The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP2000-00002�� J � 120 DAYS- 9/71/OO CITY OF TIGARD Community�DeveCopment S(apingA�Better Community CITY OF TIGARD 'iNas(zington Cou�ity, Oregon NOTICEOFFINAL�ORDER BYTNENEARINGSOFFICER Case Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2000-00002 Case Name: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION Name of Owner: a vin res erian urc ttn: a e er Name of Applicant: ame Address of Applicant: anter u ane, i ar , Address of Property: ame Tax Ma /Lot No.: as in ton ount ax ssesso s a , ax o A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE fACTS, FINDINGS AND CON[LUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLIfANT'S PIANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, LOMMENTS OF REYIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLIfATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON jUNE 26, 2000 TO RECEIYE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLI�ATION. THIS DEfISION HA� BEEN BASED ON TNE FACTS, FINDINGS AND fONflUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS fINAL ORDER. Request:-➢The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. Zones: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Action:-➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance � Affected governmental a encies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner�s) The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 6, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 21 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY 20, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP2�00-00002/CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER , � , , BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR'TI�CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Calvin Presbyterian Church ) F I N A L O R D E R for a conditional use permit for a major modif'icadon ) to an existing church at 10445 SE Canterbury Lane ) CUP 2000-00002 in the City of Tigard, �regon ) (Calvin Presbyterian Church) A. SUMMARY The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit(CUP) for a major modification to an existing church. The applicant proposes to build a 16,670 square foot addition that will include classrooms, multipurpose rooms and accessory spaces. The applicant will restripe the parldng lot,compensating for the number of parking spaces that will be lost to the proposed expansion. The applicant does not propose any signif�icant changes in church activities or other church facilities on the site,although landscaping will be added as required by past decisions. The original church development occurred in 1965. The City approved expansion of the church in1992 and 1994 (see final orders in the matter of CUP 92-0001 and CUP 94-0004, incorporated herein by reference)_ City of Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the"hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on June 26, 2000. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permiG See the Staff Report dated June 15,2000. One witness appeared for the applicant. No one else appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application, and the applicant waived its right to have the record held open. T'he hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and took the case under advisement. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit subject to the conditions at the end of this final order. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax lot 02800 COMPREHENSNE PLAN: Low Density Residential (1-5 dwelling units/acre) ZONIlVG: R-3.5 (Detached single family residential) APPLICANT AND OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code ("CDC")Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765. 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer")received testimony at the public hearing about this application on June 26, 2000. The record closed at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). a. At the hearing,the hearings officer received and physically inspected the file maintained by the City regarding this applicadon, including comments received after the Staff Report was issued. The record includes all materials in the file prior to the hearing, testimony and evidence entered into the record at the hearing, the list of witnesses at the hearing and the tape of hearing proceedings. The record is riled at Ciry Hall. Hearin�s O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002 (Calvin Presbyterian Church expansion) P��e 1 � b. The hearings officer announced at the beginning of the hearing the rights of persons with an interest in the matter, including the right to request that the hearings officer continue the hearing or hold open the public record, the duty of those persons to testify and to raise all issues to preserve appeal rights,the manner in which the hearing will be conducted, and the applicable approval standards. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest� 2. City planner Julia Hajduk summarized the Staff Report and the applicable approval criteria. She corrected the Staff Report to state that the applicant will restripe the parking lot to provide at least 42 compact parking spaces and asked the hearings officer to modify proposed condition of approval 1 accordingly. She also corrected the finding regarding "building height, size or lot coverage" on page 5 of the Staff RepoR to state that a condition of approval is not necessary, because the proposed structure complies with dimensional standards. 3. Architect Russ Leach testif'ied for the applican� He summarized the history of the church on this site. He noted the proposed building site now is mostly covered in pavement� He aclrnowledged the church site does not comply with minunum City parking standards, but,because the applicant is not proposing to enlarge the sanctuary,additional parking is not required at this time,except to make-up for seven parking spaces lost as a result of the development� He discussed landscaping, noting that the applicant will replace vegetation planted along the north edge of the site with arborvitae shrubs that are more likely to survive and to provide a buffer over time. He waived the applicant's right to hold open the record for a final argument 4. At the end of the public hearing, the hearings offcer closed the record and announced a decision to approve the application. C. DISCUSSION City staff provided basic factis about the site and vicinity in section III of the Staff Report. They recommended the hearings officer approve the application, based on the applicable standards and responsive findings in sections VI through VIII of the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval in section II of the Staff Report. T'he applicant accepted the findings and recommended conditions without correchon or objection. There being no material issues in dispute,and there being no issues about which the hearings officer believes additional or different findings are warranted, the hearings officer adopts the Staff Report as his own findings as modif'ied a�the hearing in this matter. D. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local,state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval wacranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. The applicant's request,CUP 2000-0{)(x)2, is hereby approved,subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report,with the following amendment: a_ Condition of approval 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: Submit a reviscd plan that shows all of the exis�ing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposcd parking shall include Hearings O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002 (Calvin Presbytcrian Church expansion) Pa�c 2 at least 42 compact spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of the addition. D TED this Sth da July, 2000. Latry Epste' , Tigard Heanngs ficer Nearings O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002 (Calvin Presbyterian Church expansion) Page 3 . • � . � , . Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: June 26,2000 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE ^� HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD Community�DeveCopment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Shapir�,�Bette�Comrnunity 120 DAYS = 9/11/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2000-00002 APPLICANT/ Calvin Presbyterian Church ARCHITECT: Robert Gray Partners, Inc. OWNER: Attn: Ray Beyer Attn: Russell Leach 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 1000 Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and � ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5, low-density residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approva�: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 1 OF 15 6/28/2000PUE3LIC HEARINC STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � ' � THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Planning Conditions: 1. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the , site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of this addition. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion or an acceptable alternate will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Planning Conditions: 4. Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. In addition, the remainder of the parking area shall be re- striped to provide more visible pavement markings. 5. All site improvements must be made in accordance with the approved plans. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION II1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: Based on information obtained in past decisions, the original sanctuary building was constructed in 1965 and was subsequently remodeled in 1972 and 1982. In 1992, approval was granted (CUP 92-00001) to add a new Narthex, fellowship hall and classroom addition. In 1994, approval was granted (CUP 94-0004) to construct a new 9,700 square foot sanctuary, add parking and modify the driveway location. Vicinity Information: The site is bordered on the north and west by property zoned and developed R-3.5. To the east and south are streets, with R-3.5 zoning across the street. Also, across the street is the John Tigard House. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a church facility constructed in several phases over the past 30 years. The proposal is to construct a 16,670 square foot addition that will house classrooms, a multipurpose rooms and accessory spaces. The applicant is not proposing to add any additional parking spaces to the site, because the sanctuary (which is how parking requirements are calculated) is not proposing to be enlarged. The parking is currently non-conforming because the standards have changed since the last approval in 1994. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 2 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTiON IV. DECi�ION MAKING PROCEDURES, P�RMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 ists the Use ategories. The applicant is proposing to build a multi-purpose room with classrooms and kitchen facilities associated with the existing church use. The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the R-3.5 zone. Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 De ines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) is a major modification to a Conditional Use permit which is a Type III-HO decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summarX of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera Approval nteria) Additional Conditions of Approval) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810� E. Impact Studx SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a condit�onal use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 3.5 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc., and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 3 OF 15 6/28l2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size; shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is already developed with the church facility. The a�ea of expansion does not require the removal of trees, parking, etc and appears to be suitable for the expansion. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to senre the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-3.5 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for Religious Institutions specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD R-3.5 CONDITIONAL U5E PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq. ft 3.5 acres Minimum Lot Width 65/90 ft. SAME AS R-3.5 295 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft 25 ft 30 ft(no change) Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft 20 ft 235 ft Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 68 ft(no change) Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 45 ft Maximum Height 45 ft. See note(1] 38 ft.approx. Maximum Site Coverage[2] --- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] Minimum Landscape Requirement ---- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] [1] Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. (2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] The proposed addition will be located where there is existing asphalt,therefore,there will be no net increase or decrease in impervious surface or landscaping. As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone and Conditional Use standards are met. - The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390 Decision Making Procedures;18.510, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2�00-00002 PAGE 4 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ` The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use. ection 18.330.030.B states t at the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facifities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this addition above and beyond what currently exists. In addition, because the area of expansion will bring an outdoor play area, indoors, the noise level will decreased. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the expansion area will comply with the height req uirements and the location is in accordance with the setbacks. Because of this, an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; A condition is not necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, there is no change in the parking or access and no increase in vehicle trips to the site. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; As discussed further in this report, additional right-of-way is not necessary and, therefore, need not be required as part of this approval. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage andlor surfacing of parking and loading areas; There is an existing buffer with landscaping along the property boundaries. A site visit by staff revealed that trie landscaping along the northern property line is minimal and does not include shrubs that were shown on the 1994 expansion plans. The 1994 plans showed a hedge of Fraser Photinia installed along the fence line. A condition of approval is recommended requiring the applicant to re-install this landscaping (or similar hedge) along the fence line where previously shown. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been proposed. Because the use is existing, it is expected that the existing signs will remain, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that a change in signage is desired in the future. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 5 OF 15 6l28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; �� " The lighting is not proposed to be altered as a result of this expansion. There are no known compfaints regarding lighting from adjacent property owners, therefore, staff finds that existing lighting levefs, as previously approved, do not impact adjacent properties. Because no change is proposed in the lighting, no additional conditions of approval are necessary. Rec�uiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for the�r installation and maintenance; As previously discussed, the applicant should be required to install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 approval. No additional buffering and screening is necessary provided the applicant comply with screening previously approved. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Fences are existing and are adequate. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas, or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed w�thin the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the followin� condition is warranted by this Conditional Use approval. Any other conditions listed above are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere in this report. CONDITION:Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway, which does not cross the parking lot or access way, which will also serve the area of expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 6 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' Wher�ver required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Re9uired walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and As stated above, the walkway does not cross the parking lot or accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The existing walkway is paved with concrete, thus satisfying the criteria. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the reyuired access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The proposal does not increase parking requirements, therefore, this criterion does not apply. In any event, the site has one, 24-foot-wide and one, 30-foot-wide access into the site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are satisfied. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development proJ ects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees �n accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are existing, therefore, this standard has been met. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. The proposed expansion is in a residential zone and abutting residential uses on all sides. While the site is not classified as a residential use, it is not a use listed in the buffer matrix requiring screening from adjacent residential uses either. In any event, the site has an existing 20-foot buffer along the north property line and a 13-foot buffer along the east property line. As discussed previously in this report, tf�e applicant must install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 land use approval for the sanctuary expansion. To the south and east are streets. The proposed expansion is taking the place of an existing asphalt play yard and will have a landscape strip installed around the penmeter of the addition. Because the formal buffer is conditioned to come into compliance with the previous approval and the addition will provide additional landscaping around the perimeter of the building, no additional buffering or screening is needed. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 7 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS aFFICER Screening Special Provisions: ' � Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying ,and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There is no change to the parking or existing parking lot screening, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Off-Street Parkin� and Loading (18.765): � e -Accessible Par cing: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site has 8 ADA spaces marked on-site, whereas, only 6 are required based on the number of parking spaces provided over the entire site. Access Drives: With re ard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street �o off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface• and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsec�ion 18.810.030.P, groups of fwo or more parking spaces.shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All of the access drives are existing and are not proposed to be modified, therefore, this standard does not apply. _ Parking Lot Striping: . Excep�ffor singfe-fam�ly and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the ofif-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter.shall have all parking spaces clearfy marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking is existing. A site visit revealed that the existing striped parking is very faint and is in need of re-striping. As will be discussed further in this report, the applicant will need to re-stripe some of the parking .spaces to provide for 7 more parking� spaces. Staff recommends that the entire parking lot be re-striped at that time. It is stafif's understanding that this is planned by the Church, however, a condition is necessary to insure that this is accomplished. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel sto at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. �e front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 8 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � The parking lot and lana�cape areas are existing and are not proposed to be altered, therefore, this standard does not apply. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. While the parking is existing, the applicant will be re-striping some of the parking to create compact parking spaces and make up for 7 spaces that will be removed as part of the expansion. The applicant has provided staff with a re-striping plan that shows the parking re-stnped to provide for 32 compact parking spaces at 7.5 feet in width. The standard spaces will continue to be 8.5 feet wide or larger. The existing access aisles will not be altered. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional si�ns shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There is an existing bicycle rack that must be relocated because it is in the area of expansion. A condition is necessary that the applicant submit a revised plan that shows the new location in accordance with the standards in Section 18.765.050. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements a pply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/Z feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicfe parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bic�cle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There is an existing bicycle rack on-site, therefore, the detail of the bicycle rack is not applicable. The location will have to be revised as discussed and conditioned previously in this repo�t. Minimum Bicycle Parkin� Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area, however, because the applicant is not revising the main assembly area, no additional bike parking is required. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 9 OF 15 6/28l2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parkin for a Religious Institution is one (1) space�for " every finro (2) seats. The existing sanctuary sea�s 500, therefore, current standards require 250 parking spaces. The applicant has indicated that there are 150 parking spaces on-site. Based on review of the last CUP approval for the site, however, there were 169 spaces proposed (only 94 were required), 9 of which were in the vicinity of the expansion. A site visit confirmed that there are seven spaces that will be removed in the area of expansion. Because the parking is currently non-conforming, approval can not be granted for any development that increases the non-conformity. By removing spaces, the non-conformity is increased. Staff contacted the applicanYs representative who reviewed the site and determined that the existing standard parking spaces could be re-striped to provide some compact spaces. By re-stripmg some of the parking, 7 additional spaces can be picked up. The applicant has provided staff with a plan that shows this is possible and feasible. Based on this, a condition is necessary that requires the applicant to re-stripe the parking lot in accordance with the plan submitted to staff on 6-14-2000 to provide 32 compact spaces with a net increase of 7 spaces within the main parking lot area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces. . Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. . Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. not a pplicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does PP Y- FINDING: Because the appficant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or wl�ere no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 10 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER / C. �ADDITIONAL SITE �EVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVN� CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Develo�ment Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, the�efore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Bufferin�, Screening and Compatibili� Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parkin�); 18.360.090. 4 (Landscaping); 18.360.09 15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Relationshi to the Natural and Ph sical Environment: ui ings s a e: oca e o preserve exis �ng trees, topography and natural draina�e where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subjec to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining .buildings for adequate light air circulafion, and fire-fi hting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wincf l�rees shall be preserved to�he extent ossible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree �emoval. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the ex pansion area in a location that will not require the removal of trees, does not decrease the bu�Fers and does not remove parkin . Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division and will be reviewed�urther as part of the building permit review. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safetv: . Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; . Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by ofhers; . Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; . The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the�angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and . Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy �pedestrian or vehicular tra�fic and in potentialfy dan erous areas suc�i as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. �ixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficienf to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this pro1'ect and has not indicated concern of objection with the proposal. Staff, therefore, interprefs that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the crime prevention standards have been met. Public Transit: rovisions wi in the plan_shall be included for providing for transit if the development prop osal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after Ci and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths �o the shelters. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 11 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The site has frontage on �W Canturbury Lane and SW 103� Avenue, both of which are greate�than '/4 mile from the nearest tri-met route, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construct�on standards or t e imp ementation o public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Street And Utility Im�rovements Standards (Section 18.8101: �hapter 18.810 provides construction stan ar s or�mplementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of- way width and 24 to 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a minor collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on this street. No additional dedications are required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved to City standards. No additional improvements are necessary. SW 103�d Avenue is also fully improved adjacent to this site, inside of a 50-foot ROW. No additional ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards fo� Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage A�ency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 12 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � This si#e is presently serv�., from the City's public sewer syste�,.. The new building addition will be served from the existing onsite private lines. No additional public line work is necessary. Storm Draina e: Genera Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site presently accommodates any upstream surface water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City wifl require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Even if the building was to be located in an area that was previously landscaped, the new building addition would be adding approximately 4,356 square feet of new impervious area. Any additional areas under 5,000 square feet are considered insignificant and, therefore, do not necessitate the installation of an onsite detention system. Utilities: " Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above �round, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,b00 volts or above, and: . The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; . The City reserves the right to approve location of all surtace mounted facilities; . All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and . Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-groundin� costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authvrity determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 13 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBlIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be or� a case- ' by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development fo� which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilifies. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. Overhead utility lines on both streets have been previously addressed by the applicant. No additional work is necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPR VEME ANDARD : Public Water S stem: his site is presenty served from the City's public water system. The new building addition will be served from the onsite private lines. No additional public water line work is necessary. Storm Water Quali : The ity has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USAj Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. There are two existing onsite water quality swales that were constructed with an earlier phase of this project. The project engineer, Tom Sisul, submitted a letter, dated April 24, 2000, that explains that there is enough capacity in the existing swales to accommodate the additional impervious area. Therefore, no additional water quality facilities are necessary. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and othe� pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. - FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have been met outright and no further conditions are necessary. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and ty pe of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet Git�r standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertX interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has provided an impact study which indicates all necessary improvements will be made. The applicant is not increasing the number of trips, therefore, a TIF will not be required and there are no requi�ed improvements or dedications for this expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 14 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � SECTION VII. OTHtr� STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: . Site requires 3 fire hydrants. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comment: . A new double check valve device assembly (backflow protections) is required to be installed directly behind the existing water meter to meet current requirements. The City Police Department and The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met and US West were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. � '� June 15. 2000 PREPARED . Julia adjuk DATE Associate Planner !. �.11��'��G i��'..4t�� - June 15. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard B ersdo DATE Planning Manager i:lcurpinvulia\cuplCalvin Presbyterian.doc CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 15 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � --� -- - — . - • �—��_ m � _I _ _, �EO�A,o�� oa,.,.�o� s.s,�E,� _ -��_��' D NA�_D � �Rp � ' � � � � ' VICINITY MAP �ST o � �� ; CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH �`� �� --I,-- . io r--= _________________ —' � ~` (CUP)2000-00002 . I ANZEN _________________ -� — T � �� I -- i--�� I � . ' , � <^ � , I �� m � � �. w� � � � � -- >- �.�, I I ��l'iEIA/�TE�ft _ _ VIEW TEl I ! � � � � � _ � I � J �--L _��EZ�sr � i J� _CAZlIER6liRY�L1._. - - -- - I I I � I � SUBJECT SIT � - � � ; I �� , ; W � I _ � ; � ! , � � � n -I--�-I � � , . � � ' N R K �-� ; � i � W � � � � I 0 100 200 30�a00 500 Feat � ¢ I . �' t"=g7B leet �� B � � _ , � � � �B ___�� - - -� -__ _ _ _ . � - _-�� _ _ ' � � m � I� City of rigard � I��II��]�] m m �°�'TE_�B,—��; _ ,_ ,,--; �-�-�.�LJ � — � -�� i I�� In(ormalion on this maC is lor penerai lo.at�on only antl i ' I � � should De venfstl w�tn tne Dave�opmant Servius D�vlsion � � � , � 13t25 SW H�u BNd ------- �SW-PEpPESIBEELN ---' Tigard.OR 97227 .'I �- -' � (503)639-4171 y p — _.'�__. .— .__ .___'_._._._. . __. ....___..._ �__'.___�_ __I�._.__PIOt� __�__ http:I/www.cl.Lgartl or us I Communit Develo ment date:May 17,2000; C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � cm or no�iro ��d-„= �� -- .,a.,e o0,1,.� ---± � � —�'—�---- , � �oo I ,.�- i �,Q� �� ^°a� � _ ._,� ; .�,� I , ; -------------'- -------- !- ----�,t�-�--��'_------'�C�-------�-- ---------- I , e�.�r*s, .-,,� � �, o � ,j. � +--w..�F.c q�sarn. ,�T� � ! �� . I � e ctre✓Ywd �'^,.' �� — ----- (__. `, I � , � i' Fu✓*r ��i� � �� ' mIf NyiM s.�e.-.,� az.�z..aY �n.rc_�.,.�..) �E,� �.,��,...,ose� e.�n.,c, u...ox.we �ts.�T�..x, I 4--�- ►R�e� � �'z . w�2-4r„�,u.1 ��..o :��wc�a � : . cu.wuw1 �. ____.___._...__. 'S ..-o ^.-+c.�e . v- , � � '�'��-�-- �� - -- --•o � �� _ � I ° I � ,1 � �- i `0 � � I `° �, � i i ., I I i ' _ ! ' a SM.wF� � __ , � r�.,�,� �..� �: � � , � �� .�� ; °o�a ��,.� �' �- - � - . 1 � I �� , , a a �.,,,u . � = I �� ' . I I� � —�=N4v I.ODi � � �r �i� uDMiN 4 „I � �t '� �;J D1 K i0'b' 1 �I . ��. . p�' , . � T . � ' '_'"'_ `�L.rierr�.x.PMen ;I ,�� ,I� I i / __ �4 I .�..o ..�Y i � -.k �«.,�„� , , _ Jp,. I�� ' ; � � �.�......._ ' � �I� I�' GwiesRiar, � �.�(ia��,.�rzie:f J � TRs•�L'. uT �7 .', I � x�� _ � _ .�� ,w,a,,.� __, �-P.,_� ,� ; , —' _ .� � .�I � _ �— � � � __ � � -� ��' i �.� _ = � � ' � �s�u �r _ ��, �! jd �L �;�� . //� / �\\\`�\ I i i _ � i -�,�� —� „�� \ � 6+lb-�UCa Gh.V�w� 1 � • �;r�� .�. �� , � , [�¢U1 W�.CIr�G �- '�, �I,i .•--r--.. �71nO iao2�M � � �� / �/'7' � � � t ...�oc il v. �- � / -,�`- �.dcx�e0 ml � � �� / ��/i/I \\��\�� i�� / I �994 '� �\ �� .. �`.-. � � f � /. � � - �/;/i�� -a �� f y'� � � t' ' \ -- ��'/%j i _ � � �� _ '��,' ': ' WG/Ti.�b vRTdG'.Yrft4 :� � �� `� -� \n � . A C1�'rRNTeW ,�`y� `✓ ` ; P..�...r , , �. "� . ,,, � / �er.�rn.,� J , � . i / a �.k.G Nbrf� �' r � I :" � ��vMMLG S��i� . ' I / _� // I // � 6 �_..-.....__. I '...� /J . I ____ � � . .� ��____/ ___ _____' -___"_"_ �_' // � - _ �_ �_- - - -�`--J� ll ��6L.� H;5^. G � O,��p\vyy G/i+vGYMI� __ -_.' ._-_ _'__ ...._____"_....."'_'__. '__-"'__'___' ' __ ..__'__ '_�. _ '_-_'—._'_ __.__""—_"'_.'_"'_ . .-t r S. \V GANT�2��Z�f L..MrJr' ��5'rH �I'7� P�-� � • PROI°os�p AbbI710h� • 1�� 20 ' i Cjl� QF TIGARD � CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION i SITE PL.Al�t � (CUP)2000-00002 (Map is not to scale) ____`________________________________ NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEh. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community�Deve(opment S�urpingA BetterCommunity CITY OF TIGARD PUBLICHEARINGNOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. JUNE 26, 2000 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 FILE TITLE: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION APPLICANT: Calvin Presbyterian Church OWNER: Same Ray Beyer 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S1116C, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE - REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY C�UNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDEt, _ IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION _3S THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER JULIA POWELL HAJDUK AT (503) 639-4171, x407 TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. � � > �__ � _ m �- ._. ^ . ��..�...._ ......-,,..,��. �- - -!- _ . �. _ McDONALD , ST � � . �V 1 i r__�p ' i .. .r VICINITY MAP / I ST - . l u -___:-�_: . _ CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH o° � �1� I I---�'_ i� 2 — —�"�. �cuP�zooa-0000z=== , . , . � ; � �ANZEN � � ; � �� _ — - — -- cr � /� � � i �— � / J t_�_____ . I � /I=- JI �___T� : i�_�_ '..W ,�– �__�� — I I . . � '-- - ' , � �- _ _ � ! i � �� y. . . .. . .� .U. . �� _ �m � � w� ��+� �� 1;A -- �.__ — �!�lN7E�2R-i. - � �--, ._ . .VIEWTEI ;; r�� . ; i �, � � . . . . � _ � I .i. _I� .I � INEZ S � �� ___' _ �_-1- 1 _ _�� J �J f., � � � � �_ � �� -� __ r,�wTERBURYLN_-SUBJECTSITE� o '_. •-�! —_ �,-'--� �� J PEMBRpOK 5. --� ---��— i , . . - -�y�' ��i� � r _ , . � _ � -' ,�� i i � --' I � ( �---- ��"' �'� � 1 � , . ' . MURDOCKST �— -� �.. . � N `^ r-- -� -- . - -—— . MURDOCK - ST �� ' -- Y�.�?- , --)/ , � �.<� , - , . r- j>, '�� _ __ �_—__� ry a, � ]re�a� r �K;�Ii��r;7 � � jr � � wj � � 'i'' !$ ,W � Q �qj � ��` � �� e I � � � �JG�j � - , ,.DELMONTE DR � ' � c��y�,r r�� i � . _ � � , , _ a .�.ea..« ��,_._.� - ��s sw•�b� - �, ��°�EA TNEE lH 1ipq.pl 9)}3J � 50]16]9.��1� . . �. . _ _ . . . . . . ci�yroar� Communily Development Plot aale May 17,2000�.C�.VnagicWIAGIC�3 APR CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OfFICER CITYOFTIGARD �'ommunity�DeveCopment JUNE 26� 2�� - 7:00 PM S�iapingABetterCommunity AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 �ALyIN PRESB_Y_TE.EiIANSdUHCH ADDITION___ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2000-00002 The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,610 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: I 0445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S I I I BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.145, 18.755, 18.165, 18.190, 18.195, and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFfICER PAGE 2 Of 2 6/26/2000 PUBl1C HEARING AGEHDA CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER JUNE 26, 2000 — 7:00 PM TOWN HALL TIGARD �ITY HALL, 1 3 12S SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 . .a.+'rryr,.l.^'r-�„+.c�.�.�. . r.,_ �r.sr.o. -s.�. . . . E,.,.r'r.w.3.� a °a.-✓.w. ....... . w. ..-x. . .nP , ..:x�rr+,i.srw.... . .-. . . .r.,rA'r'.r.�i.►iI�/Ir.+r�...:. fF � % _ � An one wishin to s eak on an a enda item must % a � y g P g , . " sign-in on the appropriate sign-in sheets. ; � ,, �ar,..r. ..rr�,r+'rr.e��ee.c--.r�r..r.+t�.F-...,�'�,+-�e..a�.ra�rrrr:+,g.�^-,-r�..r�,.��.x,+a. . . n,+.�fr.��-ev�..w'm-s�+'.aw.rr�r�.:�.,w.w..r.t,rr.+..�.�aw�.i'-rr-wnF:r�:a�"'d�er-w>a►:►r.►iAri�ir.�q►iriwA►i�I PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deafl. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech ar hearing im�airments; and ➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important ta allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above if you are requesting such services. (OVER FOR HEARING AGENDQ ITEM(S) CIiY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFIfER PAGE I OF 2 6R6/2000 PUBLIf HEARING AGENDA 1 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: June 26.2000 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD Coirtmurrity�DeveCopment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �S(t°piiigABetterCommunity 120 DAYS = 9/11/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2000-00002 APPLICANT/ Calvin Presbyterian Church ARCHITECT: Robert Gray Partners, Inc. OWNER: Attn: Ray Beyer Attn: Russell Leach 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 1000 Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ' ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5, low-density residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 1 OF 15 6/28/20�OPUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � THE FOILOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE ANDlOR BUILDING PERMITS: Planning Conditions: 1. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of this addition. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. � 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion or an acceptable alternate will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Planning Conditions: 4. Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. In addition, the remainder of the parking area shall be re- striped to provide more visible pavement markings. 5. All site improvements must be made in accordance with the approved plans. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: Based on information obtained in past decisions, the original sanctuary building was constructed in 1965 and was subsequently remodeled in 1972 and 1982. In 1992, approval was granted (CUP 92-00001) to add a new Narthex, fellowship hall and classroom addition. In 1994, approval was granted (CUP 94-0004) to construct a new 9,700 square foot sanctuary, add parking and modify the driveway location. Vicinity Information: The site is bordered on the north and west by property zoned and developed R-3.5. To the east and south are streets, with R-3.5 zoning across the street. Also, across the street is the John Tigard House. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a church facility constructed in several phases over the past 30 years. The proposal is to construct a 16,670 square foot addition that will house classrooms, a multipurpose rooms and accessory spaces. The applicant is not proposing to add any additional parking spaces to the site, because the sanctuary (which is how parking requirements are calculated) is not proposing to be enlarged. The parking is currently non-conforming because the standards have changed since the last approval in 1994. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 2 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � SECTION IV. DECIaION MAKING PROCEDURES, PCr2MITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 �sts the Use ategories. The applicant is proposing to build a multi-purpose room with classrooms and kitchen facilities associated with the existing church use. The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the R-3.5 zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) is a major modification to a Conditional Use permit which is a Type Ilf-HO decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria ( eneral Approval riteria) (Additional Conditions of Approval) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 �Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810� E. Impact Studx SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND �INDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the �urpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.OZO.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as reg ulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 3.5 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc., and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 3 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, � location, topog�aphy, and natural features; The site is already developed with the church facility. The area of expansion does not require the removal of trees, parking, etc and appears to be suitable for the expansion. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-3.5 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for Religious Institutions specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD R-3.5 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq ft. 20,000 sq.ft 3.5 acres Minimum Lot Width 65/90 ft. SAME AS R-3.5 295 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft 25 ft 30 ft(no change) Side facing street on corner 8 through lots 20 ft 20 ft 235 ft Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 68 ft(no change) Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 45 ft Maximum Height 45 ft. See note[1] 38 ft.approx. Maximum Site Coverage[2] ---- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] Minimum Landscape Requirement ---- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] [1] Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of 6uilding height over 45 feet. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surtaces. [3] The proposed addition will be located where there is existing asphalt,therefore,there will be no net increase or decrease in impervious surface or landscaping. As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone and Conditional Use standards are met. - The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.39b Decision Making Procedures;18.510, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Stora e; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and �8.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this repo�t. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Reg ulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 4 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The use will comply with ��e applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use. ection 18.330.030. states that the Hearings Aut ority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facifities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this addition above and beyond what currently exists. In addition, because the area of expansion will bring an outdoor play area, indoors, the noise level will decreased. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the expansion area will comply with the height requirements and the location is in accordance with the setbacks. Because of this, an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; A condition is not necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, there is no change in the parking or access and no increase in vehicle trips to the site. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; As discussed further in this report, additional right-of-way is not necessary and, therefore, need not be required as part of this approval. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; There is an existing buffer with landscaping along the property boundaries. A site visit by staff revealed that tre landscaping along the northern property line is minimal and does not include shrubs that were shown on the 1994 expansion plans. The 1994 plans showed a hedge of Fraser Photinia installed along the fence line. A condition of approval is recommended requiring the applicant to re-install this landscaping (or similar hedge) along the fence line where previously shown. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been proposed. Because the use is existing, it is expected that the existing signs will remain, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that a change in signage is desired in the future. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 5 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensiry of outdoor lighting; • The lighting is not proposed to be altered as a result of this expansion. There are no known compfaints regarding lighting from adjacent property owners, therefore, staff finds that existing lighting levefs, as previously approved, do not impact adjacent properties. Because no change is proposed in the lighting, no additional conditions of approval are necessary. Reguiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; As previously discussed, the applicant should be required to install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 approval. No additional buffering and screening is necessary provided the applicant comply with screening previously approved. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Fences are existing and are adequate. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas, or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrianlbicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the followin� condition is warranted by this Conditional Use approval. Any other conditions listed above are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere in this report. CONDITION:Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provi�de the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed befinreen new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway, which does not cross the parking lot or access way, which will also serve the area of expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 6 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Re9uired walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and As stated above, the walkway does not cross the parking lot or accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkwaXs shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted andlor signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The existing walkway is paved with concrete, thus satisfying the criteria. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The proposal does not increase parking requirements, therefore, this criterion does not apply. In any event, the site has one, 24-foot-wide and one, 30-foot-wide access into the site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are satisfied. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development pro ects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accor�ance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are existing, therefore, this standard has been met. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. The proposed expansion is in a residential zone and abutting residential uses on all sides. While the site is not classified as a residential use, it is not a use listed in the buffer matrix requiring screening from adJ�acent residential uses either. In any event, the site has an existing 20-foot buffer along the north property line and a 13-foot buffer along the east property line. As discussed previously in this report, the applicant must install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 land use approval for the sanctuary expansion. To the south and east are streets. The proposed expansion is taking the place of an existing asphalt play yard and will have a landscape stnp installed around fhe perimeter of the addition. Because the formal buffer is conditioned to come into compliance with the previous approval and the addition will provide additional landscaping around the penmeter of the building, no additional buffering or screening is needed. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 7 OF 15 6/28/2400PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Screening Special Prov�sions: � Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There is no change to the parking or existing parking lot screening, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Off-Street Parkin� and Loadinq (18.765): Disa le - ccessib e ar cing: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site has 8 ADA spaces marked on-site, whereas, only 6 are required based on the number of parking spaces provided over the entire site. Access Drives: With re ard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street �o off-street�arking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow o traffic and provicfe maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface• and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsec�ion 18.810.030.P, groups of iwo or more parking spaces.shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All of the access drives are existing and are not proposed to be modified, therefore, this standard does not apply. _ Parkin Lot Strip ing: . Excep��for singfe-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the ofif-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter.shall have all parking spaces clearfy marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking is existing. A site visit revealed that the existing striped parking is very faint and is in need of re-striping. As will be discussed further in this report, the applicant will need to re-stripe some of the parking .spaces to provide for 7 more parking� spaces. Staff recommends that the entire parking lot be re-striped at that time. It is stafif's understanding that this is planned by the Church, however, a condition is necessary to insure that this is accomplished. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel sto at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. �e front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 8 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The parking lot and lanascape areas are existing and are not proposed to be aitered, therefore, this standard does not apply. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. While the parking is existing, the applicant will be re-striping some of the parking to create compact parking spaces and make up for 7 spaces that will be removed as part of the expansion. The applicant has provided staff with a re-striping plan that shows the parking re-striped to provide for 32 compact parking spaces at 7.5 feet in width. The standard spaces will continue to be 8.5 feet wide or larger. The existing access aisles will not be altered. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional si�ns shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There is an existing bicycle rack that must be relocated because it is in the area of expansion. A condition is necessary that the applicant submit a revised plan that shows the new location in accordance with the standards in Section 18.765.050. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/Z feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicre parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for �equired bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There is an existing bicycle rack on-site, therefore, the detail of the bicycle rack is not applicable. The location will have to be revised as discussed and conditioned previously in this report. Minimum Bicycle Parkin� Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area, however, because the applicant is not revising the main assembly area, no additional bike parking is required. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 9 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Table 18.765.2 states that �he minimum pa�lcin for a Religious institution is one (1) space for � every finro (2) seats. The existing sanctuary sea�s 500, therefore, current standards require 250 parkin� spaces. The applicant has indicated that there are 150 parking spaces on-site. Based on review of the last CUP approval for the site; however, there were 169 spaces proposed (only 94 were required), 9 of which were in the vicinity of the expansion. A site visit confirmed that there are seven spaces that will be removed in the area of expansion. Because the parking is currently non-conforming, approval can not be granted for any development that increases the non-conformity. By removing spaces, the non-conformity is increased. Staff contacted the applicant's representative who reviewed the site and determined that the existing standard parking spaces could be re-striped to provide some compact spaces. By re-striping some of the parking, 7 additional spaces can be picked up. The applicant has provided staff with a plan that shows this is possible and feasible. Based on this, a condition is necessary that requires the applicant to re-stnpe the parking lot in accordance with the plan submitted to staff on 6-14-2000 to provide 32 compact spaces with a net increase of 7 spaces within the main parking lot area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces. . Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. . Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. Tree Removal — Cha ter 18.790 ection 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan fo� the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. not a pplicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does Pp Y� FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists from the street center line grade except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 10 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER - C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site DeveloQment Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sect�ons. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibili� Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 �Parkin�); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.09 15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.Og0.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Relationshi to the Natural and Ph sical Environment: ui ings s a e: oca e o preserve ex�s ing trees, topography and natural draina�e where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subjec to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between ad'oining ,buildings for adequate light air circula�ion, and fire-fi hting; and oriented wi�h consideration for sun and wind �rees shall be preserved to�he extent ossible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree �emoval. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the ex pansion area in a location that will not require the removal of trees, does not decrease the bu�Fers and does not remove parkin . Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division and will be reviewed�urther as part of the building permit review. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safetv: . Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; . Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by ofhers; . Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; . The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the-angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and . Li gh-t fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular tra_ffic and in potentialfy dangerous areas sucFi as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficienf to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this pro'ect and has not indicated concern of objection with the proposal. Staff, therefore, interpre�s that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the crime prevention standards have been met. Public Transit: rovisions wi in the plan_shall be included for providing for transit if the development prop osal is adjacent to existin or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: t�e location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths fo the shelters. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 11 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The site has frontage on oW Canturbury Lane and SW 10s Avenue, both of which are greater than '/4 mile from the nearest tri-met route, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810: hapter 18.810 provi es construction stan ar s or the imp ementation o pu lic and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Street And Utility Im�rovements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction stan ar s or th mie plementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot �ight-of-way width and 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of- way width and 24 to 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a minor collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on this street. No additional dedications are required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved to City standards. No additional improvements are necessary. SW 103`d Avenue is also fully improved adjacent to this site, inside of a 50-foot ROW. No additional ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage A�ency in 1996 and including any future revisions o� amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCN EXPANSION/CUP2040-00002 PAGE 12 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . This site is presently serv�,., from the City's public sewer syste�... The new building addition will be served from the existing onsite private lines. No additional public line work is necessary. Storm Draina e: eneral Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states �equires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Consfruction Standards for Sanitary and Surtace Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site presently accommodates any upstream surface water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction prog ram resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City wifl require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Even if the building was to be located in an area that was previously landscaped, the new building addition would be adding approximately 4,356 square feet of new impervious area. Any additional areas under 5,000 square feet are considered insignificant and, therefore, do not necessitate the installation of an onsite detention system. Utilities: - Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above �round, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,600 volts or above, and: . The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; . The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; . All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and . Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-groundin� costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 13 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilifies. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. Overhead utility lines on both streets have been previously addressed by the applicant. No additional work is necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY ANDIOR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPR VEME TANDARD : Public Water S stem: his site is presenty served from the City's public water system. The new building addition will be served from the onsite private lines. No additional public water line work is necessary. Storm Water Quality: The ity has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations establisfied by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. There are two existing onsite water quality swales that were constructed with an earlier phase of this project. The project engineer, Tom Sisul, submitted a letter, dated April 24, 2000, that explains that there is enough capacity in the existing swales to accommodate the additional impervious area. Therefore, no additional water quality facilities are necessary. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. - FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have been met outright and no further conditions are necessary. E. IMPACT STUDY: ection 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system andty pe of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the im�act of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertx interests, the applicant sfiall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has provided an impact study which indicates all necessary improvements will be made. The applicant is not increasing the number of trips, therefore, a TIF will not be required and there are no required improvements or dedications for this expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 14 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER ' SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: . Site requires 3 fire hydrants. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comment: . A new double check valve device assembly (backflow protections) is required to be installed directly behind the existing water meter to meet current requirements. The City Police Department and The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this repo�t. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met and US West were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. � '� June 15, 2000 PREPARED . Julia adjuk DATE Associate Planner ; ,_,lG�.�� 2��t�"�'�," ,� ' � June 15. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard B ersdo DATE Planning Manager i:\curpinljulialcup\Calvin Presbyterian.doc CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 15 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER — � —T---- �— � �_ ' � ' ='E� m � ' `' '—..'�---� i� �EO�A.>�.� �w�oR,,.. o� s D NALD C�Rp� U � � � I I ! VICINITY MAP "'' — CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ST ��°,� _ �ph �— q �_ o --� 'i _________________ i � � �� ' (CUP)2000-00002___ ANZEN ----------------- � _ � CT �� I -- i � � _ �� - � �� < � 'c�; m � � �ti � i w , I __ j, �! �, , , �LiEW_TErRft.� VIEW TEl _�___ . I ! i i ____ — -- - , � � � --- �--._._.�_JdEZ-ST T I JE � ANT � I - � � I �'�� SUBJECT�SIT � , , m w � �, ,I J , � �; I i� � . � � ! ' mID _ �_� --- .-- -- � � li . i N R K � � — W � I � 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet = B ¢ I I - - __ � I � 1"=37B/eel �� e � e� I � � �8 � - - � ---- -L=_ � ; � '�L�!_�� -� -- r- - - m � � � � � � � __ Ciry of Tigard � � __—,� L r-�, , �� Infortna6on on thls m�p is tor fleneral location only anE � i ahould be vsnfietl vnt�the Developmanl Sernces Division. - — �__ �� J 1J125 SW Hall Blvd ____. ___ 1 SV1rPEPP .____ � 1!X_ __ Tiqar4 OR 97223 � � i � I ,' --- '� `'•- -- (5031639-�t77 _� . ___' . I i hltplA.w.v.a.Upard.or.us _—��_._——. .—._- _—__._. ... ___ _�. __ . _ . _—_.�_— �_ " _ ____— — _—___._——__ __ . Community Development Ptot date: May 17,2000;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISIONICOMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �,, tm or nouro -:�_ e�'.=�.,^oo,T,----- --� - �. 3:.r.� �, '�� nao ,y"'"' I eeen ,�---� � y - �U I . __�__-__-__�i�� _-�� 1-I� �� }��.��_ �� Pnl1dTMy' .Mr � � ❑ .' ♦ � �•4/.ZICiL QJ1�lN. f L --- — I ---� i ; fr' , e os*vr.a � '' F.c,�.m •n� 'O �aPJT�.Ys V..1o�LwPC �C.��ST�Ufa m IT HiGM i �'T M�6T�1fi � �'bTi�a4 Ti•JlwrrY� i/�Rt�/�w�� NE�v c��.nu04'+I'E i �'.2 . . F+�2-Or 2E.1 f.�ti0 :.CD42�ew�6 � : � CQ.vG��M -_".__"_' �i c„rt.o �w nrrh .�... ..wd .��.,a ,I� . �� ..__�.�____� � _ __. �� . i i.-. ` d � . . i I . , �, • �Il / � � [3--0 Q i - ,0 -� I ee I _,,. _ _ _ -- � . , '4�-- - - i i � � , $ '' . sM.,.�e,z - - -_- . j � ' `1�7T�+K sns�w�.a. L! t � p. � P/�+�..�V(i . � Rwraaa.�o � __ _ " 0�0 . fj b;1�1C S W �) h f I G�a/�.A.J'C�fc 1L � I _ _ i a syCww�,iL d.. ' . � . �I v�.oscwn�lG � I _ - .�;I � NG.V hOOi 1 . , I �II IIII I�I j'.'. !I� iLw4.e � _ IS NOM�R1 - 1 ...I , - 4� i 0'ia' .. I I��I �� S , I �� III ��I �ii,' i� �� ! � ,,�i !S � I j�j j -7 ---- ��d,,,,r�.P,,,,r� j i (,u� �. �,I I I I i 1� .�. _ ..._-_._.•9 I IJ.NOGUPPD � ��.. I �O' _ ' , I µ -- FS.« ` �'s .-1� .Ys �+T __ fo�Ie�n 'f n4a I TC�� 111 ier1 % � t.^.r..e�nw�G� ` y L�r�._:.JP. � .I as� �, -'__ '� - I��I'. __� �..�.- - � i I '�� -- - ' �--`-- � - �- � "' _ - �� NI � �� I c.n.�s � , r� ,n ' �� rsr�nr.l. i�i `��\ ! �n ��\ �„ � vi�� — �� i � I �/ � � � � �/ = \��\� � I � 0 �' /�/ / ,'w. �� Bkb-wG GN-V��I _ '� �� /; /��',:�f�,` �,�� C+waUf W�r�b �'I I _ � -,,,, �'il . � J�TmO Gbfcr,w.l � .,�..._,r lj� � ti�! � �� \,��V �� .' ��/ //� � i9�.�+ncls0 m1 � �� . �o� I �� "�� — '� ;;>.,%,�e I � „ � �, � <,.,� - � '� i �y li . ��`r �'%� � I �; - � i��%� � �i �� werr,�a. - I �,�j � � ,� - �/ `� _� �v�. . �Treww q,+++t`! . i A c7a-r/t�r'rarJ , ��d . 1 �\.J�/,. �/� �� o � � a.s�..rTr ! i� ', � ra�Hsti^s I , �I� •j ... . ¢ '�I /� �..n.r+L s.�aau) I . '� _� I � � ___"_"'I� �— _� � -- '__I.__ .,_._ ____. _-.—_ � : // -__ ^-�_ ��___ '-_ ---�� .. y1��6:��.�4 br5^ . qrpuaww crs�vGVMI. . '___-._ '_.-._. .__._ _'__-____ _.'_"_ . . __.-_�___ .....--_ ""_'_-"'_" "__.. ._._....__'__-_ .._"__—__'-_ ._...__'__..."' _'._"__"_.'_'"" .. *. S. \V GANT�2P'b�ZY �-kN P' ' rI� �TH �I'T� P L-A I�I • P I2 O I°O�✓L p A b b I T I O I� ' I��' 2 0 � � � QF TIGAR � CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION '� CI D ' SITE P�.AN � (CUP)2000-00002 (Map is not to scale) _____________________________________ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community,UeceCopment S(apingA Better Cotnmunity DATE: May 1T,2000 Q�t1}RQ� 3't1C,K�a� RECEIVEDPLANNING T0: -�De�e�F,US West Communicatlons FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Division MAY 3 0 2000 STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Naiduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGqFip Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 ➢CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CNURCH ADDITION� The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Slte Plell,Viciniql Map and ApplicanYs statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: lUI1C 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You ere un8ble t0 respOnd bY t11C eb0ue dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: L�'=TS �� t.t S �.��s T T��2�0..►�,2_.�� (�'lease provicCe tke fofl'owing info»nation�Name of Person[sl Commenting: � cN�29 �'�}c�S4� Phone Number[sl: S o 3 - a z- �s�'� CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ♦ / REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�I�e�ceCopment S(api�tgA�etterCornmunity DATE: M8Y 11,2000 �1 T0: lohn Roy,Properpl Manager/Operations Department � RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Di�ision �JI AY 1 8 2000 STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Naiduk,Associate Planner ��r r o�riGARo Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-)291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 ➢CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CNURCN ADDITIONG The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the SItC PI811,YlCllllty Mep elld AppI1Ce11Ys StetCmCllt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: lune 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If]lou are unable to respond by the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ��We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: ��Ylease prvrn�e the foll"ounng infornration)Name of Person[sl Commendng: Phone Number[sl: CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITV OF TIGARD �'ammunity�Ue�veCopntent S�apingA BetterCo�nrnunity DATE: May11,YOOO RECEIVED PLANNING T0: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer ��IAY 1 8 2000 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Diuision crrr ofi rr�ARo STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [5031684-1297 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 ➢CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITIONQ The applicant has requested Conditiona� Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the SItC Plell,VICIIII[y Mep elld AppllCellt's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: 11111C 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You ere u118b1e t0 reSp011d by the ab0ue dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (�lease pravi�e tke foClowing inforniation�Name of Person[sl Commenting: 1_ ,.101� V �IV Phone Number[sl: x aa0 CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�l�c�cclapmerrt S�apingA Better Com�nunity DATE: May17,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING 1D.✓ �,��-. Michael Miller,Utllities Manager M AY 3 0 2000 _ FRe1M:`-� City of Tigard Planning Diuision Cli'Y OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 ➢CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION� The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the SI[C Plell,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: 10nC 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y0118rC u118b1c t01'CSpond by the eboYC datC, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our o�ce. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: A- ,�i�i„� �aue � ,kE�.� ,��a�� ,�� >c-.�r,�_;�T�/JC.�GFLOb✓ �/Lo7EGT)r�IJ� fs �E�u,:cf� T fiF /�uS»-u�rL �2E[�'w RE�ii�rn Ti� �x�Sri�vG MET�'n_ lw.vr��_ % MEE r C�.r�22�Ksr gF��rtE,�V1£.�vT f (�Please pravufe tke foCCawing info�mation�Name of Person[sl Commenting: �� /!%�-- PhoneNumqer[sl: ,�3�;� CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • a h REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community,[�e�c�e(�pment S�apingA Better Community DATE: MaY 17,2000 � � � C,� r7 �r � (�� .� T0: lulia Huffman,USA/SWM Program \ Mq y , `� � , FROM: Ciiy of Tigard Planning Diuision 8 8 �� .�' '+�� y� �J STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner `� ^ Phone: [503]639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 rCALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CNURCH ADDITION� The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Slte Plell,Vicini�Map and ApplicanYS StBtCmCllt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: lune 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. ff]lou are unable to respond b]I the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. � Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: �4'lease provufe the foli"ounng information�Name of Person[sl Commentln� . 1..� S L� �, Phone Number[sl: ,�� —� �_ g— CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 2000 TO: Julia Powell Hajduk, City of Tigard � FROM: Julia Huffman, USA v�, SUBJECT: Calvin Presbyterian Church Addition, CUP 2000-00002 On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordar.ce with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to u�hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. • Provide data that the existing water quality facility has the capacity to accommodate the increase in impervious area. EROSION CONTROL A joint 1200-C erosion control permit may be required. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 � REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITY OF TIGARD �'ommunity•Dei'elopnrent S�aping�BetterCommunity DATE: May 1),ZOOO RECEIVED PLANNING T0: 6arf1 lampella,Building Official MAY 1 9 2000 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Di�ision cirr oF TiGARD STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Nalduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4171/fax: [5031684-129] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 �CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCN ADDITION� The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: lune 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate ietter to return your comments. If you are unable to respand by the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. u Written comments provided below: �\ S�k� �E c��.,��S ? F,�� 1-1��--� (2lease pravi�e the foCCowing infornration�Name of Person[sl Commendng: SC! 1 �.J Phone Number[sl: �.=� CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS � MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: June 12, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer ��`� RE: CUP 2000-00002, Calvin Presbyterian Church Addition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of- way width and 24 to 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a minor collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on this street. No additional dedications are required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved to City standards. No additional improvements are necessary. SW 103rd Avenue is also fully improved adjacent to this site, inside of a 50-foot ROW. No additional ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 2000-00002 Calvin Presbyterian PAGE 1 Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. This site is presently served from the City's public sewer system. The new building addition will be served from the existing onsite private lines. No additional public line work is necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.510.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site presently accommodates any upstream surface water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 2000-00002 Calvin Presbyterian PAGE 2 Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The new building addition will be adding approximately 4, 356 square feet of new impervious area. Any additional areas under 5,000 square feet are considered insignificant and therefore do not necessitate the installation of an onsite detention system. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. ��?�� Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, �xcept for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 2000-00002 Calvin Presbyterian PAGE 3 temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; � All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. Overhead utility lines on both streets have been previously addressed by the applicant. No additional work is necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPRQVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water Svstem: This site is presently served from the City's public water system. The new building addition will be served from the onsite private lines. No additional public water line work is necessary. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 2000-00002 Calvin Presbyterian PAGE 4 created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. There are two existing onsite water quality swales that were constructed with an earlier phase of this project. The project engineer, Tom Sisul, submitted a letter, dated April 24, 2000, that explains that there is enough capacity in the existing swales to accommodate the additional impervious area. Therefore, no additional water quality facilities are necessary. Gradinq and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. Recommendations: Engineering recommends approval of this CUP. \�tig333\usr\depts\eng\brian rlcomments\cup�cup2000-OOD02.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 2000-00002 Calvin Presbyterian PAGE 5 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS 120 DAYS- 9/71/OO CITY�OF TIGARD �'ommunity�Ue�ieCopment S(apingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD �Nas�ington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FIHAL ORDER BY TNE HEARINGS OFFICER Case�Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 2000-00002 Case Name: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION Name of Owner: Calvin Presb terian Church/Ra Be er Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 10445 SW Canterbu Lane, Ti ard, OR 97224 Address of Property: Same Tax Ma /Lot No.: WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800 A FINAL ORDER IN[ORPORATING THE FA[TS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR fONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL THE [ITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PIANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS fOR THE APPLICATION DESfRIBED IN FURTHER DETAII IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE_ 26, 2000 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DEfISION HAS BEEN BA�ED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONfLUSI0N5 CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. RCQIICSt:—➢ The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. Zones: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. AC[I011: —� ❑ Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial NOtICC: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: � Owners of record within the required distance O Affected governmental agencies 0 The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator � The applicant and owner(s) The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON (INSERT DATE) AND BELOMES EFFECfIVE ON (INSERT DATE) UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard Cit Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Ti ard, Ore on 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON (INSERT DATE). Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP2000-00002/CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER _ �� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community�De�veCopment S(aping,�Better�'ommunity DATE: May 17,2000 T0: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Naiduk,Associate Planner Phane: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-129T CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)2000-00002 ➢CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION� The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the SitC Plell,Vicini�Map and ApplicanYs statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: 11111C 1,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If]lou are unable to respond by the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: ��lease pravufe tke foCfowi'ng informatior�)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: CUP2000-00002 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION AGENCY REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . _.. CI F TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMIV�TS MOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT APPLICATIONS , FILE NO[Sl: �'�►� �� ---^�r� fILE NAME[Sl: , �� f�=��,��, " ��-4-��;; e �,��, ;�l:�r, CITIIEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central ❑ East ❑ South ❑ West ❑ I�.YI Also Place For Review in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Drlpmnt Svcs.iechnicians � POLICE DEPT./Jim Wol(,(rime Prerention Officer �+/BUILDING DIVISION/Gary lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT.Brian Rager,Uvlpmnt Review Engineer " WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/(athy Wheadey,Ciry Remrder ___ OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Praperry Manager ✓ PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL. HILLS PARK&REC. DIST.� � TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE& RESCUE +R TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT � =' UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY � Planning Manager fue Marshall Administrative O(fice Julia Huflman/SWM Program 15101 SW Walker Road Washmgton Counry fire Disuict PO Boz l45 Isf N.Fint Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up 6ox) Beaverton,OR 91D75 Nillsboro,OR 91124 LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN � OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _ IfISh BUnn211,oevewpment Senices PO BOx 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 9y076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,GrowtnManapemernCooMinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP 333 SW First Avenue _ M01 HUIe,GreenspacesCoortlinator(CPA/ZOA) Lefl�l FfellCfl(Comp P�annmenamentsOniy� P�BOX 2946 CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Repional Planner�Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 5W 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY � King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�POwen+nes+nnreal _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue __ CITY OF LAKE 05WEG0 � Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Plannirp Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis�caA� Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Scott King�cPn� _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALI7Y(DEa) ODOT,REGION 1 � _Mike Borreson cE�e��> CITY OF PQRTLAND (NOtiy(or Wellanas antl Potential Envimnmental Impacts) Sonya Kazen,Devebpmem Rev'�ew Coordinator Jim Tice ncn� David Knowles,aia��e��ea�o�� Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section N�b�S> _Steve Conway cce�a�a�.> Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders PI11I HQ2Iy(GeneralApps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Sr.Cartographer�oPa�oA��„ PoRland,OR 97204 _Jim Nims czcn�MS,s _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _Doria Mateja czcn>MS,o Jane Estes,Pe�nn SO��alisl 5440 SW Westgate Drive.Suite 350 h:�patty�masterslRequest For Comments Nohficaaon LisLdoc (Revised�. 21-Apr-OC) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROYIUERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERNlSANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bur�ington NorthernlSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON �TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�a��e.acw�5 o�iy� Pat McGann Of Project is WRhin'/.Mile of A Transil Roule) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 v PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC r/NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY `�GENERAL TELEPHONE � �� US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 PoRland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARDlTUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE�npps.e otHamra.oteew) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 5W Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 +M INDIfATES AllI9tlATIC_N4IIF1(ATION IN(OMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOYERNMENTALAGREEMENT If WITHIN S00'Of THE SUBJECT PAOPERiY FOR ANY/ALL QiY PROJEQS(Project Planner Is Responsi6k For Indinting Parties To Natify�. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! .- - - McDONALD ST � � � � � � - � � � GEDGRRPHIC iNfORM�TiON SYSiE � M I I � ' RoF��, i �� _�.�' � � � ,� � AREA N�TIFIED _ z a i _� � ST� % ~ �w _ ,, S 00' �'� � � �� '° � ) �� ,�o,� � ,o _ �o . �I _ -------------------- � For: Ray Beyer,falvin Presbyterian fhurch f -- - / � I - ,� Re: 10445 Canterbury lane ;i �� ; j i I (2SI IIBC_02800)____________ I � / -- � �---_. .__.. ._._—.-_...... �� _...... . , tS1118801t00 � ' . . . : . � � � � , 2S111B607900 � 251778601800 � ' . . . _ _--.-. ____ ., I . ., � ___ i � � . .� . .... . . . ..... . . fS/718B00900 ' � � tS7T18B01000 �mBB8t1001 , I ' . t51118C03500 ?51116COilOBD-� . . .. . . � ,� I 25iiiBC08U01 �n18C08C�0 . � rn il ii1BC01700 2Sitl8C01500 t31718C09900 25ttICC01600 '�.� tS710�07400 ' � . 1SttlBC032�0 25TTIBC014Y0 --- - tsnau�soo \2� SUB EC ��W TERR zs�neca:9oo 251118C013�0 � SITE zsmecoatoo YSttlBC0�900 �smeconoa tsmecaeioo ! i I i ��G� mnecoasoo tsmecaa�oo :stneca�aooi�necaw�o tsmacmaoe �� :amecooeoa zsrnecoaeoo � � — :smecoosoo 2s�necoo�oa ; isno�ooizoo INEZ ST :snaioomao isimaoonoa : � �� 2snoaoaesao �� , � � j �� . ` tsnoaoosaoe�snoaoomo tsmeca:aoo zanffico:ioosmecatmo� � Q- CANTERBURY 1N = 2E11011DOCl04 :siionoaisaa , tsmecoeeoa '. I— zsnoaooeroo zs�wnooaso2 zsnoaooi7oo YS1118C0Y700 Q' 23110A�01201 � 25/71ACOi707 ' � � iS710AD04100ZSfl0AD01800 � . ' 2Si118COt302'. 131116C00700 i � � � -- � isuoaooaoo� I PEMI tsnanooesoe G�snonooeseo � :snaaooa�oa ��ootsao zsntaco�soo �ecnesaa t5t10110 0 9 6 0 0 ��pp007800 ZS71�8COY600 � I � � :sno�noeon :s�o�uoo �—{—�-- N � YSil0AD09/00 iL110a00Y400 ' tEif�C0t50i '�,, I I 2SIIO�ONlOB t5110�BOt808 � .� t5tt18CB2500 �peCO2�101 .. � iS11WBBt810...` '� .. , I I _ ._..... , __.._ _ ''J— � �—�—:-- MURDOCK ST _ MURDOCK o ,00 zoo 300 ,o0 50o Feet , � i � — - —I i i� � I � 1"=340 feet _ —� —� �LJ —�'W � � — � � � 2 � � � � � , , �-� �1�(]'�-� C° , ' -- � #' • � �Ll-�' i � � � _ 2 � Cityof�l�i�,ird � ;' � � }I�--- o -- �' � � �r � .- , • Q -- �__ I j II Inkrtnation on this map�s for general IocaUOn ony and , � . Q I - shouk be venfied wrth the Developnent Services Dimsion. • ' I I.- . � � . � �� ---- 13125 SW Hall Blvd � �� f-] ��__ � DELMONTE DR � � � � � �� ' r�9a�a,oR s�zzs _ �-!?�� I T �i. � O�. - - (b�N634d171 � �_-� i TT'...J�-I I`. c- ! �__._ .11J � . r� _ LL_._� �__�.�_ � � . .__ I http:% ti.tigarC.or.us Community Development Plot date:Apr 20,2000;C:lmagicVNAGIC03.APR � p��- � ot �.� ) , _ 2S111BC-01300 2S110AD-03200 BAILEY AUNDRIA E BROWN MICHAEL J 10150 SW VIEW TERRACE 10627 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-03600 2S 110AD-01800 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND BROWN SCOTT C&PEGGY L JODETTE SUGDEN 14630 SW 106TH AVE 1Q430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-07000 2S1118C-01400 BAUMAN C WAYNE BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L MARY 10145 SW VIEW TER 10270 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110AD-04204 2S 110AD-03900 BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A BURKS GILDA M&CHARLES C 1450 S KIHEI RD C205 14655 SW 106TH AVE KIHEI, HI 96753 TIGARD,OR 97224 S110AD-04204 2S110AD-02810 B ENDT R T F AND SHARON A CAGLE THOMAS E 1450 S I RD C205 PO BOX 26 I, HI 9 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 110AD-02310 10AD-02800 BENZ FRED S CA THOM PO BOX 230029 PO BO TIGARD,OR 97281 T TIN,OR 62 OAD-02300 2S110AD-09400 BENZ CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO 23002 BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC ARD,OR 97281 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-03800 110AD-09500 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS CAL HILL HOMEOWNERS SOC 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST BY STAN INS B INC TIGARD,OR 97224 8459 S LVD TLAND,OR 972 2S 111 BC-02900 110AD-09600 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L CAL ILL HOMEOW RS ASSOC TRUSTEES BY STAN AD LDER INC 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE 8459 S BUR VD TIGARD,OR 97224 P TLAND,OR 9722 2S 111 BC-00200 S 110AD-01200 BOGERT MARK H AND CA Y HILL HOMEOW S ASSOC MARY E BY STA (I DER INC 14445 5W 100TH &459 S B D TIGARD,OR 97223 TLAND,OR 97223 2S110AD-00510 2S111BC-03007 COLE DONALD R&NANCY A DUNKLEE JOHN 8 MARGARET 11225 SW CHICKADEE TERRACE 10440 SW VIEW TERR BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-00300 2S 110AD-03300 CONRAD EVELYN A EDWARDS LINDA L 10631 SW CANTERBURY LANE 10633 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 10AD-00310 2S 110AD-04202 CON VELYN EWING DOREEN L TR 10631 SW BURY LANE 14625 SW 106TH T ,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1116C-02503 2S110AD-04202 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K EW DO L TR 9750 SW INEZ 14625 06TH TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 24 2S 17 OAD-02010 2S 117 BB-01200 CRIST DAVID L&BARBARA A FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET A 14672 SW 106TH AVE 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-02000 2S 111 B C-03700 CRI AVID L BARA A FAIRLEY RONALD S&KAREN S 14672 S TH AVE 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE D,OR 9 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02401 2S 111 BC-02300 CROSS ROGER K III 8 CLARE E FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14530 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 710AD-03400 2S 110AD-08600 DANIEL SUSAN J FISHER ELEANOR 10639 SW MURDOCK ST 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-02100 2S 17 OAD-03700 DREYER JOAN C FORD ROBERT D AND 14678 SW 106TH AVE GENEVIEVE V TIGARD,OR 97224 14677 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110AD-0211 D 2S 110AD-047 00 DR JOA C GALYEN SUSAN E 14678 6TH AVE 14641 SW 106TH AVE T RD,OR 224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01700 2S OAD-04201 GARRISON PATRICIA L TR IRWI ORENE 14620 SW 106TH AVE 14635 6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 224 2S 111 BC-02700 2S 117 B C-03300 GLEAVES GREGORY L&JONETTE JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 10380 SW CANTERBURY LN SUE ANN TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 5W VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 B C-03400 2S 111 B C-01100 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND KARPSTEIN GREGORY A& BETTY JEAN KARPSTEIN BRIAN A& 10405 SW VIEW TERR. ELLERMEIER JEAN TIGARD,OR 97223 10220 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 zs 1 t t BC-oasoo zs t t t BB-oi�o0 GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS 17580 SW 131ST AVE 14259 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-01900 2S 111 B B-00900 HAASE JOHN G KA L CHARL &MARY J TRS 14666 SW 106TH AVE 14259 S TH TIGARD,OR 97224 D,OR 24 2S 110AD-01910 2S 110AD-00610 H J G KOMER DAVID E& 146 06TH AVE ROBERTS LISA A GARD,OR 24 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 17 OAD-01500 110AD-00600 HADLEY MICHAEL F KO R DAVID 1a540 SW CANTERBURY LN ROBE A TIGARD,OR 97224 10625 TERBURY LN ARD,OR 97 zs>>>ss-o i soo 2s>>>ac-o2i o0 HEISE NANON L ESTATE OF LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J BY MONICA HEISE 10090 SW INEZ 14245 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 B C-04500 2S 110AD-00400 HENERY JOSEPH J 8 LONG S CAROLYN E3ACCELLIERI FRANCES D 10629 SW CANTERBURY LN 1070D SW BEAV-HLSDL HWY#585 TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S110AD-04201 AD-00410 IRWIN LORENE A LONG N 14635 SW 106TH AVE 10629 C ERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 972 2S 110AD-02700 2S 111 B C-02500 LYNCH DORIS M MILROY JOHN T AND SHIRLEY 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 1102 NW SPRINGBROOK RD STE 251 TIGARD,OR 97224 NEWBERG,OR 97132 2 110AD-02710 2S 111 BC-01500 LYN DORIS MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 10579 RDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR ARD,OR 9 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-03100 2S 110AD-00910 MARSH BONNIE S MURPHY KAYE L 10621 SW MURDOCK ST 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00900 2S 1 OAD-00900 MATIAS CATHLEEN F MU Y L 14480 SW 103RD AVE 10619 TERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 T RD,OR 97 2S 111 BC-00700 2S 110AD-00500 MCBRIDE GLEN W&JANET M MYERS CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL 10135 SW INEZ 10627 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 11 OAD-03800 2S 111 BC-03500 MCCABE NANCY MYERS DON ANDREW AND 14661 SW 106TH AVE YVONNE LYNN TIGARD,OR 97224 10445 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-01600 2S110AD-02400 MCMONAGLE PAMELA D NEVAN NICHOLAS AND GLORIA J 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN 10561 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00710 2 110AD-02410 MCPHERSON LINDA D NE NIC S AND GLORIA J 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 1056 URDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 24 110AD-00700 2S 111 BC-02302 MC RSO DA D NOKES JOHN RICHARD&EVELYN J 10623 ANTERBURY LN 14650 SW 103RD AVE RD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-04000 2S1118C-02303 MILLER JUDITH A&PAUL E TRS NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10330 SW VIEW TER 14600 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AA-01500 2S 111 BC-01600 OREGON FOUNDATION INC SARGANT FRANCIS J RUTH 520 SW 6TH 10225 SW VIEW TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S t 1 oAA-o 1400 2S 111 B C-022o0 OREGON FOUNDATION INC SCHMIDT TROY M&SUSAN L 10575 CANTERBURY LANE 10190 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 zs i i i sc-oosoo zs i��sc-oi zoo PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ANNE SEARS ALLEN C 10085 SW INEZ ST c/o WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA TIGARD,OR 97223 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1 t OAD-01010 2S 110AD-02500 POWELL JACQUELINE S SIMONI JANET LEE P O BOX 23322 10567 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-01000 2S110AD-02510 PO L J UELINE S SIM JA LEE p p 2 10567 RDOCK ST ARD,OR 97281 T ARD,OR 9 4 2S 111 BC-02800 2S 110AD-04203 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SMOOLE CHARLENE M CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 14615 SW 106TH AVE 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-03200 2 10AD-04203 PRUETT MARTHA SM CHA M 10335 SW VIEW TERRACE 14615 H AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 RD,OR 972 2S 1 11 BC-03900 2S 711 BC-01700 RAUDY BEVERLY STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10265 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 B B-O 1000 2S 110AD-02600 REEDER MARY R STANLEY CHERIE 14300 SW 103RD AVE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00800 S 110AD-02610 RENICK ALVIN W AND CARLA M ST Y RIE 10175 SW INEZ 10573 RDOCK TIGARD,OR 97223 T RD,OR 97 4 2S110AD-00200 2S1 D-01110 STANSBURY YVONNE THOMP H L&BRANDON M 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10615 S A Y�(2BURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TI ,OR 97224 2S110AD-00210 251118C-02600 BURY NNE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 10633 NTERBURY LN 8841 SW COMMERCIAL T RD, OR 9 24 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-00110 2S111 BC-03700 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE TIMMINS KELLY A&KATHLEEN M 10635 SW CANTERBURY LN 14335 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-00100 2S11186-01900 S N MARIE TPB PROPERTIES& 10635 C ERBURY LN WILLETT ARTHUR P T ARD,OR 972 PO BOX 1775 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 2S110AD-08700 2S110AD-02200 TANNER NANCY TRUSTEE UHIER ANN S& 307 POND RIDGE LN COATES LAURA C UBANA,IL 61801 PO BOX 23042 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 110AD-08801 2S 110AD-02210 TAf�J NAN USTEE UHL NN 5 307 P GE LN COATES RA C NA, IL 61801 PO B 304 ARD,OR 97281 zs�ioA�-oa�oo 25110AD-0080� TA N TRUSTEE WHITMORE DOUGLAS E&GWENDOLYN 307 P DGE LN 14803 SW 106TH AVE NA, IL 618 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-03600 S 110AD-00810 TAYLOR CHARLES C II &AVA C W ORE DOU &GWENDOLYN 14685 SW 106TH AVE 14803 TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 97 2S110AD-04000 257778C-04400 THOMPSON EVELYN M WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L 14647 SW 106TH AVE COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J TIGARD,OR 97223 WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN TRS 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-01100 2S 111 BC-04300 THOMPSON HOILY L&BRANDON M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 FROM : CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN PHONE N0. : 583 683 0703 Apr. 20 2000 09:58AM P1 4 ��,, , � �ra��FA�� ,�;'- u� a� _ F.s °�� ' , �t : � -- � = �',msF�� ,f� \� -� — ��`"'4�e�;� � ,.. _,.. . . � A .R _Y M .. L A W S O N_. p n, S � 0 R Aprii 20, 2000 Patty Lundsford City of Tigard. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax; 684-7297 Ms l,undsford; We have reoeived an incompleteness letter from Julia Hajduk regarding our Conditional Use Permit applicatian (CUP2000-00002) which asks that we have the cify generate two sets of mailing labels for residents within 500 feet of our property, Our property address is 10445 V11 Ca�terb ry Lane, Tigard. �eJ��C�r�CJl O C-C� Please generate these labels, and advise me when they are ready. It is my understanding that v+r� are then to prepare two sets of envelopes with these labels and postage, without return address, anci return them to you. Thenk you for your assistance, and I will look forward to your cail. Sincerety, CALViN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH �� '� �-- � Ray H. 6eyer Church Administrator RHB:rb _ . In your neigl�t�orhood . . . foi you . __ . _.__. TIF?afd. OYf�f�Arl A?��a-ds2� � . «n�� F�a_�� 10445 S.W. Canterburv Lane • " Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:04/20/2000 16:26 User:FRONT Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0001589 Date: 04/20/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 35.00 Name: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Cash: 35.00 Address: Check: 0.00 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Tvne Description Amount RECEXP Recovered Expenditures 35.00 � " � ��S�� . �. � AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD �'ommwiuy�UrveCopment Sliaping/7 BetterCommunity S7A�E O�'01�,EGON ) County of'lNasFiircgton )ss. cicy of�Tigard ) I, �atricia L. Lunsforcf, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Actministrative Specia�ut II for the City of7r�ard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check ADproqiate Box(5)Bebw) 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: G� CUP2000-00002/fAIVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH / 6/26/2000 (Fle No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) - City of Tigard Planning Director � Tigard Hearings Officer = Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council ❑ NoncE oF FINAL ORDER FoR:� I L AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Pudic Heanngs) = City of Tigard Planning Director = Tigard Hearings Officer � Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF. (Type/Kind of Noticej FOR: �� I (File NolName Reference) (Date of Public Hearirg,i(applipble) A copy of the PUBLIC NEARIN6 NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S] of which is attached, marked Exhlbit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Ef(hlblt"B',',.e�, lune 5,2000, and deposited in the United States Mail on lune 5,2000, postage prepaid. � . , r�� '�,�c`l ` �r � ,� (P tMaf are ot' ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the r� day of �S � ��/ , 2000. SHERMAN S. ASPER NOTARY PUBUC-0REGON COMMISSION N0.32340g Nhl Commission Expires: �1�1 /3, ZC��3 MY COMMISSION DCp�RES P�fAY 13,2003 NQTIG�TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN�. .JER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI I��i T .�, THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIOARD Commuriity�DeveCapment ,S6apingA BetterCommunity CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARIHG NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. JUNE 26, 2000 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP)2000-00002 FILE TITLE: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCN A�DITION APPLICANT: Calvin Presbyterian Church OWNER: Same Ray Beyer 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZO N E: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639�171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENC �V SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION , S THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO`TH'E F�UBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER JULIA POWELL HAJDUK AT (503) 639-4171, x407 TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. vJ: �.. F- _ . D � •� ,_ —— _—_ _ _ .... . . _. .- .p � � , _ - ' -- � � �. . .m � . �ioc...xi� xroeun.iax srs�Eu O > � - -. - MFOONALD . ST / I � � - � � } � � � I I ' VICINITY MAP R�P / �' J� , �-i� _ � i � — CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH S), � / �� i , �A ,J I '�� a .-_ o° � ___"-"_ " '__ __� _ � �� (CUP)2000-00002 �� I i� i ' I . �h1A_NZEN =------- - -- -- �—- �� T� � % '� I��I i � �— �� i ' � ix I I ----"' f ��--- -- i �` �- -. � � � �'� — � � � � J---_-- , � , �-� , ; � -- - , � � � �� — � � �; � � ; I � , ��a� ,�, I' \�� I I .� I I mi �I �.-1��-IIr-� I-- - �'m ,. . � � I — — , �:w:� >. / �y�� i i _ - �'-�EW TERR-i - � �� - � i i- � .VIEW TEl � � ��,p�� - � � � _ . I I �� i ' I i--,� �� '---- --. .. _� � NEZ 8T - ,_ I, � I{ --�l— -- �--i i -�I � ��I �, �'��1/ �-, y� /� I LANIERBURY LN._ . `�. --- � - I- . _. �m I� I � SUBJECT SITE� o �' �— � � �_ , _---. '� II .�� - . I —.. PEM@RQOKS'. � � --a� �� i r--_, � � —�--�� - i � p�iu � � r r'--, � , —1 i____ _ — � -�� m �_ ' i � N �� . MURQ4CK_�T r T. .-. - � ..__ -'� --- �T� - � � � 1v1lZRO4�K._ ---- ' � �- _ 1� � = j�y��-� � �� I o ,00 soa 300 .00 soo Feei ,. __ ___��: � � � � �-- � �— � ——��--{ � E ��,a,.�, � i�� a�, � _ _ ' � ~ �-- �'� �;�,��I e��—J=� � - � �—I !—,i � r-�- — -�' � � �N' � I$� �� I�__ � l - � � � � � � -- - ;o � � � Si � � E�R___� j � - ` - -- _ - . Ciry ot Tigurd I`7T' m m '�o' I � �i._, �� _� � � �� , � �. � . ,��.. __�, .. _.ni�rom„w��in�,mav�s m,ea�ma„�o�,Ma.�.�.o� Q n e.vmne hw w.a s< o ., L- _ - i- ..� ---- ---- � . sw'e°nk�7�id,.--. � � a+rro.msoaerxza 1�_ i IL i : i � a.,�� I !_..' ' ..1 . �a�n......aa,a o�.�. �- - — IJ--- .. _._ _._. _ .__ . . — CommunRy�evelopment � Plot tlate:May 17.2000,C.�nagic�MAGIC03.APR C�� '�>��r.�� p�z�,�, � o-r !v ) ' , . EXHII3�T B 2S 111 BC-01300 � ZS 1 l 0A D-U321�0 BAILEY AUNDRIA E BROWN MICHAEL J 10150 SW VIEW TERRACE 10627 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11 1 BC-03600 25110AD-01 S00 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND BROWN SCOTT C& PEGGY L JODETTE SUGDEN 14630 5W 106TH AVE 10430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S t t t BC-oi o00 2S t t t BC-o1400 BAUMAN C WAYNE BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L MARY 10145 SW VIEW TER 10270 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110AD-04204 zsi�ono-assoo BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A BURKS GILDA M&CHARLES C 1450 S KIHEI RD C205 14655 SW 106TH AVE KIHEI, HI 96753 TIGARD,OR 97224 � S110AD-04204 2S110AD-02810 B ENDT R T F AND SHARON A CAGLE THOMAS E 1450 S I RD C205 PO BOX 26 I,HI 9 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 110AD-02310 1 OAD-02800 BENZ FRED S CA THOM PO BOX 230029 PO BO TIGARD,OR 97281 T TIN,OR 62 OAD-02300 2S 110AD-09400 BENZ CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO 23002 BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC ARD,OR 97281 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 25111 BC-03800 110AD-09500 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS CAL HILL HOMEOWNERS SOC 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST BY STAN INS B INC TIGARD,OR 97224 8459 S LVD TLAND,OR 972 2S 111 BC-02900 110AD-09600 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L CAL ILL HOMEOW RS ASSOC TRUSTEES BY STAN AD LDER INC 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE 8459 S BUR VD TIGARD,OR 97224 P TLAND,OR 9722 2S 111 BC-00200 S 110AD-01200 BOGERT MARK H AND CA Y HILL HOMEOW S ASSOC MARY E BY STAN I DER INC 14445 SW 100TH 8459 S B D TIGARD,OR 97223 TLAND,OR 97223 , � . . 2S110AD-00570 2S111aC-03001 COLE DONALD R& NANCY A DUNKLEE JOHN 8 ti4ARGAfZET 11225 SW CHICKADEE TERRACE 10440 SW VIEW TERR BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97224 25110AD-00300 2S 110AD-03300 CONRAD EVELYN A EDWARDS LINDA L 10631 SW CANTERBURY LANE 10633 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 10AD-00310 2S 110AD-04202 CON VELYN EWING DOREEN L TR 10631 SW BURY LANE 14625 SW 106TH T ,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2s>>iac-oz5os 2S7_tOAD-04202 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K EW DO L TR 9750 SW INEZ 14625 O6TH TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 24 • 2S110A0-02010 2S111BB-01200 CRIST DAVID L&BARBARA A FABER ROBERT C 8 MARGARET A 14672 SW 106TH AVE 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 710AD-02000 25111 BC-03700 CRI AVID L BARA A FAIRLEY RONALD S&KAREN S 14672 S TH AVE 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE D,OR 9 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02401 2S 111 BC-02300 CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14530 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110AD-03400 2S 110AD-08600 DANIEL SUSAN J FISHER ELEANOR 10639 SW MURDOCK ST 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110AD-02100 2S110AD-03700 DREYER JOAN C FORD ROBERT D AND 14678 SW 106TH AVE GENEVIEVE V TIGARD,OR 97224 14677 SW 1�6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110AD-02110 2S 110AD-04100 DR JOA C GALYEN SUSAN E 14678 6TH AVE 14641 SW 106TH AVE T RD,OR 224 TIGARD,OR 97224 r • 25110AD-01700 2S OAD-04201 GARRISON PATRICIA L TR IRWI ORENE 14620 SW 106TH AVE 14635 6TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 224 zs>>>ac-o2�o0 2S 111 BC-03300 GLEAVES GREGORY L&JONETTE JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 10380 SW CANTERBURY LN SUE ANN TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-03400 2S111BC-01100 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND KARPSTEIN GREGORY A& BETTY JEAN KARPSTEIN BRIAN A& 10405 SW VIEW TERR. ELLERMEIER JEAN TIGARD,OR 97223 10220 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-04600 2S 111 B B-01100 GOTTER SAMUEL A 8 VICTORIA L KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS 17580 SW 131 ST AVE 14259 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-01900 2S 111 B 8-00900 HAASE JOHN G KA L CHARL &MARY J TRS 14666 SW 106TH AVE 14259 S TH TIGARD,OR 97224 D,OR 24 2S 110AD-01910 2S 110AD-00610 H J G KOMER DAVID E& 146 06TH AVE ROBERTS LISA A GARD,OR 24 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-01500 110AD-00600 HADLEY MICHAEL F KO R DAVID 10540 SW CANTERBURY LN ROBE A TIGARD,OR 97224 10625 TERBURY LN ARD,OR 97 2S 111 B B-0t 800 2S 111 BC-02100 HEISE NANON L ESTATE OF �ITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J BY MONICA HEISE 10090 SW INEZ 14245 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 • TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 117 BC-04500 2S 7 7 OAD-00400 HENERY JOSEPH J 8 LONG S CAROLYN BACCELLIERI FRANCES D 10629 SW CANTERBURY LN 10700 SW BEAV-HLSDL HWY#585 TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2St 1 OAD-04201 AD-00410 IRWIN LORENE A LONG R N 14635 SW 106TH AVE 1�629 C ERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 97 . . 2S 11�OAD-02700 2S 1 1 1 BG02500 LYNCH DORIS M MILROY JOHN T ANI�SHIRLEY 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 1102 NW SPRINGBROOK RD STE 251 TIGARD,OR 97224 NEWBERG,OR 97132 z �i oao-o2�i o 25111 BC-015D0 LYN DORIS MUDROW MICHAEL T 8 DIANE C 10579 RDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR ARD,OR 9 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 tOAD-03100 2S110AD-00910 MARSH BONNIE S MURPHY KAYE L 10621 SW MURDOCK ST 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2s i�i sc-oosoo 2s� on�-oosoo MATIAS CATHLEEN F MU Y L 14480 SW 103RD AVE 10619 TERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 T RD,OR 97 2S 111 BC-00700 2S110AD-00500 MCBRIDE GLEN W&JANET M MYERS CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL 10135 SW INEZ 10627 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-D3800 2S 111 BC-03500 MCCABE NANCY MYERS DON ANDREW AND 14661 SW 106TH AVE YVONNE LYNN TIGARD,OR 97224 10445 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 710AD-01600 2S 110AD-02400 MCMONAGLE PAMELA D NEVAN NICHOLAS AND GLORIA J 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN 10561 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-00710 2 110AD-02410 MCPHERSON LINDA D NE NIC S AND GLORIA J 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 1056 URDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 24 110AD-00700 2S 111 BC-02302 MC RSO DA D NOKES JOHN RICHARD&EVELYN J 10623 ANTERBURY LN 14650 SW 103RD AVE RD,OR 24 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-04000 2S 111 BC-02303 MILLER JUDITH A&PAUL E TRS NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10330 SW VIEW TER 14600 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 zsiio�-oisoo � zsiiiec-o,coo � OREGON FOUNDATION WC SARGANT FRANCIS J RUTH 520 SW 6TH 10225 SW VIEW TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 zs i i on,c.-o i aoo 2S 11 t BC-o22o0 OREGON FOUNDATION INC SCHMIDT TROY M&SUSAN L 10575 CANTERBURY LANE 10190 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97223 . TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 11 t B C-0osoo 2S t 11 BC-0 7 200 PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ANNE SEARS ALLEN C 10085 SW INEZ ST c/o WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA TIGARD,OR 97223 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 251 t OAD-01 O10 � 2S 110AD-02500 POWELL JACQUELINE S SIMONI JANET LEE P O BOX 23322 10567 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 2 110AD-01000 2S 110AD-02510 PO L J UELINE S SIM JA LEE P O 2 10567 ROOCK ST ARD,OR 97281 T ARD,OR 9 4 2S111 BC-02800 2S710AD-04203 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SMOOLE CHARLENE M CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 14615 SW 106TH AVE 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-03200 2 10AD-04203 PRUETT MARTHA SM CHA M 10335 5W VIEW TERRACE 14615 H AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 RD,OR 972 2S117BC-03900 � 2S111BC-01700 RAUDY BEVERLY STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10265 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 T►GARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BB-01000 2S 110AD-02600 REEDER MARY R STANLEY CHERIE 14300 SW 103RD AVE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00800 S 110AD-02610 RENICK ALVIN W AND CARLA M ST Y RIE 10175 SW INEZ 10573 RDOCK TIGARD,OR 97223 T RD,OR 97 4 25110'AD-00200 2S7 D-01110 STANSBURY YVONNE THOMP H L&BRANDON M 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10615 S A BURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TI ,OR 97224 2S 110AD-00210 2S 111 BC-02600 BURY NNE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 10633 NTERBURY LN 8841 SW COMMERCIAL T RD,OR 9 24 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110AD-00110 2S 111 BC-03100 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE TIMMINS KELLY A 8 KATHLEEN M 10635 SW CANTERBURY LN 14335 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-007�0 2S t 11 B B-01900 S� N A MARIE TPB PROPERTIES& 10635 C ERBURY LN WILLETT ARTHUR P T ARD,OR 972 PO BOX 1775 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 2S 110AD-08700 2S 110AD-02200 TANNER NANCY TRUSTEE UHLER ANN S& 307 POND RIDGE LN COATES LAURA C UBANA, IL 61801 PO BOX 23042 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 110AD-08801 2S 110AD-02210 TAN NAN USTEE UHL NN S 307 P GE LN COATES RA C NA, IL 61801 PO B 304 ARD,OR 97281 2S 110AD-08700 2S 110AD-00800 TA N TRUSTEE WHITMORE DOUGLAS E&GWENDOLYN 307 P DGE LN 14803 SW 106TH AVE NA, IL 618 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-03600 S 110AD-00810 TAYLOR CHARLES C II 8 AVA C W ORE DOU &GWENDOLYN 14685 SW 106TH AVE 14803 TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 97 2S 110AD-04000 2S 111 BC-04400 THOMPSON EVELYN M WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L 14647 SW 106TH AVE COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J TIGARD,OR 97223 WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN TRS 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110AD-01100 2S 111 BC-04300 THOMPSON HOLLY L&BRANDON M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 . ' - ' � � Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 76�'Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 912�4 Mary Ann Melvin CITY OF TIGARD 10395 SW Bonanza Way SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97224 Stephen Bicker 14235 SW 97�' Avenue i:\curpinlsetupllabelslClT South.doc UPDATED: 12-Apr-00 Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100�' Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 19�' Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold 15314 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109�' Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 , - _ Calvin�Presbyterian Church Ray Beyer 10445 SW Canterbury Lane CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADD. Tigard, OR 97224 CUP2000-00002 A PP�� c a��7 �ow�t c�Z Russell Leach Robert Gray Partners Inc. PO Box 1000 Sherwood, OR 97140 �L T 1- --� � - rD�-T—T-- �- _� - -- - -- �. _ ; �L�� , �<I � � . - � . I � a � I � ml McDONALD �EO�R.o�� FORM�r�o� �.s,EM i � _ ` -- - _ . —� —/ a4 � �I�---��-� �- - -- - --- - ST- C �Q� I'I�� ! I � �� i '�� VICINITY MAP �F �I , j r--�a _� � - CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH \Sr '~ 1 � i �] � �; � O� i �-- 0 ° � � _________________ ' �'�i� - - � � �� = r � �C�P�2�0�-��2 � � -� I - ._._, � . �JANZEM� _________________ I � i i � �--- - �r� �� I �_� �� _ — — � I � —� � —� � — — �--- �_ � I --- � 1 - — f -- -- ,1 �^ i i � __ � ��- -< . ;-U: � / � � � m w� I � m ' > � \2�� -�- L�ElN TERR _ I VIEW TEI 'I %� �� I �_ ' ✓ 'P�`� -�L -�--�--��-� -+ --J` j - � � � '� i - - I - i _. � T -�- --1---� ' � I I �-L�1�LLl i I rii;' , � � - � � � J �1� - - RY_LN � � --- 4/ �- CANTERBU � ,� ' -7�, (,-� SUBJECT SITE� ' ' , i - I i� i` ''' � �f � !- - � � ' � � � ' ' • ---- � I ! I I_ � 'w� PEMBROOK S' i i �— > I � - ',-- � f-- `— ---— �_- ��`- � � �� _ _ �_� - -� � I - � � � � � ; L�, � I I ! . , �— ----�-� r�� -- = � � I I ; N �`----�__ M�1RQO�K�T . — MURDOCK— - - -- I, �� _�I ;�—� I I �-- -;—� �� - sT _r_� �----� �� - � � �-- � �, � � - �W� � � I , � � . � � 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet � �Q � r � �_�� —__ I .' . . _ � �.]I _ .—�I i�J _—_ � � I I � �.._378 feel �q� � � {�I— � � �---� --1- o � � _ � �-- w � �^ f- � J f�,�, `� �'�; L -: ? ° ; Q I _-- — - u-�ll� - --- � - � -, � m � _��E�.MQNTEDE3, - _ �,�..,' I � � -- � City of�"figard � � [L7]LID .CL1 QJ i ' �0'— -- I . . -- I. r�T- -1 — I I I�� i , , I�I — �> f � - � Infortna6on on this map is for general lowtion ony and U1 � I I Q � � �� ahould be verified with the Developmenl Services Divisioe. --------- -�� J I � � � 73125 SW Hall Blvd � � � � ��"�----I� -- -�__ ._. �SVtrPEpp�_, L.-- �--j Tigard.OR 97223 �� ' . � I� . I I �-� --� ' . . (503)6341171 ' nttpJhwwa.ci.tigero.oc us I_ ____ —._ __--____._ ___. i_ . . . .. . . . . . _.__—___ _ __--_ -_ . Community Development Plot date: May 17,2000;C:UnagicWlAGiCO3.APR CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � cm o�no�no + ---- "` ---- ^y`__ –__�,'.� ___ } � 3e� �oo +«� � ' _ r.�. I �,�� --� — ��- --- � --��_------ 3+--- �--'3----------- ea� -------�-- ------- �� ---- .r '/ � _ ,,�� . ". � . FY� ' �g��L 'J.AUN t i � /.:�'� f� . .: � I GC;L"ol.� ^A_� . i PY.�RY ❑ r --- -- �.�R_ _.----- _. _.-- -_ ..�-- �. — L--�`m�re�.r+ I.�----- .,�s,..,G �IGJT�Y.. lwuPYAPC Ea`uT�w%a R1nvCwM 4�bnN6 Ort.v?+vM lF2i._r.Ht� �i.,t i .�w c�r:ab9.n.�osc�YE 'i P�'OETwP�r� GouO :iGA2 Fiw�[36 � '. > I � cwiz0 h� tir.�c�p a.. �•wuG. nxoP.��..i¢ . -___'__- _..... , , � � � � ,� a `_- ___—_ � I��y G � � . �— t 1 ,0 1�. � {3-�0 �" • \�� -. o0 __ � I f�,�� I �� - - � - - 06 i i , , � �� ` ��r,z �r� � - � � � rGni�T»Ys ��'�' Prca�y�w_ L- I�� - -o'o � Eac.-�..iG w P�rsr.�w+(� a.waaaw.,o -- , i - � l . L i� F�� c��a»arto �, � � 'I ; � 8 8 I ' i i s,�..�.�.c e I�'' � i , ; �..vsc..,aG . . ... � � I � NRV AOOi i - � i � /}-----��' - _ 5 NoM�N I � I � Rra cn 7��• �•� �4 S i0b� I � 1 � ��. p �. � I .li ��. ._.___ _ i Ea�eqsYa�P/dFD I . GN , i� _P � I M�O r'..k�Y �� . . . ...-_._} . . �_ : lAra� I f . � i aN / fi '�ILtJ.6 I .._ .. _t' � PAR�.Ys tr!' ^ I�.'. � �/Sr�eX�C RMiS __' V L2�,�.�.,-JP-. � IG ��.�� I � � I A�*-� I I � I � "`_ Y ._. Y .. I �—�'_" /� � � l— i—_.1 � 41 . I / I . -.. ` I �� i L?u'fo i � _ �.�� I C�� ` � �� srnt;, � � \V � �ti i� ' �� I �,�� II j\\ � ' � � � ��~/F � � i @xbT�.1JCs GN-V�U I � I �. ��" ��'q ��/ � � '�� •[�1+�RG1f F�+�O�tiG � ` ��_.r""� i• , � :�� \�. �.. !?MO Po2Tiw.� I -�900o I'I \�/ .�. _ . I wYZ�O tl� � � l� , � �J�f i ��?,� — � �� 804 I � � I I - - I N I �i �� _�� i I I � � � � �� _ � _ � ,� -_ - _ — �w�r,�s � '; .{' � ,� v,rtest q.s.,�v � A cr-err..o.J r -m. �� .� . , .. �, �j ��r�r�rs. a � '. . .j . ^ � TLP. HbM�S . 1I \\ � / ��vM�2G SawNJ� � . I � � I \ J < ,/ I' �I�I / � —. . ' \ � _ - ___ .- _ �, � ( � _..-__ _� �-__—/ — _.____'__—... . ___.. _ � _.__ t � ��'� .____ -_-____—�� . _ _ __.__.__-_._. � 1��6_�G 1r�5", b L77�vdwwi cr7.vGVMI� __. , __.__—"--_' _-_.._ . _ ...___ _'___'__' _.__. '___'-. _ ._ -�-.._ -- -- S �v GANT�fLPt7UZ`( �r.Nr ('10;C'fH 51'f� pLA f�l • t°201°DS�G7 AbblTl�l`� Id� 20 ��TY OF TIGAR� � CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION SITE PLAN N (CUP)2000-00002 (Map is not to scale) _____________________________________ Calvin Presbyterian Church Ray Beyer 10445 SW Canterbury Lane CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADD. Tigard, OR 97224 CUP2000-00002 �PP�req�,��wnt�2_. Russell Leach �J�l�L UQ t�,—�. Robert Gray Partners Inc. PO Box 1000 Sherwood, OR 97140 AFFIDAVIT OF MAiLING CITYOFTIGARD Corrin�uiitty,DeveCopment SfwpingA Bette�Community S7A�o�o�,�GoN ) County o 'lNashington �ss. �'ity of igard ) I, �atricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an A�'minr"strativeSpeciaCut Ilfor the City of 7"tgard, 4Nashington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriale Box(s)Bebw} . , C NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: — AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) - City of Tigard Planning Director �''� NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) � City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: � � r-, AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date ot Pubiic Heanng) � City of Tigard Planning Director C Tigard Hearings Officer r Tigard Planning Commission = Tigard City Council � NoTICE oF FINAL ORDER FOR:� CUP2000-00002/�ALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURfH ADDITION � �UNE 26. 2000 AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) � City of Tigard Planning Director � Tigard Hearings Officer � Tigard Planning Commission � Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE Of: (Type/Kind of NOtice) FOR: �_ I (File No.lName Reference) (Date of Public Heanng,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE Of fINAI ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S] of which is attached, mar4� ihlt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Eflhlblt"B" on lll 6 0 d deposite n th United States Mail on lllly 6,2000, postage prepaid. (Person th r d tice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befor me on the� day of� , 2000. OFFICIAL.S�AL G�j�/yZ�� SHERMAN S.CASPER COMM SSION N0.323409 y,, , MY COMMISSION D(F1RES'�AY 13,2003 Nly Commission Expires: Y�/l � � . � 120 DAYS- 9/1�/OO CITY OF TIGARD Community�DeveCopment ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD 7NasFcington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL�ORDER BYTNE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2000-00002 Case Name: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION Name of Owner: a vin res erian urc ttn: a e er Name of Applicant: ame Address of Applicant: anter u ane, i ar , Address of Property: ame Tax Ma /Lot No.: as in ton ount ax ssessor s a , ax ot A fINAI ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONfLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL THE CITY Of TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS Of REVIEWING AGENfIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFf REPORT AND REfOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC NEARING ON JUNE 26, 2000 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, fINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS fONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request:-➢The applicant has requested Conditional Use Approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. Zones: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Action:-➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental a encies � The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator 0 The applicant and owner�s) The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 6, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 21 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the deasion was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY 20, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP2000-00002/CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR TI�CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON Regarding an application by Calvin Presbyterian Church ) F I N A L O R D E R for a conditional use permit for a major modif'icadon ) to an existing church at 10445 SE Canterbury Lane ) CUP 2000-Q0002 in the City of Tigard,Oregon ) (Calvin Presbyterian Church) A. SUMMARY The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit(CUP)for a major modification to an e�cisting church. The applicant proposes to build a 16,670 square foot addition that will include classrooms, multipurpose rooms and accessory spaces. The applicant will restripe the parking lot,compensating for the number of parking spaces that will be lost to the proposed expansion. 1fie applicant does not propose any significant changes in church activities or other church facilities on the site, although landscaping will be added as required by past decisions. The original church development occurred in 1965. The City approved expansion of the church in1992 and 1994 (see final orders in the matter of CUP 92-0001 and CUP 94-0004,incorporated herein by reference). City of Tigaxd Hearings Officer Larry Epstein(the"hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on June 26, 2000. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permi� See the Staff Report dated June 15,2000. One witness appeared for the applicant. No one else appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application, and the applicant waived its right to have the record held open. T'he hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and took the case under advisement. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit subject to the conditions at the end of this final order. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane;WCTM 2S111BC,Tax lot 02800 COMPREHENSNE PLAN: Low Density Residential(1-5 dwelling units/acre) ZONING: R-3.5 (Detached single family residential) APPLICANT AND OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code("CDC")Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765. 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this apPlication on June 26, 2000. The record closed at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A(Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). a_ At the hearing, the hearings officer received and physically inspected the file maintained by the City regarding this application, including comments received after the Staff Report was issued. The record includes all materiaLs in the file prior to the hearing, testimony and evidence entered into the record at the hearing,the list of witnesses at the hearing and the tape of hcaring proceedings. The record is filed at City Hall. Hearings O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002 (Calvin Preshyterian Church expansion) Pnge I b. The hearings officer announced at the beginning of the hearing the rights of persons with an interest in the matter,including the right to request that the hearings officer continue the hearing or hold open the public record, the duty of those persons to testify and to raise all issues to preserve appeal rights,the manner in which the hearing will be conducted, and the applicable approval standards. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex pane contacts, bias or conflicts of interest 2. City planner Julia Hajduk summarized the Staff Report and the applicable approval critena. She cocrected the Staff Report to state that the applicant will restripe the parking lot tA provide at least 42 compact parking spaces and asked the hearings officer to modify proposed condition of approval 1 accordingly. She also cocrected the finding regarding "building height, size or lot coverage" on page S of the Staff Report to state that a condition of approval is not necessary, because the proposed structure complies with dimensional standards. 3. Architect Russ I.each testified for the applicant He summarized the history of the church on this site. He noted the proposed building site now is mosdy covered in pavement. He acknowledged the church site does not comply with minunum City parking standards, but,because the applicant is not proposing to enlarge the sanctuary, additional parking is not required at this time,except to make-up for seven parking spaces lost as a result of the development. He discussed landscaping, noting that the applicant will replace vegetation planted along the noRh edge of the site with arborvitae shrubs that are more likely to survive and to provide a buffer over time. He waived the applicant's right to hold open the record for a final argument� 4. At the end of the public hearing, the hearings officer closed the record and announced a decision to approve the application. C. DISCUSSION City staff provided basic facts about the site and vicinity in section III of the Staff Report. They recommended the hearings officer approve the application, based on the applicable standards and responsive findings in sections VI through VIII of the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval in section II of the Staff RepoR. The applicant accepted the findings and recommended conditions without correction or objection. There being no material issues in dispute, and there being no issues about which the hearings officer believes additional or different findings are warranted, the hearings officer adopts the Staff Report as his own findings as modified at the hearing in this malter. D. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed condidonal use permit does or can comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local,state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted�o ensure such compliance occurs. 2. The applicanl's request, CUP 2000-00002, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report, with the following amendment: a. Condition of approval 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: Submit a revised plan that shows all of ihc cxisting and proposcd parking spaccs on the site. The proposed parking shall include Hearings O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002(Calvin Presbyterian Church expansion) Page 2 at least 42 compact spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of the addition. D TED this Sth da July, 2000. Larry Epste' , Tigard Heanngs ficer Nearings O�cer Final Order CUP 2000-00002 (Calvin Presbyterian Church expansion) Page 3 Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: June 26, 2000 Time: 7:110 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD Cammunity�DeveCopment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ShQPtnfJABetterCommunity 120 DAYS = 9/11/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2000-00002 APPLICANT/ Calvin Presbyterian Church ARCHITECT: Robert Gray Partners, Inc. OWNER: Attn: Ray Beyer Attn: Russell Leach 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 1000 Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 02800 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and � ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5, low-density residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 1 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Planning Conditions: 1. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of this addition. 2. Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion or an acceptable alternate will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Planning Conditions: 4. Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. In addition, the remainder of the parking area shall be re- striped to provide more visible pavement markings. 5. All site improvements must be made in accordance with the approved plans. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: Based on information obtained in past decisions, the original sanctuary building was constructed in 1965 and was subsequently remodeled in 1972 and 1982. In 1992, approval was granted (CUP 92-00001) to add a new Narthex, fellowship hall and classroom addition. In 1994, approval was granted (CUP 94-0004) to construct a new 9,700 square foot sanctuary, add parking and modify the driveway location. Vicinity Information: The site is bordered on the north and west by property zoned and developed R-3.5. To the east and south are streets, with R-3.5 zoning across the street. Also, across the street is the John Tigard House. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a church facility constructed in several phases over the past 30 years. The proposal is to construct a 16,670 square foot addition that will house classrooms, a multipurpose rooms and accessory spaces. The applicant is not proposing to add any additional parking spaces to the site, because the sanctuary (which is how parking requirements are calculated) is not proposing to be enlarged. The parking is currently non-conforming because the standards have changed since the last approval in 1994. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 2 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION IV. DEG��iON MAKING PROCEDURES, P�RMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 ists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a multi-purpose room with classrooms and kitchen facilities associated with the existing church use. The Religious Institution is a Conditional Use in the R-3.5 zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed use (Religious Institution) is a major modification to a Conditional Use permit which is a Type Ilf-HO decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera Approval riteria) Additional Conditions of Approval) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810� E. Impact Study SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 3.5 acres. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary setbacks, landscaping, etc., and as conditioned, the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 3 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site is already developed with the church facility. The area of expansion does not require the removal of trees, parking, etc and appears to be suitable for the expansion. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and All public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water have adequate capacity to serve the site as discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-3.5 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for Religious Institutions specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.B.16 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDAR� R3.5 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq.ft. z�,Q00 sq.ft 3.5 acres Minimum Lot Width 65/90 ft. SAME AS R-3.5 295 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft 25 ft 30 ft(no change) Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft 20 ft 235 ft Side yard 5 ft 20 ft 68 ft(no change) Rear yard 15 ft 20 ft 45 ft Maximum Height 45 ft. See note[1] 38 ft.approx. Maximum Site Coverage[2] --- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] Minimum Landscape Requirement --- SAME AS R-3.5 No change[3] [1] Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] The proposed addition will be located where there is existing asphalt,therefore,there will be no net increase or decrease in impervious surface or landscaping. As identified in the table above, the applicant's plans show that the dimensional standards for the base zone and Conditional Use standards are met. - The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Communi� Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.39 Decision Making Procedures;18.510, Commercial Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Reg ulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 4 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � ' The use will comply with ��e applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied. Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use. ection 18.330.030. states that the Hear�ngs Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facifities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; Due to the nature of the use, it is anticipated that the majority of activity will take place on the weekends. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; There will be no noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust associated with this addition above and beyond what currently exists. In addition, because the area of expansion will bring an outdoor play area, indoors, the noise level will decreased. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, andlor lot depth or width; The existing buffer requirements, as discussed further in this report, are adequate. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the expansion area will comply with the height requirements and the location is in accordance with the setbacks. Because of this, an additional condition is necessary. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; A condition is not necessary for this criteria since, as discussed further in this report, there is no change in the parking or access and no increase in vehicle trips to the site. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; As discussed further in this report, additional right-of-way is not necessary and, therefore, need not be required as part of this approval. This is discussed further under Street Utility and Improvement Standards. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; There is an existing buffer with landscaping along the property boundaries. A site visit by staff revealed that the landscaping along the northern property line is minimal and does not include shrubs that were shown on the 1994 expansion plans. The 1994 plans showed a hedge of Fraser Photinia installed along the fence line. A condition of approval is recommended requiring the applicant to re-install this landscaping (or similar hedge) along the fence line where previously shown. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; Signs have not been proposed. Because the use is existing, it is expected that the existing signs will remain, however, compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone should be sufficient in the event that a change in signage is desired in the future. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 5 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Limiting or setting stanaards for the location and/or intensiry of outdoor lighting; • The lig hting is not proposed to be altered as a result of this expansion. There are no known complaints regarding lighting from adjacent property owners, therefore, staff finds that existing lighting levels, as previously approved, do not impact adjacent properties. Because no change is proposed in the lighting, no additional conditions of approval are necessary. Rec�uiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; As previously discussed, the applicant should be required to install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 approval. No additional buffering and screening is necessary provided the applicant comply with screening previously approved. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Fences are existing and are adequate. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal and there are no watercourses, habitat areas, or drainage areas on the site. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrianlbicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the followin� condition is warranted by this Conditional Use approval. Any other conditions listed above are not necessary or will be addressed elsewhere in this report. CONDITION:Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion will be installed along the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the �round floor landing of stairs, ramps, o� elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; There is an existing walkway, which does not cross the parking lot or access way, which will also serve the area of expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 6 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • � Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Re9uired walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and As stated above, the walkway does not cross the parking lot or accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Reyuired walkwaxs shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The existing walkway is paved with concrete, thus satisfying the criteria. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the req uired access width for developments with more than 100 parking spaces is one 50-foot-wide access with a 40-foot pavement width or two 30-foot-wide access points with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The proposal does not increase parking requirements, therefore, this criterion does not apply. In any event, the site has one, 24-foot-wide and one, 30-foot-wide access into the site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are satisfied. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development pro1 ects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees are existing, therefore, this standard has been met. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. The proposed expansion is in a residential zone and abutting residential uses on all sides. While the site is not classified as a residential use, it is not a use listed in the buffer matrix requiring screening from ad1'acent residential uses either. In any event, the site has an existing 20-foot buffer along the north property line and a 13-foot buffer along the east property line. As discussed previously in this report, the applicant must install landscaping in accordance with the 1994 land use approval for the sanctuary expansion. To the south and east are streets. The proposed expansion is taking the place of an existing asphalt play yard and will have a landscape stnp installed around the penmeter of the addition. Because the formal buffer is conditioned to come into compliance with the previous approval and the addition will provide additional landscaping around the perimeter of the building, no additional buffering or screening is needed. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 7 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Screening Special Provisions: ' Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There is no change to the parking or existing parking lot screening, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Off-Street Parkin� and Loading (18.765� Disab ed- ccessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site has 8 ADA spaces marked on-site, whereas, only 6 are required based on the number of parking spaces provided over the entire site. Access Drives: With re ard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street �o off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and aefined through use of rails, fences, walls or other 6arriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface• and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsec�ion 18.810.030.P, groups of fwo or more parking spaces.shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All of the access drives are existing and are not proposed to be modified, therefore, this standard does not apply. _ Parkin Lot Strip ing: , Excep��for singfe-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the ofif-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearfy marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The parking is existing. A site visit revealed that the existing striped parking is very faint and is in need of re-striping. As will be discussed further in this report, the applicant will need to re-stripe some of the parking .spaces to provide for 7 more parking� spaces. Staff recommends that the entire parking lot be re-striped at that time. It is stafif's understanding that this is planned by the Church, however, a condition is necessary to insure that this is accomplished. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel sto at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. �e front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 8 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . � Tt�e parking lot and lan�...;ape areas are existing and are ��t proposed to be altered, therefore, this standard does not apply. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. While the parking is existing, the applicant will be re-striping some of the parking to create compact parking spaces and make up for 7 spaces that will be removed as part of the expansion. The applicant has provided staff with a re-striping plan that shows the parking re-striped to provide for 32 compact parking spaces at 7 5 feet in width. The standard spaces will continue to be 8.5 feet wide or larger. The existing access aisles will not be altered. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visib�e from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional si�ns shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. There is an existing bicycle rack that must be relocated because it is in the area of expansion. A condition is necessary that the applicant submit a revised plan that shows the new location in accordance with the standards in Section 18.765.050. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements a pply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/z feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicfe park�ng is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicxcle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. There is an existing bicycle rack on-site, therefore, the detail of the bicycle rack is not applicable. The location will have to be revised as discussed and conditioned previously in this report. Minimum Bicycle Parkin� Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for Religious Institutions, one (1) bicycle parking space is required for every 20 seats in the main assembly area, however, because the applicant is not revising the main assembly area, no additional bike parking is required. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-0�002 PAGE 9 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Table 18.765.2 states that tne minimum parking for a Religious institution is one (1) space for every two (2) seats. The existing sanctuary seats 500, therefore, current standards require 250 parking spaces. The applicant has indicated that there are 150 parking spaces on-site. Based on review of the last CUP approval for the site, however, there were 169 spaces proposed (only 94 were required), 9 of which were in the vicinity of the expansion. A site visit confirmed that there are seven spaces that will be removed m the area of expansion. Because the parking is currently non-conforming, approval can not be granted for any development that increases the non-conformity. By removing spaces, the non-conformity is increased. Staff contacted the applicant's representative who reviewed the site and determined that the existing standard parking spaces could be re-striped to provide some compact spaces. By re-striping some of the parking, 7 additional spaces can be picked up. The applicant has provided staff with a plan that shows this is possible and feasible. Based on this, a condition is necessary that requires the applicant to re-stnpe the parking lot.in accordance with the plan submitted to staff on 6-14-2000 to provide 32 compact spaces with a net increase of 7 spaces within the main parking lot area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: . Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least 32 compact spaces. . Prior to final inspection, the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. . Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The location must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. Tree Removal — Cha ter 18.790 ection 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's plans do not show any trees will be removed, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed to remove and trees, this standard has been met. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or wliere no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas have been met. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 10 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � � C. ADDITIONAL SITE UEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Bufferin , Screening and Compatibili Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 �Parkin�); 18.360.090.�4 (Landscaping); 18.360.09�15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Relationshi to the Natural and Ph sical Environment: ui ings s a e: oca e o preserve exis ing trees, topography and natural draina�e where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subjec to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between ad1'oining .buildings for adequate light air circulafion, and fire-fi hting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind l�rees shall be preserved to�he extent ossible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree �emoval. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the exp�ansion area in a location that will not require the removal of trees, does not decrease the bu�Fers and does not remove parkin . Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division and will be reviewed�urther as part of the building permit review. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: . Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; . Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by ofhers; . Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; . The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the-angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and . Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular tra�fc and in potentialfy dan gerous areas sucF as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a heig ht so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficienf to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this pro1�ect and has not indicated concern of objection with the proposal. Staff, therefore, interprefs that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the crime prevention standards have been met. Public Transit: rovisions wi in the plan.shall be included for providing for transit if the development prop osal is adjacent to existin or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit fac�lities shall be based on: t�e location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPAN510N/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 11 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The site has frontage on �W Canturbury Lane and SW 103�- Avenue, both of which�are greater than '/4 mile from the nearest tri-met route, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810: hapter 18.810 provi es construction standar s or the imp ementation o pu lic and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Street And Utility Im�rovements Standards (Section 18.810): apter 18.810 provides construction stan ar s or�mplementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDC��on of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required ma� include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of- way width and 24 to 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a minor collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on this street. No additional dedications are required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved to City standards. No additional improvements are necessary. SW 103�d Avenue is also fully improved adjacent to this site, inside of a 50-foot ROW. No additional ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage A�ency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 12 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . TMis site is presently servo,, from the City's public sewer systen�. The new building addition will be served from the existing onsite private lines. No additional public line work is necessary. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states req uires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facilifiy shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site presently accommodates any upstream surface water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Mana�ement Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction prog ram resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Even if the building was to be located in an area that was previously landscaped, the new building addition would be adding approximately 4,356 square feet of new impervious area. Any additional areas under 5,000 square feet are considered insignificant and, therefore, do not necessitate the installation of an onsite detention system. Utilities: � Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above �round, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: . The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; . The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; . All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and . Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-groundin� costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 13 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER grounding in conJ unction with the development. The determination shall be on a ca�se- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilifies. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's properiy shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. Overhead utility lines on both streets have been previously addressed by the applicant. No additional work is necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT TANDARDS: Public Water S stem: his site is presently served from the City's public water system. The new building addition will be served from the onsite private lines. No additional public water line work is necessary. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. There are two existing onsite water quality swales that were constructed with an earlier phase of this project. The project engineer, Tom Sisul, submitted a letter, dated April 24, 2000, that explains that there is enough capacity in the existing swales to accommodate the additional impervious area. Therefore, no additional water quality facilities are necessary. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. - FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street utility and improvement standards have been met outright and no further conditions are necessary. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system andty pe of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the im�act of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real propertX interests, the applicant sFiall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has provided an impact study which indicates all necessary improvements will be made. The applicant is not increasing the number of trips, therefore, a TIF will not be required and there are no required improvements or dedications for this expansion. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 14 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � ' SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: . Site requires 3 fire hydrants. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comment: . A new double check valve device assembly (backflow protections) is required to be installed directly behind the existing water meter to meet current requirements. The City Police Department and The City of Tigard Property Management/Operations Department have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into the body of this report. Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, TCI Cable, General Telephone, Tri-Met and US West were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. � June 15. 2000 PREPARED . Julia adjuk DATE Associate Planner / ; J � ..11��'��•C s-r��ft�� ,l� � - June 15. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard B ersdo DATE Planning Manager i:lcurpinljulialcup\Calvin Presbyterian.doc CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2000-00002 PAGE 15 OF 15 6/28/2000PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � T— - � . ' • � —��_�� L_ . I I �� Ea�A.P�� :�a�..,o� s.s.�Eu cD NALD � � i� - - , �R�� I ' VICINITY MAP ST a ,' CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH h - �7 O � iA -- ----------------- ' '� '.�._ o � ' ----------------- - � - (CUP)2000-00002 . ANZEN _________________ �,� -- �T ,Z. , - ,' � � JF ---- -� � I ! � '�, F.. � — i---- Q !'��' � � w �. —`�'!EV1!TE�tft IEW TEl � , i � � � I � 1 J - I - - __ INEZ�ST I -�-�---T- ! i JE � - � �Ld--— ---�- �- � � �J� SUBJECT SIT ---; , � I I > �' I . I ' � (� � m � I � � ' ' � . - --- 1�__I__ �� N IR�OCK I ', w � i B > ' 0 100 200 300 a00 SDO Feet _ ¢ �"=378(eet �� , � e � —r � � � � �o ___ � ___ -_______ — � _ _ '� � UYTLN/17/�7/�/] � fI��fI�fI�� p m m i — I I �^__ '', Ciry�of"figard iAl-N �–�.L1�J � � � 111___ � � I Infortnation on this map is for qenerai IocaUOn only antl � �� — � ; �� houl0 be vanfied with Ihe Development Sernces Dw�s�on t31Y5 SW Hall Blvtl ---�---_ � SIM1rPEPP�g�� ---� Tiqard,OR 97217 I — �—a ` � I I i I ' (50J)679-1171 � � i, �It p:llw.w�a.h g ar tl or u s I ______—___. .__.. _. ._ _. _.'_—_ _. __. .__ _.__ . . ____'_ ' ___ - ___. . .. _._ Community Development Plot date:May 17,2000;C:Imagic\MAGIC03.APR CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � - crtr oF no�M � �'`__--e.,e vo�T�.r.+ ____._.e �"--_—.-_ . � . _ _ „r_ . 'i'�uo yy��'' � 3Bm � 9900 — I — +aoc+ I _______—____, �_��__�_,.LLi'_ ___��r��"�SY___��.�`k.-.^�� `��_� ..�._ �� , . Q.' jj � �+C 1Y1�.Y! 1'�t I � �ww�' � f r � +JS��/f/w� � Pt..rrl :.� --�___ ._ n _ ___—__�_ . � � 'O N ' ��Eyn..Y v.uCY�PG �G�'�"��w%s m F M�GM i E—^ M�6T�Y �.,vn.�6 �r1..vsw.N �h�a._r.«s� z �+e.� c�.m�.nuox�+E ', px2tL-D�Elw1 G��wD C.aR�2R�r.+t�6 � : �+vRUM I iS � � ' i c.+rz.o na.r�.+c�p r++- .wi ..�+ ' i ,I �—_.._-__...__�..�_... .�, �• �. f / � _ __ :a � �� . � _ �� - �� - � � - � � � � � � i .r I il � i � ' ! s.,.,,,�s,z � i T I I II O � /.�'��r.�6 I� i � - � �i g� I� �� I I��,,I i�i i�l li � i a�.neac..c �j ' _ f °�° �I c4.+a�i�,�arc - I 1 i, i �I �i I� , i 8� �..� I � I Illi; 'lil ! -1�--+NG�VJhOOi i � I �I�'I� I Illj�� '�I/ 2r4.c/'^ _ I� i9 M�N - , iI I � " fl��R�Ob'- � , IIII..I I Ill�lli�l I.I � � - --� '_.__-- T - . I I I � ., i i � . � l..�ie�r��,Ys�vw,+eD ; I (-w � I I I � _4 M.o ru.�.Y � I '�1 I � � "" ,._.{ _..._-. . . I LM�VGCnPeO 5wIC0• _ � _ �II GWIa�Ri FS,w- r'rarr-s ��-�� I /AG Ni �f �.I � nA ' ,/� -__- �I SrwwYwb M�5 J (�w..�-JP. I 1 'Y>.n0� i — !' -- A54'nnv� .-.,� � _ _ .�I � _ __._ � __ . ' l / I I - � � ___.. � � . — - -_ � �I i 1 � _" / ' � rl �� i 'tl , � ��" � s.��, ��,- — - - _ �;�� I I � , , , /, �. ��. . - � - , , � i�� `��"; /�r� ,��,�\ i � , i�/%� �,��' �; /�,`` � � �`��:�� e.ae-�N� cr..v,a � � � - �o � ��, I � �U�'„_....--'""""�I �q;� � i,, ``�1!f� �� A� �� o».,cc« a,,..a.,w i I � TM+� Po2TM \ "w^-'� � �t ? � v � ��\.�� ,� , �� q,,� � � (�e+ �� I ,�' � � � ,, „' �: � , ,� �,;�,i „ , I � �' � I� � 'i = -.i�%!/ I � e.esr,�a �� — `�- � --� `��. � v,.re�G q+uzv .�� e/Cs"'RM'f.�rJ �r .. ` \� ' , Ii�c+.-fh / // C}KlRwY+ I �r . ', /. Rlr LlbrflS � ��y � . � �wMMC S�w��rJ� I I �'� ��I �/, . ¢ II \��' ____'_'".__� . I �� . ..__...__._ �\_ � __ _ '__"___ .....'_ � ' � _ __ _' — ��_�� - __. . . _"_"__� . �6r� '__..-.. Sr9-� as�vGV MI av,o��.» --- - —___. N _--- ___ _ -�-- ---_ ----- - —_ ._..--------- --- -- --- -----_.__..- -------_..---- � .�._ . S \V GANTE�ZPOU2`I 6...4h1�' i �IO � �N hl�f� P�-a � • I�rzol°�S�p AbbITl01� _ Id` 'Lo I OF TI � CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION CITY ��RD __ I SITE PLAN � (CUP)2000-00002 (Map is not to scale) _____________________________________ Ray Beyer Calvin Presbyterian Church CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADD. 10445 SW Canterbury Lane CUP2000-00002 Tigard, OR 97224 Russell Leach Robert Gray Partners, Inc. PO Box 1000 Sherwood, OR 97140 '.��;' ... .. . . .. :. .. .. , . ' ; i � I COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9a, P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 NOtIC@ T7' 9 6 6 3 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising •City of Tigard ' ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 S��d Hall Blvd. •Tigard,O.regon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit �?�ccounts Payable • The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday,June 26,2000, at 7 P.M., at Tigard Civic Center—Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon.Both public,oral and written AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal STATE OF OREGON, ) Code,and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS' Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements �, Rob�7n $P 1 ozPr or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker and all the parties an being first duly sworn, depose and say,that I am the Advertisi opportunity to respond to the issue precludes an appeal, and failure to Director, or his principal clerk, of the`�'?�a rd—TLalati n specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Com- a news a er of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.0 Prehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal to the P P Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue. and 193.020; published at Ti c�ard in t A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or aforesaid county and state; that the on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for in- Rub 1 i c Iie a r i nq/CtTP 2 0(l 0—0 0 0 0 2 spection at no cost and copies can be provided at a reasonable cost. A a printed copy of which is hereto an�exed, was published in t copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least entire issue of said newspaper for OrIE successive a seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and can also be provided at a reasonable cost.Further information may be obtained from Julia Hajduk, consecutive in the following issues: Associate Planner,in the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,Oregon 97223,or by calling 503-639-4171. June 8 , 2 0 0 0 PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)2000-00002 >CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ADDITION< The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a � 16,670 square foot addition.This addition is the last of a three-phase con- j --- struction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW Subscribed and sworn to efore me t ' CRITERIA : Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and - 18.810. ctn�or tiwwc - �oo:�oos _ rr. Not Pub ic for Oreg� � � ! , �: � , � ,� i�l My Commission Expires: � �_—1 � ! ; i ,'j ., -� —r--7-'1 / � I � ,� —f!: � ;, . � '.� „� i �: AFFIDAVIT �� s' �� ; �..- �-' �',� �. ; ,� .� . �'� ;; �' � ' ' T�; i ,.� \ \ / �,, : i , � � _. ' �� '� ; �, 1� �� i.`/ '. \ �� ` � _�� I � � ,, �-----= /J �� `�` . Ir-i'y��"ITr,T:� J-:F� �c / Y—! . !—� �-�„-�"�" �r'�� fL�! � 1�.J ! I �� 'l.�}+r��.'•� ��_�-:� _� , �. � �� I i I _� ' 1 � '{ �� .�.^�__� i./%/�. ----�^-; , 1- � t i 1 I , i ��ri;,/,,,' � � � i�L�.J b�Y�. � �% ��-T—� � j ._ . �i� � � � _ �/� -. —_ .i ._ - . 1� ��. �._ . /%jj i �^ r- i �� I I v1s� —_ I ' —^ //j ' 'y,T�� . . ' � _ � —�,. • ��..� . .'__.. . .. . .. . . ��1Q�M�^��..``; 1� � ��L� ��01L�1'� 1 . � I ' ��.i;��' ��1� � _._ . _ _' _.�L.� • �_ _ _..� . -� � � J - `�1--'— � ' ' i. -- ��-- �r. _ -• -' i _��=_a , � Jv� �' �_ , � __�j -- ...�� ;'�_. �.�� _� — — —' — ��_J� _ _71 �. � •� _y��_�. � �=+, . Z�'.� �_. __'� � M - -- - - - — �---- ' '' • _;J, . .�. _�.;�_-._ . �. _. __ --- ---" y --�� --� --�--� --�--' ' � - `-: '_—�—�'— —— — — � —— ��..;,:_ _ :.._.. �.: E ' �`. ' — — �Z — --' �' ! �—:•_: � --- ' ' z.�. � , L�. . .� � _. � ��_"__.r ' '��CT .. _-M:,n...-��.._� _ ,�• k ' — TT9663—Publish June 25,'lUW. �:�: � I ��t�::: . _ . �: • ' � ;;i�, ;;:.: � • ' ��:�' , i . C17Y OF TIGARD PLANNING DIViSION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � cm or fioue KD�-4 �+/r wOO�T�N r—'_—_ _. "'-�='--3'=------_ � � � I T_ .!oJ ��/J I 31on 79u'� �°a . ��___�� __�� r� �� (��...�� f u IU(1�1� I � t,',/ I ° i � fi s o�+n.,.1'� r ^''"^''. I GiM�.+G u.oY.�rC ku6T�wX. s R NY.n i E-'—'— M��TYL i a.�vr�.+� at.vw.N (nrts_�.+�� ' � i �.+e.w c�.c�..n„or+'1E R+��L-DCr li.1 fw�.0 c/aMF �►.wb � ; � �canSu�M ___'..._'.'_."'. ^ i c..s.o�eo.r+..cre ^+.. ...e.�s n�a►.�< i ' � � / ` �• � ! W • / '""� ! �0 � G I I � p �I -� -� .� �_ _ .-• I � ♦i � I I '.i� - _ _ _ � � I a I � '� i' s„� _- '- _ � �t4�sn.w . ��I�� m.. �' I y vMw.�..lL � I. ( ,. �r .i ��II ^ti'Ywn- _ _ -_ : I � I S' tR �7 � ��I I �I il'i i Ly�a°NG = . o�i f.td1�Y 1L � �III �I � �i,i�Il��..i� _ _ , _0' .C.+tA.4T.'LML I I � s�ae.w�dL •� ��' I '��Ih '� ' Nea! �.00� i i.v.afc.v+,7G RrYC.y^� ''i��.IOM�RI � ' flll I III�� I�� O pV K�OO"... � . I I�1�I�I �'qI, III� �� T �^ ' I li�� I �il .II .I III � �-..___�. v�'W`pM1ED �i f � pMl r ' I�� ' � I s�orto. t,wou.�reo ' L cu+rwrr,e.� � l.'�R.+-'r�� rs.ocs � � rAa.•� wf � i T�.�, __ � �� +n.w�s n+nFS c�a,�+-�r• nzPr.��T � '� \ II — __' �..� . .. .__._ i �---�� '_-_ �I I I �� I �\ — _ ?_ '.,: � 0� ; i - �n.+s �� _ - �� I n � Csr�ne), � 4/ - �� i' , _ �� \ //// � \�\\ � �� / �\ � � �� I �'� /j i \ �� / � �\ i i . � ��i �� ' �� Y�TiU4 GM.vaJ 1 � � 0 I .. i \�\�\ � � � tw�R�.M Au.0i�.0 -,erwo � �'��I�;�i� ��.ii i��i��I�ii � ! �� '.�. � �(Trw ReaT�� %%/j� � '� ��\�� i%�� i�� ro�ti � ; Z / ! `�� 'i ///� �\ � '%�!i�� / ' ;� �i 1 �` � %,� � �� \ � ,, �` �/ .� \\�� \ — - // i _ j �_.a ——_ � � w.er»+e i -+ � - �rc t...rtv 1 ✓ /� . « ; ; .�.�.,., ;i �� , , , �� , � ` I0.P..HbrR�" j I : �� . � (wrrllLG srw�N� I �� ; , n � I �I _...� l - � � ---..--- —� — — ------ --------- - __ // � '��- 1fim7�..� A_-.—. iai9r. � tl�7�+�ww m9evR+MMI� . . .''_'_' '_._'__.'__'._"'__"'".'_„"._...__"�___._._.�..2_�-_...___'_'._._._.._._""_'__'__" '.�'.� .._ ._�_�.�."' _'.�._�_«..�.._."' . "'r $. \V GANT�.RrPC�U.2Y L1�rN k� (yO TI"I �IT� F'4-A� rl • PRQ�d�� Ab{'7fT 101� • I°- 20 � ' �s�a�ow �w� � C�� O� �'��RD � C�►LVtN PRE3l�YTERIAPI CHURCH ADDITION ��====---===-=-=--- SITE Pt.AN � {CU�)2000-400fl2 (Map is not to scale) �_=a�__�______ - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -�----- ��.�� -Z�_ � (/� �� I____� . \ GEOG��HiC iwi0A4�iiOM SrS�Eu � �p� ,. � �' VICINITY MAP 5+�, � � �--�i CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH � � � � I--- I _________________ � I (CUP)2000-00002 . ANZE i _________________ T � � � � --- x I I r ' I� - � i � � � < � �I � � >, TE B VIEW_TF� � i I I 1 -- -- � II - - - T � !I v� _ ER `: � . �, �� i SUB.lECT SIT � � � J � I � � I ! � � � �� . N R � I � �� 0 100 200 300 100 500 Fe�t � � � � I � 1'.77a feat �� ___ ____ ___:_- _ i � ��j Ql ( I I-1 Ciry of Tigard ' �'�r 11/ � � � '� --� � m I w__ �-iy� Inlortna�ion on�nis map is fo�qaneni ioca�ion onM�+M _ 4 — � ' "- � I I �houltl W vsnfi�d wth th�p�vNOpm�nt Sernu�Dmsan � � 171�5 SW Mall Blvy � � �P��..._C'� TiparC.OR 97227 '��-� (50�)834�171 � � I Attpinvww.cil�qar0.oru• — --'---..f_.�_..--- ---- -- nity Development ! � � � Plot date:May 17,2000;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR ' � � � C�NDITI�NAL USE TYPE III APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall 8lvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX.• (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: �"\ GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): F FF USE NLY O? or ,^;� 10445 SW Canterbury Lane � Case No.(s): �V�P2�?��- J�� Tax Map 8�Tax Lot#(s): Other Case No.(s): Map: 2S1 11BC Lot # 2800 Rec�i�t�vo.:V�='��'��'`-'?t� Site Size: Application Accepted By: SPN�'�:� Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': Calvin Presby terian Churc Date: >� .z"--'-a�_'�- Address: 10445 Sw Canterbury L�hone: 639-3273 City: T i ga rd, O R Zip: 9 7 Z 2 4 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant': Calvin Presbyterian, Ray Bever Address: 10 4 4 5 SW Can t e rbury Phone: 6 3 9-3 2 7 3 Comp PIan/Zone Designation: City: Tiqard, OR Zip:97224 ' When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpin\masterslcua.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSALSUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: T.f?° ,^,:•J^°CS Of f°,^.�� Of tf18 SL:.h.�°Ct�!'Or^.°.'+�' r@�U°�+r0!?G�l�lC:?�� C r��ij�iiGaiivil rr-Oi i71 Use approval to allow(please be specific): � wner's Signature/Written Authorization See at tached ro osal summar � T'tle Transfer Instrument or Deed P A Y � Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) �]�Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") [�pplicanYs Statement �of copies based on pre-app check list) SA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) �Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes �Filing Fee $1,615.00 1 . ► List any VARIANCE, SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: None APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as �ES�f:�'J@t'.Gi��i��TOi��v^i.�iS ia�'i�2;;:.atior� ir the"fZcqu�rzd Submii#al Elema��ts" uOX. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject pro�ertv. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this a� day of , 19�� Presbytery of Portland lvin Presbyterian Church �� s t Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Robert Burk, President Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Calvin Presbvterian Church Application for Conditional Use Proposal Summarv Request Conditional Use approval for a two-story, 16,670 sq. ft. addition to Calvin Presbyterian Church. This addition is the last of(3)building additions proposed and presented to the Hearing Examiner(initially in 1991). The proposed addition includes Classrooms, a Multipurpose room, and accessory spaces. No additional space of seating is proposed for the existing "Main" Assembly Space (Sanctuary) and no new paving or parking is proposed. -� , -----� Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:03/24/2000 14:54 User: frant Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0000936 Date: 03/24/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 1,615.00 Name: ROGERT GRAY PARTNERS INC Cash: 0.00 �ddress: PO BOX 1000 Check: 1,615.00 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 N/A : 0.00 Change: 0.00 Twe Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 1,615.00 � �� . �_0 (,�—�- o3 -o � c. �� . , . • � . :,..._ . � . , -io . — . _ _ �. . �'y s , � .-,_.. �........� -�-' • � . , . � -T w �:'4 34�s .. . Z�{j7 ��i.FAQ:h? �nt�r�d inGO thi� � d•� of Arri]� 19b1� b7 ` � �r�d b�tw�an B�9I� HVLII CUYAI:� torn�rl7 $�eel� Enth Szlth� �nd �.�•+� ,` � , M. COTU.l� h�r buahand, her�iaatter call�d Lha Ysndore� and ?tiE P`��B2T}�T Ul R:�I'1Al�� tn �tegon corpotation� h�reinattsr c�il�d Lh� 1endN� 1f � T Y b S S � x H:_ , , I Th�t th• 9�ndor�� foT ard in conaidsr�►Lian of th� py�aent�� coy�rr �t• and aarers�nt h•r�inatter to b� Faid� k�pt a.nd parforaed b� th� Y�ndN� do h�r�b� agr�• Lo ��11 to th� Trnd�a +ir� ty� 7�r�d�� herob� agr�es to put� ohae� l�^c� Ch� Y�ndora arsd te pnT for aa bareix�altar prorid�d Lh� follaring d��crib�d rsal pmp�rtr altuut• in th� Cau'str ot '.��o!+ingt.on� 9tet• ot 0T�6e++, to-vitt �11 ot Lot� .�l..-�_ 6L7 Tirsrdrill• Hei hte :•:��hingto�t ��tT� Qr.aon; airi Lo� s oC in3 e an, rxc�pt thai porlion �n�rsot con�aT+d to ?irard 'Aat�r Dietriet b� dsed reconi�d Ju17 3�� lql,�� gook 27�� Pig* 659, d�acrib�d as Collows; 8�6inr,in6 •t th� Nort}rYa�L corn�r of Lot 5, T1gu'drille $�itht�� a ■ubdl�iaion of r+cord in Section 11, 7o�rnnip 2 9outh, 8arig• 1 Me�L� ot L!�� ifilL,eett. }(er�dian� i� +�uhln;ton - Cocu�t�� Or�gonf runnin3 th�n�� 9outh 1' 19' aest along th� 5��at 7,1n� af ■aia subdl�l�ion 16s f�Qt Lo the 3outhxa�t corn�r.ot Lot s� th�nc• lU��t alar+g in• South 11n� of Lot 5� 26l. ,f��t= th�na• Korth and p+rallel Yiih th• 'deet lin� of eaid Lot ib$ f��t Lo Lh• !(orth llr� tharaot+ thanc� 'A�st 264 teet to !h� plac• nf beginninRj" Al�p th� folloxir� part:on of Lot 3� T!re:d+'111� N�ighta� Mas!�• � S�Con Cocu�tT, Or•gon, aer• particulsrl,7 d�scrlb�d as fo11oY�: � S�rinning at th� 9vutheaet corner of �aid Lot 3, Yhich la alao � th• l�orth�ait corn�r oC Lot 1.1 thanc� r.�rvsina NortherlT along , � t5� Es�t ltn• al aaid Lot j, a dletanc. of 2.4 �hsinc to th• ! � L�� SoutMast ootn�r of Ch� Lnct d�ecrib�d in d�ed t.o Oauglaa L. , lohnwn� s+cord�4 in B� 430, Pa;• 22, D�ed R�eords, washington Z�j� Cou�t�, prer,ont Lh�no� '�e�ter� along th� South lir:• of aatd � JoMbn Tr-�ot ird pt�rsll�l LO Che South lin• of eaid Lot 3, a % distana• of a.51 ehain■ to ih� weyt lin• of said LoZ� t�anc� � SouLE 2.4 cfs+ina to th� 3outtpr+et aorn�r of sald Lo� 3� Yhich iy also CM 8orthY�st corn.r af Lot �f iher�c� Easl, 4.51 chaina to th• �Ijc• ol br.Bir�nLtig; � svarscr ra r;� pou.�tr+c� .� "�C' I. R.ighta of p�1fa 1n �+d ta Chat pnrt of Lh� Mi�in . d�s<ritwd pr�niaes 1r1n8 +�th,i,ts tha boundaries of ro�dy and �i�7�• � 2. b.sw�t� ss ��t forth in d�ed froa Penay 4niLh, un- �arri�d� and 8eei1� Ruth L�.11�7i formeY� Besela Auih SM.ith� � urnu.trlyd� �rantsd to 1'igard `.:it�r Oietrict� recorded Ju1T 31�, , 19�7� in Oe�d Bodc 276� Pa�� 659, ae fo7lar�: li :3-��g�t �y � �oo� 443 �539 . � � �/ . �� 6T0-Co0�1 Q��`t.r.xn�r 2�n.�Tr *�°� ^-- " � _ " ^^ A � 3486'i' ■to��th.r rith an s+��nt o��r th• foa.lv�in; d��crib�d tr�at ot l�nei . b�ainain� �L thR 1�orth�Fei ooe'n�r of th� abv*� d�scrtbrd �op�rtyi thR:as Ba�i al.ana l.h� Vorth 1Ln� of Lot 5, 'fi!�atd- rill� Fi�1*:1t1, �-o L�• e�nt�r af Ktu�dock ►r.,,u�� tMr�e• 9ou�h aJ,on� said a�nt�r lin� a dlstanc� of 12 f��tj thena� waat and �z�ll�l �ith Lh� Nor1.h lir• of LoL S. �e th• �st lin• of th� aDe�• d��erlb�d tnct ot lar�df Lh•nc• 4orth a di�tanc� ot lZ fNt Lo th• �.c� of b�;1n.�1nS.' Aff�ct� �:orth 12 [t. Lot 5• 3. y��L� Lycludin; th• t�na L'Sd ��lSOns th.rr�l, . p-s,nt.�d ta Tigard '�atar Diatrict� r�cord�d 9�pte'ab�r 26, 1960, in Q��d 3ook 435, Pti� i99, or�r t�,• foLloring d�seri:+�d tract ot l�nd� ' •!h� Ye�L 1S ��OL al Lot � ir�d L;�� W��t 15 fKt o! th� sonth 2.j►1 chaina of Lot 3, Ti�ard�ill• H�lahti, '�laahin�ton C.ount�� Or•�n." . l, ?anar�a7 d Ern�at P. ftasDack. 5. Lonin6 ordlr+ar�c�s �rd Laprvrex�nt dl�triat�� il' a�. af. ard for Lh� aar��d purch+s� Dric• ot ?hirtT 'ihouaar+d aolljr■ (;30,000.0a) Stf larllil �onq ot th� Unit�d 3�+ts�, xZich sua th� T�nd�� hartb7r a��• to p�,� Lo Trndors •� Pvrtl�nd� Orvdrn+� to8��hsr ++ith int�T�at on th� nnpald pat�- tion th•rwt fran 1(u l, 1761 at Lh� rate o[ �lz p�r e�nt (6S) p�r annva n+V� +�1� a� follv+�st 2h• rure of S�r�n ?hou�and Ti�a }fi.utidr�d Oo�lars (:7�5�.�) la tash on th. r+c�cution of trtis a�ar�snt� tih� r�eelp� rher�of L h�r��y ialrnowl�d�d bp tM r�ndors, and th� bt�anc� ot 1'xen�rtvo Shouaand Pi�• FRir+d- �" zo�t �asa tbaA r�d bollsrs (f2Z�5�.�) � b� p�id i• follow+s �+o Tf+�oueand T�ro l�uidr�d �ut7 • and nc/),00 (�2�230.00) Doll.�r�� toaether �rith �ntareat on d�f�rr�d Dalane�� t t� nt� nt ai�c �+r ernt (6X) Par annw' frv� xa7 �� 1961, on Januar� 31, 1962, �ad a lilc� pa�mmt af prir�ipal 3nd irst�re�t on Lh. )lst dar of JaauasT ot •,►ch �Sar th�r��fter unt11 the �l1TC�u6• p:ic�� togethar Y1th interest th�r�on at a1s p�r c�nt (6¢i �r a.nnu.-o shall h.r. be.n paid in lull. �. T�� eo��s�t■ aryd �re�• to pa� eaid purchas• prie• a� h�T�in- b�ton flrv�id�d pronptlT a.'+d at tY:e Liae� arsd in th� a+sount� atipulsted. Z_ Y�� T��ts and sgrro�a to diecharg+ a]..1. Laz+� Mr�wlter 1�ri�Q er aas�es�d ag+�inst said pro�rt� pt�pf.l� and b.for• d�linqn�nc7 ttwrwf b�ainning rith te• g�ne.-al tax�� Cor th• fiseal tear camuertcina � �u1� 1� 1961, Lh� tues tor th� tax �•Rr 19b�--1961 io b� pror.t�d +a of %a� 1� 19b1. :�-��Ei -.,z- . x�� `g�� 4� �540 f" 6TO�t00� - --- Q��'"IZ2�Od 2IO�I.LT -- TZB± 5ZZ COS� 9S�CT 7.6-t0 �C0 � CITY OF TIGARD �'otntnzt�rity:1��e��pnr��it Slr�ipiu�ii-B��tt��r(onrnnurily� LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 9111/00 FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT[CUP12000-00002 FILE TITLE: CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CNURCH ADDITION APPLICANT/ Calvin Presbyterian Church ARCHITECT: Russell Leach OWNER: Ray Beyer Robert Gray Partners Inc. 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 1000 Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval to construct a 16,670 square foot addition. This addition is the last of a three-phase construction project. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 02800. ZONE: R-3.5. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: MaY17,2000 DuE: lune1,2000 ❑ STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: O HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: DATE lune26,2000 TIME:):OOPM O PLANNING COMMISSION [MON.1 DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL RUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION � VICINITY MAP 0 LANDSCAPING PLAN � NARRATIVE � SITE PLAN 0 ARCHITECTURAL PLAN STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner �503) 639-4171 ext. 407 CUP 2000-00402 CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH EXPANSION LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: �"�`�S G-+..�-�,� FOR Date: A LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE �NCOMPLETE GRADING �' Existing and proposed contours shown? �' Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes [�'�to �� Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES [� Right-of-way clearly shown? [� Centerline of street clearly shown? [� Name of street(s) shown? [� Exisring/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? �'� Profiles of proposed streets ��- Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partirions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? ❑ �� Traffic study required/submitted? [�' Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? (� Check widths proposed on public streets _�'° Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 61ot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. [J width appmpriate? �Other: SAN TARY SEWER ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? � N'°R'R'�''�"� ��i, ��% Stubs to adjacent parcels required? No TER ISSUES � ; Existing/proposed lines? rar aD�r�'s�t-� ;' Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? N�� `��> o ►`x� iNF° �t�N( Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? D��s Fa•Icai� '� �ter quality facility shown on plan? C re.-[�� ,n,��,,,A,�� q: does area provided match calculations for size requirement? C�ST� Swo�.. �a� Stubs to adjacent properties required? ❑ Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? . i:�eng5brianr�masters�public facility plan chedclist.doc � � ,�,. April 17, 2000 cmr oF r��ar� OREGON Ray Beyer Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW Canterbury Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Incompleteness letter for Calvin Presbyterian Church (CUP 2000-00002) Dear Mr. Beyer: This letter is to inform you that staff has received your application for Conditional Use approval for a 16,670 square foot addition onto the existing church. Staff has reviewed the materials submitted and finds that additional information is needed before the application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review before the Hearings Officer. The following information is needed for a complete application: • Submit preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility. This information must be from your design engineer to certify the adequacy of existing swales. • Provide information on existing and proposed water lines and fire ' hydrants. �•' Submit a copy of the USA service provider letter. In accordance with the USA design and Construction Standards which implements Metro Title 3, the City can not deem an application complete without the applicant first obtaining a service provider letter from USA. This requirement went into effect February 5, 2000. Once this letter is submitted verifying there are no sensitive site areas on this site, or within 200 feet, your application will be deemed complete. � Have the City generate a new mailing list. The application materials do not provide information on how the property owner mailing list was obtained. Even if the City generated this list for you (as is required) the list is only valid for 3 months. Because your neighborhood meeting was held over 8 months ago, the list used for that meeting is no longer valid. Please contact Patty Lundsford to have a new list generated. The cost is $11 plus $2 per sheet of labels. 13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 „.. Once the required information is submitted, staff will deem the application complete and schedule the public hearing. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, . ��,,�/ Julia Powell Hajd k Associate Planner c: CUP 2000-00002 file i:curpin/julia/Calvin Presbyterian.doc �; . . . .��,�� .,,. ��._.,,• ��° - „ � , � . . . �._. . . a ..�,, : , ""'� , , �u�.. . ,:i. ,, May 15, 2000 C� �F �G�� OREGON Ray Beyer Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW Canterbury Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Completeness letter for Calvin Presbyterian Church (CUP 2000-00002) Dear Mr. Beyer: This letter is to inform you that staff has received the additional information ` requested in our April 17, 2000 incompleteness letter. This letter is to inform you ! that staff has reviewed this information and has deemed your application � complete. Staff has tentatively scheduled the application for review before the Hearings Officer on June 26, 2000. Please note that this date is tentative. Notice will be mailed no later than 20 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, �� Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Plannei c: CUP 2000-00002 file i:curpin�ulia/Calvin Presbyterian acc2.doc y i � 9 g i i � 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 � � � � � � � � - _ _- _ _= -- = - - ��t • +��r�.��.,t�t��rt r ebruary 24, 200U Summary of Nei�hborhood Meetin� The meeting was held on August 30�' between 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM in the multipurpose room of Calvin Presbyterian Church. Four neighbors attended the meeting (see sign-up sheet). Pastor Gary Lawson, Ray Beyer, and Russell Leach (Architect) presented drawings and a scale model of the proposal. Concerns that were expressed and discussed covered: A. Privacy—Relationship of windows to adjacent houses(north). No second story windows are proposed facing residences. B. Light and glare—Location of windows and exterior lighting. C. Sound control—Methods of insulation and location of openings. No new parking or traffic impacts. D. Drainage—no change in drainage patterns or method of disposal. Increase in impervious surface is minimal (4,100 sq. ft.)The discussions were cordial and no opposition to the project was expressed. Report submitted by: ussell L. Leach, Architect P.O. BOX 1000 • SHERWOOD, OREGON 97140 • (503) 692-4675 • FAX(503) 692-9292 • CCB# 65424 , . ,-- 2S110AD 00310 2S110AD 01200 2S110AD 02010 Evelyn Conrad CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSO David&Barbara Crist 10631 SW Canterbun�Ln 8-1�9 SW Barbur Bl��d 14672 S�V 106Th A�-e Tigard Or 9722� Portland Ur 97219 Tigard Or 97224 2S11UAD 02110 2S111BC 02600 2S110AD 09-400 Joan Dreyer TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Matthe��& Monique El`� 1-1678 SW 106Th Ave 88�11 SW Commercial St 16283 SW Sexton Mountain Dr Tigard Or 9722# Tigard Or 97223 Beaverton Or 970U7 2S110AD 08700 2S110AD 0#201 2S111BC 0-1300 Nancy Tanner Lorene Invin Randy&Janette Wilder 307 Pond Ridge Ln 1�63� SW 106Th Ave 1��-11 S`V 100Th Ave Urbana Il f 1802 Tigard Or 9722-� Tigard Or 9722� 2S111BB 01000 2S111BC 03100 2S111BC 00900 Mary Reeder Kelly&Kathleen Timmins Cathleen Matias 1=1300 SW 103Rd Ave 1�1335 SW 103Rd Ave 1�3�80 SW 103Rd Ave Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722=t Tigard Or 9722� 2SI11BC 02300 2S111BC 02303 2S111BC 02302 Gary& Gay Fantz Kathy Evelyn Nokes John Richard&Evel}�n Nokes 1-1530 SW 103Rd A��e 1-1600 SW 103Rd Ave 1�3650 SW 103Rd Ave Tigard Or 9722-1 Tigard Or 9722-1 Tigard Or 9722-� 2S110AD Od20-t 2S110AD 0-t203 2S110AD 017U0 Robert& Sharon Behrendt Charlene Smoole Patricia Garrison 14�0 S Kihei Rd#C20� 14615 SW 106Th Ave 14620 SW 106Th Ave Kihei Hi 967�3 Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722�4 2S110AD 0-i202 2S110AD 01800 2S110AD 0=4100 Doreen Ewing Scott&Peggy Brown Susan Galyen 14625 SW 106Th Ave 14630 SW 106Th Ave 14641 SW 106Th Ave Tigard Or 9722-4 Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722=4 2S110AD 04000 2SIl0AD 03900 2S110AD 01910 Evelyn Thompson Gilda& Charles Burks lohn Haase 1�647 SW 106Th Ave 1�36» SW 106Th Ave 1=4666 SW 106TIi A��e Tigard Or 9722-t Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722�3 `�, 2S110AD 02200 2S111BC 02700 2S110AD 08600 Ann Uhler Gregory&Jonette Gleaves Tom&Eleanor Fisher PO Box 230�2 10380 SW Canterbury Ln 10�0� S�V Canterbury Ln Tigard Or 97281 Tigard Or 9722� Tigard Or 9722�1 2S110AD 01500 2S110AD 01600 2S110AA U1�00 Michael Hadley Pamela McMonagle OREGON FOUNDATION INC 10540 SW Canterbun�Ln 10550 SW Canterbury Ln 520 S�V 6Th Ave Tigard Or 9722-1 Tigard Or 9722� Portland Or 9720-t 2S110AD 01110 2S110AD 01000 2S110AD 00900 Kendall Graham Jacqueline Powell Stephanie Ntontgomer}- ' 1061� SW Canterbury� Ln PO Boa 23322 10619 S�V Canterbun•Ln Tigard Or 9722-1 Tigard Or 97281 Tigard Or 97224 2S110AD 00810 25110AD 00700 2S110AD 00610 Douglas& G�vendol}�n`Vhitmore Linda McPherson Da��id Komer 1�803 SW 106Th A��e 10623 S�V Canterbun�Ln 1062� SW Can[erbun�Ln Tigard Or9722# Tigard Or97224 Tigard Or9722-4 2S 110AD 00�10 2S 110AD OO�100 2S 110AD 00200 Donald&Nancy Cole S Carolyn Long Yvonne Stansbury 1122� SW Chickadee Ter 10629 SW Canterbury Ln 10633 SW Canterbury Ln Beaverton Or 97007 Tigard Or 9722� Tigard Or 9722� 2S110AD 00100 2S111BC 00800 2S111BC 02200 Charla Marie Stratton Alvin& Carla Renick Troy& Susan Schmidt 10635 SW Canterbury Ln 1017� SW Inez St 10190 SW Inez St Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722-� 2S111BC 01500 2S111BC 01200 2S111BC 01100 Michael&Diane Mudrow Grant&Lana Williams Gregory Karpstein 10185 SW View Ter 10190 SW View Ter 10220 SW View Ter Tigard Or 9722-� Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 97224 2S111BC 01600 2S111BC 01700 2S111BC 01000 Francis Ruth Sargant Richard Judith Stack C Wayne Bauman 10225 SW View Ter 10265 SW View Ter 10270 SW View Ter Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722-� Tigard Or 97224 2S111BC 0-i000 2S111BC 03200 2Sl l 1BC 03900 Judith&Paul Miller Martha Pruett Be��erly Raudy 10330 SW Vie�v Ter 10335 S�V Vie�v Ter 10360 SW View Ter Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 97224 Tigard Or 9722�1 2S111BC 03300 2Sll1BC 03800 2S111BC 03=�OU Douglas Ed«�ard Johnson Miriam&Daniel Bertuleit William Gosselin 10375 SW View Ter 10390 SW View Ter 10-10� SW Vie�v Ter Tigard Or 9722� Tigard Or 9722-4 Tigard Or 9722� r 2S111BC 03700 2S111BC 03600 2S111BC 03001 Ronald&Karen Fairlev Stephen Christopher Bates John&Nlargaret Dunklee 10�120 SW Vie��Ter 10-130 SW View Ter 10440 SVV View Ter Tigard Or 9722�4 Tigard Or 9722-t Tigard Or 9722� 2S111BC 03500 2S111BC 02900 Don Andrew Myers Irnin&Patricia Boehr 10445 SW View Ter 10�170 SW Vie�v Ter Tigard Or9722-1 Tigard Or9722� � � � ' = G A R Y M . L A W S 0 N - P A S T 0 R To: Calvin's Neighbors From: Pastor Gary Lawson Calvin Presbyterian Church Regarding: Proposed classrooms and multipurpose room addition to the church. August 12, 1999 Dear Neighbor, We are in the process of formulating a design for a building addition to the north side of the sanctuary. You are c�rdi�ily invited to an infiormal meeting at the church un August 30, 19�G, afi 7:U0 prn for a pre;entatien ef aur tho��ghts and plans rollowed by your comments, inp;.�t and concer�s. This proposed addition is the 3�d integral part of our 1991 master plan. Phases 1 and 2 were previously completed. Parking and traffic should not be impacted by the addition. Required parking for churches is based solely upon the seating capacity of the sanctuary. Accessory and subordinate spaces, such as this proposed addition, have a much lower parking demand and generally are not in use during sanctuary services. It is our sincere desire to continue to be good neighbors. See you on August 30t'' Yours truly, 'V(�, �ati1��- _ / Qastor Gary La�vson In your neighborhood . . . for you 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane • Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 • (503) 639-3273 � � � �� (�� GARY M. LAW50N �'`�, � - Pastor DALE E.SOUTHORN � Associate Pastor r �� -e�-�.�/ ��-�i �� `� � � " ,a.l♦ ...� « �`��_ �j � • .. �. � _ �� ::�i`��-. . -�'� , _A. ti?� � � r a «� 1��t��e.c,�' 7_�r�r� ��-� fLi �`t� !n your neighborhood . . . for you 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane • Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 • (503) 639-3273 • FAX (503) 603-0703 �^p o s c�. ► �..r�c� � v'� Narrative The pre-application conference notes (pages 1 through 9) are previously addressed in order following: 18.510 Zoning Dimensional Requirements 18.730 Special Building Height Provisions 18.705/18.765 Parking Areas and Walkway Requirements 18.795 Clear Vision Area 18.745 Buffering and Screening 18.745/18.765/18.705 Landscaping 18.780 Sign Permits 18.790 Tree Removal and Mitigation 18.390 Impact Study The following code chapters were checked for discussion in the pre-app. notes (page 7 of 9) and are not previously discussed. 18.330—Conditional Use This proposal is a major modification of an existing conditional use. Although this proposal is not part of an approved, phased development, it has been presented to the community and the hearing examiner as a part of the 1991 Calvin Master Plan in previous 1992 and 1994 development phases. 18.330.030—Approval Standards 1. The site size and dimensions are adequate for this proposed addition. 2. The impacts of the proposed addition are minimal. 3. All public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the addition. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met. 5. This proposaUaddition is in compliance with Sec. 18.330.050—Additional Development Standards. . • r For religious institutions all existing setbacks substantially exceed minimum ' requirements and the proposed addition at 45 ft. from the rear property line exceeds the minimum setback of 20 ft. 18.360—Site Development Review This proposal is a major modification (addition) to an existing development. The proposal would add 16,600 sq. ft. of building area—More than 10% (18.360.080-B- 8). No other evaluation criteria(B1 through 11) applies. 18.360.080— Exceptions to Standards No exceptions to standards as outlined in A, B, C or D apply. Although the parking standard for the main assembly space in a religious institution has changed,this portion of the institution is not proposed for modification and therefore the existing parking ratio is unchanged. 18.510—Residential Zoning Districts The underlying and surrounding zoning district is R 3.5. A Conditional Use permit is required for a major moditication per table 18.510. 18.755—Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclable Storage Calvin Presbyterian Church has an existing mixed solid waste and recyclable storage area at the Northwest corner of the on-site paved areas. Calvin's franchised hauler has provided containers in a location that meets the providers collection requirements. The proposed building addition will not require additional solid waste or recycle facility. 18 800—Street and Utilitv Improvement Standards The proposed addition does not affect or require any street or public utility improvements. ` �_ IcD�.o uE.� TeN _ ��:o• 9 � { .. .._-_. _ . . ___ ___—_�� "w�. . � �� f, �j.� _h&��-� I �� °'gc_ I ��C��___ . I '� ��.��.— _ -j-�-�--�- ._s�'a�._ '•�...� ��r.. �"", I < —�� cw c^�-•w` ,� c �,,..; � � � �y; . ��:f� 1��5;_��/� . �. -�w�.x2,�_r.�,-v -�y,�.2��i'G�Lt,�� c¢re.r,cr.5 4,m I'T ----�-- ---� �3-r -- , F"-m s,��eyn.,s as.vm,..m+ �F.za._..NS) - ^ I � ; �,z , Neav c�rtcp 1.n.�pyC� . EaCyT�J[. v.w+oYwPC L+C+�ST�rxa mP' N�lwr ,�---' FM..ST.,� � � �2'7r�2E+.1 AwawO CriDML FF✓/g6 � � crz.�,;ay;.a• c..�aa ti.c n�.acyS �ewa� rrscv�..�E �, G( �� r------ � � �� — � — � . I _ 0 G.� - _ •� ' _ _ _ -_.._ . � . 3 ' d . . ♦� T I _ ' — - � j � 0 /'�1ti�uTr.fC II Fr �� Srqku.FZ ��; — � f 0 I H`RY.iNL 1� P2L-y.�yq� — _- - __ . I i �! RsY aRey.,p g' ,� � � � � � �`` _ �R,�E � � °� �� _Y„� _ p �a.,;�� II . II' I ' � ._I - I •9 �'I I ��; � S�cEwnuL d � ' I �w�wi�.IG � � ' ��. NRiI ,woi i �. II i. RFIr.cfi�l { -'•L IS OM�N � . �� p flY�%i 0'b T � � I �T�� '___.- l��iERiwYj-PM�Ep � �. � - I __� � .°+�ID IUU.V � � I I - � e�opeD. - � _�,. I �w.+vu.w�r� I . TL 'i l� 51*�b�TI eN � .. '�'!T RMF"s J PAWI�+NG t�T _�.m� � -- _ _ ' . _ - I .�SPren�T� . I � . � _— __ � � � — .a—_ - _� �� - � � —_ . . � '' � . _ GRs m.s ( r r � � �'' p ,.3 ��T� I rsnrne). ';/ \��, �I �c! N�. � .� �� l�\ ' - \\\�; I - I C '� �U i �0 � - j � �'� 7 .. � _ A ..�� e.r��u� c.wv��l 1 � 0 � . "''-��.1 r � ��ti� �'�`� �+wr+ur a,u.o��u, - � v ��f�moa ' I - �� .�l � (TMO Ro2TSi.1 �I I I � V �, " '�, _ ;� '.I� \\�� -..m� .....,.. .. .. � Cs'.m[Ywvia9 IrJ ,.{ ��.�� , t � i i9o4) � � U � � � � �� /. �... � � � � � I +'� U U o � � �' � - � ' c o� N ' '`.� � i : — I � .� �i i -- --� '.0 —— �`'�; _�.�r,,.,� °— 3 a� _ � �T�q.�,.,-v � �,; O � , - t�� a o�-�N-c or.l j � � ��", �\� / ; ( ,ti� ; F..o,��-r, � ,n 'O ��•� . . / F��r�w o f v 6 '� �rp.� tiufsS � : N � . (wr�a+.o snwva) �� + ' � � � /�,.... � ,�' ��..�� i� _ __-—___-_ __ . .� _ �� - -____.__.- �� —_ __ _ . _._ —� �'� _ - '•'h_� ' '___.__ _ �� ' ' \L�.: �1l1cKv:�.�fs 5�,5"'. pr7 v Gw W Gfi+vGYMI� _ . ___ ._ _._--.____.— .. . . J_ .. - -____.. .___. ` _._ .'__--_- .-" C. '___—. ---_-_._—__ "� -7 �I'f�__F'LA r! Pt201°oS�J -- G.bbl-f loh� __ _, _ 2c -- ---- ' �o,CTH I�U��" S W �ANTE,Z?ouZY L,4N� �� G — � --.-__��'----. _. � �;;�rutw!� . ��C ti� A �> �o �c � a r � 11 I � I ' =_ ---- __- -- - ��t • ��2.,S�1'�� May 8,2000 RECEIVEp�LANNING Ms. Julia Powell Hajduk MAY 10 Associate Planner 2QQ0 City of Tigard i312s s.w.��l sl�a. C�N OF T��qRD Tigard, OR 97223 Regarding: CUP 2000-00002 Your letter(4-17-00)to Ray Beyer @ Calvin Presbyterian Church Dear Julia: Attached is the information that you requested to complete our application in 1994. 1. Sisul Engineering designed the water quality detention system to accommodate this last nhase of development. 5ee Sisul attached letter. 2. In 1994, Sisul Engineering designed a water system that included a new fire hydrant at the west property line 160 ft. north of Canterbury Lane. This new hydrant was installed to maintain required distances for the 1994 sanctuary addition as well as this last phase addition. No change is proposed or required for the meter or water service to the building. Construction will be type V-one-hour(no fire sprinkler system). See Sisul drawing 1/3 dated May 1994 3. USA service provider letter is attached. 4. The new mailing list and stamped, addressed envelopes are attached. I trust that this information will complete the application submittal. We are an�cious for a hearing at the earliest possible date. Yours truly, i � Russell L. L.each Archited for Caivin Presbyterian Church P.O. BOX 1000 • SHERWOOD, OREGON 97140 • (503) 692-4675 • FAX(503) 692-9292 • CCB# 65424 i S U L E N G I N E E R I NG A Dii.�sion o Sisul E�tter rises I�7c. I P . 375 PORTLAND AVENUE, GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 (503) 657-0188 April 25, 2000 FAX(503)657-5779 Robert Gray Partners, Inc. PO Box 1016 Sherwood, OR 97140 ATTN: Russ Leach RE: Calvin Presbyterian Church; J.O. 94-042 Dear Russ: It appears, based upon our preliminary calculations of your proposed addition to Calvin Presbyterian Church, that there is enough surplus storage available in the water quality facility along the north property line that no enlargement will be necessary. Please be aware though that the surplus storage that we have calculated is only slightly larger than what is needed based upon this new impervious area. Further verification may be necessary if the building changes or other impervious improvements are required. Should you have questions, please feel free to call me. Sinc �ely, 1 � _ / ._r,G!(c:/ta%��- �-- � ! Thomas J. �isul, P.E. TJS/lae Enc. CA� VIN��5��'�'��4N CHUR C�I 9�-04� April 24, 2000 STORM DRAINAGE AND I�T�A TER Q UA L I T Y CA L CULA TIONS FOR NEW ADDITION ----------------------------------------- ��p P ROF s�i ��' ��'�N �2 + `�,8 � � - � F� � �� J� ti��A S�, 5��, . Sisul Engineering 375 Portland Avenue Gladst.�ne, OR 97027 (503) b57-0188 � , , CALVIN PRESB�'TERIAN CHURCH (J.fl. 9�1--�2} W�TER QUALITY CALCULATIONS FOR NEW ADDITiON: � The new addition will add approximately 0.10 Ac. of impervious area to the site. All of the new impervious area will drain into the Norih Swale. Additional Runoff Volume: 0.36 in. - mean summer time storm (from original calculations) 0.]0 Ac. - im�ervious area added by the addition 65% - phosphorous removal rec�uired (from ori�inal calculations) Volume = (0.36 in.)(lft/12 in.)(0.10 Ac.)(43,560 ft./1 Ac.)(0.65) Volume = 85 cu. ft. Extra Stora�e in tiorth Sw�le: The existing north swale was designed to infiltrate the mean summer time storm with the water level at the top of the aravel intiltration ditch that runs under the open swale. The overtlow catch basin at the east or downstream end of the swale is 3" above the bottom of the swale at the upstream end. Therefore, there is 3" of extra storage at the upstream end of the swale, and takin� into account the 1% slope of the swale over the 65' length, there is 10.8" of extra stora�,e at the downstream end. The bottom of the swale is 3' wide. A calculation of the extra storage volume is ;iven below. Extra Storage =(3")(1 ft./12 in.){;ft)(65 ft) + '/z(7.8")(1 h./12")(3 ft.)(65 ft.) Extra Stora;e = l 1 Z cu. ft. Summarv• —� The new addition will add 0.10 Ac. of impervious area. This requires an additional storage volume of 85 cu. ft. The existing north swale was designed with an extra storage volume of 112 cu. ft. T'herefore, there is adequate stora�e in the north swale to handle the add�tianal runoff. '� �� 1 �� • � � � Sensitive Area Pre-Sc Unified Sewerage Agency reening Site Assessment of Washington County . Jurisdiction �ir Date - ----- ---- Map & Tax Lot �1 �_ � - �g6 p Owner �'y� a _�,,�� Site Address � �- � �— g� Contact P�.►�.5a�, Proposed Activity '�j�_ Address Q � --�-�.� °L�c, t�o 0 ----== �.. ��10 oc.r.�0� c►��y�.n - ---- - - Phone �/ �Z-`�7a`IS---F__�-°�3.��i��- Y N NA Y N NA � � � Map # omposite Map �J' � ❑ ❑ � Stormw ter Infrastructure maps QS # � � � Locally adopted studies or maps Other Specify � � � Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of USA Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: � � Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. � Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your � property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PR�VIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: '� Date: E:UdminlDeslgn anAConslrucfion SlwrdardsUR Phone LoglFormslRevise�l Pre-Screenirtg Fo�m 4-/7-OO.doc '!+�.y�_ i .--_ _----- ,, __ , �_--._ — �;* —. -- --- � "^r^-- --- -- � i . . .. . . . . . . . -- � . ..� � . . . � . . . . . . . � �.�� . , ..� ---- .. . . . .. _ I � I .. y::� ,... , I �� ..� � .. .- ,'. � . � � � � . . ... . ... .. .. � � — -` - — I_. . _-. . _ . . ca�� . . . - . . . . . . „. _ �,,. . ,. . . . . v,.si�i" . .. � . � . ._ . . .' ._— • . � ��. . . - .. . ,. �—_ �} ' V�6+ifY V IE l .�;. — -- ___. 25111 BCU2840 � � i ---- —� � .__ l� �-�-�-h. -- - ----�►�� . : - �L�11 ; � �, J , J . i , ;� --- -_ ---- -- _- r , ---- , , ��; ; ; , � , - __:_ _ -- CANTERBURY '�`�� __,_ � t_ . -�-_ ._ _-� ' � ----- --�-�- i : �� _I � -�--_ _ - � ,�� _ �_ � � �-� � ______� _ I PEMBROO- �_ � _ - � - , I 1 I .. O � �- ._ . . M � -- � - -� � - -- � � : �� o � , � �� -- � - ___ � �� ; �_- ;-_.., w __ - --- - i ; � _ . I � I i I LL}� � � C�7�L� _ - _-I _�_-_-_---_ - � -- - Mu3DO��-__�_ �- � � l � -- _.-- __ ------ I- �� --___ � E� -- �--_._ �---__ _.--__ -- -- I . -- _ �_ � i i 1 I �--- ,�. t ! , � � �--� I ____ T�---- `__. I . :. � Fa a ; __ � �I , _�---L--- . _ --� � _ r � aI � � I __ o _, L� �� __ � , -- �I — ; �� -� . ____ �.__ ___ � I i-_ ___;_ - � � � ____. � � ____ _ � _ __ _____ _ __. _ _ _ _______. C� _ DEL MONTE � _ _ __ _ __--�-__- - - - -- � , � T--- I i Q� `T i i LLi (�1� - __-- � -- �_ I I ; 1� [ZTl� -- i I ! ' _ -- _-1-�--___ .�_._.. � i -: � ______.__--- � � -- �_.. _. --- l _ , --- ----- r-__ � -- -- - - --�-- \ �-- - . — ��- -- \ � -- ��zz � -..:°�. ,.. A '� � � . - —1 .er.s.�s.x .,,,.��'...�i�?''.`i. �� _._._�_ .__.— ._--- ---.—___.� i � I `__—�_ v��,�_ - . . �—_ _ . . � � � . � . . ' � . ' � � �SFU� IBC . � � �31��0 � i . � � � I �, . . � � . � � . 25'wt}$C � �ytU1tBC I 'S1UItBf. . ' n�z�� , � - ; ��utlfi'�= i 03�rC 03?OC i i 25jUItBG 030Q� � i �15�0 ; 2Stu�tftG 25��uttBC � ± Q1390 616d� 2S1U1t�C k � � ��,11J�IEC 61GOQ � I O"3:OL� � �-� I I � � � � ,'` � � I �� jfR :, ��; T----- `" �� .� �, ,. i � �' � �� \ zs,a,,ec_ �' � 013QQ �S'u.t1BC I � ,29C�C I � 25+.11�t6C � `0�DOC 25tuItEC �ylw!i9C L 25}Vt18C �SICItiSE �� . � �S�U .EC ; p37t�0 � � n�.3o� SJUt iBC I �j3E.i�: ' j C_U00 plOOt3 Q110� 01��0 ' ;�� j � � i � � � � � � �� ;' , . � zstui}ec 2s�u�tac zs�u��ec aos� o��oti 00940 _�,..._---� �qiU11Bl. � � � . � � . . . � . � O�R�G i — i i � t��D, � � ` 2S:t ut 1BC 2�i-urt �s�u:, �ec o2zao oz,o � a�aoo �, : � i � - , � . i � _ Z5 14't 16C � � z�� u,o oz�oo 100 �0150 I i 251uttBC . �I D2303 251tt]t8C . . . � � I � . � .,c.�w„Qr �. � , �� --- � • I�� CITYOFTIGARD � . � � � . _� PRE-APPLICATION COHFERENCE HOTES C�u�n�taiDev�La�nt y p [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six i6l Monthsl ShapinflA BettcrCommunity _�— — -- �- NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: STAFF AT PRE-APP.: � APPLICANT: C�t(a/i(�l ��"C�,,�N C�;Ei��{ AGENT: �� C��1a��Z+�l Phone:[ l Phone: [ l �-t Z r l�"-TS PROPERTY LOCATION: ADORESS/GEN.LOCATION: S�( rz� � TAX MAP[Sl/LOT#iSl: � / NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: — ) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: �SC'7C � ' 'CrJ � i COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP�ESIGNATION: �� i5�Ct1 ��i� ZONING MAP UESIGNATION: �—� •� C.I.T.QRFA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: [5031 IONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:,►cT sq. ft. Average lot width:��ft. Maximum building height:�ft. Sethacks: Front�ft. Side S ft. Rear��ft. Corner�d ft. from street. MAXIMUM S TE COVERAGE: �_% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:�_%. [Refer to Code Section 18.— t.,�0�21 � ADOITIONAL LOT UIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is create the minor d partition process. Lots created part of a partition must have a m of 15 feet of frontage have a minimum 15-foot wide cess easement. � The DEPTH F ALL LOTS L NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less t ' ' es the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARO Prealpplication Co�e�ence Notea Page 1 of 9 NoN�•sIA•at1a1�ppllcauea/Pl�aalaa olvlsloa Sectlo� SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ STREETS: � feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWE INTENSITY ZONES: feet, a site's boundary. ➢ FLAG OT: 1 -FOOT IDE YARD S K. [Ref r to Code Chapter SPECIAL BUILDING NEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a � height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. IRefer to Code Section 18.130.Ot0.BJ PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: � �tf 2 S�4s �r� N�c�..� �zv2r�,�. d�� Par{cing SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): �--��f�, c��Y�' S�un�r -- SECONDARY USE R D parking: .�_�� Parking S� on preliminary plan(s): i NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum perce�tage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parki�g: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: • All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage pa�king areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.165 and 18.7051 CtTY OF TIGARD Prealpplicatian Conference Motes Page 2 oi 9 � M�M��sli��tlal MOIIaUoUMaaalu��Mslo�Satla i WAII(WAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE ' GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide nvenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.105.0301 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Eve COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS , FEET shall be provid d with a loading space. The space size cation shall be as approved by the City Enginee . [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 CLEAR VISION AREA � The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the �equired clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 BUFfERING AND SCREENIN6 � In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE �R VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer a�eas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. � [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 � �� cSFfr� � C��s QG'�C�Q S�� The REQUIRED BUFFER WI which are applicable to your proposal area are as �011obvs: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: �NDSCAPIN6 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are mo�e than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of t least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.7051 CIiY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Ce�erencc ilotes Page 3 of 9 � MON��sld�Wal ApplltaUeUM�aala9 OhAslo�S�ctl�� SIGt� SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of . Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or � height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Cade Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE IANDS . The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOP ENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAG AYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, �R ON UNSTAB GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identi sensitive lands areas at the pre- applicatio conference based on available information. HOWE ER, �he responsibility to precisely identi nsitive lands areas nd th ir bo n ari s is the res n i ili f th t Ar as meetin the definiti ns of sen itive lands must be I arl indicated on with the develo ent a lication. Chapte 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, ection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. ESIDENTIAL DEVEL PMENT I PR D WITHIN FL DPLAINS. [ efer to Code Chapter 18.715] STEEP SLOPES When S P SLOPES ' , prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted w resses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon fleld exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USAI BUffER STANDQRDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Desi n Crit ria: The VEG ATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the fined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency o City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be irected to an area of the vegeta ' or th 'nimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum Ilowable encroachme I e 15 feet, except as allowe � Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 per �he l o the vegetated corridor within the develop nt or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the veget ed corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restriction in th Ve etat orridor: NO structures, deve opment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, ap lication of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted hich otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated coRidor, except allowed below: ➢ A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be wi ened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructe closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the A�e y or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existi g vegetation; and ➢ WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated cor idor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPL PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corrid r shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the co struction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design far SWMI ' CITY OF T16AR0 Prealpplicat�on CaMerence ilatrs Page 4 ef 9 NON��sl�eatlal�epllcatloUMaaala��Ivlsloa S�ctl�e WA1'rER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard . Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wild'life habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource ar s. Safe Harb r: The WR VERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 Natural Resources) and the °safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, D' ision 23). These provisions require that °significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapp and protected. The Tualatin Rive�, which is also a °fish-bearing stream,° has an average annu flow of more than 1000 cfs. , Ma' Streams . Str ms which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor reams: Streams ich are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Mino s in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and ce ain s f the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM A PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF A ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparia corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBAC IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FE T, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (incl ing adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" i required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the ity of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 Riparian SeWack Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTIO OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH A 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces othenNise prohibited by this ch ter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured throu h streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the rip rian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, th applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time thi regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study requir d by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on ite riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on- ite riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setbac area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions f Section 18.85.050 �egulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF iIGARO Pro�lpplicabon Co�erence No[es Page S of 9 MON�ssId��U�l AppllcaWa/Maa�1�q ihAslaa S�etl�a ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. � [Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 TREE REMOYAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS ��,1(��C� A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTI REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. � THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the followin�: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in � caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: � Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; � Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that fwo-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; � Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; a Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Directo� may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural � resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: � The number of re�lacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the larg est reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a �eplacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Secbon 18.190.060.E1 CtTY OF TICARD Prealpplicatlan CoMerence Notes Page 6 ef 9 MaM�a.:lae�tl�l�polle�tlao/ll,a�laY YM:1.�S�eao■ NARRATIYE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable . approval standards. Failure to Provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.321 CODECHAPTERS ✓18.330 � 18.390 _ 18.520 18.715 � 18.765 �8.795 18.350 18.420 18.530 � 18.730 18.775 8.797 �18.360 18.430 18.620 18.745 _ 18.780 �8.800 _ 18.370 .�18.510 �18.705 � 18.755 ? 18.790 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE � IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public faciliry system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sectians 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHBORH000 MEETIN6 � THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout conceming site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting vour application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighbarhood Meebng HandouU SUBDIVISION LAT NQME RESERVATION PRI TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVIS 1�D�S PPLICATION with the City of Tigard, appl' nt's a�e required to comple d file a subdivision pa ' request with the Washington Cou t Surveyor's Office i rder to obtain approval/reservation o -subdivision name. Ap i ions will not be epted as complete until the City receives the axed confirmation of app ov from the Co y of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [C eyar's O�ce: 503-648-8884] BOILDIN6 PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determi�e if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Ci�'s olic i to a I those s stem development credits to the first building�ermit issued in the development (UNLE S OTHER ISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CIiY OF flGARD Prealpplication Conference Notes Page 1 at 9 NON-iesld�aU�l�pw1lc�Uoa/M�ealu0 Olvlsloe S�ctloa REC�CLIN6 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE . SERVICING CQMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing � with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Cade Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEHTS: ; �2 .� G5 PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. � Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. . APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Anplications submitted by mail or dro�ped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. A�plications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days• Maps submitted with an a�plication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8 5 by 11 inches One (11 8'/z" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. A�plication with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete withiri 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff a�e issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is avai able from the Planning Division upon request. CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Co�erenc�Motes Page=ef 9 NON��slde�tlal�ppllcaU�a/Maeolay OhAslea S�ctl�a This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the p�ospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code ' requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of gaod site planning that should apply to the develapment of your site plan. Failure of the staff to prouide information required 6y the Code shall not constiwte a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended tl�at a prospectiue applicant either o6tain and read the Community Deuelapment Code or asK any questions of Ci� staff relatiue to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPQREO BY: ��`T�� • i�OK-7F�S CITY Of TIGARO PIANNIN6 DNISION - STAFf PERSON HOLOING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: [5031639-d111 FA)L• [5031684-7297 E-MAIL• cs��rs r��a��@ci.tlgard.or.us i:1cu rpl nUna sterslrevi sed�prea ppc.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ UpdateC: Jun.7,99 CIiY OF TtGARU Pre-Applicatlea CaMc�nce Notes Page 9 ef 9 MOM��sW�atlal�pP11t�Uoa/Ma�d�!�hAsl��iatlu .�:� PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �w�,; ➢ EHGINEERING SECTION Q �o�"ry�,°'��°°t s��r�c�m�y PUBLIC FACILITIES �� G c�,�..�..z��.c�,.�, The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appltcadon Caaference Notes - Page 1 at 6 EoDleeerla'Bep�rt�e.t S�etlo� ( ) strec. .nprovements will be necessary alc , � to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concretecurb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street siyns, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) �2•) ( ) Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CIT1f OF T16ARD Pre-Apppcatlon Conferenca Notes Page 2 of 6 Ea9�pserlog Baputne�t Seetl�p _._,'Y�! are on the opposite _ �e of the street from the site. If thE a in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to � $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . P�ior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitarv Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) g inch line which is located �� a�� a� . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sew r. It is the developer's responsibility to �N►.��T AAr�-t�g.t v� c�.r.�._ �c7C�N �-p� �R— R�..��c.- �L_ . Water Supalv: ,�� µi�� The C�; aF t - Phone:(503) �3`�- `{{�� " provides public water service in th area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: .�` ��,� Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: ��,►��#�II, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. � ` P6aP� t' Pc��i T u�. � A�6A � � No �� r�l�--��a.� �L€� wc�� fS� �� . _ Storm Water Qualit� The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITII OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Coafereace No[�s Page 3 of 6 Fa01��srla!o�p�ftosnt Stctlo� • newly created impervious � ,aces. The resolution contains a p sion that would allow an applicant �to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will � be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: (4J�£onstruction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. �- ►��A Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of buildin4 permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. �'A�( �Ti I PERMITS En.inq eering Department Permits: � Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CIT110f TIGARO Pre-Appllcatlon Comerence Notes Page 4 of 6 En9ln�sda4 Bepanmsot SeeUo� • In addition, the per,._..cee will be required to post a bor ,r similar financial security for the � work. . � Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all �� grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a perFormance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit Is required,the applicant must obiain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commerciaf, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, includ�ng sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and �eturn a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CRY OF T16ARD Pro-Applicatlon Com�rence Notes Page 5 af 6 Fillu�rl�0�e��r�oset Ssctlo� ' GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS F0._ _JBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The . engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the constn.�ction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four comers of the building. PREPAREU BY: g �� EN EERING DEPAR NT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-7297 h:�patt�Miasters�preapp.eng (Master section:preap�r.mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Appllcatlon Comerence Notes Page 6 of 6 Eo0lae�du!Dep�rtoeetE�ctlo� CITY OF TIGARD • LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Piease �ead this form ca�efully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- apnlication conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff pe�son named low at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: _ Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION � ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: � Completed Application Fomi with property owners signature or name of agent and letter of authorization � Title transfer instrument or grant deed � Written summary of proposal � Na�rative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and app�oval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) � Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size,add�essed with 1"x 4"labels � Documentary evidence of neighborfiood meeting (if requi�ed) � Impact Study pe�Section 18.390.040.6.2.(e) � Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes � Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information,each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PIANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Sectio� 5 of this checklist provides details on what infonnation to include on each plan): Q� Vcinity Map [3� Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan � Existing Conditions Map � P�eliminary U6lities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map [� P�eliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Pa�tition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan �❑ T�ee Preservation/Mitigatio� Plan � Site Development Plan q�A�chitectural Drawings E� Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends �n� type of review p�ocess. fOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES __1i,PV' COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. �7 City of Tigard Land Use Applicatio�Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES ANO REPORTS . Because of the natu�e of youc p�oject and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONA�STUDIES WILL BE REQUIREO. These studies must be p�epa�ed by ce�tified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: , ❑ Traffic Study � ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ WetlandslStream Coiridor Delineation and Repo�t ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation � ❑ � StoRn Drai�age System Dow�stream Analysis Q� P�elimi�ary Sizi�g Calculations fo�Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Faality ❑ Geotechnical Repo�t ❑ Othe� — 5. PREPAR(NG PLANS AND MAPS Pla�s and maps should be prepa�ed at a� engineering scale (1' = 10/20/50/1001200')and include a �orth a�row, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all you� pla�s. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan o� subdivisio� plat to be shown o� a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepa�ed af an a�chitectu�al scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8%z x 11 format THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PIAN (If the pla�s you submit do not include all of the infofmation requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map `� ��4�-s �, � � � Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Sunounding street system including nearby i�tersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transif stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map � Pa�cel boundaries,dimensions and g�oss a�ea ❑ � Co�tour lines(2'i�tervals for 0-10°/a slopes o�5'for slopes >10°/a) ❑ � Drainage pattems and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ � Potential natural hazard areas induding: • Floodplai�a�eas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal wate�table within 24"of the surface for th�ee o�mo�e weeks of the yea� ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • A�eas with seve�e soil erosion potentia! ❑ • Areas having seve�ely weak foundatio� soils ❑ � Locations of resou�ce areas induding: • wldlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wedands � � Othe�site features: • Rock outcroppings � • T�ees with Z 6"calipe�measured 4'from g�ou�d level ❑ � Location a�d type of�oise sou�ces ❑ � Locations of existing sfructures and thei�uses ❑ � Locations of exisGng utilities and easements a � l.ocations of exisGng dedicated right-of-ways Cily of Tigard La�d Use Appliqtion Chedclist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map � The proposed�ame of the subdivision � � Vcinity map showing prope�ty's relatio�ship to a�terial and collector streets � � Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as aP�t�cab�e) ❑ � Scale, north ai-row a�d date � � Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided � Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owne�s of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ � Co�tou�li�es related to a City�stabfished benchmark at 2'intervals for 0-10°/a grades and 5'i�tervals for grades greater than 10°/a ❑ � The purpose,loca6o�,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements � • Public and private sanitary and sform sewer lines � • Domestic water mains inGuding fire hydrants � • Major powe�telephone tra�smissio� lines(50,000 volts or greate�) � • Watercourses ❑ • Oeed reservations for parks,ope� spaces, pathways and otfier land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all t�ees with a diameter 6 inches o�greater measu�ed at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all stnactures and the p�esent uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting - ❑ . � Supplemental infonnation including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ � Existing natural features including rock outcroppi�gs,wetlands and marsh areas � The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used fo� purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ � If any of the foregoing infonnation cannot practicably be shown on the p�eliminary plat, it shall be incorpo�ated into a naRative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan , � � The owner of the subject parcel ❑ � The owne�'s authorized agent ❑ � The map scale, no�th arrow and date ❑ � Proposed p�operty lines ❑ � Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ � Contour lines(2'intervals fo�slopes 0-10°/a or 5'for slopes>10°/a) ❑ � Location,width and names of streets,easements and othe�public ways within and adjacent to the pa�cel ❑ � Location of all pennanent buildings on and within 25`of all p�operty lines ❑ � Location and width of all water courses ❑ � LocaGon of a�y trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ � All slopes greater than 25% ❑ � Locatio� of existing and proposed utilities and utility easeme�ts ❑ � Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ � Evidence fhat land pa�tition will not p�eclude efficient future la�d division whe�e applicable ❑ � Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street co�nections ❑ City of Tiga�d Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan � The p�oposed site a�d surrounding p�opecties � � Contou�line intervals � � The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • ExisGng and piatted streets and othe�public ways � • Easeme�ts on the site and on adjoining properties � • Proposed streets or othe�public ways and easements on the site � • Altemative�outes of dead-end or p�oposed st�eets that requi�e future extensions � � The locations and dimensio�s of the following: • Entrances and exits o� the site _ � • Parfcing and circulation a�eas � • Loading and service a�eas � • Pedestrian and bicyde circ�lation [� • Outdoo�common areas � . • Above g�ound uGlities � • Trash a�d�ecyGable material a�eas � � The loca6ons,dime�sions and setbadc distances of tf�e following: • Existing permanent structures, imp�ovements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site � • P�oposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the sife � • Sanitary sewer facilities � • Existi�g o�proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ � Locatio�s and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ � The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan � Locatio�of trees to be removed ❑ � LocaGon,size and species of existing plant materials ❑ � General IocaGon,size and species of p�oposed plan materials ❑ � Landscape narraGve that addresses: - • Soil condi6ons and how plant selectio�s were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soi!treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • E�osion control measures that will be used ❑ � Location and descriptio� of the irrigation system whe�e applicable ❑ � Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ � Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play a�eas, a�d common open spaces ❑ Public lmprovementslStreets Plan � Proposed right-of-way locations and widd�s ❑ � A scaled cross-sectio� of al1 proposed st�eets plus any�eserve strips , ❑ � Approximate cente�line p�ofiles showi�g the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable dista�ce beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tiga�d Land Use Applicatio�Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan � The loca6ons and extent to which grading will take place � � Existing and p�oposed oontou�lines � � � Slope ratios � Utilities Plan � Approximate plan and profiles of p�oposed sa�itary and stoRn sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans � � Plan of the p�oposed wate�distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan � The location of all areas subject to inundation o�storm water overflow � � Location,width and di�ection of flow of all water courses and drainageways � � Location and estimated size of proposed storm d�ainage lines � � Whe�e applicable, location and estimated size and dime�sions of proposed water quality/detentio�facility � Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan � Identification of the location,size and species of al!existing trees � � P�ogram to save existing trees o�mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) � � A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings � Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ � Elevation drawings for each elevation of the stn.ictu�e ❑ Sign Drawings � Specify p�oposed location, size and height ❑ i:�;curpinlmastersVevised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 � • / • � / ' - � ± L��t • �ar�.s�C.��t'��t July 29, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Regarding: Addition to Calvin Presbyterian Church Eapansion af a Conditional Use Dear Mark: In 1991, Calvin Presbyterian Church adopted a ten-year Master Plan for phased development of their five acre site on Canterbury Lane and S.W. 103`a In 1992, a new main entrance and multipurpose room was added. In 1994, a new 500 seat sanctuary and full site development (including parking lots and landscaping)was completed. In i 996, an extensive interior remodel of the existing "original"portion was completed. This proQosed addition is the last major capitol improvement planned for the church under the 1991 Master Plan. Calvin will be (substantially) at full development with the completion of this project. Calvin Presbyterian Church wishes to obtain the necessary approvals and permits required to build this accessory (classroom and multipurpose) space. Yours truly, I � � ' Russell L. Leach Architect Robert Gray Partners, Inc. RLL/mb P.O. BOX 1000 • SHERWOOD, OREGON 97I40 • (503) 692-4675 • FAX(503) 692-9292 • CCB# 65424 . . ' Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) A� �St,sss S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Thursday, August 05, 1999 s:oo 8:30 . 9:00 meeting w/Russell Leach @692-4675 9:30 10:00 no meetings 10:30 11:00 no meetings 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 11:12AM Friday,July 30, 1999 . .��. A Classroom/Multipurpose Addition to Calvin Presbvterian Churcb Pre-Auplication Meeting Notes (Anplicants Responses) General The proposed addition (16,600 sq. ft.) is attached to the existing church building. It is designed to blend with the existing structure in height, form, color and use of materials. This proposal is the last development phase in accordance with Calvin's 1991 Master Plan. The church will be at"full development". Sec. 18.510Z10—Zoning Dimensional Requirements The proposal meets all requirements. Rear yard— The proposed addition is 45 ft. from the North property line (15 ft. is minimum required). The building wall height matches the existing structure (26.5 ft.). The pitched roof portion is lower than the existing sanctuary roof. Sec. 18.730—Saecial Building Height Provisions Does not apply because the structure is adjacent to a residential zone. Sec. 18.765.040—Parking and Access Required parking for a church use is based upon the number of seats in the main assembly area. The main assembly area was approved (including parking) and constructed in 1994. No increase in size of this area is proposed. Therefore, no additional parking is required. This proposal consisting of classrooms and multipurpose room is accessory to the primary occupancy. The church has 150 parking spaces including (6) ADA accessible spaces which meets the 1994 zoning requirements for this use. The existing sanctuary(main assembly space) seats 500. All parking spaces are standard size. Sec. 18.705.030—Walkwav Requirements Calvin Presbyterian Church has an extensive existing walkway system connecting building entrances with streets and parking lots. . � � � The new addition will require the relocation of 1 building access sidewalk connection to the main parking lot. Buf�'ering and Screening Calvin Presbyterian Church has a common(North property line) which abuts the rear yard of 6 single family residences. Buffering has been addressed and approved in each of the previous CUP applications (1992 and 1994). This proposal will locate a 2 story addition(structure)45 ft. from the North property line. The existing landscape buffer space is 20 ft. wide along the entire (North) boundary. This property line is fenced. This proposal includes new landscaping all around the building perimeter and in the existing pre school playground area. Sec. 18.745, 18.765 and 18.705—Landscaains New and relocated landscaping is limited to areas immediately adjacent to the building addition. The balance of the size is fully landscaped including required street trees and parking lot landscaping. Sec. 18.780—SiEns No new signs are proposed. Sec. 18.790.030—Tree Removal Requirements Two existing cedars of Lebanon trees lie 15-30 ft. West of the proposed addition. These trees will be retained. No other tree removals are proposed. Sec. 18.390.040 Rnd 18.390.050— Imaact Studv A. Transportation 1. Streets The existing Calvin Church is bounded by (2) public streets, SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d. Existing driveways and parking areas are unchanged. The proposed addition of classroom and multipurpose room space is accessory to the existing Primary Assembly Area. Parking and traffic impacts are affected primarily by the size of church membership and the capacity of its main assembly area. Since this proposal does not increase either, new traffic impacts would be negligible. 2. Storm Drainage System The site is fully developed including building roofs, paving and landscaping. The proposed addition has a roof area of area of 8,300 sq. ft. However, the total increase in impervious surface is only 4,100 sq. ft. The site has(2) existing water quality treatment/detention facilities constructed in 1994. The existing system capacity was designed for 10% excess capacity. Therefore, a small increase of impervious surface will not impact the existing system. 3. Sanitary Sewer System Calvin Church has an (on site) storage tank/pump system which collects sewage at a low point on the West side of the existing building complex and pumps to the 8" sanitary sewer in SW Canterbury Lane at the SW property corner. The proposed addition includes (2)new restrooms and several sinks. A new (on site) side sewer will be carried to the existing location of the storage tank/pump. Additional impacts upon the public sanitary sewer system will be negligible. 4. Other impacts—Parks, domestic water, etc. The proposed addition is small and does not necessarily increase occupancy, frequency or intensity of use. Therefore, most potential impacts are negligible or non-existent. Neighborhood Meeting The neighborhood meeting was held at Calvin Presbyterian Church on 8/30/99. See neighborhood meeting sign up sheet and report. The applicant did not have and was not aware that an affidavit of posting and mailing was required. A map of the"mailing" tax lots is enclosed along with a returned and post dated envelope. Calvin Church will certify compliance in any additional form that you require. Sec. 18.753— Recvclins , , . t Existing garbage disposal and recycling provisions are existing. Additional Concerns (Bv Staffl 1. Parking calculations are based upon existing and fully developed parking lots with 150 spaces and an existing sanctuary with a seating capacity of 500. Required parking at the time of CU approval for the sanctuary and parking lot construction was 1 space per 4 seats (1994). Since no change is proposed in the size or seating capacity for the main assembly azea, no new parking should be required. 2. Secondary Uses Parking standards in mixed use projects are subject to a formula which distinguishes primary uses from secondary uses. Mixed use projects are typical in shopping centers containing various retail, motor vehicle, of�ice or industrial uses which have individual and substantially different parking requirements. Although religious institutions have a va.riety of in-house uses including Offices, Classrooms, Library, Multipurpose, Chapel, etc. the off-street parking requirement in table 18.765.2 recognizes that the parking required for full occupancy of the Sanctuary (on Sundays) far exceeds the collective requirement of all other subordinate uses which are occupied generally at other times. The mixed use parking formula Sec. 18.765.030 D 1, 2, 3 and 4 does not apply. ,_.�. � _� � t ��;� Citq of Tigard �'ommunity�UeveCopment SFeupingA BetterCommunity MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Fax 684-7297 TO: Jim Hendryx FROM: Dick Bewersdorff DATE: November 15, 2000 SUBJECT: Calvin Presbyterian Church On July 5, 2000, the City Hearings Officer approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP2000-00002) to allow the Calvin Presbyterian Church to build a 16,670 square foot addition. The addition was for classrooms and a multi-purpose room. The original church was built in 1965. The City approved expansions in 1992 and 1994. Churches are required to provide one space for each two seats in the main assembly area. Since the church was not adding area to the main sanctuary, they were not required to add additional parking. They were, however, required to replace seven spaces lost to the expansion. This was done by restriping 35 standard spaces as 42 compact spaces. Plans submitted shows 161 parking spaces on site. The standard of one space/two seats was developed in 1998 along with all new revised parking standards in the 1998 code update. The standard would require 250 spaces because the church sanctuary seats 500. As a result, the church is non-conforming as to the City's parking standards. (Previous to 1998, the standard for church parking was one space for each three fixed seats or every six feet of bench length in the assembly area or every 50 square feet of floor space in the assembly area, whichever was greater.) c: 2000 Planning correspondence file Julia Hajduk i:\curpin\dick\memoslcalvinpresmemo.doc I : . 1 AFFIDA�IIT OF POSTING NOTICE RE EI�IN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR'DAYS�F THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: > City o['Tiga�rd Planuing llivision i lf�'� `r t�O�� ? 7.3X25�SW Hull Boulevard . . .Tigard,OR 97223 COMMUNITY D -� �� I, 2 a��c T� �! , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a p�oposed �c.r 1� �Y.��l_� affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) �f no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) cuRently registered) <°,�rr�e�r �� ZU3ra �- S�� Sv,P � S�' • , and did on the ,�3'�`c day of ��ersonally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a � ' U�� application, and the time, date and place of a neighbotiiood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at c��ti.�'�C�� +�i �./G�.x-,�..��(. U ' (state location you posted notice on property) Signa ure (In th presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETFINOTARIZE� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ��day of (�`��o�e r a�. OFFlC�AL SEAL MARJORIE BRUEMMER NOTARYPUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY P LIC OF OREGON COMMISSION NO.333843 M Commission Ex ires: o y MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRrSAF��1g 2pp4 y p � �� ' (ApplicanL, 1>lcase coni��lele informaLion k>elow for proper��lacemenL�+�ilh proposed projecL) -------------------------------------------- - � --- i NAh1l?ot� t��tO.I��;C'i'c�t: ►�IC01�OS�;U �'�nil�;:__ Calvin Presbyterian Church Parking Lot � �'I'YP1�: OI' l'It01'OS1�;1) UI;VI;I.Of'AtI:N'l': — — -- _ _ I �Nauir of A�iplicanUOwncr: RuS S 211 L. Leach � I Address or General l.ocalion of Sul�jecl Pro�>erly: SW 10 3 rd. Ave. & SW I nez S t. � �s��l,�� 1��-�,,,��y'1'.��; nt�,�(ti)�„d I,��i��5>:_2S1 Wi1BC ---Lot_00900 ------ ' �----------------------- ——— _—h U��n�i.�tly�nastrrs�ift{�osl mst . File Edit Options Wndow Help _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ __ } _ � -- 00. �k ( � ..... � �" ......I T�° � � I _._ .. _ _.._.__. �t. S� EEE � [t"i] � � .._"'0✓ .....� � .� � "t3' �,. � Clacc Edit Project Group f�dd �. Clonc Parccl Activity Pcoplc Fcec ylaluation Conditior Cacc Natc� — � i � - - - I I I I I I I . - - � ❑ .� t�Jame: CALVIN PRESBYTARIAN, RAY BEYER Updated: Od-07-00 JPH �=cn�r�i Address: 104d5 SV1F �4NTERBURY �N Jur: TI� Description: hrlaster# CUP2000-00002 Project: CALVIM PRES. CHURCH E}(P� Comments Conditional use approval to construct a t�+�;o-story, 16,670 square foat additian anto the X C::�P��ir� F're•=:b�q�tarian Churr_f-�. Lat Size: �— sf Building SiZe: 16,670 sf Dates � Proposed Use: � R e c e ive d: 7�4r177I�000 Resolution Numher: r Target: Zoning: �— �� Issued: Expired: � Finaled: � ' CALV'IN PRESBYTE�CIAN�BUP92-00143 ; BUP F 10445 SUV CANTERBURY LN Cc .. _ _---- _._.__ ,___ __.. . _------.— ___._- .-- CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN BUP94-00257 � BUP F 10445 51N CANTERBURY LN Cs CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN BUP94-00313 ; BUP F 104�5 SN CANTERBURY LN Ca �.�: + ► r�� -- --.___. _...___ _______----- -... �___�____._--______ ._ _.M Printing Case Summary Report for CUP2000-00002 ;�Start ` ; � '� �I � " � �GroupWise-Mailbox ' ,r�pERMIT�PLAN '�Microsoft Word-DIA...� l�N� Copyright B 1997-1999 Tidemark Computer Systems Inc. 10/30/2000 All Rights Reserved. ��, City of Tigard � Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOH 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 {503)639-4171 Fax 684-7297 TO: Jim Hendryx FROM: Dick Bewersdorff DATE: November 15, 2000 SUBJECT: Calvin Presbyterian Church On July 5, 2000, The City Hearings Officer approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP2000- 00002) to allow the Calvin Presbyterian Church to build a 16,670 square foot addition. The addition was for classrooms and a multi-purpose room. The original church was built in 1965. The City approved expansions in 1992 and 1994. Churches are required to provide one space for each two seats in the main assembly area. Since the church was not adding area to the main sanctuary, they were not required to add additional parking. They were, however, required to replace seven spaces lost to the expansion. This was done by restriping 35 standard spaces as 42 compact spaces. Plans submitted shows 161 parking spaces on site. The standard of one space/two seats was developed in 1998 along with all new revised parking standards in the 1998 code update. The standard would require 250 spaces because the church sanctuary seats 500. As a result, the church is non-conforming as to the City's parking standards. (Previous to 1998, the standard for church parking was one space for each three fixed seats or every six feet of bench length in the assembly area or every 50 square feet of floor space in the assembly area, whichever was greater.) c: File Julia Hajduk i:curpin\dick 10/16/2000 Conditions Associated with Case #: CUP2000-00002 2:13:32 PM Cond. Stat. Changed B Code Title Hold Status Changed y Tag Updai 0001 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 0 Met 06/14/2000 JPH 10/12/: 1. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the existing and proposed parking spaces on the site. The proposed parking shall include at least� spaces so that there is no net loss in parking spaces as a result of the addition. 0001 LOCATION BICYCLE RACK 0 Met 10/16/2000 JPH 10/16/: 2. Submit a revised plan that shows the revised location of the bicycle rack. The Iocation must be in compliance with Section 18.765.050. 0001 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Met 10/16/2000 JPH 10/16/: 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the shrubs previously provided for in the 1994 expansion or an acceptable alternate will 6e in: the northern property line. This landscaping must be installed prior to final inspection of the building permits. 0001 RESTRIPED PARKING AREA 0 Not Met JPH 07/07/: 4. Prior to final inspection,the parking area shall be re-striped to provide the approved compact parking spaces. In addition,the remainder o area shall be re-striped to provide more visible pavement markings. 0001 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 0 Not Met JPH 07/07/: 5. All site improvements must be made in accordance with the approved plans. Page 1 of 1 _ . .. ' . �� CONDITIONAL USE � o p TYPE III APPLICATI4N � CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Ha!!Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: J`\ GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): FOR STAFF USE ONLY 10445 SW Canterbury Lane ( ) /�`��vv' � Tax Map 8�Tax Lot#(s): Case No. s : L Other Case No.(s): Map: 2S1 11BC Lot # 2800 ReceiptNo.: Site Size: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)": Calvin Presbyterian Churc Date: Address: 10445 SW Canterbury L�hone: 639-3273 City: Tigard, OR ZiP; 97224 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant`: Calvin Presbvterian, Rav Bever Address: 10 4 4 5 SW Can t e rburv Phone: 6 3 9-3 2 7 3 Comp PIan/Zone Designation: City: Tiqard, OR Zip:97224 * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT A�ea:� applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 1:lcurpinMasterslcua.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner{s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Ths ov.�ners of recc�d af the s�bject property request Cor.clitio^a! � Application Form Use approval to allow(please be specific): ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization See a t tached proposal summary ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed � ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check Iist) �,; (� `�J�i_�� ❑ SitelPlot Plan (reduced 8'/i'x 11") vti. -a �P��-'°.� ��" ��s - ��/� '�y"�1�� ❑ ApplicanYs Statement r,. •„e. ') � ��.,v��9 nc�9 / (#of copies based on pre-app check list� - 7 � � ��s ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributedlcompleted at application submittal) �'�,� �-�� i z -�-'�`�`�l ;//S� ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped �� . �-�� °� �'��°'^5�`'� Legal Size Envelopes _ F;! ,._ (� o � ' � �� ❑ Filing Fee $1,615.00 � PY .. . . . � List any VARIANCE, SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as pa�t of this application: None APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as des�r�ae�on:h�frort of:h�s app:i�ation in the"Requ�rzd Suk�mittal Elerriarits" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: � • Lhe above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imnosed upon the subject �g� • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits t�ansmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this �� day of , 192� Presbytery of Portland lvin Presbyterian Church � , � , �Si Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Robert Burk, President Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 r , Calvin Presbvterian Church Application for Conditional Use Proposal Summarv Request Conditional Use approval for a two-story, 16,670 sq. ft. addition to Calvin Presbyterian Church. This addition is the last of(3) building additions proposed and presented to the Hearing Examiner (initially in 1991). The proposed addition includes Classrooms, a Multipurpose room, and accessory spaces. No additional space of seating is proposed for the existing "Main" Assembly Space (Sanctuary) and no new paving or parking is proposed. ., 1 Narrative The pre-application conference notes (pages 1 through 9) are previously addressed in order following: 18.510 Zoning Dimensional Requirements 18.730 Special Building Height Provisions 18.705/18.765 Parking Areas and Walkway Requirements 18.795 Clear Vision Area 18.745 Buffering and Screening 18.745/18.765/18.705 Landscaping 18.780 Sign Permits 18.790 Tree Removal and Mitigation 18.390 Impact Study The following code chapters were checked for discussion in the pre-app. notes (page 7 of 9) and are not previously discussed. 18.330—Conditional Use This proposal is a major modification of an existing conditional use. Although this proposal is not part of an approved, phased development, it has been presented to the community and the hearing examiner as a part of the 1991 Calvin Master Plan in previous 1992 and 1994 development phases. 18.330.030—Apnroval Standards 1. The site size and dimensions are adequate for this proposed addition. 2. The impacts of the proposed addition are minimal. , 3. All public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the addition. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met. 5. This proposaUaddition is in compliance with Sec. 18.330.050 —Additional Development Standards. For religious institutions all existing setbacks substantially exceed minimum requirements and the proposed addition at 45 ft. from the rear property line exceeds the minimum setback of 20 ft. 18.360—Site Develoament Review This proposal is a major modification (addition) to an existing development. The proposal would add 16,600 sq. ft. of building area—More than 10% (18.360.080-B- 8). No other evaluation criteria (Bl through 11) applies. 18.360.080— Exceptions to Standards No exceptions to standards as outlined in A, B, C or D apply. Although the parking standard for the main assembly space in a religious institution has changed,this portion of the institution is not proposed for modification and therefore the existing parking ratio is unchanged. 18.510—Residential Zoning Districts The underlying and sunounding zoning district is R 3.5. A Conditional Use permit is required for a major modification per table 18.510. 18.755—Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclable Storage Calvin Presbyterian Church has an existing mixed solid waste and recyclable storage area at the Northwest corner of the on-site paved areas. Calvin's franchised hauler has provided containers in a location that meets the providers collection requirements. The proposed building addition will not require additional solid waste or recycle facility. 18 800—Street and Utilitv Improvement Standards The proposed addition does not affect or require any street or public utility , improvements. A Classroom/Multipurpose Addition to Calvin Presbvterian Church Pre-Anplication Meeting Notes (Applicants Responses) General The proposed addition (16,600 sq. ft.) is attached to the existing church building. It is designed to blend with the existing structure in height, form, color and use of materials. This proposal is the last development phase in accordance with Calvin's 1991 Master Plan. The church will be at "full development". Sec. 18.510.210—Zoning Dimensional Requirements The proposal meets all requirements. Rear yard—The proposed addition is 45 ft. from the North property line(15 ft. is minimum required). The building wall height matches the existing structure (26.5 ft.). The pitched roof portion is lower than the existing sanctuary roof. Sec. 18.730—Special Building Height Provisions Does not apply because the structure is adjacent to a residential zone. Sec. 18.765.040—Parking and Access Required parking for a church use is based upon the number of seats in the main � assembly azea. The main assembly area was approved (including parking) and constructed in 1994. No increase in size of this area is proposed. Therefore, no additional parking is required. This proposal consisting of classrooms and multipurpose room is accessory to the primary occupancy. The church has 150 parking spaces including (6) ADA accessible spaces which meets the 1994 zoning requirements for this use. The existing sanctuary (main assembly space) �� seats 500. All parking spaces are standard size. Sec. 18.705.030—Walkwav Requirements Calvin Presbyterian Church has an extensive existing walkway system connecting building entrances with streets and parking lots. , The new addition will require the relocation of 1 building access sidewalk connection to the main parking lot. Buf�'ering and Screening Calvin Presbyterian Church has a common (North property line) which abuts the rear yard of 6 single family residences. Buffering has been addressed and approved in each of the previous CUP applications (1992 and 1994). This proposal will locate a 2 story addition(structure)45 ft. from the North property line. The existing landscape buffer space is 20 ft. wide along the entire (North)boundary. This property line is fenced. This proposal includes new landscaping all around the building perimeter and in the existing pre school playground area. Sec. 18.745, 18.765 and 18.705—Landscaping New and relocated landscaping is limited to areas immediately adjacent to the building addition. The balance of the size is fully landscaped including required street trees and parking lot landscaping. Sec. 18.780—Si�ns No new signs are proposed. Sec. 18.790.030—Tree Removal Reauirements Two existing cedars of Lebanon trees lie 15-30 ft. West of the proposed addition. These trees will be retained. No other tree removals are proposed. Sec. 18.390.040 and 18.390.050— Impact Studv A. Transportation .� 1. Streets The existing Calvin Church is bounded by (2) public streets, SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d. Existing driveways and parking areas are unchanged. The proposed addition of classroom and multipurpose room space is accessory to the existing Primary Assembly Area. Parking and traffic impacts are af�'ected primarily by the size of church membership and the capacity of its main assembly area. Since this proposal does not increase either, new traffic impacts would be negligible. 2. Storm Drainage System The site is fully developed including building roofs, paving and landscaping. The proposed addition has a roof area of area of 8,300 sq. ft. However, the total increase in impervious surface is only 4,100 sq. ft. The site has (2) existing water quality treatment/detention facilities constructed in 1994. The existing system capacity was designed for 10% excess capacity. Therefore, a small increase of impervious surface will not impact the existing system. 3. Sanitary Sewer System Calvin Church has an (on site) storage tank/pump system which collects sewage at a low point on the West side of the existing building complex and pumps to the 8" sanitary sewer in SW Canterbury Lane at the SW property corner. The proposed addition includes (2) new restrooms and several sinks. A new (on site) side sewer will be canied to the existing location of the storage tank/pump. Additional impacts upon the public sanitary sewer system will be negligible. 4. Other impacts—Parks, domestic water, etc. The proposed addition is small and does not necessarily increase occupancy, frequency or intensity of use. Therefore, most potential impacts are negligible or non-existent. Neighborhood Meeting The neighborhood meeting was held at Calvin Presbyterian Church on 8/30/99. See neighborhood meeting sign up sheet and report. The applicant did not have and was � not aware that an affidavit of posting and mailing was required. A map of the "mailing" tax lots is enclosed along with a returned and post dated envelope. Calvin Church will certify compliance in any additional form that you require. Sec. 18.753— Recvcling . � � Existing garbage disposal and recycling provisions are existing. ' Additional Concerns (Bv Staftl 1. Parking calculations are based upon existing and fully developed parking lots with 150 spaces and an existing sanctuary with a seating capacity of 500. Required parking at the time of CU approval for the sanctuary and parking lot construction was 1 space per 4 seats (1994}. Since no change is proposed in the size or seating capacity for the main assembly area, no new parking should be required. 2. Secondary Uses Parking standards in mixed use projects are subject to a formula which distinguishes primary uses from secondary uses. Mixed use projects are typical in shopping centers containing various retail, motor vehicle, o�ce or industrial uses which have individual and substantially different parking requirements. Although religious institutions have a variety of in-house uses including Offices, Classrooms, Library, Multipurpose, Chapel, etc. the off-street parking requirement in table 18.765.2 recognizes that the parking required for full occupancy of the Sanctuary (on Sundays) far exceeds the collective requirement of all other subordinate uses which are occupied generally at other times. The mixed use parking formula �ec. 18.765.030 D l, 2, 3 and 4 does not apply. �� 7/ V �' �.,�!0 .�r mrsn� _ _ .�' ?rn""�� °z °�� ' �NoiLiaNc� �NIL91X% • N '�c'td �J-i-� :_ 4 " F11�OfJ =�n-v-� }.�nc�-vmlrvv-� n� S . � .i_ ... _.__. ------ --- -- - � - .... _—____. '_ "_.._-_'_'-___'. .. _""___- "'—____"____-"____—_- " ._ _ — � 1 . . 'I'.VM1b11KJd ._ . .. .. ._}yyM1\Q�r(.IQ _ , 9nc5'r�q �y� -_--_-_. _. ___ _-_ ' � - . '�~•\. _�_.-- — _ _' �� __' _ _ _ i - . � . — _ '___,. _____ — _ �--� _. _...._."_— , _ ' � -�-- ��— ---� � � /1 �(� '� � � i --- ' � 3 i� � ; ' � � o � � . - �r��,� C� I � � QA (N ' ' �1,! ❑ ^'��..9r1 ^� li A � / \ , ' � 6� .,, �,:��7 � r� a u� 6 .---,"y i i . � - �,< r��o..ao 1v � -,�� _ � ;� i �� p m ��v�..— _ ti - ` � � Q .,�,��,� .� c- —�-� C� — _ � � �° - �� F � � f , — �'i ' �� °, o n 'V� i -_ � ,.::1 � � � � s �� _ ;,� 4 � � � �i � c -, ia6� p �, '• -` V N � � I '� } � � NQ S g i � N' o«rm.u.aw-C � ' .. � . ��l A � ; I`MaZ� owl' j ...._....__.� ..._ �..:��.-�.,,� ...._ � `�_f.- - , , 00'�0 1 A `G � � � 9n�0'nn0 WtLnVJ. ._ � f! "_� I �_� � c��. � � p � ! � � �.,n-�.7 �7rn_6 ra �, �, _ � �^` ' .�'-��- '.�-»� j �i � � I �� _ � r \ \ � i � i _ .�� .. �y � � � �,AA�� _= ,�',:� �'�'� � �� - � - - � � i µ -1 - -- � ; � ; _,-- T ! _ 1,,."�„ � ``1 ,�� lA�.,,� � � �Ml»9�*'•�11- -��..�� -- -^+�'�c+ws ��.�!I �� £ ' � A+a �+�,sR-e-- — )� s�►i' ,L�r,d., '� rawaoer*n �� 3 �t+Yi -p:ideXj I c . I I I 1�TY�! Or+d I / . i ' •� � . i , �?3WG�R.r�JR�� ` I *- J Ni j po I '� I �M � � l-a--�� ' ° � � � # xwr�.+n i I - ^ J i i�. ' Ir+--- r I I i i; I� � �2 j p ��aas .Ll \v� m:in9'ccr�- aACr,��n��d.oaun� I i'" 't� rvo_�oad i � I (-qnT o� � 7c�+=4� ' . � � dm Noi�� '+��'.�YJ '�'7ti �e �� ,� �� r� i�� Jh��fyJ� I I ' � - � �' -- I '�. �n��-. . `-� i �u.c"ra� ,, '�p �v F.v-� r 1 �. � arw-++.r�.a�*�k-e 1 � , i. � i � �, aar�-uw.er.i I � - � � i ao . 7�-,1�r� � , L� r L � .,, I • ... - __ __. � � , � Q�Q J �Y I J «, � 'a� -.-..-� . �. . .._ / � —/ ' . � -- .�_ � (,�+,{. 0r,�rrzs 'ro�v -.+� sr.rd o�'+a � i.�.� �� .. Ll._ __.. �, � w�+�an� �� vev�+.e a�vcs� o+-,�i t'�a ae-ya�s,�ra I ..___—___'_.._ I �LL4�1fM +MIiN 1 aJ 'X`��:S+l'a 7� JGO�+'r' �X.UFJ,f� � i1(i�� arvv'!?Lb) 7�Y�2(��L� 9�+LLq+Y; • lF� �n�� --_ � _ "__._ _ . �'1`il'Al�Q rn'='��✓�j '� . I 1/� IihM�� . . �—��1—�� !c"—a � �� r�� / ,..,�,,,� �� I •_.�� , � � ----��-----�-- ooF�---� ��A �w"ll j .� oo�E �� f -- —��z- �l � I � �,„�� " ~"- • , C �`r� ��`Y � ai� � � �, � C �aks�� N -r � , P �-� `�p � � � J \ � . � j i �n t�i� � � �a}� �� r a �. �-� �� ro'�-��:N �