Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/25/2013 •1 TIGARD City of Tigard TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING June 25, 2013 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED I:1Design & Communications\Donna\City Councillccpkt3 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard- or.gov III • City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting — Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: June 25, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign -in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503 - 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503 - 639 -4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503 - 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov C ABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. :114 4 City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting — Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: June 25, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are dosed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Council Communications & Liaison Reports E. Call to Council and Staff for Non - Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) A. Follow -up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Citizen Communication — Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 7:35 pm estimated time 1. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR: A. May 21, 2013 2. ACCEPTANCE OF THE QUAIL HOLLOW TRACT S OPEN SPACE DONATION 3. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH METRO REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FIELDS AND BROWN PROPERTIES 4. APPROVE THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY - Resolution 5. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS OF TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES - Resolution • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council / City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. RECEIVE UPDATE BY TUALATIN RIVERKEEPERS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM AT DIRKSEN NATURE PARK 7:40 pm estimated time 5. RECEIVE PROFESSIONAL ACHIEVEMENT IN PLANNING AWARD FOR URBAN FORESTRY CODE REVISIONS PROJECT 7:55 pm estimated time 6. AMEND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE SOCIAL GAMING 8:00 pm estimated time 7. DISCUSSION ON DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS TO SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN STEERING COMMI1 TEE 8:20 pm estimated time 8. DISCUSSION ON RIVER TERRACE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT 8:50 pm estimated time 9. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD 9:20 pm estimated time AWARD RIVER TERRACE COMMUNITY PLAN CONTRACT 10. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 9:30 pm estimated time 11. NON AGENDA ITEMS 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 13. ADJOURNMENT 9:35 pm estimated time AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-B CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: June 25, 2013 (Please keep remarks to around 2 -5 minutes. If a large number of citizens have signed in, the Mayor may ask that testimony be kept to around 2 minutes.) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: .T 1 I I c �S Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: PCIAlleX`Dl P Address 1 (7 1 5 5 k, B a e r $t vd 4, City IR Ok,r CI State 0 Zip Ct Phone No. 60 3 Name: 4.10' M0 Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will / help the presiding officer pronounce: ec. ��►a `S� `I J Address 3 Md City 9^ ^ State Zip t rill t Phone No. aqo — 09; Name: Han Ci(, �� tj Also, please spell p ell y p , name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address 73 . ) Fi Si' City POM (Intl State OK Zip q 7 3 Phone No. 5' q CITIZEN COMMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-B CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: June 25, 2013 (Please keep remarks to around 2 -5 minutes. If a large number of citizens have signed in, the Mayor may ask that testimony be kept to around 2 minutes.) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name:ToAn./ G►sh Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will ` help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: K r1s O •�! .11so, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address . 1 / S 2 7 SIiJ / /i / V I/ - i City /4 State Of /Q. Zip 9 x Phone No. ✓� :j - Z fag 33 Nanudta Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: CtOriA Address t° )(k) ." ; e 7/ City (/ M U State Zip 9 1% 3 Phone No. Sty - 4 (— Q cj 7 J, CITIZEN COMMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-B CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: June 25, 2013 (Please keep remarks to around 2 -5 minutes. If a large number of citizens have signed in, the Mayor may ask that testimony be kept to around 2 minutes.) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: Cy\ QAy(t Df ri/a tl . Aso, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will iyiauo wir21 help the presiding officer pronounce: J / J( Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: :Also, please spell your name as it sounds, if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 4 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET SEIU Local 199 Statement to Tigard City Council June 25 2013 FOR D / (DAT OF MEETING) Dear members of the Council, For the record name is Jill Byars and I am the President of SEIU Local 199. We represent 107 city employees. Local 199 is a chapter of SEIU Local 503 which is the largest union in the state of Oregon representing 55,000 workers. Thank you for this opportunity to address you tonight. I have two related issues that I'll be talking about: 1. Our desire to work in partnership with the city to raise revenue and restore services and 2. Our need to settle a fair contract for our members. In February I came to you with a statement that expressed our desire to partner with the city to work towards our common goals and we were happy to hear from the council that you were receptive to this approach. Partnership makes sense because we all want the same things for our city: A safe, healthy community with access to the high quality services our citizens deserve. However we also know that the current level of funding does not allow us to optimally achieve this goal. At the bargaining table we proposed a Partnership to Restore Services to find synergistic funding solutions to restore the services our citizens lost during the 2012 budget cuts with the goals allowing workers who were reduced to a part time schedule to resume a full time schedule and re- opening the library to seven day a week operation. We are ready willing and able to: 1. Help build local public support to pass a local option levy for immediate relief and, 2. Engage in joint legislative advocacy efforts in Salem to help solve the problems created by the state's tax structure for long term stability. To our great disappointment our partnership offer has been sharply rejected at the bargaining table. The city's attorney said that the city would be glad to have our help to raise revenue, but they want to be able to use any new revenue as they see fit, and that the bargaining table is not the right place to have this conversation. So we have come to you tonight to see if this is the right place, and to find out if you interested in partnering with us to raise revenue and restore services. If so we would be glad to work with you, but first we need a fair contract for our members. • Our members need: 1. Wages and benefits that are in line with comparable Oregon cities and 2. Good health care coverage they can afford. Your management team's current proposals simply do not pass these tests. They are asking our members to pay 10% of their health insurance premium regardless of the plan they choose. They also intend to shift the risk for insurance increases to us asking that we pay any premium increase above 5 %. They justify it by saying other cities are doing it. What they fail to mention is that our local comparator cities pay on average 20% over and above their employee's salary into their employees retirement accounts while the City of Tigard only pays 10 %. (See exhibit A) If you look at this entire benefits package our members are already well behind market. You will hear testimony from several of our members tonight about the problems management's healthcare proposal would cause for them and their families. I have also submitted similar written testimony from members who could not be here tonight. We have bargained in good faith to try and find an acceptable middle ground. We have moved considerably from our opening economic proposal. All we are asking for is the same health insurance benefit that you currently provide for the Tigard police association. This is fair, this is doable, this will settle this contract and allow us to move forward in partnership to help make Tigard the city we all want it to be. If you can convince management's bargaining team to make this small investment in your employees it will be the smartest investment you have ever made. We are all committed to this vision and look forward to working in partnership with you to make it a reality and come "Together for Tigard ". Thank you for your time. Exhibit A Local government retirement contribution comparators PERS rates plus 6% where pickup is paid by Employer 7/1/2013 - 6/30/2015 Rates OPSRP OPSRP Tier 1/ General Police City Tier 2 Service and Fire City of Albany 25.78% 20.47% 23.20% City of Beaverton 20.36% 15.64% 18.37% City of Gresham 17.92% 12.02% 14.75% City of Hillsboro 15.61% 10.82% 13.55% City of Lake Oswego 26.96% 22.28% 25.01% City of Milwaukie 22.68% 17.62% 20.35% City of Oregon City 22.91% 18.44% 21.17% City of Salem 25.06% 20.68% 23.41% City of Tualatin 27.91% 23.00% 25.73% City of West Linn 23.35% 19.42% 22.15% City of Wilsonville 22.64% 20.96% 23.69% Averages 22.83% 18.30% 21.03% Average of averages 20.72% City of Hillsboro pays the 6% pickup only for the Police, so their contribution rates reflect only the employer rates. SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR 4 /-i June 25, 2013 (DA OF MEETING) Good evening. My name is Ann -Marie Anderson and I've been a librarian at the Tigard Library for coming up on nine years this August. I want to speak on behalf of my fellow library employees, many of whom are working right now and thus cannot attend this meeting. We know that our library patrons support our library - on our recent library survey, 80% said that they would visit the library if it were open on Thursdays. I hope that you will be interested in partnering with us to raise revenue and restore library services for our citizens. Our city and our library runs very lean and efficiently. Out of our 29 library members, all of the staff who worked full time were reduced in hours during the last fiscal year. Fifteen of my library colleagues lost work hours last year. They were reduced to part-time status. They lost between 10 -20% of their salary, and correspondingly their future retirement savings were also reduced. All of the library staff, except for management staff, are now part -time employees. In 2008, we had 40.8 FTE. In FY 2013 and as listed in the budget for 2014, we have 34.8 FTE staff. Meanwhile, our workload has increased — for example, circulation has gone up by 29% since 2008. Nearly a million and a half items were checked out from our library last fiscal year. Despite the increased work load, we still provide excellent service - 97% of our library patrons rated our customer service as good or excellent in the last survey. We are committed to our residents and our city. As librarians and library staff, we believe in the mission of our public library - to promote reading and lifelong learning and meet residents' informational, cultural, educational and recreational needs. We do this job because we want to make a difference in people's lives, we enjoy public service, we want to be helping people. The one thing we don't want is to struggle financially, or have our families struggle financially. We ask for your support. Ann -Marie Anderson, MLS Adult Services Librarian Tigard Public Library Public libraries mean business: a short bibliography about how libraries stimulate economic growth The Tigard Economic Development vision states, `The City shall have a strong and resilient local economy with a diverse portfolio of economic activi y: retail, professional service and industrial jobs." To this end, the City's goals are to 1) Develop and maintain a strong, diversified and sustainable local economy; 2) Make Tigard a center and incubator for innovative businesses including those that focus on environmental sustainability; and 3) Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. Under this vision and its concomitant goals, objectives include `Encourag[ing] businesses that provide family -wage jobs to start -up, expand, or locate in Tigard." To these ends, the following bibliography includes articles and statistics about the challenges facing new businesses and entrepreneurs, and how public libraries can help businesses and thereby stimulate the local economy. Collins, B. (2012). How public libraries are a boon to small business. American Libraries, July/ August, 28 -31. "In the last 30 years, nearly all net new jobs were created by start -ups, and they will continue to play a critical role in America's economic future," noted the US Department of Commerce's chief economist Mark Doms in a March 23, 2011. post to Commerce's Economics and Statistics Administration blog about business startups. For their part, public o il libraries provided services to these small business owners and employees 2.8 million times d C) � 11 every month, according to the OCLCreport How Libraries Stack Up: 2010. The nonprofit SCORE association, a resource partner with the US Small Business O Administration, often sends counselors to meet entrepreneurs in libraries, and city ' TI development advisors and successful local business owners can lead workshops ono 9 government licensing and regulations, legal contracts, financing, hiring employees, C'" accounting, paying taxes, marketing, and advertising. z Equally valuable are library facilities: computers with Internet access, faxes and copiers, and space for meetings and training. "It's like we're sitting on a gold mine," said Kristin �j McDonough, director of the New York Public Library's Science, Industry, and Business Library. "They can reserve meeting rooms so they can meet their clients. We let them use cellphones in low voices in certain sections of the library. They can network after work and at our lunchtime seminars. We don't let people sell widgets here —but they can do a lot of business." The Basic Business Library (Libraries Unlimited, 2011) includes a chapter with predictions for the future of business information services. It foresees continued growth in "collaborative ventures between the public librarian, neighborhoods, and businesspeople." And most prescient of all, it says "the expansion of quality business services directly into neighborhoods will be a positive force in the never - ending public library funding battle." Frey, T. (2011). Future libraries: Once a refuge, now they mean business. Retrieved from http: / /www.davinciinstitute.com /papers /future - libraries- once -a- refuge- now - they -mean- business/ We can see the shifting of talent and jobs happening all around us as people move to where the rich veins of digital opportunities are being mined. r Public libraries mean business: a short bibliography about how libraries stimulate economic growth In this battle for commercial superiority, libraries stand alongside knowledge -based industries such as IT, communications, information and web -based services, which are poised to lead our economic recovery. Several major shifts are happening in business, and this will cause a change in the way business will be conducted in the future. Libraries need to pay close attention to these shifts because they signal new frontiers in both opportunity and constituency. 1.) Employment costs are rising. Because of overhead costs associated with hiring people, more and more businesses will work with teams gathered on a project -to- project contract basis. 2.) With the tools available on the Internet, far more power and control is being placed into the hands of the individual. 3.) Fewer businesses require people to physically move to accept a job. Consequently, shifting positions frequently is far less disruptive. The trend I see is business moving toward a much more organic style of operation where available talent will form around specific projects, and once completed, will disband and form around the next opportunity. However, a new breed of solo business has emerged that allows people to leverage the power of the Internet and control a vast empire from their home office or wherever they happen to be. Across the world, thousands of people are giving birth to what I call an "Empire of One." An Empire of One business is a one - person operation (though, sometimes a married couple) with far reaching spheres of influence. Typically the business out - sources everything — information products marketed and sold online, or products manufactured in China or India, sent to a distribution center in the US, with customers in the UK and Brazil. Manufacturing, marketing, bookkeeping, accounting, legal needs, and operations are all outsourced to other businesses around the world. In addition to product based businesses, other Empire of One models will include coaching and consulting businesses, freelancers, Internet -based businesses, solo practitioners and much more. Over 80 percent of all new startups will be created by this kind of lifestyle entrepreneur — people who've gone into business to take more control over their own lives and to build a lifestyle that suits them. Health and happiness have replaced wealth as the new mantra of the mid -life professional. Fifty -seven percent of the work force now insists they will not take on the extra stress associated with greater responsibility even if it means more money. Once economies improve, middle -age workers searching for meaning and significance in their lives will cause an exponential increase in this type of business in the years ahead. One - person operations involve numerous challenges that not all individuals are equipped to handle. As a support mechanism for their growing numbers, business colonies will begin to form around such diverse industrial sectors as photonics, nanotech, biotech, IT niches and many more.... Libraries are a natural partner for business colonies. The need for information services, research assistance, as well as meeting place and work space will form the foundational underpinnings for the library- business colony relationship.... In his 2006 book The Long Tail, WIRED Magazine Editor Chris Anderson asserted, "When the tools of production are available to everyone, everyone becomes a producer." People are no longer 1 v Public libraries mean business: a short bibliography about how libraries stimulate economic growth satisfied with information flowing one way. They want to participate in it, add their own contributions, and claim a stake. To accomplish this, libraries need to expand their technical offerings, make themselves tools of production. These tools will allow visitors to transition from readers to writers, from listeners to composers, from television watchers to television producers. The ultimate "library of the future" for your community is a home of highly relevant informational experiences, where great ideas are born, and people find tools and facilities to act on their ideas. Logan, R. and LaRue, J. (2009). Libraries mean business. Retrieved from http: / / douglascountylibraries .org /AboutUs /LaRuesViews /2009 /051409 Despite the fact that public entities are often told that we should run ourselves more like businesses, the sad truth is this: most businesses don't make it. The ones that do are the ones that do their homework. And where do smart people go to do their homework? The library. Let me say that again. The library and its resources just might make the difference between the success or failure of your business. Libraries can - and do - add enormous value to our communities. To that end, we're also investigating hosting, or partnering to host, an "economic summit" -- an opportunity to bring together both business and government players to talk about how we can keep at least our local economy humming. Stay tuned. Douglas County Libraries: we mean business. Tague- Sutcliffe, J., Tripp, P., & Vaughan, L.Q. (1996). The value of the public library to small businesses. $,Q 36(2), p. 262. The small business sector is the most vital part of the economy of North America and of many other parts of the world. In Canada, for example, approximately 85 percent of all new employment is being created by smallbusinesses. Unfortunately, though, more than 75 percent of new firms fail within three years of startup, and one of the main reasons for this failure is lack of knowledge.[1] Access to accurate and current information is very important for a small business, both at start-up and during day -to -day operation. Small businesses need to know about suppliers, potential customers, sources of financing, marketing strategies, government regulations, and a host of other concerns. Frequently their owners have little time to engage in long searches for this information. They do not have the resources available in larger firms: special libraries, information centers, or information officers. Small businesses, unlike many of these larger firms, are located within and associated with a single geographic community. Thus, the public library, whose role is to provide information to a specific geographic area, would seem to be a natural information provider for small entrepreneurs within the community. Public libraries mean business: a short bibliography about how libraries stimulate economic growth Business librarians in public libraries have long suspected that their largest user group has been smallbusiness owners in the initial phase of business formation. This study confirms that suspicion. Knowing that it is younger businesses that need public library services has a very important implication. Considering the fact that small business is the sector of the economy that is currently expanding, the proportion of youngbusinesses will increase. This means that the services of public libraries will be needed by a larger percentage of businesses, and the closing or curtailing of these services will have an impact on a greater percentage of businesses in coming years than it does at present. This knowledge should add ammunition topublic libraries, efforts to market services both to local funding bodies and small business communities. U.S. Small Business Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://web.sba.gov/faqs/faqindex.cfm?areaID=24 In 2009, more than half a million new, small businesses were started. That same year, more than 600,000 small businesses closed. Only one quarter of small businesses stay in business 15 years or more. Small businesses accounted for 65 percent (or 9.8 million) of the 15 million net new jobs created between 1993 and 2009. Williams, J.F. & Needham, G. (2011). Libraries and economic recovery: Supporting entrepreneurs [PDF Document]. Retrieved from http: / /infopeople.org /sites /all /files /webinar /2011/11 -16- 2011 / Libraries _and_Economic_Recovery_fs.pdf According to Williams and Needham, benefits of providing library services for entrepreneurs include: • Strengthening the local community; • • Increasing the tax base; • Garnering bi- partisan political support; • Cultivating a growing audience; • Creating allies and advocates; • Demonstrating return on investment. Williams and Needham also explain that a necessary step in expanding library services to entrepreneurs is to "support their use of modern office tools and technologies." They also advocate "rebrand[ing] around innovation." Another important role that the library can play is to provide problem - solving tools and support in using them. Finally, Williams and Needham recommend partnering for ongoing success. 0 11 CA Affordable Health Care Testimony C�dl As you move forward through the bargaining process, we appreciate having the opportunity to share with you information you need to negotiate productively, with respect and care for all of us who are proud to keep the City of Tigard working. Thank you for supporting the idea of collaboration, which will help us all understand one another better. Here are are few points we 0 ask you to bear in mind as you make decisions that affect the cost of health care for all: 2 ..� 1. Many of us who have had long careers with the city are earning less than we did 10 or more years ago. Long term employees do not earn raises once their steps are complete. That is one of many reasons we always fight for COLA adjustments in pay. Many long term employees faced pay reductions of 10 -20% after last year's budget cuts. With additional cuts in pay due to health insurance premium contributions, many of us will no longer be earning enough to live comfortably. People are already struggling, and with the city's proposal for us to pay 10% of our insurance premiums, we have heard from long term, committed staff who will need to rely on federal and state welfare in order to make ends meet (if they can qualify for it), or are anticipating needing to make major life changes like giving up their homes. 2. Mandatory 10% health insurance premium contributions are an inequitable pay reduction. City union employees make salaries ranging from $22,000 to $78,000 a year, and we all have the same insurance options available to us. A person who earns $22,000 a year and insures a family on a Kaiser plan will contribute about $180 a month to his or her premium. That's 10% of his or her monthly gross income. A person earning $78,000 will contribute the same amount for the same plan, less than 3% of his or her monthly gross income. Clearly, with this proposal the people with the toughest economic challenges will suffer the most. These calculations assume that these hypothetical employees did not have their hours cut to less than full time last year. In fact, many people, especially folks in the library, did lose hours and are therefore already earning less. There must be a more equitable solution. 3. When we faced cuts last year, the City engaged us in a process that was as transparent as possible while also respectful of our concerns, ideas and need for up- to-date information. The cuts were hard, but those of us who were willing and able to stay did so knowing that the City seemed to care enough about us enough to do the right thing. The current proposal to require us to pay a significant portion of our health benefits is a flawed business decision that over taxes employees, allowing the City to save money by once again reducing our pay. The immediate negative impact would manifest in current and prospective employees looking elsewhere for work that offers more attractive employment incentives. This will cause additional strain on departments that will have to hire and train new employees, significantly compromising the workflow of already over - extended departments. During the budgeting process last spring, the City - i2 n Lisa Elliott Terri Smith Young Adult Librarian Senior Library Assistant Janet Weber - -Union Statement for May 8, 2013 • I began working for the city as an on -call librarian in 2004 when the library was housed in city hall. I had the opportunity to interview for a part -time position for when the new library building opened in August of that year. I was ecstatic to be offered the position and to go from on -call to part -time status. A few years later, I had the opportunity to apply for full -time, 40 hour a week status, which I was granted. Again, I was ecstatic, but even more so knowing that I would finally get some financial relief for having a higher pay than before and not having to pay 50% of my health insurance premium, which was a previous burden when working only 20 hours a week. • With the cut in my work hours from 40 to 36, last July, my responsibilities have increased, giving me less time to get these activities completed in a time frame that I like. • I moved at the end of last April to a place where I would have lower monthly rent. I was excited about this as I had plans to get some debts paid off. A short while after I moved, I learned that my hours were being cut, which totally defeated one of the major reasons why I moved. Since my hours were cut last July, it has hurt me financially. • Due to my pay cut of 16 hours a month, I am especially having a hard time this calendar year paying my $500 deductible for my health insurance, due to a number of unforeseen medical treatments. • With this cut in my monthly pay, sometimes I'll have bills that are late, causing me to incur late fees and hurting my credit score, as I have been living paycheck to paycheck. • I've had to defer my student loans that I had to take out when I went to grad school (so I could get the credentials that I needed to be a librarian). I will have graduated from grad school ten years ago this month. I still have student loans to payback and I cannot afford to make my monthly payments so I can get them paid off. Now this debt is just sitting and accruing more interest. • I do want to be clear that I love my job and love what I do, but having to incur an additional cut in my pay to cover more of my premium for my health insurance that I greatly appreciate from my employer is really going to hurt me even more financially as it will give me another unfortunate cut in my pay when I worked so hard to prove myself, my worth, and my skills as a substantial librarian to be where I am at today in my career. May 3, 2013 I have worked for the City of Tigard since 2001. When I was promoted to a full time position my husband and I were finally financially able to purchase our home. Last year I received notice that my hours were being reduced by 25% from 40 to 32. This put a significant strain on us financially. Most months we're able to make ends meet, but not all. Being asked to pay 10% of my health care costs would strain us even further. We're already living paycheck to paycheck and can't afford this extra expense. Jaime Hutchison 4/6/13 I am sorry I am unable to make it in person, but I still wanted to be able to present a statement regarding the idea of forming a labor management committee. When it was first presented to me, I did not understand its exact purpose, because I know there is a system in place in which to handle suggestions, concerns, complaints, etc. However, the more I thought about it, the more benefit I could see from forming such a committee. My understanding of how we currently address issues is to talk with Gin immediate supervisor who will then move up the chain in order to find a solution. I see three main weaknesses with the current system: 1. It sort of turns into a game of "telephone" in which each person involved in the chain adds his or her own perceptions, unintentionally changing or skewing the meaning of the original issue. 2. Often multiple departments work together, and if there is an issue between departments, the chain of command is much muddier. We go to our immediate supervisor who may then go to their supervisor or may talk to somebody that may or may not be the appropriate person to talk to in another department. 3. People in the trenches often have ideas for how to make an improvement with everyday workflow. By the time the suggestion makes it up the chain of command and a decision is made (sometimes a decision that the people on the front lines may not agree with) the worker(s) who originally brought up the issue or suggestion never end up hearing the rationale behind a decision. I think this causes a morale issue. For me, even if I disagree with a decision, hearing the rationale behind it makes it easier for me to accept. If a labor management committee is formed, that would bring all the pertinent people in the room together, eliminating the game of "telephone" and enabling separate departments to work together for a solution. In addition, the workers who brought up the original issue can be included as part of the solution - finding discussion rather than just hearing a final decision with no rationale. A specific example of a practice happening in the city right now that could benefit from a labor management committee is the hiring of performers at the library. Currently, all performers are required to pay a $25 fee for a temporary business license. I feel embarrassed and unprofessional to ask a performer who is providing us a service to pay us money! I have heard from many performers that the City of Tigard is the only place that requires such a thing, so despite the rule that exists, I am sure it could be changed. I have spoken with my immediate supervisors about this issue, and my understanding is that they agree with me, but they do not know how to get around it. If we could pull the interested parties together, we might be able to problem -solve together. Another issue that I believe could have been helped by a labor management committee is the Library's current open hours. The decision to close the Library on Thursdays was presented with very little rationale (other than that Thursday seemed to be the least busy day, but with no numbers to back it up). My perception was that other suggestions (such as closing an hour earlier each day) were disregarded. If this discussion had been facilitated by the committee, at very least, I think the rationale would be better understood, and at most, maybe another solution would have been found, both outcomes probably resulting in better morale. Please consider including the formation of a labor management committee in our new contract. Thank you and sincerely, Holly Campbell - Polivka Youth Services Librarian Tigard Public Library My name is Stephen Hughes and I have been working for the city of Tigard at the library since 2008. I currently work 32 hours here but I also have to work a 2nd part time job elsewhere to make ends meet. I am the breadwinner for my wife and two young children and I am grateful for the employment the city provides for us because it pays the bills...but only just. My family lives in a very modest 2 bedroom apartment and try to cut costs anyway we can - like cutting out cable TV and shopping at goodwill. This pay cut, and that is exactly what it is, would have direct, concrete, and difficult consequences for my young family. As I said, I already work a second job and make every effort to be frugal. I am uncertain what more I could do if the city cut my pay by over 2 thousand dollars — more than I make in a month. This is the real world on the ground reality of my situation. In addition to the practical argument that the burden this pay cut is one that myself and many others cannot bear, there is also a moral argument here that is equally important. My coworkers and I work extremely hard for the city and our citizens. In the circulation department alone we are processing more and more items every year. Our circulation numbers continue to go up and up while at the same time our man hours continue to go down. Despite the increase in demand from our public we have kept an extremely high level of service. This is because we care deeply about our public, our city, our community. This spirit of service does not deserve to be abused; it deserves recognition beyond mere lip service. The city must to continue to value its employees in deed as well as in word. In this context, It is my hope that the city will make EVERY EFFORT to make its employees' health and prosperity a top priority. Please withdraw your proposal to have the city employees pay 10% of their health insurance. Thank you. I joined the city in June of 2008. Accepting my position with Tigard meant taking a reduction in salary of about 50 %. At the time of my interview, I made more money than my supervisor does now. However, money is not what my family was pursuing. I forfeited a much higher wage for the job security and benefits that a municipality could offer. I gladly left the higher wages of the private sector because I wanted to do what was best for my family. We have made cutbacks to the family budget such as; substituting dried beans for fresh meats, suspending all contributions to my Roth IRA, biking to work to save on fuel costs, declining offers to go out with friends on weekends, and generally limiting any non - essential expenditures. While I am proud to do what it takes to make ends meet, there comes a point when I must assess what my family is sacrificing. As benefits here at the city begin to align with those I had in the private sector, I find myself questioning why I don't just go get the money. I currently have two Plumbing companies attempting to poach me. One has offered a yearly salary of $80,000 and match the health benefits I currently have with the city. This offer would also entail working 60+ hours per week, which is about what I worked at my previous plumbing shop. I came to the city to allow my family to make ends meet and permit me enough time off to be there for my family and help raise my children.10% of my insurance cost equal approximately $190 per month. My family simply cannot afford this. From my statement above you should be able to determine that I am not a greedy person. My motivation is not money, it is my family. I ask that both the union bargaining team and management practice real GOOD FAITH BARGAINING to reach a compromise that will allow quality, dedicated employees like myself to remain working here. If I can afford to do so, I plan on remaining here for 30+ years. Please, let's work together to keep quality employees and protect morale for the better of the city. Thank you, Edwin Krieger June, 3 Zo 3 SUPPL ENTA L PACKET Ce FOR ,u (DA E OF MEETING) Vrl I 3ut. 1.J1 41 IhlalAa( } ckn44-^3 oY) ' I45 dev I bar30,1 Chi rta. China prrd.L1ee s 3cods r Walr &r1- arLd bo41rt W akz U11 I ;ems on i-kx -- hack5 bG- Cheap labor anti A Y4 tk1&.} fr4c p ol{u_+ 'oY, c►i JoW China � Fl risk YVid'h t s } ) pla.ns 40 )tad -tilt ndus+ria1 �iA4i' of 6.E. hn.k Ind ►a. T shad End ' 1+ buiIa , tLImas} no» - strop, 1-e_ns o� ��► a us ana_s dF cock- pared pOfkrpItul +s wide he pol1IA4 -1 ;,4 saF4 IA (treks IF Chink. has ids Wa , a-hd wurrt out 4rt U mpwni dre 1u.reL( by tits; erns of tv tck jroG +s 4-a Chi a's chits , 9 k al +ndusi-r; ,�i, pollK A of-- ai tvvIA ocean will de-u t or - triple phis deca.ee... W dl, p IA) cL1mc►.,4 r w‘te re_ 'i 1- wan -Fa be — in ¥,e c-., . r a 1" 4-h is Liwd i 4 rr4Jioh Q1 a pans1on. 4 kw 14cA.44rs 0.66 14 Wub anr►owiceel *W M- & fhrtsto -4 y00 Parrs ?tr y) , ) Hi OP CO, al-wwspkeric ernissians hurl buys rate/tut A- Wt. - ou ADI op-11 'mai keiveJ es tab, ;site el loll el►n. ate. ci 6 t;s 550 Pp Alb, w� can e•c p — a+nbl 114/1/4 «e4.4 a g re win j v4 amok &net into, rn s wildFtres dr Iti+ Poo " " ". Yew :417- an.e iloke-r t5 w 44. re cov• ca Lnn( asses billions 4- della/v -3, kow.1 o April 1413 bro-tichan Fran 14 Oil. t em k Co erne et Scum i *-s, 404 *to b &I l cut ve. L Ulan , , War 616 viu�4 vik, h to nie � ldu� {.J-- 64 al° vrr.t4- tvab2t rr►K� - 4-441, . Abs4- !-, col Cart vc -s e-t1 e,-aL ms 01A. 0)1 I- by Gavernanr ktii•Itia lour 11'1a-►� Ado • 1,1 Hi dui- ) vitAtowl`" f utilt9 G1- cAmu a tyrittuk d( cent , m aim nil LIS Alt meal 1Sk. fkis yn oyn-c y,l-- 4-o -rW br&- e- how -St- , iei cu r't 1- toe- t 64 'wi't r r c.hyt A rtt& A pl-omeh ishintit 1-e- fmkki 7 3Ic 34A) ?h h 14-,�t c � F.vm / c r, oR 6) 17_2_3 (ro pr,on1 -e - ) PROMINENT SIGNERS, CONTINUED Global Resources Project Eduardo Rapoport, i po, India oe S. Sokolov, Russia WORLD Eduardo Argentina *Roger Sperry, USA The World Scientists' Warning to Human 1 Marianne Rasmuson, Sweden Alexander Spirin, Russia ity is the first step in the Global Resources Peter Raven, USA Earl Stadtman, USA Project, a long -term campaign by the Union Martin Rees, Great Britain Thressa Stadtman, USA Gerardo Reichel- Dolmatoff, Ledyard Stebbins, USA of Concerned Scientists. The Project's goal I E NTI STS' Columbia *Jack Steinberger, USA is to increase awareness of the threat that SC *Tadeus Reichstein, Janos Szentgothai, Hungary global environmental degradation poses to Switzerland Tan Jia -zhen, China 1 humanity's life- support systems. The cam - Frederick Reines, USA Andrezej Tarkowski, Poland paign will organize efforts in professional WARN I N G Alexander Rich, USA Valentine Telegdi, Switzerland *Burton Richter, USA Kirthi Tennakone, Sri Lanka academies to address this issue and will Ralph Riley, Great Britain Walter Thirring, Austria use scientists' voices to educate their fel- Claude Rimington, Norway *E. Darnall Thomas, USA low citizens and world leaders. Gustavo Rivas Mijares, *Jan Tinbergen, Netherlands TO Venezuela *Samuel C. C. Ting, USA *Frederick Robbins, USA *James Tobin, USA About the Union of � Wendell Roelots, USA *Alexander Todd, Great Britain ConcernedScientists *Heinrich Rohrer, Switzerland *Susumu Tonegawa, Japan Betty o Canada Hu China Miriam Rothschild, I'I V N ITY Miriam Rothschild, , Hans ans Tuppy, Austria ria The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) Great Britain James Van Allen, USA is dedicated to advancing responsible pub - Sherwood Rowland, USA *Simon van der Meer, Janet Rowley, USA Netherlands lic policies in areas where technology plays *Carlo Rubbia, Italy *John vane, Great Britain a critical role. Established in 1969, UCS has Vera Rubin, USA *Harold Varmus, USA created a unique alliance between many of • - Yuri Rudenko, Russia Martha Vaughan, USA the nation's leading scientists and thousands , Z Elizabeth Russell, USA *George Wald, USA of committed citizens. This partnership ' Albert Sabin, USA Henrik Wallgren, Finland .�+ ! 4 \ Carl Sagan, USA *E. T. S. Walton, Ireland addresses the most serious environmental , i, v • !' Roald Sagdeev, Russia Prawase Wasi, Thailand and security threats facing humanity. UCS , ' ' ,r $' ,�. . •�' " " Ruth Sager, USA Gerald Wasserburg, USA is currently working to: encourage respon .• Farrokh Saidi, Iran *James Watson, USA sible stewardship of the global environment ' *Abdul Salam, Pakistan Victor Weisskopf, USA r : 4 • 1 *Frederick Sanger, *Thomas Weller, USA and l i f e- sustaining resources; promote en- . o ; Great Britain Diter von Wettstein, e r gy technol Denmark technologies that are renewable, safe, • _ Jose Sarukhan, Mexico Fred Whipple, USA and cost effective; reform transportation _ ; ` Berta Scharrer, USA Gilbert White, USA policy; and curtail weapons proliferation. ,, .' . / * Melvin Sc hwartz, USA Jerome Wiesner, USA UCS con tec stu and public * Richard Schultes, USA *Torsten Wiesel, USA An independent nonprofit organization, ; , ti .,.� ��... : -1 �N , I .. *Julian Schwinger, USA *Maurice Wilkins, Great Britain � � „ a � *Glenn Seaborg, USA *Geoffrey Wilkinson, education, and seeks to influence govern- '), x►� ver Michael Sela, Israel Great Britain ment policy at the local, state, federal, and f ,. j , Arne Semb- Johansson, Norway Richard Willems, Estonia international levels. .�•�� �'� . / 2 Salimuzzaman Siddiqui, Edward 0. Wilson, USA Pakistan Lawrence A Wilson, Trinidad & ow/ *Kai Siegbahn, Sweden Evelyn Witkin, USA QA Thomas Silou, Congo Yang Fujia, China SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET *Herbert Simon, USA Alexander L. Yanshin, Russia April 1993 // Alexej Sitenko, Ukraine Yongyuth Yuthavong, Thailand FOR C.O - ..5 - - - (9.6 , /.3 Jens Skou, Denmark Zhao Thongxian, China Printed on recycled paper ((DATE OF F 'IN ) Charles Slack, New 7Maland Thou Guang zhao, China *George Snell, USA SollyZuckerman,GreatBritain ' Union of Concerned WORLD SCIENTISTS' WARNING TO HUMANITY INTRODUCTION Human beings and the natural world five lives in absolute poverty without enough to eat, are on a collision course. Human activities inflict harsh r . , and one in ten suffers serious malnutrition. and often irreversible damage on the environment "�r and on critical resources. If not checked, many of ,. : No more than one or a few decades remain our current practices put at serious risk the future w , before the chance to avert the threats we now that we wish for human society and the plant , • ' ^ ¢ = • = ,,,,, a+ s tow a confront will be lost and the prospects for and animal kingdoms, and may so alter the :; ' humanity immeasurably diminished. living world that it will be unable to sustain life , • 4° 4 . in the manner that we know. Fundamental 1 ,4, % ' . ; • , Ai. changes are urgent if we are to avoid the ,' .0" - Ar i WARNING We the undersigned, senior collision our present course will bring about. 'i �'- Air members of the world's scientific commu- '' nity, hereby warn all humanity of what lies ahead. A great change in our stewardship THE ENVIRONMENT The environment is r: �'L, . z. "+i of the earth and the life on it is required, if suffering critical stress: + " vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irre- The Atmosphere Stratospheric ozone deple- "� "�► trievably mutilated. tion threatens us with enhanced ultraviolet radia- - • tion at the earth's surface, which can be damaging ' :.- • .` or lethal to many life forms. Air pollution near ground WHAT WE MUST DO Five inextricably linked level, and acid precipitation, are already causing wide- areas must be addressed simultaneously: spread injury to humans, forests, and crops. 1. We must bring environmentally damaging activities under Water Resources Heedless exploitation of depletable ground control to restore and protect the integrity of the earth's systems we water supplies endangers food production and other essential human depend on. We must, for example, move away from fossil fuels to more systems. Heavy demands on the world's surface waters have resulted in benign, inexhaustible energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emissions serious shortages in some 80 countries, containing 40 percent of the and the pollution of our air and water. Priority must be given to the world's population. Pollution of rivers, lakes, and ground water further development of energy sources matched to Third World needs— small- limits the supply. scale and relatively easy to implement. Oceans Destructive pressure on the oceans is severe, particularly in We must halt deforestation, injury to and loss of agricultural land, and the coastal regions which produce most of the world's food fish. The the loss of terrestrial and marine plant and animal species. total marine catch is now at or above the estimated maximum sustain- able yield. Some fisheries have already shown signs of collapse. Rivers 2. We must manage resources crucial to human welfare more effectively. carrying heavy burdens of eroded soil into the seas also carry industrial, We must give high priority to efficient use of energy, water, and other municipal, agricultural, and livestock waste —some of it toxic. materials, including expansion of conservation and recycling. Soil Loss of soil productivity, which is causing extensive land abandon- 3. We must stabilize population. This will be possible only if all nations ment, is a widespread by- product of current practices in agriculture and recognize that it requires improved social and economic conditions, and animal husbandry. Since 1945, 11 percent of the earth's vegetated sur- the adoption of effective, voluntary family planning. face has been degraded —an area larger than India and China com- 4. We must reduce and eventually eliminate poverty. bined —and per capita food production in many parts of the world is decreasing. 5. We must ensure sexual equality, and guarantee women control over It+air nwn , , rnrlawth a r1aric6nc ..,..,.,..., ,,..,..5 .•■•.,..,..,.,.. a uyauay. 1aLk.o, avlall. 1.11u1.a1 1v1 Inc uevelupeu nations are the largest pouuters in the worm touay. types will be gone in a few years, and most of the tropical rain forest will They must greatly reduce their overconsumption, if we are to reduce be gone before the end of the next century. With them will go large pressures on resources and the global environment. The developed na- numbers of plant and animal species. tions have the obligation to provide aid and support to developing Living Species The irreversible loss of species, which by 2100 may nations, because only the developed nations have the financial resources and the technical skills for these tasks. reach one - third of all species now living, is especially serious. We are losing the potential they hold for providing medicinal and other benefits, Acting on this recognition is not altruism, but enlightened self- interest: and the contribution that genetic diversity of life forms gives to the whether industrialized or not, we all have but one lifeboat. No nation robustness of the world's biological systems and to the astonishing beauty can escape from injury when global biological systems are damaged. No of the earth itself. nation can escape from conflicts over increasingly scarce resources. In Much of this damage is irreversible on a scale of centuries, or perms- addition, environmental and economic instabilities will cause mass mi- nent. Other processes appear to pose additional threats. Increasing lev- oped n nations with incalculable consequences for developed and undevel- o els of gases in the atmosphere from human activities, including carbon petions alike. dioxide released from fossil fuel burning and from deforestation, may Developing nations must realize that environmental damage is one of alter climate on a global scale. Predictions of global warming are still the gravest threats they face, and that attempts to blunt it will be over - uncertain —with projected effects ranging from tolerable to very severe— whelmed if their populations go unchecked. The greatest peril is to but the potential risks are very great. become trapped in spirals of environmental decline, poverty, and un- Our massive tampering with the world's interdependent web of life— rest, leading to social, economic, and environmental collapse. coupled with the environmental damage inflicted by deforestation, spe- Success in this global endeavor will require a great reduction in vio- cies loss, and climate change —could trigger widespread adverse effects, lence and war. Resources now devoted to the preparation and conduct including unpredictable collapses of critical biological systems whose of war — amounting to over $1 trillion annually —will be badly needed in interactions and dynamics we only imperfectly understand. the new tasks and should be diverted to the new challenges. Uncertainty over the extent of these effects cannot excuse compla- A new ethic is required —a new attitude towards discharging our re- cency or delay in facing the threats. sponsibility for caring for ourselves and for the earth. We must recog- nize the earth's limited capacity to provide for us. We must recognize its fragility. We must no longer allow it to be ravaged. This ethic must POPULATION The earth is finite. Its ability to absorb wastes and motivate a great movement, convincing reluctant leaders and reluctant destructive effluent is finite. Its ability to provide food and energy is governments and reluctant peoples themselves to effect the needed finite. Its ability to provide for growing numbers of people is finite. And changes. we are fast approaching many of the earth's limits. Current economic The scientists issuing this warning hope that our message will reach and practices which damage the environment, in both developed and under- affect people everywhere. We need the help of many. developed nations, cannot be continued without the risk that vital global systems will be damaged beyond repair. We require the help of the world community of scientists — natural, Pressures resulting from unrestrained population growth put demands social, economic, political; on the natural world that can overwhelm any efforts to achieve a sustain- W require the help of the world's business and industrial leaders; able future. If we are to halt the destruction of our environment, we must accept limits to that growth. A World Bank estimate indicates that world We require the help of the world's religious leaders; and population will not stabilize at less than 12.4 billion, while the United i We require the help of the world's peoples. Nations concludes that the eventual total could reach 14 billion, a near tripling of today's 5.4 billion. But, even at this moment, one person in We call on all to join us in this task. SPONSORED BY THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, 26 CHURCH STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238 • i WARNING The Union of Concerned Scientists sent the World Scientists' Margaret Davis, USA Ricardo Giacconi, USA *Jerome Karle, USA Brenda Milner, Canada Warning for endorsement to all scientists worldwide who have been Luis D'Croz, Panama Eleanor J. Gibson, USA Robert Kates, USA *Cesar Milstein, Argentina awarded the Nobel Prize; to members of 10 national science *Gerard Debreu, USA Marvin Goldberger, USA Frederick I. B. Kayanja, Uganda *Franco Modigliani, USA academies in Africa, Canada, Europe, Russia, the United Kingdom, *Pierre- Gilles de Gennes, France Maurice Goldhaber, USA Joseph Keller, USA Andrei Monin, Russia and the United States; and to selected scientists in China, India, *Hans Dehmelt, USA *Donald Glaser, USA *Henry Kendall, USA Marcos Moshinsky, Japan, and Latin America. * Johann Deisenhofer, Germany *Sheldon Glashow, USA *John Kendrew, Great Britain *Nevill Mott Great ritain • Over 1670 scientists, including 104 Nobel laureates —a majority Frederica de Laguna, USA James Gowans, France Elisabeth Kessler, Sweden Teruaki Mukaiyama Japan of the living recipients of the Prize in the sciences —have signed the Paul -Yves Denis, Canada Roger Green, New Zealand Maung -U Khin, Myanmar Walter Munk, USA Pierre Deligne, France Peter Greenwood, Great Britain Gundev Khush, India Anne Murray, Sweden Warning so far. These men and women represent 71 countries, Frank Dixon USA Edward Goldberg, USA Susan Kieffer, USA *Joseph Murray, USA including all of the 19 largest economic powers, all of the 12 most Johanna Dobereiner, Brazil Coluthur Gopolan, India *Klaus von Klitzing, Germany Noreen Murray, Great Britain populous nations, 12 countries in Africa, 14 in Asia, 19 in Europe, Joseph Doob, USA Stephen Jay Gould, USA *Aaron Klug, Great Britain Lawrence Mysak, Canada and 12 in Latin America. Below is a list of prominent individuals *Renato Dulbecco, USA *Roger Guillemin, USA E. F. Knipling, USA Jayant Vishnu Narlikar, India who have signed the Warning. Henri Dzinotyiweyi, Zimbabwe Herbert Gutowsky, USA Walter Kohn, USA Anwar Nasim, Saudi Arabia *Manfred Eigen, Germany Erwin Hahn, USA Janos Komai, Hungary Kim Nasmyth, Great Britain Samuel Eilenberg, USA Gonzalo Halffter, Mexico Aderemi Kuku, Nigeria James Neel, USA Anatole Abragam, France *Baruch Blumberg, USA Mandi Elmandjra, Morocco Keratin Hall, Sweden Ikuo Kushiro, Japan *Louis Neel, France Carlos Aguirre, Bolivia Bert Bolin, Sweden Paul Ehrlich, USA Mohammed Ahmed Hamdan, Devendra Lal, India Yuval Ne'eman, Israel Bruce Alberts, USA *Norman Borlaug, USA Thomas Eisner, USA Jordan Gerald Cecil Lalor, Jamaica Oleg M. Nefedov, Russia Walter Alvarez, USA Frederick Bormann, USA Mohammed T. El -Ashry, Egypt Adrian Hamoui, Kuwait Gerardo Lamas - Muller, Peru *Erwin Neher, Germany Vigar Uddin Ammad, Pakistan Raoul Bott, USA *Gertrude Elion, USA A. M. Harun -Ar Rashid, Torvard Laurent, Sweden *Marshall Nirenberg, USA Claude Allegre, France Ronald Breslow, USA Aina Elvius, Sweden Bangladesh *Leon Lederman, USA Yasutomi Nishizuka, Japan Michael Alpers, Papua New Guinea Ricardo Bressani, Guatemala K. 0. Emery, USA Mohammed H. A. Hassan, Sudan Sang Soo Lee, Rep. of Korea John S. Nkoma, Botswana Anne Anastasi, USA Hermann Bruck, Great Britain Paul Erdos, Hungary Ahmed Hassanli, Tanzania *Yuan T. Lee, USA Paul Nchoji Nkwi, Cameroon *Philip Anderson, USA Gerardo Budowski, Costa Rica *Richard Ernst, Switzerland *Herbert Hauptman, USA Susan Leeman, USA Howard Odum, USA *Christian Anfinsen, USA E. Margaret Burbidge, USA Vittorio Ersparmer, Italy Stephen Hawking, Great Britain *Jean-Marie Lehn, France Bede Nwoye Okigbo, Nigeria How Ghee Ang, Singapore Robert Burris, USA Sandra Faber, USA Elizabeth Hay, USA *Wassily Leontief, USA Ayub Khan Ommaya, Pakistan *Werner Artier, Switzerland Glenn Burton, USA Nina Federoff, USA *Dudley Herschbach, USA Luna Leopold, USA Cyril Agodi Onwumechili, Nigeria Mary Ellen Awry, USA *Adolf Butenandt, Germany Herman Feshbach, USA *Gerhard Herzberg, Canada Louis Leprince- Ringuet, France Mary Jane Osbom, USA *Julius Axelrod, USA Sergio Cabrera, Chile *Ernst Otto Fischer, Germany *Antony Hewish, Great Britain Vladilen Letokhov, Russia Yuri Ossipyan, Russia Michael Atiyah, Great Britain Paulo C. Campos, Philippines Inga Fischer Hjalmars, Sweden *George Hitchings, USA *Rita Levi - Montalcini, USA Autar Singh Paintal, India Howard Bachrach, USA Ennio Candotti, Brazil Michael Ellis Fisher, Great Britain *Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin, Li Chang -lin, China George Pake, USA John Backus, USA Henri Cartan, France *Val Fitch, USA Great Britain Shari Tao Liao, China *George Palade, USA Achmad Baiquni, Indonesia Carlos Chagas, Brazil Dagfinn Follesdal, Norway *Roald Hoffman, USA *William Lipscomb, USA Mary Lou Pardue, USA *David Baltimore, USA Sivaramakrishna Chandrasekhar, *William Fowler, USA *Robert Holley, USA Jane Lubchenco, USA *Linus Pauling, USA H. A. Barker, USA India Otto Frankel, Australia Nick Holonyak, USA Christopher Magazda, Zimbabwe Barbara Pearse, Great Britain Francisco J. Barrantes, Argentina *Georges Charpak, France Herbert Friedman, USA Lars Hormander, Sweden Lydia Phindile Makhubu, Swaziland Muhammed Abed Peerally, David Bates, Ireland Joseph Chart, Great Britain *Jerome Friedman, USA Dorothy Horstmann, USA Khursheed Ahmad Malik, Pakistan Mauritius Alan Battersby, Great Britain Shiing -Shen Chem, China Konstantin V. Frolov, Russia John Houghton, Great Britain Lynn Margulis, USA Manuel Peirnbert, Mexico *Georg Bednorz, Switzerland Christopher Chetsanga, Zimbabwe *Kenichi Fukui, Japan Sarah Hrdy, USA Paul Marks, USA Roger Penrose, Great Britain *Baru] Benacer•af, USA Morris Cohen, USA Madhav Gadgil, India Kenneth Hsu, China George Martine, Brazil John Philip, Australia Germot Bergold, Venezuela *Stanley Cohen, USA Mary Gaillard, USA Kun Huang, China Frederico Mayor, Spain Lilian Pickfor d, Great Britain *Sune Bergstrom, Sweden Stanley N. Cohen, USA *D. Carleton Gajdusek, USA Hiroshi loose, Japan Ernst Mayr, USA John R. Pierce, USA Daniel Bes, Argentina Mildred Cohn, USA Robert Gallo, USA Turner T. Isoun, Nigeria Maclyn McCarty, USA *John Polanyi, Canada *Hans Bethe, USA *E. J. Corey, USA Rodrigo Gamez, Costa Rica *Francois Jacob, France James McConnell, Ireland *George Porter, Great Britain Arthur Birch, Australia *John Comforth, Great Britain Antonio Garcia - Bellido, Spain Carl -Olof Jacobson, Sweden Digby McLaren, Canada *Ilya Prigogine, Belgium *Michael Bishop, USA Hector Croxatto, Chile Leopoldo Garcia- Collin, Mexico Dorothea Jameson, USA *James Meade, Great Britain Giampietro Puppi, Italy *Konrad Bloch, USA Paul Crutzen, Germany Percy Gamham, Great Britain Daniel Janzen, USA Jerrold Meinwald, USA *Edward Purcell, USA *Nicholaas Bloembergen, USA Partha Dasgupta, Great Britain Richard Garvin, USA Cecilia Jarlskog, Sweden M. G. K. Menon, India Atta ur- Rahman, Pakistan David Mervyn Blow, Great Britain *Jean Dausset, France *Murray Gell -Mann, USA Louise Johnson, Great Britain Gennady Mesiatz, Russia G. N. Ramachandran, India Ogulande Robert Davidson, Georgii Georgiev, Russia Harold Johnston, USA Jan Michalski, Poland Tiruppattur Ramakrishnan, * Nobel laureate Sierra Leone Humam Bishara Ghassib, Jordan Victor A. Kabanov, Russia *Hartmut Michel, Germany India AIS -1373 3. 1. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes Submitted By: Carol Krager, City Management Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approve City Council meeting minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve minutes as submitted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Placeholder AIS -1329 3. 2. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Accept a Donation of Open Space, Known as Quail Hollow -West Tract S, from the Quail Hollow West Owners Association - Resolution Prepared For Steve Martin Submitted By: Steve Martin, Public Works Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the council adopt a resolution: • Accepting a donation of open space, known as Quail Hollow -West Tract S, from the Quail Hollow West Owners Association? • Authorizing the city manager to execute all documents associated with the donation? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Adopt the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY • The Quail Hollow West Owners Association has expressed a willingness to donate property, known as Tract S, to the city. The association is concerned about maintenance and liability issues associated with the ownership of the 4.7 -acre open space parcel • The city currently maintains a trail on the property which lies between Gaarde Street and Greenfield Drive. The trail is a pedestrian connection between the two streets. • Accepting the property donation is consistent with the 2009 Park System Master Plan objective to acquire open space within the city. • The council was briefed on the potential donation during a January 22, 2013, executive session. At that time, the council expressed an interest in acquiring the property if the parcel was excluded from the association's Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs). • The owners association polled its members and collected enough votes amend its CC &Rs; the amendment conveyed ownership of Tract S to the city and excluded Tract S from the association's CC &Rs. • The city conducted a Level I Environmental Assessment on the property; no environmental issues were identified. • The city's real estate attorney has guided the acquisition process and has prepared and /or reviewed the documents associated with the donation. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could choose not to accept the property donation. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Acquisition of this property and trail is consistent with the 2009 Park System Master Plan and the 2011 Greenways Trail System Master Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION The council was briefed on the potential donation during a January 22, 2013, executive session. • Fiscal Impact Cost: Minimal Budgeted (yes or no): N/A Where Budgeted (department /program): N/A Additional Fiscal Notes: The owners association is willing to convey the property to the city at no cost. The city has some nominal costs for the environmental assessment, legal services, etc. The city is already maintaining the trail on the property within its existing budget. Maintenance for this property will be funded through the maintenance budget of the Parks Division and will require a minimal reallocation of resources away from existing parks. • Attachments Resolution Quail Hollow -West Tract S Quitclaim Deed Quail Hollow -West Tract S Aerial Map AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City of Tigard Attn: City Manager, City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Tigard Attn: City Manager, City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 This space is reserved for recorder's use. QUITCLAIM DEED Quail Hollow West Owners Association, an Oregon nonprofit organization, whose mailing address is 2105 SE 9 Ave., Portland, OR 97214 ( "Grantor "), releases and quitclaims to, City of Tigard, an Oregon municipal corporation, whose address is 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 ( "Grantee ") all right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property: Tract S, Quail Hollow -West, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon The true consideration for this conveyance is $0.00; however, the actual consideration consists of other property or value given and received, which is the whole thereof. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, Page 1 - QUIT CLAIM DEED 5oo14_71289 Hollow Quit Claim Deed.docx1,,u,i6/18/2o13 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. DATED this day of , 2013. QUAIL HOLLOW WEST OWNERS ASSOCIATION, an Oregon nonprofit organization, Grantor By: Name: Its: STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2013, by as of Quail Hollow West Owners Association. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: ACCEPTED: GRANTEE CITY OF TIGARD, an Oregon municipal corporation By: Name: Its: STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2013, by as of the City of Tigard. Page 2 - QUIT CLAIM DEED 50014_71289 1329_QuaiI Hollow Quit Claim Deed.docx /6 /18/2o13 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: Page 3 - QUIT CLAIM DEED 50014_712891329_Quail Hollow Quit Claim Deed.docx4,, u /6a82o,3 ,� T_ y — 1 .� -- - ,,, Quail Hollow • • • ✓' � `,i. 1. ��fi �•' x., r . :S t aia -� ,t ' • ,` EC ► i - � - ice; . + i a A l _ Y r y r t% a s s n ...AP . ,r h i l' i � ti ti _ Quail Hollow Tract S ` 1 t r a • F . ,� A Approx Scale 1'4.000 - 1 In = 333 ft '' 1 '. O'' / t� °' { - l Map printed at 03:51 PM on 05- Jun -13 4s4 ' ‘•.• ♦ \ '; Il / ' DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THE CITY OF TI CARO i r ` ` • -or M ANES NO WARRANTY. REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE • d: I'' CONTENT, ACCURACY, TIMELMffSS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF » - N THE DATA PROVIDED HER THE CRY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME I E • ) ` ` 41 �M OM PROVI D R CAUSED T r E' it t..., 1 Pi 0,11 City Of Tigard `'• a + a , ,� °;1 * 13125 SW Halt Blvd Feet JJ �S T igard, OR 97223 71 1 I r 4 w ofh 503639-0171 0 A. x www tigDrdor gov A AIS -1363 3. 3. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Authorize the Mayor to Execute an Amendment to an Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro Regarding the Management of the Fields and Brown Properties Prepared For: Steve Martin Submitted By: Steve Martin, Public Works Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the council authorize the mayor to execute the first amendment to an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Metro regarding the management of the Fields and Brown properties? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Authorize the mayor to execute the IGA. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The city and Metro entered into an IGA for the management of the Brown property (referred to as the McDonald property by Metro) in 2000. In accordance with that IGA, the City of Tigard has managed and maintained the Brown Property as an open space since that time. The Brown property IGA has expired and a new management agreement needs to be executed. On February 26, 2013, the council authorized an IGA with Metro regarding the management of the Fields property. That IGA allows Tigard to be the lead agency in the management and maintenance of the Fields property. The Brown property is adjacent to the Fields property, and both properties are currently maintained and managed similarly. If approved, this amendment will incorporate the Brown property in the IGA for the Fields property and allow both properties to be managed under one agreement. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could choose not to authorize the amendment and direct staff to: • Attempt to re- negotiate the terms of the amendment. • Develop a separate IGA for the management of the Brown property. • Pursue some other course of action regarding the management of the Brown property. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Management of this property as an open space is consistent with the city's 2009 Park System Master Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION The council discussed the Fields property IGA on February 19, 2013, and formally authorized the IGA on February 26, 2013. The council last considered an IGA for the management of the Brown property in 2000. Attachments First Amendment to the Fields Property Management IGA AIS -1364 3• 4• Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve the Emergency Management Cooperative Agreement of Washington County - Resolution Prepared For: Dennis Koellermeier Submitted By: Greer Gaston, Public Works Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the council adopt a resolution approving the Emergency Management Cooperative Agreement of Washington County? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Adopt the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The council was briefed on the Emergency Management Cooperative Agreement of Washington County at its June 18, 2013, workshop meeting. In 2005, Tigard joined the Office of Consolidated Emergency Management (OCEM). OCEM —currently comprised of Washington County, the Washington County Sheriffs Office, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF &R) and the cities of Hillsboro, Beaverton and Tigard — satisfies Oregon Revised Statute 401.305(3), which requires inter -agency coordination of emergency management policy and planning activities. OCEM oversight and operational support have been provided by TVF &R since OCEM's inception. While emergency management and preparation is a primary responsibility of the county (via the sheriff), the parties agreed to delegate this function to TVF &R. The attached agreement: • Shifts responsibility for oversight and operational support to Washington County. • Clarifies some operational details. • Provides for broader participation of other Washington County public agencies. The agreement is viewed by the OCEM Executive Board as a very positive step for improved emergency management in Washington County. Under the proposed agreement, the county will pick up a majority of the new organization's costs and the other partners will apportion the remaining costs. If the other costs are shared equally by the partners, Tigard's annual funding contribution will drop from around $50,000 to approximately $31,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES This agreement has been negotiated and approved by the Executive Board of OCEM, on which Tigard has one position. This agreement is subject to approval of all existing OCEM members listed above. Assuming the current participating agencies approve this agreement, OCEM will be rechartered as the Emergency Management Cooperative (EMC) with the county taking the lead role. Should Tigard choose not to execute the document, the city would not be a member of the new EMC. Choosing not to participate in the EMC would undermine the city's responsibility for coordinating its emergency management program with its partners and reduce the city's ability to influence and shape countywide emergency management strategies, plans and policies. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Not applicable DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION 1' hc council was briefed on this agreement at its June 18, 2013, workshop meeting. Fiscal Impact Cost: $50,000 or less * Budgeted (yes or no): Yes * Where Budgeted (department /program): Public Works Administration Additional Fiscal Notes: Under the proposed agreement, the county will pick up a majority of the new organization's costs and the other partners will apportion the remaining costs. If the other costs are shared equally by the partners, Tigard's annual funding contribution could drop from around $50,000 to approximately $31,000. * Since actual membership costs have not been finalized, staff maintained the status quo and allocated approximately $50,000 for EMC membership in the fiscal year 2013 -2014 proposed budget. 1 , Attachments Resolution Exhibit A - Emergency Management Cooperative Agreement AIS -1370 3. 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve Appointments of Tigard Library Board Members and Alternates Prepared For: Margaret Barnes Submitted By: Alison Grimes, Library Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approval of the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee's appointment recommendations of board members and alternates to the Tigard Library Board. INTERVIEWS WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 19 AND INFORMATION ON APPOINTEES WILL BE ATTACHED TO THIS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ON JUNE 20, 2013 STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Recommend approval by City Council of the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee's choices for Tigard Library board members and alternates. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY See attached biographies. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION City Council previously approved the appointment of new Board members and alternates for the Tigard Library Board on June 28, 2011. Attachments Resolution No. 13 -31 Biographical Information MEMBERS Scott Hancock • B.S., Masters, Business Administration • Senior Electrical Inspector for Washington County, OR • UCCM (SCW /FMF) United States Naval Reserve • Served one term as Member of Tigard Library Board Katie Harris • B.A., Anthropology and Environmental Studies • MPH (Health Management and Policy) • Associate Director of Program Management, Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems • Served one term as Alternate of Tigard Library Board Jan Thenell • M.A., Journalism and Communications • B.A., History, English • Retired Communications Director, Multnomah County Library System • Served two terms as Member of Tigard Library Board ALTERNATES Nicci Walker • B.A. Religion and Psychology • Assistant Relationship Manager, Northwest Bank • Volunteer, Oregon Humane Society, Vancouver Humane Society Lorena Stewart • Dental Hygienist • Tigard resident for 30+ years AIS -1343 4 Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Update by Tualatin Riverkeepers on the Environmental Education Program at Dirksen Nature Park Prepared For: Brian Wegener, Tualatin Riverkeepers Submitted By: Cathy Wheatley, Administrative Services Council Business Meeting - Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Update to the City Council from Brian Wegener and Isabel LaCourse of the Tualatin Riverkeepers on the environmental education program at Dirksen Nature Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Informational only. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Funded in part by a grant from the City of Tigard, Tualatin Riverkeepers provides environmental education services at Dirksen Nature Park. The Nature Awareness and Service Education school program that serves 800 -1000 students per year. The school program includes three parts: 1. Classroom session prepares students for field trip. 2. Field trip with activities tailored to the needs of the class and to meet state science benchmarks. Activities increase students' nature observation skills. 3. Classes choose a service project to complete. Past projects have included tree planting, recycling awareness campaigns, constructed wood duck boxes, and invasive plant removal. Tualatin Riverkeepers also runs 6 weeks of nature day camps each summer. Four of these sessions are run out of Dirksen Nature Park. Weekly themes this summer are: 1. Shelter — comparing animal homes to human structures; 2. Maps & Habitats; 3. Creek Ecology; 4. Wildlife Tracking. Each weekly session includes one day of canoeing or kayaking out of Cook Park. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments PowerPoint Presentation — _ — 06/18/2013 r , jq . f, .0 N. ; j rt .. k .a:.•` Tualatin .;�'' .. �J Riverkeepers , . , coH- • • i V, '' :rte. �, Nature Awareness & Service Education Program ` y/ . Nature Awareness & Service Learning • Program started in 2005 serving 500 students at Metro's Gotter Prairie Natural Area. • Has served between 800 and 1000 students every year since. • Field trips moved to Summer Creek (now Dirksen Nature Park) in 2011. 1 06/18/2013 h* ., �f ,; 3 Part Program - P , ,J ' r j i ' r ` 'fir '' :4 is , .,it ..,,, ,- 4 ! y0� r — gip - I f i . Field Trip --.0 tea' , I , -.— IA 444 Ao , -,. _ , ti Classroom ' .' . Service Proj \► r , 1i , Nom' " ect d `�. % ` 144 1k."1 , All 1 r .. . . , , : 4: 1/4,... ' . ‘%; 4 • . .. \ . . Ir.. ,. .. . '71 ' •'. ; ?.` i' s ; ' ' s 1 ' 1 .. ' A.. } • ti 11 1 - Z j r l l' 2 06/18/2013 Al 4 , - Z.... ii i 1 4- ' c . 4 41 v i °I ty* l' ' ' . z iv ' . 4 H S i ,rJi1�r �f j �� / -,.... . I t . i . 41----. 1 i ...- i i vii, ., . i i...t, .1, ii: 4.0' i A EL „. , ,i, .. - 1 fr )tikir - '"' ..4, ... Supporters include.... • City of Tigard • Metro • Tualatin Basin Partners for Clean Water - h • Juan Young Foundation ~ • TRK Members & Volunteers • Gray Family Fund of the Oregon Community Foundation 3 06/18/2013 � - 1 r �I Y ' ' .. Cl i nclude ... `' � ii -- • Tigard - Tualatin Schools _ • Beaverton Schools • Adelante Mujeres • Community Partners for Affordable Housing F IN , , , 44:1,:f .N :, , `' `s y_ , s '-, t t' --: . . i , ' * . , ,,:' . ' ' -7 r !(‘ 1, - 4 21 ' ,...,.,- . 4 --‘14 ` - T` . ,,,,, , , 2 A '' 11 . " - - 7 1. r �'•l. ."ISZ ro t J �!. ; : 4 06/18/2013 0 n A . . ii i iti t-,, , , - ,.." , b .. i i ..,.. ,, ei 1 _.44 41 . . S.. ; } • . ma _,r;. r Y ` ,.k • .. r •. / � ,i��+ qi �_ ' ■ � r� , P w • 8b fc , 4' . .. . • f � S . 1. f.. .y 4 `Jt > I I; -t ` 6,-- , e # 014 4 ." . 4 A ullrileati , x, r. ... ife ,ilit 06/18/2013 • y. s t •~ •$ o ___ p..• i. f :;. : ' P t ' 1 § . •4. Nature Day Camps p ' Refuge Adventure Ages 4 -6 - AtiF40 , - - . . , ,.' ' . . ..._ - . , .. v , , k ' ft, .: i ( ii \ 7 0' i '... l ir ? ;irhfi p ro -- _ <' .'.. It - , k � ,w . 06/18/2013 River Adventures Ages 7 -13 ri Oft f Canoeing+ ■ • • flirt i J 7 06/18/2013 - a 4 re 1_v. i ce' - ; r s o. a `` i Ba sed at Dirksen Nature Park t . tr 06/18/2013 Ka a kin '' ;Y. ' ,;} 1 ::, ., _r. A. ' - wilifir,-' 1 e4: 11 04 . ... v i t . •*_•ve A — .... , i,; .- . , , , V ,.,,L .t.•-. • - . .r* 11 4 v:,, Iv... I t } • —.- l ♦ ii i ' a , • . z - . s a ; . • .f .i, ` • • i� . . a. _ • • . . tt f .. y Fishing at Cook Park - 1 i Y v . 9 06/18/2013 I. 24th Annual — Family Friendly Tualatin River Discovery Day June 29, 2013 99W to Tualatin Community Park www.tuatatinriverkeepers.org I. hm it m o. \ E E _ SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR , ' a /_� �,. . . • _ o .. , .,,, , , ., s. . ktj (11 3 ,, ' � , , . SOL .,t- 44 2 _ tF 7- l 4 e , +v I . l dr a . , I ,"r . ■ N >,, mat, ,,,,,,„ ..... ,.,, /W' ,_ ....._ ..„. �. °_�". _..............,;_._. ___ _ ........ - _. - + z- - -- -... -, :.., _ . - -, -. . - RESERVE Y BOAT TODAY. www.Tualat Join Tualatin Riverkeepers for Discovery Day, a leisurely 2.6 mile self - guided interpretive paddle trip down the beautiful Tualatin River from the 99W Boat Launch in Tualatin to Tualatin Community Park. Paddlers receive a guide -book highlighting river wildlife and history specific to this section of the river. This is a FREE paddle trip. A shuttle service will be provided for participants. Bring your own kayak or canoe, or rent one at www.tualatinriverkeepers.org. Reserve your launch time now for this popular event! EN ERS .. NEXT ADVENTURE Mk Y 1 4 Portland's Alternatn'e Outdoor Store AlUi• Willamette Tmdntin River WEVr H,.,,,, n1 NW Natural ‘ .,.,,,,„. ti vIaust EVERY SEASON ST AT �/ ..' - \�(/ EN ,ALDER CREEK o- .. c SERVICES KAYAK &CANOE DICKS , 1 . r.,.... SPORTING C0008 }or( t:in lt:ni� J If we want children to flourish, to become Ri v.rk..pingj truly empowered, then let us allow them to " TUALATIN love the earth before we ask them to save �� � � RIVERKEEPERS° Tualatin p Riverkeepers Mission: it. Perhaps this is what Thoreau had in Tualatin Riverkeepers (TRK) is a mind when he said, "The more slowly trees community -based organization grow at first, the sounder they are at the Nature Day Camp working to protect and restore core, and I think the same is true of human Oregon's Tualatin River system. beings." -David Sobel / TRK builds watershed stewardship Act Natural... through education, public access to -. Animals at watchi g nature, restoration and advocacy. � J / i / . °+"4 , i / j • .. I ___, _ - , iii ,,,,,, „ , „ . . . . . \ a .. . ..... . , „,:. 4, ' 77 = H v / 4,"' ,` '1106......... '� ' 'f • , i 1 ►� 41 - \ 1 4 . .. e y !� 1 f' \\ • 4; � y � • 1<}6'en« li-�rn lid : - i , \ RIVERKE SUPPL MENTAL PC is • ( ` , _ _ _ FOR h -5 ao r , M , ( OF MEETING) v r Y �.. T ualatin Riverkeepers „�' ' ` i - ar 1 1 6 75 SW Hazelbrook Rd - `,- Tualatin OR 97062 ►_ r- ; i 503 218 -2580 Fostering an it ` Fosterin appreciation and love of � � PP °'` +A"' _ nature through hands on Email: Isabel @TualatinRiverkeepers.org experiential learning Camp sessions are designed to foster self Refuge Adventure: Ages 4 - 6 River Adventure 3: Ages 7 -10 confidence, build skills, and give campers June 24 - 28 9am - 12pm August 12 -16 9am - 4pm an opportunity to make meaningful Cost: $135 Cost: $220 Member / $250 Non - member connections with the natural world. This special adventure will be held at Tualatin Located at Dirksen Nature Park in Tigard r'''"" f. r. River National Wildlife Refuge in Sherwood. Creeks! Explore Summer Creek. Dip nets to capture ,` '� / ' A- Bug -A -Day! On Bee Day learn the bee dance, find aquatic insects. Catch a crawdad and spend a full day canoeing in on the Tualatin River. �q „ 1"-- your hive mates, gather pollen, meet a beekeeper, and g 144 k (, taste fresh honey. ** no extended care available ' • n vi a --- , w River Adventure 1: Ages 7 -10 4 . - - a :;.,C Sit ti , ' July 8 - 12 9am - 4pm > l CY fR s C"'..., Cost: $220 Member / $250 Non - member � _ \I! ; t� �., ,` Located at Dirksen Nature Park in Tigard y� r t Shelter! Discover wildlife and their homes. Build your - ` ,. , own natural shelter and explore aquatic habitats during Extended Care is available from our full day of canoeing on the Tualatin River ,r _ ` - •, 8 am -5 pm for River Adventures ,� ∎ 4r / 1` • Register on -line at: __ - ` /. . _ j�• ' � � www.TualatinriverKeepers.org t j ,' II 1 /SummerCamp2013.html ' '� * ; River Adventure 4: Ages 11 -13 August 19 - 24 9am - 4 For more information contact ' filiik -S ' ' �� ' � Au m g P � " -_ ' Cost: $220 Member / $250 Non- member Isabel LaCourse: 503 -218 -2580 y • - - -- - . , 1 { ` Located at Dirksen Nature Park in Tigard Isabel ©TualatinRiverkeepers.org ' t ` Wildlife Trackers! Discover tracks and signs left by z `. t al wildlife. Set crawdad traps and fish for bass in the .r A T ualatin River. Includes one full day of a kayaking, 'ft — -- ` . leaving from Cook Park in Tigard. '' t,,,t _ River Adventure 2: Ages 11 -13 - ,s .. , y ' � `:- July 29 - August 2 9am - 4pm i-- "�"' 4' ` ` .9 " '� / Cost: $220 Member / $250 Non - member ' �« Located at Dirksen Nature Park in Tigard r\ Ah/ _ # Maps! Identify characteristics of NW habitats. - ' 1 "' Make your own maps to play capture the flag. .,0 Use your new navigational skills to explore the 6- t Camp participants also have the opportunity Tualatin River on our full day of kayaking. to take part in a service project! . AIS -1354 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project Awarded for Professional Achievement in Planning Submitted By: Marissa Daniels, Community Development Receive and File Council Business Meeting - Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Tigard's Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project (UFCRP) has been awarded a Professional Achievement in Planning award from the Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA). The Professional Achievement award recognizes projects or programs that make a significant contribution to the field of urban planning. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Receive presentation from staff. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The UFCRP was a multi-year, multi- discipline effort resulting in a comprehensive rewrite of the development and municipal regulations relating to the City of Tigard's urban forest. According to the Oregon APA, "The City of Tigard Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project demonstrates the city's commitment to preserving, enhancing, and maintaining their urban forest. Further, the project offers noteworthy citizen engagement and urban forestry contributions and practices for other municipalities to consider when undertaking similar approaches." The project's major outcomes include a Goal 5 Tree Grove Preservation component and a new and innovative approach to urban forestry requirements for development. The UFCRP also included a robust and creative public outreach and involvement program to assure a high level of community involvement and support of the new regulations and programs. Successful project collaboration was evidenced by the broad -based letters of support accompanying the City's nomination from the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland, Tualatin River Keepers, and members of the Citizen Advisory Committee, including consulting arborists. The award was presented at the Oregon APA annual conference held in Portland on May 30, 2013. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The final portion of the Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project was adopted by Council in January 2013. Attachments No file(s) attached. I rv - , ,, .. ye :,' . ,,,,.. „...„,..,....VaR N. . ' � 14 ....., Q ...„...........- . ? \ •,,,........ The City of Tigard has a proud history of j .,.-, 'NI { 4. commitment to preserving, enhancing and__� �= maintaining its urban forest. In an effort a A "``. to renew and strengthen this commitment, p s 4 - City Council is undertaking a major update �e i i 4 of Tigard's urban forest related code revisions. When complete, Council intends 01 a the new and updated code language to g �� more adequately reflect the needs of our 3 v changing and growing community. To !"' y g �, achieve this goal, it is important to receive s 0 input from citizens representing a wide . range of values and interests. . VISIT US AT e"! g R s ( , www.tigard- or.gov/trees `� for the latest news and events related to ",� the urban forestry code revisions. Or, plan to attend a Citizen Advisory Committee ` _ meeting. The CAC generally meets the z - _ second Wednesday of the month at 6:30 a ' p.m., at TVF&1t Fire Station #50 on Walnut m y Street in Tigard. Check the city's website for the next meeting date. CONTACT US AT c o _ .' o Bard- or.gov /trees a ro Please take a moment to offer your input - by using the online form located here. 0- • ° ' • ' "' y `+'. n . � �. City of Tigard 3 I N , ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ? `� � � ,�` fr 13125 SW Hall Boulevard ' b T Oregon 97223 , 0 r AIS -1282 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing - Consider an Ordinance Amending the Tigard Municipal Code to Authorize Social Gaming Prepared For: Kent Wyatt Submitted By: Kent Wyatt, City Management Ordinance Council Business Meeting - Item Type: Public Hearing - Legislative Meeting Type: Main Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should the Council approve an ordinance amending the Tigard Municipal Code to authorize social gaming with certain restrictions? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Invite public comment on the proposed ordinance which allows social gaming in Tigard. Consider adoption of the proposed ordinance. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the April 23, 2013 City Council meeting, the Council expressed support for a less restrictive social gaming ordinance. The ordinance was revised: • to increase the allowable floor space for social gaming from 25% to 50 %; • to increase the allowable number of days a week from one to seven; and • to eliminate a requirement that a business must be open six months before hosting social games. These revisions allow more flexibility for Tigard businesses wishing to offer social games and will allow the Police department to adequately enforce the ordinance with existing resources. The ordinance is also within legal parameters set forth by the 2010 Oregon Attorney General's opinion on social gaming. One item requiring Council guidance since the April discussion was the Council's request to address whether the kitchen and storage areas are part of the excluded areas in the 50% of allowable floor space for social gaming. To simplify enforcement for Police, staff proposes that "floor area" would be defined as gross floor area excluding areas such as kitchen, storage, restrooms, hallways, mechanical spaces, elevators, stairwells and loading docks. Also since the Council's last discussion on social gaming, a state legislator introduced legislation to further restrict social gaming in Oregon to limit social gaming activities to only nonprofit organizations. A legislative committee held a public hearing on the bill in May but at this time it appears the bill will not be enacted. Staff has received minimal comment on social gaming from the Tigard community. Tigard businesses and residents were notified of tonight's Public Hearing through in- person meetings with the Tigard Commercial Crimes Unit, email communication with those who previously expressed an interest on social gaming, and through social media (Facebook and Twitter) and the Tigard website. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Consider an ordinance disallowing social gaming in Tigard. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERAT April 23, 2013 - Council Study Session March 19, 2013 - Council Workshop September 18, 2012 - Council Workshop Attachments Proposed Social Gaming Ordinance Ordinance without Highlighting Revisions highlighted in yellow CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT SUBCHAPTER AUTHORIZING SOCIAL GAMING, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, currently the Tigard Municipal Code does not contain provisions relating to the regulation of "social gaming "; and WHEREAS, ORS 167.121 allows cities to authorize the playing or conducting of a social game in a private business, private club, or place of public accommodation; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Police Department requests clarification from the City Council on whether they wish to authorize social games in Tigard; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to amend the Tigard Municipal Code to include a new chapter to set forth terms, rules, regulations, and responsibilities of involved parties, authorizing social games. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Tigard Municipal Code is hereby amended to include and incorporate a new Chapter 5.22 Social Games, attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after thirty (30) days following its passage and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2013. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: Approved by Tigard City Council this day of , 2013. John L. Cook, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow EXHIBIT "A" Chapter 5.22 - SOCIAL GAMES Sections: 5.22.010 Definitions 5.22.020 Social Games — Authorization and Conditions 5.22.030 Responsibilities of Owner and Person in Charge 5.22.040 Inspection of Social Games Premises 5.22.050 Notice of Social Games Required 5.22.060 License; License Fee; Civil Penalties 5.22.070 Appeal Process for License Denial 5.22.080 Appeal Process for Assessment of Fine 5.22.010 Definitions As used in this chapter, A. CHIEF OF POLICE or CHIEF means the chief of the Tigard police department or designee. B. SOCIAL GAME means a game, other than a lottery, between players in a private business, private club or place of public accommodation (such business, club or place of public accommodation collectively referred to herein as, "Business ") where no house player, house bank or house odds exist and there is no house income from the operation of the social game. 5.22.020 Social Games — Authorization and Conditions Social games as defined in Section 5.22.010 of this chapter are allowed only when each of the following conditions is met: A. The owner of the business where social games are being played holds a current, valid license to play social games issued by the City; B. No house player, house bank, or house odds exist; C. There is no house income from the operation of a social game; D. A Business may not charge an entrance or access fee of any kind, including but not limited to a cover charge or door fee, on days when social games are being played in the Business. E. The social game cannot be observed from a public right of way; F. Persons under 21 years of age are not permitted in the room or enclosure where the social game takes place; G. The room or enclosure where the social game takes place is open to free and immediate access by any police officer. Doors leading into the social game room must remain unlocked during all hours of operation; H. No owner or "principal managing employee ", as described in more detail below, shall participate in any social game on the premises; Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow I. A charge for consumer goods sold on the premises to an individual playing a social game must not be higher or lower than the price charged to a non - participant in the social game; J. No owner or principal managing employee may accept any payment, fee, service or gratuity from a social game participant as consideration for participation in the social game on the premises; K. No owner or principal managing employee may charge a rental or lease fee for the use of the social game; L. At no point in time may a social game be conducted without an owner or principal managing employee present; M. No membership fee or cover fee may be charged for participation in the social game; and N. All social gaming activities and the business where social gaming is permitted must comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 5.22.030 Responsibilities of Owner and Person in Charge An owner or person in charge of a business where social gaming is permitted shall: A. Clearly designate the areas set aside for social gaming. B. Designate an agent or employee to act as person in charge of a social gaming premise whenever social games are being played. An owner shall be strictly liable for any violation of this chapter which occurs when no person in charge is present at the social gaming premises. C. Be strictly liable for any violation of the provisions of this chapter by a person in charge, agent, employee or designate. D. Limit hours of operation of social gaming activities on the premises to those hours during which the primary business is open. E. Limit social gaming activities to no more than 50% (Fifty percent) of the floor area of the premises. Social gaming may occur 7 days per week. For purposes of this provision, "floor area" means gross floor area excluding areas such as kitchen, storage, restrooms, hallways, mechanical spaces, elevators, stairwells and loading docks. 5.22.040 Inspection of Social Games Premises All persons who authorize social games on premises owned or managed pursuant to this Chapter shall permit entry to premises to any member of the Police Department, upon presentation of official identification, for the limited purpose of inspecting the premises and any activities, records, or devices involved in such games to ensure compliance with Tigard Municipal Code. 5.22.050 Notice of Social Games Required Where social games are conducted, each owner or person in charge of the premises shall continuously and conspicuously post notice that is clearly readable and in letters at least one inch high that such games must be conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 5.22.020 which shall be listed in their entirety. The form and content of the notice required pursuant to this section shall be as approved by the chief to assure uniformity of notices in establishments allowing social gaming. 5.22.060 License; License Fee; Civil Penalties Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow Application for an annual social gaming license shall be made to the Police Chief. The Chief may assess a license fee of One Hundred ($100) dollars per year. The social gaming license fee is due in full every January 1st. If a business applies for a social gaming license at any time on or after July 1st, the fee for such license shall be equal to one -half the license fee. The Chief may assess a fine for operating without a license of Five Hundred ($500) dollars for the first violation for each year, and a subsequent violation will result in a fine of One Thousand ($1,000) dollars. Violations for all other offenses of this subchapter are One Hundred ($100) for the first offense each calendar year; Two Hundred Fifty ($250) for the second offense; Five Hundred ($500) for the third offense and One Thousand ($1,000) for all additional violations during the same calendar year. 5.22.070 Appeal Process for License Denial In the event the Chief of Police denies an applicant a social gaming license, the Chief of Police shall first notify the applicant in writing of his intent to deny the license within three (3) working days of receipt of the application. The notification shall include the reason(s) for the denial and a date and time within the next five (5) working days to hear the applicant's appeal, if any. The applicant shall have the right to be heard and to present witnesses and evidence purporting to refute the reasons given by the Chief of Police for a denial. The hearing shall be administrative in nature and held before the Chief of Police. Rules of evidence shall not apply. Upon completion of the hearing, the Chief of Police shall make finding and shall mail the final decision to the applicant within three (3) working days of the hearing date. 5.22.080 Appeal Process for Assessment of Fine In the event the Chief of Police assesses a business owner with a fine, the Chief of Police shall notify the business owner in writing of the fine assessment. The notification shall include the reason(s) for the fine assessment and a date and time within the next five (5) working days to hear the business owner's appeal, if any. The business owner shall have the right to be heard and to present witnesses and evidence purporting to refute the reasons given by the Chief of Police for a denial. The hearing shall be administrative in nature and held before the Chief of Police. Rules of evidence shall not apply. Upon completion of the hearing, the Chief of Police shall make finding and shall mail the final decision to the business owner within three (3) working days of the hearing date. Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT SUBCHAPTER AUTHORIZING SOCIAL GAMING, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, currently the Tigard Municipal Code does not contain provisions relating to the regulation of "social gaming "; and WHEREAS, ORS 167.121 allows cities to authorize the playing or conducting of a social game in a private business, private club, or place of public accommodation; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Police Department requests clarification from the City Council on whether they wish to authorize social games in Tigard; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to amend the Tigard Municipal Code to include a new chapter to set forth terms, rules, regulations, and responsibilities of involved parties, authorizing social games. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Tigard Municipal Code is hereby amended to include and incorporate a new Chapter 5.22 Social Games, attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after thirty (30) days following its passage and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2013. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: Approved by Tigard City Council this day of , 2013. John L. Cook, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow EXHIBIT "A" Chapter 5.22 - SOCIAL GAMES Sections: 5.22.010 Definitions 5.22.020 Social Games — Authorization and Conditions 5.22.030 Responsibilities of Owner and Person in Charge 5.22.040 Inspection of Social Games Premises 5.22.050 Notice of Social Games Required 5.22.060 License; License Fee; Civil Penalties 5.22.070 Appeal Process for License Denial 5.22.080 Appeal Process for Assessment of Fine 5.22.010 Definitions As used in this chapter, A. CHIEF OF POLICE or CHIEF means the chief of the Tigard police department or designee. B. SOCIAL GAME means a game, other than a lottery, between players in a private business, private club or place of public accommodation (such business, club or place of public accommodation collectively referred to herein as, "Business ") where no house player, house bank or house odds exist and there is no house income from the operation of the social game. 5.22.020 Social Games — Authorization and Conditions Social games as defined in Section 5.22.010 of this chapter are allowed only when each of the following conditions is met: A. The owner of the business where social games are being played holds a current, valid license to play social games issued by the City; B. No house player, house bank, or house odds exist; C. There is no house income from the operation of a social game; D. A Business may not charge an entrance or access fee of any kind, including but not limited to a cover charge or door fee, on days when social games are being played in the Business. E. The social game cannot be observed from a public right of way; F. Persons under 21 years of age are not permitted in the room or enclosure where the social game takes place; G. The room or enclosure where the social game takes place is open to free and immediate access by any police officer. Doors leading into the social game room must remain unlocked during all hours of operation; H. No owner or "principal managing employee ", as described in more detail below, shall participate in any social game on the premises; Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow I. A charge for consumer goods sold on the premises to an individual playing a social game must not be higher or lower than the price charged to a non - participant in the social game; J. No owner or principal managing employee may accept any payment, fee, service or gratuity from a social game participant as consideration for participation in the social game on the premises; K. No owner or principal managing employee may charge a rental or lease fee for the use of the social game; L. At no point in time may a social game be conducted without an owner or principal managing employee present; M. No membership fee or cover fee may be charged for participation in the social game; and N. All social gaming activities and the business where social gaming is permitted must comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 5.22.030 Responsibilities of Owner and Person in Charge An owner or person in charge of a business where social gaming is permitted shall: A. Clearly designate the areas set aside for social gaming. B. Designate an agent or employee to act as person in charge of a social gaming premise whenever social games are being played. An owner shall be strictly liable for any violation of this chapter which occurs when no person in charge is present at the social gaming premises. C. Be strictly liable for any violation of the provisions of this chapter by a person in charge, agent, employee or designate. D. Limit hours of operation of social gaming activities on the premises to those hours during which the primary business is open. E. Limit social gaming activities to no more than 50% (Fifty percent) of the floor area of the premises. Social gaining may occur 7 days per week. For purposes of this provision, "floor area" means gross floor area excluding areas such as kitchen, storage, restrooms, hallways, mechanical spaces, elevators, stairwells and loading docks. 5.22.040 Inspection of Social Games Premises All persons who authorize social games on premises owned or managed pursuant to this Chapter shall permit entry to premises to any member of the Police Department, upon presentation of official identification, for the limited purpose of inspecting the premises and any activities, records, or devices involved in such games to ensure compliance with Tigard Municipal Code. 5.22.050 Notice of Social Games Required Where social games are conducted, each owner or person in charge of the premises shall continuously and conspicuously post notice that is clearly readable and in letters at least one inch high that such games must be conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth in Section 5.22.020 which shall be listed in their entirety. The form and content of the notice required pursuant to this section shall be as approved by the chief to assure uniformity of notices in establishments allowing social gaming. 5.22.060 License; License Fee; Civil Penalties Ordinance No.13- Revisions highlighted in yellow Application for an annual social gaming license shall be made to the Police Chief. The Chief may assess a license fee of One Hundred ($100) dollars per year. The social gaming license fee is due in full every January 1st. If a business applies for a social gaming license at any time on or after July 1st, the fee for such license shall be equal to one -half the license fee. The Chief may assess a fine for operating without a license of Five Hundred ($500) dollars for the first violation for each year, and a subsequent violation will result in a fine of One Thousand ($1,000) dollars. Violations for all other offenses of this subchapter are One Hundred ($100) for the first offense each calendar year; Two Hundred Fifty ($250) for the second offense; Five Hundred ($500) for the third offense and One Thousand ($1,000) for all additional violations during the same calendar year. 5.22.070 Appeal Process for License Denial In the event the Chief of Police denies an applicant a social gaming license, the Chief of Police shall first notify the applicant in writing of his intent to deny the license within three (3) working days of receipt of the application. The notification shall include the reason(s) for the denial and a date and time within the next five (5) working days to hear the applicant's appeal, if any. The applicant shall have the right to be heard and to present witnesses and evidence purporting to refute the reasons given by the Chief of Police for a denial. The hearing shall be administrative in nature and held before the Chief of Police. Rules of evidence shall not apply. Upon completion of the hearing, the Chief of Police shall make finding and shall mail the final decision to the applicant within three (3) working days of the hearing date. 5.22.080 Appeal Process for Assessment of Fine In the event the Chief of Police assesses a business owner with a fine, the Chief of Police shall notify the business owner in writing of the fine assessment. The notification shall include the reason(s) for the fine assessment and a date and time within the next five (5) working days to hear the business owner's appeal, if any. The business owner shall have the right to be heard and to present witnesses and evidence purporting to refute the reasons given by the Chief of Police for a denial. The hearing shall be administrative in nature and held before the Chief of Police. Rules of evidence shall not apply. Upon completion of the hearing, the Chief of Police shall make finding and shall mail the final decision to the business owner within three (3) working days of the hearing date. Ordinance No.13- AGENDA ITEM No. 6 June 25, 2013 TESTIMONY SIGN -UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE SOCIAL GAMING Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose a Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 June 25, 2013 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent — (Speaking In Favor) Opponent — (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. AIS -1260 7 Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 25 Minutes Agenda Title: Discussion on Draft Recommendation to Southwest Corridor Plan Steering Committee Submitted By: Judith Gray, Community Development Council Business Meeting - Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: ' Information ISSUE Council will receive an update and provide input to Mayor Cook on the Southwest Corridor Phase 1 decision, including which high capacity transit options are recommended for further evaluation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST NA KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the May 21 City Council Work Session, staff presented preliminary findings on the Southwest Corridor high capacity transit (HCT) evaluation results. The key findings indicate significant future transit demand within the corridor. Estimated ridership for year 2035 indicate approximately 22,500 daily riders for Light Rail and 20,100 daily riders on Bus Rapid Transit. At the June 10 Steering Committee meeting, Metro staff presented the draft recommendation from the Project Team Leaders (PTL) committee, which includes Tigard staff representation. A "June 3 Discussion Draft" was provided to Council for review upon receipt, along with a summary memorandum from staff. Minor changes were made to the Discussion Draft prior to the Steering Committee (provided as Attachment A). However, the major points of the recommendation remain unchanged. The summary memo is provided as Attachment B, for your reference. Also provided for your information are letters from the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC), Central City Advisory Committee (CCAC), and Planning Commission (Attachment C); as well as a summary of a questionnaire that was posted on the City of Tigard website (Attachment D) The Steering Committee will meet again on July 8 to provide direction on the draft recommendation. Staff will return to Council with an update at the July 16 Work Session, if needed. The final meeting of the Steering Committee is scheduled for July 22, 9:30 -11:30 a.m., in the Tigard Library. OTHER ALTERNATIVES NA COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Council has made participation in the Southwest Corridor Plan a priority goal. In 2012, Council's acceptance of the High Capacity Transit Land Use Plan was a significant step toward this goal. In addition, traffic congestion in the corridor has long been a priority for council. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION SW Corridor Plan November 15, 2011 November 20, 2012 February 19, 2013 March 19, 2013 May 21, 2013 Agenda items associated with High Capacity Transit Land lise Plan January 18, 2011 April 26, 2011 July 19, 2011 November 18, 2011 May 15, 2012 August 14, 2012 Attachments Attachment A - Draft Recommendation Attachment B - 2013 Recommendation Summary Attachment C - Board and Commission Letters Atachment D - Summary of Tigard Web Survey 6 R E A T PLACES Attachment A DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 lit Cnrr Poand • Sherwood • Tigard • Tualatin r� rtl leaven.,• Durhsn• King City • Lake Oswego Draft PTL recommendation Muhnomah County • Washington County ODOT • in Met • Metro U, vl Making investments in the 11 • T • Overv n Southwest Corridor • 4 mi l - . '`i, , ^: 17 This document presents a draft recommendation and action plan for the Southwest Corridor Plan 0 The Southwest Corridor Plan and " Steering Committee to consider This packet includes. Q Shared Investment Strategy is an Cl) 301 • Yw L • a draft recommendation, to be revised and confirmed in July 0 outcomes oriented effort focused , l ' • priority projects to be considered for the final investment package - • on supporting community -based _ L. _ l __, • considerations for improvements to the regulatory environment to best leverage public investments. development and placemaking that ' } _` ---- l ' x The steering committee will be asked to issue its draft recommendation on July 8, 2013. Outstanding • targets, coordinates and leverages I r issues will be addressed and the final recommendation will be affirmed on July 22, 2013. ,� public investments to make efficient »�, rD rD use of public and private resources. A „ - % The plan was developed to support I i V ision and context = achieving four balanced goals: ” ® it ,I • , ' � r" t; The work has been guided by a steering committee that includes representatives from Southwest n Accountability and partnership ` y Corridor cities, counties and agencies. 0 Partners manage resources responsibly, 1 f Six major planning efforts are coordinated with this effort: 3 foster collaborative investments, J *' t , i � — • Portland Barbur Concept Plan implement strategies effectively and - - 7 , tip • Sherwood Town Center Plan !,. rte► fairly, and reflect community support. -' a - _ • Tigard NCI' Land Use Plan Transit co rD Prosperity People can live, work, play • _ /• '�`_ a A lternatives Linking Tualatin Analysis C. and learn in thriving and economically ! t '"'' • • Southwest Transportation Plan Integrated vibrant communities where everyday ___ • Transit Alternatives Analysis. investment C needs are easily met. a strategy v+ The project partners have defined a set of potential t^ ' Linking O Health People live in an environment investments that support land use, transportation, and ism Tualatin that supports the health of the Steering committee members community- building goals in the corridor — a Shared communi and ecosystems. snerwood _ tY Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen, co -chair Investment Strategy — to implement the shared Southwes Town center ' Access and mobility People have a Metro Councilor Bob Stacey, co -chair Corridor vision. The policies and projects are all aimed Plan = safe, efficient and reliable network that Tigard Mayor John Cook at supporting development that is consistent with the enhances economic vitality and quality Beaverton Mayor Denny Doyle communities' aspirations for key places in the corridor. p ro fi of life. Portland Mayor Charlie Hale l N • Lake Oswego Councilor Skip O'Neill O TriMet general manager Neil McFarlane - Sherwood Mayor Bill Middleton V and context 1 W r _ r 31 Tualatin Mayor Lou Ogden Shared investment strategy 2 4 0-. e l , I e Washington County Commissioner Roy Rogers The Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision 3 I 6 Durham Mayor Gery Schirado Integrating public investments to support great places 5 it a ....7 Multnomah County Commissioner Loretta Smith Action 6 ODOT Region 1 manager Jason Tell Investments in the public realm 6 King City Commissioner Suzan Turley Development strategy 10 Action chart 12 1 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 < ■ Shared Investment Strategy �' Summary of the Southwest Corridor Plan Q' Public actions can influence development in three main ways: by regulations and policies, by investments in the public = Shared Investment Strategy recommendation realm, and by development incentives that catalyze private investment. The Southwest Corridor Plan and Shared 1. Investments in the public realm Investment Strategy address all three of these areas. Q n A set of potential investments that will inform local capital o improvement plans and transportation system plan development, m Moving from current conditions to community visions = TriMet's Transit Investment Priorities, and the next update of the Regional Transportation Plan. ODD x Transit investments ;�b'1 ■.' • Enhanced local transit service to support the development of key ^`` places in the Southwest Corridor and connection to many places Regulations and policies outside the corridor (page 6) Community vision > Goals • Zoning changes • Development requirements • A narrowed set of high capacity transit alternatives for further .e. O c • Policy coordination study to inform a future steering committee decision about c o -.1\ �` Investments in the public realm what, if any, transit investments to consider under the National Ks '� c�� • High capacity transit Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (pages 6 and 7) e J F t • Roadway expansions or improvements \ OQ F • Bike and pedestrian facilities improvements Roadway and active transportation investments e 4e r c o t ~ • Green (parks, natural areas and natural resources) improvements O .ti • A set of roadway and active transportation investments that are 3 Development incentives that catalyze private investment highly supportive of the narrowed set of high capacity transit • Public development grants such as through the transit - oriented alternatives (page 8) development program Current development • A set of roadway and active transportation investments that are highly supportive of the land use vision for key places in the Southwest Corridor, including existing centers and corridors as well as growing employment and industrial areas (page 8) Parks and natural resource investments • A set of projects including parks, trails and natural resource enhancements to support the quality of life in key places, address "green" needs in the corridor, and leverage transportation investments (page 9) 2. Regulatory environment and development catalyst investments These include proposed policy changes and development incentives for consideration by project partners. 2 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 ik, The Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision - a community C vision for places throughout the corridor Corridor ' "' ' . o Each city in the Southwest Corridor began this collaborative effort by looking at their downtowns, a) main streets, corridors and employment areas to define a vision for these places that reflects their j PLACE TYPES unique characteristics and local aspirations. The area contains ''q ! a wealth of opportunities for jobs and stable neighborhoods Households Jobs ° Essential t , , n 2010 79,038 100 o 40,0 and is expected to grow significantly in the future. The corridor - w % = 2035 111,928 259,182 contains important regional retail and employment destinations 0 Priority U ' 0 - t p as well as many major trails and the nation's only urban r. X nati wildlife refuge. Opportunity . r The Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision compiles local land use plans and puts them into a Neigh'" 1/41 .6 •. .. e._ ^ common language, creating a foundation for the many projects (ranging from transportation to Al 11 , Li , 0 . arks to be categorized and prioritized based on how well they support • the shared corridor land " °n ?" �� parks) g P Y PP use vision. ; . , - e l Y The corridor vision emphasizes maintaining and enhancing the many stable single - family ,i ✓ , ...1 . a 1 � neighborhoods, while allowing for growth in certain places that create more services for existing 5 r s. residents as well as more housing, employment and transportation choices in the future. The areas Si lI ' • .. J of change are described in four categories: °41" ( • Retail/commercial The corridor is a destination for retail with three prominent shopping \--1 r destinations in Washington Square, Bridgeport Village, and Six Corners. These retail "' I destinations will continue to generate substantial demand and will need accommodation __ .. �� e Ira M , D through enhanced transit, active transportation and roadway investments. M� • Employment/industrial The Southwest Corridor includes a regional employment district with „ew gli j 1 �. significant current employment and anticipated growth as new jobs move into the Tigard l "e Dente n . ,- l Triangle and the industrial areas of Tualatin and Sherwood. `"` va ' • Mixed use Intended to include a mix of housing, employment and services in a walkable J environment. Good access to transit with high quality pedestrian and bike facilities are critical ' ,.., elements for these mixed use areas to help leverage infill and redevelopment. • • • Higher intensity residential Infill and redevelopment is going to be the primary generator for r` � ""' o ' c�c new development in the corridor. The majority of residential development that does occur will '�1 A. loyment be found in the mixed -use areas. _ To develop the land use vision, each city identified key places and categorized them based on the importance of a high capacity transit investment to connect them. These key places were used to I — ,-i Southwest Corridor ' draw the draft high capacity transit alternatives, thus ensuring that the transportation solution — i Slue uR 1:1= supports the community's vision for growth. The prioritized key places also help focus investments commercial i the e q+.en _ , M•. for other types of transportation as well as parks and natural resources. — t E. :3 ; ;,,, ^^ r1 _ 0 , e Employment / Higher Intensity A,,,,. <umu.uee.eM 0 5 1 Industrial R05ide0ti , tq^t :1 jq ne. Dennehy Ir.,01S 46, ... 0 ea = ai " Ce l , warwn 3 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 Public involvement for Phase I engagement � September 2011 to February 2012: What should be the focus of the plan? . Public at this stage 9 of the plan focused a) on discussions of the benefits and tradeoffs of c J What investments • The first public engagement stage of the Southwest Corridor Plan was held September 2011 to February different types of investments, beginning with the a7�' would you make • 2012 and aimed to determine the scope, evaluation framework and goals of the overall plan. premise that we cannot afford everything. Benefits to support great n and tradeoffs were framed by the Southwest Corridor communities from p In that process, project partners focused on announcing the integrated planning effort, informing the Plan goals of health, access and mobility, and � °' ,'`` Sherwood to Portland? p • public about the background and elements of the plan, and asking residents what they value about lan Corridor. through rp their communities. Residents and business people were asked about challenges and opportunities in the prosperity o the Southwest and mobility, m M w X corridor and their visions for the future of the area. The information and ideas offered informed decision- During the public comment period, 2,098 people makers as they determined the scope and goals of the plan. visited the project website to learn about the r ° During the public comment period of Sept. 28 through Oct. 28, 2011, respondents posted their thoughts Southwest Corridor Plan, 695 submissions to Shape on boards at an open house and community events and submitted 98 public comments via the online Southwest were made, 471 electronic questionnaires were submitted, and 20 paper- version questionnaires questionnaire, mail and email. -► ^` . were received. Two Spanish - language questionnaires February 2012 to August 2012: How should the wide range of potential projects be and no Vietnamese - language questionnaires were received. narrowed? �. The second public engagement stage of was held February 2012 to August 2012 and aimed to Januar to July 2013: Are these the right y demonstrate and validate the screening process of narrowing the wide range of ideas to a narrowed list things to move forward? of potential projects. During this stage of public involvement, project From June 22 through July 31, 2012, project partners hosted an online, virtual open house. Participants staff provided briefings to community groups and Mvtsl in Oahs GM,rq Invest,n lrarnn Mves< in in the online open house viewed video feeds that explained the purpose and process of the overall plan. municipal committees and sponsored public events Participants were then directed to a related questionnaire that asked whether the sources of projects for to gather feedback that will inform decision- making. the corridor were considered comprehensive and if the process for narrowing that list to move forward Events included an open house hosted by SW Neighborhoods, Inc. on April 25, participation in the reflected the values of the communities in the corridor. The questionnaire received 543 responses. Tigard Town Hall on April 30, an economic summit on May 21 and a community planning forum on May 23 to gather feedback on potential projects and the draft high capacity transit alternatives. This An existing conditions summary, an executive summary and technical reports were produced during this opportunity for input was replicated through an online questionnaire that will be open between May time. Outlining the unique physical, economic and demographic elements of the corridor, the reports 23 and June 26. The public will be given an opportunity to review the Southwest Corridor Plan draft identified existing challenges and potential opportunities in economic development, housing choices, recommendation and give feedback in an additional online questionnaire from June 11 to 26. The draft natural areas, trails and health for the corridor. recommendation will be the focus of the final community planning forum on June 26. Public input will be delivered to decision- makers in advance of the July 8 meeting. August to December 2012: How should investments be prioritized? The third public engagement stage was held August to December 2012 and aimed to set the framework for shared investment strategies based on potential projects that were identified in the previous stage. From Nov. 14, 2012 to Jan. 1, 2013, project partners hosted the online interactive Shape Southwest game and associated questionnaire. A paper version of the questionnaire was distributed in English, Spanish and Vietnamese to libraries and agencies serving environmental justice communities to engage residents without computer access. Community planning forums were convened on Oct. 9 and Dec. 3, 2012. During this time, project staff hosted booths at community events and briefed community groups, specifically to engage environmental justice communities. Additionally, community group briefings were held by project partner staff focusing on the local land use plans but also highlighting the Southwest Corridor Plan. 4 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 Integrating public investments to support great places 3 The Southwest Corridor Plan aims to use limited public resources wisely by targeting them in The Southwest Corridor Plan includes the region's CD Add examples identified key places to support the local land use vision. It also sets the stage to look at how first coordinated list of parks, trails and natural -s -s investments in transportation projects, parks and habitat improvements can be made together. resource projects for implementation in tandem This allows for efficiencies in planning and the ability to achieve multiple goals in targeted areas. with transportation projects to support the = The Southwest Corridor Plan goals direct us to collaborate, target resources and search for community vision. The project partners created tQ opportunities to leverage dollars. a list of nearly 450 projects gathered from local C Collaborate parks master plans, habitat improvement lists, and Cr other sources. This was narrowed to the smaller �' The project partners agree to work together to implement common prioritized projects that list of parks, trails and natural resource projects =' support the land use vision. The private sector can bring investment in buildings, retail businesses, included in the Shared Investment Strategy. The < and jobs that help make great places. Nonprofit partners and other public agencies play an list serves as a strategic resource to help project i essential role in ensuring that the Southwest Corridor continues to equitably and sustainably partners identify projects that leverage the benefits provide opportunities for a diverse range of people and maintains the green identity so important of - and funding for - transportation projects in aD to current and future residents. In future phases, project partners should identify best practices and the shared investment strategy. in proven implementation strategies to help private, public and non -profit agencies work together to ,- Leverage '+ make the Southwest Corridor vision a reality. p Great places are defined by a variety of elements t^ Target resources C that congregate in one location to meet a Add photo or diagram from pro forma a of community needs. Investing in a road work 'V ran Focusing on the Corridor Land Use Vision has enabled oft 4..u. 3! A range tY g 0 project partners to limit the number of projects included A d7bO improvement might not create a great place - but - in the shared investment strategy. A smaller prioritized list A, combining it with a trail, a culvert replacement c Q ma it easier to work together to fund and implement a « q, - WM r 7 �' and bus stop improvements makes it more likely -s set of common priorities. "' ¢ to help catalyze the market and attract private * - -- P cata Y ze P ... investment to build the community vision. By working together and listening to the public, the project Does the project `sup`port the community partners narrowed a wide ranging list of roadway and and corridor vision? The narrowed lists of projects that are oriented Cu rs active transportation projects from almost $4 billion to Does the project meet transportation towards specific places can serve as a tool for CD about $500 million. The list includes projects that would needs and local land use goals? 4 i. agencies to work with when making future v' be highly supportive of a future high capacity transit Can we afford it and when? 1 investment decisions. Even more important is investment, and a strategic list of projects that support the continued communication between agencies, land use vision in the corridor. Are there too many impacts? both internal (e.g., city transportation, parks and environmental services departments) and external +� *� (e.g., city transportation and county transportation n dib Mlt A i db or TriMet). ,,Fib $j. 4 efb 4. 3S A 0 M it s 5 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 > Action ri 0' The Southwest Corridor Plan and Shared Investment Strategy is an outcomes- oriented effort Local service /Southwest Corridor service enhancement R targeted towards implementing the projects that support the Corridor land use vision over the next 15 years. This includes exploring policy changes and development incentives as well as a Local transit connections will be essential to achieving the land use vision in the Southwest — strategic project list for transit, roadway, active transportation and parks and natural resources. Corridor, as well as to the success of a potential high capacity transit investment. In 2013- 8 p y p p 2014, TriMet will work with Southwest Corridor jurisdictions and stakeholders to develop the tD The Southwest Corridor Evaluation results, project partner priorities, and public input provided Lri the foundation for the Shared Investment Strategy. Southwest Service Enhancement Plan. (I) It is understood that many Southwest Corridor communities have transportation needs outside This recommendation directs TriMet to implement Southwest Service Enhancement Plan to = provide the following: N the boundaries of this plan, and will likely consider significant investments in other corridors _, during the time frame covered by the Southwest Corridor Plan. The Southwest Corridor Shared 1. transit service that connects key Southwest Corridor locations = Investment Strategy is not intended to be a comprehensive listing of all priority projects in the area. quickly and reliably to one another and to a potential high r� S Rather, it is a list of projects and policies that best meet the land use goals and objectives approved capacity transit line a O. rD by the Southwest Corridor Steering Committee in this early phase of the project. As project • These include but are not limited to: Beaverton, Washington 1 0 partners consider development and transportation needs in a variety of locations and corridors in C Square, Lake Oswego, King City, Durham, Tualatin industrial 0- their communities, the Shared Investment Strategy defines specific actions, responsibility, timeframe e areas, and downtown Sherwood. ) a (--- -# = and potential resources that are critical to supporting the Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision. J i p+J • This includes improved local transit circulation from the `� mo ° 7" Investments in the public realm Southwest Corridor throughout Washington County, including �� � connections to northern Washington County. o 3 Transit 2. improved local transit connections to Westside Express Service ,r .�a'..J In July, the Steering Committee is being asked to give direction on \ 3. capital improvements necessary to achieve higher transit system three main questions to further narrow the options for a potential -�--�--� functioning, such as "queue jumps" and/or re- orientation of existing transit lines to better � high capacity transit investment to serve the corridor land use vision. _ connect key corridor areas and a future high capacity transit system These questions include: modes (bus rapid transit and/or light rail) Tian, ...•' 4. identification of improvements cities and counties can make for better transit access (e.g., for further study, percentage of bus rapid transit dedicated transitway, High , and safe pedestrian crossings). and the destination of a potential high capacity transit investment. ca l. _ Ad the steering committee will identify the key questions to tr Mode be answered during a refinement phase as the project partners define a Both light rail and bus rapid transit are recommended as modes for further study based on (1) the project for analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). high ridership potential of both modes and (2) the need for additional design in order to produce The following is the staff recommendation for further study for a Southwest Corridor transit more accurate capital cost estimates that clarify tradeoffs among cost, operating efficiency and investment. support for the Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision. 1" l iu 0 11:13 Ea 6 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 D n Percentage of bus rapid transit in 0 Bus rapid transit: Exclusive transitway dedicated transitway . Steering committee decisions: high capacity transit = or mixed traffic? As bus rapid transit is studied as a potential . With this recommendation, the steering committee will have narrowed the potential high capacit Bus rapid transit is a highly flexible and high capacity transit mode, it is recommended transit alternat ves/concepts from 10 to tw tT versatile transit mode. This also means that that between 50 and 100 percent of the route Future decisions will include determining the alignment, lane treatments, specific funding strategies, r+ it can be difficult to clearly define and that runs in exclusive right of way. Federal Transit mode, station locations and connections for the rest of the transit system. - every bus rapid transit project is constantly Administration "New Starts" funding is cu under pressure to cut costs by reducing how only available for bus rapid transit projects October 2012 July 2013 mid -2014 early 2017 "congestion- proof" it is. with 50 percent or more of the project in 4iiiiiiiiisigiimk. _. Running buses in mixed traffic is less dedicated transitway, and experience around Narrow from • Direction on Refinement Dra ft Z expensive — it is also slower and has more 10 a South west E nv i ronmenta l (D t h e U an d i nternat i onally suggests t b us • vi delay with less certainty about arrival times ra id transit with a higher level of exclusive concepts to five (Transit) Servic Impact ,.. and travel times. Bus rapid transit in mixed P g Enhancement • Naito or Barbur? Statement 3 transitway would best support the Southwest traffic can still be a significant improvement Plan • Surface or tunnel iD compared to local buses without transit Corridor Land Use Vision. The Institute for • Mode p (if light rail)? priority treatments, but it cannot attract as Transportation & Development Policy has • Policy direction •Station locations riders and therefore cannot support on "level" of • Direct connection many pport the developed a bus rapid transit certification BRT for further to PCC? • Transit system development of a corridor as much as bus system that rates project performance. As bus stud connections Y •Hall or 72nd. rapid transit in exclusive lanes. rapid transit advances for further study, it is • Which modes to • r ecommended that project partners aim for Add a lane or ro Because bus rapid transit is so flexible, every P 1 P carry forward convert a lane? intersection or congestion point raises the project that meets Institute for Transportation for further same question during design: Should this & Development Policy certification standards. study • Potential station section be "congestion- proof," or is that too locations • Destination problematic and should we put it in mixed Destination a • Funding strategies traffic — or some middle ground with transit �' priority but not exclusive transit? The recommended destination for further study for a high The October 2012 decision removed streetcar to Sherwood, high capacity transit connection between The BRT Standard by the Institute for Tigard and Sherwood on Highway 99W, and the idea of adding or converting an Interstate 5 lane • T r a n s Transportation & Development Policy is one capacity transit investment P P Y for high occupancy vehicle or high occupancy transit lane from further consideration and tabled of rating the value of an individual bus is T ua l a ti n, v Tigar Thi Y wa consideration of WES improvements for another time and process. rapid transit project. Using such a rating recommendation is based '�� This recommendation would remove the option of the "hub and spoke without transfer" and bus system creates an inherent pressure to make on ridership potential, a high-performing project, and creates a operational efficiency, and rapid transit between Tualatin and Sherwood from consideration and would provide that a bus rapid healthy tension against the tendency transit alignment would require at least 50 percent dedicated right of way. Y 9 Y to plans for increased housing lower cost, but lower benefit solutions. The " and employment in Tigard standard is very high - there are only 12 gold and Tualatin. a regional payroll tax. Any high capacity transit project would likely seek competitive federal standard projects in the world, none of which g P Y y g P ac Y P ro 1 Y are in the United States. There is only one funding through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) which has contributed more than half silver standard project in the United States: Funding the total funding for MAX projects to date. High capacity transit will require a corridor-wide Cleveland's HealthLine. Capital funding for construction of major funding strategy that secures and leverages new resources, possibly including a competitive grant t projects comes from a variety of from the Federal Transit Administration to fund a high capacity transit investment. An FTA grant by more information on the BRT Standard would most likely require a 50 percent match which can include local, regional, state and other by the Institute for Transportation & sources, including competitive grants and y Pe � Development Policy, visit www.itdp.org/ federal, state and regional funds. Transit non -FTA federal funds. m cros tes/the - brt - standard - 2013/. operations (both bus and high capacity 7 transit) are funded by passenger fares and DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 > Roadway and active transportation Roadway projects supportive of land use goals and high capacity transit, by specific '_* Over the past 18 months the project partners worked to narrow a development type O large list of roadway and active transportation projects to a smaller Roadways Lake Oswego - Land use list of projects that are most supportive of the HCT recommendation • — Boones Ferry Road Boulevard improvements (turn lanes with bike/ped. - Madrona to Kruse Way) = and the Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision. Project partners Pedestrians Portland - High capacity transit rci narrowed from close to $4 billion worth of projects to around $500 South Portland Circulation and Connectivity (Ross Island Bridge ramp connections) � , million. This agreed -upon narrowed list of projects sets the stage for Bi ���CCCJJJ Barbur Blvd, SW (3rd - Terwilliger): Multi -modal Improvements 3 the project partners to cooperatively identify and leverage funding Barbur Blvd, SW (Terwilliger - City Limits): Multi -modal Improvements I'D • from a variety of sources. This will be critical, in light of the severe Barbur Signals (add signalized intersections) ,-+ constraints on available transportation funding. Even the narrowed list of roadway and active Capitol Hwy Improvements (replace roadway and add sidewalks) in transportation projects is more than five times greater than the projected $60 million in state and SW 53rd and Pomona (improves safety of ped/bike users) • regional funds anticipated to be available in the Corridor over the next 15 years. Portland - Land use '- Barbur Road Diet - Capitol to Hamilton (reduce northbound lanes from three to two with multi -modal S rip Projects on the narrowed list fall into one of two categories: improvements) -0 Barbur/Terwilliger Intersection Ped./Bike Improvements C 1. Projects to be studied further in the Southwest Corridor Plan refinement phase Barbur Lane Diet Terwilliger to Capitol - This includes roadway and active transportation projects that could be highly supportive for the Barbur/ Capitol Hwy./ Huber/ Taylors Ferry Intersection Safety Improvements r'1 Naito/South Portland Improvements (left turn pockets with bike /ped; remove tunnel, ramps and viaduct) success of a high capacity transit i While this group of projects has been identified as SW Portland/ Crossroads Mukimodal Project (roadway realignments and modifications to Barbur Blvd., Capitol Hwy., (to highly supportive of a potential high capacity transit investment, not all of them can necessarily and the -5 southbound on -ramp) CU be included in an eventual high capacity transit funding package (for example, about $35- Tigard - High capacity transit • 40 million was included as part of the Portland - Milwaukee Light Rail Project). This will be a Ash Avenue railroad crossing (new roadway) Key future decision based on priority judgments by project partners during refinement and efforts Atlanta Street Extension (new roadway) to best match Federal Transit Administration funding requirements. Those projects that are not • dcommercial 1098 Hall Boulevard Widening, Bonita Road to Durham .Mi Mixed use included will be available for further project development by project sponsors. HaNHunziker/Scoffins Intersection Realignment ■ Employment/industrial Hwy. 217 Over- crossing - lane Hunziker Hampton Connection Higher intensity residential 2. Narrowed list of projects that have been identified as highly supportive of the 68th Avenue (widen to 3lanes Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision Hall Boulevard Widening, Highway 99W to Fanno Creek These projects include roadway and active transportation projects that are available for further Hall Boulevard Widening, McDonald Street to Fanno Creek including creek bridge project development by project sponsors. Each project has been identified as highly supportive Tigard - Land use of a particular land use type in the corridor: commercial, freight/employment, mixed use, _ Highway 99W access management in Tigard or higher intensity residential. Projects were selected based on geographic factors, project — Hall Boulevard Widening, Oleson to 99W characteristics, stakeholder input and/or evaluation results. Tualatin - High capacity transit _ Boones Ferry Road (reconstuct/widen from Martinazzi to Lower Boones Ferry) As stated earlier, these lists are not intended to identify all projects that are important to Tualatin - Land use communities in the Southwest Corridor. Instead, they represent a set of projects that are Tualatin - Sherwood Rd. (Langer Parkway to Teton Ave.) - Widening to 5 lanes with ped./bike (Tualatin and Sherwood) highly supportive of corridor land use and high capacity transit goals based on the narrowing Cipole Rd. (widen to 3 lanes with ped./bike) approach intended to target and leverage limited public dollars. The lists will inform local capital Herman (multi -modal improvements, Teton to Tualatin Rd.) improvement plans and transportation system plan development, TriMet's Transit Investment Herman (multi -modal improvements, Cipole to 124th) Priorities, and the next update of the Regional Transportation Plan. Projects on local and regional Sherwood - Land use transportation investment plans that are not included in the Shared Investment Strategy will Arrow Street (Herman Road) - Build 3 lanes with sidewalks and bike lanes remain on those local and regional plans unless the jurisdiction chooses to remove them. Town Center Signal & Intersection Improvements (Downtown Sherwood) Attachment A includes the project lists and narrowing criteria. Tualatin - Sherwood Rd. (Langer Parkway to Teton Ave.) - Widening to 5 lanes with ped./bike (Sherwood and Tualatin) 8 Oregon - Tonquin Intersection & Street Improvements DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 D n Parks and natural resource projects liiiiiiMEMP IMMENEMEMP '_*. Documents that support this action and provide key information for further phases = Parks, trails, natural areas and street trees provide the "green" element .. of communities that is consistently prioritized by corridor residents Charter Dec. 12, 2077 - as part of what draws them to live, work and play in the S ou th west (http: // rim. oregonmetro .gov /webdrawer /red232209/view) Corridor. Project partners originally identified nearly 450 projects Na tura l areas'' 11) Vision, goals and objectives May 14, 2012 in the corridor, this recommendation includes a narrowed list of (http://rim.oregonmetro.gov/webdrawer/rec/248086/view) ,�. „ (http: / /rim.oregonmetro .gov /webdrawer /rec/248086/view) "green" projects - parks, trails, natural areas, stormwater facilities, CD Existing conditions summary report A 18, 2012 green streets and natural resource enhancements like wildlife corridors 3 (http: // rim. oregonmetro .gov /webdrawer /rec248092 /view) and improved culverts for fish passage. The projects on the list were - ur ban trees �, vi identified as supporting the Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision, Opportunity and housing report January 2012 _. the potential high capacity transit investment, and important water (http: // rim. oregonmetro .gov /webdrawer /rec/248099 /view) ,.. S resource and regional trail connections. Project partners are currently Health assessment January 2012 m reviewing this refined list and will identify any recommended changes (http: // rim. oregonmetro. gov /webdrawer /rec/248096/view) - by the July 8 steering committee meeting. C Project lists and development process As the high capacity transit alternative is refined, the next step in sorting and prioritizing "green" Project bundles Feb. 5, 2013 ri projects in the Southwest Corridor may be for partners to examine the likely funding sources and (http: //library.oregonmetro.gov /files/ /sw_ corridor_ atlas_ transportation_021213_small.pdf) develop a collective strategy for grant writing and the strategic use of other available or new funds. v A refined project list could be developed based on this shared funding strategy. Evaluation report 3 Importantly, the project list does not include the numerous impacts and mitigation projects Evaluation documents for future project phases that would be required as a result of a new transit corridor, road and street construction and Southwest corridor economic development conditions, stakeholder perspectives and investment redevelopment. As land use and transportation projects are implemented, Southwest Corridor alternatives jan. 24, 2013 partners will work to identify relationships to or impacts on nearby or adjacent "green" projects. (http: // rim. oregonmetro .gov /webdrawer /red252707/view) This strategy recommends prioritizing those projects that offer multiple benefits and a higher Development case studies return on investment for the public's resources, regardless of the source of those funds. Public involvement report Attachment B includes the narrowed list of projects and the parks and natural areas narrowing methodology. Alternatives Analysis (for submittal to FTA) 9 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 > Development strategy (regulatory environment and catalyst At this phase of the Southwest Corridor Plan the focus is on identifying potential policy changes or incentives that help the region compete nationally for limited dollars. Many of these strategies i 0 ' are already in place in some cities in the corridor, and our region is recognized nationally for z progressive land use policies. This may raise the bar for our region in terms of what we need to .. The public sector plays a key role in the implementation of the 1 p community land use vision. There are two major tools the public sector $ implement as the project partners move through a NEPA process. controls that can help set the stage for development consistent with Economic development Regulatory framework (D community goals. Those tools are the regulatory framework and the O administration of financial incentives which together can help catalyze The Southwest Corridor Land Use Vision expresses the collective aspirations of the communities in development to create market value and stimulate private investment. ' the corridor, much of which is focused on creating transit ready communities that can leverage an investment in high capacity transit. High capacity transit has the potential to have a catalytic effect The regulatory framework is the area in which the public sector has the Commercial on adjacent land uses especially if transit supportive regulations and policies are in place well in '+ most control over development outcomes. This includes development development advance of the high capacity transit investment. These policies are an opportunity to support the (zoning) codes and policies that relate to land development. A goal / land use vision now and to help achieve the community's desired goals over time. There are a tL should be to make development consistent with the community vision the easiest thing to do. number of regulatory tools and strategies that can help foster transit ready communities; however This can be accomplished by creating a regulatory framework that is predictable and efficient, their application differs greatly depending on the context in which they are applied. A number of La creating certainty in the private market. It also provides the community with certainty that future these tools may specifically be identified in FTA guidance for the New Starts program. The policies development in their community will be in the desired locations with a form consistent with the that are recommended for further action by local partners include: vision. To successfully implement a land use vision that goes beyond the existing development form requires both public support and market potential. The public sector has the ability to control the Zoning code changes policies and code requirements that have a direct effect on the bottom line and create a regulatory • Examining density maximums and building height environment that supports investment in their community. • Non - compliant use provision The public sector can also help catalyze development through the strategic application of • Stepbacks financial incentives that support new development forms that may be ahead of the market. In Parking requirements and parking management particular, development forms that are mixed -use or multi -story are more costly and may require rents that are above current market demand. These higher costs can be offset through creative • Trip generation reductions financing strategies and tools, helping to create value in the market and eventually enable private • Responsive parking ratios investments to be made without public support. By aligning the regulatory framework, strategic • Shared parking incentives to catalyze development and prioritizing capital investments in the public realm the • Unbundling parking public sector has a tremendous opportunity to create successful places that reflect the land use Design vision. • Layered landscapes and active open space New Starts competitive advantage • Ground floor active use provisions • Street design, streetscapes and green streets By setting the right regulatory and financial environment the public sector can catalyze the market and ideally make our region more competitive for federal capital construction dollars that are associated with the Federal Transit Administration's New Starts program. These guidelines provide a series of actions that local governments can take to leverage a transit investment, including plans, policies, and financial incentives along the proposed corridor that support the adjacent land use and ideally bring more transit riders to the system. These actions should support the following outcomes: • additional, transit - supportive development in the future • preservation or increase in the affordable housing supply • increased population and employment concentrations. 10 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 Financial incentives There are a number of financial tools available to the public sector that can be used to help stimulate investment in strategic locations. These tools can help bridge the financial gap between O what is financially feasible now and what is desired by the community. In many cases the vision that the community has is above and beyond what the current market can provide. Investments C7 (D in the public realm (such as streetscape enhancements and transit investments) are one way to send a message to the private sector that the public is committed to implementing the community vision. Regulatory tools and policies that support the vision help send this message, but direct - financial incentives in key catalytic projects provide a "proof of concept". Strategic investments in such projects can ultimately lead to increased value in the market and eventually allow for private �p investment without public support over time. Current market conditions are not supportive of many development forms that are envisioned for the Southwest Corridor. In particular this is true in areas that aspire to a higher level of amenity than what exists today. The tools below are recommended for consideration by public sector ro partners in areas of change throughout the Southwest Corridor to help leverage investment and new development. • Vertical Housing Program • Brownfield Remediation Funds • System Development Charges Strategies • Urban Renewal • Grant programs (e.g., Metro's Transit - Oriented Development Program) • Affordable housing incentives Corridor - wide policy The Southwest Corridor refinement process should include a scope element to work in partnership with the Southwest Corridor cities, Washington County and ODOT to develop a coordinated set of multi -modal performance measures that reflect state, regional and local goals. The multi - modal performance measures may vary across the corridor based on community objectives, and should provide the objectivity necessary for fair and consistent application. The measures would be intended to support both land use review and transportation evaluation. The scope of the alternative performance measures development would likely include Intestate 5 and Highway 99W within the Southwest Corridor, and Tualatin - Sherwood Road in the Tualatin and Sherwood Town Center areas, although the boundaries of application could vary from these limits. The intended work product would develop a set of multi -modal performance measures and associated evaluation process. This product could subsequently be considered for adoption by jurisdictions throughout the region, including Metro and the Oregon Transportation Commission. 11 DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 D Strategic Investment Strategy action chart -- July action Responsibility for implementation 3 Who implements When Funding for work Notes Target date for next steps (if e Lead Partners applicable) Cu Decision to refine HCT Metro/TriMet Cities, counties, ODOT 8/2013 - 6/2014 MTIP - Metro Early 2014 SC agreement: Mid 2014: Begin Draft Environmental .�+ alternatives for further study: 1. Refined HCT project Impact Statement (DEIS) on HCT alternative 1. Level of BRT 2. Collaborative funding plan for DEIS as refined by project partners 2. Modes for further study 3. Preliminary funding strategy for HCT project 3. Destination ry g e9y p 1 Early 2017: Target end date for DEIS and Locally Preferred Alternative decision Southwest Sery ■ce TriMet/Metro Cities 8/2013 - 12/2014 TriMet w/ some Vision for future transit service throughout 2015: Implement service enhancements Enhancement Plan Metro staff support the area, including connections to HCT. Long- and revisit over time based on local term enhancements will be guided by TriMet's improvements financial capacity and by local jurisdiction access improvements Southwest Corridor ODOT Cities, Washington 8/2013 - 6/2014 ODOT Coordinate work during refinement of HCT Alternative Performance County, Metro alternative Measures Policies and incentives to Cities Metro Timing depends Cities Milestones for specific cities will be tied to Spring 2014: Define specific policy address regulatory framework on jurisdiction and progress on HCT project with an aim to address considerations for project partners to and catalyst investments direct connection FTA guidelines and help the region compete for pursue in coordination with DEIS and to HCT federal transit funds development of a Locally Preferred Alternative Roadway /AT projects highly Metro/TriMet ODOT, cities, counties 8/2013 - 6/2014 Metro During refinement some projects will be Mid 2014: Partners will define which supportive of HCT determined to fit with HCT project as refined projects are packaged with the HCT alternative for NEPA Roadway /AT projects highly Cities, counties, ODOT As funding Project sponsor Project sponsors will take responsibility supportive of corridor land becomes available to implement their projects with some use vision collaborative efforts to seek funding, particularly for projects identified as early opportunities; project sponsors actions may include project design and engineering, public outreach and working with regional partners to include the project in the Regional Transportation Plan Parks and natural resource Cities, counties, Metro Parks, environmental. 8/2013 - 6/2014 Project sponsor and Project partners will take responsibility Mid 2014: Identify projects that may be projects agencies and non- for projects related Metro will look at to implement their projects and work part of HCT alternative for NEPA profits to HCT projects that could collaboratively to seek grant opportunities and be part of HCT other funding alternative 12 The project table summarizes the roadway and active transportation projects recommended by staff. Projects were recommended based on either: • Critical for safe access to high capacity transit • Highly supportive of the land use vision in essential or priority places The specific criteria that were considered for each category were: Safe access to high capacity transit Critical • Does it create or improve ped access on a connection HCT will use? • Does it help people safely access a station by walking or bicycling within 1/4 mile or a trail within 1 mile? High • Does it help people safely access a station by walking or bicycling within 1/4 - 1/2 mile or a trail within 2 miles? Medium • Does it help people safely access a station by walking or bicycling within 1/2 - 1 mile or a trail within 3 miles? • Does it improve local transit service accessing the HCT? • Does it improve road connections to an end -of -line park and ride? Low • None of the above, or covered by another project Land use goals in essential/priority places • Is the project in an essentiaVpriority place? • Is the project supportive of the local land use vision for the place? • Does the project support land use by providing safe crossings or pedestrian/bicycle connections (active transportation)? DRAFT STAFF RECOMMENDATION`, Southwest Corridor: Roadway and Active Transportation Projects - 6/3/13 low /non. H ighly supportive Location/ Highly supportive of of land use goals, Ownership 0 Project Title Project Description Cost HCT esntl /pity places Adds a new ramp connection between 1-405 and the Ross Island endge from Kelly - South Portland Circulation and Avenue. Restore at-grade intersections along Naito Parkway, with new signalized as Q Portland Connectivity (Ross Island Bridge ramp intersections at Ross Island Bridge access and at Hooker Street. Removes several existing other ODOT 1044 connections) roadways and ramp connections. $$$$ tft Ash Avenue railroad crossing (new C Tigard 1077 roadway) Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad tracks from Burnham to Commercial Street. $ 111 VI Tigard 1078 Atlanta Street Extension (new roadway) Extend Atlanta Street west to Dartmouth Street $ O Tigard Hall Boulevard Widening, Bonita Road Widen to 3 lanes; build sidewalks and bike lanes; safety improvements (construct 3 lanes Z WashCo. 1098 to Durham with development, preserve ROW for 5 lanes) $ v Tigard Hail/Hunziker /Scoffins Intersection WashCo. 1100 Realignment Realign offset intersection to cross intersection to alleviate congestion and safety issues $ D Build new connection of Huwker Road to 72nd Avenue at Hampton St., requires over- T Tigard Hwy. 217 Over- crossing - Hunziker crossing over Hwy 217, removes or revises existing 72nd Avenue /Hunziker intersection/ WashCo. 1107 Hampton Connection connection. $$$$ Tualatin Boones Ferry Road (reconstruct/widen Reconstruction/widen to 5 lanes from Martinazzi to Lower Boones Ferry Road, including WashCo. 1134 from Mertinazzl to Lower Boones Ferry) bridge. $$S CD 26th Ave, SW (Spring Garden - Taylors U1 Portland 2004 Ferry): Pedestrian Improvements Construct a walkway for pedestrian travel and access to transit and install street lighting ¢ - ro Portland Connections to Transit/Transit New stepa/ramp connecting SW Taylors Ferry frontage road to Barbur across from transit ODOT 2011 improvements, Barbur 8 Taylors Ferry center at existing signalized crossing. it Huber Street Sidewalk Project 37th Ave. Construct new concrete sidewalks , curbs, and curb ramps on south side of SW Huber Portland 2018 - 43rd Ave./I-5 On -Ramp Street from 37th Ave. to 43rd Ave. it Portland Pedestrian Overpass near Markham Construct pedestrian path and bridge over Barbur Blvd. and IS to connect SW Alfred and ODOT 2027 School SW 52nd to the rear of Markham School. SW 19th Ave sidewalks: Barbur - Spring Portland 2041 Garden Construct new sidewalks where none exist (DA) ft Tigard 2045 72nd Avenue sidewalks: 99W to Bonita Complete gaps in sidewalk on both sides of street from Highway 99W to Bonita Road $ El 72nd Avenue sidewalks: Upper Boones Tigard 2046 Ferry to Durham Install sidewalk on both sides of street from Upper Boones Ferry Road to Durham Road $ Commercial Street sidewalks: Main to Tigard 2054 Lincoln Install sidewalks on both sides of the street from Main Street to Lincoln Street it I . Hall Boulevard sidewalks: Hunziker to Complete gaps in sidewalk on alternating sides of street from Hunziker Street to the South . Tigard 2057 city limits City Limits. $ Tigard 2058 Hunziker Street Sidewalks: 72nd to Hall Install sidewalk on both sides of the street from 72nd Avenue to Hall Boulevard $ Improve sidewalks, lighting, crossings, nut r shelters Hu and nuthroughout the downtown Center Tigard Tigard Town Cear (Downtown) including: : Highway 99WW H , Hall Blvd, Main Street, Hunziker, r, Walnut and nd neighborhood ODOT 2088 Pedestrian Improvements streets. $ Bo dwe that are at let o wide along S Hwy e (99W), la where there are Tigard Tigard Transit Center 99W sidewalk none, and widen den existing siddewwalk ik corridors w- rridors all along 99W, 9W, s so there is landscaped d buffer ODOT 2078 inhll. between pedestrians and the motor vehicles. 0 Shorten crossing distances, at mase crosswalks more S G and urg R more time for t Tigard Tigard Transit Center crossing pedestrians to cross at the intersectioio of 9 intersections of 99W and SW reenbug Rd., 99W 8 SW Hell ODOT 2077 improvements. Blvd., and 99W 8 SW Dartmouth St. $ Tigard Transit Center Park 8 Ride Provide a designated pedestrian path through the transit center park and ride lot. Tigard 2078 pedestrian path. connecting to SW Man SL 4 Footnotes: 1 - HCT to Tualatin only; 2 - HCT to Sherwood only; 3 - 72nd HCT alignment only; 4 - Hall HCT alignment only; 5 - Naito HCT alignment only; 6 - Barbur /53rd station only Estimated Cost Magnitudes: 4 - up to $500,000; $ - up to $5 Million; $$ - up to $10 Million; $5$ - up to $20 Million; $$$$ - More than $20 Million w ei.lali.I) 6UIMOJieU pUe Sj}Sil ppalO.Id uoRelAodsue.n. aAp.pe pUe /SeMpeOH :v lUaWtpe;i`d •A eIJapIJ) 6UIMOJJeU pue Sj5!I peEoJd voile IOCISUen ann.pe pup AeMpeo8 :v luawtpe;wd DRAFT STAFF RECOMMENDATION cr Kai Southwest Corridor: Roadway and Active Transportation Projects - 6/3/13 onsiNiern Highly supportive Location/ Highly supportive of of land use goals. Ownership it Project Title Project Description Cost HCT sntl /prey places Formalize the informal path running Center Street Connection from SW Commercial St. t. to N SW SW Hall Blvd .. by pacing 4 making , making it ADA accessible, providing lighting, and Tigard 2079 Tigard Transit Center pedestrien path wayfinding sgnage. it Build sidewalks. the Tigard where there are none, p along SW Scoffos S 8 Ash St. These streets are near the Tigard Transit sit and Center a provide it. Ensure access to Ensure re there is a landscaped Tigard 2080 Tigard Transit Center sidewalk in fill. buffer between pedestrians and motor vehicles. 0 Locust St to Durham Rd- pedestrian infra (Note to be consistent with SW project list this 4 all Tigard 2090 Hall Blvd sidewalks: Locust to Hunker should be Locust to Hunziker) $ Other Pedestrian connection from Barbur to Construct a new pedestrian walkway under the tram within the Gibbs right-of-way through Portland 2999 Terwilliger at Gibbs the Terwilliger Parkway. The steep grade and forested area will require lighting and stairs. $ Multiple bicycle facility types: bicycle boulevard or enhanced shared roadway (Barbur • Capitol Hill Rd bikeway -from SW Troy, 21st - Custer); bicycle boulevard or advisory bike lane (Troy- 21st); enhanced shored Portland 3017 Barbur Blvd to SW Bertha Blvd. roadway (Custer - Bertha) it Inner Hamilton bikeway -from SW Portland 3028 Terwilliger Blvd to SW Corbett Ave. Enhanced shared roadway. Includes connection to Terwilliger on SW Hamilton Terrace 0 Inner Troy bikeway -from SW Capitol Portland 3033 Hwy to SW Capitol Hill Rd, Bike boulevard from SW Capitol Hwy to SW Capitol Hill Rd ¢ Multiple bicycle facility types: separated in- roadway (Corbett: Gibbs - Grover); bicycle Lower SW 1st bikeway -from SW boulevard (all other segments). Includes connection to SW Kelly Ave on SW Grover St and Portland 3038 Barbur Blvd 10 SW Arthur St. SW Corbett Ave ¢ Middle Barbur bikeway -from SW 23rd Portland Ave to SW Capitol Hwy-Barbur Blvd Separated bicycle route in- roadway. Listed as a Regional Bicycle Parkway in the Regional 0007 3044 Ramp. Active Transportation Plan (5/9/13). $ Spring Garden. SW (Taylors Ferry - Portland 3069 Capitol Hwy): Bikeway Provide bike lanes on existing street $ in Portland 3093 Terwilliger bikeway gaps Separated bicycle route in- roadway. Eliminate key gaps in the Terwilliger Blvd bikeway it ri Vermont- Chestnut bikeway -from SW Portland 3101 Capitol Hwy to SW Terwilliger Blvd. Bicycle boulevard it N Tigard N Tualatin 3117 72nd Avenue Dlkeway: 99W to city limits Install bike facilities on both sides of the street from Highway 99W to South City Limits $ O Tigard Lake Z Oswego . 3121 Bonita Road bike lanes: 72nd to I -5 Install bike lanes in eastbound direction from 72nd Avenue to 1 -5 Bridge a v Tigard Fill in gaps in bike lanes along Pacific Hwy -99W within the Tigard city limits. Listed as a 7J ODOT 3128 Pacific Hwy-99W Bike Lanes in Tigard Regional Bicycle Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Plan (5/9/13). ¢ > "1 TI Tigard 3129 Tigard Transit Center Bicycle Hub Provide bicycle hub at Tigard Transit Center ¢ Jai Construct Improvements for transit, bikes and pedestrians. Transit improvements include P mil ortland Barbur Blvd, SW (3rd - Terwilliger): preferential signals, pullouts, shelters, left turn lanes, sidewalks, and crossing ODOT 4002 Multi -modal Improvements improvements. $$ Complete boulevard design improvements Including sidewalks and street bees, safe CD Portland Barbur Bled, SW (Terwilliger City pedestrian crossings, enhance transit access and stop locations, and bike lanes ODOT 5005 Limits): Muhi -modal Improvements ( Terwillger - SW 64th or Portland City Limits). $5$$ VI Improve SW Capitol Highway from SW Multnomah Boulevard to SW Taylors Ferry Road Capitol Hwy Improvements (replace per the Capitol Hghway Plan. Replace Existing Roadway and add sidewalks, bike lanes Ill= IsJ Portland 5009 roadway and add sidewalks) and green stonnwater features. $$$ G Widen to 3 lanes or for transitway including sidewalks and bike lanes between Dartmouth- • ! j Tigard 5024 68th Avenue (widen to 3 lanes) 5 Ramps and south end US Tigard WashCo, Hall Boulevard Widening, Highway 99W Widen to 3 lanes plus on- street parking (or potential 5 lanes), build sidewalks and bike T ODOT 5035 to Fanny Creek lanes; safety improvements $ Hell olF Widening, n McDonald Tigard Street t to Fans Creek including creek Widen to 3 lanes, preserve ROW for 5 lanes; build sidewalks and bike lanes; safety WashCo. 5036 bridge improvements $51 SW 53rd and Pomona (improves safety Reconfigure and improve intersection to manage traffic tuming speeds, and improve safety 8 Portland 5057 of pad /bike users) of ped/bike users between Barbur and Pomona. ¢ °" SW r ad? Crossroads Multi modal Implement Barbur Concept Plan walk audit recommendations wy , and the SW Portland TC, ... Project ect (roadway realignments and including modifications to Barbur Blvd., Capit ol Hwy., end the e I.- on-ramp southbound on -ramp to • Portland modifications to Barbur Blvd., Capitol support safer and more efficient operation for all modes. Project specifics include ODOT 5059 Hwy., and the 1.5 southbound on -ramp) intersection types and roadway realignments to be refined. USE Lake Bonita Rd sidewalks and bike lanes - Oswego 8001 Carman Dr to Bangy Rd. Sidewalks end bike lanes, supplement to Tigard project 63121 which continues to 72nd. it Multmvrah viaduct bicycle end Portland 6003 pedestrian facilities Construct new bicycle and pedeatnan facilities at/parallel to Multnomah St viaduct S iii all Portland 6013 Barbur/PCC ped/bika Connection Neighborhood greenway connection between Barbur and PCC vie SW 53rd. other • Hood Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Portland 6021 (Lane to Macadam) Install sidewalk with barrier along east side and pedestrian crossing at Lane Street. $ • Portland Improve opportunities for bicycles and pedestrians to cross over/under 1-405 on Hewer ODOT 6022 1-405 Bike /Pad Crossing Improvements Drive, Naito Parkway, 1st, 4th, 5th. 6th and Broadway. S Pomona Bic35le and Ped Portland 6026 Improvements (35th to Berbur) provide bike lanes and sidewalks Taylors Ferry, SW (Capitol Hwy - City Limits): Bicycle 8 Pedestrian SW Taylors Ferry Rd: Provide bicycle lanes, including shoulder widening and drainage, Portland 6034 Improvements and construct sidewalks for access to transit. $ Footnotes: 1 - HCT to Tualatin only; 2 - HCT to Sherwood only; 3 - 72nd HCT alignment only; 4 - Hall HCT alignment only; 5 - Naito HCT alignment only; 6 - Barbur/53rd station only Estimated Cost Magnitudes: it - up to $500,000; S - up to $5 Million; $S - up to $10 Million; $SS - up to $20 Million; $$$$ - More than 520 Million Portland ODOT Sherwood Sherwood Tigard ODOT ua atin Sherwood WashCo King City ODOT Barbur Lane Diet - Capitol to Hamilton (reduce northbound lanes from three to 1019 two with muRnmodal im•rovements Arrow Street (Herman Road) - Build 3 1062 lanes with sidewalks and bike lanes Town Center Signal & Intersection 1068 Im•rovements Downtown Sherwood Highway 99W access management in 1129 Ti•ard ualatin- herwoo• • • anger Parkway to Teton Ave.) - Widening to 5 1154 lanes with ped./bike King City Town Center Pedestrian 2001 Improvements Reduce number of northbound lanes from three to two from Capitol Hwy (north) to 1'4 mile south of Hamilton to reduce speeds and improve safety. improve pedbike crossing safety and add •rotected bike lanes Construct new road to collector standards. Build new 3 lane roadway with stream crossing and with bike lanes and sidewalks from Langer Farms Parkway Phase 2 to Garda Lane /Galbreath Dnve Improve 3-leg intersection at Edy & Borchers'. remove traffic signal at Baler. on Sherwood Blvd. remove traffic signal at Langer and disallow left turns from Langer to Sherwood and add traffic signal at Centu Dr. Implement access management strategies and median projects, including additional • destnan crossin• locations, in Hw 99W Plan Widen from 3 to 5 lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks from Langer Parkway to Teton Ave Improve sidewalks lighting. bus shelters and benches and pedestnan crossings for Hi•hwa 99W C 5S 5 5$ $$$S S all other Tigard King City ODOT 99W pedestrian improvements to serve 2070 King City transit stops Provide pedestrian access and crossing opportunities at transit stops on 99W in the vicinity of Royalty Parkway and Durham Rd in King City. C Lake Oswe•o Portland COOT Portland ODOT Boones Ferry Road Boulevard improvements (turn lanes with bike/ped. 5004 - Madrona to Kruse Wa 5006 Barbur Lane Diet Terwilh•: r to Ca •itol Naito /South Portland Improvements (left turn pockets with bike /ped and remove 5013 tunnel, ram •s and viaduct Widen to include bike lanes, sidewalks, and turn lanes. This project is Phase 2, Oakrid•e /Reese to Kruse Wa Phase 1 $23 Million is in Low Build. Reduce number of northbound travel lanes on Barbur from Terwilliger to Capitol Highway (north) from two to one to reduce speed and improve safety. Adds bike lanes over Newborn and Vermont br'id•es. Reconstruct Naito Pkwy as two -lane road w /bike lanes. sidewalks, left tum pockets. & on- street parking Remove grade separation along Naito at Barber Blvd. (tunnel). the Ross Island Brid•e Arthur /Kell viaduct , and the Grover •edestrian bnd• . $$ S$$$ Sherwood Tigard WashCo ODOT Tualatin WashCo Oregon - Tonquin Intersection & Street 5020 Improvements Hall Boulevard Widening. Oleson to 5037 99W Cipole Rd (widen to 3 lanes with 5047 •.d. /bike Intersection improvements (consider roundabout) on Oregon at Tonquin Road, sidewalks and bike access throu•h the intersection. Widen to 3 lanes build sidewalks and bike lanes, safer improvements Reconstructwiden to 3 lanes from 99W to Tualatin - Sherwood Road with sidewalks and bike lanes $ 0 55$ all other Tualatin Herman (mueomodal improvements. 5048 Teton to Tualatin Rd. Im•rove to urban standard from Teton to Tualatin 5 Tualatin Herman (multimodal improvements. 5049 Ci• •le to 124th Reconstruction from Ci•• le to 124th with sidewalks and bike lanes S Lake Oswe•o 6002 Carman Or sidewalks and bike lanes Add bike lanes and •etleslran •:lhwa S Portland ODOT Newbury viaduct bicycle and pedestrian 6004 facilities Construct new bic cle and• - •estran facilities ale•: rallel to Newbu St. viaduct S Portland ODOT Vermont viaduct bicycle and pedestnan 6005 facilities Construct new bic cle and • •destrian facilities at •arallel to Vermont St. viaduct 5$ ,..,�. Sherwood ODOT Sherwood Tualatin 99W - Sherwood TC Bicycle/Ped 6042 Brid•es 9029 Westside Trail segments 9061 Weslsde Trail • Tualatin River Bnd•- Pad /bike underrovercrossings of 99W at Sunset. Meinecke, Edy. Listed as a Regional Bic cle Parkwa in the Re•ional Active Trans•• rtation Plan 5/9/13. rail opportunities within easements o : • • and • or connectivity iste• as a 'egional Bicycle Parkway and Regional Pedestnan Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Plan (5/9/13). New bika teed bridge over the Tualatin Could e a Joint effort with the Willamette River Water consortium. Listed as s R a Regional Bicycle &cy cle Parkway in the Regional Active Trans.. nation Plan 5/9'13. $55 - $ SS -. Location/ Ownership I Project Title DRAFT STAFF RECOMMENDATION Southwest Corridor: Roadway and Active Transportation Projects - 6/3/13 Project Description Highly supportive Highly supportive of of land use goals, Cost HCT anti /prt-p places Durham 6049 Boones Ferry Sidewalks Improve sidewalks and bicycle lane at Boones Ferry to Lower Boones Ferry Provide east -west route for pedestrians and cyclists in SW Portland that connects and extends the existing Fenno Creek Greenway Trail to Willamette Park. Listed as a Regional Red Electnc Trail Fanny Creek Trail to Bicycle Parkway and Regional Pedestnan Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Portland 9005 Willamette Park Plan (5/9/13) Slavin Road to Red Electric Trail Portland 9007 Barbur to Corbett Budd Multi use trail on Stavin Road from Barbur to Corbett . The Red Electric Trail is fisted as a Regional Bicycle Parkway and Regional Pedestrian Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Plan (5/9/13) Complete gaps along the Fenno Creek multiuse path from the Tualatin River to Tigard Fenno Creek Trail - Tualatin River to Library and from Pacific Hwy -99W to Tigard Street Listed as a Regional Bicycle Parkway Tigard 9014 Tigard St. and Regional Pedestnan Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Plan (5/9/t3) Tigard Tualatin 9023 Tualatin River Pathway Develop a continuous mum -use pathway along the I ualahn River from Boones Ferry Hoed under I -5 to the Tualatin River Greenway and Browns Ferry Park. Listed as a Regional Bicycle Parkway and Regional Pedestnan Parkway in the Regional Active Transportation Plan (5/9m13). Portland Ped /Bike Connection between Tigard Tigard 9053 Triangle and PCC- Sylvania Provide pedestrian /bicycle connection between the Tigard Triangle area and PCC - Sylvania Connecting east and west of 15 then north and south to Hwy 99 to 15 bikeway (south) and Tualatin 9057 Nyberg Creek Greenway Tualatin River Greenway (north) Tualatin ODOT 9066 North/South 1.5 Parallel Path in Tualatin Ped,blke pathway $51 S$ $$ Footnotes. I - HCT to Tualatin only, 2 - HCT to Sherwood only, 3 - 72nd HCT alignment only, 4 - Hall HCT alignment only, 5 - Naito HCT alignment only 6 - Barbur/53rd station only Estimated Cost Magnitudes. Q - up to $500,000. $ - up to $5 Million:. $5 - up to $10 Million; $$$ - up to $20 Million, $$$$ - More than $20 Million eiJa /IJ) 6U!M0J.leU putt Sl.SII PaFOJd UOI ;e;JOdsu i; ailpe putt AeMpeoa :v lUaLUy)end ELOZ " S aunt NOISSf1)SIa DISCUSSION DRAFT, June 5, 2013 D Southwest Corridor Plan 4. Water resources projects from 1 and 2, as well as projects that are upstream and Sorting and Prioritizing "Green Infrastructure" Projects downstream from those project locations; Cu May 29, 2013, Janet Bebb and Heather Nelson Kent 5. All regional trail projects from 1 and 2 as well as projects that provide local trail connections As we moved from compiling lists of projects, through screening to evaluation and putting together to those areas within J4 mile of transit alternatives and /or key places. ep implementation plans, a methodology was developed to prioritize the "green infrastructure" projects. In the Southwest Corridor Plan "green infrastructure" projects include parks, trails, natural areas, This revised list will continue to be reviewed by local government and other agency staff to confirm that stormwater facilities, green streets and natural resource enhancements like wildlife corridors and project information is correct and that the screening criteria have been applied correctly. Cu improved culverts for fish passage. Over the past year, a project list was developed with the following 7r steps: Funding for parks, trails and natural resource enhancements will require collaboration and initiative ut Cu Most of the green infrastructure projects will require creative funding solutions. Strategies include grant • The projects identified in park system plans and CIP plans were listed and mapped in each writing (state, regional, federal and foundation) and project prioritization within existing funding sources jurisdiction. This inventory includes approximately 450 projects and is comprehensive. (Park SDC's, SWM funds, etc.). In some communities, voters have been asked to invest in more parks, cu trails and natural areas. Tigard, THPRD and Metro have all successfully secured voter - approval in the • Land use plans were reviewed in each jurisdiction and green projects that will contribute to the success of these plans were added to the list. past to support capital investments in these kinds of projects. N As the transit alignments are further refined, the next step in sorting and prioritizing "green' projects in v • The green technical team comprised of staff from each jurisdiction, reviewed the list and the Southwest Corridor is for partners to examine the likely funding sources and agree to a collective rD identified projects that were more than 15 years away. These were designated as future !L projects and not carried forward. strategy for grant writing and the strategic use of other available or new funds. A refined project list could be developed based on this shared funding strategy. O "Modeling" the benefits of green projects is not practical and providing quantitative evaluation of either individual or groups of projects based on scoring criteria would require far more time and Finally, it is important to note that the "green" project list compiled for the Southwest Corridor does not • resources than the value of those results. In an effort to improve the chances for effective integration of include the numerous impacts and mitigation projects that would be required as a result of a new transit these projects with other investments in the corridor, the Project Leadership Team (PTL) approved a corridor, road and street construction and redevelopment. As more information is gathered on exactly • methodology for refinement of the list that draws on three key assumptions: which land use, transportation and transit projects will be pursued, partners can seek to understand Cu what nearby or adjacent "green" projects are relevant to the type of impacts that may be present. A a • Land use objectives and transportation investments may benefit from complementary green priority should be placed on finding those projects that offer multiple benefits and foster a higher return infrastructure projects. on investment for the public's resources, regardless of the source of those funds. • Natural resource projects have a logic based on natural systems that is distinct from livability or O economic development. There may also be a regulatory framework or regulatory requirements to meet related to these resources. lfl • The cities and jurisdictions that comprise the corridor have the best knowledge of their top priority projects. 3 rD The "green" project list has been refined to include parks, trails and natural resource - related projects Q that are: O 1. Within a % mile of transit alignments alternatives; 0 50 2. Adjacent to and /or within the key places identified in the land use vision (LUV) for the corridor, (for example Tigard downtown); 3. Identified as top priorities by local jurisdictions; 16 1. Funding Amount: Scale of funding for associated projects HIGH - S million and up MEDIUM - 1/2 milion to 5 million LOW - Under 1/2 milion 2. Funding Timing: SHORT TERM: 0-5 years, MID TERM: 5 -15 years or LONG TERM: Beyond 15 years 3. Identified Needs: SERVICE NEED: 10- minute walk of a park trail or natural area DEVELOPMENT COMPLEMENT: Parks trails and natural resource investments can support higher density housing and provide links to transit and neighborhood services. LAND ACQUISITION: Assemble and Acquire large parcels - Parks greater than 5 acres are desirable CONNECTIVITY access to nature both along the trails and by connecting parks and natural areas WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY STREAMS AND RIPARIAN HEALTH WILDLIFE HABITAT WILDLIFE CROSSING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT: LIDIAIs URBAN FOREST Canopy- Trees 4. Project Sian S- SMALL is under an acre. M - MEDIUM is 7 acre to 5 acres. L - LARGE is more than 5 acres Note 1: Projects highlighted in blue are representative of a policy for use in the SW Corridor. Project highlighted with yes responses for Screening Question - Supports Local Land Use Goal. received support front Project Partners as Note 2 complementing land use plans. Generally, these are all low impact, resource preserving projects. Note 3: Projects are generally deemed as having no impacts because they are low Impact, resource preserving projects. Estimated Ig Project # ProjM Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities CITY OF PORTLAND v G The goal is to protect fish and wildlife habitat. water W illamette Greenwa trail quality. scenic resources and improve public access to Yes. Limited MID TERM 5 -15 HIGH -5 milion years C PDX -1 y gaps he river along the greenway from Wilsonville to e Meho Bond years and up MID TERM 5 15 Multnomah Channel. Funds N IA Fanno Creek is one of the acquisrbon targets for Natural Yes. Limited MEDIUM - 12 0 Acquire 58 Acres: Fenno Creek Areas in the Park S f Metr Bond MID TERM. 5-15 million to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 PDX - 2 Watershed o5 n De velopment Charge years AcguisMon 6 Development Plan ter the SW Corridor. Funds y °arc milion Z A westside anHlife corridor is one of the acquisrtio" v Yes. Limited MEDIUM - 12 . Acquire 58 Acres: Weshide Wildlife targets for Natural Areas in the Park System D Metro Bond MID TERM. 5.75 mikon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years PDX 3 Corridor eve o pmenf Charge Acguiaition 6 Development Plan Funds years milion 1 � for the SW Corndor. T Land in the Tryon Creek watershed is one of the MEDIUM - 12 H PDX - 4 Acquire 84 Acres: Tryon Creek acquisition targets for Natural Areas In the Park System Lint Metro MID TERM 5 -15 n to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years 1. Watershed Development Charge Acqusibon 6 Development Plan Bond Funds years milion far the SW Corndor. 3 Implement the 2007 Red Electric Trail Planning Study IFanno Greek Trail through PDX) by developing a No MID TERM 5-15 HIGH - 5 milion 15 years PDX - 5 R ed Electric Trail bike /pod crossing at Barber Bled to the oil SW Slavin years and up MID TERM 5- tJ1 Rd.ROW a Implement the 2007 Red Electric Tree Planning Study NJ PDX- 6 Red Electric Trail (Fenno Greek Trail through PDX) by developing a bike No MID TERM 5 -IS HIGH -5 million MID TERM 5 -15 years friendly connection hen Park Hi Dr, to Willamette years and up Greasy. Implement the 2007 Red Electnc Trail Planning Study MEDIUM - 72 w PDX -7 (Fanno Greek Trail through PDX) by developing SW SHORT TERM SHORT TERM OS RN E lectric iced Yea ninon l0 5 Shattuck to SW Cameron section of RE Trail (protect is 0-5 years. 2013 years funded for SW 30th to SW Vermont). rtNBOn 1 Implementation of the 2007 Red Electric Trail Planning MEDIUM - 12 milion to 5 MID TERM 5-15 PDX - 8 Red Electric Trail Study (Fenno Greek Trail through PDX) • Acquired No MID TERM 5 -15 years . Develop. Wash County Line to SW Shattuck years section or RE Trail million Develop a sustainable trail (soh surface) between Tryon Creek Stale Natural Area and Marshal Perk, end MEDIUM - 1/2 PDX -9 Hillsdale to Lake Oswego Trail contribute to funded BES culvert replacement protect at Yes: Partially SHORT TERM m Moll l0 5 SHORT TERM 0-5 Booties Ferry Road. Arnold and Tryon Creeks. Make -up funded 0 -5 years 2014 milion years short fall to provide for pedestrian passage. Create a new high-density urban communiy while SHORT TERM PDX -10 South Waterfront Graenw ay Phase I supporting the habrtsts along the Willamette River. Yes, Partially 05 years, 2012- HIGH - 5 million SHORT TERM 0 -5 2013 Phase 1 is partially lunged for Rlverward improvements - funded and up years additional funding needed to fnish project. Develop city connections. greenways and corridors. A system of habitat connections, neighborhood greenways MID TERM 5-15 HIGH - 5 million PDX -11 C1IY Greenware and cmc comdors wit weave nature into the city and No years and up MID TERM 5-15 years sustain healthy. ties rent neighborhoods watersheds and Portlanden. PDX -12 �pTERM 515 MEDIUM - 12 III Dickinson Park PPM May. No years rtaWon to 5 MID TERM. 5.15 years million PDX -13 mplemant master plan anon for this underdeveloped MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 Hilledale Park PPBR property N0 years MID to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 years million Implement master plan vision for this underdeveloped MID TERM. 5.15 MEDIUM - 1/2 PDX -14 Spring Garden Park PPBR property. No years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years million PDX -15 age Focus on undeveloped PPaR properties in need of MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 'tentage Tree Park Master Plans and development No years milon to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 years million Focus on undeveloped PP&R properties in need of MID TERM. 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 PDX-1U111111.1111. Mazer Plans one development. NO years Tito 5 MID TERM 5-15 years A6olopo1Daw 6uinnoLieu pee Is!! ;Pafoad seam dean ;eu pus s )1Jed :e ;uewipelly co A6olopoq ew 6UiMoi.ieu pue;sil ppafoad Seale ie.lnjeu pUe Sl.led :$3 lUawLpefld Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Tinting Cost Recommendation Priorities Focus on undeveloped PP&R propemes n need of MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM - PDX -17 SW Talbot Property Master Plans and development. No years million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million Focus on undeveloped PPBR properties In need of MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM-112 PDX -18 SYlvania Park Master Plans and development. No yeas million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million Imlement parks targets for acquisition and development PDX 19 Acquire & Develop 4 acres: So. in the Park System Development Charge Acquisition & MID TERM. 5-15 HIGH - 5 million Waterfront Development Plan Spark deficient areas) for the SW N° years and up M TERM: 5 -15 years Corridor. Imlement parks targets for acquisition and development PDX -20 Acquire & Develop 4 acres: Hillsdale in the Park System Development Charge Acquisition & MID TERM 5-55 MEDIUM - 1/2 Development Plan Spark deficient areas) for the SW No years illion to 5 MID TERM'. 5 -15 years Corridor. million Imlement parks targets for acquisition and development MEDIUM - 1/2 Acquire & Develop 2 acres: John's in the Park System Development Charge Acquisition & MID TERM 5-15 P Landing: Development Plan (park deficient areas) for the SW No years million to 5 MID TERM 5 -75 years Corridor. million Imlement parks targets for acquisition and development MEDIUM - 12 Acquire &Develop 10 acres: .n the Park System Development Charge Acquisition 8 MID TERM 5-15 PDX -22 Southwest- largest gap in service Devel pmeM Plan Spark deficient areas) for the SW No years nap on o 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years Cairo«. inhere Implement Watershed Health Strategy to Reduce SHORT TERM MEDIUM - 172 P DX-23 Watershed Health impervious surfaces and /or retrofit impervious surfaces Yes 0 -5 years 2012- million to 5 Policy to reduce impacts. 2013 million Implement Watershed Health Strategy to manage all MEDIUM - 12 P DX - 24 Watershed Health stormwater runoff from new development and No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing th redevelopment in accordance w the requirements of million the Stormwater Management Watershed Health Strategy - Assess repair and /or replace existing stormwater outfaas along Barbur MEDIUM - 12 PDX -25 Watershed Health Boulevard as needed In particular, outfall repairs and /or No Ongoing molten to 5 Ongoing replacements should be designed so as not to cause million erosion and degradation of receiving streams. PDX -26 Watershed Health Watershed Health Strategy- Restore stream functions No Ongoing M m Non to 5 Ongoing v and stability in planning areas when possible. (^ million n Watershed Health Strategy- Restore habitat connectivity MEDIUM - 1/2 C P DX-27 Watershed Health through revegetation, land acquisition, stream No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing N daylighting. and other methods when possible. million N Watershed Health Strategy - Increase canopy and other MEDIUM - 1/2 O P DX-28 Watershed Health vegetative cover and improve the quality and No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing composition of vegetation including street trees. million Z Watershed Health Strategy - Protect SRas and features MEDIUM - 1/2 0 P DX-29 watershed Health with high watershed value. This could include acquisition No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing 7) easements. or other methods million D lOseign is trneerw+tyfa eta profilist that WI treat T SHORT TERM: Tri -Met Park and Ride Stormwater stormwater runoff on 243 000 square feet of Tri Met MEDIUM - 12 SHORT TERM 0 -5 5 PDX -30 Retrofit property at M 0 years; 2012- e Barbur Boulevard Transit Center. Swales es 2013 and 2013- million to 5 Years will fiber stormwater runoff from parking lots bus shelters 2014 million — and bus lanes. Design is underway for this stream and sewer protection project in the Ash Creek natural area in the Tryon Creek MID TERM. 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 6 DX -31 S. Ash Creek Stream Enhancement watershed. The project will stabilize the channel. protect No years milhon to 5 MIDTERMS -15 years 1 Lri the sewer pipe where R crosses the stream. and improve million water quality. _ Environmental Services Worked with the community to N develop a management plan for the Fenno Creek and 0 Tryon Creek watersheds. The plan recommended project PDX -32 Raindrop Walk Green Street sites to improve water quality, address public interests. MID TERM: 5-15 LOW -Under (/J enhance fish and wildlife habitat, improve infrastructure No years 12 million MID TERM: 5 -15 years 1 and restore watershed functions. The Multnomah Village Raindrop Walk green street is a showcase for green street improvements. Fanno/Tryon Water Duality FacIities. Inlastrucure MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 1/2 PD X 33 Reach 1 Hwy 43 to Iron Mountain protection and stream enhancement No years million to S MID TERM 5 -15 years 1 million PDX -34 Reach 6 Boones Ferry to Marshall Park Fanno/Tryon Water Quality Facilities, Infrastructure Yes SHORT TERM LOW -Under SHORT TERM 0 -5 protection and stream enhancement 0 -5 years; 2012- 12 million years Salmon can reach the existing culvert under Boones SHORT TERM: MEDIUM - 12 PDX -35 Boners Ferry Culvert Retrofit Ferry Road but cannot get over the obstruction there. Yes 0 -5 years; 2012- million to 5 SHORT TERM'. 0 -5 1 BES has put the culvert replacement project into its 2013 million Years Capital Improvement Plan for design. Replace culvert as part of larger project to upsize area MEDIUM -512 Fan no em CIP #86 45th Avenue Culvert SHORT TERM. SHORT TERM' 0-5 PDX -36 Replacement pipe segments. and install stormwater controls to relieve Yes 0 . 5 million to S p street flooding and basement sewer backups. years million years - Part of a group of projects to implement the recommendations of the Fanno/Tryon Watershed Plan and the objectives of the TMDL Projects include acquisition of land to protect watershed functions. construction of stormwater fecilitiee to treat runoff from MEDIUM - 12 Tryon 1 -5 at SW 26th WO Facility C imperious surfaces including right-of-ways and major SHORT TERM. SHORT TERM: 0-5 PDX -37 48679 commercial concentrations. retrofit/replacement of Yes 5-5 years million to 5 years culverts to increase capacity and provide fish passage. million rehabilitation /replacement of degraded stormwater outtalk, stabilization of eroding steam banks. and daylighSng of stream segments currently encased in pipe. Jackson MS Storm Daylightieg & SW SHORT TERM'. MEDIUM - 12 SHORT TERM. 0-5 P Retro CIP #8680 Stream daylighting and stormwater management Yes as years mdbon to s years 1 PDX -39 Tryon Spring Garden Stream Stream daylightlng and stormwater management Yes SHORT TERM LOW - Under SHORT TERM 0 -5 Daylighting TIP x8681 0-5 years 1/2 million years MEDIUM - 12 stormwater Outfall Maintenance TIP SH. PDX-40 *8677 outran ooutran n maintenance nance and repair Yes TERM. SHORT TERM 0 -5 res 0-5 years million to s years million Fanno/Tryon Water Quality Facilities CIP A8687 Stormwater management es SHORT TERM. MEDIUM - 12 SHORT TERM 0 -5 PDX 41 0-5 years migion to 5 years Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Protect Descnption Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities Design bean in seep 2010 for stemmata • • M EDIUM WORT Muhnomah Ms Confer West Parking lae b end nUnagnnt.s den d heal nova from• SHORT TERM: ORT TERM: 65 P DX-42 Lot 50.0001a.a. of nprvioue area et re MullnaMh V e 0-5 s r 5 rear+ 1 Beaverton lre.4r M41aaaF 0/5Ynge SH TERM: MEDIUM -1R SHORT TERM. GS PDX-43 improvement 04 n anagelrwet .. oa ywe mew as yarn 3 . Address * eale agmd mate t o.nldarn by imaging a • drone rani an approplaNa hea0,.bees and shrubs to • Ike Wan Interim are not ' ' • Por ..dj acent to Ash Creek NaturalA Community College's roman significant .e. MD TERM 5-15 MEDIUM PDX-44 Dover. Moires. too wlagn atiw s.getYed oonder: No as a S MD TERM 5-15 year • area adjacent years Creole warm nel meadows hut not Was expense a mass nagoln - . • 15040 in bee mew momncron Yong loo corddot. • Wain s 'Paw Noentanfing prams- . • . . . . ne . Address *agmerNd wgaae eorlaas by nelaiq a' .. . • averse mile otWeappropriar ha trees and shrva to • • _ r Weste rn end of the A "'"" CRS" *Awlfhrrae are not signaeaa gaps n tree SHORT TERM: MEDIUM -12 • •. PDX-45 oorria sera . Mamtr a elneOWN revgseradcandor. • Yea . 65ymars:'2012•.• Milos !WS SHORT TERM: 0.6 ' Cradle oowdnal meadows but • not r re expense of mie . 2013 • mien years • Maine agap i * se coyer cairre0o0 sienna* tonna. • • ' ' n .. • Sleh&5 0.4.melon uWg hln.ngneaing pr ac.o. - . . • Address fragmented Matte anion by instllgng a • . averse mar mrr • a.pprpue. herbs; ten and shrubs to • • • • . • The nerds treed aye between Ash too anent w not signakant gaps In tree . SHORT TERM: MEDIUM -12 O P DX-46 creek Maw* Ara and Wood. corer, Mar in r WW1 ah are vegetated corridor. Yes 04 yeah: 2012- moos b5 1111°" TERM: 6 5 1111° Manorial Natural Ara Pale occasked meadows Ma not at the expense of . 2013. milkn baying a gap n *n ewer Yong Me corridor. . 0105055 .5ereien Mg bioengineering practices. . Address *agmisebd arab candor. by installing a • • • • warse mat aalr..ppeopale herb., Irma and shunt() Corridors between Woods Manna ra Wan bathers are not significant gaps In tree MD TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -12 P DX-47 Nacre' Ares to Gabriel and 00114111 war. Mauls. IM Witt of the vegetated corridor. • Yes mace to 6 MD TERM 615 years Parke Creels occasional mono* but not at re expennse of Yeas • mean • Mang a gap in Uncover commotion along the eorddor, Q 5rb#ca 04 ef.alen wing M.ee moors g praaken.. • N Cale., tram Rtwrrsw Cemetery • Adds. fryminid WM. oanders try Willa a n e.aloan,,thn.p.rtwrror.ar diverse ink Ceamy:praarr haft, trees and shrubs b C fM dieage Man.a P.rR ibl T•r•r55wr the wank VW Were w not ognricara gps n M SNORT TERM MEDIUM -112 SHORT TERM: 6b N PDX 4 8 2.1114/111'1' tore. deed min We Yaa6t vemated • candor. Yes 0.5 mars; 2012- neon te 5 N p� Maroaan Nalum P1rk Cr Weaken meadow not a the amens* a 2013 mires P .11 eeM une s Cagerest ON ntlralp Footer Mainp agep in the cover eonrwento • Pak +long re emitter. 0 Stabile eel 'melon using g p eerin eaces• . ng g Z • • 0relisilayotocept idea forbiprnwn6ng neighborhood woo TERM: 615 MEDIUM ' 111 v • PDX -49 Park site behind Fred Meyer ps'k for prepaid Inenased aneay r bane was n Na Neon to 6 MD TERM: I.10 yew 0 eaha gaaaM.ra nor. mate . P DX -50 teak ale ballad p''s noop y commit for n. +nrolanlew neighborhood MEDIUM - 112 D w+' MID M TERM: 5-15 Sanaa park to imposed increased b n wreased density M ats areas No nation toff MID TERM: 615 ran -tai 1110111110411O1114 Yen mike SHORT TERM .ME0I1M -12 P SHORT DX -51 SW Sand Mwka knood areeneray Pew. sae Pwa .bw*gw fealties tor a r coawNp 0-5 mere; 0ere; 2012- mew to 5 TERM: 65 2013 • maMan 211 C Sidewalks. Street M, end Omen Wynn/ Mar. tensile Men Inn item sidewalks, LOW Under P -52 a wr Streets in SW - gren ysforb.aa and No ag°"F ' - 12mron Ong01no a/ Menem ttnnstated aMyert OOFW D i07 n Bel Creak MD TERM: 5.15 MEDIUM - 12 ' VI PDX -53 Remove Fish Earner wars subtype is Ma , No tow Wien le 6 MD TERM: 545 years mica — N • Remove wawa carat ODFW D OW llranawn - O passage dale. Mader subtype is riot,' Culver • 5012 1.11 P DX -54 Ramove FahM"rr 'p0 as "a't No 000 TERM: rrfwr5 MD TERM 5.15 years • W sad cans loJasmi ewpang&Careranorn years • *again. chat Lobo 25 rra es h.en.. paler velocity salon her. . . • Ran.4 warned euMi 00P0/10 024 on lewd MEDIUM 112 . P DX -55 Renew Fish Barrier Creek Passim is bloated. Bader subtypes No MIDTERM: 610 W b M on 5 D TERM 6 a 16 yes m roa'Pnwawnrwgmentvasusedtowant ao ens M POW Wert learned al SW LlaMa. Rd. It N 1.3M wanes. Remove aortal cant ODFW D M25 on Batt Fork PDX -56 Remove Fish Barrier Ash Crest gainer subtype s unlearnt. Parable MID TEAM: 610 maw MEDIUM UY maw 1Q w to 5 MD 61 TERM 5 yeas passage stars. Pt.laYnYjtsdpnwM vas used r No yon min woken Bas Most located as SW 60*. Remove woad coat OOFW ID W on South Fmk MFOMIY- 112 R emove Fish Barrier A sh Creak SarW MD TERM 6/S PDX -57 siege is unknown. Pr l..lnr No alien es 5 MD TERM: 615 men y dapnena ad a evaluate advert years ye a mass Rant* seamed annum ODF W D 02* an seat PDX -58 Remo. Fish Barrier Fork Aela Crack Bann lyre is an awned sewer pipe' No MID TERM 545 mita W MC TERM: 545 year Po** bloded passage Maus. Praarn.l a years two teed le wrest gin Wear. PAM Rason pmarnd skeane OOFW D 031 on Sean Fork MA Creak PasaMe passage Arta Palmettos' MO TERM 615 MEOIa/r- PDX -59 Remn.Fish earr »r pagnawnnor evaluate * w. Conant tot No yeas adM.ars M0Teub6lsy.a. d used sem Mane an M/ ef area IAN L.Wads&- sales Roane wawa advert CORM D 033 on hour Fork PDX-60 Remove Fish Border Ate Creek PaYsty braced postage earns No MD TERM 615 Wiles le 5 MD TEAM: 610 yeas p'reres'eaalMlara yea and b webs* this diver Yeas neon 11814 Cast 15s 0.115*05 dasunpata Ramon lataaned sawn DORM D 034 an Sate Fork MEDIUM -1Q PDX -61 Remove Fish Banal Ate Creek. Pwaale Forage loin. Proleseionel MD TERM big Myrtaawwadle Overretwatnwa No Years b D s M TERM 6 ye 15 ns n ■ lidim pert ` Ream renamed coked OOFW D 015 an Tryon Creek MEDIUM -1Q P DX-62 Remove Fah eerier No ms D P rrsEy blocked Pahomage Arles. Barrios ettsubtype 0. b D M TERM: 5.15 s le S M TERM: 615 y ews ,end.' PleanelsM aaw b juda used evaluate the yeas alien advert M SW Maple Crest Or. I is 1.7m read. /(6olopoq i.aw 6uinno.faeu pue is!! ppafoid seaae leanleu pue sued :8 lueWL )el]d o rtholopoy;aw 6uinnoaaeu pue Isis prod seaae lean;eu pue shed :a luaw43e .iid • P roject # Project Title /Location p C ool Jurisdictional P ro reject Description Funding Funding Timing Cos! Recommendation Priorities Remove nnnsnred culvert OOFW 10 Fay on Tryon Creek. MEDNAI -.112 Passable pssstre stars. Error subtype k hound' ' • . MD TERM: 5.15 . PDX -63 Remove Fish tarter Professlonet judgment was used to rehire the culvert • ' • N • . yew. • • • million to 3 MID TERM: 5715 rats • it SW 16th Pt 11 Mt.7m metal. ° .. • • Remove unarmed cured OOFW ID 145 on Woods . • 1rz • P DX-64 Remove Fish Berrir Creek Blocked pomace stylus. Bonier subtype le ' . .. • MW TERM: 5.15 • • • Nomaen ro s MD TERM: •116 • e�e . Wort' PreM1.Manel judgment was wed to.vaoa. this yeen _ Curet at EW Taylors Ferry Rd. Si, 0.6m petal. • Remove unnamed r.d 00FW ID 060 on Tryon Creek . MEDIUM: 112 - Re Fish Barrier Parable . MID 71311713111••545 m P DX-65 primps Benner subtype this .& ia'reu culvert • NO 6 elon to s MO TERM s t6 yara • Prohmelrol Jiggtwnt tee wed to err culvert • • • mire . . Reson ermined t. ured culvert OOFW D Mt on Tryon Crook .. MEDIUM -112 . • R emove Fish Barrier Pt.tahlt MDTERM: 5-15 • • P DX-66 preegt Ctrs. aarder unbOPe M'r',nl' No neon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 rears • PrNNsle..Ij dgant era used b whirs this culvert . NN melon • • • Rearm rmeered whorl DORM D S64 on Ash •,..k • • MEDIUM MEDIUM -112 • • • PDX -67 Remove Fish Barrier server see ear* te lewd: ReMSiaeird rare tea MD TERM 5-15 used le ewrle Ws mint at SW 56th. R le 0.em No _ melon b 3 • MD TERM: 316.yeare commie. - niiEan ReaeveMawred mind ODFWDI6IonMhCruet - IIEOIUY -112 - PDX -68 Remove Fish Bro rr NKr* is Prolsrorrr wee #1113 MIO7 5-15 Order 6 niwb6 MD TERM 6.16 yens used M ember this culvert et aW Lawroler. S is 0.7m aye t Remo. warred Weed°DPW D IBM en Falling MDTERM: 6.16 MEDIUM -1/2 . . PDX$9 Remove Fish Barrier Greek Berner turps %tort' No yMS oleo to MD DOW: 5-16 mere . waken • Remove rammed advert COM D 610 on Falling MD TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -112 PDX -70 Remove Fish Barrier Creek Sayre a is No . yews trim b6 MID TERM: 5-15 years plan Re ewe Amore/ 11101011110 OOFW D 062 on Aar • • Creek Patrol, Mocked passe. MMus. Barrir tree te MEDIUM .112 R emove Fish Barrier en !Sip. TERM: 5-IS PDX -71 elroeed leer pyre Protewiertrjudgrerd 1w. used No � � Mllon b S' MD TERM: 5.16 yore . . rewrite Nis MUekln. Crmmemt says, "step lAag.4Sm • lnilon . rmssed eswr PNe areeebs,• . Rearm wormed wren mow D 153 on Woods . Creek Blocked pee stark Barb subtype M MD TERM 5-15 M lelloe -112 Q PDX -72 Remove Fteh Bawler No . million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years bond.' Prote.Na . It is O ntnt ear 6666.16 wrote 666 ,sere males n whole r SWOP. E is 0.Fn meld • Remove Unformed oivel ODFW D d64. Unknown • .. MID M TERM: 5-IS MEOrAI.1R PDX -73 Remove Fish Bas, No . matron to r em g MID TERM: 5-16 yea C • rd pro NON farrier wMype is 'rou 0.' Yr^ n V1 Remo unnamed cared O0FW D 685 on Ash Creek. ve MEDIUM -172 • PDX -74 Remove Fish Battler Barer subE s is'rand: t et SW nrjudgment VAN MD TERM: 5-15. melon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 )Fars O used b evaAM. red culvert et BW Orahk Dr. It 12m y ears mWea Z • • Remove rimmed wulred DORM D OM en Ash Creek . • PDX -75 Remove Fish Bards Mme subtma is 'ro 'round: Pr.Mstlnrljudgment was MD TERM 5 • MEDIUM - 112 Q N o mRiod to MID TERM: 5-15yesre used b evaluate tar e s culvert M t r SW Dolph. 1.00 7ed+ rMkd 23 .verse. _. • .. > R.mM unnamed calved DORN D 167 on Woad m • PDX -76 Remove Fish Barrier cork gamed / MAP. Is 'mond.'PrahoManNprgrent was red le wrhiie Ws area $W Orden erne Rd. MDTERMM: 5-16 MEN 5 MID TERM: 5.16 years • ndMr1 . IM 1.50 may, • w armer routed wrist CORY D 865 on Vsmttnt • C Crew. MSir eaaM* M Taint' Prolaakmrljueirwst 14D TERM 5-15 MEDIUM -1/2 PDX -77 Remove Fish Barrier err wed le evaluate this w e a verr eennralwe Indus." Mn melon b 5 MD TERk1: 5.15 year i D "end et wives r. Never wrote 0.66m concrete no y'r melon +rev U1 Reserve wnemed erne ODFW ID Irk WON 88041e0 N W recked: 001141 aa tsr Is MOT. Curare aseassrt by CONS Orr (tp6 -1080) using g0dsiwe and atria Is IA) MD TEiM[Sts MEDIUM 0 PDX -78 Remove Fish Bartley M.rmi lre f.hyass sr. ceewrar kr t ckrdr, "not on No melee toy MD TERM: 6.16 yews W s/aWIS err . eh 0.4 miles very e!Oerard Br. 4' tills y ' e ' t melon Move evert Cap word below %peel's to be velocity Molar • (MOW Park psenwn relgodom4cab upgrade: eeyoelts or opacity red rotten el wire" sear and SHORT TERM: LOW - Under PDX -79 Custer Park Pollrb./te dseren Face, pod sealed long Custer Corr Curer Park to No 1 Myrenr 1101111010W so less and reuses. use. BES: 0-5 years 12 mlwn Project 5.212014 CP- $230.000 Stephens Marro Pork rive droller and wetland enhancement omruct Menton rarity M Stephens Creek PDX -80 ntea Dm* Now. Pea 0pmtiame elne. nl with 2005A Funnctio M SHORT TERM ma 1 mien and Welland geilMa for Stephens Croak Now Perk and pleated 2513 tray yews main Impmvsmanp, Bag: Project 31.10,512014 CF - • $754000 Rs. property wellend d.tern fediiy detention and stream Mrrn0 construction I undwroped property at SHORT TERM: MEDIUM -1rz PDX -81 Raz Wetlands the hemdwaters at reprint Creek BES has • signed • No .. miler ie 6 contract In place to purchase this dy. ds props SEE Project , ' years million 24.6/2014 Cg - $1,030,000 . • Greater Portend Bible Church neighborhood teddy an PDX -82 Greater noon fa Bible Church opportunity , oreb *ye met No SHORT 6 yews : LOW "umd r • Portend Belo Church- K6: Peojaet 6.11531 CIP 2014 . Repel/ and enhancement of IT pubic and private MEDIUM .112 PDX -83 Stephens creek Tributaries outlet remarry and Ruby Coe es on River River ViwsnM. . • N6 . , SHORT melaar s y "lea Project A:P 2014 - $x60,000 Provides a flexible moons to construct 'tornwirer MEDIUM - 12 PDX -84 Right Reticle Shell retrofits tome existing system on streets identified as No SHORT TERM nation to S high- pnordy for detention and/or and pollution reduction. 0 -5 years melon 1 -5. BES. Project / CIP 2011 - 81,000,000 SW Irminger Shred Orentlon SHORT TERM COOT Shared ONent R.4..1., n e Poon Reductl LOW -Limier pry, SW Terris', shared detention rarity. BES M 0.3'Mars in elan r 1 Projse1,23.1 CIP 2017 .7220.000' Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Prolext trtle !1 ocation Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities ODOT Shared Detention and Pollution Reduction Fulton Park Neighborhood Wetland Facilities - Fulton Park neighborhood wetland facility SHORT TERM: LOW - Under PDX -86 Facility adjacent to the community garden. BES Project 21.2b/ N0 0-5 years 12 million $ GIP 2015 - $470,000 ODOT Shared Detention and Pollution Reduction MEDIUM - 12 PDX -87 A -Boy Plumbing neighborhood Facihties - A -Boy Plumbing neighborhood detention No SHORT TERM million to5 detention facility facility adjacent to 1-5 in existing low point. BES: Project 0 -5 years million 21.1a/ CIP 2015 - St. 280,000 ODOT Shared Detention and Pollution Reduction Stormwater fitter vault at ODOT Facilities - Starmweter filter vault at ODOT right -of -way. SHORT TERM. LOW - Under PDX -88 right -of -way which can treat both 1.5 runoff. city streets. and private No 0 -5 years I/O million $ property. BES Project 23.2/ CIP 2015 - $500.000 Local z lormwater treatment facilities on ODOT Shared Detention and Pollution Reduction SHORT TERM: LOW - Under PDX -89 I -5 overpasses Facilities - Local stormwater treatment facilites on 1-5 No o -s years rz million 1 overpasses. BES'. Project 23.3/ CIP 2015 - $110.000 ODOT Shared Detention and Pollution Reduction PDX 90 Rain gardens for bioremediation of F$ Facilities - Rain gardens for bioremediation of 1-5 outta$s No SHORT TERM. LOW - Under 1 out/alls adjacent to Stephens Creek. BES: Project 25.5/ CIP 0 -5 years 1/2 million 2015- $140,000 Stephens Creek Tributaries Habitat Restoration - River View Tnbutery— improve near -stream habitat this project will improve habitat conditions in the stream by restoring PDX -91 River View Tributary Improvements in-stream habitats and wetlands, and improving habitat connectivity through bank layback, and installation of large wood. It will improve the diversity of native plants in the npanan area. BES. Project 9.3a/ CIP 2015 - $260,000 Stephens Creek Tributaries Habitat Restoration - River River View neighborhood scale wetland View neighborhood scale wetland facility, this project will PDX -92 facility enhance wetlands associated with River View and Taylors Ferry tributaries to improve habitat peak flows, and water quality. BES Project 9.5/ CIP 2015- 567,000 v Stephens Creek Tributaries Habitat Restoration - Lin Crestline Creek —improve near - stream habitat this n project will include removal of invasive plants and C vegetation with native plants, improvement of near - PDX -93 C restlina Creek Stream Improvements stream habitat, and educate and encourage property owners to remove invasive plants and re- populate with paan vegetation along the Cresdine Creek riparian norndor. including the area along the surtace channel near the headwaters. BES'. Project 12.4 /CIP 2015 - Z $40.000 Stephens Creek Tributaries Habitat Restoration - Ruby Creek—improve near - stream habitat this project will locus on education and outreach to encourage property J� PDX -94 Ruby Creek Stream Improvements ors to ov reme invasive plants and re- populate vegetation with native plants and riparian vegetation �{ along the Ruby Creek riparian corridor to where it flows into the mainstem Stephens Creek. BES. Project 19.3/ CIP 201S- $22,000 • C Stephens Creek Tributaries Habitat Restoration - This shell wit fund projects that mitigate stormwater runoff Ui from existing impervious surface on pnvate property or create stormwater assets not owned and operated by N BES. The Private Property Partnership Shell is intended 0 as a flexible means to inceetivize stormwater projects on private properties that help cost-effectively meet BES's PDX -95 Private Property Partnership Shell stormwater system improvements needs. This could include funding larger facilities than would otherwise be required by the SWMM or construction of habitat and restoration projects in natural systems that are impaired by runoff from the BES stormwater system. BES Project BWRF.2/ Select projects for CIP 2015 - $2.007,000 850,000 for commercial property retrofits with ecoroof and pervious pavement. Headwaters Stream Enhancement and Daylighhng - Fulton Park stream daylighting, there is an opportunity to daylight the piped stormwater runoff in Fulton Park to the PDX -96 Futon Park stream dsylighting adjacent historic channel (Miles Creek). which would ultimately lead to improved habitat and biological communities, The runoff would be attenuated and treated before returning to the pipe and being conveyed under 1 -5. BES. Project 32.1 /CIP 2017 - $860.000 Headwaters Stream Enhancement and Daylighting - Improve in- stream habitat at Cloverleaf Apartments, this project consists of restoration work at the Clover Leaf reach of the Stephens Creek mainslem. This project should consider the presence or hydric soils and work to improve connectivity of the stream to springs and remnant floodplain elevations. Riparian and in -stream PDX -97 In- stream habitat improvements at restoration yell include bank layback where downcuning Cloverleaf Apartment has occurred. instaleton of large wood complexes to create small in- stream pools addition of coarse sediment metenals to improve in- stream habitat. Riparian enhancement wall include replanting with riparian and emergent vegetation. Reconstruct discharge outtalls from building and parking stormwater runoff to enhance floodplain function. BES: Project 31.4/CIP 2017 - $471.000 A6olopoti}aw 6ulmoiieu pue 43efo.id seaae lean;eu pue s)aed :8 }uaunpe} ;y N 1 6OlOpOtilaW 6U!Mo.0 U pUe 1SH ppeFoid SpalE leanleU pup SlJed :8 �UaUJI♦�pUV Project # Project Tae /Lo cation Project Description CoomgW Jurisdictional Po Priorities f 1 } ptlon FumWap Funding Timing Coq R.eemanndrtion Priorities s Headwater Stream Enhaneemoot od Daytgh8ng • . Capitol Hilo Coedos stream it glighting; Work wit prhiate . PDX -98- Capitol l H. Condos .dreara day6phlinp progeny owner to remove piped /Lector of Stephens Geak mniugh'ma Gondoaompbz Replace witlm restored stream chernet and adjacent riparian area. BES: Projaq 24. &CIP 2017 - $1',470,000 Heedvaaere StreamEnhNCemem andOaylghbng- ShadowHi7s Apatinente stream enhancement restura8un work.title Shadow Hits reach of Stephens Creek abuuN conaiderTe presence of hydnc soils and : r' work to knprove'oonneethetyottha stream tb springs and rarmanHloodplein etwa8ons (present or created). Riparian and in•siream restoration of the Shadow HIM � ' PDX -99 . Shadow Hills Apartments stream teach of Stephens Creek will include bank layback where . ... enhancemen - dovmcultcg has occurred, aratllatton of large wood. coeplaxec to mate emal rem -stream poets, addibon of coarse aenitma t materials to improve ITstream habitat: Rgedee eeheocemeel vit include replanting with . .. . riparian and efeergeelvegetaaon: Reconstructd scharge - oVilaNB irafi butdlag and parking stormwater ranotl to en raeoe leodphb function: BES: Project 24.9/ CIP 2017 ' ..$470.000' . . .: Headweter.StreamEnhencemertt'andDeyflghkng- Taylors Ferry improve in- stream habitat add in- stream PDX - 100 Talton Fer improve In -stream haheart cow for aquatic orgeres m and to stabt ze banks. This' - .project is adantlad te meet the akematiye themes to. , . ' . .. . .. emphtmlae biobgicei'ccmmunNes a� habibP - . .. .. ... resteretoe. BES; Project 29,3d/ CUP 2017;- $1.080,000, Remove.exbamp collets under Highway 43 end replace nth a larger cgvat/apeo and restore naprat substrate to Sleph.ns Creak. Remove boreswe spedee (English ivy. PDX -101 R•pp.• . Macadam CUMrt end HtrsliSfsn blackbarty) and Want restive riparian vsgatatronptle c0ne0tly degraded bulhrr YOnea' v between Macadam cad Stephens Creek ktcreaee in- strewn habtN Sri copped bantric invertebrates end t/$ native tleh BES:. Project 29.1/. CIP 2017- $440,000 ,.. n PDX -102 1-ay aekbenke BurtngnM reach w Yback baMis Balmgame .roach. BES;26te /No CIP .. .. N idenmtlllad 5334,000 . PDX -1 VJ r se avoo.am hWftatStrangenw improve inatream Burlingame reech,BES 25.1c/. PD9(-1 W etdranwnat ew . z t a emacst ie 7r dame reach. BES. Project' .. .. . .. 1 Z SM Can Ff RweKto Stephens Canyon 45 Runo6 to Willamette or Combined PDX -105 System System. BES: Project 26.1, 28:1$/ No CUP Identified at .. 1 � WitlmmMNOr ComblaW 6tls tlme - $/.089,000 . � � � .. � .. PDX -106 MauseteumTributary property Mwsolewe Tdbidary property Inquisition BES: Project . . ' . . . ' • -I esqulatllnes 27.4 CIP N emiAe d at tlts time - . .. .. .. PDX-10 / Maueopum mom, acg hation " Mauaokrum Hmtr property aogulsdinn BES: Project 27.61 No ClP idem atlmh tl me•$851.000 wa1Md aMUeannt Bedngane Wetland t 1. eme Bmapi reac separate .. m • PDX -108 kr�. son- fnpiangarepagotPOx- 1o4, BE3:Projaet 1 27.31 NO CIP itlsrdM.a gtlmb tlme- $67,000 .. t11 PDX -109 Ma ee sum p.perb rawwta0ne Mausoleum pmpety revegetatlon. BES: Project 21.40/No . . . . . . CIP id.ntdlsdgmis tbmre- $181,000. O PDX-110 ' TRAMS pay etroon daylgeobmg Taylors Ferny sbean Myaghling. BES' Project28.3bMo GlP gantlMdatMro tlme- fl.;3�,000 . .. (�/ PDX -111 ` Taylnre Ponyouhnrt replacement Tayloor Ferry culvert replacement BEt:Project 28.3e Mo C�gertlMd ggdstims- $326,000'. Natural it° ladder *am Hwy43 Natural Ash bidder above. Hwy 43 Unmet BES: Project PDX -112 • oulveet 28.3c INo ClP idsntllNd atlas lime - $1,318,000 PDX-1 1 Maoalam Srmprew near. hgttat.. Macadam improve near -*.am habitat KS: Project zs .5meclPw.rmllwgtnieam.- $ies,000 ' Boone Ferry neighborhood detention 2.1b Boones Ferny neighborhood dapntion pond. BE$: PDX -114 Pond Preject2,lb/NO CIPtdenbtled at this 0me- $405,000 .. PDX -1 h Cemetery Improve. lowtream River View w a .a st min m. • $t $72000 PDX -116 aIe.m«nooee.aasnyfarcall F ny tributary. Projject4MocP denen.dgtthis tkne -ltc ccq eetlmete at this time: Large wend teetalgbn; mweives large wood astaWtlone inoeeives control and PDX -1 17 v. control and reg.tatl n on In Stephens revegetatonin Stephens Canyon. BES: Project 26.2040 -. Canyon CUPIaen88etl at tie time- $880.000. pax-118 SW Evan neighborhood fsapltn Ever mghberhood fae*8.a. BES: Project 17.3040 ' GW idenBMdMBdstlme- $828,000. .. ': ` . PDX -11 T rgheo OUOT $ 55.000 Eimprove S' Project 23.4a/No C habitat identified p DX -120 BW Taws 1par improve to -stream ? SW Terwtugerimprove watrearn habitat BES: Project r - ' : : ha itaa 23. 4blNoCtP.idemMedetalstlme- $d19,000 .. DDX-121 bviprom near-etnann habitat Clever Improve near-stream habitat Clover Lear Apt. BES LMtApt...' Pro jest 31.3040 CIP Idenhhed at thistime - $2.000 PDX -122 spobmp Creek 'Moffat restoration Spring Creek Owlet restoration. BES' Project 24.10/No . CIP ldentlted of tlds tlme- $3,000 1 t� 2 Rat Trans/m(41i n ao str eam Rea . da Traeportatlon ac ytghting, LUST PDX -123 ' Gpe nwp. B E 8 : P rotec t 31:2a, b, c04o CIP idantlflad at dey Claanup -. this tlrM.- $1.341.000 :„„,„ m daytehenp is BEhet Project 2 5 1nd No CIP M g t Burtln reeeh. . PDX -124 BES: Proj.ct25.m /tee cIP idennfiea q this time - slas.000 PDX -125 Enpamd and enhance. Tests Wetland Expand and enhance Texas Wetland. BES: Project 3.1 Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities PDX -125 Fulton Park revegetallon Fulton Park revegetation. BES: Project 32.3 /O CIP 1 2014 - $36.000 PDX -126 Restore historic channel at Miles Creek Restore historic channel at Mlles Creek. BES Project 1 26.7 /on hold In WIF - $437,000 Real time control. etormwater retrofit at Real time controls stormwater retrofit at Burlingame Fred PDX -127 Burlingame Fred Meyer and nearby Meyer and nearby apartments. BES: Project 32.3 /No apartments CIP eatified at this time - $76,000 PD X - 127 Mausoleum Retrofits Mausoleum Retrofits. BES: Project 27.1.27.2/No CIP identified at this time - $55,000 Curb extension retrofits on PBOT BWRF.1 Curb extension retrofits on PBOT high-priority high - priority streets streets BES: Project BWRF.1 We CIP identified at this 1 time 44,565,000 Select projects identified for CIP 2014 extension retrofits on all W BWRF.2 Curb extension retrofits on a1 right- of-way. BES: Curb PDX -129 Curb of -way Project BWRF.2 /No CIP identified at this time 523,386,000 PDX -130 Basin wide tree planting Basin wide tree planting. BES: Project BWRF.4/ No CIP identified at this time - E1.660,000 Apt Retrofit (Spring Creek, Shadow HINs Apt Retrofit (Spring Creek, Shadow Hills and Capitol Hill). PDX -131 and Capitol (Zing project 24.5. 51,602,000 NO CIP identified at this time. PDX -132 Retrofits ill School and St Claire Church project iill1. 82, 53,000 NO TIPCden et this t ame. PDX -133 St ormwater retrofit at Hillsdale Stormwater retrofit at Hillsdale Community Church. BES Community Church project 3.4. $668,000 NO CIP identified at this time CITY Of TIGARD Woodward Park to Grant ( partially funded), Grant to MEDIUM - 12 TI -1 Fanno Creek Corridor Trail (17) Main ( paniaNyfunded ), Planning and Acquisition, MORE Yes; Partially SHORT TERM million to5 SHORT TERM: 0-5 important funded 0 -5 years million Years SHORT TO MID MEDIUM - 1/2 TI -2 Fenno Creek Corridor Trail (T11) Trail link from Tigard Public Library to Milton Court/Bonita SHORT TERM 0 -5 Road No TERM: 0 -15 million to 5 years years million MEDIUM - 1/2 TI -3 Fenno Creek Corridor Trail (T6) Trail link from Fenno Creek /Tigard Street to Tigard Yes. Partially SHORT TERM million to 5 SHORT TERM 0 -5 v Transit center funded 0 -5 years million years ■ N MEDIUM - 1/2 F enno Creek stormwater Stormwater and Yes; Partially SHORT TERM: SHORT TERM: 0 -5 n TI-4 protection of trail funded 0 -5 years million to 5 years 1 million C Acquisition and development of urban plaza for • N downtown Tigard, The Downtown Plaza was designed to til SHORT TO MID MEDIUM - 1/2 Fenno Creek Park: Urban Plaza meet the need for community gathering space for Ves, Partially SHORT • TERM 0 -5 O TI -5 TERM: 0-15 millionto5 1 events and everyday use. and the goal of initiating funded years redevelopment under a new Urban Renewal District years million Z approved in May ef' Establishes the "Green Heart' identified in the Tigard 0 F enno Creek Downtown Downtown Improvement Plan by locating the primary MID TERM. 5 15 MEDIUM - 1/2 TI -6 No - million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years open space and plaza between Downtown and the years community's unique natural resource - Fanno Creek. million T ualatin River Corridor Limit pollution a e native vegetation MID TERM 5 -15 HIGH -5 million years T TI-7 in riparian zon N. years .... P MID TERM: 5-15 108th Avenue Grading and Existing Trail Improvements, MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM - 1/2 TI -8 Tualatin River Trail 108th Avenue to Pacific Highway Extension No Years million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years million MEDIUM -12 (I) TI -9 Tualatin River Water Trail CWS, Bruce Rol No MID TERM. S15 Years million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years Ul miMon TI-10 Ash Creek Corridor Limit pollution a SHORT TERM: : 0 -5 in riparian zone Yes 0 -5 years: 2012- 1 NJ 0 2013 million TI -11 Washin Square Trail Loop complete in THPRD. Fanno Creek to Highway No LONGTERM: HIGH -5 million LONG TERM: Beyond lAJ Conneotio n/Washington Square Loop 217 Sidewalk and Bikeway improvements, less important Beyond 15 years and up 15 years Yes; Partially SHORT TER MEDIUM - 1/2 TI 12 Summer Creek property Natural Area Approximately 38 acres under conservation easem M. easement Yes; 0 -5 years million to 5 SHORT TERM: 0 -5 years 1 million Yes; Partially SHORT TERM: LOW -Under SHORT TERM: 0 -5 TI 13 Summer Creek Education Center su er fted 0 -5 years 1/2 miNlan years 1 IN El TI -14 Summer Creek Trail and Corridor Summer Crest Drive and Tigard Street sidewalk and Yes; Partially SHORT TERM LOW - Under SHORT TERM 0-5 bikeway improvements, Fowler Nature Education Trail funded 0 -5 years 1/2 million years MID TO LONG TI -15 Red Rock Creek, Tigard Triangle Limit pollution and restore native vegetation No TERM: 5 -15 LOW -Under MID TERM: 5-15 years in riparian zone 1/2 million years or beyond TI -16 ge ye bridge SHORT TERM LOW - Under years TERM: 0-5 Jack Creek Bridge De Ian and bic I brid Yes : 1 0 -5 years 12 million years TI -17 Jack Park Design Yes SHORT TERM: LOW -Under SHORT TERM' 0-5 1 0 -5 years 1/2 minion years TI -18 East Butte Heritage Park Design /Develop Yes; Partially SHORT TERM LOW -Under SHORT TERM OS 1 funded 0 -5 years 1/2 minion years TI -19 Fanno Creek Park: Fanno Creek House Improvements to indoor space Yes SHORT TERM LOW -Under SHORT TERM OS 1 0 -5 years 12 million years TI -20 Sunrise and Cach Community TERM: SHORT TERM: 0-5 Community Park Design for additional facilities and programming of park Yes 0-5 years rt oMEDIUM -nto 5 12 years 1 nylon TI 21 Krueger Creek and Summer Creek Trail Summer Creek Trail to Mary Woodard School No MID TERM: 5 -15 LOW - Under MID TERM 5-15 years Connection. years 12 minion TI -22 Ascension Trail Ascension Trail Improvements No MID TERM. 5-15 LOW - Under. MID TERM: 5-15 years years 12 million TI -23 Tigard Street trail connection Fanno Creek/north Dakota Street to Tiedeman Street No MID TERM: 5-15 LOW Under years 12 million MID TERM: 5-15 years MID TERM: 5.15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -24 Fanno Creek (crossing realignment) Tiedeman Avenue Crossing Re- alignment No years million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years million 85th Avenue l to City/Ki- A- I(uts, Complete an important gap Trai in Me hai Durham l from Bonita Road to Durham MEDIUM - 1/2 TI -25 Fanno Creek - 85th Avenue to Durham Road. Trail will be built in the street right -of -way of SW No MID TERM: S 15 million to 5 MID TERM: 5.15 years 74th Avenue. Tonquin Trail at Ki- A-Kuts bridge over the years million Tualatin River. w A6olopoLDaua 6uinnoaaeu pus Isis ppafoad seaie leanleu pup slAed :e }uauapel ;y A6olopoylaw 6U!Mommeu pue lsil pafomd seam. iemnleu pue sued :e luawipe1.wd Estimated Jurisdictional P roject # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Coat Recommendation Priorities MEDIUM - 12 TI-26 Pathfinder-Genesis Trail (78) Fenno Creek to Pathfinder Court Trail Yes Partially SHORT TERM million to 5 SHORT TERM. 0.5 funded nded 0.5 years million Y . I'''' MID TO LONG HIGH b million TI -27 Weslalde Trail (TIC) Planned Portland to Tualatin expansion No TERM 5 -15 nd - up MID TERM. 5-15 years years or beyond 0-5 SHORT TERM LOW -Under SHORT TERM'. TI-28 Krueger Creek Tail Walnut Street to Jack Park es. Partially 0 -5 years 1/' million years TI -29 Tualatin Creek wrYea� Connection years Road to Tualatin River Trail No MID TERM 5 -15 MEDI to 5 MID TERM' 5-15 years years million design and planning phase of Feeler pros y MEDIUM - 12 TI -30 Fowler Property Begin 9^ D 9 P property park Yes Partially SHORT TERM million to 5 SHORT TERM: 0-5 1 project Acquisition is complete funded 0.5 years ^ years millio MEDIUM - 12 TI -31 Tree Grove protection Focus on preserving large groves cr name trees No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing 1 million TI 32 River Terrace Annexation Property acquisition for new parks in River terrace UGB No Ongoing Made million Ongoing 1 expansion area and up Address fragmented wildlife corridors by installing a diverse mix of site-appropriate herbs. trees and shrubs to the extent that there are not significant gaps in tree LONG TERM. MEDIUM - 12 LONG TERM Beyond TI -33 Looping north of the Tualatin River cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. No million 5 Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of Beyond is years million is years leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the comdor. Stabilize soil erosion using bioengineering practices. Address fragmented wildlife corridors by installing a _ diverse mix of site- appropriate herbs. trees and shrubs to the extent that there are not significant gaps in tree MEDIUM - 12 F enno Creek forks to the northeast at LONG TERM. LONGTERM. Beyond TI -34 cover. Maximize the wsdth of the vegetated corridor. Nc million to 5 Fenno Creek Park Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of Beyond 15 years million 15 years leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the corridor. Stabilize soil erosion using bioengineering practices. v Address fragmented wildlife corridors by installing a (/1 diverse mix of site - appropriate herbs, trees and shrubs to n the extent that there are not significant gaps in tree MEDIUM -12 . TI 35 Fenno Creek cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. LONGTERM: No million to 5 LON Beyond N Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of Beyond 15 years million 15 years leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the corridor. (/1 _ O qua. _ Address fragmented wedge cornier by instating a Z diverse mix of site- appropnate herbs trees and shrubs to South of SW Riverwood Lane, between the extent that there are not significant gaps in tree LONG TERM MEDIUM - 12 LONG TERM Beyond 0 TI -36 SW Greenland Brire a SW Wood Crest cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. No million to s 70 Avenue Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of Beyond 15 years million 15 years D leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the corridor Stabilize sod erosion using bioengineering practices. • Than Is an iodating take/Fed Midge crossing 1-5 at the fl Hwy 217 interchange. The bridge is part of Lake TI -37 Kruse Way Trail Oswego's Kruse Way Trail. The trail needs to be No LONG TERM HIGH - 5 million LONGTERM Beyond extended to the west only a short distance to connect to Beyond 15 yeah area up 15 years the Fanno Creek Trail. Complete an important gap in the trail from Bonita Road MEDIUM -12 Fanno Creek Trail - Bonrota Road to MID TERM: 5 -15 ken TI 38 Durham Roatl Connection to Durham Road. Trail wit be built in the street right-of- No years millon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years way of SW 74th Avenue. million N R ed Rock Creek BikelPed Creek Provide bike/ d connectivity with bridge MEDIUM -12 TI -39 Pe ry ge crossing of Red No MID TERM 5-15 million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years O Crossing Rock Creek years million MEDIUM -12 w Create neighborhood parkin underserviced area of MID TERM: 5-15 TI 40 Tigard Triangle Park Tigard triangle years million to 5 MID TERM. 5 -15 years 1 years million Purchase TORS on Red Rock Creek for preservation of MID TERM 5-1 MEDIUM - 12 TI -41 Acquire TDRa on Red Rock Creek riparian corridor No years million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years 1 minion . MEDIUM -12 MID TERM S -15 TI -42 Tigard Main Street Green Street Provide new green street facilities on Main Street No million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years 1 years million Connection between Tigard Triangle Provide pedestrian /bicylcle connection between the MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -43 and PCC- Sylvania Tigard Triangle area and PCC - Sylvania NO years million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years minion Provide "green" boulevards for downtown Tigard as MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TI 44 Complete Green Spines in Downtown planned in Fannon Creek Master Plan No years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years mdnon Open Space/Park development in Provide additional open space or neighborhood park in MID TERM. 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -45 Washington Square Washington Square No years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years 1 mini on TI -46 Pedestrian Crossing /Sky Bridge over I- Provide sky bridge pedestrian/bioyle crossing over No MID TERM 5-15 HIGH - 5 m ll on MID TERM 5 -15 years 5 at Ash Creek Interstate 5 at Ash Creek yeah arM up The Washington Square Regional Center Plan - September 1999 established a plan for an 5 -1 TI 47 Washington Square Greenbelt MEDIUM -12 interconnected open space system and a green belt M. around the center that would potentially add NO MID TER million to 5 MID TERM. 5 -15 years po y a property years million value and attract quality developments that ultimately will create a great place to live and work for the region. Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 411, Unknown MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -48 Remove Fish Barrier million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years passage status. Barrier subtype is 'full box' years million Remove unearned culvert ODFW ID #12. Unknown passage status. Burner subtype is 'round.' Owner is ODOT. Culvert assessment by ODFW staff (1996 -19991 using guidelines and criteria to determine fish passage. MEDIUM - 12 MID TERM. 5-15 TI -49 Remove Fish Barrier Comments include. "1 mile from I -S. Double culvert (24" x No million to 5 MID TERM 5.75 years 2) Steps fat 2' over 5' long cascade. Initial steps are 16' years million and 12 ". Subterranean above. Below runs alongside of large pond. Listed as irrigation ditch in straight -line chart." Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 013. Unknown passage status. Barrier subtype is 'round.' Owner is ODOT. Culvert assessment by ODFW staff (1996 -1999) using guidelines and criteria to determine fish passage. MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -50 Remove Fish Barrier Comments include. "1 mile from I -5. Double culvert (24' x No million to 5 MID TERM. 5 -15 yews 2) Steps MN 2' over 5' long cascade, Initial steps are 16" years million and 12". Subterranean above, Below runs alongside of large pond. Listed as irrigation ditch in straight -line chart." Remove Stark Reservoir ODFW ID 014 over unnamed MEDIUM - 12 TI -51 Remove Fish Barrier stream. Barrier subtype 6'permanent darn.' Owner is Na MID TERM 5 -15 million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years Herbert & Roth Stark. y8 °f4 million Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 017 on Ash Creek. MEDIUM - 12 Remove Fish Barrier TI 52 Barrier subtype is 'round.' Unknown passage status. No MID TERM 5-15 Comments include, "historic St. presence above culvert years million to 5 MID TERM. 5 -15 years on Ash Creek" million Remove unearned culvert ODFW ID 018. Passable passage status. Owner is ODOT. Culvert assessment by MID TERM. 5-15 MED • 12 TI 53 R emove Fish Barrier ODFW staff (1996 -1999) using guidelines and criteria to No minion to 5 MID TERM 5 15 years year, minion determine fish passage. Not in straight -line chart Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 020 on Ash Creek. MEDIUM - 12 TI -54 Remove Fish Barrier Partially blocked passage status. Professional judgment No MID TERM 5 -15 million to5 MID TERM 5-15 years used to evaluate culvert. Comments include, "step years million ht•0.4m. old 0r dam." Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 021 on Ash Creek. Barrier subtype is 'round.' Owner is ODOT. Passable MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TI -55 Remove Fish Barrier passage status. Culvert assessment by ODFW staff No million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years (1996-1999/using guidelines and criteria to determine years ninon fish passage. Labeled as "Hedges Cr" on road. TI -56 Remove Fish Barrier Remove unnamed culvert on ODFW ID 022 on Ash No MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 minion to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years Creek. Barrier subtype is 'full box,' years million Remove unnamed darn on ODFW ID 028 on South Fork MEDIUM • 12 Ash Creek, Partially passage status. MID TERM. 5-15 R emove Fish Barrier TI -57 Professional judgment used to evaluate dam. Comments N0 years minion to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years include. "step ht =0.8m, backyard darn." million Remove unnamed culvert on ODFW ID 030 on South MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM • 12 N TI-58 Remove F ish Barrier Fork Ash Creek. Blocked passage status. Professional No million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years judgment used to evaluate culvert on SW Ventura Dr. years million n C Remove unnamed culvert on ODFW ID 032 on South MEDIUM - 12 N TI -59 Remove Fish Barrier Fork Ash Creek. Passable passage status. Professional No MID TERM 5 -15 million l0 5 MID TERM 5 15 years N judgment used to namate culvert. Comments include. years million O "1 path, county boundary." 7 c Remove unnamed culvert on ODFW 10 035 on South Z MEDIUM - 12 TI-60 Remove Fish Barrier Fork Ash Creek. Garner subtype is 'round.' Professional No MID TERM. 5 -15 milion to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 ears Judgment used to evaluate culvert. Comments Include. years 5-15 y ears "1.0 concrete no dro million m p.. P3 Remove unnamed culvert on ODFW 10 036 on South MEDIUM - 12 D TI -61 Remove Fish Barrier Fork Ash Creek. Barrier subtype is Sound.' Professional MID TERM 5 -15 T No million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years judgment used to evaluate culvert. Comments include, yearn million "1.0m concrete no drop." iri CITY OF TUALATIN t. C TU -1 Tonquin Trail also Tigard King Cry Durham and Washington County No LONGTERM: HIGH - 5 million LONG TERM. Beyond Beyond 15 years and up 15 years New bike /Doti bridge over the Tualatin River. Could be a MIO TERM. 5-15 HIGH - 5 million TU-2 w estsitle Trail joint effort with Me Willamette River Water consortium. No years and up MID TERM 5 15 years N MEDIUM - 12 TU -3 Tualatin National Wildlife Refuge Trail Complete linkage to create connection to Tualatin lir LONG TERM LONG TERM. Beyond Connection National Wildlife Refuge Beyond 15 years million to 5 15 years w million ii TU -4 Tualatin River Greenway West and east of 15, extending past 99W to the Westside No LONG TERM HIGH - 5 million LONG TERM Beyond 1 Trail, desire for more acquisition and larger setbacks Beyond 15 years and up 15 years TU -5 Tualatin River Water Trail DevelopmentTualalin River Water Trail within Tualatin No MID TERM 5 -15 HIGH- 5 million MID TERM 5 -15 years years aria up Trail easement needed along private properties east of Myslony St. to Pazciazi Pond. East of Pazcuzzi pond there are approx. 30 acres in Tualatin ownership and rest . TU -6 Hedges Creek Wetland Area in Wetlands Conservancy ownership. Trail route to No LONG TERM HIGH - 5 million LONG TERM: Beyond follow CWS Cipole Trunk Sewer easement. Easements Beyond 15 years and up 15 years needed east of 90th Avenue to where bulk section of toil exists. F anno Creek Trail Improve LONGTERM MEDIUM -12 LONGTERM Beyond TU-7 prove rnanan corridor and complete spur =rune b its o Beyond 15 years mill. to 5 15 years moon Connect Ton Trail. Tualatin River Greenway MEDIUM 1Q TU -8 Tonquin Trail Connection to WES qum y an No LONGTERM: mifon 5 LONGTERM: Beyond Hedges Creek Wetlands to WES Station Beyond 15 years minion 15 years Purchase bail easement from landowners to west of railroad tracks so that future trail users wiN have views of SHORT TERM: MEDIUM 12 SHORT TERM 0.5 TU -9 Koller Wetlands and Ponds Koller Wetlands and ponds. Purchase perched wetland yes '' Men l0 5 (Kolk pond) on top of bedrock. Tonquin Trail likely buil) 0 -5 years; 2012 milker years after this area annexed by Tualatin. Connecting east and west 01 15 than north and south to MEDIUM • 12 TU-1 (] Nyberg Creek Greenway Hwy 89 to 15 bikeway (south) and Tualatin River TERM. er No ^ LONG TERM' Be yon d anion to 5 15 years Beyond 15 years 1 Greenway (north) million Tonquin Trail tradhead river access and bike /pedestrian bridge over Tualatin River en Metro owned land. Ongoing DEO monitored clean-up of or-contaminated LONG TERM MEDIUM - 12 LONG TERM Beyond TU -1 1 Moran Property sod. Tonquin Trail will connect to built section of Tualatin yes mu.an m s River Greenway to east of Moran. Metro and TRNWR Beyond 15 years million 15 years re have IGA for natural resource restoration work tnat the Refuge conducts on Metro land LONG TERM: MEDIUM -1/2 LONGTERM: Beyond TU -12 gaw Off Sim< mute Na Beyond 15 years Al>o s 1 o years 1 I VI i(6o1opoylaw 6uimoLieu pue ;sii i3efoid seam le.inleu pue sued :e }ueunpel }d 0 i(6olopoq ew 6uinnoa.ieu pue 1sil ppa(oad seaae ieanleu pue sued :a luewtpeflV Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Tinning Cost Reeommendatlon Priorities Pe rt TU 13 K olk Property Perched wetland on top of bedrock desirable for LONG TERM: LONG TERM: Beyond r Kohler acquisition and protection No MEDIUM Beyond 15 years million to 5 -12 15 years million Overlap NPS Ice Age Discovery Trail with Tualatin I ce Age Discovery portion of the Tonquin Trail. Incorporate NPS He Age MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -12 TU -14 ge Discover Trail Marketing Plan, Ice Age Visitor Plan, Historical Society No yeas miNion to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years and Chamber support. million MEDIUM -12 TU -15 Nyberg Undercrossing an/bi No LON M: m lion to 5 LONG yond d erg Beyond 15 years million 15 ye TU -16 Parallel Facility to IS Provide a safe parallel pedesthanlbioyole facility parallel No LONG TERM: HIGH -5million LONGTERM: Beyond to Interstate 5 Beyond 15 years and up 15 years Address fragmented wildlife corridors by installing a diverse mix of site-appropriate herbs, trees and shrubs to Wildlife Corridor south of the Tualatin LONG TERM Beyond the extent Meitner° are not significant gaps in tree LONG TERM: MEDIUM - 12 . TU -17 River cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. No million to 5 Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of Beyond 15 years million 15 years leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the corridor. Stabilize soil erosion using bioengineering practices. A Master Plan for the renovation of the barn at Brown's Ferry Park will identity improvements to be made to the SHORT TERM: TU-18 Brown's Ferry Park Barn: Master Plan historic structure so that A is safe for public use, to gain Yes 0-5 years; 2014- Under SHORT TERM: 0-5 12 LOW - million yeah new utility from it as a three season picnic shelter and to 2015 preserve a historic feature of Tualatin's agrarian past. The BFCC Feasibility Study will determine what improvements should be made to modernize the facility, Brown's Ferry Park Com Ctr: Feasibility F b l ie functionality, and prolong its useful life. The SHORT TERM: LOW -Under SHORT TERM. 0-5 TU -19 Study Feasibility Study will study ways to update technological Yes 0-5 years; 2014 12 million years systems, improve access, enhance health and safety 2015 conditions, reduce energy use, enlarge recreation program spaces, and improve inter - facility connectivity. Land is a basic ingredient of a park and recreation v system, and as such the Parks and Recreation Master V3 Plan emphasizes land acquisition as a major goal and, in ri particular land for riverhont parks. Additional nverfront SHORT TERM: C park land wiN strengthen the Greenway as a recreational 0-5 years; 2012 - Tualatin River Greenway: Land TU 2� Acquisition corridor by providing land for facilities (bikeways, docks, Yes 2013, 2073- HIGH - S miNion SHORT TERM: 0.5 2014, 2014 and u N viewing areas) and improving public access to the river 2075, 2015- P Years N and senong as a focus for river related activities. 20782016 -2017 O Financial readiness for acquisition is of critical importance because once the lend has been developed. Z it may never again be available for public ownership. TU 21 Van Roden Com Ctr. Feasibility munity Cen to SHORT TERM: v Yes o -s years. 2014- 2015 Lalky Park is located at 9655 SW Siletz Drive. serving the residential neighborhoods in the south central areas of town. The existing playground structure is a wooden Lafky Park: Playground /Swing set amber framed structure built in 1964. At the age of 27 SHORT TERM: -Under C TU-22 years this structure is at the end of its life cycle, Sr e swing Yes 0-5 years: 2014 SHORT TERM: 45 Replacement LOW - 72 rrlUd er SH SH R set was removed from service (August 2011) as a result 2015 of a failure of the timber supports, the remaining structure is in similar decline. A complete removal and Ui replacement with updated playground system is due. i TU -23 Placeholder for additional project - O Intentionally blank Park targeted for acquisition /Tualatin MID M: 5.15 MEDIU TU -24 River and 99W Neighb No .1rs million ion W million Connection of Tualatin River Greenway MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TU -25 to Moran Property Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No ears million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million Tualatin River Greenway Connection MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TU 26 linking Greenway from west side to 99W Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years • million Riverfront property acquisition for MID TERM . 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TU -27 pedestrian bridge at Boones Ferry Road Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No years million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years million Wetland Park acquisition and MID TERM . 5 -15 M1IEDIUM -12 TU 28 Development Open space acquisition and development No ears million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -112 TU -29 Surf to Turf Trail - Tualatin Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No years million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years ,.I million Add: TU- MID TERM: S-15 North /South k5 Parallel Path No 30 years Nyberg Creek Trail Acquisition and MID TERM: 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TU -31 Undercroasing Bike /pad facilities for connectiv y No years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years million MID TERM: 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TU -32 Myslony Wetlands Open space protection No years milkon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years million Parkway Treatment on Tualatin MID TERM: 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 TU -33 Sherwood Road Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No years million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years million New Park Adjacent to Tualatin MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 TU -34 Elementary School Neighborhood park acquisition and development No years million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years million Trail System to connect to Myslony MID TERM: 5 -15 MEDIUM - -- TU -35 Greenway Bike /pad facilities for connectivity No years minion to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years million Bike /pad facilities improvements between Teton and MID TERM' 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 TU 36 Leveton semen Road Improvements Tualatin Road. No million to 5 MID TERM: 5 -15 years year: minion Estimated Jurisdictional P roject # Project Title !Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities Martlnazz151reet Improvements -Green Watershed improving pe 5-15 MEDIUM - 1 TU -37 Street provemen protection and im dPoike No MID T ERM 5- million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years annectiv rtY Years mullion Project will be in unincorporated Washington County MEDIUM - 12 Construct Tonquin Trail along Cipole since rt is recommended for west side of Cipob. MID TERM. 5-15 5 TU -38 Rd. Construct Tonquin Trait in ROW on west side of Dipole NO years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years Road when that road gets im million proves. CLEAN WATER SERVICES Stormwater treatment and Floodplain Acquire developed flood plain properties and restore to No LONG TERM. HIGH - 5 million LONG TERM Beyond CWS -1 connection of the Tualatin River resore watershed npenan comidor for good storage Beyond 15 years and up 15 years LONG TERM: MEDIUM - 12 LONG TERM: Beyond CWS -2 Fannc Creek Restoration Main Street to Durham Road Na 15 yon million to 5 15 n Bewtind mdbn years Large existing wetland (approximately 30 act norm of MEDIUM -12 A sh Creek Wetland Hwy 217; uend for grazing: opportunity for enhancement LONG TERM: . CWS-3 Na ni non tits LONG TERM' Beyond 15 0.5.5 and funding identified a storage, no current development plans; no Beyond 15 year* identified for acquisition. Property acquisition and restoring the flood plain. CWS-4 Restore riparian health Change geomorphology conditions of streams as a long No LONGTERM: HIGH -5 million LONG TERM'. Be Beyond 15 yeah and up 15 yawn Beyond term strategy to address hydrology and hydraulics CWS -r Restore riparian health All open streams provide for riparian canopy to improve No LONG TERM HIGH -5 million LONG TERM Beyond health and function No 15 years and up 15 years CWS-6 Preserve existing forest For ecosystem services including stormwater No LONGTERM, MEDIUM ^ 112 LONG TERM: Beyond management Beyond 15 years million to 5 15 years r treatment using open space 1 1111 1 1HORT TERM CWS t+ W Hwy 99W in y o Tiga City, Project 0.5 ars', 2011• II.',- 12 SHORT TERM -7 Hwy 99W Median Retrofit partnered with ODOT and city of Tigard, Pre -design Yea 2412 2012 m o 5 years funded for FY2011.12. Design planned for FY2012 -13 - 2013 minion future funding dependent on report Sub -baste watershed master plan to identify conveyance improvement, culvert replacement. facility/out retrofits. SHORT TERM: CWS - 8 Fenno Creek Stormwater Basin Master and water quality treatment challenges and opportunities Yes 0-5 years, 2011- LOW - Under SHORT TERM 0-5 Q Pl an for enhancement projects. Project funded for FY2013 -14 2012. 2012- 1/2 mnion years N no funding identified for potential solutions 2013 n Located throughout the SW Corridor, retrofit Yes. Limited MID TERM 5 -15 HIGH - 5 million C CWS -9 Stormwater Oumall and Facility Retrofits opportunities exist to address stormwater treatment and District MID TERM 5-15 years VI will be identified when alignment is Selected. Funding years and up VI Should be coordinated with the City of Tualatin. When O Tonquin Trail is constructed over CWS' Dipole Sanitary Trunk Sewer easement between Pazcuzzi Pond east to W$c� HEnehaas ncemeil Creek nt and Wetland pp improvement, invasive No built sections of trail near Tualatin Police Station. MEDIUM - 12 v C-1� g oortunities will exist for habitat lm - LONGTERM'. LONG TERM. Beyond mdion to y species removal and native planbngs. Also opportunity Beyond 15 years million 15 years to improve wildlife passage at culvert where trail will cross Teton Ave. Most of the wetlands are owned by Wetand Conservancy and City of Tualatin. TI 71 �+ Near City Hall - srre embank stabilization and MEDIUM - 1/2 C WS -11 Fanno Creek Improvement - Downtown enhancement project. Most of the wetlands is owned by No LONGTERM mi llion to 5 LONG TERM Beyond Wedand Conservancy no funding identified Beyond 15 years milt. 15 years 7 New Bonita Rd between Main and Hal Rd - Phase 2 TERM: T CWS -12 Fenno Creak Enhancement Wlancemeerton75 awe complex, Unhanded,2015+ No LONG T years ui Wnelwe expectation Located throughout the sw Corridor. Yes Limited N 2 O g a exist District MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 1 CWS -13 Culvert Replacement to address fish passage and capacity and nd cur vnl rues be Funding million to 5 MID TERM • 5-15 years identified when the alignment is selected Available roars million w Local and regional trails being constructed eTonquin IM Treat potential impact on existing natural resources: opportunity for enhancing degraded corridor, including yes; Limited improving wildlife passage when new trail crossing built MEDIUM - 1/2 CWS -14 Cedar Creek Corridor beneath highway 99. Wildlife passage improvements Distract MID TERM 5-15 million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years also recommended where Cedar Creek crosses beneath Funding years million Road and Roy Rodgers Available Eddy y gars Road when trail is beta over road in these locations- Metro funded trail master plea; enhancement le nethetdeeL Doak Creek and Edgewater Located in King City. presently being developed SHORT TERM MEDIUM - 12 C WS -15 opportunity for constructing a regional stormwater No 0 -5 years 2012- million to 5 SHORT TERM 0 - J Su treatment facility exists 2013 million Years nTl1/l+ .IC IaaY�MAheee•i- PROJECT 2 - �- - SMOR-TTERM -Gi CPa'tV"�'f9 COMPLETE r - - Via' Vie "t ^ . _ 701.2 webers years This Project in partnership with the City of Tigard, removes five exposed sewer crossings, adds 1.200 feet SHORT TERM MEDIUM • fO D err Dell at Walnut of sanitary sewer, and removes several manholes in the 0-5 Woodard c C WS Y park. Benefits l nciude fish es 0 -5 years 2012- million to 5 SHORT TERM city pa passage and 2013 melon yeah streambank stabik2abon on 400-feet of Derry Del Creek Proposed schedule. Construction in summer of 2014. Sanitary trunk upgrade that Is located in the Fanno Creek SHORT TERM. MEDIUM - 12 SHORT TERM 0 -5 CW$ -18 Famnu Interceptor Upgrade Yes 0 -5 years 2012- million to s Corridor, phased construction in FY20142015. 2013 million years CWS - 19 Upper Tualatin Interco torU Sanitary trunk upgrade pending sanrta SHORT TERM MIUM-12 p pgrade W 9 ry sewer model yes 0 -5 years. 2012- million to 5 SHORT TERM 0.5 venacatiom, located near Hwy 99W corridor 2013 mdion Years Sanitary trunk upgrade to support More indusMal growth in Sherwood and Tualatin UGB: located south of Hwy SHORT TERM: MEDIUM -12 CWS -20 Onion Flat Trunk Sewer Upgrade 99W corridor. Opportunity to coordinate with acquisition Yes 0 -5 years', 2012- million to 5 SHORT TERM' 0 -5 and protection targeted by Crty of Sherwood in Project 2013 million Yea' SH -12. Potential project near Tigard Should be targeted for acquisition. There is an on going active development SHORT TERM MEDIUM - 1 t on site. Ac 2 F ields Property perms Acquisition would need to occur quickly. SHORT TERM 0 -5 C W $ -21 Pertr No 0 -5 years, 2012- million to s CWS has no plans to acquire. Near Bonita Rd - Habitat 2013 million Years restoration opportunity vnth an eaistmg mce of stand of vegetation/trees. NJ A6olopoylaw 6uimoiaeu pue 1sib pod seam lean;eu pue S ped :e luauatpel1d 000 i(6olopoy}aui 6uinnoaaeu pue }sib p eload see.te pue stied :e iueuay)elly Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Coat Recommendation Priorities WASHINGTON COUNTY Address ingmented vdMBN corridor by installing a dNerne rrlbr of aite-apprepelate herbs,, trees and shrubato WA-I - WNtlBA wrridor iwean Ash Creak - the eMeM Oiat. gsm Nuns are not.aignihcaM gaps�ai trot • • LON4 TERM', MEDIUM - 112, LAG TERM: Beyond t/Y .) WU Red TaYaoB be Course cover. Maurigethe width, ofthe vegetated da% Nt million to 5 end BayorM.15 years 75 years Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of miBOn . leaving a gap e1 Vas cover, connection Siang She condor. . • . Etebdoti nog erosion using bioengineadng pmc9oeo. - • ' C. `:: e n _ D.D lAt. .ion Fret,_ . MID TERM -a-w tempted 4 rears Interim Tonquin Trail to serve connectivity needs MAI MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 WA -3 Interim Tonquin Trail overall trail is acquired and developed. No years milion to 5 MID TERM: 51S years mggon Remove unnamed eulvart ODFW 10116 on Ceder CraeIi ' Cotner is Weshlngton County. Pessahla Passage states MEDIUM -�1/2 ERM 6- WA-4 Remove Fish Bier M� Culvert eseesameby DOFw stag(19g6- 1999)using -' No' • MIDT miAon tc TERM. 515 years - guidelines and criteria lb daVmrine tied passage year nuBOn.' CommeMS include, "05 rndes east of Elwe•t Rd" Remove Tualatin Refuge Dam ODFW ID P. Owner is MID TERM' 5 -15 MEDIUM -12 WA-5 Remove Fish Barrier Na million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years USFWS. Barrier subtype is a permanent dam years million Remove unnamed cutoertOOFW ID'#16 on39 inter MEDIUM •'12' ` WA Remove Fish Barrier Creek Culvert assessment byO Passable passage , status:O FW wpar isODOT. MID 7ER,M:.S -15 Dstalt(ISSBolbgS)using • mars • toy MIDTERM' 5 yarn • guidelines and crilerid to determine 8sh passega; .r million . . . WA Remove Fish 8arrbr • Remove onnamed banner COFW ID #19 Passage stales , MID TERM: 5.75 to MEDh1M -12 o YYn 7 unknown, BanM t yp e nM .n tl icatl oOrnp: NO yeah mlgbn S MID TERM: S15year; • Wq $ Remove Fish Herter • Remove unnamed °utoeri bDFW ID 1z3 on Aah Creek ' No. • MID TERM: 5-15 MED -12 Ba q rber suplype u8 box.• .. '. - ' .. .. .. eah • million toe MID -TERM: 0-15 years y miBOn Remove unnenied cutoe#OOFW ID e2s an Ash 'Creak . .MEDIUM -112 - LAtA $ Passable Dassage Merits. Banner subtype YMl bar.• M� TERM: 5.45 • l[e"%" RamoMt Fbk 8larrler ' No million to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years ` Professionaljudgtnud USedtaevalUatetxrkrerton SW, .yearye Locust his 1.5m box culvert.. . million- n Remove unnamed culvert ()DEW ID 137 on Ash Creek C MEDIUM 12 Barter e'round:• Pas"bi stage aMUe MID TERM S-15 1,0 WA-10 R.nlov. Fbh Barter • Profe" a oasd mevaluate culvert on SW No- years • nitwit t° 5 MID TERM: 5.75 years N 00th. 0 is 1.9m controls, widen° drop:. .. miNen O Remove onnamed °Mont ODFW 10138 on SaM1 Fork - - z W Remove FIsh Bona Ash esable passage te. De starsnier u. 5 MEDIUM -' 'roUrCrMek Pas ' ProlesaionN judgrlMM used to evaklrt e g1Ne'r Is No ME) T T:: : Melon to 5, MID TERM: 5.75 years SW 8001.111, 1.5m meth, with no drop. mihon . . .. Remove unnamed cuFoert,COFW 10 *39 on SOMIt Fork Remove Flab Barter Ash Creak Passable passage status. Barrier subtype is MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -. yea 'Ti WPr1 No migionto 5 MiD TERM: 5-15 years „ 'round.' Protassional)udgrt4ntused to avaluab cvNert.k yeah is at e prIVate driveway and is 0.91. concha. miMOn. Ramwe unnamed culvert ODFW 1DM0oil Soon Fork ' , wA-13 Remove Flab Barrier Ash Creek Passable passage status Bartiar subtype is . - MID TERM' 5-15 ME - 72 ' 'round. , cu feaafonal jutlgmentusetl to evNOMe lvert at No. INN milion toy MIDTERM: 5 year .. SW 82nd. Bin 1.5rn metal ml' no drop.' 00 ,. 1./1 Remove unnamed culvert,OOFW ID1410.9°001 Pork, . . N A A Ash Creek Passable Passage status Banter w MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM - ere 1 R a n aw Fbh B a rt er SourM' Proferaionaijudgmanl WOO PI avapwta culvert et No Wen s mas to 5 MIDTERM 5 15 ye SW 82nd. II I.tOr meth wOh n9 drop. ml on .. . Remove unnamed vetoed OOPW 10842 on Ash Creek .: MEDIUM -12 A Passabta Dusage ors taw a. sysis tilypek.'round.' MID TERM 5.75 w�� 5 Remove RNha Barrier Pr°rtssional brtlgmsnt to evalal0eta cows. h Nil No ye.r nitro. toy 'MID TERM: 5•15 years - toWk ate prhate driveway - milkon Remove unturned velvet OOFW ID 143 On Ash Creak • MEDIUM " 12. WA -16 Remove fish Boner Passable Passage spWS. ee rie subtype k round No MID TERM'S 15 to 5 MID TERM: 5 year prohaaionN judgnleM used evaluate culvert. k e 1.7m year • meth, al a privab driveway.' mip Remove emamed vetoed OOFW iD844 on Ash Cr 5 e ek . MEDIUM -112 Passable pesa steeds: Benhlnuol ie'remd' - M: A -� 7 Remove Foil Banter MID TER ysa million trxN to 5. MID TERM: 5.15 years • Proeaaionaljudgment used to.tvatuata wNeR k h 1.7m ro on metal, at a pnvMe dtlwwey. . . years Remove unnamed "del, ODFW 101145 on Ash Creek. TERM. 5-45 MEDIUM -12 . WA-18 M� ' Remove Fish Barrier Comments include, "conaeta structure . slide . to de' tlalxl � No million 5 MID TERM: 5-15 years pond" mi0i00 Remove unnamed cotoertoDFW W 147 on AshCraek. MEDIUM • 1/2 Passable passage status. Barrier subtype Is 'round. NO ID M TERM. 0.15 WA -� ,Q Rmgv► Denier ProfeasionaljudgmeM Used to evaluate cunt. at SW year mdhon to 5 : MID TERM: 5.15 years .. • Oedarttest S k 1.5m motel milli °° Remove unnamed culvert ODFW 10152 on Ash Creek MEDIUM -12. Relnow flea Denier Panay blacked passage status. BordeLetts' a . MID TERM 5.15 ' WA-20 Pound' l rofssalonal judgment used ta ealvart a No ' . • year °`41°° e S MID TERM 515 year SW 80th. B is g.gm'cOncreb.. mBiMr . Remove unnamed culvert ODFW 101630. Ash'Creek MEDIUM -:trl Panay blocked passage status. Banner subtype is MID TERM: 5 WA-21 R emove Fish D arner 'round.' Professional judgmentused to evaluate cuNertat • No y°ar mBw ta 5 MID TERM: Si5 year • SW 60th•. h k 5.9m concrete. miMOn Remove unnamed oulwrt ODFW ID e55vn ASh Creek. WA-22 Pn essio Pasag status. Bante subtype b'uMmown.' MID TERM 5.15 MEDBIM -12 . YYA-22 Remove Fbh. BarAar Profasalonall e used to.ev alusle 0raverl, g k M a N° years' tnBian to 5 MID TERM: 5-15 year , , priest. driveway.. .. mBlon ... . Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID #56 on Ash Creek - MEDajM -12 _ W A 2 3 Passable passage status. Banter subtypek'roeld.' M10 TER �, Rem°w Rib N0 5.15 million toS MW TERM 5-15 veers Professional judgment used e evaluate culvert at 3W ' ' year r 74th. h Is 1.Om concrete... ._ moor, • .. Remove.onnarned culvert 0,05W ID 457 op Ash Creek - MEDIUM -12 Banter Pessebepassage etetue'Bamer subtype is'round.' MIDTERM 5-16,. • WA-24 Remo Flah ProfessionelNdgment used to !splines culvert SW yeah mason yea million to S MID TERM: 5 15 yeah million'. 74th. h is 1 concreta. _ .. Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title (Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID 081 on Ash Creek. WA-25 Passable passage status. Banter subtype is 'unknown.' MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM • 72 Remove Fish Barrier Professional judgment No million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 yeas I gm•nt used to evaluate culvert al a o ld years driveway - not used anymore. million CITY OF SHERWOOD . IU-. MED SH -1 Cedar Creek Trail provide pedestrian/bike connection No LONGTERM Beyond o" N° Beyond 15 years million M l0 55/2 15 years million SHORT TERM: MEDIUM - 12 SH -2 Tonquin Trail Oregon Street/Fonquin Road intersection to Roy SH TERM 0.5 Rodgers Road. Yee 0.5 years. 2017- million to 5 years 2011 million MID TERM 5 -15 t1EUM - 12 SH -3 99W culvert underpass Provide pedestrian/eke connection No years m to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million MID TERM: 5-15 MEDIUM -12 SH -4 Adams Park north Acquire and develop neighborhood park No million to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 years years n S H-5 Complete the Trail System Complete the Trail System and Connect the Community No Ongoing HIGH and -5 miup Nlon Ongoing SH -7 Design and Construct a Skatepark Acquire and develop skate park No LONG TERM. LOW -Under LONG TERM Beyond Beyond 15 years 12 million 15 years SH -8 Bike Ped Bridge crossing of Railroad Provide sate pedesinar/bike crossing of train hacks No LONG TERM HIGH- 5 million LONG TERM Beyond tracks Beyond 15 years and up 15 years T own Center Plan MEDIUM - S H -9 Open Space Acquits end develop open space No MID TERM: 5.15 million to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 years years million MID TER. 5-15 MEDIUM -12 M SH -1 0 Tannery Site Acquire and develop No years million to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 years Pin S H- .t Set aside remnant land from hansportabon protect for NO MID TERM 5 -15 LOW - Under MID TERM 5 -15 years I .s I Roundabout Development construction of a roundabout and a park or open space. years 1 million MEDIUM - 12 SI k, I. 12 Chicken Creek Watershed AcquifN pp On oorNnNes for watershed protector TERM 5 -15 million No years �Ilion to 5 MID TERM S15 years v million N Improve Amphitheater in Stella Olsen Park. wetland n • improvements - Address fragmented wildlife corridors by C installing a diverse mix of site- appropriate herbs, trees and shrubs to the extent that there are not significant MID TERM. 5-15 LOW •Under L/1 S H -13 Stella Olsen Park gaps in tree cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated No MID TERM 5-15 years I corridor. Create occasional meadows but not at the years 12 million O expense of leaving a gap in tree cover connection along the corridor. Stable soil erosion using bioengineering Z praceas. 1 1 0 MEDIUM - 12 B PA and PGE Line Easements T1 Trail opportunities within easements of BPA and POE for No /02 TERM 5-15 /v S H -1 4 connectivity years mdkon to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years million Address fragmented wildlife corridors by instating a T diverse mix of site - appropriate herbs. trees and shrubs to 71 the extent that there are not significant gaps in tree cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. C Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of leaving a gap m tree cover connection along the comdor. MEDIUM -112 (p S H -15 Floodplain Imprevamaids north of Stabile soil erosion using bioengineering practices. LONG TERM LONG TERM 5 -. Sunset Boulevard NO veers Beyond 15 years million to 5 15 1 Excavate to connect isolated doodplans and to create 1 . million LA additional 5oodplain areas terraces adjacent to streams. N Plant the terraces wsth a diverse mix of sae appropriate 0 herbs, trees and shrubs. Grade the terraces to prevent C fish entrapment when flood water levels decrease. lAU Address fragmented wildlife corridors by installing a dverse mix of site - appropriate herbs. trees and shrubs to the extent that there are not significant gaps in Tree cover. Maximize the width of the vegetated corridor. Create occasional meadows but not at the expense of leaving • gap In bee cover connection along the corridor. MEDIUM - 12 S H -16 Chicken Creek (Etwort and Edy Stabilize soil erosion using bioengineering practices. o LONG TERM million to 5 LONG TERM Beyond 1 Intersection) Beyond 15 years motion 15 years Excavate to connect isolated floodplalns and to create additional flnodplain areas terraces adjacent to streams. Plant the terraces with a diverse mix of site appropriate herbs, trees and shrubs. Grade the terraces to prevent fish entrapment when flood water levels decrease. Remove unnamed culvert °DPW 10 01 on Cedar Creek. Passable passage status. Owner is Washington County. MEDIUM -12 S H -17 Remove Fish Barrier Culvert assessment by ODFW staff 11996-19991 using MID TERM 5-15 melon to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years guidelines and criteria to determine fish passage. Culvert years million is 0.1 miles west of Parrot ML Rd. TUALATIN HILLS PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT This protect well be the development of a brand new Community Park in THPRD's southwest quadrant SHORT TERM HIGH - S mAwn rtY Park ma Project amenities have yet to be determined but y yeas 2012- 5 0 -5 and up: 7 SHORT TERM. 0-5 • TH -1 S W Commun include athletic fields picnic areas play equipment y eah pathways or unity gardens. More details me 2816 mion become available as project star -up approaches. Master planning for Vista Brook Park began in tall 2010. Renovations vnN include pathways. play equipment. SHORT TERM LOW - Under SHORT TERM 0-5 TH -2 Vista Brook Park picnic areas basketball court upgrades parking 0 -5 years 2013 12 m o" years improvements landscape plantings and natural area ST000a restoration • _ The Nature! Resources Department l conchal exGnsle owed tre shr. M intenive befh rub SHOR TER L OW - nder SHORT TERM: 0-5 TH -3 Fenno Creek P garakg to pre shade and and habitat s dive / rsity at the 20- Yes 0-S years: 2013 u U mi wh : acre Fenno Creek Perk A study site for creek and water 2014 1 ears flow improvements wd also be incorporated i(6olopoq ew 6UIMOJJeU pue ;sil ppafoad seaie peanleu pue s)aed :g luawg3elly o 46olopoytaw 6uinnaiJeu pue;sii 13efoad seam leaneu pue sued :a luaw1PeUUd Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title ILocatlon Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommandation Priorities The Natural Resources Department eel be completing a large -scale removal of non-native weeds then replanting with native plants and/or shrubs. During this process. the Natural Resources Department will be re-routing and/or closing legal trails. The 27.75-acre park is predominantly forested with a sloping terrain. A section of South Johnson Creek flows through the park from south SHORT TERM MEDIUM - 12 TH -4 Loaeami Hart Woods to north. Tributary streams and wetlands also exist on- Yes 0 -5 years. 2010- million to 5 S HORT TERM 0.5 site. The 2001 master plan cats for bails through the 2015 million years natural area, with a main trail segment planned to be part of the future South Johnson Creek Community Trail. Otter master plan amenities include a smal parking lot with adjacent picnic areas and informational kiosk. an informal central gathering area for environmental education of smal groups, and new pedestrian bridges. The Natural Resources Department will be enhancing the natural area by reproving non -eaboe plants. They will SHORT TERM. LOW - Under TH -5 Slate Brook Park then replant with native trees and shrubs after the park Yes 0-5 years. 2011- 12 tuition SHORT TERM 0-5 development occurs. In order to further preserve 2012 20.500,00 years habitats, this project will likely enhance pond edges and potentially add basking logs for wildlife. The P^•kOiatrict hacapproved -c mastesplen -tor- Jordan- SMGRT ERAS MEDIUM —iR- TH 6 Jordan -Weeee Naural- he _ rue 9 2Bgg milkae la 6 SHORT - TERM -as reek eelEbe- funded-000bond monayand -tsa- linear- 2013 .- a bo:rdwolE'cr0 5- inslagad-te-pravide tar complete sae - (Barrows Rd to Scholls Ferry Road) of the Westside Trail is a 0.39 - mile -long trail that will begin at the Tigard city Q limits at Barrows Road, connecting the east/west MEDIUM - 12 Westside Trail - Se SHORT TERM. gmen t no. 1 Summercreek Communi ry Trail then continuin g north Yes 0 -5 years 2009 million to 5 SHORT TERM: 0 -5 N TH -6 (Barrows Rd to Scholls Ferry Road) toward Scholls Ferry Road. Along with the Initial benefit minion years of connecting multiple regional and community trails. this 2013 4,150,000 n Vail wig also allow easy access for local patrons to the C s - VII (Galena Way to Rigert Road) of the Westside Trail will SHORT TERM N TH -7 Westside trail - Segment no. 4(Galena connect Galena Way to Retort Road. After completion HIGH - 5 million SHORT TERM 0 -5 O Way to Rigert Road) this segment well connect 3.32 miles of the Westside ves 0.5 years. 2009- and up years Trail. 2013 2 (ML Williams-Burntwood Way to Dams Road) of the v Westside Trail - Sit tno.7 Mt. Westside Trail will connect Burntwood Way to Dams gmen ( SHORT TERM Road over the Mount Williams parcel. This is a million SHORT TERM 0-5 TH -8 Williams-Burntwood Way to Davis you o.s yeas 2009 HIGH - 5 million f7 Road) partnership project wN1 the city of Beaverton and is a 2017 and up years very challenging segment due to steep topography and TI erishng natural resources (trees). Westside Trail - CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO C SHORT TERM- HIGH - 5 million SHORT TERM 0.5 LO -1 Kruse Way Path Acquire and develop trail connection Yes 0 -5 years 2012- and up years (p 2013 Develop Surf to Turf Trail that is planned to connect MID TERM 5 -15 HIGH • 5 million Vi LO -z Surf to Turf Trail Fenno Creek Trail and the Tonquin Trail by following the No years and up MID TERM. 5 -15 years Pacific and Western Railroad alignment N SHORT TERM 0 LO -3 Create children's nature play areas Develop areas for children's play /nature play No 0-5 years, 2012/ LOW -Under SHORT TERM 0 -5 2017 12 minion years LU SHORT TERM LO-4 Opportunities to be close to nature Create opportunities to be d LOW - Under SHORT TERM 0.5 close to nature No 0 -5 years. 2012- 1 Under years 2017 MEDIUM - 12 L0-5 Opportunities for connectivity Promote opportunities for connectivity No Ongoing million to 5 Ongoing million LO-6 Acquire park/natural resource lands Acquire park/natural resource lands 1 over 30 acres) rlo HIGH 5 million Qngmng „d °p ° ongoing LO-7 Remove Fish Barrier Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID k7 on Bat Creek. MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM - i2 million to 5 MID TERM . 5 -15 years Unknown passage status. Barrier subtype is 'full No box.' years million LO-8 Remove Fish Barrier Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID #8 on Ban Creek. MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - million to 1 1 MID TERM 5 -15 Unknown passage status. Ban No ter subtype is years years million Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID #9 on Bat Creek. MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM - 12 LO-9 Remove Fish Barrier Unknown passage status. Banter subtype is 'round.' NO years million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years minion Rem Unknown No Remove unnamed culvert ODFW ID N10. Vnk MID TERM. 5 -15 MEDIUM • 12 LO-1 0 Remove Fish Barrier million to 5 MID TERM 5 -15 years passage status. Barrier subtype is 'round.' years million OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Implement OCS strategies to protect the Western Painted and Western Pond turtle that remain in planning area Focus on breeding populations by creating Turtle O D FW -1 Protect native turtle populations Conservation Areas to provide strongholds for source Ongoing HIGH ion 5 mllon On populations to sustain populations into the future as .,:::pill nd up going development continues. Take actions that support TCA's (connecbvny. acquisition. adjacent upland acgwsition sale road crossings. protections. etc.). Delineate areas where trails may not be appropnate in ODFW -2 Guidelines for trails outside of habitat order to protect wddlfe populations into the future while No On g01 °g On LOW •Under ongoing set providing trailsdransportabon connectivity and green 1/2 million space experiences. Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities Identify uplands prior to development in expanding UJ0 that would be appropnate for a trail in order to avoid OD FW -3 Identify valuable uplands unnecessary imps to sensnrvs resources / wldlde Ongoing LOW -Under Ongoing Preserving greenspace in uplands that hails can run 12 million through will get away horn relying too heavily on npanan areas for trail connectivity and nature trails. Create cap for linear feet of hail )any bail- city parks or ODFW -4 Create cap for linear feet of trail Metro) per acre per square mile or percent of total No Ongoing LOW- Under 2 mien Ongoing Creek length. ODFW -5 Support Heritage Tree Program Crease greater pamcipabo :ncentrve for heritage tree No MEDIUM • 12 program at Metro level and/or City level. going mien to 5 Ongoing million Crest. guidelines that help identify where federally ODFW -6 Guidelines for commuter trails funded commuter trails t 16-20 foot wide •sphalt bails) No Ongoing Low •Under are and are not appropriate for ecosystem heakh and gO1 ° in million Ongoing function. Encroachment of buffers across city entities is a large 0 DFW -7 Incenlivize maintaining riparian buffer and unenforced issue. Incentiviz• maintaining npanan No Ongoing LOW - Under ongoing buffer on private property. 12 million P rotect properties along the Tualatin ontize acqulsitionfprotection praperhes sti the ODFW -8 g Tu Pn alabntoWillamettevi .Reck Creek/COffa.Lair .Creek No ongoing HIGH - Smlllon R Wildlife Condor. and up 9aing Identify and create Oak Conservation Areas tOCS OD FW -9 Create Oak Conservation Areas strategy habitat). Prioritize parcels 10 acresr for No ongoing • 5 million Ongoing protection acquisibion. Incentnnze oak (singe tree or and up group) preservation on private property. TUALATIN RIVER NATIONAL WILDUFE REFUGE TRNWR - Accalarabon /deceleration lanes on HWY 99 at Refuge MID TERM 5 -15 MEDIUM _ 12 Additional turn out lanes on 99W entry are needed, very dangerous coming to visitor's No million to 5 MID TERM 5-15 years 1 center. especially from the south years million TRNWR - Restoration of Rock Creek Restore Rock Creek to its meandering channel and MID TERM 5-15 MEDIUM - 12 2 improve hydrology. NO years million l0 5 MID TERM 5-15 years million v TRNWR - - .. Tinsa 5 is • ° g o u e t W `t Pwlt- awel-PNN• No sus s Vi wan. sera. the Re h rs tnge ar Metro acqu w our M an ws years a12 B us Service to Refuge is needed to maintain and N ri TRNWR - expand service. There are current bus stop issues at this MID TERM 5 MEDIUM -12 Improve Bus Access to TNWR location A safe cross�n dedicated sto lane is No mien to 5 MID TERM. 5-15 yea 4 9 or ppmg Years matron _ needed with a bus shaker. TRNWR - C+s h.xmg and r. n Z 5 Develop Tonquin Trail to TNWR g ac±ss to r ;'! ✓R ale^ MID TERM 5 -15 LG l: - ter .. s Z • from T ears .,alatm 1.'2 million fdl� TERM TRNWR - Improve wildlife passage fromproperbes across 99W MID TERM. 5-15 MEDIUM - yea 6 Improve wildlife passage across 99W including Onion Flats to TNWR. N0 years million t 5'12 MI TERM 5-15 mmillion o TUALATIN RIVERKEEPERS T Implement Washington Square Ensure Irvabney and environmental goals or Washington -.131-.131- a P - 5 lion TRV - 1 Regional Center Plan Square Regional Center Plan N0 and up Policy Ir TRV - 2 Separation of bikes and c ar{ Separation of Dikes and cars is needed and consider No HIGH -5 Killion Policy 7 shalow drainages that separate vehicle types and up (D TRV - 3 Natural Resource acquisition M Have the City of Tigard consider buying natural tic HIGH • 5 mimillion Corridor resources and men selling me developable portions and up p0kcy Ui SW Beth Additional bike path and SW Roth extending from Oelson Road on to the north MEDIUM _ 12 O TRV 4 s dewalks needs to be connected to HWY 99 by bike peal as well No mien N 5 Policy 0 as sidewalk system million w Full drainage length of South Fork Ash Creek extending MEDIUM - 12 TRV - 5 Restoration of South Fork Ash Creek underneath I-5 and Barbur Boulevard down to Mt. No n N 5 Pokey 'Sylvania needs to be considered and protected million Full drainage length of Red Rock Creek which enters MEDIUM -12 TRV - 6 Restoration of Red Rock Creek Fenno Creek opposite the Tigard Library needs to be No million to 5 Policy considered and protected mion Wide center median on 99W needs to be used for MEDIUM -12 TRV - 7 99 W Center swale con verities', .. stormwater quality and quantity. 99W center swale No million to 5 Policy conversion for stormwater quality and quantity. million T RV 8 Jaal- Sa,a+ew»awr.aed No Pekes Red G«k.and-t re ToalakePw.r— TRV - 9 Improve Fenno Creek bridge coos m de Bridge crossings need to be expanded to allow far creek HIGH - 5 million ion meander. provide safe .11s passages and adequate No Poky room for pedestnan and bike trans. and up Removal of small dams in the SW Corridor would improve water quality and fish ha bitat pive HIGH - 5 million TRV - 10 Removal of watershed Malaya goals of me Tu alatin Basin Haelh and Streams be su plea port Ho and pp Policy Examples of these dams are at Summerlake Park and Murray Hil Shopping Center on Murray Bald. There are a lot of huge parking lots in the SW Corridor including Washington Square. the Tigard Triangle and TRV - 11 Improve stormwater Quality big box retailers in Sherwood. We should use this HIGH - S million policy planning opportunity to eliminate runoff hem these and up parking lots and the large roofs they serve) with pervious pavement, parking lot trees. bioswales. acorools. Bus access to the Tualatin River National Wildkl• Refuge • is good outbound but not inbound. A sky bridge or tunnel across 99W would provide Tn-Met riders a safe way to get back to Portland from the refuge. The crossing of TRV - 12 99W stnan Crossing /Sky Bridge o 99W at Durham Road is unsafe. Several pedssthana HIGH - 5 mion Percy have been killed here. We need a padestnen bridge or • and up tunnel. Tonquin Trail crossings of 99W and Tualatin - Sherwood Road should be made with safety in mind • (skybndgesl UJ —1. ((60 0 o }ew 6u!MOaaeU lie Isi ppafoid seam eanieu pue s .Ie I P 4 P I I P �I d :8 luawllpeTl }v UJ N A6olopogi.ew 6uiMo.ueu pup 1S!I 13efo.rd Seam pue stied :8 luawtpellv Estimated Jurisdictional Project # Project Title /Location Project Description Funding Funding Timing Cost Recommendation Priorities TUALATIN RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL Remove barners such as darns and culverts and/or mitigate their impacts to endemic species. Prioritize Remove steam barriers to endemic T HIGH -5 million ualatin River. Scoggins Creek Basin, Dairy -McKay TUWC - 1 Basins. Gales Creek Basin. upper Rock Creek Basin No pokey species Chiscben and Cedar Creek sub - basins, Jaquith and and up • McFee sub-basins. Beginning with those areas positioned downstream. Remove bamers such as dams and culverts and/or mitigate their impacts to cut throat trout species. Prioritize TUWC- 2 Remove stream barriers to Cutthroat Bronson, Willow, Cedar Mi. Wapato, Ayers, Hill No HIGH -S milion Trout Christensen, Burns. Fenno, and Davis sub - basins. and up Policy beginning with those areas positioned downstream in relation to the 14 sub - watershed. Geographic priorities. Tualatin River main stem and at TUWC- 3 Improve hydrologic conditions 1.954 sub-basins. Improve hydrologic conditions. Ensure No HIGH ilion and up Policy adequate water flow to meet endemic fish needs Geographic priorities. Tualatin River main stern and aN TUWC- 4 Improve hydrologic conditions sub-basins. Improve hydrologic conditions' HIGH - 5 million . Manage peek No and up Polley flows and storm water in urbanized areas. Improve geomorphic conditions: increase bank stability, increase sinuosity (remove channel straightening). HIGH - 5 million TUWC- 5 Improve riparian conditions decrease channel entrenchmenhncrease flood plain N0 and up Policy connectivity. Prioritize in low to mid gradient a . Manage invasive species to gain increase in native plant community diversity, expand stream cover, and increase million HIGH • S m TUWC- 6 Restore riparian conditions woody debris. prioritize project sites that affect longer No and m on Policy stretches and on both sides of the stream. and achieve larger riparian zones in proportion to stream size, _ Implement strategies to improve water quality in the Tualatin River. The DEO l the Tualatin River as water v TUWC- 7 Improve Water Quality quality limited' due t as higher temperature(low flows No HIGH -S million Policy and lack of riparian shade). dissolved oxygen (oxygen and up (� consuming substances that end up in the sediment). and presence of bacteria. C Preserve. restore. and enhance wetlands and L HIGH - 5 miNion TUWC- 8 Restore wetlands and floodplains floadplains. including emergent wetlands in all areas of No and up Policy Tualatin River watershed. Preserve intact upland areas Such as oak woodlands. 0 TUWC- 9 Preserve intact upland area, HIGH - 5 million praine and oak savannas in aN areas of Tualatin River No and u Policy 7 watershed, p L TUWC- 10 Remove invasive species priority removal of invasive species in all areas of No HIGH - 5 million Policy Tualatin River watershed. and up P rioritize connectiM or u 1 its Prioritize connectivity of uplands to support vnglHe HIGH - 5 million TUWC - 11 y o pan corridors in all areas of the Tualatin River watershed No and up Policy 74 C U, N 1. Funding Amount: Scale of funding for associated projects NIGH - 5 million and up w MEDIUM - 12 million to 5 million LOW - Under 1 milion 2. Funding Timing: SHORT TERM: 0-5 years. MID TERM: 5-15 years or LONG TERM: Beyond 15 years 3. Identified Needs: SERVICE NEED: 10- minute walk of a park trail, or natural area DEVELOPMENT COMPLEMENT: Parks. trails and natural resource investments can support higher density housing and provide links to transit and neighborhood services. LAND ACQUISITION: Assemble and Acquire large parcels - Parks greater than 5 acres are desirable. CONNECTIVITY access to nature both along the trails and by connecting parks and natural areas WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY STREAMS AND RIPARIAN HEALTH WILDLIFE HABITAT WILDLIFE CROSSING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT: LID(Ajs URBAN FOREST Canopy — Trees 4. Project Size 5- SMALL_ is under an acre. M - MEDIUM is 1 acre to 5 acres L - LARGE is more than 5 acres Note 1: Projects highlighted in blue are representative of a policy for use in the SW Corridor. Note 2 • Project highlighted with yes responses for Screening Question - Supports Local Land Use Goals received support from Project Partners as complementing land use plans. Generally, these are all low impact, resource preserving projects. •s Note 3 : Projects are generally deemed as having no impacts because they are low impact. resource preserving projects. Attachment B III i City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Mayor Cook and City Council From: Judith Gray Re: Draft Recommendation for Southwest Corridor Plan Date: June 6, 2013 At the June 10 Steering Committee meeting, Metro project managers will present a draft recommendation for Phase 1 of the Southwest Corridor Plan. This recommendation was developed in coordination with staff from partner agencies known as the Project Team Leaders (PTL) committee. I am Tigard's PTL representative and support the PTL draft recommendation. I have attached the latest draft PTL Recommendation for your information. I expect there to be changes in formatting, context, etc. but any changes in the recommendations would only be at the direction of the Steering Committee. Key elements of the draft recommendation include: Transit (starts on Page 6) 1. Local transit service improvements are a priority. TriMet should begin working with local communities on a Southwest Service Enhancement Plan, which will identify near term transit improvements. 2. High Capacity Transit (HCT) mode: the preliminary analysis did not reveal a clear "winner" in the evaluation of Light Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). It is recommended that both modes be evaluated further. 3. HCT Destination: Both LRT and BRT should be evaluated for the corridor connecting Portland to Tualatin, via Tigard. 4. The following alignment options are not recommended for evaluation in Phase 2: • BRT with a final destination in Tigard is not recommended as a separate option, but will be considered as a segment of the BRT to Tualatin option. • BRT to Sherwood is not recommended for further evaluation. This decision is based on projected demand and costs, among other findings. This has concurrence with City of Sherwood representatives. • The "Hub and Spoke" option is not recommended for further evaluation due to operational inefficiencies of providing multiple "single seat" rides. Local service connections identified in the Service Enhancement Plan will be considered instead. Roadway and Active Transportation (starts on Page 8) The draft recommendation narrowed the comprehensive list of roadway and active transportation projects (essentially, the combined transportation plans for all project partners) and identified those projects that best meet the purpose of the Southwest Corridor Plan. Inclusion in the Southwest Corridor Plan does not guarantee funding nor does it commit any partners to specific obligations. However, in light of severe constraints and sharply competitive environment for transportation funding, inclusion in the plan demonstrates a degree of regional vetting and should provide some strategic and political support for future funding efforts. A few key projects within Tigard are: • Ash Avenue Railroad Crossing; • Hunziker /Scoffins Realignment at Hall • Hwy 217 Overcrossing at Hunziker Upcoming Meetings June 10, 9:30 -11:30 a.m. Steering Committee Meeting Tigard library Community Room June 25, 7:30 p.m. Tigard City Council Business Meeting Project update; opportunity for public testimony June 26, 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Community Planning Forum Tigard library Community Room July 8, 9:30 -11:30 a.m. Steering Committee Meeting Metro Council Chambers July 16, 6:30 p.m. Tigard City Council Workshop Project update, if needed July 22, 9:30 -11:30 a.m. Steering Committee Meeting Tigard library Community Room c: Marty Wine, City Manager Kenny Asher, Community Development Director Attachments: Draft PTL Recommendation III TIGARD City of Tigard June 17, 2013 Attachment C Mayor John Cook and Tigard City Council 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Support for future High Capacity Transit service in Tigard Dear Mayor Cook and Members of Council, We, the members of the Tigard Planning Commission, are writing to express our support for the City of Tigard's on -going pursuit of high capacity transit (HCT) service in Tigard and continued participation in the Southwest Corridor Plan. The expected growth in Tigard and surrounding communities will make current traffic congestion even worse. Increased housing pressure could threaten some of the established neighborhoods in Tigard. HCT should be part of Tigard's strategy to encourage new housing and other development opportunities in the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard. By focusing growth and investment in these areas, many of Tigard's established neighborhoods can be preserved. This outcome reflects the land use concepts developed as part of the Tigard HCT Land Use Plan. On July 8, the Steering Committee will consider a draft recommendation to move into Phase 2 of the Southwest Corridor Plan. The latest draft recommendation directs further analysis of two HCT modes: light rail and bus rapid transit. Both options would be considered with connections from Downtown Portland to Tualatin, with stations in the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard. We agree that both modes need more detailed analysis of costs, ridership, and other key factors. We support this proposal and recommend that Mayor Cook vote in support of the recommendation. Sincerely, Tom Anderson Jason . • ers Planning Commission President . ng Commission Vice President 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard- or.gov Page 1 oft / I ••••11111111111r ��� - Commissioner A;Atir/ktf a Shat Commissioner 15 on Schmidt /_ ommissioner Calista F' zgerald Co . - '• . ems- • +.. Comm slioner Margare Commissioner Brian Fe ey C Commismothy Gaschke Page 2 of 2 P1' I. TIGARD City of Tigard June 6, 2013 Mayor John Cook and Tigard City Council 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Support for future High Capacity Transit service in Tigard Dear Mayor Cook and Members of Council, On behalf of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC), I am pleased to express our support for the City of Tigard's continued efforts to pursue future high capacity transit (HCT) service for the citizens of Tigard. Throughout much of 2011 and 2012, TTAC served as the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Tigard HCT Land Use Plan. The Plan identified the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard as areas well- suited for increased residential and commercial land uses, along with amenities and services that help create a complete urban neighborhood. In order to achieve that land use vision, Tigard must have an efficient transportation system with travel options that are safe and convenient. High capacity transit should be a part of that vision. We are pleased that Tigard is actively and effectively engaged in the Southwest Corridor Plan, which respects Tigard's priorities in the following important ways: • Each of the proposed HCT alignment alternatives exit Barbur Blvd before crossing I -5, respecting Tigard concerns about traffic capacity on Pacific Highway; and, • Each of the proposed HCT alignments provides a direct connection to the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard, respecting the land use vision in the HCT Land Use Plan. On this basis, TTAC finds the Southwest Corridor Plan has been an effective collaboration that respects Tigard's interests. We urge your continued involvement and look forward to participating in future phases of the planning effort. Sincerely, t Steve Bass, Chair Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard- or.gov June 12, 2013 Mayor John Cook and Tigard City Council 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Support for future High Capacity Transit service in Tigard Dear Mayor Cook and Members of Council, On behalf of the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC), I am pleased to express our support for the City of Tigard's continued efforts to pursue future high capacity transit (HCT) service for the citizens of Tigard. The Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan and the City Center Urban Renewal Plan envision the development of a vibrant mixed -use urban village in the downtown core. An IICT alignment which serves the Downtown would further that goal, making the area more attractive for transit - oriented residential and mixed -use development. The Tigard HCT Land Use Plan also identified the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard as ideal sites for higher density residential and commercial land uses, providing the amenities and services that foster the growth of a dynamic urban neighborhood. To achieve these land use visions, Tigard must have an efficient, safe and convenient transportation system. High capacity transit is identified as a part of that vision. The CCAC believes it is important to consider the comparative impact of both Light Rail Transit and Bus Rapid Transit on development in the downtown area. We therefore recommend that the steering committee continue studying both options. Our commission supports Tigard's active and effective engagement in the Southwest Corridor Plan, which respects our city's priorities in the following important ways: • Each of the proposed HCT alignment alternatives exit Barbur Blvd before crossing I -5, respecting Tigard concerns about traffic capacity on Pacific Highway; • Both proposed HCT alignments provide a direct connection to the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard, respecting the vision of the HCT Land Use Plan. On this basis, the CCAC finds the Southwest Corridor Plan has been an influential collaboration that respects Tigard's interests and is cognizant of the goals of downtown urban renewal. We urge your continued involvement and look forward to participating in future phases of the planning effort. Sine -fly, �/ p , i I �j,{ / / 4 C/ ✓c= / aLL'(/� Elise Shearer, Chair City Center Advisory Commission Attachment D Southwest Corridor & High Capacity Transit City of Tigard Web Questionnaire The City of Tigard held a Town Hall meeting on April 30 intended to provide a forum for community dialogue. Though multiple topics were raised, the majority of the meeting was focused on the potential for high capacity transit service in Tigard. As a follow -up to the Town Hall, a few questions were posted to the City of Tigard web site. These questions follow along the vein of the discussion from the Town Hall. The questions were posted between May 7 and June 5. In total, 27 responses were received. Their responses are briefly summarized below. 1. In your view, is traffic congestion still the most important issue facing Tigard? Yes 67% No 33% 2. Do you support either light rail or bus rapid transit serving Tigard if it will help keep traffic volumes on Pacific Highway from increasing significantly? Yes 73% No 27% 3. What two or three factors do you think are the most important to consider in making a decision about high capacity transit? 16 14 14 14 12 12 12 10 9 8 7 6 4 2 0 C� Q` a\ ` .Fe `a � \c �CQ ea 4`at e• °Q ,a\ • Od e • ec* �p ° While this relatively small number of responses does not provide a statistically significant sample, the web survey provided an opportunity for citizen input, especially among people unable to attend or uncomfortable speaking at public meetings. These findings are generally consistent with responses to the 2011 Community Attitudes Survey, which identified traffic congestion as the primary concern among Tigard residents and showed that 60% of respondents support light rail in Tigard. For more information, contact Judith Gray at judith@a.tigard- or.gov. AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: June 25, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY SIGN -UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: DISCUSSION ON DRAFT RECOMMENDATION TO SW CORRIDOR PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose a Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: June 25, 2013 PLEASE PRINT Proponent — (Speaking In Favor) Opponent — (Speaking Against) Neutral Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. UtLl f iTtlar14 ) 7 3 5v) 6oI una 71( 0AID 0 2 6 11223 Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. Name, Address & Phone No. AIS -1355 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: River Terrace Discussion - Commercial Component Submitted By: Darren Wyss, Community Development Council Business Meeting - Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Main Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE What did revisiting the River Terrace commercial component reveal about changed market conditions? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Council is requested to receive briefing from staff, ask questions and provide input and direction. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Staff is currently working on translating the concept plan land uses to Tigard zoning as part of the River Terrace Community Plan process. During this discussion, some stakeholders suggested the city would be wise to alter the location of some land use elements, particularly the neighborhood commercial component. The council was given presentations on this subject on May 14th and 21st and provided staff with feedback and direction to update the commercial market analysis completed as part of the concept plan and provide vis»alizations of what a development could look like at this location in today's market. Staff has contracted with two consultant firms to provide the information requested by council and they are expediting the projects. The final work products will be complete and distributed in council's Thursday packet on June 20, 2013. The city of Beaverton has also completed the initial market analysis for the South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area and it is attached. The findings show the market can support approximately 100,000 square feet of retail on 6.5 acres of net developable acres. There has been no discussion or decision to this point with stakeholders on whether all the retail would be contained in one location or spread among different neighborhoods. Staff will present the findings from the consultant work and engage council in a discussion focused on: 1. Do we now have enough information to confirm the concept plan is what the city wants to implement regarding the neighborhood commercial location? 2. What will serve the city best? 3. Do we have enough information to wrap -up the zoning task and move on to infrastructure master planning and financing? OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Complete River Terrace Community Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION April 23, 2013 - Council Workshop May 14, 2013 - Council Study Session May 21, 2013 - Council Workshop Fiscal Impact Cost: $134,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department /program): CD Additional Fiscal Notes: Washington County transferred CET funds to the city for completing the community plan. The city has applied for additional CET funds for specific infrastructure master planning and financing strategy tasks. Attachments SCM Market Analysis River Terrace Market Analysis ECONorthwest ECONOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING DATE: May 29, 2013 ECO Project #: 21286 TO: Angelo Planning Group FROM: ECONorthwest SUBJECT: SOUTH COOPER MOUNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN - MARKET STUDY Introduction The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a forecast of the mix and amount of future residential and commercial development that meets planning goals for the South Cooper Mountain (SCM) Concept Planning area and is viable considering market realities in the area. This memorandum includes an evaluation of relevant market conditions, demographics and development patterns, and a summary of input from developers, and identifies one possible development program that meets the criteria above, based on the information gathered to date. The SCM Concept Plan will establish a vision that serves as a long -term guide for future growth and development of the SCM area. The Concept Planning process provides an opportunity to identify long -term needs of the area and proactively address future challenges. This process will recognize the unique needs of the three distinct subareas: North Cooper Mountain (NCM), the Urban Reserve Area (URA), and the South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area (SCMAA), while developing a holistic understanding of how the three areas could integrate and grow sustainably. The concept plan area totals 2,290 acres. Community plans identifying appropriate comprehensive plan and zoning designations that implement the overall vision in the concept plan will be developed for the areas that are currently within the urban growth boundary (UGB). The South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area Community Plan will designate specific areas for a range of housing types and densities, commercial and civic uses, and parks; preserve natural resources; provide for green infrastructure; and plan for new utilities, streets, trails and paths. The North Cooper Mountain Community Plan will reflect the needs of current residents in this already developed area, and result in an appropriate plan for the area's future. Planning for the Urban Reserve Area will guide how best to protect natural areas and Cooper Mountain Nature Park, identify where future urban development may occur, and where connecting streets, water lines, and other utilities should be located. A Finance Plan will identify realistic strategies for paying for infrastructure to serve the area. Methods In this section we describe the steps and methods used in this memorandum. See attachment A for our baseline evaluation of socio- demographic trends. • Understanding of overall housing needs. Our analysis began with a literature review of relevant documents, and conversations with local and regional policy makers and ECONorthwest I Portland 503.222.6060 I Eugene 541.687.0051 I econw.com 1 stakeholders. This background analysis provided an understanding of overall housing needs for South Cooper Mountain, and the City of Beaverton as a whole. • Evaluate socio- demographic and market trends. We identified a competitive market area (CMA), defined as the existing neighborhoods adjacent to the SCM Concept Plan area. We described the households and housing in the CMA and compared them to households in Beaverton. We estimated the households projected to come to the CMA, by income and tenure, and used those projections to estimate the demanded housing by price (both ownership and rental) in the SCM Concept Plan area. • Compare baseline forecast to Metro target. Based on the socio- demographic and market trends, we created a "baseline scenario" showing what development pattern would be most likely to occur in the SCMAA if recent trends in the CMA continued. This allowed us to calculate the difference between the amount and mix of residential demand identified in the baseline scenario, and the desired amount (and implied mix) of residential demand that is necessary to meet policy goals of Metro and the City of Beaverton. • Convene a Real Estate Market Focus Group. The Real Estate Market Focus Group was convened on May 8, 2013 to address the identified "gap" between the baseline scenario and the density necessary to achieve the Metro target for housing units in the SCMAA. The Focus Group included representatives of development companies with experience in Washington County, property owners in the SCM Concept Plan area, and affordable housing experts. • Examine recent comparable developments. We contacted individual developers on the Real Estate Market Focus Group to better understand recent higher - density developments in the suburban Portland market. These case studies of recent comparable developments confirmed the market feasibility of development types to be included in the development program. • Conduct a retail market study. We reviewed historical market data on retailers in the surrounding area. Additionally, we examined spending patterns for existing residents in the surrounding area. This analysis helps to identify how much retail space should be included in the development program. • Create the development program. The culmination of our efforts was a development program, which identifies specific types of development, the average density of each development type, and the percent of units, number of units, and acreage dedicated to each development type. Understanding of overall housing need A housing needs study for the City of Beaverton, conducted as part of the Civic Plan, identified a deficit of land for housing in the City. The largest gap between projected demand and capacity within the former (pre -SCMAA annexation) city limits was for single- family housing units (a deficit of roughly 3,000 units). The Civic Plan Housing Strategy also identifies a gap of South Cooper Mountain ECON orthwest May 29, 2013 2 Market Study roughly 1,200 multifamily units and 800 townhomes. Efforts to reinvest in the Central City were identified to address the City's need for additional multifamily and townhome housing stock. However, a limited supply of land elsewhere in the city (other than the SCM Concept Plan area), makes the single - family housing type especially important for the SCM Concept Plan area. As a condition of bringing the SCMAA into the UGB, Metro established a target number of housing units that the area should be planned and zoned to accommodate (4,651). This target was based on early assumptions about buildable lands, and Metro representatives have indicated that this number may be revised based on more detailed buildable lands information and natural resource protection strategies developed as part of the Concept Planning process. The target number assumed an overall net residential density of approximately 15 units per net acre on the land thought to be buildable. Overview of socio - demographic and market trends Socio- demographic trends are important in developing a baseline development program, because the baseline is developed under the assumption that the demand for housing in the SCM Concept Plan area over the next 20+ years will likely be from households that resemble the existing households in adjacent neighborhoods. This assumption is based on the similar locational attributes and community amenities shared by the Concept Plan area and adjacent existing neighborhoods. The map on the following page shows the boundary of the Competitive Market Area (CMA) that was used to identify the adjacent neighborhoods that would be the best indicator of future demand in the SCM Concept Plan area for the baseline development program. Additionally, the map shows the boundary of the Retail Sub - Market Area that was used for the retail portion of the market study, discussed later in this document. 1 Beaverton's Civic Plan, Housing & Neighborhoods Strategy, adopted by Beaverton City Council April 12, 2011. z South Cooper Mountain Prospectus, June 1, 2011. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 3 Market Study Beaverton South Cooper Mountain Concept & Community Plans -- Hillsboro V 1 _• . 1111111 111111111111111111111111 • ! r. 10 _ •- • 1 ♦♦ • • • • • • t • • • • *• ii i \ li t s• , ' •• • • • • • airs.... • • • • • i.,ar 4 ;Tigard i • • cJ 2t� I a_'-- • � Y ' 1 , I � • �i .a.t . i .... 219 • —1' _ ■ . a . .: 1 ° King Cit -1 i t '" Pit, -- t:' Pi•i I i I � l ! _'3 . . i �� Tualatin Market Areas Used for Residential and Commercial Market Analysis Legend f.".; Retail Sub - Market Boundary Rivers (__i Beaverton (_:i Tualatin ; Competitive Market Area Route Type Li Hillsboro gii Rural reserves ❑ South Cooper Mountain Study Area State Rotues l_•i King City Urban reserves j7., Urban Growth Boundary Major Roads (=:i Tigard Prepared By: ECONorthwest Date: 4/24/2013 Coordirote System: NAD 1983 BARN StateRane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl DISCLAIMER 0 3,000 6,000 This map is intended for informational mimosas only It is rat intended for legal engineering. or surveying purposes Whoa this map represents the beet data available at the time of publication Me City of Beaverton makes no clans, I I Feet representations. of wav /antics as to as accuracy or romplotenes.t. Moladala available upon request. N II South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 4 Market Study Findings Attachment A: Socio- demographic Trends for South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan Area, provides a detailed look at socio- demographic and market trends for the SCM Concept Plan area. In this section, we highlight the most important findings for our analysis. • Households in the CMA are more highly educated and have higher income than households in the City of Beaverton as a whole. The CMA has a relatively high portion of children. It has a large portion of individuals over the age of 45, in the latter half of their working lives. • A large portion of the households in the CMA own their home, much higher than in Beaverton as a whole. • About two- thirds of the houses in the CMA are single - family detached housing. About 10% of the homes are townhouses, and the remainder are multifamily units. • The existing development pattern in the CMA attracts upper middle class households looking for an affluent suburban lifestyle. Likely homebuyers in the SCM Concept Plan area will be households similar to those in the CMA. • To accommodate a housing mix that has relatively high levels of attached housing (i.e., greater than 50 %) South Cooper Mountain will need to have sufficient urban amenities - parks, walk -able streets, neighborhood shopping, and potentially transit. • The SCM Concept Plan area is well suited to meet part of the city's need for detached single - family homes, given its position on the western edge of an affluent part of Beaverton. Exhibit 1 illustrates the breakdown of future demand for housing in the CMA (including the Concept Plan area) by tenure and household income. The demand forecast used Nielsen Claritas data, based on recent demographic trends in the CMA, and extending those trends forward for the next five years. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 5 Market Study Exhibit 1. Projected demand for housing by tenure and household income, CMA, 2013 -2018. 16% O Renter Occupied 14% • Owner Occupied 12% 10% 3% ® 1% 2% -_ LEI I 8% I 6% 4% 3% 2% 2 % 11 1111 ■ ...,- 0% Less than $15,000- $25,000- $35,000- $50,000- $75,000- $100,000- $125,000- $150,000- $200,000- $250,000- $500,000 or $15,000 $24,999 $34,999 $49,999 $74,999 $99,999 $124,999 $149,999 $199,999 $249,999 $499,999 more Total Household Income Comparison of baseline forecast to Metro target Exhibit 2 shows how the projected demographic composition of new households shown in Exhibit 1 translates into demand for six different housing types defined in the South Cooper Mountain Prospectus. This is a baseline scenario that reflects the likely development pattern based on historical trends. The baseline scenario is a starting place for our analysis, and not the final conclusion. When considering the baseline forecast, one should keep in mind the following caveats. The baseline scenario does not: • Reflect a specific community vision for the SCM Concept Plan area. • Account for specific public policies and zoning that could be adopted and applied to SCM. • Recognize the differences between the three subareas: NCM, URA, and SCMAA. • Assume that the area (located on the urban edge) will be able to provide amenities offered in the urban core. The baseline scenario assumes that the value of a house increases with the size of the house and lot. Households with lower incomes will be able to afford the denser neighborhood types and households with higher incomes will be able to afford the less dense neighborhood types. The continuation of current demographic conditions assumed in the baseline scenario analysis would mean that expected growth in demand would be primarily from households seeking to own their home. The SCM Concept Plan area, adjacent to an existing low- density and affluent area, would continue to attract similar households, who would likely prefer larger lot homes. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 6 Market Study Exhibit 2. Expected proportional demand for housing units by neighborhood type, South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area, baseline scenario Neighborhood Types High- Density Urban Urban Compact Standard Low Density Executive Neighborhood Neighborhood Residential Residential Residential Housing Owner Occupied 0.3% 6.8% 21.2% 16.9% 24.5% 8.4% Rented 3.0% 3.0% 6.6% 5.8% 2.4% 1.2% Total 3.3% 9.7% 27.8% 22.7% 26.9% 9.6% Exhibit 2 shows expected proportional demand for the entire SCM Concept Plan area, including NCM, the URA, and the SCMAA. The distribution of expected demand by housing type should take differences between these three areas into consideration. NCM is largely developed and platted, and the URA cannot be developed in the near future. Additionally, these subareas have topographic features that will limit their ability to provide land for dense housing. The slopes and streams in those areas make them well suited for lower - density housing that incorporates those natural features into an attractive amenity. The SCMAA has topographical constraints as well, but to a lesser degree. Assigning the majority of higher - density housing types to the SCMAA allows a more efficient use of land across the entire SCM Concept Plan area. Although the SCMAA may be expected to provide a somewhat different mix of housing /neighborhood types than other parts of the Concept Plan area, for the purposes of creating a "baseline" market forecast for the SCMAA, we started by applying the projected mix of units shown in Exhibit 2 to the 4,651 units targeted by Metro for the SCMAA. Exhibit 3 shows how the assumed distribution of demand by neighborhood type (Exhibit 2) would translate into numbers of housing units and the total acres of net developable land needed in the SCMAA to accommodate the baseline program for 4,651 units. Exhibit 3. Baseline housing mix assumptions, net developable acres of land needed to accommodate Metro target for total units, South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area Unit Type % of Total Units Units / Acre Acres High- Density Urban Neighborhood 3.3% 153 44.7 3.4 Urban Neighborhood 9.7% 451 22.4 20.1 Compact Residential 27.8% 1,293 14.6 88.6 Standard Residential 22.7% 1,056 11.2 94.3 Low - Density Residential 26.9% 1,251 4.3 290.9 Executive Housing 9.6% 446 2.8 159.3 Total 100.0% 4,651 7.1 656.6 Source: ECONorthwest and Angelo Planning Group Unit type descriptions and densities are from South Cooper Mountain Prospectus, June 1, 2011. Neighborhood types are described in the South Cooper Mountain Prospectus. The relevant pages that describe and illustrate these types are included as Attachment B. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 7 Market Study Reviewing the projections in Exhibit 3 show an obvious disconnect between the density of the development pattern forecast in the baseline scenario, and the density necessary to achieve the amount of residential development desired by Metro and the City of Beaverton. Preliminary evaluation of this "gap" found: • The mix of housing/neighborhood types identified by the baseline market program would translate to an average net density of approximately seven dwelling units per acre. • The SCMAA contains 544 gross acres. The draft Buildable Lands Inventory for South Cooper Mountain found that only 364 acres of land in the SCMAA would be buildable, after accounting for land with steep slopes, wetlands, stream corridors, and other constraints. Of the 364 gross buildable acres, it is estimated that 27% would be set aside for future infrastructure needs, leaving 255 net developable acres. After accounting for future schools, parks and commercial areas, it is estimated that only 230 net developable acres will be available for residential development in the SCMAA. • Applying the housing mix identified in the baseline market program (Exhibit 3) to the number of housing units targeted by Metro for the South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area would require roughly 657 net buildable acres for residential development. • To accommodate the number of units targeted by Metro on 230 net developable acres would require an average net density of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre — roughly triple the density identified in the baseline market program, and significantly higher than the roughly 15 dwelling units per acre envisioned by Metro when they established the target. Real Estate Market Focus Group Input ECONorthwest, Angelo Planning Group, and the City of Beaverton convened a Real Estate Market Focus Group, to solicit input on the baseline scenario, and discuss potential changes to the development program shown in Exhibit 3 that could achieve Metro's density goals, while remaining attractive for private development. Participants in the Real Estate Market Focus Group included: • Fred Gast, Polygon Northwest Company; • Mimi Doukas, Venture Properties Incorporated; • Justin Wood, Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland; • Matthew Grady, Gramor Development; • Matt Wellner, Metropolitan Land Group; • Ramsey Weit, Community Housing Fund 4 The draft Buildable Lands Inventory dated May 24, 2013 is preliminary and subject to change. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 8 Market Study • Ed Bartholemy, property owner • City of Beaverton staff; • Metro staff; • Angelo Planning Group staff; and • ECONorthwest staff. At this meeting, we discussed the following questions: • Are there any specific reasons why existing development patterns in the surrounding neighborhoods might not be the best indicator of demand for future development in South Cooper Mountain? • Are there trends that make the CMA methodology only part of the story? For example, what about senior housing or seniors moving to a smaller home that still want to stay in Beaverton? • What do recent development patterns within the CMA tell us about short -term development prospects in South Cooper Mountain? (i.e., within the CMA, does housing built in the last 5 -10 years reflect the overall housing mix, or does it suggest changing preferences ?) • What are the best comparable areas to base short -term (0 -5 years) and longer -term (5 -20 years) demand? Where should we be looking other than the CMA? • What are specific reasons to justify an emphasis on attached dwelling units rather than detached units in South Cooper Mountain? • What actions and investments (e.g., parks, transit service, retail space) could be taken to achieve a more dense development pattern in South Cooper Mountain? • Looking at the baseline development mix, do you think such a mix will be achievable in South Cooper Mountain? How might the mix be revised to find the right balance of market and target density? The Focus Group discussed what the area would need to provide to attract the level of density to achieve the city's and Metro's policy goals, and generally came to agreement on the following points: • The SCMAA is a desirable location for residential development, and offering a mix of housing products will allow households with a variety of income levels to locate in the area. • Single - family houses located on 3,000 to 5,000 SF lots would be very attractive to the market. There is strong demand in the area for that housing type. • There is a market for townhome and cottage housing around 15 dwelling units per net acre, but there are upper limits on how much of this type is appropriate in the SCM Concept Plan area, and the SCMAA. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 9 Market Study • The highest achievable market -rate density is about 32 dwelling units per acre. The lack of public transportation and other urban amenities limit marketable densities to 32 units per acre and lower. At this density, parking can be built on the ground level, tucked under the structure. Units for sale in comparable suburban developments are priced between $170,000 and $200,000. This higher - density product should be a smaller component of the total housing mix. • Although there is demand for "executive housing" and very large lots, this housing type does not need to be provided within the SCMAA, but could be provided in the URA and NCM. • Workforce housing is consistent with project goals and regional policy. Workforce housing projects are typically about 50 units /acre. Incentives will be needed for this type of housing to be built. • To accommodate a housing mix that has relatively high levels of attached housing, SCMAA will need to have sufficient urban amenities: parks, walkable streets, neighborhood shopping, and potentially transit. • From Metro's viewpoint, there is some flexibility in the target of 4,651 units set for the SCMAA. Natural resource protection, and updated environmental mapping, will be considered. Focusing on the target density of roughly 15 units per net acre is more prudent than focusing on the targeted total number of dwelling units. Evaluation of recent comparable developments The Focus Group participants suggested an analysis of recent new developments, to understand the market for different densities, including the cost of construction and the market value. We reviewed three developments: Arbor Oaks in North Bethany, 45° Central on the north side of Beaverton, and Timberland, north of Highway 26 on 118th. The Arbor Oaks development in North Bethany is all single - family detached housing. The homes range in size from about 1,700 SF to 2,500 SF, and are priced between $312,000 and $453,000. The development lies adjacent to a new elementary school. The plans for the area include pockets of retail, but they have not yet been built. At this time, the area does not provide a mix of densities and has limited product built. At this stage, the development offers homogenous product and offers little insight into demand for high densities in a suburban market. 45° Central includes detached and attached ownership housing. The single- family houses are detached, 3 -story structures priced up to the mid- $300,000s. Although ownership is fee simple, the houses do not include private yard space. The yard, gardens, play areas, pool, and other green space are commonly owned and maintained by the Home Ownership Association. The multifamily units are in 4 -story buildings with 20 units per building, and are priced up to $185,000. In an interview with the developer, he reported that the company does not plan to build 4 -story structures in the future. Although the structures are wood - frame, the height South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 10 Market Study requires more infrastructure, such as elevators, making it costlier than 3 -story structures. The multifamily product is about 24 units per acre, and the developer believes that that density can be achieved with 3 -story structures. The development is much more centrally located than the SCMAA. It is very close to large employers (Nike and Tektronix), it has good access to both light rail and bus transit, and the extensive retail services on SW Cedar Hills Boulevard. At this time, 45° Central is only partially built, but is selling well. Timberland will have about 553 homes and a small commercial center. It includes 2- bedroom flats and 2- bedroom townhomes priced from about $146,000 to $227,000. Located on NW 118th Avenue, between Cornell and Barnes roads, it is about a mile from the Sunset Transit Center, and less than a 10- minute drive to downtown Portland. It does not currently include retail in the development, but the developer has plans to have 90,000 SF of retail anchored by a 40,000 SF grocery store by the end 2014. These developments offer insight into potential development in the SCMAA. A key feature is proximity to services. They do not include retail in the development, but are located close to retail goods and services, and have plans to build retail in the future. Located on the north side of Beaverton, they have good access into Portland and transit. Their marketing focuses on that proximity to employment centers and transit. The available units have a wide range of prices, appropriate for a mixed - density product with close proximity to services attractive to households with a broad range of income. Progress Ridge is the Metro - designated "Town Center" to the east of SCMAA. The Progress Ridge TownSquare commercial development offers extensive retail, including a New Seasons Market, Cinetopia, restaurants, and other retail. The commercial development totals 214,000 SF; the New Seasons Market accounts for 42,000 SF of that total. Multiple developers have built the residential development around the TownSquare. The residential component includes townhouses as well as apartments and condominiums. Average net densities for both the townhome and multi - family components were 22 -23 units per acre. The rental component includes one, two, and three - bedroom apartments, ranging in rent from $825 to $1,420. The condominiums in the area have broadly ranged prices, from less than $50,000 (for short sales) to over $350,000. Retail Market Study Demand for future retail depends on the demand for goods and services from the new and existing households and the supply of existing retail facilities in the nearby vicinity. To conduct 5 ECONorthwest was unable to reach representatives of the development, and used internet sources to describe the project. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 11 Market Study this analysis, we defined a Retail Sub - Market Area (RSA), shown previously in the map on page 4 of this document. Retail Sub - Market Area Trends The RSA has seen substantial growth in retail space since 2006. It grew from about 500,000 SF to about 800,000 in the seven -year period. The majority of the new space came onto the market in 2011, with the Progress Ridge TownSquare development. Exhibit 4 shows the vacancy rate (right axis) and the net absorption (left axis) for the retail sub - market. The data show that vacancies in the area were quite low until 2008, when the economy experienced a strong downturn. The sub - market saw another shift in 2011. Net absorption and vacancies increase. This is because rentable building area increased as the new space at Progress Ridge TownSquare (214,000 SF) became available. Although the new development has attracted new retailers to the area, the new space has not been completely absorbed. Also, existing retailers may move to the new space and abandon older retail space, creating vacancies in that older space. The data for 2012 show that net absorption has been negative— indicating a decrease in demand from 2011. Exhibit 4. South Cooper Mountain Retail Sub - Market Area, Retail Absorption and Vacancy, 2006 to 2013 160,000 16% Net Absorption 140,000 Vacancy Rate ♦ - 14% 120,000 12% 100,000 - 10% 80,000 60000 8% g 40,000 - 6% 20,000 r - 4% 20000 I ' - 2% -40,000 0% 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 1Q 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 1Q 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 1Q 3Q Source: ECONorthwest and CoStar. Exhibit 5 shows triple rent (NNN) rents for the RSA, as reported by commercial real estate brokers. The data show that rents jumped at the end of 2008, declined over the course of 2009, and have held relatively steady since then, at around $25 per SF. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 12 Market Study Exhibit 5. South Cooper Mountain Retail Sub - Market Area, Retail Rents (NNN), 2006 to 2013 $33 - -- $28 — $23 $18 $13 $8 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 1Q 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q 10 3Q Source: ECONorthwest and CoStar. Accessibility to a retail location is important, as it establishes drive times to the site. A center with good access will be able to draw from a larger area. The SCMAA is limited because it is at the edge of the urban growth boundary. There are few households to the west that can be potential retail customers. Households in the existing developed area to the east have substantial existing retail opportunities. Existing retail is experiencing 14% vacancy rates, higher than a 10% vacancy rate generally considered as a point of equilibrium for the retail market. The addition of Progress Ridge has brought new retail to the area, expanding supply of square footage and individual retailers. The competitive position of a retail location affects its ability to draw customers. A potential customer will drive further for a more attractive retail opportunity, which is why larger shopping centers typically draw from a wider trade area. Costumers will not pass by more or equally attractive retail opportunities to reach a less convenient option. The existing concentrations of retail at Progress Ridge and elsewhere in Beaverton make it unlikely that consumers would travel west, past these existing centers, to shop at the SCMAA. Retail in the SCMAA will need to be primarily supported by the population in the Concept Planning area. Some households from the neighboring River Terrace area in Tigard will choose to purchase retail goods and services in SCMAA, if the commercial development in SCMAA is located with convenient access on major arterials with good visibility. Similarly, some SCMAA residents will shop in River Terrace if it is convenient and /or a particular store or amenity draws them there. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 13 Market Study Estimate of demand for retail space To estimate demand for retail in the SCMAA, we relied on estimated expenditures of existing households in the RSA. Exhibit 6 shows the estimated expenditures by retail category for the households in the RSA. The table shows retail categories that could locate in neighborhood - level retail space. It excludes expenditures on automobiles, gasoline, and non -store items (such as internet sales). The existing households in the RSA spend about $32,000 per year on these retail goods and services. The portion of household expenditures on neighborhood retail varies widely, based on availability of retail, how accessible it is, and the appeal of the retail to nearby households. The table shows a range of estimates of the portion of total retail purchases made at local stores (the Neighborhood Retail Purchases Ratio). Based on our experience with other areas, we show the lower estimate at 10% and the upper at 20% of the selected retail categories. We converted total local retail sales to an estimate of retail square feet, based on mean sales per SF, as reported by the Urban Land Institute. The final step of the estimate was to multiply the individual household demand by the projected number of households in the entire South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area. A preliminary estimate of the total number of households that may eventually locate in the Concept Plan area could be between 4,000 and 6,000 households. 6 6 This estimate is preliminary and subject to change. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 14 Market Study Exhibit 6. South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area, projected demand for retail space based on expenditures by households in Retail Sub - Market Area Expenses per Retail Category Household Food Stores $6,075 Health and Personal Care Stores $2,273 Drinking and Eating Establishments $5,423 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores $2,578 Sportng Goods, Hobby, Musical Inst Stores $752 Book, Periodical and Music Stores $259 Building Materials, Garden Supplies, Furniture $7,306 General Merchandise Stores $6,295 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $1,305 Total Retail Sales $32,266 Neighborhood Retail Purchases Ratio 10% 20% Total Neighborhood Retail Sales $3,227 $6,453 Retail sales per SF of Retail Space $273 $273 Demand for Retail SF per Household 12 24 4,000 Households 47,000 95,000 6,000 Households 71,000 142,000 Source: Nielsen Claritas, Urban Land Institute, and ECONorthwest. Retail sales per SF based on mean sales per SF in the Convenience category as defined by the Urban Land Institute in "Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers 2008 ". The Convenience category includes smaller retail areas, not anchored by a supermarket, and may contain convenience markets, food stores, food services, drug stores, flower shops, beauty shops, and cleaners. We estimate that residential development, at 4,000 households, could support between 47,000 and 95,000 SF of new retail space. At 6,000 households, it could support between 71,000 and 142,000 SF of new retail space. This estimate assumes the majority of purchases (80 % -90 %) by the new households will be outside the SCMAA. For planning purposes, we recommend the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area assume demand for roughly 100,000 SF of retail space. We recommend limiting the amount of planned retail space to ensure the continued success of existing retailers in the area, and prevent the over - building of retail space in the SCMAA. Planning for 100,000 SF of retail space would provide enough space for a new, smaller grocery store (typically 40,000- 50,000 SF) with other smaller retailers nearby, or alternatively, a broad mix of street - oriented retail. Assuming an FAR of 0.35 for new retail development, this would require about 285,000 SF of land, or approximately 6.5 net developable acres. Coordination with River Terrace The amount and location of commercial development in the SCMAA should take into consideration the planned development at River Terrace. Development at River Terrace is planned to include 2,300 housing units, and 25,000 SF of neighborhood commercial space. The River Terrace area is south of Scholl's Ferry Road, and it is likely that its residents will travel along Roy Rogers to access employment centers to the north. Commercial development in both River Terrace and the SCMAA should be coordinated to ensure both areas are successful. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 15 Market Study The planned 25,000 SF of neighborhood commercial space in River Terrace was based on a market study, and sized appropriately to meet the needs of River Terrace residents. This neighborhood commercial center was not assumed to attract demand from outside of the River Terrace development. The ultimate location of the River Terrace neighborhood commercial center is still under consideration, as the market study and concept plan for the area were completed prior to the annexation of the SCMAA, and therefore does not account for development in the SCMAA that could affect the viability of the River Terrace commercial center. Key findings of retail market study The retail market study yields the following key findings: • Adjacent neighborhoods to the West of the SCM Concept Plan area have very strong established retail centers that not only satisfy the needs of local residents, but also attract residents from elsewhere in the region for shopping. It will be very difficult for any new commercial development in the SCMAA to compete with these retail centers, which are of high quality, larger in size, and are closer to the center of the region than the land in the Concept Plan area. • Given the challenge of competing with existing commercial centers, the commercial development in the SCMAA will need to survive based primarily on demand from residents of the SCM Concept Plan area, which could be roughly 4,000 to 6,000 households when the area is fully developed. • The amount and location of commercial development in the SCMAA should take into consideration planned development at River Terrace. Development at River Terrace is planned to include 2,300 housing units, and 25,000 SF of neighborhood commercial space (the amount and location of retail is under discussion at this time). Commercial development in both River Terrace and the SCMAA should be coordinated to ensure both areas are successful. • For planning purposes, we recommend the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area assume demand for approximately 100,000 SF of retail space. Assuming an FAR of 0.5 for new retail development, this would require about 200,000 SF of land, or approximately 4.5 net developable acres. Development program forecast All of the previous steps of the analysis culminate in a possible development program. The development program defines various types of land uses, and identifies the number of units and amount of land dedicated to each use. The development program described in this section is preliminary. It is intended to identify one way to meet planning and policy goals for the SCMAA that is viable considering the market analysis and developer input summarized above; there are other variations that could also meet planning and policy goals and provide a realistic program. The proposed development program may be revised through the scenario analysis part of the SCM Concept Planning process. South Cooper Mountain ECON orthwest May 29, 2013 16 Market Study The basic land uses included in the program are residential and retail. Because the vast majority of the SCM Concept Plan area will be developed as residential, we break down the residential land use into a number of more specific neighborhood types. Residential Neighborhood Types These residential neighborhood types were based off of the South Cooper Mountain Prospectus, but were modified to account for the additional analysis conducted in this market study. • Workforce housing: 50 units / net acre. The SCMAA would likely include a small amount of high- density workforce housing, intended to satisfy demand for employees of nearby retail centers. • Apartments / Condos: 32 units / net acre. The market study found modest demand for multifamily housing development in this area. • Townhomes / Cottages: 16 units / net acre. The market study found modest demand for compact residential (both attached and detached) in this area. This would include a mix of different neighborhood types, ranging from 15 to 18 units per acre, with an average density of 16 units per acre. • Standard Residential: 11 units / net acre. The market study found demand was strongest for this product type, including single- family detached homes on 3,000 to 5,000 SF lots. • Low- Density Residential: 7 units / net acre. The market study found demand for lower - density housing types, but this housing type would be limited in the SCMAA, given the vision for the area, and Metro's density requirements. • Executive Housing: 2.8 units / net acre. The market study found demand for this very low density housing product, but additional input from the Real Estate Market Focus Group determined that this product would not need to be provided in the SCMAA area, to be consistent with the community vision, and Metro's density requirements. SCMAA Development Program Exhibit 7 shows a possible development program for the SCMAA. This development program shows a mix of housing types that is estimated to be supported by market conditions within the roughly 230 acres of net buildable land for residential development. With this mix of neighborhood types, the SCMAA could accommodate 3,100 total units at full build out. While this is significantly below the Metro target of 4,651 units, it would still achieve an average density of 13.4 units per acre, which is an aggressive level of density for a suburban location like the SCMAA, and is close to Metro's target density of about 15 dwelling units per acre. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 17 Market Study Exhibit 7. South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area, Projected Development Program Units / Neighborhood Type % of Total Units Acre Acres Workforce Housing 3.0% 93 50.0 1.9 Apartments / Condos 15.0% 465 32.0 14.5 Townhomes / Cottages 35.0% 1,085 16.0 67.8 Standard Residential 37.0% 1,147 11.2 102.4 Low- Density Residential 10.0% 310 7.0 44.3 Executive Housing 0.0% - 2.8 0.0 Total 100.0% 3,100 13.4 230.9 The most prevalent neighborhood type (in both number of units and total acres) would be standard residential, with close to 1,150 units, and just over 100 net acres of land. Townhomes and cottages would comprise an almost equal share of total units, with 1,085. The remainder of the units would include a significant number of apartments / condos (465 units), a small amount of low- density residential (310 units), and a very small amount of high - density workforce housing (93 units). The SCMAA would not include any executive housing, or any neighborhood types with average density of less than 7 units per net acre. Note that the densities described for each of these product types is based on comparable developments throughout the region, which typically have less constrained land, in terms of steep slopes, wetlands, stream corridors, and other constraints. It is possible that as the SCM Concept Planning effort continues, we could find the challenging configuration of buildable land in the SCMAA results in achievable densities less than what is shown in Exhibit 9. Comments on the URA and NCM development programs The detailed development program above is only for the SCMAA. For the URA and NCM we describe the development program qualitatively. NCM is almost entirely developed or platted for development. Of the 478 total acres in NCM, only 91 acres are estimated to be developable, including 61 acres identified as entirely unconstrained. Approximately 19 of the developable acres are already platted with roughly 1 -acre lots and may be subject to Contracts, Covenants and Restrictions (CC &Rs) that would prevent further subdivision. The remainder are surrounded by neighborhoods that are characterized by single - family, large -lot homes. It is likely that future infill development in NCM would seek to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood, resulting in lower density, single - family, detached housing types, such as the Low - Density Residential and /or Executive Housing neighborhood types described in this study. The URA is largely undeveloped, but has significant constraints. Of the 1,206 total acres in the URA, only 496 acres are estimated to be developable, including 339 acres of entirely unconstrained land. Given the steeper slopes, and the desire to preserve the natural amenities of this area, it is estimated that much of the developable area will be better suited for lower - density housing types. The URA is a relatively large area, and will likely accommodate a broad range of neighborhood types, but the overall mix is likely to result in a lower density than what is forecast for the SCMAA. South Cooper Mountain ECONorthwest May 29, 2013 18 Market Study SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR tlh.�S 3U /? LELAND CONSULTING GROUP (D E OF MEETING) • Memorandum Date June 2013 To Mr. Darren Wyss, City of Tigard From Chris Zahas, Leland Consulting Group April Chastain, Leland Consulting Group Subject River Terrace Commercial Market Analysis Update Project 5415 Tigard River Terrace This memo is an update to the findings provided in the 2 June 2008 technical report prepared by Leland Consulting Group as part of the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan that evaluated the viability of commercial uses and recommended a development program for inclusion in the Concept Plan. This update is appropriate given the changes to the economy since the Plan was originally produced, and revises the 2008 technical memorandum as follows: • Present recent demographic and real estate market data; • Assess the impacts of the South Cooper Mountain planning area; and • Update the recommended development program, both in terms of total size and mix of uses. People Places Prosperity Figure 1 shows the location of the commercial area of the conceptual plan for Area 64, Revitalizing Downtowns which is the topic of discussion for this memo. Creating Partnerships Targeting Real Estate Success Shaping Financial Strategies Strengthening Community Enabling Sustainability & Livability Making Cities Work • 610 SW Alder Street Suite 1008 Portland Oregon 97205 -3611 p 503.222.1600 f 503.222.5078 Los Angeles Califomia Bend Oregon Abilene Texas San Miguel de Allende Mexico www.Ielandconsulting.com A LELAND CONSULTING GROUP ii, Figure 1. West Bull Mountain Concept Plan— Commercial Location •rte,, awe.•ar , ,p ��I d i Z b►.� b . 1l 11 .:,..„,...,.,.., :, . , , i /ij ;•. , , par � �uun oilin shoo,: I num.; a ir. lll nit g1101111111r '— Os III ll Scholls QU Illy NI �.F L' ��uennt . 4 � 1 JI itfi . ham 1 ; � r>.�et - fr '►f /lrlgl I' 1 � ` of t f a n` 4, ` l l oss. r . "11 i •` � o f le L' :i Lorenzo Lanel Roshak Road ��' 40 (pn po realignment and ex tension) PE uiwatiti )4 .. a rdtif: = / /INIItimi It►� i • ittuuunrrr: l 1r' i f 1 r, ____I (k, -1 . + P roposed sip; •••• .�' '� R Terrace `` 3 ' "- ' �� • I a ih; Commercial Nava • L f _ u , i` , g � � �� tli II ! 2 , l (_ _ `.` , :rte 11, : ■` r ulr•n+ + u', i� a� en rurrirtn ■ a — ...._. —_ ._ —w .: t: .3 let4•11:11.1. i ■ ■.� ■■ ■ ��■ = � "' } ' • �� }y :f f r. ■R1.•■■ afr .,.s . aa.,...relfl w I1 • N4. �� ; -. fi,----1"'" : III Source: West Bull Mountain Concept Pier? Report, Washington County, 2010. DEMOGRAPHICS AND COMMERCIAL DEMAND LOCAL DEMOGRAPHICS While much of the demand for the proposed commercial center will come from new development in the study area that has not yet been built, a demographic summary of the surrounding area is useful in characterizing the market area, assuming that new development will share similar demographics to surrounding neighborhoods. The current population within a 10- minute drive time from the northern border of Area 64, the intersection of Roy Rogers Road and Scholls Ferry Road, holds a population that is more affluent than the metro region, the City of Tigard, or the City of Beaverton, with an estimated median household income above $62,000 in 2012. Household sizes in this area are also Page 12 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP 0 larger than the region as a whole or either of the two cities. Higher incomes and larger household sizes indicate, in general, higher retail buying power per household. Table 1. Demographic Conditions, 2012 estimate. 10 min Drive Tigard Beaverton Portland Roy Rogers & MSA Scholls Ferry 2012 Total Population 158,886 48,791 91,524 2,270,258 2012 Average Household Size 2.58 2.49 2.39 2.52 Median Household Income $62,752 $61,301 $55,061 $54,279 Source: ESRI Business Analyst, Leland Consulting Group RETAIL MARKET CONDITIONS The 2008 technical memo reported that two commercial centers were planned or underway, the Village on Scholls Ferry and Progress Ridge Town Square, both of which have since been completed. These two centers are closest in proximity to the proposed commercial area in Area 64 and would provide the most competition for the new site. Figure 2 shows the location of existing retail in purple. Both centers are mostly occupied, although some space is available for lease at both centers, indicating that the market has not yet fully absorbed the new space. According to the First Quarter 2013 Retail Report by brokers Norris Beggs & Simpson, retail trends in the metro region are positive with vacancy rates for retail space currently at 6.5 percent. At 5.78 percent, the Southwest submarket had a lower overall vacancy rate than the region, but also saw negative absorption of 34,000 square feet of space, meaning more space became vacant than was filled (either through the leasing of vacant space or new construction).' Figure 2 shows the location of nearby shopping centers: • Murray Scholls Town Center is a 203,000 square foot retail center completed in 2000 and located on the north side of Scholls Ferry Road west of Murray Boulevard. It is anchored by a Walgreen's drug store and includes a wide range of retailers and restaurants as well as a Beaverton library branch, a Kaiser medical clinic, and a 24- Hour Fitness. It has approximately 12,000 square feet of office space and 1,700 square feet of retail space available. • Murrayhill Marketplace consists of 150,000 total square feet with approximately 27,000 square feet of in -line tenant space available, resulting in an occupancy rate of 82 percent. It is anchored by a 41,000 square foot Safeway. • Progress Ridge Town Square, completed in 2011, is part of a 350,000 square foot entertainment and neighborhood shopping center complex, which extends to the south side of Barrows Road to include the 65,000 square foot Big Al's Entertainment Center. It is located at the old Beaverton quarry site on Barrows Road, less than one mile from the northern edge of the study area. The Town Square is a mixed -use center including a total of 214,000 square foot of retail and office uses, including three two -story multi- use buildings as well as single -story retail. It is anchored by a 41,000 square foot New 1 Retail Report Portland Metro Area, First Quarter 2013, Norris Beggs & Simpson 2 http://www.regencycenters.com / goals /demopdf/ goals /brpdf/ retail - space /or /beaverton /murrayhill- marketplace #. UbdnmtiwXOA 3 http: // reig. listinglab .com /ProgressRidgeTownSquare/ Page13 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP Seasons grocery store and features a 51,000 square foot Cinetopia movie theater with 12 screens and 1,400 seats. It includes additional specialty retail and office space occupied by Posh Baby, Ace Hardware, Piccolo Mondo Toys, several restaurants, Umpqua Bank, Northwest Urgent Care, and Banfield Pet Hospital, among others. It currently has nearly 30,000 square feet available for rent, according to information currently advertised on Gramor's website, for a total occupancy of 86 percent. • The Village on Scholls Ferry is the closest in proximity to a commercial center that would be built in Area 63. It is a small shopping center roughly 31,000 square feet of retail and space in three separate buildings, with no large anchor tenant. Tenants include a restaurant, nail salon, State Farm Insurance agent, Biscuits Cafe, Sunset Cycles, and Therapeutic associates. It appears to have 6,000 square feet available through Commercial Realty Advisors, for a total occupancy of 81 percent. In summary, within a short drive of the study area, there are several shopping centers that provide a very diverse range of retail and services. There are still significant vacancies in several of these centers, providing room for absorption before any new retail construction is warranted. ° http:// gramor .com /development/progress- ridge - townsquare/ 5 http: / /www.cra- nw.com/ image/ flyersNillage %20on %20Scholls %20Ferry.pdf Page 4 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP .4 1 Figure 2. Area Map 4 • , , .Co L , . , w 1 _ ` i ,. ... , Mount . , _ , � J'- "i ` l ,� - • l ' ri s - W B . ° 1 / . - ) 0 2 e _ B e a , • 111114 ` A A,e - Rtl- - -- � — tirr , . . Urban Reserve Area�OB "` Murray Hill ' .v y _. Mu rraykch ops Town enter cc P ; w 16.200 Progress Albertsons r j t s , Ridge- 3 o \ r ' '' ) r s r - - 1 y,' e v ® _Village on • i Schoils 8,300 Area 1 - gard i v g r t , i 64 . I 1 � kver' a `� �, �� 2,500 � Ili p_ , re Key t ' . 2012Average Daily • Air Traffic Count i Area 0 1___ 63 , Urban Reserve Area ` "� 1.--.......,...... 7 • UGB Expansion Area L J _3,800 - r . , ' Existing Retail ■ 18,300 ,� Source: GoogleEarth, Leland Consulting Group IMPACT OF SOUTH COOPER MOUNTAIN South Cooper Mountain was part of an urban reserve area known as Area 6B, that was brought into the UGB in 2011 and then annexed by the City of Beaverton in 2012. Although the remainder of Area 6B will not be developable until it has been brought into the UGB at some point in the future, Beaverton is responsible for planning both areas simultaneously, which is currently underway. The total area is meant to accommodate a housing projection shortfall for the City of Beaverton, not to provide large areas for employment or commercial services, although some neighborhood serving retail is part of the plan now being Page 15 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP • developed. A market study and existing conditions report from May 2013 noted the following findings: • A preliminary estimate for the South Cooper Mountain concept plan area shows that the area could have between 4,000 and 6,000 households. The market study concluded that the area could support between 47,000 and 142,000 square feet of new retail space, which would primarily be driven by demand from new residents, not from others outside of the area. Indeed, a guiding principle of the planning effort is that any retail would complement existing retail along Scholls Ferry Road, not compete with it. The report recommends planning for a 100,000 square foot commercial center, based upon estimated household expenditures of the projected new households in South Cooper Mountain, for convenience -based shopping such as food, drug stores, flower shops, and personal services. At an FAR of 0.35, this would require approximately 6.5 acres. • The study recommends that the plans take into account the planning underway for River Terrace. "Commercial development in both River Terrace and the SCMAA should be coordinated to ensure both areas are successful." REVISED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The recommended development program for the commercial center at River Terrace takes into account several factors: • The potential market demand of future residents at River Terrace and the reasonable share of their retail spending that could be captured at the center: As described in the 2008 memo, it is assumed that the commercial center will serve a portion of the convenience shopping needs of residents, but that most retail spending will occur outside the neighborhood. The River Terrace center will not be able to compete with the array of offerings and national tenants present at Progress Ridge or Murray Hills and Murray Scholls, and will have to rely on its convenience for its main draw. This market analysis update assumes the same six percent capture of local resident retail spending as was used in the 2008 report. • The potential market demand of existing residents in surrounding neighborhoods that might patronize a commercial center at River Terrace: The only existing neighborhoods that might patronize a center at River Terrace are located to the east of River Terrace, which places them closer to existing centers on Scholls Ferry Road and Barrows Road. While these neighborhoods would contribute some market potential to River Terrace, especially if road connections are made, the contribution will be small and is not factored into this analysis. • The potential market demand from future residents at South Cooper Mountain and the reasonable share of their retail spending that could be captured at the center: As noted above, South Cooper Mountain will have its own, and larger, commercial center as part of its development to serve the convenience shopping needs of residents. Therefore, particularly as traffic congestion at Roy Rogers Road and Schools Ferry Road increases over time, this analysis assumes no additional market demand at River Terrace arising from new residents at South Cooper Mountain. • The potential impact and character of future commercial centers in South Cooper Mountain and elsewhere and the likelihood that they would serve as competition to River Terrace: As described above, South Cooper Mountain will have its own 6 South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan - Market Study Memorandum, ECONorthwest, 29 May 2013. Page 16 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP Lit commercial center, which is proposed to be larger than River Terrace's, and would presumably provide a wider range of services. In this light, it could serve as competition and draw some market demand away from a center at River Terrace. On the other hand, traffic congestion will limit people's desire to drive north to South Cooper Mountain (let alone walk) for convenience trips, helping to keep locally - generated demand within River Terrace. While difficult to quantify, this market analysis assumes that these impacts offset each other and that a River Terrace commercial center will primarily sustain itself on River Terrace residents. Further, the larger size of a center at South Cooper Mountain means that it will likely be grocery- anchored, which makes it more of a competitor to other grocery- anchored centers in the area, not smaller convenience centers like the proposed one at River Terrace. • The strength of the proposed location for retail viability: Since the proposed center is not located directly on Roy Rogers Road, it is unlikely to draw large amounts of drive -by traffic from that thoroughfare. This further strengthens the assumption in this analysis that most of the retail center's demand will be drawn from local residents in River Terrace. The development program is also based on a set of assumptions about the physical location and complementary amenities that must be in place in order to enhance the opportunity for economic success. Those assumptions are as follows: • Civic component. The viability of a commercial center at River Terrace will be greatly enhanced by the presence of a civic component, which could include a library, community center, police station, or some other combination of facilities. The value of the civic component is that, depending on the use, it will provide a reason for residents to visit the center on a more frequent basis and it will provide an authentic heart to the community more than a purely retail center can provide. • Public open space. An important element of the civic component is a public plaza or open space that can be the location for concerts, farmers markets, and other types of community events. This open space would ideally incorporate or be connected to Roshak Pond. • Street Connectivity and Traffic Flow. The concept plan addresses the need for better connectivity through the area. One of those east -west connections would be the Lorenzo Lane and Roshak Road realignment and extension. As shown in Figure 1, this road alignment would create access to the proposed commercial site from residents to the east. It would be a primary route to access Roy Rogers Road, the main route to employment centers in Hillsboro and beyond. This street connectivity and the drive -by traffic and visibility that it would produce will be crucial to the success of the retail land uses, especially since the site is not directly located on Roy Rogers Road. As shown in Table 2, the commercial center at River Terrace could support up to 19,000 square feet of retail space based on an average retail space per capita, the assumed capture rate for the center, and the projected population at River Terrace.' This indicates a higher supportable retail size due to a slightly different methodology for calculating retail space per capita. 'Average retail spending per capita is based on a 2007 CoStar analysis of Portland- region retail inventory and population estimates and is not likely to have changed significantly in recent years. Page 7 LELAND CONSULTING GROUP L Table 2. Supportable Retail Space Square Feet of Projected Total Square Foot Capture Rate for a Center's Retail per Capita Population of Supportable Commercial Supportable Retail Center in the Retail Square Study Area Footage 27.95 11,600 324,000 6% 19.000 Source: CoStar, Leland Consulting Group. In addition to the retail space, a commercial center at River Terrace should have some small offices and service uses that would not be captured in the retail market analysis. A critical mass of activity is required for a center to be successful and anything less than 25,000 square feet runs the risk of being too small to generate enough activity to be viable. Therefore, at least 6,000 square feet of offices and other service uses should be included in the center. In addition to this space would be any buildings used for civic uses such as a library or community center. When accounting for a public plaza, parking, roads and sidewalks, and space for civic uses, the original assumption of five acres is still considered appropriate. Table 3 below shows the types of uses that might be likely to locate in a neighborhood center at River Terrace. Additional uses include yoga studios, doctor or dentist offices, and a myriad of other convenience type retail and services. The final product will depend on the developer and the market opportunities that arise when it is built. Table 3. Sample Development Program — Village Commercial Center Land Use Average Size Land Use Average Size (SF) (SF) Retail Services/Office Mail /Packaging Store 1,400 Daycare 3,000 Coffee Shop 1,500 Real Estate Office 1,300 Dry Cleaner 1.400 Law Office 1,500 Hair Salon 1,200 Accountant Office 1,200 Specialty Grocer 10,000 Source: Leland Consulting Group. CONCLUSION This update to the market analysis for a commercial center at River Terrace indicates that a mixed retail /commercial center of approximately 25,000 square feet will be supportable in the future provided that the planned civic uses and transportation connections are built. Given the site's location at the edge of the urban area, the market demand for the retail will be almost entirely generated by residents within River Terrace itself. As such, the timing of the retail development will be after a substantial amount of surrounding residential development has already taken place, making the commercial components among the last land uses to be built at River Terrace. Page 18 SUPPLEMENTAL. PACKET CITY OF OREGON FOR i tt 25 ,) 6 (DAT OF MEETING) A yfnel hem ilk S River Terrace Town Center Reta Concept Sketches June 25, 2013 GBD This packet documents the Conceptual Program and related Site Sketches created to investigate the retail development potential of Tigard's new River Terrace Village using the market analysis • . areas of the 2013 Report by Leland Consulting Group. :•- r ' , ry a I — - --- -or' t1 . ` - ` { 74,0 ;,, ' q� r J t L � , f . ` #ti � ,a iii * AIL � { • . r r,, >� • . '` \ J ' ► �; t T. • - � # _ , r . 410100 • , AO% , . t ..... V ' eA ,. j ' ''‘ ' a , . . , ,.. ....74...* I ,, y j a w Ar AY • r ' , r , y t . _ i r ,qM • !, • ` ;� lc ■ y�4_. 'd •`• it +ti "' A. :. -� ; f by �► t . ` • % . . ��'t � ., * h a 4,, L ., . 1. J' „ ' r , f � 1 I �( a• �j�'G` +t J �' ` • L . 40 .• 0. 40, \ �► tic � ; �' ,,�� ' / '' � l ' r ' ' �i! 1' 0,0 4 0 " e , i P S j 'r " , t x "' : fir a► i s, '.;F! w� i "% r { . t J fir ► '+ " s i / 1 , IA • 14 • • . ...,•,; , . i. ,, . • .. ., J • 1 • t .4 F,t . T 1 4 f rs -w ,i. i , .. - . '1p -... - ill • ., 3 a rilt I I A ' - , P tti� . - , __gy rw. �:e., i yy R° - . .. • . et. _ .G. s tL -1.-•'-:. . -. -I,e '� «'.°' i ! . "` i AC:oI• .'-R .. _ - > . . • }cS +• " L` . t e a % '` ...:z ,• ik2 +a1 prated 1120 NW Couch St., Suite 300 Portland, OR 97209 Tel. (503) 224 -9656 www.gbdarehitects.co1I V I, •11 • a.. ~' > Cty of Tperd 1 River Terrace Town Center • June 25, 2013 INTRODUCTION • ,_ BACKGROUND fir '''• :/ .ci �ho • _ _ �,.. ,�! _ The 2010 West Bull Mountain Concept Plan developed in 2010 by Washington County Department of Land .....-1. O'.." r ., "^ = _!sue c�- : 'T' ., ' Use and Transportation Long % help transform f u ortation Lon Rand Planning Division established a vision to hel trans orm the former rural ® f. . i It. ‘1,-- • "!- 2• " i '-`' l landscape into a livable urban community, comprised o walkable neighborhoods, a variety o residential densities y. 9, F Lorenzo Lane/ RohakRoad and housing types, parks and natural open spaces, and convenient to neighborhood retail, institutional, and /or civic •, % - r / l � ee rea�.ment and exlenean) uses. Basic commercial ne o f this emerging, new community are proposed to be provided by two neighborhood -e- commercial areas. ,c , ` •' PROPOSED RIVER TERRACE COMMfRC /ALLOCATION The planned northern commercial center follows key recommendations made by Leland Consulting Group regarding — . t .... IT rah, 1.11; commercia/ land area size, type and location. The larger northern retail area is intended to serve as the primary e , l!r. !,,,,LI 7a retail center in the West Bull Mountain providing a pedestrian friendly central gathering place with small shops : •� .si� a... - fronting tree -lined streets supported by an urban plaza /village between the center and the Roshak pond and - °MINIM : 1 t : I associated wetlands. jlri I'LI rev■ 4 4 ,..7,,,- I _ _ _ a ! - •l The viability of the larger northern commercial neighborhood center beyond the initial planning visioning exercise __1 _ _ - r •. . _ - - H I r has come into question. Additional information has been requested to help validate what commercial development -w` market demands (parking, type /use, location, etc) may influence the current envisioned plan. West Bull Mountain /River Terrace MarketAna - Leland Consulting Group The following analysis identifies issues associated with the proposed retail locations. a .`•!' GIVEN PROGRAM (UTILIZED FROM THE 2013 MARKET STUDY FROM LELAND CONSULTING GROUP) Towr C; er The River Terrace Town Center is located in Area 64 of Tigard 's recently annexed River Terrace district. The small .• node ofcommercial development is located in close proximity to existing larger retail /commercial developments. A u'- 16.200 R%grre s plbersans market analysis from the Leland Consulting Group from 2008 to 2013 suggests limiting the commercial development 9 , to approximately 25,000 gsf of retail with the possibility of a civic component, a large public open space and easy _ , aae on vehicular access. SchO is f''8 a iverTera GROUND I* PARKING RATIO PARKING STALLS PARKING GSF (AT 450Sf /STALL) II - - - nr xim RETAIL �, '60) CaffeeShap 1,500 7/1000 10.5 4,,25 Key 2012 Average Daily • r� 1 Cafe /Diner /Pub' 3,500 9/1000 31.5 14,175 Traffic Count i i -' 1 Mail/Packaging Store 1,400 3/1000 4.5 2,025 urban Reserve Area r_____ Dry Cleaner 1,400 3/1000 4.5 2,025 UG13 Expansion Area r Specialty Grocer " 10,000 3/1000 30 13,500 Existing Retail ■ Sa /on /Massage 1,200 3/1000 3.5 1,575 West Ball Mountain /River Terrace Marketdnalysi s- LelandConsultingGroup RETAIL TOTAL 19.000 85 38,250 COMMERCIAL - - - •� � *-411 LawO11ire 1,500 3/1000 4.5 2,025 3 �Tk r Accounting Office 1,200 3 /1000 J.5 1,575 /l Real EstateOffce 1,300 J /1000 4 1,800 D.11,-,,,. 3,000 J /1000 9 4.050 r ��• • �� M COMMERCIAL OFFICE TOTAL 7,000 21 9,450 ... CIVIC COMPONENT 15,000 3/1000 45 20,250 • • ' Cafe added- given recent input from Commercial Realty Advisors NW. The data and drawings illustrated are preliminary A 1:1:2■ •' Unless conceived /envisioned as a Food Co -Op, a Food Market retailer willikely demand approximately 30,000 GSF. in nature and intended to simply conceptualize the • Ili ( Current market user more likely user to be smaller Health/Wellness Fitness focus (Yoga, Barre or Bicycling Studio) type user.) layout and distribution of various outlined uses and • • • • supporting realities (parking, adjacent planned open ' i° r • "Civic size estimated for parking only. Ultimate size and specifuuse tobedetermined. 46 areas and housing locations) to quickly analyze previous _ development assumptions. 0 SUMMARY (NOT INCLUDING HOUSING) Initial Commercial Market review, information and , �. . _ TOTAL FOOTPRINT OF BUILDINGS (RETAIL • COMMERCIAL , CIVIC) 41,000 GSF input has been graciouisly provided by Commercial s r y Akil'i"... 1 I RealtyAdvisorsNW. 1 - ", - •... TOTAL PARKING MINIMUM 151 STALLS fl; ,i Bull 51. tomCo n, ep t R.p , ,,tl'l „n - ns,t„tt..,,r.. OW. In, TOTAL PARKING AREA 67,950 GSF 3 C ty of Tigard I River Terrace Tow^ Center • June 25.20' 3 SITE SKETCH Site Sketch investigates the development aspects of the diagram shown in the 2010 West Bull Mountain Concept Plan coupled with the market analysis by the Leland Consulting Group. THE PROGRAM OF SKETCH A: / �• � W ALK U P TOW N H O M ES Ground Floor Retail: 19,000GSF LOW -RISE APARTMENTS •f � � Ground Floor Commercial Office.- Z000 GSF is F ""` Surface Parking Supporting Retai /and Offue: 106 Stalls i ,, • - Air .}‹ Civic Building (Community Center, Library, etc): 15,000 ' 4. 4 / S ,i `t Surface Parking Supporting Civic Building: 45 Stalls � � i� • Multi - Purpose Plaza: 40,000 GSF I i � ti � li ' , • 0 : :: Iii . P E, L t A � ASSESSMENT: �� 111111411 o k s' • • • THOUGH THE TEST PROGRAM EASILY CONFORMS TO THE PROPOSED SITE AND INFRASTRUCTURE LAYOUT, THE SMALL N� �" C) t% • " • + ' / t N � ADDED. O .4 •. el - . I • THE LOCATION OF THE TOWN CENTER DICTATES THAT SURROUNDING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT MUST HAPPEN 0,D w 0 � �ti ' 0 • , Qi I : . .. _ BEfORfADDING THE SPECULATIVE RETAIL AND OFFICE COMPONENTS . CONSISTENT WITH LfLAND'S p 11 I • A - - 1 -- - , 1 -,- l'*- RECOMMENDATIONS . iHf RESIDENTIAL WILL NEED TUBE BUILT OUT AND OCCUPIED BEFORE ANY KIND OF po ( ,, q� „ I - J , RETAIL OR SERVICE USES COULD FLOURISH. � � Fr S /.'�� I • , i rt 0 _ d► ar , '�h bliiiii�ill�!��U��;�l A.� • • THE LOCATION DF PROPOSED ROADWAYS PROVIDES DIRECT EAST -WEST TRAFFIC ACCESS (DOMINANT VEHICULAR �, �� �; �F .ice • =r �' �, �ii�A����' 1 p e i ACCESS/ WHICH MAY CHALLENGE THE ENVISIONED MULTFMOOAL . BIKE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS � � � Y n ∎ ��r t „ 8 a” , • � ■ STREETS ACCESSING THE CENTER. �, t , � � 1 1 � '° �� �' �� R ; � R `` 444 .0 O „�, E U 1 • IDEALLY. RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILT SPACE WOULD BE DOUBLED (50.000 GSF INSTEAD OF 26.000 GSF LISTED IN THE ( t .�.. c ® ANALYSIS) OR ALLOW FOR INCREASED SQUARE FOOTAGE. IF NOT, A LARGE AMOUNT OF THE TOWN CENTER ` i' h� � '+••••- . ,,,, :,I;t;_• -� l ; 4 ' - y 1 \ \4ram i 1 ,,,.n�� w ■r_ PERIMETER SHOULD BE DEVELOPED WITH A VARIETY OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING TYPES SUCH AS WALK-UP �' . 6 t: '�'•s�""'�• �s� i� ∎ I a Y LOW -RISE APART NT TOWNHOUSES AND LOW RISE APARTMENTS. 41 4' 'r i �� - M rii � r t a r w \�1 r • ADDITIONALLY. LOCAL COMMERCIAL BROKERS HAVE REVIEWED THE PLAN AND CONTRIBUTE THE FOLLOWING: , 41' 40 yO�, G ' ••"• 4.... 0 1. The proposed retail is not situated in an ideal location. To maximize success, the i m' i ��! - .. � 0� 1 _ d ` � . 1 retail should have frontage on either Scholl's Ferry Road or Roy Rogers Rd. 411 �► ; t: A , 1% 2. As proposed, the location is better suited f Civic (i.e. Library) and /or potentially ,^'�� fah, a�4 RETAIL + OFFIC ' � q �� \ �1 r �, l �s' .. Massage, maybe smaller Fitness studios (Yoga, Pilates, Barre method, Cycling , f - 41 4I' ` ., , �1 s � g • i Studio) Real Estate, Insurance, Financial Planning, etc.. a i% \44,':"...-:�, ` �• 7 1 'AL>1 LZl ?�tc �;i„ �Q4 17 1 3. The Developer /Landlord will need to allocate significant incentives towards 1 1' ,* a , ? 1 = tenant improvement allowances coupled with low base rent to attract tenants. 1 .• i�� y! I Q CI r1 f P. P. ►_? ; Eli food 4. If the spaces could be delivered with inexpensive rents, production uses (i.e. \ ** � kP . he :# - n. , d ) _ $12 psf /yr NNN) it is possible that they could attract a Coffee roaster (with Cak) and /or a Bakery. ` i 5. Where food establishments exist, maximize views to the Lake/Wetland area for CIVIC STRUCTURE m WALK-UP TOW N H O M ES (OR BIT RE RETAIL) potential outdoor seating opportunities. - Commercial Realty Advisors NW The angel displfed,lla,irate a vat trey alma, town renter, with Plaza; and s.rroandrg read -. , `•, t• 4., 4 ` . fi rs ]!� 1' 0. . , 4 ''' - / I 4 1d: : . " . , . 1 0 . q ) , y , y • '1P * : t.;i '..: I4 ' : .. --11 - 1 ► a .. .. - J Y. T I!' 7. • ice a - - Sl w, it i ..0 _ a u . . 4 . .. /' �' f t. 5 GBO Architects Incorporate.: C ty of Tigard I R, er Terrace Tow Center • June 25, 20'3 SITE SKETCH B \, In an effort to strengthen the viability of attracting and maintaining a healthy ' retail mix, the small square footage of shops and stores could be sh fted adjacent to ' Roy Rogers Road. In addition, a Multi- Purpose Plaza provides a central space RETAIL + OFFICE supporting the anchor Civicfunction to the east. THE PROGRAM OF SKETCH B: LOW -RISE APARTMENTS 1111 WALK-UP TOWN HOMES (or future Retail) , Ground Floor Retail: 19,000 GSF Ground Floor Commercial Office: 7,000 GSF N "111V . k Surface Parking Supporting Retail and Office: 106 Stalls • a \ • . . / Civic Building (Community Center, Library, etc): 15,000 a.) / /. 1 , � 410, ; Ago) [ ` r •'H C i , ;. TLAN D Surface Parking Supporting Civic Building: 45 Stalls �' • , 1 � I fir ar . ' 1P . ' 11111 11.1 r-04 " Multi - Purpose Plaza: 40,000 GSF Ili (1 e ' . Iallili /ie11 uI /1111/ 1111 ii,-:. •� . ASSESSMENT: • ehICL .Ncd.rie.1::■:1 11 ,ilk CIVIC STRUCTU E CI � 131 ``' ` • THE TEST PROGRAM EASILY CONFORMS TO THE PROPOSED SITE AND INFRASTRUCTURE LAYOUT AND COULD Ill nti 1il !i.11 — r — ' ' ■ EASILY BE INTEGRATED INTO A MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR STANDALONE DEVELOPMENT. . ) ` — 'f . 1. f , . ( �' .1i a liiiimill 1- r 1 1 ' _ i , x,151 h-, zit i il ., • THE LOCATION OF THE RETAIL ALLOWS INCREASED COMMERCIAL MARKET VIABILITY DUE TO HIGHER VISIBILITY, � 1 • � 1 . , ■ • U ■ rat r. ^P+•r � !1 litlidlld i , .11 c , ■ ; ; I 1 Vii! FLEXIBILITY AND ACCESS ALONG ROY AODGERS ROAD AND THE EAST-WEST CONNECTN6 STREETS. Q ❑ � . ■ r . � � - - - - - - - - - , � 1 l �u : . • • THE COMMERCIAL CENTER COULD BE BUILT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RETAIL AND V, y c , .. c i �,/ r/; • •,. COULD HELP ANCHOR DEVELOPMENT AS A GATEWAY INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 11 ' ='- °' '` v.. , 1 r o d ~ ' i I. 2 "i' :• - • .t ■■ l r. • -, ..::ma e 1 o �, !,� ;?� u : : ,.. _ - ...MI. • THE PLAN ALLOWS FOR GREATER FLEXIBILITY IN SIZE FOR ALL USES: COMMERCIAL. RETAIL. CIVIC AND — _ � , . ;. .r =. I ". r ii ,1 ■ ' eii ° '" "" ii. _ RESIDNTIAL USES. � f M t d ' �\ � L 1 ' - ' �� �� t i 1!M • "''� ' • THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ROADWAYS PROVIDES SLOWER EAST -WEST TRAFFIC ACCESS AROUND /THROUGH I \ ± � - VP �i ( 4 •t 3 r — "' ' x •at "� ''' v i THE COMMERCIAL CENTER HELPING REINFORCE ENVISIONED MULTI -MODAL PEDESTRIAN, BIKE AND , • ® t` ^ "� • ;�`,' "!�!� �� :� �. ..� 1 \ nom/ • . 1; ;,�; •..a '�/11� mall M�jui 1�s liar' �, f i f '+ 11 :' S 11'9111 o.ww VEHICULAR ACCESS STREETS ACCESSING THE CENTER. : • t, ill�lUi. -1'� 1 • RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILT SPACE COULD BE DOUBLED (50,000 GSF NSTEAD OF 26,000 GSF LISTED M THE �t♦ ^ I� � �• r ANALYSIS) OR ALLOW FOR WCREASED SQUARE FOOTAGE. OR THE TOWN CENTER PERIMETER COULD BE itt i F it I t1� [ 1 ) :11 ' 1 • q . � ..- _ I � _ • +_-=_e = -- L � i� r _ t� -�I 1I1 � � DEVELOPED WITH A VARIETY OFMULTI FAMIL VHOUSINGTYPfSSUCNASWA LKUPTOWNHOUSES Ilk , L T _ ... it I ^ , i il ce d o s � .' =' AND LOW RISE APARTMENTS. ii Mix* .2,i!lli?. ft , �. t•• 3w : 11.►miss \idA _ • ADDITIONALLY, LOCAL COMMERCIAL BROKERS HAVE REVIEWED THE PL A N AND CONTRIBUTE THE FOLLOWING: g •s � i i N BUTE �� _ " • - - ( t 1 Q r 1. Greater frontage and exposure along Roy Rogers Road will be key to attracting ` a = E p vlP 11' - 1 � • '� W _ . . . .. 1 ; retail tenant interest. N lP ! r .: i G 2. The site sketch increa opporhmities/potential fora Coffee Shop or small trod '!I1* t 1 r 1 1� " Q . 0lop retailer and /or Grocer. • * - ri t t.l(I •W err 41 � � O IN -. 3. The open space will require prescribed and heavily programmed activities. I � �' vl. -`1► - 41161 — - 4. Be flexible. Create the zone for figure retail but kr the market mature. -. lire I I ' yv 0 i `'I gr 5. The open space Piazza will need to prescribed events and he heavily v 411,1 i k WALK-UP TOWN HOMES (OR FUTURE RETAIL) rammed wit act ivities to support the Center. P p� _ LOW-RISE APARTMENTS S - Q , The o..gu li pleyd iN•untr • vnirry ■mafirr from mem, Mown iwrndwriwd .etrr•1 jistwn ea mrrn wdin raid `�_ r r , , • rrt Y n 1 'r N• • • ! • e - Y . - ' �, u I .. I if - • .. P -- ". -"0 ' _ ' . , .._. • . i* i ' /....' i :, .ip , ,,� t ,-, -.tom -b, - I _ ` � 4 ' I . a ere•= N.. f ∎ , j ) r �i r� .1st' ♦ �� - �4�r .� !! e►' 1 . _'" - t • • .! _ aaar.� Jer rt S .. - A • 1 7 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . Do not compete with the larger mega- retail developments. Be unique, but traditional. Embrace the quaint aspects of the small town center with plaza /piazza bordered by a diverse mixture of shops and a focal Civicfunction. Keep it small and friendly. Be easy, convenient and comfortable. 2 . An active, vibrant town center is difficult to create with minimal amount of retail and office space planned. Marketing challenges aside, plan for greater retail opportunities and, flexibility to accommodate future market demands. 3 . Locating the Retail on Roy Rogers Road would provide needed exposure and allow development before the district is built out with housing. 4 . Strive for a unique mix of tenants that attract people from both inside and outside the neighborhood /district. 5 . Keep Retail on thegroundfoor only. Commercial Office space could be located on a second level, but reduces the building footprint and requires vertical circulation. 6 . Encourage easy vehicular access with both on- street parking in addition to landscaped ancillary surface parking lots. Provide ample amount of public bike parking. 7 . Embrace pedestrian friendly universal, streets. 8 . The Plaza should be multi purpose and flexible and will need to host prescribed events and be heavily programmed with activities to support the Center. Bring the Enhanced Wetland experience into the Town Center where possible - allowing it to be a feature as well as a sustainable tool helping to filter storm water runoff 9 . Brand the Town Center early and define the visions through Design Guidelines that dictate the envisioned scale, design materials, and both building and streetscape detail standards. 10 . Flexible Zoning - Allow parcels to develop commercial retail /or housing going forward. GBD Architects Incorporated 1120 NW Couch St.. Suite 300 Portland. OR 97209 Tel. (503) 224 -9656 www.gbdarchitecis.com AIS -1366 9 Business Meeting Meeting Date: 06/25/2013 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Contract Award - River Terrace Community Plan Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services Local Contract Review Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Board Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required ?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: • Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the development of a River Terrace Community Plan to Otak? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the development of the River Terrace Community Plan to Otak and authorize the City Manager to take the necessary steps to fully execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The city recently annexed 500 acres west of its boundary known as River Terrace. The area consists of 450 acres brought into the urban growth boundary in 2002 (Areas 63 and 64) and 50 acres brought in in 2011 (Roy Rogers West). The addition to the UGB initiated the process for these once rural lands to be developed. Prior to urbanization, regional regulations require the preparation of comprehensive plan provisions and land use regulations. Tigard will build upon the planning work done by Washington County in the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan (WBMCP) completed in 2010. The concept plan outlined a vision for the area based on the principles of: • Great neighborhoods • Resource preservation and protection • Connected, walkable and accessible transportation system • Community focal points, including mixed use areas • Parks, open spaces and community facilities • Integration with existing Bull Mt. neighborhoods That vision was captured in land use, transportation, natural resources, and parks and trails framework maps and an analysis of the infrastructure needed to serve the arca. Close coordination with Beaverton, Washington County and Clean Water Services has the potential for taking advantage of economies of scale and cost savings in providing needed infrastructure. River Terrace will primarily develop with residential uses and is expected to provide approximately 2,800 dwelling units. A small mixed -use neighborhood commercial area will provide convenience for residents and local users, and the Tigard - Tualatin School District owns a property that will eventually be the location of a new elementary school. The city's planning work will focus on reviewing and refining the work completed by Washington County and adopting the required zoning, land use regulations, infrastructure master plan updates and financing strategies to support the successful development of the River Terrace area. The city will need the assistance of a consulting firm /team to compete this work. The consultant team will provide infrastructure master planning services and an infrastructure financing strategy for the River Terrace Community Plan project. They will combine the findings with existing master plan information to also create a public facility plan that meets Statewide Planning Goal 11 requirements. The consultant team is composed of well qualified experts to complete the contract components. The city expects a high degree of ability and understanding to coordinate the various transportation, engineering and infrastructure finance experts, and communicate project goals and outcomes to stakeholders, the community and policy makers. The city has developed a scope of work for the River Terrace Community Plan project. Tasks associated with land use, natural resources and public involvement will be managed by city staff and outside of this contract. Although the consultant team will not be responsible for these tasks, they will need to coordinate with city staff to ensure the use of consistent data and assumptions. The consultant team will not need to facilitate public meetings, but will present technical information to a stakeholder working group, technical advisory committee and a series of community meetings. The remaining tasks associated with infrastructure planning represent the city's best estimation of how to complete the community planning in approximately 12 months from the commencement of consultant services through River Terrace Community Plan adoption. There will be seven components to the project, conducted generally concurrently and linked together with the public involvement program: 1) Tigard Park System Master Plan Update; 2) Tigard Water System Master Plan Update; 3) Tigard Transportation System Plan Update; 4) Tigard Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update; 5) River Terrace Stormwater Master Plan; 6) River Terrace Infrastructure Financing Strategy; and 7) Tigard Public Facility Plan Update. Some of these tasks can be accomplished through adopted addendums to existing master plans and as currently envisioned, capital funding for public improvements needed to support the River Terrace area will be generated via development activity in the area. Staff issued a Qualification -based Request for Proposal (QBS) on March 20, 2013 for consulting services for the River Terrace Community Plan. The QBS contained the following scoring criteria in effort to select the most qualified consultant: • Firm and Project Team Qualifications and Experience - 40 points • Project Approach to Master Plan Updates - 40 points • Project Approach to Infrastructure Financing Strategy - 20 points. Responses to the QBS were due on April 17th and the city received one response which was from Otak. A selection team of city staff scored the proposal and found that Otak was very qualified to perform the work and, as such, entered into negotiations with Otak for the project. A project total of $463,500 with contingencies is the current negotiated cost of the project but anticipates the scope and cost will be fine tuned over the coming weeks. Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the River Terrace Community Plan to Otak in the amount of $463,500. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board could direct staff to reissue the QBS document as only one proposal was received but the result may be the same. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Staff presented an update on the consultant selection process to the Council at their April 23, 2013 Study Session. Attachments No file() attached. AgendaQuick©2005 - 2013 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved