CUP2007-00002 �20 D1yYS =2/19/2008 (Includes - ' day extension)
DATE OF FILING: 12/18/20G .�
DATE MAILED: 12/19/2007 =
CITY OF TIGARD
Washington County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CLJI' 2007-00002
Case Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
Applicant's Name/Address: Broadwa Rose Theatre Co. PO Box 231004 Ti ard OR 97281
Owner's Name/Address: Ti ard-Tualatin School District 23 6960 SW Sand Street Ti ard OR 97223
Address of Property: 12850 SW Grant Avenue Ti ard Ore on 97224
Tax Ma /Loc Nos.: Wa. Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S102C�,Tax Lot 100 &2S102BC,Tax Lot 8700.
A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATTNG THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND GONQ,USIONS APPROVING A RE�UEST FOR
A CONDITIONAL LTSE. THE QTY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFIC�R HAS REVIEWED TT�E APPLICANT'S PLANS,
NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COM1vIENTS OF REVIEWING AGENQES, 'IT� PLANIVING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT
AND REGOA�IlvIENDATIONS FOR'THE APPLICATTON DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT.
T'I-� HEARINGS OFFIC�R HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 10, 2007 TO REC�IVE TESTTMONY
REGARDING 'T'�IIS APPLICATTON. T�IIS DEQSION HAS BEEN BASED ON TT� FACTS, FINDINGS AND
CONQ.USIONS CONTAINED WITHIN T�IIS FINAL ORDER
Request: ➢ The applicant requested approval of a Conditional Use Pernzit to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium and
construct a 2,600 square foot addition to the e�cistin� C.F. Tigard Elementary School. The applicant will use the
renovated area as a theater space and adinuustrative o fices. The a�plicant is also expanding the existin parking and
access drive and providing additional landscaping. The site contauls about 8.9 acres. At the Decem�er 10, 2007
public hearing, the Hearings Officer held the record open for one week. On December 13, 2007, the parties
mached an agreement; therefore, the Hearings Officer closed the record on December 13, 2007 and approved
this request, subject to the conditions of approval contained within this final order. Staff recommended
Condition of approval#24 was modified to reflect the parties' agreement and#25 was deleted.
Zone: R 12: Medium-Density Residential Distnct. A��licable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters
18.330, 18360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested O Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
❑X Owners of Record within the Required Distance ❑X Affected Govemment Agencies
❑x Interested Parties � The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Plaruiing Division/Community Development
Department at the City of Tigard Pernut Center at City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 19, 2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON ANUARY 5, 2008 LTNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
peal:
e decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with
standing as provided in Section 18390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18390.040.G.2.
of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the re quired fee
shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard Ciry Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON ANUARY 4, 2008.
Questions: If yc�u have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Regarding an application by Broadway Rose Theater Co. for )F I N A L O R D E R
a conditional use pernut for a theater space and admuustrative )
offices in the existing C.F. Tigard ElementarySchool at ) CLTI'2007-00002
12850 SW Grant Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon )(Broadway Rose Theater)
A. SLTMMARY
1. Francesca Gambetti filed the application for BroadwayRose Theater Company
(the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use pernzit to renovate a
cafeteria/auditorium and construct a 2,600 square foot addition to the existing C.F. Tigard
ElementarySchool at 12850 SW Grant Avenue; also known as tax lot 100 WCIIVI2S102C�
and t�lot 8700 WCITVI 2S102BC(the "site"). The applicant will use the renovated area as a
theater space and admulistrative offices. The applicant also proposed to expand the e�sting
parking and access drive and to provide additional landscaping. The site contains about 8.9
acres and is zoned R 12. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and
applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated
November 30, 2007 (the " Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference.
2. Tigard Hearings Of f icer Joe Turner(the "hearings of f icer") conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public
hearing, Cirystaff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of
the applicant testified in support of the application. Other than service providers, no one
testified orallyor in writing. Disputed issue in this case include:
a. Whether the applicant is required to provide a buffer along the entire
nonh boundary of the site;
b. Whether the applicant is required to install fencing around on-site trees
located away f rom the c�nstruction area; and
c. Whether, and to what extent,the applicant is required dedicate right of way
along the site's School Street frontage.
3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof
for a conditional use pemut based on the findings and conclusions included and
incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order.
S. HEARING AND RECORD
1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on December 10,2007 to
receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list,
materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the
hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beguuung of the hearing,the hearings
officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclauned any
ee pa�te contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a stuiunary by the hearings
officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing.
2. Ciry planner Cheryl Caines suiYUnarized the Staff Report and corrected
typographical errors.
a. She requested the hearings officer delete conditions 3.E, and 7. She noted
that the applicant included a bicycle parking detail he plans submitted with the application.
Therefore she requested the hearings officer delete the finding and condition regarding this
issue at page 20 of the Staff Report. She requested the hearings officer modifycondition 24
to require that the applicant increase the right of way of School Street to 17 feet from the
centerline, rather than 10 feet as listed in the Staff Repon. She testified that the access
standards are met. Theref ore she requested the hearings of f icer delete the f inding and
condition regarding access at page 14 of the Staff Report.
b. She noted that the landscape buffer requirements of the Code are based
on the proposed uses of the site and abutting properties. In this case the proposed theater is
a commercial use abutting existing residential uses to the north. Therefore a landscape buffer
is required along the entire north boundary,even where no parkuig is proposed. The existing
parking lot on the north of the site limits the applicant's abilityto provide a landscape buffer.
The applicant proposed to install slats in the existing cyClone fence in order to enhance the
e�sting buffer to the inaxunum extent feasible without modifying the existing parking lot.
The applicant will install slatted fencing and additional trees and shrubs in the remainder of
the buffer along the north boundary of the site.
c. She opined that the proposed theater will not generate noise that is
detectable offsite. The applicant hired an acoustical engineer to assist in the design of the
theater and limit noise impacts on the theater. The noise mitigation will also prevent theater
noise from impacting adjacent properties. The applicant did not propose to conduct any
outdoor activities on the site. However patrons congregating in the parking lot and outside
the lobbybefore and after performances maygenerate some noise. Therefore the conditions
of approval require that the applicant provide surrounding residents with a phone number to
contact the theater and report any noise problems that arise. This will allow the applicant to
take steps to limit any actual noise impacts that occur.
d. She agreed with the applicant's request to defer submission of lighting and
rooftop equipment screening plans to prior to issuance of inechanical and electrical permits,
rather than prior to issuance of building pernuts.
e. She argued that tree protection is warranted for all of the trees on the site.
Although some of the trees are located away from the proposed construction,they could be
impacted by construction vehicle parking and maneuvering, equipment and material storage
and other construction activities.
3. Planner Francesca Gambetti,architect Tim Ayersman and artistic director Sharon
Maroney testif ied f or the applicant.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 2
a. Ms. Gambetti accepted the findings and conditions in the Staff Report
with certain exceptions.
i. She requested the hearings officer modifyconditions of approval 1
and 5 to allow the applicant to submit a lighting plan and rooftop equipment screening plan
as pan of the mechanical and electrical pernuts, rather than prior to issuance of building
permits.
u. She argued that tree protection is not warranted for all of the trees
on the site. The site is very large. Many of the trees are located away f rom the proposed
development and will not be impacted by construction activities.
iu. She argued that a 54-foot right of way is not warranted on School
Street. Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC") Table 18.810.1 requires a 54-foot right of wayfor
local streets carrying up to 1500 vehicles per day. School Street is a shon dead-end street that
will carry less than 200 vehicles per day. Therefore a 46-foot right of way is warranted per
TMC Table 18.810.1. She requested the hearings officer modifycondition 24 to allow the
applicant to dedicate seven feet of additional right of wayand create a restrictive covenant
for the remaining six feet of right of way and for the cul-de-sac turnaround.
iv. She requested the hearings officer hold the record open for one
week to allow the applicant,the property owner(the Tigard-Tualatin School District) and
Citystaff to discuss options for the dedication of right of way on School Street abutting the
site.
b. Mr. Ayersman argued that a landscape buffer is not warranted along the
entire north boundary of the site. Parking is only proposed along a portion of the north
boundary of the site.
4. City engineer Kun McMillan argued that the applicant should be required to
dedicate a minunum seven f eet of right of way on School Street. The applicant may establish
a covenant for the remaining ten feet of right of way and the cul-de-sac turnaround. The City
cannot approve a smaller street without evidence from an engineer that the street complies
with the standards for"skinnystreets" in TMC Figure 18.810.5.B. The 46-foot right of way
proposed by the applicant would prohibit parking on School Street,which would have a
significant impact on residents of the adjacent apanment development.
7. At the end of the hearing the hearings officer held the record open for one week
to allow the applicant,the pr�perty owner and City staff to discuss options for the
dedication of right of way on School Street abutting the site.
a. During the open record period the parties reached an agreement as
reflected in the December 13, 20071etter from Kelly Hossaini,the attorney for the Tigard-
Tualatin School District. Therefore the hearings officer closed the record upon receipt of
this letter.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings OJficer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 3
C. DISCUSSION
1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and
applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards
identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the
facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the
proposed use does or can complywith the applicable approval criteria for a CLTP, and
adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are
submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will
prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the
requirements of the TMC. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the
Staf f Report, as modif ied, as his own.
2. The Cit�s buffer matrix,TMC Table 18J45.1, requires screening and buffering
based on the use proposed on the site and the existing uses on abutting properties. In this
case the applicant proposed to develop a theater, a commercial use, adjacent to existing
residential uses. Therefore TMC Table 18.745.1 requires a Type D buffer along the entire
north boundary of the site, including those areas that are not developed as a parking lot. As
noted in the Staff Report,the existing parking lot precludes the uistallation of a full
landscape buffer along a portion of the north boundary. The hearings officer finds that the
proposed buffer is adequate in this section until the School District proposes additional
modifications to the existing parking lot.
3. The hearings of f icer f inds that tree protection is warranted f or all of the trees on
the site. As Ms. Caines noted at the hearing,construction vehicle parking and maneuvering,
equipment and material storage and other construction activities could impact unprotected
trees on the site. The applicant may be able to provide the required tree protection by
f encing of f portions of the site rather than installing f encing around individual trees.
However the final tree protection plan should be subject to City approval.
4. The applicant agreed to dedicate sufficient additional right of wayalong the site's
School Street frontage to provide a 25-foot half-width right of way, elunuiating the need for
a restrictive covenant. Condition of approva124 should be modified to that effect and
condition 25 should be deleted.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order,the
hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use pernzit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Communiry Development Code,provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Offtcer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 4
E. DECISION
In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating
the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter,the hearings
officer herebyapproves C[JI'2007-00002 (BroadwayRose Theater),subject to the following
conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BLJILDING PERMITS:
Su mit to e amm�g epartment ery Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437 or review
and approval:
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
review and approval showing the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for
review and approval that shows the followuig pnor to site perniit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer runrun�g along the northern property, except where the
existuig parking area prohibits installation.
D. Location of and screeiung for the proposed gas meter.
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise
waste hauler uidicatu-ig that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their
requirements.
4. Prior to issuance of site pernuts,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan
showing four accessible parking spaces as requu-ed bythe 2004 Oregon Structural
Specialry Code.
5. Prior to commencin site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Planning and�ngineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees
and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles,machinery, grading, dumping,
storage, burial of debris,or any other construction-related activities ul any
tree protection zone; and
G A note statuzg that onlythose trees identified on the approved Tree Removal
plan are authorized f or removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other
�rovision of this title, any party f ound to 6e in violation of this chapter
18.790]pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Ti�ard Municipal Code shall be
subject to a civ�l penalty of up to $500 and shall be re quu-ed to remedy any
dama ge caused by the violation. Such remediation shaIl include, but not be
limited to,the followin : 1) Replacement of unlawfull}�removed or damaged
trees in accordance wit�Section 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development
Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representuig the
estunated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as deternzined
using the most current International Soaetyof Arboriculture's Guide for
Plant Appraisal.
CUP1007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page S
6. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by
the project arbonst to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an
inspection and allow access by the Ciry Arborist f or the purpose of monitoring the
tree protecuon to verifythat the tree protecuon measures are perfonning adequately.
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project
Arbonst has submitted wntten reports to the Caty Arbonst,at least once every two
weeks, as the Pro'ect Arborist morutors the construction activities from initial tree
pr_otection zone (�Z) fencing installation through the building construction phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fenculg,
determine �f any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection
Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the CityArborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not
being followed bythe contractor or a sub-contractor,the Cirycan sto�p work on the
pro�ect until an uispection can be done by the City Arbonst and the Ijroject Arborist.
I'rior to issuance o} any Certificates of Occupan�cy,the Project Arborist will submit a
f inal certif ication indicating the elements of the Tree Protecuon Plan were f ollowed
and that all remauung trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modif ied
growing environment.
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone,the project arborist
shall�repare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and
the ely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Arborist bef ore proposed work can proceed within a tree protecuon zone. The
City Arborist may requu-e change�s prior to approval. The pro�ect arborist shall be on
site wh�le work is occurring v�nthin the tree protection zone and subrrut a sununary
report certifyin�that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly
unpact the healih and/or stability of the trees.
9. Prior to issuance of building pernuts,the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were preserved,the location of tree�protection fencing.
B. Subrrut a statement and�sig nature of-approval from a certifieci arborist
regarding building and infrastructure siting techniques to be employed in
construction with respect to anyprotected trees on srte.
10. Prior to issuance of site perniits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
Submit to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
1 l. Prior to issuance of a site pernut,a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is
required for this project to cover street im�provements and any other work in the
public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be
subrrutted for review to the Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are in
addition to anydrawings required bythe Bu�lding Division and should onl include
s ei�elevant to public unprovements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI�pernut
plans shall conform to Cary of Ti ard Public Improvement Design Standards, which
are ava�lable at CityHall and the�t}�s web page �www.tigard-orgov).
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Ojfieer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 6
� .
12. The PFI pernzit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and
telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the
"Pernuttee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the p�ub�lic
improvements. For example,specify if the entiry�s a corp oration,lirnited
partnership, LLC,etc. Also spec�fy the state within which the entity is incorporated
and provide the name of the corporate contact�person.Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Depanment wiIl delayprocessing of project
documents.
13. Final design plans and calculations for the pro osed private water quality faciliry shall
be submitted to the Engineeru7g Department �Kim McMillan) as a part of the Public
Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with the plans shall be a
proposed landscape plan and mau�tenance plan.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as pan of the Public Facility Improvement
(PFI) pernut drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and
Sediment Control Design and Plannulg Manual,February 2003 edition."
15. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Pernut issued by the City of Tigard
pursuant to ORS 468.740 an t e Fe era ean Water Act.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SI-IALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS:
Su mit to e anning partment C ery ines, 639-4171, ext. 2437 or review
and approval:
16. Prior to building pernlit issuance the app licant shall submit plans that indicate the
location of all rooftop eqiupment and the gas meter.
17. Prior to the issuance of building perniits,the app licant shall submit for review and
approval a revised site plan showulg the areas �1ltunuiated bythe proposed and
existing hghtuig.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
u mit to t e P amm�g Department ery ines, 639-4171,ext. 2437 or review
and approval:
18. Prior to placement of any signs on site,the ap licant shall apply f or a si n pernut and
supp1y staff with the appropnate plans to ve�y compl�ance with TDC�apter
18.780.
19. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the
effect that any existing tree greater than 6 inches diameter may_be removed only if
the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction
may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with
this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
20. Prior to final building inspection,the app licant shall contact the Staff Planner, Cheryl
Caines, 639-4171, ext. 2437 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be
complete per approved plans.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 7
J .
Submit to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
21. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the water
quality/detention facility and any work in the public right-of-way(or public
easement) and obtain approval trom the Enguieenng Department.
22. Prior to a final building inspection,the one-way traffic flow markings shall be
installed at the driveways as shown on Sheets A1.02 and C2.1.
23. Additional right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the Public along the fronta e of SW
School Street to increase the nght-of-wayto 25 feet from the centerline.�e
description shall be tied to the e�sting nght-of-way centerline. The dedication
document shall be on Cityforn�s. Instructions are ava�lable from the Engineering
Department.
24. To ensure compliance with C1ean Water Services design and construction standards,
the a�plicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
spec icauons of the private water quahty facilityto perform construcuon and visual
observation of the water quality f acility for compliance with the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Prior to final building ins ection,the design
enguzeer shall provide the City of Tigard Engineering staf�with written confirn�ation
that the water qual�tyfacilityis in compliance with the design and specifications.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S
DECISION SHAI_L RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
DATED this 18th day of December 2007.
Joe Turner,Esq., AIQ'
Cityof Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Offtcer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 8
�- ------..
:� , "� wq. � �— � — --;�\ / , —._T\-- - --��-- !, ---- . _ - � ---,-
, � �c ,
�L_!�i ��dI�•T., lI ;' \/ ; Y � / % �!l�, ��� �:' �� . .
I� , , � �� i � � / � ' ,
� i` ;� �, ,a4�Hic N _aMAnoti 5,�s�EM
�( � r--� �% ; � ��° �,__����� /� r '� VICINITY MAP
; ; i � �_ � �'°�.-, e � �
� �� �' ; � \�� , I
' � �� i
—T--�' G� I =___________
� ' ' i �� / .�°��` \ i CLJP2007-00002
� � � � � ,�.z.F =___________ '
I � I ; PP �T� ,� BROADWAY ROSE
I �ti THEATRE
i � � I �� ��� ,I CAFETERIA �
r P ' RENOVATION
1 ` ;i ���
i� � ��, � / �
�' ,��- � ST �� �
� y,P .\ �, �
� ,
\ ,, ti �
� LEGEND: �
�- �.Q' j
� susJECr �
wATK�NS PC SITE �
� I
�\ � ���,GT -i i
�
�
� � y �• � ,1 �. �
� �.\ pQ ���Y) ��W✓.. �,� I
\ r� �
\ ' j � I
Gf� NT \ �=`=- �< < �"1� " 1
DELL CT � � . � � �
— � � - .• _ �
� �Ta;7 HL`. .4` ` I I
. I ��' a��!eL'Y.IT.� . I
Z ��ycNO 53�. � i W:L'�.� �F;il '. 'I I I
� i
� � � �T �� �
�L �I I Tiga�a Area Mau I i
/� - — - -----' '
N �
PARK ST ! '
PARK ST i o so �so z�o seo aso Fee[ �
�
1"=366 feet �
I
w I
�
Q
"..�.v-��.,���..., ';
COOK LN �`�'
_ �� _
QP � Inlwmation on th�s ma0�s for general location only and i
� slwuld be verilied with ihe Develppment Services Division. I �
„ (� 13125 SW Hall 81vd !
Z Tigard,OR 97223 '
Y �� (503)639-0171 �
I ~ \\ � '_ /� hll�://WWw.Ci.IKJdNN.US �
;ommunity Development Plot date: Nov 6,2007;C�lmagiclMAGIC03 APR
1
4� O �� --4� \ t .
n� � �
� ! �
� t O � ,1
� � ° �
/ , �
� � � _o�o,::�
- �� ,,� o �u i
_--o-- �o ' �, +
� :� r r�� � � � � . l
� C " ,�• ` , . � , � �� .� � .
. �Q��� h �� � �� �
. �� � �
, ' � O O � /
O � 4� �� y�� .�� � � . . 1 .
� ' 4 � � . . - . 4• '
,�
r f{y�
k �
i r
J �
' i �
. ' '� ; i `r ._ . .
+ � �
. . . �' k g . � J � `1 �
� , . _ _ . . . � . .
� ' � � �
o : � _ : �
:� rt - - �
:� � �
f'��.
� '� ..{ I � � _`w�1
, �° �. ',,�, �;
ti � � , �
�jY, �. �i �R:
� � � � �� - � � p ���. 4��1��
r . . .'�� � �1 .
� � � �� � �
f •I �
�i� p � ' p t�s
O ; ��,, ..� ; T y �
� � FQ
r / k. � ,t
.` f �I� I � t. � ' ` 4 •
1 : � 1 O �
� � x � '��� ` � .� � TlL 1 l�i� � ^
. 1 � a �(� '�T�!
�F k ; t � �1 � � ,' i�.� � - ���. r � 1 � .�
� � } � �4^'�._{�� ' { 1 '_x I 4 + \ .�
.,�, } � ��1 i ,t � ,�y t � Y
- z;`y � ..�r . � . ___
t f � � i 1
O ° , t �, y 'r ,' ; a }" "-":'J i .
I � M � S � :
I 1 .1
� i i.. � Y` 0 {I I s�' r � { �.�4.
.� p :, � � 4�4���
o�� �-°� ���q�
, . .
° _ -_ - ���4
� --.. �T._ -____--
� o� i
' °� � _� � _'�_ c ---
�o��=: �;
�'vUG��U�0000C�O�JC���t��00000G
�gy o a p "�- p o "� R e3 �� j tf f 1 d � i ! i ! 1 ! HA"� ° ��� �����
'� � ` � '�g� ��� �� 1�1 E� �i��,9i ��i � �� Ye��� !i � � � � � a � ���R � � � ��� a i ° � �;
; �>'�t�� '��0 9�q��� �E��� � g���°°� 5 ¢!���l� ���'�i�y�� � aa , t � � � a ���a� � � ���(�� 3j�y �� ;1 ����
� a�pq• i� 'f �.� °�� � e6 ��'��� $ �.:: � ; �° �'��� �y `� 7 9 9 �tf!7 ��� t—f � Y� 9i �i� 1 �
� � ! 6 e�lq 1 v��j�'j t�� �`�+i �F �a�� € I �'ta I f { � � 5 �� i ! I �j �' �� 0 ! � '' � i 'y � �
�1•g'�{6 i��� a ..�a9�a��� ° !4.� ��4����3�' �l�i�'°��-0�� �� f9 y��4� � j i i � 1 � �y�1�a� � � j 1 � °1a �"1l�7 � �3 � � ; il � f
q' f bf p� �i � 1 E �� ��'�c ¢ S e�dl i �. g . i � E � 4 � i (� f
`��� �.�p� iT� � p � '�'{1� ���� � �€ 1� 9�� �"v�� d�9�i i � a �C���4 � � ° ; 4 � 9 � � � ° ��
� �a��+ is 1� ° 9 ` , l�d iij o u. �7@ �� a� � � � j o Ba �i ( r ��- a i � � � � �
���3 � �y'S���' ! �� �A��.���p�i��j�4��! �� ��°Q� 93 � 6Cq� � � �i � � � ( j� Et � � � �i � � � � � � � a
���� ��{t°•� p � s a� �6�E����. �� � ' pI �i i� j?� �`� � � �� �i ! ' y a � � � � ° �
a � da 3 S� 1 t;� 6 �� � �� ��i �� ; �:` 'f � � i , � - �' i � � � �
� D � � �� � --
� � `''�. � � ? dP�' ` — F�3� --
3 O � a� �I, ' ( ■ �� ��OFiD ♦1 H / �OJ� I����j �����, -.-`�
N PiOQ � � Ia� �� �� �� I II
c� � I I • ' J
'�1 I ----- - _ '� E���R� 1 _ .__�
, � Miller Nash 12/13/2007 2 :39:38 PM PAGE 001/QQ3 Miller Nash LLP.
. • st�s• �� ;�,i �
'^��� 1
� � 3 .Z��
P��
;�,f 4-�r ql� �,,;..�,
�;�p - ���t
� PORTLAND.O�EGO�+ -]��75���,.���. 340U U.S. B�ncorp`fower
7
SEAT7LE,w�sHincrun il I S.W.FiRh Avenue
MILLER NASH��� �ANGOWER,wnsniHCron ,�oit,and.Orcgon97204-3699
CENTRALONEGON
n�roKNErS A��,nw WWW,MILi.ERNASH.COM OPFICE 503.224.5858
Fnx 503.224.0155
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
DA�rr;: llecember i3, 200� REFERENCE: 065400-booi
To:
NAME: F,vc No.: PHONE NO.:
Ms. Cheryi Caines �503) 59g-19bo
Ms. Kim McMillan
City of Tigard
FRQM: Kelly S. Hossaini PHONE: (�03) 205-2332
RE: Broadway Rose Theater-Cafeteria Renovation
N[JMBER OF PAGES WITH COVER PAGE: 3
Messa e:
CONFIDENTLAL
1�H�: {VN'ORMATION CON'TAINED IN THIS FACSIMILF. IS CONFIDENTIAl, AtiD :�tAY AISO CONTA[N PRIVILEGED ATIORNEY'-
CLfENT INFOR�IATION OR WORK PRODUCT. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDNIDUAL OR
EN"CITY'TO WHUM IT(S ADDRESSED. IF YOU ARE NOTTHE INTENDED RECIPIENf,ORTHE EMPLOYEE OR AGENf RESPONSIBLE
TO DF.I.NER IT TO THE INTENDED REC[P1F,Nf,YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THATAiVY USE,DISSEMINATION,DISTRIBUPION OR
CUPY[NG OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS 5['RICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECBIVEll THE FACSIMILE 1N ERROR,PLEASE
IMMF.DIATEI.Y VOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE,AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MFSSACE TO US ATTHE ADDRESS ABOVE V1A THE U.S.
POSTAL SER�ICE. THAI�'K YOU.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES,PLEA.SE CALL
LALJRA MOSSBFRGF.R AT(503)Zo5-2399�SOON AS POSSIBLE.
. - Miller Nash 12/13/2007 2 ;39: 38 PM PAGE 002/003 Miller Nash LLP.
� 3400 U.S.Eiancu�p"fowrr
.nan Arvo,owr�,�„ 111 S.W.Fihh Avenue
,E A7TLE.'mn.i�i!vt,•;r� portland,Orc�on 97204•3G99
MILLER NASH��, ,��,«�„�ER .�,.., ... „ ,�
oarice 50322a.5R58
'�tNTRAI.OREi;(71v raz SO3.224.(11�5
� . . -� -.� WW0.'.MILLERNASIi.IOM
Krlly S.liossuini
;:c I l v.hossaini p�mi Ilernash.com
�5��3)=�5-1332 dircct linc
Decemhcr 13, 200?
�'IA FACSIMILE
Ms. Cheiyl Caines
Cit��of Tigard
i3i2�S.W. F-�all Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Subject: Broadway Rose Theater-Cafeteria Renovation
CL"P 200�-00002
Ucar Cher�-1:
We represent Tigard-Tualatin School District(the"District") with respect
to thc abo��e-referenced application. In the December io, 200�,staff report,staff
included two conditions of approval with which the District disagrees. These are
conditions z4 and 25, which are found on page four af the staff report. These conditions
require additional right-of-way dedication along SW School Street and the execution of
a c•estrictive covenant regarding future SW School Street improvements. The District
has recently had discussions with Kim McMillan, and she and the District have reached
an agreernent��'ith respect to the revision of those two conditions, as follows:
i. Condition 24 should be revised to read: "Additional right-of-way
shall Ue dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW School Street to increase the
right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline."
2. Condition 25 should be deleted.
PDXDOCS 1504129 1
C95400 50C1
� , Miller Nash 12/13/2007 2 :39:38 PM PAGE 003/003 Miller Nash LLP.
� �'URiI.�ND ��.ui.<;i�..
SFA�7Lt,w+vi.�•�.i.��.
MILLER NASH ���COLIYER m.+ ��irrn_�:v
'� F.NTRAL UREGON
a���!vn�����.;�r i n�v W WW.MILLERNASH COM
Ms. Chervl Caines
December i3, 200�
Page 2
I'lease enter this letter into the record. We also respectfully request that
the conditions of approvai be revised accordingly. Please do not hesitate to contact me if
��oii have a�y qucstions.
Ve truly yours,
K lly . Hossaini
cc: Mr. Rob S. Saxton
Ms. Francesca Gambetti
Ms. Kim McMillan
F�oxl�ocS��soaizy i
cssaoo soci
� -- --— -- - —
Depending on the number ot �,eople wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may lirnit the
amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes.
The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated
by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony.
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2007 �
PAGE 1 OF�
FILE NAME: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE,
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE
PROPONENT - (Speaking In Fa�or or Neutral) OPPONENT - (Spealang Against) �
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
I
1
� — — - — -I— - — - - - —
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
I
� � �
I — — — — I
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. —I N ,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
�
�
Name Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � - I me Add s,Zip Code and Phone No.
I
I I
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
I
I �
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
I
I
— — � — — — — — — — — — � — —I— — — — — — — — — — — — — � —
1
�
�� City of Tigard
� Hearings Of f icer — A enda
g
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007, 7:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
STAFF REPORTS: Available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer
meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext.2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 ('I'DD-
Telecommunications Devices for the Deafl. Upon request,the Citywill also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language
interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead tune as
possible. To request such services,please notifythe Cityof Tigard of your need(s) by5:00 p.m.no less than one (1) week
prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can rnake the appropriate arruigements.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE - CAFETERIA RENOVATION
CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2007-00002
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Pernlit approval to renovate a
cafeteria/auditorium at C.F. Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre.
Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition. The renovated building will be used as theatre space
and administrative offices for the Broadway Rose.
LOC'�ATTON: 12850 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102C�, Tax Lot 100 and WGTM 2S102BCti TaY Lot
8700.
ZONE: R 12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R 12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a
full range of housing rypes at a mui'unum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional
uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW C�ITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and '
18.810.
HEARINGS OFFICER AGENDA— DECEMBER 10, 2007
Ciry of Tigard � 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 � 503-639-4171 � www.tigard-or.gov � Page 1 of 2
2.2 "APPEAL" OF SUNRISE LANE SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION(SUB) 2007-00008
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2007-00002
TREE REMOVAL (TRE) 2007-00001
ITEM LTNDER APPEAL: On October 25, 2007,the Director issued a decision approving, with conditions
of approval, a request to subdivide 79 lots on an approximately 19.95-acre site, development on slopes
greater than 25%, and removal of 121 trees located in areas of steep slopes. John Rankin on behalf of his
client, Constantin Costiuc, tunely filed an appeal by the appeal deadline of November 8, 2007. Tlvs appeal
raises issues previously raised in the appellant's comment letter submitted during the development review
process. The specific grounds of the appeal are set forth in the appellant's letter and attachments, which are
available for view in the land use file at the City's Pernzit Center. The appellant appeals the decision based
on the allegation that the Applicant, in its application materials, and the City, in its decision, have failed to
provide street and utility access to the middle portion of the Costiuc Tax Lot 100 property, resulting in
d'unuiished value of the subject property.
LOCATION: The project is located north and east of SW Suru�se Lane at SW 150`}' within Tigard's
incorporated boundary;WCTM 2S105DD,Tax Lots 400, 500 1000, 1100, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, and 1700.
ZONE: R 7: The R 7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached
single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a m;n;mum lot size of 5,000 square feet,
and duplexes, at a min�mum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also
pern�itted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. REVIEW
CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Comprehensive Plan; Commuruty Development Code Chapter
18.810.030.
3. OTHER BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
HEARINGS OFFICER AGENDA- DECEMBER 10, 2007
City of Tigard � 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 � 503-639-4ll1 � www.tigard-or.gov � Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item: 2.1
Hearin Date: Deceinber 10,2007 Titne: 7:00 PM
STAFF REPORT TD THE ,�
HEARINGS OFFICER `
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
120DAYS = 2/16/08
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE - CAFETERIA RENOVATION
CASE NO: Conditional Use Permit(CUP) CLTI'2007-00002
APPLICANT: Broadway Rose Theatre Co. APPLICANT'S Shiels, Obletz, &Johnsen
P.O. Box 231004 �p,; Attn: Francesca Gambetti
Tigard,OR 97281 1140 SW 11th Ave., Suite 500
Portland,OR 97205
OWNER Tigard-Tualatin School District
6960 SW Sandburg St.
Tigard, OR 97223
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a
cafeteria/auditorium at C.F. Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the
Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition.
The renovated building will be used as theatre space and administrative offices for
the Broadway Rose.
LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant Avenue;WCIIVI 2S102C�,Tax Lot 100 and WCTM 2S102BC,Tax
Lot 8700.
COMPREHE NSIVE
PLAN AND
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R 12: Medium-Densiry Residential District. The R 12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a inulunum lot size of 3,050 square
feet.A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also pemzitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18330, 18360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705,
18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearin�s Officer find that the proposed Gonditional Use Pemzit will not adversely
affect the health safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use.
Themfore,Staff recommends APPROVAL,subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(C[JP2007-00002) PAGE 1 OF 30
12/10/07PUBLICHEARING STAFFREPORTTOTHE HEARINGS OFFI(�R
r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWINGCONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS:
Su nut to e P ann�ng Depattment ery Caines, 639-4171,ext 2437 or review an approva :
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a revised
site plan showing the areas illui7unated bythe proposed and e�sting lighting.
2. Prior to building permit issuance the ap plicant shall provide a revised site plan f or review and approval
showing the front yard setback from C�rant Avenue.
3. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Plaruling Division for review and
approval that shows the following prior to site pernut�ssuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a rauo o} at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer nuuung along the northern property, except where the e�sting parking area
prolubits installation.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
E. A detail of the masonrywall and gate proposed forthe refuse collection area.
4. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler
indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements.
5. Prior to building pernzit issuance the applicant shall submit plans that indicate the location of all
rooftop equipment and the gas meter.
6. Prior to issuance of site pernuts, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing four accessible
parking spaces as required by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a bike rack detail for the
Planning Division review and approval.
8. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning
and Engineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees and trees
10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment, vehicles, machinery, grading, dumping, storage, burial of
debris, or any other construction-related activities in any tree protection zone; and
C. A note statu7g that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal pl�an are
authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other provision of this title,
any pai-t�.�found to be m violauon of tlus chapter [18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the
Tigard 1Vlurucipal Code shall be subject to a civ�l penalty of up to $500 and shall be
requu-ed to remedy any dama�ge caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include
but not be lirruted to the followin : 1) Keplacement of unlaa�full removed or damagec�
trees in accordance with Section 18g790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development Code• and 2)
Payment of an additional civil penalry representulg the estunated value of any un�awfully
removed or damaged tree, as deternuned usulg the most current International Society of
Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal.
9. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencin as directed by the pro-J�ect
arborist to protect the trees to be retauied. The applicant shall call�or an inspection and allow
access by the Ciry Arborist for the purp ose of morutonng the tree protection to verify that the tree
protection measures are perforn�ing adequately.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CCJP2007-00002) PAGE 2 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TI-IE HEARINGS OFFICER
10. '11�e applicant shall have an on-going responsibiliry to ensure that the Project Arborist has
submitted wntten reports to the City Arbonst at Ieast once every two weeks, as the Project
Arborist monitors the construcuon activrties from uutial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing
installation through the buildin construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and
location of the tree protection�encing, eieterrrune if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any
part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. If the repons are not submitted to the City
Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TT'Z's or the Tree Protection Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor the City can stop work on the project until
an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and t�ie Pro�ect Arbonst. Prior to �ssuance of any
Certificates of Occupancy, the Pro�ect Arbonst will submit a final certification indicating the
elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remauung trees on the site are
healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment.
11. If work is required within an established tree protection zone the project arborist shall prepare a
proposal deta�ling the construction techniques to be employ�ec� and the likely unpacts to the trees.
The proposal shall be reviewed and ap�proved by the Ciry Arborist before proposed work can
pr�oceed withui a tree protection zone. The Cat�r Arbonst may require changes prior to approval.
The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring withui the tree protection zone and
subrrut a summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not
significantly unpact the health and/or stability of the trees.
12. Prior to issuance of building pernzits,the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that were preserved,
the location of tree protection fencui .
B. Submit a statement and signature o�approval from a certified arborist regarding building
and infrastructure siting techruques to be employed in construcuon v�nth respect to any
protected trees on site.
13. Prior to issuance of site pernlits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how the vision
clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
14. Prior to issuance of a site pernut, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pemzit is re uired for this
project to cover street improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way. �ix (6) sets of
detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the En�ineenng Department.
NOTE: these plans are in addrtion to any drawings required by the Building Drvision and shot�ld only
include sheets relevant to public unprovements. I'ublic Faciliry Improvement (PFI)pernut plans shall
conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and
the Cit}�s web page (www.tigard-or.gov).
15. The PFI erniit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the
individua�or corporate entiry who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the
financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation
limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state althui which the entiry is u7corporated anc�
provide the nacne of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate uiforn�ation to the
Engineering Department will delayprocessulg of proJect documents.
16. Final design plans and calculations for the pro osed private water guality faciliry shall be submitted to
the Engineenng Department (Kim McMillan� as a part of the 1'ublic Faciliry Improvement (PFI)
pemzit plans. Included with the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan.
17. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pern�it
drawings. The plan shall confonn to the "Erosion Prevenuon and Sediment Control Design and
Plaruzing ManuaC,Febnzary 2003 edition."
18. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Perniit issued by the Ciry of Tigard pursuant to ORS
468.746 and the Federal C�ean Water Act.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 3 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO Tf�HEARINGS OFFIC�R
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
Su mit to e P amm�g Department ery Caines, 639-4171,e�rt. 2437 or review an approva :
19. Prior to placement of any signs on site, the applicant shall a�pply for a si�n permit and supply staff
with the appropnate plans to venfy compliance with TDC Chapter 18.78 .
20. Prior to final buildin�inspection,the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any
existing tree greater than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous
accordui�g to a cert�fied arborist. The deed restnction may be removed or will be considered
invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a
hazardous tree.
21. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contact the Staff Planner, Cheryl Caines, 639-
4171, e�. 2437 for final walk-through. All site unprovements inust be complete per approved
plans.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kiin McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
22. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the water quality/detention facility and
any work in the public right-of-way(or pubhc easement) and obtain approvaI from the Engineenng
Depattment.
23. Prior to a final building inspection,the one-waytraffic flow markings shall be installed at the driveways
as shown on Sheets A1.02 and C2:1.
24. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the fronta�e of SW School Street to
increase the nght-of-way to 10 feet from the centerline. Additional ROW shall be dedicated at the SE
temvnus to provide for a portion of an offset cul-de-sac bulb. The CityEngineer staff will provide the
design of the offset cul-de-sac bulb. The description shall be tied to the e�stu��g nght-of-way
centerluie. The dedication document shall be on City forn�s. Instrucuons are available from the
Engineering Department.
25. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the
future unprovements and right-of-waydedication of SW School Street ad�acent to the subject property,
when any of the f ollowing events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for bythe formation
of a Local Improvement Distnct,
B. when the un rovements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the �ty or other public agency,
G when the unprovements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construcuon of the improvements �s deemed to be appropriate by the City.Engineer in
conjiuiction with construction of unprovements by others adjacent to the subject site.
26. To ensure compliance with C1ean Water Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall
em�loy the design enguieer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality
fac ty to perForm construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for comphance wrth
the design and spec�fications. These inspections shall be made at significant sta ge�s, and at compl�euon
of the construction. Pnor to final building inspection, the design eng ineer shall provide the C:iry of
Tigard Engineering staff with written confu�mation that the water quality facility�s ui compliance with
the design and spec�ficauons.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE
HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
BROADWAY AOSE RENOVATION(CCJP2007-00002) PAGE 4 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Information and Site Historv:
The site is an 8.9 acre parcel at the end of Grant Avenuet south of Walnut Street and west of Pacific
Highway. It is develop ed with an elementary school, C. F. Tigard Elementary adininistrative building, and
a multi-purpose buildulg (cafeteria/auditonum). There are a tew trees locatec� around the peruneter of the
site.
Land use approval was granted through CUI'2003-00002 to reconstruct the existing school after the
original builduig was demolished. Other records include a Site Development Review in 1979 for a 10 000
square foot expansion to the multi-purpose building and a Minor Mod�fication to place a moc�ular
classroom on-site in 1996. Tigard Ciry Council amended the Development Code in June 2007 to allow
Major Event Entertairiment as a conditional use in residential zones.
Vicinity I nf ormation:
The area is made up of a mix of commercial and residential zones. Properties along Pacific Highway are
developed with commercial uses. The residential areas have a mix of single-familyhomes and multi-farruly
developments.
Proposal Descri�tion:
The proposal is to renovate the multi-purp ose,building to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre
Company. The ex.isting 10,600 s quare foot 6uilduig will 6e renovated. Two small additions totaluig 2,600
square feet are proposed for a lobby and a scene shop. The space will include 236 permanent theatre seats
and office space for 6 adnurustrat�ve staff. Site changes include additional parkuig and an access drive
around the building.
SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE
Use Classification: Section 18.130.020
Lists the Use Categories.
The applicant is proposuig to renovate a multi-purpose building at G F.Ti,gard Elementa.ry School for use as a
theatre and related offices. T�us use is defined as Ma�or Event Entertauiment within the use classification
section of the Tigard Development Code. Major Event Entertainment is pern�itted by Condiuonal Use in the
residential zones.
Summary Land Use Perniits: Chapter 18.310
Defines fhe decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned.
The proposed use is a Conditional Use,which is a Type III-HO(Hearings Officer) decision.
SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA
A stulunary of the applicable criteria in the Chapter order in which they are addressed are as f ollows:
A. 18.330 S ecific Conditional Use Criteria
Gener Approval Criteria)
AdditionalC,onditions of A proval)
B. licable Develo mentpCode Standards
1 . 30 Conditional se)
18.360 Site Development Review�
18.510 sidential Zonin Districts)
18.705 Access,Egress &�culation)
18.725 nvirorunental Perfonnance Standards�
18.745 dscaping and Screening�
18.755 ' ed Solid Waste&Recyclable Storage)
18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)
18.780 Signs
18.790 ree moval)
18.795 isual Clearance)
C. Street and Utili Im rovement Standa�ls 18.810
D. Im act Stud 1 .39
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 5 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC F--IEARING STAFF REPORT TO TI-�HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIAAND FINDINGS
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIQNAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 18.330.OIO.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures
under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropnate and
if other appro.priate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the
nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review
and analysis.
Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed
as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050 using ap roval criteria
contained in Section 1$330.030A and subject to other requirements in C�iapter 18.33�.
GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR A CONDITIONAL USE: SECTION 18.330.030
The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs o the proposed use;
The site is 8.9 acres�approximately 387,680 square feet). The existing bwlding is 10,600 square feet with a
2,600 square-foot ad ition proposed: Even with the proposed building and parkuig lot additions, there is still
ample land for the other school building and related fac�l.ities. As demonstrated u-i the application and this
report,the site size is adequate for the needs of the proposed use.
The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering the size, shape,
location,topography,and natural features;
Imp a�cts from the proposed uses are expected to include traffic and possible noise. The use will be contained
within the 8.9 acre site. Only those homes directly adjacent to the multi-purpose building and along Grant
Avenue will be impacted by the use. The applicant states that performances will be held four days a week
during f ive months of the year. Vehicle tnps per da}'are estunated to be below 500. There are no natural
features such as steep slopes,strearns or wetlands on the site.
All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the pmposal;and
All public facilities including streets, stonn, and sanitary sewers have adequate ca aciry to serve the site as
discussed in detail elsewhere in this report. The bwldulg will be utilizing e�sting ut�ty luzes and upgrades are
being made where necessary.
The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter.
The proposed site is located within the R 12 zoning district. Major Event Entertainment uses are
permitted conditionally. As discussed in this report, the pro�ect will meet the applicable requirements of
the zoning district.
The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to
Chapter 18J80, Signs, and C,hapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met or can be
conditioned to be satisfied.
The applicable review criteria in this case include the following.chapters of the Communiry Development
Code: T8330 Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18370 Decision Makui Procedures•
18.510, Resic�ential Zonin D�stricts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circuiation; 18.725, �nvironmenta�
Performance Standards• 1�J45, Landscaping and Screerung; 18J65, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs;
18.790,Tree Removal; 1�.795,Vuual Clearance Areas;and 18.810,Street and UtiliryImprovement Standards.
The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report.
The proposal contains no elements related to the rovisions of the following chapters: 18350, Planned
Development; 18.370, Variances and AdJ�ustments; 1�380, Zonin Ma p/Text Amendments; 18.410, Lot Line
Ad�ustments; 18.420, Land Partitions• 18.430, Subdivisions; 18.�10 L:ocrunercial Zoning Districts• 18.520
In�ustrial Zoning D�stricts• 18.620 Tigard Tnangle Desig n Standarc�s; 18.630 Washi�n�ton Square �egiona�
Center; 18.640 Durham �uarry �esign Standards; 18.710 Accessory Resic�ential LTnits; 18J15 Densiry
Computations;, 18.720j Desi n Compatibility Standards; 1�.730 Exceptions to Development Standards;
18J40, Histonc Overay� ,1�742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Re�l a_uons;
18J60, Nonconfomiing �m�ations; 18J75 Sensitive Lands; 18J85, Temporary Uses; and 18J98,-Wu-eless
Communications Facilities. These chapters are,therefore,found to be inapplicable as approval standards.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CCJP2007-00002) PAGE 6 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TI-�HEARINGS OFFIC�R
The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Community Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with Comprehensive
Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the
development code as addressed within this report.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use are satisfied.
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE.
Section 18.330.030.B states that the Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of
a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in
the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surroundin uses and public facilities
is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the�ollowing:
Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation;
Evening performances are planned to be held at 8:00 pm. on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights.
Sunday matinees w�ll be at 2:00 p.m. Performances will ta-ke place in January, March, May, September and
November. The Broadway Rose and Tigard-Tualatin School Distnct will collaborate to ensure that there
will be no conflict between performances and events held at C. F. Ti�ard Elementary School. There is no
evidence in the record to suggest that there is a need to further limit t-he hours, days, place and/or manner
of operation of the Broadway Rose.
Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air
poliution, glare, odor and/or dust;
The applicant is working with an acoustical consultant to m;n�m;�e sound impacts on the theatre space.
As a result, the e�ernal sound impacts will be ini.nunal as well. No outdoor activities are proposed.
Buffering is also proposed along the propenyline closest to the building. This criterion is satisfied.
Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width;
The site is 8.9 acres and the building exceeds those setbacks required for the conditional use. Requiiing
additional setbacks,lot area size and lot width are not necessary. Tl-lis criterion is met.
Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site;
The Broadway Rose is utili�in an existing mt�lti-purpo� se building on the G F. T�igard site. Approximatel
52% of the site �s covered wit� impervious surface. Two small, sin le-story additions are proposed, but a�
not exceed 24 feet in height. The in�unum height for the zone is 35�eet.
Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points;
The applicant is utilizin two of the four e�sting access drives onto Grant Avenue. Both were approved
under the CLJI'2003-00�02 for the new C. F. Tigard Elementary building. No changes are proposed to the
access drives.
Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved;
The site fronts on two public streets, Grant Avenue and School Street. No ri ht-of-way dedication or
street improvements are required along Grant Avenue. Dedication of right-o�way �s pro osed along
School Street (7 feet). This amount was based on requirements outlined in the Engineenng �ivision Pre-
Application Meetulg notes. Further research has revealed that 17 feet is the necessary amount to compl�y
v,nth current requ�rements. This is discussed in more detail under the Streets and Utilities section of this
report.
Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas;
These items are addressed later in this report. As conditioned, the proposal will meet the prescribed
requirements of the TDC.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 7 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs;
Compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone will be considered once a desig n is
reviewed. Sign locations were shown on the elevation plans, but no specifics were given on style and size.
The applicant will be required to submit detailed plans prior to sign pernut �ssuance.
Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting;
E�sting and proposed light poles are shown on the site plan. The applicant states that design build
lighting �s proposed. A rev�sed site plan is conditioned under the Site Development Review section of tlus
repon showuig the areas illununated byproposed lighting.
Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their
installation and maintenance;
A buffer is proposed along the northern boundary of the site to lessen impacts on adjacent residential uses.
Other neighboring uses are separated from the pro�ect by large setbacks and bu�ldings. This item is
discussed u7 more deta�l later in the report.
Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences;
A chain link fence e�sts around the entire property. Along the northern property line the applicant has
proposed to install vertical slats to provide more screerung from the neighboring residential uses. This
cntenon�s satisfied.
Rec�uiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses,
habitat areas and/or drainage areas;
Only trees necessary for construction will be removed. Trees on neighboring properties will need to be
protected dunng construction. There are no watercourses, habitat areas or drauiage areas on site that
require special protection. As demonstrated later in this report, the applicant meets, or can be conditioned
to meet tlus crrtenon.
Requiring the dedicatioii of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoinin and within the
anddplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 10�-year floodplain;
There is no floodplain on or adjacent to the site. This criterion is satisfied.
Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with
the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
There are no planned or existing pedestrian/bicycle pathways on or adjacent to the site. This criterion is
satisfied.
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE TYPES:
SECTION 18330.050
Ma or Event Entertainment:
a. �he minimum lot size shall be two acres;
b. Setbacks:
(1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 30 feet;
(2) On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet on any side
facing a street, plus meets visual clearance areas, Chapter 18.795;
3 The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet;
4 The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 30 feet; and
5 Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet.
c. With re ard to off-street arking: Exem t if constructed with a school use for school activities
only. Ot�erwise, requirements shall comp�y with Section 18.765;
BROADWAY KOSE RENOVATION(CCJP2007-00002) PAGE 8 OF 30
12/10/07PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORTTO'I1-IE HEARINGS OFFICER
d. On school sites the use must be within existing buildings of 10,000 square feet or greater.
Expansions based on the original square footage, up to a maximum of 50°Io are allowed.
The project site is 8.9 acres; this exceeds the ininunum 2 acres required. The site fronts onto Grant Avenue
which dead-ends into a cul-de-sac. An addition for the scene shop will decrease the existing front yard setback
to ap�proximately 44 feet. The site has no other fronta e and is therefore not considered a corner or through
lot. The side yard setback to the north is 65 feet and �17 feet to the south based on the site plan. The rear
yard setback is 125 feet. Setback requirements are not ulcreased because the building height is only24 feet.
Off-street parking is required since the Broadwa Rose shows are not part of the schooPs regular activities.
Parking is discussed in fLUther detail under the Of�Street Parkin�g section of this report. The BroadwayRose is
prop osulg the new use within an e�sting 10,600 square-foot building. An expansion of up to 5,300 square feet
�s allowed bythe code. The two proposed addrtions total 2,600.
B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(18.360�
The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found
to be consistent with the vanous standards of the Community Development Code. The
proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections.
18.360.090 Approval Criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following
criteria when approving,appmving with conditions,or denying an applicat�on:
Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this tide including Chapter 18.810, Street and
Utility Standards;
This will be addressed in the relevant other sections of this report.
Relationship to the natural and physical environmen�
a. Buildings shall be:
(1) Located to preserve e�cisting trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon
e�sting site conditions;
�2 Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding;
3� Located to provide adequate distance between adjoirung buildings for adequate light, air
ci�ulation,and fire-fight�ng;and
(4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind.
b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements
of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal.
The applicant has proposed removal of five of the eleven trees on-site. The Project Arborist states that
measures will be taken to try to preserve two of these five trees during construction, and one of the trees is
hazardous. The reinainuig two trees must be removed to create a new building entry and plaza for bicycle
parking. The Broadway Rose is using an existing building and is not proposuig any changes to the present
Iocation, only two small additions. Therc are no other bwldings nearby. This allows adequate hght and air
circulation along with fu-e-fighting access.
Exterior elevations:
a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures...
This is not a single-familyor multi-familyproject. Tlvs standard does not apply.
Buffering, screenin and compatibility between adjoining uses:
a. Buffenng shall �e provided between differenttyp es of land uses for example, between single-
family and multiple-family residential, and residendal and comme�ia�uses, and the following factors
shall be considered in deterniining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer...
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVA7TON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 9 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFIC�'.R
Based on the Buffering Matrix (Table 18.745.1), buffering is required between the proposed use, Ma�or Event
Entertauunent, and the neighboring residenual uses. As discussed under the Landscaping and �creening
section of this report,the butfering requu-emenu can be met.
Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses:
This is not a multi-familyproject,therefore this standard is inapplicable.
Private outdoor area: multi-family use:
This is not a multi-fa.inilyproject,therefore this standard is inapplicable.
Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use:
This is not a multi-familyproject,therefore this standard is inapplicable.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain...
This area does not abut or lie within a 100-year floodplain. The nearest floodplain is over 1,160 feet to the
northwest of the site along Fanno Creek. The flood elevation at that point is 160 feet, while the lowest
elevation on the subject site is 198. Therefore this standard is not applicable. �
Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention:
a. The structures and site improvements shall 6e designed so that public areas such as streets or
public gathering places, seini-public areas and private outdoor areas are cleady defined to establish
persons having a ri ht to be in the space, to provide for crime prevent�on and to establish
maintenance respons�ility; and
The proposed project is designed for public and semi-public use. The parking lot and sidewalks will lead
theatre goers to the building entry and lobby. Based on elevauons provided b�the applicant, the rnain entry
will be clearly marked through the use of a large,architecttual cover and glass. rash service areas will be gated
to prevent entry-by unauthorized persons.
Crime prevention and safety:
a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants;
b. Interior laund�y and setvice areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others;
c.Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic;
d. The exterior lightin levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas
vulnerable to crime;an�
e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in
potent�ally dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt�rade changes. Fixtures
shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overiap at a height of seven teet which is sufticient to
illuminate a person.
Windows are located so that much of the properry can be surveyed by the building occupants. New windows
will be added to the north side of the building ul the proposed office area. The lobby is enclosed by glass,
enabling the south and eastem sides of the building to be morutored from inside and outside the building. The
a�estern fa ade is located along Grant Avenue. It can be easily seen from the street and the adjacent school
building. �igard Police were given a copy of the proposal and did not note concerns about crime prevention
or safety.
The applicant is proposing design-build eaterior h�hting. New and existing light poles are shown on the site
plan, 6ut no spec�fics are given on the fixtures. The apphcant states in the narrative that lighting levels will be
selected and angles onented towards areas vulnerable to crime. A revised site plan must be subrrutted that
shows the areas to be illwrunated by e�sting and proposed lighting to ensure these standards are met.
FINDING: Based on the information provided, it cannot be deterniined if required lighting
standards are met.
BROADWAY ROSE REN�VATION(CUI'2007-00002) PAGE 10 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPOAT TO Tf-�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R
CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit for review and
approval a revised site plan showulg the areas illwrunated by the proposed and existing
hghting.
Public txansit�
a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is
adjacent to or within 500 feet of et:isting or proposed transrt route...
The site is not adjacent to a transit route; the nearest trarisit stops are at the intersection of Walnut Street and
Grant Avenue and Walnut Street and Pacific Highway. The routes are within 500 feet of the project. Public
sidewalks connect the site to both routes. No comments were received from Tri-met requinng upgrades to
e�sting facilities. Tlvs criterion is not applicable.
Landscaping:
a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requireinents set focth in Chapter 18.745;
b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a
miniinum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be
landscaped;and
c. A mimmusn of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped.
The site plan shows trees and shrubs, but no details are given on type or size. Approximately 52% of the site is
impervious area. Landscaping or natural vegetation covexs the rema;n;ng 48% of the site. Th�s standard is
met.
Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accorclance with the criteria in the adopted 1981
master drainage plan;
Drainage will be reviewed under 18.810, Utilities. The prop osed storm drainage plan has been designed in
accordance with C1ean Water Services (C�X/S) Design and C:onstn.iction Standards which meet or exceed the
requirements of the 1981 master drainage plan.
Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the
requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447;and
The applicant states that the development is being designed in accordance with ADA requirements. The
applicant has provided two accessible parking spaces near the mau�entrance. Typically ADA requu-ements are
reviewed bythe Tigard Building Div�sion dw-uig the site and building penrut process.
All of the pmvisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other
sections or this tide, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a vanance or adjustment granted
under Chapter 18.370.
The applicant is meeting all regulations of the underlying zone (R 12). No variances or adjustments are being
requested.
FINDING: The review criteria of the site development standards can be met as conditioned.
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS(18.510�
The R-12 zoning district is desi�ned to accommodate a full ran e of housing types at a minimum
lot size of 3,050 square fee� A wide range of civic and institutiona�uses are also permitted.
Section 18.520.040 states that I�evelopinent standards in Residential zoning districts are contained
in Table 18.520.2 below:
BROADWAYR05E RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 11 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO'THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-12 Existin�/Proposed
Minimum Lot Size 3,050 sq.ft. 387,684 sq.ft.
Avera e Minimum Lot Width None 243.15 ft.
Maxiinum Lot Covera e 80% 52%
Minimum Setbacks based on Conditional Use Aequirements (18330.050)
- Front yard 30 fr. 44 ft.[i]
- Side facing street on corner&through lots 25 ft. 417 ft.
- Side yard 25 ft. 65 ft.
- Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -
- Rear yard 30 ft. 125 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 35 ft. 24 ft.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement 20% 48%
[1]Measuremenc is esamared because Plan A1.00A dces not show the property line conecdy for Gran�Avenue. As-builu for the cul-de•sac show rhe property line 20
feet behind�he curti.
Based on the site plan and su� pplemental inforn�ation provided bythe applicant,the development standards for
the R 12 zone are met. The setback measurements are taken from Plan A1.00A. The R 12 setback
requirements are only for single and multi-farnily developments. Because the Broadway ftose is a conditional
use, the setbacks outluled above are the more restnctive setbacks required in the Conditional Use section of
the code. These requirements are met as discussed under the Conditional Use section of this repon. The
height,n�u�num lot width,and coverage requirements are met.
FINDING: The actual front yard setback cannot be deternzined from the infox7nation provided.
CONDITTON: Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
review and approval showing the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
ACCE SS, E GRE SS AND CIRCIJLATION�18.705�
No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as
provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be
�ulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan.
Access to the site will be via an existing drn�e to the north of the site. The one-way drn�e aisle and parking
will wrap around the building,�and traffic will exit by another existing, driveway to the south of the
building. A site plan showuig this access and drive pattern have been provided.
All vehicular access and e�ress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect
directly with a public or pnvate street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained
at the required standards on a continuous basis.
Plans provided show the access/egress points connecting with Grant Avenue, a public street.
Joint access:
Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same
access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of
land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal
evidence shall be �resented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the
joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file
with the City.
Joint egress is proposed for the existing southern driveway. The parcels are all under single ownership and
the school district has signed the land use application form. Therefore, thLC standard is met.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CCTP2007-00002) PAGE 12 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO 7T-�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R
Required Walkway Location
On-site pedestrian walkways shall comp1y with the following standards:
Walkways shall extend frorn the ground tloor entrances or trom the �round floor landing of stairs,
ram�s, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which
provide the reyuired acce�s and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections bet�veen
buildin�s in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless
impractical, walkways shalI be constructed between new and existing developments and
neighboring developments;
Concrete sidewalks will e�end from the lobby entrance and all other round floor entrances to the
e�sting sidewalk along Grant Avenue. E�sting sidewalks will connect t�e site with other C. F. Tigard
buildings and residences in the area.
Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellin�s) and multi-family developments, each
residential dwelling shall be connected by waIkway to the vehicular parking area, and common
open space and recreation facilities;
This criterion is not applicable to this proposal.
Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall
be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated
from inotor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or
a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are
permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropnate landsca�ing, pavement markings, or
contrasting pavement matenals are used. Walkways s1ia11 be a mimmum of four feet in width
exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, an�
sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards;
One sidewalk will cross the new drive aisle to the south of the building. The plans are marked with a
painted crosswalk All proposed walkways are at least 5 or 6 feet wide.
Re quired walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone,
brick, etc. Walkwa�ys may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purp oses.
Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition
to required pathways.
The walkways will be concrete as noted on the site plan and in the narrative. Lighting will be provided for
the parking areas and �s discussed further under the Site Development Review section of this report.
Access Management(Section 18.705.030.H):
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, si ht distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City
and AAS�TO.
The applicant's plans indicate that the access to the facility will be from the existing driveways. The
applicant states ui the narrative that the 24-foot wide drive aisle can accommodate two-way traffic.
However, to rrutigate traffic impacts with the existing parking lot, the applicant has proposed a one-way
traffic flow pattern. ThLC one-way traffic pattern is shown on Sheet A1.OZ.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be Qlaced in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersechons is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback
trom a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of way line
of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater
dependin� upon the influence area, as determined from City En�neer review of a traffic impact
report su mitted by the applicant's traftic en ineer. In a case w ere a project has less than 150
feet of street frontage, the applicant must exp�ore any option for shared access with the adjacent
parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CCTP2007-00002) PAGE 13 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO T�-IE HEARINGS OFFIC�.R
Grant Avenue is classified as a Neighborhood Route,therefore this criteri�n d�es n�t apply.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimuin spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets alon an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 12�feet.
Grant Avenue is classified as a Neighborhood Route (local street). The applicant is not proposing to
construct any new streets along Grant Avenue to serve this development, therefore th�s critenon does not
apply.
Section 18.705.030.J states that vehicle access, e ress and circulation for commercial and
industrial use shall not be less than 30 feet wide with�4 feet of pavement for 0-99 parking spaces.
Nmery-three spaces are proposed for the project. Only one access drive is required, but the app licant is
proposing two. Both access dnves provided are 30 feet w�ide with at least 25 feet of pavement. Curbing is
also provided.
FINDING: The access standards are not fullymet, but can be as conditioned below.
CONDITION: Prior to building permit issuance a copy of the lease agreement shall be provided that
establishes the jouzt access/egress for the two uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS- C.�IAPTER 18.725:
Requires that ederal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to
development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates:
Noise, visible emissions, vlbration and odors.
Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of
the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
Vsible Emissions. Within the Corrunerrial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I:P) zoning
district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- sou�e
emission, other than an emission from space heat�ng, or the emission of pure uncoinbined water
(steam) which is visible from a propetty line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Yules for
visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-2$-070) apply.
Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles,trains and aincraft is pernutted in
any given zoning district, which is discemible without instnunents at the property line of the use
concerned.
Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or odler matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable
at any oint beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors
(340-0�8-090) apply.
Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be
permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is
discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or
floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation
work otherwise pennitted by this title.
Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be
maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or
create a health hazard.
The applicant states there will be no noise, visible emissions, vibrations, odors, glare and heat and ir�sects and
rodents produced from the finished project. During the neighborhood meeting, neighbors asked about noise.
The applicant states within the Impact Studyprovided that an acou.sucal consultant has been retained to ensure
that there are rzunimal sound impacts on the theatre space. As a result, extemal sound impacts will be minunal
as well. The applicant also states that no outdoor actrviues are proposed, but the applicant does not speak to
noise frompatrons gathenng outside before and afterperfoi7�nces.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 14 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TF-�E HEARINGS OFFICER
FINDING: No evidence has been provided that noise from patrons will not be a problem. If for
some reason the above standards were in question, and it was subsequently found
that the use was out of compliance with any of the above standards the property
owner would be subject to code enforcement, court review, possi�ile fines, and
revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.
CONDI7TON: Prior to final ins�pection the applicant shall provide by mail, a letter to the property
owners along �rant Avenue and along the site's northem boundary statuig the
measures taken to prevent noise impacts and the contact information tor Broadway
Rose with noise complaints.
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING- CHAPTER 18.745:
All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. The plant material
shall be of hi�I� grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards
for Nurberg tock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions). Landscaping shall be
installed iii accordance with the provisions of this tide.
The accepted planting�procedures are the �u'delines described in the Tigard Tree.Manual. These guidelines
follow those set forth by the International Sociery of Arboriculture (ISA) tree plantu-ig guidelines as well as the
standards set fonh in the American Institute of Architects' Architectzu-al Grapluc Standards lOth edition. In
the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees �ased on the soil
volume and size at matunty. Additionally,there are directions for soil amendments and mod�fications.
Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met
or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond.
The applicant is� proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H This re�presents 85% retention of
trees over 12". Therefore,they are not required to mitigate and/or post a bond per T-igard Municipal Code.
Existin� vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible. The developer shall provide
methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process. The
�lants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be
enced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees).
The tree rotection plan does not show tree protection fencing for all of the trees to be retained. Specifically,
trees 100�0 10002, 10003, 10004, 10005 and 10006 do not have protection. The applica.nt must show
protection for these trees. Those trees t�at are a significant distance from construction activities may be
protected by plastic fencing instead of chain link Approved methods of protection are outlined under the
Tree Removal secuon of this rep ort. Conditions of approval under the same section will ensure protection
fencing is shown on the plan and installed.
Trees 10022 and 10023 are listed as retained on the gradin�g plan and removed on the tree� plan. The project
arborist noted that it may be possible to retain these trees it proper precautions are taken. The applicant must
clarify the status of these trees, keeping ui mind that eYistin vegetation should be protected as much as
possible. Methods of protection for these trees must be outline�if it is deternlined that protection is possible.
Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects frontin on a public street shall
be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040� Section 18.745.040.0
required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size
classification of the tree at matunty(small, medium or large).
The applicant has proposed to use e�sting trees as street trees. These trees were planted during construction
of the elementary school building to meet re�uirements of the 2003 Conditional Use. The applicant states that
the e�sting street trees will be protected and that no cutting or filling will take place with.in the drip-lines.
Land Use Buffering and Screening:
Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 15 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORTTO'II�HEARINGS OFFIC�A
Residential uses abut the property on three sides (north, south and west). Only those residential properties to
the north will be affected by the project. Based on the Buffer Matrix �I'able 18.745.1), a 10-20 foot buffer
�uffer combination D) �s requu-ed between residential uses and commercial uses (Major Event
ntertairunent). The applicant �s proposing a 15-foot buffer with a fence (chain link with slats) and a mix of
trees, shrubs and lawn. As shown on the site plan, this buffer does not run the fu11 length of the parcel and
should be extended.
There is an existin portion of the parking area which is non-confornung. It is screened with a chain link fence
and a hedge. The�ence and hedge will be preserved, and vertical slats will be added to the fence. Because the
applicant �s proposing to utilize an existulg parkuzg area and building full compliance is not possible. The
proposed plan brings the buffering as close to conforn�ance as �s possib�e at this tune.
The site plan provided does not indicate the species of trees and shrubs to be planted, but rather refers to a
detail sheet, A 1.03. This sheet was not �provided with the application, so Staff cannot determine if the
proposed trees meet the spacing standards. The buffering reqiurements can be conditionallymet.
Screenin :
Special�rovisions:
Sect�on 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parkin�� and loading areas. Landscaped parking
areas shall include s�ecial design features wh�ch eitectively screen the parking lot areas from
view. Plantin matenals to be installed should achieve a reIative balance between low lying and
vertical shrub�ery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas,
and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one i1) tree for each seven (7) parkin� spaces in
order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islan s shall be
three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of
wheel guard or curb.
Parking areas will be screened from neighboring properties as discussed above under Buffering and
Screerung. Trees are not shown at a ratio of one tree for every 7 parking spaces. There are 65 new
parking sp aces proposed and only five new trees. Based on the required ratio, at least ten trees should be
proposed withui the parking exp ansion area. Trees must be provided wherever possible within the
existulg parking area. The type of tree chosen should provide a canopyeffect over the parking area.
Screening Of Service Facilities.
Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service
facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public
street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be
screened from view by placement ot-a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight
feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area;
An electrical transformer near the northwest corner of the building and an electrical box attached to the
southwest corner of the building are screened with landscapui as shown on the site plan. The
transformer and electrical box are shown on the plans, but not�abeled. The applicant states m the
narrative that gas meters will also be screened, but the meter is not shown on the plans. In addition the
applicant states that rooftop units are small and far enough from the parapet edge that they will not be
v�sible f rom a public street a parkuig area, any public f acility or any residential area but no detail was given
showing location or size of the uruts. Th�s standard can be met condrtionally.
Screenin� Of Refuse Containers.
Except tor one- and two-fainily dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which
would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public
facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid
wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened
area.
An enclosed refuse collection area is proposed on the north side of the building. It will be screened bythe new
addition for the scene shop to the west. A masonrywall and gate are also proposed. Plan A1.03 shows a detail
of the enclosure.
FINDING: The Landscaping and Screening standards can be met as conditioned below.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 16 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TF�E HEARINGS OFFIC�R
CONDITIONS:
. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Plaiuung Division for
review and approval that shows the following pnor to site pernlit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio o} at least 1 for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
G The proposed buffer nuuung along the northern property, except where the
ex�sting parku�g area prohibits installation.
D. Locauon of and screerung for the proposed gas meter.
. Prior to building pern�it,issuance the applicant shall submit plans that indicate the
location of all rooftop eqiupment.
MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE - CHAPTER 18.755:
Chapter 18.755 req�uires that new construction incorporates nctional and adequate space for on-
site storage and efticient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to
pick-up and removal by haulers.
The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four(4) methods to demonstrate compliance:
Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler
Review and Sign-Of£ The applicant will havc to submit evidence or a plan, which indicates
compliance witli this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the ap plicant will have to
submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the tacility location and
compatibility.
The project meets the ininimum storage requirements, but one of the location standards cannot be met.
Therefore, the ap licant is choosing the Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off inethod of compliance.
A building of 13,�00 must provide 62.8 square feet of storage space. The proposed e�erior storage area �s
112.5 sguare feet. Pride Disposal requu-es a commercial sized recycling contauier. This size container
cannot be co-located with the large soLd waste contau7er as required by the Tigard Develop ment Code.
The proposed storage area cannot accommodate both. Expandui the storage area would reduce the
usable square footage of the project and adversely impact the sidewa� on the north side of the building.
Working with Pnde Disposal the applicant has agreed to uldoor storage and removal of the source-
separated recyclables. A copy of the Pride D�sposal Service Provider Letter was not provided, so the
applicant �s bemg conditioned to provide one.
FINDING: No service provider letter was submitted with the application.
CONDITTON: Prior to site perniit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise
waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets
their requirements.
Location Standards.
To encourage its use, the stora�e area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with
the stora�e area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply
with Uni orm Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can l�e
satisfied with a single Iocation or multiple Iocations, and can combine both interior and exterior
locations; Exterior stora e areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas.
Exterior storage areas s�all not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard
adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible
locations on a s�te to enhance security for users; Extenor storag�e areas can be located in a parking
area, if the proposed use provides at least the miniinum number of parking spaces required for
the use after deductin� the area used for stora�e. Storage areas shaIl be approp riately screened
according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible
for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle
traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 17 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO Tf-�E HEARINGS OFFICER
As discussed above the recyclables cannot be located within the outdoor, solid waste storage areas. Pride
Disposal has approved the plan as noted within the applicant's narrative. The e�erior storage area is
located wrthin an uitenor side yard and is visible from the parking area and loadin�dock, but the container
is screened from view. When collecuon trucks are present the 24-foot drive aisle will provide adequate
room for other vehicles to pass. There is a sidewaIk along the north side of the building, but it is not
obstructed by the storage area.
Design Standards.
The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with curnent
methods of local collection; Stora e containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be
made and covered with waterproo�materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas
shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. C�ate
openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings tor haulers
sFiall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and o�en
position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of matenals
accepted.
The exterior storage area and enclosure have been approved by Pride Disposal. A proposed masonry wall
(6-8 feet tall) and a 6-foot high gate will enclose the area. The approved gate operung will be 6:8 feet wide
and is constrained by the need to maultaui an adequate sidewalk width between the build�ng and the
parking area to the north. The gate can be secured in a closed and open position.
FINDING: T�ie Mixea S�licl Waste and Recyc:lable Storage standards can be met as conditioned above.
OFF-STREET PARHING AND LOADING(18J651
At the time o the erection o a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking
will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070.
The subject site is located within the Metro Zone A. The maxunum number of parking spaces that can be
provided by the site is 1.0 space for eve�ry 2.5 seats. With 236 seats the maximum number of parking
spaces for the use would be 95 spaces: The mulunum arking standards are as follows: The muumum
amount of parking re9uired for the fac�ty is the same 1.� space for every 3 seats. As such, the mulunum
parking requirement t-or the development �s 79 parking spaces. The site plan shows 93 parking spaces,
wluch meets both the i7unimum and maximum requu-ements. Two accessible parking spaces are provided,
but four are required. The applicant is conditioned to revise the site plan to accommodate two more
accessible spaces.
FINDING: The niunber of accessible parking spaces proposed does not meet the minunum
required.
CONDITION: Prior to issuance of site pernlits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing
four accessible parking spaces as requu-ed by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty
Code.
With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking:
Access drives frorn the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and
constructed to facilitate the flow of traftic and provide maximum safety for pedestnan and
vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the
requirements of Chapter, 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation;
As discussed earlier in this report,this criterion is satisfied.
Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences,
walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives;
The development plans show access drives defined by concrete curbing. One-way traffic flow is
permanently marked by directional arrow stnpuzg. This cnterion�s satisfied.
Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual
Clearance;
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 18 OF 30
12/10/07 PLJBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TT�HEARINGS OFFI�R
'The applicant states that the vision clearance standards are met, but the proposed site plan does not show
the v�sion clearance areas. A condition under the Visual Clearance section of tlus report will ensure the
standards are met.
Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface;
The applicant has proposed to pave the access and all parking areas. This criterion is satisfied.
Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P,
groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service dnve so that no backing
inovements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required.
The project is serviced by a one-way access around the building; therefore no backing movement will be
requu-ed within a public nght-of-way. This criterion is satisfied.
Loading/unloading driveways:
A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loadin
and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place whic�
is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time.
As stated above the one.way access drive wraps around the buildin to the lobby entrance on the south
side. The drive aisle is wide enough for two-waytraffic; therefore ve�cles can still maneuver around those
loading/unloading passengers.
Parking Lot Stripin�:
Except for singIe-tamily and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to rneet the off-
street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly
marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shaIl be clearly marked and signed to show
direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety.
The applicant has indicated that the parking lot will be striped and has proposed pennanent markings to
show traffic flow for the one-way access drive. This critenon�s satisfied.
Wheel Stops:
I'arkin�spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or
sidewa s shall be p�rovided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from
the front of the parkin� stall. The front tlu�ee feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low
lying landscape matenal that does not exceed the heig-ht of the wheel stop. This area cannot be
calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements.
Concrete curbing exists or is proposed around the perimeter of the parking area. Because the n-uniinum
landscape percentage is exceeded, car overhangs are allowed. This standard has been met because no wheel
stops are requu-ed.
�Space and Aisle Dimensions:
Table 18.765.1. outlines the minitnum dimensions for angled parking.
The site lan shows a total of 93 new s aces utilizing 90-de ree parking. Staff review of the arking lan
illustrate scompliance with the requirements of 18.765.N. �e aisle width between stall lanes for 90-degpr_e�e
angle parking �s at least 24 feet. This �s the nunimum aisle width required for two-way traffic. This
crnenon �s sat�sfied.
Minimum Bicycle Parking Re9uirements:
The total number of required 6icycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in
Section 18.765.070.H.
The bic}�le parking requirement is 1.0 space for every 10 seats;therefore the required number of spaces is 24.
The app licant has proposed to supply two bike racks near the main entry�nth space for 15 bic�ycIes on each
rack 5pace between the wall and the rack�s 5 feet which meets the access aisle re quirements. The racks will
be securely anchored to a concrete plaza area. This location does not impede on-site pedestrian or vehicular
traf f ic.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 19 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORTTO'IHE HEARINGS OFFICER
FINDING: The applicant has discussed a bicycle-Parking scheme for the proposal; however, no
detail of the spec�fic design was provided.
CONDITTON: Prior to the issuance of building �ernuts the applicant shall provide a bike rack
detail for the Planning Division review anc� approval.
Off-street loading requirements:
Off-street loadin�spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be
built or altered w ich receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and
maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows:
. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or
more;
. A minimtun of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more.
Off-street loading dimensions:
. Each loading beith shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location;
. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the
site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of
the longest vehicle using the facility srte;
. Entrances and e�rits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City
Engineer in accordance with Chap ter 18.710;
. Screenin� for off-street loading tacilities is required and shall be the same as screening for
parking rots in accordance with Chapter 18.745.
The building after additions will be 13,600 square feet. One off-street loading space is required. This
space is proposed along the north side of the building near the scene shop and trash collection area. This
standard has been met.
FINDING: The Off-street Parking and Loading requirements can be met as conditioned above.
SIGNS (18.780�:
Requires that a permit be issued for any sign that is erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally
altered, or relocated within the City Limits.
Signs are noted on the site plan and elevations but the narrative states that sign pernuts will be obtained
through a separate application. No drawuigs o�the future signage were submitted. A separate sign pernut
application will be necessary.
CONDITION: Prior to placement of any signs on site, the applicant shall apply for a sign�pernzit
and supply staff with the appropriate plans to venfy compliance with TDC Cliapter
18.780.
TREE REMOVAL - CHAPTER 18.790:
Section 18.790.030 reyuires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and pr�otection of trees
prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. TThe tree plan shall
incIude identification of all existing trees, Identification of a pro ram to save existing trees or
mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of w�ich trees are proposed to be
removed, and a protection �rogram defining standards and methods that will be used by the
applicant to protect trees dunng and after construction.
As required for panitions, the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Randy Killen, a certified
arborist. However, the report does not contain the four required components and is therefore not
acceptable (See the discussion below for details).
Plan requirements.
The tree plan shall include the following:
Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 20 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORT TO'I'HE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
The Arborist Report identified the location, size and species of all e�sting trees, consistent with this
standard.
Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
cali�per. Mitigation must follow the replacement �uidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance
with the followin standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for lan�scaping, streets and parking lots:
a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation
program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees;
b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-
thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50
percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
d. Retention of 75°/o or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation.
There are seven trees on-site greater than 12 inch caliper. One of these �tree # 10018 is hazardous. The
applicant is proposing to retaui five out of the six viable trees over 12' D.B.H. � represents 83%
retention of trees over 12". Therefore no mitigation and or cash assurance is required.
Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
Trees 10022 and 10023 are listed as retained on the grading plan and removed on the tree plan. The
pro�ect arborist noted that it may be possible to retain these trees �f proper precautions are taken. The
app�cant must make a final deternzination as to the status of these trees, keeping ui muld that protection is
preferred over removal wherever possible. If the trees are to be protected,then the applicant shall uidicate
protection methods on the construction plans.
A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
The tree protection plan does not show tree rotection fencing for all of the trees to be retained.
Specifically, trees 1OQ00, 10002, 10003, 10004, �0005, and 10006 do not have protection. Protection
measures must be shown for these trees. Trees that are a significant distance from construction activities
may be protected with plastic fencing instead of chain link.
All trees to be preserved that will he in close proximiry to constniction activities shall be protected with
five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Please have the applicant demonstrate which trees will be
protected with plastic and which will be protected with chain link Fences are to be mounted on two inch
diameter ga_lvaruzed iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot
spacing. The applicant shall p�osition fencing as d�rected by the project arborist to protect the trees to be
retained. The applicant sha11 allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring and
inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are perEornzing adequately.
Falure to follow the plan, or maintaui tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds
for unmediate suspension of work on the site unt�l remediation measures and/or civil citations can be
processed.
Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 15% of
its root system disturbed by construction must be shown on the plans,and adequately protected.
Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may
thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan in accordance with Section
18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and s�all not be subject to removal
under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a
condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such
tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The
deed restnction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance
with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed
restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 21 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO T�IE HEARINGS OFFI�R
A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above the Tree Removal standards will be met, if the applicant
complies with the conditions �sted below:
CONDITIONS:
♦ Prior to commencin site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Plaruiing and�ngineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street
trees and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibitin� equipment, vehicles, machinery� grading, dumping,
storage, 6uria1 of debris, or any other construction-re ated activiues u1 any
tree protection zone; and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree
Removal plan are authonzed for removal by this report. Notwithstanduig
an other provision of this title an arty found to be in violation of tlus
ch pter [18 790] pursuant to ClzapteP 1.16 of the Ti�ard Municipal Code
sliaIl be subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be requu-ed to
remedy any dama e caused by the violation. Such remediation shall
include, but not be�ted to,the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfullv
removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18J90.060 (D) of
the Tigard Development Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil
penalry representuig the estimated value ot any unlawfully removed or
damaged tree, as determined usulg the most current International Society
of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appra�sal.
• Prior to commencing site worl� the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by
the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for
an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring
the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are perforn�ung
adequately.
• The applicant shall have an on-going responsibiliry to ensure that the Project
Arbonst has submitted wntten reports to the Cary Arborist, at least once every two
weeks, as the Project Arborist morutors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation throu h the building construction
phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition and�ocation of the tree protecuon
tencing, deterrrurie �f any chan�es occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree
Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City
Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if rt appears the TI'Z's or the Tree
Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the
City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City
Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to �ssuance of any Cert�ficates of
Occupancy the Pro�ect Arbonst will submit a final certification indicatulg the
elements o�the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remau�ung trees on
the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing environment.
• If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist
shall�repare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and
the ely unpacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree �rotection zone.
The Ciry Arborist may requu-e changes pn� or to approval. The pro�ect arbonst shall
be on site wlule work �s occurruig anthin the tree protection zone and submit a
sununary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not
signif icantly unpact the health and/or stability of the trees.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVA7TON(CC1P2007-00002) PAGE 22 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORTTO'IHE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
• Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were preserved,the location of tree protection fencing.
B. Subrrut a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist
regarding building and infrastructure situ-ig techniques to be employed in
construction with respect to any protected trees on site.
♦ Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the
effect that any existuig tree greater than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if
the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certif ied arborist. The deed restriction
may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with
this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS - CHAPTER 18J95:
Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions o this chapter shall apply to all development
including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a
change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the
access requirements.
Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hed�e, planting,
fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasiona utility poIe
or tree) exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb
exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in
this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed.
The applicant addresses vision clearance within the narrative, but the proposed site plan does not show vision
clearance tnangles for the two access drives. T�vs critenon�s not satistied.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the vision clearance standards have not been met.
CONDITTON: Prior to issuance of site permits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS CHAPTER- 18.810:
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards or the implementation o public and private facilities
and utilities such as streets,sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width�planned as a portion of
an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires an arterial street to have a
64 to 128-foot right-of-way width and varied paved section. Other improvements rec�uired rnay
include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground ut�lit�es, street light�ng, storm
drainage,and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW Grant Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the Ciry of
Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 47 feet of ROW radius for the cul-de-
sac bulb, according to the most recent tax assessor's map.
SW Grant Avenue is currently improved to a 40 foot paved radius. No additional improvements are
required along the Grant Avenue frontage v�nth this development.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 23 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORT TO'IHE HEARINGS OFFICER
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a 54
foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improveinents required may include on-
street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and
street trees.
This site lies adJ'acent to SW School Street, which is classified as a local street on the Ciry of Tigard
Transportation Plan Map. At present, there �s appro�mately 10 feet of ROW from centerline, according
to the most recent taY assessor's ma . The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27
feet from centerline plus additional�OW at the SE ternunus to provide an offset cul-de-sac bulb. In past
discussions it was thoug�ht that the School had dedicated the entire 20 feet of existing ROW, however, the
City Surve �r did additional research. This research indicates that the School only dedicated 10 feet of
ROW an�the adjacent property owners dedicated the remaining 10 feet of ROW. Based on this
information the School needs to dedicate 17 feet of ROW not 7 feet as originally thought. City
Engineerin staff is only requiring the 7 feet of dedication at tliis time and will provide the layout of the
requ�red R�W dedication for the ponion of cul-de-sac bulb that impacts this development. The applicant
shall then prepare a legal descnption and e�ibit for recordation with Washington County LUT.
SW School Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the im�Qact from this development,
the applicant should enter u-ito a future street unprovement agreement. The applicant can decide to
dedicate the additional 10 feet of right-of-way with the 7-foot dedication or may uiclude it within the
f uture street improvement agreement.
Street Aligrunent and Connections:
Section 1$.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet
between connections is required except where prevented by barners such as topography, railroads,
freeways, �re-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions
existing pnor to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be
exempted due to a regulated water teature if regulations would not permit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a
development site shall be extended within the site toprovide through ci�ulation when not precluded
by environmental or topo raphical constraints, e�ust�ng development patterns or strict adherence to
other standards in this co�e. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to
redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide re uired e�ensions. Land is considered
topograplucally constrained if the slope is greater than 15%�or a distance of 250 feet or more. In the
case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient
to show that a street coruiect�on �s not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint
precludes some reasonable street connect�on.
Grant Avenue serves the school site from two directions, but does not connect. It is not expected to
connect in the near future due to the e�sting development pattern.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the len th, width and shape of blocks shall be
designed with due re ard to providing adequate bu�ding sites for the use contem�plated
consideration of needs �or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traific anc�
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not
exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water
or, pre-eXistin� development or,
• For blocks ad�acent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provrdes equivalent access.
No new blocks or streets are being proposed with this development. An adjustment to the block len�th
standards was approved for the site during a previous Conditional Use review (CLTP2003-
00002/VAR2003-00011). The main reason cited for the adjustment was safety concerns on providing a
vehicular connection through a school site.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVA7TON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 24 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICEA
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the
average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable
zomng distric�
The parcel is pre-e�sting, and the applicant is not proposing to create any new parcels. This standard is
satistied,
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or
private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c apphes, which
requires a pa�el to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded
access easement In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage
shall be at least 15 feet
The parcel is pre-existing and has approximately 375 feet of frontage along the Grant Avenue roundabout
and 500 feet along School Street. No numbers were provided by the appl�cant, and are therefore based
upon measurements taken from the City's GIS mappulg system.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
There are e�sting sidewalks along SW Grant Avenue that will remain. There are no sidewalks along the
SW School Street frontage. The applicant �s re guired to enter into a future street improvement agreement
that will include the construction of sidewalks,thereby meeting this cntenon.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new
development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions
set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and
the adopted policies of the cornprehensive plan.
Over-sizing:
Section 18.$10.090.0 states that proposed sewer s ystems shall include consideration of additional
developmcnt within the area as pro�ected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant states the existing sanitary sewer lateral will be used for this project.
Storm Draina�e:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be lar�e enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Desi n and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by �ean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage:
Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional
runoff resulting from the development will overload an existin� drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development unti provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or untiI provisions have been made for storage of
additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in
2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 25 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORT TO T'�IE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
In 1997, C1ean Water Services (CWS) coinpleted a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impe�rvious area reduction pro�gram resulting in no
net increase ui storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. TI'he City will re uu-e that al[ new developments
resulting in an increase of unp ervious surf aces provide onsite detention f ac�ties, unless the development�s
located adjacent to Fanno C:reek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water
runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
The applicant proposes to construct a water quality/detention pond on site. This e�tended dry detention
pond will detain most of the runoff from the newlycreated unpervious surface area.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above �round, temporary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the
under�round services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, includin sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by
the developer, shall be constructe�prior to the surfacing of the streets• and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid c�isturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UI'ILITY
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water S stem:
The City o Tigard provides service in this area. There is a public water line in SW Grant Avenue. The
applicant will utilize the e�stuig water line that connects to the public main and install a new 1 inch meter.
Storm Water Qualit�
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS� Design and Construction Standards �adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facilitythat will
meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall subrrut a maintenance plan
for the f acility that must be reviewed and approved by the City pnor to construction.
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall
employ the design enguieer responsible for the design and spec�fications of the private water quality fac�ty
to pertorm construction and v�sual observation of the water qualiry facility for compliance wrth the design
and specifications. These inspections shall be made at sigruficant stages throughout the project and at
completion of the construction. Pnor to final building uisp ection, the design enguzeer shall provide the
City of Tigard (Inspection Superv�sor) with wrmen cont-irmation that the water quality facility is in
compliance anth the design and specifications.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of
sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which acceIerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is rec�uired to submit an erosion control plan for City
review and approval pnor to issuance of City permits.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 26 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
The Federal Clean Water Act reyuires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre
of land. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit.
11ie applicant shall submit an application for an NPDES 1200C Permit to the City of Tigard with their
PFI Pernut application.
D. IMPACT STUDY(18.3901:
Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states t�at the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the
effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of
impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected
private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall eid�er specificaIly concur with a requirement for �ublic right-of-way
dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. The
report substantiates that all services are capable of serving the site.
The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. The repo� rt
substantiates that all services are capable of serving the site. Storm water collected from the new parking
areas will be collected and directed to the detention pond. All stormwater will be directed to the ewstLng
storm manhole in SW Grant Avenue. Sanitary will connect to an e�sting 8-inch pipe in Grant Avenue,
testing will be performed to ensure improvements are not necessary. Water will be provided by utilizing
an existing water line and installing a new 1-Lnch meter. This project will not add demand on public parks
in the area. Spec�fic information was not given on additional traffic generation. Based on the 93 park�ng
spaces, there could be an additional 186 tri s duruig the� performance. For the 6 office emplo es an
additional 12 trips is estimated during the business day. The bulk of these trips will not be during peak
hours or school hours since the performances are in the everung or weekend days.
ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following
criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:"
Section 18.390.040 states that the app licant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of
development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact,
the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the
impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall either specificaIly concur with a requirement for �ublic right-of-way
dedication, or provide evidence that suppoits that the real property dedication is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a
condition of approval requires the ti�nsfer to the public of an interest in real property, die
approval authonty shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real
property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will
have on the public.
The applicant has provided an impact stu�dy addressing� the project's impacts on public systems. The
Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TTF) is a mitigation measure that is requu-ed at the time of
development. Based on a transportation unpact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy
Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 TTF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of
new development on the Collector anc� Arterial Street system. Based on the use and the number of new
parking spaces proposed, the applicant is required to pay TIF's of approxunately $4,389.00 Final TTF
payment will be assessed at time of bu�lduzg pernut subrruttal.
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 27 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TI-�HEARINGS OFFIC�A
Based on the estimate that total TTF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on maJ�or street imp rovements
ci 'de, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this �ro�ects traffic unpact �s $13,716 ($4,389 divided by
.3�The difference between the TIF paid, and the ull impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on
the street system. The unmitigated impact is only on the arterial and collector system and does not u�clude
unpact cost on the local system (School Street) wluch�s approximately$52,500. Therefore the uninitigated
unpact�s $8,877 ($13,716 - $4,839).
Besides the TIF that mitigates for 32% of the projects imp act on the trans ortation system, the applicant
is required to dedicate additional right-of-way along SW School Street C7 �eet x 500 feet = 8,500 square
feet). The estunated value of the dedication �s fifteen dollars a square foot for a total value of $52,500.
The applicant has proposed a 7-foot dedication. Staff is not requiring the 17-foot dedication previously
addressed under the Streets section of the report.
FINDING: There is $8,877 of unmitigated impact from the proposed development.
SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division was sent a copy of the proposal. Comments were received about
compliance of the private storm, sewer and water services. These will be reviewed by the Building
Division pnor to site perrrut issuance.
The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have
been uzcorporated mto tFus report.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has no objections.
The City of Tigard Public Works Department recommended catch basins in some locations where the
�a plicant had proposed storm line clean-outs. The 6-inch clean-outs are a poor design for a 10-inch line.
uestions also arose as to whether the detention pond would remain pnvate and �f the building is to be
s� pnnkled. If the building will have fire sprinklers, fhen the proposed water meter will not be large enough.
These issues will be reviewed again dunng the permitting process for on-site utilities and connections to
the public lines.
SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Tri-met was sent a copy of the proposal. Unofficial comments received requested an accessible route
from Pacific Highway on the site. After a recent lot line adjustment this development site no longer fronts
Pacific Highway. No formal comments were received.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has reviewed the proposal and offered the following
comments:
Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of
approval:
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic ire spruikler
sys tem, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official.
(IFC 503.1.1)
�) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire
apparattu access roads shall have an unobstructed width o not less than 20 eet�12 eet or up to two
dwellu�g uruts and accessory buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance o not less than 13 feet
6 inches. Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 26 feet wide, "NO Pf1RKING" signs shall be
installed on both sides ot the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire ap paratus roadways
are more than 26 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one
side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or
more,parking is not restncted. (IFC 503.2.1)
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATION(CCJP2007-00002) PAGE 28 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R
The fire district does not endorse the design concept wherein twenty feet of unobstructed
roadway width is not provided.
2) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate
parked vehicles and 20 eet of unobstructed dnving�surface, "No Parking" sig ns shall be installed on
one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Roads 26 teet wide or less shall be
posted on both sides as a fire lane. Roads more than 26 feet wide to 32 feet wide shall be posted on
one side as a fire lane. Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" and shall be instaIled with a
clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have
red letters on a white reflective background. (IFC D103.6)
s) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather
su ace that is easily istinguishable rom the surrounduig area and is cap able of supporting not less
than 12,500 pounds point Ioad (wheel load) and 60,000 pounds live load (gross vchic�lc weight�. You
may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of
supporting such loading. (IFC D 102.1)
4) C�MMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The rec�uired fire flow for the
building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons Per minute (CJI'1V� or t e available CTI M in the water delivery
system at 20 psi, whichever �s less as calculated usuig IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating
the required tu-e f low is available f rom the Fire Marshal's Of f ice. (IFC B 105.2)
Fire flow demand calculations must be submitted to and approved by this office prior to our
endorsement for the issuance of a site development permit.
5) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The iYUnunum ntui�ber and distribution of
ire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C,Table C 105.1.
Considerations for�lacing fire hydrants may be as follows:
• E�sting hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hyd rants as
approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point ot a subject
bu�lding that is protected with fu-e sprinklers may contribute to the requu-ed number of
hydrants.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute
to the required number of hydrants unless approvedbythe fire code official.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided hig hways or freeways shall
not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heav�ly traveled collector streets only
as approved bythe fire code official.
• Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the
requu-ed number of hycirants only�f approved bythe fire code official.
6) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the
installation o re lective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the
side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no
center line,then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (IFC 508.5.4)
�) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located
wit ' 100 eet o a ire department connection (FD . Fire h rants and FDC's shall be located on
the same side of the fire ap�paratus access roadway. FDC's s all normally be remote except when
approved bythe fire code official. (IFC912.2)
s) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUC'I"ION:
Approved ire apparatus access roadwa}� and ire ighting water supplies sha be installed and
operational pnor to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC
1410.1 & 1�12.1)
s) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for access is required for this buildin . Please contact the Fire Marshal's
ice or an order form and instructions regarding u-istallation an�placement. (IFC 506)
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATTON(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 29 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLICHEARING STAFF REPORTTO'IT-�HEARINGS OFFIC�R
Clean Water Setvices has reviewed the proposal. Comments have been incorporated into this report and
conditions.
Portland General Electric, Northwest Natural Cras Company, Comcast Cable, Verizon and Qwest
Communications were given the opportuniry to review this proposal and submitted no comments or
objections.
'' C�. G'�.c��
November 30,2007
PREPARED Y: Cheryi Caines DATE
Associate Planner
. `
r!� I
� ' � November 30, 2007
APPROVED BY: Richar ewers o � DATE
Planning Manager
BROADWAY ROSE RENOVATIOI�T(CUP2007-00002) PAGE 30 OF 30
12/10/07 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO'1��HEARINGS OFFICER
- - ---
,,. ������ � �c� �ov
°u��6` �Q�' 'I § � g � �� O �
��o��� ���l�� �50�1 , �"Ma�0�1� �NI � ����� � d ��� �� �%,, �-�� a �
� f 9 �� � e �6 ; � �y ! — F Yy"� i �4 3�� �@ � F� q � � !e `' 1( 1 �e '� ege!
� � � � � � � � � � � � t� � � � � i� i� �p Ej d+��e �' E� ���s����� ���e � ��� 9 �9�!
e e .� S! y � � �P � i a �e � ! � yy �� ( � �99e ! i F pi$�is� F+���� s e 4E �i !P]. #����Y ���i
�� �� � ' � � � ri 3 ! Fy � I� S 4 P 4 �J�6� � � i � � 1 6�e� a �� e � e� �{��� 'QQs!��b``�@�� � ��� � 1 e� ��-
�3 e : y � � �,� . � . .n$ d Q � � ° � � �� ' ��'����a �� � Ee� 's��� SF� dip+� aR.� ' .�� ���ES'�p ��ss
. �� It 9 i� 9 e Q � ¢ 4e � � � � � � � i���� �� ��� Ep ��� E � �. �I�Y'f���z� e � n� 1�65��,
3 i � ! ! C� �' �� � � a ���� � ! � � 6si + � Q � e�o� � �t � ;9 0� � ��! q �� � � 6��' ti
i � � E � � �s ta � �� d +��� ��� , � � � '�ti 4t � � ! 3� ��� .9 = ���p{i p� �F# s��,i�� c 7 F� ;�j Q�P
F 1 a��e �}-FE � + 5a.}g p �� � e ��i�E ��ep��' S� °1l9��fgq ��� � � ! +Fesg e�! �.
e�411�� �f� 1 � 1 ! 1 i E I;i@1�1 { � 1 1�E -!F;'[�3% i���` I � �Fy �4[ #p��f�4��i;����i`�e5�(��9@����l�E�e a �p�{t
�-',��-C��li[�� a°���� !,I ! f � �f` � 1 1 �11 IF�I 7 i��.�{�6�R��e.�7. e 5 lf. . , a �. 3 d&:79�4
� OOOOOOOOGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC�
3 �;� '�� � �c` �'� �'"-�=----- ---� . t r
_ : � ~�
���i� ------- - - -- � °
�� Z
���'�lli � o ,�' � � � o ;
-.. . �� •,' ,
��- _ ,.�� � .� � � Y � i �
� ... , ��., � � ��� , , x+ ,4 t � ��
_ ` �� � t
j ,! � �.
.. . .. { .t, � � , . ..
�
�
. 't , . . 1 .��1�1
� .. .
b
4 � / ; � < A
�
�� , 'f 1 � .,�� . . � .i� .
4F�a � � ���4 ,, ,�� ��� � ,
l. l7 �_,,. e t ���.. � �.. . ,
� .
.. .... ' : i 7
� �, �, ' . .. .- ".1
t x � ,
, �
i ;�
'� � I �.� �.�� t '� '; i4 ',i ( _
� �r
I ) O 1 ��, '.l� •O � Qi• � ,O
� . �
�
. �
� � ' r k. F �
1�� '' ' I
� � 1 �
�'� � � � :
�� i . � . � Q . � �d
,1� 1 •�:� �� . � I � :i
i ' � � I �
��•�� 1 � ,,� I -.''S t
�1 � - _ �� .�� � �t''
F,� '
�. . },. �� f f
� . � ��\lY L_J.' � i �� �
1. ; ,.
� O � � � 'I o
, �
� ;�� � b�� � ' �
� r `,. � �
. � � � , " � ,i
� � �
� �
� M1
' !,ry
� f
. } . . � � ' t { 1
� ` ' . � . " �� `i 0
� ` .. . . . � ��...
� O `` I
.; ' � ��� �� � ��{� �
� �YM� • �,O 3, 1 . __- -'\ 1 0' ,:
,� l
� � �, � � �
�
1 p ����;� � --t}_
., 7 �.4.��
•O•�� d
� � � � �
� � / _ �
, � o �
' � �
:
� � � �
i �
t.� j w�
// � W
� .+1� . / \ � O ,
– i ---- `/- — --– - ---- -
�_ `� wq�� � �; � �, ---+�-� � ,��-�^�/�-----------`,�\,,'- � ----�
, ,, , / . • - .
� —1 �'�T-_,?�� , � ; / , o� y�
i� . '—� i ��; �j\�� :��1' / \ / � I I �E��can�nic irvror+mniitir+ s�srern
;� ' ' � / ; �.,°��. `�--� � � � VICINITY MAP
� ; �� �� � ,, o� e �
---�----� ' � �
�
; �___� �
�—'—� � i �___ �G =___________
; i i / \�,o`� CUP2007-00002
; �-� , ' � ,�.�� ____________ '
i-I � pP �,� , ��� BRDADWAY ROSE
i � I � � �� / ti�,� TI�ATRE
, P � CAFETERIA ,
,
RENOVATTON '�
;� � / ,
� �
I
�, s�.
�� �� g�� ',
�� � �� i
� � ���� , �, LEGEND: �
� ' suBJECr ;
`"ATK'�ys p` / SITE '
� � I
� ;
y� —- -� �
� 2G� .i ..,.«,..-�:1 j
;�w�" '`� i;' Y:�. �I�� I
G NT \ ��o,�= �Ta' < . .._e i i
DELL T � y � • � �� , i
y., �
— � K �' .- � I
`Z` � � �:ranqo�. � =
a :e E:;r:iT, �r,� i
� / � I ,
' i
� ��yF�:or.u. / ih���,a,; � Ka " �
/ i i
� --� /�._ �
� �L ViLJ
� Tigartl Area MaD I i
/,L -- N i
PARK ST � �
PARK ST o so iso z�o 3so aso Feei �
— — �
1"=366(eet I
�
W i
Q �
COOK LN ���G
Q� Inlormalion on this map is for general localion only and �
slauld be verified with It�e Developmenl Services Division. �
i Z \ ^ ,\ 13125 SW HaII Blvd
/�� \\ ^p��,p��� /� Tigard,OR 97223
Y — /`�< / '\ /', \ \ / \ (503)639-4171 (
I / �
T I ~ —_ _ � � _____.__ �/ ��'��_____/��. ..._ . ; 011p�//wa.v.ti_tigard.or.us i
:ommurnty Development Plot date Nov 6,2007;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,L_iNHOLDER,VENDOR OR S�.,�.ER
T��E TIGARD DEVELOPMENI'�DE REQUIIZES 7HATIF YOURECEIVE THIS NOTT�, ��
IT SHALL BE PRONII'TLY FORWARDED TO THE PURQ�SER �
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
NO7TC� IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT '1� TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEE7'ING ON MONDAY
DECEMBER 10, 2007 AT 7:00 PM, IN Tf� TOWN HALL OF 'IT� TTGARD QVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW
HALL BOULE`'ARD,7TGARD,OREGOI�T 97223 ��'ILL CONSIDER T�-�E FOLLO��/ING ?�PPLICATION:
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
FILE TITLE: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
APPLICANT: BroadwayRose Theatre Co. APPLICANT'S Shiels, Obletz, &Johnsen
PO Box 231004 REP.: Attn: Francesca Gambetti
Tigard,OR 97281 1140 SW 11`'' Avenue, Suite 500
Portland, OR 97205
OWNER Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
6960 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard, OR 97223
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at
C.F. Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work
includes a 2,600 square foot addition. The renovated building will be used as theatre space
and admuiistrative of f ices f or the Broadway Rose Theatre.
LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S102C�, Tax Lot
100 and 2S102BC,Tax Lot 8700.
ZONE: R 12: Medium Densiry Residential District. The R 12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a rniniinum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide
range of civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Communiry Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725,
18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TI--IIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUC7'ED IN ACCORDANC� WITH Tf� RULES OF
C.�-�AI'TER 18390 OF THE COMMU1vITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROC�DURES ADOPTED BY
'I��E TIGARD QTY COUNQL AND AVAILABLE AT QTY I-IALL.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVIC�S ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH INIl'AIRED HEARING. Tf--�E QTY WILL
ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED
BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQLJEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOIC�:) OR (503) 6842772
(TDD- TELEGOMMLINICATIONS DEVIC�S FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS'THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING
TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON T�IIS PROPOSED ACITON MAY DO SO IN WRITING
PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC I-�ARING. ORAL TESTTMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AT T'f-� PUBLIC HEARING,Tf-� HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL REC�IVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATTON FROM
Tf-� QTY PLANNER,OPEN'THE PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TES7TMONY. THE
HEARINGS OFFIC�R MAY CONTTNLJE TI� PLJBL.IC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETTNG TO OBTAIN
ADDITTONAL INFORMATTON OR Q.OSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACITON ON THE APPLICATTON.
IF A PERSON SUBNIITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO 'I'HE APPLICAT'ION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO
THE PUBLIC HEARING,ANY PAR'TY IS ENTTTLED TO REQLJEST A CONITNUANC� OF'IHE HEARING. IF'I'I�RE
IS NO GON7'INUANC� GRANI'ED AT TI-� HEARING,ANY PARTIQPANf IN'I'F-� HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT
T�-�E RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT TI-�
RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT Tf-�FIRST EVIDEN7TARY HEARING(ORS 197J63(6).
INQ.UDED IN Tf-IIS NOTIC� IS A LIST OF APPROVAL C�ITERIA APPLICABLE TO T'HE REQLJEST FROM TI-�
TIGARD GOMMUI�TIIY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND Tf-�E T'IGARD GOMI'REHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL BE BASED UPON TI-�SE C�ZITERIA AND
TI-�ESE QZITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMI'ORTANT THAT GOMIvIENI'S RELATTNG TO THE REQUEST
PERTAIN SPEQFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE QtITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO `IT� Q.OSE OF 'IT�
HEARING ON "IT-� REQUEST ACCOMI'A1�1IED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENC� SUFFIQENT TO ALLOW 'I'HE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PREQUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND
USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE.
ALL DOCCJMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN T'I-� ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON
AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE C�,NTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR Tf-� CCIRRENT
RATE C�-�RGED FOR COPIES AT THE T'IME OF Tf-� REQLJEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE
HEARING,A COPY OF TF--�E STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECI'ION AT NO QOST,OR A COPY CAN
BE OBTAINED FOR 7WENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR'THE C(.JRRENT RATE C�-IF�RGED FOR COPIES AT
THE TTME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FURTI-�R INFORMA7TON PLEASE CONTACT TI-�E STAFF PLANNER CHERYL CAINES AT 503.639.4171,
TTGARD QT'Y HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO
cherylcCc�tigard-or.gov.
--- -- --
- —•- _ , -
--- w -c--- ,�,. � ;: -,--�._ � , �——,—
.____ •�_ ,sr ` •,m �. \ .�� •�/�, ��- �� ,, �! . .
--��� ����� ' ,�. .-a� `."� �\\. ���` VICINITY MAP
--�--� � ' r:\'� �°T�'�`�,�0 i �\� — \�' �� , ,' �,,
_—_ \�� �[.\�� ����!`��/ ( �_\� '��'� \\� ___ ___— ___
----=—. i"�' %�y's��,a ',�% �'`� " �,;�� � c�miooi-0000z__
_ j ��/�"��� y'��ApT>�����i, BROADWAY ROSE
/� ,�i�•� ``� P� . /� , � � �/,'�j"' ''F ^ /CAFETERIA
�, �,,�j� � ��,, � ��,� RENOVATTON �
- v�_��� � ���� �' : i �\ i
�� � \ �.
/ � �' �i;i%" , '�/\., Sr /`� \,�
� ' '
�ji/%% Q� � � \ LEc�F'vl)
�''�' '' ,� � �,i ��%/�i„!; `�j � � �%i%'/"�� sL�s�.cr
1�KINg- ' %%��///// . �/j;� 51�
�i�—, J
\ � � ,///� �//� � '.�Y\ . //!l/ �'!lG
g�—'�-( /'-"'� � � ����ji i �\ � ��y --- - �— -
- � � � �� ��� %�%/,,. ��� v � �
� � � � %/.��, � � � � ��
—�� ,;,, � � ���,, � �
_ r�LL CT � ' � `� '!� \\ i ' i
I � ..._'� . � � \ \ ' .�� �_ i , -
. : � �.r � .c� �I 7 r_/
: .� ^�-� --R` ��,� �,r�*.w.....r
�� , ,I�� ,, .
PARK � �— /� (/ N
_ ..-�_� PARK ST �i Y��`.` .�'•� / nc r
� V r
� �� . /� / ✓ � � '� Y .
' � !>r_. ' ' V / .��� �.��/ .-.
_Sc44K L_N 4 ,� G/ // ����f�' .�
_ — 5��.; / j ��� � .
__ � • �Q�� � �� `l � � � ,��'j.....e �°o..°���o;:�
_�_, � /J �..�.«n�n
.__"___ .Y' �\: ./ �� /�j �//,�� T9N 011 irl3>
—� . ,� � ISW1NMit�
�,
—r__
...c.'__.—G_�—L_.1. : : �+mu.»aw.d.d.N
Cammunity Devebpmenl— ---'—`._' `/''___ __._
Plol EYIe:Nov6,2W7;Q1m�piclMAGIC03.APR
RE QUE ST FOR COMME NTS ''
DATE: November 6,2007
TO: Mark Vandomelen, Plans Examination Supervisor
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(x2437�
Phonc: (503) 639-4171 FaY: (503) 684-7297 Email: chc�}'1c@ti�,�arci-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
- BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at C.F. Tigard
Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition.
The renovated building will be used as theatre space and adininistrative offices for the Broadway Rose Theatre.
LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County TaY Assessor's Map No. 2S102C�, TaY Lot 100 and
2S102BC, T� Lot 8700. ZONE: R 12: Medium Density Residential District. The R 12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a muiunum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and
institutional uses are also pernzitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vcinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied byvarious
departments and agencies and from other infoxmation available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to coi7unent on this app lication, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 20. 2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your
comments. If �ou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your cominenrs and
confirm}�ur comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Plaruung Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,Ti�ard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECKTHE FOLLOWINGITEMSTHATAPPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
�r-��a�-e ,��-�o✓r-- �,r�-i ,��„� Q_ 51�. � 1 C�� �..,,�t,� . (,J',`i l, G�,�-�-c� l 1 �S PS G
Pf� Jw�"Z . G,..� �"�h ��,...�t/ ��r-�-a I I�-��w✓� s��c: l � Co�rrA ��n (..>>tL. C�,a,���-C/ 7
OS PSC.
�f i ��.,-4-t (�.��.-4'c� s'e,i v,`�e, `� 1�.�. � � L a�ro 1..�. � � � C�,,u,,n-�-r./ � o S P�C.
�1�Q,A C`C. I �a A� Gl l.�a r-e ci r(,, ��-�'C i C-e.� ��t� Ot c�2 �w L c.i�.A� ��
C�,,.�,�.�„i l O O S PS C, �S�}�o•> l b 1�-1. o
IName &Number of Person(s) Commenting: �� ����, � �S ��� sU 3 .7 J �6 Z �3 3
RE QUE ST FOR COMME NTS "
DATE: November 6,2007 AECEIVED PLANN
ING
TO: Jim Wol£Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer
NOV 0 8 2007
FROM: City of T"igard Planning Division
CITY OF T�GARD
STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(x2437�.
Phone: (503) 639-4171 F�: (503) 684-7297 Email: cl�er;lc _ tigard-or.go��
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CLTI') 2007-00002
- BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at GF. Ti�ard
Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition.
The renovated building will be used as theatre space and adininistrative offices for the Broadway Rose Theatre.
LOCA?ION: 12850 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County Tu� Assessor's Map No. 2S102CB, Tax Lot 100 and
2S102BCy Tax Lot 8700. ZONE: R 12: Medium-Density Residenual District. The R 12 zoning district is designed t�
accommodate a full range of housing rypes at a muiunum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and
institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Commwuty Development
Code Chapters 18.330, 18360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan,V'icinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforn�ation supplied byvarious
departments and agencies and from other inforn�auon available to our staff, a report and reconunendauon will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to coinment on this application, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 20,2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to retum your
conunents. If �ou are unable to res�ond b�the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and
confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Plaruling Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECKTHE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
IName &Number of Pe�on(s) Commenting: �. O\f �, 15b�
, . ..
RE QUE ST FOR COMMENTS "
DA'I'E: November 6,2007
TO: PER ATTACHED
FROM: City of Tigard Plaiuiing Division
STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner(�437�
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Faa: (503) 684-7297 Email: cheiti°1cQtigar•d-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
- BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at GF. Tigard
Ele�nentary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition.
The renovated building will be used as theatre space and adininistrative offices for the Broadway Rose Theatre.
LOCATION: 12850 SW C�rant Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S102CB, Tax Lot 100 and
2S102BC, Tax Lot 8700. ZONE: R 12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R 12 zonin� district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A v�nde range of civic and
institutional uses are also pemzitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communiry Development
Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From informauon supplied byvarious
departments and agencies and from other inforn�ation available to our staff, a report and recoiYUnendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 20,2007. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to retum your
corrunenu. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your cornments and
confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any quesuons,contact the Tigard Plaruung Division, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
INaine &Number of Pe�on(s) Commenting:
_ . �'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR ''�MMENTS
NOTIFICA LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DE .1PMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: ao - a FILE NAME: ��'�� a- ���
CITY OfFICES
LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch,Planning Mgr. ✓CURRENT PLANNINGffodd PragedArborist �POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer
✓BUILDING DIVISION/Mark Vandomelen,Plans Ex.Supervisor✓ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Rev' Engineer HEARINGS OFFICER(+Z aets)
CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Ciry Recorder �PUBLIC WORKSlRob Murchison,Project Engineer PLANNING COMMISSION/GRETCHEN(�12 sets)
_COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs._PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Supervisor �/FILEIREFERENCE(+p sets)
_CODE ENFORCEMENT/Christine Damell,Code Compliance Specialist(DCA) � , � 1
��i '�� - �i /
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DIST.#✓TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE♦ _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT{► �CLEAN WATER SERVICES+ C�
Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Marvin Spiering/SWM Program
15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
Beaverton,OR 97005-1152
LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON� _ CITY OF TUALATIN � OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood�w�un Fo�R.q��.ee�
Steven Sparks,Dev 5vcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road 5alem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
17160 5W Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,DataResourceCenter(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP. Kathryn Harris�M.P:a cws�.n.,o��Y�
_ M@I Hlll@,GreenspacesCoordinator(CPA20A) M2f2 UII08(Comp.PlanAmendmeni58Measure37) Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growtt�ManagementServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 `
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(POwer�mes m nreal _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION 1�+o�oPo�s Toweral Dept.of Land Use 8 Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conway�c0��i,o�5.�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Planning Division�zcn�Ms ia
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Brent Curtis�can�
CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtiry�or wenanas ana aotennai Envrtonmentai impactsl Development Review Coordinator poria Mateja�zcn�Ms,a
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section�va�ro�s� _Sr.Cartographer�caNZC��MS,<
1900 SW 4`h Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims�SuNByM�2CA�M515
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037
OR.PARKS 8 REC.DEPT.
WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY �ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC
DaveAustin�wcccai�•e�r•�MO�o,��.,o.«„ SamHunaidi,nssistarnDistrictManager (NOtifyifODOTRfR-Hwy.CroasingisOnlyACCasatoLanE) PRESERVATIONOFFICE
PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,s�c�oss��9sareryso��a��s� (NOUfylfPropaRyHasMOOvatlay)
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13`"Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C
Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bur�ington NortherNSanta Fe R/R Predecessor)
Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager
1200 Howard Drive SE
Albany,OR 97322-3336 �
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �COMCAST CABLE CORP. ✓TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�,o�,�e.a�b�so�y� Gerald Backhaus,s��.,�o�,a����, (IlPrqectisWiMin'/.MAeolaTransitROUte1
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
PoRland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street �
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
�PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY ✓VERIZON (MC030533) �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ke+r6otieffe��vc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Brandon Kahler,Engineering Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr.
���' 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 20575 Vonnewmann Dr.,Suite 150 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
�,S1 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
`' . TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 �COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC.
Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Aiex Silantiev ,s��o�aaea��<�� Brian Every,�ea��a�+,
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue
Tigard.OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203
� INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANYIALL
CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicatiog Parties To Notifr�. h:\patty\masterslRequest For Comments Notitication List.doc (UPDATE�: 24-AUg-07)
(Also update:i:lcurpinlsetupUabelslannexationslannexalion_utilities and(ranchises.doc,mailing labels 8 aulo text when updaling this documer
M �
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cheryl Caines
FROM: Todd Prager, City Arborist
RE: Broadway Rose Theatre Cafeteria Renovation
DATE: November 8, 2007
As you requested I have provided comments on the "Broadway Rose Theatre Cafeteria
Renovation" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments
please contact me anytime.
18.745.030 Genera/Provisions
C, Installation Requirements._The insfallation of all landscaping shall be as
follows:
1. All landscaping shal!be installed according to accepted planting
procedures.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree
Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the
American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the
Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees
based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil
amendments and modifications.
2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and
grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock
(ANS!Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and
3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of
this title.
D. Certificate of Occupancv. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless
the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have
been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond.
The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This
represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate
and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code.
E. Protection of Existinq Landscapinq. Existing vegetation on a site shall be
protected as much as possible:
1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing
vegetation to remain during the construction process; and
2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g.,
areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which
can be placed around the individua! trees).
The tree protection plan does not show tree protection fencing for all of the trees to be
retained. Specifically, trees 10000, 10002, 10003, 10004, 10005, and 10006 do not
have protection. Please have the applicant show protection for these trees. Those
trees that are a significant distance from construction activities may be protected plastic
fencing instead of chain link.
All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be
protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Please have the applicant
demonstrate which trees will be protected with plastic and which will be protected with
chain link. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts,
driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The
applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to
be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of
monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection
measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree
protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate
suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be
processed.
Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have
more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be
shown on the plans, and adequately protected.
Finally, trees 10022 and 10023 are listed as retained on the grading plan and removed
on the tree plan. Also, the project arborist noted that it may be possible to retain these
trees if proper precautions are taken. Please have the applicant make a final
determination as to the status of these trees, keeping in mind that existing vegetation
should be protected as much as possible. Please have the applicant indicate what
methods will be used to protect these trees if it is determined that protection is possible.
18.745.040, Street Trees
The applicant has proposed to use existing trees as street trees. Please consider
having the applicant protect this existing vegetation per 18.745.030.E above.
B. Street tree plantinq list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and
sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be
subject to review by the Director.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree
Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the
American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the
Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees
based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil
amendments and modifications.
Street trees shall be chosen from the City of Tigard's Street Tree List unless otherwise
approved by the City Arborist.
18.745.050, Bufferinq and Screeninq
E. Screenin_q: special provisions.
1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas:
a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications
for this screening are as follows:
(1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features
which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design
features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and
raised planters;
(2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance
of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way;
(3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying
and vertical shrubbery and trees;
(4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and
shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven
parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and
The requirement of one tree for each seven parking spaces has not been met.
Also, please consider having the applicant specify the species of tree to be
planted in landscape islands and buffer areas. I would encourage them to
choose a large statured tree capable of providing a canopy effect.
(5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet
and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some
form of wheel guard or curb.
This requirement has been met.
18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement
A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist shal!be provided for any lot, parcel or
combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a
subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditiona! use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever
possible.
As required for partitions, the applicant submitted a tree plan conducted by Randy
Killen, a certified arborist. However, the report does not contain the four required
components and is therefore not acceptable (See 63 and B4 below for details).
B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees
including trees designated as significant by the city;
This requirement has been met
2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree
removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the
replacement guidelines of Section 98.790.060D, in accordance with the
following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other
development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
a. Retention of/ess than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper
requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section
18.790.060D of no net/oss of trees;
b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in
caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be
mitigated in accordance wifh Section 18.790.060D;
c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in
caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be
mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper
requires no mitigation.
The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This
represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate
and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code.
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
Trees 10022 and 10023 are listed as retained on the grading plan and removed on the
tree plan. Also, the project arborist noted that it may be possible to retain these trees if
proper precautions are taken. Please have the applicant make a final determination as
to the status of these trees, keeping in mind that protection is preferred over removal
wherever possible. Please have the applicant indicate what methods will be used to
protect these trees if it is determined that protection is possible.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used
by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction.
The tree protection plan does not show tree protection fencing for all of the trees to be
retained. Specifically, trees 10000, 10002, 10003, 10004, 10005, and 10006 do not
have protection. Please have the applicant show protection for these trees. Those
trees that are a significant distance from construction activities may be protected plastic
fencing instead of chain link.
All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be
protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Please have the applicant
demonstrate which trees will be protected with plastic and which will be protected with
chain link. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts,
driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The
applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to
be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of
monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection
measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree
protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate
suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be
processed.
Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have
more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be
shown on the plans, and adequately protected.
18.790.040 lncentives for Tree Retention
B. Subsequent remova!of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in
accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the
reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as
a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to
removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shal!
record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development
permit affected by this section to the efifect that such tree may be removed
only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The
deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree
preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed
as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shal!be subject to
approval by the Director.
A condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met.
18.790.050 Permit ApplicabilitY
A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for
the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as
defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be
processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using
the following approval criteria:
1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on
erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced
by an erosion contro/plan which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic
foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the
storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping,
discharge or as a result of the action of erosion;
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soi/s; turbid or
sediment laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on
bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site
using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified
Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules.
2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the
boundary of the stream or wetland, tree remova!must maintain no less
than a 75% canopy cover or no /ess than the existing canopy cover if the
existing canopy cover is /ess than 75%.
B. Effective date of permit. A tree removal permit shall be effective for one and
one-half years from the date of approval.
C. Extension. Upon written request by the applicant prior to the expiration of
the existing permit, a tree removal permit shall be extended for a period of
up to one year if the Director finds that the applicant is in compliance with
all prior conditions of permit approval and that no materia!facts stated in
the original application have changed.
D. Removal permit not required. A tree removal permit shall not be required
for the removal of a tree which:
1. Obstructs visual clearance as defined in Chapter 18.795 of the title;
2. /s a hazardous tree;
3. /s a nuisance affecting public safety as defined in Chapter 7.40 of the
Municipal Code;
4. !s used for Christmas tree production, or land registered with the
Washington County Assessor's office as tax-deferred tree farm or small
woodlands, but does not stand on sensitive lands.
E. Prohibition of commercial forestry. Commercial forestry as defined by
Section 18.790.020 A.2., excluding D.4. above, is not permifted.
This requirement does not appear to be applicable to this project.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Street Trees
The applicant has proposed to use existing trees as street trees. Please consider
having the applicant protect this existing vegetation per 18.745.030.E above.
The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree
Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the
American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the
Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees
based on the soil volume and size at maturitv. Additionally, there are directions for soil
amendments and modifications.
Street trees shall be chosen from the City of Tigard's Street Tree List unless otherwise
approved by the City Arborist.
Tree Mitigation
The applicant is proposing to retain six out of seven trees over 12" D.B.H. This
represents 85% retention of trees over 12". Therefore, they are not required to mitigate
and/or post a bond per Tigard Municipal Code.
Tree Protection
The tree protection plan does not show tree protection fencing for all of the trees to be
retained. Specifically, trees 10000, 10002, 10003, 10004, 10005, and 10006 do not
have protection. Please have the applicant show protection for these trees. Those
trees that are a significant distance from construction activities may be protected plastic
fencing instead of chain link.
All trees to be preserved that will be in close proximity to construction activities shall be
protected with five or six (5' - 6') foot high chain link fences. Please have the applicant
demonstrate which trees will be protected with plastic and which will be protected with
chain link. Fences are to be mounted on two inch diameter galvanized iron posts,
driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. The
applicant shall position fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to
be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of
monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection
measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree
protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate
suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be
processed.
Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have
more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be
shown on the plans, and adequately protected.
Finally, trees 10022 and 10023 are listed as retained on the grading plan and removed
on the tree plan. Also, the project arborist noted that it may be possible to retain these
trees if proper precautions are taken. Please have the applicant make a final
determination as to the status of these trees, keeping in mind that existing vegetation
should be protected as much as possible. Please have the applicant indicate what
methods will be used to protect these trees if it is determined that protection is possible.
If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist shall
prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and the likely
impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist
before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may
require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is
occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary report certifying that the
work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or
stability of the trees.
• If the Builder is different from the Developer or initial applicant:
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan
drawings indicating the locations of trees that were preserved on the lot during
site development. In addition, the plans shall include accurate locations of tree
canopy driplines and protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the
project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be
employed in building the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be
installed and inspected prior to commencing construction. The fencing shall
remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,
until the Certificate of Occupancy has been approved. After approval from the
City Arborist, the tree protection measures may be removed.
The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist
has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two weeks, as the
Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree protection zone
(TPZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall
evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing, determine if any
changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall justify why
the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction activities did not adversely
impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not
submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or
the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,
the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist
and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project
Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection
Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and
viable in their modified growing environment.
Deed Restriction
Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the applicant/owner shalt record
deed restrictions to the effect that any existing tree greater than 6" diameter may be
removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed
restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
!�
�. � ��
���
CleanWater Services
Our co�nmitineut is clear.
1.
���.¢`�,r���r��
ND� � ��'
4 ��07
MEMORANDUM C���'�`: -
�lp��`'���, �. : ;�., .
� ;t'�_,.. :�''�"`s'��
DATE: November 9, 2007
FROM: David Schweitzer, Clean Water Services
T(�: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner City of Tigard
SUBJECT: Review Comments—CUP 2007-00002 Broadway Rose Theater
GENERAL COMMENTS
■ This Land Use Review by Clean Water Services (District) does not constitute approval of
storm or sanitary sewer compliance with the NPDES permit held by the District. The
District, prior to issuance of any connection permit, must review and approve final
construction plans.
■ All provisions of the development submittal shall be in accordance with Clean Water
Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards, presently Resolution and Order No. 07-
20 (R&O 07-20), and all current Intergovernmental Agreements between the City and CWS.
■ Final construction plans must be reviewed by CWS for conformance with R&O 07-20 and a
Stormwater Connection Permit must be authorized by the District prior to construction.
SANITARY SEWER
■ The project as proposed will utilize the existing on site sanitary sewer line. If sufficient
capacity exists, this may be permitted.
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY
■ The project shall be provided with an individual connection to a public storm conveyance. A
cursory review of the preliminary plans attached to the Request far Comments indicates a
private storm system with a private water quality/quantity facility. If designing the facility to
CWS standards: Ensure the outflow pads are sized in accordance with R&O 07-20 table 5-5.
Ensure the planting meets Appendix A, and that a list of plants, sizes of plants and numbers
of plants is on the final construction plans. Ensure that suitable maintenance access to pond
structures is provided per chapter 4.02.
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
Phone: (503)681-3600• Fax: (503) 681-3603 •www.CleanWaterServices.org
��
. ` ��
��_
CleanWater Services
Our commitment is cicar.
■ Final construction plans shall show all existing and proposed public and private storm
conveyance and easements.
SENSITIVE AREA
■ Sensitive areas will not be significantly impacted by this project. A Sensitive Area Pre-
Screening Site Assessment(SAPSSA) has been issued for this project, CWS File Number
07-003015 dated August 08, 2007 for Ta�Map Lots 2S1 02CB-00100 and 00200 and will
serve as the Service Provider Letter for this project. This SPL was issued with the
Development Activity described as"additional parking",but not including the addition to the
building. An amended SPL shall be required for Tax/Map lot 2S 1 02BC-08700 which was
not included on the original SAPSSA. Please include all facets of Development Activity on
the amendment.
EROSION CONTROL
■ If the improvements disturb 1-acre or more; site improvements and any improvements within
the public Right Of Way, a NPDES 1200-C Permit is required.
■ Provide erosion control in accordance with the current CWS design and construction
standards.
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
Phone: (503)681-3600• Fax: (503) 681-3603 •www.CleanWaterServices.org
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner
TO: 11/14/07
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer��m
RE: CUP2007-00002 Broadway Rose
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant's plans indicate that the access to the facility will be from the
existing driveways. The applicant states in the narrative that the 24 foot wide
drive aisle can accommodate two-way traffic. However, to mitigate traffic
impacts with the existing parking lot, the applicant has proposed a one-way traffic
flow pattern. This one-way traffic flow pattern is shown on Sheet A1.02. The
applicant shall add the one-way traffic flow pattern to Sheet C2.1 so that it will be
included with the PFI Permit application submittal.
The one-way traffic pattern striping shall be completed prior to a final building
inspection.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
Grant Avenue is classified as a Neighborhood Route, therefore this criterion does
not apply.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 1
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
Grant Avenue is classified as a Neighborhood Route (local street). The applicant
is not proposing to construct any new streets along Grant Avenue to serve this
development, therefore this criterion does not apply.
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.8101:
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
Neighborhood Route (local street) to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and
32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street
parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm
drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW Grant Avenue, which is classified as a
Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present,
there is approximately 47 feet of ROW radius for the cul-de-sac bulb, according
to the most recent tax assessor's map.
SW Grant Avenue is currently improved to a 40 foot paved radius. No additional
improvements are required along the Grant Avenue frontage with this
development.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
local street to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section.
Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 2
bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street
trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW School Street, which is classified as a local street
on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately
10 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's
map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline plus additional ROW at the SE terminus to provide an offset cul-de-sac
bulb. In past discussions it was thought that the School had dedicated the entire
20 feet of existing ROW, however, the City Surveyor did additional research.
This research indicates that the School only dedicated 10 feet of ROW and the
adjacent property owners dedicated the remaining 10 feet of ROW. This requires
the School to dedicate 17 feet of ROW, not 7 feet as originally thought. City
Engineering staff will provide the layout of the required ROW dedication for the
portion of cul-de-sac bulb that impacts this development. The applicant shall
then prepare a legal description and exhibit for recordation with Washington
County LUT.
SW School Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact
from this development, the applicant should enter into a future street
improvement agreement.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of
no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where
prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing
developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other
restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street
connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a
regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and
collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within
the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns
or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or
extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure
the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered
topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance
of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical
constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that
a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the
constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 3
Grant Avenue serves the school site from two directions, but does not connect. It
is not expected to connect in the near future due to the existing development
pattern.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing befinreen connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 4
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
There are existing sidewalks along SW Grant Street that will remain. There are
no sidewalks along the SW School Street frontage. The applicant is required to
enter into a future street improvement agreement that will include the
construction of sidewalks, thereby meeting this criterion.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant states the existing sanitary sewer lateral will be used for this
project.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 5
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surFaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
The applicant proposes to construct a water quality/detention pond on site. This
extended dry detention pond will detain most of the runoff from the newly created
impervious surface area.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
� Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 6
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
Public Water Svstem:
The City of Tigard provides service in this area. There is a public water line in
SW Grant Avenue. The applicant will utilize the existing water line that connects
to the public main and install a new 1 inch meter.
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water
quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition,
the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.
To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the
design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance
with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at
significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction.
Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 7
Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality
facility is in compliance with the design and specifications.
Gradinq and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any
development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is
over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit
from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with
the site and/or building permit.
The applicant shall submit an application for an NPDES 1200C Permit to the City
of Tigard with their PFI Permit application.
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of a site permit, Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit
is required for this project to cover the water quality/detention facility and any
work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement
plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:
these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division
and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public
Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard
Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and
the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 8
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. The applicant's plans shall be revised so that Sheet C2.1 shows the one-
way traffic flow markings at the existing driveways.
. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality
facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) as
a part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Included with
the plans shall be a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan.
. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion
Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February
2003 edition."
. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of
Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL
BUILDING INSPECTION:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the water
quality/detention facility and any work in the public right-of-way (or public
easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department.
. Prior to a final building inspection, the one-way traffic flow markings shall be
installed at the driveways as shown on Sheets A1.02 and C2.1.
Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of
SW School Street to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline.
Additional ROW shall be dedicated at the SE terminus to provide for a
portion of an offset cul-de-sac bulb. The City Engineer staff will provide the
design of the offset cul-de-sac bulb. The description shall be tied to the
existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City
forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 9
. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to
complete or participate in the future improvements of SW School Street
adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed
by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction
expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the
subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate
by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements
by others adjacent to the subject site.
. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction
standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for
the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform
construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for
compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be
made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to
final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of
Tigard Engineering staff with written confirmation that the water quality
facility is in compliance with the design and specifications.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2007-00002 BROADWAY ROSE PAGE 10
' � 1
� � �'
� ����
Tualatin Valley .��
Fire & Rescue ZOOI
,:._4
November 19, 2007
Cheryl Caines, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: (CUP) 2007-00002 Broadway Rose Theatre Cafeteria Renovation
Dear Cheryl,
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development
project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions
of approval:
1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When
buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire
apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. {IFC 503.1.1)
2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads
shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (12 feet for up to two dwelling units and accessory
buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Where fire apparatus
roadways are less than 26 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway
and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 26 feet wide but less than 32
feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed.
Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (IFC 503.2.1)
The fire district does not endorse the design concept wherein twenty feet of unobstructed roadway
width is not provided.
3) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both
sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Roads 26 feet wide or less shall be posted on both
sides as a fire lane. Roads more than 26 feet wide to 32 feet wide shall be posted on one side as a fire lane.
Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7
feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective
background. (IFC D103.6)
4) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is
easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds
point load (wheel load) and 60,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide
documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. (IFC
D102.1)
5) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not
exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi,
whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is
available from the Fire Marshal's OfFice. (IFC 6105.2)
Fire flow demand calculations must be submitted to and approved by this office prior to our
endorsement for the issuance of a site development permit.
Nortlr Division Offrce
14480 SW Jenkins Road, Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax: 503-G44-2214 www.tvfr.com
- .
� r ,
� '
Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue
6) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants available
to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1.
Considerations for placinq fire hydrants may be as follows:
• Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved.
Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected
with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the
required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official.
• Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not
contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by
the fire code official.
• Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number
of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official.
7) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective
markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the
access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a
centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (IFC 508.5.4)
8) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a
fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire
apparatus access roadway. FDC's shall normally be remote except when approved by the fire code official.
(IFC 912.2)
9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus
access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible
construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (IFC 1410.1 & 1412.1)
10) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for
an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (IFC 506)
We trust this letter will be helpful with the final design of this proposal insofar as fire apparatus access and
firefighting water supplies are concerned. If there is anything about this letter you do not understand, disagree
with, or wish to discuss further, please call me.
Sincerely,
John K . Dalby
John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II
Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division
14480 SW Jenkins Road
Beaverton, OR 97005-1152
(503) 356-4723
Nortlr Division Ojfice
14480 SW Jenkins Road, Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone: 503-356-4700 Fax:503-644-2214 www.tvfr.com
Cheryl Caines
From: Maris Buxton
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:10 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Broadway Rose TIF
$4,389.00
From: Cheryl Caines
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:09 PM
To: Maris Buxton
Subject: RE: Broadway Rose TIF
There are a total of 93 parking spaces, but the new spaces total 65.
Cheryl
From: Maris Buxton
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Broadway Rose TIF
It will be based on the number of additional parking spaces. (Is it still 51?) If so, it will be a fee of$3,459.00.
From: Cheryl Caines
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:55 PM
To: Maris Buxton
Subject: Broadway Rose TIF
Maris,
Will there be a TIF for the Broadway Rose. There is a small addition. What info do you need?
Cheryl
�
MAILING /
NOTIFICATION
RECORDS
� �
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
.,
,.
THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY °
�F THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. . � ,
In the Matter of the Proposed Land Lse r�pplicarions for:
Land Use File Nos.: CUP2007-00002
Land Use File Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
I, Cheryl Caines, r�ssociate Planner for the Cit�- of Tigard, do affirm that I posted norice of the land use proposal
affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently
registered) l� �5�> v�� CG�-<< �i f� Av-e r�v t� , and
did personally� post norice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use applicarion(s) by means of weatherproof
posting in the general viciniry of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference
made a part hereof, on the ��� day of �c:'c'�ti� �c : ,20 �'�.
�.��.� �� C�«�
Signatur of Person Who Performed Posting
(In the presence of the tiotar��)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
STATE OF E%QE�o��� )
County of U>>4�N li•l��� ) ss.
� AL D UE,(,{BE/Z ,20
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of
OFFICIAI SF/1L
sMIRLEY L TREA7
NOTARY PUBUC-ORE(3pN ,/, ��
COMMISSION NO.�id777 cJ�LC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 NOTARY P BLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires: �{/.���1(
h:Alo�n\�am�\mustcr.\affida�ic of posting f�>r a�plicant to post public hearing.doc
I E F P B LI C H EARI �
N
0
U
N
'1'he f�llc���nn r will be considcrcd b}� thc Ti ard Hearin s Officer on Monda December 10 2007 at 7:00 PM at the
'I'igard Civic �enter - Town Hall, 13125 SW a B v ., '1'i�;ar , Oregon. Bot pu ic ora an written tesrimonv is invited.
The public hearin on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the '1'igard Municipal Code and the rules of
procedure ado�te� by the Council and available at ('ity Hall or the rules of �rocedure set forth in Chapter 18.390.
I estimony may be submitted in writin� prior to or at the public hearin or verbally at the public hcarin� only. Failure to
raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of t�e hearin�; accom�anied by statements or evidence
sufficicnt to afford the decision-maker an op ortunity to, res ond to the issue prccludes appeal to thc I,and Use Board of
A�p peal based on that issue. Failure to s��eci�y the criterion �rom the Community Development Code or Comprehensive
Pian at which a comment is directed precrudes an appeal based on that criterion.
A copy of the.application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the a plicant and the a��licak.��
criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available �or in�pection at no cost at
least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a rcasonable cost.
I{urther infc�rmation may be obtained from the Planning Division staff contact: Che 1 Caines at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,
'I'igard, Orc�on 97223, b�� callin� 503-639-4171, or by cmail to che c ri ar -or. ov.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
- BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a
cafeteria/auditorium at C.F�,. Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose
Theatre. Proposed work includes a 2,600 square foot addition. The renovated building will �-
used as theatre space and administrative offices for the Broadway Rose Theatre. LOCATION:
12850 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S102CB, Tax Lot 100
and 2S102BC, Tax Lot 8700. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12
zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of
3,050 square feet. r, wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330,
18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
-- .,,,yC7V�— � W �/ � � • ' �
� rLOGHnP��iC iN��JRMAT•ON SvSiFM
� °� o � � AREA NOTIFIED j
��� :„n� (5 00')
�O� n.�n � ,,,, �
men
� ��(� ntea Kn � II---- ----------i
� '� mcm � aw� -- -
aten
nrcm aum fiime tamen� �'��Z: �arancesca C7�11TlbetYl
�- K����� � fr
mem �iaKn � �ti�/
a memeP� n� men ��. u��` � R�'.: �,UI�Z��U7-����2
roar
me memw enenn: � mo� / ----------------
menn� � /
i\ � n� me � �:ro aun
mme�ar
aimu� muuu n� �n�
Y N
inau�nN : an,y�� mmem�: � S'�, mm�nm �
P,� ime�ro fn�eu p�
\ °� mnn�nn np °�
mnn�wn v n�eww
me mm�ma
mo�w nm�� �
,,,.,,�,,,,, /" n��„p � .• rn��n �� Property owner information
F, __ _ Q� np�tx� m�=���nn nu�n is valid for 3 months from
mn���� � n""" the date printed on this map. �
� mewu une�m: ` �
\
- wATfp/�S--PL mmenu me�rm mew� mnmru I
I simew� ot�ow� '
mme�»n mmam� � mn � mm�nm�'9��
i - -- mew�
: �:���� a:��� ��o: � G
I m�»eu�� I n�mnw� ot°c eman �
� _ �:a�n _�=���s n�n mo:c�ann
_ I �:�ew� nn o
nue�ro �teu� nmaw
I � - -aae� a / te�om
I Ji � o:cu u n
I � mneooae
wr�o�� oeuno
I DELL CT 1 0lt1�� ��'� neunw
neu� a eu� � mnan��
ne�e anu
nn��
m eur w �, �:cu e n���
ne�o e moeunw mume neum� a �
-y, e� e
i Z ne� nenuw �
�,
- ; �:e�n
� I � �nam� y�. ne�ws mnontu� I ♦
� m a� aan�
r--� �A �� N
C � I n�re�a n �� m�reu�rt �� tnnuuu� � 4
� iuwnn maa�r� �\
- , ! 1- ` --�-1 i
PARK ST o �oo zoo aoo aoo soo Feel
, _ _ PARK ST m an� � �
�-- __�
/r na��sw
1"=360 feet
- -- ��m�rnm m�aa� �'�
maw�
�
--w m p u �
> mnuu� ��
am
Q
� _ __ li11lp1lIN � _
1
L_ �_
COOK W ��� �
—i ��
� Q. ` Infortna6on oo this map is for penenl location onty and
I Q �� ahould be verified with the Develapnent Services Divisan.
� / 13125 SW Hall Blvd
Z� -- — \ TigarQOR 97223
� ..1 �I _I�I_._ I \ // \\ �I (503)639-4171
http://w�v.ci.Ugard or us
Community Development Plot date:Oct 18,2007;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
2S 102 C B-07500 2S t 02C B-02100
13500 PACIFIC CORP CACH FAMILY SMALL PROPERTIES LLC
BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY BY REGENCY MANAGEMENT INC
PEN510NS INC 13670 SW WRIGHTWOOD CT
21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 TIGARD,OR 97224
NORTHVILLE,MI 48167
251026D-02800 2S1028�-02400
AFTER FIVE LLC CAMPBELL SANDRA RAE
10330 SW TUALATIN RD 12820 SW GRANT AVE
TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223
2 1028D-02700 2S102CB-03400
AF R FI LLC CANTAS LLC
103 TUALATIN RD 4223 GLENCOE AVE STE#A-220
T ALATIN, OR 97062 MARINA DEL REY,CA 90292
2S102BC-00175 2S102BD-02201
ARBUTHNOT STEPHEN P CHALET VILLAGE LLC
7080 SW PALMER WAY TWO CENTERPOINTE DR STE 210
BEAVERTON,OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
2S 7 02C B-06100 2S 7 02CB-00300
ARNOLD LOURINDA J CHUNG HENRY&COMPANY
10455 SW GRANT CT BY CSK AUTO PROP MGMT
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 19063
PHOENIX,AZ 85005
257028C-03700 2S102BC-08500
BIGEJ KIMBERLY R CIMPAN SIMION
12860 SW WATKINS AVE 12750 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251026D-01001 2S1026C-03800
BLINE RONALD G& CLIFTON ROGER F
SAGUN JUDITH L SANDRA LEE
2190 SKYLINE DR 12840 SW WATKINS
SEASIDE,OR 97138 TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-07300 2S102C8•02500
BRANCH MARCUS D CNL FUNDING 2000-A LP
12604 SW PATHFINDER CT PO BOX 1671
PORTLAND, OR 97223 ORLANDO,FL 32802
2S1026C-08400 102C8-D2400
BURLESON STEPHEN M CN UN 2000-A LP
12740 SW WATKINS AVE PO 1671
TIGARD,OR 97223 LANDO, 32802
2siozeo-o220o zsiozsc-ooeoo
BUSCHA HELMUT AND ERIKA COLLING CHARLES
6215 SW 41 ST AVE 13835 SW HALL BLVD
PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-00901 2S102BC-04303
COLLING CHARLES W FINKE ALEX
13835 SW HALL P O BOX 23562
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026D-02000 251028C-043 0
COMET CORPORATION FIN
BY W5C0 PETROLEUM#225 P O 3562
2929 NW 29TH ARD,O 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97210
2S102BD-02101 2S1028C-04305
CO T CORP TION FINKE HANS C
BY WS TROLEUM#225 PO BOX 1565
292 29 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
RTLAND, OR 97210
2S102BD-01200 2S102BC-04307
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO FINKE HANS C&SUSAN M
PO BOX 1539 PO BOX 1565
PASO ROBLES, CA 93447 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S702CB-03301 2S1026C-04300
DARROW DON S FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN&
9952 SW FREWING ST FINKE SUSAN M
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S 102C B-00400 2S 7 02 BC-04304
ELWELL JOHN A FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN CUSTODIAN
10230 SW SCHOOL ST FOR FINKE NICHOLAS A
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2sio2ac-oosos 2siozsc-oasos
ENG TONY&CINDY L FINKE LOTTI
PO BOX 23086 HANS-CHRISTIAN
PORTLAND, OR 97281 P O BOX 23562
TIGARD,OR 97223
25102BC-03200 2S102BC-04000
EWELL LANNY W&MARIAN S FLANAGAN PATRICK M&
12975 SW WATKINS AVE SCHMIDT LESLIE
TIGARD,OR 97223 1056D SW PATHFINDER
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028C-03600 2S1028C-01804
FIDLER GEORGE E JR& FORD JOSEPH E JULIE B
MADELINE M A PO BOX 230801
PO BOX 230794 TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97281
2S1o2BC-o17o2 2S1o2BC-olaoo
FIELD-EATON FREDERICK AND FRAZEE JOHN J JR&NOREEN L
KRISTINE E 10250 SW WALNUT ST
12680 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-00901 2S1026D-02501
FRIEDRICH SHERREE R HATCHADOURIAN WENDY D
12805 SW GRANT AVE 12840 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-04100 2S102C8-00302
FURINO RICK G& ERIN L HELIOS PROPERTIES LLC
12760 SW WATKINS AVE 7366 SW IRON HORSE
TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97D70
2S102CB-00900 2S102BD-01900
GARGER JERRY E HENDERSON MARILYN D HUDSON TR
13070 SW GRANTAVE 11795 SW KATHERINE ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S 102 BC-08100 2 102C B-03101
GEORGE ERO E HE R MARILYN D HUDSON TR
6065 165TH 1179 THERINE ST
ALOHA, OR 97007 ARD,OR 24
251026C-04301 2S102BC-01808
GEORGESON THEODORE& HERNANDEZ MARIA DELUZ
GEORGESON KATHERINE 12535 SW WATKINS AVE
SUITE 110-PMB 120 TIGARD,OR 97223
14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
2 S 102C B-06300 2S 102C B-01200
GIBSON LORI L HESS DAVID A&GAIL K
10470 SW GRANT CT 13170 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CB-05800 2S102CB-00500
GNAU MICHAEL F&ANGEL S HILCHEN PAUL&LEANN
10395 SW GRANT CT 10250 SW SCHOOL ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-03400 2S102CB-01600
GROAT RANDALL S&CAROLYN J HOLCOMBE RYAN&KATIE
13010 SW WATKINS 10395 SW PARK ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-01100 2S102C6-06200
HARDY GERALD T HOROWITZ ALAN R AND
120 RAINBOW DR PMB 2017 JUDITH BERMAN
LIVINGSTON,TX 77399 10475 SW GRANT COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-00700 2S102C8-06500
HASSEL STEVEN F&STACEY L HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
10115 SW WALNUT ST WASHINGTON COUNTY
TIGARD,OR 97223 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
2 02C B-05700 2S102BC-00300
HO G HORITY OF JOHNSON LORREN
WASHI ON COUNTY 10155 5W WALNUT ST
111 LIN N ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223
LLSBORO,OR 97124
102CB-06600 2S102BC-03701
HO ING HORITY OF JOHNSTON ELSIE W
WASHI ON COUNTY 12890 SW WATKINS
111 LIN N ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223
LSBORO,OR 97124
2S1028C-07600 2S102BD•02500
HOYT ROBERT E&HELEN L KACHLIK-NEWBERG LLC
12735 SW WATKINS AVE 911 5W BROADWAY DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201
2S1026C-00113 2S1026D-02600
HUNT JAMES A 8� KIM PENNEY
JOSEPHSON SARA J 395 NW SILVERADO DR
12570 SW BROOKSIDE AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97006
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102C8-oos00 2S102CB-01700
HUTCHISON DENNIS E&ELKE E KIMMEL KRISTA L
10270 SW SCHOOL ST 10365 SW PARK ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102C B-00303 25102C B-00700
J PATINO'S LLC KING MARLENE R
3206 NE GLISSAN 13040 SW GRANT ST
PORTLAND, OR 97232 TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-01700 2S1026C-08000
JACKSON LINDA K KRAL GEORGE L&SARA
12670 SW WATKINS AVE 12765 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
zs�o2sC-o2soo 2S�o26C-a�aos
JAMES ALAN K&JULIE A KRALL FRED&PATRICIA HELEN
12875 SW WATKINS AVE 12560 SW PATHFINDER CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-01101 2S703DA-00100
JARVIS MICHAEL LEE& LEPPER CHAD&MI YOUNG
DIANNA C 13060 SW WATKINS AVE
10120 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-03500 2S102BD-02100
JENSEN RONALD M& LIM KYUNG S
JENSEN ERI K 2006 SE 11TH
13000 SW WATKINS AVE PORTLAND,OR 97214
TIGARD, OR 97223
2si o2ac-o�soo zs�ozce-a�soo
MARTIN DAVID K&SARAH H MORTENSEN TIM 8�SHANNON
12620 SW PATHFINDER CT 13155 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CB-03200 2S102BC-01100
MASSIH LLC MUMM RICHARD C
PO BOX 108 75104 STAGE GULCH RD
BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PENDLETON,OR 97801
2S102CB-07700 2S102BC-03702
MCBREEN-MCKENZIE DEBORAH L NEAL CHERYL L
12850 SW FONNER POND PL 12880 SW WATKINS
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251028C-02800 2S702BC-07200
MCCULLOCH GRANT H JR AND NIDAY CATHERINE R
SHIRLEY 12695 SW WATKINS ST
12905 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102C B-06400 2 S 102 BC-07400
MCCUSKER PATRICK J AND NYDIGGER MARK A&YVONNE K
NANCY B 12630 SW PATHFINDER CT
10450 SW GRANT CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2sio2ec-oazoo 2s�o2cs-o��oo
McDOWELL DEANNA L O'CONNOR S CASEY
12745 SW WATKINS 13150 SW GRANTAVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-04400 2S102C8-02300
MEERMANS MARY L PACIFIC PROPERTIES
10605 SW WATKINS PL BY MARTIN JOHNSON
TIGARD, OR 97223 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026D-03100 2S102CB-06700
MIDAS PROPERTIES INC PACIFIC PROPERTIES GENERAL
REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING DEPT PARTNERSHIP
1300 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY
ITASCA, IL 60143 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CB-00800 2S102BC-03900
MIRANDA PEDRO& PALM JULIE C
SOFIA 12820 SW WATKINS AVE
12255 SW GREENBURG RD#17 TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97281
2S 102C B-03302 2 S 102 BD-00904
MORRISON LACY A PELLETIER PHILIP
9950 SW FREWING CT 8835 SW BELL FLOWER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S1026 D-00905 2S102BC-00114
PELLETIER PHILIP S ROSINSKI BARBARA E&
8835 SW BELLFLOWER LN AMLER SUSAN M
TIGARD, OR 97224 16307 SW 108TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S102CB-02000 2S102BC-00701
PETTIJOHN PAUL SAMUELS ROBERT C ROBIN R
25710 E BRIGHT AVE 8735 SW LEHMAN 5T
WELCHES,OR 97067 PORTLAND,OR 97223
2 S 103 DA-00200 2S 102C B-03500
, PHILLIPS WILLIAM C SANDSTROM GLENN M&MARGERY A
PO BOX 3642 9405 SW PALOUSE LN
TUALATIN, OR 97062 TUALATIN,OR 97062
251028C-01803 2S102BC-00900
PHILLIPS WILLIAM C&LOIS J SCHULZE LLOYD&EVELYN FAMILY T
20209 SW COMANCHE TER BY LLOYD H&EVELYN M SCHULZE TRS
TUALATIN,OR 97062 8780 5W INDIAN HILL LN
BEAVERTON,OR 97008
2 S 102C B-03504 2S t 02 BC-03300
POPAT KAUSHIK L 8 SEINWERTH DANIEL TODD&
BINA S THERESA MARIE
6783 PASEO SAN LEON 13035 SW WATKINS AVE
PLEASANTON, CA 97566 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102C B-03401 2S 102C B-05900
PRITCHARD ANTON B SHEA JAMES C JR&
10045 SW GARRET 5T SUSAN K
TIGARD,OR 97223 10405 SW GRANT CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-01701 2S102BD-03200
QADIR RASHEED SHULER GARY
6301 SW PALATINE#A28 30790 NE FERNWOOD
PORTLAND,OR 97219 NEWBERG,OR 97132
2S 102 BC-01102 2S 102C B-03501
RESHEY MARILYN REV LIV TRUST SORENSEN BROCK
BY MARILYN LEE RESHEY TR 20 WALKING WOODS DR
10160 SW WALNUT ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102BC-02400 2S1026C-04302
RIZZUTTO CLYDE ALLEN SPRINGER-GEORGESON KATHERINE 8
JULIE ANN GEORGESON THEODORE
12805 SW WATKINS 14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 SUITE 11 D-PMB 120
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
2S1026C-01802 2S102BC-01600
ROBINSON JEREMY J&LISA M STEVENSON THOMAS J/LAURI C
12615 SW WATKINS AVE 12660 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
zsiazcs-o�zoo 2siozec-oisoo
SUBRAMANIAN LAXMANPRAKASH& TINSLEY FRANK&VICKY
ADINARAYANAN SASIKALA 10270 SW WALNUT ST
10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102CA-01300 2S'102CB-03000
SUSNJARA MARKO A/BETTY M TRAIN ARTHUR&
16225 NE EUGENE CT CLINE MARY E
PORTLAND, OR 97230 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102C B-010D0 2S 1028 D-02900
SWEET JEFF TRUCK TERMINALS
13130 SW GRANT AVE 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY
PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97229
251026C-01800 25102BD-03000
SWINFORD CLARK H& TRUCK TERMINALS INC
AMANDA K 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY
10330 SW WALNUT ST PORTLAND,OR 97229
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-00902 2S1026C-01805
TAYLOR JEFF R TUCK KARRY&VALERIE G
12780 SW CREEKSHIRE DR 12540 SW PATHFINDER CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
zsio2sc-oiao� zs�o2aC-oi2oo
THOMAS MARC C 8 CAROL A WALP GEORGIA J
10360 SW WALNUT ST 10200 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2 S 102C B-02301 2 S 102C8-D2600
TIGARD MEDICAL CENTER WALTER ANGELA D
13200 SW PACIFIC HWY 2863 RIVERWALK LP
TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97401
2S102BC-08700 2 102C6-03300
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL WA ER ELA D
DISTRICT#23J 286 RWALK LP
6960 SW SANDBURG ST GENE, 97401
TIGARD,OR 97223
t 02C6-00100 2S102C6-02700
TI RD-TU TIN SCHOOL WA R A LA D
DIST 23J 2863 R WALK LP
6960 NDBURG ST E NE,O 401
ARD, OR 7223
zs zca-oozoo 2S102BC-08300
TIGA D-TUA TIN SCHOOL WALTERS DONALD
DISTRI 3J 12730 SW WATKINS AVE
6960 NDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223
T ARD,OR 7223
2S102BD-02300
WATSON RONALD A&
CLAUDIA A WATSON TRUST
4359 NW TAM O-SHANTER WAY
PORTLAND,OR 97229
2S102CB-019o1
WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP
PO BOX 23408
EUGENE,OR 97402
2Sio28C-ooio2
WEEKS CHERREE L&
WINTER RAVEN E
12595 SW BROOK5IDE AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S�o2BC-o25o0
WILSON CLARENCE A AND
BETTY L
12831 SW WATKINS
TIGARD,OR 97223
1o2C6-o7s00
WI M RRACE OWNERS OF
ALL
2S102BC-07100
WOLFORD WILLIAM K&NANCY RUTH
12687 SW WATKINS ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102 BC-002o0
WOODARD CHARLES L ARLIE
10215 SW WALNUT AVE
PO BOX 23303
TIGARD,OR 97223
2sio2ac-o�soo
W DARD ARLES L ARLIE
1021 ALNUT
PO 303
T ARD,OR 7223
2 S 102C B-06000
WOOLLETT THOMAS S
12700 SW 231ST PL
HILLSBORO,OR 97123
2S1026C-01300
ZIGLIHSKI E PATRICIA
REVCABLE LIVING TRUST
BY E PATRICIA ZIGLINSKI TR
10230 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
Brooks Gaston
3206 Princess
Edinburg, TX 78539
Don & Dorothy Erdt
13760 SW 121stAvenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ellen Beilstein
14630 SW 139th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Martha Bishop
10590 SW Cook Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Vanessa Foster
13085 SW Howard Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Susan Beilke
11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
Patricia Keerins
12195 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136th Place
Tigard, OR 97224
!'ITV AC TIGAR�I _ fGAITRAI IAITFRLCTGII PARTI[C I�•�..��..,i.,1�o+�,,,�i�tioi�+riT re.,+��i ,�.,,.� i ionnTCn• �� nn�„_nF
. c •
CITY OF TIGA�D
COMMUNITY DE VE LOPME NT DE PAR'I1VIE NT ,�
PLANNING DIVISION _
13125 SW HALL BOLJLEVARD -
TTGARD, OREGON 97223
PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 (Attn: Patry/Planning) EMAIL: patt}{�ti�ard-or.�o�•
REQLIEST FOR 5OO-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER MAILING LIST
Properry owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request
INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP &TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S 134AB, T�Lot 00100) OR 7T�
ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW:
, �Srl._2c�� ; C��; ;zc�v�
2S102C�0100 and 2S102C�08700 ���5�,
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR
HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City,
and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an
incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING
TO OSTAIN YOUR LABELS. PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS.
� Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Address Labels Required
The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-
rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and
resu6mitted to the Ciry for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application
and the decision. The 2 sets ot envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up
and pay f or the labels when they are ready.
NAlVIE OF CONTACT PERSON:Francesca Gambetti PHONE: ,�503)-242-0084
NAME OF CONII'ANY:Shiels Obletz Johnsen,Inc. FAX: (503)-299-6769
EMAIL: francescaCc�sojpdx.com
This request may be einailed, mailed, f�ed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day iiiuiiiii�un
for processing requests. Upon comp l�e�tion of your request, the contact person lLCted will be called to pick up their
request that will be placed in "Will Call" by the comp any name (or by the contact person's last name if no compan�
at the Planning/Enguieering Counter at the Perniit Center.
The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined.
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS
PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Cost Description:
$11 to generate the mailing list,plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiplythe cost t�
print one set of labeLs by the number of sets requested.
- EXAMPLE - - COST FOR THIS REQLJEST -
4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet = 8.00 a 2 scts = �16.00 15 sheet(s)of labels x�2/sheet =�� � sets = c�,� �`�'��
1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested panies x 2 secs= $ 4.00 L sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties =�x�.s�tg`"t� � D
GENERATE LIST = $11.00 —
TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL /���
/.!
Broadway Rose Theatre
Lot Line Adjustment
usr V.mwu . W.v�� «a i ro,o in�.a
acau].�sA.�e.tx - � I�y�e'�� w[m.i oio BM 0{/30/2003
1 mm�ir+owl!�aanoY' sasYaoY aas(em�IS wa wrH im N.wc ur r�ea
�.�.�o��.�..�e� "0 29,424 DLL OS/Ol/200]
';'°° ca�mar�.
�^��� BwT'o7/t7/200:
W�m —
� ��T� DLL 07/l7/200J
rMwusro�ir ii�m�.n�row6.�ona�a v�rm�m�n�m «..a
w.a�.m�. I
uena w�uon�mx nui Sx M��»�M xo ion.
� ntYal fu�Ells Owp M�IaM 1u�.bl! � '�„ �
; r.r�:`i'ii'�.:°�a�.�a.'�"�mc�0w�ra,ua�r�.�o�.�.o, .s W 3
1a �
� — � 3
x � -
: � .._ o' }a' co' iza' q �
y ��� `nZ�
. �n � �C. ��F�
tmn 8. <Q
� ^ aori
'..nYr�r i �aZ
�. W a J c
IlSWiMn ... \\ �4MC� �Y�r
1�01 fAI1fM � � � �au� ��5 W
Mll1.RQ3 �{IC. _ —. . —� '��Q
m �
x s.w. cw�+r nvE. __. —— G-�p_—---- �,-•,w,y•,,,, .s S.W. CRAH�AVE. p�'�o a�.z
g — —����'� +T — -Q--B------ � -- . �� — p,wFO� �
I Q P"� ru�m ar.awn snrt* i::"���vrv�wv �x L�� \��
t
���w i a ��.��Rm� 1 ��;����
�n tii.esseoe• 1 ,��raw ve'w.�oo � �a�3}c�
� I 1 ' RO RASIC Ci ��i4�0 Qn 'Z N F-�
I� r� 1�111r�510f ICn OI MY o@f ld °t�.L LECENOU va s n Z~
1��S �fl➢ 4[EObIEMI MD iW115�1F I r�9.g. I�ml rtmo • x erx �i n li�O�
I� �muH.. •! sw a.k,..�, w o0
n ��
I: ���aom a�im�sm q 't � ro v�a..,. u xortu p: a Z=O
ay �M Om ¢O=
N � s I A "` k »w.u,w�.n.�s'.uE' f�"'z°a c�7 v
.+ �Q\zN
ia�u im.t y § � N=
g � �x`� mw�/�•nnr.t . �na3aF
im N N ( nuv s.vmoiw aoe �p Z 3 s
3�I> � � OF°�
I' I WOJ � I
�I �o[[o�ixe�w��a lDf{I O Z 0 Z(�0
Iq��oF�
p �� �amo s/e'Mux¢u 1 y`.'� n'�a�o F
I �n aco nunc cw V p a
.rsa,ero.i.�.�s.eae- I �d a�7��R%
��sn�.w�o���i� �o���n•� a.�a a�°
w�� �� -�..���.n, ,� ��o�
xnww•oow a i wm.ni ,m�a..c:..a�?4.-.,.,,„. �:
l�un� u,smwt- I . . ':
�c a �`�o•rwsmr rm ...:�,�.py w.�i ...,;x.;�='-a'v� rwn SR'aw am � I
? I �SlIQ1�u1M M I!�RMII[W �
iM ss MSCMSL YLIkLSWC MM o�
2 &
t � A R G E L --'� m�o�vo�,��a
� I P ,,,,o�� R � �o'....'°°"u..�.`T�m
' � � "°` ��
�s/�'in rn 1�l a E.��..a Ma�N ru
•�����``�'�� �"�� �a°��� REC�IVED PLANNING
I KiD ��y,p�q7 J/�C19[P��� ���.��� 11787
hi�RLStm'
���n•.a� ,s, ._s�.� �.:�.s e..�,m- �:,�`� FEB 2 3 2006 Ao,���e.
�6aiBm 1[nunM pF h3l1 Cuo-s�rA'wY ti�v SPMa aM[ ra.He 7RI60.DNG
---- _ SW PA�IFlC HIGHWAY ow w.n WASNINGTON CWNtt$URKYqYS OFFILE ' OF �
' — — --- °°`""'r'°" CITY OF TIGARD •-03 �K�� --
—�. ICCEVIE�Fdl F.MC - �
I
Patty L��nsford - RE: Mailing Labels for CUP2007-00002 Page 1
From: Patty Lunsford
To: Francesca
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:56:54 PM
Subject: RE: Mailing Labels for CUP2007-00002
Francesca,
Your request is ready to be picked up. The cost is $45.00 and is due when you pick it up. I will leave
your request in "will-call" at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center under your last name.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Patricia Lunsford
Planning Administrative Assistant
City of Tigard, Oregon
503.718.2438
patty@tigard-or.gov
»> "Francesca " <francesca@sojpdx.com> 10/18/07 3:21 PM »>
Looks good -thanks. Let me know when they will be ready (hoping to submit
the package tomorrow!).
Thanks again...
>fg
francesca gambetti � shiels obletz johnsen, inc. � ph 503.242.0084 � fax
503.299.6769
1140 sw eleventh avenue, suite 500, portland, or 97205
-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Lunsford (mailto:PATTY(a�tiqard-or.povl
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:13 PM
To: francesca(c�soipdx.com
Subject: Re: Mailing Labels for CUP2007-00002
HiFrancesca,
I am planning on including all three tax lots for notification purposes.
Please take a look at the attached map and give me a call or email me with
your thoughts.
Patricia Lunsford
Planning Administrative Assistant
City of Tigard, Oregon
503.718.2438
patty(a�tiqard-or.gov
»> "Francesca " <francesca(a)soipdx.com> 10/12/07 4:45 PM »>
Patty- attached is a mailing label request. Before you finalize and print
this out I want to talk to you to make sure we have the correct properties
zsi ozcs-oo2o0
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL
DISTRICT#23J
6960 SW SANDBURG ST � � j /
TIGARD, OR 97223 /l /„ D� /�1 /� �,D�Lf2�
�f'� %%�
�
zsiozcs-ooioo ��x ���5���/S ��
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL
DISTRICT#23J
6960 SW SANDBURG ST ��1
TIGARD, OR 97223 G'j�jj/�.L'�.S
2S102BC-08700
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL
DISTRICT#23J
6960 SW SANDBURG ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
, �
��
AFFIDAVIT �F MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsforci bein� first duly sworn/affirrn, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of iI'iga , Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
;�h..4.:1�ry.��q,i�.nr t4 n�(.I Ik�G�u��
❑X NOTTC� OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR
CUP2007-00002/BROADWAY ROSE Tf-IEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATTON
(File No./Na�»c Refereoce)
� AMENDEDNOTIC�
HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE:
❑ City of Tigard Plaiuung Director
� T'igardHearingsOfficer (12/10/2007)
❑ T'igard Plannuzg Corrun�ssion
❑ Tigar-d Caty Council
A copyof the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�ibit"A",and byreference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked E�chibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on
November 19,2007,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 19,2007,postage prepaid.
i
�`�L!�l�l, r �i �%�
(Person re d Notice)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�day of 1�0�Eu�� ,2007.
OFFICIAL SEAL
SFIIRLEY L TREAT
NOTARY PUBLIC•ORECiON
r COMMISSION NO.418777
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25�2011 �Q.,"t
N TARY PUB C OF OREGON
My Comnvssion E�cpires: `f�a��<<
` EXHI
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,__ENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SL�LER
Tf-�E TTGARD DEVELOPMENTaODE REQUIRES THATIF YOUREC�IVE T�IIS N�7ITCE, ��
IT SHALI.B�.PR(�MI''11Y FOKWAKDEll TO 1I�PURQ-]ASER �
PUBLIC HEARING N4TICE
NOTTCE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETTNG ON MONDAY
DECEMBER 10, 2007 AT 7:00 PM, IN TT�E TOWN HALL OF 'THE TTGARD QVIC C�NTER AT 13125 SW
HALL BOLTI.EVARD,TIGARD,OREGON97223 WILL GONSIDERTf-�, FOLLOWING APPLICAT'ION:
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CLTP) 2007-00002
FILE TITLE: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
APPLICANT: BroadwayRose Theatre Co. APPLICANT'S ShieLs,Obletz, &Johnsen
PO Box 231004 REP.: Attn: Francesca Gambetti
Tigard, OR 97281 1140 SW 11`''Avenue,Suite 500
Portland,OR 97205
OWNER Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
6960 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard,OR 97223
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at
GF. Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposed work
includes a 2,600 square foot addition. The renovated building will be used as theatre space
and adinirustrauve offices forthe BroadwayRose Theatre.
LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S102C�, Tax Lot
100 and 2S 102BC,Tax Lot 8700.
ZONE: R 12: Medium Density Residential District. The R 12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a nununum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide
range of civic and institutional uses are also pernlitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725,
18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TF-IIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCI'ED IN ACCORDANC� WITH Tf-�E RULES OF
C��AI'T'ER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY
THE TIGARD QTY COUNQL AND AVAILABLE AT Q'I'Y HALL.
ASSISTTVE LISTEI�IING DEVIC�S ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMI'AIRED HEARING. T'HE QTY WILL
ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUAI.IFIED
BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PI.EASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOIC�) OR (503) 684-2772
(TDD- TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVIC�S FOR THE DEAF�NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING
TO MAKE ARRA.NGEMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON T�IIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITTNG
PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTTMONY MAY BE PRESEN'TED AT T'I� PUBLIC HEARING.
AT Tf-�E PUBLIC HEARING,'I'I�HEARINGS OFFIC�R WILL REC�IVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM
'I'I� QTY PLANNER,OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTTMONY. THE
HEARINGS OFFIC�R MAY CONTTNUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETTNG TO OBTAIN
ADDIT'IONAL INFORMATION OR Q.OSE THE PUBI.IC HEARING AND TAKE ACITON ON THE APPLICATTON.
IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENC� IN SUPPORT TO T�-�E APPLICATTON LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO
Tf-IE PUBLIC HEARING,ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQLJEST A CONTINUANC� OF TI� HEARING. IF THERE
IS NO CONTINUANCE GRAN'I�D AT THE HEARING,ANY PARTIQPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT
Tf-�E RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT Tf-IE
RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING(ORS 197J63(6).
INQ,UDED IN Tf-IIS NOTTC� IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO T�IE REQUEST FROM 'THE
7TGARD COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND T'�-�E TIGARD GOMI'REHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY 'IT� HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON Tf-�,SE CRITERIA AND
7'HESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT'IT� HEARING IT IS IMI'ORTANT THAT COMIVIENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST
PE1K1'A1N SPEQFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE QZITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO Tf-�E Q.OSE OF 'IT�E
HEARING ON Tf-� REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENC� SUFFIQENT TO ALLOW THE
HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPPORTUI�IITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PREQ,UDES AN APPEAL TO THE LANL)
LJSE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON'THAT ISSUE.
AT.i DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE QZITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION
AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE C�NTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR TT�E CURRENT
RATE Q-�ARGED FOR COPIES AT T�-�E TTME OF TT� REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE
HEARING,A GOPY OF'THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECITON AT NO COST,OR A COPY CAN
BE OBTAINED FOR TWEN'I'Y-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR'IT-� CURRENT RATE C�IARGED FOR COPIES AT
THE TTME OF THE REQUEST.
FOR FUR'THER INFORMATTON PLEASE CONTACT T'HE STAFF PLANNER CHERYL CAINES AT 503.639.4171,
TTGARD QT'Y HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TTGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO
cherylcCa�tigard-or.gov.
— ---- -
_ , � � —
- -�� ' m � �. � ��� ,;
��
���, '� � :. ,
-- a . ��,i'���. VICINITY MAP
- - � ���, j o,,s� e �
� �
---_ -��� L4 .. � . \��;;.�/ � ____________
. � � _����0�� � � � -.. .� y .' � �.�2007'0��02
J �/ ��� f Y' �\��T \ ~� , ��c�a BTH�EATRE YROSE
� �
,
f, � Fr.
� '�� ����``" � `_'/� ' � � � � CAFETERIA
�"�� � ���� � �� / / - � � RENOVATTON
� � �� y; � � / y' \�
//�/ ,�\�\ y '/���`a �i �i"/„ � /� `; .
/ '� -_.' \ / _ � % //�/�/��. P� . .. . .
^ / ', �///�% �`' � �,�!� LEGEND:
�
�'� :-��. %\ i�<i���- ,,, � > �� � � SUB GT
— �"^� ��/� % � ��� i ��1: �
— _�w""�.� � �/�i i. ��%% �� '� � SITE
�v / � �/ , s�`j j �2G�.�. --
� ' _� �
-- —cwwl��� � � � �
_.oEii �?—. � �7�G� �� � �� i �, '
_ _ P�.� � \��� � � / i
._ ^, ---.� � \����• �� � —�J/'-_
�_ i
_�P' �. ��) '' N
., _�P�TK$�—� PARK � �
, ST . . �� � \ / /,
, �; i �✓
— � � � —�� /;� ; � ,,� ,.-��
< — , �� ;��/ �_ � /�,�y .
�w_- __— Q',� �� / . .��! ` ..�......,.,.�
_� .�-�—..:.. �.,..��
_, �, —��— � �, >;��� � � � ,� � �,�o,��
---�� / �'—
�,� --- ._ ..-- ="_�L �__-- _1 _.—. —PIOtO�:NOV8.2007-C.OnapclAIACICA3.APR
EXHIBIT� �
BroadwayRose Theatre Co. CUP2007-00002
PO Box 231004 BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA
Tigard, OR 97281 RENOVATION
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
6960 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Shiels, Obletz, &Johnsen
Attn: Francesca Gambetti
1140 SW 11`�' Avenue, Suite 500
Portland, OR 97205
2S 102CB-07500 2S102C8-D2100
13500 PACIFIC CORP CACH FAMILY SMALL P120PERTIES LLC
BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY BY REGENCY MANAGEMENT INC
PEN510NS INC 13670 SW WRIGHTWOOD CT
21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 TIGARD,OR 97224
NORTHVILLE, MI 48167
2S7028D-02800 2S102BD-02400
AFTER FIVE LLC CAMPBELL SANDRA RAE
10330 SW TUALATIN RD 12820 SW GRANT AVE
TUALATIN, OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223
2 102 B D-02700 2S 102 C B-03400
AF R FI LLC CANTAS LLC
103 TUALATIN RD 4223 GLENCOE AVE STE#A-220
T ALATIN,OR 97062 MARINA DEL REY,CA 90292
zS1o2BC-oo115 2S1o2B�-o2201
ARBUTHNOT STEPHEN P CHALET VILLAGE LLC
7080 SW PALMER WAY TWO CENTERPOINTE DR STE 210
BEAVERTON, OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
2S102C8-06100 2S102CB-00300
ARNO�D LOURINDA J CHUNG HENRY&COMPANY
10455 SW GRANT CT BY CSK AUTO PROP MGMT
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 19063
PHOENIX,AZ 85005
2S1028C-03700 251026C-08500
BIGEJ KIMBERLY R CIMPAN SIMION
12860 SW WATKINS AVE 12750 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-01001 2S1026C-03800
BLINE RONALD G& CLIFTON ROGER F
SAGUN JUDITH L SANDRA LEE
2190 SKYLINE �R 12840 SW WATKINS
SEASIDE, OR 97138 TIGARD,OR 97223
zsioz�c-o�3oo zsio2ce-ozsoo
BRANCH MARCUS D CNL FUNDING 2000-A LP
12604 SW PATHFINDER CT PO BOX 1671
PORTLAND, OR 97223 ORLANDO, FL 32802
2 S 102 BC-0840D 102C B-02400
BURLESON STEPHEN M CN UN 2000-A LP
12740 SW WATKINS AVE PO 1671
TIGARD,OR 97223 LANDO, 32802
2S1026D-02200 2S102BC-00800
BUSCHA HELMUT AND ERIKA COLLING CHARLES
6215 SW 41 ST AVE 13835 SW HALL BLVD
PORTLAND, OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223
zsiozso-ooso� 2S102BC-04303
COLLING CHARLES W FINKE ALEX
13835 SW HALL P O BOX 23562
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028D-02000 2S102BC-043 0
COMET CORPORATION FIN X
BY WSCO PETROLEUM#225 P O 23562
2929 NW 29TH ARD,0 97223
PORTLAND, OR 97210
2S1028D-02101 2S102BC-04305
CO T CORP TION FINKE HANS C
BY WS TROLEUM#225 PO BOX 1565
292 29 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
RTLAND,OR 97210
251026D-01200 2S102BC-04307
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO FINKE HANS C&SUSAN M
PO BOX 1539 PO BOX 1565
PASO ROBLES, CA 93447 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070
2S102C8-03301 2S1028C-04300
DARROW DON S FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN&
9952 SW FREWING ST FINKE SUSAN M
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S102CB-00400 251028C-04304
ELWELL JOHN A FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN CUSTODIAN
10230 SW SCHOOL ST FOR FINKE NICHOLAS A
TIGARD, OR 97223 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
251028C-00903 2S1028C-04306
ENG TONY&CINDY L FINKE LOTTI
PO BOX 23086 HANS-CHRISTIAN
PORTLAND,OR 97281 P O BOX 23562
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-03200 251028C-04000
EWELL LANNY W&MARIAN S FLANAGAN PATRICK M&
12975 SW WATKINS AVE SCHMIDT LESLIE
TIGARD, OR 97223 10560 SW PATHFINDER
TIGARD,�R 97223
251026C-03600 2S1028C-01804
FIDLER GEORGE E JR 8 FORD JOSEPH E JULIE B
MADELINE M A PO BOX 230801
PO BOX 230794 TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97281
2S1028C-01702 2S102BC-01400
FIELD-EATON FREDERICK AND FRAZEE JOHN J JR&NOREEN L
KRISTINE E 10250 SW WALNUT 5T
12680 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102BC-00901 2S102BD-02501
FRIEDRICH SHERREE R HATCHA�OURIAN WENDY D
12805 SW GRANT AVE 12840 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028C-04100 2S102CB•00302
FURINO RICK G 8 ERIN L HELIOS PROPERTIES LLC
12760 SW WATKINS AVE 7366 SW IRON HORSE
TIGARD, OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S102C6-00900 2S102BD-01900
GARGER JERRY E HENDERSON MARILYN D HUDSON TR
13070 SW GRANT AVE 11795 SW KATHERINE ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S1028C-08100 2 102CB-03101
GEORGE ERO E HE R MARILYN D HUDSON TR
6065 165TH 1179 THERINE ST
ALOHA, OR 97007 ARD,OR 24
2S102BC-a4301 2S1026C-01808
GEORGESON THEODORE& HERNANDEZ MARIA DELUZ
GEORGESON KATHERINE 12535 SW WATKINS AVE
SUITE 110-PMB 120 TIGARD,OR 97223
14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
25102C B-06300 2 S 102C B-01200
GIBSON LORI L HESS DAVID A 8 GAIL K
10470 SW GRANT CT 13170 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2s�o2ca-osaoo 2sio2ca-aosoo
GNAU MICHAEL F 8�ANGEL S HILCHEN PAUL&LEANN
10395 SW GRANT CT 10250 SW SCHOOL ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
25102 BC-03400 2S 102C B-01600
GROAT RANDALL S 8�CAROLYN J HOLCOMBE RYAN 8 KATIE
13010 SW WATKINS 10395 SW PARK ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028D-01100 2S102C8-06200
HARDY GERALD T HOROWITZ ALAN R AND
120 RAINBOW DR PMB 2017 JUDITH BERMAN
LIVINGSTON, TX 77399 10475 SW GRANT COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-00700 2S102C8-06500
HASSEL STEVEN F&STACEY L HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
10115 SW WALNUT ST WASHINGTON COUNTY
TIGARD, OR 97223 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
2 02C8-05700 2S1028C-00300
HO G HORITY OF JOHNSON LORREN
WASHI ON COUNTY 10155 SW WALNUT ST
11 1 LIN N ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223
LLSBORO,OR 97124
102C6-06600 2S102BC-03701
HO ING HORITY OF JOHNSTON ELSIE W
WASHI ON COUNTY 12890 SW WATKINS
11 1 LIN N ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223
LSBORO,O 97124
2S102BC-07600 2S1028D-02500
HOYT ROBERT E 8 HELEN L KACHLIK-NEWBERG LLC
12735 SW WATKINS AVE 911 SW BROADWAY DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201
2S102BC-00113 2S102BD-02600
HUNT JAMES A& KIM PENNEY
JOSEPHSON SARA J 395 NW SILVERADO DR
12570 SW BROOKSIDE AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97006
TIGARD, OR 97223
2 S 102C 6-00600 2S 102 C 8-01700
HUTCHISON DENNIS E&ELKE E KIMMEL KRISTA L
10270 SW SCHOOL ST 10365 SW PARK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102 C B-00303 2 S 102C B-00700
J PATINO'S LLC KING MARLENE R
3206 NE GLISSAN 13040 SW GRANT ST
PORTLAND, OR 97232 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-01700 251028C-08000
JACKSON LINDA K KRAL GEORGE L&SARA
12670 SW WATKINS AVE 12765 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1o2BC-o2soo 2S1o2BC-o19os
JAMES ALAN K&JULIE A KRALL FRED&PATRICIA HELEN
12875 SW WATKINS AVE 12560 SW PATHFINDER CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-01101 2S103DA-00100
JARVIS MICHAEL LEE& LEPPER CHAD&MI YOUNG
DIANNA C 13060 SW WATKINS AVE
10120 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-03500 251028D-02100
JENSEN RONALD M 8 LIM KYUNG S
JENSEN ERI K 2006 SE 11TH
13000 SW WATKINS AVE PORTLAND,OR 97214
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S1026C-07500 2S102C6-07600
MARTIN DAVID K&SARAH H MORTENSEN TIM&SHANNON
12620 SW PATHFINDER CT 13155 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C6-03200 2S1028C-01100
MASSIH LLC MUMM RICHARD C
PO BOX 108 75104 STAGE GULCH RD
BEAVERTON, OR 97075 PENDLETON,OR 97801
2S102C8-07700 2S1026C-03702
MCBREEN-MCKENZIE DEBORAH L NEAL CHERYL L
12850 SW FONNER POND PL 12880 SW WATKINS
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
25102BC-02800 2S102BC-07200
MCCULLOCH GRANT H JR AND NIDAY CATHERINE R
SHIRLEY 12695 SW WATKINS ST
12905 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102C6-06400 2S102BC-07400
MCCUSKER PATRICK J AND NYDIGGER MARK A&YVONNE K
NANCY B 12630 SW PATHFINDER CT
10450 SW GRANT CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S102BC-08200 2S102CB-01100
McDOWELL DEANNA L O'CONNOR S CASEY
12745 SW WATKINS 13150 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102 BC-04400 2S 102C B-02300
MEERMANS MARY L PACIFIC PROPERTIES
10605 SW WATKINS PL BY MARTIN JOHNSON
TIGARD, OR 97223 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-03100 2S102C6-06700
MIDAS PROPERTIES INC PACIFIC PROPERTIES GENERAL
REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING DEPT PARTNERSHIP
1300 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY
ITASCA, IL 60143 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C6-00800 2S1026C-03900
MIRANDA PEDRO& PALM JULIE C
SOFIA 12820 SW WATKINS AVE
12255 SW GREENBURG RD#17 TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND, OR 97281
2S102CB-03302 2S1026D-00904
MORRISON LACY A PELLETIER PHILIP
9950 SW FREWING CT 8835 SW BELL FLOWER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S1028D-00905 2S1026C-00114
PELLETIER PHILIP S ROSINSKI BARBARA E&
8835 SW BELLFLOWER LN AMLER SUSAN M
TIGARD, OR 97224 16307 SW 108TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S102CB-02000 2S1026C-00701
PETTIJOHN PAUL SAMUELS ROBERT C ROBIN R
25710 E BRIGHT AVE 8735 SW LEHMAN ST
WELCHES, OR 97067 PORTLAND,OR 97223
2S103DA-00200 2S102CB-03500
PHILLIPS WILLIAM C SANDSTROM GLENN M&MARGERY A
PO BOX 3642 9405 SW PALOUSE LN
TUALATIN, OR 97062 TUALATIN,OR 97062
2S1026C-01803 2S102BC-00900
PHILLIPS WILLIAM C&LOIS J SCHULZE LLOYD&EVELYN FAMILY T
20209 SW COMANCHE TER BY LLOYD H S�EVELYN M SCHULZE TRS
TUALATIN, OR 97062 8780 SW INDIAN HILL LN
BEAVERTON,OR 97008
2S102CB-03504 251026C-03300
POPAT KAUSHIK L& SEINWERTH DANIEL TODD&
BINA S THERESA MARIE
6783 PASEO SAN LEON 13035 SW WATKINS AVE
PLEASANTON, CA 97566 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C6-03401 2S102CB-05900
PRITCHARD ANTON B SHEA JAMES C JR&
10045 SW GARRET ST SUSAN K
TIGARD, OR 97223 10405 SW GRANT CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-01701 2S1028D-03200
QADIR RASHEED SHULER GARY
6301 SW PALATINE#A28 30790 NE FERNWOOD
PORTLAND, OR 97219 NEWBERG,OR 97132
2S1026C-01102 2S102C6-03501
RESHEY MARILYN REV LIV TRUST SORENSEN BROCK
BY MARILYN LEE RESHEY TR 20 WALKING WOODS DR
10160 SW WALNUT ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S1026C-02400 251026C-04302
RIZZUTTO CLYDE ALLEN SPRINGER-GEORGESON KATHERINE&
JULIE ANN GEORGESON THEODORE
12805 SW WATKINS 14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR
TIGARD, OR 97223 SUITE 110-PMB 120
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
251026C-01802 2S102BC-01600
ROBINSON JEREMY J &LISA M STEVENSON THOMAS J/LAURI C
12615 SW WATKINS AVE 12660 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C B-07200 2S1028C-01500
SUBRAMANIAN LAXMANPRAKASH& TINSLEY FRANK 8 VICKY
ADINARAYANAN SASIKALA 10270 SW WALNUT ST
10441 SW PARK 5T TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CA-01300 25102CB-03000
SUSNJARA MARKO A/BETTY M TRAIN ARTHUR&
16225 NE EUGENE CT CLINE MARY E
PORTLAND, OR 97230 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CB-01000 2S1028D-02900
SWEET JEFF TRUCK TERMINALS
13130 SW GRANT AVE 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY
PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97229
2S1028C-01800 2S1026D-03000
SWINFORD CLARK H& TRUCK TERMINALS INC
AMANDA K 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY
10330 SW WALNUT ST PORTLAND,OR 97229
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-00902 2S1028C-01805
TAYLOR JEFF R TUCK KARRY 8 VALERIE G
1278a SW CREEKSHIRE DR 12540 SW PATHFINDER CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2sio2ac-oieo� 2S102BC-01200
THOMAS MARC C&CAROL A WALP GEORGIA J
10360 SW WALNUT ST 10200 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2 S 102C 8-02301 2S 102C B-02600
TIGARD MEDICAL CENTER WALTERANGELA D
13200 SW PACIFIC HWY 2863 RIVERWALK LP
TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97401
2S7026C-08700 2 102C8-03300 .
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL WA ER ELA D
DISTRICT#23J 286 RWALK LP
6960 SW SANDBURG ST GENE, 97401
TIGARD,OR 97223
102C8•00100 2S102CB-02700
TI RD-TU TIN SCHOOL WA R A LA D
DIST 23J 2863 R WALK LP
6960 NDBURG ST E NE,O 401
ARD, OR 7223
2S 2C8-00200 2S102BC-08300
TIGA D-TUA TIN SCHOOL WALTERS DONALD
DISTRI 3J 12730 SW WATKINS AVE
6960 NDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223
T ARD, OR 7223
2 S 102 B D-02300
WATSON RONALD A&
CLAUDIA A WATSON TRUST
4359 NW TAM O-SHANTER WAY
PORTLAND, OR 97229
2S102C6-01901
WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP
PO BOX 23408
EUGENE, OR 97402
2Sio28C-ooio2
WEEKS CHERREE L&
WINTER RAVEN E
12595 SW BROOKSIDE AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S1o26C-o25o0
WILSON CLARENCE A AND
BETTY L
12831 SW WATKINS
TIGARD, OR 97223
102C6-07800
WI M ERRACE OWNERS OF
ALL
2s�o2eC-o��oo
WOLFORD WILLIAM K&NANCY RUTH
12687 SW WATKINS ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-00200
WOODARD CHARLES L ARLIE
10215 SW WALNUT AVE
PO BOX 23303
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-07900
W DARD ARLES L ARLIE
1021 ALNUT
PO 303
T ARD, OR 7223
2 S 102 C B-06000
WOOLLETT THOMAS S
12700 SW 231 ST PL
HILLSBORO,OR 97123
2S102BC-01300
ZIGLIHSKI E PATRICIA
REVCABLE LIVING TRUST
BY E PATRICIA ZIGLINSKI TR
10230 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223
.� ._
Brooks Gaston
3206 Princess
Edinburg, TX 78539
Don & Dorothy Erdt
13760 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ellen Beilstein
14630 SW 139�h Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Martha Bishop
10590 SW Cook Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Vanessa Foster
13085 SW Howard Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Susan Beilke
11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
Patricia Keerins
12195 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136th Place
Tigard, OR 97224
fITV AC TIGAR(1 _ fGIJTGAI IWTLRLCT[fl DAGTI[C !�•�.-��..,i.,��o+��..�i�tioi��rir�o„+��i .�.,.-� i ionn�rGn� �2nn�„_n�
� t
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
L �
I, Patricia L. Lttnsford,being first dulysworn/affirm,on oath depose and saythat I am an Administrative Assistant forthe
City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the followuig:
;<h,.k.�,np�ure I1n(sl Bebw-
❑X NOTTC� OF FINAL ORDER FOR
CUP2007-00002/BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATTON
(File No.�Nar,�e Rerecence)
� AMENDEDNOTICE
HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE:
❑ Ciry of Tigard Plancung Director
� Tigard Hearings Officer (12/10/2007)
❑ Tigard Plaruiuig Corrurussion
❑ 7"igard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on
December 19,2007, and deposited in the United States Mail on December 19,2007,postage prepaid.
�� ,
G(� � �ii �
(Peison ared N ' e
STATE OF OREGON
Coun�y of Washington ss.
City of Tigard �
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the l� f dayof ���l�-� ,20Q� ��
OFFlCIAL SEAL � ��
SHIRLEII L TREAT
NOTARY PUBLIC-oaEOOrr NO ARY PUB C OF OREGO�
COMM�ssioN NO.4tem M Coirunission E ires: ���'/,
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 25,2011 Y �
� 12G DAYS =2/19/2008 (Includes � - �iay extension, EXH 1 B IT..�
DATE OF FILING: 12/18/20G, a
DATE MAILED: 12/19/2007 =
CITY OF TIGARD
Washington County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CLJI' 2007-00002
Case Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
Applicant's Name/Address: Broadwa Rose Theatre Co. PO Box 231004 Ti ard OR 97281
Owner's Name/Address: Ti ard-Tualatin School District 23 6960 SW Sand Street Ti ard OR 97223
Address of Propeny: 12850 SW CGrant Avenue Ti ard Ore on 97224
Tax Ma /Loc Nos.: Wa. Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S 102C�,Tax Lot 100 &2S 102BC,T�Lot 8700.
A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING 'THE FACfS, FINDINGS AND CONQ.LJ�IONS APPROVING A RE�UEST FOR
A CONDITIONAL L1SE. T'HE QTY OF TTGARD HEARINGS OFFIC�R HAS REVIEWED 'I� APPLICANT'S PLANS,
NARRA7TVE, MATERIALS, COMNIENTS OF REVIEWING AGENQES, TT�E PLANNING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT
AND RECOMNIENDA7TONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN 1� STAFF REPORT.
THE HEARINGS OFFIC�R HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 10, 2007 TO REC�,IVE TESTIMONY
REGARDING T�IIS APPLICA7TON. 1'�-IIS DEC�SION HAS BEEN BASED ON TT� FACI'S, FINDINGS AND
CONQ,USIONS CONTAINED WITF--IIN TI--IIS FINAL ORDER
Request: ➢ The applicant requested approval of a Conditional Use Pemut to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium and
construct a 2,600 s quare foot addition co the e�cisting C.F. Tigard Elementary School. The applicant will use the
renovated area as a theater space and adnunistrative otfices. The a�plicant is also expanding the existing parking and
access drive and providing additional landscaping. The site contauls about 8.9 acres. At the December 10, 2007
public hearing, the Hearings Officer held the record open for one week. On December 13, 2007, the parties
reached an agr�eement; therefore, the Hearings Officer closed the record on December 13, 2007 and approved
this request, subject to the conditions of approval contained within this final order. Staff recommended
Condition of approval#24 was modified to reflect the parties' agreement and #25 was deleted.
Zone: R 12: Medium-Densiry Residential District. A��licable Review Criteria: Commuruty Development Code Chapters
18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested 0 �lpproval with Conditions ❑ Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
❑x Owners of Record within the Required Distance x❑ Affected Government Agencies
0 Interested Parties ❑x The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Plaruiing Division/Community Development
Department at the City of Tigard Permit Center at City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 19,2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON ANUARY 5, 2008 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Ap peal:
The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with
standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2.
of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the re quired fee
shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON ANUARY 4, 2008.
Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
� V
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Regarding an application by Broadway Rose Theater Co.for �F I N A L O R D E R
a conditional use pernut for a theater space and administrative )
offices in the existing C.F. Tigard ElementarySchool at ) CUP2007-00002
12850 SW Grant Avenue in the Cityof Tigard, Oregon )(Broadway Rose Theater)
A. SLJMMARY
1. Francesca Gainbetti filed the application for BroadwayRose Theater Company
(the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use pernlit to renovate a
cafeteria/auditorium and construct a 2,600 square foot addition to the existing C.F. Tigard
Elementary School at 12850 SW Grant Avenue; also known as t�lot 100 WCTM 2S102C�
and taY lot 8700 WCITVI 2S102BC(the "site"). The applicant will use the renovated area as a
theater space and adininistrative offices. The applicant also proposed to expand the existing
parking and access drive and to provide additional landscaping. The site contains about 8.9
acres and is zoned R-12. Additional basic f acts about the site and surrounding land and
applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated
November 30,2007 (the " Staff Report"), incorporated herein byreference.
2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer") conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter.At the public
hearing, Citystaff recommended conditional approval of the application.Representatives of
the applicant testified in support of the application. Other than service providers, no one
testified orally or in writing.Disputed issue in this case include:
a. Whether the applicant is required to provide a buffer along the entire
north boundary of the site;
b. Whether the applicant is required to install fencing around on-site trees
located away f rom the construction area; and
c. Whether,and to what eatent,the applicant is required dedicate right of way
along the site's School Street frontage.
3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof
for a conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and
incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order.
B. HEARING AND RECORD
1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on December 10,2007 to
receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list,
materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the
hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings
officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any
c�x parte contacts, bias or conf licts of interest. The f ollowing is a summary by the hearings
officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing.
2. Cityplanner Cheryl Caines surrunarized the Staff Report and corrected
typographical errors.
a. She requested the hearings officer delete conditions 3.E, and 7. She noted
that the applicant included a bicycle parking detail he plans submitted with the application.
Therefore she requested the hearings officer delete the finding and condition regarding this
issue at page 20 of the Staff Report. She requested the hearings officer modifycondition 24
to requu-e that the applicant increase the right of way of School Street to 17 f eet f rom the
centerline, rather than 10 feet as listed in the Staff Report. She testified that the access
standards are met. Therefore she requested the hearings officer delete the finding and
condition regarding access at page 14 of the Staff Report.
b. She noted that the landscape buffer requirements of the Code are based
on the proposed uses of the site and abutting properties. In this case the proposed theater is
a commercial use abutting e�sting residential uses to the north. Therefore a landscape buffer
is required along the entire north boundary,even where no parking i� proposed. The existing
parking lot on the north of the site limits the applicant's abilityto provide a landscape buffer.
The applicant proposed to install slats in the e�cisting cyclone fence in order to enhance the
existing buffer to the rn�imum extent feasible without modifying the e�sting parking lot.
The applicant will install slatted fencing and additional trees and shrubs in the remainder of
the buffer along the north boundaryof the site.
c. She opined that the proposed theater will not generate noise that is
detectable offsite. The applicant hired an acoustical engineer to assist in the design of the
theater and lirrut noise impacts on the theater. The noise mitigation will also prevent theater
noise from impacting adjacent properties. The applicant did not propose to conduct any
outdoor activities on the site. However patrons congregating in the parking lot and outside
the lobby before and after performances maygenerate some noise. Therefore the conditions
of approval require that the applicant provide surrounding residents with a phone number to
contact the theater and report any noise problems that arise. This will allow the applicant to
take steps to limit any actual noise impacts that occur.
d. She agreed with the applicant's request to defer submission of lighting and
rooftop equipment screening plans to prior to issuance of inechanical and electrical pernuts,
rather than prior to issuance of building pernuts.
e. She argued that tree protection is warranted for all of the trees on the site.
Although some of the trees are located away f rom the proposed construction,they could be
impacted by construction vehicle parking and maneuvering, equipment and material storage
and other construction activities.
3. Planner Francesca Gambetti, architect Tun Ayersman and anistic director Sharon
Maroney testif ied f or the applicant.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Ojf cer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 1
a. Ms. Gambetti accepted the findings and conditions in the Staff Report
with certain exceptions.
i. She requested the hearings officer modifyconditions of approval 1
and 5 to allow the applicant to submit a lighting plan and rooftop equipment screening plan
as part of the mechanical and electrical permits, rather than prior to issuance of building
perniits.
u. She argued that tree protection is not warranted for all of the trees
on the site. The site is very large. Many of the trees are located away from the proposed
development and will not be impacted by construction activities.
iu. She argued that a 54-foot right of wayis not warranted on School
Street. Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC") Table 18.810.1 requires a 54-foot right of wayfor
local streets carrying up to 1500 vehicles per day. School Street is a short dead-end street that
will carry less than 200 vehicles per day. Therefore a 46-foot right of way is warranted per
TMC Table 18.810.1. She requested the hearings officer modify condition 24 to allow the
applicant to dedicate seven feet of additional right of way and create a restrictive covenant
for the remaining six feet of right of way and for the cul-de-sac turnaround.
iv. She requested the hearings officer hold the record open for one
week to allow the applicant,the property owner (the Tigard-Tualatin School District) and
City staff to discuss options for the dedication of right of way on School Street abutting the
site.
b. Mr. Ayersman argued that a landscape buffer is not warranted along the
entire north boundary of the site. Parking is only proposed along a portion of the north
boundary of the site.
4. City engineer Kun McMillan argued that the applicant should be requu-ed to
dedicate a m�n;mum seven feet of right of way on School Street. The applicant may establish
a covenant for the remaining ten feet of right of way and the cul-de-sac turnaround. The City
cannot approve a smaller street without evidence from an engineer that the street complies
with the standards for"skinnystreets" in TMC Figure 18.810.5.B. The 46-foot right of way
proposed by the applicant would prohibit parking on School Street,which would have a
significant impact on residents of the adjacent apartment development.
7. At the end of the hearing the hearings officer held the record open for one week
to allow the applicant,the property owner and City staff to discuss options for the
dedication of right of way on School Street abutting the site.
a. During the open record period the parties reached an agreement as
reflected in the December 13, 20071etter from Kelly Hossaini,the attorney for the Tigard-
Tualatin School District. Therefore the hearings officer closed the record upon receipt of
this letter.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Ojficer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 3
C. DISCUSSION
1. The Staff Reporc identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and
applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards
identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the
facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the
proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and
adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are
submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will
prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the
requirements of the TMC. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the
Staff Report, as modified, as his own.
2. The Cit�s buffer matri�c, TMC Table 18.745.1, requires screening and buffering
based on the use proposed on the site and the existing uses on abutting properties.In this
case the applicant proposed to develop a theater, a commercial use, adjacent to e�sting
residential uses. Therefore TMC Table 18.745.1 requires a Type D buffer along the entire
north boundary of the site, including those areas that are not developed as a parking lot. As
noted in the Staff Repon,the e�cisting parking lot precludes the installation of a full
landscape buffer along a portion of the north boundary. The hearings officer finds that the
proposed buffer is adequate in this section until the School District proposes additional
modifications to the e�sting parking lot.
3. The hearings officer finds that tree protection is warranted for all of the trees on
the site. As Ms. Caines noted at the hearing, construction vehicle parking and maneuvering,
equipment and material storage and other construction activities could impact unprotected
trees on the site. The applicant may be able to provide the required tree protection by
fencing off portions of the site rather than installing fencing around individual trees.
However the final tree protection plan should be subject to City approval.
4. The applicant agreed to dedicate sufficient additional right of wayalong the site's
School Street frontage to provide a 25-foot half-width right of way,elinunating the need for
a restrictive covenant. Condition of approval 24 should be modified to that effect and
condition 25 should be deleted.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order,the
hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use pernzit does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local,state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 4
E. DECISION
In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating
the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter,the hearings
officer hereby approves CL1P2007-00002 (Broadway Rose Theater), subject to the following
conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BLIILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e amm�g epartment C ery Caines, 639-4171,e�rt. 2437 or revrew
and approval:
1. Prior to building pernzit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
review and approval showuig the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for
review and approval that shows the following pnor to site pernut issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer nuuung along the nonhern property,except where the
existuig parking area prohibits installation.
D. Locauon of and screciung for the proposed gas meter.
3. Prior to site pennit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise
waste hauler uldicatuig that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their
requirements.
4. Prior to issuance of site pernZits,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan
showing four accessible parking spaces as requu-ed bythe 2004 Oregon Structural
Specialty Code.
5. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Planning and Engineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees
and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibitin equipment,vehicles, machinery, grading, dumping,
storage, burial of�ebris,or any other construction-related activities ul any
tree protection zone; and
C. A note statulg that onlythose trees identified on the approved Tree Removal
plan are authorized f or removal by this report. Notwithstanduig any other
�rov�sion of this title, any parry found to be in violation of this chapter
18.790]pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be
subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be re qwred to remedy any
dama e caused by the violation. Such remediation shaIl include, but not be
limite�to,the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged
trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development
Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the
estimated value of any unlawfullv removed or damaged tree, as deternuned
using the most current International Societyof Arboriculture's Guide for
Plant Appraisal.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 5
6. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by
the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an
inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the
tree protection to verifythat the tree protection measures are perforniing adequately.
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibilityto ensure that the Project
Arbonst has submitted written reports to the Caty Arbonst, at least once every two
weeks, as the ProJ�e�c�t Arborist morutors the construction activities f rom initial tree
pr�otection zone (TI'Z) fencing installation through the building construction phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condition and location of the tree protection fencing,
detenrune �f any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protection
Plan has been violated.If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not
being followed bythe contractor or a sub-contractor,the Citycan sto�p work on the
pro�ect unt�l an ins ection can be done by the City Arbonst and the Isroject Arborist.
I'rior to �ssuance o�any Certificates of Occupan�c y,the Project Arborist will submit a
f inal certif ication indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were f ollowed
and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified
growing environment.
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone,the project arborist
shall�repare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and
the ely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
CityArborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The
City Arborist may reqwre chan es prior to approval. The pro�ect arborist shall be on
site while work is occurruig wrt�the tree protection zone and subrrut a suiYUnary
report certifyin�that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly
unpact the health and/or stabiliry of the trees.
9. Prior to issuance of building pernzits,the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were preserved,the location of tree rotection fencing.
B. Subirut a statement and�sig nature o�approval from a certified arborist
regarding building and intrastructure situ-ig techniques to be employed in
construction�nth respect to any protected trees on site.
10. Prior to issuance of site pernzits,the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
Submit to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
11. Prior to issuance of a site perniit, a Public Faciliry Improvement (PFI) permit is
required f or this project to cover street im�provements and any other work in the
public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be
subrrutted for review to the Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are in
addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and shouId onl include
sheets relevant to publ�c unprovements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI�pernzit
plans shall conform to Catyof Ti ard Public Improvement Design Standards, which
are ava�lable at City Hall and the�t�s web page �www.tigard-or.gov).
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 6
1?. The PFI pernut plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and
telephone number of the u-idividual or corporate entity who will be designated as the
"Perrruttee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the p�ub�lic
improvements. For example, specify if the entiry u a corp oration,Zunited
partnership, LLC,etc. Also spec�fy�the state within which the entity is incorporated
and provide the name of the corporate contact�person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department wiil delayprocessuzg of project
documents.
13. Final design plans and calculations for the pro osed private water quality faciliry shall
be submitted to the Engineenng Department �Kim McMillan) as a pan of the Public
Facility Improvement (I'FI) pernut plans. Included with the plans shall be a
proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan.
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement
(PFI) pennit drawuigs. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and
Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,February 2003 edition."
15. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Pernut issued by the City of Tigard
pursuant to ORS 468.740 an t e Fe era ean Water Act.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS:
Su mit to e amm�g epartment C ery ines, 639-4171, ext. 2437 or review
and approval:
16. Prior to building pernut issuance the ap�plicant shall submit plans that indicate the
location of all rooftop eqwpment and the gas meter.
17. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the app licant shall submit for review and
approval a revised site plan showuig the areas illuminated bythe proposed and
ewstuig lighting.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BLTILDING INSPECTION:
Su mit to t e amm�g epartment ery ines, 639-4171, ext. 2437 or review
and approval:
18. Prior to placement of any signs on site,the ap licant shall apply for a si n permit and
supp1y staff v�nth the appropnate plans to ve�ycompliance with TDC�apter
18.780.
19. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the
effect that any existu-ig tree greater than 6 inches diameter may_be removed only if
the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restnction
may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with
this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
20. Prior to final building inspection,the app licant shall contact the Staff Planner, Cheryl
Caines, 639-4171,e�. 2437 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be
complete per approved plans.
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Off cer Final Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) Page 7
Submit to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for
review and approval:
21. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the water
quality/detention facility and any work in the publ�c right-of-way(or public
easement) and obtain approval from the Enguleenng Department.
22. Prior to a final building inspection,the one-way traffic flow markings shall be
installed at the driveways as shown on Sheets A1.02 and C2.1.
23. Additional right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage_of SW
School Street to increase the right-of-wayto 25 feet from the centerline.The
description shall be tied to the e�r.isting nght-of-way centerline. The dedication
document shall be on Cityforn�s. Instructions are ava�lable from the Engineering
Department.
24. To ensure compliance with C1ean Water Services design and construction standards,
the aPplicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and
specitications of the pnvate water quaht��facilityto perform construction and visual
observation of the water quality facility for comphance wrth the design and
specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at
completion of the construction. Prior to final building uls ection, the design
engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Engineenng staf�with written confu-mation
that the water quality faciliry�s m comphance with the design and specifications.
FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S
DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID.
DATED this 18�h day of December 2007.
Joe Turner,Esq., AIQ'
Ciryof Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP2007-00002 Hearings Officer Fina!Order
(Broadway Rose Theater) page g
--- -- ----
j�i�I � �q�rov � �-/, ,� �,, - i �� _ �/o�\ �,;�/;` -- - � � � /,- - •
;�
� / , �� , / . ,
,
�1 ' � � ���� L� �r �� . :l � � i > I _eocar.u„ c �r, � rno.rior+ svsreM
;j ; ;--� % � °o � o \��� � % � VICINIT�' MAP
; � �,
'' ' ~ � ' � "����� �
�� i-i' ��v,� �i '�'��'\/a � �
i i��! Y -
'� I -====_______
�-I�-, �------- ��' -- '
� j � ,� / ���0�� / I CLTP2��7-����2 ;
, , �, �� ____________ �
�—' i ; PP�` BROADWAY ROSE
► � � � � �T � ��tiz,� THEATRE
! , -� � CAFETERIA
P '� RENOVATION '
-� �, '� ;I
, ;
�� ��� ��� � �� ��� i
�
� �
� A� ��
� \ P� � � ,I LEGEND: ;
�-- ���� � ���
suBJECr
wATK�NS pC SITE j
� �9�� '
\ G>. ' -..�,;, --�,.i i
\ � ���' ,r- � � j
G�nNT � s��� - -� ,! I I
_ E�L T CtT y � - . - �I
� 4'� ..
I �� �a.7 RL'�.I ��.• ' -.,.i.,. ..i i !
� I ��gcHO iiG. / .nJ'�i._ �: . � I
/ F�� � �
2� j �'�_ I ;
� ,
�L Tigard Area Map s I i
� �'�' N i
I
PARK ST PARK gT 'I o eo ,eo z�o sso aso Fee� �
�
��� 1"=366 feet j
W i
�
Q
, 1
COOK LN ��`G
I ^Q" / Information on Ihis map is lor general localion only and j
�� �/ should�e verified with the Development Services Oivisian. i
13125 SW Hall Blvd �
� I
.�-' Z � � n TigarO,OR 97223
Y I �,:. �.,� � \ / / ` (503)639-477t
� � ,
I r --i-_ / � � ' \ , A ` �' � � �, hitp://www_ci.tigard ocus i
----� ----------- - — --- �-�=—�=-----��-'-�--- -=------ — �-—�=—---��-�---=
;ommunity Development Plot date: Nov 6,2007;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
� `�� ,� 1�--�
_ � � ,-�°=�s�°'9- —�
�-�� = -� � .._,..�A_. -..—,_
Q � + �i, 11',O `=�2t.=—�':�,W ..�r.�.,,._A.�.,. �
4_� ��L ��� � ::2 ''r �awaesne�.. -
- �� �. � T'a� �'r� ��
� ,
U
� � � ..�..�.�...�a�.. �
_ � � _ ��� . ;'"'� �..,...�.. eooeaa�oM,�
_,,,.� �� "pwtEC�v�
J � � W'
_ ,�� � ,�, � � �' _ p :.;:�r a- �'.�.
f� ', - .'� o°� �s,^�^
' � _�_ _ � 0 s-,.�c:�°. .�:...�
� j �..0 �1..�.,�.....�.,.....� lo�
� ` � - _ ,- �-.�_�...p W
:; =���.�� Q
� � � #� �. ��T�-r�,:��-- �
� _
o , � � Q,a.
�— � '�f � ��_.....��., \
., : . ' . .. `, «.
�-^--r-�
o-
. � � . _ . • � d.a�
;�: °� ._�A.� �
- o ���� 3
�� � � _ � - �»�.A - o
.� �� - � , � ;�_:���a �
Q ��p .�_..... Q
� � b )���"°'p�
O O � O � j-•� -°-_._ �
. � � . i A�� Os �'_�ar�er��w�j �
_ . �-: � � g� -�..� ; W
p° �'�-� ° _ � � ,� ` � � ��=�":,��,. �
�o �.. � � ;� � �
� g;. � ° � � �_�.--___..�. �
,� �
� . � - - . _ - —
_ - �.o.�„o�
i � � - `J� � ' ;�' a .�.^ - i
- ' ' o ', -- - . -_ . � �.�...o----
� � , �� - - '� - �t °�f ��� .__ T �.=�,�;4+
\ �� � �� a �� ° �i j 'o I, ..,_.�.�,._s..� ,�.
�� � - ��� � o� E� ���.��� � � � - _._.. ._
� 'A ' i �O � D � � M ,f � j � ���°`�..'.o+�n� ar nr
Or .' = ,p � A..o."��¢,�..�..f�n�w
o' 4 � � t 3 , _ _..��n `���'
� , -_-_ O p �.:���.._�� :.
� ' � � � - :��`;�:.^'��
�'o<
�� �O � � NORTM ,��� �1��p�S�'
! � 18fTE PL.AN�l../1lJ�CAPE PL.AN - " — � .._...._....�.s-_� nm,
A1.02
,
EXH I B 1T��--
BroadwayRose Theatre Co. CiJP2007-00002
PO Box 231004 BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE C,AFETERIA
Tigard, OR 97281 RENOVATION
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
6960 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Shiels, Obletz, &Johnsen
Attn: Francesca Gambetti
1140 SW 11`''Avenue, Suite 500
Ponland, OR 97205
Kelly S. Hossaini
Miller Nash,LLP
3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower
111 SW Fifth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204-3699
��- w��NUT T o � ���� . �'� � � � �
S" _ �'pO �1.�. � " / � ' GEf1GRA�HI(; iNFOHMAiION SVSTEM
`�. O oo��� . VICINITY MAP
c�n � � � �- �'�'f'�,i� �F� ,bo���� �
� ,� � T ------------
�
\�o��G �. � , .,\ CUP2007-00002
pP��� � `���ti�T ��� BROADWAY ROSE
�/'� �� �ti�,� 'I�EATRE
�y�. �. % CAFETERIA
,� � � j��� ���, RENOVA'TION
�� �� s�'
P���� � ST �� I
� >
i --� � � ��'�, ,� �
� � ' �� � � LEGEND:
- � � � �
P
� � . � ' � � � sUBJECT
`"ATKINS P j SITE
C /
TH ,�I —� �9�,L Q�,
� �--��� �'�, _�<s F �
� i �� ,�� ,
�
I� . . . �� . fE�' _._ � _ `�
'�P � �
GRANT �P� s�� . .�� ' -
DELL CT CT G ,l �,JR��',, '
� i,� l,� � °� �'
�,
� . � - �'���IRCMT K0. _ PV,_.. L .. _
(� � — � . �BONRq
� � _ __— I' "� '\ . . I T/ nURHA��
/JC\
�
2� � ' � � �� � ��
�
� Tigartl Area Map
, �� � F�i�c � N
I�_
, y ��
PARK ST �
- PA , � a F
RK , . . .. 0 90 80 2 0 360 50 eet
— _ ST
.� � � � �' — — —
1"=366 feet
I \ -
�
W n
Q
! � �
i COOK W ���
� G�
QQ� \ ��� � � Information on this map is for general bcation only aM
_r ,_ Y . . . should be ve�ed wiih the Development Services Divisbn.
, �\ I I i Z .� ' \ /, _\,`� O 13125 SW Hall Blvd
1 �v � Tigard,OR 97223
� Y .. '� P.� � (503)639�171
� - � H . � � � http:!lmvw.ci.tigard.or.us
Community Development Plot date: Nov 6,2007;C:ImagiclMAGIC03.APR
� CI � f OF TIGARD .
CO1��LMUNITY = OREGON
SPAPEI�S � � �
6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222• PO PUBLIC HEARING 1TEM:
Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269 I hc t'ullo��ing will be considered by the Tigard Hearin_gs Otl�icer on
Phone: 503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Mondav December 10 2007 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center
Email: legals@commnewspapers.com -Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon. Both public
oral and written testimony is invited.
The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance
AF F I DAV I T O F P U B LI CATI O N �'�th the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted
by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure
State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writ-
� ing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hear-
I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, ing only. Failure to ra�se an issue m person or by letter at some
depose and say that I am the Accounting point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements
Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, or evidence sufficient to afford the dec�s�on-maker an opportunity
Tualatin & Sherwood , a news a er of to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of
� p p Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the
general circulation, published at Beaverton, in Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a
the aforesaid county and state, as defined by comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion.
ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submit-
ted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are
City of Tigard available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will
CUP 2007-00002 be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days
TT11056 prior to the hearing,and copies for all items can also be provided
at a reasonable cost.
Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division
a copy of which is hereto attached, was �staff contact: Cheryl Caines) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,
published in the entire issue of said Oregon 97223,by calling 503-639-4171,or by e-mail to cher Ic
newspaper for tigard=or.gov.
� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP)2007-00002
weeks in the following issues - BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION -
iVovember 22, 2007 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval
to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at C.E Tigard Elementary
School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre. Proposeei
work includes a 2,600 square foot addition. The renovated build-
ing will be used as theatre space and administrative offices for
the Broadway Rose Theatre. LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant
C�n � �O�j�p �/�"`.'`/.l-� Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S 102CB,
« �� � Tax Lot 100 and 2S 102BC,Tax Lot 8700. ZONE: R-12:Medium-
Charlotte Allsop (AccOUnting Manager) Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed
to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot
November 22, 2007 size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional
uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REV�FW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330,
( 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18,765, 18.780,
� `� C,��C�'V 18.790, 18.795 and 1 R.810. Publish 11/22/2007 TT 11056 �
M commission ex ires I ��'?� \ � � / V �`" \ � /� �a-;_�Z-- �
NOTARY UBLIC FOR OREGON ^�- �n�
Y P T ��,� / amoc
��� G�V�i�� ' � \'� ♦.�-] ��'�/� BTH��YRO6E�
1 CAFETEAIA
/,� RFVOVA710N
��� �� � � �
Acct#10093001 � °���� � �
Patricia Lunsford/Attn:Acctg. � I � �, � `��°:��� ���
City of Tigard �" '°` �- �
13125 SW Hall Blvd. � �`` "
Tigard, OR 97223 " �����
, �- ,� '�""�--x
Size:2 x 10.25 -^—� ', � —- „— -
Amount Due $171.17 ;`-�r -
'Remit to address above _. � ,
_ - �
OFFICIAL SEAL -;� +� ` �'�"" '
SUZEITE I CURRAN � !-- - ' ,� ��.�
NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
COMMISSION N0.373063
MYCOMMISSION IXPIRES NOV.28,2007
YRE�APP.HSI D BY:
CITX OF TI�ARD PLANNING DIVISION
.
�� L,AND USE PE�iMIT APPLICATION
r
G'ry of Ti�ZrdPerrrrz C',au,er 13125 SWHaII Blu�, Ti� QR 97223
Phare' S03.639.4171 F�c:503.598.1960
File!! � ,�a'�-p�v0, O�her Casc N
Date � � By � �� Reccipt k -��3� �"7(� Pcc 5.�4 _°� Date Complcte �
TYP� OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑ Adjusut�endVuiance(T or In ❑Minor Land Putirion(1� ❑Zone Changc (II� I
❑Comprehensive Plan A�ndment(T� [�Planned Developm�nc(III) ❑ Zone Change Annexaaon(I�
�Condicional CJse(IIn ❑�ensitive Lands�teview(T,II or II� ❑ zone Oidi.narue Amendment(T� �
❑�coric�verlay(lI or III) ❑Sir,e Development Review(Ln .
❑Ybme Occupation(In ❑ Subdivuion(II or III�
: a
12850 SW GRA�fT STREET, TIGARD, OR 97223
25102CB0100 & 2S102CB08700
383,100 SF . R-12
3h0ADWAY ROSE 7HEATRE COMPANY
PO BOX 231004, TIGARD, OR 97281
503-603-9862 503-670-8512
�
FRAyCESCA GAMBETTI 503-242-0084
E� A[tac mnte ooe ''
TIGARD-TUALATIIti SCHOOL DISTRICT Z3J
A
b950 S�iJ SANDaURG STREtT, TIGARa, OR 97223
503-431-4007
� en the owner and thc applicant axe diffcnnt people,the applican�must be the putrhaser of record or a]essee in possession�ith wrirten
authorizarion from thc owner or an agcnt of the owner. The ownc� awst sign tlus application in the space provided on the back of�his form
or submit a written audiorizauon with this a licauon.
„'` 5�" This pro�osal i5 to renovate the old cafeteri�/auditorium at CF Tigard
Elemen��ry School to accommodate the Broadway Rose Theatre C�. The existing 10,b00 SF buiidir,!
will be renovQted a��d a n�w lobby and sc��e shop will expa�d it to i3,200 SF. Prelirr.i;��r}' plc��
for �thz projec'E ir�clude a thea�tre space with 235 p�rmanent s°a�s , of'Fice space for 6
administrativ� s�taff Gnd 93 p�rking spaces (31 already existing) .
APPLICATIONS Vi�IL� NOT BE ACCEPTED WlTT-IOUT ALL OF 7HE REQUTAED SUBMITTAL �,LEME,NTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BRSIC SUBMITTAL REQUIR�.MEMS"INFORMATION SHEE7.
c\curpin\maste�\land use applicauons\]and use permi�app.doc
THE APPLICAN`T SHALL (�RTIPY THA�':
♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the tern,s and
subject to all the conditions and limirauons of the approval.
♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith, are
true; and the applican�s so acknowledge that anypermit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is
found that anysuch statemenu are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the appl'zcation(s).
SIGNATURES OP EACH OWNER QF THE SiJB]'ECT PROPERTY ARE REQU�R,ED.
�r
Owne�s Sig. tiu�e �ate
Owne�s Signature Dabe
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'9 Signature Dabe
Ownet's Signature Date
ApplicantlAgent/Representative's Signature Date
�'� /��d �
Applicant/Agent/Re zesentative's Signature Date
�
!
CITY OF TIGARD
LAND USE APPLICATIONS
BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
This checklist identifies the basic submittal requirements for a land use application.
BASIC INFORMATION:
� Completed Master"Land Use Pem7it" Application with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of
authorization
�( Title u-ansfer iristrument or grant deed
�3( Written summary of proposal
}� Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified
in the Pre- Application Conference notes)
❑ Two (2) sets of stamped,addressed# 10 envelopes for all owners of propertywithin 500 feet of the subject
property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (# 10),addressed with 1" X 4" labels (see envelope
submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lisu must be prepared by the City for a minunal fee (see
request for 500'property owner mailing list form).
J8� Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting for the following: Site Development Review,Subdivision,
Conditional Use,Sensitive Lands Review,Zone Change,Comprehensive Plan Amendments
�$[ Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of Posting&Mailing Notice,Minutes,Sign-in Sheets
,'�� Service Provider Letter �
�( Impact Studyper Section 18.390.040.B.2(e)(%itl�u�,,-p /N NA��7 ✓C�
� Copyof the Pre-Application Conference notes
� Filing Fee (see fee schedule)
PLANS REQUIRED:
In addition to the above basic inforniation,each type of land use application will require one or more of the following
maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACEi OF THE PLANS C�-�CKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATTON(See
separate attachment for details on what information to include on each plan): APPLICATIONS WILI.NOT BE
ACG'EPTED IN PARTIAL SUBMITTALS. ALL ITElVLS MLTST BE SUBMITTED AT ONE TIME. EACH PACKET
MUST BE COLLATED.
,�( Vicinity Map �` Prelinunary Grading/Erosion Control Plan
j� Existing Conditions Map �' PreliminaryUtilities Plan
❑ Subdivision Preliinuiary Plat Map � Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan
❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan � Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan
,�( Site Development Plan ,�f Architectlu�al Drawings (elevations &floor
,�( Landscape Plan Pl��
❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan ❑ Sign Drawings
NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review
process. FOR PURPOSES OF REVIEWING YOUR APPLICATION FOR COMI'LETENESS,ONLY 3 COPIES
ARE NEEDED. T'�-� BALANC� OF THE COPIES WILL BE REQUESTED FROM YOU,ONCE DEEMED
,
COMI'LETE,TO MAKE YOUR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COMPLETE.
PLEASE NOTE: ROLLED PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED,FOLDED PLANS ONI.Y
I:\CURPT_N�Shirley\SubmiaalRequiremenu.doc
� �
Y
LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
. ,
120 DAYS = 2/16/2008
FILE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2007-00002
FILE TITLE: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CAFETERIA RENOVATION
APPLICANT: Broadway Rose"I'hcatre Co. APPLICANT'S Shiels, Obletz, &Johnsen
PO Box 231004 REP.: l�ttn: Francesca Gambetri
Tigard, OR 97281 1140 SW 11`'' rlvenue, Suire 500
Pordand, OR 97205
OWNER: Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
69G0 SW Sandburg Street
Tigard, OR 97223
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Condirional L-se approval to renovate a cafeteria/auditorium at C.F.
Tigard Elementary School to accommodate the Broadway� Rose Theatre. Proposed work includes a
2,600 square foot addition. The renovated builduZg�vill be used as theatre space and aclministrarive
offices for the Broadway Rose Theatre.
LOCATION: 12850 SW Grant .lvenue; Washington County Tax �-�ssessor's �1ap No. 2S102CB, Tax Lot 100 and
2S102BC,Tax Lot 8700.
ZONE: R-12: �ledium-Density Residenrial District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a
full range of housing types at a miniinum lot size of 3,050 square feet. r1 wide range of civic and
insritutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745,
18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II � TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
COMMENTS WERE SENT: NOVEMBER 6,2007 COMMENTS ARE DUE: NOVEMBER 20,2007
�HEr1RINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEr1RING: DECEMBER 10,2007 TIM�?: 7:00 PM
[PI.r,NNING COMl�7ISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEr1RING: TIME: 7:00 PM
[CIT'Y COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HE�RING: TIME: 7:30 PM
[STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DI�TE OF DF.CISION:
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
�VICINITY ����P � DI�,�IOLITION PL�1N � EZISTING CONDITIONS
�SITE PLr�N � 'IREF PL.��N � IMPACT STLDY
�Nr'1RR�1TI`'E � GR��DING PL,1N � S"1'(�RM H20 ANIILYSIS
STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171,extension 2437
,
LZty Of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigarc R 97223
�1
�
�k.����
��:; ,.�
September 5, 2007 � ¢ �
�� � -,���; =c-w�
Francesca Gambett►
Broadway Rose Theatre Co.
P.O. Box 231004
Tigard, OR 97281
Dear Ms. Gambetti:
RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—CUP2007-00002
The City has not received the informarion necessary to begin the review of your Conditional
Use Permit applicauon. The development site is located at 12850 SW Gtant Street. This letter
is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your application
complete. The necessary materials are as follows:
1. Naxrarive. Please revise the narrarive to address the criteria in the following code secrions
rather than pre-application notes. Responses must include facts to show how the
standards are met. If there are existing improvements, please give informarion on how
these existing improvements meet the standard. Please also include the Impact Study
found in your submitted narrative.
Tigard Development Code Sections:
�♦ 18.330.030, and 050.R.13
�• 18.510.050
• 18.705.030
�• 18.725.030
� 18.745.030, and 040,and O50
/i 18.755.040, and O50
� 18.765.030, 040,050, and 070
� 18.790.030
,� 18.795.040
� 18.810.030, 050, 070, 090, 100, 120
✓ 2. CWS Service Provider Letter. Please provide the completed form that includes CWS sign-
off.
3. Plans. Please provide the following information on the plans.
j♦ Building footprint size
� ♦ Lot square footage
�♦ Percentage of landscaping (show calculations)
✓� Percentage of building impervious surface on site
y� Dimensions of building footprint, building height, paxking space dimensions, aisle
width.
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
4. The items in the enclosed public facility completeness checklist must be addressed. Any
questions pertaining to public facilities can be directed to Kim McMillan at (503) 639-
4171 ext.2642.
5. These are not completeness items, but should be addressed to avoid issues during the
review process or conditions of approval.
,/i No street trees are shown for the project. Grant is a public street.
♦ Parking lot trees are typically provided at least 1 txee for every parking spaces. The
trees provided do not provide a canopy as required by the Tigard Development
Code.
♦ The narrative indicates that mitigation is required, but the tree plan states that no
mitigation is required. Which is correct?
♦ Lighting seems to be insufficient for the site. Can you provide a lighting plan or
show how the site will be illuminated?
If you have any questions about the above comments, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or
cherylc@tigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
C��UZ U C�
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
c: CUP2007-00002 Land Use File
PUBLIC FAC/LITY PLAN Projecf: �adwav Rose
COMPLETENESS CHECKUST Date: 8/31/07
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels?
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. Provide a plan sheet with fhe ROW
dedication for School Street indicated.
❑ Centerline of street s clearl shown.
❑ Street name s shown.
❑ Existin / ro osed curb or edge of_pavement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown.
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad�acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort Must address 18.705
❑ Street rades com liant?
❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate?
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width
a ro riate?
❑ Other:
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. Show on existing on the plans, Sheef C2.1.
Respond to 18.810.090- not just pre-app
notes.
❑ Stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines w/sizes noted?
� Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
� Pro osed meter location and size shown?
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide sformwater report and calculations.
provided? Respond to 18.810.100-not just pre-app
notes.
� Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
REVISED: 08/31/07
� �I" I��
�
The Broadway Rose Completeness Review
Com leteness Item Met Not Met N/A Comments
18.745.020: X
Applicability
18.745.030: X
General Provisions
18.745.040: X Street trees are not shown on the site
Street Trees plans. Is this project fronting public
streets?
18.745.050: X In most of the parking lot, there is not
Buffering and one tree per 7 parking spaces.
Screening
18.745.060: X Not addressed.
Re-ve etation
18.790.030: X Narrative indicates mitigation is
Tree Plan required and tree plan indicates
Requirement mitigation is not required. Needs
revision so components are in a reement
18.790.050: X
Permit Applicability
Todd Prager
City Arborist
September 5, 2007 �
SHIELS I OBLETZ�JOHN9EN • �
���1��
� . ���
September 27, 2007 � �
= � ? 2 7 2007
CITVpF r��;qRD
PLA(!�AliAlrr��!:-�,�;�,�.�����
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—CUP2007-00002
Dear Ms. Caines:
In response to your letter dated 9/5/07 regarding the Conditional Use Permit application
CUP2007-00002, enclosed are three (3) copies of the following materials:
1. Revised Narrative. The revised narrative addresses the Tigard Development Code Sections
requested in the letter received on 9/5/07, as follows: .
♦ 18.330.030 and OSO.B.13
♦ 18.510.050
♦ 18.705.030
♦ 18.725.030
♦ 18.745.030, and 040, and 050
♦ 18.755.040; and O50
♦ 18.765.030, 040, 050, and 070
♦ 18.790.030
♦ 18.795.040
♦ 18.810.030, 050, 070, 090, 100, 120
The revised narrative also addresses additional code sections requested in the Pre-
Application Conference Notes and in our telephone conversation two weeks ago, as
follows:
` ♦ 18.390.050
� ♦ 18.765.080
♦ 18.780
2. CWS Service Provider Letter.
♦ CWS Service Provider Letter with CWS sign-off is enclosed.
�HIELS OBLETZ JOHNSEN, INC DEVELOPMENT 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT '1'140 SW 'I'ITH AVENUE SUITE 500 POPTLAN�, OREGON 97205
..._...__ . __ __ ______________'. _._. .........__ . ... . . .. .. .. . .. ..._. .. ....__ _._... . .__ . . . . .. ...... .... ..._ . .. .
� T 503.242.00B4 F 503.299.6769 W SOJPDx.COM
�
3. Revised Plan Set. A replacement set of plans is enclosed which provides the informatiori
requested, as follows:
♦ The building footprint size, lot square footage,percentage of landscaping(showing
calculations) and percentage of site impervious surface can be found in the `Site Lot
Notes' added to the top right of page A1.02.
♦ Sheet A2.03 provides the building footprint dimensions.
♦ Building elevations with building height dimensions are included on sheet A3.01.
♦ Parking space dimensions and aisle widths can be found on sheet A1.02 in the new
paving hatched areas.
4. Documents addressing the public facility completeness checklist are enclosed, as follows:
♦ An l 1x17 sheet A1.00 Right-of-Way Dedication Plan for SW School Street is
- enclosed.
' ♦ Sections 18.705, 18.810.090 and 18.810.100 are addressed in the revised narrative.
♦ A stormwater report with calculations is enclosed.
♦ The existing sewer lines are not shown on the plans because they will be field
located. See note on the enclose plan sheet C2.L
5. Issues identified in section 5 of your letter dated 9/5/07 are addressed as follows:
♦ The existing street trees on SW Grant Street and SW School Street are shown on an
11 X 17 sheet A1.00 Right-of-Way Dedication Plan.
♦ More than one parking lot tree has been added to every 7 parking space per Section
18.745.050 of the Tigard Municipal Code. See section 18.745.050 in the revised
narrative and sheet A1.02 of the enclosed plan set.
♦ Mitigation is not required. The proposed project will preserve 6 out of 7 trees over
12" dbh on the site. According to the City of Tigard Code Section 18.790.030 B.d.,
if over 75% of the trees over 12" dbh are retained, mitigation planting is not required.
See Section 18.790.030 in the revised narrative and the Tree Plan in the enclosed
plan set.
♦ The lighting is to be designed and built per sheet A1.02, General Note #1 and the
Legend.
If you have any questions about the application please call me at 503-242-0084.
Sincerely,
.� .
i
rancesca Gambetti
Project Manager
City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigarc._ R 97223
�1
.
�
` ' 1
Octobex 12, 2007
Francesca Gambetti
Broadway Rose Theatre Co.
P.O. Box 231004
Tigard, OR 97281
Dear Ms. Gambetti:
RE: Notice of Incom�lete Application Submittal— CUP2007-00002
The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Conditional
Use Permit application. The development site is located at 12850 SW Grant Avenue. This
letter is to inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your
application complete. The necessary materials aYe as follows:
♦ Submit 9 copies of complete application packets. This includes plans and all
application mateYials that have been submitted to the City. If items have been revised,
please only include the revised version. Plan sets must be stapled and folded.
♦ Submit 9 additional copies of plan sets. These may be reduced copies provided they
are legible. One set must be 8.5" x 11".
♦ Submit 1 compact disc with all materials in a searchable format (PDF for
example).
♦ Subrnit two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. PYOperry owner list must
be produced by Patty Lunsford in the Planning Departtnent, 503-639-4171, ext. 2438. A
label request form is enclosed for your convenience.
If you have any questions about the above comments, please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or
c herylc @ tigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
���2.�%�=SCI. ��c-ti't��
v
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
c: CUP2007-00002 Land Use File
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
. �
I
�
.� �....�.
� - ��.�����D
.�:� �-� -
.
SHiELS � OBLETZ �..i(":-iNSEN I^ � 9 �OO/
1 140 SW Eleventh Avenue,Suite 500 0� �3���D
Portland,Oregon 97205
PH 503-242-0084 - FAX 503-299-6769 -''�I�
TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM
SEND VIA: ❑ FAX ❑ U.S. MAIL ❑ EXPRESS MAIL 0 HAND DELIVER
_PAGES
TO: Cheryl Caines, City of Tigard
FROM: Francesca Gambetti
DATE: October 18, 2007
SUBJECT: CUP2007-00002
ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
9 A lication ackets includin full-sized lan sheets
8 '/2 - sized lan sets
1 8 Y2 X 1 1 lan set
1 Com act disc with all materials in PDF format
❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION 0 FOR YOUR USE/FILES
❑ PLEASE RETURN_COPIES ❑ ORIGINAL IN MAIL
REMARKS:
2 sets of pre-addressed, pre-stamped envelopes to be messengered 10/19/07.
�
� � ; � �
(..i_� - �. 1'�- �lC. �_r., �i..
LAND USE APPLICI�ION Project: C � aoa�r -oo�� a a�a�.�
Date: q-�f r a7
COMPLETENESS REVIEW �COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
D d
STANDARD INFORMATION:
D � f Ownership [,� Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes,List of Attendees ❑ Impact Study(18.390)
SA Service Provider Lett ❑ Construction Cost Estimate [�' Envelopes with Postage(Verify Count)
[+�'� #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"Paper Copies" [� Pre-Application Conference Notes
#Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's"
PR JECT STATISTICS:
Buildin Footprint ize %of Landscaping On Site� [� %of Building Impervious Surface On Site
Lot Square Foo age -
P NS DIMENSIONED: -----
Building Footprin�;� Parking Space Dimensions(incivae Accessibie�s�ke Parkin
�_ Building eig � ccess pproac an is e �, Visual Clearance Triangle Shown
� --- __. - -
ADDITIONAL PLANS:
Q' Vicinity Map [� Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory
[✓]' Existing Conditions Plan [� Landscape Plan
❑ Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan
TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN:
[�' ,�e �h , , ti-: [�
� _ �� ..i : .. i � rn i�,c. � U rl (1�'� rC A�,i.�IG
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensi6ve Lands Review)
❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation} ❑ 18.780(Signs)
❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residen6al Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits)
❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.715(Densiry Computations) ❑ 18,790(Tree Removal)
❑ 18.370(VarianceslAdjustments) ❑ 18.72�(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas)
❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities)
❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/lmpact Study) ❑ 18.730(Excep6ons To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)
❑ 18.41 O(Lot Line Adjustrnents) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay)
❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits)
❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping 8 Screening Standards)
❑ 18.510{ResidenGal Zoning DisVicts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations)
❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecycling 5torage)
❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning DisVicts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
❑ 18,620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-SVeet ParkinglLoading Requirements)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
1:lcurpinlmasterslforms-revisedlland use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07 �
�
City of Tigard, Oregon - 1312s SWxall Blvd. • Tigara, .�R 97223
��
.
.
�
� ' �
October 25, 2007
Francesca Gambetti
Project Manager
Shiels, Obletz,Johnson, Inc.
1140 SW 11`''Ave., Suite 500
Pordand, OR 97205
RE: Completeness Review—Broadway Rose Cafetorium Renovation
Case File No. CUP2007-00002
Dear Ms. Gambetti:
I �'1�1 /1��
The City received your supplemental application materials on Ai}g�rst�607 for
Conditional Use Approval (CUP2007-00002) to renovate an e�cisting cafetorium building at
C. F. Tigard Elementary school into a theatre faciliry for the Broadway Rose. Staff has
completed review of the revised submittal materials and has determined that the application
is complete.
For the purposes of the State mandated 120-day review period, a final decision including any
local appeals must be made by February 16, 2008.A hearing with the Hearings Officer has
been scheduled for November 26, 2007. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the
applicarion submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and t11at addirional items
may arise during the applicarion review which may require further clarification.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please contact me at (503)
718-2437.
Sincerely, _
��� /�
(,�'1J� l�G�'�'ll'z�
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
cc: CUP2007-00002 Land Use File
Sharon Maroney, The Broadway Rose Theatre Co.
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
�
washinpton Counry,oreBon 2007-0'T7���
07112l2007 07:OJ:OS PM �
D�W CnIH �1n�11 C WMIT[
:10.00 fS.00 f��•a0•Total•12l.00
After recording,return to: Recorder's filing s� lI ` I` ` �
I I Illll
IIHI
II
! IIII�� �
�IIII �I
011�01862007007T1100020024
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J T::cie'rci.�oin b c��r c«+�ro:w..n�o e�
� Attn: Ray Burling Courdy,OnOen,de�w�0y aRMy tl�tl��wlthln
ImtrYm�nl e/w'Itlnp wu ncdv�d• n erd�d In H��
6960 SW Sandburg Street booholncord�o/�aldtau
Tigard,OR 97223 ��.,
� RIeh�N Fbp�mlchl,Oln or ef�uu�ma+l�nd
Tu�tlon,E�OHltle County CI�M
Until a change is requested,all tax statements shal]
be sent to: Not applicable.
SARGAIN AND SALE DEED
(LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED)
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J, an Oregon school district("Grantor"), conveys
to Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J, an Oregon school district("Grantee"),the real property
situated in Washington County, Oregon and more particularly described on Exhibit A(the
"Property").
This deed is being recorded to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the City of
Tigard under Case No. MIS2006-00004. The original recording deeds associated with this lot line
adjustment can be found in book ]00,page 435;book 100, page 436;book 226,page 77;book 296,
page 635; and book 44,page 391 of the real property records of Washington County, Oregon.
The true consideration for this conveyance is$0.00 and valid consideration other
than in the form of money.
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS 1NSTRUMENT,THE PERSON
TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY,
UNDER ORS 197.352.THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW U5E OF THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED 1N THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS
AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE
PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED
USES,TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMIIVG OR FOREST
PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS 197.352.
Dated as of the .3 day of ��/�_,2007.
�
GRANTOR AND GRANTEE:
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J
By:
�
�—�
Print: /Q�y ��U'��'
Title: G'ti�e F ���'�- D t�'1�/
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
COUNTY OF W uSJ�i ta� )
This instrument was aclmowledged before me on �1 �j 3 ,2007,by RU u� ' ,
of Tigard-Tualatin Schoo] District 23J,an Oregon school district.
" .Q 4�
o�cu�s�x
�y�u��y Not ublic for Oregon
� ;' �����a�oN My commission expires: �t /�� Z4a9
!�COMn�r'S EXPtR SE'PIE R 1
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIP'3'ION
ADJUSTED PARCEL 2
C.F.TIGARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
August 24,2003
A tract of land in Section 2,Township 2 South,Range i West,of the Willamette Meridian,City of
Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,described as follows
Bcginning at an iron rod with a 1 i/2"aluminum cap inscribed"pettijohn"marking the
southeasterly corner of Lot 43 as said Lot is shown and so designated on t6e Plat of"North
Tigardville Addition",a duly recorded plat filed in Book z,Page 2�,Washington County Plat
Records,said Point of Beginning as being the most westerly corner of the"Schvolhouse"tract as
shown and so designated on said Plat of"North Tigardville Addition";thence along the
southeasterly line of Lots q�and 43 and along the northwesterly line of said"Schoolhouse"tract
K•45°oo�3o"E.,3i2.q�feet to a il/x"iron pipe marking the most northerly corner of said
"Schoolhouse"tract;thence along the northeasterly line of said"Schoolhouse"tract
S•44°59'3o"E.,i85•38 feet to a 5/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed"W.L.Mc. IS 808"
marldng a point on the northwesterly right-of-way line of S.W.Pacific Highway;thence along
said northwesterly right-of-way line and along the arc of a spiral curve,offset 50.0o feet
northwesterty from the centerline of S.W. Pacific Highway an arc distance of 98.8q feet,said arc
being subtended by a chord which bears S.44°13'5o"W��98•76 feet;thence continuing along said
northwesterly right-of-way line and along the arc of a z9i4.'79 foot radius curve left(radius point
bears 5.46°32'44"E.)through a central angle of oq°i3'oq",an arc distance of 2iq.58 feet(chord
bears 5.41°2o'44"W.,2i4.33 feet)to a S/8"iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed"W.L.Mc.
LS 808"on the southwesterly line of said"Schoolhouse"tract;thence along said southwesterly
line N.4S°oi'4o"W.,200.43 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Contains 59,83o square feet or i.37 acres,more or less.
Thc basis of bearing for this description is Survey Number 2q,424,Washinglon County Survey
Records.
� __ ,___ ��
N ;ton County,Orepon 2007-077109
0)�._,t007 03:03:05 PM
o-0se cra•� sn,•» c wHire
510.00 SS.00 511.00•Totel�526.00
After recording,return to: Recorder's filing st
01140184200700771090020028
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J L Richud Hob�mltht,Dlnctor of Atuummt antl
, T�t�tlon and Ex-0rtklo County Ci�rN tor Wuhlnpton
Attn:Ray Burling CouMy,O��Qen,do h�nEy c�rtHy th�t th�wlthln ;
In�trum�rrt oI wrltlnp wn nnlr�d�nd n ord�d In th�'�:
6960 SW Sandburg Street eoor ar..�oro.or„ua�o�,� � �
Tigard,OR 97223 Rleh�rd Mob�mleht,ptr�ete�:...m.�� � ��
T�x�tlon,Ea�Ofllele County Cl�rk
Until a change is requested,all tax statements shall
be sent to: Not applicable.
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED
(LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED)
Tigazd-Tualatin School District 23J,an Oregon school district("Grantor"),conveys to
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J,an Oregon school district("Grantee"),the real property situated in
Washington County,Oregon and more particularly described on Exhibit A(the"Property").
This deed is being recorded to effect a lot line adjustment as approved by the City of Tigard
under Case No.MIS2006-00004. The original recording deeds associated with this lot line adjustment can
be found in book 100,page 435;book 100,page 436;book 226,page 77;book 296,page 635;and book 44,
page 391 of the real property records of Washington County,Oregon.
The true consideration for this conveyance is$0.00 and valid consideration other than in the
form of money.
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON
TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOLTLD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS,IF ANY,iJM�ER
ORS 197.352.THIS INSTRUMENT D�ES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED 1N
THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,TF-�PERSON ACQUIItING FEE TITLE
TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WTTH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES,TO DETERMINE ANY LIMTTS ON LAWSUTI'S
AGAIlVST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQLTIItE
ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS 197.352.
Dated as of the .3�day of �721 �t� ,2007.
GRANT�R AND GRANTEE:
TIG.ARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTR�CT 23J
By:
Print: �0 y �U/rL/�cl�---
� Title: 'LLi rr� /'�n�c°i.�r� O�u,�
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
COUNTY OF 1�+1 u5htY10 )
This instrument was acknowledged before rne on� 3 ,2007,by�0 U
of Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J,an Oregon school district.
. �
OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pu 'c for Oregon
.. CYNTHIA 1 HALL S`°9f" I �. 2D09
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My cominission expires:
COMMISSION NO.395453
MY COMMISS N EXPIRE SEPTEMBER 16 2009
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ADNSTED PARCEL i
C.F.TIGARU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
July i8,2oog
Revised January i9,2006
A tract of land in Section 2,Township 2 South,Range i West,of the Willamette Meridian,City of
Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 4i,ANorth Tigardville Addition@,a duly recorded
plat in Book 2,Page 2�,Washington County Plat Records,thence from said Point of Beginning
along the northeasterly line of said Lot 4i S.57°4o'oo"E.,4oz.49 feet to a�/8"iron rod with red
plasric cap inscribed AW.L.Mc.IS 808"marking the most easterly corner of said Lot 4i;thence
along the easterly line of Lot 4i and Lot 42,S.45°oo'3o"W�333•92 feet to a 1/i2 iron pipe to a
point marking the most northerly corner of the ASchool House@ iract as shown on said plat of
ANorth Tigardville Addition@;the along the westerly line of said ASchool House@ tract and the
easterly line of said L.ot 42 and Lot 43,continuing 5.45°0o'3o"W.,302.93 feet to a 5/8'iron rod
with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L.MC.LS 808"marking the northeasterly corner of that
certain street dedication as described in Book 226,Page 473,Washington County Deed Records;
thence along the northeasterly line of said street dedication N.5o°ob'o6"W.,322.04 feet to a
5'/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L.Mc.PIS 808"marlting a point on the
southeasterly right-of-way line of S.W.Grant Avenue;thence along said southeasterly right of
way line N.39°53'S4"E.,iib.66 feet to a 5/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L.Mc.
IS 808";thence N.54°i8'2�"W.,4i2.35 feet to a 5/8 iron rod with red plasric cap inscribed
AW.M_ Mc. LS So8";thence N.39°53'oo"E.,449•41 feet to a 2"iron pipe:thence 5.57°4o�56"E.,
394•55 feet to 5/8"iron rod with red pIasric cap inscribed AW.L.Mc.LS 808,said point being a
point on the centerline of S.W.Grant Avenue;thence along said centerline 5.39°53�5o°W.b.56
feet to the Point of Beginning.
Excepting there from all that portion of Right-of-way dedicated to the City of Tigard in
Document I�Tumbers 2oo3i58�64 and 2oo3i58�65.
Contains 383,ioi square feet or 8.79 acres,more or less.
The basis of bearing for this description is Survey Number 29,424�Washington County Survey
Records.
,
FAST 1/4 NIU NIYS.TGO .II
xn�vuirtn.�.ic.�x ' rouc s�e•�a�oo rdw�/r+o.
���� rr[ro�aip BH 04/30/Y0p3
wa ncwo��t mnn�' swvaav »u lem��m na m) ino 29,4'14 r�a
K�D ti'��� OLl OS/O1/200J
mr m ca�rar.
evR minizoa:
WIRMTNE w�1e a.u+n
DLl 07/17/200J
M PUROSE Or TC Mrt�I]N YOK M[�IIOOIm MM'UR'/l�E CM1�cY�E
MNSIIOIf KI1 bM M IqMD wOMCt p e(mY�f00Y00o��.MRE
ORTNfY pg�1MIN M 1N[WK0.�M�IIOM q M�CRM01l�U(
O�MpoMF]CIIMK FI�iO�/5 1K 1v11O�YOiI�1 M[1q5I F �
� . 'bY]l]Nd1�iR�u4 fIR li(1%Il0 iMY w0 � Z
K[�t M'�M0.[Yup Y�1�1[,�GTlblr IM.�/�101 lW[IOI�IJII � b7 #
Y �p
� � � �
� �
� - 0' 30' 60' 120' q�
wrn � �an �g � <,
� "'_"°° °
� o-ar.rr• ? �d��i
`o�-'wi:..�arc�i."t �a<
Z
� ���° aW0
13'SNRM� y J F
SGW E1IDQ1 V W mo�u.�
J
R�]f./c n.l (V �i' � u a p 0�
M $.W. CiRMlT AVE. — ———4'�p.__ _ '°`.!eYSra.l.n — O m a'
_�_ -- ��°`" .�# S.W_GWWT AVE. p�,o a�z
a — �——_——— ��.u�•.., :a� a w��o i
' w� �
iwa sA.1a s �>u:,sse- Q P '� waim ac aw mm i sxsra� asc q���^o N
�eo nnn�w � i-�u ra o¢n ew�tw A ao
1��Yllk.lS.O' or-;rn�Y �rj� 1-
,m mMe s/e'�ou�oo a ; c.�
� 'iwa.�, wx Rn vusnc ar 4,S'} O o���
II .earm rycu,oe• A.w or.a omu,ox a S`� LECFNO p+ :Z r-
w.�i�uv'ae'r. NtU 4F OO11111[NI N0.1�i9M� ��N.$�� h�l �[w�o wr�iu s.ri�e.m a'�li�O�
I " al a.» wner.urn W O o U
0
I �•.M��v.~n �mnu p�iu.�io�onxns �I� i� � • n.orts�mMO ww�c«r.c,o�m O oi a a o�
� � rt A wYM�mMn�[wm� �N Z���
� � Fj 's '�+a0 Q\Z
o . ioi q � im�: 1 �y N =Z
3 I� � x I� ' nVfpp91 J/S1TtD'Olr eL� C�O W Q Q
N
�a H O
I I �n�
VjI� � �OJ���
r u[to w�i vL K i� W It Q Z O Z()�
I O F
�.. �
A�I �IIII I[O�ASnK W � O O 4 W O�
a
�aa�o�i.ciuo�• W a a���
K�uwrsn wwsa�iowix i�n. xm ���„ raro i��:'� I 0:¢Z �°
Rnwr oow�.i �y.�.a� � ��-�
� wv7st � �
�an�
�—�a uvon ra �''0°�� �+: � �
7 I �.mRf w�o wNr , rouo 5/U'WI Rto
R A!.1C ri� wN 40 A,61E GY �woFUe�Oru�
� I Z � �601�tiLIkLSlOA' •`�YRV[�Ow '
ia n y
,'s P A R C E� - • � i��,,.���,��a
' r°�°sa,n. � o.w�y oir im n e�r..n w.
� x �.t.o..��e.oa�.i„rrns
��•���� n� M+1 �cwt
nx co vmc w���LO ro'wu � ie��.�a�*�h✓M rw
``"""°'' ���� '°"°"'��'"�" RECEIVED PLANNING
� � N!IM F�Si .1/�'RW(a I�MEO �qp S/!'IIM IIOp NM 11781
�L��� �h•�t�� Proj�cl xe.
����'�� f.56 R�bI1.M 1.211,y /IStpb[p ylyu�,s.ep•
""""'�"'""""'�' °�"°'� �«� FEB 2 3 2006
�.��� b,3q aub.HrWwY� t��.0 5787R160.OWC
m — _SW PAqFlC HICHWAY ��.7c WASHWGTON COUNTY SUINEYOR'S UfFICE ���1� OF �
— — °�°°"'"°�'°'' CITY OF TIGARD �rzo roR��
� ��-„-o. �.K��o.
i
�`o oso` �
� ���
WRITTEN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
This proposal is to renovate the old cafeteria/auditorium at CF Ti�ard Elementarv School to
accommodate the Broadwav Rose Theatre companv.The existin� 10 600 square foot buildin�will be
renovated and a new lobbv and scene shoq will expand it to 13 200 square feet Preliminarv plans for
the proiect include a theatre space(with 236 permanent seats) office space for 6 administrative staff
and 93 parkin�spaces(62 net new spaces• 31 are existin�).
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page 1
12850 SW Grant Street
1
a r�rQ � v
�
� ��V�����
SEP 2 7 200�' Broadway Rose Theatre Company
F TIGARG� 12850 SW Grant Avenue ���`�F►lO�
CITY 0 _ �
_r.r�^'r';,n.r:!C'A�t�:►�1'rr���,'t`, ,
Tigprd, OR 97223 ;��-�, ' "/ :/
CUP2007-00002
� �>'Ii Y ;;i} � :
� ���I'VG���GINEERfNq
NARRATIVE DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH ALl' ��
APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND APPROVAL CRITERIA
REVISED: 9/27/07
18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval
RESPONSE: The Applicant understands that the Hearin�s Officer will aqprove, approve with
conditions, or denv this apqlication for a conditional use based on findin�s of fact with respect to
the criteria listed in section 18.330.030.A of the Ti�ard Municipal Code (TMC1. The proposed qroiect
meets the criteria as follows:
1. The size and dimensions of the Proiect Site (sqecificallv described as 2S102C600100 and
2S102CB08700, the "Proiect Site") provide adeauate area for the needs of the proposed theatre
(see enclosed site plan and Section 18.330.050.6.13. below);
2. The impacts of the proqosed use of the Proiect Site can be accommodated considerin�size,
shape, location, topo�raphv, and natural features (see enclosed site plan and Section
18.360.090 and 18.390.050 below);
3. All required public facilities have adeauate capacitv to serve the proposal: (See Impact
Assessment in Section 18.390.050 belowl.
4. The applicable requirements of the zonin�district are met, as presented herein.
5. The apqlicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met—(See Section 18.330.050 belowl
6. The apqlicable supplementarv repuirements set forth in other chapters of this code are met, as
presented herein.
The Applicant understands that the Hearin�s Officer mav impose conditions on the approval of this
conditional use that are found necessarv to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the
vicinitv, and that the impact of the proposed theatre use on the surroundin� uses and public
facilities is minimized.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 1
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.330.050.6.13.Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types
B. Additional development standards. The additional dimensional requirements and approval
standards for conditional use are as follows:
13. Major Event Entertainment:
a. The minimum lot size shall be two acres;
b. Setbacks:
(1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 30 feet;
(2) On corner lots and through lots,the setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet on any side
facing a street, plus meets visual clearance areas, Chapter 18.795;
(3) The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet;
(4) The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 30 feet; and
(5) Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45
feet.
c. With regard to off-street parking: Exempt, if constructed with a school use. Otherwise,
requirements shall comply with Section 18.765;
RESPONSE: The Proiect Site is 8.9 acres,which meets the minimum lot size requirement of two acres.
The setbacks of the proposed proiect are 70 feet (to the north), 125 feet (to the eastl, 170 feet (to the
westl and 425 feet (to the south).The minimum setback repuirements are met.The proqertv is not on a
corner lot or a throu�h lot so the setback requirements defined in section 18.330.050.6.13.b.2 of the
TMC are not applicable.The buildin� hei�ht is 24 feet so no setback increases are reauired. Off-street
parkin� is provided in accordance with the applicable requirements in Section 18.765 of the TMC(see
Sections 18.765.030, 18.765.040, 18.765.050 and 18.765.070 below)
18.360.090 Approval Criteria
RESPONSE: The Applicant acknowled�es that the Director shall make a findin�on this conditional use
repuest with respect to each of the criteria in Section 18.360.090 of the TMC.The proposed proiect
meets the applicable criteria in Section 18.360.090 as follows:
• The proqosed qroiect complies with all of the applicable repuirements of the TMC includina Section
18.810, Street and Utilitv Standards as presented herein (see Sections 18.810.030, 18.810.050,
18.810.070, 18.810.090, 18.810.100, and 18.810.120 below);
• The existin� buildin�will be lar�elv preserved and the buildin�expansion and site improvements
have been desi�ned to preserve existin�trees,topo�raphv and natural draina�e where possible
based upon existin�site conditions.The buildin� is located in an area that is not subiect to�round
slumpin�or slidin�. The closest nei�hborin� buildin� is over 70 feet to the north, therefore the
proposed proiect is in a location that provides adequate distance between adiacent buildin�s for
adequate li�ht, air circulation, and fire-fightin�.The existin� buildin�and proposed expansion have
also been oriented with consideration for sun and wind.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 2
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 5W Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
• Everv effort is bein� made to preserve and protect existin�trees on the propertv. Replacement of
trees wi�l meet the applicable requirements of Section 18.790 Tree Removal (see Section
18.790.030 and 18.7980.060.E, below)
. The proposed qroiect incorporates innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site
hydrolo�v and fish and wildlife habitat caused bv stormwater runoff,as required in Section
18 810 100(see Section 18.810.100 below sheet C2.1 Utilitv Improvements Plans and Draina�e
Report) Water qualitv facilities roof runoff controls and preservation of existin�ve�etative and
canopv cover are some of the techniques used bv the proposed proiect to minimize stormwater
impacts The Proiect Site is not located in a si�nificant habitat area as identified on Citv of Ti�ard
"Si�nificant Habitat Areas Map."
• Bufferin�will be provided between proposed proiect and the adiacent residential use as required in
Section 18.745.050 of the TMC(see Section 18.745.050 belowl.The proposed proiect provides on-
site screenin�from view from adioinin�properties of such thin�s as service areas, stora�e areas,
parkin� lots and mechanical devices on roof tops.The trash stora�e area is screened bv the
masonrv wall enclosure and�ate The parkin�areas will not be visible from any adioinin� properties.
A fence and landscape buffer will screen the parkin�from view from the residential propertv to the
north and a fence will screen it from the adioinin�commercial propertv to the east.The expansive
site area and the drop in �rade to the south will screen the parkin�from the nei�hborin� propertv to
the south The rooftop mechanical svstems will be located on the northeast corner of the buildin�
and will not be visible from adioinin� properties in any direction.The fence and landscaqe buffer will
screen it from the adioinin� propertv to the north and the existin�fence will screen it from the
adioinin� propertv to the east.The existin� buildin�and expansive site area will also screen it from
nei�hborin� properties to the south and west.
. The proposed propertv is not located in the 100-vear floodplain,therefore Section 18.360.090.A.8 of
the TMC is not applicable.
• Demarcation of public semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention The proposed prolect is
desi�ned lar�ely for public or semi-public use.The trash service area will be�ated to prevent entrv
from unauthorized persons. Si�na�e will indicate that the buildin�serves the Broadwav Rose
Theatre CompanV.
• Crime prevention and safetv.Windows on the proposed proiect are located so that much of the
propertv can be surveved bv the buildin�occupants. New windows will be added to the north side
of the existin� buildin�where offices will be located which will enhance propertv surveillance.The
interior lobbv is enclosed in�lass which will enable people to monitor the property from inside and
outside the buildin�.
. The exterior li�htin�will be provided on a desi�n-build basis. Li�htin�levels will be selected and the
anRles will be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime. Fixtures will be placed at a hei�ht that
enables li�ht patterns to overlap at a hei�ht of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person.
The preliminarv plan provided with the application distributes lightin�poles throu�hout the surface
parkin�area to ensure adequate li�htin�in the parkin�areas and walkwavs. Existin� li�htin�around
the remainder of the propertv provides adequate li�htin�to ensure the safetv of all users.
. Public transit: The Proiect Site is located within 500 feet of ORE 99W,which is desi�nated as a
Primarv Bus Route (west of ORE 217) in Metro's Re�ional Transportation Plan (RTP). However,the
Project Site does not have fronta�e on ORE 99W and providin�transit facilities(includin�bus stop
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 3
Broadway Rose 7heatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
shelters, bus turnouts, etc.) is not feasible�iven the size and tvpe of the proqosed proiect and the
existin�traffic and transit patterns.
• Landscapin�: All landscapin�for the proposed proiect is desi�ned in accordance with the applicable
requirements set forth in Section 18.745 of the TMC(see Sections 18.745.030, 18.745.040, and
18.745.050 below).The proposed proiect exceeds the minimum repuirement for 20 percent of the
�ross area includin� parkin�, loadin�and service areas to be landscaped.The proposed and existin�
buildin�s and impervious surfaces cover 52%of the Proiect Site(4.6 of the 8.9 acres). Landscaped or
natural ve�etation covers the remainin�489'0 of the propertv.
• Draina�e: Drainage for the proposed proiect is desi�ned in accordance with the criteria in the
adopted 1981 master draina�e plan (see enclosed plans and section 18.810.100 below);
• Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled in the proposed proiect have been desi�ned
in accordance with the reauirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447(see enclosed plan sheets C1.1,
C1.2,C2.1 and C3.1, and Sections 18.765.030 and 18.765.040 belowl.
18.390.050 Decision-Making Procedures—Type III Procedures
RESPONSE: The aqplicable criteria in Section 18.390.050.A and B of the TMC have been met bv the
Applicant.A preapplication conference was held On June 26, 2007.The enclosed application includes a
completed application form and includes the information requested on the application form. It
addresses the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action and is accompanied by the
reauired fee.The two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes for all persons who are property
owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.050C will be provided when requested bv the City
Plannin� Department.An impact studv is provided below.
Transaortation Svstem Impacts:
The access to the proposed proiect is via SW Grant Avenue,which is a Local Residential Street from the
proqertv to Walnut Street(a Maior Collector) and then becomes a Minor Collector. Walnut Street
connects with 99W(an Arterial).
The qroposed proiect will not si�nificantiv impact traffic durin�peak hours. Most of the traffic
�enerated bv the proposed proiect will be at the start and end of performances. Performances are
planned to be held at 8:OOpm for evenin�shows(Thursdav. Fridav and Saturdav ni�hts) and 2:OOpm for
Sundav matinees. Performances will take place in Januarv, March, Mav. September and November.The
Broadwav Rose Theatre Companv and the Ti�ard-Tualatin 5chool District will collaborate to ensure that
there will be no conflict between performances and the occasional evenin�/weekend events that will be
held at CF Ti�ard Elementarv School.
Furthermore, the proposed proiect is reutilizin�an existin� buildin�which was used by the Ti�ard
Tualatin School District in the evenin�s for various events, includinQ:
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 4
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
• School board meetin�s 2-3 times each month
. Music performances 8-10 times each years attractin�400-500 people per event
Therefore the net new impact of the proposed proiect is si�nificantiv less than if it were a new
development.
The Ti�ard Transportation Svstem Plan (TSP) indicates that there are a number of schools in Ti�ard
where the surroundin� roadwavs create barriers for access due to limited width and pedestrian
facilities Issues were identified at five (S)schools, none of which were at CF Tigard Elementarv School.
The Ti�ard TSP also reports that the intersections of ORE 99W/Walnut Street is operatin�at level of
service D durin�the weekdav evenin� peak hour which is considered to be acceptable operatin�
performance for a si�nalized intersection.Since this proposed proiect will not be addin�si�nificant
traffic durinQ the weekdav evenin�peak hour, the current level of service is not expected to be
impacted to unacceptable levels.
There is�ood bus service to the proposed proiect with stops on 99W/Walnut Street(#12 and#94) and
SW Grant Avenue/Walnut Street(#451.There will also be 50 bike parkin�spaces located within 50 feet
of the main entrance. Patrons of the theatre will have viable options for utilizin�alternative modes of
transportation.
Traffic impact miti�ations will be qrovided bv the qroposed proiect as required bv the City.A Traffic
Impact Fee will be paid and a seven foot ri�ht-of-wav dedication will be made along the qortion of the
Prolect Site that abuts SW School Street as required by the Citv En�ineer. It is further understood that
street improvements are a standard requirement of the Citv, and that the required exaction (of both
ROW dedication and public improvements)shall be directly related to and rou�hly proportional to the
impact of the proposed development.The proposed prolect will include street improvements to the
portion of SW School Street that abuts the Proiect Site, as determined bv the Citv En�ineer to be a
condition of approval.
Stormwater Svstem Impacts
RESPONSE• A private water qualitv and detention pond is proposed for the east side of the propertv to
collect stormwater run-off from the new impervious surfaces of the proposed proiect.Stormwater from
the new parkin�will be collected in area drains and directed to the detention pond.The stormwater will
then be dischar�ed into the existin�storm manhole located in the SW Grant Avenue turn-around.
Stormwater from the new scene shop will be collected in a roof drain and will also be dischar�ed into
the existin�storm manhole.Two of the existin�catch basins in the existin�parkin�area will be retained
and protected.This stormwater svstem has been desi�ned to satisfy the CWS and Citv of Ti�ard
requirements for water qualitv and detention facilities. (See enclosed sheet C2.1 Utilitv Improvements
Plans and Draina�e Reportl
Parks Svstem Impacts
RESPONSE•The proposed development is for Maior Event Entertainment, and patrons to this venue will
not add demand to the City's parks svstem. Furthermore the reuse of the existing buildin�will preserve
the field and plav areas on the propertv which serve as a park for nei�hborin�residents.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 5
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
Water Svstem Impacts:
RESPONSE: The proposed proiect will utilize the existin�water line that connects to the public line
located in SW Grant Avenue. A new 1-inch meter will be installed. Since the proposed proiect is utilizinQ
an existin� line,the impact to the public water svstem will be minimal.
Sanitarv Svstem Impacts:
RESPONSE:The proposed proiect will use the existin�sewer connection between the existin�8-inch
public sewer in SW Grant Avenue and the existing buildin�. The plan is to conduct a test usin�existin�
facilities inside of the buildin�to make sure the existin�connection does not require anv improvements.
The capacitv of the sewer line is adequate to service the proposed qroiect so the impacts to the existin�
public svstem will be minimal.
Noise Impacts
RESPONSE: The�roposed development for a theatre space repuires�reat care to ensure acoustic
pualitv and minimize the external noise imqacts on the space.An acoustical consultant has been
retained to ensure that there are minimal sound impacts on the theatre space, and as a result,the
external sound impacts will be minimal as well. Furthermore,there are no plans for si�nificant outside
activit� so noise impacts on the nei�hborhood will a�ain be minimal.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING.
The Applicant shall notify all property owners within 500 feet, inrerested parties, and the City of Tigard
Planning Division of their proposal.A minimum of rwo(2) weeks between the mailing date and the
meeting date is required.
RESPONSE: Nei�hborhood meetin� notifications were mailed out to the Citv of Ti�ard Plannin� Division
and all propertv owners within 500 feet of the propertv on June 15, 2007 (ei�hteen (18) davs prior to
the meetin�datel.Two si�ns were also qosted on the propertv on June 15, 2007. The nei�hborhood
meetinQ was held on Julv 2, 2007. Si�n-in sheets and notes from this meetin�are attached to this
application.
18.510.050 Residential Zoning Districts-Development Standards
RESPONSE:The Applicant is requestin�a Conditional Use for the proqosed proiect, which is located in a
residential zonin�district.As addressed above in Section 18.330.050.6.13.,the proqosed qroiect meets
the development standards for Maior Event Entertainment.The qroposed proiect meets the maximum
hei�ht limit of 35 feet,the minimum landscape requirements of 20%and the maximum site covera�e of
80% stipulated in Table 18.510.2. The proqosed buildin� has a hei�ht of 24 feet.The qroposed and
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 6
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 5W Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
existin� buildin�s and impervious surfaces cover 52%of the Proiect Site (4.6 of the 8.9 acres).
Landscaped or natural ve�etation covers the remainin�48%of the qropertv.
All other aqplicable standards and requirements in this title are satisfied, as indicated herein.
18.705.030 Access, Egress&Circulation -General Provisions
RESPONSE: The proposed proiect meets the applicable requirements in Section 18.705.030, as follows:
The Applicant and/or Owner will maintain the access and e�ress of the proposed proiect on a
continuous basis.
Access plan requirements. Scaled plans are enclosed that show how access, e�ress and circulation
requirements are fulfilled bv the proposed proiect (see enclosed Site PIan1.
Joint access. The p_r_oposed proiect provides ioint e�ress with the existing parkin� lot that serves C.F.
TiQard Elementarv School. Since both uses are under the same ownershia no le�al evidence is required
to establish the ioint use.
The existin� vehicular access and e�ress to the parkin� area of the proposed proiect connects directiv
with a public street (SW Grant Avenue) and will be maintained at the required standards on a
continuous basis.
No new curb cuts are proposed onto anv street. Existin� curb cuts are in accordance with Section
18.810.030 (see Section 18.810.030 below).
Required walkwav location. On-site pedestrian walkwavs comply with the standards in Section
18.705.030.F., as follows:
Concrete walkwavs will extend from the lobbv entrance and all other�round floor entrances of
the proposed proiect to the sidewalk that leads to the Grant Avenue round-about. Existin�
sidewalks will connect the proiect to the CF Ti�ard Elementarv School and the residential areas
down Grant Avenue. Painted crosswalks will provide safe pedestrian crossin�s from the
walkwavs across the vehicle access drives of the parkins area.All of the walkwavs are a
minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhan�s and obstructions, and are in
compliance with ADA standards.
The desi�n of the service drive does not reauire or facilitate the backward movement or other
maneuverin�of a vehicle within a street.The drive is desi�ned to enable the forward movement
of vehicles throu�h the parkin� lot to the e�ress.
Access Mana�ement.The proposed proiect is not proposin�anv new drivewavs onto a street. Given that
the proposed proiect will have minimal traffic impacts(see Section 18.390.050 above), that the
drivewavs on SW Grant Avenue alreadv exist,and that these existin�drivewavs connect to a cul-de-sac.
an access report has not been qrovided.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 7
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
No drivewavs are proposed to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Therefore, section 18.705.030.H.2 is not applicable.
No new drivewavs or streets are proposed to be placed alon�a collector street, and there are no local
streets proposed to be placed alon� a local street.Therefore. Sections 18.705.030.H.3 and
18.705.030.H.4 are not aqplicable.
Per Table 18.705.3, since this proiect has a minimum requirement of 79 parkin�spaces(1 sqace per 3
seats with 236 permanent theatre seats proposed for this proiectl,a minimum of 1 drivewav is required
with a minimum access width of 30' and a minimum of a 24'width of qavement between curbs.The
proposed proiect includes two (2) existin�drivewavs with 26' access widths and a minimum of 24' of
pavement between curbs. Vehicular access i5 located to within 50 feet of the primary�round floor
entrance.
One-wav vehicular access points. With a 24' drive aisle,the proposed parkin�facilitv could
accommodate two-wav traffic, but to miti�ate traffic impacts with the existin� parkin� lot a one-wav
traffic flow is proposed.The SW Grant Avenue cul-de-sac includes three access drives to serve three
parkin�areas.The first existin�access drive closest to oncomin�traffic serves as an entrv and exit to an
existin�parkin�area.The second access drive serves as the entrv and exit to an existin� parkin�area
and is proposed to serve as the exit to the proposed parkin�area. The proposed parkin� is situated with
the exit drive closest to oncomin�traffic and the entrance drive farthest from oncomin�traffic in order
to work with the traffic patterns of the existin� parkin�area. Since traffic is limited to vehicles circlinQ
the existin� parkin� lot or the cul-de-sac at SW Grant Ave, safetv and traffic flow will not be
compromised bv the proposed plan.
18.725.030 Environmental Performance Standards
A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation,the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of
the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
RESPONSE: The proposed proiect will complv with the noise resulations set forth in Sections 7.40.130
throu�h 7.40.210 of the Ti�ard Municipal Code. Durin�construction, noise-�eneratin�activities will onlv
take qlace between 7am and 7pm,7 davs/week, as permitted under section 7.40.180.E and F.
B. Visible emissions.Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park(IP) zoning district,
there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point-source emission,
other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water(steam)
which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible
emissions(340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply.
RESPONSE: Section 18.725.030.6 is not applicable since the proiect site is in a residential zone (R12).
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 8
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
.
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted
in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use
concerned.
RESPONSE: No vibration discernable without instruments at the qropertv line will be�enerated bv the
proposed prolect.
D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable
at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for
odors (340-028-090) apply.
RESPONSE: No emission of odorous�ases or other matter in such quantities as to be readilv detectable
at anv point bevond the propertv line will be�enerated bv the proposed proiect.
E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare,whether from floodlights or from high temperature
processes such as combustion or welding,which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and;
1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot
line of the source; and
2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction
equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title.
RESPONSE: No direct or skv-reflected�lare, whether from flo�dli�hts or from hi�h temperature
processes such as combustion or weldin�, which is visible at the lot line,will be�enerated bv the
proposed proiect, except perhaps durin�construction (as permitted in section 18.725.030.E.2.1.
F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be
maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create
a health hazard.
RESPONSE: Waste will be stored in trash containers and will be re�ularlv collected bv a disposal service
so as not to attract or aid the propa�ation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The refuse
collection area located on the north side of the buildin�will be enclosed bv a masonry wall and �ate to
minimize access bv rodents. The proiect�rounds will be maintained to hi�h standards to ensure the
health and safetv of students, nei�hbors, staff and patrons.
18.745.030 Landscaping&Screening-General Provisions
RESPONSE: As required in Section 18.745.030, all landscapin� and screenin� will be maintained in �ood
condition so as to present a healthv, neat and orderlv appearance. It will be replaced or repaired as
necessary, and will be kept free from refuse and debris. All plant �rowth in landscaped areas of the
proiect will be controlled bv prunin�, trimmin� or otherwise so that (1) it will not interfere with the
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 9
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
maintenance or repair of anv public utilitv: (2) it will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access; and (3) it
will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibilitv.
All landscapin� will be installed accordint� to accepted plantin� procedures. Plant materials will be of
hi�h �rade, and will meet the size and �radin� standards of the American Standards for Nurber� Stock
(AN51 Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisionsl. Landscapin� will be installed in accordance with the
provisions of this title (see enclosed landscaqe plan).
The Aqplicant acknowled�es that a Certificate of Occupancv will not be issued unless the landscapin�
reauirements have been met or other arran�ements have been made and aqproved bv the Citv such as
the postin�of a bond.
Existin�ve�etation on the proiect site will be protected as much as possible.The tree plan provided bv a
certified arborist (attached to this application) provides methods for the protection of existin� trees to
remain durin� the construction process. The Site Plan (see enclosed site plan) notes which trees will be
saved.
Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscapin� materials will be
provided bv the owner of the propertv abuttin� the ri�hts-of-wav unless otherwise required for
emer�encv conditions and the safetv of the�eneral public.
It is understood that review procedures and standards for reauired landscapin� and screenin� will be
s�ecified in the conditions of approval durin� development review and in no instance will be less than
that reauired for conventional develoqment.
Hei�ht restrictions abuttin� public ri�hts-of-wav are not applicable since the proiect does not abut a
roadwav without an established curb and�utter.
18.745.040 Landscaping&Screening-Street Trees
C. Size and spacin�of street trees.
1. Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two
inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Section 18.745.040.C.2
below;
d. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be
planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from
private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility
poles to maintain visual clearance;
RESPONSE: Existin�street trees on SW Grant and School Street meet the requirement for developments
frontin� on a public or private street (see existin� street trees identified on the enclosed ROW
Dedication Plan). The trees are sqaced at apqroximatelv 10 - 12 feet apart or 12 feet from a curb, which
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 10
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
meets code requirements specified in Section 18.745.040.C. These existin�trees are more than two feet
from the face of the curb and from anv permanent hard surface pavin�or walkwav.
All existin� street trees will be protected and preserved and no new street trees are proposed. No
cuttin�or filling will take place within the drip-line of the existin�trees. The existin�trees, as thev�row,
will be pruned to provide at least ei�ht feet of clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above Grant Street
and SW School Street(local streets).
On-premises utilities (includin�water and �as meters and under�round power lines)will not be installed
within existin�tree well areas.
No new li�ht standards are proposed that are positioned closer than 20 feet to existin� street trees, and
no overhead utilitv line5 are proposed for the proiect. There is no si�nalized intersection near the
propertV.
The aqplicable requirements in Section 18.745.040 are met.
18.745.050 Landscaping&Screening-Buffering and Screening
RESPONSE: Per Section 18.745 of the TMC, the proposed prolect will include a buffer on the north side
of the proiect between the new parkin� and the adiacent residential propertv (see enclosed site plan).
Per Table 18.745.1, the proposed proiect must meet the buffer standard "D". A 15-foot buffer will be
provided with a row of 6 small or narrow-stature trees, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at
maturitv, spaced 15 feet apart. These trees will have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in
hei�ht above �rade for deciduous trees and a minimum hei�ht of five feet hi�h for ever�reen trees at
the time of plantin�. The buffer area will include 10 five-�allon shrubs or 20 one-�allon shrub for everv
1,000 SF, and the remainin�area will be planted in lawn. This buffer area will not include anvthin�other
than landscape materials—there will be no buildin�s, accesswavs or parkin� in the buffer area.
The existin� chain link fence will be preserved and vertical slats will be added to meet the screenin�
repuirements. The existin� parkin� area is non-conformin� and will remain so: the existin� fence and
hed�e will be preserved.
An enclosed refuse collection area is proposed for the north side of the buildin�. It will be screened bv
the new scene shop to the west and a masonry wall and �ate. All refuse will be contained within the
screened area. (see section 18.755.050 below)
The proposed proiect includes one tree for everv 5.6 new qarkin� spaces (11 trees for 62 new parkin�
spaces) equallv distributed throu�hout the new parkin� area (see enclosed Site Plan). These new trees
meet the requirement for a minimum of one tree for every seven new parkin� spaces, as stipulated in
Section 18.745.050.E). These trees will be planted around the new parkin� area in landscaped islands
and in the new bioswale to provide a canopv effect. The proposed landscape islands are at least three
feet and the landscapin�will be protected from vehicular damage by a curb.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � il
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
The new qarkin�area will not be visible from anv adioinin� properties. A fence and landscape buffer will
screen the parkin� from view from the residential propertv to the north and a fence and landscaped
bioswale will screen it from the adioinin� commercial propertv to the east. The expansive site area and
the droq in �rade to the south will screen the qarkin� from the nei�hborin� properties to the south. It
will be lar�elv screened from the public ri�ht-of-wav on SW Grant Street bv the existin� buildin� and
new scene shop. (See enclosed Site Plan)
The electrical transformer near the northwest corner of the buildin� and the electrical box attached to
southwest corner of the buildin� are screened with landscapin�(see enclosed Site PIan1. Gas meters will
also be screened with landscaqin�. Rooftoq units are small and far enou�h from the paraqet ed�e that
they will not be visible won't be visible from a public street, customer or resident parkin� area, anv
public facilitv or anv residential area.
18.755.040 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage - Methods of Demonstrating Compliance
RESPONSE: The Applicant is usin�the "franchise hauler review method"to demonstrate compliance
with Sections 18.755.040 and 18.755.050 of the TMC.Althou�h the proposed proiect meets the
minimum stora�e repuirement in Section 18.755.040.S.b(5) (see note at the end of this sectionl,the
proposed proiect cannot meet some of the requirements in Section 18.755.050 without reducin�the
productive space of the proposed proiect and/or impactinQ the sidewalk on the north side of the
buildin�.
Pride Disposal, the franchised hauler that will serve the proposed proiect, has been contacted re�ardin�
the proposed qroiect and plans have been reviewed and approved.The Applicant worked with the
franchised hauler to develop a plan for stora�e and collection of source-separated recvclable and solid
waste expected to be senerated from the proposed proiect. Pride Disposal indicated that recvclin�
service to the proposed qroiect would require the use of a commercial sized recvclin�container.The
proposed stora�e area cannot accommodate the containers repuired for both recvclin�and solid waste,
and expandin�the stora�e area would si�nificantly reducin�the qroductive space of the proposed
proiect and/or impact the sidewalk on the north side of the buildin�. It was a�reed that Applicant will be
responsible for storin�source-separated recvclables inside the buildin�and the trash enclosure will be
used for solid waste. The Applicant will be responsible for removin�the source-separated recvclables
and Pride Disposal will be responsible for haulin�the solid waste from the exterior stora�e area.
Note: The proqosed proiect meets the specific requirements of the "minimum standards method" in
Section 18.755.040.5.b(51,which indicates that the 13.200 sf proposed prolect must provide a minimum
stora�e are of 62.8 sf(10 square feet plus 4 square feet/1,000 sf GFA).The exterior stora�e area
proposed for the praiect is 112.5 SF (12'—6" bv 9'—0"1 which meets the minimum requirement.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 12
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas
RESPONSE: The trash enclosure for the proposed proiect meets the location standards defined in
section 18.755.050.8, except as modified with the approval of the franchise hauler, as follows:
1. The trash enclosure on the north side of the buildin�will contain solid waste. Pride Disposal, the
franchise hauler, approved the service plan which indicates that the Applicant will be
responsible for storin�and removin�source-separated recvclables (see Section 18.755.040
above .
2. Indoor and outdoor stora�e areas are desi�ned to complv with Uniform Buildin�and Fire Code
requirements.
3. Stora�e area space requirements for the solid mixed waste will be satisfied with a sin�le,
exterior location. Recvclables will be stored inside the buildin�.
4. The exterior trash stora�e area is located within the interior side vard area. No exterior stora�e
areas are proposed within a required front yard setback or in a vard adiacent to a public or
private street.
5. The exterior trash stora�e area is located on the north side of the buildin�in an area that is
visible from the parkin� lot and loadin�area, which will provide securitv for users;
6. The exterior trash stora�e area is not Iocated in the parkin�area.The stora�e areas will be
a�propriatelv screened accordin�to the provisions in 18.755.050.C,desi�n standards(see
Section 18.755.050.0 below);
7. The exterior trash stora�e area is desi�ned to be accessible for collection vehicles and has been
located so that it will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on
public streets adiacent to the site.The stora�e area is located adiacent to the qarkin�area and is
desi�ned not obstruct traffic. When collection trucks are present the drive aisle of the parkin�
lot, at 24 feet wide,will provide enouah room for vehicles to pass.A sidewalk is continuous
alon�the north side of the buildin�and is not obstructed bv the storage area.
The trash enclosure for the proposed proiect meets the applicable desi�n standards defined in section
18.755.050.C, except as modified with the approval of the franchise hauler, as follows:
1. The dimensions of the proposed trash stora�e area accommodate container5 consistent with
current methods of local collection.
2. Stora�e containers will meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with
waterproof materials.
3. The proposed exterior trash stora�e area is enclosed bv the scene shop to the west and a
masonrv wall (6'—8" hi�h) and a �ate (6'—0" hi�h), which meets the six-foot hei�ht
reauirement. The proposed �ate openin� is 6'—8" wide,which has been approved bv Pride
Disposal.The width of the�ate openin� is constrained bv the need to maintain an adepuate
sidewalk width between the buildin�and the parkin�on the north side.The�ate will be capable
of bein�secured in a closed and open position;
4. The stora�e area and all containers will be clearlv labeled to indicate the tvpe of materials
acceqted.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 13
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
The trash enclosure for the proposed proiect meets the access standards defined in section
18.755.050.D, as follows:
1. Access to the proposed exterior trash stora�e area will likelv be limited for securitv reasons.
However, the stora�e area will be accessible to users at convenient times of the dav. and to
collection service personnel on the dav and approximate time thev are scheduled to provide
collection service;
2. The proposed exterior trash stora�e area is desi�ned to be easilv accessible to collection trucks
and equipment.The stora�e area is uncovered and truck access is from the paved parkin�area.
There are no si�nificant�rade impacts.
3. The proposed exterior trash stora�e area will be accessible to collection vehicles without
repuirin� backin�out of the drivewav onto a public street. The collection vehicle will be able to
enter the parkin� lot on the north side of the buildin�, collect the trash and continue around the
parkin� lot to exit on the south side of the buildin�.
18.765.030 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements - General Provisions
RESPONSE:The proposed proiect meets the applicable requirements in section 18.765.030 as follows:
Vehicle parkin�plan repuirements. Scaled plans are enclosed that show how access, e�ress and
circulation requirements are met bv the proposed proiect.
Location of vehicle parkin�.The location of off-street parkin�will be as follows:
• All off-street parkin�for the proposed proiect is provided on the proiect site.
• No ioint use parkin� is proposed for the proiect.
• The parkin�area is not proposed to provide more than 20 lon�-term parking spaces
The parkin�area provides two (2) disabled parkin�spaces measured at 19'—0" bv 9'—0" with an 8-foot
striped loadin�area, which meets the requirements specified bv the State of Ore�on Uniform Buildin�
Code and federal standards. The disabled parkin�space svmbol will be painted on both spaces and the
appropriate si�ns will be posted as required bv these re�ulations.
The parkin�area will contain 79 parkin�spaces (less than 250 spacesl on a surface lot (not a parkin�
structure), therefore a DEQ indirect source construction permit is not required.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 14
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.765.040 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements -General Design Standards
The proposed parkin�area will be kept clean and in�ood repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces
will be repaired promptiv and broken or splintered wheel stoqs will be replaced so that their function
will not be impaired.
Access drives.
1. The access drives from the street to the off-street parkin�area have been desi�ned (and will be
constructed) to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safetv for pedestrian and
vehicular traffic on the site. Painted crosswalks will provide safe crossin�s for pedestrians across
the access drives, and painted directional arrows will direct traffic in a clear manner.
2. The number and size of access drives are in accordance with the re4uirements of Chaqter,
18.705,Access, E�ress and Circulation (see Section 18.705 abovel.
3. The access drives will be clearlv and permanently marked with direction arrow stripin�.
4. The access drives have been desi�ned to have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with
Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance (see Section 18.795.040 below).
5. The access drives will be improved with an asphalt pavin�surface which has been desi�ned (and
will be constructed and maintained)to remain well-drained (see Section 18.810.100 and
enclosed plansl.
6. The proposed parkin�area will be served bv a service drive so that no backin� movements or
other maneuverin�within a street or other public ri�ht-of-wav will be required.The service
drive is entered from the north side of the buildin�and circles to an exit on the south side of the
buildin�.
Loadin�/unloadin�drivewavs.The drive aisle in the parkin�area is desi�ned for continuous forward flow
of passen�er vehicles for the purpose of loadin�and unloadin�passen�ers at or near the buildin� lobbv.
Vehicles will be able to enter the parkin�area on the north side of the buildin�and circle to the lobbv at
the southeast corner of the buildin�to drop off passen�ers and then continue the exit on the south side
of the buildin�, or to an available parkin�spot.
Drive-in services are not proposed for the proiect; Section 18.765.040.D is not applicable.
Curb cuts. Curb cuts will be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N (see Section 18.810.030 below).
Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access throu�h the proposed qarkin�area will be qrovided in accordance
with Section 18.705.030.F (see Section 18.705.030.F abovel. The proposed parkin�area does not have a
drop-off�rade separation.
Parkin� lot landscaqin�.The landscaqin�qlan proposed for the aarkin�meets the re4uirements of
Chapter 18.745 (see Section 18.745 above).
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 15
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
Parking space surfacin�. The proposed parkin�area will be imqroved with an asphalt pavin�surface
which has been desi�ned (and will be constructed and maintained)to remain well-drained (see Section
18.810.100).
Parkin� lot stripin�. The proposed parkin�area will have all parkin�spaces clearlv marked, and all
interior drives and access aisles will be clearlv marked and si�ned to show direction of flow and maintain
vehicular and pedestrian safetv.
Wheel stops.All proposed new parkin�spaces are provided with a 6" concrete curb,which will serve as
wheel stops for vehicles.The front three feet of the parkin�stall will either be concrete or lawn that
does not exceed the hei�ht of the wheel stop.
Draina�e. Off-street parkin�and loadin�areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications
approved bv the Citv En�ineer to ensure that ponds do not occur(see Section 18.810.100 and enclosed
plansl. Concrete curbs surroundin�the parkin�area, proper gradin�to catch basins, and curb cuts to
allow water flow to the detention pond will direct draina�e to avoid flow of water across public
sidewalks.
Li�htin�. New exterior li�htin�will be qrovided on a desi�n-build basis. Li�htin�for the parkin�area will
be arran�ed to direct the li�ht away from the adiacent residential district.
Si�ns. Si�ns that will placed in the qarkin�area will be desi�ned and installed in accordance with Chapter
18.780, Si�ns.
Space and aisle dimensions. All new, non-disabled parkin�spaces in the proposed proiect are
dimensioned at 8.5' X 18.5,which meets the requirements for standard spaces(see enclosed site plan).
Two (2) disabled parkin�sqaces are provided and dimensioned (19'—0" bv 9'—0"with an 8-foot striped
loadin�area) as required bV the ADA.The disabled parking space svmbol will be painted on both spaces
and the appropriate si�n will be posted.
The proposed drive aisle is desi�ned to be able to accommodate two direction traffic, or allowin�access
from both ends.The drive aisle is 24 feet in width;
18.765.050 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements - Bicycle Parking Design Standards
RESPONSE: Per Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. of the TMC, required bicvcle parkin� is 1.0/10
seats for Maior Event Entertainment use.This proqosed proiect includes 236 permanent seats and
requires 24 bicvcle parkin�spaces. Two (2) bicvcle racks holdin� 15 bikes each have been located within
50'from the main door(see enclosed Site PIan1.The racks are convenientiv located adiacent to the
buildin� in areas protected from automobile traffic.The bicvcle parkin�areas are not located within
parkinQ aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian wavs. Both bicvcle racks are visible from the buildin�and
one is visible from SW Grant Avenue.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 16
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
The racks will ensure that bicvcles mav be securelv locked to them without undue inconvenience, and
the racks will be securelv anchored to the�round. Each bicvcle parkin�sqace is at least 2%feet bv six
feet lon�, and an access aisle of at least five feet wide will be provided and maintained beside or
between each row of bicvcle parkin�. Each required bicvcle parkin�space will be accessible without
movin�another bicvcle.The areas set aside for reauired bicvcle parking will be clearly reserved for
bicycle parkin�onlv.
The bicycle parkin� racks are located on a concrete paved area that will be desi�ned and maintained to
remain well-drained.
Th_e applicable requirements in Section 18.765.050 are met.
18.765.070 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements - Minimum and Maximum Off-Street
Parking Requirements
RESPONSE: Per Table 18.765.2 the qroposed proiect has a minimum requirement of 1.0 parkin�
spaces/3 seats and a maximum allowed qarkin�of 1.0 spaces/2.5 seats. There are 236 qermanent
theatre seats proposed for this proiect,which requires a minimum of 79 parkin�spaces and allows a
maximum of 94 parkin�spaces. A total of 93 parkin�spaces(31 existin�and 62 new) are currentiv
proposed and shown on the preliminarv plan for this proiect.The qroposed parkin� meets both the
minimum and maximum parkin� requirements.
18.765.080 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS
Every COMMERClAL OR lNDUSTRIAL BUlLD1NG!N EXCE55 OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET shal!be provided with
a loading space. The space size and location shal!be as approved by the City Engineer.
RESPONSE: One loadin�space sized at 34'—0" bv 18'—6" is proqosed for the north side of the buildin�.
The space size and location is to be approved bv the Citv En�ineer.
18.780 Signs
SlGNS PERMlTS MUST BE OBTAINED PRlOR TD lNSTALLATION OF ANY SI6N in the City of Tigard. A
"Guidelines for Sign Permits"handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond
Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposa!is reviewed as part of a development review
application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review.
RESPONSE: A si�n permit will be obtained prior to installation of anv si�n on the proposed proiect.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 17
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.790.030 Tree Removal -Tree Plan Requirement
RESPONSE: Every effort is bein� made to preserve and protect existin�trees on the propertv.A tree
plan for the qlantin�, removal and protection of trees prepared bv a certified arborist is included with
the enclosed plans. The tree plan addresses all the repuirements outlined in Section 18.790.030,
includin� (1) the identification of the location, size and species of all existin�trees includin�trees
desi�nated as si�nificant bv the citv; (2) the identification of a pro�ram to save existin�trees; (31
identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed, and (4) a protection pro�ram definin�
standards and methods that will be used bv the applicant to protect trees durin�and after construction.
The certified arborist determined that, qer section 18.790.030.6.2.d., miti�ation is not required since
this proiect will retain over 75%of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper(the proiect will preserve 6
out of 7 trees(85%) over 12" dbh on the site).
The applicable requirements in section 18.790.030 are met.
18.790.060.E Tree Removal -Mitigations
RESPONSE: Ever�r effort is bein� made to preserve and protect existin�trees on the propertv.A tree
plan for the plantin�, removal and protection of trees prepared bv a certified arborist is attached to this
application, and addresses all the tree plan requirements outlined in Section 18.790.030.The certified
arborist determined that miti�ation is not reauired.The proiect will preserve 6 out of 7 trees(85%) over
12" dbh on the site_(one tree that is bein� removed because it stands in the wav of the new lobbvl.
Accordingthe Citv of Ti�ard Code section 18.790.030.B.2.d., if over 75%of the trees over 12" dbh are
retained, miti�ation plantin� is not required.
18.795.040 Visual Clearance Areas-Computations
RESPONSE: The two intersections of the parkin�drivewavs and SW Grant Avenue (a non-arterial streetl
are desi�ned to maintain a visual clearance area that meets the requirements in Section 18.795 of the
TMC(see enclosed site planl.The two le�s of the clear vision trian�les will be 30 feet in distance from
the intersection of the drivewavs and SW Grant Avenue.These clear vision areas will contain no vehicle.
hed�e, fence, wall structure or temporarV or permanent obstruction--except for an occasional li�htin�
pole or tree.The clear vision area requirements are met bv the proposal.
18.810.030 Street and Utility Improvement Standards-Streets
RESPONSE: The proposed proiect site has fronta�e on two public streets: SW Grant Avenue and SW
School Street. Please note that the deed for a lot line adiustment between the Proiect Site and the
�ro�erty to the south (2S102CB00200)alon� HiQhwav 99W has been recorded with Washin�ton Countv
City of Tigard land Use Application Page � 18
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
(see attachmentl. As a result,the Proiect Site no lon�er abuts SW Hi�hwav 99.The existin�SW Grant
Street cul-de-sac bulb has been approved bv the Citv and meets the applicable street improvement
standards in Section 18.810.030. In accordance with Table 18.810.1, SW Grant Street cul-de-sac bulb has
a ROW width of at least a 47' radius, and the pavement width is exceeds the 40' radius requirement. In
accordance with Section 18.810.030.N,grades do not exceed 12%. And in accordance with Section
18.810.030.0, concrete curbs, curb cuts, ramps and drivewaV apqroaches have been constructed in
accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080.The qroposed proiect will
preserve all existin� improvements.
Applicant acknowled�es that to meet the requirements of Section 18.810.030 the proposed proiect will
be required to make a ri�ht-of-wav dedication on SW School Street. A seven foot ri�ht-of-wav dedication
will be made alon�the portion of SW School Street that abuts the Proiect Site (see enclosed Ri�ht-of
Wav Dedication Plan).
Applicant acknowledges that street improvements are a standard requirement of the Citv, and that the
required exaction (of both ROW dedication and public improvements) shall be directiv related to and
rou�hly proqortional to the impact of the proposed development.The proposed proiect will provide
street improvements alon�the qortion of SW School Street that abuts the Proiect Site, as determined bv
the Citv En�ineer to be a condition of approval.
The Applicant acknowled�es that the apqroval authoritv mav also apqrove adiustments to the standards
of Section 18.810.030 if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on
existin�development or would preclude development on the property where the development is
proposed. In approvin�an adiustment to the standards,the aparoval authoritv shall balance the benefit of
the a�ustment with the impact on the public interest represented bv the standards. In evaluatin�the
impact on the public interest,the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030
E.1. An adiustment to the standards mav not be�ranted if the adiustment would risk public safetv.
It is expected that per section 18.810.030.AC of the TMC, a traffic studv will not be required for the
proposed proiect.The proposed proiect does not meet any of the circumstances that would require a
traffic studv, as follows:
• It is expected that the proiect will not�enerate a 10%or�reater increase in existin�traffic to a hi�h
collision intersection identified bv Washin�ton Countv.The intersection of SW Walnut Street and
SW Pacific Hi�hwav is not believed to be a hi�h collision intersection.
• Trip�enerations from the development onto Grant Street at the qoint of access are not expected to
fall within the lowest ran�e that would tri��er a traffic report (avera�e dailv trips of SOOvpd or
more). The new theatre will have 236 qermanent theatre seats and office space for 6 administrative
staff. Shows are planned for evenin�s Thursdav—Saturdav and for Sundav matinees.Therefore,
even if each theat_re patron and staff person drove separatelv to the Proiect Site each dav, less than
500 vpd would be�enerated bv the proposed proiect.
Therefore,a traffic studv should not be required for the proposed proiect.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 19
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.810.050 Street and Utility Improvement Standards- Easements
RESPONSE. The Applicant will provide any and all easements as required in Section 18.810.050.
18.810.070 Street and Utility Improvement Standards-Sidewalks
RESPONSE: Existin� sidewalks alon�SW Grant Avenue will be preserved.There are no existin�sidewalks
on either side of School Street.The qroposed proiect will provide street improvements (which mav
include sidewalksl alon�the portion of SW School Street that abuts the Proiect Site, as determined bv
the Citv En�ineer to be a condition of aqproval (see section 18.810.030 above), subiect to rou�h
proportionalitV.
Tfjp generations from the proposed proiect are not expected to reach 1,000 vehicle trips or more per
dav. The new theatre will have 236 permanent theatre seats and office space for 6 administrative staff.
Even if each theatre qatron and staff person drove seqaratelv to the Proiect Site each dav, less than 500
v�d would be�enerated bv the proposed proiect.Therefore,Apqlicant is not required to identifv direct,
safe (1.25 x the strai�ht line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit
facilities and Nei�hborhood Activitv Centers (schools, parks, libraries,etc.1,or to participate in the
removal of any�aps in the pedestrian svstem off-site if iustified bv the development.
The Propertv Owner and/or Applicant will provide continuous maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and
planter strips alon�the Proiect Site.
18.810.090 Street and Utility Improvement Standards-Sanitary 5ewers
RESPONSE: The proposed proiect will use the existin�sewer connection between the existin�8-inch
qublic sewer in SW Grant Avenue and the existin� buildin�. The existin� lines will be field located and
qrotected. A test will be conducted usin�existin�facilities inside of the buildin�to make sure the
existin�connection does not require anv improvements.This proposal is subiect to the Citv En�ineer's
approval.
Over-sizin� has not been considered since no new sewer svstem is bein�proposed.
The Applicant acknowled�es that development permits may be restricted bv the Commission or
Hearin�s Officer where a deficiencv exists in the existin�sewer svstem or portion thereof which cannot
be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or
safetv, surchar�in�of existin� mains,or violations of state or federal standards pertainin�to operation
of the sewa�e treatment svstem.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 20
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
18.810.100 Street and Utility Improvement Standards-Storm Drainage
RESPONSE• A private water qualitv and detention pond is proposed for the east side of the proqertv to
collect stormwater run-off from the new impervious surfaces of the proposed proiect. Stormwater from
the new parkin�will be collected in area drains and directed to the detention qond.The stormwater will
then be discharged into the existin�public storm manhole located in SW Grant Avenue. Stormwater
from the new scene shop will be collected in a roof drain and will also be dischar�ed into the existinQ
storm manhole Two of the existin�catch basins in the existin�parkin�area will be retained and
protected A proposed storm draina�e ptan is included with the enclosed plans.The storm water
draina�e svstem is separate and independent of the sanitarv sewera�e svstem.The�radin�and storm
water draina�e svstem is desi�ned so that surface water is not carried across anv intersection or allowed
to flood any street.This stormwater svstem has been desi�ned to satisfv the CWS and Citv of Ti�ard
requirements for water qualitv and detention facilities (see enclosed sheet C2.1 UtilitY Improvements
Plans and Draina�e Reportl.
The Proiect Site is not traversed bv a watercourse draina�ewav,channel or stream.Therefore no storm
water easement or draina�e ri�ht-of-wav is required for the proposed proiect.
The applicable requirements in Section 18.810.100 are met.
18.810.120 Street and Utility Improvement Standards-Utilities
RESPONSE• All utilitv lines includin� but not limited to those required for electric, communication,
li�htin�and cable television services and related facilities will be placed under�round, except for surface
mounted transformers surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which will be placed
above�round Care has been taken to ensure that above Qround equipment does not obstruct vision
clearance areas for vehicular traffic(see section 18.795.040 abovel. Stubs for service connections will be
lon�enough to avoid disturbin�the street improvements when service connections are made.
The existin� utilitv lines run overhead alon�SW Grant Avenue until thev reach the subiect propertv.
There is one final overhead utilitv pole on the west side of SW Grant Avenue at the propertv line.The
power lines are under�round to a vault on the west side of the Grant Avenue roundabout.The proposed
proiect will be tappin� into the existin�electrical vault and will keep the power lines under�round until
thev reach a new transformer at the northwest corner of the scene shop. It is exqected that no fee
associated with overhead utilitv lines will be charQed to this proiect.
The Applicant will provide any and all easements as required
The applicable requirements in Section 18.810.120 are met.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 21
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-OD002
I
OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE
CLEANWATER SERVICES BUFFER STANDARDS(CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations—Chapter 3)
CWS Service Provider Letter:
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider
Letter which wi/l outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&0 07-20 sensitive area
requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider
Letter is not required.
RESPONSE: The Sensitive Area Pre-Screenin�Site Assessment Form has been completed and is enclosed
with this application.
WATER SUPPLY
The City of Tigard(Phone: (503) 639-4171J provides public waterservice in the area of this site. This
service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed
development.
RESPONSE: The Citv of Ti�ard has been contacted re�arding water supplv for the proposed prolect.
Plans will be reviewed.
FIRE PROTECTION
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District(South DivisionJ(Contact:John Dalby, (503J 356-4723J provides
fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information
regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to
fire protection.
RESPONSE:Tualatin Vallev Fire and Rescue District has been contacted re�ardin�fire protection services
for the proposed proiect. Plans will be reviewed.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
RESPONSE: Traffic Impact Fees will be paid as required by the City of Ti�ard.
PERMITS
RESPONSE: All required permits will be obtained for the proposed proiect.
City of Tigard Land Use Application Page � 22
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
12850 SW Grant Street-CUP2007-00002
•
e �
o r U�
, ,
Pe
,� o � e
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
June 14, 2007
RE: Broadway Rose Theatre
Dear Interested Party:
I am representing the owner(Tigard-Tualatin School District) and lessee (Broadway Rose
Theatre Company) of the property located at 12850 SW Grant Ave., Tigard, OR 97223. We are
proposing to convert the old cafetorium at CF Tigard Elementary School into a new theatre for
the Broadway Rose Theatre Company. The theatre would be a conditional use for the property.
Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, we would like to
discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are
invited to attend a meeting on:
Monday, July 2, 2007
Library at CF Tigard Elementary School
12855 S.W. Grant Ave. —Tigard, Oregon 97223
6:00 PM
Please notice that this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be
altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city.
We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at(503)
242-0084 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,�
�-
` ,) �,i7
.�` .G
Fran�e'sca Gambetti
'Project Manager �
Attachments:
Vicinity Map
Neighborhood Meeting Information (pages 3 and 4)
•
Broadway Rose Theatre Project
Vicinity Map
. _ . .
. MA+'QVEST�� Sw`Meadow St Y' _�(l� ,_ ' � ��
_✓ __.._._...__�-..�.��� � ' _., : -, _ ��—����
��� �. _._.i , ._.____ .�;�'� S+y � s � f�
� � � r�� � �� � _y��,���
r�.:,� _..,�� _cej?r�. � :
�, sy, ; ~'-�_-
� �_._._�_ I t; ,�• ��:�� ��`����:�'�-
Iw"� #'��--, �y. �Q.,; ' `�... ``�°�.
• , _� ;_,�,. ,, ,�
St �'; —`�"``. �:
Sw Wa Inut 5t i ;� ��,��, _ > �,�� �r'"`:�,,.�`
....�._..._. _ .__._��._.__.,,_,,,,,b_.rt,�_ . , ` `" �,�>,` ._ � Y
�, �„� �����s _ ', �,., -r, - r
�„�«� �_..._..� �' ��� 't`'. \. �A� � .�,
�`a':- 'Y �� ,-�.. `.�,,.�� ��^�� � � V �tifl A�.
s : > '..:_ � �A .
Sw Errol 5t ,T,�,_,.,_�_�,� Y 1 ��/i�� �f1Jl' , ��a� � y ����aP ��
__ ���'�,F -v� ��� `����
_._.____,� ",; '�,,`` ` rp� �� '�,��,+ �
- �?
�° ' _� _- ,� '� _.;���S � - �� J .
4 �� �Q.; ,� . �ti
. � �... �" r'
,�
. " _"
�r �
Y, ,N��ry ; ,�r .0 .' _
�� � � f �� �� �
� - ��-- - ���� - � �a' � 'y�� '��;�M. ,� ,� '��, . . �
.. � ,� �,� :5,1 ^„�\.� f�� .� � � .
' rd j�
� � �' � _ _ '�`�`� o .
.
_ . _ � � �y�� � `'`�,,�,= -� _,
�,. � ;� � , f� �i�r ��_ � ��
� 4 �
i �y'
/y v � �
_...,� _�. ,� ' �'� �,'�,� , , .`�,w t'' »., ��'• f'+9IfR�
� �`� ��'n-=. "-- vy � - .,�• �Sr �r'` .!�'r��- �' �`� �` Park
�'�.� ,T
''°;,� � � � Es. //��� �',ry ,.�'� �h
` � �'y, � � h�
� � -. e ��.�... ..,...p.. . .,µ'� , �� .e.����...� � �-.i-� .. .. Of� � ,.� �`�
�
� �
_ 5w Cook Ls; r ��,�
`r�
� �! , '� `�c� � _ _ f e�'� � �`� p° ";. `� _ s� <<��',
�+ � � £ , �,,ce��: ,�.. , .�. -,.
� �' , Sw Ort�ara St
� .�.� ' _..�__._._ �5w�a�fiave+�St � � �--�pypr��,pK , � �.___ _____�....�
. �/!1 �_..._�...�� �. . �... � I LJ�Y- . . �,,�,•s`,t
f �r 7�" /
r
; : � � ..:'� �. : , .
, . , . . � ,�' l .
. _....,.,_,,, � _ ��� � �= .
, ...-�. , . . "F.
_ _. z , ����,,��
'' S�r.Edgewood St
.� _... --_ __
�'+2a[i7.M�p�2t�est,�►c,_ r ,--°"°�,i. . 0240?N'�iVTEQ
Site proposed for the
Broadway Rose Theatre
� 12850 SW Grant St
Tigard, OR 97223
NEIGHB�RH�OI� MEETING INFORMATION
�� ?�s part of the de�-elopment re�-iew proce:s for most land use applications, the Cin- of TiJard
: - '. requires that de�Telopers hold a neighboL�ood meeting to norify and discuss with propern-
owners in the area, dleir proposed development. Below are some frequently asked qne�nons
; � �" about the neighborhood meeting proces�.
� _�
�UHAT IS THE PtiRPOSE OF THI� \�EIGHBORHOOD �IEETIi�1G?
The purpose of the meeting is to allo�v the prospective de�eloper to share with you what they are planniug to do.
This is your opportunity to become infomied of their proposed development and to let them know�hat issues or
concems you have in regard to their proposal.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE I�7EIGHBORHOOD �fEETING?
_�fter the neighborhood meeting, the prospecnve developer finalizes their submittal package (often t�kinQ into
account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the City. Sometimes it takes a while before the de�-eloper's
application is ready to submit, so thexe could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the
submittal of an application.
Once an application is submitted to the Citp, Staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been
deemed complete, the formal application re�-iew begins. It takes appro�ciinately 6-8 weeks from the time the
application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many t�-pes of applications require a public hearing at u-hich
citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concems. Property owners within 500 feet�-ill be
notified after a complete application is submitted. They«-ill be provided an opportunity to comment l�nc appeals
are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code.
WHAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WK�T IS
ACTUALLY SUBMITTED?
Applicants are not required to submit exacrl�-�vhat was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally
follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues
and address other changes necessitated by the development or staf£ If the project is significantly different, a new
neighborhood meeting would be required as determined by staff.
HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID?
A decision is reviewed based on compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Kevielv the city.r development code to
familiari�eyourSelf with what i,r permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for
viewing at the Tigard City Library, on the Ciry's web site at w�vw.ci.tigard.or.us, or a copy may be purchased at the
Commuruty Development Services counter. You may also contact city planning staff and ask what rhe standaxds
are for a specific issue. Be prepared, however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you know what
they are. If a development meets the code standaxds,it can proceed.
For your assistance, attached is a list compiled of helpful questions to ask that may assist you in
determining your position on a particular proposal.
Page 3
QUESTIONS TO ASK OF TYPICAL NEIGHBORHOOD
.�� CONCERNS, TO vIAKE SURE YOUR CONCERNS ARE
:�;�`=' CONSIDERED
�:�":
� �- ` The follo�ving is a list of questions inte�ded to aid you in formulating your own quesaons for
� „� " :��< proposed de�-elopment in �-oui area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to acciress your
.-�� �=.>
�„- -� � ,
�=��' =*��-v; own uni ue concerns and uiterests.
PROCESS
/ What applications are you (the de��eloper) apply-ing for? When do you e�pect to submit the applicanon(s) so
that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal?
► Will the decision on the application be made by City �taff, Hearings Officer, Planning Conunission or City
Council? How long is the process? (tuiun�
► At what point in the process are citizens gii en norice and the oppoYtunit�- to provide input?
► Has a pre-application conference been held with Cit�- of Tigard staff?
■ Have any preluivnary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified?
• What city planner did you speak�vith regarding this project? (This person is generally the planner assigned
to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information).
STREETS
1 Will there be a traffic study done? What is the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the
development and how do you propose to mitigate the unpacts if necessary? _
► What street unprovements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to e�sting streets are
proposed?
/ Are streets proposed to be public or pri�-ate? What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths?
/ What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements?
ZONING AND DENSITY
► What is the current zoning? What uses are allowed under this zoning?
/ Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to�vhat zone?
► How many units are proposed for the decelopment and what is the minimum and maximum number of units
allowed in the zone?
DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY
/ What is your erosion control and drainage plan? What is the natural slope of the property? What aze the
grading plans?
/ Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who �-ill own
and maintain the facility?
TREES AND LANDSCAPING
► What are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed?
1 What are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
/ How do I request more informatton or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant?
i\cucpin\mastecs\neighborhood meeangs\neighborhood meenng infocmation_quesnons.doc
Page 4
-�--- ``Y.
ent � SHIELSOBLETZJOHN 5032996769; Jun-7-07 10:28AM; Page 2/2
�I�'Y 0� YIGARD . , �
� COM�9UNfTY QEYELQPMENT D�PARTMENT
?LANNI�iG DIYfS10h! . ��
I3 f ZS SW NAI� 80UtEYARD � �
. TIGARD, QREGON 97113
?HONE: iO3•b39�171 FA%: 503•624-3681 (Attn: PatiylPlanniag� � ' �
. ° � 0 ° a0 04 D ° 0 ° ° � . a 1
����1� �
�� �
� Proper�y owner infarmation is v�lid for 3 months from the date of your re uest �
q
INDICATE ALI. PROJ�CT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1 S134AB, Tax Lot OOi 00) OR THE
ADDRE5SES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS B�LOW:
. oQ �
P�,�ASE BF AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET� OF LABELS ,�yIL�, B� PROVIDED AT, THlS TiME FOi�
HQLDI(VG YOUR NEtGHBQRH00D M��TIN�. After subm�tting your land y$e ap�licaf�Qn to the C�ty, and
�he pra{ect planner has rev�ewed your appiicat�on far �completeness, you w�ll be nat�fied by means of art
mcompleteness letter ta obtain your 2 fina! sets o#labels. �
The 2 final sets of Eabels need to be piaced on envelopes (no self-adhes�ve env�Iopes lease) with frst
class I�f�er-rate,postage on.the envelopes �n the form ofi posta e stamps (n�,metered en�relopes and no
return address� and resubmitfed to the City.for th pur ose o� rovi��ng not�ce to p�Q perty owners of he
proposed ia�d use ap lication and th d�GS�on. �he �s��s o�envelo es must be kept separate. �he
person i�sted below w►IPbe cafled to pic�C up and pay for:the labels when t�iey are ready,
NAN1E 0� CaNTACT PERSON: �N�EJ�C-�.M-�l pH4NE:
�FAX: �-�'.� Z-�(.DS,, ,--
EMAIR; �nCe � .C�i,.�
��� rE livered to t e ity o Tigard, lease allow a
Galletl t pletion nf y�our request, the contact person wEl1 be
Qevelop n Wiil CaIP by their last narne, at the Gomrnunity
The co at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be
pre-det
P�,EAS Y, ON�Y O�RiGiNAL MAILIl�G LAB��S PR�VIU�D
A1L1N� LA��LS Wl��, B� AGC�P7ED,
cost Ues
$11 to ge onto{abels(24 addresses per sheet). �
Then, mu re uested. �
C4ST FQR THIS R�QU�ST
4 sheets of labels x$2Jsheei=� ,�00,x 2 sets= $16.00 �7� Q sheet(s)o(labels X$2/shaet=� � l ' � `����
. 1 sheeis of labels x$2/sheet for Intere9ted parties x 2 se�s= $ 4.00 x sets= /�� C� �
�sheet(s)af Iabels x$2lsheet for interested parties=$�x�sets= '. "-�
GENER,47�IIST z ,QQ
70TA� = 331,00 • . 'G�NERATE L1ST = ��1,U�
TOTAL = �—
_ �25 �.�
� �Q �/ �`�'' . � - .
W/q I1I (�FOGHA4'HIC IN�Of�MATiGN SVSILM
W
�
�'oo o , AREA NOTIFIED
�,, s,a � (5 00')
Cj� rnnu� \ -----------
!Q�' rturo �� mc --_____--__
���o��� n�� n� ,�„,,, FOR: Francesca
.�� � �,,, m� Gambetti
P P.�. .,�� n,n��m T �.�N��K� /i-
ne�na �� e�enw�n ����� II R E. 2 S�Q 2�8� ��0
e c Q
� m rc mem P �mo 2J�o2�C� CJ7�o
mcN mn�aMx m�� � -----------
�iK�17N u �����������
}fl�lK lpp��
-^, �� n�e
��� IftNN
V� aIf7KQ/N TdImC/OM �t�H
� �u
mnn.n� �"� '"'�e""' au S'T "'nn�"" � Property owner information
mn.e.n ��N o� is valid for 3 rnonths from
�Q�� °'° maam� � � the date printed on this map.
SSI�f�iRi/� Q�CWN
MOCM ril�lN�1}N
mcnw niaw�
m�m�ta� a�auw � tm�
Q� mmm�w mnr�::n mrnxn
mmemM Q-
MNlp�
marna —
WqrK�NS p mme� �m�rm marcw�� mau��
L ma�e rnerwe !��
mnaa� mmeas�o ap� maun� �A�
j��� u:esw� a "YG
�p IMC
mnu�� mnuuu� m� a � � �
�=�y mnaa� mnamn
— m�aewm m�aw�w
ma�a�w �s� ttiau�N
nm
ne�n � rn�
T ° muau:w �
I
CT �:N nuM�. � �
nu n����� ��.1'� ""' m�»� N
nwm �m
p/7iM
Kp Kp
aa�nw pp�� t 0 100 200 300 400 Feet
mnaow �
� mnaa�
1"=316 feet
1�lC�
�L nawr� nimur� —
N
ISIOlG�IMI ��/ �
�
�K ST PARK ST
-- InPormation on Ihis map is(or general location only and
should be veritied with the Development Services Dinsion.
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard,OR 97223
(50• •171
W I Mtp:Ov d.or.us
, Community G, �pment Plot date:Jun 15,2007;l. �ic\MAGIC03.APR
2S1028D-02800 2S102BD-02201
AFTER FIVE LLC CHALET VILLAGE LLC
10330 SW TUALATIN RD TWO CENTERPOINTE DR STE 210
TUALATIN, OR 97062 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
2S1Q26D-02700 2S102CB-00300
AFTE F LLC CHUNG HENRY&COMPANY
1033 TUALATIN RD BY CSK AUTO PROP MGMT
T ALATIN, 97062 PO BOX 19063
PHOENIX,AZ 85005
2S102BC-00115 2S102BC-08500
ARBUTHNOT STEPHEN P CIMPAN SIMION
7080 SW PALMER WAY 12750 SW WATKINS AVE
BEAVERTON, OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C6-06100 2S102BC-03800
ARNOLD LOURINDA J CLIFTON ROGER F
10455 SW GRANT CT SANDRA LEE
TIGARD,OR 97223 12840 SW WATKINS
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028C-03700 2S102C6-02400
BIGEJ KIMBERLY R CNL FUNDING 2000-A LP
12860 SW WATKINS AVE PO BOX 1671
TIGARD,OR 97223 ORLANDO,FL 32802
2S1026D-01001 2S 02C8-02500
BLINE RONALD G& CNL G 2000-A LP
SAGUN JUDITH L PO 71
2190 SKYLINE DR LANDO, 32802
SEASIDE,OR 97138
2S1026C-07300 2S1026C-00800
BRANCH MARCUS D COLLING CHARLES
12604 SW PATHFINDER CT 13835 SW HALL BLVD
PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028C-08400 2S1026D-00901
BURLESON STEPHEN M COLLING CHARLES W
12740 SW WATKINS AVE 13835 SW HALL
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026D-02200 2S1028D-02101
BUSCHA HELMUT AND ERIKA COMET CORPORATION
6215 SW 41 ST AVE BY WSCO PETROLEUM#225
PORTLAND, OR 97221 2929 NW 29TH
PORTLAND,OR 97210
251026D-02400 2S10 D-0200�-
CAMPBELL SANDRA RAE COME ORATION
12820 SW GRANT AVE BY WS ETROLEUM#225
TIGARD, OR 97223 292 W 29
P RTLAND,OR 97210
2S102BD-01200 2S102BC-04 0
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO FIN X
PO BOX 1539 P O 3562
PASO ROBLES,CA 93447 T ARD,�R 97223
2S102C8-03301 2S102BC-04305
DARROW DON S FINKE HANS C
9952 SW FREWING ST PO BOX 1565
TIGARD,OR 97223 WIL50NVILLE,OR 97070
2S102BC-OD113 25102BC-04307
DOHERTY JASON A& FINKE HANS C 8 SUSAN M
ZENA R PO BOX 1565
12570 SW BROOKSIDE AVE WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C6-00400 2S102BC-04300
ELWELL JOHN A FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN 8
10230 SW SCHOOL ST FINKE SUSAN M
TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S1026C-00903 2S102BC-04304
ENG TONY 8 CINDY L FINKE HANS-CHRISTIAN CUSTODIAN
PO BOX 23086 FOR FINKE NICHOLAS A
PORTLAND,OR 97281 PO BOX 1565
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
25102BC-03200 251026C-04306
EWELL LANNY W&MARIAN S FINKE LOTTI
12975 SW WATKINS AVE HANS-CHRISTIAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 P O BOX 23562
TIGARD,OR 97223 .
2S102BC-03600 2S1026C-04000
FIDLER GEORGE E JR 8� FLANAGAN PATRICK M&
MADELINE M A SCHMIDT LESLIE
PO BOX 230794 10560 SW PATHFINDER
TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-01702 251026C-07604
FIELD-EATON FREDERICK AND FORD JOSEPH E JULIE B
KRISTINE E PO BOX 230801
12680 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 1026 D-02300 2S 1 D2 BC-01400
FINGER FAMILY LIVING TRUST FRAZEE JOHN J JR&NOREEN L
BY FINGER ROGER A&PHYLLIS SAIKI 10250 SW WALNUT 5T
610 NW SPRING AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97229
2S1026C-04303 251028C-00901
FINKE ALEX FRIEDRICH SHERREE R
P O BOX 23562 12805 SW GRANT AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-04100 2S102BD-01900
FURINO RICK G&ERIN L HENDERSON MARILYN D HUDSON TR
� 12760 SW WATKINS AVE 11795 SW KATHERINE ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S102CB-00900 2 102C6-03101
GARGER JERRY E HE ERS MARILYN D HUDSON TR
13070 SW GRANT AVE 11795 THERINE ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TI RD,OR 97224
2S1026C-08100 25102BC-01608
GEORGE ERO E HERNANDEZ MARIA DELUZ
6065 165TH 12535 SW WATKINS AVE
ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-04301 2S102CB-01200
GEORGESON THEODORE& HESS DAVID A 8�GAIL K
GEORGESON KATHERINE 13170 SW GRANT AVE
SUITE 110-PMB 120 TIGARD,OR 97223
14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
2S102CB-05800 2S102C8-00500
GNAU MICHAEL F 8 ANGEL S HILCHEN PAUL&LEANN
10395 SW GRANT CT 10250 SW SCHOOL ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S7028C-03400 2S102C6-06200
GROAT RANDALL S&CAROLYN J HOROWITZ ALAN R AND
13010 SW WATKINS JUDITH BERMAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10475 SW GRANT COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026D-011D0 2S102C6-05700
HARDY GERALD T HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
120 RAINBOW DR PMB 2017 WASHINGTON COUNTY
LIVINGSTON,TX 77399 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L
HILLSBORO,OR 97124
2S1028C-00700 2 2CB-06600
HASSEL STEVEN F&STACEY L HOU G A ORITY OF
10115 SW WALNUT ST WASHI ON COUNTY
TIGARD,OR 97223 111 LINC ST#200-L
, LSBORO,OR 97124
2S1028D-02501 2S 2C6-06300
HATCHADOURIAN WENDY D HO G AUT RITY OF
12840 SW GRANT AVE WASHIN N COUNTY
TIGARD,OR 97223 111 LINCO 5T#200-L
� LSBORO,OR 97124
2S102CB-00302 2S102BC-07600
HELIOS PROPERTIES LLC HOYT ROBERT E&HELEN L
7366 SW IRON HORSE 12735 SW WATKINS AVE
WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102C8-00600 2S102BC-078D6
HUTCHISON DENNIS E 8 ELKE E KRALL FRED&PATRICIA HELEN
10270 SW SCHOOL ST 12560 SW PATHFINDER CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251026C-01700 2S103DA-D0100
JACKSON LINDA K LEPPER CHAD 8 MI YOUNG
12670 SW WATKINS AVE 13060 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1028C-02600 2S1026D-02100
JAMES ALAN K&JULIE A LIM KYUNG S
12875 SW WATKINS AVE 2006 SE 11TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97214
� 2S102BC-01101 2S102CB-00303
JARVIS MICHAEL LEE 8 MAKO PROPERTIES LLC
DIANNA C 14188 NW STONEBRIDGE DR
10120 SW WALNUT ST PORTLAND,OR 97229
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-03500 2S1D2BC-07500
JENSEN RONALD M& MARTIN DAVID K&SARAH H
JENSEN ERI K 12620 SW PATHFINDER CT
13000 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-00300 2S102C8-03200
JOHNSON LORREN MASSIH LLC
10155 SW WALNUT ST PO BOX 108
TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97075
2S1026C-03701 25102BC-02800
JOHNSTON ELSIE W MCCULLOCH GRANT H JR AND
12890 SW WATKINS SHIRLEY
TIGARD, OR 97223 12905 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-02500 2S1028C-08200
KACHLIK-NEWBERG LLC McDOWELL DEANNA L
911 SW BROADWAY DR 12745 SW WATKINS
PORTLAND, OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BD-02600 251028C-04400
KIM PENNEY MEERMANS MARY L
395 NW SILVERADO DR 10605 5W WATKINS PL
BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-08000 2S102BD-03100
KRAL GEORGE L&SARA MIDAS PROPERTIES INC
12765 SW WATKINS AVE REAL ESTATE ACCOUNTING DEPT
TIGARD, OR 97223 1300 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD
ITASCA, IL 60143
2S102CB-00800 2S1026C-01803
MIRANDA PEDRO 8� PHILLIPS WILLIAM C&LOIS J
SOFIA 20209 SW COMANCHE TER
12255 SW GREENBURG RD#17 TUALATIN,OR 97062
PORTLAND, OR 97281
2S1026C-01100 2S102BC-01701
MUMM RICHARD C QADIR RASHEED
75104 STAGE GULCH RD 6301 SW PALATINE#A28
PENDLETON, OR 97801 PORTLAND,OR 97219
2 S 102 B C-03702 2S 102 BC-01102
NEAL CHERYL L RESHEY MARILYN REV LIV TRUST
12880 SW WATKINS BY MARILYN LEE RESHEY TR
TIGARD,OR 97223 10160 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-07200 2S102CB-00700
NIDAY CATHERINE R REYNOLDS ROBERT W&SHARON J
12695 SW WATKINS ST 2245 SW MICHAEL DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068
2S102BC-07400 2S102BC-02400
NYDIGGER MARK A&YVONNE K RIZZUTTO CLYDE ALLEN
12630 SW PATHFINDER CT JULIE ANN
TIGARD,OR 97223 12805 SW WATKINS
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1o2CB-01100 2S1o26C-018o2
O'CONNOR S CASEY ROBINSON JEREMY J&LISA M
13150 SW GRANT AVE 12615 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1026C-03900 2S102BC-00114
PALM JULIE C ROSINSKI BARBARA E&
12820 SW WATKINS AVE AMLER SUSAN M
TIGARD, OR 97223 16307 SW 108TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S102BD-OD904 2S1028C-00701
PELLETIER PHILIP SAMUELS ROBERT C ROBIN R
8835 SW BELL FLOWER 8735 SW LEHMAN ST
TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223
2S1026D-00905 2S102BC-00900
PELLETIER PHILIP S SCHULZE LLOYD&EVELYN FAMILY T
8835 SW BELLFLOWER LN BY LLOYD H&EVELYN M SCHULZE TRS
TIGARD,OR 97224 8780 SW INDIAN HILL LN
BEAVERTON,OR 97008
2S103DA-00200 2S102BC-03300
PHILLIPS WILLIAM C SEINWERTH DANIEL TODD 8�
PO BOX 3642 THERESA MARIE
TUALATIN, OR 97062 13035 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 102C B-05900 2S 102C B-00100
SHEA JAMES C JR& TIG D-TU TIN SCHOOL
SUSAN K DISTRI #23J
10405 SW GRANT CT 696 W ANDBURG ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 97223
2S1026D-03200 2S 2BC-08700
SHULER GARY TIGA D-TU TIN SCHOOL
30790 NE FERNWOOD DISTR #23J
NEWBERG,OR 97132 6960 NDBURG ST
TI RD,OR 97223
251026C-043D2 251026C-01500
SPRINGER-GEORGESON KATHERINE& TINSLEY FRANK&VICKY
GEORGESON THEODORE 10270 SW WALNUT ST
14845 SW MURRAY SCHOLLS DR TIGARD,OR 97223
SUITE 110-PMB 120
BEAVERTON,OR 97007
2S102BC-01600 2S102C6-03000
STEVENSON THOMAS J/LAURI C TRAIN ARTHUR 8�
12660 SW WATKINS AVE CLINE MARY E
TIGARD,OR 97223 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102CA-01300 2S102BD-02900
SUSNJARA MARKO A/BETTY M TRUCK TERMINALS
16225 NE EUGENE CT 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY
PORTLAND,OR 97230 PORTLAND,OR 97229
2S102CB-01000 2S102BD-03000
SWEET JEFF TR T INALS INC
13130 SW GRANT AVE 1596 ULLAMORRIE WAY
PORTLAND,OR 97223 RTLAND, 97229
2S102BC-01800 2S102BC-01805
SWINFORD CLARK H& TUCK KARRY&VALERIE G
AMANDA K 12540 SW PATHFINDER CT
10330 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S1026C-00902 2S102BC-01200
TAYLOR JEFF R WALP GEORGIA J
12780 SW CREEKSHIRE DR 10200 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S102BC-01807 2S102C6-03300
THOMAS MARC C&CAROL A WALTER ANGELA D
10360 SW WALNUT ST 2863 RIVERWALK LP
TIGARD, OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97401
2S102C6-00200 2S10 CB-02600
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL WALT ELA D
DISTRICT#23J 2863 WALK LP
6960 SW SANDBURG ST E ENE,OR 7401
TIGARD,OR 97223
• 2 02C6-02700
WA TER GELA D
2863 ERWALK l.P
E ENE, R 97401
2S1026C-08300
WALTERS DONALD
12730 SW WATKINS AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S1o2BC-oo1o2
WEEKS CHERREE L&
WINTER RAVEN E
12595 SW BROOKSIDE AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
zs�azsc-azsoo
WILSON CLARENCE A AND
BETTY L
12831 SW WATKINS
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 02CB-07
WIN TERRACE OWNERS OF
ALL L
, 0
2S102BC-07100
WOLFORD WILLIAM K 8�NANCY RUTH
12687 SW WATKINS 5T
TIGARD,OR 97223
zsi ozec-aazoo
WOODARD CHARLES L ARLIE
10215 SW WALNUT AVE
PO BOX 23303
TIGARD,OR 97223
2sin� -o�soo
WOOD D ARLES L ARLIE
10215� ALNUT
PO � 233
TI ARD,�R 7223
2S1 D2C8-O6000
WOOLLETT THOMAS S
12700 SW 231 ST PL
HILLSBORO, OR 97123
2S1026C-01300
ZIGLIHSKI E PATRICIA
REVCABLE LIVING TRUST
BY E PATRICIA ZIGLINSKI TR
10230 SW WALNUT ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
�
� � �r� o0
,
� � �
r •
� � � !
AFFI� ��VIT OF MAILING/PL�TING
NEIGHBORHOOD l�IEETING NOTICE
I�IPORT�NT NOTICE: THE AI'PLICrL\�I' IS REQLJIRED TO NIAIL THE CITY OF TIG�RD .-� COPY OF
THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THr1T PE RTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE S.�.�iE TIME
PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOT'ICE,TO THE _�DDRESS BELOW:
' Ciri-of Ti�ard Plannina Di�7sion
� li L5 SW Hall Bou�evard
; Ti�arci,OR 9�223•8189
IV ADDITION,THE �I'PLIC.ANT SHr1LL StB�IIT THIS _�FFIDAVI'T &COPIES OF ALL NOTICES_aT THE
'� TIME OF APPLICATION.
iVIAILING:
I, Francesca Gambetti ,being�ul�•sROm,depose and sayrhat onthe 15th dayof �une ,
���L,I caused to have mailed to each of the persen, on the attached list,a nouce of a meeting to discuss a proposed de�-e:opment at
�or near) 12850 SW Grant Street. Ti gard, OR 972?3 ,a copyof�hich notice so mailed
is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
I fur�her state that said notices were enclosed in envelo�es�plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated
above in the United States Post Office located at SW Mdl ll d11d BY'OddWdY, Portl and, OR ,
R�th postage prepaid rhereon. �,
__ � /� �
i
Si�nature e presence of a Notary Public)
POSTING: _
I, Francesca Gambetti ,do atfi:n that I am(rep senc)the parryiniriating incerest in a proposed]and use applicauon
for C011d i ti Ondl u52 affecting rhe land located at(state the appro�imate
location(s) IF no address(s) and all tax lot(s) cur�endv�;istered) 12850 SW Grant Street, Ti qdrd, OR 97223
,and did on the 15 th day of J u ne ,20�_
personally post noace indicating that the site ma}'be pmposed for a c o n d i t i o n a 1 u S e land use application,and the time,
date and place of a neighborhood meer.ing to discuss the proposaL
The sign was posted at the roundabout i n front of the proposed bu i 1 di na at
Grant Street and on Hwy. 99
(stace locarion}�u posted nouce on proper[y)
� , 4
S' re (I the presence of a Notary Public)
(THIS SE CTION FOR A STATE OF ORE GON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOT:�RIZE)
STATE �F )
County of �1.V l�{�►ovr�a.l� ) ss.
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �.3Yd_ day of v � ,20�.
n 'cu�s�x
PAMEiA K.BREIMAN � � �
f�qr�mr Pv�C-0�ci0n
�vc�s.��a�+��� NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
�.+-. _ ..
� � My Commission Expires:
c\curpin\ttus[ers\neighborhood meetings\affidavic of mailing•posting neighborhoad meeting.doc
Page 5
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
MINUTES FROM NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
MEETING DATE: Monday, July 2, 2007 at 6:00 pm.
MEETING LOCATION: CF Tigard Elementary School - Library
ATTENDEES: See attached sign-in sheet
Francesca Gambetti introduced herself and Brisa Trinchero (Development Director) Dan Murphy
(General Director) of the Broadway Rose Theatre Company. She then read a description the
meeting's purpose that was provided by the city, and then presented preliminary plans for the project
and gave an overview of the proposed renovation/expansion of the existing cafetorium.
Questions and comments followed:
Q: Will there be an impact on our taxes?
A: No ta�c dollars will be spent
Q: What will be the hours of operation?
A: Performances will be held in the evenings Thursdays—Sundays, and there will be weekend
matinees. During the day it will be used by the 5 administrative staff.
Q: Will Broadway Rose use the adjacent field for events?
A: No. Concern was expressed that the balloon festival type noise would interrupt the
neighborhood if performances were outdoors but the point was made that all performances
will be inside—in fact, the theater will be making every effort to keep outside noise out of the
theater and inside noise in.
Q: Will other community events be held in the new space?
A: Yes, most likely.
Q: Will wine be served on the premises?
A: No. The school district will not permit alcohol to be served on their property.
Comment: Several people expressed excitement about the project and having The Broadway Rose in
the new facility.
Will all traffic come on Walnut Street? Yes
Q: Has a noise impact study been conducted?
A: No and it probably will not be required.
Q: How will the Broadway Rose Theatre Company be affected if the school district sells the bus lot?
A: It won't be affected at all.
Q: Will traffic increase on Grant Street?
A: Peak traffic generated by the school will not be impacted since shows start at 8:OOpm.
.
Q: What time do the shows end?
A: Typically at 10:30pm.
Comments: Several people expressed some concern about how much noise will be released into the
community. It was clarified that these will not be rock and roll shows. Many shows will be plays with
no music at all.
Q: Will the space be use for jazz bands?
A: The school may be in charge of that.
Comments: There were several positive comments made about the opportunity to have other
community events in the new space.
Q: Will there be enough parking?
A: Yes.
Comments: Francesca provided an overview of the application process.
Q: Will trees be removed along Hwy 99? When the school came down there was a lot of noise.
A: No trees along the edge ofthe property will be removed. A couple of smaller trees near the
building will be removed and replaced. Trees will be added to the property. There is a
requirement for 1 new tree for every 7 new parking spaces.
Q: Will you be doing anything to School Street?
A: The City may require the Broadway Rose to make some improvements to School Street in
the way of adding sidewalks or landscaping.
Comment: One resident living on School Street expressed concern that we would impact a big, old
tree on or near his property. He was concerned that sidewalks would run over the tree.
Q: Will there be coordination between school and Broadway Rose events?
A: Yes. Schedules must be coordinated to ensure that there will be enough parking for all
events on the property.
Q: What time will construction start?
A: Probably about 7am, though we're not sure what the City requires on that. Most of the
construction will take place inside the building. The entire construction period is expected to
be about 4 months.
Broadway Rose Theatre Company
Neighborhood Meeting
Sign-In Sheet
2 �uiy 2007
NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER EMAIL
� z7 70 �,c�, G'�t� �-� � v� S �� `��`l'-7 7 9
y � .�3 �3 9 S�7� Q,�,.w��. � �,1� . �
l aw �� � ��✓ �Y� G� y
/ /�I� ��� !S�-2(.z i ��(/ Gfc ��L�-/�K,��v a L; ��, L. .s'b�- � ��l-� 2 7 2�c.�-i�-� 9ro � . cv
�3�,� s�Z��
L�--^' v L�+`'>•'"Q�-1 �.�1`�o.f l!�J ct) (u��'N o lLC.f£
���y�,r.C�/�l�j�r�% /�/1� .f(� L'�'- C-� ��/ SG.� 7���G�
� f
����� � �� pa � � �'`� � �3 -�6 �-oo sL-
�-�
- �40 ,B�y �30�� �i���s�v
� ��"Ca.�d, `�"ias� �0 3 -Co 20 -o �L _E��� � �rf/v�r,t- �
7D ,
� �
� �
� �
•
�.
rv �
� � �
VV/ VVI LVUf 1 f .V�J .JUJ-LYV LVJ'Y ✓V LL..+lui� ui��:�i i��v � ��� ��r v�
RECEIVED 08/8B�2907 11:04 583-246-2094 AL DESIGN C�ZOUP INC
�AU$:_$__ ���1,-��:�5AM583- 2094 DL DE57GN C�ROUP ; N0. 2524 P...�E 82l03 �
`;"r�.l c��"� �� -�-� � t+y��.
. ' . . . ���(6 ��r ��., '. il.f ; ���� �. . �� t,.�°
�� : � �� � i� .'. ' • ��j' ' -
, ���• • • � ;
,, - -. AUG 1 2007 �i��� . , • . • . . .•
� �e�t�r�26�r � ��arv�� , . . : • . . - . • : �
Oiw ioVlaNlmEa�b e�tn. . By ..._,_ , �• 'eu nlor
. � - - , ' S�ns"�Sve 10.1r�sl�reS �reenlr�� 1,� • • �
�
' � . ' ' �Ito As�e9smen � .
Jurlsdiotivn: . , � , . .
Prc�p�r�y Inf on: (exam�►e 9�PS�li9o7aod� awner e�eomn�Hon: _ �1 �� ,
� re,d�,�j:�9�- '25�n2cBc�� ntaa„o:�'�►^, ,s��,� S"�"n , - _ .
�,,., - -
. i.p� Compar►y:
. ,qdd�s: s'�++ ' '
s�ada�: 13�zs S►�i« � � `� .� P�„� so �!3 00� 4. �� � � •
.,/. W
�f63t C�OS9�J�1'CC� � 7 � EMilall:_' . .
Devatoptr�nt AcNvlty� Chodc afl t►ua apPty APP���k m' tl � �
oe'
a,c�dllioR tc.�'8'mple•Fam►hr w�essiaa�oe trocHns,oaak,asraqs). ❑ ,,�n,e; L/� . �Sr��t„�„ . ' � , _' . - .
I.ot une o,djustm�t ❑ O+�n�Lend P�A�Iqon � � _ ' �
. .Rksl�entlal Crx+dominlum �❑ � Commerdal Condominium ❑ •Addre9s: 0 w 1�►� �� • S'�'� to
- Recldentia(subdA��� • ❑. Ccxnmiarcial subdivisiori • ❑ � � , , . -
Sli+gw t.ct Comme�� �� Mul�f � Carn rde/��,���i❑ nhonelFa�c `�0�=ar` � l -ZN — 04 .
� 'O1Hor �.A�L�!����_�� �-mPU: � . .
W7!ths proJeat iitvelve 01ty,a1��1��NOr1C: YG�Q NO U�krlown ❑ -C.e�oation and desctiption aF of[�erta worl(: ' �
�Addieionsl co�rm�nt4 ar i�ortnal�ain tt+s4 ntsy be naedtd td�od�rsbnd yns�r proJecN- �
Thu o 4oea NoT rep{acs dw Qood or Cra an n OenO'o►v+►mltr�Go11nw��Pe�mlta,ddldhep Permlb,��o.�eLopmoo!_
Rrmite,D�Q iZD9-C Permlt or olbs�p�[mlt��iesqoQ1�y fli�Depei(imen�of Envitonm��qu�ly�D2P�,���S1RtA Lsl1d9 ifNUO��P�eW1t Of
' fhe Army C4E All roqulted parn�itc And appr'e�k n�USt 6e o�f8inod and complem�7 under aOpIIc�M loral,stats,ana f�dsral lallv� .
' �ystQi�q d��lonn�1ho Ou�►►er�Owne�Y vudtotl�ed��ta�e�[eaent5tlw,aoknoMAacl�ee anA�s Ual em�tov�s of qearl waarSeMoes be�s mulhD�Ay
Qp��bt Ih!�1lO�pat c1E0 9t�Y fEQqtli�0 d106810!1lfe putpp60 0�41apsG1lRg pI9�B0�all0 b011d1�9 Q1C QEI�l6f�'KJ 1�Forma110n iolwted la IhA pfOJe¢E s�- 1 c8f0ly -
tlwt t am faml9ar Nkh 1ha k,fo�matlon ooMsY++d IA li�ts doaumenti�nd to tho boxi 9�MY W+�dYe!��IUK,th�s Infamr�an e w�y,cbn+W�.ane aawra�e. �
P(ipUT'ype Nam6: rt�f�!/fl- L•�S�C:��-�t.r�.� � vrinvey�e_rttt� ��f ry�rl . ,
r , ,� � . - , � . �u: � 0�` .
- aoR�tsraicT.us�oN�.1f • ' ' . ' �
❑ Sensitin,e�e�v pote�ially e�cls�n�site ot wlthl��00;of the sf1e. �HF APPIJCANL MUBT PE�RM A 51 ASSE68N16di .
I(Sensitiv8 Areas e�dSt on the SiEe Dr wlthJn 200 fee�.on
• � proPqn(�,A Ne�tlf�l RAO01iYCAe Asswemmt R�po�t moy e�t�o be t�equlretl. . -
� Basad on review of the suDmitled materiale and best aValE�tite inform2tlon�enaiEive a�ess do not Appear tts axlst oA eits�or
�qy�Zp0'et tha sil�, 'rns SrrslflvA lV6a Pr�-Sareai�np 9�llssaeament does NdT dfminaSe 1!v need fn avehate and
prote�t waier quallq��eneltiv��P•as M they�u+wb�6quendy dl�aovered� TF�Is dorume�will�srve a�y�a,�'savice F'rranaar
' �Oer as eequvea try,Resawon and�prder or�o,ser3lon n.Q.2.�..a1 raq►dred pormil��nd apprav�l.must ba•obteinad end
oomDleled�nder aDD��ble io�cal�S1ate�ana xedW�al lsw. . '' � , - � '
[� 6esed on review oi the aubmitfed matwias ar1Q be�t�v■�ab1e iMwma�on the ab�•►�erenoed projesrt wilt nat elgniq�tnly •
impeot the�dsting or poteintlelly settBltAro erea(s)fo�e�d naar She sits.'f11ig S�i1si[ivq A�a Pr�sere�nfng Slte A�maawnt
dnea�(allmina�e tho.n.ad fo awa�ue�to u+d protect addktenoi w�er queaity senelWe eraas�1►sey ere 9udsequ�y .
. dlsoo�ered. This dodrnat�t wifl serve ae your Savice Provider tetter aw�equl,red by Resotubon end Order Q7-20,3�tar+ •
3,p2-1. qIl�Qlfited Permlf$and approvals m�ha ol�taGteid and a�mpletod taider appiicab�e lot�f;s�erte,and�fede�el I�w•
❑ 711ht�rvla ProvldK LelMr la nOt vpl�t ynl�ea•_�„c�N&opprau�d S�ca pl�(s�e.��t�acn.d. .
❑ 7ha P�vposed adfvliy does not meet tite deA�kion of devebopmettt or the lot weec p18�ted Mer 919I�ORB 92.Q40(Z�. NO SlTE
• • /193ESSMEp1'�Ot{ RVICE PROVlOER LET7ER I$REQtJIRED. . , , •
�:w�d By� _,��/��!'�—� ' a�e: 9' ��--
s9v0 SW H�s1nro m�wvay-}�+o,Onqon 97t?x • . , f�l( , .
vnons:(ao818e1+�o•F.�(eoa�cw�o• .
�a:.txuY6� � , , -
• � ,
C.lean�'Vatcr� Sen-iccs
Ilnr cunuu�nn.ni �.� �Ir.�r. CWSf11YNumbOr
Sensitive Area Pre-Screening
Site Assessment
Jurisaiction:
Property Information: (exampre fS234A80�;D0) Owner Information:
Taxlot Ip(s):
25102CB0100 ruame: Tigard Tualatin S�hool pistrict
25102C608700 Cvmpanv:
Address: 6960 SW Sandbur Street
sica Address� 12850 SW Grant 5treet Ti gard, OR 97223
PnoneiFaX: 503-431-4007 � 503-431-4078
Nearest Cross Street: Wdl nut Street E-mail:
Development Activity: Check all that apply Applicant Information:
Addition to Single Family Residence (rooms, deck, garage) I] Name:
Lot line Adjustment ❑ Minor l.and Partition � compa►,y: Broadway Rose Theatre COmpany
Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium ❑ qddress: PO Box 231004
Residentia�Subdivision ❑ Gommer�ial Subdivision p Tiqard, OR g�281
Sin9�e Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Gommercial � phone�Fax: 503-603-9862 / 503-610-8512
Other E-mail�
Will the project involve any off-site work: YES ❑ NO� Unknown � Location and descrlptlon of off-slte work:
Addltional comments or information that may be needed to understand your p�oject:
Thls applicatlon does NOT replaca tne naed for Grad[ng and Erosion Control Permlta,Connection Permlts,Bullding Parmits.Site Development
Permits,DEQ 1200-C PArmit or other permits as issued by the Departmant of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Depertment of
the Army COE. All required permltg and approval5 muSt be obtained and completed unde�appllcable loeal,state,snd federsl Iaw.
6y 9igning thia form,che Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representsuve,acknowledges ano agrees Ihat employees o�Clean Water ServiCCS navG aulhonry
l0 enlel thC pfOjeCt 3itE 8i ell feeSOn2bl9 timC3 fOr�he purpoSE of inSpeCting DroJeCt Site ConCitions and gethermq Informauon rolateG ro tne pro�act site i cert;fy
tna[i am tam�llar with the Info�mat;on confainea In this document,and ro Ne best o}my knowledge and beliel.tnis information is true.complete and accura�e.
PrintlType Name � X Print/Type Title: S�n���H1
Signature: Dace� �
FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY
❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT
PRIbR YO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIOER LETTER. If Sensitive AreaS exist on the 5ite or witnin 200 feet on
adjacent propeRies,a Natura�Resources Assessment Report may also be required.
� eased on review of the submitted materials and best available infonnation Sensit��e areas do not appear to exist on site or
within 200'of the site. This Sensitive Area Pne-5creening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and
protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered. This document will serve as your Service Provider
letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and app�ovals must be obtained and
completed under applicable local, State, and federal law.
� Based on review of the Submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project w�ll not significantly
impact the existing or potentially sensitiva area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Sit�Assassment
does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and proted additional water qualiry sensitive areas�f they are subsequently
discovered. This document will serve as your Service Provider ietter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section
3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and fede�al laW
� This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached.
❑ The proposed activiry does not meet the definition of de�eiopment or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.oao(2). tv0 SITE
ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER I.ETTER IS REQUIRED.
Reviewed By: Date'
2550 SW Hillsbwo Miyhway•Hillaboro,Oregon 91�23
Dhone: (509)681-5�00•Fax: (50])6Bt.ea39•W�W clennw�����•ices oru
Rw��W:M�Y�.2007
� ����� � ��� �s0Z1 . �'Ma�"�Z1�1 �I-Il ' � $�', ,� ;�'��; o ��
I��fi°� ���= ��'a,k � � � ! � .;��`PiJni 5`�� a �l
ti��a�r: �,.L_
�
O �
� O
� �
O �
W W e� t 6 r ¢
m .. '"" i .�
� � � �r�� Tl��� `�1 y..,i �� e+� .7�e r'�"`�',
Z m � ��� � � }' �w� t�� � �.
,� 5 . '
� O y �� � � � � � ¢ n � ,; µ ������
❑ � �� a��g��p � r �'S*�1 ���1 � �'' ,�
� � d�'�� �����a �' C .d�`s� '\,. .� � ��// /�
Z � �;�Ar� .f'g.. y = �I �. t.�-�.�
� s _ a�e a a s � 4 �' �'t�j .-. J I, �'_y° °...$ ..
s stla - .zx4 x' %
�
Z � � j
,j�,�� ��t��il �� #� E���i t l�I 1 �t�; � ' !� � �
� � �.s��a��Re�e;s,�i�i��l�� ��i��tl���ts�i,nl���t�l �,i��'l.t#S�t�����
� ;�, .��l�BL�:Cp�kC��if 4i�9� 4�'��454�� .�egiYR��il4E[I ����B...Ja..�.�,,..
�
O `' � � ,
� i {
°° ! i!�� f � ° �3 ��
��1 r� a ed � lll� ! � ��l � � �{� �� 6��
W ���t!���i���[it�tf�ii���,����i�����9���iai�g ��iiii�6lii�i���l�s�a9��iiii
� ;, a���E�aF@Q@ee���lec@@�� s .a�e�l�e�l���ia�1�aP „a:y9s��liR�$���ia�r�B�E�aY1�
�.
� ' � �
7' � �
. � � �
�.... R ". � '� � � �i�f ! � � F � j ItJ L � � � 1
� fi�������a1�t�i��it �aa�l1� ��i���l;;t�I�II���I��Ii�����l9�� 1���14 �#l�
,��
� _
� �, =:vY�����€s�s� o4��i #,it seS6 3��S9�s��y55: 33�lY����ii1�39lgE�i� .�:Yg@ ee�8
� 4" � j �j S�
� ' F + =�i -4 i f '� rf1j �#�6�__i!���g` ��� j i�` �
Q �"kRl�+ I . �g y[ {f ¢ jEgji { �t S}fp��yFji�e jp a�€j;f��4��g� y{e!nea�� �� H 1t�y �ti;1iij�y
i�S��i�7 ��I�B��i��i��Pi�l�E�1�1�1 �iii8i13LF�F��F�l��p���Fi7���111� [1t�ilL3�
� r�. '
c � eeao€��� .amSaa��d��6�e�EtEaE��$a�8 .a�@ee@�r�r!'��l���&�@�rEeeG�°e�Ef bSe��tltle�
� a
' ii
� p
Z ' �, I
� O � � M � � 1 �
' ,:.
a � � +
� w� � ._ __.� ,_ _ _. a�ii� �Ii �1 �,1 F �!1 �jit�t �� ° �a�� i t�� �
� i���i����6���f�II�I� 9�I�����1��� l�t1i�Il�ii��i��I1�I�Iit��E������ 4D��I��jt
Q � :s4�is���l64i'���:{��i1 6�o���i��i5i �as��c�eaea�ea8�8s$����Ba�edb�c€s a��c3�sa
�
� a -
Q � �',af,%,__ i �_ ..._ �--- -
� �- l�r�,,��I� �1��
� �
� � �$ �� ' $ �g � F� OCT 1 9 ?007
c� � � �s �
� � �� a� �� � �� � �� �� � aa � �
� � �� � �� �� �a ��"' �� � �� t,l�� [ �<W
� uS �$� ��� � ��� ��� � ��� f�!P,P9�lou.��nirGA��r,�; � ���
_ � �� _ � � " �� _R �N� ���_ . ... � �"�
� � �a� �� ��� �� � ��� �- _�� �a � ����� � ���
�"� � ,' , . �
QL
DESIGN GROUP 1NC,
� 96U SW Barbur BNd.
Suke 101
y PoNarM,OR 87219
�I 15ai1�s1879
�� �
�I so' ro' o so' � sn�utN' 1 i V.EO F�0l�
I ' i �� !_—'�—�rn�cr c�.� i �:`F��'yo'ti
scu e -zo' - ''
� /�r �
� r
-�NSUU mt��cs ro cr.s _ �� � saeo � �'" �,, �'
� PROIECl fMSiING CB -� NATpf +� � �'�'1.D�'
,/ � E]dSMIC �
�� � �v.��°.,
••I ��� \
— ` I%10 `
_ �_T \ .
� _ - fi IMV 8d0 i.Tl\ 91.80
_ �� �_ � . �-I97.t6
1' /' /� - 1 /
� I``¢/ / `r� . ' `I \ Iya ` �MSIALL B/piACS Z
� e, . . � � z � 9) / �
R� �
. pW ��'�
INSTAL(SIOEWA(X 9�10 11
�M1 �DE�-K TO EXISIAVG. MAItl1 EXlS --- --- LL
� /M�04 EMSIk1C SW� J
� �SIDEWA(X CRAOFS - ---
�-� � � 91� — �fXISIING iREf IO BE O
T_ � ,�����U a
4�� ���� ,�5 � '� W Z
� �� a �
,�� �, _ _ ,: �.,,� o 0
�� 9�b ,�. � U
(� - '� ,�.m ' � �
+ • / 19fl 97.50 � I ,yyAIFR WAI�ITY /� � O Z
� -a � OC1ElJnd� PYO� O
$/ � S�� 191J0 - LJ 1 � Q �
� ti'�4�� 'I \ :,P�9 sw %� �
I/ ° � a
•.� I �\ IX15,IREt-l0 ,9,.—�-- - q� O ,e� p
V �y
�PROIFC � � l.l..
�'� � ��j�' fF 198.50 _ rNSreu acnncs Q W
`�� � ' " - � O o
` ��:, �,�
., � ��� ,�. �,� _ � � z
� , . . � �� m a
�• � '` r��c rr � 1o¢usw fF l99.50 1- yQpp mo (�
r
� r9s.a ��!an. r .W � Z
i �vv n�'
I Ur � :,� � .m r _tt1. l � LL
, . .. �. 9 ��
. ., .. � , ,�.��� � _
� % i�. � C�
��`�� ,. : , •. � � �z.�� � � � -' �, � i i.ex �--
. ' / \�, �
..' . . . , '°° � �.e' --. ,R/--..s� "°° � \�� _ --
. . '' ❑ i isazo--�
cav 9e.w �0° �i rav. wre er
� � � � �
� � � � � � �—
-'- �� � ov� � rs. �� ��.
- I � � �
1 ,M I '� ,f� I
� / r � i i
' '� mS p �lf� . a\ � �
��' � 9A10
- - 4�� , �-�--
, �.� ,�� �
# 1� � I —
vao,ECr
�rt s0000z
. � i wr: mn+mo�
jx 1 Sr� N11101M1
� �—�I o�s.. m
�
� � I\�� , �'. � �� �1�. . '�`� . . � . o.io+a.r
ci.meer m
C � • �
� L
DESIGN GROUP[NC.
� i'i
� 9065 SW BxDir BNd.
Suib 101
PortleM.OR 87218
CATCH BASIN Pi,�H /� ���� (so3)1251878
- - %'� Q p.�GE55
-� G �G s`�y4oeNorf
. ,�
� � �IIIfl � ��O�IF'� Length=50 Feet Min. �` �'��
➢ _. '°
_ O �SQ o�
_._ . .. _ SIDE /�/ �� / c�r n.9,�.`'
AREA URAIN DITCH INLET ��;_�
Radius=25'Min.
L
_ - � 6n_4„��S�g / .im�,�g5
Subgrade Reinforcement Qq�O�
� � � Geotextiic Required �Pth 81nc6es Min. `��S�P
,nrcErcoves i' I i i 'I Q1G P
�/BACKOF'N8a
� ..�� FACEOFCUAB
�-- - _ —;�' �'��" '20'MIN.FOR SiNGLE FAM➢.Y AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL �
�� J
� PLAN --��--� �}I �
� FR� \�\ // O �
�Ewe rou m ppe exiei V 'i � � •J
bclwem W¢md IR I Q �
���� —_ , � CONSTRUCTION _FNTRANCE DETAIL
N rs Q � H
eaorrr � Q O
�na�.�n.���n Q U'
, c�i�nv orr O ~ U
Z
�BIOBAG DETAIL � �
�+� vrs [� �
0
�
EROSION CONTROL NOTES W
i. owex cw otsw�rcn veasev swote ee'ae�ovs�tc rcYe rROr-n msuuw nav nnn wm�rcwwec a�.�u cno.var�wu srcv�rtrir carma _ I _�_
YEASURES W ACGP40ANCE NIM LOLAL.SIA][AMD FEDERAL RECUf.111(AVS L
2 ME uMiFMENt Ilpv Of M!Y ESG PtANS Alp CpySiRIKlNAV.WMIJENANC[REPLACQYENJ,AAD UPtlfAdNC L1�]il[5[[5C fACA1l1ES IS �
Ol '
fM RESPp19BHln'fX IK COHIR�C�d!UNitt AU.CLWSRNCIIM lS C01lP[FIED AMO APPROIED BY iME LOCN.i1M'ISfMCTKN.AAb I n! �4�
KQTA1lQV/1ANp5G1PM'C IS ES�Ad/AKO. RIf OEIELQ°ER 9iA11�/lE�.'W9bCC fUP YAMIEMAMQ M-JER iNE PRO.ELT 5 APPRbK➢IM�L ME
L015 ARE SQO - I �V.
i
1 11E 6i01MOME5(X iFl£tl£ARMCWIS Siq11II PY iM5 PIAN SNAfl BE QLARLY NANNm N/IX[F1E10/1UCM 10 ttW51R1/CIlCW. OLNMG Mf -` -------- � ' L N
CPYSiRI/CPW i`ERIOC NO p5/tRB.wCF bC1LW0 IK f1EA/eNG uvls 9iALL 61C PEFYIIED. iHE YAAISM.S SNALL BE YA.NIAMm Hr lHE .. I ..��.I �� � �j�-
�wvuc,wr/cavm�cma mr nr oue�nav a�ccwswuc�av. �t���3� � l� I I 1-
a ]hF ESL FAQJ1kS 9IOMM GW INS PlAN YUSt 0.�CQ`ISiRfICJEO N/GYM/ANCPO4 MIX All CtFwRwG�MO OPAOCIC ACANAES ANO/N A/CH A
.��sr.'�umTOUroxrsur�m�r�uulrwr ua srv�T i.�ocrr w�rw ars r�oi en�rw rrr av,�w�ce srsmv.ao�owurx ar�rourr�rwue¢a FRONT VIEW SIDE V1EW "EV. er
S ]K ESC FAWT.ES 9ION1/CW i1M5 PIAN AI�MMLW 1Kp.MlOLlI15 RYP AM11CiATEO 91E CpQ'MAVS qAiMG LYMSIRUCMW PERKYI. � `
ifESE£SC FAd!/]F5 SNAfL ff LIN]l.IOFD AS KFA`D fLF M[NRCiED 51DPY C1ENI5 AIU TO fNA.M£INAI SiD�[N/AMD YL�\KifT(AOEN I I
MAiER pQE3 N01{[A1E]NE 91E
^ 6. ME ESC FAbU7KS ylA(L�pf$VECiFD OAttI'BY iNE AAPVCANT/Q]ViRAC1df ANp YAMiNNEO AS hC[ISSIRY r0 FNSVIPE IIC!?CpJIW/HD I I
IUNC]IQVMC.
I I
l. AI NO]lIIE SM4L SE➢MKNT BE ALL�MED 1D ALYfMI!/LAiE YplE iFIfN I/J JNE BARFIER I�Mali ALL G1Ol BA91I5 AND LQVI£YANCE LWES
4IALL 9E QEANEO iWOP l0 PAM/C ihC qEAIN.'C pCRAMWS AiNl NOT fLU94 SEDYk'Hl-1,Ipp!IYAi[p WR!!iE DOMNSIp[AN SYSIiY ANGLE BOTH ENDSOF S8DUIENT PENCE I I
- G SiAdVIID(RA1EL EN1RNKi5 9U4�NSTAIIID A(1NF�ONWII/C Cl�CrifSTRUCiNYI MO YANTNLD fDP IICWRATd[1�ME RfQECT. j 70ASSURPSOp.ISTRAPP6D. �, I I
'" . MplWVK 1�15(.1�5 MAY ff REP'rPED ID AV9RE TNA�NL PAIfD ARfAS ARE ItEPT f1EN/ft?P ihE OGPATCM C1�iNC GFQELT. � .
/
9. 51ON PPAA'NME7S BA.9MS Nq AR[A MANS 9iN1 9E PROJECI[0 WR PA�EWT/7 S1.RFAC£5 AIPE CTAY^!£lID MM7/CiP 1£¢'/AIKW 6 f1._ �V
rrc-csr�sNm. --- --
I � � I.BU�RY BOTIOM OF FIL7ER FABRIC 6'MW. �'��
10. PAIE1CMi AIRFAQ$ANp�{(�fAilpV ARf lU BE PLAC£D AS RAApLY AS POS�E. NUMBER SOD002
,�. ���r�«+�o�o u,��,�nm���+��,�rr�,�„�. r a°'r`iRrosLOC`-rsB�� TOP VIEW z.i�r rm�'".Pv�e�oa srF�.e'R i ce�ros�rs.
�rID�77wcx 7.smc.7�v wors ro efl tHSi�l�.En o.e wnu�mr
IT. F IIrtRE AAE£]1VYD.4R.S OP SQS NOT iL(!Y ESTAft/9[D fRfY OL1[tlUP�11Rd/LYf AP/R J0. ilE IE�I!'A(/[iF EF09CM PIfE1ENIqV UPFIO.L SI�E OF S[AP& To� NMIpN1
IFAAMES MMl�N 6FEC1 scr neavav rwcwvnnv.wo.�o+r awma a.v+r+s uro nesd wnva(auPme�l rav xcauraio+rs 1.OOMPACC NATIVE PQ11N ALI.ARPa$OP
rJ. RIE f1E1EILWE/t SNACt REYk7�ED ESY MEAAME3 MIEM lEfL1A1Nri IS fLl!!Y ESTA6II/41ED. FILiER FABR7C IAENCFI.
Oiwn81' P1�
���
Crd�Ol�: dD
� SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL C � .2
�11 Nrs
;.� . � �
�� � iac�2 nr�o Paorrcr
I � E"5""�a°�a'"'""«""o DESIGN GRWP]NC.
p191E PPANAff SYS/EV
� � I
�l_ � � ���r' 9W55W BrCvBNd.
���„�,i � , � w�mr�vrrrx 5 suns tol
�, , � PoNrid.OR9721G
� (503)2261879
1 -- � 1 �
1 ,�!, �3.1 '�
c,T
I !�' � r�o�"`ri��r-r�n�,ra+. � S``aEO eeo��1�
S (rnn��a nw/� ! u.�rw rnsn+c sccrxw.uo ouacs ,,�,��c��•���i�
�� sut cr rnsn+c) _ � .. � �
X ��.ao ts r w ( nsr ce
/ �J � __ _ - � �o er exro�cn _�
� � .. m
i ra�ae v�Rwccnu.- o,'Py�.o'P F
� ��. ° �� � � ro ec r�eorrcicn. - .. - eor�rou�oo cw vcw� ��
�I B � cau�c uro vaol�cr cvsrinc rnrtrnavs :
� i ro c�rg�.e.�sms
cs.r
- \ _
, WA TER DETAIL � °�' ° ���`
r., 1^- ��• �o ' j . \ � '� � ` -- - ---�-- �sruianeecurs
� � e � . ` ! -- '�.e--
/ _ c�i
(• _ L/ j --_ - .._ �� . r-- �1 (l cnsr eo � Z
� ,.��,�,. g
�` rI-,r __� �0: (X-..� _ � TD BE PR01FClE KWI 191.
GLMLGTTD '� O,q�H _ %JOlF
rNG s W -v �- io•o.ws1 - Q.
!9].T2 S�O.pW G 0�' �l. .
•YA/Y 1�.Tl£X C �N4,�.'1(; . Wrn 1 �
`\\ N'18.9T'� IE 1 v � E+5�� . 41.H(f "• f
tl-
� �9� I Q Z
�,. ,�,��,. � � a w
�. , , / � . � o �
���� ��� � �,
i r' � ��
� �i \ �\.\ C} s 5aaio��nv.w.ri - - �°5°'au.w - -- a � �
\ �\ . . \�., � EXI51 fB � � -- -- � � O
�.
/� � . � � FlEtnioc�� - �'� � -- - - - i-r - wee�o � � �
/ '
� ,wo Prso�cr v � � � - - - Q H- d
i ca+Hecn"on�s�r"oFR � � � s•�o � � °' � i - - - �
�•� exrsnHC eu2aNC ��' yz � i i _ awac niuc. ,rrucruRr �
� �, � � � caur�acs m �
.. • . . , ��. � /--. � .. � j�� e I 9r.n u ro•o.ws� J
� ", . . , .' . �. \ . . ;' � (7�� � i . - ._ s-aow �
.. 1 6�C0
/£196 1? �
/
3ttF
n tt
. . .._-.._ . _
� / / ¢a a� C9 RIN 1.4fl00
. I KW 19/.�
I \
�
1� I I I T
� I � ca r \
iE rvs2a
0
[g p(y(9a.pp Z 9593 LF t0'D.)OJ1
�•'� ;p/T f9S50 e S�ooOI nEV' Bv
�,�•' .00(f 6"OJOJI CS1 � �
S�OOIO MM' �
�_. le I I I
• II 1 I I
, . .. M ! I I
. ,, . • i ,
. _ ' ❑ � A 10' �J' 0 20'
--- I 1 �� �i - � �
��,� � � . I . ' . . SC�(E -10' I __ I I
PfiWECf
� NULlER 500002
or o�m�m
loYt NB1101N1
hrnB�- PA
��
C�+d+C W O�D
C2. 1
-- - --
nr��s„co canoc - sryvunaa c�sr�20� � .�r..n ""' � , �--
` FRAAIE R COL£R �1 yM1�
I
�, � ����—�z � � � DESIGN GROUP[NC.
6"MW. 6'MM. �
'0 9045 SW Berbur BNd.
Sulle 101
PMlend,OR 97219
cayv�cren rxt —y -1 (50312ZS1879
IS'B£NO I. -C SY Yd �y��O • •�
er
„n.a,,V,o, � ��, �o»:,' sECnoN a-n
= j'-o'�v�oor ena�nu PLAN vIEW �� �`EOS.4 P�OFff�n
- vos sa �:,y'::
a
3 7 � '��' �.�6>.. c'°r i.o x>,€'
- •I o�'-_ -_ PA°E AS SHOMI! r�at ��_ -, �
�:_ - Q4 PLAM �--�-^�
f
. FLOW-THRU � .
x
� 14bIA.X 8�CCYK CIXLAR
�a.un coivr ro � -- j
lXA9ED GR.VdF -� �57ANDM0 CASi R[W
FAAVF Ald LVKR � ��lt - �
FRONT �IEW ve7esr[cmc Hcw s�oMwo `�'y�
�OUTIER AT CUFB MIET ' �
- +6," &
6"YW.� -6''VIN. .�srra � - �1�i �'i�!� �i Ii
*� �ProE 9ZE AS �iH��iu�f�a o�r snExcix a�ma�F S _
S40MN ON PUN n mr�rz .a� F.� ry __1MW -_ . _ 'w�.
NY0�1 Ni svaRU 111/M�F �py� -' -inm__ _i YMM111�
C[YP.M�ED ALL - .-�I m gl rRSr s4s�Ymf�clm e�L w�p4.�
15'BENC� i� • f.K��u SmiKn.R OX rMY R f 6 Y'W C
�I� �
�,cerr,ww� ` % j1 INLET (n (n
tE y ,o
�� � 'cxu`s n°�ac"eeEOOmu CATCH BASIN (CG-30`/ ����'� Q J
���d ��yl __I ORANING NO.2>0 �aMY➢03-0J ' � � Q
` i �"°„d�,a;,��,;^E� e CATCN 8AS1N DETAIL - � WAIER QUALITY/DETEN�ION FACIU7Y �
II °°�I�I�I� cai c�.� a Q Q
�+ JIF -0 �eO� °��ii�iTl-'11=
� �
,I ai�= �i 'I- J � U'
END-OF-L/NE _ ' � � F- ,_!
o —e'-a'we—{ O f,_,
� _..._. 5'-6" I �
4D(W.LLM N
eCLEANOUT DETAIL " `�`� "`"'"" � _,. m
��., § ..
� a q �� � .f0'MIN sF.NV'(-.0 LINE OEPiH �2'.�p'rl]'XOTOC�ST
K � �
� MEIER BOX,W/5'%]'C�ST
9.0' iRON pE�D ll�OR EWAL
"�naaKiH��.cc �� �� �� ��� � SIDEWALK ADJACF:NT TO CURB
3 � `�
5'-6' S'-0' B-0'PUE�
�.5' ML CURB� ^ � � �I �
� (iYP.) CUp9'Wi � ; ` R�� :�.
( J0�MIN SERVICE lME DFPTH �
�' -�° �§�
/ \ i2-.20�.�2-R�.00.51
}II 4EiER BOX.W/5'+T C�Si �'� n
9.0'-O.C. 9.0'-O.C. I' � IRON NEAD L10 OR EOUAL �
- (rn,) �rrv,� -� a,�a„� �� SIDEWALK WI7H PLANTER STRIP AT CURB
r � �
CURB-CUT LOCATIONS � �Sr�� I I
� � � �
9.D'-0.G 0.0'- .C. I I
�� e-��� SEE OLUMBINC
1.SUAYFYOR TO INSTML TEMPOftARY CODE FIXt DEPRI I
� n�wrt�rc�n w�m MUB AN�d1M0 STIJ(E 011 OF COYER i
WAROSTPkE T l0�11NE FOR
YEIFR INSTMLAMM. ��
].fN0 lYPES Of YE1ER BO%COKRS
-MT1 TWp1 FEM
� noiE: -v�n�ar rauai aFwo ROGk o ANCLE BALL NEtER VK�.E PROJECT
0.5� 10' 0.5' 1. S1Rf1QNG Of P�VEp IAEAS 9VALL COMPLY M11H SiREET p1T STANOMD�R�M1NG. (���T WAIEIi DINSIq1 itlt ME MUELLFR 82475! N� ��
3. AW1S TO BE T�pt N!D SNI�E�. J.CEN�ERE�YE�ER 80%TO 8E Ofi`SET 5/B�M 3/4'Y 1'OR EIXUL O�Y� Dnl1qW1
J. SAI�GIT 91A11 BE I�IX COAIED WTM BIIUYINUS A�NALT EMUL9pl. 1'FRpI RtOPERTY 11NE. 1'iY9['K�$UfT CMPEA
CURB-CUT ISOM£1RIC ne�r+c-sruaFn g°„ NTD
r ��1 //�� oi..�M vn
I�� �^ro.�sr"e^ � TRENCH �� � 3/4" R 1� n.c .w ��K
CURB-CUT DIMENSIONS �:y¢� BACNPILL �80 � ��.,"F WAiER SERVICE SLO ���� �
u nrro
� CURB CUT DETAIL G TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL � 3/4"' & 1" WATER SERVICE DETAIL C�� '�
��.�
. ,,, -�
, _ _ ' �
--__— `
�_ -� ,��� i=----�- �_ � ,
� � � �OpEP.°:1Ri;11
, �u2CF.�SEi,��G�c
���------- � + :R fo.�- �.�...,
. � ��' �;'�'R
:<oc.�
� . � � �o�.a.ooa�
�
� \ �
. . . � t� i __ . � •-7 . � �
. I f ..�� 1 .,. I � . . . !, .I� I �
I 1 �
!
,
�
�
�� � � � �
� �� �
c�
�
� ,g, �o�., \ .:,.�.°�.—'��-�� Q
� �� � � �
- � ; Q
; I � �
:; �� W
,_
, ,
� ��y_�� �. _
_ -- - ,\ � - � -- .....�.
,, :� �_,_ �� � �� I�
, , �'
� � � , � � ,
\.
� � �' � , �� � -
. � '� I i .
1 �� ° I ,'�� I ; !���- _� _�i
`��. � �.�,
— .,�."�' — { i ,`F� — j
0 - .o� �� � —
� J
_, i � � �a.r.e..
�
- O �_ � �
��
�.,�
�,,,,�
�,, � " �.�,
. 0 �s
O �_ --- — `��°�i'�
NORTM ��
, � �lp
� ROW DEDICATION PLAN OI�Y �?ar�
A1.00
�� �,
_ � � �
:� �; �
� ;
. � ���
.� �' - � ,-� �
�-_ � ,
�-_ ,��
� � �
�
� � /' ��
�
i O
1 ,,11 . � � �1
� ,1�,1
11
11�
� -' --_- '' ^ � 1' __
__�� � _ _ � _
� �-- --�'_�___�___ ��{�/%��I ,'� 1
� =1 �
� �l
�- � ' _ �NRMh�•� ���� �
�``�
-`" � . '-- �' I
�--'---------�� � ��� -'_-_�_ ��` I
i 1'�
I �i
¢ � � 1� t� 11
i I -----' �',�� -
�Yr.
b �
p\�f
�
I 1
i �Y��
5
���� � _
I ��'� , '__'_'_
; C ;;,;��
�;!�'� " -- ::�=--"
iii� --'" �- �'l
� �I iii� ---"" i 1
i t i `_______ Q
0
_'"Y �
�/��� � 4 � ' -'_'__'----'_'_!1i
%i
�
i n � i
i i
ii
i
�
�
I y � . Plfl' ��� � II � � _��---___-_-�
� � �j I
�______�______ JL__I}_
. . �h___'____________________________ _______c=____ ____' _�-
2
Q �
I ib
a
e
�'�'��'Q'�i���'�'��'��'���'����p�0a��� f�j `�
a; , g°. �4. °€V ". i� � �� 9l � i � � � 1 ! � ! 9��'� 1 ! 3 I � 3 � ��� l79E � ���.+��w/�'�'�
1 7E�" $ ts f 1 � d � �
���'������g�������€��°���s�`�3�°'������`����3�� o �°��� � 1 � � � $ i � �� �( � � � ! � [1 ��� ����.�' � � y
�°s a � ;� F� aS i� ���'� E� �;a�� 3 �s��� ,�o'i � § � { t �j J � § ��` � S 3 � � � �e- �� i ( � i S � � �j i �
�`i� a�o�as°��w��������4 � ����' ��: ����� �� ���dw : � � � � � � a ��� � ; i � � ��� s� � � � � � �i 1 � � � 4
�ib '�@ �"� &�e p ���r' �� � ! ��� � .�S� � i � ay a a
� � 1��� @ � �y��7��c� a i5�7� �a 3, 1 � s � p � 3 i � f ei� s i e �ia 9'1 "9 � ep � o �
���g i� � � ��#�"g ��i�op�� li";�a �p o����a �� �y°�� � a @� � i � ae � � '� E 1 �F .� F � ip � � � � �
.�a �� �i�9 ������Y����a���� co`f� �1 E����� �t �s i � 6 4 ����� �° � ; 1 � d a � �
I��� = b� � €�� � ��� ���i ���a �£ � ��� .� � ° �� � � � " � � � �
� D .�ti��-.s�J'f � �i� ��"�'�IlII,,� °-�— -- -- — - -- —�3� 6�����
�� s � �s� ��� ��, ,a, � , T�� ���,d►�w, y �os� �, � �,�� mD
;—,��0• ,• �'—� ' -��- ��,�x�__ .: _
'�� '' I _ _ — _
� . _ � '1
!
Q � • 1�
0� ; / �f O
� �� � �
� �
� �� ,' � �
�; � � 1
�� � � 1
i I O �
?> �
�
� �,; o�
�� � ��
;,�
�(- � j '. O
; � 1
�O—' _'<O '; �
� � � �
� � '��
� � --- _--_ � .
i�a � ,� .r � �} � _ —,��� � �
, �i O��_ �i � �A'\ \\ I
1 � ,'� . �\\ �
5.� 1. O
� '� ,��,j ) II•� � � 1
� :i ��t � � Y� �
'l * 1 .
+ � t_' !.
,'.�,'t ' _ 1 . 1 .
t �.� i
l I ()
' g 1 � ,
, �, ,
� � � o ��� � �
, ------------ . . ,
�
; � .
, . �-,,�
� �
� , �.
�`L - � .: ,
, ; �° ��� ' � , �; '
<<u �
,:�. --- -
� . �
;.� , _ .
,
,..
.
y; o � �a
,� �,.:
,. u . � J�
i i
.
'1 i U II� I ) �.
� �1 f- } Q Q � t � .'��'
�'.��� M. I J" � � . �.
� S' ., h 1..r y .
/� .I• { R .�.t� '
� . v�
O� ���� ��� � P t O � i ` 1���� ���.
+ Y��Q.
:e � Q ' � 7{ r � � i J �,
:. { � �. 1 � �� .
�Y ' .
,.,� ', 5 1 �! � � j . !. 'y �3 l 1'
.. .
� � , � � _, 'r 4 .�.
� {� !.l �` 1 Y f� � tI p � � I
�, � t .�M �.i � y,} � � " 5 1 ' O .^
r t � .t � 'ly
,h �.) . , f . ��, �"�`� .� ��,�; • �i�` �4 �A r ..��
-� :� � ' ' . �, '
.,Fr il �' / J 4'. ' ii,� '! �J�� , =r 1 r�Y:}� � �
t � :t t .� �:. ... _
� 1 I '.l•� � ,�! A 1 � ' j ��� � '�� 4 1
O � ��E; ��� $.��.
� *,� � , (`� f �1 �, 1� ,+ .
I f �t� O +�Y � ��! � ,�b
� o � �� ►d°�4�
�o ? ��°s
� � "' __ —_---_ _ � �____ ���e
. _ i I.� � c ��JJ� ..
�
� . ..___._ _ —_ �; _� ;c��- �: �
�'�'��'�����p���`���� '���������� �7
���4��cv-;�j�i�� �mF�i�������j��"��"�s==;y��s�€��"s�#�j����f� Rg���f�� � � � 3 � � B � ������ � i � � � � � �� ��Hife `����o 0����`+;:�C-?
;��i�i���� ;a��;� �, ������� ��9{������ ��g�,�I��� ;�,���� ������a i � � E � ����� s �! ;� �a�f�� � 1� � � �-�' � 9 ! � �
�a����g� �� ' ���s�I�Q a�d��$ ��4p �� � ' 6� a€�d ! p����� � ■ e � g � P� � 1 �� "� � � � �
�is �'.�.a a�� E � €'��3� 3 ��� ! a� �� i3 A � 6 3 i � �§ ai � 1 a �# �! q �1 1 � � � f
6- � 4 € ��g�= f� ra��� � A i. � � o � � E N" E a 4`+ � � ' o a
;9��� ����� f�c � ��F 3 4�e��� � �1 e a fl y � 3 1 i � ! i � � i �
��� °a i�������� + �i" �����������°���� €���s �' `@ 3�� �! � '� � � � ; � � d��,� � � � � � ' � � ` � g � E
� � � � a - E a � � i
9 �` �
�a p �� � �� �� ��� ��� �� �+ �� �I�� ;; �� ��� �' t � � �
�o o• �'� i��� � �ji� _ _ E��:
f ...�
� N � � �: �� � � � , TN� ��o�►�w� � �osE �;�� �°� � __� �
I I� � ��
u °�► �,1 I i �i�g�. ; — I
� �g�i� R' _ _ � ," ''.l i 0��`�—ct ro,;I I
� �� �� �sa� , �Ma�O�� �Ni ' � i'� y �� I�� � � �
��i� ����� �,'�iJ� d � ��, ��i,� �e���l�- ��
s '� e 2 � a y =
� � � ° � � � � � ; � �
� g �tl9���� g �� vy o � � � � � �� � 9 � 3 � � �
� �� ¢ � �� �' � c c r r r c B R � �
e���� g �g �� � � � � � � � � � e d e d a � ��d� � � �
�;�¢�� �����' ������� � � � � � � # r � � � � � , � �� R� � � a ��_
a � � : � �� � � F � � �� � � � � � � ���r � � � �
g�������3��� ��������� � � � 9 9 � � � 9 � � � ��������� � � - � � � �
� � � � � l � � � � � � � � � � � � � ���������rlr � � � ���l�� � � � � ���
�� IIIV o000000000000000000000000�00000000000
G U m <
� u —w �
�W
i � � � � �� �Q �F � ���
, a
N
��� M� � �a `—�
� � �`' �� � � �
i � � — � ��
� � � �� o - �� _ �
sas. � � g � � �
i' �'�1'C ;_ - �
,',��
� LM 0 � s �
�' ���
'�� �
, ¢,;
C-� `��I � �8 '�`' " . ,
. - ��� '�:�
,� � ��� , .,
�'
ff� ° `
`'' o F=
� a ��
�i,��o
�� -�-
�, �
� � �
� �, o
�
� o , �
� � ' � �
� Q ;
_ � � �4
,�_
�. }
i
�
31 ;.�'-_� _ _
� ' "
���-
__�'
�1
I ^
1 / \
♦ _ -_ 1-
�- �a.�.�_ b d 11 �
`� 1
I; � /. _ 1
� � i I � � �
0� r ' `r
q I
i ,'�` - " � '
„_ �
� r `,
� ��
_ ''�
I �� '
I � �
4`__ �� �
I £ N
I
�___ � I
�1. ' � -� -°�
� � ` i ' �
..-1 —.,, �
`s� m n v
000000000000000000000000000000000000 � �
R ! � � � 9 ; ? �;��t = � � 4 4 9 i �S • -
� � ; � � �e� G � ��� �������� � � � � � � � � � � � € � � 6 � F � ���'�� ��` �� e ���
a � �!a � � � � i �A� � � � 4 a � 1 � � � � ����3�a� �������n`,4
� � � � � �7���� � � � � � � ��� � � € � � � m � m � � � � � ��� ���� � �����;���
� � � � � m �€�� � ; � � � �� � � � � � � F � � � � � ������ �� �����Q�
� � � � � �� � � � � � � � � ��� ��� �° � ��Y
� � � � � � �
I�N ��' �'��II . , � pl�lr� �l��l- �— _ _ — � � -- ����• 38���"�
� D �� � �� � � TNE I31?o,��w I2osE � � —��
� III ; �
������ ��`� �I � L�L�'L ___ - - � � � I
' — — _ _ --------- d '���� �
///��� �� -
� � 3 4 � ..�.� .
'-..a�r..oM".w...anna
� 1�1'IqIS
I
�— �, � �m�worwoorwror�..s
rlf i I�,T, � ;: .�«: I�, i. il" T — :: .�..��.,.�
-- � i I����� I'" — O� eooeasrnor
C)Qw� ��'� � �� �} I � � i' - �,� p��,..�ro....� �na�r�cre�o
.�— , — ";i II�� ipu II�. p.,�.�.�� __..�.
- -- - - ,__ � — _ �� i i �� I p�„�....��.K� i�"'�=
�__ �� ��� I'
--- - i �
- �_ - . � lii �!' ' �i �...a,���.
i
� �
O�
� . I
I , _�i. .� �i
��i
_—
, i I i
��
I _.__ - =
`�-- _��,��� �- ����� �� J - 1 I' I �I� I p�,.A,�,,�.�.,�.,,,., ,.a...�,�.
. .— ._......_ . . ._— __ . 4 __— __
!Y'.�— _ .. _ --_— .-. . . ___ . .. . �'9k�►
-- -_'-- �.,.rRia.rmr,Km.b .....�.
— — ��- - ----- �- — - . . . ....aw�
-------- , .�
, �. .... ��' ��w�woa.. ..,.m...,w.,a
� �.,.nro.oro. Ir
l ` � ��}'��V/1T�� i �—
� ' �
�
� � � �� � � � �
.� .
� � O � I
r�— . . I. � ��
. _ .._
C? � , .� _ � i
° � ' 3
� ___ _ ._-- �. �
�
- _- - - � - �- � o
. �- _
-- � � _� �u � - =p = �� �� _: �
— _- � o �
�EAST HFVATION i �
r I
5 4 3 2 1 W
� � � � �
�- .� - �_ .� �� �'�
�: -- - --.. . - - —mi+ �
,.-- ' � ` �_�_7 .�ii 1 � J,i �61�{,i,i',lil
_ � _ _:_ ..._ - � ".M.�.".4
�
�- I � Q ',, _ . _- -... . _ __ J ! C\)_ II
i ,_ . —_. .._... - -- . .
� �� . . -_-,-- -- • - _
l�j�,! .
—__ _ i I - � _ _ ' -_ _ ��IJ� I�I I!'. _ lll -_ _-
�"� I -- — —�. _
I �
�90UTH�EVATION !°'� �
V ,�p
•. ' �P4t- 06HBO�
: E\ ^ C O �A�, �.."°�. --
/ � � `
Y � �
--.»
.�- _ _-_ � - � �
, _. �.
_--
_ — -
__.-r� c� �I - � r
__
� ,� - -- -
� � .� •-R.. �.-_ . - arrn.
. ;'., _'�,"1.."-�^^f' � i .�,:; i�l — -_-- aavenwe
�— . _ � . . ..— --___
_-�� � � t� o � _
=o - i � ' l,l ,�� I, il��I I" I�'� II � � I I��j��'�1 � —� �-= I.S�•��a�f
I ii �i �.
_ i I I —_ _ _ _,a�� ���
�J.—. _ _— ---.� I �f� ���
nwES-r aEVanoN I _�4 _
Y ro�.i•.m
A3.01
m�.
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION FOR SCHOOL 57REET
T-0'X(PROPERTY LENGTM ALONG SCMOOL STI3EET
3FIOWN IN HATCH
� �—___-
�a , _-_-_ _-� .�,f;���I�ED
� �, ��
° -- - - �� �P 2 7 2007
� '
.;I�Y OF TIGARD
E ISTINGSTREETTREES I � �'''-�n!niiAl^����rinl�FR�NG
1 -72'O.C..TYPICAL
r
w
�
m
�
s
U
y
�Q
�
- <p EXISTING STqEET TREES_�
.$ � 70'-1 Y O.C.,TYPICAL
� \
1
i '
� �
�
�
,_ _. _
_ ___
O-� _-----�----.�.- �� .. STING STREET TRFES
_.__--�- 1 2'O.C..TYPICAL',
. OQ \_ O O
J,
• �
EXISTIN�TREET TREES I I
10'-12'O.C..TVPICAL I
0 .
GRANTSTREET I
` �i
O O
O
�
� i
NORTH
/ � \��1VR�'RA�f'L/7��/Rf �
Q � �� mA�o � � m a � � xy x� ��
o �
z ` �� mmZ— � fD f � �
o D � a � cn m D� �' '� ' �' i � � ' � 1 •�
� � �
� � o � z� N � � �=;.��.: TN� ��o,��w,�y �os� � � � ��a��
g $ � � � m �� �� � � :�� .
. °
� V gq�
y ���1 'I TMEATR! COM�ANT � �3� � � I
� i i
CUP 3to -- eoo° A• GuP.2 Do7-0000a,
a
•
Cheryl Gaines
From: Kim McMillan
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:43 AM
To: Al Dickman; TimA @sdra.com
Cc: Maris Buxton; Cheryl Caines
Subject: Broadway Rose
I received new Storm calcs and signed off that condition.
Kim
Kim McMillan
Development Review Engineer
503-718-2642
Fax 503-624-0752
1
C� �'
11� Q l°_.
� �'
�
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
BROADWAY ROSE
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
D L
DESIGN GROUP INC.
D L
DESIGN GROUP INC.
Drainage Report
BROADWAY ROSE
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Prepared for:
Broadway Roses
12855 SW Grant
Tigard, OR 97223
Prepared By:
Khoi Le
DL Design Group Inc.
9045 SW Barbur Blvd.,Suite 101
Portland,Oregon 97219
0 PROT
1 N
Cs .�,`S�!/D
A) 19160 •P A
Azz
low' 4.0 OREGON
!y 15. '4 G
04IP)' 1. DP":*-,
EXPIRES 12-31-07
August 10,2007
Project No:SOD002
9045 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 101 • Portland, Oregon 97219 • Phone: 503.225.1679 • Fax: 503.246.2094
FINDINGS AND PROJECT STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 3
L PROJECT DESCRIPTION _ 4
Figure 1: Vicinity Map 4
H. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4
Figure 2: Pre Developed Basin Map 5
III. SOIL INFORMATION 6
Figure 3: Washington County Soil Map 6
IV. PROPOSED DRAINAGE 6
Figure 4: Post Developed Basin Map 7
V. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS 8
VL RUN-OFF SUPPPORT INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS 8
1. Impervious and Pervious Surface Areas 8
Table 1: Pervious and Impervious Area 8
2. Curve Numbers 8
Table 2: Curve Number 9
3. Time of Concentration 9
Table 3: Time of Concentration 9
4. Peak Discharge and Volume 9
Table 4: Peak Flow Rates 9
Table 6: Peak Volumes 9
VII. WATER QUALITY 9
Table 7: Water Quality Flow 10
Table 8: Water Quality FlowDepth 10
Table 9: 25 Year Storm Flow Depth 11
VIII. WATER QUANITY AND DETENTION 11
Table 10: Level Pool 11
Table 11: Stage Storage 12
Table 12: Stage Discharge 12
APPENDIX A 13
SOIL INFORMATION 13
Table 13: Soil Hydrologic Group 16
Table 14: Manning Numbers 17
Table 15: Curve Numbers 18
APPENDIX B 19
SUPPORT INFORMATION 19
AND CALCULATIONS 19
Table 16: 25-Year Storm Event Post Development Flow and Hydrograph 20
Table 17: 25-Year Storm Event Pre Development Flow and Hydrograph 21
Table 18: 2-Year Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration 22
Table 19: 10-Year Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration 23
Table 20: 25-Year Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration 23
2
FINDINGS AND PROJECT STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY
The developer proposes to construct a private storm system consist of an extended dry
pond to detain and treat the run-off generated from the development.
The extended dry pond shall have a bottom width of 4.00 feet with a permanent pool
depth of 0.4 feet. Side slope of the treatment area must be 3:1 (H:V). The pond depth
must include a foot of free board from the 25 year design water surface elevation.
In accordance with our calculations, the following are the parameters of the dry extended
pond and the flow control manhole.
Pond Parameters:
Length= 110 feet
Bottom width= 10 feet
Bottom Pond Elevation= 194.40
Side Slope: 3:1
Permanent pool depth= 0.4'
Water Quality Depth=0.11 feet
Water Quality Elevation= 194.51
25 Year Storm Event Flow Depth= 0.42 feet
25 Year Storm Event Elevation= 194.82.
Flow Control Inlet Parameters:
Orifice Diameter Orifice Elevation
(in) (ft)
2 Year Storm Event 0.75 194.40
10 Year Storm Event 4.00 195.40
25 Year Storm Event 4.00 195.90
3
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project is the remodeling of an existing school building into the Broadway Theater
on a 1.29 acre property located at 12855 SW Grant Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The
property can also be located by the Washington County Map under the following
information: T2S,R1 W,W.M. Quarter Section 02CB, Tax Lot#100. For exact
location, see vicinity map below.
The project will consist of remodeling the existing building, constructing additional
parking and providing new sidewalk as well as landscaping around the building and
parking area.
For storm drainage,the development proposes to construct a private storm system that
will consist of an extended dry pond to detain and treat the run-off before discharging
into the existing public storm system.
,--,-,---sr.' SW Me d wvSf
s' A/cy r' Cc,�! S*". '''
r
,4.� �! '''''e SVQrc�
N x- w, 'v4r
I.PROJECT SITE ce0 .�' t sj. s�
. r SW Etrai "' r'''G <1. s.,,
5..
cc i La Le'• �3Y 4l
n
Cb-
- so n' l Ct=-.if, „` st.,
�' • !, 41 A0^?, "' mot,
n
111 r^,
a as
A I r, 1�
sw „ _ y 3W 1�rirarg3f
7;7=
FaIrltdven St .i, 1 i
ft2 'µ
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
There is an existing school building and parking area currently resided onsite. The
parking is connected to the culdesac and accesses onto SW Grant Avenue. The
4
topography of the site is quite flat. As for therun-off situation,roof and parking lot run-
off currently are not detained and treated accordingly to the city requirements.
1
„ ,4° r I /
\ c `vW" fl ° ; 1 _- j - _ i P
05 1, � Y',,,,,,2-71--.
� / `' ''.. 47
t � :-:,.-•,..�� * -,---,a,k' ". . ... • - :-•:•—i.' '— :;.::;.,
/ .;#. j ,,,, ,.° h ms. ,c�• ,.�0
�4 1k rS \ .9G' S,
r
•
•6. /' /--�
c o 1,,
-'!0-4
„... ir- -`
► .a
1RU+ i 7 1.,
'`• 1 ?•% J �\
1 !G /
:
\\_.___,\\I /
‹; •��•O.. `. , :ice J //
4 ,,
.•;\ #� / 7- �/ ••••, \ / i
.------„
i,
/ I
i
Figure 2: Pre Developed Basin Map
5
III. SOIL INFORMATION
According to the Soil Survey of Washington County,the soil on this site belongs to two
different series: Cascade and Woodburn. The first soil type is the Cascade Silt Loam
(7C). The second soil type is the Woodburn Silt Loam(45C). The Hydorlogic Soil of
Group for both of these series is C. The runoff for this soil is described as being medium
and moderate for erosion hazard. For more descriptive information on the soil, see soil
information in Appendix A.
l
.... c
_ if T
aF
ffi j,4
/„/
„,-'
r
I 6.1 9"%,./ /,'" . - : ii
Figure 3: Washin'ton County Soil Map
IV. PROPOSED DRAINAGE
The proposed storm system is shown in Post Development Basin Map on the next page.
The development proposes to construct private storm system consist of 24" detention
pipe to detain the roof and parking run-offs as well as infiltration manhole to treat all the
run-offs before discharging to the main storm system on SW Grant Avenue.
6
„/,,,_„, r i,,,,,„\i„:„..„ 7 '
i 1----__________ 0> ./ 7--),5,,,,
/-/- -„......„...„..,-----? /
\--------- H \-4
(/\-: . \ S
--..'\---) ___/14 '‘`I\s M11-1 A
N
p
c\
1----)
1, :\--,5„ ir \ 1
■
\ \*"------„,_\,\-------\\”, till 7., :t
I ,.i a 'lc:/
\\,..,\ s \ , + i
b
, 0-. a i..1
N ft., ..,, , Elk
N) Cf'0 : ri. t..................
' . 411Allq 1,
y 4
„�/ III ''ti
IL F
71 1 ----- */ ,
-...„, /
c 2' sui *vailitrip ,ftwie *
/a \ i � „ !2. , ,74i1 , hfk / ,, / 7 fit, , _.(.'b.. i,
Figure 4: Post-Developed Basin Map
7
V. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
Hydrologic analyses for the site have been completed following the SCS, Type IA
Hydrograph method, with modeling by the WaterWorks computer program. This
program enables the user to develop runoff hydrographs and determine detention
requirements under a variety of stage-storage options. Analysis calculations, supporting
information, and computer output are contained in Appendix B.
Following are our calculation process:
• Determine the soil type and classification.
• Determine the Curve Numbers.
• Calculate Impervious and Pervious areas of the basin area.
• Determine flow length and run-off slope.
• Determine the Time of Concentrations.
• Calculate Peak Flow Rates and Volumes.
• Design Water Quality Facility
• Perform Downstream Analysis
• Determine whether or not Detention Facility is required.
VI. RUN-OFF SUPPPORT INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS
1. Impervious and Pervious Surface.Areas
The impervious and pervious surface areas of the pre-development conditions and post
development conditions are the actual areas taken from the site plan.
Description Pre Developed Site Post Developed Site
(acre) (acre)
Pervious Surface 1.29 0.13
Impervious Surface 0.00 1.16
Total Basin Area 1.29 1.29
Table l: Pervious and Impervious Area
2. Curve Numbers
We assume that the pervious area in both the pre-developed conditions and post
developed conditions to be pasture or meadow. The CN for pasture or meadow is 85 for
soil type C and CN = 98 for impervious area.
8
Pre Developed Site Post Developed Site
Description CN CN
Pervious Surface 85 85
Impervious Surface 98 98
Table 2: Curve Number
3. Time of Concentration
Time of concentration is the time for run-off to travel from the hydraulically most distant
point of the watershed to the point where the hydrograph is to be calculated.
Calculations and calculated time of concentrations are presented in Appendix C.
Description Pre Developed Post Developed
Site Site
TOC 2 Storm Event (min) 20.23 5.00
TOC 10 Storm Event (min) 17.20 5.00
TOC 25 Storm Event (min) 16.20 5.00
Table 3: Time of Concentration
4. Peak Discharge and Volume
Peak discharge rates for the prescribed rainfall events for pre-developed and post-
developed site conditions. The rainfall depths are 24-hour rainfall depths used for the
Washington County. Computer model output is contained in Appendix C.
Description Pre Developed Post Developed
Site Site
Q 2 Year Storm Event (cfs) 0.23 0.40
Q 10 Year Storm Event (cfs) 0.56 0.60
Q 25 Year Storm Event(cfs) 0.70 1.08 _
Table 4: Peak Flow Rates
Description Pre Developed Post Developed Volume
Site Site Difference
Q 2 Year Storm Event(cft) 5,321 9,814 4,493
Q 10 Year Storm Event (cft) 8,929 14,046 5,117
Q 25 Year Storm Event(cft) 10,719 16,062 5,343
Table 6: Peak Volumes
VII. WATER QUALITY
9
WATER QUALITY FLOW
Project No.: SOD002
Design By: KQL
SUMMARY:
Q (cfs) = 0.11 CWSWQflowrate
V(cf)= 1516 WQ Volume
A (ac) = 1.160 Effective impervious area only
where:
WQ Volume=0.36 (in)x Area (sf)/[12 (in/ft)]
CWS WQ flow rate=WQ Volume(cf)/ [14,400 sec]
or
CWS WQ flow rate = [0.36 (in)x Area (sf)/ [12 (in/ft)(4hr) (60min/hr) (60sec/min)]
Table 7: Water Oualitv Flow
WATER QUALITY SWALE - DESIGN
BROADWAY ROSE THEATER
Man-Made Channels
CIVIL TOOLS PRO
English Units
08-10-2007 13:42:56
Results
Flow Depth = 0.11 ft
Flowrate = 0.11 cfs
Bottom Width = 10.00 ft
Side Slope(H:V) = 4.0000 H:V
Channel Slope (V:H) = 0.0050 V:H
Manning's N = 0.240
Wetted Area = 1.11 sq ft
Wetted Perimeter = 10.88 ft
Velocity = 0.10 fps
Froude No. = 0.05
Flow Regime = Sub-Critical
Table 8: Water Quality FlowDepth
10
Required Length of Swale= 0.10 fps x 540 sec= 54 ft
Actual Length of Swale = 110 ft> 100 ft OK
25 YEAR STORM EVENT FLOW DEPTH
BROADWAY ROSE THEATER
Man-Made Channels
CIVIL TOOLS PRO
English Units
08-10-2007 14:18:56
Results
Flow Depth = 0.42 ft
Flowrate = 1.08 cfs
Bottom Width = 10.00 ft
Side Slope(H:V) = 4.0000 H:V
Channel Slope (V:H) = 0.0050 V:H
Manning's N = 0.240
Wetted Area = 4.85 sq ft
Wetted Perimeter = 13.43 ft
Velocity = 0.22 fps
Froude No. = 0.07
Flow Regime = Sub-Critical
Table 9: 25 Year Storm Flow Depth
VIII. WATER QUANITY AND DETENTION
LEVEL POLL SUMMARY
MATCH IN STO- DIS- PEAK OUT STO-
DESCRIPTION FLOW RAGE CHARGE STAGE FLOW RAGE
(cfs) (cfs) id id (ft) id (cfs) (cft)
2 YR STORM EVENT 0.30 0.67 PIPE ORIFICE 195.58 1 0.30 2951.08
10 YR STORM EVENT 0.56 0.95 PIPE ORIFICE 196.06 2 0.55 3575.57
25 YR STORM EVENT 0.70 1.08 PIPE ORIFICE 196.17 3 0.62 3842.44
Table 10: Level Pool
11
•
STAGE DISCHARGE
MULTIPLE ORIFICE
Outlet Elevation: 194.00
Elevation 1: 194.00 Orifice Diameter 1: 0.75 in
Elevation 2: 195.40 Orifice Diameter 2: 4.00 in
Elevation 3: 195.90 Orifice Diameter 3: 4.00 in
STAGE DISCHARGE STAGE DISCHARGE STAGE DISCHARGE STAGE DISCHARGE
(ft) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (ft) (cfs)
194.4 0 195 0.0118 195.6 0.2109 196.2 0.6466
194.5 0.0048 195.1 0.0128 195.7 0.2552 196.3 0.7076
194.6 0.0068 195.2 0.0137 195.8 0.2927 196.4 0.7628
194.7 0.0084 195.3 0.0145 195.9 0.3257
194.8 0.0097 195.4 0.0153 196 0.4929
194.9 0.0108 195.5 0.1533 196.1 0.5774
Table 11: Stage Storage
STAGE STORAGE STAGE STORAGE STAGE STORAGE STAGE STORAGE
(ft) (cf) Ac-ft (ft) (cf) Ac-ft (ft) (cf) Ac-ft (ft) (cf) Ac-ft
194.4 0 0 196.1 3669 0.0842 197.9 11290 0.2592 199.7 19520 0.4481
194.4 0 0 196.2 3923 0.0901 198 11747 0.2697 199.8 19977 0.4586
194.5 188.8 0.0043 196.3 4178 0.0959 198.1 12204 0.2802 199.9 20434 0.4691
194.6 377.6 0.0087 196.4 4432 0.1017 198.2 12662 0.2907 200 20891 0.4796
194.7 566.4 0.013 196.5 4889 0.1122 198.3 13119 0.3012 200.1 21348 0.4901
194.8 755.2 0.0173 196.6 5346 0.1227 198.4 13576 0.3117 200.2 21806 0.5006
194.9 944 0.0217 196.7 5804 0.1332 198.5 14033 0.3222 200.3 22263 0.5111
195 1133 0.026 196.8 6261 0.1437 198.6 14490 0.3327 200.4 22720 0.5216
195.1 1322 0.0303 196.9 6718 0.1542 198.7 14948 0.3431 200.5 23177 0.5321
195.2 1510 0.0347 197 7175 0.1647 198.8 15405 0.3536 200.6 23634 0.5426
195.3 1699 0.039 197.1 7632 0.1752 198.9 15862 0.3641 200.7 24092 0.5531
195.4 1888 0.0433 197.2 8090 0.1857 199 16319 0.3746 200.8 24549 0.5636
195.5 2142 0.0492 197.3 8547 0.1962 199.1 16776 0.3851 200.9 25006 0:5741
195.6 2397 0.055 197.4 9004 0.2067 199.2 17234 0.3956 201 25463 0.5846
195.7 2651 0.0609 197.5 9461 0.2172 199.3 17691 0.4061 201.1 25920 0.5951
195.8 2906 0.0667 197.6 9918 0.2277 199.4 18148 0.4166 201.2 26378 0.6055
195.9 3160 0.0725 197.7 10376 0.2382 199.5 18605 0.4271 201.3 26835 0.616
196 3414 0.0784 197.8 10833 0.2487 199.6 19062 0.4376 201.4 . 27292 0.6265
Table 12: Stage Discharge
The results also indicate that the post developed flow rates are controlled. They are either
matched or less than compared to the existing conditions flow rates.
12
APPENDIX A
SOIL INFORMATION
13
•
tic; many fine roots; m , fine, tubular It has a profile similar to the one described as representative
pores;medium acid(pH 5.6);clear, smooth of the series.
boundary.6 to 10 inches thick. Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Amity,
B1-15 to 23 inches, very dark grayish-brown (10YR Dayton,and Woodburn soils,which make up as much as 10
3/2) silt loam, grayish brown (I OYR 5/2) percent of this mapping unit
dry; moderate, medium, subangular blocky Runoff is medium,and the hazard of erosion is moderate.
structure;slightly hard,friable,slightly sticky Capability unit Ile-1;wildlife group 2.
and slightly plastic; many fine roots; many, 44D-Willamette silt loam,12 to 20 percent slopes.
medium, tubular pores; medium acid (pH This moderately steep soil is on side slopes of terrace
6.0) : clear, wavy boundary. 7 to 11 inches escarpments.
thick. Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Amity,
B21t-23 to 32 inches,dark-brown(10YR 3/3)silty clay Dayton,and Woodburn soils,which make up as much as 10
loam,brown(10YR 5/3)dry;moderate,fine percent of this mapping unit.
and very fine, subangular blocky structure; Runoff is medium,and the hazard of erosion is moderate.
slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky and Capability unit IIIe-1;wildlife group 2.
slightly plastic; common fine roots; many,
medium and fine, tubular pores; few, thin,
patchy clay films; medium acid (pH 6.0) ; Woodburn series♦-
clear,wavy boundary.0 to 13 inches thick. The Woodburn series consists of moderately well-drained
B22t-32 to 43 inches, brown (10YR 4/3) silty clay soils that formed in old alluvium on low, broad valley
loam, brown (IOYR 5/3) dry; weak, coarse, terraces. Slope is 0 to 20 percent. Elevation is 150 to 250
subangular blocky structure; slightly hard, feet. Where these soils are not cultivated, the vegetation is
friable, slightly sticky and plastic;many fine Douglas-fir,Oregon white oak,grasses,and shrubs. Average
roots; many, medium, tubular pores; many annual precipitation is 40 to 50 inches, average annual air
moderately'erat films thick pis;films my ores(pH f few temperature is 50°to 54°F,and the frost-free period is 165
gradual, wavy boundary. 0 to 16 inches to 210 days.
thick. In a representative profile the surface layer is very dark
C-43 to 60 inches, brown(10YR 4/3)silty clay loam, darkk--brown andildar grayish-brown s thick.It loam and silty clay
pale brown(10YR 6/3)dry;massive;slightly loam about 30 inches thick. The substratum is dark
hard, firm, slightly sticky and plastic; few grayish-brown silt loam about 19 inches thick.The profile is
fine roots; many, medium, tubular pores; medium acid throughout.
many moderately thick clay films in pores; Permeability is slow.Available water capacity is 11 to 13
slightly acid(pH 6.2). inches. Water-supplying capacity is 15 to 20 inches.
The A horizon ranges from very dark brown, to dark Effective rooting depth is more than 60 inches.
brown and very dark grayish brown, when moist. The Bt These soils are used for irrigated vegetable crops,irrigated
. horizon ranges in texture from silty clay loam to heavy silt berries, orchards, small grain, hay, irrigated pasture,
loam,and it is 25 to 35 percent clay.In places the structure of recreation,homesites,and wildlife habitat.
the B horizon is moderate or weak, prismatic breaking to
moderate, subangular blocky. The C horizon is medium Representative profile of Woodburn silt loam, 0 to 3
textured to moderately fine textured and commonly has percent slopes,located in the SW1/4NE1/4 section 20,T. 1
contrasting strata below a depth of 40 inches. N.,R.3 W.
44A-Willamette silt loam,0 to 3 percent slopes. Ap-0 to 5 inches,very dark grayish-brown (10YR 3/2)
This nearly level soil is on broad valley terraces. It has the silt loam, brown (10YR 5/3) dry; weak,
profile described as representative of the series. medium, subangular blocky structure;slightly
Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Amity hard, friable, slightly sticky and nonplastic;
Dayton,and Woodburn soils,which make up as much as 0
percent of this mapping unit. many fine roots; common, medium, irregular
p pp g ores;medium acid(pH 5.8);abrupt,smooth
Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight. boundary.6 to 10 inches thick.
Capability unit I-1;wildlife group 2.
44B-Willamette silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes. This
gently sloping soil is on broad valley terraces. Al2-5 to 11 inches, very dark grayish-brown (10YR
Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Amity, 3/2)silt loam,brown(10YR 5/3)dry;weak,
Dayton,and Woodburn soils,which make up as much as 10 medium subs fable, blocky structure;
percent of this mapping unit. slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky and
Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight. nonplastic;many fine roots;many,very fine,
Capability unit Ile-1;wildlife group 2. tubular pores;medium acid(pH 5.6) ;clear,
44C-Willamette silt loam,7 to 12 percent slopes smooth boundary/.0 to 8 inches thick.
This moderately sloping soil is on broad valley terraces. B It-11 to a inches,brown 1 O 5/4) 3/3)silt loam,
yellowish brown(]OYR 5/4)dry;moderate,
fine and very fine, subangular blocky
structure; slightly hard, plastic; many fine
roots; many, fine, tubular pores; thick clay
films in pores;
14
medium acid (pH 5.6) ; gradual, smooth Aloha,Amity,Willamette,Helvetia,and Dayton soils,which
boundary.0 to 7inches thick. occupy as much as 15 percent of this mapping unit.
B21t-16 to 26 inches,dark-brown(10YR 4/3)silty clay Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight.
loam, light yellowish brown(10YR 6/4)dry; Capability unit IIe-2;wildlife group 2.
moderate, fine, and very fine, subangular 45C-Woodburn silt loam,7 to 12 percent slopes.
blocky structure; hard, firm, slightly sticky This soil is moderately sloping.
and plastic;many fine roots;many,very fine, Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Aloha,
tubular pores;thick clay films on peds and in Amity,Willamette,Helvetia,and Dayton soils,which occupy
pores;medium acid(pH 5.8);•clear, smooth as much as 15 percent of this mapping unit.
boundary.7 to 10 inches thick. Runoff is medium,and the hazard of erosion is moderate.
B22t-26 to 31 inches,dark-brown(10YR 4/3)silty clay Capability unit Ile-2;wildlife group 2.
loam, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; common 45D-Woodburn silt loam,12 to 20 percent slopes.
fine,distinct,dark grayish-brown(10YR 4/2) This moderately steep soil is along terrace escarpments.
and grayish-brown (2.5YR 5/2) mottles; Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Aloha,
weak, medium, and fine, subangular blocky Amity, Willamette, Helvetia , Dayton soils, which
structure; hard, firm, slightly sticky and occupy as much as 15 percent o this mapping unit.
plastic; few fine roots; many, fine and very Runoff is medium,and the hazard of erosion is moderate.
fine, tubular pores; common thick clay films Capability unit IIIe-5;wildlife group 2.
in pores and on peds; few, fine, black
manganese stains; medium acid (pH 6.0) ;
gradual, smooth boundary. 4 to 10 inches
thick.
B3-31 to 41 inches, dark grayish-brown (10YR 4/3)
silty clay loam, pale brown (IOYR 6/3) dry; Xerochrepts and Haploxerolls,very steep
common, fine, distinct, dark grayish-brown
(10YR 4/2) and grayish-brown (2.5YR 5/2) 46F-Xerochrepts and Haploxerolls, very steep. This
mottles; weak, medium and fine. subangular undifferentiated group is about 45 percent Xerochrepts and
blocky structure; hard, firm, slightly sticky about 45 percent Haploxerolls. It occurs as steep to very
and slightly plastic; few fine and medium steep escarpments along the small streams that have cut
roots; common, fine and very fine, tubular deeply into the valley terraces and where the terraces meet
pores; few thick clay films in larger pores; the bottom lands and flood plains along major streams and
medium acid (pH 6.0) ; gradual, smooth rivers.These soils are well drained.They formed in a mixture
boundary.0 to 12 inches thick. of silt,sand,and an accumulation of material that has moved
C-41 to 60 inches,dark grayish-brown(10YR 4/2)silt downslope. The short slopes range from 20 to 60 percent.
loam, light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) dry; Elevation is 50 to 450 feet. Vegetation is Douglas-fir,
many, distinct, grayish-brown (2.5YR 5/2), Oregon white oak, shrubs, forbs, and grasses. The average
dark grayish-brown(10YR 4/3 ) , and dark annual precipitation is 40 to 60 inches, average annual air
yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) mottles; temperature is 50°to 54°F,and the frost-free period is 165 to
massive; hard, firm, slightly sticky and 210 days.
slightly plastic;few fine roots;very few,fine, Included in mapping were areas of Hillsboro, Quatama,
tubular pores;medium acid(pH 6.0). Willamette,and Woodburn soils,which make up as much as
The A horizon has moist value of 2 or 3,chroma of 2 or 3, 15 percent of this mapping unit. Small seep spots and
and hue of 10YR.Dry value is 4 or 5,and chroma is 2 or 3. wet-season springs are also included.
Between depths of 10 and 20 inches,moist value and chroma Permeability is moderate to moderately slow. Available
range to 4.Distinct mottles are within a depth of 30 inches. water capacity is 10 to 12 inches. Water-supplying capacity
The B2 horizon ranges from heavy silt loam to silty clay is 22 to 26 inches. Effective rooting depth is more than 60
loam.Horizons below a depth of 30 inches are firm to very inches.
firm and are brittle. The solum is slightly acid to medium Runoff is rapid,and the hazard of erosion is severe.
acid. These soils are used for pasture,recreation,homesites,and
45A-Woodburn silt loam,0 to 3 percent slopes. wildlife habitat.Capability unit VIe;wildlife group 2.
This nearly level soil has the profile described as repre-
sentative of the series. Xerochrepts-Rock outcrop complex
Included with this soil in mapping were areas of Aloha,
Amity,Willamette,Helvetia,and Dayton soils,which occupy 47D-Xerochrepts-Rock outcrop complex. This coin-,
as much as 15 percent of this mapping unit. Alex is about 50 percent Xerochrepts and 30 percent Rock
Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight outcrop. It occurs in irregularly shaped areas southeast of
Capability unit IIw-1;wildlife group 2. Sherwood and is composed of shallow and very shallow soils
45B-Woodburn silt loam,3 to 7 percent slopes. 4 and barren exposures of basalt bedrock. Slope is 5 to 30
This soil is gently sloping. percent.The Xerochrepts formed in a mixture of silt and sand
Included with this soil in mapping were areas of too variable to map. Vegetation is low shrubs, Oregon white
oak, Douglas-fir, grasses, and forbs. The average annual
precipitation is
15
•
Hydrologic Soil Group
Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit—Washington County,Oregon
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI I Percent of A01
45A Woodburn silt loam.0 to C 0.8 66.2%
3 percent slopes
450 Woodbum silt loam,3 to C 0.4 33.8%
7 percent slopes
'Totals for Area of Interest(AOI)
1.21 100.0%
Table 13: Soil Hvdroloric Group
16
Table-4-4 MANNING'.S COEFFICIENTSP'K"FACTORS
r: 5 " " le e s tt�Time Calcal :ian� fcr 1l,cro,,ranhs
t1s `mil ' . s to Manning s °clues ttor:iniraal 3U ti. cif travel) : ...° ..`
Smooth surfaces(concrete, asphalt,gravel, or bare hand packed soil) 0.01
Fallow fields or loose soil surface(no residue) 0.05
Cultivated soil with residue cover(s#0.20 ft/ft) 0.06
Cultivated soil with residue cover(s> 0.20 ft/ft) 0.17
Short prairie grass and lawns 0.15 A
Dense grasses 0.24
Bermuda grass 0.41
Range (natural) 0.13
Woods or forest with light underbrush 0.40
Woods or forest with dense underbrush 0.80
1.0$00:400. :: 'C y , 4 1*6: . . .. K.4 ti`..:,.�..,7 Y�4 1.,. y 11 / ?
4
.
4::,,..:. rryng4::,::• ... :. , r..:.;;.s,r...zm}•::;:.gTZ;•.,.<:.b:::;:;:.:::v :: /-.;:?:,c:.?u,;: .....r, ,:, :
.. .. .,4..a. :-.t-...::..1..:....,.:. :..,,C..::.: G,;.... fC.::..•,., :...>..<.'., art?•:<k.: -.: .;,::':::fir:.}.:.:{•:-. :•::�:,+: �-y�,.:. .`�.... .}:a
,:. :...-.�Y�,. :::.:.. .. E,:.<ha,:.,.,,.F:-:.;.'E,,...,...:.,r,':4s.;:..,:::}.z,;;..,.:,:..,,,:.:;�>}:.::.}?.::;:,fh...c �..�>�.?�.�.r..'ix'r. •s,3::},;ri-''\^�.,`,...cr...:...:......: -
.Y...<..F-}aW v,W}:N. :51 H....},,:.}:•:R.•::•d vv-:•:}�:•.:...:.+, .. ::A+...v\a'/.:r: '?'
,
1. Forest with heavy ground litter and meadows(n=0.10) 3
2. Brushy ground with some trees (n=0.060) 5
3. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n=0.040) 8
4. High grass(n=0.035) 9
5. Short grass, pasture, and lawns(n=0.030) 11
6. Nearly bare ground (n=0.025) 13
7. Paved and gravel areas n=0.012) 27
1. Forested swale with heavy ground litter(n=0.10) 5
2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed (n=0.050) 10
3. Rock-lined waterway(n=0.035) 15
4. Grassed waterway(n=0.030) 17
5. Earth-lined waterway(n=0.025) 20
6. CMP pipe(n=0.024) 21
7. Concrete pipe(0.012) 42
8. Other waterways and pipe 0.508/n
u431'
itftIONSIERNMENSMaitnitaiNti
9. Meandering stream with some pools(n=0.040) 20
10. Rock-lined stream (n=0.035) 23
11. Grass-lined stream (n=0.030) 27
12. Other streams, man-made channels and pipe 0.807/n **
A
' :':j:':�;Si ii:i}Fii:isji:5:ji.:::j;::: j%:i::i:v::::::j::4o: •
...................................
.................................:.:::
.......::..::::::::::•\...M.r,n.. ...........v,...:::::.ii::«..iii:-:�:.::�<.:�::.::.}::::::.:.::�:.:::.:<.:4:;•ii::i:v:!;.i:i4:::-:;4:-::-::::::A:iY.SW}4i a:;.i:;4:;::i}i:<.i:;.}}::;.:::�:-::-........ -
Table 14: Manning Numbers
17
Table 4-3 MODIFIED CURVE NUMBERS
SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers
Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban, and urban land use for
Type lA rainfall distribution,24-hour storm duration. (Published by SCS in 1982
:a-v`�
4 vom .A " �t ): v y \ �a ;: a:n. � nft ;
t ..',�g• •a�F
a..\...
:te; T .'Nazi " HC <\q:: .m Y �,:.. � s � a
P`N
!
, 3 .., . �, : F Las � mx kti 4 ',bu ,3Y..e :3 4,.
°, S ` , .
3 N ti4 ' . .:''I. ' � '. .'v<;, Z � � `fO\ ; »6w 3« g ya a yx43:3" y.'.\. V'a
'' b ?N'...V3;
A''4%;a , M1:•'; �:4 \hE t xOMF R xu ;Cb" � � 4aKb S ��;:� � .�• x.` e'1� ¢ �zbec Z t^A % > 1 ; wJ ,. - ` 3 � �R � ; ^, 3,.. , • ,
,
+ " n \ O : ,V, r ^x Mxn R�a a ri? t • » >,. .M'
Cultivated land' Winter Condition 86 91 94 95
Mountain Open Areas: Low growing brush and grassland. 74 82 89 92
Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89
Wood or forest land: Undisturbed 42 I 64 76 1 81
Established second growth` 48 68 78 83
Young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86
Orchard: With over crop 81 88 92 94
Open spaces,lawns,parks,golf courses,cemeteries, landscaping
Good Condition: Grass cover on>=75%of area 68 80 86 90
Fair Condition: Grass cover on 50-75%of area 77 85 90 92
Gravel Roads and Parking Lots: 76 85 89 91
Dirt Roads and Parking Lots: 72 82 87 89
Impervious surfaces,pavement,roofs,etc. 98 98 98 98
Open water bodies: Lakes,wetlands,ponds,etc. 100 I 100 1 100 _ 100
Single Family Residential 3:
Dwelling unit/gross acre %Impervious°
1.0 DU/GA 15
1.5 DU/GA 20
2.0 DU/GA 25
2.5 DU/GA 30
3.0 DU/GA 34 Select a separate curve
3.5 DU/GA 38 number for pervious and
4.0 DU/GA 42 impervious portions of the
4.5 DU/GA 46 site or basin.
5.0 DU/GA 48
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/GA 52
6.5 DU/GA 54
7.0 DU/GA 56
Planned Unit Developments, %impervious° Select a separate curve
condominiums,apartments, number for pervious and
commercial businesses& Must be computed impervious portions of the
industrial areas3 site or basin.
Table 1.5: Curve Numbers
18
APPENDIX B
SUPPORT INFORMATION
AND CALCULATIONS
19
BASIN ID: PST-2YR NAME: PST DEV 2 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 1.29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION • 2.50 inches AREA. . : 0. 16 Acres 1.13 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98 .00
TC ▪ 5. 00 min 5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0. 67 cfs VOL: 0.23 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min
BASIN ID: PST-10YR NAME: PST DEV 10 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 1.29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION 3.45 inches AREA. . : 0.13 Acres 1.16 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98.00
TC • 5.00 min 5. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0. 95 cfs VOL: 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: PST-25YR NAME: PST DEV 25 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 1.29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . .. : 3. 90 inches AREA. . : 0.13 Acres 1. 16 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98.00
TC • 5.00 min 5. 00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1.08 cfs VOL: 0.37 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
Table 16: 25-Year Storm Event Post Development Flow and Hvdrograph
20
BASIN ID: PRE-2YR NAME: PRE DEV 2 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 1.29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION • 2.50 inches AREA. . : 1.29 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98.00
TC ▪ 20.23 min 20.23 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.30 cfs VOL: 0.12 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: PRE-10YR NAME: PRE DEV 10 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA 1.29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION • 3.45 inches AREA. . : 1.29 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98.00
TC • 17.20 min 17 .20 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.56 cfs VOL: 0.20 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: PRE-25YR NAME: PRE DEV 25 YR STORM EVENT
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 0. 92 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION • 3. 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 13 Acres 1. 16 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 85.00 98 .00
TC • 16.20 min 16.20 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0. 95 cfs VOL: 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
Table 17: 25-Year Storm Event Pre Development Flow and Hvdrograph
21
Time of Concentration Calculations
Project: Broadway Roses Theater
Job Number: SOD002
Pre Development Conditions-2-yr Storm
Flow
Flow Mannings Length Slope P velocity Segment Tc Accuen.Tc
Segment Flow Type n (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (fps) (minutes) (minutes)
1 Sheet Flow 0.15 300 0.040 2.5 20.23 20.2
2 Shallow Conc. 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 Shallow Conc. 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 Ditch Flow 0.00 #D1Vl0! #DIV/0!
5 Ditch Flow 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Equation for Sheet Flow: Tt=0.42(n*L)o.8/[(p)o.527(s-o.4)]
where:
n Mannings roughness coefficient
L flow length(ft)
I 24-hr rainfall(in)
S slope of the hydraulic grade line(ft/ft)
Tt travel time(min)
Eauation for Shallow Conc. Flow:
velocity(fps)_ (II u =k*s^.5
where:
k= 0
s(ft/ft)= 0.04
v=k*sA2
Table 18: 2-}'ear Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration
Time of Concentration Calculations
Project: Broadway Roses Theater
.loh Number: SOD002
Pre Development Conditions-10-yr Storm
Flow
Flow Mannings Length Slope P velocity Segment Tc Accum.Tc
Segment Flow Type n (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (fps) (minutes) (minutes)
1 Sheet Flow 0.15 300 0.040 3.45 17.22 17.2
Table 19: 10-Year Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration
Time of Concentration Calculations
Project: Broadway Roses Theater
Job Number: SOD002
Pre Development Conditions-25-yr Storm
Flow
Flow Mannings Length Slope P velocity Segment Tc Accum.Tc
Segment Flow Type n (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (fps) (minutes) (minutes)
1 Sheet Flow 0.15 300 0.040 3.9 16.20 16.2
Table 20: 25-Year Storm Event Pre Development Time of Concentration
23
_, �,�
� ��!���'
� _
.,
PRE-APPLICATION ZOO,
� 11 �1O1 \1 LiWl \ VL iWQVLVl n', l . .
City of Ti�x�zl Pernat Ceruer 13125 SWHaII Blul, Ti�zrz� OR 97223
Phor� 503.639.4171 Far:503.598.1960
GENERAL INFORMATION
A,pplicant BROAD'�JAY ROSE THEATRE COMPANY
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Address: PO BOX 231004 Phone: -`�03-603-9$62
City: T I GARD ziP; 97281 Case No.: �QE��- Q07���
FRANCESCA GAMBETTI 503-242-0084 �ceiptNo.: "�^C?Zfv�f�
Contact Pe�on: Phone:
Application Accepted By: S. �.(,�-t'
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): Date: (Q��3��
TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT DATEOFPRE-APP.: 'l-'�a�(o���
Address: 6960 SW SANDBURG ST Phone: 503-431-4001 TIME OF PRE-APP.: /(> ��
Ciry: TIGARD zip; 97223 PRE-APP.HELDWITH
Rev.7/5/06
Property Address/Location�S�: c\tucpin\mutecsVuid use applicatioas\PmApp Request App.doc
12850 SW GRAiVT ST, TIGARD, OR 97223
�2UIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMEN?S
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2512 CB, LOT 200 (Note: applications will not be accepted
without the required submittal elements)
Zoning: �12 � Pre-Application Conf.Request Form
Site Size: 5 ACI�tS (ENTII�E PROPERTY)
5 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING•
� Brief Description of the Proposal and any
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION site-specific questions/issues that you would
like to have staff research prior to the
All of the information identified on this fonn are required to be submitted by meeting.
the applicant and received by the Planning Division a nununum of one (11 � Site Plan. The site plan must show the
week �rior to officially scheduling a �re-ap�lication conference date/time to proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn
allow staff ample time to prepare for the meetmg. to scale. Also, show the location of the
subject property in relation to the nearest
A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the streets; and the locations of driveways on the
Plaruiing Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesdav or Thursday subject properryand across the street.
momines. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long, and are rypically � VicinityMap.
held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM
� The Proposed Uses.
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDiILED IN � Topographic Infornlation. Include Contour
PERSON AT THE COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER I,ines if Possible.
FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY.
❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a
IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXI'ECTED TO ATTEND THE MONOPOLE project, the applicant must
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROLJI', PLEASE �� attach a copy of the letter and proof in the
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM form of an affidavit of mailing, that the
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE collocauon pmtocol was completed (see
GROIJI'. Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard Community
Development Code).
� Filing Fee$362.00
June 2007 July 2007
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
',, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 �� ', 8 9 10 t 1 12 13 14 �.
10 1t t2 13 14 15 76 . 15 16 17 16 79 20 21
17 18 �9 20 2i 22 23 � 22 23 2a 25 26 27 28
24 25 26 27 28 29_ 30 29 30 31 �
- Tuesday, June 26, 2007 – — .
-Pre-Apps CD Meetin9s
�--- — Early i i
8:00 AM '
--- —- ---- '
9:00 AM
10:00 AM (10:00 AM)(Tigard Tualatin School Dist. Francesca Gambetti 503-242-0084 12850 SW Grant Broadway
Rose Theatre)
— ----i
11:00 AM (11:00 AM) Gary Miniszewski 503-265-15901Brian Rager 503-718-2471 Senior Center Remodel
�
�
I
�-- — -- - -
� 12:00 PM
1:00 PM
' 2:00 PM — - --
' 3:00 PM - - --
; 4:00 PM
Late I I
I
� i
I �
I
i
I � I
I !
I
i I �
: � I
� � ;
� i �
i �
i '
; i ;
-Pre-Apps CD Meetings 1 6/14/2007-8:46 AM
Broadway Rose Theatre Project
Proposed Uses
Property Address: 12850 SW Grant Street, Tigard, OR 97223
Proposed Uses:
270-seat theatre
Office space for 5 atlministrative staff
82 parking spaces (32 aiready existing)
:�
Broadway Rose Theafre Project
Project Description 8�Site-Specific Questions for Pre-Application Conference
Property Address: 12850 SW Grant Street, Tigard, OR 97223
Project Description: The Broadway Rose Theatre Company proposes to renovate and expand
the old cafetorium at CF Tigard Elementary School into a theatre space. The existing 10,600 sf
building will be renovated and a new lobby and scene shop will be added to expand the facility to
13,200sf. The project will provide a 270-seat theatre, office space for atlministrative staff and 82
parking spaces (32 already existing).
Questions for Pre-Application Conference:
Will a traffic study be required for the project?
We have received confirmation that we will be able to simultaneously pursue the CU approval and
the building permits. Is there anything special we neetl to do to proceed with this dual process?
.�
_ � ` ,
I
,
• �
VICINITY MAP LOCATI4N MAP
NOT TO SCALE � NOT TO SCALE �
�#A�r°a�J��iT Y � �y %� - � '= _ .. 300vn �iN4arn��s�r ;
'' Svr Cascade a+te �''�.^�;:_.�J E �� Sw Sprute St ��9Dafl ��G` �+t� --_,. _y�. .'� .- n�273f1
��^�� SN 7Aotn St 2.� .�'° ;�tl�''fi _ �'Ji�. ��,�`'a y,�oh ,*}
: �"R' �'�. v,_ . �.�..�t - ly .
N � � a `_�� �I � 5'�qa 'SRF� t�, ��'' �y��*aU .�i
� '.w '"4,� � ' �`- ,.*
� ;n '� �!�, �
'c ' ' �51Y97L1f CL � ? y "+.�"11;,7 ' t, aL�`ti�� } LJ`i 4Q•�, @J���•t ` •SVy '�,�-�� ,t�'r¢f J .
. .� :. - 'N.w o .. �Q _
:�p -'° . ry �., f�4 s . ___' • . O�� � t��� 3
�"+h �' �_. , � ' � � ���� . �.�,`? ..
,, l�..�t� �
� '� � . U t�, �JZ � ' .1/'1 . wrF� .�- `,_ ' 4 - ,�
...b � $W g$Ul AYC �}ti 'S `4 '�»i...- �. � ri e�. . . n,r,j , __. - � �'�£.
� � if5�, Ly' . x'i '�'"
_ 5�,ti Nxic3 Ln �ry,� �' �r� cjt� ' 3 �, �'
N r .
'._ ,� /�'C fF,'`'n ` i� . �' N ,.a :r O .�'�. . i�"�� F�..'
_ � ` � .
�',._ - 4, �Caurt � �6�� t�y k � ." S�y,Oanr�o�J� , n` . c i` � � .,� `�P� .
,
• � " � -
� y;t �,
�
�� r' �"� F' � � . "�R 7 � � T;-F���' "--� 1'N
i
Y. � �.
�+C,; 'g' - .
�� � .(ig�a►d �- `"�, Sw Elmhurst Sc
r' .. - `,y' i? `°�:�,� Sw Hemauso►ray . _ �: � �h''a� s
_ ' • .
S .•,=3 Sw � ` ; �� 's',
�?
- , .g . . h��of �, jtb �: S `� �vefa��dqp „ ,,of
iy,�`a� �y�t . � . �f�rh `ry,,, ' wy�nli, a'� Sw fonaa�a 5t 3 '� C'' � `!�� ���;
_!J(/f " .. .� ' �4 "''' 1 . . �
� �
:'.
5f �ys\. 's7 3� ,�i� 4'� .��. ;�w ISam�rton 5t � '��° sh" �`'''���
�ry ' � Ca `�`i,� Sy, . " \
F�a" �/
., : � � a �
. , � v'� "*,;��. ;^ ' . . t�, s�f
,
r.
: .
.�
.
�{'� .: • , S� ` ` '"E.�;"..., � � ',, �.� �`�
. t�.°' -�T �"`�'• '�i �� . �. � ��`'�.''. �' , , � '�
,". , S�v Vams,S� ' � � S•�
.
,..., � ,,,. .._ .. . ,��> �._ - ... _-� �°� i ,r'� ... . Cj
� .G�
FanrpPar(. � SWfRt
y �,, `��`'� �
� ` � Sw Fir St c � "F4:
� .�. � . �y . _.. . .� . . ,_ �$:�.'+ .�.•,: , ,, � . . �` .� �j\��,
� ,• m _o- sw flmara St : ; i>; sr.eher Ur ` c'� _�Sw Pa�k:st �?� . s� t r 3♦�
„ .� _ ��; __ . _ - ry
r, .
.�,- y� ; d ,� _, . �' .'- � . . C '' ~�
a. '� Sln_Edger,road St m � f;.' :''\
,D � , ,� : �n.� �� Sw T841Y C�et{k F'�- � . . .. �'r � . . . �z.
4 ' � �
,ry Sw MeDanald st � sri Char Ct r'G � .
- ��a.w �"`,F"-��'° ' ' 'x
., _. .
_ ,`
,� .c� .•, ; :, - ,,�t�.
� $N'�fift.Y�r+d Ln ,�_. _. . �Y!gIdC�J3k5 Lf1�? . , �� . � � _ . , .�. . �
, ., _.._. , .r��_''.._ ^..� �, ' . ��A �r�{' �:,�� ��J
,• ' F��. � ���
�_ � � _ �' �' �` ''�-�-' �
: �, - Eon��� ;;� �
__ � . : '
.
.
__:�. 9'-M►u' . _ �' : y _ ��
,..
�'
� '
s,
,, .
� - sw 1�._ - _. -
° Sw BanRa Rd. + , _' ;
. ,— > >.,..�-<��2407 NX�k'iEQ �OZpltl.��p�kE�"t,kr.
�Y2907htaa uzs3.lG�•- .' r"----`--- r._' _ , . , :--.e�.. " ` • ,j,. >. ', ,.:A20�7NY�VTEQ
BROADWAY ROSE BROADWAY ROSE
r
. �
PRE-APPLICATION CONf ERENCE NOTES "
� ..
➢ EHGINEERIHG SECTION Q CRyefllgard,Oregm
�'ommunity l�eve(�rpment
Sfia � A�BetterCommun'
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tex Mep[Sl: 2s�o2c6
Tax Loasl: 200
Use T�me: CUP
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW School Street to 27 feet total (7 additional feet required)
� SW Highway 99 to 52 feet from centerline or greater if required by ODOT
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW School Street, to include:
� 16 feet of pavement
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
� Other: No access to Highway 99
CITY OF T1611RD Pre-Applicatlon Co�erenc�Nates Page 1 rf 6
Englneerlag De�artwsotSsctloo
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Hic�hway 99, to include:
� 36 feet of pavement from centerline
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 10-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
� Other: Access must be aliqned with Garrett Street - close existing access at easement
located at SW property line. Contact ODOT for additional requirements.
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicadon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6
Engineering Uepar[ment SecUon
� ❑•street signs, traffic �� �trol devices, streetlights and a two-� �r streetlight fee.
. ❑ Other:
Aareement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.)
�2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Grant
Avenue and School Street (If paid with prior projects, provide information so not charqed a
second time). Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities
underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Grant Avenue.
The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's
responsibility to extend the sewer to serve the development.
Water Supply:
The City of Tiqard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This
service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed
development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
CITY OF T16AR� Pre-Applicadon Ce�cr�nce N,t�s Page 3�f 6
Eeg1�s�H�g Psputmeat Sectl�o
' Storm Sewer Improvements:
� All proposed development with��� the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed.
On-site detention is required.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The
resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-
site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not
the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious
surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary
sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development
application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
� Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu.
All new impervious surface area runoff must be treated. See CWS Table 4-? to determine how much
or rhe existing impervious surface area runoff must be treated.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
1) Traffic Sfudy requirements are outlined in 18.810.030.AC. Address this in the narrative.
2) lmprovements along School Street will be determined by a rough-proportionality analysis.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pr�-Applicatlon Cemer�nce N�tes Page 4,f 6
Ee'Ie��na'Ye�art,eat S�cuee
• Pay the TIF
PERMITS
Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a perFormance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
CITY OF T16ARD Pn-Applicatlon C�Mer�nc�Net�s Page 5 N 6
Eqle��rlog�eo�rtmsptssetl�e
� .
� � `' � Fo� a land partition, thF �plicant must obtain an Engineerir �ermit, if required, and return a
: mylar copy of the recor. . plat to the City prior to issuance o. .� permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: — 1 � _ �Z • �
EMGINEERING DEPARTME T STAFF DATE
Phone: [5031639-4171
Fax: [50316240752
document2
Revised: September 2,2003
CITY OF T16ARD Pr�-Applicatl�n C�m�rence N�t�s Page 6 d 6
Ei'f�e�rl�e�er�rt�nt Saetle�
. / '
�ITY �F TIGARD ,,
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ° �
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) � � �
�ra�a� � �.�b - �''7
�,bra� C�K-.�KSM/ M�
- � - NON-RESIDENTIAL
APPLICANT: ���v���l�,,��:u-, �c,:,.c -Th�a.�,-t- AGENT: fYQnC E�S ��� �Q�h.�th.
Phone: (���.�� (:v �-� °;S� � Phone: (�,��� ,��a — oaa�f
PROPERTY LOCATION: �
ADDRESS/GENERAL L4fATI0N: � I<�y `>c' ;;�.; '„ ;�;,� S+
TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): :�?S �oa C� j� �,�c_=�2 0 0
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: C;�:� d; -h � � � I u;�. �t��:��,;� (C�.�>)
PROP4SALDESCRIPTION: C�CDant� �cr� ex�s+;,-,ti b �� �d:,��, c�u4c �fur,�;,�,) �% ��� cL
�laoc� � dd,J; �;o,� . �h ��Fv > <<se ' tt hl a- �`7v -st�� s
--� r r /�
�'�'1�0_�Yt ii�'�c{ C'��iC2 <�PG�- tGl Yi�Y�����iSt✓'. +1 �'{ S��tfi
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: iule�� � �,rv-, 1`��=,s ; l-v, u,;-, ; ,��,, ���� I
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ��—I�
IONING DISTRICT OIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.��� � � l
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft.
Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: = =' % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area::�i �- %.
/-. � , , _ ��,. ,;� ., i, ,i- '
� NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meebng Handoutl
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED
PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISI�N of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use
Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to
submitting vour application or the application will not be accepted.
* NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicafionlPlanning Division Section
�(] NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Ch ;r 18.390)
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review
the code for applicable criteria.
� IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at larg e, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not
roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
� ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651
,-Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width:
Minimum pavement width:
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas:
'"J :�" , . . �� , C 1�1.� .-t� ( � ,��,,�,t�: � 1 ')ct � i( . �. �� <)�,Gc : S ,. , -{'�c' SCI��:f S� J< <-�;
�-+ . . � S j c' P;/�.
❑x WALKINAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18]05.0301 ,F '�`.-=
WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and
industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide
convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial
complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and
neighboring developments.
❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1301
➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of
➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary.
➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK.
❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ
BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a
height of 75 feet provided that:
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2) of the building's height; and
➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district.
� BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are
described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous
and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal
plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if
not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences,
utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be
found in the Development Code.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8
NON-Residen6al Applica6oNPlanning Division Sec6on
The ESTIMATED REQUI, � BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to v� proposal area are:
feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary.
feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary.
IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:
� LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the
branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised
planters.
� RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at (503) 625-6177.
0 PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401
REQUIRED parking for this type of use: � . �,�� ` • �-� `�
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):
SECONDARY USE REC�UIRED parking:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES.
PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches.
Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that
separates the parking space from an adjoining space.
Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can
be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as
landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements.
HANDICAPPED PARKING:
➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED
DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking
spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted.
➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and
in convenient locations.
[� LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080]
Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be
provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City
Engineer.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section �
� � BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Cod ;ction 18.7651
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile tra�c and in
convenient locations.
❑ SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibilitv to preciselv
identifv sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibilitv of the applicant. Areas
meetinq the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the
development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.T15.080.C1
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
� CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to CWS R&0 07-20/USA Regulatlons-Chapter 3l
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Desi n Criteria:
The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths:
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION 8� ORDER 07-20
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT 4 WIDTH OF VEGETATED
TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: �25�
� 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25/ 50 feet
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
• Natural lakes and onds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: �25�
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure
♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in
• Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine6
Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement.
SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
' NON-Residen6al ApplicalionlPlanning�ivision Section
� Restrictions in the Ve et� :orridor:
NO structures, deve opn�..��t, construction activities, gardens, �awns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the
CWS Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Veqetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
-� CWS Service Provider Letter:
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20
sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a
CWS Service Provider Letter is not required.
� SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.180]
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
� TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.)90.030.CJ
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a
development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development,
or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. �
THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:
➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated
as significant by the City;
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
� Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation
program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
� Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-
thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
� Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%
of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
� Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
� MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.T90.060.E1
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
NON-ResidenGal ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section
� ➢ If a replacement ti �f the size cut is not reasonably av ale on the local market or would
not be viable, the L,�rector shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance
with the following formula:
� The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated
caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably
available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the
subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted
on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner,
private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree
replacement.
�] CLEAR YISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapier 18.7951
The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT (�8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the clear vision area.
❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot-wide access easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
CODECHAPTERS
_� 18.330(Condi6onal Use) �H.6ZO(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) _ �S.76O(Nonconforming Situa6ons)
_ 18.340(Director's Incerpretation) �H.C3O(Washington Square Regional Center) �� 18.765(off-Street ParkinglLoading Requirements)
_ �H.35O(Planned oevebpment) 1 S.64O(Durham Quarry�esign 5tandards) 18.775(5ensitive Lands Review)
_ 18.3G0(site Development Review) x 1 H.7O5(AccesslEgresslCiroulation) X �$.780(Signs)
_ �$.370(Variances/Adjustments) �H.7�O(Accessory Residen6al Units) _ 'I$.7$5(Temporary Use Permits)
_ �$.380(Zoning Mapffext Amendments) �S.7�5(Densiry Computa6ons) � �$.790(Tree Removal)
_ 18.385(Misce��aneous Permits) �S.7ZO(Design Compatibility Standards) X 18.795(Vsual Clearance Areas)
_� �8.390(Decision Making Proceduresllmpact Study) n 15.725(Environmental Performance 5tandards) _ 18.795�reless Communication Facilities)
_ �$.4'I O(Lot Line Adjustmenis) �S.73O(Exceptions To Devebpment Standards) � �8.5�O(Street 8 Utiliry Improvement Standards)
_ �H.42O(Land Parfitions) 1 S.74O(Historic Oveday)
_ 18.430(Subdivisions) 'I$.74Z(Home Occupation Permits)
_� 18.51 O(Residentlal Zoning Districts) x �H.T45(Landscaping&5creening Standards)
_ 1 H.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) �S.75O(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regula6ons)
_ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 1� 'I$.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecycling Storage)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
NON-Residential Applica6on/Planning Division Section
� AD�ITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEA.
A ���lCD.�Ci� �� E titl.� +��v,C,�"� �,��Ctr,(SCI � d..., {.0 : _,�v,, �t;.,d:-�,li 4� 1 „lS� (( (
�1 L;�.,1/l� I 1'1 � ��� I(� � 3�C� . {-CC�V,_`.i C' l .� (��rf C t-_'Y��- c-i�ii. t� l=i:_� -f"l�t C. t�,� ��, GJ
JC�C:T1U "i �.: �����?�� C.��>�t�_ .
�X�l�{'�� •�'� �'a � :'`�,,1(_� �f'_�_ �JC'_ �t�vf't •� � r� � � �:� t,. , (Z . �� {''• y- . ��.✓, �� , [. � �. .�
J
� nr1f1�G� C 1.'r�ir � rl �.'�-Rr.)mC.t��. ��1�. c'Pc`�°, ,.ir,� p�t�IL.t- '�c3 iL r �,; iS ytu � [`� l�rr��,.r.�
Ct.;i cj f'cz�� r ,��.�, i. ��� Yl P� _��Y'Z,��l-ve�t u � r{?��d�r.-i C•i f ,„ �-{J ' r ri- '" + l�z-- _T
��1����it•�. Sfti�.�le.,f� ����{r' +`��`��1 �,�1 ���c ,��9 � 5 �� n l �� _ _�2(� �P�f� <c':� j�<T Z.��S
l
� r� ,'�7y; ( n �c� l i� 'I`t��� .�t .
' �.,',�� � a�.t.i(.�.-� U i � �t � l��.- <.<i. �?. � 1Y��.;.�t ��i< c t -�F'ii rP�i�dr,t��i� ��� �
c; � i�� 'l(�� . 03� � C
PROCEDURE
Administrative Staff Review.
,/ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendatian on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications
submitted bv mail or dropped off at the counter without Plannina Division acceptance mav be
returned. The Planninq counter closes at 5:00 PM.
Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/2" x 11". One 8'/z" x 11"
ma o a ro ose ro'ect sha I be submitte or attac ment to t e sta re ort or
administrative decision. Applications with un olded maps shall not e accepted
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the
application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8
NON-Residen6al ApplicationlPlanning Divis'ron SecGon
�
The administrative decisic r public hearing will typically occur� oximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as peing complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard ;�, a-�.� ��;. �."� c� 1 . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review process is av ilable from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
BUILDING PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policv is to applv those svstem
development credits to the first buildinq permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS
OBTAINED).
e con erence an notes cannot cover a o e requirements an aspects re ate to
site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan., Failure of the staff to provide
information required b the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended tha�a prospectiye applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or
ask an questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submittin an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: (�I'1C;+�ti I Cct���e S �� L�c��,-�a--�
�
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING
PHONE: 503-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-)191 DIRE�T: 503-118- � `� ''�1
EMAIL• c,�z:�, i �� @tigard-or.gov
TITLEI8([ITY OF TIGARD'S fOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNETADDRESS: WWW.tigard-or.gov
H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 13-Jun-07
(Engineering section:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8
NON-Residen6al ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
Cheryl Caines
From: Cheryl Caines
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:57 AM
To: francesca@sojpdx.com
. Subject: Broadway Rose
. Francesca,
I'm reviewing the Broadway Rose application and need a couple of items. Could you please send over copies of the
following?
1-Do you have a site plan or floor plan that clearly indicates the building additions? I'm guessing where they are based
on an aerial photograph, but want to make sure I'm guessing correctly.
2-Do you have a site plan that shows the property line along the Grant Street turnaround?
3-Can I get a copy of the detail sheet A1.03? Plan A1.02 keeps referring to it, but I do not have a copy.
I may have more questions as I go through the application, but this is it so far.
Thank you,
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
City of Tigard
(503) 718-2437
1
2/20/2008
. CITY OF TIGARD , 526:19PM
13125 SH'Hall Blvd. 1 .
� I'igard,OR 97223 (503)639-�3171
Conditions Associated With Case #: CUP2007-00002
Project Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO
CURRENT STATUS UPDATED
# DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE BY DATF, BY
1 REVIS�D S'rlE PLAI� - E Y SL3 GRAi`T N CAC I;'?8;2008 MSB
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for review and approval showing the front
yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN N CAC ll28/2008 MSB
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for review and approval that shows the
following prior to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer running along the northern property,except where the existing parking area prohibits installation.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
3 VERIFICATION OF APP FOR TRASH ENC M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the
location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements.
4 SHOW 4 ACCESSIBLE PKG SP ON PLAN M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
4. Prior to issuance of site permits,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing four accessible parking spaces as
required by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code.
5 SUBMIT CONST DRAW-TREE 1SSUES N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
5. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawin;s to both Planning and Engineering that
include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees and trees ]0022/10023 if these two trees will
be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles,machinery,grading,dumping,storage>burial of debris,or any other
construction-related activities in any tree protection zone;and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this
report.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title,any party found to be in violation of this chapter[18.790] pursuant to
Chapter i.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to$500 and shall be required to remedy
any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include,but not be limited to,the following: 1)Replacement of
unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060(D)of the Tigard Development Code;and 2)
Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree,as
determined using the most current International Sociery of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal.
6 ESTABLISH TPZ/INSPECTION N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
6. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees
to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring
the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately.
7 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the
City Arborist,at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation through the building construction phases.The reports shall evaluate the condition
and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree
Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals,and if it
appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop
work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any
CeRificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection
Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site a,�healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing
environment.
Ping-CaseConditions rpt Page 1 of 3
� CURRENT STATUS UPDATED
# DESCRTPTION STATUS* DATE BY DATE BY
8 RESTRICTIONS FOR WORK WITHIN TPZ N CAC 1/28/?008 MSB
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone,the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the
construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees.The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone.The City Arborist may require changes
priar to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a
summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stability
of the trees.
9 BLDG PERMIT SITE PLAN REQ N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
9. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant(developer or builder)shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that were preserved,the location of tree protection
fencing.
B. Submit a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist regarding building and infrastructure siting
techniques to be employed in construction with respect to any protected trees on site.
10 ACCESS DRIVE VISION CLEARANCE M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
10. Priar to issuance of site permits,the applicant must submit a site plan showing how the vision clearance standards will be
met for both access drives.
11 PFI IS REQUIRED N KSM 1/28/2008 MSB
11. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover street
improvements and any other wark in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be
submitted for review to the Engineering Department.NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the
Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's
web page(www.tigard-or.gov).
12 LEGAL NAME OF PERMITTEE ON PFI N KSM 1/28/2008 MSB
12. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within
which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information
to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
13 PRIVATE WATER QUALITY FACILITY N KSM 1/28/2008 MSB
13. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department(Kim McMillan)as a part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans. Included with the plans shall be
a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan.
14 EROS[ON CONTROL PLAN N KSM 1/28/2008 MSB
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit drawings. The plan
shall conform to the 'Brosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,February 2003 edition."
15 1200-C GENERAL PERMIT REQ N KSM 1/28/2008 MSB
15. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the
Federal Clean Water Act.
16 ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
16. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall submit plans that indicate the location of all rooftop equipment and
the gas meter.
17 ILLUMINATION PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
17. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit for review and approval a revised site plan showing
the areas illuminated by the proposed and existing lighting.
18 OBTAIN SIGN PERMITS N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
18. Prior to placement of any signs on site,the applicant shall apply for a sign permit and supply stafFwith the appropriate
plans to verify compliance with TDC Chapter 18.780.
19 DEED RESTRICTION FOR TREES N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
19. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater
than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed
restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die
or be removed as a hazardous tree.
Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page 2 of 3
Updat�c�2C�q�ng itions
/ /
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
re�-iew and approval showing the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
"1'he setback sho���n is from the curb. '�o plans sho�v the right-of-��-a�� line,which appears to
be about 20 feet frorn the curb.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for
review and approval that shows the following pnor to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
This can be deferred until pnor to mechanical/electrical.
B. Parking lot trees at a rario of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
�1et.
C. The �roposed buffer running along the northern property, except where the
e�sting parking area prohibits installarion.
�1et.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
Can be deferred until prior to mechanical.
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verificauon from the franchise
waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their
requirements.
:�tet.
4. Prior to issuance of site permits, the applicant shall submit a re��ised site lan
showing four accessible parking spaces as required by the 2004 Oregon �tructural
Specialty Code.
:�1et.
S. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Planning and Engineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees
and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. r1 note prohibiting equipment,�ehicles, machinery,grading, dumping,
storage,burial of debris, or any other construction-rclatcd acrivities m any
tree protection zone; and
C. A note stating that only those trees idenrified on the approved Tree Removal
plan are authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other
�ro�rision of this ride, any part�� found to be in violarion of this chapter
18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be
subject to a civil penalty of up to �500 and shall be required to remedy any
damage caused by the violarion. Such remediarion shall include, but not be
limited to, the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged
trees in accordance with Secrion 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development
Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the
estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined
using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for
Plant Appraisal.
See 'l�odd's Comments regarding tree protection. 1�hese_�s was discussed at the public
hearing, the fencing is bein�required not just for construcuon activit�, but also for trucks
enterin�the site and matenal storage. These comments were�iven prior to the
deternunation of the remo�al of trees 10022/10023. I've copied Todd's notes below:
Per Condition 5, the construction drawings need to show protection for the trees to be
retained (trees 10000-10017 and 10019-10023). Protection is also required for street
trees that are to remain. Chain link fencing is required for those trees that are in close
proximity to construction activities (trees 10005-10017 and 10019-10023). The
remaining site trees (10000-10004) and street trees can be protected with orange
construction fence. The dimensions of the tree protection zone need to be per the project
arborist's recommendations from 8-2-07 and drawn to scale on the plans (grading plan).
The plans (grading plan) also need to include the tree preservation notes from the project
arborist's 8-2-07 plan as well as the additional preservation notes in Conditions 5 and 8.
Finally, the tree preservation plan needs to include a signature of approval from the
project arborist.
6. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as ciirected by
the pro�ect arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an
inspectton and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the
tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately.
Must be installed and insPected prior to issuance of Building Permit. Call"1'odd for an
inspecrion once Randv Itillen has approved it. Todd can be reached at (503) 718-2700.
7. The a�plicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project
Arborist has submitted written reports to the City r�rborist, at least once every two
weeks, as the Project r�rborist morutors the construcuon acuvities from initial tree
protecrion zone (TPZ) fencing installation through the building construcrion phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condition and locanon of the tree protection fencin�,
deternune if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protecnon
Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the Ciry rlrborist at the
scheduled intenrals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protecnon Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the Ciry can stop work on the
project until an ins ecrion can be done by the Ciry Arborist and the Project r�rborist.
Prior to issuance o�any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a
final certification indicatuig the elements of the Tree Protecnon Plan were followed
and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their
modified growing environment.
C)n-going.
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist
shall prepare a proposal detailing the constructton techniques to be employed and
the likel}�impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
City rlrborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protecnon zone. The
City Arborist may require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on
site while work is occurring within the tree protecdon zone and submit a summary
rep�rt certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly
impact the health and/or stability of the trees.
C'7rading is proposed within the tree protection area of#10014 to construct the water quality
swale. Has rhis been considered b�� the arborist%
9. Prior to issuance of building pertnits, the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan dYawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were�reserved, the locat�on of tree protecrion fencing.
B. Submtt a statement and signature of approval fYOm a cerrified arborist
regarding building and infrastructure sittng techniques to be employed in
construcnon with respect to any protected trees on site.
Samc as abo�-e.
10. PYior to issuance of site permits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
�7et. See Sheet ��1.00.�.
MEMORANDUM ,
� 1�������
SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS , P. C. � �
,
architecture I planning I exterior restoration I interior design
C:ITti'•,�t � ;c,r�H[�
DATE O2IO7IO8 _ �_A��I . �(�(1l�I��F�IM�
Cheryl Caines, Planning Department
Kim McMillan, Engineering Department
TO
FROM Tim Ayersman
PROIECT � No. 07001/Broadway Rose Theatre Company
FILE NUMBER M:\07001\Doc1CUP2.doc
�ISTRIBUTION file
S�a,EOT Conditional Use Permit (2007-00002)
REMARNS
1. The setbacks for Grant Avenue have been submitted. See sheet A1.00A.
2. The landscaping/site requirements have been submitted. See sheet A1.02.
A. Refer to Landscape Notes 6A and 9.
B. One tree for every seven parking spaces has been shown on the site plan. ✓
See sheet A1.02.
C. The buffer has been shown on the site plan. See sheet A1.02 ✓
D. The mechanical is design build, the locations of the roof top unit and gas
meter will be a deferred submittal and will be submitted by the contractor for
the mechanical permit. See A1.02 general note 6 and landscape note 10 for
screening. , - •
3. See attached approval letter from Pride Disposal.
4. Four ADA parking stalls have been added to sheet A1.02..�
5.
a. Trees 10022 and 10023 are to be removed no protection is required for
them. See sheet 1 of 1 Tree Plan by AKS Arborist Randy Killen for all other
tree protection measures. � � ' � ^ �� • i �'
b. This note has been provided refer to the Tree Plan. See Tree Preservation
Note ,�A" � �; , ,
c. This note has been added to sheet A1.01 general notes #5. �
6. This will be done.
7. This will be done.
8. This will be done. No work is scheduled to be done within an established tree
protection zone at this time. ���'`' `�"`'' ����' �'���� � ;
1200 NW Naito Parkway,Suite 410 I Portland,Oregon 97209 I 503.228.5817 I rnx 503.273.8584 I www.sdra.com
��EMORANDUM
' 2/7/2008
PAGE 2
9. a. See sheet 1 of 1 Tree Plan by AKS Arborist Randy Killen.
b. See sheet 1 of 1 Tree Plan by AKS Arborist Randy Killen.
10. See sheet A1.00A for Vision Clearance Areas and sheet A1.02 for relocated new
trees due to this requirement.
1 1.Three sets have been submitted for a Public Facility Improvement permit per Kim
McMillan's request.
12.The legal name is, The Broadway Rose Theatre Company, the address is, P.O. Box
231004 Tigard, Oregon 97281, and the telephone number is, 503-603-5262. The
entity is a 501 C3 incorporated nonprofit. Incorporated in Oregon and the corporate
contact is Sharon Maroney.
13.Water quality facility plans and calculations have been submitted refer to Drainage
Report and Civil drawings. A landscape and maintenance plan has been submitted
refer to sheet A1.02.
14. See sheet C1.1 and C1.2 for erosion control plan and details.
15. We have submitted for a 1200-C General Permit.
16. Plans indicating rooftop equipment and gas meter locations will be submitted by the
design-build contractor prior to issuance of the mechanical permit. This has been
noted on sheet A1.02 General Note #6.
17. Plans showing areas illuminated by the proposed and existing lighting will be
submitted by the design-build contractor prior to issuance of the electrical permit.
This has been noted on sheet A1.02 General Note #1.
18. — 24. Will be satisfied prior to the final building inspection.
ENGINEERIVG FLANNING LANllSCAI'E AItCHITECTtiRE
FORESTRY SliRVEYING
13910 S.W. Galbreath Dr., Suite lU0 � Oftices Located In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 �HERWOOD,OREGON
Phone� (503)925-8799 REDMOND,ORECiON
Fax: {503)425-R969 E�'GINEERING&Foxi:51'R�' VqNCOUVER,WASHINGTON -
w�vw.aks-e�.com
Date: February 7, 2008
To: Cheryl Caines
Assistant Planner
City of Tigard
Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Tree Letter far 12985 SW Grant Strect,Tigard Oi•egon
1VIS. Caines,
This letter is to satisfy section 12, subsection B of the conditions of approval for ihe constniction project
located at 12985 SW Gr�nt Street,Tigard Oregon. I reviewed the construction plans for 12985 SW Grant
Street, Tigard Oregon. Per the drawing provided to me by the project architect, I verify that the location ,
or the sitting technic�ues of the proposcd buiiding addition or the location of the parking lots wilt not
impede any of the preserved trees. All of the preserved trees{over six inches in diameter)are well outside
the coz�struction limits of this project. �
Please let me know if yo�� have any questions.
Very Truiy Yours, ---- i
AItS En i. riitg & Forestry, LLC. � CERTIFIED '
��� '
� ��- .� ;� �
� �- I.� � � ;
� . � �„ ;
,�� — ,,,,. � �,
% �� ..� �; �
� �� �i �
� --- �;
� -�,'f.' � r'� I
,-�`� _._._.-----------—�_ ;� ��. -..
_ r- �rr,:M
-r`=-"""" ar���.i�■
ARBORIST
Kandy Killen - ______------ ;
Certified Arborist#PN-5948A, I2ANllY KII.I,F,N
ftiR"fIF'IC.�I'E NU�IRER YN39aeA
Certified Tree Risk Assessor#198 �1XPIRATION�ATA 3L31R008
CC: Keith Jehnlce, Principai, AKS Engineenng&Forestry, LLC ,
Timothy Ayersman, Soderstrom Architects, PC
i
1298>SW Cirant Street,7'igard[lregon
Created by Rand��Kilien ',
Cert�tie<i��rborisi PT�-594$A Page 1 of 2
f�rborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists wlio use their education,knowledge, training, azid experience to examine
trees,recommend measures to enha�ice the health of trees, a�ld attempt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist,
or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the stnictural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fi�lly understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists ca�inot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments,like medicine,cannot be
guaranteed.
Trees can be managed,but they ca�inot be controlled. To iive near trees is to accept some degree of risk.
The only way to eliminate al] risk associated witl�trees is to eliminate all trees.
I
i
�
i:
(
i
;
;
;
;
I
i
,
i
I
;
�
1
,
�
129R5 SW(:irant Street,"1'igard Oregon
,
(`rcated by R�ndy Killcn
Ccrtiticd Arborisl PN-�948A Page 2 of 2
. •
�+.
� *� * ' *�* �
DISPOSAL COMPANY
P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140
Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-b179
January 22, 2008
TIMOTHY AYERSMAN
Associate, LEEDTM AP
SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS, P.C.
1200 NW Naito Parkway, Suite 410
Portland, Oregon 97209
RE: Broadway Rose Theatre 12850 SW Grant, Tigard, OR
We have reviewed the site plans for the Broadway Rose Theatre site on SW Grant in Tigard, and
will be able to service this location. The enclosure on the site plan is shown as 18'6" wide (inside
dimensions) and 9' deep.
I discussed with Tim Ayersman, the possibility that the customer may choose to haul their own
recycling, or share containers with CF Tigard Elementary School at the same location. This
enclosure allows room for a garbage container and a recycling container, serviced by front-load
equipment.
The requirements for the enclosure include the following stipulations:
❖ The gates should be hinged on front of the enclosure walls to allow for the full width of
18'6"needed to access the enclosure. This will also allow for the opening angle required of
120 degrees. (No center post).
❖ The enclosure also needs cane bolts and holes put in place for the gates to be locked in the
open and closed position's allowing for the opening angle needed. This is also a safety
feature that protects from personal, equipment and vehicle damage by gates swinging in the
wind.
❖ The sidewalk in front of the enclosure can not have a raised curb of any type. Trucks will be
accessing the enclosure by driving right up to the entrance.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Julia Smiley
Pride Disposal
503-625-6177*170
Julia@pridedisposal.com
Family Owned and Operated
Since 1986
� �� � � � ��� � �: ��`� 50369'�9'���'_ ROEERT GRAV PART'JERS PAGE 01
� 1 1
` II ' � �
� � � � �
���
February 27, 2008
Todd Prager - Arboris�
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall
Tigard, Oregon
RE: Broadway Rose
Dear Todd:
�
I We are the general contractor for the Broadway Rose Remodel. We wer� told
I that the �rees were to be protec.ted prior to permit— we foolishly put up orange
plastic fencing. I now see you are requiring 4° wire fence. 1001.4 can be saved,
10018 has plasUc fence around it, 10�19, 10020, and 10021 also have plastic
fence. We will reuse some and repiace with woven wire. Why we are pro�ecting
10001 and 1Q000 is beyond me. We will not even be in the street separating our
projec.t from these trees.
The cost of this fencing is about $2500. The job is totally remodel until the
parking goes in. The existing parking is more than enough staging. Would it be
possible fior us ta pay �4000 Co the city and forgo this extreme fenc�ng. Of course
� we would like o�r money returned when the project is complete and all are
' undamaged.
� Very truly� rs,
,
� ,
� i
, �,,
i
� �
; Bob Gray
I PS: To give you some id how much I love tr�ees, � flew to Everett Washingto�
to save the two Big Firs n the GTE Parking lot off Burmingham.
��
! P.O.6ox 1000 � Sherwood,OR 97i40 � Ph:(503)6gZ-q�G7, � FAX:(503}692-9292 � www.rgpi.net � CCB#65424
3/7/2008
. CITY OF TIGARD 5:07:OOPM
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
' � ` "I�igard,OR 97223 (503)639-�1171
Conditions Associated With Case#: CUP2007-00002
Project Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO
CURRENT STATUS UPDATED
# DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE BY DATE BY
1 REVISED STfE PLAN - FY SB GRANT M 2!29;'2008 CAC 3i7-2008 CAC
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for review and approval showing the front
yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for review and approval that shows the
;�, following prior to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
' B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer running along the northern property,except where the existing parking area prohibits installation.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
3 VERIFICATION OF APP FOR TRASH ENC M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the
location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements.
4 SHOW 4 ACCESSIBLE PKG SP ON PLAN M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
4. Prior to issuance of site permits,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing four accessible parking spaces as
required by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code.
5 SUBM(T CONST DRAW-TREE ISSUES M 3/7/2008 CAC 3/7/2008 CAC
5. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning and Engineering that
include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will
be retained.
B.A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles,machinery,grading,dumping,storage,burial of debris,or any other
construction-related activities in any tree protection zone;and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this
report.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title,any party found to be in violation of this chapter[18.790]pursuant to
Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to$500 and shall be required to remedy
any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include,but not be limited to,the following: 1)Replacement of
unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060(D)of the Tigard Development Code;and 2)
Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree,as
determined using the most current International Sociery of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal.
6 ESTABLISH TPZ/INSPECTION N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
6. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees
to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring
the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately.
7 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the
City Arborist,at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation through the building construction phases.The reports shall evaluate the condition
and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree
Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals,and if it
appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop
work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any
Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection
Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing
environment.
Ping-CaseConditions.rpt Page ] of 3
�' I CURRENT I STATUS UPDATED
# DESCRIPTION � ' ' STATUS* DATE BY llA"fE BY
8 RESTRICTIONS FOR WORK WITHIN TPZ N CAC 1/28i2008 MSB
' 8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone,the project arborist shall prepare a proposal detailing the
construction techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Arborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protection zone. The City Arborist may require changes
prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a
summary report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significantly impact the health and/or stability
of the trees.
9 BLDG PERMIT SITE PLAN REQ M 3/7/2008 CAC 3/7/2008 CAC
9. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant(developer or builder)shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that were preserved,the location of tree protection
fencing.
B. Submit a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist regarding building and infrastructure siting
techniques to be employed in construction with respect to any protected trees on site.
" 10 ACCESS DRIVE VISION CLEARANCE M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
10. Prior to issuance of site permits,the applicant must submit a site plan showing how the vision clearance standards will be
met for both access drives.
1 1 PFI IS REQUIRED M 2/25/2008 KSM 2/25/2008 KSM
1 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover street
improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be
submitted for review to the Engineering Deparhnent.NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the
Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's
web page(www.tigard-or.gov).
12 LEGAL NAME OF PERMITTEE ON PFI M 2/25/2008 KSM 2/25/2008 KSM
12. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entiry who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within
which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information
to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
13 PRNATE WATER QUALITY FAC[LITY M 2/27/2008 KSM 2/27/2008 KSM
13. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private water quality facility shall be submitted to the Engineering
Deparnnent(Kim McMillan)as a part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans. lncluded with the plans shall be
a proposed landscape plan and maintenance plan.
14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN M 3/6/2008 AED 3/6/2008 AED
14. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit drawings. The plan
shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition."
15 1200-C GENERAL PERMIT REQ M 3/4/2008 KSM 3/3/2008 LAF
15. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the
Federal Clean Water Act.
16 ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
16. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall submit plans that indicate the location of all rooftop equipment and
the gas meter.
17 ILLUMINATION PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
17. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit for review and approval a revised site plan showing
the areas illuminated by the proposed and existing lighting.
18 OBTAIN SIGN PERMITS N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
18. Prior to placement of any signs on site,the applicant shall apply for a sign permit and supply staff with the appropriate
plans to verify compliance with TDC Chapter 18.780.
19 DEED RESTRICTION FOR TREES N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
19. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater
than 6 inches diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed
restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die
or be removed as a hazardous tree.
PI ng-CaseConditi ons.rpt
Page 2 of 3
Updat d/CpOgditions
/
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
review and approval showing the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
��Iet, see sheet _�I.l)l)_�.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for
review and approval that shows the following pnor to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
1'his can be deferred until prior to mechanical�electrical.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
�1et.
C. The proposed buffer running along the northern property, except where the
existtng parking area prohibits installation.
�1et.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
Can be deferred until prior to mechanical.
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise
waste hauler uldicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their
requirements.
:�Ict.
4. Prior to issuance of site permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan
showing four accessible parking spaces as required by the 2004 Oregon Structural
Specialry Code.
�Iet.
S. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Planning and Engineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees
and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles,machinery,grading, dumping,
storage, burial of debris, or any other construcrion-related acriviries in any
tree protection zone;and
C. A note stating that only those trees idenrified on the approved Tree Removal
plan are authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other
�rovision of this title, any parry found to be in violarion of this chapter
18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be
subject to a civil penalty of up to �500 and shall be reqwred to remedy any
damage caused by- the violation. Such remediarion shaIl include, but not be
limited to, the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged
trees in accordance with Secrion 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development
Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalry representing the
estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined
using the most current Internarional Sociery of�rboriculture's Guide for
Plant Appraisal.
Met, see Arborist Tree Plan.
i
6. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by
the pro�ect arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall call for an
inspecnon and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the
tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately.
Must be installed and ins�ected �rior to issuance of liuilding 1'ermit. Call"I'odd for an
inspecuon once Randv Itillen has appro�-ed it Todd can be reached at (503) 718-2?00.
7. The a�plicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project
Arborist has submitted written reports to the City r�rborist, at least once every two -
weeks, as the Project rlrborist morutors the construcrion acriviries from initial tree
protecrion zone ('I'PZ) fencing installarion through the building construction phases.
The reports shall evaluate the condirion and locarion of the tree protecrion fencin�,
determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ, and if any part of the Tree Protecnon
Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protecnon Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the Ciry can stop work on the
project until an inspecrion can be done bv the Ciry Arborist and the Project Arborist.
Prior to issuance of anv Ceruficates of Occupancv, the Project r�rborist will submit a
final certification indicating the elements of tl�e Tree Protection Plan were followed
and that all remairung trees on the site are healthy, stable, and ciable in their
modified growing environment.
C�n-going.
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist
shall prepare a proposal detailing the construction techniques to be employed and
the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
City r�rborist before proposed work can proceed within a tree protecnon zone. The
City Arborist may require changes prior to approval. The project arborist shall be on
site while work is occurring within the tree protection zone and submit a summary
report certifving that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significandy
impact the health and/or stabilit�of the trees.
On-going.
9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were �reserved, the location of tree protection fencing.
B. Subrrut a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist
regarding building and inErastructure siung techniques to be employed in
constructton with respect to any protected trees on site.
:�1et, see _�rborist"I�ree Plan.
10. Prior to issuance of site permits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
Met. See Sheet ��1.UU��.
Todd Prager
From: Todd Prager
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 2:28 PM
To: 'tima@sdra.com'; 'randy@aks-eng.com'; Cheryl Caines
Subject: Broadway Rose Tree Plan
Dear Mr.Ayersman,
I reviewed the revised plans that you submitted to Cheryl Caines on 2/28/08 for the Broadway Rose Project(CUP 2007-
00002). The tree preservation plan is in need of the following revisions:
1. The grading shown on the tree preservation plan needs to match the grading shown on the revised grading plan
(sheet C1.1). Specifically,the changes made to the grading for the water quality detention pond need to be reflected in
the tree preservation plan. This is important because the tree preservation plan supersedes all other plans with respect
to the preservation of existing trees.
2. Protection for existing street trees is required, and needs to be shown on the plans. There are two street trees
requiring protection on both sides of the parking lot entrance between the curb and sidewalk. Please show the location
of street tree protection fencing on the tree preservation plan. This is required by condition 5A of this project.
3. Please include a note on the tree preservation plan that explains the penalties for illegal tree removal. The language
required can be found in condition 5C(cut and pasted below).
Condition SC "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any party found to be in violation of this chapter
[18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to$500 and shall
be required to remedy any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include, but not be limited to, the
following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060(D) of the
Tigard Development Code;and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any
unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's
Guide for Plant Appraisal."
I need the tree plan to be revised so that we can sign off on the planning conditions associated with tree protection. If
you have any questions I can meet with you and/or Randy to clarify the required changes.
Sincerely,
Todd Prager
City of Tigard
City Arborist
503 718-2700
1
MEMORANDUM
�������
SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS , P. C.
architecture I planning I exterior restoration I interior design
% 8 Z008
rf r1pO '��F- ���7W�!)
DATE OL/LOIOO . � ,,�,F��If.�•� �r�a�.. '
-- - � �'"n_
Cheryl Caines,
_ To Planning Department
FROM Tim Ayersman � �_r.,-���,�'. � E�
- PROIECT � No. 07001/Broadway Rose Theatre Company
F I L E N U M B E R M:\07001\Doc\CUP4.doc
DISTRIBUTION file �
s�e,ecT Conditional Use Permit (2007-00002)
REMARKS
• Response Sheet
• Sheet A1.00A
y' ��• Arborist Tree Preservation Plan
� • Sheet C1.01
� • Sheet C1.02
,' • Sheet C2.01
� • Sheet C3.01
�`t„rye ��'!C �'-�W4'�Nn ��'` � �,,,..�C� q '"�� �.^ �'�`Q /:v.t� �j�.��f y ���,� �;��c;�-c�I�
. J
�� S� 1 i �,� ������,,r�,����1�� ���( s��,ss�� �.�! o� p/J�s
rr� �o��J � `�,�l� c �1ru n on �
-��--j� J� �( 1 �
_. ���—._ r o�„i�ti�' _� 3 �`�°T 'h'«� C �a on '�� 1�0�'�� i So..�'� S�o�t o�'��
� C�,S`7�
P��C. �o� �,��-��J � �Y�d �j �R
� c-���'���� 5C
c�� �.. � po ,���.-�.� �
` ���
,, �.1� . � ��� ��s.�� ,� rl�..
1200 NW Naito Parkway,Suite 410 I Portland,Oregon 972D9 I 503.228.5617 I ve■ 503.273.8584 I www.sdra.com
Updat�c�20qog itions
/ /
Responses 02/26/08
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for
review and approval showing the front yard setback from Grant Avenue.
The setback shown is from the curb. No plans show the right-of-way line, which appears to
- be about 20 feet from the curb.
RESPONSE: Sheet A 1.00A has been revised.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for
review and approval that shows the followulg pnor to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
This can be deferred until pnor to mechanical/electrical.
RESPONSE: Deferred until prior to mechanical/ electrical permit.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
Met.
RESPONSE: This requirement has been met.
C. The proposed buffer mnning along the northern property, except where the
existtng parking area prohibits installation.
Met.
RESPONSE: This requirement has been met.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
Can be deferred until prior to mechanical.
RESPONSE: Deferred until prior to mechanical permit.
3. Prior to site pernut issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise
waste hauler indicating that the locarion of the proposed trash enclosure meets their
requirements.
Met.
RESPONSE: This requirement has been met.
4. Prior to issuance of site permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site lan
showing four accessible parking spaces as required by the 2004 Oregon �tructural
Specialty Code.
Met.
I�.SPUNS�: This requirement has been met.
5. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to
both Planning and Engineering that include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees
and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles, machinery,grading, dutnping,
storage,burial of debris, or any other construction-related activities in any
tree protection zone;and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal
plan are authorized for removal by this report. Notwithstanding any other
� �rovision of this ride, any party found to be in violarion of this chapter
18.790] pursuant to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be
subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 and shall be required to remedy any
damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include,but not be
• limited to, the following: 1) Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged
trees in accordance with Secrion 18.790.060 (D) of the Tigard Development
Code; and 2) Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the
estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as determined
using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for
Plant Appraisal.
See Todd's Comments regarding tree protecrion. These As was discussed at the public
hearing, the fencing is being required not just for construction activity,but also for trucks
enterin� the site and matenal storage. Thcsc comments were�iven pnor to the
detcrnvnation of thc removal of trees 10022/10023. I've copied Todd's notes below:
Per Condition 5, the construction drawings need to show protection for the trees to be
retained (trees 10000-10017 and 10019-10023). Protection is also required for street
trees that are to remain. Chain link fencing is required for those trees that are in close
proximity to construction activities (trees 10005-10017 and 10019-10023). The
remaining site trees (10000-10004) and street trees can be protected with orange
construction fence. The dimensions of the tree protection zone need to be per the project
arborist's recommendations from 8-2-07 and drawn to scale on the plans (grading plan).
The plans (grading plan) also need to include the tree preservation notes from the project
arborist's 8-2-07 plan as well as the additional preservation notes in Conditions 5 and 8.
Finally, the tree preservation plan needs to include a signature of approval from the
project arborist.
RESPONSE: The arborist ttee plan has been revised.
6. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by
the pro�ect arborist to protect the trees to be retained.The applicant shall call for an
inspectton and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring the
tree protecrion to verify that the tree protection measures are perfortning adequately.
Must be installed and inspected prior to issuance �f Builciing Perirut. Call Todd for an
inspecrion once Randy Killen has approved it. Todd can be reached at (503) 718-2700.
RESPONSE: Fencing will be installed per the arborist tree protection plan. Randy will
review and will call Todd once he has approved it.
7. The a�plicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project
Arbonst has submitted written reports to the City Arborist, at least once every two
weeks, as the Pro ect Arborist morutors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone (�I`PZ) fencing installation through the building construction phases.
`T'he reports shall evaluate the condition and locarion of the tree protection fencmg,
determme if any changes occurred to the TT'Z, and if any part of the Tree Protecnon
Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protecrion Plan are not
being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, thc City can stop work on the
project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist.
Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, the Project Arborist will submit a
final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed
• and that all remain.ing trees on the site are healthy, stable,and viable in their
modified growing environment.
- On going.
RESPONSE: The arborist will submit a written report at least once every two week.
8. If work is required within an established tree protection zone, the project arborist
shall prepare a proposal detailing the construcnon techniques to be cmploycd and
the likely impacts to the trees. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Arborist before proposed woxk can proceed within a tree protecuon zone. The
City Arborist may reqwre changes prior to approval.The project arborist shall be on
site while work is occurring within the tree protecrion zone and submit a suminary
report certifying that the work occurred per the proposal and will not significandy
impact the health and/or stability of the trees.
Grading is proposed within the tree protecrion area of#10014 to construct the water quality
swale. Has this been considered by the arborist?
RESPONSE: The arborist tree plan has been revised.
9. Prior to issuance of building pertnits, the applicant (developer or builder) shall:
A. Submit site plan drawings showing the accurate location of the trees that
were�reserved, the locat�on of tree protection fencing.
B. Submit a statement and signature of approval from a certified arborist
regarding building and inftastructure sittng techniques to be employed in
construct�on with respect to any protected trees on site.
Same as above.
RESPONSE: The arborist tree plan has been revised as well as his letter.
10. Prior to issuance of site perniits, the applicant must submit a site plan showing how
the vision clearance standards will be met for both access drives.
Met. See Sheet A 1.00A.
RESPONSE: This requirement has been met.
� e
�
� ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
FORESTRY SURVEYING
13910 S.W, Galbreath Dr., Suite 100 � Offices Located In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON
Phone: (503)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY �DMOND, OREGON
Fax: (503)925-8969 VANCOWER,WASHINGTON
www.aks-en .com
Date: February 28,2008
To: Cheryl Caines
Assistant Planner
. City of Tigard
Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
' Tigard, OR 97223
Re:Revised Tree Letter for 12985 SR'Grant Street,Tigard Oregon
MS. Caines,
This letter is to satisfy section 12, subsection B of the conditions of approval for the construction project located at
12985 SW Crrant Street,Tigard Oregon. During the planning process,I reviewed the preliminary site plans
provide to me by the project's architect and made recommendation for tree removal and protection for the site
development located at 12985 SW Grant Street. T'he project's architect has since provided me with the civil
grading plan for the subject property. In reviewing the construction plans,I found that Tree# 10014 which was
originally slated to be preserved will need to be removed due to the current design of the storm pond. The
architect is attempting to have the storm pond redesign in order to preserve Tree# 10014. If tree# 10014 can not
be preserved, then it will be removed and treated as an illegal tree removal to include all fines associated with such
a removal. Also, I have revised the tree preservation plan to show the addition of chain link tree protection fencing
for the following trees: Tree# 10414, 10019, 10020, 10021 (assuming that Tree# 10014 can be preserved). Per a
telephone conservation,I had with Todd Prager; the City of Tigard Arborist, on February 26,2008, only these trees
will required to have the ti-ee protection fencing be chain link. The location of the building and the associated
improvements will only impede Tree# 10014 and all attempts are being made to redesign the storm pond in order
preserve this tree. The remaining trees shown to be preserved on the Tree Preservation Plan dated February 28,
2008,will not be impended due to the.construction of this project.
Please let me lrnow if you have any questions.
CERTIFIED
���
.�- ,� �
� � �
Very Truly Yours, � i ' � I �
AKSEn ii. & Forestry,LLC. �""` `� -��
� � �
� , , _ ....�—.
� ��v,�.
� �i� v�
����iil
�� ' �—i
Randy KiIk � ARBORIST i
Certified Arborist#PN-5948A, R4NDY KILLEN
CERTIFICATE NUMBER PN-5949A
Certifiecl Tree Risk Assessor#198 EXPIRATIONUATE: 12/31/2008
CC: Keith Jehnke,Principal,AKS Engineering&Forestry,LLC
Timothy Ayersman, Soderstrom Architects,PC
12985 SW Grant Street,Tigard Oregon
Created by Randy Killen
Certified Arborist PN-594SA Page 1 of 2
:
� , Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge,training, and experience to examine
trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist,
or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatrnents, like medicine, cannot be
guaranteed.
• Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk.
The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
12985 SW Grant Street,Tigard Oregon
Created by Randy Killen
Certified Arborist PN-5948A Page 2 of 2
i"I i��?OU$
d CiTY OF TIGARD y:;,:3;,�;�
13125 SW Hall Bl�d. ,
' � I'igard,OR 97223 (S03)639-4171
Conditions Associated With Case #: CUP2007-00002
Project Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO
CU[ZRENT I STATUS I UPDATED
# DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE BY DATE BY
I KI:VISI�:D ST�IE PLAN - I�Y SB GRAN�[� M 2129-'2008 CAC 3i7i2008 CAC
1. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for review and approval showing the front
yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN N CAC 1/28/2008 MSB
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for review and approval that shows the
following prior to site permit issuance.
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer running along the northern property,except where the existing parking area prohibits installation.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
3 VERIFICAT[ON OF APP FOR TRASH ENC M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the
location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements.
4 SHOW 4 ACCESSIBLE PKG SP ON PLAN M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
4. Prior to issuance of site permits,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing four accessible parking spaces as
required by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialry Code.
5 SUBMIT CONST DRAW-TREE ISSUES M 3/7/2008 CAC 3/7/2008 CAC
5. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning and Engineering that
include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will
be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment,vehicles, machinery,grading,dumping,storage, burial of debris,or any other
construction-related activities in any tree protection zone; and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this
report.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title,any party found to be in violation of this chapter[18.790] pursuant to
Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to$500 and shall be required to remedy
any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include,but not be limited to,the following: 1) Replacement of
unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060(D)of the Tigard Development Code;and 2)
Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree, as
determined using the most current International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal.
6 ESTABLISH TPZ/1NSPECTION M 3/13/2008 CAC 3/13/2008 CAC
6. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees
to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the Ciry Arborist for the purpose of monitoring
the tree protcction to verify that the tree protection measures are perfonning adequately.
7 BI-WKLY ARBOR[ST REPORTS N CAC U28/2008 MSB
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibiliry to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the
City Arborist,at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone(TPZ)fencing installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition
and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree
Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the City Arborist at the scheduled intervals,and if it
appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop
work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any
Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection
Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable, and viable in their modified growing
en v i ronment.
NI ng-CaseCond i tions.rpt
Page 1 of 3
Cheryl Caines
From: Todd Prager
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:31 AM
To: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: #11872 Broadway Rose Initial Arborist Compliance Letter
Hi Cheryl,
I inspected the Broadway Rose tree protection and everything looked good.
-Todd
From: Cheryl Caines
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:47 AM
To: 'Randy Killen'
Cc: Todd Prager
Subject: RE: #11872 Broadway Rose Initial Arborist Compliance Letter
Randy,
The arborist reports should be directed to Maris Buxton.
Cheryl
From: Randy Killen [mailto:randy@aks-eng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:12 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Cc: Todd Prager; Tim Ayersman; Keith Jehnke; etools
Subject: #11872 Broadway Rose Initial Arborist Compliance Letter
Ms. Caines,
Attached is the letter to verify that the tree protection fence is correctly installed for the Broadway Rose project.
I would also like to know if you would like the bi-weekly arborist reports for this project be sent to you or to Ms. Buxton.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
Randy Killen
CPESC,CESCL, Arborist,Certified Tree Risk Assessor
AKS Engineering 8 Forestry,
LLC.
Sherwood Oregon Vancouver Washington Redmond Oregon
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 100 12011 NE 99th Street,Suite 1530 1810 S First Street,Suite K
Sherwood,OR 97140 Vancouver,WA 98682 Redmond,OR 97756
Phone:(503)925-8799 Phone:(360)882-0419 Phone:(541)526-6975
Fax:(503)925-8969 Fax:(360)882-0426 Fax:(541)526-6974
DisGaimer:AKS Engineering and Forestry,LLC shall not be liable for any changes made to the electronic data transferred.
Distribution of electronic data to others is prohibited without the express written consent of AKS Engineering and Forestry LLC.
1
E�iGINEERING PLA�tNI�1G LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTC�R�,
FORESTRY SURVEYING
I39I0 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 , Offices Located In:
Sherwaod,Oregon 97140 SH�RWOOD,OREGON
� Phone:(503}925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORESTRY �DMOND,OR.EGON �
Fax: (503)925-8969 VAI�'COUVER,WASHINGTON
www.aks-eng.com
iVlarch 12,2008
Cberyl Caines
Assistant Planner
: City of Tigard
Planning Division
13125 SW HaII Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Ph�ne: 503-b39-417I
Fax: 503-684-7297
RE: Initial Compliance Arborist Report for Broadway Rose (AKS Job # 1872).
Dear Ms. Caines:
The pur�ose of tl�is letter is to verify that the tree pratection fenciiag is iz�stallcd per the approved Tree
Preservation Plan for the Broadway Rose Praject located at 12985 SW Grant Avenue, Tigard, Oregon.
On Marcl� 12, 200$, I visited tize site and found tl�e tree protectian fencii3g to be installed in tlze correct
location and constnicted of the correct inaterial, as depictcd in the approved Tree Preservat.ion Plan
dated Marcll5, 2008.
Please iet me know if you have any questions,
�-------
Veiy TruIy Yours, CE�1ED �
AKS Engineering c� 1%orestry, LLC. ��`��
:� .�;
_..�' ��, �' ---�:
='7 � w ,--..�
I� �
,: ��, �
i� � ' ---'��
i f..
r
� .--�- � .��ir.�i
. y, .. - ' ��rr������ �
`� �� �.� ` - — �
�''" � ,;v�' y . ARBORIST
.i� RAVDY KILLEN
G� . CF.R9'I1�ICATIS YUNBER PN-59dSA
Ra17C�yK111B11 sxr�xnaio�unrc: unir?uos
Certifed Arborist PN-5948A
Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198
CC: Todd Prager—City of Tigard (City Arborist)
Keitl�1ellrilce,Principal,AKS Engineering&Forestry,LLC
' Timothy Ayersnzan, Soderstrozaa A.rchitects, PC
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use t}�eir education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine
trees, recomrnend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living iaear
trees. 'The Client a�1d Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the
arborist, or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the struetural failure of a tree. Trees
are tiving organisms that fail in ways we do noT fW1y undersla��d. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arl�orists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under ail
circuinstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like inedicine, cannot
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
;
CITY OF TIGARD �i�9i2oog
-r 8:55:2=4AM
� 13125 S��'Hall Bhd.
Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 •
Conditions Associated With Case #: CUP2007-00002
Project Name: BROADWAY ROSE THEATRE CO
CURRENT STATUS UPDATED
# DESCRIPTION STATUS* DATE BY I DATE BY
I REVfSED SI�IE PLAN -FY SB GRANT M ?�?9/20U8 CAC 3!712008 CAC
I. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide a revised site plan for review and approval showing the front
yard setback from Grant Avenue.
2 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN M 9/19/2008 CAC 9/19/2008 CAC
2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape/site plan to the Planning Division for review and approval that shows the
� following prior to site permit issuance.
•
A. The size and species of proposed landscape trees and shrubs.
� B. Parking lot trees at a ratio of at least 1 tree for every 7 proposed parking spaces.
C. The proposed buffer running along the northern property, except where the existing parking area prohibits installation.
D. Location of and screening for the proposed gas meter.
3 VERIFICATION OF APP FOR TRASH ENC M 2/?0/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
3. Prior to site permit issuance the applicant shall submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the
location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their requirements.
4 SHOW 4 ACCESSIBLE PKG SP ON PLAN M 2/20/2008 CAC 2/20/2008 CAC
4. Prior to issuance of site permits,the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing four accessible parking spaces as
required by the 2004 Oregon Structural Specialty Code.
5 SUBMIT CONST DRAW-TREE ISSUES M 3/7/2008 CAC 3/7/2008 CAC
5. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall submit construction drawings to both Planning and Engineering that
include:
A. Protection measures for all trees to be retained on-site including street trees and trees 10022/10023 if these two trees will
be retained.
B. A note prohibiting equipment, vehicles, machinery,grading,dumping,storage,burial of debris,or any other
construction-related activities in any tree protection zone;and
C. A note stating that only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this
report.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title,any party found to be in violation of this chapter[18.790]pursuant to
Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to$500 and shall be required to remedy
any damage caused by the violation. Such remediation shall include,but not be limited to,the following: 1) Replacement of
unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060(D)of the Tigard Development Code; and 2)
Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed or damaged tree,as
� determined using the most cunent International Society of Arboriculture's Guide for Plant Appraisal.
6 ESTABLISH TPZ/[NSPECTION M 3/13/2008 CAC 3/13/2008 CAC
, 6. Prior to commencing site work,the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees
to be retained. The applicant shall call for an inspection and allow access by the City Arborist for the purpose of monitoring
the tree protection to verify that the tree protection rneasures are performin��acleyuately.
7 BI-WKLY ARBORIST REPORTS N CAC I/28/2008 MSB
7. The applicant shall have an on-going responsibility to ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the
City Arborist,at least once every two weeks,as the Project Arborist monitors the construction activities from initial tree
protection zone(TPZ)fencin�installation through the building construction phases. The reports shall evaluate the condition
and location of the tree protection fencing,determine if any changes occurred to the TPZ,and if any part of the Tree
Protection Plan has been violated. If the reports are not submitted to the Ciry Arborist at the scheduled intervals,and if it
appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor,the City can stop
work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Arborist and the Project Arborist. Prior to issuance of any
Certificates of Occupancy,the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection
Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,stable,and viable in their modified growing
environment.
Pi n g-CaseCon d i tions.tpt
Page 1 of 3
TRANSMITTAL
� •
. Ij�� e _ !` �
�, ._
' P �$ �oo$ �
SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS , P. C.
architecture I planning I exterior rastoration I interior design �', �` .� � ��•!�
t�
OATE � ^ 1g� �
To cH,�}�c c�;,ve5
FROM � ��i�GVI�[�
�ti��. �(L��
• PROIECT / NO.o7��I �L\Y �/�'
%�� �%V��
FILE NUMBER
MErHOO ❑MAIL ❑OVERNIGHT ❑90 MIN ❑3 HOUR ❑FAX
❑
TRANSMITTED ❑DOCUMENTS ❑SPECS ❑SUBMITTAL �RAWINGS
❑SAMPLES ❑DISKS ❑
ACTI ON ❑APPROVAL �OR YOUR USE ❑REVIEW ANO COMMENT
DISTRIBUiION
REMARKS
NO. OF COPIES OATE NO. DESCRIPTION
3 t�" rv�'r��oN
,
1200 NW Naito Parkway,Suite 410 I Portland,Oregon 97209 I 503.228.5617 I FA% 503.273.8584 I wwwsdra.com
�
�� ��
'
,
�
o �� S
� or
ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
FORESTRY SURVEYING
I3910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite ]00 � Offices Located In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON
Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,OREGON
Fax:(543)925-89b9 ENGINEERING&FORES7'RY VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON
www.aks-eng.com
July 25, 2008
Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator
; City of Tigard,Oregon
i 13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone: 503-639-4171
F'ax: 503-684-7297
RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Broadway Rose (AKS Job # 1872); Tigard File
lvo: CUP2007-00002.
Dear Maris Buxton:
As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Repart letter is to affirm that the
construction activities for:
Broadwav Rose
is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Pla�i. On July 24,2008,the site was
visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of
construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone{TPZ):
Coinpliance Violation
1- Location of tree pratection fence X
2- Condition of txee pratection fence is adequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy and unhanned X
4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X
5- Roots(>1")within excavation aze pruned X
- 6- No compaction within the TPZ X
7- No fill within the TPZ X
To this date, all constructian activities of Robert Gray Construction comply w'tth the approved Tree
Protection and Removal Plan. I informed the contractor that the tree protection for the two small street
trees located at the entrance(Trees are less than 4 inches in diameter)was in place hut needed to be
reattach to fence posting. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable.
Please let rr►e know if you have any questions,
CERTIFIED
Very Truly Yours, i�,��
AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. I= '��
. —,.
� .� ` -- �
� �
; ...� �
�r y __ .�.r=�••.
a ' i�v.w
� ��� v ■
i�i�ii
Randy Killen ARBORIST
Certified Arborist PN-5948A ��FlDYN�LL��R�
Cerrified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 EXPIRATIOM DATf: I2niB04!
Arborist Disclosure Statement
, Arborists are tree specialzsts who use their education,knowledge,training, and experience to examine
; tre�;s, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the
arborist, or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances,or for a specified period af tinte. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot
be guara��teed.
Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate ali risk associated witii trees is to eliminate all trees.
+
,•
- EtiGINEERI:�G PLA:'tih'ING LA1�iD5CAPE ARCHITECTL'RE
FORESTRY SLR VEYIN G
13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr., Suite 100 � O�ces Located In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97340 SHERWOOD,OREGON
Phone:(503)925-8799 ENGINEERINC�k FORE,STRY REDMOND,OREGON
Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOLiVER,WASHINGTON
� www.aks-ene.com
August 13, 2008
Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator
City of Tigard, Oregon
13125 S W I-�all Blvd.
' Tigard, OR 97223
' Phone: 503-639-4171
Pax: 503-684-7297
RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Broadway Rose(AKS Job# 1872); Tigard File
No: CUP2d07-00002.
Dear Maris Buxton:
' As a Condition of Approvai, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the
construction activities for:
' Broadwav Rose
is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On August 13, 2008,the site
' was��isited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of
construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ):
Compliance Violation
1- Location of tree protection fence X
2- Conditian of tree protection fence is aciequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X
4- No clumping of material withi» the TPZ X
5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X
6- No compaction within the TPZ X
7- No fill within the TPZ X
To this date, all construction activities of Robert Gray Construction comply with the approved Tree
Protection and Removal Plan.All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable.
- Please let me know ifyou have any questions,
�----------
Very Truly Yours, i CE� ED
AKS ineering& Forestry,LLC. �"-� ;,�; '�,,�
`,� ' --
�-r � (. f -�
,��' ..•� --.�
; / � �
f-- ��. �
; � �, .:.._-�.
f.-� �.. � � 11�/��
. � ''� � J\ ��
�Ur�.� �
��1�/a ■
ARBORIST
Randy �llen -
Certifi d Arborist PN-5948A RANDY KILI.EN
C6RTIFICATF,t`'UMDER P.N-5?�8A
' Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 eXfIMTION UATE: ILII/?Wi
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their educaiion,knowledge, training, and experience to examine
, trees, recommend measures to enl�ance the health of trees, and atternpt to reduce the risk of livuig near
trees. The Client and Jurisdic�ion may choose to accept or disregard the recomrrzendations of the
arborist, or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fail in �vays we do not fu11y understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot giiarantee that a tree will be 1lealthy or safe under all
' circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trccs is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
�
� Y �
ENGINEERING PLANiVING LAI�TDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
FORESTRY SURVEYING
13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 � Offices Located in:
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON
� Phone:(SU3)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FoRESTRY �DMOND,OREGON
Fax: (503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGT�N
www.aks-enQ.com
�
August 29,2008
Maris Buxton—Pezmit Coordinator
City of Tigard, Oregon
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
' Tigard, OR 97223
Phone: 503-639-4171
' Fax: 503-684-7297
, RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Braadway Rose(AKS Job # 1872); Tigard File
No: CUP2007-00002.
' Dear Maris Buxton:
I As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Report letter is to affirm that the
construction activities for:
' Broadwav Rose
is in compliance with the approved T'ree Protection and Removal Plan. On August 27, 2008,the site
was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a checklist of
construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone (TPZ):
Compliance Violation
1- Location of tree protection fence X
2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy and unhanned X
4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X
5- Roots(>1")within excavation are pruned X
6- No compaction within the TPZ X
7- No fill within the TPZ X
To this date, all construction activities of Robert Gray Construction comply witli the approved Tree
' Protection and Removal Plan. Atl preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stabte_
, •-
Please let me know if you have any questions,
CERTIFIED
Very Truly Yours, ���
�..- .; ��
AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC. ;�: � ' �
.,''7 • ,_--�
,
, �� � .��
; /,; _ � �� ,._:.�.w
� - --�,,-:
�- ::._..�,....
ARBORIST
Randy K' n RA1V"DY KILLEN
Certifi d Arborist PN-5948A CERTIFICATCNUMAF.R�N-5948A
Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 ��P��TION DATL: lt/111f00t
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge, training, and experience to examine
trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attennpt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the
arborist,or seek additional advice.
ArUorists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
� are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed,but they cacuiot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate aIl trees.
s
;
,
-v
ENGIrEEI2IltiG PLAI�NING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTL?RE
FORESTRY SURVEYWG
. 13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr.,Suite 100 / Offices Located In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON
Phone:(503)925-8799 ENGI.�VEERING&FORESTRY REDM�ND,OREGON
Fax:(503)925-8969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON
www.aks-en .g com
September 12, 2008
Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator
City of Tigard, Oregon
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone: 503-639-4171
Fax: 503-684-7297
RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Broadway Rose(AKS Job # 1872); Tigard �le
No: CUP2007-00002.
Dear Maris Buxton:
As a Condition of Appmval, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Report letter is to �rm that the
construction activities for:
Broadwav Rose �/"�
is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On September 11, 2008,the
site was visited for compliance witli the Tree Protectian and Removal Plan. The following is a
checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone(TPZ):
Compiiance Violation
1- Location of tree protection fence X
2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X
4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X
5- Roots (>1")within excavation are pnined X
6- No compacrian within the TPZ X
7- No fill within the TPZ X
To this date, all construction activities of Robert Gray Construction comply with the approved Tree
Protection and Removal Plan. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable.
Please let me know if you have any questions,
Very Truly Yours, tE� ED
AKS Engineering& Forestry,LLC � j�
�� � - �.
�. � / . �
i'"' ` / � w �ri
./ I�r► '. ^' �
� , w_w
/J - � ....,i►i�
, _../ L.._ .
�• �►.: �
����i�■
�, - -
ARBORfST
Randy Killen - `
Certified Arborist PN-5948A �DY KILLEN
CF.RTIFlCA'fftllllMYILR[IV-3916A
Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 G►IMTIONDATi: IY71/]DOt
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training,and experience to examine
trees,recommend measures to enhance the health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choase to accept or disxegard the recommendations of the
arbori st,or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are iiving organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances,or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments, like medicine,cannot
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
ENGINEERING PLANNING LAIVDSCAPE ARCHITECI'URE
r FORESTRY SURV EYIN G
13910 S.W.Galbreath Dr., Suite lU0 � Offices Located In:
' Shetwood,Oregon 97140 SHERWOOD,OREGON
' Phone:(503)925-8799 REDMOND,�REGON
Pax:(503)925-8969 ENGINBERING&FC�kFS"Tk�' VANCOLNER,WASHINGTON
www,aks-en$,com
September 29, 2008
Vlaris Buxton—Perznit Coordinator
City of Tigard, Oregon
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone: 503-b39-4171
Fax: 503-684-7297
RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Broadway Rose(AKS Job# 1$72); Tigard File
No: CUP2007-00002.
Dear iVlaris Buxton:
As a Condition of Approval,the following Bi-Monthly Asborist Report letter is to affirm that the
construction activities for:
Broadwav Rose
is in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. On September 29, 2008, the
site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a
checklist of construction activities that have been inspected inside the tree protection zone (TPZ):
Com�liance Violation
1- I.ocation of tree protection fence X
2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy and unharmed X
4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X
5- Roots (>1") within excavation are pruned X
6- No compaction within the TPZ X
' 7- No fill within the TPZ X
� To this date, all construction activities of Robert Gray Construction comply with the approved Tree
' Protection and Removal Plan. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be healthy and stable.
The orange tree protection fencing was down in some areas(falIen off the t-post)and the contractor re-
installed the fencing while I was there.
�.
�.
�r.: • ,
,
Please Iet me know if you have any questions,
Very Truly Yours, �E� ED
AKS E,r�gin ing& Forestry,LLC. � '��.
� � � �' — �
) �- w . _r--.i
, �� .-- .:.-,�'
� - „_.,.
-� ,. ��:►.�:
........�....
{' ndy Killen ARBORIST�
Certified orist PN-5948A ���DY���.�'R E�$A
Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 txnnwT�onnsrr: �un�z�
Arborist Disclosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education,knowledge,training, and experience to examine
trees, recommend measures to enhance the health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of Eiving near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction inay choose to accept or disregard the recommendatians of the
arborist, or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fiilly understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine, can.not
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
. .
ENGINEERING PLAl�'NING LAiVDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
FORESTRY SURVEYING
13910 S.W.Galbreat��Dr.,Suite 100 � Of#ices i.ocated In:
Sherwood,Oregon 97l40 SHERWOOD,OItEGON
Phone:(503)925-8799 ENGINEERING&FORE,STRY �DMOND,OREGON
Fax: (503)925-$969 VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON
www.aks-en�com
October 21, 2008
Maris Buxton—Permit Coordinator
City of Tigard, Oregon
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard,OR 97223
Phone: 503-639-4171
Fax: 503-684-7297
RE: Required Bi-Weekly Arborist Report for Broadway Rose(AKS Job # 1872); Tigard File
No: CUP2007-00002.
Dear Maris Buxton:
As a Condition of Approval, the following Bi-Monthly Arborist Report letter is to aff'irm that the
construction activities for:
Broadwav Rose
is not in compliance with the approved Tree Protection and Removal Plan. �n October 17,2008, the
site was visited for compliance with the Tree Protection and Removal Plan. The following is a
checklist of eonstruction activities that have been inspected inside tl�e tree protection zone (TPZ):
Campliance Violation
1- Locltion of tree protection feilce X
2- Condition of tree protection fence is adequate X
3- Preserved trees are healthy aud unharmed X
4- No dumping of material within the TPZ X
5- Roots (>1")within excavation are pruned X
' 6- No compaction within the TPZ X
7- No fill within the TPZ X
The construction activities of Robert Gray Construction did not comply with the approved Tree
Protection and Removal Plan at the time of my site visit because they had not notified AKS
Engineering and Forestry prior to entering into the Tree Protection Zone(TPZ)to install undergound
irrigation along the property line in the southeast corner of the project. I inspected the area that was
' • .
trenched and no roots greater than 1-inch were severed during the excavation and no apparent damage
occurred to the trees due to this activity. I infonned the contractor tl�at I have to be notified prior to
� entering into any TPZ. I instructed the contractor to backfill the trench and re-install the tree protection
fencing. I believe to be a minor infraction that cause littie or no damages to trees that were affected by
the installation of irrigation. All preserved trees on site have been observed to be stable.
Please let me know if you have any questions,
Very Truly Yours, �F�ED
AKS Engineering& Forestry, L� � �'�
�� . _ —�
� � — ..
,.
i-7 �',= �
' �} -_. w_�
� i�y,+�
-j��� ���- ���.�i
� yi` ; �III����i�■
`'�� � ' ARBORIST
Randy Killen �p�,�y�LLEN
' Certifieci Arborist PN-5948A CCRTIPIGTP.NUM96RPN•59�tA
Certified Tree Risk Assessor# 198 Exrix�r�oNU�re: uia�aoue
Arborist DYSClosure Statement
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine
trees, recoinmend measures to enhance the health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near
trees. The Client and Jurisdiction may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the
arborist, or seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees
are living organisms that fait in ways we do not fu11y understand. Conditions are often hidden within
trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all
circuinstances,or for a speeified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments,like medicine,cannot
be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed,but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of
risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
�
�
Washington County,Oregon 2008-092562
�. 11M3120�R03:18:24 PM
.y ` D-IRUL Cnt=1 Stn=21 RECORDSI
� 510.00 5. .i11.00-Total=$26.00
After Recording Send A Co�y To:
Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J
Attn: Rob Saxton
01306266200800925620020026
G960 SW Sandburg Street �.Richard Hobem;cht,D�rector of Assessment and i
Taxatlon and Ex-Offcio County Clerk�or Washirgton -
Tigaxd, OR 97223 County,Oregon.tlo hereby certify that the within �'�—�
instrument of writing was roceived and recorded in the Ir-�'S�' � �,
book ot records of said cou/��'�'�"�"/I(1 L{� �-*T���
Ll'^c�^M^'�X �„'W„CA�1 ��;_",//'`-'r..
File No.: CUP2007-00002 Richard Hobernicht,Director ofAssessment and �;:, ,'�
Taxation..Ex-Oflicio County Clerk ""`�
TREE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
DEED RESTRICTION
Declarant is the owner of property described in E�ibit A.
Declaxant has preserved ox retained trees over and across portions of said property in
accordance with the Broadway Rose Conditional Use Permit CUP2007-00002. Any such preserved
or retained tree may be removed only if for the reasons set out in an approved tree plan,in accordance
with Section 18.790.030,as a condition of approval for a conditional use,or if the trcc dies or is hazaxdous
according to a certified arborist. This deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid
if all trees preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as hazardous.
THIS AGREEMENT shall be deemed a Covenant running with the land and is binding
upon the owners of property described in Exhibit A and their successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Declarant has executed this agreement on that date and year
set forth below.
DECLARANT:
`�v r'�2�Ni i[�l/�l�G— � � `ri(a y�i2 p -TUbI�-n-st tv
Sc.Nvo L ��<<�r-rZ �LT 2,3�
S i'A"1'E OF OREGON, COUNTY OF��ASHING"TON
This instrumen was acknowledged before me by /)D�J � • �CP��'Y� r ��n��L��-�
� ov�t�,L 6-u_ /3 2oD�F
��� �- ��,.�-r� G , a-oo 9
NOTARY PUBLIC — OREGON Date My Commission Expires
OFFICIAL SEAL
: �,��': PATRICIA KELLER
� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO.39681B
MY COMMISSI�N EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 6,2009
A �
/ EXHIBIT A
Property Description
A tract of land in Section 2,Township a South,Range i West,of the Willamette Meridian,City of
Tigard,Washington County, Oregon,described as follows:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 4i,ANorth Tigardville Addition@,a duly recorded
plat in Book 2,Page 2�,Washington County Plat Records,thence from said Point of Beginning
along the northeasterly line of said Lot 4i S.5'7°4o'oo"E.,402.49 feet to a 5/8"iron rod with red
plastic cap inscribed AW.L.Mc. IS 808"marldng the most eastexly comer of said Lot 4i;thence
along the easterly line of Lot 4i and Lot 42,5.45°0o'3o"W.,333•92 feet to a i/i2 iron pipe to a
point marking the most northerly corner of the ASchool House@ tract as shown on said plat of
ANorth Tigardville Addition@;the along the westerly line of said ASchool House@ tract and the
easterly line of said Lot 42 and Lot 43,continuing 5.45°0o'3o"W.,302.93 feet to a 5/8'iron rod
with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L.MC. IS 808 marking the northeasterly corner of that
��
certain street dedication as described in Book 22b,Page 4�3,Washington County Deed Records;
thence along the northeasterly line of said street dedication N.So°ob'o6"W.,322.04 feet to a
5'/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L. Mc.PIS 808"marlang a point on the
southeasterly right-of-way line of S.W.Grant Avenue;thence along said southeasterly right of
way line N.39°53�54"E.,xi6.66 feet to a 5/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L. Mc.
IS 808";thence N.54°i8'2�"W.,4i2.3�feet to a 5/8 iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed
AW.M. Mc. LS 808";thence N.39°53'oo"E.,449•41 feet to a 2"iron pipe:thence S.57°4o'S6"E.,
394•55 feet to 5/8"iron rod with red plastic cap inscribed AW.L.Mc.LS 808,said point being a
point on the centeriine of S.W.Grant Avenue;thence along said centerline 5.39°53�5o"W.,6.56
feet to the Point of Beginning.
Excepting there fram all that portion of Right-of-way dedicated to the City of Tigard in
Document Numbers 2oo3i58�64 and 2oo3i58�65.
Contains 383,ioi square feet or 8.79 acres,more or less.
The basis of bearing for this description is Survey Number 29,424�Washington County Survey
Records.