOOK 640 PACE 223. l+�� -
4-�" � EASEMzNT RECORD£D JUNE 22, 1967 IN BOOK 647 PAGE 2?9. ?��;
� •x :'i� .�:'
.,e"�-`. 1aao�ds0 op . �:,� -
� �.;�:+ y: ��� ilrsiAma nnTlUeincurenaGm9��yofOrrQu ,�:�•�
, , "
� . � 7y ' A Me���/�4 �i�+ ±��1S`_'i.a t.•ASt:!Yu:'OfJ COJ�TY �-` �
� . ; �j �.4 � REAG PRL`.�£l7TY Ti�.iNS=EA TAX � �
� \s r • 1 This property is free ot Gens and encum6raaces,E}CCEPT: NONE. �: r t?.. '�
�, { � j/�°O >'-/_9( . ,� �x
;� h ,; � �;...
� � �i� o�T�
� i: �c„`�j�y,�\
_ .: �y� � .��p�
r:,� � . . . . � . � � . � �,;i�^n';
a ? �i � r
i '; ��1 ��� :
�. �
r 11;LS [NSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLC�V USE O?THE YI2QPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN f���,
'� r. ViOIATION OF AP°L1CwBLE LAND I;SE IAWS A1v�D RfiGULAT10A6.BEF'ORE SIGNITIG OR ACCL•PTING �„« °"
`':� i THLC IN57'RUMENT,THE PERSON aCQUIItI\G FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CtIECK WI'PH �� '�'••-�'
� n�
�. � THE APAROPRUTE CITY OR COU1rTY PIAV1�'ING DEPARTMEN]'TO VERIFY APPROVED USFS. -';-��',�;
The Vue coas9deration for t'us conveysnce is S 17 S 000 00 (Here eomply wi�6�he requireocnls o[OR5910J0) ����.
.rt. ' - - . . �
1 i ,
j < �'' Dated�his ZS day'ef June lg 91 . �."_�';
'JSy1 . . �q•
a . ��R�
,:: }� . ' � � ' _ �'K�':
r:� LJ.EY. JOkiN A. G L Y, IAIS I. y'.y i
1�
� ;: . . . . ���r_
� �; � � � _ . . ��
J '� •" , . ' . ��<< -
.. � �r 1
� .:� STAT6�F OREGON R f��.� :
`� �!`• CwntyoJ WASNINCTON }ts. �Y y
c ,�.;� �Y'^:
:i�: BE/T REMEMBERED, That ai rhis 28 d;ry oJ June , 19.3L—.btJpe me,tht y •� •
;:.;` �rtderrigned a Notary Pub(ie in and jor said Couhg•a.:d Stale,perrond(y appeand Are wrlhfn nu+ned ::���
` _'�- ,,JdHh vn r nTC r nrn t� 1.�•..
�
/ '�� :+.'x:
:�.j�.. . ..,r..
lmown to rr�dia be ths.�idu�ticd individual s—de.cer:ied tn and who isra��t evi�l+fn lnsbwnen�and uclo+o+vledtrd lo ;,-:;,�;;;;�y;
� ' / > �:
. mc 1ha1�� THEY �� aecvted the Jame freety and voLrnWr�l9. � , .
, y'? IN TES?1MOJ;l�:►i�/fEREOF,!have hrrc-rnro rc!my hanA aif a/ n�eJj�(at edI tt day d�Yar last�ove ��'�,L�`
wtiKen. � '
.�:z , , .. �' � y1 �+�..i_
/ �a.
�„ ��, ` ,-�G - \ x. � ��. � `-��'
� �, lVorery Publie or Oreton. �."r_.�-� �.
` `�,: � . 'f My Co+nmistlon espirc.r 4-16-44 S;" �
_ ��?;.r�.
',�t �� �- - -
. . � .. 1 ..j,�.�Lt.
" r} Ti4le Or�#er No. 700fi26 + '�4, rw
� : Fscrow No. 9150637 THTS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USH �
� .��;
c ,-: ,
, .,,.:.a,.
_ �'.:s;;.;:c;�;:.
. � -�':.c ��.
i S� �'� . �fcer rsax�my rotum to: � ";.;i r a`,`
� � -= D.�VID E. HAHMOND
1:r�_ _- - ;� '�f�`�' 20030 SV? FP.�N Trana,rr -�vf�
. ALOHA 0_ 9700b �`
.i:
3+;� Nim��Iddna.DP ' T
�, ' �•�
'�'. UnUI t Ch�np�h rpuotlsJ�II tax tLt�rn�nt�fHap Da Mnl +� ''`��
�: b th�IoUO�inp�ddnK 'i i 'S1�'
yi., 1js}(2D E_ }3AF4fOND
; �;y Z�930 S57 E �.
� QI `— L
wm.,iaa�.�.ao
f' t' '1'�'
- .. -- , �.;�,�,,
s .;;w„✓•; . . , . . . . . • - ---- •-- - � -^
04/04/97 FRI 16:13 FA� �03 306 617i A'1'1 4111t�Lh55 _ _.J�fi .,�: �,_,,
"� s
I � • "' "� ♦
� ' . • , ` ''i
O
• • �.
Order No. 70Q616 ;
�� •;-
�KHI9IT "A' : ="-;.�
�. ��` g�z; �
eeinq a part of the Gaorge Richardaoa Dona[ion Ldad C1aim No. 38, y� �_��, �
'� ia Townsh£p 2 South, Ranye 1 Ea9t, �iillanette Fteridian, in the •` .
°� County of Washinqton and State o! Oreqon, to-wit: °. "�� �
r, s- f:,�
9eqinniaq at a poin� ir, tha center of Taylor's Ferry Road in .the :'�4, �Y'=
Gaorge ktichardson Donatlon Land Claim No. 38 in Section 2, �� � < ar
Townahip 2 South, Range 1 Ke�t, Killamette Meridian, in. tha ''. ^; � �
County of Rashinqton and S.ate of Oregon, which said beqinninq ��i'�:s'rt�,��'„°. �,. .�.,
•;!Y�: u
paiat is reached by beqinning. at a Foint on tha xozth line of. 3����; _ . �_ 7�,:
said Richardson Donation Land CLain which is the Northeast corner �` `��i', k'=
2F- =
� ot the Geo_qe rrsafng land in said clain, ano runniaq South • j
�• 41•15' East 30 feeG to a point i� the center of aaid Taylor's '�` ;� '�:
Ferry Roa�J thenee follpwir.g :he center of eaid road North a6'27' " ��'"� � �
EasL 539.9 feet eo tha anqle in said roa3; thence alon3 the � 1��� ; ' � :�:;` ;�
center of said road North 71'S3' Sast �69.60 feet to a point; �'•-�4- �;�r,
, thence dortn 57°S4' East 2.50 feet alaag ' the center lina o! paid :`<;����t
Taylor's ?erry Road to the tzue point of beqinnin3 cf the parcel ; �{�;�`�" �!:',� =
` , ��r`;. �:f� .,-:�.
herein described� i:henta North 57°54' East 117.Oa faet alonq tha _, `�� � ��� �
eenter lina of said Taylor'e eerry Roa� to a ooiat ai the moqt � ,;;;�_j? _
'x� Northvesterly eorner oE TracG � in Burnha� Tract� a recordad plat ��s�.' -
� ln Lha �eeozds of �inshinqton County, Oroqon� �lianee South 4S'3Q'' )�;'�, :; �- "ti
East 128.70 feet .alonq tha �iesterly liae of said Trac� + to an :���,� ;� �,
�;='�.
izoa pipes thence South 76•15' East 126.G0 faat alonq the ,3�.f�?=:' , ,��
. ISt�� Y
Wasterly !lne ot said Lraet 1 to an iron. pipe at the mosC � � .y��,: ^' �{
Southwesterly cornPr of ssid Tract 1 a�d the ,most. Northwesterly �-'�t�'�- ',� • '
eorner of Tract 2 ot said 8urnhan Traet� thence South 4'15' Last i `- ; �z
115.65 fest alonq the Resterly line af' said Tract 2 tc. an iron' sZ� .;•
rod; thence HorCh 43°02' Hes[ 352.90 feet to s poiat in the � S � �`•�
cente= line of said Tayior's Ferzy Road and tru• point of �;` '�'`,��
'�r�:.
� beqinninq of tT.e herein descri6ed tract. '� ".+�r-'�'C
.r �_ .r_:
.�'. - :2-.
ETATE 0!OREDON � ,�: ,� �:'i• '
SS ^;�
Cour..y ot Wa�hlnpton _� .`' -
::Y ~'�`' �'
� � 1,Jerry H.Her. ' 01 Aa.easmenl. . " ' � _
and Taxallon aod�-0�I�r,io der W Co�- �: � � �T
�r�Yance�lor�IC aoun,y,�YtlfNr� rtty that . - � � �`�: �
� the witAin�'n!rwneM rn wrililr�_ �eslvad. ,: I
u+d recor�d ifr Oook of ncard�Of�al cuny. �,, . _ �
-t _.` ... - �' s' • .�
� � y Jv:Y R� Hany�l �Qir •a of . i - r i
Mseaim�nl'a�d�Ta�cat Er � S' ` .
�, � OKidO GbtY1t1�,'I�ft�'r ��l
�: � >� , ��;��.: t
� �h�, -, /�.. � ' `�� `1
.. ,1 r "'i�a�:7 �
w t �41- {
. . . . •l:�Y�.tr��"�r_ , � ' •��'� �
� Dor_ : 91034908 ° �;�'
Rect: 57261 213.00 ��,
;:.
•� �7/pl./19y1 1U:48:4.iP1M ' '+�
2 `�
r i '�, `ti _
�- � ,'
a::. �, :
�' �s r:: y�
,
i ` '�'��`t:
4 .��r.......�+— -*- -, � { n�r= •i
� � � - <, . �t'v i � ' ���, . yr v� ' � .
e ., �i � �., .y� �la � ,.. �" �'- �'� • i
'4}t �. �1 . � a. � �`� t ylc ti
r�" :: J¢ . ,,f � � .,�� � M1 '• � � • � ! : . � �.` ti' �f �/-�h�T '�� `� �p r`` ,tii:�; '1.
� ,V' �`}�,v J irl. -;,�.
,! r � �i .� ��"�� -��,..�-.' J ` . . � � ` 4.1', 7. t 1-. t�.7. �3 f: 'y� Y t:: i � Y�_ �
�,t a rx � r .k"c � ✓,,'ar. �.�t �� i-;.� e. �r� '"'«YT �f. � .!�y � � r1���� f��-� ,� f ''S- ���r,
�.iL"'�'s'S � [ y � � �+ � � , wf r . ,y'-�� �'�. �.'i�
F � � ,� { � t � �r" � 1 i a JG.' + ti ►a /' �-to 2 :7� . � X�'�,i 1
�i- .��:-� �;..��r.t�,,j� .�.ti Y -:e�a,- -:T � r"x,`` .r x �. Sz ;,'/!�' � i .�.._ . i ~� s. . r t- . y �'! - �`;.,
� �
� ��r �_ . . ' � . , � �.� ��
..� { �� � � �. .� �,4-� �� `� xi.y �f�.. �a�� ����`�..r� �Z§�...$- "z",,.�i, � "� .
�'-�-✓ � �r;.i . �� �- i1 : . i . �' Y �.,.•.�3r- - t �'r'•�S'^t�� K � --
� � t -� �� � . -. ti� . L.. w' �. . 4.� < "'s, �" 1 , f1,��` .-tir
� f�f ��� T��r- 1 t r � �1 �� ���}. j�' =�u.� ..�- �r� 1��` � �'
�� L�. SY- � !V
!(� ei � IM nJ✓+�.�' j��R�; ti ya a�,.��� + , �� �i.� t �•v!. f�.v .I 4T� r�K - . y�+: K.
- 'y ..ti ,��J { t} �y. ��'T��:'G't.��.���f T 1�4�,, i ' , �-•R �.r�= iir,�1� �c��� � �fi� S �'y :rt � +�F _ ,4t -
`~~ � ^�?�e+"'Fn��,:,� 4��.1„�.�'�r-Ck 1-,7.,�' ,y 1.,��" -t r.,�t} ',f. Y � + .7 TJC�1 �..+Y --r' �-Xv`L'�.,r� -•.�7 � �1��' �
.�.' ������1f �r l .� ,�C.tiY2� '�1.-K �t �.r � � /.Y� f.. "£. , ` � �5... '� ���t n�. .- �. � :'
^ '`�i°. ."S �y��'.?y�,3✓�"li �� ��.S� +�`� }`� � f `^ �i '•� i. � ti h r tt� �I � .�_1 � +�-r .
"'�x y" a vl�, <�' J, t t , �{,, G.+ � C Si �" �i !� ��y� �n y, � :
"�j, r w�,� 1 : _. � � y , , � _ . � ` . ;.7h IR� Y 5 �� � s�'w, �.1.
1� �,.� r' � � � � .,. ., �-��k���� '. •.`•,p�rG+� �,
1.. ��h� r. }} r �1 . ��f� t�7` r� .c(`� � i' �,� �Y:a 1 . " ri�Y- - r.,y , ;;
r K,���f Ci'�r L Y�t � � ��ir n x" ir. ���r��r 7 :�`k � }.3�' -�` �},
. r'�:�, naf•" � Z���✓vr.!.,�_ .��f�' I ��.�v'✓� �r-� a ' vr ��'i:}� ��+'���'i�. � /a�r'�..� � �?`"'r�...�C�.�' - ,
Ji f�y'�"?S� - �^li3�i 'j,.,fi.'��.?^S i.�,`�.. � ��r.:: . �...} 4{'.t4.�Y'*J �..w„��-;. � S .�� I .I
. Y�f ..r ,r +r ��;w?N .O•.r•� •.a�
. ti . . , . i •Yi•,`�>��.LL..iH�II��C♦ � �.�.
}l . . � 1;� 'V'. . .. '
�I,�N�:�.�,X+...' . . ' w , a
ATTACHMENT C
Pre-Application Conference Notes
__
� CITY OF TIGARD
:; . - . . -_
PRE-APPLI�ATION CON
�ERENCE N�TES ��«�
NOM-BESIDEMTIAL
_ �� -Z � q7
� �r,�: t"'l�� Y3
� , ��`� asar: .� � w, G,�; ,` 4��
�uc�urr � � v,�,
S c�E�' ✓o�
�-bso�[ l 2��j � �2.`�� P6•o� [ l 2a 3_ o so s
rB0fE6T1l96ATI01� p�--
� 2, S �2sw l�IQ :� S��
��ss: a / � e y�
T�YIU/TA�IlAT: 2-�-G- f `� !-d�`"
� � Y�.Qv-!�c / a�l�ti cL-
��r�ueano� ���o�l�`�ud/
�- .
I ¢-�/ k, �.�,�--�
e.r�u 0�scs�na� s6 ' r,�o�e a 1 Q a��l �-Q lQ
I s � � ,
"�YPHE8D1S1YE ��u-{-�( �us� he�s {�►s�-��� ��.d3 O
�All�ESI6NAT181k
� Tt�l� L-eK�'}"�a r �u sI�e s S t� �s�t� �. � �10
01[Dt6 OF�16lN
�CR�11 t11Y0lYEiImiT �°C
s� f�IUTAT9@: S-'�-�S�
�� P80t1E [5831
�p� ka�e- abkf
ZtiMif16 DISIBICT 0lMElIS10MAL 8E IBE�dEMiS b
Min�um lot s¢e:L►, sq. ft Average lot width: �-r . Maximum building height:�4 ft.
n p d�s F r o n t�ft. Side K'l� ft. Rear ft. Comer ti a ft. from street.
M a x i m u m s r t e c o v e r a g e: �S % M i n i m u m l a ndsca ped or natural v e getation area: �_°�a
�ehrbGdeSactl�at8.�l Isv`���K�.+0� h,�kl�Ns s�•�l 6� a%���
'�" Gl�.�- vJ rle� �c,c���``9 �.J J�
A801T1AMA1 LOT DIYEMSlO Qo�Exrs �
Minimum lot fro tage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created a part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a
minimum 15 f ot wide access easement.
The depth of a lots shall not exceed 2� times the average width, unless the parcel is less than
1� times the min um lot size of the applicable zoning district.
�efer b 6ed�Sectleo 64.060-Lotsl
m�naa�o rn�aan..ca.noa N.as ra�e 1 a:
_-�...m�r.�an..R�!Naew�s�a
'�ECtAI SEiBACKS ,.
➢ Streets: �J feet from the centerline of �' � ��� ��
➢ Established areas: h feet from
➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's bounda�y.
➢ Flag lot: 10 foot side yar seiback. k/g
[Beter to�ode Se�tloa$ad 18.961 �
.�AECIAL B911D[M6 8E168T P80YIS1011S
Buil ing Height Exce 'ons - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75
feet provided: 1�o'�Q���r��j� �r kor,-���t�ab�e t�-ac�W�'�
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least 'f� (half) of the building's height; and
➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district.
[��fer b C�de Sactfon 18.98.OYOl
'A61UM6 AMO ACCESS �
Required parking fo� this type of use: � A
Parking shown on preliminary plan(s):
Secondary use required parking: � /�I
Parking shown on p�eliminary plan(s):
No more than 40% of uired spaces may 6e designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces.
Parking staps shall be dme ioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space imensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft.
➢ Compaci parking space imensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft.
[B�ter b C�de SeW��1 106.9ZA1
➢ Handicapped parking. All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and
dimensioned disabled rson parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person
parking spaces io be pr vided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by
the Americans with Di ilities Act (ADA?. A handout is available upon request. A
handicapped parking spa symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface a�d an
appropriate sign shall be p sted.
Bicycle racks are required for multi-f mily, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks
shall be located in areas protected f om automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycla
pa�king spaces shall be provided on th basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular
parking spaces.
Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width:
Minimum pavement width:
All driveways and parking areas, except for ome fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas:
[8eterU G�de Sectlen 18.106 and 18.1081
R1�t1W9 rrs-�OO�catlM bdaeace Na�es hne 2 W f
��npru�.�t s.enw
wwn�aY sEQote�orrs
Walkways shall extend rom the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs,
ramps, or elevato�s of all ommercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide
the required access and eg ess. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings
in multi-building commerci I, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways
should be constructed be een a new development and neighboring developments.
[Refarb C�de Secdon 1 8.0501
�ADtM6 ABEA RE@018EME11TS
Every commercial or indusirial buil ' g in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a
loading space. The space size and loc ion shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
�ofer t�Code S�ctlea 18.106.878-0901
EA6 YIS10N A6EA
The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at
road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/�oad intersections. The size of the requi�ed clear vision area
depends upon the abutting street's functional classification.
�eier b C�de S�ctl�n 1�.10Y1
t�'f60t6 AND SC6ff1��6
In o�der to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise o� visual impacts between
adjace�t developments, especially between different land uses, the City requi�es landscaped buffer
areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of
width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and
must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or
fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The
required buffer areas may QpI�C be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional
information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
[�ter a C•�e C6aanr 18.t09�
The required buffe� widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows:
ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary.
ft. along south boundary. ft. along wesi boundary.
In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along
�iHS . "
Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as
driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the
public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street
trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above
grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the
proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be
obtained from the Planni�g Division.
..rt�ns� rr.�an.o c.or�eoce Maes �e a a:
��J..Y..NM..�w�.MYlM���hw����rf���t LHI��
A minimum of one {1) tree for every seven (7} parking spaces must be planted in and around all
parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include
special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design
features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed
information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses.
[Beter U Code C6�pt�rs 18.100.18.106 ind 18.1081
6NS
Sign perm� must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for
S+gn Permit " handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code
standards m be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review
application. A natively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the
Hearings Officer.
�efer b C�de Sactl 8.t141
c�TEheA C�ode provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to
� areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25
percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the
pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, Zh� res�onsibilitv to Reciselv
i��ntify sensitive lands areas and their boundaries is Lhe re�onsibilitv of the a�o(icant Areas
d�veloc�ment a�nlication.
Chapter 18.84 also p�ovides regulations for the use, protection, o� modification of sensitive land
areas. Residential develo m n i�Rr�hibited within floodolains. "
1
(&fer b Ca�O S�tN�la.E41
IIIRD SENIESA6E A6flICT[OSN BOf�B S?AMOABDS�B�0 96-44
�ur2se:
Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shal! preserve and maintain or create a vegetat d
�� corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality fu�ctioning of the sensitive area.
Design Criteria:
The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the define
� boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City t
reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduc
I the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directe
to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowabl
encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent o
I the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet i
width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet.
�
_rr��fnraan�w�ata�Maes ea��a a:
,...t.�.dHa1.�tl..R,a,1�.lee.rt..tt S�ctl..
@�:strictions in the Vegetate Corridor.
No structures, deveiopment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicafs,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed beiow:
➢ A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is
paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel
walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the
sensitive area, unless app�oved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be
� constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and
` ➢ Water quality facilities may enc�oach into the vegetated co�ridor a maximum of 10 feet with the
approval of the Agency or City.
, Location of Ve�etated Corridor:
In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate
owne�ship, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and
shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
�ater U 8 a�96�4/YSA BeO�ti�es- 9a� br SW�D
�dEE BEM�rAL PLAN BE!
A tree pan fo� the ing, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be
provided fo� any tot, parc or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for
a subdivision, major pariiti , site development review, planned development or conditional use is
filed. Protection is preferred ver removal where possible.
The tree plan shall include th following:
� Identification of the lo tion, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the City;
b Identification of a progr to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D.
according to the following st dards:
➢ Retainage of less than 2 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program accor ing to Section 18.150.070.D. of no nei loss of trees;
➢ Retainage of from 25 to 0 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section
18.150.070.D;
➢ Retainage of from 50 to 7 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
that 50 percent of the tr s to be removed be mitigated acco�ding to Section
18.150.070.D;
➢ Retainage of 75 percent or grea r of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
no mitigation;
� Identification of all trees which are propose to be removed; and
_..T�F TiW1 hr-A�pOtatlp C�aiere�C�N�es P�e 5 u i
�I...n��1+..Rh.,b.....,�..c s,W..
� A protection progra defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during nd after construction.
Trees removed within the eriod of one (1} year prior to a development application listed above will
be inventoried as part o the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section
18.150.070.D.
[B�fer to Ctde Sectlsa 18.15Q02
716AT10M
Replacement of a tree shall take place a ording to the following guidelines:
➢ A rep(acement tree shal be a substantially similar species considering site
cha�acte�istics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the s ecies of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably
available, the Director may low replacement with a different species of equivalent
natural resource value.
➢ If a �eplacement tree of he size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or
would not be viable, t e Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in
accordance with the Ilowing fomnula:
➢ The number of repl ement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated
caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest
reasonably available r lacement Vees. If this numbe� of trees cannot be viably located
on the subject property, Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to
be planted on other prope within the city, either public p�operty or, with the consent
of the owner, private property
➢ The planting of a replacement t ee shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section. a party may, with the consent of the
Di�ector, elect to compensate the City for its osts in performing such tree replacement.
�e�er to C�de Secdeo 1i.15AA70 ml
�4B6AT1VE
The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval
standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider
an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal.
[B�hr v C�de Sectlau 18.321 �
� '9AE�s. ��
18.80 18.92 ✓1 100 �8.108 18.120 _ 18.150
� 18.84 18.96 ��.102 _ 18.114 �18.130 _ 18.160
_ 18.88 _ 18.98 ✓ 18.106 _ 18.116 18.134 _ 18.162
18.164
_�7Y tFT16AR0 M�pllqtlql C�da�ea�s N�s hD�6�i i
s-tssl/�I nMcariaRt��n�.pra...c s�al..
...�a�sYOOr
As a part of the application su mittal requirements, applicants are �equired to include impact
study with thei� submittal pac age. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities nd services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transponation system, including b eways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water
system, the sewer system and th noise impacts of the development. For each public facility
system and type of impact, the tudy shall propose improvements necessary to meet City
standards, and to minimize the mpact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected rivate prope�ty users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the de ' 'on of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication re irement, or provide evidence which supports the
conclusion that the real p�operty dedicati n requirement is not roughly proportio�al to the
p�ojected impacts of ihe development.
[�ehr m��de Chapter 1t.32.Seql�a.0501
When a condition of approval requires transfe to the public of an interest in real property, the
app�oval autho�ity shall adopt findings which supp rt the conclusion that the i�terest in real p�operty
to be transfer�ed is �oughly proportional to the im ct the p�oposed development will have on the
public.
�eiarb Ca�e�p�er1a.32.SutNo25tl
�Ii868S�B9�80 M�i1M6
The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and
� the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between
� the mailing date and the meeting date is �equi�ed. Please review the Land Use Notification handout
conceming site posting and the meeting notice. MPP ' g is to be held prior to submitting your
annlication or th� a�nlication will not be acce�ted.
7 [Sofar u me li�ts6b�d Ye��ni�tl
��Y�LDiC
Applica should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with
Pride Disp 's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177.
�er«u c sccn.■n.ns�
iemo�uu coNe�g�s oe co�ons:
/� l,(�e�l a�s � �o�r a�r� 2 S � � � v- � � e
, — cQ ch e L'� i
�
SG�BHj�. O� u� lt� �
t � �
a
✓' �L+^a�ol �L
vIe ��� s ✓ t S f �� .2 a
a[�'2
���� L/
_._ �ministrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Office�.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council. �
R�nCAEB Rrs-A�stl�■pdetac�M�es hDe 7 d i
...FSau..tW��.r�•aiKtlM .
APPLlC!lnOM SOBMRTAL PBOCESS
AIt applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff inember of the Community
Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. pLEASE NOTE: Aoolicatons submitted by mail
Qr dr000ed off at th� co�nter wiLhout Planning DiviSion accentanc� ma�be retumed. Apolications
��� h�T ;��,�,.e�+p,� ���r �•nn p �� on Fridays or 4•30 on other week davs.
.
��Q Q��hmittP� ��*� �n aonlicaton Shall be folde� IN ADVANGE to 8 5 bv 11 inches. One 8.5 inch
�.y 11 inch mao of a Rro op sed {Zroiect �h uld b� submitted for attachment to the staff reoort or
administraive deciSion Anolication with unfolded mans shall not be acce tp ed•
The Planning Division and Enginee�ing Division will perform a p�eliminary review of the application
and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff
will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are
required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Plan�ing staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this
matter would be heard by the Tigard �1� H � � . A basic flow chart
which illusVates the review process is available rom the Plan�ing Division upon request.
' �is pre-application confe�ence and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the
prospeciive applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the
p�tential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to
discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
PLFASE NOTE: me umeresca�nius caann cw�r ao e�de re�meots and asuects
�f l�i�s�e�a9 t�at s��tdd�A�fl b tbe dev�l��rm��t W ri�s�ptaa
FaDare a t� stati b prwide fahrm�Uw r�qaaed bY We C�de shap a�t
a�m�e � r�ahRr tf We �ppticible st�aduds �r revairemeats. a ts
rtc��mead�� m� � pr�ecth�e av�faac ��h�r •I�aia aad r+�� me
Cae�mo�y QeveleDme�t G�do ���c a�tfl�estl�as�f C�I statf reMtive b
��de re�mtQts prtor tt sabm�a9 m aAp�cati�a
An Additional pre-application fee and conference wiH be required if an application pertaining to this
pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six {6) months following this
conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division).
�a�a�m Br:
emr Of n6ARD�LAM 1116 DIYISIAN
�69NE [5031639-4t11
fAX: [5Q3]684-7297
n:vogin�o+cMmssis.sb�eaco-c.msc �
"�►y$�ctio�:msstars�eappt.enql
'-Jan-97
..'R�f flC�n rrr-Ap�lto ddere�ca M�tes pa9e t d f
eM-teslM�tlal�tw/f'lt����rwnt Saetln
CiTY OF TIG�RD
CO��t,titU�vITY OEVELOP,�tEvT DEP.-�RT���E,uT
,-�PPL1C.-�TION CHECKLIST
cmr oF noA�o
T�e itzrrs on the checklis� belew are required for the succesful completion of your
apGlication submiss�on requirements. This chec:<list identifies wha[ is required to
be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted
wit"� all other aGGlic3ble materials ac the time you submit your land use aqplication.
See ycur applic3�icn fer further explanation of these it2ms or call t,`�e City of Tigard
Planning Oivision at (503) 639-4171.
Sta�: G�44 /3 Date: 6 4
.�PPLIC�TION 3� REL�TED OCCUtiiEvTtS) SI:B��11Ti.�L REQI;IRE.titENTS iNCtuoE � ,�n,�RK D I Eti�s �
A? Application fo�m (1 copy) ��
B) Qwner's signaturelwrrtten authorization " ��
Q Title transier instrumenVor orant deed ��
D) ,�pplicanc'; statement Vo. of Copies ��
� Fi1in; Fee S ! /�/S
SITE-S�ECIFIC ,t�t,�P(Sl/PUN(5) SUBr�tITTAI RFQUIRE.MENTS INClUOE � nn�+RKED ITE�.15�
A) Site Inio�matio� showin�: No. oi Copies �
1.� Viciniry map m�
2. � Site size & dimensions v�
3. Contour lines (2 it at 0-10 0 or 5 ft tor grades > 10°0) ��
-�. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ��
�. Locations ot natural hazard areas including: o
(a) Floodplain areas ❑
(6) Slopes in e.�ccess or ?5 0 �
(c) Unstable �round ❑
(d) Areas with hign seasonal �vater caofe c
(e) �reas with severe soil erosion potential ❑
(r� .�reas havin; severe(y weak �oundacion soi(s u
o. Location o� resource areas as snown on the Comprenensive
��1ao Irventorv includin;: _
(a) �vildlire hab;tacs �-
(b) �Vetlands �
.•. Other site ieatures:
(a) Roc`.< outcroopin;s �
(b) Trees �vith 6" = cafiper measureci -� �e�� Trom ground level ra.�
8. Location o� existin; siructures and their uses 2/
°. Location and type or on and orr-�ite nois2 sources �
i 0. Location o� existin� utilities and easements �
1 1. Location o� exis:in; detficated ri;ht-or-wavs ��
La.�O 1,5c.+T°L1UTlOtv I L15T P.aGc : Cf ;
Bl S�te Develapment Pl�n i �tin : �\ of Copies �
t . Tn� proposed s�te snc' sur�oundin�, procer;i�� ��
�. Contour line intervals ��
3. The location, dimensions and names or all:
(�) Existing � placted stre�ts 3� other public ways and
easemencs on the site and on adjoinin� properties c
(b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements
on the site o
(c) .�Iternative routes or dead end or proposed srreets
that reGuire tuture extension c
�. The location and dimension or:
(3) Entrances and exits on the site ��
(b) Parkin; and circulation areas a�
(c) Loading and services area a/
(d) Pedestrian and bicycfe circulation o
(e? Outdoo� common areas p
: (fl Above graund utilities m�
�. The location, dimensions & setback distances or all:
(z) Exisiing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and
easements which are located on the site and on adjacenc
p�operty within 25 feet or tfie site ��
(b) Proposed structures, improvemencs, uti(ities and easements
on the site �,f
6. Sto�m draina;e facilities and analysis o� downstream conditions rd�
%. Sanitary sewer facilicies o
3. The location areas to be landscaped ��
9. The location and type of outdoor ligntin; considering crime
prevention techniques Q�
10. The location or mailboxes c /
11. The location o� a!I struc;ures and their orientation r�
12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements o
Q Gradin� P1an lndicatin�: Vo. of Copies �
The site development plan shall include a ;radin; plan at the same scale
as the site analvsis drawin�s and shai! contain ;he roilowin; inrormation:
1. Tne focation and extent �o wnic� ;radin; will take piace indicatin;:
{a) General contour fines �t�
(b> �ioce ratios �
(c) Soil stabiiization pr000sa(is; �/
(fi .�poroximate time or year �or the pr000s� site c�eveloprnent a/
?. .� statemeni �rom a re;is:ered enginepr supoorted by data �actual
substantiating:
(a) Sunsurracz exploration and ;eotec�nical engineering report a
(b) The va(idity or sanitary sewer and storm draina;e servic� DrOpo5aI5 ❑
(c) Tnat all problems will be miti;ated ar,d how they �,vill be m;tig3ted ❑
1.�.�0 l,5"c.a?°::UTiOrv/LLST a,{G'c ' CF i
D) .-�rch;tectur�l Or�.vin � '�dic�tin�: ' , ot Copies �
� The �ice development F � �roposal sn�fl �nclude:
1 . r.oar p(.�ns �ndi�ltin; ;nz �qusre roocsge ur sil ;;rur.ures �
proposed ror use on-;ite �
?. Typic3l elevation drawings or each struc;ure
E� lsndsc�oe Plan Indicltin�: No. o� Copies �
The landsc3pe plan shail be drawn at the same scale or the site
analvsis pfan or � lar;er sc31e i� necessarv and shall indicate:
1 . Description ot the irrigation system rvhere applicable ��
'_. Location and height or �ences, buriers and screenings �
3. Location or terraczs, decks, �nelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑
-+. location, rype, size and species or existing and proposed plant materials a
�. Landscape narrative wnicn also addresses:
(a) Soi( conditio�s o
(b) Erosion control measures that wi(I be used c
� Si n rawin 5• p
Si;n d wings shall be submitted in accordance with Cnapter 18.i 1-�
oi the ode as part o� the Sice Development Review or prior to obtaining
a Build ng Permit to consiruct a sign.
G) Traific Generat n Estimate: G
H) Preliminarv Pa itionllot line Ad'ustment ,1�1a Indicatin : No. of Copies
1. Tne owner � the subject parcel ❑
?. The owner`s uthorized agent ❑
3. Ti�e map scale �0,�0,100 or 200 reet— 1) inc`� north arrow and date ❑
-�. Oescription or p rcel location and boundaries ❑
�. location, �vidth a d names o� streets, easemencs and other public
�vavs within and 'jacen[ to the parcel �
b. Locatio� or all per anent ouildin;s on and within 2� reet o� a(I
�roperty lines �
i. Locaticn and width oi all water courses �
3. l�cation or anv tree �vithin 6" or greater calioer at � �ee� aeove
�round IeveE ❑
9. .�ll slopes ;reater than ��°a �:
+0. Location o� exis:ing uti 'ties and utility easemencs a
' �. For major land partition nich creates a public strep�:
(a) Tne oroposed ri;ht r-way location and width o
(b) ,� scaled cross-�ectio o� the preoosed street plus any reserve strip �
1 '_. �ny applicaole deed res;ric; ns ❑
i 3. Evidenc� that lane� parition � ill not preclude enicient �uture land
division wnere apolicable �
:���:.Sc +P�'C��iOv/L;$; ?,�Cc 3 CF �
I) �uhdivi.ion Preliminlrv�Pl�t �1�p �nd Dzt� Indir�tin�: ,���, o� Cupir� __
• 1 • `czle zGusfin� 30.� , t00 or 'CO �ee! ro �he ;rcn snd I��n�ced �o �n�
pn�sz F�r ;����t �
?. i he propo�ed nsme r the sucdiv+sion c
3. Vicinitv map sho�vin propem's relationship ;o srterisl �nd
coifector streets �
-�. ��ames, a�'dresses a ce:e�none numbers or the o�vner, developer,
engineer, surveyer d desi�ner (as applicable) o
�. �ate or application �
6. 6oundarv l;nes or t c: to be subdivided ❑
-. �+ames or �djac2nt uo�ivision o� names ot re�orced o�vners or
adjoining parcels or n-�uodivided land �,
3. Contour lines �elated a City-est�blished bencnmarl: st ?-root intervals
ror 0-10 0 �rades ;reate an 10°a c
9. The purpose, location, type d size or all the �oflowing (within and
adjacent to the proposed sub 'vision):
(1) Public and private right-o ways and easements o
(b) Pubfic and private sanita and sto�m sewer lines o
(c) Oomesti� water mains in uding fire hydrants o
(c� titajo� power telephone t nsmission lines (50,000 volts or ;reater) c
(e) Watercourses ❑
(� Deed reservations ror par s, open spaces, pathways and other
land encumbrances ❑
10. .�pproximate plan and proi�les o roposed sanitary and storm sewers
with ;rades and pipe sizes indicat on the plans �
1 1. Plan or the proposed water distribut n system, showin; pipe sizes and
the location o� valves and rire hydran a
12. �pproximate centerfine proicles showi g the i�nished grade o� al) streecs
includin� strept extensions �or a reaso able distance beyond the limits or
the proposed subdivision C
13. Scaled cross sections o� proposed stre t right-o�-way(s) G
1-�. The location o� al( areas subjec: to in ndacion or storm water overtlow c
1�. location, width & direction o� r�ow o alt water courses & drainage-ways e
I6. The proposed lot conngurations, appr imate lot dimensions and
lot numbers. �Vhere lots are to be us fpr purpO5e5 OtheC than
residential, it shall be indicated upon su � locs. c
l:. i ne location o� a11 tre�s �vith a Ciamet�r incnes or g�eater measured at
= �eet above �rouna fevel, and the Iecati o� pr000sed tree p(anciros _
18. Tne existin� U525 Of the prooemr, incfc:cin the location oi afl s;ructures
df1G� che present uszs or :hE S��UC:UC�S, cf1� S�di?Rte�1( Of �.vf1iC+"1 �i�L'C:UfE'S
are to remain arter �iattin; �
T°. Suoolemental in�ormation incfucin;:
(a) Proposed Ceed restrictions (ii any) e
(b) Proo� o� property ownership �
(c) � pr000sed plan ror provision or subdivis� n irrorovements :�
20. Exis;ing natural features incfue'ir,� rcc!< outc-000irQs, �ve►.�ancs & mars:� areas ❑
?1 . Ir anv or tFe rore;oin; in�ormation cannot prac;i olvi ce s��own on tf^e
preliminary plat, it s�all be incoroorateti into a n rative and �ubmitted
with ;he application �-
U��LS�.v�O:,'Ui.Cv J U5: ?,aG"c=CF i
�) �U��� -��Ceis C�IC�I1tiOn�:
K) Other Information No. o� Copies � C�'
We�- a�s a,u� l0� — ea.v' �'�� la��,
d�(�ti��ati �s t� f� � r,U jk 6w� �� o�—
a 2 S � G ��
�- l � ., � � . S u�.�
s a ' '
� ev a � ��u�ca d f— vy.�
r -r- ���/
DO� G�'�?(fQ `f K� �OO- t� � 40 4 �N .
5:':cg�n'a:�'tnasaers Jdc:is:..-:st
�uv:�.:49i
_�.��t c"c.i?°.:C���C�/_iST i.aC:i CF i
ATTACHMENT D
Photograph of a Similar Installation
i�
{
i
� �
� � -
� ��
� w
i
- ..; _._. _ . ..
. • �S.p . . --
_ r_��.,�.. –�^'�,+ ^ _u– � • _' � . .__'. ----��.r—._ .._ .
. . _-----�- . '---- . -'- -
_ .. --- "_--�_�--„^f .. � _ • .
� '-- . . �,. +.�. . ': . .
!�S i�s 'r.}3 .}�`'- � - .
�j� �c�sr.. , .
. � . r . _ .. ..
_ ' � ,�• -
i�f' `
x + t � ��'''�
, -`�{: �„a �. _ : `•.:r, .*
. '.�,# - r .._,. `Y�r '�'�"� :`"' ;+�
� : '!; ^y s .; - .�,::
:► -- " ' � -� �:�c.x"�
' �'". 1
♦ f. •,: �.:i; �.�Y, :�a
'� '��� {� r � �, ':� ! -"a �-a
�T.
_ il . < <.�
�
-- - -- _ '� '
�. 1 t:
� �,
� ��,
��
�
:..
- ri
� �4
� R 1��.
� �.� -_, :��
� ��_ K. �: ,
_._. ._ ,�- f `'°'-�_ .'�:.....:::� � - ,� I�I ,
_ �
.
_ } . t 1�.
.
/
i.
�
-
. "t
a
- . -� .�.-'•.:
,�; r!__.__ �� , �.�� `�
-.. �
s; -
—
'�. �� +=} �'-�
Y' 'i
,. �r..� __ �,� 4Y���,a�v.�+,z � » `,�� y ; � '�;.
- � y ,�I! � 1.f.1 a'r�.:.r1�D l �� r . . 1 . ��e 4 �2.� f � � .
.r' i� . ,' .. ��i �>'.. . �r�, �t"' o ?'.° �f ,, Sr rp`^�n�v,�`iaj, y t..,.,a � .i. ....
..,R. .awrtvt?�` 4 .:.-�,I- i {' ; _ ''°i '� 1�"`�.I'� �'t •�y]Sti 'j'�9'r +y'�." } �- .��`+
- �.s.—.^�it'� :. ■ �- . . . 4 ' ��p,; ��� �c F. �F vr �y .. � a. ♦ �J3r-4' ..
•� � ..',a,s�f'r -: 'C'''t Y l'^��' � � ;° „F. �.'M" �.�'�z��Y '�R+4�:-.^ ��.i���,-'�
i+ _�1�. ��i+t��' � .�.w• .��z,' `� �r�-.9' +�_ g,'� R ��,.,�,y :y.f.. ,�y,{xe"��.FW A ' � '�
�j: t�.1.iS y.. � .'a�L�.S ��'et'S � c�k� {,s�+a"Si''�-'��.,�c 3"_ �•, Y.�
�,, �. �.,, �, ;:�'r
r .r. ;.rt
♦
. •
.
� ,
T UALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE
°;F�� FIRE PREVENTION
�, ;�'. " 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538
Y';;
July 15, 1997
Mike Birndorf
W&H Pacific
8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue
Beaverton, Oregon y7U08-7I2G
Re: AT&T Monopole Tower ('ct���3�-cXn�
12562 S.W. Main Street
File Number: 1557-97
Dear Mike:
This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 editions of the
Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and
Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other
local ordinances and regulations.
Plans for the above noted project are conditionally approved subject to the following:
A Halon fire extinguishing system for the structure has been approved by Fire mazshal
Jeff Grunewald as an alternate method for access requirements.
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 526-2469
fEi 1:iii�tG t11e a�::�e r.�te�f:le r.»n?ber.
Sincerely,
� � �
�
Jerry L. Renfro, DFM
Plans Examiner
JLR:kw
cc: City of Tigard Planning Dept. �
"Working"Smoke Detectors 5ave Lives
CITY OF TIGARD
May 7, 1998 �RE(�aQN
Ryan Young
DG Garvey Corporation
10101 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 207
Portland, OR 97219
Re: Minor Modification to the A.T. & T. Monopole Facility for use by Nextel
Communications
Dear Mr. Young:
This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to the previous
Conditional Use Permit 97-0005 that was approved for this site. The modification
request proposed to increase the height of the monopole from 55 feet to 100 feet in
height. The Director has approved this request subject to the following Condition of
Approval based on the findings contained in your April 27, 1998 letter.
1. Pursuant to Section 18.152.050(B)(6), evergreen shrubs shall be provided which
will reach six (6) feet in height and provide 95% opacity. These evergreen
shrubs shall be extended around the entire perimeter of the leasehold area.
Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division.
In order to avoid any unnecesary delays, please submit a copy of this letter with the
Building Permit application.
Please feel free to contact me concerning this information.
Sincerely,
Mark Roberts
Associate Planner, AICP
i:curplNmark_r/at&tmod.doc
c: �''1-0005 land use file
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
• ::::::.. ..:::::..
■■■■■■■■.■■..■.■.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.
■.■� ,....■.- .
...� ....�
■■.� ....
■.■� ,... :::�
� ■■.� .■■. ■■■�
...� ...... ....
■������������r����
■�����������������
u�uv -���u��n
.""" _'.'�-
D. GARVEY
CORPORATION
PROJECT MANAGERS
Apri127, 1998
Mark Roberts
City of Tigard
Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Minor Modification letter to approved AT&T telecommunications facility.
Dear Mr. Roberts:
On behalf of Nextel Communications,we are addressing Section 18.120.070(B)for consideration
of a Minor Modification to a Conditional Use Permit application approved by the City of Tigard.
The AT&T application was originally approved in 1997 under City files CUP 97-0005 and VAR
97-0003. Nextel proposes to construct a 100 foot monopole tower and equipment shelter in the
same lease area that was previously approved for AT&T. T'he proposed Nextel facility is located
at 12562 SW Main Street. The properly is located in the Central Business District(CBD) zone.
The code criteria for a Minor Modification,presented in the attached narrative, is presented in
italics, followed by our responses. Enclosed please find the following application material for a
Minor Modification review:
1. Application Narrative(2 copies)
2. Overall Site Plan(2 copies)
3. Site and Landscaping Plan(2 copies)
4. Site Elevation(2 copies)
5. Filing fee: $100—filing fee for Minor Modification. A check for$100 is attached.
If you have any questions,please contact me at 827-0293.
Sincerely,
wt, �.
cll�ll�
J
R an K. Young
Project Coordinator—Land Use
cc: Scott Greenberg,D. Garvey Corp.
Manon Burke,Nextel Communications
� Dlo1 sw li�w..�u•� j31��
Suite�7• Portland OR 9721(�
(503}8��• fax(503)847-4898
�i7��30��
APPLICATION NARRATIVE
MINOR MODIFICATION REQUEST
FOR NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Project Descri tn ion
Nextel Communications(Nextel) seeks to expand its Pacific Northwest Enhanced Specialized
Mobile Radio(ESMR)network to include the proposed Bonita/AT&T site. The proposed site is
located at 12562 SW Main Street in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Central Business
District(CBD).
'The proposed communications facility would be located within a 1400 square foot lease area in
the western portion of the parcel behind the existing paint store. The site would be located in the
same lease area that was originally approved for AT&T. It would include construction of a 100
foot high monopole mounted with three(3)omni -directional "whip"antennas for an overall
height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The 15' high whip antennas,approximately 3
inches in diameter,would be attached to the supports near the top of the existing platform. The
facility would also include the placement of an 11' x 20' prefabricated concrete equipment
shelter.
The shelter would be used to house radio transmitters,receivers and other essential equipment.
Mounted on the shelter would be two(2)receive-only Global Positioning System(GPS)
antennas, which are 2"high x 4"wide x 4"long disks. One of the GPS antennas would be
operational;the second antenna would be for backup purposes. One test mobile antenna would
be mounted on the cable bridge. The test mobile antenna is low gain and is 4"high x 8"long x
4"wide. It is used for site monitoring and diagnostic purposes only. A six-foot high chain link
fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. T'he facility would be
remotely monitored for fire, smoke,intrusion and AC power failure by Nextel's 24-hour
electronic surveillance system.
The facility may be expanded in the future to include up to one additional omni-directional
"whip"antenna pointing upward. Alternatively, future expansion could include up to nine 1' x 4'
directional sector panel antennas,which would replace the three to four"whip"antennas. Future
expansion may also include up to two microwave dishes, eight feet(8')in diameter,mounted at
the 60% and 80% levels. There is no anticipated change to the dimensions of the equipment
shelter. Expansion of the facility is not a certainty,but is dependent upon customer demand
and/or technological change.
Also in the future, it is anticipated that other wireless telecommunications providers would
collocate their antennas onto the Nextel tower at an undetermined height. The other providers
would also install their equipment cabinets within the project area.
The proposed facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses. Due to its
extremely low power,this facility will not be a source of interference with electronic equipment,
including radios,televisions and telephone transmissions. Non-interference is ensured by the
Federal Communications Commission(F.C.C.)regulation of radio transmissions. The site will be
unmanned and,therefore,will not require water, waste treatment or management of hazardous
waste. Access to the site would be provided from SW Main Street. Minimal traffic would be
generated during the construction phase while the crew is traveling to and from the site. After
construction is completed,there would be approximately one visit per month by a Nextel field
engineer for routine maintenance.
Nextel and ESMR
Nextel is the largest domestic operator of ESMR systems in the United States. ESMR is an
advanced form of wireless communications, which offers a combination of features and services
not previously available from cellular telephone or other wireless communications companies.
The integrated digital communications system combines a digital cellular phone, group
communication, a two-way radio, an alphanumeric pager and voice mail in one handset.
Like cellular telephone calls, ESMR calls are handed off from one facility to another as the caller
moves through the area. This allows for reuse of a finite number of frequencies at low power
levels.
Need and Purpose For the Proposed Facility
Nextel is continuing to build out its Pacific Northwest ESMR network,in compliance with the
requirements of its FCC license. The need for a new site is dictated by market demand,capacity,
coverage requirements for a particular geographic area, and the radio frequency hand-off from
one site to another in order to achieve the objective of seamless communications coverage. Once
the need for a new ESMR site in a particular geographic area has been established,Nextel's
system engineers identify a target area,or"search ring,"in which to locate the facility.
The required site location and antenna height is determined by a propagation study. This study
evaluates the expected radio-frequency(RF) signal from the proposed site at a given location and
height. The RF signal must be strong enough to provide adequate coverage within the desired
coverage area.
The selection and design of a specific ESMR site is further refined by considering local
topographic and geographic factors,tree canopy,buildings,mountains, water bodies,the ability
to mitigate the antenna support structure's visual impact,compatibility of the facility with
existing land uses,and the ability to negotiate a mutually beneficial lease with a landlord.
Because ESMR signals must travel in an unobstructed path from the facility to the user,the
presence of any one or all of these can negatively influence the quality of transmissions and
reception. The height and location of each Nextel site is, therefore,based upon the ability of the
site to effectively function despite those obstacles. In addition,Federal Aviation Administration
requirements regulate the height of an antenna support structure near or on major airport
facilities.
T'he purpose of the proposed Bonita area facility is to provide in building coverage for downtown
Tigard. The proposed facility would"hand off'calls to Nextel sites in the City of Tigard and the
City of Tualatin. It is crucial for Nextel to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve
customers in compliance with its Federal Communications Commission(FCC)license
obligations.
` � . ' . � . . . . , � ' ' . � � ., ' . . . ' ` . . , - , � .'�,'r7
� .`', . _ � - � � ' ... � .. � � . . . � , .. _ . . . . ... . . ,. .+ . .t�
. . • . . - .. . .
.., , �. :; . .. . . � . . , • , . , .. , . . _ . . . .
�.. . . . �. � . - , . . . . . �� . . � . . . . , i..,
.. . .a, . . � . � . ., . . � �. � , - ' ' . ' . _ � � . � � � � - .. . .' � �-
Minor Modification A��roval Criteria and Pro�osed Findings—�Section 18.120.070�
1. An increase in dwelling unit densiry, or lot coverage for residential development.
The proposed addition of antennas and construction of an 11'x 20' equipment shelter
does not involve a residential development,therefore,this standard does not apply.
2. A change in the ratio or number of different rypes of dwelling units. The criteria is not
applicable as this request does not involve a residenrial development.
3. A change that reguires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.106.
There is no required parking for this use. One parking space located adjacent to the
equipment shelter will be provided for maintenance purposes occurring approximately
once per month.
4. A change in the rype of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform
Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of existing structures is
proposed. Therefore,this criteria is not applicable.
S. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No increase in the
height of the existing building is proposed,thereby,satisfying this criteria.
6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site tra�c
would be af�'ected. The proposed modification will not require a change in accessways or
parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected.
7. An increase in vehicular tra�c to and from the site, and the increase can be expected to
exceed 20 vehicles per day. The proposed modification will require approximately one
trip to the site per month for maintenance purposes,and therefore will not generate or
exceed 20 additional vehicle trips to the site each day.
8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent
excluding expansions under S,000 square feet. The addition of a Nextel equipment
shelter will be approximately 220 square feet(11'x 20' lease area), and therefore this
standard has been satisfied.
9. A reduction in the areas reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that
reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the
open space area by mare than 10 percent. There will be no reduction in areas reserved
for common open space and/or usable open space.
10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreation facilities, Screening; and/or, Landscaping
provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent
where specified in the site plan. The proposed modification will result in the increase of
landscaping to the site,thereby satisfying this criteria.
11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review
approval that are not the subject of criteria[BJ.1 through above. The proposed
modification will not preclude compliance with the original Site Development Review's
Conditions of Approval,satisfying this criteria.
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
- �,f(� / � �
�U,� /� SrEEt vt�r[ �
� �f .\ OvER u,wro�C �
�' � , '�� \� �
., � `\� /��j , \\ \\
� \ �d` i � \ ' \ ,
� ; � flEC7 l .
_ / �ELE W �+E,F.�R�Lf \��� .!�^'� \��
4. �/�.
_` /. _ . � \\ . rC1ER R1507 \�¢�_ . _{�j�� \�
: . , \ \\ �y r`� \
. �� \ \ � � �
� I � �
j � P��j � � \\
. i //�� . � d/�c0�/+G �\
�� / • . - \ �'
� �'�' ".��
. .,-^\ r �`. , �\\ , \\
��� �; \�� \�� rsu.w� vr i.a. EeEv. ��r.n F► ��� \\ l ��
� � � aos rlo�$r�rorE/�e.� t1Ev�r�crr B�SfD Or+B+r�AL►A. C0. �
�' � , sa'rs nrr3 Pna°Earr t��E�' �� o.�rw � • � �
��� • �� ar rr�su�coin�tirE. , � . �\ 1 " ' � � \
, I \ � , \� ,
� � `y�i
� \ 1 i . \
p ; � ��� soturrdr usrr�raw ua�xi New Chaln Link Fence i ' � �
� I \
I • � \ \ ,
�� + \� /� I '\`. ✓P �.
♦ � I ���
� 1
\ � \ I ��/.� 1
\ � .
� / . 23.00'i.1 ��/ `
\
\ • �
. \ ' �
� �g ' \
� Nextel Lease Area j \q Q�
`` 1 ,, ��
� '
.. , �\ �� �� ��\
� � 1
� ' �.�\� �!\� ' �
\ �
\� t ���\^ -- , � � \�
\��\ ��O � •, �,�V � �
� � \
. �
�� � w+rt� �
. � � ��: � �
` ,o- �r 1 ' �
100 foot Monopole Setback ---� �\ . /• �' ��� � �1 ' � /
oEdoWtb _ . / .� . . /
�
\\
rvo-rES: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
SITE NUMBER: OR0104
(1) PLAN SHOWN IS A GRAPHIC
REPRESENTATION OF LEASE AREA. BON ITA - ATBcT DATE: APRIL 28, 1998
12562 SW Main Street REV:
(2)THIS"EXHIBIT B"MAY BE AMENDED OR •
CHANGED AT ANY TIME. TIgBfC�, OR 97223 Page: 1 04 3
. . . . _ . _ . . . _, ., ,.. _....�-_-.,_..� .._ _�-_..--..,_.,..�.,,_
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
` ��
. ,�,0
POWER LINES f
�� \
� ��
� �
� ��� O� ��.
\ ��
. � � � y�•
� � .� , �.� ,,��,�
, _ PQ� ��..
� � _ �
PROPOSED 100 MONOPOL �O �Cr
<<- _ .
. � � �P � _
4� i I Q� �
, , . \,P�
� I o
5� �
11 X 20 SHELTER
- � ^ j' . ��
x =1f-_. ""�=— N�=-�— =T. — ,��
� J
1S X 24 PARKING
� 60' .
oP
NorES: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
(1) PLAN SHOWN IS A GRAPHIC SITE NUMBER: OR0104
REPRESENTATION OF LEASE AREA. BONITA - ATBcT DATE: APRIL 28, 1998
(2)THIS "EXHIBIT B" MAY BE AMENDED OR 12562 SW Main Street REV:
CHANGED AT ANY TIME. TlgarC�, OR 97223 Page: 2 e� 3
. . . . . ., ..-...,... ..._.....�.-,�.,...�,�.,..,.-�•.-..-.,-�.��.-�-,,..,_..,�.,:..�.�.�
PRELIMINARY EXHIBIT "B" Not to Scaie
Site Elevation
-- Proposed(1)FWUreOmn�-Wh�pAntenna(Up)
v
lwelve Panel
Antennas � Proposed(3)OmnrWhlp T
Three Sectors i '� ::� Antennas(Up)
(Fulure) -
Four Per Face
f6
N
>
0
�
�
�_ ________ FutureB'MicrowaveDishal r-
60�of Tower He�ght
Future B'Microwave Dish al �
�� � 60%of Tower Heighl n
O
C
O
GPS Anlenna(2) �
O
For dense tree areas: p
Mount GPS antennas PropoSeC
on tower above trees 11'x 20'Shelter �
W
� Chein Link FEnce .+"" �x ,�t-•����� �
ji.: �;�Ti. � .
�, �` ,., ���� .. �
Door to Equip.
� Fence
Shener �
I
J' '� Y�_ �. ��, ztr �..y�� �4�e � . :��3°'i'•a
7
I
rvoTES: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS SITE NUMBER: OR0104
(1) PLAN SHOWN IS A GRAPHIC
REPRESENTATION OF LEASE AREA. BON ITA - ATBcT DATE: 3/12/98
(2)THIS "EXHIBIT B" MAY BE AMENDED OR 12562 SW MAI N STREET '
REV: 4/29/98
CHANGED AT ANY TIME. TIGARD, OR 97223 Page: 3 of 3